Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
or

OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (419) 247-5000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

(Cover page 1 of 2 pages)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý                    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes ý                    No o

        The aggregate market value (based on the consolidated tape closing price on February 28, 2003) of the voting stock beneficially held by non-affiliates of Owens-Illinois, Inc. was approximately $945,341,000. For the sole purpose of making this calculation, the term "non-affiliate" has been interpreted to exclude directors and executive officers of the Company. Such interpretation is not intended to be, and should not be construed to be, an admission by Owens-Illinois, Inc. or such directors or executive officers of the Company that such directors and executive officers of the Company are "affiliates" of Owens-Illinois, Inc., as that term is defined under the Securities Act of 1934.

        The number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value of Owens-Illinois, Inc. outstanding as of February 28, 2003 was 147,748,044.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III    Owens-Illinois, Inc. Proxy Statement for The Annual Meeting of Share Owners To Be Held Wednesday, May 14, 2003 ("Proxy Statement").

TABLE OF GUARANTORS

        The address, including zip code, and telephone number, of each additional registrant's principal executive office is One Seagate, Toledo, Ohio 43666 (419) 247-5000. These companies are listed as guarantors of the debt securities of the registrant. The consolidating condensed financial statements of the Company depicting separately its guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries are presented in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. All of the equity securities of each of the guarantors set forth in the table above are owned, either directly or indirectly, by Owens-Illinois, Inc.

(Cover page 2 of 2 pages)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General Development of Business

        Owens-Illinois, Inc. (the "Company") through its subsidiaries, is the successor to a business established in 1903. The Company is one of the world's leading manufacturers of packaging products. The Company is the largest manufacturer of glass containers in North America, South America, Australia and New Zealand, and one of the largest in Europe. The Company is also a worldwide manufacturer of plastics packaging with operations in North America, South America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. Plastics packaging products manufactured by the Company include consumer products (blow molded containers, injection molded closures and dispensing systems) and prescription containers. Consistent with its strategy to continue to strengthen its existing packaging businesses, the Company has acquired 18 glass container businesses in 18 countries since 1991, including businesses in North America, South America, Central and Eastern Europe and the Asia Pacific region, and 7 plastics packaging businesses with operations in 12 countries.

        The Company believes it is a technological leader in the worldwide glass container and plastics packaging segments of the rigid packaging market. During the five years ended December 31, 2002, the Company invested more than $2.3 billion in capital expenditures (excluding acquisitions) and more than $362.0 million in research, development and engineering to, among other things, improve labor and machine productivity, increase capacity in growing markets and commercialize technology into new products.

        The principal executive office of the Company is located at One SeaGate, Toledo, Ohio 43666; the telephone number is (419) 247-5000. The Company's website is www.o-i.com. The Company's annual report and SEC filings can be obtained from this site at no cost.

Financial Information about Product Segments

        Information as to sales, earnings before interest income, interest expense, provision for income taxes, minority share owners' interests in earnings of subsidiaries, and extraordinary charges ("EBIT"), and total assets by product segment is included in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Narrative Description of Business

        The Company has two product segments: (1) Glass Containers and (2) Plastics Packaging. Below is a description of these segments and information to the extent material to understanding the Company's business taken as a whole.

Products and Services, Customers, Markets and Competitive Conditions, and Methods of Distribution

GLASS CONTAINERS PRODUCT SEGMENT

        The Company is a leading manufacturer of glass containers throughout the world. Approximately one of every two glass containers made worldwide is made by the Company, its affiliates or its licensees. Worldwide glass container sales represented 69%, 66%, and 67%, of the Company's consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company manufactured approximately 39% of all glass containers sold by domestic producers in the U.S., making the Company the leading manufacturer of glass containers in the U.S. The Company is the leading glass container manufacturer in 17 of the 19 countries where it competes in the glass container segment of the rigid packaging market and the sole manufacturer of glass containers in eight of these countries.

1

Products and Services

        In the U.S., the Company produces glass containers for malt beverages including beer and ready to drink low alcohol refreshers, food, tea, juice, liquor, wine and pharmaceuticals. The Company also produces glass containers for soft drinks, principally outside the U.S. The Company manufactures these products in a wide range of sizes, shapes and colors. As a leader in glass container innovation, the Company is active in new product development.

Customers

        In most of the countries where the Company competes, it has the leading position in the glass container segment of the rigid packaging market (based on units sold). The largest customers include many of the leading manufacturers and marketers of glass packaged products in the world. In the U.S., the majority of customers for glass containers are brewers, food producers, distillers and wine vintners. Outside of the U.S., glass container customers also include soft drink bottlers. The largest U.S. glass container customers include (in alphabetical order) Anheuser-Busch, Cambell, Coors, Gerber and H.J. Heinz. The largest international glass container customers include Diageo, Foster's, Heineken, Labatt, Lion Nathan, Molson, and SABMiller. The Company is the sole glass container supplier to many of these "blue chip" customers.

        The Company sells most of its glass container products directly to customers under annual or multi-year supply agreements. The Company also sells some of its products through distributors. Glass containers are typically scheduled for production in response to customers' orders for their quarterly requirements.

Markets and Competitive Conditions

        The principal markets for glass container products made by the Company are in North America, South America, Europe and the Asia Pacific region. The Company believes it is the low-cost producer in the glass container segment of the North American rigid packaging market, as well as the low-cost producer in most of the international glass container segments in which it competes. Much of this cost advantage is due to proprietary equipment and process technology used by the Company. The Company's machine development activities and systematic upgrading of production equipment in the 1980's and 1990's have given it low-cost leadership in the glass container segment in many of the countries in which it competes, a key strength to competing successfully in the rigid packaging market.

        The Company has the leading share of the glass container segment of the U.S. rigid packaging market based on units sold by domestic producers in the U.S., with its sales representing approximately 40% of that segment for the year ended December 31, 2002. The principal glass container competitors in the U.S. are Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, and Anchor Glass Container Corporation.

        In supplying glass containers outside of the U.S., the Company competes directly with Compagnie de Saint-Gobain in Italy and Brazil, Rexam plc and Ardagh plc in the U.K., Vetropak in the Czech Republic and Amcor Limited in Australia. In other locations in Europe, the Company competes indirectly with a variety of glass container firms including Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, BSN Glasspack, Vetropak and Rexam plc. Except as mentioned above, the Company does not compete with any large, multi-national glass container manufacturers in Mexico, South America or the Asia Pacific region.

        In addition to competing with other large, well-established manufacturers in the glass container segment, the Company competes with manufacturers of other forms of rigid packaging, principally aluminum cans and plastic containers, on the basis of quality, price and service. The principal competitors producing metal containers are Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Rexam plc, Ball Corporation and Silgan Holdings Inc. The principal competitors producing plastic containers are

2

Amcor, Consolidated Container Holdings, LLC, Graham Packaging Company, Plastipak Packaging, Inc. and Silgan Holdings Inc. The Company also competes with manufacturers of non-rigid packaging alternatives, including flexible pouches and aseptic cartons, in serving the packaging needs of juice customers.

        The Company's unit shipments of glass containers in countries outside of the U.S. have grown substantially from levels of the early 1990's. The Company has added to its international operations by acquiring glass container companies, many of which have leading positions in growing or established markets, increasing capacity at select foreign affiliates, and maintaining the global network of glass container companies that license its technology. In many developing countries, the Company's international glass operations have benefited in the last ten years from increased consumer spending power, a trend toward the privatization of industry, a favorable climate for foreign investment, lowering of trade barriers and global expansion programs by multi-national consumer companies. Due to the weighting of labor as a production cost, glass containers have a significant cost advantage over plastic and metal containers in developing countries where labor wage rates are relatively low.

        The Company's majority ownership positions in international glass affiliates are summarized below:

        North America.    In addition to the glass container operations in the U.S., the Company's affiliate in Canada is the sole manufacturer of glass containers in that country.

        South America.    The Company's affiliates in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru are the sole manufacturers of glass containers in those countries. In both Brazil and Venezuela, the Company is the leading manufacturer of glass containers. In South America, there is a large infrastructure for returnable/refillable glass containers. However, with improving economic conditions in South America after the recessions of the late 1990's, unit sales of non-returnable glass containers have grown in Venezuela, Colombia and Brazil.

