UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | |
ý |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2003 |
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO |
Commission File Number 000-23401
GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
33-0612983 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
900 SANDHILL ROAD, RENO, NEVADA (Address of principal executive offices) |
89521 (Zip code) |
|
(775) 850-6000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No ý
On March 7, 2003, the registrant had 11,727,439 outstanding shares of its Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share.
GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10 -Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2003
INDEX
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Part I. | Financial Information: | |||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets October 31, 2002 and January 31, 2003 |
3 |
|||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Three Months Ended January 31, 2002 and 2003 |
4 |
|||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three Months Ended January 31, 2002 and 2003 |
5 |
|||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
6 |
|||
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
10 |
||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
14 |
||
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
15 |
||
Part II. |
Other Information: |
|||
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
16 |
||
Item 2. |
Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
16 |
||
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
16 |
||
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
16 |
||
Item 5. |
Other Information |
17 |
||
Item 6. |
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
17 |
||
Signatures |
18 |
|||
Certifications |
19 |
2
GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
October 31, 2002 |
January 31, 2003 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
||||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,233 | $ | 2,145 | ||||
Short-term investments | 5,045 | 4,114 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 3,906 | 4,446 | ||||||
Deposits | 610 | 60 | ||||||
Refundable income taxes | 3,888 | 3,566 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 433 | 603 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 2,278 | 2,278 | ||||||
Total current assets | 20,393 | 17,212 | ||||||
Bingo units, furniture and equipment, net |
21,620 |
22,278 |
||||||
Intangible and other non-current assets, net | 1,128 | 2,755 | ||||||
Goodwill | 14,960 | 16,774 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 58,101 | $ | 59,019 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders' equity: |
||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 914 | $ | 471 | ||||
Accrued payroll and related obligations | 805 | 626 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | 2,099 | 2,116 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | 13 | 322 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 3,831 | 3,535 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
|
189 |
||||||
Non-current employment obligations | 432 | 434 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 3,348 | 3,348 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders' equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value: 40,000,000 shares authorized; 13,090,764 shares issued at October 31, 2002 and 13,582,764 shares issued at January 31, 2003 | 13 | 14 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value | 45,716 | 46,216 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 12,857 | 13,379 | ||||||
Less: Treasury stock, at cost: 1,855,325 shares at October 31, 2002 and at January 31, 2003 | (8,096 | ) | (8,096 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity | 50,490 | 51,513 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 58,101 | $ | 59,019 | ||||
See accompanying notes.
3
GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
Three Months Ended January 31, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2003 |
||||||
|
(Unaudited) |
|||||||
Revenue | $ | 11,851 | $ | 13,198 | ||||
Cost of revenue | 4,963 | 5,264 | ||||||
Gross profit | 6,888 | 7,934 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
General and administrative | 1,997 | 2,902 | ||||||
Sales and marketing | 3,003 | 3,193 | ||||||
Research and development | 419 | 996 | ||||||
Total operating expenses | 5,419 | 7,091 | ||||||
Income from operations | 1,469 | 843 | ||||||
Interest and other income, net |
9 |
7 |
||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 1,478 | 850 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes |
565 |
328 |
||||||
Net income | $ | 913 | $ | 522 | ||||
Basic net income per share | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.05 | ||||
Diluted net income per share | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.04 | ||||
Shares used in the calculation of net income per share: | ||||||||
Basic | 10,986,454 | 11,588,396 | ||||||
Diluted | 11,902,055 | 11,665,288 | ||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
Three Months Ended January 31, |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2003 |
|||||||
|
(unaudited) |
||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 913 | $ | 522 | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and obsolescence | 1,804 | 2,598 | |||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 163 | (540 | ) | ||||||
Deposits, net | 363 | 550 | |||||||
Refundable income taxes | 575 | 322 | |||||||
Other current assets | (664 | ) | (170 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable | 707 | (443 | ) | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities | (445 | ) | (166 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 3,416 | 2,673 | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||||
Decrease (increase) in short-term investments | (320 | ) | 931 | ||||||
Capital expenditures for bingo units, furniture and equipment | (1,948 | ) | (2,317 | ) | |||||
Payment for the acquisition of International Gaming Systems, Inc. | | (3,435 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of intangible assets | | (406 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (2,268 | ) | (5,227 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||||
Payments on long-term debt | (245 | ) | (35 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 882 | 501 | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 637 | 466 | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 1,785 | (2,088 | ) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 10,131 | 4,233 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 11,916 | $ | 2,145 | |||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities: | |||||||||
Purchase of intangible assets through the incurrence of long-term debt | $ | | $ | 537 | |||||
See accompanying notes.
5
GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JANUARY 31, 2003
(UNAUDITED)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE A. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of January 31, 2003 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-month period ended January 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending October 31, 2003.
The balance sheet at October 31, 2002 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2002.
Certain amounts in the prior period's condensed consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
NOTE B. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized for bingo units placed in bingo halls under contracts based on: (a) a fixed fee per use per session, (b) a fixed weekly fee per unit, or (c) a percentage of the revenue generated by each unit. Revenue recognition is a key component of the Company's results of operations and determines the timing of certain expenses, such as commissions and royalties. The Company recognizes revenue when all of the following factors exist: (a) evidence of an arrangement with the customer; (b) play or availability of the bingo units; (c) a fixed or determinable fee; and (d) collectibility is reasonably assured.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The Company estimates the possible losses resulting from non-payment of outstanding accounts receivable. The Company's customer base consists primarily of entities operating in charitable, Native American, and commercial bingo halls located throughout the United States. In some jurisdictions, the billing and collection function is performed as part of a distributor relationship, and in those instances, the Company maintains allowances for possible losses resulting from non-payment by both the customer and distributor. The Company performs ongoing evaluations of customers and distributors for credit worthiness, economic trends, changes in customer payment terms, and historical collection experience when evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company also reserves a percentage of accounts receivable based on aging category. In determining these percentages, the Company reviews historical write-offs of receivables, payment trends, and other available information.
6
BINGO UNIT DEPRECIATION AND OBSOLESCENCE RESERVES
Bingo units, furniture and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
Bingo units | 3-5 years | |
Office furniture and equipment | 5-7 years | |
Leasehold improvements | 10 years |
The Company provides reserves for excess or obsolete bingo units on hand, which are not expected to be used. The reserves are based upon several factors, including estimated forecast of bingo unit demand for placement into halls.
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In 2001 the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" ("Statement 142"), which the Company early adopted as of November 1, 2001. Under Statement 142, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are subject to an annual impairment review, and depending upon the results of that review the recorded goodwill and intangible assets may be written down and charged to income from operations when their carrying value exceeds their estimated fair value.
NOTE C. ACQUISITION OF ASSETS
In November 2002 the Company acquired certain assets of International Gaming Systems, Inc. ("IGS") for a cash purchase price of $3.4 million. Among other things, the acquisition added to the Company's operations approximately 1,400 fixed-base bingo units in approximately 20 additional bingo halls. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase of a business in accordance with SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations". The Company determined the appropriate purchase price allocation based on estimated fair values at the date of acquisition for tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired to be approximately $600,000 for bingo units and support equipment and approximately $1.0 million for identifiable intangibles with a residual amount of approximately $1.8 million assigned to goodwill.
NOTE D. NET INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
Net income per share of common stock is computed in accordance with SFAS No. 128 "Earnings per Share." The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share is the same except for the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options. The dilution is 76,892 and 915,601 shares for the three months ended January 31, 2003, and 2002, respectively.
NOTE E. LITIGATION
The Company is in litigation with a former distributor in Texas in which each party is seeking damages from the other resulting from alleged material breaches and resultant termination of the related distributor agreement. As a result of the termination of the agreement during the Company's fourth quarter of 2002, the Company fully reserved its existing accounts receivable from the distributor at October 31, 2002, including certain monies received by the distributor and owed to the Company that have been placed in a bank account subject to the court's control. Subsequent collections by the distributor, if any, against accounts receivable existing at the contract termination date will also be placed in that account. In addition, the Company has posted a $450,000 deposit with the court, which is included in other non-current assets, net on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The disposition of the funds (monies held in the bank account and the Company's deposit) is pending the outcome of the litigation. The terms of the distributor agreement contain certain contingent
7
commission liabilities, and other liabilities, which if a final judgment were rendered unfavorable to us, could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. No trial date has been set and there can be no assurance of a favorable outcome of the litigation. The Company has not accrued any liability at January 31, 2003 for this matter.
The Company is in litigation with Capital Gaming Supplies, Inc. ("Capital"), a distributor in Mississippi for IGS. Capital claims that the Company tortiously interfered with alleged existing and prospective customer accounts in Mississippi. The Company has denied the allegations and filed a counter-claim seeking a judgment that Capital tortiously interfered with the Company's customer accounts. In addition, Capital has amended their complaint, adding other claims against the Company and other defendants, including a claim against IGS and its principals. In November 2002, the Company acquired certain assets of IGS (see footnote C) and agreed to assume liability for certain claims filed by Capital against IGS and its principals. The Company has not accrued any liability at January 31, 2003 for this matter and intends to vigorously oppose Capital's claims. No trial date has been set. While the Company has a reasonable basis for believing Capital's claims are without merit, the Company cannot provide any assurance that it will obtain a favorable outcome.
The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings arising out of its operations in the ordinary course of its business. The Company does not believe that any of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, or results of operations beyond the amounts recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. At January 31, 2003, the Company has recorded $130,000, in current liabilities for the estimated settlement of specific lawsuits. However, if settlement is not reached and the lawsuits proceed to trial, an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position and results of operations.
NOTE F. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Effective November 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets" ("Statement 144"). This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. The adoption of Statement 144 did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements and related disclosures.
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections" ("Statement 145"). Statement 145 updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements. Statement 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4 ("Statement 4"), which required all gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. As a result, the criteria in Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 30 will now be used to classify those gains and losses because Statement 4 has been rescinded. Statement 145 amends SFAS No. 13 to require that certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback transactions be accounted for in the same manner as sale-leaseback transactions. This amendment is consistent with the FASB's goal of requiring similar accounting treatment for transactions that have similar economic effects. Statement 145 also makes technical corrections to existing pronouncements. While those corrections are not substantive in nature, in some instances, they may change accounting practice. The Company adopted the provisions of Statement 145 for fiscal 2003, which did not result in a material impact to financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" ("Statement 146"). Statement 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)" ("Issue 94-3"). The principal difference between Statement 146 and Issue 94-3 relates to Statement 146's requirements for recognition of a
8
liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity. Statement 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost as generally defined in Issue 94-3 was recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. A fundamental conclusion reached by the FASB in Statement 146 is that an entity's commitment to a plan, by itself, does not create an obligation that meets the definition of a liability. Therefore, Statement 146 eliminates the definition and requirements for recognition of exit costs in Issue 94-3. Statement 146 also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of Statement 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company does not expect the adoption of Statement 146 will have a material impact on financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue 00-21, "Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements" ("EITF 00-21"). EITF 00-21 addresses how to account for arrangements that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services, and/or rights to use assets. The consensus mandates how to identify whether goods or services or both that are to be delivered separately in a bundled sales arrangement should be accounted for separately because they are "separate units of accounting." The guidance can affect the timing of revenue recognition for such arrangements, even though it does not change rules governing the timing or pattern of revenue recognition of individual items accounted for separately. The final consensus will be applicable to agreements entered into in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2003 with early adoption permitted. Additionally, companies will be permitted to apply the consensus guidance to all existing arrangements as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in accordance with APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes. We are assessing, but at this point do not believe the adoption of EITF 00-21 will have a material impact on the Company's financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation Number 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are effective for interim and annual periods after December 15, 2002 and the Company has adopted those requirements for the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q. The initial recognition and initial measurement requirements of FIN 45 are effective prospectively for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The Company is assessing, but at this point does not believe the adoption of the recognition and initial measurement requirements of FIN 45 will have a material impact on financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure" ("Statement 148"). Statement 148 amends SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," ("Statement 123") and provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Statement 148 also amends the disclosure requirements of Statement 123 to require more prominent and frequent disclosures in financial statements about the effects of stock-based compensation. The transition guidance and annual disclosure provisions of Statement 148 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The interim disclosure provisions are effective for financial reports containing financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. Adoption of Statement 148 is not expected to materially impact the Company's financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation Number 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entitiesan Interpretation of ARB No. 51" ("FIN 46"). FIN 46 addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities that have certain characteristics. Transferors to qualifying special-purpose entities and "grandfathered" qualifying special-purpose entities subject to the reporting requirements of statement 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," are excluded from the scope of FIN 46. FIN 46 is applicable immediately to variable interest entities created or obtained after January 31, 2003. We believe the adoption of FIN 46 will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
9
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report, as well as our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002 contained in our annual report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in this report.
