SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
ý |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 |
|
OR |
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 1-5231
McDONALD'S CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
36-2361282 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
McDonald's Plaza Oak Brook, Illinois (Address of principal executive offices) |
60523 (Zip Code) |
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (630) 623-3000 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
---|---|---|
Common stock, $.01 par value | New York Stock Exchange Chicago Stock Exchange |
|
8-7/8% Debentures due 2011 | New York Stock Exchange | |
7-3/8% Debentures due 2033 | New York Stock Exchange | |
7.05% Debentures due 2025 | New York Stock Exchange | |
7.31% Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2027 | New York Stock Exchange | |
6-3/8% Debentures due 2028 | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes ý No o
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was $36,208,412,413 as of June 30, 2002. The number of shares of common stock outstanding was 1,268,809,982 as of January 31, 2003.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates information by reference from the registrant's 2002 definitive proxy statement which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
McDonald's Corporation, the registrant, together with its subsidiaries, is referred to herein as the "Company."
(a) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS
During 2002, there have been no significant changes to the Company's corporate structure or material changes in the Company's method of conducting business.
(b) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT SEGMENTS
Segment data for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 are included in Part II, Item 8, page 34 of this Form 10-K.
(c) NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
General
The Company operates in the food service industry and primarily operates and franchises quick-service restaurant businesses under the McDonald's brand. These restaurants serve a varied, yet limited, value-priced menu (see Products) in 119 countries around the world.
The Company also operates other restaurant concepts under its Partner Brands: Boston Market, Chipotle Mexican Grill and Donatos Pizzeria, which are all located primarily in the U.S. In addition, the Company has a minority ownership interest in U.K.-based Pret A Manger. In March 2002, the Company sold its Aroma Café business in the U.K.
Since McDonald's restaurant business comprises virtually all of the Company's consolidated operating results, this narrative primarily relates to the McDonald's restaurant business, unless otherwise noted.
All restaurants are operated by the Company or, under the terms of franchise arrangements, by franchisees who are independent entrepreneurs, or by affiliates operating under joint-venture agreements between the Company and local business people.
The Company's operations are designed to assure consistency and high quality at every McDonald's restaurant. When granting franchises and forming joint-venture agreements, the Company is selective and is not in the practice of franchising to, or partnering with, investor groups or passive investors.
Under the conventional franchise arrangement, franchisees provide capital by initially investing in the equipment, signs, seating and décor of their restaurant businesses, and by reinvesting in the business over time. The Company shares the investment by generally owning or leasing the land and building. Franchisees contribute to the Company's revenue stream through payment of rent and service fees based upon a percent of sales, with specified minimum payments, along with initial fees. The conventional franchise arrangement typically lasts 20 years and franchising practices are generally consistent throughout the world. A discussion regarding site selection is included in Part I, Item 2, page 4 of this Form 10-K.
The Company, its franchisees and affiliates purchase food, packaging, equipment, etc., from numerous independent suppliers who have been approved by the Company. The Company has established and strictly enforces high quality standards. The Company has quality assurance labs around the world that work to ensure that our high standards are consistently met. The quality assurance process not only involves ongoing product reviews, but also on-site inspections of suppliers' facilities. Further, there is a Quality Assurance Board, composed of the Company's technical, safety and supply chain specialists, which provides strategic global leadership for all aspects of food quality and safety. In addition, the Company works closely with suppliers to encourage innovation, assure best practices and drive continuous improvement.
Independently owned and operated distribution centers, also approved by the Company, distribute products and supplies to most McDonald's restaurants. In addition, restaurant personnel are trained in the proper storage, handling and preparation of our products and in the delivery of customer service.
McDonald's global brand is well known. Marketing, promotional and public relations activities are designed to nurture McDonald's brand image and differentiate the Company from competitors. Marketing and promotional efforts focus on value, food taste and the customer experience. In addition, the Company is focused on being a leader in the area of social responsibility, as the Company believes it is important to give back to the people and communities around the world who are responsible for our success.
Products
McDonald's restaurants offer a substantially uniform menu. In addition, McDonald's tests new products on an ongoing basis.
McDonald's menu includes hamburgers and cheeseburgers, Big Mac, Quarter Pounder with Cheese, Big N' Tasty, Filet-O-Fish and several chicken sandwiches, Chicken McNuggets, french fries, salads, milk shakes, McFlurry desserts, sundaes and soft serve cones, pies, cookies and soft drinks and other beverages. In addition, the restaurants sell a variety of other products during limited-time promotions.
McDonald's restaurants operating in the U. S. and certain international markets are open during breakfast hours and offer a full- or limited-breakfast menu. Breakfast offerings may include the Egg McMuffin and Sausage McMuffin with Egg sandwiches, hotcakes, biscuit and bagel sandwiches and muffins.
Chipotle serves gourmet burritos and tacos. Donatos sells pizza, submarine sandwiches and salads. Boston Market is a home-meal replacement concept serving chicken, meatloaf and a variety of other main and side dishes. Pret A Manger is a quick-service food concept that serves mainly prepared and packaged cold sandwiches, snacks and drinks during lunchtime.
Intellectual property
The Company owns valuable intellectual property including trademarks, service marks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other proprietary information, some of which, including "McDonald's," "Ronald McDonald," "Big Mac" and other related marks, are of material importance to the Company's business. The Company also has certain patents on restaurant equipment which, while valuable, are not material to its business.
3
Seasonal operations
The Company does not consider its operations to be seasonal to any material degree.
Working capital practices
Information about the Company's working capital practices is incorporated herein by reference to Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 in Part II, Item 7, pages 9 through 22, and the Consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 in Part II, Item 8, page 26 of this Form 10-K.
Customers
The Company's business is not dependent upon a single customer or small group of customers.
Backlog
Company-operated restaurants have no backlog orders.
Government contracts
No material portion of the business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the U.S. government.
Competition
McDonald's restaurants compete with international, national, regional and local retailers of food products. The Company competes on the basis of price, convenience and service and by offering quality food products. The Company's competition in the broadest perspective includes restaurants, quick-service eating establishments, pizza parlors, coffee shops, street vendors, convenience food stores, delicatessens and supermarkets.
In the U.S., there were about 526,000 restaurants that generated $320 billion in annual sales in 2002. McDonald's restaurant business accounts for 2.6% of those restaurants and 6.3% of the sales. No reasonable estimate can be made of the number of competitors outside the U.S.
Research and development
The Company operates a research and development facility in Illinois. While research and development activities are important to the Company's business, these expenditures are not material. Independent suppliers also conduct research activities for the benefit of the McDonald's System, which includes franchisees and suppliers, as well as the Company, its subsidiaries and joint ventures.
Environmental matters
The Company is not aware of any federal, state or local environmental laws or regulations that will materially affect its earnings or competitive position, or result in material capital expenditures; however, the Company cannot predict the effect on its operations of possible future environmental legislation or regulations. During 2002, there were no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities and no such material expenditures are anticipated.
Number of employees
During 2002, the Company's average number of employees worldwide, including Company-operated restaurant employees, was approximately 413,000. This includes employees at McDonald's Company-operated restaurants as well as other restaurant concepts operated by the Company.
(d) FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS
Financial information about foreign and domestic markets is incorporated herein by reference to Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in Part II, Item 7, pages 9 through 22 and Segment and geographic information in Part II, Item 8, page 34 of this Form 10-K.
(e) AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). The Company therefore files periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Such reports may be obtained by visiting the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549, or by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
Financial and other information can be accessed on the Investor section of the Company's website at www.mcdonalds.com. The Company makes available, free of charge, copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise furnishing it to the SEC. Copies of financial and other information are also available free of charge by calling 1-630-623-7428, or by sending a request to McDonald's Corporation Investor Relations Service Center, McDonald's Plaza, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523.
The Company identifies and develops sites that offer convenience to customers and long-term sales and profit potential to the Company. To assess potential, the Company analyzes traffic and walking patterns, census data, school enrollments and other relevant data. The Company's experience and access to advanced technology aid in evaluating this information. The Company generally owns the land and building or secures long-term land and building leases for restaurant sites, which ensures long-term occupancy rights and helps control related costs. Restaurant profitability for both the Company and franchisees is important; therefore, ongoing efforts are made to control average development costs through construction and design efficiencies and standardization and by leveraging the Company's global sourcing network. Additional information about the Company's properties is included in
4
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in Part II, Item 7, pages 9 through 22 and in Financial statements and supplementary data in Part II, Item 8, pages 23 through 39 of this Form 10-K.
The Company has pending a number of lawsuits which have been filed from time to time in various jurisdictions. These lawsuits cover a broad variety of allegations spanning the Company's entire business. The following is a brief description of the more significant of these categories of lawsuits. In addition, the Company is subject to various federal, state and local regulations that impact various aspects of its business, as discussed below. The Company does not believe that any such claims, lawsuits or regulations will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Franchising
A substantial number of McDonald's restaurants are franchised to independent entrepreneurs operating under arrangements with the Company. In the course of the franchise relationship, occasional disputes arise between the Company and its franchisees relating to a broad range of subjects including, but not limited to, quality, service and cleanliness issues, contentions regarding grants or terminations of franchises, franchisee claims for additional franchises or rewrites of franchises, and delinquent payments. Additionally, occasional disputes arise between the Company and individuals who claim they should have been granted a McDonald's franchise.
Suppliers
The Company and its affiliates and subsidiaries do not supply, with minor exceptions outside the U.S., food, paper or related items to any McDonald's restaurants. The Company relies upon numerous independent suppliers that are required to meet and maintain the Company's high standards and specifications. On occasion, disputes arise between the Company and its suppliers on a number of issues including, by way of example, compliance with product specifications and the Company's business relationship with suppliers. In addition, disputes occasionally arise on a number of issues between the Company and individuals or entities who claim that they should be (or should have been) granted the opportunity to supply products or services to the Company's restaurants.
Employees
Thousands of people are employed by the Company and in restaurants owned and operated by subsidiaries of the Company. In addition, thousands of people, from time to time, seek employment in such restaurants. In the ordinary course of business, disputes arise regarding hiring, firing and promotion practices.
Customers
The Company's restaurants serve a large cross-section of the public. In the course of serving so many people, disputes arise as to products, service, accidents, advertising, nutritional and other disclosures as well as other matters typical of an extensive restaurant business such as that of the Company.
Intellectual property
The Company has registered trademarks and service marks, some of which are of material importance to the Company's business. The Company also has certain patents on restaurant equipment which, while valuable, are not material to its business. From time to time, the Company may become involved in litigation to defend and protect its use of its intellectual property.
Government regulations
Local, state and federal governments have adopted laws and regulations involving various aspects of the restaurant business, including, but not limited to, franchising, health, safety, environment, zoning and employment. The Company does not believe that it is in violation of any existing statutory or administrative rules, but it cannot predict the effect on its operations from the issuance of additional requirements in the future.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SHAREHOLDERS
None.
THE FOLLOWING ARE THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY:
Claire H. Babrowski, 45, is President of McDonald's Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa, a position to which she was appointed in June 2001. From January 2000 to June 2001 she was Executive Vice President, Worldwide Restaurant Systems; from June 1998 to January 2000 she was Executive Vice President, U.S. Restaurant Systems; and from May 1997 to June 1998 she was Senior Vice President, U.S. Restaurant Systems. Ms. Babrowski has been with the Company for 25 years.
Charles H. Bell, 42, is President and Chief Operating Officer, effective January 2003. From June 2001 to December 2002 he was President of McDonald's Europe; from September 1999 to June 2001 he was President of McDonald's Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa; and from 1993 to September 1999 he was Managing Director of McDonald's Australia. Mr. Bell has been with the Company for 27 years.
James R. Cantalupo, 59, is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, a position to which he was appointed effective January 2003. From January to December 31, 2002 he was Vice Chairman, Emeritus and President, Emeritus. From December 1999 to December 2001 he was Vice Chairman and President. From August 1998 to December 1999 he was Vice Chairman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of McDonald's International. From January 1992 to August 1998 he was President and Chief Executive Officer, McDonald's International. Mr. Cantalupo has been with the Company for 29 years.
5
Mats Lederhausen, 39, is President of the Business Development Group, a position to which he was appointed in January 2003. From July 2001 to January 2003 he served as Executive Vice President of Strategy and Corporate Development; from December 2000 to July 2001 he served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy; and from April 1999 to July 2000 he served as Vice President. Before joining McDonald's corporate staff, Mr. Lederhausen was Managing Director and Joint-Venture Partner for Svenska McDonald's Development AB, a subsidiary of the Company. He is no longer Managing Director and Joint-Venture Partner of that subsidiary. Mr. Lederhausen has been with the McDonald's System for 18 years.
M. Lawrence Light, 61, is Corporate Executive Vice PresidentGlobal Chief Marketing Officer. He has served in that position since joining the Company in September 2002. Prior to joining McDonald's, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Arcature, a brand consultancy. Mr. Light has been with the Company for less than one year.
Matthew H. Paull, 51, is Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, a position to which he was elected in July 2001. Prior to that time, he served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Tax and Finance from December 2000 to July 2001; Senior Vice President from January 2000 to December 2000; and Vice President from June 1993 to January 2000. Mr. Paull has been with the Company for 9 years.
David M. Pojman, 43, is Corporate Senior Vice PresidentController, a position he has held since March 2002. Previously, he served as Vice President and Assistant Corporate Controller from January 2000 to March 2002; and from July 1997 to January 2000 he served as Vice PresidentInternational Controller. Mr. Pojman has been with the Company for 20 years.
Michael J. Roberts, 52, is PresidentMcDonald's USA, a position he has held since June 2001. From July 1997 to June 2001 he was President, West Division. Mr. Roberts has been with the Company for 25 years.
Eduardo Sanchez, 45, is PresidentLatin America and Canada Group, a position to which he was appointed in January 2003. Previously, he was President of the Latin America Group from May 1999 to January 2003; and International Relationship Partner for Latin America from November 1995 to May 1999. Mr. Sanchez has been with the Company for 26 years.
Gloria Santona, 52, is Corporate Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, a position she has held since June 2001. From December 2000 to June 2001 she was Vice President, U.S. General Counsel and Secretary; and from March 1997 to December 2000 she was Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Secretary. Ms. Santona has been with the Company for 25 years.
James A. Skinner, 58, is Vice Chairman. Mr. Skinner was appointed to his current position effective January 2003. Previously, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of McDonald's Worldwide Restaurant Group from February 2002 to December 2002. Prior to that, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of McDonald's Europe, Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa from June 2001 to February 2002; and President of McDonald's Europe from December 1997 to June 2001. Mr. Skinner has been with the Company for 32 years.
Russell P. Smyth, 46, is PresidentMcDonald's Europe, a position to which he was appointed in January 2003. Previously, he served as President of Partner Brands from December 2001 to January 2003; International Relationship Partner for Southeast and Central Asia from May 1999 to December 2001; and Vice President of the Latin America Group from July 1996 to May 1999. Mr. Smyth has been with the Company for 19 years.
Stanley R. Stein, 60, is Executive Vice President, Corporate Human Resources, a position he has held since July 1997. Prior to that time, Mr. Stein served as Senior Vice President. Mr. Stein has been with the Company for 28 years.
Item 5A. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The Company's common stock trades under the symbol MCD and is listed on the New York and Chicago stock exchanges in the U.S.
The following table sets forth the common stock price ranges on the New York Stock Exchange composite tape and dividends declared per common share.
|
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOLLARS PER SHARE |
||||||||||||
High |
Low |
Dividend |
High |
Low |
Dividend |
|||||||
Quarter: | ||||||||||||
First | 29.06 | 25.38 | | 35.06 | 24.75 | | ||||||
Second | 30.72 | 27.00 | | 30.96 | 25.39 | | ||||||
Third | 28.62 | 17.42 | | 31.00 | 26.00 | | ||||||
Fourth | 19.95 | 15.17 | .235 | 30.10 | 25.00 | .225 | ||||||
Year | 30.72 | 15.17 | .235 | 35.06 | 24.75 | .225 | ||||||
The approximate number of shareholders of record and beneficial owners of the Company's common stock as of January 31, 2003 was estimated to be 1,032,000.
Given the Company's returns on equity and assets, management believes it is prudent to reinvest a significant portion of earnings back into the business and use excess cash flow for debt repayments and share repurchases. Accordingly, the common stock dividend yield is modest. The Company has paid dividends on common stock for 27 consecutive years through 2002 and has increased the dividend amount at least once every year. Additional dividend increases will be considered after reviewing returns to shareholders, profitability expectations, financing needs and tax treatment of dividends. Dividends are declared and paid on an annual basis. As in the past, future dividends will be declared at the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.
6
Item 5B. EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table summarizes information about our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2002. All outstanding awards relate to our common stock. Shares awarded under all of the following plans may be from the Company's treasury or may be otherwise acquired in the open market.
Plan category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) | 129,653,669 | $ | 24.74 | 33,044,007 | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2) | 69,205,034 | $ | 32.87 | 200,000 | |||
Total | 198,858,703 | $ | 27.57 | 33,244,007 | |||
2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan. 29,673,065 shares
1992 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan. no shares
1975 Stock Ownership Option Plan. 3,370,942 shares
Directors' Stock Plan. The Plan provides an opportunity for outside directors and senior directors to defer some or all of their annual retainers and Board and Committee meeting fees. In addition, each director receives a credit of $17,500 to his or her plan account at the end of each full year of service, up to a maximum of 10 years. Each director's plan account is credited with a number of shares as though the deferred amounts had been invested in the Company's common stock, and the number of shares is adjusted for dividends paid on the Company's common stock. Upon retirement, or a date specified by the director, the director receives cash payments based on the value of the shares credited to the director's account, in a lump sum or, if the director elects, in installments for a period of up to 15 years. A director may elect to receive payment in the form of shares of common stock.
1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. The Plan provided for the granting of stock options to non-employee directors. There were initial stock option grants of 5,000 shares to directors when they joined the board; and an annual stock option grant of 5,000 shares as of the date the director was elected or re-elected at the Company's annual meeting of shareholders. Options have a ten-year term and become exercisable in increments of 33% on the first, second and third anniversary dates of the grant. No future grants will be made under this plan.
The Deferred Income Plan, now part of the Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, was adopted to enable participants to defer receipt of all or any portion of their incentive payments and up to 90% of their base pay. Payments under this plan may be in cash or shares. There are 200,000 shares in this plan.
Of the 69,205,034 shares to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, 69,011,034 shares were added to the 1992 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan and the 1975 Stock Ownership Option Plan without security holder approval.
7
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
11-YEAR SUMMARY
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1995 |
1994 |
1993 |
1992 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total revenues | $ | 15,406 | 14,870 | 14,243 | 13,259 | 12,421 | 11,409 | 10,687 | 9,795 | 8,321 | 7,408 | 7,133 | ||||||||||||
Operating income | $ | 2,113 | (1) | 2,697 | (2) | 3,330 | 3,320 | 2,762 | (3) | 2,808 | 2,633 | 2,601 | 2,241 | 1,984 | 1,862 | |||||||||
Income before taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 1,662 | (1) | 2,330 | (4) | 2,882 | 2,884 | 2,307 | (3) | 2,407 | 2,251 | 2,169 | 1,887 | 1,676 | 1,448 | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 893 | (1,5) | 1,637 | (4) | 1,977 | 1,948 | 1,550 | (3) | 1,642 | 1,573 | 1,427 | 1,224 | 1,083 | 959 | |||||||||
Cash provided by operations | $ | 2,890 | 2,688 | 2,751 | 3,009 | 2,766 | 2,442 | 2,461 | 2,296 | 1,926 | 1,680 | 1,426 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 2,004 | 1,906 | 1,945 | 1,868 | 1,879 | 2,111 | 2,375 | 2,064 | 1,539 | 1,317 | 1,087 | ||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | $ | 687 | 1,090 | 2,002 | 933 | 1,162 | 765 | 605 | 321 | 500 | 628 | 92 | ||||||||||||
Financial position at year end: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 23,971 | 22,535 | 21,684 | 20,983 | 19,784 | 18,242 | 17,386 | 15,415 | 13,592 | 12,035 | 11,681 | ||||||||||||
Total debt | $ | 9,979 | 8,918 | 8,474 | 7,252 | 7,043 | 6,463 | 5,523 | 4,836 | 4,351 | 3,713 | 3,857 | ||||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity | $ | 10,281 | 9,488 | 9,204 | 9,639 | 9,465 | 8,852 | 8,718 | 7,861 | 6,885 | 6,274 | 5,892 | ||||||||||||
Shares outstanding IN MILLIONS |
1,268 | 1,281 | 1,305 | 1,351 | 1,356 | 1,371 | 1,389 | 1,400 | 1,387 | 1,415 | 1,454 | |||||||||||||
Per common share: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net incomebasic(5) | $ | .70 | (1) | 1.27 | (4) | 1.49 | 1.44 | 1.14 | (3) | 1.17 | 1.11 | .99 | .84 | .73 | .65 | |||||||||
Net incomediluted(5) | $ | .70 | (1) | 1.25 | (4) | 1.46 | 1.39 | 1.10 | (3) | 1.15 | 1.08 | .97 | .82 | .71 | .63 | |||||||||
Dividends declared | $ | .24 | .23 | .22 | .20 | .18 | .16 | .15 | .13 | .12 | .11 | .10 | ||||||||||||
Market price at year end | $ | 16.08 | 26.47 | 34.00 | 40.31 | 38.41 | 23.88 | 22.69 | 22.56 | 14.63 | 14.25 | 12.19 | ||||||||||||
Franchised sales | $ | 25,692 | 24,838 | 24,463 | 23,830 | 22,330 | 20,863 | 19,969 | 19,123 | 17,146 | 15,756 | 14,474 | ||||||||||||
Company-operated sales | $ | 11,500 | 11,040 | 10,467 | 9,512 | 8,895 | 8,136 | 7,571 | 6,863 | 5,793 | 5,157 | 5,103 | ||||||||||||
Affiliated sales | $ | 4,334 | 4,752 | 5,251 | 5,149 | 4,754 | 4,639 | 4,272 | 3,928 | 3,048 | 2,674 | 2,308 | ||||||||||||
Total Systemwide sales(6) | $ | 41,526 | 40,630 | 40,181 | 38,491 | 35,979 | 33,638 | 31,812 | 29,914 | 25,987 | 23,587 | 21,885 | ||||||||||||
Franchised restaurants | 17,864 | 17,395 | 16,795 | 15,949 | 15,086 | 14,197 | 13,374 | 12,186 | 10,944 | 9,918 | 9,237 | |||||||||||||
Company-operated restaurants | 9,000 | 8,378 | 7,652 | 6,059 | 5,433 | 4,887 | 4,294 | 3,783 | 3,216 | 2,733 | 2,551 | |||||||||||||
Affiliated restaurants | 4,244 | 4,320 | 4,260 | 4,301 | 3,994 | 3,844 | 3,216 | 2,330 | 1,739 | 1,476 | 1,305 | |||||||||||||
Total Systemwide restaurants(7) | 31,108 | 30,093 | 28,707 | 26,309 | 24,513 | 22,928 | 20,884 | 18,299 | 15,899 | 14,127 | 13,093 | |||||||||||||
8
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NATURE OF BUSINESS
The Company operates in the food service industry and primarily operates and franchises quick-service restaurant businesses under the McDonald's brand (McDonald's restaurants). Approximately 80% of McDonald's restaurants and about 75% of the total revenues of McDonald's restaurants are in nine markets: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Japan (a 50%-owned affiliate accounted for under the equity method), the United Kingdom and the United States. Throughout this discussion, McDonald's restaurant businesses in these nine markets collectively are referred to as "major markets."
The Company also operates other restaurant concepts under its Partner Brands: Boston Market, Chipotle Mexican Grill and Donatos Pizzeria. In addition, the Company has a minority ownership in Pret A Manger. In March 2002, the Company sold its Aroma Café business in the U.K.
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS
Operating results |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
|||||||||||||||
Amount |
Increase/(decrease) |
Amount |
Increase/(decrease) |
Amount |
|||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||
Sales by Company-operated restaurants | $ | 11,500 | 4 | % | $ | 11,041 | 5 | % | $ | 10,467 | |||||
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants | 3,906 | 2 | 3,829 | 1 | 3,776 | ||||||||||
Total revenues | 15,406 | 4 | 14,870 | 4 | 14,243 | ||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses | |||||||||||||||
Company-operated restaurants | 9,907 | 5 | 9,454 | 8 | 8,750 | ||||||||||
Franchised restaurants | 840 | 5 | 800 | 4 | 772 | ||||||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses | 1,713 | 3 | 1,662 | 5 | 1,587 | ||||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net | 833 | nm | 257 | nm | (196 | ) | |||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 13,293 | 9 | 12,173 | 12 | 10,913 | ||||||||||
Operating income | 2,113 | (22 | ) | 2,697 | (19 | ) | 3,330 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 374 | (17 | ) | 452 | 5 | 430 | |||||||||
McDonald's Japan IPO gain | nm | (137 | ) | nm | |||||||||||
Nonoperating expense, net | 77 | 48 | 52 | nm | 18 | ||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change | 1,662 | (29 | ) | 2,330 | (19 | ) | 2,882 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 670 | (3 | ) | 693 | (23 | ) | 905 | ||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | 992 | (39 | ) | 1,637 | (17 | ) | 1,977 | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | (99 | ) | nm | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 893 | (45 | )% | $ | 1,637 | (17 | )% | $ | 1,977 | |||||
Per common sharediluted: | |||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | .77 | (38 | )% | $ | 1.25 | (14 | )% | $ | 1.46 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.07 | ) | nm | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | .70 | (44 | )% | $ | 1.25 | (14 | )% | $ | 1.46 | |||||
STRATEGIC ACTIONS
In 2002, the Company initiated several strategic actions designed to optimize existing restaurant operations and improve the business. These actions were consistent with management's strategy of concentrating its capital and resources on the best near-term opportunities and of avoiding those that distract from restaurant-level execution. They included the restructuring of certain markets, the closing of a significant number of underperforming restaurants, the decision to terminate a long-term technology project, and the consolidation of certain home office facilities and elimination of positions to control costs, streamline operations and reallocate resources.
In 2001, the Company implemented strategic changes and restaurant initiatives in the U.S. and certain international markets. The changes in the U.S. included streamlining operations by reducing the number of regions and divisions, enabling the Company to combine staff functions and improve efficiency.
The Company recorded charges and/or gains associated with these actions in 2002 and 2001 as "significant items." Significant items generally represent charges and/or gains for actions or transactions related to the implementation of special initiatives of the Company or items that are unusual or infrequent in nature. The Company does not include these items when reviewing business performance trends,
9
because management does not believe these are indicative of ongoing operations.
The Company recorded $853 million of significant items in 2002 and $253 million of significant items in 2001. All significant items for both years were recorded in other operating expense, except as noted in the discussion that follows.
Significant itemsexpense/(income)
|
|
|
|
|
Per common sharediluted |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pretax |
After tax |
|||||||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS |
|||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | $ | 267 | $ | 200 | $ | 244 | $ | 136 | $ | .19 | $ | .11 | |||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 402 | 135 | 336 | 107 | .26 | .08 | |||||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 184 | 55 | 120 | 37 | .10 | .03 | |||||||||||||
McDonald's Japan IPO gain | (137 | ) | (137 | ) | (.11 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total significant items(1) | $ | 853 | $ | 253 | $ | 700 | $ | 143 | $ | .55 | $ | .11 | |||||||
Restructuring chargesrestructuring markets and eliminating positions
In 2002, the Company recorded $267 million of pretax charges related to transferring ownership in four countries in the Middle East and Latin America to developmental licensees (approximately 150 restaurants), ceasing operations in three countries in Latin America (approximately 20 restaurants), and eliminating positions (approximately 600 positions, about half of which were in the U.S. and half of which were in international markets), reallocating resources and consolidating certain home office facilities to control costs. Under the developmental license business structure, which the Company successfully employs in more than 25 markets outside the U.S. (approximately 350 restaurants), the licensee owns the business, including the real estate interest. While the Company generally does not have any capital invested in these markets, it receives a royalty based on a percent of sales.
The 2002 restructuring charges consisted of: $136 million of asset write-offs and losses on the sale of assets and $65 million of costs for leases and other obligations in the markets restructured or exited, $56 million of severance and other employee-related costs, $15 million of lease cancellation and other costs related to the closing of certain home office facilities, and $10 million of payments made to facilitate a change of ownership from U.S. franchisees who have had a history of financial difficulty and consequently were unable to deliver the level of operational excellence needed to succeed in the future. These changes were partially offset by a $15 million reversal of accrued restructuring costs recorded in 2001, primarily due to lower employee-related costs than originally estimated.
In 2001, the Company recorded $200 million of pretax restructuring charges related to the strategic changes and restaurant initiatives in the U.S. and certain international markets. The initiatives were designed to improve the restaurant experience and included accelerated operations training, restaurant simplification, incentives for outstanding restaurant operations and an enhanced national restaurant evaluation system. In connection with these initiatives, the Company eliminated approximately 850 positions, consisting of 700 positions in the U.S., primarily in the divisions and regions, and 150 positions in international markets.
The 2001 restructuring charges consisted of: $114 million of severance and other employee-related costs, $69 million of lease cancellation and other costs related to the closing of region and division facilities, and $17 million of other cash costs, primarily consisting of payments made to facilitate a change of ownership from U.S. franchisees who have had a history of financial difficulty and consequently were unable to deliver the level of operational excellence needed to succeed in the future.
Restaurant closings/asset impairment
In 2002, the Company recorded $402 million of pretax charges consisting of: $302 million related to management's decision to close 751 underperforming restaurants (234 were closed in 2002 and 517 will close throughout 2003) primarily in the U.S. and Japan, and $100 million primarily related to the impairment of assets for certain existing restaurants in Europe and Latin America. Most of the restaurants identified for closing had negative cash flows and/or very low annual sales volumes. Also, in many cases they would have required significant capital investment over the next several years to remain financially viable.
In 2001, the Company recorded $135 million of pretax charges consisting of: $91 million related to the closing of 163 underperforming restaurants in international markets in 2001, a $24 million asset impairment charge due to an assessment of the ongoing impact of Turkey's significant currency devaluation on our business, and $20 million related to the disposition of Aroma Café in the U.K.
Although restaurant closings occur each year, these 2002 and 2001 restaurant closing charges are identified as "significant items" because they were the result of separate intensive reviews by management in conjunction with other strategic actions.
Technology write-offs and other charges
In 2002, the Company recorded $184 million of pretax charges consisting of: $170 million primarily related to the write-off of software development costs as a result of management's decision to terminate a long-term technology project, and $14 million primarily related to the write-off of receivables and inventory in Venezuela as a result of the temporary closure of all McDonald's restaurants due to the national strike that began in early December. Although the terminated technology project was projected to deliver long-term benefits, it was no longer viewed as the best use of capital in the current environment, as the anticipated Systemwide cost over several years was expected to be in excess of $1 billion.
In 2001, the Company recorded $55 million of pretax charges consisting of: $18 million primarily related to the write-off of certain technology, $12 million (recorded in nonoperating expense) primarily related to the write-off of a corporate investment, and $25 million primarily related to
10
the unrecoverable costs incurred in connection with the theft of winning game pieces from the Company's Monopoly and certain other promotional games over an extended period of time, and the related termination of the supplier of the game pieces. Fifty individuals (none of whom were Company employees) were convicted of conspiracy and/or mail fraud charges.
McDonald's Japan IPO gain
In 2001, McDonald's Japan, the Company's largest market in the Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa (APMEA) segment, completed an IPO of 12 million shares. The Company owns 50% of McDonald's Japan, while the Company's founding partner Den Fujita and his family own approximately 26%. The Company recorded a $137 million gain (pre and after tax) in nonoperating income to reflect an increase in the carrying value of its investment as a result of the cash proceeds from the IPO received by McDonald's Japan.
EFFECT OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES ON REPORTED RESULTS
While changing foreign currencies affect reported results, McDonald's lessens exposures, where practical, by financing in local currencies, hedging certain foreign-denominated cash flows and by purchasing goods and services in local currencies.
Effect of foreign currency translation on consolidated reported resultspositive/(negative)
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 15 | $ | (457 | ) | $ | (594 | ) | ||
Operating income | 90 | (78 | ) | (151 | ) | |||||
Net income | 42 | (50 | ) | (92 | ) | |||||
Net income per common sharediluted | .04 | (.04 | ) | (.07 | ) | |||||
In 2002, foreign currency translation had a minimal impact on the revenue growth rate as the stronger Euro and British Pound were offset by weaker Latin American currencies (primarily the Argentine Peso, Brazilian Real and Venezuelan Bolivar). The operating income growth rate for 2002 was positively impacted by foreign currency translation primarily due to the stronger Euro and British Pound. In 2001, foreign currency translation had a negative impact on the growth rates primarily due to the weaker Euro, British Pound, Australian Dollar, Japanese Yen and Canadian Dollar.
All information presented in constant currencies excludes the effect of foreign currency translation on reported results except for hyperinflationary economies, whose functional currency is the U.S. Dollar. Constant currency results are calculated by translating the current year results at prior year average exchange rates.
SYSTEMWIDE SALES
Systemwide sales include sales by all restaurants, whether operated by the Company, by franchisees or by affiliates operating under joint-venture agreements. Management believes that Systemwide sales information is useful in analyzing the Company's revenues because franchisees and affiliates pay rent, service fees and/or royalties that generally are based on a percent of sales with specified minimum payments.
Systemwide sales
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS |
As reported amount |
As reported |
Constant currency(1) |
As reported amount |
As reported |
Constant currency(1) |
As reported amount |
||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 20,306 | 1 | % | na | $ | 20,051 | 2 | % | na | $ | 19,573 | |||||
Europe | 10,476 | 11 | 5 | % | 9,412 | 1 | 5 | % | 9,293 | ||||||||
APMEA | 6,776 | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 7,010 | (6 | ) | 3 | 7,477 | |||||||
Latin America | 1,444 | (17 | ) | 4 | 1,733 | (3 | ) | 6 | 1,790 | ||||||||
Canada | 1,456 | 1 | 2 | 1,447 | | 5 | 1,443 | ||||||||||
Partner Brands | 1,068 | 9 | 9 | 977 | 61 | 62 | 605 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 41,526 | 2 | % | 2 | % | $ | 40,630 | 1 | % | 4 | % | $ | 40,181 | |||
Restaurant expansion, partly offset by negative comparable sales, drove the consolidated constant currency sales increases in 2002 and 2001.
Sales in the U.S. increased in 2002 and 2001 due to expansion. Results in 2002 reflected the overall slowdown in the restaurant industry and increased competition.
The primary contributors to Europe's constant currency sales growth in both years were France and Russia. In addition, the U.K. contributed to the increases in 2002 and 2001, although comparable sales were negative in both years. Europe's results for both years were impacted by negative comparable sales in Germany, where the economy continued to contract. We expect the difficult economic conditions in Germany to continue in the near term. In 2001, despite the Company's outstanding quality and safety record, Europe's results were negatively impacted by consumer confidence issues regarding the European beef supply in several markets.
Sales results in APMEA declined in 2002 in constant currencies primarily due to negative comparable sales in Japan, which were in part due to continuing weak economic conditions, partly offset by a strong performance in Australia and expansion in China. In 2001, the constant currency sales increase was driven by strong results in China, partly offset by weak results in Japan, Taiwan and Turkey, and weak consumer spending in Australia. Beginning in late 2001 and continuing in 2002, sales were also dampened by consumer confidence issues regarding food safety throughout Japan.
In Latin America, constant currency sales increased in both 2002 and 2001, despite the fact that many markets continued to be impacted by weak economic conditions. The increase in 2002 was primarily due to positive comparable sales in Brazil and expansion in Mexico, while in 2001 positive comparable sales in Mexico and Venezuela drove the increase.
The Company expects the weak economic conditions in many markets in APMEA (including Japan) and Latin America to continue in the near term.
11
In Canada, constant currency sales increased in 2002 due to expansion, partly offset by negative comparable sales, while the 2001 constant currency sales increase was driven by positive comparable sales and expansion.
The sales increase in Partner Brands in 2002 was primarily due to expansion and positive comparable sales at Chipotle. The sales increase in 2001 was primarily due to the acquisition of Boston Market in second quarter 2000. In addition, expansion of Chipotle along with strong comparable sales at Chipotle and Boston Market helped drive the increase in 2001.
Comparable salesMcDonald's restaurants
|
Increase/(decrease) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
U.S. | (1.5 | )% | 0.1 | % | 1.0 | % | |
Europe | 1.0 | (1.4 | ) | 0.4 | |||
APMEA | (8.5 | ) | (4.8 | ) | (0.1 | ) | |
Latin America | 1.0 | (3.9 | ) | (3.6 | ) | ||
Canada | (2.5 | ) | 1.3 | 4.7 | |||
Brand McDonald's | (2.1 | )% | (1.3 | )% | 0.6 | % | |
Average annual salesMcDonald's restaurants
Average sales per restaurant in constant currencies are affected by comparable sales as well as the size, location and number of new restaurants. The number of new restaurants affects average sales because new restaurants typically take a few years to reach long-term sales volumes. In addition, over the last several years more restaurants outside the U.S. have opened in less populated areas and in countries with lower average sales volumes and correspondingly lower average development costs.
Average annual salesMcDonald's restaurants
|
|
|
|
Constant currency increase/(decrease)(2) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
As reported amounts |
|||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS |
||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Per restaurant(1) | ||||||||||||||
Traditional: | ||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 1,628 | $ | 1,650 | $ | 1,647 | (1 | )% | | |||||
Europe | 1,821 | 1,722 | 1,851 | | (4 | )% | ||||||||
APMEA | 1,091 | 1,190 | 1,376 | (8 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||
Latin America | 931 | 1,154 | 1,333 | 1 | (5 | ) | ||||||||
Canada | 1,395 | 1,469 | 1,530 | (4 | ) | | ||||||||
Satellite: | ||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 554 | $ | 546 | $ | 536 | 1 | % | 2 | % | ||||
Outside the U.S.(3) | 483 | 533 | 598 | (7 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
In 2002, average annual sales per traditional restaurant in the U.S. declined slightly primarily due to negative comparable sales. In Europe, average annual sales per traditional restaurant were relatively flat in constant currencies. In APMEA and Canada, average annual sales per traditional restaurant declined in constant currencies primarily due to negative comparable sales and the impact of new restaurants. In Latin America, average annual sales per traditional restaurant increased slightly in constant currencies due to positive comparable sales. All segments benefited from the closing of underperforming restaurants in 2002 and 2001.
In 2001, average annual sales per traditional restaurant were relatively flat for the U.S. and Canada in constant currencies. In other segments, negative comparable sales and the significant number of new restaurants, partly offset by the benefit of closing underperforming restaurants, drove the decreases in average annual sales per traditional restaurant.
Satellite restaurants generally have significantly lower development costs and sales volumes than traditional restaurants. The use of these small, limited-menu restaurants has allowed profitable expansion into areas that otherwise would not be feasible (e.g., discount retail stores and airports). In 2002 and 2001, average annual sales for satellite restaurants increased in the U.S. This was due in part to our continued assessment of the appropriate use of these limited-menu sites and the closing of certain low-volume sites. Outside the U.S., average annual sales for satellite restaurants declined in constant currencies in both years primarily due to negative comparable sales in Japan, where the majority of satellites outside the U.S. are located. In connection with the restaurant closings previously discussed, the Company's Japanese affiliate will close more than 100 satellite restaurants in 2003.
REVENUES
Revenues include sales by Company-operated restaurants and fees from restaurants operated by franchisees or affiliates under joint-venture agreements. These fees include rent, service fees and/or royalties that are based on a percent of sales with specified minimum payments along with initial fees. Fees vary by type of site and investment by the Company and also according to local business conditions. These fees, along with occupancy and operating rights, are stipulated in franchise agreements that generally have 20-year terms.
Revenues grow as sales build in existing restaurants and as new restaurants are added. Menu price changes also affect revenues and sales, but it is impractical to quantify their impact because of different pricing structures, new products, promotions and product-mix variations among restaurants and markets.
Systemwide sales and revenues may grow at different rates during a given period, primarily due to a change in the mix of Company-operated, franchised and affiliated restaurants. For example, this mix is impacted by purchases and sales of restaurants between the Company and franchisees. Company-operated restaurants generated about 30% of Systemwide sales and about 75% of revenues for all periods presented.
12
Revenues
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS |
As reported amount |
As reported |
Constant currency(1) |
As reported amount |
As reported |
Constant currency(1) |
As reported amount |
||||||||||
Company-operated sales: | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 3,172 | 1 | % | na | $ | 3,139 | 2 | % | na | $ | 3,064 | |||||
Europe | 3,982 | 7 | 2 | % | 3,727 | | 4 | % | 3,730 | ||||||||
APMEA | 2,115 | 9 | 8 | 1,938 | 4 | 11 | 1,857 | ||||||||||
Latin America | 696 | (15 | ) | 12 | 821 | 7 | 18 | 764 | |||||||||
Canada | 505 | 6 | 7 | 478 | (2 | ) | 2 | 490 | |||||||||
Partner Brands | 1,030 | 10 | 10 | 938 | 67 | 67 | 562 | ||||||||||
Total Company-operated sales | $ | 11,500 | 4 | % | 4 | % | $ | 11,041 | 5 | % | 9 | % | $ | 10,467 | |||
Franchised and affiliated revenues: | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 2,251 | | na | $ | 2,257 | 3 | % | na | $ | 2,195 | ||||||
Europe | 1,154 | 13 | % | 6 | % | 1,025 | | 4 | % | 1,024 | |||||||
APMEA | 253 | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | 265 | 8 | 21 | 245 | ||||||||
Latin America | 118 | (21 | ) | (8 | ) | 150 | (19 | ) | (11 | ) | 185 | ||||||
Canada | 128 | (2 | ) | | 130 | 4 | 8 | 125 | |||||||||
Partner Brands | 2 | | | 2 | | | 2 | ||||||||||
Total franchised and affiliated revenues | $ | 3,906 | 2 | % | 1 | % | $ | 3,829 | 1 | % | 4 | % | $ | 3,776 | |||
Total revenues: | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 5,423 | 1 | % | na | $ | 5,396 | 3 | % | na | $ | 5,259 | |||||
Europe | 5,136 | 8 | 3 | % | 4,752 | | 4 | % | 4,754 | ||||||||
APMEA | 2,368 | 7 | 7 | 2,203 | 5 | 12 | 2,102 | ||||||||||
Latin America | 814 | (16 | ) | 9 | 971 | 2 | 12 | 949 | |||||||||
Canada | 633 | 4 | 6 | 608 | (1 | ) | 3 | 615 | |||||||||
Partner Brands | 1,032 | 10 | 10 | 940 | 67 | 67 | 564 | ||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 15,406 | 4 | % | 4 | % | $ | 14,870 | 4 | % | 8 | % | $ | 14,243 | |||
On a constant currency basis, total revenues increased at a higher rate than Systemwide sales in 2002 primarily due to significantly lower sales from our affiliate in Japan. Under our affiliate structure, we record a royalty in revenues based on a percentage of Japan's sales, whereas all of Japan's sales are included in Systemwide sales. For this reason, Japan's sales decline had a larger negative impact on Systemwide sales than on revenues. In 2001, total revenues increased at a higher rate than Systemwide sales primarily due to the second quarter 2000 acquisition of Boston Market restaurants, which were all Company-operated, and the restructuring of our ownership in the Philippines, effective July 1, 2001. As a result of the restructuring, most of our restaurants in the Philippines are now Company-operated rather than franchised. In addition, revenues in 2001 benefited from an increase in the royalty percent received from our Japanese affiliate, effective January 1, 2001.
In the U.S., growth rates for Systemwide sales and total revenues were similar in 2002 and 2001. In both periods, Europe's total revenue growth rates were lower than the Systemwide sales growth rates primarily due to a lower percentage of Company-operated restaurants and an increase in rent assistance to franchisees compared with the prior year. APMEA's total revenue growth rates were higher than the Systemwide sales growth rates for both periods primarily due to our affiliate structure in Japan and a higher percentage of Company-operated restaurants, in part due to the restructuring of the Philippines. In addition, the total revenue growth rate in 2001 benefited from an increase in the royalty percent received from our Japanese affiliate. In Latin America, total revenue growth rates were higher than Systemwide sales growth rates for both periods primarily due to a higher percentage of Company-operated restaurants compared with the prior year.
OPERATING INCOME
Consolidated operating income decreased $584 million or 22% in 2002 and $633 million or 19% in 2001; however, significant charges of $853 million in 2002 and $378 million in 2001 were included in operating income. Operating income for both years included higher selling, general & administrative expenses and lower other operating income. Combined operating margin dollars were higher in 2002 than in 2001 and lower in 2001 than in 2000.
Operating income from the major markets accounted for substantially all of consolidated operating income in 2002, 2001 and 2000.
The following table presents reported operating income amounts and growth rates along with the growth rates adjusted for foreign currency translation and significant items. Adjusted constant currency operating income is one of the primary measures used to evaluate segment performance, because management believes that adjusted constant currency operating income reflects the most accurate representation of ongoing business operations.
Operating income
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
|||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS |
As reported amount |
As reported |
Adjusted constant currency(1) |
As reported amount |
As reported |
Adjusted constant currency(1) |
As reported amount |
|||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 1,673 | 3 | % | (2 | )% | $ | 1,622 | (10 | )% | | $ | 1,795 | |||||
Europe | 1,022 | (4 | ) | | 1,063 | (10 | ) | (3 | )% | 1,180 | ||||||||
APMEA | 64 | (80 | ) | (23 | ) | 325 | (28 | ) | (10 | ) | 451 | |||||||
Latin America | (133 | ) | nm | nm | 11 | (89 | ) | (46 | ) | 103 | ||||||||
Canada | 125 | 1 | 2 | 124 | (2 | ) | 10 | 126 | ||||||||||
Partner Brands | (66 | ) | | 22 | (66 | ) | (61 | ) | | (41 | ) | |||||||
Corporate | (572 | ) | (50 | ) | (8 | ) | (382 | ) | (35 | ) | (22 | ) | (284 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 2,113 | (22 | )% | (6 | )% | $ | 2,697 | (19 | )% | (5 | )% | $ | 3,330 | ||||
13
The following table presents reconciliations of reported operating results to adjusted constant currency operating results by segment for both 2002 and 2001.
Reconciliation of reported operating results to adjusted constant currency operating results
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS |
U.S. |
Europe |
APMEA |
Latin America |
Canada |
Partner Brands |
Corporate |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
As reported operating income (loss) | $ | 1,673 | $ | 1,022 | $ | 64 | $ | (133 | ) | $ | 125 | $ | (66 | ) | $ | (572 | ) | $ | 2,113 | ||||||
Restructuring charges | 25 | 9 | 141 | 66 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 267 | |||||||||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 74 | 135 | 81 | 62 | 4 | 31 | 15 | 402 | |||||||||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 4 | 14 | 4 | 162 | 184 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Currency effect | (61 | ) | (6 | ) | (22 | ) | 2 | (87 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted constant currency operating income (loss) | $ | 1,772 | $ | 1,109 | $ | 280 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 137 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | (374 | ) | $ | 2,879 | ||||||
2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
As reported operating income (loss) | $ | 1,622 | $ | 1,063 | $ | 325 | $ | 11 | $ | 124 | $ | (66 | ) | $ | (382 | ) | $ | 2,697 | |||||||
Restructuring charges | 156 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 20 | 200 | |||||||||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 39 | 35 | 37 | 4 | 20 | 135 | |||||||||||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 25 | 4 | 14 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Currency effect | 37 | 38 | 4 | 5 | 84 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted constant currency operating income (loss) | $ | 1,803 | $ | 1,146 | $ | 405 | $ | 55 | $ | 139 | $ | (41 | ) | $ | (348 | ) | $ | 3,159 | |||||||
U.S. adjusted operating income decreased 2% in 2002 and was relatively flat in 2001 compared with 2000. The decrease in 2002 was due to lower combined operating margin dollars and lower other operating income, partly offset by lower selling, general & administrative expenses. Other operating income included $22 million of payments made to U.S. owner/operators to facilitate the introduction of a new front counter team service system. In 2001, higher combined operating margin dollars were offset by higher selling, general & administrative expenses and slightly lower other operating income. U.S. adjusted operating income accounted for more than 50% of consolidated adjusted operating income in 2002, 2001 and 2000.
Europe's adjusted operating income accounted for more than 35% of consolidated adjusted operating income in 2002, 2001 and 2000. Europe's adjusted operating income was relatively flat in 2002 compared with 2001 and decreased 3% in 2001. The segment's results benefited from strong performances in France and Russia in both years; however, difficult economic conditions in Germany and weak results in the U.K. negatively impacted results. In 2001, consumer confidence issues regarding the European beef supply negatively impacted Europe's results. France, Germany and the U.K. accounted for about 75% of Europe's adjusted operating income in all three years.
APMEA's adjusted operating income decreased 23% in 2002 and 10% in 2001. In 2002, strong results in Australia were more than offset by weak results in Japan and Hong Kong. In 2001, strong results in China, the increase in the royalty percent received from our affiliate in Japan and a gain on the sale of real estate in Singapore were more than offset by weak results in Australia, Japan, Taiwan and Turkey. Australia, Japan and China accounted for about 70% of APMEA's adjusted operating income in all three years.
Latin America's adjusted operating income declined significantly for both periods due to the continuing difficult economic conditions experienced by most markets in the segment. In addition, Latin America's results in 2002 were negatively impacted by a higher provision for uncollectible receivables as well as the temporary closure of all McDonald's restaurants in Venezuela due to the national strike that began in early December 2002. Although the strike ended in February 2003, the Company expects the continued turmoil in Venezuela to impact results in 2003.
The adjusted operating results for the Partner Brands improved 22% in 2002 and were flat in 2001 compared with 2000. The improvement in 2002 was primarily driven by the elimination of goodwill amortization beginning January 1, 2002 and continued strong results at Chipotle.
The Corporate segment reflected higher spending on technology in 2002 and 2001.
OPERATING MARGINS
Operating margin information and discussions relate to McDonald's restaurants only and exclude Partner Brands.
Company-operated margins
Company-operated margin dollars represent sales by Company-operated restaurants less the operating costs of these restaurants. Company-operated margin dollars declined $12 million in 2002 and $145 million in 2001. In constant currencies, Company-operated margin dollars declined $41 million or 3% in 2002 and $96 million or 6% in 2001.
14
The constant currency decreases in both years were primarily due to negative comparable sales and higher labor rates, partly offset by expansion.
Company-operated marginsMcDonald's restaurants
IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | $ | 507 | $ | 501 | $ | 521 | ||||
Europe | 631 | 626 | 683 | |||||||
APMEA | 239 | 240 | 296 | |||||||
Latin America | 66 | 83 | 95 | |||||||
Canada | 70 | 75 | 75 | |||||||
Total | $ | 1,513 | $ | 1,525 | $ | 1,670 | ||||
PERCENT OF SALES | ||||||||||
U.S. | 16.0 | % | 16.0 | % | 17.0 | % | ||||
Europe | 15.9 | 16.8 | 18.3 | |||||||
APMEA | 11.3 | 12.4 | 15.9 | |||||||
Latin America | 9.4 | 10.1 | 12.4 | |||||||
Canada | 13.7 | 15.6 | 15.4 | |||||||
Total | 14.4 | % | 15.1 | % | 16.9 | % | ||||
Operating cost trends as a percent of sales were as follows: food & paper costs decreased in 2002 and increased in 2001; payroll costs as well as occupancy & other operating expenses increased for both periods.
The U.S. Company-operated margin percent in 2002 benefited from the elimination of goodwill amortization and a lower contribution rate to the national co-op for advertising expenses. However, these benefits were offset by negative comparable sales and higher labor costs. Food & paper costs were lower as a percent of sales in 2002 and 2001, while payroll costs were higher in both years. Occupancy & other operating expenses as a percent of sales were lower in 2002 than in 2001 and higher in 2001 than in 2000.
Europe's Company-operated margins as a percent of sales declined in 2002, primarily due to higher payroll and occupancy costs, partly offset by lower food & paper costs as a percent of sales. In 2001, Europe's Company-operated margin percent declined, primarily due to higher payroll costs and negative comparable sales.
In APMEA, negative comparable sales in 2002 and 2001 affected Company-operated margins as a percent of sales. In 2001, a change in restaurant classification in the Philippines also contributed to APMEA's margin decline because its Company-operated margins were lower than the average for the segment. In Latin America, declines in margins as a percent of sales in both years were due to difficult economic conditions in most markets. In Canada, negative comparable sales in 2002 affected Company-operated margins as a percent of sales.
Franchised margins
Franchised margin dollars represent revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants less the Company's occupancy costs (rent and depreciation) associated with those sites. Franchised margin dollars represented more than 60% of the combined operating margins in 2002, 2001 and 2000. Franchised margin dollars increased $36 million in 2002 and $26 million in 2001. In constant currencies, franchised margin dollars were relatively flat in 2002 and increased $91 million or 3% in 2001. The constant currency increase in 2001 was primarily driven by expansion and an increase in the Japan royalty percent.
Franchised marginsMcDonald's restaurants
IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | $ | 1,781 | $ | 1,799 | $ | 1,765 | ||||
Europe | 885 | 792 | 802 | |||||||
APMEA | 217 | 229 | 199 | |||||||
Latin America | 79 | 103 | 135 | |||||||
Canada | 102 | 105 | 101 | |||||||
Total | $ | 3,064 | $ | 3,028 | $ | 3,002 | ||||
PERCENT OF REVENUES | ||||||||||
U.S. | 79.1 | % | 79.7 | % | 80.4 | % | ||||
Europe | 76.7 | 77.2 | 78.3 | |||||||
APMEA | 85.8 | 86.2 | 81.5 | |||||||
Latin America | 66.9 | 68.4 | 73.0 | |||||||
Canada | 79.2 | 80.4 | 80.2 | |||||||
Total | 78.5 | % | 79.1 | % | 79.5 | % | ||||
The declines in the consolidated franchised margin percent in 2002 and 2001 reflected negative comparable sales, higher rent assistance to franchisees primarily in the U.S. and Europe, and higher occupancy costs, due in part to an increased proportion of leased sites in all geographic segments. APMEA's franchised margin percent in both years benefited from the restructuring of our ownership in the Philippines in July 2001. The restructuring resulted in the reclassification of restaurants and related margins, that were lower than the average for the segment, from franchised to Company-operated. In addition, the franchised margin percent in APMEA in 2001 benefited from the increase in the Japan royalty percent.
15
SELLING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Consolidated selling, general & administrative expenses increased 3% in 2002 and 5% in 2001 (4% and 7% in constant currencies). The increase in 2002 was primarily due to increased spending on technology in the Corporate segment, higher advertising expenses in the U.S. primarily related to the introduction of the Dollar Menu, and higher expenses for Partner Brands. The increase in 2001 was due to increased spending on technology in the Corporate segment and higher expenses for Partner Brands, partly offset by lower Company-wide performance-based incentive compensation compared with the prior year. Selling, general & administrative expenses as a percent of sales were 4.1% in 2002 and 2001 and 4.0% in 2000.
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
Increase/(decrease) |
|
||||||||||||
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS |
As reported amount |
As reported |
Constant currency(1) |
As reported amount |
As reported |
Constant currency(1) |
As reported amount |
||||||||||
U.S. | $ | 558 | (1 | )% | na | $ | 563 | 1 | % | na | $ | 559 | |||||
Europe | 359 | 9 | 4 | % | 328 | (2 | ) | 1 | % | 336 | |||||||
APMEA | 158 | 4 | 3 | 152 | 2 | 9 | 149 | ||||||||||
Latin America | 102 | (19 | ) | 3 | 126 | 5 | 14 | 120 | |||||||||
Canada | 49 | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | 51 | (6 | ) | (2 | ) | 54 | ||||||
Partner Brands | 114 | 13 | 12 | 102 | 20 | 20 | 85 | ||||||||||
Corporate(2) | 373 | 10 | na | 340 | 20 | na | 284 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,713 | 3 | % | 4 | % | $ | 1,662 | 5 | % | 7 | % | $ | 1,587 | |||
OTHER OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET
Other operating (income) expense includes gains on sales of restaurant businesses, equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, restructuring charges, restaurant closings/asset impairment charges and other transactions related to franchising and the food service business.
Other operating (income) expense, net
IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gains on sales of restaurant businesses | $ | (114 | ) | $ | (112 | ) | $ | (87 | ) | |||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | (24 | ) | (63 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||||
Team service system paymentsU.S. | 22 | |||||||||||
Bad debts and other expense | 96 | 54 | 12 | |||||||||
Significant items:(1) | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | 267 | 200 | ||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 402 | 135 | ||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 184 | 43 | ||||||||||
Total significant items | 853 | 378 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 833 | $ | 257 | $ | (196 | ) | |||||
Gains on sales of restaurant businesses
Gains on sales of restaurant businesses include gains from sales of Company-operated restaurants as well as gains from exercises of purchase options by franchisees with business facilities lease arrangements (arrangements where the Company leases the businesses, including equipment, to franchisees who have options to purchase the businesses). The Company's purchases and sales of businesses with its franchisees and affiliates are aimed at achieving an optimal ownership mix in each market. Resulting gains or losses are recorded in operating income because the transactions are an integral part of our business.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliatesbusinesses in which the Company actively participates but does not controlis reported after interest expense and income taxes, except for U.S. restaurant partnerships, which are reported before income taxes. The decrease in 2002 was due to a net loss from our Japanese affiliate. The decrease in 2001 was due to lower earnings from our Japanese affiliate, the increase in Japan's royalty expense and a weaker Japanese Yen. Although the increase in royalty expense reduced McDonald's equity in earnings for Japan in 2001 compared with 2000, it was more than offset at the operating income level by the royalty benefit McDonald's received in franchised revenues.
Team service system payments
In 2002, the Company made payments to U.S. owner/operators to facilitate the introduction of a new front counter team service system.
Bad debts and other expense
Bad debts and other expense for 2002 and 2001 increased primarily due to higher provisions for uncollectible receivables (primarily in Europe and Latin America). In addition, other expense for 2002 was partly offset by a benefit from the elimination of goodwill amortization.
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense decreased in 2002 due to lower average interest rates, partly offset by higher average debt levels and stronger foreign currencies. Interest expense increased in 2001 due to higher average debt levels, partly offset by weaker foreign currencies and lower average interest rates. Average debt levels were higher in both years because the Company used its available credit capacity to repurchase shares of its common stock.
NONOPERATING EXPENSE, NET
Nonoperating expense includes miscellaneous income and expense items such as interest income, minority interests, and gains and losses related to other investments, financings and translation. Nonoperating expense in 2002 reflected higher minority interest expense and foreign currency translation losses in 2002 compared with foreign currency translation gains in 2001. In addition, nonoperating expense in 2001 included $12 million primarily related to the write-off of a corporate investment as well as minority interest expense related to the sale of real estate in Singapore.
16
The following table presents the reported effective income tax rates as well as the effective income tax rates excluding significant items.
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reported effective income tax rates | 40.3 | % | 29.8 | % | 31.4 | % | |
Impact of significant items(1) | (7.6 | ) | 1.3 | | |||
Effective income tax rates, excluding significant items | 32.7 | % | 31.1 | % | 31.4 | % | |
The 2001 effective income tax rate reflected a benefit from the impact of tax law changes in certain international markets and the 2000 effective income tax rate reflected a tax benefit resulting from an international transaction.
Consolidated net deferred tax liabilities included tax assets, net of valuation allowance, of $867 million in 2002 and $720 million in 2001. Substantially all of the net tax assets arose in the U.S. and other profitable markets.
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTING CHANGE
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which eliminates the amortization of goodwill and instead subjects it to annual impairment tests. As a result of the initial required goodwill impairment test, the Company recorded a noncash charge of $99 million after tax ($0.07 per diluted share) in first quarter 2002 to reflect the cumulative effect of this accounting change. The impaired goodwill was primarily in Argentina, Uruguay and other markets in Latin America and the Middle East, where economies have weakened significantly in recent years.
NET INCOME AND NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
In 2002, income before the cumulative effect of the goodwill accounting change decreased $645 million or 39%, and diluted income per common share before the cumulative effect of this accounting change decreased $0.48 or 38%. Net income, which included the charge for the cumulative effect of the accounting change decreased 45% and diluted net income per common share decreased 44%. In 2001, net income decreased $340 million or 17% and diluted net income per common share decreased $0.21 or 14%. Results for 2002 included significant charges of $700 million or $0.55 per share, and results for 2001 included significant items totaling $143 million or $0.11 of expense per share discussed on page 9.
CASH FLOWS
The Company generates significant cash from operations and has substantial credit capacity to fund operating and discretionary spending. Cash from operations totaled $2.9 billion and exceeded capital expenditures by $886 million in 2002, while cash from operations totaled $2.7 billion and exceeded capital expenditures by $782 million in 2001. Cash provided by operations, along with borrowings and other sources of cash, is used for capital expenditures, share repurchases, dividends and debt repayments. The Company expects to use future cash provided by operations to fund the remaining employee severance and lease obligations associated with the significant charges in 2002 and 2001.
Cash provided by operations
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash provided by operations | $ | 2,890 | $ | 2,688 | $ | 2,751 | ||||
Cash provided by operations as a percent of capital expenditures | 144 | % | 141 | % | 141 | % | ||||
Cash provided by operations as a percent of average total debt | 31 | % | 31 | % | 35 | % | ||||
In addition to its cash provided by operations, the Company can meet short-term funding needs through commercial paper borrowings and line of credit agreements. Accordingly, the Company purposefully maintains a relatively low current ratio, which was .71 at year-end 2002.
RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Systemwide restaurants at year end(1)
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | 13,491 | 13,099 | 12,804 | |||||
Europe | 6,070 | 5,794 | 5,460 | |||||
APMEA | 7,555 | 7,321 | 6,771 | |||||
Latin America | 1,605 | 1,581 | 1,510 | |||||
Canada | 1,304 | 1,223 | 1,154 | |||||
Partner Brands: | ||||||||
Boston Market | 662 | 657 | 707 | |||||
Chipotle | 232 | 177 | 104 | |||||
Donatos | 181 | 197 | 156 | |||||
Other | 8 | 44 | 41 | |||||
Total Partner Brands | 1,083 | 1,075 | 1,008 | |||||
Total | 31,108 | 30,093 | 28,707 | |||||
In 2002, the Company opened 1,247 traditional McDonald's restaurants and 392 satellite restaurants, and closed 474 traditional restaurants and 158 satellite restaurants. In 2001, the Company opened 1,406 traditional McDonald's restaurants and 383 satellite restaurants, and closed 335 traditional restaurants and 135 satellite restaurants.
In 2002, about 85% of McDonald's restaurant additions occurred in the major markets. Approximately 60% of Company-operated restaurants and more than 85% of franchised restaurants were located in the major markets at the end of 2002. Franchisees and affiliates operated 73% of
17
McDonald's restaurants at year-end 2002. Partner Brand restaurants are primarily Company-operated.
Capital expenditures increased $98 million or 5% in 2002 and decreased $39 million or 2% in 2001. The increase in capital expenditures in 2002 was primarily due to higher spending for McDonald's restaurant business in the U.S. and Canada, partly offset by lower capital expenditures for new restaurants in Latin America. The decrease in 2001 was primarily due to lower spending in Europe and Latin America and weaker foreign currencies, partly offset by additional expenditures for Partner Brands as well as for McDonald's restaurant business in the U.S. and China. Capital expenditures for McDonald's restaurants in 2002, 2001 and 2000 reflected our strategy of leasing a higher proportion of new sites and also the U.S. building program, which gave franchisees the option to own new restaurant buildings.
The Company's expenditures for new restaurants in the U.S. were lower than they would have been as a result of the leasing strategy and the U.S. building program. About 65% in 2002 and 80% in 2001 of new and rebuilt U.S. traditional franchised and affiliated restaurant buildings were purchased by franchisees and affiliates. Beginning in 2003, to give our best franchisees additional financial flexibility to purchase more McDonald's restaurant businesses as well as to reinvest in their existing restaurants, the Company plans to purchase buildings for new franchised restaurants. As a result of owning the buildings, the Company expects to collect additional rent from the franchisees. In addition, the Company is purchasing a higher proportion of land for new restaurants in the U.S.
The Company and its affiliates owned 38% of the land for its restaurant sites at year-end 2002 and 2001. For leased land, the Company maintains long-term occupancy rights for the land and receives related rental income.
Capital expenditures invested in major markets excluding Japan represented approximately 70% of the total in 2002 and 60% in 2001 and 2000. (Japan is accounted for under the equity method, and accordingly, its capital expenditures are not included in consolidated amounts.)
Capital expenditures
IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New restaurants | $ | 1,161 | $ | 1,198 | $ | 1,308 | |||
Existing restaurants(1) | 659 | 571 | 507 | ||||||
Other properties(2) | 184 | 137 | 130 | ||||||
Total | $ | 2,004 | $ | 1,906 | $ | 1,945 | |||
Total assets | $ | 23,971 | $ | 22,535 | $ | 21,684 | |||
Average development costs incurred by the U.S. System (land, building and equipment) for new traditional McDonald's restaurants were $1.7 million in 2002 and 2001 and $1.6 million in 2000.
Average development costs outside the U.S. vary widely by market depending on the types of restaurants built and the real estate and construction costs within each market. These costs, which include land, buildings and equipment owned by the Company, are managed through the use of optimally sized restaurants, construction and design efficiencies, standardization and global sourcing. In addition, foreign currency fluctuations affect average development costs.
Average development costs for new traditional McDonald's restaurants in major markets outside the U.S. excluding Japan were approximately $1.6 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000. Average annual sales for new traditional McDonald's restaurants in the same markets were about $1.3 million in 2002 and 2001 and $1.5 million in 2000. Average development costs for new satellite restaurants (excluding lease costs) located in Canada, Germany and Japan, which comprise about 95% of the satellites outside the U.S., were about $250,000 in 2002 and about $220,000 in 2001 and 2000. The use of these small, limited-menu restaurants, for which the land and building generally are leased, has allowed expansion into areas that otherwise would not have been feasible.
Capital expenditures by affiliates in international markets, primarily Japan, which were not included in consolidated amounts, were about $204 million in 2002, $181 million in 2001 and $204 million in 2000.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company and six unaffiliated companies that supply the "McDonald's System" (McDonald's franchisees, suppliers and the Company) are equal owners of System Capital Corporation (SCC). SCC's purpose is to provide funding to McDonald's franchisees, suppliers to the McDonald's System and McDonald's Corporation and to build equity within SCC that will benefit the McDonald's System. No employees of SCC are employees of the seven shareholders. SCC competes with other lenders who provide similar financing to McDonald's franchisees and suppliers and the Company has no independent obligation to provide financing to these franchisees and suppliers. SCC's function is similar to that of a cooperative and its primary operating activities include (1) providing loans to qualifying U.S. franchisees to purchase existing restaurant businesses as well as finance equipment, buildings and working capital, (2) purchasing accounts receivable and financing inventory and other needs of eligible suppliers and distributors, and (3) acquiring land and leasing it to McDonald's Corporation for new restaurants, primarily in the U.S.
SCC assets totaled $1.7 billion at December 31, 2002. See summary of significant accounting policies on page 31 for further details on SCC.
SHARE REPURCHASES AND DIVIDENDS
During 2002, the Company purchased 25.6 million shares of McDonald's stock for approximately $687 million, of which 20.1 million shares for $536 million were under a new $5.0 billion share repurchase program.
During 2001 and 2000, the Company sold 12.2 million and 16.8 million common equity put options, respectively, in connection with its share repurchase program. Premiums received were recorded in shareholders' equity as a reduction of the cost of treasury stock purchased and were $32 million
18
in 2001 and $56 million in 2000. In 2002, 10.1 million common equity put options were exercised and 2.1 million options expired unexercised, while 21.0 million options were exercised in 2001. The total amount paid to acquire these shares as a result of the options being exercised was $286 million in 2002 and $700 million in 2001. At December 31, 2002, there were no common equity put options outstanding. At December 31, 2001, the $350 million total exercise price of outstanding options was classified in common equity put options and forward contracts in the Consolidated balance sheet, and the related offset was recorded in common stock in treasury, net of premiums received.
During 2001, the Company also entered into equity forward contracts in connection with its share repurchase program. At December 31, 2001, the $151 million total purchase price of the forward contracts was classified in common equity put options and forward contracts in the Consolidated balance sheet, and the related offset was recorded in common stock in treasury. The forward contracts for 5.5 million shares settled in March 2002, and there were no additional forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2002.
The Company has paid dividends on common stock for 27 consecutive years and has increased the dividend amount every year. Additional dividend increases will be considered after reviewing returns to shareholders, profitability expectations, financing needs and tax treatment of dividends. Cash dividends are declared and paid on an annual basis. As in the past, future dividends will be declared at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
FINANCIAL POSITION AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
TOTAL ASSETS AND RETURNS
Total assets grew by $1.4 billion or 6% in 2002 and $851 million or 4% in 2001. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates increased total assets by approximately $785 million in 2002 and decreased total assets by approximately $765 million in 2001. At year-end 2002 and 2001, approximately 65% of consolidated assets was located in the major markets excluding Japan. Net property and equipment rose $1.3 billion in 2002 and represented 78% of total assets at year end.
Operating income is used to compute return on average assets, while income before cumulative effect of accounting change is used to calculate return on average common equity. Month-end balances are used to compute both average assets and average common equity.
Returns on assets and equity
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Return on average assets | 9.2 | % | 12.3 | % | 15.9 | % | |
Return on average common equity | 8.9 | 17.5 | 21.6 | ||||
Adjusted return on average assets(1) |
12.9 |
% |
14.1 |
% |
na |
||
Adjusted return on average common equity(1) | 16.8 | 19.1 | na | ||||
Return on average assets and return on average common equity both declined in 2002 and 2001, primarily due to weak operating results in APMEA and Latin America. During 2003, the Company will continue to concentrate McDonald's restaurant openings in markets with acceptable returns and will significantly reduce the amount of capital we invest in APMEA and Latin America, where returns have been pressured in recent years by weak economies.
FINANCINGS AND MARKET RISK
The Company generally borrows on a long-term basis and is exposed to the impact of interest-rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations. Debt obligations at December 31, 2002 totaled $10.0 billion compared with $8.9 billion at December 31, 2001. The increase in 2002 was due to the impact of changes in exchange rates on foreign currency-denominated debt ($645 million), SFAS No. 133 noncash fair value adjustments ($271 million), and an increase in net borrowings ($145 million).
Debt highlights(1)
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed-rate debt as a percent of total debt(2) | 62 | % | 45 | % | 58 | % | |
Weighted-average annual interest rate of total debt | 4.1 | 5.4 | 5.8 | ||||
Foreign currency-denominated debt as a percent of total debt(2) | 64 | 57 | 60 | ||||
Total debt as a percent of total capitalization (total debt and total shareholders' equity) | 49 | 48 | 48 | ||||
Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch currently rate McDonald's commercial paper P-1, A-1 and F1 and its long-term debt A2, A+ and A, respectively. The Company has not historically experienced difficulty in obtaining financing or refinancing existing debt. Certain of the Company's debt obligations contain cross-acceleration provisions and restrictions on Company and subsidiary mortgages and the long-term debt of certain subsidiaries. In addition, the Company is required to maintain a minimum net worth (defined as consolidated assets less consolidated liabilities) of $5 billion to comply with its line of credit agreements. There are no provisions in the Company's debt obligations that would accelerate repayment of debt as a result of a change in credit ratings. The Company has $1.3 billion available under committed line of credit agreements (see debt financing note on page 35) as well as $1.8 billion under a U.S. shelf registration and $700 million under a Euro Medium-Term Notes program for future debt issuance.
The Company uses major capital markets, bank financings and derivatives to meet its financing requirements and reduce interest expense. The Company manages its debt portfolio in response to changes in interest rates and foreign currency rates by periodically retiring, redeeming and repurchasing debt, terminating exchange agreements and using derivatives.
19
The Company does not use derivatives with a level of complexity or with a risk higher than the exposures to be hedged and does not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes. All exchange agreements are over-the-counter instruments.
In December 2002, the Company terminated certain interest-rate exchange agreements to effectively create fixed-rate financing for $1.8 billion of debt at interest rates that were near all-time low yields, and to reduce the potential exposure in the Company's future interest expense due to a rise in interest rates.
In managing the impact of interest-rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations, the Company uses interest-rate exchange agreements and finances in the currencies in which assets are denominated. All derivatives were recorded at fair value in the Company's Consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2002 as follows: miscellaneous other assets$134 million; other long-term liabilities (excluding interest)$39 million; and accrued payroll and other liabilities$24 million. See summary of significant accounting policies related to financial instruments on page 29 for additional information regarding their use and the impact of SFAS No. 133 regarding derivatives.
The Company uses foreign currency debt and derivatives to hedge certain foreign currency royalties, intercompany financings and long-term investments in foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. This reduces the impact of fluctuating foreign currencies on cash flows and shareholders' equity. Total foreign currency denominated debt, including the effects of foreign currency exchange agreements, was $6.2 billion and $5.0 billion at year-end 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company does not have significant exposure to any individual counterparty and has master agreements that contain netting arrangements. Certain of these agreements also require each party to post collateral if credit ratings fall below, or aggregate exposures exceed, certain contractual limits. During 2002, certain counterparties were required to post collateral as aggregate exposures exceeded certain contractual limits due to increased values. At December 31, 2002, collateral in the amount of $2.2 million was posted by a counterparty while the Company was not required to collateralize any of its obligations.
The Company actively hedges selected currencies to minimize the cash exposure of foreign currency royalty and other payments received in the U.S. In addition, where practical, McDonald's restaurants purchase goods and services in local currencies resulting in natural hedges, and the Company typically finances in local currencies, creating economic hedges.
The Company's net asset exposure is diversified among a broad basket of currencies. At year-end 2002 and 2001, assets in hyperinflationary markets were principally financed in U.S. Dollars. The Company's largest net asset exposures (defined as foreign currency assets less foreign currency liabilities) at year end were as follows:
Foreign currency net asset exposures
IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS |
2002 |
2001 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Euro | $ | 1,536 | $ | 1,251 | ||
British Pounds Sterling | 700 | 786 | ||||
Canadian Dollars | 808 | 738 | ||||
Australian Dollars | 620 | 516 | ||||
Brazilian Reais | 385 | 490 | ||||
The Company prepared sensitivity analyses of its financial instruments to determine the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates on the Company's results of operations, cash flows and the fair value of its financial instruments. The interest-rate analysis assumed a one percentage point adverse change in interest rates on all financial instruments but did not consider the effects of the reduced level of economic activity that could exist in such an environment. The foreign currency rate analysis assumed that each foreign currency rate would change by 10% in the same direction relative to the U.S. Dollar on all financial instruments; however, the analysis did not include the potential impact on sales levels or local currency prices or the effect of fluctuating currencies on the Company's anticipated foreign currency royalties and other payments received in the U.S. Based on the results of these analyses of the Company's financial instruments, neither a one percentage point adverse change in interest rates from 2002 levels nor a 10% adverse change in foreign currency rates from 2002 levels would materially affect the Company's results of operations, cash flows or the fair value of its financial instruments.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The Company has long-term contractual obligations primarily in the form of lease obligations (related to both Company-operated and franchised restaurants) and debt obligations. In addition, the Company has long-term revenue and cash flow streams that relate to its franchise arrangements. Cash provided by operations (including cash provided by these franchise arrangements) along with our borrowing capacity and other sources of cash will be used to satisfy the obligations. The following table summarizes the Company's contractual obligations and their aggregate maturities as well as future minimum rent payments due to the Company under existing franchise arrangements as of December 31, 2002. (See discussions of cash flows, financial position and capital resources as well as the Notes to the December 31, 2002 consolidated financial statements for further details.)
20
Contractual cash flows
|
Outflows |
Inflows |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS |
Operating leases |
Debt obligations(1) |
Minimum rent under franchise arrangements |
||||||
2003 | $ | 913 | $ | 337 | $ | 1,735 | |||
2004 | 848 | 975 | 1,707 | ||||||
2005 | 789 | 2,017 | 1,662 | ||||||
2006 | 735 | 1,014 | 1,613 | ||||||
2007 | 683 | 663 | 1,566 | ||||||
Thereafter | 6,059 | 4,609 | 13,127 | ||||||
Total | $ | 10,027 | $ | 9,615 | $ | 21,410 | |||
In addition to long-term obligations, the Company had guaranteed certain affiliate and other loans totaling $102 million at December 31, 2002.
OUTLOOK FOR 2003
OTHER MATTERS
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company's consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related disclosures. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates and judgments based on historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The Company annually reviews its financial reporting and disclosure practices and accounting policies to ensure that they provide accurate and transparent information relative to the current economic and business environment. The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies the following involve a higher degree of judgment and/or complexity. (See summary of significant accounting policies more fully described on pages 28 through 32.)
Property and equipment
Property and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful lives based on management's estimates of the period over which the assets will generate revenue. The useful lives are estimated based on historical experience with similar assets, taking into account anticipated technological or other changes. The Company periodically reviews these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors and industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of property and equipment or if technological changes were to occur more rapidly than anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets may need to be shortened, resulting in the recognition of increased depreciation and amortization expense in future periods.
Long-lived assets
Long-lived assets (including goodwill) are reviewed for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of the Company's long-lived assets, the Company considers changes in economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. Estimates of future cash flows are judgments based on the Company's experience and knowledge of operations. These estimates can be significantly impacted by many factors including changes in global and local business and economic conditions, operating costs, inflation, competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the Company's estimates or the underlying assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges.
21
Restructuring and litigation accruals
In 2002 and 2001, the Company recorded charges related to restructuring markets, eliminating positions and strategic changes. The accruals recorded included estimates pertaining to employee termination costs and remaining lease obligations for closed facilities. Although the Company does not anticipate significant changes, the actual costs may differ from these estimates.
From time to time, the Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to franchisees, suppliers, employees, customers and competitors. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each matter. The required accrual may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters. The Company does not believe that any such matter will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Income taxes
The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred assets will not be realized. While the Company has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, if these estimates and assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to adjust its valuation allowance. This could result in a charge to, or an increase in, income in the period such determination is made.
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis differences totaling $3.2 billion related to investments in certain foreign subsidiaries or affiliates. The basis differences consist primarily of undistributed earnings considered permanently invested in the businesses. If management's intentions change in the future, deferred taxes may need to be provided.
In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. The Company records accruals for the estimated outcomes of these audits, and the accruals may change in the future due to new developments in each matter.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Asset retirement obligations
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, effective January 1, 2003. The Statement requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at their fair value at the time that the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, the cost will be capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and allocated to expense over the useful life of the asset.
Application of the new rules, which for the Company relates to lease obligations in certain international markets, is expected to result in a cumulative effect of adoption in the first quarter 2003 that will reduce net income and shareholders' equity by approximately $30 million to $40 million. The adoption of the new rules is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's ongoing results of operations or financial position.
Variable interest entities
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN No. 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which requires an enterprise to consolidate or make certain disclosures about variable interest entities that meet certain criteria, effective July 1, 2003. The Company is currently performing an analysis to determine the applicability of FIN No. 46 to SCC. See summary of significant accounting policies on page 31 for further details.
Effects of changing pricesinflation
The Company has demonstrated an ability to manage inflationary cost increases effectively. This is because of rapid inventory turnover, the ability to adjust menu prices, cost controls and substantial property holdingsmany of which are at fixed costs and partly financed by debt made less expensive by inflation. In hyperinflationary markets, menu board prices typically are adjusted to keep pace with inflation, mitigating the effect on reported results.
Forward-looking statements
Certain forward-looking statements are included in this report. They use such words as "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "plan" and other similar terminology. These statements reflect management's current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date of this report. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties. The following are some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or underlying our forward-looking statements: effectiveness of operating initiatives; success in advertising and promotional efforts; changes in global and local business and economic conditions, including their impact on consumer confidence; fluctuations in currency exchange and interest rates; food, labor and other operating costs; political or economic instability in local markets, including the effects of war and terrorist activities; competition, including pricing and marketing initiatives and new product offerings by the Company's competitors; consumer preferences or perceptions concerning the Company's product offerings; spending patterns and demographic trends; availability of qualified restaurant personnel; severe weather conditions; existence of positive or negative publicity regarding the Company or its industry generally; effects of legal claims; cost and deployment of capital; changes in future effective tax rates; changes in governmental regulations; and changes in applicable accounting policies and practices. The foregoing list of important factors is not all inclusive.
The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
22
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included in Part II, Item 7, page 19 of this Form 10-K.
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page reference |
|
---|---|---|
Consolidated statement of income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 | 24 | |
Consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2002 and 2001 | 25 | |
Consolidated statement of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 | 26 | |
Consolidated statement of shareholders' equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 | 27 | |
Notes to consolidated financial statements | 28 | |
Quarterly results (unaudited) | 38 | |
Management's report | 39 | |
Report of independent auditors | 39 |
23
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
Years ended December 31, |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||
REVENUES | |||||||||||
Sales by Company-operated restaurants | $ | 11,499.6 | $ | 11,040.7 | $ | 10,467.0 | |||||
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants | 3,906.1 | 3,829.3 | 3,776.0 | ||||||||
Total revenues | 15,405.7 | 14,870.0 | 14,243.0 | ||||||||
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES | |||||||||||
Company-operated restaurant expenses | |||||||||||
Food & paper | 3,917.4 | 3,802.1 | 3,557.1 | ||||||||
Payroll & employee benefits | 3,078.2 | 2,901.2 | 2,690.2 | ||||||||
Occupancy & other operating expenses | 2,911.0 | 2,750.4 | 2,502.8 | ||||||||
Franchised restaurantsoccupancy expenses | 840.1 | 800.2 | 772.3 | ||||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses | 1,712.8 | 1,661.7 | 1,587.3 | ||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net | 833.3 | 257.4 | (196.4 | ) | |||||||
Total operating costs and expenses | 13,292.8 | 12,173.0 | 10,913.3 | ||||||||
Operating income | 2,112.9 | 2,697.0 | 3,329.7 | ||||||||
Interest expensenet of capitalized interest of $14.3, $15.2 and $16.3 | 374.1 | 452.4 | 429.9 | ||||||||
McDonald's Japan IPO gain | (137.1 | ) | |||||||||
Nonoperating expense, net | 76.7 | 52.0 | 17.5 | ||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change | 1,662.1 | 2,329.7 | 2,882.3 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 670.0 | 693.1 | 905.0 | ||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | 992.1 | 1,636.6 | 1,977.3 | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax benefit of $17.6 | (98.6 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | $ | 893.5 | $ | 1,636.6 | $ | 1,977.3 | |||||
Per common sharebasic: | |||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | .78 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.49 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.08 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | $ | .70 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.49 | |||||
Per common sharediluted: | |||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | .77 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.46 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.07 | ) | |||||||||
Net income | $ | .70 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.46 | |||||
Dividends per common share | $ | .24 | $ | .23 | $ | .22 | |||||
Weighted-average sharesbasic | 1,273.1 | 1,289.7 | 1,323.2 | ||||||||
Weighted-average sharesdiluted | 1,281.5 | 1,309.3 | 1,356.5 | ||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
24
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
December 31, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash and equivalents | $ | 330.4 | $ | 418.1 | ||||
Accounts and notes receivable | 855.3 | 881.9 | ||||||
Inventories, at cost, not in excess of market | 111.7 | 105.5 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 418.0 | 413.8 | ||||||
Total current assets | 1,715.4 | 1,819.3 | ||||||
Other assets | ||||||||
Investments in and advances to affiliates | 1,037.7 | 990.2 | ||||||
Goodwill, net | 1,559.8 | 1,320.4 | ||||||
Miscellaneous | 1,074.2 | 1,115.1 | ||||||
Total other assets | 3,671.7 | 3,425.7 | ||||||
Property and equipment | ||||||||
Property and equipment, at cost | 26,218.6 | 24,106.0 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (7,635.2 | ) | (6,816.5 | ) | ||||
Net property and equipment | 18,583.4 | 17,289.5 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 23,970.5 | $ | 22,534.5 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||
Notes payable | $ | 0.3 | $ | 184.9 | ||||
Accounts payable | 635.8 | 689.5 | ||||||
Income taxes | 16.3 | 20.4 | ||||||
Other taxes | 191.8 | 180.4 | ||||||
Accrued interest | 199.4 | 170.6 | ||||||
Accrued restructuring and restaurant closing costs | 328.5 | 144.2 | ||||||
Accrued payroll and other liabilities | 774.7 | 680.7 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt | 275.5 | 177.6 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 2,422.3 | 2,248.3 | ||||||
Long-term debt | 9,703.6 | 8,555.5 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities and minority interests | 560.0 | 629.3 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 1,003.7 | 1,112.2 | ||||||
Common equity put options and forward contracts | 500.8 | |||||||
Shareholders' equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; authorized165.0 million shares; issuednone | ||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized3.5 billion shares; issued1,660.6 million shares | 16.6 | 16.6 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,747.3 | 1,591.2 | ||||||
Unearned ESOP compensation | (98.4 | ) | (106.7 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings | 19,204.4 | 18,608.3 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (1,601.3 | ) | (1,708.8 | ) | ||||
Common stock in treasury, at cost; 392.4 and 379.9 million shares | (8,987.7 | ) | (8,912.2 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders' equity | 10,280.9 | 9,488.4 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 23,970.5 | $ | 22,534.5 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
25
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
Years ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS |
||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||
Operating activities | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 893.5 | $ | 1,636.6 | $ | 1,977.3 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | 98.6 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,050.8 | 1,086.3 | 1,010.7 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | (44.6 | ) | (87.6 | ) | 60.5 | |||||||
Changes in working capital items | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable | 1.6 | (104.7 | ) | (67.2 | ) | |||||||
Inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets | (38.1 | ) | (62.9 | ) | (29.6 | ) | ||||||
Accounts payable | (11.2 | ) | 10.2 | 89.7 | ||||||||
Taxes and other accrued liabilities | 448.0 | 270.4 | (45.8 | ) | ||||||||
Other (including noncash portion of significant items) | 491.5 | (60.0 | ) | (244.1 | ) | |||||||
Cash provided by operations | 2,890.1 | 2,688.3 | 2,751.5 | |||||||||
Investing activities | ||||||||||||
Property and equipment expenditures | (2,003.8 | ) | (1,906.2 | ) | (1,945.1 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of restaurant businesses | (548.4 | ) | (331.6 | ) | (425.5 | ) | ||||||
Sales of restaurant businesses and property | 369.5 | 375.9 | 302.8 | |||||||||
Other | (283.9 | ) | (206.3 | ) | (144.8 | ) | ||||||
Cash used for investing activities | (2,466.6 | ) | (2,068.2 | ) | (2,212.6 | ) | ||||||
Financing activities | ||||||||||||
Net short-term borrowings (repayments) | (606.8 | ) | (248.0 | ) | 59.1 | |||||||
Long-term financing issuances | 1,502.6 | 1,694.7 | 2,381.3 | |||||||||
Long-term financing repayments | (750.3 | ) | (919.4 | ) | (761.9 | ) | ||||||
Treasury stock purchases | (670.2 | ) | (1,068.1 | ) | (2,023.4 | ) | ||||||
Common stock dividends | (297.4 | ) | (287.7 | ) | (280.7 | ) | ||||||
Other | 310.9 | 204.8 | 88.9 | |||||||||
Cash used for financing activities | (511.2 | ) | (623.7 | ) | (536.7 | ) | ||||||
Cash and equivalents increase (decrease) | (87.7 | ) | (3.6 | ) | 2.2 | |||||||
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year | 418.1 | 421.7 | 419.5 | |||||||||
Cash and equivalents at end of year | $ | 330.4 | $ | 418.1 | $ | 421.7 | ||||||
Supplemental cash flow disclosures | ||||||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 359.7 | $ | 446.9 | $ | 469.7 | ||||||
Income taxes paid | 572.2 | 773.8 | 854.2 | |||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
26
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Common stock issued |
|
|
|
Common stock in treasury |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Unearned ESOP compen- sation |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
Additional paid-in capital |
Retained earnings |
Deferred hedging adjustment |
Foreign currency translation |
Total shareholders' equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Amount |
Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 1999 | 1,660.6 | $ | 16.6 | $ | 1,288.3 | $ | (133.3 | ) | $ | 15,562.8 | $ | | $ | (886.8 | ) | (309.8 | ) | $ | (6,208.5 | ) | $ | 9,639.1 | ||||||||
Net income | 1,977.3 | 1,977.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustments (including taxes of $65.1) | (400.5 | ) | (400.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 1,576.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock cash dividends ($.22 per share) | (280.7 | ) | (280.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESOP loan payment | 20.1 | 20.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | (56.7 | ) | (2,002.2 | ) | (2,002.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common equity put option issuances and expirations, net | 25.5 | 25.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and other (including tax benefits of $80.3) | 153.5 | (1.8 | ) | 10.8 | 74.1 | 225.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2000 | 1,660.6 | 16.6 | 1,441.8 | (115.0 | ) | 17,259.4 | | (1,287.3 | ) | (355.7 | ) | (8,111.1 | ) | 9,204.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income | 1,636.6 | 1,636.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustments (including taxes of $65.7) | (412.2 | ) | (412.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SFAS No. 133 transition adjustment (including tax benefits of $9.2) | (17.0 | ) | (17.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustmentscash flow hedges (including taxes of $1.4) | 7.7 | 7.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 1,215.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock cash dividends ($.23 per share) | (287.7 | ) | (287.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESOP loan payment | 8.0 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | (36.1 | ) | (1,090.2 | ) | (1,090.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common equity put option issuances and expirations, net and forward contracts | 199.2 | 199.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and other (including tax benefits of $70.0) | 149.4 | 0.3 | 11.9 | 89.9 | 239.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 | 1,660.6 | 16.6 | 1,591.2 | (106.7 | ) | 18,608.3 | (9.3 | ) | (1,699.5 | ) | (379.9 | ) | (8,912.2 | ) | 9,488.4 | |||||||||||||||
Net income | 893.5 | 893.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustments (including taxes of $150.5) | 106.7 | 106.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustmentscash flow hedges (including taxes of $3.5) | 0.8 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 1,001.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock cash dividends ($.24 per share) | (297.4 | ) | (297.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESOP loan payment | 7.4 | 7.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock purchases | (25.6 | ) | (686.9 | ) | (686.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common equity put option expirations and forward contracts settled | 500.8 | 500.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and other (including tax benefits of $61.3) | 156.1 | 0.9 | 13.1 | 110.6 | 267.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 | 1,660.6 | $ | 16.6 | $ | 1,747.3 | $ | (98.4 | ) | $ | 19,204.4 | $ | (8.5 | ) | $ | (1,592.8 | ) | (392.4 | ) | $ | (8,987.7 | ) | $ | 10,280.9 | |||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
NATURE OF BUSINESS
The Company operates in the food service industry and primarily operates and franchises quick-service restaurant businesses under the McDonald's brand. The Company also operates other restaurant concepts under its Partner Brands: Boston Market, Chipotle Mexican Grill and Donatos Pizzeria. In addition, McDonald's has a minority ownership in Pret A Manger. In March 2002, the Company sold its Aroma Café business in the U.K.
All restaurants are operated by the Company, or under the terms of franchise arrangements, by franchisees who are independent entrepreneurs or by affiliates operating under joint-venture agreements between the Company and local business people.
CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. Substantially all investments in affiliates owned 50% or less (primarily McDonald's Japan and Pret A Manger) are accounted for by the equity method.
ESTIMATES IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Sales by Company-operated restaurants are recognized on a cash basis. Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants include continuing rent and service fees, initial fees and royalties received from foreign affiliates and developmental licensees. Continuing fees and royalties are recognized in the period earned. Initial fees are recognized upon opening of a restaurant, which is when the Company has performed substantially all initial services required by the franchise arrangement.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The functional currency of substantially all operations outside the U.S. is the respective local currency, except for a small number of countries with hyperinflationary economies, where the functional currency is the U.S. Dollar.
