VALICERT INC - 10-Q Quarterly Report

	June 30, 2002			December 31, 2001
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments	$	10,250		$	23,717
Accounts receivable, net		2,715			3,441
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		631			1,214

Total current assets		13,596			28,372
Property and equipment, net		2,415			4,508
Goodwill, net		7,352			7,352
Intangible assets, net		449			755
Other assets		792			945

Total assets	$	24,604		$	41,932


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	4,260		$	6,623
Deferred revenue		3,041			3,782
Current portion of long-term debt		1,493			1,546

Total current liabilities		8,794			11,951
Long-term debt		873			1,547

Total liabilities		9,667			13,498


Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		107,232			108,193
Deferred stock compensation		(2,032	)		(3,732	)
Notes receivable from stockholders		—			(1,523	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		20			73
Accumulated deficit		(90,283	)		(74,577	)

Total stockholders’ equity		14,937			28,434

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	24,604		$	41,932

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Revenue:
Software license	$	1,773		$	4,320		$	2,913		$	7,695
Subscription fees and other services		1,598			1,688			3,791			3,382

Total revenues		3,371			6,008			6,704			11,077

Cost of revenues:
Software license		50			164			303			429
Subscription fees and other services		898			2,213			2,173			4,501

Total cost of revenues		948			2,377			2,476			4,930

Gross profit		2,423			3,631			4,228			6,147


Operating expenses:
Research and development		1,990			3,091			4,328			6,654
Sales and marketing		2,764			6,213			6,179			11,850
General and administrative		966			1,269			2,222			2,565
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets		153			802			306			1,588
Stock compensation *		1,576			518			2,005			1,089
Restructuring and impairment charges		—			—			4,736			—

Total operating expenses		7,449			11,893			19,776			23,746

Operating loss		(5,026	)		(8,262	)		(15,548	)		(17,599	)
Interest and other income (expense), net		16			178			(158	)		320

Net loss		(5,010	)		(8,084	)		(15,706	)		(17,279	)

Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized loss on short-term investments		(41	)		—			(94	)		—

Comprehensive loss	$	(5,051	)	$	(8,084	)	$	(15,800	)	$	(17,279	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.79	)

Shares used in computation of basic and diluted net loss per share		25,329			21,993			25,215			21,887

* Stock compensation
Costs of subscription fees and other services	$	33		$	65		$	71		$	124
Research and development		316			122			407			263
Sales and marketing		861			121			953			281
General and administrative		366			210			574			421

Total	$	1,576		$	518		$	2,005		$	1,089

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2002			2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(15,706	)	$	(17,279	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		809			1,347
Stock compensation		2,005			1,089
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets		306			1,587
Issuance of common stock and options for services		40			148
Interest on stockholder notes		(27	)		(27	)
Amortization of warrants issued in connection with debt financing		25			—
Non-cash restructuring and impairment charges		1,258			—
Impairment of software		147			—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		726			(574	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		558			—
Other assets		(48	)		(98	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(1,774	)		(573	)
Deferred revenue		(741	)		1,398

Net cash used in operating activities		(12,422	)		(12,982	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(355	)		(1,375	)
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments		3,919			—

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		3,564			(1,375	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance and repurchase of common stock, net		19			418
Collection of notes receivable from stockholders		71			58
Repayment of borrowings		(727	)		(536	)
Proceeds from borrowings		—			1,177

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(637	)		1,117
Net decrease in cash and equivalents		(9,495	)		(13,240	)
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period		14,747			37,523

Cash and cash equivalents—end of period	$	5,252		$	24,283

Noncash financing activities:
Deemed conversion of full-recourse notes receivable from stockholders to non-recourse	$	539		$	—

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information—cash paid during the period for interest	$	199		$	211

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Valicert, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“the Company”) reflect all adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented in conformity with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for the interim financial information. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The statements have been prepared in accordance with the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP. The results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full fiscal year or future operating periods. The information included in this report should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2002.

In June 2001, the Company entered into a common stock purchase agreement (“equity line”) with an investor for up to $50.0 million in equity financing over a 36-month period. Use of the equity line is subject to a number of terms and conditions. At June 30, 2002, we did not meet the minimum draw amount. As such, no amounts were available under the line. Related to the equity line, the Company granted the investor and a third party warrants to buy 200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.92 per share. The warrants expire three years from the issuance date and had a fair market value of $282,000, which will be offset against the proceeds of any future drawdowns under the equity line. The fair value of the warrants was determined by using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: expected life of 10 years; risk-free interest of 6.06%; volatility of 100%; and no dividends during the expected term.

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share reflects the weighted-average common shares outstanding plus the potential effect of dilutive securities or contracts which are convertible to common shares such as options and warrants (using the treasury stock method) and shares issuable in future periods, except in cases where the effect would be anti-dilutive.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Net loss (numerator), basic and diluted	$	(5,010	)	$	(8,084	)	$	(15,706	)	$	(17,279	)

Shares (denominator):
Weighted average common shares outstanding		25,509			22,750			25,464			22,770
Weighted average common shares subject to repurchase and held in escrow		(180	)		(757	)		(249	)		(883	)

Shares used in computation, basic and diluted		25,329			21,993			25,215			21,887

Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.79	)

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 141 requires that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 must be accounted for under the purchase method and addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. SFAS No. 142 addresses the initial recognition and measurement of intangible assets acquired outside of a business combination and the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 142 provides that intangible assets with indefinite useful lives will not be amortized, but will be tested at least annually for impairment. Since adopting SFAS No. 142, the Company no longer amortizes goodwill and acquired workforce with a net carrying value of $7.5 million at January 1, 2002, resulting in a reduction in annual amortization expense of $2.5 million The Company performed the required transitional impairment tests and determined that there was no impairment upon adoption of SFAS No. 142. The Company will perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and when circumstances suggest impairment may have occurred.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
Net loss:
As reported	$	(5,010	)	$	(8,084	)	$	(15,706	)	$	(17,279	)
add: goodwill amortization, net of taxes		—			613			—			1,210
add: acquired workforce amortization, net of taxes		—			36			—			72

As adjusted	$	(5,010	)	$	(7,435	)	$	(15,706	)	$	(15,997	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share:
As reported	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.79	)

As adjusted	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.34	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.73	)

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. While SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, it retains many of the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121. SFAS No. 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions of APB No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for the disposal of a segment of a business. However, it retains the requirement in APB No. 30 to report separately discontinued operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity that either has been disposed of (by sale, abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. The Company adopted SFAS 144 on January 1, 2002. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which addresses accounting for restructuring and similar costs. SFAS No. 146 supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3. The Company will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 146 for restructuring activities initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS No. 146 requires that the liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of the Company’s commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. Accordingly, SFAS No. 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized.

During the three months ended June 30, 2002, management determined that certain full-recourse notes, which had originally been issued to employees to exercise stock options, may not be pursued or collected. Under the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-23, Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44, this determination required the Company to consider all outstanding full-recourse notes to be converted, for accounting purposes, to non-recourse notes. All stock options previously exercised under full-recourse notes were deemed, for accounting purposes, to have been cancelled and replaced with new stock option awards under non-recourse notes. Accordingly, the Company recorded a charge of $938,000 related to the excess of the outstanding principal and interest balance of the notes over the fair value of the underlying stock at June 30, 2002. In addition, the Company expensed $250,000 of unamortized deferred stock compensation related to the unvested portion of the original stock options. Subsequent to June 30, 2002, 1,008,725 shares of common stock underlying these notes will be subject to variable accounting.

In April 2002, the Company completed a reduction in workforce, which resulted in the termination of 34 employees, or approximately 28% of the Company’s workforce. The affected employees included full-time regular employees across all departments. Employee separation expenses were primarily comprised of severance pay. All of the affected employees were terminated as of June 30, 2002, and the Company paid approximately $216,000 in separation benefits. The employee separation expenses were classified as salaries and other personnel-related costs and allocated to the appropriate functional department. There are no remaining cash payments related to these actions.

In January 2002, the Company completed a reduction in workforce, which resulted in the termination of 47 employees, or approximately 24% of the Company’s workforce. The affected employees included full-time regular employees across all departments. Employee separation expenses were primarily comprised of severance pay. All of the affected employees were terminated as of March 31, 2002, and the Company paid approximately $250,000 in separation benefits. The employee separation expenses were classified as salaries and other personnel-related costs and allocated to the appropriate functional department. There are no remaining cash payments related to these actions.

During the three months ended March 31, 2002, the Company recorded restructuring and impairment charges of approximately $4.7 million in accordance with EITF 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring), SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and SAB 100, Restructuring and Impairment Charges. The Company’s restructuring initiatives involved strategic decisions to cease providing certain services and to consolidate its corporate facilities. Of the $4.7 million, approximately $1.0 million related to equipment charges resulting from management’s decision to exit its application service provider business. The remaining $3.7 million related to consolidation of the Company’s corporate facilities and termination of the long-term facility lease contract for an unutilized facility located in Mountain View, California. The facility charge is comprised of $3.2 million for settlement costs and forfeiture expenses associated with the building and abandonment of leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures, partially offset by previously recorded deferred rent of approximately $434,000. During the three months ended March 31, 2002, the security deposit of approximately $201,000 was forfeited and $50,000 was paid for consulting fees. During the three months ended June 30, 2002, the Company paid $3.0 million in contract termination costs, approximately $127,000 in legal, consulting and administrative fees and $135,000 for building maintenance and abandonment of fixed assets. In addition, the Company issued $40,000 in common stock to a consultant for services in lieu of cash payment. At June 30, 2002, the following remained unpaid: $30,000 in legal, consulting and administrative fees and approximately $95,000 for building maintenance and abandonment of fixed assets.

A class action lawsuit was filed on December 3, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Valicert common stock alleging violations of federal securities laws. Lachance v. Valicert, Inc. et al., No. 01-CV-10889 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.), related to In re Initial Public Offerings Securities Litigation, No. 21 MC 92 (SAS). The case is brought purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased the Company’s common stock from July 27, 2000 through December 6, 2000. The complaint names as defendants the Company, its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, members of the Board of Directors, and an investment banking firm that served as an underwriter for the Company’s initial public offering in July 2000.

The complaint alleges that the prospectus incorporated in the registration statement for the offering failed to disclose, among other things, that (i) the underwriter had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the underwriter allocated to those investors material portions of the shares of the Company’s stock sold in the initial public offering, and (ii) the underwriter had entered into agreements with customers whereby the underwriter agreed to allocate shares of the Company’s stock sold in the initial public offering to those customers in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional shares of the Company’s stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. No specific damages are claimed. The Company believes that the allegations are without merit and intends to contest them vigorously. Because management believes that it is not possible at the current time to estimate the amount of the probable loss, if any, that might result from this matter, no provision for this matter has been made in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws that involve risks and uncertainties. The statements contained in this report that are not purely historical, including, without limitation, statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future, are forward-looking statements. In this report, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “plan”, “estimate”, “predict”, “potential”, “future”, “continue”, or similar expressions also identify forward-looking statements. These statements are only predictions. We make these forward-looking statements based upon information available on the date hereof, and we have no obligation (and expressly disclaim any such obligation) to update or alter any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in this report as a result of certain factors including, but not limited to, those set forth in this section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this report, including “Factors That May Impact Future Results”.

We are a leading provider of software solutions that enable companies to confidentially connect with their business partners and customers via the Internet for secure document delivery, collaboration and business process integration. Our customers use our products and services to help transfer costly or inefficient business processes to the Internet, while maintaining trust and security in the process. We believe that by utilizing our products and services, our customers are able to realize cost savings and achieve operating efficiencies by migrating existing networks, processes and systems onto the Internet rather than using dedicated leased lines for communications. We believe that our products and services reduce the costs of fraudulent transactions and security breaches, including direct losses, damage to reputation and productivity losses resulting from downtime. From 1996 through 1998, we primarily focused our activities on conducting research and development, raising capital, recruiting personnel, and establishing distribution channels for our software products.

We started commercial shipments of our validation authority software products during the first quarter of 1999. Our validation authority software products and services verify the status of digital certificates and establish the authority of a party before conducting a transaction. We also offer secure data transfer products and services, which we obtained from our acquisition of Receipt.com in December 1999. Our secure data transfer software products enable the confidential, reliable and tamper-proof transmission of data during a transaction. We completed an initial public offering of common stock in July 2000.

We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. Note that our preparation of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements required us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reported period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from these estimates.

Valuation of long-lived assets. Our long-lived assets include goodwill and other intangible assets. At June 30, 2002, we had $7.8 million of goodwill and other intangible assets, accounting for 31.7% of our total assets. In assessing the recoverability of our goodwill and other intangibles, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets. On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and are required to analyze our goodwill for impairment on an annual basis and when circumstances suggest impairment may have occurred. We performed the required transitional impairment tests during the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and determined that there was no impairment upon adoption of SFAS NO. 142.

When we deliver our software products electronically, we consider the sale complete when we provide the customer with the access codes for immediate possession of the software. When contracts contain multiple product and service elements, we account for the revenue related to these elements using the residual method as current accounting standards require. We recognize revenues when the fees are fixed and determinable. On occasion, we have in the past, and may in the future, offer extended payment terms beyond our normal business practice. In such cases, we recognize revenue when the fee becomes due. If we do not consider collectability probable, we recognize revenue when the fee is collected.

If maintenance and support or consulting services are included in a license agreement, amounts related to these services are allocated based on vendor-specific objective evidence. We recognize such fees ratably over the related service period. Customer contracts that require delivery of unspecified additional software products in the future are accounted for as subscriptions, and we recognize this revenue ratably over the term of the arrangement beginning with the delivery of the first product. We recognize consulting revenue as these services are provided to the customer. We recognize revenue from maintenance and support arrangements on a straight-line basis over the life of the agreement, which is typically one year.

Our consulting business derives a significant portion of its revenue from fixed-price, fixed-time contracts, which require the accurate estimation of the cost, scope and duration of each engagement. If we do not accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of work to be performed, or do not manage our projects properly within the planned periods of time or satisfy our obligations under the contracts, then future consulting margins may be significantly and negatively affected or we may need to recognize losses on existing contracts. Any such resulting reductions in margins or the recognition of contract losses could materially adversely affect our consolidated results of operations.

Although the terms of our software licenses provide for a free warranty period, we do not record a provision for estimated warranty costs, as such costs have historically been immaterial. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect future returns, or, if we experience significant, unexpected warranty costs with respect to a new product or a new version of an existing product, our future margins could be negatively affected.

Equity Line of Credit—In June 2001, Valicert entered into a common stock purchase agreement (“equity line”) with an investor for up to $50.0 million in equity financing over a 36-month period. Use of the equity line is subject to a number of terms and conditions. Related to the equity line, we incurred $452,000 in financing costs, including the cost of warrants granted to the investor and a third party. The costs were deferred to be offset against the proceeds of any future drawdowns under this agreement. If management determines that recoverablity of the deferred costs is unlikely, the deferred costs would be expensed at that time.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2002		2001		2002		2001
Revenue:
Software license	52.6	%	71.9	%	43.5	%	69.5	%
Subscription fees and other services	47.4	%	28.1	%	56.5	%	30.5	%
Total revenues	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

Cost of revenues:
Software license	1.5	%	2.7	%	4.5	%	3.9	%
Subscription fees and other services	26.6	%	36.8	%	32.4	%	40.6	%
Total cost of revenues	28.1	%	39.6	%	36.9	%	44.5	%
Gross profit	71.9	%	60.4	%	63.1	%	55.5	%

Operating expenses:
Research and development	59.0	%	51.4	%	64.6	%	60.1	%
Sales and marketing	82.0	%	103.4	%	92.2	%	107.0	%
General and administrative	28.7	%	21.1	%	33.1	%	23.2	%
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets	4.5	%	13.3	%	4.6	%	14.3	%
Stock compensation	46.8	%	8.6	%	29.9	%	9.8	%
Restructuring and impairment charges	—	%	—	%	70.6	%	—	%
Total operating expenses	221.0	%	198.0	%	295.0	%	214.4	%

Operating loss	(149.1	)%	(137.5	)%	(231.9	)%	(158.9	)%
Interest and other income (expense), net	0.5	%	3.0	%	(2.4	)%	2.9	%
Net loss	(148.6	)%	(134.6	)%	(234.3	)%	(156.0	)%

Total revenues decreased to $3.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. We believe the decrease in revenues was generally due to delayed information technology spending and a slowdown in public key infrastructure spending. In particular, delayed spending by our international customers adversely impacted us, and we also experienced a slowdown in license revenue from service provider customers who remain cautious about making the significant up-front investment needed to enter this business.

Software license revenues accounted for 52.6% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 compared to 71.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. Subscription fees and other service revenues accounted for 47.4% of our total revenues for quarter ended June 30, 2002 compared to 28.1% for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. The increase in subscription fees and other service revenues as a percentage of total revenues, was primarily due to the decrease in software license revenues.

Cost of software license revenues. Cost of software license revenues was $50,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $164,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001. These costs, as a percentage of total revenue, were 1.5% for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and 2.7% for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. The decrease in cost of software revenues was primarily due to reduced utilization of royalty-bearing technology we licensed from third parties.

Cost of subscription fees and other service revenues. Cost of subscription fees and other services relate to operating our secure data center and providing consulting and support services. These costs include salaries and other personnel-related costs, depreciation, telecommunications and other costs of operating and maintaining our secure data center. Our cost of subscription fees and other services revenues decreased to $898,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease of $1.3 million was primarily due to the fact that in January 2002 we completed a reduction in workforce, which resulted in the termination of approximately 75% of the secure data center workforce, and the actions taken to close the customer data center. In April 2002, we completed an additional reduction in workforce that resulted in the termination of 35% of our consulting and support services workforce.

Research and development. Research and development expenses consist of salaries and other personnel-related costs, third-party consulting services, and the cost of facilities and computer equipment. Research and development expenses decreased to $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, a decrease of 35.6%. Of this decrease, $257,000 related to facilities costs, $134,000 related to the decrease in use of third-party consultants and contractors, and $955,000 related to salaries and other personnel-related costs due to a decrease in average headcount in the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as compared to the same quarter in 2001. Research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenues were at 59.0% for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, compared to 51.4% for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. We expect that research and development expenses will continue to decline in fiscal 2002, primarily as a result of our workforce reductions in the first, second and third quarters of the year.

Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist of salaries and other personnel-related costs, sales commissions, tradeshows, marketing programs, travel, facilities and computer equipment. Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $6.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2001, a decrease of 55.5%. Of this decrease, caused primarily by a reduction in the sales and marketing headcount, $2.3 million related to reduced salaries and other personnel related costs, $389,000 related to reduced tradeshows and marketing programs, and $218,000 related to lower facilities costs. We experienced a 43.9% decrease in revenues from the quarter ended June 30, 2001, as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2002, which resulted in a significant decrease in commission expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, reflected in the salaries and other personnel related costs. Sales and marketing costs as a percentage of total revenues were 82.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2002, compared to 103.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. During the second quarter of 2002, we closed our international sales offices in Hong Kong and Spain. We expect that sales and marketing expenses will decline in absolute dollars in 2002 primarily due to reductions in workforce, but will fluctuate as a percentage of total revenues for the foreseeable future.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses consist of salaries and other personnel-related costs for our administrative, finance, and human resources employees; legal and accounting services; and facilities costs. General and administrative expenses decreased to $966,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002, a decrease of 23.9%. Of this decrease, $319,000 related to a decrease in use of third-party consultants and contractors $186,000 related to lower salaries and other personnel related costs as a result of the reduction in the general and administrative headcount. General and administrative costs as a percentage of total revenues were 28.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2002, compared to 21.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2001. This increase was a result of our lower revenues in 2002 . We expect that general and administrative expenses will not decrease significantly in absolute dollars, but will fluctuate as a percentage of total revenue for the foreseeable future.

Amortization of goodwill and intangibles. Amortization of intangibles, related to the acquisition of Receipt.com, was $153,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to amortization of goodwill and intangibles of $802,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease in this expense is due to our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets. As of January 1, 2002, and in accordance with SFAS No. 142, we no longer amortize goodwill or certain intangibles. No impairment charges related to goodwill have been taken as of June 30, 2002.

Stock compensation. Deferred stock compensation represents the difference between the exercise price of stock options granted and the estimated fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant. As of July 2000, we had recorded deferred stock compensation of $3.7 million for stock options we assumed as part of our acquisition of Receipt.com and an additional $6.0 million related to the grant of other employee stock options (net of $2.0 million reversed due to the cancellation of options of terminated employees). Deferred stock compensation is being amortized over the vesting period of the underlying options (generally four years) through September 30, 2004, which resulted in an expense of $388,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and $518,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. We expect amortization of deferred stock compensation to decrease in 2002 due to the cancellation of additional options as a result of our recent reductions in workforce.

During the three months ended June 30, 2002, we determined that certain full-recourse notes, which had originally been issued to employees to exercise stock options, may not be pursued or collected. Under the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 00-23, Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB Interpretation No. 44, this determination required us to consider all outstanding full-recourse notes to be converted, for accounting purposes, to non-recourse notes. All stock options previously exercised under full-recourse notes were deemed, for accounting purposes, to have been cancelled and replaced with new stock option awards under non-recourse notes. Accordingly, we recorded a charge of $938,000 related to the excess of the outstanding principal and interest balance of the notes over the fair value of the underlying stock at June 30, 2002. In addition, during the quarter ended June 30, 2002 we expensed $250,000 of unamortized deferred stock compensation related to the unvested portion of original stock options. Subsequent to June 30, 2002, 1,008,725 shares of common stock underlying these notes will be subject to variable accounting.

Restructuring and impairment charges. In April 2002, we completed a reduction in workforce, which resulted in the termination of 34 employees, or approximately 28% of our workforce. The affected employees included full-time regular employees across all departments. Employee separation expenses were primarily comprised of severance pay. All of the affected employees were terminated as of June 30, 2002, and we paid approximately $216,000 in separation benefits. The employee separation expenses were classified as salaries and other personnel-related costs and allocated to the appropriate functional department. There are no remaining cash payments related to these actions.

There can be no assurance that our restructuring activities will be sufficient to allow us to generate improved operating results in future periods. It is possible that additional changes in our business or in our industry may necessitate additional restructuring expenses in the future. The necessity for additional restructuring activities may result in expenses that adversely affect reported results of operations in the period the restructuring plan is adopted, and require incremental cash payments.

Interest and other income (expense). During the quarter ended June 30, 2002, we recorded a net income, for interest and other income, of $16,000, as compared to $178,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, primarily due to a decrease in our cash and investment balances and lower interest rates earned on our investments, partially offset by a decrease in interest costs on our equipment loans and leases.

Total revenues decreased to $6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $11.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. We believe the decrease in revenues was primarily due to delayed information technology spending and a slowdown in public key infrastructure spending. In particular, delayed spending by our international customers adversely impacted us, and we also experienced a slowdown in license revenue from service provider customers, who remain cautious about making the significant up-front investment needed to enter this business.

Software license revenues accounted for 43.5% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to 69.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Subscription fees and other service revenues accounted for 56.5% of our total revenues for six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to 30.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase in subscription fees and other service revenues, as a percentage of total revenues, was primarily due to a decrease in software license revenues and a slight increase in maintenance and support renewals.

Cost of software license revenues. Cost of software license revenues was $303,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $429,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001. These costs, as a percentage of total revenue, were 4.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 3.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The slight decrease in cost of software revenues as a percentage of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to the same six month period in 2001 was primarily due to the our reduced utilization of royalty-bearing technology that we licensed from third parties, partially offset by a charge of approximately $147,000 taken during the period for licensed software deemed obsolete.

Cost of subscription fees and other service revenues. Our cost of subscription fees and other services revenues decreased to $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $4.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease of $2.3 million was primarily due to the fact that in January 2002 we completed a reduction in workforce, which resulted in the termination of approximately 75% of the secure data center workforce, and the subsequent actions taken to close the customer data center. In April 2002, we completed an additional reduction in workforce that resulted in the termination of 35% of our consulting and support services workforce.

Research and development. Research and development expenses decreased to $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, from $6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, a decrease of 35.0%. Of this decrease, $343,000 related to the reduction in use of third-party consultants and contractors, $408,000 related to facilities costs and $1.8 million related to salaries and other personnel-related costs due to a decrease in headcount in the six months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to the same period in 2001. Research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased slightly to 64.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to 60.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase is due to the fact that our revenues decreased at a greater rate than our expenses.

Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $6.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 from $11.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, a decrease of 47.9%. Of this decrease, caused primarily by reductions in sales and marketing headcount, $3.6 million related to reduced salaries and other personnel related costs, $904,000 related to reduced tradeshows and marketing programs and $492,000 related to a decrease in use of third-party consultants and contractors. We experienced a 39.5% decrease in total revenues from the six months ended June 30, 2001 to the same period in 2002, which resulted in a significant decrease in commission expense for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Sales and marketing costs as a percentage of total revenues were 92.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to 107.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we closed international sales offices in Argentina, Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore and Spain.

General and administrative. General and administrative expenses decreased slightly to $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. General and administrative costs as a percentage of total revenues were 33.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to 23.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased for the first six months of 2002 because our revenues decreased at a greater rate than our expenses.

Amortization of goodwill and intangibles. Amortization of intangibles, related to the acquisition of Receipt.com, was $306,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to amortization of goodwill and intangibles of $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease in this expense was due to our adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets. As of on January 1, 2002, and in accordance with SFAS No. 142, we no longer amortize goodwill or certain intangibles. No impairment charges related to goodwill have been taken as of June 30, 2002.

Stock compensation. Deferred stock compensation represents the difference between the exercise price of stock options granted and the estimated fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of the grant. As of July 2000, we had recorded deferred stock compensation of $3.7 million for stock options we assumed as part of our acquisition of Receipt.com and an additional $6.0 million related to the grant of other employee stock options (net of $2.0 million reversed due to the cancellation of options of terminated employees). Deferred stock compensation is being amortized over the vesting period of the underlying options (generally four years) through September 30, 2004, which resulted in an expense of $817,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001.

In January 2002, we completed a reduction in workforce, which resulted in the termination of 47 employees, or approximately 24% of our workforce. The affected employees included full-time regular employees across all departments. Employee separation expenses were primarily comprised of severance pay. All of the affected employees were terminated as of March 31, 2002, and we paid approximately $250,000 in separation benefits. The employee separation expenses were classified as salaries and other personnel-related costs and allocated to the appropriate functional department. There are no remaining cash payments related to these actions.

During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we recorded restructuring and impairment charges of approximately $4.7 million in accordance with EITF 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring) , SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and SAB 100, Restructuring and Impairment Charges. Our recent restructuring initiatives involved strategic decisions to cease providing certain services and consolidate its corporate facilities. Approximately $1.0 million related to equipment charges resulting from our decision to exit our application service provider business. The remaining $3.7 million related to consolidation of our corporate facilities and termination of the long-term facility lease contract for an unutilized facility located in Mountain View, California. The facility charge is comprised of $3.2 million for settlement costs and forfeiture expenses associated with the building and abandonment of leasehold improvements, furniture and fixtures, partially offset by previously recorded deferred rent of approximately $434,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, the security deposit of approximately $201,000 was forfeited, we paid $3.0 million in contract termination costs and approximately $177,000 in legal, consulting and administrative fees and $135,000 for building maintenance and abandonment of fixed assets. In addition, we issued $40,000 in common stock to a consultant for services in lieu of cash payment. At June 30, 2002, the following remained unpaid: $30,000 in legal, consulting and administrative fees and approximately $95,000 for building maintenance and abandonment of fixed assets.

Interest and other income (expense). During the six months ended June 30, 2002, we recorded a net expense, for interest and other income, of $158,000 compared to net income of $320,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2001, primarily due to a decrease in our cash and investment balances and lower interest rates earned on our investments coupled with losses on foreign exchange, partially offset by a decrease in interest costs on our equipment loans and leases.

In June 2001, we entered into a $50.0 million common stock equity line with Rellian Investments Limited, pursuant to which, in the event we draw down on the equity line, we may be required to issue up to 4,520,449 shares of our common stock. In the same transaction, we issued a warrant to Rellian Investments Limited for 100,000 shares of our common stock and a warrant to Pacific Crest Securities, Inc. for 100,000 shares of our common stock. We are able to draw down on the common stock equity line on a monthly basis, subject to certain conditions. The formula used to calculate the amount available includes a specified percentage of the total trading volume and volume weighted average price of our stock over the 60 calendar days prior to the draw, less a 7% discount. At June 30, 2002, we did not meet the minimum draw amount. As such, no amounts were available under the line.

Net cash used in operating activities was $12.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $13.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001, and was primarily used to fund our net losses. Net cash used for operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2002 related primarily to a net loss of $15.7 million partially offset by the non-cash portion of restructuring and impairment charges of $1.4 million and non-cash expenses for depreciation, amortization and stock compensation of $3.1 million, and other changes in working capital. Net cash used for operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2001 related primarily to a net loss of $17.3 million partially offset by non-cash expenses for depreciation, amortization and stock compensation of $4.0 million and other changes in working capital.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $3.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and net cash used in investing activities was $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Net cash provided by investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2002 related primarily to the sale of short-term assets of $3.9 million, partially offset by purchase of capital equipment expenditures of $355,000. Net cash used during the six months ended June 30, 2001 related to the purchase of capital equipment expenditures, primarily relating to the purchase of computer hardware and software, office furniture and equipment, and leasehold improvements. We do not expect to substantially increase our capital expenditures in the foreseeable future, nor do we anticipate incurring any significant new lease commitments.

Net cash used in financing activities was $637,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and net cash provided by financing activities was $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2002 related primarily to repayment of borrowings of $727,000 partially offset by issuance of common stock and collection of notes receivable from stockholders of $71,000. Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2001 related primarily to borrowings of $1.2 million under certain equipment leases and issuance of common stock of $418,000 partially offset by repayment of borrowings of $536,000.

During the first quarter of 2002, we consolidated our corporate facilities and discontinued our secure data center operations. As a result, we reduced our workforce from 194 to 147 as of June 30, 2002. Accordingly, we do not expect operating expenses to increase significantly over the next several quarters. We anticipate that our operating expenses and planned capital expenditures will constitute the most significant use of our cash resources. We may also utilize cash resources to fund acquisitions of, or investments in, complementary businesses, technologies and product lines.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments together with the expected cash receipts from future revenues will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs for at least the next 12 months. However, if for any reason demand for our products does not meet our expectations, we may need to raise additional funds before then. Even if not required, we may seek additional financing at any time over the next 12 months to improve our overall financial position. We may not be able to obtain adequate or favorable financing at these times. Any additional financing may dilute your ownership interest in Valicert. New equity securities could have rights senior to those of our common stockholders.

We adopted SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 142 provides that intangible assets with indefinite useful lives will not be amortized, but will be tested at least annually for impairment. Since adopting SFAS No. 142, we no longer amortize goodwill and acquired workforce with a net carrying value of $7.5 million at January 1, 2002, resulting in a reduction in annual amortization expense of $2.5 million. We performed the required transitional impairment tests during the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and determined that there was no impairment upon adoption of SFAS. No. 142. We will perform goodwill impairment tests on an annual basis and when circumstances suggest impairment may have occurred.

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. While SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, it retains many of the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121. SFAS No. 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions of APB No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for the disposal of a segment of a business. However, it retains the requirement in APB No. 30 to report separately discontinued operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity that either has been disposed of (by sale, abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. We adopted SFAS 144 on January 1, 2002. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which addresses accounting for restructuring and similar costs. SFAS No. 146 supersedes previous accounting guidance, principally Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3. We will adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 146 for restructuring activities initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS No. 146 requires that the liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of our commitment to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. Accordingly, SFAS No. 146 may affect the timing of recognizing future restructuring costs as well as the amounts recognized.

If the market price for our common stock remains below $1.00 per share through September 9, 2002 or we otherwise fail to meet certain criteria for continued listing on The Nasdaq National Market, we have been notified by Nasdaq that our common stock may be delisted. Should our common stock be delisted from The Nasdaq National Market, our common stock would trade on either The Nasdaq SmallCap Market or Over-the-Counter (OTC). If the market price for our common stock remains below $1.00 through December 9, 2002 or we otherwise fail to meet criteria for listing, our common stock would not be eligible to trade on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market. If our common stock is traded OTC, you likely would find it more difficult to trade in or obtain accurate quotations for the market price of our common stock.

If our common stock is considered “penny stock” under Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, it would be subject to rules that impose additional sales practices in broker-dealers who sell our securities. For example, broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale. Also, a disclosure schedule must be prepared prior to any transaction involving a penny stock and disclosure is required about sales commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Monthly statements are also required to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stock. Because of these additional obligations, some brokers may be unwilling to effect transactions in penny stocks. This could have an adverse effect on the liquidity of our common stock and the ability of investors to sell the common stock.

As a means to conform to the Nasdaq minimum price rule, we may request stockholders to approve a reverse stock split for the purpose of increasing our stock price above $1.00 per share We cannot predict whether a reverse stock split, if completed, will increase the market price for our common stock. The history of similar stock split combinations for companies in like circumstances is varied. There is no assurance that the market price per share of our common stock following the reverse stock split will remain in excess of the $1.00 minimum bid price as required by Nasdaq or that we will otherwise meet the requirements of Nasdaq for continued inclusion for trading on The Nasdaq National Market. A reverse stock split could negatively impact the value of our common stock by allowing additional downward pressure on the stock price as its relative value becomes greater following the reverse split. In other words, the stock, at its new higher price, has farther to fall and therefore more room for investors to short or otherwise trade the value of the stock downward. Similarly, a delisting may negatively impact the value of the stock as stocks trading on the OTC market are typically less liquid and trade with larger variations between bid and ask price. The market price of our common stock will also be based on our performance and other factors, some of which are unrelated to the number of shares outstanding. If a reverse split is effected and the market price of our common stock declines, the percentage decline as an absolute number and as a percentage of our overall market capitalization may be greater than would occur in the absence of a reverse stock split. Furthermore, liquidity of our common stock could be adversely affected by the reduced number of shares that would be outstanding after the reverse stock split.

We introduced our first commercial product in the first quarter of 1999 and have generated only limited revenues. Because we have a limited operating history with our products and services, and because our sources of potential revenue may continue to shift as our business develops, our future operating results and our future stock prices are difficult to predict. Our success also depends in part on:

The length of our sales cycle is uncertain, which makes it difficult to accurately forecast the quarter in which our sales will occur. This may cause our revenues and operating results to vary from quarter-to-quarter. We spend considerable time and expense providing information to prospective customers about the use and benefits of our products and services without generating corresponding revenue. Our expense levels are relatively fixed and we do not know when particular sales efforts will begin to generate revenues.

Prospective customers of our products and services often require long testing and approval processes before making a purchase decision. The process of entering into a licensing arrangement with a potential customer may involve lengthy negotiations. In the past, our sales cycle has ranged from one to nine or more months. Our sales cycle is also subject to delays because we have little or no control over customer-specific factors, including customers’ budgetary constraints and internal acceptance procedures. Because our technology must often be integrated with the products and services of other vendors, there may be a significant delay between the use of our software and services in a pilot system and its commercial deployment by our customers.

We have incurred significant net losses. We incurred net losses of $15.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2002 and $17.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2001. As of June 30, 2002, we had incurred cumulative losses of $90.3 million. Recovery of the current economic environment in the United States and globally provide us with little insight into the foreseeable future. If economic conditions worsen, wide acceptance of electronic commerce may be adverse affected. As a consequence, the market for our products and services may fail to develop and grow and we may be unable to achieve our financial targets.

Our success will depend to a substantial degree on our ability to offer products and services that incorporate leading technology and to respond to technological advances. If we fail to offer products and services that incorporate leading technology and respond to technological advances and emerging standards, we may not generate sufficient revenues to offset our development costs and other expenses, which will hurt our business. The development of new or enhanced products and services is a complex and uncertain process that requires the accurate anticipation of technological and market trends. We may experience development, marketing and other technological difficulties that may delay or limit our ability to respond to technological changes, evolving industry standards, competitive developments or customer requirements. You should also be aware that:

A limited number of customers have accounted for a significant portion of our revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2002, five customers accounted for 39.0% of total revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2002, five customers accounted for 51.1% of total revenues. We anticipate that our operating results in any given period will continue to depend to a significant extent upon revenues from a small number of customers. We do not have long-term contracts with our customers that obligate them to license our software products or use our services. We cannot be certain that we will retain our customers or that we will be able to obtain new customers. If we were to lose one or more customers, our revenues could decline.

Any failure of our sales efforts to generate revenues at the times and in the amounts we anticipate could cause significant variations in our operating results. During our sales cycle, we spend considerable time and expense providing information to prospective customers about the use and benefits of our products and services without generating corresponding revenue. Our expense levels are relatively fixed in the short term and there is substantial uncertainty as to when particular sales efforts will begin to generate revenues.

One of our significant business strategies has been to enter into strategic or other similar collaborative alliances to increase the adoption of our products and services. Prospective customers of our products and services often require long testing and approval processes before making a purchase decision. In general, the process of entering into a licensing arrangement with a potential customer may involve lengthy negotiations. As a result, our sales cycle has been and may continue to be unpredictable. In the past, our sales cycle has ranged from one to nine or more months. Our sales cycle is also subject to delays as a result of customer-specific factors over which we have little or no control, including budgetary constraints and internal acceptance procedures. In addition, because our technology must often be integrated with the products and services of other vendors, there may be a significant delay between the use of our software and services in a pilot system and its commercial deployment by our customers. The length of the sales cycle makes it difficult to accurately forecast the timing and amount of our sales. This may cause our revenues and operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter and could harm our business.

One of our significant business strategies has been to enter into strategic or other similar collaborative alliances in order to reach a larger customer base than we could reach through our direct sales and marketing efforts. We will need to maintain or enter into additional strategic alliances to execute our business plan. However, if we are unable to maintain our strategic alliances or enter into additional strategic alliances, our business could be materially harmed. We may not be able to enter into additional strategic alliances or maintain our existing strategic alliances. If we do not, we would have to devote substantially more resources to the distribution, sales and marketing of our security products and services than we would otherwise.

We have entered into technology, marketing and distribution agreements with several companies. However, we may be unable to leverage the brand and distribution power of these strategic alliances to increase the adoption rate of our technology. We have been establishing strategic alliances to ensure that third-party solutions are interoperable with our software products and services. To the extent that our products are not interoperable or our strategic allies choose not to integrate our technology into their offerings, this failure would inhibit the adoption of our software products and outsourced services. Furthermore, as a result of our emphasis on these strategic alliances, our success will depend in part on the ultimate success of other parties to these alliances. Failure of one or more of our strategic alliances to achieve any of these objectives could materially harm our business.

Our existing strategic alliances do not, and any future strategic alliances may not, grant us exclusive marketing or distribution rights. In addition, the other parties may not view their alliances with us as significant for their own businesses. Therefore, they could reduce their commitment to us at any time in the future. These parties could also pursue alternative technologies or develop alternative products and services, either on their own or in collaboration with others, including our competitors. Should any of these developments occur, our business will be harmed.

Our failure to grow and develop our direct sales channel and increase the number of our indirect distribution channels could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. We must increase the number of strategic and other third-party relationships with vendors of Internet-related systems and application software, resellers and systems integrators. Our existing or future channel partners may choose to devote greater resources to marketing and supporting the products of other companies.

Our business depends upon our continuing access to data for the issuance and revocation of digital certificates by certificate authorities and other third parties, including businesses and governmental entities. We depend upon our ability to negotiate arrangements with these certificate authorities, some of which are our competitors, and other third parties to make this data available to us. If our access to this data is limited or denied by one or more certificate authorities or other third parties, our ability to verify and validate digital certificates would be impaired, perhaps severely, which could cause a decline in our revenues and in the value of your investment.

Since we sell through multiple channels and distribution networks, we may have to resolve potential conflicts between these channels. For example, these conflicts may result from the different discount levels offered by multiple channel partners to their customers or, potentially, from our direct sales force targeting the same accounts as our indirect channel partners. Such conflicts may harm our business or reputation.

We have developed our products and services partially based on technology we license on a non-exclusive basis from third parties. Our inability to continue to license these third-party technologies on commercially reasonable terms will harm our business. We expect that, in the future, we will continue to have to license technologies from third parties. Our inability to continue to license on commercially reasonable terms, one or more of the technologies that we currently use or our failure to obtain the right to use future technologies could increase our costs and delay or possibly prevent product development. Our existing licensing agreements may be terminated by the other parties to these contracts, or may not be renewed on favorable terms or at all. In addition, we may not be able to license new technologies on favorable terms, if at all.

We are substantially dependent on the continued services and performance of our senior management and other key personnel. We do not maintain key person insurance on any of our executive officers. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees, particularly Joseph (Yosi) Amram, our president and chief executive officer, and Srinivasan (Chini) Krishnan, our founder and chairman, could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our development and strategic objectives.

We also must continue to train, retain, and motivate highly skilled technical, managerial, sales and marketing and professional services personnel. Due to the various workforce reductions that we completed, the moral of our remaining employees may decrease, and we may be unable to retain them. In addition, if our stock price decreases substantially, it may be more difficult to retain employees who consider stock options an important part of their compensation package. If we encounter difficulties retaining software engineering personnel at a critical stage of product development, our relationship with existing and future customers could be harmed. The failure to retain necessary technical, managerial, sales, marketing and professional services personnel could harm our business and our ability to obtain new customers and develop new products.

We rely upon copyrights, trade secrets, know-how, patents, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to maintain and further develop our market position. We rely on outside licensors for patent and software license rights in encryption technology that is incorporated into and is necessary for the operation of our products and services. Our success will depend in part on our continued ability to have access to technologies that are or may become important to the functionality of our products and services. Any inability to continue to procure or use this technology could be materially adverse to our operations.

Our success will also depend in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights from infringement, misappropriation, duplication and discovery by third parties. We cannot assure you that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary technology or gain access to our trade secrets or disclose our technology or that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets. Attempts by others to utilize our intellectual property rights could undermine our ability to retain or secure customers. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. Our attempts to enforce our intellectual property rights could be time consuming and costly.

We cannot assure you that our pending or future patent applications will be granted or that any patents that are issued will be enforceable or valid. Additionally, the coverage claimed in a patent application can be significantly reduced before the patent is issued. We cannot be certain that we were the first inventor of inventions covered by our issued patent or pending patent applications or that we are the first to file patent applications for such inventions. Moreover, we may have to participate in interference proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office to determine priority of invention, which could result in substantial cost to us. An adverse outcome could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require disputed rights to be licensed from or to third parties or require us to cease using the technology in dispute.

We are aware of pending and issued United States and foreign patent rights owned by third parties that relate to cryptography technology. Third parties may assert that we infringe their intellectual property rights based upon issued patents, trade secrets or know-how that they believe cover our technology. In addition, future patents may issue to third parties which we may infringe. It may be time consuming and costly to defend ourselves against any of these claims and we cannot assure you that we would prevail.

Furthermore, parties making such claims may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief that could block our ability to further develop or commercialize some or all of our products in the United States and abroad. In the event of a claim of infringement, we may be required to obtain one or more licenses from or pay royalties to third parties. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain any such licenses at a reasonable cost, if at all. Defense of any lawsuit or failure to obtain such license could hurt our business.

We may need to seek additional funding in the future. If we cannot raise funds on acceptable terms, we may be unable to develop or enhance our products and services, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. We may also be required to reduce operating costs through lay-offs or reduce our sales and marketing or research and development efforts. If we issue equity securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock.

If the marketplace does not associate us with high-quality, end-to-end secure infrastructure software products and services, it may be difficult for us to keep our existing customers, attract new customers or successfully introduce new products and services. Competitive and other pressures may require us to increase our expenses to promote our brand name, and the benefits associated with brand creation may not outweigh the risks and costs associated with establishing our brand name. Our failure to develop a strong brand name or the incurrence of excessive costs associated with establishing our brand name may harm our business.

A requirement for the continued growth of electronic commerce is the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks. We rely on public key cryptography, an encryption method that utilizes two keys, a public and private key, for encoding and decoding data, and on digital certificate technology, to provide the security and authentication necessary for secure transmission of confidential information. Regulatory and export restrictions may prohibit us from using the strongest and most secure cryptographic protection available, and thereby may expose us or our customers to a risk of data interception. A party who is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or interrupt our or our customers’ operations. Any compromise or elimination of our security could result in risk of loss or litigation and possible liability and reduce demand for our products and services.

If we are not able to continue to include our public root keys within software applications, including Microsoft Windows 2000, the Microsoft Internet Explorer browser and the Netscape browser, customers might perceive our software products as too cumbersome to use and our business may be harmed. Our public root keys are used by applications to insure that digitally signed objects which are generated by our Enterprise VA and Digital Receipt Solutions are trustworthy and have not been tampered with or corrupted. The term of our root key agreement with Netscape ends in November 2002 and we cannot assure you that this agreement will be renewed. In addition, our root key agreement with Microsoft may not be extended to cover subsequent releases of Microsoft Windows 2000 or the Microsoft Internet Explorer browser.

A default under any debt facility could, under cross-default provisions, result in defaults under other debt instruments, entitling other lenders to declare all debt outstanding under those other facilities to be immediately due and payable. If any declaration of acceleration were to occur, we might be unable to make those required payments or to raise sufficient funds from other sources to make those payments. In addition, we have pledged substantially all of our assets to secure our credit facilities. If a default occurs with respect to secured indebtedness, the holders of that indebtedness would be entitled to foreclose on their collateral, which would harm our business.

Any disruption to a customer’s website or application caused by our products or services could result in a claim for substantial damages against us, regardless of our responsibility for the failure. Our existing insurance coverage may not continue to be available on reasonable terms or in amounts sufficient to cover one or more large claims. Our insurer may also disclaim coverage as to any claims, which could result in substantial costs to us.

A class action lawsuit was filed on December 3, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of Valicert common stock alleging violations of federal securities laws. Lachance v. Valicert, Inc. et al., No. 01-CV-10889 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.), related to In re Initial Public Offerings Securities Litigation, No. 21 MC 92 (SAS). The case is brought purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased our common stock from July 27, 2000 through December 6, 2000. The complaint names as defendants the Company; Joseph (Yosi) Amram, President, Chief Executive Officer, and member of the Board of Directors; Timothy Conley, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer; and an investment banking firm that served as an underwriter for the our initial public offering in July 2000.

The complaint alleges violations of Section 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 against all defendants, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the underwriter, on the grounds that the prospectus incorporated in the registration statement for the offering failed to disclose, among other things, that (i) the underwriter had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the underwriter allocated to those investors material portions of the shares of our stock sold in the initial public offering, and (ii) the underwriter had entered into agreements with customers whereby the underwriter agreed to allocate shares of our stock sold in the initial public offering to those customers in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional shares of our stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. No specific damages are claimed. We believe that the allegations are without merit and we intend to contest them vigorously. We cannot assure you, however, that we will prevail in this lawsuit. Failure to prevail could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the future.

We are subject to regulations applicable to businesses generally and laws or regulations directly applicable to companies utilizing the Internet. Although there are currently few laws and regulations directly applicable to the Internet, it is possible that a number of laws and regulations may be adopted with respect to the Internet. These laws could cover issues like user privacy, pricing, content, intellectual property, distribution, antitrust, legal liability and characteristics and quality of products and services. The adoption of any additional laws or regulations could decrease the demand for our products and services and increase our cost of doing business, or otherwise could harm our business or prospects.

Moreover, the applicability to the Internet of existing laws in various jurisdictions governing issues like property ownership, sales and other taxes, libel and personal privacy is uncertain. For example, tax authorities in a number of states are currently reviewing the appropriate tax treatment of companies engaged in online commerce. New state tax regulations may subject us to additional state sales and income taxes. Any new legislation or regulation, the application of laws and regulations from jurisdictions whose laws do not currently apply to our business, or the application of existing laws and regulations to the Internet and commercial online services could harm our ability to conduct business and our operating results.

We prepare our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). GAAP is subject to interpretation by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Securities and Exchange Commission and various bodies formed to interpret and create appropriate accounting policies. A change in these policies or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported results, and may even affect the reporting of transactions completed prior to the announcement of a change.

At June 30, 2002, we had recorded goodwill with a net book value of $7.4 million related to our 1999 acquisition of Receipt.com. We test goodwill for impairment at least annually and when evidence of an impairment exists. We do not believe that any events have occurred to indicate that an impairment exists at June 30, 2002. However, if future financial performance or other events indicate that the value of our recorded goodwill is impaired, we may be required to record impairment charges which could have a material adverse effect on our reported results.

In order to comply with the newly adopted Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as proposed changes to listing standards by Nasdaq, and proposed accounting changes by the Securities and Exchange Commission, we may be required to increase our internal controls, hire additional personnel and additional outside legal, accounting and advisory services, all of which could cause our general and administrative costs to increase. Proposed changes in the accounting rules, including legislative and other proposals to account for employee stock options as compensation expense among others, could increase the expenses that we report under GAAP and adversely affect our operating results.

The market for our products and services is new and evolving rapidly. If the market for our products and services fail to develop and grow, or if our products and services do not gain broad market acceptance, our business and prospects will be harmed. In particular, our success will depend upon the adoption and use by current and potential customers and their end-users of secure online transaction products and services. Our success will also depend upon acceptance of our technology as the standard for providing these products and services. The adoption and use of our products and services will involve changes in the manner in which businesses have traditionally completed transactions. We cannot predict whether our products and services will achieve any market acceptance. Our ability to achieve our goals also depends upon rapid market acceptance of future enhancements of our products. Any enhancement that is not favorably received by customers and end-users may not be profitable and, furthermore, could damage our reputation or brand name.

Competition in the security infrastructure market is intense. If we are unable to compete effectively, our ability to increase our market share and revenue will be harmed. We compete with companies that provide individual products and services that are similar to certain aspects of our software products and services. Certificate authority software vendors and vendors of other security products and services could enter the market and provide end-to-end solutions which might be more comprehensive than our solutions. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger installed customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources. As a result, they may be able to adapt more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, or to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of their products. We anticipate that the market for security products and services that enable valid, secure and provable electronic commerce and communications over the Internet will remain intensely competitive. We expect that competition will increase in the near term and increased competition could result in pricing pressures, reduced margins or the failure of our Internet-based security products and services to achieve or maintain market acceptance, any of which could materially harm our business.

In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may in the future establish collaborative relationships among themselves or with third parties, including third parties with whom we have strategic alliances, to increase the ability of their products to address the security needs of our prospective customers. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. If this were to occur, our business could be materially affected.

In order for us to be successful, the Internet must be widely adopted as a medium for conducting electronic commerce. Because electronic commerce over the Internet is new and evolving, it is difficult to predict the size of this market and its sustainable growth rate. To date, many businesses and consumers have been deterred from utilizing the Internet for a number of reasons, including but not limited to:

The adoption of the Internet will require a broad acceptance of new methods of conducting business and exchanging information. Companies and government agencies that already have invested substantial resources in other methods of conducting business may be reluctant to adopt new methods. Also, individuals with established patterns of purchasing goods and services and effecting payments may be reluctant to change.

The use of the Internet may not increase or may increase more slowly than we expect because the infrastructure required to support widespread use may not develop. The Internet may continue to experience significant growth both in the number of users and the level of use. However, the Internet infrastructure may not be able to continue to support the demands placed on it by continued growth. Continued growth may also affect the Internet’s performance and reliability. In addition, the growth and reliability of the Internet could be harmed by delays in development or adoption of new standards and protocols to handle increased levels of activity or by increased governmental regulation. Changes in, or insufficient availability of, communications services to support the Internet could result in poor performance and adversely affect its usage. Any of these factors could materially harm our business.

The technology used to keep private keys confidential depends in part on the application of mathematical principles and relies on the difficulty of factoring large numbers into their prime number components. Should a simpler factoring method be developed, then the security of encryption products utilizing public key cryptography technology could be reduced or eliminated. Even if no breakthroughs in factoring or other methods of attacking cryptographic systems are made, factoring problems can theoretically be solved by computer systems significantly faster and more powerful than those presently available. Any significant advance in techniques for attacking cryptographic systems could render some or all of our existing products and services obsolete or unmarketable.

Exports of software products utilizing encryption technology are generally restricted by the United States and various foreign governments. Cryptographic products typically require export licenses from United States government agencies. We are currently exporting software products and services with requisite export approval under United States law. However, the list of products and countries for which export approval is required, and the related regulatory policies, could be revised beyond their current scope, and we may not be able to obtain necessary approval for the export of our products. Our inability to obtain required approvals under these regulations could limit our ability to make international sales. Furthermore, our competitors may also seek to obtain approvals to export products that could increase the amount of competition we face.

In recent years the stock market in general, and the market for shares of small capitalization and technology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme price fluctuations, which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected companies. There can be no assurance that the market price of our common stock will not experience significant fluctuations in the future, including fluctuations unrelated to our performance. Such fluctuations could materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We develop products in the United States and market our products in North America, Europe and Asia/Pacific regions. As a result, our financial results could be affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. Because substantially all of our revenues are currently denominated in U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the dollar could make our products less competitive in foreign markets. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates, particularly since the majority of our investments are in short-term instruments, including money market funds and commercial paper, and long-term investments mature between one and two years. Our interest expense is also sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates because the interest rate charged on a portion of our long-term debt varies with the prime rate. Due to the nature of our investments and borrowings, we believe that we are not subject to any material exposure to interest rate fluctuations. A hypothetical change in interest rates of 100 basis points would have an immaterial effect on our operating results and cash flows.

A class action lawsuit was filed on December 3, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of our common stock alleging violations of federal securities laws. Lachance v. Valicert, Inc. et al., No. 01-CV-10889 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.), related to In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, No. 21 MC 92 (SAS). The case is brought purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased our common stock from July 27, 2000 through December 6, 2000. The complaint names as defendants the Company and two of its officers, and an investment banking firm that served as an underwriter for our initial public offering in July 2000.

The complaint alleges violations of Section 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 against all defendants and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against the underwriter on the grounds that the prospectus incorporated in the registration statement for the offering failed to disclose, among other things, that (i) the underwriter had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the underwriter allocated to those investors material portions of the shares of our stock sold in the initial public offering, and (ii) the underwriter had entered into agreements with customers whereby the underwriter agreed to allocate shares of our stock sold in the initial public offering to those customers in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional shares of our stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. No specific damages are claimed.

We are aware that similar allegations have been made in lawsuits relating to more than 300 other initial public offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000. Management believes that the allegations against us and our officers are without merit and intends to contest them vigorously. However, the litigation is in the preliminary stage, and its outcome cannot be predicted. The litigation process is inherently uncertain. If the outcome of the litigation is adverse to the Company and if, in addition, we were required to pay significant monetary damages in excess of available insurance, our business would be significantly harmed.


3.1		Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, as filed on January 22, 2001.

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, as filed on January 22, 2001.

4.1		Amended and Restated Rights Agreement dated as of July 21, 1999 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed on July 27, 2000.

4.2		Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 15, 2002 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed on July 25, 2001.

4.3		Escrow Agreement dated as of June 15, 2001 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed on July 25, 2001.

4.4		Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, as filed on December 6, 2001.

4.5		Form of Common Stock Warrant dated as of November 14, 2001 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, as filed on December 6, 2001.

4.6		Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 14, 2001 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, as filed on December 6, 2001.

4.7		Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of December 12, 2001 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3/A, as filed on January 18, 2002.

4.8		Registration Rights Agreement dated as of December 21, 2001 is incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3/A, as filed on January 18, 2002.

99.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer.

99.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer.

Delaware		94-3297861
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Class		Outstanding at July 31, 2002
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		25,553,935 shares

		Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	3

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001	5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	10

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	28

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	29

Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds	29

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	29

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders	29

Item 5.	Other Information	29

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	30

		Votes For		Votes Withheld
John Johnston		16,896,318		11,684

VALICERT, INC.

By:		/s/ TIMOTHY CONLEY
		Timothy Conley Chief Financial Officer

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents