SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

_________________

FORM 10-K

Commission File #333-4356

COAST HOTELS AND CASINOS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (702) 365-7000

Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(B) of The Act: None

Securities Registered Pursuant To Section 12(G) of The Act: Common Stock, $ .01 Par Value

(Title of class)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [   ]

        Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

        Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an Accelerated Filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes [ ] No [X]

        The number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2003 was 1,000 shares, none of which was held by non-affiliates of the Registrant.

COAST HOTELS AND CASINOS, INC.

Table of Contents

Annual Report on Form 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002

PART I

Item 1. Business

The Company

        Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. (‘the Company” or “Coast Hotels”) is a Nevada corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Coast Casinos, Inc. (“Coast Casinos”). Coast Casinos changed its name from Coast Resorts, Inc. on July 2, 2002. We own and operate four Las Vegas hotel-casinos:

        The following chart provides certain information about our properties as of December 31, 2002:

        Our principal executive office is located at 4500 West Tropicana Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89103. The telephone number is (702) 365-7000.

Business and Marketing Strategy

        Our business and marketing strategy is to attract gaming customers to our casinos by offering consistently high quality gaming, hotel, entertainment and dining experiences at affordable prices. We emphasize attracting and retaining repeat customers. Our primary target market for The Orleans, the Gold Coast and the Suncoast consists of value-oriented local middle-market customers who gamble frequently. The Barbary Coast’s customer base is primarily composed of visitors to the Las Vegas area.

        While a significant portion of our customers are local residents, the same factors that appeal to local residents also appeal to visitors to Las Vegas, including better odds on slot and video poker machines and lower minimum wager limits on our table games than those traditionally found at Strip casinos. In addition to the growing local resident market, Las Vegas is one of the fastest growing entertainment markets in the United States.

1

Item 1. Business (continued)

Business and Marketing Strategy (continued)

        We believe that the most important factors in successfully operating our casinos are convenient locations with easy access, a friendly atmosphere, a value-oriented approach and high quality restaurants, entertainment and amenities. Additionally, we offer Las Vegas visitors spacious, well appointed and competitively priced guest rooms.

Casino Properties

         The Orleans. The Orleans is strategically located on Tropicana Avenue, a short distance from the Las Vegas Strip and McCarran International Airport. The Orleans provides an upscale, off-Strip experience in an exciting New Orleans French Quarter-themed environment.

        The Orleans features an approximately 135,000 square foot casino, including approximately 2,968 slot machines, 64 table games, a keno lounge, a poker parlor and race and sports books. The Orleans has 1,426 hotel rooms, 18 “stadium seating” first-run movie theaters, a 70-lane bowling center, approximately 40,000 square feet of banquet and meeting facilities, including an approximately 17,000 square foot grand ballroom, six full-service restaurants and a multi-station buffet, specialty themed bars, a swimming pool, a barber shop, a beauty salon, a child care facility, a video arcade and approximately 6,000 parking spaces. The Orleans also includes an 850-seat showroom that features headliner entertainment and other special events, allowing us to attract more tourists who would otherwise gamble at Strip casinos. A special events arena that will seat up to 9,500 patrons is scheduled to open in May 2003. The arena is designed to handle concerts, trade shows, equestrian events, boxing, ice hockey and other sporting events.

2

Item 1. Business (continued)

Casino Properties (continued)

        Gold Coast. The Gold Coast is located on West Flamingo Road approximately one mile west of the Las Vegas Strip and one-quarter mile west of Interstate 15, the major highway linking Las Vegas and Southern California. Its strategic location offers easy access from all four directions in the Las Vegas valley.

        The Gold Coast features an approximately 87,000 square foot casino, including approximately 2,186 slot machines, 52 table games, a keno lounge, a 160-seat race and sports book and a 700-seat bingo parlor. Our eleven-story tower includes 711 hotel rooms and suites, a swimming pool and fitness center. The Gold Coast also features four full-service restaurants, a multi-station buffet restaurant, a fast-food restaurant, a snack bar and an ice cream parlor. Entertainment amenities include a 70-lane bowling center, approximately 16,000 square feet of banquet and meeting facilities, four bars, an entertainment lounge and a showroom/dance hall with live musical entertainment. Other amenities include a gift shop, a liquor store, an American Express office, a Western Union office, a beauty salon, a barber shop, a childcare facility and approximately 3,000 parking spaces.

        Suncoast.       The Suncoast serves one of the fastest growing areas of the Las Vegas valley and is located on approximately 50 acres in Peccole Ranch, a master-planned community adjacent to Summerlin. The Suncoast is strategically located at the intersection of Rampart Boulevard and Alta Drive, readily accessible from most major points in Las Vegas, including downtown (approximately eight miles) and the Strip (approximately nine miles).

        The Suncoast is a Mediterranean-themed facility featuring approximately 82,000 square feet of casino space, including approximately 2,306 slot machines, 58 table games, a 150-seat race and sports book and a 600-seat bingo parlor. The Suncoast has 419 spacious hotel rooms and suites, approximately 25,000 square feet of banquet and meeting facilities, 16 “stadium seating” movie theaters, four full-service restaurants, a multi-station buffet restaurant, a 64-lane bowling center, a swimming pool and approximately 6,000 parking spaces.

        Barbary Coast. The Barbary Coast is located at the intersection of Flamingo Road and Las Vegas Boulevard, one of the busiest intersections on the Strip, along with Caesars Palace, Bally’s Las Vegas and Bellagio. Historically, the Barbary Coast has relied on foot traffic on the Las Vegas Strip for a significant amount of its revenues. As a result, the Barbary Coast’s primary customer base is visitors to the Las Vegas area. In addition to its favorable location on the Strip, the Barbary Coast has also benefited from its more intimate gaming atmosphere, allowing it to develop a loyal base of table games and slot customers.

        The Barbary Coast features an approximately 30,000 square foot casino, including approximately 610 slot machines, 36 table games, a race and sports book and other amenities. Our eight-story tower includes 197 spacious rooms and suites. The Barbary Coast is furnished and decorated in an elegant turn-of-the-century Victorian theme and includes three bars and three restaurants: Michael’s gourmet restaurant, Drai’s on the Strip (leased to and operated by a third party) and the Victorian Room.

3

Item 1. Business (continued)

Gaming Security

        Each of our casinos employs extensive supervision and accounting procedures to control the handling of cash in their gaming operations. These measures include security personnel, closed-circuit television observation of critical areas of the casino, locked cash boxes, independent auditors and observers, strict sign-in and sign-out procedures which ensure, to the extent practicable, that gaming chips issued by, and returned to, the casino cashier’s cages are accurately accounted for, and procedures for the regular observation of gaming employees. The accounting departments of each of our casinos, which employ persons who have no involvement in the gaming operations, review on a daily basis records compiled by gaming employees pertaining to cash flow and credit extension. Moreover, regular periodic analysis of the results of our gaming operations, including analyses of our compliance with the internal control standards established by the Nevada State Gaming Control Board (the “Nevada Board”), are performed by us and our independent auditors to detect significant deviations from industry standards. Based on the results of these analyses, management believes that its procedures are in compliance in all material respects with the requirements established by the Nevada Gaming Commission (the “Nevada Commission”) and the Nevada Board.

Competition

        There is intense competition among companies in the gaming industry. The Orleans, the Gold Coast and the Suncoast compete primarily with Las Vegas hotel-casinos and non-hotel gaming facilities that target local residents. There are several undeveloped properties in the vicinity of The Orleans, the Gold Coast and the Suncoast on which new gaming facilities could be built. The construction of new properties and the expansion or enhancement of existing properties near our hotel-casinos could have a negative impact on our business.

        In contrast to our other casinos, the Barbary Coast competes for customers primarily with the hotel-casinos located on the Strip. The construction of new properties and the expansion or enhancement of existing properties on the Strip by competitors could materially adversely affect business and results of operations of the Barbary Coast.

        In addition, each of our locals-oriented properties competes, to a lesser extent, with all other casinos and hotels in the Las Vegas area. A number of new hotel-casinos or expansions have opened in Las Vegas over the last several years, and several others have been announced. This additional gaming and room capacity may have a negative impact on our business.

        We also compete with other legalized forms of gaming and gaming operations in other parts of the state of Nevada and elsewhere. Certain states have recently legalized, and several other states are currently considering legalizing, casino gaming in designated areas. We also face competition from casinos located on Native American reservations. We believe that the development by Native Americans and other casino properties similar to those in Las Vegas in areas close to Nevada, particularly California and Arizona, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. California law permits limited Las Vegas-style gaming activities to be conducted by California Native American tribes and several tribes have expanded, opened or plan to open casinos in California. An increase in gaming in California could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

4

Item 1. Business (continued)

Potential Future Developments

        From time to time in our ordinary course of business we review proposals for new developments, joint ventures and other strategic transactions. We cannot assure you that any such new developments, ventures or transactions will be pursued or, if pursued, will be successful.

Employees

        At December 31, 2002, we had approximately 7,286 employees. We have not experienced any significant work stoppages and believe our labor relations are good. Approximately 337 employees at the Barbary Coast are covered by a collective bargaining agreement; none of our other employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

Nevada Regulation and Licensing

        The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in Nevada are subject to (i) the Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the “Nevada Act”), and (ii) various local regulations. Our gaming operations are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the Nevada Commission, the Nevada Board and the Clark County Liquor and Gaming Licensing Board (the “Clark County Board”). The Nevada Commission, the Nevada Board and the Clark County Board are collectively referred to as the “Nevada Gaming Authorities.”

        The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada Gaming Authorities are based upon declarations of public policy which seek to, among other things, (i) prevent unsavory or unsuitable persons from having any direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity, (ii) establish and maintain responsible accounting practices and procedures, (iii) maintain effective control over the financial practices of licensees, including establishing minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Nevada Gaming Authorities, (iv) prevent cheating and fraudulent practices and (v) provide a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees. Changes in such laws, regulations and procedures could have an adverse effect on our gaming operations.

        We operate the Gold Coast, the Barbary Coast, The Orleans and the Suncoast, and are licensed by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The gaming licenses require the periodic payment of fees and taxes and are not transferable. Coast Casinos is registered with the Nevada Commission as a publicly traded corporation (a “Registered Corporation”) and has been found suitable to own the stock of Coast Hotels. Coast Casinos, as a Registered Corporation, and Coast Hotels, as a Corporate Licensee, are required periodically to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission and furnish any other information that the Nevada Commission may request. No person may become a stockholder of, or receive any percentage of the profits from, Coast Hotels without first obtaining licenses and approvals from the Nevada Gaming Authorities. Coast Hotels and Coast Casinos have obtained from the Nevada Gaming Authorities the various registrations, approvals, permits and licenses required in order to engage in gaming activities at its hotel-casinos.

5

Item 1. Business (continued)

Nevada Regulation and Licensing (continued)

        The Nevada Gaming Authorities may investigate any individual who has a material relationship to, or material involvement with, Coast Hotels or Coast Casinos in order to determine whether such individual is suitable or should be licensed as a business associate of a Corporate Licensee or a Registered Corporation. Officers, directors and certain key employees of Coast Hotels must file applications with the Nevada Gaming Authorities and may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. Officers, directors and key employees of Coast Hotels who are actively and directly involved in gaming activities may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Nevada Gaming Authorities may deny an application for licensing for any cause, which they deem reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing, and both require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough investigation. The applicant for licensing or a finding of suitability must pay all the costs of the investigation. Changes in licensed positions must be reported to the Nevada Gaming Authorities and, in addition to their authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability or licensure, the Nevada Gaming Authorities have jurisdiction to disapprove a change in a corporate position.

        If the Nevada Gaming Authorities were to find an officer, director or key employee of Coast Hotels or Coast Casinos unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with Coast Hotels or Coast Casinos, we would have to sever all relationships with such person. In addition, the Nevada Commission may require the Company and Coast Casinos to terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Determinations of suitability or of questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.

        Coast Hotels and Coast Casinos are required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission. Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by Coast Hotels must be reported to, or approved by, the Nevada Commission.

        If it were determined that the Nevada Act was violated by Coast Hotels, the gaming licenses it holds could be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, Coast Hotels, Coast Casinos and the persons involved could be subject to substantial fines for each separate violation of the Nevada Act at the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Further, a supervisor could be appointed by the Nevada Commission to operate our gaming properties and, under certain circumstances, earnings generated during the supervisor’s appointment (except for the reasonable rental value of our gaming properties) could be forfeited to the State of Nevada. Limitation, conditioning or suspension of any gaming license or the appointment of a supervisor could (and revocation of any gaming license would) materially adversely affect the Company’s gaming operations.

        Any beneficial holder of a Registered Corporation’s voting securities, regardless of the number of shares owned, may be required to file an application, be investigated, and have his suitability as a beneficial holder of a Registered Corporation’s voting securities determined if the Nevada Commission has reason to believe that such ownership would otherwise be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Nevada. The applicant must pay all costs of investigation incurred by the Nevada Gaming Authorities in conducting any such investigation.

6

Item 1. Business (continued)

Nevada Regulation and Licensing (continued)

        The Nevada Act requires any person who acquires beneficial ownership of more than 5% of a Registered Corporation’s voting securities to report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission. The Nevada Act requires that beneficial owners of more than 10% of a Registered Corporation’s voting securities apply to the Nevada Commission for a finding of suitability within 30 days after the Chairman of the Nevada Board mails the written notice requiring such filing. Under certain circumstances, an “institutional investor,” as defined in the Nevada Act, which acquires more than 10%, but not more than 15% of a Registered Corporation’s voting securities may apply to the Nevada Commission for a waiver of such finding of suitability if such institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor will not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of the members of the board of directors of a Registered Corporation, any change in a Registered Corporation’s corporate charter, bylaws, management, policies or operations, or any of its gaming affiliates, or any other action which the Nevada Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding the Registered Corporation’s voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are not deemed to be inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes only include: (i) voting on all matters voted on by stockholders; (ii) making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in its management policies or operations; and (iii) such other activities as the Nevada Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment intent. If the beneficial holder of voting securities who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information including a list of beneficial owners. The applicant is required to pay all costs of investigation

        Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within 30 days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission or the Chairman of the Nevada Board, may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner if the owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial owner. Any stockholder found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the voting securities of a Registered Corporation beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Nevada Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. Coast Hotels is subject to disciplinary action if, after it receives notice that a person is unsuitable to be a stockholder or to have any other relationship with Coast Hotels or Coast Casinos, we (i) pay that person any dividend or interest upon voting securities of our company, (ii) allow that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities held by that person, (iii) pay remuneration in any form to that person for services rendered or otherwise, or (iv) fail to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his voting securities, including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of such voting securities for cash at fair market value.

        The Nevada Commission may, at its discretion, require the holder of any debt security of a Corporate Licensee or a Registered Corporation to file applications, be investigated and be found suitable to own the debt security. If the Nevada Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own such security, then pursuant to the Nevada Act, the Corporate Licensee or the Registered Corporation can be sanctioned, including the loss of its licenses, if without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission, it: (i) pays to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest or any distribution whatsoever; (ii) recognizes any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities; (iii) pays the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or (iv) makes any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation or similar transaction.

7

Item 1. Business (continued)

Nevada Regulation and Licensing (continued)

        Coast Hotels is required to maintain a current stock ledger in Nevada, which may be examined by the Nevada Gaming Authorities at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Nevada Gaming Authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. Coast Hotels is also required to render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner. The Nevada Commission has the power to require our stock certificates to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Nevada Act.

        Licensed Corporations and Registered Corporations such as Coast Hotels and Coast Casinos may not make public offering of their securities without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission if the securities or proceeds therefrom are intended to be used to construct, acquire or finance gaming facilities in Nevada, or to require or extend obligations incurred for such purposes. The Nevada Commission has previously granted exemptions from this prior approval process for certain public offerings by Coast Hotels and Coast Casinos. Approval of a public offering, if given, will not constitute a finding, recommendation or approval by the Nevada Commission or the Nevada Board as to the accuracy or adequacy of the prospectus or the investment merits of the securities. Any representation to the contrary is unlawful.

        Changes in control of a Registered Corporation through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements, or any act or conduct by a person whereby he obtains control, may not occur without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission. Entities seeking to acquire control of a Registered Corporation must satisfy the Nevada Board and Nevada Commission with respect to a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control of such Registered Corporation. The Nevada Commission may also require controlling stockholders, officers, directors and other persons having a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control, to be investigated and licensed as a part of the approval process relating to the transaction.

        The Nevada legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of voting securities and corporate defense tactics affecting Licensed Corporations, and Registered Corporations that are affiliated with those operations, may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Nevada Commission has established a regulatory scheme to ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevada’s gaming industry and to further Nevada’s policy to: (i) assure the financial stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates; (ii) preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and (iii) promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs. Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Nevada Commission before a Registered Corporation can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above the current market price thereof and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. The Nevada Act also requires prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by a Registered Corporation’s Board of Directors in response to a tender offer made directly to the Registered Corporation’s stockholders for the purposes of acquiring control of the Registered Corporation.

        License fees and taxes, computed in various ways depending on the type of gaming or activity involved, are payable to the State of Nevada and to the counties and cities in which the Nevada licensee’s respective operations are conducted. Depending upon the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable monthly, quarterly or annually and are based upon either: (i) a percentage of the gross revenues received; (ii) the number of gaming devices operated; or (iii) the number of table games operated. A casino entertainment tax is also paid by casino operations where entertainment is furnished in connection with the selling of food or refreshments.

8

Item 1. Business (continued)

Nevada Regulation and Licensing (continued)

        Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to be registered, or is under common control with such persons (collectively, “Licensees”), and who proposes to become involved in a gaming venture outside of Nevada is required to deposit with the Nevada Board, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $10,000 to pay the expenses of investigation of the Nevada Board of their participation in such foreign gaming. The revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease at the discretion of the Nevada Commission.

        Thereafter, Licensees are required to comply with certain reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada Act. Licensees are also subject to disciplinary action by the Nevada Commission if they knowingly violate any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the foreign gaming operation, fail to conduct the foreign gaming operation in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations, engage in activities that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees, or employ a person in the foreign operation who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada on the grounds of personal unsuitability.

        Coast Hotels may pursue development opportunities in other jurisdictions and expects that if it does so it will be subject to similar rigorous regulatory standards in each other jurisdiction in which it seeks to conduct gaming operations. There can be no assurance that regulations adopted, permits required or taxes imposed, by other jurisdictions will permit profitable operations by Coast Hotels in those jurisdictions.

Certain Forward-Looking Statements

        This Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the securities laws. All statements regarding our expected financial position, business strategies and financing plans under the headings “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, “Business” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. In addition, in those and other portions of this Form 10-K, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “seeks,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends” and similar expressions, as they relate to Coast Hotels or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, and have based these expectations on our beliefs as well as assumptions we have made, such expectations may prove to be incorrect. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such expectations are disclosed in this Form 10-K, including, without limitation, the following factors:

9

Item 1. Business (continued)

Certain Forward-Looking Statements (continued)

        All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by our cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements included are made only as of the date of this Form 10-K. We do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update these forward-looking statements.

Item 2. Properties

        The Orleans occupies a portion of an approximately 80-acre site located on West Tropicana Avenue, approximately one mile south of the Gold Coast. We lease the real property under a ground lease entered into by Coast Hotels and the Tiberti Company, a Nevada general partnership of which J. Tito Tiberti, a stockholder and director of Coast Casinos and a director of Coast Hotels, is managing partner. The lease had an effective commencement date of October 1, 1995, an initial term of 50 years, and includes an option, exercisable by us, to extend the initial term for an additional 25 years. The lease provides for monthly rental payments of $200,000 per month through February 2002, $225,000 per month during the 48-month period thereafter, and $250,000 per month during the 60-month period thereafter. In March 2011, annual rental payments will increase on a compounding basis at a rate of 3.0% per annum. In addition, we have been granted an option to purchase the real property during the two-year period commencing in February 2016. The lease provides that the purchase price will be the fair market value of the real property at the time we exercise the option, provided that the purchase price will not be less than 10 times, nor more than 12 times, annual rent at such time.

        We own the approximately 26 acres that the Gold Coast occupies on West Flamingo Road. We also own an 8.33-acre site across the street from the Gold Coast that contains an approximately 100,000 square foot warehouse. We use the warehouse primarily as a storage facility.

        The Suncoast is located in the west end of the Las Vegas valley and occupies an approximately 50-acre site that we lease pursuant to a Ground Lease Agreement dated as of October 28, 1994. The initial term of the lease expires on December 31, 2055. The lease contains three options, exercisable by us, to extend the term of the lease for 10 years each. The lease provided for monthly rental payments of $166,667 for the year ended December 31, 1995. Thereafter, the monthly rent increases by the amount of $5,000 in January of each year. The landlord has the option to require us to purchase the property at the end of 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, at the fair market value of the real property at the time the landlord exercises the option, provided that the purchase price will not be less than 10 times nor more than 15 times the annual rent at such time. Based on the terms of the lease, the potential purchase price commitment ranges from approximately $31.0 million to approximately $51.0 million in the years 2014 through 2018. We have a right of first refusal in the event the landlord desires to sell the property at any time during the lease term.

10

Item 2. Properties (continued)

        The Barbary Coast occupies approximately 1.8 acres at the intersection of Flamingo Road and the Strip that we lease pursuant to a lease dated May 1, 1993. The lease provides for rental payments of $175,000 per year during the initial term of the lease that expires on May 1, 2003. We have exercised the first of two 30-year options, with rental payments increasing to $190,000 per year during the first ten years of the renewal period. We have an option to purchase the leased property at any time during the six month period prior to the expiration of the initial term of the lease, provided that certain conditions are met, at a purchase price equal to the greater of $3.5 million or the then appraised value of the real property. Should the landlord desire to sell the real property during the initial term of the lease, we have a right of first refusal. We also own approximately 2.5 additional acres of real property located adjacent to the Barbary Coast that we use for valet parking and as a parking lot for our employees. We purchased the land (which we previously leased) for $18.1 million on January 17, 2003.

        In the fourth quarter of 2001 and the first quarter of 2002, we purchased land totaling approximately 60 acres for possible future development. The land is located in a gaming enterprise district on Las Vegas Boulevard South, adjacent to Interstate 15 and approximately 6 miles south of Tropicana Avenue. Subject to market conditions, availability of financing and receipt of required governmental approvals, we intend to develop a hotel-casino on the site. We are currently in the conceptual stage of the project and have not developed any plans, but anticipate beginning construction of the hotel-casino in the second quarter of 2004 and opening in the second half of 2005. There is no guarantee that we will actually develop the project.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

        We are currently, and are from time to time, involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are currently subject to lawsuits in which the plaintiffs have sought punitive damages. We intend to continue to defend the lawsuits vigorously. We do not believe that such litigation, including the foregoing proceedings, will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        No matters were submitted to our shareholder during the quarter ended December 31, 2002.

11

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

        We are a wholly owned subsidiary of Coast Casinos. None of our equity securities are publicly traded.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

        The following Selected Financial Data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The balance sheet and statements of operations data as of and for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2002 are derived from our audited financial statements. Our financial statements as of December 31, 2001 and 2002 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 are included in this report on Form 10-K. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected in the future.

_________________

See Footnotes to Selected Financial Data.

12

Item 6. Selected Financial Data (continued)

13

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

        We have identified the following critical accounting policies that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements. The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires that we make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate those estimates, including those related to asset impairment, accruals for slot marketing points, self-insurance, compensation and related benefits, revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, contingencies and litigation. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

        We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements:

14

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates (continued)

Results of Operations

        The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain financial information regarding the results of our operations:

15

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Fiscal 2002 Compared to 2001

        In the year ended December 31, 2002, revenues increased but net income decreased as we faced many challenges including a weakened economy, construction disruption, increased competition and a continued slowdown in tourist visitation to Las Vegas as a result of the events of September 11, 2001. Most of the increase in revenues was from the continued growth at our newest hotel-casino, the Suncoast, but revenues also increased slightly at the Gold Coast and Barbary Coast. Revenues were lower at The Orleans for the year, but increased by 10.8% in the fourth quarter as we began to see the positive effects of the 586 new rooms opened in August 2002 and a decrease in construction disruption as the two-year expansion project neared completion.

        Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2002 was lower by $8.2 million, primarily due to an increase in general and administrative expenses and depreciation. Net income was $31.7 million in 2002 compared to $36.5 million in 2001, a decrease of 13.0%.

        Casino.       Casino revenues were $406.2 million in 2002 compared to $387.5 million in 2001, an increase of $18.7 million (4.8%) primarily due to a 15.2% increase at the Suncoast as we continued to attract customers from the growing market in the Summerlin area of western Las Vegas. Casino revenues at the Gold Coast increased 2.2% for the year, but were down 3.4% in the fourth quarter due, in part, to construction disruption from the new parking garage. The main section of the garage was completed in December 2002, eliminating most of the construction barriers to customer traffic flow. Casino revenues at the Barbary Coast were up 5.0% in 2002, primarily from an increase in table games wagering volume. The Barbary Coast table games win percentage also improved compared to the lower-than-expected win percentage in 2001. Casino revenues at The Orleans were down 3.0% in the year ended December 31, 2002, but were 6.0% higher in the fourth quarter due, in part, to an increase in tourist customers because of the 586 new hotel rooms opened in August.

        Casino expenses were $182.1 million in 2002 compared to $174.2 million in 2001, an increase of 4.5%. The increase was primarily due to increased salaries at the recently expanded Gold Coast and The Orleans, as well as to increased promotional expenses at the Suncoast.

        Food and Beverage. Gross food and beverage revenues were $112.8 million in 2002 compared to $106.9 million in 2001, an increase of 5.5%. The increase was primarily due to a 12.5% increase at the Suncoast, in line with the continued increase in customer volume, and an increase of 7.6% at the Gold Coast due to the greater number of meals served in its larger new buffet, opened in December 2001. Food and beverage revenues at The Orleans and the Barbary Coast in 2002 were relatively flat compared to 2001.

        Food and beverage expenses were $83.9 million in 2002 compared to $77.8 million in 2001, an increase of 7.8% due primarily to the larger new buffet that opened at the Gold Coast in December 2001. Costs in the Gold Coast buffet increased in 2002 due to higher staffing levels and more elaborate food offerings than in the old buffet.

16

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Fiscal 2002 Compared to 2001 (continued)

        Hotel expenses were $17.3 million in 2002 compared to $15.1 million in 2001, an increase of 15.0%. Gold Coast and Barbary Coast expenses were relatively flat compared to the prior year, but expenses at The Orleans and the Suncoast increased 24.9% and 34.5%, respectively, due to the increased number of rooms at those properties.

        Other.       Other revenues are derived primarily from bowling, retail, entertainment and leased facilities. In the year ended December 31, 2002, other revenues were $39.7 million compared to $36.7 million in 2001. The increase of 8.1% was due primarily to a 21.8% increase at the Suncoast, where retail sales and showroom revenue were up 30.5% and 78.5%, respectively, because of increased customer volume. Gold Coast other revenues also increased by 5.9% due to the relocation of retail facilities to a high-traffic-area near the hotel front desk. Other revenues at The Orleans were relatively flat compared to the prior year, but Barbary Coast other revenues were 17.3% higher due to a one year lease of space to a third party.

        Other expenses were $29.4 million in 2002 compared to $27.9 million in 2001, an increase of 5.3%, in line with the increase in other revenues. Other expenses at the Barbary Coast and The Orleans were relatively flat compared to the prior year, but Gold Coast other expenses increased by 7.7% and Suncoast other expenses increased by 15.4%.

        General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $104.2 million in 2002 compared to $91.5 million in 2001, an increase of 13.9%, primarily due to increases in payroll and related costs, utilities expenses, property taxes and insurance costs.

        Payroll and related costs increased by $5.3 million (10.3%), affected by increased staffing levels at The Orleans and the Gold Coast due to the recent expansions at those properties, as well as third quarter 2002 pay raises and higher health insurance costs. Utilities expenses were $15.2 million in 2002 compared to $13.6 million in 2001, an increase of 11.4% primarily due to recently completed expansions at The Orleans and the Gold Coast and higher utility rates. Property taxes were $5.7 million in 2002 compared to $4.7 million in 2001, an increase of 21.8% primarily because of the expansions. General insurance costs were $2.4 million in 2002 compared to $1.3 million in 2001, an increase of 76.4% because of increased premiums after the terrorist activities of September 11, 2001.

        Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense was $41.6 million in 2002 compared to $36.5 million in 2001, an increase of 13.8% due to the depreciation of remodeling expenditures and equipment purchases at the Gold Coast and The Orleans. Depreciation expense at the Suncoast increased by 6.9% due to the opening of new hotel rooms in August 2001 and the addition of slot machines during 2002.

17

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Fiscal 2002 Compared to 2001 (continued)

        Other Income (Expenses). Interest expense was $33.2 million in 2002 compared to $30.6 million in 2001, an increase of 8.3%, primarily due to higher aggregate indebtedness related to financing of various expansion projects at the Gold Coast and The Orleans. Interest expense was offset by approximately $1.7 million of interest earned on an interest rate swap agreement that was entered into in April 2002 and terminated in July 2002. Capitalized interest was $3.0 million in 2002 compared to $1.0 million in 2001 due to the advanced stages of completion of the expansion projects at The Orleans, including the new room tower opened in August and the arena that is expected to open in May 2003. Other income (expense) was $425,000 in 2002, including a loss on the disposal or abandonment of fixed assets of $2.3 million offset by a gain of $2.7 million on the interest rate swap agreement that was terminated in July 2002. Other expense of $1.8 million in 2001 was a loss on disposal of equipment.

Fiscal 2001 Compared to 2000

        Net revenues and operating income increased in the year ended December 31, 2001 due primarily to the strong performance of the Suncoast, which opened in September 2000. Construction disruption at the Gold Coast and The Orleans, a slowdown in tourist visitation to Las Vegas after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, recessionary economic trends and competition from new locals-oriented hotel-casinos resulted in decreases in revenues and operating income at The Orleans, the Gold Coast and the Barbary Coast. Net revenues in 2001 were $518.0 million compared to $408.9 million in 2000, an increase of 26.7%. Operating income was $86.3 million in 2001 compared to $64.3 million in 2000, an increase of 34.3%. Operating expenses increased by 25.3%, primarily as a result of the full year of operations at the Suncoast compared to only three and one-half months of Suncoast operations in 2000. Net income in 2001 increased 35.4% to $36.5 million compared to $27.0 million in 2000 due to the full-year results of the Suncoast.

        Casino.       Casino revenues were $387.5 million in 2001, an increase of 29.9% over 2000 casino revenues of $298.4 million. The increase was primarily due to the first full year of operations of the Suncoast. Construction disruption during a remodeling project contributed to a 2.7% decline in gaming revenues at the Gold Coast and the general slowdown in tourism after September 11 contributed to flat casino revenues at The Orleans and a 2.8% decline at the Barbary Coast. Casino expenses increased by 27.0% primarily because of the Suncoast, resulting in a casino operating margin of 55.0% in 2001 compared to 54.0% in 2000.

        Food and Beverage. For the year ended December 31, 2001, gross food and beverage revenues were $106.9 million, an increase of $22.1 million (26.1%) over 2000 revenues of $84.8 million, primarily due to the full year of operations at the Suncoast, which was only open for three and one-half months in 2000. Food and beverage expenses increased $15.7 million (25.3%), in line with the increase in revenues.

        Hotel.        Gross hotel room revenues were $38.4 million in 2001, an increase of $4.7 million (14.0%) over 2000 room revenues of $33.7 million. The increase was due to a full year of operations of the Suncoast, which was only open for three and one-half months in 2000, and the expansion of available rooms at the Suncoast in September 2001 from 232 to 419. This more than offset a decline in occupancy at all four properties after the terrorist attacks on September 11. The average daily room rate increased to $59.05 in 2001 from $58.56 in 2000 due to the higher room rates achieved by the Suncoast and increases at both The Orleans and Gold Coast. Guest room occupancy levels declined from 93.0% in 2000 to 89.0% in 2001 as a result of the events of September 11 and generally lower occupancy levels at the Gold Coast. Hotel expenses increased 9.3%, primarily due to the full year of Suncoast operations.

18

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Fiscal 2001 Compared to 2000 (continued)

        Other.        Other revenues increased 17.8% in 2001 to $36.7 million compared to $31.2 million in 2000, due to the full year of operations at the Suncoast. Costs related to the other revenues increased by 12.9% for the same reason.

        General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses were $91.5 million in 2001 compared to $69.4 million in 2000, an increase of 31.9% due primarily to the full year of operations at the Suncoast. General and administrative expenses at the other properties increased $5.2 million or 8.8% partly due to increased utility costs of $2.4 million.

        Pre-opening, Rent and Depreciation. There were no pre-opening expenses in 2001 compared to $6.2 million in 2000 due to the opening of the Suncoast in September 2000. Land lease expense and the related deferred rent expense were both higher in 2001 because the rent on the Suncoast land was capitalized during construction until it opened on September 12, 2000. Depreciation and amortization expense was higher in 2001 due primarily to a full year of operations at the Suncoast.

        Other Expenses. Other expenses were $31.0 million in 2001, an increase of 34.6% over 2000 other expenses of $23.0 million, due primarily to higher average debt levels and lower capitalized interest in 2001.

Aggregate Indebtedness and Fixed Payment Obligations

        Our total long-term indebtedness (including current maturities) and fixed payment obligations on the land leases are summarized by year below:

_________________

        During the year ended December 31, 2002 we made principal payments of $8.0 million net of borrowings on the senior secured credit facility and $150,000 in principal payments on other long-term debt. We have debt service payments due aggregating $17.2 million in 2003.

        We also have fixed payment obligations due during 2003 of $5.4 million. The total remaining fixed payment obligations under leases is $427.0 million. The fixed payment obligations represent payments due under operating lease agreements primarily for land on which three of our properties are located.

19

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Aggregate Indebtedness and Fixed Payment Obligations (continued)

        The Orleans occupies a portion of an approximately 80-acre site located on West Tropicana Avenue, approximately one mile south of the Gold Coast. We lease the real property under a ground lease entered into by Coast Hotels and the Tiberti Company, a Nevada general partnership of which J. Tito Tiberti, a director of both Coast Hotels and Coast Casinos, is managing partner. The lease had an effective commencement date of October 1, 1995, an initial term of 50 years, and includes an option, exercisable by us, to extend the initial term for an additional 25 years. The lease provides for monthly rental payments of $200,000 per month through February 2002, $225,000 per month during the 48-month period thereafter, and $250,000 per month during the 60-month period thereafter. In March 2011, annual rental payments will increase on a compounding basis at a rate of 3.0% per annum. In addition, we have been granted an option to purchase the real property during the two-year period commencing in February 2016. The lease provides that the purchase price will be the fair market value of the real property at the time we exercise the option, provided that the purchase price will not be less than 10 times, nor more than 12 times, annual rent at such time.

        The Suncoast is located in the west end of the Las Vegas valley and occupies an approximately 50-acre site that we lease pursuant to a Ground Lease Agreement dated as of October 28, 1994. The initial term of the lease expires on December 31, 2055. The lease contains three options, exercisable by us, to extend the term of the lease for 10 years each. The lease provided for monthly rental payments of $166,667 for the year ended December 31, 1995. Thereafter, the monthly rent increases by the amount of $5,000 in January of each year. The landlord has the option to require us to purchase the property at the end of 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, at the fair market value of the real property at the time the landlord exercises the option, provided that the purchase price will not be less than 10 times nor more than 15 times the annual rent at such time. Based on the terms of the lease, the potential purchase price commitment ranges from approximately $31.0 million to approximately $51.0 million in the years 2014 through 2018. We have a right of first refusal in the event the landlord desires to sell the property at any time during the lease term.

        The Barbary Coast occupies approximately 1.8 acres at the intersection of Flamingo Road and the Strip that we lease pursuant to a lease dated May 1, 1993. The lease provides for rental payments of $175,000 per year during the initial term of the lease that expires on May 1, 2003. We have exercised the first of two 30-year options, with rental payments increasing to $190,000 per year during the first ten years of the renewal period. We have an option to purchase the leased property at any time during the six month period prior to the expiration of the initial term of the lease, provided that certain conditions are met, at a purchase price equal to the greater of $3.5 million or the then appraised value of the real property. Should the landlord desire to sell the real property during the initial term of the lease, we have a right of first refusal. See also Item 2 “Properties” for a discussion of our properties.

20

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Our principal sources of liquidity have consisted of cash provided by operating activities and debt financing. Cash provided by operating activities was $97.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $84.7 million in 2001 and $69.9 million in 2000.

        Cash used in investing activities in each of the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 was primarily for capital expenditures. During 2002, cash used for capital expenditures was $199.5 million, including $34.1 million for construction accounts payable at December 31, 2001. $156.3 million was used in the expansion and remodeling projects at the Gold Coast and The Orleans. $15.8 million was used to purchase a 1996 Bombardier CRJ200 jet aircraft for $17.8 million, including the trade-in of our 1980 Hawker-Siddely jet aircraft valued, net of accumulated depreciation, at $2.0 million. The remaining $27.4 million was used for maintenance capital expenditures. Cash used in investing activities in 2001 and 2000 was $101.7 million and $176.9 million, respectively.

        Cash provided by financing activities was $94.3 million in 2002 primarily from borrowings under our senior secured credit facility and the issuance in March 2002 of $100.0 million principal amount of senior subordinated notes, offset by the net proceeds from the notes of $103.2 million which were used to repay borrowings under the credit facility. In 2001, cash provided by financing activities was $16.8 million. Proceeds from the issuance in February 2001 of $50.0 million principal amount of senior subordinated notes and from borrowings under our senior secured credit facility were partially offset by reductions of amounts outstanding under the credit facility with cash flows from operations and approximately $49.1 million of net proceeds from the senior subordinated notes issuance. Cash provided by financing activities was $111.9 million in 2000, primarily from borrowings under our senior secured credit facility.

        In March 1999, we issued $175.0 million principal amount of 9.5% senior subordinated notes due in 2009 with interest payable on April 1 and October 1 beginning October 1, 1999 and entered into a $75.0 million senior secured credit facility due 2004 to facilitate a refinancing. Availability under the credit facility was increased to $200.0 million in September 1999, subject to automatic reductions in availability from September 2001 through June 2004, as described below. Coast Casinos is a guarantor of the indebtedness under both of these debt agreements. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest, selected monthly at our option, at a premium over the one-, two-, three- or six-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The premium varies depending on a certain financial ratio and can vary between 125 and 250 basis points. As of December 31, 2002, the premium over LIBOR was 2.0% (200 basis points) and the interest rate was 3.40%. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the weighted average interest rate for the senior secured credit facility was 3.63%. We incur a commitment fee, payable quarterly in arrears, on the unused portion of the credit facility. This variable fee is currently at the maximum rate of 0.5% per annum times the average unused portion of the facility.

        On February 2, 2001, we issued $50.0 million additional principal amount of senior subordinated notes. The net proceeds of approximately $49.1 million were used to reduce borrowings under our senior secured credit facility. On March 19, 2002, we issued $100.0 million additional principal amount of our senior subordinated notes. The notes were issued at a premium and the net proceeds of $103.2 million were used to reduce borrowings under our senior secured credit facility. The notes that were issued in 2001 and 2002 were issued under the same indenture and have the same terms, interest rate and maturity date as our original $175.0 million principal amount of senior subordinated notes issued in 1999.

21

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Liquidity and Capital Resources (continued)

        The availability under the senior secured credit facility has been reduced quarterly since September 30, 2001. On December 31, 2002, total availability was reduced to $159.0 million with additional quarterly reductions in availability of $8.5 million on each of March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003 and of $11.5 million on each of September 30, 2003, December 31, 2003, March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004. Advances under the facility may be used for working capital, general corporate purposes, and certain improvements to our existing properties. As of December 31, 2002, we had $136.0 million outstanding under the senior secured credit facility with $23.0 million of availability remaining.

        The loan agreement governing the senior secured credit facility contains covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of Coast Hotels to pay dividends or make advances to Coast Casinos, to make certain capital expenditures, to repay certain existing indebtedness, to incur additional indebtedness or to sell material assets. Additionally, the loan agreement requires that we maintain certain financial ratios with respect to its leverage and fixed charge coverage. We are also subject to certain covenants associated with the indenture governing our senior subordinated notes, including, in part, limitations on certain restricted payments, the incurrence of additional indebtedness and asset sales. At December 31, 2002, we were in compliance with all covenants and required ratios.

        The senior secured credit facility was amended in December 2001, March 2002, January 2003 and February 2003 to increase the limitations on certain capital expenditures, to allow for additional secured indebtedness and to allow for up to $20.0 million in unsecured indebtedness. The unsecured indebtedness will provide additional liquidity for a period of up to three months, during which time we will seek to amend and/or refinance the facility.

        In February 2003, we borrowed $18.0 million under a secured loan agreement, collateralized by our Bombardier aircraft. The proceeds were used to reduce borrowings under the senior secured credit facility. The loan bears interest at a premium of 2.25% over the 30-day LIBOR rate, which is adjusted monthly. Payments of interest only are required during the first twelve months. Commencing on March 28, 2004, we will be required to make monthly payments of principal of $120,000 plus interest on the unpaid balance. A balloon payment of the remaining principal balance is due in February 2009.

        On March 28, 2003, we entered into an unsecured $20.0 million revolving bridge line of credit (“bridge facility”) with a participant in our senior secured credit facility. Borrowings under the bridge facility bear interest at a premium of 3.5% over one-, two-, three-week or one month LIBOR. The bridge facility expires on June 26, 2003.

        As of March 28, 2003, we had $134.0 million outstanding under the senior secured credit facility and no outstanding borrowings under the bridge facility. We anticipate amending or replacing our senior secured credit facility in the second quarter of 2003 so that borrowings under the facility, in conjunction with existing cash balances and anticipated cash flow from operations will provide sufficient resources to meet our debt and lease payment obligations, operating needs and budgeted capital expenditure requirements at our hotel-casino properties for at least the next twelve months. If we are unable to amend or replace our credit facility, we may have to limit our future capital expenditures.

22

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Construction Projects

        In January 2001, we commenced an expansion of The Orleans. The expansion project included a special-events arena, a 586-room hotel tower, a 2,600-car parking garage, six additional movie theaters, two restaurants, an Irish pub and approximately 40,000 square feet of new gaming area and public space. Through December 31, 2002, we had completed all but the arena and had spent $143.7 million. We expect to open the arena in May 2003 with additional project expenditures of approximately $20.2 million.

        In the fourth quarter of 2000, we commenced an expansion and remodel of the Gold Coast. The project included a new, expanded buffet restaurant, a sports bar, an Asian-themed restaurant, an Italian restaurant, 10,000 square feet of additional meeting space, an additional approximately 20,000 square feet of slot and table games area, a new bingo room, an expanded porte-cochere and a parking garage. Through December 31, 2002, we had spent $68.9 million and had completed substantially all of the project except a portion of the parking garage. The garage was completed in the first quarter of 2003 with additional project expenditures of approximately $7.1 million.

        In the ordinary course of operating our hotel-casinos, it is necessary to upgrade or replace fixtures and equipment and to make improvements that will extend the life of our physical plants. We anticipate that these maintenance capital expenditures will total approximately $26.0 million in 2003.

        A key element of our business strategy is the expansion or renovation of our existing properties as described above. The completion of these projects is subject to certain risks, including but not limited to:

Other Matters

        In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 143 (“SFAS 143”), “Accounting for Obligations Associated with the Retirement of Long-Lived Assets”. The objectives of SFAS 143 are to establish accounting standards for the recognition and measurement of an asset retirement obligation and its associated asset retirement cost. SFAS 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002.

        In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 145 (“SFAS 145”) “Rescission of FASB Statements Nos. 4, 44 and 64 and Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13.” SFAS 145 addresses the presentation for losses on early retirements of debt in the statement of operations. Upon adoption of SFAS 145, we might not be allowed to present losses on early retirements of debt as an extraordinary item. Additionally, prior period extraordinary losses may be required to be reclassified to conform to this new presentation.

23

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Other Matters (continued)

        In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 146 (“SFAS 146”) “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” The provisions of SFAS 146 become effective for exit or disposal activities commenced subsequent to December 31, 2002.

        We do not expect that the adoptions of SFAS 143, 145, and 146 will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 148 (“SFAS 148”) “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” The provisions of SFAS 148 became effective December 15, 2002. We adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 148, and there was no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies (for guarantees issued after January 1, 2003) that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantee. At December 31, 2002, we do not have any outstanding guarantees and accordingly do not expect the adoption of FIN 45 to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

        In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” This interpretation addresses the requirements for business enterprises to consolidate related entities in which they are determined to be the primary economic beneficiary as a result of their variable economic interests. The interpretation is intended to provide guidance in judging multiple economic interests in an entity and in determining the primary beneficiary. The interpretation outlines disclosure requirements for VIEs created after January 31, 2003. We have reviewed our major relationships and our overall economic interests with other companies consisting of related parties, companies in which we have an equity position, and other suppliers to determine the extent of our variable economic interest in these parties. We believe we have appropriately reported the economic impact and our share of risks of our commercial relationships.

Impact of Inflation and Other Economic Factors

        Absent changes in competitive and economic conditions or in specific prices affecting the industry, we do not expect that inflation will have a significant impact on our operations. Changes in specific prices, such as fuel and transportation prices, relative to the general rate of inflation may have a material adverse effect on the hotel and casino industry. We depend upon Las Vegas and Southern California for a majority of our customers. Any economic downturn in those areas could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations and our ability to pay interest and principal on our debt.

24

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations(continued)

Regulation and Taxes

        We are subject to extensive regulation by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. Changes in applicable laws or regulations could have a significant impact on our operations.

        The gaming industry represents a significant source of tax revenues, particularly to the State of Nevada and its counties and municipalities. From time to time, various state and federal legislators and officials have proposed changes in tax law, or in the administration of such law, affecting the gaming industry. Proposals in recent years that have not been enacted included a federal gaming tax and increases in state or local taxes.

        We believe that our recorded tax balances are adequate. However, it is not possible to determine with certainty the likelihood of possible changes in tax law or in the administration of such law. Such changes, if adopted, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market Risk

        Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our long-term debt. We attempt to limit our exposure to interest rate risk by managing the mix of our long-term fixed-rate borrowings and short-term borrowings under our revolving bank credit facility. Assuming that the amount of our variable rate debt remained constant at $136.0 million during the next twelve months, a hypothetical 1% increase in our variable interest rate would increase our interest expense by $1.4 million. On April 2, 2002, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a member of our bank group wherein $100.0 million notional amount of our fixed rate debt was converted to a floating rate. In July 2002 we terminated the swap agreement. (See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation — Liquidity and Capital Resources”.) As of December 31, 2002, we did not have any investments in derivative- or foreign currency-based financial instruments.

25

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk (continued)

Market Risk (continued)

        The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by contractual maturity dates for the twelve-month period ended December 31,:

See also “Item 7 –Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations –Liquidity and Capital Resources” and see “Item 15 — Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K – Financial Statements Index — Notes to Financial Statements — Note 6 — Long-Term Debt”.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

        The report of independent accountants, financial statements and financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index are filed as part of this report. See “Item 15 – Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K — Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules, and Exhibits”.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

         None.

26

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

        The following table sets forth the names and ages of the directors and executive officers of Coast Hotels and their respective positions as of December 31, 2002.

        Michael J. Gaughan. Mr. Gaughan has been a director of Coast Hotels since its formation in September 1995 and is the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Coast Hotels. His current term as a director expires in 2003. He is also a director and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Coast Casinos, Inc. Mr. Gaughan was a general partner of the Barbary Coast Partnership from its inception in 1979 until January 1, 1996, the effective date of the reorganization in which the Barbary Coast Partnership and the Gold Coast Partnership consolidated with Coast Casinos and Coast Hotels (the “Reorganization”). Mr. Gaughan served as the managing general partner of the Gold Coast Partnership from its inception in December 1986 until the effective date of the Reorganization. Mr. Gaughan and Mr. Herbst were the sole stockholders of Gaughan-Herbst, Inc., which was the sole corporate general partner of the Gold Coast Partnership prior to the Reorganization. Mr. Gaughan has been involved in the gaming industry since 1960 and has been licensed as a casino operator since 1967.

27

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant (continued)

        Harlan D. Braaten. Mr. Braaten joined Coast Hotels as the President, Chief Financial Officer and a director in October 1995, and was appointed Chief Operating Officer in February 1996. His current term as a director expires in 2003. Mr. Braaten is also the President and Chief Operating Officer of Coast Casinos. Prior to joining Coast Hotels, Mr. Braaten was employed in various capacities, including the general manager and, most recently, senior vice president, treasurer and chief financial officer of Rio Hotel and Casino, Inc. in Las Vegas. From March 1989 to February 1991, Mr. Braaten was vice president, finance of MGM/Marina Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. Prior thereto, from November 1983 to March 1989, Mr. Braaten was property controller for Harrah’s in Reno, Nevada. Mr. Braaten has over 24 years of experience in the Nevada gaming industry.

        Jerry Herbst. Mr. Herbst has been a director, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Coast Hotels since its formation in September 1995. His current term as a director expires in 2003. Mr. Herbst has been the president of Terrible Herbst Oil Company, an owner and operator of gas stations and car washes, since 1959. Mr. Herbst and Mr. Gaughan were the sole stockholders of Gaughan-Herbst, Inc., which was the sole corporate general partner of the Gold Coast Partnership prior to the formation of Coast Hotels. Mr. Herbst has served as a member of the board of directors of Nevada Power Company since 1990 and of Edelbrock Corporation since 1994.

        J.  Tito Tiberti. Mr. Tiberti has been a director and Secretary of Coast Hotels since its formation in September 1995. His current term as a director expires in 2003. He is also a director and Secretary of Coast Casinos. Mr. Tiberti is the president, a director and a stockholder of, and together with his immediate family, controls Tiberti Construction, a construction company that served as the general contractor for the construction of The Orleans, the Gold Coast and the Suncoast. He has also served as managing general partner of The Tiberti Company, a real estate rental and development company, since 1971. The Tiberti Company is the lessor of the real property site for The Orleans. Mr. Tiberti has been involved in the gaming industry for 24 years and was a general partner of the Barbary Coast Partnership prior to the formation of Coast Hotels.

        Gage Parrish. Mr. Parrish was named Vice President, Finance, Assistant Secretary and a director of Coast Hotels in October 1995 and was promoted to Chief Financial Officer in February 1996. His current term as a director expires in 2003. Since 1986, he had been the Controller and Chief Financial Officer of the Gold Coast Partnership prior to the formation of Coast Hotels. From 1981 to 1986, Mr. Parrish served as Assistant Controller of the Barbary Coast Partnership. Mr. Parrish is a certified public accountant and has approximately 24 years of experience in the gaming industry.

        Franklin Toti. Mr. Toti has been a director of Coast Hotels since October 5, 1998. His current term expires in 2003. He has been Vice President of Casino Operations for Coast Hotels since January 1, 1996. Mr. Toti was a general partner and Casino Manager of the Barbary Coast Partnership from its inception in 1979 until January 1, 1996, the effective date of the Reorganization. Mr. Toti has 42 years of experience in the gaming industry.

        F. Michael Corrigan. Mr. Corrigan was elected as a director of Coast Hotels effective as of March 1, 1996. His current term as a director expires in 2003. Since July 1989, Mr. Corrigan has served as the chief executive officer of Corrigan Investments, Inc., which owns and manages real estate in Nevada and Arizona. In addition, Mr. Corrigan is the Chief Executive Officer of Corstan, Inc., a mortgage banking company, and was previously the owner, President and Chief Operating Officer of Stanwell Mortgage, a Las Vegas mortgage company.

28

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant (continued)

        Charles Silverman. Mr. Silverman was elected as a director of Coast Hotels effective as of March 1, 1996. His current term as a director expires in 2003. Mr. Silverman is the President and sole stockholder of Yates-Silverman, Inc., which specializes in developing theme-oriented interiors and exteriors and is a leading designer of hotels and casinos. Completed projects of Yates-Silverman, Inc. include New York-New York, Excalibur, Circus Circus, Luxor, the Trump Taj Mahal, Trump Castle and Atlantic City Showboat. Yates-Silverman, Inc. also served as the primary designer for The Orleans and the Suncoast. Mr. Silverman has served as the president of Yates-Silverman, Inc. since its inception in 1971.

        Joseph A. Blasco. Mr. Blasco was elected as a director of Coast Hotels effective as of December 16, 1996. His current term as a director expires in 2003. Since 1984, Mr. Blasco has been a partner in the real estate development partnership that developed the Spanish Trail community in Las Vegas, a project that includes over 1,200 homes, a 27-hole golf course and a country club. Mr. Blasco is currently the managing General Partner of United Realty Investments, a real estate development and management company in Las Vegas. He is also general partner in two real estate development partnerships, Summer Trail LLC and Trop-Edmond Ltd.

        Thomas V. Girardi. Mr. Girardi was elected as a director of Coast Hotels effective as of August 12, 2002. His current term as a director expires in 2003. A member of the American Bar Association, Mr. Girardi is a partner in the Los Angeles law firm, Girardi and Keese. Mr. Girardi sits on the board of directors of the International Academy of Trial Lawyers and is a past president of the American Board of Trial Advocates.

        Peter M. Thomas. Mr. Thomas was elected as a director of Coast Hotels effective as of August 12, 2002. His current term as a director expires in 2003. Mr. Thomas previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Bank of America, Nevada and, prior to the acquisition of Valley Capital Corporation by Bank of America, the President and Chief Operating Officer of Valley Bank of Nevada. Mr. Thomas is Chairman of the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Committee on Fiscal Affairs, a member of Nevada Commission on Economic Development, a member of the UNLV Foundation Board of Trustees and an executive committee member of the Nevada Development Authority.

        Clyde T. Turner. Mr. Turner was elected as a director of Coast Hotels effective as of August 12, 2002. His current term as a director expires in 2003. Mr. Turner is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Turner Investments, Ltd. and a number of special purpose real estate development companies known as the Spectrum Companies. Mr. Turner is a former member of the Nevada Gaming Commission. His previous positions in the gaming industry include Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. (now Mandalay Bay Group), Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and member of the Board of Golden Nugget, Inc./Mirage Resorts, Inc., and a Director and Executive Committee member of the American Gaming Association.

        Directors of Coast Hotels who are also employees of Coast Hotels or Coast Casinos receive no compensation for service on the Board of Directors or its committees. All other directors receive an annual director’s fee of $24,000, payable quarterly in arrears, and a fee of $1,000 per committee meeting. Directors may also be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board of Director or committee meetings.

29

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant (continued)

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

        Rules adopted by the SEC under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) require the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of their ownership, and changes in ownership, of such securities with the SEC on SEC Forms 3, 4 or 5, as appropriate. Such persons are required by the SEC’s regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all forms they file pursuant to Section 16(a).

        Based solely upon a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company during its most recent fiscal year, and any written representations provided to it, the Company believes that, except as noted below, each of the officers, directors, and owners of more than 10% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Company are in compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year 2002.

         During the 2002 year, (i) Mr. Tiberti filed one Form 4 for a transaction that occurred in 2001; (ii) Mr. Gaughan filed a Form 4 for a transaction that occurred in 2001, and (iii) Mr. Herbst filed a Form 4 for a transaction that occurred in 1999. Mr. Tiberti also filed a Form 4 during the 2001 year for a transaction that occurred in 2000 and will file during the 2003 year two Forms 4 for transactions that occurred in 1996 and 1999. Each of Mr. Tiberti's Forms 4 have reported three transactions.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

        The following table sets forth all compensation earned by or paid by Coast Hotels during 2000, 2001 and 2002 to each executive officer (the “Named Executive Officers”) whose compensation exceeded $100,000 in all capacities in which they served.

_________________

30

Item 11. Executive Compensation (continued)

Stock Options

        Mr.  Braaten was granted options to purchase 30,415 shares of Coast Casinos, Inc. common stock for $100 per share. The options vested in one-third increments on January 1, 1999, January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2001 and expire on December 31, 2008.

        Mr.  Parrish was granted options to purchase 5,000 shares of Coast Casinos, Inc. common stock for $100 per share. The options vested in one-third increments on June 14, 1999, June 14, 2000 and June 14, 2001 and expire on June 13, 2009.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

        All of our outstanding capital stock is owned by our parent company, Coast Casinos, Inc.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

        We maintain numerous racetrack dissemination contracts with Las Vegas Dissemination Company, Inc. (“LVDC”). Michael J. Gaughan’s son, John Gaughan, is the president and sole stockholder of LVDC. LVDC has been granted a license by the Nevada Gaming Authorities to disseminate live racing for those events and tracks for which it enters contracts and has been granted the exclusive right to disseminate all pari-mutuel services and race wire services to Nevada casinos. Under these dissemination contracts, we pay to LVDC between 3% and 5% of the wagers we accept for races held at the racetracks covered by the respective contracts. We also pay to LVDC a monthly fee for race wire services. Additionally, we have an agreement with LVDC to rent software and monitors to enable race book patrons to access information from their seating area. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, we incurred expenses to LVDC of approximately $947,000. The terms on which the dissemination services are provided are regulated by the Nevada Gaming Authorities.

        J.A. Tiberti Construction Company (“Tiberti Construction”) served as the general contractor for the expansion of the Gold Coast and The Orleans and miscellaneous construction projects at the Suncoast. J. Tito Tiberti owns approximately 6.2% of the outstanding common stock of Coast Casinos, and is a director and Secretary of Coast Hotels and Coast Casinos. Mr. Tiberti is the president, a director and stockholder of, and together with his immediate family members, controls Tiberti Construction.

        For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, we incurred expenses to Tiberti Construction of approximately $120.8 million. At December 31, 2002, we had construction accounts payable to Tiberti Construction of approximately $12.1 million.

        In 1995, we entered into a long-term ground lease with the Tiberti Company, a Nevada general partnership, with respect to the real property on which The Orleans is located. Mr. Tiberti, a director of Coast Hotels and a director and stockholder of Coast Casinos, is the managing partner of the Tiberti Company. During the year ended December 31, 2002, we incurred rental expenses to the Tiberti Company of $4.5 million, of which $2.7 million was paid. Deferred rent payable to the Tiberti Company was $15.4 million as of December 31, 2002.

31

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions (continued)

        Until October 2002, Michael J. Gaughan and Franklin Toti (along with the Leo Lewis Trust) were owners of LGT Advertising, which served as our advertising agency. Effective November 1, 2002, we purchased the partnership interests of LGT Advertising from Messrs. Gaughan, Toti and the Leo Lewis Trust, for the sum of $1,000. Prior to the November 2002 acquisition, LGT Advertising provided advertising design services and purchases advertising for our casinos from third parties and passed any discounts directly through to us. LGT Advertising received no compensation or profit for such activities, and invoiced us for actual costs incurred. LGT Advertising used our facilities and employees in rendering its services, but did not pay any compensation to us for such use. Messrs. Gaughan and Toti received no compensation from LGT Advertising. Advertising expenses to LGT Advertising were approximately $5.9 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

        LGT Advertising provides advertising and design services to Casino Queen, Inc., which operates the Casino Queen riverboat casino and hotel facility in East St. Louis, Illinois. Michael Gaughan owns 15% and Frank Toti owns 5% percent of the shares of stock in Casino Queen, Inc. Mr. Gaughan also serves as a director for Casino Queen, Inc. LGT renders its services to Casino Queen, Inc. on the same terms as would be offered to an unaffiliated third party. In November and December 2002, we received $13,000 in payments from Casino Queen, Inc.

        We have purchased certain of our equipment for our operations from RJ & S Inc., a Nevada corporation (“RJS”) that is owned by Michael J. Gaughan’s father, Jackie Gaughan, and Steven Delmont, our manager of food operations. Pursuant to the terms of our agreement with RJS, RJS purchases certain restaurant equipment and supplies and invoices us only for the actual amounts billed to RJS, plus applicable sales tax. Provisions of the agreement prohibit RJS employees, officers and shareholders from receiving any discounts, rebates, payments or gifts with respect to the equipment and supplies. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, we made purchases from RJS totaling approximately $2.2 million.

        Michael J. Gaughan is the majority partner of Nevada Wallboards, a Nevada general partnership (“Nevada Wallboards”), which prints wallboards and parlay cards for use in our race and sports books. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, we incurred expenses to Nevada Wallboards of approximately $272,000.

        Charles Silverman, a director of Coast Hotels and Coast Casinos, is the president of Yates-Silverman, Inc., which served as the designer of The Orleans, the Suncoast and various expansion projects at The Orleans, the Suncoast and the Gold Coast during 2001 and 2002. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 we incurred expenses to Yates-Silverman of $440,000.

        Coast Hotels promotes The Orleans by advertising on NASCAR vehicles operated by Orleans Motor Sports, Inc. In 2002, we entered into an agreement with Orleans Motor Sports, Inc. to place the logo of The Orleans on a truck racing in NASCAR’s Craftsman Truck Series, on transportation vehicles utilized by Orleans Motor Sports, Inc. and on any other vehicles raced by Orleans Motor Sports, Inc. in NASCAR races. Michael J. Gaughan is the sole owner of Orleans Motor Sports, Inc. Brendan Gaughan, the main driver employed by Orleans Motor Sports, Inc., is the son of Michael J. Gaughan. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 we paid $480,000 to Orleans Motor Sports, Inc. pursuant to a sponsorship agreement.

32

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions (continued)

        Michael J. Gaughan Jr., the son of Michael J. Gaughan, and David Ross, the general manager of the Suncoast, are owners of Coast Vacations, Inc., a travel agency operating under the name Las Vegas Vacations (“LVV”) that markets our hotel-casino properties to residents of Vancouver, Canada. We have agreed to pay LVV approximately $10,000 per month to promote our hotel-casinos subject to certain conditions designed to assure that LVV is utilizing such funds in a productive manner and for purposes that benefit our company. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, we paid $115,000, $91,000 and $120,000, respectively, to LVV.

        Michael J. Gaughan, Jr. is the general manager of the Barbary Coast. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, he received total salaries and bonuses in the amounts of $97,000, $135,000 and $162,000, respectively.

        We operate a satellite sports book at the Plaza Hotel and Casino (“Plaza”), a hotel-casino in Las Vegas that is primarily owned by Jackie Gaughan, Michael J. Gaughan’s father. We combine the sports book wagers generated at the Plaza with wagers accepted at our other sports books. The Plaza is allocated a pro-rata share of the net sports book winnings or losses, based on the percentage of wagers placed at the Plaza compared to the combined wagers placed at all our sports books. Such winnings or losses are netted against the direct and indirect costs of operating the sports book at the Plaza including, but not limited to, labor costs, advertising costs, printing costs and state and federal taxes. The Plaza keeps its winnings and reimburses us for the above noted costs. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, we received $311,000, $557,000 and $979,000, respectively, in reimbursements from the Plaza.

Item 14. Controls and Procedures

        We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management necessarily applied its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management’s control objectives.

        Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14(c). Based upon the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors, which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date we carried out our evaluation. Additionally, no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in such internal controls requiring corrective actions were identified.

33

PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)     Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits

34

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K (continued)

Exhibit Index

35

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K (continued)

Exhibit Index (continued)

36

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K (continued)

Exhibit Index (continued)

37

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Annual Report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Las Vegas, State of Nevada, on March 31, 2003.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

38

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Gaughan, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

39

CERTIFICATION

I, Gage Parrish, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

40

Index to Financial Statements

COAST HOTELS AND CASINOS, INC.

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Directors and Stockholder of Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc.

In our opinion, the accompanying balance sheets and the related statements of operations, stockholder’s equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Coast Hotels and Casinos, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of Coast Casinos, Inc.) (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2001 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada

F-2

COAST HOTELS AND CASINOS, INC.
(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Coast Casinos, Inc.)
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2001 and 2002 (dollars in thousands, except share data)

_________________

        The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

COAST HOTELS AND CASINOS, INC.
(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Coast Casinos, Inc.)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 (dollars in thousands, except share data)

_________________

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

COAST HOTELS AND CASINOS, INC.
(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Coast Casinos, Inc.)
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 (dollars in thousands, except share data)

_________________

        The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

COAST HOTELS AND CASINOS, INC.
(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Coast Casinos, Inc.)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002
(dollars in thousands, except share data)