UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
{X} |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended |
June 30, 2004 |
OR
{ } | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from | _______________________________ to ______________________________ |
Commission file number |
001-12917 |
Wellsford Real Properties, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland
(State of Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
13-3926898 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
535 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 838-3400
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |
Yes | X |
No |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). |
Yes | X |
No |
The number of the registrants shares of common stock outstanding was 6,460,770 as of August 3, 2004 (including 169,903 shares of class A-1 common stock). |
Page Number | ||||
PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION: | |||
Item 1. |
Financial Statements | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2004 (unaudited) and December 31, 2003 |
3 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
4 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
5 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) |
6 | |||
Item 2. |
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
21 | ||
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 35 | ||
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures | 36 | ||
PART II. |
OTHER INFORMATION: | |||
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings | 36 | ||
Item 3. |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 36 | ||
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 36 | ||
Item 6. |
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 37 | ||
Signatures |
39 | |||
Exhibits |
40 |
- 2 -
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Real estate assets, at cost: | ||||||||
Land | $ | 18,735,969 | $ | 18,735,969 | ||||
Buildings and improvements | 113,558,562 | 113,556,952 | ||||||
132,294,531 | 132,292,921 | |||||||
Less: | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation | (18,902,477 | ) | (16,774,867 | ) | ||||
113,392,054 | 115,518,054 | |||||||
Residential units available for sale | 4,171,789 | 9,235,970 | ||||||
Land held for development | 12,769,240 | 5,828,453 | ||||||
130,333,083 | 130,582,477 | |||||||
Note receivable | 2,064,000 | 3,096,000 | ||||||
Asset held for sale | -- | 2,334,535 | ||||||
Investment in joint ventures | 47,593,602 | 53,759,723 | ||||||
Total real estate and investments | 179,990,685 | 189,772,735 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 52,094,824 | 55,377,515 | ||||||
Restricted cash and investments | 10,653,373 | 10,210,405 | ||||||
Investments in U.S. Government securities | 30,062,821 | 27,516,211 | ||||||
Prepaid and other assets | 2,528,677 | 2,950,260 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 275,330,380 | $ | 285,827,126 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Mortgage notes payable | $ | 108,771,294 | $ | 109,504,562 | ||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 25,775,000 | -- | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities, including the liability for | ||||||||
deferred compensation of $10,356,293 and $9,748,487 | 15,820,668 | 16,283,419 | ||||||
Liabilities attributable to assets held for sale | -- | 317,486 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 150,366,962 | 126,105,467 | ||||||
Company-obligated, mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred | ||||||||
securities of WRP Convertible Trust I, holding solely 8.25% | ||||||||
junior subordinated debentures of Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. | ||||||||
("Convertible Trust Preferred Securities") | -- | 25,000,000 | ||||||
Minority interests | 3,403,768 | 3,447,615 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
Shareholders' equity: | ||||||||
Series A 8% convertible redeemable preferred stock, $.01 par value | ||||||||
per share, 2,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and | ||||||||
outstanding | -- | -- | ||||||
Common stock, 98,825,000 shares authorized, $.02 par value per | ||||||||
share - 6,289,835 and 6,286,091 shares issued and outstanding | 125,797 | 125,722 | ||||||
Class A-1 common stock, 175,000 shares authorized, $.02 par value | ||||||||
per share - 169,903 shares issued and outstanding | 3,398 | 3,398 | ||||||
Paid in capital in excess of par value | 162,754,288 | 162,736,723 | ||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) | (35,074,699 | ) | (25,242,236 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss; share of unrealized loss on | ||||||||
interest rate protection contract purchased by joint venture | ||||||||
investment, net of income tax benefit | -- | (50,429 | ) | |||||
Treasury stock, 302,062 and 305,249 shares | (6,249,134 | ) | (6,299,134 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders' equity | 121,559,650 | 131,274,044 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 275,330,380 | $ | 285,827,126 | ||||
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- 3 -
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
REVENUES | ||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 3,416,915 | $ | 3,592,216 | $ | 6,777,179 | $ | 7,506,325 | ||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | 4,657,978 | 2,461,139 | 6,944,194 | 3,657,139 | ||||||||||
Interest revenue | 241,047 | 941,107 | 490,698 | 1,899,150 | ||||||||||
Fee revenue | 224,133 | 313,172 | 494,736 | 878,570 | ||||||||||
Total revenues | 8,540,073 | 7,307,634 | 14,706,807 | 13,941,184 | ||||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | 3,855,848 | 2,125,977 | 5,770,373 | 3,180,731 | ||||||||||
Property operating and maintenance | 1,203,752 | 1,311,937 | 2,277,707 | 2,282,987 | ||||||||||
Real estate taxes | 371,879 | 374,971 | 727,645 | 705,966 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,138,098 | 1,208,605 | 2,275,719 | 3,434,821 | ||||||||||
Property management | 82,937 | 73,364 | 166,052 | 151,287 | ||||||||||
Interest: | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage notes payable | 1,626,851 | 1,668,659 | 3,288,171 | 3,253,746 | ||||||||||
Junior subordinated debentures | 508,969 | -- | 1,049,907 | -- | ||||||||||
General and administrative | 1,785,694 | 1,414,875 | 3,598,826 | 2,925,078 | ||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 10,574,028 | 8,178,388 | 19,154,400 | 15,934,616 | ||||||||||
(Loss) income from joint ventures | (1,014,438 | ) | (175,314 | ) | (6,106,031 | ) | 2,409,901 | |||||||
(Loss) income before minority interest, income taxes, | ||||||||||||||
accrued distributions and amortization of costs on | ||||||||||||||
Convertible Trust Preferred Securities and | ||||||||||||||
discontinued operations | (3,048,393 | ) | (1,046,068 | ) | (10,553,624 | ) | 416,469 | |||||||
Minority interest benefit | 4,362 | 47,124 | 43,847 | 41,349 | ||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes, accrued | ||||||||||||||
distributions and amortization of costs on Convertible | ||||||||||||||
Trust Preferred Securities and discontinued operations | (3,044,031 | ) | (998,944 | ) | (10,509,777 | ) | 457,818 | |||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 59,000 | (467,000 | ) | 99,000 | 214,000 | |||||||||
(Loss) income before accrued distributions and | ||||||||||||||
amortization of costs on Convertible Trust Preferred | ||||||||||||||
Securities and discontinued operations | (3,103,031 | ) | (531,944 | ) | (10,608,777 | ) | 243,818 | |||||||
Accrued distributions and amortization of costs on | ||||||||||||||
Convertible Trust Preferred Securities, net of income | ||||||||||||||
tax benefit of $30,000 and $210,000 in 2003, | ||||||||||||||
respectively | -- | 494,953 | -- | 839,907 | ||||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations | (3,103,031 | ) | (1,026,897 | ) | (10,608,777 | ) | (596,089 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of | ||||||||||||||
income tax expense (benefit) of $17,000, ($13,000), | ||||||||||||||
$17,000 and $10,000, respectively | 789,461 | (5,542 | ) | 776,314 | 39,932 | |||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (2,313,570 | ) | $ | (1,032,439 | ) | $ | (9,832,463 | ) | $ | (556,157 | ) | ||
Per share amounts, basic and diluted: | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations | $ | (0.48 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (1.64 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||
Income from discontinued operations | 0.12 | -- | 0.12 | 0.01 | ||||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (0.36 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted | 6,459,738 | 6,453,730 | 6,458,635 | 6,452,916 | ||||||||||
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- 4 -
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (9,832,463 | ) | $ | (556,157 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash provided by | ||||||||
operating activities: | ||||||||
Share of impairment charges from investment in joint | ||||||||
ventures | 6,605,734 | -- | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets and release of contingent liability . | (808,856 | ) | -- | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,294,376 | 3,453,478 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred compensation | -- | 151,331 | ||||||
Net amortization of premiums/discounts on U.S. Government | ||||||||
securities | 11,494 | -- | ||||||
Distributions (less than) joint venture income | (187,911 | ) | (1,322,552 | ) | ||||
Undistributed minority interest (benefit) | (43,847 | ) | (41,349 | ) | ||||
Shares issued for director compensation | 32,000 | 48,000 | ||||||
Value of option grants for director compensation | 65,628 | -- | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Restricted cash and investments | (442,968 | ) | 131,134 | |||||
Residential units available for sale | 5,064,181 | 2,731,838 | ||||||
Assets held for sale | 449,057 | (22,033 | ) | |||||
Prepaid and other assets | 341,003 | 922,132 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | (528,379 | ) | (1,374,017 | ) | ||||
Liabilities attributable to assets held for sale | (317,486 | ) | (52,637 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 2,701,563 | 4,069,168 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Investments in real estate assets | (1,610 | ) | (9,379 | ) | ||||
Investments in land held for development | (6,940,787 | ) | -- | |||||
Return of capital from investments in joint ventures | 487,541 | -- | ||||||
Purchase of U.S. Government securities | (2,558,104 | ) | -- | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of real estate assets | 2,694,334 | -- | ||||||
Repayments of notes receivable | 1,032,000 | 516,000 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (5,286,626 | ) | 506,621 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Borrowing from mortgage notes payable | -- | 40,000,000 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs | -- | (326,881 | ) | |||||
Repayments of mortgage notes payable | (733,268 | ) | (42,029,690 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from option exercises | 35,640 | -- | ||||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities | (697,628 | ) | (2,356,571 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (3,282,691 | ) | 2,219,218 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 55,377,515 | 38,581,841 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 52,094,824 | $ | 40,801,059 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest, including amounts | ||||||||
capitalized of $28,463 in 2004 | $ | 4,309,286 | $ | 3,266,993 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of tax refunds | $ | 240,333 | $ | 34,412 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND | ||||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Release of shares held in deferred compensation plan | $ | 50,000 | $ | 75,000 | ||||
Other comprehensive income; share of unrealized income on | ||||||||
interest rate protection contract purchased by joint | ||||||||
venture investment, net of tax | $ | 50,429 | $ | 152,611 | ||||
The effect of deconsolidating $25,000,000 of Convertible | ||||||||
Trust Preferred Securities and recording $25,775,000 of | ||||||||
junior subordinated debentures and related joint venture | ||||||||
investment | $ | 775,000 | ||||||
See notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
- 5 -
1. Organization and Business
Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. (and subsidiaries, collectively the "Company") was formed as a Maryland corporation on January 8, 1997, as a corporate subsidiary of Wellsford Residential Property Trust (the "Trust"). On May 30, 1997, the Trust merged (the "Merger") with Equity Residential Properties Trust ("EQR"). Immediately prior to the Merger, the Trust contributed certain of its assets to the Company and the Company assumed certain liabilities of the Trust. Immediately after the contribution of assets to the Company and immediately prior to the Merger, the Trust distributed to its common shareholders all the outstanding shares of the Company owned by the Trust (the "Spin-off"). On June 2, 1997, the Company sold 6,000,000 shares of its common stock in a private placement to a group of institutional investors at $20.60 per share, the Company's then book value per share.
The Company is a real estate merchant banking firm headquartered in New York City which acquires, develops, finances and operates real properties and organizes and invests in private and public real estate companies. The Company has established three strategic business units ("SBUs") within which it executes its business plan: (i) Commercial Property Investments which are held in the Company's subsidiary, Wellsford Commercial Properties Trust ("WCPT"), through its ownership interest in Wellsford/Whitehall Group, L.L.C. ("Wellsford/Whitehall"); (ii) Debt and Equity Investments - Wellsford Capital SBU; and (iii) Property Development and Land Investments - Wellsford Development SBU.
During March 2004, the Company's Board of Directors authorized and retained the investment banking firm of Lazard Fréres & Co. LLC to advise the Company on various strategic financial and business alternatives available to it to maximize shareholder value. These may include a recapitalization, acquisitions, dispositions of assets, a liquidation, the sale or merger of the Company and alternatives that would keep the Company independent. There is no assurance as to which, if any, of the aforementioned alternatives may occur.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Financial Statement Presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Investments in entities where the Company does not have a controlling interest are accounted for under the equity method of accounting. These investments are initially recorded at cost and are subsequently adjusted for the Company's proportionate share of the investment's income (loss) and additional contributions or distributions. Investments in entities where the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for under the cost method. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions among the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the assets and liabilities contributed to and assumed by the Company from the Trust, from the time such assets and liabilities were acquired or incurred, respectively, by the Trust. Such financial statements have been prepared using the historical basis of the assets and liabilities and the historical results of operations related to the Company's assets and liabilities.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes of the Company have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared under generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been included and are of a normal and recurring
- 6 -
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
nature. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2004. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are not necessarily indicative of a full year results.
Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recently Issued Pronouncements. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46 "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"). A Variable Interest Entity ("VIE") is created when (i) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity from financing its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties or (ii) equity holders either (a) lack direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity, (b) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity or (c) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE, pursuant to FIN 46, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses or receives a majority of the residual returns of the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. The provisions of FIN 46 are effective immediately for variable interest entities formed or acquired after January 31, 2003 and in the period ending after December 15, 2003 for variable interest entities in which the Company held an interest before February 1, 2003.
The Company has three variable interest entities, one of which is consolidated and two which are not under the provisions of FIN 46. During the first quarter of 2004, based on the provisions of FIN 46, the Company was required to deconsolidate the entity which issued the Convertible Trust Preferred Securities. The provisions of FIN 46 do not allow for a reclassification of prior period presentations to conform with the current period presentation. As a result of deconsolidation, the Company recorded its $775,000 voting equity interest in WRP Convertible Trust I as an investment in joint ventures. WRP Convertible Trust I holds $25,775,000 of 8.25% junior subordinated debentures (the "Debentures") of the Company, which is included in total liabilities at June 30, 2004 on the balance sheet, rather than the $25,000,000 of previously reported Convertible Trust Preferred Securities. The $775,000 voting equity interest had previously been eliminated in consolidation. The expense of $509,000 and $1,050,000 for the Debentures and related cost amortization is included in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. The expense for the comparable prior periods is included in accrued distributions and amortization of costs on Convertible Trust Preferred Securities on the statement of operations and reported net of taxes. There is no impact on the cash flows of the Company upon adoption.
Reclassification. Amounts in certain accounts in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and certain tables in the footnote disclosures have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation, except as described above, primarily as a result of the presentation requirements for assets classified as held for sale during 2003.
- 7 -
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
As previously reported in Footnote 15 of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, previously reported income and per share amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 were adjusted to reflect adjustments subsequently recorded by Wellsford/Whitehall as follows:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2003 |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Loss) income from joint ventures as previously reported | $ | (790,177 | ) | $ | 2,335,295 | |||
Adjustment | 614,863 | 74,606 | ||||||
(Loss) income from joint ventures as adjusted | $ | (175,314 | ) | $ | 2,409,901 | |||
Net (loss) as previously reported | $ | (1,438,302 | ) | $ | (605,763 | ) | ||
Adjustment | 405,863 | 49,606 | ||||||
Net (loss) as adjusted | $ | (1,032,439 | ) | $ | (556,157 | ) | ||
Net (loss) per share as previously reported | $ | (0.22 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Adjustment | 0.06 | -- | ||||||
Net (loss) per share as adjusted | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
- 8 -
3. Segment Information
The Company's operations are organized into three SBUs. The following tables present condensed balance sheet and operating data for these SBUs:
(amounts in thousands) | Commercial Property Investments |
Debt and Equity Investments |
Property Development and Land Investments |
Other* |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 30, 2004 |
|||||||||||||||||
Investment properties: | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate held for investment, net | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 113,392 | $ | -- | $ | 113,392 | |||||||
Residential units available for sale | -- | -- | 4,172 | -- | 4,172 | ||||||||||||
Land held for development | -- | 478 | 12,291 | -- | 12,769 | ||||||||||||
Real estate, net | -- | 478 | 129,855 | -- | 130,333 | ||||||||||||
Note receivable | -- | 2,064 | -- | -- | 2,064 | ||||||||||||
Investment in joint ventures | 14,199 | 32,620 | -- | 775 | 47,594 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | -- | 5,505 | 1,138 | 45,452 | 52,095 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash and investments | -- | 193 | 104 | 10,356 | 10,653 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government securities | -- | -- | -- | 30,063 | 30,063 | ||||||||||||
Prepaid and other assets | -- | 358 | 1,266 | 904 | 2,528 | ||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 14,199 | $ | 41,218 | $ | 132,363 | $ | 87,550 | $ | 275,330 | |||||||
Mortgage notes payable | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 108,771 | $ | -- | $ | 108,771 | |||||||
Debentures | -- | -- | -- | 25,775 | 25,775 | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | -- | 76 | 2,233 | 13,512 | 15,821 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest | -- | 64 | 3,339 | -- | 3,403 | ||||||||||||
Equity | 14,199 | 41,078 | 18,020 | 48,263 | 121,560 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 14,199 | $ | 41,218 | $ | 132,363 | $ | 87,550 | $ | 275,330 | |||||||
December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment properties: | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate held for investment, net | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 115,518 | $ | -- | $ | 115,518 | |||||||
Residential units available for sale | -- | -- | 9,236 | -- | 9,236 | ||||||||||||
Land held for development | -- | 389 | 5,439 | -- | 5,828 | ||||||||||||
Real estate, net | -- | 389 | 130,193 | -- | 130,582 | ||||||||||||
Note receivable | -- | 3,096 | -- | -- | 3,096 | ||||||||||||
Asset held for sale** | -- | 2,335 | -- | -- | 2,335 | ||||||||||||
Investment in joint ventures | 14,616 | 39,144 | -- | -- | 53,760 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | -- | 6,635 | 551 | 48,192 | 55,378 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash and investments | -- | -- | 462 | 9,748 | 10,210 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government securities | -- | -- | -- | 27,516 | 27,516 | ||||||||||||
Prepaid and other assets | -- | 561 | 1,386 | 1,003 | 2,950 | ||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 14,616 | $ | 52,160 | $ | 132,592 | $ | 86,459 | $ | 285,827 | |||||||
Mortgage notes payable | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 109,505 | $ | -- | $ | 109,505 | |||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | -- | 41 | 2,815 | 13,427 | 16,283 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities attributable to asset | |||||||||||||||||
held for sale** | -- | 317 | -- | -- | 317 | ||||||||||||
Convertible Trust Preferred Securities | -- | -- | -- | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest | -- | 95 | 3,353 | -- | 3,448 | ||||||||||||
Equity | 14,616 | 51,707 | 16,919 | 48,032 | 131,274 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 14,616 | $ | 52,160 | $ | 132,592 | $ | 86,459 | $ | 285,827 | |||||||
* | Includes corporate cash, restricted cash and investments, U.S. Government securities, investment in WRP Convertible Trust I, other assets, accrued expenses and other liabilities that have not been allocated to the operating segments. |
** | Asset held for sale in the Debt and Equity Investments SBU is net of the remaining impairment reserve of $2,153 at December 31, 2003. |
- 9 -
Segment Information (continued)
(amounts in thousands) | Commercial Property Investments |
Debt and Equity Investments |
Property Development and Land Investments |
Other* |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|||||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 3,417 | $ | -- | $ | 3,417 | |||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | -- | -- | 4,658 | -- | 4,658 | ||||||||||||
Interest revenue | -- | 47 | -- | 194 | 241 | ||||||||||||
Fee revenue | -- | 224 | -- | -- | 224 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | -- | 271 | 8,075 | 194 | 8,540 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | -- | -- | 3,855 | -- | 3,855 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | -- | 16 | 1,644 | -- | 1,660 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | -- | 43 | 1,079 | 16 | 1,138 | ||||||||||||
Interest: | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage notes payable | -- | (7 | ) | 1,361 | 273 | 1,627 | |||||||||||
Debentures | -- | -- | -- | 509 | 509 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | -- | -- | -- | 1,786 | 1,786 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | -- | 52 | 7,939 | 2,584 | 10,575 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from joint ventures | (1,603 | ) | 589 | -- | -- | (1,014 | ) | ||||||||||
Minority interest benefit (expense) | -- | 15 | (10 | ) | -- | 5 | |||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes and | |||||||||||||||||
discontinued operations | $ | (1,603 | ) | $ | 823 | $ | 126 | $ | (2,390 | ) | $ | (3,044 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||||
before income tax expense | $ | -- | $ | 806 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 806 | |||||||
For the Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 3,592 | $ | -- | $ | 3,592 | |||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | -- | -- | 2,461 | -- | 2,461 | ||||||||||||
Interest revenue | -- | 826 | -- | 116 | 942 | ||||||||||||
Fee revenue | -- | 233 | (4 | ) | 84 | 313 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | -- | 1,059 | 6,049 | 200 | 7,308 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | -- | -- | 2,126 | -- | 2,126 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | -- | -- | 1,760 | -- | 1,760 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 76 | 2 | 1,112 | 19 | 1,209 | ||||||||||||
Interest | -- | -- | 1,575 | 94 | 1,669 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | -- | 6 | -- | 1,409 | 1,415 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 76 | 8 | 6,573 | 1,522 | 8,179 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from joint ventures | (632 | ) | 457 | -- | -- | (175 | ) | ||||||||||
Minority interest benefit | -- | -- | 47 | -- | 47 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes, | |||||||||||||||||
accrued distributions and | |||||||||||||||||
amortization of costs on Convertible | |||||||||||||||||
Trust Preferred Securities and | |||||||||||||||||
discontinued operations | $ | (708 | ) | $ | 1,508 | $ | (477 | ) | $ | (1,322 | ) | $ | (999 | ) | |||
(Loss) from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||||
before income tax expense | $ | -- | $ | (19 | ) | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | (19 | ) | |||||
* | Includes interest revenue, fee revenue, depreciation and amortization expense, interest expense and general and administrative expenses that have not been allocated to the operating segments. |
- 10 -
Segment Information (continued)
(amounts in thousands) | Commercial Property Investments |
Debt and Equity Investments |
Property Development and Land Investments |
Other* |
Consolidated | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|||||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 6,777 | $ | -- | $ | 6,777 | |||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | -- | -- | 6,944 | -- | 6,944 | ||||||||||||
Interest revenue | -- | 93 | -- | 398 | 491 | ||||||||||||
Fee revenue | -- | 449 | -- | 46 | 495 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | -- | 542 | 13,721 | 444 | 14,707 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | -- | -- | 5,770 | -- | 5,770 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | -- | 31 | 3,141 | -- | 3,172 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | -- | 86 | 2,158 | 32 | 2,276 | ||||||||||||
Interest: | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage notes payable | -- | (13 | ) | 2,794 | 507 | 3,288 | |||||||||||
Debentures | -- | -- | -- | 1,050 | 1,050 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | -- | 4 | -- | 3,595 | 3,599 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | -- | 108 | 13,863 | 5,184 | 19,155 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) from joint ventures | (467 | ) | (5,639 | ) | -- | -- | (6,106 | ) | |||||||||
Minority interest benefit | -- | 30 | 14 | -- | 44 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) before income taxes and | |||||||||||||||||
discontinued operations | $ | (467 | ) | $ | (5,175 | ) | $ | (128 | ) | $ | (4,740 | ) | $ | (10,510 | ) | ||
Income from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||||
before income tax expense | $ | -- | $ | 793 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 793 | |||||||
For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 7,506 | $ | -- | $ | 7,506 | |||||||
Revenue from sales of residential units | -- | -- | 3,657 | -- | 3,657 | ||||||||||||
Interest revenue | -- | 1,672 | -- | 227 | 1,899 | ||||||||||||
Fee revenue | -- | 459 | (10 | ) | 430 | 879 | |||||||||||
Total revenues | -- | 2,131 | 11,153 | 657 | 13,941 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales of residential units | -- | -- | 3,181 | -- | 3,181 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | -- | -- | 3,140 | -- | 3,140 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,171 | 3 | 2,223 | 37 | 3,434 | ||||||||||||
Interest | -- | -- | 3,086 | 168 | 3,254 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | -- | 17 | -- | 2,908 | 2,925 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses | 1,171 | 20 | 11,630 | 3,113 | 15,934 | ||||||||||||
Income from joint ventures | 1,513 | 897 | -- | -- | 2,410 | ||||||||||||
Minority interest benefit | -- | -- | 41 | -- | 41 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes, | |||||||||||||||||
accrued distributions and | |||||||||||||||||
amortization of costs on Convertible | |||||||||||||||||
Trust Preferred Securities and | |||||||||||||||||
discontinued operations | $ | 342 | $ | 3,008 | $ | (436 | ) | $ | (2,456 | ) | $ | 458 | |||||
Income from discontinued operations | |||||||||||||||||
before income tax expense | $ | -- | $ | 50 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 50 | |||||||
* | Includes interest revenue, fee revenue, depreciation and amortization expense, interest expense and general and administrative expenses that have not been allocated to the operating segments. |
- 11 -
Segment Information (continued)
Commercial Property Investments - Wellsford/Whitehall
The Company's commercial property investments consist solely of its interest in Wellsford/Whitehall, a joint venture by and among the Company, various entities affiliated with the Whitehall Funds ("Whitehall"), private real estate funds sponsored by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. ("Goldman Sachs") and a family based in New England (the "Family"). The Company had a 32.59% interest in Wellsford/Whitehall as of June 30, 2004. The manager of the joint venture is a Goldman Sachs and Whitehall affiliate.
