UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY | REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: March 2, 2003
¨ TRANSITION | REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission file number 1-8738
SEALY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
36-3284147 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
Sealy Drive One Office Parkway Trinity, North Carolina |
27370 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
(336) 861-3500
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
The number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2003 was 31,255,742.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1Financial Statements
SEALY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Quarter Ended March 2, 2003 |
Quarter Ended March 3, 2002 |
|||||||
Net salesNon-affiliates |
$ |
277,403 |
|
$ |
253,184 |
| ||
Net salesAffiliates (Note 11) |
|
10,908 |
|
|
38,589 |
| ||
Total net sales |
|
288,311 |
|
|
291,773 |
| ||
Cost of goods soldNon-affiliates |
|
159,465 |
|
|
143,961 |
| ||
Cost of goods soldAffiliates (Note 11) |
|
5,890 |
|
|
21,049 |
| ||
Total cost of goods sold |
|
165,355 |
|
|
165,010 |
| ||
Gross Profit |
|
122,956 |
|
|
126,763 |
| ||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
92,657 |
|
|
93,686 |
| ||
Stock based compensation |
|
540 |
|
|
574 |
| ||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
260 |
|
|
173 |
| ||
Royalty income, net |
|
(2,713 |
) |
|
(2,487 |
) | ||
Income from operations |
|
32,212 |
|
|
34,817 |
| ||
Interest expense |
|
17,077 |
|
|
19,256 |
| ||
Other (income) expense, net (Note 5) |
|
(296 |
) |
|
1,216 |
| ||
Income before income tax expense |
|
15,431 |
|
|
14,345 |
| ||
Income tax expense |
|
6,338 |
|
|
5,899 |
| ||
Net income |
|
9,093 |
|
|
8,446 |
| ||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
|
5,114 |
|
|
4,640 |
| ||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ |
3,979 |
|
$ |
3,806 |
| ||
Earnings per shareBasic: |
||||||||
Net incomeBasic |
|
0.29 |
|
|
0.27 |
| ||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
(0.15 |
) | ||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
| ||
Earnings per shareDiluted: |
||||||||
Net incomeDiluted |
|
0.29 |
|
|
0.27 |
| ||
Liquidation preference for common L & M shares |
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
(0.15 |
) | ||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
| ||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
|
31,175 |
|
|
30,751 |
| ||
Diluted |
|
31,200 |
|
|
30,775 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
SEALY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
March 2, 2003 |
December 1, 2002* |
|||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
15,253 |
|
$ |
27,443 |
| ||
Accounts receivableNon-affiliates, net |
|
200,780 |
|
|
164,742 |
| ||
Accounts receivableAffiliates, net (Note 11) |
|
4,624 |
|
|
3,753 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
54,317 |
|
|
53,387 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses, deferred taxes and other current assets |
|
40,314 |
|
|
42,698 |
| ||
|
315,288 |
|
|
292,023 |
| |||
Property, plant and equipmentat cost |
|
285,383 |
|
|
280,626 |
| ||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
(112,009 |
) |
|
(106,701 |
) | ||
|
173,374 |
|
|
173,925 |
| |||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
|
377,787 |
|
|
374,946 |
| ||
Other intangibles, net |
|
5,085 |
|
|
5,078 |
| ||
Long-term notes receivable (Note 11) |
|
12,022 |
|
|
12,022 |
| ||
Investments in and advances to affiliates (Note 11) |
|
12,950 |
|
|
12,950 |
| ||
Debt issuance costs, net, and other assets |
|
36,470 |
|
|
34,004 |
| ||
|
444,314 |
|
|
439,000 |
| |||
$ |
932,976 |
|
$ |
904,948 |
| |||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
$ |
41,487 |
|
$ |
33,338 |
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
78,014 |
|
|
69,090 |
| ||
Accrued interest |
|
11,265 |
|
|
14,263 |
| ||
Accrued incentives and advertising |
|
50,334 |
|
|
41,530 |
| ||
Accrued compensation |
|
13,964 |
|
|
24,482 |
| ||
Other accrued expenses |
|
46,298 |
|
|
43,497 |
| ||
|
241,362 |
|
|
226,200 |
| |||
Long-term obligations, net |
|
720,500 |
|
|
719,896 |
| ||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
49,215 |
|
|
46,805 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
23,357 |
|
|
27,787 |
| ||
Stockholders (deficit) equity: |
||||||||
Common stock |
|
323 |
|
|
321 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
146,225 |
|
|
146,140 |
| ||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(210,673 |
) |
|
(219,766 |
) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(24,269 |
) |
|
(29,371 |
) | ||
Common stock held in treasury, at cost |
|
(13,064 |
) |
|
(13,064 |
) | ||
|
(101,458 |
) |
|
(115,740 |
) | |||
$ |
932,976 |
|
$ |
904,948 |
| |||
* | Condensed from audited financial statements. |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
SEALY CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Quarter Ended |
||||||||
March 2, 2003 |
March 3, 2002 |
|||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
$ |
(15,712 |
) |
$ |
26,548 |
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net |
|
(2,316 |
) |
|
(3,444 |
) | ||
Advances to affiliate |
|
|
|
|
(12,500 |
) | ||
Purchase of business, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
(186 |
) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(2,316 |
) |
|
(16,130 |
) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Treasury stock repurchase, including direct expenses |
|
|
|
|
(801 |
) | ||
Proceeds from long-term obligations, net |
|
6,912 |
|
|
2,105 |
| ||
Equity issuances |
|
87 |
|
|
316 |
| ||
Debt issuance costs |
|
(1,161 |
) |
|
|
| ||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
5,838 |
|
|
1,620 |
| ||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(12,190 |
) |
|
12,038 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
||||||||
Beginning of period |
|
27,443 |
|
|
12,010 |
| ||
End of period |
$ |
15,253 |
|
$ |
24,048 |
| ||
Supplemental disclosures: |
||||||||
Selected noncash items: |
||||||||
Non-cash compensation |
$ |
540 |
|
$ |
574 |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
5,668 |
|
|
5,431 |
| ||
Non-cash interest expense associated with: |
||||||||
Junior Subordinated Notes |
|
1,357 |
|
|
1,220 |
| ||
Debt issuance costs |
|
1,396 |
|
|
1,005 |
| ||
Discount on Senior Subordinated Notes, net |
|
483 |
|
|
3,017 |
| ||
Net interest (income) expense associated with interest rate swap and cap agreements |
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Three Months Ended March 2, 2003
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited, and certain information and footnote disclosures related thereto normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared following the same policies and procedures used in the preparation of the audited financial statements and reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of Sealy Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company). The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 1, 2002.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures on contingent assets and liabilities at quarter end and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The Company regularly assesses all of its long-lived assets and investments for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company believes no such impairment exists at March 2, 2003.
Certain reclassifications of previously reported financial information were made to conform to the 2003 presentation.
Note 2: Inventories
The major components of inventories were as follows:
March 2, 2003 |
December 1, 2002 | |||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Raw materials |
$ |
26,733 |
$ |
26,512 | ||
Work in process |
|
18,237 |
|
18,208 | ||
Finished goods |
|
9,347 |
|
8,667 | ||
$ |
54,317 |
$ |
53,387 | |||
Note 3: Warranty Costs
The Company has warranty obligations in connection with the sale of its product. The warranty period for Sealy Posturepedic, Stearns & Foster, Bassett and other Sealy branded products is a 10 year non-prorated warranty service period. The costs incurred to provide for these warranty obligations are estimated and recorded
5
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
as an accrued liability at the time of sale. The Company estimates its warranty cost at the point of sale based on historical rates. The change in the companys accrued warranty obligations from December 1, 2002 to March 2, 2003 was as follows:
March 2, 2003 |
||||
(in thousands) |
||||
Accrued warranty obligations at December 1, 2002 |
$ |
9,538 |
| |
Warranty claims |
|
(2,365 |
) | |
2003 warranty provisions |
|
2,490 |
| |
Accrued warranty obligations at March 2, 2003 |
$ |
9,663 |
| |
Note 4: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The Company performs an annual assessment of its indefinite-lived goodwill for impairment as of the beginning of the fiscal fourth quarter. The Company also assesses its indefinite-lived goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable from future cash flows.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the three months ended March 2, 2003, are as follows:
Balance as of December 1, 2002 |
$ |
374.9 | |
Increase due to foreign currency translation |
|
2.9 | |
Balance as of March 2, 2003 |
$ |
377.8 | |
Total other intangibles of $5.1 million (net of accumulated amortization of $13.6 million) as of March 2, 2003 primarily consist of acquired licenses, which are amortized on the straight-line method over periods ranging from 5 to 15 years.
Note 5: Other (Income) Expense, Net
The Company previously contributed cash and other assets to Mattress Holdings International LLC (MHI), a company which was controlled by the Companys largest stockholder, Bain Capital LLC, in exchange for a non-voting interest. The equity ownership of MHI was transferred to the Company in November 2002. MHI acquired a minority interest in Malachi Mattress America, Inc. (Malachi), a domestic mattress retailer in 1999. In October 2002, MHI acquired substantially all of the remaining interest in Malachi and sold 100% of its interest to an independent third party. The Malachi investment was accounted for by MHI under the equity method. Accordingly, the Company recorded equity in the losses of Malachi of $2.5 million for the three months ended March 3, 2002. See Note 11 for further discussion.
Additionally, Other (income) expense, net includes interest income of $0.3 million and $1.1 million for the quarters ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002, respectively.
Other (income) expense, net also includes $(0.2) million for minority interest associated with the Argentina operations for the three months ended March 3, 2002. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company acquired the remaining 30% interest of the Argentina operations and no longer records minority interest.
6
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Note 6: Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued FAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and supercedes Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The Statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost, as defined in EITF 94-3, was recognized at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal plan. This Statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this Statement did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued FAS 148, Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure, an amendment of FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The transition guidance and annual disclosure provisions are effective for the Companys second quarter and year ended 2003, respectively. This statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of FAS 123 to require more prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements regarding the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this Statement will have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtness of Othersan interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and a recission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made regarding obligations under certain issued guarantees by a guarantor in interim and annual financial statements. It also clarifies the requirement of a guarantor to recognize a liability at the inception of the guarantee at the fair value of the obligation. FIN 45 does not provide specific guidance for subsequently measuring the guarantors recognized liability over the term of the guarantee. The provisions relating to the initial recognition and measurement of a liability are applicable on a prospective basis for guarantees issued or modified subsequent to December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are effective for interim and annual financial statements for periods ending after December 15, 2002, the Companys first quarter of fiscal 2003. The Company adopted the provisions of this statement effective December 2, 2002 and it did not have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
The FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. The primary objectives of FIN 46 are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (variable interest entities or VIEs) and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate the VIE (the primary beneficiary). This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (1) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest or (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entitys activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. FIN 46 is effective for the Companys 2nd quarter of 2003 with transitional disclosure required with these financial statements. The Company will adopt these provisions in its 2nd quarter, however the Company does not believe it is a primary beneficiary of a VIE or holds any significant interests or involvement in a VIE and does not expect there to be an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
7
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
The Emerging Issues Task Force of the FASB released Issue 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or a Reseller of the Vendors Product to provide guidance primarily on income statement classification of consideration from a vendor to a purchaser of the vendors products, including both customers and consumers. Generally, cash consideration is to be classified as a reduction of revenue, unless specific criteria are met regarding goods or services that the vendor may receive in return for this consideration. The Company has historically classified certain costs such as volume rebates, promotional money and amortization of supply agreements covered by the provisions of EITF 01-09 as marketing and selling expenses which are recorded in selling, general and administrative in the Statement of Operations. The Company adopted EITF 01-09 effective March 4, 2002, the first day of our fiscal second quarter of 2002, and reclassified previous period amounts to comply with the consensus. As a result of the adoption, both net sales and selling, general and administrative expenses were reduced $11.6 million and $9.1 million for the three months ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002, respectively. These changes did not affect the Companys financial position or results of operations.
Note 7: Hedging Strategy
In 2000, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $234.5 million of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis through December 2006, thereby hedging against the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense (forecasted cash flows). Use of hedging contracts allows the Company to reduce its overall exposure to interest rate changes, since gains and losses on these contracts will offset losses and gains on the transactions being hedged. The Company formally documents all hedged transactions and hedging instruments, and assesses, both at inception of the contract and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging instruments are effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged transaction. The fair values of the interest rate agreements are estimated by obtaining quotes from brokers and are the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into consideration current interest rates and the current creditworthiness of the counterparties. Effective June 3, 2002, the Company dedesignated the interest rate swap agreement for hedge accounting. As a result of the dedesignation, $12.9 million previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of the date of dedesignation is being amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the interest rate swap agreement. For the three months ended March 2, 2003, $1.0 million was amortized into interest expense. Prior to June 3, 2002, the changes in the fair market value of the interest rate swap were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Subsequent to June 3, 2002, changes in the fair market value of the interest rate swap are recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended March 2, 2003, $4.7 million was recorded as interest expense as a result of the change in its fair market value. At March 2, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of this instrument was $(22.4) million and $(20.2) million, respectively, which is recorded as follows:
March 2, 2003 |
December 1, 2002 | |||||
(in millions) | ||||||
Accrued interest |
$ |
2.4 |
$ |
2.1 | ||
Other accrued expenses |
|
8.2 |
|
7.6 | ||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
11.8 |
|
10.5 | ||
$ |
22.4 |
$ |
20.2 | |||
During the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into another interest rate swap agreement that has the effect of reestablishing as floating rate debt the $234.5 million of debt previously converted to fixed rate debt through December 2006. This interest rate swap agreement has not been designated for hedge accounting and,
8
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
accordingly, any changes in the fair value are to be recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended March 2, 2003, $4.6 million was recorded as a reduction of interest expense as a result of the change in its fair market value. At March 2, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of this instrument was $11.0 million and $7.8 million with $4.8 million and $5.1 million recorded in prepaid expense and other current assets and $6.2 million and $2.7 million recorded in noncurrent assets, respectively.
The Company also entered into an interest rate cap agreement during the second quarter of 2002 with a notional amount of $175.0 million that caps the LIBOR rate on which the floating rate debt is based at 8% through December 2006. This agreement has not been designated for hedge accounting and, accordingly, any changes in the fair value are recorded in interest expense. The Company recorded $4 thousand additional interest expense for the three months ended March 2, 2003. At March 2, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of this instrument, which is included in noncurrent assets, was an asset of $24 thousand and $29 thousand, respectively.
At March 2, 2003 and December 1, 2002, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) associated with the interest rate swaps was $(9.9) million and $(10.9) million, respectively.
To protect against the reduction in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from purchases in a foreign currency, the Company has instituted a forecasted cash flow hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its purchases denominated in foreign currencies with forward and option contracts. At March 2, 2003, the Company had forward contracts to sell a total of 19.4 million Mexican pesos with an expiration date of May 28, 2003, forward contracts to sell a total of 10.8 million Canadian dollars with expiration dates ranging from March 19, 2003 through May 15, 2003 and an option contract to sell a total of 4.9 million Canadian dollars with expiration dates ranging from May 21, 2003 through July 23, 2003.
Note 8: Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands) for the quarter ended:
March 2, 2003 |
March 3, 2002 | |||||
Numerator: |
||||||
Net income |
|
9,093 |
|
8,446 | ||
Liquidation preference for L & M shares |
|
5,114 |
|
4,640 | ||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ |
3,979 |
$ |
3,806 | ||
Denominator: |
||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per shareweighted average shares |
|
31,175 |
|
30,751 | ||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||
Stock options |
|
25 |
|
24 | ||
Denominator for diluted earnings per shareadjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions |
|
31,200 |
|
30,775 | ||
Note 9: Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income for the quarters ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002 was $14.2 million and $8.0 million, respectively.
9
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
Activity in Stockholders equity (deficit) is as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
Comprehensive Income |
Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Accumulated Deficit |
Treasury Stock |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 1, 2002 |
$ |
321 |
$ |
146,140 |
$ |
(219,766 |
) |
$ |
(13,064 |
) |
$ |
(29,371 |
) |
$ |
(115,740 |
) | |||||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the three months ended March 2, 2003 |
$ |
9,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,093 |
| |||||||
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
2 |
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
| |||||||
Amortization of dedesignated cash flow hedge |
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
1,010 |
| |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
4,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,092 |
|
|
4,092 |
| |||||||
Balance at March 2, 2003 |
$ |
14,195 |
$ |
323 |
$ |
146,225 |
$ |
(210,673 |
) |
$ |
(13,064 |
) |
$ |
(24,269 |
) |
$ |
(101,458 |
) | |||||||
Note 10: Contingencies
The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims, and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is currently conducting an environmental cleanup at a formerly owned facility in South Brunswick, New Jersey pursuant to the New Jersey Industrial Site Recovery Act. The Company and one of its subsidiaries are parties to an Administrative Consent Order issued by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Pursuant to that order, the Company and its subsidiary agreed to conduct soil and groundwater remediation at the property. The Company does not believe that its manufacturing processes were the source of contamination. The Company sold the property in 1997. The Company and its subsidiary retained primary responsibility for the required remediation. The Company has completed essentially all soil remediation with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection approval, and has concluded a pilot test of the groundwater remediation system. The Company is working with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to develop a remediation plan for the sediment in Oakeys Brook adjoining the site.
The Company is also remediating soil and groundwater contamination at an inactive facility located in Oakville, Connecticut. Although the Company is conducting the remediation voluntarily, it obtained Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection approval of the remediation plan. The Company has completed essentially all soil remediation under the remediation plan and is currently monitoring groundwater at the site. The Company believes the contamination is attributable to the manufacturing operations of previous unaffiliated occupants of the facility.
The Company removed three underground storage tanks previously used for diesel, gasoline, and waste oil from its South Gate, California facility in March 1994 and remediated the soil in the area. Since August 1998, the Company has been working with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region to monitor ground water at the site.
10
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
While the Company cannot predict the ultimate timing or costs of the South Brunswick, Oakville, and South Gate environmental matters, based on facts currently known, the Company believes that the accruals recorded are adequate and does not believe the resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the financial position or future operations of the Company; however, in the event of an adverse decision, these matters could have a material adverse effect.
Note 11: Related Party Transactions
The Company previously contributed cash and other assets to Mattress Holdings International LLC (MHI), a company which was controlled by the Companys largest stockholder, Bain Capital LLC, in exchange for a non-voting interest. MHI was formed to invest in domestic and international loans, advances and investments in joint ventures, licensees and retailers. The equity ownership of MHI was transferred from Bain to the Company in November 2002. MHI acquired in 1999 a minority interest in Malachi Mattress America, Inc. (Malachi), a domestic mattress retailer, and indirectly, through a Bain controlled holding company, acquired a minority interest in Mattress Holdings Corporation (MHC). MHC owns an interest in Mattress Discounters Corporation, a domestic mattress retailer, and the common stock of an international mattress retailer.
In October 2002, Mattress Discounters Corporation filed a voluntary joint petition with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and was operating as a debtor in possession under the Bankruptcy Code. Effective March 14, 2003, Mattress Discounters emerged from bankruptcy. At the time Mattress Discounters filed for bankruptcy protection, the Company had recorded in its financial statements a $12.5 million participation in Mattress Discounters banking facility and $16.0 million in trade receivables. The Company had fully-reserved the trade receivables. As part of the approved bankruptcy settlement, the Company received a non-controlling minority interest in Mattress Discounters and a $12.9 million secured note, guaranteed by MHC. Other entities affiliated with Bain Capital LLC also received a minority interest in Mattress Discounters. During the bankruptcy period, Mattress Discounters exited four markets. The majority of the stores in the exited markets were acquired by current Sealy customers. The Company and Mattress Discounters also amended the existing long-term supply agreement to remove the requirement for Sealy to be Mattress Discounters exclusive supplier. The Company does not believe that any sales reductions, as a result of the amended supply agreement or the markets exited, will have a material adverse effect on the profitability of the Company. The Company had sales to Mattress Discounters of $8.1 million and $17.8 million for the three months ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002, respectively, which are shown in the statement of operations as sales to affiliates. At March 2, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the Company had extended net trade credit to Mattress Discounters of $3.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As of March 2, 2003, Mattress Discounters is paying within terms specified in the debtor in possession financing agreement.
In October 2002, MHI acquired substantially all of the remaining interest in Malachi. Concurrent with the acquisition, MHI sold 100% of its interest in Malachi to an independent third party, canceled $21.7 million in trade receivables all of which were fully reserved, received a $17.5 million long-term note with an estimated fair value of $8.8 million, due and payable on June 29, 2009, and Malachis name was changed to Mattress Firm, Inc. MHI also loaned Mattress Firm, Inc. $3.3 million secured by all of its assets. Both the note and the loan are recorded in Long-term notes receivable in the balance sheet. The Companys net exposure at March 2, 2003 and December 1, 2002 was $19.6 million and $19.5 million, respectively. The Company believes that the recent operating performance of Mattress Firm, Inc. has improved. In addition, the current owners at the time of the transaction made additional cash infusions in the business and improved its overall capital structure. The Company has been receiving timely payments on its outstanding receivables assumed by Mattress Firm. Based on this, the Company believes that it has adequate reserves against its current exposure. The Company will, however, continue to monitor this business to determine whether reserve levels are appropriate. Concurrent with
11
SEALY CORPORATION
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements(Continued)
the transactions, the Company entered into a new long-term, non-exclusive supply agreement with Mattress Firm, Inc. through November 1, 2008 which replaced an exclusive supply agreement. The Company does not expect that any sales reduction as a result of the amended supply agreement will have a material adverse effect on the profitability of the Company. As a result of the transactions previously described, Mattress Firm, Inc. is no longer an affiliate of Bain Capital LLC or Sealy and sales since the date of the transactions are shown in the statement of operations as sales to non-affiliates. The Company also had sales to Malachi of $17.8 million for the three months ended March 3, 2002 which is included in the statement of operations as sales to affiliates.
The Company also had sales of $2.8 million and $3.1 million for the three months ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002, respectively, to the international affiliate that is owned by Mattress Holdings Corporation.
The Company believes that the terms on which mattresses are supplied to these affiliates are not materially more or less favorable than those that might reasonably be obtained in a comparable transaction on an arms length basis from a person that is not an affiliate or related party.
Note 12: Segment Information
The Company operates predominately in one industry segment, that being the manufacture and marketing of conventional bedding.
Note 13: Subsequent Event
On April 15, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sell to MHC its $12.9 million long-term note receivable (book value of $12.5 million) from Mattress Discounters Corporation, all of its rights to the equity in Mattress Discounters to be received as part of the bankruptcy settlement and its interest in MHC. As a result, upon closing of these transactions, the Company will receive approximately $13.6 million in cash and expects to recognize a gain on the sale of approximately $0.7 million before transaction related expenses. Upon consummation, the Company will no longer have any direct interest in Mattress Discounters other than trade receivables in the normal course of business.
Concurrent with the above transaction, Mattress Holdings Corporation also sold 100% of its interest in the other international mattress retailer previously identified (See Note 11) and such retailer will no longer be an affiliate of the Company.
Note 14: Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Financial Information
The Parent and each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries has fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, the obligation to pay principal and interest with respect to the Senior Subordinated and Senior Subordinated Discount Notes (the Notes) of Sealy Mattress Company (the Issuer). Substantially all of the Issuers operating income and cash flow is generated by its subsidiaries. As a result, funds necessary to meet the Issuers debt service obligations are provided in part by distributions or advances from its subsidiaries. Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, as well as the financial condition and operating requirements of the Issuers subsidiaries, could limit the Issuers ability to obtain cash from its subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting its debt service obligations, including the payment of principal and interest on the Notes. Although holders of the Notes will be direct creditors of the Issuers principal direct subsidiaries by virtue of the guarantees, the Issuer has subsidiaries (Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries) that are not included among the Guarantor Subsidiaries, and such subsidiaries will not be obligated with respect to the Notes. As a result, the claims of creditors of the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries will effectively have priority with respect to the assets and earnings of such companies over the claims of creditors of the Issuer, including the holders of the Notes.
12
The following supplemental consolidating condensed financial statements present:
1. | Consolidating condensed balance sheets as of March 2, 2003 and December 1, 2002, consolidating condensed statements of operations and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002. |
2. | Sealy Corporation (the Parent and a guarantor), Sealy Mattress Company (the Issuer), combined Guarantor Subsidiaries and combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries with their investments in subsidiaries accounted for using the equity method. |
3. | Elimination entries necessary to consolidate the Parent and all of its subsidiaries. |
Separate financial statements of each of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not presented because management believes that these financial statements would not be material to investors.
13
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheet
March 2, 2003
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
$ |
11,166 |
|
$ |
4,056 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
15,253 |
| ||||||
Accounts receivableNon-affiliates, net |
|
12 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
150,447 |
|
|
50,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
200,780 |
| ||||||
Accounts receivableAffiliates, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
1,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,624 |
| ||||||
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
1,821 |
|
|
35,133 |
|
|
17,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
54,317 |
| ||||||
Prepaids and deferred taxes |
|
(97 |
) |
|
5,218 |
|
|
24,992 |
|
|
10,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
40,314 |
| ||||||
|
(85 |
) |
|
7,073 |
|
|
224,975 |
|
|
83,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
315,288 |
| |||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
6,121 |
|
|
224,626 |
|
|
54,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
285,383 |
| ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
(3,067 |
) |
|
(99,187 |
) |
|
(9,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(112,009 |
) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
125,439 |
|
|
44,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
173,374 |
| |||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net |
|
|
|
|
14,816 |
|
|
314,698 |
|
|
48,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
377,787 |
| ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,617 |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,085 |
| ||||||
Net investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries |
|
(49,039 |
) |
|
604,270 |
|
|
(357,356 |
) |
|
(106,069 |
) |
|
(91,806 |
) |
|
|
| ||||||
Investment in and advances to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,950 |
| ||||||
Long-term notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,022 |
| ||||||
Debt issuance costs, net and other assets |
|
108 |
|
|
24,487 |
|
|
9,858 |
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
36,470 |
| ||||||
|
(48,931 |
) |
|
643,573 |
|
|
(29,183 |
) |
|
(29,339 |
) |
|
(91,806 |
) |
|
444,314 |
| |||||||
Total assets |
$ |
(49,016 |
) |
$ |
653,700 |
|
$ |
321,231 |
|
$ |
98,867 |
|
$ |
(91,806 |
) |
$ |
932,976 |
| ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
$ |
|
|
$ |
37,161 |
|
$ |
13 |
|
$ |
4,313 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
41,487 |
| ||||||
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
47,797 |
|
|
29,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
78,014 |
| ||||||
Accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
10,459 |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
11,265 |
| ||||||
Accrued incentives and advertising |
|
|
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
43,744 |
|
|
4,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
50,334 |
| ||||||
Accrued compensation |
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
9,730 |
|
|
4,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
13,964 |
| ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
|
89 |
|
|
9,417 |
|
|
29,275 |
|
|
7,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
46,298 |
| ||||||
|
89 |
|
|
49,892 |
|
|
141,018 |
|
|
50,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
241,362 |
| |||||||
Long-term obligations, net |
|
46,604 |
|
|
665,099 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
8,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
720,500 |
| ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
6,227 |
|
|
11,866 |
|
|
26,141 |
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
49,215 |
| ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
(478 |
) |
|
679 |
|
|
14,761 |
|
|
8,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,357 |
| ||||||
Stockholders (deficit) equity |
|
(101,458 |
) |
|
(73,836 |
) |
|
139,248 |
|
|
26,394 |
|
|
(91,806 |
) |
|
(101,458 |
) | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity |
$ |
(49,016 |
) |
$ |
653,700 |
|
$ |
321,231 |
|
$ |
98,867 |
|
$ |
(91,806 |
) |
$ |
932,976 |
| ||||||
14
SEALY COPRORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheet
December 1, 2002
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non- Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
21,881 |
|
$ |
5,534 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
27,443 |
| ||||||
Accounts receivableNon-affiliates, net |
|
11 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
115,141 |
|
|
49,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
164,742 |
| ||||||
Accounts receivableAffiliates, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
3,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,753 |
| ||||||
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
36,377 |
|
|
15,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
53,387 |
| ||||||
Prepaid expenses and deferred taxes |
|
(97 |
) |
|
5,557 |
|
|
29,490 |
|
|
7,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
42,698 |
| ||||||
|
(86 |
) |
|
7,102 |
|
|
203,309 |
|
|
81,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
292,023 |
| |||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
|
|
5,398 |
|
|
223,526 |
|
|
51,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
280,626 |
| ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
(2,517 |
) |
|
(95,568 |
) |
|
(8,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(106,701 |
) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
127,958 |
|
|
43,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
173,925 |
| |||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net |
|
|
|
|
14,816 |
|
|
314,698 |
|
|
45,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
374,946 |
| ||||||
Other intangibles, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,689 |
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,078 |
| ||||||
Net investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries |
|
(65,254 |
) |
|
590,852 |
|
|
(359,727 |
) |
|
(110,986 |
) |
|
(54,885 |
) |
|
|
| ||||||
Investment in and advances to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,950 |
| ||||||
Long-term notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
12,022 |
| ||||||
Debt issuance costs, net and other assets |
|
106 |
|
|
22,318 |
|
|
8,954 |
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
34,004 |
| ||||||
|
(65,148 |
) |
|
627,986 |
|
|
(32,386 |
) |
|
(36,567 |
) |
|
(54,885 |
) |
|
439,000 |
| |||||||
Total assets |
$ |
(65,234 |
) |
$ |
637,969 |
|
$ |
298,881 |
|
$ |
88,217 |
|
$ |
(54,885 |
) |
$ |
904,948 |
| ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
$ |
|
|
$ |
29,437 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
3,901 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
33,338 |
| ||||||
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
38,481 |
|
|
30,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
69,090 |
| ||||||
Accrued interest |
|
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
12,246 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
14,263 |
| ||||||
Accrued incentives and advertising |
|
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
35,468 |
|
|
5,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
41,530 |
| ||||||
Accrued compensation |
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
19,589 |
|
|
4,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,482 |
| ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
|
51 |
|
|
10,224 |
|
|
25,238 |
|
|
7,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
43,497 |
| ||||||
|
51 |
|
|
42,857 |
|
|
131,022 |
|
|
52,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
226,200 |
| |||||||
Long-term obligations, net |
|
45,246 |
|
|
672,340 |
|
|
63 |
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
719,896 |
| ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
5,687 |
|
|
10,442 |
|
|
25,593 |
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
46,805 |
| ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
|
(478 |
) |
|
679 |
|
|
19,582 |
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
27,787 |
| ||||||
Stockholders (deficit) equity |
|
(115,740 |
) |
|
(88,349 |
) |
|
122,621 |
|
|
20,613 |
|
|
(54,885 |
) |
|
(115,740 |
) | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders(deficit) equity |
$ |
(65,234 |
) |
$ |
637,969 |
|
$ |
298,881 |
|
$ |
88,217 |
|
$ |
(54,885 |
) |
$ |
904,948 |
| ||||||
15
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended March 2, 2003
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net salesNonAffiliates |
$ |
|
|
$ |
14,049 |
|
$ |
250,035 |
|
$ |
50,339 |
|
$ |
(37,020 |
) |
$ |
277,403 |
| ||||||
Net salesAffiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,148 |
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,908 |
| ||||||
Total net sales |
|
|
|
|
14,049 |
|
|
258,183 |
|
|
53,099 |
|
|
(37,020 |
) |
|
288,311 |
| ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods soldNon-affiliates |
|
|
|
|
9,752 |
|
|
155,399 |
|
|
31,334 |
|
|
(37,020 |
) |
|
159,465 |
| ||||||
Cost of goods soldaffiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,082 |
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
5,890 |
| ||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
|
9,752 |
|
|
159,481 |
|
|
33,142 |
|
|
(37,020 |
) |
|
165,355 |
| |||||||||
Gross Profit |
|
|
|
|
4,297 |
|
|
98,702 |
|
|
19,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
122,956 |
| ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
38 |
|
|
4,229 |
|
|
71,607 |
|
|
16,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
92,657 |
| ||||||
Stock based compensation |
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
| ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
260 |
| ||||||
Royalty income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,934 |
) |
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,713 |
) | ||||||
Income from operations |
|
(578 |
) |
|
68 |
|
|
29,957 |
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
32,212 |
| ||||||
Interest expense |
|
1,411 |
|
|
15,336 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
17,077 |
| ||||||
Other (income) expense |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(296 |
) | ||||||
Loss (income) from equity investees |
|
(9,411 |
) |
|
(9,953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,364 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loss (income) from nonguarantor equity investees |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
(1,092 |
) |
|
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Capital charge and intercompany interest allocation |
|
(1,449 |
) |
|
(14,519 |
) |
|
15,012 |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
8,872 |
|
|
9,104 |
|
|
16,128 |
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
(20,356 |
) |
|
15,431 |
| ||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
(221 |
) |
|
(307 |
) |
|
6,175 |
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,338 |
| ||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
9,093 |
|
$ |
9,411 |
|
$ |
9,953 |
|
$ |
992 |
|
$ |
(20,356 |
) |
$ |
9,093 |
| ||||||
16
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended March 3, 2002
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||
Net salesNonaffiliates |
$ |
|
|
$ |
11,768 |
|
$ |
197,369 |
|
$ |
46,476 |
|
$ |
(2,429 |
) |
$ |
253,184 |
| ||||||
Net salesAffiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,525 |
|
|
3,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
38,589 |
| ||||||
Total net sales |
|
|
|
|
11,768 |
|
|
232,894 |
|
|
49,540 |
|
|
(2,429 |
) |
|
291,773 |
| ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods soldNon-affiliates |
|
|
|
|
7,624 |
|
|
109,316 |
|
|
29,450 |
|
|
(2,429 |
) |
|
143,961 |
| ||||||
Cost of goods soldAffiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,885 |
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
21,049 |
| ||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
|
7,624 |
|
|
128,201 |
|
|
31,614 |
|
|
(2,429 |
) |
|
165,010 |
| |||||||||
Gross Profit |
|
|
|
|
4,144 |
|
|
104,693 |
|
|
17,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
126,763 |
| ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
|
45 |
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
76,460 |
|
|
14,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
93,686 |
| ||||||
Stock based compensation |
|
574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
574 |
| ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
| ||||||
Royalty income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,657 |
) |
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,487 |
) | ||||||
Income from operations |
|
(619 |
) |
|
1,435 |
|
|
30,818 |
|
|
3,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
34,817 |
| ||||||
Interest expense |
|
1,270 |
|
|
17,487 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,256 |
| ||||||
Other (income) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(801 |
) |
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,216 |
| ||||||
Loss (income) from equity investees |
|
(8,784 |
) |
|
(7,664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,448 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
Loss (income) from nonguarantor equity investees |
|
|
|
|
(938 |
) |
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
| ||||||
Capital charge and intercompany interest allocation |
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
(16,362 |
) |
|
16,767 |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
8,210 |
|
|
8,912 |
|
|
13,763 |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
(16,315 |
) |
|
14,345 |
| ||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
(236 |
) |
|
127 |
|
|
6,100 |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
5,899 |
| ||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
8,446 |
|
$ |
8,785 |
|
$ |
7,663 |
|
$ |
(133 |
) |
$ |
(16,315 |
) |
$ |
8,446 |
| ||||||
17
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 2, 2003
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(1,986 |
) |
$ |
(12,163 |
) |
$ |
(1,563 |
) |
$ |
|
$ |
(15,712 |
) | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
(2,132 |
) |
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,316 |
) | ||||||
Net activity in investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries |
|
(87 |
) |
|
3,195 |
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
(6,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
(87 |
) |
|
3,150 |
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
(6,814 |
) |
|
|
|
(2,316 |
) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from (payments on) long-term obligations, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
6,899 |
|
|
|
|
6,912 |
| ||||||
Equity issuances |
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
| ||||||
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
(1,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,161 |
) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
(87 |
) |
|
(1,161 |
) |
|
13 |
|
|
6,899 |
|
|
|
|
5,838 |
| ||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
(10,715 |
) |
|
(1,478 |
) |
|
|
|
(12,190 |
) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
21,881 |
|
|
5,534 |
|
|
|
|
27,443 |
| ||||||
End of period |
$ |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
$ |
11,166 |
|
$ |
4,056 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
15,253 |
| ||||||
18
SEALY CORPORATION
Supplemental Consolidating Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 3, 2002
(in thousands)
Sealy Corporation |
Sealy Mattress Company |
Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations |
Consolidated |
||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ |
|
|
$ |
(1,340 |
) |
$ |
22,054 |
|
$ |
5,834 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
26,548 |
| ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
(3,056 |
) |
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
|
(3,444 |
) | ||||||
Advances to affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,500 |
) |
|
|
|
(12,500 |
) | ||||||
Purchase of business, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
(186 |
) | ||||||
Net activity in investment in and advances to (from) subsidiaries |
|
485 |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
(10,785 |
) |
|
8,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
485 |
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
(13,841 |
) |
|
(4,465 |
) |
|
|
|
(16,130 |
) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock repurchase, including direct expenses |
|
(801 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(801 |
) | ||||||
Proceeds from (payments on) long-term obligations, net |
|
|
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
(53 |
) |
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
2,105 |
| ||||||
Equity issuances |
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316 |
| ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
(485 |
) |
|
(374 |
) |
|
(53 |
) |
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
|
1,620 |
| ||||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
8,160 |
|
|
3,901 |
|
|
|
|
12,038 |
| ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
6,442 |
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
|
12,010 |
| ||||||
End of period |
$ |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
$ |
14,602 |
|
$ |
9,414 |
|
$ |
|
$ |
24,048 |
| ||||||
19
SEALY CORPORATION
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Quarter Ended March 2, 2003 compared with Quarter Ended March 3, 2002
Net Sales. Net sales for the quarter ended March 2, 2003, were $288.3 million, a decrease of $3.5 million, or 1.2% from the quarter ended March 3, 2002. Net sales were reduced by $11.6 million and $9.1 million for the three months ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002, respectively, as a result of applying accounting guidance contained in EITF 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or a Reseller of the Vendors Product. Generally, cash consideration from a vendor to a purchaser of the vendors products, including both customers and consumers, is to be classified as a reduction of revenue, unless specific criteria are met regarding goods or services that the vendor may receive in return for this consideration. Total domestic sales were $233.8 million for the first quarter of 2003 compared to $241.1 million for the first quarter of 2002. The domestic sales decline of $7.3 million was attributable to a 4.6% decrease in volume, partially offset by a 1.6% increase in average unit selling price. Total international sales were $54.5 million in the first quarter of 2003 compared to $50.7 million in the first quarter of 2002. Growth of $3.8 million in the international operations was primarily attributable to growth in the European and South American operations. Current sales forecasts indicate that worldwide sales could be down 8% to 10% for the second quarter 2003 compared to the comparable period in 2002 primarily due to the softening of the economy and lower sales expected from Mattress Discounters and Mattress Firm as they restructure.
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold for the quarter, as a percentage of net sales, increased 0.8 percentage points to 57.4%. Cost of goods sold for the domestic business increased 1.2 percentage points to 56.2%. This increase is primarily due to higher variable costs associated with increased workers compensation, insurance and other fringe benefit expenses, lower absorption of fixed costs due to lower unit sales and costs associated with the shutdown of the Taylor facility in December. Cost of goods sold for the international business decreased 1.4 percentage points to 62.5%. This decrease is primarily due to lower material costs in the Canadian business.
Selling, General, Administrative. Selling, general, and administrative expense as a percent of sales was 32.1% for the quarters ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.0 million to $92.7 million compared to $93.7 million in 2002. This decrease was primarily due to lower promotional and advertising expenses and bad debt expenses, partially offset by higher product delivery costs and corporate overhead expenses.
Stock Based Compensation. The Company has an obligation to repurchase certain securities of the Company held by an officer at the greater of fair market value or original cost. The Company recorded a $0.5 million and $0.6 million charge during the quarters ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002, respectively, to revalue this obligation to reflect an increase in the fair market value of the securities.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased $2.2 million due to lower effective interest rates and lower average debt levels. In 2000, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $234.5 million of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis through December 2006. In the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into another interest rate swap agreement that has the effect of reestablishing as floating rate debt the $234.5 million of debt previously converted to fixed rate debt through December 2006. The Company is required under its credit agreements to hedge at least 50% of its floating rate term debt.
Income Tax. The Companys effective income tax rates in 2003 and 2002 differ from the Federal statutory rate principally because of the effect of certain foreign tax rate differentials, state and local income taxes and the application of purchase accounting in 2002. The Companys effective tax rate for the quarters ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002 is approximately 41.1%.
20
New Sealy Product Launch
The Company annually invests significantly in research and development to improve its product offerings. Starting in June 2003, the Company will launch an entirely new line of mattresses and box-springs for its Sealy Posturepedic brand. All Sealy Posturepedic brand mattresses will be manufactured with a UniCased Construction utilizing new proprietary processes and materials incorporated into a single-sided design. The Company expects to incur increased costs in the second and third quarters associated with the introduction of the new product and the training of plant personnel in the new manufacturing processes. The Company does not expect the increased costs to materially affect long-term operating trends.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys principal sources of funds are cash flows from operations and borrowings under its Revolving Credit Facility. The Companys principal use of funds consists of payments of principal and interest on its Senior Credit Agreements, capital expenditures and interest payments on its outstanding Notes. Capital expenditures totaled $2.4 million for the three months ended March 2, 2003. The Company expects 2003 capital expenditures to be approximately $26.0 million. Management believes that annual capital expenditure limitations in its current debt agreements will not significantly inhibit the Company from meeting its ongoing capital needs. At March 2, 2003, the Company had approximately $34.1 million available under its Revolving Credit Facility including Letters of Credit issued totaling approximately $15.9 million. The Companys net weighted average borrowing cost was 8.9% and 9.1% for the three months ended March 2, 2003 and March 3, 2002, respectively. The Companys average interest rate has been positively impacted by the Companys interest rate derivatives as the Companys interest rate derivatives have effectively offset each other to reestablish the floating rate debt during a period of declining interest rates.
The Companys cash flow from operations decreased $42.2 million from $26.5 million for the three months ended March 3, 2002 to $(15.7) million for the three months ended March 2, 2003. This decrease in operating cash flows is primarily the result of slower cash collections on customer accounts receivable. The Company also made significant payments in the first quarter associated with incentive compensation that were not made in the first quarter of 2002. The Company also experienced difficulties in an accounts receivable system conversion in the fourth quarter of 2002. These issues resulted principally in delays of processing of certain transactions and the Company also experienced deterioration in the aging of trade receivables. As a result, the Company increased its allowance for doubtful accounts $6.1 million in the fourth quarter. The Company has taken remedial actions to address these issues and does not believe that there will be a material adverse affect on its liquidity and cash flow. While the Company does not believe any further provisions for doubtful accounts are necessary, the Company will continue to monitor remedial actions to ensure that the allowance is adequate and to improve future cash collections.
Cash used in investing activities decreased approximately $13.8 million for 2002. During the first quarter of 2002, the Company advanced $12.5 million to Mattress Discounters Corporation. No such investments or advances were made during the first quarter of 2003.
Cash flow provided by financing activities increased $4.2 million from the first quarter 2003 when compared to the first quarter 2002. During the first quarter of 2003, the Company borrowed $6.8 million on its Canadian revolver to help fund operating activities, partially offset by cash payments on previously accrued debt issuance costs associated with the refinancing of the Revolving Credit Facility in November 2002.
The Companys ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or to pay the interest or liquidated damages, if any, on, or to refinance our indebtedness, or to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on the Companys future performance, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond the Companys control. Based upon the current level of operations and certain anticipated improvements, the Company believes that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with available borrowings under the senior credit agreement, will be adequate to meet the
21
future liquidity needs throughout 2003. The Companys long-term obligations contain various financial tests and covenants. The Company was in compliance with such covenants as of the quarter ended March 2, 2003. The most restrictive covenants relate to ratios of adjusted EBITDA to interest coverage and total debt to adjusted EBITDA all as defined in the agreements. Those ratios change under the agreement over time and are less restrictive in 2003 versus those at the end of 2002. The Company does not foresee an inability to meet such covenants in 2003. The Company will, however, need to refinance all or a portion of the principal of the notes on or prior to maturity. In 1997, under the terms of the Companys Senior Subordinated Note Agreement, the Company issued $128.0 million at a substantial discount from their principal amount at maturity. From the date of issuance until December 15, 2002 no interest was accrued or paid. On December 16, 2002 the Company started accruing interest with payment to be made semi-annually in June and December. Cash interest payments will increase approximately $13.3 million during 2003. Management believes that the Company will have the necessary liquidity through cash flow from operations, and availability under the Revolving Credit Facility for the next several years to fund its expected capital expenditures, obligations under its credit agreement and subordinated note indentures, environmental liabilities, and for other needs required to manage and operate its business. The Companys scheduled principal payments on its borrowings will increase by approximately $44.1 million from 2003 to 2004. There can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, that anticipated revenue growth and operating improvements will be realized or that future borrowings will be available under the senior credit agreements in an amount sufficient to enable the Company to service its indebtedness, including the notes, or to fund other liquidity needs. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to effect any such refinancing on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
The Companys customers include furniture stores, national mass merchandisers, specialty sleep shops, department stores, contract customers and other stores. In the future, these retailers may consolidate, undergo restructurings or reorganizations, or realign their affiliations, any of which could decrease the number of stores that carry our products. These retailers are also subject to changes in consumer spending and the overall state of the economy both domestically and internationally. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition or results of operations.
Forward Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Report Act of 1995. Although the Company believes its plans are based upon reasonable assumptions as of the current date, it can give no assurances that such expectations can be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Companys expectations include: general business and economic conditions, competitive factors, raw materials pricing, and fluctuations in demand.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Information relative to the Companys market risk sensitive instruments by major category at December 1, 2002 is presented under Item 7a of the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 1, 2002.
Foreign Currency Exposures
The Companys earnings are affected by fluctuations in the value of its subsidiaries functional currency as compared to the currencies of its foreign denominated purchases. Foreign currency forward, swap and option contracts are used to hedge against the earnings effects of such fluctuations. The result of a uniform 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to currencies of countries in which the Company manufactures or sells its products would not be material to earnings or financial position. This calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the U.S. dollar.
22
Interest Rate Risk
In 2000, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively converted $234.5 million of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis through December 2006, thereby hedging against the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense (forecasted cash flows). Use of hedging contracts allows the Company to reduce its overall exposure to interest rate changes, since gains and losses on these contracts will offset losses and gains on the transactions being hedged. The Company formally documents all hedged transactions and hedging instruments, and assesses, both at inception of the contract and on an ongoing basis, whether the hedging instruments are effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged transaction. The fair values of the interest rate agreements are estimated by obtaining quotes from brokers and are the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the agreements at the reporting date, taking into consideration current interest rates and the current creditworthiness of the counterparties.
Effective June 3, 2002, the Company dedesignated the interest rate swap agreement for hedge accounting. As a result of the dedesignation, $12.9 million previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of the date of dedesignation is being amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the interest rate swap agreement. For the three months ended March 2, 2003, $1.0 million was amortized into interest expense. Prior to June 3, 2002, the changes in the fair market value of the interest rate swap were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Subsequent to June 3, 2002, changes in the fair market value of the interest rate swap are recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended March 2, 2003, $4.7 million was recorded as interest expense as a result of the change in its fair market value. At March 2, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of this instrument was $(22.4) million and $(20.2) million, respectively, which is recorded as follows:
March 2, 2003 |
December 1, 2002 | |||||
(in millions) | ||||||
Accrued interest |
$ |
2.4 |
$ |
2.1 | ||
Other accrued expenses |
|
8.2 |
|
7.6 | ||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
11.8 |
|
10.5 | ||
$ |
22.4 |
$ |
20.2 | |||
During the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into another interest rate swap agreement that has the effect of reestablishing as floating rate debt the $234.5 million of debt previously converted to fixed rate debt through December 2006. This interest rate swap agreement has not been designated for hedge accounting and, accordingly, any changes in the fair value are to be recorded in interest expense. For the three months ended March 2, 2003, $4.6 million was recorded as a reduction of interest expense as a result of the change in its fair market value. At March 2, 2003 and December 1, 2002, the fair value carrying amount of this instrument was $11.0 million and $7.8 million with $4.8 million and $5.1 million recorded in prepaid expense and other current assets and $6.2 million and $2.7 million recorded in noncurrent assets, respectively.
A 10% increase or decrease in market interest rates that effect the Companys interest rate derivative instruments would not have a material impact on earnings during the next fiscal year.
To protect against the reduction in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from purchases in foreign currency, the Company has instituted a forecasted cash flow hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its purchases denominated in foreign currencies with forward and options contracts.
Item 4. Internal Control and Procedures
Within the 90 days prior to the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (Disclosure Controls), and its internal controls and procedures for financial reporting (Internal Controls). This evaluation was done under the
23
supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Rules adopted by the SEC require that in this section of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q we present the conclusions of the CEO and CFO about the effectiveness of our Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls.
Disclosure Controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as this Quarterly Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal Controls are procedures which are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that our transactions are properly authorized; our assets are safeguarded against unauthorized or improper use; and our transactions are properly recorded and reported, all to permit the preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that the Companys Disclosure Controls or its Internal Controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. Control systems, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include factors such as judgments in decision-making that can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts, by collusion of others, or by override of the control by management. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, because of these inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
The CEO and CFO evaluation of our Disclosure Controls and Internal Controls included a review of the controls objectives and design, the controls implementation by the Company and the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In the course of this evaluation, the CEO and CFO sought to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were undertaken.
Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Companys Disclosure Controls require improvement as a result of findings from the evaluation. These findings, similar to those disclosed and discussed in the Companys Form 10-K filed March 3, 2003, included certain deficiencies (e.g. reportable conditions) related to the timely processing of customer transactions, the matching of customer transactions and the accuracy of the aging of certain accounts receivable. Management, together with the CEO and CFO attribute the conditions identified above to a data processing and information technology conversion undertaken during fiscal 2002. The Company has taken various corrective actions and implemented corrective procedures that address the identified conditions but which may not eliminate them.
Except as described above, there are no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation.
24
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Part I, Item 1 included herein.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) | Exhibits: |
10.1 Mattress Discounters Corporation Purchase Agreement
99.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K: |
None
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Sealy Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SEALY CORPORATION
Signature |
Title | |
/s/ DAVID J. MCILQUHAM David J. McIlquham |
Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) | |
/s/ JAMES B. HIRSHORN James B. Hirshorn |
Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
Date: April 16, 2003
26
Chief Executive Officer Certification of the Quarterly Financial Statements
I, David J. McIlquham, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sealy Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The | registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors: |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: April 16, 2003 |
/S/ DAVID J. MCILQUHAM | |||||||
David J. McIlquham Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
27
Chief Financial Officer Certification of the Quarterly Financial Statements
I, James B. Hirshorn, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sealy Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors: |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: April 16, 2003 |
/s/ JAMES B. HIRSHORN | |||||||
James B. Hirshorn Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
28