        Europe.    The Company's European glass container business has operations in eight countries

3

        and is one of the largest in Europe. In Italy, the Company's wholly-owned affiliate, AVIR, is the leading manufacturer of glass containers and operates 13 glass container plants. AVIR accounted for approximately 50% of our total European glass container sales in 2002. United Glass, the Company's affiliate in the U.K., is a leading manufacturer of glass containers for the U.K. spirits business. In Poland, the Company is the leading glass container manufacturer and currently operates two plants. The Company's affiliate in the Czech Republic, Avirunion, is the leading glass container manufacturer in that country and also ships a portion of its beer bottle production to Germany. In Hungary, the Company is the sole glass container manufacturer and serves the Hungarian food industry. In Finland and the Baltic country of Estonia, the Company is the only manufacturer of glass containers. The Company coordinates production activities between Finland and Estonia in order to efficiently serve the Finnish, Baltic and Russian markets. In recent years, Western European brewers have been establishing beer production facilities in Central Europe and the Russian Republic. Because these new beer plants use high-speed filling lines, they require high quality glass containers in order to operate properly. The Company believes it is well positioned to meet this growing demand. In Spain, the Company serves the market for wine bottles in the Barcelona and southern France area.

        Asia Pacific.    The Company has glass operations in four countries in the Asia Pacific region: Australia, New Zealand, Indonesia and China. The Asia Pacific affiliates are the leading manufacturers of glass containers in most of the countries in which they compete. In Australia, the Company operates five glass container plants, including a plant focused on serving the needs of the rapidly growing Australian wine industry. In New Zealand, the Company is the sole glass container manufacturer. In Indonesia, the Company's affiliate supplies the Indonesian market and exports glass containers for food and pharmaceutical products to Australian customers. In China, the glass container segments of the packaging market are regional and highly fragmented with a number of local competitors. The Company has three modern glass container plants in China manufacturing high-quality beer bottles to serve Foster's as well as Anheuser-Busch, which is now producing Budweiser® in and for the Chinese market.

        The Company continues to focus on serving the needs of leading multi-national consumer companies as they pursue international growth opportunities. The Company believes that it is often the glass container partner of choice for such multi-national consumer companies due to its leadership in glass technology and its status as a low-cost producer in most of the markets it serves.

Manufacturing

        The Company believes it is the low-cost producer in the glass container segment of the North American rigid packaging market, as well as the low-cost producer in most of the international glass segments in which it competes. Much of this cost advantage is due to the Company's proprietary equipment and process technology. The Company believes its glass forming machines, developed and refined by its engineering group, are significantly more efficient and productive than those used by competitors. The Company's machine development activities and systematic upgrading of production equipment in the 1980's and 1990's have given it low-cost leadership in the glass container segment in most of the countries in which it competes, a key strength to competing successfully in the rigid packaging market.

        Over the last ten years, the Company has more than doubled its overall glass container labor and machine productivity in the U.S., as measured by output produced per man-hour. By applying it's technology and worldwide "best practices" during this period, the Company decreased the number of production employees required per glass-forming machine line in the U.S. by over 35%, and increased the daily output of glass-forming machines by approximately 40%.

4

Methods of Distribution

        Due to the significance of transportation costs and the importance of timely delivery, glass container manufacturing facilities are generally located close to customers. In the U.S., most of the Company's glass container products are shipped by common carrier to customers within a 250-mile radius of a given production site. In addition, the Company's glass container operations outside the U.S. export some products to customers beyond their national boundaries, which may include transportation by rail and ocean delivery in combination with common carriers. The Company also operates several machine and mold shops that manufacture high-productivity glass-forming machines, molds and related equipment.

Suppliers and Raw Materials

        The primary raw materials used in the Company's glass container operations are sand, soda ash and limestone. Each of these materials, as well as the other raw materials used to manufacture glass containers, have historically been available in adequate supply from multiple sources. For certain raw materials, however, there may be temporary shortages due to weather or other factors, including disruptions in supply caused by raw material transportation or production delays.

Glass Recycling

        The Company is an important contributor to the recycling effort in the U.S. and continues to melt substantial recycled glass tonnage in its glass furnaces. If sufficient high-quality recycled glass were available on a consistent basis, the Company has the technology to operate using 100% recycled glass. Using recycled glass in the manufacturing process reduces energy costs and prolongs the operating life of the glass melting furnaces.

PLASTICS PACKAGING PRODUCT SEGMENT

        The Company is a leading manufacturer in North America of plastic containers, plastic closures and plastic prescription containers. The Company also has plastics packaging operations in South America, Europe, Singapore, Australia and New Zealand. Plastics packaging sales represented 31%, 34% and 32% of the Company's consolidated net sales for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Manufacturing and Products

        The plastics packaging business utilizes two basic manufacturing processes:

Blow-Molded Plastics Packaging

        Blow-molding is a plastics manufacturing process where pre-heated plastic is captured inside a hollow mold and using pressurized air is blown, much like a balloon, into a container. After being cooled, the mold is opened and the plastic product is removed.

        In blow-molded plastics packaging, the Company is a leading U.S. manufacturer of high density polyethylene (HDPE) containers. The Company manufactures these containers for products for the food and beverage, household, personal care, health care and chemical and automotive fluid end-use categories.

5

        The Company is also a leading worldwide manufacturer of PET blow-molded containers. Many of these PET containers are manufactured using multiple layers of plastic, with each layer having a different function. Some of these plastic layers have "barrier" properties, effectively blocking the escape of carbon dioxide out of, and the permeation of oxygen into, the packaged product thereby maintaining product quality and extending shelf life. Examples of products packaged in multi-layer PET containers include Heinz ketchup and Pepsi's Dole® and Season's Best® brands. Major brewers, such as Anheuser-Busch, Coors and Miller Brewing, are now marketing beer packaged in the Company's multi-layer PET beer bottles at selected venues and locations.

Injection-Molded Plastics Packaging

        Injection molding is a plastics manufacturing process where plastic resin in the form of pellets or powder is melted and then injected or otherwise forced under pressure into a mold. The mold is then cooled and the product is removed from the mold.

        The Company develops and produces injection-molded plastic closures and closure systems, which typically incorporate functional features such as tamper evidence and child resistance or dispensing. Other products include trigger sprayers for household cleaning products, finger and lotion pumps for fragrances and cosmetics, as well as injection-molded containers for deodorant and toothpaste.

        The prescription product unit manufactures injection-molded plastic prescription containers. These products are sold primarily to drug wholesalers, major drug chains and mail order pharmacies. Containers for prescriptions include ovals, vials, ointment jars, dropper bottles and automation friendly prescription containers.

Customers

        The Company's largest customers (in alphabetical order) for plastic containers and closures include Church and Dwight, H.J. Heinz, Johnson & Johnson, Ocean Spray, PepsiCo (Dole®, Gatorade®, Tropicana®), Procter & Gamble and Unilever. The largest customers for prescription containers include AmeriSourceBergen, Cardinal Health, Eckerd Drug, McKesson, Walgreen, Rite-Aid and Merck-Medco.

        The Company sells most plastic containers, plastic closures and plastic prescription containers directly to customers under annual or multi-year supply agreements. These supply agreements typically allow a pass-through of resin price increases and decreases, except for the prescription business. The Company also sells some of its products through distributors.

Markets and Competitive Conditions

        Major markets for plastics packaging include the food and beverage, household products, personal care products, health care products and chemical and automotive fluid industries.

        The plastics segment of the rigid packaging market is competitive and fragmented due to generally available technology, low costs of entry and customer emphasis on low package cost. A large number of competitors exist on both a national and regional basis. The Company competes with other manufacturers in the plastic containers segment on the basis of quality, price, service and product design. The principal competitors producing plastic containers are Amcor, Consolidated Container Holdings, LLC, Graham Packaging Company, Plastipak Packaging, Inc. and Silgan Holdings Inc. The Company emphasizes total package supply (i.e., bottle and closure system), diversified market positions, proprietary technology and products, new package development and packaging innovation. The plastic closures segment is divided into various categories in which several suppliers compete for business on the basis of quality, price, service and product design.

        The Company's approach has been to identify and serve areas of the plastics packaging segment where customers seek distinctive and functional packaging to differentiate their products among an

6

array of choices offered to consumers. The Company believes it is a leader in technology and development of custom products and has a leading market position in the U.S. for such products. The Company believes its plastic containers and plastic closures businesses have a competitive advantage as a result of one of the shortest new product development cycles in the industry, enabling it to respond quickly to customer needs in the rapidly changing custom plastic containers and closures segments. The Company's product innovations in plastics packaging include in-mold labeling for custom-molded bottles and multi-layer bottles containing post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic.

