Back to GetFilings.com

Use these links to rapidly review the document
CONTENTS
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Commission File Number 001-31308

Tom Brown, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes o    No o

        The aggregate market value of the Registrant's Common Stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the last sale price of $24.75 per share as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange) on March 11, 2003 was approximately $975,122,849.

        As of March 11, 2003, there were 39,398,903 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

        Portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 8, 2003 are incorporated by reference into Part III.

TOM BROWN, INC.

FORM 10-K

CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1. Business

GENERAL

        Tom Brown, Inc. (the "Company") was organized in 1955 as a privately-owned drilling company known as Scarber-Brown Drilling Company and in 1959 as Tom Brown Drilling Company, Inc. In 1968, the Company merged into Gold Metals Consolidated Mining Company, a publicly-traded Nevada corporation. The name of the Company after the merger was changed to Tom Brown Drilling Company, Inc. and to Tom Brown, Inc. in 1971. In February 1987, the Company changed its state of incorporation from Nevada to Delaware. In 1999, the Company relocated its headquarters and executive offices to 555 Seventeenth Street, Suite 1850, Denver, Colorado 80202 and its telephone number at that address is (303) 260-5000. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to the "Company" include Tom Brown, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

        The Company is engaged primarily in the exploration for, and the acquisition, development, production, marketing, and sale of, natural gas, natural gas liquids and crude oil in North America. The Company's activities are conducted principally in the Wind River and Green River Basins of Wyoming, the Piceance Basin of Colorado, the Paradox Basin of Utah and Colorado, the Val Verde Basin and Permian Basin of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico, the east Texas Basin and the westernCanadian Sedimentary Basin. The Company also, to a lesser extent, conducts exploration and development activities in other areas of the continental United States and Canada.

        In December 2000, the Company initiated a cash tender for all the outstanding stock of Stellarton Energy Corporation ("Stellarton"). This transaction was completed on January 12, 2001.

        The Company's industry segments are (i) the exploration for, and the acquisition, development and production of, natural gas, natural gas liquids and crude oil, (ii) the marketing, gathering, processing and sale of natural gas and (iii) the drilling of gas and oil wells.

        Except for its gas and oil leases with governmental entities and other third parties who enter into gas and oil leases or assignments with the Company in the regular course of its business and options to purchase gas and oil leases with the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes, the Company has no material patents, licenses, franchises or concessions which it considers significant to its gas and oil operations.

        The nature of the Company's business is such that it does not maintain or require a substantial amount of products, customer orders or inventory. The Company's gas and oil operations are not subject to renegotiations of profits or termination of contracts at the election of the federal government.

        The Company has not been a party to any bankruptcy, receivership, reorganization or similar proceeding, except in connection with its participation as a joint proponent of a plan of reorganization for Presidio Oil Company in 1996.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

        The Company's business strategy is to increase stockholder value through the discovery, acquisition and development of long-lived gas and oil reserves in areas where the Company has industry knowledge and operations expertise. The Company's principal investments have been in natural gas prone basins, which the Company believes will continue to provide the opportunity to accumulate significant long-lived gas and oil reserves at attractive prices. The expansion into Canada in 2001 was an extension of this fundamental strategy.

        The Company's year-end domestic acreage position was approximately 2,677,000 gross (1,773,000 net) acres (including options) located primarily in the Wind River and Green River Basins of Wyoming, the Piceance Basin of Colorado, the Paradox Basin of Colorado and Utah, and the Permian, Val Verde and east Texas Basins of Texas where the Company can utilize its geological and technical expertise and its control of operations for the further development and expansion of these areas. Approximately 89% of the net acreage is undeveloped.

        The Company's year-end Canadian acreage position located in western Alberta was approximately 540,000 gross (359,000 net) acres. Approximately 78% of the net acreage is undeveloped.

        Additionally, by staying focused in its core basins, the Company continues to develop more effective drilling and completion techniques which can improve overall economic efficiency.

        The Company increased its reserves in 2002 over 2001 by 2% due primarily to continued drilling success in its core areas. Year-end proved reserves were 750 billion cubic feet equivalent ("Bcfe"), compared to year-end 2001 reserves of 732 Bcfe. At December 31, 2002, the Canadian reserve base was 82 Bcfe compared to 77 Bcfe at December 31, 2001. Since December 31, 1995, the Company has increased proved reserves at a compounded annual growth rate of 22%, or from 188 Bcfe to 750 Bcfe.

        Reserve replacement for 2002 was 137% from all sources and 119% from extensions, discoveries and revisions only. Finding cost was $1.32 per Mcfe for the year from all sources and a 3-year average finding cost of $1.29 per Mcfe. The Company's reserve to production ratio was 8.8 years at year-end 2002 compared to 9.6 years at year-end 2001. In addition to increasing reserves, the Company also increased its production 12% from 76.4 Bcfe in 2001 to 85.5 Bcfe in 2002.

        The Company markets a majority of its operated gas production and some third party gas in the Rocky Mountains through Retex, Inc. ("Retex"), the Company's wholly-owned marketing subsidiary.

        The Company also conducts gas gathering and processing activities in the Rocky Mountain area. Initially, these functions were conducted through Wildhorse Energy Partners, LLC ("Wildhorse") which was owned 55% by Kinder Morgan, Inc. ("KM") and 45% by the Company. In November 2000, the Wildhorse gathering and processing assets were distributed to the Company in anticipation of the dissolution of Wildhorse. KM received the Wildhorse storage facility and a cash payment. TBI Field Services, Inc. ("TBIFS") was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tom Brown, Inc. to administer these gathering and processing assets. In 2001, TBIFS selectively sold many of the gathering and processing facilities received in the Wildhorse asset distribution, retaining only those gathering systems considered integral to the Company's gas and oil reserve base. As the Company directly owns and operates several gas processing and gathering systems adjacent to its areas of operations, the systems ultimately retained by TBIFS after the Wildhorse dissolution were merged into the Company's operations in 2002 and TBIFS ceased to function as a separate entity.

        The Company plans to continue to selectively pursue acquisitions of gas and oil properties in its core areas of activity and, in connection therewith, the Company from time to time will be involved in evaluations of, or discussions with, potential acquisition candidates. The consideration for any such acquisition might involve the payment of cash and/or the issuance of equity or debt securities.

        Notwithstanding the Company's historical ability to implement the above strategy, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully implement its strategy in the future.

AREAS OF ACTIVITY

        The following discussion focuses on areas the Company considers to be its core areas of operations and those that offer the Company the greatest opportunities for further exploration and development activities.

Wind River, Green River, Paradox, and Piceance Basins

        The Wind River and Green River Basins of Wyoming, the Piceance Basin of Colorado, and the Paradox Basin of Colorado and Utah account for the major portion of the Company's current and anticipated domestic exploration and development activities with approximately 74% of the Company's proved reserves at December 31, 2002. The Company owns interests in 1,278 producing wells in these basins that averaged net daily production of 159 Mmcfe for 2002. The Company has approximately 1,565,000 gross (1,224,000 net) developed and undeveloped acres in these basins, including option acreage of approximately 281,000 gross undeveloped (253,000 net) acres in the Wind River Basin.

        In 2002, the Company drilled and completed 16 wells in the Wind River basin, the majority of which were located in the Pavillion field where the Company holds a 92% working interest. In the Piceance basin, the Company drilled 26 wells in 2002 (completing 25). The Piceance wells were principally drilled at the Company's 100% owned White River Dome coal bed methane project in western Colorado.

        The Rocky Mountain region has experienced limited natural gas transportation capacity. Recognizing these restrictions, various pipelines have constructed lines and are continuing to add additional pipeline capacity into this area.

Permian and Val Verde Basins

        The Permian and Val Verde Basins accounted for approximately 9% of the Company's proved reserves at December 31, 2002. The Company's share of production from these basins averaged 28 Mmcfepd for 2002. The Company holds between 30% to 50% working interests in approximately 46,800 gross (20,300 net) acres in the Val Verde Basin. The Permian Basin contains significant oil reserves for the Company, located primarily in the Sprayberry Field.

        In the Deep Valley exploration project area of the Permian Basin, the Company drilled a horizontal Montoya well in 2001 which tested non-commercial in the Montoya formation but will be tested in the Devonian formation in 2003. In 2002, the Company successfully completed a Devonian well in this area with a 50% working interest that commenced production in June 2002 at initial rates approximating 10 Mmcfepd declining to 2.5 Mmcfepd in early 2003. Two wells were drilled subsequent to this discovery in 2002 that are currently being evaluated. The Company also attempted a horizontal re-entry in Deep Valley to test the Devonian section of a well in 2002 that was unsuccessful.

East Texas Basin

        The Company participates in a continuing developmental drilling program in the Mimms Creek Field (Bossier Sands play) in Freestone County, Texas. During 2002, 11 wells were drilled and completed under this program, with the Company owning working interests ranging from 50% to 62.5%.

        In recent years, the Company has acquired approximately 80,000 net acres in the James Lime (horizontal) Trend of the east Texas Basin. In 2001, the Company drilled seven wells in the James Lime (horizontal) Trend of which five were initially completed. This large regional play is in its early stages of development and the Company is working to determine its potential based upon the initial production rates and variable decline rates of the wells drilled to date.

Canada

        The western Canadian Sedimentary Basin accounted for approximately 11% of the Company's proved reserves at December 31, 2002. The Company's share of production from these basins averaged 24 Mmcfepd in 2002. The Company owns interests in 252 wells and has approximately 540,000 gross (359,000 net) developed and undeveloped acres in this area. In 2002, the Company drilled 13 wells in Canada of which 12 were completed. These wells were primarily located in the Carrot Creek and Edson fields operated by the Company.

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENTS

Current Developments in the Gas and Oil Business

Acquisition of Stellarton Energy Corporation

        Effective January 16, 2001, the Company purchased 100% of Stellarton Energy Corporation ("Stellarton"), in a transaction valued at $95 million, which was funded through a five-year Canadian term loan. Stellarton's assets are located in western Alberta, Canada with estimated total net proved reserves (after royalty) of 58.8 billion cubic feet (Bcf) of gas and 2.82 million barrels of oil and natural gas liquids for total equivalent proved reserves of 75.5 Bcfe, as of the date of this acquisition.

Acquisition of Rocky Mountain Assets

        In June 2002, the Company purchased certain Rocky Mountain assets located within the Greater Green River Basin of Wyoming for approximately $8.1 million from an undisclosed seller. In December 2002, the Company acquired additional assets within this basin from this seller for $6.8 million. The acquisition cost of both of these transactions was net of normal closing adjustments. The acquired interests from these two transactions included an estimated 12.7 Bcfe of proved reserves.

        In June 2000, the Company purchased an additional working interest in the Company operated Pavillion Field in the Wind River Basin in Wyoming. The acquired interests included an estimated 24 Bcfe of proved reserves purchased for total consideration of $15.2 million net of normal closing adjustments.

Acquisition of the Assets of Unocal Corporation

        In July 1999, the Company completed an acquisition of substantially all of the Rocky Mountain oil and gas assets of Unocal Corporation ("Unocal") for 5.8 million shares of common stock and $5 million in cash for a total purchase price of $68.5 million ($60.9 million after deducting normal purchase price adjustments).

        The Unocal oil and gas assets are primarily located in the Paradox Basin of southwestern Colorado and southeastern Utah. These assets and properties compliment the Company's 163,000 net undeveloped acres in the Paradox Basin.

        Included in the acquisition was the Lisbon Plant, a modern sophisticated cryogenic (60 million cubic feet per day capacity) natural gas processing plant that extracts natural gas liquids and merchantable helium; and separates carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and nitrogen from the raw gas stream. The net proved reserves of these Unocal properties were estimated to be 93.2 billion cubic feet equivalent of gas as of the closing date of July 1, 1999. Approximately 65,000 net undeveloped acres were also acquired.

Current Developments in the Marketing, Gathering and Processing Business

        In September 1999, KM became the operator of, and 55% partner in, Wildhorse as a result of a merger with KN Energy, Inc. ("KNE"). Wildhorse was formed in connection with the Company's 1996 acquisition of KN Production Company, the wholly-owned oil and gas production subsidiary of KNE. Wildhorse was created to provide services related to natural gas, natural gas liquids and other natural gas products, including gathering, processing and storage services and field services. The Company owned 45% of Wildhorse since its inception. Effective September 1, 1999, Wildhorse assigned 100% of its marketing operations to Retex, the Company's wholly-owned marketing subsidiary. Additionally, firm transportation contracts were assigned 55% to KM and 45% remained in Retex. In November 2000, the Wildhorse gathering and processing assets were distributed to the Company in anticipation of the dissolution of Wildhorse. KM received the Wildhorse storage facility and a cash payment. "TBIFS" was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tom Brown, Inc. to administer the gathering and processing assets received in this distribution.

        In 2001, TBIFS selectively sold many of the gathering and processing facilities received in the Wildhorse asset distribution. The principal asset retained in this process was the Wind River gathering system in one of the Company's core areas. In 2002, the Company liquidated TBIFS and transferred the remaining gathering and processing assets to Tom Brown, Inc.

Current Developments in the Drilling Business

Acquisition of Assets of W. E. Sauer Companies, LLC

        On January 7, 1998, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the drilling assets of W. E. Sauer Companies L.L.C. of Casper, Wyoming for approximately $8.1 million. The Company operates the assets in its subsidiary, Sauer Drilling Company ("Sauer"), and plans to continue to serve the drilling needs of operators in the central Rocky Mountain region in addition to drilling for the Company. The assets included five drilling rigs, tubular goods, a yard and related assets. Subsequent to the acquisition, Sauer has acquired three additional drilling rigs for approximately $4 million.

MARKETS

        The Company's gas production has historically been sold primarily under month-to-month contracts with marketing companies and local distribution companies (LDC's). During 2001 and 2002, there was a significant amount of volatility in the prices received for natural gas. Monthly closing gas prices in 2001 as measured on the New York Mercantile Exchange ("NYMEX") varied from a high of $9.98 per million British thermal unit ("Mmbtu") for January 2001 to a low of $1.83 per Mmbtu for October 2001. In 2002, the NYMEX gas prices varied from a high of $4.14 per Mmbtu in December 2002 to a low of $2.01 per Mmbtu in February 2002. The U.S. Rocky Mountain region represented approximately 68% of the Company's 2002 gas production and 66% of its 2001 production. The price of gas in the Rocky Mountains at the Colorado Interstate Gas (CIG) hub was $1.25 and $.77 per Mmbtu below the NYMEX posted gas price on average for 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Company's Canadian production base has also been subject to price volatility. In 2001, gas production from the Canadian fields was subject to gas pricing that ranged from $1.10 per Mmbtu above the February 2001 NYMEX price to a price that was $.98 per Mmbtu below the October 2001 NYMEX price. In 2002, the Canadian gas prices continued to be volatile ranging from $.12 per Mmbtu below the NYMEX posting for February 2002 to $1.24 below the August 2002 NYMEX price.

        The Company markets most of its oil production with independent third-party resellers and refiners at market ("posted") prices. These posted prices generally reflect the prices determined by the trading of West Texas Intermediate ("WTI") oil futures contracts on the NYMEX, with adjustments due to basis differential and for the quality of oil produced.

        NYMEX prices for both gas and oil are influenced by weather, seasonal demand, levels of storage, production levels and a variety of political and economic factors over which the Company has no control.

Production Volumes, Unit Prices and Costs

        The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company's volumes of production sold and average prices received associated with its production and sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and crude oil for each of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.

(1)

Includes the effects of hedging.

(2)

Includes lease operating expenses and production taxes. (Mcfe means one thousand cubic feet of natural gas equivalent, calculated on the basis of six barrels of oil and natural gas liquids to one Mcf of gas.)

Competition

        The Company encounters strong competition from major oil companies and independent operators in acquiring properties and leases for the exploration for, and the development and production of, natural gas and crude oil. Competition is particularly intense with respect to the acquisition of desirable undeveloped gas and oil leases. The principal competitive factors in the acquisition of undeveloped gas and oil leases include the availability and quality of staff and data necessary to identify, investigate and purchase such leases, and the financial resources necessary to acquire and develop such leases. Many of the Company's competitors have financial resources, staffs and facilities substantially greater than those of the Company. In addition, the producing, processing and marketing of natural gas and crude oil is affected by a number of factors which are beyond the control of the Company, the effect of which cannot be accurately predicted.

        The principal raw materials and resources necessary for the exploration and development of natural gas and crude oil are leasehold prospects under which gas and oil reserves may be discovered, drilling rigs and related equipment to drill for and produce such reserves and knowledgeable personnel to conduct all phases of gas and oil operations. The Company must compete for such raw materials and resources with both major oil companies and independent operators.

        Retex encounters competition from other natural gas transportation and marketing entities in the marketing of gas. Such competition may materially affect the volumes and margins that Retex may derive.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

        On January 19, 2001, Donald L. Evans, the Company's Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer resigned to accept an appointment as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce. The Company's Board of Directors elected James B. Wallace as the new Chairman of the Board and James D. Lightner to the additional position of Chief Executive Officer in 2001 following Mr. Evans resignation. At the annual stockholder's meeting in May 2002, James D. Lightner was elected to replace Mr. Wallace as the new Chairman of the Board.

        The executive officers of the Company on March 18, 2003 were as follows:

        Each executive officer is elected annually by the Company's Board of Directors to serve at the Board's discretion.

Employees

        At December 31, 2002, the Company had 429 employees of which 103 were employed by Sauer. None of the Company's employees are represented by labor unions or covered by any collective bargaining agreement. The Company considers its relations with its employees to be satisfactory.

REGULATION—UNITED STATES

Regulation of Gas and Oil Production

        Gas and oil operations are subject to various types of regulation by state and federal agencies. Legislation affecting the gas and oil industry is under constant review for amendment or expansion. Also, numerous departments and agencies, both federal and state, are authorized by statute to issue rules and regulations binding on the gas and oil industry and its individual members, some of which carry substantial penalties for failure to comply. The regulatory burden on the gas and oil industry increases the Company's cost of doing business and, consequently, affects its profitability.

        States in which the Company conducts its gas and oil activities regulate the production and sale of natural gas and crude oil, including requirements for obtaining drilling permits, the method of developing new fields, the spacing and operation of wells and the prevention of waste of gas and oil resources. In addition, most states regulate the rate of production and may establish maximum daily production allowables for wells on a market demand or conservation basis.

Gas Price Controls

        Prior to January 1993, certain natural gas sold by the Company was subject to regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") under the Natural Gas Act of 1938 and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 ("NGPA"). The NGPA prescribed maximum lawful prices for natural gas sales effective December 1, 1978. Effective January 1, 1993, natural gas prices were completely deregulated and sales of the Company's natural gas are now made at market prices. The majority of the Company's gas sales contracts either contain decontrolled price provisions or already provide for market prices.

Oil Price Controls

        Sales of crude oil, condensate and gas liquids by the Company are not regulated and are made at market prices.

Environmental Regulation

        The Company's activities are subject to federal and state laws and regulations governing environmental quality and pollution control. The existence of such regulations has a material effect on the Company's operations but the cost of such compliance has not been material to date. However, the Company believes that the gas and oil industry may experience increasing liabilities and risks under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as well as other federal, state and local environmental laws, as a result of increased enforcement of environmental laws by various regulatory agencies. As an "owner" or "operator" of property where hazardous materials may exist or be present, the Company, like all others in the petroleum industry, could be liable for fines and/or "clean-up" costs, regardless of whether the Company was responsible for the release of any hazardous substances.

        Rocno Corporation ("Rocno"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is a party to a trust agreement in connection with the environmental clean-up plan for the Sheridan Superfund Site in Waller County, Texas. See Item 3, Legal Proceedings.

Indian Lands

        The Company's Muddy Ridge and Pavillion Fields are located on the Wind River Indian Reservation. The Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribes levy taxes on the production of hydrocarbons. The Bureau of Indian Affairs Minerals Management Service and Bureau of Land Management of the United States Department of the Interior perform certain regulatory functions relating to operation of Indian gas and oil leases. The Company owns interests in three leases in the Pavillion Field which were issued pursuant to the provisions of the Act of August 21, 1916, for initial terms of 20 years each, with a preferential right by the lessee to renew the leases for subsequent ten-year terms. The leases were renewed for an additional ten-year term in 1992, effective as of June 23, 1993. One of these leases has been amended to provide for incremental extensions of this lease term of up to an additional 12 years by drilling and completing additional wells on each lease prior to June 2003. In December of 2000 the Company added to its Tribal base inventory around the Pavillion Field by signing eleven additional ten-year leases covering nearly 25,800 net acres. The Company is currently awaiting final approval of the leases by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and has deferred drilling initially planned for early 2003 until certain issues have been resolved.

REGULATION—CANADA

Regulation of Gas and Oil Production and Price Controls

        The oil and natural gas industry in Canada is subject to extensive controls and regulations imposed by various levels of government. It is not expected that any of these controls or regulations will affect our operations in a manner materially different than they would affect other oil and gas companies of similar size.

        In Canada, oil and gas exports are subject to regulation by the National Energy Board (NEB), an independent federal regulatory agency. The Company does not, at present, export oil or gas under the terms of these regulations, but may be affected if regulations imposed by the NEB act to restrict the sales of gas and oil by other companies. Exports are also subject to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which became effective on January 1, 1994. NAFTA carries forward most of the material energy terms contained in the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. In the context of energy resources, Canada continues to remain free to determine whether exports to the United States or Mexico will be allowed provided that any export restrictions do not: (i) reduce the proportion of energy resource exported relative to domestic use (based upon the proportion prevailing in the most recent 36-month period), (ii) impose an export price higher than the domestic price, and (iii) disrupt normal channels of supply. All three countries are prohibited from imposing minimum export or import price requirements. NAFTA contemplates clearer disciplines on regulators to ensure fair implementation of any regulatory changes and to minimize disruption of contractual arrangements, which is important for Canadian natural gas exports.

        The provincial government of Alberta also regulates the volume of natural gas which may be removed from the province for consumption elsewhere based on such factors as reserve availability, transportation arrangements and market considerations.

        In addition to federal regulation, each province has legislation and regulations which govern land tenure, royalties, production rates, environmental protection and other matters. The royalty regime on Crown lands is a significant factor in the profitability of oil and natural gas production. Royalties payable on production from lands other than Crown lands are determined by negotiations between the mineral owner and the lessee. Crown royalties are determined by government regulation and are generally calculated as a percentage of the value of the gross production, and the rate of royalties payable generally depends in part on prescribed reference prices, well productivity, geographical location, field discovery date and the type or quality of the petroleum product produced.

        From time to time the governments of Canada and Alberta have established incentive programs which have included royalty rate deductions, royalty holidays and tax credits for the purpose of encouraging oil and natural gas exploration or enhanced recovery projects. At present, few of these programs are currently in effect.

        In Alberta, certain producers of oil or natural gas are currently entitled to a credit against the royalties to the Crown by virtue of the ARTC (Alberta royalty tax credit) program. The credit is determined by applying a specified rate to a maximum of $2 million CDN of Alberta Crown royalties payable for each producer or associated group of producers. The specified rate is a function of the Royalty Tax Credit reference price (RTCRP) which is set quarterly by the Alberta Department of Energy and ranges from 25% to 75%, depending on oil and gas par prices for the previous calendar quarter. The provincial government of Alberta has proposed changes to the ARTC program which have not been finalized.

Environmental Regulation

        In Canada, the oil and natural gas industry is currently subject to environmental regulation pursuant to provincial and federal legislation. Environmental legislation provides for restrictions and prohibitions on releases or emissions of various substances produced or utilized in association with certain oil and gas industry operations. In addition, legislation requires that well and facility sites be abandoned and reclaimed to the satisfaction of provincial authorities.

