Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
| |
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| |
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 |
| |
|
OR |
| |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
| |
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission File Number 000-50671
Liberty Media International, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
|
|
|
State of Delaware |
|
20-0893138 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
| |
12300 Liberty Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
80112
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(720) 875-5800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
none
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Series A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Series B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated
filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. Yes o No þ
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting
common equity held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to
the price at which the common equity was last sold, as of the
last business day of the registrant’s most recently
completed second fiscal quarter: $5,174,572,000.
The number of outstanding shares of Liberty Media
International, Inc.’s common stock as of
February 28, 2005 was:
165,514,962 shares of Series A common stock; and
7,264,300 shares of Series B common stock.
Portions of the definitive proxy statement of the
Registrant’s 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K.
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2004 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
|
|
|
(a) General Development of Business |
Through our subsidiaries and affiliates, we provide broadband
distribution services and video programming services to
subscribers in Europe, Japan, Latin America and Australia. Our
principal assets are UnitedGlobalCom, Inc., LMI/ Sumisho Super
Media, LLC, Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico Ltd. and
Pramer S.C.A., each a consolidated subsidiary as of
January 1, 2005, and our affiliate, Jupiter Programming
Co., Ltd.
Liberty Media International, Inc. (together with its
subsidiaries, “LMI”, “we”, “us”,
“our” or similar terms) was formed in March 2004 as a
wholly owned subsidiary of Liberty Media Corporation, which we
refer to as Liberty. Liberty transferred, and caused its other
subsidiaries to transfer to us, substantially all of the assets
comprising Liberty’s International Group, together with
cash and certain financial assets. On June 7, 2004, Liberty
distributed to its shareholders, on a pro rata basis, all of our
shares of common stock, which we refer to as the spin off, and
we became an independent, publicly traded company.
Recent Developments
On January 5, 2004, Liberty completed a transaction
pursuant to which the founding shareholders of UnitedGlobalCom,
Inc., which we refer to as UGC, transferred to Liberty
8.2 million shares of Class B common stock in exchange
for 12.6 million shares of Liberty’s common stock and
a cash payment. Upon closing of this exchange, the restrictions
contained in the existing standstill agreement between Liberty
and UGC on the amount of UGC’s stock that Liberty could
acquire and on the way Liberty could vote its shares of UGC
stock terminated and Liberty gained control of UGC.
Substantially all of Liberty’s direct and indirect interest
in UGC and related contract rights were transferred to us prior
to the spin off.
On January 12, 2004, Old UGC, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of UGC that principally owns UGC’s interests in
businesses in Latin America and Australia, filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code. Old UGC’s plan of reorganization, as amended, was
confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court on November 10, 2004, and
the restructuring of its indebtedness and other obligations
pursuant to the plan was completed on November 24, 2004.
In February 2004, UGC issued 83.0 million shares of its
Class A common stock, 2.3 million shares of its
Class B common stock and 84.9 million shares of its
Class C common stock pursuant to a fully subscribed rights
offering, resulting in gross proceeds to UGC of
$1.02 billion.
Also in February 2004, UPC Polska, Inc., an indirect subsidiary
of UGC, emerged from its U.S. bankruptcy proceedings. Pursuant
to UPC Polska’s plan of reorganization, claim holders
received aggregate consideration consisting of cash, new 9%
UPC Polska Notes due 2007 and 2.0 million shares of
UGC’s Class A common stock in exchange for
cancellation of their claims. On July 16, 2004, UPC Polska
redeemed the new 9% UPC Polska Notes at par plus accrued but
unpaid interest.
On April 6, 2004, UGC sold
€500 million
aggregate principal amount of its
13/4%
convertible senior notes due April 15, 2024. The
convertible notes are convertible into shares of UGC’s
Class A common stock at an initial conversion price of
€9.7561 per share.
On May 20, 2004, we made secured loans to and acquired all
of the issued and outstanding shares of Princes Holdings
Limited, pursuant to a restructuring under Irish insolvency laws
of the debt and other obligations of Princes Holdings and its
wholly owned subsidiary, Chorus Communication Limited. In
December 2004, we sold 100% of the equity of Princes Holdings to
a subsidiary of UGC for 6.4 million shares of UGC’s
Class A common stock.
In June 2004, UPC Broadband Holding B.V. (formerly UPC
Distribution Holding B.V.), an indirect subsidiary of UGC,
amended its senior secured credit facility, which we refer to as
the UPC Broadband Bank Facility, to add a new Facility E
term loan to replace the undrawn Facility D term loan.
Proceeds from
I-1
Facility E totaled
€1.0 billion,
which, in conjunction with
€450 million
of cash contributed indirectly by UGC, was used to repay some of
the indebtedness borrowed under the other tranches of the credit
facility, to redeem the 9% UPC Polska Notes referred to above
and to provide funding for the Noos acquisition described below.
In December 2004, the UPC Broadband Bank Facility was
amended to add a new Facility F term loan that increased
UPC Broadband’s average debt maturity and available
liquidity, and reduced its average interest margin. The
amendment consisted of a $525.0 million tranche and a
€140.0 million
tranche, totaling
€535.0 million
in gross proceeds. These proceeds were applied to (1) repay
€245.0 million
under the Facility A revolver (representing all then outstanding
amounts), (2) prepay
€101.2 million
of the term loan Facility B that matured in June 2006,
(3) prepay
€177.0 million
of Facility C debt and (4) pay transaction fees of
€11.8 million.
On March 8, 2005, the UPC Broadband Bank Facility was
further amended to permit indebtedness under:
(i) Facility G, a new
€1.0 billion
term loan facility further maturing in full on April 1,
2010; (ii) Facility H, a new
€1.5 billion
term loan facility maturing in full on September 1, 2012,
of which $1.25 billion was denominated in U.S. dollars and
then swapped into euros through a 7.5 year cross-currency
swap; and (iii) Facility I, a new
€500 million
revolving credit facility maturing in full on April 1,
2010. In connection with this amendment,
€167 million
of Facility A, the existing revolving credit facility, was
cancelled, reducing Facility A to a maximum amount of
€500 million.
The proceeds from Facilities G and H were used primarily to
prepay all amounts outstanding under existing term loan
Facilities B, C and E, to fund certain acquisitions and pay
transaction fees. The aggregate availability of
€1.0 billion
under Facilities A and I can be used to fund acquisitions
and for general corporate purposes. As a result of this
amendment, the weighted average maturity of the UPC Broadband
Bank Facility was extended from approximately 4 years to
approximately 6 years, with no amortization payments
required until 2010, and the weighted average interest margin on
the UPC Broadband Bank Facility was reduced by
approximately 0.25% per annum. The amendment also provided for
additional flexibility on certain covenants and the funding of
acquisitions.
On July 1, 2004, UPC Broadband France SAS, an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of UGC and the owner of UGC’s
French cable television operations, completed its acquisition of
Suez-Lyonnaise Telecom SA, which we refer to as Noos,
France’s largest cable operator, from Suez SA, a
French utility group, for cash and a 19.9% equity interest in
UPC Broadband France.
On July 19, 2004, our investment in Senior Notes and Senior
Discount Notes of Telewest Communications plc was converted into
approximately 7.5% of the outstanding common stock of Telewest
Global, Inc.
In August 2004, we issued 28.2 million shares of our
Series A common stock and 1.2 million shares of our
Series B common stock pursuant to a fully subscribed rights
offering, resulting in gross proceeds to us of
$739.4 million.
Also in August 2004, we, Sumitomo Corporation and Microsoft
Corporation effectively converted a portion of our respective
subordinated loans to Jupiter
Telecommunications Co., Ltd., which we refer to as
J-COM, into equity. Such conversions did not have a material
impact on our, Sumitomo’s or Microsoft’s respective
ownership interests in J-COM. In December 2004, J-COM repaid the
balance of these subordinated shareholder loans in cash.
Subsequent to the spin off, our management and Board of
Directors undertook a review of our assets and determined that
it would be advisable to monetize or dispose of our financial
assets and to consider disposing of other non-consolidated
non-cash-flow producing assets if opportunities arose.
Consistent with the foregoing, prior to December 31, 2004,
we sold all of our shares of Telewest Global and
4.5 million shares of Class A common stock of News
Corporation, Inc.
In October 2004, we also sold our 10% interest in Sky
Multi-Country and entered into agreements to sell our 10%
interest in each of Sky Brasil and Sky Mexico. Sky
Multi-Country, Sky Brasil and Sky Mexico, which we refer to
collectively as Sky Latin America, offer entertainment services
via satellite through owned and affiliated distribution
platforms in Latin America. The closing of the transfer of our
interests in Sky Brasil and Sky Mexico are subject to receipt of
regulatory approvals and other customary conditions.
I-2
Then, in November 2004, we entered into a put-call agreement
with respect to our right and obligation to subscribe for newly
issued shares of Cablevisión S.A., a cable television
operator in Argentina, in the event that Cablevisión’s
pending restructuring under local law of its debt and other
obligations is approved. Consummation of this transaction, which
occurred on March 2, 2005, resulted in the transfer of our
subscription right and obligation in consideration of a cash
payment, 50% of which was paid as a down payment in November
2004. Separately, the counterparty to our total return debt swap
with respect to certain bonds of Cablevisión, with our
consent, entered into a participation agreement with a third
party, which in January 2005 resulted in the termination of our
liability under the total return debt swap and the return of our
posted collateral.
On October 15, 2004, our indirect wholly owned subsidiary,
Belgian Cable Holdings, entered into an agreement to restructure
its investment in the debt of Cable Partners Europe, which we
refer to as CPE, and one of its two indirect majority-owned
subsidiaries, which we refer to as the InvestCos. In December
2004, two European subsidiaries of UGC acquired Belgian Cable
Holdings from us for cash. Thereafter, Belgian Cable Holdings
effected the debt restructuring by contributing cash and its
investment in the debt of one of the InvestCos to Belgian Cable
Investors, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of CPE, in
exchange for 78.4% of the common equity and 100% of the
preferred equity of Belgian Cable Investors. CPE owns the
remaining 21.6% of the common equity of Belgian Cable Investors.
Most of the proceeds of Belgian Cable Holdings’ investment
was then distributed by Belgian Cable Investors to CPE and used
by CPE to repurchase its debt held by Belgian Cable Holdings for
a purchase price approximately equal to Belgian Cable
Holdings’ cost of acquiring the CPE debt plus accrued
interest. Belgian Cable Investors holds an indirect 14.1%
interest in Telenet Group Holding N.V., Belgium’s
largest cable system operator in terms of number of subscribers.
In December 2004, a subsidiary of chellomedia BV, an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of UGC, entered into an agreement to
sell its 28.7% interest in EWT Holding GmbH to the other
investors in EWT Holding for cash. Chellomedia received 90% of
the purchase price on January 31, 2005 and the remaining
10% is due and payable no later than June 30, 2005.
On December 7, 2004, we purchased 3.0 million shares
of our Series A common stock from Comcast Corporation for
cash.
During 2004, our subsidiary Liberty Japan MC, LLC
acquired shares of the stock of Mediatti
Communications, Inc., a Japanese broadband provider of
cable and Internet access services, in a series of transactions
resulting in its holding an aggregate 37.3% interest in Mediatti
as of December 31, 2004. In December 2004, Sumitomo
Corporation acquired a net 6.9% interest in Liberty
Japan MC for a purchase price equal to the same percentage
of our investment in Mediatti. Sumitomo has the option until
February 2006 to increase its interest in Liberty Japan MC
to up to 50%, at a purchase price equal to the greater of the
then fair market value of the additional interests so acquired
and our investment in such interests.
Pursuant to a contribution agreement between Sumitomo and us, on
December 28, 2004, our approximate 45.45% equity interest
in J-COM and an approximate 19.78% equity interest in J-COM
owned by Sumitomo were combined in a holding company named LMI/
Sumisho Super Media, LLC, which we refer to as Super Media.
Subject to certain conditions, Sumitomo has the obligation to
contribute to Super Media substantially all of its remaining
12.25% equity interest in J-COM during 2005. On
February 18, 2005, J-COM announced an initial public
offering of its common shares in Japan. Under the terms of the
operating agreement of Super Media, our casting or tie-breaking
vote with respect to decisions of the management committee of
Super Media became effective upon this announcement. As a
result, we began accounting for Super Media and J-COM as
consolidated subsidiaries effective as of January 1, 2005.
If all of the J-COM shares offered for sale by J-COM in the
initial public offering are sold (including pursuant to the
underwriters’ over-allotment option), Super Media’s
equity interest in J-COM will be diluted to approximately 52.84%.
On January 17, 2005, chellomedia acquired an 87.5% interest
in Zone Vision Networks Ltd. from its current shareholders.
Zone Vision is a programming company that owns three pay
television channels and represents over 30 international
channels. The consideration for the transaction consisted of
cash and 1.6 million shares of UGC’s Class A
common stock, which are subject to a five-year vesting period.
As part of the transaction,
I-3
chellomedia will contribute to Zone Vision the 49% shareholding
it already holds in Reality TV Ltd. and chellomedia’s
Club channel business.
On January 17, 2005, we entered into an agreement and plan
of merger with UGC pursuant to which we each would merge with a
separate wholly owned subsidiary of a new parent company named
Liberty Global, Inc., which we have formed for purposes of
the mergers. In the mergers, each outstanding share of our
Series A common stock and Series B common stock would
be exchanged for one share of the corresponding series of
Liberty Global common stock. Stockholders of UGC (other than us
and our wholly owned subsidiaries) may elect to receive for each
share of UGC common stock owned either 0.2155 of a share of
Liberty Global Series A common stock (plus cash instead of
any fractional share interest) or $9.58 in cash. Cash elections
will be subject to proration so that the aggregate cash
consideration paid to UGC’s stockholders does not exceed
20% of the aggregate value of the merger consideration payable
to UGC’s public stockholders. Completion of the
transactions is subject, among other conditions, to approval of
both companies’ stockholders, including in the case of UGC,
the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the
UGC shares not beneficially owned by us, Liberty, any of our
respective subsidiaries or any of the executive officers or
directors of us, Liberty or UGC.
On February 10, 2005, UPC Broadband Holding, an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of UGC, acquired 100% of the shares in
Telemach d.o.o., a broadband communications provider in
Slovenia for cash.
On February 25, 2005, J-COM acquired the respective
interests of Sumitomo Corporation, Microsoft Corporation and us
in Chofu Cable, Inc., a small Japanese broadband communications
provider, for cash. As a result, J-COM acquired an approximate
92% equity interest in Chofu Cable.
* * * * *
Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. To the extent
that statements in this Annual Report are not recitations of
historical fact, such statements constitute forward-looking
statements, which, by definition, involve risks and
uncertainties. In particular, statements under Item 1.
Business, Item 2. Properties, Item 3. Legal
Proceedings, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk contain forward-looking statements. Where, in any
forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief
as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is
expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis,
but there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief
will result or be achieved or accomplished. The following
include some but not all of the factors that could cause actual
results or events to differ materially from those anticipated:
|
|
|
| |
• |
economic and business conditions and industry trends in the
countries in which we operate; |
| |
| |
• |
currency exchange risks; |
| |
| |
• |
consumer disposable income and spending levels, including the
availability and amount of individual consumer debt; |
| |
| |
• |
consumer acceptance of existing service offerings, including our
newer digital video, voice and Internet access services; |
| |
| |
• |
consumer acceptance of new technology, programming alternatives
and broadband services that we may offer; |
| |
| |
• |
our ability to manage rapid technological changes and grow our
digital video, voice and Internet access services; |
| |
| |
• |
the regulatory and competitive environment in the broadband
communications and programming industries in the countries in
which we, and the entities in which we have interests, operate; |
| |
| |
• |
continued consolidation of the foreign broadband distribution
industry; |
| |
| |
• |
uncertainties inherent in the development and integration of new
business lines and business strategies; |
I-4
|
|
|
| |
• |
the expanded deployment of personal video recorders and the
impact on television advertising revenue; |
| |
| |
• |
capital spending for the acquisition and/or development of
telecommunications networks and services; |
| |
| |
• |
uncertainties associated with product and service development
and market acceptance, including the development and provision
of programming for new television and telecommunications
technologies; |
| |
| |
• |
future financial performance, including availability, terms and
deployment of capital; |
| |
| |
• |
the ability of suppliers and vendors to timely deliver products,
equipment, software and services; |
| |
| |
• |
the outcome of any pending or threatened litigation; |
| |
| |
• |
availability of qualified personnel; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in, or failure or inability to comply with, government
regulations in the countries in which we operate and adverse
outcomes from regulatory proceedings; |
| |
| |
• |
government intervention that opens our broadband distribution
networks to competitors; |
| |
| |
• |
our ability to successfully negotiate rate increases with local
authorities; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in the nature of key strategic relationships with
partners and joint venturers; |
| |
| |
• |
uncertainties associated with our ability to comply with the
internal control requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; |
| |
| |
• |
competitor responses to our products and services, and the
products and services of the entities in which we have interests; |
| |
| |
• |
spending on foreign television advertising; and |
| |
| |
• |
threatened terrorist attacks and ongoing military action in the
Middle East and other parts of the world. |
You should be aware that the video, voice and Internet access
services industries are changing rapidly, and, therefore, the
forward-looking statements of expectations, plans and intent in
this Annual Report are subject to a greater degree of risk than
similar statements regarding certain other industries.
These forward-looking statements and such risks, uncertainties
and other factors speak only as of the date of this Annual
Report, and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking
to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking
statement contained herein, to reflect any change in our
expectations with regard thereto, or any other change in events,
conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
This Annual Report includes information concerning
UnitedGlobalCom, Inc., which files reports and other
information with the SEC in accordance with the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Information contained in this Annual
Report concerning UGC has been derived from the reports and
other information filed by it with the SEC. If you would like
further information about UGC, the reports and other information
it files with the SEC can be accessed on the Internet website
maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. Those reports and
other information are not incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report.
|
|
|
(b) Financial Information About Operating
Segments |
Financial information about our reportable segments appears in
note 20 to our consolidated financial statements included
in Part II of this report.
I-5
|
|
|
(c) Narrative Description of Business |
Overview
We offer a variety of broadband distribution services over our
cable television systems, including analog video, digital video,
Internet access and telephony. Available service offerings
depend on the bandwidth capacity of our cable systems and
whether they have been upgraded for two-way communications. In
select markets, we also offer video services through
direct-to-home satellite television distribution or
“DTH.” We operate our broadband distribution
businesses in Europe principally through UGC Europe, Inc.,
a subsidiary of UGC; in Japan principally through J-COM, a
subsidiary of Super Media; and in Latin America principally
through VTR GlobalCom S.A. a subsidiary of UGC, and
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico Ltd., which we refer to
as Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico. Each of UGC, Super Media and
Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico is currently our subsidiary.
I-6
The following table presents certain operating data, as of
December 31, 2004, with respect to the broadband
distribution systems of our subsidiaries in Europe, Japan and
Latin America. For purposes of this presentation, we refer to
Puerto Rico, the islands of the Caribbean and the countries of
Central and South America collectively as Latin America. This
table reflects 100% of the operational data applicable to each
subsidiary regardless of our ownership percentage.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Video(1) | |
|
Internet(1) | |
|
Telephony(1) | |
| |
|
|
|
Two-way | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Homes | |
|
Homes | |
|
Basic Cable | |
|
Digital Cable | |
|
DTH | |
|
MMDS | |
|
Homes | |
|
|
|
Homes | |
|
|
| |
|
Passed(2) | |
|
Passed(3) | |
|
Subscribers(4) | |
|
Subscribers(5) | |
|
Subscribers(6) | |
|
Subscribers(7) | |
|
Serviceable(8) | |
|
Subscribers(9) | |
|
Serviceable(10) | |
|
Subscribers(11) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Europe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Western Europe
|
|
|
9,528,600 |
|
|
|
7,463,300 |
|
|
|
5,191,200 |
|
|
|
725,100 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
|
7,453,600 |
|
|
|
1,042,000 |
|
|
|
4,044,100 |
|
|
|
424,600 |
|
| |
Central and Eastern Europe
|
|
|
4,552,200 |
|
|
|
1,739,800 |
|
|
|
2,618,100 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
245,100 |
|
|
|
32,200 |
|
|
|
1,733,100 |
|
|
|
178,500 |
|
|
|
415,600 |
|
|
|
68,900 |
|
|
Total Europe
|
|
|
14,080,800 |
|
|
|
9,203,100 |
|
|
|
7,809,300 |
|
|
|
725,100 |
|
|
|
245,100 |
|
|
|
121,200 |
|
|
|
9,186,700 |
|
|
|
1,220,500 |
|
|
|
4,459,700 |
|
|
|
493,500 |
|
|
Japan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J-COM**
|
|
|
6,287,800 |
|
|
|
6,276,200 |
|
|
|
1,482,600 |
|
|
|
232,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,276,200 |
|
|
|
708,600 |
|
|
|
5,799,200 |
|
|
|
726,500 |
|
|
Total Japan
|
|
|
6,287,800 |
|
|
|
6,276,200 |
|
|
|
1,482,600 |
|
|
|
232,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,276,200 |
|
|
|
708,600 |
|
|
|
5,799,200 |
|
|
|
726,500 |
|
|
Latin America:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
VTR GlobalCom
|
|
|
1,793,900 |
|
|
|
1,070,700 |
|
|
|
504,600 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
13,900 |
|
|
|
1,070,700 |
|
|
|
176,300 |
|
|
|
1,052,700 |
|
|
|
310,000 |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
82,200 |
|
|
|
45,700 |
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
15,300 |
|
|
|
45,700 |
|
|
|
4,300 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico
|
|
|
324,600 |
|
|
|
302,800 |
|
|
|
120,800 |
|
|
|
43,700 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
302,800 |
|
|
|
20,500 |
|
|
|
302,800 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
Total Latin America
|
|
|
2,200,700 |
|
|
|
1,419,200 |
|
|
|
637,800 |
|
|
|
43,700 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
29,200 |
|
|
|
1,419,200 |
|
|
|
201,100 |
|
|
|
1,355,500 |
|
|
|
319,000 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
22,569,300 |
|
|
|
16,898,500 |
|
|
|
9,929,700 |
|
|
|
1,000,800 |
|
|
|
249,600 |
|
|
|
150,400 |
|
|
|
16,882,100 |
|
|
|
2,130,200 |
|
|
|
11,614,400 |
|
|
|
1,539,000 |
|
I-7
|
|
|
| |
* |
Excludes systems owned by affiliates that were not consolidated
with UGC for financial reporting purposes as of
December 31, 2004 or that were acquired by UGC after
December 31, 2004. |
|
|
|
| |
** |
Excludes systems owned by affiliates that were not consolidated
with J-COM for financial reporting purposes as of
December 31, 2004 or that were acquired by J-COM after
December 31, 2004. Also excludes households to which J-COM
provides only retransmission services of terrestrial television
signals. |
|
|
| (1) |
In some cases, non-paying subscribers are counted by UGC as
subscribers during their free promotional service period. Some
of these subscribers choose to disconnect after their free
service period. The number of non-paying subscribers at
December 31, 2004 was immaterial. |
| |
| (2) |
Homes Passed are homes that can be connected to our networks
without further extending the distribution plant, except for DTH
and MMDS homes. With respect to DTH, we do not count homes
passed. With respect to MMDS, one home passed is equal to one
MMDS subscriber. |
| |
| (3) |
Two-way Homes Passed are homes passed by our networks where
customers can request and receive the installation of a two-way
addressable set-top converter, cable modem, transceiver and/or
voice port which, in most cases, allows for the provision of
video and Internet services and, in some cases, telephony
services. |
| |
| (4) |
Basic Cable Subscriber is comprised of basic cable video
customers (both analog and digital) that generally are counted
on a per connection basis. Except in the case of UGC,
residential multiple dwelling units with a discounted pricing
structure are counted on an equivalent bulk unit (EBU) basis.
Commercial contracts such as hotels and hospitals are counted by
all our subsidiaries on an EBU basis. EBU is calculated by
dividing the bulk price charged to accounts in an area by the
prevalent price charged to non-bulk residential customers in
that market for the comparable tier of service. UGC also has
“lifeline” customers (approximately 1.34 million
at December 31, 2004) that are counted on a per connection
basis, representing the least expensive regulated tier of basic
cable service, with only a few channels. |
| |
| (5) |
Digital Cable Subscriber is a customer with one or more digital
converter boxes that receives our digital video service. Each
Digital Cable Subscriber is included in the Basic Cable
Subscriber column of the above table whether such customer
receives only our digital video service or both analog and
digital video services. |
| |
| (6) |
DTH Subscriber is a home or commercial unit that receives our
video programming broadcast directly to the home via a
geosynchronous satellite. |
| |
| (7) |
MMDS Subscriber is a home or commercial unit that receives our
video programming via a multipoint microwave
(wireless) distribution system. |
| |
| (8) |
Internet Homes Serviceable are homes that can be connected to
our networks, where customers can request and receive Internet
access services. |
| |
| (9) |
Internet Subscriber is a home or commercial unit with one or
more cable modems connected to our networks, where a customer
has requested and is receiving high-speed Internet access
services. |
|
|
| (10) |
Telephony Homes Serviceable are homes that can be connected to
our networks, where customers can request and receive voice
services. |
| |
| (11) |
Telephony Subscriber is a home or commercial unit connected to
our networks, where a customer has requested and is receiving
voice services. |
We own programming networks that provide video programming
channels to multi-channel distribution systems owned by us and
by third parties. We also represent programming networks owned
by others. Our programming networks distribute their services
through a number of distribution technologies, principally cable
television and DTH. Programming services may be delivered to
subscribers as part of a video distributor’s basic package
of programming services for a fixed monthly fee, or may be
delivered as a “premium” programming service for an
additional monthly charge or on a pay-per-view basis. Whether a
I-8
programming service is on a basic or premium tier, the
programmer generally enters into separate affiliation
agreements, providing for terms of one or more years, with those
distributors that agree to carry the service. Basic programming
services derive their revenue from per-subscriber license fees
received from distributors and the sale of advertising time on
their networks or, in the case of shopping channels, retail
sales. Premium services generally do not sell advertising and
primarily generate their revenue from subscriber fees.
Programming providers generally have two sources of content:
(1) rights to productions that are purchased from various
independent producers and distributors, and (2) original
productions filmed for the programming provider by internal
personnel or contractors. We operate our programming businesses
in Europe principally through the chellomedia division of UGC;
in Japan principally through our affiliate Jupiter
Programming Co., Ltd., which we refer to as JPC; and in
Latin America principally through our subsidiary,
Pramer S.C.A.
Operations
|
|
|
Europe — UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. |
Our European operations are conducted primarily through
UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. At December 31, 2004, we owned
an approximate 53.6% common equity interest, representing an
approximate 91.0% voting interest, in UGC. UGC is one of the
largest broadband communications providers, in terms of
aggregate number of subscribers and homes passed, outside the
United States. UGC provides video distribution services and/or
Internet access and telephony services in 16 countries worldwide.
UGC’s European operations are conducted through its wholly
owned subsidiary, UGC Europe, Inc., which provides services in
13 countries in Europe. UGC Europe’s operations are
currently organized into two principal divisions: UPC Broadband
and chellomedia. Through its UPC Broadband division, UGC Europe
provides video, high-speed Internet access and telephony
services over its networks and operates the largest cable
network in each of The Netherlands, France, Austria, Poland,
Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic and Slovenia and the
second largest cable network in Norway, in each case in terms of
number of subscribers. UGC Europe’s high-speed
Internet access service is provided over the UPC Broadband
network infrastructure generally under the brand name chello.
Depending on the capacity of the particular network, UGC Europe
may provide up to seven tiers of high-speed Internet access. For
information concerning the chellomedia division, see
“— chellomedia and Other.”
Provided below is country-specific information with respect to
the broadband distribution services of the UPC Broadband
division:
UGC Europe’s networks in The Netherlands, which we refer to
as UGC-Netherlands, passed approximately 2.6 million homes
and had approximately 2.3 million basic cable subscribers,
397,400 Internet subscribers and 182,100 telephony subscribers
as of December 31, 2004. Over 30% of Dutch households
receive at least analog cable service from UGC-Netherlands.
UGC-Netherlands’ subscribers are located in six regional
clusters, including the major cities of Amsterdam and Rotterdam.
Its networks are approximately 95% upgraded to two-way
capability, with approximately 94% of its basic cable
subscribers served by a network with a bandwidth of at least
860 MHz.
UGC-Netherlands provides analog cable services to approximately
87% of its homes passed. Approximately 82% of
UGC-Netherlands’ homes passed are capable of receiving
digital cable service. UGC-Netherlands offers its digital cable
subscribers a basic package of 58 channels with an option
to subscribe for up to 15 additional general entertainment,
movie, sports, music and ethnic channels and an electronic
program guide. UGC-Netherlands’ digital cable service also
offers 56 channels of near-video-on-demand, or “NVOD”,
services and interactive services, including television-based
email, to approximately 57% of its homes passed.
UGC-Netherlands offers seven tiers of chello brand high-speed
Internet access service with download speeds ranging from
256 Kbps to 8 Mbps. Approximately 17% of its basic
cable subscribers also receive its Internet access service,
representing approximately 100% of its Internet subscribers.
I-9
Multi-feature telephony services are available from
UGC-Netherlands to approximately 86% of its homes passed.
Approximately 8% of its basic cable subscribers also receive its
telephony services, representing approximately 100% of its
telephony subscribers. In 2004, UGC-Netherlands began offering
telephony services to its two-way homes passed by applying
Voice-over-Internet Protocol or “VoIP.”
In early 2004, UGC-Netherlands launched self-install for all of
its Internet access services, allowing subscribers to install
the technology themselves and save money on the installation
fee. UGC-Netherlands also launched self-install for its digital
cable services in June 2004. Approximately 50% of its new
Internet subscribers have chosen to self-install their new
service, and approximately 30% of its new digital subscribers
have chosen to self-install their new service.
UGC Europe’s networks in France (including Noos), which we
refer to as UGC-France, passed approximately 4.6 million
homes and had 1.5 million basic cable subscribers,
247,100 Internet subscribers and 66,600 telephony
subscribers as of December 31, 2004. Its major operations
are located in Paris and its suburbs including the Marne la
Vallee area east of Paris, Strasbourg, Orleans, Le Mans,
the suburbs of Lyon, the southeast region, and other operations
spread throughout France. Its network is approximately 72%
upgraded to two-way capability, with approximately 90% of its
basic cable subscribers served by a network with a bandwidth of
at least 750 MHz.
In 2004, UGC-France extended the reach of its digital cable
platform, which is now available to approximately 90% of its
homes passed. The digital platform offers a number of options in
terms of packages — from 52 channels for the
entry-level tier to more than 100 channels for the premium
tier. Programming includes series, general entertainment, youth,
sports, news, documentary, music, lifestyle and foreign
channels. With all tiers, UGC-France offers a number of movie
premium packages, a pay-per-view service, numerous
“a la carte” channels and several Canal+
channels. UGC-France intends to migrate most of its analog cable
subscribers to this new digital platform.
UGC-France offers three tiers of chello and Noos brand
high-speed Internet access service with download speeds ranging
from 512 Kbps to 10 Mbps. Approximately 12% of its
basic cable subscribers also receive Internet service,
representing approximately 75% of its Internet subscribers.
Multi-feature telephony services are available from UGC-France
to approximately 15% of its homes passed.
Suez SA owns a 19.9% equity interest in UGC-France. Subject to
the terms of a call option, the indirect wholly owned subsidiary
of UGC that holds the remaining 80.1% equity interest in
UGC-France, which we refer to as UGC France Holdco, has the
right through June 30, 2005 to purchase from Suez all of
its equity interest in UGC-France for
€85,000,000,
subject to adjustment, plus interest. The purchase price may be
paid in cash, shares of UGC’s Class A common stock or
shares of our Series A common stock. Subject to the terms
of a put option, Suez may require UGC France Holdco to
purchase Suez’s equity interest in UGC-France at specified
times prior to or after July 1, 2007, July 1, 2008 or
July 1, 2009 for the then fair market value of such equity
interest or assist Suez in obtaining an offer to purchase its
equity interest in UGC-France. UGC France Holdco also has the
option to purchase Suez’s equity interest in UGC-France
during specified periods shortly after July 1, 2007,
July 1, 2008 and July 1, 2009 at the then fair market
value of such equity interest, payable in cash or shares of our
or UGC’s common stock.
UGC Europe’s networks in Austria, which we refer to as
UGC-Austria, passed 946,900 homes and had
501,400 basic cable subscribers, 242,500 Internet
subscribers and 152,500 telephony subscribers as of
December 31. 2004. UGC-Austria’s subscribers are
located in regional clusters encompassing the capital city of
Vienna, two other regional capitals and two smaller cities. Each
of the cities in which it operates owns, directly or indirectly,
5% of the local operating company of UGC-Austria.
UGC-Austria’s network is almost entirely upgraded to
two-way capability, with approximately 97% of its basic cable
subscribers served by a network with a bandwidth of at least
750 MHz.
I-10
UGC-Austria provides a single offering to its analog cable
subscribers that consists of 34 channels, mostly in the German
language. UGC-Austria’s digital platform offers more than
100 basic and premium TV channels, plus NVOD, interactive
services, television-based e-mail and an electronic program
guide. UGC-Austria’s premium content includes first run
movies and specific ethnic offerings, including Serb and Turkish
channels.
UGC-Austria offers five tiers of chello brand high-speed
Internet access service with download speeds ranging from 256
Kbps to 2.6 Mbps. UGC-Austria’s high-speed Internet
access is available in all of the cities in its operating area.
Approximately 37% of its basic cable subscribers also receive
its Internet access service, representing approximately 76% of
its Internet subscribers.
Multi-feature telephony services are available from UGC-Austria
to approximately 96% of its homes passed. UGC-Austria offers
basic dial tone service as well as value-added services.
UGC-Austria also offers a bundled product of fixed line and
mobile telephony services in cooperation with the third largest
mobile phone operator in Austria under the brand “Take
Two.” More than 100,000 of its telephony subscribers
subscribe to this product. Approximately 22% of
UGC-Austria’s basic cable subscribers also receive its
telephony service, representing approximately 72% of its
telephony subscribers.
UGC Europe’s networks in Norway, which we refer to as
UGC-Norway, passed 486,600 homes and had 341,000 basic
cable subscribers, 48,500 Internet subscribers and
22,900 telephony subscribers as of December 31, 2004.
Its main network is located in Oslo and its other systems are
located primarily in the southeast and along Norway’s
southwestern coast. UGC-Norway’s networks are approximately
50% upgraded to two-way capability, with approximately 30% of
its basic cable subscribers served by a network with a bandwidth
of at least 860 MHz. Digital cable services are offered to
approximately 39% of UGC-Norway’s homes passed.
UGC-Norway has a basic analog cable package with 15 channels and
a plus-package with 23 channels. UGC-Norway’s highest
analog tier, the total package, includes the plus-package and
12 additional channels. Customers can also subscribe to
premium channels, such as movie, sports and ethnic channels.
Approximately 60% of UGC-Norway’s basic cable subscribers
consist of multi-dwelling units, or “MDUs”, with a
discounted pricing structure.
UGC-Norway’s basic digital cable package consists of
29 channels. Its upper-level digital package includes an
additional 21 channels. Subscribers to the basic digital
cable package can subscribe to channels from the upper-level
digital package for an additional fee. Different movie, sports,
entertainment and ethnic channels may be selected from an a la
carte menu for a per-channel fee. To complement its digital
offering, UGC-Norway launched 48 channels of NVOD service
in 2004.
UGC-Norway offers five tiers of chello brand high-speed Internet
access service with download speeds ranging from 256 Kbps
to 4 Mbps. Approximately 14% of its basic cable subscribers
also receive its Internet service, representing approximately
100% of its Internet subscribers.
Multi-feature telephony services are available from UGC-Norway
to approximately 31% of its homes passed. Approximately 7% of
its basic cable subscribers also receive telephony service,
representing approximately 100% of its telephony subscribers.
UGC Europe’s network in Sweden, which we refer to as
UGC-Sweden, passed 421,600 homes and had 292,300 basic
cable subscribers and 76,000 Internet subscribers as of
December 31, 2004. It operates in the greater Stockholm
area on leased fiber from Stokab AB, a city controlled
entity with exclusive rights to lay cable ducts for
communications or broadcast services in the city of Stockholm.
These lease terms vary from 10 to 25 years, and expire
beginning in 2012 through 2018. Its network is approximately 67%
upgraded to two-way capability, with all of its basic cable
subscribers served by a network with a bandwidth of at least
550 MHz.
I-11
UGC-Sweden provides all of its basic cable subscribers with a
lifeline service consisting of four “must-carry”
channels. In addition to this lifeline service, UGC-Sweden
offers an analog cable package with 12 channels and a
digital cable package with up to 80 channels. Its program
offerings include domestic, foreign, sport and premium movie
channels, as well as digital event channels such as seasonal
sport and real life entertainment events. Approximately 39% of
the homes served by UGC-Sweden’s network subscribe to the
lifeline analog cable service only. Approximately 13% of its
basic cable subscribers are digital cable subscribers. To
complement its digital offering, UGC-Sweden launched
24 channels of NVOD service in 2004.
UGC-Sweden offers five tiers of chello brand high-speed Internet
access service with download speeds ranging from 128 Kbps
to 8 Mbps. Approximately 26% of its basic cable subscribers
subscribe to its Internet service, representing approximately
100% of its Internet subscribers.
UGC Europe’s network in Ireland, which we refer to as
UGC-Ireland, or Chorus, passed 317,300 homes and had
112,900 basic cable subscribers, 89,000 MMDS
subscribers, 600 Internet subscribers and
500 telephony subscribers as of December 31, 2004.
UGC-Ireland is Ireland’s largest cable and MMDS video
service provider outside of Dublin, based on customers served.
UGC-Ireland also distributes four Irish channels and produces a
local sports channel.
UGC Europe’s network in Belgium, which we refer to as
UGC-Belgium, passed 155,500 homes and had 134,900 basic
cable subscribers and 29,900 Internet subscribers as of
December 31, 2004. Its operations are located in certain
areas of Leuven and Brussels, the capital city of Belgium.
UGC-Belgium’s network is fully upgraded to two-way
capability, with all of its basic cable subscribers served by a
network with a bandwidth of 860 MHz.
UGC-Belgium’s analog cable service, consisting of all
Belgium terrestrial channels, regional channels and selected
European channels, offers 41 channels in Brussels and
39 channels in Leuven. In both regions, UGC-Belgium offers
an expanded analog cable package, including a “starters
pack” of three channels that can be upgraded to
15 channels in Leuven and 17 channels in Brussels.
This programming generally includes a selection of European and
United States thematic satellite channels, including sports,
kids, nature, movies and general entertainment channels.
UGC-Belgium also distributes three premium channels that are
provided by Canal+, two in Brussels and one in Leuven.
UGC-Belgium offers five tiers of chello brand high-speed
Internet access service with download speeds ranging from
256 Kbps to 16 Mbps. Approximately 12% of its basic
cable subscribers also receive Internet access service,
representing approximately 56% of its Internet subscribers.
Through its indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Belgian Cable
Holding, UGC Europe holds 78.4% of the common equity and
100% of the preferred equity of Belgian Cable
Investors, L.L.C. Cable Partners Europe LLC, which we
refer to as CPE, owns the remaining 21.6% of the common equity
of Belgian Cable Investors. Belgian Cable Investors in turn
holds an indirect 14.1% economic interest in Telenet Group
Holding NV, and certain call options, expiring in 2007 and
2009, to acquire 11.6% and 17.6% respectively, of the
outstanding equity of Telenet from existing shareholders.
Belgian Cable Investors’ indirect 14.1% interest in Telenet
results from its majority ownership of two entities, which we
refer to as the InvestCos, that hold in the aggregate 18.99% of
the common stock of Telenet, and a shareholders agreement among
Belgian Cable Investors and three unaffiliated investors in the
InvestCos that governs the voting and disposition of 21.36% of
the common stock of Telenet, including the stock held by the
InvestCos. Telenet is Belgium’s largest cable system
operator in terms of number of subscribers.
Pursuant to the agreement with CPE governing Belgian Cable
Investors, CPE has the right to require Belgian Cable Holdings
to purchase all of CPE’s interest in Belgian Cable
Investors for the appraised fair value of such interest during
the first 30 days of every six-month period beginning in
December 2007. Belgian Cable Holdings has the corresponding
right to require CPE to sell all of its interest in Belgian
Cable Investors to
I-12
Belgian Cable Holdings for appraised fair value during the first
30 days of every six-month period following December 2009.
UGC Europe’s networks in Poland, which we refer to as
UGC-Poland, passed approximately 1.9 million homes and had
approximately 1 million basic cable subscribers and
53,400 Internet subscribers as of December 31, 2004.
UGC-Poland’s subscribers are located in regional clusters
encompassing eight of the ten largest cities in Poland,
including Warsaw and Katowice. Approximately 30% of its networks
are upgraded to two-way capability, with approximately 96% of
its basic cable subscribers served by a network with a bandwidth
of at least 550 MHz. UGC-Poland continues to upgrade
portions of its network that have bandwidths below 550 MHz
to bandwidths of at least 860 MHz.
UGC-Poland offers analog cable subscribers three packages of
cable television service. Its lowest tier, the broadcast
package, includes 4 to 12 channels and the intermediate
package includes 13 to 22 channels. The higher tier, the
full package, includes the broadcast package plus up to 30
additional channels with such themes as sports, kids,
science/educational, news, film and music. For an additional
monthly charge, UGC-Poland offers two premium television
services, the HBO Poland service and Canal+ Multiplex, a
Polish-language premium package of three movie, sport and
general entertainment channels.
UGC-Poland offers three different tiers of chello brand
high-speed Internet access service in portions of its network
with download speeds ranging from 512 Kbps to 6 Mbps.
UGC-Poland is currently expanding its Internet ready network in
Warsaw, Krakow, Gdansk and Katowice and began providing Internet
access services in Szczecin and Lublin in the second quarter of
2004. Approximately 5% of its basic cable subscribers also
receive its Internet service, representing approximately 88% of
its Internet subscribers.
UGC Europe’s networks in Hungary, which we refer to as
UGC-Hungary, passed approximately 1 million homes and had
720,900 basic cable subscribers, 140,400 DTH
subscribers, 73,200 Internet subscribers and
68,900 telephony subscribers, as of December 31, 2004.
Approximately 67% of its networks are upgraded to two-way
capability, with 50% of its basic cable subscribers served by a
network with a bandwidth of at least 750 MHz.
UGC-Hungary offers up to four tiers of analog cable programming
services (between 4 and 60 channels) and two premium
channels, depending on the technical capability of the network.
Programming consists of the national Hungarian terrestrial
broadcast channels and selected European satellite and local
programming that consists of proprietary and third party
channels.
UGC-Hungary offers three tiers of chello brand high-speed
Internet access service with download speeds ranging from
512 Kbps to 3 Mbps. UGC-Hungary offers these broadband
Internet services to 69,200 subscribers in fourteen cities,
including Budapest. It also had 4,000 asymmetric digital
subscriber line, or “ADSL”, subscribers at
December 31, 2004. Approximately 6% of its basic cable
subscribers also receive its Internet service, representing
approximately 55% of its Internet subscribers.
Monor Telefon Tarsasag Rt., one of UGC-Hungary’s
operating companies, offers traditional switched telephony
services over a twisted copper pair network in the southeast
part of Pest County. In 2004, UGC-Hungary began offering
VoIP telephony services over its cable network in Budapest.
As of December 31, 2004, UGC-Hungary had
68,900 telephony subscribers.
UGC Europe’s network in the Czech Republic, which we refer
to as UGC-Czech, passed 729,000 homes and had
295,700 basic cable subscribers, 90,100 DTH
subscribers and 42,400 Internet subscribers as of
December 31, 2004. Its operations are located in more than
80 cities and towns in the Czech Republic, including Prague
and Brno, the two largest cities in the country. Approximately
44% of its networks are upgraded to two-way capability, with 40%
of its basic cable subscribers served by a network with a
bandwidth
I-13
of at least 750 MHz. UGC-Czech offers two tiers of analog
cable programming services, with up to 31 channels, and two
premium channels.
UGC-Czech offers four tiers of chello brand high-speed Internet
access service with download speeds ranging from 256 Kbps
to 6 Mbps. Approximately 9% of its basic cable subscribers
also receive its Internet service, representing approximately
64% of its Internet subscribers.
UGC Europe’s networks in Romania, which we refer to as
UGC-Romania, passed 518,700 homes and had
357,000 basic cable subscribers, as of December 31,
2004. UGC-Romania’s systems served 34 cities in
Romania with 75% of its subscriber base in six cities:
Timisoara, Cluj, Ploiesti, Focsani, Bacau and Botosani.
UGC-Romania is currently test marketing, on a limited basis, an
Internet access product in two of its main systems.
Approximately 1% of its networks are upgraded to two-way
capability, with 75% of its basic cable subscribers served by a
network with a bandwidth of at least 550 MHz. UGC-Romania
continues to upgrade its medium size systems to 550 MHz.
UGC-Romania offers analog cable service with 24 to
36 channels in all of its cities, which include Romanian
terrestrial broadcast channels, European satellite programming
and regional local programming. Three extra basic packages of 6
to 18 channels each are offered in Timisoara, Ploiesti,
Cluj and Bacau. Premium Pay TV (HBO Romania) is offered in
13 cities.
UGC Europe’s network in the Slovak Republic, which we refer
to as UGC-Slovak, passed 413,200 homes and had
250,300 basic cable subscribers, 14,600 DTH
subscribers, 32,200 MMDS subscribers and
9,200 Internet subscribers as of December 31, 2004.
Approximately 41% of its networks are upgraded to two-way
capability, with 25% of its basic cable subscribers served by a
network with a bandwidth of at least 750 MHz. In some areas
like Bratislava, the capital city, its network is 98% upgraded
to two-way capability.
UGC-Slovak offers two tiers of analog cable service and three
premium services. Its lower-tier, the lifeline package, includes
4 to 9 channels. UGC-Slovak’s most popular tier, the
basic package, includes 16 to 42 channels that generally
offer all Slovak terrestrial, cable and local channels, selected
European satellite programming and other third-party
programming. For an additional monthly charge, UGC-Slovak offers
three premium services — HBO, Private Gold and the
UPC Komfort package consisting of six thematic third-party
channels.
In Bratislava, UGC-Slovak offers five tiers of chello brand
high-speed Internet access service with download speeds ranging
from 256 Kbps to 4 Mbps. Approximately 3% of its basic
cable subscribers also receive Internet access service,
representing approximately 85% of its Internet subscribers.
UGC Europe’s network in Slovenia, acquired in February
2005, which we refer to as UGC-Slovenia, is the largest
broadband communications provider in Slovenia in terms of number
of subscribers, with over 100,000 basic cable subscribers and
10,000 Internet subscribers at December 31, 2004.
UGC-Slovenia offers analog cable service and one premium movie
service. UGC-Slovenia’s most popular tier, the basic
package, includes on average 50 video and 20 radio
channels and generally offers all Slovenian terrestrial, cable
and local channels, selected European satellite programming and
other third-party programming. For an additional monthly charge,
UGC-Slovenia offers one premium movie service.
UGC-Slovenia offers five tiers of high-speed Internet access
service with download speeds ranging from 128 Kbps to
2 Mbps.
I-14
UGC Europe’s chellomedia division provides interactive
digital products and services, produces and markets thematic
channels, operates UGC Europe’s digital media center,
operates a competitive local exchange carrier business under the
brand name Priority Telecom and owns or manages UGC’s
investments in various businesses in Europe. Below is a
description of the operations of the chellomedia division:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Interactive Services. We expect the development of
interactive television services to play an important role in
increasing subscriptions to UGC Europe’s digital television
offerings. The chellomedia division’s Interactive Services
Group is responsible for developing its core digital products,
such as an electronic program guide, walled garden,
television-based email, and PC/ TV portals as well as other
television and PC-based applications supporting various areas,
including communications services and enhanced television
services. A base set of interactive services has been launched
by UGC-Netherlands and UGC-Austria, as discussed above. |
| |
| |
• |
Transactional Television. Transactional television,
branded as “Arrivo,” is another component of UGC
Europe’s digital service offerings. UGC-Netherlands
currently offers 42 channels of NVOD programming and UGC-Austria
currently offers 56 channels of NVOD programming. Arrivo
provides digital customers with a wide range of Hollywood
blockbusters and other movies. Arrivo is also in the process of
developing video-on-demand, or “VOD”, services for UGC
Europe’s UPC Broadband division and third-party cable
operators. The VOD service will provide VOD subscribers with
enhanced playback functionality and will give subscribers access
to a broad array of on-demand programming, including movies,
live events, local drama, music videos, kids programming and
adult programming. |
| |
| |
• |
Pay Television. UPCtv, a wholly owned subsidiary of
UGC Europe, produces and markets its own pay television
products, currently consisting of three thematic channels. The
channels target the following genres: extreme sports and
lifestyles; women’s information and entertainment; and real
life documentaries. All three channels originate from
UGC Europe’s digital media center, or “DMC,”
located in Amsterdam. The DMC is a technologically advanced
production facility that services UPCtv and third-party clients
with channel origination, post-production and satellite and
fiber transmission. The DMC delivers high-quality, customized
programming by integrating different video elements, languages
(either in dubbed or sub-titled form) and special effects, then
transmits the final product to various customers in numerous
countries through affiliated and unaffiliated cable systems and
DTH platforms. |
| |
| |
• |
Priority Telecom. Priority Telecom is a facilities-based
business telecommunications provider that provides voice
services, high-speed Internet access, private data networks and
customized network services to over 7,000 business
customers primarily in its core metropolitan markets in The
Netherlands, Austria and Norway. UGC Europe owns an approximate
72% economic interest in Priority Telecom. |
| |
| |
• |
Investments. Chellomedia is an investor in branded equity
ventures for the development of country-specific programming,
including Iberian Programming Services, Xtra Music,
MTV Networks Polska, Fox Kids Poland and Sports 1. In
January 2005, chellomedia acquired an 87.5% interest in Zone
Vision Networks Ltd. Zone Vision owns and operates three
thematic programming channels, Reality TV, Europa Europa
and Romantica, which are broadcast in over
125 countries in 18 languages, and represents over
30 international programming channels. Zone Vision’s
minority shareholders have the right to put 60% of their 12.5%
shareholding to chellomedia on the third anniversary, and 100%
of their shareholding on the fifth anniversary, of completion of
the transaction. Chellomedia has corresponding call rights. The
price payable upon exercise of the put or call will be the fair
market value of the shareholdings purchased. |
|
|
| |
Chellomedia also owns or manages UGC’s minority interests
in other European businesses. These include a 25% interest in
PrimaCom AG, which owns and operates a cable television and
broadband network in Germany and The Netherlands; a 50% interest
in Melita Cable PLC, the only cable television and broadband
network in Malta; a 25% interest in Telewizyjna Korporacja
Partycypacyjna |
I-15
|
|
| |
S.A., a DTH programming platform in Poland; and the recently
acquired indirect investment in Telenet Group Holding NV through
Belgian Cable Investors. |
|
|
|
Standstill Agreement with UGC. |
We have entered into a standstill agreement with UGC pursuant to
which we may not acquire more than 90% of UGC’s outstanding
common stock unless we make an offer or otherwise effect a
transaction to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of
UGC not already owned by us. Under certain circumstances, such
an offer or transaction would require an independent appraisal
to determine the price to be paid to shareholders unaffiliated
with our company. In addition, we are entitled to preemptive
rights with respect to certain issuances of UGC common stock.
We also own approximately 27% of the outstanding shares of The
Wireless Group plc, which represents an approximate 22% economic
interest. The Wireless Group is a commercial radio group in the
United Kingdom that operates talkSPORT, a nationwide commercial
radio station dedicated to sports, in addition to local and
regional stations in North West England, South Wales and
Scotland.
UGC owns an approximate 19% equity interest in SBS
Broadcasting S.A., a European commercial television and
radio broadcasting company.
Our Japanese operations are conducted primarily through LMI/
Sumisho Super Media, LLC and its subsidiary Jupiter
Telecommunications Co., Ltd., and through Jupiter
Programming Co., Ltd. As of December 31, 2004, we
owned a 69.68% ownership interest in Super Media and Super Media
owned a 65.23% ownership interest in J-COM. As a result of a
change in governance of Super Media that occurred on
February 18, 2005, we began accounting for Super Media and
J-COM as consolidated subsidiaries, effective as of
January 1, 2005. As of December 31, 2004, we owned a
50% ownership interest in our affiliate JPC.
|
|
|
Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd. |
J-COM is a leading broadband provider of bundled entertainment,
data and communication services in Japan. J-COM is currently the
largest multiple-system operator, or “MSO”, in Japan,
as measured by the total number of homes passed and customers.
J-COM operates its broadband networks through 19 managed local
cable companies, which J-COM refers to as its managed
franchises, 16 of which were consolidated subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004. J-COM owned a 45% equity interest and a
50% equity interest in two of its three unconsolidated managed
franchises and had no equity interest in the remaining managed
franchise, Chofu Cable, Inc., as of December 31, 2004. On
February 25, 2005, J-COM acquired an aggregate 92%
ownership interest in Chofu Cable, including an approximate 31%
ownership interest acquired from us. As of December 31,
2004, J-COM’s three unconsolidated managed franchises
(including Chofu Cable) served approximately 139,800 basic
cable subscribers, 52,800 Internet subscribers and
46,500 telephony subscribers.
Eighteen of J-COM’s managed franchises are clustered around
three metropolitan areas of Japan, consisting of the Kanto
region (which includes Tokyo), the Kansai region (which includes
Osaka and Kobe) and the Kyushu region (which includes Fukuoka
and Kita-Kyushu). In addition, J-COM owns and manages a local
franchise in the Sapporo area of Japan that is not part of a
cluster.
Each managed franchise consists of headend facilities receiving
television programming from satellites, traditional terrestrial
television broadcasters and other sources, and a distribution
network composed of a combination of fiber-optic and coaxial
cable, which transmits signals between the headend facility and
the customer locations. Almost all of J-COM’s networks are
upgraded to two-way capability, with all of its cable
subscribers served by a system with a bandwidth of 750 or
770 MHz. J-COM provides its managed franchises with
experienced personnel, operating and administrative services,
sales and marketing, training, programming and equipment
procurement assistance and other management services. Each of
J-COM’s managed franchises
I-16
uses J-COM’s centralized customer management system to
support sales, customer and technical services, customer call
centers and billing and collection services.
J-COM offers analog and digital cable services in all of its
managed franchises. J-COM’s basic analog service consists
of approximately 47 channels of cable programming, not
including premium services. A typical channel line-up includes
popular channels in the Japanese market such as Movie
Plus, a top Japanese movie channel, the Shop Channel,
a home-shopping network, J Sports 1, 2 and 3, three
popular sports channels, the Discovery Channel, the Golf
Network, the Disney Channel and Animal Planet,
in addition to retransmission of analog terrestrial and
satellite television broadcasts. J-COM’s basic digital
service currently includes approximately 59 channels of cable
programming, not including audio and data channels and premium
services. The channel line-up for the basic digital service is
generally similar to the channel line-up for the basic analog
service, but digital broadcasts can be offered in
high-definition television format. For an additional fee,
digital cable subscribers may also receive up to
9 pay-per-view channels not available to J-COM’s
analog cable subscribers. J-COM also offers both its basic
analog and digital subscribers optional subscriptions for an
additional fee to premium channels, including movies, sports,
horseracing and other special entertainment programming, either
individually or in packages. J-COM offers package discounts to
customers who subscribe to bundles of J-COM services. In
addition to the services offered to its cable television
subscribers, J-COM also provides terrestrial broadcast
retransmission services to approximately 3.0 million
additional households in its managed franchises as of
December 31, 2004.
J-COM offers high-speed Internet access in all of its managed
franchises through its wholly owned subsidiary,
@NetHome Co., Ltd, and through its affiliate, Kansai
Multimedia Services. J-COM holds a 25.8% interest in Kansai
Multimedia, which provides high-speed Internet access in the
Kansai region of Japan. These Internet access services offer
downstream speeds of either 8 Mbps or 30 Mbps. At
December 31, 2004, approximately 37% of the basic cable
subscribers in J-COM’s consolidated managed franchises also
received Internet service, representing approximately 77% of the
Internet subscribers in such franchises.
J-COM currently offers telephony services over its own network
in 14 of its consolidated franchise areas. In these franchise
areas, J-COM’s headend facilities contain equipment that
routes calls from the local network to J-COM’s telephony
switches, which in turn transmit voice signals and other
information over the network. J-COM currently provides a single
line to the majority of its telephony customers, most of whom
are residential customers. J-COM charges its telephony
subscribers a flat fee for basic telephony service (together
with charges for calls made) and offers additional premium
services, including call-waiting, call-forwarding, caller
identification and three way calling, for a fee. At
December 31, 2004, approximately 38% of the basic cable
subscribers in J-COM’s consolidated managed franchises also
received telephony service, representing approximately 78% of
the telephony subscribers in such franchises. In February 2005,
J-COM started a trial telephony service using VoIP technology in
its Sapporo franchise.
In addition to its 19 managed franchises, J-COM owns
non-controlling equity interests, between 5.5% and 20.4%, in
three cable franchises and an MSO that are operated and managed
by third-party franchise operators.
J-COM sources its programming through multiple suppliers
including its affiliate, JPC. J-COM’s relationship with JPC
enables the two companies to work together to identify and bring
key programming genres to the Japanese market and to expedite
the development of quality programming services. J-COM and JPC
each currently owns a 50% interest in Jupiter VOD Co.,
Ltd., a joint venture formed in 2004 to obtain video-on-demand,
or “VOD”, programming content to offer VOD services to
J-COM franchises. J-COM began offering VOD services to its
digital customers on a trial basis in 2004 and anticipates
rolling-out VOD service in all of its franchises in 2005.
Because J-COM is usually a programmer’s largest cable
customer in Japan, J-COM is generally able to negotiate
favorable terms with its programmers.
Our interest in J-COM is currently held through Super Media, an
entity that is owned 69.68% by us and 30.32% by Sumitomo
Corporation. Pursuant to a contribution agreement between
Sumitomo and us, on December 28, 2004, our 45.45% ownership
interest in J-COM and a majority of Sumitomo’s 32%
ownership interest in J-COM were combined in Super Media. Prior
to the contribution agreement closing, Super Media was our
wholly owned subsidiary and owned a portion of our ownership
interest in J-COM. At closing of the
I-17
contribution agreement, our remaining ownership interest in
J-COM owned by four of our other subsidiaries and a 19.78%
ownership interest in J-COM owned by Sumitomo were contributed
to Super Media, bringing Super Media’s total ownership
interest in J-COM to 65.23% as of the contribution closing date.
Subject to certain conditions, Sumitomo has the obligation to
contribute substantially all of its remaining 12.25% ownership
interest in J-COM to Super Media during 2005. Also, Sumitomo and
we are generally required to contribute to Super Media any
additional shares of J-COM that either of us acquires and to
permit the other party to participate in any additional
acquisition of J-COM shares during the term of Super Media.
Our interest in Super Media is held through five separate
corporations, four of which are wholly owned. Several
individuals, including two of our executive officers and one of
our directors, own common stock representing an aggregate of 20%
of the common equity in the fifth corporation, which owns an
approximate 5.4% interest in J-COM through its ownership in
Super Media.
Super Media is managed by a management committee consisting of
two members, one appointed by us and one appointed by Sumitomo.
Effective upon J-COM’s announcement on February 18,
2005 of an initial public offering of its common shares in
Japan, the management committee member appointed by us has a
casting or tie-breaking vote with respect to any management
committee decision that we and Sumitomo are unable to agree on
(with the exception of the terms of any initial public offering
of J-COM shares), which casting vote will remain in effect for
the term of Super Media. Certain decisions with respect to Super
Media require the consent of both members rather than the
management committee. These include a decision to engage in any
business other than holding J-COM shares, sell
J-COM shares, issue additional units in Super Media, make
in-kind distributions or dissolve Super Media, in each case
other than as contemplated by the Super Media operating
agreement.
Because of our casting vote, we indirectly control J-COM through
our control of Super Media, which owns a controlling interest in
J-COM, and therefore consolidate J-COM’s results of
operations for accounting purposes. Super Media will be
dissolved five years after our casting vote became effective
unless Sumitomo and we mutually agree to extend the term. Super
Media may also be dissolved earlier under certain circumstances.
Our other primary partner in J-COM is Microsoft Corporation,
which held a 19.5% beneficial ownership interest in J-COM as of
December 31, 2004. Super Media has succeeded to all of our
rights and substantially all of Sumitomo’s rights under the
current J-COM stockholders agreement with Microsoft, which
agreement continues in effect until the earlier to occur of an
initial public offering of J-COM shares or February 12,
2008. Pursuant to that agreement, each of Super Media, Sumitomo
and Microsoft have granted to the other a right of first offer
with respect to any transfer of our respective interests in
J-COM to a third party. Microsoft also has tag-along rights with
respect to certain sales of J-COM stock by Super Media, and
Super Media has drag-along rights as to Microsoft with respect
to certain sales of its J-COM stock. Super Media is also
entitled to certain preemptive rights with respect to any new
issuance of J-COM securities.
While Super Media effectively has the ability to elect
J-COM’s entire board, Super Media, Sumitomo and Microsoft
have agreed, pursuant to the J-COM stockholders agreement
described above, to vote their respective shares in favor of the
election to J-COM’s board of two non-executive directors
designated by Microsoft. Microsoft also has the right to
challenge certain types of transactions and to require review by
an independent advisor based on specified criteria. Pursuant to
the Super Media Operating Agreement, Super Media is required to
vote its J-COM shares in favor of the election to J-COM’s
board of three non-executive directors designated by Sumitomo
and three non-executive directors designated by us.
|
|
|
Jupiter Programming Co., Ltd. |
JPC is a joint venture between Sumitomo and us that primarily
develops, manages and distributes pay television services in
Japan on a platform-neutral basis through various distribution
infrastructures, principally cable and DTH service providers. As
of December 31, 2004, JPC owned five channels through
wholly or majority-owned subsidiaries and had investments
ranging from approximately 10% to 50% in eleven additional
channels. JPC’s majority owned channels are a movie channel
(Movie Plus), a golf channel (Golf Network), a
shopping channel (Shop Channel, in which JPC has a 70%
interest and Home Shopping Network has a 30%
I-18
interest), a women’s entertainment channel (LaLa
TV), and a video game information channel (Channel
BB). Channels in which JPC holds investments include three
sports channels owned by J Sports Broadcasting Corporation, a
43% owned joint venture with News Television B.V., Sony
Broadcast Media Co. Ltd, Fuji Television Network, Inc. and
SOFTBANK Broadmedia Corporation; Animal Planet Japan, a
one-third owned joint venture with Discovery and BBC Worldwide;
Discovery Channel Japan, a 50% owned joint venture with
Discovery; and AXN Japan, a 35% owned joint venture with
Sony. JPC provides affiliate sales services and in some cases
advertising sales and other services to channels in which it has
an investment for a fee.
The market for multi-channel television services in Japan is
highly complex with multiple cable systems and direct-to-home
satellite platforms. Cable systems in Japan served approximately
17.0 million homes at December 31, 2004. A large
percentage of these homes, however, are served by systems
(referred to as compensation systems) whose service principally
consists of retransmitting free TV services to homes whose
reception of such broadcast signals has been blocked. Higher
capacity systems and larger cable systems that offer a full
complement of cable and broadcast channels, of which J-COM is
the largest in terms of subscribers, currently serve
approximately 5.4 million households. The majority of
channels in which JPC holds an interest are marketed as basic
television services to cable system operators, with distribution
at December 31, 2004 ranging from approximately
14.4 million homes for Shop Channel (which is
carried in many compensation systems and on VHF as well as in
multi-channel cable systems) to approximately 1.9 million
homes for more recently launched channels, such as Animal
Planet Japan. Channel BB, which was acquired by JPC in
December 2004, has negligible cable distribution.
Each of the channels in which JPC has an interest is also
currently offered on SkyPerfecTV1, a digital satellite platform
that delivers approximately 180 channels a la carte and in an
array of basic and premium packages, from two satellites
operated by JSAT Corporation. Each of the channels, except for
Channel BB, is also offered on SkyPerfecTV2, another satellite
platform in Japan, which delivers a significantly smaller number
of channels. Under Japan’s complex regulatory scheme for
satellite broadcasting, a person engaged in the business of
broadcasting programming must obtain a broadcast license that is
perpetual, although subject to revocation by the relevant
governmental agency, and then lease from a satellite operator
the bandwidth capacity on satellites necessary to transmit the
programming to cable and other distributors and direct-to-home
satellite subscribers. In the case of distribution of JPC’s
33% or greater owned channels on SkyPerfecTV1, these licenses
and satellite capacity leases are held through its subsidiary,
Jupiter Satellite Broadcasting Corporation, or “JSBC,”
except for AXN Japan, Channel BB and the J Sports
Broadcasting channels which hold their own licenses. The
broadcast licenses and satellite capacity leases for those of
JPC’s 33% or greater owned channels that are delivered by
SkyPerfecTV2 are held by four other companies that are majority
owned by unaffiliated entities. JSBC’s leases with JSAT for
bandwidth capacity on JSAT’s two satellites expire between
2006 and 2011. The leases for bandwidth capacity with respect to
the SkyPerfecTV2 platform expire between 2012 and 2014. JSBC and
other licensed broadcasters then contract with the platform
operator, such as SkyPerfecTV, for customer management and
marketing services (sales and marketing, billing and collection)
and for encoding services (compression, encoding and
multiplexing of signals for transmission) on behalf of the
licensed channels. The majority of channels in which JPC holds
an interest are marketed as basic television services to DTH
subscribers with distribution at December 31, 2004 ranging
from 3.2 million homes for Shop Channel (which is
carried as a free service to all DTH subscribers) to 281,000
homes for more recently launched channels, such as Animal
Planet Japan.
Approximately 83% of JPC’s consolidated revenue for 2004
was attributable to retail revenue generated by the Shop
Channel. Cable operators are paid distribution fees to carry
the Shop Channel, which are either fixed rate per
subscriber fees or the greater of fixed rate per subscriber fees
and a percentage of revenue generated through sales to the cable
operator’s viewers. SkyPerfecTV is paid fixed rate per
subscriber distribution fees to provide the Shop Channel
to its DTH subscribers. After Shop Channel, the J
Sports Broadcasting channels generate the most revenue of the
channels in which JPC has an interest. The majority of this
revenue is derived from cable and satellite subscriptions.
Currently, advertising sales are not a significant component of
JPC’s revenue.
I-19
Sumitomo and we each own a 50% interest in JPC. Pursuant to a
stockholders agreement we entered into with JPC and Sumitomo,
Sumitomo and we each have preemptive rights to maintain our
respective equity interests in JPC, and Sumitomo and we each
appoint an equal number of directors provided we maintain our
equal ownership interests. No board action may be taken with
respect to certain material matters without the unanimous
approval of the directors appointed by us and Sumitomo, provided
that Sumitomo and we each own 30% of JPC’s equity at the
time of any such action. Sumitomo and we each hold a right of
first refusal with respect to the other’s interests in JPC,
and Sumitomo and we have each agreed to provide JPC with a right
of first opportunity with respect to the acquisition of more
than a 10% equity position in, or the management of or any
similar participation in, any programming business or service in
Japan and any other country to which JPC distributes its
signals, in each case subject to specified limitations.
At December 31, 2004, we also owned an approximate 35%
indirect ownership interest in Mediatti Communications, Inc.
Mediatti is a provider of cable television and high speed
Internet access services in Japan that served approximately
91,500 basic cable subscribers and 50,500 Internet subscribers
at December 31, 2004. Our interest in Mediatti is held
through Liberty Japan MC, LLC, a company of which we own
approximately 93.1% and Sumitomo Corporation owns approximately
6.9%. Sumitomo has the option until February 2006 to increase
its ownership interest in Liberty Japan MC to up to 50%.
Liberty Japan MC owns a 36.4% voting interest in Mediatti
Communications and an additional 0.87% interest that has limited
veto rights. Liberty Japan MC has the option until February 2006
to acquire from Mediatti up to 9,463 additional Mediatti shares
at a price of ¥290,000 per share. If such option is fully
exercised, Liberty Japan MC’s interest in Mediatti will be
approximately 46%. The additional interest that Liberty Japan MC
has the right to acquire may initially be in the form of
non-voting Class A shares, but it is expected that any
Class A shares owned by Liberty Japan MC will be converted
to voting common stock.
Liberty Japan MC, Olympus Mediacom L.P. and two minority
shareholders of Mediatti have entered into a shareholders
agreement pursuant to which Liberty Japan MC has the right to
nominate three of Mediatti’s seven directors and which
requires that significant actions by Mediatti be approved by at
least one director nominated by Liberty Japan MC.
The Mediatti shareholders who are party to the shareholders
agreement have granted to each other party whose ownership
interest is greater than 10%, a right of first refusal with
respect to transfers of their respective interests in Mediatti.
Each shareholder also has tag-along rights with respect to such
transfers. Olympus Mediacom has a put right that is first
exercisable during July 2008 to require Liberty Japan MC to
purchase all of its Mediatti shares at fair market value. If
Olympus exercises such right, the two minority shareholders who
are party to the shareholders agreement may also require Liberty
Japan MC to purchase their Mediatti shares at fair market value.
If Olympus does not exercise such right, Liberty Japan MC has a
call right that is first exercisable during July 2009 to require
Olympus and the minority shareholders to sell their Mediatti
shares to Liberty Japan MC at fair market value. If both the
Olympus put right and the Liberty Japan MC call right expire
without being exercised during the first exercise period, either
may thereafter exercise its put or call right, as applicable,
until October 2010.
We also own minority interests in broadband distributors and
video programmers operating in Australia. UGC owns an indirect
approximate 34% equity interest in Austar United Communications
Ltd. Austar United provides pay television services, Internet
access and mobile telephony services to subscribers in regional
and rural Australia and the capital cities of Hobart and Darwin.
In addition, we own an approximate 20% equity interest in
Premium Movie Partnership, which supplies three premium
movie-programming channels to the major subscription television
distributors in Australia. PMP’s partners include Showtime,
Twentieth Century Fox, Sony Pictures, Paramount Pictures and
Universal Studios.
I-20
Our Latin American operations are conducted primarily through
VTR GlobalCom S.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of UGC, and our
wholly owned subsidiaries Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico
Ltd. and Pramer S.C.A. UGC also has subsidiaries that are
broadband providers operating in Brazil and Peru.
Many countries in Latin America have experienced ongoing
recessionary conditions during the past five years. Among these
countries, Argentina, in which certain of LMI’s businesses
offer programming services, may have been the most harshly
affected. Argentina has experienced severe economic and
political volatility since 2001. Effective January 2002, the
Argentine government eliminated the historical exchange rate of
one Argentine peso to one U.S. dollar (the “peg
rate”). The value of the Argentine peso dropped
significantly on the date the peg rate was eliminated and
dropped further through 2002. As a result, our businesses in
Argentina have experienced significant negative effects on their
financial results. In many cases, their customers reduced
spending or extended payments, while their lenders tightened
credit criteria. We cannot predict how much longer these
recessionary conditions will last, nor can we predict the future
impact of these conditions on the financial results of our
businesses that operate in Latin America.
UGC’s primary Latin American operation, VTR GlobalCom S.A.,
which we refer to as VTR, is Chile’s largest multi-channel
television and high-speed Internet access provider in terms of
homes passed and number of subscribers, and Chile’s second
largest provider of residential telephony services, in terms of
lines in service. VTR provides services in Santiago,
Chile’s largest city, the large regional cities of Iquique,
Antofagasta, Concepción, Viña del Mar, Valparaiso and
Rancagua, and smaller cities across Chile. Approximately 96% of
its video subscribers are served via wireline cable, with the
remainder via MMDS technologies. VTR’s network is
approximately 60% upgraded to two-way capability, with 65% of
its basic cable subscribers served by a network with a bandwidth
of at least 750 MHz. VTR has an approximate 70% market
share of cable television services throughout Chile and an
approximate 51% market share within Santiago.
VTR’s channel lineup consists of 52 to 68 channels
segregated into two tiers of analog cable service: a basic
service with 52 to 57 channels and a premium service with 11
channels. VTR offers basic tier programming similar to the basic
tier program lineup in the United States, including more
premium-like channels such as HBO, Cinemax and Cinecanal on the
basic tier. As a result, subscription to its existing premium
service package is limited because its basic analog package
contains similar channels. VTR obtains programming from the
United States, Europe, Argentina and Mexico. Domestic cable
television programming in Chile is only just beginning to
develop around local events such as soccer matches.
VTR offers several alternatives of always on, unlimited-use
high-speed Internet access to residences and small/home offices
under the brand name Banda Ancha in 22 communities within
Santiago and 12 cities outside Santiago. Subscribers can
purchase one of five services with download speeds ranging from
128 Kbps to 2.4 Mbps. For a moderate to heavy Internet
user, VTR’s Internet service is generally less expensive
than a dial-up service with its metered usage. To provide more
flexibility to the user, VTR also offers Banda Ancha Flex, where
a low monthly flat fee includes the first 200 minutes, with
metered usage above 200 minutes. Approximately 33% of VTR’s
basic cable subscribers also receive Internet service,
representing approximately 95% of its Internet subscribers.
VTR offers telephony service to customers in 22 communities
within Santiago and seven cities outside Santiago. VTR offers
basic dial tone service as well as several value-added services.
VTR primarily provides service to residential customers who
require one or two telephony lines. It also provides service to
small businesses and home offices. In 2004, VTR began offering
telephony services to its two-way homes passed by applying VoIP.
Approximately 40% of VTR’s basic cable subscribers also
receive telephony service, representing approximately 65% of its
telephony subscribers.
On January 23, 2004, we, Liberty and CristalChile
Comunicaciones S.A., our partner in Metrópolis-Intercom
S.A., a cable operator in Chile, entered into an agreement
pursuant to which each agreed to use its respective commercially
reasonable efforts to combine the businesses of Metrópolis
and VTR, in an effort to facilitate the
I-21
provision of enhanced services to cable and telecommunications
consumers in the Chilean marketplace. The combination is subject
to certain conditions, including the execution of definitive
agreements, Chilean regulatory approval, the approval of our
board of directors and the boards of directors of CristalChile,
VTR and UGC (including, in the case of UGC, the independent
members of UGC’s board of directors) and the receipt of
necessary third party approvals and waivers. The Chilean
antitrust authorities approved the combination in October 2004.
An action was filed with the Chilean Supreme Court seeking to
reverse such approval, but the action was dismissed on
March 10, 2005. We, CristalChile and UGC are currently
negotiating the terms of the definitive agreements for the
combination. If the proposed combination is consummated as
contemplated, UGC will own 80% of the voting and equity rights
in the combined entity, CristalChile will own the remaining 20%
and we will receive a promissory note from the combined entity.
CristalChile will have the right to elect 1 of the 5 members of
the combined entity’s board and will have veto rights over
certain material decisions for so long as CristalChile owns at
least a 10% equity interest in the combined entity. In addition,
CristalChile will have a put right which will allow CristalChile
to require UGC to purchase all, but not less than all, of its
interest in the combined entity at the fair market value of the
interest, subject to a minimum price, which put right will end
on the tenth anniversary of the combination. Liberty has agreed
to perform UGC’s obligations under CristalChile’s put
if UGC does not do so. We have agreed to indemnify Liberty
against its obligations with respect to CristalChile’s put
right.
|
|
|
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico Ltd. |
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico Ltd., our wholly owned
subsidiary, is one of Puerto Rico’s largest cable
television operators based on number of subscribers. Liberty
Cablevision of Puerto Rico operates three head ends, serving the
communities of Luquillo, Arecibo, Florida, Caguas, Humacao,
Cayey and Barranquitas and 30 other municipalities. In portions
of its network, Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico also offers
high speed Internet access and cable telephony services. Liberty
Cablevision of Puerto Rico’s network is approximately 94%
upgraded to two-way capability, with all of its basic cable
subscribers served by a system with a bandwidth of at least
550 MHz.
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico provides subscribers with 61
analog channels. Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico also offers
48 digital channels, 46 premium channels, 46 pay-per-view
channels and 33 digital music channels. Liberty Cablevision of
Puerto Rico obtains programming primarily from international
sources, including suppliers from the United States.
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico offers four tiers of
high-speed Internet access with download speeds ranging from 64
Kbps to 1.5 Mbps. Approximately 14% of Liberty Cablevision of
Puerto Rico’s basic cable subscribers also receive Internet
service, representing approximately 82% of its Internet
subscribers.
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico has begun offering telephony
service using IP-based technology. Currently, 7% of Liberty
Cablevision of Puerto Rico’s basic cable subscribers also
receive telephony service, representing approximately 95% of its
telephony subscribers.
Pramer S.C.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of LMI, is an Argentine
programming company which supplies programming services to cable
television and DTH satellite distributors in Latin America and
Spain. At December 31, 2004, Pramer owned or had an equity
interest in 11 channels and produced, marketed, distributed or
otherwise represented 12 additional channels, including two of
Argentina’s five terrestrial broadcast stations.
Subscription units for 2004 ranged from approximately 24,000 for
the smallest premium service to approximately 9.6 million
for the most popular basic service. Pramer’s wholly owned
channels include Canal (a), the first Latin-American
quality arts channel, Film & Arts, offering quality
films, concerts, operas and interviews with artists,
elgourmet.com, a channel for the lovers of “the good
things in life,” and Magic Kids, an entertainment
children’s channel, all of which are offered as basic
television services. Pramer’s represented channels include
Hallmark and Cosmopolitan Channel (in which we own
a 50% interest through another subsidiary).
I-22
Pramer’s affiliation agreements with cable television and
satellite distributors provide for payments based on the number
of subscribers that receive Pramer’s services.
Cablevisión S.A., an Argentine cable provider, represented
approximately 13% of Pramer’s consolidated revenue for
2004. Pramer’s affiliation agreement with Cablevisión
expired in December 2004. The parties have agreed to extend this
agreement until June 30, 2005 with Cablevisión paying
Pramer a fixed monthly fee which represents an approximate 35%
discount from the applicable fees in 2004. During this period,
the parties will seek to negotiate a new affiliation agreement.
Pramer handles affiliate sales for the 12 channels it represents
and advertising sales for 6 of such channels. Pramer collects
the revenue for the represented channels and pays the channel
owners either a fixed fee or a fee based on amounts collected.
Pramer’s representation of the Hallmark channel,
including the provision of satellite uplinking and other
services, accounted for approximately 9% of Pramer’s
consolidated revenue for 2004. The representation agreement for
the Hallmark channel expires on December 31, 2005,
subject to earlier termination under certain circumstances.
Pramer has two sources of content: rights that are purchased
from various distributors and its own productions. Pramer’s
own productions are usually contracted with independent
producers.
All of Pramer’s satellite transponder capacity is provided
pursuant to contracts expiring in 2014.
Our 50% owned affiliate, Metrópolis-Intercom S.A. is
Chile’s second largest cable operator based on the number
of subscribers served. Metrópolis operates cable systems in
nine of the most densely populated cities within Chile,
including Santiago (the capital of Chile), Viña del Mar,
Concepción and Temuco. At December 31, 2004,
Metrópolis served approximately 224,800 basic cable
subscribers, 38,200 Internet subscribers and 10,800 telephony
subscribers.
CristalChile Comunicaciones S.A., a large publicly traded
Chilean company with significant media interests, and we each
own a 50% interest in Metrópolis. The board of directors of
Metrópolis consists of eight members. CristalChile and we
each designate one-half of the directors of Metrópolis and
almost all actions by the board require the consent of
representatives of each partner. LMI has given CristalChile the
right to control the day-to-day operations of Metrópolis.
As discussed under “— VTR GlobalCom S.A.”
above, we, Liberty and CristalChile have entered into an
agreement pursuant to which each has agreed to use its
commercially reasonable efforts to combine the businesses of
Metrópolis and VTR. The combination is subject to certain
conditions. If the combination does not occur, we and
CristalChile have each agreed to fund its pro rata share of a
capital call sufficient to retire Metrópolis’ local
debt facility, and to amend the existing agreement governing the
parties’ relationship with respect to Metrópolis.
Among other things, our approval rights as an owner of
Metrópolis will be limited to certain material matters,
including material related party transactions, but will not
include the adoption of budgets or business plans or the making
of capital calls. CristalChile will have a call right with
respect to our interest in Metrópolis, subject to a minimum
price, and for so long as CristalChile owns directly or
indirectly 50% or more of the shares of Metrópolis,
CristalChile will have a drag-along right, subject to a minimum
purchase price, with respect to our interest in Metrópolis
in connection with a bona fide sale of all of its and its
affiliates’ direct interest in Metrópolis. We will
have tag-along rights in connection with sales by CristalChile
or its affiliates of any of their direct interests in
Metrópolis. Neither party will have a put right to the
other party of its interest in Metrópolis.
Our majority owned subsidiary, Liberty Programming Argentina,
LLC, owns a 40% equity interest in Torneos y Competencias, an
independent producer of Argentine sports and entertainment
programming that, through various affiliates, operates a sports
programming cable channel; commercializes rights to televise
sporting events via cable, satellite and broadcast television,
and manages two sports magazines and several thematic soccer
bars. We also own a 10.6% equity interest in Fox Pan American
Sports LLC, a joint venture that develops and operates multiple
Spanish language subscription television and radio services
comprised predominantly of sports programming. Fox Pan American
Sports is a principal customer of Torneos.
I-23
Regulatory Matters
Video distribution, Internet, telephony and content businesses
are regulated in each of the countries in which we operate. The
scope of regulation varies from country to country, although in
some significant respects regulation in European markets is
harmonized under the regulatory structure of the European Union
or “EU.” Adverse regulatory developments could subject
our businesses to a number of risks. Regulation could limit
growth, revenue and the number and types of services offered. In
addition, regulation may restrict our operations and subject
them to further competitive pressure, including pricing
restrictions, interconnect and open-network obligations, and
restrictions on content, including content provided by third
parties. Failure to comply with current or future regulation
could expose our businesses to various penalties.
Foreign regulations affecting distribution and programming
businesses fall into several general categories. Our businesses
are required to obtain licenses, permits or other governmental
authorizations from (or to notify or register with) relevant
local or regulatory authorities to own and operate their
respective distribution systems. In many countries, these
licenses are non-exclusive and of limited duration. In some
countries where we provide video programming services, we must
comply with restrictions on programming content. Local or
national regulatory authorities in some countries where we
provide video services also impose pricing restrictions and
subject certain price increases to approval by the relevant
local or national authority.
Our telecommunications businesses generally are required to
register with the appropriate regulatory authority where we
offer telephony services, although, in some instances, we may be
required to obtain a license. Our telephony businesses to date
have not been subject to rate regulation but could become
subject to such regulation in a number of jurisdictions if they
are deemed to hold significant market power. Under the EU’s
new regulatory framework discussed below, a company will be
deemed to have significant market power if it has the power to
behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors,
customers and consumers. In some countries, we must notify the
regulatory authority of our tariff structure and any subsequent
price increases.
Austria, Belgium, Cyprus, The Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy,
Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Poland,
Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United
Kingdom are Member States of the European Union or EU. As such,
these countries are required to enact national legislation that
implements EU directives. Although not an EU Member State,
Norway is a member of the European Economic Area and generally
has implemented or is implementing the same principles on the
same timetable as EU Member States. In addition, Romania is
seeking to join the EU in 2007 and its laws are strongly
influenced by EU directives since it will need to comply with
these directives in order to join the EU. As a result, most of
the markets in Europe in which our businesses operate have been
significantly affected by the regulatory framework that has been
developed by the EU.
|
|
|
Communications Services and Competition Directives |
A number of legal measures, which we refer to as the Directives,
have revised the regulatory regime concerning communications
services across the EU. They include the following:
|
|
|
| |
• |
Directive for a New Regulatory Framework for Electronic
Communications Networks and Services (referred to as the
Framework Directive); |
| |
| |
• |
Directive on the Authorization of Electronic Communications
Networks and Services (referred to as the Authorization
Directive); |
| |
| |
• |
Directive on Access to and Interconnection of Electronic
Communications Networks and Services (referred to as the Access
Directive); |
I-24
|
|
|
| |
• |
Directive on Universal Service and Users’ Rights relating
to Electronic Networks and Services (referred to as the
Universal Service and Users’ Rights Directive); |
| |
| |
• |
Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications (referred to
as the Privacy Directive); and |
| |
| |
• |
Directive on Competition in the Markets for Electronic
Communications and Services (referred to as the Competition
Directive). |
In addition to the Directives, the European Parliament and
European Council made a decision intended to ensure the
efficient use of radio spectrum within the EU. Existing EU
member countries were required to implement the Framework,
Authorization, Access and the Universal Service and Users’
Rights Directives by July 25, 2003. The Privacy Directive
was to have been implemented by October 31, 2003. The
Competition Directive is self-implementing and does not require
any national measures to be adopted. The 10 countries that
joined the EU on May 1, 2004 were to ensure compliance with
the Directives as of the date of accession. Measures seeking to
implement the Directives are in force in most Member States. Of
those countries that we operate in only Belgium and the Czech
Republic still need to bring into force laws seeking
substantially to implement the Directives.
The Directives seek, among other things, to harmonize national
regulations and licensing systems and further increase market
competition. These policies seek to harmonize licensing
procedures, reduce administrative fees, ease access and
interconnection, and reduce the regulatory burden on
telecommunications companies. Another important objective of the
new Directives is to implement one new regime for the
development of communications networks and communications
services, including the delivery of video services, irrespective
of the technology used.
Many of the obligations included within the Directives apply
only to operators or service providers with “Significant
Market Power” in a relevant market. For example, the
provisions of the Access Directive allow Member States to
mandate certain access obligations only for those operators and
service providers that are deemed to have Significant Market
Power. For purposes of the Directives, an operator or service
provider will be deemed to have Significant Market Power where,
either individually or jointly with others, it enjoys a position
of significant economic strength affording it the power to
behave to an appreciable extent independently of competitors,
customers and consumers. As part of the implementation of
certain of the Directives, the National Regulatory Authority or
NRA is obliged to analyze 18 predefined markets to determine if
any operator or service provider has Significant Market Power.
We may be found to have Significant Market Power in some markets
and in some countries. In particular, in those markets where we
offer telephony services, we may be found to have Significant
Market Power in the termination of calls on our own network. In
addition, in some countries we may be found to have Significant
Market Power in the wholesale distribution of television
channels. Some national regulators may also seek to find that we
have Significant Market Power in the retail broadband Internet
market. Although we would vigorously dispute this last finding,
there can be no assurance that such finding will not be made. In
the event that we are found to have Significant Market Power in
any particular market, a NRA could impose certain conditions on
us to prevent abusive behavior by us.
The European Commission has adopted a Recommendation on relevant
markets susceptible to ex-ante regulation under the Directives.
Under the Directives, the European Commission has the power to
veto the assessment by a NRA of Significant Market Power in any
market not set out in this Recommendation as well as any finding
by a NRA of Significant Market Power in any market whether or
not it is set out in the Recommendation.
Certain key elements introduced by the Directives are set forth
below, followed by a discussion of certain other regulatory
matters and a description of regulation for three countries
where we have large operations. This is not intended to be a
comprehensive description of all aspects of regulation in this
area.
Licensing. Individual licenses for electronic
communications services are not required for the operation of an
electronic communications network or the offering of electronic
communications services. A simple registration is required in
these cases. Member States are limited in the obligations that
they may place on someone
I-25
who has so registered; the only obligations that may be imposed
are specifically set out in the Authorizations Directive.
Access Issues. The Access Directive sets forth the
general framework for interconnection of, and third party access
to, networks, including cable networks. Public
telecommunications network operators are required to negotiate
interconnection agreements on a non-discriminatory basis with
each other. In addition, some specific obligations are provided
for in this Directive such as an obligation to distribute
wide-screen television broadcasts in that format and certain
requirements to provide access to conditional access systems.
Other access obligations can be imposed on operators identified
as having Significant Market Power in a particular market. These
obligations are based on the outcomes that would occur under
general competition law.
“Must Carry” Requirements. In most countries
where we provide video and radio services, we are required to
transmit to subscribers certain “must carry” channels,
which generally include public national and local channels. In
some European countries, we may be obligated to transmit quite a
large number of channels by virtue of these requirements. Until
recently, there was no meaningful oversight of this issue at the
EU level. This changed when the Directives came into effect.
Member States are only permitted to impose must carry
obligations where they are necessary to meet clearly defined
general interest objectives and where they are proportionate and
transparent. Any such obligations must be subject to periodic
review. It is not clear what effect this new rule will have in
practice but we expect it to lead to a reduction of the size of
must-carry packages in some countries.
API Standards. The Directives require Member States to
encourage the use of open Application Programming Interfaces or
APIs. The European Commission is required to conduct a review to
ascertain whether interoperability and freedom of choice have
been adequately achieved in the Member States with respect to
digital interactive video services. If the European Commission
reaches a negative conclusion on this issue with respect to one
or more Member States, it has the power to mandate use of a
particular API.
Consumer Protection Issues and Pricing Restrictions.
Under the Directives, we may face various consumer protection
restrictions if we are in a dominant position in a particular
market. However, before the implementation of the Directives,
local or national regulatory authorities in many European
countries where we provide video services already imposed
pricing restrictions. This is often a contractual provision
rather than a regulatory requirement. Often, the relevant local
or national authority must approve basic tier price increases.
In certain countries, price increases will only be approved if
the increase is justified by an increase in costs associated
with providing the service or if the increase is less than or
equal to the increase in the consumer price index. Even in
countries where rates are not regulated, subscriber fees may be
challenged if they are deemed to constitute anti-competitive
practices.
Other. Our European operating companies must comply with
both specific and general legislation concerning data
protection, content provider liability and electronic commerce.
These issues are broadly harmonized at the EU level. This is an
area that may become more significant over time.
Broadcasting. Broadcasting is an area outside the scope
of the Directives. Generally, broadcasts originating in and
intended for reception within a country must respect the laws of
that country. However, pursuant to another Directive, EU Member
States are required to allow broadcast signals of broadcasters
in another EU Member State to be freely transmitted within their
territory so long as the broadcaster complies with the law of
the originating EU Member State. An international convention
extends this right beyond the EU’s borders into the
majority of territories in which we operate. An EU directive
also establishes quotas for the transmission of
European-produced programming and programs made by European
producers who are independent of broadcasters. The EU legal
framework governing broadcast television currently is under
review.
|
|
|
Competition Law and Other Matters |
EU directives and national consumer protection and competition
laws in our Western European and certain other markets impose
limitations on the pricing and marketing of bundled packages of
services, such as video, telephony and Internet access services.
Although our businesses may offer their services in bundled
packages
I-26
in European markets, they are generally not permitted to make
subscription to one service, such as cable television,
conditional upon subscription to another service, such as
telephony. In addition, providers cannot abuse or enhance a
dominant market position through unfair anti-competitive
behavior. For example, cross-subsidization having this effect
would be prohibited.
As our businesses become larger throughout the EU and in
individual countries in terms of service area coverage and
number of subscribers, they may face increased regulatory
scrutiny. Regulators may prevent certain acquisitions or permit
them only subject to certain conditions.
Austria has recently brought into effect a communications law
that broadly transposes the Directives. The NRA is in the
process of analyzing the 18 predefined markets to determine if
any operator or service provider has Significant Market Power.
We have been notified that the regulator’s intention is to
define us as having Significant Market Power in the call
termination market on our own telecommunications network,
together with all other network operators. It is unknown if and
which conditions the NRA will impose on the parties that have
been determined to have Significant Market Power.
France has recently brought into effect a communications law
that broadly transposes the Directives. The NRA is in the
process of analyzing the 18 predefined markets to determine if
any operator or service provider has Significant Market Power.
The Netherlands has recently brought into effect a
communications law that broadly transposes the Directives. The
NRA is currently analyzing the 18 predefined markets to
determine if any operator or service provider has Significant
Market Power, which could lead to obligations being placed on
us, especially with respect to television distribution (where we
faced obligations under the old regime). In the last quarter of
2004, the incumbent telecommunications operator, KPN, requested
access to our network to distribute television programming. The
NRA has denied the request of KPN, stating that we have no
obligation to lease capacity on our network to KPN. There have
been long-standing debates in The Netherlands regarding the
desirability of requiring cable operators to open their networks
to unaffiliated Internet service providers. To date these
discussions have not led to a requirement for cable operators to
offer such an access service.
The Dutch competition authority, NMA, is still investigating the
price increases that we made with respect to our video services
in 2004 to determine whether we abused our dominant position. If
the NMA were to find that the price increases amount to an abuse
of a dominant position, the NMA could impose fines of up to 10%
of our 2003 video revenue in The Netherlands and we would be
obliged to reconsider the price increases. Historically, in many
parts of the Netherlands, we are a party to contracts with local
municipalities that seek to control aspects of our Dutch
business including, in some cases, pricing and package
composition. Most of these contracts have been eliminated by
agreement, although some contracts are still in force and under
negotiation. In some cases there is litigation ongoing where
some municipalities have resisted our attempts to move away from
the contracts.
Regulation of the Cable Television Industry. The two key
laws governing cable television broadcasting services in Japan
are the Cable Television Broadcast Law and the Wire
Telecommunications Law. The Cable Television Broadcast Law was
enacted in 1972 to regulate the installation and operation of
cable television facilities and the provision of cable
television services. The Wire Telecommunications Law is the
basic law in Japan governing wire telecommunications, and it
regulates all wire telecommunications equipment, including cable
television facilities.
I-27
Under the Cable Television Broadcast Law, any business seeking
to install cable television facilities with more than 500 drop
terminals must obtain a license from the Ministry of Internal
Affairs and Communications, commonly referred to as the MIC.
Under the Wire Telecommunications Law, if these facilities have
fewer than 500 drop terminals, only prior notification to the
MIC is required. If a license is required, the license
application must provide an installation plan, including details
of the facilities to be constructed and the frequencies to be
used, financial estimates, and other relevant information.
Generally, the license holder must obtain prior permission from
the MIC in order to change any of the items included in the
original license application. The Cable Television Broadcast Law
also provides that any business that wishes to furnish cable
television services must file prior notification with the MIC
before commencing service. This notification must identify the
service areas, facilities and frequencies to be used (unless the
facilities are owned by the provider) and outline the proposed
cable television broadcasting services and other relevant
information, regardless of whether these facilities are leased
or owned. Generally, the cable television provider must notify
the MIC of any changes to these items.
Prior to the commencement of operations, a cable television
provider must notify the MIC of all charges and tariffs for its
cable television services. Those charges and tariffs to be
incurred in connection with the mandatory re-broadcasting of
television content require the approval of the MIC. A cable
television provider must also give prior notification to the MIC
of all amendments to existing tariffs or charges (but MIC
approval of these amendments is not required).
A cable television provider must comply with specific
guidelines, including: (1) editing standards;
(2) making its facilities available for third party use for
cable television broadcasting services, subject to the
availability of broadcast capacity; (3) providing service
within its service area to those who request it absent
reasonable grounds for refusal; (4) obtaining
retransmission consent where retransmission of television
broadcasts occur, unless such retransmission is required under
the Cable Television Broadcast Law for areas having difficulties
receiving television signals; and (5) obtaining permission
to use public roads for the installation and use of cable.
The MIC may revoke a facility license if the license holder
breaches the terms of its license; fails to comply with
technical standards set forth in, or otherwise fails to meet the
requirements of, the Cable Television Broadcast Law; or fails to
implement a MIC improvement order relating to its cable
television facilities or its operation of cable television
services.
Regulation of the Telecommunications Industry. As
providers of high-speed Internet access and telephony, our
businesses in Japan also are subject to regulation by the MIC
under the Telecommunications Business Law. The
Telecommunications Business Law previously regulated Type I and
Type II carriers. Type I carriers were allowed to carry data
over telecommunications circuit facilities which they install or
on which they hold long-term leases meeting certain criteria.
Type I carriers included common carriers, as well as wireless
operators. Type II carriers, including telecommunications
circuit resale carriers and Internet service providers, carried
data over facilities installed by others. Under the
Telecommunications Business Law, Type I carriers were allowed to
offer the same kinds and categories of services as Type II
carriers. Because our businesses carry data over
telecommunications circuit facilities they installed in
connection with their telephony and high-speed Internet access
and existing cable lines, our businesses were Type I carriers.
Effective April 1, 2004, amendments to the
Telecommunications Business Law eliminated the distinction
between Type I (facilities-based) and Type II (service-based)
carriers. Type I carriers previously were subject to more
stringent licensing and tariff requirements than Type II
carriers. The amendments will make it easier for entities to
enter the Japanese telecommunications market, particularly those
carriers who wish to own and operate their own facilities on a
limited scale. Larger carriers with facilities exceeding a
certain size will be required to register with the MIC, while
smaller carriers may enter the market just by providing notice
to the MIC. The amendments also allow any carrier to discontinue
business by providing notice to their users and ex post
notification to the MIC.
Under these amendments, carriers who provide Basic
Telecommunications Services, defined as telecommunications that
are indispensable to the lives of the citizenry as specified in
MIC ordinances, will be required to provide such services in an
appropriate, fair and stable manner. Carriers providing Basic
Telecommunications
I-28
Services must do so pursuant to terms and conditions and for
rates that have been filed in advance with the MIC. The MIC may
order modifications to contract terms and conditions it deems
inappropriate for certain specified reasons. The terms and
conditions as well as charges and tariffs for the provision of
telecommunications services for Type I carriers were strictly
regulated, but under these amendments, carriers may generally
negotiate terms and conditions with their users (including fees
and charges) except those relating to Basic Telecommunications
Services.
Under these amendments, interconnection with telecommunications
carriers was also deregulated. Telecommunications carriers,
other than those exceeding certain standards specified in the
Telecommunications Business Law (such as NTT), may set
interconnection tariffs and terms and conditions through
independent negotiations without MIC approval.
Telecommunication carriers that own their telecommunication
circuit facilities are required to maintain such facilities in
conformity with specified technical standards. The MIC may order
a carrier that fails to meet such standards to improve or repair
its telecommunication facilities.
Cable and telephony applications for permits and concessions are
submitted to the Ministry of Transportation and
Telecommunications, which, through the Subsecretary of
Telecommunications or Subtel, is responsible for regulating,
granting permits and concessions, registering and supervising
all telecommunications providers. The Antitrust Court
(Tribunal de Defensa de la Libre Competencia) also plays
an important role in regulating telecommunications in Chile
through its judgments. Wireline cable television permits are
non-exclusive and granted for indefinite terms. Wireless
television permits have renewable terms of 10 years, while
telecommunication concessions (for example, for fixed or mobile
telephony) have renewable 30-year terms. Wireline and wireless
permits and concessions require operation in accordance with a
technical plan submitted by the licensee together with the
permit or concession application. Our businesses have cable
permits in most major and medium sized markets in Chile. Cross
ownership between cable television, Internet access and
telephony is also permitted.
In general, the General Telecommunications Law of Chile allows
telecommunications companies to provide service and develop
telecommunication infrastructure without geographic restrictions
or exclusive rights to serve. Chile currently has a competitive,
multi-carrier system for international and local long distance
telecommunications services. Regulatory authorities currently
determine prices charged to customers for local
telecommunications services provided by incumbent local fixed
telephony operators until the market is determined to be
competitive. Charges for access (prices for terminating calls in
fixed or mobile networks), other interconnection services and
unbundling services are determined for all operators, whether or
not incumbent. To date, the regulatory authorities have
determined prices charged to customers by the dominant local
wireline telephony providers and the interconnection tariffs for
several other operators. In all cases, the authorities determine
a maximum rate structure that shall be in force for a five year
period. Local service providers with concessions are obligated
to provide service to all customers that are within their
service area or are willing to pay for an extension to receive
service. Local providers, whether or not incumbent, must also
give long distance service providers equal access to their
network connections at regulated prices.
U.S. Federal Communications Commission Regulation. The
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the regulations of
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) significantly
affect the cable system operations of our subsidiary Liberty
Cablevision of Puerto Rico, including, for example, subscriber
rates; carriage of broadcast television stations; leased access
and public, educational and government access; customer service;
program packaging to subscribers; obscene programming; technical
operating standards; use of utility poles and conduit; and
ownership transfers. Thus, the FCC limits the price that cable
systems that are not subject to effective competition may charge
for basic services and equipment. Cable systems also must carry,
without compensation, certain commercial and non-commercial
television station programming within
I-29
their geographic markets. Alternatively, local television
stations may insist that a cable operator negotiate for
retransmission consent. In addition, the FCC initiated a further
notice of proposed rulemaking to determine whether a television
station may assert rights to carriage on cable systems of both
analog and digital signals during the transition to digital
television and to carriage of all digital signals transmitted by
a station. On February 10, 2005, the FCC denied mandatory
dual carriage of a television station’s analog and digital
signals during the digital television transition and mandatory
carriage of all digital signals, other than its
“primary” signal.
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico also offers high-speed
Internet access over portions of its network. The FCC has
classified high-speed Internet access service as an
“interstate information service” which the FCC
traditionally has not regulated. However, a federal appellate
court vacated the FCC’s classification, and rehearing was
denied. On December 3, 2004, the United States Supreme
Court decided to review the federal appellate court’s
decision. Thus, it is uncertain how Internet access services
ultimately will be classified and regulated. The FCC also
adopted a notice of proposed rulemaking to examine whether local
franchising authorities should be allowed to impose regulatory
requirements on high-speed Internet access, among other issues.
Puerto Rico Regulation. The Puerto Rico
Telecommunications Regulatory Board awards franchises for and
regulates cable television systems in Puerto Rico. Such
franchises are non-exclusive and renewable for periods up to
10 years. The regulatory board may revoke a franchise for
various reasons, including, for example, substantial
noncompliance with franchise terms and conditions, violations of
applicable regulations, or continuing failure to satisfy
required customer service standards. Cable systems may be
charged a franchise fee of up to 5% of their gross revenue.
The Comité Federal de Radiodifusión exercises broad
regulatory authority over broadcast television, cable system and
DTH satellite licensees. Our businesses provide programming to
such distributors. Programming must comply with restrictions on
obscene, violent and advertising content, among other matters.
Licensed distributors are responsible for complying with these
restrictions.
Competition
Markets for broadband distribution, including cable and
satellite distribution, Internet access and telephony services,
and video programming generally are highly competitive and
rapidly evolving. Consequently, our businesses expect to face
increased competition in these markets in the countries in which
they operate, and specifically as a result of deregulation in
the EU.
Our businesses compete directly with a wide range of providers
of news, information and entertainment programming to consumers.
Depending upon the country and market, these may include:
(1) over-the-air broadcast television services;
(2) DTH satellite service providers (systems that transmit
satellite signals containing video programming, data and other
information to receiving dishes of varying sizes located on the
subscriber’s premises); (3) satellite master antenna
television systems, commonly known as SMATVs, which generally
serve condominiums, apartment and office complexes and
residential developments; (4) MMDS operators;
(5) digital television terrestrial broadcasters;
(6) other cable operators in the same communities that we
serve; (7) other fixed-line telecommunications carriers and
broadband providers, including the incumbent telecommunications
operators, offering video products using DSL or ADSL technology
or over fiber optic lines of fiber-to-the-home, or
“FTTH,” networks; and (8) movie theaters, video
stores and home video products. Our businesses also compete to
varying degrees with more traditional sources of information and
entertainment, such as newspapers, magazines, books, live
entertainment/concerts and sporting events.
I-30
In some countries, our businesses face significant competition
from other cable operators, while in other countries the primary
competition is from DTH satellite service providers, digital
television terrestrial broadcasters and/or other distributors of
video programming using broadband networks. In some of our
largest markets, including The Netherlands, France and Japan, we
are facing increasing competition from video services offered by
or over the network of the incumbent telecommunications
operator. In Austria, the primary competition for video services
is from satellite television service providers.
With respect to Internet access services and online content, our
businesses face competition in a rapidly evolving marketplace
from incumbent and non-incumbent telecommunications companies,
other cable-based Internet service providers, non-cable-based
Internet service providers and Internet portals, many of which
have substantial resources. The Internet services offered by
these competitors include both traditional dial-up Internet
services and high-speed Internet access services using DSL or
ADSL technology or fiber optic lines, in a range of product
offerings with varying speeds and pricing, as well as
interactive computer-based services, data and other non-video
services to homes and businesses.
With respect to telephony services, our businesses face
competition from the incumbent telecommunications operator in
each country. These operators have substantially more experience
in providing telephony services, greater resources to devote to
the provision of telephony services and longstanding customer
relationships. In many countries, our businesses also face
competition from other cable telephony providers, wireless
telephony providers, FTTH-based providers or other indirect
access providers. Competition in both the residential and
business telephony markets will increase with certain market
trends and regulatory changes, such as general price
competition, the introduction of carrier pre-selection, number
portability, continued deregulation of telephony markets, the
replacement of fixed-line with mobile telephony, and the growth
of VoIP services.
The business of providing programming for cable and satellite
television distribution is highly competitive. Our programming
businesses directly compete with other programmers for
distribution on a limited number of channels. Once distribution
is obtained, these programming services compete, to varying
degrees, for viewers and advertisers with other cable and over
the air broadcast television programming services as well as
with other entertainment media, including home video (generally
video rentals), online activities, movies and other forms of
news, information and entertainment.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, our consolidated subsidiaries and
we had an aggregate of approximately 11,800 employees. We
believe that our employee relations are good.
|
|
|
(d) Financial Information About Geographic
Areas |
Financial information related to the geographic areas in which
we do business appears in note 20 to our consolidated
financial statements included in Part II of this report.
|
|
|
(e) Available Information |
All our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
well as amendments to such filings are available on our Internet
website free of charge generally within 24 hours after we file
such material with the SEC. Our website address is
www.libertymediainternational.com. The information on our
website is not incorporated by reference herein.
* * * * *
I-31
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, you should carefully consider the
following risk factors in evaluating us and our businesses.
Factors Relating to Overseas Operations and Regulations
Our businesses are conducted almost exclusively outside of
the United States, which gives rise to numerous operational
risks. Our businesses are operated almost exclusively in
countries other than the United States and are thereby subject
to the following inherent risks:
|
|
|
| |
• |
longer payment cycles by customers in foreign countries that may
increase the uncertainty associated with recoverable accounts; |
| |
| |
• |
difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; |
| |
| |
• |
economic instability; |
| |
| |
• |
potentially adverse tax consequences; |
| |
| |
• |
export and import restrictions, tariffs and other trade barriers; |
| |
| |
• |
increases in taxes and governmental royalties and fees; |
| |
| |
• |
involuntary renegotiation of contracts with foreign governments; |
| |
| |
• |
changes in foreign and domestic laws and policies that govern
operations of foreign-based companies; and |
| |
| |
• |
disruptions of services or loss of property or equipment that
are critical to overseas businesses due to expropriation,
nationalization, war, insurrection, terrorism or general social
or political unrest. |
We are exposed to potentially volatile fluctuations of the
U.S. dollar (our functional currency) against the currencies of
our operating subsidiaries and affiliates. Any increase
(decrease) in the value of the U.S. dollar against any
foreign currency that is the functional currency of an operating
subsidiary or affiliate of ours will cause us to experience
unrealized foreign currency translation losses (gains) with
respect to amounts already invested in such foreign currencies.
In addition, we and our operating subsidiaries and affiliates
are exposed to foreign currency risk to the extent that we or
they enter into transactions denominated in currencies other
than our respective functional currencies, such as investments
in debt and equity securities of foreign subsidiaries, equipment
purchases, programming costs, notes payable and notes receivable
(including intercompany amounts) that are denominated in a
currency other than our or their own functional currency.
Changes in exchange rates with respect to these items will
result in unrealized (based upon period-end exchange rates) or
realized foreign currency transaction gains and losses upon
settlement of the transactions. In addition, we are exposed to
foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to operating
subsidiaries’ monetary assets and liabilities and the
financial results of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates when
their respective financial statements are translated into U.S.
dollars for inclusion in our consolidated financial statements.
Cumulative translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component
of equity. As a result of foreign currency risk, we may
experience economic loss and a negative impact on earnings and
equity with respect to our holdings solely as a result of
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Our primary
exposure to foreign currency risk is the euro as over 50% of our
U.S. dollar revenue is derived from countries where the euro is
the functional currency. In addition, our operating results are
significantly impacted by changes in the exchange rates for the
Japanese yen, Chilean peso and, to a lesser degree, other local
currencies in Europe. In the past, we generally have not entered
into derivative transactions that are designed to reduce our
long-term exposure to foreign currency exchange risk.
Our businesses are subject to risks of adverse regulation
by foreign governments. Our businesses are subject to
the unique regulatory regimes of the countries in which they
operate. Cable and telecommunications businesses are subject to
licensing eligibility rules and regulations, which vary by
country. The provision of telephony services requires licensing
from, or registration with, the appropriate regulatory
authorities and
I-32
entrance into interconnection arrangements with the incumbent
phone companies. It is possible that countries in which we
operate may adopt laws and regulations regarding electronic
commerce which could dampen the growth of the Internet access
services being offered and developed by these businesses.
Programming businesses are subject to regulation on a country by
country basis, including programming content requirements,
requirements to carry specified programming, service quality
standards, price controls and ownership restrictions.
Consequently, such businesses must adapt their ownership and
organizational structure as well as their services to satisfy
the rules and regulations to which they are subject. A failure
to comply with these rules and regulations could result in
penalties, restrictions on such business or loss of required
licenses.
Businesses that offer multiple services, such as video
distribution as well as Internet access and telephony, or both
video distribution and programming content, are facing increased
regulatory review from competition authorities in several
countries in which we operate. For example, the European Union
and the regulatory authorities in several countries in which we
do business are considering what access rights, if any, should
be afforded to third parties for use of existing cable
television networks. If third parties were to be granted access
to the distribution infrastructure of our subsidiaries or
affiliates for the delivery of video, audio, Internet or other
services, those providers could compete with services similar to
those our businesses offer, which could lead to significant
price competition and loss of market share.
We may determine to acquire additional communications companies.
These acquisitions may require the approval of governmental
authorities, which can block, impose conditions on or delay an
acquisition.
We cannot be certain that we will be successful in
acquiring new businesses or integrating acquired businesses with
our existing operations. Historically, our businesses
have grown, in part, through selective acquisitions that enabled
them to take advantage of existing networks, local service
offerings and region-specific management expertise. We may seek
to continue growing our businesses through acquisitions in
selected markets. Our ability to acquire new businesses may be
limited by many factors, including debt covenants, availability
of financing, the prevalence of complex ownership structures
among potential targets and government regulation. Even if we
are successful in acquiring new businesses, the integration of
new businesses may present significant challenges, including:
realizing economies of scale in interconnection, programming and
network operations; eliminating duplicative overheads; and
integrating networks, financial systems and operational systems.
We cannot assure you that we will be successful in acquiring new
businesses or realizing the anticipated benefits of any
completed acquisition.
In addition, we anticipate that most, if not all, companies we
acquire will be located outside the United States. Foreign
companies may not have disclosure controls and procedures or
internal controls over financial reporting that are as thorough
or effective as those required by U.S. securities laws. While we
intend to implement appropriate controls and procedures as we
integrate acquired companies, we may not be able to certify as
to the effectiveness of these companies’ disclosure
controls and procedures or internal controls over financial
reporting until we have fully integrated them.
We will be subject to the risk of revocation or loss of
our telecommunications and media licenses. In certain
operating regions, the services provided by our businesses
require receipt of a license from the appropriate national,
provincial and/or local regulatory authority. In those regions,
regulatory authorities may have significant discretion in
granting licenses, including the term of the licenses, and are
often under no obligation to renew them when they expire. The
breach of a license or applicable law, even if inadvertent, can
result in the revocation, suspension, cancellation or reduction
in the term of a license or the imposition of fines. In
addition, regulatory authorities may grant new licenses to third
parties, resulting in greater competition in territories where
our businesses may already be licensed. In order to promote
competition, licenses may also require that third parties be
granted access to the bandwidth, frequency capacity, facilities
or services of our businesses. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to obtain or retain any required license, or that
any renewal of a required license will not be on less favorable
terms.
We may have to pay U.S. taxes on earnings of certain of
our foreign subsidiaries regardless of whether such earnings are
actually distributed to us, and we may be limited in claiming
foreign tax credits; since substantially all of our revenue is
generated through our foreign investments, these tax risks could
have a material adverse impact on our effective income tax rate,
financial condition and liquidity. Certain foreign
I-33
corporations in which we have interests particularly those in
which we have controlling interests, are considered to be
“controlled foreign corporations” under U.S. tax law.
In general, our pro rata share of certain income earned by our
subsidiaries that are controlled foreign corporations during a
taxable year when such subsidiaries have current or accumulated
earnings and profits will be included in our income when the
income is earned, regardless of whether the income is
distributed to us. This income, typically referred to as
“Subpart F income,” generally includes, but is not
limited to, such items as interest, dividends, royalties, gains
from the disposition of certain property, certain currency
exchange gains in excess of currency exchange losses, and
certain related party sales and services income. In addition, a
U.S. stockholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be
required to include in income its pro rata share of the
controlled foreign corporation’s increase for the year in
current or accumulated earnings and profits (other than Subpart
F income) invested in U.S. property, regardless of whether the
U.S. stockholder received any actual cash distributions from the
controlled foreign corporation. Since we are investors in
foreign corporations, we could have significant amounts of
Subpart F income. Although we intend to take reasonable tax
planning measures to limit our tax exposure, we cannot assure
you that we will be able to do so.
In general, a U.S. corporation may claim a foreign tax credit
against its U.S. federal income taxes for foreign income taxes
paid or accrued. A U.S. corporation may also claim a credit for
foreign income taxes paid or accrued on the earnings of certain
foreign corporations paid to the U.S. corporation as a dividend.
Our ability to claim a foreign tax credit for dividends received
from our foreign subsidiaries is subject to various limitations.
Some of our businesses are located in countries with which the
United States does not have income tax treaties. Because we lack
treaty protection in these countries, we may be subject to high
rates of withholding taxes on distributions and other payments
from our businesses and may be subject to double taxation on our
income. Limitations on our ability to claim a foreign tax
credit, our lack of treaty protection in some countries, and our
inability to offset losses in one foreign jurisdiction against
income earned in another foreign jurisdiction could result in a
high effective U.S. federal income tax rate on our earnings.
Since substantially all of our revenue is generated abroad,
including in jurisdictions that do not have tax treaties with
the United States, these risks are proportionately greater for
us than for companies that generate most of their revenue in the
United States or in jurisdictions that have such treaties.
Factors Relating to Technology and Competition
Changes in technology may limit the competitiveness of and
demand for services, which may adversely impact our business and
stock value. Technology in the video, telecommunications
and data services industries is changing rapidly. This
significantly influences the demand for the products and
services that are offered by our businesses. The ability to
anticipate changes in technology and consumer tastes and to
develop and introduce new and enhanced products on a timely
basis will affect our ability to continue to grow, increase our
revenue and number of subscribers and remain competitive. New
products, once marketed, may not meet consumer expectations or
demand, can be subject to delays in development and may fail to
operate as intended. A lack of market acceptance of new products
and services which we may offer, or the development of
significant competitive products or services by others, could
have a material adverse impact on our revenue, growth and stock
price. Alternatively, if consumer demand for new services in a
specific country or region exceeds our expectations, meeting
that demand could overburden our infrastructure, which could
result in service interruptions and a loss of customers.
We operate in an increasingly competitive market, and
there is a risk that we will not be able to effectively compete
with other service providers. The markets for cable
television, high-speed Internet access and telecommunications in
many of the regions in which we operate are highly competitive
and highly fragmented. In the provision of video services, we
face competition from other cable television service providers,
direct-to-home satellite service providers, digital terrestrial
television broadcasters and video over asymmetric digital
subscriber line providers, among others. Our operating
businesses in The Netherlands, France and Japan are facing
increasing competition from video services provided by or over
the networks of incumbent telecommunications operators. In the
provision of telephony services, we face competition from the
incumbent telecommunications operators in each country in which
we operate. These operators have substantially more experience
in providing telephone services and have greater resources to
devote to the provision of telephone
I-34
services. In addition, in many countries, we face competition
from wireless telephone providers, facilities-based and resale
telephone operators, voice over Internet protocol providers and
other providers. In the provision of Internet access services
and online content, we face competition from incumbent
telecommunications companies and other telecommunications
operators, other cable-based Internet service providers,
non-cable based Internet service providers, Internet portals and
satellite, microwave and other wireless providers. The Internet
services offered by these competitors include both traditional
dial-up access services and high-speed access services. Digital
subscriber line is a technology that provides high-speed
Internet access over traditional telephone lines. Both incumbent
and alternative providers offer digital subscriber line
services. We expect digital subscriber line to be an
increasingly strong competitor in the provision of Internet
services.
The market for programming services is also highly competitive.
Programming businesses compete with other programmers for
distribution on a limited number of channels. Once distribution
is obtained, program offerings must then compete for viewers and
advertisers with other programming services as well as with
other entertainment media, such as home video, online activities
and movies.
We expect the level and intensity of competition to increase in
the future from both existing competitors and new market
entrants as a result of changes in the regulatory framework of
the industries in which we operate, the influx of new market
entrants and strategic alliances and cooperative relationships
among industry participants. Increased competition may result in
increased customer churn, reduce the rate of customer
acquisition and lead to significant price competition, in each
case resulting in decreases in cash flows, operating margins and
profitability. The inability to compete effectively may result
in the loss of subscribers, and our revenue and stock price may
suffer.
We may not be able to obtain attractive programming for
our digital video services, thereby lowering demand for our
services. We rely on programming suppliers for the bulk
of our programming content. We may not be able to obtain
sufficient high-quality programming for our digital video
services on satisfactory terms or at all in order to offer
compelling digital video services. This may reduce demand for
our services, thereby lowering our future revenue. It may also
limit our ability to migrate customers from lower tier
programming to higher tier programming, thereby inhibiting their
ability to execute their business plans. Furthermore, we may not
be able to obtain attractive country-specific programming for
video services. This could further lower revenue and
profitability. In addition, must-carry requirements may consume
channel capacity otherwise available for other services.
Some of our operating businesses depend upon third parties
for the distribution of their products and services. In
certain operating regions, our businesses require access to
utility poles, roadside conduits and leased fiber that
interconnect our headends and/or connect our headends to
telecommunications facilities of third parties. This
infrastructure is, in some cases, owned by regional utility
companies or other third party administrators, and access to the
infrastructure is licensed to our businesses. In other operating
regions, the transmission of cable programming content to
regional headend facilities is accomplished via communications
satellites owned by third parties, who, in some cases, are
competitors. We cannot assure you that our businesses will be
able to renew any existing access agreements with these third
parties or enter into new agreements for additional access
rights, which may be necessary for the expansion of our
businesses in these regions. Any cancellation, delay or
interruption in these access rights would disrupt the delivery
of our products and services to customers in the affected
regions. In addition, the failure to obtain additional access
rights from such third parties could preclude expansionary
efforts in these operating regions. We also cannot assure you
that any alternative distribution means will be available in
these regions, on reasonable terms or at all.
We may compete with Liberty for business opportunities.
Our former parent company, Liberty, has interests in
various U.S. programming companies that have subsidiaries or
controlled affiliates that own or operate foreign programming
services that may compete with the programming services to be
offered by our businesses. In addition, Liberty may seek to
expand its foreign programming services to capitalize on the
significant growth potential presented by the international
cable market. As a result of these expansionary efforts, our
programming services may find themselves in direct competition
with those of Liberty. We have no rights in respect of
international programming opportunities developed by or
presented to the subsidiaries or controlled affiliates of
Liberty’s U.S. programming companies and the pursuit of
these opportunities by such
I-35
subsidiaries or affiliates may adversely affect our interests.
Since we will have overlapping directors with Liberty, the
pursuit of these opportunities could create, or appear to
create, potential conflicts of interest.
Factors Relating to Certain Financial Matters
The liquidity and value of our interests in our
subsidiaries and affiliates may be adversely affected by
stockholder agreements and similar agreements to which we are a
party. We own equity interests in a variety of
international broadband distribution and video programming
businesses. Certain of these equity interests are held pursuant
to stockholder agreements, partnership agreements and other
instruments and agreements that contain provisions that affect
the liquidity, and therefore the realizable value, of those
interests. Most of these agreements subject the transfer of such
equity interests to consent rights or rights of first refusal of
the other stockholders or partners. In certain cases, a change
in control of the company or the subsidiary holding the equity
interest will give rise to rights or remedies exercisable by
other stockholders or partners. Some of our subsidiaries and
affiliates are parties to loan agreements that restrict changes
in ownership of the borrower without the consent of the lenders.
All of these provisions will restrict the ability to sell those
equity interests and may adversely affect the prices at which
those interests may be sold.
We do not have the right to manage the businesses or affairs of
any of the companies in which we hold less than a majority
voting interest. Rather, such rights may take the form of
representation on the board of directors or a partners’ or
similar committee that supervises management or possession of
veto rights over significant or extraordinary actions. The scope
of veto rights varies from agreement to agreement. Although
board representation and veto rights may enable us to exercise
influence over the management or policies of an affiliate, they
do not enable us to cause those affiliates to take actions, such
as paying dividends or making distributions to their
stockholders or partners.
We have a history of reporting operating and net losses.
Our net earnings (losses) amounted to
$(31.8 million), $20.9 million, and
$(568.2 million), for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively. In light of our historical
financial performance we cannot assure you that we will report
operating income or net earnings in the near future or at all.
If we fail to meet required capital calls to a company in
which we hold interests, our interests in that company could be
diluted or we could forfeit important rights. We are
parties to stockholder and partnership agreements that provide
for possible capital calls on stockholders and partners. Failure
to meet a capital call, or other commitment to provide capital
or loans to a particular company in which we holds interests may
have adverse consequences to us. These consequences may include,
among others, the dilution of our equity interest in that
company, the forfeiture of the right to vote or exercise other
rights or, in some instances, a breach of contract action for
damages. The ability to meet capital calls or other capital or
loan commitments is subject to the ability to access cash.
We may not freely access the cash of our operating
companies. Our operations are conducted through our
respective subsidiaries. Our potential sources of cash will
include our available cash balances, net cash from the operating
activities of our subsidiaries, dividends and interest from our
investments, availability under credit facilities and proceeds
from asset sales. The ability of our operating subsidiaries to
pay dividends or to make other payments or advances to us
depends on their individual operating results and any statutory,
regulatory or contractual restrictions to which they may be or
may become subject. Some of our operating subsidiaries are
subject to loan agreements or bank facilities that restrict
sales of assets and prohibit or limit the payment of dividends
or the making of distributions, loans or advances to
stockholders and partners. In addition, because these
subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities they have
no obligation to provide us with funds for payment obligations,
whether by dividends, distributions, loans or other payments.
With respect to those companies in which we have less than a
majority voting interest, we do not have sufficient voting
control to cause those companies to pay dividends or make other
payments or advances to any of their partners or stockholders,
including us.
If we are unable to satisfy completely the regulatory
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, or our internal control over financial reporting is not
effective, the reliability of our financial statements may be
questioned and our stock price may suffer.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
requires
I-36
companies to do a comprehensive evaluation of their internal
control over financial reporting. To comply with this statute,
we will be required to document and test our internal control
procedures; our management will be required to assess and issue
a report concerning our internal control over financial
reporting; and our independent auditors will be required to
issue an opinion on management’s assessment of those
matters. Our compliance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act will first be tested in connection with the
filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2005. The rules governing the
standards that must be met for management to assess our internal
control over financial reporting are new and complex and require
significant documentation, testing and possible remediation to
meet the detailed standards under the rules. During the course
of our testing, our management may identify material weaknesses
or deficiencies which may not be remedied in time to meet the
deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. If management cannot
favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting or our auditors identify material weaknesses
in those controls, investor confidence in our financial results
may weaken, and our stock price may suffer.
Certain of our subsidiaries are subject to various debt
instruments that contain restrictions on how they finance their
operations and operate their businesses, which could impede
their ability to engage in beneficial transactions.
Certain or our subsidiaries are subject to significant
financial and operating restrictions contained in outstanding
credit agreements, indentures and similar instruments of
indebtedness. These restrictions will affect, and in some cases
significantly limit or prohibit, among other things, the ability
of those subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
| |
• |
borrow more funds; |
| |
| |
• |
pay dividends or make other upstream distributions; |
| |
| |
• |
make investments; |
| |
| |
• |
engage in transactions with us or other affiliates; or |
| |
| |
• |
create liens on their assets. |
As a result of restrictions contained in these credit
facilities, the companies party thereto, and their subsidiaries,
could be unable to obtain additional capital in the future to:
|
|
|
| |
• |
fund capital expenditures or acquisitions that could improve
their value; |
| |
| |
• |
meet their loan and capital commitments to their business
affiliates; |
| |
| |
• |
invest in companies in which they would otherwise invest; |
| |
| |
• |
fund any operating losses or future development of their
business affiliates; |
| |
| |
• |
obtain lower borrowing costs that are available from secured
lenders or engage in advantageous transactions that monetize
their assets; or |
| |
| |
• |
conduct other necessary or prudent corporate activities. |
We are typically prohibited from or significantly restricted in
accessing the net cash of our subsidiaries that have outstanding
credit facilities.
In addition, some of the credit agreements to which these
subsidiaries are parties require them to maintain financial
ratios, including ratios of total debt to operating cash flow
and operating cash flow to interest expense. Their ability to
meet these financial ratios and tests may be affected by events
beyond their control, and we cannot assure you that they will be
met. In the event of a default under such subsidiaries’
credit agreements or indentures, the lenders may accelerate the
maturity of the indebtedness under those agreements or
indentures, which could result in a default under other
outstanding credit facilities of these subsidiaries. We cannot
assure you that any of these subsidiaries will have sufficient
assets to pay indebtedness outstanding under their credit
agreements and indentures. Any refinancing of this indebtedness
is likely to contain similar restrictive covenants.
I-37
Factors Relating to Governance Matters
It may be difficult for a third party to acquire us, even
if doing so may be beneficial to our stockholders.
Certain provisions of our restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a
change in control of us that a stockholder may consider
favorable. These provisions include the following:
|
|
|
| |
• |
authorizing a capital structure with multiple series of common
stock: a Series B that entitles the holders to ten votes
per share; a Series A that entitles the holders to one vote
per share; and a Series C that, except as otherwise
required by applicable law, entitles the holder to no voting
rights; |
| |
| |
• |
authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred
stock, which could be issued by our board of directors to
increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover
attempt; |
| |
| |
• |
classifying our board of directors with staggered three-year
terms, which may lengthen the time required to gain control of
our board of directors; |
| |
| |
• |
limiting who may call special meetings of stockholders; |
| |
| |
• |
prohibiting stockholder action by written consent, thereby
requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of
the stockholders; |
| |
| |
• |
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations of
candidates for election to our board of directors or for
proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at
stockholder meetings; |
| |
| |
• |
requiring stockholder approval by holders of at least 80% of our
voting power or the approval by at least 75% of our board of
directors with respect to certain extraordinary matters, such as
a merger or consolidation with us, a sale of all or
substantially all of our assets or an amendment to our restated
certificate of incorporation or bylaws; and |
| |
| |
• |
the existence of authorized and unissued stock which would allow
our board of directors to issue shares to persons friendly to
current management, thereby protecting the continuity of our
management, or which could be used to dilute the stock ownership
of persons seeking to obtain control of us. |
Our incentive plan may also discourage, delay or prevent a
change in control of us even if such change of control would be
in the best interests of our stockholders.
Holders of any single series of our common stock may not
have any remedies if any action by our directors or officers has
an adverse effect on only that series of our common stock.
Principles of Delaware law and the provisions of our
restated certificate of incorporation may protect decisions of
our board of directors that have a disparate impact upon holders
of any single series of our common stock. Under Delaware law,
our board of directors has a duty to act with due care and in
the best interests of all our stockholders, including the
holders of all series of our common stock. Principles of
Delaware law established in cases involving differing treatment
of multiple classes or series of stock provide that a board of
directors owes an equal duty to all common stockholders
regardless of class or series and does not have separate or
additional duties to any group of stockholders. As a result, in
some circumstances, our directors may be required to make a
decision that is adverse to the holders of one series of our
common stock. Under the principles of Delaware law referred to
above, you may not be able to challenge these decisions if our
board of directors is disinterested and adequately informed with
respect to these decisions and acts in good faith and in the
honest belief that it is acting in the best interests of all of
our stockholders.
Item 2. PROPERTIES
We lease our executive offices in Englewood, Colorado from
Liberty. All of our other real or personal property is owned or
leased by our subsidiaries and affiliates.
UGC leases its executive offices in Denver, Colorado. UGC’s
various operating companies lease or own their respective
administrative offices, headend facilities, rights of way and
other property necessary for their operations. The physical
components of their broadband networks require maintenance and
periodic upgrades to support the new services and products they
introduce.
I-38
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico owns its main office in
Luquillo, Puerto Rico, its headends and certain other equipment
in Cayey, Humacao and Lares, Puerto Rico. Liberty Cablevision of
Puerto Rico also leases additional customer service offices,
warehouses, headends and other equipment throughout Puerto Rico.
Pramer leases its offices in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Our other subsidiaries and affiliates own or lease the fixed
assets necessary for the operation of their respective
businesses, including office space, transponder space, headends,
cable television and telecommunications distribution equipment,
telecommunications switches and customer equipment (including
converter boxes). Our management believes that our current
facilities are suitable and adequate for our business operations
for the foreseeable future.
Item 3. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, our subsidiaries and affiliates have become
involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of their
operations in the normal course of business. The following is a
description of certain legal proceedings to which one of our
subsidiaries or another company in which we hold an interest is
a party. In our opinion, the ultimate resolution of these legal
proceedings would not likely have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations, financial condition or
liquidity.
Old UGC Reorganization. On January 12, 2004, Old
UGC, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UGC, filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York. On September 21, 2004, UGC and Old UGC filed with
the Bankruptcy Court a plan of reorganization, which was
subsequently amended on October 5, 2004. On
November 10, 2004, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the
amended plan of reorganization.
On November 24, 2004, Old UGC completed the restructuring
of its indebtedness and other obligations pursuant to the terms
of the approved plan of reorganization. In the restructuring,
Old UGC acquired (i) $638.0 million face amount of Old
UGC senior notes held by UGC in consideration for newly issued
common stock of Old UGC and (ii) $599.2 million face
amount of Old UGC senior notes held by IDT United, Inc. in
consideration for newly issued preferred stock of Old UGC. At
the time, UGC owned a 33% common equity interest and a 94% fully
diluted interest in IDT United. The Old UGC senior notes held by
third parties ($24.6 million face amount) were left
outstanding (after cure, through the repayment of approximately
$5.1 million in unpaid interest, and reinstatement) and
were subsequently redeemed in February 2005. In addition, Old
UGC paid approximately $3.1 million in settlement of
certain outstanding guarantee obligations.
Following the restructuring, UGC acquired the interests in
IDT United that it did not previously own for a total cash
purchase price of approximately $22.7 million. As a result
of Old UGC’s restructuring and UGC’s purchase of the
IDT United interests, UGC continues to hold 100% of Old
UGC’s outstanding equity securities.
Movieco. On December 3, 2002, Europe Movieco
Partners Limited (Movieco) filed a request for arbitration
against United Pan-Europe Communications, N.V., a
subsidiary of UGC that we refer to as UPC, with the
International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber
of Commerce. The request contained claims that were based on a
cable affiliation agreement entered into between the parties on
December 21, 1999. In the proceedings, Movieco claimed
(1) unpaid license fees due under the affiliation
agreement, plus interest, (2) an order for specific
performance of the affiliation agreement or, in the alternative,
damages for breach of that agreement, and (3) legal and
arbitration costs plus interest. On January 13, 2005, the
Arbitral Tribunal rendered an award in which Movieco’s
claim for the unpaid license fees as described above was
sustained and determined that UPC must pay unpaid license fees,
plus interest and legal fees. These amounts, which aggregated
$49.3 million, were paid during the first quarter of 2005.
All other claims and counterclaims were dismissed.
Excite@Home. In 2000, certain of UGC’s subsidiaries,
including UPC, pursued a transaction with Excite@Home which, if
completed, would have merged UPC’s chello broadband
subsidiary with Excite@Home’s international broadband
operations to form a European Internet business. The transaction
I-39
was not completed, and discussions between the parties ended in
late 2000. On November 3, 2003, UGC received a complaint
filed on September 26, 2003 by Frank Morrow, on behalf of
the General Unsecured Creditors’ Liquidating Trust of At
Home in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of California, styled as In re At Home Corporation,
Frank Morrow v. UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. et al. (Case
No. 01-32495-TC). In general, the complaint alleged breach
of contract and fiduciary duty by UGC and Old UGC, Inc. The
plaintiff filed a claim in the Old UGC bankruptcy proceedings of
approximately $2.2 billion. On September 16, 2004, the
Bankruptcy Court in the Old UGC bankruptcy proceedings estimated
the claim against Old UGC at zero. On November 10,
2004, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed Old UGC’s plan of
reorganization, which provided that the claim of Excite@Home
would receive no distribution and released both Old UGC and UGC
from any liability in connection with such claim. The
reorganization became effective on November 24, 2004. On
February 15, 2005, the parties involved in the California
proceeding agreed to dismiss the Excite@Home complaint.
Cignal. On April 26, 2002, UPC received a notice
that certain former shareholders of Cignal Global Communications
filed a lawsuit against UPC in the District Court in Amsterdam,
The Netherlands, claiming $200 million on the basis that
UPC failed to honor certain option rights that were granted to
those shareholders in connection with the acquisition of Cignal
by Priority Telecom. UPC believes that it has complied in full
with its obligations to these shareholders through the
successful completion of the initial public offering of Priority
Telecom on September 27, 2001. Accordingly, UPC believes
that the Cignal shareholders’ claims are without merit and
intends to defend this suit vigorously. In December 2003,
certain members and former members of the Supervisory Board of
Priority Telecom were put on notice that a tort claim may be
filed against them for their cooperation in the initial public
offering. A hearing was held on March 8, 2005 and a
decision is expected in April 2005.
Class Action Lawsuits Relating to the Merger Transaction
with UGC. Since January 18, 2005, twenty-one lawsuits
have been filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, and one
lawsuit has been filed in the Denver District Court, State of
Colorado, all purportedly on behalf of the public stockholders
of UGC regarding the announcement on January 18, 2005 of
the execution by UGC and us of the agreement and plan of merger
for the combination of our companies under a new parent company.
The defendants named in these actions include UGC, Gene W.
Schneider, Michael T. Fries, David B. Koff,
Robert R. Bennett, John C. Malone, John P. Cole,
Bernard G. Dvorak, John W. Dick, Paul A. Gould
and Gary S. Howard (directors of UGC) and us. The
allegations in each of the complaints, which are substantially
similar, assert that the defendants have breached their
fiduciary duties of loyalty, care, good faith and candor and
that various defendants have engaged in self-dealing and unjust
enrichment, affirmed an unfair price, and impeded or discouraged
other offers for UGC or its assets in bad faith and for improper
motives. In addition to seeking to enjoin the transaction, the
complaints seek remedies including damages for the public
holders of UGC stock and an award of attorney’s fees to
plaintiffs’ counsel. On February 11, 2005, the
Delaware Court of Chancery consolidated the Delaware lawsuits.
In connection with the Delaware lawsuits, defendants have been
served with one request for production of documents. The
defendants believe the lawsuits are without merit.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF
MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
I-40
PART II
|
|
| Item 5. |
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES. |
We have two series of common stock, LMI Series A and LMI
Series B, which trade on the Nasdaq National Market under
the symbols “LBTYA” and “LBTYB,”
respectively. Regular trading on our common stock began on
June 8, 2004. The following table sets forth the range of
high and low sales prices of shares of LMI Series A and LMI
Series B common stock for 2004.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Series A | |
|
Series B | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Second quarter
|
|
$ |
38.00 |
|
|
|
33.98 |
|
|
|
41.25 |
|
|
|
38.79 |
|
| |
Third quarter
|
|
$ |
37.00 |
|
|
|
28.60 |
|
|
|
41.25 |
|
|
|
34.05 |
|
| |
Fourth quarter
|
|
$ |
47.27 |
|
|
|
33.25 |
|
|
|
49.31 |
|
|
|
36.19 |
|
As of February 14, 2005, there were approximately 3,756 and
240 record holders of LMI Series A and LMI Series B
common stock, respectively (which amounts do not include the
number of shareholders whose shares are held of record by banks,
brokerage houses or other institutions, but include each such
institution as one shareholder).
We have not paid any cash dividends on LMI Series A and LMI
Series B common stock, and we have no present intention of
so doing. Payment of cash dividends, if any, in the future will
be determined by our Board of Directors in light of our
earnings, financial condition and other relevant considerations.
Pursuant to the Liberty Global merger agreement, neither we nor
UGC may pay any cash dividends on our respective common stocks
until the mergers contemplated thereby are completed or the
merger agreement is terminated. Except for the foregoing, there
are currently no restrictions on our ability to pay dividends in
cash or stock.
|
|
|
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans |
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference
to our definitive proxy statement for our 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
|
|
|
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities |
None
On July 19, 2004, our registration statement on
Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-116157) with
respect to our rights offering, was declared effective by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
In the rights offering, we incurred expenses aggregating
$3,771,000, which consisted of SEC registration fees and third
party vendor fees, such as printer costs, and we received
approximately $739,432,000 in gross proceeds. We used the net
proceeds of the rights offering to repay notes payable in the
aggregate principal amount of $116,666,000 to Liberty and to
repay $30 million of certain other indebtedness. We intend
to use the remaining net proceeds for general corporate
purposes, including for acquisitions and to make other
investments.
II-1
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The following table sets forth information concerning our
company’s purchase of its own equity securities during the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
(c) | |
|
(d) | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number | |
|
Maximum Number | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares | |
|
(or Approximate Dollar | |
| |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
Purchased as Part | |
|
Value) of Shares that | |
| |
|
Total Number | |
|
Average | |
|
of Publicly | |
|
May Yet Be Purchased | |
| |
|
of Shares | |
|
Price Paid | |
|
Announced Plans | |
|
Under the Plans | |
| Period |
|
Purchased | |
|
per Share | |
|
or Programs | |
|
or Programs | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
December 2004
|
|
|
3,000,000(1 |
) |
|
$ |
42.63 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
| (1) |
On December 7, 2004, we purchased 3,000,000 shares of LMI
Series A common stock from Comcast Corporation in a private
transaction for a cash purchase price of $127,890,000. |
|
|
| Item 6. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. |
The following tables present selected historical financial
information of (i) certain international cable television
and programming subsidiaries and assets of Liberty (LMC
International), for periods prior to the June 7, 2004 spin
off transaction, whereby LMI’s common stock was distributed
on a pro rata basis to Liberty’s stockholders as a
dividend, and (ii) LMI and its consolidated subsidiaries
for periods following such date. Upon consummation of the spin
off, LMI became the owner of the assets that comprise LMC
International. The following selected financial data was derived
from the audited consolidated financial statements of LMI as of
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and for the each of the
four years ended December 31, 2004. Data for other periods
has been derived from unaudited information. This information is
only a summary, and you should read it together with the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 (1) | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Summary Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in affiliates
|
|
$ |
1,865,642 |
|
|
|
1,740,552 |
|
|
|
1,145,382 |
|
|
|
423,326 |
|
|
|
1,189,630 |
|
|
Other investments
|
|
$ |
838,608 |
|
|
|
450,134 |
|
|
|
187,826 |
|
|
|
916,562 |
|
|
|
134,910 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
4,303,099 |
|
|
|
97,577 |
|
|
|
89,211 |
|
|
|
80,306 |
|
|
|
82,578 |
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
$ |
2,897,953 |
|
|
|
689,026 |
|
|
|
689,046 |
|
|
|
701,935 |
|
|
|
803,514 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
13,702,363 |
|
|
|
3,687,037 |
|
|
|
2,800,896 |
|
|
|
2,169,102 |
|
|
|
2,301,800 |
|
|
Debt, including current portion
|
|
$ |
5,018,787 |
|
|
|
54,126 |
|
|
|
35,286 |
|
|
|
338,466 |
|
|
|
101,415 |
|
|
Stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
5,226,806 |
|
|
|
3,418,568 |
|
|
|
2,708,893 |
|
|
|
2,039,593 |
|
|
|
1,907,085 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 (1) | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except per share amounts | |
|
Summary Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
2,644,284 |
|
|
|
108,390 |
|
|
|
100,255 |
|
|
|
139,535 |
|
|
|
125,246 |
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(313,873 |
) |
|
|
(1,455 |
) |
|
|
(39,145 |
) |
|
|
(122,623 |
) |
|
|
3,828 |
|
|
Share of earnings (losses) of affiliates(2)
|
|
$ |
38,710 |
|
|
|
13,739 |
|
|
|
(331,225 |
) |
|
|
(589,525 |
) |
|
|
(168,404 |
) |
|
Net earnings (loss)(3)
|
|
$ |
(31,758 |
) |
|
|
20,889 |
|
|
|
(568,154 |
) |
|
|
(820,355 |
) |
|
|
(129,694 |
) |
|
Net earnings (loss) per common share (pro forma for spin
off)(4)
|
|
$ |
(.20 |
) |
|
|
.14 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
| (1) |
Prior to January 1, 2004, the substantial majority of our
operations were conducted through equity method affiliates,
including UGC, J-COM and JPC. In January 2004, we completed a
transaction that |
II-2
|
|
|
increased our company’s ownership in UGC and enabled us to
fully exercise our voting rights with respect to our historical
investment in UGC. As a result, UGC has been accounted for as a
consolidated subsidiary and included in our company’s
consolidated financial position and results of operations since
January 1, 2004. For additional information, see
note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. |
| |
| (2) |
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets (Statement 142), which, among other
matters, provides that goodwill, intangible assets with
indefinite lives and excess costs that are considered equity
method goodwill are no longer amortized, but are evaluated for
impairment under Statement 142 and, in the case of equity method
goodwill, APB Opinion No. 18. Share of losses of affiliates
includes excess basis amortization of $92,902,000 and
$41,419,000 in 2001 and 2000, respectively. |
| |
| (3) |
Our net loss in 2002 and 2001 included our company’s share
of UGC’s net losses of $190,216,000 and $439,843,000,
respectively. Because we had no commitment to make additional
capital contributions to UGC, we suspended recording our share
of UGC’s losses when our carrying value was reduced to zero
in 2002. In addition, our net loss in 2002 included $247,386,000
of other-than-temporary declines in fair values of investments,
and our net loss in 2001 included $534,962,000 of realized and
unrealized losses on derivative instruments. |
| |
| (4) |
Earnings (loss) per common share amounts were computed
assuming that the shares issued in the spin off were outstanding
since January 1, 2003. In addition, the weighted average
share amounts for periods prior to July 26, 2004, the date
that certain subscription rights were distributed to
stockholders pursuant to a rights offering by our company, have
been increased to give effect to the benefit derived by our
company’s stockholders as a result of the distribution of
such subscription rights. For additional information, see
note 3 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
| Item 7. |
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
The capitalized terms used below have been defined in the notes
to the accompanying consolidated financial statements. In the
following text, the terms, “we,” “our,”
“our company” and “us” may refer, as the
context requires, to LMC International (prior to June 7,
2004), LMI and its consolidated subsidiaries (on and subsequent
to June 7, 2004) or both. Unless otherwise indicated,
convenience translations into U.S. dollars are calculated as of
December 31, 2004.
The following discussion and analysis provides information
concerning our results of operations and financial condition.
This discussion should be read in conjunction with our
accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto included elsewhere herein.
Overview
We own majority and minority interests in international
broadband distribution and programming companies. On
June 7, 2004, Liberty completed the spin off of LMI to
Liberty’s shareholders. In connection with the spin off,
holders of Liberty common stock on the June 1, 2004 Record
Date received 0.05 of a share of LMI Series A common stock
for each share of Liberty Series A common stock owned on
the Record Date and 0.05 of a share of LMI Series B common
stock for each share of Liberty Series B common stock owned
on the Record Date. The spin off was intended to qualify as a
tax-free spin off. For financial reporting purposes, the spin
off is deemed to have occurred on June 1, 2004.
Following the spin off, we and Liberty operate independently,
and neither has any stock ownership, beneficial or otherwise, in
the other.
II-3
Our operating subsidiaries and most significant equity method
investments are set forth below:
|
|
|
Operating subsidiaries at December 31,
2004: |
|
|
|
UGC
Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico
Pramer |
Our most significant subsidiary is UGC, an international
broadband communications provider of video, voice, and Internet
access services with operations in 13 European countries and
three Latin American countries. UGC’s largest operating
segments are located in The Netherlands, France, Austria and
Chile. At December 31, 2004, we owned approximately
423.8 million shares of UGC common stock, representing an
approximate 53.6% economic interest and a 91.0% voting interest.
As further described in note 5 to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements, we began consolidating UGC on
January 1, 2004. Prior to that date, we used the equity
method to account for our investment in UGC. As discussed in
greater detail in note 1 to the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, we have entered into a merger agreement
with UGC, whereby Liberty Global, a newly-formed holding
company, would acquire all of the capital stock of our company
and all of the capital stock of UGC not owned by our company.
Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico is a wholly-owned subsidiary
that owns and operates cable television systems in Puerto Rico.
Pramer is a wholly-owned Argentine programming company that
supplies programming services to cable television and DTH
satellite distributors in Latin America and Spain.
|
|
|
Significant equity method investments at
December 31, 2004: |
On December 28, 2004, our 45.45% ownership interest in
J-COM, and a 19.78% interest in J-COM owned by Sumitomo were
combined in Super Media. As a result of these transactions, we
held a 69.68% noncontrolling interest in Super Media, and Super
Media held a 65.23% controlling interest in J-COM at
December 31, 2004. Subject to certain conditions, Sumitomo
has the obligation to contribute to Super Media substantially
all of its remaining 12.25% equity interest in J-COM during
2005. At December 31, 2004, we accounted for our 69.68%
interest in Super Media using the equity method. As a result of
a change in the corporate governance of Super Media that
occurred on February 18, 2005, we will begin accounting for
Super Media as a consolidated subsidiary effective
January 1, 2005. J-COM owns and operates broadband
businesses in Japan. For additional information, see note 6
to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
JPC is a joint venture between Sumitomo and our company that
primarily develops, manages and distributes pay television
services in Japan on a platform-neutral basis through various
distribution infrastructures, principally cable and DTH service
providers.
We believe our primary opportunities in our international
markets include continued growth in subscribers; increasing the
average revenue per unit by continuing to rollout broadband
communication services such as telephone, Internet access and
digital video; developing foreign programming businesses; and
maximizing operating efficiencies on a regional basis. Potential
impediments to achieving these goals include increasing price
competition for broadband services; competition from alternative
video distribution technologies; and availability of sufficient
capital to finance the rollout of new services.
Results of Operations
Due to the January 1, 2004 change from the equity method to
the consolidation method of accounting for our investment in
UGC, our historical revenue and expenses for 2004 are not
comparable to prior year periods. Accordingly, in addition to a
discussion of our historical results of operations, we have also
included an analysis of our operating results based on the
approach we use to analyze our reportable operating segments. As
further described below, we believe that our operating segment
discussion provides a more meaningful basis for comparing
UGC’s operating results than does our historical discussion.
II-4
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates have a significant
impact on our operating results as all of our operating
segments, except Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico, have
functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Our
primary exposure is currently to the euro as over 50% of our
U.S dollar revenue during 2004 was derived from countries
where the euro is the functional currency. In addition, our
operating results are also significantly impacted by changes in
the exchange rates for the Japanese yen, Chilean peso and, to a
lesser degree, other local currencies in Europe.
Discussion and Analysis of Historical Operating
Results
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
As noted above, we began consolidating UGC effective
January 1, 2004. Unless otherwise indicated in the
discussion below, the significant increases in our historical
revenue, expenses and other items during 2004, as compared to
2003, are primarily attributable to this change in our
consolidated reporting entities.
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation charges |
We incurred stock-based compensation expense of $142,762,000 and
$4,088,000 during 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 2004 amount,
which includes $116,661,000 of compensation expense related to
UGC stock incentive awards, is primarily a function of higher
UGC and LMI stock prices and additional vesting of stock
incentive awards. As a result of adjustments to certain terms of
UGC and LMI stock incentive awards that were outstanding at
the time of their respective rights offerings in February 2004
and July 2004, most of the UGC and LMI stock incentive
awards outstanding at December 31, 2004 are accounted for
as variable-plan awards. A $50,409,000 first quarter 2004
charge was recorded by UGC to reflect a change from fixed-plan
accounting to variable-plan accounting. Due to the use of
variable-plan accounting by LMI and UGC, stock compensation
expense with respect to LMI and Liberty options held by LMI
employees and UGC stock incentive awards held by UGC
employees is subject to adjustment based on the market value of
the underlying common stock and vesting schedules, and
ultimately on the final determination of market value when the
incentive awards are exercised.
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
We recorded charges to reflect the impairment of long-lived
assets of $69,353,000 during 2004. This amount includes a
$26,000,000 charge to write-off enterprise level goodwill
associated with Pramer. This charge was triggered by our third
quarter 2004 determination that it was more-likely-than-not that
we would sell Pramer. Other impairment charges during 2004
include $16,111,000 related to the write-down of certain of
UGC’s long-lived telecommunications assets in Norway and
$10,955,000 related to the write-down of certain of UGC’s
tangible fixed assets in The Netherlands.
|
|
|
Restructuring and Other Charges |
During 2004, UGC recorded aggregate restructuring and other
charges of $29,018,000, including (i) $21,660,000 related
to its operations in The Netherlands, (ii) $4,172,000
relating to certain of its other operations in Europe and
(iii) $3,186,00 for certain benefits of the former Chief
Executive Officer of UGC. For additional information, see
note 17 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income |
Interest and dividend income increased $40,733,000 during 2004,
as compared to 2003. The increase includes $23,823,000 that is
attributable to the January 1, 2004 consolidation of UGC.
The remaining increase is primarily attributable to dividend
income on the ABC Family preferred stock, a 99.9% interest
in which was contributed by Liberty to our company in connection
with the spin off.
II-5
|
|
|
Share of earnings of affiliates, net |
Our share of earnings of affiliates increased $24,971,000 during
2004, as compared to 2003. Such increase primarily is
attributable to increases in our share of the net earnings of
J-COM and, to a lesser extent, JPC. Such increases were
partially offset by write-downs of our investments in Torneos y
Competencias S.A., (Torneos) and another programming entity
that operates in Latin America to reflect other-than-temporary
declines in the fair values of these investments. The increase
in J-COM’s net earnings is primarily attributable to
revenue growth due to increases in the subscribers to
J-COM’s telephone, Internet and cable television services.
For additional discussion of J-COM’s operating results, see
“Discussion and Analysis of Reportable
Segments” below. During 2003, we did not recognize our
share of UGC’s losses as our investment in UGC previously
had been reduced to zero and we had no commitment to make
additional investments in UGC. For additional information, see
note 6 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative
instruments, net |
The details of our realized and unrealized gains
(losses) on derivative instruments are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Foreign exchange derivatives
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
(22,626 |
) |
|
Total return debt swaps
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
37,804 |
|
|
Cross-currency and interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(43,779 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
(20,318 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Variable forward transaction
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Call agreements on LMI Series A common stock
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
(54,947 |
) |
|
|
12,762 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For additional information concerning our derivative
instruments, see note 8 to the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses), net |
The details of our foreign currency transaction gains
(losses) are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Repayment of yen denominated shareholder loans(a)
|
|
$ |
56,061 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
U.S. dollar debt issued by UGC’s European subsidiaries
|
|
|
35,684 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Intercompany notes denominated in a currency other than the
entities’ functional currency
|
|
|
46,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar debt issued and cash held by VTR
|
|
|
3,929 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Euro denominated debt issued by UGC
|
|
|
(77,255 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Euro denominated cash held by UGC
|
|
|
26,192 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Pramer (primarily U.S. dollar denominated debt)
|
|
|
(730 |
) |
|
|
2,461 |
|
|
Telewest bonds
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
Yen denominated cash held by LMI
|
|
|
7,408 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(5,666 |
) |
|
|
1,201 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
92,305 |
|
|
|
5,412 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-6
|
|
| (a) |
On December 21, 2004, we received cash proceeds of
¥43,809 million ($420,188,000 at December 21,
2004) in connection with the repayment by J-COM and another
affiliate of all principal and interest due to our company
pursuant to then outstanding shareholder loans. In connection
with this transaction, we recognized in our statement of
operations the foreign currency translation gains that
previously had been reflected in accumulated other comprehensive
earnings. |
Through December 31, 2004, we have incurred cumulative
translation losses with respect to our equity method investments
in Torneos, an Argentine programming company, and
Metrópolis, a Chilean cable company, of $86,446,000 and
$30,338,000, respectively. Such amounts are included in other
comprehensive earnings, net of taxes, in our December 31,
2004 consolidated balance sheet. Upon any disposition of all or
a part of these investments, we would recognize the pro rata
share of such losses in our statements of operations. Neither
investment was deemed to be held for sale at December 31,
2004.
|
|
|
Gains on exchanges of investment securities |
During 2004, we recognized pre-tax gains aggregating
$178,818,000 on exchanges of investment securities, including a
$168,301,000 gain that is attributable to the July 19, 2004
conversion of our investment in Telewest Communications plc
Senior Notes and Senior Discount Notes into 18,417,883 shares or
approximately 7.5% of the issued and outstanding common stock of
Telewest. This gain represents the excess of the fair value of
the Telewest common stock received over our cost basis in the
Senior Notes and Senior Discount Notes.
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary declines in fair values of
investments |
We recognized other-than-temporary declines in fair values of
investments of $18,542,000 and $6,884,000 during 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The 2004 amount includes a $12,429,000 charge
recognized during the third quarter of 2004 in connection with
our decision to dispose of all remaining Telewest shares during
the fourth quarter of 2004.
|
|
|
Gains on extinguishment of debt |
During 2004, we recognized gains on extinguishment of debt of
$35,787,000. Such gains included a $31,916,000 gain recognized
by UGC in connection with the first quarter 2004 consummation of
UPC Polska’s plan of reorganization and emergence from
U.S. bankruptcy proceedings. For additional information, see
note 10 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
Gains (losses) on disposition of investments, net |
We recognized net gains on dispositions of investments of
$43,714,000 and $3,759,000 during 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The 2004 amount includes (i) a $37,174,000 gain on the sale
of News Corp. Class A common stock, (ii) a $25,256,000
gain in connection with the contribution to JPC of certain
indirect interests in an equity method affiliate, (iii) a
$16,407,000 net loss on the disposition of 18,417,883 Telewest
shares, (iv) a $10,000,000 loss on the sale of Sky
Multi-Country, and a (v) a $6,878,000 gain associated with
the redemption of our investment in certain bonds. For
additional information, see notes 6 and 7 to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
We recognized income tax benefit (expense) of $17,449,000
and ($27,975,000) during 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 2004
tax benefit differs from the expected tax benefit of $80,110,000
(based on the U.S. federal 35% income tax rate) due
primarily to (i) the reduction of UGC’s deferred tax
assets as a result of tax rate reductions in The Netherlands,
France, the Czech Republic, and Austria; (ii) the impact of
certain permanent differences between the financial and tax
accounting treatment of interest and other items associated with
cross jurisdictional intercompany loans and investments;
(iii) the realization of taxable foreign currency gains in
certain jurisdictions not recognized for financial reporting
purposes, (iv) a net increase in
II-7
UGC’s valuation allowance associated with reserves
established against currently arising tax loss carryforwards
that were only partially offset by the release of valuation
allowances in other jurisdictions. Certain of the released
valuation allowances were related to deferred tax assets that
were recorded in purchase accounting and accordingly, such
valuation allowances were reversed against goodwill. The items
mentioned above were partially offset by (i) the reversal
of a deferred tax liability originally recorded for a gain on
extinguishment of debt in a 2002 merger transaction as a result
of the emergence of Old UGC from bankruptcy in November 2004;
(ii) the recognition of tax losses or deferred tax assets
for the sale of investments or subsidiaries and (iii) a
deferred tax benefit that we recorded during the third quarter
of 2004 to reflect a reduction in the estimated blended state
tax rate used to compute our net deferred tax liabilities. Such
reduction represents a change in estimate that resulted from our
re-evaluation of this rate upon our becoming a separate tax
paying entity in connection with the spin off. The difference
between the actual tax expense and the expected tax expense of
$17,111,000 (based on the U.S. Federal 35% income tax rate)
during 2003 is primarily attributable to foreign, state and
local taxes. For additional details, see note 11 to
the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 |
Revenue increased $8,135,000 or 8.1% during 2003, as compared to
2002. The increase was due primarily to a $7,495,000 increase in
revenue generated by Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico. The
increase in the revenue of Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico is
due primarily to a $3,685,000 increase in revenue from cable
television services, a $1,772,000 increase in broadband Internet
revenue and a $1,255,000 increase in equipment rental income.
The increase in revenue from cable television services is due
primarily to the net effect of (i) increases associated
with higher rates and an increase in the number of digital cable
subscribers and (ii) decreases associated with an
approximate 1% decrease in the number of subscribers to basic
cable services. The increase in Liberty Cablevision Puerto
Rico’s equipment rental revenue is due primarily to the
increase in digital cable subscribers.
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses |
Operating costs and expenses increased $6,375,000 or 14.5%
during 2003, as compared to 2002. The increase was due primarily
to increases in the operating costs and expenses of both Liberty
Cablevision Puerto Rico and Pramer. Higher programming rates and
an increase in the number of subscribers receiving the digital
programming tier of service contributed to an increase in
programming costs that accounted for most of the $4,103,000
increase in Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico’s operating
expenses. The increase in Pramer’s operating costs and
expenses is attributable to individually insignificant items.
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses |
SG&A expenses decreased $1,932,000 or 4.6% during 2003, as
compared to 2002. The decrease is due primarily to a $4,596,000
decrease in SG&A expenses incurred by Pramer, offset by a
$2,584,000 increase in SG&A expenses incurred by Liberty
Cablevision Puerto Rico. The decrease in Pramer’s SG&A
expenses is due primarily to a decrease in bad debt expense as
Pramer experienced unusually high bad debt expense during 2002
as a result of poor economic conditions in Argentina and the
devaluation of the Argentine peso. The increase in Liberty
Cablevision Puerto Rico’s SG&A expense is due to
increases in salaries and related personnel costs and other
individually insignificant items. The increase in salaries and
personnel costs is primarily related to increased headcount
required to support Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico’s
launch of its broadband Internet service.
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation charges (credits) |
We had stock-based compensation charges of $4,088,000 in 2003
and credits of $5,815,000 in 2002. The stock compensation
amounts reflected in our statements of operations during these
periods were based on stock appreciation rights held by Liberty
employees who performed services for our company. The stock
II-8
compensation amounts recorded during 2003 and 2002 are primarily
a function of the market price of Liberty common stock and the
vesting of the awards.
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
Depreciation and amortization increased $2,027,000 or 15.5%
during 2003, as compared to 2002. The increase in depreciation
and amortization is primarily due to an increase in the
depreciable tangible assets of Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico
as a result of capital additions.
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
We recorded charges to reflect the impairment of long-lived
assets of $45,928,000 during 2002, including charges of
$39,000,000 and $5,000,000 to reflect the write-off of
enterprise goodwill associated with our investments in
Metrópolis and Torneos, respectively. We recorded the
Metrópolis impairment in connection with an evaluation of
the carrying value of our investment in Metrópolis as more
fully described below. The Torneos impairment resulted primarily
from the devaluation of the Argentine peso.
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income |
We recognized interest and dividend income of $24,874,000 and
$25,883,000 during 2003 and 2002, respectively. The $1,009,000
decrease during 2003 is primarily attributable to a decrease in
interest income from the Belmarken Loan that was largely offset
by increases in (i) interest income earned on shareholder
loans to J-COM and (ii) other sources of interest income.
The Belmarken Loan represented debt of a UGC subsidiary, and we
contributed the Belmarken Loan to UGC in connection with the
2002 UGC Transaction.
|
|
|
Share of earnings (losses) of affiliates, net |
A summary of our share of earnings (losses) of affiliates,
net, is included below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
J-COM
|
|
$ |
20,341 |
|
|
|
(21,595 |
) |
|
JPC
|
|
|
11,775 |
|
|
|
5,801 |
|
|
Metrópolis
|
|
|
(8,291 |
) |
|
|
(80,394 |
) |
|
UGC
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(190,216 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(10,086 |
) |
|
|
(44,821 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
13,739 |
|
|
|
(331,225 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in share of losses in 2003 and 2002 are adjustments for
other-than-temporary declines in value aggregating $12,616,000
and $72,030,000, respectively. The 2002 amount includes
$66,555,000 associated with Metrópolis. The Metrópolis
impairment was recorded as a result of a decline in value
associated with increased competition and subscriber losses.
As noted above, we did not recognize our share of UGC’s
losses during 2003 as our investment in UGC previously had been
reduced to zero and we had no commitment to make additional
investments in UGC.
II-9
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative
instruments, net |
The details of our realized and unrealized gains
(losses) on derivative instruments, net, are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Foreign exchange derivatives
|
|
$ |
(22,626 |
) |
|
|
(11,239 |
) |
|
Total return debt swaps
|
|
|
37,804 |
|
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
(4,378 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
12,762 |
|
|
|
(16,705 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses), net |
The details of our foreign currency transaction gains (losses),
net are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Pramer (primarily U.S. dollar denominated debt) (a)
|
|
$ |
2,461 |
|
|
|
(12,290 |
) |
|
Telewest bonds
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
3,603 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
5,412 |
|
|
|
(8,267 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (a) |
The foreign currency losses experienced by Pramer during 2002
are attributable to the devaluation of the Argentine peso. |
|
|
|
Gains on exchanges of investment securities |
On January 30, 2002, our company and UGC completed the 2002
UGC Transaction pursuant to which UGC was formed to own Old UGC.
Upon consummation of the 2002 UGC Transaction, all shares of
Old UGC common stock were exchanged for shares of common
stock of UGC. In addition, we contributed to UGC (i) cash
consideration of $200,000,000, (ii) the Belmarken Loan,
with an accreted value of $891,671,000 and a carrying value of
$495,603,000 and (iii) Senior Notes and Senior Discount
Notes of UPC, a subsidiary of Old UGC, with an aggregate
carrying amount of $270,398,000, in exchange for
281.3 million shares of UGC Class C common stock with
a fair value of $1,406,441,000. We accounted for the 2002 UGC
Transaction as the acquisition of an additional noncontrolling
interest in UGC in exchange for monetary financial instruments.
Accordingly, we calculated a $440,440,000 gain on the
transaction based on the difference between the estimated fair
value of the financial instruments and their carrying value. Due
to our continuing indirect ownership in the assets contributed
to UGC, we limited the amount of gain we recognized to the
minority shareholders’ attributable share (approximately
28%) of such assets or $122,618,000 (before deferred tax expense
of $47,821,000).
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary declines in fair values of
investments |
During 2003 and 2002, we determined that certain of our cost
investments experienced other-than-temporary declines in value.
As a result, the cost bases of such investments were adjusted to
their respective fair values based on quoted market prices and
discounted cash flow analysis. These adjustments are reflected
as other-
II-10
than-temporary declines in fair value of investments in the
consolidated statements of operations. The details of our
other-than-temporary declines in fair value of investments are
as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended | |
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in | |
| |
|
thousands | |
|
Sky Latin America
|
|
$ |
6,884 |
|
|
|
105,250 |
|
|
Telewest bonds
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
141,271 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
865 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
6,884 |
|
|
|
247,386 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impairment of our investment in Sky Latin America was
primarily a function of economic conditions in the countries in
which Sky Latin America operates. The amount of the Sky Latin
America impairment was based on discounted cash flow analysis.
The carrying value of the Telewest bonds was reduced based on
quoted market prices at the balance sheet date.
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
We recognized income tax benefit (expense) of ($27,975,000)
and $166,121,000 during 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2003
tax expense differs from the expected tax expense of $17,111,000
(based on the U.S. federal 35% income tax rate) primarily
due to foreign, state and local taxes. The 2002 tax expense
differs from the expected tax benefit of $173,593,000 (based on
the U.S. federal 35% income tax rate) as the effect of state,
local and foreign tax benefits was more than offset by the
impact of certain non-deductible expenses and other individually
insignificant items. For additional information, see
note 11 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes |
We and our subsidiaries adopted Statement 142 effective
January 1, 2002. Upon adoption, we determined that the
carrying value of certain of our reporting units (including
allocated goodwill) was not recoverable. Accordingly, in the
first quarter of 2002, we recorded an impairment loss of
$238,267,000, after deducting taxes of $103,105,000, as the
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. This
transitional impairment loss includes a pre-tax adjustment of
$264,372,000 for our proportionate share of transition
adjustments that UGC recorded.
Discussion and Analysis of Reportable Segments
For purposes of evaluating the performance of our operating
segments, we compare and analyze 100% of the revenue and
operating cash flow of our reportable operating segments
regardless of whether we use the consolidation or equity method
to account for such reportable segments. Accordingly, in the
following tables, we have presented 100% of the revenue,
operating expenses, SG&A expenses and operating cash flow of
our reportable segments, notwithstanding the fact that we used
the equity method to account for (i) UGC during the 2003
and 2002 periods and (ii) our equity method investment in
J-COM for all periods presented. The revenue, operating
expenses, SG&A expenses and operating cash flow of UGC for
the 2003 and 2002 periods and J-COM for all periods presented
are then eliminated to arrive at the reported amounts. It should
be noted, however, that this presentation is not in accordance
with GAAP since the results of operations of equity method
investments are required to be reported on a net basis. Further,
we could not, among other things, cause any noncontrolled
affiliate to distribute to us our proportionate share of the
revenue or operating cash flow of such affiliate. For additional
information concerning our operating segments, including a
discussion of our performance measures and a reconciliation of
operating cash flow to pre-tax earnings (loss), see note 20
to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
II-11
The tables presented below in this section provide a separate
analysis of each of the line items that comprise operating cash
flow (revenue, operating expenses and SG&A expenses) as well
as an analysis of operating cash flow by operating segment for
2004 compared to 2003 and 2003 compared to 2002. In each case,
the tables present (i) the amounts reported by each of our
operating segments for the comparative periods, (ii) the
U.S. dollar change and percentage change from period to period,
and (iii) the U.S. dollar equivalent of the change and the
percentage change from period to period, after removing foreign
currency effects (FX). The comparisons that exclude FX assume
that exchange rates remained constant during the periods that
are included in each table.
UGC Broadband — France acquired Noos on July 1,
2004. Accordingly, increases in the amounts presented for UGC
Broadband — France during 2004, as compared to the
corresponding prior year periods, are primarily attributable to
the Noos acquisition. In addition, UGC has included Chorus
Communications Limited (Chorus), a wholly owned subsidiary of
PHL and a cable operator in Ireland, in its consolidated
financial statements since June 1, 2004. Accordingly,
increases in the amounts presented for UGC Broadband —
Other Europe during 2004, as compared to 2003, are partially
attributable to the operations of Chorus since June 1,
2004. In addition, the third quarter 2002 deconsolidation of
UGC’s broadband operations in Germany factors into the 2003
to 2002 comparisons. For additional information concerning the
Noos acquisition and the PHL transactions, see note 5 to
the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Revenue of our Reportable Segments
|
|
|
Revenue — Years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
excluding FX | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except % amounts | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
716,932 |
|
|
|
592,223 |
|
|
|
124,709 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
60,999 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
312,792 |
|
|
|
113,946 |
|
|
|
198,846 |
|
|
|
174.5 |
% |
|
|
187,462 |
|
|
|
164.5 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
299,874 |
|
|
|
260,162 |
|
|
|
39,712 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
13,268 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
752,900 |
|
|
|
561,737 |
|
|
|
191,163 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
134,926 |
|
|
|
24.0 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe
|
|
|
2,082,498 |
|
|
|
1,528,068 |
|
|
|
554,430 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
396,655 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
299,951 |
|
|
|
229,835 |
|
|
|
70,116 |
|
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
36,314 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
J-COM
|
|
|
1,504,709 |
|
|
|
1,233,492 |
|
|
|
271,217 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
156,706 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
400,818 |
|
|
|
369,072 |
|
|
|
31,746 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
(3,835 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
%) |
|
Elimination of intercompany transactions
|
|
|
(138,983 |
) |
|
|
(127,055 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(1,504,709 |
) |
|
|
(3,125,022 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
2,644,284 |
|
|
|
108,390 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M. — Not Meaningful
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands |
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands’ revenue
increased 21.1% in 2004, as compared to 2003. Excluding the
effects of foreign exchange fluctuations, such increase was
10.3%. The local currency increase is primarily attributable to
an increase in the average monthly revenue per subscriber, due
primarily to higher average rates for cable television services
and the increased penetration of broadband Internet services.
These factors were somewhat offset by reduced tariffs for
telephone services as lower outbound interconnect rates were
passed through to the customer to maintain the product at a
competitive level in the market. The average number of
subscribers in 2004 was slightly higher than the comparable
number in 2003 as increases in broadband Internet and telephone
subscribers were largely offset by a decline in cable television
subscribers.
II-12
UGC previously announced that it would increase rates for analog
video customers in The Netherlands towards a standard rate,
effective January 1, 2004. As previously reported, UGC has
been enjoined from, or has voluntarily waived, implementing
these rate increases in certain cities within The Netherlands.
Thus far, UGC has reached agreement with most of these
municipalities, including the municipality of Amsterdam,
allowing it to increase its cable tariffs to a standard rate of
€15.20. UGC is
continuing to negotiate with the other municipalities.
UGC Broadband — France’s revenue in 2004 includes
$183,930,000 generated by Noos. Excluding the increase
associated with the Noos acquisition and the $11,384,000
increase associated with foreign exchange fluctuations, UGC
Broadband — France’s revenue increased $3,532,000
or 3.1% in 2004, as compared to 2003. This 3.1% increase is
primarily attributable to an increase in the average number of
subscribers in 2004, as compared to 2003. Cable television,
broadband Internet and telephone services all contributed to
this subscriber increase. A decrease in the average monthly
revenue per telephone subscriber partially offset the positive
impact of the subscriber increases. The lower telephone revenue
is attributable to lower tariffs from telephone services, as
lower outbound interconnect rates were passed through to the
customer to maintain the service at a competitive level in the
market, as well as reduced outbound telephone traffic as more
customers migrate from dial-up Internet access to broadband
Internet access and migrate from fixed-line telephone usage to
cellular phone usage.
UGC Broadband — Austria’s revenue increased 15.3%
in 2004, as compared to 2003. Excluding the effects of foreign
exchange fluctuations, such increase was 5.1%. The local
currency increase is primarily attributable to growth in the
average number of subscribers in 2004, as compared to 2003. This
subscriber growth is primarily attributable to an increase in
the average number of subscribers to broadband Internet service.
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe |
UGC Broadband — Other Europe includes broadband
operations in Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Ireland, Hungary, Poland,
Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Slovenia and Romania. UGC
Broadband — Other Europe’s revenue in 2004
includes $48,953,000 of revenue generated by Chorus. Excluding
the increase associated with the 2004 Chorus acquisition and the
$56,237,000 increase associated with foreign exchange
fluctuations, UGC Broadband — Other Europe’s
revenue increased $85,973,000 or 15.3% during 2004, as compared
to 2003. The 15.3% increase is due primarily to increases in the
average monthly revenue per subscriber across all of the UGC
Broadband — Other Europe countries. An overall
increase in the average number of cable television and broadband
Internet subscribers in 2004, as compared to 2003, also
contributed to the increase.
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR) |
UGC Broadband — Chile’s revenue increased 30.5%
during 2004, as compared to 2003. Excluding the effects of
foreign exchange fluctuations, such increase was 15.8%. This
15.8% increase is due primarily to growth in the average number
of subscribers to cable television, broadband Internet and
telephone services during 2004, as compared to 2003. This
subscriber growth is due primarily to improved direct sales,
mass marketing initiatives and lower subscriber churn. UGC
Broadband — Chile’s average monthly revenue per
subscriber remained relatively flat from period to period due
primarily to significant competition in UGC
Broadband — Chile’s markets.
J-COM’s revenue increased 22.0% during 2004, as compared to
2003. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange fluctuations,
such increase was 12.7%. The local currency increase is
primarily attributable to a significant increase in the average
number of subscribers in 2004, as compared to 2003. Most of this
subscriber
II-13
increase is attributable to growth within J-COM’s telephone
and broadband Internet services. An increase in average revenue
per household per month also contributed to the increase in
local currency revenue. The increase in average revenue per
household per month is primarily attributable to the full-year
effect of cable television service price increases implemented
during 2003 and increased penetration of J-COM’s
higher-priced broadband Internet service. These factors were
somewhat offset by a reduction in the price for one of
J-COM’s lower-priced broadband Internet services and a
decrease in customer call volumes for J-COM’s telephone
service.
|
|
|
Revenue — Years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
excluding FX | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except % amounts | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
592,223 |
|
|
|
459,044 |
|
|
|
133,179 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
% |
|
|
35,346 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
113,946 |
|
|
|
92,441 |
|
|
|
21,505 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
260,162 |
|
|
|
198,189 |
|
|
|
61,973 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
19,026 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
561,737 |
|
|
|
461,149 |
|
|
|
100,588 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
34,034 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe
|
|
|
1,528,068 |
|
|
|
1,210,823 |
|
|
|
317,245 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
91,087 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
229,835 |
|
|
|
186,426 |
|
|
|
43,409 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
|
42,319 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
J-COM
|
|
|
1,233,492 |
|
|
|
930,736 |
|
|
|
302,756 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
211,703 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
369,072 |
|
|
|
326,722 |
|
|
|
42,350 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
(8,448 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
|
Elimination of intercompany transactions
|
|
|
(127,055 |
) |
|
|
(108,695 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(3,125,022 |
) |
|
|
(2,445,757 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
108,390 |
|
|
|
100,255 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M. — Not Meaningful
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands |
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands’ revenue
increased 29.0% in 2003, as compared to 2002. Excluding the
effects of foreign exchange fluctuations, such increase was
7.7%. The local currency increase is due primarily to rate
increases for cable television services. The average number of
subscribers in 2003 increased slightly over the comparable
number in 2002 as increases in broadband Internet subscribers
were largely offset by decreases in cable television and
telephone subscribers.
UGC Broadband — France’s revenue increased 23.3%
in 2003, as compared to 2002. Excluding the effects of foreign
exchange fluctuations, revenue increased 2.9% in 2003, as
compared to 2002. This local currency increase is primarily
attributable to increases in the average number of subscribers
to cable television, and to a lesser extent, broadband Internet
and telephone services in 2003, as compared to 2002. UGC
Broadband — France’s average monthly revenue per
subscriber declined slightly as the positive impact of increased
penetration of broadband Internet services was more than offset
by lower telephony revenue and an increase in the proportion of
subscribers to lower-priced tiers within the total number of
subscribers for cable television services.
UGC Broadband — Austria’s revenue increased 31.3%
in 2003, as compared to 2002. Excluding the effects of foreign
exchange fluctuations, such increase was 9.6%. The local
currency increase is due primarily to increases in the average
number of broadband Internet and telephone subscribers during
2003, as compared to
II-14
2002. An increase in the average monthly revenue per subscriber,
due primarily to the increased penetration of broadband Internet
services, also contributed to the increase.
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe |
UGC Broadband — Other Europe’s revenue increased
21.8% during 2003, as compared to 2002. Excluding the
$28,069,000 decrease associated with the third quarter 2002
deconsolidation of UGC’s broadband operations in Germany
and the $66,554,000 increase associated with foreign exchange
fluctuations, UGC Broadband — Other Europe’s
revenue increased $62,103,000 or 14.3% in 2003, as compared to
2002. The local currency revenue increase is attributable to
increases in average monthly revenue per subscriber across all
of the UGC Broadband — Other Europe countries. An
overall increase in the average number of cable television and
broadband Internet subscribers in 2004, as compared to 2003,
also contributed to the increase.
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR) |
UGC Broadband — Chile’s revenue increased 23.3%
in 2003, as compared to 2002. Excluding the effects of foreign
exchange fluctuations, such increase was 22.7%. The local
currency increase was primarily due to an increase in the
average number of subscribers in 2003, as compared to 2002. The
subscriber increase is attributable to the increased
effectiveness of UGC Broadband — Chile’s direct
sales force and mass marketing initiatives for its broadband
Internet services, and to increased premium tier customers. In
addition, UGC Broadband — Chile’s average monthly
revenue per subscriber was favorably impacted by a decrease in
promotions and price discounts.
J-COM’s revenue increased 32.5% during 2003, as compared to
2002. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange fluctuations,
such increase was 22.7%. The local currency increases are
primarily attributable to a significant increase in the average
number of subscribers in 2003, as compared to 2002. Most of this
subscriber increase is attributable to growth within
J-COM’s telephone and broadband Internet services. An
increase in average revenue per household per month during 2003,
as compared to 2002, also contributed to the increase in local
currency revenue. The increases in average revenue per household
per month is primarily attributable to the effect of cable
television service price increases and increased penetration of
J-COM’s higher-priced broadband Internet service. These
factors were somewhat offset by a reduction in the prices for
J-COM’s lower-priced broadband Internet services and a
decrease in customer call volumes for J-COM’s telephone
service.
II-15
Operating Expenses of our Reportable Segments
|
|
|
Operating expenses — Years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
excluding FX | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except % amounts | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
243,975 |
|
|
|
229,653 |
|
|
|
14,322 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
(8,038 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
)% |
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
168,634 |
|
|
|
67,160 |
|
|
|
101,474 |
|
|
|
151.1 |
% |
|
|
94,427 |
|
|
|
140.6 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
136,675 |
|
|
|
118,457 |
|
|
|
18,218 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
5,686 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
329,669 |
|
|
|
259,045 |
|
|
|
70,624 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
44,952 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe
|
|
|
878,953 |
|
|
|
674,315 |
|
|
|
204,638 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
137,027 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
116,131 |
|
|
|
96,965 |
|
|
|
19,166 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
5,818 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
J-COM
|
|
|
502,488 |
|
|
|
429,911 |
|
|
|
72,577 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
34,243 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
201,819 |
|
|
|
181,581 |
|
|
|
20,238 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
5,909 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
Elimination of intercompany transactions
|
|
|
(128,611 |
) |
|
|
(117,423 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(502,488 |
) |
|
|
(1,215,043 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
1,068,292 |
|
|
|
50,306 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M. — Not Meaningful
Operating expenses include programming, network operations and
other direct costs. Programming costs, which represent a
significant portion of our operating costs, are expected to rise
in future periods as a result of the expansion of service
offerings and the potential for price increases. Any cost
increases that we are not able to pass on to our subscribers
through service rate increases would result in increased
pressure on our operating margins.
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe |
Operating expenses for UGC Broadband — Total Europe
increased 30.3% in 2004, as compared to 2003. Operating expenses
for UGC Broadband — France and UGC
Broadband — Other Europe include $92,076,000 and
$11,451,000 incurred by Noos and Chorus, respectively, both of
which were acquired in 2004. Excluding the $103,527,000 increase
associated with the 2004 Noos and Chorus acquisitions and the
$67,611,000 increase associated with foreign exchange rate
fluctuations, UGC Broadband — Total Europe’s
operating expenses increased $33,500,000 or 5.0% in 2004, as
compared to 2003, primarily due to the net effect of the
following factors:
|
|
| |
(i) an increase in customer operation expenses as a result
of higher numbers of new and reconnecting subscribers during
2004, as compared to 2003. This higher activity level required
UGC to hire additional staff and use outsourced contractors; |
| |
| |
(ii) an increase in direct programming costs related to
subscriber growth and, in certain markets, an increase in
channels on the analog and digital platforms; |
| |
| |
(iii) a decrease due to net cost reductions across network
operations, customer care and billing and collection activities.
These reductions were due to improved cost controls across all
aspects of the business, including more effective procurement of
support services, lower billing and collections charges, with
bad debt charges in particular reduced in The Netherlands, and
the increasing operational leverage of the business; |
| |
| |
(iv) an increase in intercompany costs for broadband
Internet services under the revenue sharing agreement between
UPC Broadband and chellomedia; |
II-16
|
|
| |
(v) a decrease related to reduced telephone direct costs in
2004, as compared to 2003, primarily due to decreases in
outbound interconnect rates; |
| |
| |
(vi) an increase due to annual wage increases; and |
| |
| |
(vii) a decrease due to cost savings in The Netherlands
resulting from a restructuring plan implemented in the second
quarter of 2004 whereby the management structure was changed
from a three-region model to a centralized management
organization. |
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR) |
UGC Broadband — Chile’s operating expenses
increased 19.8% for 2004, as compared to 2003. Excluding the
effects of foreign exchange fluctuations, such increase was
6.0%. The local currency increase primarily is due to increases
in (i) domestic and international access charges,
(ii) programming costs, and (iii) the cost of
maintenance and technical services. Such increased costs were
largely driven by subscriber growth.
J-COM operating expenses increased 16.9% during 2004, as
compared to 2003. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange
fluctuations, such increase was 8.0%. These local currency
increases primarily are due to an increase in programming costs
as a result of subscriber growth and improved service offerings.
Increases in network maintenance and technical support costs
associated with the expansion of J-COM’s network also
contributed to the increases.
|
|
|
Operating expenses — Years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 |
An analysis of the operating expenses of our reportable segments
for the indicated periods is set forth below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
excluding FX | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except % amounts | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
229,653 |
|
|
|
251,614 |
|
|
|
(21,961 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
)% |
|
|
(58,878 |
) |
|
|
(23.4 |
)% |
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
67,160 |
|
|
|
72,120 |
|
|
|
(4,960 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
)% |
|
|
(15,794 |
) |
|
|
(21.9 |
)% |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
118,457 |
|
|
|
100,849 |
|
|
|
17,608 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
)% |
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
259,045 |
|
|
|
236,685 |
|
|
|
22,360 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
% |
|
|
(6,750 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe
|
|
|
674,315 |
|
|
|
661,268 |
|
|
|
13,047 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
(82,834 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
)% |
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
96,965 |
|
|
|
93,243 |
|
|
|
3,722 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
J-COM
|
|
|
429,911 |
|
|
|
366,828 |
|
|
|
63,083 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
31,348 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
181,581 |
|
|
|
175,639 |
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
(19,118 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
)% |
|
Elimination of intercompany transactions
|
|
|
(117,423 |
) |
|
|
(96,762 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(1,215,043 |
) |
|
|
(1,156,285 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
50,306 |
|
|
|
43,931 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M. — Not Meaningful
II-17
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe |
Operating expenses for UGC Broadband — Total Europe
increased 2.0% in 2003, as compared to 2002. Excluding the
$14,332,000 decrease associated with the third quarter 2002
deconsolidation of UGC’s Broadband operations in Germany
and the $95,881,000 increase associated with foreign exchange
rate fluctuations, UGC Broadband — Total Europe’s
operating expenses decreased $68,502,000 or 10.4% in 2003, as
compared to 2002, primarily due to:
|
|
| |
(i) a decrease associated with improved cost control across
all aspects of the business, including the benefit of
restructuring activities, other cost cutting initiatives,
continued improvements in processes and systems and
organizational rationalization. In addition, more effective
procurement processes resulted in improved terms from major
vendors; and |
| |
| |
(ii) a decrease in billing and collection charges,
reflecting improved receivables management and lower bad debt
charges, particularly in The Netherlands and France, where
reduced bad debt charges accounted for over 75% of the total
reduction; |
| |
| |
(iii) a decrease in telephone outbound interconnect costs,
which offset an increase in intercompany cost for broadband
Internet services under the revenue sharing agreement between
UPC Broadband and chellomedia; |
| |
| |
(iv) a decrease in programming costs resulting from a year
over year reduction in the DTH business, due to the closure of
an uplink facility, which was only partially offset by the
impact of subscriber growth. |
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR) |
Operating expenses for UGC Broadband — Chile increased
4.0% in 2003, as compared to 2002. Excluding the effects of
foreign exchange fluctuations, such increase was also 4.0%. This
increase is primarily due to increases in variable costs such as
domestic and international access charges, programming costs and
maintenance and technical service costs. Such increased costs
were largely driven by subscriber growth.
J-COM operating expenses increased 17.2% during 2003, as
compared to 2002. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange
fluctuations, such increases were 8.5%. The local currency
increase primarily is due to an increase in programming costs as
a result of video subscriber growth, and to an increase in
interconnection charges paid to third parties associated with an
increase in telephone revenue. Increases in network maintenance
and technical support costs associated with the expansion of
J-COM’s network also contributed to the increase.
II-18
SG&A Expenses of our Reportable Segments
|
|
|
SG&A expenses — Years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Increase | |
|
Increase (decrease) | |
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
(decrease) | |
|
excluding FX | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except % amounts | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
111,692 |
|
|
|
95,495 |
|
|
|
16,197 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
6,016 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
90,468 |
|
|
|
32,866 |
|
|
|
57,602 |
|
|
|
175.3 |
% |
|
|
54,257 |
|
|
|
165.1 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
51,249 |
|
|
|
43,427 |
|
|
|
7,822 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
3,344 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
141,833 |
|
|
|
99,197 |
|
|
|
42,636 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
% |
|
|
32,448 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe
|
|
|
395,242 |
|
|
|
270,985 |
|
|
|
124,257 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
% |
|
|
96,065 |
|
|
|
35.5 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
75,068 |
|
|
|
62,919 |
|
|
|
12,149 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
3,775 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
J-COM
|
|
|
412,624 |
|
|
|
375,263 |
|
|
|
37,361 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
6,009 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
227,906 |
|
|
|
193,581 |
|
|
|
34,325 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
10,238 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
Elimination of intercompany transactions
|
|
|
(10,372 |
) |
|
|
(9,632 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(412,624 |
) |
|
|
(852,779 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
687,844 |
|
|
|
40,337 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M. — Not Meaningful
SG&A expenses include human resources, information
technology, general services, management, finance, legal and
marketing costs and other general expenses.
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe |
SG&A expenses for UGC Broadband — Total Europe
increased 45.9% in 2004, as compared to 2003. SG&A expenses
for UGC Broadband — France and UGC
Broadband — Other Europe include $51,069,000 and
$25,707,000 incurred by Noos and Chorus, respectively, both of
which were acquired in 2004. Excluding the $76,776,000 increase
associated with the 2004 Noos and Chorus acquisitions and the
$28,192,000 increase due to exchange rate fluctuations, UGC
Broadband — Total Europe’s SG&A expenses
increased $19,289,000, or 7.1% in 2004, as compared to 2003,
primarily due to:
|
|
| |
(i) an increase in marketing expenditures to support
subscriber growth and new digital programming services; |
| |
| |
(ii) annual wage increases; and |
| |
| |
(iii) increased consulting and other information technology
support costs associated with the implementation of new customer
care systems in several countries and a subscriber management
system in Austria. |
These increases were partly offset by continuing cost control
across all aspects of the business and cost savings resulting
from UGC Broadband — The Netherlands’
restructuring that was implemented during the second quarter of
2004.
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR) |
UGC Broadband — Chile’s SG&A expenses
increased 19.3% during 2004, as compared to 2003. Excluding the
effects of foreign exchange fluctuations, such increase was
6.0%. The local currency increase primarily is due to
(i) an increase in commissions and marketing costs as a
result of subscriber growth and increased
II-19
competition, (ii) annual wage increases, and
(iii) higher legal, accounting and other professional
advisory fees due in part to requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
J-COM SG&A expenses increased 10% during 2004 as compared to
2003. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange fluctuations,
J-COM SG&A expenses increased 1.6% during 2004 as compared
to 2003. This local currency increase primarily is attributable
to the net effect of (i) increased labor and other overhead
costs associated primarily with increases in J-COM’s
subscribers, and (ii) reduced marketing personnel and
advertising and promotion expenses.
|
|
|
SG&A expenses — Years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 |
An analysis of the SG&A expenses of our reportable segments
for the indicated periods is set forth below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
excluding FX | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except % amounts | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
95,495 |
|
|
|
88,101 |
|
|
|
7,394 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
(9,691 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
)% |
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
32,866 |
|
|
|
30,767 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
(3,538 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
)% |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
43,427 |
|
|
|
32,678 |
|
|
|
10,749 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
99,197 |
|
|
|
92,582 |
|
|
|
6,615 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
(2,381 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe
|
|
|
270,985 |
|
|
|
244,128 |
|
|
|
26,857 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
(12,930 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
)% |
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
62,919 |
|
|
|
51,224 |
|
|
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
11,321 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
J-COM
|
|
|
375,263 |
|
|
|
352,762 |
|
|
|
22,501 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
(5,380 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
193,581 |
|
|
|
188,040 |
|
|
|
5,541 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
(19,513 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
)% |
|
Elimination of intercompany transactions
|
|
|
(9,632 |
) |
|
|
(11,933 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(852,779 |
) |
|
|
(781,952 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
40,337 |
|
|
|
42,269 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M. — Not Meaningful
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe |
SG&A expenses for UGC Broadband — Total Europe
increased 11.0% in 2003, as compared to 2002. Excluding the
$1,175,000 decrease associated with the third quarter 2002
deconsolidation of UGC’s broadband operations in Germany
and the $39,787,000 increase associated with exchange rate
fluctuations, UGC Broadband — Total Europe’s SG&A
expenses decreased $11,755,000 or 4.8% in 2003, as compared to
2002, primarily due to improved operational cost control
resulting from restructuring activities and other cost cutting
measures. These cost reductions were partially offset by an
increase in marketing expenditures to support subscriber growth.
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR) |
SG&A expenses for UGC Broadband — Chile increased
22.8% in 2003, as compared to 2002. Excluding the effects of
foreign exchange fluctuations, SG&A expenses increased
22.1%, primarily due to (i) an increase in commissions and
marketing costs as a result of subscriber growth and increased
competition, (ii) annual wage increases and
(iii) higher professional advisory fees.
J-COM SG&A expenses increased 6.4% during 2003, as compared
to 2002. Excluding the effects of foreign exchange fluctuations,
J-COM SG&A expenses decreased 1.5% during 2003 as compared
to 2002. This
II-20
decrease was attributable primarily to reduced costs for
marketing personnel and advertising and promotion expenses
associated with customer acquisitions, expense reductions
resulting from scale efficiencies and to continued management
focus on limiting expenses. The decrease was partially offset by
an increase in labor costs at J-COM’s call centers as a
result of the provision of customer support to a larger
subscriber base.
Operating Cash Flow of our Reportable Segments
Operating cash flow is the primary measure used by our chief
operating decision maker to evaluate segment operating
performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments.
As we use the term, operating cash flow is defined as revenue
less operating and SG&A expenses (excluding depreciation and
amortization, impairment of long-lived assets, restructuring and
other charges and stock-based compensation). We believe
operating cash flow is meaningful because it provides investors
a means to evaluate the operating performance of our segments
and our company on an ongoing basis using criteria that is used
by our internal decision makers. Our internal decision makers
believe operating cash flow is a meaningful measure and is
superior to other available GAAP measures because it represents
a transparent view of our recurring operating performance and
allows management to readily view operating trends, perform
analytical comparisons and benchmarking between segments in the
different countries in which we operate and identify strategies
to improve operating performance. For example, our internal
decision makers believe that the inclusion of impairment and
restructuring charges within operating cash flow distorts the
ability to efficiently assess and view the core operating trends
in our segments. In addition, our internal decision makers
believe our measure of operating cash flow is important because
analysts and investors use it to compare our performance to
other companies in our industry. For a reconciliation of total
consolidated operating cash flow to our consolidated pre-tax
earnings (loss), see note 20 to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements. Investors should view
operating cash flow as a supplement to, and not a substitute
for, operating income, net income, cash flow from operating
activities and other GAAP measures of income as a measure of
operating performance.
|
|
|
Operating Cash Flow — Years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
An analysis of the operating cash flow of our reportable
segments for the indicated periods is set forth below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
excluding FX | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except % amounts | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
361,265 |
|
|
|
267,075 |
|
|
|
94,190 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
63,021 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
53,690 |
|
|
|
13,920 |
|
|
|
39,770 |
|
|
|
285.7 |
% |
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
278.6 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
111,950 |
|
|
|
98,278 |
|
|
|
13,672 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
281,398 |
|
|
|
203,495 |
|
|
|
77,903 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
% |
|
|
57,526 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe
|
|
|
808,303 |
|
|
|
582,768 |
|
|
|
225,535 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
% |
|
|
163,563 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
108,752 |
|
|
|
69,951 |
|
|
|
38,801 |
|
|
|
55.5 |
% |
|
|
26,721 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
J-COM
|
|
|
589,597 |
|
|
|
428,318 |
|
|
|
161,279 |
|
|
|
37.7 |
% |
|
|
116,454 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
(28,907 |
) |
|
|
(6,090 |
) |
|
|
(22,817 |
) |
|
|
374.7 |
% |
|
|
(19,982 |
) |
|
|
328.1 |
% |
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(589,597 |
) |
|
|
(1,057,200 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
888,148 |
|
|
|
17,747 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M. — Not Meaningful
As set forth in the above table, our consolidated operating cash
flow for 2004 was $888,148,000. If exchange rates had remained
unchanged from 2003 levels, our operating cash flow would have
been $816,931,000 in 2004. For explanations of the factors
contributing to the changes in operating cash flow, see the
above analyses of the revenue, operating expenses and SG&A
expenses of our reportable segments.
II-21
|
|
|
Operating Cash Flow — Years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 |
An analysis of the operating cash flow of our reportable
segments for the indicated periods is set forth below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) | |
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
|
Increase (decrease) | |
|
excluding FX | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
|
$ | |
|
% | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except % amounts | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
267,075 |
|
|
|
119,329 |
|
|
|
147,746 |
|
|
|
123.8 |
% |
|
|
103,915 |
|
|
|
87.1 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
13,920 |
|
|
|
(10,446 |
) |
|
|
24,366 |
|
|
|
(233.3 |
)% |
|
|
22,013 |
|
|
|
(210.7 |
)% |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
98,278 |
|
|
|
64,662 |
|
|
|
33,616 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
% |
|
|
17,758 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
203,495 |
|
|
|
131,882 |
|
|
|
71,613 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
% |
|
|
43,165 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UGC Broadband — Total Europe
|
|
|
582,768 |
|
|
|
305,427 |
|
|
|
277,341 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
% |
|
|
186,851 |
|
|
|
61.2 |
% |
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
69,951 |
|
|
|
41,959 |
|
|
|
27,992 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
% |
|
|
27,268 |
|
|
|
65.0 |
% |
|
J-COM
|
|
|
428,318 |
|
|
|
211,146 |
|
|
|
217,172 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
% |
|
|
185,735 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
% |
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
(6,090 |
) |
|
|
(36,957 |
) |
|
|
30,867 |
|
|
|
(83.5 |
)% |
|
|
30,183 |
|
|
|
(81.7 |
)% |
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(1,057,200 |
) |
|
|
(507,520 |
) |
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
17,747 |
|
|
|
14,055 |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
|
|
N.M. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M. — Not Meaningful
For explanations of the factors contributing to the changes in
operating cash flow, see the above analyses of the revenue,
operating expenses and SG&A expenses of our reportable
segments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Prior to the spin off, cash transfers from Liberty represented
our primary source of funds. Due to the spin off, cash transfers
from Liberty no longer represent a source of liquidity for us.
Although our consolidated operating subsidiaries have generated
cash from operating activities and have borrowed funds under
their respective bank facilities, we generally are not entitled
to the resources of our operating subsidiaries or business
affiliates. In this regard, we and each of our operating
subsidiaries perform separate assessments of our respective
liquidity needs. Accordingly, the current and future liquidity
of our corporate and subsidiary operations is discussed
separately below. Following the discussion of our sources and
uses of liquidity, we present a discussion of our consolidated
cash flow statements.
At December 31, 2004, we and our non-operating subsidiaries
held unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $1,487,963,000.
Such cash and cash equivalents represent available liquidity at
the corporate level. Our remaining unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents at December 31, 2004 of $1,043,523,000 were
held by UGC and our other operating subsidiaries. As noted
above, we generally do not anticipate that any of the cash held
by our operating subsidiaries will be made available to us to
satisfy our corporate liquidity requirements. As described in
greater detail below, our current sources of liquidity include
(i) our cash and cash equivalents, (ii) our ability to
monetize certain investments and derivative instruments, and
(iii) interest and dividend income received on our cash and
cash equivalents and investments. From time to time, we may also
receive distributions or loan repayments from our subsidiaries
or affiliates and proceeds upon the disposition of investments
and other assets or upon the exercise of stock options.
During the 2004 period prior to the spin off, a subsidiary of
our company borrowed $116,666,000 from Liberty pursuant to
certain notes payable. In connection with the spin off, Liberty
also entered into a Short-Term Credit Facility with us. During
the third quarter of 2004, all amounts due to Liberty under the
notes payable were repaid with proceeds from the LMI Rights
Offering and the Short-Term Credit Facility was terminated.
II-22
In connection with the spin off, Liberty contributed to our
company cash and cash equivalents of $50,000,000 and
available-for-sale securities with a fair value of $561,130,000
on the contribution date. For additional information, see
note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
On July 19, 2004, our investment in Telewest Communications
plc Senior Notes and Senior Discount Notes was converted into
18,417,883 shares or approximately 7.5% of the issued and
outstanding common stock of Telewest. During the third and
fourth quarters of 2004, we sold all of the acquired Telewest
shares for aggregate cash proceeds of $215,708,000, resulting in
a pre-tax loss of $16,407,000.
On July 26, 2004, we commenced the LMI Rights Offering
whereby holders of record of LMI common stock on that date
received 0.20 transferable subscription rights for each share of
LMI common stock held. The LMI Rights Offering expired in
accordance with its terms on August 23, 2004. Pursuant to
the terms of the LMI Rights Offering, we issued 28,245,000
shares of LMI Series A common stock and 1,211,157 shares of
LMI Series B common stock in exchange for aggregate cash
proceeds of $739,432,000, before deducting related offering
costs of $3,771,000.
In October 2004, we sold our interest in the Sky Multi-Country
DTH platform in exchange for reimbursement by the purchaser of
$1,500,000 of funding provided by us in the previous few months
and the release from certain guarantees described below. We were
deemed to owe the purchaser $6 million in respect of such
platform, which amount was offset against a separate payment we
received from the purchaser as explained below. We also agreed
to sell our interest in the Sky Brasil DTH platform and granted
the purchaser an option to purchase our interest in the Sky
Mexico DTH platform. On October 28, 2004, we received
$54 million in cash from the purchaser, which consisted of
$60 million consideration payable for our Sky Brasil
interest less the $6 million we were deemed to owe the
purchaser in respect of the Sky Multi-Country DTH platform. The
$60 million is refundable by us if the Sky Brasil
transaction is terminated. It may be terminated by us or the
purchaser if it has not closed by October 8, 2007 or by the
purchaser if certain conditions are incapable of being
satisfied. We will receive $88 million in cash upon the
transfer of our Sky Mexico interest to the purchaser. The Sky
Mexico interest will not be transferred until certain Mexican
regulatory conditions are satisfied. If the purchaser does not
exercise its option to purchase our Sky Mexico interest on or
before October 8, 2006 (or in some cases an earlier date),
then we have the right to require the purchaser to purchase our
interest if certain conditions, including the absence of Mexican
regulatory prohibition of the transaction, have been satisfied
or waived. In connection with these transactions our guarantees
of the obligations of the Sky Multi-Country, Sky Brasil and Sky
Mexico platforms under certain transponder leases were
terminated and the purchaser agreed to obtain releases of our
guarantees of obligations under certain equipment leases no
later than December 31, 2004. All but one of such
guarantees have been released. The purchaser has agreed to
indemnify us for any amounts we are required to pay under our
remaining guarantee until such guarantee is terminated.
Cablevisión is currently seeking to restructure its debt
pursuant to an out of court reorganization agreement. That
agreement has been approved by the requisite majorities of
Cablevisión’s creditors, and a petition for its
approval has been filed by Cablevisión with a commercial
court in Buenos Aires under Argentina’s bankruptcy laws.
Pursuant to the reorganization agreement, we had the right and
obligation to contribute $27,500,000 to Cablevisión, for
which we would receive, after giving effect to a capital
reduction pertaining to the current shareholders of
Cablevisión (including the entity in which Liberty had a
78.2% economic interest), approximately 40.0% of the equity of
the restructured Cablevisión. In the fourth quarter of,
2004, we entered into an agreement that provided for the
transfer of this right and obligation in exchange for cash
consideration of approximately $40,527,000. We received 50% of
such cash consideration as a down payment in November 2004 and
we received the remainder in March 2005. We will recognize a
gain of $40,527,000 during the first quarter of 2005 in
connection with the closing of this transaction.
On December 21, 2004, we received cash proceeds of
¥43,809 million ($420,188,000 at December 21,
2004) in repayment of all principal and interest due to our
company from J-COM and another affiliate pursuant to then
outstanding shareholder loans.
II-23
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we sold 4,500,000 shares of
News Corp. Class A common stock for aggregate cash proceeds
of $83,669,000 ($29,770,000 of which was received in 2005),
resulting in a pre-tax gain of $37,174,000.
On December 23, 2004, Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico
completed the refinancing of its existing bank facility with a
new $140 million dollar facility consisting of a
$125 million six-year term loan facility and a
$15 million six-year revolving credit facility. In
connection with the closing of this facility, (i) Liberty
Cablevision Puerto Rico made a $63,500,000 cash distribution to
our company and (ii) the $50,542,000 cash collateral
(including interest) for Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico’s
previous bank facility was released to our company.
In addition to the above sources and potential sources of
liquidity, we may elect to monetize our investments in News
Corp., ABC Family preferred stock and/or certain other
investments and derivative instruments that we hold. In this
regard, we are a party to a variable forward sale transaction
with respect to 5,500,000 shares of News Corp. Class A
common stock that provided us with borrowing availability of
$86,460,000 at December 31, 2004. For additional
information concerning our investments and derivative contracts,
see notes 7 and 8 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
We believe that our current sources of liquidity are sufficient
to meet our known liquidity requirements through 2005, including
any cash consideration that we might pay in connection with the
closing of the proposed merger transaction with UGC, as
described below. However, in the event another major investment
or acquisition opportunity were to arise, it is likely that we
would be required to seek additional capital in order to
consummate any such transaction.
Our primary uses of cash have historically been investments in
affiliates and acquisitions of consolidated businesses. We
intend to continue expanding our collection of international
broadband and programming assets. Accordingly, our future cash
needs include making additional investments in and loans to
existing affiliates, funding new investment opportunities, and
funding our corporate general and administrative expenses.
On January 5, 2004, we completed a transaction pursuant to
which UGC’s founding shareholders transferred
8.2 million shares of UGC Class B common stock to our
company in exchange for 12.6 million shares of Liberty
Series A common stock valued, for accounting purposes, at
$152,122,000 and a cash payment of $12,857,000. We also incurred
$2,970,000 of acquisition costs in connection with this
transaction. This transaction was the last of a number of
independent transactions that occurred from 2001 through January
2004 pursuant to which we acquired our controlling interest in
UGC.
During 2004 we also purchased an additional 20 million
shares of UGC Class A common stock pursuant to certain
pre-emptive rights granted to our company by UGC. The
$152,284,000 purchase price for such shares was comprised of
(i) the cancellation of indebtedness due from subsidiaries
of UGC to certain of our subsidiaries in the amount of
$104,462,000 (including accrued interest) and (ii) $47,822,000
in cash. As UGC was one of our consolidated subsidiaries at the
time of these purchases, the effect of these purchases was
eliminated in consolidation.
Also, in January 2004, UGC initiated a rights offering pursuant
to which holders of each of UGC’s Class A,
Class B and Class C common stock received 0.28
transferable subscription rights to purchase a like class of
common stock for each share of UGC common stock owned by them on
January 21, 2004. The rights offering expired on
February 12, 2004. UGC received cash proceeds of
approximately $1.02 billion from the rights offering. As a
holder of UGC Class A, Class B and Class C common
stock, we participated in the rights offering and exercised our
rights to purchase 90.7 million shares for a total cash
purchase price of $544,250,000.
We hold a 50% interest in Metrópolis, a cable operator in
Chile. On January 23, 2004, we, Liberty and CristalChile
entered into an agreement pursuant to which each agreed to use
its respective commercially reasonable efforts to combine the
businesses of Metrópolis and VTR a wholly owned subsidiary
of UGC. If the proposed combination is consummated, UGC would
own 80% of the voting and equity rights in the combined entity,
and CristalChile would own the remaining 20%. We would also
receive a promissory note from the combined entity (the amount
of which is subject to negotiation), which would be unsecured
and subordinated
II-24
to third party debt. In addition, CristalChile would have a put
right which would allow CristalChile to require UGC to purchase
all, but not less than all, of its interest in the combined
entity at the fair value of the interest, subject to a minimum
price of $140 million. This put right will end on the tenth
anniversary of the combination. Liberty has agreed to perform
UGC’s obligations under CristalChile’s put if UGC does
not do so and, in connection with the spin off, we agreed to
indemnify Liberty against its obligations with respect to
CristalChile’s put right. If the merger does not occur, we
and CristalChile have agreed to fund our pro rata share of a
capital call sufficient to retire Metropolis’ local debt
facility, which had an outstanding principal amount of Chilean
pesos 30.2 billion ($54,399,000) at December 31, 2004.
The combination is subject to certain conditions, including the
execution of definitive agreements, Chilean regulatory approval,
the approval of the respective boards of directors of the
relevant parties (including, in the case of UGC, the independent
members of UGC’s board of directors) and the receipt of
necessary third party approvals and waivers. The Chilean
antitrust authorities approved the combination in October 2004
subject to certain conditions. The primary conditions require
that the combined entity (i) re-sell broadband capacity to
third party Internet service providers on a wholesale basis;
(ii) activate two-way capacity on all portions of the
combined network within five years; and (iii) limit basic
tier price increases to the rate of inflation plus a programming
cost escalator over the next three years. An action was filed
with the Chilean Supreme Court seeking to reverse such approval,
but the action was dismissed on March 10, 2005. We,
CristalChile and UGC are currently negotiating the terms of the
definitive agreements for the combination.
On May 20, 2004, we acquired all of the issued and
outstanding ordinary shares of PHL for
€2,447,000,
including
€447,000 of
acquisition costs ($2,918,000 at May 20, 2004). PHL,
through its subsidiary Chorus Communications Limited, owns and
operates broadband communications systems in Ireland. In
connection with this acquisition, we loaned an aggregate of
€75,000,000
($89,483,000 as of May 20, 2004) to PHL. The proceeds from
this loan were used by PHL to discharge liabilities pursuant to
a debt restructuring plan and to provide funds for capital
expenditures and working capital. In June 2004, LMI loaned PHL
an additional
€4,500,000
($6,137,000), for a total of
€79,500,000
($108,414,000) as of December 31, 2004. In addition to the
amounts loaned to PHL as of December 31, 2004, we have
committed to loan to PHL up to
€10,000,000
($13,637,000) at December 31, 2004. On December 16,
2004, UGC acquired our interest in PHL in exchange for 6,413,991
shares of UGC Class A common stock, valued for accounting
purposes at $58,303,000 on that date. In connection with
UGC’s acquisition of our interest in PHL, UGC committed to
refinance our loans to PHL no later than June 16, 2005. We
and UGC accounted for this transaction as a reorganization of
entities under common control at historical cost, similar to a
pooling of interests. For additional information, see
note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we entered into call option
contracts pursuant to which we contemporaneously (i) sold
call options on 1,210,000 shares of LMI Series A common
stock at exercise prices ranging from $39.5236 to $41.7536, and
(ii) purchased call options on 1,210,000 shares with an
exercise price of zero. As structured with the counterparty,
these instruments have similar financial mechanics to prepaid
put option contracts. Under the terms of the contracts, we can
elect cash or physical settlement. All of the contracts expired
during the first quarter of 2005 and were settled for cash. At
December 31, 2004, the $49,218,000 fair value of these call
option contracts is included in other current assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
On December 16, 2004, chellomedia Belgium acquired our
wholly owned subsidiary BCH for $121,068,000 in cash. BCH’s
only assets were debt securities of CPE and one of the InvestCos
and certain related contract rights. This purchase price was
equal to our cost basis in these debt securities, which included
an unrealized gain of $10,517,000. On December 17, 2004,
UGC entered into a restructuring transaction with CPE and
certain other parties. In this restructuring, BCH contributed
approximately $137,950,000 in cash and the debt security of the
InvestCo to Belgian Cable Investors in exchange for a 78.4%
common equity interest and 100% preferred equity interest in
Belgian Cable Investors. CPE owns the remaining 21.6% interest
in Belgian Cable Investors. Belgian Cable Investors distributed
approximately $115,592,000 in cash to CPE, which used the
proceeds to repurchase the debt securities of CPE held by BCH.
Belgian Cable Investors holds an indirect 14.1% interest in
Telenet and certain call options expiring in 2007 and 2009 to
acquire 3.36 million shares (11.6%) and 5.11 million
shares (17.6%), respectively, of the outstanding equity of
Telenet from existing
II-25
shareholders. Belgian Cable Investors’ indirect 14.1%
interest in Telenet results from its majority ownership of the
InvestCos, which hold in the aggregate 18.99% of the stock of
Telenet, and a shareholders agreement among Belgian Cable
Investors and three unaffiliated investors in the InvestCos that
governs the voting and disposition of 21.36% of the stock of
Telenet, including the stock held by the InvestCos.
During December 2004, we paid $127,890,000 to purchase 3,000,000
shares of LMI Series A common stock from Comcast
Corporation in a private transaction.
On January 17, 2005, we entered into an agreement and plan
of merger with UGC pursuant to which we each will merge with a
separate wholly owned subsidiary of a new parent company named
Liberty Global, which has been formed for this purpose. In the
mergers, each outstanding share of LMI Series A common
stock and LMI Series B common stock will be exchanged for
one share of the corresponding series of Liberty Global common
stock. UGC’s public stockholders may elect to receive for
each share of common stock owned either 0.2155 of a share of
Liberty Global Series A common stock (plus cash for any
fractional share interest) or $9.58 in cash. Cash elections will
be subject to proration so that the aggregate cash consideration
paid to UGC’s stockholders does not exceed 20% of the
aggregate value of the merger consideration payable to
UGC’s public stockholders. Completion of the transactions
is subject to, among other conditions, approval of both
companies’ stockholders, including an affirmative vote of a
majority of the voting power of UGC Class A common stock
not beneficially owned by our company, Liberty, any of our
respective subsidiaries or any of the executive officers or
directors of our company, Liberty, or UGC. Based on the number
of shares outstanding of LMI common stock and UGC common stock
at December 31, 2004, we estimate that UGC’s public
stockholders will receive (i) between approximately
63 million and 79 million shares of Liberty Global
Series A common stock and (ii) between nil and
approximately $700 million of cash consideration depending
on the extent to which UGC public shareholders elect to receive
cash consideration. We anticipate that we would fund any cash
consideration with existing cash balances.
As noted above, we will begin consolidating Super Media and
J-COM effective January 1, 2005. We do not expect the
consolidation of Super Media and J-COM to have a material impact
on our liquidity or capital resources as we expect that both our
company and J-COM will continue to separately assess and finance
our respective liquidity needs.
UGC. At December 31, 2004, UGC held cash and cash
equivalents of $1,028,993,000 and short-term liquid investments
of $48,965,000. In addition to its cash and cash equivalents and
its short-term liquid investments, UGC’s sources of
liquidity include borrowing availability under its existing
credit facilities and its operating cash flow.
UGC completed a rights offering in February 2004 and received
net cash proceeds of $1.02 billion. As a holder of UGC
Class A, Class B and Class C common stock, we
participated in the rights offering and exercised our rights to
purchase 90.7 million shares for a total cash purchase
price of $544,250,000.
On February 18, 2004, in connection with the consummation
of UPC Polska’s plan of reorganization and emergence from
its U.S. bankruptcy proceeding, third-party holders of UPC
Polska Notes and other claimholders received a total of
$87,361,000 in cash, $101,701,000 in new 9% UPC Polska Notes due
2007 and approximately 2,011,813 shares of UGC Class A
common stock in exchange for the cancellation of their claims.
UGC redeemed the new 9% UPC Polska Notes due 2007 for a cash
payment of $101,701,000 during the third quarter of 2004.
On April 6, 2004, UGC completed the offering and sale of
€500 million
UGC Convertible Notes. The UGC Convertible Notes are convertible
into shares of UGC Class A common stock at an initial
conversion price of
€9.7561 per
share, which was equivalent to a conversion price of $12.00 per
share and a conversion rate of 102.5 shares per
€1,000 principal
amount of the UGC Convertible Notes on the date of issue. For
additional information, see note 10 to the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
On December 17, 2004, VTR completed the refinancing of its
existing bank facility with the VTR Bank Facility, a new Chilean
peso-denominated six-year amortizing term senior secured credit
facility. The facility
II-26
consists of two tranches — a 54.7675 billion
Chilean peso ($95 million at December 17, 2004)
committed Tranche A and an uncommitted Tranche B. At
December 31, 2004, the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amount
outstanding under Tranche A of the VTR Bank Facility was
$97,941,000.
At December 31, 2004, UGC’s debt includes outstanding
euro denominated borrowings under four Facilities aggregating
€2,366,217,000
($3,226,810,000) and U.S. dollar denominated borrowings under
two Facilities aggregating $701,020,000 pursuant to the UPC
Broadband Bank Facility (as amended through December 31,
2004),
€500 million
($681,850,000) principal amount of UGC Convertible Notes,
$97,941,000 outstanding under the VTR Bank Facility, and certain
other borrowings. A fifth euro denominated Facility under the
UPC Broadband Bank Facility provided for aggregate availability
of
€667 million
($909 million) at December 31, 2004. The indenture
governing the UPC Broadband Bank Facility (i) provides for
a commitment fee of 0.5% of unused borrowing availability and
(ii) is secured by the assets of most of UPC’s
majority-owned European cable operating companies and is senior
to other long-term obligations of UPC. The indenture governing
the UPC Broadband Bank Facility also contains covenants that
limit among other things, UPC Broadband’s ability to merge
with or into another company, acquire other companies, incur
additional debt, dispose of any assets unless in the ordinary
course of business, enter or guarantee a loan, and enter into a
hedging arrangement. The indenture also restricts UPC Broadband
from transferring funds to its parent company (and directly to
UGC) through loans, advances or dividends. The weighted average
interest rate on borrowings under the UPC Broadband Bank
Facility was 6% for 2004.
On March 8, 2005, the UPC Broadband Bank Facility was
further amended to permit indebtedness under: (i) Facility
G, a new
€1.0 billion
term loan facility maturing in full on April 1, 2010;
(ii) Facility H, a new
€1.5 billion
($2.05 billion) term loan facility maturing in full on
September 1, 2012, of which $1.25 billion was
denominated in U.S. dollars and then swapped into euros through
a 7.5 year cross-currency swap; and (iii) Facility I,
a new
€500 million
($682 million) revolving credit facility maturing in full
on April 1, 2010. In connection with this amendment,
€167 million
($228 million) of Facility A, the existing revolving credit
facility, was cancelled, reducing Facility A to a maximum amount
of
€500 million
($682 million). The proceeds from Facilities G and H were
used primarily to prepay all amounts outstanding under existing
term loan Facilities B, C and E, to fund certain acquisitions
and pay transaction fees. The aggregate availability of
€1.0 billion
($1.36 billion) under Facilities A and I can be used to
fund acquisitions and for general corporate purposes. As a
result of this amendment, the weighted average maturity of the
UPC Broadband Bank Facility was extended from approximately
4 years to approximately 6 years, with no amortization
payments required until 2010, and the weighted average interest
margin on the UPC Broadband Bank Facility was reduced by
approximately 0.25% per annum. The amendment also provided for
additional flexibility on certain covenants and the funding of
acquisitions.
For additional information concerning UGC’s debt, see
note 10 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
On July 1, 2004, UPC Broadband France, an indirect
subsidiary of UGC and the owner of UGC’s French cable
television operations, acquired Noos, from Suez. Noos is a
provider of digital and analog cable television services and
high-speed Internet access services in France. UPC Broadband
France purchased Noos to achieve certain financial, operational
and strategic benefits through the integration of Noos with its
French operations and the creation of a platform for further
growth and innovation in Paris and its remaining French systems.
The preliminary purchase price was subject to a review of
certain historical financial information of Noos and UPC
Broadband France. In January 2005, UGC completed its purchase
price review with Suez, which resulted in a
€42,844,000
($52,128,000) reduction in the purchase price. The final
purchase price for Noos was approximately
€567,102,000
($689,989,000), consisting of
€487,085,000
($592,633,000) in cash and a 19.9% equity interest in UPC
Broadband France, valued at approximately
€71,339,000
($86,798,000). Acquisition costs totaled
€8,678,000
($10,558,000). For additional information, see note 5 to
the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
During the third quarter of 2004, UGC’s Board of Directors
authorized a $100 million share repurchase program. As of
December 31, 2004, UGC had repurchased 787,391 shares of
UGC Class A common stock under this program. Pursuant to
the Liberty Global merger agreement, UGC may not make further
purchases
II-27
of its Class A common stock until the mergers contemplated
thereby are completed or the merger agreement is terminated.
On January 12, 2004, Old UGC, a wholly owned subsidiary of
UGC that principally owns UGC’s interests in businesses in
Latin America and Australia, filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Old
UGC’s plan of reorganization, as amended, was confirmed by
the Bankruptcy Court on November 10, 2004, and the
restructuring of its indebtedness and other obligations pursuant
to the plan was completed on November 24, 2004. On
February 15, 2005, all of the Old UGC Senior Notes held by
third parties were redeemed in full for total cash consideration
of $25,068,000 plus accrued interest from August 15, 2004
through the redemption date totaling $1,324,000. For additional
information, see note 16 to the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
On January 17, 2005, chellomedia acquired an 87.5% interest
in Zone Vision from its current shareholders. Zone Vision is a
programming company that owns three pay television channels and
represents over 30 international channels. The consideration for
the transaction consisted of $50 million in cash and
1.6 million shares of UGC Class A common stock, which
are subject to a five-year vesting period. As part of the
transaction, chellomedia will contribute to Zone Vision the 49%
interest it already holds in Reality TV Ltd. and
chellomedia’s Club channel business.
During the first quarter of 2005, UGC made aggregate cash
payments of $49.3 million in connection with the settlement
of certain litigation. For additional information, see
note 22 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
Management of UGC believes that UGC will be able to meet its
current and long-term liquidity, acquisition and capital needs
through its existing cash, operating cash flow and available
borrowings under its existing credit facilities. However, to the
extent that UGC management plans to grow UGC’s business
through acquisitions, UGC management believes that UGC will need
additional sources of financing, most likely to come from the
capital markets in the form of debt or equity financing or a
combination of both.
Other Subsidiaries. Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico and
Pramer generally fund their own investing and financing
activities with cash from operations and bank borrowings, as
necessary. Due to covenants in their respective loan agreements,
we generally are not entitled to the cash resources or cash
generated by the operating activities of these two consolidated
subsidiaries. As noted above, Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico
completed the refinancing of its existing bank facility on
December 23, 2004. At December 31, 2004, Pramer’s
U.S. dollar denominated bank borrowings aggregated
$12,338,000. During 2002, following the devaluation of the
Argentine peso, Pramer failed to make certain required
payments due under its bank credit facility, resulting in a
technical default. However, the bank lenders did not provide
notice of default or request acceleration of the payments due
under the facility. On December 29, 2004, Pramer and the
banks signed definitive documents for the refinancing of this
credit facility (the New Pramer Facility) and the closing
occurred on January 28, 2005.
|
|
|
Consolidated Cash Flow Statements |
Our cash flows are subject to significant variations based on
foreign currency exchange rates. See related discussion under
“Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk” below. See also our “Discussion and
Analysis of Reportable Segments” above.
Due to the fact that we began consolidating UGC on
January 1, 2004, our cash flows for 2004 are not comparable
to the cash flows for 2003. Accordingly, the following
discussion focuses on our cash flows for 2004.
During 2004, we used net cash provided by our financing
activities of $2,240,388,000 and net cash provided by operating
activities of $746,240,000 to fund an increase in our cash and
cash equivalent balances of $2,451,977,000 (excluding a
$66,756,000 increase due to changes in foreign exchange rates)
and net cash used in our investing activities of $534,651,000.
II-28
During 2004, the net cash used by our investing activities was
$534,651,000. Such amount includes net cash paid for
acquisitions of $508,836,000, capital expenditures of
$508,347,000, investments in and loans to affiliates and others
of $256,959,000 and other less significant uses of cash. For
additional information concerning our acquisitions during 2004,
see note 5 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. UGC accounted for $480,133,000 of our consolidated
capital expenditures during 2004. In 2005, UGC management will
continue to focus on increasing penetration of services in its
existing upgraded footprint and the efficient deployment of
capital aimed at services that result in positive net cash
flows. UGC management expects its capital expenditures to be
significantly higher in 2005 than in 2004, primarily due to:
(i) costs for customer premise equipment as UGC management
expects to add more customers in 2005 than in 2004;
(ii) increased expenditures for new build and upgrade
projects to meet certain franchise commitments, increased
traffic, expansion of services and other competitive factors;
(iii) new initiatives such as UGC management’s plan to
invest more aggressively in digital television in certain
locations and UGC management’s planned VoIP rollout in
UGC’s major markets in Europe and Chile; and
(iv) other factors such as improvements to UGC’s
master telecom center in Europe, information technology upgrades
and expenditures for UGC’s general support systems.
The above-described uses of our cash for investing activities
were partially offset by proceeds received upon repayment of
principal amounts loaned to affiliates of $535,074,000 and
proceeds received upon dispositions of investments of
$315,792,000 and other less significant sources of cash. The
proceeds received upon repayment of affiliate loans primarily
represent the third and fourth quarter repayment of
yen-denominated loans to J-COM and another affiliate. The
proceeds received upon dispositions of investments relate
primarily to the sale of our Telewest and News Corp. securities.
During 2004, the cash provided by our financing activities was
$2,240,388,000. Such amount includes net proceeds of
$735,661,000 from the LMI Rights Offering, contributions
from Liberty of $704,250,000, net proceeds received on a
consolidated basis from the issuance of stock by subsidiaries of
$488,437,000, and net borrowings of debt of $451,830,000.
During 2003 and 2002, cash contributions from Liberty funded
most of our investments in and advances to our affiliates,
principally J-COM in 2003, and principally UGC and J-COM during
2002.
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates
The preparation of these financial statements required us to
make estimates and assumptions that affected the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting policies are defined as those policies that
are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, which
would potentially result in materially different results under
different assumptions and conditions. We believe our judgments
and related estimates associated with the carrying value of our
investments, the carrying value of our long-lived assets, the
valuation of our acquisition related assets and liabilities,
capitalization of our construction and installation costs and
our income tax accounting to be critical in the preparation of
our consolidated financial statements. These accounting
estimates or assumptions are critical because of the levels of
judgment necessary to account for matters that are inherently
uncertain or highly susceptible to change.
|
|
|
Carrying Value of Long-lived Assets |
The aggregate carrying value of our property and equipment,
intangible assets and goodwill (collectively, long-lived assets)
comprised 55% and 21% of our total assets at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively. Pursuant to Statements 142 and
144, we are required to assess the recoverability of our
long-lived assets.
Statement 144 requires that we periodically review the
carrying amounts of our property and equipment and our
intangible assets (other than goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible assets) to determine whether current events or
circumstances indicate that such carrying amounts may not be
recoverable. If the carrying amount of the asset is greater than
the expected undiscounted cash flows to be generated by such
asset, an impairment adjustment is to be recognized. Such
adjustment is measured by the amount that the carrying value of
such
II-29
assets exceeds their fair value. We generally measure fair value
by considering sale prices for similar assets or by discounting
estimated future cash flows using an appropriate discount rate.
For purposes of impairment testing, long-lived assets are
grouped at the lowest level for which cash flows are largely
independent of other assets and liabilities. Assets to be
disposed of are carried at the lower of their financial
statement carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.
Pursuant to Statement 142, we evaluate the goodwill and
franchise rights for impairment at least annually on October 1
and whenever other facts and circumstances indicate that the
carrying amounts of goodwill and franchise rights may not be
recoverable. For purposes of the goodwill evaluation, we compare
the fair value of each of our reporting units to their
respective carrying amounts. If the carrying value of a
reporting unit were to exceed its fair value, we would then
compare the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s
goodwill to its carrying amount, and any excess of the carrying
amount over the fair value would be charged to operations as an
impairment loss. Consistent with the provisions of Emerging
Issue Task Force Issue No. 02-7, Unit of Measure for
Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Assets, we evaluate
the recoverability of the carrying amount of our franchise
rights based on the same asset groupings used to evaluate our
long-lived assets because the franchise rights are inseparable
from the other assets in the asset group. Any excess of the
carrying value over the fair value for franchise rights is
charged to operations as an impairment loss.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate the
fair value of assets; accordingly, actual results could vary
significantly from such estimates.
In 2004, 2003 and 2002, we recorded impairments of our
long-lived assets aggregating $69,353,000, nil and
$45,928,000, respectively. For additional information, see
note 9 to the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
Carrying Value of Investments |
The aggregate carrying value of our available-for-sale, cost and
equity method investments comprised 20% and 59% of our total
assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We
account for these investments pursuant to Statement 115,
Statement 142 and Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 18. These accounting principles require us to
periodically evaluate our investments to determine if decreases
in fair value below our cost bases are other than temporary. If
a decline in fair value is determined to be
other-than-temporary, we are required to reflect such decline in
our statement of operations. Other-than-temporary declines in
fair value of cost investments are recognized on a separate line
in our consolidated statement of operations, and
other-than-temporary declines in fair value of equity method
investments are included in share of losses of affiliates in our
consolidated statement of operations.
The primary factors we consider in our determination are the
length of time that the fair value of the investment is below
our company’s carrying value and the financial condition,
operating performance and near term prospects of the investee.
In addition, we consider the reason for the decline in fair
value, be it general market conditions, industry specific or
investee specific; changes in stock price or valuation
subsequent to the balance sheet date; and our intent and ability
to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow
for a recovery in fair value. If the decline in fair value is
deemed to be other-than-temporary, the cost basis of the
security is written down to fair value. In situations where the
fair value of an investment is not evident due to a lack of a
public market price or other factors, we use our best estimates
and assumptions to arrive at the estimated fair value of such
investment. Our assessment of the foregoing factors involves a
high degree of judgment and accordingly, actual results may
differ materially from our estimates and judgments.
Our evaluation of the fair value of our investments and any
resulting impairment charges are determined as of the most
recent balance sheet date. Changes in fair value subsequent to
the balance sheet date due to the factors described above are
possible. Subsequent decreases in fair value will be recognized
in our consolidated statement of operations in the period in
which they occur to the extent such decreases are deemed to be
other-than-temporary. Subsequent increases in fair value will be
recognized in our consolidated statement of operations only upon
our ultimate disposition of the investment.
II-30
In 2004, 2003 and 2002, we recorded other-than-temporary
declines in the fair values of our (i) cost and
available-for-sale investments aggregating $18,542,000,
$6,884,000 and $247,386,000, respectively, and (ii) equity
method investments aggregating $25,973,000, $12,616,000, and
$72,030,000, respectively.
|
|
|
Fair Value of Acquisition Related Assets and Liabilities |
We allocate the purchase price of acquired companies or
acquisitions of minority interests of a subsidiary to the
identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on
their estimated fair values. In determining fair value,
management is required to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the recorded amounts. To assist in this process, third
party valuation specialists generally are engaged to value
certain of these assets and liabilities. Estimates used in
valuing acquired assets and liabilities include, but are not
limited to, expected future cash flows, market comparables and
appropriate discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair
value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but
which are inherently uncertain.
|
|
|
Capitalization of Construction and Installation Costs |
In accordance with SFAS No. 51, Financial Reporting
by Cable Television Companies, we capitalize costs
associated with the construction of new cable transmission and
distribution facilities and the installation of new cable
services. Capitalized construction and installation costs
include materials, labor and applicable overhead costs.
Installation activities that are capitalized include
(i) the initial connection (or drop) from our cable system
to a customer location, (ii) the replacement of a drop, and
(iii) the installation of equipment for additional
services, such as digital cable, telephone or broadband Internet
service. The costs of other customer-facing activities such as
reconnecting customer locations where a drop already exists,
disconnecting customer locations and repairing or maintaining
drops, are expensed. Significant judgment is involved in the
determination of the nature and amount of internal costs to be
capitalized with respect to construction and installation
activities.
We are required to estimate the amount of tax payable or
refundable for the current year and the deferred tax assets and
liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
income tax basis of assets and liabilities and the expected
benefits of utilizing net operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards, using enacted tax rates in effect for each taxing
jurisdiction in which we operate for the year in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
This process requires our management to make assessments
regarding the timing and probability of the ultimate tax impact
of such items. Net deferred tax assets are reduced by a
valuation allowance if we believe it more-likely-than-not such
net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Establishing a tax
valuation allowance requires us to make assessments about the
timing of future events, including the probability of expected
future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities.
Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to
future changes in income tax law in the jurisdictions in which
we operate, our inability to generate sufficient future taxable
income, differences between estimated and actual results, or
unpredicted results from the final determination of each
year’s liability by taxing authorities. Any of such factors
could have a material effect on our current and deferred tax
position as reported in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. A high degree of judgment is required to assess the
impact of possible future outcomes on our current and deferred
tax positions. For additional information, see note 11 to
the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual
Obligations |
|
|
|
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements |
At December 31, 2004, Liberty guaranteed
¥4,695 million ($45,842,000) of the bank debt of
J-COM. Liberty’s guarantees expire as the underlying debt
matures and is repaid. The debt maturity dates range from 2004
to 2019. In connection with the spin off, we have agreed to
indemnify Liberty for any amounts it is required to fund under
these arrangements.
II-31
Liberty Japan MC owns a 36.4% voting interest in Mediatti
Communications and an additional 0.87% interest that has limited
veto rights. Liberty Japan MC has the option until February 2006
to acquire from Mediatti up to 9,463 additional shares in
Mediatti at a price of ¥290,000 ($3,000) per share. If such
option is fully exercised, Liberty Japan MC’s interest in
Mediatti will be approximately 46%. The additional interest that
Liberty Japan MC has the right to acquire may initially be in
the form of non-voting Class A shares, but it is expected
that any Class A shares owned by Liberty Japan MC will be
converted to voting common stock.
The Mediatti shareholders who are party to the shareholders
agreement have granted to each other party whose ownership
interest is greater than 10%, a right of first refusal with
respect to transfers of their respective interests in Mediatti.
Each shareholder also has tag-along rights with respect to such
transfers. Olympus Mediacom has a put right that is first
exercisable during July 2008 to require Liberty Japan MC, LLC to
purchase all of its Mediatti shares at fair market value. If
Olympus exercises such right, the two minority shareholders who
are party to the shareholders agreement may also require Liberty
Japan MC to purchase their Mediatti shares at fair market value.
If Olympus Mediacom does not exercise such right, Liberty Japan
MC has a call right that is first exercisable during July 2009
to require Olympus Mediacom and the minority shareholders to
sell their Mediatti shares to Liberty Japan MC at fair market
value. If both the Olympus Mediacom put right and the Liberty
Japan MC call right expire without being exercised during the
first exercise period, either may thereafter exercise its put or
call right, as applicable, until October 2010.
Suez’ 19.9% interest in UPC Broadband France consists of
85,000,000 Class B Shares of UPC Broadband France. Subject
to the terms of a call option agreement, UPC France, UGC’s
indirect wholly owned subsidiary, has the right through
June 30, 2005 to purchase from Suez all of the Class B
Shares for
€85,000,000,
subject to adjustment, plus interest. The purchase price for the
Class B Shares may be paid in cash, UGC Class A common
stock or LMI Series A common stock. Subject to the terms of
a put option, Suez may require UPC France to purchase the
Class B Shares at specific times prior to or after the
third, fourth or fifth anniversaries of the purchase date. UPC
France will be required to pay the then fair value, payable in
cash, UGC common stock or LMI Series A common stock, for
the Class B Shares or assist Suez in obtaining an offer to
purchase the Class B Shares. UPC France also has the option
to purchase the Class B Shares from Suez shortly after the
third, fourth or fifth anniversaries of the purchase date at the
then fair value in cash, UGC Class A common stock or LMI
Series A common stock.
Pursuant to the agreement with CPE governing Belgian Cable
Investors, CPE has the right to require BCH to purchase all of
CPE’s interest in Belgian Cable Investors for the then
appraised fair market value of such interest during the first
30 days of every six-month period beginning in December
2007. BCH has the corresponding right to require CPE to sell all
of its interest in Belgian Cable Investors to BCH for appraised
fair value during the first 30 days of every six-month
period following December 2009.
In January 2005, chellomedia acquired an 87.5% interest in Zone
Vision from its current shareholders. Zone Vision’s
minority shareholders have the right to put 60% of their 12.5%
shareholding in Zone Vision to chellomedia on the third
anniversary of the completion of the acquisition, and 100% of
their shareholding on the fifth anniversary of the completion of
the acquisition. Chellomedia has corresponding call rights. The
price payable upon exercise of the put or call will be the then
fair market value of the shareholdings purchased.
In the ordinary course of business, we have provided
indemnifications to (i) purchasers of certain of our
assets, (ii) our lenders, (iii) our vendors and
(iv) other parties. In addition, we have provided
performance and/or financial guarantees to our franchise
authorities, customers and vendors. Historically, these
arrangements have not resulted in our company making any
material payments and we do not believe that they will result in
material payments in the future.
We have contingent liabilities related to legal and tax
proceedings and other matters arising in the ordinary course of
business. Although it is reasonably possible we may incur losses
upon conclusion of such matters, an estimate of any loss or
range of loss cannot be made. In the opinion of management, it
is expected that amounts, if any, which may be required to
satisfy such contingencies will not be material in relation to
the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
II-32
As of December 31, 2004, the U.S. dollar equivalent (based
on December 31, 2004 exchange rates) of our consolidated
contractual commitments are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Payments due during years ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2006-2007 | |
|
2008-2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Debt
|
|
$ |
29,518 |
|
|
|
1,308,328 |
|
|
|
2,112,967 |
|
|
|
1,509,094 |
|
|
|
4,959,907 |
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
2,585 |
|
|
|
5,995 |
|
|
|
7,166 |
|
|
|
32,608 |
|
|
|
48,354 |
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
1,533 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
10,526 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
36,827 |
|
|
|
1,316,468 |
|
|
|
2,121,666 |
|
|
|
1,543,826 |
|
|
|
5,018,787 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
$ |
101,440 |
|
|
|
142,630 |
|
|
|
94,811 |
|
|
|
124,092 |
|
|
|
462,973 |
|
|
Purchase obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Programming
|
|
|
95,911 |
|
|
|
34,181 |
|
|
|
8,838 |
|
|
|
17,086 |
|
|
|
156,016 |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
22,717 |
|
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
24,674 |
|
|
Other commitments
|
|
|
53,697 |
|
|
|
15,636 |
|
|
|
7,925 |
|
|
|
14,313 |
|
|
|
91,571 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual payments
|
|
$ |
310,592 |
|
|
|
1,510,872 |
|
|
|
2,233,240 |
|
|
|
1,699,317 |
|
|
|
5,754,021 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Programming commitments consist of obligations associated with
certain of our programming contracts that are enforceable and
legally binding on us inasmuch as we have agreed to pay minimum
fees, regardless of the actual number of subscribers or whether
we terminate cable service to a portion of our subscribers or
dispose of a portion of our cable systems.
Other purchase obligations consist of commitments to purchase
customer premise equipment that are enforceable and legally
binding on us. Other commitments consist of commitments to
rebuild or upgrade cable systems and to extend the cable network
to new developments, network maintenance, and other fixed
minimum contractual commitments associated with our agreements
with franchise or municipal authorities. The amount and timing
of the payments included in the table with respect to our
rebuild, upgrade and network extension commitments are estimated
based on the remaining capital required to bring the cable
distribution system into compliance with the requirements of the
applicable franchise agreement specifications.
In addition to the commitments set forth in the table above, we
have commitments under agreements with programming vendors,
franchise authorities and municipalities, and other third
parties pursuant to which we expect to make payments in future
periods. Such amounts are not included in the above table
because they are not fixed or determinable due to various
factors.
|
|
| Item 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK. |
We are exposed to market risk in the normal course of our
business operations due to our investments in various foreign
countries and ongoing investing and financial activities. Market
risk refers to the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in
foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and stock
prices. The risk of loss can be assessed from the perspective of
adverse changes in fair values, cash flows and future earnings.
We have established policies, procedures and internal processes
governing our management of market risks and the use of
financial instruments to manage our exposure to such risks.
We invest our cash in liquid instruments that meet high credit
quality standards and generally have maturities at the date of
purchase of less than three months. We are exposed to exchange
rate risk with respect to certain of our cash balances that are
denominated in the Japanese yen, euros and, to a lesser degree,
other currencies. At December 31, 2004, we held cash
balances of $417,488,000 that were denominated in the Japanese
yen and UGC held cash balances of $713,016,000 that were
denominated in euros. These Japanese yen and euro cash
II-33
balances are available to be used for future acquisitions and
other liquidity requirements that may be denominated in such
currencies.
We are also exposed to market price fluctuations related to our
investments in equity securities. At December 31, 2004, the
aggregate fair value of our equity method and available-for-sale
investments that was subject to price risk was $708,787,000.
We are exposed to unfavorable and potentially volatile
fluctuations of the U.S. dollar (our functional currency)
against the currencies of our operating subsidiaries and
affiliates. Any increase (decrease) in the value of the
U.S. dollar against any foreign currency that is the functional
currency of one of our operating subsidiaries or affiliates will
cause the parent company to experience unrealized foreign
currency translation losses (gains) with respect to amounts
already invested in such foreign currencies. In addition, we and
our operating subsidiaries and affiliates are exposed to foreign
currency risk to the extent that we enter into transactions
denominated in currencies other than our respective functional
currencies, such as investments in debt and equity securities of
foreign subsidiaries, equipment purchases, programming costs,
notes payable and notes receivable (including intercompany
amounts) that are denominated in a currency other than their own
functional currency. Changes in exchange rates with respect to
these items will result in unrealized (based upon period-end
exchange rates) or realized foreign currency transaction gains
and losses upon settlement of the transactions. In addition, we
are exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations related to our
operating subsidiaries’ monetary assets and liabilities and
the financial results of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates
when their respective financial statements are translated into
U.S. dollars for inclusion in our consolidated financial
statements. Cumulative translation adjustments are recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate
component of equity. As a result of foreign currency risk, we
may experience economic loss and a negative impact on earnings
and equity with respect to our holdings solely as a result of
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The primary
exposure to foreign currency risk for our company is to the euro
as over 50% of our U.S. dollar revenue is derived from countries
where the euro is the functional currency. In addition, we have
significant exposure to changes in the exchange rates for the
Japanese yen, Chilean peso and, to a lesser degree, other local
currencies in Europe.
We generally do not enter into derivative transactions that are
designed to reduce our long-term exposure to foreign currency
exchange risk. However, in order to reduce our foreign currency
exchange risk related to our cash balances that are denominated
in Japanese yen and our investment in J-COM, we have entered
into collar agreements with respect to ¥15 billion
($146,470,000). These collar agreements have a weighted average
remaining term of approximately
21/2
months, an average call price of ¥105/ U.S. dollar and an
average put price of ¥109/ U.S. dollar. In the past, we
have also entered into forward sales contracts with respect to
the Japanese yen. During 2004, we paid $17,001,000 to settle yen
forward sales and collar contracts.
The relationship between the euro, Japanese yen and Chilean peso
and the U.S. dollar, which is our reporting currency, is shown
below, per one U.S. dollar:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Spot rate | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Japanese | |
|
Chilean | |
| |
|
Euro | |
|
yen | |
|
peso | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
0.7333 |
|
|
|
102.41 |
|
|
|
559.19 |
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
0.7933 |
|
|
|
107.37 |
|
|
|
593.80 |
|
|
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
0.9545 |
|
|
|
118.76 |
|
|
|
718.61 |
|
II-34
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Average rate | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Japanese | |
|
Chilean | |
| |
|
Euro | |
|
yen | |
|
peso | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Year ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
0.8059 |
|
|
|
107.44 |
|
|
|
609.22 |
|
| |
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
0.8806 |
|
|
|
116.06 |
|
|
|
686.04 |
|
| |
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
1.0492 |
|
|
|
125.31 |
|
|
|
689.54 |
|
|
|
|
Inflation and Foreign Investment Risk |
Certain of our operating companies operate in countries where
the rate of inflation is higher than that in the United States.
While our affiliated companies attempt to increase their
subscription rates to offset increases in operating costs, there
is no assurance that they will be able to do so. Therefore,
operating costs may rise faster than associated revenue,
resulting in a material negative impact on reported earnings. We
are also impacted by inflationary increases in salaries, wages,
benefits and other administrative costs, the effects of which to
date have not been material. Our foreign operating companies are
all directly affected by their respective countries’
government, economic, fiscal and monetary policies and other
political factors.
We are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily as a
result of our borrowing and investment activities, which include
fixed and floating rate investments and borrowings by our
operating subsidiaries that are used to maintain liquidity and
fund their respective business operations. The nature and amount
of our long-term and short-term debt are expected to vary as a
result of future requirements, market conditions and other
factors. Our primary exposure to variable rate debt is through
the EURIBOR-indexed and LIBOR-indexed debt of UGC. UGC maintains
a mix of fixed and variable rate debt and enters into various
derivative transactions pursuant to UGC’s policies to
manage exposure to movements in interest rates. UGC monitors its
interest rate risk exposures using techniques including market
value and sensitivity analyses. UGC manages the credit risks
associated with its derivative financial instruments through the
evaluation and monitoring of the creditworthiness of the
counterparties. Although the counterparties may expose UGC to
losses in the event of nonperformance, UGC does not expect such
losses, if any, to be significant. UGC uses interest rate
exchange agreements to exchange, at specified intervals, the
difference between fixed and variable interest amounts
calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal
amount. UGC uses interest rate cap agreements that lock in a
maximum interest rate should variable rates rise, but which
enable it to otherwise pay lower market rates.
During the first quarter of 2003, UGC purchased interest rate
caps related to the UPC Broadband Bank Facility that capped the
variable EURIBOR interest rate at 3.0% on a notional amount of
€2.7 billion
for 2003 and 2004. As UGC was able to fix its variable interest
rates below 3.0% on the UPC Broadband Bank Facility during 2003
and 2004, all of these caps expired without being exercised.
During the first and second quarter of 2004, UGC purchased
interest rate caps for a total of $21,442,000, capping the
variable interest rate at 3.0% and 4.0% for 2005 and 2006,
respectively, on notional amounts totaling
€2.25 billion
to
€2.6 billion.
In June 2003, UGC entered into a cross currency and interest
rate swap pursuant to which a notional amount of
$347.5 million was swapped at an average rate of 1.133
euros per U.S. dollar until July 2005, with the variable LIBOR
interest rate (including margin) swapped into a fixed interest
rate of 7.85%. Following the prepayment of part of Facility C in
December 2004, UGC paid down this swap with a cash payment of
$59,100,000 and unwound a notional amount of $171,480,000. The
remainder of the swap is for a notional amount of $176,020,000,
and the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate has been reset at
1.3158 to 1. In connection with the refinancing of the UPC
Broadband Bank Facility in December 2004, UGC entered into a
seven-year cross currency and interest rate swap pursuant to
which a notional amount of $525 million was swapped at a
rate of 1.3342 euros per U.S. dollar until December 2011, with
the variable interest rate of LIBOR + 300 basis points swapped
into a variable rate of EURIBOR + 310 basis points for the same
time period.
II-35
During 2004, the weighted-average interest rate on variable rate
indebtedness of our consolidated subsidiaries was approximately
6%. If market interest rates had been higher by 50 basis points
during this period, our consolidated interest expense would have
increased by approximately $19 million during 2004.
At December 31, 2004, we were a party to total return debt
swaps in connection with (i) bank debt of a subsidiary of
UPC, and (ii) public debt of Cablevisión. Through
March 2, 2005, Liberty owned an indirect 78.2% economic and
non-voting interest in a limited liability company that owns 50%
of the outstanding capital stock of Cablevisión. Under the
total return debt swaps, a counterparty purchases a specified
amount of the underlying debt security for the benefit of our
company. We posted collateral with the counterparties equal to
30% of the counterparty’s purchase price for the purchased
indebtedness of the UPC subsidiary and 90% of the
counterparty’s purchase price for the purchased
indebtedness of Cablevisión. We record a derivative asset
equal to the posted collateral and such asset is included in
other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We
earn interest income based upon the face amount and stated
interest rate of the underlying debt securities, and pay
interest expense at market rates on the amount funded by the
counterparty. In the event the fair value of the underlying
purchased indebtedness of the UPC subsidiary declines by 10% or
more, we are required to post cash collateral for the decline,
and we record an unrealized loss on derivative instruments. The
cash collateral related to the UPC subsidiary indebtedness is
further adjusted up or down for subsequent changes in the fair
value of the underlying indebtedness or for foreign currency
exchange rate movements involving the euro and U.S. dollar.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we received cash proceeds of
$35,800,000 in connection with the termination of a portion of
the total return swap related to the debt of the UPC subsidiary.
At December 31, 2004, the aggregate purchase price of debt
securities underlying our total return debt swap arrangements
involving the indebtedness of the UPC subsidiary and
Cablevisión was $29,532,000. As of such date, we had posted
cash collateral equal to $19,868,000 ($2,930,000 with respect to
the UPC subsidiary and $16,938,000 with respect to
Cablevisión). If the fair value of the purchased debt
securities had been zero at December 31, 2004, we would
have been required to post additional cash collateral of
$8,972,000. During the first quarter of 2005, we received cash
proceeds of $22,264,000 upon termination of the Cablevisión
and UPC subsidiary total return swaps.
Prior to the spin off, Liberty contributed to our company
10,000,000 shares of News Corp. Class A common stock,
together with a related variable forward transaction. In
connection with the sale of 4,500,000 shares of News Corp.
Class A common stock during the fourth quarter of 2004, we
paid $3,429,000 to terminate the portion of the variable forward
transaction that related to the shares that were sold. After
giving effect to the fourth quarter termination transaction, the
forward, which expires on September 17, 2009, provides
(i) us with the right to effectively require the
counterparty to buy 5,500,000 News Corp. Class A common
stock at a price of $15.72 per share, or an aggregate price of
$86,460,000 (the Floor Price), and (ii) the counterparty
with the effective right to require us to sell 5,500,000 shares
of News Corp. Class A common stock at a price of $26.19 per
share. At any time during the term of the forward, we can
require the counterparty to advance the full Floor Price.
Provided we do not draw an aggregate amount in excess of the
present value of the Floor Price, as determined in accordance
with the forward, we may elect to draw such amounts on a
discounted or undiscounted basis. As long as the aggregate
advances are not in excess of the present value of the Floor
Price, undiscounted advances will bear interest at prevailing
three-month LIBOR and discounted advances will not bear
interest. Amounts advanced up to the present value of the Floor
Price are secured by the underlying shares of News Corp.
Class A common stock. If we elect to draw amounts in excess
of the present value of the Floor Price, those amounts will be
unsecured and will bear interest at a negotiated interest rate.
During the third quarter of 2004, we received undiscounted
advances aggregating $126 million under the forward. Such
advances were subsequently repaid during the quarter.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we entered into call option
contracts pursuant to which we contemporaneously (i) sold
call options on 1,210,000 shares of LMI Series A
common stock at exercise prices ranging from $39.5236 to
$41.7536, and (ii) purchased call options on
1,210,000 shares with an exercise price of zero. As
structured with the counterparty, these instruments have similar
financial mechanics to prepaid put option
II-36
contracts. Under the terms of the contracts, we can elect cash
or physical settlement. All of the contracts expired during the
first quarter of 2005 and were settled for cash.
In addition to the risks described above, we are also exposed to
the risk that our counterparties will default on their
obligations to us under the above-described derivative
instruments. Based on our assessment of the credit worthiness of
the counterparties, we do not anticipate any such default.
|
|
| Item 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. |
The consolidated financial statements of Liberty Media
International, Inc. are filed under this Item, beginning on
Page II-38. The financial statement schedules and the
separate financial statements of subsidiaries not consolidated
and 50 percent or less owned persons required by
Regulation S-X are filed under Item 15 of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
| Item 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. |
None.
|
|
| Item 9A. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
|
|
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including our chief executive
officer, principal accounting officer and principal financial
officer (the Executives), of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report. Based on that evaluation, the Executives concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
during the fourth quarter of 2004 to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules
and forms.
There has been no change in our internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2004 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
|
|
| Item 9B. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
Not applicable.
II-37
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Liberty Media International, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Liberty Media International, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and
subsidiaries (as more fully described in Note 1) as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive earnings (loss),
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Liberty Media International, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 11, 2005
II-38
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
ASSETS |
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2,531,486 |
|
|
|
12,753 |
|
| |
Trade receivables, net
|
|
|
201,519 |
|
|
|
14,162 |
|
| |
Other receivables, net
|
|
|
165,631 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
| |
Other current assets
|
|
|
293,947 |
|
|
|
16,453 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
3,192,583 |
|
|
|
44,336 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliates, accounted for using the equity
method, and related receivables (note 6)
|
|
|
1,865,642 |
|
|
|
1,740,552 |
|
| |
|
Other investments (note 7)
|
|
|
838,608 |
|
|
|
450,134 |
|
| |
|
Property and equipment, net (note 9)
|
|
|
4,303,099 |
|
|
|
97,577 |
|
| |
|
Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Goodwill (note 9)
|
|
|
2,667,279 |
|
|
|
525,576 |
|
| |
Franchise rights and other
|
|
|
230,674 |
|
|
|
163,450 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2,897,953 |
|
|
|
689,026 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization, net (note 9)
|
|
|
382,599 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
| |
|
Deferred tax assets (note 11)
|
|
|
77,313 |
|
|
|
583,945 |
|
| |
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
144,566 |
|
|
|
76,963 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
13,702,363 |
|
|
|
3,687,037 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-39
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS — (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
363,549 |
|
|
|
20,629 |
|
| |
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
526,382 |
|
|
|
12,556 |
|
| |
Subscriber advance payments and deposits
|
|
|
353,069 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
| |
Accrued interest
|
|
|
89,612 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
| |
Current portion of accrued stock-based compensation (notes 3 and
13)
|
|
|
37,017 |
|
|
|
15,052 |
|
| |
Derivative instruments (note 8)
|
|
|
14,636 |
|
|
|
21,010 |
|
| |
Current portion of debt (note 10)
|
|
|
36,827 |
|
|
|
12,426 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,421,092 |
|
|
|
82,932 |
|
| |
|
Long-term debt (note 10)
|
|
|
4,981,960 |
|
|
|
41,700 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities (note 11)
|
|
|
458,138 |
|
|
|
135,811 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
409,998 |
|
|
|
7,948 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,271,188 |
|
|
|
268,391 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Minority interests in subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,204,369 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Series A common stock, $.01 par value. Authorized
500,000,000 shares; issued 168,514,962 and nil shares at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Series B common stock, $.01 par value. Authorized
50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 7,264,300 and nil
shares at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Series C common stock, $.01 par value. Authorized
500,000,000 shares; no shares issued at December 31, 2004
or 2003
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
7,001,635 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,662,707 |
) |
|
|
(1,630,949 |
) |
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of taxes
(note 18)
|
|
|
14,010 |
|
|
|
(46,566 |
) |
| |
Treasury stock, at cost (note 12)
|
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
Parent’s investment
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,096,083 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
5,226,806 |
|
|
|
3,418,568 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
13,702,363 |
|
|
|
3,687,037 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
II-40
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except per share amounts | |
|
Revenue (note 14)
|
|
$ |
2,644,284 |
|
|
|
108,390 |
|
|
|
100,255 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating (other than depreciation) (note 14)
|
|
|
1,068,292 |
|
|
|
50,306 |
|
|
|
43,931 |
|
| |
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) (note 14)
|
|
|
687,844 |
|
|
|
40,337 |
|
|
|
42,269 |
|
| |
Stock-based compensation charges (credits) — primarily
SG&A (notes 3 and 13)
|
|
|
142,762 |
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
(5,815 |
) |
| |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
960,888 |
|
|
|
15,114 |
|
|
|
13,087 |
|
| |
Impairment of long-lived assets (note 9)
|
|
|
69,353 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
45,928 |
|
| |
Restructuring and other charges (note 17)
|
|
|
29,018 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2,958,157 |
|
|
|
109,845 |
|
|
|
139,400 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(313,873 |
) |
|
|
(1,455 |
) |
|
|
(39,145 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest expense (note 14)
|
|
|
(288,532 |
) |
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
|
|
(3,943 |
) |
| |
Interest and dividend income (note 14)
|
|
|
65,607 |
|
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
25,883 |
|
| |
Share of earnings (losses) of affiliates, net (note 6)
|
|
|
38,710 |
|
|
|
13,739 |
|
|
|
(331,225 |
) |
| |
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative
instruments, net (note 8)
|
|
|
(54,947 |
) |
|
|
12,762 |
|
|
|
(16,705 |
) |
| |
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses), net
|
|
|
92,305 |
|
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
(8,267 |
) |
| |
Gains on exchanges of investment securities (notes 6 and 7)
|
|
|
178,818 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
122,618 |
|
| |
Other-than-temporary declines in fair values of investments
(note 7)
|
|
|
(18,542 |
) |
|
|
(6,884 |
) |
|
|
(247,386 |
) |
| |
Gains on extinguishment of debt (note 10)
|
|
|
35,787 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Gains (losses) on disposition of investments, net (notes 6
and 7)
|
|
|
43,714 |
|
|
|
(4,033 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
| |
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(7,931 |
) |
|
|
6,651 |
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
84,989 |
|
|
|
50,343 |
|
|
|
(456,836 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
(228,884 |
) |
|
|
48,888 |
|
|
|
(495,981 |
) |
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
|
|
(27,975 |
) |
|
|
166,121 |
|
|
Minority interests in losses (earnings) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
179,677 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting
change
|
|
|
(31,758 |
) |
|
|
20,889 |
|
|
|
(329,887 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes
(note 3)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(238,267 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
(31,758 |
) |
|
|
20,889 |
|
|
|
(568,154 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings (loss) per common share (note 3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
II-41
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS (LOSS)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
(31,758 |
) |
|
|
20,889 |
|
|
|
(568,154 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of taxes (note 18):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
165,315 |
|
|
|
102,321 |
|
|
|
(173,715 |
) |
| |
Reclassification adjustment for foreign currency translation
gains included in net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(36,174 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
111,594 |
|
|
|
(39,526 |
) |
| |
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses on
available-for-sale securities included in net earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(120,842 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
86,175 |
|
| |
Effect of change in estimated blended state income tax rate
(note 11)
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)
|
|
|
9,594 |
|
|
|
213,888 |
|
|
|
(127,066 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
(22,164 |
) |
|
|
234,777 |
|
|
|
(695,220 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
II-42
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Common stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
comprehensive | |
|
Treasury | |
|
|
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
paid-in | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
earnings (loss), | |
|
stock, at | |
|
Parent’s | |
|
stockholders’ | |
| |
|
Series A | |
|
Series B | |
|
Series C | |
|
capital | |
|
deficit | |
|
net of taxes | |
|
cost | |
|
investment | |
|
equity | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Balance at January 1, 2002
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,083,684 |
) |
|
|
(133,388 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,256,665 |
|
|
|
2,039,593 |
|
| |
Net loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(568,154 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(568,154 |
) |
| |
Other comprehensive loss (note 18)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(127,066 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(127,066 |
) |
| |
Reallocation of enterprise-level goodwill from parent
(note 3)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
118,000 |
|
|
|
118,000 |
|
| |
Intercompany tax allocation (note 11)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
| |
Allocation of corporate overhead (note 14)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,794 |
|
|
|
10,794 |
|
| |
Net cash transfers from parent
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,231,738 |
|
|
|
1,231,738 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,651,838 |
) |
|
|
(260,454 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,621,185 |
|
|
|
2,708,893 |
|
| |
Net earnings
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,889 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,889 |
|
| |
Other comprehensive earnings (note 18)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
213,888 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
213,888 |
|
| |
Intercompany tax allocation (note 11)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(14,774 |
) |
|
|
(14,774 |
) |
| |
Allocation of corporate overhead (note 14)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,873 |
|
|
|
10,873 |
|
| |
Net cash transfers from parent
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
478,799 |
|
|
|
478,799 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,630,949 |
) |
|
|
(46,566 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,096,083 |
|
|
|
3,418,568 |
|
| |
Net loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(31,758 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(31,758 |
) |
| |
Other comprehensive earnings (note 18)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,594 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,594 |
|
| |
Intercompany tax allocation (note 11)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,133 |
|
|
|
6,133 |
|
| |
Allocation of corporate overhead (note 14)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,357 |
|
|
|
9,357 |
|
| |
Issuance of Liberty Media Corporation common stock in
acquisition (note 5)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
152,122 |
|
|
|
152,122 |
|
| |
Contribution of cash, investments and other net liabilities in
connection with spin off (note 2)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50,982 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
304,578 |
|
|
|
355,560 |
|
| |
Assumption by Liberty Media Corporation of obligation for stock
appreciation rights in connection with spin off (note 2)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,763 |
|
|
|
5,763 |
|
| |
Adjustment due to issuance of stock by subsidiaries and
affiliates and other changes in subsidiary equity, net of taxes
(note 12)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,049 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
7,074 |
|
| |
Net cash transfers from parent
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
654,250 |
|
|
|
654,250 |
|
| |
Change in capitalization in connection with spin off
(note 2)
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,227,851 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6,229,311 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
Common stock issued in rights offering (note 2)
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
735,366 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
735,661 |
|
| |
Stock issued for stock option exercises (note 13)
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,987 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,990 |
|
| |
Repurchase of common stock (note 12)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
| |
Stock-based compensation (notes 3 and 13)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,382 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,382 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
1,685 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,001,635 |
|
|
|
(1,662,707 |
) |
|
|
14,010 |
|
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,226,806 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
II-43
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
(31,758 |
) |
|
|
20,889 |
|
|
|
(568,154 |
) |
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Stock-based compensation charges (credits)
|
|
|
142,762 |
|
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
(5,815 |
) |
| |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
238,267 |
|
| |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
960,888 |
|
|
|
15,114 |
|
|
|
13,087 |
|
| |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
69,353 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
45,928 |
|
| |
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
29,018 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
21,735 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
| |
|
Share of losses (earnings) of affiliates, net
|
|
|
(38,710 |
) |
|
|
(13,739 |
) |
|
|
331,225 |
|
| |
|
Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
54,947 |
|
|
|
(12,762 |
) |
|
|
16,705 |
|
| |
|
Foreign currency transaction losses (gains), net
|
|
|
(92,305 |
) |
|
|
(5,412 |
) |
|
|
8,267 |
|
| |
|
Gain on exchanges of investment securities
|
|
|
(178,818 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(122,618 |
) |
| |
|
Other-than-temporary declines in fair values of investments
|
|
|
18,542 |
|
|
|
6,884 |
|
|
|
247,386 |
|
| |
|
Gains on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(35,787 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
Losses (gains) on disposition of investments, net
|
|
|
(43,714 |
) |
|
|
(3,759 |
) |
|
|
287 |
|
| |
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(84,149 |
) |
|
|
42,278 |
|
|
|
(169,606 |
) |
| |
|
Minority interests in (losses) earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(179,677 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
| |
|
Non-cash charges (credits) from Liberty Media Corporation
|
|
|
15,490 |
|
|
|
(3,901 |
) |
|
|
14,782 |
|
| |
|
Other noncash items
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(7,069 |
) |
| |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effects
of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Receivables, prepaids and other
|
|
|
(50,358 |
) |
|
|
9,653 |
|
|
|
12,064 |
|
| |
|
|
Payables and accruals
|
|
|
168,781 |
|
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
(28,165 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
746,240 |
|
|
|
55,996 |
|
|
|
26,732 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-44
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC
(See note 1)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS — (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
$ |
(508,836 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Cash paid for acquisition to be refunded by seller
|
|
|
(52,128 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Investments in and loans to affiliates and others
|
|
|
(256,959 |
) |
|
|
(494,193 |
) |
|
|
(1,204,242 |
) |
| |
Proceeds received upon repayment of principal amounts loaned to
affiliates
|
|
|
535,074 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Proceeds received upon repayment of debt securities
|
|
|
115,592 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Purchases of short-term liquid investments
|
|
|
(293,734 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Proceeds received from sale of short-term liquid investments
|
|
|
246,981 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Capital expended for property and equipment
|
|
|
(508,347 |
) |
|
|
(22,869 |
) |
|
|
(24,910 |
) |
| |
Net cash received (paid) to purchase or settle derivative
instruments
|
|
|
(158,949 |
) |
|
|
19,580 |
|
|
|
(15,346 |
) |
| |
Proceeds received upon dispositions of investments
|
|
|
315,792 |
|
|
|
8,230 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Deposits received in connection with pending asset sales
|
|
|
80,264 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
(27,298 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Other investing activities, net
|
|
|
(22,103 |
) |
|
|
(16,042 |
) |
|
|
1,940 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(534,651 |
) |
|
|
(505,294 |
) |
|
|
(1,242,558 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Borrowings of debt
|
|
|
2,301,211 |
|
|
|
41,700 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Repayments of debt
|
|
|
(1,849,381 |
) |
|
|
(22,954 |
) |
|
|
(12,784 |
) |
| |
Net proceeds received from rights offering
|
|
|
735,661 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Proceeds from issuance of stock by subsidiaries
|
|
|
488,437 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Change in cash collateral
|
|
|
41,700 |
|
|
|
(41,700 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
Contributions from Liberty Media Corporation
|
|
|
704,250 |
|
|
|
478,799 |
|
|
|
1,231,738 |
|
| |
Treasury stock purchase
|
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(65,951 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Other financing activities, net
|
|
|
12,351 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
2,240,388 |
|
|
|
455,845 |
|
|
|
1,218,954 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash
|
|
|
66,756 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
(2,238 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,518,733 |
|
|
|
7,161 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
| |
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
12,753 |
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
4,702 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
End of period
|
|
$ |
2,531,486 |
|
|
|
12,753 |
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
280,815 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
18,603 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net cash paid for taxes
|
|
$ |
4,264 |
|
|
|
4,651 |
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
II-45
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
| (1) |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Liberty
Media International, Inc. (LMI) include the historical
financial information of (i) certain international cable
television and programming subsidiaries and assets of Liberty
Media Corporation (Liberty), which we collectively refer to as
LMC International, for periods prior to the June 7, 2004
consummation of the spin off transaction described in
note 2 and (ii) LMI and its consolidated subsidiaries
for the period following such date. Upon consummation of the
spin off, LMI became the owner of the assets that comprise LMC
International. In the following text, “we,”
“our,” “our company” and “us” may
refer, as the context requires, to LMC International (prior to
June 7, 2004), LMI and its consolidated subsidiaries (on
and subsequent to June 7, 2004) or both.
Our operating subsidiaries and our most significant equity
method investments are set forth below.
Operating
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
| |
|
UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (UGC)
Liberty Cablevision of Puerto Rico Ltd. (Liberty Cablevision
Puerto Rico)
Pramer S.C.A. (Pramer) |
UGC. Our most significant subsidiary is UGC, an
international broadband communications provider of video, voice,
and Internet access services with operations in 13 European
countries and three Latin American countries. UGC’s largest
operating segments are located in The Netherlands, France,
Austria and Chile. At December 31, 2004, we owned
approximately 423.8 million shares of UGC common stock,
representing an approximate 53.6% economic interest and a 91.0%
voting interest. As further described in note 5, we began
consolidating UGC on January 1, 2004. Prior to that date,
we used the equity method to account for our investment in UGC.
On January 17, 2005, we entered into an agreement and plan
of merger with UGC pursuant to which we each will merge with a
separate wholly owned subsidiary of a new parent company named
Liberty Global, Inc. (Liberty Global), which has been formed for
this purpose. In the mergers, each outstanding share of LMI
Series A common stock and LMI Series B common stock
will be exchanged for one share of the corresponding series of
Liberty Global common stock. UGC’s public stockholders may
elect to receive for each share of common stock owned either
0.2155 of a share of Liberty Global Series A common stock
(plus cash for any fractional share interest) or $9.58 in cash.
Cash elections will be subject to proration so that the
aggregate cash consideration paid to UGC’s stockholders
does not exceed 20% of the aggregate value of the merger
consideration payable to UGC’s public stockholders.
Completion of the transactions is subject to, among other
conditions, approval of both companies’ stockholders,
including an affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power
of UGC Class A common stock not beneficially owned by our
company, Liberty, any of our respective subsidiaries or any of
the executive officers or directors of our company, Liberty, or
UGC.
The proposed merger will be accounted for as a “step
acquisition” by our company of the remaining minority
interest in UGC. The purchase price in this step acquisition
will include the consideration issued to UGC public stockholders
to acquire the UGC interest not already owned by our company and
the direct acquisition costs incurred by our company. As UGC was
our consolidated subsidiary prior to the proposed mergers, the
purchase price will first be applied to eliminate the minority
interest in UGC from our consolidated balance sheet, and the
remaining purchase price will be allocated on a pro rata basis
to the identifiable assets and liabilities of UGC based upon
their respective fair values at the effective date of the
proposed merger and the 46.4% interest in UGC to be acquired by
Liberty Global pursuant to the proposed mergers. Any excess
purchase price that remains after amounts have been allocated to
the net identifiable assets of UGC will be recorded as goodwill.
As the acquiring company for accounting purposes, our company
will be the predecessor
II-46
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
to Liberty Global and our historical financial statements will
become the historical financial statements of Liberty Global.
Other. Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico is a wholly-owned
subsidiary that owns and operates cable television systems in
Puerto Rico. Pramer is a wholly-owned Argentine programming
company that supplies programming services to cable television
and direct-to-home (DTH) satellite distributors in Latin
America and Spain.
|
|
|
Significant equity method investments at
December 31, 2004: |
LMI/ Sumisho Super Media LLC (Super Media)
Jupiter Programming Co., Ltd. (JPC)
On December 28, 2004, our 45.45% ownership interest in
Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd. (J-COM), and a 19.78%
interest in J-COM owned by Sumitomo Corporation were combined in
Super Media. As a result of these transactions, we held a 69.68%
noncontrolling interest in Super Media, and Super Media held an
approximate 65.23% controlling interest in J-COM at
December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004, we accounted
for our 69.68% interest in Super Media using the equity method.
As a result of a change in the corporate governance of Super
Media that occurred on February 18, 2005, we will begin
accounting for Super Media as a consolidated subsidiary
effective January 1, 2005. J-COM owns and operates
broadband businesses in Japan.
JPC is a joint venture between Sumitomo and our company that
primarily develops, manages and distributes pay television
services in Japan on a platform-neutral basis through various
distribution infrastructures, principally cable and DTH service
providers.
For additional information concerning our equity affiliates, see
note 6.
|
|
| (2) |
Spin Off Transaction and Rights Offering |
Spin
Off Transaction
On June 7, 2004 (the Spin Off Date), our common stock was
distributed on a pro rata basis to Liberty’s shareholders
as a dividend in connection with a spin off transaction. In
connection with the spin off, holders of Liberty common stock on
June 1, 2004 (the Record Date) received in the aggregate
139,921,145 shares of LMI Series A common stock for their
shares of Liberty Series A common stock owned on the Record
Date and 6,053,173 shares of LMI Series B common stock for
their shares of Liberty Series B common stock owned on the
Record Date. The number of shares of LMI common stock
distributed in the spin off was based on a ratio of .05 of a
share of LMI common stock for each share of Liberty common
stock. The spin off was intended to qualify as a tax-free spin
off.
In addition to the contributed subsidiaries and net assets that
comprise our company, Liberty also contributed certain other
assets and liabilities to our company in connection with the
spin off, as set forth in the following table (amounts in
thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
561,130 |
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(253,163 |
) |
|
Other net liabilities
|
|
|
(2,407 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
355,560 |
|
| |
|
|
|
II-47
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
The contributed available-for-sale securities included 5,000,000
American Depositary Shares (ADSs) for preferred limited voting
ordinary shares of The News Corporation Limited (News Corp.) and
a 99.9% economic interest in 345,000 shares of ABC Family
Worldwide, Inc. (ABC Family) Series A preferred stock.
Liberty also contributed a variable forward transaction with
respect to the News Corp. ADSs. During the fourth quarter of
2004, the 5,000,000 News Corp. ADSs were converted into
10,000,000 shares of News Corp.’s Class A
non-voting common stock (News Corp. Class A common stock)
pursuant to News Corp.’s reincorporation from Australia to
the United States. All of the following references to News Corp.
shares herein give effect to such conversion. For financial
reporting purposes, the contribution of the cash,
available-for-sale securities, related deferred tax liability
and other net liabilities is deemed to have occurred on
June 1, 2004.
All of the net assets contributed to our company by Liberty in
connection with the spin off have been recorded at
Liberty’s historical cost.
As a result of the spin off, we operate independently from
Liberty, and neither we nor Liberty have any stock ownership,
beneficial or otherwise, in the other. In connection with the
spin off, we and Liberty entered into certain agreements in
order to govern certain of the ongoing relationships between
Liberty and our company after the spin off and to provide for an
orderly transition. These agreements include a Reorganization
Agreement, a Facilities and Services Agreement and a Tax Sharing
Agreement. In addition, Liberty and our company entered into a
Short-Term Credit Facility that has since been terminated.
The Reorganization Agreement provides for, among other things,
the principal corporate transactions required to effect the spin
off, the issuance of LMI stock options upon adjustment of
certain Liberty stock incentive awards and the allocation of
responsibility for LMI and Liberty stock incentive awards, cross
indemnities and other matters. Such cross indemnities are
designed to make (i) our company responsible for all
liabilities related to the businesses of our company prior to
the spin off, as well as for all liabilities incurred by our
company following the spin off, and (ii) Liberty
responsible for all of our potential liabilities that are not
related to our businesses, including, for example, liabilities
arising as a result of our company having been a subsidiary of
Liberty.
The Facilities and Services Agreement and the Short-Term Credit
Facility, are described in note 14, and the Tax Sharing
Agreement is described in note 11.
Rights
Offering
On July 26, 2004, we commenced a rights offering (the LMI
Rights Offering) whereby holders of record of LMI common stock
on that date received 0.20 transferable subscription rights for
each share of LMI common stock held. Each whole right to
purchase LMI Series A common stock entitled the holder to
purchase one share of LMI Series A common stock at a
subscription price of $25.00 per share. Each whole right to
purchase LMI Series B common stock entitled the holder to
purchase one share of LMI Series B common stock at a
subscription price of $27.50 per share. Each whole Series A
and Series B right entitled the holder to subscribe, at the
same applicable subscription price pursuant to an
oversubscription privilege, for additional shares of the
applicable series of LMI common stock, subject to proration. The
LMI Rights Offering expired in accordance with its terms on
August 23, 2004. Pursuant to the terms of the LMI Rights
Offering, we issued 28,245,000 shares of LMI Series A
common stock and 1,211,157 shares of LMI Series B
common stock in exchange for aggregate cash proceeds of
$739,432,000, before deducting related offering costs of
$3,771,000.
As a result of the LMI Rights Offering, the exercise price
for LMI stock options outstanding at the time of the
LMI Rights Offering was reduced by multiplying the exercise
price by 94%, and the number of options outstanding was
increased by dividing the number of the then outstanding
LMI stock options by 94%. Unless
II-48
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
otherwise noted, all references herein to the number of
outstanding LMI stock options and the related exercise
prices reflect these modified terms.
(3) Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates and
assumptions are used in accounting for, among other things, the
valuation of acquisition-related assets and liabilities,
allowances for uncollectible accounts, deferred income taxes and
related valuation allowances, loss contingencies, fair values of
financial instruments, fair values of long-lived assets and any
related impairments, capitalization of construction and
installation costs, useful lives of property and equipment,
restructuring accruals and other special items. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
We do not control the decision making process or business
management practices of our equity affiliates. Accordingly, we
rely on management of these affiliates and their independent
auditors to provide us with accurate financial information
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. (GAAP) that we use in the application
of the equity method. We are not aware, however, of any errors
in or possible misstatements of the financial information
provided by our equity affiliates that would have a material
effect on our financial statements. For information concerning
our equity method investments, see note 6.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation.
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our
accounts and all voting interest entities where we exercise a
controlling financial interest through the ownership of a direct
or indirect majority voting interest and variable interest
entities for which our company is the primary beneficiary. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash and Short-Term
Liquid Investments |
Cash equivalents consist of all investments that are readily
convertible into cash and have maturities of three months or
less at the time of acquisition. Restricted cash includes cash
held in escrow and cash held as collateral for lines of credit
and other compensating balances. Cash restricted to a specific
use is classified based on the expected timing of such
disbursement. Short-term liquid investments include marketable
equity securities, certificates of deposit, commercial paper,
corporate bonds and government securities that have original
maturities greater than three months but less than twelve months.
Receivables are reflected net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts. Such allowance aggregated $61,390,000 and $13,947,000
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The allowance
for doubtful accounts is based upon our assessment of probable
loss related to uncollectible accounts receivable. We use a
number of factors in determining the allowance, including, among
other things, collection trends, prevailing and anticipated
economic conditions and specific customer credit risk.
Generally, upon disconnection of a subscriber, the
II-49
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
account is fully reserved. The allowance is maintained until
either receipt of payment or collection of the account is no
longer being pursued.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables
is limited due to the large number of customers and their
dispersion across many different countries worldwide. We also
manage this risk by disconnecting services to customers who are
delinquent.
All debt and marketable equity securities held by our company
are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair
value. Unrealized holding gains and losses on securities that
are classified as available-for-sale are carried net of taxes as
a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings
(loss) in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and
losses generally are determined on an average cost basis. Other
investments in which our ownership interest is less than 20% and
that are not considered marketable securities are carried at
cost. Securities transactions are recorded on the trade date.
For those investments in affiliates in which we have the ability
to exercise significant influence, the equity method of
accounting is used. Generally, we exercise significant influence
through a voting interest between 20% and 50% and/or board
representation and management authority. Under this method, the
investment, originally recorded at cost, is adjusted to
recognize our share of net earnings or losses of the affiliates
as they occur rather than as dividends or other distributions
are received, limited to the extent of our investment in, and
advances and commitments to, the investee. If our investment in
the common stock of an affiliate is reduced to zero as a result
of the prior recognition of the affiliate’s net losses, and
we hold investments in other more senior securities of the
affiliate, we would continue to record losses from the affiliate
to the extent of these additional investments. The amount of
additional losses recorded would be determined based on changes
in the hypothetical amount of proceeds that would be received by
us if the affiliate were to experience a liquidation of its
assets at their current book values. In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (Statement 142), the portion of the difference
between our investment and our share of the net assets of the
investee that represents goodwill (equity method goodwill) is no
longer amortized, but continues to be considered for impairment
under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18. Our share
of net earnings or losses of affiliates also includes any
other-than-temporary declines in fair value recognized during
the period.
Changes in our proportionate share of the underlying equity of a
subsidiary or equity method investee, which result from the
issuance of additional equity securities by such subsidiary or
equity investee, are recognized as increases or decreases to
additional paid-in capital.
We continually review our investments to determine whether a
decline in fair value below the cost basis is
other-than-temporary. The primary factors we consider in our
determination are the length of time that the fair value of the
investment is below our company’s carrying value and the
financial condition, operating performance and near term
prospects of the investee. In addition, we consider the reason
for the decline in fair value, be it general market conditions,
industry specific or investee specific changes in stock price or
valuation subsequent to the balance sheet date; and our intent
and ability to hold the investment for a period of time
sufficient to allow for a recovery in fair value. If the decline
in fair value is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the cost
basis of the security is written down to fair value. In
situations where the fair value of an investment is not evident
due to a lack of a public market price or other factors, we use
our best estimates and assumptions to arrive at the estimated
fair value of such investment. Writedowns for cost investments
and available-for-sale securities are included in the
consolidated statements of operations as other-than-temporary
declines in fair values of investments. Writedowns for equity
method investments are included in share of earnings
(losses) of affiliates.
II-50
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the fair value and the
carrying value of our debt were approximately equal. The
carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash,
short-term liquid investments, receivables, trade and other
receivables, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued
liabilities, subscriber advance payments and deposits and other
current liabilities approximate fair value, due to their short
maturity. The fair values of equity securities are based upon
quoted market prices, to the extent available, at the reporting
date.
We have entered into several derivative instrument contracts
including total return bond swaps, variable forward transactions
and foreign currency derivative instruments. All derivatives,
whether designated in hedging relationships or not, are required
to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. If the
derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in
the fair value of the derivative and of the hedged item
attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. If
the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective
portions of changes in the fair value of the derivative are
recorded in other comprehensive earnings. Ineffective portions
of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges are recognized
in earnings. If the derivative is not designated as a hedge,
changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized in
earnings. None of the derivative instruments that were in effect
during the three years ended December 31, 2004 were
designated as hedges.
Property and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. In accordance with SFAS No. 51,
Financial Reporting by Cable Television Companies, we
capitalize costs associated with the construction of new cable
transmission and distribution facilities and the installation of
new cable services. Capitalized construction and installation
costs include materials, labor and applicable overhead costs.
Installation activities that are capitalized include
(i) the initial connection (or drop) from our cable system
to a customer location, (ii) the replacement of a drop, and
(iii) the installation of equipment for additional
services, such as digital cable, telephone or broadband Internet
service. The costs of other customer-facing activities such as
reconnecting customer locations where a drop already exists,
disconnecting customer locations and repairing or maintaining
drops, are expensed. Interest capitalized with respect to
construction activities was not material during 2004, 2003 and
2002.
Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over
estimated useful lives of 2 to 25 years for cable
distribution systems, 20 to 40 years for buildings and 3 to
15 years for support equipment. The useful lives used to
depreciate cable distribution systems that are undergoing a
rebuild are adjusted such that property and equipment to be
retired will be fully depreciated by the time the rebuild is
completed.
When property and equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of,
the cost and related accumulated depreciation accounts are
relieved of the applicable amounts and any difference is
included in deprecation expense. The impact of such retirements
and disposals was not material during 2004, 2003 and 2002.
Additions, replacements and improvements that extend the asset
life are capitalized. Repairs and maintenance are charged to
operations.
Our primary intangible assets are goodwill, cable television
franchise rights, customer relationships and trade names.
Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over the fair
value of the identifiable net assets acquired
II-51
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
in a business combination. Cable television franchise rights,
customer relationships, and trade names were originally recorded
at their fair values in connection with business combinations.
Pursuant to Statement 142, goodwill and intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but instead are
tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the
provisions of Statement 142. Statement 142 also
provides that equity method goodwill is not amortized, but will
continue to be considered for impairment under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 18. Pursuant to
Statement 142, intangible assets with estimable useful
lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives
to their estimated residual values, and reviewed for impairment
in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(Statement 144).
We do not amortize our franchise rights and certain trade name
intangible assets as we have concluded that these assets are
indefinite-lived assets. Our customer relationship intangible
assets are amortized on a straight line basis over estimated
useful lives ranging from 4 to 10 years.
Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement 142.
Statement 142 required us to perform an assessment of
whether there was an indication that goodwill was impaired as of
the date of adoption. To accomplish this, we identified our
reporting units and determined the carrying value of each
reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities,
including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those
reporting units as of the date of adoption. Statement 142
requires us to consider equity method affiliates as separate
reporting units. As a result, a portion of Liberty’s
enterprise-level goodwill balance was allocated to our reporting
units, including several reporting units whose only asset was a
single equity method investment. For example, a portion of
Liberty’s enterprise level goodwill was allocated to a
separate reporting unit which included only our investment in
J-COM. This allocation is performed for goodwill impairment
testing purposes only and does not change the reported carrying
value of the investment. However, to the extent that all or a
portion of an equity method investment which is part of a
reporting unit containing allocated goodwill is disposed of in
the future, the allocated portion of goodwill will be relieved
and included in the calculation of the gain or loss on disposal.
After we had allocated enterprise level goodwill to our
reporting units, we determined the fair value of our reporting
units using independent appraisals, public trading prices and
other means. We then compared the fair value of each reporting
unit to the reporting unit’s carrying amount. To the extent
a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeded its fair value,
we performed the second step of the transitional impairment
test. In the second step, we compared the implied fair value of
the reporting unit’s goodwill, determined by allocating the
reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets
(recognized and unrecognized) and liabilities in a manner
similar to a purchase price allocation, to its carrying amount,
both of which were measured as of the date of adoption.
In situations where the implied fair value of a reporting
unit’s goodwill was less than its carrying value, we
recorded a transitional impairment charge. As a result, during
2002, we recognized a $238,267,000 transitional impairment loss,
after deducting taxes of $103,105,000, as the cumulative effect
of a change in accounting principle. The foregoing transitional
impairment loss included a pre-tax adjustment of $264,372,000,
representing our proportionate share of transition adjustments
recorded by UGC.
|
|
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
Statement 144 requires that we periodically review the carrying
amounts of our property and equipment and our intangible assets
(other than goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets) to
determine whether current events or circumstances indicate that
such carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If the carrying
amount of the asset is greater than the expected undiscounted
cash flows to be generated by such asset, an impairment
II-52
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
adjustment is to be recognized. Such adjustment is measured by
the amount that the carrying value of such assets exceeds their
fair value. We generally measure fair value by considering sale
prices for similar assets or by discounting estimated future
cash flows using an appropriate discount rate. For purposes of
impairment testing, long-lived assets are grouped at the lowest
level for which cash flows are largely independent of other
assets and liabilities. Assets to be disposed of are carried at
the lower of their financial statement carrying amount or fair
value less costs to sell.
Pursuant to Statement 142, we evaluate the goodwill and
franchise rights for impairment at least annually on
October 1 and whenever other facts and circumstances
indicate that the carrying amounts of goodwill and franchise
rights may not be recoverable. For purposes of the goodwill
evaluation, we compare the fair value of each of our reporting
units to their respective carrying amounts. If the carrying
value of a reporting unit were to exceed its fair value, we
would then compare the implied fair value of the reporting
unit’s goodwill to its carrying amount, and any excess of
the carrying amount over the fair value would be charged to
operations as an impairment loss. Consistent with the provisions
of Emerging Issue Task Force Issue No. 02-7, Unit of
Measure for Testing Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Assets,
we evaluate the recoverability of the carrying amount of our
franchise rights based on the same asset groupings used to
evaluate our long-lived assets because the franchise rights are
inseparable from the other assets in the asset group. Any excess
of the carrying value over the fair value for franchise rights
is charged to operations as an impairment loss.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts and income tax basis of
assets and liabilities and the expected benefits of utilizing
net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, using enacted
tax rates in effect for each taxing jurisdiction in which we
operate for the year in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Net deferred tax assets are
then reduced by a valuation allowance if we believe it
more-likely-than-not such net deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that
includes the enactment date. Deferred tax liabilities related to
investments in foreign subsidiaries and foreign corporate joint
ventures that are essentially permanent in duration are not
recognized until it becomes apparent that such amounts will
reverse in the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation |
The functional currency of our company is the U.S. dollar. The
functional currency of our foreign operations generally is the
applicable local currency for each foreign subsidiary and equity
method investee. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries
and equity investees are translated at the spot rate in effect
at the applicable reporting date, and the consolidated
statements of operations and our company’s share of the
results of operations of its equity affiliates are translated at
the average exchange rates in effect during the applicable
period. The resulting unrealized cumulative translation
adjustment, net of applicable income taxes, is recorded as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings
(loss) in the consolidated statement of stockholders’
equity. Cash flows from our operations in foreign countries are
translated at actual exchange rates when known, or at the
average rate for the period. The effect of exchange rates on
cash balances held in foreign currencies are reported as a
separate line item below cash flows from financing activities.
Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional
currency are recorded based on exchange rates at the time such
transactions arise. Subsequent changes in exchange rates result
in transaction gains and losses which are reflected in the
statements of operations as unrealized (based on the applicable
period end translation) or realized upon settlement of the
transactions.
II-53
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Unless otherwise indicated, convenience translations into
U.S. dollars are calculated as of December 31, 2004.
Cable Network Revenue. We recognize revenue from the
provision of video, telephone and Internet access services over
our cable network to customers in the period the related
services are provided. Installation revenue (including reconnect
fees) related to these services over our cable network is
recognized as revenue in the period in which the installation
occurs, to the extent these fees are equal to or less than
direct selling costs, which are expensed. To the extent
installation revenue exceeds direct selling costs, the excess
fees are deferred and amortized over the average expected
subscriber life. Costs related to reconnections and
disconnections are recognized in the statement of operations as
incurred.
Other Revenue. We recognize revenue from the provision of
direct-to-home satellite services, or DTH, telephone and data
services to business customers outside of our cable network in
the period the related services are provided. Installation
revenue (including reconnect fees) related to these services
outside of our cable network is deferred and amortized over the
average expected subscriber life. Costs related to reconnections
and disconnections are recognized in the statement of operations
as incurred.
Promotional Discounts. For subscriber promotions, such as
discounted or free services during an introductory period,
revenue is recorded at the monthly rate, if any, charged to the
subscriber.
Subscriber Advance Payments and Deposits. Payments
received in advance for distribution services are deferred and
recognized as revenue when the associated services are provided.
Deposits are recorded as a liability upon receipt and refunded
to the subscriber upon disconnection.
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per Common Share |
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by
dividing net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings
(loss) per common share presents the dilutive effect on a
per share basis of potential common shares (e.g. options and
convertible securities) as if they had been converted at the
beginning of the periods presented.
As described in note 2, we issued shares of
LMI Series A common stock and LMI Series B common
stock in connection with the spin off. The pro forma net
earnings (loss) per share amounts set forth in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations were computed
assuming that the shares issued in the spin off were issued and
outstanding since January 1, 2003. In addition, the
weighted average share amounts for periods prior to
July 26, 2004, the date that certain subscription rights
were distributed to our stockholders pursuant to the
LMI Rights Offering, have been increased by 6,866,484 to
give effect to the benefit derived by our stockholders as a
result of the distribution of such subscription rights. The
details of the calculations of our weighted average common
shares outstanding are set forth in the following table:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Basic and diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding before adjustment
|
|
|
158,597,222 |
|
|
|
145,974,318 |
|
|
Adjustment for July 2004 LMI Rights Offering
|
|
|
3,883,504 |
|
|
|
6,866,484 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares, as adjusted
|
|
|
162,480,726 |
|
|
|
152,840,802 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| * |
The weighted average share amounts for all periods assume that
the shares of LMI common stock issued in connection with
the spin off were issued and outstanding since January 1,
2003. |
II-54
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
At December 31, 2004, 4,768,254 potential common
shares were outstanding. All of such potential common shares
represent shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options
that were issued in June 2004 and adjusted in connection with
the LMI Rights Offering. Potential common shares have been
excluded from the pro forma calculation of diluted earnings per
share in 2004 because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Prior to the consummation of the spin off, no potential common
shares were outstanding, and accordingly, there is no difference
between basic and diluted earnings per share in 2003.
As a result of the spin off and related adjustments to
Liberty’s stock incentive awards, options to acquire an
aggregate of 1,595,709 shares of LMI Series A common
stock and 1,498,154 shares of LMI Series B common
stock were issued to our and Liberty’s employees.
Consistent with Liberty’s accounting for the adjusted
Liberty stock options and stock appreciation rights prior to the
Spin Off Date, we use variable-plan accounting to account for
all LMI stock options issued as adjustments of
Liberty’s stock incentive awards in connection with the
spin off.
In addition, options to acquire an aggregate of
453,206 shares of LMI Series A common stock and
1,568,562 shares of LMI Series B common stock were
issued to LMI employees and directors in June 2004. Prior to the
LMI Rights Offering, we used fixed-plan accounting to account
for these LMI stock options. As a result of the modification of
certain terms of the LMI stock options that were outstanding at
the time of the LMI Rights Offering, we began accounting for
these LMI options as variable-plan options. In addition, options
to acquire an aggregate 7,000 shares of LMI Series A
common stock were issued to LMI employees and directors
subsequent to the LMI Rights Offering. These options were
granted at fair market value and, as such, are accounted for
using fixed-plan accounting.
As a result of the spin off and the related issuance of options
to acquire LMI common stock, certain persons who remained
employees of Liberty immediately following the spin off hold
options to purchase LMI common stock and certain persons who are
our employees hold options, stock appreciation rights (SARs) and
options with tandem SARs with respect to Liberty common stock.
Pursuant to the Reorganization Agreement, we are responsible for
all stock incentive awards related to LMI common stock and
Liberty is responsible for all stock incentive awards related to
Liberty common stock regardless of whether such stock incentive
awards are held by our or Liberty’s employees.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, our stock-based compensation
expense is based on the stock incentive awards held by our
employees regardless of whether such awards relate to LMI or
Liberty common stock. Accordingly, any stock-based compensation
that we include in our statements of operations with respect to
Liberty stock incentive awards is treated as a capital
transaction that is reflected as an adjustment of additional
paid-in capital.
We account for our fixed and variable stock-based compensation
plans using the intrinsic value method. Generally, under the
intrinsic value method, (i) compensation expense for
fixed-plan stock options is recognized only if the estimated
fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price on
the date of grant, in which case, compensation is recognized
based on the percentage of options that are vested until the
options are exercised, expire or are cancelled, and
(ii) compensation for variable-plan options is recognized
based upon the percentage of the options that are vested and the
difference between the estimated fair value of the underlying
common stock and the exercise price of the options at the
balance sheet date, until the options are exercised, expire or
are cancelled. We record stock-based compensation expense for
our stock appreciation rights (SARs) using the accelerated
expense attribution method. We record compensation expense for
restricted stock awards based on the quoted market price of our
stock at the date of grant and the vesting period.
II-55
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
As a result of the modification of certain terms of its stock
options in connection with its February 2004 rights offering,
UGC began accounting for its stock options that it granted prior
to February 2004 as variable plan options. UGC stock options
granted subsequent to February 2004 are accounted for as
fixed-plan options. Most of the stock-based compensation
included in our consolidated statements of operations in 2004 is
attributable to UGC’s stock incentive awards.
The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings
(loss) and earnings (loss) per share as if we had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123,
“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,”
(Statement 123) to our outstanding options. As the
accounting for the liability-based SARs is the same under the
intrinsic value method and the fair value method, the pro forma
adjustments included in the following table do not include
amounts related to our calculation of compensation expense
related to SARs or to options with tandem SARs:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, | |
| |
|
except per share amounts | |
|
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
(31,758 |
) |
|
|
20,889 |
|
|
|
(568,154 |
) |
| |
Add stock-based compensation charges as determined under the
intrinsic value method, net of taxes
|
|
|
51,524 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Deduct stock compensation charges as determined under the fair
value method, net of taxes
|
|
|
(29,904 |
) |
|
|
(832 |
) |
|
|
(1,498 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
(10,138 |
) |
|
|
20,057 |
|
|
|
(569,652 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) from continuing
operations per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (Statement No. 123(R)),
which is a revision of Statement 123, as amended by Statement
No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure and Amendment of
Statement No. 123 (Statement 148). Statement
No. 123(R) supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion
(APB) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB 25) and amends certain provisions of
Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Statement
No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the financial statements based on their fair values, beginning
with the first interim or annual period after June 15,
2005, with early adoption encouraged. In addition, Statement
No. 123(R) will cause unrecognized expense (based on the
amounts in our pro forma footnote disclosure) related to options
vesting after the date of initial adoption to be recognized as a
charge to operations over the remaining vesting period. We are
required to adopt Statement No. 123(R) in our third quarter
of 2005, beginning July 1, 2005. Under Statement
No. 123(R), we must determine the appropriate fair value
model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the
amortization method for compensation cost and the transition
method to be used at the date of adoption. The transition
alternatives include prospective and retroactive adoption
methods. Under the retroactive methods, prior periods may be
restated either as of the beginning of the year of adoption or
for all
II-56
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
periods presented. The prospective method requires that
compensation expense be recorded for all unvested stock options
and share awards at the beginning of the first quarter of
adoption of Statement No. 123(R), while the retroactive
methods would record compensation expense for all unvested stock
options and share awards beginning with the first period
restated. We are evaluating the requirements of Statement
No. 123(R) and we expect that the adoption of Statement
No. 123(R) will have a material impact on our consolidated
results of operations and earnings per share. We have not yet
determined the method of adoption for Statement No. 123(R).
(5) Acquisitions
|
|
|
Acquisition of Controlling Interest in UGC |
On January 5, 2004, we completed a transaction pursuant to
which UGC’s founding shareholders (the Founders)
transferred 8.2 million shares of UGC Class B common
stock to our company in exchange for 12.6 million shares of
Liberty Series A common stock valued, for accounting
purposes, at $152,122,000 and a cash payment of $12,857,000. We
also incurred $2,970,000 of acquisition costs in connection with
this transaction (the UGC Founders Transaction). The UGC
Founders Transaction was the last of a number of independent
transactions that occurred from 2001 through January 2004
pursuant to which we acquired our controlling interest in UGC.
For information concerning our transactions with UGC during 2003
and 2002, see note 6.
Our acquisition of 281.3 million shares of UGC common stock
in January 2002 gave us a greater than 50% economic interest in
UGC, but due to certain voting and standstill arrangements, we
used the equity method to account for our investment in UGC
through December 31, 2003. Upon closing of the
January 5, 2004 transaction, the restrictions on the
exercise by us of our voting power with respect to UGC
terminated, and we gained voting control of UGC. Accordingly,
UGC has been accounted for as a consolidated subsidiary and
included in our financial position and results of operations
since January 1, 2004. We have accounted for our
acquisition of UGC as a step acquisition, and have allocated our
investment basis to our pro rata share of UGC’s assets and
liabilities at each significant acquisition date based on the
estimated fair values of such assets and liabilities on such
dates. Prior to the acquisition of the Founders’ shares,
our investment basis in UGC had been reduced to zero as a result
of the prior recognition of our share of UGC’s losses. The
following
II-57
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
table reflects the amounts allocated to our assets and
liabilities upon completion of the January 2004 acquisition of
the Founders’ shares (amounts in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
310,361 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
298,826 |
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
3,386,252 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,023,374 |
|
|
Customer relationships(1)
|
|
|
379,093 |
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
62,441 |
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
4,532 |
|
|
Investments and other assets
|
|
|
347,542 |
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,407,275 |
) |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(3,615,902 |
) |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(754,111 |
) |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(259,492 |
) |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(607,692 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Aggregate purchase price
|
|
|
167,949 |
|
|
Issuance of Liberty common stock
|
|
|
(152,122 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Aggregate cash consideration (including direct acquisition costs)
|
|
$ |
15,827 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The estimated weighted-average amortization period on
January 1, 2004 for the intangible asset associated with
customer relationships was 4.9 years. |
We have entered into a new Standstill Agreement with UGC that
limits our ownership of UGC common stock to 90% of the
outstanding common stock unless we make an offer or effect
another transaction to acquire all outstanding UGC common stock.
Under certain circumstances, such an offer or transaction would
require an independent appraisal to establish the price to be
paid to stockholders unaffiliated with us. Subsequent to
December 31, 2004, we and UGC entered into a merger
agreement whereby a newly-formed holding company will acquire
all of the capital stock of our company and all of the capital
stock of UGC not owned by our company. For additional
information, see note 1.
During 2004, we also purchased an additional 20 million
shares of UGC Class A common stock pursuant to certain
pre-emptive rights granted to our company by UGC. The
$152,284,000 purchase price for such shares was comprised of
(i) the cancellation of indebtedness due from subsidiaries
of UGC to certain of our subsidiaries in the amount of
$104,462,000 (including accrued interest) and
(ii) $47,822,000 in cash. As UGC was one of our
consolidated subsidiaries at the time of these purchases, the
effect of these purchases was eliminated in consolidation.
Also, in January 2004, UGC initiated a rights offering pursuant
to which holders of each of UGC’s Class A,
Class B and Class C common stock received 0.28
transferable subscription rights to purchase a like class of
common stock for each share of UGC common stock owned by them on
January 21, 2004. The rights offering expired on
February 12, 2004. UGC received cash proceeds of
approximately $1.02 billion from the rights offering. As a
holder of UGC Class A, Class B and Class C common
stock, we participated in the rights offering and exercised our
rights to purchase 90.7 million shares for a total cash
purchase price of $544,250,000.
II-58
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
On May 20, 2004, we acquired all of the issued and
outstanding ordinary shares of Princes Holdings Limited
(PHL) for
€2,447,000,
including
€447,000 of
acquisition costs ($2,918,000 at May 20, 2004). PHL,
through its subsidiary Chorus Communications Limited, owns and
operates broadband communications systems in Ireland. In
connection with this acquisition, we loaned an aggregate of
€75,000,000
($89,483,000 as of May 20, 2004) to PHL. The proceeds from
this loan were used by PHL to discharge liabilities pursuant to
a debt restructuring plan and to provide funds for capital
expenditures and working capital. In June 2004, LMI loaned PHL
an additional
€4,500,000
($6,137,000), for a total of
€79,500,000
($108,414,000) as of December 31, 2004. This loan bears
interest at 1.75% per annum. In addition to the amounts
loaned to PHL as of December 31, 2004, we have committed to
loan to PHL up to
€10,000,000
($13,637,000) at December 31, 2004.
We have accounted for this acquisition using the purchase method
of accounting. For financial reporting purposes, the PHL
acquisition is deemed to have occurred on June 1, 2004. The
purchase price allocation for this acquisition is as follows
(amounts in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
14,473 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
7,423 |
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
75,172 |
|
|
Customer relationships(1)
|
|
|
10,239 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
24,023 |
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(26,078 |
) |
|
Subscriber advance payments and deposits
|
|
|
(12,851 |
) |
|
Debt
|
|
|
(89,483 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Aggregate cash consideration (including acquisition costs)
|
|
$ |
2,918 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The estimated weighted-average amortization period at
acquisition for the intangible asset associated with customer
relationships was 4 years. |
On December 16, 2004, UGC acquired our interest in PHL in
exchange for 6,413,991 shares of UGC Class A common
stock, valued for accounting purposes at $58,303,000 on that
date. In connection with UGC’s acquisition of our interest
in PHL, UGC committed to refinance our loans to PHL no later
than June 16, 2005. We and UGC accounted for this
transaction as a reorganization of entities under common control
at historical cost, similar to a pooling of interests. Under
reorganization accounting, UGC consolidated the financial
position and results of operations of PHL using LMI’s
historical cost, as if this transaction had been consummated by
UGC as of May 20, 2004 (June 1, 2004 for financial
reporting purposes), the date of the original acquisition of PHL
by our company. As UGC was a consolidated subsidiary of LMI at
the time of this transaction, the shares of UGC Class A
common stock received by LMI were eliminated in consolidation.
On July 1, 2004, UPC Broadband France SAS (UPC Broadband
France), an indirect subsidiary of UGC and the owner of
UGC’s French broadband video and Internet access
operations, acquired Suez-Lyonnaise Télécom SA
(Noos), from Suez SA (Suez). Noos is a provider of digital
and analog cable television services and high-speed Internet
access services in France. UPC Broadband France purchased Noos
to achieve certain financial, operational and strategic benefits
through the integration of Noos with its French operations and
the
II-59
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
creation of a platform for further growth and innovation in
Paris and its remaining French systems. The preliminary purchase
price was subject to a review of certain historical financial
information of Noos and UPC Broadband France. In January
2005, UGC completed its purchase price review with Suez, which
resulted in a
€42,844,000
($52,128,000) reduction in the purchase price. The receivable
that resulted from this purchase price reduction is included in
other receivables in our consolidated balance sheet. The final
purchase price for Noos was approximately
€567,102,000
($689,989,000), consisting of
€487,085,000
($592,633,000) in cash and a 19.9% equity interest in UPC
Broadband France, valued at approximately
€71,339,000
($86,798,000). Acquisition costs totaled
€8,678,000
($10,558,000).
UGC accounted for this transaction as the acquisition of an
80.1% interest in Noos and the sale of a 19.9% interest in UPC
Broadband France. Under the purchase method of accounting, the
preliminary purchase price was allocated to the acquired
identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities
based upon their respective fair values. UGC recorded a loss of
approximately
€9,679,000
($11,776,000) associated with the dilution of its ownership
interest in UPC Broadband France as a result of the Noos
transaction. Our $6,102,000 share of this loss is reflected as a
reduction of additional paid-in capital in our consolidated
statement of stockholders’ equity.
The following table presents the purchase price allocation for
UGC’s acquisition of an 80.1% interest in Noos, together
with the effects of the sale of a 19.9% interest in UGC’s
historical French operations (amounts in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
(106,744 |
) |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
769,852 |
|
|
Intangible assets(1)
|
|
|
11,815 |
|
|
Other long-term assets
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(7,099 |
) |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(91,033 |
) |
|
Equity in UPC Broadband France
|
|
|
11,776 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration for Noos
|
|
|
592,633 |
|
|
Less cash acquired
|
|
|
(18,791 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Net cash consideration for Noos
|
|
$ |
573,842 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The estimated weighted-average amortization period for the
intangible assets (favorable programming contract and tradename)
at acquisition was 3.8 years. |
The allocation above was made based on UGC’s assessment of
the fair value of the assets and liabilities of Noos. As of
December 31, 2004, this assessment had not been finalized,
but UGC does not expect further significant purchase accounting
adjustments. Minority interest was computed based on 19.9% of
the fair value of our historical French operations and 19.9% of
the historical carrying amount of Noos.
Suez’ 19.9% interest in UPC Broadband France consists of
85,000,000 shares of Class B common stock of UPC Broadband
France (the Class B Shares). Subject to the terms of a call
option agreement, UPC France Holding BV (UPC France), UGC’s
indirect wholly owned subsidiary, has the right through
June 30, 2005 to purchase from Suez all of the Class B
Shares for
€85,000,000,
subject to adjustment, plus interest. The purchase price for the
Class B Shares may be paid in cash, UGC Class A common
stock or LMI Series A common stock. Subject to the terms of
a put option, Suez may require UPC France to purchase the
Class B Shares at specific times prior to or after the
third, fourth or fifth anniversaries of the purchase date.
II-60
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
UPC France will be required to pay the then fair value,
payable in cash, UGC common stock or LMI Series A common
stock, for the Class B Shares or assist Suez in obtaining
an offer to purchase the Class B Shares. UPC France also
has the option to purchase the Class B Shares from Suez shortly
after the third, fourth or fifth anniversaries of the purchase
date at the then fair value in cash, UGC Class A common
stock or LMI Series A common stock.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
operating results give effect to the UGC, PHL and Noos
transactions as if they had been completed as of January 1,
2004 (for 2004 results) and as of January 1, 2003 (for 2003
results). These pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative
of operating results that would have occurred if the UGC, PHL
and Noos acquisitions had occurred on such dates. The pro forma
adjustments are based upon currently available information and
upon certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Years ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, | |
| |
|
except per share amounts | |
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
2,877,159 |
|
|
|
2,429,548 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(44,158 |
) |
|
|
(690,869 |
) |
|
Loss per share
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
|
(4.52 |
) |
(6) Investments in Affiliates
Accounted for Using the Equity Method
Our affiliates generally are engaged in the cable and/or
programming businesses in various foreign countries. The
following table includes our company’s carrying value and
approximate percentage ownership of our more significant
investments in affiliates:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Percentage | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Carrying | |
| |
|
Ownership | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, | |
| |
|
except percent amounts | |
|
Super Media/ J-COM
|
|
|
70% |
|
|
$ |
1,052,468 |
|
|
|
1,330,602 |
|
|
JPC
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
|
290,224 |
|
|
|
259,571 |
|
|
Telenet Group Holdings N.V. (Telenet)
|
|
|
19% |
|
|
|
232,649 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Mediatti Communications, Inc. (Mediatti)
|
|
|
37% |
|
|
|
58,586 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Metrópolis-Intercom S.A. (Metrópolis),
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
|
57,344 |
|
|
|
52,223 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Various |
|
|
|
174,371 |
|
|
|
98,156 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,865,642 |
|
|
|
1,740,552 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-61
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
The following table sets forth our share of earnings
(losses) of affiliates including any writedowns for
other-than-temporary declines in fair value:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Super Media/ J-COM
|
|
$ |
45,092 |
|
|
|
20,341 |
|
|
|
(21,595 |
) |
|
JPC
|
|
|
14,644 |
|
|
|
11,775 |
|
|
|
5,801 |
|
|
Mediatti
|
|
|
(2,331 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Metrópolis
|
|
|
(8,355 |
) |
|
|
(8,291 |
) |
|
|
(80,394 |
) |
|
UGC
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(190,216 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(10,340 |
) |
|
|
(10,086 |
) |
|
|
(44,821 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
38,710 |
|
|
|
13,739 |
|
|
|
(331,225 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of earnings (losses) of affiliates includes
losses related to other-than-temporary declines in the value of
our equity method investments of $25,973,000, $12,616,000, and
$72,030,000 during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Substantially all of such losses relate to our affiliates that
operate in Latin America.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the aggregate carrying
amount of our investments in affiliates exceeded our
proportionate share of our affiliates’ net assets by
$757,235,000 and $690,332,000, respectively. Any calculated
excess costs on investments are allocated on an estimated fair
value basis to the underlying assets and liabilities of the
investee. Amounts associated with assets other than goodwill and
indefinite lived intangible assets are amortized over their
estimated useful lives.
J-COM was incorporated in 1995 to own and operate broadband
businesses in Japan. The functional currency of J-COM is the
Japanese yen. On December 28, 2004, our 45.45% ownership
interest in J-COM, and a 19.78% interest in J-COM owned by
Sumitomo Corporation (Sumitomo) were combined in Super Media. As
a result of these transactions, we held a 69.68% noncontrolling
interest in Super Media, and Super Media held a 65.23%
controlling interest in J-COM at December 31, 2004. At
December 31, 2004, Sumitomo also held a 12.25% direct interest
in J-COM and Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) held a 19.46%
beneficial interest in J-COM. Subject to certain conditions,
Sumitomo has the obligation to contribute to Super Media
substantially all of its remaining 12.25% equity interest in
J-COM during 2005. Also, Sumitomo and we are generally required
to contribute to Super Media any additional shares of J-COM that
either of us acquires and to permit the other party to
participate in any additional acquisition of J-COM shares during
the term of Super Media.
Due to certain veto rights held by Sumitomo, we accounted for
our 69.68% ownership interest in Super Media using the equity
method of accounting at December 31, 2004. On
February 18, 2005, J-COM announced an initial public
offering of its common shares in Japan. Under the terms of the
operating agreement of Super Media, our casting or tie-breaking
vote with respect to decisions of the management committee
became effective upon this announcement. Super Media is managed
by a management committee consisting of two members, one
appointed by us and one appointed by Sumitomo. From and after
February 18, 2005, the management committee member
appointed by us has a casting or deciding vote with respect to
any management committee decision that we and Sumitomo are
unable to agree on, with the exception of the terms of the
initial public offering of J-COM. Certain decisions with respect
to Super Media will continue to require the consent of both
members rather than the management committee. These include any
decision to engage in any business other than holding J-COM
shares, sell J-COM shares, issue additional units in Super
II-62
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Media, make in-kind distributions or dissolve Super Media, in
each case other than as contemplated by the Super Media
operating agreement.
As a result of the above-described change in the governance of
Super Media, we will begin accounting for Super Media and J-COM
as consolidated subsidiaries effective January 1, 2005. If
all of the J-COM shares offered for sale by J-COM in the initial
public offering are sold (including pursuant to the
underwriters’ over-allotment option). Super Media’s
equity interests in J-COM will be diluted to approximately
52.84%.
Super Media will be dissolved in February 2010 unless we and
Sumitomo mutually agree to extend the term. Super Media may also
be earlier dissolved under specified circumstances.
On August 6, 2004, J-COM used cash proceeds received
pursuant to capital contributions from our company, Sumitomo and
Microsoft to repay shareholder loans with an aggregate principal
amount of ¥30,000 million ($275,660,000 at
August 6, 2004). Such amount includes
¥14,065 million ($129,237,000 at August 6, 2004)
of shareholder loans held by us that were effectively converted
to equity in these transactions. Such transactions did not
materially impact the J-COM ownership interests of our company,
Sumitomo or Microsoft.
On December 21, 2004, we received cash proceeds of
¥42,755 million ($410,080,000 at December 21,
2004) in repayment of all principal and interest due to our
company from J-COM pursuant to then outstanding shareholder
loans. In connection with this transaction, we recognized in our
statement of operations foreign currency translation gains of
$55,350,000 that previously had been reflected in accumulated
other comprehensive earnings and deferred taxes.
On February 25, 2005, J-COM acquired the respective
interests of Sumitomo, Microsoft and our company in Chofu Cable,
Inc. (Chofu Cable), a Japanese broadband communications
provider, for cash consideration of ¥2,884 million
($27,358,000 at February 25, 2005), of which
¥972 million ($9,223,000 at February 25, 2005)
was paid to our company for our equity method investment in
Chofu Cable. As a result of this acquisition, J-COM owns an
approximate 92% equity interest in Chofu Cable.
In 2003, we purchased an 8% equity interest in J-COM from
Sumitomo for $141,000,000 in cash, and we and Sumitomo each
converted certain shareholder loans to equity interests in J-COM.
Summarized financial information for J-COM is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$ |
65,178 |
|
|
|
52,962 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,441,196 |
|
|
|
2,274,632 |
|
|
Intangible and other assets, net
|
|
|
1,783,162 |
|
|
|
1,601,596 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,289,536 |
|
|
|
3,929,190 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$ |
2,260,805 |
|
|
|
2,378,698 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
677,595 |
|
|
|
649,229 |
|
|
Owners’ equity
|
|
|
1,351,136 |
|
|
|
901,263 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$ |
4,289,536 |
|
|
|
3,929,190 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-63
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
1,504,709 |
|
|
|
1,233,492 |
|
|
|
930,736 |
|
|
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(915,112 |
) |
|
|
(805,174 |
) |
|
|
(719,590 |
) |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(783 |
) |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(378,868 |
) |
|
|
(313,725 |
) |
|
|
(240,042 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
209,946 |
|
|
|
113,753 |
|
|
|
(29,390 |
) |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(94,958 |
) |
|
|
(68,980 |
) |
|
|
(33,381 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(15,532 |
) |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
99,456 |
|
|
|
46,108 |
|
|
|
(60,192 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPC, a 50% joint venture formed in 1996 by our company and
Sumitomo, is a programming company in Japan, which owns and
invests in a variety of channels including Shop Channel.
The functional currency of JPC is the Japanese yen.
At December 31, 2004, our investment in JPC included
¥500 million ($4,882,000) of shareholder loans to JPC.
Such loans are denominated in Japanese yen and bear interest at
variable rates (1.55% at December 31, 2004). Such
shareholder loans are due and payable on July 26, 2008.
On April 22, 2004, JPC issued 24,000 shares of JPC ordinary
shares to Sumitomo for ¥6 billion ($54,260,000 as of
April 22, 2004). On April 26, 2004, JPC paid
¥3 billion ($27,677,000 as of April 26, 2004) to
each of our company and Sumitomo to redeem 12,000 shares of JPC
ordinary shares from each shareholder. On April 27, 2004,
we transferred our 100% indirect ownership interest in Liberty
J-Sports, Inc. (Liberty J-Sports), the owner of an indirect
minority interest in J-SPORTS Broadcasting Corporation, to JPC
in exchange for 24,000 ordinary shares of JPC valued at
¥6 billion ($54,805,000 as of April 27, 2004). We
recognized a $25,256,000 gain on this transaction, representing
the excess of the cash received from the earlier share
redemption over 50% of our historical cost basis in Liberty
J-Sports.
On December 16, 2004, chellomedia Belgium I BV and
chellomedia Belgium II BV, UGC’s indirect wholly owned
subsidiaries (collectively, chellomedia Belgium), acquired our
wholly owned subsidiary Belgian Cable Holdings (BCH) for
$121,068,000 in cash. BCH’s only assets were debt
securities of Callahan Partners Europe (CPE) and one of two
entities majority-owned by CPE (the InvestCos), and certain
related contract rights. This purchase price was equal to our
cost basis in these debt securities, which included an
unrealized gain of $10,517,000. On December 17, 2004, UGC
entered into a restructuring transaction with CPE and certain
other parties. In this restructuring, BCH contributed
approximately $137,950,000 in cash and the debt security of the
InvestCo to Belgian Cable Investors, LLC (Belgian Cable
Investors) in exchange for a 78.4% common equity interest and
100% preferred equity interest in Belgian Cable Investors. CPE
owns the remaining 21.6% interest in Belgian Cable Investors.
Belgian Cable Investors distributed approximately $115,592,000
in cash to CPE, which used the proceeds to repurchase the debt
securities of CPE held by BCH. Belgian Cable Investors holds an
indirect 14.1% interest in Telenet Group Holding NV (Telenet)
and certain call options expiring in 2007 and 2009 to acquire
3.36 million shares (11.6%) and 5.11 million shares
II-64
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
(17.6%), respectively, of the outstanding equity of Telenet from
existing shareholders. Belgian Cable Investors’ indirect
14.1% interest in Telenet results from its majority ownership of
the InvestCos, which hold in the aggregate 18.99% of the stock
of Telenet, and a shareholders agreement among Belgian Cable
Investors and three unaffiliated investors in the InvestCos that
governs the voting and disposition of 21.36% of the stock of
Telenet, including the stock held by the InvestCos. Telenet is a
cable system operator in Belgium.
The restructuring was accounted for as a fair value transaction,
in which BCH effectively transferred its debt securities and
approximately $22,358,000 in return for an equity interest in
Belgian Cable Investors. As this was a transaction consummated
at fair value, we recognized the $10,517,000 unrealized gain
associated with the CPE and InvestCo debt securities as a
realized gain in our consolidated statement of operations. We
have determined that the InvestCos are variable interest
entities, in which Belgian Cable Investors is the primary
beneficiary. Certain of the securities of the InvestCos held by
the InvestCos’ shareholders have a mandatory redemption
feature, and accordingly, we have classified such securities
attributable to the other shareholders of the InvestCos as debt.
See note 10. In our preliminary allocation of the purchase
price, we have allocated $232,649,000 to the investment in
Telenet and the call options to purchase additional shares of
Telenet, and have allocated $87,821,000 to the InvestCos’
securities that we have classified as debt, based on our
preliminary assessment of fair values. We expect our purchase
price allocation to be finalized during the first quarter of
2005. For financial reporting purposes, the restructuring
transaction was deemed to have occurred on December 31,
2004.
Pursuant to the Telenet shareholders agreement, the InvestCos
are able to vote a 25% interest plus one vote on certain Telenet
matters that require a 75% vote to pass. In addition, through
its interest in the InvestCos, UGC has two representatives on
Telenet’s board of directors. Based on the InvestCos voting
ability, board membership and ability to acquire significantly
more direct ownership of Telenet through the call options, UGC
believes that the InvestCos exercise significant influence over
Telenet. Therefore, we account for our indirect investment in
Telenet using the equity method of accounting.
Pursuant to the agreement with CPE governing Belgian Cable
Investors, CPE has the right to require BCH to purchase all of
CPE’s interest in Belgian Cable Investors for the then
appraised fair value of such interest during the first
30 days of every six-month period beginning in December
2007. BCH has the corresponding right to require CPE to sell all
of its interest in Belgian Cable Investors to BCH for appraised
fair value during the first 30 days of every six-month
period following December 2009.
During 2004, we completed three transactions that resulted in
our acquisition of 21,572 Mediatti shares for an aggregate cash
purchase price of ¥6,257 million ($59,129,000).
Mediatti is a provider of cable television and high speed
Internet access services in Japan. Our interest in Mediatti is
held through Liberty Japan MC, LLC, (Liberty Japan MC) a company
of which we own approximately 93.1% and Sumitomo owns
approximately 6.9%. Sumitomo has the option until February 2006
to increase its ownership interest in Liberty Japan MC to up to
50%.
Liberty Japan MC owns a 36.4% voting interest in Mediatti and an
additional 0.87% interest that has limited veto rights. Liberty
Japan MC has the option until February 2006 to acquire from
Mediatti up to 9,463 additional shares in Mediatti at a price of
¥290,000 ($3,000) per share. If such option is fully
exercised, Liberty Japan MC’s interest in Mediatti will be
approximately 46%. The additional interest that Liberty Japan MC
has the right to acquire may initially be in the form of
non-voting Class A shares, but it is expected that any
Class A shares owned by Liberty Japan MC will be converted
to voting common stock.
II-65
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Liberty Japan MC, Olympus Mediacom L.P. (Olympus Mediacom) and
two minority shareholders of Mediatti have entered into a
shareholders agreement pursuant to which Liberty Japan MC has
the right to nominate three of Mediatti’s seven directors
and which requires that significant actions by Mediatti be
approved by at least one director nominated by Liberty Japan MC.
The Mediatti shareholders who are party to the shareholders
agreement have granted to each other party whose ownership
interest is greater than 10%, a right of first refusal with
respect to transfers of their respective interests in Mediatti.
Each shareholder also has tag-along rights with respect to such
transfers. Olympus Mediacom has a put right that is first
exercisable during July 2008 to require Liberty Japan MC to
purchase all of its Mediatti shares at fair market value. If
Olympus exercises such right, the two minority shareholders who
are party to the shareholders agreement may also require Liberty
Japan MC to purchase their Mediatti shares at fair market value.
If Olympus Mediacom does not exercise such right, Liberty Japan
MC has a call right that is first exercisable during July 2009
to require Olympus Mediacom and the minority shareholders to
sell their Mediatti shares to Liberty Japan MC at fair market
value. If both the Olympus Mediacom put right and the Liberty
Japan MC call right expire without being exercised during the
first exercise period, either may thereafter exercise its put or
call right, as applicable, until October 2010.
We hold a 50% interest in Metrópolis, a cable operator in
Chile. On January 23, 2004, we, Liberty and CristalChile
entered into an agreement pursuant to which each agreed to use
its respective commercially reasonable efforts to combine the
businesses of Metrópolis and VTR GlobalCom S.A. (VTR), a
wholly owned subsidiary of UGC that owns UGC’s Chilean
operations. If the proposed combination is consummated, UGC
would own 80% of the voting and equity rights in the combined
entity, and CristalChile would own the remaining 20%. We would
also receive a promissory note (the amount of which is subject
to negotiation) from the combined entity, which would be
unsecured and subordinated to third party debt. In addition,
CristalChile would have a put right which would allow
CristalChile to require UGC to purchase all, but not less than
all, of its interest in the combined entity at the fair value of
the interest, subject to a minimum price of $140 million.
This put right will end on the tenth anniversary of the
combination. Liberty has agreed to perform UGC’s
obligations under CristalChile’s put if UGC does not do so
and, in connection with the spin off, we agreed to indemnify
Liberty against its obligations with respect to
CristalChile’s put right. If the merger does not occur, we
and CristalChile have agreed to fund our pro rata share of a
capital call sufficient to retire Metropolis’ local debt
facility, which had an outstanding principal amount of Chilean
pesos 30.2 billion ($54,399,000) at December 31, 2004.
The combination is subject to certain conditions, including the
execution of definitive agreements, Chilean regulatory approval,
the approval of the respective boards of directors of the
relevant parties (including, in the case of UGC, the independent
members of UGC’s board of directors) and the receipt of
necessary third party approvals and waivers. The Chilean
antitrust authorities approved the combination in October 2004
subject to certain conditions. The primary conditions require
that the combined entity (i) re-sell broadband capacity to
third party Internet service providers on a wholesale basis;
(ii) activate two-way capacity on all portions of the
combined network within five years; and (iii) limit basic
tier price increases to the rate of inflation plus a programming
cost escalator over the next three years. An action was filed
with the Chilean Supreme Court seeking to reverse such approval,
but the action was dismissed on March 10, 2005. We,
CristalChile and UGC are currently negotiating the terms of the
definitive agreements for the combination.
Due to increased competition, losses in subscribers and a
decrease in operating income in 2002, we determined that the
carrying value of our investment in Metrópolis including
allocated enterprise-level goodwill, exceeded the estimated fair
value of this investment, which fair value was based on a
per-subscriber valuation. Accordingly, we recorded an
other-than-temporary decline in value of $66,555,000, which is
included in share
II-66
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
of losses of affiliates in 2002, and an impairment of long-lived
assets of $39,000,000 related to the allocated enterprise-level
goodwill for Metrópolis.
On January 30, 2002, our company and UGC completed a
transaction (the 2002 UGC Transaction) pursuant to which UGC was
formed to own Old UGC, Inc. (Old UGC) (formerly known as UGC
Holdings, Inc.). Upon consummation of the 2002 UGC Transaction,
all shares of Old UGC common stock were exchanged for shares of
common stock of UGC. In addition, we contributed (i) cash
consideration of $200,000,000, (ii) a note receivable from
Belmarken Holding B.V., (Belmarken) an indirect subsidiary of
Old UGC, with an accreted value of $891,671,000 and a carrying
value of $495,603,000 (the Belmarken Loan) and (iii) Senior
Notes and Senior Discount Notes of United-Pan Europe
Communications N.V. (UPC), a subsidiary of Old UGC, with an
aggregate carrying amount of $270,398,000 to UGC in exchange for
281.3 million shares of UGC Class C common stock with
a fair value of $1,406,441,000. We accounted for the 2002 UGC
Transaction as the acquisition of an additional noncontrolling
interest in UGC in exchange for monetary financial instruments.
Accordingly, we calculated a $440,440,000 gain on the
transaction based on the difference between the estimated fair
value of the financial instruments and their carrying value. Due
to our continuing indirect ownership in the assets contributed
to UGC, our company limited the amount of gain it recognized to
the minority shareholders’ attributable share
(approximately 28%) of such assets or $122,618,000 (before
deferred tax expense of $47,821,000).
Also on January 30, 2002, UGC acquired from our company our
debt and equity interests in IDT United, Inc. and
$751 million principal amount at maturity of UGC’s
$1,375 million
103/4%
senior secured discount notes due 2008 (2008 Notes), which had
been distributed to us in redemption of a portion of our
interest in IDT United and repayment of a portion of IDT
United’s debt to our company. IDT United was formed as an
indirect subsidiary of IDT Corporation for purposes of effecting
a tender offer for all outstanding 2008 Notes at a purchase
price of $400 per $1,000 principal amount at maturity, which
tender offer expired on February 1, 2002. The aggregate
purchase price for our interest in IDT United of
$448 million equaled the aggregate amount we had invested
in IDT United, plus interest. Approximately $305 million of
the purchase price was paid by the assumption by UGC of debt
owed by our company to a subsidiary of Old UGC, and the
remainder was credited against our company’s
$200 million cash contribution to UGC described above. In
connection with the 2002 UGC Transaction, a subsidiary of our
company made loans to a subsidiary of UGC aggregating
$103 million. Such loans accrued interest at 8% per annum.
At December 31, 2003, we owned approximately
296 million shares of UGC common stock, or an approximate
50% economic interest and an 87% voting interest in UGC.
Pursuant to certain voting and standstill arrangements, we were
unable to exercise control of UGC, and accordingly, we used the
equity method of accounting for our investment through
December 31, 2003.
Because we had no commitment to make additional capital
contributions to UGC, we suspended recording our share of
UGC’s losses when the carrying value of our investment in
UGC was reduced to zero in 2002.
On September 3, 2003, UPC completed a restructuring of its
debt instruments and emerged from bankruptcy. Under the terms of
the restructuring, approximately $5.4 billion of UPC’s
debt was exchanged for equity of UGC Europe, Inc., a new holding
company of UPC (UGC Europe). Upon consummation, UGC received
approximately 65.5% of UGC Europe’s equity in exchange for
UPC debt securities that it owned; third-party noteholders
received approximately 32.5% of UGC Europe’s equity; and
existing preferred and ordinary shareholders, including UGC,
received 2% of UGC Europe’s equity.
II-67
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
On December 18, 2003, UGC completed its offer to exchange
its Class A common stock for the outstanding shares of UGC
Europe common stock that it did not already own. Upon completion
of the exchange offer, UGC owned 92.7% of the outstanding shares
of UGC Europe common stock. On December 19, 2003, UGC
effected a “short-form” merger with UGC Europe. In the
short-form merger, each share of UGC Europe common stock not
tendered in the exchange offer was converted into the right to
receive the same consideration offered in the exchange offer,
and UGC acquired the remaining 7.3% of UGC Europe. In connection
with UGC’s acquisition of the minority interest in UGC
Europe, we calculated a $680,488,000 gain due to the dilutive
effect on our investment in UGC and the implied per share value
of the exchange offer. However, as we had suspended recording
losses of UGC in 2002 and these suspended losses exceeded the
aforementioned gain, we did not recognize the gain in our
consolidated financial statements.
As discussed in detail in note 5, on January 5, 2004,
we completed a transaction pursuant to which we gained voting
control of UGC. Accordingly, UGC has been accounted for as a
consolidated subsidiary and included in our financial position
and results of operations since January 1, 2004.
Summarized financial information for UGC as of December 31,
2003 and for 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
622,321 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,342,743 |
|
|
Intangible and other assets, net
|
|
|
3,134,607 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
7,099,671 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Debt, including liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
$ |
4,351,905 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,252,513 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
22,761 |
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
1,472,492 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$ |
7,099,671 |
|
| |
|
|
|
II-68
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
1,891,530 |
|
|
|
1,515,021 |
|
|
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(1,262,648 |
) |
|
|
(1,218,647 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(808,663 |
) |
|
|
(730,001 |
) |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets, restructuring charges and
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(476,233 |
) |
|
|
(465,655 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating loss
|
|
|
(656,014 |
) |
|
|
(899,282 |
) |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(327,132 |
) |
|
|
(680,101 |
) |
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
2,183,997 |
|
|
|
2,208,782 |
|
|
Share of earnings (losses) of affiliates
|
|
|
294,464 |
|
|
|
(72,142 |
) |
|
Foreign currency transaction gains, net
|
|
|
153,808 |
|
|
|
485,938 |
|
|
Minority interest in losses (earnings) of subsidiaries
|
|
|
183,182 |
|
|
|
(67,103 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
163,063 |
|
|
|
12,176 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1,995,368 |
|
|
|
988,268 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) Other Investments
The following table sets forth the carrying amount of our other
investments:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
ABC Family
|
|
$ |
387,380 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
SBS Broadcasting S.A. (SBS)
|
|
|
241,500 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
News Corp.
|
|
|
102,630 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Sky Latin America
|
|
|
85,846 |
|
|
|
94,347 |
|
|
Telewest Global, Inc., the successor to Telewest Communications
plc (Telewest)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
281,392 |
|
|
Cable Partners Europe (CPE)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
74,068 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21,252 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total other investments
|
|
$ |
838,608 |
|
|
|
450,134 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our investments in ABC Family, SBS and News Corp. are all
accounted for as available-for-sale securities. We accounted for
our investments in Telewest and CPE as available-for-sale
securities during the periods in which we held those investments.
At December 31, 2004, we owned a 99.9% beneficial interest
in 345,000 shares of the 9% Series A preferred stock of ABC
Family with an aggregate liquidation value of $345 million.
The issuer is required to redeem the ABC Family preferred stock
at its liquidation value on August 1, 2027, and has the
option to redeem the ABC Family preferred stock at its
liquidation value at any time after August 1, 2007. We have
the right to require
II-69
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
the issuer to redeem the ABC Family preferred stock at its
liquidation value during the 30 day periods commencing upon
August 2 of the years 2017 and 2022. Liberty contributed this
interest to our company in connection with the spin off. We
recognized dividend income on the ABC Family preferred stock of
$18,217,000 during the period from the Spin Off Date through
December 31, 2004.
At December 31, 2004, UGC owned 6,000,000 shares or
approximately 19% of the outstanding shares of SBS, a European
commercial television and radio broadcasting company. UGC
records these marketable equity securities at fair value using
quoted market prices.
Liberty contributed 10,000,000 shares of News Corp. Class A
common stock to our company in connection with the spin off.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we sold 4,500,000 shares of
News Corp. Class A common stock for aggregate cash proceeds
of $83,669,000 ($29,770,000 of which was received in 2005),
resulting in a pre-tax gain of $37,174,000. Accordingly, we
owned 5,500,000 shares of News Corp. Class A common stock
at December 31, 2004.
Prior to October 2004, we held a 10% ownership interest in each
of three direct-to-home satellite providers that operate in
Brazil (Sky Brasil), Mexico (Sky Mexico) and Chile and Colombia
(Sky Multi-Country) (collectively, Sky Latin America), which
were accounted for as cost investments. Prior to August 2004, we
also held an investment in public debt securities issued by Sky
Brasil and accounted for this investment as an
available-for-sale security.
In October 2004, we sold our interest in the Sky Multi-Country
DTH platform in exchange for reimbursement by the purchaser of
$1,500,000 of funding provided by us in the previous few months
and the release from certain guarantees described below. We were
deemed to owe the purchaser $6,000,000 in respect of the Sky
Multi-Country platform, which amount was offset against a
separate payment we received from the purchaser as explained
below. We also agreed to sell our interest in the Sky Brasil DTH
platform and granted the purchaser an option to purchase our
interest in the Sky Mexico DTH platform.
On October 28, 2004, we received $54 million in cash
from the purchaser, which consisted of $60 million
consideration payable for our Sky Brasil interest less the
$6 million we were deemed to owe the purchaser in respect
of the Sky Multi-Country DTH platform. The $60 million is
refundable by us if the Sky Brasil transaction is terminated. It
may be terminated by us or the purchaser if it has not closed by
October 8, 2007 or by the purchaser if certain conditions
are incapable of being satisfied.
We will receive $88 million in cash upon the transfer of
our Sky Mexico interest to the purchaser. The Sky Mexico
interest will not be transferred until certain Mexican
regulatory conditions are satisfied. If the purchaser does not
exercise its option to purchase our Sky Mexico interest on or
before October 8, 2006 (or in some cases an earlier date),
then we have the right to require the purchaser to purchase our
interest if certain conditions, including the absence of Mexican
regulatory prohibition of the transaction, have been satisfied
or waived.
In light of the contingencies involved, we have not treated
either of the Sky Mexico or Sky Brasil transactions as a sale
for accounting purposes until such time as the necessary
regulatory approvals are obtained and, in the case of Sky
Mexico, the cash is received.
II-70
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
In connection with these transactions our guarantees of the
obligations of the Sky Multi-Country, Sky Brasil and Sky Mexico
platforms under certain transponder leases were terminated and
the purchaser agreed to obtain releases of our guarantees of
obligations under certain equipment leases no later than
December 31, 2004. All but one of such guarantees have been
released. The purchaser has agreed to indemnify us for any
amounts we are required to pay under our remaining guarantee
until such guarantee is terminated.
In 2002, we determined that due to, among other factors,
economic conditions in the countries in which Sky Latin America
operates, our investment in Sky Latin America experienced an
other-than-temporary decline in value. As a result, the
investment in each of the Sky Latin America entities was
adjusted to its respective fair value based on a discounted cash
flow model and per subscriber values. In the case of Sky
Multi-Country, we determined that because of low subscriber
counts, lack of economies of scale and the future projected cash
needs of Sky Multi-Country, the entire investment should be
written off at December 31, 2002. In addition, all amounts
funded to Sky Multi-Country in 2003 were expensed when paid. The
total amount of impairment for Sky Latin America in 2003 and
2002 was $6,884,000 and $105,250,000, respectively.
During 2002, we purchased $370,177,000 and £67,222,000
($128,965,000) of Telewest bonds for cash proceeds of
$204,087,000. At December 31, 2002, we determined that the
Telewest bonds had experienced an other-than-temporary decline
in value. As a result, the carrying values of the Telewest bonds
were adjusted to their respective estimated fair values based on
quoted market prices at the balance sheet date, and LMC
recognized an other-than-temporary decline in value of
$141,271,000.
On July 19, 2004, our investment in Telewest Communications
plc Senior Notes and Senior Discount Notes was converted into
18,417,883 shares or approximately 7.5% of the issued and
outstanding common stock of Telewest. In connection with this
transaction, we recognized a pre-tax gain of $168,301,000,
representing the excess of the fair value of the Telewest common
stock received over our cost basis in the Senior Notes and
Senior Discount Notes. During the third and fourth quarters of
2004, we sold all of the acquired Telewest shares for aggregate
cash proceeds of $215,708,000, resulting in a pre-tax loss of
$16,407,000. Based on our third quarter 2004 determination that
we would dispose of all remaining Telewest shares during the
fourth quarter of 2004, the $12,429,000 excess of the carrying
value over the fair value of the Telewest shares that we held as
of September 30, 2004 was included in other-than-temporary
declines in fair values of investments in our consolidated
statement of operations. Consistent with our classification of
the Senior Notes and Senior Discount Notes and the Telewest
common stock as available-for-sale securities, the
above-described gains and losses were reflected as components of
our accumulated other comprehensive loss account prior to their
reclassification into our consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains and losses |
Unrealized holding gains and losses related to investments in
available-for-sale securities that are included in accumulated
other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax, are summarized
as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Equity | |
|
Debt | |
|
Equity | |
|
Debt | |
| |
|
securities | |
|
securities | |
|
securities | |
|
securities | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Gross unrealized holding gains
|
|
$ |
92,195 |
|
|
|
18,516 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
210,925 |
|
|
Gross unrealized holding losses
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
II-71
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
(8) Derivative
Instruments
The following table provides detail of the fair value of our
derivative instrument assets (liabilities), net:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Foreign exchange derivatives
|
|
$ |
(5,305 |
) |
|
|
(18,594 |
) |
|
Total return debt swaps
|
|
|
23,731 |
|
|
|
22,983 |
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Cross-currency and interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(25,648 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Variable forward transaction
|
|
|
(3,305 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Call agreements on LMI Series A common stock
|
|
|
49,218 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
41,075 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current asset
|
|
$ |
73,507 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Current liability
|
|
|
(14,636 |
) |
|
|
(21,010 |
) |
|
Long-term asset
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
22,983 |
|
|
Long-term liability
|
|
|
(20,364 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
41,075 |
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative
instruments are comprised of the following amounts:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Foreign exchange derivatives
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
(22,626 |
) |
|
|
(11,239 |
) |
|
Total return debt swaps
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
37,804 |
|
|
|
(1,088 |
) |
|
Cross-currency and interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(43,779 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
(20,318 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Variable forward transaction
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Call agreements on LMI Series A common stock
|
|
|
1,713 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
(2,416 |
) |
|
|
(4,378 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
(54,947 |
) |
|
|
12,762 |
|
|
|
(16,705 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Contracts |
We generally do not enter into derivative transactions that are
designed to reduce our long-term exposure to foreign currency
exchange risk. However, in order to reduce our foreign currency
exchange risk related to our cash balances that are denominated
in Japanese yen and our investment in J-COM, we have entered
into collar agreements with respect to ¥15 billion
($146,470,000). These collar agreements have a weighted average
remaining term of approximately
21/2 months,
an average call price of ¥105/U.S. dollar and an average
put price of ¥109/U.S. dollar. In the past, we have also
entered into forward sales contracts with respect to the
Japanese yen. During 2004, we paid $17,001,000 to settle yen
forward sales and collar contracts.
II-72
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
At December 31, 2004, we were a party to total return debt
swaps in connection with (i) bank debt of a subsidiary of
UPC, and (ii) public debt of Cablevisión S.A.
(Cablevisión), the largest cable television company in
Argentina, in terms of basic cable subscribers. Through
March 2, 2005, Liberty owned an indirect 78.2% economic and
non-voting interest in a limited liability company that owns 50%
of the outstanding capital stock of Cablevisión. Under the
total return debt swaps, a counterparty purchases a specified
amount of the underlying debt security for the benefit of our
company. We have posted collateral with the counterparties equal
to 30% of the counterparty’s purchase price for the
purchased indebtedness of the UPC subsidiary and 90% of the
counterparty’s purchase price for the purchased
indebtedness of Cablevisión. We record a derivative asset
equal to the posted collateral and such asset is included in
other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. We
earn interest income based upon the face amount and stated
interest rate of the underlying debt securities, and pay
interest expense at market rates on the amount funded by the
counterparty. In the event the fair value of the underlying
purchased indebtedness of the UPC subsidiary declines by 10% or
more, we are required to post cash collateral for the decline,
and we record an unrealized loss on derivative instruments. The
cash collateral related to the UPC subsidiary indebtedness is
further adjusted up or down for subsequent changes in the fair
value of the underlying indebtedness or for foreign currency
exchange rate movements involving the euro and U.S. dollar.
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we received cash proceeds of
$35,800,000 in connection with the termination of a portion of
the UPC total return swap related to the debt of the UPC
subsidiary. At December 31, 2004, the aggregate purchase
price of debt securities underlying our total return debt swap
arrangements involving the indebtedness of the UPC subsidiary
and Cablevisión was $29,532,000. As of such date, we had
posted cash collateral equal to $19,868,000 ($2,930,000 with
respect to the UPC subsidiary and $16,938,000 with respect to
Cablevisión). If the fair value of the purchased debt
securities had been zero at December 31, 2004, we would
have been required to post additional cash collateral of
$8,972,000.
During the first quarter of 2005, we received cash proceeds of
$22,642,000 upon termination of the Cablevisión and UPC
subsidiary total return swaps.
|
|
|
UGC Interest Rate and Cross-currency Derivative
Contracts |
During the first quarter of 2003, UGC purchased interest
rate caps related to the UPC Broadband Bank Facility (see
note 10) that capped the variable Euro Interbank Offered
Rate (EURIBOR) interest rate at 3.0% on a notional amount
of
€2.7 billion
in 2003 and 2004. As UGC was able to fix its variable interest
rates below 3.0% on the UPC Broadband Bank Facility during
2003 and 2004, all of these caps expired without being
exercised. During the first and second quarter of 2004, UGC
purchased interest rate caps for a total of $21,442,000, capping
the variable interest rate at 3.0% and 4.0% in 2005 and 2006,
respectively, on notional amounts totaling
€2.25 billion
to
€2.6 billion.
In June 2003, UGC entered into a cross currency and interest
rate swap pursuant to which a notional amount of
$347.5 million was swapped at an average rate of
1.133 euros per U.S. dollar until July 2005, with the
variable LIBOR interest rate (including margin) swapped into a
fixed interest rate of 7.85%. Following the prepayment of part
of Facility C in December 2004, UGC paid down this swap
with a cash payment of $59,100,000 and unwound a notional amount
of $171,480,000. The remainder of the swap is for a notional
amount of $176,020,000, and the euro to U.S. dollar
exchange rate has been reset at 1.3158 to 1. In connection with
the refinancing of the UPC Broadband Bank Facility in
December 2004, UGC entered into a seven-year cross currency and
interest rate swap pursuant to which a notional amount of
$525 million was swapped at a rate of 1.3342 euros per
U.S. dollar until December 2011, with the variable interest
rate of LIBOR + 300 basis points swapped into a variable
rate of EURIBOR + 310 basis points for the same time period.
II-73
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
|
|
|
Variable Forward Transaction |
Prior to the spin off, Liberty contributed to our company
10,000,000 shares of News Corp. Class A common stock,
together with a related variable forward transaction. In
connection with the sale of 4,500,000 shares of News Corp.
Class A common stock during the fourth quarter of 2004, we
paid $3,429,000 to terminate the portion of the variable forward
transaction that related to the shares that were sold. After
giving effect to the fourth quarter termination transaction, the
forward, which expires on September 17, 2009, provides
(i) us with the right to effectively require the
counterparty to buy 5,500,000 News Corp. Class A
common stock at a price of $15.72 per share, or an
aggregate price of $86,460,000 (the Floor Price), and
(ii) the counterparty with the effective right to require
us to sell 5,500,000 shares of News Corp. Class A
common stock at a price of $26.19 per share.
At any time during the term of the forward, we can require the
counterparty to advance the full Floor Price. Provided we do not
draw an aggregate amount in excess of the present value of the
Floor Price, as determined in accordance with the forward, we
may elect to draw such amounts on a discounted or undiscounted
basis. As long as the aggregate advances are not in excess of
the present value of the Floor Price, undiscounted advances will
bear interest at prevailing three-month LIBOR and discounted
advances will not bear interest. Amounts advanced up to the
present value of the Floor Price are secured by the underlying
shares of News Corp. Class A common stock. If we elect to
draw amounts in excess of the present value of the Floor Price,
those amounts will be unsecured and will bear interest at a
negotiated interest rate. During the third quarter of 2004, we
received undiscounted advances aggregating $126,000,000 under
the forward. Such advances were subsequently repaid during the
quarter.
|
|
|
Call Agreements on LMI Series A common stock |
During the fourth quarter of 2004, we entered into call option
contracts pursuant to which we contemporaneously (i) sold
call options on 1,210,000 shares of LMI Series A
common stock at exercise prices ranging from $39.5236 to
$41.7536, and (ii) purchased call options on
1,210,000 shares with an exercise price of zero. As
structured with the counterparty, these instruments have similar
financial mechanics to prepaid put option contracts. Under the
terms of the contracts, we can elect cash or physical
settlement. All of the contracts expired during the first
quarter of 2005 and were settled for cash.
(9) Long-lived Assets
The details of property and equipment and the related
accumulated depreciation are set forth below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Cable distribution systems
|
|
$ |
5,280,307 |
|
|
|
116,962 |
|
|
Support equipment, buildings and land
|
|
|
23,601 |
|
|
|
11,051 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
5,303,908 |
|
|
|
128,013 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,000,809 |
) |
|
|
(30,436 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
$ |
4,303,099 |
|
|
|
97,577 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2004, UGC recorded an impairment of
$16,111,000 on certain tangible fixed assets of its wholly owned
subsidiary, Priority Telecom. The impairment assessment was
triggered by
II-74
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
competitive factors in 2004 that led to a greater than expected
price erosion and the inability to reach forecasted market
share. Fair value of the tangible assets was estimated using a
discounted cash flow analysis, along with other available market
data. In the fourth quarter of 2004, UGC recorded an impairment
of $10,955,000 related to certain tangible fixed assets in The
Netherlands. In addition, during 2004 UGC recorded several minor
impairments for long-lived assets which had no future service
potential due to changes in management’s plans.
Depreciation expense related to our property and equipment was
$894,789,000, $14,642,000 and $13,037,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for 2004 were as
follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Release of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
pre- | |
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
acquisition | |
|
|
|
currency | |
|
|
| |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
valuation | |
|
|
|
translation | |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
allowance | |
|
Impairments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
680,349 |
|
|
|
(6,374 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
55,960 |
|
|
|
729,935 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
460,810 |
|
|
|
(2,893 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
37,416 |
|
|
|
495,333 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
506,854 |
|
|
|
(34,133 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
56,869 |
|
|
|
529,590 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
191,785 |
|
|
|
(4,575 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,876 |
|
|
|
199,086 |
|
|
J-COM
|
|
|
203,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
203,000 |
|
|
All other
|
|
|
322,576 |
|
|
|
211,590 |
|
|
|
(10,105 |
) |
|
|
(29,000 |
) |
|
|
15,274 |
|
|
|
510,335 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total LMI
|
|
$ |
525,576 |
|
|
|
2,051,388 |
|
|
|
(58,080 |
) |
|
|
(29,000 |
) |
|
|
177,395 |
|
|
|
2,667,279 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2004, we recorded a $26,000,000 impairment of certain
enterprise level goodwill associated with Pramer and a
$3,000,000 impairment of the enterprise level goodwill
associated with one or our equity affiliates. The impairment
assessment for Pramer was triggered by our determination that it
was more-likely-than-not that we will sell Pramer.
Accordingly, the fair value used to assess the recoverability of
the enterprise level goodwill associated with Pramer was based
on the value that we would expect to receive upon any sale of
Pramer.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, UGC reversed
valuation allowances for deferred tax assets in various tax
jurisdictions due to the realization or expected realization of
tax benefits from these assets. The valuation allowances were
originally recorded as part of the purchase accounting
adjustments related to the UGC Founders Transaction and the UGC
Europe exchange offer and merger and were therefore reversed
against goodwill.
Prior to January 1, 2004, when we began consolidating UGC,
all of our goodwill was enterprise level goodwill. During 2002
we recorded impairment charges aggregating $45,928,000 to reduce
the carrying value of the enterprise level goodwill, including
$39,000,000 related to our investment in Metrópolis (see
note 6). There were no changes in our goodwill balances
during 2003.
II-75
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
|
|
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization, Net |
The details of our amortizable intangible assets are set forth
below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Gross carrying amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$ |
426,213 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
31,420 |
|
|
|
6,083 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
457,633 |
|
|
|
6,083 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$ |
(71,311 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(3,723 |
) |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
(75,034 |
) |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$ |
354,902 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
27,697 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
382,599 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets with finite useful lives was
$66,099,000 and $472,000 in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Based
on our current amortizable intangible assets, we expect that
amortization expense will be as follows for the next five years
and thereafter (amounts in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
78,803 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
73,235 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
68,935 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
65,601 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
65,601 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
30,424 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
382,599 |
|
| |
|
|
|
II-76
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
(10) Debt
The components of debt were as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
UPC Broadband Bank Facility
|
|
$ |
3,927,830 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
UGC Convertible Notes
|
|
|
681,850 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other UGC debt
|
|
|
269,269 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other subsidiary debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
139,838 |
|
|
|
54,126 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total debt
|
|
|
5,018,787 |
|
|
|
54,126 |
|
|
Current maturities
|
|
|
(36,827 |
) |
|
|
(12,426 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total long-term debt
|
|
$ |
4,981,960 |
|
|
|
41,700 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UPC Broadband Bank Facility |
The UPC Broadband Bank Facility is the senior secured credit
facility of UPC Broadband Holding B.V. (UPC Broadband), formerly
known as UPC Distribution Holding B.V., an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of UPC. The UPC Broadband Bank Facility, originally
executed in October 2000, is secured by the assets of UPC
Broadband’s majority-owned operating companies, and is
senior to other long-term debt obligations of UPC.
The indenture governing the UPC Broadband Bank Facility contains
covenants that limit among other things, UPC Broadband’s
ability to merge with or into another company, acquire other
companies, incur additional debt, dispose of any assets unless
in the ordinary course of business, enter or guarantee a loan
and enter into a hedging arrangement. The indenture also
restricts UPC Broadband from transferring funds to its parent
company (and indirectly to UGC) through loans, advances or
dividends. If a change of control exists with respect to
UGC’s ownership of UGC Europe, UGC Europe’s ownership
of UPC Broadband or UPC Broadband’s ownership of its
respective subsidiaries, the facility agent may cancel each
Facility and demand full payment. The covenants also provide for
the following ratios (which vary depending on the period used
for the calculation): (i) senior debt to annualized
earnings before interest taxes and depreciation, as defined in
the indenture for the UPC Broadband Bank Facility,
(EBITDA) ranging from 4.00:1 to 7.75:1 (ii) EBITDA to
total cash ranging from 2.00:1 to 3.00:1 (iii) EBITDA to
senior debt service ranging from 0.65:1 to 2.25:1
(iv) EBITDA to senior interest ranging from 2.10:1 to
3.40:1; and (v) total debt to annualized EBITDA ranging
from 5.75:1 to 7.50:1.
In January 2004, the UPC Broadband Bank Facility was amended to
permit indebtedness under a new tranche (Facility D). Facility D
had substantially the same terms as the then existing
facilities, and consisted of five different tranches totaling
€1.072 billion
($1.462 billion). The proceeds of Facility D were limited
in use to fund the scheduled payments of Facility B between
December 2004 and December 2006.
In June 2004, UPC Broadband amended the UPC Broadband Bank
Facility to add a new Facility E term loan to replace the
undrawn Facility D term loan. Proceeds from Facility E totaled
€1.022 billion
($1.394 billion), which, in conjunction with cash
contributed indirectly by us, was used to: (i) repay some
of the indebtedness borrowed under the other Facilities;
(ii) redeem the UPC Polska senior notes due 2007; and
(iii) provide funding for the Noos Acquisition.
In December 2004, the UPC Broadband Bank Facility was amended to
add a new Facility F term loan that: (i) increased the
average debt maturity under the UPC Broadband Bank Facility;
(ii) increased the available
II-77
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
liquidity under the Facility; and (iii) reduced the average
interest margin under the Facility. The amendment consisted of a
$525,000,000 tranche and a
€140,000,000
($190,918,000) tranche, totaling
€535,019,000
($729,605,000) in gross borrowings. The proceeds from these
borrowings were applied to: (i) repay
€245,000,000
($334,106,000) under Facility A (representing all then
outstanding amounts); (ii) prepay
€101,224,000
($138,039,000) of Facility B that were scheduled to mature in
June 2006; (iii) prepay
€177,013,000
($241,393,000) of Facility C; and (iv) pay transaction fees
of €11,782,000
($16,067,000).
The following table provides detail of the UPC Broadband Bank
Facility:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| Facility |
|
Currency | |
|
Euros | |
|
US dollars | |
|
Euros | |
|
US dollars | |
|
Interest rate(3) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
|
|
A(1)(2)
|
|
|
Euro |
|
|
|
€ — |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
€ 230,000 |
|
|
$ |
289,946 |
|
|
EURIBOR +
2.25% — 4.0% |
|
B(1)
|
|
|
Euro |
|
|
|
1,160,026 |
|
|
|
1,581,927 |
|
|
|
2,333,250 |
|
|
|
2,941,380 |
|
|
EURIBOR +
2.25% — 4.0% |
|
C1
|
|
|
Euro |
|
|
|
44,338 |
|
|
|
60,464 |
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
119,760 |
|
|
|
EURIBOR +
5.5% |
|
|
C2
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
176,020 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
347,500 |
|
|
|
LIBOR +
5.5% |
|
|
E
|
|
|
Euro |
|
|
|
1,021,853 |
|
|
|
1,393,501 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
EURIBOR +
3.0% |
|
|
F1(1)
|
|
|
Euro |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
190,918 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
EURIBOR +
3.25% — 4.0% |
|
F2(1)
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
525,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
LIBOR +
3.00% — 3.5% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
€2,366,217 |
|
|
$ |
3,927,830 |
|
|
|
€2,658,250 |
|
|
$ |
3,698,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
The interest rate margin is variable based on certain leverage
ratios. |
| |
| (2) |
Facility A is a revolving credit facility that has availability
of €666,750,000
($909,247,000) as of December 31, 2004, which can be used
to finance additional permitted acquisitions and/or to refinance
indebtedness, subject to covenant compliance. Facility A
provides for an annual commitment fee of 0.5% for the unused
portion of this facility. |
| |
| (3) |
As of December 31, 2004, six month EURIBOR and LIBOR rates
were approximately 2.2% and 2.8%, respectively. The
weighted-average interest rate on all Facilities in 2004 was
approximately 6.0%. |
On March 8, 2005, the UPC Broadband Bank Facility was
further amended to permit indebtedness under: (i) Facility
G, a new
€1.0 billion
term loan facility maturing in full on April 1, 2010;
(ii) Facility H, a new
€1.5 billion
($2.05 billion) term loan facility maturing in full on
September 1, 2012, of which $1.25 billion was
denominated in U.S. dollars and then swapped into euros through
a 7.5 year cross-currency swap; and (iii) Facility I,
a new
€500 million
($682 million) revolving credit facility maturing in full
on April 1, 2010. In connection with this amendment,
€167 million
($228 million) of Facility A, the existing revolving credit
facility, was cancelled, reducing Facility A to a maximum amount
of
€500 million
($682 million). The proceeds from Facilities G and H were
used primarily to prepay all amounts outstanding under existing
term loan Facilities B, C and E, to fund certain acquisitions
and pay transaction fees. The aggregate availability of
€1.0 billion
($1.36 billion) under Facilities A and I can be used to
fund acquisitions and for general corporate purposes. As a
result of this amendment, the weighted average maturity of the
UPC Broadband Bank Facility
II-78
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
was extended from approximately 4 years to approximately
6 years, with no amortization payments required until 2010,
and the weighted average interest margin on the UPC Broadband
Bank Facility was reduced by approximately 0.25% per annum. The
amendment also provided for additional flexibility on certain
covenants and the funding of acquisitions.
On April 6, 2004, UGC completed the offering and sale of
€500 million
($604,595,000 based on the April 6, 2004 exchange rate)
13/4%
euro-denominated convertible senior notes (the UGC Convertible
Notes) due April 15, 2024. Interest is payable
semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning
October 15, 2004. The UGC Convertible Notes are senior
unsecured obligations that rank equally in right of payment with
all of UGC’s existing and future senior unsubordinated and
unsecured indebtedness and ranks senior in right to all of
UGC’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The
UGC Convertible Notes are effectively subordinated to all
existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of
UGC’s subsidiaries. The indenture governing the UGC
Convertible Notes (the Indenture) does not contain any financial
or operating covenants. The UGC Convertible Notes may be
redeemed at UGC’s option, in whole or in part, on or after
April 20, 2011 at a redemption price in euros equal to 100%
of the principal amount, together with accrued and unpaid
interest. Holders of the UGC Convertible Notes have the right to
tender all or part of their notes for purchase by UGC on
April 15, 2011, April 15, 2014 and April 15,
2019, for a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal
amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If a change in control
(as defined in the Indenture) has occurred, each holder of the
UGC Convertible Notes may require UGC to purchase their notes,
in whole or in part, at a price equal to 100% of the principal
amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The UGC Convertible
Notes are convertible into 51,250,000 shares of UGC Class A
common stock at an initial conversion price of
€9.7561 per
share, which was equivalent to a conversion price of $12.00 per
share and a conversion rate of 102.5 shares per
€1,000 principal
amount of the UGC Convertible Notes on the date of issue.
Holders of the UGC Convertible Notes may surrender their notes
for conversion prior to maturity in the following circumstances:
(i) the price of UGC Class A common stock issuable
upon conversion of a UGC Convertible Note reaches a specified
threshold, (ii) UGC has called the UGC Convertible Notes
for redemption, (iii) the trading price for the UGC
Convertible Notes falls below a specified threshold or
(iv) UGC makes certain distributions to holders of UGC
Class A common stock or specified corporate transactions
occur.
VTR Bank Facility. On December 17, 2004, VTR
completed the refinancing of its existing bank facility with a
new Chilean peso-denominated six-year amortizing term senior
secured credit facility (the VTR Bank Facility at
December 17, 2004). The facility consists of two tranches
— a 54.7675 billion Chilean peso ($95 million at
December 17, 2004) committed Tranche A and an
uncommitted Tranche B. At December 31, 2004, the U.S.
dollar equivalent of the amount outstanding under Tranche A
of the VTR Bank Facility was $97,941,000. The VTR Bank Facility
bears interest at variable rates (5.19% at December 31,
2004) that are subject to reduction depending on VTR’s
solvency rating and debt to EBITDA ratio. The VTR Bank Facility
is secured by VTR’s assets and the assets and capital stock
of its subsidiaries, is senior to the subordinated debt owed to
UGC and ranks pari passu to future senior indebtedness of VTR.
The VTR Bank Facility credit agreement contains customary
financial covenants and allows for the distribution by VTR of
certain restricted payments, such as dividends to its
shareholders, as long as no default exists under the facility
and VTR maintains certain minimum levels of cash. VTR is in
compliance with its loan covenants.
InvestCos Notes (Telenet). At December 31, 2004,
UGC’s debt included $87,821,000 related to mandatorily
redeemable securities of the InvestCos, the consolidated
subsidiaries of UGC that own a direct investment in
II-79
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Telenet. These securities are subject to mandatory redemption on
March 30, 2050. Upon an initial public offering of Telenet
or the occurrence of certain other events, these securities will
become immediately redeemable. Given the mandatory redemption
feature, UGC has classified these securities as debt and has
recorded these securities at their estimated fair value at
December 31, 2004 in conjunction with the preliminary
purchase price allocation for the acquisition of Belgium Cable
Investors and its indirect interest in Telenet. See note 6.
Once the purchase price allocation is finalized, subsequent
changes in fair value will be reported in earnings.
UPC Polska Notes. UPC Polska, Inc. (UPC Polska) is an
indirect subsidiary of UGC. On February 18, 2004, in
connection with the consummation of UPC Polska’s plan of
reorganization and emergence from its U.S. bankruptcy
proceeding, third-party holders of UPC Polska Notes and other
claimholders received a total of $87,361,000 in cash,
$101,701,000 in new 9% UPC Polska Notes due 2007 and
approximately 2,011,813 shares of UGC Class A common stock
in exchange for the cancellation of their claims. UGC recognized
a gain of $31,916,000 from the extinguishment of the UPC Polska
Notes and other liabilities subject to compromise, equal to the
excess of their respective carrying amounts over the fair value
of consideration given. During 2004, UPC Polska incurred costs
associated with its reorganization aggregating $5,951,000. Such
costs are included in other income (expense), net in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations. As noted
above, UGC redeemed the new 9% UPC Polska Notes due 2007 for a
cash payment of $101,701,000 during the third quarter of 2004.
Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico. On December 23,
2004, Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico completed the refinancing
of its existing bank facility with a new $140 million
facility consisting of a $125 million six-year term loan
facility and a $15 million six-year revolving credit
facility (the Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico Facility). In
connection with the closing of the Liberty Cablevision Puerto
Rico Facility, (i) Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico made a
$63,500,000 cash distribution to our company and (ii) the
$50,542,000 cash collateral for Liberty Cablevision Puerto
Rico’s previous bank facility was released to our company.
At December 31, 2004, the aggregate amount outstanding
under this facility was $127,500,000. The Liberty Cablevision
Puerto Rico Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a 2.25% margin
(5.0% at December 31, 2004). The LIBOR margin is subject to
reduction depending on Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico’s
debt to EBITDA ratio, as defined by the Liberty Cablevision
Puerto Rico Facility. The Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico
Facility is secured by a pledge of the capital stock of Liberty
Cablevision Puerto Rico and by Liberty Cablevision Puerto
Rico’s assets, including the capital stock of its
subsidiaries. The Liberty Cablevision Puerto Rico Facility
contains customary financial covenants.
Pramer. At December 31, 2004, Pramer’s U.S.
dollar denominated bank borrowings aggregated $12,338,000.
During 2002, following the devaluation of the Argentine peso,
Pramer failed to make certain required payments due under its
bank credit facility, resulting in a technical default. However,
the bank lenders did not provide notice of default or request
acceleration of the payments due under the facility. On December
29, 2004, Pramer and the banks signed definitive documents for
the refinancing of this credit facility (the New Pramer
Facility) and the closing occurred on January 28, 2005. At
closing, Pramer made an approximate $1.8 million payment to
the banks. The remaining outstanding principal of
$10.5 million amortizes over the next 4 years. The New
Pramer Facility is denominated in U.S. dollars and bears
interest at LIBOR plus a 3.5% margin during 2005 (6.1% at
January 28, 2005). The LIBOR margin is subject to annual
increases of 0.5% per year. The New Pramer Facility credit
agreement contains customary financial covenants.
II-80
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Our debt maturities for the next five years and thereafter are
as follows (amounts in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
36,827 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
571,464 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
745,004 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
588,484 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,533,182 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,543,826 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Total Debt
|
|
$ |
5,018,787 |
|
| |
|
|
|
We believe that the fair value and the carrying value of our
debt were approximately equal at December 31, 2004.
(11) Income Taxes
Prior to the Spin Off Date, LMC International and its
80%-or-more-owned domestic subsidiaries (the LMC International
Tax Group) are included in the consolidated federal and state
income tax returns of Liberty. LMC International’s income
taxes included those items in the consolidated income tax
calculation applicable to the LMC International Tax Group
(intercompany tax allocation) and any taxes on income of LMC
International’s consolidated foreign or domestic
subsidiaries that are excluded from the consolidated federal and
state income tax returns of Liberty. The intercompany tax
amounts owed to Liberty as a result of these allocations were
contributed to our equity in connection with the spin off.
In connection with the spin off, LMI (together with its
80%-or-more-owned domestic subsidiaries, the LMI Tax Group),
(i) became a separate tax paying entity, and
(ii) entered into a Tax Sharing Agreement with Liberty.
Under the Tax Sharing Agreement, Liberty is responsible for U.S.
federal, state, local and foreign income taxes reported on a
consolidated, combined or unitary return that includes the LMI
Tax Group, on the one hand, and Liberty or one of its
subsidiaries on the other hand, subject to certain limited
exceptions. We are responsible for all other taxes that are
attributable to the LMI Tax Group, whether accruing before, on
or after the spin off. The Tax Sharing Agreement requires that
we will not take, or fail to take, any action where such action,
or failure to act, would be inconsistent with or prohibit the
spin off from qualifying as a tax-free transaction. Moreover, we
will indemnify Liberty for any loss resulting from such action
or failure to act, if such action or failure to act precludes
the spin off from qualifying as a tax-free transaction.
As a result of the LMI Tax Group becoming a separate tax paying
entity in connection with the spin off, we re-evaluated the
estimated blended state tax rate used to compute certain of our
deferred tax balances, and concluded that our estimate of this
blended state tax rate should be reduced. As a result, we
recorded a $22,938,000 deferred tax benefit during the third
quarter of 2004 to reflect the impact of the reduced rate on our
net deferred tax liabilities.
II-81
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Income tax benefit (expense) consists of:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Current | |
|
Deferred | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Federal
|
|
$ |
(51,851 |
) |
|
|
75,974 |
|
|
|
24,123 |
|
| |
State and local
|
|
|
(4,554 |
) |
|
|
13,694 |
|
|
|
9,140 |
|
| |
Foreign
|
|
|
(10,295 |
) |
|
|
(5,519 |
) |
|
|
(15,814 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
(66,700 |
) |
|
|
84,149 |
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Federal
|
|
$ |
14,774 |
|
|
|
(28,630 |
) |
|
|
(13,856 |
) |
| |
State and local
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(5,589 |
) |
|
|
(5,589 |
) |
| |
Foreign
|
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
(8,059 |
) |
|
|
(8,530 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
14,303 |
|
|
|
(42,278 |
) |
|
|
(27,975 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Federal
|
|
$ |
(3,988 |
) |
|
|
140,533 |
|
|
|
136,545 |
|
| |
State and local
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
26,527 |
|
|
|
26,527 |
|
| |
Foreign
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
2,546 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
(3,485 |
) |
|
|
169,606 |
|
|
|
166,121 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) attributable to our
company’s pre-tax loss or earnings differs from the amounts
computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%, as
a result of the following:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Computed “expected” tax benefit (expense)
|
|
$ |
80,110 |
|
|
|
(17,111 |
) |
|
|
173,593 |
|
|
State and local income taxes, net of federal income taxes
|
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(4,315 |
) |
|
|
15,472 |
|
|
Foreign taxes
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
(7,922 |
) |
|
|
1,841 |
|
|
Enacted tax law changes, case law and rate changes
|
|
|
(149,294 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
107,863 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Losses on sale of investments, affiliates and other assets
|
|
|
78,693 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Non-deductible interest and other expenses
|
|
|
(68,497 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,153 |
) |
|
Non-deductible or taxable foreign currency exchange results
|
|
|
(36,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income recognized for tax purposes, but not for financial
reporting purposes
|
|
|
(25,820 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,679 |
) |
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(22,131 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Change in estimated blended state tax rate
|
|
|
22,938 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Non-taxable investment income
|
|
|
20,481 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
International rate differences
|
|
|
6,511 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
4,252 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
(5,953 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
|
(27,975 |
) |
|
|
166,121 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-82
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
The current and non-current components of our deferred tax
assets (liabilities) are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
38,355 |
|
|
|
9,697 |
|
|
Non-current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
77,313 |
|
|
|
583,945 |
|
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(458,138 |
) |
|
|
(135,811 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Deferred tax assets (liabilities), net
|
|
$ |
(342,470 |
) |
|
|
457,831 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our deferred income tax valuation allowance increased
$2,281,253,000 in 2004, including a $22,131,000 charge to tax
expense, with the remaining net increase resulting from the
January 1, 2004 consolidation of UGC, acquisitions, foreign
currency translation adjustments and other items. Approximately
$546 million of the valuation allowance recorded as of
December 31, 2004 was attributable to deferred tax assets
for which any subsequently recognized tax benefits will be
allocated to reduce goodwill related to various business
combinations.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax
liabilities at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are presented
below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Investments
|
|
$ |
66,862 |
|
|
|
499,214 |
|
| |
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
1,770,957 |
|
|
|
7,263 |
|
| |
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
556,507 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
44,303 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Deferred compensation and severance
|
|
|
41,686 |
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
| |
Other future deductible amounts
|
|
|
100,596 |
|
|
|
8,508 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,580,911 |
|
|
|
522,300 |
|
| |
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,281,253 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
299,658 |
|
|
|
522,300 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Investments
|
|
|
(344,871 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(53,124 |
) |
|
|
(14,749 |
) |
| |
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(127,712 |
) |
|
|
(19,038 |
) |
| |
Unrealized gains on investments
|
|
|
(25,287 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
Other future taxable amounts
|
|
|
(91,134 |
) |
|
|
(30,682 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(642,128 |
) |
|
|
(64,469 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$ |
(342,470 |
) |
|
|
457,831 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-83
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
The significant components of our tax loss carryforwards and
related tax assets are as follows (amounts in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Tax loss | |
|
Related tax | |
|
Expiration | |
| Country |
|
carryforward | |
|
asset | |
|
date | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
France
|
|
$ |
2,425,612 |
|
|
|
835,138 |
|
|
|
Indefinite |
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
|
1,910,476 |
|
|
|
574,542 |
|
|
|
Indefinite |
|
|
Ireland
|
|
|
293,686 |
|
|
|
36,711 |
|
|
|
Indefinite |
|
|
Austria
|
|
|
249,025 |
|
|
|
62,257 |
|
|
|
Indefinite |
|
|
Luxembourg
|
|
|
243,936 |
|
|
|
74,108 |
|
|
|
Indefinite |
|
|
Chile
|
|
|
241,232 |
|
|
|
41,009 |
|
|
|
Indefinite |
|
|
Norway
|
|
|
117,856 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
2007-2012 |
|
|
Poland
|
|
|
69,901 |
|
|
|
13,281 |
|
|
|
2005-2008 |
|
|
United States
|
|
|
23,193 |
|
|
|
8,118 |
|
|
|
2021-2024 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
401,906 |
|
|
|
92,793 |
|
|
|
Various |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
5,976,823 |
|
|
|
1,770,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our tax loss carryforwards in The Netherlands are associated
with various different tax groups, which are limited in their
ability to offset taxable income of other Dutch tax groups. We
intend to indefinitely reinvest earnings from certain foreign
operations except to the extent the earnings are subject to
current U.S. income taxes. Accordingly, U.S. and non-U.S. income
and withholding taxes for which a deferred tax might otherwise
be required have not been provided on a cumulative amount of
temporary differences (including, for this purpose, any
difference between the tax basis in stock of a consolidated
subsidiary and the amount of the subsidiary’s net equity
determined for financial reporting purposes) related to
investments in foreign subsidiaries are estimated to be
approximately $2.7 billion at December 31, 2004. The
determination of the additional U.S. and non-U.S. income and
withholding tax that would arise upon a reversal of the
temporary differences is subject to offset by available foreign
tax credits, subject to certain limitations, and it is
impractical to estimate the amount of income and withholding tax
that might be payable.
Because we do business in foreign countries and have a
controlling interest in most of our subsidiaries, such
subsidiaries are considered to be “controlled foreign
corporations” (“CFC”) under U.S. tax law. In
general, our pro rata share of certain income earned by these
subsidiaries that are CFCs during a taxable year when such
subsidiaries have positive current or accumulated earnings and
profits will be included in our income to the extent of the
earnings and profits when the income is earned, regardless of
whether the income is distributed to us. The income, often
referred to as “Subpart F income,” generally includes,
but is not limited to, such items as interest, dividends,
royalties, gains from the disposition of certain property,
certain exchange gains in excess of exchange losses, and certain
related party sales and services income.
In addition, a U.S. corporation that is a shareholder in a CFC
may be required to include in its income its pro rata share of
the CFC’s increase in the average adjusted tax basis of any
investment in U.S. property held by a wholly or majority owned
CFC to the extent that the CFC has positive current or
accumulated earnings and profits. This is the case even though
the U.S. corporation may not have received any actual cash
distributions from the CFC. Although we intend to take
reasonable tax planning measures to limit our tax exposure,
there can be no assurance we will be able to do so.
II-84
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
In general, a U.S. corporation may claim a foreign tax credit
against its U.S. federal income tax expense for foreign income
taxes paid or accrued. A U.S. corporation may also claim a
credit for foreign income taxes paid or accrued on the earnings
of a foreign corporation paid to the U.S. corporation as a
dividend.
Our ability to claim a foreign tax credit for dividends received
from our foreign subsidiaries or foreign taxes paid or accrued
is subject to various significant limitations under U.S. tax
laws including a limited carry back and carry forward period.
Some of our operating companies are located in countries with
which the United States does not have income tax treaties.
Because we lack treaty protection in these countries, we may be
subject to high rates of withholding taxes on distributions and
other payments from these operating companies and may be subject
to double taxation on our income. Limitations on the ability to
claim a foreign tax credit, lack of treaty protection in some
countries, and the inability to offset losses in one foreign
jurisdiction against income earned in another foreign
jurisdiction could result in a high effective U.S. federal tax
rate on our earnings. Since substantially all of our revenue is
generated abroad, including in jurisdictions that do not have
tax treaties with the U.S., these risks are proportionately
greater for us than for companies that generate most of their
revenue in the U.S. or in jurisdictions that have these treaties.
We, through our subsidiaries, maintain a presence in many
foreign countries. Many of these countries maintain tax regimes
that differ significantly from the system of income taxation
used in the United States. We have accounted for the effect of
foreign taxes based on what we believe is reasonably expected to
apply to us and our subsidiaries based on tax laws currently in
effect and/or reasonable interpretations of these laws. Because
some foreign jurisdictions do not have systems of taxation that
are as well established as the system of income taxation used in
the United States or tax regimes used in other major
industrialized countries, it may be difficult to anticipate how
foreign jurisdictions will tax our and our subsidiaries’
current and future operations.
(12) Stockholders’
Equity
Our authorized capital stock consists of (i) 1,050,000,000
shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of which
500,000,000 shares are designated LMI Series A Common Stock
50,000,000 shares are designated LMI Series B Common Stock
and 500,000,000 shares are designated LMI Series C Common
Stock and (ii) 50,000,000 shares of LMI preferred stock,
par value $.01 per share. LMI’s restated certificate of
incorporation authorizes the board of directors to authorize the
issuance of one or more series of preferred stock.
Under LMI’s restated certificate of incorporation, holders
of LMI Series A common stock are entitled to one vote for each
share of such stock held, and holders of LMI Series B
common stock are entitled to ten votes for each share of such
stock held, on all matters submitted to a vote of LMI
stockholders at any annual or special meeting. Holders of LMI
Series C common stock are not entitled to any voting
powers, except as required by Delaware law (in which case
holders of LMI Series C common stock are entitled to
1/100th of a vote per share).
Each share of LMI Series A common stock is convertible into
one share of LMI Series B common stock. At
December 31, 2004, there were 1,701,538 shares of LMI
Series A common stock and 3,066,716 shares of LMI
Series B common stock reserved for issuance pursuant to
outstanding stock options. In addition to these amounts, one
share of LMI Series A common stock is reserved for issuance
for each share of LMI Series B common stock that is either
issued (7,264,300 shares) or subject to future issuance pursuant
to outstanding stock options (3,066,716 shares).
II-85
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding series of
our preferred stock, the holder of LMI Series A, LMI
Series B and LMI Series C common stock will be entitled to
such dividends as may be declared from time to time by our board
from funds available therefor. Except with respect to certain
share distributions, whenever a dividend is paid to the holder
of one of our series of common stock, we shall also pay to the
holders of the other series of our common stock an equal per
share dividend. Pursuant to the Liberty Global merger agreement,
neither we nor UGC may pay any cash dividends on our respective
common stocks until the mergers contemplated thereby are
completed or the merger agreement is terminated. Except for the
foregoing, there are currently no restrictions on our ability to
pay dividends in cash or stock.
In the event of our liquidation, dissolution and winding up,
after payment or provision for payment of our debts and
liabilities and subject to the prior payment in full of any
preferential amounts to which our preferred stockholders may be
entitled, the holders of LMI Series A, LMI Series B
and LMI Series C common stock will share equally, on a
share for share basis, in our assets remaining for distribution
to the holders of LMI common stock.
On December 7, 2004, we purchased 3,000,000 shares of LMI
Series A common stock from Comcast Corporation in a private
transaction for a cash purchase price of $127,890,000.
|
|
|
Spin Off and LMI Rights Offering |
For information concerning the spin off transaction and the
subsequent LMI Rights Offering, see note 2.
|
|
|
Issuance of Shares by Subsidiaries |
During 2004, we recorded an aggregate increase to additional
paid-in capital of $11,126, 000 as a result of the dilution of
our ownership interest in UGC.
In addition, UGC recorded a loss of approximately
€9,679,000
($11,776,000) associated with the dilution of its ownership
interest in UPC Broadband France as a result of the Noos
transaction. Our $6,102,000 share of this loss is reflected as a
reduction of additional paid-in capital in our consolidated
statement of stockholders’ equity.
At December 31, 2004, approximately $1.8 billion of
our net assets represented net assets of certain of our
subsidiaries that were not available to be transferred to our
company in the form of dividends, loans or advances due to
restrictions contained in the credit facilities of these
subsidiaries.