Manufacturing

        The exact type of blow-molding manufacturing process the Company uses is dependent on the plastic product type and package requirements. These blow-molding processes include: various types of extrusion blow-molding for medium- and large-sized HDPE, low density polyethelene (LDPE), polypropylene and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) containers; stretch blow-molding for medium-sized PET containers; injection blow-molding for small health care and personal care containers in various materials; two-stage PET blow-molding for high volume, high performance mono-layer, multi-layer and heat-set PET containers; and proprietary blow-molding for drain-back systems and other specialized applications.

        Injection-molding is used in the manufacture of plastic closures, trigger sprayers, deodorant canisters, ink cartridges and vials. Compression-molding, an alternative to injection-molding, is used for high volume carbonated soft drink and other beverage closures that require tamper evidence.

Methods of Distribution

        In the U.S., most of the Company's plastic containers, plastic closures and plastic prescription containers are shipped by common carrier. In addition, the Company's plastics packaging operations outside the U.S. export some products to customers beyond their national boundaries, which may include transportation by rail and ocean delivery in combination with common carriers.

Suppliers and Raw Materials

        The Company manufactures containers and closures using HDPE, LDPE, polypropylene, PVC, PET and various other plastic resins. The Company also purchases large quantities of master batch colorants, corrugated materials and labels. In general, these raw materials are available in adequate supply from multiple sources. However, for certain raw materials, there may be temporary shortages due to market conditions and other factors.

        Worldwide suppliers of plastic resins used in the production of plastics packaging include Voridian (formerly Eastman Chemical), Dow Chemical, ExxonMobil, Basell, Chevron Phillips and BP Solvay. Historically, prices for plastic resins have been subject to dramatic fluctuations. However, resin cost pass-through provisions are typical in the Company's supply contracts with its plastics packaging customers.

        With the exception of PolyOne, Ampacet and Clariant, each of which does business worldwide, most suppliers of batch colorants are regional in scope. Historically, prices for these raw materials have been subject to dramatic fluctuations. However, cost recovery for batch colorants is included in resin pass-through provisions which are typical of the Company's supply contracts with its plastics packaging customers.

        Worldwide suppliers of corrugated materials include International Paper, Georgia-Pacific, Weyerhauser, Temple-Inland, and Smurfit-Stone Container. Historically, prices for corrugated materials have not been subject to dramatic fluctuations, except for temporary spikes or troughs from time to time.

7

        With the exception of Fuji Seal (Japan) and its subsidiary, American Fuji Seal, most suppliers of plastic labels are regional in scope. Historically, prices for these raw materials have not been subject to dramatic fluctuations.

Recycling

        Recycling content legislation, which has been enacted in several states, requires that a certain specified minimum percentage of recycled plastic be included in certain new plastic containers. The Company has met such legislated standards in part due to its material and multi-layer process technology. The Company's plastic containers are made with PCR plastic constituting somewhere between 25% and 100% of the material used to produce the container. In addition, its plastics plants also recycle virtually all of the internal scrap generated in the production process.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Technical Assistance License Agreements

        The Company licenses its proprietary glass container technology to 25 companies in 24 countries. In plastics packaging, the Company has technical assistance agreements with 24 companies in 15 countries. These agreements cover areas ranging from manufacturing and engineering assistance, to support in functions such as marketing, sales and administration. The worldwide licensee network provides a stream of revenue to support the Company's development activities and gives it the opportunity to participate in the rigid packaging market in countries where it does not already have a direct presence. In addition, the Company's technical agreements enable it to apply "best practices" developed by its worldwide licensee network. In the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, the Company earned $24.2 million, $24.6 million and $25.3 million, respectively, in royalties and net technical assistance revenue.

Research and Development

        Research and development constitutes an important part of the Company's activities. Research and development expenditures were $41.1 million, $41.2 million, and $46.7 million for 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. In addition, engineering expenditures were $38.9 million, $31.4 million, and $31.3 million for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company's research, development and engineering activities include new products, manufacturing process control, automatic inspection and further automation.

Environmental and Other Governmental Regulation

        The Company's worldwide operations, in common with those of the industry generally, are subject to extensive laws, ordinances, regulations and other legal requirements relating to environmental protection, including legal requirements governing investigation and clean-up of contaminated properties as well as water discharges, air emissions, waste management and workplace health and safety. Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment for environmental control activities were not material during 2002.

        In August 1998, the Company received a Notice of Violation from the United States Environmental Protection Agency regarding alleged opacity violations at its Oakland, California glass container plant from the period of 1994 through 1997. Certain furnaces at the plant are equipped with monitors that continuously monitor opacity. During this period, these furnaces had occasional upset and breakdown conditions that caused opacity excursions that were reported to the State of California as required. In each instance an opacity violation notice was given by the State of California and in each case the matter was settled. This action by the U.S. EPA involves the same incidents that were resolved with the State of California. The Company has reached a settlement in principle with the U.S.

8

EPA under which it will pay certain monetary penalties, without requiring any additional permits or abatement equipment.

        In September 2001, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality issued a Notice of Violation to the Company's plant located in Toano, Virginia, alleging violations of certain regulations in connection with certain changes that were made to the furnaces during repairs. The Company has reached a settlement with the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality under which it will voluntarily install abatement equipment, agreed to certain production capacity limitations that are not expected to materially impact operations, and paid certain monetary penalties.

        The monetary penalties for the Oakland matter and the Toano matter are not expected to exceed $425,000 in the aggregate.

        A number of governmental authorities, both in the U.S. and abroad, have enacted, or are considering, legal requirements that would mandate certain rates of recycling, the use of recycled materials and/or limitations on certain kinds of packaging materials such as plastics. The Company believes that governmental authorities in both the U.S. and abroad will continue to enact and develop such legal requirements.

        In the U.S., sales of non-refillable glass beverage bottles and other convenience packages are affected by mandatory deposit laws and other types of restrictive legislation. As of January 1, 2003, there were nine states with mandatory deposit laws in effect. A number of states and local governments have enacted or are considering legislation to promote curbside recycling and recycled content legislation as alternatives to mandatory deposit laws. Although such legislation is not uniformly developed, the Company believes that states and local governments will continue to enact and develop curbside recycling and recycling content legislation.

        Plastic containers have also been the subject of legislation in various states, which requires that a certain specified minimum percentage of recycled plastic be included in new plastic products. The Company utilizes recycled plastic resin in its manufacturing processes.

        Although the Company is unable to predict what environmental legal requirements may be adopted in the future, it has not made, and does not anticipate making, material expenditures with respect to environmental protection. However, the compliance costs associated with environmental legal requirements may result in future additional costs to operations.

Intellectual Property Rights

        The Company has a large number of patents which relate to a wide variety of products and processes, has a substantial number of patent applications pending, and is licensed under several patents of others. While in the aggregate the Company's patents are of material importance to its businesses, the Company does not consider that any patent or group of patents relating to a particular product or process is of material importance when judged from the standpoint of any segment or its businesses as a whole.

        The Company has a number of intellectual property rights, comprised of both patented and proprietary technology, that make the Company's glass forming machines more efficient and productive than those used by our competitors. In addition, the efficiency of the Company's glass forming machines is enhanced by the Company's overall approach to cost efficient manufacturing technology, which extends from batch house to warehouse. This technology is proprietary to the Company through a combination of issued patents, pending applications, copyrights, trade secret and proprietary know-how.

        Upstream of the glass forming machine, there is technology to deliver molten glass to the forming machine at high rates of flow and fully conditioned to be homogeneous in consistency, viscosity and

9

temperature for efficient forming into glass containers. The Company has proprietary know-how in (a) the batch house, where raw materials are stored, measured and mixed, (b) the furnace control system and furnace combustion, and (c) the forehearth and feeding system to deliver such homogeneous glass to the forming machines.

        In the Company's glass container manufacturing processes, computer control and electro-mechanical mechanisms are commonly used for feeding molten glass to the forming machines. Various patents held by the Company describe electro-mechanical mechanisms and related technology used for feeding molten glass to the forming machines. Others represent electro-mechanical mechanisms and related technology used by the Company for shearing glass gobs for delivery to the forming machines. Additional U.S. patents and various pending applications represent technology used by the Company for measuring and precisely delivering glass gobs to the forming machines.