        In Alberta, environmental compliance has been governed by the Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act ("AEPEA") since September 1, 1993. In addition, AEPEA also imposes certain environmental responsibilities on oil and natural gas operators in Alberta and in certain instances also imposes penalties for violations.

ITEM 2. Properties

GAS AND OIL PROPERTIES

        The principal properties of the Company consist of developed and undeveloped gas and oil leases. Generally, the terms of developed gas and oil leaseholds are continuing and such leases remain in force by virtue of, and so long as, production from lands under lease is maintained. Undeveloped gas and oil leaseholds are generally for a primary term, such as five or ten years, subject to maintenance with the payment of specified minimum delay rentals or extension by production. The Company also has options to lease undeveloped gas and oil leaseholds on Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho Tribal lands. The oil and gas leases had initial terms of twenty years and the Company has a preferential right to negotiate with the Tribes for renewals of subsequent ten-year terms.

TITLE TO PROPERTIES

        As is customary in the gas and oil industry, the Company makes only a cursory review of title to undeveloped gas and oil leases at the time they are acquired by the Company. However, before drilling commences, the Company causes a thorough title search to be conducted, and any material defects in title are remedied prior to the time actual drilling of a well on the lease begins. The Company believes that it has good title to its gas and oil properties, some of which are subject to immaterial encumbrances, easements and restrictions. The gas and oil properties owned by the Company are also typically subject to royalty and other similar non-cost bearing interests customary in the industry. The Company does not believe that any of these encumbrances or burdens materially affects the Company's ownership or use of its properties.

ACREAGE

        The following table sets forth the gross and net acres of developed and undeveloped gas and oil leases held by the Company at December 31, 2002. Included in the table are approximately 281,000 gross (253,000 net) acres in Wyoming under gas and oil option agreements acquired from certain Indian tribes.

        "Gross" acres refer to the number of acres in which the Company owns a working interest. "Net" acres refer to the sum of the fractional working interests owned by the Company in gross acres.

GAS AND OIL RESERVES

        Estimates of the Company's gas, oil and natural gas liquids reserves including future net revenues and the present value of future net cash flows, were prepared by the Company's petroleum engineering staff and reviewed by Ryder Scott (independent petroleum consultants). Guidelines established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") were utilized to prepare these reserve estimates. Estimates of gas, oil and natural gas liquids reserves and their estimated values require numerous engineering assumptions as to the productive capacity and production rates of existing geological formations and require the use of certain SEC guidelines as to assumptions regarding costs to be incurred in developing and producing reserves and prices to be realized from the sale of future production.

        Accordingly, estimates of reserves and their value are inherently imprecise and are subject to constant revision and change and should not be construed as representing the actual quantities of future production or cash flows to be realized from the Company's gas and oil properties or the fair market value of such properties.

        Certain additional unaudited information regarding the Company's reserves, including the present value of future net cash flows, is set forth in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

        The Company has no gas, oil and natural gas liquids reserves or production subject to long-term supply or similar agreements with foreign governments or authorities.

        Estimates of the Company's total proved gas and oil reserves have not been filed with or included in reports to any federal authority or agency other than the SEC.

PRODUCTIVE WELLS

        The following table sets forth the gross and net productive gas and oil wells in wells in which the Company owned an interest at December 31, 2002.

        A "gross" well is a well in which the Company owns a working interest. "Net" wells refer to the sum of the fractional working interests owned by the Company in gross wells.

GAS AND OIL DRILLING ACTIVITY

        The following table sets forth the Company's gross and net interests in exploratory and development wells drilled during the periods indicated.

        At December 31, 2002, 5 gross (2.6 net) development wells and 6 gross (4.7 net) exploration wells were in various stages of drilling and completion in Texas, Colorado, and Wyoming, while 3 gross (2.5 net) development wells were in various stages of drilling and completion in Canada. The investment in the exploratory wells in progress was approximately $10 million at December 31, 2002.

OTHER PROPERTIES

        The Company leases its corporate office facilities in Denver, Colorado. The lease covers approximately 56,500 square feet and expires January 31, 2004. Of this amount, the Company subleases 7,246 square feet under an agreement that expires January 31, 2004.

        The Company leases office facilities in Midland, Texas. The lease covers approximately 33,150 square feet for a term of five years and expires December 31, 2003.

        The Company also leases office facilities in Calgary, Alberta. The lease covers approximately 14,600 square feet for a term of five years and expires August 31, 2004.

        The Company owns a 3,200 square foot building located on a 2.94 acre tract in Midland, Texas. The facility is used primarily for storage of pipe and oilfield equipment.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

        The Company is a defendant in several routine legal proceedings incidental to its business.

        In addition to routine legal proceedings incidental to the Company's business, Rocno was a defendant in a complaint filed by the United States of America which, among other things, alleged that Rocno and approximately 117 other companies arranged for the disposal of "hazardous materials" (within the meaning of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act) in Waller County, Texas (the "Sheridan Superfund Site"). Effective August 31, 1989, Rocno and thirty-six other defendants executed the Sheridan Site Trust Agreement (the "Trust") for the purpose of creating a trust to perform agreed upon remedial action at the Sheridan Superfund Site. In connection with the establishment of the Trust, the parties to the Trust have agreed to the terms of a Consent Decree entered December 3, 1991 in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Civil Action No. H-91-3529, pursuant to which the defendants joining the Consent Decree will carry out the clean-up plan prescribed by the Consent Decree. The estimate of the total clean-up cost is approximately $30 million. Under terms of the Trust, each party is allocated a percentage of costs necessary to fund the Trust for clean-up costs. Rocno's proportionate share of the estimated clean-up costs is 0.33% or $99,000, of which $16,000 has been paid, and the remainder was accrued in the Company's consolidated financial statements. If the clean-up costs exceed the projected amount, Rocno will be required to pay its pro rata share of the excess clean-up costs.

        The Company is also a party to an action brought in Sweetwater County, Wyoming by three overriding royalty interest owners seeking certification as a class of all non-governmental entities which are paid royalties or overriding royalties by the Company in Wyoming. This action is one of more than a dozen virtually identical class action lawsuits filed in various Wyoming courts against producers and operators in Wyoming. The complaint alleges that the Company violated the Wyoming Royalty Payment Act (the "Act") by improperly deducting gas transportation costs in calculating royalties and overriding royalties on Wyoming production and by failing to properly itemize all deductions taken on its payee reports. The issue in the case is whether transportation of natural gas off the lease to market is deductible transportation or nondeductible gathering within the meaning of the Act. In January 2003, the Wyoming Supreme Court agreed to answer two certified questions in a separate lawsuit which are (1) what is meant by the term "gathering" as that term is employed in the Act in defining nondeductible "costs of production," and (2) when do the causes of action for recovery of the reporting penalty and for improper deductions under the Act accrue. Because of the preliminary nature of the proceedings, it is not possible to fully determine the ultimate loss exposure or probable outcome of this litigation.

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's stockholders in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2002.

PART II

ITEM 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

        The Company's Common Stock is listed and principally traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the ticker symbol "TBI". Prior to May 16, 2002, the Company traded on the NASDAQ National Market System. The following table sets forth the range of high and low closing quotations for each quarterly period during the past two fiscal years as reported by NASDAQ National Market System for the March 31, 2001 through the March 31, 2002 periods, and the NYSE for the June 30, 2002 through December 31, 2002 period.

        On March 11, 2003 the last sale price of the Company's Common Stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange was $24.75 per share.

        The transfer agent for the Company's Common Stock is EquiServe Trust Company, N.A., Canton, Massachusetts.

        On December 31, 2002, the outstanding shares of the Company's Common Stock (39,261,191 shares) were held by approximately 1,763 holders of record.

        The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends to the holders of Common Stock and has no present intention to pay cash dividends to the holders of Common Stock in the future. Under the terms of the Company's Credit Agreement, the Company is prohibited from paying cash dividends to the holders of Common Stock without the written consent of the bank lenders.