(13) Stock Incentive
Awards
As discussed in more detail in note 2, certain terms of the
then outstanding LMI stock options were modified in connection
with the LMI Rights Offering. All references herein to the
number of outstanding LMI stock options and the related exercise
prices reflect these modified terms.
As a result of the spin off and related adjustments to
Liberty’s stock incentive awards, options to acquire an
aggregate of 1,595,709 shares of LMI Series A common stock
and 1,498,154 shares of LMI Series B common
II-86
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
stock were issued to our and Liberty’s employees at
exercise prices of $33.92 and $37.88, respectively, pursuant to
the LMI Transitional Stock Adjustment Plan (the Transitional
Plan). Such options have remaining terms and vesting provisions
equivalent to those of the respective Liberty stock incentive
awards that were adjusted. At the spin off date, such options to
purchase shares of LMI Series A common stock had a
remaining weighted average term of 7.03 years and a
remaining weighted average vesting period of 1.76 years.
Options to purchase shares of LMI Series B common stock had
a remaining weighted average term of 6.73 years and a
remaining weighted average vesting period of 1.73 years.
Subsequent to the spin off, options to acquire an aggregate of
438,054 shares of LMI Series A common stock were
issued to our employees pursuant to the Liberty Media
International, Inc. 2004 Incentive Plan (LMI 2004 Incentive
Plan) at a weighted average exercise price of $33.45 per share.
In addition, 22,152 shares of LMI Series A common stock
were issued to our non-employee directors pursuant to the
Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Non-employee Director
Incentive Plan (LMI 2004 Directors Incentive Plan) at a weighted
average exercise price of $33.95 per share. The employee stock
options will vest at the rate of 20% per year on each
anniversary of the grant date. The non-employee director stock
options will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date.
All stock options granted in 2004 expire ten years after the
grant date.
In 2004, LMI entered into an option agreement with John C.
Malone, LMI’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President, pursuant to which LMI granted to
Mr. Malone, under the LMI 2004 Incentive Plan, options to
acquire 1,568,562 shares of LMI Series B common stock at an
exercise price per share of $36.75. The options are fully
exercisable; however, Mr. Malone’s rights with respect
to the options and any shares issued upon exercise will vest at
the rate of 20% per year on each anniversary of the Spin Off
Date, provided that Mr. Malone continues to have a
qualifying relationship (whether as a director, officer,
employee or consultant) with LMI or any successor to LMI.
(Liberty Global would be the successor to LMI under the option
agreement.) If Mr. Malone ceases to have such a qualifying
relationship (subject to certain exceptions for his death or
disability or termination without cause), his unvested options
will be terminated and/or LMI will have the right to require Mr.
Malone to sell to LMI, at the exercise price of the options, any
shares of LMI Series B common stock previously acquired by
Mr. Malone upon exercise of options which have not vested
as of the date on which Mr. Malone ceases to have a qualifying
relationship with LMI.
The LMI 2004 Incentive Plan is administered by the compensation
committee of our board of directors. The compensation committee
of our board has full power and authority to grant eligible
persons the awards described below and determine the terms and
conditions under which any awards are made. The incentive plan
is designed to provide additional remuneration to certain
employees and independent contractors for exceptional service
and to encourage their investment in our company. The
compensation committee may grant non-qualified stock options,
stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted shares, stock
units, cash awards, performance awards or any combination of the
foregoing under the incentive plan (collectively, awards).
The maximum number of shares of LMI common stock with respect to
which awards may be issued under the incentive plan is
20 million, subject to anti-dilution and other adjustment
provisions of the LMI 2004 Incentive Plan. With limited
exceptions, no person may be granted in any calendar year awards
covering more than 2 million shares of our common stock. In
addition, no person may receive payment for cash awards during
any calendar year in excess of $10 million. Shares of our
common stock issuable pursuant to awards made under the
incentive plan are made available from either authorized but
unissued shares or shares that have been issued but reacquired
by our company.
The LMI 2004 Directors Incentive Plan is designed to provide a
method whereby non-employee directors may be awarded additional
remuneration for the services they render on our board and
committees of our board, and to encourage their investment in
capital stock of our company. The LMI 2004 Directors Incentive
Plan is
II-87
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
administered by our full board of directors. Our board has the
full power and authority to grant eligible non-employee
directors the awards described below and determine the terms and
conditions under which any awards are made, and may delegate
certain administrative duties to our employees.
Our board may grant non-qualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted shares, stock units or any
combination of the foregoing under the director plan
(collectively, awards). Only non-employee members of our board
of directors are eligible to receive awards under the LMI 2004
Directors Incentive Plan. The maximum number of shares of our
common stock with respect to which awards may be issued under
the director plan is 5 million, subject to anti-dilution
and other adjustment provisions of the LMI 2004 Directors
Incentive Plan. Shares of our common stock issuable pursuant to
awards made under the LMI 2004 Directors Incentive Plan will be
made available from either authorized but unissued shares or
shares that have been issued but reacquired by our company.
A summary of stock option activity in 2004 is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
LMI 2004 | |
|
LMI 2004 Directors | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Incentive Plan | |
|
Incentive Plan | |
|
Transitional Plan | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
| |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
| |
|
|
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
| LMI Series A common stock: |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2004
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
Issued in connection with the spin-off and related adjustments
to Liberty’s stock incentive awards
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
1,595,709 |
|
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
|
|
1,595,709 |
|
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
438,054 |
|
|
$ |
33.45 |
|
|
|
22,152 |
|
|
$ |
33.95 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
460,206 |
|
|
$ |
33.47 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
(353,485 |
) |
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
|
|
(353,485 |
) |
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
438,054 |
|
|
$ |
33.45 |
|
|
|
22,152 |
|
|
$ |
33.95 |
|
|
|
1,241,332 |
|
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
|
|
1,701,538 |
|
|
$ |
33.82 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
794,245 |
|
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
|
|
794,245 |
|
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-88
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
LMI 2004 Incentive Plan | |
|
Transitional Plan | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
| |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
| |
|
|
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
| LMI Series B common stock: |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2004
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
Issued in connection with the spin-off and related adjustments
to Liberty’s stock incentive awards
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
1,498,154 |
|
|
$ |
37.88 |
|
|
|
1,498,154 |
|
|
$ |
37.88 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,568,562 |
|
|
$ |
36.75 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
1,568,562 |
|
|
$ |
36.75 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
NA |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,568,562 |
|
|
$ |
36.75 |
|
|
|
1,498,154 |
|
|
$ |
37.88 |
|
|
|
3,066,716 |
|
|
$ |
37.30 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,568,562 |
(1) |
|
$ |
36.75 |
|
|
|
973,800 |
|
|
$ |
37.88 |
|
|
|
2,542,362 |
|
|
$ |
37.18 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Amount represents Mr. Malone’s options that are fully
exercisable, but not vested as of December 31, 2004. The
options or shares issued upon exercise vest at the rate of 20%
per year on each anniversary of the date on which the spin off
was completed (which was June 7, 2004), provided that
Mr. Malone meets certain conditions regarding his
relationship with LMI. See discussion above. |
The following table summarizes information about our stock
options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options outstanding | |
|
Options exercisable | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
| |
|
|
|
remaining | |
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
| |
|
|
|
contractual life | |
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
| Exercise price range |
|
Number | |
|
(years) | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
LMI Series A common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
$33.41
|
|
|
453,206 |
|
|
|
9.47 |
|
|
$ |
33.41 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
33.41 |
|
| |
$33.92
|
|
|
1,241,332 |
|
|
|
6.60 |
|
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
|
|
794,245 |
|
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
| |
$37.42
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
9.86 |
|
|
$ |
37.42 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
37.42 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
1,701,538 |
|
|
|
7.38 |
|
|
$ |
33.82 |
|
|
|
794,245 |
|
|
$ |
33.92 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LMI Series B common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
$36.75
|
|
|
1,568,562 |
|
|
|
9.47 |
|
|
$ |
36.75 |
|
|
|
1,568,562 |
(1) |
|
$ |
36.75 |
|
| |
$37.88
|
|
|
1,498,154 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
|
|
$ |
37.88 |
|
|
|
973,800 |
|
|
$ |
37.88 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
3,066,716 |
|
|
|
7.86 |
|
|
$ |
37.30 |
|
|
|
2,542,362 |
|
|
$ |
37.18 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Amount represents Mr. Malone’s options that are fully
exercisable, but not vested as of December 31, 2004. The
options or shares issued upon exercise vest at the rate of 20%
per year on each anniversary of the date on which the spin off
was completed (which was June 7, 2004), provided that
Mr. Malone meets certain conditions regarding his
relationship with LMI. See discussion above. |
II-89
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
The fair value of options granted pursuant to the LMI 2004
Incentive Plan and the LMI 2004 Directors Incentive Plan in 2004
has been estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
single-option pricing model and the following weighted-average
assumptions:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.09% |
|
|
Expected lives
|
|
|
6 years |
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0% |
|
Based on the above assumptions, the total fair value of options
granted under the LMI 2004 Incentive Plan and the LMI 2004
Directors Incentive Plan during 2004 was $24,872,000. The
weighted average fair value per share of LMI Series A and B
options granted in 2004 was $11.39 and $12.51, respectively. All
such options’ exercise prices were equal to their market
prices at the date of grant, except for the exercise price for
1,568,562 LMI Series B options granted in June 2004. The
exercise price for these options was equal to 110% of the market
price of the LMI Series A common stock on June 22,
2004 ($39.10 before considering the impact of the LMI Rights
Offering), the date that definitive terms were established for
such options. The closing market price of the LMI Series B
common stock on that date was $40.05 (before considering the
impact of the LMI Rights Offering).
In April 2000, four individuals, including two of our executive
officers and one of our directors, purchased a 20% common stock
interest in Liberty Jupiter, Inc., which owned an approximate
5.4% interest in J-COM at December 31, 2004. The
individuals paid a total purchase price of $800,000 for the 20%
common stock interest. We, one of our subsidiaries and these
individuals are parties to an amended and restated shareholders
agreement under which the individuals can require us to
purchase, after five years from the date of purchase, all or
part of their common stock interest in exchange for LMI
Series A common stock at its then-fair market value. The
shareholders agreement also provides that, if an individual
terminates his or her employment or consulting arrangement with
us or with LMC within five years from the date of purchase, we
have the right to purchase from that individual certain
“non-vested” shares (currently equal to 25% of the
common shares originally purchased by him or her) at the
original purchase price plus 6% per year. In addition, we have
the right at any time to purchase, in exchange for LMI
Series A common stock, the common stock interests of the
individuals at fair market value. Compensation charges
(credits) with respect to the interests held by the
aforementioned executive officers and directors were $6,318,000,
$1,164,000 and $(113,000) in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
|
|
|
UGC Equity Incentive Plan |
In August 2003 UGC’s board of directors (the UGC Board)
adopted an equity incentive plan (the UGC Incentive Plan).
UGC’s stockholders approved the UGC Incentive Plan, which
was effective as of September 1, 2003 and will terminate on
August 31, 2013. The UGC Incentive Plan permits the grant
of stock options, restricted stock awards, SARs, stock bonuses,
stock units, and other grants of stock (collectively, the UGC
Awards) covering up to 59,000,000 shares, as amended, of UGC
Class A or Class B common stock. The number of shares
increases on January 1 of each calendar year (beginning with
calendar year 2004) during the duration of the UGC Incentive
Plan by 1% of the aggregate number of shares of UGC Class A
and Class B common stock outstanding on December 31 of the
immediately preceding calendar year. No more than 5,000,000
shares of UGC Class A and Class B common stock in the
aggregate may be granted to a single
II-90
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
participant during any calendar year, and no more than 3,000,000
shares may be issued under the UGC Incentive Plan as UGC
Class B common stock. Employees, consultants, and other
non-employee directors of UGC and affiliated entities designated
by the UGC Board may receive UGC Awards under the UGC Incentive
Plan, provided, however, that incentive stock options may not be
granted to consultants or non-employee directors.
The UGC Incentive Plan is generally administered by the
compensation committee of the UGC Board, which has the
discretion to determine the employees and consultants to whom
the UGC Awards are granted, the number and type of shares
subject to the UGC Awards, the exercise price of the UGC Awards
(which may be at, below, or above the fair market value of UGC
Class A or Class B common stock on the date of grant),
the period over which the UGC Awards vest, the term of the UGC
Awards, and certain other provisions relating to the UGC Awards.
The compensation committee of the UGC Board may, under certain
circumstances, delegate to officers of UGC the authority to
grant UGC Awards to specified groups of employees and
consultants. The UGC Board has the sole authority to grant UGC
Awards under the UGC Incentive Plan to non-employee directors.
As a result of the dilution caused by UGC’s subscription
rights offering in February 2004, the exercise or base prices of
all awards outstanding pursuant to the UGC Incentive Plan were
reduced by $0.87.
A summary of activity for the UGC Incentive Plan options,
restricted stock and SARs for the year ended December 31,
2004 is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options(1) | |
|
Restricted stock(1) | |
|
SARs(1) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Number of | |
|
Weighted | |
|
Number of | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
| |
|
stock | |
|
average | |
|
restricted | |
|
average | |
|
Number of | |
|
average | |
| |
|
options | |
|
exercise price | |
|
stock awards | |
|
stock price | |
|
SARs | |
|
base price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Outstanding at January 1
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
32,087,270 |
|
|
$ |
3.82 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,780,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.72 |
|
|
|
224,587 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
|
5,062,138 |
|
|
$ |
7.31 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
|
$ |
7.48 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
(1,851,904 |
) |
|
$ |
4.39 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
(5,215,510 |
) |
|
$ |
3.66 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31
|
|
|
4,700,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.72 |
|
|
|
224,587 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
|
30,081,994 |
|
|
$ |
4.43 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
1,972,906 |
|
|
$ |
4.39 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
These UGC options and restricted stock awards vest over
5 years, with quarterly vesting beginning six months from
date of grant. The UGC SARs that were outstanding at
January 1, 2004 vest in 5 equal annual increments from
the date of grant. The UGC SARs granted in 2004 vest over
5 years, with quarterly vesting beginning six months from
the date of grant. |
The following table summarizes information about UGC options and
restricted stock granted under the UGC Incentive Plan during the
year ended December 31, 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options | |
|
Restricted stock | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
Exercise | |
| Exercise/Stock price |
|
Number | |
|
value | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
value | |
|
price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Less than market price
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Equal to market price
|
|
|
4,780,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.19 |
|
|
$ |
7.72 |
|
|
|
224,587 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
Greater than market price
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
4,780,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.19 |
|
|
$ |
7.72 |
|
|
|
224,587 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-91
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
The weighted-average fair value and weighted-average base price
of SARs granted under the UGC Incentive Plan in 2004 are as
follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
Base | |
| Base price |
|
Number | |
|
value | |
|
price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Less than market price(1)
|
|
|
154,500 |
|
|
$ |
4.57 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
Equal to market price
|
|
|
154,500 |
|
|
$ |
8.31 |
|
|
$ |
4.57 |
|
|
Equal to market price
|
|
|
4,753,138 |
|
|
$ |
6.02 |
|
|
$ |
7.55 |
|
|
Greater than market price
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
5,062,138 |
|
|
$ |
6.17 |
|
|
$ |
7.31 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
UGC originally granted these SARs below fair market value on
date of grant; however, upon exercise the holder will only
receive the difference between $2.87 and the lesser of $4.57 or
the market price of UGC Class A common stock on the date of
exercise. |
The following summarizes information about UGC’s options,
SARs and restricted stock outstanding and exercisable as of
December 31, 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options outstanding | |
|
Options exercisable |
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted |
| |
|
|
|
remaining | |
|
average | |
|
|
|
average |
| |
|
|
|
contractual | |
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise |
| Exercise price range |
|
Number | |
|
life (years) | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
$7.48
|
|
|
3,215,000 |
|
|
|
9.84 |
|
|
$ |
7.48 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$8.24
|
|
|
1,485,000 |
|
|
|
9.90 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
4,700,000 |
|
|
|
9.86 |
|
|
$ |
7.72 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
SARs outstanding | |
|
SARs exercisable | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
remaining | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
| |
|
|
|
contractual | |
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
| Base price range |
|
Number | |
|
life (years) | |
|
base price | |
|
Number | |
|
base price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
$2.87
|
|
|
11,523,022 |
|
|
|
8.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
|
507,378 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
$4.57
|
|
|
12,084,784 |
|
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
$ |
4.57 |
|
|
|
1,069,140 |
|
|
$ |
4.57 |
|
|
$5.26-$6.33
|
|
|
1,981,050 |
|
|
|
8.86 |
|
|
$ |
5.38 |
|
|
|
268,250 |
|
|
$ |
5.26 |
|
|
$7.10-$8.24
|
|
|
4,493,138 |
|
|
|
9.83 |
|
|
$ |
7.63 |
|
|
|
128,138 |
|
|
$ |
7.10 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
30,081,994 |
|
|
|
8.67 |
|
|
$ |
4.43 |
|
|
|
1,972,906 |
|
|
$ |
4.39 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Restricted stock outstanding | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
average | |
|
Weighted | |
| |
|
|
|
remaining | |
|
average | |
| |
|
|
|
contractual | |
|
stock | |
| Base price range |
|
Number | |
|
life (years) | |
|
price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
$8.24
|
|
|
224,587 |
|
|
|
4.95 |
|
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-92
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
A total of 11,523,022 SARs outstanding as of December 31,
2004 represent capped SARs, where the holder will only receive
the difference between $2.87 and the lesser of $4.57 or the
market price of UGC Class A common stock on the date of
exercise.
Fair Value of Grants in 2004. The fair value of options
granted pursuant to the UGC Incentive Plan in 2004 has been
estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
single-option pricing model and the following weighted-average
assumptions:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.61% |
|
|
Expected lives
|
|
|
6 years |
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0% |
|
Based on the above assumptions, the total fair value of options
granted under the UGC Incentive Plan was $29,580,000 in 2004.
During 1993, Old UGC adopted a stock option plan for certain of
its employees, which was assumed by UGC on January 30, 2002
(the UGC Employee Plan). The UGC Employee Plan provided for the
grant of options to purchase up to 39,200,000 shares of UGC
Class A common stock, of which options for up to 3,000,000
shares of UGC Class B common stock were available to be
granted in lieu of options for shares of UGC Class A common
stock. The UGC Committee had the discretion to determine the
employees and consultants to whom options were granted, the
number of shares subject to the options, the exercise price of
the options, the period over which the options became
exercisable, the term of the options (including the period after
termination of employment during which an option was to be
exercised) and certain other provisions relating to the options.
The maximum number of shares subject to options that were
allowed to be granted to any one participant under the UGC
Employee Plan during any calendar year was 5,000,000 shares. The
maximum term of options granted under the UGC Employee Plan was
ten years. Options granted were either incentive stock options
under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or
non-qualified stock options. The UGC Employee Plan expired
June 1, 2003. Options outstanding prior to the expiration
date continue to be recognized, but no new grants of options
will be made. All options outstanding on January 5, 2004
pursuant to the UGC Employee Plan became fully vested as a
result of the change of control due to the UGC Founders
Transaction. As of December 31, 2004, 9,881,029 and
3,000,000 shares of UGC Class A common stock and UGC
Class B common stock, respectively, were outstanding and
exercisable pursuant to the UGC Employee Plan.
Old UGC adopted a stock option plan for non-employee directors
effective June 1, 1993, which was assumed by UGC on
January 30, 2002 (the UGC 1993 Director Plan). The UGC 1993
Director Plan provided for the grant of an option to acquire
20,000 shares of UGC Class A common stock to each member of
the UGC Board of Directors who was not also an employee of UGC
(a UGC non-employee director) on June 1, 1993, and to each
person who is newly elected to the UGC Board of Directors as a
non-employee director after June 1, 1993, on the date of
their election. To allow for additional option grants to
non-employee directors, Old UGC adopted a second stock option
plan for non-employee directors effective March 20, 1998,
which was assumed by UGC on January 30, 2002 (the UGC 1998
Director Plan, and together with the UGC 1993 Director Plan, the
UGC Director Plans). Options under the UGC 1998 Director Plan
were granted at the discretion of UGC’s Board of Directors.
The maximum term of options granted under the UGC Director Plans
was ten years. Effective March 14, 2003, the UGC Board of
Directors terminated the UGC 1993
II-93
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Director Plan. Options outstanding prior to the date of
termination shall continue to be recognized, but no new grants
of options will be made.
A summary of stock option activity for the UGC Employee Plan and
the UGC Director Plans in 2004 is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
UGC Employee Plan | |
|
UGC Director Plans | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
| |
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
| |
|
|
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
| |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Outstanding at January 1
|
|
|
13,745,692 |
|
|
$ |
7.49 |
|
|
|
920,000 |
|
|
$ |
10.66 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.94 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(247,586 |
) |
|
$ |
14.63 |
|
|
|
(130,000 |
) |
|
$ |
47.75 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(617,077 |
) |
|
$ |
4.94 |
|
|
|
(260,000 |
) |
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31
|
|
|
12,881,029 |
|
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
|
|
730,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.11 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31
|
|
|
12,881,029 |
|
|
$ |
7.52 |
|
|
|
492,498 |
|
|
$ |
5.01 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The combined weighted-average fair value and weighted-average
exercise price of options granted under the UGC Employee Plan
and the UGC Director Plans in 2004 are as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Exercise price |
|
Number | |
|
Fair value | |
|
Exercise price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Less than market price
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.22 |
|
|
$ |
5.94 |
|
|
Equal to market price
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Greater than market price
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.22 |
|
|
$ |
5.94 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about the UGC
Employee Plan and the UGC Director Plans stock options
outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2004:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options outstanding | |
|
Options exercisable | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
| |
|
|
|
remaining | |
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
| |
|
|
|
contractual | |
|
exercise | |
|
|
|
exercise | |
| Exercise price range |
|
Number | |
|
life (years) | |
|
price | |
|
Number | |
|
price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
$3.29-$3.88
|
|
|
258,282 |
|
|
|
4.68 |
|
|
$ |
3.44 |
|
|
|
258,282 |
|
|
$ |
3.44 |
|
|
$4.13
|
|
|
10,426,709 |
|
|
|
6.71 |
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
|
|
10,266,291 |
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
|
$4.25-$67.51
|
|
|
2,914,038 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
$ |
19.08 |
|
|
|
2,836,954 |
|
|
$ |
19.39 |
|
|
$85.63
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
$ |
85.63 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
$ |
85.63 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
|
13,611,029 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
|
|
$ |
7.39 |
|
|
|
13,373,527 |
|
|
$ |
7.43 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UPC Stock Option Plan. UPC adopted a stock option plan on
June 13, 1996, as amended (the UPC Plan), for certain of
its employees and those of its subsidiaries. As a result of
UPC’s reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code, the UPC Plan was cancelled.
II-94
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
(14) Related Party
Transactions
During the 2004 period prior to the spin off, a subsidiary of
our company borrowed $116,666,000 from Liberty pursuant to
certain notes payable. Interest expense accrued on the amounts
borrowed pursuant to such notes payable was $1,534,000 in 2004.
In connection with the spin off, Liberty also entered into a
Short-Term Credit Facility with our company. Pursuant to the
Short-Term Credit Facility, Liberty had agreed to make loans to
us from time to time up to an aggregate principal amount of
$383,334,000. Amounts borrowed under the Short-Term Credit
Facility and the notes payable accrued interest at 6% per annum,
compounded semi-annually, and were due and payable no later than
March 31, 2005. During 2004, all amounts due to Liberty
under the notes payable were repaid with proceeds from the LMI
Rights Offering and the Short-Term Credit Facility was
terminated.
For periods prior to the spin off, corporate expenses were
allocated from Liberty to us based upon the cost of general and
administrative services provided. We believe such allocations
were reasonable and materially approximate the amount that we
would have incurred on a stand-alone basis. Amounts allocated to
us prior to the spin off pursuant to these arrangements
aggregated $10,833,000, $10,873,000 and $10,794,000 in 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively. The 2004 amount includes costs
associated with the spin off aggregating $2,952,000. Pursuant to
the Reorganization Agreement, we and Liberty each agreed to pay
50% of such spin off costs. Excluding our share of such spin off
costs, the intercompany amounts owed to Liberty as a result of
these allocations were contributed to our equity in connection
with the spin off. The amounts allocated by Liberty are included
in SG&A expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements
of operations.
In connection with the spin off, we and Liberty entered into a
Facilities and Services Agreement that sets forth the terms that
apply to services and other benefits provided by Liberty to us
following the spin off. Pursuant to the Facilities and Services
Agreement, Liberty provides us with office space and certain
general and administrative services including legal, tax,
accounting, treasury, engineering and investor relations
support. We reimburse Liberty for direct, out-of-pocket expenses
incurred by Liberty in providing these services and for our
allocable portion of facilities costs and costs associated with
any shared services or personnel. Amounts charged to us pursuant
to this agreement aggregated $1,324,000 for the period from the
Spin Off Date through December 31, 2004 and are included in
SG&A expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Prior to the spin off, Liberty transferred to our company a 25%
ownership interest in two of Liberty’s aircraft. In
connection with the transfer, we and Liberty entered into
certain agreements pursuant to which, among other things, we and
Liberty share the costs of Liberty’s flight department and
the costs of maintaining and operating the jointly owned
aircraft. Costs are allocated based upon either our actual usage
or our ownership interest, depending on the type of costs.
Amounts charged to us pursuant to these agreements aggregated
$230,000 for the period from the Spin Off Date through
December 31, 2004 and are included in SG&A expenses in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Other agreements between our company and Liberty that were
entered into in connection with the spin off our described in
note 2 (the Reorganization Agreement) and note 11 (the
Tax Sharing Agreement).
At December 31, 2004, John C. Malone beneficially owned
shares of Liberty common stock representing approximately 29.7%
of Liberty’s voting power and beneficially owned shares of
LMI common stock which may represent up to approximately 33.2%
of the voting power in our company, assuming the exercise in
full of certain options to acquire shares of LMI Series B
common stock granted to Mr. Malone at the time of the spin
off. In addition, six of our eight directors are also directors
of Liberty. By virtue of Mr. Malone’s voting power in
Liberty and our company, as well as his position as Chairman of
the Board of Liberty and positions as
II-95
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of
our company, and the aforementioned common directors, Liberty
may be deemed an affiliate of our company.
Certain key employees of our company hold stock options and
options with tandem SARs with respect to certain common stock of
Liberty. For additional information, see note 3.
In the normal course of business, Pramer provides programming
and uplink services to equity method affiliates of LMI. Total
revenue for such services from the LMI affiliates aggregated
$195,000, $862,000 and $569,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively.
In the normal course of business, Liberty Cablevision Puerto
Rico purchases programming services from subsidiaries of
Liberty. In 2004, 2003 and 2002, the charges for such services
aggregated $2,053,000, $1,867,000 and $632,000, respectively.
In 2004, 2003 and 2002, we recognized income from guarantee fees
charged to J-COM aggregating $641,000, $244,000 and $3,420,000,
respectively. See note 19.
During 2004, 2003 and 2002, we recognized interest income from
equity method affiliates (including J-COM in all periods and UGC
in 2003 and 2002) and other related parties aggregating
$11,166,000, $18,180,000 and $17,864,000, respectively. See
note 6.
UGC’s 2004 related party revenue was $7,982,000, which
consisted primarily of management, advisory and license fees,
call center charges and uplink services. UGC’s 2004 related
party operating expenses were $15,325,000, which consisted
primarily of programming costs and interconnect fees.
In addition, in 2002 we recognized $1,891,000 of aggregate
interest expense on indebtedness owed to UGC and its
subsidiaries.
(15) Transactions with
Officers and Directors
Prior to March 2, 2005, Liberty owned a 78.2% economic and
non-voting interest in VLG Argentina LLC (VLG Argentina), an
entity that owns a 50% interest in Cablevisión. VLG
Acquisition Corp. (VLG Acquisition), an entity in which neither
Liberty nor our company has any ownership interests, owned the
remaining 21.8% economic interest and all of the voting power in
VLG Argentina LLC. An executive officer and an officer of our
company were shareholders of VLG Acquisition. Prior to joining
our company, they sold their equity interests in VLG Acquisition
to the remaining shareholder, but each retained a contractual
right to 33% of any proceeds in excess of $100,000 from the sale
of VLG Acquisition Corp.’s interest in VLG Argentina, or
from distributions to VLG Acquisition Corp. by VLG Argentina in
connection with a sale of VLG Argentina’s interest in
Cablevisión. Although we have no direct or indirect equity
interest in Cablevisión, we had the right and obligation
pursuant to Cablevisión’s debt restructuring agreement
to contribute $27,500,000 to Cablevisión in exchange
for newly issued Cablevisión shares representing
approximately 40.0% of Cablevisión’s fully diluted
equity (the Subscription Right).
On November 2, 2004, Liberty, VLG Acquisition, VLG
Argentina, a subsidiary of our company and the then sole
shareholder of VLG Acquisition entered into an agreement with a
third party to transfer all of the equity in VLG Argentina and
all of our rights and obligations with respect to the
Subscription Right to the third party for aggregate
consideration of $65 million. This agreement provided that
$40,527,000 of such proceeds would be allocated to our company
for the Subscription Right. We received 50% of such proceeds as
a down payment in November 2004 and we received the remainder in
March 2005. We will recognize a gain of $40,527,000 during the
first quarter of 2005 in connection with the closing of this
transaction.
II-96
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
As a result of the foregoing transactions, the executive officer
and officer of our company who retained the above-described
contractual rights with respect to VLG Acquisition received
aggregate cash distributions of $7.3 million in respect of
such rights during the fourth quarter of 2004 and the first
quarter of 2005.
(16) Reorganization of Old
UGC
Old UGC is a wholly owned subsidiary of UGC that owns VTR and an
approximate 34% interest in Austar United Communications Ltd.
Certain information concerning the consolidated operating
performance and total assets of VTR are set forth in
note 20.
On January 12, 2004, Old UGC filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
On September 21, 2004, UGC and Old UGC filed with the
Bankruptcy Court a plan of reorganization, which was
subsequently amended on October 5, 2004. The plan of
reorganization provided for the acquisition by Old UGC of
$638,008,000 face amount of certain senior notes of Old UGC
(Old UGC Senior Notes) held by UGC (following cancellation of
certain offsetting obligations) for common stock of Old UGC
and $599,173,000 face amount of Old UGC Senior Notes held
by IDT United, another consolidated subsidiary of UGC for
preferred stock of Old UGC. Old UGC Senior Notes held
by third parties ($24,627,000 face amount) would be left
outstanding (after cure, through the repayment of approximately
$5,073,000 in unpaid interest, and reinstatement). In addition,
Old UGC would make a payment of approximately $3,114,000 in
settlement of certain outstanding guarantee obligations. The
Bankruptcy Court confirmed the plan of reorganization on
November 10, 2004. Following an appeal period, the plan of
reorganization was consummated on November 24, 2004.
On November 24, 2004, immediately following the
consummation of the plan of reorganization, UGC executed a stock
purchase agreement with two shareholders of IDT United whereby
UGC acquired all of the remaining capital stock of IDT United
not previously owned by UGC for approximately $22,711,000 in
cash. As a result of this transaction, IDT United became
UGC’s wholly owned subsidiary.
In connection with the Old UGC Reorganization, a total of
$24,627,000 was deposited into an escrow account for the purpose
of repayment of the Old UGC Senior Notes. On
February 15, 2005, the Old UGC Senior Notes were
redeemed in full for total cash consideration of $25,068,000
plus accrued interest from August 15, 2004 through the
redemption date totaling $1,324,000.
II-97
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
(17) Restructuring and Other
Charges
A summary of UGC’s restructuring charge activity in 2004 is
set forth in the table below:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Employee | |
|
|
|
Programming | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
severance | |
|
|
|
and lease | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
and | |
|
Office | |
|
contract | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
termination | |
|
closures | |
|
termination | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Restructuring liability as of January 1, 2004
|
|
$ |
8,405 |
|
|
|
16,821 |
|
|
|
34,399 |
|
|
|
2,442 |
|
|
|
62,067 |
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
8,176 |
|
|
|
16,862 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
25,832 |
|
|
Cash paid
|
|
|
(6,938 |
) |
|
|
(5,741 |
) |
|
|
(7,566 |
) |
|
|
(1,057 |
) |
|
|
(21,302 |
) |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
3,695 |
|
|
|
(657 |
) |
|
|
6,001 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring liability as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
10,623 |
|
|
|
29,925 |
|
|
|
30,528 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
72,598 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term portion
|
|
$ |
4,973 |
|
|
|
5,271 |
|
|
|
3,817 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
14,406 |
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
|
5,650 |
|
|
|
24,654 |
|
|
|
26,711 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
58,192 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total
|
|
$ |
10,623 |
|
|
|
29,925 |
|
|
|
30,528 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
72,598 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May and September 2004, UGC’s Netherlands operations
recorded an aggregate charge of $5,690,000 for severance
benefits as a result of a restructuring plan to change its
management structure from a three-region model to a centralized
management organization, eliminating certain redundancies and
vacating space under an office lease. In December 2004,
UGC’s Netherlands operations changed its estimate regarding
the timing and amount of sub-lease income related to a
restructuring plan that was finalized in 2001. While the office
space under lease remains vacated, UGC has been unable to
sub-lease this space and cannot predict that it will be able to
for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the restructuring
liability has been adjusted by approximately $15,970,000 to
reflect UGC’s best estimate regarding future sub-lease
income for the vacated property. The remaining $4,172,000 of
restructuring charges in 2004 related to various redundancy
eliminations and other streamlining efforts at chellomedia BV
(chellomedia) an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of UGC,
and Priority Telecom.
In January 2004, UGC’s Chief Executive Officer resigned and
received certain benefits totaling $3,186,000.
II-98
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
(18) Other Comprehensive
Earnings (Loss)
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) included in our
company’s consolidated balance sheets and statements of
stockholders’ equity reflect the aggregate of foreign
currency translation adjustments and unrealized holding gains
and losses on securities classified as available-for-sale. The
change in the components of accumulated other comprehensive
earnings (loss), net of taxes, is summarized as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Foreign | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
currency | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Other | |
| |
|
translation | |
|
gains (losses) | |
|
comprehensive | |
| |
|
adjustment | |
|
on securities | |
|
earnings (loss) | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Balance at January 1, 2002
|
|
$ |
(102,988 |
) |
|
|
(30,400 |
) |
|
|
(133,388 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)
|
|
|
(173,715 |
) |
|
|
46,649 |
|
|
|
(127,066 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
(276,703 |
) |
|
|
16,249 |
|
|
|
(260,454 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
102,294 |
|
|
|
111,594 |
|
|
|
213,888 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
(174,409 |
) |
|
|
127,843 |
|
|
|
(46,566 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive earnings (loss)
|
|
|
129,141 |
|
|
|
(122,292 |
) |
|
|
6,849 |
|
|
Effect of change in estimated blended state income tax rate
(note 11)
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
Spin off transaction (note 2)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50,982 |
|
|
|
50,982 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
(43,046 |
) |
|
|
57,056 |
|
|
|
14,010 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of other comprehensive earnings (loss) are
reflected in our company’s consolidated statements of
comprehensive earnings (loss), net of taxes. The following table
summarizes the tax effects related to each component of other
comprehensive earnings (loss):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tax | |
|
|
| |
|
Before-tax | |
|
benefit | |
|
Net-of-tax | |
| |
|
amount | |
|
(expense) | |
|
amount | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Year ended December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
204,392 |
|
|
|
(75,251 |
) |
|
|
129,141 |
|
|
Unrealized holding losses arising during period
|
|
|
(189,465 |
) |
|
|
67,173 |
|
|
|
(122,292 |
) |
|
Effect of change in estimated blended state income tax rate
(note 11)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings
|
|
$ |
14,927 |
|
|
|
(5,333 |
) |
|
|
9,594 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
168,239 |
|
|
|
(65,945 |
) |
|
|
102,294 |
|
|
Unrealized holding gains arising during period
|
|
|
182,941 |
|
|
|
(71,347 |
) |
|
|
111,594 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive earnings
|
|
$ |
351,180 |
|
|
|
(137,292 |
) |
|
|
213,888 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
$ |
(284,779 |
) |
|
|
111,064 |
|
|
|
(173,715 |
) |
|
Unrealized holding gains arising during period
|
|
|
76,474 |
|
|
|
(29,825 |
) |
|
|
46,649 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
(208,305 |
) |
|
|
81,239 |
|
|
|
(127,066 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-99
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
(19) Commitments and
Contingencies
In the normal course of business, we have entered into
agreements that commit our company to make cash payments in
future periods with respect to non-cancelable leases,
programming contracts, purchases of customer premise equipment,
construction activities, network maintenance, and upgrade and
other commitments arising from our agreements with local
franchise authorities. As of December 31, 2004, the U.S.
dollar equivalent (based on December 31, 2004 exchange
rates) of such commitments is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Payments due during years ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Operating Leases
|
|
$ |
101,440 |
|
|
|
74,519 |
|
|
|
68,111 |
|
|
|
49,892 |
|
|
|
44,919 |
|
|
|
124,092 |
|
|
|
462,973 |
|
|
Purchase obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Programming
|
|
|
95,911 |
|
|
|
23,877 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
|
|
2,647 |
|
|
|
17,086 |
|
|
|
156,016 |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
22,717 |
|
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
24,674 |
|
|
Other commitments
|
|
|
53,697 |
|
|
|
9,753 |
|
|
|
5,883 |
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
|
|
3,972 |
|
|
|
14,313 |
|
|
|
91,571 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual payments
|
|
$ |
273,765 |
|
|
|
110,106 |
|
|
|
84,298 |
|
|
|
60,036 |
|
|
|
51,538 |
|
|
|
155,491 |
|
|
|
735,234 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental costs under non-cancelable lease arrangements amounted to
$88,588,000, $2,934,000 and $1,701,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. It is expected that in the normal course of
business, leases that expire generally will be renewed or
replaced by similar leases.
Programming commitments consist of obligations associated with
certain of our programming contracts that are enforceable and
legally binding on us inasmuch as we have agreed to pay minimum
fees, regardless of the actual number of subscribers or whether
we terminate cable service to a portion of our subscribers or
dispose of a portion of our cable systems.
Other purchase obligations consist of commitments to purchase
customer premise equipment that are enforceable and legally
binding on us. Other commitments consist of commitments to
rebuild or upgrade cable systems and to extend the cable network
to new developments, network maintenance, and other fixed
minimum contractual commitments associated with our agreements
with franchise or municipal authorities. The amount and timing
of the payments included in the table with respect to our
rebuild, upgrade and network extension commitments are estimated
based on the remaining capital required to bring the cable
distribution system into compliance with the requirements of the
applicable franchise agreement specifications.
In addition to the commitments set forth in the table above, we
have commitments under agreements with programming vendors,
franchise authorities and municipalities, and other third
parties pursuant to which we expect to make payments in future
periods. Such amounts are not included in the above table
because they are not fixed or determinable due to various
factors.
Various partnerships and other affiliates of our company
accounted for using the equity method finance a substantial
portion of their acquisitions and capital expenditures through
borrowings under their own credit facilities and net cash
provided by their operating activities. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, certain of our affiliates may require additional
capital to finance their operating or investing activities. In
addition, we are a party to stockholder and partnership
agreements that provide for possible capital calls on
stockholders and partners. In the event our affiliates require
additional financing and we fail to meet a capital call, or other
II-100
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
commitment to provide capital or loans to a particular company,
such failure may have adverse consequences to our company. These
consequences may include, among others, the dilution of our
equity interest in that company, the forfeiture of our right to
vote or exercise other rights, the right of the other
stockholders or partners to force us to sell our interest at
less than fair value, the forced dissolution of the company to
which we have made the commitment or, in some instances, a
breach of contract action for damages against us.
In addition to the foregoing, the agreement governing our
investment in Mediatti contains a put-call arrangement whereby
we could be required to purchase another investor’s
ownership interest at fair value. We have similar put-call
arrangements with the minority shareholders of Belgium Cable
Investors and Zone Vision. For additional information concerning
these contingent obligations, see notes 6 and 22.
For a description of certain put obligations that we assumed in
connection with the Noos acquisition, see note 5.
We and UGC have entered into indemnification agreements with
each of our respective directors, our respective named executive
officers and certain other officers. Pursuant to such agreements
and as permitted by our and UGC’s Bylaws, we each will
indemnify our respective indemnities to the fullest extent
permitted by law against any and all expenses, judgments, fines,
penalties and settlements incurred as a result of being a party
or threatened to be a party in a legal proceeding as a result of
their service to or on behalf of our company or UGC, as
applicable.
|
|
|
Guarantees and Other Credit Enhancements |
At December 31, 2004, Liberty guaranteed
¥4,695 million ($45,842,000) of the bank debt of
J-COM. Liberty’s guarantees expire as the underlying debt
matures and is repaid. The debt maturity dates range from 2004
to 2019. In connection with the spin off, we have agreed to
indemnify Liberty for any amounts Liberty is required to fund
under these arrangements.
In the ordinary course of business, we have provided
indemnifications to (i) purchasers of certain of our
assets, (ii) our lenders, (iii) our vendors and
(iv) other parties. In addition, we have provided
performance and/or financial guarantees to our franchise
authorities, customers and vendors. Historically, these
arrangements have not resulted in our company making any
material payments and we do not believe that they will result in
material payments in the future.
We have contingent liabilities related to legal proceedings and
other matters arising in the ordinary course of business.
Although it is reasonably possible we may incur losses upon
conclusion of such matters, an estimate of any loss or range of
loss cannot be made. In our opinion, it is expected that
amounts, if any, which may be required to satisfy such
contingencies will not be material in relation to the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Cignal. On April 26, 2002, UPC received a notice
that certain former shareholders of Cignal Global Communications
(Cignal) filed a lawsuit against UPC in the District Court of
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, claiming $200 million on the
basis that UPC failed to honor certain option rights that were
granted to those shareholders in connection with the acquisition
of Cignal by Priority Telecom. UPC believes that it has complied
in full with its obligations to these shareholders through the
successful completion of the initial public offering of Priority
Telecom on September 27, 2001. Accordingly, UPC believes
that the Cignal shareholders’ claims are without merit and
intends to defend this suit vigorously. In December 2003,
certain members and former members of the Supervisory Board of
Priority Telecom were put on notice that a tort
II-101
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
claim may be filed against them for their cooperation in the
initial public offering. A hearing was held on March 8,
2005, and a decision is expected in April 2005.
Class Action Lawsuits Relating to the Merger Transaction
with UGC. Since January 18, 2005, twenty-one lawsuits
have been filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery and one
lawsuit in the Denver District Court, State of Colorado, all
purportedly on behalf of UGC’s public stockholders,
regarding the announcement on January 18, 2005 of the
execution by UGC and us of the agreement and plan of merger for
the combination of our companies under a new parent company. The
defendants named in these actions include UGC, Gene W.
Schneider, Michael T. Fries, David B. Koff,
Robert R. Bennett, John C. Malone, John P. Cole,
Bernard G. Dvorak, John W. Dick, Paul A. Gould
and Gary S. Howard (directors of UGC) and our company. The
allegations in each of the complaints, which are substantially
similar, assert that the defendants have breached their
fiduciary duties of loyalty, care, good faith and candor and
that various defendants have engaged in self-dealing and unjust
enrichment, affirmed an unfair price, and impeded or discouraged
other offers for UGC or its assets in bad faith and for improper
motives. In addition to seeking to enjoin the transaction, the
complaints seek remedies, including damages for the public
holders of UGC’s stock and an award of attorney’s fees
to plaintiffs’ counsel. On February 11, 2005, the
Delaware Court of Chancery consolidated the Delaware lawsuits.
In connection with the Delaware lawsuits, defendants have been
served with one request for production of documents. The
defendants believe the lawsuits are without merit.
The Netherlands 2004 Rate Increases. The Dutch
competition authority (NMA) is currently investigating the
price increases that UGC made with respect to its video services
in 2004 to determine whether it abused its dominant position. If
the NMA were to find that the price increases amount to an abuse
of a dominant position, the NMA could impose fines of up to 10%
of UGC’s 2003 video revenue in The Netherlands and UGC
would be obliged to reconsider the price increases.
Historically, in many parts of The Netherlands, UGC is a party
to contracts with local municipalities that seek to control
aspects of its Dutch business including, in some cases, pricing
and package composition. Most of these contracts have been
eliminated by agreement, although some contracts are still in
force and under negotiation. In some cases there is litigation
ongoing where some municipalities have resisted UGC’s
attempts to move away from the contracts.
We and UGC operate in numerous countries around the world and
accordingly we are subject to, and pay annual income taxes
under, the various income tax regimes in the countries in which
we operate. We have historically filed, and continue to file,
all required income tax returns and pay income taxes reasonably
determined to be due. The tax rules and regulations in many
countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation. From
time to time we may be subject to a review of our historic
income tax filings. In connection with such reviews, disputes
could arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation
or application of certain income tax rules related to our
business in that tax jurisdiction. We have accrued income taxes
(and related interest and penalties, if applicable) for amounts
that represent income tax exposure items in tax years for which
additional income taxes may be assessed.
|
|
| (20) |
Information About Operating Segments |
We own a variety of international subsidiaries and investments
that provide broadband distribution services and video
programming services. We identify our reportable segments as
(i) those consolidated subsidiaries that represent 10% or
more of our revenue, operating cash flow (as defined below), or
total assets, and (ii) those equity method affiliates where
our investment or share of operating cash flow represents 10% or
more of our total assets or operating cash flow, respectively.
We evaluate performance and make decisions about allocating
resources to our operating segments based on financial measures
such as revenue and operating cash flow. In addition, we review
non-financial measures such as subscriber growth and
penetration, as appropriate.
II-102
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
Operating cash flow is the primary measure used by our chief
operating decision makers to evaluate segment operating
performance and to decide how to allocate resources to segments.
As we use the term, operating cash flow is defined as revenue
less operating and selling, general and administrative expenses
(excluding depreciation and amortization, impairment of
long-lived assets, restructuring and other charges and
stock-based compensation). We believe operating cash flow is
meaningful because it provides investors a means to evaluate the
operating performance of our segments and our company on an
ongoing basis using criteria that is used by our internal
decision makers. Our internal decision makers believe operating
cash flow is a meaningful measure and is superior to other
available GAAP measures because it represents a transparent view
of our recurring operating performance and allows management to
readily view operating trends, perform analytical comparisons
and benchmarking between segments in the different countries in
which we operate and identify strategies to improve operating
performance. For example, our internal decision makers believe
that the inclusion of impairment and restructuring charges
within operating cash flow distorts the ability to efficiently
assess and view the core operating trends in our segments. In
addition, our internal decision makers believe our measure of
operating cash flow is important because analysts and investors
use it to compare our performance to other companies in our
industry. A reconciliation of total consolidated operating cash
flow to our consolidated pre-tax earnings (loss) is
presented below. Investors should view operating cash flow as a
supplement to, and not a substitute for, operating income, net
income, cash flow from operating activities and other GAAP
measures of income as a measure of operating performance.
For 2004 we have identified the following consolidated
subsidiaries and equity method affiliates as our reportable
segments:
|
|
|
| |
• |
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands |
| |
• |
UGC Broadband — France |
| |
• |
UGC Broadband — Austria |
| |
• |
UGC Broadband — Other Europe |
| |
• |
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR) |
| |
• |
Super Media/ J-COM |
UGC, a majority-owned subsidiary of our company, is an
international broadband communications provider of video, voice,
and Internet services with operations in 16 countries.
UGC’s operations are located primarily in Europe and Latin
America. UGC Broadband — The Netherlands, UGC
Broadband — France and UGC Broadband —
Austria represent UGC’s three largest operating segments in
Europe in terms of revenue. UGC Broadband — Other
Europe includes broadband operations in Norway, Sweden, Belgium,
Ireland, Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic,
Slovenia and Romania. None of the components of UGC
Broadband — Other Europe constitute a reportable
segment. UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR) represents
UGC’s operating segment in Latin America. J-COM provides
broadband communication services in Japan. Prior to the
December 28, 2004 transaction in which our 45.45% ownership
interest in J-COM and a 19.78% interest in J-COM owned by
Sumitomo were combined in Super Media, we accounted for J-COM
using the equity method of accounting. As a result of these
transactions, we held a 69.68% noncontrolling interest in Super
Media, and Super Media held a 65.23% controlling interest in
J-COM at December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004, we
accounted for our 69.68% interest in Super Media using the
equity method. As a result of a change in the corporate
governance of Super Media that occurred on February 18,
2005, we will begin accounting for Super Media as a consolidated
subsidiary effective January 1, 2005. For additional
information concerning J-COM and Super Media, see note 6.
The amounts presented below represent 100% of each
business’ revenue and operating cash flow. These amounts
are combined and are then adjusted to remove the amounts related
to UGC during the 2003 and 2002 periods and J-COM during all
periods to arrive at the reported consolidated amounts. This
presentation
II-103
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
is designed to reflect the manner in which management reviews
the operating performance of individual businesses regardless of
whether the investment is accounted for as a consolidated
subsidiary or an equity investment. It should be noted, however,
that this presentation is not in accordance with GAAP since the
results of equity method investments are required to be reported
on a net basis. Further, we could not, among other things, cause
any noncontrolled affiliate to distribute to us our
proportionate share of the revenue or operating cash flow of
such affiliate:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
| |
|
Revenue | |
|
cash flow | |
|
Revenue | |
|
cash flow | |
|
Revenue | |
|
cash flow | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
716,932 |
|
|
|
361,265 |
|
|
|
592,223 |
|
|
|
267,075 |
|
|
|
459,044 |
|
|
|
119,329 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
312,792 |
|
|
|
53,690 |
|
|
|
113,946 |
|
|
|
13,920 |
|
|
|
92,441 |
|
|
|
(10,446 |
) |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
299,874 |
|
|
|
111,950 |
|
|
|
260,162 |
|
|
|
98,278 |
|
|
|
198,189 |
|
|
|
64,662 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
752,900 |
|
|
|
281,398 |
|
|
|
561,737 |
|
|
|
203,495 |
|
|
|
461,149 |
|
|
|
131,882 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
299,951 |
|
|
|
108,752 |
|
|
|
229,835 |
|
|
|
69,951 |
|
|
|
186,426 |
|
|
|
41,959 |
|
|
J-COM
|
|
|
1,504,709 |
|
|
|
589,597 |
|
|
|
1,233,492 |
|
|
|
428,318 |
|
|
|
930,736 |
|
|
|
211,146 |
|
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
261,835 |
|
|
|
(28,907 |
) |
|
|
242,017 |
|
|
|
(6,090 |
) |
|
|
218,027 |
|
|
|
(36,957 |
) |
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(1,504,709 |
) |
|
|
(589,597 |
) |
|
|
(3,125,022 |
) |
|
|
(1,057,200 |
) |
|
|
(2,445,757 |
) |
|
|
(507,520 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
2,644,284 |
|
|
|
888,148 |
|
|
|
108,390 |
|
|
|
17,747 |
|
|
|
100,255 |
|
|
|
14,055 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Investments in affiliates | |
|
Long-lived assets | |
|
Total assets | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
1,099,118 |
|
|
|
1,334,294 |
|
|
|
2,024,365 |
|
|
|
2,458,724 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,065,874 |
|
|
|
246,307 |
|
|
|
1,198,372 |
|
|
|
274,180 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
302,820 |
|
|
|
307,758 |
|
|
|
827,506 |
|
|
|
700,209 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
11,797 |
|
|
|
16,757 |
|
|
|
1,026,989 |
|
|
|
873,221 |
|
|
|
1,832,761 |
|
|
|
1,845,202 |
|
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
351,314 |
|
|
|
322,606 |
|
|
|
682,270 |
|
|
|
602,762 |
|
|
Super Media/J-COM
|
|
|
36,846 |
|
|
|
26,027 |
|
|
|
2,441,196 |
|
|
|
2,274,632 |
|
|
|
4,289,536 |
|
|
|
3,929,190 |
|
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
1,853,845 |
|
|
|
1,818,811 |
|
|
|
456,984 |
|
|
|
356,134 |
|
|
|
7,137,089 |
|
|
|
4,905,631 |
|
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
(36,846 |
) |
|
|
(121,265 |
) |
|
|
(2,441,196 |
) |
|
|
(5,617,375 |
) |
|
|
(4,289,536 |
) |
|
|
(11,028,861 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
1,865,642 |
|
|
|
1,740,552 |
|
|
|
4,303,099 |
|
|
|
97,577 |
|
|
|
13,702,363 |
|
|
|
3,687,037 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-104
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
The following table provides a reconciliation of total segment
operating cash flow to earnings (loss) before income taxes
and minority interests:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Total segment operating cash flow
|
|
$ |
888,148 |
|
|
|
17,747 |
|
|
|
14,055 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation credits (charges)
|
|
|
(142,762 |
) |
|
|
(4,088 |
) |
|
|
5,815 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(960,888 |
) |
|
|
(15,114 |
) |
|
|
(13,087 |
) |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
(69,353 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(45,928 |
) |
|
Restructuring and other charges
|
|
|
(29,018 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating loss
|
|
|
(313,873 |
) |
|
|
(1,455 |
) |
|
|
(39,145 |
) |
| |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(288,532 |
) |
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
|
|
(3,943 |
) |
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
65,607 |
|
|
|
24,874 |
|
|
|
25,883 |
|
|
Share of earnings (losses) of affiliates, net
|
|
|
38,710 |
|
|
|
13,739 |
|
|
|
(331,225 |
) |
|
Realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivative
instruments, net
|
|
|
(54,947 |
) |
|
|
12,762 |
|
|
|
(16,705 |
) |
|
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses), net
|
|
|
92,305 |
|
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
(8,267 |
) |
|
Gains on exchanges of investment securities
|
|
|
178,818 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
122,618 |
|
|
Other-than-temporary declines in fair values of investments
|
|
|
(18,542 |
) |
|
|
(6,884 |
) |
|
|
(247,386 |
) |
|
Gains on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
35,787 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Gains (losses) on disposition of investments, net
|
|
|
43,714 |
|
|
|
(4,033 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(7,931 |
) |
|
|
6,651 |
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Earnings (loss) before income taxes and minority interests
|
|
$ |
(228,884 |
) |
|
|
48,888 |
|
|
|
(495,981 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Capital expenditures | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
UGC Broadband — The Netherlands
|
|
$ |
(84,698 |
) |
|
|
(63,451 |
) |
|
|
(97,841 |
) |
|
UGC Broadband — France
|
|
|
(65,435 |
) |
|
|
(48,810 |
) |
|
|
(19,688 |
) |
|
UGC Broadband — Austria
|
|
|
(53,660 |
) |
|
|
(43,751 |
) |
|
|
(38,388 |
) |
|
UGC Broadband — Other Europe
|
|
|
(146,965 |
) |
|
|
(75,873 |
) |
|
|
(53,142 |
) |
|
UGC Broadband — Chile (VTR)
|
|
|
(41,685 |
) |
|
|
(41,391 |
) |
|
|
(80,006 |
) |
|
J-COM
|
|
|
(295,914 |
) |
|
|
(279,841 |
) |
|
|
(383,913 |
) |
|
Corporate and all other
|
|
|
(115,904 |
) |
|
|
(82,717 |
) |
|
|
(71,037 |
) |
|
Elimination of equity affiliates
|
|
|
295,914 |
|
|
|
612,965 |
|
|
|
719,105 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated LMI
|
|
$ |
(508,347 |
) |
|
|
(22,869 |
) |
|
|
(24,910 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
II-105
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
(21) Quarterly Financial
Information (Unaudited)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
1st | |
|
2nd | |
|
3rd | |
|
4th | |
| |
|
quarter | |
|
quarter | |
|
quarter | |
|
quarter | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands, except per share amounts | |
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
576,303 |
|
|
|
580,659 |
|
|
|
708,807 |
|
|
|
778,515 |
|
| |
Operating loss
|
|
$ |
(83,627 |
) |
|
|
(34,192 |
) |
|
|
(43,061 |
) |
|
|
(152,993 |
) |
| |
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
(83,951 |
) |
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
74,365 |
|
|
|
(21,132 |
) |
| |
Historical and pro forma earnings (loss) per common share
(note 3)
— Basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
|
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Revenue
|
|
$ |
24,947 |
|
|
|
27,076 |
|
|
|
28,031 |
|
|
|
28,336 |
|
| |
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,777 |
|
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
(4,070 |
) |
| |
Net earnings (loss)
|
|
$ |
6,802 |
|
|
|
10,499 |
|
|
|
9,051 |
|
|
|
(5,463 |
) |
| |
Historical and pro forma earnings (loss) per common share
(note 3)
— Basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
(22) Subsequent Events
On December 3, 2002, Europe Movieco Partners Limited
(Movieco) filed a request for arbitration against UPC with the
International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber
of Commerce. The request contained claims that were based on a
cable affiliation agreement entered into between the parties on
December 21, 1999. In the proceedings, Movieco claimed
(1) unpaid license fees due under the affiliation
agreement, plus interest, (2) an order for specific
performance of the affiliation agreement or, in the alternative,
damages for breach of that agreement, and (3) legal and
arbitration costs plus interest. On January 13, 2005, the
Arbitral Tribunal rendered an award in which Movieco’s
claim for the unpaid license fees, as described above, was
sustained and determined that UPC must pay $39.3 million of
unpaid license fees, plus interest and legal fees of
£1.5 million ($2.9 million). We paid a total
amount of $49.3 million in settlement of the award during
the first quarter of 2005. Such amount was accrued in our
December 31, 2004 consolidated balance sheet. All other
claims and counterclaims were dismissed.
In January 2005, chellomedia acquired an 87.5% interest in Zone
Vision Networks Ltd. (Zone Vision) from its current
shareholders. Zone Vision is a programming company that owns
three pay television channels and represents over 30
international channels. The consideration for the transaction
consisted of $50 million in cash and 1.6 million
shares of UGC Class A common stock, which are subject to a
five-year vesting period. As part of the transaction,
chellomedia will contribute to Zone Vision the 49% interest it
already holds in Reality TV Ltd. and chellomedia’s Club
channel business. Zone Vision’s minority shareholders have
the right to put 60% of their 12.5% shareholding in Zone Vision
to chellomedia on the third anniversary of the completion of the
acquisition, and 100% of their shareholding on the fifth
anniversary of the completion of the acquisition. Chellomedia
has corresponding call rights. The price payable upon exercise
of the put or call will be the then fair market value of the
shareholdings purchased.
II-106
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(See note 1)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 — (Continued)
In December 2004, a subsidiary of chellomedia entered into an
agreement to sell its 28.7% interest in EWT Holding GmbH to
other investors for
€30 million
($40.9 million) in cash. Chellomedia received 90% of the
purchase price on January 31, 2005 and the remaining 10% is
due and payable no later than June 30, 2005.
On February 10, 2005, UPC Broadband Holding, UGC’s
wholly owned subsidiary, acquired 100% of the shares in Telemach
d.o.o., a broadband communications provider in Slovenia, for
cash consideration of approximately $89.4 million.
II-107
PART III
Except as indicated below, the following required information is
incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement for
our 2005 Annual Meeting of shareholders presently scheduled to
be held in June 2005.
|
|
| Item 10. |
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT |
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website
at www.libertymediainternational.com
|
|
| Item 11. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
|
|
| Item 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
|
|
| Item 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
| Item 14. |
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
We will file our definitive proxy statement for our 2005 Annual
Meeting of shareholders with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on or before May 2, 2005.
III-1
PART IV
|
|
| Item 15. |
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. |
(a) (1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The financial statements required under this Item begin on page
II-38 of this Annual Report.
(a) (2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
The financial statement schedules required under this Item are
as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Auditors’ Report on Financial Statement
Schedules
|
|
IV-7 |
|
Schedule I — Condensed Financial Information of
Registrant (Parent Company Information)
|
|
IV-8 |
|
Condensed Balance Sheet (Parent Company Only)
|
|
IV-8 |
|
Condensed Statement of Operations (Parent Company Only)
|
|
IV-9 |
|
Condensed Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Parent Company
Only)
|
|
IV-10 |
|
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows (Parent Company Only)
|
|
IV-11 |
|
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
IV-12 |
|
Separate Financial Statements of Subsidiaries Not Consolidated
and 50 Percent or Less Owned Persons:
|
|
|
| |
Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
| |
|
Independent Auditors’ Report
|
|
IV-13 |
| |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004
|
|
IV-14 |
| |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
IV-16 |
| |
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
IV-17 |
| |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
IV-18 |
| |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
IV-19 |
| |
Jupiter Programming Co.ltd.
|
|
|
| |
|
Independent Auditors’ Report
|
|
IV-41 |
| |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004
|
|
IV-42 |
| |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
IV-44 |
| |
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and
Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2002,
2003 and 2004
|
|
IV-45 |
| |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
IV-46 |
| |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
IV-47 |
|
|
|
Torneos y Competencias S.A. |
|
|
| |
We indirectly own a 40% equity interest in Torneos y
Competencias S. A. (Torneos), an independent producer of
Argentine sports and entertainment programming, and we account
for this investment using the equity method of accounting. SEC
Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X requires that we include
or incorporate by reference Torneos financial statements in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K since our investment in Torneos
is considered to be significant in the context of Rule 3-09
for the year ended December 31, 2004. |
IV-1
|
|
| |
LMI expects to file an amendment to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K on or before March 31, 2005 to include the
audited consolidated financial statements of Torneos. |
(a) (3) EXHIBITS
Listed below are the exhibits filed as part of this Annual
Report (according to the number assigned to them in
Item 601 of Regulation S-K):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2 — Plan of Acquisition Reorganization, Arrangement,
Liquidation or Succession: |
| |
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 17, 2005,
among New Cheetah, Inc. (now known as Liberty Global, Inc.), the
Registrant, UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (“UGC”), Cheetah
Acquisition Corp. and Tiger Global Acquisition Corp.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
January 17, 2005) |
|
3 — Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws: |
| |
3.1 |
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10, dated
April 2, 2004 (File No. 000-50671) (the
“Form 10”)) |
| |
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10, dated
May 25, 2004 (File No. 000-50671) (the
“Form 10 Amendment”)) |
|
4 — Instruments Defining the Rights of Securities
Holders, including Indentures: |
| |
4.1 |
|
|
Specimen certificate for shares of Series A common stock,
par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 10) |
| |
4.2 |
|
|
Specimen certificate for shares of Series B common stock,
par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10) |
| |
4.3 |
|
|
Indenture, dated as of April 6, 2004, between UGC and The
Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to UGC’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
April 6, 2004 (File No. 000-496-58) (the
“UGC April 2004 8-K”)) |
| |
4.4 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2004,
between UGC and Credit Suisse First Boston (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the UGC April 2004 8-K) |
| |
4.5 |
|
|
Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated March 7, 2005,
among UPC Broadband Holding B.V. (“UPC
Broadband”) and UPC Financing Partnership (“UPC
Financing”), as Borrowers, the guarantors listed therein,
and TD Bank Europe Limited, as Facility Agent and Security
Agent, including as Schedule 3 thereto the Restated
€1,072,000,000
Senior Secured Credit Facility, originally dated
January 16, 2004, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, the
guarantors listed therein, the banks and financial institutions
listed therein as Initial Facility D Lenders, TD Bank
Europe Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the
facility agents under the Existing Facility (as defined therein)
(the “2004 Credit Agreement”) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.32 to UGC’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, dated March 14, 2005 (File
No. 000-496-58) (the “UGC 2004 10-K”)) |
| |
4.6 |
|
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated June 24,
2004, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional Facility E
Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to UGC’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated June 29, 2004
(File No. 000-496-58)) |
| |
4.7 |
|
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated December 2,
2004, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional
Facility F Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to UGC’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 2, 2004
(File No. 000-496-58)) |
| |
4.8 |
|
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated March 9,
2005, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional
Facility G Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the
UGC 2004 10-K) |
IV-2
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
4.9 |
|
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated March 7,
2005, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional Facility H
Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the UGC 2004 10-K |
| |
4.10 |
|
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated March 9,
2005, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional
Facility I Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the
UGC 2004 10-K) |
| |
4.11 |
|
|
Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated March 7, 2005,
among UPC Broadband and UPC Financing, as Borrowers, the
guarantors listed therein, TD Bank Europe Limited and
Toronto Dominion (Texas), Inc., as Facility Agents, and
TD Bank Europe Limited, as Security Agent, including as
Schedule 3 thereto the Restated Credit Agreement,
€3,500,000,000
and US$347,500,000 and
€95,000,000
Senior Secured Credit Facility, originally dated
October 26, 2000, among UPC Broadband and UPC Financing, as
Borrowers, the guarantors listed therein, the Lead Arrangers
listed therein, the banks and financial institutions listed
therein as Original Lenders, TD Bank Europe Limited and
Toronto-Dominion (Texas) Inc., as Facility Agents, and
TD Bank Europe Limited, as Security Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the UGC 2004 10-K) |
| |
4.12 |
|
|
The Registrant undertakes to furnish to the Securities and
Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of all instruments
with respect to long-term debt not filed herewith |
|
10 — Material Contracts: |
| |
10.1 |
|
|
Reorganization Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2004, among
Liberty Media Corporation (“Liberty”), the Registrant
and the other parties named therein (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10.2 |
|
|
Form of Facilities and Services Agreement between Liberty and
the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10.3 |
|
|
Agreement for Aircraft Joint Ownership and Management, dated as
of May 21, 2004, between Liberty and the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10.4 |
|
|
Form of Tax Sharing Agreement between Liberty and the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10.5 |
|
|
Form of Credit Facility between Liberty and the Registrant
(terminated in accordance with its terms) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10.6 |
|
|
Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10.7 |
|
|
Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Non-Employee Director
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10.8 |
|
|
Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Incentive Plan
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of June 7,
2004, between John C. Malone and the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7(A) to
Mr. Malone’s Schedule 13D/ A (Amendment
No. 1) with respect to the Registrant’s common stock,
dated July 14, 2004 (File No. 005-79904)) |
| |
10.9 |
|
|
Form of Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Incentive Plan
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q, dated August 16, 2004 (File
No. 000-50671) (the “LMI June 2004 10-Q”)) |
| |
10.10 |
|
|
Form of Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Non-Employee
Director Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the LMI June
2004 10-Q) |
| |
10.11 |
|
|
Liberty Media International, Inc. Transitional Stock Adjustment
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, dated
June 23, 2004 (File No. 333-116790)) |
| |
10.12 |
|
|
Description of Director Compensation Policy* |
| |
10.13 |
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its
Directors* |
IV-3
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
10.14 |
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its
Executive Officers* |
| |
10.15 |
|
|
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of UGC, effective
June 1, 1993, amended and restated as of January 22,
2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
UGC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 15,
2004 (File No. 000-496-58) (the “UGC 2003 10-K”)) |
| |
10.16 |
|
|
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of UGC, effective
March 20, 1998, amended and restated as of January 22,
2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the UGC
2003 10-K) |
| |
10.17 |
|
|
2003 Equity Incentive Plan of UGC, effective September 1,
2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the UGC
2003 10-K) |
| |
10.18 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement, dated as of
May 21, 2004, among the Registrant, Liberty Media
International Holdings, LLC, Robert R. Bennett,
Miranda Curtis, Graham Hollis, Yasushige Nishimura, Liberty
Jupiter, Inc., and, solely for purposes of Section 9
thereof, Liberty (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.23 to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10.19 |
|
|
Standstill Agreement between UGC and Liberty, dated as of
January 5, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to UGC’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated January 5, 2004 (File No. 000-496-58)) |
| |
10.20 |
|
|
Standstill Agreement among UGC, Liberty and the parties named
therein, dated January 30, 2002 (terminated except as to
(i) UGC’s obligations under the final sentence of
Section 9(b) and (ii) Section 7B and the related
definitions in Section 1 as set forth in, and as modified
by, the Letter Agreement referenced in
Exhibit 10.21)(incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to UGC’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1, dated February 14, 2002
(File No. 333-82776)) |
| |
10.21 |
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated November 12, 2003, between UGC and
Liberty (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
UGC’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
November 12, 2003 (File No. 000-496-58)) |
| |
10.22 |
|
|
Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2003,
among Liberty and the Stockholders of UGC named therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7(j) to
Liberty’s Schedule 13D/ A with respect to UGC’s
Class A common stock, dated August 21, 2003) |
| |
10.23 |
|
|
Amendment to Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of
December 22, 2003, among Liberty and the Stockholders of
UGC named on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Liberty’s Registration
Statement on Form S-3, dated December 24, 2003
(File No. 333-111564)) |
| |
10.24 |
|
|
Stock and Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 15,
2004, among Suez SA, MédiaRéseaux SA, UPC
France Holding BV and UGC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to UGC’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated July 1, 2004 (File No. 000-496-58) (the
“UGC July 2004 8-K”)) |
| |
10.25 |
|
|
Amendment to the Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 1,
2004, among Suez SA, MédiaRéseaux SA, UPC
France Holding BV and UGC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the UGC July 2004 8-K) |
| |
10.26 |
|
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2004, among
UGC, UPC France Holding BV and Suez SA (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the UGC July 2004 8-K) |
| |
10.27 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement dated November 26,
2004, among Liberty Japan, Inc., Liberty Japan II, Inc.,
LMI Holdings Japan, LLC, Liberty Kanto, Inc., Liberty
Jupiter, Inc. and Sumitomo Corporation, and, solely with respect
to Sections 3.1(c), 3.1(d) and 16.22 thereof, the
Registrant* |
|
21 — List of Subsidiaries* |
|
23 — Consent of Experts and Counsel: |
| |
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP* |
| |
23.2 |
|
|
Consent of KPMG AZSA & Co* |
| |
23.3 |
|
|
Consent of KPMG AZSA & Co* |
IV-4
| |
|
|
|
|
|
31 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification: |
| |
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer* |
| |
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Senior Vice President and Treasurer* |
| |
31.3 |
|
|
Certification of Senior Vice President and Controller* |
|
32 — Section 1350 Certification* |
IV-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
| |
Liberty Media Corporation
|
|
|
|
| |
By |
/s/ Elizabeth M. Markowski
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Elizabeth M. Markowski |
| |
Senior Vice President, Secretary |
| |
and General Counsel |
Dated: March 14, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
| |
|
|
|
|
| Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
/s/ John C. Malone
John
C. Malone |
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
| |
/s/ Robert R. Bennett
Robert
R. Bennett |
|
Vice Chairman |
|
March 14, 2005 |
| |
/s/ Donne F. Fisher
Donne
F. Fisher |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
| |
/s/ David E. Rapley
David
E. Rapley |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
| |
/s/ M. LaVoy Robison
M.
LaVoy Robison |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
| |
/s/ Larry E. Romrell
Larry
E. Romrell |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
| |
/s/ J. C. Sparkman
J.
C. Sparkman |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
| |
/s/ J. David Wargo
J.
David Wargo |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
| |
/s/ Graham E. Hollis
Graham
E. Hollis |
|
Senior Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
March 14, 2005 |
| |
/s/ Bernard G. Dvorak
Bernard
G. Dvorak |
|
Senior Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting
Officer) |
|
March 14, 2005 |
IV-6
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Liberty Media International, Inc.:
Under date of March 11, 2005, we reported on the
consolidated balance sheets of Liberty Media International, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive
earnings (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, which are included in the Company’s
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004. In connection with our audits of the
aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also
audited the related consolidated financial statement schedules I
and II in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004. These financial statement
schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statement schedules based on our audits.
In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 11, 2005
IV-7
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SCHEDULE I
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
(Parent Company Information)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(Parent Company Only)
As of December 31, 2004
amounts in thousands
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,069,996 |
|
| |
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
56,011 |
|
| |
Other current assets
|
|
|
621 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,126,628 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
4,133,285 |
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost
|
|
|
7,597 |
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
7,210 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
5,267,123 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
3,927 |
|
| |
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
5,257 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
9,184 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
31,133 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
40,317 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Series A common stock, $.01 par value. Authorized
500,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding; 168,514,962 and nil
shares at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
| |
Series B common stock, $.01 par value. Authorized
50,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding; 7,264,300 and nil
shares at December 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively
|
|
|
73 |
|
| |
Series C common stock, $.01 par value. Authorized
500,000,000 shares; no shares issued at December 31, 2004
or 2003
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
7,001,635 |
|
| |
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,662,707 |
) |
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes
|
|
|
14,010 |
|
| |
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
5,226,806 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
5,267,123 |
|
| |
|
|
|
IV-8
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SCHEDULE I
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
(Parent Company Information)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Parent Company Only)
For the seven months ended December 31, 2004
amounts in thousands
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
|
|
$ |
8,535 |
|
| |
Stock-based compensation charges
|
|
|
20,382 |
|
| |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
387 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(29,304 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
8,673 |
|
| |
Realized and unrealized losses on derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
(4,146 |
) |
| |
Other income, net
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
5,992 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Loss before income taxes and equity in income of consolidated
subsidiaries, net
|
|
|
(23,312 |
) |
|
Equity in income of consolidated subsidiaries, net
|
|
|
76,743 |
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
5,763 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
59,194 |
|
| |
|
|
|
IV-9
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SCHEDULE I
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
(Parent Company Information)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Parent Company Only)
For the seven months ended December 31, 2004
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Common stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
comprehensive | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
| |
|
paid-in | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
earnings (loss), | |
|
stock, | |
|
stockholders’ | |
| |
|
Series A | |
|
Series B | |
|
Series C | |
|
capital | |
|
deficit | |
|
net of taxes | |
|
at cost | |
|
equity | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Balance at June 1, 2004
|
|
$ |
1,399 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,227,851 |
|
|
|
(1,721,901 |
) |
|
|
(56,388 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,451,022 |
|
| |
Net earnings
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
59,194 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
59,194 |
|
| |
Other comprehensive earnings
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
70,398 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
70,398 |
|
| |
Adjustment due to issuance of stock by subsidiaries and
affiliates and other changes in subsidiary equity, net of taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,049 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,049 |
|
| |
Common stock issued in rights offering
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
735,366 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
735,661 |
|
| |
Stock issued for stock option exercises
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,987 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11,990 |
|
| |
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
| |
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,382 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
20,382 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
1,685 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,001,635 |
|
|
|
(1,662,707 |
) |
|
|
14,010 |
|
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
|
|
5,226,806 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-10
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SCHEDULE I
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
(Parent Company Information)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Parent Company Only)
For the seven months ended December 31, 2004
amounts in thousands
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
59,194 |
|
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Stock-based compensation charges
|
|
|
20,382 |
|
| |
|
Realized and unrealized losses on derivative instruments, net
|
|
|
4,146 |
|
| |
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
(4,417 |
) |
| |
|
Other noncash items, net
|
|
|
30,582 |
|
| |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Receivables, prepaids and other
|
|
|
(329 |
) |
| |
|
|
Payables and accruals
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
111,800 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Investments in and loans to consolidated subsidiaries,
affiliates and others
|
|
|
323,538 |
|
| |
Net cash paid to purchase or settle derivative instruments
|
|
|
(35,653 |
) |
| |
Other investing activities, net
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
287,849 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net proceeds received from rights offering
|
|
|
735,661 |
|
| |
Treasury stock purchase
|
|
|
(127,890 |
) |
| |
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
11,990 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
619,761 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,019,410 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
50,586 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$ |
1,069,996 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid for taxes
|
|
$ |
4,383 |
|
| |
|
|
|
IV-11
LIBERTY MEDIA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
Additions | |
|
|
| |
|
Balance at | |
|
to costs | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
| |
|
beginning | |
|
and | |
|
|
|
Deductions | |
|
|
|
end of | |
| |
|
of period | |
|
expenses | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
or write-offs | |
|
FCTA | |
|
Other | |
|
period | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
amounts in thousands | |
|
Year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2002
|
|
$ |
11,208 |
|
|
|
6,689 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,162 |
) |
|
|
(3,631 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,104 |
|
| |
2003
|
|
$ |
13,104 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,076 |
) |
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
13,947 |
|
| |
2004
|
|
$ |
13,947 |
|
|
|
22,663 |
|
|
|
51,400 |
|
|
|
(30,765 |
) |
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
61,390 |
|
IV-12
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of
Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd. and Subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd. (a Japanese corporation)
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
KPMG AZSA & Co.
Tokyo, Japan
February 14, 2005
IV-13
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Yen in thousands) | |
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
¥ |
7,785,978 |
|
|
¥ |
10,420,109 |
|
| |
Restricted cash
|
|
|
1,773,060 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
¥229,793 thousand in 2003 and ¥245,504 thousand in 2004
|
|
|
7,907,324 |
|
|
|
8,823,311 |
|
| |
Loans to related party (Note 5)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,030,000 |
|
| |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (Note 8)
|
|
|
1,596,150 |
|
|
|
4,099,032 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
19,062,512 |
|
|
|
27,372,452 |
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Investments in affiliates (Notes 3 and 5)
|
|
|
2,794,533 |
|
|
|
3,773,360 |
|
| |
Investments in other securities, at cost
|
|
|
2,891,973 |
|
|
|
2,901,566 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
5,686,506 |
|
|
|
6,674,926 |
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost (Notes 5 and 7):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Land
|
|
|
1,826,787 |
|
|
|
1,796,217 |
|
| |
Distribution system and equipment
|
|
|
312,330,187 |
|
|
|
344,207,670 |
|
| |
Support equipment and buildings
|
|
|
11,593,849 |
|
|
|
12,612,896 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
325,750,823 |
|
|
|
358,616,783 |
|
| |
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(81,523,580 |
) |
|
|
(108,613,916 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
244,227,243 |
|
|
|
250,002,867 |
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Goodwill, net (Notes 2 and 4)
|
|
|
139,853,596 |
|
|
|
140,658,718 |
|
| |
Other (Note 4 and 8)
|
|
|
13,047,229 |
|
|
|
14,582,383 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
152,900,825 |
|
|
|
155,241,101 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
421,877,086 |
|
|
¥ |
439,291,346 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are
an integral part of these balance sheets.
IV-14
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Yen in thousands) | |
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Short-term loans
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
250,000 |
|
| |
Long-term debt — current portion (Notes 6
and 12)
|
|
|
2,438,480 |
|
|
|
5,385,980 |
|
| |
Capital lease obligations — current portion
(Notes 5, 7 and 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related parties
|
|
|
7,673,978 |
|
|
|
8,237,323 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,800,456 |
|
|
|
1,291,918 |
|
| |
Accounts payable
|
|
|
17,293,932 |
|
|
|
17,164,463 |
|
| |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
3,576,708 |
|
|
|
6,155,380 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
32,783,554 |
|
|
|
38,485,064 |
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion (Notes 6 and 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Related parties
|
|
|
149,739,250 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
72,092,465 |
|
|
|
194,088,485 |
|
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion (Notes 5, 7
and 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Related parties
|
|
|
17,704,295 |
|
|
|
19,714,799 |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
3,951,900 |
|
|
|
2,560,511 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
41,635,426 |
|
|
|
41,699,497 |
|
|
Severance and retirement allowance (Note 9)
|
|
|
2,023,706 |
|
|
|
2,718,792 |
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock of consolidated subsidiary
(Note 10)
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,411,564 |
|
|
|
180,098 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
323,842,160 |
|
|
|
299,947,246 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
1,266,287 |
|
|
|
974,227 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity (Note 11):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ordinary shares no par value
|
|
|
63,132,998 |
|
|
|
78,133,015 |
|
| |
|
Authorized 15,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding
4,684,535.74 shares at December 31, 2003
and 5,146,074.74 shares at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
122,837,273 |
|
|
|
137,930,774 |
|
| |
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(88,506,887 |
) |
|
|
(77,685,712 |
) |
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(694,745 |
) |
|
|
(8,204 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
96,768,639 |
|
|
|
138,369,873 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
421,877,086 |
|
|
¥ |
439,291,346 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are
an integral part of these balance sheets.
IV-15
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Yen in thousands, except share and | |
| |
|
per share amounts) | |
|
Revenue (Note 5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Subscription fees
|
|
¥ |
97,144,356 |
|
|
¥ |
123,214,958 |
|
|
¥ |
140,826,446 |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
19,486,170 |
|
|
|
19,944,074 |
|
|
|
20,519,825 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
116,630,526 |
|
|
|
143,159,032 |
|
|
|
161,346,271 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating and programming costs (Note 5)
|
|
|
45,967,220 |
|
|
|
49,895,426 |
|
|
|
53,869,646 |
|
| |
Selling, general and administrative (inclusive of stock
compensation expense of ¥61,902 thousand in 2002,
¥120,214 thousand in 2003 and ¥84,267 thousand in
2004) (Notes 5 and 11)
|
|
|
44,266,444 |
|
|
|
43,650,593 |
|
|
|
44,311,685 |
|
| |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
30,079,753 |
|
|
|
36,410,894 |
|
|
|
40,573,166 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
120,313,417 |
|
|
|
129,956,913 |
|
|
|
138,754,497 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,682,891 |
) |
|
|
13,202,119 |
|
|
|
22,591,774 |
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest expense, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related parties (Note 5)
|
|
|
(2,847,551 |
) |
|
|
(4,562,594 |
) |
|
|
(4,055,343 |
) |
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,335,400 |
) |
|
|
(3,360,674 |
) |
|
|
(6,045,939 |
) |
| |
Other income, net
|
|
|
147,639 |
|
|
|
316,116 |
|
|
|
37,574 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and other items
|
|
|
(7,718,203 |
) |
|
|
5,594,967 |
|
|
|
12,528,066 |
|
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates (inclusive of stock
compensation expense of ¥2,156 thousand in 2002,
¥(2,855) thousand in 2003 and ¥9,217 thousand in 2004)
(Note 11)
|
|
|
235,792 |
|
|
|
414,756 |
|
|
|
610,110 |
|
|
Minority interest in net (income) losses of consolidated
subsidiaries
|
|
|
196,498 |
|
|
|
(448,668 |
) |
|
|
(458,624 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,285,913 |
) |
|
|
5,561,055 |
|
|
|
12,679,552 |
|
|
Income taxes (Note 8)
|
|
|
(256,763 |
) |
|
|
(209,805 |
) |
|
|
(1,858,377 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
¥ |
(7,542,676 |
) |
|
¥ |
5,351,250 |
|
|
¥ |
10,821,175 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income (loss) per share — basic and diluted
|
|
¥ |
(1,917 |
) |
|
¥ |
1,214 |
|
|
¥ |
2,221 |
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares
outstanding — basic and diluted
|
|
|
3,934,286 |
|
|
|
4,407,046 |
|
|
|
4,871,169 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.
IV-16
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
| |
|
Ordinary | |
|
Paid-in | |
|
Income | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Shareholders’ | |
| |
|
Shares | |
|
Capital | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Loss | |
|
Equity | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Yen in thousands, except per share amounts) | |
|
Balance at January 1, 2002
|
|
¥ |
47,002,623 |
|
|
¥ |
106,525,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
(86,315,461 |
) |
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
67,212,643 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
¥ |
(7,542,676 |
) |
|
|
(7,542,676 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(7,542,676 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
(7,542,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation (Notes 1 and 11)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
64,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
64,058 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
¥ |
47,002,623 |
|
|
¥ |
106,589,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
(93,858,137 |
) |
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
59,734,025 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
¥ |
5,351,250 |
|
|
|
5,351,250 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,351,250 |
|
|
Other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unrealized loss on cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(694,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(694,745 |
) |
|
|
(694,745 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
4,656,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation (Notes 1 and 11)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
117,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
117,359 |
|
|
Ordinary shares issued upon conversion of long-term debt;
750,250 shares at ¥43,000 per share (Note 6)
|
|
|
16,130,375 |
|
|
|
16,130,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32,260,750 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
¥ |
63,132,998 |
|
|
¥ |
122,837,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
(88,506,887 |
) |
|
¥ |
(694,745 |
) |
|
¥ |
96,768,639 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
¥ |
10,821,175 |
|
|
|
10,821,175 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,821,175 |
|
|
Other comprehensive gain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unrealized gain on cash flow hedge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686,541 |
|
|
|
686,541 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
11,507,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation (Notes 1 and 11)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
93,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
93,484 |
|
|
Ordinary shares issued; 461,539 shares at ¥65,000 per share
(Note 1)
|
|
|
15,000,017 |
|
|
|
15,000,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,000,034 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
¥ |
78,133,015 |
|
|
¥ |
137,930,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
(77,685,712 |
) |
|
¥ |
(8,204 |
) |
|
¥ |
138,369,873 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.
IV-17
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Year ended December 31, | |
| |
|
| |
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Yen in thousands) | |
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income (loss)
|
|
¥ |
(7,542,676 |
) |
|
¥ |
5,351,250 |
|
|
¥ |
10,821,175 |
|
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Gain on forgiveness of subsidiary debt
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(400,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
30,079,753 |
|
|
|
36,410,894 |
|
|
|
40,573,166 |
|
| |
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates
|
|
|
(235,792 |
) |
|
|
(414,756 |
) |
|
|
(610,110 |
) |
| |
|
Minority interest in net income (losses) of consolidated
subsidiaries
|
|
|
(196,498 |
) |
|
|
448,668 |
|
|
|
458,624 |
|
| |
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
61,902 |
|
|
|
120,214 |
|
|
|
84,267 |
|
| |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
45,591 |
|
| |
|
Provision for retirement allowance
|
|
|
412,692 |
|
|
|
417,335 |
|
|
|
647,592 |
|
| |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects
of business combinations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
1,368,081 |
|
|
|
1,712,904 |
|
|
|
(431,162 |
) |
| |
|
|
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
553,192 |
|
|
|
349,147 |
|
|
|
4,866 |
|
| |
|
|
(Increase)/decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(1,651,599 |
) |
|
|
(325,769 |
) |
|
|
2,443,960 |
|
| |
|
|
(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable
|
|
|
(3,124,486 |
) |
|
|
171,705 |
|
|
|
(1,184,539 |
) |
| |
|
|
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
188,537 |
|
|
|
2,665,162 |
|
|
|
39,279 |
|
| |
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in deferred revenue
|
|
|
2,768,512 |
|
|
|
458,315 |
|
|
|
(380,578 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
22,681,618 |
|
|
|
46,965,069 |
|
|
|
52,512,131 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(48,108,176 |
) |
|
|
(32,478,389 |
) |
|
|
(31,792,956 |
) |
| |
Acquisition of new subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
1,856,230 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(442,910 |
) |
| |
Investments in and advances to affiliates
|
|
|
(665,575 |
) |
|
|
(172,500 |
) |
|
|
(359,500 |
) |
| |
(Increase)/decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,773,060 |
) |
|
|
1,773,060 |
|
| |
Loans to related party
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,030,000 |
) |
| |
Acquisition of minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(164,590 |
) |
|
|
(25,565 |
) |
|
|
(4,960,484 |
) |
| |
Other investing activities
|
|
|
(650,729 |
) |
|
|
(76,891 |
) |
|
|
(69,427 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(47,732,840 |
) |
|
|
(34,526,405 |
) |
|
|
(39,882,217 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,000,034 |
|
| |
Net increase/(decrease) in short-term loans
|
|
|
36,984,965 |
|
|
|
(228,785,000 |
) |
|
|
250,000 |
|
| |
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
2,620,000 |
|
|
|
239,078,000 |
|
|
|
185,302,000 |
|
| |
Principal payments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(2,082,335 |
) |
|
|
(8,184,980 |
) |
|
|
(210,097,730 |
) |
| |
Principal payments under capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(9,293,487 |
) |
|
|
(10,843,024 |
) |
|
|
(11,887,363 |
) |
| |
Other financing activities
|
|
|
(738,854 |
) |
|
|
(3,464,440 |
) |
|
|
(3,562,724 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
27,490,289 |
|
|
|
(12,199,444 |
) |
|
|
(9,995,783 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,439,067 |
|
|
|
239,220 |
|
|
|
2,634,131 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
5,107,691 |
|
|
|
7,546,758 |
|
|
|
7,785,978 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
¥ |
7,546,758 |
|
|
¥ |
7,785,978 |
|
|
¥ |
10,420,109 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are
an integral part of these statements.
IV-18
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
| 1. |
Description of Business, Basis of Financial Statements and
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Business and
Organization
Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd. (“Jupiter”) and
its subsidiaries (the “Company”) own and operate cable
telecommunication systems throughout Japan and provide cable
television services, telephony and high-speed Internet access
services (collectively, “Broadband services”). The
telecommunications industry in Japan is highly regulated by the
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications
(“MIC”). In general, franchise rights granted by the
MIC to the Company’s subsidiaries for operation of cable
telecommunications systems in their respective localities are
not exclusive. Currently, cable television services account for
a majority of the Company’s revenue. Telephony operations
accounted for approximately 10%, 13% and 15% of total revenue
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively. Internet operations accounted for approximately
23%, 24% and 25% of total revenue for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
The Company’s beneficial ownership at December 31,
2004 was as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
LMI/ Sumisho Super Media, LLC (“SM”)
|
|
|
65.23% |
|
|
Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”)
|
|
|
19.46% |
|
|
Sumitomo Corporation (“SC”)
|
|
|
12.25% |
|
|
Mitsui & Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
1.53% |
|
|
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
1.53% |
|
In August 2004, Liberty Media International, Inc.
(“LMI”), SC and Microsoft made capital contributions
to the Company in the following amounts: LMI:
¥14,065 million for 216,382 shares:
SC: ¥9,913 million for 152,505 shares; and
Microsoft ¥6,022 million for 92,652 shares. The shares
of common stock issued in exchange for the capital contributions
were based on fair value at the date of the transaction. As a
result of the transaction, their beneficial ownership in the
Company increased to 45.45%, 32.03% and 19.46%, respectively.
The proceeds from the capital contributions were used to repay
subordinated debt owed to each of LMI, SC and Microsoft in the
same amounts as contributed by each shareholder respectively
(see Note 6).
On December 28, 2004, LMI contributed all of its then
45.45% beneficial ownership interest and SC contributed 19.78%
of its then ownership interest in the Company to SM, a company
owned 69.7% by LMI and 30.3% by SC. As a result, SM became a
65.23% shareholder of the Company while SC’s direct
ownership interest was reduced to 12.25%. SC is obligated to
contribute its remaining 12.25% direct ownership interest in the
Company to SM within six months of an initial public offering
(“IPO”) in Japan by the Company.
The Company has historically relied on financing from its
principle shareholders to meet liquidity requirements. However,
in December 2004, the Company entered into a new syndicated
facility and repaid all outstanding debt with its principal
shareholders. For additional information concerning the 2004
refinancing, see Note 6.
|
|
|
Basis of Financial Statements |
The Company maintains its books of account in conformity with
financial accounting standards of Japan. The consolidated
financial statements presented herein have been prepared in a
manner and reflect certain adjustments which are necessary to
conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). These
adjustments include those related to the scope of consolidation,
accounting for business combinations, accounting for income
taxes, accounting for leases, accounting for stock-based
compensation, revenue recognition of certain revenues,
post-retirement benefits, depreciation and amortization and
accruals for certain expenses.
IV-19
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and all of its majority-owned
subsidiaries which are primarily cable system operators
(“SOs”). All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated. For the consolidated
subsidiaries with a negative equity position, the Company has
recognized the entire amount of cumulative losses of such
subsidiaries regardless of its ownership percentage.
|
|
|
(b) Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid debt
instruments with an initial maturity of three months or less.
|
|
|
(c) Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
Allowance for doubtful accounts is computed based on historical
bad debt experience and includes estimated uncollectible amounts
based on analysis of certain individual accounts, including
claims in bankruptcy.
For those investments in affiliates in which the Company’s
voting interest is 20% to 50% and the Company has the ability to
exercise significant influence over the affiliates’
operation and financial policies, the equity method of
accounting is used. Under this method, the investment is
originally recorded at cost and adjusted to recognize the
Company’s share of the net earnings or losses of its
affiliates. Prior to the adoption on January 1, 2002 of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the excess
of the Company’s cost over its percentage interest in the
net assets of each affiliate was amortized, primarily over a
period of 20 years. Subsequent to the adoption of
SFAS No. 142, such excess is no longer amortized. All
significant intercompany profits from these affiliates have been
eliminated.
Investments in other securities carried at cost represent
non-marketable equity securities in which the Company’s
ownership is less than 20% and the Company does not have the
ability to exercise significant influence over the
entities’ operation and financial policies.
The Company evaluates its investments in affiliates and
non-marketable equity securities for impairment due to declines
in value considered to be other than temporary. In performing
its evaluations, the Company utilizes various information, as
available, including cash flow projections, independent
valuations, industry multiples and, as applicable, stock price
analysis. In the event of a determination that a decline in
value is other than temporary, a charge to earnings is recorded
for the loss, and a new cost basis in the investment is
established.
|
|
|
(e) Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment, including construction materials, are
carried at cost, which includes all direct costs and certain
indirect costs associated with the construction of cable
television transmission and distribution systems, and the costs
of new subscriber installations. Depreciation is computed on a
straight-line method using estimated useful lives ranging from
10 to 15 years for distribution systems and equipment, from
15 to 60 years for buildings and structures and from 8 to
15 years for support equipment. Equipment under capital
leases is stated at the present value of minimum lease payments.
Equipment under capital leases is amortized on a straight-line
basis over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful
life of the asset, which ranges from 2 to 21 years.
Ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to income as
incurred. Major replacements and improvements are capitalized.
When property and equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of,
the cost and related
IV-20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
accumulated depreciation accounts are relieved of the applicable
amounts and any differences are included in depreciation
expense. The impact of such retirements and disposals resulted
in additional depreciation expense of ¥1,315,484 thousand,
¥2,041,347 thousand and ¥2,558,513 thousand for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
During the first quarter of 2000, the Company and its
subsidiaries approved a plan to upgrade substantially all of its
450 MHz distribution systems to 750 MHz during the years ending
December 31, 2000 and 2001. The Company identified certain
electronic components of their distribution systems that were
replaced in connection with the upgrade and, accordingly,
adjusted the remaining useful lives of such electronics in
accordance with the upgrade schedule. The effect of such changes
in the remaining useful lives resulted in additional
depreciation expense of approximately ¥484 million for
the year ended December 31, 2002. Additionally, after
giving effect to the accelerated depreciation, the net loss per
share increased by approximately ¥(123) per share for the
year ended December 31, 2002. Such upgrades had been
substantially completed by December 31, 2002.
Goodwill represents the difference between the cost of the
acquired cable television companies and amounts allocated to the
estimated fair value of their net assets. The Company performs
an assessment of goodwill for impairment at least annually, and
more frequently if an indicator of impairment has occurred,
using a two-step process. The first step requires identification
of reporting units and determination of the fair value for each
individual reporting unit. The fair value of each reporting unit
is then compared to the reporting unit’s carrying amount
including assigned goodwill. To the extent a reporting
unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the second
step of the impairment test is performed by comparing the
implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to its
carrying amount. If the implied fair value of a reporting
unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying amount, an
impairment loss is recorded. The Company performs its annual
impairment test on the first day of October in each year. The
Company has determined its reporting units to be the same as its
reportable segments. The Company had no impairment charges of
goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004.
The Company and its subsidiaries’ long-lived assets,
excluding goodwill, are reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an
asset to future net cash flows (undiscounted and without
interest) expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets
are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized
is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. Assets to
be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount
or fair value less costs to sell.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. The standard
requires that obligations associated with the retirement of
tangible long-lived assets be recorded as liabilities when those
obligations are incurred, with the amount of the liability
initially measured at fair value. The associated asset
retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount
of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2002. The Company and its subsidiaries adopted
SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003 and the adoption did not
have a material effect on its results of operations, financial
position or cash flows.
Other assets include certain development costs associated with
internal-use software capitalized, including external costs of
material and services, and payroll costs for employees devoting
time to the software projects.
IV-21
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
These costs are amortized over a period not to exceed five years
beginning when the asset is substantially ready for use. Costs
incurred during the preliminary project stage, as well as
maintenance and training costs are expensed as incurred. Other
assets also include deferred financing costs, primarily legal
fees and bank facility fees, incurred to negotiate and secure
the facility. These costs are amortized to interest expense
using the effective interest method over the term of the
facility. For additional information concerning the
Company’s debt facilities, see Note 6.
|
|
|
(i) Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company uses certain derivative financial instruments to
manage its foreign currency and interest rate exposure. The
Company may enter into forward contracts to reduce its exposure
to short-term (generally no more than one year) movements in
exchange rates applicable to firm funding commitments that are
denominated in currencies other than the Japanese yen. The
Company uses interest rate risk management derivative
instruments, such as interest rate swap and interest cap
agreements, to manage interest costs to achieve an overall
desired mix of fixed and variable rate debt. As a matter of
policy, the Company does not enter into derivative contracts for
trading or speculative purposes.
The Company accounts for its derivative instruments in
accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities and
SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative
Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an amendment of
SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 133, as amended,
requires that all derivative instruments be reported on the
balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair
value. For derivative instruments designated and effective as
fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative
instrument and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged
risk are recognized in earnings. For derivative instruments
designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of any
hedge is reported in other comprehensive income until it is
recognized in earnings in the same period in which the hedged
item affects earnings. The ineffective portion of all hedges
will be recognized in current earnings each period. Changes in
fair value of derivative instruments that are not designated as
a hedge will be recorded each period in current earnings.
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging
instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management
objective and strategy for undertaking hedge transactions. This
process includes linking all derivatives that are designated as
fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and
liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments
or forecasted transactions. The Company discontinues hedge
accounting prospectively when (1) it is determined that the
derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the
fair value of cash flows of a hedged item; (2) the
derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised;
(3) it is determined that the forecasted hedged transaction
will no longer occur; (4) a hedged firm commitment no
longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, or
(5) management determines that the designation of the
derivative as a hedge instrument is no longer appropriate.
Ongoing assessments of effectiveness are being made every three
months.
The Company had several outstanding forward contracts with a
commercial bank to hedge foreign currency exposures related to
U.S. dollar-denominated equipment purchases and other firm
commitments. As of December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, such
forward contracts had an aggregate notional amount of
¥1,553,053 thousand, ¥3,134,242 thousand and
¥5,658,147 thousand, respectively, and expire on various
dates through December 2005. The forward contracts have not been
designated as hedges as they do not meet the effectiveness
criteria specified by SFAS No. 133. However,
management believes such forward contracts are closely related
with the firm commitments designated in U.S. dollars, thus
managing associated currency risk. Forward contracts not
designated as hedges are marked to market each period. Included
in other income, net, in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations are losses on forward contracts not
designated as hedges of ¥11,589 thousand, ¥65,195
thousand and ¥72,223 thousand for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
IV-22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
In May 2003, the Company entered into several interest rate swap
agreements and an interest rate cap agreement to manage variable
rate debt as required under the terms of its facility agreement
(see Note 6). These interest rate exchange agreements
effectively convert ¥60 billion of variable rate debt
based on TIBOR into fixed rate debt and mature on June 30,
2009. These interest rate exchange agreements are considered
cash flow hedging instruments as they are expected to
effectively convert variable interest payments on certain debt
instruments into fixed payments. Changes in fair value of these
interest rate agreements designated as cash flow hedges are
reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The amounts
will be subsequently reclassified into interest expense as a
yield adjustment in the same period in which the related
interest on the variable rate debt affects earnings. The
counterparties to the interest rate exchange agreements are
banks participating in the facility agreement, therefore the
Company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of them on the
interest rate exchange agreements. In December 2004, the Company
entered into a new debt facility, which replaced its former
facility (see Note 6). Under the terms of the new facility,
the Company was required to cancel certain interest rate swap
agreements and an interest rate cap agreement with an aggregate
notional amount of ¥24 billion, as the counterparties
elected not to participate in the new facility. Such agreements
were canceled in January 2005. As a result, these agreements are
no longer considered cash flow hedging instruments and their
respective fair value changes were reclassified into interest
expense, net in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2004. The
remaining aggregate notional amount of ¥36 billion of
interest rate swap agreements have been permitted to be carried
over to the new facility as the counterparties are participants
in the new facility. The Company has re-designated such interest
swap agreements as cash flow hedging instruments.
|
|
|
(j) Severance and Retirement Plans |
The Company and its subsidiaries have unfunded noncontributory
defined benefit severance and retirement plans which are
accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 87,
Employers’ Accounting for Pensions.
(k) Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries account for income taxes under
the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in
the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment date.
(l) Cable Television
System Costs, Expenses and Revenues
The Company and its subsidiaries account for costs, expenses and
revenues applicable to the construction and operation of cable
television systems in accordance with SFAS No. 51,
Financial Reporting by Cable Television Companies.
Currently, there is no significant system that falls in a
prematurity period as defined by SFAS No. 51.
Operating and programming costs in the Company’s
consolidated statements of operations include, among other
things, cable service related expenses, billing costs, technical
and maintenance personnel and utility expenses related to the
cable television network.
(m) Revenue
Recognition
The Company and its subsidiaries recognize cable television,
high-speed Internet access, telephony and programming revenues
when such services are provided to subscribers. Revenues derived
from other sources are recognized when services are provided,
events occur or products are delivered. Initial subscriber
installation revenues are recognized in the period in which the
related services are provided to the extent of
IV-23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
direct selling costs. Any remaining amount is deferred and
recognized over the estimated average period that the
subscribers are expected to remain connected to the cable
television system. Historically, installation revenues have been
less than related direct selling costs, therefore such revenues
have been recognized as installations are completed.
The Company and its subsidiaries provide poor reception
rebroadcasting services to noncable television viewers suffering
from poor reception of television waves caused by artificial
obstacles. The Company and its subsidiaries enter into
agreements with parties that have built obstacles causing poor
reception for construction and maintenance of cable facilities
to provide such services to the affected viewers at no cost to
them during the agreement period. Under these agreements, the
Company and its subsidiaries receive up-front, lump-sum
compensation payments for construction and maintenance. Revenues
from these agreements have been deferred and are being
recognized in income on a straight-line basis over the agreement
periods which are generally 20 years. Such revenues are
included in revenue — other in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
See Note 5 for a description of revenue from affiliates
related to construction-related sales and programming fees which
are recorded in revenue — other in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
(n) Advertising
Expense
Advertising expense is charged to income as incurred.
Advertising expense amounted to ¥4,425,004 thousand,
¥3,921,229 thousand and ¥2,915,403 thousand and for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively, and is included in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
(o) Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company and its subsidiaries account for stock-based
compensation plans to employees using the intrinsic value based
method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(“APB No. 25”) and FASB Interpretation
No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving
Stock Compensation — an Interpretation of APB
No. 25. (“FIN No. 44”). As such,
compensation expense is measured on the date of grant only if
the current fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the
exercise price. The Company accounts for its stock-based
compensation plans to nonemployees and employees of
unconsolidated affiliated companies using the fair market value
based method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue 00-12, Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based
Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method
Investee (“EITF 00-12”). Under
SFAS No. 123, the fair value of the stock based award
is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing method,
which is remeasured each period end until a commitment date is
reached, which is generally the vesting date. The fair value of
the subscription rights and stock purchase warrants granted each
year was calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
with the following assumptions: no dividends, volatility of 40%,
risk-free rate of 3.0% and an expected life of three years.
Expense associated with stock-based compensation for certain
management employees is amortized on an accelerated basis over
the vesting period of the individual award consistent with the
method described in FASB Interpretation No. 28,
Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable
Stock Option or Award Plans. Otherwise, compensation expense
is generally amortized evenly over the vesting period.
Compensation expense is recorded in operating costs and expenses
for the Company’s employees and nonemployees and in equity
in earnings of affiliates for employees of affiliated companies
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
SFAS No. 123 allows companies to continue to apply the
provisions of APB No. 25, where applicable, and provide pro
forma disclosure for employee stock option grants as if the fair
value based method defined in SFAS No. 123 had been
applied. The Company has elected to continue to apply the
provisions of APB No. 25
IV-24
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
for stock-based compensation plans to its employees and provide
the pro forma disclosure required by SFAS No. 123. The
following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and
net income (loss) per share for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS
No. 123 (Yen in thousands, except share and per share
amounts):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Net income (loss), as reported
|
|
¥ |
(7,542,676 |
) |
|
¥ |
5,351,250 |
|
|
|
¥10,821,175 |
|
| |
Add stock-based compensation expense included in reported net
income (loss)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Deduct stock-based compensation expense determined under fair
value based method for all awards, net of applicable taxes
|
|
|
(510,246 |
) |
|
|
(454,172 |
) |
|
|
(607,655 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
¥ |
(8,052,922 |
) |
|
¥ |
4,897,078 |
|
|
|
¥10,213,520 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share, as reported (Yen)
|
|
|
(1,917 |
) |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
Net income (loss) per share, pro forma (Yen)
|
|
|
(2,047 |
) |
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
2,097 |
|
(p) Earnings Per
Share
Earnings per share (“EPS”) is presented in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per
Share. Under SFAS No. 128, basic EPS excludes dilution
for potential ordinary shares and is computed by dividing net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of ordinary shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to
issue ordinary shares were exercised or converted into ordinary
shares. Basic and diluted EPS are the same in 2002, 2003 and
2004, as all potential ordinary share equivalents, consisting of
stock options, are anti-dilutive.
(q) Segments
The Company reports operating segment information in accordance
with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. SFAS No. 131
defined operating segments as components of an enterprise about
which separate financial information is available that is
regularly evaluated by the chief operating decision-maker in
deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and
in assessing performance of the segment.
The Company has determined that each individual consolidated
subsidiary and unconsolidated managed equity affiliate SO is an
operating segment because each SO represents a legal entity and
serves a separate geographic area. The Company has evaluated the
criteria for aggregation of the operating segments under
paragraph 17 of SFAS No. 131 and believes it meets
each of its respective criteria. Accordingly, management has
determined that the Company has one reportable segment,
Broadband services.
(r) Use of
Estimates
Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and
assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities
and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period to
prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity
with U.S. GAAP. Significant judgments and estimates include
derivative financial instruments, depreciation and amortization
costs, impairments of property and equipment and goodwill,
income taxes and other contingencies. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
(s) Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
The FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004) (SFAS
No. 123R) in December 2004. SFAS No. 123R is a
revision of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 123R supersedes APB
No. 25 and its related implementation guidance.
IV-25
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
SFAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for
transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in
share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123R requires a
public entity to measure the cost of employee services received
in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the
grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions).
That cost will be recognized over the period during which an
employee is required to provide service in exchange for the
award. This statement is effective as of the beginning of the
first interim or annual reporting period that begins after
June 15, 2005. We have not yet determined the impact SFAS
No. 123R will have on our results of operations.
2. Acquisitions
The Company acquired varying interests in cable television
companies during the periods presented. The Company utilized the
purchase method of accounting for all such acquisitions and,
accordingly, has allocated the purchase price based on the
estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities of the
acquired companies. The assets, liabilities and operations of
such companies have been included in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements since the dates of their
respective acquisitions.
In January 2002, the Company purchased additional shares of its
affiliate J-COM Media Saitama during a capital call for
¥500,000 thousand and purchased shares from existing
shareholders of its affiliate J-COM Urawa-Yono for ¥10,080
thousand. After the purchases, the Company’s equity
ownership increased to a 50.2% controlling interest in J-COM
Media Saitama and a 50.10% controlling interest in J-COM
Urawa-Yono. These transactions have been treated as
step-acquisitions. The results of operations for both J-COM
Media Saitama and J-COM Urawa-Yono have been included as a
consolidated entity from January 1, 2002.
In March 2002, the Company purchased additional shares in its
affiliate, @NetHome Co., Ltd (“@NetHome”), from SC at
a price per share of ¥55,000 or ¥527,670 thousand and
all of the shares held by At Home Asia-Pacific for
¥1.4 billion. After the purchases, the Company had an
87.4% equity interest in @NetHome. The purchases have been
accounted for as a step-acquisition. The operations for @NetHome
have been included as a consolidated entity from April 1,
2002. In March 2004, the Company purchased from SC the remaining
outstanding shares of @NetHome for ¥4,860 million.
After the purchase, @NetHome became a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Company. The purchase has been accounted for as a
step-acquisition. The Company recorded approximately
¥4.0 billion of goodwill for the excess consideration
over the fair value of the net assets and liabilities acquired
in the 2004 step-acquisition.
In March 2004, the Company purchased a controlling interest in
Izumi Otsu from certain of its shareholders. The total purchase
price of such Izumi Otsu shares was ¥160,000 thousand and
gave the Company a 66.7% interest. The results of Izumi Otsu
have been included as a consolidated subsidiary from
April 1, 2004. In August 2004, the Company and certain
shareholders entered into an agreement and merged Izumi Otsu
into the Company’s 84.2% consolidated subsidiary, J-COM
Kansai. After the merger, the Company has an 84.0% equity
interest in J-COM Kansai.
In July 2004, the Company purchased a 100% controlling interest
in Cable System Engineering Corporation (“CSE”), whose
business is cable network construction and installation. The
total purchase price of CSE was ¥577,210 thousand. No
goodwill was recognized in connection with this acquisition. The
result of operations for CSE have been included from
August 1, 2004.
The impact to revenue, net income (loss) and net income (loss)
per share for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, as if the transactions were completed as of the beginning
of those years, is not significant.
IV-26
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
The aggregate purchase price of the business combinations during
the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2004 was allocated
based upon fair values as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Cash, receivables and other assets
|
|
¥ |
7,039,726 |
|
|
¥ |
2,073,191 |
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
16,565,501 |
|
|
|
791,856 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,690,538 |
|
|
|
4,228,117 |
|
|
Debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(15,881,589 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(6,110,058 |
) |
|
|
(1,395,471 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
5,304,118 |
|
|
¥ |
5,697,693 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Investments in Affiliates
The Company’s affiliates are engaged primarily in the
Broadband services business in Japan. At December 31, 2004,
the Company held investments in J-COM Shimonoseki (50.0%), J-COM
Fukuoka (45.0%), Jupiter VOD Co. Ltd. (50.0%), Kansai Multimedia
Service Co., Ltd. (“Kansai Multimedia”) (25.8%), CATV
Kobe (20.4%) and Green City Cable TV Corporation (20.0%).
The carrying value of investments in affiliates as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004 includes ¥730,910 thousand
and ¥761,053 thousand of unamortized excess cost of
investments over the Company’s equity in the net assets of
the affiliates. All significant intercompany profits from these
affiliates have been eliminated according to the equity method
of accounting.
The carrying value of investments in affiliates as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004 includes ¥2,019,000
thousand and ¥1,945,000 thousand of short-term loans the
Company made to certain managed affiliates. The interest rate on
these loans was 3.23% and 2.48% as of December 31, 2003 and
2004.
Condensed financial information of the Company’s
unconsolidated affiliates at December 31, 2003, and 2004
and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2002,
2003 and 2004 are as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Combined Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Property and equipment, net
|
|
¥ |
29,696,602 |
|
|
¥ |
29,578,096 |
|
| |
Other assets, net
|
|
|
6,201,251 |
|
|
|
7,545,469 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total assets
|
|
¥ |
35,897,853 |
|
|
¥ |
37,123,565 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Debt
|
|
¥ |
17,998,825 |
|
|
¥ |
15,577,345 |
|
| |
Other liabilities
|
|
|
16,030,950 |
|
|
|
17,224,152 |
|
| |
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
1,868,078 |
|
|
|
4,322,068 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
¥ |
35,897,853 |
|
|
¥ |
37,123,565 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Combined Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total revenue
|
|
¥ |
18,218,205 |
|
|
¥ |
19,776,603 |
|
|
¥ |
21,784,795 |
|
| |
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(13,001,409 |
) |
|
|
(13,430,881 |
) |
|
|
(15,080,471 |
) |
| |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(3,180,977 |
) |
|
|
(3,682,641 |
) |
|
|
(4,164,827 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,035,819 |
|
|
|
2,663,081 |
|
|
|
2,539,497 |
|
| |
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(410,278 |
) |
|
|
(478,609 |
) |
|
|
(427,400 |
) |
| |
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(558,636 |
) |
|
|
(1,013,158 |
) |
|
|
(428,107 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Net income
|
|
¥ |
1,066,905 |
|
|
¥ |
1,171,314 |
|
|
¥ |
1,683,990 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
4. Goodwill and Other Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, net, for the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 consisted of the
following (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Goodwill, net, beginning of year
|
|
¥ |
139,827,277 |
|
|
¥ |
139,853,596 |
|
|
Goodwill acquired during the year
|
|
|
26,319 |
|
|
|
4,228,117 |
|
|
Initial recognition of acquired tax benefits allocated to reduce
goodwill of acquired entities (Note 8)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,422,995 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net, end of year
|
|
¥ |
139,853,596 |
|
|
¥ |
140,658,718 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, excluding goodwill, at December 31, 2003 and
2004, consisted of the following (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Lease and other deposits
|
|
¥ |
4,295,947 |
|
|
¥ |
4,313,742 |
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
3,763,785 |
|
|
|
3,540,302 |
|
|
Capitalized computer software, net
|
|
|
3,022,557 |
|
|
|
3,351,115 |
|
|
Long-term loans receivable, net
|
|
|
300,380 |
|
|
|
270,885 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,308,582 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,664,560 |
|
|
|
1,797,757 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total other assets
|
|
¥ |
13,047,229 |
|
|
¥ |
14,582,383 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Related Party Transactions
The Company purchases cable system materials and supplies from
third-party suppliers and resells them to its subsidiaries and
affiliates. The sales to unconsolidated affiliates amounted to
¥3,484,288 thousand, ¥2,888,046 thousand and
¥2,385,495 thousand for the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and are included in
revenue — other in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
The Company provides programming services to its subsidiaries
and affiliates. The revenue from unconsolidated affiliates for
such services provided and the related products sold amounted to
¥815,287 thousand, ¥1,092,724 thousand and
¥1,379,744 thousand for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and are
included in revenue — other in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
The Company provides management services to its subsidiaries and
managed affiliates. Fees for such services related to managed
affiliates amounted to ¥390,434 thousand,
¥468,219 thousand and ¥521,670 thousand for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively, and are included in revenue — other in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
In July 2002, the Company began providing management services to
Chofu Cable Inc. (“J-COM Chofu”), an affiliated
company that is 92% jointly owned by LMI, Microsoft and SC. Fees
for such services amounted to ¥29,590 thousand,
¥60,882 thousand and ¥87,446 thousand for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
respectively, and are included in revenue — other in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As part
of the 2004 refinancing, J-COM Chofu became party to the
Company’s new debt facility (see Note 6). At
December 31, 2004, the Company had advanced
¥4,030 million of short term loans to J-COM Chofu and
the interest rate on these loans were 2.48%.
The Company purchases certain cable television programs from
Jupiter Programming Co., Ltd. (“JPC”), an affiliated
company jointly owned by SC and a wholly owned subsidiary of
LMI. Such purchases, including purchases from JPC’s
affiliates, amounted to ¥2,879,616 thousand,
¥3,155,139 thousand and ¥3,915,345 thousand
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively, and are included in operating and
IV-28
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
programming costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. Additionally, the Company receives a distribution
fee to carry the Shop Channel, a majority owned subsidiary of
JPC, for the greater of a fixed rate per subscriber or a
percentage of revenue generated through sales in the
Company’s territory. Such fees amounted to
¥614,224 thousand, ¥939,438 thousand and
¥1,063,678 thousand for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, and are
included as revenue — other in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
The Company purchased stock of affiliated companies from SC in
the amounts of ¥1,112,750 thousand,
¥0 thousand, and ¥5,091,864 thousand in the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
AJCC K.K. (“AJCC”) is a subsidiary of SC and its
primary business is the sale of home terminals and related goods
to cable television companies. Sumisho Lease Co., Ltd. and
Sumisho Auto Leasing Co., Ltd. (collectively “Sumisho
leasing”) are a subsidiary and affiliate, respectively, of
SC and provide to the Company various office equipment and
vehicles. The Company and its subsidiaries’ purchases of
such goods, primarily as capital leases, from both AJCC and
Sumisho leasing, amounted to ¥10,074,639 thousand,
¥6,087,645 thousand and ¥12,621,284 thousand
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively.
The Company pays monthly fees to its affiliates, @NetHome and
Kansai Multimedia, based on an agreed-upon percentage of
subscription revenue collected by the Company from its customers
for the @NetHome and Kansai Multimedia services. Payments made
to @NetHome under these arrangements, prior to it becoming a
consolidated subsidiary, amounted to
¥1,585,691 thousand for the years ended
December 31, 2002. Payments made to Kansai Multimedia under
these arrangements amounted to ¥2,882,494 thousand,
¥3,226,764 thousand and ¥3,380,148 thousand
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively. Such payments are included in operating and
programming costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations. In March 2002, @Net Home became a consolidated
subsidiary of the Company (see Note 2). Therefore, since
April 1, 2002, through @NetHome, the Company receives the
monthly fee from its unconsolidated affiliates. Such service
fees amounted to ¥480,356 thousand,
¥1,071,891 thousand and ¥1,242,550 thousand
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively, and are included in revenue-subscription fees in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The Company has management service agreements with SC and LMI
under which officers and management level employees are seconded
from SC and LMI to the Company, whose services are charged as
service fees to the Company based on their payroll costs. The
service fees paid to SC amounted to ¥571,319 thousand,
¥706,303 thousand and ¥784,122 thousand for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively. The service fees paid to LMI amounted to
¥761,009 thousand, ¥714,986 thousand and
¥665,354 thousand for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. These
amounts are included in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
SC, LMI and Microsoft had long-term subordinated loans to the
Company of ¥52,894,625 thousand,
¥52,894,625 thousand and
¥43,950,000 thousand, respectively, at
December 31, 2003. In December 2004, the Company refinanced
and replaced these subordinated shareholder loans under a new
facility. See Note 6.
The Company pays fees on debt guaranteed by SC, LMI and
Microsoft. The guarantee fees incurred were
¥413,128 thousand to SC, ¥361,627 thousand
to LMI and ¥285,042 thousand to Microsoft for the year
ended December 31, 2002. The guarantee fees incurred were
¥84,224 thousand to SC, ¥73,470 thousand to LMI
and ¥51,890 thousand to Microsoft for the year ended
December 31, 2003. The guarantee fees incurred were
¥41,071 thousand to SC, ¥41,071 thousand to
LMI and ¥16,332 thousand to Microsoft for the year
ended December 31, 2004. Such fees are included in interest
expense, net-related parties in the accompanying
IV-29
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
consolidated statements of operations. In December 2004 these
guarantees were replaced by a guarantee facility with a
syndicate of lenders. See Note 6.
6. Long-term Debt
A summary of long-term debt as of December 31, 2003 and
2004 is as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
¥140 billion Facility term loans, due fiscal
2005 — 2009
|
|
¥ |
53,000,000 |
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥175 billion Facility term loans, due fiscal
2005 — 2011
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
130,000,000 |
|
|
Mezzanine Facility Subordinated loan due fiscal 2012
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50,000,000 |
|
|
8 yr Shareholder Subordinated loans, due fiscal 2011
|
|
|
117,739,250 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
8 yr Shareholder Tranche B Subordinated loans, due
fiscal 2011
|
|
|
32,000,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
0% unsecured loans from Development Bank of Japan, due fiscal
2005 — 2019
|
|
|
12,223,720 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Unsecured loans from Development Bank of Japan, due fiscal
2005 — 2019, interest from 0.65% to 6.8%
|
|
|
3,895,400 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
0% secured loans from Development Bank of Japan, due fiscal
2005 — 2019
|
|
|
5,354,735 |
|
|
|
15,810,095 |
|
|
Secured loans from Development Bank of Japan, due fiscal
2005 — 2019, interest at 0.95% to 6.8%
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,614,200 |
|
|
0% unsecured loans from others, due fiscal 2012
|
|
|
57,090 |
|
|
|
50,170 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
224,270,195 |
|
|
|
199,474,465 |
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(2,438,480 |
) |
|
|
(5,385,980 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
¥ |
221,831,715 |
|
|
¥ |
194,088,485 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Financing
On January 31, 2003, the Company entered into a
¥140 billion bank syndicated facility for certain of
its managed subsidiaries and affiliates
(“¥140 billion Facility”). In connection
with the ¥140 billion Facility, on February 6,
2003, the Company entered into eight-year subordinated loans
with each of SC, LMI and Microsoft (“Principal
Shareholders”), which initially aggregated
¥182 billion (“Shareholder Subordinated
Loans”).
The ¥140 billion Facility was for the financing of
Jupiter, sixteen of its consolidated managed affiliates and one
managed affiliate accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. The financing was used for permitted general
corporate purposes, capital expenditures, financing costs and
limited purchase of minority shares and capital calls of the
affiliates participating in the ¥140 billion Facility.
The ¥140 billion Facility provided for term loans of
up to ¥120 billion and a revolving loan facility up to
¥20 billion with the final maturity of June 30,
2009. ¥32 billion of the total term loan portion of
the ¥140 billion Facility was considered provided by
the shareholders under the Tranche B Subordinated Loans.
Interest was based on TIBOR, as defined in the
¥140 billion Facility, plus margin which changed based
upon a leverage ratio of Total Debt to EBITDA as set forth in
the ¥140 billion Facility agreement. At
December 31, 2003, the interest rate was 2.83%. The
Shareholder Subordinated Loans, which were subordinated to the
¥140 billion Facility, consisted of eight-year
subordinated loans and eight-year Tranche B Subordinated
Loans. The ¥140 billion Facility had requirements to
make mandatory prepayments under specific circumstances as
defined in the agreements. Such prepayments are designated as
restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets.
In May 2003, LMI and SC converted ¥32 billion of
Shareholder Subordinated Loans for 750,250 shares of common
stock of the company. At December 31, 2003, the interest
rate was 2.08%.
IV-30
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
In December 2003, a consolidated subsidiary of the Company
became party to the ¥140 billion Facility. Immediately
prior to this transaction, the consolidated subsidiary had
outstanding ¥3,686,090 thousand to third-party
creditors. In connection with this transaction, a third-party
debt holder forgave ¥400,000 thousand of debt owed to
it. As a result, the Company recorded a gain of
¥400,000 thousand in other non-operating income in the
accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2003. Additionally, the third-party debt
holder was issued ¥500,000 thousand of preferred stock
of the consolidated subsidiary in exchange for
¥500,000 thousand of debt owed to it (see
Note 10). The remaining ¥2,686,090 thousand of
third-party debt was repaid from proceeds of the
¥140 billion Facility.
In March 2004, the Company entered into additional shareholder
subordinated loans of ¥2,431,000 thousand each with SC
and LMI. The aggregate ¥4,862,000 thousand of loan
proceeds were used for the purchase of the remaining shares of
@NetHome (see Note 2). These additional shareholder
subordinated loans had identical terms to the Shareholder
Subordinated Loans discussed above.
In August 2004, LMI, SC and Microsoft made a capital
contribution to the Company in the aggregate amount of
¥30,000 million. The proceeds of this contribution
were used to repay an aggregate of ¥30,000 million of
Shareholder Subordinated Loans owed respectively in the same
amounts as contributed by LMI, SC and Microsoft (see
Note 1).
2004 Refinancing
On December 15, 2004, for the purpose of the refinancing
the ¥140 billion Facility, the Company entered into a
¥175 billion senior syndicated facility
(“¥175 billion Facility”) which consists of
a ¥130 billion term loan facility (“Term Loan
Facility”), a ¥20 billion revolving facility
(“Revolving Facility”) and a ¥25 billion
guarantee facility (“Guarantee Facility”).
Concurrently the Company entered into a ¥50 billion
subordinated syndicated loan facility (“Mezzanine
Facility”). Consistent with the ¥140 billion
Facility, the ¥175 billion Facility will be utilized
for the financing of Jupiter, sixteen of its consolidated
managed affiliates, one managed affiliate under the equity
method accounting and one managed affiliate, which the Company
has no equity investment (“Jupiter Combined Group”).
On December 21, 2004, the Company made full drawdowns from
each of the ¥130 billion Term Loan Facility and the
¥50 billion Mezzanine Facility. The proceeds from the
December 2004 drawdown were used to repay all outstanding loans
under the ¥140 billion Facility and all outstanding
Shareholder Subordinated Loans.
The ¥130 billion Term Loan Facility consists of a five
year ¥90 billion Tranche A Term Loan Facility
(“Tranche A Facility”) and a seven year
¥40 billion Tranche B Term Loan Facility
(“Tranche B Facility”). Final maturity dates of
the Tranche A Facility and Tranche B Facility are
December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Loan repayment of the Tranche A Facility and the
Tranche B Facility commence on September 30, 2005 and
March 31, 2009, respectively, each based on a defined rate
reduction each quarter thereafter until maturity.
The ¥20 billion Revolving Facility will be available
for drawdown until one month prior to its final maturity of
December 31, 2009. A commitment fee of 0.50% per annum is
payable on the unused available Revolving Facility during its
availability period.
The ¥25 billion Guarantee Facility provides for seven
years of bank guarantees on loans from the Development Bank of
Japan owed by affiliates of the Jupiter Combined Group. The
Guarantee Facility commitment reduces gradually according to the
amount and schedule as defined in the ¥175 billion
Facility agreement until final maturity at December 31,
2011. As of December 31, 2004 the guarantee commitment is
¥25 billion. Such guarantee commitment will be reduced
to ¥23.1 billion by December 2005;
¥21.6 billion by December 2006;
¥20.0 billion by December 2007;
¥18.6 billion by December 2008;
¥17.2 billion by December 2009;
¥15.8 billion by December 2010; and to
¥13.2 billion by December 2011. A commitment fee of
0.50% per annum is payable on the unused available Guarantee
Facility during its availability period.
IV-31
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
Interest on the Tranche A Facility, Tranche B Facility
and the Revolving Facility is based on TIBOR, as defined in the
agreement, plus the applicable margin. Each facility’s
applicable margin is reducing based upon a leverage ratio of
Senior Debt to EBITDA as such terms are defined in the
¥175 billion Facility agreement. When the leverage
ratio is greater than or equal to 4.0:1, the margin on the
Tranche A Facility and the Revolving Facility is 1.50% per
annum and the margin of the Tranche B Facility ranges from
1.80% to 2.00% per annum; when less than 4.0:1 but greater than
or equal to 2.5:1 the margin on the Tranche A Facility and
the Revolving Facility is 1.38% per annum and the margin of the
Tranche B Facility ranges from 1.69% to 1.88% per annum;
when less than 2.5:1 but greater than or equal to 1.5:1 the
margin on the Tranche A Facility and the Revolving Facility
is 1.25% per annum and the margin of the Tranche B Facility
ranges from 1.58% to 1.75% per annum; and when less than 1.5:1
the margin on the Tranche A Facility and the Revolving
Facility is 1.00% per annum and the margin of the Tranche B
Facility ranges from 1.35% to 1.50% per annum. In regards to the
fees due on the Guarantee Facility, when the leverage ratio is
greater than 4.00:1, the interest rate is 3.00% per annum; when
less than 4.00:1 but greater than or equal to 3.75:1 the
interest rate is 2.00%; when less than 3.75:1 but greater than
or equal to 3.50:1 the interest rate is 1.50%; when less than
3.50:1 but greater than or equal to 3.00:1 the interest rate is
1.00%; when less than 3.00:1 but greater than or equal to 2.00:1
the interest rate is 0.75%; and when less than 2.00:1, the
interest rate is 0.50% per annum. As of December 31, 2004
the interest rates for the outstanding Tranche A Facility,
Tranche B Facility, and Guarantee Facility, were 1.6%,
1.9%, and 1.0% respectively.
The ¥175 billion Facility has requirements to make
mandatory prepayments in the amount equal to (1) 50% of the
Group Free Cash Flow, as defined in the agreement, until the
later of (a) March 31, 2007 and (b) the first
quarter for which the ratio of Senior Debt to EBITDA, as defined
in the agreement, is less than 2.50:1.00; (2) 50% of third
party contributions received when the ratio of Senior Debt to
EBITDA is greater than 4.00:1.00; (3) proceeds from the
sale of assets exceeding ¥500 million that are not
reinvested within six months; (4) insurance proceeds
exceeding ¥500 million that are not used to repair or
replace the damaged assets within twelve months; and
(5) proceeds of any take-out securities as defined in the
¥175 billion Facility agreement. The
¥175 billion Facility requires the Jupiter Combined
Group to comply with various financial covenants, such as
Maximum Senior Debt to EBITDA Ratio, Maximum Senior Debt to
Combined Total Capital Ratio, Minimum Debt Service Coverage
Ratio and Minimum Interest Coverage Ratio as such terms are
defined in the ¥175 billion Facility agreement. In
addition, the ¥175 billion Facility contains certain
limitations or prohibitions on additional indebtedness.
Additionally, the ¥175 billion Facility requires the
Company to maintain interest hedging agreements on at least 50%
of the outstanding amounts under the Tranche A Facility.
Due to the ¥175 billion Facility closing on
December 15, 2004, the Company was not required to
calculate financial covenants for the fiscal year 2004.
The Mezzanine Facility contains a bullet repayment upon final
maturity at June 30, 2012. However, in the event of an IPO
by the Company, there is a mandatory prepayment of the Mezzanine
Facility of 100% from the proceeds of such IPO. Interest on the
Mezzanine Facility is based on TIBOR, as defined in the
agreement, plus an increasing margin. The initial margin is
3.25% per annum and increases 0.25% each successive three month
period from closing up to a maximum margin of 9.00% per annum.
The Mezzanine Facility has identical financial covenants as the
¥175 billion Facility.
As of December 31, 2004 the Company had
¥20 billion revolving loans available for immediate
borrowing under the ¥175 billion Facility.
Development Bank of Japan Loans
The loans represent institutional loans from the Development
Bank of Japan, which have been made available to
telecommunication companies operating in specific local areas
designated as “Teletopia” by the MIC to facilitate
development of local telecommunication network. Requirements to
qualify for such financing include use of optical fiber cables,
equity participation by local/municipal government and guarantee
by third parties,
IV-32
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
among other things. These loans are obtained by the
Company’s subsidiaries and were primarily guaranteed,
directly or indirectly, by SC, LMI and Microsoft. In connection
with the 2004 refinancing described above, the guarantees by SC,
LMI and Microsoft have been cancelled and replaced with
guarantees pursuant to the Guarantee Facility.
Securities on Long-term Debt
At December 31, 2004, subsidiaries’ shares owned by
the Company, trademark and franchise rights held by the Company
and substantially all equipment held by the Company’s
subsidiaries were pledged to secure the loans from the
Development Bank of Japan and the Company’s bank
facilities. The aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt
outstanding at December 31, 2004 are as follows (Yen in
thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
| Year ending December 31, |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2005
|
|
¥ |
5,385,980 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
11,648,720 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
20,461,660 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
31,474,610 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
42,981,060 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
87,522,435 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
199,474,465 |
|
| |
|
|
|
7. Leases
The Company and its subsidiaries are obligated under various
capital leases, primarily for home terminals, and other
noncancelable operating leases, which expire at various dates
during the next seven years. See Note 5 for further
discussion of capital leases from subsidiaries and affiliates of
SC.
At December 31, 2003 and 2004, the amount of equipment and
related accumulated depreciation recorded under capital leases
were as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Distribution system and equipment
|
|
¥ |
45,170,512 |
|
|
¥ |
48,061,224 |
|
|
Support equipment and buildings
|
|
|
6,656,913 |
|
|
|
6,594,499 |
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(22,111,664 |
) |
|
|
(24,129,460 |
) |
|
Other assets, at cost, net of depreciation
|
|
|
292,511 |
|
|
|
209,669 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
30,008,272 |
|
|
¥ |
30,735,932 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of assets under capital leases is included in
depreciation and amortization in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
IV-33
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
Future minimum lease payments under capital leases and
noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2004 are
as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Capital | |
|
Operating | |
| Year ending December 31, |
|
Leases | |
|
Leases | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
2005
|
|
¥ |
10,479,258 |
|
|
¥ |
901,131 |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
8,298,826 |
|
|
|
750,754 |
|
| |
2007
|
|
|
5,997,212 |
|
|
|
626,332 |
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
4,102,122 |
|
|
|
399,496 |
|
| |
2009
|
|
|
2,810,622 |
|
|
|
383,100 |
|
| |
More than five years
|
|
|
2,686,635 |
|
|
|
703,288 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
34,374,675 |
|
|
¥ |
3,764,101 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: amount representing interest (rates ranging from 1.10% to
5.99%)
|
|
|
(2,570,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum payments
|
|
|
31,804,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(9,529,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent portion
|
|
¥ |
22,275,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries occupy certain offices under
cancelable lease arrangements. Rental expenses for such leases
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
totaled ¥4,115,628 thousand, ¥4,134,249 thousand and
¥3,970,228 thousand, respectively, and were included in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations. Also, the Company and its
subsidiaries occupy certain transmission facilities and use
poles and other equipment under cancelable lease arrangements.
Rental expenses for such leases for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, totaled ¥7,323,538
thousand, ¥8,542,845 thousand and ¥8,943,602 thousand,
respectively, and are included in operating costs and
programming costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
8. Income Taxes
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to Japanese
national corporate tax of 30%, an inhabitant tax of 6% and a
deductible enterprise tax of 10%, which in aggregate result in a
statutory tax rate of 42%. On March 24, 2003, the Japanese
Diet approved the Amendments to Local Tax Law, reducing the
enterprise tax from 10.08% to 7.2%. The amendments to the tax
rates will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
April 1, 2004. Consequently, the statutory income tax rate
will be lowered to approximately 40% for deferred tax assets and
liabilities expected to be settled or realized on or after
January 1, 2005 for the Company.
All pretax income/loss and related tax expense/benefit are
derived solely from Japanese operations. Income tax expense for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as
follows (Yen in thousand):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Current
|
|
¥ |
256,763 |
|
|
¥ |
209,805 |
|
|
¥ |
1,812,786 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
45,591 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income tax expense
|
|
¥ |
256,763 |
|
|
¥ |
209,805 |
|
|
¥ |
1,858,377 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-34
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
The effective rates of income tax (benefit) expense
relating to losses (income) incurred differs from the rate
that would result from applying the normal statutory tax rates
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as
follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Normal effective statutory tax rate
|
|
|
(42.0)% |
|
|
|
42.0% |
|
|
|
42.0% |
|
| |
Adjustment to deferred tax assets and liabilities for enacted
changes in tax laws and rates
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
| |
Increase/(decrease) in valuation allowance
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
(41.2 |
) |
|
|
(27.4 |
) |
| |
Other
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
3.5% |
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
|
14.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of temporary differences and carryforwards that give
rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31,
2003 and 2004 are as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating loss carryforwards
|
|
¥ |
29,921,448 |
|
|
¥ |
21,649,833 |
|
| |
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
14,165,581 |
|
|
|
14,455,010 |
|
| |
Lease obligation
|
|
|
12,452,252 |
|
|
|
12,721,820 |
|
| |
Retirement and other allowances
|
|
|
1,390,741 |
|
|
|
1,459,068 |
|
| |
Investment in affiliates
|
|
|
794,896 |
|
|
|
567,766 |
|
| |
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
2,485,228 |
|
|
|
3,978,505 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
61,210,146 |
|
|
|
54,832,002 |
|
| |
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(45,846,086 |
) |
|
|
(35,240,909 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
15,364,060 |
|
|
|
19,591,093 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Property and equipment
|
|
|
12,680,631 |
|
|
|
13,796,923 |
|
| |
Tax deductible goodwill
|
|
|
633,155 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
2,050,274 |
|
|
|
2,416,766 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
15,364,060 |
|
|
|
16,213,689 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
3,377,404 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net changes in the total valuation allowance for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were decreases of
¥8,985,905 thousand, ¥6,543,162 thousand and
¥10,605,177 thousand, respectively.
Current deferred tax assets in the amount of ¥2,068,822
thousand are included in prepaid expenses and non-current
deferred tax assets in the amount of ¥1,308,582 thousand
are included in other in non-current assets in the accompanied
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the
Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent
upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods
in which those temporary differences become deductible. The
Company considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax
liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning
strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of
historical taxable income and projections for future taxable
income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are
deductible, management expects to realize its deferred tax
assets net of existing valuation allowance. The Company had
¥343,918 thousand of tax deductible goodwill as of
December 31, 2004.
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31,
2003 and 2004 acquired in connection with business combinations
were ¥12,000 million and ¥7,267 million (net
of ¥3,423 million recognized during 2004),
IV-35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
respectively. If the deferred tax assets are realized or the
valuation allowance is reversed, the tax benefit realized is
first applied to i) reduce to zero any goodwill related to
acquisition, ii) second to reduce to zero other non-current
intangible assets related to the acquisition and iii) third
to reduce income tax expense. See Note 4.
At December 31, 2004, the Company and its subsidiaries had
net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of
¥54,124,581 thousand which were available to offset
future taxable income. Net operating loss carryforwards, if not
utilized, will expire in each of the next five years as follows
(Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
| Year ending December 31, |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2005
|
|
¥ |
17,501,242 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
20,094,037 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
— |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
55,494 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10,751,591 |
|
|
2010-2011
|
|
|
5,722,217 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
54,124,581 |
|
| |
|
|
|
9. Severance and Retirement Plans
Under unfunded severance and retirement plans, substantially all
full-time employees terminating their employment after the three
year vesting period are entitled, under most circumstances, to
lump-sum severance payments determined by reference to their
rate of pay at the time of termination, years of service and
certain other factors. No assumptions are made for future
compensation levels as the plans have flat-benefit formulas. As
a result, the accumulated benefit obligation and projected
benefit obligation are the same. December 31, 2004 was used
as the measurement date.
Net periodic cost of the Company and its subsidiaries’
plans accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 87 for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, included
the following components (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Service cost — benefits earned during the year
|
|
¥ |
205,094 |
|
|
¥ |
257,230 |
|
|
¥ |
265,608 |
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
35,074 |
|
|
|
40,159 |
|
|
|
40,120 |
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
232,507 |
|
|
|
158,371 |
|
|
|
463,216 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost
|
|
¥ |
472,675 |
|
|
¥ |
455,760 |
|
|
¥ |
768,944 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of the
benefit obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries’
plans accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 87 are
as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, beginning of year
|
|
¥ |
1,606,371 |
|
|
¥ |
2,006,011 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
257,230 |
|
|
|
265,608 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
40,159 |
|
|
|
40,120 |
|
|
Acquisitions (Note 2)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,630 |
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
158,371 |
|
|
|
432,586 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(56,120 |
) |
|
|
(93,288 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, end of year
|
|
¥ |
2,006,011 |
|
|
¥ |
2,681,667 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-36
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
The weighted-average discount rate used in the determination of
projected benefit obligation and net pension cost of the Company
and its subsidiaries’ plans as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| Projected benefit obligation |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
2.5% |
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
Net pension cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
The estimated future benefit payments are (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
| Estimated Future Benefit Payments |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
2005
|
|
¥ |
105,753 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
116,145 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
172,494 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
167,641 |
|
|
2010 to 2014
|
|
|
996,298 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
1,696,331 |
|
| |
|
|
|
In addition, employees of the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries participate in a multi-employer defined benefit
plan. The Company contributions to this plan amounted to
¥324,521 thousand, ¥342,521 thousand and ¥292,546
thousand for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, respectively, and are included in provision for retirement
allowance in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
10. Redeemable Preferred Stock
On December 29, 2003, in connection with being included as
a party to the ¥140 billion Facility, a consolidated
subsidiary of the Company issued ¥500,000 thousand of
preferred stock to a third-party in exchange for debt owed to
that third party. All or a part of the preferred stock can be
redeemed after 2010, up to a half of the preceding year’s
net income, at the holder’s demand. The holder of the
preferred stock has a priority to receive dividends, however,
the amount of such dividends will be decided by the
subsidiary’s board of directors and such dividend will not
exceed ¥1,000 per preferred stock for any fiscal year and
will not accumulate.
11. Shareholders’ Equity
Under the Japanese Commercial Code (the “Code”), the
amount available for dividends is based on retained earnings as
recorded on the books of the Company maintained in conformity
with financial accounting standards of Japan. Certain
adjustments not recorded on the Company’s books are
reflected in the consolidated financial statements for reasons
described in Note 1. At December 31, 2004, the
accumulated deficit recorded on the Company’s books of
account was ¥16,024,828 thousand. Therefore, no dividends
may be paid at the present time.
The Code provides that an amount equivalent to at least 10% of
cash dividends paid and other cash outlays resulting from
appropriation of retained earnings be appropriated to a legal
reserve until such reserve and the additional paid-in capital
equal 25% of the issued capital. The Code also provides that
neither additional paid-in capital nor the legal reserve are to
be used for cash dividends, but may be either (i) used to
reduce a capital deficit, by resolution of the shareholders;
(ii) capitalized, by resolution of the Board of Directors;
or (iii) used
IV-37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
for purposes other than those provided in (i) and (ii),
such as refund made to shareholders or acquisition of treasury
stocks, but only up to an amount equal to the additional paid-in
capital and the legal reserve less 25% of the issued capital, by
resolution of the shareholders. The Code provides that at least
one-half of the issue price of new shares be included in capital.
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
The Company maintains subscription-rights option plans and stock
purchase warrant plans for certain directors, corporate auditors
and employees of the Company’s consolidated managed
franchises and to directors, corporate auditors and employees of
the Company’s unconsolidated managed franchises and other
non-employees (collectively the “Jupiter Option
Plans”). The Company’s board of directors and
shareholders approved the grant of the Company’s ordinary
shares at an initial exercise price of ¥92,000 per share.
The exercise price is subject to adjustment upon an effective
IPO to the lower of ¥92,000 per share or the IPO offering
price.
Under Jupiter Option Plans, the number of ordinary shares
issuable will be adjusted for stock splits, reverse stock splits
and certain other recapitalizations and the subscription rights
will not be exercisable until the Company’s ordinary shares
are registered with the Japan Securities Dealers Association or
listed on a stock exchange. Non-management employees will,
unless the grant agreement provides otherwise, vest in two years
from date of grant. Management employees will, unless the grant
agreement provides otherwise, vest in four equal installments
from date of grant. Options under the Jupiter Option Plans
generally expire 10 years from date of grant, currently
ranging from August 23, 2010 to August 23, 2012.
The Company has accounted for awards granted to the
Company’s and its consolidated managed franchises’
directors, corporate auditors and employees under APB
No. 25 and FIN No. 44. Based on the
Company’s estimated fair value per ordinary share, there
was no intrinsic value at the date of grant under the Jupiter
Option Plans. As the exercise price at the date of grant is
uncertain, the Jupiter Option Plans are considered variable
awards. Under APB No. 25 and FIN 44, variable awards
will have stock compensation recognized each period to the
extent the market value of the ordinary shares granted exceeds
the exercise price. The Company will be subject to variable
accounting for grants to employees under the Jupiter Option
Plans until all options granted are exercised, forfeited, or
expired. At December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, the market
value of the Company’s ordinary shares did not exceed the
exercise price and no compensation expense was recognized.
The Company has accounted for awards granted to directors,
corporate auditors and employees of the Company’s
unconsolidated managed franchises and to other non-employees, in
accordance with SFAS No. 123 and EITF 00-12. As a
result of cancellations, options outstanding to directors,
corporate auditors and employees of the Company’s
unconsolidated managed franchises and to other non-employees
were 23,338 ordinary shares, 21,916 ordinary shares and 11,476
ordinary shares at December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively. The Company recorded compensation expense related
to the directors, corporate auditors and employees of the
Company’s unconsolidated managed franchises and other
non-employees of ¥64,058 thousand, ¥117,359 thousand
and ¥93,484 thousand for the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively, which has been included in
selling, general and administrative expense for the
Company’s non-employees and in equity in earnings of
affiliates for employees of affiliated companies in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
IV-38
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
The following table summarizes activity under the Jupiter Option
Plans:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Outstanding at beginning of the year
|
|
|
132,712 |
|
|
|
159,004 |
|
|
|
191,764 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
30,576 |
|
|
|
41,958 |
|
|
|
29,730 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(4,284 |
) |
|
|
(9,198 |
) |
|
|
(8,418 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of the year
|
|
|
159,004 |
|
|
|
191,764 |
|
|
|
213,076 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average exercise price
|
|
¥ |
92,000 |
|
|
¥ |
92,000 |
|
|
¥ |
92,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual life
|
|
|
8.0 years |
|
|
|
7.4 years |
|
|
|
6.6 years |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable, end of period
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted
|
|
¥ |
14,604 |
|
|
¥ |
18,340 |
|
|
¥ |
24,545 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For financial instruments other than long-term loans, lease
obligations and interest rate swap agreements, the carrying
amount approximates fair value because of the short maturity of
these instruments. Based on the borrowing rates currently
available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and
average maturities, the fair value of long-term debt and capital
lease obligations at December 31, 2003 and 2004 are as
follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
| |
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
¥ |
224,270,195 |
|
|
¥ |
220,114,532 |
|
|
|
¥199,474,465 |
|
|
|
¥199,127,222 |
|
|
Lease obligation
|
|
|
31,130,629 |
|
|
|
32,328,048 |
|
|
|
31,804,551 |
|
|
|
30,125,734 |
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
694,745 |
|
|
|
694,745 |
|
|
|
8,204 |
|
|
|
8,204 |
|
13. Supplemental Disclosures to Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Yen in thousands) | |
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest
|
|
¥ |
4,696,332 |
|
|
¥ |
4,408,426 |
|
|
¥ |
8,588,285 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Income tax
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
378,116 |
|
|
¥ |
323,144 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash acquisitions of new subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fair value of assets acquired
|
|
¥ |
20,135,417 |
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
1,688,442 |
|
| |
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
21,991,647 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,245,532 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Cash paid, net of cash acquired
|
|
¥ |
(1,856,230 |
) |
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
442,910 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property acquired under capital leases during the year
|
|
¥ |
10,990,909 |
|
|
¥ |
6,057,250 |
|
|
¥ |
12,561,285 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of long-term debt into equity
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
32,260,750 |
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Commitments
In connection with the September 1, 2000 acquisition of
Titus Communications Corporation (“Titus”), Microsoft
and the Company entered into a gain recognition agreement with
respect to the Titus shares and assets acquired. The Company
agreed not to sell during any 18-month period, without Microsoft
consent, any shares of Titus, or sell any of Titus’ assets,
valued at $35 million or more, in a transaction that would
result in taxable income to Microsoft. Microsoft will retain
this consent right until the earlier of June 30, 2006 or the
IV-39
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUPITER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO., LTD. AND
SUBSIDIARIES — (Continued)
date Microsoft owns less than 5% of the Company’s ordinary
shares and Microsoft has sold, in taxable transactions, 80% of
the Company’s ordinary shares issued to it in connection
with the Titus acquisition.
The Company has guaranteed payment of certain bank loans for its
equity method affiliate investee, CATV Kobe, and its cost method
investee Bay Communications Inc. The guarantees are based on an
agreed-upon proportionate share of the bank loans among certain
of the entities’ shareholders, considering each of their
respective equity interest. The term of the guarantee ranges
from 5 to 12 years and the aggregate guaranteed amounts
were ¥796,233 thousand, ¥722,531 thousand
and ¥179,072 thousand as of December 31, 2002,
2003 and 2004, respectively. Management believes that the
likelihood the Company would be required to perform or otherwise
incur any significant losses associated with any of these
guarantees is remote.
15. Subsequent Events
On February 9, 2005, the Company entered into a share
purchase agreement to purchase from Microsoft, LMI, and SC all
of their interest in J-COM Chofu, as well as all of the equity
interest owned by Microsoft in Tu-Ka Cellular Tokyo, Inc. and
Tu-Ka Cellular Tokai, Inc. (“Tu-Ka”) on or about
February 25, 2005. The Company will pay approximately
$24 million (approximately ¥2,500 million) to
Microsoft, approximately ¥972 million to LMI and
approximately ¥940 million to SC for their respective
Chofu or Tu-Ka shares. Consideration for J-COM Chofu shares will
be in cash at closing, and the Tu-Ka shares will be transferred
in exchange for a non-interest-bearing promissory note to
Microsoft that is payable 5 business days after a
successful IPO in Japan by the Company.