        Downstream of the glass forming machines there is patented and unpatented technology for ware handling, annealing, coating and inspection, which further enhance the overall efficiency of the manufacturing process.

        While the above patents and intellectual property rights are representative of the technology used in the Company's glass manufacturing operations, there are numerous other pending patent applications, trade secrets and other proprietary know-how and technology, as supplemented by administrative and operational best practices, which contribute to the Company's competitive advantage. As noted above, however, the Company does not consider that any patent or group of patents relating to a particular product or process is of material importance when judged from the standpoint of any segment or its businesses as a whole.

Seasonality

        Sales of particular glass container and plastics packaging products such as beer, food and beverage containers and closures for beverages are seasonal. Shipments in the U.S. and Europe are typically greater in the second and third quarters of the year, while shipments in South America and the Asia Pacific region are typically greater in the first and fourth quarters of the year.

Employees

        The Company employed approximately 31,600 persons at December 31, 2002. A majority of the Company's hourly workers are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Several collective bargaining agreements, which at December 31, 2002, covered approximately 96% of the Company's union-affiliated employees in the U.S., extend through various dates in 2005 and beyond. The Company considers its employee relations to be good.

Financial Information about Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales

        Information as to net sales, EBIT, and assets of the Company's product and geographic segments is included in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Export sales, in the aggregate or by geographic area, were not material for the years 2002, 2001, or 2000.

10

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

        The principal manufacturing facilities and other material important physical properties of the continuing operations of the Company at December 31, 2002 are listed below and grouped by product segment. All properties shown are owned in fee except where otherwise noted.

Glass Containers

11

12

13

Corporate Facilities

World Headquarters Building
Toledo, OH (2)

Levis Development Park
Perrysburg, OH

(1)

This facility is financed in whole or in part under tax-exempt financing agreements.

(2)

This facility is leased in whole or in part.

        The Company believes that its facilities are well maintained and currently adequate for its planned production requirements over the next three to five years.

14

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        For further information on legal proceedings, see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the second, third, and fourth paragraphs of the environmental section in Item 1.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

        No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the last quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

15

16

PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.'S COMMON STOCK
AND RELATED SHARE OWNER MATTERS

        The price range for the Company's Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange, as reported by National Association of Securities Dealers, was as follows:

        The number of share owners of record on January 31, 2003 was 1,567. Approximately 70% of the outstanding shares were registered in the name of Depository Trust Company, or CEDE, which held such shares on behalf of 188 brokerage firms, banks, and other financial institutions. The shares attributed to these financial institutions, in turn, represented the interests of more than 25,000 unidentified beneficial owners. No dividends have been declared or paid since the Company's initial public offering in December 1991. For restrictions on payment of dividends on Common Stock, see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

17

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

        The selected consolidated financial data presented below relates to each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2002. The financial data was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company. For more information, see the "Consolidated Financial Statements" included elsewhere in this document.

        The Company's convertible preferred stock was not included in the computation of 2001, 1999 and 1998 diluted earnings per share since the result would have been antidilutive. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2000, diluted earnings per share of common stock are equal to basic earnings per share of common stock due to the net loss. The Company's exchangeable preferred stock was not included in the computation of 1998 diluted earnings per share since the result would have been antidilutive. Options to purchase 7,776,942, 3,357,449, and 1,160,667 weighted average shares of common stock which were outstanding during 2001, 1999, and 1998, respectively, were not included in

18

the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options' exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.

(a)

Results of operations and other data since April 1998 include the acquisition of the worldwide glass and plastics packaging businesses of BTR plc, and the related financings.

(b)

Other revenue in 2001 includes: (1) a gain of $457.3 million ($284.4 million after tax) related to the sale of the Harbor Capital Advisors business and (2) gains totaling $13.1 million ($12.0 million after tax) related to the sale of the label business and the sale of a minerals business in Australia.

Other revenue in 1999 includes gains totaling $40.8 million ($23.6 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) related to the sales of a U.S. glass container plant and a mold manufacturing business in Colombia.

Other revenue in 1998 includes: (1) a gain of $18.5 million ($11.4 million after tax) related to the termination of a license agreement, net of charges for related equipment write-offs and capacity adjustments, under which the Company had produced plastic multipack carriers for beverage cans and (2) a loss of $5.7 million ($3.5 million after tax) on the sale of a discontinued operation by an equity investee.

(c)

Amount for 2002 includes an adjustment of $475.0 million ($308.8 million after tax) to the reserve for estimated future asbestos-related costs.

Amount for 2001 includes: (1) charges of $82.1 million ($65.3 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) related to restructuring and impairment charges at certain of the Company's international glass operations, principally Venezuela and Puerto Rico, as well as certain other domestic and international operations; (2) a charge of $31.0 million (pretax and after tax) related to the loss on the sale of the Company's facilities in India; (3) charges of $30.9 million ($19.4 million after tax) related to special employee benefit programs; (4) a charge of $8.5 million ($5.3 million after tax) for certain contingencies; and (5) a charge of $7.9 million ($4.9 million after tax) related to restructuring manufacturing capacity in the medical devices business.

In 2000, the Company recorded pretax charges totaling $798.3 million ($513.1 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) for the following: (1) $550.0 million ($342.1 million after tax) related to adjustment of the reserve for estimated future asbestos-related costs; (2) $122.4 million ($77.3 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) related to the consolidation of manufacturing capacity; (3) a net charge of $52.4 million ($32.6 million after tax) related to early retirement incentives and special termination benefits for 350 United States salaried employees; (4) $40.0 million (pretax and after tax) related to the impairment of property, plant and equipment

19

at the Company's facilities in India; and (5) $33.5 million ($21.1 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) related principally to the write-off of software and related development costs.

Amount for 1999 includes charges totaling $20.8 million ($14.0 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) related principally to restructuring costs and write-offs of certain assets in Europe and Latin America.

In 1998, the Company recorded: (1) a charge of $250.0 million ($154.4 million after tax) related to adjustment of the reserve for estimated future asbestos-related costs; (2) charges of $72.6 million ($47.4 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) related principally to a plant closing in the United Kingdom and restructuring costs at certain international affiliates; and (3) a net charge of $0.9 million ($0.6 million after tax) for the settlement of certain environmental litigation and the reduction of previously established reserves for guarantees of certain obligations of a previously divested business.

(d)

Amount for 2001 includes a net interest charge of $4.0 million ($2.8 million after tax) related to interest on the resolution of the transfer of pension assets and liabilities for a previous acquisition and divestiture.

(e)

Amount for 2001 includes a $6.0 million charge to adjust tax liabilities in Italy as a result of recent legislation.

Amount for 2000 includes a benefit of $9.3 million to adjust net income tax liabilities in Italy as a result of recent legislation.

In 1998, the Company recorded a credit of $15.1 million to adjust net deferred income tax liabilities as a result of a reduction in Italy's statutory income tax rate.

(f)

In accordance with the adoption of FAS 145 on January 1, 2003 as noted in Note 1 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, these amounts will be reclassified to interest expense and the provision for income taxes.

(g)

On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("FAS No. 142"). As required by FAS No. 142, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and discontinued amortization of goodwill effective January 1, 2002. Also as required by FAS No. 142, the transitional goodwill impairment loss of $460.0 million is recognized as the cumulative effect of a change in method of accounting.

20

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

Comparison of 2002 with 2001

        For the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company recorded earnings before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change of $9.4 million compared to earnings before extraordinary items of $360.7 million for 2001. The net loss for 2002 of $460.2 million reflected $9.6 million of extraordinary charges from the early extinguishment of debt and $460.0 million from the cumulative effect of the change in accounting for goodwill. Net earnings of $356.6 million for 2001 reflected $4.1 million from an extraordinary charge from the early extinguishment of debt. Excluding the effects of the 2002 extraordinary items, cumulative effect of accounting change, and the unusual charge of $475.0 million for estimated future asbestos-related costs, the Company's 2002 net earnings of $318.2 million increased $26.9 million, or 9.2% from 2001 earnings, excluding extraordinary and unusual items and goodwill amortization (as discussed in the table below), of $291.3 million.

        The following tables lists unusual items (in millions of dollars) recorded in 2002 and 2001 and goodwill amortization for 2001, and their related effects on both EBIT and earnings before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting change. EBIT is defined as earnings before interest income, interest expense, provision for income taxes, minority share owners' interest in earnings of subsidiaries, extraordinary charges and cumulative effect of accounting change.

21

        Consolidated EBIT for 2002, excluding the asbestos-related charge, was $889.2 million, an increase of $32.6 million, or 3.8%, compared to 2001 EBIT, excluding unusual items and goodwill amortization, of $856.6 million. The increase was principally due to higher EBIT for the Glass Containers segment, partially offset by lower EBIT for the Plastics Packaging segment and lower EBIT from eliminations and other retained items, as further discussed below. Interest expense, net of interest income and the 2001 unusual expense of $4.0 million, decreased $5.5 million from 2001. The effects of lower short-term variable interest rates were partially offset by the first quarter 2002 issuance of $1.0 billion principal amount of 8⁷/8% Senior Secured Notes due 2009 and the fourth quarter 2002 issuance of 8³/4% Senior Secured Notes due 2012 totaling $625 million. Proceeds from the Senior Secured Notes were used to repay lower cost, variable rate debt borrowed under the Secured Credit Agreement. Excluding the effect of the asbestos-related charge, the Company's effective tax rate for 2002 was 30.1%. This compares with a rate of 30.3% for 2001, adjusted to exclude the effects of unusual items and goodwill amortization.

        Capsule segment results (in millions of dollars) for 2002 and 2001 were as follows (a) (certain amounts from the prior year have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation):

(a)

See Segment Information included in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b)

Eliminations and other retained items for 2002 included a charge of $475.0 million related to adjustment of the reserve for estimated future asbestos-related costs.

(c)

EBIT for 2001 included: (1) a gain of $457.3 million related to the sale of the Company's Harbor Capital Advisors business; (2) a $10.3 million gain from the sale of a minerals business in Australia; (3) a $2.8 million gain from the sale of the Company's label business; (4) charges of $82.1 million related to restructuring and impairment charges at certain of the Company's international glass operations, principally Venezuela and Puerto Rico, as well as certain other domestic and international operations; (5) a charge of $31.0 million related to the loss on the sale of the Company's facilities in India; (6) charges of $30.9 million related to special employee benefit programs; (7) a charge of $8.5 million for certain contingencies; and (8) a charge of $7.9 million related to restructuring manufacturing capacity in the medical devices business.

22

        Such charges (gains) are included as follows in consolidated EBIT for 2001 (in millions of dollars):

(d)

In accordance with FAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized beginning in 2002. In order to facilitate comparisons, goodwill amortization for 2001 has been reclassified out of the Glass Containers and Plastics Packaging segments and reported separately.

        Consolidated net sales for 2002 increased $237.9 million, or 4.4%, over the prior year. Net sales of the Glass Containers segment increased $302.9 million, or 8.5%, over 2001. In North America, the additional sales from the October 2001 acquisition of the Canadian glass container operations and increased shipments of containers for liquor and wine were partially offset by decreased shipments of containers for food, teas and juices. The combined U.S. dollar sales of the segment's other foreign affiliates increased 2.6% over the prior year. Increased shipments throughout most of the Asia Pacific region and portions of Europe were partially offset by the absence of the glass container operations in India (sold in 2001) and the effects of political and economic uncertainty in Venezuela. A national strike in Venezuela that began in early December 2002 caused energy supply curtailments that forced the Company to idle its two plants in the country, adversely affecting net sales by approximately $20 million. The effects of changing foreign currency exchange rates increased U.S. dollar sales of the segment's foreign affiliates in Europe and the Asia Pacific region by approximately $90 million and decreased U.S. dollar sales of the segment's foreign affiliates in South America by approximately $60 million. Net sales of the Plastics Packaging segment decreased $60.5 million, or 3.3%, from 2001. Increased shipments of plastic containers for food, bottled water, juice and health care and closures for food, juice and other beverages were more than offset by lower unit pricing in some product lines, the absence of sales from several small businesses divested during 2002 and the effects of lower resin costs on pass-through arrangements with customers. The effects of lower resin cost pass-throughs decreased sales approximately $14 million compared to 2001.

        Segment EBIT for 2002, excluding the effects of the 2002 and 2001 unusual items, increased $52.7 million, or 5.8%, to $967.2 million from the 2001 adjusted EBIT of $914.5 million, adjusted to exclude goodwill amortization. Consolidated operating expenses, excluding unusual items of $30.9 million for 2001, (consisting of selling and administrative, engineering, and research and development expenses) as a percentage of net sales were 7.1% in 2002 compared to 7.1% in 2001. EBIT of the Glass Containers segment increased $81.9 million to $709.0 million, compared to adjusted EBIT of $627.1 million in 2001. The combined U.S. dollar EBIT of the segment's foreign affiliates increased 7.7% over prior year. Increased shipments throughout most of the Asia Pacific region and portions of Europe and moderately improved pricing in Europe were partially offset by lower shipments in Brazil and Colombia, the national strike in Venezuela as discussed above and unfavorable currency translation rates throughout most of South America. In North America, Glass Container EBIT increased 9.7% over 2001 principally as a result of the Canadian glass container operations acquired early in the fourth quarter of 2001, moderately improved pricing and product mix, increased shipments of containers for liquor and wine and the recognition of the remaining deferred income associated with the early termination of an energy supply agreement, partially offset by the conversion of certain food and beverage containers to plastic packaging. EBIT of the Plastics Packaging segment decreased $29.0 million, or 10.1%, to $258.2 million compared to adjusted EBIT of $287.2 million in 2001. Increased shipments of plastic containers for food, bottled water, juice and health care and closures for food, juice and other beverages as well as improved manufacturing performance were more than offset

23

by lower unit pricing in some product lines, a $4.1 million unfavorable accounting adjustment at one of the segment's foreign affiliates largely due to the write down of inventories to net realizable value, and discontinued production for a major customer in the advanced technology systems business as the customer moves production from the U.S. to the Far East. The Company is commissioning a new factory in the Far East to continue to supply this customer and expects this new factory to be fully operational early in 2003. The Plastics Packaging segment operates in a number of highly competitive markets and has incurred significant pricing pressure during 2002 in some product lines which the Company expects to partially offset by increased unit volume, improved productivity and reduced costs.

        EBIT from eliminations and other retained items, excluding the 2002 and 2001 unusual items, decreased $20.1 million from 2001 reflecting lower net financial services income due to the sale of the Company's Harbor Capital Advisors business in the second quarter of 2001 as well as higher information systems spending during the year.

        Results for 2002 included a pretax charge of $475.0 million ($308.8 million after tax) related to the adjustment of the reserve for estimated future asbestos-related costs.

        The 2001 results included a net pretax gain of $310.0 million ($170.5 million after tax and minority share owners' interest) for the following: (1) a gain of $457.3 million ($284.4 million after tax) related to the sale of the Harbor Capital Advisors business; (2) gains totaling $13.1 million ($12.0 million after tax) related to the sale of the label business and the sale of a minerals business in Australia; (3) charges of $82.1 million ($65.3 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) related to restructuring and impairment charges at certain of the Company's international glass operations, principally Venezuela and Puerto Rico, as well as certain other domestic and international operations; (4) a charge of $31.0 million (pretax and after tax) related to the loss on the sale of the Company's facilities in India; (5) charges of $30.9 million ($19.4 million after tax) related to special employee benefit programs; (6) a charge of $8.5 million ($5.3 million after tax) for certain contingencies; and (7) a charge of $7.9 million ($4.9 million after tax) related to restructuring manufacturing capacity in the medical devices business.

Comparison of 2001 with 2000

        For the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company recorded earnings of $360.7 million before an extraordinary item, compared to a net loss of $269.7 million for 2000. Net earnings of $356.6 million for 2001 reflect $4.1 million of an extraordinary charge from the early extinguishment of debt. Excluding the effects of unusual items for both 2001 and 2000 discussed below, the Company's 2001 earnings of $199.0 million before extraordinary items decreased $35.1 million, or 15.0%, from 2000 earnings of $234.1 million.

        The 2001 results included the unusual items discussed above. The 2000 results included pretax charges totaling $798.3 million ($513.1 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) for the following: (1) $550.0 million ($342.1 million after tax) related to adjustment of the reserve for estimated future asbestos-related costs; (2) $122.4 million ($77.3 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) related to the consolidation of manufacturing capacity; (3) a net charge of $52.4 million ($32.6 million after tax) related to early retirement incentives and special termination benefits for 350 United States salaried employees; (4) $40.0 million (pretax and after tax) related to the impairment of property, plant and equipment at the Company's facilities in India; and (5) $33.5 million ($21.1 million after tax and minority share owners' interests) related principally to the write-off of software and related development costs.

