Back to GetFilings.com

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File No. 0-20292

Ampex Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

1228 Douglas Avenue

Redwood City, California 94063-3199

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(650) 367-2011

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements, for the past 90 days. Yes    x    No    ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes    ¨    No    x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of February 28, 2003 was approximately $5,860,626.53 based on a price of $0.11 per share, which was the closing price of the Registrant’s Class A Common Stock on the American Stock Exchange on that date. The Class A Common Stock is the only class of common stock outstanding.

As of February 28, 2003 there were 63,412,196 outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock and no outstanding shares of Class C Common Stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12 and 13) of this Form 10-K.

AMPEX CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

Year Ended December 31, 2002

INDEX

i

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS

Introduction

Ampex Corporation (“Ampex”) is a leading innovator of visual information technology. During our 58-year history, we have developed substantial proprietary technology relating to the electronic storage, processing and retrieval of data, particularly images. We currently hold approximately 700 patents and patent applications covering digital image-processing, data compression and recording technologies. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ampex Data Systems Corporation (“Data Systems”), we incorporate this technology in the design and manufacture of very high performance tape-based storage products, principally for digital recording, archiving and rapid restore/backup applications. We also leverage our investment in technology through our corporate licensing division that licenses our patents to manufacturers of consumer electronics products.

We incorporated in Delaware in January 1992 as the successor to a business originally organized in 1944. References to “Ampex” include subsidiaries and predecessors of Ampex Corporation, unless the context indicates otherwise. Our principal executive offices are located at 1228 Douglas Avenue, Redwood City, California 94063, and our telephone number is (650) 367-2011. Our Class A Common Stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “AXC”. We also maintain a website on the Internet at www.ampex.com.

Where You Can Find More Information

You are advised to read this Form 10-K in conjunction with other reports and documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. In particular, please read our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and any Current Reports on Form 8-K that we may file from time to time. You may obtain copies of these reports directly from us or from the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and you may obtain information about obtaining access to the Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains information for electronic filers (including us) at its website www.sec.gov. We make available free of charge on or through our Internet website located at www.ampex.com our SEC filings on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K and any amendments to those filings as soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing with the SEC.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-K contains predictions, projections and other statements about the future that are intended to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others, those described under “Risk Factors, “ below. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report. We disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate updates or revisions of any expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. IN ASSESSING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 10-K, READERS ARE URGED TO READ CAREFULLY ALL SUCH CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS.

Risk Factors

We Have Experienced Significant Losses and Our Losses May Continue

We have incurred significant net losses in prior periods. These losses were primarily attributable to our former Internet video programming business, which we discontinued in 2001, and to our former disk storage

1

business, which we discontinued in 2000. Ampex no longer operates either of these businesses and we have provided reserves for all known costs of closure.

Our continuing operations include the results of our manufacturing subsidiary, Data Systems, and of our corporate patent licensing division. In 2002, total operating costs slightly exceeded revenues of these businesses and we lost money after interest expense was deducted. Although we have restructured much of our senior debt whereby the amount of interest that we need to pay in cash through 2004 is limited to Available Cash Flow, as defined, we continue to incur substantial interest expense on our indebtedness and this interest is added to the outstanding debt balance and will be repayable in the future.

We restructured the operations of Data Systems in 2001 and 2002. Data Systems reported a profit from operations and a net profit in 2002. It will remain profitable in future periods only if sales levels do not fall significantly from current levels. In addition, revenues from our licensing operations in 2002 declined significantly from prior years and unless we are successful in negotiating new licenses of our patents for use in products such as digital camcorders, digital cameras, DVDs and other consumer products not previously licensed by us, our licensing income may decline further in future periods. We can not predict when, if ever, we will be successful in negotiating new licensing agreements. Licensing negotiations can take up to several years to conclude and even if we are successful, there can be no assurance that licensing revenues will attain levels comparable to prior years.

Accordingly, there is a material risk that we will continue to incur operating and net losses in future periods. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” below and the other Risk Factors included in this section.

Risks of Limited Liquidity

We have limited liquidity with which to conduct our operations. Our cash and marketable securities totaled $9.1 million at December 31, 2002.

To deal with our limited liquidity, we restructured and extended the maturity dates of our long-term senior debt, discontinued certain unprofitable Internet video operations, and borrowed funds from a former affiliate to make required contributions to our employee retirement plan which is substantially underfunded. We also significantly restructured and down-sized the operations of Data Systems. Our Management currently believes that these actions, coupled with anticipated royalty income under licensing agreements presently in effect, should be sufficient to satisfy our projected cash obligations through 2003, but there can be no assurance in this regard.

In 1995, the State of California assessed income tax in the amount of $0.5 million for the period 1983 to 1985, while Ampex was a subsidiary of The Signal Companies (currently Honeywell International Inc.). We have requested the Franchise Tax Board to supply us with information in support of the outstanding assessments which, with interest and penalties, totaled approximately $2.8 million at December 31, 2002. We have petitioned the State Board of Equalization and appealed these assessments. Adverse determination of this appeal could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.

Our subsidiary, Ampex Finance Corporation (“AFC”), had a working capital facility that expired in May 2002 and the Company has provided cash collateral against the outstanding letters of credit that total $1.1 million at December 31, 2002. We are seeking to obtain a new accounts receivable based line of credit that would improve Data Systems’ financial flexibility. However, no commitment has been received to date.

We Have Significant Indebtedness, Which May Affect Our Financial Condition

As of December 31, 2002 we had outstanding approximately $68.7 million of total borrowings, which includes approximately $54.2 million under our 12% Senior Notes due 2008, $10.7 million under our Senior

2

Discount Notes due 2005 and $3.6 million of Hillside Notes. Such indebtedness is secured by liens on a substantial portion of our assets. We may incur additional indebtedness from time to time in the future, subject to certain restrictions imposed by our debt agreements. Substantial pension contributions are projected to be required beginning in 2004. It is anticipated that such contributions will be funded by Hillside. In that event we would issue additional notes to Hillside in an equivalent amount, which will correspondingly increase the amounts of our outstanding debt.

The Senior Notes require that we generate a minimum of $25 million of Available Cash Flow (as defined) during the three-year period ending December 31, 2004. Through December 31, 2002, we have generated $1 million of Available Cash Flow. To meet this requirement, we will be required to increase our revenues from licensing operations substantially above current levels. If we fail to generate the required revenues or if we default in our other obligations under the relevant loan agreements, the Noteholders would have the right to accelerate the indebtedness and foreclose on their liens, which would materially and adversely affect our financial condition.

The degree to which we are leveraged could have other important consequences to investors, including the following:

We expect that our cash balances and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund anticipated operating expenses, capital expenditures and our debt service requirements as they become due, at least through the end of fiscal 2003. However, we cannot assure you that the amounts available from these sources will be sufficient for such purposes in future periods. Also, we cannot assure you that additional sources of funding will be available if we need them or, if available, will be on satisfactory terms. If we cannot service our indebtedness, we will be forced to adopt alternative strategies. These strategies may include reducing or delaying capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our indebtedness, or seeking additional equity capital. We cannot give any assurance that any of these strategies will be successful or that they will be permitted under our debt indentures.

3

Risks Associated with a Decline in U.S. Government Spending

Data Systems’ business depends materially on continued U.S. government expenditures on intelligence and defense programs. The loss or significant decline in spending on various imaging and intelligence gathering programs where we are subcontractors to prime government contractors could materially adversely affect our business. U.S. intelligence and defense budgets have experienced declines from time to time in recent years, resulting in program delays, program cancellations and deferral of funding for approved programs. Although several intelligence programs have received government funding which has led to increased sales by Data Systems, we can not be assured that sales of new systems will continue at these levels. If sales of new systems decline in the future, we may be increasingly dependent upon revenues from the sale of spare parts, service and tape.

Our Royalty Income is Subject to Material Fluctuations

Our results of operations in certain prior periods have benefited from significant royalty income. We have received a substantial portion of that royalty income from negotiated settlements with manufacturers who had sold products incorporating our patents before entering into license agreements with us. Although we have a substantial number of outstanding and pending patents, and our patents have generated substantial royalties in the past, we cannot predict the amount of royalty income that we will receive in the future.

Royalty income has historically fluctuated widely due to a number of factors that we cannot predict, such as the extent to which third parties use our patented technology, the extent to which we must pursue litigation in order to enforce our patents, and the ultimate success of our licensing and litigation activities. Our royalty income fluctuates significantly from quarter to quarter and from year to year, and we cannot give any assurance as to the level of royalty income that will be realized in future periods.

The costs of patent litigation can be material. If we begin patent enforcement litigation against third parties, we may be subject to an increased risk of counterclaims alleging infringement by us of patents held by others or seeking to invalidate patents held by us. Moreover, we cannot assure you that we will be able to develop patentable technology that will generate significant patent royalties in future years to replace patents as they expire. Our expenditures for research and development have been declining in recent years which is likely to have a long-term adverse effect on our ability to maintain a significant portfolio of patented technologies.

Risks Associated with Acquisition Strategy

We are not currently seeking to make any acquisitions of new businesses. At present, the terms of our principal debt instruments substantially restrict our ability to make acquisitions or investments in new businesses. However, we have made, and may under certain circumstances in the future make, acquisitions of, and/or investments in, other businesses. These entities may be involved in new businesses in which Ampex has not historically been involved. We may not be able to identify or acquire additional acquisition candidates in the future, or complete any further acquisitions or investments on satisfactory terms.

Acquisitions and investments involve numerous additional risks, including difficulties in the management of operations, services and personnel of the acquired companies, and of integrating acquired companies with Ampex and/or each other’s operations. We may also encounter problems in entering markets and businesses in which we have limited or no experience. Acquisitions can also divert Management’s attention from other business concerns. We have made and may make additional investments in companies in which we own less than a 100% interest. Such investments involve additional risks, including the risk that we may not be in a position to control the management or policies of such entities, and the risk of potential conflicts with other investors.

Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any acquisitions or investments that we have made, or may make in the future, will result in any return, or as to the timing of any return. All of our acquisitions of Internet

4

companies have been written off during 2000 and 2001. In addition, we elected to discontinue the operations of MicroNet, which we acquired in 1998. It is possible that we could lose all or a substantial portion of any future investments.

Our Operating Results are Subject to Quarterly Fluctuations

Our sales and results of operations are generally subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations. Various factors affect our operating results, some of which are not within our control, including:

Results of a given quarter or year may not necessarily be indicative of results to be expected for future periods. In addition, fluctuations in operating results may negatively affect our debt service coverage, or our ability to issue debt or equity securities should we wish to do so, in any given fiscal period. Material fluctuations in our operating results in future periods could have a material adverse effect on the price of the Class A Common Stock.

Seasonal Customer Ordering Patterns May Affect Our Business

Sales of most of our products have historically declined during the first and third quarters of our fiscal year, due to the seasonal procurement practices of our customers. A substantial portion of our backlog at a given time is normally shipped within one or two quarters thereafter. Therefore, sales in any quarter are heavily dependent on orders received in that quarter and the immediately preceding quarter.

We May be Unable to Respond to Rapid Technological Change and the Need to Develop New Products

All the industries and markets from which we derive or expect to derive revenues, directly or through our licensing program, are characterized by continual technological change and the need to introduce new products, product upgrades and patentable technology. This has required, and will continue to require, that we spend substantial amounts for the research, development and engineering of new products and advances to existing products. We cannot assure you that our existing products, technologies and services will not become obsolete or that any new products, technologies or services will win commercial acceptance. Obsolescence of existing product lines, or inability to develop and introduce new products and services, could have a material adverse effect on our sales and results of operations in the future. The development and introduction of new technologies, products and services are subject to inherent technical and market risks, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in this regard. Our expenditures for research and development have been declining in recent years, which is likely to have a long-term adverse effect on our ability to maintain a significant portfolio of patented technologies. In addition, further reductions in our research and development programs could adversely affect our ability to remain competitive.

We Encounter Significant Competition in All of Our Businesses

Data Systems encounters significant competition in all the markets for its products and services. Many of its competitors have greater resources and access to capital than the Company. In the mass data storage market, Data

5

Systems competes with a number of well-established competitors such as IBM Corporation, Storage Technology Corporation, Sony Corporation and ADIC, as well as smaller companies. In addition, other manufacturers of scanning video recorders may seek to enter the mass data storage market in competition with us. In addition, price declines in competitive storage systems, such as magnetic or optical disk drives, can negatively impact sales of Data Systems’ DST products.

In the instrumentation market, Data Systems competes primarily with companies that depend on government contracts for a major portion of their sales in this market, including Calculex, L-3 Communications Corporation and Sypris Solutions, Inc. The number of competitors in this market has decreased in recent years as the level of government spending in many areas has declined.

We Are Dependent On Certain Suppliers

Data Systems purchases certain components from a single domestic or foreign manufacturer. Significant delays in deliveries or defects in such components could adversely affect our manufacturing operations, pending qualification of an alternative supplier. In addition, we produce highly engineered products in relatively small quantities. As a result, our ability to cause suppliers to continue production of certain products on which we may depend may be limited. We do not generally enter into long-term raw materials or components supply contracts.

We Are Subject to Certain Risks Related to Our International Operations

Although we significantly curtailed Data Systems’ international operations in prior years, sales to foreign customers (including U.S. export sales) continue to be significant to our results of operations. International operations are subject to a number of special risks, including limitations on repatriation of earnings, restrictive actions by local governments, and fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and nationalization. Additionally, export sales are subject to export regulation and restrictions imposed by U.S. government agencies. Fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies can affect our results of operations. We do not normally seek to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations by hedging our foreign currency positions.

Our Stock Price May Be Subject to Continued Volatility and Our Stock May Be Delisted from the American Stock Exchange

The trading price of our Common Stock has been and can be expected to be subject to significant volatility, reflecting a variety of factors, including:

The stock market in general, and technology companies in particular, have experienced a high degree of price volatility, which has had a substantial effect on the market prices of many such companies for reasons that often are unrelated or disproportionate to operating performance. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the Class A Common Stock, regardless of Ampex’s operating performance.

6

The American Stock Exchange has provided an extension to us to bring the Company into compliance with the Amex listing standards by June 30, 2003. It does not appear likely that we will attain compliance with the Amex’s continued listing requirements by June 30, 2003. However, it may initiate delisting proceedings at any time notwithstanding the extension they provided to us. If our shares are delisted, the market for our Common Stock may be adversely affected. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

We Are Dependent on Certain Key Personnel

We are highly dependent on our Management. Our success depends upon the availability and performance of our executive officers and directors. We have not entered into employment agreements with any of our key employees, and the loss of their services could have a material adverse effect on us. We do not maintain key man life insurance on any of these individuals.

Our Charter Documents and Certain of Our Governing Instruments May Prevent a Takeover

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides for a classified Board of Directors, with members of each class elected for a three-year term. It also provides for nullification of voting rights of certain foreign stockholders in certain circumstances involving possible violations of security regulations of the United States Department of Defense. The terms of our Preferred Stock require that we make mandatory offers to redeem those securities out of legally available funds in the event of a change of control. For this purpose, a change of control includes the following events: a person or group of people acting together acquires 30% or more of our voting securities; we merge, consolidate or transfer all or substantially all of our assets; or the dissolution of Ampex. The Certificate of Incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors to issue additional shares of Preferred Stock without the vote of stockholders.

The indenture governing our outstanding Senior Notes requires us to offer to repurchase the Senior Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the outstanding principal amount thereof together with accrued and unpaid interest in the event of a change of control. Under the indenture, a change of control includes the following events: a person or group of people acting together acquires 50% or more of our outstanding voting stock; or the transfer of substantially all of our assets to any such person or group, other than to certain of our subsidiaries and affiliates.

The Note Purchase Agreement governing our outstanding Senior Discount Notes requires us to repay such notes in full upon the occurrence of a change of control. Under the agreement, a change of control includes, among other things: any person or group becomes the beneficial owner of more than 50% of our outstanding voting stock, or any merger or consolidation of Ampex with or into any other entity. The agreement also requires us to repay the notes if we sell Data Systems or sell its Colorado Springs, CO manufacturing facility.

These provisions could have anti-takeover effects by making an acquisition of Ampex by a third party more difficult or expensive in certain circumstances.

We do Not Expect to Pay Dividends on our Common Stock

We have not declared dividends on our Common Stock since our incorporation in 1992 and we have no present intention of paying dividends on our Common Stock. We are also restricted by the terms of certain agreements and of our outstanding Preferred Stock as to the declaration of dividends.

We are Dependent on Licensed Patents and Proprietary Technology

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to establish and maintain the proprietary nature of our technology through the patent process. There can be no assurance that one or more of our patents will not be

7

successfully challenged, invalidated or circumvented or that we will otherwise be able to rely on such patents for any reason. In addition, our competitors, many of whom have substantial resources and have made substantial investments in competing technologies, may seek to apply for and obtain patents that restrict our ability to make, use and sell our products either in the United States or in foreign markets. If any of our patents are successfully challenged, invalidated or circumvented or our right or ability to manufacture our products becomes restricted, our ability to continue to manufacture and market our products could be adversely affected, which would likely have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Litigation may be necessary to enforce our patents, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by us or to determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others. Any litigation or interference proceedings brought against, initiated by or otherwise involving us may require us to incur substantial legal and other fees and expenses and may require some of our employees to devote all or a substantial portion of their time to the prosecution or defense of such litigation or proceedings.

We Are Subject to Environmental Regulation and our Business Could be Negatively Affected by the Costs of Compliance

Our facilities are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect the environment from waste emissions and hazardous substances. Owners and occupiers of sites containing hazardous substances, as well as generators and transporters of hazardous substances, are subject to broad liability under various federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including liability for investigative and cleanup costs and damages arising out of past disposal activities. We have been named from time to time as a potentially responsible party by the United States Environmental Protection Agency with respect to contaminated sites that have been designated as “Superfund” sites, and are currently engaged in various environmental investigation, remediation and/or monitoring activities at several sites located off Company facilities. There can be no assurance we will not ultimately incur a liability in excess of amounts currently reserved for pending environmental matters, or that additional liabilities with respect to environmental matters will not be asserted. In addition, changes in environmental regulations could impose the need for additional capital equipment or other requirements. Such liabilities or regulations could have a material adverse effect on us in the future.

Products

All of our products are manufactured by Data Systems and are comprised of very high performance tape-based mass data storage and instrumentation products. Our mass data storage products consist of DST and DIS series 19-millimeter scanning recorders and robotic library systems, and related tape and after-market parts. Our data acquisition and instrumentation products consist of DCRsi digital instrumentation recorders and related tape and after-market parts. Data Systems also continues to offer spare parts to repair professional video recorders and other products that it previously manufactured and marketed to the television production and post-production industries. Sales of spare parts of legacy television products accounted for 3.7% of sales for the year ended December 31, 2002, 5.6% of sales for the year ended December 31, 2001 and 6.2% of sales for the year ended December 31, 2000. For information concerning net sales for each product group comprising in excess of 10% of net sales and other information relating to our operating segments, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

19-millimeter Products.    In 1992, we entered the high-performance mass data storage market with our DST series of 19-millimeter data storage products, including tape drives and robotic library systems. With the 2000 introduction of our “Quad Density” product line, the DST series is in its third generation. Based on our own evaluation and that of outside sources, we believe that our DST and DIS mass data storage products offer a price/performance advantage over alternative magnetic, optical, solid-state or disk-based storage systems now available, providing fast data access times, rapid data transfer rates and low cost per megabyte of storage.

Access time is one of the most important sustainable advantages of DST products compared to alternative tape-based storage systems. Other tape-based storage products achieve low-cost storage but trade off

8

accessibility; since the data stored is not available for most online or near-online applications, such systems are generally limited to backup and archival storage applications. DST products, in contrast, combine low storage cost per megabyte with fast access to rapidly transferable information. DST products use software logic that enables a library or even a single tape drive to organize information using partitions, much as disk drives do. Individual segments can then be accessed quickly and updated independently. This proprietary technology, introduced in 1994, gives DST products the performance of a digital tape drive and the efficiency and access speed of partitioned memory. DST systems also provide rapid data transfer rates that exceed the speed of other mass storage products such as optical disks, allowing a user to download stored information to a computer at a sustained rate of 15 megabytes per second (“MB/sec”), with an option available to increase to a rate of 20MB/sec without utilizing compression.

DST and DIS tape drives use core technology developed by us for our digital video recorders. The drives use high-density metal particle tape cartridges, which are available in a range of sizes providing storage capacities from 100 to 660GB per cartridge in quad-density format. DST automated library systems incorporate multiple tape cartridges and tape drives and provide from 1.2 to 12.8 terabytes (“TB”) of storage capacity while occupying only a fraction of the floor space required by competing storage systems. As each of the three generations of the product line was introduced, we provided for the ability to upgrade to the new format. In early 2001, we began shipping expansion modules which expand DST library storage capacities up to approximately 100 terabytes.

Our quad-density DST product line currently includes the DST 314 tape drive, the DST 414 automated cartridge library, the DST 714, DST 814 and DST 914 automated library system. The DST 314 is a single cartridge tape drive that provides rapid backup/restore applications for large databases or disk arrays. The DST 314 is capable of accepting 100GB, 300GB and 660GB cartridges. The DST 414 automated cartridge library is an entry-level library with a storage capacity of up to 4.8TB in less than eight square feet of floor space. The DST 714 automated library is designed to combine one or two tape drives, and features a storage capacity of 12.8TB. This automated tape library product was designed to fill the gap between our DST 414 and DST 814 products. The DST 814 library system is designed to combine from one to four tape drives and is optimized for large file size applications and, accordingly, is suited for image-based document storage, medical records, news archives, oil and gas seismic data and CAD/CAM image data, as well as potential video-on-demand applications. We have also started delivering our DST 914 medium cartridge library in 2002, which gives a higher storage capacity per square ft. of floor space than our other models. These products can deliver a sustained rate of 15MB/sec across a SCSI-2 interface, search speeds of up to 1600MB/sec, average access time of less than 16 seconds and capacity of up to 660GB on a single cartridge. We also offer expansion modules for the DST 714 and DST 814 products, which permit additional storage capacity for those products.

Although we believe that our DST drives and library systems offer significant advantages over competitive systems, these products incorporate a proprietary magnetic tape format that is not compatible with current industry standard formats. We have not licensed our tape format to other manufacturers and, as such, it is the sole source of these products. In addition, other factors relating to the markets for these products and to competition in these markets may affect future sales of DST products. See “Markets—Mass Data Storage and Instrumentation Products,” “Markets—Distribution and Customers,” “Markets—Competition, “ and “—New Product Development and Industry Conditions.”

Our 19-millimeter tape-based instrumentation products currently are the DIS 124i and DIS 164i instrumentation/data recorders and the DIS 224i automated instrumentation/data library. Our DIS products are designed for mass storage of instrumentation data. These recorders use the same 19-mm helical scan recording technology used in our DST products. Data from DIS recorders can also be stored on DST cartridges, placed in DST libraries and accessed using DST tape drives, so that all the benefits of DST mass storage products are available, including rapid, random access to the data for subsequent processing. The DIS 124i and 164i drives have capacities of 100, 300 or 660GB (depending on the DST cartridge used) and record/reproduce rates of 120 megabits (“Mb”) and 160Mb per second, respectively.

9

Data Acquisition/Instrumentation Products.    We have been well established for a number of years as a supplier of instrumentation recorders. We have supplied these recorders primarily to government agencies for use in data collection, satellite surveillance and defense-related applications, as well as to defense contractors and aerospace and other industrial users primarily for test and measurement purposes. Our instrumentation recorders have been used on almost every advanced commercial and U.S. military aircraft, as well as on many foreign aircraft. We believe they are well suited to these demanding aeronautical application and other applications involving comparable data-gathering challenges in extreme environments, because of their performance and reliability.

Our principal data acquisition/instrumentation products currently are the DCRsi 240, DCRsi 120 and DCRsi 75 digital instrumentation recorders. The DCRsi recorders are rugged, highly-reliable and compact recorders that permit uninterrupted data capture over very long periods of time, such as during test flights of new aircraft. The DCRsi 240 instrumentation recorder has the capability of storing 48GB of data at a record/reproduce rate of up to 240 megabits (“Mb”) per second. The DCRsi 120 instrumentation recorder has a similar storage capacity and a record/reproduce rate of 120Mb per second. The DCRsi 75 recorder is our lowest cost DCRsi model with a record-reproduce rate of 75Mb per second.

In 2001, we developed the DDRs 400, a new generation of airborne instrumentation recorders utilizing hard disks rather than tape. The data and control interface is fully compatible with the DCRsi product line. The recorder is smaller, lighter, consumes less power, has a higher data rate and larger storage capacity than the previous generation of tape-based recorders. We initially shipped units to customers for evaluation and testing in 2001 and subsequently began shipping production units in 2002. In development is a solid state version of the DDRs 400, which will operate in harsh environment conditions.

A significant portion of data acquisition and instrumentation recorder sales reflect purchases by prime contractors to the federal government, which can be subject to significant fluctuations. See “Markets—Data Acquisition/Instrumentation Recorders.” In addition, other factors relating to the markets for our instrumentation products and to competition in these markets may affect future sales of these products. See “Distribution and Customers, Competition,” and “New Product Development and Industry Conditions.”

Data Systems’ other products are primarily television after-market products (including spare parts) relating to television products that we manufactured in prior periods and continue to support.

Markets for Data Systems Products

Digital Archives and Mass Storage Libraries.    Our 19-millimeter mass storage tape drives and library systems are optimized for applications that must handle large amounts of data, such as those that process and store images, digital video and streaming data. Our markets are presently:

10

We believe that the emergence of applications that transmit video, graphics and other images over the Internet or private networks may create new markets for our data storage products. Our Management realizes that these applications will require bandwidth improvements to current information delivery systems before the information storage systems offered by us and others will be required. As these technical obstacles are overcome and commercial markets ultimately develop, we believe that we will experience aggressive competition from other companies, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to remain competitive against products ultimately offered by such companies.

Data Acquisition/Instrumentation Recorders.    Data Systems’ DCRsi recording drives and magnetic media are designed to acquire large volumes of data in stressful physical environments, and are used extensively in airborne and naval intelligence acquisition and for the collection of test data during the design and qualification of aircraft. DCRsi products are used by U.S. and foreign military and intelligence agencies (including those of Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom), as well as by manufacturers of commercial airplanes, such as Boeing Corporation, and by Airbus, the consortium of European airframe manufacturers. A significant portion of DCRsi products are also sold in versions that are intended for use in ground facilities for the long-term storage or analysis of data previously collected in mobile environments.

The storage capacity and data transfer rates of our DCRsi products can be varied continuously from fractions of a megabit per second up to 240 megabits per second on its highest performance versions. These products perform in conditions of extreme shock and vibration, variations in gravitational force and temperature, humidity and electronic interference, such as those found in aircraft, helicopters and space vehicles. These products are designed for data interchange between locations and agencies. In ground-based applications, which generally are less harsh environments that do not require the ruggedness of a DCRsi recorder, the storage and analysis functions of DCRsi products can also be performed by our 19-millimeter DST and DIS mass data storage products.

The U.S and foreign government agencies continue to be the primary market for our DCRsi products. Sales to government agencies are subject to fluctuation as a result of changes in government spending programs (including defense programs) and could be adversely affected by pressure on government agencies to reduce spending. Any material decline in the current level of government purchases of our products could have a material adverse effect on us.

Distribution and Customers

We currently distribute our 19-millimeter products (including DST and DIS recorders) directly through our internal sales force, as well as through independent value-added resellers. Our DST products are sold to customers such as oil and gas companies, imaging companies, information and entertainment delivery companies, broadband telecommunications companies and government entities.

Our instrumentation recorders (including our DIS recorders) are sold primarily to prime contractors who in turn sell to government agencies involved in data collection, satellite surveillance and defense-related activities, as well as to defense contractors and other industrial users for testing and measurement purposes. Sales of instrumentation recorders are made through our internal domestic and international sales forces, as well as through independent sales organizations in foreign markets.

We currently operate a total of six sales offices, including four in the U.S., one in Japan and one in the United Kingdom.

Our sales to U.S. government agencies (either directly or indirectly through government contractors) represented approximately 63% of U.S. sales in fiscal 2002 compared to 52% in fiscal 2001 and 46% in fiscal 2000. Products sold for U.S. government use include primarily instrumentation recording systems. Sales to government customers are subject to customary contractual provisions permitting termination at the government’s election. See “Markets—Mass Data Storage and Instrumentation Products.”

11

In 2002, two customers, Lockheed Martin and ADIC, each individually accounted for more than 10% of total revenue and collectively accounted for 28.0% of total revenue. In 2001, one customer accounted for 14.1% of total revenue. In 2000, there were no customers who accounted for more than 10% of the total revenue.

Research, Development and Engineering

Scanning recording systems such as those developed by us involve extremely complex technology. As a result, we have developed extensive expertise in a wide area of technical disciplines and have developed fundamental innovations in digital image processing, magnetic recording technology and channel electronics. In 2002, we spent approximately 7.1% of total revenue for research and development programs and engineering costs, compared to 11.9% in 2001 and 11.5% in 2000. While the percentage of research, development and engineering expense to total revenues has remained relatively constant, the amount spent has declined substantially in response to lower sales levels. Future research, development and engineering spending may need to be reduced if Data Systems were to experience further declines in revenues. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. In prior years, we designed and manufactured a wide range of professional television products, and we patented many of our innovations. While we exited those markets several years ago, many patents covering innovations in the field remain in force. These technologies form the foundation of our digital patent portfolio that we are seeking to exploit with new licensing agreements covering digital cameras, DVDs and computer games. In recent years, with respect to current products, we have allocated a major portion of our research and development budget to the 19-millimeter digital recording technology including the introduction of double and then quad-density recorders and expansion modules for our DST and DIS products and to sustaining engineering on all of our product lines. We will continue our sustaining engineering processes and, with available funds, develop lower cost versions of our data acquisition and instrumentation products, such as the recently developed DDRs disk-based recorder, and to improve the ability of these products to interface with other companies’ products. See “Products—Mass Data Storage and Instrumentation” above. We will also continue researching other new product opportunities that capitalize on our expertise and patented technology in digital image processing, magnetic recording and channel electronics. All of our research, development and engineering efforts are subject to certain risks and uncertainties described below under “New Product Development and Industry Conditions,” and there can be no assurance that any of these efforts will be technologically or commercially successful.

Patents, Licenses and Trademarks

As a result of our ongoing research and development expenditures, we have developed substantial proprietary technology, certain of which we have elected to patent or to seek to patent. As of December 31, 2002, we held over 700 patents and patent applications, including approximately 300 patents in the U.S., approximately 400 corresponding patents in other countries, and approximately 80 U.S. and foreign patent applications pending. The majority of these patents and pending patents relate to our recording technology. We continually review our patent portfolio and allow non-strategic patents to lapse, thereby minimizing substantial renewal fees.

We have granted numerous royalty-bearing patent licenses to, and hold patent licenses from, third parties. Certain of our patented innovations have been adopted for use in mass market consumer products, and as a result, we receive the majority of our licensing royalties from foreign manufacturers of analog and digital video tape recorders. Several of our patents covering analog VCRs expire by 2003. Late in 2001, we entered into an agreement with a major Japanese manufacturer of digital camcorders to license our intellectual property which resulted in payments on prior period shipments of products amounting to $3 million. We have contacted other unlicensed manufacturers of digital camcorders and have initiated licensing discussions with them. There can be no assurance that such licensing efforts (including any necessary litigation) will be successful.

We also believe that we have patents that are used in the manufacture of digital still cameras, DVDs, video games and other consumer electronic products. We intend to offer licenses to major manufacturers of these

12

products. We will continue to evaluate additional products as potential licensing opportunities to the extent that our technical and financial resources permit. We have not granted any licenses under our scanning recorder patents specifically for data storage applications, but we may do so in the future if we determine that this would support our marketing strategy.

It is not possible to predict the amount of royalty income that will be received in the future. Royalty income has historically fluctuated widely due to a number of factors that we cannot predict, such as the extent of use of our patented technology by third parties, the extent to which we must pursue litigation in order to enforce our patents, and the ultimate success of our licensing and litigation activities. Moreover, there can be no assurance that we will continue to develop patentable technology that will generate significant patent royalties in future years.

