UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 |
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 333-88242
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
34-1959351 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S. Employer | |
240 Main Street, |
80422 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (303) 582-1117
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class |
Outstanding as of May 9, 2003 | |
Common Stock, $.01 par value |
1,500 shares |
Index
March 31, 2003
Page No. | ||||
PART I. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|||
Item 1. |
Consolidated Financial Statements: |
|||
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 |
1 | |||
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 |
2 | |||
Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2003 |
3 | |||
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 |
4 | |||
5-15 | ||||
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
16-29 | ||
Item 3. |
30 | |||
Item 4. |
30 | |||
PART II. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
|||
Item 1. |
31 | |||
Item 2. |
32 | |||
Item 3. |
32 | |||
Item 4. |
32 | |||
Item 5. |
32 | |||
Item 6. |
32 | |||
33 | ||||
34-35 |
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002
(Dollars In Thousands)
March 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
16,947 |
|
$ |
21,358 |
| ||
Restricted cash |
|
2,578 |
|
|
1,395 |
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
1,473 |
|
|
1,456 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
1,404 |
|
|
1,287 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses |
|
2,803 |
|
|
1,907 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
25,205 |
|
|
27,403 |
| ||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
||||||||
Land and improvements |
|
49,739 |
|
|
49,326 |
| ||
Building and improvements |
|
106,911 |
|
|
106,163 |
| ||
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
|
26,424 |
|
|
26,081 |
| ||
Leasehold improvements |
|
961 |
|
|
961 |
| ||
|
184,035 |
|
|
182,531 |
| |||
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION |
|
(20,789 |
) |
|
(19,081 |
) | ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
163,246 |
|
|
163,450 |
| ||
OTHER ASSETS: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
|
26,773 |
|
|
26,838 |
| ||
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
7,379 |
|
|
7,522 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
12,861 |
|
|
11,013 |
| ||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ |
235,464 |
|
$ |
236,226 |
| ||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ |
17,461 |
|
$ |
22,055 |
| ||
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
2,149 |
|
|
2,296 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
19,610 |
|
|
24,351 |
| ||
Long term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
130,152 |
|
|
138,113 |
| ||
Long term debtrelated parties |
|
19,489 |
|
|
9,000 |
| ||
Total long-term debt |
|
149,641 |
|
|
147,113 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
169,251 |
|
|
171,464 |
| ||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Common stock $.01 par value; 1,500 shares authorized; issued and outstanding |
||||||||
Additional paid in capital |
|
27,992 |
|
|
27,992 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
38,221 |
|
|
36,770 |
| ||
Total stockholders equity |
|
66,213 |
|
|
64,762 |
| ||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ |
235,464 |
|
$ |
236,226 |
| ||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
1
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars In Thousands)
For the Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||
Gaming: |
||||||||
Casino |
$ |
23,069 |
|
$ |
9,841 |
| ||
Truck stop |
|
6,578 |
|
|
5,042 |
| ||
Pari-mutuel |
|
6,689 |
|
|
6,390 |
| ||
Food and beverage |
|
3,672 |
|
|
1,534 |
| ||
Convenience storeFuel |
|
4,759 |
|
|
2,796 |
| ||
Convenience storeOther |
|
828 |
|
|
706 |
| ||
Hotel |
|
316 |
|
|
136 |
| ||
Other |
|
583 |
|
|
820 |
| ||
Total revenues |
|
46,494 |
|
|
27,265 |
| ||
Promotional allowances |
|
(4,833 |
) |
|
(1,579 |
) | ||
Net revenues |
|
41,661 |
|
|
25,686 |
| ||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
||||||||
Gaming: |
||||||||
Casino |
|
7,181 |
|
|
2,980 |
| ||
Truck stop |
|
3,101 |
|
|
2,160 |
| ||
Pari-mutuel |
|
5,228 |
|
|
4,985 |
| ||
Food and beverage |
|
3,202 |
|
|
1,413 |
| ||
Convenience storeCost of fuel sold |
|
4,411 |
|
|
2,537 |
| ||
Convenience storeOther |
|
963 |
|
|
879 |
| ||
Hotel |
|
199 |
|
|
94 |
| ||
Marketing, general and administrative |
|
8,864 |
|
|
4,216 |
| ||
Privatization and other non-recurring costs |
|
455 |
| |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
2,151 |
|
|
1,403 |
| ||
Total costs and expenses |
|
35,300 |
|
|
21,122 |
| ||
OPERATING INCOME |
|
6,361 |
|
|
4,564 |
| ||
Interest income |
|
9 |
|
|
88 |
| ||
Interest expense |
|
(4,919 |
) |
|
(3,288 |
) | ||
INCOME BEFORE EQUITY IN LOSS OF INVESTMENTS AND MINORITY INTEREST |
|
1,451 |
|
|
1,364 |
| ||
Equity in loss of investmentsBlack Hawk and Lodge |
|
(1,980 |
) | |||||
Minority interest in lossColonial |
|
173 |
| |||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ |
1,451 |
|
$ |
(443 |
) | ||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
2
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003
(Dollars In Thousands)
Common Stock |
Additional |
Retained |
Total | ||||||||||
Shares |
Amount* |
||||||||||||
BALANCES, DECEMBER 31, 2002 |
1,500 |
$ |
27,992 |
$ |
36,770 |
$ |
64,762 | ||||||
Net income |
|
1,451 |
|
1,451 | |||||||||
BALANCES, MARCH 31, 2003 |
1,500 |
$ |
27,992 |
$ |
38,221 |
$ |
66,213 | ||||||
* | The par value amount of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. common stock outstanding for the periods presented is less than $500 and is therefore presented as $0 above due to rounding. |
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars In Thousands)
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ |
1,451 |
|
$ |
(443 |
) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activites: |
||||||||
Equity in loss of investments |
|
1,980 |
| |||||
Loss on sale of assets |
|
2 |
|
|||||
Minority interest in loss |
|
(173 |
) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
2,151 |
|
|
1,403 |
| ||
Deferred financing cost amortization |
|
337 |
|
|
141 |
| ||
Bond issue discount amortization |
|
231 |
|
|
101 |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effects of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
|
(17 |
) |
|
(291 |
) | ||
Inventories |
|
(117 |
) |
|
(41 |
) | ||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
(1,560 |
) |
|
(887 |
) | ||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
(5,860 |
) |
|
5,675 |
| ||
Net cash (used) in provided by operating activies |
|
(3,382 |
) |
|
7,465 |
| ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Additions to property, plant, and equipment |
|
(3,135 |
) |
|
(243 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sale of equipment |
|
5 |
|
|||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired: |
||||||||
Black Hawk Gaming |
|
(86,428 |
) | |||||
Colonial Downs |
|
(4,644 |
) | |||||
Truck stops |
|
(14,234 |
) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(3,130 |
) |
|
(105,549 |
) | ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net proceeds from bond issuance |
|
120,050 |
| |||||
Payments to obtain financing |
|
(49 |
) |
|
(5,568 |
) | ||
Proceeds from revolving line of credit |
|
2,500 |
|
|||||
Payments on long term debt |
|
(350 |
) |
|
(434 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
2,101 |
|
|
114,048 |
| ||
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(4,411 |
) |
|
15,964 |
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF THE YEAR |
|
21,358 |
|
|
3,119 |
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ |
16,947 |
|
$ |
19,083 |
| ||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ |
9,004 |
|
$ |
1,029 |
| ||
See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements
4
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
1. BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION
Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. (JEI or the Company) was formed on April 17, 2001, as a Subchapter S Corporation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended, to become a geographically diversified gaming and pari-mutuel wagering company with properties in Colorado, Nevada, Louisiana, and Virginia. The Companys sole stockholders, who each own 50% of JEIs common stock, are Jeffrey P. Jacobs and the Richard E. Jacobs Revocable Trust, of which Richard E. Jacobs is the sole trustee (collectively, Jacobs). As a result of the transactions described below, effective February 22, 2002, JEI owns and operates three casinos, six truck plaza video gaming facilities, and a horse racing track with three off-track wagering facilities. In addition, the Company receives a percentage of gaming revenue from an additional truck plaza video gaming facility and leases and operates a fourth off-track wagering facility.
On February 22, 2002, JEI completed the acquisition of a 100% interest in entities in which Jacobs owned either a full, majority, or minority interest. The entities involved in the transactions and the accounting treatment for the components of the acquisitions are described below and in Note 5.
Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd. (Diversified) and Jalou L.L.C. and Jalou II (collectively, Jalou)Jacobs contributed substantially all of their interests in Diversified and their 100% interest in Jalou II in exchange for 100% of the common stock of JEI. On the acquisition date, prior to the acquisition of the remaining shares of the entities described below, Diversified owned 100% of Jalou L.L.C., approximately 44% (with a majority voting interest of over fifty percent of the outstanding voting shares) of Colonial Holdings, Inc. (Colonial), approximately 32% of Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc. (Black Hawk), and a 25% interest in the Lodge Casino at Black Hawk (the Lodge), of which the remaining 75% was owned by Black Hawk. The exchange of JEI shares for the interests of Diversified and Jalou II on February 22, 2002, was accounted for as a combination of entities under common control, which is similar to the pooling of interests method of accounting for business combinations. Accordingly, JEIs results from January 1, 2002, through February 22, 2002, include consolidated operations of Colonial reduced by the 56% minority interest in earnings reflecting the earnings attributable to the common stock of Colonial not owned prior to the acquisition, 32%, and 25% of the operations of Black Hawk, and the Lodge, respectively, and 100% of the operations of these entities thereafter as a result of the acquisition of the remaining shares of these entities on February 22, 2002. Furthermore, the prior year financial statements of JEI reflect the pooled financial position, based on historical cost, and the results of operations of JEI, Diversified, and Jalou II as a result of the combination of entities under common control on February 22, 2002.
JalouJalou owns and operates six truck plaza video gaming facilities, and receives a percentage of gaming revenue from an additional truck plaza video gaming facility in Louisiana. The ownership interest of Jalou LLC and Jalou II (collectively, Jalou) and the acquisition dates for each property are as follows.
5
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Jalou LLCHouma Truck Plaza and Casino and an interest in the gaming revenues of Cashs Truck Plaza and Casino were acquired on February 7, 2001. Bayou Vista Truck Plaza and Casino and Lucky Magnolia Truck Stop and Casino were acquired on January 11, 2002, and Raceland Truck Plaza and Casino was acquired on February 22, 2002.
Jalou IIWinners Choice Casino was acquired on February 7, 2001, and Colonels Truck Plaza and Casino was acquired on January 11, 2002.
These acquisitions were recorded using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, and the total purchase price for these properties acquired in 2002 was approximately $20,282.
ColonialColonial owns and operates a horseracing track with three off-track wagering facilities, and leases and operates a fourth off-track wagering facility in Virginia. On February 22, 2002, JEI acquired the remaining 56% of Colonials common stock for approximately $4,644, which was recorded using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, and accordingly, 100% of Colonials operations are included in JEIs results for the period subsequent to the acquisition date.
Black HawkBlack Hawk owns a 75% interest in the Lodge and a 100% interest in both the Gilpin Hotel and Casino and the Gold Dust West Casino, located in Black Hawk, Colorado, and Reno, Nevada, respectively. On February 22, 2002, JEI acquired the remaining 68% of Black Hawks common stock for approximately $36,980 and assumed and refinanced approximately $59,950 of Black Hawks outstanding debt. This transaction was recorded using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, and accordingly, 100% of Black Hawks operations are included in JEIs results for the period subsequent to the acquisition date.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICES
Unaudited Consolidated Financial StatementsIn the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the various accounts of the Company after giving effect to the February 22, 2002 acquisitions as more fully described in Note 5. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of JEI and its most significant subsidiary, Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc. contained in the Companys Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2003.
ReclassificationsCertain amounts have been reclassified within the 2002 financial statements to conform to the presentation used in 2003.
6
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45) Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. This Interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The guarantee recognition and measurement provisions of this Interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements for periods ending after December 15, 2002.
7
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
The Company has adopted disclosure requirements effective for the year ended December 31, 2002 and will adopt the recognition and measurement provisions on a prospective basis. The Company does not expect the recognition and measurement provisions to have a material affect on the Companys statement of position or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46). This interpretation explains how to identify a variable interest entity and how to assess its interest in the variable interest to decide if consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the variable interest entity does not effectively disperse risk among parties involved. This interpretation applies immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003 and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise acquired an interest after that date. For variable interest entities in which an enterprise had acquired an interest in before February 1, 2003, it applies in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company has not yet completed its assessment of whether FIN 46 will affect its financial condition or results of operations. However, the Company does not anticipate that the adoption of FIN 46 will have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
3. LONG TERM DEBT
On February 8, 2002, JEI completed a $125,000 private placement of 11 7/8% Senior Secured Notes (the Notes) due 2009, with interest payable on each February 1 and August 1, with payments beginning August 1, 2002. The Notes were issued at a 3.96% discount from their principal amount, resulting in a discount of $4,950, which is being amortized using the effective interest method over the expected life of the Notes. The proceeds of the Notes were primarily used to fund the acquisition of the common stock of the entities described in Note 5, and to refinance certain debt of these entities in connection with the acquisitions. The Notes are secured by the assets and stock of, and are guaranteed by, the acquired entities. JEI has no independent assets or operations, and the guarantees on the Notes are full and unconditional and joint and several.
Effective July 12, 2002, the Company entered into a $10,000 line of credit (LOC) agreement with Foothill Capital Corporation, expiring July 12, 2007. The LOC bears interest at the prime rate published by Wells Fargo Bank, plus 1.75%. The LOC is collateralized by the land, buildings and related improvements of the Lodge and the Gilpin Hotel Casino, the companys Colorado casino properties. The security interests under the terms of the LOC are contractually senior to the security for the Notes.
8
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
4. ACQUISITIONS
The following table summarizes the values assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed and recorded as of February 22, 2002, for the transactions occurring on that date as described in Note 1.
Colonial |
Jalou |
Black Hawk |
Totals | |||||||||
Current assets |
$ |
3,237 |
$ |
6,053 |
$ |
17,864 |
$ |
27,154 | ||||
Property and equipment, net |
|
50,104 |
|
16,794 |
|
95,094 |
|
161,992 | ||||
Other assets |
|
41 |
|
1,684 |
|
1,725 | ||||||
Goodwill |
|
11,227 |
|
15,611 |
|
26,838 | ||||||
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
8,046 |
|
8,046 | ||||||||
Total assets acquired |
|
53,341 |
|
42,161 |
|
130,253 |
|
225,755 | ||||
Current liabilities |
|
8,214 |
|
2,081 |
|
9,184 |
|
19,479 | ||||
Long-term debt |
|
11,549 |
|
33,942 |
|
101,082 |
|
146,573 | ||||
Total liabilities assumed |
|
19,763 |
|
36,023 |
|
110,266 |
|
166,052 | ||||
Net assets acquitted |
$ |
33,578 |
$ |
6,138 |
$ |
19,987 |
$ |
59,703 | ||||
Identifiable intangible assets resulting from these acquisitions are comprised of $6,000 in revenue rights associated with the acquisition of Cashs Truck Plaza and Casino, and $2,046 in device use rights associated with the acquisitions of Houma Truck Plaza and Casino, Bayou Vista Truck Plaza and Casino, Lucky Magnolia Truck Stop and Casino, Raceland Truck Plaza and Casino, Winners Choice Casino and Colonels Truck Plaza and Casino. The revenue rights and the device use rights will be amortized over 50 years and 5 years, respectively, representing the initial terms of the related agreements. Goodwill resulting from the transactions is attributable to anticipated future cash flows associated with the acquired entities.
Assuming the transactions occurred at January 1, 2002, pro forma revenue and net income for the three-month period ended March 31, 2002 would have been as follows:
March 31, |
||||
Net revenue |
$ |
40,512 |
| |
Net income |
$ |
(3,834 |
) |
The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions occurred at the beginning of each period presented. The March 31, 2002 pro forma results include non-recurring charges related to stock options, derivative termination, and write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs at Black Hawk of $3,165, $2,655, and $1,543, respectively.
5. SEGMENTS
As defined by SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the following segment information is presented after the elimination of inter-segment transactions. JEI has four reportable segments (Colorado, Nevada, Virginia, and Louisiana) representing the states in which we operate our casinos, pari-mutuel and truck plaza/video poker facilities, respectively. The Colorado operations consist of the Lodge and Gilpin casinos, and the Nevada operations consist of the Gold Dust West casino. The Virginia
9
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
operations consist of the pari-mutuel operations and the Louisiana operations consist of the truck plaza / video poker facilities. Each segment is managed separately because of the unique characteristics of geographic location, revenue stream, and customer base. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2. The corporate operations represent all other revenues and expenses.
10
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
As of and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2003
(Dollars In Thousands)
Colorado |
Nevada |
Virginia |
Louisiana |
Total |
|||||||||||||||
Revenues |
|||||||||||||||||||
Gaming |
|||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
$ |
18,165 |
|
$ |
4,904 |
|
$ |
23,069 |
| ||||||||||
Truck stop |
$ |
6,578 |
|
|
6,578 |
| |||||||||||||
Pari-mutuel |
$ |
6,689 |
|
|
|
|
6,689 |
| |||||||||||
Food and beverage |
|
1,878 |
|
|
798 |
|
|
321 |
|
675 |
|
|
3,672 |
| |||||
Convenience storeFuel |
|
|
|
4,759 |
|
|
4,759 |
| |||||||||||
Convenience storeOther |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
828 |
| |||||||||||
Hotel |
|
182 |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
316 |
| ||||||||
Other |
|
117 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
327 |
|
116 |
|
|
583 |
| |||||
Total revenues |
|
20,342 |
|
|
5,859 |
|
|
7,337 |
|
12,956 |
|
|
46,494 |
| |||||
Promotional allowance |
|
(3,637 |
) |
|
(933 |
) |
|
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
(4,833 |
) | |||||
Net revenues |
$ |
16,705 |
|
$ |
4,926 |
|
$ |
7,337 |
$ |
12,693 |
|
$ |
41,661 |
| |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ |
1,103 |
|
$ |
295 |
|
$ |
332 |
$ |
395 |
|
$ |
2,125 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
26 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated depreciation and amortization |
$ |
2,151 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ |
3,055 |
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
$ |
569 |
$ |
2,883 |
|
$ |
7,615 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
(1,254 |
) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating income |
$ |
6,361 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
6 |
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
8 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
1 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated interest income |
$ |
9 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ |
2,707 |
|
$ |
781 |
|
$ |
74 |
$ |
489 |
|
$ |
4,051 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
868 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated interest expense |
$ |
4,919 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
349 |
|
$ |
327 |
|
$ |
501 |
$ |
2,395 |
|
$ |
3,572 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
$ |
(2,121 |
) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net income |
$ |
1,451 |
| ||||||||||||||||
EBITDA(1) |
$ |
4,158 |
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
$ |
901 |
$ |
3,278 |
|
$ |
9,740 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
$ |
(1,228 |
) | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated EBITDA |
$ |
8,512 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net |
$ |
6,711 |
|
$ |
8,836 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
11,226 |
|
$ |
26,773 |
| |||||
Identifiable intangible assets |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
7,379 |
|
$ |
7,379 |
| |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ |
80,139 |
|
$ |
11,816 |
|
$ |
54,146 |
$ |
16,925 |
|
$ |
163,026 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
220 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated net property, plant and equipment, net |
$ |
163,246 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ |
105,733 |
|
$ |
24,339 |
|
$ |
59,356 |
$ |
43,482 |
|
$ |
232,910 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
2,554 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated total assets |
$ |
235,464 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ |
80,482 |
|
$ |
22,300 |
|
$ |
2,294 |
$ |
19,489 |
|
$ |
124,565 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
25,076 |
| ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated total long-term debt |
$ |
149,641 |
| ||||||||||||||||
11
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2002
(Balance Sheet data as of December 31, 2002)
(Dollars In Thousands)
Colorado |
Nevada |
Virginia |
Louisiana |
Total |
||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||
Gaming |
||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
$ |
7,873 |
|
$ |
1,968 |
|
$ |
9,841 |
| |||||||||
Truck stop |
$ |
5,042 |
|
5,042 |
| |||||||||||||
Pari-mutuel |
$ |
6,390 |
|
|
|
6,390 |
| |||||||||||
Food and beverage |
|
870 |
|
|
218 |
|
|
83 |
|
363 |
|
1,534 |
| |||||
Convenience storeFuel |
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
2,796 |
| |||||||||||
Convenience storeOther |
|
|
|
706 |
|
706 |
| |||||||||||
Hotel |
|
108 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
136 |
| |||||||
Other |
|
49 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
719 |
|
39 |
|
820 |
| |||||
Total revenues |
|
8,900 |
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
7,192 |
|
8,946 |
|
27,265 |
| |||||
Promotional allowance |
|
(1,336 |
) |
|
(243 |
) |
|
(1,579 |
) | |||||||||
Net revenues |
$ |
7,564 |
|
$ |
1,984 |
|
$ |
7,192 |
$ |
8,946 |
$ |
25,686 |
| |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ |
505 |
|
$ |
98 |
|
$ |
437 |
$ |
346 |
$ |
1,386 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
17 |
| |||||||||||||||
Consolidated depreciation and amortization |
$ |
1,403 |
| |||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ |
1,689 |
|
$ |
422 |
|
$ |
837 |
$ |
1,874 |
$ |
4,822 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
(258 |
) | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated operating income |
$ |
4,564 |
| |||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
7 |
$ |
2 |
$ |
12 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
76 |
| |||||||||||||||
Consolidated interest income |
$ |
88 |
| |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ |
514 |
|
$ |
436 |
|
$ |
643 |
$ |
567 |
$ |
2,160 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
1,128 |
| |||||||||||||||
Consolidated interest expense |
$ |
3,288 |
| |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before equity in loss of investments and minority interest in loss |
$ |
1,177 |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
$ |
201 |
$ |
1,309 |
$ |
2,674 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
$ |
(1,310 |
) | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated total income before equity in loss of investments and minority interest in loss |
$ |
1,364 |
| |||||||||||||||
Equity in loss of investments |
$ |
(1,980 |
) |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
(1,980 |
) | |||||
Minority Interest in lossColonial |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
173 |
$ |
|
$ |
173 |
| |||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(803 |
) |
$ |
(13 |
) |
$ |
201 |
$ |
1,309 |
$ |
694 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
(1,137 |
) | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated net income |
$ |
(443 |
) | |||||||||||||||
EBITDA(1) |
$ |
2,194 |
|
$ |
520 |
|
$ |
1,274 |
$ |
2,220 |
$ |
6,208 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
(241 |
) | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated EBITDA |
$ |
5,967 |
| |||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net |
$ |
6,765 |
|
$ |
8,847 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
11,226 |
$ |
26,838 |
| |||||
Identifiable intangible assets |
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
$ |
7,522 |
$ |
7,522 |
| |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ |
81,225 |
|
$ |
11,804 |
|
$ |
54,116 |
$ |
16,072 |
$ |
163,217 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
233 |
| |||||||||||||||
Consolidated net property, plant and equipment, net |
$ |
163,450 |
| |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ |
113,416 |
|
$ |
23,962 |
|
$ |
57,478 |
$ |
41,359 |
$ |
236,215 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
11 |
| |||||||||||||||
Consolidated total assets |
$ |
236,226 |
| |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ |
72,982 |
|
$ |
22,300 |
|
$ |
2,440 |
$ |
19,489 |
$ |
117,211 |
| |||||
Corporate adjustments and eliminations |
|
29,902 |
| |||||||||||||||
Consolidated total long-term debt |
$ |
147,113 |
| |||||||||||||||
12
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
(1) | EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is presented as supplemental information in the tables above and in the discussion of our operating results. EBITDA can be reconciled directly to our consolidated operating income by adding the amounts shown for depreciation and amortization to operating income. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any measure of performance as promulgated under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, such as operating income or net income (loss), nor should it be considered as an indicator of our overall financial performance. Our calculation of EBITDA may be different from the calculation used by other companies and comparability may be limited. Management believes that presentation of a non-GAAP financial measure such as EBITDA is useful because it allows investors and management to evaluate and compare the Companys operating results from continuing operations from period to period in a meaningful and consistent manner in addition to standard GAAP financial measures. Management internally evaluates the performance of its properties using EBITDA measures as do most analysts following the gaming industry. EBITDA is also a component of certain financial covenants in the Companys debt agreements. |
6. SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION
For the period prior to the acquisition of Black Hawk on February 22, 2002, the Company accounted for its 32% interest in Black Hawk and its 25% interest in the Lodge using the equity method. Condensed data for the period prior to the February 22, 2002 transaction is as follows:
January 1 - February 22 , |
||||||||
Black Hawk |
Lodge |
|||||||
Statements of Income |
||||||||
Revenues, net |
$ |
13,970 |
|
$ |
8,658 |
| ||
Operating expenses |
|
17,145 |
|
|
7,734 |
| ||
Operating income |
|
(3,175 |
) |
|
924 |
| ||
Other Income |
|
119 |
|
|||||
Interest expense, net |
|
2,868 |
|
|
1,430 |
| ||
Loss before minority interest |
|
(5,924 |
) |
|
(506 |
) | ||
Minority interest |
|
126 |
|
|
|
| ||
Net loss |
$ |
(5,798 |
) |
$ |
(506 |
) | ||
Equity in net loss of investment |
$ |
(1,853 |
) |
$ |
(126 |
) | ||
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Colonial entered into a Management and Consulting Agreement, as amended (the Management Agreement), with Maryland-Virginia Racing Circuit, Inc. (the Circuit), an affiliate of the Maryland Jockey Club (MJC), to provide experienced management for the racetrack and off-track facilities and to create a Virginia-Maryland thoroughbred racing circuit. Under the Management Agreement, MJC agrees to suspend live racing at their racetracks, Laurel Park and Pimlico Race Course, during Colonials live thoroughbred meets. Parties to the Management Agreement also exchange simulcast signals for their live meets at no cost to either party. The Circuit manages Colonials off-track facilities as well as the live standardbred and thoroughbred
13
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
meets and provides certain personnel, at its expense, for the live thoroughbred meet. For its services, the Circuit receives a management fee of 1.0% of the first $75 million of the aggregate gross amounts wagered in any calendar year in the Commonwealth of Virginia, excluding certain amounts specified in the Management Agreement (Handle), and 2.0% of all Handle in excess of $75 million per calendar year. In February 2003, Colonial entered into an amendment to the Management Agreement pursuant to which the Circuit agreed to a management fee of 1.5% of Handle in excess of $125 million generated from the racetrack and its off-track facilities. The Management Agreement will remain in effect until 2046, provided Colonial owns, controls, or operates the racetrack under its existing licenses. At Colonials option, Colonial may terminate the Management Agreement any time after 2021 upon payment of a fee equal to 17 times the average management fee paid during the three years immediately preceding such termination. Management fees incurred under the Management Agreement were approximately $431 and $404 during each of the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively.
Colonial has entered into an agreement with a totalisator company which provides wagering services and designs, programs, and manufactures totalisator systems for use in wagering applications. The basic terms of the agreement state that the totalisator company shall provide totalisator services to Colonial for all wagering held at Colonials facilities through 2004 at a rate of .365% of the gross amounts wagered.
On May 25, 2001, a lawsuit was filed in The United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Case No. 01-D-0964) (MJW) by Central City, several casino operators located in Central City and others against the City of Black Hawk, the Black Hawk Gaming Association (formerly the Black Hawk Casino Owners Association) and several casino operators located in the City of Black Hawk, including Black Hawk. The suit alleges that the defendants caused economic harm to the plaintiffs by engaging in a conspiracy and scheme to harm competition, restrain trade and monopolize the gaming industry in the Gilpin County, Colorado market in violation of federal and state constitutional, statutory and common law. Also, the complaint alleges that starting in 1996 the City of Black Hawk began interfering in Central Citys plans to construct a road directly from Interstate 70 to Central City. The plaintiffs seek compensatory, treble and exemplary damages against the defendants in amounts to be proven at trial along with interest, costs and attorneys fees. According to news reports, on March 13, 2003, Central Citys city council voted to withdraw from the lawsuit. Central City has since sought to be dismissed from the lawsuit, but to date has not yet been dismissed. Also according to news reports, the remaining plaintiffs intend to continue the lawsuit. On March 26, 2003, the district court entered an order dismissing with prejudice the plaintiffs seventh, eighth, eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth claims for relief (i.e., the state common law claims and the claims under RICO and its Colorado statutory counterpart (COCCA)). The court set a further hearing on the motions to dismiss the state and federal antitrust claims, to be held June 13, 2003. We believe that this lawsuit is without merit and we intend to contest it vigorously. We are unable to reasonably estimate the amount or range of amounts, if any associated with this litigation. However, the Company does not believe the suit will result in any material liability.
In March 2003, Galactic Gaming, Inc., one of the Plaintiffs in Case No. 01-D-0964 (MJW), filed an action in District Court in Jefferson County, Colorado, Case No. 03CV0793, Division 7, against many of the same defendants as in Case No. 01-D-0964 (MJW), including Black Hawk Gaming. That state court action asserts state common law claims identical or virtually identical to those that were asserted and dismissed with prejudice in the federal action. Defendants have moved to dismiss the state court action on res judicata grounds. That motion is pending. We believe that this state court action is without merit and intend to contest it vigorously. We are unable to reasonably estimate the amount or range of amounts, if any associated with this litigation. However, the Company does not believe the suit will result in any material liability.
On June 25, 1999, a complaint against the Lodge and John Does 1-3 was filed by a casino operating downstream from these casinos. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the plaintiff is being damaged by subsurface water flows onto its property from the Lodge property and the properties of John Does 1-3. The Lodge has denied all liability and has turned the matter over to its insurance carrier for defense. The Company does not believe the suit has merit and will continue to defend against the allegations alleged by the plaintiff. We are unable to reasonably estimate the amount or range of amounts, if any associated with this litigation. However, the Company does not believe the suit will result in any material liability.
The Company is involved in routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. These matters are believed by the Company to be covered by appropriate insurance policies.
9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company provides monthly management and accounting services to truck stops owned by an affiliate. In addition, the affiliate purchases repair parts from the Company. Total charges to
14
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 AND 2002
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
the affiliate for management services and repair part purchases totaled $65 for the three months ended March 31, 2003.
As of March 31, 2003, the Company had recorded a receivable of $29 from the affiliate for management services and repair part purchases.
The Company is obligated on notes to Jacobs totaling $9,000, with interest only payable semi-annually at 12% per annum, and the principal amount due and payable on January 31, 2010. These notes were issued in connection with the acquisition of the Louisiana truck stops. Additionally, the Company is obligated on $10,489 of notes issued by the seller in connection with the acquisition of additional truck stops. These notes are due in March 2009, bear interest at 8.5% payable semi-annually and are secured by land, buildings and related improvements of the Louisiana truck stops. Jacobs acquired these notes from the seller of the truck stops on February 13, 2003 for $7,000. The terms and conditions of the Notes acquired by Jacobs are identical to those described above. As a result of this transaction, for tax purposes JEI will recognize taxable income in the form of a discharge of indebtedness of $3,489 representing the difference between the $10,489 seller notes and the acquisition price of $7,000, which will flow through JEIs tax return to its shareholders.
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section discusses the results of our operations on a historical basis followed by a discussion of our results of operations comparing actual results for the three months ended March 31, 2003 with results prepared on a pro forma basis for the three months ended March 31, 2002, beginning on page 23. The pro forma information is provided to present the results of our operations as though the business combinations described herein had been completed at the beginning of each period presented. You should read the following discussions and analyses in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002 included in our Form 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain statements contained in this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations constitute forward-looking statements, which statements involve risks and uncertainties. In this regard, see the section Risk Factors in Item 1 of our 10-K report.
Historical information, other than revenues, may not necessarily be meaningful, as our cost structure, debt structure, capitalization, and the overall composition of our company following the transactions discussed herein and our Form 10-K filing have significantly changed subsequent to February 22, 2002. Further, the historical information should not necessarily be taken as a reliable indicator of our future performance due to the recent acquisitions.
Introduction
On February 22, 2002, we completed a merger transaction, which was primarily funded by the proceeds from the issuance of $125 million in senior secured notes on February 8, 2002. These notes bear an 11 7/8% interest rate and are due in 2009. The principal components of the merger transaction are as follows:
On February 22, 2002 Jeffrey P. Jacobs and The Richard E. Jacobs Revocable Trust contributed substantially all of their interests in Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd. (Diversified) and their combined 100% interest in Jalou II in exchange for 100% of the common stock of JEI. On the acquisition date, immediately prior to the acquisition of the publicly held shares of Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc. (BHWK) and Colonial Holdings, Inc. (Colonial) described below, Diversified owned 100% of Jalou L.L.C., approximately 44% of Colonial, approximately 32% of BHWK, and a 25% interest in the Lodge Casino at Black Hawk (the Lodge) (of which the remaining 75% was owned by BHWK). The exchange of JEI shares for the interests of Diversified and Jalou II was accounted for as a combination of entities under common control, which is similar to the pooling of interests method of accounting for business combinations. The results of operations of Diversified and Jalou II are presented in the JEI income statement as though this transaction had been completed at the beginning of the earliest year presented.
The ownership interest of the Jalou entities and the acquisition dates for each property are as follows:
Date acquired | ||
Jalou, LLC: |
||
Houma Truck Plaza and Casino |
February 7, 2001 | |
Cashs Casino |
February 7, 2001 | |
Bayou Vista Truck Plaza and Casino |
January 11, 2002 | |
Lucky Magnolia Truck Stop and Casino |
January 11, 2002 | |
Raceland Truck Plaza and Casino |
February 22, 2002 |
16
Jalou II: |
||
Winners Choice Casino |
February 7, 2001 | |
Colonels Truck Plaza and Casino |
January 11, 2002 |
These acquisitions were recorded using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, and the total purchase price for the properties acquired in 2002 was approximately $20.3 million.
On February 22, 2002, JEI also acquired the remaining 56% of Colonials common stock for approximately $4.6 million, which was recorded using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. JEI also acquired the remaining 68% of BHWKs common stock for approximately $37.0 million on February 22, 2002. This transaction was recorded using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations. As a result, the operations of Colonial and BHWK are consolidated with JEI for the period subsequent to the February 22, 2002 acquisition date.
All of the Jalou property acquisitions completed prior to December 31, 2002, were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the results of Diversified and Jalou II for the year ended December 31, 2002 include the completed Louisiana acquisitions from the date of acquisition. We have described below the detail of the components of the operations of JEI for the periods presented.
As a result of this transaction, we are a geographically diversified gaming and pari-mutuel wagering company with properties in Colorado, Nevada, Louisiana and Virginia. We own and operate three casinos, six truck plaza video gaming facilities and a horseracing track with three off-track wagering facilities. In addition, we are a party to an agreement that entitles us to a portion of the gaming revenue from an additional truck plaza video gaming facility and we lease and operate a fourth off-track wagering facility.
We have elected to be taxed under the provisions of Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Under those provisions, the owners of our company pay income taxes on our taxable income.
As a result of the acquisition and privatization of the entities described above, the number of our subsidiaries and investments has significantly increased at various times during the three month period ended March 31, 2002 and we have experienced a number of changes affecting the comparability of the periods covered in these discussions.
Comparison of the historical operations for the three months ended March 31, 2003 to the three months ended March 31, 2002
The following discussion presents an analysis of the historical results of our operations for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002.
For the three months ended March 31, 2003 the consolidated statement of income of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. includes 100% of the operations of its subsidiaries, whereas the comparable period of 2002 included the results of the entities as described below:
For the three months ended March 31, 2002, the consolidated statement of income of JEI consisted of the following:
a. | The consolidated operations of Colonial for the period from January 1, 2002 through February 22, 2002, reduced by the 56% minority interest in earnings reflecting the earnings attributable to the common stock of Colonial not owned |
17
prior to the acquisition of the minority interest on February 22, 2002 (affiliates of JEI owned a controlling financial interest through a majority voting interest of over fifty percent of the outstanding voting shares of Colonial); plus |
b. | All of the operations of Colonial for the period from February 22, 2002 through March 31, 2002 because of the acquisition of the minority interest on February 22, 2002; plus |
c. | All of the operations of Jalou LLC attributable to Houma and an interest in the gaming revenues of Cashs for the entire three months ended March 31, 2002; plus |
d. | All of the operations of Jalou II attributable to the Winners Choice for the entire three months ended March 31, 2002; plus |
e. | All of the operations of Jalou LLC attributable to Lucky Magnolia and Bayou Vista for the period from their January 11, 2002 acquisition date through March 31, 2002; plus |
f. | All of the operations of Jalou II attributable to Colonels for the period from its January 11, 2002 acquisition date through March 31, 2002; plus |
g. | All of the operations of Jalou LLC attributable to Raceland from its February 22, 2002 acquisition date through March 31, 2002; plus |
h. | 25% of the equity in earnings of the Lodge for the period from January 1, 2002 through February 22, 2002; plus |
i. | 32% of the equity in earnings of BHWK for the period from January 1, 2002 through February 22, 2002; plus |
j. | 100% of the operations of BHWK (which includes the Lodge) for the period from February 22, 2002 through March 31, 2002 because of the acquisition of the remaining shares on February 22, 2002. |
As illustrated by the differing entities and periods covered by the various transactions discussed above, a comparison between the three month periods on a historical basis is difficult.
18
A summary of our consolidated operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
Three Months Ended |
|||||||
2003 |
2002 |
||||||
Net revenue: |
|||||||
Gaming-Casinos |
$ |
27,014 |
$ |
13,305 |
| ||
Gaming-Pari-mutuel |
|
6,689 |
|
6,390 |
| ||
Other |
|
7,958 |
|
5,991 |
| ||
Total net revenue |
$ |
41,661 |
$ |
25,686 |
| ||
Operating income |
$ |
6,361 |
$ |
4,564 |
| ||
Interest expense |
$ |
4,919 |
$ |
3,288 |
| ||
Equity in loss of investmentsBlack Hawk and the Lodge |
$ |
|
$ |
(1,980 |
) | ||
Minority interest in loss-Colonial |
$ |
|
$ |
173 |
| ||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
1,451 |
$ |
(443 |
) | ||
The overall composition of our financial position and the results of our operations have significantly changed for the three month period ended March 31, 2003 as compared to the three month period ended March 31, 2002. The changes are primarily attributable to the following factors:
| The 2003 results include 100% of Colonials operations. The 2002 results include 100% of Colonials operations for the period following the February 22, 2002 acquisition date plus 100% of operations reduced by the 56% minority interest prior to that date in 2002 (which existed until the February 22, 2002 acquisition date). We no longer recorded minority interest for the results of operations subsequent to February 22, 2002 because we owned 100% of Colonial as of that date. The comparability of pari-mutuel revenues is not impacted by the acquisition of stock from the minority shareholders because Colonials results were also consolidated in 2002. The increase in our three months ended March 31, 2003 pari-mutuel revenue from the three months period ended March 31, 2002 is due primarily to increased wagering at Colonials off-track wagering facilities. |
| The 2003 results include 100% of BHWKs revenues, compared to the same period in 2002 where results include 100% of BHWKs revenues for the period from the February 22, 2002 acquisition date through March 31, 2002. For the period prior to the February 22, 2002 acquisition, BHWKs and the Lodges results were included as a component of equity in loss of investments. Subsequent to the |
19
February 22, 2002 transaction we no longer recorded equity in loss of investments relative to BHWK and the Lodge because as of that date we owned 100% of BHWK, which includes the Lodge. Therefore, our equity in loss of investments of approximately $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002 is not comparable to the consolidated results shown in the current three-month period. The equity in loss of investments for the three-month period ending March 31, 2002 was primarily the result of the write off of various costs and expenses of BHWK relating to our acquisition of the remaining outstanding shares on February 22, 2002. See Note 5 in the accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for a further description of these costs.
| In addition to gaming revenue for BHWK for the current three-month period, the 2003 gaming revenue also includes video poker revenue for the seven truck stop locations for the entire three-month period, whereas the 2002 results include only 3 locations for the entire three-month period, 3 locations from their January 11, 2002 acquisition date through March 31, 2002, and 1 location from its February 22, 2002 acquisition date through March 31, 2002. |
| Other revenue in 2003 is primarily comprised of sales from the convenience store, fuel and restaurant operations located in the seven truck stop facilities that we owned for the full three month period in 2003 combined with food, beverage, and hotel revenues of BHWK for the full three month period ended 2003. Other revenue in the three month period ended 2002 consisted of similar revenues from three truck stops for the full three month period, three truck stops for the period from their acquisition on January 11, 2002 through March 31, 2002, one truck stop from its acquisition date of February 22, 2002 through March 31, 2002 and food, beverage, and hotel revenues from our three casinos subsequent to February 22, 2002 through March 31, 2002 (recall that all casino operations were included as a component of equity in (loss) earnings for periods prior to the February 22, 2002 acquisition date). |
| Interest expense in 2003 includes, among other debt, a full quarter of interest related to our $125.0 million debt offering as compared to 2002, which only included interest charges from February 8, 2002 to March 31, 2002. |
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We periodically evaluate our policies and the estimates and assumptions related to these policies. All of our subsidiary companies operate in a highly regulated industry. In our Colorado, Virginia, Louisiana and Nevada operations, we are subject to regulations that describe and regulate operating and internal control procedures. The majority of our casino revenue is in the form of cash, personal checks, credit cards or gaming chips and tokens, which by their nature do not require complex estimations. We estimate certain liabilities with payment periods that extend for longer than several months. Such estimates include our slot club liabilities, outstanding gaming chip, token and pari-mutuel ticket liability, self-insured medical and workers compensation liabilities, and litigation costs. We believe that these estimates are reasonable based on our past experience with the business and based upon our assumptions related to possible outcomes in the future. Future actual results will likely differ from these estimates.
20
Long-lived Assets
We have determined that the policy associated with our long-lived assets, goodwill and identifiable intangible assets, and related estimates are critical to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We have a significant investment in long-lived property and equipment. We estimate that the undiscounted future cash flow expected to result from the use of these assets exceed the current carrying value of these assets. Any adverse change to the estimate of these undiscounted cash flows could necessitate an impairment charge that would adversely affect operating results. We estimate the useful lives for our assets based on historical experience, estimates of assets commercial lives, and the likelihood of technological obsolescence. Should the actual useful life of a class of assets differ from the estimated useful life, we would record an impairment charge. We review useful lives and obsolescence and assess commercial viability of our assets periodically.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On February 22, 2002 we completed the sale of $125 million of our senior secured notes. Our notes are due 2009 and we pay annual interest at the rate of 11 7/8 % on a semi-annual basis. The notes were offered at 96.04% of par and we received net proceeds at closing of $120.05 million. We utilized the proceeds of the Notes plus cash from our combined companies of approximately $8.0 million to acquire the remaining shares of BHWK for approximately $37.0 million (which includes $3.1 million for the buyout of all outstanding options at February 22, 2002), assume and refinance BHWKs existing reducing revolving credit facility totaling approximately $60.0 million and pay BHWKs interest rate swap breakage costs of $1.1 million (net of tax benefit) on the acquisition date; acquire the remaining shares of Colonial for $4.6 million; pay the cash portion of the purchase price for the Louisiana truck plazas of $14.5 million; pay accrued interest, advances and other payables to affiliates of $3.2 million; and pay remaining transaction fees and expenses incurred subsequent to December 31, 2002, totaling an estimated $2.4 million. In addition, we issued $5.8 million of promissory notes to the sellers of the Louisiana truck plazas we acquired.
At March 31, 2003, after giving effect to the recent acquisitions, cash and cash equivalents are approximately $16.9 million. Our total debt approximates $151.8 million.
We entered into a new $10 million senior credit facility on July 12, 2002. The trustee under the indenture of the senior secured notes executed an intercreditor agreement with the lender under the senior credit facility, which, among other things, subordinated some of the liens securing the senior secured notes and the guarantees to the indebtedness under the senior credit facility. The senior credit facility carries an interest rate of 1.75% above the prime rate and expires in July 2007. At March 31, 2003, $2,500 was outstanding on the senior credit facility.
Our future liquidity, which includes our ability to make semi-annual interest payments, depends upon the future success of the overall Company. Additionally, our ability to successfully integrate our operations is a significant factor in the overall generation of our cash flows from operations.
At present, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or transactions with unconsolidated, limited purpose entities nor are any contemplated in the future.
We believe that our cash flow from operations, cash and cash equivalents and our senior credit facility of $10 million discussed above will be adequate to meet our debt service obligations as well as our capital expenditure requirements for the next twelve months. However, we can give no assurance that these sources of cash will be sufficient to enable us to do so. Further, in addition to our normal capital expenditure requirements, we began a $6.0 million expansion of the Gilpin in the third quarter of 2002, and we anticipate that we will pursue the acquisition of other properties
21
and engage in new development opportunities. We believe we will be able to pay for the expansion project of the Gilpin out of our existing cash flow over the remaining construction time of the addition. However, we may need to enter into new financing arrangements and raise additional capital in the future if we are unable to sustain our current operations. Our ability to incur additional debt is further restricted by the terms and covenants of our senior secured notes. We can give no assurance that we will be able to raise capital or obtain the necessary sources of liquidity and financing on favorable terms, if at all. Additionally, any debt financing that we may incur in the future will increase the amount of our total outstanding indebtedness and our debt service requirements, and heighten the related risks we currently face.
We also face the risk that there could be a decline in the demand for our products and services, which would reduce our ability to generate funds from operations. While we believe our cash flows are geographically diverse, at present we do have a significant concentration of cash flows generated in the Black Hawk gaming market. Should the Black Hawk market decline or become saturated or should the competition erode our market share, we would suffer a decline in the available funds generated from operations. If this were to occur, there exists the possibility that our credit rating could be downgraded, which would further reduce our ability to access the capital markets and obtain additional or alternative financing.
The following table provides disclosure concerning JEIs obligations and commitments to make future payments under contracts, such as debt and lease agreements, and purchase and other long-term obligations as of March 31, 2003.
Total |
Less than 1 |
1-3 |
4-5 |
After 5 | |||||||||||
(In Thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt(1) |
$ |
151,790 |
$ |
2,230 |
$ |
5,580 |
$ |
3,066 |
$ |
140,914 | |||||
Operating Leases(2) |
|
12,531 |
|
1,461 |
|
940 |
|
630 |
|
9,500 | |||||
Other Long-Term Obligations(3) |
|
5,440 |
|
476 |
|
952 |
|
952 |
|
3,060 | |||||
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
$ |
169,761 |
$ |
4,167 |
$ |
7,472 |
$ |
4,648 |
$ |
153,474 | |||||
(1) | Long-term debt includes amounts owing under the terms of the Notes, the Senior Credit Facility, the Black Hawk special assessment bonds, indebtedness of Colonial Holdings, the existing and new Louisiana Properties seller notes (acquired by affiliate in 2003. See Note 9), and the subordinated debt to affiliate. |
(2) | Operating leases include a land and warehouse lease for the Gold Dust in Reno, Nevada, as well as other leases for property and equipment. |
(3) | Other long-term obligations include the commitment of the Companys truck stop operations to pay $1 per video poker machine per day, plus $1,000 per machine annually in licensing to an outside party to maintain its video poker machines in its truck stop premises. Other long-term obligations also include amounts payable under employment contracts described in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
In addition, JEI has the following commitments and obligations:
22
| JEI, through its subsidiary Colonial, has entered into an agreement with a totalisator company, which provides wagering services and designs, programs, and manufactures totalisator systems for use in wagering applications. The basic terms of the agreement state that the totalisator company shall provide totalisator services to Colonial for all wagering held at Colonials facilities through 2004 at a rate of .365% of handle. In addition, Colonial agreed to use certain equipment provided by the totalisator company. |
| JEI, through the Lucky Magnolia, has an obligation to pay to an individual 4.9% of its net video poker revenue, after associated state taxes, for as long as video poker machines are operated on the property. |
Pro Forma Results of Operations
The following pro forma information is provided to present the results of operations as though the business combinations described above had been completed at the beginning of the three month period ended March 31, 2002 as compared to actual results for the three month period ended March 31, 2003. The information presented is by each segment in which we have operations and presents our EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). Management believes that presentation of a non-GAAP financial measure such as EBITDA is useful because it allows investors and management to evaluate and compare the Companys operating results from continuing operations from period to period in a meaningful and consistent manner in addition to standard GAAP financial measures. Management internally evaluates the performance of its properties using EBITDA measures as do most analysts following the gaming industry. EBITDA is also a component of certain financial covenants in the Companys debt agreements. EBITDA is presented as a supplement in the tables below and in the discussion of our operating results. EBITDA can be reconciled directly to our consolidated operating income by adding the amounts shown for depreciation and amortization to operating income. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any measure of performance as promulgated under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, such as operating income or net (loss) income, nor should it be considered as an indicator of our overall financial performance. Our calculation of EBITDA may be different from the calculation used by other companies and comparability may be limited. The components of operations presented below differ from the analysis provided above for actual results as the composition of the company has changed due to the transactions occurring during the first quarter of 2002. The following presentations reflect 100% of the operations for all entities for the respective three-month periods and, therefore, management believes this represents the most appropriate method of presenting the true operating performance capabilities of the combined operations of the entities involved.
23
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||
NET REVENUE |
||||||||
Colorado |
$ |
16,705 |
|
$ |
18,856 |
| ||
Nevada |
|
4,926 |
|
|
4,662 |
| ||
Louisiana |
|
12,693 |
|
|
10,019 |
| ||
Virginia |
|
7,337 |
|
|
6,975 |
| ||
Total net revenue |
$ |
41,661 |
|
$ |
40,512 |
| ||
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
||||||||
Colorado |
$ |
12,547 |
|
$ |
13,405 |
| ||
Nevada |
|
3,523 |
|
|
3,497 |
| ||
Louisiana |
|
9,415 |
|
|
7,214 |
| ||
Virginia |
|
6,436 |
|
|
6,043 |
| ||
Net corporate overhead |
|
1,228 |
|
|
5,140 |
| ||
Total costs and expenses |
$ |
33,149 |
|
$ |
35,299 |
| ||
EBITDA |
||||||||
Colorado |
$ |
4,158 |
|
$ |
5,451 |
| ||
Nevada |
|
1,403 |
|
|
1,165 |
| ||
Louisiana |
|
3,278 |
|
|
2,805 |
| ||
Virginia |
|
901 |
|
|
932 |
| ||
Net corporate overhead |
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
(5,140 |
) | ||
EBITDA |
$ |
8,512 |
|
$ |
5,213 |
| ||
24
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure to operating income (loss), a GAAP financial measure.
Reconciliation of EBITDA to operating income
Three months ended March 31, 2003 |
EBITDA |
Depreciation and |
Operating |
||||||||
Colorado |
$ |
4,158 |
|
$ |
1,103 |
$ |
3,055 |
| |||
Nevada |
|
1,403 |
|
|
295 |
|
1,108 |
| |||
Louisiana |
|
3,278 |
|
|
395 |
|
2,883 |
| |||
Virginia |
|
901 |
|
|
332 |
|
569 |
| |||
Corporate overhead |
|
(1,228 |
) |
|
26 |
|
(1,254 |
) | |||
TOTAL |
$ |
8,512 |
|
$ |
2,151 |
$ |
6,361 |
| |||
Three months ended March 31, 2002 |
EBITDA Pro forma |
Depreciation and |
Operating |
||||||||
Colorado |
$ |
5,451 |
|
$ |
2,446 |
$ |
3,005 |
| |||
Nevada |
|
1,165 |
|
|
677 |
|
488 |
| |||
Louisiana |
|
2,805 |
|
|
392 |
|
2,413 |
| |||
Virginia |
|
932 |
|
|
437 |
|
495 |
| |||
Corporate overhead |
|
(5,140 |
) |
|
6 |
|
(5,146 |
) | |||
TOTAL |
$ |
5,213 |
|
$ |
3,958 |
$ |
1,255 |
| |||
The pro forma EBITDA for the three-month period ending March 31, 2002 that we previously reported has been re-characterized as pro forma EBITDA resulting from the following changes in the current presentation:
| Costs and expenses in Colorado have been increased by management fees incurred in the amount of $227 for the period January 1, 2002 through February 22, 2002. No management fees were incurred during the three-month period ended March 31, 2003. |
| Corporate overhead costs and expenses have been increased by transaction related non-recurring privatization costs and expenses of $4,162 which included a $3,165 charge related to the redemption of outstanding stock options of Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc. and $997 in accounting, legal and other expenses. |
Colorado
We continually review the overall operational aspects of our casino operations and attempt to modify our operations, when and if necessary, to remain competitive and to maintain our market share. We focus on our existing customer base while developing marketing programs that increase new customer visits. Our vision is to be the best locals casino in each market by offering the best customer service, slot selection, player club benefits, and food and beverage service in the market.
Our casino revenues are generated from our three casino properties. BHWKs consolidated casino revenues are generally defined as the casino win which is the amount of money wagered less the amount paid out in prizes. BHWKs consolidated net revenue is generally defined as casino win reduced by various promotional allowances and incentive programs that we offer to patrons and includes revenues from food and beverage, hotel and other revenues. We utilize the food and beverage department of each of our properties to drive revenues by offering a wide selection of high quality food choices at reasonable prices. Additionally, we have 50 hotel rooms at the Lodge and 106 hotel rooms at our Reno property, which we can offer to players, thereby enhancing their visit to the Black Hawk and Reno areas, respectively.
25
After giving effect to the transactions discussed above, JEI owns 100% of BHWK. BHWK owns the Gilpin Hotel Casino and the Lodge, which are located in Black Hawk, Colorado, and the Gold Dust West, Inc. (Gold Dust), which is located in Reno, Nevada. Generally, the acquisition by JEI of all of the capital stock of BHWK as of February 22, 2002 does not affect the comparability of the pro forma operations of BHWK. The following discussion pertains to the results of operations of the Lodge and Gilpin properties.
A summary of the net revenue, costs and expenses and EBITDA of our Colorado properties is as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||
2003 |
2002 | |||||
Net revenues |
||||||
Lodge |
$ |
13,238 |
$ |
14,580 | ||
Gilpin |
|
3,467 |
|
4,276 | ||
Total net revenues |
|
16,705 |
|
18,856 | ||
Costs and expenses |
||||||
Lodge |
|
9,445 |
|
10,052 | ||
Gilpin |
|
3,102 |
|
3,353 | ||
Total costs and expenses |
|
12,547 |
|
13,405 | ||
EBITDA |
||||||
Lodge |
|
3,793 |
|
4,528 | ||
Gilpin |
|
365 |
|
923 | ||
EBITDA |
$ |
4,158 |
$ |
5,451 | ||
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure to operating income, a GAAP financial measure.
Reconciliation of EBITDA to operating income
Three months ended March 31, 2003 |
EBITDA |
Depreciation and |
Operating | ||||||
Lodge |
$ |
3,793 |
$ |
811 |
$ |
2,982 | |||
Gilpin |
|
365 |
|
292 |
|
73 | |||
TOTAL |
$ |
4,158 |
$ |
1,103 |
$ |
3,055 | |||
Three months ended March 31, 2002 |
EBITDA |
Depreciation and |
Operating | ||||||
Lodge |
$ |
4,528 |
$ |
1,721 |
$ |
2,807 | |||
Gilpin |
|
923 |
|
725 |
|
198 | |||
TOTAL |
$ |
5,451 |
$ |
2,446 |
$ |
3,005 | |||
26
Increased Competition in the Black Hawk Market
The competitive aspects of the market in Black Hawk continue to be a significant factor in our operations. Approximately 1,550 machines entered the market in 2000 with an additional 1,050 parking spaces. Further, in December of 2001 another property entered the market and opened with 1,320 devices and parking for 850 cars.
As a result of the increased level of development activity in Black Hawk over the last two years, there were approximately 9,600 gaming devices in the City at March 31, 2003. At March 31, 2003, we had approximately 1,330 devices in this market (940 at The Lodge and 390 at the Gilpin), which represented 14% of the total devices in the Black Hawk market.
At March 31, 2003 our gross gaming revenues at The Lodge and the Gilpin totaled $18.2 million ($16.0 million in net revenues) which represented 14.8% of the total gaming revenues in Black Hawk. While the overall market in the first quarter 2003 declined by 6.8%, in average total gaming devices declined by 1%. Notwithstanding the fact that the market supply has out-paced market demand during 2003, we managed to generate 106% efficiencies (our percentage of the gross gaming revenues divided by our percentage of the gaming devices) within the market for the first quarter of 2003. Management follows our efficiency levels very closely as we believe this to be a useful measure of how well we are performing within this market.
We expect some of our previous and existing market share to be lost to increased competition. As more properties continue to compete for their fair share of the market our personnel costs, marketing costs, and other costs will likely increase as we attempt to keep our market share.
Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the pro forma three months ended March 31, 2002
Net Revenues. The decrease in net revenues of our Colorado operations is attributable to a reduction in net revenue at the Gilpin of approximately $0.8 million or 18.9% and $1.3 million or 9.2% at the Lodge. Colorados operations have been impacted by increased competition during negative market growth in the first three months of 2003. In addition, we are currently engaged in an approximate $6.0 million expansion for the Gilpin, which commenced during the third quarter of 2002 and is expected to be completed in June 2003. While we believe this expansion will provide a more competitive single floor casino environment and enable us to more effectively compete with the newer and larger properties in the market, we expect our revenues to be negatively impacted during the remainder of the construction period.
Costs and Expenses. Total costs and expenses associated with our Colorado operations decreased $.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the same period of 2002. The decrease of $0.6 million in costs and expenses attributable to the Lodge was primarily comprised of reductions in labor, slot participation costs, gaming tax and the elimination of management fees. The decrease of $0.2 million in costs and expenses attributable to the Gilpin was also primarily comprised of reductions in labor, slot participation, and gaming taxes.
Nevada
Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to the pro forma three months ended March 31, 2002
As previously discussed, our Nevada operations consist of the Gold Dust, located in Reno, Nevada. The Gold Dust was acquired by BHWK on January 5, 2002. The property has 106 hotel rooms, which we offer to players, thereby enhancing their visit to the Reno area. The net revenues of the Gold Dust increased by $.3 million for the current three-month period over the comparable period of 2002. In September of 2001 we completed the installation of our slot player tracking system and we have been actively enrolling members into our slot players club. We believe this effort continues to increase play from our customers and accounts for the increase in our net revenues during the current quarter. Our costs and expenses increased by approximately $26,000 for the current three-month period compared to the comparable period of last year. As a result, our EBITDA at the Gold Dust for the first nine months of 2003 and 2002 is $1.4 million and $1.2 million respectively.
Louisiana
The Louisiana truck plaza video gaming properties consist of six truck plaza gaming facilities located in Louisiana and a share in the gaming revenues of an additional truck plaza. The acquisition dates of each of the respective truck stops are discussed previously.
27
Each truck plaza features a convenience store, fueling operations, a 24-hour restaurant and 50 video gaming devices (except for Lucky Magnolia Truck Stop and Casino which has 40 video gaming devices).
The Louisiana truck plazas revenues are comprised of (i) revenue from video poker gaming machines; (ii) sales of gasoline and diesel fuel; (iii) sales of groceries, trucker supplies and sundry items through their convenience stores; (iv) sales of food and beverages in their restaurants and bars; and (v) miscellaneous commissions on ATMs, pay phones and lottery sales.
All video poker activity is reported instantaneously via a computer phone line directly to the Louisiana State Police. The Louisiana truck plazas revenues are heavily dependent on meeting the minimum gallons of fuel sales requirements necessary to operate video poker gaming machines in Louisiana. These requirements must be complied with on a quarterly basis. In the event of noncompliance, the Louisiana State Police must turn off a portion of the video poker machines. The Louisiana truck plazas believe that they will continue to meet the fuel sales requirements necessary to operate video poker gaming machines in Louisiana at current levels.
Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to the pro forma three months ended March 31, 2002
Net revenues. The Louisiana truck plazas generated net revenues of $12.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $10.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002. This increase is due to increased fuel sales and video poker revenue.
Costs and Expenses. The Louisiana truck plazas costs and expenses were $9.4 million and $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively. The increase in costs and expenses are related primarily to costs associated with the increased fuel sales and video poker revenue.
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization. The Louisiana truck plazas EBITDA was $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $2.8 million for the same period in 2002, resulting in an increase in EBITDA of $.5 million.
Virginia
Colonial Holdings revenues are comprised of (i) pari-mutuel commissions from wagering on races broadcast from out-of-state racetracks to Colonials off-track wagering facilities and the track using import simulcasting; (ii) wagering at the track and Colonials off-track wagering facilities on its live races; (iii) admission fees, program and racing form sales, and certain other ancillary activities; and (iv) net income from food and beverage sales and concessions.
Colonials revenues are heavily dependent on the operations of its off-track wagering facilities. Revenues from the off-track wagering facilities help support live racing at the track. The amount of revenue Colonial earns from each wager depends on where the race is run and where the wagering takes place. Revenues from import simulcasting of out-of-state races and from wagering at the track and at the off-track wagering facilities on races run at the track consist of the total amount wagered at Colonials facilities, less the amount paid as winning wagers. The percentage of each dollar wagered on horse races that must be returned to the public as winning wagers (typically about 79%) is legislated by the state in which a race takes place. Revenues from export simulcasting consists of amounts payable to Colonial by the out-of-state racetracks and their simulcast facilities with respect to wagering on races run at the track.
28
Results of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to the pro forma three months ended March 31, 2002
Total Revenues. Colonial generated net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003 of $7.3 million compared to $6.9 million for the same period of 2002. The increase of total revenues of $.4 million, or 5%, is due primarily an increase in amounts wagered at Colonials off-track wagering facilities.
Costs and expenses. Colonials direct operating costs and expenses were $6.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $6.0 million for the same period of 2002. Costs and expenses increased $.4 million, or 6%, for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from the same period of 2002. The cost increases were primarily due to the increase in costs associated with increased wagering and printing costs.
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization. Colonials EBITDA was $.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 respectively.
Corporate Overhead
Costs and expenses. Corporate overhead costs and expenses decreased $3.9 million from $5.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002 to $1.2 million in the comparable period of 2003. The decrease is primarily attributable to transaction related non-recurring privatization costs and expenses of $4,162 which included a $3,165 charge related to the redemption of outstanding stock options of Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc. and $997 in accounting, legal and other expenses. These costs were offset by $0.3 million in increases attributable to charitable contributions of $0.1 million and additional accounting costs of $0.2 million.
29
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices. On February 8, 2002 we issued $125.0 million in 11 7/8 % senior secured notes due in 2009. The proceeds of these notes were used to finance our recent acquisitions and for working capital purposes. Substantially all of our debt bears interest at a fixed rate, except our $10,000 senior credit facility (which has $2,500 outstanding as of March 31, 2003), which bears interest at 1.75% above the prime rate published by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
If market interest rates increase, our cash requirements for interest on the senior credit facility balance would also increase. Conversely, if market interest rates decrease, our cash requirements for interest on the senior credit facility balance would also decrease.
The annual increase or decrease in cash requirements for Interest should market rates increase or decrease by 10% compared to interest rate levels at March 31, 2003 would be approximately $16 thousand.
We currently do not invest in derivative financial instruments, interest rate swaps or other similar investments to alter interest rate exposure
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of March 31, 2003, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2003. There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to March 31, 2003.
30
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
On May 25, 2001, a lawsuit was filed in The United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Case No. 01-D-0964) (MJW) by Central City, several casino operators located in Central City and others against the City of Black Hawk, the Black Hawk Gaming Association (formerly the Black Hawk Casino Owners Association) and several casino operators located in the City of Black Hawk, including Black Hawk. The suit alleges that the defendants caused economic harm to the plaintiffs by engaging in a conspiracy and scheme to harm competition, restrain trade and monopolize the gaming industry in the Gilpin County, Colorado market in violation of federal and state constitutional, statutory and common law. Also, the complaint alleges that starting in 1996 the City of Black Hawk began interfering in Central Citys plans to construct a road directly from Interstate 70 to Central City. The plaintiffs seek compensatory, treble and exemplary damages against the defendants in amounts to be proven at trial along with interest, costs and attorneys fees. According to news reports, on March 13, 2003, Central Citys city council voted to withdraw from the lawsuit. Central City has since sought to be dismissed from the lawsuit, but to date has not yet been dismissed. Also according to news reports, the remaining plaintiffs intend to continue the lawsuit. On March 26, 2003, the district court entered an order dismissing with prejudice the plaintiffs seventh, eighth, eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth claims for relief (i.e., the state common law claims and the claims under RICO and its Colorado statutory counterpart (COCCA)). The court set a further hearing on the motions to dismiss the state and federal antitrust claims, to be held June 13, 2003. We believe that this lawsuit is without merit and we intend to contest it vigorously. We are unable to reasonably estimate the amount or range of amounts, if any associated with this litigation. However, the Company does not believe the suit will result in any material liability.
In March 2003, Galactic Gaming, Inc., one of the Plaintiffs in Case No. 01-D-0964 (MJW), filed an action in District Court in Jefferson County, Colorado, Case No. 03CV0793, Division 7, against many of the same defendants as in Case No. 01-D-0964 (MJW), including Black Hawk Gaming. That state court action asserts state common law claims identical or virtually identical to those that were asserted and dismissed with prejudice in the federal action. Defendants have moved to dismiss the state court action on res judicata grounds. That motion is pending. We believe that this state court action is without merit and intend to contest it vigorously. We are unable to reasonably estimate the amount or range of amounts, if any associated with this litigation. However, the Company does not believe the suit will result in any material liability.
On June 25, 1999, a complaint against the Lodge and John Does 1-3 was filed by a casino operating downstream from these casinos. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the plaintiff is being damaged by subsurface water flows onto its property from the Lodge property and the properties of John Does 1-3. The Lodge has denied all liability and has turned the matter over to its insurance carrier for defense. The Company does not believe the suit has merit and will continue to defend against the allegations alleged by the plaintiff. We are unable to reasonably estimate the amount or range of amounts, if any associated with this litigation. However, the Company does not believe the suit will result in any material liability.
The Company is involved in routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. These matters are believed by the Company to be covered by appropriate insurance policies.
31
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not Applicable
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference to other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(a) Exhibits |
||
*3.1 |
Certificate of Incorporation of Gameco, Inc. | |
*3.2 |
By-Laws of Gameco, Inc. | |
+3.3 |
Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Gameco, Inc. | |
+4.1 |
Loan and Security Agreement dated July 12, 2002 by and among Jacobs Entertainment, Inc., certain subsidiaries and Foothill Capital Corporation. | |
+4.2 |
Promissory Note dated July 12, 2002 by and among Jacobs Entertainment, Inc., certain borrowers and Foothill Capital Corporation. | |
+4.3 |
Guaranty of Gold Dust West Casino, Inc. and Diversified Opportunities Group Ltd. dated July 12, 2002. | |
+4.4 |
Intercreditor Agreement dated July 12, 2002 by and between Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association and Foothill Capital Corporation | |
+4.5 |
Memorandum of Intercreditor Agreement dated July 12, 2002 by and among Foothill Capital Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association and Borrowers. | |
+4.6 |
Fee and Leasehold Deed of Trust, Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing by Black Hawk Gaming & Development Company, Inc., Black Hawk/Jacobs Entertainment, LLC, and Gilpin Hotel Venture to the Public Trustee of Gilpin County, State of Colorado and Foothill Capital Corporation, dated July 12, 2002. | |
*21.1 |
Subsidiaries of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. | |
99.1 |
Significant guarantor information. | |
99.2 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | |
99.3 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
* | Incorporated herein by reference from our registration statement on Form S-4 (SEC Registration No. 333-88242), Part II, Item 21, filed on May 14, 2002. |
+ | Incorporated herein by reference from Amendment No. 1 of our registration statement on Form S-4 (SEC Registration No. 333-88242), Part II, Item 21, filed on August 8, 2002. |
(b) | No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the reporting period. |
32
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
JACOBS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. | ||||||||
Registrant | ||||||||
Date: May 9, 2003 |
By: |
/s/ JEFFREY P. JACOBS | ||||||
Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||
/s/ STEPHEN R. ROARK | ||||||||
Stephen R. Roark, Chief Financial Officer |
33
I, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a. | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b. | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c. | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a. | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b. | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: May 9, 2003
/s/ JEFFREY P. JACOBS |
Jeffrey P. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer and |
34
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Stephen R. Roark, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jacobs Entertainment, Inc. |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a. | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b. | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c. | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
d. | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
e. | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: May 9, 2003
/s/ STEPHEN R. ROARK |
Stephen R. Roark, Chief Financial Officer |
35