        In January 1996, in connection with the acquisition of KN Production Company, ("KNPC") the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its $1.75 Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A (the "Preferred Stock") to the seller. The Preferred Stock was exchangeable, in whole or in part, at the option of the Company on any dividend payment date at any time on or after March 15, 1999, and prior to March 15, 2001, for shares of Common Stock at the exchange rate of 1.666 shares of Common Stock for each share of Preferred Stock; provided that (i) on or prior to the date of exchange, the Company shall have declared and paid or set apart for payment to the holders of Preferred Stock all accumulated and unpaid dividends to the date of exchange, and (ii) the current market price of the Common Stock was above $18.375 (the "Threshold Price"). On June 15, 2000, the Company elected to exchange 1,666,000 shares of its Common Stock for all 1,000,000 outstanding shares of the Preferred Stock as the Common Stock had traded above the Threshold Price.

        In July 1999, the Company completed an acquisition of substantially all of the Rocky Mountain oil and gas assets of Unocal Corporation for 5.8 million shares of common stock and $5 million in cash.

        On March 1, 1991, the Board of Directors adopted a Rights Plan designed to help assure that all stockholders receive fair and equal treatment in the event of a hostile attempt to take over the Company, and to help guard against abusive takeover tactics. The Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a "Right") for each outstanding share of Common Stock. The dividend was distributed on March 15, 1991 to the stockholders of record on that date. As of March 1, 2001, the Board of Directors amended and restated the Rights Plan. Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase, for the $120 per share exercise price, shares of Common Stock or other securities of the Company (or, under certain circumstances, of the acquiring person) worth twice the per share exercise price of the Right.

        The Rights will be exercisable only if a person or group acquires 15% or more of the Company's Common Stock or announces a tender offer which would result in ownership by a person or group of 15% or more of the Common Stock. The date on which the above occurs is to be known as the "Distribution Date". The Rights will expire on March 1, 2011, unless extended or redeemed earlier by the Company.

        At the time the Rights dividend was declared, the Board of Directors further authorized the issuance of one Right with respect to each share of the Company's Common Stock that shall become outstanding between March 15, 1991 and the earlier of the Distribution Date or the expiration or redemption of the Rights. Until the Distribution Date occurs, the certificates representing shares of the Company's Common Stock also evidence the Rights. Following the Distribution Date, the Rights will be evidenced by separate certificates.

        The provisions described above may tend to deter any potential unsolicited tender offers or other efforts to obtain control of the Company that are not approved by the Board of Directors and thereby deprive the stockholders of opportunities to sell shares of the Company's Common Stock at prices higher than the prevailing market price. On the other hand, these provisions will tend to assure continuity of management and corporate policies and to induce any person seeking control of the Company or a business combination with the Company to negotiate on terms acceptable to the then elected Board of Directors.

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data

        The following tables set forth selected financial information for the Company for each of the years shown.

        The Company's historical results of operations have been materially affected by the increase in the Company's size as a result of the Stellarton Acquisition in January 2001 and the Unocal Acquisition in July 1999. (See the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company included elsewhere herein.)

(1)

Income (loss) in 2000, 1999 and 1998 shown net of the preferred dividends paid in these periods of $875,000, $1,750,000 and $1,750,000, respectively.

(2)

EBITDAX reflects income before taxes, plus interest expense, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, exploration costs and impairments of leasehold costs. EBITDAX and cash flows from operating activities before changes in working capital are not measures determined pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") and are not intended to be used in lieu of GAAP presentations of net income or cash flows from operating activities. EBITDAX for 1998 excludes $51.3 million for impairment of gas and oil properties, which were non-cash charges. EBITDAX for 2002 and 2001 excludes the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles.

        The following tables set forth selected information for the Company's gas and oil sales volumes and the proved reserves for each of the years shown.

ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK

        Certain statements in this report, including statements of the future plans, objectives, and expected performance of the Company, are forward-looking statements that are dependent on certain events, risks and uncertainties that may be outside the Company's control which could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Some of these include, but are not limited to, economic and competitive conditions, inflation rates, legislative and regulatory changes, financial market conditions, political and economic uncertainties, future business decisions, and other uncertainties, all of which are difficult to predict.

        There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proven oil and gas reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures. The total amount or timing of actual future production may vary significantly from reserves and production estimates. The drilling of exploratory wells can involve significant risks including those related to timing, success rates and cost overruns. Lease and rig availability, complex geology and other factors can affect these risks. Future oil and gas prices also could affect results of operations and cash flows.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

        The discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition and results of operations was based upon the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. We have identified certain of these policies as being of particular importance to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and which require the application of significant judgment by management. We analyze our estimates, including those related to the accounting for oil and gas revenues, bad debts, oil and gas properties, marketable securities, income taxes, derivatives, contingencies and litigation, and base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies relate to the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Company's financial statements:

Successful Efforts Method of Accounting

        The Company accounts for its natural gas and crude oil exploration and development activities utilizing the successful efforts method of accounting. Under this method, costs of productive exploratory wells, development dry holes and productive wells and undeveloped leases are capitalized. Gas and oil lease acquisition costs are also capitalized. Exploration costs, including personnel costs, certain geological and geophysical expenses and delay rentals for gas and oil leases, are charged to expense as incurred. Exploratory drilling costs are initially capitalized, but charged to expense if and when the well is determined not to have found reserves in commercial quantities. The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate. A gain or loss is recognized for all other sales of producing properties.

        The application of the successful efforts method of accounting requires managerial judgment to determine the proper classification of wells designated as developmental or exploratory which will ultimately determine the proper accounting treatment of the costs incurred. The results from a drilling operation can take considerable time to analyze and the determination that commercial reserves have been discovered requires both judgment and industry experience. Wells may be completed that are assumed to be productive and actually deliver gas and oil in quantities insufficient to be economic, which may result in the abandonment of the wells at a later date. Wells are drilled that have targeted geologic structures that are both developmental and exploratory in nature and an allocation of costs is required to properly account for the results. The evaluation of gas and oil leasehold acquisition costs requires judgment to estimate the fair value of these costs with reference to drilling activity in a given area. Drilling activities in an area by other companies may also effectively condemn leasehold positions.

        The successful efforts method of accounting can have a significant impact on the operational results reported when the Company is entering a new exploratory area in hopes of finding a gas and oil field that will be the focus of future development drilling activity. Any initial exploratory wells that are unsuccessful are expensed. Seismic costs can be substantial which will result in additional exploration expenses when incurred.

Reserve Estimates

        The Company's estimates of gas, oil and natural gas liquids reserves, by necessity, are projections based on geologic and engineering data, and there are uncertainties inherent in the interpretation of such data as well as the projection of future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of gas and oil and the recovery factor for each accumulation, both of which are difficult to measure. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data, engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Estimates of economically recoverable gas, oil and natural gas liquids reserves and future net cash flows necessarily depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, such as historical production from the area, the assumed effects of regulations by governmental agencies and assumptions governing future gas, oil and natural gas liquids prices, future operating costs, severance taxes, development costs and workover costs, all of which may in fact vary considerably from actual results. The future drilling costs associated with reserves assigned to proved undeveloped locations may ultimately increase to an extent that these reserves may be later determined to be uneconomic. For these reasons, estimates of the economically recoverable quantities of gas, oil and natural gas liquids attributable to any particular group of properties, classifications of such reserves based on risk of recovery, and estimates of the future net cash flows expected therefrom may vary substantially. Any significant variance in the assumptions could materially affect the estimated quantity and value of the reserves, which could affect the carrying value of the Company's gas and oil properties and/or the rate of depletion of the gas and oil properties. Actual production, revenues and expenditures with respect to the Company's reserves will likely vary from estimates, and such variances may be material.

Impairment of Gas and Oil Properties

        The Company reviews its gas and oil properties for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate a decline in the recoverability of their carrying value. The Company estimates the expected undiscounted future cash flows of its gas and oil properties and compares such future cash flows to the carrying amount of the gas and oil properties to determine if the carrying amount is recoverable. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, the Company will adjust the carrying amount of the gas and oil properties to their fair value. The factors used to determine fair value include estimates of proved reserves, future commodity pricing, future production estimates, anticipated capital expenditures, and a discount rate commensurate with the risk associated with realizing the expected cash flows projected. There were no impairments of producing gas and oil properties in 2002, 2001 or 2000.

        Given the complexities associated with gas and oil reserve estimates and the history of price volatility in the gas and oil markets, events may arise that would require the Company to record an impairment of the recorded book values associated with gas and oil properties. In 1998, the Company recognized an impairment of $51.3 million primarily as a result of the low market prices in effect at that time and there can be no assurance that impairments will not be required in the future.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

        The Company periodically hedges a portion of its gas and oil production through swap and collar agreements. The purpose of the hedges is to provide a measure of stability to our cash flows in an environment of volatile gas and oil prices and to manage the exposure to commodity price risk. We recognize all derivative instruments as assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value. For cash flow hedges, changes in fair value, to the extent the hedge is effective, are recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. For derivative instruments that do not qualify as hedges, changes in fair value are recognized in earnings currently.

        The estimation of fair values for our hedging derivatives requires substantial judgment. The fair values of our derivatives are estimated on a monthly basis using an option-pricing model. The option-pricing model uses various factors that include closing exchange prices on the NYMEX, over-the-counter quotations, volatility and the time value of options. These pricing and discounting variables are sensitive to market volatility as well as changes in future price forecasts, regional price differentials and interest rates.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The following analysis of operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and associated footnotes included in this 10-K.

        Excluding the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, the Company realized net income for the year ended December 31, 2002 of $9.9 million or $.25 per share (diluted basis) as compared to net income of $67.5 million or $1.68 per share (diluted basis) for the same period in 2001. The majority of this decrease was attributable to lower commodity prices in 2002. The Company realized net income of $65.7 million or $1.76 per share (diluted basis) in the year ended December 31, 2000. The majority of the Company's production is natural gas and these general earnings trends were impacted significantly by the natural gas prices in effect each of these periods. The average realized natural gas price for 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $2.19 per Mcf, $3.71 per Mcf and $3.46 per Mcf, respectively.

        The net loss and net income recognized in the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 were both impacted by the adoption of new accounting principles during these periods. On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the new accounting standard, SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (SFAS No. 142). In conjunction with the January 2001 Stellarton Energy acquisition, the Company allocated $20 million of the purchase price to goodwill. The fair value test performed to evaluate the carrying value of this business segment and the recorded goodwill as required by SFAS No. 142 resulted in the recognition of a non-cash charge of $18.1 million. The year ended December 31, 2001 was similarly impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities effective January 1, 2001 for which a $2.0 million gain (net of tax) was recognized.

Revenues

        During 2002, revenues from gas, oil and natural gas liquids production decreased 29% to $194.3 million, as compared to $274.0 million in 2001. This decrease was the result of (i) a decrease in average gas prices realized by the Company from $3.71 per Mcf in 2001 to $2.19 per Mcf in 2002, which decreased revenues $109.7 million, (ii) a decrease in average oil and natural gas liquids prices received from $17.86 to $16.35 which decreased revenues $3.4 million partially offset by, (iii) an increase in gas sales volumes of 13% to 72 Bcf which increased revenues by $31.0 million, and (iv) an increase in oil and natural gas liquids sales volumes of 6% to 2.2 million barrels, which increased revenues by $2.4 million.

        Revenues in 2002 were not materially impacted by hedging activities.

        During 2001, revenues from gas, oil and natural gas liquids production increased 26% to $274.0 million, as compared to $217.0 million in 2000. This increase was the result of (i) an increase in average gas prices received by the Company from $3.46 per Mcf in 2000 to $3.71 per Mcf in 2001, which increased revenues $16.0 million, (ii) a decrease in average oil and natural gas liquids prices received from $21.49 to $17.86 which decreased revenues $7.6 million, (iii) an increase in gas sales volumes of 25% to 63.8 Bcf which increased revenues by $43.7 million, and (iv) an increase in oil and natural gas liquids sales volumes of 14% to 2.1 million barrels, which increased revenues by $4.9 million.

        Revenues in 2001 were also impacted by cash gains realized from hedging activities. The NYMEX collar and swap transactions considered effective hedges and settled in 2001, resulted in realized gains of $15.9 million, which were included in gas and oil sales. There was no material hedging activity in 2000.

        The revenues contributed by the Stellarton transaction for the period subsequent to the closing date of January 12, 2001 were $30.1 million in 2001 and $27.8 million in 2002.

        The following table reflects the Company's revenues, average prices received for gas and oil, and amount of gas and oil production in each of the years shown:

        Gathering and processing revenues decreased 12% to $20.5 million in 2002 compared to $23.2 million in 2001. A number of non-strategic gathering and processing assets were sold throughout 2001 resulting in the decrease in gathering and processing revenue in 2002. In 2001, gathering and processing revenue increased 27% to $23.2 million, as compared to $18.3 million in 2000. This increase was attributable to the distribution of certain gathering and processing assets to the Company from Wildhorse Energy Partners, LLC ("Wildhorse") in November 2000. Incremental revenues were recognized in 2001 as a result of the 100% ownership of these gathering and processing assets which previously were 45% owned by the Company through the Wildhorse partnership.

        Net marketing and trading income increased to $5.3 million in 2002 from a net margin of $1.9 million in 2001 and $5.8 million in 2000. Income increased in 2002 due to the Company transporting gas into the Mid Continent region to take advantage of higher gas prices in this market. Net marketing and trading income has increased principally as a result of this marketing opportunity that utilized the Company's firm transportation. Although this marketing differential increased marketing and trading income, the Company had previously entered into certain financial instruments to lock the basis differential for the June through October contract periods in the Mid Continent market. As these financial instruments were considered trading derivatives under SFAS No. 133, the cash settlements of $2.1 million in 2002 were recognized as derivative losses during the year ended December 31, 2002. The cash profits realized on the physical sales included in marketing and trading income were partially offset by the $2.1 million cash settlement on the trading derivatives. However, the net impact of these transactions for 2002 was that the Company was successful in realizing an additional $.29 Mmbtu margin (after transportation costs) on gas moved into the Mid Continent region. The marketing and trading margins in 2000 benefited from certain term and spot marketing arrangements at more favorable terms than were available in the 2001 market.

        Drilling revenue associated with the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Sauer, remained relatively unchanged in 2002 at $14.3 million. In 2002 Sauer generated a higher percentage of its contract drilling revenue from third-party contracts not affiliated with Tom Brown. Contract drilling revenues associated with wells operated by the Company and drilled by Sauer are eliminated in consolidation. This change in mix for 2002 resulted in essentially equivalent drilling revenues for 2002 and 2001 despite a decrease in the rig utilization rates from over 90% in 2001 to approximately 70% in 2002. Drilling revenue increased from $11.5 million in 2000 to $14.8 million in 2001 due to higher rig utilization rates and increased day rates resulting from the general increase in activity within the oil and gas industry in 2001 as compared to 2000.

Costs and Expenses

        Expenses related to gas and oil production remained flat from 2001 to 2002. On an Mcfe basis, gas and oil production costs decreased to $.38 in 2002 from $.42 in 2001 as a result of a continued focus on cost containment.

        Expenses related to gas and oil production increased 26% from 2000 to 2001 due primarily to the Stellarton acquisition and increased production levels in 2001. On an Mcfe basis, gas and oil production costs remained relatively flat at $.42 in 2001 and $.41 in 2000.

        Taxes on gas and oil production decreased by 21% or ($4.4 million) in 2002 primarily due to a 29% or ($80 million) decrease in revenue from gas, oil and natural gas liquids from 2001 due to lower natural gas and natural gas liquids commodity prices.

        Taxes on gas and oil production decreased by 5% or ($1.1 million) in 2001 despite a 26% or ($57 million) increase in revenue from gas, oil and natural gas liquids for 2001. This resulted from the inclusion of $30.1 million of Canadian revenues in the 2001 results which are not subject to severance and other taxes typically incurred in the United States. Additionally, $15.9 million realized on the natural gas hedge transactions was included in gas and oil sales in 2001 which is not subject to production related taxes. The Company also obtained a refund in 2001 of a portion of the production taxes paid in prior years which reduced the expenses reported.

        Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased $16.9 million in 2002 as compared to 2001. The production increase of 12% on a Mcfe basis for 2002 contributed $8.8 million to the increased depreciation, depletion and amortization. The Company's per unit depletion rate also increased in 2002 as a result of higher finding costs on the gas and oil reserve additions associated with the 2002 and 2001 capital programs. In 2002, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense on the producing gas and oil properties was $.95 per Mcfe as compared to $.83 per Mcfe in 2001.

        Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased $24.0 million in 2001 as compared to 2000. Approximately $14.1 million of this increase was associated with the depletion recorded on the Stellarton assets acquired in January 2001. The production increase of 9% on a Mcfe basis on the domestic properties for 2001 also increased depreciation, depletion and amortization.

        Gathering and processing costs principally represent costs associated with operating and maintaining the field systems. The $3.9 million decrease in gathering and processing costs for 2002 was caused by the Company's disposition of a number of the gathering and processing assets in 2001 which were considered non-strategic to the Company's operations.

        Expenses associated with the Company's exploration activities were $22.8 million, $34.2 million and $11.0 million for the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Exploration expense for these periods was impacted by the dry hole costs of $7.8 million, $15.8 million and $1.2 million recognized in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company also incurred additional seismic costs in 2001 which were primarily associated with the James Lime and Deep Valley projects in Texas that contributed to the increased exploration expense incurred in that period. Capital expenditures of $161.7 million were incurred in 2002 compared to $358.1 million in 2001, which included $95 million associated with the Stellarton Acquisition. The 2002 exploration, development and land related expenditures were $139 million, a decrease of 43% in comparison to 2001. In 2000, the exploration, development and land related expenditures were $109.6 million. The Company's capital program budgets are influenced by the gas and oil prices received for its production. The exploration expenses recognized by the Company are influenced by the magnitude of the capital expenditures incurred in each year. Capital programs are risk adjusted to balance exploration and development opportunities.

        Recurring general and administrative expenses have increased from year to year as a result of the Company's increased level of operations. On an Mcfe basis, general and administrative expenses were $.22, $.30, and $.19 for the years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Included in the expenses for 2001 was a $5.3 million ($.07 per Mcfe) pre-tax charge recorded in the first quarter of 2001 associated with the retirement of Donald L. Evans, previously Tom Brown, Inc.'s Chairman and CEO. Mr. Evans received a $1.5 million retirement payment and the Company recognized a $3.8 million non-cash charge in conjunction with the acceleration of Mr. Evans' stock options. General and administrative expenses related to the new Canadian operations contributed $2.0 million ($.02 per Mcfe) to the increase in 2002 and $2.5 million ($.03 per Mcfe) for 2001. Expenses also increased due to the addition of personnel necessary to implement the increased capital expenditure programs in 2001 and 2002.

        Bad debt expense increased in 2002 as a result of a default by a previous purchaser of the Company's natural gas liquids in the Paradox Basin of Colorado and Utah on payments owed the Company totaling $6.2 million. An allowance for this entire receivable was recorded in the third quarter of 2002 given the uncertainty of collection at that time. The Company continued to aggressively pursue recovery of the amount owed and in the fourth quarter of 2002, a $1.4 million settlement was received in cash. The collection of this settlement was treated as an adjustment to the allowance originally recorded. As of December 31, 2002, the Company does not anticipate that any future settlements will be received that will materially reduce the loss recognized as a result of this purchaser's default.

        Interest and other expense in 2002 was impacted by standby fees incurred under the terms of a two-year commitment for a drilling rig utilized by the Company at the Deep Valley project in West Texas. This rig became available in 2002 and $1.6 million of standby fees were charged to expense when the rig was not being utilized. Interest expense also increased in 2001 and 2002 after the Stellarton acquisition in January 2001 for which $95 million in debt was incurred. The Company's effective interest rate under its credit facility was 3.9% at December 31, 2002 and 4.1% at December 31, 2001.

        The Company recorded income tax provisions of $3.2 million, $38.1 million and $39.8 million in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively, resulting in effective tax rates of 24.4%, 36.1% and 37.4%, respectively. The 2002 income tax provision of $3.2 million was impacted by a $1.6 million tax reduction associated with certain Canadian expenses deductible in the United States and by $0.7 million in state tax credits associated with drilling incentives in Colorado and Utah. There was no tax impact associated with the goodwill impairment recorded in conjunction with the change in accounting principle as goodwill is not considered a deductible expense for tax purposes. At December 31, 2002, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward available for U.S. Federal tax purposes of $25.9 million and a net operating loss carryforward available to reduce future Canadian federal income taxes of $6.0 million ($9.4 million CDN). Additionally, statutory depletion carryforwards of approximately $7.2 million and $4.8 million of alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards are available in the U.S. to offset future taxes. Based upon the operating results for 2002 and the present economic environment for the gas and oil industry, the Company believes that it will generate sufficient taxable income to utilize these carryforwards.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Growth and Acquisitions

        The Company continues to pursue opportunities which will add value by economically increasing its reserve base and presence in significant natural gas areas, and further developing the Company's ability to control and market the production of natural gas. As the Company continues to evaluate potential acquisitions and property development opportunities, it will benefit from its financing flexibility and the leverage potential of the Company's overall capital structure.

Capital and Exploration Expenditures

        The Company's capital and exploration expenditures and sources of financing for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 are as follows:

        The Company anticipates capital and exploration expenditures between $155 to $185 million in 2003, approximately 90% of which will be allocated to exploration and development activity. The timing of most of the Company's capital expenditures is discretionary and there are no material long-term commitments associated with the Company's capital expenditure plans. Consequently, the Company is able to adjust the level of its capital expenditures as circumstances warrant. The level of capital expenditures by the Company will vary in future periods depending on energy market conditions and other related economic factors.

        Historically, the Company has funded capital expenditures and working capital requirements with both internally generated cash, borrowings and stock transactions.

Property Sales

        In April 2002, the Company sold its interest in oil and gas properties located in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming for net cash proceeds of $7.2 million. These properties had a net book value of $3.1 million which resulted in a $4.1 million gain on the sale.

        In April 2002, the Company also sold certain oil and gas properties located primarily in Louisiana for $2.0 million. In November 2002, the Company sold certain oil and gas properties located in Colorado for $1.6 million. As these sales represented partial interests in these proved properties, the proceeds were recorded as a reduction to the recorded cost of the oil and gas properties.

        In 2001, $52.4 million in cash proceeds were derived from property sales. In May 2001, the Company sold its interest in gas and oil properties located in Oklahoma. These properties had a net book basis of $14.4 million. This transaction resulted in a gain of $10.l million with net cash proceeds of $24.5 million. Cash proceeds of $24 million were also realized in conjunction with several sales transactions in 2001 associated with the disposition of gathering and processing facilities received in the Wildhorse distribution in November 2000. As the systems sold were non-strategic to the Company's operations and these divestitures were anticipated as part of the Wildhorse integration process, the proceeds derived on these transactions were recorded as a reduction to the investment in the gathering assets.

Debt

Contractual Obligations

        In addition to the bank credit facility discussed in the following note, the Company had various other contractual obligations as of December 31, 2002. The Company has no off-balance sheet debt or other such unrecorded obligations and the Company has not guaranteed the debt of any other party. The following table lists the Company's significant liabilities at December 31, 2002 including the credit facility:

        The Company leases its corporate office in Denver, Colorado under the terms of an operating lease, which expires in January 2004. Yearly payments under the lease are approximately $1,061,000 net of sublease income. The Company's offices in Midland, Texas represents a commitment of $215,000 per year through December 2003 and the office lease in Calgary, Alberta expires in August 2004 at a rate of $152,000 per year. The remaining operating lease commitments represent equipment leases, which expire during 2002 through 2008.

        The Company has entered into various firm transportation commitments for approximately 56.8 Mmcf of gross gas sales per day as of December 31, 2002. The majority of these contracts expire in 2003 through 2006. Subsequent to December 31, 2002, the Company entered into additional firm transportation commitments on approximately 29 Mmcf of gross gas sales per day under varying terms that expire in 2008 and 2011. These 2003 commitments totaled $19.6 million and are not included in the above schedule.

        On December 31, 2001, the Company had entered into an agreement with a third party to process its gas production from the White River Dome coal bed methane project in the Piceance Basin. Under the terms of this agreement, the Company is obligated to pay the third party $220,000 per month over the ten year term to cover the fixed operating costs of the plant and provide for a recovery of the plant investment to the third party. The Company is also obligated to reimburse the third party for certain variable expenses associated with the volumes processed through the plant and for compression made available to the Company. Under certain circumstances, the Company has the right but not the obligation to purchase the processing facility from the third party during the term of this agreement.

        To assure the availability of a drilling rig in conjunction with an exploration program in west Texas, the Company entered into a two-year commitment with a drilling contractor in 2001. The rig became available in 2002 and the two-year drilling obligation commenced on May 29, 2002. Under the terms of this arrangement, the Company is required to pay a day rate of $20,100 per day during drilling operations and $16,700 per day for rig moves.

Bank Credit Facility

        On June 30, 2000, the Company entered into a $125 million credit facility (the "Credit Facility") that was to mature in June 2003. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the borrowing base was established at $225 million.

        On March 20, 2001, as part of the final financing of the Stellarton acquisition, the Company repaid and cancelled its previous $125 million Credit Facility and entered into a new $225 million credit facility (the "Global Credit Facility"). The Global Credit Facility is comprised of: a $75 million line of credit in the U.S. and a $55 million line of credit in Canada which both mature in March 2004, and a $95 million five-year term loan in Canada. The borrowing base under the Global Credit Facility was set at $300 million. The Global Credit Facility allows the lenders one scheduled redetermination of the borrowing base each December. In addition, the lenders may elect to require one unscheduled redetermination in the event the borrowing base utilization exceeds 50% of the borrowing base at any time for a period of 15 consecutive business days. At December 31, 2002, the Company had borrowings outstanding under the Global Credit Facility totaling $133.2 million or 44% of the borrowing base at an average interest rate of 3.9% The amount available for borrowing under the Global Credit Facility at December 31, 2002 was $91.8 million.

        Borrowings under the Global Credit Facility are unsecured and bear interest, at the election of the Company, at a rate equal to (i) the greater of the global administrative agents prime rate or the federal funds effective rate plus an applicable margin, (ii) adjusted LIBOR for Eurodollar loans plus applicable margin, or (iii) Bankers' Acceptances plus applicable margin for Canadian dollar loans. Interest on amounts outstanding under the Global Credit Facility is due on the last day of each quarter for prime based loans, and in the case of Eurodollar loans with an interest period of more than three months, interest is due at the end of each three month interval.

        The Global Credit Facility contains certain financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth of not less than $350 million (adjusted upward by 50% of quarterly net income subsequent to March 31, 2001 and 50% of the net cash proceeds of any stock offering). The Company must also maintain a ratio of indebtedness to earnings before interest expense, state and federal taxes and depreciation, depletion and amortization expense and exploration expense of not more than 3.0 to 1.0 as calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter. The Company was in compliance with all covenants during 2002 and at December 31, 2002.

MARKETS AND PRICES

        The Company's revenues and associated cash flows are significantly impacted by changes in gas and oil prices. All of the Company's gas and oil production is currently market sensitive as none of the Company's gas and oil production has been presold at contractually specified prices. During 2002, the average prices received for gas and oil by the Company were $2.19 per Mcf and $16.35 per barrel, respectively, as compared to $3.71 Mcf and $17.86 per barrel in 2001 and $3.46 per Mcf and $21.49 per barrel in 2000.

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

COMMODITY PRICE FLUCTUTATIONS

        The Company's results of operations are highly dependent upon the prices received for oil and natural gas production. Accordingly, in order to increase the financial flexibility and to protect the Company against commodity price fluctuations, the Company may, from time to time in the ordinary course of business, enter into hedging arrangements, including commodity swap agreements, forward sale contracts, commodity futures, options and other similar agreements relating to natural gas and crude oil expected to be produced. The Company has also entered into certain financial instruments that did not qualify as hedging arrangements. These transactions have principally involved basis contracts entered into to secure a pricing differential into markets where the Company has transportation agreements.

        Financial instruments designated as hedges are accounted for on the accrual basis with gains and losses being recognized based on the type of contract and exposure being hedged. Gains and losses on natural gas and crude oil swaps designated as hedges of anticipated transactions, including gains or losses recognized upon early termination of contracts, are deferred and recognized in income when the associated hedged commodities are produced. In order for natural gas and crude oil swaps or collars to qualify as a hedge of an anticipated transaction, the derivative contract must identify the expected date of the transaction, the commodity involved, and the expected quantity to be purchased or sold among other requirements. In the event that it becomes probable that a hedged transaction will not occur, gains and losses, including gains or losses upon early termination of contracts, are included in the income statement.

        The Company has natural gas hedges, in the form of costless collars and swaps (including related basis swaps), as follows as of December 31, 2002:

        The Company also entered into certain financial instruments to lock the basis differential on 15,000 Mmbtu/day of firm transportation volumes during the June through October contract periods of 2002. These contracts effectively fixed a price differential into the Mid Continent market at a weighted average price of $0.78 above the price index for a delivery point in the Rocky Mountain area where the Company markets a significant portion of its natural gas production. Under SFAS 133, these basis swaps did not qualify for hedge accounting. Accordingly, these basis swaps resulted in the recognition of derivative losses of $2.1 million in 2002 which were recorded directly to earnings.

INTEREST RATE RISK

        At December 31, 2002, the Company had $133.2 million outstanding under the Global Credit Facility at an average interest rate of 3.9%. Borrowings under the Global Credit Facility bear interest, at the election of the Company, at (i) the greater of the agent bank's prime rate or the federal funds effective rate, plus an applicable margin or (ii) the agent bank's Eurodollar rate, plus an applicable margin. As a result, the Company's annual interest cost in 2003 will fluctuate based on short-term interest rates. Assuming no change in the amount outstanding during 2003, the impact on interest expense of a ten percent change in the average interest rate would be approximately $.5 million. As the interest rate is variable and is reflective of current market conditions, the carrying value of the Global Credit Facility approximates the fair value.

FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RISK

        The Company conducts business in Canada where the Canadian dollar has been designated as the functional currency. This subjects the Company to foreign currency exchange risk on cash flows related to sales, expenses, financing and investing transactions. The Company has not entered into any foreign currency forward contracts or other similar financial instruments to manage this risk.

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Independent Auditors' Report

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Tom Brown, Inc.:

        We have audited the 2002 consolidated financial statements of Tom Brown, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit. The 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements of Tom Brown, Inc. and subsidiaries as listed in the accompanying index were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors' report, dated February 27, 2002, on those consolidated financial statement was unqualified and included an explanatory paragraph that described the change in the Company's method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities discussed in Notes 2 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the 2002 consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tom Brown, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        As discussed in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets in 2002, and as discussed in Notes 2 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities in 2001.

Denver, Colorado
February 20, 2003

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

THE FOLLOWING REPORT IS A COPY OF THE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED REPORT FROM ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP (ANDERSEN). ANDERSEN DID NOT PERFORM ANY PROCEDURES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K NOR HAS ANDERSEN PROVIDED A CONSENT TO THE INCLUSION OF ITS REPORT IN THIS FORM 10-K. FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION, SEE EXHIBIT 23.2 TO THE FORM 10-K OF WHICH THIS REPORT FORMS A PART. ACCORDINGLY, THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REISSUED BY ANDERSEN.

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Tom Brown, Inc.:

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tom Brown, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tom Brown, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

        As explained in Notes 2 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, on January 1, 2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.

Denver, Colorado

February 27, 2002

TOM BROWN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS