Back to GetFilings.com
United States Securities and Exchange
Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
2002
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-14278
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
| WASHINGTON
(STATE OF INCORPORATION) |
|
91-1144442
(I.R.S. ID) |
ONE MICROSOFT WAY, REDMOND, WASHINGTON 98052-6399
(425) 882-8080
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
COMMON STOCK
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of July 31, 2002 was $215,553,343,213.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of July 31, 2002 was 5,378,746,853.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be delivered to shareholders in
connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held November 5, 2002 are incorporated by reference into Part III.
FORM 10-K
For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2002
INDEX
| Part I |
|
|
|
|
| Item 1. |
|
|
|
1 |
| Item 2. |
|
|
|
8 |
| Item 3. |
|
|
|
8 |
| Item 4. |
|
|
|
8 |
| |
|
|
|
9 |
| |
| Part II |
|
|
|
|
| Item 5. |
|
|
|
11 |
| Item 6. |
|
|
|
11 |
| Item 7. |
|
|
|
12 |
| Item 7a. |
|
|
|
18 |
| Item 8. |
|
|
|
19 |
| Item 9. |
|
|
|
39 |
| |
| Part III |
|
|
|
|
| Item 10. |
|
|
|
40 |
| Item 11. |
|
|
|
40 |
| Item 12. |
|
|
|
40 |
| Item 13. |
|
|
|
40 |
| |
| Part IV |
|
|
|
|
| Item 14. |
|
|
|
41 |
| |
|
|
|
42 |
| |
|
|
|
42 |
Part I
Item 1
PART I
GENERAL
Microsoft Corporation (the “Company” or “Microsoft”) was founded as a partnership in 1975 and incorporated in 1981. Microsoft’s mission is to enable people and businesses
throughout the world to realize their full potential, and the Company’s vision is empowering people through great software—any time, any place, and on any device. Microsoft develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of
software products for a multitude of computing devices. Microsoft software products include scalable operating systems for servers, personal computers (PCs), and intelligent devices; server applications for client/server environments; information
worker productivity applications; business solutions applications; and software development tools. During fiscal 2002, Microsoft launched Xbox, the Company’s next-generation video game system. The Company’s online efforts include the MSN
network of Internet products and services and alliances with companies involved with broadband access and various forms of digital interactivity. Microsoft licenses consumer software programs; sells hardware devices; provides consulting services;
and trains and certifies system integrators and developers.
Microsoft also researches and develops advanced technologies for future software products. A
significant portion of the Company’s focus is on Microsoft’s .NET architecture. Using common industry standards based on XML, a universal language for describing and exchanging data, the Company’s goal is to enable seamless sharing of
information across many platforms and programming languages, and over the Internet, with XML Web services. In addition, Microsoft has embarked on a long-term initiative called Trustworthy Computing, which aims to bring an enhanced level of security,
privacy, reliability, and business integrity to computer systems.
PRODUCTS
During fiscal 2002, Microsoft had four operating segments based on its product and service offerings: Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services; Consumer Software,
Services, and Devices; Consumer Commerce Investments; and Other. See Note 20 of the Notes to Financial Statements for financial information regarding segment reporting.
DESKTOP AND ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AND SERVICES
Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services includes
Desktop Applications; Desktop Platforms; and Enterprise Software and Services. For segment reporting purposes, Desktop Applications includes revenue from Microsoft Office; Microsoft Project; Visio; client access licenses (CALs) for Windows NT Server
and Windows 2000 Server, Exchange, and BackOffice; Microsoft Great Plains; and bCentral. Desktop Platforms includes revenue from Windows XP Professional and Home; Windows 2000 Professional; Windows NT Workstation; Windows Millennium Edition; Windows
98; and other desktop operating systems. Enterprise Software and Services includes Server Platforms; Server Applications; Developer Tools and Services; and Enterprise Services.
DESKTOP APPLICATIONS
Microsoft Office. Microsoft Office
is a software product featuring commonly used desktop functionality. The product is based upon a document-centric concept, with common commands and extensive use of cross-application capabilities. Microsoft Office is available in several versions
for the Windows and Macintosh operating systems. Microsoft Office XP, the latest Microsoft Office release, helps users complete common business tasks, including word processing, electronic mail (e-mail), presentations, and data management, with
features like smart tags, task panes, integrated e-mail, document recovery, and send for review. The various versions of Microsoft Office include the word processor Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, Microsoft Outlook personal information
management and e-mail communication client, Microsoft PowerPoint presentation graphics program, and may include Microsoft Access database management application, Microsoft FrontPage Web site creation and management tool, and Microsoft
Publisher business desktop publishing program. Most of these applications are also licensed separately.
Other Desktop Application
Products. The Company also offers other stand-alone desktop application products. Microsoft Project is a project management program for scheduling, organizing, and analyzing tasks, deadlines, and resources. Visio is a
diagramming program that helps people visualize and communicate ideas, information, and systems.
Client Access
Licenses. A client access license gives its holder the legal right to access a computer running a Microsoft server product and the services supported by the server using a client computer.
Microsoft Great Plains. Microsoft Great Plains offers a range of integrated business and accounting products, including Dynamics, Solomon,
and eEnterprise. Dynamics provides Internet-ready accounting and business management capabilities for small- to mid-sized companies. Solomon offers a full range of e-business and accounting applications for small- to mid-sized companies. eEnterprise
supports mid-sized to larger companies by providing a collaborative environment for information management and sharing.
Part I
Item 1
bCentral. Microsoft’s small businesses portal, bCentral,
includes Site Manager, a Web site management and hosting service which empowers small businesses to easily create and manage their own Web sites, while allowing for higher-end editing in Microsoft FrontPage, and LinkExchange, which provides services
to small businesses and Web site owners to increase their online traffic and sales with free advertising banner ads on their site in exchange for placing ads on other network sites.
DESKTOP PLATFORMS
Windows XP. Microsoft launched Windows
XP in October 2001. Windows XP extends the personal computing experience by uniting PCs, devices, and services, while enhancing reliability, security, and performance. Windows XP Home Edition is designed for individuals or families and includes
experiences for digital photo, music, video, home networking, and communications. Windows XP Professional includes all the features of Home Edition, plus remote access, security, performance, manageability, and multilingual features to help users
improve productivity and connectivity.
Windows 2000 Professional. The successor to Windows NT Workstation, Windows
2000 Professional operating system combines features to create a mainstream operating system for desktop and notebook computing in all organizations. Windows 2000 Professional contains the enhanced business features of Windows 98 such as Plug and
Play, easy-to-use user interface, and power management and integrates the strengths of Windows NT Workstation including standards-based security, manageability, and reliability.
Windows NT Workstation. A fully integrated, multitasking 32-bit PC operating system, Windows NT Workstation provides improved security features, robustness, and portability. Windows
NT Workstation combines the Windows 98 operating system interface and usability features with the reliability and security of Windows NT for the business environment.
Windows Millennium Edition. Windows Millennium Edition (Me) operating system is designed specifically for home users, including capabilities to manage digital photos and music, work with video,
create a home network, and communicate with other consumers.
Windows 98. The successor to Windows 95, Windows 98 is
a personal computer operating system that provides a Web-oriented user interface and better system performance along with easier system diagnostics and maintenance. Windows 98 supports graphics, sound, and multimedia technologies and provides the
ability to easily add and remove peripheral devices and support for Universal Serial Bus (USB).
ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AND SERVICES
Windows 2000 Server, Advanced Server, and Datacenter Server. Windows 2000 Server is a multipurpose network operating
system for businesses of all sizes. Windows 2000 Advanced Server operating system is ideal for e-commerce and line-of-business applications and provides enhanced performance and scalability through symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) and extended memory
support. Windows Datacenter Server operating system is built for large-scale line-of-business and enterprise backend usage and supports server consolidation and enhanced scalability.
Microsoft .NET Enterprise Servers. Microsoft .NET Enterprise Servers include Microsoft SQL Server, Exchange Server, Application Center, BizTalk Server, Commerce Server, Content
Management Server, Host Integration Server, Internet Security and Acceleration Server, Microsoft Operations Manager, Mobile Information Server, and SharePoint Portal Server.
SQL Server is a comprehensive data management and analysis platform that enables rapid delivery, dependable performance and secure operation of connected applications.
Exchange Server is a messaging and collaboration server that provides e-mail, group scheduling, task management, contact management and document routing
capabilities.
Application Center is Microsoft’s deployment and management tool for high-availability Web applications built on the
Microsoft Windows 2000 operating system.
BizTalk Server enables companies to rapidly build and deploy integrated business processes within
their organizations and with partners.
Commerce Server provides a comprehensive set of features for building scalable, user-centric,
business-to-consumer, and business-to-business e-commerce sites.
Content Management Server is the enterprise Web content management system
that enables companies to quickly and efficiently build, deploy, and maintain highly dynamic Internet, intranet, and extranet Web sites.
Host Integration
Server extends Microsoft Windows applications to other systems by providing application, data, and network integration.
Internet Security and
Acceleration Server provides secure, fast, and manageable Internet connectivity. It integrates an extensible, multilayer enterprise firewall and a scalable high-performance Web cache.
Microsoft Operations Manager delivers enterprise-class solutions for operations management of Windows 2000, the Microsoft Active Directory service, and other component services in Windows
2000, as well as other Microsoft .NET Enterprise Server applications such as Exchange and SQL Server.
Mobile Information Server mobile-enables
the enterprise, extending the reach of Microsoft .NET Enterprise applications, enterprise data, and intranet content to the mobile user.
SharePoint Portal
Server extends the capabilities of Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office by offering information workers a powerful new way to easily organize, find, and share information. It combines the ability to easily create corporate Web
portals with document management, content searching, and team collaboration features.
Part I
Item 1
Other Servers. Small Business Server is the flexible network
solution designed to help businesses with up to 50 computers. Systems Management Server helps centrally manage the distributed environment with integrated features, including hardware inventory, software inventory and metering, software distribution
and installation, and remote troubleshooting tools.
Developer Tools and Services. Software development tools and
computer languages allow software developers to write programs in a particular computer language and translate programs into a binary machine-readable set of commands that activate and instruct various hardware devices. The Company develops and
markets a number of software development environments and language compilers. In February 2002, Microsoft launched Visual Studio .NET, a comprehensive tool for rapidly building and deploying XML Web services and applications. Visual Studio .NET
provides software developers with powerful tools to rapidly design broad-reach Web applications for any device and any platform, and to build powerful Windows applications. Microsoft Visual C++ is the Company’s development system for
Windows-based application development. Microsoft Visual C# offers beginning and intermediate developers with C++ or Java experience a modern language and robust development environment for creating XML Web services and Microsoft .NET-based
applications for Windows and the Web. The Microsoft Visual Basic development system provides easy access to a wide variety of data sources by integrating the Microsoft Access database engine and the ability to take advantage of investments in
commercial applications. The Microsoft Visual InterDev development system includes integrated, team-based development tools for building Web-based applications based on HTML, Script, and components written in any language. Developers can subscribe
to the Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN) information service and receive periodic updates via CD-ROMs, magazines, and several online information services. In addition, Microsoft receives certification fees through the Microsoft Certified
Professional (MCP) program, a program that provides credentials for those who have demonstrated in-depth knowledge of at least one Microsoft product.
Enterprise Services. Microsoft Enterprise Services assist organizations with every stage of technology planning, building, deployment, and support. Specializing in IT solutions for the enterprise,
Microsoft offers a full range of consulting services for advance technology requirements, including custom solutions services, enterprise application planning, architecture and design services, and proof-of-concept services. The Company
provides product support services aligned to customer segments, partner segments, and communities.
CONSUMER SOFTWARE, SERVICES,
AND DEVICES
Consumer Software, Services, and Devices includes Xbox video game system, MSN Internet Access, MSN Network Services, PC and Online
Games, Learning and Productivity Software, Mobility, and Embedded Systems.
Xbox. Microsoft Xbox, released in fiscal
2002, is Microsoft’s next-generation video game console system that delivers high quality graphics and audio gameplay experiences. For information on Xbox manufacturing, see “Manufacturing” below. Games for the Xbox are developed by
Microsoft Game Studios, such as Halo and Project Gotham Racing, and by third-party game development partners, such as Tecmo’s Dead or Alive 3. Xbox Live, an online service available to owners of Xbox systems, is expected to be launched in the
second quarter of fiscal 2003 and will allow online game play among users of online-enabled Xbox games.
MSN Internet
Access. MSN Internet access is Microsoft’s service for accessing the Web and experiencing a wide range of rich online services and content. MSN Internet access subscribers can access their account from multiple
sources, including a computer, television, Internet appliances, and Personal Data Assistants.
MSN Network
Services. The MSN network provides services, content and advertising on the Internet, encompassing MSN Search, Messenger, eShop, Hotmail, Money, and Music, as well as other services and content. MSN Search makes Web
searches more useful by providing users with the most relevant results for the most popular search queries on the Web. MSN Messenger is a free Internet messaging service that enables users to see when others are online and exchange instant messages
with them. MSN eShop is a one-stop online shopping resource. MSN Hotmail is the world’s leading free Web-based e-mail service. MSN Money is a complete online personal financial service that combines finance tools and content from Microsoft with
exclusive investment news and analysis from CNBC. MSN Music provides consumers with one place online to find old favorites, as well as discover new music, and delivers a high quality listening experience.
PC and Online Games. The Company offers a line of entertainment products from classic software games to online games, simulations, sport
products, and strategy games. Microsoft Flight Simulator is a popular aircraft flight simulation product. Other games include Age of Empires, Dungeon Siege, MechWarrior, Microsoft Links, Train Simulator, Zoo Tycoon, and other action and sports
titles. Zone.com is a gaming community on the Internet allowing multiplayer gaming competitions of Microsoft’s popular CD-ROM games and classic card, board, and puzzle games.
Learning and Productivity Software. Learning titles include Microsoft Encarta Reference Library, a complete research and reference source with a multimedia encyclopedia database
with interactive information, an interactive world atlas with three-dimensional maps, a world English dictionary, Encarta Africana, Researcher, and an online version with monthly updates. Titles for children include a series of products based
on the popular children’s book and television series, Scholastic’s The Magic School Bus. Microsoft’s productivity offerings include Microsoft Works, an integrated software program that contains basic word processing, spreadsheet, and
database capabilities that allows the easy exchange of information from one tool to another. Microsoft Picture It! brand of products includes Picture It! Photo, with photo editing tools and wizards to easily capture, correct and create photos, and
Picture It! Publishing, used to create greeting cards and other print and Web based products. Microsoft Money offers leading tools and resources to conduct a wide range of financial activities. The
Part I
Item 1
Works Suite provides a comprehensive collection of software, including Microsoft Works, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Money, Microsoft Encarta encyclopedia, Microsoft Picture It! Photo, and Microsoft
Streets & Trips.
Mobility and Embedded Systems. Microsoft develops a number of software platforms for mobile
computing. Products such as Pocket PC, Pocket PC Phone Edition, and Microsoft Windows Powered Smartphone are designed to enable a variety of mobile scenarios. Microsoft’s embedded offerings include two embedded operating systems, Microsoft
Windows CE and Microsoft Windows NT Embedded, as well as device specific solutions. Microsoft Windows CE, a robust real-time embedded operating system, is targeted at mobile 32-bit devices. Microsoft Windows NT Embedded, based on the desktop and
server versions of Microsoft’s operating systems, is targeted at higher-end embedded products and devices. Both embedded operating systems offer integrated tool sets to enable embedded system developers to quickly create sophisticated embedded
device and application solutions. Microsoft Mobile Information Server is a scalable and reliable mobile applications server that provides enterprise customers and mobile operators with a rich platform for extending .NET Enterprise application and
securely delivering real-time, wireless data to mobile devices.
CONSUMER COMMERCE INVESTMENTS
Consumer Commerce Investments include the HomeAdvisor online real estate service and the CarPoint online automotive service.
HomeAdvisor online real estate service. The HomeAdvisor online real estate service is a complete guide to the home-buying process and
provides comprehensive tools for finding homes and loans on the Internet. The service includes customized search features, worksheets and calculators, and editorial content and home-buying advice.
CarPoint online automotive service. The CarPoint online automotive service is the leading online automotive marketplace, visited by more than
7 million consumers each month. With details on more than 10,000 car models and 100,000 used vehicles, users can research and compare cars of virtually every make and model, identify local dealers, and receive instructions for post-purchase service
and maintenance.
Expedia, Inc. Expedia was included in the Consumer Commerce Investments segment until Microsoft
sold its interest in Expedia to USA Networks, Inc. in February 2002. Expedia, Inc. operates Expedia.com, a leading online travel service. Expedia.com provides air, car, and hotel booking, vacation package and cruise offerings, destination
information, and mapping.
OTHER
Hardware. The Hardware Group develops and markets several PC accessories including the Microsoft IntelliMouse family of hand-held pointing devices using the IntelliEye optical technology. Hardware also
markets several types of keyboards including the Microsoft Natural Keyboard, an ergonomically designed keyboard, the Internet Keyboard featuring two USB ports and Internet hot keys, and a new Wireless Desktop product including wireless keyboard and
mouse. Also included in the Hardware Group’s portfolio of devices are SideWinder game controllers and force feedback joysticks with realistic performance technology to use with PC games.
Microsoft Press. Microsoft Press offers comprehensive learning and training resources to help new users, power users, and professionals get the most from Microsoft
technology through books, CDs, self-paced training kits, and videos that are created to accommodate different learning styles and preferences. Microsoft Press books are authored by professional and technical writers, both by Microsoft employees and
independent authors.
SEGMENT REPORTING
In fiscal 2003, the Company will begin reporting the following operating segments: Client; Information Worker; MSN; Home and Entertainment; CE Mobility; Server and Tools; and Business Solutions. These changes are designed to
provide a comprehensive end-to-end financial view of Microsoft’s key businesses; promote better alignment of strategies and objectives between development, sales, marketing, and services organizations; provide for more timely and rational
allocation of development, sales, and marketing resources within businesses; and focus strategic planning efforts on key objectives and initiatives and give business owners more autonomy in detailed planning.
EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
The Company has
entered into joint venture arrangements to take advantage of creative talent and content from other organizations. For example, Microsoft owns 50 percent of MSNBC Cable L.L.C., a 24-hour cable news and information channel, and 50 percent of MSNBC
Interactive News L.L.C., an interactive online news service. National Broadcasting Company (NBC) owns the remaining 50 percent of these two joint ventures.
Part I
Item 1
PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
During fiscal years 2000, 2001, and 2002, research and development expense was $3.77 billion, $4.38 billion, and $4.31 billion, respectively. Those amounts represented 16.4%, 17.3%, and 15.2%,
respectively, of revenue in each of those years. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the amortization of goodwill was discontinued in fiscal 2002. The amount of
goodwill amortization included in research and development expense in fiscal years 2000 and 2001 was $232 million and $272 million, respectively. The Company plans to continue significant expenditures for research and product development.
Most of the Company’s software products are developed internally. The Company also purchases technology, licenses intellectual property rights, and oversees
third-party development and localization of certain products. Internal development allows Microsoft to maintain closer technical control over its products and gives the Company the freedom to designate which modifications and enhancements are most
important and when they should be implemented. Microsoft works on devising innovative solutions to computer science problems, such as making computers easier to use, designing software for the next generation of hardware, improving the software
design process, and investigating the mathematical underpinnings of computer science. The Company has created a substantial body of proprietary development tools and has evolved development methodologies for creating and enhancing its products.
These tools and methodologies are also designed to simplify a product’s portability among different operating systems, microprocessors, or computing devices. Product documentation is generally created internally. The Company strives to become
informed at the earliest possible time about changing usage patterns and hardware advances that may affect software design. Before releasing new software platforms, Microsoft provides to software vendors a range of development, training, testing
resources, and guidelines for developing applications.
The software industry is characterized by rapid technological change, which requires constant attention to
computing technology trends, shifting consumer demand, and rapid product innovation. The pace of change is accelerating as the computing needs of our customers move beyond the PC toward intelligent devices and appliances, such as the Tablet PC.
Tablet PCs extend the power of laptop computers running Windows XP with enhanced capabilities such as handwriting and speech input.
The Company believes that
making its products trustworthy is critical to their success and has launched a company-wide effort called Trustworthy Computing. Trustworthy Computing has four pillars: reliability, security, privacy, and business integrity. Reliability means that
a computer system is dependable, is available when needed, and performs as expected and at appropriate levels. Security means that a system is resilient to attack, and that the confidentiality, integrity and availability of both the system and its
data are protected. Privacy means that individuals have the ability to control data about themselves and that those using such data faithfully adhere to fair information principles. Business integrity, in this context, is about being responsible to
customers and helping them find appropriate solutions for their business issues, addressing problems with products or services, and being open in interactions with customers. While the Company is continuing to invest significantly in delivering new
capabilities that customers ask for, Microsoft is making security improvements a high priority.
Microsoft .NET is Microsoft’s platform for XML Web services.
XML Web services allow applications to communicate and share data over the Internet or an intranet, regardless of operating system or programming language. The Microsoft .NET platform includes a comprehensive family of products, built on XML and
other Internet industry standards, which provide for each aspect of developing, managing, using, and experiencing XML Web services. There are five areas where Microsoft is building the .NET platform today: Tools, Servers, XML Web Services,
Clients, and .NET Experiences. In the Tools area, Visual Studio .NET and the Microsoft .NET framework supply a complete solution for developers to build, deploy, and run XML Web services. They maximize the performance, reliability, and security of
XML Web services. The .NET Enterprise Servers, including the Windows 2000 Server family, make up Microsoft .NET’s server infrastructure for deploying, managing, and orchestrating XML Web services. Designed with mission-critical performance in
mind, they provide enterprises with the agility they need to integrate their systems, applications, and partners through XML Web services, and the flexibility to adapt to changing business requirements. Clients are PCs, laptops, workstations,
phones, handheld computers, Tablet PCs, game consoles, and other smart devices. These smart devices use software that supports XML Web services, which enable users to access their data regardless of the location, type, and number of clients used.
Smart clients and devices leverage XML Web services to create .NET experiences that allow users to access information across the Internet and from stand-alone applications in an integrated way.
To best serve the needs of users around the world, Microsoft “localizes” many of its products to reflect local languages and conventions and to improve the quality and usability of the product in
international markets. Localizing a product might require modifying the user interface, altering dialog boxes, and translating text. In Japanese versions, for example, all user messages and documentation are in Japanese with monetary references in
the Japanese yen. Various Microsoft products have been localized into more than 30 languages.
MANUFACTURING
Microsoft contracts out most of its manufacturing activities to third parties. Outside manufacturers produce the Xbox, various retail software packaged
products, and hardware. There are other custom manufacturers Microsoft could use in the event outsourced manufacturing becomes unavailable from current vendors. The Company generally has multiple sources for raw materials, supplies, and components
and is often able to acquire component parts and materials on a volume discount basis. The graphics processing unit (GPU) for the Xbox was custom designed and is produced by NVIDIA Corporation. Quality control tests are performed on purchased parts,
CD-ROMs, and other products.
Part I
Item 1
OPERATIONS
The Company has regional operations centers in Ireland, Singapore, and the Greater Seattle area. The regional centers support all operations, including information processing, vendor management and logistics by
geographical regions. The regional center in Dublin, Ireland supports the European, African, and Middle East regions, the center in Singapore supports the Asia Pacific region, and the center in the Greater Seattle area supports North and South
America. Microsoft Licensing, Inc. (MSLI), a wholly-owned subsidiary in Reno, Nevada, manages the Company’s original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and certain organizational licensing operations.
DISTRIBUTION, SALES AND MARKETING
Microsoft
distributes its products primarily through the following channels: OEM; volume licensing; online services and products; and distributors and retailers. In fiscal 2002, Microsoft had three major geographic sales and marketing regions: the South
Pacific and Americas Region; the Europe, Middle East, and Africa Region; and the Asia Region. Beginning with fiscal 2003, the Company’s geographic sales and marketing organization was modified to remove the South Pacific region from the
Americas organization, and combine it with Asia. Sales of volume licenses and packaged software products via these channels are primarily to distributors and resellers.
OEM. Microsoft operating systems are licensed primarily to OEMs under agreements that grant the OEMs the right to distribute copies of the Company’s products with their computing devices,
principally PCs. The Company also markets and licenses certain server operating systems, desktop applications, hardware devices, and consumer software programs to OEMs under similar arrangements. In almost all cases, the products are distributed
under Microsoft trademarks. The Company has OEM agreements covering one or more of its products with virtually all of the major PC OEMs, including Acer, Actebis, Dell, eMachines, Fujitsu, Fujitsu Siemens Computers, Gateway, HP, IBM, NEC, Samsung,
Sony, and Toshiba. A substantial amount of OEM business is also conducted with system builders, which are low-volume customized PC vendors.
Volume Licensing. The Microsoft Enterprise Agreement program is a licensing program designed to provide a flexible licensing and service solution tailored to customers making a long-term licensing
commitment. The agreements are designed to simplify license administration, payment terms, and the contract process. The Microsoft Select program offers flexible software acquisition, licensing, and maintenance options specially customized to meet
the needs of large multinational organizations. Marketing efforts and fulfillment are generally coordinated with large account resellers. The Microsoft Open program is a licensing program that is targeted for small- and medium-sized
organizations. It is available through the reseller channel and offers discounts based on initial purchase volumes. The Microsoft Enterprise Agreement and Software Assurance under the Select and Open programs provide customers the right to
install any new release of products covered in the licensing agreement during the term of their coverage.
Network Service
Providers. Microsoft Network Service Providers (NSP) work with a variety of companies worldwide to help them develop and deploy end-to-end network solutions based on Microsoft platforms. NSPs focus on key network service
industries including telecommunications and wireless companies and hosts.
Online Services and Products. Microsoft
distributes online content and services through MSN Access, MSN Network Services, bCentral small business portal, and other online services. MSN Access delivers simple, personalized Internet access, useful content, services and tools using MSN
Internet Explorer. MSN Network Services delivers advertising and other services including online search, shopping, and messaging capabilities to Internet users. bCentral provides the tools and expertise for small-business owners to build, market and
manage their businesses online. Other services delivered online include MSDN subscription content and updates, periodic product updates, and online technical and practice readiness resources to support Microsoft partners in developing and selling
Microsoft products and solutions.
Distributors and Resellers. The Company distributes products in the finished goods
channels primarily to independent non-exclusive distributors and resellers. Distributors and resellers include Ingram Micro, Tech Data, Level 3 Communications, SOFTBANK, Software House International, ASAP Software Express, and Happinet
Corporation. Microsoft has a network of field sales representatives and field support personnel who solicit orders from distributors and resellers and provide product training and sales support.
CUSTOMERS
The Company’s customers include individual consumers, small-
and medium-sized organizations, enterprises, educational institutions, Internet Service Providers (ISPs), application developers, and OEMs. Consumers and organizations obtain Microsoft products primarily through resellers and OEMs, which include
certain Microsoft products with their computing devices. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of revenue in 2000, 2001, or 2002.
Part I
Item 1
COMPETITION
The software business is intensely competitive and subject to rapid technological change. As the company pursues its largest strategic initiative, Microsoft .NET, the Company could experience more intense
competition during the transition from the traditional core businesses to its new products based on the .NET architecture. The Company continues to face movement from PC-based applications to server-based applications or Web-based application
hosting services, from proprietary software to open source software such as the Linux operating system, and from PCs to Internet-based devices. A number of Microsoft’s most significant competitors, including IBM, Sun Microsystems, Oracle,
and AOL-Time Warner, are collaborating with one another on various initiatives directed at competing with Microsoft. These initiatives relate in part to efforts to move software from individual PCs to centrally managed servers, which would present
significant challenges to the Company’s historical business model. Other competitive collaborative efforts include the development of new platform technologies that are intended to replicate much of the value of Microsoft Windows operating
systems. New computing form factors, including non-PC information devices, are gaining popularity and competing with PCs running Microsoft’s software products.
Microsoft faces formidable competition in these new areas and in all areas of its current business activities. The rapid pace of technological change, particularly in the area of Internet platforms and services, continually creates
new opportunities for existing competitors and start-ups and can quickly render existing technologies less valuable. Global software piracy—the unlawful copying and distribution of Microsoft’s copyrighted software
products—deprives the Company of large amounts of revenue on an annual basis.
The Company’s competitive position may be adversely affected in the future
by one or more of the factors described in this section, particularly in view of the fast pace of technological change in the computing industry.
DESKTOP AND ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE AND SERVICES
The Company’s competitors include many software application vendors, such
as IBM, Oracle, Apple, Sun Microsystems, Corel, Qualcomm, and local application developers in Europe and Asia. IBM and Corel have large installed bases with their spreadsheet and word processor products, respectively, and both have aggressive
pricing strategies. Also, IBM and Apple preinstall certain of their application software products on various models of their PCs, competing directly with Microsoft’s desktop application software. Sun Microsystems’ Star Office is
aggressively priced. Additionally, Web-based application hosting services provide an alternative to PC-based applications such as Microsoft Office.
Microsoft’s PC and server operating system products face substantial competition from a wide variety of companies. Competitors such as IBM, Apple Computer, Sun Microsystems, and others are vertically integrated in both software
development and hardware manufacturing and have developed operating systems that they preinstall on their own computers. Many of these operating system software products are also licensed to third-party OEMs for preinstallation on their computers.
Microsoft’s operating system products compete with UNIX-based operating systems from a wide range of companies, including IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Sun Microsystems, and others. Variants of UNIX run on a wide variety of computer platforms and have
gained increasing acceptance as desktop operating systems. The Linux open source operating system has gained increasing acceptance as well. Several computer manufacturers preinstall Linux on PC servers and many leading software developers have
written applications that run on Linux. Microsoft Windows operating systems also face competition from alternative platforms such as those based on Internet browsing software and Java technology promoted by AOL-Time Warner and Sun
Microsystems.
The Company competes in the business of providing enterprise-wide computing solutions with several competitors who enjoy a larger share of
sales and larger installed bases. Many companies offer operating system software for mainframes and midrange computers, including IBM, HP, and Sun Microsystems. Since legacy business systems are typically support-intensive, these competitors also
offer substantial support services. Software developers that provide competing server applications for PC-based distributed client/server environments include Oracle, IBM, Computer Associates, Sybase, and Informix. There are also several software
vendors who offer connectivity servers. As mentioned above, there are numerous companies and organizations that offer Internet and intranet server software, which compete against the Company’s business systems. Additionally, IBM has a large
installed base of Lotus Notes and cc:Mail, both of which compete with the Company’s collaboration and e-mail products.
The Company’s developer products
compete against offerings from BEA Systems, Borland, IBM, Macromedia, Oracle, Sun Microsystems, Sybase, and other companies.
CONSUMER SOFTWARE, SERVICES, AND DEVICES
Microsoft’s online services network, MSN, faces formidable competition from
AOL-Time Warner, Yahoo!, and a vast array of Web sites and portals that offer content of all types and e-mail, instant messaging, calendaring, chat, and search and shopping services, among other things.
Xbox competes head-to-head against game systems from Nintendo and Sony, both of which have a large established base of game system users. Game developers like Activision, Capcom,
Electronic Arts, Sega, Tecmo, and THQ, to name a few, are both partners and competitors.
Microsoft faces many competitors in the mobile devices space,
including Palm, Symbian, Nokia, and Openwave. The embedded operating system market is highly fragmented with many competitive offerings. Key competitors include Wind River and versions of embeddable Linux from commercial Linux vendors such as Red
Hat, Lineo, and MontaVista.
Part I
Item 1, 2, 3, 4
CONSUMER COMMERCE INVESTMENTS
Microsoft faces many competitors in the online real estate and online automotive service spaces, including Homestore, AOL’s House and Home channel, Autobytel, AOL
autos, and Yahoo! autos.
OTHER
PC input devices face substantial competition from computer manufacturers, since computers are typically sold with a keyboard and mouse, and other manufacturers of these devices. Microsoft Press competes in the retail book and
eLearning markets with publishers that also create content on Microsoft technologies. A few of the retail competitors are Pearson, WROX, Sybex, and Wiley. The major eLearning competitors are Smartforce and NetG.
EMPLOYEES
As of June 30, 2002, the Company
employed approximately 50,500 people on a full-time basis, 34,600 in the United States and 15,900 internationally. Of the total, 20,800 were in product research and development, 23,500 in sales, marketing, and support, 2,200 in manufacturing and
distribution, and 4,000 in finance and administration. Microsoft’s success is highly dependent on its ability to attract and retain qualified employees. Competition for employees is intense in the software industry. To date, the Company
believes it has been successful in its efforts to recruit qualified employees, but there is no assurance that it will continue to be as successful in the future. None of the Company’s employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements.
The Company believes relations with its employees are excellent.
The Company’s corporate offices consist of approximately 8.4 million
square feet of office building space located in King County, Washington, of which 5.7 million square feet of corporate campus space situated on slightly more than 300 acres of land is owned and approximately 2.7 million square feet is leased. The
Company is constructing three buildings with approximately 392,000 square feet of space that will be occupied in the Fall of 2003. To accommodate expansion needs the Company purchased approximately 38 acres, and has an option to purchase
approximately 112 additional acres, of land in Issaquah, Washington, which can accommodate 2.95 million square feet of additional office space. The Company leases many sites domestically totaling approximately 3.0 million square feet of office
building space.
The Company leases many sites internationally totaling approximately 4.1 million square feet, including the Company’s European Operations
Center and localization division which leases a 382,000 square-foot campus in Dublin, Ireland, a 45,000 square-foot disk duplication facility in Humacao, Puerto Rico and a 36,000 square-foot facility in Singapore for the Company’s Asia Pacific
Operations Center. Leased office building space includes the following locations: Tokyo, Japan 343,000 square feet; Unterschleissheim, Germany 253,000 square feet; United Kingdom campus 242,000 square feet; Les Ulis, France 229,000 square feet; and
Beijing, China 115,000 square feet.
The Company’s facilities are fully used for current operations of all segments and suitable additional space is available
to accommodate expansion needs.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 19—Contingencies of the Notes to Financial Statements (Item
8) for information regarding legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of
security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002.
Part I
Item 4
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The executive officers of Microsoft as of July 31, 2002 were as follows:
| Name |
|
Age |
|
Position with the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| William H. Gates, III |
|
46 |
|
Chairman of the Board; Chief Software Architect |
| Steven A. Ballmer |
|
46 |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
| James E. Allchin |
|
50 |
|
Group Vice President, Platforms Group |
| Orlando Ayala |
|
46 |
|
Group Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Marketing, and Services Group |
| Robert J. (Robbie) Bach |
|
40 |
|
Senior Vice President, Games Division |
| Douglas J. Burgum |
|
46 |
|
Senior Vice President, Business Solutions |
| David W. Cole |
|
40 |
|
Senior Vice President, MSN and Personal Services Group |
| John G. Connors |
|
43 |
|
Senior Vice President; Chief Financial Officer |
| Jean-Philippe Courtois |
|
41 |
|
Senior Vice President; President, Microsoft Europe, Middle East, and Africa |
| Jon Stephan DeVaan |
|
41 |
|
Senior Vice President, TV Division |
| Richard P. Emerson |
|
40 |
|
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategy |
| Paul Flessner |
|
43 |
|
Senior Vice President, .NET Enterprise Servers |
| Kevin R. Johnson |
|
41 |
|
Senior Vice President, Microsoft Americas |
| Robert L. Muglia |
|
42 |
|
Senior Vice President, Enterprise Storage Division |
| Craig J. Mundie |
|
53 |
|
Senior Vice President; Chief Technical Officer, Advanced Strategies and Policy |
| Jeffrey S. Raikes |
|
44 |
|
Group Vice President, Productivity and Business Services |
| Richard F. Rashid |
|
50 |
|
Senior Vice President, Research |
| Eric D. Rudder |
|
35 |
|
Senior Vice President, Developer and Platform Evangelism |
| Steven J. Sinofsky |
|
36 |
|
Senior Vice President, Office |
| Bradford L. Smith |
|
43 |
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel |
| Brian Valentine |
|
42 |
|
Senior Vice President, Windows |
| David Vaskevitch |
|
49 |
|
Senior Vice President; Chief Technical Officer, Business Platform |
| Deborah N. Willingham |
|
46 |
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources |
Mr. Gates co-founded Microsoft in 1975 and served as its Chief Executive
Officer from the time the original partnership was incorporated in 1981 until January 2000, when he resigned as Chief Executive Officer and assumed the position of Chief Software Architect. Mr. Gates has served as Chairman of the Board since the
Company’s incorporation.
Mr. Ballmer was named Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company in January 2000. He served as President from July 1998 to
February 2001. Previously, he had served as Executive Vice President, Sales and Support since February 1992. He joined Microsoft in 1980.
Mr. Allchin was named
Group Vice President, Platforms Group in December 1999. He had been Senior Vice President, Platforms since March 1999. He was previously Senior Vice President, Personal and Business Systems since February 1996. Mr. Allchin joined Microsoft in 1990.
Mr. Ayala was named Group Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Marketing, and Services Group in August 2000. He had been Senior Vice President, South Pacific and
Americas since February 1998, and before holding that position, was Vice President of the developing markets of Africa, India, the Mediterranean and Middle East, Latin America, Southeast Asia and the South Pacific. He joined Microsoft in 1991 as
Senior Director of the Latin America Region.
Mr. Bach was named Senior Vice President, Games Division in March 2000. He had been Vice President, Home and Retail
since March 1999. Before holding that position, he had been Vice President, Learning, Entertainment and Productivity since 1996. Mr. Bach joined Microsoft in 1988.
Mr. Burgum joined the Company upon Microsoft’s acquisition of Great Plains Software, Inc. in April 2001. Mr. Burgum became Great Plains’ first outside investor in March 1983. He was named President of Great Plains in 1984
and subsequently named Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Cole was named Senior Vice President, MSN and Personal Services Group in November 2001. Before
holding that position, he had been Senior Vice President, Services Platform Division since August 2000. He had been Senior Vice President, Consumer Services since December 1999 and Vice President, Consumer Windows since March 1999. Previously, he
was Vice President, Web Client and Consumer Experience and Vice President, Internet Client and Collaboration. Mr. Cole joined Microsoft in 1986.
Mr. Connors was
named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in December 1999. He had been Vice President, Enterprise since March 1999. Mr. Connors had been Vice President, Information Technology, and Chief Information Officer since July 1996. He joined
Microsoft in 1989.
Mr. Courtois was named Senior Vice President and President, Microsoft Europe, Middle East, and Africa in July 2000. He had been Vice President,
Customer Marketing since July 1998. Before holding that position, he had been Vice President of Microsoft Europe since 1997 and General Manager for Microsoft France since 1994. Mr. Courtois joined Microsoft in 1984.
Mr. DeVaan was named Senior Vice President, TV Division in December 1999. He had been Senior Vice President, Consumer and Commerce since September 1999. Mr. DeVaan had been Vice
President, Consumer and Commerce since March 1999. He had been Vice President, Desktop Applications since 1995. Mr. DeVaan joined Microsoft in 1985.
Part I
Item 4
Mr. Emerson joined Microsoft in November 2000 as Senior Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategy. Prior
to joining Microsoft, he was Managing Director and co-head of Technology and Telecommunications Advisory Services at international investment bank Lazard Freres & Co. LLC. He spent 12 years in San Francisco and New York with Lazard and Morgan
Stanley, specializing in advising clients in the technology and telecommunications sectors on mergers, acquisitions, and strategic partnerships.
Mr. Flessner was
named Senior Vice President, .NET Enterprise Servers in December 1999. He had been Vice President, Database and Data Access. Since joining the Company, Mr. Flessner’s primary responsibilities have been the development of Microsoft’s
database business. He joined Microsoft in 1994.
Mr. Johnson was named Senior Vice President, Microsoft Americas in February 2002. He had been Senior Vice
President, U.S. Sales, Marketing, and Services since August 2001, and before that, Vice President, U.S. Sales, Marketing and Services. Mr. Johnson was named Vice President, Product Support Services in July 1998. He joined Microsoft in 1992.
Mr. Muglia was named Senior Vice President, Enterprise Storage Division in November 2001. Before holding that position, he had been Group Vice President, Personal
Services Group since August 2000. He had been Group Vice President, Business Productivity since December 1999. He was named Senior Vice President, Business Productivity in March 1999 and was named Senior Vice President, Applications and Tools
in February 1998. He had been Vice President, Server Applications since 1997. He joined Microsoft in 1988.
Mr. Mundie was named Senior Vice President and Chief
Technical Officer, Advanced Strategies and Policy in August 2001. He was named Senior Vice President, Consumer Platforms in February 1996. He joined Microsoft as General Manager, Advanced Consumer Technology in 1992.
Mr. Raikes was named Group Vice President, Productivity and Business Services in August 2000. He had been Group Vice President, Sales and Support since July 1998. Before holding that
position, he had been Group Vice President, Sales and Marketing since July 1996. Mr. Raikes joined Microsoft in 1981.
Mr. Rashid was named Senior Vice President,
Research in May 2000. He had been Vice President, Research since July 1994. He joined Microsoft in 1991.
Mr. Rudder was named Senior Vice President, Developer and
Platform Evangelism in October 2001. He had been Vice President, Technical Strategy. Mr. Rudder joined Microsoft in 1988 and has worked in several areas, including networking, operating systems and developer tools, where he previously served as
General Manager for the Visual Studio development system.
Mr. Sinofsky was named Senior Vice President, Office in December 1999. He had been Vice President, Office
since December 1998. Mr. Sinofsky joined the Office team in 1994, increasing his responsibility with each subsequent release of the desktop suite. He joined Microsoft in 1989.
Mr. Smith was named Senior Vice President and General Counsel in November 2001. He had been Deputy General Counsel for Worldwide Sales and previously was responsible for managing the Company’s European Law and Corporate Affairs
Group, based in Paris. He joined Microsoft in 1993.
Mr. Valentine was named Senior Vice President, Windows in December 1999. He had been Vice President, Business
and Enterprise since March 1999. He had been Vice President, Windows since December 1998. Before managing the Windows group, Mr. Valentine managed the server applications division and had been responsible for the Exchange product unit. He joined
Microsoft in 1987.
Mr. Vaskevitch was named Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer, Business Platform in August 2001. He was named Senior Vice
President, Business Applications in March 2000. He had been Senior Vice President, Developer since December 1999. Before holding that position, he had been Vice President, Distributed Applications Platform. He joined Microsoft in 1986.
Ms. Willingham was named Senior Vice President, Human Resources in February 2001. She had been Vice President, Human Resources since April 2000. Ms. Willingham had been Vice
President, Business and Enterprise Division Marketing and was responsible for Windows operating system client and server marketing strategy and training, as well as for providing centralized marketing services for the Consumer Windows Marketing and
Streaming Media Marketing teams. She joined Microsoft in 1993.
Part II
Item 5, 6
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The Company’s
common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol MSFT. On June 30, 2002, there were 117,730 registered holders of record of the Company’s common stock. The Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock. The
high and low common stock prices per share were as follows:
| Quarter Ended |
|
Sept. 30 |
|
Dec. 31 |
|
Mar. 31 |
|
June 30 |
|
Year |
| |
| Fiscal 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common stock price per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| High |
|
$ |
82.00 |
|
$ |
70.88 |
|
$ |
64.69 |
|
$ |
73.68 |
|
$ |
82.00 |
| Low |
|
|
60.31 |
|
|
41.50 |
|
|
43.38 |
|
|
51.94 |
|
|
41.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Fiscal 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common stock price per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| High |
|
$ |
72.57 |
|
$ |
69.49 |
|
$ |
69.86 |
|
$ |
60.38 |
|
$ |
72.57 |
| Low |
|
|
49.71 |
|
|
51.79 |
|
|
57.99 |
|
|
48.62 |
|
|
48.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
| In millions, except earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
1998 |
|
1999 |
|
2000 |
|
2001(1) |
|
2002(2) |
| |
| Revenue |
|
$ |
15,262 |
|
$ |
19,747 |
|
$ |
22,956 |
|
$ |
25,296 |
|
$ |
28,365 |
| Operating income |
|
|
6,585 |
|
|
10,010 |
|
|
11,006 |
|
|
11,720 |
|
|
11,910 |
| Income before accounting change |
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
9,421 |
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
7,829 |
| Net income |
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
7,785 |
|
|
9,421 |
|
|
7,346 |
|
|
7,829 |
| Diluted earnings per share before accounting change |
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
1.38 |
|
|
1.41 |
| Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
1.42 |
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
1.41 |
| Cash and short-term investments |
|
|
13,927 |
|
|
17,236 |
|
|
23,798 |
|
|
31,600 |
|
|
38,652 |
| Total assets |
|
|
22,357 |
|
|
38,321 |
|
|
51,694 |
|
|
58,830 |
|
|
67,646 |
| Stockholders’ equity |
|
|
16,627 |
|
|
28,438 |
|
|
41,368 |
|
|
47,289 |
|
|
52,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fiscal year 2001 includes an unfavorable cumulative effect of accounting change of $375 million or $0.06 per diluted share, reflecting the adoption of SFAS No. 133, and
$4.80 billion (pre-tax) in impairments of certain investments, primarily cable and telecommunication investments. |
(2) |
|
Fiscal year 2002 includes $4.32 billion (pre-tax) in impairments of certain investments, primarily related to the Company’s AT&T investment and further declines
in the fair values of European cable and telecommunications holdings, and a $1.25 billion (pre-tax) gain on the sale of Expedia, Inc. |
Part II
Item 7
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR 2000, 2001, AND 2002
Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains statements that are forward-looking. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ
materially because of factors discussed in “Issues and Uncertainties.”
REVENUE
The Company’s revenue growth rate was 16% in fiscal 2000, 10% in fiscal 2001, and 12% in fiscal 2002. Revenue growth in fiscal 2002 was led by the addition of Xbox
video game system revenue and the strong penetration of Microsoft Windows XP Professional and Home operating systems. Revenue growth in fiscal 2001 was driven primarily by licensing of Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional, Microsoft SQL Server, and
the other .NET Enterprise Servers. Revenue growth in fiscal 2000 was driven by strong licensing of Microsoft Windows NT Workstation, Windows 2000 Professional, Windows NT Server, Windows 2000 Server, Microsoft Office 2000, and SQL Server.
Microsoft continued to see a mix shift to volume licensing programs. On October 1, 2001, Microsoft launched Licensing 6.0 to simplify and improve its volume
licensing programs, including a simplified approach to software upgrades. One feature of Licensing 6.0 is Software Assurance which gives customers the right to install any new release of products covered in the licensing agreement during the term of
their coverage. The success of Microsoft’s new volume licensing programs will continue to affect the mix of multi-year licensing agreements with a resulting impact on the timing of revenue recognition. In addition, the timing and extent of a
recovery in consumer and corporate spending on PCs and information technology (IT) will be factors affecting revenue growth.
PRODUCT REVENUE
In fiscal 2002, Microsoft had four segments: Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services; Consumer Software,
Services, and Devices; Consumer Commerce Investments; and Other. The revenue figures in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) differ from those reported in the Company’s Segment Information appearing in Note 20 of the Notes
to Financial Statements. The revenue figures in the Segment Information represent amounts reported internally for management reporting, while the revenue figures in the MD&A reflect revenue recognized in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. On July 1, 2002, Microsoft revised its product segments and will begin reporting the new segments in fiscal 2003.
Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services. Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services revenue was $20.40 billion, $22.41 billion, and $24.01 billion in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Desktop and Enterprise
Software and Services includes Desktop Applications; Desktop Platforms; and Enterprise Software and Services.
Desktop Applications revenue was $9.30 billion, $9.54
billion, and $9.60 billion in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Desktop Applications includes revenue from Microsoft Office; Microsoft Project; Visio; client access licenses (CALs) for Windows NT Server and Windows 2000 Server, Exchange, and BackOffice;
Microsoft Great Plains; and bCentral. In fiscal 2002, Office licensing revenue declined during the year due to a strong mix shift to multi-year annuity licensing agreements, which deferred revenue recognition to future years, and a decrease in
consumer purchases in the Asia region, most notably Japan, partially offset by strong OEM licensing. Revenue from client access licenses grew 3% in fiscal 2002 and revenue from Great Plains contributed to the growth in Desktop Applications. In
fiscal 2001, revenue from client access licenses increased 14% reflecting strong licensing growth of Windows NT Server and Windows 2000 Server CALs. Office revenue growth was flat during fiscal 2001. In fiscal 2000, revenue growth from Microsoft
Office integrated suites, including the Premium, Professional, Small Business, and Standard Editions was very solid.
Desktop Platforms revenue was $7.02 billion,
$8.04 billion, and $9.30 billion in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Desktop Platforms includes revenue from Windows XP Professional and Home, Windows 2000 Professional, Windows NT Workstation, Windows Me, Windows 98, and other desktop operating systems. In
fiscal 2002, the growth in Desktop Platforms revenue reflected strong multi-year licensing revenue growth and a continued mix shift to the higher priced Windows 2000 and Windows XP Professional operating system through OEMs, despite a decline in
reported OEM unit shipments. Fiscal 2001 revenue growth reflected the strong adoption of Windows 2000 Professional, partially offset by flat revenue growth from Windows Me and Windows 98 operating systems, reflecting the slowdown in consumer
PC shipments and a higher mix of Windows 2000 Professional and Windows NT Workstation. In fiscal 2000, Desktop Platforms revenue growth was modest due to soft demand for business PCs during most of the year; a slowdown in shipments in anticipation
of the post mid-year availability of Windows 2000 operating systems; and, as expected, a longer business migration cycle for the newest Windows operating system offerings. The rate of growth in PC shipments and the mix of Windows 2000 and Windows XP
Professional as a percentage of all 32-bit operating systems will continue to impact revenue growth in the future.
Enterprise Software and Services revenue was
$4.08 billion, $4.83 billion, and $5.11 billion in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Enterprise Software and Services includes Server Platforms, Server Applications, Developer Tools and Services, and Enterprise Services. In fiscal 2002, Server Applications,
including Microsoft SQL Server and .NET Enterprise Servers, increased 10% compared to fiscal 2001. Server Platform revenue, which includes Windows 2000 Server and Windows NT Server operating systems, increased 10% versus fiscal 2001 driven by a
modest overall increase in Windows-based server shipments and increased deployment of Windows 2000 Server. Enterprise Services revenue, representing consulting and product support services, was up 17% compared to fiscal 2001, while revenue from
Developer Tools and Services was down 19% from fiscal 2001. In fiscal 2001, Server Applications revenue increased 31% versus the prior year as a result of
Part II
Item 7
the continued adoption of Microsoft’s .NET Enterprise Server offerings. Enterprise Services revenue in fiscal 2001, was up 34% compared to fiscal 2000 and Server Platforms increased 10%
while revenue from Developer Tools and Services was flat. In fiscal 2000, Server Platforms revenue growth was particularly strong led by increased adoption by customers of Windows NT Server and Windows 2000 Server. Revenue from Server Applications
grew strongly in fiscal 2000, largely due to the strong success of SQL Server 7.0, while Software Developer Tools and Services revenue declined, due to increased suite licensing versus stand-alone licenses, and the lack of a release upgrade of the
Visual Studio development system.
Consumer Software, Services, and Devices. Consumer Software, Services, and Devices
revenue was $1.63 billion, $1.95 billion, and $3.59 billion in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Consumer Software, Services, and Devices includes the Xbox video game system; MSN Internet access; MSN network service; PC and online games; learning and
productivity software; mobility; and embedded systems. The majority of the revenue growth from fiscal 2001 stemmed from sales of the Xbox video game system released in fiscal 2002. MSN Internet access revenue increased as a result of both a higher
subscriber base and higher average revenue per subscriber due to a reduction in promotional subscriber programs. Revenue from MSN network services increased despite a declining Internet advertising market. Revenue from embedded systems in fiscal
2002 grew nicely, however learning and productivity software revenue and PC and online games declined compared to fiscal 2001. In fiscal 2001, revenue from MSN network services grew strongly despite a decline in the online advertising market. MSN
Internet access revenue also grew solidly from fiscal 2000 as a result of an increased subscriber base, partially offset by a decline in the average revenue per subscriber due to a larger mix of subscribers contracted under rebate programs. Revenue
from embedded systems grew strongly from the prior year, while learning and productivity software revenue and PC and online games revenue declined, reflecting softness in the overall consumer market. In fiscal 2000, online revenue growth was very
strong and reflected higher subscriber totals, offset by lower net prices for Internet access subscriptions compared to the prior year. Additionally, strong sales of entertainment software in fiscal 2000 produced robust revenue growth in PC and
online games.
Consumer Commerce Investments. Consumer Commerce Investments revenue was $182 million, $299 million,
and $242 million in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Consumer Commerce Investments include Expedia, Inc., the HomeAdvisor online real estate service, and the CarPoint online automotive service. The decline in revenue compared to fiscal 2001 reflects the sale
of Microsoft’s majority ownership of Expedia, Inc. to USA Networks, Inc. on February 4, 2002. Acquisitions of Travelscape.com and VacationSpot.com by Expedia, Inc., and increased product offerings from Expedia led to the strong revenue growth
in fiscal 2001. The increased overall reach of all properties led to the strong revenue growth in fiscal 2000.
Other. Other revenue, which primarily includes Hardware and Microsoft Press, was $754 million, $630 million, and $530 million in 2000, 2001, and 2002. In fiscal 2002, continued declines in the IT book
and consumer market led to a decline in Microsoft Press and Hardware sales. Lower sales of gaming devices and other hardware peripherals as a result of weakness in the consumer market caused the decline in revenue in fiscal 2001. Continued success
of the Company’s new hardware device offerings led to revenue growth in fiscal 2000.
DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS
Microsoft distributes its products primarily through the following channels: OEM; volume licensing; online services and products; and distributors and
retailers. OEM channel revenue represents license fees from original equipment manufacturers who preinstall Microsoft products, primarily on PCs. Microsoft has three major geographic sales and marketing regions: the South Pacific and Americas
Region; the Europe, Middle East, and Africa Region; and the Asia Region. Sales of volume licenses and packaged software products via these channels are primarily to distributors and resellers.
OEM revenue was $7.01 billion in 2000, $7.86 billion in 2001, and $9.00 billion in 2002. In fiscal 2002, reported licenses declined compared to fiscal 2001. However, a strong increase in the mix of the higher
priced Windows 2000 and Windows XP Professional licenses, and healthy growth in direct and system builder OEMs licenses, led to higher average revenue per license and contributed to the overall OEM revenue growth over fiscal 2001. In fiscal 2001,
while total licenses were also impacted by a slowdown in PC shipments, the mix of the higher priced Windows 2000 Professional and Windows NT Workstation increased substantially resulting in higher average revenue per license. A relatively low growth
rate in fiscal 2000 was due to lower business PC shipment growth combined with post mid-year availability of Windows 2000 Professional. Average earned revenue per license also declined in fiscal 2000 compared to the prior year, due in part to a mix
shift to the lower-priced Windows 98 operating system reflecting the softness in demand for business PCs and lower prices on operating systems licensed through certain OEM channel sectors.
South Pacific and Americas Region revenue was $8.33 billion, $9.52 billion, and $11.41 billion in 2000, 2001, and 2002. In fiscal 2002, the majority of the revenue growth was driven by sales of the Xbox video
game system released during the year, as well as strong Windows XP Professional licensing, MSN subscription revenue, and revenue from Microsoft Great Plains. In fiscal 2001, revenue growth was led by strong licensing of Windows 2000 Professional and
the family of .NET Enterprise Servers, particularly SQL Server 2000 and Exchange 2000 Server. Revenue from Enterprise services and MSN subscription and services also grew strongly in fiscal 2001. In fiscal 2000, Office 2000 integrated suites,
Windows 2000 Server, online revenue, and SQL Server sales were the primary drivers of the revenue growth. Strong retail sales of hardware devices and consumer software also contributed to the growth over the prior year.
Europe, Middle East, and Africa Region revenue was $5.02 billion, $4.86 billion, and $5.13 billion in 2000, 2001, and 2002. In fiscal 2002, the majority of the growth was a result of
strong multi-year licensing revenue of Windows XP Home and Professional operating systems and Enterprise Software, as well as the addition of Xbox video game system revenue in the second half of the year. In fiscal 2001, weakening local currencies
negatively impacted translated revenue compared to the prior year, while revenue from Windows 2000 Professional and the .NET Enterprise Server family of products was very healthy. In fiscal 2000, retail sales of Windows operating systems and
Part II
Item 7
Office licensing produced moderate growth in the region. Growth from SQL Server licensing, new hardware device offerings, and entertainment software was especially strong.
Asia Region revenue was $2.60 billion in 2000, $3.06 billion in 2001, and $2.83 billion in 2002. In fiscal 2002, Asia region revenue declined most notably due to lower consumer PC
shipments, which hampered revenue from localized versions of Microsoft Office 2000 and Microsoft Office XP, especially the Office Personal Edition. Xbox video game system sales partially offset the decline in Office revenue. In fiscal 2001, the
region’s growth rate reflected strong revenue from localized versions of Microsoft Office 2000 and Microsoft Office XP, especially the Office Personal Edition. This growth was also attributable to Windows 2000 Professional and .NET Server
applications licensing. In fiscal 2000, the region’s growth rate reflected strong performance resulting from improved local economic conditions. Revenue growth was also influenced by robust growth of localized versions of Microsoft Office 2000,
especially the Office Personal Edition sold in Japan, Windows platform and server licensing, and strong adoption of SQL Server.
The Company’s operating
results are affected by foreign exchange rates. Approximately 30%, 27%, and 25% of the Company’s revenue was collected in foreign currencies during 2000, 2001, and 2002. Since a portion of local currency revenue is hedged and much of the
Company’s international manufacturing costs and operating expenses are also incurred in local currencies, the impact of exchange rates is partially mitigated.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue as a percent of
revenue was 13.1% in 2000, 13.7% in 2001, and 18.3% in 2002. Cost of revenue in fiscal 2002 increased primarily due to costs related to Xbox. In fiscal 2001, higher support and service costs associated with the MSN Internet access and MSN network
services were partially offset by the lower relative costs associated with organizational licensing and the drop in the mix of packaged product versus the prior year. Cost of revenue in fiscal 2000 reflected lower costs associated with WebTV
Networks’ operations, partially offset by the growth in hardware peripherals costs.
Research and
Development. The discontinuation of goodwill amortization in fiscal 2002 in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, offset the growth in
headcount and development costs. In fiscal 2001, the increase in R&D expense was the result of higher headcount-related costs and investments in new product initiatives. The increase in fiscal 2000 was driven primarily by higher
headcount-related costs. Prospectively, increased headcount and increased spending in Server Platforms, Home & Entertainment, Business Solutions and CE are currently expected to be significant factors affecting future research and development
expense growth.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue was 18.0% in 2000, 19.3%
in 2001, and 19.1% in 2002. In fiscal 2002, sales and marketing expense as a percentage of revenue decreased due to lower relative MSN customer acquisition marketing and the large relative increase associated with the onset of Xbox video game system
revenue. In fiscal 2001, sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenue increased due to higher relative headcount-related costs, higher marketing and sales expenses associated with MSN, the Microsoft Agility advertising campaign, and other
new sales initiatives. In fiscal 2000, sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenue increased due to higher relative marketing costs associated with new product releases and online marketing. Microsoft expects that it will increase
spending on Information Worker, Server Platforms, and Business Solutions sales forces and Windows Client, MSN and Home & Entertainment marketing.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses in fiscal 2002 increased due to a charge of approximately $660 million for estimated expenses related to the Company’s consumer class
action lawsuits and higher legal fees. In fiscal 2001, general and administrative costs decreased due to a charge related to the settlement of the lawsuit with Caldera, Inc. recorded in fiscal 2000. Excluding this charge in fiscal 2000, general and
administrative expenses in fiscal 2001 increased from the prior year due to higher headcount-related costs and legal fees. For fiscal 2000, besides the settlement of the lawsuit, general and administrative expenses also reflected increased legal
fees and certain employee stock option-related expenses.
NON-OPERATING ITEMS, INVESTMENT INCOME/(LOSS), AND INCOME TAXES
Losses on equity investees and other consists of Microsoft’s share of income or loss from investments accounted for using the equity
method, and income or loss attributable to minority interests. The decrease in losses on equity investees and other in fiscal 2002 was attributed to the divestiture of certain equity investments in fiscal 2002. The increase in losses on equity
investees and other in fiscal 2001 reflects an increase in the number of such investments during the year. In fiscal 2000 losses on equity investees and other decreased reflecting smaller losses from the MSNBC entities.
Part II
Item 7
The Company recorded net investment income/(loss) in each year as follows:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Dividends |
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
| Interest |
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
| Net recognized gains/(losses) on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net gains on the sales of investments |
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
| Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(4,804 |
) |
|
|
(4,323 |
) |
| Net unrealized losses attributable to derivative instruments |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net recognized gains/(losses) on investments |
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
(2,221 |
) |
|
|
(2,424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment income/(loss) |
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
$ |
(305 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2002, other-than-temporary impairments primarily related to the
Company’s investment in AT&T and other cable and telecommunication investments. Net gains on the sales of investments included a $1.25 billion gain on the sale of the Company’s share of Expedia. Interest and dividend income decreased
$66 million from fiscal 2001 as a result of lower interest rates and dividend income.
In fiscal 2001, other-than-temporary impairments primarily related to cable
and telecommunication investments. Net gains from the sales of investments in fiscal 2001 included a gain from Microsoft’s investment in Titus Communications (which was merged with Jupiter Telecommunications) and the closing of the sale of
Transpoint to CheckFree Holdings Corp. Interest and dividend income increased $591 million from fiscal 2000, reflecting a larger investment portfolio. In fiscal year 2000, investment income increased primarily as a result of a larger investment
portfolio generated by cash from operations coupled with realized gains from the sale of securities.
At June 30, 2002, unrealized losses on Equity and Other
Investments of $623 million were deemed to be temporary in nature. The following, among other factors, could result in some investments being deemed other-than-temporarily impaired in future periods: changes in the duration and extent to which the
fair value is less than cost; the financial health of and business outlook for the investee, including industry and sector performance, changes in technology, and operational and financing cash flow factors; and the Company’s intent and ability
to hold the investment.
In connection with the definitive agreement to combine AT&T Broadband with Comcast in a new company to be called AT&T Comcast
Corporation, Microsoft has agreed to exchange its AT&T 5% convertible preferred debt securities for approximately 115 million shares of AT&T Comcast Corporation. It is expected that the transaction will close by December 31, 2002. While it
is possible that Microsoft could incur a loss on this exchange transaction up to the carrying value of the AT&T debt securities, management believes that the ultimate loss, if any, will be significantly less. As management is unable to predict
whether there will be a gain or loss on the exchange, no loss has been recorded related to this contingent exchange transaction as of June 30, 2002.
The
Company’s effective tax rate for fiscal 2002 was 32%. The effective tax rate for fiscal 2001 and fiscal 2000 was 33% and 34%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is due primarily to lower taxes on foreign earnings.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Effective July 1, 2001, Microsoft adopted SFAS 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 141 requires business combinations to be accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. It also specifies the types of acquired intangible assets that are required to be recognized and reported separate from goodwill. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and certain intangibles no longer be amortized, but instead tested for
impairment at least annually. There was no impairment of goodwill upon adoption of SFAS 142. Goodwill amortization (on a pre-tax basis) was $234 million in fiscal 2000 and $311 million in fiscal 2001.
Effective July 1, 2000, Microsoft adopted SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The adoption of SFAS 133 resulted in a cumulative pre-tax reduction to income of $560 million ($375 million after-tax) and a cumulative pre-tax reduction to other
comprehensive income (OCI) of $112 million ($75 million after-tax). The reduction to income was mostly attributable to a loss of approximately $300 million reclassified from OCI for the time value of options and a loss of approximately $250 million
reclassified from OCI for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments. The reduction to OCI was mostly attributable to losses of approximately $670 million on cash flow hedges offset by the reclassifications out of OCI of the approximately
$300 million loss for the time value of options and the approximately $250 million loss for derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Company’s cash and short-term investment portfolio totaled $38.65 billion at June 30,
2002. The portfolio consists primarily of fixed-income securities, diversified among industries and individual issuers. Microsoft’s investments are generally liquid and investment grade. The portfolio is invested predominantly in U.S. dollar
denominated securities, but also includes foreign currency positions in order to diversify financial risk. The portfolio is primarily invested in short-term securities to minimize interest rate risk and facilitate rapid deployment for immediate cash
needs.
Part II
Item 7
Cash flow from operations was $14.51 billion for fiscal 2002, an increase of $1.09 billion from fiscal 2001. The
increase reflects strong growth in unearned revenue. Cash used for financing was $4.57 billion in fiscal 2002, a decrease of $1.01 billion from the prior year. The decrease reflects the repurchase of put warrants in the prior year. The Company
repurchased 122.8 million shares of common stock under its share repurchase program in fiscal 2002, compared to 89.0 million shares repurchased in the prior year. In addition, 5.1 million shares of common stock were acquired in fiscal 2002 under a
structured stock repurchase transaction. The Company entered into the structured stock repurchase transaction in fiscal 2001, giving it the right to acquire 5.1 million of its shares in exchange for an up-front net payment of $264 million. Cash used
for investing was $10.85 billion in fiscal 2002, an increase of $2.11 billion from fiscal 2001.
Cash flow from operations was $13.42 billion in fiscal 2001, an
increase of $2.00 billion from the prior year. The increase was primarily attributable to the growth in revenue and other changes in working capital, partially offset by the decrease in the stock option income tax benefit, reflecting decreased stock
option exercises by employees. Cash used for financing was $5.59 billion in fiscal 2001, an increase of $3.39 billion from the prior year. The increase primarily reflects the repurchase of put warrants in fiscal 2001, compared to the sale of put
warrants in the prior fiscal year, as well as an increase in common stock repurchased. All outstanding put warrants were either retired or exercised during fiscal 2001. During fiscal 2001, the Company repurchased 89.0 million shares. Cash used for
investing was $8.73 billion in fiscal 2001, a decrease of $658 million from the prior year. In fiscal 2000, cash flow from operations was $11.43 billion, a decrease of $720 million from the prior year, reflecting working capital changes partially
offset by the increase in the stock option income tax benefit. Cash used for financing was $2.19 billion in fiscal 2000, an increase of $1.33 billion from the prior year, reflecting an increase in common stock repurchased versus the prior year.
During fiscal 2000, the Company repurchased 55.2 million shares. Cash used for investing was $9.39 billion in fiscal 2000, a decrease of $808 million from the prior year.
Microsoft has no material long-term debt. Stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2002 was $52.18 billion. Microsoft will continue to invest in sales, marketing, and product support infrastructure. Additionally, research and
development activities will include investments in existing and advanced areas of technology, including using cash to acquire technology. Additions to property and equipment will continue, including new facilities and computer systems for R&D,
sales and marketing, support, and administrative staff. Commitments for constructing new buildings were $111 million on June 30, 2002. The Company has not engaged in any transactions or arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other persons that
are reasonably likely to affect materially liquidity or the availability of or requirements for capital resources. Since fiscal 1990, Microsoft has repurchased 982 million common shares while 2.23 billion shares were issued under the Company’s
employee stock option and purchase plans. The Company’s convertible preferred stock matured on December 15, 1999. Each preferred share was converted into 1.1273 common shares.
Management believes existing cash and short-term investments together with funds generated from operations should be sufficient to meet operating requirements. The Company’s cash and short-term investments are available
for strategic investments, mergers and acquisitions, other potential large-scale needs and to fund the share repurchase program. Microsoft has not paid cash dividends on its common stock.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 11, 2002, Microsoft acquired Navision a/s as a result
of the successful close of a tender offer. Microsoft purchased Navision’s shares for approximately $1.45 billion in stock and cash. Navision is a provider of integrated business software solutions for small and medium-sized companies.
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Microsoft’s financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. Critical accounting policies for Microsoft include
revenue recognition, impairment of investment securities, accounting for research and development costs, accounting for legal contingencies, and accounting for income taxes.
Microsoft accounts for the licensing of software in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. The application of SOP 97-2
requires judgment, including whether a software arrangement includes multiple elements, and if so, whether vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value exists for those elements. End users receive certain elements of the Company’s
products over a period of time. These elements include browser technologies updates and technical support, the fair value of which is recognized over the product’s estimated life cycle. Changes to the elements in a software arrangement, the
ability to identify VSOE for those elements, the fair value of the respective elements, and changes to a product’s estimated life cycle could materially impact the amount of earned and unearned revenue. Judgment is also required to assess
whether future releases of certain software represent new products or upgrades and enhancements to existing products.
SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 59, Accounting for Noncurrent Marketable Equity Securities, provide guidance on determining when an investment is
other-than-temporarily impaired, which also requires judgment. In making this judgment, Microsoft evaluates, among other factors, the duration and extent to which the fair value of an investment is less than its cost; the financial health of and
business outlook for the investee, including factors such as industry and sector performance, changes in technology, and operational and financing cash flow; and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the investment.
Microsoft accounts for research and development costs in accordance with several accounting pronouncements, including SFAS 2, Accounting for Research and Development Costs,
and SFAS 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Other-
Part II
Item 7
wise Marketed. SFAS 86 specifies that costs incurred internally in creating a computer software product should be charged to expense when incurred as research and development until
technological feasibility has been established for the product. Once technological feasibility is established, all software costs should be capitalized until the product is available for general release to customers. Judgment is required in
determining when the technological feasibility of a product is established. Microsoft has determined that technological feasibility for its products is reached shortly before the products are released to manufacturing. Costs incurred after
technological feasibility is established are not material, and accordingly, the Company expenses all research and development costs when incurred.
Microsoft is
subject to various legal proceedings and claims, the outcomes of which are subject to significant uncertainty. SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies, requires that an estimated loss from a loss contingency should be accrued by a charge to
income if it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Disclosure of a contingency is required if there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss has
been incurred. The Company evaluates, among other factors, the degree of probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. Changes in these factors could materially impact the Company’s
financial position or its results of operations.
SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, establishes financial accounting and reporting standards for the
effect of income taxes. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the
actual outcome of these future tax consequences could materially impact the Company’s financial position or its results of operations.
ISSUES AND UNCERTAINTIES
The following issues and uncertainties, among others, should be considered in evaluating the
Company’s financial outlook.
Challenges to the Company’s Business Model. Since its inception, the
Company’s business model has been based upon customers agreeing to pay a fee to license software developed and distributed by Microsoft. Under this commercial software development (“CSD”) model, software developers bear the costs of
converting original ideas into software products through investments in research and development, offsetting these costs with the revenues received from the distribution of their products. The Company believes that the CSD model has had substantial
benefits for users of software, allowing them to rely on the expertise of the Company and other software developers that have powerful incentives to develop innovative software that is useful, reliable and compatible with other software and
hardware. In recent years, there has been a growing challenge to the CSD model, often referred to as the Open Source movement. Under the Open Source model, software is produced by global “communities” of programmers, and the resulting
software and the intellectual property contained therein is licensed to end users at little or no cost. The Company believes that there are significant problems with the Open Source model, the principal drawback being that no single entity is
responsible for the Open Source software, and thus users have no recourse if a product does not work properly or at all. Further, without the market incentives associated with the CSD model, the Company believes that the vigorous innovation and
growth of the software industry over the last 25 years would not have occurred. Nonetheless, the popularization of the Open Source movement continues to pose a significant challenge to the Company’s business model, including recent efforts by
proponents of the Open Source model to convince governments worldwide to mandate the use of Open Source software in their purchase and deployment of software products. To the extent the Open Source model gains increasing market acceptance, sales of
the Company’s products may decline, the Company may have to reduce the prices it charges for its products, and revenues and operating margins may consequently decline.
New Products and Services. The Company has made significant investments in research and development for new products, services and technologies, including Microsoft .NET, Xbox,
business applications, MSN, mobile and wireless technologies, and television. Significant revenue from these investments may not be achieved for a number of years, if at all. Moreover, these products and services may never be profitable, and even if
they are profitable, operating margins for these businesses are not expected to be as high as the margins historically experienced in our Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services businesses.
Declines in Demand for Software. If overall market demand for PCs, servers and other computing devices declines significantly, and consumer and corporate spending for
such products declines, Microsoft’s revenue growth will be adversely affected. Additionally, the Company’s revenues would be unfavorably impacted if customers reduce their purchases of new software products or upgrades to existing products
if such new offerings are not perceived to add significant new functionality or other value to prospective purchasers.
Product Development
Schedule. The development of software products is a complex and time-consuming process. New products and enhancements to existing products can require long development and testing periods. Significant delays in new product
releases or significant problems in creating new products could negatively impact the Company’s revenues.
International
Operations. Microsoft develops and sells products throughout the world. The prices of the Company’s products in countries outside of the United States are generally higher than the Company’s prices in the United
States because of the cost incurred in localizing software for non-U.S. markets. The costs of producing and selling the Company’s products in these countries also are higher. Pressure to globalize Microsoft’s pricing structure might
require that the Company reduce the sales price of its software in other countries, even though the costs of the software continue to be higher than in the United States. Unfavorable changes in trade protection laws, policies and measures, and other
regulatory requirements affecting trade and investment; unexpected changes in regulatory requirements for software; social, political, labor, or economic conditions in a specific country or region, including foreign exchange rates; difficulties in
staffing and managing foreign operations; and potential adverse foreign tax consequences, among other factors, could also have a negative effect on the Company’s business and results of operations outside of the United States.
Part II
Item 7
Intellectual Property Rights. Microsoft diligently defends its
intellectual property rights, but unlicensed copying and use of software represents a loss of revenue to the Company. While this adversely affects U.S. revenue, revenue loss is even more significant outside the United States, particularly in
countries where laws are less protective of intellectual property rights. Throughout the world, Microsoft actively educates consumers on the benefits of licensing genuine products and educates lawmakers on the advantages of a business climate where
intellectual property rights are protected. However, continued efforts may not affect revenue positively and further deterioration in compliance with existing legal protections or reductions in the legal protection for intellectual property rights
of software developers could adversely affect revenue.
Taxation of Extraterritorial Income. In August 2001, a World
Trade Organization (“WTO”) dispute panel determined that the extraterritorial tax (“ETI”) provisions of the FSC Repeal and Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 constitute an export subsidy prohibited by the WTO Agreement
on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreement. The U.S. government appealed the panel’s decision and lost its appeal. On January 29, 2002, the WTO Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Appellate Body report. President Bush has stated the
U.S. will bring its tax laws into compliance with the WTO ruling, but the Administration and Congress have not decided on a solution for this issue. In July 2002, Representative Bill Thomas, Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, introduced
the American Competitiveness and Corporate Accountability Act of 2002. If enacted, that bill would repeal the ETI regime and introduce broad-based international reform. The proposed reforms would not materially affect the Company. On August 30,
2002, a WTO arbitration panel determined that the European Union may impose up to $4.04 billion per year in countermeasures if the U.S. rules are not brought into compliance. The WTO decision does not repeal the ETI tax benefit and it does not
require the European Union to impose trade sanctions, so it is not possible to predict what impact the WTO decision will have on future results pending final resolution of these matters. If the ETI exclusion is repealed and replacement legislation
is not enacted, the loss of tax benefit to the Company could be significant.
Litigation. As discussed in Note 19—Contingencies of the Notes to
Financial Statements, the Company is subject to a variety of claims and lawsuits. While the Company believes that none of the litigation matters in which the Company is currently involved will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s
financial position or results of operations, it is possible that one or more of these matters could be resolved in a manner that would ultimately have a material adverse impact on the business of the Company, and could negatively impact its revenues
and operating margins.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to foreign
currency, interest rate, and equity price risks. A portion of these risks is hedged, but fluctuations could impact the Company’s results of operations and financial position. The Company hedges the exposure of accounts receivable and a portion
of anticipated revenue to foreign currency fluctuations, primarily with option contracts. The Company monitors its foreign currency exposures daily to maximize the overall effectiveness of its foreign currency hedge positions. Principal currencies
hedged include the Euro, Japanese yen, British pound, and Canadian dollar. Fixed income securities are subject to interest rate risk. The portfolio is diversified and consists primarily of investment grade securities to minimize credit risk. The
Company routinely uses options to hedge its exposure to interest rate risk in the event of a catastrophic increase in interest rates. Many securities held in the Company’s equity and other investments portfolio are subject to price risk. The
Company uses options to hedge its price risk on certain highly volatile equity securities.
The Company uses a value-at-risk (VAR) model to estimate and quantify
its market risks. VAR is the expected loss, for a given confidence level, in fair value of the Company’s portfolio due to adverse market movements over a defined time horizon. The VAR model is not intended to represent actual losses in fair
value, but is used as a risk estimation and management tool. The model used for currencies and equities is geometric Brownian motion, which allow incorporation of optionality of these exposures. For interest rates, the mean reverting geometric
Brownian motion is used to reflect the principle that fixed-income securities prices over time revert to maturity value.
Value-at-risk is calculated by, first,
simulating 10,000 market price paths over 20 days for equities, interest rates and foreign exchange rates, taking into account historical correlations among the different rates and prices. Each resulting unique set of equities prices, interest
rates, and foreign exchange rates is applied to substantially all individual holdings to re-price each holding. The 250th worst performance (out of 10,000) represents the value-at-risk over 20 days at the 97.5th percentile.
Several risk factors are not captured in the model, including liquidity risk, operational risk, credit risk, and legal risk.
A substantial amount of the
Company’s equity portfolio is held for strategic purposes. The Company attempts to hedge the value of these securities through the use of derivative contracts such as collars. The Company has incurred substantial impairment charges related to
certain of these securities in fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001. Such impairment charges have been incurred primarily for strategic equity holdings that the Company has not been able to hedge. The VAR amounts disclosed below are not necessarily
reflective of potential accounting losses, as they are used as a risk management tool and reflect an estimate of potential reductions in fair value of the Company’s portfolio. Losses in fair value over a 20-day holding period can exceed the
reported VAR by significant amounts and can also accumulate over a longer time horizon than the 20-day holding period used in the VAR analysis.
The VAR numbers are
shown separately for interest rate, currency, and equity risks. These VAR numbers include the underlying portfolio positions and related hedges. Historical data is used to estimate VAR. Given reliance on historical data, VAR is most effective in
estimating risk exposures in markets in which there are no fundamental changes or shifts in market conditions. An inherent limitation in VAR is that the distribution of past changes in market risk factors may not produce accurate predictions of
future market risk.
Part II
Item 7A, 8
The following table sets forth the VAR calculations for substantially all of the Company’s positions:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
As of June 30, |
|
|
|
Year ended June 30, 2002 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Risk Categories |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
High |
|
Low |
| |
| Interest rates |
|
$ |
472 |
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
|
$ |
435 |
|
$ |
535 |
|
$ |
333 |
| Currency rates |
|
|
310 |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
310 |
|
|
58 |
| Equity prices |
|
|
602 |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
757 |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total VAR for the combined risk categories is $908 million at June 30, 2002 and $759 million at
June 30, 2001. The total VAR is 34% less at June 30, 2002 and 19% less at June, 30 2001 than the sum of the separate risk categories for each of those years in the above table, due to the diversification benefit of the combination of risks. The
reasons for the change in risk in portfolios include: larger investment portfolio size, higher foreign exchange exposure due to stronger non-U.S. currencies, and asset allocation shifts.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INCOME STATEMENTS
| In millions, except earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Revenue |
|
$ |
22,956 |
|
|
$ |
25,296 |
|
|
$ |
28,365 |
|
| Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cost of revenue |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
5,191 |
|
| Research and development |
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
| Sales and marketing |
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
4,885 |
|
|
|
5,407 |
|
| General and administrative |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total operating expenses |
|
|
11,950 |
|
|
|
13,576 |
|
|
|
16,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Operating income |
|
|
11,006 |
|
|
|
11,720 |
|
|
|
11,910 |
|
| Losses on equity investees and other |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
| Investment income/(loss) |
|
|
3,326 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Income before income taxes |
|
|
14,275 |
|
|
|
11,525 |
|
|
|
11,513 |
|
| Provision for income taxes |
|
|
4,854 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Income before accounting change |
|
|
9,421 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
7,829 |
|
| Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of income taxes of $185) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income |
|
$ |
9,421 |
|
|
$ |
7,346 |
|
|
$ |
7,829 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Before accounting change |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
| Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Before accounting change |
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
| Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Basic |
|
|
5,189 |
|
|
|
5,341 |
|
|
|
5,406 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diluted |
|
|
5,536 |
|
|
|
5,574 |
|
|
|
5,553 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
Part II
Item 8
BALANCE SHEETS
| In millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
| |
| Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
3,922 |
|
$ |
3,016 |
| Short-term investments |
|
|
27,678 |
|
|
35,636 |
|
|
|
|
| Total cash and short-term investments |
|
|
31,600 |
|
|
38,652 |
| Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
5,129 |
| Inventories |
|
|
83 |
|
|
673 |
| Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
2,112 |
| Other |
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
|
| Total current assets |
|
|
39,210 |
|
|
48,576 |
| Property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
2,268 |
| Equity and other investments |
|
|
14,361 |
|
|
14,191 |
| Goodwill |
|
|
1,511 |
|
|
1,426 |
| Intangible assets, net |
|
|
401 |
|
|
243 |
| Other long-term assets |
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
|
| Total assets |
|
$ |
58,830 |
|
$ |
67,646 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
$ |
1,208 |
| Accrued compensation |
|
|
742 |
|
|
1,145 |
| Income taxes |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
2,022 |
| Short-term unearned revenue |
|
|
4,395 |
|
|
5,920 |
| Other |
|
|
1,461 |
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
|
| Total current liabilities |
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
12,744 |
| Long-term unearned revenue |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
1,823 |
| Deferred income taxes |
|
|
409 |
|
|
398 |
| Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
659 |
|
|
501 |
| Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common stock and paid-in capital—shares authorized 12,000;
Shares issued and outstanding 5,383 and 5,359
|
|
|
28,390 |
|
|
31,647 |
| Retained earnings, including accumulated other comprehensive income of $587 and $583 |
|
|
18,899 |
|
|
20,533 |
|
|
|
|
| Total stockholders’ equity |
|
|
47,289 |
|
|
52,180 |
|
|
|
|
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
$ |
58,830 |
|
$ |
67,646 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
Part II
Item 8
CASH FLOWS STATEMENTS
| In millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income |
|
$ |
9,421 |
|
|
$ |
7,346 |
|
|
$ |
7,829 |
|
| Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
– |
|
| Depreciation, amortization, and other noncash items |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
| Net recognized (gains)/losses on investments |
|
|
(1,732 |
) |
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
|
2,424 |
|
| Stock option income tax benefits |
|
|
5,535 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
| Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
| Unearned revenue |
|
|
6,177 |
|
|
|
6,970 |
|
|
|
11,152 |
|
| Recognition of unearned revenue |
|
|
(5,600 |
) |
|
|
(6,369 |
) |
|
|
(8,929 |
) |
| Accounts receivable |
|
|
(944 |
) |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(1,623 |
) |
| Other current assets |
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
(264 |
) |
| Other long-term assets |
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
| Other current liabilities |
|
|
(992 |
) |
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
| Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash from operations |
|
|
11,426 |
|
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
14,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common stock issued |
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
1,497 |
|
| Common stock repurchased |
|
|
(4,896 |
) |
|
|
(6,074 |
) |
|
|
(6,069 |
) |
| Sales/(repurchases) of put warrants |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
| Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
| Other, net |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash used for financing |
|
|
(2,192 |
) |
|
|
(5,586 |
) |
|
|
(4,572 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Investing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
|
(1,103 |
) |
|
|
(770 |
) |
| Purchases of investments |
|
|
(42,290 |
) |
|
|
(66,346 |
) |
|
|
(89,386 |
) |
| Maturities of investments |
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
5,867 |
|
|
|
8.654 |
|
| Sales of investments |
|
|
29,752 |
|
|
|
52,848 |
|
|
|
70,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash used for investing |
|
|
(9,392 |
) |
|
|
(8,734 |
) |
|
|
(10,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net change in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
(908 |
) |
| Effect of exchange rates on cash and equivalents |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
| Cash and equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
|
4,846 |
|
|
|
3,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash and equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
4,846 |
|
|
$ |
3,922 |
|
|
$ |
3,016 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
Part II
Item 8
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY STATEMENTS
| In millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Convertible preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
| Conversion of preferred to common stock |
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, end of year |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common stock and paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
13,844 |
|
|
|
23,195 |
|
|
|
28,390 |
|
| Common stock issued |
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
5,154 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
| Common stock repurchased |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(676 |
) |
| Sales/(repurchases) of put warrants |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
| Stock option income tax benefits |
|
|
5,535 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
| Other, net |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, end of year |
|
|
23,195 |
|
|
|
28,390 |
|
|
|
31,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
13,614 |
|
|
|
18,173 |
|
|
|
18,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income |
|
|
9,421 |
|
|
|
7,346 |
|
|
|
7,829 |
|
| Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
| Net gains/(losses) on derivative instruments |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
| Net unrealized investment gains/(losses) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(1,460 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
| Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comprehensive income |
|
|
9,161 |
|
|
|
6,406 |
|
|
|
7,825 |
|
| Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
| Immaterial pooling of interests |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
| Common stock repurchased |
|
|
(4,686 |
) |
|
|
(5,680 |
) |
|
|
(6,191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, end of year |
|
|
18,173 |
|
|
|
18,899 |
|
|
|
20,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total stockholders’ equity |
|
$ |
41,368 |
|
|
$ |
47,289 |
|
|
$ |
52,180 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
Part II
Item 8
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 ACCOUNTING POLICIES
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
The financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The financial statements include the accounts of Microsoft
Corporation and its subsidiaries (Microsoft). Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Equity investments in which Microsoft owns at least 20% of the voting securities are accounted for using the equity method, except for
investments in which the Company is not able to exercise significant influence over the investee, in which case, the cost method of accounting is used. Issuances of shares by a subsidiary are accounted for as capital transactions.
ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS
Preparing financial statements requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. Examples include estimates of loss contingencies and product life cycles, and assumptions such as the elements comprising a
software arrangement, including the distinction between upgrades/enhancements and new products; when the Company reaches technological feasibility for its products; the potential outcome of the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns; and determining when investment impairments are other-than-temporary. Actual results and outcomes may differ from these estimates and assumptions.
FOREIGN CURRENCIES
Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies are
translated at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are charged or credited to other comprehensive income (OCI). Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange prevailing
during the year.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Microsoft accounts for
the licensing of software in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists; (ii) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectibility is reasonably assured. For software arrangements with multiple elements, revenue is recognized
dependent upon whether vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value exists for each of the elements. When VSOE does not exist for all the elements of a software arrangement and the only undelivered element is postcontract customer support
(PCS), the entire licensing fee is recognized ratably over the contract period. Revenue attributable to undelivered elements, including technical support and Internet browser technologies, is based on the average sales price of those elements when
sold separately, and is recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the product’s life cycle. PCS and subscription revenue is recognized ratably over the contract period.
Revenue from products licensed to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) is based on the licensing agreement with an OEM and has historically been recognized when OEMs ship licensed products to their customers. Licensing
provisions were modified with the introduction of Windows XP in 2002 and revenue for certain products is recorded upon shipment of the product to OEMs. The effect of this change in licensing provisions was not material. Revenue from packaged product
sales to distributors and resellers is usually recorded when related products are shipped. However, when the revenue recognition criteria required for distributor and reseller arrangements are not met, revenue is recognized as payments are received.
Revenue related to the Company’s Xbox game console is recognized upon shipment of the product to retailers. Online advertising revenue is recognized as advertisements are displayed. Costs related to insignificant obligations, which include
telephone support for certain products, are accrued. Provisions are recorded for estimated returns, concessions, and bad debts.
COST OF REVENUE
Cost of revenue includes direct costs to manufacture and distribute product and direct costs to provide online services, consulting, product
support, and training and certification of system integrators.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Technological feasibility for Microsoft’s software products is reached shortly before the products are released to manufacturing. Costs incurred after technological feasibility is established are not
material, and accordingly, the Company expenses all research and development costs when incurred.
ADVERTISING COSTS
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was $1.23 billion in 2000, $1.36 billion in 2001, and $1.27 billion in 2002.
Part II
Item 8
INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense includes U.S. and international income taxes, plus the provision for U.S. taxes on undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries not deemed to be permanently invested. Certain items of income and expense are
not reported in tax returns and financial statements in the same year. The tax effect of this difference is reported as deferred income taxes.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company considers all liquid interest-earning investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash
equivalents. Short-term investments generally mature between three months and six years from the purchase date. Investments with maturities beyond one year may be classified as short-term based on their highly liquid nature and because such
marketable securities represent the investment of cash that is available for current operations. All cash and short-term investments are classified as available for sale and are recorded at market value using the specific identification method;
unrealized gains and losses are reflected in OCI.
Equity and other investments include debt and equity instruments. Debt securities and publicly traded equity
securities are classified as available for sale and are recorded at market using the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses (excluding other-than-temporary impairments) are reflected in OCI. All other investments, excluding
those accounted for using the equity method, are recorded at cost.
Microsoft lends certain fixed income and equity securities to enhance investment income.
Collateral and/or security interest is determined based upon the underlying security and the creditworthiness of the borrower. The fair value of collateral that Microsoft is permitted to sell or repledge was $499 million at both June 30, 2001 and
2002.
Investments are considered to be impaired when a decline in fair value is judged to be other-than-temporary. The Company employs a systematic methodology
that considers available evidence in evaluating potential impairment of its investments. In the event that the cost of an investment exceeds its fair value, the Company evaluates, among other factors, the duration and extent to which the fair value
is less than cost; the financial health of and business outlook for the investee, including industry and sector performance, changes in technology, and operational and financing cash flow factors; and the Company’s intent and ability to hold
the investment. Once a decline in fair value is determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and a new cost basis in the investment is established. In 2001, the Company recognized $4.80 billion in impairments of certain
investments, primarily in the cable and telecommunication industries. In 2002, Microsoft recognized $4.32 billion in impairments of certain investments, primarily related to further declines in the fair values of U.S. and European cable and
telecommunications holdings.
The Company uses derivative instruments to manage exposures to foreign currency, security price, and interest rate risks. The
Company’s objectives for holding derivatives are to minimize these risks using the most effective methods to eliminate or reduce the impact of these exposures.
Foreign Currency Risk. Certain forecasted transactions and assets are exposed to foreign currency risk. The Company monitors its foreign currency exposures daily to maximize the overall
effectiveness of its foreign currency hedge positions. Principal currencies hedged include the Euro, Japanese yen, British pound, and Canadian dollar. Options used to hedge a portion of forecasted international revenue for up to three years in the
future are designated as cash flow hedging instruments. Options and forwards not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 are also used to hedge the impact of the variability in exchange rates on accounts receivable and collections
denominated in certain foreign currencies.
Securities Price Risk. Strategic equity investments are subject to market
price risk. From time to time, the Company uses and designates options to hedge fair values and cash flows on certain equity securities. The security, or forecasted sale thereof, selected for hedging is determined by market conditions, up-front
costs, and other relevant factors. Once established, the hedges are not dynamically managed or traded, and are generally not removed until maturity.
Interest Rate Risk. Fixed-income securities are subject to interest rate risk. The fixed-income portfolio is diversified and consists primarily of investment grade securities to minimize credit risk. The
Company routinely uses options, not designated as hedging instruments, to hedge its exposure to interest rate risk in the event of a catastrophic increase in interest rates.
Other Derivatives. In addition, the Company may invest in warrants to purchase securities of other companies as a strategic investment. Warrants that can be net share settled are
deemed derivative financial instruments and are not designated as hedging instruments.
For options designated either as fair value or cash flow hedges, changes in
the time value are excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management’s best estimate of probable losses inherent in the account receivable balance. Management determines the allowance based on known troubled
accounts, historical experience, and other currently available evidence. Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Year Ended June 30 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
Write-offs and other |
|
Balance at end of period |
| |
| |
|
2002 |
|
$ |
174 |
|
$ |
192 |
|
$ |
157 |
|
$ |
209 |
| |
|
2001 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
157 |
|
|
169 |
|
|
174 |
| |
|
2000 |
|
|
204 |
|
|
77 |
|
|
95 |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II
Item 8
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, using the average cost method. Cost includes materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead related to the purchase and production of inventories.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated using
the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated life of the asset or the lease term, ranging from one to 15 years. Computer software developed or obtained for internal use is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life of the software, generally not in excess of three years.
GOODWILL
Beginning in fiscal 2002 with the adoption of SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is no longer amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. Prior to fiscal 2002, goodwill was amortized
using the straight-line method over its estimated period of benefit.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from three to seven years. The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of intangible assets and takes
into account events or circumstances that warrant revised estimates of useful lives or that indicate that an impairment exists. All of Microsoft’s intangible assets are subject to amortization.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications have been made for consistent
presentation.
NOTE 2 ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Effective July 1, 2000, the Company adopted SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative
instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The adoption of SFAS 133 on July 1, 2000, resulted in a cumulative pre-tax reduction to income of $560 million ($375 million after-tax) and
a cumulative pre-tax reduction to OCI of $112 million ($75 million after-tax). The reduction to income was mostly attributable to a loss of approximately $300 million reclassified from OCI for the time value of options and a loss of approximately
$250 million reclassified from OCI for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments. The reduction to OCI was mostly attributable to losses of approximately $670 million on cash flow hedges offset by reclassifications out of OCI of the
approximately $300 million loss for the time value of options and the approximately $250 million loss for derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments. The net derivative losses included in OCI as of July 1, 2000 were reclassified
into earnings during the twelve months ended June 30, 2001. The change in accounting from the adoption of SFAS 133 did not materially affect net income in 2001.
Effective July 1, 2001, Microsoft adopted SFAS 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 141 requires business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting. It also specifies the types of acquired intangible assets that are required to be recognized and reported separate from goodwill. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and certain intangibles no longer be
amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually. There was no impairment of goodwill upon adoption of SFAS 142.
Net income and earnings per share
for fiscal 2000 and fiscal 2001 adjusted to exclude amortization expense (net of taxes) is as follows:
| In Millions, Except Earnings Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
| |
| Net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reported net income |
|
$ |
9,421 |
|
$ |
7,346 |
| Goodwill amortization |
|
|
203 |
|
|
252 |
| Equity method goodwill amortization |
|
|
1 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
| Adjusted net income |
|
$ |
9,625 |
|
$ |
7,624 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reported basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
$ |
1.38 |
| Goodwill amortization |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
0.05 |
| Equity method goodwill amortization |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
| Adjusted basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
$ |
1.43 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Reported diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
$ |
1.32 |
| Goodwill amortization |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
0.05 |
| Equity method goodwill amortization |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
| Adjusted diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
$ |
1.37 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II
Item 8
NOTE 3 UNEARNED REVENUE
A portion of Microsoft’s revenue under volume licensing programs is earned ratably over the period of the license agreement. Also, revenue attributable to undelivered
elements, including technical support and Internet browser technologies, is based on the average sales price of those elements when sold separately, and is recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the product’s life cycle. The
percentage of revenue recognized ratably for undelivered elements ranges from approximately 20% to 25% for Windows XP Home, approximately 10% to 15% for Windows XP Professional, and approximately 10% to 15% for desktop applications, depending on the
terms and conditions of the license and prices of the elements. Product life cycles are currently estimated at three years for Windows operating systems and 18 months for desktop applications.
The components of unearned revenue were as follows:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
| |
| Volume licensing programs |
|
$ |
1,922 |
|
$ |
4,158 |
| Undelivered elements |
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
2,830 |
| Other |
|
|
874 |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
|
| Unearned revenue |
|
$ |
5,614 |
|
$ |
7,743 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned revenue by product was as follows:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
| |
| Desktop Applications |
|
$ |
2,189 |
|
$ |
3,489 |
| Desktop Platforms |
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
3,198 |
| Enterprise Software and Services |
|
|
391 |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
|
| Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services |
|
|
5,166 |
|
|
7,478 |
| Consumer Software, Services, and Devices, and Other |
|
|
448 |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
| Unearned revenue |
|
$ |
5,614 |
|
$ |
7,743 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $7.74 billion of unearned revenue at June 30, 2002, $2.28 billion is
expected to be recognized in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, $1.64 billion in the second quarter of fiscal 2003, $1.18 billion in the third quarter of fiscal 2003, $817 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, and $1.82 billion thereafter.
Part II
Item 8
NOTE 4 CASH AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30, 2001 |
|
Cost
Basis |
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Recorded Basis |
| |
| Cash and equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash |
|
$ |
1,145 |
|
$ |
– |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
1,145 |
| Commercial paper |
|
|
894 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
894 |
| Certificates of deposit |
|
|
286 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
286 |
| U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
400 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
400 |
| Corporate notes and bonds |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,130 |
| Municipal securities |
|
|
67 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash and equivalents |
|
|
3,922 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
3,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial paper |
|
|
635 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
638 |
| U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
7,355 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
7,322 |
| Corporate notes and bonds |
|
|
17,256 |
|
|
214 |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
17,321 |
| Municipal securities |
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,703 |
| Certificates of deposit |
|
|
694 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Short-term investments |
|
|
27,602 |
|
|
267 |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
27,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash and short-term investments |
|
$ |
31,524 |
|
$ |
267 |
|
$ |
(191 |
) |
|
$ |
31,600 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30, 2002 |
|
Cost
Basis |
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Recorded Basis |
| |
| Cash and equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash |
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
$ |
– |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
| Commercial paper |
|
|
260 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
260 |
| Certificates of deposit |
|
|
31 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
31 |
| Money market mutual funds |
|
|
714 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
714 |
| Corporate notes and bonds |
|
|
560 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
560 |
| Municipal securities |
|
|
337 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash and equivalents |
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Commercial paper |
|
|
552 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
552 |
| U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
10,726 |
|
|
114 |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
10,827 |
| Corporate notes and bonds |
|
|
18,822 |
|
|
255 |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
18,836 |
| Municipal securities |
|
|
4,462 |
|
|
86 |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,548 |
| Certificates of deposit |
|
|
873 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Short-term investments |
|
|
35,435 |
|
|
455 |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
35,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash and short-term investments |
|
$ |
38,451 |
|
$ |
455 |
|
$ |
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
38,652 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains and (losses) from cash and short-term investments were $80
million and $(226) million in 2000, $541 million and $(369) million in 2001, and $816 million and $(558) million in 2002.
Part II
Item 8
NOTE 5 INVENTORIES
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
| |
| Finished goods |
|
$ |
78 |
|
$ |
505 |
| Raw materials and work in process |
|
|
5 |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
| Inventories |
|
$ |
83 |
|
$ |
673 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30 |
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Land |
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
| Buildings |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
1,701 |
|
| Computer equipment and software |
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
| Other |
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Property and equipment – at cost |
|
|
5,275 |
|
|
|
5,891 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(2,966 |
) |
|
|
(3,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Property and equipment – net |
|
$ |
2,309 |
|
|
$ |
2,268 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2000, 2001, and 2002, depreciation expense, of which the majority
related to computer equipment, was $668 million, $764 million, and $820 million.
NOTE 7 EQUITY AND OTHER
INVESTMENTS
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30, 2001 |
|
Cost
Basis |
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Recorded Basis |
| |
| Debt securities recorded at market, maturing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Within one year |
|
$ |
500 |
|
$ |
– |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
500 |
| Between 2 and 10 years |
|
|
643 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
652 |
| Between 10 and 15 years |
|
|
513 |
|
|
– |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
504 |
| Beyond 15 years |
|
|
4,754 |
|
|
– |
|
|
(829 |
) |
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Debt securities recorded at market |
|
|
6,410 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
5,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common stock and warrants |
|
|
5,555 |
|
|
2,030 |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
7,300 |
| Preferred stock |
|
|
881 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
881 |
| Other investments |
|
|
599 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Equity and other investments |
|
$ |
13,445 |
|
$ |
2,042 |
|
$ |
(1,126 |
) |
|
$ |
14,361 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II
Item 8
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30, 2002 |
|
Cost
Basis |
|
Unrealized Gains |
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Recorded Basis |
| |
| Debt securities recorded at market, maturing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Within one year |
|
$ |
485 |
|
$ |
26 |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
511 |
| Between 2 and 10 years |
|
|
893 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
935 |
| Between 10 and 15 years |
|
|
541 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
558 |
| Beyond 15 years |
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Debt securities recorded at market |
|
|
4,955 |
|
|
91 |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
5,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common stock and warrants |
|
|
6,930 |
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
7,600 |
| Preferred stock |
|
|
1,382 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,382 |
| Other investments |
|
|
169 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Equity and other investments |
|
$ |
13,436 |
|
$ |
1,378 |
|
$ |
(623 |
) |
|
$ |
14,191 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities include corporate and government notes and bonds and
derivative securities. Debt securities maturing beyond 15 years are composed entirely of AT&T 5% convertible preferred debt with a contractual maturity of 30 years. The debt is convertible at the Company’s option into AT&T common stock
on or after December 1, 2000, or may be redeemed by AT&T upon satisfaction of certain conditions on or after June 1, 2002. In connection with the definitive agreement to combine AT&T Broadband with Comcast in a new company to be called
AT&T Comcast Corporation, Microsoft has agreed to exchange its AT&T 5% convertible preferred debt securities for approximately 115 million shares of AT&T Comcast Corporation. It is expected that the transaction will close by December 31,
2002. While it is possible that Microsoft could incur a loss on this exchange transaction up to the carrying value of the AT&T debt securities, management believes that the ultimate loss, if any, will be significantly less. As management is
unable to predict whether there will be a gain or loss on the exchange, no loss has been recorded related to this contingent exchange transaction as of June 30, 2002.
Equity securities that are restricted for more than one year or not publicly traded are recorded at cost. At June 30, 2001 the estimated fair value of these investments in excess of their recorded basis was $161 million. At June 30,
2002 the recorded basis of these investments in excess of their estimated fair value was $34 million. This excess of cost over estimated fair value was deemed temporary in nature. The estimate of fair value is based on publicly available market
information or other estimates determined by management. Realized gains and (losses) from equity and other investments (excluding impairments discussed previously) were $1.94 billion and $(10) million in 2000, $3.03 billion and $(23) million in
2001, and $2.24 billion and $(121) million in 2002.
NOTE 8 GOODWILL
During fiscal 2002, goodwill was reduced by $85 million, principally in connection with Microsoft’s exchange of all of its 33.7 million shares and warrants of
Expedia, Inc. to USA Networks, Inc. No goodwill was acquired or impaired during fiscal 2002. As of June 30, 2002, Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services goodwill was $1.1 billion, Consumer Software, Services, and Devices goodwill was $258
million, and Consumer Commerce Investments goodwill was $72 million.
NOTE 9 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
During fiscal 2002, changes in intangible assets primarily relates to the Company’s acquisition of $25 million in patents and licenses and
$27 million in existing technology, which will be amortized over approximately 3 years. No significant residual value is estimated for these intangible assets. Intangible assets amortization expense was $202 million for fiscal 2001 and $194 million
for fiscal 2002. The components of intangible assets were as follows:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Gross Carrying Amount |
|
Accumulated Amortization |
|
|
Gross Carrying Amount |
|
Accumulated Amortization |
|
| |
| Patents and licenses |
|
$ |
407 |
|
$ |
(177 |
) |
|
$ |
421 |
|
$ |
(290 |
) |
| Existing technology |
|
|
157 |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
172 |
|
|
(71 |
) |
| Trademarks, tradenames and other |
|
|
83 |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Intangible assets |
|
$ |
647 |
|
$ |
(246 |
) |
|
$ |
608 |
|
$ |
(365 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense for the net carrying amount of intangible assets at June
30, 2002 is estimated to be $115 million in fiscal 2003, $90 million in fiscal 2004, $36 million in fiscal 2005, and $2 million in fiscal 2006.
Part II
Item 8
NOTE 10 DERIVATIVES
For fiscal 2001, investment income included a net unrealized loss of $592 million, comprised of a $214 million gain for changes in the time value of options for fair value
hedges, $211 million loss for changes in the time value of options for cash flow hedges, and $595 million loss for changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments. For fiscal 2002, investment income included
a net unrealized loss of $480 million, comprised of a $30 million gain for changes in the time value of options for fair value hedges, $331 million loss for changes in the time value of options for cash flow hedges, and $179 million net loss for
changes in the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments.
Derivative gains and losses included in OCI are reclassified into
earnings at the time forecasted revenue or the sale of an equity investment is recognized. During fiscal 2001, $214 million of derivative gains were reclassified to revenue and $416 million of derivative losses were reclassified to investment
income/(loss). During fiscal 2002, $234 million of derivative gains were reclassified to revenue and $10 million of derivative losses were reclassified to investment income/(loss). The derivative losses reclassified to investment income/(loss) were
offset by gains on the item being hedged. The Company estimates that $63 million of net derivative gains included in other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings within the next twelve months.
For instruments designated as hedges, hedge ineffectiveness, determined in accordance with SFAS 133, had no impact on earnings for the fiscal 2001 and 2002. No fair value hedges or
cash flow hedges were derecognized or discontinued for fiscal 2001 and 2002.
NOTE 11 INVESTMENT
INCOME/(LOSS)
The components of investment income/(loss) are as follows:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Dividends |
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
| Interest |
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
| Net recognized gains/(losses) on investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net gains on the sales of investments |
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
3,175 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
| Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(4,804 |
) |
|
|
(4,323 |
) |
| Net unrealized losses attributable to derivative instruments |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net recognized gains/(losses) on investments |
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
(2,221 |
) |
|
|
(2,424 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investment income/(loss) |
|
$ |
3,326 |
|
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
$ |
(305 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12 INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consisted of:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Current taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| U.S. and state |
|
$ |
4,744 |
|
|
$ |
3,243 |
|
$ |
3,644 |
|
| International |
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current taxes |
|
|
5,279 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
4,219 |
|
| Deferred taxes |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
4,854 |
|
|
$ |
3,804 |
|
$ |
3,684 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. and international components of income before income taxes were:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
| |
| U.S. |
|
$ |
11,860 |
|
$ |
9,189 |
|
$ |
8,920 |
| International |
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
2,336 |
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
14,275 |
|
$ |
11,525 |
|
$ |
11,513 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part II
Item 8
In 2000, the effective tax rate was 34.0%, and included the effect of a
2.5% reduction from the U.S. statutory rate for tax credits and a 1.5% increase for other items. In 2001, the effective tax rate was 33.0%, and included the effect of a 3.1% reduction from the U.S. statutory rate for tax credits and a 1.1% increase
for other items. The effective tax rate in 2002 was 32.0%, and included the effect of a 2.4% reduction from the U.S. statutory rate for the extraterritorial income exclusion tax benefit and a 0.6% reduction for other items.
Deferred income taxes were:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30 |
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Deferred income tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revenue items |
|
$ |
1,469 |
|
|
$ |
2,261 |
|
| Expense items |
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
| Impaired investments |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Deferred income tax assets |
|
$ |
3,230 |
|
|
$ |
5,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Deferred income tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Unrealized gain on investments |
|
$ |
(395 |
) |
|
$ |
(887 |
) |
| International earnings |
|
|
(1,667 |
) |
|
|
(1,818 |
) |
| Other |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Deferred income tax liabilities |
|
$ |
(2,117 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,508 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft has not provided for U.S. deferred income taxes or foreign
withholding taxes on $780 million of its undistributed earnings for certain non-U.S. subsidiaries, all of which relate to fiscal 2002 earnings, since these earnings are intended to be reinvested indefinitely.
On September 15, 2000, the U.S. Tax Court issued an adverse ruling with respect to Microsoft’s claim that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) incorrectly assessed taxes for 1990
and 1991. The Company has filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on this matter. Income taxes, except for items related to the 1990 and 1991 assessments, have been settled with the IRS for all years through 1996. The IRS
is examining the Company’s 1997 through 1999 U.S. income tax returns. Management believes any adjustments which may be required will not be material to the financial statements. Income taxes paid were $800 million in 2000, $1.3 billion in 2001,
and $1.9 billion in 2002.
NOTE 13 STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Shares of common stock outstanding were as follows:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Balance, beginning of year |
|
5,109 |
|
|
5,283 |
|
|
5,383 |
|
| Issued |
|
229 |
|
|
189 |
|
|
104 |
|
| Repurchased |
|
(55 |
) |
|
(89 |
) |
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, end of year |
|
5,283 |
|
|
5,383 |
|
|
5,359 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company repurchases its common shares in the open market to provide
shares for issuance to employees under stock option and stock purchase plans. In 2002, the Company acquired 5.1 million of its shares as a result of a structured stock repurchase transaction entered into in 2001, which gave it the right to acquire
such shares in exchange for an up-front net payment of $264 million. To enhance its stock repurchase program, Microsoft has sold put warrants to independent third parties. These put warrants entitled the holders to sell shares of Microsoft common
stock to the Company on certain dates at specified prices. In the third quarter of fiscal 2001, the Company issued 2.8 million shares to settle a portion of the outstanding put warrants. At June 30, 2001 and 2002, there were no outstanding put
warrants.
During 1996, Microsoft issued 12.5 million shares of 2.75% convertible exchangeable principal-protected preferred stock. The Company’s convertible
preferred stock matured on December 15, 1999. Each preferred share was converted into 1.1273 common shares.
Part II
Item 8
NOTE 14 OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax effect of $(37) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net gains/(losses) on derivative instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Unrealized gains, net of tax effect of $246 in 2001 and $30 in 2002 |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
| Reclassification adjustment for (gains)/losses included in net income, net of tax effect
of $67 in 2001 and $(79) in
2002 |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net gains/(losses) on derivative instruments |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net unrealized investment gains/(losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Unrealized holding gains/(losses), net of tax effect of $248 in 2000, $(351) in 2001,
and $(955) in 2002 |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
(1,774 |
) |
| Reclassification adjustment for (gains)/losses included in net income, net of tax effect
of $(420) in 2000, $(128) in 2001, and
$958 in 2002 |
|
|
(814 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net unrealized investment gains/(losses) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(1,460 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
$ |
(260 |
) |
|
$ |
(940 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income were:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30 |
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
| Net gains on derivative instruments |
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
| Net unrealized investment gains |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
| Translation adjustments and other |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
$ |
587 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 15 EMPLOYEE STOCK AND SAVINGS PLANS
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Company has an employee stock purchase
plan for all eligible employees. Under the plan, shares of the Company’s common stock may be purchased at six-month intervals at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each six-month period. Employees may
purchase shares having a value not exceeding 15% of their gross compensation during an offering period. During 2000, 2001, and 2002, employees purchased 2.5 million, 5.7 million, and 5.4 million shares at average prices of $72.38, $36.87, and $50.52
per share. At June 30, 2002, 56.8 million shares were reserved for future issuance.
SAVINGS PLAN
The Company has a savings plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participating employees may contribute up to 25% of their pretax salary, but not more than statutory limits. The
Company contributes fifty cents for each dollar a participant contributes, with a maximum contribution of 3% of a participant’s earnings. Matching contributions were $47 million, $63 million, and $77 million in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company has stock option plans for
directors, officers, and employees, which provide for nonqualified and incentive stock options. Options granted prior to 1995 generally vest over four and one-half years and expire 10 years from the date of grant. Options granted between 1995 and
2001 generally vest over four and one-half years and expire seven years from the date of grant, while certain options vest either over four and one-half years or over seven and one-half years and expire after 10 years. Options granted during 2002
vest over four and one-half years and expire 10 years from the date of grant. At June 30, 2002, options for 371 million shares were vested and 543 million shares were available for future grants under the plans.
Part II
Item 8
Stock options outstanding were as follows:
| In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Price per Share |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Shares |
|
|
Range |
|
Weighted Average |
| |
| Balance, June 30, 1999 |
|
766 |
|
|
$ 0.56 – $ 83.28 |
|
$ 23.87 |
| Granted |
|
304 |
|
|
65.56 – 119.13 |
|
79.87 |
| Exercised |
|
(198 |
) |
|
0.56 – 82.94 |
|
9.54 |
| Canceled |
|
(40 |
) |
|
4.63 – 116.56 |
|
36.50 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, June 30, 2000 |
|
832 |
|
|
0.56 – 119.13 |
|
41.23 |
| Granted |
|
224 |
|
|
41.50 – 80.00 |
|
60.84 |
| Exercised |
|
(123 |
) |
|
0.59 – 85.81 |
|
11.13 |
| Canceled |
|
(35 |
) |
|
13.83 – 119.13 |
|
63.57 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, June 30, 2001 |
|
898 |
|
|
0.56 – 119.13 |
|
49.54 |
| Granted |
|
41 |
|
|
48.62 – 72.57 |
|
62.50 |
| Exercised |
|
(99 |
) |
|
1.02 – 69.81 |
|
12.82 |
| Canceled |
|
(38 |
) |
|
1.15 – 116.56 |
|
68.67 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Balance, June 30, 2002 |
|
802 |
|
|
0.79 – 119.13 |
|
53.75 |
| |
|
|
For various price ranges, weighted average characteristics of outstanding
stock options at June 30, 2002 were as follows:
| In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts |
|
| |
| |
|
Outstanding Options |
|
Exercisable Options |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Shares |
|
Remaining Life (Years) |
|
Weighted Average Price |
|
Shares |
|
Weighted Average Price |
| |
| $ 0.79 – $ 5.97 |
|
36 |
|
1.6 |
|
$ 4.83 |
|
35 |
|
$ 4.82 |
| 5.98 – 13.62 |
|
44 |
|
0.5 |
|
11.19 |
|
42 |
|
11.18 |
| 13.63 – 29.80 |
|
90 |
|
2.0 |
|
15.02 |
|
84 |
|
14.97 |
| 29.81 – 43.62 |
|
73 |
|
2.7 |
|
32.19 |
|
66 |
|
32.09 |
| 43.63 – 60.00 |
|
191 |
|
6.9 |
|
55.81 |
|
41 |
|
54.03 |
| 60.01 – 69.50 |
|
146 |
|
6.4 |
|
66.24 |
|
35 |
|
66.53 |
| 69.51 – 83.28 |
|
80 |
|
5.1 |
|
71.17 |
|
21 |
|
71.84 |
| 83.29 – 119.13 |
|
142 |
|
4.2 |
|
89.87 |
|
47 |
|
89.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company follows Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, to account for stock option and employee stock purchase plans. An alternative method of accounting for stock options is SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Employee stock options are valued at
grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation model, and this compensation cost is recognized ratably over the vesting period.
Part II
Item 8
Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock option and employee stock purchase plans been determined as prescribed by SFAS 123, pro
forma income statements for 2000, 2001, and 2002 would have been as follows:
| In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Reported |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Pro Forma |
|
| |
| Revenue |
|
$ |
22,956 |
|
|
$ |
22,956 |
|
|
$ |
25,296 |
|
|
$ |
25,296 |
|
|
$ |
28,365 |
|
|
$ |
28,365 |
|
| Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cost of revenue |
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
3,277 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
3,775 |
|
|
|
5,191 |
|
|
|
5,699 |
|
| Research and development |
|
|
3,772 |
|
|
|
4,814 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
6,106 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
6,299 |
|
| Sales and marketing |
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
|
4,885 |
|
|
|
5,888 |
|
|
|
5,407 |
|
|
|
6,252 |
|
| General and administrative |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total operating expenses |
|
|
11,950 |
|
|
|
13,843 |
|
|
|
13,576 |
|
|
|
16,953 |
|
|
|
16,455 |
|
|
|
20,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Operating income |
|
|
11,006 |
|
|
|
9,113 |
|
|
|
11,720 |
|
|
|
8,343 |
|
|
|
11,910 |
|
|
|
8,272 |
|
| Losses on equity investees and other |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
| Investment income/(loss) |
|
|
3,326 |
|
|
|
3,326 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Income before income taxes |
|
|
14,275 |
|
|
|
12,382 |
|
|
|
11,525 |
|
|
|
8,148 |
|
|
|
11,513 |
|
|
|
7,875 |
|
| Provision for income taxes |
|
|
4,854 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
3,804 |
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Income before accounting change |
|
|
9,421 |
|
|
|
8,172 |
|
|
|
7,721 |
|
|
|
5,459 |
|
|
|
7,829 |
|
|
|
5,355 |
|
| Cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income |
|
$ |
9,421 |
|
|
$ |
8,172 |
|
|
$ |
7,346 |
|
|
$ |
5,084 |
|
|
$ |
7,829 |
|
|
$ |
5,355 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.99 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average Black-Scholes value of options granted under the stock
option plans during 2000, 2001, and 2002 was $36.67, $29.31, and $31.57. Value was estimated using a weighted average expected life of 6.2 years in 2000, 6.4 years in 2001, and 7.0 years in 2002, no dividends, volatility of .33 in 2000, .39 in 2001,
and .39 in 2002, and risk-free interest rates of 6.2%, 5.3%, and 5.4% in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
Part II
Item 8
NOTE 16 EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of outstanding preferred shares using the “if-converted” method, outstanding put warrants using the “reverse treasury stock” method, and outstanding stock
options using the “treasury stock” method.
The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows:
| In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
| |
| Income before accounting change |
|
$ |
9,421 |
|
$ |
7,721 |
|
$ |
7,829 |
| Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
13 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net income available for common shareholders |
|
$ |
9,408 |
|
$ |
7,721 |
|
$ |
7,829 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock |
|
|
5,189 |
|
|
5,341 |
|
|
5,406 |
| Dilutive effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Put warrants |
|
|
2 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
– |
| Preferred stock |
|
|
7 |
|
|
– |
|
|
– |
| Employee stock options |
|
|
338 |
|
|
212 |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common stock and common stock equivalents |
|
|
5,536 |
|
|
5,574 |
|
|
5,553 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Earnings per share before accounting change: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Basic |
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
$ |
1.45 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Diluted |
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
$ |
1.41 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended June 30, 2000, 2001 and 2002, 45 million, 351 million,
and 373 million shares attributable to outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was antidilutive.
NOTE 17 OPERATIONAL TRANSACTIONS
In January 2000, the Company acquired Visio
Corporation in a transaction that was accounted for as a pooling of interests. Microsoft issued 14 million shares valued at approximately $1.5 billion in the exchange for the outstanding stock of Visio. Visio’s assets and liabilities, which
were nominal, are included with those of Microsoft as of the merger. Operating results for Visio from periods prior to the merger were not material to the combined results of the two companies. Accordingly, the financial statements for such periods
have not been restated.
In April 2001, the Company acquired Great Plains Software, Inc. for approximately $1.1 billion in stock. Great Plains is a leading supplier
of mid-market business applications. The acquisition was accounted for by the purchase method and operating results for Great Plains subsequent to the date of acquisition are included with those of Microsoft. The pro forma impact of Great
Plains’ operating results prior to the date of acquisition was not material.
NOTE 18 COMMITMENTS
The Company has operating leases for most U.S. and international sales and support offices and certain equipment. Rental expense for operating
leases was $201 million, $281 million, and $318 million in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Future minimum rental commitments under noncancellable leases, in millions of dollars, are: 2003, $260; 2004, $219; 2005, $197; 2006, $170; 2007, $135; and thereafter,
$302. Microsoft has committed $111 million for constructing new buildings. In addition, the Company has guaranteed $536 million in debt of its equity investees.
NOTE 19 CONTINGENCIES
The Company is a defendant in U.S. v. Microsoft,
a lawsuit filed by the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and a group of eighteen state Attorneys General alleging violations of the Sherman Act and various state antitrust laws. After the trial, the District Court entered
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law stating that Microsoft had violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and various state antitrust laws. A Judgment was entered on June 7, 2000 ordering, among other things, the breakup of Microsoft into two
companies.
Part II
Item 8
The Judgment was stayed pending an appeal. On June 28, 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated the Judgment in its
entirety and remanded the case to the District Court for a new trial on one Section 1 claim and for entry of a new judgment consistent with its ruling. In its ruling, the Court of Appeals substantially narrowed the bases of liability found by the
District Court, but affirmed some of the District Court’s conclusions that Microsoft had violated Section 2. On October 12, 2001, the trial court held a status conference and entered orders requiring the parties to engage in settlement
discussions until November 2, 2001. Microsoft entered into a settlement with the United States on November 2, 2001. Nine states (New York, Ohio, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina and Wisconsin) agreed to
settle on substantially the same terms on November 6, 2001. A hearing on the settlement was held by the Court on March 6, 2002. The Court will now decide whether to approve the settlement as being in the public interest. Nine states and the District
of Columbia continue to litigate the remedies phase of U.S. v. Microsoft. The non-settling states are seeking imposition of a remedy that would impose much broader restrictions on Microsoft’s business than the proposed settlement with
the DOJ and nine other states. The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing related to the non-settling states’ proposed remedies from March 18 to June 19, 2002. A decision is anticipated later in calendar 2002.
In other ongoing investigations, the DOJ and several state Attorneys General have requested information from Microsoft concerning various issues. In addition, the European Commission
has instituted proceedings in which it alleges that Microsoft has failed to disclose information that Microsoft competitors claim they need to interoperate fully with Windows 2000 clients and servers and has engaged in discriminatory licensing of
such technology, as well as improper bundling of multimedia playback technology in the Windows operating system. The remedies sought, though not fully defined, include mandatory disclosure of Microsoft Windows operating system technology and
imposition of fines. Microsoft denies the European Commission’s allegations and intends to contest the proceedings vigorously.
A large number of overcharge
class action lawsuits have been initiated against Microsoft in various state and Federal courts. These cases allege that Microsoft has competed unfairly and unlawfully monopolized alleged markets for operating systems and certain software
applications and seek to recover alleged overcharges that the complaints contend Microsoft charged for these products. Microsoft believes the claims are without merit and is vigorously defending the cases. To date, Microsoft has won dismissals of
all claims for damages by indirect purchasers under Federal law and in 17 separate state court proceedings, of which seven have been affirmed and one has been reversed. Claims on behalf of foreign purchasers have also been dismissed. Appeals of
several of these rulings are still pending. No trials or other proceedings have been held concerning any liability issues. Courts in several states have ruled that these cases may proceed as class actions, while two courts have denied class
certification status to the claims in that state proceeding and another has ruled that no class action is available for claims in that state. In fiscal 2002, the Company recorded a contingent liability of approximately $660 million representing
management’s estimate of the costs of resolving the contingency. Management’s contingent liability estimate is based upon a proposed settlement between Microsoft and lead counsel for the Federal plaintiffs. While the proposed settlement
was not approved by the District Court, management believes that the proposal represents the best estimate of the costs of resolving the contingency based on currently available information. The Company intends to continue vigorously defending these
lawsuits.
Netscape Communications Inc., a subsidiary of AOL-Time Warner Inc., filed suit against Microsoft on January 22, 2002 in Federal court in the District of
Columbia, alleging violations of antitrust and unfair competition laws and other tort claims relating to Netscape and its Navigator browser. The complaint includes claims of unlawful monopolization or attempted monopolization of alleged markets for
operating systems and Web browsers, illegal tying of operating systems and browsers, and tortuous interference with Netscape’s business relations. Netscape seeks injunctive relief, unquantified treble damages and its fees and costs. Microsoft
denies these allegations and will vigorously defend this action. The case has been transferred for pretrial purposes to the District Court in Baltimore, Maryland and is being coordinated with the overcharge class actions described above.
Be Incorporated, a former software development company whose assets were acquired by Palm Incorporated in August 2001, filed suit against Microsoft on February 18,
2002 in Federal court in San Francisco, alleging violations of Federal and state antitrust and unfair competition laws and other tort claims. Be alleges that Microsoft’s license agreements with computer manufacturers, pricing policies, and
business practices interfered with Be’s relationships with computer manufacturers and discouraged them from adopting Be’s own operating system for their products. Be is seeking unquantified treble and punitive damages for its alleged
injuries along with its fees and costs. Microsoft denies these allegations and will vigorously defend this action. The case has been transferred for pretrial purposes to the District Court in Baltimore, Maryland and is being coordinated with the
overcharge class actions described above.
On March 8, 2002, Sun Microsystems, Inc. filed suit against Microsoft alleging violations of Federal and state antitrust
and unfair competition laws as well as claims under the Federal Copyright Act. Sun seeks injunctive relief and unspecified treble damages along with its fees and costs. Microsoft denies these allegations and will vigorously defend this action. The
case has been transferred for pretrial purposes to the District Court in Baltimore, Maryland and is being coordinated with the overcharge class actions described above.
On June 3, 2002, Microsoft and the Securities and Exchange Commission entered into an administrative settlement resolving a non-public investigation of certain of Microsoft’s accounting and record keeping practices during fiscal
years 1995 through 1998 (SEC File No. 3-10789). The settlement provides that Microsoft will not violate securities regulations that require companies to make accurate filings and maintain sufficient records and controls. The settlement has no impact
on the Company’s financial results.
The Company is also subject to a variety of other claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of
its business.
Management currently believes that resolving all of these matters will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position or
its results of operations.
Part II
Item 8
NOTE 20 SEGMENT INFORMATION
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services |
|
Consumer
Software, Services, and Devices |
|
|
Consumer Commerce Investments |
|
|
Other |
|
Reconciling Amounts |
|
|
Consolidated |
| |
| 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revenue |
|
$ |
20,410 |
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
|
$ |
691 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
22,956 |
| Operating income/(loss) |
|
|
13,210 |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
(1,140 |
) |
|
|
11,006 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revenue |
|
$ |
22,720 |
|
$ |
1,961 |
|
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
$ |
652 |
|
$ |
(559 |
) |
|
$ |
25,296 |
| Operating income/(loss) |
|
|
14,261 |
|
|
(1,666 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
11,720 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revenue |
|
$ |
23,786 |
|
$ |
3,531 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
537 |
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
28,365 |
| Operating income/(loss) |
|
|
14,671 |
|
|
(1,778 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
11,910 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services Revenue:
| In Millions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year Ended June 30 |
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
| |
| Desktop Applications |
|
$ |
9,013 |
|
$ |
9,580 |
|
$ |
9,327 |
| Desktop Platforms |
|
|
7,383 |
|
|
8,265 |
|
|
9,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Desktop Software |
|
|
16,396 |
|
|
17,845 |
|
|
18,603 |
| Enterprise Software and Services |
|
|
4,014 |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
5,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services |
|
$ |
20,410 |
|
$ |
22,720 |
|
$ |
23,786 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fiscal 2002, Microsoft had four segments: Desktop and Enterprise Software
and Services; Consumer Software, Services, and Devices; Consumer Commerce Investments; and Other. Desktop and Enterprise Software and Services operating segment includes Desktop Applications, Desktop Platforms, and Enterprise Software and Services.
Desktop Applications include Microsoft Office; Microsoft Project; Visio; client access licenses for Windows NT Server and Windows 2000 Server, Exchange, and BackOffice; Microsoft Great Plains; and bCentral. Desktop Platforms include Windows XP
Professional and Home, Windows 2000 Professional, Windows NT Workstation, Windows Millennium Edition (Windows Me), Windows 98, and other desktop operating systems. Enterprise Software and Services includes Server Platforms; Server Applications;
developer tools and services; and Enterprise services. Consumer Software, Services, and Devices operating segment includes Xbox video game system, MSN Internet access, MSN network services, PC and online games, learning and productivity software,
mobility, and embedded systems. Consumer Commerce Investments operating segment includes Expedia, Inc., the HomeAdvisor online real estate service, and the CarPoint online automotive service. Other primarily includes Hardware and Microsoft Press.
Segment information is presented in accordance with SFAS 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. This standard is based on
a management approach, which requires segmentation based upon the Company’s internal organization and disclosure of revenue and operating income based upon internal accounting methods. The Company’s financial reporting systems present
various data for management to run the business, including internal profit and loss statements (P&Ls) prepared on a basis not consistent with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Assets are not allocated to segments for internal
reporting presentations.
Reconciling items for revenue include certain elements of unearned revenue and the treatment of certain channel inventory amounts and
estimates. In addition to the reconciling items for revenue, reconciling items for operating income/(loss) include general and administrative expenses ($1.05 billion in 2000, $857 million in 2001, and $1.55 billion in 2002), certain research
expenses ($141 million in 2000, $154 million in 2001, and $166 million in 2002), and other corporate level adjustments. The internal P&Ls use accelerated methods of depreciation and amortization. Additionally, losses on equity investees and
minority interests are classified in operating income for internal reporting presentations.
Part II
Item 8
Revenue attributable to U.S. operations includes shipments to customers in the United States, licensing to OEMs and
certain multinational organizations, and exports of finished goods, primarily to Asia, Latin America, and Canada. Revenue from U.S. operations totaled $15.7 billion, $17.8 billion, and $20.9 billion in 2000, 2001, and 2002. Revenue from outside the
United States, excluding licensing to OEMs and certain multinational organizations and U.S. exports, totaled $7.3 billion, $7.5 billion, and $7.5 billion in 2000, 2001, and 2002. No single customer accounted for 10% or more of revenue in 2000, 2001,
or 2002.
Long-lived assets (principally property and equipment) totaled $2.2 billion and $2.0 billion in the United States in 2001 and 2002 and $154 million and
$220 million in other countries in 2001 and 2002.
NOTE 21 SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 11, 2002, Microsoft acquired Navision a/s as a result of the successful close of a tender offer. Microsoft purchased Navision’s shares for approximately $1.45
billion in stock and cash. Navision is a provider of integrated business software solutions for small and medium-sized companies. The purchase price allocation is currently being developed for this acquisition.
QUARTERLY INFORMATION
| In millions, except per share amounts (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Quarter Ended |
|
Sept. 30 |
|
|
Dec. 31 |
|
Mar. 31 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
Year |
| |
| Fiscal 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revenue |
|
$ |
5,384 |
|
|
$ |
6,112 |
|
$ |
5,656 |
|
|
$ |
5,804 |
|
|
$ |
22,956 |
| Gross profit |
|
|
4,672 |
|
|
|
5,356 |
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
5,022 |
|
|
|
19,954 |
| Net income |
|
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
2,385 |
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
9,421 |
| Basic earnings per share |
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
| Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Fiscal 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revenue |
|
$ |
5,766 |
|
|
$ |
6,550 |
|
$ |
6,403 |
|
|
$ |
6,577 |
|
|
$ |
25,296 |
| Gross profit |
|
|
4,941 |
|
|
|
5,686 |
|
|
5,504 |
|
|
|
5,710 |
|
|
|
21,841 |
| Net income |
|
|
2,206 |
(1) |
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
65 |
(2) |
|
|
7,346 |
| Basic earnings per share |
|
|
0.42 |
(1) |
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
1.38 |
| Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
0.40 |
(1) |
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Fiscal 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Revenue |
|
$ |
6,126 |
|
|
$ |
7,741 |
|
$ |
7,245 |
|
|
$ |
7,253 |
|
|
$ |
28,365 |
| Gross profit |
|
|
5,242 |
|
|
|
6,197 |
|
|
5,850 |
|
|
|
5,885 |
|
|
|
23,174 |
| Net income |
|
|
1,283 |
(3) |
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
2,738 |
(4) |
|
|
1,525 |
(5) |
|
|
7,829 |
| Basic earnings per share |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
| Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes an unfavorable cumulative effect of accounting change of $375 million or $0.07 per basic share and $0.06 per diluted share, reflecting the adoption of SFAS No.
133. |
(2) |
|
Includes $3.92 billion (pre-tax) in impairments of certain investments. |
(3) |
|
Includes $1.82 billion (pre-tax) in impairments of certain investments. |
(4) |
|
Includes $1.25 billion (pre-tax) gain on the sale of Expedia, Inc. and $1.19 billion (pre-tax) in impairments of certain investments. |
(5) |
|
Includes $1.19 billion (pre-tax) in impairments of certain investments. |
Part II
Item 8, 9
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Microsoft Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets of Microsoft Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2001 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period
ended June 30, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Microsoft Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 and 2002, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As described in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, effective
July 1, 2000, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective July 1, 2001.
/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Seattle, Washington
July 18, 2002
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
None.
Part III
Item 10, 11, 12,
13
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information with respect to Directors may be found under the
caption “Election of Directors and Management Information” of the Company’s Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held November 5, 2002 (the “Proxy Statement”). Such information is incorporated herein
by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information in the Proxy Statement set forth under the captions
“Information Regarding Executive Officer Compensation” and “Information Regarding the Board and its Committees” is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
| In Millions, Except Per Share Amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| June 30, 2002 |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
| Plan category |
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in
column (a)) |
| |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
802 |
|
$ |
53.75 |
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
– |
|
|
– |
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
802 |
|
$ |
53.75 |
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information set forth under the caption “Information Regarding
Beneficial Ownership of Principal Shareholders, Directors, and Management” of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information set forth under the captions
“Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” of the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
Part IV
Item 14
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Financial Statements
and Schedules
The financial statements are set forth under Item 8 of this report on Form 10-K. Financial statement schedules have been omitted since they are
either not required, not applicable, or the information is otherwise included.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company filed no reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2002.
(c) Exhibit Listing
| Exhibit
Number |
|
Description |
| 3.1 |
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Microsoft Corporation (1) |
| 3.2 |
|
Bylaws of Microsoft Corporation |
| 10.1 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 2001 Stock Plan (2) |
| 10.2 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 1991 Stock Option Plan (3) |
| 10.3 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 1981 Stock Option Plan (4) |
| 10.4 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (5) |
| 10.5 |
|
Microsoft Corporation Stock Option Plan for Consultants and Advisors |
| 10.6 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (6) |
| 10.7 |
|
Microsoft Corporation Savings Plus Plan (7) |
| 10.8 |
|
Trust Agreement dated June 1, 1993 between Microsoft Corporation and First Interstate Bank of Washington |
| 10.9 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement |
| 10.10 |
|
Resignation Agreement between Richard Belluzzo and Microsoft Corporation |
| 21. |
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant |
| 23. |
|
Independent Auditors’ Consent |
| 99.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
| 99.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999. |
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement 333-52-852 on Form S-8. |
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1997. |
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement 33-37623 on Form S-8. |
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement 333-91755 on Form S-8. |
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001. |
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2000. |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned; thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Redmond, State of Washington, on September 5, 2002.
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION |
| |
| By |
|
/S/ JOHN G. CONNORS |
|
|
|
| John G. Connors |
| Senior Vice President; Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of Registrant and in the capacities indicated on September 5, 2002.
| Signature |
|
Title |
| |
| /S/ WILLIAM H. GATES,
III
William H. Gates, III |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Software Architect |
| |
| /S/ STEVEN A.
BALLMER
Steven A. Ballmer |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
| |
| /S/ JAMES I. CASH,
JR.
James I. Cash, Jr. |
|
Director |
| |
| /S/ RAYMOND V.
GILMARTIN
Raymond V. Gilmartin |
|
Director |
| |
| /S/ ANN MCLAUGHLIN
KOROLOGOS
Ann McLaughlin Korologos |
|
Director |
| |
| /S/ DAVID F.
MARQUARDT
David F. Marquardt |
|
Director |
| |
| /S/ WM. G. REED,
JR.
Wm. G. Reed, Jr. |
|
Director |
| |
| /S/ JON A.
SHIRLEY
Jon A. Shirley |
|
Director |
| |
| /S/ JOHN G.
CONNORS
John G. Connors |
|
Senior Vice President; Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
I, Steven A. Ballmer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Microsoft Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this
annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this annual report; and
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
Date: September 5, 2002
/S/ STEVEN A.
BALLMER
Steven A. Ballmer
Chief Executive Officer
I, John G. Connors, certify that:
1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Microsoft Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
Date: September 5, 2002
/S/ JOHN G. CONNORS
John G. Connors
Chief Financial Officer
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
| Exhibit
Number |
|
Description |
| 3.1 |
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Microsoft Corporation (1) |
| 3.2 |
|
Bylaws of Microsoft Corporation |
| 10.1 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 2001 Stock Plan (2) |
| 10.2 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 1991 Stock Option Plan (3) |
| 10.3 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 1981 Stock Option Plan (4) |
| 10.4 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (5) |
| 10.5 |
|
Microsoft Corporation Stock Option Plan for Consultants and Advisors |
| 10.6 |
|
Microsoft Corporation 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (6) |
| 10.7 |
|
Microsoft Corporation Savings Plus Plan (7) |
| 10.8 |
|
Trust Agreement dated June 1, 1993 between Microsoft Corporation and First Interstate Bank of Washington |
| 10.9 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement |
| 10.10 |
|
Resignation Agreement between Richard Belluzzo and Microsoft Corporation |
| 21. |
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant |
| 23. |
|
Independent Auditors’ Consent |
| 99.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
| 99.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1999. |
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement 333-52-852 on Form S-8. |
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1997. |
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement 33-37623 on Form S-8. |
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement 333-91755 on Form S-8. |
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2001. |
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K For The Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2000. |