EXTREME NETWORKS INC - 10-Q Quarterly Report

	September 30, 2002			June 30, 2002
	(Unaudited)			(Note 2)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	84,109		$	71,830
Short-term investments		139,025			164,667
Accounts receivable, net		39,755			51,344
Inventories, net		34,198			24,627
Deferred taxes		42,890			42,882
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10,835			13,126

Total current assets		350,812			368,476
Property and equipment, net		97,907			99,551
Marketable securities		185,593			163,560
Goodwill		1,021			1,021
Deferred taxes		92,875			90,617
Other assets		12,252			12,526

TOTAL ASSETS	$	740,460		$	735,751

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	35,951		$	29,215
Accrued compensation and benefits		13,050			12,082
Restructuring liabilities		21,741			23,421
Accrued purchase commitments		5,008			8,063
Accrued warranty		12,104			9,055
Deferred revenue		45,187			40,772
Other accrued liabilities		18,239			23,913

Total current liabilities		151,280			146,521
Long-term deposit		272			272
Convertible subordinated notes		200,000			200,000
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock and capital in excess of par value		655,489			653,547
Deferred stock compensation		(8,166	)		(10,167	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		2,589			1,851
Accumulated deficit		(261,004	)		(256,273	)

Total stockholders’ equity		388,908			388,958

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	740,460		$	735,751

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2002			2001
Net revenue	$	100,569		$	108,289
Cost and expenses:
Cost of revenue		51,499			83,312
Sales, marketing and service		33,253			36,985
Research and development		14,509			16,411
General and administrative		6,935			8,113
Amortization of deferred stock compensation		2,001			2,873
Amortization of goodwill		—			10,646
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		—			1,207

Total costs and expenses		108,197			159,547

Operating loss		(7,628	)		(51,258	)
Loss on investments		—			(6,000	)
Other income, net		880			2,422

Loss before income taxes		(6,748	)		(54,836	)
Benefit for income taxes		(2,017	)		(18,828	)

Net loss	$	(4,731	)	$	(36,008	)

Net loss per share—basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.32	)

Shares used in per share calculation—basic and diluted		114,420			111,953

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2002			2001
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(4,731	)	$	(36,008	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		8,652			7,747
Amortization of goodwill		—			10,646
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		—			1,207
Provision for doubtful accounts		—			2,700
Provision for inventory		—			5,000
Deferred income taxes		(2,266	)		(19,857	)
Amortization of deferred stock compensation		2,001			2,873
Write-down of investments		—			6,000
Compensation expense for options granted to consultants		—			210
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		11,589			8,434
Inventories		(9,571	)		3,945
Prepaid expenses and other current and noncurrent assets		2,565			1,604
Accounts payable		6,736			14,340
Accrued compensation and benefits		968			(1,783	)
Restructuring liabilities		(1,680	)		—
Accrued purchase commitments		(3,055	)		(426	)
Accrued warranty		3,049			3,236
Deferred revenue		4,415			5,323
Other accrued liabilities		(5,674	)		2,461

Net cash provided by operating activities		12,998			17,652

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(7,008	)		(8,462	)
Purchases and maturities of investments, net		4,347			22,558

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(2,661	)		14,096

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,942			3,864

Net cash provided by financing activities		1,942			3,864

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		12,279			35,612
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		71,830			87,722

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	84,109		$	123,334

Extreme Networks, Inc. (“Extreme Networks” or the “Company) is a leading provider of network infrastructure equipment. Extreme Networks markets its products primarily to business, governmental and educational customers with a focus on large corporate enterprises and metropolitan service providers. Extreme Networks was incorporated in California in 1996 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1999.

Extreme Networks’ fiscal year is a 52/53-week fiscal accounting year that closes on the Sunday closest to June 30^th every year. Fiscal 2003 and 2002 are 52-week fiscal years. The September 30, 2002 quarter closed on September 29, 2002 and comprised 13 weeks of revenue and expense activity. All references herein to “fiscal 2003” or “2003” represent the year ending June 29, 2003.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Extreme Networks have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2002 was derived from audited financial statements as of that date but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. These interim financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with Extreme Networks’ audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Extreme Networks’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.

The unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, consisting only of normal recurring accruals necessary to a fair presentation of the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented and the financial condition of Extreme Networks at September 30, 2002. The results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for future quarters or the fiscal year ending June 30, 2003.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Extreme Networks and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Investments in which management intends to maintain more than a temporary 20% to 50% interest, or otherwise has the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method. Investments in which Extreme Networks owns less than a 20% interest and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence are carried at the lower of cost or estimated realizable value.

Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated to United States dollars at current rates of exchange, and revenues and expenses are translated using weighted-average rates. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses during the interim periods reported have not been significant. Gains and losses from foreign currency translation are included as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss).

Highly liquid investment securities with insignificant interest rate risk and with original maturities of three months or less at date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. Investment securities with original maturities greater than three months and remaining maturities of less than one year are classified as short-term investments. Investment securities with remaining

To date, all marketable securities have been classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, when material, reported net-of-tax as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are included in other income, net. The cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. Premiums and discounts are amortized over the period from acquisition to maturity and are included in investment income, along with interest and dividends.

Extreme Networks has certain other minority investments in privately held companies. These investments are included in other assets on the balance sheet and are carried at cost. Extreme Networks monitors these investments for other than temporary impairment and makes appropriate reductions in carrying values when necessary. Extreme Networks did not record any write-downs of its privately held investments for the three months ended September 30, 2002. Extreme Networks recorded write-downs of $6.0 million related to impairments of its privately held investments for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Investments in privately held companies with a carrying value of $0.2 million remained as of September 30, 2002.

The carrying amounts of certain of Extreme Networks financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, approximate fair value because of their short maturities. The fair values of investments are determined using quoted market prices for those securities or similar financial instruments. The fair value of the convertible subordinated notes due 2006 is estimated using quoted market prices.

Extreme Networks may be subject to concentration of credit risk as a result of certain financial instruments consisting principally of marketable investments and accounts receivable. Extreme Networks has placed its investments with high-credit quality issuers. Extreme Networks will not invest an amount exceeding 10% of the corporation’s combined cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable securities in the securities of any one obligor or maker, except for obligations of the United States government, obligations of United States government agencies and money market accounts. Extreme Networks performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and does not require collateral in exchange for credit. Extreme Networks endeavors to keep pace with the networking industry by adopting credit policies and standards in view of assessable risks.

In regard to customer concentration, one distributor of Extreme Networks’ products and one end-user customer accounted for 15% and 11% of Extreme Networks’ net revenue, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2002. One distributor of Extreme Networks’ products and one end-user customer accounted for 18% and 11% of Extreme Networks’ net revenue, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2001.

Extreme Networks derives the majority of its revenue from sales of its stackable and chassis-based networking equipment, with the remaining revenue generated from service fees relating to the maintenance and installation of, and training on, its products. Extreme Networks’ revenue recognition policy follows SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. Extreme Networks generally recognizes product revenue from end-user and reseller customers at the time of shipment, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price of the product is fixed or determinable and collection of the sales proceeds is reasonably assured. When significant obligations or contingencies remain after products are delivered, such as installation or customer acceptance, revenue and related costs are deferred until such obligations or contingencies are satisfied. Revenue from service obligations under maintenance contracts

Extreme Networks makes certain sales to partners in two-tier distribution channels. The first tier consists of a limited number of independent distributors that sell primarily to resellers and, on occasion, to end-user customers. Under specified conditions, Extreme Networks grants the right to these distributors to return a portion of unsold inventory to it for the purpose of stock rotation. Therefore, Extreme Networks defers the recognition of revenue on sales to distributors until the distributors sell the product, as evidenced by a monthly sales-out report that the distributors provide to Extreme Networks. The second tier of the distribution channel consists of a large number of third-party resellers that sell directly to end-users and are not granted return privileges, except for defective products.

Extreme Networks’ hardware warranty period is typically 12 months from the date of shipment to end users and 14 months from the date of shipment to channel partners, which include resellers and distributors. Upon shipment of products to its customers, including both end users and channel partners, Extreme Networks estimates expenses for the cost to repair or replace products that may be returned under warranty and accrues the amount as revenue is recognized. The determination of warranty requirements is based on actual historical experience with the product or product family, the frequency of new product introductions and product upgrades anticipated during the period, estimates of repair and replacement costs and any product warranty problems that are identified after shipment. Extreme Networks adjusts these accruals at each balance sheet date in accordance with changes in these factors.

Extreme Networks operates in one segment, the development and marketing of network infrastructure equipment. Extreme Networks conducts business globally and is managed geographically. Revenue is attributed to a geographical area based on the location of the customers. Extreme Networks does not allocate cost of revenue, research and development, sales, marketing and service, or general and administrative expenses to its geographic areas or measure the performance of geographic areas based on allocation of these costs and expenses. Management does not believe that allocating these expenses is significant in evaluating Extreme Networks performance on a geographic basis.

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”). SFAS 142 requires goodwill to be tested for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances, and written down when impaired, rather than being amortized as previous standards required. Furthermore, SFAS 142 requires purchased intangible assets other than goodwill to be amortized over their useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. Extreme Networks adopted this statement beginning July 1, 2002. In accordance with SFAS 142, Extreme Networks ceased amortizing goodwill as of July 1, 2002. Goodwill at July 1, 2002 was $1.0 million.

	Year Ended June 30,									Three Months Ended September 30,
	2002			2001			2000			2002			2001
Net income (loss)—as reported	$	(183,962	)	$	(68,883	)	$	20,048		$	(4,731	)	$	(36,008	)
Adjustments:
Amortization of goodwill		33,546			28,862			5,593			—			10,646
Income tax effect		(11,741	)		(10,102	)		(1,958	)		—			(3,726	)

Net adjustments		21,805			18,760			3,635			—			6,920

Net income (loss)—adjusted	$	(162,157	)	$	(50,123	)	$	23,683		$	(4,731	)	$	(29,088	)

Basic net income (loss) per share—as reported	$	(1.63	)	$	(0.64	)	$	0.20		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.32	)

Diluted net income (loss) per share—as reported	$	(1.63	)	$	(0.64	)	$	0.18		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.32	)

Basic net income (loss) per share—adjusted	$	(1.44	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.24		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.26	)

Basic net income (loss) per share—adjusted	$	(1.44	)	$	(0.46	)	$	0.21		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.26	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, less shares subject to repurchase, and excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants, convertible subordinated notes and convertible securities. Dilutive earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares used in the basic earnings (loss) per share calculation plus the dilutive effect of options, warrants, convertible subordinated notes and convertible securities. Diluted net loss per share was the same as basic net loss per share for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 because Extreme Networks had net losses for those periods. If Extreme Networks had been profitable during these periods, diluted earnings per share would have been reduced by the calculated effect of outstanding stock options of 2,328,000 and 4,701,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively, and warrants of 3,000,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001. The computation of diluted net loss per share for the three months ended September 30, 2002 also excludes the impact of the conversion of convertible subordinated notes due in December 2006, which were convertible into 5.6 million shares of common stock as of September 30, 2002, as such impact would be antidilutive for this period.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2002			2001
Net loss	$	(4,731	)	$	(36,008	)

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding		115,247			113,714
Less: Weighted-average shares subject to repurchase		(827	)		(1,761	)

Weighted-average shares used in per share calculation—basic		114,420			111,953
Incremental shares from outstanding stock options using the treasury stock method		—			—

Weighted-average shares used in per share calculation—diluted		114,420			111,953

Net loss per share—basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.32	)

Extreme Networks uses derivative financial instruments to manage exposures to foreign currency. Extreme Networks’ objective for holding derivatives is to use the most effective methods to minimize the impact of these exposures. Extreme Networks does not enter into foreign exchange forward contracts for speculative or trading purposes. All derivatives, whether designated in hedging relationships or not, are required to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. For a derivative designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss is recognized in other expense in the period of change together with the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributed to the risk being hedged. For a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into other expense upon occurrence of the forecasted transaction. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in other expense immediately.

Extreme Networks’ exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations arises in part from intercompany accounts between the parent company in the United States and its foreign subsidiaries. These intercompany accounts are typically denominated in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary in order to centralize foreign exchange risk with the parent company in the United States. Extreme Networks is also exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as the financial results of foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars for consolidation purposes. As exchange rates vary, these results, when translated, may vary from expectations and may adversely impact overall financial results.

Extreme Networks has a program to reduce the effect of foreign exchange transaction gains and losses from recorded foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. This program involves the use of foreign exchange forward contracts in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. A foreign exchange forward contract obligates Extreme Networks to exchange predetermined amounts of specified foreign currencies at specified exchange rates on specified dates or to make an equivalent United States dollar payment equal to the value of such exchange. Under this program, increases or decreases in Extreme Networks’ foreign currency transactions are substantially offset by gains and losses on the forward contracts, so as to mitigate the possibility of significant foreign currency transaction gains and losses.

Extreme Networks enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate the effect of gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities denominated in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. These derivatives are not designated as hedges under SFAS 133. At September 30, 2002, these exposures amounted to $1.1 million and were partially offset by foreign currency forward contracts with a notional principal amount of $1.1 million (fair value of approximately $68,000). These contracts were traded in the last fiscal month of the quarter and have a final maturity of less than 45 days.

Extreme Networks also uses foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge foreign currency forecasted transactions related to certain operating expenses, denominated in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. At September 30, 2002, these exposures amounted to $6.3 million and were partially offset by forward foreign currency contracts with a notional principal amount of $6.3 million (fair value of approximately $1,400). These contracts were traded in the last week of the quarter and have a final maturity of less than 60 days.

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are used for, but are not limited to, accounting for the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, depreciation and amortization, impairment of purchased intangible assets and minority investments, sales returns, warranty accruals and income taxes. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”), which superseded SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed of (“SFAS 121”). Although retaining many of the fundamental recognition and measurement provisions of SFAS 121, the new rules significantly change the criteria that would have to be met to classify an asset as held-for-sale. The statement also supersedes certain provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, and requires expected future operating losses from discontinued operations to be displayed in discontinued operations in the period or periods in which the losses are incurred rather than as of the measurement date, as previously required. Extreme Networks adopted SFAS 144 on July 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 144 did not have a material impact on Extreme Networks’ consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2002.

SFAS 144 requires that long-lived assets be tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Factors that could trigger an impairment review include significant under-performance relative to the expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use of the assets, significant negative industry or economic trends and significant changes in Extreme Networks’ market capitalization relative to net book value. In the event of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, Extreme Networks will test such assets for a potential impairment. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to dispose of the affected assets.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (“SFAS 146”). SFAS 146 requires that a liability for costs associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS addresses costs associated with restructuring activities that are currently accounted for under Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (Including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The scope of SFAS 146 also covers termination benefits that employees who are involuntarily terminated receive under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement, costs related to terminating a contract that is not a capital lease and costs to consolidate facilities. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. Extreme Networks does not expect the adoption of SFAS 146 to have a material impact on its operating results or financial position.

In November 2001, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 01-09, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer or a Reseller of the Vendor’s Products (“EITF 01-09”), which addresses the accounting for consideration given by a vendor to a customer. Extreme Networks has evaluated the impact of EITF 01-09 and believes its adoption will not have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. Extreme Networks adopted EITF 01-09 during fiscal 2002.

On January 1, 2002, Extreme Networks adopted the consensus of EITF Issue No. 01-14, Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for ‘Out-of-Pocket’ Expenses Incurred (“EITF 01-14”). EITF 01-14 requires that reimbursements received for out-of-pocket expenses be reflected as revenues and prior period financial statements be reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Prior to the adoption of EITF 01-14, reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses were reflected as a reduction to “Cost of Revenue.” The impact upon revenue and cost of revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2002 was not material. EITF 01-14 will have no impact on Extreme Networks’ gross margin or net income (loss), but will increase its net revenue and cost of revenue.

During fiscal 2001, Extreme Networks acquired two privately held companies in which it previously held minority interests: Optranet, Inc. (“Optranet”), a developer of broadband access equipment, and Webstacks, Inc. (“Webstacks”), a developer of content switching equipment. A related party of Extreme Networks was a significant investor in Optranet at the time of Extreme Networks’ initial investment and the subsequent acquisition. In addition, a related party of Extreme Networks was a significant investor in Webstacks at the time of Extreme Networks’ initial investment and the subsequent acquisition. In connection with these acquisitions, Extreme Networks acquired all of the outstanding stock and assumed all of the outstanding stock options of the respective acquirees. Both acquisitions were accounted for as purchase business combinations.

Extreme Networks recognized deferred stock-based compensation associated with unvested stock options issued to employees that were assumed in conjunction with the acquisition of Optranet and Webstacks. This amount is included as a component of stockholders’ equity and is being amortized ratably by charges to operations over the vesting period of the options. The amortization of stock-based compensation associated with the acquisition of Optranet was $1.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, and amortization of stock-based compensation associated with the acquisition of Webstacks was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. The amortization of stock-based compensation relates to options awarded to employees in research and development.

Extreme Networks has entered into a revolving line of credit for $10.0 million with a major lending institution. Borrowings under this line of credit bear interest at the bank’s prime rate. As of September 30, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under this line of credit. The line of credit contains a provision for the issuance of letters of credit not to exceed the unused balance of the line. As of September 30, 2002, Extreme Networks had letters of credit totaling $1.7 million. The line of credit requires Extreme Networks to maintain specified financial covenants related to tangible net worth and liquidity with which Extreme Networks was in compliance as of September 30, 2002. The line of credit expires on November 30, 2002.

In June 2000, Extreme Networks entered into two operating lease agreements for approximately 16 acres of land and the accompanying 275,000 square feet of buildings to house its primary facility in Santa Clara, California (the “Property”). The two lease agreements provided Extreme Networks with the option to purchase the Property at any time during the lease term and required the purchase at the end of the lease term. In April 2002, Extreme Networks exercised the option to purchase the Property and title to the Property was transferred to it in May 2002. Extreme Networks was obligated to pay a total of $80.0 million for the Property. As part of the original lease transactions, $80.0 million of Extreme Networks’ investment securities served as collateral for specified obligations under the lease agreements. Extreme Networks transferred the $80.0 million of investment securities held as security for the lease obligations to the lessor as payment for the Property.

At the time of exercise of the option to purchase the Property, the appraised value of the land and buildings was $38.0 million. Extreme Networks recognized a charge, net of a $3.0 million improvement allowance, of $39.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. The land and buildings are included on Extreme Networks’ consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2002 and June 30, 2002.

Beginning on July 6, 2001, multiple purported securities fraud class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The cases were consolidated and the litigation is now captioned as In re Extreme Networks, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, Civ. No. 01-6143 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.), related to In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.).

6, 2000. It names as defendants Extreme Networks; six of the its present and former officers; and several investment banking firms that served as underwriters of Extreme Networks’ initial public offering and October 1999 secondary offering. Subsequently, plaintiffs and one of the individual defendants stipulated to a dismissal of that defendant without prejudice. The complaint alleges liability under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on the grounds that the registration statement for the offerings did not disclose that: (1) the underwriters had agreed to allow certain customers to purchase shares in the offerings in exchange for excess commissions paid to the underwriters; and (2) the underwriters had arranged for certain customers to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at predetermined prices. The Securities Act of 1933 allegations against Extreme Networks and its officers are made as to the secondary offering only. The amended complaint also alleges that false analyst reports were issued. No specific damages are claimed.

Extreme Networks is aware that similar allegations have been made in other lawsuits filed in the Southern District of New York challenging over 300 other initial public offerings and secondary offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000. On July 15, 2002, Extreme Networks (and the other issuer defendants) filed a motion to dismiss. That motion was heard on November 1, 2002. Extreme Networks cannot assure you that it will prevail in the lawsuit. Failure to prevail could have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the future.

On March 14, 2001, Nortel Networks, Inc. and Nortel Networks Limited (collectively, “Nortel”) filed suit against Extreme Networks in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Civil Action No. 01-10443EFH (the “Case”). The complaint alleged willful infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,790,554; 5,490,252; 5,408,469; 5,398,245; 5,159,595 and 4,736,363, and sought, among other findings, a judgment against Extreme Networks for infringement of the six patents, which allegations Extreme Networks vigorously opposed. Following limited pre-trial discovery and negotiation, Extreme Networks and Nortel agreed on September 17, 2002 to a settlement of all claims. As part of the settlement, the parties agreed to a prospective five-year cross-license with respect to the patents covering technologies that were at issue in the Case. The Case was dismissed with prejudice on September 20, 2002.

Extreme Networks is subject to other legal proceedings, claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on Extreme Networks’ consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

A $39.0 million charge was taken in the third quarter of fiscal 2002 related to two leases Extreme Networks entered into in June 2000, as described in Note 4 under the heading “Leases.” The appraised value of the Property was $38.0 million. Extreme Networks recognized a charge, net of a $3.0 million improvement allowance, of $39.0 million. Extreme Networks exercised the option to purchase the leased properties on May 7, 2002 for an aggregate of $80.0 million. Extreme Networks transferred the $80.0 million of investment securities held as security for the lease obligations to the lessor as payment for the Property.

Excess facilities charges for fiscal 2002 were $25.4 million. These costs are the result of Extreme Networks’ decision to permanently reduce occupancy or vacate certain domestic and international facilities. The estimated facilities costs are based on current comparable rates for leases in the respective markets or estimated termination fees. The actual cost could differ from this estimate, and additional facilities charges could be incurred, if Extreme Networks is unsuccessful in negotiating affordable termination fees on certain facilities, if facility operating lease rental rates continue to decrease in these markets, if it takes longer than expected to find a suitable tenant to sublease these facilities, or if other estimates and assumptions change. Extreme Networks anticipates that it will continue to make cash outlays to meet lease obligations for these facilities through 2011, unless estimates and assumptions change or Extreme Networks is able to negotiate to terminate the leases prior to 2011.

As a result of the rapid change in the market for networking products, Extreme Networks recorded $7.6 million and $39.2 million in charges for excess and obsolete inventory and non-cancelable purchase commitments in fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. The following is a summary of these charges and their disposition from the third quarter of fiscal 2001 to September 30, 2002 (in thousands):

	Inventory Allowance			Inventory Benefit Realized
Initial additional excess inventory charge third quarter of fiscal 2001	$	39,205		$	—
Additional excess inventory charge first quarter of fiscal 2002		5,000			—

		44,205

Usage:
Inventory scrapped		(14,746	)		—
Sale of inventory		(5,154	)		4,776
Inventory utilized		(893	)		—
Settlement of purchase commitments		(14,162	)		—

		(34,955	)	$	4,776

Remaining balance as of September 30, 2002	$	9,250

Optranet’s products were originally targeted at the building local exchange carrier (“BLEC”) and multi-tenant unit (“MTU”) markets. It was believed that, by incorporating Optranet’s technology into Extreme Networks’ Alpine product family, Extreme Networks would be able to expand its presence in customer networks and give metropolitan service providers an advanced Ethernet service-provisioning platform for Ethernet access over several transport systems. Extreme Networks believed it would be able to exploit the synergies and growth opportunities of Optranet’s in-process products due to their complementary nature to its strategy and compatibility with its products. However, following the acquisition date, demand for Optranet’s products fell sharply as the majority of Optranet’s targeted customers either entered into bankruptcy or dissolved. Based on industry analysis, the BLEC and MTU markets are not expected to recover in the next few years, and in the event that a recovery eventually occurs, BLEC and MTU service providers will likely require different solutions. As of the impairment valuation date of March 31, 2002, the Optranet products were repositioned to address the remote and branch office access needs of enterprise customers. However, this secondary market has also slowed due to decreased information technology spending and has largely been addressed by competing products based on legacy technologies.

Webstacks’ products were originally targeted at the e-business and hosting facility markets. Extreme Networks acquired Webstacks in an effort to expand Extreme Networks’ IP services to provide robust Layer 4 ~ Layer 7 switching solutions required for building high-performance content aware networks. Extreme Networks believed it would be able to exploit the growth opportunities of Webstacks’ products by complementing its Layer 3 product focus with high-end Layer 4 ~ Layer 7 networking devices. However, demand for higher-cost Layer 4 ~ Layer 7 switches in these markets did not materialize, largely due to worsening economic conditions. E-business customers continued to rely on slower speed networking devices and host facilities have not yet grown to a scale that necessitates data transfer at gigabit speeds. As of the impairment valuation date of March 31, 2002, the Webstacks products were repositioned to address enterprise data center needs, including security products. Although this market has slowed since the acquisition date, based on industry analysis, Extreme Networks believes there continues to be potential for moderate growth in this market.

Based on the foregoing impairment factors, Extreme Networks worked with valuation experts to perform asset impairment tests at the lowest operational level that had separately identifiable cash flows related to the Webstacks and Optranet intangible assets and goodwill. The tests were performed by comparing the expected undiscounted cash flows over 57-month periods for each of Webstacks and Optranet to the carrying amount of the long-lived assets resulting from the acquisitions. Extreme Networks found that the sum of the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the Webstacks and Optranet intangible assets and goodwill was less than their carrying value and thus it needed to record an impairment loss. The impairment loss was measured as the amount by which the carrying values of such assets exceeded their fair value. The fair value was calculated based on analyses of the discounted future cash flows for each of Webstacks and Optranet. In performing these analyses, Extreme Networks used the best information available under the circumstances, including reasonable and supportable assumptions and projections of future operating results. The discount rates used in the analyses were 20% for each of Webstacks and Optranet, which were based on historical risk premiums that investors required for companies of Extreme Networks’ size, industry and capital structure and included risk factors specific to the sectors in which the two companies operated. These amounts are based on management’s best estimate of future results. As a result of this analysis, Extreme Networks recorded a charge to reduce goodwill and purchased intangible assets by $89.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2002. A total of $1.0 million of carrying value of goodwill remained as of June 30, 2002.

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including the following sections, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, particularly statements relating to our expectations regarding results of operations, product demand and revenue, cash flows, product gross margins, our expectations to continue to develop new products and enhance existing products, our expectations regarding the amount of research and development expenses, our expectations relating to selling, general and administrative expenses, our efforts to achieve additional operating efficiencies and to review and improve our business systems and cost structure, our expectations to continue investing in technology, resources and infrastructure, our expectations concerning the availability of products from suppliers and contract manufacturers, anticipated product costs and sales prices, our expected effective income tax rate, our expectations that we have sufficient capital to meet our requirements for at least the next twelve months, our expectations regarding the rationalization of our workforce and facilities, and our expectations regarding materials and inventory management. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and the cautionary statements set forth below and those contained in the section entitled “Risk Factors” identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted in any such forward-looking statements. We caution investors that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risk factors identified in this Form 10-Q and other filings we have made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period reported. By their nature, these estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, market trends and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the critical accounting policies stated below, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

We derive the majority of our revenue from sales of our stackable and chassis-based networking equipment, with the remaining revenue generated from service fees relating to the maintenance and installation of, and training on, our products. Our revenue recognition policy follows SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. We generally recognize product revenue from our end-user and reseller customers at the time of shipment, provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price of the product is fixed or determinable and collection of the sales proceeds is reasonably assured. When significant obligations or contingencies remain after products are delivered, such as installation or customer acceptance, revenue and related costs are deferred until such obligations or contingencies are satisfied. Revenue from service obligations under maintenance contracts is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual period, which is typically 12 months. When we provide a combination of products and services to customers, revenue is allocated based on relative fair values.

We make certain sales to partners in two-tier distribution channels. The first tier consists of a limited number of independent distributors that sell primarily to resellers and, on occasion, to end-user customers. Under specified conditions, we grant the right to these distributors to return a portion of unsold inventory to us for the purpose of stock rotation. Therefore, we defer recognition of revenue on sales to distributors until the distributors sell the product, as evidenced by a monthly sales-out report that each distributor provides us. The second tier of the distribution channel consists of a large number of third-party resellers that sell directly to end-users and are not granted return privileges, except for defective products.

We provide an allowance for sales returns based on our historical returns; analysis of credit memo data and our return policies. The allowance is netted against net revenue in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. If the historical data used by us to calculate the estimated sales returns and allowances does not properly reflect future levels of product returns, these estimates would have to be modified, thus resulting in an impact to net revenue.

date, which includes a review of, among other factors, demand requirements, product lifecycle and product development plans and quality issues. Based on this analysis, we record adjustments, when appropriate, to reflect inventory at net realizable value. In recent quarters, demand for our products has been adversely affected by the downturn in the global economy and reduced telecommunications and infrastructure capital spending, particularly in the United States. Although we make every effort to ensure the accuracy of our forecasts of product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments would significantly impact the value of our inventory and our reported operating results. In the future, if we find that our estimates are too optimistic and we determine that our inventory needs to be written down, we will be required to recognize such costs in our cost of revenue at the time of such determination. Conversely, if we find our estimates are too pessimistic and we subsequently sell product that has previously been written down, our operating margin in that period will be unusually favorable.

Networking products can contain undetected software or hardware errors when new products or new versions or updates of existing products are released to the marketplace. We have experienced such errors in connection with products and product upgrades. Our hardware warranty period is typically 12 months from the date of shipment to end users and 14 months from the date of shipment to channel partners, which include resellers and distributors. Upon shipment of products to our customers, including both end users and channel partners, we estimate expenses for the cost to repair or replace products that may be returned under warranty and accrue the amount as revenue is recognized. Our determination of our warranty requirements is based on our actual historical experience with the product or product family, the frequency of new product introductions and product upgrades anticipated during the period, estimates of repair and replacement costs, and any product warranty problems that are identified after shipment. We adjust these accruals at each balance sheet date in accordance with changes in these factors. While we believe that our warranty accrual is adequate and that the judgment applied in calculating this accrual is appropriate, the assumptions used are based on estimates and estimated amounts could differ materially from our actual warranty expenses in the future.

We continually monitor and evaluate the collectibility of our trade receivables based on a combination of factors. We record specific allowances for bad debts in general and administrative expense when we become aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation to us, such as in the case of bankruptcy filings or deterioration of financial position. Estimates are used in determining our allowances for all other customers based on factors such as current trends in the length of time the receivables are past due and historical collection experience. We mitigate some collection risk by requiring most of our customers in the Asia-Pacific region, excluding Japan, to pay cash in advance or secure letters of credit when placing an order with us. During the year ended June 30, 2002, we increased our allowance for doubtful accounts, reflecting the adverse economic conditions affecting our customer base. While we believe that our current allowance for doubtful accounts receivable is appropriate, a change in the financial condition of specific customers may result in further adjustment to our estimates of the recoverability of receivables.

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Significant management judgment is required in determining our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We make an assessment of the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income, and to the extent that recovery is not believed to be likely, a valuation allowance is established. For fiscal 2002 and 2001, we did not record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets because we believed the amount was more likely than not to be realized. In the event that we are unable to realize some or all of the deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets will be charged to income in the period such determination is made.

We currently have arrangements with three contract manufacturers for the manufacture of our products. Our arrangements allow them to procure long lead-time component inventory on our behalf based upon a rolling production forecast provided by us. We are obligated to the purchase of long lead-time component inventory that our contract manufacturers procure in accordance with the forecast, unless we give notice of order cancellation outside of applicable component lead-times. As of September 30, 2002, we were committed to purchase approximately $1.0 million of such inventory over the next four months. If actual demand for our products is below these projections, we may have excess inventory as a result of our purchase commitments of long lead-time components with our contract manufacturers. As a consequence, we may then need to record a charge to cost of revenue to reflect the impact of such excess purchase commitments.

We assess the carrying value of long-lived assets, which includes property and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets and deferred taxes, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of these long-lived assets may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include significant under-performance relative to the expected historical or projected future operating results; significant changes in the manner of use of the assets; significant negative industry or economic trends and significant changes in Extreme Networks’ market capitalization relative to net book value. In the event of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we would test such assets for a potential impairment. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to dispose of the affected assets.

We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings. Periodically, we review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Because of uncertainties related to these matters, accruals, if any, are based only on the most current and dependable information available at any given time. As additional information becomes available, we may reassess the potential liability from pending claims and litigation and the probability of claims being successfully asserted against us. As a result, we may revise our estimates related to these pending claims and litigation. Such revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows in the future. For further detail, see Note 4 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of legal proceedings.

Net revenue. Net revenue decreased from $108.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $100.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $7.7 million. This decrease resulted from unfavorable global economic conditions and reduced levels of information technology-related capital spending compared with a year ago. Net service revenue was $9.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and $5.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001.

For the three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, sales to customers outside of the United States accounted for approximately 59% and 70% of our net revenue, respectively. Sales in the United States for the three months ended September 30, 2001 were adversely affected as a result of the events of September 11, 2001. We expect that export sales will continue to represent a significant portion of net revenue, although export sales may decline as a percentage of net revenue. All sales transactions are currently denominated in United States dollars.

During fiscal 2002, the United States economy experienced a rapid and increasingly severe downturn. This adversely affected demand for our products and made it increasingly difficult to accurately forecast future production requirements. Our revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was adversely impacted by the continuing weakness and uncertainty in the economies of the United States and other industrialized countries. While we expect this economic downturn to continue for the remainder of calendar year 2002, we cannot predict the extent, severity or length of this economic downturn in the United States or in the other geographic regions where we currently sell our products. As a result of the revenue decline in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we are undertaking expense reduction efforts in the second quarter.

We are experiencing some erosion of average selling prices of our products due to a number of factors, including competitive pricing pressures, promotional pricing and rapid technological change. Our revenue is derived primarily from sales of our Summit, BlackDiamond and Alpine product families and fees for services relating to the installation and maintenance of, and training on, our products. The level of sales to any customer may vary from period to period; however, we expect that significant customer concentration will continue for the foreseeable future. One distributor of our products and one end-user customer accounted for 15% and 11% of our net revenue, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2002. One distributor of our products and one end-user customer accounted for 18% and 11% of our net revenue, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2001.

Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue includes costs of raw materials, direct labor, manufacturing overhead and amounts paid to third-party contract manufacturers, and other costs related to warranty and contractual obligations. Net revenue less cost of revenue (gross profit) increased from $25.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $49.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, an increase of $24.1 million. Gross margin (gross profit as a percentage of net

revenue) increased from 23.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to 48.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2002. These increases in both the gross profit and the gross margin were primarily due to a one-time $31.4 million charge in the three months ended September 30, 2001 related to our outsourced manufacturing activities, including a charge for leased equipment with one contract manufacturer as described below and the stocking of our service depots on a worldwide basis with inventory intended to meet customer support demands under contract. The gross margin in the three months ended September 30, 2002 relative to the three months ended September 30, 2001 was adversely affected by a significant increase in warranty expense. During the three months ended September 30, 2002, we experienced a higher than normal rate of warranty expenses due to problems with various component parts within our products and our election, in some cases, to address these matters by replacing defective products with new products rather than refurbished replacements. We are in the process of implementing operational changes that are designed to reduce these expenses in the future, however, our gross margin will continue to be adversely affected until these new this processes are fully implemented.

Inventory purchases and commitments are based upon our forecast of future sales. To mitigate the component supply constraints that have existed in the past during fiscal 2001, we built inventory levels for certain components with long lead times and entered into long-term commitments with our suppliers for certain components. Due to a sudden and significant decrease in demand for our products that became apparent in the third quarter of fiscal 2001, inventory levels, including non-cancelable purchase commitments, exceeded our requirements based on our forecast of expected demand. The $31.4 million additional excess inventory charge was calculated based on the inventory levels in excess of our forecast of expected demand for each product. Based on our then determined future demand forecast, we did not, and we currently do not, anticipate that the excess inventory subject to these provisions will be used at a later date. Furthermore, we may be required to take additional write-downs in the future related to excess inventory.

Our gross margin is variable and dependent on many factors, some of which are outside of our control. Some of the primary factors affecting gross margin include demand for our products, changes in our pricing policies and those of our competitors, and the mix of products sold. Our gross margin may be adversely affected by increases in material or labor costs, increases in warranty expense, heightened price competition, obsolescence charges and higher inventory balances. In addition, our gross margin may fluctuate due to the mix of distribution channels through which our products are sold, including the effects of our two-tier distribution model. Any significant decline in sales to our resellers, distributors or end-user customers, or the loss of any of our key resellers, distributors or end-user customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, an increase in distribution channels generally makes it more difficult to forecast the mix of products sold and the timing of orders from our customers. New product introductions may result in excess or obsolete inventories, which may also reduce our gross margin. Furthermore, if we are not able to reduce product or related warranty costs in future quarters, gross margin would continue to be adversely affected.

Cost of revenue includes the cost of our manufacturing overhead. We outsource the majority of our manufacturing and supply chain management operations, and we conduct quality assurance, manufacturing engineering, document control and repairs at our facility in Santa Clara, California. Accordingly, a significant portion of our cost of revenue consists of payments to our contract manufacturers: Flextronics International, Ltd., Plexus Corp. and Solectron Corporation. As part of our business relationship with MCMS, Inc., the predecessor-in-interest to Plexus Corp., in September 2000, we entered into a $9.0 million operating equipment lease for manufacturing equipment with a third-party financing company; we, in turn, subleased the equipment to MCMS. Due to the liquidity problems at MCMS and its voluntary bankruptcy filing for protection under Chapter 11 on September 18, 2001, we recorded a charge of $9.0 million related to the equipment lease in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. On January 8, 2002, MCMS completed an agreement to sell a majority of its assets to Plexus Corp. for $45.0 million.

Sales, marketing and service expenses. Sales, marketing and service expenses consist of salaries, commissions and related expenses for personnel engaged in marketing, sales and customer support and service functions, as well as trade shows and promotional expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased from $37.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $33.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $3.7 million. This decrease was primarily due to decreased payroll and related personnel expenses due to reduced headcount in sales and reduced spending for marketing programs and consultant fees. The rate of future spending increases in our sales, marketing and service expenses, if any, will depend on the pace of recovery in the market for networking products.

Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses consist principally of salaries and related personnel expenses, consultant fees and prototype expenses related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products. Research and development expenses decreased from $16.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $14.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $1.9 million. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in prototype costs. We expense all research and development expenses as incurred. We believe that continued investment in research and development is critical to attaining our strategic objectives and as a result we expect these expenses will continue to be significant in future periods.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for executive, finance and administrative personnel, professional fees and other general corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased from $8.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $1.2 million. This decrease was primarily due to a $2.7 million charge in the three months ended September 30, 2001 for bad debt expense, partially offset by increases in professional fees and insurance expense in the three months ended September 30, 2002. The rate of future spending increases in our general and administrative expenses, if any, will depend on the pace of recovery in the market for networking products.

Amortization of deferred stock compensation. Amortization of deferred stock compensation decreased from $2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, a decrease of $0.9 million. Amortization of deferred stock compensation is attributable to unvested stock options issued to employees that we assumed in conjunction with the acquisitions of Optranet and Webstacks and is being amortized ratably by charges to operations over the vesting period of the options.

Amortization of goodwill and purchased intangible assets. We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS 142”), as of July 1, 2002. SFAS 142 requires that goodwill and certain other intangible assets will no longer be amortized and will instead be tested for impairment at least annually and written down only when impaired. Accordingly, as of July 1, 2002, we stopped amortizing goodwill of $1.0 million. The cessation of amortization reduced amortization of goodwill and amortization of purchased intangible assets by $10.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 as compared with the three months ended September 30, 2001.

Income taxes. We recorded a tax benefit of $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002. The benefit for the three months ended September 30, 2002 results in an effective tax rate of 30%, which differs from the statutory rate primarily due to the impact of research and experimentation credits and the tax impact of foreign operations. SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not. We intend to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.

Cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable securities increased from $400.1 million at June 30, 2002 to $408.7 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $8.6 million. This increase was primarily due to cash provided by operating activities of $13.0 million and proceeds from issuance of common stock of $1.9 million, partially offset by capital expenditures of $7.0 million.

We generated $13.0 million in cash from operations in the three months ended September 30, 2002 despite a net loss of $4.7 million. The net loss included non-cash charges, offset somewhat by the effect of deferred taxes. Accounts receivable decreased from $51.3 million at June 30, 2002 to $39.8 million at September 30, 2002. Days sales outstanding in receivables decreased to 36 days at September 30, 2002 from 41 days at June 30, 2002. The decreases in accounts receivable and days sales outstanding were primarily due to shipment linearity and improved collections performance. Inventory levels increased from $24.6 million at June 30, 2002 to $34.2 million at September 30, 2002. Inventory management remains an area of focus as we balance the need to maintain strategic inventory levels to ensure competitive lead times and avoid stock-outs with the

In June 2000, we entered into two operating lease agreements for approximately 16 acres of land and the accompanying 275,000 square feet of buildings to house our main campus in Santa Clara, California (the “Property”). The two lease agreements provided us with the option to purchase the Property at any time during the lease term and required the purchase at the end of the lease term. In April 2002, we exercised our option to purchase the Property for $80.0 million using our investment securities previously held as collateral to fund the purchase.

We have a revolving line of credit for $10.0 million with Silicon Valley Bank. As of September 30, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility. The line of credit contains a provision for the issuance of letters of credit not to exceed the unused balance of the line of credit. As of September 30, 2002, we had letters of credit totaling $1.7 million. The line of credit requires us to maintain specified financial covenants related to tangible net worth and liquidity with which we were in compliance as of September 30, 2002. The line of credit expires on November 30, 2002. It is our intention to renew this line of credit when it expires.

As part of our business relationship with MCMS, Inc., the predecessor-in-interest to Plexus Corp., we entered into a $9.0 million operating equipment lease for manufacturing equipment in September 2000 with a third-party financing company; we, in turn, subleased the equipment to MCMS. The equipment lease with the third-party financing company requires us to maintain specified financial covenants related to profitability and our cash to debt ratio. As of September 30, 2002, we were in default with the covenant regarding profitability. We obtained a waiver for this violation.

In December 2001, we completed a private placement of $200.0 million of convertible subordinated notes. The notes mature on December 1, 2006. Interest is payable semi-annually at 3.5% per annum. The notes are convertible at the option of the holders into our common stock at an initial conversion price of $20.96 per share, subject to adjustment. The notes are redeemable in cash at our option at an initial redemption price of 101.4% of the principal amount on or after December 2004 if not converted to common stock prior to the redemption date. Each holder of the notes has the right to cause us to repurchase all of such holder’s convertible notes at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest upon a change of control of ownership of Extreme Networks, as defined in the offering circular.

We require substantial capital to fund our business, particularly to finance inventories and accounts receivable and for capital expenditures. As a result, we could be required to raise substantial additional capital at any time. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution to existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, these securities may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on our operations. If we are unable to obtain such additional capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned product development and marketing efforts, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

Fiscal 2000 was the only year in which we have achieved profitability. We reported a loss for fiscal 2002, fiscal 2001 and for the first quarter of fiscal 2003. We anticipate continuing to incur significant sales, marketing and service, product development and general and administrative expenses and, as a result, we will need to rationalize expense levels and increase revenue levels to achieve profitability in future fiscal quarters.

Our failure to control our operating expenses at a level that is consistent with anticipated revenue may cause our financial results to be worse than expected. A high percentage of our expenses are fixed in the short term, so any delay in generating or recognizing revenue could cause our quarterly operating results to fall below the expectations of public market analysts or investors, which could cause the price of our stock to fall.

We may experience a delay in generating or recognizing revenue for a number of reasons. Orders at the beginning of each quarter do not equal expected revenue for that quarter and are generally cancelable at any time. Accordingly, we are dependent upon obtaining orders during a quarter and shipping those orders in the same quarter to achieve our revenue objectives. In the first quarter of fiscal 2003 we did not receive enough product orders during the quarter to meet our revenue expectations for the quarter, and we reported a loss for the quarter. In addition, the timing of product releases and purchase orders, in addition to product availability, often results in a majority of our product shipments being scheduled near the end of a quarter. Failure to ship these products by the end of a quarter may adversely affect our operating results. Our customer agreements generally allow customers to delay scheduled delivery dates or to cancel orders within specified timeframes without significant charges to the customers. Furthermore, some of our customers require that we provide installation or inspection services that may delay the recognition of revenue for both products and services, and some of our customer agreements include acceptance provisions that prevent our ability to recognize revenue upon shipment.

The market for networking equipment is intensely competitive. Our principal competitors include Cisco Systems, Enterasys Networks, Foundry Networks, Nortel Networks and Riverstone Networks. In addition, a number of private companies have announced plans for new products, or have introduced products, that may compete with our own products. Some of our current and potential competitors have superior market leverage, longer operating histories and substantially greater financial, technical, sales and marketing resources, in addition to wider name recognition and larger installed customer bases. These competitors may have developed, or may in the future develop, new competing products based on technologies that compete with our own products or render our products obsolete. Furthermore, a number of these competitors may merge or form strategic partnerships that enable them to offer or bring to market competitive products.

The pricing policies of our competitors impact the overall demand for our products and services. Some of our competitors are capable of operating at significant losses for extended periods of time, increasing pricing pressure on our products and services. If we do not maintain competitive pricing, the demand for our products and services, as well as our market share, may decline, having an adverse effect on our business. From time to time, in responding to competitive pressures, we lower the prices of our products and services. When this happens, if we are unable to reduce our component costs or improve operating efficiencies, our revenues and margins will be adversely affected.

To remain competitive, we believe that we must, among other things, invest significant resources in developing new products, improve our current products and maintain customer satisfaction. Such investment will increase our expenses and affect our profitability. In addition, if we fail to make this investment, we may not be able to compete successfully with our competitors, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and future profitability.

Network products frequently contain undetected software or hardware errors when new products or new versions or updates of existing products are first released to the marketplace. In the past, we have experienced such errors in connection with new products and product upgrades. We recently experienced two component problems which caused us to incur unexpected costs and expenses and take an accrual for anticipated expenses and we have experienced such problems in prior periods. Our fiscal results for 2002 and for at least the first quarter of fiscal 2003 were adversely affected by such expenses. We expect that such errors or component failures will be found from time to time in the future in new or existing products, including in the components we incorporate in our products, after the commencement of commercial shipments. These problems may have a material adverse effect on our business by causing us to incur significant warranty and repair costs, diverting the attention of our engineering personnel from new product development efforts, delaying the recognition of revenue and causing significant customer relations problems. Further, if product is not accepted by customers due to defects, and such returns exceed the amount we accrued for defect returns based on our historical experience, our operating results would be adversely affected.

Our products must successfully interoperate with products from other vendors. As a result, when problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the sources of these problems. The occurrence of hardware and software errors, whether or not caused by our products, could result in the delay or loss of market acceptance of our products and any necessary revisions may cause us to incur significant expenses. The occurrence of any such problems would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

International sales constitute a significant portion of our sales. Our ability to grow will depend in part on the continued expansion of international sales. Sales to customers outside of the United States accounted for approximately 59% and 70% of our net revenue, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. Our international sales primarily depend on the success of our resellers and distributors. The failure of our resellers and distributors to sell our products internationally would limit our ability to sustain and grow our revenue. There are a number of risks arising from our international business, including:

In addition, conducting our business on a global basis subjects us to a number of frequently changing and complex trade protection measures and import or export regulatory requirements. Our failure to comply with these measures and regulatory requirements may result in the imposition of financial penalties and restrictions on our ability to conduct business in and with certain countries, which may harm our business and damage our reputation. Pursuant to regulations of the U.S. Department of Commerce providing for voluntary disclosure, we have disclosed information regarding a possible violation of certain export regulations. Following such disclosures the Department of Commerce will determine whether to conduct an investigation. If an investigation is commenced, we believe that these matters will be resolved without a material adverse effect on our business, and we are implementing procedures to reduce the risk of violations in the future.

Our international sales currently are U.S. dollar-denominated. As a result, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products less competitive in international markets. In the future, we may elect to invoice some of our international customers in local currency which will expose us to fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the particular local currency.

If we do so, we may decide to engage in hedging transactions to minimize the risk of such fluctuations. We have entered into foreign exchange forward contracts to offset the impact of payment of operating expenses in local currencies to some of our operating foreign subsidiaries. However, if we are not successful in managing these hedging transactions, we could incur losses from hedging activities.

The network equipment industry has traditionally experienced a rapid erosion of average selling prices due to a number of factors, including competitive pricing pressures, promotional pricing and technological progress . In addition, companies have lowered their prices in order to liquidate excess inventory that has accumulated as a result of the current economic slowdown. We anticipate that the average selling prices of our products will decrease in the future in response to competitive pricing pressures, excess inventories, increased sales discounts and new product introductions by us or our competitors, including, for example, competitive products manufactured with low-cost merchant silicon. We may experience substantial decreases in future operating results due to the erosion of our average selling prices. Competitive pressures are expected to increase as a result of the industry slowdown that began in the first half of 2001, coupled with the recent downturn in the broader economy. To maintain our gross margin, we must develop and introduce on a timely basis new products and product enhancements and continually reduce our product costs. Our failure to do so would likely cause our revenue and gross margins to decline, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cause the price of our common stock to decline.

With the current economic slowdown, some of our customers are forecasting that their revenue for the foreseeable future will generally be lower than originally anticipated. Some of these customers are experiencing, or are likely to experience, serious cash flow problems and, as a result, find it increasingly difficult to obtain financing, if at all. If some of these customers are not successful in generating sufficient revenue or securing alternate financing arrangements, they may not be able to pay, or may delay payment of, the amounts that they owe us. Furthermore, they may not order as many products from us as originally forecast, or cancel orders with us entirely. The inability of some of our potential customers to pay us for our products may adversely affect our cash flow, the timing of our revenue recognition and the amount of revenue, which may cause our stock price to decline.

The network equipment market is characterized by rapid technological progress, frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and evolving industry standards. If we do not regularly introduce new products in this dynamic environment, our product lines will become obsolete. Developments in routers and routing software could also significantly reduce demand for our products. Alternative technologies could achieve widespread market acceptance and displace the Ethernet technology on which we have based our product architecture. We cannot assure you that our technological approach will achieve broad market acceptance or that other technologies or devices will not supplant our own products and technology.

When we announce new products or product enhancements that have the potential to replace or shorten the life cycle of our existing products, customers may defer or cancel orders for our existing products. These actions could have a material adverse effect on our operating results by unexpectedly decreasing sales, increasing inventory levels of older products and exposing us to greater risk of product obsolescence. The market for switching products is evolving and we believe our ability to compete successfully in this market is dependent upon the continued compatibility and interoperability of our products with products and architectures offered by other vendors. In particular, the networking industry has been characterized by the successive introduction of new technologies or standards that have dramatically reduced the price and increased the performance of switching equipment. To remain competitive, we need to introduce products in a timely manner that incorporate, or are compatible with, these emerging technologies. We cannot assure you that any new products we introduce will be commercially successful. We have experienced delays in releasing new products and product enhancements in the past that resulted in lower quarterly revenue than anticipated. We may experience similar delays in product development and releases in the future, and any delay in product introduction could adversely affect our ability to compete, causing our operating results to be below our expectations or the expectations of public market analysts or investors.

We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. However, we cannot assure you that the actions we have taken will adequately protect our intellectual property rights or that other parties will not independently develop similar or competing products that do not infringe on our patents. We enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our employees, consultants and corporate partners, and control access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise misappropriate or use our products or technology.

Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent claims and related litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. We are actively involved in disputes and licensing discussions with others regarding their claimed proprietary rights and cannot assure you that we will always successfully defend ourselves against such claims. If we are found to infringe the proprietary rights of others, or if we otherwise settle such claims, we could be compelled to pay damages or royalties and either obtain a license to those intellectual property rights or alter our products so that they no longer infringe upon such proprietary rights. Any license could be very expensive to obtain or may not be available at all. Similarly, changing our products or processes to avoid infringing the rights of others may be costly or impractical. Litigation resulting from claims that we are infringing the proprietary rights of others could result in substantial costs and a diversion of resources, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have received notice from several major companies alleging that we are infringing their patents. Without regard to the merits of any of these claims, if judgments by a court of law on any claim received in the future were to be upheld, or if we otherwise agree to the settlement of such claims, the consequences to us may be severe and could require us to, among other actions:

Prior to the quarter ended March 31, 2001, we experienced rapid growth and expansion that placed, and may in the future place, a significant strain on our resources. Subsequent to that period, we have from time to time incurred unanticipated costs to downsize our operations to a level consistent with downward forecasts in sales. Even if we manage the current period of instability effectively, as well as possible expansion in the future, we may make mistakes in restructuring or operating our business such as inaccurate sales forecasting or incorrect material planning. Any of these mistakes may lead to unanticipated fluctuations in our operating results. We cannot assure you that we will be able to size our operations in accordance with growth or decline of our business in the future.

We are implementing additional management information systems and developing further operating, administrative, financial and accounting systems and controls to improve and maintain close coordination among our executive, engineering, accounting, finance, marketing, sales and operations organizations. In addition, we recently completed the transition to a new enterprise resource planning system. We may be unable to operate our control systems in an efficient manner, and our current or planned personnel systems, procedures, and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. The difficulties associated with designing and implementing these new systems, procedures, and controls may place a significant burden on our management and our internal resources. In addition, as we grow internationally, we will need to expand our worldwide operations and enhance our communications infrastructure. Any delay in the implementation of such new or enhanced systems, procedures or controls, or any disruption in the transition to such new or enhanced systems, procedures or controls, could adversely affect our ability to accurately forecast sales demand, manage our supply chain, and record and report financial and management information on a timely and accurate basis.

Our distribution strategy focuses primarily on developing and increasing the productivity of our indirect distribution channels through resellers and distributors. If we fail to develop and cultivate relationships with significant resellers, or if these resellers are not successful in their sales efforts, sales of our products may decrease and our operating results could suffer. Many of our resellers also sell products from other vendors that compete with our products. We cannot assure you that we will be able to enter into additional reseller and/or distribution agreements or that we will be able to successfully manage our product sales channels. Our failure to do any of these could limit our ability to grow or sustain revenue. In addition, our operating results will likely fluctuate significantly depending on the timing and amount of orders from our resellers. We cannot assure you that our resellers and/or distributors will continue to market or sell our products effectively or continue to devote the resources necessary to provide us with effective sales, marketing and technical support.

During the three months ended September 30, 2002, we derived substantially all of our revenue from sales of our Summit, BlackDiamond and Alpine products and related services. We expect that revenue from these product families will account for a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, widespread market acceptance of our product families is vital to our future success. Factors that may affect the sales of our products, some of which are beyond our control, include:

Our future performance will also depend on the successful development, introduction, and market acceptance of new and enhanced products that address customer requirements in a timely and cost-effective manner. In the past, we have experienced delays in product development and such delays may occur in the future. We are currently engaged in development of a third-generation chipset planned for use in future products. The introduction of new and enhanced products may cause our customers to defer or cancel orders for existing products. Therefore, to the extent customers defer or cancel orders in the expectation of new product releases, any delay in the development or introduction of new products could cause our operating results to suffer. The inability to achieve and maintain widespread levels of market acceptance for our current and future products may significantly impair our revenue growth.

To date, a limited number of resellers, distributors and other customers have accounted for a significant portion of our revenue. If any of our large customers stop or delay purchases, our revenue and profitability would be adversely affected. For example, one distributor of our products and one customer accounted for 15% and 11% of our revenue, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and one distributor of our products and one customer accounted for 18% and 11% of our revenue, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Our expense levels are based on our expectations as to future revenue and to a large extent are fixed in the short term, so a substantial reduction or delay in sales of our products to a significant reseller, distributor or other customer could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. Although our largest customers may differ from period-to-period, we anticipate that our operating results for any given period will continue to depend to a significant extent on large orders from a relatively small number of customers, particularly in view of the relatively high per unit sales price of our products and long sales cycles.

The use of indirect sales channels may contribute to the length and variability of our sales cycle. Our products have a relatively high per unit sales price, and the purchase of our products often constitutes a significant strategic decision by a customer regarding its communications infrastructure. The decision by customers to purchase our products is often based on the results of a variety of internal procedures associated with the evaluation, testing, implementation and acceptance of new technologies. Accordingly, the product evaluation process frequently results in a lengthy sales cycle, typically ranging from three months to longer than a year, and as a result, our ability to sell products is subject to a number of significant risks, including:

We currently purchase several key components used in the manufacture of our products from single or limited sources and are dependent upon supply from these sources to meet our needs. Certain components such as tantalum capacitors, static random access memory, or SRAM, and printed circuit boards have been, and may be in the future, in short supply. We have in the past, and are likely in the future, to encounter shortages and delays in obtaining these or other components, and this could have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet customer orders. Our principal sole-source components include:

We use our forecast of expected demand to determine our material requirements. Lead times for materials and components we order vary significantly, and depend on factors such as the specific supplier, contract terms and demand for a component at a given time. If forecasts exceed orders, we may have excess and/or obsolete inventory on hand or under non-cancelable purchase commitments that could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. If orders exceed forecasts, we may have inadequate inventory of certain materials and components, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. We do not have agreements fixing long-term prices or minimum volume requirements from these suppliers. From time to time we have experienced shortages and allocations of certain components, resulting in delays in filling orders. Qualifying new suppliers to compensate for such shortages may be time-consuming and costly, and may increase the likelihood of errors in design or production. In addition, during the development of our products, we have experienced delays in the prototyping of our ASICs, which in turn has led to delays in product introductions. We cannot assure you that similar delays will not occur in the future. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that the performance of the components as incorporated in our products will meet the quality requirements of our customers.

We rely on independent contractors to manufacture our products. We do not have long-term contracts with any of these manufacturers. We currently utilize three companies for the manufacture of our products— Flextronics International, Ltd., located in San Jose, California, Solectron Corporation, located in Milpitas, California and Plexus Corp., located in Nampa, Idaho and Penang, Malaysia. We have experienced delays in product shipments from contract manufacturers in the past, which in turn delayed product shipments to our customers. Similar or other problems may arise in the future, such as products of inferior quality, insufficient quantity of products, or the interruption or discontinuance of operations of a manufacturer, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

We do not know whether we will effectively manage our contract manufacturers or that these manufacturers will meet our future requirements for timely delivery of products of sufficient quality and quantity. We intend to transition the manufacture of some of our products from one contract manufacturer to another. We also intend to regularly introduce new products and product enhancements, which will require that we rapidly achieve volume production by coordinating our efforts with those of our suppliers and contract manufacturers. The inability of our contract manufacturers to provide us with adequate supplies of high-quality products, or a reduction in the number of our contract manufacturers may cause a delay in our ability to fulfill orders and may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

As part of our cost-reduction efforts, we will need to realize lower per unit product costs from our contract manufacturers by means of volume efficiencies and the utilization of manufacturing sites in lower-cost geographies. However, we cannot be certain when or if such price reductions will occur. The failure to obtain such price reductions would adversely affect our gross margins and operating results.

A change in accounting policies can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New pronouncements and varying interpretations of pronouncements have occurred with frequency and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business.

Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, new SEC regulations and Nasdaq Stock Market rules, are creating uncertainty for companies such as ours. We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, we intend to invest all reasonably necessary resources to comply with evolving standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.

Beginning on July 6, 2001, purported securities fraud class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The cases were consolidated and the litigation is now captioned as In re Extreme Networks, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, Civ. No. 01-6143 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.), related to In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation, 21 MC 92 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.).

On or about April 19, 2002, plaintiffs electronically served an amended complaint. The amended complaint is brought purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased Extreme Networks’ common stock from April 8, 1999 through December 6, 2000. It names as defendants Extreme Networks; six of the its present and former officers; and several investment banking firms that served as underwriters of Extreme Networks’ initial public offering and October 1999 secondary offering. The complaint alleges liability under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on the grounds that the registration statement for the offerings did not disclose that: (1) the underwriters had agreed to allow certain customers to purchase shares in the offerings in exchange for excess commissions paid to the underwriters; and (2) the underwriters had arranged for certain customers to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at predetermined prices. The Securities Act of 1933 allegations against Extreme Networks and its officers are made as to the secondary offering only. The amended complaint also alleges that false analyst reports were issued. No specific damages are claimed.

We are aware that similar allegations have been made in other lawsuits filed in the Southern District of New York challenging over 300 other initial public offerings and secondary offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000. On July 15, 2002, we (and the other issuer defendants) filed a motion to dismiss. We cannot assure you that we will prevail in the lawsuit. Failure to prevail could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the future.

Two of the manufacturers of our products, Flextronics and Solectron, are located in California. In the event of an energy crisis, these contractors may be unable to manufacture sufficient quantities of our products to meet our needs, or they may increase the fees charged for their services. We do not have long-term contracts with either Flextronics or Solectron. The inability of our contract manufacturers to provide us with adequate supplies of products would cause a delay in our ability to fulfill our orders, which could harm our business, and any increase in their fees could adversely affect our financial condition.

In addition, the majority of our operations are located in California. We currently do not have backup generators or alternate sources of power in the event of a blackout. If blackouts interrupt our power supply, we would temporarily be unable to continue operations at our facilities. Any such interruption in our ability to continue operations at these facilities could damage our reputation, harm our ability to retain existing customers and to obtain new customers, and could result in lost revenue, any of which could substantially harm our business and results of operation.

We believe our future success will also depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled managerial, engineering, sales, marketing and service, finance and operations personnel. The market for these personnel is competitive, especially in the San Francisco Bay Area, and we have had difficulty hiring employees, particularly engineers, in the timeframe we desire. In addition, retention has become more difficult for us and other public technology companies as a result of the recent stock market decline, which caused the price of many of our employees’ stock options to be above the current market price of our stock. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel in the future or delays in hiring desired personnel, particularly engineers and sales personnel, could make it difficult for us to manage our business and meet key objectives, such as new product introductions. In addition, companies in the networking industry whose employees accept positions with competitors frequently claim that competitors have engaged in unfair hiring practices. We have from time to time received claims like this from other companies and, although to date they have not resulted in material litigation, we do not know whether we will receive additional claims in the future as we seek to hire qualified personnel or that such claims will not result in material litigation. We could incur substantial costs in defending against any such claims, regardless of the merits of such claims.

The market for network equipment products is characterized by the need to support industry standards as different standards emerge, evolve and achieve acceptance. We will not be competitive unless we continually introduce new products and product enhancements that meet these emerging standards. In the past, we have introduced new products that were not compatible with certain technological standards, and in the future we may not be able to effectively address the compatibility and interoperability issues that arise as a result of technological changes and evolving industry standards. Our products must comply with various United States federal government regulations and standards defined by agencies such as the Federal

Communications Commission, in addition to standards established by governmental authorities in various foreign countries and recommendations of the International Telecommunication Union. If we do not comply with existing or evolving industry standards or if we fail to obtain timely domestic or foreign regulatory approvals or certificates we will not be able to sell our products where these standards or regulations apply, which may prevent us from sustaining our net revenue or achieving profitability.

As part of our business strategy, we review acquisition and strategic investment prospects that we believe would complement our current product offerings, augment our market coverage or enhance our technical capabilities, or otherwise offer growth opportunities. From time to time we review investments in new businesses and we expect to make investments in, and to acquire, businesses, products, or technologies in the future. In the event of any future acquisitions, we could:

These actions by us could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or the price of our common stock. Moreover, even if we do obtain benefits in the form of increased sales and earnings, there may be a lag between the time when the expenses associated with an acquisition are incurred and the time when we recognize such benefits. This is particularly relevant in cases where it is necessary to integrate new types of technology into our existing portfolio and new types of products may be targeted for potential customers with which we do not have pre-existing relationships.

cash available from credit facilities and future operations, will enable us to meet our working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, if cash from future operations is insufficient, or if cash is used for acquisitions or other currently unanticipated uses, we may need additional capital. The development and marketing of new products and the expansion of reseller and distribution channels and associated support personnel requires a significant commitment of resources. In addition, if the markets for our products develop more slowly than anticipated, or if we fail to establish significant market share and achieve sufficient net revenue, we may continue to consume significant amounts of capital. As a result, we could be required to raise additional capital. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution of the shares held by existing stockholders. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, such securities may provide the holders certain rights, preferences, and privileges senior to those of common stockholders, and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on our operations. We cannot assure you that additional capital, if required, will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of additional capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned product development and marketing efforts, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

In connection with the sale of convertible subordinated notes in December 2001, we incurred $200 million of indebtedness. We will require substantial amounts of cash to fund scheduled payments of interest on the convertible notes, payment of the principal amount of the convertible notes, future capital expenditures, payments on our leases and any increased working capital requirements. If we are unable to meet our cash requirements out of cash flow from operations, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain alternative financing. The degree to which we are financially leveraged could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for working capital, acquisitions or other purposes and could make us more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures. In the absence of such financing, our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions, to make future acquisitions, to absorb adverse operating results or to fund capital expenditures or increased working capital requirements would be significantly reduced. Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will be dependent upon our future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, some of which are beyond our control. If we do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to repay the notes at maturity, we could attempt to refinance the notes; however, no assurance can be given that such a refinancing would be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Any failure by us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the notes at maturity (with respect to payments of principal) or prior thereto (with respect to payments of interest or required repurchases) would constitute a default under the indenture and could cause a default under agreements governing our other indebtedness.

We have certain long-term real estate lease commitments carrying future obligations for non-cancelable lease payments net of estimated sublease income. Reductions in our workforce and the restructuring of operations during fiscal year 2002 resulted in the need to consolidate certain of these leased facilities, located primarily in Northern California. We recorded excess facilities charges of $25.4 million during fiscal 2002. For more information, see Note 7 of “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,” above. We intend to sublease certain of these facilities and may obtain sublease income to offset the carrying costs of these facilities. However, based on a recent deterioration of real estate market conditions in connection with a downturn in the economy, we will not be able to sublease these facilities at the times or on the terms we anticipated when we took the excess facilities charge and therefore if the market does not improve, we may incur additional charges in the future. In addition, we may incur additional charges for excess facilities as a result of additional reductions in our workforce or future restructuring of operations. We will continue to be responsible for all carrying costs of these facilities until such time as we can sublease these facilities or terminate the applicable leases based on the contractual terms of the lease agreements, and these costs may have an adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may decide to raise additional funds through public or private debt or equity financing to fund our operations. If we raise funds by issuing equity securities, the percentage ownership of current stockholders will be reduced and the new equity securities may have rights prior to those of our common stock, including the common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes. We may not obtain sufficient financing on terms that are favorable to you or us. We may delay, limit or eliminate some or all of our proposed operations if adequate funds are not available.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. Delaware law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. In addition, our board of directors has the right to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer. Although we believe these provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law and our stockholder rights plan, which is described below, will provide for an opportunity to receive a higher bid by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors, these provisions apply even if the offer may be considered beneficial by some of our stockholders.

Our board of directors adopted a stockholder rights plan, pursuant to which we declared and paid a dividend of one right for each share of common stock held by stockholders of record as of May 14, 2001. Under the plan, each right will entitle stockholders to purchase a fractional share of our preferred stock for $150.00. Each such fractional share of the new preferred stock has terms designed to make it substantially the economic equivalent of one share of common stock. Initially the rights will not be exercisable and will trade with our common stock. Generally, the rights may become exercisable if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of our common stock or commences a tender or exchange offer upon consummation of which such person or group would beneficially own 15% or more of our common stock. When the rights become exercisable, our board of directors has the right to authorize the issuance of one share of our common stock in exchange for each right that is then exercisable.

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximize the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk. Some of the securities that we have invested in may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with a fixed interest rate at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the principal amount of our investment will probably decline. To minimize this risk, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of securities, including commercial paper, other non-government debt securities and money market funds. In general, money market funds are not subject to market risk because the interest paid on such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. The following table presents the amounts of our cash equivalents, short-term investments and marketable securities that are subject to market risk by range of expected maturity and weighted-average interest rates as of September 30, 2002. This table does not include money market funds because those funds are not subject to market risk.

	Maturing in
	Three month or less			Three months to one year			Greater than one year			Total		Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Included in cash and cash equivalents	$	42,928								$	42,928	$	42,928
Weighted average interest rate		1.77	%
Included in short-term investments	$	94,572		$	44,453					$	139,025	$	139,025
Weighted average interest rate		2.37	%		4.19	%
Included in marketable securities							$	185,593		$	185,593	$	185,593
Weighted average interest rate								3.75	%

Currently, all of our sales and the majority of our expenses are denominated in United States dollars and as a result, we have experienced no significant foreign exchange gains and losses to date. While we have conducted some transactions in foreign currencies during the three months ended September 30, 2002 and expect to continue to do so, we do not anticipate that foreign exchange gains or losses will be significant.

We enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to mitigate the effect of gains and losses generated by the remeasurement of certain assets and liabilities denominated in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. These derivatives are not designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”). At September 30, 2002, these exposures amounted to $1.1 million and were partially offset by foreign currency forward contracts with a notional principal amount of $1.1 million (fair value of approximately $68,000). These contracts were traded in the last fiscal month of the quarter and have a final maturity of less than 45 days.

We also use foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge foreign currency forecasted transactions related to certain operating expenses, denominated in Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Swedish Krona and the British Pound. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS 133. At September 30, 2002, these exposures amounted to $6.3 million and were partially offset by forward foreign currency contracts with a notional principal amount of $6.3 million (fair value of approximately $1,400). These contracts were traded in the last week of the quarter and have a final maturity of less than 60 days.

We have historically made investments in several privately held companies. These nonmarketable investments are accounted for under the cost method, as ownership is less than 20 percent and we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating, financing and investing activities of the investee companies. These investments are inherently risky as the market for the technologies or products they have under development are typically in the early stages and may never materialize. It is possible that we could lose our entire initial investment in these companies. As a part of management’s process of regularly reviewing these investments for impairment, we recorded write-downs of $9.7 million in fiscal 2002 on certain investments, which were determined to be other than temporarily impaired. At September 30, 2002, the carrying value of our remaining investments was immaterial.

a) Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-14(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), within 90 days of the filing date of this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Other than the securities fraud class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York beginning on July 6, 2001, as described in Note 4 of “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,” we are not aware of any pending legal proceedings against us that, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. We may in the future be party to litigation arising in the course of our business, including claims that we allegedly infringe third-party trademarks and other intellectual property rights. Such claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

DELAWARE		77-0430270
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3585 Monroe Street Santa Clara, California		95051
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

		PAGE
PART I.	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets September 30, 2002 and June 30, 2002	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001	5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	16

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	33

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	34

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	34

Item 2.	Changes in Securities	Not Applicable

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	Not Applicable

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	Not Applicable

Item 5.	Other Information	Not Applicable

Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	35

Signatures		36

Certifications		37

	September 30, 2002		June 30, 2002
Raw materials	$	2,762	$	3,052
Finished goods		31,436		21,575

Total	$	34,198	$	24,627

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2002		2001
Net revenue:
United States	$	40,864	$	32,610
Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”)		20,667		24,589
Japan		28,006		37,062
Other		11,032		14,028

	$	100,569	$	108,289

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

	September 30, 2002		June 30, 2002
Unrealized gain on investments	$	2,472	$	1,801
Change in fair value of derivatives		1		(113	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		116		163

Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	2,589	$	1,851

	Charges		Cash payments			Write-offs			Restructuring liabilities at September 30, 2002
Purchase of leased properties	$	39,000	$	(39,000	)	$	—		$	—
Excess facilities		25,432		(3,691	)		—			21,741
Asset impairments		9,138		—			(9,138	)		—

Total	$	73,570	$	(42,691	)	$	(9,138	)	$	21,741

	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1 – 3 Years		After Three Years
Contractual Obligations:
Convertible subordinated notes	$	231,500	$	7,000	$	14,000	$	210,500
Non-cancelable operating lease obligations		50,901		9,364		17,212		24,325

Total contractual cash obligations	$	282,401	$	16,364	$	31,212	$	234,825


a)	Exhibits:

	99.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer

	99.2	Certification of Principal Accounting Officer

b)	Reports on Form 8-K—None


Dated: November 11, 2002								/s/ GORDON L. STITT
								Gordon L. Stitt Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 11, 2002								/s/ HAROLD L. COVERT
								Harold L. Covert Chief Financial Officer