        Consolidated EBIT, excluding unusual items, for 2001 was $764.3 million, a decrease of $96.6 million, or 11.2%, compared to 2000 EBIT, excluding unusual items, of $860.9 million. The decrease was attributable to lower EBIT for both the Glass Containers segment and the Plastics Packaging segment. Results of both segments are discussed further below. Interest expense, net of

24

interest income and unusual items, decreased $51.1 million from 2000 due principally to lower interest rates and decreased levels of debt. Exclusive of the adjustment for net income tax liabilities in Italy and other unusual items previously discussed, the Company's effective tax rate for 2001 was 38.1%. This compares with a rate of 36.9% for 2000, excluding the adjustment for net income tax liabilities in Italy and other unusual items. The increase in the 2001 rate compared to 2000 was primarily the result of decreased international and domestic tax benefits and credits.

        Capsule segment results (millions of dollars) for 2001 and 2000 were as follows (a):

(a)

See Segment Information included in Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b)

EBIT for 2001 included the unusual items as discussed in note (c) to the table of capsule segment results for 2002 and 2001.

(c)

EBIT for 2000 included charges totaling $798.3 million for the following: (1) $550.0 million related to adjustment of the reserve for estimated future asbestos-related costs; (2) $122.4 million related to the consolidation of manufacturing capacity; (3) a net charge of $52.4 million related to early retirement incentives and special termination benefits for 350 United States salaried employees; (4) $40.0 million related to the impairment of property, plant and equipment at the Company's facilities in India; and (5) $33.5 million related principally to the write-off of software and related development costs. These items were recorded in the third quarter of 2000. These items decreased segment EBIT as follows: Glass Containers—$186.0 million; Plastics Packaging—$11.2 million; Eliminations and other retained items—$601.1 million.

        Consolidated net sales for 2001 decreased $149.6 million, or 2.7%, from the prior year. Net sales of the Glass Containers segment decreased $124.4 million from 2000. In North America, the additional sales from the October 2001 acquisition of the Canadian operations were more than offset by decreased shipments of containers for beer producers and conversions of certain juice and iced tea from glass to plastic containers. The combined U.S. dollar sales of the segment's foreign affiliates decreased from the prior year. Increased shipments from the Company's operations throughout most of Europe and South America were more than offset by the effects of a strong U.S. dollar and lower shipments from the Company's operations in the United Kingdom and most of the Asia Pacific region. The effect of changing foreign currency exchange rates reduced U.S. dollar sales of the segment's foreign affiliates by approximately $140 million. Net sales of the Plastics Packaging segment increased $29.9 million, or 1.7%, over 2000, reflecting increased shipments of plastic containers and closures for food and health care, including prescription products, and the effects of higher resin costs on pass-through arrangements with customers, partially offset by lower shipments of plastic containers for

25

juice and other beverages and the effect of changing foreign currency exchange rates, principally in Australia. The effects of higher resin costs increased sales by approximately $32 million compared to 2000.

        Segment EBIT for 2001, excluding the 2001 and 2000 unusual items, decreased $15.3 million to $822.2 million, or 15.2% of net sales, from 2000 segment EBIT of $837.5 million, or 15.1% of net sales. Consolidated operating expenses, before 2001 unusual items of $30.9 million, as a percentage of net sales were 7.1% in 2001 compared to 6.5% in 2000. The increase in operating expenses was attributed to lower pension income and higher costs of certain employee benefit programs. EBIT of the Glass Containers segment decreased $4.7 million, or 0.8%, to $582.5 million, compared to $587.2 million in 2000. The combined U.S. dollar EBIT of the segment's foreign affiliates increased from prior year. Increased shipments from the Company's operations throughout most of Europe and South America were partially offset by the effects of a strong U.S. dollar, higher energy costs worldwide, and lower shipments from the Company's operations in the United Kingdom and most of the Asia Pacific region. In the United States, Glass Container EBIT decreased from 2000 principally due to higher energy costs, which were not fully recovered through price adjustments. EBIT of the Plastics Packaging segment decreased $1.3 million, or 0.5%, to $247.9 million, compared to $249.2 million in 2000. Increased shipments of plastic containers and closures for food and health care, including prescription products, were more than offset by lower shipments of plastic containers for juice and other beverages and one-time costs associated with the relocation of a U.S. manufacturing operation to a new and larger facility to accommodate a growing business base.

        Eliminations and other retained items, excluding the 2001 and 2000 unusual items, declined $81.3 million from 2000 reflecting lower net financial services income due to the sale of the Company's Harbor Capital Advisors business, higher spending on information systems, and certain employee benefit costs increases.

Restructuring and Impairment Charges

        The 2001 operating results included pretax charges of $90.0 million related to the following: (1) charges of $82.1 million principally related to a restructuring program and impairment at certain of the Company's international and domestic operations. The charge included the impairment of assets at the Company's affiliate in Puerto Rico and the consolidation of manufacturing capacity and the closing of a facility in Venezuela. The program also included consolidation of capacity at certain other international and domestic facilities in response to decisions about pricing and market strategy and (2) a charge of $7.9 million related to restructuring manufacturing capacity in the medical devices business. The Company substantially completed these restructuring programs during 2002. The cost savings from the 2001 restructuring programs were not material.

        The 2000 operating results included a pretax charge of $248.3 million, principally related to a restructuring and capacity realignment program. The restructuring and capacity realignment program, initiated in the third quarter of 2000, included the consolidation of manufacturing capacity and a reduction of 350 employees in the U.S. salaried work force, or about 10%, principally as a result of early retirement incentives. Also included in the charge was a write-down of plant and equipment for the Company's glass container affiliate in India and certain other asset write-offs, including $27.9 million for software which was abandoned. Manufacturing capacity consolidations principally involved U.S. glass container facilities and reflected technology-driven improvements in productivity, conversions of some juice and similar products to plastic containers, decisions regarding pricing and volume, and the further concentration of production in the most strategically-located facilities. The 2000 restructuring and capacity realignment program was substantially completed at the end of 2002.

26

Asbestos-Related Charge

        The asbestos-related charge of $475.0 million ($308.8 million after tax) represented an adjustment of the reserve for estimated future asbestos-related costs. Following the completion of a comprehensive review of its asbestos-related liabilities and costs in April 2002, the Company concluded that an increase in the reserve was required to provide for estimated indemnity payments and legal fees arising from asbestos personal injury lawsuits and claims expected to be filed in the next several years. Asbestos-related cash payments were $221.1 million for 2002, down from $245.9 million for 2001. The Company expects that asbestos-related cash payments will be moderately lower in 2003. The Company anticipates that cash flows from operations and other resources will be sufficient to meet all asbestos-related obligations.

        The Company believes that its ultimate asbestos-related contingent liability (i.e., its indemnity or other claim disposition costs plus related legal fees) cannot be estimated with certainty. The Company's ability to reasonably estimate its liability has been significantly affected by the volatility of asbestos-related litigation in the United States, the expanding list of non-traditional defendants that have been sued in this litigation and found liable for substantial damage awards, the continued use of litigation screenings to generate new lawsuits, the large number of claims asserted or filed by parties who claim prior exposure to asbestos materials but have no present physical impairment as a result of such exposure, and the growing number of co-defendants that have filed for bankruptcy.

        The Company continues to monitor trends which may affect its ultimate liability and has continued to analyze the developments and variables affecting or likely to affect the resolution of pending and future asbestos claims against the Company. As a result, the Company continues to evaluate trends to determine whether future adjustments of the asbestos-related liabilities may be appropriate.

        A former business unit of the Company produced a minor amount of specialized high-temperature insulation material containing asbestos from 1948 until 1958, when the business was sold. In line with its limited involvement with an asbestos-containing product and its exit from that business over 44 years ago, the Company will continue to work aggressively to minimize the number of incoming cases and to limit payments to only those impaired claimants who were exposed to the Company's products and whose claims have merit under applicable state law. As of December 31, 2002, the number of pending asbestos-related claimants and plaintiffs decreased to approximately 24,000 from the previously reported level of approximately 27,000 at December 31, 2001. See Note 19 to the consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

        The Company's total debt at December 31, 2002 was $5.35 billion, compared to $5.40 billion at December 31, 2001.

