Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 0-23970
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 77-0216135
(State or other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number)
2859 Bayview Drive
Fremont, California 94538
(Address, including zip code of principal executive offices)
(510) 897-5000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Title of class
Common Stock
Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained to the best
of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant as of January 25, 2000 was $610,560,503 based upon the closing price
of the Registrant's Common Stock on the Nasdaq National Market System on that
date.
The number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding as of January
25, 2000 was 12,753,222.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant's proxy statement for its annual meeting of
stockholders to be held on April 25, 2000 are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I Page
ITEM 1. Business...................................................................................................... 3
ITEM 2. Properties.................................................................................................... 9
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings............................................................................................. 9
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders........................................................... 9
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters...................................... 10
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data....................................................................................... 11
ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations..................................................................................... 12
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.................................................... 23
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data................................................................... 24
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure....................................................................................... 39
PART III
ITEM 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant............................................................ 40
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation........................................................................................ 40
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management................................................ 40
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................................................................ 40
PART IV
ITEM 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K............................................... 41
Signatures.................................................................................................... 43
Supplemental Schedule......................................................................................... 44
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
We design and sell highly scalable, cost-effective Gigabit Ethernet switching
solutions designed for local area networks, or LANs. All of our switches are
based on our highly flexible NuWaveArchitecture, which combines our advanced
design and our proprietary Application-Specific Integrated Circuits, or ASICs.
This architecture is designed to enable us to deliver standards-based switches
that can work seamlessly with a wide variety of existing LAN infrastructures and
technologies. We believe our NuWaveArchitecture offers the industry's only wire-
speed, non-blocking performance capability on all ports in a stackable
configuration and facilitates the creation of multiple configurations of Fast
Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet switches. We are focusing our sales and marketing
resources on original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. Our NuWaveArchitecture
allows OEMs to quickly create or expand their product lines for the rapidly
growing and changing enterprise market at lower costs and with greater
functionality than possible with other currently available switch architectures.
As the Internet and complex applications, such as enterprise resource planning,
data warehousing and data backup, have become pervasive, the volume of data
traffic over LANs has increased dramatically and created bottlenecks on LANs
that degrade network performance. Enterprises have historically implemented
Layer 2 switches and software-based Layer 3 routers to manage increased traffic
and to provide the intelligence necessary to process increasingly complex
multi-protocol traffic. However, increasing bandwidth requirements and
transmission speeds combined with multiple traffic types such as voice, data and
video have strained the performance capabilities of software-based Layer 3
routers. In response to these developments, LAN managers have begun to implement
hardware-based Layer 3 switches in their networks to replace both Layer 2
switches and software-based Layer 3 multi-protocol routers.
Despite the performance improvements of Layer 3 switches versus Layer 3 routers,
many of today's Layer 3 switching solutions still have limitations, such as
traffic blocking when additional switches are stacked to increase capacity. We
address this issue and others through our proprietary NuWaveArchitecture, which
enables us to deliver the following benefits to our customers and end-users:
. High performance at low cost. We believe our advanced architecture
and modular design enable us to deliver products with exceptional
price/performance advantages regardless of scale or configuration.
. Scalability. We believe we offer the only wire speed, non-blocking
Layer 3 stacked switching solution, thereby enabling enterprises to
expand their LANs without creating bottlenecks or impacting network
performance. We designed our products to enable the stacking, where
additional modular units can connect to existing units via internal
high bandwidth channels that do not block traffic or reduce switching
resources.
. Flexibility. Our proprietary technology enables us to rapidly create
new product configurations without redesigning the proprietary ASICs
that form the core of our switches. As a result, we believe our OEM
customers will be able to bring new products to market more quickly
than would be possible using competitive product offerings or
internally developed technology. In addition, our architecture
enables us to add software-based Layer 4-7 capabilities.
. Manageability. Our products' true stacking capabilities simplify
network management because the management software views the stacked
modules as a single unit. We believe our products reduce the
complexity of network management, thereby lowering overall cost of
ownership.
We were incorporated in California in March 1989 and were reincorporated in
Delaware in 1994. We initially focused on networking products based on fiber
distributed data interface, or FDDI, technology, and we obtained a significant
share of the market for FDDI adapter products in the early 1990s. Because the
market for FDDI-based products declined significantly beginning in 1995, we
developed a new line of Layer 2 Fast Ethernet switching products that we first
shipped in early 1996. By 1998, the market for our FDDI-based products and our
Layer 2 Fast Ethernet products (together, our "legacy products") declined
substantially, and we committed nearly all our resources to the development of a
new line of Layer 3 Gigabit Ethernet switches founded on our NuWaveArchitecture.
We commenced limited commercial shipments of the first product in this line, the
Keyston24g in December 1999.
Due to the decrease in profitability of our Layer 2 Fast Ethernet products, in
June 1999 we divested our research and development operations in Taiwan that
were focused on legacy products. See Note 8 to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
As used in this annual report, the terms "we," "us," "our" and "NPI" mean
Network Peripherals Inc. and its subsidiaries (unless the context indicates
another meaning), and the term "common stock" means our common stock, par value
$0.001 per share.
3
PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY
Through 1999, our product offerings consisted of Fast Ethernet and FDDI LAN
switches and hubs, FDDI to Fast Ethernet bridges, FDDI Network Interface Cards,
and network management software. However, as the life cycle of these legacy
products reached maturity during 1999, we intend to decrease, and ultimately
cease, shipment of these products in 2000 in accordance to the decreasing demand
and profitability in this market.
The information in the following paragraphs contains forward-looking statements
describing new products that are expected to be available for shipment to our
customers during 2000. The successful completion and shipment of these products
is subject to a number of uncertainties, including verification testing to
confirm that the products meet our standards for quality, reliability and
interoperability; availability of components; pricing actions by competitors
that may render it unprofitable to introduce the products; market acceptance of
the products; and the emergence or broad acceptance of new technologies that may
render the products obsolete.
All of our Gigabit Ethernet switches are based on our flexible
NuWaveArchitecture, which combines advanced design and proprietary ASICs to
deliver standards-based switches that are intended to work seamlessly with any
existing LAN. Our NuWaveArchitecture offers the industry's only wire-speed, non-
blocking performance capability on all ports in a stackable configuration and
facilitates the creation of multiple configurations of Fast Ethernet and Gigabit
Ethernet switches. This architecture offers a 64 Gigabit per second, or Gbps,
crosspoint switching fabric that enables stacked configurations of up to 96 Fast
Ethernet ports or 16 Gigabit Ethernet ports or a combination of Fast Ethernet
and Gigabit Ethernet ports. All ports operate at Layer 2 and Layer 3 and provide
Layer 4 functionality. In addition, the NuWaveArchitecture eliminates blocking
with multiple input buffers, separate queues for unicast and multicast traffic
and other special queuing and buffering techniques. Further, our architectural
approach gives us the capability to increase functionality and reduce cost in
future generations of NuWaveArchitecture.
Standalone LAN Switching Solutions
Keystone24g. We began commercial shipments of the Keystone24g in December 1999.
It is the first commercially available Gigabit Ethernet switch based on our
NuWaveArchitecture. It is a fully managed standalone switch with 24 fixed Fast
Ethernet ports and two optional Gigabit up-links. The Keystone24g features
advanced, traffic-enhancing capabilities such as wire-speed IP routing and
support for QoS traffic classes, IP Multicast and protocol-based virtual LANs.
Stacking LAN Switching Solutions
Keystone24mg Stack Master. We expect to commence commercial shipments of the
Keystone24mg Stack Master in the first quarter of 2000. It is a highly
scalable, fully managed Layer 3 switch that supports high capacity Gigabit
Ethernet, Fast Ethernet and WAN interfaces. The Keystone24mg incorporates a
powerful, non-blocking 64-Gbps switching fabric. The Keystone24mg Stack Master
has 24 fixed Fast Ethernet ports and in a stacked environment can provide up
to 96 Fast Ethernet ports without blocking. Enterprises can combine the
Keystone24mg with up to three Capstone24t and/or Capstone8f Stack Slaves to
provide a highly scalable, cost-effective Layer 3 stacked switching solution.
The Keystone24mg Stack Master communicates with and manages all Capstone Stack
Switch ports over the stacking interface as if they were built directly into
the Keystone24mg chassis. The use of dedicated, separate channels for user
data and management and control information is designed to ensure wire-speed
performance even under sustained periods of high traffic volume while
maintaining network integrity.
Capstone24t Stack Slave. We expect to commence commercial shipments of our
Capstone24t Stack Slave in the first quarter of 2000. The Capstone24t connects
to the Keystone24mg over an advanced stacking interface based on our proprietary
ASICs. The interface connects the Capstone24t directly to the Keystone24mg's
64-Gbps switching fabric. The Capstone24t sends data over a dedicated 6-Gbps
channel and sends management and control information over a separate 2-Gbps
link. The Capstone24t has 24 fixed, full-duplex, auto-negotiating Fast Ethernet
ports. One Capstone24t and one Keystone24mg create a 48-port stack, while a
combination of one Keystone24mg and three Capstone24t switches creates a 96-port
stack. The addition of two optional Gigabit up-links on the Keystone24mg can
expand the stack functionality and extend price/performance advantages.
Capstone8f Stack Slave. We expect to commence commercial shipments of the
Capstone8f Stack Slave in the first quarter of 2000. The Capstone8f is similar
in features and functions to the Capstone24t except that it is designed to
communicate over a fiber connection rather than a copper connection used in
the Capstone24t. Each Capstone8f offers eight fixed Fast Ethernet ports. A
combination of one Keystone24mg and three Capstone8f switches builds a 48-port
stack.
4
Backbone Switch in Solutions
Cornerstone6g Switch. We expect to commence commercial shipments of the
Cornerstone6g in the first quarter of 2000. The Cornerstone6g provides up to 12
Gigabit ports and 16 Fast Ethernet ports. The Cornerstone6g is a fully managed
standalone switch that supports high capacity Gigabit Ethernet and Fast Ethernet
port configurations. The base unit has six fixed Gigabit Ethernet ports.
Customers can also choose an additional six Gigabit Ethernet ports and a 16 port
Fast Ethernet option. Gigabit Ethernet ports on the Cornerstone6g are
available in short-haul fiber (SX) and long-haul fiber (LX), and we are
developing a configuration that utilizes copper. This combination of port
options makes our Cornerstone6g suitable for a range of high performance
applications, including data centers, network backbones and power workgroups.
Management Software
NuSightGEMS is our Gigabit Ethernet management software that we bundle and ship
with our NuWaveArchitecture products. The initial version shipped with our
Keystone24g in December 1999, and we intend to offer enhanced versions for each
of our NuWaveArchitecture products as they are produced. NuSightGEMS provides
advanced and easy to use management capabilities that simplify user
configuration of our products as well as diagnostic and management tools. This
software allows users to define policies to prioritize traffic flowing through
the switch according to user name, user group, time of day and location.
NuSightGEMS is based on widely accepted industry standards and operates with a
variety of management software applications. Further, NuSightGEMS interacts with
Novell's Network Directory Services to provide customers with Directory Enabled
Network functions that can establish network behavior based on user-defined
procedures. NuSightGEMS also takes advantage of the various QoS functions
incorporated with our NuWaveArchitecture to give customers greater management
control and flexibility over our products and their LANs.
MARKETING, SALES AND SUPPORT
We focus our sales and marketing efforts on OEMs, value added resellers, or
VARs, system integrators and distributors. As of December 31, 1999, our
worldwide sales and marketing organization included 32 full-time technically
trained marketing, sales and support personnel located in the United States, the
Netherlands and Taiwan. We have domestic sales offices located in Fremont and
Los Angeles, California, and Boston, Massachusetts.
The information in the following paragraph contains forward looking statements
describing our sales and marketing strategy. There are a number of uncertainties
that could affect the success of the plan including the timely availability of
new products by us, reliability, price and performance characteristics of the
components, new and existing products, the introduction of similar products by
competitors, pricing actions by competitors and our inability to recruit and
retain required sales and marketing staff with the needed skills.
OEMs. We anticipate that the majority of our sales in future periods will be to
OEM customers. OEMs frequently require that suppliers modify their product
configuration to meet specific parameters such as port density or management
functionality. Our NuWaveArchitecture is designed to allow OEMs to quickly
create or expand their product lines for the rapidly growing enterprise market
at lower costs and with greater functionality than possible with other switch
architectures. We intend to leverage the flexibility of the NuWaveArchitecture
to integrate our products into OEMs' product lines. OEMs can exercise
significant influence in the development of our target market because they
utilize our products to deliver to end users complete, factory-configured
solutions that are installed and field-serviced by the OEM's technical support
organizations. We intend to partner with leading OEMs to introduce new products
and develop new markets. OEMs will provide critical input as we develop the next
generation of products. Our sales personnel, in addition to traditional
marketing and sales functions, are responsible for initiating and developing
relationships with OEM leaders in the computer networking industry. While we do
not generally obtain long-term purchase commitments from OEM customers, we enter
into contracts with OEM customers to establish the terms and conditions of sales
made pursuant to orders from OEMs. Further, the OEM customers typically provide
us with a rolling forecast up to three months in advance of shipment.
VARs, System Integrators and Distributors. We also expect future revenue from
sales to VARs, system integrators and distributors. We have existing
relationships with a large number of these distribution channel customers due
to our experience with our legacy products. We intend to leverage this base of
resellers to seek new opportunities in the deployment of the NuWave product
line. Our technically trained staff is responsible for initiating and
developing relationships with these customers by providing insight into the
evolution of the network environment and facilitating the development and
deployment of optimal network solutions, domestically and internationally.
In 1999, 56% of our sales was in North America, with the balance of the sales to
Asia and Europe, representing 30% and 14%, respectively. Sun Microsystems
accounted for 36% of net sales in 1999. The Company has experienced
fluctuations in the volume of activity with individual customers and changes in
customer base and expects such fluctuations and changes
5
to continue in the future with the NuWave product line. The loss of a major
customer, reductions of a major order or delay in a major shipment could
adversely affect our business and financial performance.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
In June 1999, we divested our Hsin-chu office, the research and development
center for our Layer 2 switching products located in Taiwan, as an integral part
of our strategy to direct all engineering effort towards the development of the
NuWaveArchitecture. The net assets, assembled workforce and intellectual
property associated with our Layer 2 switching products were transferred to the
buyer; however, we retained royalty-free licensing rights to continue
development and distribution of these products. In 1999, our research and
development expenses were $7.8 million.
The information in this section contains forward-looking statements describing
our product development plans for 2000 and beyond. The successful development
and introduction of new products is subject to a number of uncertainties,
including our ability to recruit, train and retain adequate numbers of
professional engineers, successful design of proprietary ASICs and computer
software, design, development and verification testing to confirm that the
products meet our standards for quality, reliability and interoperability,
availability of components, pricing actions by competitors that may render it
unprofitable to introduce the products, unanticipated technical obstacles or
delays, and the emergence or wide acceptance of new technologies that could
render our products obsolete.
Our future success is dependent on our ability to enhance current products and
to design and produce new products that are at the forefront of technological
advancements. We work closely with our OEM partners, reseller customers and
research organizations to identify new solutions to meet the current and future
needs of enterprises and Internet service providers. We design our products
consistent with industry standards to ensure interoperability, and we intend to
support emerging standards in accordance with our product strategy.
We designed the NuWaveArchitecture based on common ASICs and management software
to serve as the foundation of all new products in the NuWave product line. This
enables us to reduce product design and development cycles providing for fast
time to market for new products and features. We intend to exploit the
NuWaveArchitecture in reducing costs and enhancing existing products and in
developing new products.
As of December 31, 1999, we employed 31 personnel in research and development,
including ASIC design, software development and quality assurance. We also
engage third party consultants to expedite development efforts of certain
projects when appropriate.
CUSTOMER SERVICE AND SUPPORT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
Our customer service and support organization maintains and supports products
sold by our sales force to end users, and provides technical support to our
VARs and OEMs. Generally, our VARs and OEMs provide installation, maintenance
and support services to their customers, and we assist them in providing such
support. Questions and problems from end users, VARs and OEMs can be handled
via telephone, e-mail and facsimile. Our website is continually updated to
enable our customers to download the latest technical information and tips,
along with firmware, software and product manuals. This same group also
conducts new product Beta testing to ensure that our new products will meet
customer requirements when those products reach the marketplace.
Our quality assurance organization is tied to our customer service and
support organization in order to maintain its focus on satisfaction of customer
requirements and expectations. This group conducts network testing, OEM and
third party testing, problem reproduction and resolution and validation of
manufacturing tools in order to ensure compliance with industry standards,
product performance and interoperability with our customer's existing
equipment.
MANUFACTURING
Our manufacturing operations consist of procurement of components and the
assembly, testing and quality assurance of finished goods for shipment to
customers. We purchase the components of our products, including our proprietary
ASICs, circuit boards, integrated circuits and power supplies, from third
parties. NEC is the sole manufacturer of our ASICs. We monitor the quality of
the purchased components through quality assurance procedures at our
manufacturing facility in Taiwan and in our headquarters in Fremont, California.
We currently conduct final test and assembly of our products at our
manufacturing facility in Taiwan, which is staffed by 52 full-time personnel
experienced in advanced manufacturing, test engineering and quality assurance.
Our manufacturing operation is ISO 9002 certified.
In January 2000, we entered into an agreement with Solectron Corporation, a
major contract manufacturer with global capabilities, located in Milpitas,
California, to provide additional manufacturing capacity. This arrangement will
enable us to manufacture our products near our customers and accommodate
significant increases in production volume, if necessary. Under this contract,
Solectron will purchase the components for our products and assemble them to our
specifications. We believe this will enable us to leverage Solectron's
established relationships with suppliers to procure materials at reduced costs
and mitigate potential supply constraints. We intend to utilize Solectron's
extensive resources and expertise to assist us in manufacturing engineering,
repair and product testing and burn-in. We intend to continue to perform all
component and supplier qualification, quality assurance and document control at
our facilities.
We select suppliers on the basis of technology, manufacturing capacity, quality
and cost. Whenever possible and practicable, we strive to have at least two
manufacturing locations for each component. Nevertheless, our reliance on third
party suppliers and manufacturers involves risks, including possible limitations
on availability of products due to market abnormalities, lack of control over
delivery schedules, fluctuating manufacturing yields, and high production
costs. The
6
inability of our suppliers to deliver products of acceptable quality and in a
timely manner or our inability to procure adequate supplies of our products
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
operating results.
COMPETITION
The markets in which we compete are intensely competitive and are characterized
by frequent new product introductions, changing customer preferences and
evolving technology and industry standards. Our competitors continue to
introduce products with improved price/performance characteristics, and we will
have to do the same to remain competitive. Increased competition is likely to
result in significant price reductions and may result in lower than expected
revenues or profit margins, any of which could harm our business, financial
condition or operating results.
Many of our current and potential competitors have significantly broader product
offerings, greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources, and
larger installed bases of customers than we do. The Layer 3 switching market is
in the early stage of development with competition in this market coming from
relatively new market entrants such as Extreme Networks and Foundry Networks, as
well as from more established companies such as Nortel Networks, Cisco Systems
and 3Com. We believe that this market will consolidate over time and that this
consolidation could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively. A
number of companies developing technologies similar to ours have been acquired
by our larger competitors. These acquisitions are likely to permit our
competitors to devote significantly greater resources to the development and
marketing of new competitive products and the marketing of existing products to
their installed bases. We expect that competition will increase as a result of
these and other industry consolidations and alliances. Some of our current and
potential OEM customers could develop products internally that would replace our
products. The resulting lost sales of our products to any such OEMs, in addition
to the increased competition presented by these OEMs, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We believe that the principal competitive factors in the LAN equipment market
include the completeness of product offerings, product quality, price and
performance, adherence to industry standards, the degree of interoperability
with other networking equipment and time to market for new products. We believe
that we compete favorably with respect to each of these factors. In particular,
we believe that our true stacking Layer 3 switch solutions compete very
favorably with respect to price when compared to other Layer 3 switches
available today.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Our success is dependent upon our proprietary technology. The core of our
proprietary technology is the NuWaveArchitecture and our proprietary ASICs. We
rely principally upon copyright, trademark and trade secret laws to protect our
proprietary technology. We generally enter into confidentiality or license
agreements with employees, suppliers, customers and potential customers,
limiting or prohibiting their disclosure of our proprietary information.
Although we hold one U.S. patent covering technology of our legacy products, we
do not own any patents or have pending patent applications associated with our
NuWaveArchitecture.
We seek to protect our proprietary rights and other intellectual property
through a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret protection, as
well as through contractual protections such as proprietary information
agreements and nondisclosure agreements. We also believe that factors such as
the technological and creative skills of our personnel, new product
developments, frequent product enhancements and reliable product maintenance are
essential to establishing and maintaining a technology leadership position.
We generally enter into confidentiality or license agreements with our
employees, consultants and corporate partners, and generally control access to
and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary
information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized
parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or
technology. Monitoring unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and there
can be no assurance that the steps taken by us will prevent misappropriation of
our technology, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect
our proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States.
7
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The executive officers of NPI and their ages are as follows:
Name Age Position
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William Rosenberger 50 President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Robert Zecha 42 Vice President, Research and Development
James Sullivan 47 Vice President, Sales
Wilson Cheung 36 Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Joseph Botta 59 Vice President, Operations
Jerry McDowell 54 Vice President, Marketing
William Rosenberger has served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and a
director of NPI since July 1998. From January 1996 to June 1998, Mr. Rosenberger
was President and Chief Executive Officer of NetAccess, Inc., a wide area
networking equipment manufacturer. From October 1995 to December 1995, Mr.
Rosenberger was Vice President of Sales and Business Development for NetVision
Corporation, an Ethernet switching company. From March 1993 to June 1995, Mr.
Rosenberger was General Manager of ACSYS, Inc., a networking equipment
manufacturer. Prior to March 1993, Mr. Rosenberger was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Netronix, Inc., a networking hardware designer and
manufacturer.
Robert Zecha has served as Vice President of Research and Development of NPI
since April 1997. From January 1997 to April 1997, Mr. Zecha served as President
and Chief Technology Officer of NetVision Corporation, an Ethernet switching
company. From November 1993 to January 1997, Mr. Zecha was a Vice President and
Chief Technology Officer of NetVision Corporation. Mr. Zecha was a director of
NetVision Corporation from November 1993 through April 1997. Prior to November
1993, Mr. Zecha held engineering management positions at Standard Microsystems
Corporation, a networking company.
James Sullivan has served as Vice President of Sales since joining NPI in
October 1997. From July 1985 to July 1997, he held several sales management
positions with Novell, Inc., including Vice President of Worldwide OEM Sales and
Senior Director of North American Channel Sales.
Wilson Cheung has served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of NPI since October 1998. Preceding the appointment to this office, Mr.
Cheung held various management positions since joining NPI in July 1995. From
July 1994 to June 1995, Mr. Cheung was a financial analyst at Sybase Inc., a
software company. From 1991 through June 1994, Mr. Cheung held various senior
financial analyst positions at Raychem Corp., a materials component company.
From 1988 to 1991, Mr. Cheung was a senior auditor at Coopers & Lybrand.
Joseph Botta has served as Vice President of Operations of NPI since June 1999.
Previously, Mr. Botta was the Principal Owner of Silver Creek Investments. From
March 1997 through November 1997, he was the Vice President of Operations at ACT
Networks, Inc., a wide-area network access products manufacturer. From 1988 to
1997, he held various management positions at Whittaker Corporation, a
networking company, most recently serving as Executive Vice President.
Jerry McDowell has been Vice President of Marketing of NPI since November 1998.
From June 1996 to November 1998 he was President and Executive Director of
Research of The Robert Frances Group, a syndicated market research firm which he
co-founded. From March 1994 to November 1996, Mr. McDowell was Senior Director
of Marketing and Business Development at Objective Systems Integrators, a
software company. Mr. McDowell has also served in executive and management
positions at Dataquest, the Meta Group, Wang Laboratories, Paradyne and others.
* As of December 31, 1999
8
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 1999, we employed 145 people, including 31 in research and
development, 32 in sales, marketing and technical, 61 in manufacturing
operations and 21 in finance and administration. Of those employees, 71 were in
international locations. None of our employees is represented by a labor union.
We consider our relations with our employees to be good. Competition for
employees in our industry and geographical areas is intense, and there can be no
assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Our principal executive offices are located in Fremont, California, and consist
of 22,500 square feet under a lease that will expire in October 2004.
Additionally, we have research and development facilities in Long Island, New
York and manufacturing facilities in Taiwan. The property on which our Taiwan
facility is located is currently in receivership. If, as a result of this
receivership, we are unable to maintain our lease of this property, we may need
to relocate our facility. There is no guarantee that we will be able to find a
suitable replacement facility on equal terms or of sufficient quality. We have
international sales offices in the Netherlands and Taiwan, as well as satellite
offices in Los Angeles, California and Boston, Massachusetts. We expect that
these existing facilities will be generally adequate to meet our immediate and
foreseeable needs.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising
out of our operations. As of the date of this Annual Report, we are not a party
to any legal proceedings that are expected, individually or in the aggregate, to
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of the year ended December 31, 1999.
9
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
Our Common Stock is traded in the over-the-counter market on the Nasdaq National
Market. As of January 25, 2000, there were approximately 120 stockholders of
record. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, the
high and low closing prices for the Common Stock, all as reported by Nasdaq.
1997 High Low
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
First Quarter $20.88 $ 8.63
Second Quarter 10.94 6.50
Third Quarter 7.94 5.38
Fourth Quarter 7.25 4.94
1998
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
First Quarter $ 8.69 $ 6.25
Second Quarter 6.94 3.75
Third Quarter 4.88 3.00
Fourth Quarter 4.88 2.31
1999
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
First Quarter $ 7.25 $ 3.69
Second Quarter 19.38 5.75
Third Quarter 19.94 16.00
Fourth Quarter 47.75 18.88
We have never paid or declared any cash dividends. It is our present policy to
retain earnings to finance the growth and development of the business and,
therefore, we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our Common Stock in the
foreseeable future.
10
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Years Ended December 31,
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net sales $ 10,231 $28,585 $ 34,798 $ 53,080 $47,144
Cost of sales 9,410 17,250 25,341 28,590 24,690
----------------------------------------------------
Gross profit 821 11,335 9,457 24,490 22,454
----------------------------------------------------
Operating expenses:
Research and development 7,803 11,485 9,757 8,570 4,811
Marketing and selling 6,437 6,010 13,242 11,849 7,319
General and administrative 3,503 3,234 3,982 3,378 2,226
Gain on sale of assets (1,055) - - - -
Acquired research and development in process - - 6,462 13,732 -
Restructuring expense - - 3,662 - -
----------------------------------------------------
Total operating expenses 16,688 20,729 37,105 37,529 14,356
----------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) from operations (15,867) (9,394) (27,648) (13,039) 8,098
Interest income 908 1,505 1,680 1,745 2,236
----------------------------------------------------
Income (loss) before income taxes (14,959) (7,889) (25,968) (11,294) 10,334
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes - - (3,526) 608 3,617
----------------------------------------------------
Net income (loss) $(14,959) $(7,889) $(22,442) $(11,902) $ 6,717
====================================================
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic $ (1.19) $ (0.64) $ (1.85) $ (1.01) $ 0.60
====================================================
Diluted $ (1.19) $ (0.64) $ (1.85) $ (1.01) $ 0.57
====================================================
Weighted average common shares:
Basic 12,584 12,281 12,154 11,760 11,147
====================================================
Diluted 12,584 12,281 12,154 11,760 11,736
====================================================
December 31,
1999 1998 1997 1996 1995
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments $ 9,715 $23,351 $ 30,465 $ 45,873 $52,141
Working capital 12,565 26,070 34,439 54,997 63,269
Total assets 20,852 35,549 45,889 71,434 70,111
Stockholders' equity 17,909 30,972 38,679 59,857 65,709
11
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following forward-looking statements are made in reliance upon the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The
future events described in such statements involve risks and uncertainties,
including:
. the timely development and market acceptance of our new products;
. the market demand by customers for our existing products, including demand
by OEM customers for custom products;
. competitive actions, including pricing actions and the introduction of new
competitive products, that may affect the volume of sales of our products;
. uninterrupted supply of key components, including semiconductor devices and
other materials, some of which may be sourced from a single supplier;
. uninterrupted service by contract manufacturers;
. our ability to recruit, train and retain key personnel, including engineers
and other technical professionals;
. the development of new technologies rendering our existing technologies and
products obsolete;
. the economies of countries where our products are distributed; and
. general market conditions.
In evaluating these forward-looking statements, consideration should also be
given to the Business Risks discussed in a subsequent section of this annual
report.
OVERVIEW
We were incorporated in California in March 1989 and were reincorporated in
Delaware in 1994. Our initial business focus was on networking products based on
fiber distributed data interface, or FDDI, technology, and we obtained a
significant share of the market for FDDI adapter products in the early 1990s.
Because the market for FDDI-based products declined significantly beginning in
1995, we developed a new line of Layer 2 Fast Ethernet switching products that
we first shipped in early 1996. By 1998, the market for our FDDI-based products
and our Layer 2 Fast Ethernet products (together, our "legacy products")
declined substantially, and we committed nearly all of our resources to the
development of a new line of Layer 3 Gigabit Ethernet switches founded on our
NuWaveArchitecture. A substantial portion of our operating expenses in 1998 and
1999 was related to the design and development of our custom ASICs, the
development of network management software and the testing of prototype designs.
We commenced limited commercial shipments of the first product in this line, the
Keystone24g, in December 1999. We anticipate that substantially all of our
revenues in future periods will be derived from sales of products based on the
NuWaveArchitecture and that sales of our legacy products will decline to
immaterial levels by the end of 2000.
We derived substantially all of our revenue in 1999 from sales of our legacy
products with sales to Sun Microsystems accounting for 36% of our revenue. The
balance of the sales in 1999 was to other OEMs and to the reseller channel. We
derived 56% of our revenues from sales to customers in North America, 30% of our
revenues from sales to customers in Asia and 14% of our revenues from sales to
customers in Europe. For our NuWave product line in 2000, we intend to focus our
sales and marketing efforts on developing and expanding our OEM customer base,
and to a lesser extent, to continue servicing existing reseller customers while
seeking new opportunities in the reseller channel. We have sales offices in the
United States, Taiwan and the Netherlands. All sales are denominated in U.S.
dollars. We generally recognize product revenue upon shipment, provided that no
significant obligations remain and collectibility is probable. Revenue from
customer support agreements is deferred and recognized ratably over the term of
the agreement.
Cost of revenue is comprised principally of payments to our materials suppliers,
contract manufacturers, final assembly costs, manufacturing and quality
functions, inventory management costs and certain product costs. We expect our
gross profit to be affected by many factors, including:
. declines in the average selling price of our products;
. fluctuations in demand for our products;
. the volume of products sold;
. the mix of products and services sold;
. the mix of sales channels through which our products are sold; and
. new product introductions both by us and our competitors.
12
Generally, we realize higher margins on sales to the reseller channel than on
sales to OEMs. Any change in the mix between the channels or the loss of a major
customer could adversely affect our gross margin, operating results and
financial condition. We experienced significant erosion in the average selling
prices of our legacy products, and we anticipate that the average selling prices
of our products based on the NuWaveArchitecture will decrease from their levels
at introduction and fluctuate in the future. Therefore, to maintain or increase
our gross margins, we must develop and introduce new products and enhancements
on a timely basis. We must also continually reduce our costs of production. As
our average selling prices decline, we must increase our unit sales volume to
maintain or increase our revenue.
We intend to allocate materials procurement, product assembly and test
engineering in reliability and burn-in between our own manufacturing facility
and Solectron, our contract manufacturer, to obtain optimal production
efficiencies. We will continue to perform component and supplier qualification,
quality assurance and document control at our facilities. We believe that this
strategy will enable us to achieve lower costs if volumes increase.
In transitioning from our legacy business to our NuWave business, we have
incurred significant losses in the past three years primarily reflecting
declining revenues of legacy products in conjunction with substantial
investments in research and development to bring NuWave products to market.
Although we expect revenues to increase upon volume shipment of the entire
NuWave family of products in the early part of 2000, we cannot assure you that
such revenues will exceed production costs and operating expenses in the same
periods.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Sales
Our net sales were $10.2, $28.6 and $34.8 million in 1999, 1998 and 1997,
respectively. The decrease reflected declining demand of FDDI and Fast Ethernet
legacy products, as the technology of these products reached maturity. In 1999,
sales of Fast Ethernet products represented 51% of net sales with the balance
attributed to FDDI products. Net sales to OEM customers declined to $5.2 million
in 1999 from $19.4 and $22.0 million in 1998 and 1997, respectively. Net sales
to the reseller channel followed the same trend, declining to $5.0 million in
1999 from $9.2 and $12.8 million in 1998 and 1997, respectively. Net sales to
customers in North America were $5.7, $19.7 and $25.8 million in 1999, 1998 and
1997, respectively. The balance of net sales of $4.5, $8.9 and $9.0 million in
1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively, were to Asia and Europe.
Gross Profit/Margin
Our gross margin in 1999 was 8%, compared to gross margins of 40% and 27% in
1998 and 1997, respectively. The erosion of gross margin in 1999 primarily
reflected the competitive pricing pressures on the Fast Ethernet products as
this market reached the commodity stage. Further, the decline in production
volume of all legacy products resulted in under-utilization of our manufacturing
facilities and excess overhead charges. The improvement in gross margin from
1997 to 1998 was due to restructuring actions taken in 1997, which included the
write-off of slow-moving and obsolete inventories and a one-time charge
associated with the transfer of manufacturing facilities.
Research and Development
Our research and development expenses were $7.8, $11.5 and $9.8 million, in
1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively. Research and development expenses in 1997
were net of contract funding of $217,000. No contract funding was received in
1999 and 1998. The focus of our research and development efforts since 1997,
pursuant to the acquisition of NetVision Corporation, was principally on the
development of the NuWaveArchitecture. We began diverting our resources away
from our legacy products in the third quarter of 1997 as part of the
restructuring described below. The diversion of resources continued through June
1999, when the we completely ceased further investment in legacy products,
except for sustaining engineering and warranty support, by divesting the
engineering group responsible for such development efforts (see "Gain on Sale of
Assets" below).
Accordingly, the decrease in research and development expenses in 1999 from 1998
primarily reflected reduction in compensation, overhead costs and project costs
associated with the termination of legacy product development, including the
divestiture of our research and development office in Taiwan. The increase in
expenses from 1997 to 1998 was primarily attributed to the deployment of
resources in the development of the NuWaveArchitecture. These resources included
outside consultants and contract engineering services used to develop the
proprietary ASICs and network management software. The increase in expenses in
1998 was also attributed to a one-time charge of approximately $500,000 incurred
in connection with the elimination of non-critical personnel in research and
development, in an effort to further streamline operations.
13
Marketing and Selling
Marketing and selling expenses were $6.4, $6.0 and $13.2 million in 1999, 1998
and 1997, respectively. In 1997, we realigned our marketing and sales strategy
to focus on broadening our OEM customer base, rather than penetrating the
distribution channel, which was the focus of previous sales and marketing
efforts. An OEM-based strategy required substantially less sales and marketing
resources, in particular a smaller sales force and less advertising and
promotion expenditures directed at brand name recognition. However, the
deployment of our renewed strategy required the addition of personnel with
expertise in the development of OEM relationships.
Accordingly, in 1999 and in the latter part of 1998, we added staff to the sales
and marketing group, including technicians and senior management, and redirected
advertising campaigns to draw OEM interest, which was reflected in the increased
spending in 1999 compared to 1998. The decrease in spending from 1997 to 1998
was primarily attributed to the restructuring described below, which included
reducing staff and closure of regional sales offices, and the termination of
marketing programs directed at the distribution channel.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses were $3.5, $3.2 and $4.0 million in 1999,
1998 and 1997, respectively. In 1999, we incurred higher professional fees,
which was the primary factor to increased expenses in 1999 compared to 1998.
These professional fees included the engagement of an investor relations firm
and increased fees paid to information system consultants to prepare us for year
2000 issues (see "Year 2000 Compliance" below). The decrease in expenses from
1997 to 1998 was primarily the result of diminished fees to third parties,
including renegotiated insurance costs and consulting fees, and the realization
of reduced staff associated with the restructuring described below.
Acquired Research and Development In Process
In April 1997, we acquired NetVision Corporation, a company specializing in LAN
switching and Gigabit Ethernet technologies. We expensed $6.5 million of
acquired research and development in process as a result of the acquisition. See
Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Restructuring
In the third quarter of 1997, we incurred a charge of $3.7 million for the
restructuring of our business. The restructuring included a reduction in work
force, closure of certain sales and manufacturing facilities, retirement of
impaired assets and write-off of goodwill associated with the acquisition of
NuCom Systems Inc. in 1996. We completed the restructuring in the second quarter
of 1998. See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Gain on Sale of Assets
In connection with the sale of our research and development facilities in Hsin-
chu, Taiwan, which was completed in June 1999, we recorded a gain of $1,055,000,
net of payments of broker fees and severance of $216,000. The divestiture of
this office was completed in an effort to reduce our investment in the legacy
products and to focus our resources on the commercialization of NuWave products.
Interest Income
Interest income was $908,000 in 1999, compared to $1.5 and $1.7 million in 1998
and 1997. The decrease was primarily a reflection of the declining aggregate
balance of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments during the three
years ended 1999. Despite a lower fund balance in 1998 compared to 1997, the
return on investments did not decline in direct relation to the balance. This
resulted from a higher rate of return which reflected a shift from short-term
investments in tax-exempt securities to taxable corporate securities in mid-
1997.
Income Taxes
We did not record a tax benefit associated with the net loss incurred in 1999
and 1998, as we deemed that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets will not be realized based on evidence available and, accordingly, a full
valuation allowance was provided. During 1998, we received an income tax refund
of $4 million as a result of the carryback claim of the 1997 net operating loss
to offset net income recognized in 1995 and 1994. The related tax benefit was
fully recognized in 1997. Our effective tax rate for 1997 was a benefit of
13.6%, which reflected a net loss and a full valuation allowance provided
against
14
deferred tax assets. The effective tax benefit rate for 1997 was reduced due to
the charge for acquired research and development in process, which was non-
deductible for income tax purposes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No.
133, "Accounting for Derivative and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133
establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for
hedging activities. In July 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date
of FASB Statement No. 133." SFAS No. 137 deferred the effective date of SFAS No.
133 until fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. We will adopt SFAS No. 133
during its year ending December 31, 2001. To date, we have not engaged in
derivative or hedging activities. We are unable to predict the impact of
adopting SFAS No. 133 if we were to engage in derivative and hedging activity in
the future.
Euro Conversion
We have a wholly-owned subsidiary in the Netherlands, which is one of the 11
European countries participating in the adoption of a common currency, the Euro,
on January 1, 1999. Following the introduction of the Euro, the legacy currency
in each participating country remains as legal tender until January 1, 2002.
During the transition period, either the Euro or the legacy currency may be used
to pay for goods and services. Beginning January 1, 2002, participating
countries will issue new Euro-denominated bills and coins, and the legacy
currency will no longer be the legal tender for any transactions after July 1,
2002.
Our subsidiary in the Netherlands is a sales office for the entire European
region. Sales made to all European countries are denominated in US dollars.
Expenses incurred by this subsidiary are currently paid in guilders, the legacy
currency. In 1999 and 1998, sales to all European customers accounted for 14%
and 10%, respectively, of our total sales, and 6% of our total operating
expenses in both 1999 and 1998 were attributed to this subsidiary. Due to the
immateriality of expenses of the Netherlands subsidiary relative to our
operations as a whole, we believe the Euro conversion will not have any
significant impact to our results of operations during and after the transition
period.
Year 2000 Compliance
Although the date is now past January 1, 2000, we have not experienced an
immediate adverse impact from the transition to the Year 2000. However, we
cannot provide assurance that we or our suppliers and customers have not been
affected in a manner that is not yet apparent. In addition, some computer
programs that were date sensitive to the Year 2000 may not have been programmed
to process the Year 2000 as a leap year, and any negative consequential effects
remain unknown. As a result, we will continue to monitor our Year 2000
compliance and the Year 2000 compliance of our suppliers and customers.
15
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our working capital was $12.6 million and $26.1 million at December 31, 1999 and
December 31, 1998, respectively, and the current ratio (ratio of current assets
to current liabilities) was 5.3 to 1 and 6.7 to 1, respectively. The aggregate
balance of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased to $9.7
million at December 31, 1999 from $23.4 million at December 31, 1998. The
decrease was primarily due to cash used to finance operations and capital
expenditures. In 1999, net cash used in operating activities was $13.6 million,
which was principally attributed to the net loss for the year of $15.0 million,
partially offset by a net decrease in accounts receivable of $3 million. In
1998, net cash used in operating activities was $4.2 million, which was
attributed to the net loss for the year of $7.9 million, partially offset by the
collection of an income tax refund of $4.0 million.
Our capital expenditures totaled $2.6 million in both 1999 and 1998. In 1999, we
relocated our corporate headquarters to a larger facility in Fremont,
California. Capital expenditures for the move, including leasehold improvements,
totaled approximately $700,000. The balance of the expenditures in 1999 was
principally for the purchase of design equipment and software licenses for the
development of the NuWaveArchitecture, as well as test equipment for our quality
assurance laboratory. In 1998, the expenditures included the purchase of a SMT
line, or equipment for advanced manufacturing, totaling $600,000. The remainder
of the expenditures was for equipment and licenses used in the design of ASICs.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments. We also have a $5 million revolving bank line of credit, which
expires on May 31, 2000. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at
the lower of the bank's prime rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate plus
2.5% and are secured by our receivables, inventory, and other tangible assets.
There were no borrowings under the line of credit in 1999 and 1998. Under the
line of credit, we are required to maintain at least $8 million in cash, cash
equivalents and short term investments. As of December 31, 1999, we were in
compliance with this requirement.
In the first half of 2000, with the authorization by our Board of Directors, we
intend to increase our working capital by issuing common shares in a follow-on
public offering. The net proceeds from this follow-on public offering are
expected to be used for general corporate purposes, which may include the
purchase of equipment and the expansion of operations. We also may use a portion
of the net proceeds to acquire or invest in businesses, technologies, products
or services that are complementary to our business. From time to time we have
discussed potential strategic acquisitions and investments with third parties.
We are not currently in discussions regarding any acquisitions or investments
and have no agreements or commitments to complete any such transaction.
We believe that our current balance of cash, cash equivalents, and short-term
investments, together with proceeds from the follow-on public offering, will be
sufficient to satisfy our working capital and capital expenditure requirements
for the next 12 months.
BUSINESS RISKS
If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition
or operating results could be materially adversely affected. The risks set forth
below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not
presently known to us, or that we currently see as immaterial, may also harm our
business.
We have a history of losses, expect future losses and cannot assure you that we
will achieve profitability.
We have experienced net losses in each of the last four fiscal years, and we
cannot be certain that we will realize sufficient revenue to achieve
profitability. We expect that we will continue to incur significant sales and
marketing and product development costs associated with the recent introduction
of the Gigabit Ethernet products based on our NuWaveArchitecture. Consequently,
we will need to generate significantly higher revenue to achieve and sustain
profitability. If sales of our NuWaveArchitecture products do not meet our
expectations, we will continue to experience losses indefinitely. In addition,
we have discontinued production of the Layer 2 Fast Ethernet and FDDI products
that accounted for our historical revenues. We intend to complete end-of-life
sales of these products in the first half of 2000. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to sell all inventory relating to these products. If we are
required to write-off any unsold inventory, our operating results could be
adversely affected.
Substantially all of our future revenue depends on the commercial success of
products based on our NuWaveArchitecture, and if these products do not achieve
market acceptance, our business will be seriously harmed.
Substantially all of our future revenue depends on the commercial success of
products based on our NuWaveArchitecture. We recently introduced the first
product based on our NuWaveArchitecture, and we intend to introduce several new
products based on this technology in the near future.
16
If these products fail to meet the needs of our target customers, or if they do
not compare favorably in price and performance to competing solutions, our
revenue will not grow. We cannot assure you that these products will achieve
market acceptance. We have made only limited sales of these products, and it is
possible that they may not satisfy our customers' requirements. Failure of
products based on our NuWaveArchitecture to satisfy our customers' requirements
could delay or prevent their adoption. If our target customers do not widely
adopt, purchase and successfully deploy our new products, our revenue will not
grow significantly, or possibly at all, and our business, financial condition
and results of operations will be seriously harmed.
A number of factors could cause our quarterly and annual financial results to be
worse than expected, which could result in a decline in our stock price.
To support anticipated sales of our NuWaveArchitecture products, we plan to
increase our operating expenses to expand our sales and marketing activities,
broaden our customer support capabilities, develop new distribution channels and
fund increased levels of research and development. We base our operating
expenses on anticipated revenue trends, and a high percentage of our expenses
are fixed in the short term. Consequently, any delay or failure in generating
revenue could cause our quarterly and annual operating results to be below the
expectations of public market analysts or investors, which could cause the price
of our common stock to decline.
We may fail or experience a delay in generating revenue for a number of reasons.
Our customer agreements typically provide that the customer may delay scheduled
delivery dates and cancel orders within specified time frames without
significant penalty. Accordingly, we may incur significant expenses without
meeting corresponding anticipated revenue levels for a given period. In
addition, the timing of product releases, purchase orders and product
availability could result in significant product shipments scheduled for the end
of a quarter. Failure to ship these products by the end of a quarter may
adversely affect our operating results.
Our periodic revenue and operating results have varied significantly in the past
and may vary significantly in the future due to a number of factors, including:
. market acceptance of and demand for our NuWaveArchitecture products;
. decreased average selling prices of our products
. unexpected product returns or the cancellation or rescheduling of
significant orders;
. our ability to develop, introduce, ship and support new products and
product enhancements and manage product transitions;
. announcements and new product introductions by our competitors;
. our ability to achieve cost reductions;
. our ability to obtain sufficient supplies of components for our
products for which we rely on sole or limited source suppliers;
. increased prices of the components we purchase;
. our ability to attain and maintain production volumes and quality
levels for our products;
. the mix of products sold and the mix of distribution channels through
which they are sold; and
. costs relating to possible acquisitions and integration of
technologies or businesses.
Due to the foregoing factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of
our operating results should not be relied upon as an indicator of our future
performance.
17
Intense competition in the market for LAN equipment could prevent us from
increasing revenue or achieving or sustaining profitability.
The market for local area network, or LAN, equipment is intensely competitive.
Our principal competitors include Alcatel, Bay Networks, Cabletron Systems,
Cisco Systems, Ericsson, Extreme Networks, Foundry Networks, Lucent
Technologies, Nortel Networks, Siemens, and 3Com. Many of our current and
potential competitors have substantially greater financial, technical, sales,
marketing and other resources, as well as greater name recognition and larger
installed customer bases, than we do. These competitors have developed or could
in the future develop new technologies that compete with our products or even
render our products obsolete. We believe that this market will consolidate over
time and that this consolidation could adversely affect our ability to compete
effectively. A number of companies developing technologies similar to ours have
been acquired by our larger competitors. These acquisitions are likely to permit
our competitors to devote significantly greater resources to the development and
marketing of new competitive products and the marketing of existing products to
their installed bases. We expect that competition will increase as a result of
these and other industry consolidations and alliances.
To remain competitive, we believe we must, among other things, invest
significant resources in developing new products with superior performance at
competitive prices, enhance our NuWaveArchitecture products and maintain
customer satisfaction. If we fail to do so, our products may not compete
favorably, and our revenue and future profitability could suffer.
The average selling prices of our products may decrease rapidly, which may
reduce gross margins or revenue if we are unable to reduce our cost of goods
sold.
The enterprise LAN equipment industry has experienced rapid erosion of average
selling prices due to a number of factors, including competitive pricing
pressures and rapid technological change. We may experience substantial period-
to-period fluctuations in future operating results due to the erosion of our
average selling prices. We anticipate that the average selling prices of our
products will decrease in the future in response to competitive pricing
pressures, increased sales discounts, new product introductions by us or our
competitors or other factors. Therefore, to maintain our gross margins, we must
develop and introduce on a timely basis new products and product enhancements
and continually reduce our product costs. As the average selling prices for our
products are expected to decline, we will need to reduce our product costs,
particularly the cost of our ASICs. To reduce the cost of ASICs we intend to
integrate chips and reduce die sizes. However, we cannot be certain when or if
such price reductions will occur. Our failure to achieve cost reductions would
cause our revenue and gross margins to decline, which would harm affect our
operating results.
We must develop and expand our OEM relationships and other indirect distribution
channels to increase revenue and improve our operating results.
Our distribution strategy focuses primarily on developing and expanding indirect
distribution channels through original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs and, to
a lesser extent, resellers, as well as expanding our field sales organization.
If we fail to develop and cultivate relationships with significant OEMs, or if
these OEMs are not successful in their product development and sales efforts,
sales of our products may fail to increase and may even decrease. Our ability to
generate increased revenue depends significantly upon the ability and
willingness of our OEM customers to develop and promote products that
incorporate our technology on a timely basis. If our OEM customers do not
successfully market the solutions that incorporate our products, then sales of
our products to our OEM customers will be adversely affected. The ability and
willingness of OEM customers to develop and promote our products is based upon a
number of factors beyond our control. In addition, some of our current and
potential OEM customers could develop products internally that would replace our
products. The resulting lost sales of our products to any such OEMs, in addition
to the increased competition presented by these OEMs, could harm our business,
financial condition and operating results.
Although we have secured a limited number of OEM customers for our
NuWaveArchitecture products, nearly all of these customers are still at the
early stages of initial commercial shipments. If our OEM customers are unable to
or otherwise do not ship systems that are based on our products, or if their
shipped systems are not commercially successful, our business, operating results
or financial condition could suffer.
In order to support for our indirect distribution channels, we plan to expand
our field sales and support staff. We cannot assure you that this internal
expansion will be successfully completed, that the cost of this expansion will
not exceed the revenue generated or that our expanded sales and support staff
will be able to compete successfully against the significantly more extensive
and well-funded sales and marketing operations of many of our current or
potential competitors. Our inability to effectively establish our distribution
channel s or manage the expansion of our sales and support staff
could limit our ability to grow and increase revenue.
Our market is subject to rapid technological change, and we must continually
introduce new products that achieve broad market acceptance to compete
effectively.
The LAN equipment market is characterized by rapid technological change,
frequent new product introductions, changes in customer requirements and
evolving industry standards. If we do not address these changes by regularly
introducing new products, our product line will become obsolete. Developments in
routers and routing software could also
18
significantly reduce demand for our products. Alternative technologies could
achieve widespread market acceptance and displace the the Ethernet technology on
which our product lines and architecture are based. We cannot assure you that
our technological approach will achieve broad market acceptance or that other
technologies or devices will not supplant our approach.
When we announce new products or product enhancements that have the potential to
replace or shorten the life cycle of our existing products, customers may defer
purchasing our existing products. These actions could harm our operating results
by unexpectedly decreasing sales, increasing our inventory levels of older
products and exposing us to greater risk of product obsolescence. The market for
enterprise LAN switching products is evolving, and we believe our ability to
compete successfully in this market is dependent upon the continued
compatibility and interoperability of our products with products offered by
other vendors. In particular, the networking industry has been characterized by
the successive introduction of new technologies and standards that have
dramatically reduced the price and increased the performance of enterprise LAN
equipment. To remain competitive, we need to introduce products in a timely
manner that incorporate or are compatible with these new technologies as they
emerge. We may experience delays in product development in the future, and any
delay in product introduction could adversely affect our ability to compete and
cause our operating results to be below our expectations or the expectations of
public market analysts or investors.
Because we expect to depend on a small number of OEM and distribution channel
customers for a significant portion of our revenue in any period, the loss of
any of these customers or any cancellation or delay of a large purchase by any
of these customers could significantly reduce our revenue.
Our sales strategy is to focus on selling our NuWaveArchitecture products to OEM
customers, and we anticipate that, although our largest customers may vary from
period-to-period, a small number of key OEM customers will account for a
significant portion of our revenues in each fiscal period. We cannot assure you
that we will be able to obtain OEM customers, and even if we are successful,
this strategy will pose a number of significant risks. The loss of any key OEM
customers, or a significant reduction in sales to those customers, could
significantly reduce our revenue below anticipated levels. Because our expense
levels are based on our expectations as to future revenue and to a large extent
are fixed in the short term, a substantial reduction or delay in sales of our
products to, or the loss of any significant OEM, reseller or other customer, or
unexpected returns from resellers could harm our business, operating results and
financial condition.
While we expect that our financial performance in any given period will depend
on orders from a small number of OEMs, resellers and other significant
customers, we do not have contracts with customers binding them to minimum
purchase quantities, except as set forth in a particular purchase orders. For
example:
. our customers can stop purchasing, and our OEMs and resellers can stop
marketing our products, at any time;
. our reseller agreements generally are not exclusive and are for one
year terms, with no obligation of the resellers to renew the
agreements; and
. our OEM and reseller agreements provide for discounts based on
expected or actual volumes of products purchased or resold by the
reseller in a given period.
In the future we expect to establish a program which, under specified
conditions, enables some distributors to return products to us. The amount of
potential product returns will be estimated and provided for in the period of
the sale; however, we cannot assure you that our estimates will be adequate to
cover actual returns.
The sales cycle for our products is long, and we may incur substantial non-
recoverable expenses or devote significant resources to sales that do not occur
when anticipated.
Our sales cycle, particularly to OEMs, typically involves a lengthy
qualification process during which we generally invest significant resources to
address customer specifications. Because of the length of the sales cycle, we
may experience delays between increasing expenses for research and development
and sales and marketing efforts and the generation of higher revenue, if any,
from such expenditures. If sales forecasted from a specific customer for a
particular quarter are not realized in that quarter, we may be unable to
compensate for the shortfall, which could harm our
19
operating results. The purchase of our products or of solutions that incorporate
our products typically involves significant internal procedures associated with
the evaluation, testing, implementation and acceptance of new technologies. This
evaluation process frequently results in a lengthy sales process, typically
ranging from three months to longer than a year, and subjects each sale to a
number of significant risks, including budgetary constraints and internal
acceptance reviews. The length of our sales cycle also may vary substantially
from customer to customer.
We purchase several key components for our products from single or limited
sources and could lose sales if these sources fail to meet our needs.
We currently purchase several key components used in the manufacture of our
products from single or limited sources and depend upon supply from these
sources to meet our needs. We may encounter shortages and delays in obtaining
components in the future that materially adversely affect our ability to meet
customer orders. In particular, NEC Corporation is the sole manufacturer of the
ASICs that form the core of our NuWave Architecture products. We do not have a
long-term supply contract with NEC that obligates them to continue to supply
components to us, and it is possible that they could allocate their resources to
their other customers in the future, which could materially disrupt our ability
to manufacture our products and meet customer demands. Qualifying an alternative
manufacturer of our ASICs would be time consuming, costly and disruptive. In
addition, we acquire certain microprocessors and other integrated circuits as
well as a custom designed power supply from sole source suppliers. While we
believe we could qualify alternative suppliers for these products, any delays
caused by supply disruptions could result in increased component prices that
could adversely affect our gross margins. We also use certain components
including memory components and printed circuit boards, that we acquire from
limited sources that create risks similar to those created by our sole source
supply arrangements.
We use a rolling 12-month forecast based on anticipated product orders to
determine our material requirements. Lead times for materials and components we
order vary significantly and depend on factors such as the specific supplier,
contract terms and market demand for a component at a given time. If orders do
not match forecasts, we may have excess or inadequate inventory of certain
materials and components, which could materially adversely affect our operating
results and financial condition. From time to time we have experienced shortages
and allocations of certain components, resulting in delays in filling orders. In
the future we may again experience these shortages, particularly with respect to
the supply of semiconductors.
We may need to expand or relocate our manufacturing operations and may depend on
contract manufacturers for a significant portion of our manufacturing
requirements.
We currently manufacture all of our products at our facility in Taiwan. If the
demand for our products grows, we will need to increase our material purchases,
internal manufacturing capacity and internal test and quality functions. Any
disruptions in product flow could limit our revenue, adversely affect our
competitive position and reputation and result in additional costs or
cancellation of orders under agreements with our customers. The property on
which our Taiwan facility is located is currently in receivership. If, as a
result of this receivership, we are unable to maintain our lease of this
property, we may need to relocate our facility. There is no guarantee that we
will be able to find a suitable replacement facility on equal terms or of
sufficient quality.
We have augmented our manufacturing capacity by entering into an agreement with
Solectron Corporation, a contract manufacturer, to manufacture a portion of our
product requirements. As a result of entering into this agreement we may
experience, among others, the following problems, any of which could materially
adversely affect our business and operating results:
. delays in product shipments;
20
. reduced control over quality and quantity of products; and
. interruption in the supply of products caused by, among other factors,
the loss of a contract manufacturer.
If we lose key personnel or are unable to hire additional qualified personnel as
necessary, we may not be able to successfully manage our business or achieve our
objectives.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of
our key management, engineering, sales and marketing, finance and manufacturing
personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. In particular, we believe
that our future success is highly dependent on William Rosenberger, our
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Robert Zecha, our Vice President,
Research and Development. We do not have key person insurance covering any of
our personnel.
We believe our future success will also depend in large part upon our ability to
attract and retain highly skilled managerial, engineering, sales and marketing,
finance and manufacturing personnel. Competition for these personnel is intense
and we have had difficulty hiring employees, particularly software engineers, in
the timeframe we desire. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in
attracting and retaining the personnel we require. The loss of the services of
any of our key personnel, the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel
in the future, or delays in hiring required personnel, particularly engineers
and sales personnel, could make it difficult for us to manage our business and
meet key objectives. In addition, companies in the networking industry whose
employees accept positions with competitors frequently claim that competitors
have engaged in unfair hiring practices. We could incur substantial costs in
defending ourselves against any such claims, regardless of the merits of such
claims.
If our products do not comply with evolving industry standards and complex
government regulations, they may not achieve market acceptance, which may
prevent us from increasing our revenue or achieving profitability.
The market for LAN equipment is characterized by the need to support
industry standards as they emerge, evolve and achieve acceptance. We will not be
competitive unless we continually introduce new products and product
enhancements that meet these emerging standards. We may not be able to
effectively address the compatibility and interoperability issues that arise as
a result of technological changes and evolving industry standards. In addition,
in the United States, our products must comply with various regulations and
standards defined by the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, and
Underwriters Laboratories. Internationally, products that we develop may be
required to comply with standards established by telecommunications authorities
in various countries as well as with recommendations of the International
Telecommunication Union. If we do not comply with existing or evolving industry
standards or if we fail to obtain timely domestic or foreign regulatory
approvals or certificates, we may experience delays in product shipments or be
unable to sell our products where these standards or regulations apply, which
could prevent us from increasing our revenue or achieving profitability.
We need to expand our sales and support organizations to increase market
acceptance of our products.
Our products and services require a sophisticated sales effort targeted at
several levels within a prospective customer's organization. We have recently
expanded our sales force and plan to hire additional sales personnel. Unless we
expand our sales force we will not be able to increase revenue. However,
competition for qualified sales personnel is intense, and we might not be able
to hire an adequate number of sales personnel.
We currently have a small customer service and support organization and will
need to increase our staff to support new customers and the expanding needs of
existing customers. The design and installation of networking products can be
complex. Accordingly, we need highly-trained customer service and support
personnel. Hiring customer service and support personnel is very competitive in
our industry due to the limited number of people available with the necessary
technical skills and understanding of our products.
Our ability to increase our revenue depends on successfully expanding our
international sales.
Our ability to grow will depend in part on our ability to increase sales of our
NuWaveArchitecture products to international customers, particularly in Asia.
We anticipate that sales to international customers will constitute a
significant portion of our future sales. There are a number of risks arising
from our international business, including:
21
. longer accounts receivable collection cycles;
. difficulties in managing operations across disparate geographic areas;
. difficulties associated with enforcing agreements under foreign legal
systems;
. import or export licensing requirements;
. potential adverse tax consequences; and
. unexpected changes in regulatory requirements.
Our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. As a result, an
increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could
make our products less competitive in international markets.
As part of our business strategy, we expect to review acquisition prospects that
would complement our current product offerings, augment our market coverage,
enhance our technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities.
While we have no current agreements or negotiations underway with respect to any
material acquisitions, we may acquire businesses, products or technologies in
the future. In the event of any future acquisitions, we could:
. issue equity securities which would dilute stockholders' percentage
ownership;
. incur substantial debt; or
. assume contingent liabilities.
Such actions by us could harm our operating results and cause the price of our
common stock to decline. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
successfully integrate any businesses, products, technologies or personnel that
we might acquire in the future, and our failure to do so could harm our
business, operating results and financial condition.
To fund our future operations, we may need additional capital which may not be
available when needed.
We believe that our existing working capital together with proceeds from the
follow-on public offering and cash available from future operations will enable
us to meet our working capital requirements for at least the next 12 months.
However, if cash from future operations is insufficient, or if cash is used for
acquisitions or other currently unanticipated uses, we may need additional
capital. The development and marketing of new products and the expansion of
distribution channels and associated support personnel are expected to require a
significant commitment of resources. In addition, if the market for enterprise
Layer 3 LAN switches were to develop more slowly than we anticipate, or if we
fail to establish
22
significant market share and achieve a meaningful level of revenue, we may
continue to incur significant operating losses and utilize significant amounts
of capital. As a result, we could be required to raise substantial additional
capital. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of
equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities could
result in dilution to existing stockholders. If we raise additional funds
through the issuance of debt securities, the securities would have rights,
preferences and privileges senior to holders of common stock and the terms of
such debt could impose restrictions on our operations. We cannot assure you that
additional capital, if required, will be available on acceptable terms, or at
all. If we are unable to obtain additional capital, we may be required to reduce
the scope of our planned product development and marketing efforts, which would
harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
If our products contain undetected software or hardware errors, we could incur
significant unexpected expenses and lost sales.
Complex LAN equipment frequently contains undetected software or hardware errors
when first introduced or as new versions are released. We have experienced these
errors in the past, and we expect that these errors will be found from time to
time in new or enhanced products after commencement of commercial shipments.
These problems may materially adversely affect our business by causing us to
incur significant warranty and repair costs, diverting the attention of our
engineering personnel from our product development efforts and causing
significant customer relations problems.
Problems arising from the use of our products together with other vendors'
products could disrupt our business and harm our financial condition.
Our products must successfully interoperate with products from other vendors. As
a result, when problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the
source of the problem. The occurrence of hardware and software errors, whether
caused by our products or another vendor's products, could result in the delay
or loss of market acceptance of our products, and any necessary revisions may
require us to incur significant expenses. The occurrence of any such problems
would likely have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results
and financial condition.
We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims that are costly
to defend and may adversely affect our business and ability to compete.
Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and
frequent claims and related litigation regarding patent and other intellectual
property rights. In particular, many leading network companies have extensive
patent portfolios with respect to networking technology, while we do not own any
patents nor do we have any patent applications pending that relate to our
NuWaveArchitecture products. We may not have taken actions that adequately
protect our intellectual property rights. From time to time, third parties,
including leading companies, have asserted against others and may assert against
us exclusive patent, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property rights
to technologies and related standards that are important to us. Third parties
may assert claims or initiate litigation against us or our manufacturers,
suppliers or customers alleging infringement of their proprietary rights with
respect to our existing or future products. Any of these claims, with or without
merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation and diversion of
technical and management personnel, or require us to develop non-infringing
technology or enter into royalty or license agreements. These royalty or license
agreements, if required, may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If
there is a successful claim of infringement or if we fail to develop non-
infringing technology or license the proprietary rights on a timely basis, our
business could be harmed.
If we fail to protect our intellectual property, or if others use our
proprietary technology without authorization, our competitive position may
suffer.
Our success and ability to compete are substantially dependent upon our
internally developed technology and know-how. We rely on a combination of
copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to
protect our intellectual property rights. We also enter into confidentiality or
license agreements with our employees, consultants and corporate partners, and
control access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other
proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights,
unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our
products or technology.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our cash equivalents and short-term investments ("investments") are exposed to
financial market risk due to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign exchange
rates, which may affect the interest income and the fair values of our
investments. We manage the exposure to financial market risk by performing
ongoing evaluation of our investment portfolio and investing in short-term
investment grade corporate securities, which mature within the next 12 months.
In addition, we do not use investments for trading or other speculative
purposes. The effect of fluctuations in foreign exchange rates is immaterial as
the majority of the investments held by foreign subsidiaries are denominated in
US dollars. For the year ended December 31, 1999, the average rate of return on
the investments was approximately 5.1%. A hypothetical 10% fluctuation in
interest rates would change interest income by approximately $50,000. Due to
their short maturities, the carrying values of investments approximate their
fair values, and the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on the fair values
of investments is deemed immaterial.
23
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial Statements: Page
Report of Independent Accountants.................................... 25
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1999 and 1998............ 26
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997.................................. 27
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997.................................. 28
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997.................................. 29
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements........................... 30
Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Years Ended
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997.................................. 44
Schedules other than those listed above have been omitted since either they are
not required or the information is included in the financial statements included
herewith.
24
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Network Peripherals Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying
index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Network Peripherals Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 1999 and 1998, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index presents fairly,
in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company's management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States which require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed
above.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
January 17, 2000
25
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
December 31,
1999 1998
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,730 $ 5,537
Short-term investments 4,985 17,814
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts and returns;
1999, $364, and 1998, $523 428 3,430
Receivable from sale of assets 720 -
Inventories 3,830 3,124
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 815 742
--------------------------------------
Total current assets 15,508 30,647
Property and equipment, net 4,984 4,560
Other assets 360 342
--------------------------------------
$ 20,852 $ 35,549
======================================
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 1,534 $ 2,450
Accrued liabilities 1,409 2,127
--------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 2,943 4,577
--------------------------------------
Commitments (Note 5)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued or outstanding - -
Common Stock, $0.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized;
12,749,000, and 12,292,000 shares issued and outstanding 13 12
Additional paid-in capital 65,955 64,060
Accumulated deficit (48,059) (33,100)
-------------------------------------
Total stockholders' equity 17,909 30,972
-------------------------------------
$ 20,852 $ 35,549
=====================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
26
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
Years Ended December 31,
1999 1998 1997
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net sales $ 10,231 $ 28,585 $ 34,798
Cost of sales 9,410 17,250 25,341
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gross profit 821 11,335 9,457
----------------------------------------------------------------
Operating expenses:
Research and development 7,803 11,485 9,757
Marketing and selling 6,437 6,010 13,242
General and administrative 3,503 3,234 3,982
Gain on sale of assets (1,055) - -
Acquired research and development in process - - 6,462
Restructuring expense - - 3,662
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating expenses 16,688 20,729 37,105
----------------------------------------------------------------
Loss from operations (15,867) (9,394) (27,648)
Interest income 908 1,505 1,680
----------------------------------------------------------------
Loss before income taxes (14,959) (7,889) (25,968)
Income tax benefit - - 3,526
----------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss $ (14,959) $ (7,889) $ (22,442)
================================================================
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted $ (1.19) $ (0.64) $ (1.85)
================================================================
Weighted average common shares:
Basic and diluted 12,584 12,281 12,154
================================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
27
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands)
Common Stock Additional Accumulated
Shares Amount Paid-in Capital Deficit Total
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1996 11,954 $ 12 $ 62,614 $ (2,769) $ 59,857
Issuance of Common Stock upon
exercise of stock options 224 - 410 - 410
Issuance of Common Stock under
employee stock purchase plan 74 - 451 - 451
Income tax benefit associated with
nonqualified stock options - - 403 - 403
Net loss - - - (22,442) (22,442)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1997 12,252 12 63,878 (25,211) 38,679
Issuance of Common Stock upon
exercise of stock options 8 - 38 - 38
Issuance of Common Stock under
employee stock purchase plan 32 - 144 - 144
Net loss - - - (7,889) (7,889)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1998 12,292 12 64,060 (33,100) 30,972
Issuance of Common Stock upon
exercise of stock options 457 1 1,895 - 1,896
Net loss - - - (14,959) (14,959)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1999 12,749 $ 13 $ 65,955 $ (48,059) $ 17,909
======================================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
28
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,
1999 1998 1997
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $ (14,959) $ (7,889) $ (22,442)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,826 2,000 3,319
Gain of sale of assets (1,055) - -
Acquired research and development in process - - 6,462
Deferred income taxes - - 2,289
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 3,002 1,740 3,189
Inventories (706) (1,707) 6,811
Income tax refund receivable - 3,983 (3,580)
Prepaid expenses and other assets (131) (146) 1,026
Accounts payable (916) 779 (1,321)
Accrued liabilities (718) (2,956) (2,644)
-----------------------------------------------------
Net cash used in operating activities (13,657) (4,196) (6,891)
-----------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale or maturity of short-term investments 12,829 - 7,979
Purchases of property and equipment (2,559) (2,644) (2,270)
Proceeds from sale of assets, net of expenses 684 - -
Purchases of short-term investments - (3,443) -
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired - - (6,449)
Holdback amount from acquisition - (456) (659)
-----------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 10,954 (6,543) (1,399)
-----------------------------------------------------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock 1,896 182 861
-----------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 1,896 182 861
-----------------------------------------------------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (807) (10,557) (7,429)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 5,537 16,094 23,523
-----------------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 4,730 $ 5,537 $ 16,094
=====================================================
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Non-cash transactions:
Receivable from sale of assets $ 720 $ - $ -
Income tax benefit associated with nonqualified stock options - - 403
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
29
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - THE COMPANY
Network Peripherals Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), designs and
manufactures Layer 2, Layer 3, and Layer 4 functionality Ethernet and Gigabit
Ethernet switching products, which it markets primarily to original equipment
manufacturers, distributors, value-added resellers and system integrators. The
Company's switching products are designed for use in workgroups, wiring closets
and network backbones.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original
maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. The Company's short-term
investments, which consist of debt securities with maturities greater than 90
days and less than one year, have been classified as available-for-sale. For
the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, there were no material unrealized
gains or losses. Substantially all short-term investments are held in the
Company's name by major financial institutions.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from product sales is recognized upon product shipment, provided no
significant obligations remain and collectability is probable. The Company
provides to certain distributors limited rights of return and price protection
on unsold inventory when specific conditions exist. Provisions for estimated
costs of warranty repairs, product returns, and retroactive price adjustments
are recorded at the time products are shipped. Allowances for uncollectible
accounts receivable are provided at the time such receivable is deemed
uncollectible.
Funding under certain development contracts is recognized based upon the
achievement of specified contract milestones. Such funding, which is recognized
as a reduction of the related development costs, totaled approximately $217,000
in 1997. No such funding was recognized in 1999 and 1998.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations
of credit risk, consist principally of cash, cash equivalents, short-term
investments and trade receivables. The Company maintains its cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments with high credit quality financial
institutions and limits its investments to those that are short-term and low
risk. Concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables is
generally limited due to the Company's on-going evaluation of its customers'
credit worthiness and the established long-term relationship with certain
customers.
30
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, using the first-in, first-out
method, or market.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset, typically
three years. Depreciation of the Company's enterprise resource planning
systems, its information systems infrastructure, and certain manufacturing
equipment is based on an estimated useful life of five years.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the
identifiable net assets acquired and is amortized on a straight-line basis over
the expected period of benefit, generally five years. Periodically, the Company
evaluates the goodwill for impairment and estimates the future undiscounted cash
flows of the acquired business to ensure that the carrying value has not been
impaired. As of December 31, 1999 and 1998, goodwill, net of accumulated
amortization, was $93,000 and $133,000, respectively, and was included in other
assets.
Software Development Costs
The Company's software products are integrated into its hardware products and
are typically available for general release to customers within 30 days after
technological feasibility has been achieved. Accordingly, the production costs
incurred after the establishment of technological feasibility and before general
release to customers are immaterial. The Company has not capitalized any
software development costs to date.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method,
which recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected tax
consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and their financial statement reported amounts. The Company records
a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than
not that such assets will not be realized.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency of the Company's subsidiaries in Taiwan and the
Netherlands is the U.S. dollar. Accordingly, gains or losses arising from the
translation of foreign currency financial statements and transactions are
included in determining consolidated results of operations.
Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has stock option plans and offers a 401(k) plan covering all of its
U.S. employees. The 401(k) plan provides for matching contributions determined
at the Company's discretion. In 1999, the Company matched 50% of each
employee's contribution up to $1,000, and the 1999 matching contributions
totaled approximately $59,000. No such matching contributions were made in 1998
and 1997.
31
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based awards to employees using the intrinsic
value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", as permitted under the
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Under APB Opinion No. 25, if the
exercise price of the Company's employee stock options equals the market price
of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is
recognized.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed as net earnings divided by the weighted-
average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings
per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares
issuable through stock-based compensation including stock options, restricted
stock awards, warrants, and other convertible securities using the treasury
stock method. During 1999, 1998 and 1997, the Company incurred net losses, such
that the inclusion of potential common shares would result in an antidilutive
per share amount. Accordingly, no adjustment is made to the basic net loss per
share to arrive at the diluted net loss per share.
Comprehensive Income
There were no reconciling items between net loss and comprehensive loss for the
periods presented.
Recent Accounting Pronouncement
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No.
133, "Accounting for Derivative and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133
establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments,
including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for
hedging activities. In July 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date
of FASB Statement No. 133." SFAS No. 137 deferred the effective date of SFAS
No. 133 until fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. The Company will
adopt SFAS No. 133 during its year ending December 31, 2001. To date, the
Company has not engaged in derivative or hedging activities. The Company is
unable to predict the impact of adopting SFAS No. 133 if it were to engage in
derivative and hedging activity in the future.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years' amounts in order to
conform to the current year's presentation.
32
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
NOTE 3 - BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS (in thousands)
December 31,
1999 1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments:
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and money market accounts $ 2,442 $ 2,508
Corporate debt securities 2,288 3,029
-----------------------------
4,730 5,537
Short-term investments
Corporate debt securities 4,985 17,814
-----------------------------
$ 9,715 $23,351
=============================
Inventories:
Raw materials $ 2,285 $ 882
Work-in-process 401 572
Finished goods 1,144 1,670
-----------------------------
$ 3,830 $ 3,124
=============================
Property and equipment:
Computers and equipment $ 8,106 $ 8,267
Furniture and fixtures 750 920
Leasehold improvements 528 306
-----------------------------
9,384 9,493
Accumulated depreciation (4,400) (4,933)
-----------------------------
$ 4,984 $ 4,560
=============================
Accrued liabilities:
Salaries and benefits $ 592 $ 973
Warranty 375 450
Co-op advertising and market development funds 250 386
Other 192 318
-----------------------------
$ 1,409 $ 2,127
=============================
NOTE 4 - LINE OF CREDIT
The Company currently has a $5 million revolving bank line of credit, which
expires on May 31, 2000. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at
the lower of the bank's prime rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate plus
2.5% and are secured by the Company's receivables, inventory, and other tangible
assets. There were no borrowings under the line of credit in 1999 and 1998. As
of December 31, 1999, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants
required by the line-of-credit agreement.
NOTE 5 - COMMITMENTS
The Company leases its corporate headquarters in Fremont, California, under an
operating lease that expires in October 2004. The Company also has research and
development facilities in Long Island, New York and manufacturing facilities in
Taipei, Taiwan under operating leases expiring in August 2002 and May 2001,
respectively. Rent expense for all of the Company's facilities was $760,000,
$764,000, and $931,000 in 1999, 1998, and 1997, respectively.
33
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Future minimum lease payments under operating leases as of December 31, 1999 are
as follows (in thousands):
Years ended December 31,
2000 $ 821
2001 614
2002 422
2003 335
2004 286
--------
$ 2,478
========
NOTE 6 - CAPITAL STOCK
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Effective May 1998, the Company terminated the Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
which allowed eligible employees to purchase the Company's Common Stock at a
discount through payroll deductions. Prior to the termination of the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, the Company reserved 250,000 shares of Common Stock for
issuance thereunder, and the Company has issued 223,606 shares of Common Stock
for an aggregate purchase price of $1,434,000.
Stock Option Plans
In December 1999, the Company adopted the 1999 Stock Plan (the "1999 Plan"),
which provides for the granting of nonstatutory stock options and restricted
stock awards to eligible employees and consultants. Pursuant to the 1999 Plan,
the Company has reserved 500,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock for
issuance, and the terms and conditions of nonstatutory stock options and
restricted stock awards are determined by the Company's Board of Directors,
provided that the exercise price for a nonstatutory stock option is not less
than 85% of the fair market value of the Company's Common Stock on the date of
the grant. As of December 31, 1999, no nonstatutory stock options or restricted
stock have been granted under the 1999 plan, and all 500,000 shares of Common
Stock reserved for issuance are available for future grant.
The Company's 1997 Stock Plan, as amended, (the "1997 Plan") provides for the
granting of incentive and nonstatutory stock options and restricted stock awards
to eligible employees, directors and consultants. The Company has reserved
2,500,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock for issuance under the 1997 Plan.
Pursuant to the 1997 Plan, the terms and conditions of stock options are
determined by the Company's Board of Directors, provided that (i) the exercise
price for incentive stock options is not less than the fair market value of the
Company's Common Stock on the date of grant and (ii) the exercise price for
nonstatutory stock options is not less than 85% of the fair market value of the
Company's Common Stock on the date of grant. Options under the 1997 Plan vest
over a period determined by the Board of Directors, which is generally four
years. As of December 31, 1999, options to purchase 2,267,499 shares of Common
Stock were outstanding, 144,059 shares were available for future grant, and
2,411,558 shares were authorized but unissued under the 1997 Plan.
Upon adoption of the 1997 Plan in April 1997, the Company terminated the 1993
Stock Option Plan (the "1993 Plan") and the 1996 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan
(the "1996 Plan"). No further stock options were granted under the 1993 Plan
or the 1996 Plan. Outstanding options and shares issued upon the exercise of
options granted continue to be governed by the terms and conditions of the
respective plans. As of December 31, 1999, options to purchase a total of
482,859 shares of Common Stock were outstanding under the 1993 Plan and the 1996
Plan.
34
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The 1994 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "1994 Plan"),
which provides for the automatic granting of nonqualified stock options to
directors of the Company ("Outside Director"), has a total of 150,000 shares
reserved for issuance. Pursuant to the 1994 Plan, the Company grants to each
new Outside Director an option to purchase 15,000 shares of Common Stock at the
time of their appointment and to each Outside Director an additional option to
purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock on the date of each annual meeting of
stockholders. The exercise price of the stock options will be the fair market
value of the Common Stock on the date of grant, and options vest over a period
of four years. At December 31, 1999, options to purchase 50,000 shares of
Common Stock were outstanding, 90,000 shares were available for future grant,
and 140,000 shares of Common Stock were authorized but unissued under the 1994
Plan.
Stock options generally expire 10 years from the date they are granted.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for all of the Company's
stock option plans (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Options Weighted Average
Outstanding Exercise Price
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1996 2,830 $13.52
Granted 1,593 7.31
Exercised (224) 1.89
Canceled (1,602) 11.83
------------
Balance at December 31, 1997 (312 shares exercisable at a
weighted average price of $5.31 per share) 2,597 5.41
Granted 1,298 4.11
Exercised (9) 4.23
Canceled (1,087) 6.17
------------
Balance at December 31, 1998 (913 shares exercisable at a
weighted average price of $4.71 per share) 2,799 4.52
Granted 688 15.62
Exercised (457) 4.14
Canceled (230) 6.70
------------
Balance at December 31, 1999 (1,177 shares exercisable at a
weighted average price of $4.72 per share) 2,800 $ 7.13
============
The Company has elected to continue to follow APB Opinion No. 25 to account for
its employee stock options and adopted the disclosure-only requirements of SFAS
No. 123. SFAS No. 123 requires the disclosure of pro forma net income and
earnings per share as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock
options under the fair value method in accordance with SFAS No. 123. The fair
value of these options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: expected
volatilities of 93% in 1999, 82% in 1998, and 77% in 1997; risk-free interest
rates of 6.2% in 1999, 4.6% in 1998, and 5.4% in 1997; expected lives of 3.5
years in 1999 and 2.5 years in 1998 and 1997; and no dividend yield for all
periods.
Had compensation cost for the Company's employee stock-based plans been
determined based on the fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with
the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company's net loss and net loss per share
would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Years ended December 31,
1999 1998 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net loss - as reported $ (14,959) $ (7,889) $(22,442)
Net loss - pro forma (18,523) (11,368) (28,003)
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted- as reported (1.19) (0.64) (1.85)
Basic and diluted- pro forma (1.47) (0.93) (2.30)
35
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The weighted average estimated grant date fair values, as defined by SFAS No.
123, for options granted under the stock option plans during 1999, 1998 and 1997
were $10.25, $1.98, and $3.29, respectively
Due to the broad decline in the market price of the Company's Common Stock
during 1997, a substantial amount of stock options granted had exercise prices
above the current market price. On July 25, 1997 and subsequently October 31,
1997, the Company offered stock option plan participants the right to replace
any remaining unexercised stock options with an equal number of options at an
exercise price equal to the closing market price on such dates.
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at
December 31, 1999 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Outstanding Exercisable
------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------
Weighted Average Weighted Weighted
Range of Remaining Contractual Average Average
Exercise Prices Shares Life (in years) Exercise Price Shares Exercise Price
------------------ ------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------
$ 0.30 - $ 3.00 358 8.7 $ 2.64 143 $ 2.59
3.88 - 4.94 1,777 7.7 4.59 963 4.68
5.00 - 9.13 131 7.8 6.73 44 6.82
11.63 - 15.00 245 9.1 14.36 27 13.80
16.13 - 20.00 168 9.5 17.09 - -
21.50 - 25.00 67 9.8 24.43 - -
33.63 - 37.38 54 9.9 35.40 - -
------ ------
2,800 8.2 7.13 1,177 4.72
====== ======
NOTE 7 - INCOME TAXES
The following is a geographical breakdown of consolidated loss before income
taxes (in thousands):
Years ended December 31,
1999 1998 1997
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Domestic $(13,898) $(7,302) $(21,761)
Foreign (1,061) (587) (4,207)
----------------------------------------------
$(14,959) $(7,889) $(25,968)
==============================================
Income tax benefit consists of the following (in thousands):
Years ended December 31,
1999 1998 1997
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current:
Federal $ - $ - $ 5,815
State - - -
Foreign - - -
------------------------------------------
- - 5,815
------------------------------------------
Deferred:
Federal - - (1,993)
State - - (296)
------------------------------------------
- - (2,289)
------------------------------------------
$ - $ - $ 3,526
==========================================
36
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount of income tax determined
by applying the applicable U.S. statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss as
follows:
Years ended December 31,
1999 1998 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal statutory rate (35.0%) (35.0%) (35.0%)
State tax, net of federal impact - - (6.0)
Provision for valuation allowance on deferred tax assets 35.0 35.0 22.1
Nondeductible acquisition costs - - 8.6
Other - - (3.3)
------------------------------------------
- - (13.6%)
==========================================
Deferred tax assets consist of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
1999 1998
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards $ 11,635 $ 3,920
Reserves and accruals not currently deductible 987 1,104
Inventory 585 1,437
Other 618 275
--------------------------
Gross deferred tax assets 13,825 6,736
Valuation allowance (13,825) (6,736)
--------------------------
Net deferred tax assets $ - $ -
==========================
Management believes that, based on a number of factors, it is more likely than
not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized, such that a full
valuation allowance has been recorded.
As of December 31, 1999, the Company has federal net operating loss
carryforwards of approximately $25 million, which will expire beginning in 2013.
For state tax purposes, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $11.5 million, which will expire beginning in 2002.
NOTE 8 - SALE OF ASSETS
In June 1999, the Company sold its research and development facilities located
in Hsin Chu, Taiwan, for a total of $1,620,000, of which $900,000 was received
in 1999, and the remaining balance of $720,000 is to be received in July 2000.
In connection therewith, the Company recorded a gain of $1,055,000, net of
payments of broker fees and severance of $216,000.
NOTE 9 - ACQUISITION
Effective April 29, 1997, the Company acquired NetVision Corporation
("NetVision"), a privately held company engaged in the development of very high
bandwidth LAN switching and Gigabit Ethernet technologies, at a cost of $6.5
million, including payments to NetVision stockholders, the assumption of certain
liabilities, and transaction expenses. This transaction was accounted for using
the purchase method, and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired
liabilities assumed and research and development in process based on the
estimated fair market values at the date of acquisition. The research and
development in process represented the estimated current fair value of specified
technologies which had not reached technological feasibility and had no
alternative uses. The results of the operations acquired were included with
those of the Company from the date of acquisition.
37
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The allocation of the purchase price was as follows (in thousands):
Research and development, in process $ 6,462
Goodwill 200
Assets 44
Liabilities assumed (257)
--------
Total $ 6,449
========
The pro forma combined results of operations of the Company and NetVision for
the year ended December 31, 1997, as if the acquisition had occurred at the
beginning of the year, after giving effect to certain pro forma adjustments, are
as follows (in thousands, except per share amount):
Net sales $ 34,798
========
Net loss $(15,254)
========
Net loss per share - basic and diluted $ (1.26)
========
The foregoing pro forma results of operations excluded the write-off of acquired
research and development in process resulting from the acquisition.
NOTE 10 - RESTRUCTURING
In the third quarter of 1997, the Company announced and began to implement a
restructuring plan aimed at reducing costs and restoring profitability to the
Company's operations. The restructuring plan was necessitated by decreased
demand for the Company's products and the Company's adoption of a new strategic
direction. These actions resulted in a net charge of approximately $3.7 million
to the consolidated statement of operations in 1997. The restructuring actions
principally consisted of termination of approximately 70 sales, marketing,
finance and manufacturing employees, closure of certain sales and manufacturing
facilities, cancellation of the related leases, and write-off of excess
manufacturing equipment and goodwill. The Company completed the restructuring in
the second quarter of 1998, and the Company utilized all remaining restructuring
reserves during 1998.
NOTE 11 - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company operates in one business segment, which is the design, development,
production, marketing and support of high performance networking solutions.
Geographic information relating to the Company's net sales and long-lived assets
is reported in the tables below.
Net sales based on customers' locations are as follows (in thousands):
Years ended December 31,
1999 1998 1997
-------------------------------------------------------------
North America $ 5,732 $ 19,695 $ 25,778
Europe 1,452 2,990 3,782
Asia 3,047 5,900 5,238
---------------------------------------
$ 10,231 $ 28,585 $ 34,798
=======================================
Sales to Taiwan-based customers accounted for 17% of the Company's net sales in
1999 and 1998. No one foreign country accounted for more than 10% of the
Company's net sales in 1997.
38
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Long-lived assets, which primarily consisted of fixed assets, are reported below
based on the location of an asset (in thousands):
December 31,
1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------
North America $ 3,593 $ 2,779
Europe 23 39
Asia 1,728 2,084
----------------------
$ 5,344 $ 4,902
======================
NOTE 12 - CONCENTRATIONS
The Company's proprietary ASICs (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits) are
currently manufactured by a single foundry. In the event that this foundry fails
to deliver the expected volumes or meet the required quality standard of ASICs,
the Company may experience delay in production of its NuWave products and loss
of revenues, which could adversely impact the Company's operating results.
The Company has a manufacturing facility located in Taipei, Taiwan, which
manufactures the Company's legacy and NuWave products. In January 2000, the
Company entered into a strategic partnership with a major turnkey manufacturer.
Management believes having dual manufacturing resources will alleviate risks
associated with a single source manufacturer.
The following table summarizes the percentage of net sales accounted for by the
Company's significant customers with sales of 10% or more:
Years ended December 31,
1999 1998 1997
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer A 36% 35% 39%
Customer B - 11% -
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There is no reportable information under this item.
39
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required by this item regarding directors is included under
"Election of Directors" in our Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the compensation
of our Chief Executive officer, and the four other most highly compensated
executive officers whose salary and bonus for the year ended December 31, 1999
exceeded $100,000.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Annual Compensation LongTerm
------------------- Compensation Awards
Name and Securities Underlying
Principal Position Year Salary Bonus(1) Options (1)
------------------- ---- -------- -------- -----------
William F. Rosenberger 1999 $250,000 $ 75,000 0
President and CEO 1998 $125,000 $ 50,000 (2) 500,000
James Sullivan 1999 $246,086 (3) - 15,000
VP of Sales 1998 $253,574 (3) - 60,000
1997 $ 80,567 (3) - 100,000 (4)
Jerry McDowell 1999 $180,000 - -
VP of Marketing 1998 $ 27,346 150,000
Robert Zecha 1999 $152,884 $ 62,500 10,000
VP of Research & 1998 $167,875 - 20,000
Development
Wilson Cheung 1999 $131,669 $ 13,200 95,000 (5)
VP of Finance and CFO 1998 $ 93,433 $ 23,925 (6) 10,000
(1) From time to time, the Compensation Committee reviews the performance
of the executive officers and may award cash bonuses and/or stock
options to officers.
(2) Bonus paid to Mr. Rosenberger in 1998 was pursuant to "sign-on"
provisions in the employment contract.
(3) Included in salary are commissions of $96,086, $103,574 and $15,664 in
1999, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
(4) Option to purchase 50,000 shares was issued on October 31, 1997,
replacing option to purchase 50,000 shares granted on July 7, 1997.
(5) Option to purchase 65,000 shares in 1999 was based on Mr. Cheung's
appointment to executive office.
(6) Bonus paid to Mr. Cheung in 1998 was based on performance prior to him
being appointed to executive office.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this item is included under "Share Ownership by
Principal Stockholders and Management" and "Election of Directors" in our Proxy
Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this item is included under "Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation Decisions" in our Proxy Statement for the
2000 Annual Meeting.
40
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
The information required by subsections (a)1 and (a)2 of this item are included
in the response to Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a) Exhibits
--------
3.1(1) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
3.2(1) By-Laws.
4.1(1) Fourth Amended and Restated Investor Rights Agreement dated
July 15, 1993.
10.1(1) Form of Indemnity Agreement for directors and officers.
10.2(1) Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan and forms of
agreement thereunder.
10.4(1) 1994 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan and form of
agreement thereunder.
10.9(1) Facilities Lease dated August 8, 1991 with John Arrillaga,
Trustee, or his Trustee, or his Successor Trustee UTA dated
7/20/77, as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or his
Successor Trustee UTA dated 7/20/77, as amended.
10.12(1)(2) OEM Purchase Agreement with Network General Corporation
dated March 4, 1991.
10.14(3) Amendment No. 1, dated June 1, 1994, to Facilities Lease
with John Arrillaga, Trustee, or his Successor Trustee UTA
dated 7/20/77, as amended, and Richard T. Peery, Trustee, or
his Successor Trustee UTA dated 7/20/77, as amended.
10.18(4) Purchase Agreement among Network Peripherals Inc., Network
Peripherals, Ltd., NuCom Systems, Inc., and the shareholders
of NuCom, dated January 31, 1996.
10.22 (5) Line of Credit Agreement with Sumitomo Bank dated October 2,
1996.
10.23 (5) Agreement with Glenn Penisten dated May 15, 1996.
10.26 (7) Purchase Agreement among Network Peripherals Inc., NetVision
Corporation, and the shareholders of NetVision , dated April
29, 1997.
10.28 (6) Amended 1994 Outside Directors Option Plan.
10.29 (8)(10) Development and Purchase Agreement with Sun Microsystems,
Inc., dated February 25, 1994.
10.30 (8)(10) Corporate Supply Agreement with Sun Microsystems, Inc.,
dated March 31, 1997.
10.31 (9) Modification Agreement, dated August 29, 1997, to amend
certain terms of the Line of Credit Agreement with Sumitomo
Bank of California.
10.32 (9) Second Modification Agreement, dated November 17, 1997, to
amend certain terms of the Line of Credit Agreement with
Sumitomo Bank of California.
10.33 (9) Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement with
Pauline Lo Alker dated October 31, 1997.
10.35 (9) Salary Continuation Agreement with Glenn Penisten dated
October 31, 1997.
10.37 (9) Salary Continuation Agreement with James Sullivan dated
October 31, 1997.
10.39 (10) Amended 1997 Stock Plan.
10.40 (10) Third Modification Agreement, dated August 18, 1998, to
amend certain terms of the Line of Credit Agreement with
Sumitomo Bank of California.
10.41 (10) Employment Agreement with William Rosenberger dated June 11,
1998, and subsequent amendment dated October 19, 1998.
10.42 (10) Salary Continuation Agreement with Jerry McDowell dated
October 19, 1998.
10.43 (10) Salary Continuation Agreement with Wilson Cheung dated
January 13, 1999.
10.44 (10) Salary Continuation Agreement with Robert Zecha dated
January 13, 1999.
10.45 (11) Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets dated June 14,
1999.
10.46 (12) Lease Agreement dated August 31, 1999.
10.47 Salary Continuation Agreement with Joseph Botta dated June
21, 1999.
10.48 Agreements with California Bank & Trust (formerly Sumitomo
Bank of California), dated July 30, 1999 and October 29,
1999, to amend certain terms of the Line of Credit
Agreement.
10.49 1999 Stock Plan.
21 (10) Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.3 Consent of Independent Accountants.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
41
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
-------------------
None
(1) Incorporated by reference to the corresponding Exhibit previously
filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 33-78350).
(2) Confidential treatment has been granted as to part of this Exhibit.
(3) Incorporated by reference to the corresponding Exhibit previously
filed as an Exhibit to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1994 (File No. 0-23970).
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K
filed on March 31, 1996 (File No. 0-23970).
(5) Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit in the
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1996 (File No. 0-23970).
(6) Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit in the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 1997 (File No. 0-23970).
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's report on Form 8-K
filed on May 14, 1997 (File No. 0-23970).
(8) The Registrant has filed portions of these agreements separately
with the Commission and has requested that those portions be
afforded confidential treatment.
(9) Filed with the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997
(10) Filed with the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998
(11) Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit in the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 1999.
(12) Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit in the
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 1999.
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on January 27, 2000.
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
By: \s\ WILSON CHEUNG
-----------------------------
Wilson Cheung
Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Authorized Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on January 27, 2000.
Signature Title
/s/ William Rosenberger
_________________________ President, Chief Executive Officer and
William Rosenberger Director (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Wilson Cheung
_________________________ Vice President of Finance and
Wilson Cheung Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
/s/ Glenn Penisten
__________________________ Chairman of the Board
Glenn Penisten
/s/ Charles Hart
_________________________ Director
Charles Hart
/s/ Michael Gardner
__________________________ Director
Michael Gardner
/s/ Steve Bell
_________________________ Director
Steve Bell
43
NETWORK PERIPHERALS INC.
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(in thousands)
SCHEDULE II
Additions
-----------------------------
Balance at Charged to Charged to Balance at
Beginning Costs and Other End
of Year Expenses Accounts Deductions of Year
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year ended December 31, 1997
Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 209 $ 400 $ - $ (311) $ 298
Allowance for sales returns and other credits 945 2,841 - (2,900) 886
------------------------------------------------------------------
Total allowances for doubtful accounts and
sales returns 1,154 3,241 - (3,211) 1,184
Year ended December 31, 1998
Allowance for doubtful accounts 298 - - (215) 83
Allowance for sales returns and other credits 886 82 - (528) 440
------------------------------------------------------------------
Total allowances for doubtful accounts and
sales returns 1,184 82 - (743) 523
Year ended December 31, 1999
Allowance for doubtful accounts 83 47 - (71) 59
Allowance for sales returns and other credits 440 - - (135) 305
------------------------------------------------------------------
Total allowances for doubtful accounts and
sales returns $ 523 $ 47 $ - $ (206) $ 364
==================================================================
44