OVERVIEW
We design, develop, and market interactive electronic bingo systems. We currently market portable hand-held systems that can be played anywhere within a bingo hall and a fixed-base system with light pen- or touchscreen-activated monitors. As of January 31, 2003, we had systems in service in over 25 of the more than 30 states that allow electronic bingo systems for use with charitable and commercial organizations. Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or IGRA, electronic bingo may be played on Native American lands in the 46 states where bingo is legal. We estimate that bingo currently is played on tribal Native American lands in 30 states. As of January 31, 2003, we had units in operation in Native American bingo halls in 14 of those states. Collectively, as of January 31, 2003, we had products in 34 states and in 4 countries outside of the United States.
We generate revenue by placing electronic bingo systems in bingo halls under contracts based on (a) a fixed fee per use per session; (b) a fixed weekly fee per unit; or (c) a percentage of the revenues generated by each unit. Revenue growth is affected by player acceptance of electronic bingo as an addition or an alternative to paper bingo, and our ability to expand operations into new markets. Fixed-base bingo units generate greater revenue per unit than portable bingo units, but also require a greater initial capital investment.
We typically install our electronic bingo systems at no charge to our customers, and we capitalize the costs. We record depreciation of bingo equipment over a three- and five-year estimated useful life using the straight-line method of depreciation.
Our expenses consist primarily of (a) cost of revenue, consisting of expenses associated with technical and operational support of the bingo systems within bingo halls, depreciation of bingo units, repair, refurbishment, and disposals of bingo units and related support equipment, and excess or obsolescence reserve; (b) general and administrative, consisting of activities associated with management of our company and related support, which includes finance and accounting, legal, compliance, information systems, human resources, and accounts receivable reserve; (c) sales and marketing, consisting primarily of commissions paid to distributors for promoting and supporting our products and an internal sales force with a focus upon generating new customers and upgrades for existing customers; and (d) research and development (R&D), consisting of Company sponsored R&D activities to provide players with new or enhanced products on which to play bingo.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, the following events occurred that affected, or may in the future affect, our results of operations or liquidity and capital resources.
During the first three-month period of fiscal 2003, our capital expenditures were approximately $2.3 million, $2.2 million of which represented investments in bingo and related support equipment, primarily for our color hand-held unit, the TED2 C.
In November 2002 we acquired certain assets of IGS for a cash purchase price of $3.4 million. Among other things, the acquisition added to our operations approximately 1,400 fixed-base bingo units in approximately 20 additional bingo halls. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase of a business in accordance with SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations". We determined the appropriate
10
purchase price allocation based on estimated fair values at the date of acquisition for tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired to be approximately $600,000 for bingo units and support equipment and approximately $1.0 million for identifiable intangibles with a residual amount of approximately $1.8 million assigned to goodwill.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, bingo unit depreciation, goodwill impairment, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue is recognized for bingo units placed in bingo halls under contracts based on: (a) a fixed fee per use per session, (b) a fixed weekly fee per unit, or (c) a percentage of the revenue generated by each unit. Our revenue recognition is a key component of our results of operations, and determines the timing of certain expenses, such as commissions and royalties. We recognize revenue in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States when all of the following factors exist (a) evidence of an arrangement with the customer; (b) play or availability of the bingo units; (c) a fixed or determinable fee; and (d) collectibility is reasonably assured. We exercise judgment in assessing the creditworthiness of our customers and therefore in our determination of whether collectibility is reasonably assured. Should changes in conditions cause us to determine these criteria are not met for future transactions, revenue recognized for future reporting periods could be adversely affected.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
We estimate the possible losses resulting from non-payment of outstanding accounts receivable. We perform ongoing evaluations of our customers and distributors for creditworthiness, economic trends, changes in our customer payment terms, and historical collection experience when evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts. We also reserve a percentage of our accounts receivable based on aging category. In determining these percentages, we review historical write-offs of our receivables, payment trends, and other available information. While such estimates have been within our expectations and the provisions established, a change in financial condition of specific customers or in overall trends experienced may result in future adjustments of our estimates of recoverability of our receivables.
RESERVE FOR BINGO UNIT OBSOLESCENCE
We provide reserves for excess or obsolete bingo units on hand that we do not expect to be used. Our reserves are based upon several factors, including our estimated forecast of bingo unit demand for placement into halls. Our estimates of future bingo unit demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which
11
case we may have understated or overstated the provision required for excess and obsolete bingo units. Although we attempt to assure the accuracy of our estimated forecasts, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on the value of our bingo units and our reported operating results.
IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
We elected to early adopt Statement of Financial Accounting Standards or SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," during our fiscal year end October 31, 2002, and accordingly we discontinued amortization of our goodwill as of November 1, 2001. We completed the required measurement test as of that date and determined there was no impairment of goodwill upon adoption of SFAS No. 142. This measurement included market multiple methodology and a discounted cash flow methodology.
In addition, we are also required to perform an annual goodwill impairment review, and depending upon the results of that measurement, the recorded goodwill may be written down and charged to income from operations when its carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value. In addition, we assess the impairment of goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, such as a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, unanticipated competition, or a loss of key personnel. The review for fiscal 2002 was completed as of July 31, 2002 (the valuation date), and we determined there was no impairment of goodwill as of that date. Any subsequent impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
We assess the impairment of identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important that could trigger an impairment review include the following:
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended January 31, 2003 Compared with Three Months Ended January 31, 2002
REVENUE. In September 2002, we became aware of a situation involving the unauthorized misuse of our system in Nevada. The misuse involved our fixed-base units and was allegedly the result of the manipulation of the system, for personal gain, by a then employee of our company. In cooperation with regulatory officials in Nevada, Texas and Mississippi, we continued to operate our portable units while we voluntarily shut down our fixed-base units in those states and worked with gaming officials to assure them of the integrity of our system security. Our fixed-base units were restored to service in Texas in a matter of days, while our units in Mississippi returned to service in mid-November and in Nevada by mid-December. Despite the negative effect of the shut down of our fixed-base units, we generated revenue of $13.2 million for the three months ended January 31, 2003
12
compared to $11.9 million for the comparable prior-year period. The $1.3 million, or 11.4%, net increase in revenue from the first quarter of fiscal 2002 was primarily due to increased TED2 C bingo unit placement and the contribution from the IGS units.
COST OF REVENUE. Cost of revenue increased $301,000, or 6.1%, to $5.3 million for the three months ended January 31, 2003 from $5.0 million for the comparable prior-year period. However, as costs did not grow as rapidly as revenue, the cost of revenue as a percent of revenue for the current three-month period decreased to 39.9% compared to 41.9% for the three months ended January 31, 2002. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily due to a $692,000 increase in depreciation as a result of our investment in TED2 C color hand-held units and IGS units. Service and operations increased $194,000 principally for personnel and related costs attributable to the growth in service. These increases were partially offset with a decrease related to disposals of bingo units and equipment expenses that were incurred last year.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative costs increased $905,000, or 45.4%, to $2.9 million for the three months ended January 31, 2003 from $2.0 million for the comparable prior-year period. General and administrative costs as a percent of revenue for the current three-month period were 21.6% compared to 16.8% for the three months ended January 31, 2002. The first quarter of fiscal 2002 included a benefit from reductions of $236,000 and $332,000 to the October 31, 2001 reserves for management incentive compensation and bad debts, respectively. Additionally, legal expenses increased $375,000 above last year partially due to litigation with our former distributor in Texas.
SALES AND MARKETING. Sales, marketing, and commission expenses increased $190,000, or 6.3%, to $3.2 million for the three months ended January 31, 2003 from $3.0 million for the comparable prior-year period. Sales, marketing, and commission expenses as a percent of revenue for the current three-month period were 24.2% compared to 25.3% for the three months ended January 31, 2002. Distributor commissions increased $225,000 to $2.2 million for the three months ended January 31, 2003 primarily due to the 11.4% increase in revenue. Distributor commission expenses, as a percentage of revenue were 17.0% for both quarters. Commissions will fluctuate as the mix of revenue generated by distributors and those customers served directly by us varies.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development costs increased $577,000, or 137.7%, to $996,000 for the three months ended January 31, 2003 from $419,000 for the comparable prior-year period. Research and development costs as a percent of revenue for the current three-month period was 7.5% compared to 3.5% for the three months ended January 31, 2002. The increase is a result of significant growth in the engineering staff and external project costs for new or enhanced products on which to play bingo.
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES. Our income tax provision is recorded at an effective rate of 38.6% for the quarter ended January 31, 2003 compared to 38.2% for the quarter ended January 31, 2002. The effective tax rates reflect the effect of state and federal income taxes on the pre-tax income.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Operating activities provided $2.7 million of cash for the three months ended January 31, 2003 compared to $3.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2002. The $2.7 million consisted primarily of net income of $522,000 plus $2.6 million for depreciation, amortization, and obsolescence provisions minus a net use of funds of $447,000 for other operating assets and liabilities. During fiscal 2002, the $3.4 million provided by operating activities consisted primarily of net income of $913,000 plus depreciation, amortization, and obsolescence provisions of $1.8 million, and $699,000 in other operating assets and liabilities.
13
We used approximately $5.2 million of cash in investing activities for the three months ended January 31, 2003 compared to $2.3 million of cash for the three months ended January 31, 2002. The $5.2 million consisted of $2.3 million of capital expenditures ($2.2 million of which was expended on bingo units and associated support equipment), the purchase of certain assets of IGS and other intangible assets for a total of $3.8 million and a decrease in short-term investments of $931,000. During fiscal 2002, the $2.3 million consisted of $1.9 million of capital expenditures primarily for bingo units and associated support equipment and the purchase of short-term investments of $320,000.
We received net cash of $466,000 in financing activities for the three months ended January 31, 2003 compared to $637,000 for the three months ended January 31, 2002. The $466,000 received for the three months ended January 31, 2003 was primarily proceeds from stock option exercises of $501,000, offset by payments of $35,000 on long-term debt. The $637,000 received for the three months ended January 31, 2002 was primarily proceeds from stock option exercises of $882,000, offset by payments of $245,000 on long-term debt.
As of January 31, 2003, we had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $6.3 million and a receivable for refundable income taxes of approximately $3.6 million, which we expect to convert to cash by the end of our third quarter. In addition to our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, we have a $10.0 million line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., which has an interest rate based on the prime rate or LIBOR plus 2.0%, at our option, on which there was no outstanding balance at January 31, 2003. The revolving credit facility expires on April 2, 2003. We expect to renew the revolving credit facility with similar terms. We believe that cash flow from operations and cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments on hand, together with funds available under the revolving credit facility, will be sufficient to support our operations and provide for budgeted capital expenditures and liquidity requirements through fiscal 2003. Our long-term liquidity requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate at which we expand our business, and whether we do so internally or through acquisitions. In addition, strategic opportunities we may pursue could require us to fund our portion of operating expenses of such ventures and may require us to advance additional amounts should any partners in such ventures be unable to meet unanticipated capital calls or similar funding events. To the extent that the funds generated from the sources described above are insufficient to fund our activities in the long term, we may be required to raise additional funds through public or private financing. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available or that, if it is available, it will be on terms acceptable to us.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo is a $10.0 million line of credit with an interest rate based on the prime rate or London InterBank Offered Rate or LIBOR plus 2.0%, at our option. The line of credit expires on April 2, 2003.
Because the interest rate on the revolving credit facility is variable, our cash flow may be affected by increases in interest rates, in that we would be required to pay more interest in the event that both the prime and LIBOR interest rates increase. We do not believe, however, that any risk inherent in the variable-rate nature of the loan is likely to have a material effect on our interest expense or available cash. We currently maintain a zero balance on the revolving credit facility.
Sensitivity Analysis. Assuming we had a $2.0 million balance outstanding as of January 31, 2003, the rate of interest calculated using the prime rate option would be 4.25%. Our monthly interest payment, if the rate stayed constant, would be $7,083. If the prime rate rose to 8.0%, which assumes an unusually large increase, our monthly payment would be $13,333. A more likely increase of 1.0% or 2.0%, given the recent trend of decreasing or relatively low interest rates, would result in a monthly payment of $8,750 or $10,417, respectively. We do not believe the risk resulting from such fluctuations is material or that the payment required would have a material effect on cash flow.
14
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Based on their evaluation, as of a date within 90 days prior to the date of the filing of this report, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have each concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective and sufficient to ensure that we record, process, summarize, and report information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Subsequent to the date of their evaluation, there have not been any significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, including any corrective action with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This document includes various "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Sections 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events. Statements containing expressions, such as "believes," "anticipates," or "expects," used in our press releases and periodic reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q filed with the Commission, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Although we believe our expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, there can be no assurances that actual results will not materially differ from expected results. We caution that these and similar statements included in this report are further qualified by important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such factors include those discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2002. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date thereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.
15
On March 22, 2001, we filed a claim in the United States District Court, District of Arizona, GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. TREND GAMING SYSTEMS, LLC, CV 01-540 PHX PGR, seeking a declaratory judgment that we are not in material breach of our November 1, 1999 distribution agreement with Trend Gaming Systems, LLC or Trend, and seeking damages for past due payments and wrongful withholdings by Trend. Trend has counterclaimed, alleging that its payments are in compliance with its contractual obligations and that it is entitled to withhold certain monies. Trend also contends that we are in breach of certain of our contractual obligations to Trend or its customers. On December 16, 2002, the court entered at our request an order enjoining Trend from using approximately $540,000 in funds it had collected on our behalf, pending a trial on our ownership interest in those funds. The money has been placed in a bank account subject to the court's control. In addition, collections of accounts receivable by Trend, if any, will also be placed in that account, pending the trial of the case. No trial date has been set. Trend has filed a motion for summary judgment alleging that the termination of the distribution agreement was improper and that motion will be heard on April 24, 2003. We have denied the allegations and intend to vigorously pursue and defend this matter. However, we cannot provide assurance that we will obtain a favorable outcome. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.
On October 30, 2002, Capital Gaming Supplies filed a claim in the United States District Court, Southern District of Mississippi, CAPITAL GAMING SUPPLIES, INC. V. GAMETECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., 3:02 CV 1636 WS, seeking a judgment that we tortiously interfered with alleged existing and prospective customer accounts. We have denied the allegations and filed a counter-claim seeking a judgment that Capital tortiously interfered with our customer accounts. Capital recently filed an amended complaint adding other claims against us and other defendants, including a claim for malicious breach of contract against International Gaming Systems, LLC or IGS, and its principals. In November 2002, we acquired certain assets of IGS and we assumed certain claims filed by Capital against IGS and its principals. Capital seeks compensatory and punitive damages from all defendants. No trial date has been sent. We intend to defend and pursue vigorously this matter. We believe that Capital's claims are without merit. However, we cannot provide assurance that we will obtain a favorable outcome. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.
We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising out of our operations in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe that any of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations beyond the amounts recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. However, if settlement is not reached and the lawsuits proceed to trial, an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Not Applicable
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not Applicable
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not Applicable
16
Not Applicable
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
3.3 | Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Registrant. | |
4.4 |
Specimen Common Stock Certificate |
|
99.1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
99.2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
There were no reports on Form 8-K filed during the quarter ended January 31, 2003.
17
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Signature |
Title |
Date |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
/s/ CLARENCE H. THIESEN Clarence H. Thiesen |
Chief Executive Officer, (Principal Executive Officer) |
March 14, 2003 |
||
/s/ JOHN P. HEWITT John P. Hewitt |
Chief Financial Officer, (Principal Financial Officer) |
March 14, 2003 |
||
/s/ ANN D. MCKENZIE Ann D. McKenzie |
Corporate Controller, (Principal Accounting Officer) |
March 14, 2003 |
18
I, Clarence H. Thiesen, certify that:
Date: March 14, 2003 | /s/ CLARENCE H. THIESEN Clarence H. Thiesen Chief Executive Officer |
19
I, John P. Hewitt, certify that:
Date: March 14, 2003 | /s/ JOHN P. HEWITT John P. Hewitt Chief Financial Officer |
20