2

The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these balance sheets.

3

The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

4

(Continued)

5

The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

6

The unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations of Steiner Leisure Limited ("Steiner Leisure" or the "Company") for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003 reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly present the results of operations for these interim periods. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and the Company's other filings with the SEC.

Steiner Leisure Limited (including its subsidiaries where the context requires, the "Company") is a worldwide provider of spa services. The Company, incorporated in the Bahamas, commenced operations effective November 1995 with the contributions of substantially all of the assets and certain of the liabilities of the Maritime Division (the "Maritime Division") of Steiner Group Limited, now known as STGR Limited ("Steiner Group"), a U.K. company and an affiliate of the Company, and all of the outstanding common stock of Coiffeur Transocean (Overseas), Inc. ("CTO"), a Florida corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Steiner Group. These operations consisted almost entirely of offering spa services and products on cruise ships. The contributions of the net assets of the Maritime Division and CTO were recorded at historical cost in a manner similar to a pooling of interests.

On July 3, 2001, the Company purchased a 60% equity interest of each of Mandara Spa LLC ("Mandara US") and Mandara Spa Asia Limited ("Mandara Asia" and collectively with Mandara US, "Mandara Spa"). During 2002, the Company acquired the balance of the equity interests in Mandara Spa. Mandara Spa operates spas principally in the United States, the Caribbean, the Pacific and Asia. Mandara Spa also provides spa services for Norwegian Cruise Line, Orient Lines and Silverseas Cruises.

Inventories, consisting principally of beauty products, are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Manufactured finished goods include the cost of raw material, labor and overhead. Inventories consist of the following:

7

Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a fair value-based test. The impairment loss is the amount, if any, by which the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying or book value. Impairment loss for goodwill arising from the initial application of SFAS 142 is to be reported as resulting from a change in accounting principle. The Company adopted SFAS 142 on January 1, 2002. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company completed its assessment of its intangible assets and wrote off $29.6 million of intangible assets. These intangibles primarily consisted of goodwill related to our July 2001 acquisitions of the Greenhouse Day Spa and C.Spa chains. The write-off has been accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and has been recorded effective January 1, 2002.

The Company files a consolidated tax return for its domestic subsidiaries. In addition, the Company's foreign subsidiaries file income tax returns in their respective countries of incorporation, where required. The Company follows SFAS 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes." SFAS 109 utilizes the liability method and deferred taxes are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities given the provisions of enacted tax laws. SFAS 109 permits the recognition of deferred tax assets. Deferred income tax provisions and benefits are based on the changes to the asset or liability from period to period. For any partnership interest (including limited liability companies), the Company records its allocable share of income, gains, losses, deductions and credits of the partnership.

Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. The related translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from transactions, including intercompany transactions, are included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The majority of the Company's income is generated outside of the United States. The transaction gains (losses) reflected in administrative expenses were approximately $(30,000) and $7,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively, and approximately $76,000 and $(20,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively.

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income available to shareholders by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares. The calculation of diluted earnings per share is similar to that of basic earnings per share, except that the denominator includes dilutive common share equivalents such as share options. The computation of weighted average common and common equivalent shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is as follows:

As of June 30, 2003, 11,000 share options have been exercised.

8

The Company follows the provisions of SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," in accounting for stock-based transactions with non-employees and, accordingly, records compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations for such transactions. The Company continues to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related interpretations for stock-based transactions with employees, as permitted by SFAS 123.

The Company applies APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting for options granted to employees. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized related to such grants. Had compensation cost for the Company's shares been based on fair value at the grant dates for awards under the Company's option plan consistent with the methodologies of SFAS 123, the Company's three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003 net income (loss) and diluted earnings per share would have been reduced/increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions: expected volatility of 59.8%, and 59.1% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively, risk-free interest rate of 6.0%, no dividends and expected term of 6.5 years.

In June 2001, Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations." SFAS 143 applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. SFAS 143 is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company adopted this statement in the first quarter of 2003. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations.

In June 2002, FASB issued SFAS 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities," which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring." The principal difference between SFAS 146 and EITF 94-3 relates to SFAS 146's requirements for recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity. SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. A fundamental conclusion reached by FASB in this statement is that an entity's commitment to a plan, by itself, does not create an obligation that meet s the definition of a liability. Therefore, this statement eliminates the definition and requirements for recognition of exit costs in EITF 94-3. This statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The effective date of the new statement is January 1, 2003, with earlier adoption encouraged. In connection with its discontinued day spa operations, the Company early adopted SFAS 146 in 2002.

9

In January 2003, the FASB Issued Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." FIN 46 requires an investor with a majority of the variable interests in a variable interest entity to consolidate the entity and also requires majority and significant variable interest investors to provide certain disclosures. A variable interest entity is an entity in which the equity investors do not have a controlling interest or the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity's activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from the other parties. It applies to the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The disclosure requirements are effective for all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. Management is currently assessing the impact of FIN 46 on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2003, FASB issued SFAS 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. In accordance with SFAS 150, financial instruments that embody obligations for the issuer are required to be classified as liabilities. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. There was no impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements upon the adoption of the provisions of SFAS 150.

In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company approved and committed to a plan to sell or dispose of its day spa segment, with the exception of two of its day spas. The day spa segment primarily consisted of the financial position and results of operations of the Greenhouse and C.Spa day spa chains. In accordance with SFAS 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the operating results of the day spa segment, excluding the day spas that are being kept, are reported in discontinued operations and the remaining assets and liabilities are classified as assets held for sale and liabilities related to assets held for sale, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003. During the first quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company disposed of ten day spas and, effective April 15, 2003, the remaining four day spas were sold.

Additional information regarding the Company's discontinued day spa operations is as follows:

10

In connection with the transactions to sell the day spas to third parties, the Company remains liable under certain leases for those day spas in the event third party lease assignees fail to pay rent under such leases. The total amount that the Company remains liable for under such assigned leases, if the assignees fail to make the payments that they are required to make, is approximately $6.0 million.

In connection with the discontinued day spa operations, the President of the day spas segment has terminated her employment with the Company and received options to purchase 100,000 common shares of the Company and a severance payment of $748,000 during the second quarter of 2003.

In January 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with the sellers to sell back the assets of one of the spas the Company acquired.  The agreement required the Company to make payments to the sellers of approximately $1.0 million in cash and 8,143 common shares valued at $100,000.

Effective September 28, 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement to reduce its exposure to market risks from changing interest rates. Under the swap agreement, the Company agrees to exchange the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to a notional principal amount. Any differences paid or received on interest rate swap agreements are recognized as adjustments to interest expense over the life of each swap, thereby adjusting the effective interest rate on the underlying obligation. The Company does not hold or issue such financial instruments for trading purposes. Derivatives used for hedging purposes must be designated as, and effective as, a hedge of the identified risk exposure at the inception of the contract. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the derivative contract must be highly correlated with changes in the fair value of the underlying hedged item at inception of the hedge and over the life of the hedge cont ract.

The interest rate swap has a notional amount of $9.0 million as of June 30, 2003 and matures on September 30, 2003. The interest rate swap agreement effectively converts a portion of the Company's LIBOR-based variable rate borrowings into fixed rate borrowings with a pay rate of 7.68%. The Company recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income unrealized gains (losses) of $(121,000) and $81,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively and $25,000 and $162,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively in connection with this swap. There was no gain or loss on the swap as a result of ineffectiveness. Prepayment of the loan, changes in counterparty credit worthiness and changing market conditions could result in the reclassification into earnings of gains and losses that are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company reclassified losses of $(101,000) and $(80,000) related to the interest rate swap into intere st expense in the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively, and $(209,000) and $(216,000) in the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Approximately $71,000 in losses are expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months as interest payments occur.

Accrued expenses consists of the following:

The credit agreement contains customary affirmative, negative and financial covenants, including limitations on dividends, capital expenditures and funded debt, and requirements to maintain prescribed interest expense and fixed charge coverage ratios. As of June 30, 2003, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants.

The subordinated notes are the Mandara - US Notes and the Mandara - Asia Notes. The Mandara - US Notes interest accrues quarterly but is payable on the maturity date. The Mandara - Asia Notes interest accrues and is payable quarterly. The interest rates on all the Notes is 9% per annum and they all mature on January 2, 2005.

The note payable is due to the company that formerly owned a 40% minority interest in Mandara Spa. The note bears interest at approximately nine percent per annum due quarterly and matures on various dates through March 31, 2006.

All of the long-term debt is denominated in US dollars.

12

Included in identifiable assets of the Spa Operations segment at December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003 are assets held for sale of $322,000 and $745,000, respectively.

13

In July 2001, we completed the acquisitions of the Mandara Spa resort spas and cruise ship concessions and the Greenhouse and C.Spa day spa chains. These transactions were accounted for under the purchase method, and accordingly, our financial results included the results of the acquired entities subsequent to their acquisitions. In the fourth quarter of 2002, we determined to sell or otherwise dispose of most of our day spa operations. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," the operating results of the former day spa segment, excluding the day spas that were not being disposed of, are reported in discontinued operations and the remaining assets and liabilities are classified as assets held for sale and liabilities related to assets held for sale, respectively, on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003. During the first quarter of 2003 , we disposed of ten day spas and effective April 15, 2003 the assets of the remaining four day spas to be disposed of were sold.

Steiner Leisure and Steiner Transocean Limited, our subsidiary that conducts our shipboard operations, are Bahamas international business companies ("IBCs"). The Bahamas does not tax Bahamas IBCs. Under current legislation, we believe that income from our maritime operations will be foreign source income that will not be subject to United States, United Kingdom or other taxation. A significant portion of our income for the first six months of 2003 was not subject to tax in the United States or other jurisdictions. Earnings from Steiner Training Limited and Elemis Limited, United Kingdom subsidiaries, are subject to U.K. tax rates (generally up to 31%). The income from our United States subsidiaries, Steiner Beauty Products, Inc. (which sells products in the U.S.), Steiner Management Services, LLC (which performs administrative services), Steiner Spa Resorts (Nevada), Inc. (which runs the spa at the Aladdin Resort), Steiner Spa Resorts (Connecticut), Inc. (which runs our spa at the Moh egan Sun Casino) and Steiner Education Group, Inc. (which runs our schools through its subsidiaries) will generally be subject to U.S. federal income tax at regular corporate rates (generally up to 35%) and may be subject to additional U.S. federal, state and local taxes. Steiner Spa Limited and Steiner Spa Asia Limited own 100% of Mandara US and Mandara Asia, respectively. These subsidiaries pay taxes in certain taxable jurisdictions.

We have identified the policies outlined below as critical to our business operations and an understanding of our results of operations. The listing is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, with no need for management's judgment in their application. The impact on our business operations and any associated risks related to these policies is discussed under results of operations, below, where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 15 of Steiner Leisure's Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Note that our pre paration of this Form 10-Q requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates.

14

Cost of revenues includes:

Cost of revenues may be affected by, among other things, sales mix, production levels, exchange rates, changes in supplier prices and discounts, purchasing and manufacturing efficiencies, tariffs, duties, freight and inventory costs. Certain cruise line agreements provide for increases in the percentages of services and products revenues and/or, as the case may be, the amount of minimum annual line commissions over the terms of such agreements. These payments may also be increased under new agreements with cruise lines and land-based lessors that replace expiring agreements. In general, we have experienced increases in these payments as a percentage of revenues upon entering into new agreements with cruise lines.

Cost of products includes the cost of products sold through our various methods of distribution. To a lesser extent, cost of products also includes the cost of products consumed in rendering services. This amount would not be a material component of the cost of services rendered and would not be practicable to identify separately.

Operating expenses include administrative expenses, salary and payroll taxes. In addition, operating expenses include amortization of intangibles relating to our acquisitions of resort spas in 2001.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets in question. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease. For certain properties, leasehold improvements are amortized over the lease term which includes renewal periods that may be obtained at our option, that are considered significant to the continuation of our operations and to the existence of leasehold improvements the value of which would be impaired by our discontinuing use of the leased property. We perform ongoing evaluations of the estimated useful lives of our property and equipment for depreciation purposes. The estimated useful lives are determined and continually evaluated based on the period over which services are expected to be rendered by the asset, industry practice and asset maintenance policies. Maintenance and repai r items are expensed as incurred.

We adopted SFAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" on January 1, 2002. In lieu of amortization for 2002, we were required to perform an initial impairment review of our goodwill and are required to perform an annual impairment review thereafter. During the second quarter of 2002, we completed our assessment of our intangible assets and wrote off $29.6 million of intangible assets. Those intangibles primarily consisted of goodwill related to our July 2001 acquisitions of the Greenhouse and C.Spa day spa chains. The write-off has been accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and has been recorded effective January 1, 2002. As of June 30, 2003, we had unamortized goodwill and intangibles of $52.1 million.

15

As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves our estimating our actual current tax exposure together with an assessment of temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or increase this allowance in a period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the statement of operations.

Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We have recorded a valuation allowance of $24.8 million (which includes $22.2 million related to our discontinued operations) as of June 30, 2003, due to uncertainties related to our ability to utilize some of our deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating losses carried forward, before they expire. The valuation allowance is based on our estimates of taxable income and the period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, we may need to establish an additional valuation allowance which could impact our financial position and results of operations.

In June 2002, FASB issued SFAS 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities," which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring." The principal difference between SFAS 146 and EITF 94-3 relates to SFAS 146's requirements for recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity. SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under EITF 94-3, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entity's commitment to an exit plan. A fundamental conclusion reached by FASB in this statement is that an entity's commitment to a plan, by itself, does not create an obligation that meets the definition of a liability. Therefore, SFAS 146 eliminates the definition and requirements for recognition of exit costs in EITF 94-3. SFAS 146 also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The effective date of the SFAS 146 is January 1, 2003, with earlier adoption encouraged. In connection with its discontinued day spa operations, we adopted SFAS 146 in 2002.

In January 2003, FASB issued Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." FIN 46 requires an investor with a majority of the variable interests in a variable interest entity to consolidate the entity and also requires majority and significant variable interest investors to provide certain disclosures. A variable interest entity is an entity in which the equity investors do not have a controlling interest or the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity's activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from the other parties. It applies to the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. Management is currently assessing the impact of FIN 46 on the Company consolidated financial statements.

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity." SFAS 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. In accordance with SFAS 150, financial instruments that embody obligations for the issuer are required to be classified as liabilities. SFAS 150 is effective for financial for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise shall be effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. There was no impact to the Company's consolidated financial statements upon the adoption of the provisions of SFAS 150.

16

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, certain selected income statement data expressed as a percentage of revenues: