Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 2, 2005
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ________ to ________
Commission file number 1-16699
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEVADA 75-2590292
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)
2727 EAST VERNON AVENUE
VERNON, CALIFORNIA 90058
------------------ -----
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(323) 582-9977
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
NOT APPLICABLE
(FORMER NAME, FORMER ADDRESS AND FORMER FISCAL YEAR,
IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of February 9, 2005, there were 14,805,556 shares of the issuer's common
stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 2, 2005
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Page No.
- ------------------------------ --------
Item 1. Financial Statements
Condensed Balance Sheets as of January 2, 2005 (unaudited) and
September 26, 2004 2
Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended
January 2, 2005 and December 28, 2003 (unaudited) 4
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended
January 2, 2005 and December 28, 2003 (unaudited) 5
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited) 8
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations 12
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 17
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 17
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
- ---------------------------
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 18
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 18
Item 6. Exhibits 18
SIGNATURES 19
EXHIBITS FILED WITH THIS FORM 10-Q 20
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
January 2, September 26,
2005 2004
------------- -------------
(Unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash $ 1,156,450 $ 1,609,417
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $102,000
and $125,000, respectively 14,213,193 12,606,122
Inventories 11,887,481 11,228,548
Prepaid expenses and other 1,582,442 1,641,333
Deferred income taxes 690,380 690,380
------------- -------------
Total current assets 29,529,946 27,775,800
------------- -------------
Property and equipment, at cost:
Fixtures and equipment 12,413,304 13,096,349
Leasehold improvements 9,059,661 9,066,829
Automotive equipment 52,669 52,669
------------- -------------
21,525,634 22,215,847
Less accumulated depreciation (9,063,612) (9,597,566)
------------- -------------
12,462,022 12,618,281
------------- -------------
Other assets:
Excess of cost over value of net assets acquired 12,188,435 12,188,435
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $257,000 and
$199,000, respectively 656,626 710,297
Deferred income taxes 3,569,298 3,935,242
Other 2,163,670 2,321,514
------------- -------------
18,578,029 19,155,488
------------- -------------
Total assets $ 60,569,997 $ 59,549,569
============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed financial statements.
-2-
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
January 2, September 26,
2005 2004
------------- -------------
(Unaudited)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 9,002,184 $ 7,993,200
Accrued liabilities 3,249,823 2,968,813
Current maturities of long-term debt 3,508,172 3,293,187
------------- -------------
Total current liabilities 15,760,179 14,255,200
Long-term debt, less current maturities 46,689,909 47,775,484
------------- -------------
Total liabilities 62,450,088 62,030,684
------------- -------------
Commitments and contingencies -- --
Shareholders' equity (deficit):
Series A Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 50,000,000 shares,
issued and outstanding, 23.57 shares (liquidation preference of $750,000) -- --
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued and
outstanding 14,805,556 shares 148,056 148,056
Additional paid-in capital 9,573,562 9,573,562
Warrants to purchase common stock 400 400
Accumulated deficit (11,602,109) (12,203,133)
------------- -------------
Total shareholders' equity (deficit) (1,880,091) (2,481,115)
------------- -------------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit) $ 60,569,997 $ 59,549,569
============= =============
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed financial statements.
-3-
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
For the Three Months Ended
--------------------------------
January 2, December 28,
2005 2003
------------- -------------
Net revenues $ 40,218,835 $ 30,393,606
Cost of sales 35,796,182 26,687,363
------------- -------------
Gross profit 4,422,653 3,706,243
Selling, general and administrative expenses 1,784,062 2,188,867
------------- -------------
Operating income 2,638,591 1,517,376
Other expenses:
Interest expense (1,511,922) (1,744,590)
Amortization of deferred financing costs (58,073) (360,536)
Debt extinguishment expenses -- (2,778,374)
Other (101,628) 51,114
------------- -------------
Total other expenses (1,671,623) (4,832,386)
------------- -------------
Income (loss) before income taxes 966,968 (3,315,010)
Income tax expense (benefit) 365,944 (1,256,000)
------------- -------------
Net income (loss) $ 601,024 $ (2,059,010)
============= =============
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic $ 0.04 $ (0.14)
============= =============
Diluted $ 0.04 $ (0.14)
============= =============
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic 14,805,556 14,805,556
Diluted 15,202,089 14,805,556
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed financial statements.
-4-
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
For the Three Months Ended
-------------------------------
January 2, December 28,
2005 2003
------------ ------------
Operating Activities:
Net income (loss) $ 601,024 $(2,059,010)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 448,673 1,001,167
Loss on asset disposals 73,241 --
Provision for doubtful accounts 23,108 --
Noncash debt extinguishment expenses -- 2,558,374
Deferred tax benefit 365,944 (1,256,000)
Changes in:
Accounts receivable (1,630,179) (2,908,079)
Inventories (658,933) (239,635)
Prepaid expenses and other 212,333 (171,464)
Accounts payable 1,008,984 (1,246,248)
Accrued liabilities 272,766 205,183
------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 716,961 (4,115,712)
------------ ------------
Investing Activities:
Additions to property and equipment (299,338) (70,842)
------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities (299,338) (70,842)
------------ ------------
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed financial statements.
