Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly |
|
period ended June 30, 2002. |
¨ |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition |
Commission File Number 0-23441
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE |
|
94-3065014 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
5245 Hellyer Avenue, San Jose,
California 95138
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip code)
(408) 414-9200
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
|
Outstanding at July 31, 2002
|
Common Stock, $.001 par value |
|
28,467,338 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
Page
|
PART I. |
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Item 2. |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Item 3. |
|
|
|
21 |
|
PART II. |
|
OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Item 2. |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Item 3. |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Item 4. |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Item 5. |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Item 6. |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
TOPSwitch, TinySwitch and EcoSmart are trademarks
of Power Integrations, Inc.
2
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
60,738 |
|
|
$ |
62,141 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
35,640 |
|
|
|
14,724 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
8,310 |
|
|
|
5,124 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
14,001 |
|
|
|
23,622 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
5,346 |
|
|
|
5,346 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
125,262 |
|
|
|
112,483 |
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net |
|
|
20,652 |
|
|
|
23,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
145,914 |
|
|
$ |
135,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capitalized lease obligations |
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
440 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
4,278 |
|
|
|
4,641 |
|
Accrued payroll and related expenses |
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
Taxes payable and other accrued liabilities |
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
Deferred income on sales to distributors |
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
13,422 |
|
|
|
11,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG TERM LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long term liabilities |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
86,446 |
|
|
|
81,758 |
|
Stockholder notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
45,386 |
|
|
|
41,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
131,743 |
|
|
|
123,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
145,914 |
|
|
$ |
135,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three Months Ended June
30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
NET REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
26,861 |
|
$ |
20,985 |
|
$ |
50,251 |
|
$ |
46,806 |
License fees and royalties |
|
|
287 |
|
|
262 |
|
|
567 |
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
|
27,148 |
|
|
21,247 |
|
|
50,818 |
|
|
47,443 |
|
COST OF REVENUES |
|
|
15,758 |
|
|
11,893 |
|
|
29,126 |
|
|
24,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT |
|
|
11,390 |
|
|
9,354 |
|
|
21,692 |
|
|
22,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
3,648 |
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
7,255 |
|
|
7,242 |
Sales and marketing |
|
|
3,645 |
|
|
3,839 |
|
|
7,047 |
|
|
7,349 |
General and administrative |
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
2,981 |
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
8,841 |
|
|
8,969 |
|
|
17,283 |
|
|
17,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS |
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
385 |
|
|
4,409 |
|
|
5,442 |
|
OTHER INCOME, net |
|
|
493 |
|
|
572 |
|
|
898 |
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
3,042 |
|
|
957 |
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
6,536 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
913 |
|
|
287 |
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
$ |
670 |
|
$ |
3,715 |
|
$ |
4,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHARES USED IN PER SHARE CALCULATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
28,317 |
|
|
27,620 |
|
|
28,222 |
|
|
27,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
29,873 |
|
|
28,528 |
|
|
29,619 |
|
|
28,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,715 |
|
|
$ |
4,542 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
3,344 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
Deferred rent |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
Provision for accounts receivable and other allowances |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Tax benefit associated with employee stock plans and stock compensation to non-employees |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(3,327 |
) |
|
|
1,840 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
9,621 |
|
|
|
(1,261 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
(2,353 |
) |
Deferred income on sales to distributors |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
17,300 |
|
|
|
8,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(815 |
) |
|
|
(5,500 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(25,575 |
) |
|
|
(19,250 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and maturities of short-term investments |
|
|
4,659 |
|
|
|
17,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(21,731 |
) |
|
|
(7,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
Proceeds from stockholder note repayment |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments under capitalized lease obligations |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
2,343 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
62,141 |
|
|
|
36,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
60,738 |
|
|
$ |
38,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for (refunds of) income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
(1,203 |
) |
|
$ |
3,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The condensed consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Power Integrations, Inc. (the Company), a Delaware corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
While the financial information furnished is unaudited, the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report reflect
all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which the Company considers necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of the financial condition of the Company at the date
of the interim balance sheet. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year. Certain reclassifications were made to the prior year financial information to conform to the current period
presentation. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Power Integrations, Inc. consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001 included in its Form 10-K filed on March 22, 2002
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
The Company considers cash invested in highly liquid financial instruments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investments in highly
liquid financial instruments with original maturities greater than three months but not longer than fifteen months are classified as short-term investments. As of June 30, 2002, the Companys short-term investments consisted of U.S. government
backed securities, corporate commercial paper and other high quality commercial and municipal securities, which were classified as held-to-maturity and were valued using the amortized cost method which approximates market.
Revenue Recognition
Product revenues consist of sales to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, merchant power supply manufacturers and distributors. Revenues from product sales to OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers are recognized
upon shipment. Sales to distributors are made under terms allowing certain rights of return and protection against subsequent price declines on the Companys products held by the distributors. As a result of the Companys distributor
agreements, the Company defers recognition of revenue and the proportionate costs of revenues derived from sales to distributors until such distributors resell the Companys products to their customers. The margin deferred as a result of this
policy is reflected as deferred income on sales to distributors in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue
recognition and allowances for receivables and inventories. These estimates are based on historical facts and various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable at the time the estimates are made.
Comprehensive Income
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for reporting and the presentation of comprehensive income and its components. SFAS No. 130, requires companies to report a new measurement of
income to include unrealized gains and losses, net of the tax effect that have historically been excluded from net income and reflected instead in stockholders equity. Comprehensive income for the Company consists of net income
6
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
plus the effect of foreign currency translation adjustments, which was not material for the
six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001. Accordingly, comprehensive income closely approximates actual net income.
Segment Reporting
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information, establishes standards for reporting and the presentation of reportable business segments, i.e., the management approach. This approach requires that business segment information used by management to assess performance and
manage company resources be the source for information disclosure. On this basis, the Company is organized and operates as one business segmentthe design, development, manufacture and marketing of proprietary, high-voltage, analog integrated
circuits for use primarily in the AC to DC and DC to DC power conversion markets.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections Business Combinations. The provisions of SFAS No. l45 related to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 are effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002, and the provisions related to SFAS No. 13 are effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment
of Debt, and an amendment of that Statement, SFAS No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements. SFAS No. 145 also rescinds SFAS No. 44, Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers, and amends SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback
transactions. SFAS No. 145 also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a
significant impact on the Company.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 revises the accounting for specified employee and contract terminations that are part of restructuring activities. Companies will be able to record a liability for a cost associated
with an exit or disposal activity only when the liability is incurred and can be measured at fair value. Commitment to an exit plan or a plan of disposal expresses only managements intended future actions and therefore, does not meet the
requirement for recognizing a liability and related expense. This statement only applies to termination benefits offered for a specific termination event or a specified period. It will not affect accounting for the costs to terminate a capital
lease. The Company is required to adopt this statement for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a significant impact on the Company.
3. INVENTORIES:
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market and consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
424 |
|
$ |
1,571 |
Work-in-process |
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
12,528 |
Finished goods |
|
|
6,729 |
|
|
9,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,001 |
|
$ |
23,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
4. SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS AND EXPORT SALES:
Customer Concentration
The Companys end user base is highly concentrated and a relatively small number of OEMs and distributors accounted for a significant portion of the Companys net
revenues. Ten customers accounted for approximately 82.5% and 71.0% of total net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and approximately 81.5% and 71.3% of total net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002
and 2001, respectively.
The following customers accounted for more than 10% of total net revenues:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
Customer
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
A |
|
23.7 |
% |
|
27.2 |
% |
|
22.0 |
% |
|
24.2 |
% |
B |
|
13.9 |
% |
|
* |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
10.4 |
% |
C |
|
14.4 |
% |
|
* |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
* |
|
* |
|
less than 10% or no sales |
Customers A and B are distributors of the Companys products and customer C is an OEM.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash investments and trade receivables. The Company has cash investment policies that limit cash investments to short-term, low risk investments. With respect to trade receivables, the Company
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers financial condition and requires letters of credit whenever deemed necessary. Additionally, the Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the
credit risk of specific customers, historical trends related to past losses and other relevant information. As of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, approximately 84.0% and 75.2% of accounts receivable, respectively, were concentrated with ten
customers.
The following customers accounted for more than 10% of accounts receivables:
Customer
|
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
A |
|
32.8 |
% |
|
18.5 |
% |
B |
|
10.2 |
% |
|
10.2 |
% |
C |
|
11.9 |
% |
|
15.3 |
% |
8
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Export Sales
The Company markets its products in North America and in foreign countries through its sales personnel and a worldwide network of
independent sales representatives and distributors. As a percentage of total net revenues, export sales, which consist of domestic sales to customers in foreign countries, are comprised of the following:
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Hong Kong/China |
|
27.9 |
% |
|
34.7 |
% |
|
27.9 |
% |
|
29.8 |
% |
Taiwan |
|
25.9 |
% |
|
22.1 |
% |
|
25.2 |
% |
|
25.8 |
% |
Korea |
|
14.9 |
% |
|
9.5 |
% |
|
13.8 |
% |
|
9.2 |
% |
Singapore |
|
12.0 |
% |
|
6.5 |
% |
|
11.7 |
% |
|
3.6 |
% |
Europeexcluding Germany |
|
7.0 |
% |
|
9.6 |
% |
|
7.7 |
% |
|
11.3 |
% |
Germany |
|
5.2 |
% |
|
7.1 |
% |
|
6.3 |
% |
|
7.2 |
% |
Japan |
|
0.9 |
% |
|
2.3 |
% |
|
1.3 |
% |
|
1.9 |
% |
Other |
|
2.4 |
% |
|
2.4 |
% |
|
2.7 |
% |
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign |
|
96.2 |
% |
|
94.2 |
% |
|
96.6 |
% |
|
91.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales
Sales of the Companys TOPSwitch and TinySwitch products accounted for 99.2% and 98.0% of net revenues from product sales for the
three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and 99.0 % and 97.6% of net revenues from product sales for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. TOPSwitch products include TOPSwitch, TOPSwitch II, TOPSwitch FX and
TOPSwitch GX. TinySwitch products include TinySwitch and TinySwitch II.
9
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
5. EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Earnings per share are calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. SFAS No. 128 requires companies to
compute earnings per share under two different methods (basic and diluted). Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are
calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average shares of outstanding common stock and common stock equivalents during the period. Common stock equivalents included in the diluted calculation consist of dilutive shares issuable upon the
exercise of outstanding common stock options and shares issuable under the employee stock purchase plan using the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
Three Months Ended June
30,
|
|
Six Months Ended June
30,
|
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
$ |
670 |
|
$ |
3,715 |
|
$ |
4,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares |
|
|
28,317 |
|
|
27,620 |
|
|
28,222 |
|
|
27,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
$ |
670 |
|
$ |
3,715 |
|
$ |
4,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares |
|
|
28,317 |
|
|
27,620 |
|
|
28,222 |
|
|
27,571 |
Weighted average common share equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
907 |
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
922 |
Employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
8 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares |
|
|
29,873 |
|
|
28,528 |
|
|
29,619 |
|
|
28,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES:
Income tax expense for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 includes a provision for Federal, state and foreign taxes based
on the annual estimated effective tax rate applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries for the year. The difference between the Federal statutory rate of 35% and the Companys effective tax rate of 30% for the six months ended June 30, 2002
and 2001 is primarily due to the beneficial impact of international sales, research and development credits and Federal tax-exempt investments.
10
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a number of forward-looking
statements, which reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. In this report, the words will, expects, believe, should, anticipate,
outlook, if, future and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and our potential financial performance and are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties, including our development efforts, the success of our product strategies, the maintenance of significant business relationships, as well as those discussed in the Factors That May Affect Future Results of
Operations and elsewhere in this report. As a result of these risks, our actual results may differ materially from our historical or anticipated results. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which
speak only as of the date of this report.
The following managements discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Overview
We design, develop, manufacture and market proprietary, high-voltage, analog integrated circuits, or ICs, for use primarily in AC to DC power conversion markets. We have targeted high-volume power supply markets, including
the communications, consumer, computer and industrial electronics markets. Our initial focus is on those applications that are sensitive to size, portability, energy efficiency and time-to-market. We introduced the TOPSwitch family of ICs in 1994
followed by an enhanced family of ICs, TOPSwitch-II, in April 1997. In September 1998, we announced the TinySwitch family of integrated circuits for power supplies used in a broad range of electronic products. TinySwitch ICs, which are designed to
reduce standby energy by incorporating our new EcoSmart technology, enable a new class of light, compact, energy-efficient power supplies. In March 2000, we introduced the TOPSwitch-FX family of products, which also incorporates our EcoSmart
technology to help engineers meet the growing need for environmentally friendly power solutions. In November 2000, we introduced the TOPSwitch-GX family of products. The GX family is capable of supplying output levels from 6 watts to 290 watts In
March 2001, we introduced the TinySwitch-II family of products with power levels ranging from 3 watts to 20 watts. In June 2002, we introduced DPA-Switch, which is a family of products that is the first highly integrated high-voltage power
conversion IC designed specifically for use in DC-DC converters and distributed power architectures (DPAs). The four-device family covers a wide input voltage range of 16V to 75V, targeting 24 V/48V applications All of our products introduced since
1998 incorporate our EcoSmart technology.
Critical Accounting Policies
We believe our critical accounting policies are as follows:
|
|
|
estimating sales, returns and allowances; |
|
|
|
estimating ship and debit reserve; |
|
|
|
estimating allowance for doubtful accounts; and |
|
|
|
estimating reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On
an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, sales returns, allowance for ship and debit, bad debts and inventories. We base our estimates on historical facts and various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable at the time the estimates are made. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
11
A brief description of these policies is set forth below.
Revenue recognition
Product revenues consist of sales to OEMs, merchant power supply manufacturers and distributors. Revenues from product sales to OEMs and merchant power supply manufacturers are recognized upon
shipment. At that time, we provide for estimated sales returns and other allowances related to those sales. Between 45% and 55% of our sales are made to distributors under terms allowing certain rights of return and price protection for our products
held in the distributors inventories. Therefore, we defer recognition of revenue and the proportionate cost of revenues derived from sales to distributors until the distributors sell our products to their customers. We evaluate the amounts to
defer based on the level of actual distributors inventory on hand as well as inventory that is in transit. The gross profit deferred as a result of this policy is reflected as deferred income on sales to distributors in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Estimating sales returns and allowances
Net revenue consists of product revenue reduced by estimated sales returns and allowances. To estimate sales returns and
allowances, we analyze, both when we initially establish the reserve, and then each quarter when we review the adequacy of the reserve, the following factors: historical returns, current economic trends, levels of inventories of our products held by
our customers, and changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products. This reserve is reflected as a reduction to accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Increases to the reserve are recorded as a reduction to
net revenue. Because the reserve for sales returns and allowances is based on our judgments and estimates, particularly as to future customer demand and acceptance of our products, our reserves may not be adequate to cover actual sales
returns and other allowances. If our reserves are not adequate, our net revenues could be adversely affected.
Estimating ship and debit reserve
A large portion of our sales is made to
distributors. Under certain circumstances, some of those sales are subject to credits that distributors claim on certain transactions and as protection against subsequent price declines on products they hold. The credits are referred to as
ship and debits. The credits are available to the distributors after they have sold our products through to their end customer. We maintain a reserve for these credits that appears as a reduction to accounts receivable in our
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Any increase in the reserve results in a corresponding reduction in our net revenues. To establish the adequacy of the reserve, we analyze historical ship and debit payments and levels of inventory in the
distributor channels. If our reserves are not adequate, our net revenues could be adversely affected.
Estimating allowance for doubtful accounts
We maintain an allowance for losses we
may incur as a result of our customers inability to make required payments. Any increase in the allowance results in a corresponding increase in our general and administrative expenses. In establishing this allowance, and then evaluating the
adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts each quarter, we analyze historical bad debt, customer concentrations, customer credit-worthiness, current economic trends and changes in our customer payment terms. If the financial condition of one
or more of our customers unexpectedly deteriorated, resulting in their inability to make payments, or if we otherwise underestimate the losses we incur as a result of our customers inability to pay us, we could be required to increase our
allowance for doubtful accounts which could adversely affect our operating results.
Estimating reserve for
excess and obsolete inventory
We identify excess and obsolete products and analyze historical usage,
forecasted production based on demand forecasts, current economic trends, and historical write-offs when evaluating the adequacy of the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. This reserve is reflected as a reduction to inventory in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and an increase in cost of revenues. If actual market conditions are less favorable than our assumptions, we may be required to take additional reserves, which could adversely impact our cost of revenues and
operating results.
12
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain operating data as a percentage of total net revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
Percentage of Total Net Revenues for Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Percentage of Total Net Revenues for Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
98.9 |
% |
|
98.8 |
% |
|
98.9 |
% |
|
98.7 |
% |
License fees and royalties |
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
100.0 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
100.0 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
58.0 |
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
52.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
42.0 |
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
13.5 |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
15.2 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
13.4 |
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
15.5 |
|
General and administrative |
|
5.7 |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
32.6 |
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
9.4 |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
11.5 |
|
Other income, net |
|
1.8 |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
11.2 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
3.4 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
7.8 |
% |
|
3.2 |
% |
|
7.3 |
% |
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2001
Net revenues. Net revenues consist of revenues from product sales, which are
calculated net of returns and allowances, plus license fees and royalties paid by licensees of our technology. Net revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 were $27.1 million compared to $21.2 million for the second quarter of 2001, an increase
of $5.9 million, or 27.8%. Net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 were $50.8 million compared to $47.4 million for the comparable period of 2001, an increase of $3.4 million or 7.1%.
Net revenues from product sales represented $26.9 million and $21.0 million in the second quarter of 2002 and 2001, respectively. Net revenues from product sales
represented $50.3 million and $46.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The increase in net revenues from product sales for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2002 was driven by increased sales of our
products across all of our end markets. Sales increases were primarily from LCD monitors and PDAs in the computer market, home appliances and DVDs in the consumer market, cell phone chargers in the communications market and motor control and
uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) in the industrial market. We expect our full year revenue mix for 2002, as a percentage of net revenues in the end markets which we serve, to be approximately 39% in the communications category, 26% in the
consumer market category, 23% in the computer category, 6% in the industrial category and 6% in the all other category. This compares to approximately 36% in the communications category, 31% in the consumer market category, 19% in the computer
category, 7% in the industrial category and 7% in the all other category for the full year of 2001. We also expect the mix of our product families for the full year to be approximately 35% for TOPSwitch and TOPSwitch II, 40% for TinySwitch and
TinySwitch II and 24% for TOPSwitch FX and GX. This compares to approximately 60% for TOPSwitch and TOPSwitch II, 23% for TinySwitch and TinySwitch II and 16% for TOPSwitch FX and GX for the full year of 2001.
International sales were $26.1 million in the second quarter of 2002 compared to $20.0 million for the same period in 2001, an increase of
$6.1 million, or 30.5%, which represented 96.2% of net revenues compared to 94.2%
13
in the comparable period of 2001. International sales were $49.1 million for the six months ended June
30, 2002 compared to $43.4 million for the same period in 2001, an increase of $5.7 million, or 13.1%, which represented 96.6% of net revenues compared to 91.4% in the comparable period of 2001. The increase in our international sales for the three
months and six months ended June 30, 2002 was driven by increased sales of our products across all of our end markets. Although the power supplies using our products are designed and distributed worldwide, most of these power supplies are
manufactured in Asia. As a result, sales to this region were 83.6% and 77.4% of our product sales for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and 82.0% and 72.5% of our product sales for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and
2001, respectively. We expect international sales to continue to account for a large portion of our net revenues.
Direct sales for the second quarter of 2002 were divided 52.5% to distributors and 47.5% to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, and power supply merchants, compared to 48.7% to distributors and 51.3% to OEMs and power supply
merchants for the same quarter in 2001. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, direct sales were divided 54.9% to distributors and 45.1% to OEMs and power supply merchants, compared to 51.4% to distributors and 48.6 % to OEMs and power supply
merchants for the same period in 2001. For the quarter ended June 30, 2002, sales to one customer accounted for 23.7% of net revenues, compared to 27.2% of net revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. A second customer accounted for 13.9% of
net revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, and for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, sales to that customer were less than 10%. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, sales to these two customers accounted for 22.0% and 15.2% of net revenues
respectively, compared to 24.2% and 10.4% of net revenues, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2001. Both of these customers are distributors. One other customer, who is an OEM, accounted for 14.4% of net revenues for the quarter ended
June 30, 2002 and 14.0% of net revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Sales to this customer for both the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2001 were less than 10%. There were no other customers accounting for sales of more than 10%
during the periods reported.
Cost of revenues; Gross profit. Gross profit is equal
to net revenues less cost of revenues. Our cost of revenues consists primarily of costs associated with the purchase of wafers, the assembly and packaging of our products, and internal labor and overhead associated with the testing of both wafers
and packaged components. Gross profit for the second quarter of 2002 was $11.4 million, or 42.0% of net revenues, compared to $9.4 million, or 44.0% of net revenues for the same period in 2001. Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2002 was
$21.7 million, or 42.7% of net revenues, compared to $22.8 million, or 48.0% of net revenues for the same period in 2001. The decrease in gross profit percentage for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2002 was due primarily to
manufacturing inefficiencies associated with the initial ramping of new products and the adverse impact of increased customer pricing pressure. We expect our gross profit percentage to remain in a range of 42% to 45% over the next few quarters, but
we cannot assure you that we will be able to accomplish these results.
Research and development
expenses. Research and development expenses consist primarily of employee-related expenses, expensed material and facility costs associated with the development of new processes and new products. We also expense prototype
wafers and mask sets related to new products as research and development costs until new products are released to production. Research and development expenses for the second quarter of 2002 were $3.6 million compared to $3.7 million for the same
period in 2001, a decrease of $0.1 million, or 1.3%, which represented 13.5% and 17.4% of our net revenues in each period, respectively. Research and development expenses for the first six months of 2002 were $7.3 million compared to $7.2 million
for the same period in 2001, an increase of $0.1 million, or 0.2%, which represented 14.3% and 15.2% of net revenues in each period, respectively. Expenditures for research and development costs were essentially unchanged from the quarter and six
months ended June 30, 2001. We expect research and development expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars but to fluctuate as a percentage of our net revenues.
Sales and marketing expenses. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of employee-related expenses, commissions to sales
representatives and facilities expenses, including expenses associated with our regional sales offices and applications engineering. Sales and marketing expenses for the second quarter of 2002 were $3.6 million compared to $3.8 million for the same
period in 2001, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 5.1%, which represented 13.4% and 18.1% of our net revenues in each period, respectively. Sales and marketing expenses for the first six months of 2002 were $7.0 million compared to $7.3 million for the
same period in 2001, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 4.1%, which represented 13.9% and 15.5% of our net revenues in each period, respectively. Included in the above marketing expenses are costs associated with applications engineering, which
represented $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and $1.8 million in each of the six months
14
ended June 30, 2002 and 2001. We include applications engineering costs as part of sales and marketing
expenses due to the fact that our products are generally incorporated into a customers power supply at the design stage. Our sales and marketing efforts are focused on facilitating the customers use of our products in the design of new
power supplies for specific applications. An important competitive factor in determining whether a customer decides to use our products in its designs is our commitment to provide comprehensive application design support. We expect sales and
marketing expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars but to fluctuate as a percentage of our net revenues.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of employee-related expenses for administration, finance, human resources and general management, as well as
consulting fees, outside services, legal fees, auditing and tax services. For the quarters ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, general and administrative expenses were $1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively, which represented 5.7% and 6.7% of our net
revenues in each period. For the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, general and administrative expenses were $3.0 million and $2.7 million, respectively, which represented 5.8% of our net revenues in both periods. The increase in spending
through June 30, 2002, was attributable primarily to an increase in professional and legal expenses. Included in legal expenses are outside costs related to patents, which have been expensed as incurred, and we plan to continue with this policy in
the future. For the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, those costs were approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. We expect general and administrative expenses to increase in absolute dollars, but to fluctuate as a percentage
of our net revenues.
Other income, net. Other income, net, for the second quarter
of 2002 decreased by $79,000 compared to the same period in 2001 and for the six months ended June 30, 2002, other income, net, decreased by $196, 000 compared to the same period in 2001. The decrease for each of the three and six month periods
ended June 30, 2002 was due primarily to lower interest rates on our cash equivalents and short-term investments in 2002 compared to 2001.
Provision for income taxes. Provision for income taxes represents Federal, state and foreign taxes. The provision for income taxes was $0.9 million for the second quarter of 2002 compared to
$0.3 million for the same period in 2001. The provision for income taxes was $1.6 million for the first six months of 2002 compared to $2.0 million for the same period in 2001. Our estimated effective tax rate used for both 2002 and 2001 was 30%.
The difference between the statutory rate of 35% and our effective tax rate of 30% for the periods presented is due primarily to the beneficial impact of international sales, research and development credits and Federal tax-exempt investments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2002, we had approximately $96.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, an increase of approximately $19.5 million from December 31, 2001. In addition, under a
revolving line of credit with Union Bank of California, we can borrow up to $10.0 million. Approximately $3.8 million of the credit line is used to cover advances for standby letters of credit, which we provide to Matsushita and OKI prior to the
shipment of wafers by these foundries to us. The balance of this credit line was unused and available as of June 30, 2002. The line of credit agreement, which expires on July 1, 2004, contains financial covenants requiring that we maintain
profitability on a quarterly basis and not pay or declare dividends without the banks prior consent. As of June 30, 2002, we were in compliance with these financial covenants. We have previously financed a significant portion of our machinery
and equipment through capital equipment leases. The amounts due for these obligations for the next 12 months were $0.2 million as of June 30, 2002. The remaining balance due for these obligations was $0.2 million. There was no additional equipment
financing during the six months ended June 30, 2002.
As of June 30, 2002, we had working capital, defined as
current assets less current liabilities, of approximately $111.8 million, an increase of approximately $11.0 million from December 31, 2001. Our operating activities generated cash of $17.3 million and $8.2 million in the six months ended June 30,
2002 and 2001, respectively. Cash generated in the first six months of 2002 was principally the result of net income in the amount of $3.7 million, depreciation and amortization, a decrease in inventory and an increase in accrued liabilities,
partially offset by an increase in accounts receivable. Cash generated in the first six months of 2001 was principally the result of net income in the amount of $4.5 million, depreciation and amortization and decreases in accounts receivable and
prepaid expenses, partially offset by an increase in inventory and a decrease in accrued liabilities.
15
Our investing activities were a net transfer to short-term investments from cash
and cash equivalents of $20.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002, and a net transfer to short-term investments from cash and cash equivalents of $1.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002. Purchases of property and equipment were
$0.8 million and $5.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Our financing
activities were primarily receipts from the issuance of common stock through the exercise of stock options and purchases through our employee stock purchase plan of $3.3 million and $1.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001,
respectively, offset by payments for capitalized lease obligations of $0.3 million and $0.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2001, respectively.
During the first six months of 2002, a significant portion of our cash flow was generated by our operations. If our operating results deteriorate during 2002, as a result of decrease in customer
demand, or severe pricing pressures from our customers or our competitors, or for other reasons, our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations may be jeopardized. In that case, we may be forced to use our cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments to fund our operations. We believe that cash generated from operations, together with existing sources of liquidity, will satisfy our projected working capital and other cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections Business Combinations. The provisions of SFAS No. l45 related to the rescission of SFAS No. 4 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002, and the provisions related to SFAS No. 13
are effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, and an amendment of that Statement, SFAS No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy
Sinking-Fund Requirements. SFAS No. 145 also rescinds SFAS No. 44, Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers, and amends SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback
transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS No. 145 also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical
corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a significant impact on the Company.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. SFAS No. 146 revises the accounting for specified
employee and contract terminations that are part of restructuring activities. Companies will be able to record a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity only when the liability is incurred and can be measured at fair value.
Commitment to an exit plan or a plan of disposal expresses only managements intended future actions and therefore, does not meet the requirement for recognizing a liability and related expense. This statement only applies to termination
benefits offered for a specific termination event or a specified period. It will not affect accounting for the costs to terminate a capital lease. The Company is required to adopt this statement for exit or disposal activities initiated after
December 31, 2002. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a significant impact on the Company.
Factors That May Affect
Future Results of Operations
In addition to the other information in this report, the following factors
should be considered carefully in evaluating our business before purchasing shares of our stock.
Our
quarterly operating results are volatile and difficult to predict. If we fail to meet the expectations of public market analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock may decrease significantly. Our net
revenues and operating results have varied significantly in the past, are difficult to forecast, are subject to numerous factors both within and outside of our control, and may fluctuate significantly in the future. As a result, our quarterly
operating results could fall below the expectations of public market analysts or investors. If that occurs, the price of our stock may decline.
16
Some of the factors that could affect our operating results include the
following:
|
|
|
the volume and timing of orders received from customers; |
|
|
|
the volume and timing of orders placed by us with our foundries; |
|
|
|
changes in product mix including the impact of new product introduction on existing products; |
|
|
|
our ability to develop and bring to market new products and technologies on a timely basis; |
|
|
|
the timing of investments in research and development and sales and marketing; |
|
|
|
cyclical semiconductor industry conditions; and |
|
|
|
fluctuations in exchange rates, particularly the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen. |
We do not have long-term contracts with any of our customers and if they fail to place, or if they cancel or reschedule orders for our
products, our operating results and business may suffer. Our business is characterized by short-term customer orders and shipment schedules. The ordering patterns of some of our existing large customers have been
unpredictable in the past, and we expect that customer-ordering patterns will continue to be unpredictable in the future. Not only does the volume of units ordered by particular customers vary substantially from period to period, but also purchase
orders received from particular customers often vary substantially from early oral estimates provided by those customers for planning purposes. In addition, customer orders can be canceled or rescheduled without significant penalty to the customer.
In the past we have experienced customer cancellations of substantial orders for reasons beyond our control, and significant cancellations could occur again at any time.
Intense competition in the high-voltage power supply industry may lead to a decrease in the average selling price and reduced sales volume of our products, which may
harm our business. The high-voltage power supply industry is intensely competitive and characterized by significant price erosion. Our products face competition from alternative technologies, including traditional linear
transformers and discrete switcher power supplies. If the price of competing products decreases significantly, the cost effectiveness of our products will be adversely affected. If power requirements for applications in which our products are
currently utilized go outside the cost effective range of our products, these older alternative technologies can be used more cost effectively.
We cannot assure you that our products will continue to compete favorably or that we will be successful in the face of increasing competition from new products and enhancements introduced by existing
competitors or new companies entering this market. We believe our failure to compete successfully in the high-voltage power supply business, including our ability to introduce new products with higher average selling prices, would materially harm
our operating results.
If demand for our products declines in the major end markets that we serve, our net
revenues will decrease. Applications of our products in the consumer, communications and computer end markets, such as cellular phone chargers, stand-by power supplies for PCs and main power supplies for TV set top boxes
have and will continue to account for a large percentage of our net revenues. We expect that a significant level of our net revenues and operating results will continue to be dependent upon these applications in the near term. The demand for these
products has been highly cyclical and has been subject to significant economic downturns at various times. The announcements of economic slowdown by major companies in some of the end markets we serve, indirectly through our customers, have caused a
slowdown in demand for some of our ICs. When our customers are not successful in maintaining high levels of demand for their products, their demand for our ICs decreases, which adversely affects our operating results. Any significant downturn in
demand in these markets would cause our net revenues to decline and could cause the price of our stock to fall.
Because the sales cycle for our products can be lengthy, we may incur substantial expenses before we generate significant revenues, if any. Our products are generally incorporated into a customers
products at the design stage. However, customer decisions to use our products, commonly referred to as design wins, which can often require us to expend significant research and development and sales and marketing resources without any assurance of
success, often precede volume sales, if any, by a year or more. The value of any design win will largely depend upon the commercial success of the customers product. We cannot assure you that we will continue to achieve design wins or that any
design win will result in future revenues. If a customer decides at the design stage not to incorporate our
17
products into its product, we may not have another opportunity for a design win with respect to that
product for many months or years.
Our products must meet exacting specifications, and undetected defects and
failures may occur which could cause customers to return or stop buying our products. Our customers generally establish demanding specifications for quality, performance and reliability that our products must meet. ICs as
complex as those we sell often encounter development delays and may contain undetected defects or failures when first introduced or after commencement of commercial shipments. We have from time to time in the past experienced product quality,
performance or reliability problems. If defects and failures occur in our products, we could experience lost revenue, increased costs, including warranty expense and costs associated with customer support, delays in or cancellations or rescheduling
of orders or shipments and product returns or discounts, any of which would harm our operating results.
Our international sales activities account for a substantial portion of our net revenues and subject us to substantial risks. Sales to customers outside of the United States account for a large portion
of our net revenues, including approximately 97% of our net revenues in the six months ended June 30, 2002. If our international sales declined and we were unable to increase domestic sales, our revenues would decline and our operating results would
be harmed. International sales involve a number of risks to us, including:
|
|
|
potential insolvency of international distributors and representatives; |
|
|
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; |
|
|
|
the impact of recessionary environments in economies outside the United States; |
|
|
|
tariffs and other trade barriers and restrictions; and |
|
|
|
the burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws. |
Our failure to adequately address these risks could reduce our international sales, which would materially adversely affect our operating results. Furthermore, because
substantially all of our foreign sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, increases in the value of the dollar increase the price in local currencies of our products in foreign markets and make our products relatively more expensive and less price
competitive than competitors products that are priced in local currencies.
We depend on third-party
suppliers to provide us with wafers for our products and if they fail to provide us sufficient wafers, our business will suffer. We have supply arrangements for the production of wafers with Matsushita and OKI. Although
certain aspects of our relationships with Matsushita and OKI are contractual, many important aspects of these relationships depend on their continued cooperation and, in many instances, their course of conduct deviates from the literal provisions of
the contracts. We cannot assure you that we will continue to work successfully with Matsushita or OKI in the future, that they will continue to provide us with sufficient capacity at their foundries to meet our needs, or that either of them will not
seek an early termination of its wafer supply agreement with us. We estimate that it would take 9 to 12 months from the time we identified an alternate manufacturing source before that source could produce wafers with acceptable manufacturing yields
in sufficient quantities to meet our needs.
Although we provide Matsushita and OKI with rolling forecasts
of our production requirements, their ability to provide wafers to us is limited by the available capacities of the foundries in which these wafers are manufactured. An increased need for capacity to meet internal demands or demands of other
customers could cause Matsushita and OKI to reduce capacity available to us. Matsushita and OKI may also require us to pay amounts in excess of contracted or anticipated amounts for wafer deliveries or require us to make other concessions in order
to acquire the wafer supply necessary to meet our customers requirements. Any of these concessions could harm our business.
If our third-party suppliers and independent subcontractors do not produce our wafers and assemble our finished products at acceptable yields, our net revenues may decline. We depend on Matsushita and
OKI to produce wafers, and independent subcontractors to assemble finished products, at acceptable yields and to deliver them to us
18
in a timely manner. The failure of Matsushita or OKI to supply us wafers at acceptable yields could
prevent us from selling our products to our customers and would likely cause a decline in our net revenues. In addition, our IC assembly process requires our manufacturers to use a high-voltage molding compound available from only one vendor, and
which is difficult to process. This compound and its required processes, together with the other non-standard materials and processes needed to assemble our products, require a more exacting level of process control than normally required for
standard packages. Unavailability of the sole source compound or problems with the assembly process can materially adversely affect yields and cost to manufacture. We cannot assure you that acceptable yields will be maintainable in the future.
Matsushita has licenses to our technology, which it may use to our detriment. Our
ability to take advantage of the Japanese market for our products is largely dependent on Matsushita and its ability to promote and deliver our products. Pursuant to our agreement with Matsushita, it has the right to manufacture and sell products
using our technology to Japanese companies worldwide and to subsidiaries of Japanese companies located in Asia. Although we receive royalties on Matsushitas sales, these royalties are substantially lower than the gross profit we would receive
on direct sales. We cannot assure you that Matsushita will not use the technology rights we have granted it to develop or market competing products following any termination of its relationship with us or after termination of Matsushitas
royalty obligation to us.
If our efforts to enhance existing products and introduce new products are not
successful, we may not be able to generate demand for our products. Our success depends in significant part upon our ability to develop new ICs for high-voltage power conversion for existing and new markets, to introduce
these products in a timely manner and to have these products selected for design into products of leading manufacturers. New product introduction schedules are subject to the risks and uncertainties that typically accompany development and delivery
of complex technologies to the market place, including product development delays and defects. If we fail to develop and sell new products in a timely manner, our net revenues could decline.
We cannot be sure that we will be able to adjust to changing market demands as quickly and cost-effectively as necessary to compete
successfully. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that we will be able to introduce new products in a timely and cost-effective manner or in sufficient quantities to meet customer demand or that these products will achieve market acceptance. Our
failure, or our customers failure to develop and introduce new products successfully and in a timely manner would harm our business and may cause the price of our common stock to fall. In addition, customers may defer or return orders for
existing products in response to the introduction of new products. Although we maintain reserves against returns, we cannot assure you that these reserves will be adequate.
We rely on a continuous supply of power to conduct operations, and any disruption in the availability of power supplied to us could interrupt our operations, increase
our expenses and harm our business. In 2000 and 2001, California experienced an energy crisis which caused the state to implement periodic rolling blackouts throughout California. Most of our operations are located in
California, although part of our inventory is stored and shipped from an overseas facility. We currently have only limited backup generators for emergency alternate sources of power in the event of a blackout. If blackouts interrupt our supply of
power, we would be temporarily unable to continue operations at our facilities. Any such interruption in our ability to continue operations at our facilities could delay shipments of our products to customers, and could result in lost revenue, which
could harm our business and results of operations.
If our products do not penetrate additional markets,
our business will not grow as we predict. We believe that our future success depends in part upon our ability to penetrate additional markets for our products. We cannot assure you that we will be able to overcome the
marketing or technological challenges necessary to do so. To the extent that a competitor penetrates additional markets before we do, or takes market share from us in our existing markets, our net revenues and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected.
In the event of an earthquake, terrorist act or other disaster, our operations may be
interrupted and our business would be harmed. Our principal executive offices and operating facilities are located near San Francisco, California. This area has been subject to severe earthquakes. In the event of an
earthquake, we may be temporarily unable to continue operations at our facilities and we may suffer significant property damage. Any such interruption in our ability to continue operations at our facilities could delay the development and shipment
of our products.
19
Like other U.S. companies, our business and operating results are subject to
uncertainties arising out of the recent terrorist attacks on the United States, including the potential worsening or extension of the current global economic slowdown, the economic consequences of current and potential military actions or additional
terrorist activities and associated political instability, and the impact of heightened security concerns on domestic and international travel and commerce. Such uncertainties could also lead to delays or cancellations of customer orders, a general
decrease in corporate spending or our inability to effectively market and sell our products. Any of these results could substantially harm our business and results of operations, causing a decrease in our revenues.
If we are unable to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, we could lose market share, incur costly litigation
expenses or lose valuable assets. Our success depends upon our ability to protect our intellectual property, including patents, trade secrets, and know-how, and to continue our technological innovation. We cannot assure
you that the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property will be adequate to prevent misappropriation or that others will not develop competitive technologies or products. From time to time we have received, and we may receive in the
future, communications alleging possible infringement of patents or other intellectual property rights of others. Litigation, which could result in substantial cost to us, may be necessary to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights
or to defend us against claimed infringement of the rights of others. The failure to obtain necessary licenses or other rights or litigation arising out of infringement claims could cause us to lose market share and harm our business.
Moreover, the laws of some foreign countries in which our technology is or may in the future be licensed
may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, thus increasing the possibility of infringement of our intellectual property.
We must attract and retain qualified personnel to be successful and competition for qualified personnel is intense in our market. Our success
depends to a significant extent upon the continued service of our executive officers and other key management and technical personnel, and on our ability to continue to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, such as experienced analog
design engineers and systems applications engineers. The competition for these employees is intense, particularly in Silicon Valley. The loss of the services of one or more of our engineers, executive officers or other key personnel or our inability
to recruit replacements for these individuals or to otherwise attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel could harm our business. We have neither long-term employment contracts with, nor key person life insurance policies on, any of our
employees.
We have adopted anti-takeover measures, which may make it more difficult for a third party
to acquire us. Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences and privileges of those shares without any further vote or action
by the stockholders. The rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of shares of preferred stock, while
potentially providing flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions and for other corporate purposes, could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. We have no
present intention to issue shares of preferred stock.
In February 1999, our board of directors adopted a
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights Plan intended to guard against hostile takeover tactics. The adoption of this plan was not in response to any proposal to acquire us, and the board is not aware of any such effort. The existence of this plan could
have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock.
The future trading price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors. The price of our common stock has been, and is likely to be, volatile. Factors
including future announcements concerning us or our competitors, quarterly variations in operating results, announcements of technological innovations, the introduction of new products or changes in our product pricing policies or those of our
competitors, proprietary rights or other litigation, changes in earnings estimates by analysts and other factors could cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially. In addition, stock prices for many technology companies
fluctuate widely for reasons, which may be unrelated to operating results. These fluctuations, as well as general economic, market and political conditions, may harm the market price of our common stock.
20
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISKS.
There has not been a material change in our exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risks since the date of our 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We do not use
derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We invest in high-credit quality issuers and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. As stated in our policy, we ensure the safety and preservation of our
invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in safe and high-credit quality securities and by constantly positioning our portfolio to respond appropriately to a
significant reduction in a credit rating of any investment issuer, guarantor or depository. The portfolio includes only marketable securities with active secondary or resale markets to ensure portfolio liquidity.
The table below presents carrying value and related weighted average interest rates for our investment portfolio at June 30, 2002. All
investments mature, by policy, in 15 months or less.
(in thousands, except average interest
rates)
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Average Interest Rate
|
|
Cash Equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable securities |
|
$ |
41,668 |
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash equivalents |
|
|
41,668 |
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. corporate securities |
|
|
22,392 |
|
2.77 |
% |
U.S. government securities |
|
|
12,209 |
|
2.79 |
% |
Tax-exempt securities |
|
|
1,039 |
|
3.33 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
|
35,640 |
|
2.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities |
|
$ |
77,308 |
|
2.59 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. We
transact business in various foreign countries. Our primary foreign currency cash flows are in Asia and Western Europe. Currently, we do not employ a foreign currency hedge program utilizing foreign currency forward exchange contracts as the foreign
currency transactions and risks to date have not been significant. We do maintain a Japanese yen account with a U. S. Bank for payments to suppliers and for cash receipts from Japanese suppliers and customers denominated in Japanese yen.
21
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At
the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Power Integrations, Inc. held on June 6, 2002, the following proposals were adopted by the margins indicated.
Proposal ITo elect the following persons as a Class II director to hold office for a three-year term and until his successor is elected and qualified:
|
|
Voted For
|
|
|
|
Withheld
|
E. Floyd Kvamme |
|
25,784,820 |
|
|
|
414,725 |
Nicholas E. Brathwaithe |
|
25,602,062 |
|
|
|
597,483 |
Balu Balakrishnan |
|
25,552,679 |
|
|
|
646,866 |
The remaining directors are Howard F. Earhart and Alan D. Bickell
(terms expiring in 2003) and R. Scott Brown and Steven J. Sharp (terms expiring in 2004).
Proposal IITo
approve an amendment to our 1997 Stock Option Plan, which provides that effective January 1, 2003, 700,000 shares, which would otherwise only be available for grant under such plan pursuant to non-statutory stock options, may instead be granted
pursuant to incentive stock options:
Voted For
|
|
Voted Against
|
|
Abstain
|
18,662,943 |
|
7,494,630 |
|
41,972 |
None.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
a. Exhibits.
Exhibit Number
|
|
Description
|
|
99.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
99.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
b. Reports on Form 8-K.
Current Report on Form 8-K on June 28, 2002, as amended on Form 8-K/A on July 10, 2002, regarding a change in our certifying
accountant.
22
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 14, 2002
POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. |
|
By: |
|
/s/ JOHN M. COBB
|
|
|
John M. Cobb Chief Financial Officer |
23