ADVERTISING COSTS
Production costs for radio and television advertising, primarily in the U.S., are expensed when the commercials are initially aired. Advertising expenses included in costs of Company-operated restaurants and in selling, general & administrative expenses were (in millions): 2002$647.6; 2001$600.9; 2000$595.3. In addition, significant advertising expenses are incurred by franchisees through advertising cooperatives in individual markets.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company accounts for stock options as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and discloses pro forma information, as provided by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
Pro forma net income and net income per common share were determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of these options was estimated at the date of grant using an option pricing model. The model was designed to estimate the fair value of exchange-traded options that, unlike employee stock options, can be traded at any time and are fully transferable. In addition, such models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected volatility of the stock price. For pro forma disclosures, the options' estimated fair value was amortized over their vesting period. The following tables present the pro forma disclosures and the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these options.
Pro forma disclosures
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As reportednet income | $ | 893.5 | $ | 1,636.6 | $ | 1,977.3 | ||||
Deduct: Total stock option compensation expense under fair value method, net of related tax effects |
(251.7 | ) | (210.0 | ) | (153.7 | ) | ||||
Pro formanet income | $ | 641.8 | $ | 1,426.6 | $ | 1,823.6 | ||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||||
As reportedbasic | $ | .70 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.49 | ||||
Pro formabasic | $ | .50 | $ | 1.11 | $ | 1.38 | ||||
As reporteddiluted |
$ |
..70 |
$ |
1.25 |
$ |
1.46 |
||||
Pro formadiluted | $ | .50 | $ | 1.10 | $ | 1.36 | ||||
Assumptions
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expected dividend yield | .75 | % | .65 | % | .65 | % | ||||
Expected stock price volatility | 27.5 | % | 25.7 | % | 24.1 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate | 5.25 | % | 5.03 | % | 6.39 | % | ||||
Expected life of options IN YEARS | 7 | 7 | 7 | |||||||
Weighted-average fair value per option granted | $ | 10.88 | $ | 9.93 | $ | 14.08 |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost, with depreciation and amortization provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: buildingsup to 40 years; leasehold improvementsthe lesser of useful lives of assets or lease terms including option periods; and equipmentthree to 12 years.
28
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the net tangible assets of acquired restaurant businesses. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and includes guidance on the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets arising from business combinations. SFAS No. 142, effective January 1, 2002, eliminates the amortization of goodwill (and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives) and instead subjects it to annual impairment tests. Other intangible assets continue to be amortized over their useful lives. Application of the nonamortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 in 2001 and 2000 would have increased net income by approximately $30 million ($0.02 per share) in each year.
The Company's goodwill primarily consists of amounts paid in excess of net tangible assets for (1) purchases of McDonald's restaurants from franchisees, (2) ownership percentage increases in international joint-ventures and (3) acquisitions of other businesses such as Partner Brands. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is generally assigned to the reporting units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. The Company has defined reporting units as each individual country for McDonald's restaurant business as well as each individual Partner Brand.
The annual goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of a reporting unit, generally based on discounted cash flows, with its carrying amount including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is measured as the difference between the fair value of reporting unit goodwill and the carrying amount of goodwill.
The Company performed the initial required goodwill impairment test as of January 1, 2002 and recorded a noncash pretax charge of $116.2 million ($98.6 million after tax or $0.07 per diluted share) for the cumulative effect of this accounting change. The impaired goodwill resulted primarily from businesses in Argentina, Uruguay and other markets in Latin America and the Middle East, where economies have weakened significantly in recent years. In addition, the Company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill in the fourth quarter of 2002, which resulted in no significant charges.
The carrying amount of goodwill totaled $1,559.8 million and $1,320.4 million as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively (U.S.$676.3, $516.7; Europe$353.5, $278.6; Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa (APMEA)$211.0, $171.3; Latin America$97.3, $158.5; Canada$77.5, $51.2; and Partner Brands$144.2, $144.1). The changes in carrying amounts of goodwill from December 31, 2001 to December 31, 2002 were due to (1) the charge of $116.2 million for the cumulative effect of the accounting change, (2) goodwill generated in 2002 as a result of purchases of McDonald's restaurant businesses and (3) foreign currency rate fluctuations.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of annually reviewing McDonald's restaurant assets for potential impairment, assets are initially grouped together at a television market level in the U.S. and at a country level for each of the international markets. For Partner Brands, assets are grouped by each individual brand. If an indicator of impairment (e.g., negative operating cash flows for the most recent trailing twelve-month period) exists for any grouping of assets, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by each restaurant within the asset grouping is compared to its carrying value. If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value as determined by an estimate of discounted future cash flows.
Losses on assets held for disposal are recognized when management has approved and committed to a plan to dispose of the assets, and the assets are available for disposal. Generally, such losses relate to either restaurants that have closed and ceased operations or businesses or restaurants that are available for sale.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company generally borrows on a long-term basis and is exposed to the impact of interest-rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations. The Company uses foreign currency denominated debt and derivative instruments to manage the impact of these changes. The Company does not use derivatives with a level of complexity or with a risk higher than the exposures to be hedged and does not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes.
The counterparties to these agreements consist of a diverse group of financial institutions. The Company continually monitors its positions and the credit ratings of its counterparties, and adjusts positions as appropriate. The Company did not have significant exposure to any individual counterparty at December 31, 2002 and has master agreements that contain netting arrangements. Certain of these agreements also require each party to post collateral if credit ratings fall below, or aggregate exposures exceed, certain contractual limits. During 2002, certain counterparties were required to post collateral as aggregate exposures exceeded certain contractual limits due to increased values. At December 31, 2002, collateral in the amount of $2.2 million was posted by a counterparty while the Company was not required to collateralize any of its obligations.
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. SFAS No. 133 requires companies to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value. SFAS No. 133 also requires companies to designate all derivatives that qualify as hedging instruments
29
as either fair value hedges, cash flow hedges or hedges of net investments in foreign operations. This designation is based upon the exposure being hedged.
The Company recorded a transition adjustment at January 1, 2001 related to cash flow hedges, which reduced accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity by $17.0 million, after tax. This adjustment was primarily related to interest-rate exchange agreements used to lock in long-term borrowing rates. The cumulative effect of adopting SFAS No. 133 at January 1, 2001 was not material to the Company's Consolidated statement of income.
All derivatives, primarily interest-rate exchange agreements and foreign currency exchange agreements, were classified in the Company's Consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2002 as follows: miscellaneous other assets$133.9 million; other long-term liabilities (excluding accrued interest)$39.2 million; and accrued payroll and other liabilities$23.8 million.
Fair value hedges
The Company enters into fair value hedges to reduce the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or a liability, or an identified portion thereof, which is attributable to a particular risk. The types of fair value hedges the Company enters into include: (1) interest-rate exchange agreements to convert a portion of its fixed-rate debt to floating-rate debt and (2) foreign currency exchange agreements for the exchange of various currencies and interest rates. The foreign currency exchange agreements are entered into to hedge the currency risk associated with debt and intercompany loans denominated in foreign currencies, and essentially result in floating-rate assets or liabilities denominated in U.S. Dollars or appropriate functional currencies.
For fair value hedges, the gains or losses on derivatives as well as the offsetting gains or losses on the related hedged items are recognized in current earnings. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, there was no significant impact to the Company's earnings related to the ineffective portion of fair value hedging instruments.
Cash flow hedges
The Company enters into cash flow hedges to mitigate the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows attributable to a particular risk. The types of cash flow hedges the Company enters into include: (1) interest-rate exchange agreements that effectively convert a portion of floating-rate debt to fixed-rate debt and are designed to reduce the impact of interest-rate changes on future interest expense, (2) forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign currency options that are designed to protect against the reduction in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows such as royalties and other payments denominated in foreign currencies, and (3) foreign currency exchange agreements for the exchange of various currencies and interest rates. The foreign currency exchange agreements hedge the currency risk associated with debt and intercompany loans denominated in foreign currencies, and essentially result in fixed-rate assets or liabilities denominated in U.S. Dollars or appropriate functional currencies.
For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gains or losses on derivatives is reported in the deferred hedging adjustment component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in earnings during the period of change. During the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, there was no significant impact to the Company's earnings related to the ineffective portion of cash flow hedging instruments.
The Company recorded net increases to the deferred hedging adjustment component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity of $0.8 million and $7.7 million, after tax, related to cash flow hedges during the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Based on interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates at December 31, 2002, no significant amount of deferred hedging adjustments, after tax, included in accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity at December 31, 2002 will be recognized in earnings in 2003 as the underlying hedged transactions are realized. The maximum maturity date of any cash flow hedge of forecasted transactions at December 31, 2002 was 12 months, excluding instruments hedging forecasted payments of variable interest on existing financial instruments that have various maturity dates through 2011.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations
The Company uses forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign currency denominated debt to hedge its investments in certain foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. Realized and unrealized translation adjustments from these hedges are included in shareholders' equity in the foreign currency translation component of accumulated other comprehensive income and offset translation adjustments on the underlying net assets of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates, which also are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company recorded a net decrease in translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income of $312.0 million after tax (included in the net increase of $106.7 million of translation adjustments in the Consolidated statement of shareholders' equity) related primarily to foreign currency denominated debt designated as hedges of net investments. During the year ended December 31, 2001, the Company recorded a net increase in translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income of $168.5 million after tax related to hedges of net investments.
30
VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN No. 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which requires an enterprise to consolidate or make certain disclosures about variable interest entities that meet certain criteria, effective July 1, 2003. If it is reasonably possible that an enterprise will consolidate or disclose information about a variable interest entity on the effective date, the Interpretation requires certain information to be disclosed as of December 31, 2002.
The Company and six unaffiliated companies that supply the "McDonald's System" (McDonald's franchisees, suppliers and the Company) are equal owners of System Capital Corporation (SCC). The Company is currently performing an analysis to determine the applicability of FIN No. 46 to SCC. SCC's purpose is to provide funding to McDonald's franchisees, suppliers to the McDonald's System and McDonald's Corporation and to build equity within SCC that will benefit the McDonald's System. No employees of SCC are employees of the seven shareholders. SCC competes with other lenders who provide similar financing to McDonald's franchisees and suppliers. SCC's function is similar to that of a cooperative and its primary operating activities include (1) providing loans to qualifying U.S. franchisees to purchase existing restaurant businesses as well as finance equipment, buildings and working capital, (2) purchasing accounts receivable and financing inventory and other needs of eligible suppliers and distributors and (3) acquiring land and leasing it to McDonald's Corporation for new restaurants, primarily in the U.S.
The leases are generally for 20 years, provide for up to 20 additional years in renewal options and include an option for the Company to purchase some or all of the real estate subject to the lease at a price equal to SCC's acquisition cost. The Company's commitments under these leases are included in operating lease commitments on pages 20 and 34 and total approximately $14 million annually based on SCC's current cost of financing.
SCC funds its operations through borrowings by its wholly owned subsidiary, Golden Funding Corp. (Golden Funding). Golden Funding had approximately $1.7 billion of commercial paper and medium-term notes outstanding at December 31, 2002. SCC assets included $900 million of loans to McDonald's franchisees, $500 million of land leased to the Company, and $300 million of loans to McDonald's suppliers.
Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch periodically review Golden Funding, including reviews of key performance indicators and asset quality. These rating agencies currently rate Golden Funding's commercial paper P-1, A-1 and F1 and its long-term debt Aa2, AA and AA, respectively. Credit support for Golden Funding's financing consists of: $14 million of cash reserves held by Golden Funding, $14 million of preferred shares (primarily supplier trade receivables purchased by SCC and contributed to Golden Funding), and a $30 million letter of credit issued jointly by a syndication of banks.
The Company's investment in SCC is accounted for on the cost basis.
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, effective January 1, 2003. The Statement requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at their fair value at the time that the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, the cost will be capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and allocated to expense over the useful life of the asset.
Application of the new rules, which for the Company relates to lease obligations in certain international markets, is expected to result in a cumulative effect of adoption in the first quarter 2003 that will reduce net income and shareholders' equity by approximately $30 million to $40 million. The adoption of the new rules is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's ongoing results of operations or financial position.
COMMON EQUITY PUT OPTIONS AND FORWARD CONTRACTS
During 2001 and 2000, the Company sold 12.2 million and 16.8 million common equity put options, respectively, in connection with its share repurchase program. Premiums received were recorded in shareholders' equity as a reduction of the cost of treasury stock purchased and were $31.8 million in 2001 and $56.0 million in 2000. In 2002, 10.1 million common equity put options were exercised and 2.1 million options expired unexercised, while 21.0 million options were exercised in 2001. The total amount paid to acquire these shares as a result of the options being exercised was $286 million in 2002 and $700 million in 2001. At December 31, 2002, there were no common equity put options outstanding. At December 31, 2001, the $350.0 million total exercise price of outstanding options was classified in common equity put options and forward contracts in the Consolidated balance sheet, and the related offset was recorded in common stock in treasury, net of premiums received.
During 2001, the Company also entered into equity forward contracts in connection with its share repurchase program. At December 31, 2001, the $150.8 million total purchase price of the forward contracts was classified in common equity put options and forward contracts in the Consolidated balance sheet, and the related offset was recorded in common stock in treasury. The forward contracts for 5.5 million shares settled in March 2002, and there were no forward contracts outstanding at December 31, 2002.
SALES OF STOCK BY SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES
As permitted by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 51 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, when a subsidiary or affiliate sells unissued shares in a public offering, the Company records an adjustment to reflect an increase or decrease in the carrying value of its investment and a resulting nonoperating gain or loss.
31
PER COMMON SHARE INFORMATION
Diluted net income per common share is calculated using net income divided by diluted weighted-average shares. Diluted weighted-average shares include weighted-average shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of stock options, calculated using the treasury stock method. The dilutive effect of stock options was (in millions of shares): 20028.4; 200119.6; 200033.3. Stock options that were not included in diluted weighted-average shares because they would have been antidilutive were (in millions of shares): 2002148.0; 200183.1; 200049.2. The dilutive effect of common equity put options and forward contracts in 2001 and 2000 was not significant.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
The Company considers short-term, highly liquid investments to be cash equivalents. The impact of fluctuating foreign currencies on cash and equivalents was not material.
OTHER OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET
IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gains on sales of restaurant businesses | $ | (113.6 | ) | $ | (112.4 | ) | $ | (86.9 | ) | |||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates | (24.1 | ) | (62.7 | ) | (120.9 | ) | ||||||
Team service system payments | 21.6 | |||||||||||
Bad debts and other expense | 96.2 | 54.9 | 11.4 | |||||||||
Significant items: | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges | 266.9 | 200.0 | ||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment | 402.4 | 135.2 | ||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges | 183.9 | 42.4 | ||||||||||
Total significant items | 853.2 | 377.6 | ||||||||||
Other operating (income) expense, net | $ | 833.3 | $ | 257.4 | $ | (196.4 | ) | |||||
TEAM SERVICE SYSTEM PAYMENTS
In 2002, the Company made payments to U.S. owner/operators to facilitate the introduction of a new front counter team service system.
RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
In 2002, the Company recorded $266.9 million of pretax charges ($243.6 million after tax) related to transferring ownership in four countries in the Middle East and Latin America, ceasing operations in three countries in Latin America, eliminating positions (approximately 600 positions, about half of which were in the U.S. and half of which were in international markets) and reallocating resources and consolidating certain home office facilities to control costs.
The 2002 charges consisted of: $136.8 million of asset write-offs and losses on the sale of assets and $64.6 million of costs for leases and other obligations in the markets restructured or exited, $55.9 million of severance and other employee-related costs, $14.7 million of lease cancellation and other costs related to the closing of certain home office facilities; and $9.9 million of payments made to facilitate a change of ownership from U.S. franchisees who have had a history of financial difficulty and consequently were unable to deliver the level of operational excellence needed to succeed in the future. These charges were partially offset by a $15.0 million reversal of accrued restructuring costs recorded in 2001, primarily due to lower employee-related costs than originally estimated.
In 2001, the Company recorded $200.0 million of pretax charges ($136.1 million after tax) related to strategic changes and restaurant initiatives in the U.S. and certain international markets. The changes in the U.S. included streamlining operations by reducing the number of regions and divisions, enabling the Company to combine staff functions. In connection with these initiatives, the Company eliminated approximately 850 positions, consisting of 700 positions in the U.S., primarily in the divisions and regions, and 150 positions in international markets.
The 2001 charges consisted of: $114.4 million of severance and other employee-related costs, $68.8 million of lease cancellation and other costs related to the closing of region and division facilities, and $16.8 million of other cash costs, primarily consisting of payments made to facilitate a change of ownership from U.S. franchisees who have had a history of financial difficulty and consequently were unable to deliver the level of operational excellence needed to succeed in the future.
RESTAURANT CLOSINGS/ASSET IMPAIRMENT
In 2002, the Company recorded $402.4 million of pretax charges ($335.8 million after tax) consisting of: $302.3 million related to management's decision to close 751 underperforming restaurants (234 were closed in 2002 and 517 will close throughout 2003) primarily in the U.S. and Japan, and $100.1 million primarily related to the impairment of assets for certain existing restaurants in Europe and Latin America.
In 2001, the Company recorded $135.2 million of pretax charges ($106.3 million after tax) consisting of: $91.2 million related to the closing of 163 underperforming restaurants in international markets in 2001, a $24.0 million asset impairment charge due to an assessment of the ongoing impact of Turkey's significant currency devaluation on our business, and $20.0 million related to the disposition of Aroma Café in the U.K.
TECHNOLOGY WRITE-OFFS AND OTHER CHARGES
In 2002, the Company recorded $183.9 million of pretax charges ($120.5 million after tax) consisting of: $170.0 million primarily related to the write-off of software development costs as a result of management's decision to terminate a long-term technology project, and $13.9 million primarily related to the write-off of receivables and inventory in Venezuela as a result of the temporary closure of all McDonald's restaurants due to the national strike that began in early December.
In 2001, the Company recorded $42.4 million of pretax charges ($29.1 million after tax) consisting of: $17.4 million primarily related to the write-off of certain technology, and $25.0 million primarily related to the unrecoverable costs incurred in connection with the theft of winning game pieces from the Company's Monopoly and certain other promotional games over an extended period of time, and the related termination of the supplier of the game pieces. Fifty individuals (none of whom were Company employees) were convicted of conspiracy and/or mail fraud charges.
32
The following table presents the activity included in accrued restructuring and restaurant closing costs in the Consolidated balance sheet.
|
2001 activity |
|
2002 activity |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS |
Liability at December 31, 2001 |
Liability at December 31, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision |
Cash |
Noncash |
Provision |
Cash |
Noncash |
|||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset write-offs | $ | 10.0 | $ | (10.0 | ) | | $ | 141.7 | $ | (141.7 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Employee-related costs | 114.4 | $ | (34.6 | ) | $ | 79.8 | 40.9 | $ | (48.4 | ) | $ | 72.3 | ||||||||||||
Lease termination and other | 75.6 | (29.4 | ) | 46.2 | 84.3 | (27.2 | ) | 103.3 | ||||||||||||||||
200.0 | (64.0 | ) | (10.0 | ) | 126.0 | 266.9 | (75.6 | ) | (141.7 | ) | 175.6 | |||||||||||||
Restaurant closings/asset impairment: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset write-offs | 119.0 | (119.0 | ) | | 282.3 | (282.3 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Lease termination and other | 16.2 | (5.1 | ) | 11.1 | 120.1 | (2.8 | ) | 128.4 | ||||||||||||||||
135.2 | (5.1 | ) | (119.0 | ) | 11.1 | 402.4 | (2.8 | ) | (282.3 | ) | 128.4 | |||||||||||||
Technology write-offs and other charges: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset write-offs | 17.4 | (17.4 | ) | | 164.4 | (164.4 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Other | 25.0 | (17.9 | ) | 7.1 | 19.5 | (2.1 | ) | 24.5 | ||||||||||||||||
42.4 | (17.9 | ) | (17.4 | ) | 7.1 | 183.9 | (2.1 | ) | (164.4 | ) | 24.5 | |||||||||||||
Total accrued restructuring and restaurant closing costs | $ | 377.6 | $ | (87.0 | ) | $ | (146.4 | ) | $ | 144.2 | $ | 853.2 | $ | (80.5 | ) | $ | (588.4 | ) | $ | 328.5 | ||||
Employee severance is paid in installments over a period of up to one year after termination, and the remaining lease payments for closed facilities will generally be paid through 2020. No significant adjustments have been made to the original plans approved by management.
McDONALD'S JAPAN INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING (IPO) GAIN
In 2001, McDonald's Japan, the Company's largest market in the APMEA segment, completed an IPO of 12 million shares. The Company owns 50% of McDonald's Japan, while the Company's founding partner Den Fujita and his family own approximately 26%. The Company recorded a $137.1 million gain (pre and after tax) in nonoperating income to reflect an increase in the carrying value of its investment as a result of the cash proceeds from the IPO received by McDonald's Japan.
FRANCHISE ARRANGEMENTS
Individual franchise arrangements generally include a lease and a license and provide for payment of initial fees, as well as continuing rent and service fees to the Company based upon a percent of sales with minimum rent payments. McDonald's franchisees are granted the right to operate a restaurant using the McDonald's system and, in certain cases, the use of a restaurant facility, generally for a period of 20 years. Franchisees pay related occupancy costs including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. In addition, franchisees outside the U.S. generally pay a refundable, noninterest-bearing security deposit. Foreign affiliates and developmental licensees pay a royalty to the Company based upon a percent of sales.
The results of operations of restaurant businesses purchased and sold in transactions with franchisees, affiliates and others were not material to the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to purchase and sale.
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants consisted of:
IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minimum rents | $ | 1,479.9 | $ | 1,477.9 | $ | 1,465.3 | |||
Percent rent and service fees | 2,375.1 | 2,290.2 | 2,247.0 | ||||||
Initial fees | 51.1 | 61.2 | 63.7 | ||||||
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants | $ | 3,906.1 | $ | 3,829.3 | $ | 3,776.0 | |||
Future minimum rent payments due to the Company under existing franchise arrangements are:
IN MILLIONS |
Owned sites |
Leased sites |
Total |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | $ | 989.5 | $ | 745.6 | $ | 1,735.1 | |||
2004 | 972.8 | 734.3 | 1,707.1 | ||||||
2005 | 949.6 | 712.6 | 1,662.2 | ||||||
2006 | 922.6 | 690.4 | 1,613.0 | ||||||
2007 | 891.8 | 674.3 | 1,566.1 | ||||||
Thereafter | 7,367.7 | 5,758.9 | 13,126.6 | ||||||
Total minimum payments | $ | 12,094.0 | $ | 9,316.1 | $ | 21,410.1 | |||
At December 31, 2002, net property and equipment under franchise arrangements totaled $9.5 billion (including land of $2.8 billion) after deducting accumulated depreciation and amortization of $4.0 billion.
INCOME TAXES
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change, classified by source of income, was as follows:
IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | $ | 876.3 | $ | 958.2 | $ | 1,280.6 | |||
Outside the U.S. | 785.8 | 1,371.5 | 1,601.7 | ||||||
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 1,662.1 | $ | 2,329.7 | $ | 2,882.3 | |||
33
The provision for income taxes, classified by the timing and location of payment, was as follows:
IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. federal | $ | 307.0 | $ | 357.3 | $ | 361.1 | |||||
U.S. state | 54.6 | 59.7 | 77.0 | ||||||||
Outside the U.S. | 353.0 | 363.7 | 406.4 | ||||||||
Current tax provision | 714.6 | 780.7 | 844.5 | ||||||||
U.S. federal | (47.4 | ) | 57.7 | 75.2 | |||||||
U.S. state | (7.6 | ) | 4.3 | 9.5 | |||||||
Outside the U.S. | 10.4 | (149.6 | ) | (24.2 | ) | ||||||
Deferred tax provision (benefit)(1) | (44.6 | ) | (87.6 | ) | 60.5 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 670.0 | $ | 693.1 | $ | 905.0 | |||||
Net deferred tax liabilities consisted of:
|
December 31, |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS |
||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
Property and equipment | $ | 1,316.3 | $ | 1,304.4 | ||||
Other | 448.4 | 429.9 | ||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities | 1,764.7 | 1,734.3 | ||||||
Intangible assets | (199.7 | ) | (207.9 | ) | ||||
Operating loss carryforwards | (186.1 | ) | (166.0 | ) | ||||
Employee benefit plans | (129.7 | ) | (137.2 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment | (89.4 | ) | (108.8 | ) | ||||
Capital loss carryforwards | (88.0 | ) | ||||||
Foreign tax credit carryforwards | (45.0 | ) | (21.6 | ) | ||||
Other | (450.9 | ) | (258.4 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax assets before valuation allowance | (1,188.8 | ) | (899.9 | ) | ||||
Valuation allowance | 322.1 | 180.1 | ||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities(1) | $ | 898.0 | $ | 1,014.5 | ||||
The statutory U.S. federal income tax rate reconciles to the effective income tax rates as follows:
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | |
State income taxes, net of related federal income tax benefit | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 | ||||
Benefits and taxes related to foreign operations(1) | (6.3 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (4.8 | ) | |
Significant items(2) | 8.7 | (1.6 | ) | ||||
Other, net | .7 | .8 | (.7 | ) | |||
Effective income tax rates | 40.3 | % | 29.8 | % | 31.4 | % | |
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis differences related to investments in certain foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. These basis differences were approximately $3.2 billion at December 31, 2002 and consisted primarily of undistributed earnings considered permanently invested in the businesses. Determination of the deferred income tax liability on these unremitted earnings is not practicable because such liability, if any, is dependent on circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs.
LEASING ARRANGEMENTS
At December 31, 2002, the Company was lessee at 6,871 restaurant locations through ground leases (the Company leases the land and the Company or franchisee owns the building) and at 7,823 restaurant locations through improved leases (the Company leases land and buildings). Lease terms for most restaurants are generally for 20 to 25 years and, in many cases, provide for rent escalations and renewal options, with certain leases providing purchase options. For most locations, the Company is obligated for the related occupancy costs including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. In addition, the Company is lessee under noncancelable leases covering certain offices and vehicles.
Future minimum payments required under existing operating leases with initial terms of one year or more are:
IN MILLIONS |
Restaurant |
Other |
Total |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | $ | 829.6 | $ | 83.3 | $ | 912.9 | |||
2004 | 798.1 | 50.2 | 848.3 | ||||||
2005 | 746.1 | 42.4 | 788.5 | ||||||
2006 | 698.8 | 36.5 | 735.3 | ||||||
2007 | 652.3 | 30.5 | 682.8 | ||||||
Thereafter | 5,893.6 | 165.1 | 6,058.7 | ||||||
Total minimum payments | $ | 9,618.5 | $ | 408.0 | $ | 10,026.5 | |||
Rent expense was (in millions): 2002$1,032.5; 2001$958.6; 2000$886.4. These amounts included percent rents in excess of minimum rents (in millions): 2002$131.3; 2001$119.6; 2000$133.0.
SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company operates in the food service industry. Substantially all revenues result from the sale of menu products at restaurants operated by the Company, franchisees or affiliates. All intercompany revenues and expenses are eliminated in computing revenues and operating income. Operating income includes the Company's share of operating results of affiliates after interest expense and income taxes, except for U.S. affiliates, which are reported before income taxes. Royalties and other payments received from subsidiaries outside the U.S. were (in millions): 2002$644.1; 2001$607.7; 2000$603.6.
Corporate general & administrative expenses are included in the corporate segment of operating income and consist of home office support costs in areas such as facilities, finance, human resources, information technology, legal, supply chain management and training. Corporate assets include corporate cash and equivalents, asset portions of financing instruments, home office facilities and deferred tax assets.
34
IN MILLIONS |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. | $ | 5,422.7 | $ | 5,395.6 | $ | 5,259.1 | ||||
Europe | 5,136.0 | 4,751.8 | 4,753.9 | |||||||
APMEA | 2,367.7 | 2,203.3 | 2,101.8 | |||||||
Latin America | 813.9 | 971.3 | 949.3 | |||||||
Canada | 633.6 | 608.1 | 615.1 | |||||||
Partner Brands | 1,031.8 | 939.9 | 563.8 | |||||||
Total revenues | $ | 15,405.7 | $ | 14,870.0 | $ | 14,243.0 | ||||
U.S. | $ | 1,673.3 | $ | 1,622.5 | $ | 1,795.7 | ||||
Europe | 1,021.8 | 1,063.2 | 1,180.1 | |||||||
APMEA | 64.3 | 325.0 | 451.2 | |||||||
Latin America | (133.4 | ) | 10.9 | 102.3 | ||||||
Canada | 125.4 | 123.7 | 126.3 | |||||||
Partner Brands | (66.8 | ) | (66.5 | ) | (41.5 | ) | ||||
Corporate | (571.7 | ) | (381.8 | ) | (284.4 | ) | ||||
Total operating income | $ | 2,112.9 | (1) | $ | 2,697.0 | (2) | $ | 3,329.7 | ||
U.S. | $ | 8,687.4 | $ | 8,288.4 | $ | 7,856.9 | ||||
Europe | 8,310.6 | 7,139.1 | 7,083.7 | |||||||
APMEA | 3,332.0 | 3,144.5 | 2,983.4 | |||||||
Latin America | 1,425.3 | 1,898.3 | 1,855.6 | |||||||
Canada | 703.2 | 574.2 | 552.0 | |||||||
Partner Brands | 780.4 | 637.1 | 450.7 | |||||||
Corporate | 731.6 | 852.9 | 901.2 | |||||||
Total assets | $ | 23,970.5 | $ | 22,534.5 | $ | 21,683.5 | ||||
U.S. | $ | 752.7 | $ | 552.3 | $ | 475.6 | ||||
Europe | 579.4 | 635.8 | 797.6 | |||||||
APMEA | 230.4 | 275.7 | 253.5 | |||||||
Latin America | 119.9 | 197.5 | 245.7 | |||||||
Canada | 111.6 | 80.4 | 52.5 | |||||||
Partner Brands | 190.4 | 153.3 | 79.6 | |||||||
Corporate | 19.4 | 11.2 | 40.6 | |||||||
Total capital expenditures | $ | 2,003.8 | $ | 1,906.2 | $ | 1,945.1 | ||||
U.S. | $ | 383.4 | $ | 425.0 | $ | 402.6 | ||||
Europe | 334.9 | 313.7 | 296.5 | |||||||
APMEA | 141.7 | 133.2 | 129.8 | |||||||
Latin America | 59.6 | 79.3 | 69.4 | |||||||
Canada | 35.6 | 32.9 | 34.9 | |||||||
Partner Brands | 40.3 | 36.8 | 16.6 | |||||||
Corporate | 55.3 | 65.4 | 60.9 | |||||||
Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 1,050.8 | $ | 1,086.3 | $ | 1,010.7 | ||||
Total long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, were (in millions)Consolidated: 2002$21,976.6; 2001$20,355.3; 2000$19,798.3. U.S. based: 2002$9,254.3; 2001$8,670.4; 2000$8,373.2.
DEBT FINANCING
LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENTS
At December 31, 2002, the Company had several line of credit agreements with various banks totaling $1.3 billion, all of which remained unused at year-end 2002. Subsequent to year end, the Company renegotiated the line of credit agreements as follows: $810.0 million of lines expiring in 2004 with a term of 364 days and fees based on current credit ratings of ..05% per annum on the total commitment, with a feature that allows the Company to convert the borrowings to a one-year loan at expiration; a $500.0 million line expiring in 2008 with fees based on current credit ratings of .07% per annum on the total commitment; and a $25.0 million line expiring in 2003 with a term of 364 days and fees of .07% per annum on the total commitment. Fees and interest rates on these lines are based on the Company's long-term credit rating assigned by Moody's and Standard & Poor's. Under terms of these agreements, the Company is required to maintain a minimum net worth (defined as consolidated assets less consolidated liabilities) of $5 billion. In addition, certain subsidiaries outside the U.S. had unused lines of credit totaling $1.1 billion at December 31, 2002; these were principally short-term and denominated in various currencies at local market rates of interest.
The weighted-average interest rate of short-term borrowings, consisting of commercial paper and foreign currency bank line borrowings, was 3.4% at both December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001.
FAIR VALUES
At December 31, 2002, the fair value of the Company's debt and notes payable obligations was estimated at $10.5 billion compared to a carrying amount of $10.0 billion. This fair value was estimated using various pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses that incorporated quoted market prices. The Company has no current plans to retire a significant amount of its debt prior to maturity.
The carrying amounts for both cash and equivalents and notes receivable approximate fair value. Foreign currency and interest-rate exchange agreements, foreign currency options and forward foreign exchange contracts were recorded in the Consolidated balance sheet at fair value using various pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses that incorporated quoted market prices. No fair value was estimated for noninterest-bearing security deposits by franchisees, because these deposits are an integral part of the overall franchise arrangements.
ESOP LOANS AND OTHER GUARANTEES
At December 31, 2002, the Company has guaranteed and included in total debt $22.6 million of Notes issued by the Leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) with payments through 2006. Borrowings related to the ESOP at December 31, 2002, which include $85.9 million of loans from the Company to the ESOP and the $22.6 million of Notes guaranteed by the Company, are reflected as long-term debt with a corresponding reduction of shareholders' equity (unearned ESOP compensation). The ESOP is repaying the loans and interest through 2018 using Company contributions and dividends from its McDonald's common stock holdings. As the principal amount of the borrowings is repaid, the debt and the unearned ESOP compensation are being reduced.
35
The Company also has guaranteed certain affiliate and other loans totaling $102.0 million at December 31, 2002. These guarantees are contingent commitments issued by the Company generally to support borrowing arrangements of certain U.S. partnerships and franchisees, and certain affiliates. The terms of the guarantees vary and are equal to the remaining term of the related debt. At December 31, 2002, there was no carrying value for obligations under these guarantees in the Company's Consolidated balance sheet.
DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The Company has incurred debt obligations principally through public and private offerings and bank loans. There are no provisions in the Company's debt obligations that would accelerate repayment of debt as a result of a change in credit ratings. Certain of the Company's debt obligations contain cross-acceleration provisions and restrictions on Company and subsidiary mortgages and the long-term debt of certain subsidiaries. Under certain agreements, the Company has the option to retire debt prior to maturity, either at par or at a premium over par.
The following table summarizes the Company's debt obligations (the interest rates reflected in the table include the effects of interest-rate and foreign currency exchange agreements).
|
|
Interest rates(1) December 31 |
Amounts outstanding December 31 |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS |
Maturity dates |
|||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||
Fixed-original issue(2) | 5.2 | % | 6.2 | % | $ | 3,659.4 | $ | 3,293.8 | ||||||
Fixed-converted via exchange agreements(3) | 5.2 | 5.3 | (995.4 | ) | (1,829.9 | ) | ||||||||
Floating | 1.3 | 2.3 | 793.1 | 2,364.8 | ||||||||||
Total U.S. Dollars | 2003-2033 | 3,457.1 | 3,828.7 | |||||||||||
Fixed | 5.5 | 5.7 | 677.8 | 629.7 | ||||||||||
Floating | 3.1 | 3.5 | 1,954.7 | 1,724.9 | ||||||||||
Total Euro | 2003-2012 | 2,632.5 | 2,354.6 | |||||||||||
Fixed | 6.2 | 6.1 | 1,152.6 | 698.8 | ||||||||||
Floating | 5.5 | 5.6 | 186.1 | 150.3 | ||||||||||
Total British Pounds Sterling | 2003-2032 | 1,338.7 | 849.1 | |||||||||||
Fixed | 6.2 | 4.5 | 156.0 | 276.9 | ||||||||||
Floating | 1.9 | 6.2 | 237.3 | 58.9 | ||||||||||
Total other European currencies(4) | 2003-2007 | 393.3 | 335.8 | |||||||||||
Fixed | 1.9 | 2.3 | 900.4 | 584.0 | ||||||||||
Floating | 0.1 | 227.9 | ||||||||||||
Total Japanese Yen | 2003-2030 | 900.4 | 811.9 | |||||||||||
Fixed | 7.2 | 7.1 | 455.8 | 317.6 | ||||||||||
Floating | 4.8 | 6.2 | 415.7 | 300.0 | ||||||||||
Total other Asia/Pacific currencies(5) | 2003-2008 | 871.5 | 617.6 | |||||||||||
Fixed | 4.8 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||
Floating | 3.2 | 15.5 | 17.9 | 23.2 | ||||||||||
Total other currencies | 2003-2016 | 21.1 | 26.4 | |||||||||||
Debt obligations before fair value adjustments(6) | 9,614.6 | 8,824.1 | ||||||||||||
Fair value adjustments(7) | 364.8 | 93.9 | ||||||||||||
Total debt obligations(8) | $ | 9,979.4 | $ | 8,918.0 | ||||||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Net property and equipment consisted of:
|
December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
||||||
Land | $ | 4,169.6 | $ | 3,975.6 | |||
Buildings and improvements on owned land | 8,747.2 | 8,127.0 | |||||
Buildings and improvements on leased land | 8,872.5 | 8,020.2 | |||||
Equipment, signs and seating | 3,765.1 | 3,371.7 | |||||
Other | 664.2 | 611.5 | |||||
26,218.6 | 24,106.0 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (7,635.2 | ) | (6,816.5 | ) | |||
Net property and equipment | $ | 18,583.4 | $ | 17,289.5 | |||
Depreciation and amortization expense was (in millions): 2002$971.1; 2001$945.6; 2000$900.9.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company's Profit Sharing and Savings Plan for U.S.-based employees includes profit sharing, 401(k) and leveraged employee stock ownership (ESOP) features. The 401(k) feature allows participants to make pretax contributions that are partly matched from shares released under the ESOP. McDonald's executives, staff and restaurant managers participate in additional ESOP allocations and profit sharing contributions, based on their compensation. The profit sharing contribution is discretionary, and the Company determines the amount each year.
36
Participant 401(k) contributions, the Company's matching contributions, profit sharing contributions and any related earnings can be invested in McDonald's common stock or among several other investment alternatives. ESOP allocations are generally invested in McDonald's common stock.
In addition, the Company maintains a nonqualified, unfunded Supplemental Plan that allows participants to make tax-deferred contributions and receive Company-provided allocations that cannot be made under the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan because of Internal Revenue Service limitations. The investment alternatives and returns in the Supplemental Plan are based on certain of the investment alternatives under the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. Total liabilities under the Supplemental Plan were $297.3 million at December 31, 2002 and $301.1 million at December 31, 2001 and were included in other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated balance sheet.
The Company has entered into derivative contracts to hedge changes in the Supplemental Plan liabilities. At December 31, 2002, derivatives with a fair value of $34.5 million indexed to the Company's stock and $38.4 million indexed to certain market indices were included in miscellaneous other assets in the Consolidated balance sheet. All changes in Plan liabilities and in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded in selling, general & administrative expenses. Changes in fair value of the derivatives indexed to the Company's stock are recorded in the Consolidated statement of income because the contracts provide the counterparty with a choice of cash settlement or settlement in shares.
Total U.S. costs for the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, including nonqualified benefits and related hedging activities, were (in millions): 2002$50.1; 2001$54.6; 2000$49.6.
Certain subsidiaries outside the U.S. also offer profit sharing, stock purchase or other similar benefit plans. Total plan costs outside the U.S. were (in millions): 2002$36.8; 2001$39.7; 2000$38.1.
Other postretirement benefits and postemployment benefits, excluding severance benefits related to the 2002 and 2001 restructuring charges, were immaterial.
STOCK OPTIONS
At December 31, 2002, the Company had five stock-based compensation plans for employees and nonemployee directors. Options to purchase common stock are granted at the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Therefore, no compensation cost has been recognized in the Consolidated statement of income for these plans.
Substantially all of the options become exercisable in four equal installments, beginning a year from the date of the grant, and expire 10 years from the grant date. In 2001, the Board of Directors approved a three-year extension to the term of 44.2 million options granted between May 1, 1999 and December 31, 2000 with an exercise price greater than $28.90. Because the market value of the stock was less than the exercise price of the options at the time of extension, no compensation expense was required to be recorded.
Also in 2001, the Board of Directors approved a special grant of 11.9 million options at a price of $28.90 as an incentive to meet an operating income performance goal for calendar year 2003. The options vest on January 31, 2004, and if the performance goal is met, the options will retain their original 10-year term; otherwise, they will expire on June 30, 2004. The Company does not expect to meet this performance goal.
At December 31, 2002, the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plans was 231.9 million, including 33.0 million available for future grants. A summary of the status of the Company's plans as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and changes during the years then ended, is presented in the following table.
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Options |
Shares IN MILLIONS |
Weighted- average exercise price |
Shares IN MILLIONS |
Weighted- average exercise price |
Shares IN MILLIONS |
Weighted- average exercise price |
|||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year | 192.9 | $ | 26.65 | 175.8 | $ | 25.34 | 164.7 | $ | 23.06 | ||||||
Granted(1) | 26.3 | 28.26 | 38.6 | 29.37 | 26.5 | 35.16 | |||||||||
Exercised | (13.1 | ) | 14.91 | (11.9 | ) | 13.70 | (10.8 | ) | 13.68 | ||||||
Forfeited | (7.2 | ) | 29.22 | (9.6 | ) | 29.03 | (4.6 | ) | 27.81 | ||||||
Outstanding at end of year | 198.9 | $ | 27.57 | 192.9 | $ | 26.65 | 175.8 | $ | 25.34 | ||||||
Exercisable at end of year | 110.9 | 98.2 | 79.3 | ||||||||||||
Options granted each year were 2.1%, 3.0% and 2.0% of weighted-average common shares outstanding for 2002, 2001 and 2000, representing grants to approximately 13,900, 15,100, and 14,100 employees in those three years.
The following table presents information related to options outstanding and options exercisable at December 31, 2002, based on ranges of exercise prices.
December 31, 2002 |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Options outstanding |
Options exercisable |
||||||||||
Range of exercise prices |
Number of options IN MILLIONS |
Weighted- average remaining contractual life IN YEARS |
Weighted- average exercise price |
Number of options IN MILLIONS |
Weighted- average exercise price |
||||||||
$ | 12 to 22 | 31.9 | 1.9 | $ | 15.46 | 30.6 | $ | 15.30 | |||||
23 to 27 | 62.8 | 4.5 | 24.94 | 42.3 | 24.75 | ||||||||
28 to 34 | 59.5 | 7.4 | 29.11 | 8.1 | 29.59 | ||||||||
35 to 46 | 44.7 | 9.6 | 37.85 | 29.9 | 38.28 | ||||||||
$ | 12 to 46 | 198.9 | 6.1 | $ | 27.57 | 110.9 | $ | 26.14 | |||||
37
QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
|
Quarters ended December 31 |
Quarters ended September 30 |
Quarters ended June 30 |
Quarters ended March 31 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales by Company-operated restaurants | $ | 2,932.8 | $ | 2,811.4 | $ | 3,019.3 | $ | 2,876.9 | $ | 2,869.0 | $ | 2,738.2 | $ | 2,678.5 | $ | 2,614.2 | |||||||||
Revenues from franchised and affiliated restaurants | 966.4 | 960.1 | 1,027.7 | 1,002.4 | 993.1 | 969.3 | 918.9 | 897.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues | 3,899.2 | 3,771.5 | 4,047.0 | 3,879.3 | 3,862.1 | 3,707.5 | 3,597.4 | 3,511.7 | |||||||||||||||||
Company-operated margin | 374.5 | 383.5 | 434.5 | 436.1 | 415.1 | 396.6 | 368.9 | 370.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Franchised margin | 749.2 | 758.1 | 813.5 | 799.0 | 787.1 | 771.4 | 716.2 | 700.6 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) | (203.4 | )(1) | 482.7 | (2) | 829.8 | 746.6 | (3) | 845.2 | 772.5 | (4) | 641.3 | (5) | 695.2 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | (343.8 | )(1) | $ | 271.9 | (2) | $ | 486.7 | $ | 545.5 | (6) | $ | 497.5 | $ | 440.9 | (4) | $ | 351.7 | (5) | $ | 378.3 | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | (98.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (343.8 | )(1) | $ | 271.9 | (2) | $ | 486.7 | $ | 545.5 | (6) | $ | 497.5 | $ | 440.9 | (4) | $ | 253.1 | (5) | $ | 378.3 | ||||
Per common sharebasic: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | (.27 | )(1) | $ | .21 | (2) | $ | .38 | $ | .42 | (6) | $ | .39 | $ | .34 | (4) | $ | .28 | (5) | $ | .29 | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.08 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (.27 | )(1) | $ | .21 | (2) | $ | .38 | $ | .42 | (6) | $ | .39 | $ | .34 | (4) | $ | .20 | (5) | $ | .29 | ||||
Per common sharediluted: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | (.27 | )(1) | $ | .21 | (2) | $ | .38 | $ | .42 | (6) | $ | .39 | $ | .34 | (4) | $ | .27 | (5) | $ | .29 | ||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | (.07 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (.27 | )(1) | $ | .21 | (2) | $ | .38 | $ | .42 | (6) | $ | .39 | $ | .34 | (4) | $ | .20 | (5) | $ | .29 | ||||
Dividends per common share | $ | .235 | $ | .225 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Weighted-average sharesbasic | 1,268.8 | 1,282.7 | 1,273.1 | 1,286.1 | 1,273.2 | 1,289.7 | 1,277.2 | 1,300.7 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average sharesdiluted | 1,268.8 | 1,299.3 | 1,280.5 | 1,305.8 | 1,290.6 | 1,311.1 | 1,292.7 | 1,325.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Systemwide sales(7) | $ | 10,489.5 | $ | 10,112.7 | $ | 10,908.1 | $ | 10,629.2 | $ | 10,429.9 | $ | 10,238.8 | $ | 9,698.5 | $ | 9,649.7 | |||||||||
Market price per common share | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
High | $ | 19.95 | $ | 30.10 | $ | 28.62 | $ | 31.00 | $ | 30.72 | $ | 30.96 | $ | 29.06 | $ | 35.06 | |||||||||
Low | 15.17 | 25.00 | 17.42 | 26.00 | 27.00 | 25.39 | 25.38 | 24.75 | |||||||||||||||||
Close | 16.08 | 26.47 | 17.66 | 27.14 | 28.45 | 27.06 | 27.75 | 26.55 | |||||||||||||||||
38
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT
Management is responsible for the preparation, integrity and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements. The financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and include certain amounts based on management's judgment and best estimates. Other financial information presented is consistent with the financial statements.
The Company maintains a system of internal controls over financial reporting including safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition, which is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company's management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation of reliable published financial statements and asset safeguarding. The system includes a documented organizational structure and appropriate division of responsibilities; established policies and procedures that are communicated throughout the Company; careful selection, training, and development of our people; and utilization of an internal audit program. Policies and procedures prescribe that the Company and all employees are to maintain high standards of proper business practices throughout the world.
There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and safeguarding of assets. Furthermore, the effectiveness of an internal control system can change with circumstances. The Company believes that it maintains an effective system of internal control over financial reporting and safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, who were given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data. The audit report of Ernst & Young LLP is presented herein.
The Board of Directors, operating through its Audit Committee composed entirely of independent Directors, provides oversight to the financial reporting process. Ernst & Young LLP has unrestricted access to the Audit Committee and regularly meets with the Committee to discuss accounting, auditing and financial reporting matters.
McDONALD'S
CORPORATION
January 23, 2003
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
McDonald's Corporation
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated balance sheets of McDonald's Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related Consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of McDonald's Corporation management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the U.S. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of McDonald's Corporation at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S.
As discussed in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed its method for accounting for goodwill to conform with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Effective January 1, 2001, the Company changed its method for accounting for derivative financial instruments to conform with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
ERNST &
YOUNG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
January 23, 2003
39
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information regarding directors is incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
Information regarding all of the Company's executive officers is included in Part I, Item 4, page 5 of this Form 10-K.
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Incorporated herein by reference from the Company's definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2002.
Part IV
Item 14. CONTROL AND PROCEDURES
Within the 90-day period prior to the filing of this report, an evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Such officers also confirm that there have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referred to above.
Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
Consolidated financial statements filed as part of this report are listed under Part II, Item 8, pages 24 through 27 of this Form 10-K.
No schedules are required because either the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
The following reports on Form 8-K were filed for the last quarter covered by this report, and subsequently up to March 12, 2003.
Date of report |
Item number |
Financial statements required to be filed |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
12/05/2002 | Item 5 and 7 | No | ||
12/17/2002 | Item 5 and 7 | No | ||
1/23/2003 | Item 5 and 7 | No | ||
2/12/2003 | Item 9 | No |
The exhibits listed in the accompanying index are filed as part of this report.
40
McDonald's Corporation exhibit index (Item 15)
Exhibit Number/Description |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(3) |
(a) |
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, effective as of March 24, 1998, incorporated herein by reference from Form 8-K, dated April 17, 1998. |
||||
(b) |
By-Laws, effective as of July 11, 2002, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. |
|||||
(4) |
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including Indentures:** |
|||||
(a) |
Senior Debt Securities Indenture, dated as of October 19, 1996, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(a) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 333-14141). |
|||||
(i) |
6-3/8% Debentures due January 8, 2028. Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of January 8, 1998, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(a) of Form 8-K, dated January 5, 1998. |
|||||
(ii) |
Medium-Term Notes, Series F, due from 1 Year to 60 Years from the Date of Issue. Supplemental Indenture No. 4, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(c) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 333-59145), dated July 15, 1998. |
|||||
(iii) |
Medium-Term Notes, Series G, due from 1 Year to 60 Years from Date of Issue. Supplemental Indenture No. 6, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(c) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 333-60170), dated May 3, 2001. |
|||||
(iv) |
Medium-Term Notes, Series H, due from 1 Year to 60 Years from Date of Issue. Supplemental Indenture No. 7, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(c) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 333-92212), dated July 10, 2002. |
|||||
(b) |
Subordinated Debt Securities Indenture, dated as of October 18, 1996, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(a) of Form 8-K, dated October 18, 1996. |
|||||
(i) |
7.31% Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2027. Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated September 24, 1997, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(b) of Form 8-K, dated September 19, 1997. |
|||||
(c) |
Debt Securities. Indenture, dated as of March 1, 1987, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(a) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 33-12364). |
|||||
(i) |
8-7/8% Debentures, due 2011. Supplemental Indenture No. 17, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4) of Form 8-K, dated April 22, 1991. |
|||||
(ii) |
Medium-Term Notes, Series D, due from nine months (U.S. Issue)/184 days (Euro Issue) to 60 years from Date of Issue. Supplemental Indenture No. 18, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(b) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 33-42642), dated September 10, 1991. |
|||||
(iii) |
7-3/8% Debentures, due July 15, 2033. Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 21, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(a) of Form 8-K, dated July 15, 1993. |
|||||
(iv) |
Medium-Term Notes, Series E, due from nine months (U.S. Issue)/ 184 days (Euro Issue) to 60 years from the Date of Issue. Supplemental Indenture No. 22, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(b) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 33-60939), dated July 13, 1995. |
|||||
(v) |
7.05% Debentures, due 2025. Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 24, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(a) of Form 8-K, dated November 13, 1995. |
|||||
(d) |
McDonald's Corporation 2002 QSC Rewards Program, effective as of February 13, 2002, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4) of Form S-3A Registration Statement (File No. 333-82920), dated March 14, 2002. |
|||||
(i) |
Prospectus dated March 15, 2002, incorporated by reference from Form 424(b)(4) (File No. 333-82920), filed March 20, 2002. |
|||||
(ii) |
Prospectus Supplement (to Prospectus dated March 15, 2002) dated March 4, 2003, incorporated by reference from Form 424(b)(3) (File No. 333-82920). |
|||||
41
(10) |
Material Contracts |
|||||
(a) |
Directors' Stock Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.* |
|||||
(b) |
Profit Sharing Program, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 1999.* |
|||||
(i) |
First Amendment to the McDonald's Profit Sharing Program, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.* |
|||||
(ii) |
Second Amendment to the McDonald's Profit Sharing Program, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.* |
|||||
(iii) |
Third Amendment to the McDonald's Profit Sharing Program, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.* |
|||||
(iv) |
Fourth Amendment to the McDonald's Profit Sharing Program, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.* |
|||||
(c) |
McDonald's Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.* |
|||||
(i) |
First Amendment to McDonald's Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, filed herewith.* |
|||||
(d) |
1975 Stock Ownership Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.* |
|||||
(e) |
1992 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.* |
|||||
(f) |
1999 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.* |
|||||
(g) |
Executive Retention Plan, as amended and restated December 18, 2002, filed herewith.* |
|||||
(h) |
Senior Director Letter Agreement between Gordon C. Gray and the Company, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. |
|||||
(i) |
Senior Director Letter Agreement between Donald R. Keough and the Company, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. |
|||||
(j) |
McDonald's Corporation 2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.* |
|||||
(k) |
Form of McDonald's Corporation Tier I Change of Control Employment Agreement authorized by the Board of Directors and expected to be entered into between the Company and certain key executives, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.* |
|||||
(12) |
Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
|||||
(21) |
Subsidiaries of the registrant |
|||||
(23) |
Consent of independent auditors |
|||||
(99.1) |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
|||||
(99.2) |
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
42
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
McDonald's Corporation (Registrant) |
||||||
/s/ Matthew H. Paull |
||||||
By | Matthew H. Paull Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|||||
March 12, 2003 Date |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in their capacities indicated below on the 12th day of March, 2003:
Signature, Title
/s/ Hall Adams, Jr. |
/s/ Andrew J. McKenna |
|||||
By | Hall Adams, Jr. Director |
By | Andrew J. McKenna Director |
|||
/s/ Charles H. Bell |
/s/ Matthew H. Paull |
|||||
By | Charles H. Bell President and Chief Operating Officer and Director |
By | Matthew H. Paull Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|||
/s/ Edward A. Brennan |
/s/ David M. Pojman |
|||||
By | Edward A. Brennan Director |
By | David M. Pojman Corporate Senior Vice PresidentController |
|||
/s/ James R. Cantalupo |
/s/ Terry L. Savage |
|||||
By | James R. Cantalupo Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Director |
By | Terry L. Savage Director |
|||
/s/ Enrique Hernandez, Jr. |
/s/ Roger W. Stone |
|||||
By | Enrique Hernandez, Jr. Director |
By | Roger W. Stone Director |
|||
/s/ Jeanne P. Jackson |
/s/ Robert N. Thurston |
|||||
By | Jeanne P. Jackson Director |
By | Robert N. Thurston Director |
|||
/s/ Donald G. Lubin |
/s/ Fred L. Turner |
|||||
By | Donald G. Lubin Director |
By | Fred L. Turner Senior Chairman and Director |
|||
/s/ Walter E. Massey |
||||||
By | Walter E. Massey Director |
43
I, James R. Cantalupo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of McDonald's Corporation, certify that:
Date: March 12, 2003
/s/ James R. Cantalupo |
||||
By | James R. Cantalupo Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
44
Certifications (continued)
I, Matthew H. Paull, Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of McDonald's Corporation, certify that:
Date: March 12, 2003
/s/ Matthew H. Paull |
||||
By | Matthew H. Paull Corporate Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
45