        During April 2001, certain of the Company's subsidiaries entered into the Secured Credit Agreement (the "Agreement") with a group of banks, which expires on March 31, 2004. The Agreement provides for a $2.4 billion ($3.0 billion initially) revolving credit facility. The Agreement also initially provided for a $1.5 billion term loan which was repaid with the proceeds from the 2001 sale of the Company's Harbor Capital Advisors business and the issuance of Senior Secured Notes in 2002 as discussed below.

        At December 31, 2002, the Company had available credit totaling $2.450 billion under the Agreement, of which $520.9 million had not been utilized. At December 31, 2001, the Company had $491.4 million of credit which had not been utilized under the Agreement. Cash provided by operating activities was $603.1 million for 2002 compared to $538.1 million for 2001.

        During January 2002, a subsidiary of the Company issued $1.0 billion of Senior Secured Notes. The notes bear interest at 8⁷/8% and are due February 15, 2009. The notes are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries. The assets of substantially all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries are pledged as security for the notes. The issuing subsidiary used the net cash

27

proceeds from the notes to reduce the outstanding term loan under the Agreement by $980 million. As a result, the Company wrote off unamortized deferred financing fees in January 2002 related to the term loan and recorded an extraordinary charge of $10.9 million less applicable income taxes of $4.2 million. The indenture for the notes restricts, among other things, the ability of the Company's subsidiaries to borrow money, pay dividends on, or redeem or repurchase stock, make investments, create liens, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, and sell certain assets or merge with or into other companies.

        During the fourth quarter of 2002, a subsidiary of the Company issued Senior Secured Notes totaling $625 million. The notes bear interest at 8³/4% and are due November 15, 2012. The notes are guaranteed by substantially all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries. The assets of substantially all of the Company's domestic subsidiaries are pledged as security for the notes. The issuing subsidiary used the net cash proceeds from the notes to repay the remaining $65 million of the outstanding term loan under the Agreement and to permanently reduce the revolving credit facility under the Agreement by $551 million. As a result, the Company wrote off unamortized deferred financing fees related to the term loan and the revolver and recorded an extraordinary charge of $4.5 million less applicable income taxes of $1.6 million. The indenture for the new notes has the same restrictions as the Senior Secured Notes issued in January 2002.

        The $1.625 billion of Senior Secured Notes noted above that were issued during 2002 are part of the Company's plan to obtain longer term financing by issuing long term fixed rate debt. While this strategy extends the maturity of the Company's debt, the long-term fixed rate debt increases the cost of borrowing over the shorter term, variable rate debt. The Company expects that the higher cost debt will add approximately $25 million to interest expense in 2003. In 2003, the Company expects to continue refinancing its existing debt, including the Agreement, which may include the replacement of more of its shorter term, lower cost, variable rate debt with longer term, higher cost, fixed rate debt.

        The Agreement contains covenants and provisions that, among other things, restrict the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to dispose of assets, incur additional indebtedness, prepay other indebtedness or amend certain debt instruments, pay dividends, create liens on assets, enter into contingent obligations, enter into sale and leaseback transactions, make investments, loans or advances, make acquisitions, engage in mergers or consolidations, change the business conducted, or engage in certain transactions with affiliates and otherwise restrict certain corporate activities. In addition, the Agreement contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain specified financial ratios and meet specified tests based upon financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, including minimum fixed charge coverage ratios, maximum leverage ratios, minimum net worth and specified capital expenditure tests.

        The Company anticipates that cash flow from its operations and from utilization of credit available through March 2004 under the Agreement will be sufficient to fund its operating and seasonal working capital needs, debt service and other obligations. The Company expects that its total asbestos-related payments in 2003 will be moderately lower than 2002. Based on the Company's expectations regarding future payments for lawsuits and claims and also based on the Company's expected operating cash flow, the Company believes that the payment of any deferred amounts of previously settled or otherwise determined lawsuits and claims, and the resolution of presently pending and anticipated future lawsuits and claims associated with asbestos, will not have a material adverse effect upon the Company's liquidity on a short-term or long-term basis.

28

        The following information summarizes the Company's significant contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2002 (millions of dollars).

Critical Accounting Estimates

        The Company's analysis and discussion of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon its consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("U.S. GAAP"). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, including but not limited to those related to pension benefit plans, contingencies and litigation, and goodwill. Estimates and assumptions are based on historical and other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of these estimates may form the basis of the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities and may not be readily apparent from other sources. Actual results, under conditions and circumstances different from those assumed, may differ from estimates. The impact and any associated risks related to estimates and assumptions are discussed within Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, if applicable, where estimates and assumptions affect the Company's reported and expected financial results.

        The Company believes that accounting for pension benefit plans, contingencies and litigation, and goodwill involves the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

Pension Benefit Plans

        Because of their historically well-funded status, the Company's principal defined benefit pension plans contributed pretax credits to earnings of approximately $83.5 million for 2002 and approximately $97.0 million for 2001. The 2002 decrease in pretax pension credits is attributed to lower expected return on assets and the addition of pension obligations with the acquisition of the Canadian glass container assets of Consumers Packaging Inc.

        The determination of pension obligations and the related pension credits involves significant estimates. The most significant estimates are the discount rate used to calculate the actuarial present

29

value of benefit obligations and the expected long-term rate of return on assets used in calculating the pension credits for the year. The Company uses a discount rate based on yields of highly rated fixed income debt securities at the end of the year. At December 31, 2002, the weighted average discount rate for all plans was 6.52%. The Company uses an expected long-term rate of return that is based on the past performance of the various plans' assets and an estimate of the future performance of the assets. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the weighted average expected long-term rate of return for all plans was 9.64%.

        Declines in the stock market over the last few years have reduced the fair value of the Company's pension plan assets, which, in turn, has caused reduced credits to earnings. In 2003, the Company also expects to reduce its assumed rate of return on pension assets to a weighted average expected long-term rate of approximately 8.75%. The lower assumed rate, combined with a lower asset base, will cause the pretax credits to earnings to be substantially lower for the full year of 2003 as compared to 2002. The Company expects that these credits will be approximately $50 million, or 60%, lower in 2003 than for 2002.

        Future effects on reported results of operations depend on economic conditions and investment performance. For example, a one-half percentage point change in the actuarial assumption regarding the expected return on assets would result in a change of approximately $15 million in pretax pension credits for the full year. In addition, changes in external factors, including the fair values of plan assets and the discount rate used to calculate plan liabilities, could result in possible future balance sheet recognition of additional minimum pension liabilities.

        The Company's principal pension plan in the United Kingdom had an accumulated benefit obligation ("ABO") which exceeded the fair value of the plan's assets at December 31, 2002. As a result, the Company eliminated the prepaid pension asset related to that plan and recorded, as of December 31, 2002, a minimum pension liability of $92.2 million, an intangible asset of $12.1 million, and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $130.7 million.

        At December 31, 2002, the Company's principal pension plans in the United States and Australia had plan assets with fair values in excess of each plan's ABO. If the ABO of these plans exceeds the fair value of their assets at December 31, 2003, the Company will be required to write off most of its prepaid pension asset ($925.5 million at December 31, 2002) and record a liability equal to the excess of the ABO over the fair value of the assets. The noncash charge would result in a decrease in the Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income component of share owners' equity that would significantly reduce net worth.

Contingencies and Litigation

        The Company believes that its ultimate asbestos-related contingent liability (i.e., its indemnity or other claim disposition costs plus related legal fees) cannot be estimated with certainty. The Company's ability to reasonably estimate its liability has been significantly affected by the volatility of asbestos-related litigation in the United States, the expanding list of non-traditional defendants that have been sued in this litigation and found liable for substantial damage awards, the continued use of litigation screenings to generate new lawsuits, the large number of claims asserted or filed by parties who claim prior exposure to asbestos materials but have no present physical impairment as a result of such exposure, and the growing number of co-defendants that have filed for bankruptcy. The Company believes that the bankruptcies of additional co-defendants have resulted in an acceleration of the presentation and disposition of a number of claims, which would otherwise have been presented and disposed of over the next several years. The Company continues to monitor trends which may affect its ultimate liability and continues to analyze the developments and variables affecting or likely to affect the resolution of pending and future asbestos claims against the Company.