The Company's investment in Wellsford/Whitehall, which is accounted for on the equity method, was approximately $14,199,000 and $14,616,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The Company's share of the (loss) income from Wellsford/Whitehall was approximately $(1,603,000) and $(632,000) for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and $(467,000) and $1,513,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The following table details the changes in the Company's investment in Wellsford/Whitehall during the six months ended June 30, 2004:
Investment balance at January 1, 2004 | $ | 14,616,000 | |||
Contributions | -- | ||||
Distributions | -- | ||||
Share of: | |||||
(Loss) from continuing operations | (2,239,000 | ) | |||
Net gain from asset sale | 1,672,000 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations | 122,000 | ||||
Write-off of deferred debt costs and | |||||
prepayment penalties from debt pay-off upon | |||||
sale of assets | (22,000 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income | 50,000 | ||||
Investment balance at June 30, 2004 | $ | 14,199,000 | |||
The Company earned fees of approximately $84,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and $46,000 and $430,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, related to asset sales by Wellsford/Whitehall. No fees were earned during the three months ended June 30, 2004.
- 12 -
Segment Information (continued)
The following table presents condensed balance sheets and operating data for the Wellsford/Whitehall segment:
(amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Condensed Balance Sheet Data |
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||
Real estate, net | $ | 236,708 | $ | 236,143 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 9,075 | 11,607 | ||||||||||||
Assets held for sale | -- | 12,338 | ||||||||||||
Other assets | 20,502 | 17,032 | ||||||||||||
Total assets | 266,285 | 277,120 | ||||||||||||
Notes payable | 194,201 | 201,659 | ||||||||||||
Member's equity | 64,127 | 65,561 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | -- | (194 | ) | |||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
Condensed Operating Data |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | ||||||||||
Rental revenue | $ | 8,165 | $ | 10,121 | $ | 17,184 | $ | 20,707 | ||||||
Interest and other income | 85 | 118 | 1,122 | 266 | ||||||||||
Total revenues | 8,250 | 10,239 | 18,306 | 20,973 | ||||||||||
Operating expenses | 5,709 | 5,463 | 11,995 | 11,110 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,392 | 2,496 | 4,838 | 5,029 | ||||||||||
Interest | 4,648 | 3,012 | 7,876 | 5,885 | ||||||||||
General and administrative | 393 | 303 | 467 | 149 | ||||||||||
Total expenses | 13,142 | 11,274 | 25,176 | 22,173 | ||||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations | (4,892 | ) | (1,035 | ) | (6,870 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations | (28 | ) | (109 | ) | 375 | 1,636 | ||||||||
Net gain from asset sales | -- | 840 | 5,130 | 8,704 | ||||||||||
Write-off of deferred debt costs and prepayment | ||||||||||||||
penalties from debt pay-offs upon sales of | ||||||||||||||
assets | -- | (1,657 | ) | (68 | ) | (4,498 | ) | |||||||
Net (loss) income | $ | (4,920 | ) | $ | (1,961 | ) | $ | (1,433 | ) | $ | 4,642 | |||
At June 30, 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall owned and operated 24 properties (including 16 office properties, five net-leased retail properties and three land parcels) totaling approximately 2,664,000 square feet of improvements, primarily located in New Jersey and Massachusetts. During July 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall completed a transaction whereby six Massachusetts office properties aggregating 891,000 square feet were transferred to the Family in exchange for its interest in Wellsford/Whitehall and other consideration (see below).
Wellsford/Whitehall completed the sale of a 145,000 square foot building in Columbia, Maryland, for $18,400,000 during March 2004. The sales proceeds after expenses and the repayment of $6,900,000 of related debt, amounted to approximately $10,500,000 which were utilized by Wellsford/Whitehall for working capital purposes.
In July 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall completed a transaction whereby it transferred six of its Massachusetts properties (aggregating 891,000 square feet), which were subject to mortgage debt of $64,252,000 ("Nomura Loan") at June 30, 2004, along with related restricted cash balances aggregating $6,428,000, cash and certain other consideration to a newly formed partnership which includes the Family that owned an aggregate 7.45% equity interest in Wellsford/Whitehall (the "Family Partnership"), in exchange for the Family's equity interests in Wellsford/Whitehall. The Family also agreed to eliminate an existing tax indemnity which Wellsford/Whitehall had to the Family's members.
- 13 -
Segment Information (continued)
As a result of this transaction, Wellsford/Whitehall expects to record a loss of approximately $5,000,000 during the three months ending September 30, 2004, of which the Company's share is approximately $1,600,000. As a result of the redemption, the Company's interest in Wellsford/Whitehall will increase to 35.21%.
Since March 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall had not made a portion of its scheduled monthly debt service payments on the Nomura Loan. The manager of Wellsford/Whitehall withheld these debt service payments and met with the special servicer to present and discuss various potential debt term alternatives. The portion of the scheduled payments not being made related to the amount by which the debt service due each month exceeded the aggregate rent receipts of the above mentioned six properties, which were payable directly into a lockbox with the lender and were insufficient as a result of low occupancy at these properties. The special servicer has agreed to waive default interest in connection with the nonpayment and restructured the Nomura Loan with the Family Partnership which acquired the six properties as described above.
The property sold in March 2004 and the properties sold during 2003 have been reflected in discontinued operations and assets held for sale in the above summarized financial statements of Wellsford/Whitehall.
Wellsford/Whitehall executed an amended agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC") effective April 1, 2004, relating to the modification of the $106,000,000 loan (the "GECC Facility"). The amended agreement provides for an extension of the loan maturity to December 31, 2006, interest at LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum and a $16,000,000 line of credit to fund certain capital improvements, subject to certain conditions, through December 31, 2005. Excess cash flow, as defined, from the properties collateralizing the GECC Facility can only be used for capital expenditures for such properties. Wellsford/Whitehall was required to establish lock box arrangements for the deposit of all rent receipts relating to each of the properties collateralizing the GECC Facility. The loan is collateralized by eight office properties in New Jersey and one in Massachusetts.
During March 2004, the Company and Whitehall agreed to provide up to $8,000,000 to Wellsford/Whitehall through March 31, 2005 (of which the Company's share is 35%, or $2,800,000), however, there can be no assurance that this amount will be sufficient. At June 30, 2004, no amounts were advanced by either partner under this agreement.
A buy/sell agreement of equity interests between the Company and Whitehall can be exercised by either partner after December 31, 2003 with respect to the Wellsford/Whitehall venture (the "Buy/Sell Agreement"). The nature of the Buy/Sell Agreement allows for either the Whitehall funds, as a group, or the Company to provide notice that it intends to purchase the non-initiating partner's interest at a specific price per unit. The non-initiating partner may either accept that offer or instead may reject that offer and become the purchaser at the initially offered price. The terms of the Wellsford/Whitehall GECC Facility allow for the continuance of such debt as long as the Company or Whitehall has ultimate decision-making authority over the management and operations of Wellsford/Whitehall. As of the date of this report, neither partner has exercised its buy/sell right under the Buy/Sell Agreement.
Debt and Equity Investments - Wellsford Capital
At June 30, 2004, the Company had the following investments: (i) a direct debt investment of $2,064,000 which bore interest at 8.25% per annum during 2004 and has a maturity of December 31, 2005; (ii) approximately $25,829,000 of equity investments in companies which were organized to invest in debt instruments, including approximately $23,011,000 in Second Holding
- 14 -
Segment Information (continued)
Company, LLC ("Second Holding"), a company which was organized to purchase investment and non-investment grade rated real estate debt instruments and investment grade rated other asset-backed securities, and approximately $2,817,000 in Clairborne Fordham Tower, L.L.C. ("Clairborne Fordham"), a company organized to provide $34,000,000 of mezzanine financing for a highrise condominium project in Chicago; (iii) approximately $6,790,000 invested in Reis, a real estate information and database company; and (iv) a $450,000 loan to a venture organized to purchase land parcels for rezoning, subdivision and creation of environmental mitigation credits.
Second Holding
The Company accounts for its investment in Second Holding on the equity method of accounting as its interests are represented by two of eight board seats with one-quarter of the vote on any major business decisions. The Company's investment was approximately $23,011,000 and $29,167,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The Company's share of income (loss) from Second Holding was approximately $470,000 and $368,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and $(5,851,000) and $719,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The loss for the six months ended June 30, 2004 is the result of a $13,230,000 impairment charge taken by Second Holding (of which the Company's share was $6,759,000) related to the write-down of one of its investments during the first quarter of 2004 to its deemed fair value as a result of an other than temporary decline in the market value of the bonds and underlying aircraft collateral. The rating for this investment was downgraded to BBB+ from A- by Standard & Poor's during the first quarter of 2004. This investment was sold by Second Holding during May 2004 and Second Holding recorded a recovery of the impairment charge of $300,000 during the second quarter of 2004 (of which the Company's share was $153,000).
During the three months ended June 30, 2004, the partners of Second Holding agreed to cease making any distributions to its partners (including the partner who has a 35% income interest) until the impairment charge is recovered through future earnings.
The Company continues to earn and receive management fees for its role in analyzing real estate-related investments for Second Holding. The net fees earned by the Company, which are based upon the total assets of Second Holding, amounted to approximately $224,000 and $229,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and $449,000 and $449,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
- 15 -
Segment Information (continued)
The following table presents condensed balance sheets and operating data for Second Holding:
(amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Condensed Balance Sheet Data |
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 323,170 | $ | 133,389 | ||||||||||
Investments | 1,465,796 | 1,744,282 | ||||||||||||
Other assets (A) | 20,435 | 26,248 | ||||||||||||
Total assets | 1,809,401 | 1,903,919 | ||||||||||||
Medium-term notes (B) | 1,647,834 | 1,722,663 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt (C) | 110,902 | 115,038 | ||||||||||||
Total equity | 45,266 | 57,693 | ||||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
Condensed Operating Data |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | ||||||||||
Interest | $ | 9,012 | $ | 10,624 | $ | 18,471 | $ | 21,708 | ||||||
Total revenue | 9,012 | 10,624 | 18,471 | 21,708 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 7,205 | 8,277 | 14,525 | 17,080 | ||||||||||
Fees and other | 1,188 | 1,214 | 2,469 | 2,411 | ||||||||||
Impairment charge (credit) | (300 | ) | -- | 12,930 | -- | |||||||||
Total expenses | 8,093 | 9,491 | 29,924 | 19,491 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to members | $ | 919 | $ | 1,133 | $ | (11,453 | ) | $ | 2,217 | |||||
(A) | Other assets include an interest rate swap asset with a fair value of $12,621 and $16,900 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. |
(B) | At June 30, 2004, the net reported amount of medium-term notes includes the face amount of such notes of $1,650,000, offset by unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs of $2,166. At December 31, 2003, the net reported amount of medium-term notes included the face amount of such notes of $1,725,000, offset by net unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs of $2,337. |
(C) | Long-term debt outstanding is a privately placed ten-year junior subordinated bond-issue maturing April 2010, issued at a fixed rate of 7.96% per annum with a face amount of $100,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. The effect of fair value adjustments for the long-term debt (which is primarily an offset to the fair value of the interest rate swap asset as described in (A) above) was $12,621 and $16,900 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, net of unamortized debt issuance costs. |
During the second quarter of 2004, the partner owning the 35% income interest informed management of Second Holding that it would not approve the purchase of any further investments, thereby under the terms of the partnership agreement, preventing any future acquisitions of investments. The partners are evaluating alternatives available to Second Holding in addition to holding existing assets through respective maturities and then paying down related debt. As a consequence, operating income, fees to be earned and cash flows to be received by the Company from Second Holding will be reduced in the future.
The terms of the operating agreement of Second Holding provide for a buy/sell agreement between the Company and one of the venture partners, which could be exercised during the period September 23, 2004 through October 2, 2004. At this time, no determination can be made by the Company with regards to the outcome of this agreement.
Clairborne Fordham
In October 2000, the Company and Prudential Real Estate Investors ("PREI"), an affiliate of Prudential Life Insurance Company, organized Clairborne Fordham which provided an aggregate of $34,000,000 of mezzanine financing for the construction of Fordham Tower, a 50-story, 227 unit, luxury condominium apartment project to be built on Chicago's near northside ("Fordham Tower"). The Company, which has a 10% interest in Clairborne Fordham, fully funded its $3,400,000 share of the loan. The loan, which matured in October 2003, bore interest at a fixed rate of 10.50% per annum with
- 16 -
Segment Information (continued)
provisions for additional interest to PREI and the Company and was secured by a lien on the equity interests of the owner of Fordham Tower. The Company may earn fees from PREI's additional interest based upon certain levels of returns on the project. Such additional interest and fees had not been accrued by the Company or Clairborne Fordham through the maturity of the loan. The Company's investment in the Clairborne Fordham venture is accounted for on the equity method.
The loan was not repaid at maturity and as of October 2003 an amended loan agreement was executed extending the loan to December 31, 2004. The amended terms provided for the placement of a first mortgage lien on the project, no interest to be accrued after September 30, 2003 and for the borrower to add to the existing principal amount the additional interest due Clairborne Fordham at September 30, 2003 of approximately $19,240,000. In lieu of interest after September 30, 2003, Clairborne Fordham will also participate in certain additional cash flows, as defined, if earned from net sales proceeds of the Fordham Tower project.
The agreement provides for all proceeds after project costs to be first applied to payment in full of the loan and the additional interest to Clairborne Fordham before any sharing of project cash flow with the borrower. Principal payments aggregating approximately $1,300,000 and $4,885,000 were made during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, (of which the Company's share was $129,000 and $488,000, respectively) as a result of unit sales and other income generated by the project on the retail space and parking facility.
The Company and Clairborne Fordham have (i) concluded that their respective investment and loan balances are not impaired at June 30, 2004 and (ii) determined to recognize a portion of the additional interest over the expected remaining life of the loan. The Company's share of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was approximately $119,000 and $212,000, respectively. The Company did not recognize any additional interest during the comparable 2003 periods, but earned contractual interest of $90,000 and $179,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, on the then outstanding loan balance. The Company's equity investment in Clairborne Fordham was $2,817,000 and $3,186,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The Company and its partner in Clairborne Fordham are negotiating an agreement with the owners of Fordham Tower to take over ownership of the remaining 19 unsold units, as well as the 188 space parking garage and 12,000 square feet of retail space. It is the intention of Clairborne Fordham to complete the orderly sell-out of these components. Management of the Company believes that this transaction, if it happens, will not result in any loss to Clairborne Fordham or the Company.
421 Chestnut Street Sale and Keewaydin Sale Contingent Proceeds
During April 2004, the Company sold the 421 Chestnut Street property for net proceeds of approximately $2,700,000. This asset was the last remaining asset from the Company's 1998 acquisition of Value Property Trust. The Company reversed approximately $625,000 of previously recorded impairment reserves. At June 30, 2004, the Company recognized approximately $184,000 of the balance of the proceeds which had been placed in escrow from the sale of its Keewaydin property in July 2003, as a result of the expiration of the contingency period. This amount and the reversal of the impairment reserve are reflected in income from discontinued operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
- 17 -
Segment Information (continued)
Property Development and Land Investments - Wellsford Development
Palomino Park
At June 30, 2004, the Company had an 85.85% interest as managing owner in Palomino Park, a five phase, 1,800 unit multifamily residential development in Highlands Ranch, a south suburb of Denver, Colorado. Three phases aggregating 1,184 units are completed and operational as rental property. A 264 unit fourth phase has been converted into condominiums. Sales commenced in February 2001 and through June 30, 2004, the Company has sold 238 units. The Company is actively exploring the development and construction of a 259 unit condominium project on the land for the remaining fifth phase. The Company's equity in Palomino Park is approximately $11,240,000 at June 30, 2004.
The following table provides information regarding sales of Silver Mesa units:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
Project | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
Total | |||||||||||||
Number of units sold | 19 | 11 | 29 | 16 | 238 | ||||||||||||
Gross proceeds | $ | 4,658,000 | $ | 2,461,000 | $ | 6,944,000 | $ | 3,657,000 | $ | 52,046,000 | |||||||
Principal paydown on Silver Mesa | |||||||||||||||||
Conversion Loan (A) | $ | -- | $ | 3,327,000 | $ | -- | $ | 4,318,000 | $ | 32,000,000 |
(A) | The Silver Mesa Conversion Loan was prepaid fully during May 2003. |
East Lyme
During June 2004, the Company purchased a 100 single family home site in East Lyme, Connecticut for approximately $6,200,000. The Company is in the process of finalizing an agreement with a home builder who would construct and sell the homes on the site and who will have a 5% interest in the project and receive other consideration. The Company is in the process of obtaining financing for the project and is expecting to start construction during the fourth quarter of 2004.
4. Shareholders' Equity
The Company did not declare or distribute any dividends during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The following table details the components of comprehensive (loss):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (2,313,570 | ) | $ | (1,032,439 | ) | $ | (9,832,463 | ) | $ | (556,157 | ) | ||
Share of unrealized income on interest rate | ||||||||||||||
protection contract purchased by joint | ||||||||||||||
venture investment, net of income tax expense | 18,904 | 23,458 | 50,429 | 152,611 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) | $ | (2,294,666 | ) | $ | (1,008,981 | ) | $ | (9,782,034 | ) | $ | (403,546 | ) | ||
- 18 -
Shareholders' Equity (continued)
During March 2004, the Company received a modification to the terms of the letter of credit with Commerzbank AG (the credit enhancer on the $12,680,000 of tax-exempt Palomino Park bonds) to reduce the minimum net worth requirement to $120,000,000, which amount includes the $25,000,000 of Convertible Trust Preferred Securities as equity under the terms of the letter of credit agreement. During June 2004, the Company made the determination it would not meet the debt service coverage covenant at June 30, 2004. As a result, the Company notified Commerzbank AG and on July 28, 2004, the Company obtained an amendment to the letter of credit agreement eliminating the debt service coverage covenant effective as of June 30, 2004 and continuing through the May 2005 maturity. The Company was in compliance with the other covenants at June 30, 2004.
5. Share Option Plans
Pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 148, the pro forma net (loss) available to common shareholders as if the fair value approach to accounting for share-based compensation had been applied for grants of options in prior years is as follows:
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) | For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
Net (loss) - as reported | $ | (2,314 | ) | $ | (1,032 | ) | $ | (9,832 | ) | $ | (556 | ) | ||
Add stock option expense included in net (loss) | ||||||||||||||
income as reported, net of tax | 33 | -- | 66 | -- | ||||||||||
Deduct fair value expense for stock options, net of tax | (54 | ) | (41 | ) | (109 | ) | (82 | ) | ||||||
Net (loss) - pro forma | $ | (2,335 | ) | $ | (1,073 | ) | $ | (9,875 | ) | $ | (638 | ) | ||
Net (loss) per common share, basic and diluted: | ||||||||||||||
As reported | $ | (0.36 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Pro forma | $ | (0.36 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (1.53 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||
6. Income Taxes
The income tax expense (benefit) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 results from the state and local taxes based upon income, minimum state and local taxes based upon capital and, in 2003, a provision for Federal income taxes.
The income tax benefit attributable to the Convertible Trust Preferred Securities in 2003 and the tax expense (benefit) of discontinued operations during 2004 and 2003 is based upon the expected Federal and/or state tax rates during such periods.
WCPT was established in 1997 to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") and to own the Company's investment in Wellsford/Whitehall. WCPT has qualified as a REIT through December 31, 2003. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company determined that WCPT may no longer qualify for REIT status as a result of non-qualifying income exceeding the maximum threshold due to sales of assets by Wellsford/Whitehall. As a result, the Company may be subject in the future to certain state taxes related to its interests in the operations of Wellsford/Whitehall. The Company does not believe that there will be a material impact to its operations or cash flows during 2004 as a result of WCPT not qualifying as a REIT.
- 19 -
7. Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including class A-1 common shares. Diluted earnings per common share are based upon the increased number of common shares that would be outstanding assuming the exercise of dilutive common share options and Convertible Trust Preferred Securities, if any.
The following table details the computation of earnings per common share, basic and diluted:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||||||||
Numerator: | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations | $ | (3,103,031 | ) | $ | (1,026,897 | ) | $ | (10,608,777 | ) | $ | (596,089 | ) | ||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net | ||||||||||||||
of income tax expense (benefit) of $17,000, | ||||||||||||||
$(13,000), $17,000 and $10,000, respectively | 789,461 | (5,542 | ) | 776,314 | 39,932 | |||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (2,313,570 | ) | $ | (1,032,439 | ) | $ | (9,832,463 | ) | $ | (556,157 | ) | ||
Denominator: | ||||||||||||||
Denominator for net (loss) per common share, basic | ||||||||||||||
- weighted average common shares | 6,459,738 | 6,453,730 | 6,458,635 | 6,452,916 | ||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | ||||||||||||||
Stock options | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||
Convertible Trust Preferred Securities | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||
Denominator for net (loss) per common share, | ||||||||||||||
diluted -weighted average common shares | 6,459,738 | 6,453,730 | 6,458,635 | 6,452,916 | ||||||||||
Per share amounts, basic and diluted: | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations | $ | (0.48 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (1.64 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||
Income from discontinued operations | 0.12 | -- | 0.12 | 0.01 | ||||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (0.36 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
- 20 -
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
General
Capitalized terms used herein which are not defined elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2004.
Business
The Company is a real estate merchant banking firm headquartered in New York City which acquires, develops, finances and operates real properties and organizes and invests in private and public real estate companies. The Company has established three strategic business units ("SBUs") within which it executes its business plan: (i) Commercial Property Investments which are held in the Company's subsidiary, Wellsford Commercial Properties Trust ("WCPT"), through its ownership interest in Wellsford/Whitehall Group, L.L.C. ("Wellsford/Whitehall"); (ii) Debt and Equity Investments - Wellsford Capital SBU; and (iii) Property Development and Land Investments - Wellsford Development SBU.
During March 2004, the Company's Board of Directors authorized and retained the investment banking firm of Lazard Fréres & Co. LLC to advise the Company on various strategic financial and business alternatives available to it to maximize shareholder value. These may include a recapitalization, acquisitions, dispositions of assets, a liquidation, the sale or merger of the Company and alternatives that would keep the Company independent. There is no assurance as to which, if any, of the aforementioned alternatives may occur.
Commercial Property Investments - Wellsford/Whitehall
The Company's commercial property investments consist solely of its interest in Wellsford/Whitehall, a joint venture by and among the Company, various entities affiliated with the Whitehall Funds ("Whitehall"), private real estate funds sponsored by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. ("Goldman Sachs") and a family based in New England (the Family). The Company had a 32.59% interest in Wellsford/Whitehall as of June 30, 2004. The manager of the joint venture is a Goldman Sachs and Whitehall affiliate.
The Company's investment in Wellsford/Whitehall, which is accounted for on the equity method, was approximately $14,199,000 and $14,616,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
At June 30, 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall owned and operated 24 properties (including 16 office properties, five net-leased retail properties and three land parcels) totaling approximately 2,664,000 square feet of improvements, primarily located in New Jersey and Massachusetts. During July 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall completed a transaction whereby six Massachusetts office properties aggregating 891,000 square feet were transferred to the Family in exchange for its interest in Wellsford/Whitehall and other consideration.
Debt and Equity Investments - Wellsford Capital
The Company, through the Debt and Equity Investments - Wellsford Capital SBU, primarily makes debt investments directly, or through joint ventures, predominantly in real estate related senior, junior or otherwise subordinated debt instruments and also in investment grade rated commercial mortgage backed securities and other asset-backed securities. The debt investments may be unsecured or secured by liens on real estate, liens on equity interests in real estate, pools of mortgage loans, or various other assets including, but not limited to, leases on aircraft, truck or car fleets, leases on equipment, consumer receivables, pools of corporate bonds and loans and sovereign debt, as well as interests in such assets or their economic benefits. Junior and subordinated loans and investments generally have the potential for high yields or returns more characteristic of equity ownership. They may include debt that is acquired at a discount, mezzanine financing, commercial mortgage-backed securities, secured and unsecured lines of credit, distressed loans, tax exempt bonds secured by real estate and loans previously made by foreign and other financial institutions. The Company believes that there are opportunities to acquire real estate debt and other debt, especially in the low or below investment grade
- 21 -
tranches, at significant returns as a result of inefficiencies in pricing in the marketplace, while utilizing the expertise of both the Company and its joint venture partners to analyze the underlying assets and thereby effectively minimizing risk.
At June 30, 2004, the Company had the following investments: (i) a direct debt investment of $2,064,000 which bore interest at 8.25% per annum during 2004 and has a maturity of December 31, 2005; (ii) approximately $25,829,000 of equity investments in companies which were organized to invest in debt instruments, including approximately $23,011,000 in Second Holding Company, LLC ("Second Holding"), a company which was organized to purchase investment and non-investment grade rated real estate debt instruments and investment grade rated other asset-backed securities, and approximately $2,817,000 in Clairborne Fordham Tower, L.L.C. ("Clairborne Fordham"), a company organized to provide $34,000,000 of mezzanine financing for a highrise condominium project in Chicago; (iii) approximately $6,790,000 invested in Reis, a real estate information and database company; and (iv) a $450,000 loan to a venture organized to purchase land parcels for rezoning, subdivision and creation of environmental mitigation credits.
Proeprty Development and Land Investments - Wellsford Development
The Company, through the Property Development and Land Investments - Wellsford Development SBU, engages in selective development activities of single family "for sale" housing and multifamily rental as opportunities arise and when justified by expected returns. The Company believes that by pursuing selective development activities, it can achieve returns which are greater than returns that could be achieved by acquiring stabilized multifamily rental properties. As part of its strategy, the Company may seek to issue tax-exempt bond financing authorized by local governmental authorities which generally bears interest at rates substantially below rates available from conventional financing.
At June 30, 2004, the Company had an 85.85% interest as managing owner in Palomino Park, a five phase, 1,800 unit multifamily residential development in Highlands Ranch, a south suburb of Denver, Colorado. Three phases aggregating 1,184 units are completed and operational as rental property. A 264 unit fourth phase has been converted into condominiums. Sales commenced in February 2001 and through June 30, 2004, the Company has sold 238 units. The Company is actively exploring the development and construction of a 259 unit condominium project on the land for the remaining fifth phase. The Company's equity in Palomino Park is approximately $11,240,000 at June 30, 2004. Additionally, the Company purchased land in East Lyme, Connecticut in June 2004 for approximately $6,200,000 on which it plans to construct and sell 100 single family homes.
Other Segment Information
The following table provides physical occupancy rates and gross leasable square footage/gross rentable units by SBU at each specified date:
Commercial Property Investments (A) |
Property Development and Land Investments (C) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Occupancy % |
Gross Leasable Square Feet |
Physical Occupancy % |
Gross Rentable Units | |||||||||||
June 30, 2004 pro forma (B) | 51 | % | 1,773,000 | 96 | % | 1,184 | ||||||||
June 30, 2004 | 46 | % | 2,664,000 | 96 | % | 1,184 | ||||||||
March 31, 2004 | 52 | % | 2,664,000 | 95 | % | 1,184 | ||||||||
December 31, 2003 | 69 | % | 2,538,000 | 88 | % | 1,184 | ||||||||
September 30, 2003 | 73 | % | 2,206,000 | 91 | % | 1,184 | ||||||||
June 30, 2003 | 73 | % | 2,206,000 | 87 | % | 1,184 | ||||||||
March 31, 2003 | 73 | % | 2,346,000 | 93 | % | 1,184 | ||||||||
December 31, 2002 | 76 | % | 3,328,000 | 95 | % | 1,184 |
(A) | Physical Occupancy % and Gross Leasable Square Feet exclude square feet for properties under renovation of 270,000 square feet at December 31, 2003 and 546,000 square feet at September 30, 2003, June 30, 2003, March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002. No properties were classified as under renovation at June 30, 2004. |
- 22 -
(B) | Reflects Physical Occupancy % and Gross Leasable Square Feet for the Commercial Property Investments considering the effect of the transaction with the family in July 2004. |
(C) | For the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the average concession was approximately three months of rent on a 12-month lease. |
See Note 3 of the Company's unaudited consolidated financial statements for quarterly financial information regarding the Company's industry segments.
Significant Accounting Policies Adopted During the Period
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46 "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" ("FIN 46"). A Variable Interest Entity ("VIE") is created when (i) the equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity from financing its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties or (ii) equity holders either (a) lack direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity, (b) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity or (c) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. If an entity is deemed to be a VIE, pursuant to FIN 46, an enterprise that absorbs a majority of the expected losses or receives a majority of the residual returns of the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. The provisions of FIN 46 are effective immediately for variable interest entities formed or acquired after January 31, 2003 and in the period ending after December 15, 2003 for variable interest entities in which the Company held an interest before February 1, 2003.
The Company has three variable interest entities, one of which is consolidated and two which are not under the provisions of FIN 46. During the first quarter of 2004, based on the provisions of FIN 46, the Company was required to deconsolidate the entity which issued the Convertible Trust Preferred Securities. The provisions of FIN 46 do not allow for a reclassification of prior period presentations to conform with the current period presentation. As a result of deconsolidation, the Company recorded its $775,000 voting equity interest in WRP Convertible Trust I as an investment in joint ventures. WRP Convertible Trust I holds $25,775,000 of 8.25% junior subordinated debentures (the "Debentures") of the Company, which is included in total liabilities at June 30, 2004 on the balance sheet, rather than the $25,000,000 of previously reported Convertible Trust Preferred Securities. The $775,000 voting equity interest had previously been eliminated in consolidation. The expense of $509,000 and $1,050,000 for the Debentures and related cost amortization is included in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. The expense for the comparable prior periods is included in accrued distributions and amortization of costs on Convertible Trust Preferred Securities on the statement of operations and reported net of taxes. There is no impact on the cash flows of the Company upon adoption.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2004 to the three months ended June 30, 2003
The change in net (loss) per share, basic and diluted from a loss in 2003 of $(0.16) per share to a (loss) in 2004 of $(0.36) per share, is attributable to a current period (loss) of $(2,314,000), whereas in the 2003 period, the Company had a (loss) of $(1,032,000).
Rental revenue decreased $175,000. This decrease is due to the impact of rent concessions in excess of the 2003 period at all phases of Palomino Park in the Wellsford Development SBU ($400,000) and reduced rental operations at the Silver Mesa phase resulting from unit sales and all units being classified as sales inventory by December 31, 2003 whereas certain units were still being rented during the 2003 period as compared to the 2004 period ($192,000), offset by increased average physical occupancy at the Blue Ridge, Red Canyon and Green River phases at Palomino Park ($417,000).
Revenues from sales of residential units and the associated cost of sales from such units were $4,658,000 and $3,856,000, respectively, from 19 sales during the three months ended June 30, 2004 and were $2,461,000 and $2,126,000, respectively, from 11 sales during the corresponding 2003 period. The average pre-tax income from 2004 unit sales was approximately $12,000 greater per unit than in the corresponding 2003 period as a
- 23 -
result of a reduced commission rate on the units sold and no interest costs included in cost of sales in 2004 as the outstanding debt balance was repaid in May 2003.
Interest revenue decreased $700,000. This decrease is primarily due to reduced interest of $780,000 on loans from lower average outstanding loan balances in the 2004 period as compared to the 2003 period (including $758,000 related to the loss of revenue during the second quarter of 2004 from the 277 Park Loan prepayment in September 2003), offset by increased interest earned on cash and securities of $96,000 from a higher average outstanding investable cash and U.S. Government securities balance during the current period versus the comparable 2003 period.
Fee revenue decreased $89,000. Asset disposition fees payable by Whitehall derived from Wellsford/Whitehall sales amounted to $84,000 during 2003, with no fees earned in the 2004 period. The Company's management fees for its role in the Second Holding investment increased by $5,000. Fee revenue will be impacted in the future by changes in the amount of assets under management by Second Holding as a result of the decision not to purchase any new assets and allow the run-off of existing investments.
Property operating and maintenance expense decreased $108,000. This decrease is primarily the result of a decline in operating expenses for the Silver Mesa phase from continuing unit sales during 2003 and 2004 (see sales discussion above) ($90,000).
The decrease in real estate taxes of $3,000 is attributable to reduced taxes from fewer Silver Mesa units from continuing sales ($43,000) and reduced taxes on the Gold Peak land from a lower assessment ($14,000), almost entirely offset by higher estimates for assessments and rates in the 2004 period as compared to the 2003 period for the Blue Ridge, Red Canyon and Green River phases at Palomino Park ($54,000).
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $71,000. This decrease is primarily attributable to the Company expensing $76,000 of unamortized warrant costs in 2003 with no such expense in the 2004 period as the entire unamortized balance was written-off at December 31, 2003 in connection with the impairment charge recorded by Wellsford/Whitehall. The decrease is additionally impacted by no depreciation expense recorded on the Silver Mesa units as all of the units were transferred from operations to residential units available for sale during 2003 ($34,000), offset by additional amortization related to the Clairborne Fordham venture recorded in the second quarter of 2004 ($40,000).
Aggregate interest expense increased $467,000. This increase is attributable to interest expense on $25,775,000 of Debentures during the period of $509,000 as a result of the adoption of FIN 46 and the deconsolidation of the Convertible Trust Preferred Securities, as previously described, whereas such expense was treated as a distribution in the 2003 period. In addition, the 2004 period had a higher average base interest rate on the Palomino Park Bonds as compared to the 2003 period ($2,000). These increases where offset by lower average outstanding principal balances with respect to the other Palomino Park phases' loans ($22,000) and capitalized interest of $22,000 in 2004 with no amounts capitalized in the 2003 period.
General and administrative expenses increased $371,000 as described below:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
(Decrease) Increase | |||||||||
General and administrative expense per Statements of Operations | $ | 1,786,000 | $ | 1,415,000 | $ | 371,000 | |||||
Less non-cash component of general and administrative expenses | |||||||||||
for: | |||||||||||
Amortization of stock generally issued into deferred | |||||||||||
compensation plan | -- | 63,000 | (63,000 | ) | |||||||
Expensing of stock options | 33,000 | -- | 33,000 | ||||||||
Total non-cash component of general and administrative expenses | 33,000 | 63,000 | (30,000 | ) | |||||||
Cash component of general and administrative expenses (A) | $ | 1,753,000 | $ | 1,352,000 | $ | 401,000 | |||||
- 24 -
(A) | The principal reason for the increase in the cash component of general and administrative expenses is primarily the costs to retain an investment banker and expected additional costs for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
The Company recognized a (loss) of $(1,014,000) in the three months ended June 30, 2004 from its joint venture investments as compared to a (loss) of $(175,000) in 2003. An analysis of the change follows:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||
Wellsford/Whitehall: | |||||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations (A) | $ | (1,594,000 | ) | $ | (337,000 | ) | $ | (1,257,000 | ) | ||
Net gain from assets sold (B) | -- | 280,000 | (280,000 | ) | |||||||
Write-off of deferred debt costs and prepayment penalties | |||||||||||
from debt pay-offs and interest expense on assets sold (B) | -- | (540,000 | ) | 540,000 | |||||||
(Loss) from discontinued operations (A) (B) | (9,000 | ) | (35,000 | ) | 26,000 | ||||||
(Loss) from Wellsford/Whitehall | (1,603,000 | ) | (632,000 | ) | (971,000 | ) | |||||
Second Holding | 470,000 | 368,000 | 102,000 | ||||||||
Clairborne Fordham | 119,000 | 90,000 | 29,000 | ||||||||
Other | -- | (1,000 | ) | 1,000 | |||||||
(Loss) from joint ventures | $ | (1,014,000 | ) | $ | (175,000 | ) | $ | (839,000 | ) | ||
(A) | Both periods were impacted by the sale of properties during 2003, lower occupancy and continuing declines in rental rates. |
(B) | One property was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2003. Two properties and one land parcel were sold during the 2003 period with no sales in the corresponding 2004 period. The write-off of deferred debt costs relates to the properties held for sale or sold which were encumbered. |
Minority interest changed $43,000 to a benefit of $4,000 in the 2004 period from a benefit of $47,000 in the 2003 period, primarily attributable to minority interest benefit related to the consolidation of an entity in accordance with the provisions of FIN 46 ($15,000), offset by a change in minority interest for the Wellsford Development SBU to an expense of $11,000 in the 2004 period as compared to a benefit of $47,000 in the 2003 period due to income during the quarter in 2004 from that SBU whereas the comparable 2003 period reported a loss.
The change in income tax expense to $59,000 in 2004 compared to a benefit of $467,000 in 2003 results primarily from a reversal of the first quarter tax provision during 2003 with no such benefit available in 2004.
The change in after tax cost of the Convertible Trust Preferred Securities results from reclassifying this expense for the 2004 period into interest expense as a result of the adoption of FIN 46 (see interest expense discussion).
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, after taxes, reflects the reclassification of the revenue and expenses from the two VLP properties in the Wellsford Capital SBU as a result of the change in classification to held for sale at June 30, 2003. The income (loss) from discontinued operations was $789,000 and $(6,000) for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The change between the two periods is primarily attributable to the sale of the remaining property during April 2004, at which time, the Company recognized a reversal of an impairment reserve upon the completion of that sale and recognized contingent proceeds from a 2003 property sale during the three months ended June 30, 2004, the sum of which aggregated $809,000. This amount was partially offset by the loss of operating income between the periods and the effect of state income taxes.
Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2004 to the six months ended June 30, 2003
The change in net (loss) per share, basic and diluted from a (loss) in 2003 of $(0.09) per share to a loss in 2004 of $(1.52) per share, is attributable to a current period (loss) of $(9,832,000), whereas in the 2003 period, the Company had a (loss) of $(556,000). The results for the six months ended June 30, 2004 were impacted by the Company's share of an impairment charge recorded by its Second Holding joint venture. The charge at the
- 25 -
Second Holding level of $13,230,000 (of which the Company's 51% allocation was $6,759,000), related to the write-down of one of its investments to its deemed fair value as a result of an other than temporary decline in the market value of the bonds and underlying aircraft collateral.
Rental revenue decreased $729,000. This decrease is due to the impact of rent concessions in excess of the 2003 period at all phases of Palomino Park in the Wellsford Development SBU ($755,000) and reduced rental operations at the Silver Mesa phase resulting from unit sales and all units being classified as sales inventory by December 31, 2003, whereas certain units were still being rented during the 2003 period as compared to the 2004 period ($434,000), offset by increased average physical occupancy at the Blue Ridge, Red Canyon and Green River phases at Palomino Park ($460,000).
Revenues from sales of residential units and the associated cost of sales from such units were $6,944,000 and $5,770,000, respectively, from 29 sales during 2004 and were $3,657,000 and $3,181,000, respectively, from 16 sales during the corresponding 2003 period. The average pre-tax income from 2004 unit sales was approximately $11,000 greater per unit than in the corresponding 2003 period as a result of a reduced commission rate on the units sold and no interest costs included in cost of sales in 2004 as the outstanding debt balance was repaid in May 2003.
Interest revenue decreased $1,408,000. This decrease is due to reduced interest of $1,550,000 on loans from lower average outstanding loan balances in the 2004 period as compared to the 2003 period (including $1,508,000 related to the loss of revenue during the 2004 period from the 277 Park Loan prepayment in September 2003) and $31,000 of non-recurring income earned in 2003 with no 2004 equivalent, offset by increased interest earned on cash and U.S. Government securities of $173,000 from a higher average outstanding investable cash and securities balance during the current period versus the comparable 2003 period.
Fee revenue decreased $384,000. Asset disposition fees payable by Whitehall derived from Wellsford/Whitehall sales amounted to $46,000 during 2004, as compared to fees of $430,000 earned in the 2003 period. The Company's management fees for its role in the Second Holding investment were unchanged. Fee revenue will be impacted in the future by changes in the amount of assets under management by Second Holding as a result of the decision not to purchase any new assets and allow the run-off of existing investments.
Property operating and maintenance expense decreased $5,000. This decrease is primarily the result of a decline in operating expenses for the Silver Mesa phase from continuing unit sales during 2003 and 2004 (see sales discussion above) ($163,000), almost entirely offset by increases in utilities, advertising, payroll and replacements at the other phases of Palomino Park ($158,000).
The increase in real estate taxes of $22,000 is attributable to higher estimates for assessments and rates in the 2004 period as compared to the 2003 period for the Blue Ridge, Red Canyon and Green River phases at Palomino Park ($92,000), offset by reduced taxes from fewer Silver Mesa units from continuing sales ($42,000) and reduced taxes on the Gold Peak land from a lower assessment ($28,000).
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $1,159,000. This decrease is primarily attributable to the Company expensing $1,171,000 of unamortized warrant costs in 2003, including $1,001,000 attributable to asset sales in that period, with no such expense in the 2004 period as the entire unamortized balance was written-off at December 31, 2003 in connection with the impairment charge recorded by Wellsford/Whitehall. The decrease is additionally impacted by no depreciation expense recorded on the Silver Mesa units as all of the units were transferred from operations to residential units available for sale during 2003 ($69,000), offset by additional amortization related to the Clairborne Fordham venture recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2004 ($80,000).
Aggregate interest expense increased $1,084,000. This increase is attributable to interest expense on $25,775,000 of Debentures during the period of $1,050,000 as a result of the adoption of FIN 46 and the deconsolidation of the Convertible Trust Preferred Securities, as previously described, whereas such expense was treated as a distribution in the 2003 period. The increase is also attributable to the Green River phase as the 2004 period includes interest for the entire quarter at a higher fixed rate on a larger average outstanding balance
- 26 -
on the permanent financing, whereas during the 2003 period, there was a lower variable interest rate on a lower amount of construction financing until the permanent financing was in place in February 2003 ($76,000). In addition, the 2004 period had a higher average base interest rate on the Palomino Park Bonds as compared to the 2003 period ($16,000). These increases where offset by lower average outstanding principal balances with respect to the other Palomino Park phases' loans ($30,000) and capitalized interest of $28,000 in 2004 with no amounts capitalized in the 2003 period.
General and administrative expenses increased $674,000 as described below:
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
(Decrease) Increase | |||||||||
General and administrative expense per Statement of Operations | $ | 3,599,000 | $ | 2,925,000 | $ | 674,000 | |||||
Less non-cash component of general and administrative expenses | |||||||||||
for: | |||||||||||
Amortization of stock generally issued into deferred | |||||||||||
compensation plan | -- | 151,000 | (151,000 | ) | |||||||
Expensing of stock options | 66,000 | -- | 66,000 | ||||||||
Total non-cash component of general and administrative expenses | 66,000 | 151,000 | (85,000 | ) | |||||||
Cash component of general and administrative expenses (A) | $ | 3,533,000 | $ | 2,774,000 | $ | 759,000 | |||||
(A) | The principal reason for the increase in the cash component of general and administrative expenses is primarily the costs to retain an investment banker and expected additional costs for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. |
The Company recognized a (loss) of $(6,106,000) in the six months ended June 30, 2004 from its joint venture investments as compared to income of $2,410,000 in 2003. An analysis of the change follows:
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||
Wellsford/Whitehall: | |||||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations (A) | $ | (2,239,000 | ) | $ | (391,000 | ) | $ | (1,848,000 | ) | ||
Net gain from assets sold (B) | 1,672,000 | 2,837,000 | (1,165,000 | ) | |||||||
Write-off of deferred debt costs and prepayment penalties | |||||||||||
from debt pay-offs and interest expense on assets sold (B) | (22,000 | ) | (1,466,000 | ) | 1,444,000 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations (A) (B) | 122,000 | 533,000 | (411,000 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) income from Wellsford/Whitehall | (467,000 | ) | 1,513,000 | (1,980,000 | ) | ||||||
Second Holding (C) | (5,851,000 | ) | 719,000 | (6,570,000 | ) | ||||||
Clairborne Fordham | 212,000 | 179,000 | 33,000 | ||||||||
Other | -- | (1,000 | ) | 1,000 | |||||||
(Loss) income from joint ventures | $ | (6,106,000 | ) | $ | 2,410,000 | $ | (8,516,000 | ) | |||
(A) | Both periods were impacted by the sale of properties during 2003, lower occupancy and continuing declines in rental rates. |
(B) | One property was classified as held for sale at December 31, 2003. Ten properties and one land parcel were sold during the 2003 period with one sale in the corresponding 2004 period. The write-off of deferred debt costs relates to the properties held for sale or sold which were encumbered. |
(C) | The decrease in earnings is a result of a $13,230,000 impairment charge taken by Second Holding during the first quarter 2004, as previously described, of which the Company's share was $6,759,000. |
Minority interest changed $3,000 to a benefit of $44,000 in the 2004 period from a benefit of $41,000 in the 2003 period, primarily attributable to a minority interest benefit related to the consolidation of an entity in accordance with the provisions of FIN 46 ($30,000), offset by a reduction in the minority interest benefit from a smaller loss in the Wellsford Development SBU in 2004 as compared to the 2003 period ($27,000).
- 27 -
The change in income tax expense to $99,000 in 2004 compared to an expense of $214,000 in 2003 results primarily from larger losses in 2004 than 2003.
The change in after tax cost of the Convertible Trust Preferred Securities results from reclassifying this expense for the 2004 period into interest expense as a result of the adoption of FIN 46 (see interest expense discussion).
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, after taxes, reflects the reclassification of the revenue and expenses from the two VLP properties in the Wellsford Capital SBU as a result of the change in classification to held for sale at June 30, 2003. The income (loss) from discontinued operations was $776,000 and $40,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The change between the two periods is primarily attributable to the sale of the remaining property during April 2004, at which time, the Company recognized a reversal of an impairment reserve upon the completion of that sale and recognized contingent proceeds from a 2003 property sale during the three months ended June 30, 2004, the sum of which aggregated $809,000. That amount was partially offset by the loss of operating income between the periods and the effect of state income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Consolidated for the Company
The Company expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements, such as operating expenses, debt service on mortgage notes payable and debentures and the share of any financing requirements of its Wellsford/Whitehall venture, generally through its available cash, sales of residential units in the Wellsford Development SBU, distributions from investments in joint ventures and cash provided by rental and interest revenues.
The Company expects to meet its long-term liquidity requirements such as maturing mortgages, credit enhancement expirations, financing acquisitions, new investments and development, financing capital improvements, minority interest distributions, joint venture financing requirements (including the Company's share of any financing requirements for Wellsford/Whitehall) and Debenture distributions through the use of available cash, maturing investments in U.S. Government securities, receipt of payments related to notes receivable, distributions from investments in joint ventures, refinancings and the issuance of debt and the offering of additional debt and equity securities. The Company considers its cash to be adequate and expects it to continue to be adequate to meet operating requirements both in the short and long-terms.
Wellsford/Whitehall
Wellsford/Whitehall expects to meet its short and long-term liquidity requirements, such as financing additional renovations, tenant improvements and leasing costs of its properties, repayments of debt maturities and operating expenses with available cash, operating cash flow from its properties, refinancing and/or restructuring of existing loans, sales of properties and additional financing or preferred equity, as described below, from the principal owners of Wellsford/Whitehall, if required. Wellsford/Whitehall sold one property during the six months ended June 30, 2004 and realized approximately $10,500,000 of net proceeds which were used for working capital purposes by the venture.
Wellsford/Whitehall executed an amended agreement with General Electric Capital Corporation ("GECC") effective April 1, 2004, relating to the modification of the $106,000,000 loan (the "GECC Facility"). The amended agreement provides for an extension of the loan maturity to December 31, 2006, interest at LIBOR plus 3.25% per annum and a $16,000,000 line of credit to fund certain capital improvements, subject to certain conditions, through December 31, 2005. Excess cash flow, as defined, from the properties collateralizing the GECC Facility can only be used for capital expenditures for such properties. Wellsford/Whitehall was required to establish lock box arrangements for the deposit of all rent receipts relating to each of the properties collateralizing the GECC Facility. The loan is collateralized by eight office properties in New Jersey and one in Massachusetts.
- 28 -
In July 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall completed a transaction whereby it transferred six of its Massachusetts properties (aggregating 891,000 square feet), which were subject to mortgage debt of $64,252,000 ("Nomura Loan") at June 30, 2004, along with related restricted cash balances aggregating $6,428,000, cash and certain other consideration to a newly formed partnership which includes the Family that owned an aggregate 7.45% equity interest in Wellsford/Whitehall (the "Family Partnership"), in exchange for the Family's equity interests in Wellsford/Whitehall. The Family also agreed to eliminate an existing tax indemnity which Wellsford/Whitehall had to the Family's members. As a result of this transaction, Wellsford/Whitehall expects to record a loss of approximately $5,000,000 during the three months ending September 30, 2004, of which the Company's share is approximately $1,600,000. As a result of the redemption, the Company's interest in Wellsford/Whitehall will increase to 35.21%.
Since March 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall had not made a portion of its scheduled monthly debt service payments on the Nomura Loan. The manager of Wellsford/Whitehall withheld these debt service payments and met with the special servicer to present and discuss various potential debt term alternatives. The portion of the scheduled payments not being made related to the amount by which the debt service due each month exceeded the aggregate rent receipts of the above mentioned six properties, which were payable directly into a lockbox with the lender and were insufficient as a result of low occupancy at these properties. The special servicer has agreed to waive default interest in connection with the nonpayment and restructured the Nomura Loan with the Family Partnership which acquired the six properties as described above.
During March 2004, the Company and Whitehall agreed to provide up to $8,000,000 to Wellsford/Whitehall through March 31, 2005 (of which the Company's share is 35%, or $2,800,000), however, there can be no assurance that this amount will be sufficient. At June 30, 2004, no amounts were advanced by either partner under this agreement. At June 30, 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall's cash and cash equivalents balance was approximately $9,075,000 and restricted cash available for certain capital improvements was approximately $7,755,000.
Second Holding
Second Holding's liquidity requirements for the repayments of bonds, medium-term notes and commercial paper is expected to be provided from principal repayments from amortization of investments and upon repayment of investments at maturity. Second Holding also has $375,000,000 available on its line of credit at June 30, 2004; there were no borrowings on this line of credit at June 30, 2004. The nature of Second Holding's business results in the entity being highly leveraged.
During the second quarter of 2004, the partner owning the 35% income interest informed management of Second Holding that it would not approve the purchase of any further investments, thereby under the terms of the partnership agreement, preventing any future acquisitions of investments. The partners are evaluating alternatives available to Second Holding in addition to holding existing assets through respective maturities and then paying down related debt. As a consequence, operating income, fees to be earned and cash flows to be received by the Company from Second Holding will be reduced in the future.
Other Items Impacting the Company's Liquidity and Resources
REIT Qualification of WCPT
WCPT was established in 1997 to qualify as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") and to own the Company's investment in Wellsford/Whitehall. WCPT has qualified as a REIT through December 31, 2003. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company determined that WCPT may no longer qualify for REIT status as a result of non-qualifying income exceeding the maximum threshold due to sales of assets by Wellsford/Whitehall. As a result, the Company may be subject in the future to certain state taxes related to its interests in the operations of Wellsford/Whitehall. The Company does not believe that there will be a material impact to its operations or cash flows during 2004 as a result of WCPT not qualifying as a REIT.
- 29 -
Wellsford/Whitehall
A buy/sell agreement of equity interests between the Company and Whitehall can be exercised by either partner after December 31, 2003 with respect to the Wellsford/Whitehall venture (the "Buy/Sell Agreement"). The nature of the Buy/Sell Agreement allows for either the Whitehall funds, as a group, or the Company to provide notice that it intends to purchase the non-initiating partner's interest at a specific price per unit. The non-initiating partner may either accept that offer or instead may reject that offer and become the purchaser at the initially offered price. The terms of the Wellsford/Whitehall GECC Facility allow for the continuance of such debt as long as the Company or Whitehall has ultimate decision-making authority over the management and operations of Wellsford/Whitehall. As of the date of this report, neither partner has exercised its buy/sell right under the Buy/Sell Agreement.
Second Holding
Second Holding recorded an impairment charge of $13,230,000 (of which the Company's share was $6,759,000) related to the write-down of one of its investments during the first quarter of 2004, to its deemed fair value as a result of an other than temporary decline in the market value of the bonds and underlying aircraft collateral. The rating for this investment was downgraded to BBB+ from A- by Standard & Poor's during the first quarter of 2004. This investment was sold by Second Holding during May 2004 and Second Holding recorded a recovery of the impairment charge of $300,000 during the second quarter of 2004 (of which the Company's share was $153,000).
During the three months ended June 30, 2004, the partners of Second Holding agreed to cease making any distributions to its partners (including the partner who has a 35% income interest) until the impairment charge is recovered through future earnings.
The following table details the allocation of investments for Second Holding:
(amounts in thousands, except percentages) | June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Security for Investments (A) |
Amount |
Percent |
Amount |
Percent | ||||||||||
Real estate | $ | 509,114 | 35 | % | $ | 562,196 | 32 | % | ||||||
Corporate debt | 418,351 | 29 | % | 446,210 | 26 | % | ||||||||
Consumer/trade receivables | 100,000 | 7 | % | 125,000 | 7 | % | ||||||||
Other asset-backed securities | 438,331 | 29 | % | 610,876 | 35 | % | ||||||||
Total investments (B) | $ | 1,465,796 | 100 | % | $ | 1,744,282 | 100 | % | ||||||
Total assets (C) | $ | 1,809,401 | $ | 1,903,919 | ||||||||||
Standard & Poor's Ratings of Investments | ||||||||||||||
AAA | $ | 1,050,340 | 72 | % | $ | 1,239,233 | 71 | % | ||||||
AA+ | 79,519 | 5 | % | 65,176 | 4 | % | ||||||||
AA | 178,854 | 12 | % | 202,780 | 12 | % | ||||||||
AA- | 78,701 | 5 | % | 116,002 | 7 | % | ||||||||
A+ | 17,922 | 1 | % | 24,922 | 1 | % | ||||||||
A | 53,460 | 4 | % | 59,169 | 3 | % | ||||||||
A- | 7,000 | 1 | % | 37,000 | 2 | % | ||||||||
Total investments (B) | $ | 1,465,796 | 100 | % | $ | 1,744,282 | 100 | % | ||||||
(A) | Investments may be secured by the assets or interests in such assets or their respective economic benefit. |
(B) | Investments are variable rate based at a weighted average annual interest rate of 1.86% and 1.78% at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. |
(C) | Includes $323,170 of cash and cash equivalents and $20,435 of other assets at June 30, 2004. The December 31, 2003 amount includes $133,389 of cash and cash equivalents and $26,248 of other assets. |
- 30 -
Second Holding utilizes funds from the issuance of bonds, medium term notes and commercial paper to make investments. Second Holding had total debt of approximately $1,758,736,000 and $1,837,701,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, including junior subordinated bonds due in April 2010 of $100,000,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. Second Holding debt had a weighted average annual interest rate of 1.28% and 1.22% at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, after the effect of swaps on fixed rate debt to a floating rate.
Clairborne Fordham
In October 2000, the Company and Prudential Real Estate Investors ("PREI"), an affiliate of Prudential Life Insurance Company, organized Clairborne Fordham which provided an aggregate of $34,000,000 of mezzanine financing for the construction of Fordham Tower, a 50-story, 227 unit, luxury condominium apartment project to be built on Chicago's near northside ("Fordham Tower"). The Company, which has a 10% interest in Clairborne Fordham, fully funded its $3,400,000 share of the loan. The loan, which matured in October 2003, bore interest at a fixed rate of 10.50% per annum with provisions for additional interest to PREI and the Company and was secured by a lien on the equity interests of the owner of Fordham Tower. The Company may earn fees from PREI's additional interest based upon certain levels of returns on the project. Such additional interest and fees had not been accrued by the Company or Clairborne Fordham through the maturity of the loan. The Company's investment in the Clairborne Fordham venture is accounted for on the equity method.
The loan was not repaid at maturity and as of October 2003 an amended loan agreement was executed extending the loan to December 31, 2004. The amended terms provided for the placement of a first mortgage lien on the project, no interest to be accrued after September 30, 2003 and for the borrower to add to the existing principal amount the additional interest due Clairborne Fordham at September 30, 2003 of approximately $19,240,000. In lieu of interest after September 30, 2003, Clairborne Fordham will also participate in certain additional cash flows, as defined, if earned from net sales proceeds of the Fordham Tower project.
The agreement provides for all proceeds after project costs to be first applied to payment in full of the loan and the additional interest to Clairborne Fordham before any sharing of project cash flow with the borrower. Principal payments aggregating approximately $1,300,000 and $4,885,000 were made during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, (of which the Company's share was $129,000 and $488,000, respectively) as a result of unit sales and other income generated by the project on the retail space and parking facility.
The Company and Clairborne Fordham have (i) concluded that their respective investment and loan balances are not impaired at June 30, 2004 and (ii) determined to recognize a portion of the additional interest over the expected remaining life of the loan. The Company's share of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was approximately $119,000 and $212,000, respectively. The Company did not recognize any additional interest during the comparable 2003 periods, but earned contractual interest of $90,000 and $179,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, on the then outstanding loan balance. The Company's equity investment in Clairborne Fordham was $2,817,000 and $3,186,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
The Company and its partner in Clairborne Fordham are negotiating an agreement with the owners of Fordham Tower to take over ownership of the remaining 19 unsold units, as well as the 188 space parking garage and 12,000 square feet of retail space. It is the intention of Clairborne Fordham to complete the orderly sell-out of these components. Management of the Company believes that this transaction, if it happens, will not result in any loss to Clairborne Fordham or the Company.
421 Chestnut Street Sale and Keewaydin Sale Contingent Proceeds
During April 2004, the Company sold the 421 Chestnut Street property for net proceeds of approximately $2,700,000. This asset was the last remaining asset from the Company's 1998 acquisition of Value Property Trust. The Company reversed approximately $625,000 of previously recorded impairment reserves. At June 30, 2004, the Company recognized approximately $184,000 of the balance of the proceeds which had been
- 31 -
placed in escrow from the sale of its Keewaydin property in July 2003, as a result of the expiration of the contingency period. This amount and the reversal of the impairment reserve are reflected in income from discontinued operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Silver Mesa Condominium Sales
Sales of condominium units at the Silver Mesa phase of Palomino Park commenced in February 2001 and 238 units have been sold through June 30, 2004. The following table provides information regarding sales of Silver Mesa units:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
Project | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
Total | |||||||||||||
Number of units sold | 19 | 11 | 29 | 16 | 238 | ||||||||||||
Gross proceeds | $ | 4,658,000 | $ | 2,461,000 | $ | 6,944,000 | $ | 3,657,000 | $ | 52,046,000 | |||||||
Principal paydown on Silver Mesa | |||||||||||||||||
Conversion Loan (A) | $ | -- | $ | 3,327,000 | $ | -- | $ | 4,318,000 | $ | 32,000,000 |
(A) | The Silver Mesa Conversion Loan was prepaid fully during May 2003. |
The Company's sales of residential units at Silver Mesa have a seasonal trend where sales are generally higher in the summer and fall months than during the winter and early spring. Sales may be additionally impacted by actual and/or expected changes to interest rates. Therefore, current and past quarterly results may not be indicative of the sales pace in future quarters.
Palomino Park Bonds
During March 2004, the Company received a modification to the terms of the letter of credit with Commerzbank AG (the credit enhancer on the $12,680,000 of tax-exempt Palomino Park bonds) to reduce the minimum net worth requirement to $120,000,000, which amount includes the $25,000,000 of Convertible Trust Preferred Securities as equity under the terms of the letter of credit agreement. During June 2004, the Company made the determination that it would not meet the debt service coverage covenant at June 30, 2004. As a result, the Company notified Commerzbank AG and on July 28, 2004, the Company obtained an amendment to the letter of credit agreement eliminating the debt service coverage covenant effective as of June 30, 2004 and continuing through the May 2005 maturity. The Company was in compliance with the other covenants at June 30, 2004.
East LymeDuring June 2004, the Company purchased a 100 single family home site in East Lyme, Connecticut for approximately $6,200,000. The Company is in the process of finalizing an agreement with a home builder who would construct and sell the homes on the site and who will have a 5% interest in the project and receive other consideration. The Company is in the process of obtaining financing for the project and is expecting to start construction during the fourth quarter of 2004.
Cash Flows
For the six months ended June 30, 2004
Cash flow provided by operating activities of $2,702,000 consists of the following items: (i) the Company's share of an impairment charge from investments in joint ventures of $6,606,000, (ii) a decrease in residential units held for sale of $5,064,000, (iii) depreciation and amortization of $2,294,000, (iv) a decrease in assets held for sale of $449,000, (v) a decrease in prepaid and other assets of $341,000, (vi) the value of option grants for director compensation of $66,000, (vii) shares issued for director compensation of $32,000 and (viii) the net amortization of premiums/discounts on U.S. Government securities of $11,000, offset by (ix) the period's net (loss) of $(9,832,000), (x) gain on sale of assets and release of contingent liability of $809,000, (xi) a decrease in
- 32 -
accrued expenses and other liabilities of $528,000, (xii) an increase in restricted cash and investments of $443,000, (xiii) a decrease in liabilities attributable to assets held for sale of $317,000, (xiv) distributions less than joint venture income of $188,000 and (xv) undistributed minority interest benefit of $44,000.
Cash flow used in investing activities of $5,287,000 is primarily the effect of additions for land held for development of $6,941,000, purchases of U.S. Government securities during the period of $2,558,000 and investments in real estate assets of $2,000, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of real estate assets of $2,694,000, the repayments of notes receivable of $1,032,000 and capital distributions from the Clairborne Fordham joint venture of $488,000.
Cash flow used in financing activities of $697,000 is primarily the payment of principal amortization for mortgage notes payable of $733,000, partially offset by the effect of option exercises during the period of $36,000.
For the six months ended June 30, 2003
Cash flow provided by operating activities of $4,069,000 consists of the following adjustments to the period's net (loss) of $(556,000): (i) depreciation and amortization of $3,453,000, (ii) a decrease in the balance of residential units available for sale of $2,732,000, (iii) a decrease in the balance of prepaid and other assets of $922,000, (iv) amortization of deferred compensation of $151,000, (v) a decrease in the balance of restricted cash and investments of $131,000 and (vi) shares issued for director compensation of $48,000, partially offset by (vii) a decrease in the balance of accrued expenses and other liabilities of $1,374,000, (viii) undistributed joint venture income of $1,322,000, (ix) a decrease in liabilities attributable to assets held for sale of $53,000, (x) undistributed minority interest benefit of $41,000 and (xi) a decrease in assets held for sale of $22,000.
Cash flow provided by investing activities of $507,000 consists of repayments of notes receivable of $516,000, offset by additional investments in real estate assets of $9,000.
Cash flow used in financing activities of $2,357,000 consists of principal payments of mortgage notes payable of $42,030,000 (including $37,111,000 for a maturing construction loan on the Green River property and $4,318,000 for the Silver Mesa Conversion Loan) and deferred financing costs of $327,000 on the new Green River loan, offset by borrowings under such loan of $40,000,000.
Risks Associated with Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the Company, contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company or industry results to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following, which are discussed in greater detail in the "Risk Factors" section of the Company's registration statement on Form S-3 (file No. 333-73874) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on December 14, 2001, as may be amended, which is incorporated herein by reference: general and local economic and business conditions, which will, among other things, affect demand by tenants for commercial and residential properties, availability and credit worthiness of prospective tenants, lease rents and the availability and cost of financing; ability to find suitable investments; future impairment charges as a result of possible continuing declines in the expected values and cash flows of owned properties and investments; competition; risks of real estate acquisition, development, construction and renovation including construction delays and cost overruns; inability to comply with zoning and other laws; vacancies at commercial and multifamily properties; dependence on rental income from real property; the risk of inflation in operating expenses, including, but not limited to, energy, water and insurance; the availability of insurance coverages; the inability to obtain construction financing for its development projects; adverse consequences of debt financing including, without limitation, the necessity of future financings to repay maturing debt obligations; inability to meet financial and valuation covenants contained in loan agreements; inability to repay
- 33 -
financings; risk of foreclosure on collateral; risks of investments in debt instruments, including possible payment defaults and reductions in the value of collateral; uncertainties pertaining to debt investments, including scheduled interest payments, the ultimate repayment of principal, adequate insurance coverages, the ability of insurers to pay claims and effects of changes in ratings from rating agencies; risks associated with the ability to renew or obtain necessary credit enhancements from third parties; risks of subordinate loans; risks of leverage; risks associated with equity investments in and with third parties; risks associated with our reliance on joint venture partners including, but not limited to, the inability to obtain consent from partners for certain business decisions, reliance on partners who are solely responsible for the books, records and financial statements of such ventures, the potential risk that our partners may become bankrupt, have economic or other business interests and objectives which may be inconsistent with those of the Company and our partners being in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests; inability and/or unwillingness of partners to provide their share of any future capital requirements; availability and cost of financing; interest rate risks; demand by prospective buyers of condominium, residential and commercial properties; the uncertainties regarding the Buy/Sell Agreement between the Company and Whitehall with respect to the Wellsford/Whitehall venture including, but not limited to, whether either partner will exercise their rights there under, the timing of such exercise, and the inability by the ultimate purchaser to meet the financial terms of such transaction; future impairment charges as a result of the completion of analyses by the manager of Wellsford/Whitehall upon the recording of the transfer of the Nomura Loan collateral and redemption of the Family's equity interests in the third quarter of 2004; inability to realize gains from the real estate assets held for sale; lower than anticipated sales prices; inability to close on sales of properties; illiquidity of real estate investments; the risks of seasonality and increasing interest rates on the Company's ability to sell condominium units and single family "for sale" housing; environmental risks; uncertainities as to what decisions and transactions may result from the Company's current assessment of its strategic business alternatives, which may include, but not be limited to, a recapitalization, acquisitions, dispositions of assets, a liquidation, the sale or merger of the Company and alternatives that would keep the Company independent; and other risks listed from time to time in the Company's reports filed with the SEC. Therefore, actual results could differ materially from those projected in such statements.
- 34 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
One of the Company's primary market risk exposures is to changes in interest rates. The Company and its joint venture investments each generally manage this risk by offsetting its investments and financing exposures to the extent possible as well as by strategically timing and structuring its transactions. The investments described below are generally made for long-term investing and not for trading purposes. The following table presents the effect of a 1.00% increase in the base rates on all variable rate notes receivable, investments in securities and debt and its impact on annual net income:
(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at June 30, 2004 |
Effect of 1% Increase in Base Rate on Income (Expense) | |||||||
Consolidated assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Note receivable: | ||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | 2,064 | $ | -- | ||||
Investment in U.S. Government securities: | ||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | 30,063 | -- | |||||
Mortgage notes payable: | ||||||||
Variable rate | $ | 12,680 | (127 | ) | ||||
Fixed rate | 96,091 | -- | ||||||
$ | 108,771 | (127 | ) | |||||
Debentures: | ||||||||
Fixed rate | $ | 25,775 | -- | |||||
Proportionate share of assets and liabilities from investments | ||||||||
in joint ventures: | ||||||||
Second Holding: | ||||||||
Investments and commercial paper: | ||||||||
Variable rate | $ | 912,405 | 9,124 | |||||
Debt: | ||||||||
Variable rate | $ | 894,091 | (8,941 | ) | ||||
Net effect from Second Holding | 183 | |||||||
Wellsford/Whitehall: | ||||||||
Debt: | ||||||||
Variable rate, with LIBOR cap (A) | $ | 37,148 | (371 | ) | ||||
Fixed rate | 26,142 | -- | ||||||
$ | 63,290 | |||||||
Effect from Wellsford/Whitehall | (371 | ) | ||||||
Clairborne Fordham: | ||||||||
Fixed rate (B) | $ | 2,402 | -- | |||||
Net decrease in annual income, before minority interest | ||||||||
benefit and income tax benefit | (315 | ) | ||||||
Minority interest benefit | 18 | |||||||
Income tax benefit | -- | |||||||
Net decrease in annual net income | $ | (297 | ) | |||||
Per share, basic and diluted | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||
(A) | Effective June 1, 2004, Wellsford/Whitehall entered into an interest rate protection contract for a notional amount of $122,100, which limits Wellsford/Whitehall's LIBOR exposure to 6.86% until December 31, 2006. The above calculation assumes exposure of 1.00% on the Company's proportionate share of debt based upon the in-effect 30-day LIBOR contract of 1.11% at June 30, 2004. |
(B) | For purposes of this disclosure, the balance of the investment in Clariborne Fordham will be presented as a fixed rate investment as the balance does not accrue interest and future earnings from this venture by the Company will be based upon future proceeds from sales of units and commercial phases, or other capital events. |
- 35 -
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in the Company's periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There have been no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its last evaluation.
Part II. Other Information:
Item 1: | Legal Proceedings. | ||||
The Company is not presently a party in any material litigation. | |||||
Item 2: | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds. | ||||
None. | |||||
Item 3: | Defaults upon Senior Securities. | ||||
The Company holds a 32.59% equity interest in Wellsford/Whitehall Group, L.L.C.
("Wellsford/Whitehall"). The manager of Wellsford/Whitehall has withheld required shortfall
payments (required payments in excess of lockbox receipts) on an existing $64,000,000 debt
obligation to Nomura Asset Capital Management (the "Nomura Loan") during the months of March,
April, May, June and July 2004. The payments not made aggregate approximately $2,429,000
through July 31, 2004. In addition to the payment shortfalls, the special servicer of the loan
has informed Wellsford/Whitehall and its manager that it is in violation of certain other
conditions in the loan agreement. As a result of the non-payment, additional default interest
of 5% per annum is effective from March 10, 2004. The Company does not have any role in the day-to-day management of Wellsford/Whitehall which is managed by an affiliate of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. ("Goldman Sachs"). Other affiliates of Goldman Sachs own an aggregate 60% equity interest in the venture. In July 2004, these default conditions were eliminated upon the transfer of six properties and assumption of the Nomura Loan by a newly formed partnership, unaffiliated with the Company or Wellsford/Whitehall. In addition, the payment of default interest was waived by the special servicer. |
Item 4: |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. | | ||
On June 29, 2004, the Company held its annual meeting of shareholders. A total of 6,334,076
common shares, representing approximately 98% of the 6,459,738 common shares outstanding and
entitled to vote (including 169,903 class A-1 common shares), as of the record date (April 27,
2004) were represented in person or by proxy vote and constituted a quorum. The Company's
common shares and class A-1 common shares are hereinafter referred to as the "Common Shares". At the meeting, Edward Lowenthal and David J. Neithercut were elected as directors to serve terms of three years expiring at the 2007 annual meeting of shareholders or, until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify. Each of the elected directors received the |
- 36 -
affirmative vote of at least 6,310,230 Common Shares. These elected directors join the
following existing directors until their terms expire: Jeffrey H. Lynford, Douglas Crocker II
and Mark S. Germain, whose terms expire in 2005 and Bonnie R. Cohen and Meyer "Sandy" Frucher,
whose terms expire in 2006. The shareholders also ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 by the affirmative vote of 6,281,553 Common Shares. Votes cast against the proposal were 52,298 Common Shares and 225 Common Shares abstained from voting. | ||
Item 5: | Other Information. | |
None. | ||
Item 6: | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. |
(a) | Exhibits filed with this Form 10-Q: | ||
Exhibit No. | Description | ||
3.1 | Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company (incorporated by
reference to an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-11 filed on November 14,
1997). | ||
3.2 |
Articles Supplementary classifying 350,000 Shares of Common Stock as Class A
Common Stock (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to
Form S-11 filed on November 14, 1997). | ||
3.3 |
Articles Supplementary classifying 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock as Series
A 8% Convertible Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to an
exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to Form S-11 filed on November 14, 1997). | ||
3.4 |
Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to Amendment
No. 1 to Form S-11 filed on November 14, 1997). | ||
10.65 |
Sale-Purchase Agreement, dated November 17, 2003, between Wellsford Capital
Properties, L.L.C. and Todd M. Strine for the sale of 421 Chestnut Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. | ||
10.66 |
First Amendment to Sale-Purchase Agreement, dated March 26, 2004, between
Wellsford Capital Properties, L.L.C. and Todd M. Strine for the sale of 421
Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. | ||
10.67 |
July 2004 Amendment to the Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement, dated
July 28, 2004, among Palomino Park Public Improvements Corporation, the
Company and Commerzbank AG. | ||
10.68 |
Redemption Agreement, dated July 2, 2004, by and among Wellsford/Whitehall Group, L.L.C. and the Individuals Named as the Saracen Members. | ||
31.1 |
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes -
Oxley Act of 2002. |
- 37 -
Exhibit No. | Description | ||
31.2 |
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32.1 |
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Certifications pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
(b) |
Reports on Form 8-K. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. filed the following reports on Form 8-K: |
Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event) |
Items Reported |
Date Filed |
---|---|---|
May 4, 2004 (May 4, 2004) |
The Company furnished under
Item 12, a copy of the press
release reporting the
results for the first
quarter ended March 31, 2004 |
May 4, 2004 |
April 13, 2004 (March 31, 2004) |
The Company filed under Item
5, a copy of the press
release reporting other
events for
Wellsford/Whitehall Group,
L.L.C. |
April 13, 2004 |
- 38 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
WELLSFORD REAL PROPERTIES, INC.
By: | /s/ James J. Burns James J. Burns Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | |
By: | /s/ Mark P. Cantaluppi Mark P. Cantaluppi Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer |
Dated: August 3, 2004
- 39 -
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
17 CFR 240.13a-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Jeffrey H. Lynford, Chief Executive Officer of Wellsford Real Properties, Inc., certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Wellsford Real Properties, Inc.; | |||
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; | |||
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: | |||
a. | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
b. | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
c. |
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): | |||
a. | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
b. | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 3, 2004
By: | /s/ Jeffrey H. Lynford Jeffrey H. Lynford Chief Executive Officer |
- 40 -
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
17 CFR 240.13a-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, James J. Burns, Chief Financial Officer of Wellsford Real Properties, Inc., certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Wellsford Real Properties, Inc.; | |||
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report; | |||
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report; | |||
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: | |||
a. | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; | |||
b. | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and | |||
c. |
disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and | |||
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): | |||
a. | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and | |||
b. | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 3, 2004
By: | /s/ James J. Burns James J. Burns Chief Financial Officer |
- 41 -
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the quarterly report of Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Jeffrey H. Lynford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and James J. Burns, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
/s/ Jeffrey H. Lynford Jeffrey H. Lynford Chief Executive Officer Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. | ||
/s/ James J. Burns James J. Burns Chief Financial Officer Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. |
August 5, 2004
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. and will be retained by Wellsford Real Properties, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- 42 -