U.S. patents are, at present, in force for a period of 20 years from the date of application and patents granted by foreign jurisdictions are generally in force for between 14 years to 20 years from the date of application. We have obtained our present patents over the course of the past 20 years and, accordingly, have patents in force that will expire from time to time over the next 20 years. Patents are important to our current overall business, both as a source of protection of the proprietary technology used in our current products, and as a source of royalty income. While results of operations would be adversely affected by the loss of patents that generate significant royalty income, Management believes that none of our current product lines is materially dependent upon a single patent or license or group of related patents or licenses, and that timely introduction of products incorporating new technologies or particularly suited to meet the needs of a specific market or customer group is a more important determinant of the success of our current business. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that we will continue to develop patentable technology that will be able to generate significant patent royalties in future years to replace patents as they expire. See “Research, Development and Engineering.”

In 2001, one licensee accounted for 10.7% of total revenue. There were no licensees who accounted for more than 10% of the total revenue in 2002 and 2000.

We regard our trademark “Ampex” and our logo as valuable to our businesses. We have registered our trademark and logo in the U.S. and a number of foreign countries. U.S. trademark registrations are generally valid for an initial term of 10 years and renewable for subsequent 10-year periods. We have not granted any material rights to use our name or logo to any other third party.

Our trademarks used in this report include Ampex, DCT, DST, DCRsi and DIS, all of which are trademarks of Ampex Corporation. All other trademarks and service marks used in this report are the property of Ampex or their respective owners.

Manufacturing

Our products are manufactured at our facilities in Redwood City, California and Colorado Springs, Colorado. Products are designed and engineered primarily in Redwood City. Because our mass data storage products incorporate many of the technologies and components of our 19-mm-based videotape recorders, the manufacturing process of the mass data storage products has benefited from the existing video recorder production facilities and techniques.

We believe that our Colorado Springs, CO manufacturing facility is larger than required or projected to be required to accommodate business growth in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, we are seeking a tenant to lease up to 150,000 square feet of presently underutilized space.

We maintain insurance, including business interruption insurance, that Management considers to be adequate and customary under the circumstances. However, there is no assurance that we will not incur losses beyond the limits of, or outside the coverage of, our current insurance.

13

Sources of Supply

We use a broad variety of raw materials and components in our manufacturing operations. While most materials are readily available from numerous sources, we purchase certain components, such as customized integrated circuits and flexible magnetic media, from a single domestic or foreign manufacturer. Significant delays in deliveries of, or defects in the supply of, such components could adversely affect our manufacturing operations pending qualification of an alternative supplier. In addition, we produce highly-engineered products in relatively small quantities. As a result, our ability to cause suppliers to continue production of certain products on which we may depend may be limited. We do not generally enter into long-term raw material supply contracts. In addition, many of the components of our products are designed, developed and manufactured by us, and thus are not readily available from alternative sources.

Fluctuations in Operating Results; Seasonality and Backlog

Our sales and results of operations are generally subject to quarterly and annual fluctuations. Factors affecting operating results include: customer ordering patterns; availability and market acceptance of new products; timing of significant orders and new product announcements; order cancellations; receipt of royalty income; and numerous other factors. Our revenues are typically dependent upon receipt of a limited number of customer orders involving relatively large dollar volumes in any given fiscal period, increasing the potential volatility of our sales revenues from quarter to quarter. In addition, sales to government customers (primarily sales of DCRsi instrumentation products) are subject to fluctuations as a result of changes in government spending programs, which can materially affect our gross margin as well as our sales. Sales of most of our products have historically declined during the first and third quarters of our fiscal year, due to seasonal procurement practices of our customers.

A substantial portion of our backlog at a given time is normally shipped within one or two quarters thereafter. Therefore, sales in any quarter are heavily dependent on orders received in that quarter and the immediately preceding quarter. Our backlog of firm orders at December 31, 2002 was $4.7 million, compared to $4.6 million at December 31, 2001 and $3.4 million at December 31, 2000. We do not generally include foreign orders in backlog until we have obtained requisite export licenses and other documentation. Orders may be subject to cancellation in the event shipments are delayed. For all of the foregoing reasons, results of a given quarter are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a fiscal year.

Competition

We encounter significant competition in all our product markets. Although our competitors vary from product to product, many are significantly larger companies with greater financial resources, broader product lines and other competitive advantages.

We compete in the mass data storage market with a number of well-established competitors, such as IBM Corporation, Storage Technology Corporation, Sony Corporation and ADIC as well as smaller companies. In addition, other manufacturers of scanning video recorders may seek to enter the mass data storage market in competition with us. In the mass data storage market, we believe that the principal competitive factors are product performance, cost of equipment and media, product reliability and availability of service and support. We believe our strongest competitive advantage is in the area of product performance. However, DST products are relatively expensive in comparison to other competitive products, and are generally cost effective only if the customer requires the high level of performance and storage capacity of DST products. While we are working to reduce the cost of its DST products, the prices of other storage systems, such as disk drives, are also declining. In addition, although DST products offer faster data access times than competing tape-based library systems, magnetic disks deliver faster data access than DST products. There can be no assurance that we can compete successfully on a long-term basis in the mass data storage market.

14

In the instrumentation market, we compete primarily with companies that depend on government contracts for a major portion of their sales in this market, including Sony Corporation, L-3 Communications Corporation, Calculex and Sypris Solutions, Inc. The number of competitors in this market has decreased in recent years as the level of government spending in many areas has declined. The principal competitive factors in this market are cost, product reliability, product performance and the ability to satisfy applicable government procurement requirements.

New Product Development and Industry Conditions

The data storage and instrumentation industries are characterized by continual technological change and the need to introduce new products and product upgrades. This requires a high level of expenditure for research and development. Obsolescence of existing product lines, or the inability to develop and introduce new products, could have a material adverse effect on sales and results of operations. Although we have completed development of our third-generation mass data storage drives and robotic library systems, we must continue to invest in research and development programs to improve these products and develop new products. Due to declining sales levels, over the past few years, we have been required to reduce amounts invested in research, development and engineering. If this trend continues, our ability to remain competitive will be affected. No assurance can be given that existing products will not become obsolete, that any new products will win commercial acceptance or that our new products or technology will be competitive. See “Competition.” Furthermore, the introduction of new products or technologies can be hampered by technical problems in design, manufacturing and test procedures or the occurrence of other unforeseen events.

Sales of our instrumentation products can be significantly affected by changes in government spending levels. See “Markets—Mass Data Storage and Instrumentation Products—Data Acquisition Instrumentation Recorders” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

International Operations

Substantially all of our licensing income is derived from foreign customers. Sales of products to foreign customers accounted for approximately 15.6% of net sales in fiscal 2002, compared to 19.6% in fiscal 2001 and 20.6% in 2000. Foreign marketing operations are conducted primarily through local distributors and agents, with support from our internal marketing and sales organization. See “Distribution and Customers.”

Foreign operations are subject to the usual risk attendant upon investments in foreign countries, including limitations on repatriation of earnings, restrictive actions by local governments, fluctuation in foreign currency exchange rates and nationalization. Additionally, export sales are subject to export regulations and restrictions imposed by the U.S. Department of State and the U.S. Department of Commerce.

In certain prior periods, declines in the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to certain foreign currencies have favorably affected our international operations, and in other periods the strength of the dollar relative to such currencies has adversely affected our operations. Fluctuations in the value of international currencies can be expected to continue to affect our operations in the future, although the impact will be less significant than it was in periods with a higher proportion of sales in foreign currencies. We currently do not hedge our assets that are denominated in foreign currencies. U.S. export sales are denominated in U.S. dollars.

See Note 21 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning our foreign operations.

Environmental Regulation and Proceedings

Our facilities are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect the environment from waste emissions and hazardous substances. We are also subject to the federal Occupational

15

Safety and Health Act and other laws and regulations affecting the safety and health of employees in its facilities. Management believes that we are generally in compliance in all material respects with all applicable environmental and occupational safety laws and regulations or have plans to bring operations into compliance. Management does not anticipate that capital expenditures for pollution control equipment for fiscal 2003 or 2004 will be material.

Owners and occupiers of sites containing hazardous substances, as well as generators and transporters of hazardous substances, are subject to broad liability under various federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including liability for investigative and cleanup costs and damages arising out of past disposal activities. We have been named as a potentially responsible party by the United States Environmental Protection Agency with respect to four contaminated sites that have been designated as “Superfund” sites on the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. We are engaged in six environmental investigation, remediation and/or monitoring activities at sites located off our facilities, including the removal of solvent contamination from subsurface aquifers at a site in Sunnyvale, California. Some of these activities involve the participation of state and local government agencies. The other five sites (including the four Superfund sites) are associated with the operations of the Media subsidiaries formerly owned by us. Although we sold Media in November 1995, we may have continuing liability with respect to environmental contamination at these sites if Media fails to discharge its responsibilities with respect to such sites. During 2002, we spent a total of approximately $0.1 million in connection with environmental investigation, remediation and monitoring activities and we expect to spend a similar amount in fiscal 2003 for such activities.

Because of the inherent uncertainty as to various aspects of environmental matters, including the extent of environmental damage, the most desirable remediation techniques and the time period during which cleanup costs may be incurred, it is not possible for us to estimate with any degree of certainty the ultimate costs that we may incur with respect to the currently pending environmental matters referred to above. Nevertheless, at December 31, 2002, we had an accrued liability of $0.9 million for pending environmental liabilities associated with the Sunnyvale site and certain other sites currently owned or leased by us. We have not accrued any liability for contingent liabilities we may incur with respect to the former Media sites discussed above. Based on facts currently known to Management, they believe it is only remotely likely that our liability in connection with such pending matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will be material to our financial condition or results of operations or material to investors.

While we believe that we are generally in compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations or have plans to bring operations into compliance, it is possible that we will be named as a potentially responsible party in the future with respect to additional Superfund or other sites. Furthermore, because we conduct our business in foreign countries as well as in the U.S., it is not possible to predict the effect that future domestic or foreign regulation could have on our business, operating results or cash flow. There can be no assurance that we will not ultimately incur liability in excess of amounts currently reserved for pending environmental matters, or that additional liabilities with respect to environmental matters will not be asserted. In addition, changes in environmental regulations could impose the need for additional capital equipment or other requirements. Such liabilities or regulations could have a material adverse effect on us in the future.

Employees

As of December 31, 2002, in our continuing operations we employed 145 people worldwide, compared to 156 at December 31, 2001 and 260 at December 31, 2000. Approximately 10% of our current worldwide workforce is employed in our international operations, compared to 12% at December 31, 2001 and 8% at December 31, 2000. No employees are covered by any collective bargaining agreement. We are dependent on the performance of certain key members of Management and key technical personnel. We have not entered into employment agreements with any such individuals. Edward J. Bramson, who has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 1991, is also engaged in the management of certain companies affiliated with Sherborne Holdings

16

Incorporated, a privately-owned Delaware holding company and a Company stockholder. Mr. Bramson currently devotes most of his time to the management of Ampex. The loss of the services of Mr. Bramson or other key individuals could have a material adverse effect on us.

As of December 31, 2000, in our discontinued operations we employed 75 people in our Internet affiliates and 53 people at MicroNet.

Pension Plan Matters

In 1994, Ampex, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the “PBGC”), certain affiliates, including Hillside Capital Incorporated (“Hillside”), who were members of a “group under common control” for purposes of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), entered into certain agreements in connection with the liquidation of our former parent, NH Holding Incorporated (“NHI”), relating to our pension plans and those of our former Media subsidiaries, which are substantially underfunded. See Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We are also contingently liable to fund the Media plan if Media fails to do so. Pursuant to these agreements, Hillside has advanced us $4.0 million for pension contributions that were scheduled in 2002 and 2001 that we were unable to make. We anticipate that due to our limited resources, Hillside will be required to fund future contributions and such amounts are projected to be significant. In this event, we will issue additional notes to Hillside. Under the terms of the notes, accrued interest is payable quarterly, a principal payment of $150,000 is due on the first anniversary of each note, with the remainder due on the fourth anniversary of the notes. During 2002, $450,000 was repaid on the Hillside Notes. We have granted Hillside a security interest in Data System’s inventory and other assets as collateral for advances which it is required to make pursuant to the agreement. The agreement contains certain restrictive covenants which, among other things, restrict our ability to declare dividends, sell all or substantially all our assets or commence liquidation, or engage in specified transactions with certain related parties, breach of which could result in acceleration of our potential termination liabilities. In 1994, we discontinued accrual of benefits under the pension plans, but have continued to fund our plan in accordance with ERISA.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2002, our principal properties were as follows:

In addition to the properties and leased facilities listed above, we lease office space and warehouse facilities from time to time at various domestic and foreign locations.

17

We believe that our current facilities, including machinery and equipment, are generally in good condition, well-maintained and suitable for their intended uses, and that our facilities have, and will continue to have, adequate capacity to accommodate our present needs and business growth for our present products in the foreseeable future.

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are a party to routine litigation incidental to our business. In the opinion of Management, no such current or pending lawsuits, either individually or in the aggregate, are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In 1995, the State of California assessed income tax in the amount of $0.5 million for the period 1983 to 1985, while we were a subsidiary of The Signal Companies (currently Honeywell International Inc.). We have requested the Franchise Tax Board to supply us with information in support of the outstanding assessments which, with interest and penalty, totaled approximately $2.8 million at December 31, 2002. We have petitioned the State Board of Equalization and intend to appeal these assessments. Adverse determination of this appeal could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.

Our facilities are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect the environment from waste emissions and hazardous substances. We are also subject to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act and other laws and regulations affecting the safety and health of employees in its facilities. Management believes that we are generally in compliance in all material respects with all applicable environmental and occupational safety laws and regulations or have plans to bring operations into compliance. Management does not anticipate that capital expenditures for pollution control equipment for fiscal 2003 or 2004 will be material.

Owners and occupiers of sites containing hazardous substances, as well as generators and transporters of hazardous substances, are subject to broad liability under various federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including liability for investigative and cleanup costs and damages arising out of past disposal activities. We have been named as a potentially responsible party by the United States Environmental Protection Agency with respect to four contaminated sites that have been designated as “Superfund” sites on the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980. We are engaged in six environmental investigation, remediation and/or monitoring activities at sites located off our facilities, including the removal of solvent contamination from subsurface aquifers at a site in Sunnyvale, California. Some of these activities involve the participation of state and local government agencies. The other five sites (including the four Superfund sites) are associated with the operations of the Media subsidiaries formerly owned by us. Although we sold Media in November 1995, we may have continuing liability with respect to environmental contamination at these sites if Media fails to discharge its responsibilities with respect to such sites. During 2002, we spent a total of approximately $0.1 million in connection with environmental investigation, remediation and monitoring activities and expect to spend a similar amount in fiscal 2003 for such activities.

Because of the inherent uncertainty as to various aspects of environmental matters, including the extent of environmental damage, the most desirable remediation techniques and the time period during which cleanup costs may be incurred, it is not possible for us to estimate with any degree of certainty the ultimate costs that we may incur with respect to the currently pending environmental matters referred to above. Nevertheless, at December 31, 2002, we had an accrued liability of $0.9 million for pending environmental liabilities associated with the Sunnyvale site and certain other sites currently owned or leased by us. We have not accrued any liability for contingent liabilities we may incur with respect to former Media sites discussed above. Based on facts currently known to Management, they believe it has no contingent liability in connection with such pending matters, either individually or in the aggregate, material to our financial condition or results of operations or material to investors.

18

While we believe that we are generally in compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations or have plans to bring operations into compliance, it is possible that we will be named as a potentially responsible party in the future with respect to additional Superfund or other sites. Furthermore, because we conduct our business in foreign countries as well as in the U.S., it is not possible to predict the effect that future domestic or foreign regulation could have on our business, operating results or cash flow. There can be no assurance that we will not ultimately incur liability in excess of amounts currently reserved for pending environmental matters, or that additional liabilities with respect to environmental matters will not be asserted. In addition, changes in environmental regulations could impose the need for additional capital equipment or other requirements. Such liabilities or regulations could have a material adverse effect on us in the future.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 4A.    EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Our executive officers and their ages as of February 1, 2003 are as follows:

Each of our executive officers serves in such capacity at the discretion of the Board.

Edward J. Bramson is Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. He has been an officer and director of the Company since 1987, and since January 1991 has been our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bramson also serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sherborne Holdings Incorporated, Sherborne & Company Incorporated, First Jeffson Corporation and Second Jeffson Corporation, and is a limited partner of Newhill Partners, L.P. These entities, which are private investment holding companies, may be deemed to be our affiliates. Mr. Bramson is also a director of Hillside Capital Incorporated, a private industrial holding company with which he has been associated since 1976.

Craig L. McKibben is Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and a director of the Company. Mr. McKibben has been an officer and a director of the Company since 1989. Mr. McKibben also serves as Vice President and Treasurer and a director of Ampex Holdings Corporation, as Vice President and Treasurer of Ampex Data Systems Corporation, and as President, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Ampex Finance Corporation. He is also Vice President and a director of Sherborne Holdings Incorporated and of Sherborne & Company Incorporated and is a Vice President of First Jeffson Corporation and Second Jeffson Corporation. Mr. McKibben also serves as disbursing agent of NHI, our former parent. From 1983 to 1989, he was a partner at the firm of Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P., a predecessor of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent public accountants.

Robert L. Atchison is Vice President of the Company. Since January 1994 he has been responsible for all our operating activities, and in 1996 assumed responsibility for certain of our sales and marketing activities. From April 1991 to January 1994, he was responsible for our engineering and operations. Mr. Atchison also serves as Vice President and a director of Ampex Data Systems Corporation and as President and a director of Ampex International Sales Corporation, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. He has served as an executive officer of the Company and various subsidiaries since 1987.

19

Joel D. Talcott is Vice President and Secretary of the Company, positions he has held since 1987. He has served as General Counsel since January 1996, a position he also held from 1987 to January 1994. He is also responsible for our patent licensing activities (having served as Patent Counsel from 1991 to 1987), and has supervisory responsibility for investor relations and corporate communications functions. Mr. Talcott also serves as Chairman of Ampex Data Systems Corporation, as Vice President and Secretary and a director of Ampex Data Systems Corporation, Ampex Finance Corporation and Ampex International Sales Corporation and as Vice President and Secretary of Ampex Holdings Corporation, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company.

Sharon M. Genberg is Vice President of the Company, a position she was appointed to in June 2002. She held the position of Director, Human Resources for 10 years prior to her appointment. She is responsible for all employment activity, employee benefit programs, compensation, training and development, facilities, maintenance, telecommunications, safety and security.

PART II

The following table sets forth the high and low prices for our Class A Common Stock for each quarter during fiscal 2002 and 2001. Since January 16, 1996, the Class A Common Stock has been traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “AXC.”

As of February 28, 2003, there were 920 holders of record of our Class A Common Stock.

The table below provides information relating to our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2002.

We have two equity compensation plans—our 1992 Stock Incentive Plan and our 2000 Stock Bonus Plan. Both of these plans were approved by our common stockholders, and provide for the issuance of shares of our Class A Common Stock. These plans do not provide for the issuance of any other class of our equity securities. We have no other equity compensation plans or individual compensation arrangements under which additional equity securities may be issued.

20

We have not declared any dividends on our Common Stock since our incorporation in 1992 and have no present intention of paying dividends on our Common Stock. We are also restricted by the terms of the indentures for the Senior Notes, Senior Discount Notes and certain other agreements and of our outstanding Noncumulative Preferred Stock as to the declaration of dividends. Under current circumstances, we may not pay any cash dividends on our Common Stock. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Notes 10 and 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

On or about October 29, 2001, we issued and sold to Sherborne & Company Incorporated (now named First Jeffson Corporation (“FJC”)), 1,000,000 shares of our Class A Stock having a market value at the time of issuance of approximately $160,000. The shares were issued as a commitment fee for the line of credit extended by FJC to our subsidiary, Ampex Data Systems Corporation, and no separate cash consideration was received by us. The shares were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) in reliance upon the exemption contained in Section 4(2) thereof for any transaction not involving a public offering of securities. FJC is wholly-owned by Edward J. Bramson, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant. The transaction was negotiated directly between us and FJC, and no underwriter, broker or dealer was involved in the transaction. Subsequently, we registered such shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission for resale under the 1933 Act.

During fiscal 2002, we redeemed 2,148 shares of Redeemable Preferred Stock and 51 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock by issuing to the holders 1,718,400 shares and 40,800 shares of our Class A Common Stock, respectively. No cash or other consideration was paid or received by us, directly or indirectly, in connection with the redemption. The shares of Class A Common Stock were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the issuance of securities exchanged by the issuer with the existing security holders exclusively where no commission or other remuneration is paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchange.

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The financial data required by Item 6 is included immediately following Item 15 hereof.

21

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Financial Reporting Release No. 60, which was recently released by the Securities and Exchange Commission, requires all companies to include a discussion of critical accounting policies or methods used in the preparation of financial statements. Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. The following is a brief discussion of the more significant accounting policies and methods used by us. In addition, Financial Reporting Release No. 61 was recently released by the SEC to require all companies to include a discussion to address, among other things, liquidity, off-balance sheet arrangements, contractual obligations and commercial commitments.

General

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The most significant estimates and assumptions relate to the recoverability of receivables and inventories and the adequacy of allowances for returns and doubtful accounts. Actual amounts could differ significantly from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“SAB 101”), as amended by SAB 101A and 101B. SAB 101 requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on Management’s judgments regarding the fixed nature of the fee charged for services rendered and products delivered and the collectibility of those fees. Should changes in conditions cause Management to determine these criteria are not met for certain future transactions, revenue recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected. Products sold are generally covered by a warranty for periods ranging from 90 days to one year. We accrue a warranty reserve for estimated costs to provide warranty services. Our estimate of costs to service our warranty obligations is based on historical experience and expectation of future conditions. To the extent we experience increased warranty claim activity or increased costs associated with servicing those claims, our warranty accrual will increase resulting in decreased gross profit.

Accounts Receivable

We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjust credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by our review of their current credit information. We continuously monitor collections and payments from our customers and maintain a provision for estimated credit losses based upon our historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that we have identified. While such credit losses have historically been within our expectations and the provisions established, we can not guarantee that we will continue to experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past. Since our accounts receivable are concentrated in a relatively few number of customers, a significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any one of these customers could have a material adverse impact on the collectibility of our accounts receivables and our future operating results.

22

Inventories

We value our inventory at the lower of the actual cost to purchase and/or manufacture the inventory or the current estimated market value of the inventory. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements for the next twelve months. A significant increase in the demand for our products could result in a short-term increase in the cost of inventory purchases while a significant decrease in demand could result in an increase in the amount of excess inventory quantities on hand. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by Management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. Additionally, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated or overstated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. If our inventory is determined to be overvalued, we would be required to recognize such costs in our cost of goods sold at the time of such determination. We make every effort to ensure the accuracy of our forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory and our reported operating results.

Deferred Taxes

We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We regularly review the deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income or loss, projected future taxable income or loss, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences.

Warranty

Our warranty reserve is established based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. While we believe that our warranty reserve is adequate and that the judgment applied is appropriate, such amounts estimated to be due and payable could differ materially from what will actually transpire in the future.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

The determination of our obligation and expense for pension and other postretirement benefits is dependent on our selection of certain assumptions used by actuaries in calculating such amounts. Those assumptions are described in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements and include, among others, the discount rate, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and rates of increase in compensation and healthcare costs. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and therefore, generally affect our recognized expense and recorded obligation in such future periods. While we believe that our assumptions are appropriate, significant differences in our actual experience or significant changes in our assumptions may materially affect our pension and other postretirement obligations and our future expense. Our domestic employees participate in a qualified noncontributory defined benefit pension plan. In early 1994, we amended the plan to terminate benefit service and compensation credit accruals as of February 1, 1994. To the extent that there is an increase or decrease to our pension liabilities based on our annual actuarial valuation, we record the change directly to the minimum pension liability account, which is part of stockholders’ deficit. We remain the plan sponsor of a pension plan (“Media Plan”) although we disposed of the company (“Media”) in November 1995. Media is contractually required to provide funding for its obligations. We include a nominal reserve in our liabilities for the Media Plan’s unfunded status which is substantially less than the actuarial determined unfunded plan liability, which totaled $15.7 million at December 31, 2002. Certain of our former employees of a closed foreign subsidiary were covered by a contributory pension plan. We include a reserve in our liabilities for the plan’s unfunded status based on an actuarial valuation.

23

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets and Investments

We periodically review the carrying value of our long-lived assets and investments for continued appropriateness. This review is based upon our projections of anticipated future cash flows. While we believe that our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect our evaluations.

Contingencies

We account for contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.” SFAS No. 5 requires that we record an estimated loss from a loss contingency when information available prior to issuance of our financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Accounting for contingencies such as environmental, legal and income tax matters requires us to use our judgment. While we believe that our accruals for these matters are adequate, if the actual loss from a loss contingency is significantly different than the estimated loss, our results of operations may be over or understated.

Overview

In 2002, we generated cash from continuing operations of $3.1 million which was an improvement over 2001 when we generated $0.7 million. Although sales levels at Data Systems in 2002 were down by approximately 3% from 2001 levels, a favorable sales mix of government contracts and beneficial effects of our cost reduction activities enabled Data Systems to report operating income of $4.3 million in 2002 compared to an operating loss of $5.4 million in 2001. On the other hand, results of our corporate licensing division were adversely affected during 2002 by the pending expiration of our analog video tape recorder patents and the expiration of a licensing agreement covering other patents. As a result, our royalty income declined to $4 million in 2002, down from $12 million in 2001. We are attempting to negotiate additional licenses of our digital camcorder patents and to enter into new licensing agreements covering our patents which we believe are being used in a variety of other digital consumer products such as digital still cameras and DVDs. Patent negotiations are time consuming and complex, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully negotiate new licensing agreements.

In prior years we exited the Internet business and discontinued certain other operations which were losing money. At the time of their closure we provided reserves for expected shut down costs and future commitments for which we remained obligated to make payment. In 2002, we made payments of $1.3 million against such commitments, whereas in 2001 our discontinued operations used $8.6 million in cash. We have been able to conserve cash by borrowing funds from a former affiliated company to fund $4.0 million of our pension contributions due in 2002 and 2001. We anticipate requiring this affiliate to make future pension contributions on our behalf which will increase our indebtedness by an equivalent amount. We restructured our senior debt in 2001, whereby we extended the maturity dates into the future and agreed to limit cash payments of interest and principal solely to the extent of “Available Cash Flow” which is based largely on royalty income less operating expenses and certain other permitted expenditures. In 2002, we reported total interest expense of $8.5 million, paid $1.2 million in cash and capitalized the balance as additional debt.

Our 2002 financial results were affected by a number of non-cash transactions, including a $6.7 million decrease in reserves provided on prior years’ foreign, Federal, state and deferred income taxes for years that have been closed to audit or are otherwise determined not to be required. We increased the restructuring reserve by $2.2 million to reflect the depressed Bay Area commercial real estate market where we remain obligated to pay rent on a facility that we abandoned in 2001. Also, while not a component of “Net Loss,” included in the determination of “Comprehensive Loss” is a charge of $26.2 million to minimum pension adjustment to reflect an actuarially computed increase in accumulated pension obligations over pension plan assets.

24

We ended 2002 with $9.0 million in cash representing a slight increase from year-end 2001. We believe that our cash balances together with the projected results from Data Systems and royalties from agreements presently in effect should be sufficient to satisfy all projected cash obligations for 2003. The results of our operations and the liquidity of our business are more fully discussed below.

The following discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Report.

Licensing Revenue and Product Groups

We have two operating segments: (1) high-performance mass data storage systems, instrumentation recorders and professional video products made by Data Systems; and (2) licensing of intellectual property by Ampex. For information regarding revenues, income or loss, assets and other financial data for each business segment, see Note 20 to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The first operating segment includes Data Systems’ three principal product groups:

Our intellectual property licensing segment generates royalty income from licenses granted to companies that manufacture consumer video products (such as VCRs and camcorders) and, in certain cases, professional video tape recorders.

No other class of similar products accounted for more than 15% of consolidated revenue during the comparison periods discussed below.

The following table shows licensing revenue and sales of Data System’s products by product group for the past three years.

Results of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2002

Net Product Sales.    Net sales decreased by 2.8% to $33.0 million in 2002 from $34.0 million in 2001, compared to $47.6 million in 2000. In 2002, the sales decline compared to 2001 was primarily due to lower analog television aftermarket sales, offset in part by greater DST and instrumentation product sales. The increase

25

in DST and instrumentation product sales was primarily attributed to sales to government customers who use our products for imaging and intelligence gathering. Government agencies and defense contractors are currently the largest market for Data Systems’ mass data storage and instrumentation recorders. This market has recently experienced an increase in activity as additional funding has been granted for intelligence gathering programs. There can be no assurance that this increased spending will continue beyond 2002. Government agencies and defense contractors have historically experienced significant pressure to reduce spending and we expect them to experience such pressure in the future.

Our backlog of firm orders was $4.7 million at December 31, 2002 compared to $4.6 million at December 31, 2001. We typically operate with low levels of backlog, requiring us to obtain the vast majority of each period’s orders in the same period that they must be shipped to the customer. Historically, a small number of large orders have significantly impacted sales levels and often orders are received late in the quarter making it difficult to predict sales levels in future periods. See “Business—Fluctuations in Operating Results; Seasonality; Backlog.”

Royalties.    Royalty income was $4.0 million in 2002, $12.1 million in 2001 and $12.3 million in 2000. Our royalty income is derived from licenses of our patents. We receive most of our royalty income from licenses granted to companies that manufacture consumer video products (such as VCRs and camcorders) and, in certain cases, professional video tape recorders. Certain license agreements have recently expired and our patents covering analog VCRs have expired which has caused the decline in royalty income between 2002 and 2001. We are negotiating with former licensees terms by which we will extend the license of our intellectual property.

We believe that manufacturers of digital cameras, computer video games and DVD recorders are using our digital technology and we have had technical and preliminary business discussions with certain manufacturers concerning the possible license of one or more of our patents for such use. In the fourth quarter of 2001, we received royalties for past use of our technology from a manufacturer of 6 millimeter digital camcorders. We are receiving ongoing payments for current period shipments of such products. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in negotiating additional licenses with other manufacturers of digital camcorders although we are attempting to do so.

In order for us to attain levels of royalty income realized in prior years, it will be necessary for us to successfully conclude licensing negotiations with manufacturers of digital camcorders, digital still cameras, DVDs and/or other consumer products. Our digital patents have historically not been licensed for use in many of these products and there can be no assurance that negotiations will be successful. In addition, we may be required to pursue litigation if negotiations are not successful. If successful, these discussions could result in incremental royalty income beginning in 2003. However, it is not possible to predict whether new license agreements will in fact be concluded.

Gross Profit.    Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 38.8% in 2002, 28.0% in 2001 and 38.8% in 2000. The increase in gross profit percentage in 2002 was due to a greater percentage of sales represented by Data Systems’ higher margin instrumentation product sales and growth in service contract revenue coupled with an overall decline in fixed manufacturing costs due to cost reduction programs carried out in earlier quarters. In 2001, we provided a $2.1 million reserve to write down the carrying value of inventory that our sales forecast indicated may not be utilized during the next 24 months.

Intellectual Property Costs.    Intellectual property costs relate to those expenditures incurred by our in-house patent department in procuring royalty income. During the three years ended December 31, 2002, we did not incur any significant expenditures associated with patent enforcement litigation. The costs of patent litigation can be material, and the institution of patent enforcement litigation may also increase the risk of counterclaims alleging infringement by us of patents held by third parties or seeking to invalidate patents held by us.

26

Selling and Administrative Expenses.    Selling and administrative expenses decreased to $11.2 million (30.3% of total revenue) in 2002 from $14.2 million (30.9% of total revenue) in 2001 and $15.1 million (25.3% of total revenue) in 2000. Selling and administrative costs declined in 2002 compared to 2001 and 2000 as a result of savings realized due to a reduction in headcount and relocation of certain administrative functions from Redwood City, CA to Colorado Springs, CO.

Research, Development and Engineering Expenses.    Research, development and engineering expenses represented 7.1%, 11.9% and 11.5% of total revenue in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. We do not capitalize any RD&E expenditures. We substantially completed our third generation DST product line “quad density” in mid 2001 and reduced headcount to focus our RD&E efforts in sustaining engineering activities. In addition, in recent years, we have decreased the amount spent in research, development and engineering programs due to declining sales levels. We may be required to make additional cuts in RD&E spending if Data System’s sales decline significantly from current levels.

Restructuring Charges (Credits).    In 2002, we recorded a net restructuring charge of $2.2 million, which included future rental payments net of estimated sublet income, with respect to a vacated administrative building in Redwood City, CA reflecting the depressed conditions in the Bay Area real estate market. In 2001, when we initiated the action to consolidate our activities in Redwood City we vacated one administrative building and wrote-off associated leasehold improvements for a restructuring charge of $3.5 million. In addition, the restructuring charge in 2001 included $1.0 million in connection with the elimination of 86 positions in engineering, manufacturing and administration in Redwood City, CA and Colorado Springs, CO. During 2002 and 2001, we paid $1.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively, related to employee termination benefits and lease costs of abandoned facilities. The remaining balance of accrued restructuring costs at December 31, 2002 will substantially be paid in 2003 and 2004. We evaluate the amount of accrued restructuring costs, including projected sublet income, on a quarterly basis, and may make additional adjustments in future periods if we determine that our actual obligations will differ significantly from remaining amounts accrued.

Operating Income (Loss).    We reported an operating loss of $0.2 million in 2002 compared to an operating loss of $2.3 million in 2001 and an operating income of $7.7 million in 2000. The reduced operating loss in fiscal 2002 compared to fiscal 2001 was primarily due to higher gross profit on product sales and lower selling and administrative expenses and research, development and engineering expenses due to headcount reductions, offset by lower royalty income. The operating loss in fiscal 2001 compared to the operating income in fiscal 2000 was primarily due to the decline in sales of Data Systems’ products, a write-down in inventory carrying values for potentially surplus material and a charge of $3.5 million for restructuring of continuing operations.

Interest Expense.    Interest expense increased in fiscal 2002 to $8.5 million, of which $1.2 million was paid in cash during the year, compared to $7.2 million in fiscal 2001, of which $2.7 million was paid in cash during the year, reflecting increases in the outstanding amount of senior debt and additional borrowings from Hillside. The increase in interest expense in fiscal 2001 when compared to the $5.7 million in fiscal 2000, of which $5.3 million was paid in cash during the year, is largely a result of the issuance of Senior Discount Notes in November 2000. Interest expense in future years will increase due to the capitalization of interest on the senior notes not paid in cash from Available Cash Flow as well as from additional notes issued to Hillside in the event they make future years’ pension contributions.

Amortization of Debt Financing Costs.    Financing costs associated with the February 2002 refinancing of the 12% Senior Notes totaled $0.4 million and were expensed in the first quarter of 2002. The remaining unamortized amount of financing costs associated with the original issuance of the January 1998 12% Senior Notes are being charged to expense through the new maturity date in 2008.

Interest Income.    Interest income is earned on cash balances and short and long-term investments.

27

Other (Income) Expense, Net.    Other (income) expense, net consists primarily of foreign currency transaction gains and losses resulting from our foreign operations. In 2000, other income included the value of the settlement of certain litigation between a shareholder of a former Internet investment and us.

Provision for Income Taxes.    During the year ended December 31, 2002, we decreased reserves provided on prior years’ foreign, Federal, state and deferred income taxes for years that have been closed to audit or otherwise determined not to be required, which resulted in a non-cash benefit of income taxes of $6.7 million. A provision for income taxes in the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 consisted primarily of foreign income taxes and withholding taxes on royalty income. We were not required to include any material provision for U.S. Federal income tax due to the utilization of net operating loss carry forwards and timing differences. At December 31, 2002, we had net operating loss carry forwards for income tax purposes of $191.7 million, expiring in the years 2005 through 2022. As a result of financing transactions that were completed in 1994 and 1995, we are limited in the amount of net operating loss carry forwards that can offset consolidated Federal taxable income in a given year. We derive pretax foreign income from our international operations, which are conducted principally by our foreign subsidiaries. In addition, our royalty income is subject, in certain cases, to foreign tax withholding. Such income is taxed by foreign taxing authorities, and our domestic interest and amortization expenses and operating loss carry forwards are not deductible in computing such foreign taxes.

Loss from Discontinued Operations and Loss on Disposal of Discontinued Operations.    In February 2001, we closed MicroNet, a wholly-owned subsidiary that made high performance disk arrays and storage area networks, established a reserve of $2.1 million for the costs of closure and wrote off our investment of $4.2 million as of December 31, 2000. We transferred MicroNet assets to an entity that distributed the asset sale proceeds to MicroNet creditors.

Through December 31, 2002, we paid and charged $1.3 million against the net liability of discontinued operations. During 2001, we entered into sublease agreements that reduced our estimated future lease costs by $0.4 million, which was recognized as income from discontinued operations. The remaining balance of the MicroNet reserve totals $0.4 million and is included in our net liabilities of discontinued operations. This obligation has not been discounted to present value.

A summary of the operating results of MicroNet are as follows:

In July 2001, we closed iNEXTV’s Internet video operations in New York City and ceased future funding of its other affiliates. We established a reserve of $10.3 million at June 30, 2001 to write down our investment to net realizable value and to provide for the costs of closure. In addition, the net liabilities of iNEXTV reflected on the balance sheet after the impairment charge, together with the provision for closure costs, are included in the net liabilities of discontinued operations. During 2001 and 2002, we paid and recorded charges of $2.0 million and $1.1 million, respectively, against the net liabilities of discontinued operations. The unamortized balance in the net liabilities of discontinued operations totaled $3.7 million at December 31, 2002.

28

A summary of the loss on disposal of iNEXTV are as follows:

A summary of the operating results of iNEXTV are as follows:

Net Loss.    We reported a net loss of $2.8 million in 2002, $28.1 million in 2001 and $36.7 million in 2000, primarily as a result of the factors discussed above under “Loss from Discontinued Operations and Loss on Disposal of Discontinued Operations.”

Benefit from Extinguishment of Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock.    We issued shares of Common Stock to satisfy our redemption obligation on our Redeemable and Convertible Preferred Stock. By agreement, such shares are valued at $2.50 per share which was higher than the market value per share at the time of redemption. As a result, we recorded a benefit available to common stockholders in the year ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 of $4.2 million, $5.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

Other Comprehensive Loss.    In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” we have recorded in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” a non-cash charge of $26.2 million to increase the additional minimum pension liability to $64.2 million, representing the excess of accumulated benefit obligations over the fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2002 that is yet to be recorded in our Income Statement as unfunded accrued pension cost. We terminated benefit service and compensation credit accruals under the pension plan in 1994 and since that date pension expense recorded in Net Income (Loss) has not been material. In future years, as a result of plan assumptions, the underfunded status of the plan may result in the recognition of non-cash pension losses which would be charged to operations.

Inflation and Changing Prices     Our Management does not believe that inflation or changing prices have had any material impact on our net sales, revenues or income from continuing operations for the fiscal years 2002, 2001 or 2000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General.    As a result of continuing losses, our liquidity has declined materially in recent years. In response, we have been required to restructure and extend the maturity date of our long-term senior debt, to discontinue unprofitable Internet video operations and to borrow funds from a former affiliate in order to make required contributions to our employee retirement pension plan. We have also significantly restructured and down-sized the operations of Data Systems, extended trade accounts payable balances and borrowed funds from an affiliate.

29

Management currently believes that these actions, coupled with anticipated royalty collections under licensing agreements presently in effect, should be sufficient to satisfy all projected cash obligations for at least the next 12 months. We are also attempting to negotiate new licensing agreements with manufacturers of digital camcorders, still cameras and DVDs. Until such agreements are concluded, our royalty income stream will be substantially lower than levels realized in prior years.

Our expectations as to our cash flows and future cash balances are based on a number of assumptions, including assumptions regarding anticipated revenues, customer purchasing and payment patterns, and improvements in general economic conditions, many of which are beyond our control. If we experience a decrease in demand for our products we maybe required to further reduce expenditures, borrow additional funds, or raise additional equity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in these efforts, the failure of which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our intended business objectives.

Recent Senior Debt Restructurings.    In the first quarter of 2002, we completed certain previously announced restructurings of our principal senior debt obligations. The 12% Senior Notes were exchanged for new Notes due 2008 and the due date of the Senior Discount Notes was extended to 2005. The restructured Notes are secured by liens on Ampex’s royalty stream that may be generated from existing and future patent licenses and, in addition, the Senior Discount Notes are secured by a deed of trust on Data Systems’ manufacturing facility in Colorado Springs, CO and are guaranteed by us.

The new securities provide for the payment of accrued interest and principal out of “Available Cash Flow”, which includes all future royalty proceeds received by Ampex, net of withholding taxes, less certain debt and pension payments and specified operating expenses and a working capital reserve of up to $2.5 million. We are required to generate a minimum of $25 million of Available Cash Flow during the three years ending December 31, 2004 or an event of default will occur under the Senior Note Indenture, which could allow the Noteholders the right to accelerate the indebtedness and foreclose on their liens. Prior to maturity, the new Notes are payable as to accrued interest and principal solely to the extent of Available Cash Flow (including certain potential asset sales) received by us, and unpaid accrued interest will be payable through the issuance of additional Notes or capitalized. During the year ended December 31, 2002, Available Cash Flow totaled $1.0 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2002, accrued interest on the Senior Discount Notes and Senior Notes totaled $2.0 million and $6.1 million, respectively, and a cash payment of $1.0 million was applied to reduce the principal and accrued interest on the Senior Discount Notes which represented Available Cash Flow during 2002. There were no cash payments made on the Senior Notes. Additional Senior Notes in the amount of $2.7 million, representing accrued interest for the period February 28, 2002 to August 15, 2002, were issued on August 15, 2002. In addition, additional Senior Notes in the amount of $3.1 million, representing accrued interest for the period August 16, 2002 to February 15, 2003 were issued in February 2003. The security interest in royalty payments granted to the new 12% Senior Noteholders is subordinated to the security for the Senior Discount Notes and no cash payments on the 12% Senior Notes may be made until all payments of interest and principal have been made on the Senior Discount Notes. All payments due at maturity on the Notes must be made in cash.

Management believes that these restructurings have improved our financial position by deferring significant debt repayments which would otherwise have been due in 2002 and 2003 and by limiting the amount of cash payments required to be made on the restructured Notes prior to maturity to the actual amount of Available Cash Flow received by us. However, application of Available Cash Flow to debt service will substantially restrict the amount of cash flow available for investment in our operations and facilities or other corporate purposes.

The indentures under which the 12% Senior Notes and the Senior Discount Notes were issued contain customary affirmative and negative restrictive covenants that limit the payment of dividends, the incurrence of additional indebtedness or liens, certain sales of assets and other actions by Ampex and restricted subsidiaries. In

30

the event of default, the holders of the Notes would be entitled to enforce the liens granted by us on our future patent royalty stream and the Colorado Springs facility and to apply amounts collected to repayment of the Notes.

Cash Flow.    We generated cash from continuing operating activities totaling $3.1 million in 2002 compared to $0.7 million in 2001. We used cash from continuing operating activities totaling $7.3 million in 2000. Cash used by discontinued operations totaled $1.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2002, $8.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2001 and $26.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2000.

Pursuant to an agreement between us, Hillside Capital Incorporated (“Hillside”) and certain other parties, dated November 22, 1994, Hillside is obligated to fund pension contributions in the event we are unable to do so. At our request, Hillside has made five pension contributions totaling $4.0 million through December 31, 2002, and has been issued notes by us in the amount of the pension contributions. We currently anticipate that for fiscal 2003 there will be no pension payments required by Ampex or Hillside based on the most recent actuarial valuation. However, substantial contributions are expected to be required beginning in 2004. It is anticipated that future contributions will be funded by Hillside. In that event, we would issue additional notes to Hillside in an equivalent amount. Under the terms of the notes, accrued interest is payable quarterly, a principal payment of $150,000 is due on the first anniversary of each note, with the remainder due on the fourth anniversary of the notes. During 2002, $450,000 was repaid on the Hillside Notes. The Notes are secured by a lien on Data Systems’ inventories. In September 2002, Ampex and Hillside entered into an agreement whereby an affiliate of Hillside assumed fiduciary responsibility for the Management of substantially all of the pension plan assets.

In October 2001, Data Systems entered into a revolving credit agreement with an affiliate, under which it borrowed $1 million, secured principally by the borrower’s inventories. We had guaranteed all borrowings. The facility was repaid in full on March 31, 2002 and it will not be renewed or replaced. Management’s current projections indicate that Data Systems should generate sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations in 2003.

Our finance subsidiary had a revolving credit line with a domestic financial institution to finance working capital and letter of credit requirements that expired in May 2002. At December 31, 2002, the Company had letters of credit issued against the facility totaling $1.1 million against which the Company has provided cash collateral. The Company is seeking to replace this line of credit with a new line of credit but has not received any binding commitments to date.

In June 2002, the staff of the American Stock Exchange (“Amex”) notified us that it had accepted our plan to bring itself into compliance with the Amex listing standards by June 30, 2003 and is continuing the listing of our Common Shares pursuant to this extension. By such date, we are required to have stockholders’ equity in excess of $4.0 million. At December 31, 2002, we reported a stockholders’ deficit of approximately $148 million. It does not appear likely that we will attain compliance with the Amex’s continued listing requirements by June 30, 2003, which is dependent on a number of factors that are beyond our control, including equity capital market conditions. Furthermore, the Amex has advised us that it may initiate delisting proceedings at any time, notwithstanding the extension it has provided us. If our Common Stock is delisted by the Amex, the market for our Common Stock may be adversely affected.

31

An aggregate listing of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments is as follows:

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.    During fiscal 2002 we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or will be reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues and expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that our Management believes is material to investors.

Recent Pronouncements

In May 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No.145, “Rescission of SFAS Nos. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of SFAS No. 13, and Technical Corrections” (“SFAS 145”). Among other things, SFAS 145 rescinds various pronouncements regarding early extinguishment of debt and allows extraordinary accounting treatment for early extinguishment only when the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary,

32

Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions” are met. SFAS 145 provisions regarding early extinguishment of debt are generally effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Company does not currently anticipate this statement to have any effect on its financial statements.

In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 (“SFAS 146”), “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” SFAS 146 requires that a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred, rather than at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS 146 will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations, although SFAS 146 may impact the timing of recognition of costs associated with future restructuring, exit or disposal activities.

In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (“SFAS 148”), “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure—An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” SFAS 148 requires companies to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” to require prominent disclosures both in annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. We have included the disclosures required by SFAS 148 in Note 15—“Common Stock, Stock Options and Warrants.” We do not intend to adopt the accounting provisions of FAS 123 for employee compensation.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” The Interpretation elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees, including loan guarantees such as standby letters of credit. It also clarifies that at the time a company issues a guarantee, the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes under the guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and annual financial statements. The provisions related to recognizing a liability at inception of the guarantee for the fair value of the guarantor’s obligations do not apply to product warranties or to guarantees accounted for as derivatives. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002.

We, as permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with our Bylaws, indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences, subject to certain limits, while they were serving at our request in such capacity. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited; however, we have a Director and Officer Insurance Policy that enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result of the insurance policy coverage we believe the fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal.

Our sales agreements indemnify our customers for any expenses or liability resulting from claimed infringements of patents, trademarks or copyrights of third parties. The terms of these indemnification agreements are generally perpetual any time after execution of the agreement. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited. However, to date, we have not paid any claims or been required to defend any lawsuits with respect to any claim.

In addition, we have guaranteed certain lease payments with respect to equipment and real estate of subsidiaries as disclosed in Note 3 and 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We have recorded a liability for substantially the full amount of our guarantee, net of the anticipated sublease income expected to be realized.

33

As more fully described in Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we are contingently liable to provide funding for plan benefits under a pension plan of a former affiliate (“Media”) which was sold in 1995. Presently the unfunded accumulated benefit liability is $15.7 million, substantially all of which is not recorded as a liability by us.

We may have continuing liability with respect to environmental contamination at certain sites associated with the operations of Media. If Media fails to discharge its responsibilities with respect to such sites, we may be liable. We have not accrued any liability for contingent liabilities we may incur with respect to the Media sites. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Until this interpretation, a company generally included another entity in its consolidated financial statements only if it controlled the entity through voting interests. FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity’s activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity’s residual returns. Management is currently evaluating the effect of this statement on our results of operations and financial position.

In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21 (“EITF 00-21”), “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” EITF 00-21 provides guidance on how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The provisions of EITF 00-21 will apply to revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. We do not believe the adoption of EITF 00-21 will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. The investment portfolio generally has been comprised of US Treasury Bills and Euro government bonds. These securities mature within one year and are classified as available for sale in accordance with FAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Investments in both fixed-rate and floating-rate interest-earning instruments carry a degree of interest-rate risk. Fixed-rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating-rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall.

At December 31, 2002 we held an investment in Euro denominated government bonds for $1.5 million. We did have a number of cash and cash equivalent accounts whose return varied directly proportionally to US interest rates. A decrease in interest rates would not have a material effect on the current-year financial condition or results of operations.

Our finance subsidiary had a revolving credit line with a domestic financial institution to finance working capital and letter of credit requirements that expired in May 2002. Average borrowings under these agreements during both 2002 and 2001 were less than $0.2 million at an average interest rate of 5.4% and 7.7%, respectively. Maximum borrowings outstanding at any time during 2002 and 2001 were $1.0 million and $2.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2002, we had letters of credit issued against the facility totaling $1.1 million. If a new facility was obtained to replace the expired working capital line of credit and if a 10% increase in interest rates were to occur at January 1, 2003 and remain in effect throughout 2003, and the balance remained the same, interest expense and cash outflow would increase by less than $20,000.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Certain of our licensing agreements are denominated in foreign currencies. Such currencies fluctuate against the US dollar impacting the amount of cash collected and revenue recognized. International revenues from our

34

foreign subsidiaries were less than 25% of total revenues. International product sales are made mostly from our foreign sales subsidiaries and are typically denominated in the local currency of each country. The foreign subsidiaries incur most of their expenses in the local foreign currency. Accordingly, all foreign subsidiaries use the local currency as their functional currency.

Our international business is subject to risks typical of an international business including, but not limited to, differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions, and foreign exchange rate volatility. Accordingly, our future results could be materially adversely impacted by changes in these or other factors.

Our exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations arises in part from intercompany accounts in which costs incurred in the United States are charged to our foreign sales subsidiaries. These intercompany accounts are typically denominated in the US dollar. We are also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the financial results of foreign subsidiaries are translated into US dollars in consolidation. As exchange rates vary, these results, when translated, may vary from expectations and adversely impact overall expected profitability. The effect of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on us in 2002 and 2001 was not material.

Investment Risk

We have in the past invested in equity instruments of technology companies for business and strategic purposes. These investments are included in other long-term assets and are accounted for under the cost method when ownership is less than 20% and we do not have significant influence over the business operations. Our policy is to regularly review the assumptions underlying the operating performance and cash flow forecasts in assessing the carrying values. We identify and record impairment losses on long-lived assets when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. All of our investments in the Internet video industry have been written down to their estimated net realizable value.

The financial statements required by Item 8 and the financial statement schedules required by Item 14(d) are included following Item 14 hereof. The supplementary data called for by Item 8 is not applicable to us.

Not applicable.

PART III

The information required by this item regarding directors and compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934 is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement for our 2003 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”). Information regarding executive officers is included in Part I hereof as Item 4A and is incorporated by reference into this Item 10.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement.

35

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement and to Item 5 of Part II of this report with respect to our equity compensation plans.

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our Proxy Statement.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure based closely on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, Management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and Management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with participation of our Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date we completed our evaluation. Therefore no corrective actions were taken.

PART IV

(a) Documents Filed with this Report:

36

37

38

39

(b) Reports on Form 8-K.    No reports on Form 8-K were filed by Company during the fourth quarter of 2002.

(c) Exhibits.    See Item 14(a)(3) above.

40

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table summarizes certain selected financial data, which have been derived from and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements, and the Notes thereto, and with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” both of which are included elsewhere herein. There have been no cash dividends declared for the periods presented.

Subsequent to year-end 2000, we announced that we were closing MicroNet, a business which manufactured disk-based storage products that we acquired in 1998. The operating results of MicroNet have been classified as “Discontinued Operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for each of the three years ended December 31, 2000. We have excluded the assets and liabilities of MicroNet in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2000. The Consolidated Balance Sheets of prior periods have not been restated to exclude the assets and liabilities of MicroNet.

In the second quarter of 2001, we announced that we were closing iNEXTV, a business involved in Internet video operations started in 1999. The operating results of iNEXTV have been classified as “Discontinued Operations” in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for each of the three years ended December 31, 2001. We have excluded the assets and liabilities of iNEXTV in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2001. The Consolidated Balance Sheets of prior periods have not been restated to exclude the assets and liabilities of iNEXTV.

Statement of Operations Data:

Balance Sheet Data:

41

SIGNATURES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

AMPEX CORPORATION

By:          /s/ Edward J. Bramson          

Edward J. Bramson

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date:       March 28, 2002

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below does hereby constitute and appoint Edward J. Bramson, Craig L. McKibben, Joel D. Talcott, David Griffin or any of them, with full power to act, his attomey-in-fact, with the power of substitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this report, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

42

CERTIFICATION

I, Edward J. Bramson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

43

CERTIFICATION

I, Craig L. McKibben, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify that:

44

AMPEX CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of Ampex Corporation:

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) on page 36 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ampex Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) on page 36 present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

San Jose, California

February 14, 2003

F-2

AMPEX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

AMPEX CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)