        The Company expects to complete a comprehensive review of its asbestos-related liabilities and costs in connection with finalizing and reporting its results for 2003, and annually thereafter, unless significant changes in trends or new developments warrant an earlier review. If the results of this

30

annual comprehensive review indicate that the existing amount of the accrued liability is insufficient to cover its estimated liabilities, then the Company will record an appropriate charge to increase the accrual. The Company's estimates are based on a number of factors as described further in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Goodwill

        Beginning in 2002, the Company will evaluate goodwill annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment. Goodwill impairment testing is performed using the business enterprise value ("BEV") of each reporting unit which is calculated as of a measurement date by determining the present value of debt-free, after tax future cash flows, discounted at the weighted average cost of capital of a hypothetical third party buyer. This BEV is then compared to the book value of each reporting unit as of the measurement date to assess whether an impairment exists. The annual impairment testing performed as of October 1, 2002 indicated that there was no impairment of any of the reporting units of the Company.

        If the Company's projected debt-free, after tax cash flows were substantially lower, or if the assumed weighted average cost of capital were substantially higher, the testing may have indicated an impairment of one or more reporting units and, as a result, the related goodwill would have been written down. However, based on the Company's testing as of October 1, 2002, modest changes in the projected cash flows or cost of capital would not create impairment in reporting units. For example, if projected debt-free, after tax cash flows were decreased by 5%, or alternatively if the weighted average cost of capital were increased by 5%, the resulting lower BEV's would still exceed the book value of each reporting unit and no impairment would exist. In the event the Company would be required to record a significant write down of goodwill, the charge would have a material adverse effect on reported results of operations and net worth.

ITEM 7.(A). QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

        Market risks relating to the Company's operations result primarily from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in interest rates, and changes in commodity prices, principally natural gas. The Company uses certain derivative instruments to mitigate a portion of the risk associated with changing foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuating natural gas prices.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

        A substantial portion of the Company's operations consists of manufacturing and sales activities conducted by affiliates in foreign jurisdictions. The primary foreign markets served by the Company's affiliates are in Australia, South America (principally Colombia, Brazil and Venezuela), and Europe (principally Italy, the United Kingdom, and Poland). In general, revenues earned and costs incurred by the Company's major foreign affiliates are denominated in their respective local currencies. Consequently, the Company's reported financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or highly inflationary economic conditions in the foreign markets in which the Company's affiliates operate. When the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the reported dollar value of local currency EBIT generally decreases; when the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the reported U.S. dollar value of local currency EBIT generally increases.

        Subject to other business and tax considerations, the Company's strategy is to generally redeploy any affiliates' available excess funds through intercompany loans to other affiliates for debt repayment, capital investment, or other cash requirements. Each intercompany loan is denominated in the lender's local currency and the borrower enters into a forward exchange contract which effectively swaps the intercompany loan and related interest to its local currency.

        Because the Company's foreign affiliates operate within their local economic environment, the Company believes it is appropriate to finance those operations with local currency borrowings to the extent practicable where debt financing is required. Considerations which influence the amount of such

31

borrowings include long- and short-term business plans, tax implications, and the availability of borrowings with acceptable interest rates and terms. In those countries where the local currency is the designated functional currency, this strategy mitigates the risk of reported losses or gains in the event the foreign currency strengthens or weakens against the U.S. dollar. In those countries where the U.S. dollar is the designated functional currency, however, local currency borrowings expose the Company to reported losses or gains in the event the foreign currency strengthens or weakens against the U.S. dollar.

        The Company's Secured Credit Agreement requires that all borrowings other than borrowings under certain limited overdraft facilities, be denominated in U.S. dollars. As of December 31, 2002, U.S. dollar amounts outstanding under the Agreement borrowed by foreign affiliates were:

        A significant portion of the above borrowings and of the intercompany loans have been swapped into local currencies using currency swaps. The Company accounts for these swaps as fair value hedges. As a result, the changes in the value of the swaps are included in other expense and are expected to substantially offset any exchange rate gains or losses on the related U.S. dollar borrowings.

        As of December 31, 2002, the Company's affiliate in Australia has swapped $650 million of borrowings into $1,275 million Australian dollars. This swap matures on May 1, 2003, with interest resets every 90 days. The interest reset terms of the swap approximate the terms of the U.S. dollar borrowings. This derivative instrument swaps both the interest and principal from U.S. dollars to Australian dollars and also swaps the interest rate from a U.S.-based rate to an Australian-based rate. The Company's affiliate in the United Kingdom has swapped $200 million of bank loans and intercompany borrowings into 139 million British pounds. This swap also matures on May 1, 2003, with interest resets every 90 days. This derivative instrument swaps both the interest and principal from U.S. dollars to British pounds and also swaps the interest rate from a U.S.-based rate to a British-based rate. The Company's affiliates in Australia and in the United Kingdom have also entered in short term forward exchange contracts which effectively swap additional intercompany and external borrowings at each of these affiliates to its local currency. These hedges swap both the interest and principal of additional borrowings in excess of the two major swap contracts mentioned above.

        As of December 31, 2002, the Company's Canadian affiliate has swapped $60 million of borrowings into $94.7 million Canadian dollars. This swap matures on October 1, 2003. This derivative instrument swaps both the interest and principal from U.S. dollars to Canadian dollars and also swaps the interest rate from a U.S.-based rate to a Canadian-based rate.

        The remaining portion of the Company's consolidated debt which was denominated in foreign currencies was not significant.

        The Company believes it does not have material foreign currency exchange rate risk related to local currency denominated financial instruments (i.e. cash, short-term investments, and long-term debt) of its foreign affiliates.

Interest Rate Risk

        The Company's interest expense is most sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates applicable to its U.S. dollar indebtedness. To mitigate the impact of fluctuations in variable interest rates, the Company could, at its option, convert to fixed interest rates by either refinancing variable rate debt with fixed rate debt or entering into interest rate swaps.

32

        The following table provides information about the Company's significant interest rate risk at December 31, 2002.

Commodity Risk

        The Company is exposed to fluctuations of various commodity prices, most significantly the changes in prices related to natural gas. The Company purchases a significant amount of natural gas at nationally quoted market prices. The Company uses commodity futures contracts related to a portion of its forecasted natural gas requirements. The objective of these futures contracts is to limit the fluctuations in prices paid and the potential volatility in earnings or cash flows from future market price movements. The Company continually evaluates the natural gas market in respect to its future usage requirements. The Company generally evaluates the natural gas market for the next twelve months and continually enters into commodity futures contracts in order to have a portion of its usage requirements hedged through the next twelve months. At December 31, 2002, the Company has entered into commodity futures contracts for approximately 25% of its North American natural gas usage through the end of 2003 (approximately 6,600 MM BTUs).

        At December 31, 2002, an unrealized net gain of $2.2 million, after tax of $1.2 million, related to these commodity futures contracts was included in Other Comprehensive Income. There was no ineffectiveness recognized during 2002.

Forward Looking Statements

        This document may contain "forward looking" statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933. Forward looking statements reflect the Company's current expectations and projections about future events at the time, and thus involve uncertainty and risk. It is possible the Company's future financial performance may differ from expectations due to a variety of factors including, but not limited to the following: (1) foreign currency fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar, (2) changes in capital availability or cost, including interest rate fluctuations, (3) the general political, economic and competitive conditions in markets and countries where the Company has operations, including disruptions in the supply chain, competitive pricing pressures, inflation or deflation, and changes in tax rates and laws, (4) consumer preferences for alternative forms of packaging, (5) fluctuations in raw material and labor costs, (6) availability of raw materials, (7) costs and availability of energy, (8) transportation costs, (9) consolidation among competitors and customers, (10) the ability of the Company to integrate operations of acquired businesses, (11) unanticipated expenditures with respect to environmental, safety and health laws, (12) the performance by customers of their obligations under purchase agreements, and (13) the timing and occurrence of events which are beyond the control of the Company, including

33

events related to asbestos-related claims. It is not possible to foresee or identify all such factors. Any forward looking statements in this document are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by the Company in light of its experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments, and other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. Forward looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from expectations. While the Company continually reviews trends and uncertainties affecting the Company's results of operations and financial condition, the Company does not intend to update any particular forward looking statements contained in this document.

34

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

35

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Share Owners
Owens-Illinois, Inc.

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Owens-Illinois, Inc. as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of results of operations, share owners' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14.(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Owens-Illinois, Inc. at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

        As discussed in Note 1 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in 2002 the Company changed its accounting for goodwill.

Ernst & Young LLP

Toledo, Ohio
January 23, 2003

36

Owens-Illinois, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(Millions of dollars, except per share amounts)