IV-40
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Jupiter Programming Co. Ltd.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Jupiter Programming Co. Ltd. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in
the two-year period ended December 31, 2004. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Jupiter Programming Co., Ltd. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Tokyo, Japan
March 4, 2005
IV-41
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2003 and 2004
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Yen in thousands) | |
|
ASSETS |
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
¥ |
2,350,000 |
|
|
¥ |
3,100,000 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,554,768 |
|
|
|
2,252,611 |
|
| |
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of
¥10,618 thousand in 2003 and ¥7,723 thousand in 2004):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Related party
|
|
|
307,160 |
|
|
|
380,826 |
|
| |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,036,190 |
|
|
|
4,298,811 |
|
| |
Retail inventories
|
|
|
2,235,952 |
|
|
|
2,999,404 |
|
| |
Program rights and language versioning, net (Note 3)
|
|
|
646,758 |
|
|
|
599,480 |
|
| |
Deferred income taxes (Note 13)
|
|
|
1,165,550 |
|
|
|
1,334,560 |
|
| |
Prepaid and other current assets
|
|
|
378,606 |
|
|
|
401,840 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
12,674,984 |
|
|
|
15,367,532 |
|
|
Investments (Note 4)
|
|
|
3,359,563 |
|
|
|
6,929,961 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net (Note 5)
|
|
|
2,012,286 |
|
|
|
5,327,068 |
|
|
Software development costs, net (Note 6)
|
|
|
1,450,388 |
|
|
|
1,902,244 |
|
|
Program rights and language versioning, excluding current
portion, net (Note 3)
|
|
|
140,372 |
|
|
|
86,289 |
|
|
Goodwill (Note 8)
|
|
|
188,945 |
|
|
|
470,131 |
|
|
Other intangible assets, net (Note 7)
|
|
|
59,393 |
|
|
|
251,959 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 13)
|
|
|
236,975 |
|
|
|
357,606 |
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
506,321 |
|
|
|
680,365 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
¥ |
20,629,227 |
|
|
¥ |
31,373,155 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-42
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS — (Continued)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(Yen in thousands) | |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Short-term debt (Note 12)
|
|
¥ |
46,000 |
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
| |
Obligations under capital leases, current installments (related
party) (Note 11)
|
|
|
329,764 |
|
|
|
290,031 |
|
| |
Accounts payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
|
485,416 |
|
|
|
557,851 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
3,722,456 |
|
|
|
4,848,307 |
|
| |
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
|
232,172 |
|
|
|
276,938 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,228,563 |
|
|
|
1,515,453 |
|
| |
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
1,516,200 |
|
|
|
2,191,203 |
|
| |
Advances from affiliate
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
938,000 |
|
| |
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
517,910 |
|
|
|
512,501 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
8,078,481 |
|
|
|
11,130,284 |
|
|
Long-term debt (Note 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
|
2,016,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
Obligations under capital leases, excluding current installments
(related party) (Note 11)
|
|
|
174,946 |
|
|
|
823,170 |
|
|
Accrued pension and severance cost (Note 14)
|
|
|
216,611 |
|
|
|
284,796 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 13)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
81,380 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
14,486,038 |
|
|
|
17,319,630 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
1,539,900 |
|
|
|
3,055,893 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity (Note 15):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Common stock, no par value; 2003 — authorized
450,000 shares; issued and outstanding 336,680 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2004 — authorized 460,000 shares; issued and
outstanding 360,680 shares
|
|
|
16,834,000 |
|
|
|
11,434,000 |
|
| |
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,788,054 |
|
| |
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(12,230,711 |
) |
|
|
(7,207,717 |
) |
| |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,705 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
4,603,289 |
|
|
|
10,997,632 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
¥ |
20,629,227 |
|
|
¥ |
31,373,155 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
IV-43
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(Yen in thousands) | |
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Retail sales, net
|
|
¥ |
27,432,871 |
|
|
¥ |
38,699,329 |
|
|
¥ |
50,010,854 |
|
| |
Television programming revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
|
1,457,731 |
|
|
|
1,655,215 |
|
|
|
1,762,782 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
4,247,036 |
|
|
|
5,802,030 |
|
|
|
6,664,584 |
|
| |
Services and other revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
|
524,849 |
|
|
|
755,244 |
|
|
|
866,157 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
634,336 |
|
|
|
906,453 |
|
|
|
1,176,418 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
34,296,823 |
|
|
|
47,818,271 |
|
|
|
60,480,795 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cost of retail sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
|
1,251,413 |
|
|
|
1,597,880 |
|
|
|
2,212,430 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
15,141,176 |
|
|
|
21,658,902 |
|
|
|
28,038,763 |
|
| |
Cost of programming and distribution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
|
851,475 |
|
|
|
2,487,545 |
|
|
|
2,742,401 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
5,417,193 |
|
|
|
6,271,783 |
|
|
|
7,482,238 |
|
| |
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
|
895,979 |
|
|
|
943,439 |
|
|
|
1,318,449 |
|
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
6,728,610 |
|
|
|
8,532,952 |
|
|
|
10,084,322 |
|
| |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,107,040 |
|
|
|
1,210,163 |
|
|
|
1,380,432 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
31,392,886 |
|
|
|
42,702,664 |
|
|
|
53,259,035 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,903,937 |
|
|
|
5,115,607 |
|
|
|
7,221,760 |
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Related party
|
|
|
(77,899 |
) |
|
|
(60,073 |
) |
|
|
(45,258 |
) |
| |
|
Other
|
|
|
(74,482 |
) |
|
|
(66,204 |
) |
|
|
(77,245 |
) |
| |
Foreign exchange (loss) gain
|
|
|
(309,017 |
) |
|
|
(141,368 |
) |
|
|
126,572 |
|
| |
Equity in (losses) income of equity method affiliates
(Note 4)
|
|
|
(163,758 |
) |
|
|
(64,472 |
) |
|
|
22,888 |
|
| |
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(214,087 |
) |
|
|
9,763 |
|
|
|
(9,241 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) income
|
|
|
(839,243 |
) |
|
|
(322,354 |
) |
|
|
17,716 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
2,064,694 |
|
|
|
4,793,253 |
|
|
|
7,239,476 |
|
|
Income tax expense (Note 13)
|
|
|
(703,947 |
) |
|
|
(1,519,225 |
) |
|
|
(2,951,446 |
) |
|
Minority interests in earnings, net of tax
|
|
|
(343,027 |
) |
|
|
(608,738 |
) |
|
|
(1,077,972 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
¥ |
1,017,720 |
|
|
¥ |
2,665,290 |
|
|
¥ |
3,210,058 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
IV-44
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(Yen in thousands) | |
|
Common stock (Note 15):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
¥ |
16,834,000 |
|
|
¥ |
16,834,000 |
|
|
¥ |
16,834,000 |
|
| |
Transfer from common stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(8,400,000 |
) |
| |
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
16,834,000 |
|
|
|
16,834,000 |
|
|
|
11,434,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital (Note 15):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Transfer from common stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,587,064 |
|
| |
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
| |
Carryover basis adjustment related to LJS acquisition
(Note 2)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,799,010 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,788,054 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
(15,913,721 |
) |
|
|
(14,896,001 |
) |
|
|
(12,230,711 |
) |
| |
Transfer from common stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,812,936 |
|
| |
Net income
|
|
|
1,017,720 |
|
|
|
2,665,290 |
|
|
|
3,210,058 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
(14,896,001 |
) |
|
|
(12,230,711 |
) |
|
|
(7,207,717 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
Unrecognized losses on derivative instruments (Note 9):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Unrealized holding losses arising during the year, net of tax
benefit, ¥11,460 thousand in 2004
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,705 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,705 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Redemption of common stock, to be held as treasury stock
(Note 15)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6,000,000 |
) |
| |
Issuance of treasury stock related to LJS acquisition
(Note 2)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Balance at end of year
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
¥ |
1,937,999 |
|
|
¥ |
4,603,289 |
|
|
¥ |
10,997,632 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income for the year
|
|
¥ |
1,017,720 |
|
|
¥ |
2,665,290 |
|
|
¥ |
3,210,058 |
|
| |
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax benefit,
¥11,460 thousand in 2004
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(16,705 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total comprehensive income
|
|
¥ |
1,017,720 |
|
|
¥ |
2,665,290 |
|
|
¥ |
3,193,353 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
IV-45
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
(Yen in thousands) | |
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income
|
|
¥ |
1,017,720 |
|
|
¥ |
2,665,290 |
|
|
¥ |
3,210,058 |
|
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,107,040 |
|
|
|
1,210,163 |
|
|
|
1,380,432 |
|
| |
|
Amortization of program rights and language versioning
|
|
|
1,298,054 |
|
|
|
1,570,670 |
|
|
|
1,732,435 |
|
| |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
1,975 |
|
|
|
(3,519 |
) |
| |
|
Equity in losses (income) of equity method affiliates
|
|
|
163,758 |
|
|
|
64,472 |
|
|
|
(22,888 |
) |
| |
|
Write-down of cost method investment
|
|
|
215,650 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(536,017 |
) |
|
|
(553,039 |
) |
|
|
(278,181 |
) |
| |
|
Minority interest in earnings
|
|
|
343,027 |
|
|
|
608,738 |
|
|
|
1,077,972 |
|
| |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Purchase of program rights and language versioning
|
|
|
(1,433,219 |
) |
|
|
(1,608,392 |
) |
|
|
(1,631,074 |
) |
| |
|
|
Increase in accounts receivable
|
|
|
(515,809 |
) |
|
|
(740,650 |
) |
|
|
(1,307,561 |
) |
| |
|
|
(Increase) decrease in retail inventories, net
|
|
|
(777,383 |
) |
|
|
252,870 |
|
|
|
(763,453 |
) |
| |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable
|
|
|
1,242,235 |
|
|
|
777,510 |
|
|
|
883,283 |
|
| |
|
|
Increase in accrued liabilities
|
|
|
169,642 |
|
|
|
425,674 |
|
|
|
263,015 |
|
| |
|
|
Increase in income taxes payable
|
|
|
939,964 |
|
|
|
369,587 |
|
|
|
674,288 |
|
| |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
457,341 |
|
|
|
210,947 |
|
|
|
(22,218 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,693,504 |
|
|
|
5,255,815 |
|
|
|
5,192,589 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1,378,218 |
) |
|
|
(1,299,228 |
) |
|
|
(3,886,668 |
) |
| |
Acquisition of subsidiary, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(188,844 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(391,887 |
) |
| |
Investments in affiliates
|
|
|
(626,050 |
) |
|
|
(1,259,945 |
) |
|
|
(748,500 |
) |
| |
Other, net
|
|
|
(113,998 |
) |
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,307,110 |
) |
|
|
(2,554,673 |
) |
|
|
(5,027,055 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Proceeds (repayments) on short-term debt
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
(46,000 |
) |
| |
Proceeds from advances from affiliate
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
938,000 |
|
| |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
4,040,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(176,000 |
) |
| |
Principal payments on obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
(527,935 |
) |
|
|
(460,262 |
) |
|
|
(429,014 |
) |
| |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
| |
Payments to acquire treasury stock
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6,000,000 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(467,935 |
) |
|
|
(374,262 |
) |
|
|
286,986 |
|
|
Net effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(25,895 |
) |
|
|
(23,095 |
) |
|
|
(4,677 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
892,564 |
|
|
|
2,303,785 |
|
|
|
447,843 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,708,419 |
|
|
|
2,600,983 |
|
|
|
4,904,768 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
¥ |
2,600,983 |
|
|
¥ |
4,904,768 |
|
|
¥ |
5,352,611 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Income taxes
|
|
¥ |
299,999 |
|
|
¥ |
1,702,678 |
|
|
¥ |
2,551,301 |
|
| |
|
Interest
|
|
|
152,381 |
|
|
|
126,277 |
|
|
|
90,711 |
|
| |
Acquisition of BBF (Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Fair value of assets acquired (including cash acquired of
¥158,113 thousand)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
705,657 |
|
| |
|
Fair value of liabilities assumed
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(87,657 |
) |
| |
|
Accrued estimated additional purchase consideration
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(68,000 |
) |
| |
Non-cash activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Assets acquired under capital leases
|
|
|
5,457 |
|
|
|
142,644 |
|
|
|
1,037,505 |
|
| |
|
Acquisition of LJS through issuance of treasury stock
(Note 2)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,200,990 |
|
| |
|
Elimination of long-term loan from LJS
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
840,000 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
IV-46
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
| (1) |
Description of Business and Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies and Practices |
|
|
| (a) |
Description of Business |
Jupiter Programming Co. Ltd. (the “Company”) and its
subsidiaries (hereafter collectively referred to as
“JPC”) invest in, develop, manage and distribute
television programming to cable and satellite systems in Japan.
Jupiter Shop Channel Co., Ltd (“Shop Channel”),
through which JPC markets and sells a wide variety of consumer
products and accessories, is JPC’s largest channel in terms
of revenue, comprising approximately 80%, 81%, and 83%, of total
revenues for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, respectively. JPC’s business activities are conducted
in Japan and serve the Japanese market.
The Company is owned 50% by Liberty Media International, Inc.
(“LMI”) through its wholly owned subsidiaries Liberty
Programming Japan, Inc. (43%) and Liberty Programming
Japan II LLC (7%), and 50% by Sumitomo Corporation. The
Company was incorporated in 1996 in Japan under the name
Kabushiki Kaisha Jupiter Programming, Jupiter Programming Co.
Ltd. in English.
|
|
| (b) |
Basis of Consolidated Financial Statements |
The consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’
equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the year
ended December 31, 2002, as well as the related footnote
disclosures for that year, are unaudited. These consolidated
financial statements for 2002 have been prepared on a consistent
basis with the 2003 and 2004 consolidated financial statements
and reflect all adjustments that in the opinion of management
are necessary to present the results of operations and cash
flows for 2002 in accordance with the accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Company and its subsidiaries maintain their books of account
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
Japan. The consolidated financial statements presented herein
have been prepared in a manner and reflect certain adjustments
that are necessary to conform them to accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The major
areas requiring such adjustment are accounting for derivative
instruments and hedging activities, accounting for assets held
under finance lease arrangements, accounting for goodwill and
other intangible assets, employers’ accounting for
pensions, accounting for compensated absence, accounting for
deferred taxes, accounting for cooperative marketing
arrangements and certain customer discounts, and accounting for
the non-cash contribution of Liberty J Sports, Inc., from LMI.
|
|
| (c) |
Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the financial
statements of the Company and all of its majority owned
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
JPC accounts for investments in variable interest entities in
accordance with the provisions of the Revised Interpretation of
the FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 46
“Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, issued
in December 2003. The Revised Interpretation of
FIN No. 46 provides guidance on how to identify a
variable interest entity (“VIE”), and determines when
the assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests, and results
of operations of a VIE must be included in a company’s
consolidated financial statements. A company that holds variable
interests in an entity is required to consolidate the entity if
the company’s interest in the VIE is such that the company
will absorb a majority of the VIE’s expected losses and/or
receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual
returns, if any. VIEs created after December 31, 2003 must
be accounted for under FIN No. 46R. For nonpublic
companies, FIN No. 46R must be applied to all VIEs created
before January 1, 2004 that are subject to this
Interpretation by the beginning of the first annual period
beginning after December 15, 2004. There has been no
material effect to JPC’s consolidated financial statements
from potential VIEs entered into after December 31, 2003
and there was no impact from the adoption of the deferred
provisions effective January 1, 2005.
IV-47
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid debt instruments with
an initial maturity of three months or less from the date of
purchase.
|
|
| (e) |
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
Allowance for doubtful accounts is computed based on historical
bad debt experience and includes estimated uncollectible amounts
based on an analysis of certain individual accounts, including
claims in bankruptcy.
Retail Inventories, consisting primarily of products held for
sale on Shop Channel, are stated at the lower of cost or market
value. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
|
|
| (g) |
Program Rights and Language Versioning |
Rights to programming acquired for broadcast on the programming
channels and language versioning are stated at the lower of cost
and net realizable value. Program right licenses generally state
a fixed time period within which a program can be aired, and
generally limit the number of times a program can be aired. The
licensor retains ownership of the program upon expiration of the
license. Programming rights and language versioning costs are
amortized over the license period for the program rights based
on the nature of the contract or program. Where airing runs are
limited, amortization is generally based on runs usage, where
usage is unlimited, a straight line basis is used as an estimate
of actual usage for amortization purposes. Certain sports
programs are amortized fully upon first airing. Such
amortization is included in programming and distribution expense
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
The portion of unamortized program rights and language
versioning costs expected to be amortized within one year is
classified as a current asset in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets.
For those investments in affiliates in which JPC’s voting
interest is 20% to 50% and JPC has the ability to exercise
significant influence over the affiliates’ operations and
financial policies, the equity method of accounting is used.
Under this method, the investment is originally recorded at cost
and is adjusted to recognize JPC’s share of the net
earnings or losses of its affiliates. JPC recognizes its share
of losses of an equity method affiliate until its investment and
net advances, if any, are reduced to zero and only provides for
additional losses in the event that it has guaranteed
obligations of the equity method affiliate or is otherwise
committed to provide further financial support.
The difference between the carrying value of JPC’s
investment in the affiliate and the underlying equity in the net
assets of the affiliate is recorded as equity method intangible
assets where appropriate and amortized over a relevant period of
time, or as residual goodwill. Equity method goodwill is not
amortized but continues to be reviewed for impairment in
accordance with APB No. 18, which requires that an other
than temporary decline in value of an investment be recognized
as an impairment loss.
Investments in other securities carried at cost represent
non-marketable equity securities in which JPC’s ownership
is less than 20% and JPC does not have the ability to exercise
significant influence over the entities’ operation and
financial policies.
JPC evaluates its investments in affiliates and non-marketable
equity securities for impairment due to declines in value
considered to be other than temporary. In performing its
evaluations, JPC utilizes various sources of information, as
available, including cash flow projections, independent
valuations and, as applicable, stock
IV-48
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
price analysis. In the event of a determination that a decline
in value is other than temporary, a charge to income is recorded
for the loss, and a new cost basis in the investment is
established.
|
|
| (i) |
Derivative Financial Instruments |
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended, entities
are required to carry all derivative instruments in the
consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for
changes in the fair value (that is, gains or losses) of a
derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated
and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, if so, on
the reason for holding the instrument. If certain conditions are
met, entities may elect to designate a derivative instrument as
a hedge of exposures to changes in fair values, cash flows, or
foreign currencies. If the hedged exposure is a fair value
exposure, the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is
recognized in earnings in the period of change together with the
offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the
risk being hedged. If the hedged exposure is a cash flow
exposure, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the
derivative instrument is reported initially as a component of
other comprehensive income (loss) and subsequently reclassified
into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings.
Any amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness
as well as the ineffective portion of the gain or loss are
reported in earnings immediately. If the derivative instrument
is not designated as a hedge, the gain or loss is recognized in
income in the period of change.
JPC uses foreign exchange forward contracts to manage currency
exposure, resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange
rates, on purchase commitments for contracted programming rights
and other contract costs and for forecasted inventory purchases
in U.S. dollars. JPC enters into these contracts to hedge
its U.S. dollar denominated net monetary exposures. Hedges
relating to purchase commitments for contracted programming
rights and other contract costs may qualify for hedge accounting
under the hedging criteria specified by SFAS No. 133.
However prior to January 1, 2004, JPC elected not to
designate any qualifying transactions as hedges. For certain
qualifying transactions entered into since January 1, 2004,
JPC has designated the transactions as cash flow hedges and the
effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative
instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive
loss. For JPC’s foreign exchange forward contracts that do
not qualify for hedge accounting under the hedging criteria
specified by SFAS No. 133, changes in the fair value
of derivatives are recorded in the consolidated statement of
operations in the period of the change.
JPC does not, as a matter of policy, enter into derivative
transactions for the purpose of speculation.
|
|
| (j) |
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation and amortization is generally computed using the
straight line method over the estimated useful lives of the
respective assets as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
2-20 years |
|
|
Leasehold and building improvements
|
|
|
3-18 years |
|
|
Equipment and vehicles
|
|
|
2-15 years |
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
37-50 years |
|
Equipment under capital leases is initially stated at the
present value of minimum lease payments. Equipment under capital
leases is amortized using the straight line method over the
shorter of the lease term and the estimated useful lives of the
respective assets, which generally range from three to nine
years.
IV-49
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
|
|
| (k) |
Software Development Costs |
JPC capitalizes certain costs incurred to purchase or develop
software for internal use. Costs incurred to develop software
for internal use are expensed as incurred during the preliminary
project stage, including costs associated with making strategic
decisions and determining performance and system requirements
regarding the project, and vendor demonstration costs. Labor
costs incurred subsequent to the preliminary project stage
through implementation are capitalized. JPC also expenses costs
incurred for internal use software projects in the post
implementation stage such as costs for training and maintenance.
The capitalized cost of software is amortized straight-line over
the estimated useful life, which is generally two to five years.
|
|
| (l) |
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Goodwill represents the excess of costs over fair value of net
assets of businesses acquired. In June 2001, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and
SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets.” SFAS No. 141 requires the use of the
purchase method of accounting for business combinations and
establishes certain criteria for the recognition of intangible
assets separately from goodwill. Under SFAS No. 142
goodwill is no longer amortized, but instead is tested for
impairment at least annually. Intangible assets with definite
useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated
useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with
SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” Any recognized intangible
assets determined to have an indefinite useful life are not
amortized, but instead are tested for impairment until their
life is determined to be no longer indefinite.
JPC performs its annual impairment test for goodwill and
indefinite-life intangible assets at the end of each year. JPC
completed its annual impairment tests at December 31, 2002,
2003 and 2004, respectively, with no indication of impairment
identified.
|
|
| (m) |
Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed
Of |
JPC accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 144. SFAS No. 144
requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable
intangibles with definite useful lives be reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net
undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.
If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to
be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying
amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Fair value is
determined by independent third party appraisals, projected
discounted cash flows, or other valuation techniques as
appropriate.
In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143,
“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” The
standard requires that obligations associated with the
retirement of tangible long-lived assets be recorded as
liabilities when those obligations are incurred, with the amount
of the liability initially measured at fair value. The
associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the
carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2002. JPC adopted
SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003 and the adoption
did not have a material effect on its results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.
|
|
| (n) |
Accrued Pension and Severance Costs |
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries provide a Retirement
Allowance Plan (“RAP”) for eligible employees. The RAP
is an unfunded retirement allowance program in which benefits
are based on years of service which in turn determine a multiple
of final monthly compensation. JPC accounts for the RAP in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 87,
“Employers’ Accounting for Pensions”.
IV-50
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In addition, JPC employees participate in an Employees’
Pension Fund (“EPF”) Plan. The EPF Plan is a
multi-employer plan consisting of approximately 120
participating companies, mainly affiliates of Sumitomo
Corporation. The plan is composed of substitutional portions
based on the pay-related part of the old age pension benefits
prescribed by the Welfare Pension Insurance Law in Japan, and
corporate portions based on contributory defined benefit pension
arrangements established at the discretion of the Company and
its subsidiaries. Benefits under the EPF Plan are based on years
of service and the employee’s compensation during the five
years before retirement.
The assets of the EPF Plan are co-mingled and no assets are
separately identifiable for any one participating company. JPC
accounts for the EPF Plan in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 87, governing multi-employer plans. Under
these provisions, JPC recognizes a net pension expense for the
required contribution for each period and recognizes a liability
for any contributions due but unpaid at the end of each period.
Any shortfalls in plan funding are charged to participating
companies on a ‘share-of-contribution’ basis through
’special contributions’ spread over a period of years
determined by the EPF Plan as being appropriate.
Retail sales. Revenue from sales of products by Shop
Channel is recognized when the products are delivered to
customers, which is when title and risk of loss transfers. Shop
Channel’s retail sales policy allows merchandise to be
returned at the customers’ discretion, generally up to
30 days after the date of sale. Retail sales revenue is
reported net of discounts, and of estimated returns, which are
based upon historical experience.
Television Programming Revenue. Television programming
revenue includes subscription and advertising revenue.
Subscription revenue is recognized in the periods in which
programming services are provided to cable and satellite
subscribers. JPC’s channels distribute programming to
individual satellite platform subscribers through an agreement
with the platform operator which provides subscriber management
services to channels in return for a fee based on subscription
revenues. Individual subscribers pay a monthly fee for
programming channels under the terms of rolling one-month
subscription contracts. Cable service providers generally pay a
per-subscriber fee for the right to distribute JPC’s
programming on their systems under the terms of generally annual
distribution contracts. Subscription revenue is recognized net
of satellite platform commissions and certain cooperative
marketing and advertising funds paid to cable system operators.
Satellite platform commissions for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were ¥843,335
thousand, ¥1,580,945 thousand and ¥1,639,055 thousand,
respectively. Cooperative marketing and advertising funds paid
to cable system operators for the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 were ¥80,289 thousand, ¥174,432
thousand and ¥225,572 thousand, respectively.
The Company generates advertising revenue on all of its
programming channels except Shop Channel. Advertising revenue is
recognized, net of agency commissions, when advertisements are
broadcast on JPC’s programming channels.
Services and Other Revenue. Services and other revenue
mainly comprises cable and advertising sales fees and
commissions, and technical broadcast facility and production
services provided by the Company and certain subsidiaries, and
is recognized in the periods in which such services are provided
to customers.
Cost of retail sales consists of the cost of products marketed
to customers by Shop Channel, including write-downs for
inventory obsolescence, shipping and handling costs and
warehouse costs. Product costs are recognized as cost of retail
sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations
when the products are delivered to customers and the
corresponding revenue is recognized.
IV-51
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
|
|
| (q) |
Cost of Programming and Distribution |
Cost of programming and distribution consists of costs incurred
to acquire or produce programs airing on the channels
distributed to cable and satellite subscribers. Distribution
costs include the costs of delivering the programming channels
via satellite, including the costs incurred for uplink services
and use of satellite transponders, and payments made to cable
and satellite platforms for carriage of Shop Channel.
Advertising expense is recognized as incurred and is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses or, if appropriate,
as a reduction of subscription revenue. Cooperative marketing
costs are recognized as an expense to the extent that an
identifiable benefit is received and the fair value of the
benefit can be reasonably measured, otherwise as a reduction of
subscription revenue. Advertising expense included in selling,
general and administrative expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 was ¥1,062,757
thousand, ¥1,003,836 thousand and ¥1,333,596 thousand,
respectively.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss
and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
|
|
| (t) |
Foreign Currency Transactions |
Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are
translated at the applicable current rates on the balance sheet
dates. All revenue and expenses denominated in foreign
currencies are converted at the rates of exchange prevailing
when such transactions occur. The resulting exchange gains or
losses are reflected in other income (expense) in the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Management of JPC has made a number of estimates and assumptions
relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period, to prepare
these consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Significant items subject to such estimates and
assumptions include valuation allowances for accounts
receivable, retail inventories, investments, deferred tax
assets, retail sales returns, and obligations related to
employees’ retirement plans. Actual results could differ
from estimates.
|
|
| (v) |
New Accounting Standards |
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
“Inventory Costs-an amendment of ARB No. 43.”
This Statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the
accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage).
Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4, previously stated
that “... under some circumstances, items such as idle
facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight, and
rehandling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment as
current period charges... .” This Statement requires that
those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless
of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.”
In addition, this Statement requires
IV-52
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of
conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. This statement is effective for inventory costs
incurred during annual periods beginning after June 15,
2005. JPC does not expect the adoption of this statement will
have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for
comparability with the current year presentation.
On May 1, 2002, JPC acquired 100% of the outstanding common
stock of Misawa Satellite Broadcasting Ltd. (“MSB”), a
television programming company. The aggregate purchase price was
¥188,844 thousand and was paid in cash. The acquisition was
accounted for as a purchase. On January 1, 2003, JPC merged
the business operations of MSB with its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Jupiter Satellite Broadcasting Co., Ltd. MSB operated Home
Channel and as a result of the acquisition, JPC is expected to
increase direct-to-home revenue from the packages in which Home
Channel was carried. The results of operations of MSB are
included in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations from May 1, 2002 onward. Goodwill from the
acquisition of MSB is not deductible for tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
acquisition of MSB (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
¥ |
139,787 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
183,655 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
323,442 |
|
|
Current liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(134,598 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
¥ |
188,844 |
|
| |
|
|
|
In addition to the goodwill recognized from the MSB transaction,
¥7,827 thousand of other goodwill was recorded in 2002.
In April 2004, JPC acquired all of the issued and outstanding
common stock of Liberty J Sports, Inc. (“LJS”)
from LMI, in exchange for 24,000 shares of JPC’s
common stock held in treasury having a fair value, as determined
by independent appraisal, of ¥250,000 per share. The
aggregate purchase price amounted to
¥6,000,000 thousand. Immediately prior to the
acquisition, LJS held 33.3% of the issued and outstanding shares
of voting common stock of Jupiter Sports, Inc., with JPC holding
the remaining 66.7%. Jupiter Sports Inc. is a holding company
with its only principal asset, an investment, representing
approximately 42.8% of the issued and outstanding voting common
stock, in JSports Broadcasting Corporation (“JSB”).
JSB is a sports channel broadcasting company currently operating
three channels of various sports related contents. Jupiter
Sports Inc. accounts for its investment in JSB using the equity
method of accounting as it is able to exercise significant
influence over the operations of JSB. As a result of the
acquisition of LJS, JPC has increased its indirect ownership in
JSB from 28.5% to 42.8%. Upon consummation of the acquisition,
LJS was converted to a limited liability company with the
Certificate of Conversion filed with the Secretary of State of
Delaware, and renamed J Sports LLC.
The acquisition was consummated in concert with a series of
capital transactions as described in Note 15 to the
consolidated financial statements.
The Company has accounted for the acquisition to the extent of
the ¥3,000,000 thousand cash paid to LMI in an earlier
redemption of shares of common stock (see Note 15) in a
manner similar to a partial step acquisition, reflecting the
culmination of an earnings process on the part of LMI.
Accordingly, the excess of
IV-53
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
¥3,000,000 thousand over 50% of the fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed with respect to the
underlying investment in JSB has been recorded as a component of
JPC’s investment in JSB and accordingly has been classified
as equity method goodwill. Management has determined that the
fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
approximated their respective carrying values at the date of
acquisition, and that there were no material intangible assets
applicable to the underlying investment in JSB. The balance of
the underlying investment acquired in JSB has been accounted for
at historical cost using carryover basis with the difference of
¥3,000,000 thousand over such historical cost amount
being reflected as a deduction from additional paid in capital.
Goodwill from the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the allocation of the acquisition
consideration (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
50% of acquisition consideration
|
|
¥ |
3,000,000 |
|
| |
Fair value of 50% of underlying net assets acquired
|
|
|
200,990 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Equity method goodwill
|
|
¥ |
2,799,010 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Carryover basis:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
50% of acquisition consideration
|
|
¥ |
3,000,000 |
|
| |
Historical cost of 50% of underlying net assets acquired
|
|
|
200,990 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Carryover basis adjustment to additional paid in capital
|
|
¥ |
2,799,010 |
|
| |
|
|
|
On December 28, 2004, JPC acquired 100% of the outstanding
shares of BB Factory Corporation Ltd. (“BBF”), a
television programming company. The aggregate purchase price is
estimated to be ¥618,000 thousand, of which
¥550,000 thousand was paid in cash on December 28,
2004. The estimated additional purchase consideration of
¥68,000 has been accrued at December 31, 2004. The
amount was determined with reference to the net asset value of
BBF at January 31, 2005, pending final approval by both
parties to the transaction. The additional purchase amount for
BBF shall be settled in cash no later than March 31, 2005.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. JPC intends to
sell access rights to the BBF broadcasting infrastructure to a
new joint venture in which the JPC will hold a 50% interest. The
new joint venture will be named Reality TV Japan, and was
incorporated on January 26, 2005. BBF operated Channel BB
and as a result of the acquisition, JPC expects to decrease
funding requirements for Reality TV Japan due to its access to
direct-to-home revenue from the packages in which Channel BB was
carried. JPC has recognized intangible assets in the amount of
¥200,000 thousand representing estimated financial
benefits from taking over Channel BB’s position in those
packaging alliances, which it will amortize over a ten year
period from 2005. The results of operations of BBF will be
included in JPC’s consolidated statements of operations
from January 1, 2005. Goodwill from the acquisition of BBF
is not deductible for tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of
acquisition of BBF (Yen in thousands).
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
¥ |
224,471 |
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
281,186 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
705,657 |
|
|
Current liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(6,277 |
) |
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(81,380 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
¥ |
618,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
IV-54
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
|
|
| (3) |
Program Rights and Language Versioning |
Program rights and language versioning as of December 31,
2003 and 2004 were composed of the following (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Program rights
|
|
¥ |
1,616,603 |
|
|
¥ |
1,308,623 |
|
|
Language versioning
|
|
|
206,884 |
|
|
|
116,910 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
1,823,487 |
|
|
|
1,425,533 |
|
|
Less accumulated amortization 557,638
|
|
|
(1,036,357 |
) |
|
|
(739,764 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
787,130 |
|
|
|
685,769 |
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(646,758 |
) |
|
|
(599,480 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
140,372 |
|
|
¥ |
86,289 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to program rights and language
versioning for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004 was ¥1,298,054 thousand,
¥1,570,670 thousand and ¥1,732,435 thousand,
respectively, which is included in cost of programming and
distribution in the consolidated statements of operations in
respective years.
Investments, including advances, as of December 31, 2003
and 2004 were composed of the following (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
percentage | |
|
carrying | |
|
percentage | |
|
carrying | |
| |
|
ownership | |
|
amount | |
|
ownership | |
|
amount | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Investments accounted for under the equity method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Discovery Japan, Inc.
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
¥ |
281,692 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
¥ |
580,455 |
|
| |
Animal Planet Japan, Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
342,423 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
223,510 |
|
| |
InteracTV Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
42.5 |
% |
|
|
38,805 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
% |
|
|
38,586 |
|
| |
JSports Broadcasting Corporation
|
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
1,110,431 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
% |
|
|
4,045,414 |
|
| |
AXN Japan, Inc.
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
825,112 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
879,630 |
|
| |
Jupiter VOD Co., Inc.
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
401,266 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity method investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,598,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,168,861 |
|
|
Investments accounted for at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NikkeiCNBC Japan, Inc.
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
100,000 |
|
| |
Kids Station, Inc.
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
304,500 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
304,500 |
|
| |
AT-X, Inc.
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
266,000 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
266,000 |
|
| |
Nihon Eiga Satellite Broadcasting Corporation
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
66,600 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
66,600 |
|
| |
Satellite Service Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
24,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost method investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,100 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
3,359,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
¥ |
6,929,961 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-55
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The following investments represent participation in programming
businesses:
|
|
| |
Discovery Japan, Inc., a general documentary channel; |
| |
Animal Planet Japan, Co. Ltd., an animal-specific documentary
channel; |
| |
JSports Broadcasting Corporation, a sports channel business
currently operating three channels; |
| |
AXN Japan, Inc., an action and adventure channel; |
| |
NikkeiCNBC Japan, Inc., a news service channel; |
| |
Kids Station, Inc., a children’s entertainment channel; |
| |
AT-X, Inc., an animation genre channel; |
| |
Nihon Eiga Satellite Broadcasting Corporation, a Japanese period
drama and movie channels business |
| |
currently operating two channels; and |
| |
Jupiter VOD Co., Inc. a multi-genre video on demand programming
service |
The following investments represent participation in broadcast
license-holding companies through which channels are consigned
to subscribers to the “CS110 degree East’
Direct-to-home satellite service:
|
|
| |
InteracTV Co., Ltd., holds licenses for Movie Plus, Lala, Golf
Network and Shop channels, among |
| |
others; |
| |
Satellite Service Co. Ltd., holds licenses for Discovery and
Animal Planet channels, among others. |
The following reflects JPC’s share of earnings (losses) of
investments accounted for under the equity method for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
Discovery Japan, Inc.
|
|
¥ |
(92,949 |
) |
|
¥ |
143,445 |
|
|
¥ |
298,763 |
|
|
Animal Planet Japan, Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
(260,929 |
) |
|
|
(311,673 |
) |
|
|
(283,913 |
) |
|
InteracTV Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
(1,142 |
) |
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
JSports Broadcasting Corporation
|
|
|
191,262 |
|
|
|
143,227 |
|
|
|
135,973 |
|
|
AXN Japan, Inc.
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(38,199 |
) |
|
|
(43,982 |
) |
|
Jupiter VOD Co., Inc.
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(83,734 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
(163,758 |
) |
|
¥ |
(64,472 |
) |
|
¥ |
22,888 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2003, the Company invested ¥863,311 thousand to
acquire a 35% interest in AXN Japan, Inc. (“AXN”).
During 2004 JPC provided cash loans in the amount of
¥98,500 thousand to AXN. AXN is an action and adventure
entertainment channel that complements JPC’s channel
businesses.
In December 2004, the Company invested ¥485,000 thousand
and acquired a 50% voting interest in Jupiter VOD Co., Ltd.
(“JVOD”). JVOD is a video on demand service that will
begin providing on-demand video services primarily to digitized
cable systems capable of receiving its service from January 2005.
The carrying amount of investments in affiliates as of
December 31, 2003, included ¥751,940 thousand of
excess cost of the investments over the Company’s equity in
the net assets of AXN. The carrying amount of investments in
affiliates as of December 31, 2004, included ¥751,940
thousand and ¥2,799,010 thousand of excess cost of the
investments over the Company’s equity in the net assets of
AXN and JSB, respectively. The amount of that excess cost
represents “equity method goodwill.”
JPC holds 33.3% of the ordinary shares of Animal Planet Japan,
Co. Ltd, and records its share of the earnings and losses in
accordance with that ordinary shareholding ratio. The Company
has funding obligations in accordance with its ordinary
shareholding ratio up to a maximum of ¥1,295,250 thousand.
During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, the
Company invested ¥370,000 thousand and ¥165,000
thousand, respectively, and had made an aggregate investment of
¥1,295,000 thousand as of December 31, 2004, in
IV-56
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Animal Planet Japan, Co. Ltd. JPC’s funding obligations for
this investment have been substantially fulfilled. JPC and
Animal Planet Japan, Co. Ltd.’s other shareholders are
currently preparing a revised business plan and funding
agreement for this investment.
The aggregate cost of JPC’s cost method investments totaled
¥761,100 thousand at December 31, 2004. JPC estimated
that the fair value of each of those investments exceeded the
cost of the investment, and therefore concluded that no
impairment had occurred.
Financial information for the companies in which the Company has
an investment accounted for under the equity method is presented
as combined as the companies are similar in nature and operate
in the same business area. Condensed combined financial
information is as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Combined financial position at December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current assets
|
|
¥ |
6,747,882 |
|
|
¥ |
8,533,233 |
|
| |
Other assets
|
|
|
1,780,915 |
|
|
|
634,175 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total assets
|
|
¥ |
8,528,797 |
|
|
¥ |
9,167,408 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Current liabilities
|
|
¥ |
2,983,359 |
|
|
¥ |
3,056,756 |
|
| |
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,543,293 |
|
|
|
1,413,948 |
|
| |
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
3,002,145 |
|
|
|
4,696,704 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
¥ |
8,528,797 |
|
|
¥ |
9,167,408 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
Combined operations for the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
¥ |
16,034,608 |
|
|
¥ |
15,256,112 |
|
|
¥ |
21,682,192 |
|
| |
Operating expenses
|
|
|
15,720,997 |
|
|
|
15,270,229 |
|
|
|
21,998,685 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
313,611 |
|
|
|
(14,117 |
) |
|
|
(316,493 |
) |
| |
Other income, net, including income taxes
|
|
|
364,935 |
|
|
|
319,099 |
|
|
|
783,921 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net income
|
|
¥ |
678,546 |
|
|
¥ |
304,982 |
|
|
¥ |
467,428 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IV-57
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
|
|
| (5) |
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment as of December 31, 2003 and 2004
were comprised of the following (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
¥ |
143,364 |
|
|
¥ |
187,233 |
|
|
Leasehold and building improvements
|
|
|
671,028 |
|
|
|
1,362,537 |
|
|
Equipment and vehicles
|
|
|
2,698,152 |
|
|
|
4,295,113 |
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
851,485 |
|
|
Land
|
|
|
437,147 |
|
|
|
437,147 |
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
253,678 |
|
|
|
183,254 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
4,203,369 |
|
|
|
7,316,769 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,191,083 |
) |
|
|
(1,989,701 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
2,012,286 |
|
|
¥ |
5,327,068 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment include assets held under capitalized
lease arrangements (Note 11). Depreciation and amortization
expense related to property and equipment for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 was ¥699,332
thousand, ¥734,930 thousand and ¥772,907 thousand,
respectively.
|
|
| (6) |
Software Development Costs |
Capitalized software development costs for internal use as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (Yen in
thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Software development costs
|
|
¥ |
2,722,942 |
|
|
¥ |
3,773,137 |
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,272,554 |
) |
|
|
(1,870,893 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
1,450,388 |
|
|
¥ |
1,902,244 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant software development additions during 2003 and 2004
included development of Shop Channel core system and e-commerce
infrastructure, and further development of a sales receivables
management system, all of which are for internal use.
Aggregate amortization expense for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 was ¥355,727
thousand, ¥451,327 thousand and ¥584,340 thousand,
respectively.
Intangible assets acquired during the year ended
December 31, 2004 totaled ¥214,936 thousand. The
weighted average amortization period is ten years. (Note 2)
IV-58
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The details of intangible assets other than software and
goodwill at December 31, 2003 and 2004 were as follows (Yen
in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Intangible assets subject to amortization, net of accumulated
amortization of ¥6,420 thousand in 2003 and ¥28,417
thousand in 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Channel packaging arrangements
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
200,000 |
|
| |
Other
|
|
|
54,525 |
|
|
|
46,886 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
54,525 |
|
|
|
246,886 |
|
|
Other intangible assets not subject to amortization:
|
|
|
4,868 |
|
|
|
5,073 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets
|
|
¥ |
59,393 |
|
|
¥ |
251,959 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Channel packaging arrangements represent estimated value to be
derived from existing channel position in packaging alliances on
the direct-to-home satellite distribution platform, and are
being amortized over their estimated useful life of ten years.
The aggregate amortization expense of other intangible assets
subject to amortization for the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004 was ¥36,177 thousand, ¥1,802
thousand and ¥22,257 thousand, respectively. The future
estimated amortization expenses for each of five years relating
to amounts currently recorded in the consolidated balance sheet
are as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
¥ |
45,892 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
26,146 |
|
|
2007
|
|
|
22,466 |
|
|
2008
|
|
|
22,466 |
|
|
2009
|
|
|
22,466 |
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were as follows (Yen
in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
|
¥ |
191,482 |
|
|
¥ |
188,945 |
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
191,482 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
281,186 |
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,537 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
¥ |
191,482 |
|
|
¥ |
188,945 |
|
|
¥ |
470,131 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A breakdown of the goodwill recorded during 2002 and 2004 is
provided in note 2 and is summarized as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
Misawa Satellite Broadcasting Co |
|
¥191,482 thousand |
|
2004
|
|
BB Factory |
|
¥281,186 thousand |
|
|
| (9) |
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
JPC uses foreign exchange forward contracts that extend 3 to
52 months to manage currency exposure, resulting from
changes in foreign currency exchange rates, on purchase
commitments for contracted programming rights and other contract
costs and for forecasted inventory purchases in
U.S. dollars. JPC enters into these contracts to hedge its
U.S. dollar denominated monetary exposures.
IV-59
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
JPC does not enter into derivative financial transactions for
trading or speculative purposes.
JPC is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of
non-performance by the counterparties to derivative financial
instruments, but they do not expect the counterparties to fail
to meet their obligations because of the high credit rating of
the counterparties.
For certain qualifying transactions entered into from
January 1, 2004, JPC designates the transactions as cash
flow hedges and the effective portion of the gain or loss on the
derivative instrument is reported as a component of other
accumulated comprehensive loss. The amount of hedge
ineffectiveness recognized currently in foreign exchange gain
was not material for the year ended December 31, 2004.
These amounts are reclassified into earnings through loss
(gain) on forward exchange contracts when the hedged items
impact earnings. Accumulated losses, net of taxes, of
¥16,705 thousand are included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss at December 31, 2004, and will be
reclassified into earnings within twelve months. No cash flow
hedges were discontinued during the year ended December 31,
2004 as a result of forecasted transactions that are no longer
probable to occur.
JPC has entered into foreign exchange forward contracts
designated but not qualified as hedging instruments under
SFAS No. 133 as a means of hedging certain foreign
currency exposures. JPC records these contracts on the balance
sheet at fair value. The changes in fair value of such
instruments are recognized currently in earnings and are
included in foreign exchange (loss) gain.
At December 31, 2003, the fair value of forward exchange
contracts not designated as hedging instruments recognized in
the balance sheet was a liability of
¥241,507 thousand. At December 31, 2004, the fair
value of forward exchange contracts recognized in the balance
sheet was a liability of ¥174,959 thousand and an asset of
¥18,813 thousand.
|
|
| (10) |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The carrying amounts for financial instruments in JPC’s
consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2003 and
2004 approximate to their estimated fair values. Fair value
estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant
market information and information about the financial
instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and,
therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in
assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the
fair value of each class of financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, income taxes payable, accrued liabilities, and other
current liabilities (non-derivatives): The carrying amounts
approximate fair value because of the short duration of these
instruments.
Foreign exchange forward contracts: The carrying amount
is reflective of fair value. The fair value of currency forward
contracts is estimated based on quotes obtained from financial
institutions. As at December 31, 2003, fair value of
foreign exchange forward contracts of
¥241,507 thousand was included in the consolidated
balance sheet under other current liabilities. As at
December 31, 2004, fair value of foreign exchange forward
contracts of ¥18,813 thousand was included in the
consolidated balance sheet under other current assets, and
¥174,959 thousand was included under other current
liabilities.
Long-term debt, including current maturities and short-term
debt: The fair value of JPC’s long-term debt is
estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each
instrument by a proxy for rates expected to be incurred on
similar borrowings at current rates. Borrowings bear interest
based on certain financial ratios that determine a margin over
Euroyen TIBOR, and are therefore variable. JPC believes the
carrying amount approximates fair value based on the variable
rates and currently available terms and conditions for similar
debt.
IV-60
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Capital lease obligations, including current
installments: The carrying amount is reflective of fair
value. The fair value of JPC’s capital lease obligations is
estimated by discounting the future cash flows of each
instrument at rates currently offered to JPC by leasing
companies.
JPC is obligated under various capital leases for certain
equipment and other assets that expire at various dates,
generally during the next five years. At December 31, 2003
and 2004, the gross amount of equipment and the related
accumulated amortization recorded under capital leases were as
follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Equipment and vehicles
|
|
¥ |
1,794,097 |
|
|
¥ |
1,839,215 |
|
|
Others
|
|
|
99,667 |
|
|
|
126,368 |
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(1,417,805 |
) |
|
|
(865,908 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
475,959 |
|
|
¥ |
1,099,675 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of assets held under capital leases is included
with depreciation and amortization expense. Leased equipment is
included in property and equipment (note 5).
Future minimum capital lease payments as of December 31,
2004 were as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
¥ |
313,917 |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
247,663 |
|
| |
2007
|
|
|
224,818 |
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
190,961 |
|
| |
2009
|
|
|
170,756 |
|
| |
Thereafter
|
|
|
24,479 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
1,172,594 |
|
|
Less amount representing interest (at rates ranging from 1.25%
to 2.6%)
|
|
|
(59,393 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Present value of future minimum capital lease payments
|
|
|
1,113,201 |
|
|
Less current installments
|
|
|
(290,031 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
823,170 |
|
| |
|
|
|
JPC also has several operating leases, primarily for office
space, that expire over the next 10 years and a 30-year
lease for land that expires in 29 years. Rent expense for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 was
¥238,621 thousand, ¥275,264 thousand and
¥332,530 thousand, respectively.
The Company leases two principle office premises. JPC
headquarters has a three-year lease agreement from August 2004,
with a rolling two-year right of renewal that provides for
annual rental costs of ¥245,118 thousand. Shop Channel
has a 10-year agreement expiring in October 2013 with an annual
rental cost of ¥185,905 thousand. These and other
leases for office space are mainly cancelable upon six months
notice. Accordingly, the schedule below detailing future minimum
lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases includes
the lease costs for the Company’s premises for only a
six-month period.
IV-61
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
Future minimum lease payments for the noncancelable portion of
operating leases as of December 31, 2004 were as follows
(Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
¥ |
293,418 |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
4,980 |
|
| |
2007
|
|
|
4,980 |
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
4,980 |
|
| |
2009
|
|
|
4,980 |
|
| |
Thereafter
|
|
|
111,635 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
¥ |
424,973 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Short-term debt at December 31, 2003 and 2004 consisted of
the following (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Promissory note
|
|
¥ |
46,000 |
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt in 2003 represented a promissory note in the
amount of ¥46,000 thousand due to Sony Pictures
Entertainment (Japan) Inc. which was repaid by the due date of
March 31, 2004.
Long-term debt at December 31, 2003 and 2004 consisted of
the following (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Borrowings from banks
|
|
¥ |
4,000,000 |
|
|
¥ |
4,000,000 |
|
|
Loans from shareholders
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
Loans from subsidiary minority shareholders
|
|
|
1,016,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
6,016,000 |
|
|
|
5,000,000 |
|
|
Less: current maturities
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
¥ |
6,016,000 |
|
|
¥ |
5,000,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, the Company had a
¥10,000,000 thousand credit facility (the
“Facility”) available for immediate and full borrowing
with a group of banks. The Facility, which is guaranteed by
certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, comprises an
¥8,000,000 thousand five-year term loan and a
¥2,000,000 thousand 364-day revolving facility.
Outstanding borrowings under the five-year term loan at
December 31, 2003 and 2004 were
¥4,000,000 thousand. There were no borrowings
outstanding under the 364-day revolving facility as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004. The Company pays a commitment
fee of 0.20% on undrawn borrowings of the Facility. Interest on
outstanding borrowings is based on certain financial ratios and
can range from Euroyen TIBOR + 0.75% to TIBOR + 2.00% for the
five-year term loan and from TIBOR + 0.70% to TIBOR + 1.00% for
the 364-day revolving facility. The interest rates charged at
December 31, 2003 and 2004 for the five-year term loan and
for the 364-day revolving facility were 0.83% and 0.835% and
0.78% and 0.785%, respectively.
The term loan portion of the Facility is available for immediate
and full borrowing to be drawn upon until December 25,
2005. Repayment by installments begins on March 31, 2006,
on a quarterly basis, equal to 10% of the outstanding balance at
the end of the availability period, until fully repaid on
June 25, 2008. The 364-day revolving facility was renewed
on June 22, 2004 and is available for immediate and full
borrowing until June 22, 2005, and repayment in full is due
on that date.
IV-62
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The Facility contains certain financial and other restrictive
covenants. The financial covenants consist of: (i) EBITDA,
as defined by the Facility agreement and reported on a
Commercial Code of Japan basis, shall be equal to or exceed; for
year 2004, ¥3,000,000 thousand; for year 2005,
¥3,500,000 thousand; for year 2006, ¥4,000,000
thousand; for year 2007, ¥5,000,000 thousand; and
(ii) ‘Actual Amount of Investment’, as defined by
the Facility agreement, shall not exceed ‘Maximum Amount of
Investment’ as defined, provided that, in respect of a
year, an amount equal to the excess of Maximum over Actual
amount of investment shall be added to the Maximum Amount of
Investment of the next following year. Maximum amounts of
investment are defined relative to prior year EBITDA and other
specified amounts.
Restrictive covenants contained in the Facility agreement
include certain restrictions on: (i) creation of
contractual security interests over the Company’s assets;
(ii) sale of assets that would result in material adverse
effect, or would comprise over 10% of total assets;
(iii) corporate reorganization that would result in
material adverse effect; (iv) sale of shares in principal
subsidiaries; (v) distribution of dividends, repurchase of
own shares, and repayment of subordinated loans;
(vi) amendment of subordinated loan agreements;
(vii) transactions with related parties other than in
normal course of business, (viii) changes in fundamental
nature of business; (ix) incursion of interest-bearing debt
not contemplated in the Facility agreement; (x) transfer,
creation of security interests on, or otherwise disposal of the
Company’s shares; (xi) changes in control of the
Company management by parent companies; (xii) purchase of
shares in companies in unrelated business areas; and
(xiii) changes in scope of the business of a particular
subsidiary. JPC was in compliance with these covenants at
December 31, 2004.
JPC has outstanding term borrowings of ¥500,000 thousand
from each of LMI and Sumitomo Corporation. The borrowings are
subordinated to the Facility described above. The borrowings
bear interest at the higher of the rate applicable to the term
loan portion of the Facility, and Japan Long Term Prime rate
(1.85% and 1.55% at December 31, 2003 and 2004,
respectively), and are due in full on July 26, 2008.
JPC had the following debt of certain subsidiaries due to
minority shareholders in those subsidiaries:
As of December 31, 2003 JPC had outstanding borrowings of
¥836,000 thousand by Jupiter Sports Inc. due to Liberty J
Sports, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of LMI. The
borrowings bore interest at the higher of the rate applicable to
the term loan portion of the Facility and Japan Long Term Prime
rate (1.85% at December 31, 2003), and was due in full on
December 31, 2007. In April 2004, JPC acquired all of the
issued and outstanding shares of Liberty J Sports, Inc. from
LMI. Upon acquiring control, the outstanding borrowings were
eliminated in consolidation of Liberty J Sports, Inc., which was
subsequently renamed J Sports LLC. Note 2 provides further
details of this acquisition.
As of December 31, 2003 JPC had outstanding borrowings of
¥180,000 thousand by Jupiter Shop Channel Co., Ltd. due to
Home Shopping Network Inc. The borrowings bore interest at the
Japan Short Term Prime rate (1.375% at December 31, 2003).
The borrowings were due in full on December 31, 2005 and
were repaid early in full in December 2004. No gain or loss was
recognized on this repayment transaction.
IV-63
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
The aggregate maturities of long-term debt for each of the five
years subsequent to December 31, 2004 were as follows (Yen
in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
¥ |
— |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
| |
2007
|
|
|
1,600,000 |
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
| |
2009
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
¥ |
5,000,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
The components of the provision for income taxes for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 recognized in the
consolidated statements of operations were as follows (Yen in
thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
Current taxes
|
|
¥ |
1,239,964 |
|
|
¥ |
2,072,264 |
|
|
¥ |
3,229,627 |
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(536,017 |
) |
|
|
(553,039 |
) |
|
|
(278,181 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
¥ |
703,947 |
|
|
¥ |
1,519,225 |
|
|
¥ |
2,951,446 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All pre-tax income and income tax expense is related to
operations in Japan. The tax effects of temporary differences
that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax
assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2003
and 2004 were presented below (Yen in thousands).
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Retail inventories
|
|
¥ |
617,970 |
|
|
¥ |
811,289 |
|
| |
Property and equipment
|
|
|
195,223 |
|
|
|
297,238 |
|
| |
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
372,529 |
|
|
|
330,995 |
|
| |
Enterprise tax payable
|
|
|
142,709 |
|
|
|
195,588 |
|
| |
Unrealized foreign exchange
|
|
|
101,371 |
|
|
|
62,581 |
|
| |
Equity method investments
|
|
|
711,645 |
|
|
|
944,389 |
|
| |
Operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
1,892,339 |
|
|
|
895,097 |
|
| |
Others
|
|
|
270,394 |
|
|
|
320,361 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
4,304,180 |
|
|
|
3,857,538 |
|
| |
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,901,655 |
) |
|
|
(2,165,372 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
1,402,525 |
|
|
|
1,692,166 |
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Intangibles
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(81,380 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
¥ |
1,402,525 |
|
|
¥ |
1,610,786 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net changes in the total valuation allowance for the years
ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 were decreases of
¥1,003,452 thousand, ¥1,970,667 thousand, and
¥736,283 thousand, respectively.
IV-64
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the
Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent
upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods
in which those temporary differences become deductible or in
which the operating losses are available for use. The Company
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities,
projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in
making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical
taxable income and projections for future taxable income over
the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible,
management believes it is more likely than not that the Company
will realize the benefit of these deductible differences, net of
the existing valuation allowance. The amount of the deferred tax
asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the
near term if estimates of the future taxable income during the
carryforward period are reduced.
At December 31, 2004, JPC and its subsidiaries had total
net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of
approximately ¥2,199,795 thousand, which are available to
offset future taxable income, if any. JPC’s subsidiaries
are subject to taxation on a stand-alone basis and net operating
loss carryforwards may not be utilized against other group
company profits. Aggregated net operating loss carryforwards, if
not utilized, expire as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
¥ |
1,116,701 |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
143,308 |
|
| |
2007
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
— |
|
| |
2009
|
|
|
351,540 |
|
| |
2010
|
|
|
229,485 |
|
| |
2011
|
|
|
358,761 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
¥ |
2,199,795 |
|
| |
|
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries were subject to Japanese
National Corporate tax of 30%, an Inhabitant tax of 6% and a
deductible Enterprise tax of 10%, which in aggregate result in a
statutory tax rate of 42.1%. On March 24, 2003, the
Japanese Diet approved the Amendments to Local Tax Law, reducing
the standard enterprise tax rate from 10.08% to 7.2%. The
amendments to the tax rates became effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after April 1, 2004. Consequently, the
statutory income tax rate was lowered to approximately 40.7% for
deferred tax assets and liabilities expected to be settled or
realized on or after January 1, 2005. As a result of the
decrease in the statutory tax rate, when compared with the
amounts based on the tax rate applied before this revision, the
net deferred tax assets decreased by approximately ¥47,119
thousand at December 31, 2004. A reconciliation of the
Japanese statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax
rate as a
IV-65
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
percentage of income before income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 is as follows:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory tax rate
|
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
|
42.1 |
% |
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(27.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
Income tax credits
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
Reduction of tax net operating loss due to intercompany transfer
of assets
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Additional tax deduction due to intercompany transfer of assets
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
Effect of tax rate change
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
Others
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
31.7 |
% |
|
|
40.8 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (14) |
Accrued Pension and Severance Cost |
Net periodic cost of the Company and its subsidiaries’
unfunded RAP accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 87 for the years ended December 31,
2002, 2003 and 2004, included the following components (Yen in
thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost — benefits earned during the year
|
|
¥ |
43,652 |
|
|
¥ |
44,743 |
|
|
¥ |
49,768 |
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
2,625 |
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
4,332 |
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
10,341 |
|
|
|
15,972 |
|
|
|
24,317 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic cost
|
|
¥ |
56,618 |
|
|
¥ |
64,666 |
|
|
¥ |
78,417 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of the
benefit obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries’
plans accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 87 are
as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Change in projected benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Benefit obligations, beginning of year
|
|
¥ |
158,031 |
|
|
¥ |
216,611 |
|
| |
Service cost
|
|
|
44,743 |
|
|
|
49,768 |
|
| |
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
4,332 |
|
| |
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
15,973 |
|
|
|
24,317 |
|
| |
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(6,087 |
) |
|
|
(10,232 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligations, end of year
|
|
¥ |
216,611 |
|
|
¥ |
284,796 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligations, end of year
|
|
¥ |
164,662 |
|
|
¥ |
210,159 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial gains and losses are recognized fully in the year in
which they occur. The weighted-average discount rate used in
determining net periodic cost of the Company and its
subsidiaries’ plans was 2.50%, 2.00% and 2.00% for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively.
The weighted-average discount rate used in determining benefit
obligations as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 was 2.00%.
Assumed salary
IV-66
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
increases ranged from 1% to 4.1% depending on employees’
age for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid (Yen in
thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
¥ |
16,206 |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
25,570 |
|
| |
2007
|
|
|
25,291 |
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
29,482 |
|
| |
2009
|
|
|
34,715 |
|
| |
Years 2010-2014
|
|
|
174,596 |
|
JPC uses a measurement date of December 31 for all of its
unfunded Retirement Allowance Plans.
In addition, employees of the Company and certain of its
subsidiaries participate in a multi-employer defined benefit EPF
plan. The Company contributions to this plan amounted to
¥56,976 thousand, ¥60,322 thousand, and ¥44,510
thousand for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, respectively, and are included in selling, general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
| (15) |
Shareholders’ Equity |
The Commercial Code of Japan, provides that an amount equal to
at least 10% of cash dividends and other cash appropriations
paid be appropriated as a legal reserve until the aggregated
amount of additional paid-in capital and the legal reserve
equals 25% of the issued capital.
The Company paid no cash dividends for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004. The amount available for
dividends under the Commercial Code of Japan is based on the
unappropriated retained earnings recorded in the Company’s
books of account and amounted to nil at December 31, 2004.
On January 30, 2004, the total number of JPC’s
ordinary shares authorized to be issued was increased from
450,000 to 460,000 shares.
On March 5, 2004, JPC transferred ¥8,400,000 thousand
of common stock to additional paid-in capital (¥6,587,064
thousand) and accumulated deficit (¥1,812,936 thousand).
The transfer was approved by the Company’s stockholders in
accordance with the Commercial Code of Japan, which allows a
company to make a purchase of its own shares, as contemplated in
the further transaction noted below, only from specified
additional paid-in capital or retained earnings reserves. JPC
purchased its own shares using the resulting additional paid-in
capital, and elected at the same time to eliminate its
accumulated deficit and generate positive retained earnings on a
single entity basis. On a consolidated basis, JPC continued to
show an accumulated deficit immediately after that transfer.
Such transfer did not impact JPC’s total equity, cash
position or liquidity. Had the Company been subject to corporate
law generally applicable to United States companies for similar
transactions, the accumulated deficit at December 31, 2004
would be ¥1,812,936 thousand more than the amount included
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
During March and April 2004 the following capital transactions
occurred and were based on an independent third party valuation
of the common stock of JPC:
|
|
| |
1) Issuance of 24,000 newly issued shares of common stock
to Sumitomo Corporation at a rate of ¥250,000 per
common share (¥6,000,000 thousand), ¥3,000,000
thousand of which was allocated to common stock with the
remaining ¥3,000,000 thousand allocated to additional
paid-in capital; |
IV-67
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
|
|
| |
2) Redemption of 12,000 shares of common stock from
Sumitomo Corporation at a rate of ¥250,000 per common
share (¥3,000,000 thousand) to be held as treasury stock; |
| |
| |
3) Redemption of 12,000 shares of common stock from
Liberty Programming Japan at a rate of ¥250,000 per
common share (¥3,000,000 thousand) to be held as treasury
stock; |
| |
| |
4) Issuance of 24,000 shares of common stock held in
treasury shares to Liberty Programming Japan II Inc. in
return for 1,000 shares of common stock in Liberty J Sports
Inc. Liberty J Sports Inc. was then converted to a limited
liability company with the Certificate of Conversion filed with
the Delaware Secretary of State, and was subsequently renamed J
Sports LLC. J Sports LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of JPC. |
|
|
| (16) |
Related Party Transactions |
JPC engages in a variety of transactions in the normal course of
business. Significant related party balances, income and
expenditures have been separately identified in the consolidated
balance sheets and statements of operations. A list of related
parties and a description of main types of transactions with
each party follows:
Sumitomo Corporation, shareholder, and its subsidiaries:
television programming advertising revenues, cost of retail
sales, costs of programming and distribution, selling, general
and administrative expenses for staff secondment fees, cash
deposits, property and equipment capital leases, subordinated
loans and interest thereon;
LMI, shareholder, and its subsidiaries: selling, general and
administrative expenses for staff secondment fees and recharge
of project development costs, subordinated loans and interest
thereon;
Discovery Japan, Inc., and Animal Planet Japan, Co. Ltd,
affiliate companies: services and other revenues from cable and
advertising sales activities and broadcasting, marketing and
office support services; costs of programming, distribution
relating to direct-to-home subscription revenue and receipt of
cash advances;
JSports Broadcasting Corporation, affiliate company: services
and other revenues from cable and advertising sales activities
and recovery of staff costs for seconded staff;
InteracTV Co., Ltd, affiliate company: pass through of
direct-to-home television programming subscription revenues to
JPC, costs of programming and distribution payments for
transponder services;
Minority interests in Jupiter Golf Network, Co. Ltd, four
companies holding total of 10.6%: television programming
advertising revenues;
Home Shopping Network Inc.: minority shareholder loans and
interest thereon;
Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd, an affiliated company of
LMI and Sumitomo Corporation at December 31, 2004, and an
indirect consolidated subsidiary of LMI effective
January 1, 2005: television programming cable subscription
revenues, costs of programming and distribution for carriage of
Shop Channel by cable systems.
|
|
| (17) |
Concentration of credit risk |
As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, SkyPerfecTV, an unrelated
party, and Jupiter Telecommunications Co., Ltd
(“JCom”), a related party, agent for sales of
programming delivered via satellite and most significant cable
system operator, respectively, represented concentrations of
credit risk for the Company. For the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, subscription revenues of
¥1,688,119 thousand, ¥2,888,163 thousand and
¥3,095,526 thousand, respectively, received through
SkyPerfect TV, accounted for approximately 35%, 45% and 44%,
respectively, of subscription revenues, and 5%, 6% and 5%,
respectively, of total revenues. As of
IV-68
JUPITER PROGRAMMING CO. LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS — (Continued)
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, SkyPerfect TV accounted
for approximately 7%, 5% and 6%, respectively, of accounts
receivable.
For the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004,
subscription revenues of ¥1,207,749 thousand,
¥1,361,897 thousand and ¥1,464,167 thousand,
respectively, received through JCom, accounted for approximately
25%, 21% and 21%, respectively, of subscription revenues, and
4%, 3% and 2%, respectively, of total revenues. As of
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, JCom accounted for
approximately 7%, 6% and 3%, respectively, of accounts
receivable.
|
|
| (18) |
Commitments, Other Than Leases |
At December 31, 2004, JPC has commitments to purchase
various program rights as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
¥ |
1,131,527 |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
822,490 |
|
| |
2007
|
|
|
37,864 |
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
14,205 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total program rights purchase commitments
|
|
¥ |
2,006,086 |
|
| |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, JPC has commitments for transponder
and uplink services as follows (Yen in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
¥ |
1,217,059 |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
1,265,173 |
|
| |
2007
|
|
|
642,872 |
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
523,984 |
|
| |
2009
|
|
|
403,459 |
|
| |
Thereafter
|
|
|
140,142 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total transponder and uplink services commitments
|
|
¥ |
4,192,689 |
|
| |
|
|
|
JPC contracts, through subsidiaries and affiliate licensed
broadcasting companies, to utilize capacity on three satellites
from two transponder service providers. JPC channels contract
for a portion of the capacity available on a transponder
according to the bandwidth needs of individual channels.
Transponder service contracts are generally ten years in
duration. Service fees are based on fixed rates or a fixed
portion plus a variable portion based on platform subscriber
numbers. Termination is possible on a channel-by-channel basis.
One transponder service provider charges termination penalty
fees, the other does not charge a fee until the last channel
from one licensed broadcaster terminates. Due to the unclear
nature of the responsibility for termination fees, commitments
are disclosed for the full minimum commitment amounts under the
service contracts.
JPC has capital equipment purchase commitments amounting to
¥2,024,206 thousand at December 31, 2004 that must be
expended by December 31, 2005.
IV-69
EXHIBIT INDEX
| |
|
|
|
|
| Exhibit No. | |
|
Description |
| | |
|
|
|
2 — Plan of Acquisition Reorganization, Arrangement,
Liquidation or Succession: |
| |
2 |
.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 17, 2005,
among New Cheetah, Inc. (now known as Liberty Global, Inc.), the
Registrant, UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (“UGC”), Cheetah
Acquisition Corp. and Tiger Global Acquisition Corp.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
January 17, 2005) |
|
3 — Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws: |
| |
3 |
.1 |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10, dated
April 2, 2004 (File No. 000-50671) (the
“Form 10”)) |
| |
3 |
.2 |
|
Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 10, dated
May 25, 2004 (File No. 000-50671) (the
“Form 10 Amendment”)) |
|
4 — Instruments Defining the Rights of Securities
Holders, including Indentures: |
| |
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen certificate for shares of Series A common stock,
par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 10) |
| |
4 |
.2 |
|
Specimen certificate for shares of Series B common stock,
par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 10) |
| |
4 |
.3 |
|
Indenture, dated as of April 6, 2004, between UGC and The
Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1
to UGC’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
April 6, 2004 (File No. 000-496-58) (the
“UGC April 2004 8-K”)) |
| |
4 |
.4 |
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 6, 2004,
between UGC and Credit Suisse First Boston (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the UGC April 2004 8-K) |
| |
4 |
.5 |
|
Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated March 7, 2005,
among UPC Broadband Holding B.V. (“UPC
Broadband”) and UPC Financing Partnership (“UPC
Financing”), as Borrowers, the guarantors listed therein,
and TD Bank Europe Limited, as Facility Agent and Security
Agent, including as Schedule 3 thereto the Restated
€1,072,000,000
Senior Secured Credit Facility, originally dated
January 16, 2004, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, the
guarantors listed therein, the banks and financial institutions
listed therein as Initial Facility D Lenders, TD Bank
Europe Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the
facility agents under the Existing Facility (as defined therein)
(the “2004 Credit Agreement”) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.32 to UGC’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K, dated March 14, 2005 (File
No. 000-496-58) (the “UGC 2004 10-K”)) |
| |
4 |
.6 |
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated June 24,
2004, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional Facility E
Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to UGC’s Current Report on
Form 8-K, dated June 29, 2004
(File No. 000-496-58)) |
| |
4 |
.7 |
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated December 2,
2004, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional
Facility F Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to UGC’s
Current Report on Form 8-K, dated December 2, 2004
(File No. 000-496-58)) |
| |
4 |
.8 |
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated March 9,
2005, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional
Facility G Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the
UGC 2004 10-K) |
| |
4 |
.9 |
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated March 7,
2005, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional Facility H
Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the UGC 2004 10-K |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Exhibit No. | |
|
Description |
| | |
|
|
| |
4 |
.10 |
|
Additional Facility Accession Agreement, dated March 9,
2005, among UPC Broadband, as Borrower, TD Bank Europe
Limited, as Facility Agent and Security Agent, and the banks and
financial institutions listed therein as Additional
Facility I Lenders, under the 2004 Credit Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the
UGC 2004 10-K) |
| |
4 |
.11 |
|
Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated March 7, 2005,
among UPC Broadband and UPC Financing, as Borrowers, the
guarantors listed therein, TD Bank Europe Limited and
Toronto Dominion (Texas), Inc., as Facility Agents, and
TD Bank Europe Limited, as Security Agent, including as
Schedule 3 thereto the Restated Credit Agreement,
€3,500,000,000
and US$347,500,000 and
€95,000,000
Senior Secured Credit Facility, originally dated
October 26, 2000, among UPC Broadband and UPC Financing, as
Borrowers, the guarantors listed therein, the Lead Arrangers
listed therein, the banks and financial institutions listed
therein as Original Lenders, TD Bank Europe Limited and
Toronto-Dominion (Texas) Inc., as Facility Agents, and
TD Bank Europe Limited, as Security Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the UGC 2004 10-K) |
| |
4 |
.12 |
|
The Registrant undertakes to furnish to the Securities and
Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of all instruments
with respect to long-term debt not filed herewith |
|
10 — Material Contracts: |
| |
10 |
.1 |
|
Reorganization Agreement, dated as of May 20, 2004, among
Liberty Media Corporation (“Liberty”), the Registrant
and the other parties named therein (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10 |
.2 |
|
Form of Facilities and Services Agreement between Liberty and
the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10 |
.3 |
|
Agreement for Aircraft Joint Ownership and Management, dated as
of May 21, 2004, between Liberty and the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the
Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10 |
.4 |
|
Form of Tax Sharing Agreement between Liberty and the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the
Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10 |
.5 |
|
Form of Credit Facility between Liberty and the Registrant
(terminated in accordance with its terms) (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10 |
.6 |
|
Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10 |
.7 |
|
Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Non-Employee Director
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2
to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10 |
.8 |
|
Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Incentive Plan
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of June 7,
2004, between John C. Malone and the Registrant
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7(A) to
Mr. Malone’s Schedule 13D/ A (Amendment
No. 1) with respect to the Registrant’s common stock,
dated July 14, 2004 (File No. 005-79904)) |
| |
10 |
.9 |
|
Form of Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Incentive Plan
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q, dated August 16, 2004 (File
No. 000-50671) (the “LMI June 2004 10-Q”)) |
| |
10 |
.10 |
|
Form of Liberty Media International, Inc. 2004 Non-Employee
Director Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the LMI June
2004 10-Q) |
| |
10 |
.11 |
|
Liberty Media International, Inc. Transitional Stock Adjustment
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the
Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, dated
June 23, 2004 (File No. 333-116790)) |
| |
10 |
.12 |
|
Description of Director Compensation Policy* |
| |
10 |
.13 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its
Directors* |
| |
10 |
.14 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Registrant and its
Executive Officers* |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Exhibit No. | |
|
Description |
| | |
|
|
| |
10 |
.15 |
|
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of UGC, effective
June 1, 1993, amended and restated as of January 22,
2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to
UGC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 15,
2004 (File No. 000-496-58) (the “UGC 2003 10-K”)) |
| |
10 |
.16 |
|
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of UGC, effective
March 20, 1998, amended and restated as of January 22,
2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the UGC
2003 10-K) |
| |
10 |
.17 |
|
2003 Equity Incentive Plan of UGC, effective September 1,
2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the UGC
2003 10-K) |
| |
10 |
.18 |
|
Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement, dated as of
May 21, 2004, among the Registrant, Liberty Media
International Holdings, LLC, Robert R. Bennett,
Miranda Curtis, Graham Hollis, Yasushige Nishimura, Liberty
Jupiter, Inc., and, solely for purposes of Section 9
thereof, Liberty (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.23 to the Form 10 Amendment) |
| |
10 |
.19 |
|
Standstill Agreement between UGC and Liberty, dated as of
January 5, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to UGC’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated January 5, 2004 (File No. 000-496-58)) |
| |
10 |
.20 |
|
Standstill Agreement among UGC, Liberty and the parties named
therein, dated January 30, 2002 (terminated except as to
(i) UGC’s obligations under the final sentence of
Section 9(b) and (ii) Section 7B and the related
definitions in Section 1 as set forth in, and as modified
by, the Letter Agreement referenced in
Exhibit 10.21)(incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 to UGC’s Registration Statement on
Form S-1, dated February 14, 2002
(File No. 333-82776)) |
| |
10 |
.21 |
|
Letter Agreement, dated November 12, 2003, between UGC and
Liberty (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
UGC’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated
November 12, 2003 (File No. 000-496-58)) |
| |
10 |
.22 |
|
Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2003,
among Liberty and the Stockholders of UGC named therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7(j) to
Liberty’s Schedule 13D/ A with respect to UGC’s
Class A common stock, dated August 21, 2003) |
| |
10 |
.23 |
|
Amendment to Share Exchange Agreement, dated as of
December 22, 2003, among Liberty and the Stockholders of
UGC named on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Liberty’s Registration
Statement on Form S-3, dated December 24, 2003
(File No. 333-111564)) |
| |
10 |
.24 |
|
Stock and Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 15,
2004, among Suez SA, MédiaRéseaux SA, UPC
France Holding BV and UGC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to UGC’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
dated July 1, 2004 (File No. 000-496-58) (the
“UGC July 2004 8-K”)) |
| |
10 |
.25 |
|
Amendment to the Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 1,
2004, among Suez SA, MédiaRéseaux SA, UPC
France Holding BV and UGC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the UGC July 2004 8-K) |
| |
10 |
.26 |
|
Shareholders Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2004, among
UGC, UPC France Holding BV and Suez SA (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the UGC July 2004 8-K) |
| |
10 |
.27 |
|
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement dated November 26,
2004, among Liberty Japan, Inc., Liberty Japan II, Inc.,
LMI Holdings Japan, LLC, Liberty Kanto, Inc., Liberty
Jupiter, Inc. and Sumitomo Corporation, and, solely with respect
to Sections 3.1(c), 3.1(d) and 16.22 thereof, the
Registrant* |
|
21 — List of Subsidiaries* |
|
23 — Consent of Experts and Counsel: |
| |
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP* |
| |
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of KPMG AZSA & Co* |
| |
23 |
.3 |
|
Consent of KPMG AZSA & Co* |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Exhibit No. | |
|
Description |
| | |
|
|
|
31 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification: |
| |
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer* |
| |
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Senior Vice President and Treasurer* |
| |
31 |
.3 |
|
Certification of Senior Vice President and Controller* |
|
32 — Section 1350 Certification* |