Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarter Ended October 31, 2002
¨ |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission File number 000-25829
PORTAL SOFTWARE, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware |
|
77-0369737 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
10200 South De Anza Boulevard
Cupertino, California 95014
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (408) 572-2000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
On November 30, 2002, 178,272,635 shares of the Registrants Common Stock, $0.001 par
value, were outstanding.
PORTAL SOFTWARE, INC.
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Part I: Financial Information |
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Item 2: |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Item 3: |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Part II: Other Information |
|
|
|
Item 1: |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Item 4: |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Item 5: |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Item 6: |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
2
Item 1:
Financial Statements
PORTAL SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands; unaudited)
|
|
October 31, 2002
|
|
|
January 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
26,729 |
|
|
$ |
36,318 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
32,479 |
|
|
|
75,463 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,835 and $7,869 at October 31, 2002 and January 31,
2002, respectively |
|
|
20,731 |
|
|
|
22,323 |
|
Restricted short-term investments |
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,733 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
4,837 |
|
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
86,385 |
|
|
|
143,638 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
23,580 |
|
|
|
43,146 |
|
Purchased developed technology, net |
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
Restricted long-term investments |
|
|
14,904 |
|
|
|
15,414 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
3,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
133,039 |
|
|
$ |
213,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
5,109 |
|
|
$ |
4,079 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
10,218 |
|
|
|
12,136 |
|
Current portion accrued restructuring costs |
|
|
20,486 |
|
|
|
11,991 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
12,812 |
|
|
|
17,571 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
22,774 |
|
|
|
37,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
71,494 |
|
|
|
83,830 |
|
Long-term accrued restructuring costs |
|
|
24,982 |
|
|
|
22,990 |
|
Long-term notes payable |
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1,658 |
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,733 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
537,736 |
|
|
|
536,249 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
(709 |
) |
Notes receivable from stockholders |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(335 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(502,985 |
) |
|
|
(433,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
34,878 |
|
|
|
101,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
133,039 |
|
|
$ |
213,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
3
PORTAL SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (in thousands, except per share amounts; unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended October
31,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October
31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License fees |
|
$ |
10,701 |
|
|
$ |
9,957 |
|
|
$ |
32,787 |
|
|
$ |
54,471 |
|
Services |
|
|
19,459 |
|
|
|
21,797 |
|
|
|
57,247 |
|
|
|
66,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
30,160 |
|
|
|
31,754 |
|
|
|
90,034 |
|
|
|
121,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of license fees |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
Cost of services |
|
|
10,295 |
|
|
|
13,814 |
|
|
|
33,032 |
|
|
|
50,434 |
|
Amortization and impairment of purchased developed technology and licenses |
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
3,930 |
|
|
|
4,218 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
8,094 |
|
|
|
14,057 |
|
|
|
29,474 |
|
|
|
45,789 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
12,071 |
|
|
|
18,387 |
|
|
|
40,637 |
|
|
|
68,681 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4,372 |
|
|
|
12,156 |
|
|
|
12,975 |
|
|
|
32,417 |
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation (1) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
Amortization of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,023 |
|
Reduction in intangibles due to impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,841 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
30,668 |
|
|
|
19,331 |
|
|
|
36,721 |
|
|
|
60,623 |
|
Impairment of assets |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
69,335 |
|
|
|
83,324 |
|
|
|
158,750 |
|
|
|
491,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(39,175 |
) |
|
|
(51,570 |
) |
|
|
(68,716 |
) |
|
|
(370,910 |
) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
6,623 |
|
Write-down of impaired investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
(38,778 |
) |
|
|
(49,374 |
) |
|
|
(67,351 |
) |
|
|
(368,287 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
(689 |
) |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(3,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(39,564 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,063 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(371,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
|
176,646 |
|
|
|
172,559 |
|
|
|
175,854 |
|
|
|
171,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Amortization of
deferred stock compensation relates to the following expense categories: |
Cost of services |
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
1,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
4
PORTAL SOFTWARE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands; unaudited)
|
|
Nine Months Ended October
31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(69,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(371,480 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
9,777 |
|
|
|
13,743 |
|
Amortization of deferred stock compensation |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
Amortization and impairment of intangibles |
|
|
3,930 |
|
|
|
35,241 |
|
Reduction in goodwill due to impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,841 |
|
Restructuring costs |
|
|
50,290 |
|
|
|
60,623 |
|
Impairment of assets |
|
|
1,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of impaired investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Gain on sale of investments |
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
1,592 |
|
|
|
52,194 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
1,165 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
(5,388 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(1,917 |
) |
|
|
(4,179 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(32,726 |
) |
|
|
(22,220 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(14,693 |
) |
|
|
(26,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(49,916 |
) |
|
|
(64,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(140,629 |
) |
|
|
(149,526 |
) |
Maturity of short-term investments |
|
|
137,391 |
|
|
|
138,729 |
|
Sales of short-term investments |
|
|
46,346 |
|
|
|
67,761 |
|
Purchases of long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,992 |
) |
Maturity of long-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(5,057 |
) |
|
|
(12,189 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of equity investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
Business combination, net of cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
38,051 |
|
|
|
39,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments received on stockholder notes receivable |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Payments on notes payable |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(2,298 |
) |
Principal payments under capital lease obligations, net of proceeds |
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of repurchases |
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
7,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
3,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(9,589 |
) |
|
|
(21,788 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
36,318 |
|
|
|
69,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
26,729 |
|
|
$ |
47,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
5
PORTAL SOFTWARE, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Significant
Accounting Policies:
Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation
Portal Software, Inc. or Portal, develops, markets and supports product-based customer management and billing solutions for communications
and content service providers. Portals convergent platform enables service providers to deliver voice, data, video and content services with multiple networks, payment models, pricing plans and value chains. Portal markets its products
worldwide through a combination of a direct sales force and distribution partners. Substantially all of Portals license revenues are derived from sales of its Infranet product line.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Portal and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at October 31, 2002 and the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001 and
the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001 are not audited. In the opinion of management, these financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of
the results for and as of the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year or for any future period. The condensed consolidated financial statement
information as of January 31, 2002 is derived from audited financial statements as of that date. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in Portals Annual Report on Form
10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 27, 2002.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior fiscal year have been reclassified to
conform to the presentation adopted in the current fiscal year. Accrued restructuring liabilities have been reclassified between current and long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Certain costs classified as research and
development expenses in prior fiscal periods have been reclassified to amortization and impairment of purchased developed technology and licenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. During the second quarter of the current fiscal year, Portal initiated a restructuring plan to effect a change in its operations and cost structure to more fully align
with its revised business strategy requiring a greater focus on the needs of Tier 1 telecommunications service providers. The restructure activities during the current fiscal year included severance, consolidation of facilities, abandonment of
certain assets and an evaluation of all remaining assets. The accruals made as a result of these activities necessarily entailed a significant number of estimates by management, especially as to the time required for various real estate markets to
recover.
Revenue Recognition
License revenues are comprised of fees for multi-year or perpetual licenses, which are primarily derived from contracts with corporate customers and resellers. Revenue from
license fees is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the product has occurred, no significant Portal obligations with regard to implementation remain, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is
probable. We recognize license revenue
6
using the residual method. The software is considered to have been delivered when Portal has provided the customer with the access codes that allow for immediate possession of the software. If
the fee due from the customer is not fixed or determinable, revenue is recognized as payments become due from the customer. If collectibility is not considered probable, revenue is recognized when the fee is collected. Revenue from arrangements with
customers who are not the ultimate users (resellers) is not recognized until evidence of an arrangement with an end user has been received. Portals policy should we enter into a transaction with a customer to purchase the customers
products contemporaneously with the customers purchase of software from Portal, is to recognize the amount of license fees paid to Portal net of the fees paid for the customers products.
Services revenues are primarily comprised of revenue from systems integration or other consulting fees, maintenance agreements and
training. Arrangements that include software services are evaluated to determine whether those services are essential to the functionality of other elements of the arrangement. When software services are considered essential, license and service
revenue under the arrangement is recognized using contract accounting. When software services are not considered essential, which has been the case in the majority of our license arrangements, the revenue related to the license is recorded upon
delivery and the revenue related to the fair value of the software services is recognized as the services are performed. Fair value is based on the price charged when these services are sold separately. Maintenance agreements provide technical
support and include the right to unspecified upgrades on an if-and-when-available basis. Maintenance revenue is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis as services revenue over the life of the related agreement, which is typically one year.
Customer advances and billed amounts due from customers in excess of revenue recognized are generally recorded as deferred revenue.
Portals revenue recognition policy takes into consideration the creditworthiness of the customer in determining the probability of collection as a criterion for revenue recognition. The determination of
creditworthiness requires the exercise of judgment, which affects Portals revenue recognition. If a customer is deemed not to be creditworthy, all revenue under arrangements with that customer is recognized upon receipt of cash. The
creditworthiness of customers is re-assessed on a regular basis and revenue is deferred until cash receipt, if appropriate. Additionally, when Portal enters into contracts with industry standard payment terms, it is Portals policy to recognize
such revenue when the customer is deemed to be creditworthy and collection of the receivable is assured.
Portal
periodically updates its revenue recognition policies to reflect changes in the marketplace, its business practices and experiences with its customers to ensure compliance with revenue recognition rules and good business practices. During the
quarter ended July 31, 2002 Portal revised its policy to better reflect industry practices and the shift in Portals customer base from Internet service providers to Tier 1 telecommunications companies. The new policy continues to ensure
compliance with technical pronouncements associated with software revenue recognition. Previously, Portals policy presumed that arrangements with payment terms extending beyond 60 days did not meet the criteria for fixed and determinable fees.
Under Portals revised policy, arrangements with payment terms extending beyond 60 days may meet the fixed and determinable fee criteria based upon Portals evaluation of the risk of concession, subject to review and approval by
Portals CFO. This change had no effect on revenue recognized during the quarter of the change. During the quarter ended October 31, 2002 Portal entered into one transaction with multiple payment terms up to 90 days and Portal recognized
approximately $0.2 million of license revenue as a result.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Substantially all of Portals software and services have been sold to North American, European and Asia-Pacific
communication and content service providers, including mobile wireless companies, broadband, electronic content and Internet access companies, as well as other Internet and e-commerce companies. Accordingly, adverse economic trends affecting the
communications industry may increase our credit risk. Portal performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and does not require collateral. Portal maintains an allowance for potential credit losses and to date such losses have been within
managements expectations. No individual customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenues during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002.
7
One individual customer, AOL Time Warner, accounted for 23% and 18% of total
revenues during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2001, respectively.
Segment Information
Portal operates solely in one segment, the development and marketing of business infrastructure software.
Portals foreign operations consist of sales, marketing and support activities through its foreign subsidiaries and an overseas reseller network as well as one development site in Germany that is currently being closed. Operating losses
generated by the foreign operations of Portal and their corresponding identifiable assets were not material in any period presented. Portals chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis,
accompanied by disaggregated information about revenues and certain direct expenses by geographic region for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance. Portals assets are primarily located in its corporate
office in the United States and are not allocated to any specific region, therefore Portal does not produce reports for, or measure the performance of its geographic regions based on any asset-based metrics. Therefore, geographic information is
presented only for revenues.
Portals export revenues represented 73% and 66% of total revenues in the three
and nine months ended October 31, 2002, compared with approximately 46% in the comparable periods ended October 31, 2001. Portals export revenues were derived from sales to Europe (which is defined by Portal as Europe, Middle East and Africa)
and Intercontinental (which is defined by Portal as Asia-Pacific, Japan and Latin America). For the three months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001, European revenues were $18.4 million and $8.9 million and Intercontinental revenues were $3.7
million and $5.6 million. For the nine months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001, European revenues were $44.8 million and $36.8 million and Intercontinental revenues were $14.4 million and $20.3 million.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Portal considers all highly liquid, low-risk debt instruments with an original maturity at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of October 31, 2002 and 2001, cash
equivalents and short-term investments consist primarily of commercial paper, corporate notes, money market funds and government securities. All short-term investments mature within 24 months.
Portal classifies, at the date of acquisition, its cash equivalents and short-term investments as available-for-sale in accordance with
the provisions of the FASBs Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (FAS 115). Securities are reported at fair market value, with the related
unrealized gains and losses included within stockholders equity. Debt and discount securities are adjusted for straight-line amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity, both of which are included in interest income.
Realized gains and losses are recorded using the specific identification method and were immaterial for all periods presented.
The following schedule summarizes the estimated fair value of Portals cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments (in thousands):
|
|
October 31, 2002
|
|
January 31, 2002
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
$ |
15,515 |
|
$ |
7,895 |
Money market funds |
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
16,435 |
U.S. Government securities |
|
|
6,199 |
|
|
11,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,729 |
|
$ |
36,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Short-term investments at October 31, 2002 (in thousands, unaudited):
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Corporate notes |
|
$ |
9,604 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
9,647 |
|
U.S. Government securities |
|
|
24,407 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
24,441 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
(1,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,609 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,402 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
$ |
(12 |
) |
|
$ |
32,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments at January 31, 2002:
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
Loss
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Corporate notes |
|
$ |
39,086 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
39,669 |
|
U.S. Government securities |
|
|
35,485 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
35,518 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
(1,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,846 |
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
75,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of short-term investments classified by
date of maturity is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
October 31, 2002
|
|
|
January 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
10,087 |
|
|
$ |
59,512 |
|
Due within two years |
|
|
24,001 |
|
|
|
17,669 |
|
Restricted short-term investments |
|
|
(1,609 |
) |
|
|
(1,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32,479 |
|
|
$ |
75,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of October 31, 2002 and January 31, 2002, restricted short-term
investments combined with restricted long-term investments represent collateral for five letters of credit and one bank guarantee. The five letters of credit issued in lieu of a cash security deposit are renewable annually and expire on various
dates from October 31, 2005 through March 5, 2021. The bank guarantee, issued to secure outstanding bank loans of former shareholders of Solution42, is for $1.5 million and expires on April 30, 2003. Restricted investments consist of U.S. Government
securities maturing over a period of up to two years.
The restricted long-term investments are classified
as held-to-maturity and, consequently, unrealized gains and losses are not recorded. As of October 31, 2002 and January 31, 2002, amortized cost approximated fair value.
Portal also invests in equity instruments of privately held companies for business and strategic purposes. These investments are included in other assets, in the amount of
$1.5 million (total investment of $2.0 million net of a valuation allowance of $0.5 million) as of October 31, 2002 and January 31, 2002. The investments are accounted for using the cost method as Portal does not have the ability to exercise
significant influence over the operations of these companies and Portals investment is less than 20% of the outstanding voting shares in each entity. Portal monitors its investments for other than temporary impairment, basing its assessment on
a review of the investees operations and other indicators. Other indicators include, but are not restricted to, limited capital resources, limited prospects of receiving additional financing and prospects for liquidity of the related
securities.
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, Portal recorded charges of $4.0 million to reflect the
other than temporary decline in value of its equity investments. The remaining $1.5 million was determined to not be impaired based upon a review of the financial statements of the company in which we hold the investment. Even though the
9
company is still generating losses, it has experienced growth in revenues and has continued its efforts to reduce its cost structure. Portal will continue to monitor its investment in this
company for signs of deterioration.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
FAS 142 requires long-lived assets and intangibles, including goodwill, be evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. On a regular basis, the estimated future net cash flows associated with the asset are compared to the assets carrying amount to determine if impairment has
occurred. If such assets are deemed impaired, an impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the assets is recognized. If quoted market prices for the assets are not available, the fair value is
calculated using the present value of estimated expected future net cash flows. The cash flow calculations are based on managements best estimates, using appropriate assumptions and projections at the time. During the year ended January 31,
2002, Portal recorded charges of $199.2 million to reflect the impairment of goodwill and purchased developed technology related to Portals investments in Solution42 and BayGate.
Upon adoption of FAS 142 in its fiscal year beginning February 1, 2002, Portal is required to present specific disclosures under the transitional provisions of FAS 142. The
following table presents the loss for all periods presented, as adjusted, to exclude the amortization of goodwill (in thousands, except per share data; unaudited).
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Net loss as reported |
|
$ |
(39,564 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,063 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(371,480 |
) |
Add back: Amortization of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net loss |
|
$ |
(39,564 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,664 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(340,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share as reported |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.17 |
) |
Add back: Amortization of goodwill per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended October 31, 2002, Portal recorded charges
of $2.9 million in impairment of assets related to computer equipment and software that we abandoned. Of the total impairment charge, $1.4 million was related to third-party software for which some of the functionality was integrated into
Portals product. The entire software was abandoned after Portal re-assessed its need for it and decided against further integration due to the reductions in workforce. The impairment of this software is included in amortization and impairment
of purchased developed technology and licenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The remaining $1.5 million in impairment of assets is included in a separate classification in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
In accordance with FAS 128, basic and diluted net loss per share have been computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the
period, less shares subject to repurchase.
10
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per
share data; unaudited):
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Basic and diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(39,564 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,063 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(371,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding |
|
|
176,694 |
|
|
|
173,175 |
|
|
|
175,938 |
|
|
|
172,365 |
|
Less: Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(616 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
|
176,646 |
|
|
|
172,559 |
|
|
|
175,854 |
|
|
|
171,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.29 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss), which includes certain changes in
equity of the company that are excluded from net income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001 is as follows (in thousands; unaudited):
|
|
Three months ended October 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended October 31,
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(39,564 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,063 |
) |
|
$ |
(69,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(371,480 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(541 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(39,861 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,817 |
) |
|
$ |
(68,864 |
) |
|
$ |
(371,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2002, the FASB issued FAS 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 62, Amendment of FASB Statement No.
13 (FAS 13), and Technical Corrections which requires the gains and losses on extinguishments of debt to be classified as income or loss from continuing operations rather than as extraordinary items as previously required. Additionally, FAS
145 amends FAS 13, requiring certain modifications to capital leases be treated as sale-leaseback transactions and modifies the accounting for subleases when the original lessee remains as a guarantor. Adoption of FAS 145 is required for fiscal
years beginning after May 15, 2002. The adoption of FAS 145 will not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In July 2002, the FASB issued FAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities which supersedes Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 94-3. FAS 146 requires companies to record
liabilities for costs associated with exit or disposal activities to be recognized only when the liability is incurred instead of at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal activity. FAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities
initiated after December 31, 2002. Previously issued financial statements will not be restated. The adoption of FAS 146 will not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
(3) Restructuring
In fiscal 2002, Portals Board of Directors approved two plans to reduce its cost structure. The plans were a combination of a reduction in workforce, consolidations of facilities and asset write-offs. As a result of
the restructuring plans, Portal incurred charges of $71.0 million in fiscal 2002. The estimated costs of abandoning leased facilities, including estimated costs to sublease were determined through assessment of market information trend analyses.
11
In July 2002, Portal began implementation of a third plan to effect a change in its operations and cost structure to more
fully align with its revised business strategy requiring a greater focus on the needs of Tier 1 telecommunications service providers. The plan includes a further reduction in workforce of approximately 250 employees, facilities reductions and asset
write-offs. In connection with this plan, Portal recorded a restructuring charge of $6.1 million and $30.7 million for the quarters ended July 31, 2002 and October 31, 2002, respectively. The restructuring charges included approximately $6.2 million
of severance related amounts, $17.4 million of committed excess facilities, primarily related to lease expenses net of anticipated sublease income and $11.6 million in asset write-offs.
Portals restructuring plans specifically identified facilities to be vacated, throughout North America and internationally in Germany, Japan and the United Kingdom.
Portal vacated the facilities on various dates, as planned, through September 2002. A portion of Portals headquarters will also be vacated by December 2002. The planned exit dates for each facility were considered when calculating the
restructuring charges. For the portion of the facilities, if any, that remained in operating activities subsequent to the plans approval, Portal has included rental costs relating to the period following the planned exit date in the
restructuring charges. Prior to vacating these facilities, or portions thereof that Portal intends to sublease, rental expense continued to be included in operating expenses.
Subsequent to the quarter ended October 31, 2002, Portal was successful in negotiating the termination of some of its leases. The restructuring accrual as of October 31,
2002 reflects the terms of these agreements.
The $11.6 million in asset write-offs consist of the following
significant assets:
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements: As a result of the abandonment of various operating lease facilities as defined in the restructuring plans, Portal also
abandoned the related leasehold improvements. Upon vacating the facilities, Portal wrote-off the net book values of the related leasehold improvements. This charge impacted its North American and European regions. |
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures: As a result of abandoning facilities, Portal decided to also abandon furniture and fixtures in the vacated facilities or
portion of the facilities. Upon vacating the facilities and abandoning the furniture and fixtures, Portal wrote off the net book value of the abandoned assets. This charge impacted the North American and European regions.
|
|
|
|
Software: As a result of the reductions in force, Portal assessed its need for the number of licenses for software currently in use. Based on current
and projected future needs, Portal determined that the number of licenses purchased exceeds the actual number needed. Accordingly, Portal abandoned the unused licenses and wrote-off a portion of the license fees related to these purchased software
packages. Additionally, Portal was working on a project that utilized third-party software. Due to the reductions in force, Portal re-assessed its need for the software, and abandoned it, due to the elimination of related resources. These charges
impacted the North American and European regions. |
As of October 31, 2002, the remaining
accrued restructuring costs were $45.5 million and have been apportioned between current and long-term liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The remaining severance is expected to be paid through the second quarter of fiscal
2004. The long-term portion of the accrued restructuring costs is made up of lease payments for vacated facilities, net of expected sublease income and is currently expected to be paid through June 2006. Actual future cash requirements may differ
materially from the accrual at October 31, 2002, particularly if actual sublease income is significantly different from current estimates or if the company is successful in its efforts to renegotiate its facility leases.
12
A summary of restructuring activities along with the respective remaining reserves follows below. The restructuring
charges are net of decreases to the accrual in the amount of $2.2 million due to favorable lease negotiations that occurred subsequent to the quarter ended October 31, 2002.
(in thousand; unaudited) |
|
Balance remaining January 31, 2002
|
|
Restructuring Charges
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Non-cash
|
|
|
Balance remaining October 31, 2002
|
Severance |
|
$ |
1,950 |
|
$ |
6,175 |
|
$ |
(5,459 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,666 |
Facilities |
|
|
29,976 |
|
|
17,374 |
|
|
(6,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,933 |
Asset write-offs |
|
|
2,381 |
|
|
11,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,992 |
) |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
674 |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,981 |
|
$ |
36,721 |
|
$ |
(12,242 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,992 |
) |
|
$ |
45,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, Portal integrated certain functionality of
third-party software into its product. Due to the reductions in the workforce, Portal re-assessed its need for the software and abandoned it as the related resources were eliminated. A $1.4 million charge was recorded in the quarter ended October
31, 2002 and has been included in the amortization and impairment of purchased developed technology and licenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
(4) Income Taxes
During the three
and nine months ended October 31, 2002, we recognized tax expense of $0.8 million and $2.3 million primarily as a result of foreign withholding taxes on revenues and tax on earnings generated from our foreign operations. Under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109 (FAS 109), deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will
be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. FAS 109 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets are more likely than not. Based on the weight of available evidence, Portal has provided a full
valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. Portal will continue to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.
(5) Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
On July 9, 2001, a purported class action complaint was filed in the Federal District Court Southern District
of New York against Portal, certain of its officers and several underwriters of the Companys initial public offering (IPO). The lawsuit alleges violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 10(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, arising from alleged improprieties by the underwriters in connection with our 1999 IPO and follow-on public offering, and claims to be on behalf of all persons who purchased Portal Software shares
from May 5, 1999 through December 6, 2000. Four additional nearly identical class actions were also filed in July and August 2001 based on essentially the same facts and allegations. Specifically, the complaints allege the underwriters charged
certain of their customers fees in excess of those disclosed in the prospectus and engaged in certain allegedly improper activities in connection with the distribution of the IPO shares. The complaint was subsequently amended to allege similar
claims with respect our secondary public offering in September 1999.
The cases have been consolidated into a
single action, and a consolidated complaint was filed on April 19, 2002. These actions are part of the IPO Securities Litigation against over 300 issuers and nearly 40 underwriters alleging claims virtually identical to those alleged against the
Company. The action seeks damages in an unspecified amount. A motion to dismiss addressing issues common to the companies and individuals who have been sued in these actions was filed on July 15, 2002.
13
In the opinion of management, resolution of this litigation is not expected to
have a material adverse effect on the financial position of Portal. However, depending on the amount and timing, an unfavorable resolution of these matters could materially and adversely affect our future results of operations or cash flows in a
particular period.
(6) Subsequent Events
Subsequent to the quarter ending October 31, 2002, Portals Board of Directors approved a plan to re-price stock options for continuing employees only. The plan
excludes the CEO and members of the Board of Directors. The new exercise price for the re-priced options, effective as of November 7, 2002, is $0.69 per share with no changes to the vesting schedules. Under this re-pricing plan, approximately
20,410,800 options became subject to variable accounting prospectively whereby stock based compensation for the options will be re-measured quarterly and recorded in the consolidated statement of operations for each reporting period. Of these
options, approximately 7,292,800 options were vested as of the re-pricing date.
Portal received a Nasdaq
staff determination letter, dated November 6, 2002, indicating that we have not met the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq National Market and that our common stock is therefore subject to de-listing from the Nasdaq
National Market. Portal has appealed this determination by requesting a hearing before a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications Panel to review the Staff Determination and a hearing has been set for December 19, 2002. During the hearing, Portal will present
a comprehensive plan to address the pending de-listing action. Portal has been advised that Nasdaq will not take any action to de-list its stock pending the conclusion of that hearing. The Nasdaq National Market may accept or deny the Companys
appeal.
14
ITEM 2:
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
Portal develops, markets and supports product-based customer management and
billing (CM&B) solutions for communications and content service providers. Our convergent platform enables service providers to deliver voice, data, video and content services with multiple networks, payment models, pricing plans and
value chains.
Beginning with fiscal year 1997, substantially all of our revenues have come from the license of
one product line, Infranet, and from related services. Revenues consist of Infranet license, professional services, support and maintenance fees. License revenues are comprised of perpetual or multiyear license fees, which are primarily derived from
contracts with communications service providers. Professional services consist of a broad range of implementation services, training, business consulting and operational support services. These services are provided throughout the customer
lifecycle. We believe that future revenues will be generated from three sources:
|
|
|
license fees from new customers; for new products to existing customers; and growth in the subscriber base of its existing customers, which will lead to
increased revenue from subscriber-based licenses. |
|
|
|
consulting services for the deployment of licenses and follow-on solutions related to our customers end to end billing needs; and
|
|
|
|
annual maintenance fees for the support of existing deployments and rights to access upgrade enhancements to our convergent platform
|
We have established a series of partnerships with systems integrators and hardware platform, software and
service providers. We have derived, and anticipate that we will continue to derive, a substantial portion of our revenues from customers that have significant relationships with our market and platform partners.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent
liabilities. On a regular basis, we evaluate and may revise our estimates, including those related to the allowance for bad debts, investments, intangible assets, income taxes, accrued restructuring expenses and contingencies. We base our estimates
on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue in accordance with current generally accepted accounting principles that have been prescribed for the software industry. Revenue recognition requirements are very complex and are affected by interpretations of
the rules and an understanding of industry practices, both of which are subject to change. Our revenue recognition policy is significant because our revenue is a key component of our results of operations. We follow very specific and detailed
guidelines in measuring revenue, several of which are discussed in Note 1 of the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements; however, certain judgments affect the application of our revenue recognition policy.
15
Our revenue recognition policy takes into consideration the creditworthiness of the customer in determining the
probability of collection as a criterion for revenue recognition. The determination of creditworthiness requires the exercise of judgment, which affects our revenue recognition. If a customer is deemed to not be creditworthy, all revenue under
arrangements with that customer is recognized upon receipt of cash. The creditworthiness of customers is re-assessed on a regular basis and revenue is deferred until cash receipt, if appropriate. Additionally, when Portal enters into contracts with
industry standard payment terms, it is Portals policy to recognize such revenue when the customer is deemed to be creditworthy and collection of the receivable is assured.
Portal periodically updates its revenue recognition policies to reflect changes in the marketplace, its business practices and experiences with its customers to ensure
compliance with revenue recognition rules and good business practices. During the quarter ended July 31, 2002 Portal revised its policy to better reflect industry practices and the shift in Portals customer base from Internet service providers
to Tier 1 telecommunications companies. The new policy continues to ensure compliance with technical pronouncements associated with software revenue recognition. Previously, Portals policy presumed that arrangements with payment terms
extending beyond 60 days did not meet the criteria for fixed and determinable fees. Under Portals revised policy, arrangements with payment terms extending beyond 60 days may meet the fixed and determinable fee criteria based upon
Portals evaluation of the risk of concession, subject to review and approval by Portals CFO. This change had no effect on revenue recognized during the quarter of the change. During the quarter ended October 31, 2002 Portal entered into
one transaction with multiple payment terms up to 90 days and Portal recognized approximately $0.2 million of license revenue as a result.
We also record a provision for estimated sales returns on product and service related sales in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. These estimates are based on historical sales returns, analysis of credit
memo data and other known factors. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect future returns, revenue could be overstated.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful
accounts is established through a charge to general and administrative expenses. This allowance is for estimated losses resulting from our customers failure or inability to make required payments. It is a significant estimate and is regularly
evaluated by us for adequacy by taking into consideration factors such as past experience, credit quality of the customer, age of the receivable balance, individually and in aggregate, and current economic conditions that may affect a
customers ability to pay. The use of different estimates or assumptions could produce different allowance balances. Our customer base is highly concentrated in the communications and content service provider industries. Several of the leading
companies in these industries have announced liquidity concerns. If collection is not probable at the time the transaction is consummated, we do not recognize revenue until cash is collected. If the financial condition of our customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
Accrued Restructuring Expenses
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002 and the
quarter ended July 31, 2002, we implemented plans to restructure the company that were a combination of reductions in workforce, consolidations of facilities and the write-off of assets. The restructuring charges were based on actual and estimated
costs incurred in connection with these restructuring plans. These estimates have been impacted by the rules governing the termination of employees, especially those in foreign countries. We have not recorded payments related to potential
settlements on disputed severance agreements, as these amounts are not reasonably estimable and probable. If, in the future, we were to agree upon additional severance payments, we would have to record additional restructuring charges in the period
in which the settlement was determined to be reasonably estimable and probable. We have reduced the amount of the facilities restructuring charge by the estimated amount of sublease income. The assumptions we have made are based on the current
market conditions in the various areas we have vacant space and necessarily entail a high level of management judgment. These market conditions can fluctuate greatly due to such factors as changes in property occupancy rates and the rental prices
charged for comparable properties. These changes could materially affect our
16
accrual. If, in future periods, it is determined that we have over accrued for restructuring charges for the consolidation of facilities, the reversal of such over accrual would have a favorable
impact on our financial statements in the period this was determined and would be recorded as a credit to restructuring costs. Conversely, if it is determined that our accrual is insufficient, an additional charge would have an unfavorable impact on
our financial statements in the period this was determined.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31,
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31,
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
(in millions; unaudited) |
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
License fees |
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
$ |
54.5 |
|
|
(40 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
(14 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
30.2 |
|
|
$ |
31.8 |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
$ |
90.0 |
|
|
$ |
121.1 |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License fees revenues increased immaterially for the three months
ended October 31, 2002 compared to the three months ended October 31, 2001. License fees revenues decreased in the nine months ended October 31, 2002 compared to the nine months ended October 31, 2001 due to a continued general economic slowdown
affecting the primary markets for our products and services, and in particular, capital spending by communications service providers. No customer accounted for more than 10% of revenues during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002. One
individual customer, AOL Time Warner, accounted for 23% and 18% of total revenues during the three and nine months ended October 31, 2001.
Services revenues decreased in the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002 from the comparable periods ended October 31, 2001 due to less consulting services and support revenue. Fewer new customer implementations have
resulted from the general decline in license sales over the past year and driven the decrease in consulting revenue. Support revenue has declined as a result of customer terminations that have not been fully replaced by new customer contracts.
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31,
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31,
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
(in millions; unaudited) |
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Geographical Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
|
$ |
17.3 |
|
|
(53 |
)% |
|
$ |
30.8 |
|
|
$ |
64.0 |
|
|
(52 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
107 |
% |
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
22 |
% |
Percentage of total revenues. |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
Intercontinental |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
(34 |
)% |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total international |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
4 |
% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
30.2 |
|
|
$ |
31.8 |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
$ |
90.0 |
|
|
$ |
121.1 |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American revenues, which are defined by us as revenues from
the United States and Canada, decreased primarily due to a continued global deferral of capital expenditures by telecommunications companies as well as a general economic slowdown. These are primarily the factors that have also adversely affected
our Intercontinental sales, although to a lesser degree than in North America. Our European revenues have increased as a result of
17
Portals change in strategy of focusing on Tier 1 service providers where license revenues are typically preceded by services and a general shift toward providing additional services.
Expenses
(in millions; unaudited) |
|
Three Months Ended October 31,
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31,
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Cost of license fees |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
(83 |
)% |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
(85 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
50.4 |
|
|
(35 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
Amortization and impairment of purchased developed technology and licenses |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
(43 |
)% |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
(36 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
(34 |
)% |
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
|
(41 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
(60 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
|
Cost of License Fees
Cost of license fees consists of resellers commission payments to systems integrators and third-party royalty obligations with
respect to third-party technology included in Infranet. The decreases in cost of license fees is primarily due to the decreases in revenue as a result of a continued general economic slowdown affecting the primary markets for our products and
services, and in particular, capital spending by communications service providers.
Cost of Services
Cost of services primarily consists of maintenance, consulting and training expenses. The decrease in cost of
services for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002 from the comparable periods ended October 31, 2001 is primarily due to a reduction in our services workforce to reflect the geographic realignment of consulting and support resources to
achieve efficiencies and produce higher gross margins. Gross margin for services was approximately 47% and 42% for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002, respectively compared to approximately 37% and 24% in the comparable periods ended
October 31, 2001.
Amortization and Impairment of Purchased Developed Technology and Licenses
In fiscal year 2000, we purchased third-party software for which certain functionality was integrated into our product. In the
current fiscal year, the depreciation of the license and the amortization of the support agreement have been reclassified from research and development expenses to amortization and impairment of purchased developed technology and licenses, a direct
cost of product license revenues. Due to our restructuring plan in July 2002, we re-assessed our need for this software and we decided to abandon it due to the elimination of the necessary resources. As a result we incurred a one-time charge of $1.4
million, in the quarter ended October 31, 2002, that has been included in this category.
18
In fiscal year 2001, we recorded an asset of $17.9 million for purchased developed technology as a result of acquiring
Solution42 and BayGate. Purchased developed technology was being amortized, on a straight-line basis, over the estimated useful life of the respective assets of three to four years. During fiscal 2002, we recorded charges of $2.5 million and $2.2
million to reflect the impairment of purchased developed technology related to our investments in BayGate and Solution42, respectively. As of January 31, 2002, purchased developed technology related to our investment in BayGate was fully expensed
due to a combination of impairment charges and amortization during fiscal 2002. Amortization of purchased developed technology, as related to Solution42, will continue to negatively impact our operating results in the future. Future amortization
expense of the remaining purchased developed technology related to our investment in Solution42 is currently estimated to be $2.7 million in fiscal year 2003, $2.7 million in fiscal year 2004 and $1.9 million in fiscal year 2005.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel and related costs for our development and technical support efforts. The decreases in research and
development expenses for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002 from the comparable periods ended October 31, 2001 were primarily due to a reduction in our workforce and facilities costs as a result of cost reduction programs. We have not
capitalized any software development costs to date.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist of personnel and related costs for our direct sales force, marketing staff and marketing programs,
including trade shows, advertising and costs associated with the recruitment of new and maintenance of existing strategic partnerships. The decreases in sales and marketing expenses for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002 from the
comparable periods ended October 31, 2001 were primarily due to a decrease in the number of sales and marketing personnel as a result of our restructuring plans initiated in fiscal 2002 and 2003.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related costs for general corporate functions, including finance, accounting, legal and human resources as well as facilities and
information system expenses not allocated to other departments. The decreases in general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002 from the comparable periods ended October 31, 2001 were primarily due to lower
bad debt reserves and a reduction in general and administrative personnel as a result of our restructuring plans initiated in fiscal 2002 and 2003.
Amortization of Deferred Stock Compensation
We recorded
deferred stock compensation of approximately $16.8 million in fiscal year 1999 in connection with stock options and restricted stock issued in and prior to 1999 and $0.2 million in fiscal year 2002, in connection with the acquisition of BayGate. The
deferred stock compensation reflects the difference between the exercise prices of options granted to acquire certain shares of common stock and the deemed fair value for financial reporting purposes of our common stock on their respective grant
dates. This compensation expense relates to options awarded to individuals in all operating expense categories. Total deferred compensation at October 31, 2002 of approximately $0.1 million is being amortized over the vesting periods of the options
on a graded vesting method. Amortization of deferred compensation is estimated to $0.3 million in fiscal year 2003.
19
The following table shows the amounts of deferred stock compensation that would have been recorded under the following
categories had deferred stock compensation not been separately stated on the statements of operations.
|
|
Three Months Ended October 31,
|
|
Nine Months Ended October 31,
|
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2001
|
(in thousands; unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services |
|
10 |
|
79 |
|
43 |
|
256 |
Research and development |
|
20 |
|
184 |
|
91 |
|
564 |
Sales and marketing |
|
18 |
|
142 |
|
77 |
|
461 |
General and administrative |
|
14 |
|
110 |
|
60 |
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
62 |
|
515 |
|
271 |
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Goodwill
We recorded goodwill in connection with our acquisition of Solution42 in fiscal year 2001. During fiscal year 2002, we recorded an
impairment of goodwill in the amount of $194.5 million. Goodwill was further reduced in fiscal 2002 by $3.5 million due to the reversal of excess accrued direct acquisition costs. As of January 31, 2002, there was no remaining balance in goodwill.
Reduction in Intangibles Due to Impairment
Long-lived assets and intangibles, including goodwill, are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. On an annual basis, the estimated future net cash flows associated with the asset are compared to the assets carrying amount to determine if impairment has occurred. If such assets were deemed impaired, an
impairment loss equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the assets is recognized. If quoted market prices for the assets are not available, the fair value is calculated using the present value of estimated expected
future net cash flows. The cash flow calculations are based on managements best estimates, using appropriate assumptions and projections at the time. During the quarter ended July 31, 2001, we recorded a charge of $193.4 million to reflect the
impairment of goodwill related to our investment in Solution42. Goodwill was further reduced in fiscal 2002 and as of January 31, 2002 there was no remaining balance in goodwill.
Restructuring Costs
In
fiscal 2002, our Board of Directors approved two plans to reduce our cost structure. The plans were a combination of a reduction in workforce, consolidations of facilities and asset write-offs. As a result of the first restructuring plan, we
incurred charges of $41.3 million in the period ended July 31, 2001. We incurred further restructuring charges related to our second plan in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002. The estimated costs of abandoning leased facilities, including
estimated costs to sublease were determined through assessment of market information trend analyses.
20
In July 2002, our Board of Directors approved and we began implementation of a
third plan to effect a change in our operations and cost structure to more fully align with our revised business strategy requiring a greater focus on the needs of Tier 1 telecommunications service providers. The plan includes a reduction in
workforce of approximately 250 employees, facilities reductions and asset write-offs. We recorded restructuring charges of $6.1 million and $30.7 million for the quarters ended July 31, 2002 and October 31, 2002, respectively. The restructuring
charges included approximately $6.2 million of severance related amounts, $17.4 million of committed excess facilities, primarily related to lease expenses net of anticipated sublease income, and $11.6 million in asset write-offs. Additionally, we
had integrated certain functionality of third-party software into our product. Due to the restructuring, we re-assessed our need for the software and abandoned it due to the elimination of related resources. We took an additional $1.4 million charge
in the quarter ended October 31, 2002 which has been included in the amortization and impairment of purchased developed technology and licenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. We plan to continue to make changes in our
business and strategy to address changes in our target markets and the overall economy and to implement additional cost reduction and efficiency programs.
Impairment of Assets
During the quarter ended October 31,
2002, we recorded charges of $1.5 million in impairment of assets related to computer equipment and software that were disposed of.
Write-down of Impaired Investments
We invest in equity instruments of privately
held companies for business and strategic purposes. These investments are included in other assets, in the amount of $1.5 million, net of allowance of $0.5 million, as of October 31, 2002 and 2001. The investments are accounted for using the cost
method as we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operations of these companies and our investment is less than 20% of the outstanding voting shares in each entity.
Portal monitors its investments for other than temporary impairment, basing its assessment on a review of the investees operations and other indicators. Other
indicators include, but are not limited to, limited capital resources, limited prospects of receiving additional financing and prospects for liquidity of the related securities. During the quarter ended July 31, 2001, we recorded a write-down of
$4.0 million related to other than temporary impairment of investments in privately held companies.
The remaining
$1.5 million was determined to not be impaired based upon a review of the companys financial statements. Even though the company is still generating losses, it has experienced growth in revenues and has continued to make concerted efforts to
reduce its cost structure. We will continue to monitor our investment in this company for signs of potential deterioration.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes totaled $0.8 million and $2.3
million in the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002, primarily as a result of foreign withholding taxes on revenue and tax on earnings generated from our foreign operations. Although the Company recorded a net loss of $40.6 million and $69.6
million for the three and nine months ended October 31, 2002, the foreign operations were profitable for tax purposes primarily due to the intercompany charge back arrangements necessary under the local tax laws.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments (including restricted investments of $17.5 million) totaled $75.7 million at October 31, 2002, compared to $128.9 million at January 31, 2002.
21
During the nine months ended October 31, 2002, we used $12.2 million in cash as
related to our restructuring plans. The total future cash outlay, for our restructuring plans, is currently estimated to be approximately $45.5 million that includes severance related costs as well as lease liabilities related to the consolidation
of facilities and is expected to be funded by available cash. Of the $45.5 million, lease payments for impacted facilities, net of expected sublease income, are expected to be $40.9 million through June 2006. As of October 31, 2002, the current
portion of accrued restructuring costs consists of $16.1 million in lease payments for impacted facilities, net of expected sublease income, $2.7 million in severance and $1.7 million in other restructuring related liabilities. Of the current
portion of net lease payments of $16.1 million approximately $6.5 million will be paid in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2003 and $3.2 million will be paid for each of the first three quarters of fiscal year 2004. Actual future cash requirements
may differ materially from the accrual at October 31, 2002, particularly if actual sublease income is significantly different from current estimates or if the company is successful in its efforts to renegotiate its facility leases. The foregoing
constitutes forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements for the reasons described below under the caption Risks Associated With Portals Business And Future
Operating Results.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $38.7 million for the nine months ended
October 31, 2002, a decrease of $1.1 million from the $39.8 million provided in the nine months ended October 31, 2001. Net cash provided by investing activities in the nine months ended October 31, 2002 was primarily comprised of the maturities of
short-term investments. During the nine months ended October 31, 2002, we also purchased computer equipment and software, made leasehold improvements and purchased other capital equipment amounting to approximately $5.1 million, primarily to support
our ongoing operations and information systems.
During the nine months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001, we raised
an additional $1.5 million and $7.4 million from sales of common stock issued from our employee stock purchase plans and upon the exercise of stock options by employees, net of repurchases.
In November 2000, we acquired Solution42. The liabilities assumed as part of the acquisition include four mortgages for two facilities
located in Germany. Two of the mortgages accrue interest at 4.45% per annum. Principal and interest are due in December 2010 and June 2011 on these two mortgages. As of October 31, 2002, the balances due on these loans were $0.6 million each. The
other two mortgages accrue interest at 5.10% and 4.88% per annum. Principal and interest payments are made on a monthly basis. These two mortgages are due in October 2015 and November 2024. As of October 31, 2002, the balances due were $0.2 million
each.
In the normal course of business, we entered into leases for new or expanded facilities in both domestic
and international locations. These leases are for terms expiring September 2002 through March 2021. In connection with our facility leases, we issued five letters of credit in lieu of a security deposit for the facilities (see Note 1 in Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). Subsequent to the quarter ended October 31, 2002, we negotiated the termination of some of our leases, the effects of which have been reflected in the restructuring accrual as of October 31,
2002. Under all our facilities lease agreements, including the newly negotiated agreements and net of sublease income of $3.9 million, we are obligated to make payments of approximately $16.7 million, $11.7 million, $11.8 million, $11.6 million and
$10.7 million in the years ending January 31, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively and a total of $63.2 million thereafter until expiration of the leases.
Due to the restructuring activities that occurred during fiscal 2002, several facilities were vacated or partially vacated. Some of these facilities have been subleased. We
are also attempting to sublease additional surplus facilities, in various locations, comprising a total of approximately 210,000 square feet. We are currently in the process of vacating additional facilities and attempting to negotiate cancellations
of leases or rent reductions wherever possible.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations,
including related interest charges and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future fiscal years. Of the $125.8 million in non-cancelable operating leases, net of sublease income, $40.9 million has been
included in accrued restructuring expenses as of October 31, 2002. In the less than one year category, $16.1 million of the non-cancelable leases has been accrued for in the current portion of restructuring expenses as of October 31, 2002.
22
(in thousands; unaudited): |
|
Total
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
Over 5 years
|
Long-term notes payable |
|
$ |
2,362 |
|
$ |
24 |
|
$ |
191 |
|
$ |
191 |
|
$ |
1,956 |
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
230 |
|
|
85 |
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cancelable operating leases, net of sublease income |
|
|
125,762 |
|
|
16,665 |
|
|
23,549 |
|
|
22,314 |
|
|
63,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
128,354 |
|
$ |
16,774 |
|
$ |
23,885 |
|
$ |
22,505 |
|
$ |
65,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes our other commitments as of October
31, 2002 and the effect such commitments could have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods if the letters of credit or the guarantees were drawn upon. Restricted investments represent the collateral for these commitments.
(in thousands; unaudited): |
|
Total
|
|
Less than 1 year
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
Over 5 years
|
Letters of credit |
|
$ |
12,830 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
12,575 |
Guarantees |
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,358 |
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
$ |
255 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
12,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including
market acceptance of our products, the resources we devote to developing, marketing, selling and supporting our products, our ability to sublease surplus facilities and other factors. We plan to continue to manage our quarterly operating costs such
that operating cash break-even, or better, results are maintained in the future. Although we believe that our current cash balances and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months, we may
require additional financing within this time frame. We may seek financing at any time that we determine market conditions are favorable. Additional funding, if needed, may cause dilution to our stockholders or the incurrence of debt and such
funding may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR BUSINESS AND FUTURE
OPERATING RESULTS
Our future operating results may vary substantially from period to period. The price of our
common stock will fluctuate in the future and an investment in our common stock is subject to a variety of risks, including but not limited to the specific risks identified below. Inevitably, some investors in our securities will experience gains
while others will experience losses depending on the prices at which they purchase and sell securities. Prospective and existing investors are strongly urged to carefully consider the various cautionary statements and risks set forth in this report.
This report contains forward-looking statements that are not historical facts but rather are based on current
expectations, estimates and projections about our business and industry, our beliefs and assumptions. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, believes, seeks,
estimates and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors,
many of which are beyond our control, and all of which are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include those
described in this section entitled Risks Associated With Portals Business and Future Operating Results and elsewhere in this report. Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or
false. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our managements view only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update these statements or publicly release the
results of any revisions to the forward-looking statements that we may make to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
23
OUR REVENUES WILL BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED AS A RESULT OF ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AFFECTING OUR TARGET
MARKETS
We primarily market our products and services to providers of communications and content
services. The substantial number of business failures and the decline in the market value of dot-com and other technology companies in the past few years has made it more difficult for emerging communication and electronic content
companies to obtain financing for their operations. Moreover, the market value, financial results and prospects of many large and established companies, including many large telecommunications companies, have also declined or degraded significantly.
Communications and content companies have continued to reduce or defer their purchases of software and related products and the introduction of many new communication services has been delayed or cancelled. Cancellations of existing or planned
services also adversely impact potential professional service, maintenance and support revenues. Any general decrease by our customers and potential customers in their rate of software and network investments results in a significant decrease in our
revenues and operating income. These trends in technology and software spending dramatically hurt our business in fiscal year 2002 and the first nine months of fiscal 2003 and will continue to seriously harm our business until conditions improve.
The current economic and capital spending downturn affecting our markets has made it increasingly difficult for
us to collect accounts receivable and increased the time required to collect them. A number of customers have ceased to operate or have become insolvent. Failure to collect accounts receivable in a timely manner has in the past and may continue to
result in increased write-offs, higher accounts receivable reserves and lower cash reserves that would adversely affect our financial results and available cash resources.
WE EXPECT TO INCUR ADDITIONAL LOSSES AND CANNOT BE CERTAIN THAT WE WILL BE PROFITABLE
In order to be profitable, we must increase our revenues or further reduce our expenses. We may not be able to increase or even maintain our revenues and we may not achieve sufficient revenues for
profitability in any future period. Moreover, we have already significantly reduced our expenses through a series of restructurings and there may be a limit to our ability to further reduce expenses without significantly damaging our operations. We
incurred net losses of approximately $395.5 million, $2.3 million and $7.6 million for fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. We expect to experience a net loss for the fourth quarter and fiscal year ending January 31, 2003. We recorded
substantial restructuring charges in fiscal year 2002 and in the quarters ended July 31, 2002 and October 31, 2002 in connection with a reduction in force and other expense reduction efforts initiated during the year.
If we do not generate increased revenues from sales of our products or reduce expenses, we will not be profitable. The decrease in capital
expenditures by communications companies as well as the general economic slowdown has adversely affected our revenues and will make it difficult to increase revenues until spending in our target markets increases. We also expect that we will face
increased competition that may make it more difficult to increase our revenues. Even if we are able to increase revenues, we have experienced and may continue to experience price competition that would lower our gross margins and our profitability.
Another factor that would lower our gross margins is any increase in the percentage of our revenues that is derived from indirect channels and from services, both of which have lower margins than our license revenues. Failure to achieve the desired
reductions in our expenses will further increase our losses. We cannot be certain that we will again achieve operating or net profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.
24
OUR QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE IN FUTURE PERIODS AND WE MAY FAIL TO MEET EXPECTATIONS
Our revenues and operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors. For example, we achieved
profitability in each of the first three quarters of fiscal year 2001 and have reported net losses in each of the last eight quarters. In future quarters, our operating results may be below the expectations of one or more public market analysts and
investors and the price of our common stock may fall. Failure by technology companies to meet or exceed analyst expectations or any resulting changes in analyst recommendations or ratings frequently results in substantial decreases in the market
value of the stock of such companies. For example, the market value of our stock decreased significantly after the release of our financial results for the quarters ended October 31, 2000 and April 30, 2001. Factors that could cause quarterly
fluctuations include:
|
|
|
variations in demand for our products and services, including decreases caused by reductions in technology spending within our target markets;
|
|
|
|
the timing and execution of individual contracts, particularly large contracts that would materially affect our operating results in a given quarter;
|
|
|
|
the timing of sales of our products and services; |
|
|
|
our ability to develop and attain market acceptance of enhancements to Infranet and new products and services; |
|
|
|
market acceptance of new communications services that our products are intended to support; |
|
|
|
delays in introducing new products and services; |
|
|
|
new product introductions by our competitors; |
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors; |
|
|
|
announcements of new versions of our products that cause customers to postpone purchases of our current products; |
|
|
|
the mix of products and services sold; |
|
|
|
the mix of sales channels through which our products and services are sold; |
|
|
|
the mix of domestic and international sales; |
|
|
|
costs related to acquisitions of technologies or businesses; |
|
|
|
the timing of releases of new versions of third-party software and hardware products that work with our products; |
|
|
|
our ability to attract, integrate, train, retain and motivate a substantial number of sales and marketing, research and development, technical support and other
management personnel with the needed competencies; |
|
|
|
our ability to sublease our excess real estate or renegotiate our leases |
|
|
|
global economic conditions generally, as well as those specific to providers of communications and content services. |
We have difficulty predicting the volume and timing of orders for new license transactions. In any given quarter, our sales have involved,
and we expect will continue to involve, large financial commitments from a relatively small number of customers. As a result, the cancellation or deferral of even a small number of licenses of Infranet would reduce our revenues, which would
adversely affect our quarterly financial performance. Also, we have often booked a large amount of our sales in the last month of the quarter and often in the last week of that
25
month. Accordingly, delays in the closing of sales near the end of a quarter could cause quarterly revenue to fall substantially short of anticipated levels. Furthermore, delays in the closing of
license transactions may result in a consequential delay or loss of services revenues relating to the projects for which the software would be licensed.
While a portion of our revenues each quarter is recognized from deferred revenue relating to previously signed contracts, our quarterly performance will depend primarily upon entering into new
contracts to generate revenues for that quarter. We may not be successful in entering into contracts with new or existing customers. New contracts that we enter into may not result in revenue in the quarter in which the contract is signed and we may
not be able to predict accurately when revenues from these contracts will be recognized.
We determine our
operating expenses largely on the basis of anticipated revenue trends and a high percentage of our expenses are fixed in the short and medium term. As a result, a failure or delay in generating or recognizing revenue could cause significant
variations in our operating results from quarter-to-quarter and could result in substantial operating losses.
OUR QUARTERLY
REVENUE IS GENERATED FROM A LIMITED NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS AND OUR CUSTOMER BASE IS CONCENTRATED AND THE LOSS OF ONE OR MORE OF OUR CUSTOMERS COULD CAUSE OUR BUSINESS TO SUFFER
A substantial portion of our license and services revenues in any given quarter has been, and is expected to continue to be, generated from a limited number of customers
with large financial commitments. For example, America Online accounted for more than 10% of our total revenues during each of the quarters of fiscal year 2002. As a result, if a large contract is cancelled or deferred or an anticipated contract
does not materialize, our business would be harmed. Our total revenues could also be adversely affected if revenues from a significant customer in one period are not replaced with revenues from that customer or other customers in subsequent periods.
For example, America Online did not account for 10% or more of our total revenues in the first three quarters of fiscal year 2003 because they have completed payment of the license fees for their initial order. In order to be successful, we will
have to replace these revenues. The communication and content industries we have targeted are consolidating, which could reduce the number of potential customers available to us. In addition, several large telecommunications companies have
significantly decreased their capital spending and have additional plans to further reduce spending, which has reduced orders of our products and may continue to do so. Moreover, many of our customers may have purchased sufficient quantities of our
products to satisfy their current or anticipated requirements. For all of these reasons our business could suffer in the future.
IT IS DIFFICULT TO PREDICT THE TIMING OF INDIVIDUAL ORDERS BECAUSE INFRANET HAS A LONG AND VARIABLE SALES CYCLE
To date, the sales cycle for Infranet generally has been three to nine months or more. Sales cycles have recently lengthened as the competitive environment has become more intense, the financial
position of our potential customers has weakened and price discounting has further delayed customer decision processes, as there is less business available from telecommunications companies. The long sales and implementation cycles for Infranet may
cause license revenues and operating results to vary significantly from period to period. Furthermore, the revenues derived from a sale may not be recognized immediately and could be spread over an extended period. Along with systems integrators and
our other distribution partners, we spend significant time educating and providing information to our prospective customers regarding the use and benefits of Infranet. Even after purchase, our customers tend to deploy Infranet slowly and
deliberately, depending on the specific technical capabilities of the customer, the size of the deployment, the complexity of the customers network environment and the quantity of hardware and the degree of hardware configuration necessary to
deploy Infranet.
26
THE MARKETS IN WHICH WE SELL OUR PRODUCT ARE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE AND WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO COMPETE EFFECTIVELY
We compete in markets that are intensely competitive and rapidly changing. We face competition from providers of customer
management and billing software, such as Amdocs Ltd., Convergys Corporation, CSG Systems International, Inc. and ADC Telecommunications Inc. We also compete with systems integrators and with internal information technology departments of larger
communications providers. Many of our current and future competitors have significantly more personnel and greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we have. We are aware of other companies that are focusing significant
resources on developing and marketing products and services that will compete with us. Furthermore, in recent years a number of our competitors have been acquired by companies larger than us who have sought to expand their CM&B solutions
capabilities. The failure of Portal to develop and market products and services that compete successfully with those of other suppliers in the market would harm our business. Portal anticipates that the market for its products and services will
remain intensely competitive.
Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies
and changes in customer requirements than we can. Also, current and potential competitors have greater name recognition and more extensive customer bases that they can use to compete more effectively. Increased competition could result in price
reductions, fewer customer orders, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could harm our business. Intense competition has recently been exemplified by deep price discounting by our competitors that has resulted in a
lengthening of our sales cycles and may threaten our ability to close forecasted business. Additionally, the financial strength of Portal or a competitor is becoming a factor in potential customers decisions.
OUR QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE IN FUTURE PERIODS DUE TO SEASONAL VARIATIONS AND WE MAY FAIL TO MEET EXPECTATIONS
We may also experience seasonality in our business. In many software companies, the rate of growth or absolute amount of
license fee revenues tends to decline from the fourth quarter of one year to the first quarter of the next year, due in part to the structure of sales compensation plans. Our revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2002 and 2003 was
significantly lower than the preceding fourth quarter. If we experience such seasonality in the future our rate of growth or absolute revenues could decline in the first quarter of a fiscal year compared to the preceding fourth quarter. Such
seasonality may cause our results of operations to fluctuate or become more difficult to predict and could cause us to fail to meet internal or analyst expected financial results.
OUR BUSINESS DEPENDS ON THE COMMERCIAL ACCEPTANCE OF OUR PRODUCTS AND IT IS UNCERTAIN TO WHAT EXTENT THE MARKET WILL ACCEPT THEM
Our future growth depends on the commercial success of our Infranet family of products. Substantially all of our license fees revenues are derived from our Infranet product
family. Our business will be harmed if our target customers do not adopt and purchase Infranet. Prospective customers may base their purchasing decisions on a vendors ability to support their customer management and billing needs for both
their new services and their other existing service offerings, such as fixed wire or mobile voice telephony or cable television. Our ability to address these current and future service requirements with our current version of Infranet and planned
future enhancements may affect the market acceptance of Infranet by prospective customers who desire an integrated customer management and billing solution for their different services. Our future financial performance will also depend on the
successful development, introduction and customer acceptance of new and enhanced versions of our products. We are not certain that our target customers will widely adopt and deploy Infranet as their customer management and billing solution. In the
future we may not be successful in marketing Infranet or any new or enhanced products or services. Our future revenues will also depend on our customers licensing software for additional applications or for additional subscribers. Their failure to
do so could harm our business.
27
Our customers deploy Infranet across a variety of computer hardware platforms and integrate it with a number of legacy
systems, third-party software applications and programming tools. Customers frequently use our professional services, third party system integrators or their own internal information technology organizations, or a combination thereof. Our ability to
generate and increase our professional services revenues will depend in large part on the number of new license transactions and on our ability to gain a significant portion of the services associated with the implementation of Infranet-related
projects. We are not certain that our target customers will widely adopt and use our professional services. In the future we may not be successful in marketing our services our failure to do so could harm our business.
The revenues we derive from our services business have a significantly lower margin than revenues derived from licensing Infranet.
Accordingly, the mix of license revenues and service revenues in any period will affect our operating margins for that period. Failure to meet analyst expectations for operating margins and profitability could cause a decrease in the market value of
our common stock.
OUR INABILITY TO SUBLEASE OR REDUCE SURPLUS OFFICE SPACE WOULD INCREASE OUR USE OF CASH AND OPERATING EXPENSES
AND ADVERSELY EFFECT OPERATING RESULTS AND OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION
We must periodically change our office
facilities in various locations as the number of existing and projected employees changes for those locations or as existing leases expire. Securing and building out facilities takes significant lead-time. Furthermore, because of the need to satisfy
projected future expansion, the amount of space we have leased is generally more than the amount currently required. Our significant office leases have terms of between 5 and 20 years. As a result, we frequently sublease the portions of leased
facilities that we have leased to meet our future expansion plans but do not currently need. In addition, our reductions in our workforce undertaken over the past year have substantially reduced our facilities requirements in several locations. As a
result, we are attempting to sublease the facilities that we have previously leased but do not currently need or to negotiate reductions in our rent obligations relating to those facilities or cancellations of the applicable leases. We have leased
approximately 235,870 square feet and 38,140 square feet for our regional headquarters facilities in Cupertino, California and Slough, United Kingdom, respectively, for terms of ten and twenty years, respectively. The amounts leased exceed our
current requirements and we plan to sublease a majority of the facilities for a substantial portion, if not the entire balance, of the lease term. There is currently a large amount of vacant commercial real estate in the San Francisco Bay Area and
in other locations where we have facilities. Moreover, currently prevailing rental rates in many locations are significantly lower than those that we are obligated to pay under the leases. We may therefore continue to encounter significant
difficulties or delays in subleasing our surplus space and may not be able to sublease it for rents equal to those that we are obligated to pay. In connection with our restructuring plan adopted in July 2002, we have vacated additional facilities in
the United States and in other locations.
To the extent that we are unable to renegotiate the terms or cancel the
applicable leases or to sublease this and other surplus space at an amount equal to our rent obligations for that space or to the extent sublessees fail to perform their obligations to pay rent, we could incur greater operating expenses than we
initially planned or included within accrued restructuring charges. Such increases in operating expenses in a period could cause us to exceed our planned expense levels and adversely affect our financial results for that period. Cancellation of
leases will likely result in use of significant amounts of cash and additional restructuring charges. Furthermore, inability to sublease such space may adversely affect our planned uses of cash and our capital resources. Moreover, we have reduced
the amount of the facilities restructuring charges we accrued in fiscal year 2002 by the estimated amount of sublease income. The assumptions we have made are based on the current market conditions in the various areas we have vacant space. These
market conditions can fluctuate greatly, thus causing our accrual to be inaccurate. If, in future periods, it is determined that we have over accrued for restructuring charges as related to the consolidation of facilities, the reversal of such over
accrual would have a favorable impact on our financial statements in the period this was determined. Conversely, if it is determined that our accrual is insufficient, an additional charge would have an unfavorable impact on our financial statements
in the period this was determined.
28
OUR BUSINESS WILL SUFFER DRAMATICALLY IF WE FAIL TO SUCCESSFULLY PLAN AND MANAGE CHANGES IN THE SIZE OF OUR OPERATIONS
Our ability to successfully offer our products and services in a rapidly evolving market requires an
effective planning and management process. We have experienced rapid changes in our number of employees in recent years. On October 31, 2002, we had 645 employees compared to 1,128 employees on October 31, 2001 and 1,515 employees on January 31,
2001. These changes have placed, and our anticipated future operations will continue to place, a significant strain on our management resources and our ability to train and allocate sufficient personnel resources to achieve our many objectives. We
expect that we will need to continue to improve our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems and procedures and will need to continue to recruit, train and manage our worldwide work force. We expect that we will have to change our
facilities in certain locations and we may face difficulties and significant expenses identifying and moving into suitable office space and subleasing or assigning any surplus space.
In addition, reduction in the number of employees can result in significant severance, administrative and legal expenses. Reductions in the number of personnel may also
adversely affect, or delay, various sales, marketing and product development programs and activities. This may increase the potential likelihood of other risks, such as delays in product introductions and reduce the effectiveness of general
administrative services. Our business will suffer dramatically if we fail to effectively manage changes in the size and scope of our operations.
WE MUST HIRE AND RETAIN QUALIFIED SALES PERSONNEL TO SELL OUR PRODUCTS
Our
financial success and our ability to increase revenues in the future depend considerably upon the productivity of our direct sales force that has historically generated a majority of our license revenues. This productivity will depend to a large
degree on our success in recruiting, training and retaining qualified direct salespeople. There is strong competition for direct sales personnel with the skills and expertise necessary to sell our products. Our business will be harmed if we fail to
hire or retain qualified sales personnel, or if newly hired salespeople fail to develop the necessary sales skills or develop these skills more slowly than we anticipate.
WE ALSO USE SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS AND OTHER STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS TO IMPLEMENT AND SELL INFRANET
We have entered into relationships with third-party systems integrators, as well as with hardware platform and software applications developers and service providers. We have derived, and anticipate
that we will continue to derive, a significant portion of our market opportunities and revenues from these relationships. We could lose sales opportunities if we fail to work effectively with these parties or fail to grow our base of market and
platform partners. We may also be at a serious competitive disadvantage if we fail to maintain and enhance these indirect sales channels. Many of these partners also work with competing software companies and our success will depend on their
willingness and ability to devote sufficient resources and efforts to marketing and resale of our products versus the products of others. We may not be able to enter into additional, or maintain our existing, strategic relationships on commercially
reasonable terms, or at all. Our agreements with these parties typically are in the form of nonexclusive referral fee or reseller agreements that are effective for a limited period of time and may be renewed only by mutual agreement of both parties.
Therefore, there is no guarantee that any single party will continue to market our products. If these relationships fail, we will have to devote substantially more resources to the distribution, sales and marketing, implementation and support of our
products than we would otherwise which would substantially increase our costs, and our efforts may not be as effective as those of our partners, either of which would harm our business.
29
OUR SIGNIFICANT INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS MAKE US MUCH MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TO RISKS FROM INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
For the nine months ended October 31, 2002 and 2001, we derived approximately 66% and 46% of our revenue, respectively, from
sales outside North America. As a result, we face risks from doing business on an international basis, including, among others:
|
|
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; |
|
|
|
licenses, tariffs and other trade barriers; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in the value of local currencies relative to the United States Dollar and greater difficulties in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations; |
|
|
|
longer sales and payment cycles; |
|
|
|
political and economic instability; |
|
|
|
seasonal reductions in business activity; |
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences; |
|
|
|
compliance with a wide variety of complex foreign laws and treaties; and |
|
|
|
variance and unexpected changes in local laws and regulations. |
We currently have offices in a number of foreign locations including Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Singapore, Spain,
South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan and the United Kingdom and may establish additional facilities in other parts of the world. Expansion of our existing international operations and entry into additional international markets will require significant
management attention and financial resources. We cannot be certain that our investments in establishing facilities in other countries will produce desired levels of revenue. In addition, we have sold Infranet internationally for only a few years and
we have limited experience in developing localized versions of Infranet and marketing and distributing them internationally.
Historically, we have typically denominated nearly all of our international license revenues in U.S. dollars. Because our foreign denominated revenues have been minimal, we have not engaged in currency hedging activities. Commencing
in fiscal year 2003, we denominated a larger number of international transactions in euros and certain other currencies (see also Impact of Foreign Currency Rate Changes in Item 3 below). In such event, we will face greater exposure to
adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations. In order to reduce the effect of
foreign currency fluctuations, we may hedge our exposure on certain transactional balances that are denominated in foreign currencies through the use of foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Failure to effectively hedge foreign currency
fluctuations would adversely affect our financial results.
To the extent that we are unable to successfully
manage our international business due to any of the foregoing factors, our business could be adversely affected.
OUR PROPRIETARY
RIGHTS MAY BE INADEQUATELY PROTECTED AND THERE IS A RISK OF INFRINGEMENT
Our success and ability to
compete depend substantially upon our internally developed technology, which we protect through a combination of patent, copyright, trade secret and trademark law. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may
attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology
30
or to develop products with the same functionality as our products. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent
misappropriation of our technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. Others may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our technology. Moreover,
as the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps, we expect that our software products may in the future become subject to third-party infringement claims. Some of our competitors in the market for customer management and
billing software may have filed or may intend to file patent applications covering aspects of their technology upon which they may claim our technology infringes. Any litigation, brought by us or by others, could be time-consuming and costly and
could divert the attention of our technical and management personnel. In addition, litigation could cause product shipment delays or require us to develop non-infringing technology or enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or
licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and could have a material and adverse impact on our gross margins and profitability. If a successful claim of product infringement were made against us, our
business could be significantly harmed.
OUR BUSINESS WILL SUFFER IF OUR SOFTWARE CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT ERRORS OR OUR PRODUCT
DEVELOPMENT IS DELAYED
We face possible claims and higher costs as a result of the complexity of our
products and the potential for undetected errors. Due to the mission critical nature of Infranet, undetected errors are of particular concern. Complex software, such as ours, always contains undetected errors. The implementation of
Infranet, which we accomplish through our services division and with our partners, typically involves working with sophisticated software, computing and communications systems. If we experience difficulties with an implementation or do not meet
project milestones in a timely manner, we could be obligated to devote more customer support, engineering and other resources to a particular project and to provide these services at reduced or no cost. If our software contains significant
undetected errors or we fail to meet our customers expectations or project milestones in a timely manner we could experience:
|
|
|
loss of or delay in revenues and loss of market share; |
|
|
|
failure to achieve market acceptance; |
|
|
|
diversion of development and implementation resources; |
|
|
|
injury to our reputation; |
|
|
|
increased service and warranty costs; |
|
|
|
legal actions by customers against us; and |
|
|
|
increased insurance costs. |
Our licenses with customers generally contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential product liability claims, such as disclaimers of warranties and limitations on liability for special, consequential and
incidental damages. In addition, our license agreements generally cap the amounts recoverable for damages to the amounts paid by the licensee to us for the product or service giving rise to the damages. However, these contractual limitations on
liability may not be enforceable, in certain jurisdictions and under certain circumstances, and we may be subject to claims based on errors in our software or mistakes in performing our services including claims relating to damages to our
customers internal systems. A product liability claim, whether or not successful, could harm our business by increasing our costs, damaging our reputation and distracting our management.
IF WE FAIL TO RELEASE PRODUCTS ON TIME, OUR BUSINESS WILL SUFFER.
In the past we have failed to release certain new products and upgrades on time. These delays may result in:
|
|
|
customer dissatisfaction; |
31
|
|
|
cancellation of orders and license agreements; |
|
|
|
slower market acceptance; or |
|
|
|
legal action by customers against us. |
Our business may be harmed if we are unable to develop, license or acquire new products or enhancements to Infranet on a timely and cost-effective basis, or if these products or enhancements are not
accepted by the market.
WE INCORPORATE SOFTWARE LICENSED FROM THIRD PARTIES INTO INFRANET AND ANY SIGNIFICANT INTERRUPTION IN THE
AVAILABILITY OF THESE THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE PRODUCTS OR DEFECTS IN THESE PRODUCTS COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS IN THE SHORT-TERM
Portions of Infranet incorporate software developed and maintained by third-party software vendors, such as operating systems, tools and database vendors. We expect that we may have to incorporate software from third party
vendors and developers to a larger degree in our future products. Any significant interruption in the availability of these third-party software products or defects in these products or future products could harm our sales unless and until we can
secure another source. We may not be able to replace the functionality provided by the third-party software currently offered with our products if that software becomes obsolete, defective or incompatible with future versions of our products or is
not adequately maintained or updated. The absence of, or any significant delay in, the replacement of that functionality could result in delayed or lost sales and increased costs and could harm our business in the short-term.
OUR FUTURE SUCCESS WILL DEPEND ON OUR ABILITY TO MANAGE TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE
The market for our products and the services they are used to support is characterized by:
|
|
|
rapid technological change; |
|
|
|
frequent new product introductions; |
|
|
|
changes in customer requirements; and |
|
|
|
evolving industry standards. |
Future versions of hardware and software platforms embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our products obsolete. Our future success will depend upon our ability to develop and
introduce a variety of new products and product enhancements to address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers.
Infranet is designed to work on a variety of hardware and software platforms used by our customers. However, Infranet may not operate correctly on evolving versions of hardware and software platforms, programming languages, database
environments, accounting and other systems that our customers use. We must constantly modify and improve our products to keep pace with changes made to these platforms and to back-office applications and other systems. This may result in uncertainty
relating to the timing and nature of new product announcements, introductions or modifications, which may harm our business. If we fail to modify or improve our products in response to evolving industry standards, our products could rapidly become
obsolete, which would harm our business.
32
OUR BUSINESS SUBSTANTIALLY DEPENDS UPON THE CONTINUED GROWTH OF COMMUNICATION AND CONTENT SERVICES
We sell our products to organizations providing new and emerging communications and content services provided over a variety of
communication networks including Internet, fixed line, wireless and satellite networks. Consequently, our future revenues and profits, if any, substantially depend upon the market acceptance and expanded use of services provided through the Internet
and other communication methods. A broad base of regular users of such services may not develop and the market may not accept recently introduced services and products that rely upon the adoption of such services, such as Infranet.
Many of the companies that are marketing broadband access to the Internet or are offering new services over the Internet,
wireless networks and other communication mediums are relatively new businesses. In the past several years, many so called dot.com companies have failed and financing for emerging Internet businesses has been increasingly more difficult
to obtain. We believe that the decline experienced in our North American operations since the third quarter of fiscal year 2001 is attributable in part to the difficulty experienced by several potential customers in receiving financing and a
consequential impact on their decisions to make investments in customer management and billing products and services. Moreover, the market value, financial results and prospects of many large and established companies, including many large
telecommunications companies, have also declined or degraded significantly. Emerging growth and established communications companies recently have been reducing or deferring their purchases of software and related products and the introduction of
many new communication services has been delayed or cancelled. This trend in technology and software spending has hurt and will continue to seriously harm our business until conditions improve. Any general decrease by our customers and potential
customers in their rate of software and network investments would result in a significant decrease in our revenues and operating income. To the extent that our customers and potential customers fail to achieve sustained profitability or obtain
adequate funding, we could experience greater risk and difficulty collecting receivables from those customers that do purchase our products and services which would in turn harm our business and financial results. The outlook for a recovery of the
telecommunications market has recently deteriorated such that a general recovery is now not expected for at least 18-24 months.
FUTURE REGULATION OF THE INTERNET OR NEXT GENERATION COMMUNICATION SERVICES MAY SLOW THEIR GROWTH, RESULTING IN DECREASED DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES AND INCREASED COSTS OF DOING BUSINESS
It is possible that state and federal regulators could adopt laws and regulations that may impose additional burdens on those
companies providing communications and content services. The growth and development of new services may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws or for imposition of additional taxes. The adoption of any additional laws or
regulations affecting communication services may slow their adoption or impose additional burdens on those companies providing such services. A decline in the growth of next generation communication services could decrease demand for our products
and services and increase our cost of doing business, or otherwise harm our business.
OUR FUTURE SUCCESS DEPENDS ON OUR ABILITY TO
ATTRACT AND RETAIN QUALIFIED PERSONNEL
Despite overall reductions in our total headcount, we will
continue to hire sales, support, marketing, administrative and research and development personnel during the remainder of fiscal 2003 and beyond. Competition for these individuals is intense and we may not be able to attract, assimilate or retain
highly qualified personnel in the future. Our business cannot succeed if we cannot attract qualified personnel. Our future success also depends upon the continued service of our executive officers and other key sales, marketing and support personnel
in general.
33
ACQUISITIONS OF ADDITIONAL COMPANIES OR TECHNOLOGIES MAY RESULT IN FURTHER DISRUPTIONS TO OUR
BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT DUE TO DIFFICULTIES IN ASSIMILATING PERSONNEL AND OPERATIONS
We may make
additional acquisitions or investments in other companies, products or technologies. If we make any acquisitions, we will be required to assimilate the operations, products and personnel of the acquired businesses and train, retain and motivate key
personnel from the acquired businesses. We may be unable to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies if we fail in these efforts. Similarly, acquisitions may cause disruptions in our operations and divert managements
attention from day-to-day operations, which could impair our relationships with our current employees, customers and strategic partners. The issuance of equity securities for any acquisition could be substantially dilutive to our stockholders. In
addition, our profitability may suffer because of acquisition-related costs or amortization costs for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets.
WE ARE CURRENTLY A PARTY TO SECURITIES LITIGATION CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS WHICH, IF DETERMINED ADVERSELY, COULD NEGATIVELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
On July 9, 2001, a purported class action complaint was filed in the Federal District Court Southern District of New York against Portal,
certain of its officers and several underwriters of the Companys initial public offering (IPO). The lawsuit alleges violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, arising from alleged improprieties by the underwriters in connection with our 1999 IPO and follow-on public offering, and claims to be on behalf of all persons who purchased Portal Software shares from May 5, 1999 through
December 6, 2000. Four additional nearly identical class actions were also filed in July and August 2001 based on essentially the same facts and allegations. Specifically, the complaints allege the underwriters charged certain of their customers
fees in excess of those disclosed in the prospectus and engaged in certain allegedly improper activities in connection with the distribution of the IPO shares. The complaint was subsequently amended to allege similar claims with respect our
secondary public offering in September 1999.
The cases have been consolidated into a single action, and a
consolidated complaint was filed on April 19, 2002. These actions are part of the IPO Securities Litigation against over 300 issuers and nearly 40 underwriters alleging claims virtually identical to those alleged against the Company. The action
seeks damages in an unspecified amount. A motion to dismiss addressing issues common to the companies and individuals who have been sued in these actions was filed on July 15, 2002.
An unfavorable resolution of these matters could materially affect our future results of operations or cash flows in a particular period. In addition, the litigation has
been, and may continue to be, time-consuming and costly and could divert the attention of our management personnel.
THE PRICE OF
OUR COMMON STOCK HAS BEEN AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE VOLATILE
The trading price of our common stock has
fluctuated significantly in the past and will continue to fluctuate in the future. For example the price of our common stock through October 31, 2002 has fluctuated between $83.93 and $0.21 per share. Future fluctuation could be a result of a number
of factors, many of which are outside our control. Some of these factors include:
|
|
|
quarter-to-quarter variations in our operating results; |
|
|
|
failure to meet the expectations of industry analysts; |
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates by us or by analysts; |
|
|
|
general conditions in the communications and content service industries; |
34
|
|
|
announcements and technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors; |
|
|
|
increased price competition; and |
|
|
|
developments or disputes concerning intellectual property rights. |
In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, which have particularly affected the market prices of many Internet and computer
software companies, including ours, and which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies or our company. Decreases in the trading prices of stocks of technology companies are often precipitous. For example, the price
of our stock dropped rapidly and significantly during the first quarter of fiscal year 2001, during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001 and during the first quarter of fiscal year 2002.
IF THE MARKET FOR OUR PRODUCTS DOES NOT IMPROVE, WE MAY BE FORCED TO INCUR RESTRUCTURING CHARGES IN ADDITION TO THE $71 MILLION CHARGE, THE $6.1 MILLION CHARGE AND THE $32.1 MILLION
CHARGE WE INCURRED IN THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2002, THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 2002 AND THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2002, RESPECTIVELY
During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002 and the quarters ended July 31, 2002 and October 31, 2002 we incurred charges of $71.0 million, $6.1 million and $32.1 million, respectively, in connection
with restructuring plans implemented to reduce our cost structure. These restructuring plans were implemented in response to the continued global deferral of capital expenditures by telecommunications companies, as well as the general downturn in
the economy. If the deterioration in the telecommunications and Internet industries continues and capital expenditures continue to be deferred or our business otherwise continues to suffer, we may implement additional restructuring plans to further
reduce our cost structure and incur additional restructuring charges. Any additional restructuring charges would have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS IN OUR CHARTER DOCUMENTS, STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN AND IN DELAWARE LAW COULD PREVENT OR DELAY A CHANGE IN CONTROL AND, AS A RESULT, NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR STOCKHOLDERS.
We have taken a number of actions that could have the effect of discouraging a takeover attempt. For
example, we have adopted a stockholder rights plan that would cause substantial dilution to a stockholder, and substantially increase the cost paid by a potential acquirer, who attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our board of directors.
This could prevent us from being acquired or reduce the price paid by any potential acquirer. In addition, our certificate of incorporation grants the board of directors the authority to fix the rights, preferences and privileges of and issue up to
4,000,000 shares of preferred stock without stockholder action. Although we have no present intention to issue shares of preferred stock, such an issuance could have the effect of making it more difficult and less attractive for a third party to
acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. Preferred stock may also have other rights, including economic rights senior to our common stock that could have a material adverse effect on the market value of our common stock. In addition, we
are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This section provides that except in certain limited circumstances a corporation shall not engage in any business combination with any interested
stockholder during the three-year period following the time that such stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. This provision could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of Portal.
WE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM NASDAQ STATING THAT IF WE ARE UNABLE TO COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM BID PRICE OF $1.00, OUR COMMON STOCK WILL BE DELISTED
We received a letter dated August 6, 2002, from the staff of the Nasdaq Stock Market, or Nasdaq, which
notified us that the bid price for our common stock had been below $1.00 per share for a period of thirty consecutive days. Nasdaq advised us that we would be given a period of ninety days within which to comply with the minimum
35
bid price requirement in order to maintain the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market. Because we were unable to demonstrate compliance with the minimum bid requirement for ten
consecutive days on or before November 4, 2002, Nasdaq provided us with written notification, on November 6, 2002, that our common stock would be de-listed. We requested and were granted an oral hearing with a Nasdaq Listing Qualification Panel to
appeal the staffs decision. De-listing has been stayed pending our hearing on December 19, 2002. We cannot assure you that our appeal of Nasdaqs determination will be successful. In the alternative, we may apply to transfer our
securities to the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. If we applied for transfer to the Small Cap Market and the transfer application was approved, we would have a 180 day grace period from meeting the Nasdaq Small Cap listing requirements and will be eligible
for an additional 180 day grace period if we meet the initial listing requirements for the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. We intend to pursue all available options to meet the Nasdaq listing requirements. If our common stock is de-listed from the Nasdaq
National Market, sales of our common stock would likely be conducted on the Small Cap Market or in the over-the-counter market, the pink sheets, or potentially on regional exchanges. This may have a negative impact on the liquidity and
price of our common stock and investors may find it more difficult to purchase or dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of, our common stock. See Item 5 below.
FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES OF COMPANIES WE HAVE INVESTED IN COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS
We have made investments in several companies and may make investments in others in the future. If at any time our investment in a company
were deemed impaired, we may be required to reduce the book value of that investment, which would in turn reduce our earnings in that period. Such investments could be deemed impaired, for example, if the financial condition of those companies
deteriorates. As of October 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, we had approximately $1.5 million (total investment of $2.0 million net of a valuation allowance of $0.5 million) invested in other companies. During fiscal 2002, we recorded a write-down
of $4.0 million related to other than temporary impairment of these investments. Because the financial condition of these companies is outside our control, we cannot predict if, or when, we would be required to reduce the value of such
investments.
36
ITEM 3:
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The following discussion
about Portals risk management activities includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements for the reasons
described under the caption Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations Risks Associated With Portals Business And Future Operating Results.
Short-Term Investment Portfolio
We do not hold derivative financial instruments in our short-term investment portfolio. Our short-term investments consist of instruments rated the equivalent of Standard & Poors and Moodys short-term rating A1/P1 or
long-term rating of at least A/A2. Our policy dictates that we diversify our holdings, limit our short-term investments to a maximum of $5 million to any one issuer and that all short-term investments mature in 24 months or less.
The following table presents the amounts of cash equivalents and investments that are subject to market risk and the weighted
average interest rates, by year of expected maturity for Portals investment portfolios as of October 31, 2002. This table does not include cash because cash is not subject to market risk. It also does not include long-term investments as they
are held to maturity. Therefore, near-term changes in market rates will not result in losses. (In thousands, except weighted average yields):
|
|
Maturing Within 1 Year
|
|
|
Maturing Within 2 Years
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
11,214 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
11,214 |
|
Weighted Average Yield |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.80 |
% |
Investments |
|
|
22,157 |
|
|
|
11,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,088 |
|
Weighted Average Yield |
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Portfolio |
|
$ |
33,371 |
|
|
$ |
11,931 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
45,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Yield |
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
2.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
2.20 |
% |
Impact of Foreign Currency Rate Changes
Because we translate foreign currencies into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes, currency fluctuations can have an impact, though
generally immaterial, on our results. Historically, our exposure to currency exchange fluctuation risk has been insignificant primarily due to the denomination of nearly all of our sales transactions in U.S. dollars. Beginning in fiscal year 2003,
we started to denominate certain sales transactions in foreign currencies that have increased our exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a
material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations.
In order to reduce the effect of
foreign currency fluctuations, we may hedge our exposure on certain transactional balances that are denominated in foreign currencies through the use of foreign currency forward exchange contracts. The success of such activity will depend upon the
estimation of future transactions denominated in various currencies. To the extent that these estimates are overstated or understated during periods of currency volatility, we could experience unanticipated currency gains or losses. To date, we have
not engaged in foreign currency hedging.
37
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On July 9, 2001, a purported class action complaint was filed in the
Federal District Court Southern District of New York against Portal, certain of its officers and several underwriters of the Companys initial public offering (IPO). The lawsuit alleges violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, arising from alleged improprieties by the underwriters in connection with our 1999 IPO and follow-on public offering, and claims to be on behalf of all persons
who purchased Portal Software shares from May 5, 1999 through December 6, 2000. Four additional nearly identical class actions were also filed in July and August 2001 based on essentially the same facts and allegations. Specifically, the complaints
allege the underwriters charged certain of their customers fees in excess of those disclosed in the prospectus and engaged in certain allegedly improper activities in connection with the distribution of the IPO shares. The complaint was subsequently
amended to allege similar claims with respect our secondary public offering in September 1999.
The cases have
been consolidated into a single action, and a consolidated complaint was filed on April 19, 2002. These actions are part of the IPO Securities Litigation against over 300 issuers and nearly 40 underwriters alleging claims virtually identical to
those alleged against the Company. The action seeks damages in an unspecified amount. A motion to dismiss addressing issues common to the companies and individuals who have been sued in these actions was filed on July 15, 2002.
In the opinion of management, resolution of this litigation is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial
position of Portal. However, depending on the amount and timing, an unfavorable resolution of these matters could materially affect our future results of operations or cash flows in a particular period.
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Based on their evaluation as of a date within 90 days of the
filing date of this quarterly report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act), are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
There have been no significant changes in our internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Requirements for Continued Listing on the Nasdaq National Market
Our common stock must gain and then maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share in order to remain eligible for continued
listing on the Nasdaq National Market. We received a letter dated August 6, 2002, from the staff of Nasdaq that notified us that the bid price for our common stock had been below $1.00 per share for a period of thirty consecutive days. Nasdaq
advised us that we would be given a period of ninety days within which to comply with the minimum bid price requirement for at least ten consecutive trading days in order to maintain listing on the Nasdaq National Market.
We were unable to comply with the minimum bid requirement before November 4, 2002 and Nasdaq provided us with written notification, on
November 6, 2002, that our common stock would be de-listed. We requested and were granted an oral hearing with a Nasdaq Listing Qualification Panel to appeal Nasdaqs decision. De-listing has
38
been stayed pending our hearing on December 19, 2002. We cannot assure you that our appeal of Nasdaqs determination will be successful. In the alternative, we may apply to transfer our
securities to the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. If we applied for transfer to the Small Cap Market and the transfer application was approved, we would have a 180 day grace period from meeting the Nasdaq Small Cap listing requirements and would be
eligible for an additional 180 day grace period if we meet the initial listing requirements for the Nasdaq Small Cap Market. We intend to pursue all available options to meet the Nasdaq listing requirements.
In addition to the $1.00 minimum bid price per share requirement described above, we must also comply with the other quantitative and
qualitative requirements set forth in the Nasdaq National Market Listing Requirements in order to maintain the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market. In particular, companies currently included in the Nasdaq National Market must
meet each of the following standards:
|
1. |
|
At least $10,000,000 in stockholders equity; |
|
2. |
|
a public float of at least 750,000 shares; |
|
3. |
|
a market value of public float of at least $5,000,000; |
|
4. |
|
a minimum bid price of $1 per share; |
|
5. |
|
at least 400 round lot shareholders; |
|
6. |
|
at least two market makers; and |
|
7. |
|
compliance with Nasdaq corporate governance rules. |
In the event we are unable to satisfy the requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq National Market, we may not be able to satisfy the requirements for listing on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market on
an ongoing basis. The requirements for continued listing on the Nasdaq Small Cap Market are listed below:
|
1. |
|
either (a) at least $2,500,000 in stockholders equity, (b) net income in two of the last three years of at least $500,000, or (c) a market capitalization
of at least $35,000,000; |
|
2. |
|
a public float of at least 500,000 shares; |
|
3. |
|
a market value of public float of at least $1,000,000; |
|
4. |
|
a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share; |
|
5. |
|
at least two market makers; |
|
6. |
|
at least 300 round lot shareholders; and |
|
7. |
|
compliance with Nasdaq corporate governance rules. |
We believe that maintaining the listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market is in our best interest and in the best interest of our stockholders. Inclusion in the Nasdaq National Market
increases liquidity and may potentially minimize the spread between the bid and asked prices quoted by market makers. Further, a Nasdaq National Market listing may enhance our access to capital and increase our flexibility in
responding to anticipated capital requirements. We believe that prospective investors will view an investment in our common stock more favorably if our shares qualify for listing on the Nasdaq National Market.
We also believe that the current per share price level of our common stock has reduced the effective marketability of our shares of common
stock because of the reluctance of many leading brokerage firms to recommend low-priced stock to their clients. Certain investors view low-priced stock as speculative and unattractive. In addition, a variety of brokerage house policies and practices
tend to discourage individual brokers within those firms from dealing in low-priced stock. Such policies and practices pertain to the payment of brokers commissions and to time-consuming procedures that make the handling of low-priced stocks
unattractive to brokers from an economic standpoint.
In addition, if our common stock is not listed on the Nasdaq
National Market and the trading price of our common stock were to remain below $1.00 per share, trading in our common stock would also be subject to certain rules under the Exchange Act which require additional disclosures by broker-dealers in
connection with any trades involving a stock defined as a penny stock (generally, a non-Nasdaq equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions). In such event, the additional burdens
imposed upon broker-
39
dealers to effect transactions in our common stock could make the handling of common stock less attractive, further limiting the market liquidity of our common stock and the ability of investors
to trade our common stock.
In addition, because brokerage commissions on low-priced stock generally represent a
higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher-priced stock, the current share price of the common stock can result in individual stockholders paying transaction costs (commissions, markups or markdowns) that represent a higher
percentage of their total share value than would be the case if the share price were higher. This factor also may limit the willingness of institutions and other investors to purchase our common stock at its current low share price.
If our common stock is de-listed from the Nasdaq National Market, we may not qualify for listing on the Nasdaq Small Cap
Market. In such an event, sales of our common stock would likely be conducted only in the over-the-counter market, the pink sheets, or potentially on regional exchanges. This may have a negative impact on the liquidity and price of our
common stock and investors may find it more difficult to purchase or dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the market value of, our common stock. Furthermore, if our common stock is not listed on the Nasdaq National Market, we will not
be eligible for certain exemptions from the various state securities or blue sky laws, which would make it more difficult and expensive for us to raise capital through issuances of securities.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of the Security Holders
A notice of a matter to be submitted to a vote by a shareholder at the 2002 meeting must be received a reasonable time before the Company mails its proxy materials for that year in order
for the matter to be deemed timely.
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
|
10.1 |
|
Severance Agreement and General Release of all Claims dated November 11, 2002 between Michael Regan and Portal
Software, Inc. |
|
99.1 |
|
Periodic Report Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
On August 20, 2002, Portal filed a report on Form 8-K which disclosed that on August 16, 2002, Portals
Board of Directors adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan designed to deter coercive takeover tactics.
On November 14, 2002, Portal filed a report on Form 8-K which disclosed that on November 6, Nasdaq provided us with written notification that our common stock would be de-listed.
40
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
December 16, 2002 |
|
|
|
PORTAL SOFTWARE, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ HOWARD A. BAIN
III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howard A. Bain III Chief
Financial Officer (On behalf of the Registrant and as the Principal Financial Officer) |
41
CERTIFICATIONS
I, John E. Little, Chief Executive Officer of Portal Software, Inc., hereby certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Portal Software, Inc.; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
|
c) |
|
Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and audit committee
of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and |
6. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
|
|
December 16, 2002 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ JOHN E.
LITTLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John E. Little Chief Executive
Officer |
42
I, Howard A. Bain III, Chief Financial Officer of Portal
Software, Inc., hereby certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Portal Software, Inc.; |
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to me us others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
|
b) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report; and |
|
c) |
|
Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and audit committee
of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and |
6. |
|
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
|
|
December 16, 2002 |
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ HOWARD A. BAIN
III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howard A. Bain III Chief
Financial Officer |
43