-5-
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
(UNAUDITED)
For the Three Months Ended
------------------------------
January 2, December 28,
2005 2003
------------ ------------
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from borrowings on long-term debt $ -- $ 5,000,000
Principal payments on long-term debt (870,590) (81,276)
Deferred financing costs -- (395,538)
------------ ------------
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (870,590) 4,523,186
------------ ------------
Net (decrease) increase in cash (452,967) 336,632
Cash at beginning of period 1,609,417 513,622
------------ ------------
Cash at end of period $ 1,156,450 $ 850,254
============ ============
Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ 1,999,701 $ 1,336,500
Income taxes $ -- $ --
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed financial statements.
-6-
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
In connection with bridge financing arrangements with LLCP during the
fiscal year ended September 28, 2003, the Company issued shares of stock and
recorded a debt discount of approximately $1.65 million, which was being
amortized over the remaining life of the debt. Due to the refinancing of the
Company's debt with LLCP on October 31, 2003, the unamortized balance of the
discount as of September 28, 2003 of $482,001 was charged to expense in the
fiscal quarter ended December 28, 2003.
The accompanying notes are an integral part
of these condensed financial statements.
-7-
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JANUARY 2, 2005
(UNAUDITED)
1. NATURE OF BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS
Overhill Farms, Inc. (the "Company" or "Overhill Farms") is a producer of
high-quality entrees, plated meals, meal components, soups, sauces, and poultry,
meat and fish specialties. The Company was a 99% owned subsidiary of TreeCon
Resources, Inc., formerly known as Polyphase Corporation and Overhill
Corporation, until the completion of the spin-off in October 2002. In the
spin-off, TreeCon Resources distributed all of the outstanding shares of the
Company's common stock that it owned to the holders of record of TreeCon
Resources common stock as of the close of business on September 30, 2002.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
current period presentation. The accompanying unaudited condensed financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form
10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of
the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months
ended January 2, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending October 2, 2005 or for any other period.
The condensed balance sheet at September 26, 2004 has been derived from the
audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States for complete financial statements.
For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes
thereto included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 26, 2004.
3. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123 (revised
2004), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS No. 123R")," which is a revision of SFAS No.
123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation." SFAS No. 123R supersedes APB
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and amends SFAS No.
95 "Statement of Cash Flows." Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123R is
similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123R
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee
stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair
values. Pro forma disclosure is not an alternative.
SFAS No. 123R must be adopted by the first interim or annual period
beginning after June 15, 2005. Early adoption will be permitted in periods in
which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company currently
expects to adopt SFAS No. 123R in the fiscal quarter ending October 2, 2005.
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company currently accounts for
share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion No. 25's intrinsic value
method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost for employee
stock options. Accordingly, adoption of SFAS No. 123R's fair value method will
have a significant impact on the Company's result of operations, although it
will have no impact on our overall financial position. The impact of adoption of
SFAS No. 123R cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on the
levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had the Company
adopted SFAS No. 123R in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have
approximated the impact of SFAS No. 123 as described in the disclosure of pro
forma net income and earning per share in Note 7 to the Company's condensed
financial statements. SFAS No. 123 also requires the benefits of tax deductions
in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash
flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current
literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase
net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. The Company cannot estimate
what those amounts will be in the future because they depend on, among other
things, when employees exercise stock options. There were no operating cash
flows in prior periods from share-based payments.
-8-
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 109-1,
"Application of FASB Statement No. 109 (SFAS 109), Accounting for Income Taxes,
to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American
Jobs Creation Act of 2004" ("FSP 109-1"). FSP 109-1 clarifies that the
manufacturer's deduction provided for under the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 (the "Act") should be accounted for as a special deduction in accordance
with SFAS No. 109 and not as a tax rate reduction. The adoption of FSP 109-1
will have no impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position
for fiscal year 2005, as the manufacturer's deduction is not available to the
Company until fiscal year 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect
that the manufacturer's deduction will have in subsequent years.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, "Inventory Costs, an
amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4." SFAS No. 151 clarifies that abnormal
inventory costs such as costs of idle facilities, excess freight and handling
costs and wasted materials (spoilage) are required to be recognized as current
period charges. The provisions of SFAS No. 151 are effective for fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
that this statement will have on its financial statements.
4. INVENTORIES
Inventories are summarized as follows:
January 2, September 26,
2005 2004
----------- -----------
Raw ingredients $ 5,083,624 $ 3,815,724
Finished product 5,123,589 5,764,418
Packaging 1,680,268 1,648,406
----------- -----------
$11,887,481 $11,228,548
=========== ===========
A reserve is established for the estimated aged surplus, spoiled or damaged
products, and discontinued inventory items and components. Historically, the
amount of the reserve was determined by analyzing inventory composition,
expected usage, historical and projected sales information, and other factors.
During the quarter ended January 2, 2005, the Company revised its method to
apply reserve estimation percentages to aging categories. The effect of this
change in estimate resulted in one-time higher cost of sales and lower gross
profit of approximately $650,000 and lowered net income by approximately
$370,000 for the three months ended January 2, 2005.
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
On October 31, 2003, the Company entered into debt refinancing arrangements
with Levine Leichtman Capital Partners II, L.P. ("LLCP") and Pleasant Street
Investors, LLC ("PSI"). The Company issued to LLCP a second amended and restated
secured senior subordinated note due October 31, 2006 in the stated principal
amount of $28,858,000. The note has a base interest rate of 13.5%, subject to
increase upon the occurrence of any interest rate event, as defined in the
purchase documents, or event of default, and a maturity date of October 31,
2006.
PSI has made two term loans to the Company. The senior Term A Loan, in the
principal amount of $17,800,000, has an annual interest rate on the in-formula
portion of 5.5%. The $5,000,000 Term B Loan amortizes monthly and carries a base
interest rate of 12%. The interest rates on the Term A Loan and Term B Loan are
subject to increase upon the occurrence of any interest rate event, as defined
in the loan documents, or event of default as provided in the notes that
evidence those loans. The Term A Loan and the Term B Loan were to mature on
October 31, 2006. The maturity of the Term B Loan was subsequently amended, as
discussed below. The prepayment terms of the Term A Loan and the Term B Loan
provide, among other things, that the Company will make mandatory prepayments of
annual excess cash flow, if any.
-9-
The amended and restated securities purchase agreement with LLCP and the
amended and restated loan and security agreement with PSI contain various
covenants, including financial covenants covering restrictions on capital
expenditures, minimum EBITDA and net worth levels, and specified debt service
and debt to equity ratios. In addition, those agreements prohibit changes in
control, including ownership and certain management personnel, and contain
customary restrictions on incurring indebtedness and liens, making investments,
paying dividends and making loans or advances. The obligations owing by the
Company to PSI and LLCP are secured by liens on substantially all of the
Company's assets.
The October 31, 2003 debt refinancing has been recorded as a debt
extinguishment. Accordingly, unamortized costs associated with the LLCP and PSI
debt that existed at October 31, 2003, along with new amendment fees paid to
LLCP and PSI, were expensed on October 31, 2003. The unamortized costs included
original issue debt discounts of $1,048,677, unamortized financing fees and
expenses of $1,456,834 and unamortized cost of warrants issued to LLCP in
September 2002 of $618,633. The total expense recognized in connection with the
October 31, 2003 debt extinguishment, including the amendment fees of $184,800
and $35,200, amounted to $2,778,374.
The Company did not meet the level "A" fixed charges requirement of the
securities purchase agreement with LLCP and the loan and securities agreement
with PSI at June 27, 2004, which triggered an interest rate event, causing
interest rates to increase on all debt by 2%. However, the Company did meet the
level "B" fixed charges requirement and therefore, no event of default, as
defined in the loan documents, occurred. The Company did meet all of the other
level "A" requirements, including the EBITDA requirement. The level "A" fixed
charges requirement was not met because of management's decision to make capital
expenditures in the third quarter of fiscal year 2004. The capital expenditures
were made to secure cost savings and to meet the production requirements of a
significant customer. As a result of the interest rate event, interest rates
rose, effective June 28, 2004. Except as described below, the fixed charges
requirement is measured quarterly, and increases in interest rates due to an
interest rate event remain in effect until the end of the first full quarter in
which the Company meets the fixed charges requirement.
On October 6, 2004, the Company executed the fourth amendment to the
existing financing arrangements with PSI and LLCP to amend the financial
covenants and various other provisions. Effective September 26, 2004, the new
amendments to the securities purchase agreement with LLCP and the loan and
securities agreement with PSI eliminated, for the fiscal quarters ending January
2, 2005 and April 3, 2005, the potential for a 2% increase in interest rates
like the increase that occurred on June 27, 2004, and reduced the base rate on
the Term B Loan from 12% to LIBOR plus 7.5%. In exchange, the Company agreed to
increase its payment of principal on the Term B Loan from $69,445 per month to
specified monthly amounts ranging from $254,445 to $274,445. Prior to this
amendment, the Term B Loan was to have a balance of $2.5 million due at maturity
of the loan on October 31, 2006. Under this amendment, the Term B Loan will be
entirely paid off by January 31, 2006. The increase in cash required for
principal repayment is offset, in part, by savings from the reduction in
interest rates.
The Company believes, based upon forecasted performance for fiscal year
2005, that it is probable that the Company will be in compliance with all of its
revised financial and other covenant requirements. Accordingly, based upon
projected covenant compliance and as a result of the refinancing of the
obligations described above, all principal amounts payable to LLCP and to PSI,
other than currently scheduled principal payments, have been classified as
long-term liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet as of January 2, 2005.
In the future, the failure of the Company to achieve certain revenue, expense
and profitability levels could result in a violation of the amended financial
covenants under its financing arrangements and could result in acceleration of
maturity of the loans, which could adversely affect the Company's financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
6. PER SHARE DATA
The Company computes earnings per share ("EPS") pursuant to SFAS No. 128
"Earnings Per Share." Basic EPS is computed based on the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed based on
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and
potentially dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding for the period.
-10-
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic earnings per
share and diluted earnings per share is as follows:
Three Months Ended
-------------------------------
January 2, December 28,
2005 2003
------------- -------------
Basic EPS Computation:
Numerator $ 601,024 $ (2,059,010)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding 14,805,556 14,805,556
------------- -------------
Total shares 14,805,556 14,805,556
============= =============
Basic EPS $ 0.04 $ (0.14)
============= =============
Diluted EPS Computation:
Numerator $ 601,024 $ (2,059,010)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding 14,805,556 14,805,556
Incremental shares from assumed conversion
of preferred stock and exercise of stock
option and warrants 396,533 --
------------- -------------
Total shares 15,202,089 14,805,556
============= =============
Diluted EPS $ 0.04 $ (0.14)
============= =============
For the three months ended January 2, 2005, 472,000 shares attributable to
outstanding out-of-the-money stock options were excluded from the computation of
diluted EPS because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the three
months ended December 28, 2003, 672,000 shares attributable to outstanding stock
options, warrants exercisable for 200 shares and 283,076 shares of convertible
preferred stock were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because their
inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
7. STOCK OPTIONS
The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees and directors
using the intrinsic value method as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board's
Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" and provides the pro
forma disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." As such, compensation expense for stock options issued to
employees is recorded on the date of the grant only if the current market price
of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options, based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, is amortized to
expense over the options' vesting periods. Had the fair value method under SFAS
No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148 been adopted, there would have been no pro
forma expense in the three months ended January 2, 2005 and December 28, 2003,
as there were no unvested options outstanding during the periods.
8. INCOME TAXES
During the three months ended January 2, 2005, the Company recorded income
tax expense of $366,000 and a decrease in its deferred tax asset of $366,000.
The Company recorded a $425,000 valuation allowance against a portion of its
deferred tax assets, since it believed that such assets did not meet the more
likely than not criteria to be recoverable through projected future profitable
operations in the foreseeable future. The Company currently expects to improve
on its current operating results, and continue profitable operations, primarily
through (a) improving gross margins by streamlining additional costs and
continuing to leverage the manufacturing and storage facilities to improve
manufacturing efficiency, (b) growing revenues from profitable product lines and
increasing its customer base, (c) adding higher margin products and (d)
maintaining reduced future interest costs on outstanding debt as a result of the
recently completed amendments to its financing arrangements. Failure by the
Company to successfully improve margins, grow revenues and/or maintain
anticipated savings on future interest costs, and return to profitable operating
results in the near term, could adversely affect the Company's expected
realization of some or all of its deferred tax assets and could require the
Company to record a valuation allowance against some or all of such assets,
which could adversely affect the Company's financial position and results of
operations.
-11-
The effective tax rates for the first three months of fiscal years 2005 and
2004 were based upon the estimated annual effective tax rates of approximately
40.8% in 2005 and (37.9%) in 2004, respectively. The effective tax rate for the
first three months of fiscal year 2005 approximated the statutory rate. The
effective tax rate for the first three months of fiscal year 2004 was lower than
the statutory rate based upon California's limitation on net operating (benefit)
loss carryovers, which permits only 50% of the net operating loss to be used in
future periods.
9. CONTINGENCIES
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, the Company is involved in various lawsuits, claims and
proceedings related to the conduct of the Company's business. Management does
not believe that the disposition of any pending claims is likely to adversely
affect the Company's financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
The Company's financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of
credit risk consist primarily of trade receivables. The Company performs ongoing
credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and generally requires
no collateral from its customers. The Company charges off uncollectible accounts
at the point in time when no recovery is expected.
A significant portion of the Company's total net revenues was derived from
three customers. Panda Restaurant Group, Jenny Craig Products and American
Airlines accounted for approximately 30.3%, 14.1% and 9.4%, respectively, of the
Company's revenues for the three months ended January 2, 2005. Distributors for
Panda Restaurant Group, Jenny Craig Products and American Airlines accounted for
approximately 35.4%, 21.6% and 13.0%, respectively, of the Company's total
accounts receivable balance at January 2, 2005. Panda Restaurant Group, Jenny
Craig Products and American Airlines accounted for approximately 28.7%, 17.9%
and 9.3%, respectively, of the Company's revenues for the three months ended
December 28, 2003. Distributors for Panda Restaurant Group, Jenny Craig Products
and American Airlines accounted for approximately 18.0%, 24.1% and 16.2%,
respectively, of the Company's total accounts receivable balance at September
26, 2004. The Company intends to reduce its reliance on a small concentration of
accounts by further expansion into custom products for retail and foodservice
customers nationwide.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with
our condensed financial statements and notes to condensed financial statements
included elsewhere in this document. This report, and our condensed financial
statements and notes to our condensed financial statements, contain
forward-looking statements, which generally include the plans and objectives of
management for future operations, including plans and objectives relating to our
future economic performance and our current beliefs regarding revenues we might
earn if we are successful in implementing our business strategies.
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements are based on current expectations or beliefs, including, but not
limited to, statements concerning our operations and financial performance and
condition. For this purpose, statements of historical fact may be deemed to be
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements which
are predictive in nature, which depend upon or refer to future events or
conditions, which include words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends,"
"plans," "believes," "estimates," "projects," "forecasts," "goal," or similar
expressions. In addition, any statements concerning future financial performance
(including future revenues, earnings or growth rates), ongoing business
strategies or prospects, and possible future company actions, that may be
provided by management, are also forward-looking statements. We caution that
these statements by their nature involve risks and uncertainties, and actual
results may differ materially depending on a variety of important factors,
including, among others:
-12-
o the impact of competitive products and pricing;
o market conditions that may affect the cost of raw materials as well as
the markets for our products;
o changes in our business environment, including actions of competitors
and changes in customer preferences, as well as disruptions to our
customers' businesses, such as the Southern California grocery strike
that occurred during the period from October 2003 to February 2004;
o the occurrence of acts of terrorism, such as the events of September
11, 2001, or acts of war;
o changes in governmental laws and regulations, including income taxes;
and
o other factors as may be discussed in this report and other reports we
file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those
described in Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 26, 2004 under the heading "Risk Factors Related
to Our Business and Industry."
OVERVIEW
Our goal is to be a leading developer and manufacturer of value-added food
products and provider of custom prepared foods. We intend to create superior
value for our stockholders by continuing to execute our growth and operating
strategies. We employ the following corporate strategies:
o diversify our customer base, focusing on sectors with attractive
growth characteristics, such as foodservice and retail;
o invest in and operate efficient production facilities;
o provide customer service-oriented distribution;
o offer a broad range of products to customers in multiple channels of
distribution; and
o continue to pursue growth through strategic acquisitions and
investments.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management's discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations is based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the
audited financial statements that are included in our 2004 annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 26, 2004. We believe the following critical
accounting policies are related to our more significant estimates and
assumptions used in the preparation of our financial statements.
CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK. Our financial instruments that are exposed
to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of trade receivables. We
perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers' financial condition and
generally require no collateral from our customers. A bankruptcy or other
significant financial deterioration of any customers could impact their future
ability to satisfy their receivables with us. Our allowance for doubtful
accounts is calculated based primarily upon historical bad debt experience and
current market conditions. Until fiscal 2003, bad debt expense and accounts
receivable write-offs, net of recoveries, historically were immaterial as we
generally transact the substantial portion of our business with large,
established food or service related businesses. There were no write-offs, net of
recoveries, to the allowance for doubtful accounts for the three months ended
January 2, 2005 and December 28, 2003, respectively.
-13-
A significant portion of our total net revenues was derived from three
customers. Panda Restaurant Group, Jenny Craig Products and American Airlines
accounted for approximately 30.3%, 14.1% and 9.4%, respectively, of our revenues
for the three months ended January 2, 2005. Distributors for Panda Restaurant
Group, Jenny Craig Products and American Airlines accounted for approximately
35.4%, 21.6% and 13.0%, respectively, of our total accounts receivable balance
at January 2, 2005. Panda Restaurant Group, Jenny Craig Products and American
Airlines accounted for approximately 28.7%, 17.9% and 9.3%, respectively, of our
revenues for the three months ended December 28, 2003. Distributors for Panda
Restaurant Group, Jenny Craig Products and American Airlines accounted for
approximately 18.0%, 24.1% and 16.2%, respectively, of our total accounts
receivable balance at September 26, 2004.
INVENTORIES. Inventories, which include material, labor and manufacturing
overhead, are stated at the lower of cost, which approximates the first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method, or market. We use a standard costing system to estimate
our FIFO cost of inventory at the end of each reporting period. Historically,
standard costs have been materially consistent with actual costs. We determine
the market value of our raw ingredients, finished product and packaging
inventories based upon references to current market prices for such items as of
the end of each reporting period and record a write-down of inventory standard
cost to market, when applicable. We periodically review our inventory for excess
items, and we establish a valuation reserve based upon the age of specific items
in inventory and the expected recovery from the disposition of the items.
A reserve is established for the estimated aged surplus, spoiled or damaged
products, and discontinued inventory items and components. Historically, the
amount of the reserve was determined by analyzing inventory composition,
expected usage, historical and projected sales information, and other factors.
During the quarter ended January 2, 2005, we revised our method to apply reserve
estimation percentages to aging categories. The effect of this change in
estimate resulted in one-time higher cost of sales and lower gross profit of
approximately $650,000 and lowered net income by approximately $370,000 for the
three months ended January 2, 2005.
EXCESS OF COST OVER FAIR VALUE OF NET ASSETS ACQUIRED. We evaluate the
excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) at least
annually for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142. We have one reporting
unit and estimate fair value based on a variety of market factors, including
discounted cash flow analysis, market capitalization, and other market-based
data. No impairment of goodwill was recorded during fiscal year 2004. At January
2, 2005, we had goodwill of $12,188,000. A deterioration of our operating
results and the related cash flow effect could decrease the estimated fair value
of our business and, thus, cause our goodwill to become impaired and cause us to
record a charge against operations in an amount representing the impairment.
INCOME TAXES. During the three months ended January 2, 2005, we recorded
income tax expense of $366,000 and a decrease in our deferred tax asset of
$366,000. We recorded a $425,000 valuation allowance against a portion of our
deferred tax assets, since we believe that such assets did not meet the more
likely than not criteria to be recoverable through projected future profitable
operations in the foreseeable future. Should our estimates of future taxable
income decline, we may not realize some or all of our remaining deferred tax
assets, and we could be required to record a larger valuation allowance against
some or all of those assets, which would result in a charge to operations. The
effective tax rates for the first three months of fiscal years 2005 and 2004
were based upon the estimated annual effective tax rates of approximately 40.8%
in 2005 and (37.9%) in 2004, respectively. The effective tax rate for the first
three months of fiscal year 2005 approximated the statutory rate. The effective
tax rate for the first three months of fiscal year 2004 was lower than the
statutory rate based upon California's limitation on net operating (benefit)
loss carryovers, which permits only 50% of the net operating loss to be used in
future periods.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 2, 2005 COMPARED TO QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2003
While we operate as a single business unit, manufacturing various products
on common production lines, revenues from similar customers are grouped into the
following natural categories: retail (including weight loss), foodservice and
airlines.
The quarters ended January 2, 2005 and December 28, 2003 were 14-week and
13-week periods, respectively.
NET REVENUES. Net revenues for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005
increased $9,825,000 (32.3%) to $40,219,000 from $30,394,000 for the first
quarter of fiscal year 2004. The increase in net revenues resulted from growth
in all business categories through the continued development of existing
accounts and from the addition of new customers. Retail (including weight loss)
net revenues increased $5,356,000 (47.5%) to $16,628,000 for the first quarter
of fiscal year 2005 as compared to $11,272,000 for the first quarter of fiscal
-14-
year 2004, attributable to sales to new retail customers added during the second
half of fiscal year 2004. Airline net revenues increased $2,252,000 (36.1%) to
$8,491,000 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 as compared to $6,239,000
for the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. This was the result of growth from
existing customers due to increased air travel and the addition of new airline
accounts. Foodservice net revenues increased $2,216,000 (17.2%) to $15,099,000
for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 as compared to $12,883,000 for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2004 due to increased production requirements of an
existing customer.
GROSS PROFIT. Gross profit increased $717,000 (19.3%) to $4,423,000 for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2005 as compared to $3,706,000 for the first
quarter of fiscal year 2004. This was the result of better leveraging of fixed
costs associated with increased production volume during the quarter. The
improved gross profit from the volume increase was offset by a change in
estimated inventory reserve amounts, resulting in gross profit as a percentage
of net revenues of 11.0% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 as compared
to 12.2% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. In addition, the Company
decided to accept some lower-margin contracts from customers the Company
believes have the potential to generate significant sales volume in the future.
The Company believes that with the start-up of production on the new accounts
completed, overall gross margins should improve in future periods.
A reserve method that applies estimated reserve percentages to aging
categories was adopted during the first quarter of fiscal year 2005. The impact
of this change in estimate resulted in a one-time increase to cost of sales and
decrease in gross profit of approximately $650,000 or 1.6% decline in gross
profit as a percentage of net revenues.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Selling, general and
administrative expenses (SG&A) decreased $405,000 (18.5%) to $1,784,000 (4.4% of
net revenues) for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 as compared to
$2,189,000 (7.2% of net revenues) for the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. The
decrease in SG&A resulted primarily from reduction in legal fees and the reduced
requirement for point-of-sale demonstration and promotional activity.
OPERATING INCOME. Operating income increased $1,122,000 (74.0%) to
$2,639,000 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 as compared to $1,517,000
for the first quarter of fiscal year 2004 due to revenue growth and improvements
in production costs and SG&A expenses discussed above.
OTHER EXPENSES. Other expenses decreased $3,160,000 (65.4%) for the first
quarter of fiscal year 2005 to $1,672,000 as compared to $4,832,000 for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2004. The decrease was attributable to savings
realized from the debt refinancing discussed below. In particular, interest
expense and amortization costs declined 13.3% and 83.9%, respectively, for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2005 from the first quarter of fiscal year 2004.
However, included in other expenses for the first quarter of fiscal year 2004
was a substantially noncash charge of $2,778,000 for debt extinguishment
expenses related to the write-off of deferred financing costs and debt issue
costs in connection with the October 2003 refinancing discussed below.
NET INCOME (LOSS). The net result for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005
was net income of $601,000 ($.04 per basic and diluted share) as compared to a
net loss of $2,059,000 ($.14 per basic and diluted share) for the first quarter
of fiscal year 2004.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our principal source of liquidity is cash generated from our operating
activities. Our cash and cash equivalents decreased $453,000 to $1,156,000 at
January 2, 2005 from $1,609,000 at September 26, 2004.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, our operating activities
provided cash of $717,000 as compared to a use of cash of $4,116,000 during the
first quarter of fiscal year 2004. Cash generated from operations before working
capital changes was $1,512,000. Cash generated from changes in working capital
resulted from a $1,009,000 increase in accounts payable, a $273,000 increase in
accrued liabilities and a decrease in prepaid expenses of $212,000, reduced by
decreases in cash that resulted from a $1,630,000 increase in accounts
receivable and a $659,000 increase in inventories. As of January 2, 2005, we had
working capital of $13,770,000.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, our investing activities
resulted in a use of cash of $299,000 as compared to a use of cash of $71,000
during the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. Current year additions to property
and equipment relate to the purchase of new machinery to automate certain
manufacturing processes.
-15-
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005, our financing activities
resulted in a use of cash of $871,000 as compared to cash provided of $4,523,000
during the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. The use of cash during the current
fiscal year resulted from principal payments on our long-term debt. The cash
provided in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004 resulted primarily from new
borrowings, net of related deferred financing costs, in connection with the debt
refinancing in October 2003 (as discussed below), offset by principal payments
during the fiscal year on our long-term debt.
On October 31, 2003, we entered into debt refinancing arrangements with
LLCP and PSI. We issued to LLCP a second amended and restated secured senior
subordinated note due October 31, 2006 in the stated principal amount of
$28,858,000. The note has a base interest rate of 13.5%, subject to increase
upon the occurrence of any interest rate event, as defined in the purchase
documents, or event of default, and a maturity date of October 31, 2006.
PSI has made two term loans to us. The senior Term A Loan, in the principal
amount of $17,800,000, has an annual interest rate on the in-formula portion of
5.5%. The $5,000,000 Term B Loan amortizes monthly and carries a base interest
rate of 12%. The interest rates on the Term A Loan and Term B Loan are subject
to increase upon the occurrence of any interest rate event, as defined in the
loan documents, or event of default as provided in the notes that evidence those
loans. The Term A Loan and the Term B Loan were to mature on October 31, 2006.
The maturity of the Term B Loan was subsequently amended, as discussed below.
The prepayment terms of the Term A Loan and the Term B Loan provide, among other
things, that we will make mandatory prepayments of annual excess cash flow, if
any.
The amended and restated securities purchase agreement with LLCP and the
amended and restated loan and security agreement with PSI contain various
covenants, including financial covenants covering restrictions on capital
expenditures, minimum EBITDA and net worth levels, and specified debt service
and debt to equity ratios. In addition, those agreements prohibit changes in
control, including ownership and certain management personnel, and contain
customary restrictions on incurring indebtedness and liens, making investments,
paying dividends and making loans or advances. The obligations owing by us to
PSI and LLCP are secured by liens on substantially all of our assets.
The October 31, 2003 debt refinancing has been recorded as a debt
extinguishment. Accordingly, unamortized costs associated with the LLCP and PSI
debt that existed at October 31, 2003, along with new amendment fees paid to
LLCP and PSI, were expensed on October 31, 2003. The unamortized costs included
original issue debt discounts of $1,048,677, unamortized financing fees and
expenses of $1,456,834 and unamortized cost of warrants issued to LLCP in
September 2002 of $618,633. The total expense recognized in connection with the
October 31, 2003 debt extinguishment, including the amendment fees of $184,800
and $35,200, amounted to $2,778,374.
We did not meet the level "A" fixed charges requirement of the securities
purchase agreement with LLCP and the loan and securities agreement with PSI at
June 27, 2004, which triggered an interest rate event, causing interest rates to
increase on all debt by 2%. However, we did meet the level "B" fixed charges
requirement and therefore, no event of default, as defined in the loan
documents, occurred. We did meet all of the other level "A" requirements,
including the EBITDA requirement. The level "A" fixed charges requirement was
not met because of our decision to make capital expenditures in the third
quarter of fiscal year 2004. The capital expenditures were made to secure cost
savings and to meet the production requirements of a significant customer. As a
result of the interest rate event, interest rates rose, effective June 28, 2004.
Except as described below, the fixed charges requirement is measured quarterly,
and increases in interest rates due to an interest rate event remain in effect
until the end of the first full quarter in which we meet the fixed charges
requirement.
On October 6, 2004, we executed the fourth amendment to the existing
financing arrangements with PSI and LLCP to amend the financial covenants and
various other provisions. Effective September 26, 2004, the new amendments to
the securities purchase agreement with LLCP and the loan and securities
agreement with PSI eliminated, for the first and second quarters of fiscal year
2005, the potential for a 2% increase in interest rates like the increase that
occurred on June 7, 2004, and reduced the base rate on the Term B Loan from 12%
to LIBOR plus 7.5%. In exchange, we agreed to increase our payment of principal
on the Term B Loan from $69,445 per month to specified monthly amounts ranging
from $254,445 to $274,445. Prior to this amendment, the Term B Loan was to have
a balance of $2.5 million due at maturity of the loan on October 31, 2006. Under
this amendment, the Term B Loan will be entirely paid off by January 31, 2006.
The increase in cash required for principal repayment is offset, in part, by
savings from the reduction in interest rates.
-16-
We believe, based upon forecasted performance for fiscal year 2005, that it
is probable that we will be in compliance with all of the revised financial and
other covenant requirements. Accordingly, based upon projected covenant
compliance and as a result of the refinancing of the obligations described
above, all principal amounts payable to LLCP and to PSI, other than currently
scheduled principal payments, have been classified as long-term liabilities in
the accompanying balance sheet as of January 2, 2005. In the future, our failure
to achieve certain revenue, expense and profitability levels could result in a
violation of the amended financial covenants under our financing arrangements
and could result in acceleration of maturity of the loans, which could adversely
affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
We believe that funds available to us from operations and existing capital
resources will be adequate for our capital requirements for at least the next
twelve months.
Following is a summary of our contractual obligations at January 2, 2005.
PAYMENTS DUE BY PERIOD
----------------------
CONTRACTUAL REMAINDER OF MORE THAN
OBLIGATIONS TOTAL FISCAL YEAR 2-3 YEARS 4-5 YEARS 5 YEARS
----------- ----- ----------- --------- --------- -------
Debt maturities $ 50,198,081 $ 2,689,527 $ 47,508,554 $ -- $ --
Contractual obligations 14,452,882 1,719,772 3,832,926 2,851,939 6,048,245
Open purchase orders 38,120,185 30,009,435 8,110,750 -- --
------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total contractual
obligations $102,771,148 $ 34,418,734 $ 59,452,230 $ 2,851,939 $ 6,048,245
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk - Obligations. We are subject to interest rate risk on
variable interest rate obligations. A hypothetical 10% increase in average
market interest rates would increase by approximately $163,000 annual interest
expense on our debt outstanding as of January 2, 2005. We are also subject to
interest rate risk on our fixed interest rate obligations. Based upon
outstanding amounts of fixed rate obligations as of January 2, 2005, a
hypothetical 10% decrease in average market interest rates would increase the
fair value of outstanding fixed rate debt by approximately $265,000.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
respectively), has concluded based on its evaluation as of January 2, 2005 that
the design and operation of our "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined
in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
("Exchange Act")) are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is
accumulated, recorded, processed, summarized and reported to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding whether or not disclosure is
required.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2005 there were no changes in our
"internal controls over financial reporting" (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under
the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
-17-
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we are involved in various lawsuits, claims and
proceedings related to the conduct of our business. Management does not believe
that the disposition of any pending claims is likely to adversely affect our
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On October 28, 2004, we held our 2004 annual meeting of stockholders. The
total number of outstanding votable shares included 14,805,556 shares of common
stock that were entitled to cast one vote per share on each proposal and 23.57
shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that were entitled to cast 12,010
votes per share on each proposal. Nine nominees were presented for election and
elected to our board of directors at the meeting. The results of the vote were
as follows:
Nominee For Withheld Total Voted
------- --- -------- -----------
James Rudis 8,613,682 121,425 8,735,107
John L. Steinbrun 8,582,319 152,788 8,735,107
William E. Shatley 8,581,394 153,713 8,735,107
Harold Estes 8,410,169 324,938 8,735,107
Geoffrey A. Gerard 8,582,219 152,888 8,735,107
John E. McConnaughy, Jr. 8,595,982 139,125 8,735,107
Alexander Auerbach 8,612,507 122,600 8,735,107
Louis J. Giraudo 8,613,007 122,100 8,735,107
Alexander Rodetis, Jr. 8,613,007 122,100 8,735,107
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
Number Description
------ -----------
10.1 Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Loan and
Security Agreement, dated October 6, 2004, to be effective
as of September 26, 2004, by and among Overhill Farms, Inc.
and Pleasant Street Investors, LLC (1)
10.2 Fourth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated October 6, 2004, to be effective
as of September 26, 2004, by and among Overhill Farms, Inc.
and Levine Leichtman Capital Partners II, L.P. (1)
10.3 Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Secured Senior
Subordinated Note due 2006, dated October 6, 2004, to be
effective as of September 26, 2004, by and between Overhill
Farms, Inc. and Levine Leichtman Capital Partners II, L.P.
(1)
10.4 Consent Under Second Amended and Restated Intercreditor and
Subordination Agreement, dated October 6, 2004, to be
effective as of September 26, 2004, by and between Pleasant
Street Investors, LLC and Levine Leichtman Capital Partners
II, L.P. (1)
31 Certifications Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(2)
---------------
(1) Filed with the initial filing of our Form 8-K for October 6,
2004 and incorporated herein by reference.
(2) Filed herewith
-18-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OVERHILL FARMS, INC.
(REGISTRANT)
Date: February 9, 2005 By: /s/ James Rudis
--------------------------------
James Rudis
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 9, 2005 By: /s/ John L. Steinbrun
--------------------------------
John L. Steinbrun
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
-19-
EXHIBITS FILED WITH THIS FORM 10-Q
Number Description
------ -----------
31 Certifications Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
-20-