Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|X| ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2000
COMMISSION FILE NO. 333-45862
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MASSACHUSETTS 04-1414660
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
John Hancock Place
Post Office Box 0111
Boston, Massachusetts 0111
(617) 572-6000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered
NONE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
NONE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |_| No |X|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K |_|. Not Applicable.
The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions I(1)(a)
and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this Form 10-K with reduced
disclosure format.
At February 28, 2001 there were outstanding 1,000 shares of the registrant's
common stock, $10,000 par value per share of the registrant, all of which are
owned by John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.
1
Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS..................................................3
PART I.........................................................................4
ITEM 1. BUSINESS OF JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.....................4
ITEM 1A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT..............................35
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.........................................................36
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS..................................................36
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS................37
PART II.......................................................................37
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS......................37
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA ...........................................37
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF SEGMENTOPERATIONS.........................37
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT MARKET RISK........75
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA........................78
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE................................78
PART III......................................................................78
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY..........................................................
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION............................................78
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT.......................................................78
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS....................78
PART IV.......................................................................78
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K.........................................................78
We qualify under the conditions set forth in General Instructions I(1)(a) and
(b) of Form 10-K and are therefore filing this Form 10-K with reduced disclosure
format. Accordingly, Items 4, 10, 11, 12 and 13 are not included in this Form
10-K.
2
Forward-Looking Statements
The statements, analyses, and other information contained herein relating
to trends in the Company's operations and financial results, the markets for the
Company's products, the future development of the Company's business, and the
contingencies and uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as
other statements including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan,"
"estimate," "expect," "intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar
expressions, are "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's
current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and their effects on
the Company and may not be those anticipated by management. John Hancock's
actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these
forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties
including, but not limited to, the risks that (1) a significant downgrade in our
ratings for claims-paying ability and financial strength may lead to policy and
contract withdrawals and materially harm our ability to market our products, (2)
elimination of Federal tax benefits for our products and other changes in laws
and regulations (including in particular the possible amendment or repeal of the
Federal Estate Tax) which the Company expects would adversely affect sales of
our insurance and investment advisory products, (3) Massachusetts insurance law
may restrict the ability of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company to pay
dividends to us, (4) we face increasing competition in our retail and
institutional businesses from mutual fund companies, banks and investment
management firms as well as from other insurance companies, (5) a decline or
increased volatility in the securities markets, and other economic factors, may
adversely affect our business, particularly our variable life insurance, mutual
fund, variable annuity and investment business, (6) our life insurance sales are
highly dependent on a third party distribution relationship, (7) interest rate
volatility may adversely affect our profitability, (8) our net income and
revenues will suffer if customers surrender annuities and variable and universal
life insurance policies or redeem shares of our open-end mutual funds, (9) the
independent directors of our variable series trusts and of our mutual funds
could reduce the compensation paid to us or could terminate our contracts to
manage the funds, (10) under our Plan of Reorganization, we were required to
establish the "closed block" a special arrangement for the benefit of a group of
our policyholders and we may have to fund deficiencies in our closed block, and
any overfunding of the closed block will benefit only the holders of policies
included in the closed block, not any affiliate, or our stockholder, (11) we
will face losses if the claims on our insurance products, or reductions in rates
of mortality on our annuity products, are greater than we projected, (12) we
face risks relating to our investment portfolio, (13) we may experience
volatility in net income due to changes in standards for accounting for
derivatives, (14) we are subject to risk-based capital requirements and possible
guaranty fund assessments, (15) the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners' codification of statutory accounting practices will adversely
affect our statutory surplus, (16) we may be unable to retain personnel who are
key to our business, (17) we face risks from assumed reinsurance business in
respect of personal accident insurance and the occupational accident component
of workers compensation insurance, (18) litigation and regulatory proceedings
may result in financial losses, harm our reputation and divert management
resources, and (19) we face unforeseen liabilities arising from our acquisitions
and dispositions of businesses.
Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed, as
well as to further discussion of the risks described above, in other documents
that may be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission from time to time. The Company specifically disclaims any obligation
to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future developments, or otherwise.
3
PART I
ITEM 1. Business of John Hancock Life Insurance Company
The Board of Directors of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company
unanimously adopted a Plan of Reorganization effective February 1, 2000 and John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company converted from a mutual life insurance
company to a stock life insurance company, John Hancock Life Insurance Company,
or John Hancock, and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. Also on February 1, 2000, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.
completed an initial public offering of 102,000,000 shares of its common stock,
par value $0.01 per share.
Founded in 1862, John Hancock today is one of the nation's leading
financial services companies, providing a broad array of insurance and
investment products and services to retail and institutional customers,
primarily in North America.
We operate our business in five segments. Two segments primarily serve
retail customers, and two segments serve institutional customers. Our fifth
segment is the Corporate and Other Segment.
Our retail segments are the Protection Segment and the Asset Gathering
Segment. The Protection Segment offers variable life, universal life, whole
life, term life, and individual and group long-term care insurance products. The
Asset Gathering Segment offers variable and fixed, deferred and immediate
annuities, and mutual funds. Our retail business also includes our retail
distribution and customer service operations.
According to the latest publicly available data, with respect to the United
States, the Company is the twelfth largest writer of individual life insurance
based on new and recurring individual life sales and the eighth largest writer
of individual variable universal life insurance. We believe we are the fourth
largest writer of individual long-term care insurance and the top provider of
group long-term care insurance based on total premiums in force. As of September
30, 2000, we were the 26th largest writer of individual annuity contracts, based
on LIMRA sales data. Our mutual fund subsidiary ranked 29th among U.S. asset
managers in terms of total long-term, open-end assets under management as of
December 31, 2000.
Our institutional segments are the Guaranteed and Structured Financial
Products Segment and the Investment Management Segment. The Guaranteed and
Structured Financial Products Segment offers a wide variety of spread-based and
fee-based investment products and services, most provide the customer with some
form of guaranteed return. The Investment Management Segment consists of
investment management services and products marketed to institutions. This
business is primarily fee-based and investment management products generally do
not offer guarantees.
As of December 31, 2000, our total assets under management was $125.2
billion, which includes $31.7 billion of assets invested in the Company's retail
mutual funds and total shareholder's equity, excluding net unrealized capital
gains on securities, was $5.3 billion as of December 31, 2000. In addition, John
Hancock generated $7.1 billion in revenues and $840.1 million in net income in
2000.
4
Protection Segment
Overview
Through our Protection Segment, we offer a variety of non-traditional and
traditional life insurance products and individual and group long-term care
insurance products. Our non-traditional life insurance products include variable
life and universal life insurance. Our traditional life insurance products
include whole life insurance and term life insurance.
The Protection Segment has traditionally been our largest business segment,
contributing 34.2.%, 37.6% and 40.0% of consolidated operating revenues and
33.9%, 30.9% and 33.6% of consolidated segment after-tax operating income in the
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Protection
Segment generated revenues of $2,873.2, $2,756.9 and $2,667.6 million and
after-tax operating income of $252.2, $188.7 and $166.1 million in 2000, 1999,
and 1998 respectively. The Protection Segment has achieved the following
financial results for the periods indicated:
As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Sales (new premiums and deposits):
Non-traditional life--excluding COLI and BOLI (1)
Variable life ............................... $ 152.5 $ 130.6 $ 103.9
Universal life .............................. 18.4 16.4 20.3
Traditional life--excluding COLI (1)
Whole life .................................. 8.4 18.9 18.8
Term life ................................... 36.3 24.0 22.9
COLI and BOLI
Variable life--COLI ......................... 38.6 23.6 53.5
Universal life--COLI ........................ 14.8 3.3 23.5
Whole life--COLI ............................ -- -- 1.2
Universal life--BOLI ........................ 0.8 -- 12.4
Individual long-term care (2) .................... 73.9 70.9 56.8
Group long-term care (3) ......................... 6.1 6.3 3.8
--------- --------- ---------
Total .................................. $ 349.8 $ 294.0 $ 317.1
========= ========= =========
Assets:
Non-traditional life ............................. $10,433.5 $10,195.5 $ 8,713.2
Traditional life ................................. 13,861.7 13,716.7 16,412.4
Individual long-term care ........................ 2,227.2 1,002.2 735.3
Group long-term care ............................. 480.6 466.0 400.2
Other ............................................ 46.9 36.5 23.2
Intra-segment eliminations ....................... -- (44.8) (600.1)
--------- --------- ---------
Total .................................. $27,049.9 $25,372.1 $25,684.2
========= ========= =========
(1) Individual life insurance sales exclude (a) excess premiums, which are
premiums that build cash value but do not purchase face amounts of
insurance on variable life and universal life insurance products and (b)
premiums on corporate owned life insurance (COLI) and bank owned life
insurance (BOLI) policies covering more than 200 lives. Sales include 10%
of single premium payments on universal and whole life insurance products.
(2) Individual long-term care sales include only LIMRA sales for all period
presented.
(3) Group long-term care sales include only sales made to new employer groups
initially effective in the year. Re-enrollments on existing accounts, sales
constituting increased coverage to existing insureds, sales to non-employer
groups and sales to new employees added to a group are excluded.
5
Products and Markets
The trend in the individual life industry has shifted towards variable life
insurance products and away from traditional whole life products. This is
reflected in our life insurance sales growth, which has come principally from
sales of variable, universal and term life insurance, while sales of traditional
whole life insurance have declined. By diversifying from traditional whole life
insurance products to term life insurance products and investment-oriented
savings products demanded by today's consumer, we have generated strong business
and earnings growth. The Company's new sales of individual life insurance
(excluding COLI and BOLI) in 2000 were 71% variable life, 9% universal life and
20% was traditional life. Term life sales represented 81% of traditional life
product sales for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Individual Life Insurance. We believe there are two distinct groups of
consumers for our individual life insurance products: relationship-oriented
consumers; those with complex buying needs willing to pay a premium for
professional advisors, and self-directed consumers; those with simpler product
needs who are price sensitive and will initiate their own insurance as needs
arise. We market our variable, universal and whole life insurance products to
relationship-oriented consumers. We market our term life insurance products to
relationship-oriented consumers, as well as to self-directed consumers through
direct distribution in e-commerce.
o Variable Life Insurance. Our primary variable life insurance product
is variable universal life insurance. This product provides life
insurance coverage and an investment return linked to an underlying
portfolio of investments chosen by the policyholder. Our variable life
insurance product portfolio includes joint (second-to-die) and
corporate owned life insurance products, as well as single life
policies. Second-to-die products are typically used for estate
planning purposes and insure two lives rather than one, with the
policy proceeds paid after the death of both insured individuals.
Corporate owned life insurance products are sold to corporations to
fund special deferred compensation plans and benefit programs for key
employees. We were among the first insurance companies to offer
variable life insurance products, beginning in 1980, and we believe
the length of our experience in this market is a competitive strength.
In 2000, we introduced an innovative new product called Unison, which
is a variable life insurance policy with a long-term care rider.
o Universal Life Insurance. Our universal life insurance products
provide life insurance coverage and cash value that increases based on
a credited interest rate which is periodically reset. These policies
generally permit policyholders to use any increase in cash value to
vary the amount of insurance coverage and the timing and amount of
premium payments. Our universal life insurance product portfolio also
includes corporate owned life insurance and bank owned life insurance
products which are sold to banks to fund post-retirement employee
benefit plan liabilities. We participate in the bank owned life
insurance market selectively, as special sales opportunities arise.
o Traditional Life Insurance Products. Our traditional life insurance
products include single life and joint life (second-to-die) whole life
insurance, and term life insurance. Participating whole life insurance
combines a death benefit with a cash value that generally increases
gradually in amount over a period of years, and typically pays a
policy dividend. Term life insurance provides only a death benefit,
does not build up cash value, and does not pay a dividend.
Long-Term Care Insurance. We entered the individual long-term care
insurance (LTC) market in 1987 and the group long-term care insurance market in
1988. Our long-term care insurance products provide protection against the large
and escalating costs of home health care, assisted living, and nursing home
care. With the aging population, the expected inability of government
entitlement programs to meet retirement needs, and a growing public awareness of
long-term care insurance, we believe there is excellent growth potential for the
long-term care insurance market. Our long-term care insurance products are
reimbursement products, which provide benefits only for documented nursing home
or health care expenses. These products are sold on a guaranteed renewable
basis, meaning that we are required to renew the policies each year as long as
the premium is paid. However, this also gives us the ability to reset the price
of the product prospectively, if needed. Our claims history on these products
has been favorable relative to our pricing assumptions.
On March 1, 2000, we completed the acquisition of the individual long-term
care insurance business of Fortis, Inc. This acquisition increased by about 50%
(as measured by total premiums and number of policies in force) the total size
of our individual long-term care insurance business, boosting our market share
to 12% from 8%.
o Individual Long-Term Care Insurance. Our individual long-term care
insurance products are sold to pre-
6
retirement and retired customers. The insured pays the premium for
this product. In 2000, we launched SimpleCare, a streamlined LTC
insurance product with a simplified application and approval process
sold through the bank channel and through Internet partnerships.
o Group Long-Term Care Insurance. Our group long-term care insurance
products are sold through employer-sponsored plans to employees and
retirees, and their eligible relatives. The insured, not the employer,
generally pays the premium for this insurance. Following selection of
one of our plans by an employer, we market our products directly to
the employee base. The principal market for our group long-term care
insurance products is companies with over 7,500 employees and
retirees. We also pursue smaller employers with 500 or more employees
and retirees in selected industries.
The following table demonstartes total statutory premiums and deposits, which is
the premium we report on the annual statements we file with insurance
regulators, life insurance in force and GAAP reserves for our individual life
insurance and long-term care products. In addition to premium from sales of new
policies and long-term care insurance products, which we refer to as "sales,"
statutory premiums and deposits includes revenues from renewals of policies, 10%
of single premium payments, and premiums from reinsurance assumed by us. We
deduct from this measure the premiums that we cede to our reinsurers. Statutory
premiums and deposits differ from GAAP premiums because GAAP requires that
premiums on variable and universal life insurance products be accounted for
using deposit accounting. Deposit accounting excludes the premiums received on
these products and generally shows the fees earned from the products as
revenues.
Selected Financial Data
Individual Life and Long-Term Care Insurance
As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
(in millions)
Total statutory premiums and deposits:
Variable life ......................... $ 922.0 $ 829.8 $ 810.8
Universal life (1) .................... 173.5 117.9 436.8
Traditional life ...................... 965.5 1,043.6 1,051.3
Individual long-term care ............. 276.7 195.3 171.3
Group long-term care .................. 14.7 18.9 31.0
---------- ---------- ----------
Total ............................ $ 2,352.4 $ 2,205.5 $ 2,501.2
========== ========== ==========
Life insurance in force:
Variable life ......................... $ 57,716.2 $ 56,691.1 $ 52,552.9
Universal life ........................ 9,085.6 8,967.2 8,511.0
Traditional life ...................... 66,989.3 57,284.8 52,122.6
---------- ---------- ----------
Total ............................ $133,791.1 $122,943.1 $113,186.5
========== ========== ==========
GAAP Reserves:
Variable life ......................... $ 6,517.1 $ 6,560.0 $ 5,407.5
Universal life ........................ 2,268.7 2,065.7 1,930.3
Traditional life ...................... 10,030.6 9,786.3 9,386.0
Individual long-term care ............. 1,317.3 658.0 473.4
Group long-term care .................. 403.4 334.3 275.2
---------- ---------- ----------
Total ............................ $ 20,537.1 $ 19,404.3 $ 17,472.4
========== ========== ==========
(1) Includes bank owned life insurance premiums of $52.5 million and $340.0
million for the years ended December 31, 2000, and 1998. There were no bank
owned life insurance premiums for the year ended December 31, 1999.
7
Distribution
Protection products are distributed through multiple distribution channels,
including our career agency system, which we integrated into our distribution
subsidiary, Signator Financial Network ("Signator"), M Financial Group,
independent broker/dealers, a private label arrangement, banks and directly to
consumers, via the Internet and over the phone. Typically we employ separate
sales efforts for each product. However, we also attempt to optimize our
distributor relationships by selling complementary products where the needs of
the consumer call for them. The Protection Segment's distribution channels
include the following:
Signator. Signator, created in 1999, is a separate distribution subsidiary.
Signator provides highly tailored financial planning tools and market support
and enables our agents to sell products of competing insurance companies. This
subsidiary is structured to enable us to recruit, develop and retain top
producers. Within Signator we include both our Signator General Agency (GA) and
Signator Brokerage channels. Signator Brokerage includes GA Brokerage and Direct
Brokerage. We have seen growth in sales from the brokerage channel as more
agencies are developing dedicated brokerage structures as part of their overall
business model and our expansion into the direct brokerage channel. The Signator
General Agency system includes approximately 2,400 sales personnel. We believe
that over time Signator will enable us to continue growing revenues, while
reducing unit expenses.
M Financial Group. M Financial Group is a national producer group founded
in 1978 comprised of approximately 105 life insurance producing firms with
approximately 425 individual producers operating exclusively in the upper end of
the wealth transfer and executive benefit markets. We believe John Hancock has
been either the first or second largest provider of life insurance products to
the M Financial Group in each of the past three years, although the member firms
also sell the products of other prominent U.S. life insurance companies. For the
year 2000 we believe we were the largest provider.
We have jointly developed a proprietary life insurance product line with M
Financial Group to meet the distinct requirements of its producers. We also
offer four proprietary investment options of M Fund, Inc. on all variable life
insurance products sold by M Financial Group members, in addition to the
investment options supported by the variable series trust (VST). Near the end of
2000 we were the first provider to roll out Magnastar, M Group's proprietary
private placement life insurance product, co-manufactured by M Life and John
Hancock.
In addition to these proprietary products, we provide a number of exclusive
services to M Financial Group members, including a deferred compensation plan,
dedicated sales, underwriting and services teams and participation in special
marketing events, as well as M Financial Group sponsored systems and technology
initiatives. In addition, M Life Insurance Company shares the insurance risk,
through reinsurance, on 50% of most of our policies that its members sell. These
products and services and this reinsurance arrangement serve to align M
Financial Group producers' incentives with ours.
During 2000, John Hancock was the only provider to extend debt financing
for M Financial Holdings, Inc.'s purchase of one of its own COLI firms, to
assist it in the first step of its long-term aggregation process.
The business generated by M Financial Group producers has experienced lower
termination or non-renewal (referred to in the industry as "lapse") and
mortality rates than the industry average.
Independent Broker/Dealers. We have selling agreements for individual
long-term care insurance products with over 45 independent broker/dealer
organizations. In addition, our sales through Signator include some life
insurance sold by broker/dealers. In 2001, we will be rolling out our Express
Ticket process which is an innovative approach to selling long-term care
insurance in the broker/dealer community. With Express Ticket the broker
completes a simple "one page" order form with the client, John Hancock then
handles all follow-on processing. This process frees up the broker's time and
removes them from the position of obtaining in-depth personal, financial and
medical information from the client.
Direct distribution. We have developed a direct distribution unit,
operating under the "MarketPlace by John Hancock" brand, to complement our
traditional sales efforts. Through this unit, we sell our products over the
telephone, through direct mail and over the Internet directly to consumers.
Consumers can call a toll-free number or go directly to our web site to get
information, obtain a quote or start an application. We have built a call center
and developed a streamlined application,
8
payment and issue process to support this distribution channel.
Our e-commerce initiatives include the John Hancock Internet web site, and
partnerships with several on-line partners and key aggregators. We offer term
life insurance and long-term care products through the e-commerce channel, which
allows consumers to begin an insurance application process directly on-line. We
have announced our intent to introduce e-variable life and e-annuity products
for distribution in the near future.
Banks. We offer a full line of life and individual long-term care insurance
products through banks that have established an insurance sales force. Sales of
insurance products in this channel build on our well developed sales of fixed
and variable annuity and mutual fund product sales in the bank channel.
Group sales force. Group long-term care insurance products are marketed by
a dedicated sales force located in major cities around the country. The sales
force works closely with consultants, brokers, and other intermediaries to
generate sales and grow existing accounts.
Private label arrangements. In 1999, we launched an individual long-term
care product which is being sold through another insurer under a private label
arrangement. We continue to explore private label arrangements with respect to
various other products.
Signator, the M Financial Group, our independent broker/dealer channel and
the bank channel are aimed at relationship-oriented consumers. The direct
distribution channel targets self-directed consumers.
9
The table below shows Protection Segment sales by distribution channel for the
periods indicated. Individual life insurance sales exclude excess premiums,
which are premiums that build cash value but do not purchase any additional face
amount of insurance, on variable life and universal life insurance products and
premiums on corporate owned life insurance and bank owned life insurance
policies covering more than 200 lives. Sales include 10% of single premium
payments on universal life and whole life insurance policies. Group long-term
care sales include only sales made to new employer groups initially effective in
the year. Re-enrollments on existing accounts, sales constituting increased
coverage to existing insureds, and sales to non-employer groups and new
employees added to a group are excluded. COLI is sold only by Signator and M
Financial Group. BOLI is sold only by Signator.
Protection Segment Sales by Distribution Channel
For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
Signator:
Individual life--excluding COLI and BOLI ... $129.0 $122.9 $111.4
Individual life--COLI ...................... 23.7 8.5 9.1
Individual life--BOLI ...................... 0.8 -- 12.4
Individual long-term care .................. 64.9 63.3 50.7
M Financial Group:
Individual life--excluding COLI ............ 59.9 55.8 48.7
Individual life--COLI ...................... 29.7 18.4 69.1
Individual long-term care .................. 0.2 0.1 0.1
Independent Broker/Dealers:
Individual life ............................ 3.7 0.5 --
Individual long-term care .................. 7.3 6.6 5.7
Direct Distribution:
Individual life ............................ 19.5 8.6 4.8
Banks:
Individual life ............................ 3.3 1.7 0.5
Individual long-term care .................. 1.0 0.7 0.2
Dedicated Sales Force:
Group long-term care ....................... 6.1 6.3 3.8
Other:
Individual life ............................ 0.2 0.4 0.5
Individual long-term care .................. 0.5 0.2 0.1
Total:
Individual life--excluding COLI and BOLI ... 215.6 189.9 165.9
Individual life--COLI and BOLI ............. 54.2 26.9 90.6
Individual long-term care (2) .............. 73.9 70.9 56.8
Group long-term care ....................... 6.1 6.3 3.8
(1) Sales originated through either broker/dealers or independent insurance
brokers and reported within the Signator Channel were 55.3%, 45.9% and
40.1% of total Signator individual life insurance sales for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. For long-term care
insurance for each of these three periods 29.5%, 21.0% and 16.6% of total
Signator individual long-term care insurance sales originated through
either broker/dealers or independent insurance brokers reported through the
Signator Channel.
(2) Individual long-term care sales include only LIMRA sales for all period
presented.
Underwriting
Insurance underwriting involves a determination of the type and amount of
risk that an insurer is willing to accept. Underwriting also determines the
amount and type of reinsurance levels appropriate for a particular type of risk.
By utilizing reinsurance, we can limit our risk and improve product pricing.
10
Our underwriting standards for life insurance are intended to result in the
issuance of policies that produce mortality experience consistent with the
assumptions used in product pricing. Our underwriting is based on our historical
mortality experience, as well as the experience of the insurance industry and of
the general population. We continually compare our underwriting standards
against the industry to mitigate our exposure to higher risk business and to
stay abreast of industry trends. For individual long-term care products, we use
separate but similar underwriting criteria appropriate to the morbidity risks
insured. Our overall profitability depends to a large extent on the degree to
which our mortality and/or morbidity experience matches our pricing assumptions.
Our life and long-term care insurance underwriters evaluate policy applications
on the basis of the information provided by the applicant and others. We have
implemented new programs to improve our underwriting process. These include the
Telephone Interview Program, implemented in 1999, which permits eligible
long-term care clients to be interviewed over the telephone by trained nurses,
replacing the collection of a physician's statement in 50% of the cases, leading
to lower costs and faster cycle times, without any loss of required underwriting
information. We have also implemented the STAR (System to Assess Risk)
underwriting system in 2000 to improve the risk assessment process through
automation which has resulted in a reduction of cycle times, improved
productivity and a reduction of total costs. We are hard at work on the next
phase of our underwriting automation projects including on-line conditional
approval and reflexive questioning through our tele-application unit to better
set client expectations regarding underwriting classification. These initiatives
are expected to further reduce our unit costs by eliminating the use of
unnecessary underwriting tools and increasing policy taken rates.
Group long-term care underwriting is conducted on both the employer group
level and the individual level. Our group long-term care corporate customers
generally offer their employees the opportunity to purchase coverage on a
"guaranteed-issue" basis, meaning that all employees are eligible for insurance
coverage, and offer individually underwritten coverage to family members. We
rely on our experience in underwriting large groups in order to set prices that
take into account the underwriting arrangements, the general health conditions
of the corporate customers' employees, the specifics of the negotiated plan
design, and other demographic and morbidity trends. Group products are written
on a guaranteed renewable basis, which permits repricing if necessary.
Our corporate owned and bank owned life insurance policies covering
multiple lives are issued on a guaranteed issue basis, where the amount of
insurance issued per life on a guaranteed basis is related to the total number
of lives being covered and the particular need for which the product is being
purchased. Guaranteed issue underwriting applies to employees actively at work,
and product pricing reflects the additional guaranteed issue underwriting risk.
Reserves
We establish and report liabilities for future policy benefits on our
balance sheet to meet the obligations under our insurance policies and
contracts. Our liability for variable life insurance and universal life
insurance policies and contracts is equal to the cumulative account balances.
Cumulative account balances include deposits plus credited interest less expense
and mortality fees and withdrawals. Future policy benefits for our traditional
life, individual long-term care and group long-term care insurance policies are
calculated based on a set of actuarial assumptions that we establish and
maintain throughout the lives of the policies. Our assumptions include
investment yields, mortality, morbidity and expenses.
Competition
We face significant competition in all our retail protection businesses.
Our competitors include other large and highly rated insurance carriers as well
as certain banks, securities brokerage firms, investment advisors and other
financial intermediaries marketing annuities and mutual funds. Some of these
competitors have greater financial strength and resources and have penetrated
more markets. In particular, national banks may become more significant
competitors in the future for insurers who sell annuities as a result of
recently enacted legislation, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which permits
affiliations among banks, securities firms and insurance companies. For
additional information, see the Regulation section, included elsewhere in this
Form 10-K. In the e-commerce arena, we also face competition from internet
start-up companies and traditional competitors that have established internet
platforms.
11
We believe that we distinguish ourselves from our competitors through the
combination of:
o our strong and reputable brand name;
o our strong financial ratings;
o our broad range of competitive and innovative products and our ability
to create unique product combinations for various distribution
channels;
o the depth of our experience as one of the first companies to offer
variable life insurance, individual long-term care insurance and group
long-term care insurance;
o our brand penetration within each channel of distribution;
o our dedication to customer service.
Competition also exists for agents and other distributors of insurance
products. Much of this competition is based on the pricing of products and the
agent or distributor compensation structure. We believe that our competitive
strengths coupled with the advantages of our Signator network will enable us to
compete successfully to attract and retain top quality agents and distributors.
Reinsurance
We reinsure portions of the risks we assume for our protection products.
The maximum amount of individual ordinary life insurance retained by us on any
life is $10 million under an individual policy and $20 million under a
second-to-die policy. As of January 1, 2001, we have established additional
reinsurance programs, which limit our exposure to fluctuations in life claims
for individuals for whom the net amount at risk is $3 million or more. In
February 2001, the Company announced that it signed letters of intent with two
reinsurers covering 50% of its closed block business. The treaties are
structured so they will not affect policyholder dividends or any other financial
items reported within the closed block, which was established at the time of the
Company's demutualization to protect the reasonable dividend expectations of
certain participating life insurance policyholders.
By entering into reinsurance agreements with a diverse group of highly rated
reinsurers, we seek to control our exposure to losses. Our reinsurance, however,
does not discharge our legal obligations to pay policy claims on the policies
reinsured. As a result, we enter into reinsurance agreements only with highly
rated reinsurers. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that all our
reinsurers will pay the claims we make against them. Failure of a reinsurer to
pay a claim could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Protection
Segment, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
12
Asset Gathering Segment
Overview
Through our Asset Gathering Segment, we offer individual annuities, mutual
fund products and investment management services. Individual annuities include
variable and fixed annuities, both immediate and deferred. Mutual fund products
primarily consist of open-end mutual funds and closed-end funds. Our investment
management services include retirement services, offered principally to 401(k)
plans, and the management of institutional pools of capital. In this segment, we
also include the results of Signator, John Hancock Signature Services, our
servicing subsidiary, First Signature Bank & Trust Company, our limited-service
banking subsidiary, and Essex Corporation, one of the nation's largest
intermediaries between banks and product manufacturers for annuities.
The Asset Gathering Segment contributed 14.2%, 14.4% and 15.2% of
consolidated operating revenues and 17.3%, 18.9% and 22.5% of consolidated
after-tax operating income in the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. The Asset Gathering Segment generated revenues of $1,195.9,
$1,057.3 and $1,015.3 million and after-tax operating income of $128.8, $115.1
and $111.1 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Asset Gathering
Segment has achieved the following financial results for the periods indicated:
As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Sales:
Variable annuities (1) ............... $ 1,145.8 $ 847.7 $ 882.7
Fixed annuities (1) .................. 880.4 648.6 377.8
John Hancock Funds (2) ............... 5,307.0 3,899.6 6,797.7
--------- --------- ---------
Total ........................... $ 7,333.2 $ 5,395.9 $ 8,058.2
========= ========= =========
Assets:
Variable annuities ................... $ 7,425.3 $ 7,877.6 $ 6,820.5
Fixed annuities ...................... 5,988.4 5,693.0 5,140.4
John Hancock Funds ................... 410.5 442.9 502.1
Other ................................ 243.0 283.7 252.7
--------- --------- ---------
Total ........................... $14,067.2 $14,297.2 $12,715.7
========= ========= =========
Assets Under Management:
Variable annuities ................... $ 7,116.0 $ 7,598.1 $ 6,569.6
Fixed annuities ...................... 5,640.8 5,255.0 4,867.4
John Hancock Funds (3) ............... 31,725.8 32,696.6 34,945.2
(1) Represents statutory annual statement values. Statutory revenues include
premiums and deposits on variable and fixed annuities. Statutory premiums
and deposits differ from GAAP premiums because GAAP requires that variable
and certain fixed annuity products be accounted for using deposit
accounting. Deposit accounting excludes from revenue the premiums and
deposits received on these products.
(2) Mutual fund and institutional asset sales are defined as new inflows of
funds from investors into our investment products. Sales of mutual fund
products are recorded on the trade date. Sales of institutional investment
products are recorded on the date a firm commitment is established. Sales
of retail money market products are not included in 1999 or 1998. If this
methodology had been used in prior periods, sales for John Hancock Funds
would have been $3,728.5 million and $6,592.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
13
(3) Includes $2.9 billion, $2.3 billion and $2.6 billion of our general account
assets and assets managed for certain John Hancock subsidiaries and assets
managed for variable annuities as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
Products and Markets
Annuities
We offer variable and fixed annuities, immediate and deferred, to a broad
range of consumers through multiple distribution channels. Annuities may be
deferred, where assets accumulate until the contract is surrendered, the
contractholder dies, or the contractholder begins receiving benefits under an
annuity payout option; or immediate, where payments begin within one year of
issue and continue for a fixed period of time or for life with or without a
period certain.
Variable annuities are separate account products, where the contractholder
bears the investment risk and has the right to allocate their funds among
various separate investment subaccounts. Our major source of revenues from
variable annuities is mortality and expense fees charged to the contractholder,
generally determined as a percentage of the market value of the underlying
assets under management. We introduced a new variable annuity product line, the
Revolution series, in 1999, and became the first in the industry to offer
assistance with the cost of long-term care, with no underwriting. Revolution is
targeted to the needs of aging consumers who want to accumulate funds for
retirement and provide a hedge against the cost of long-term care. Revolution
sales comprise 73% of total variable annuity sales for 2000.
Fixed annuities are general account products, where we bear the investment
risk as funds are invested in our general account and a stated interest rate is
credited to the contractholders' accounts. Our major source of income from fixed
annuities is the spread between the investment income earned on the underlying
general account assets and the interest credited to contractholders' accounts.
Investment management skills are critical to the growth and profitability
of our annuity business. In addition to variable annuity products that offer the
same fund choices as our variable life insurance products, we also offer
variable annuities that offer funds managed by our subsidiaries. Our variable
annuity assets are managed by John Hancock Funds, our mutual fund subsidiary,
and by Independence Investment Associates, Inc., our internal institutional
equity manager. All our fixed annuity assets are managed internally.
The relative proportion of our total annuity sales represented by fixed and
variable annuities is generally driven by the relative performance of the equity
and fixed income markets. John Hancock's total annuity deposits were comprised
of 43% fixed annuity and 57% variable annuity for the years ended December 31,
2000 and 1999.
14
The following table presents certain information regarding our annuity reserve
activity for the periods indicated:
Annuity Reserve Activity
As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Variable Annuities:
Reserves, beginning of year ............................. $ 7,683.2 $ 6,660.4 $ 5,245.0
Deposits and other policy credits (1) .............. 1,162.3 847.7 882.7
Interest credited and investment performance ....... (538.3) 942.1 1,090.9
Surrenders and benefits ............................ (997.6) (655.1) (467.4)
Product charges .................................... (126.8) (111.9) (90.8)
--------- --------- ---------
Reserves, end of year ................................... $ 7,182.8 $ 7,683.2 $ 6,660.4
========= ========= =========
Fixed Annuities:
Reserves, beginning of year ............................. $ 4,946.4 $ 4,591.3 $ 4,501.8
Premiums, deposits and other policy credits (1) ... 899.1 648.6 360.6
Interest credited .................................. 291.0 262.3 245.0
Surrenders and benefits ............................ (759.2) (547.2) (507.1)
Product charges .................................... (11.5) (8.6) (9.0)
--------- --------- ---------
Reserves, end of year ................................... $ 5,365.8 $ 4,946.4 $ 4,591.3
========= ========= =========
Total Annuities:
Reserves, beginning of year ............................. $12,629.6 $11,251.7 $ 9,746.8
Premiums, deposits and other policy credits (1) ... 2,061.4 1,496.3 1,243.3
Interest credited and investment performance ....... (247.3) 1,204.4 1,335.9
Surrenders and benefits ............................ (1,756.8) (1,202.3) (974.5)
Product charges .................................... (138.3) (120.5) (99.8)
--------- --------- ---------
Reserves, end of year ................................... $12,548.6 $12,629.6 $11,251.7
========= ========= =========
(1) Included in this line for the year ended December 31, 2000 are policy
credits of $18.7 million for fixed annuity and $16.5 million for variable
annuity which were added to annuity reserves as part of the
demutualization.
John Hancock Funds
We offer a variety of mutual fund products and related investment
management services through John Hancock Funds. We employ a team style in the
management of our funds. These teams manage portfolios in accordance with a
variety of specified strategies, which we believe gives us a competitive
advantage over competitors, many of whom deploy only one style across a family
of funds. As of December 31, 2000, our fixed income and equity research staffs
included over 67 portfolio managers and analysts with an average of 16 years of
experience. We are recruiting additional investment professionals to enhance our
capabilities across both fundamental and quantitative analysis and investment
styles. This ongoing commitment to investment research further enables us to
develop new products intended to strengthen our fund offerings, across a broad
array of investment styles.
o Mutual Funds. John Hancock Funds offers a broad array of open-end
mutual funds and closed-end funds to a broad base of consumers across
varying income levels. Open-end mutual funds are subject to redemption
at any time by investors. After their initial public offering, the
shares of closed-end funds are not subject to redemption, and
accordingly represent a more stable base of assets than open-end
funds. As of December 31, 2000, 72.7% of our mutual fund assets under
management were invested in open-end mutual funds. We also offer our
mutual funds as investment options in variable annuities and variable
life insurance products. Our product offerings cover both domestic and
international equity and fixed-income markets. Three new equity mutual
funds were added during 2000: Growth Trends, Focused Relative Value
and Multi-Cap Growth.
o Retirement Services. In 2000 and prior years we offered mutual funds
and record-keeping services to 401(k) plan sponsors, primarily
small-and mid-size companies, on either a full-service or on an
unbundled basis. In March 2001, we sold our full service 401(k)
record-keeping business operated out of John Hancock Funds. We will
continue to
15
manage the assets of the business, the purchaser will assume the
record-keeping and support responsibilities. The business includes
approximately 1,300 plans and 160,000 participants.
We also offer traditional IRA programs and a complete line of
retirement products, including: SIMPLE IRA and SIMPLE 401(k) plans for
companies with no more than 100 eligible employees and no other
qualified plan; Simplified Employee Pensions for companies of any
size, including self-employed persons, partnerships and corporations;
and Roth IRA plans for individuals.
o Institutional Pools of Capital. Through institutional funds and
private accounts, John Hancock Funds manages assets for public pension
plans, high net-worth individuals, corporate pension plans, pooled
separate accounts, union pension plans, foundations and endowments.
The following table presents certain information regarding the assets under
management by John Hancock Funds for the periods indicated:
Asset Flow Summary
For the Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Retail Mutual Funds:
Assets under management, beginning of year ... $27,842.4 $29,248.7 $26,826.2
Deposits and reinvestments .............. 5,389.1 4,010.8 6,242.8
Redemptions and withdrawals ............. (5,540.5) (6,039.6) (4,412.8)
Market appreciation (depreciation) ...... (713.7) 1,051.4 1,044.0
Fees .................................... (435.9) (428.9) (451.5)
--------- --------- ---------
Assets under management, end of year (1) ..... $26,541.4 $27,842.4 $29,248.7
========= ========= =========
Institutional Investment Management:
Assets under management, beginning of year ... $ 4,854.2 $ 5,696.5 $ 4,575.8
Deposits and reinvestments .............. 677.1 494.3 2,184.4
Redemptions and withdrawals ............. (571.2) (1,561.1) (907.2)
Market appreciation (depreciation) ...... 237.3 240.3 (132.4)
Fees .................................... (13.0) (15.8) (24.1)
--------- --------- ---------
Assets under management, end of year ......... $ 5,184.4 $ 4,854.2 $ 5,696.5
========= ========= =========
Total:
Assets under management, beginning of year ... $32,696.6 $34,945.2 $31,402.0
Deposits and reinvestments .............. 6,066.2 4,505.1 8,427.2
Redemptions and withdrawals ............. (6,111.7) (7,600.7) (5,320.0)
Market appreciation (depreciation) ...... (476.4) 1,291.7 911.6
Fees .................................... (448.9) (444.7) (475.6)
--------- --------- ---------
Assets under management, end of year (1) ..... $31,725.8 $32,696.6 $34,945.2
========= ========= =========
(1) Retail mutual fund assets under management includes $5.3 billion, $5.4
billion and $5.0 billion in retirement plan assets at December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998, respectively.
Distribution
Asset Gathering products are distributed through Signator, independent
broker/dealers, banks, directly to state lottery commissions and, both directly
and through pension consultants to retirement plan sponsors.
Signator. Signator, through its broker/dealer and insurance agency
subsidiaries, is the primary distribution channel for our variable annuities. We
also sell fixed annuities, mutual funds, 401(k) programs and other retirement
programs through these entities.
Broker/Dealers. Broker/dealers, which include regional and national
brokerage firms and financial planners, are the primary distribution channel for
our mutual funds. Broker/dealers also sell our fixed and variable annuities. We
support this
16
distribution channel with an internal network of wholesalers. These wholesalers
meet directly with broker/dealers and financial planners and are supported by an
extensive home office sales staff.
Pension Consultants. We market investment management services to pension
consultants nationwide who provide advisory services to plan sponsors. Marketing
efforts are supported by dedicated client relationship officers who keep clients
updated on portfolio performance information.
Banks. Starting with sales of fixed annuities, we have expanded our
offerings through banks to include mutual funds and variable annuities. Starting
in 1998, we added additional products to our bank offerings. We believe we are
well positioned to take advantage of the growth opportunity we see for multiple
product offerings, coupled with added value marketing programs and customized
service support for banks.
Essex Corporation. In January 1999, we purchased Essex Corporation, one of
the nation's largest intermediaries between banks and product manufacturers for
annuities. Essex Corporation also serves as an intermediary in the distribution
of mutual funds. Essex Corporation's primary source of income is commissions on
sales of these products.
Direct Distribution. We are currently offering a variable annuity product
through the direct distribution channel where customers may call a toll-free
number and obtain an application to purchase the product. In the fourth quarter
of 2000, we also launched our e-variable annuity product, which models our term
product aggregator strategy, but in the annuity market.
The table below shows Asset Gathering Segment sales by distribution channel for
the periods indicated:
Asset Gathering Segment Sales by Distribution Channel
For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Broker/Dealers:
Variable annuities ............................. $ 334.7 $ 126.5 $ 155.8
Fixed annuities (1) ............................ 1.3 37.3 29.3
Mutual funds ................................... 3,930.3 2,639.2 4,826.3
Signator:
Variable annuities ............................. 653.0 685.1 709.7
Fixed annuities ................................ 80.6 71.2 75.8
Mutual funds ................................... 616.6 794.9 902.5
Pension Consultants:
Mutual funds .................................. 596.6 317.8 885.9
Banks:
Variable annuities ............................. 130.0 25.7 14.2
Fixed annuities (1) ............................ 189.7 54.4 255.1
Mutual funds ................................... 152.8 127.0 183.0
Essex (included with bank channel prior to 1999):
Variable annuities ............................. 24.7 6.9 --
Fixed annuities ................................ 552.3 422.0 --
Mutual funds ................................... 10.7 20.7 --
Direct Distribution(2) .............................. 0.7 3.5 3.0
Other (2) ........................................... 59.2 63.7 17.6
-------- -------- --------
Total ............................................. $7,333.2 $5,395.9 $8,058.2
======== ======== ========
(1) Sales generated by a certain financial institution of $139.0 million in
2000 are being reclassified from broker/dealer to banks. If this
reclassification were made to prior years, sales of $35.4 million and $29.3
million would have been reclassified from broker/dealer to banks in 1999
and 1998, respectively.
(2) Direct Distribution and Other include single premium immediate annuities,
including lottery-related payout contracts, and supplemental contracts
involving life contingencies.
17
Reserves
We establish and report liabilities for future policy benefits on our
balance sheet to meet the obligations under our annuity contracts. Our liability
for variable annuity contracts and deferred fixed annuity contracts is equal to
the cumulative account balances. Cumulative account balances include deposits
plus credited interest or investment earnings less expense and mortality fees,
as applicable, and withdrawals. Future policy benefits on our immediate fixed
annuity contracts are calculated based on a set of actuarial assumptions that we
establish and maintain throughout the lives of the contracts.
Competition
We face substantial competition in all aspects of our asset gathering
business. The annuity business is highly competitive. We compete with a large
number of insurance companies, investment management firms, mutual fund
companies, banks and others in the sale of annuities. We compete for mutual fund
business with hundreds of fund companies. Many of our competitors in the mutual
fund industry are larger, have been established for a longer period of time,
offer less expensive products, have deeper penetration in key distribution
channels and have more resources than us.
Competition in the asset gathering business is based on several factors.
These include investment performance and the ability to successfully penetrate
distribution channels, to offer effective service to intermediaries and
consumers, to develop products to meet the changing needs of various consumer
segments, to charge competitive fees and to control expenses.
We believe the Asset Gathering Segment is well positioned to increase
assets under management in the face of this competition. Our competitive
strengths include our ability to:
o deliver strong investment performance, and enhance this performance by
expanding the depth and breadth of fundamental research, portfolio
management teams, and investment professionals;
o develop new products and expand into new markets; and
o provide excellent service to investors and distributors.
Distribution and Service Organizations
Within the Asset Gathering Segment, we also include our distribution
company, Signator, and our servicing subsidiary, John Hancock Signature
Services.
Signator is the holding company for Signator Investors, Inc. and several
insurance agencies. Signator Investors, Inc. representatives are able to offer
securities and financial advisory products and services including general
securities trading, wrap account products and other financial instruments to
their clients, including not only John Hancock mutual funds and variable
products, but also the products and services of other companies.
John Hancock Signature Services combines and coordinates customer service
functions for life insurance, annuity and mutual fund customers. The services
provided by John Hancock Signature Services, Inc. include new business
processing, contract change services, claims processing, premium collection and
processing, billing, and preparation of annual or quarterly statements. Through
this subsidiary, we seek to provide an integrated and comprehensive customer
service function on a cost-effective basis. This system permits a customer to
have a single point of contact for most servicing needs.
18
Banking Products and Services
First Signature Bank & Trust Company is a limited-service bank, which
accepts demand deposits but does not make commercial loans. It provides consumer
banking products and services to our customers. First Signature Bank & Trust
Company had $181.8 and $225.4 million in assets as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, respectively.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Asset Gathering
Segment, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment
Overview
Through our Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment (G&SFP),
we offer a variety of specialized products and services to qualified defined
benefit and defined contribution retirement plans, and other domestic and
international institutional buyers. Our products include non-guaranteed,
partially guaranteed and fully-guaranteed general account and separate account
investment options. We distribute these products through home office and
regional sales representatives either directly to institutional buyers or
indirectly through financial intermediaries, consultants and brokers.
The G&SFP Segment contributed 28.7%, 27.6% and 26.0% of consolidated
operating revenues and 28.5%, 33.0% and 29.5% of consolidated after-tax
operating income in the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. The G&SFP Segment generated revenues of $2,409.4, $2,021.8 and
$1,731.2 million and after-tax operating income of $211.6, $201.7 and $145.7
million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. G&SFP Segment Assets are
summarized below:
As of December 31,
------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Assets:
Spread-based products ................... $20,209.1 $18,096.7 $17,311.6
Fee-based products ...................... 10,952.0 12,273.8 12,003.6
--------- --------- ---------
$31,161.1 $30,370.5 $29,315.2
========= ========= =========
Total
Assets Under Management:
Spread-based products ................... $19,514.6 $17,502.2 $16,808.6
Fee-based products ...................... 10,846.1 11,862.8 11,738.0
--------- --------- ---------
$30,360.7 $29,365.0 $28,546.6
========= ========= =========
Products and Markets
The G&SFP Segment offers spread-based products and fee-based products in a
variety of markets. The general account Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC) has
been the predominant product issued in the qualified defined contribution plan
market. Single premium and separate account annuities are primarily limited to
qualified and non-qualified defined benefit plans. Funding agreements are issued
to non-qualified domestic and international institutional investors. By working
closely with our customers to develop customized investment programs, we have
built a leading market share in several important markets, including general
account GICs, funding agreements and single premium annuities.
Spread-Based Products. Our spread-based products provide a guaranteed rate
of return to the customer. We derive earnings on these products primarily from
the difference between the investment returns on the supporting assets and the
guaranteed returns provided to customers. Our spread-based products include both
fund-type products and single premium annuities.
o Fund-type products. Our fund-type products consist of the following:
19
General account GICs. GICs are annuity contracts that pay a guaranteed
rate of return. GICs are primarily marketed to sponsors of
tax-qualified retirement plans such as 401(k) plans. The guaranteed
rate of return on GICs can be a fixed rate or a floating rate based on
an external market index.
Funding agreements. Funding agreements are investment contracts that
pay a guaranteed rate of return. However, funding agreements generally
are issued to corporations, mutual funds and other institutional
investors and, unlike GICs, are not typically used to fund retirement
plans. The guaranteed rate of return on funding agreements can be a
fixed rate or a floating rate based on an external market index.
o Single premium annuities. Single premium annuities are immediate or
deferred annuities which commence payment at a specified time,
typically retirement. The two most common types of annuities are the
straight life annuity, which makes payments for the life of a retired
annuitant, and the joint and survivor annuity, which continues to make
payments to a spouse after the death of the annuitant.
The following table illustrates statutory premiums and deposits and assets
under management for our spread-based products. Statutory premiums and deposits
differ from GAAP premiums because GAAP requires that contributions to general
account GICs and funding agreements be accounted for using deposit accounting.
Deposit accounting excludes the contributions and deposits received and
generally shows only the fees and investment income earned from these products
as revenues.
Spread-Based Products Selected Financial Data
As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Statutory Premiums and Deposits:
Fund-type products
General account GICs .............. $ 1,863.4 $ 2,442.2 $ 2,578.9
Funding agreements ................ 2,578.6 2,775.2 2,416.1
Single premium annuities ............... 594.7 282.4 111.8
--------- --------- ---------
Total ............................. $ 5,036.7 $ 5,499.8 $ 5,106.8
========= ========= =========
Assets Under Management:
Fund-type products
General account GICs .............. $ 8,338.8 $ 9,542.8 $10,329.2
Funding agreements ................ 6,627.1 4,267.9 3,105.7
Single premium annuities ............... 4,548.7 3,691.5 3,373.7
--------- --------- ---------
Total ............................. $19,514.6 $17,502.2 $16,808.6
========= ========= =========
Fee-Based Products. Our fee-based products generally pass the investment
results of invested assets through to the contractholder with no, or minimal,
guarantees. We derive earnings on these products primarily from expense, risk
and profit charges which are generally assessed on the basis of assets under
management. Fee-based businesses provide relatively stable revenues and have
lower capital requirements than do our spread-based businesses. Our fee-based
products include:
o Participating general account fund-type products and annuity
contracts. These products are funding vehicles for pension plans that
pass investment results through to the contractholder, after risk and
profit charges. Annuity guarantees for these products are supported by
asset adequacy requirements under which assets must be maintained at
levels at least 5% above the annuity reserve. If the level of assets
held under the contract falls below this threshold, we may liquidate
assets equal to the annuity reserve and apply the assets to purchase a
fully-guaranteed annuity.
20
o Separate account GICs. These products pass the investment results of a
separate account through to the contractholder and contain only
minimal guarantees. Contractholders may select from among flexible
investment options provided by our various investment managers. The
separate account GIC business leverages the strong marketing
relationships developed in our general account GIC business.
o Participating separate account annuities. These products are funding
vehicles for pension plans which offer customers an insured
pension-funding program in conjunction with a broad range of
investment options, including both equity and fixed-income investment
classes. The risk associated with providing these annuities is
mitigated by excess collateral maintenance requirements, which vary
depending on the investment option selected. If the collateral falls
below the maintenance requirements, we may liquidate assets equal to
the annuity reserve and apply the assets to purchase a
fully-guaranteed annuity.
o Separate investment accounts. These are non-guaranteed group annuity
contracts under which assets are held in a separate account. We
typically use affiliated investment advisors to manage these assets.
We may also use non-affiliated investment managers if the customer so
requires. Because these products do not provide guarantees, most new
sales of separate investment accounts are reported in the Investment
Management Segment. Existing agreements, however, continue to be
reported in and serviced by the Guaranteed and Structured Financial
Products Segment because of customer relationships.
The following table illustrates statutory premiums and deposits and assets
under management for our fee-based products. Statutory premiums and deposits
differ from GAAP premiums because GAAP requires that premiums on general account
participating pension products, separate account GICs, separate account
annuities and separate investment accounts be accounted for using deposit
accounting. Deposit accounting excludes the contributions and deposits received
and generally shows only the fees and investment income earned from these
products as revenues.
Fee-Based Products Selected Financial Data
As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Statutory Premiums and Deposits:
General account participating pension
fund-type products and annuity contracts ............... $ 467.0 $ 527.9 $ 566.7
Separate account GICs ...................................... 50.3 615.7 459.9
Guaranteed separate account annuities ...................... (46.3) (60.4) (27.9)
Separate investment accounts ............................... 288.9 333.1 173.5
--------- --------- ---------
Total ................................................. $ 759.9 $ 1,416.3 $ 1,172.2
========= ========= =========
Assets Under Management:
General account participating pension fund-type products
and annuity contracts ................................... $ 3,188.8 $ 3,357.1 $ 3,466.6
Separate account GICs ...................................... 3,227.3 3,891.0 3,644.5
Guaranteed separate account annuities ...................... 2,056.9 1,977.5 2,113.4
Separate investment accounts ............................... 2,373.1 2,637.2 2,513.5
--------- --------- ---------
Total ................................................. $10,846.1 $11,862.8 $11,738.0
========= ========= ---------
21
Distribution
We distribute our guaranteed and structured financial products through a
variety of channels. General and separate account GICs are sold through our
regional representatives to plan sponsors, or to GIC managers who represent plan
sponsors. Funding agreements are sold either directly, through brokers, or
through investment banks in the form of medium-term notes. Annuities are sold
through pension consultants who represent defined benefit plan sponsors or
through brokers who receive a commission for sales of our products.
We have an experienced sales staff that develop and maintain relationships
with target customers, consultants, and other financial intermediaries. We
believe that our consistent market presence over the past two decades has
created strong and valuable relationships with a large segment of the customer
base.
Spread-Based Products Risk Management
Because of the significant guarantees provided as part of our spread-based
product offerings, risk management is particularly important in this line of
business. To facilitate risk management, we segregate and manage the assets
supporting our spread-based products separately from the rest of our general
account. Our risk management strategy is based on:
o Managing interest rate exposure by closely matching the relative
sensitivity of asset and liability values to interest rate changes,
i.e. controlling the "duration mismatch" of assets and liabilities.
o Using sophisticated systems and processes to project cash flows for
each asset and each liability and to measure with precision the
sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate changes.
o Writing contracts that typically have a predictable maturity structure
and do not have premature surrender or redemption provisions.
o Monitoring all contribution and withdrawal activity in each contract
to anticipate deviations from expected cash flows.
o Establishing working groups with representatives from our various
business units, to facilitate interaction among investment management,
sales management, risk management, financial management and the
pricing staff.
For additional information, see Quantitative and Qualitative Information
about Market Risk, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Underwriting
Underwriting is most significant for the following products in this
segment:
General Account GICs. In developing pricing proposals for new contracts,
our underwriters estimate both base-line cash flows and also likely variance
from the base line due to plan participants reallocating assets from the "stable
value" option of their defined contribution plan. Our underwriters utilize
customized pricing models that generate plan-specific risk charges for each
customer's book value payment provision. If these pricing models project the
risk of losses exceeding customary thresholds, instead of rejecting the
business, our underwriters can modify the proposal by suggesting the use of risk
reduction techniques designed to shift some of the risk of redemptions back to
the plan or to a third party.
Single Premium Annuities. We underwrite immediate annuities using recent
mortality experience and an assumption of continued improvement in annuitant
longevity. We underwrite deferred annuities by analyzing not only mortality risk
but also the expected time to retirement.
22
Reserves
We establish and report liabilities for contractholders' funds and future
policy benefits to meet the obligations on our policies and contracts. Our
liability for general account GICs, funding agreements, and fee-based products
is equal to the cumulative account balances for these products. Cumulative
account balances include deposits plus credited interest or investment earnings
less expense charges and withdrawals. Future policy benefits for our single
premium annuity contracts are calculated based on a set of actuarial assumptions
that we establish and maintain throughout the lives of the contracts. Our
assumptions include investment yields, mortality and the expected time to
retirement.
Competition
Our Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment operates in a
variety of highly competitive institutional markets. Although a large number of
companies offer these products, the market is concentrated. Through the first
three quarters of 2000, seven insurers, including John Hancock, issued
approximately 60% of total GICs and funding agreements issued by U.S. insurance
companies reporting to LIMRA; and five insurers, including John Hancock, issued
more than 70% of total single premium annuities. Our competitors include a
variety of well-recognized insurance companies, domestic and foreign banks and
other institutional investment advisors, many of who are larger than we are and
have greater resources than we do.
We believe that we are able to compete successfully in our markets as a
result of our strong financial ratings, investment management expertise,
national distribution, flexible product design and competitive pricing.
Competition in this market is restricted almost exclusively to insurance
companies with superior or excellent financial ratings. The requirement for
strong financial ratings reduces pressure on margins by limiting the number of
potential competitors and by lowering our cost of funds.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Guaranteed and
Structured Financial Products Segment, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
23
Investment Management Segment
Overview
Through our Investment Management Segment, we provide investment management
services to domestic and international institutions. While this segment includes
primarily assets managed for third-party institutional clients, the investment
professionals providing these services also manage assets underlying our general
account and separate account products, as well as variable life and annuity and
mutual fund products. The Investment Management Segment attracts funds from
corporate and public pension plan sponsors, banks, insurance companies, mutual
funds, and other domestic and international institutions.
The Investment Management Segment represented 26.5%, 31.6% and 31.9% of our
total assets under management as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, which were
$125.2, $127.3 and $124.4 billion, respectively. Investment Management Segment
assets were $3,124.5, $3,531.4 and $3,439.6 million as of December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998, respectively. The Investment Management Segment contributed
$212.0, $189.9 and $143.9 million of consolidated operating revenues and $46.8,
$37.3 and $15.4 million of consolidated after-tax operating income in the years
ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Products and Markets
The Investment Management Segment is primarily a fee-based investment
advisory business in which we do not offer guarantees to our customers. We
provide a variety of investment structures, such as investment advisory client
portfolios, individually managed and pooled separate accounts, registered
investment company funds, bond and mortgage securitizations, and mutual fund
management capabilities.
Our investment management expertise covers a wide range of private and
publicly-traded asset classes and is based on fundamental research and
disciplined, quantitatively-based analysis and asset-liability management. Our
private fixed income, equity, commercial mortgage and alternative asset
operations have strong credit analysis capabilities and deal origination
expertise. These operations enjoy broad networks of relationships with
intermediaries giving them early access to new investment opportunities.
The capabilities of the Investment Management Segment include:
Public Fixed Income and Equity Investments. Through Independence Investment
Associates we provide active stock and bond management to pension funds,
endowments, and other institutions. We provide core, value, growth, medium-cap,
balanced and market neutral investment strategies. We also offer international
stock and bond management.
In addition, we offer active, quantitative investment management services
in the high quality fixed income markets, with a special emphasis on structuring
and managing portfolios of mortgage-backed securities and Treasury securities
combined, when appropriate, with various derivative strategies.
Private Fixed Income, Equity and Alternative Asset Class Investments. We
manage funds for external institutional clients investing in private
fixed-income and equity securities and alternative asset classes. Our strength
is in private placement corporate securities, structured and innovative
transactions and niche investment opportunities. Our completed offerings include
a mezzanine fund investing primarily in subordinated debt with equity
participation features and collateralized bond obligation funds, which have been
marketed domestically and overseas to banks, insurance companies, brokers and
other clients outside of the pension market.
24
We are a leading manager of equity timberland for large tax-exempt
institutional investors, and are among the largest managers of equity farmland
investments. This segment also originates, services and securitizes commercial
mortgages. In addition, we sponsor affordable housing investments that qualify
for Federal tax credits.
The following tables present certain information regarding the assets under
management by the Investment Management Segment for the periods indicated:
Total Assets Under Management By Asset Class
As of December 31,
------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Assets Under Management: (1) (2)
Domestic equity and balanced ............... $19,099.3 $26,940.8 $25,699.0
International equity and balanced .......... 1,840.1 2,242.9 2,340.0
Domestic and international fixed income .... 8,469.3 6,879.6 7,552.1
Timber, farmland and independent power ..... 3,136.0 3,983.9 3,958.5
--------- --------- ---------
Total ................................. $32,544.7 $40,047.2 $39,549.6
========= ========= =========
Asset Flow Summary
For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Assets Under Management:
Assets under management, beginning of year (1) (3) ... $40,047.2 $39,549.6 $34,295.5
Sales and reinvestments .............................. 3,648.3 5,258.6 3,738.9
Redemptions and withdrawals .......................... (9,708.7) (7,984.8) (4,916.8)
Market (depreciation) appreciation ................... (1,442.1) 3,223.8 6,432.0
--------- --------- ---------
Assets under management, end of year (1) (2) ......... $32,544.7 $40,047.2 $39,549.6
========= ========= =========
(1) Includes $1,120.1 million, $1,060.8 million and $1,563.0 million of assets
managed by subsidiaries for our general account for the year ended December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
(2) Does not include $106.9 million, $164.5 million and $88.1 million of
general account cash and invested assets as of December 31, 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively.
(3) Does not include $164.5 million, $88.1 million and $66.0 million of general
account cash and invested assets as of January 1, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
Distribution
We sell our investment management products and services through multiple
distribution channels. Marketing to pension funds, endowments, foundations and
other institutional clients is conducted primarily by our experienced sales
professionals and dedicated marketing and client relationship staff. Products
are also offered through independent marketing specialists, consulting firms,
and investment banking firms.
25
Competition
The institutional asset management industry is highly competitive. We
compete with other investment management firms, insurance companies, banks and
mutual fund companies, many of who are larger and have greater resources than
us. Consolidation activity over the past three years has increased the
concentration of competitors within the industry.
We believe the key bases for competition are investment performance and
customer service. Our competitive strategy focuses on attracting assets through
superior performance. Consistent with this strategy, we continually evaluate
opportunities to develop internally, acquire, or divest investment management
units and strive to improve our investment management products and services. In
addition, we believe our leading role in non-traditional asset classes helps to
create a distinct and competitively advantageous profile in the institutional
asset management marketplace.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Investment
Management Segment, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
26
Corporate and Other Segment
Overview
Our Corporate and Other Segment consists primarily of our international
insurance operations, corporate operations and non-core businesses that are
either in the process of winding down (i.e., are in "run-off") or have been
divested. This segment contributed approximately 20.3%, 17.9% and 16.6% of
consolidated operating revenues and 14.0%, 11.1% and 11.4% of consolidated
after-tax operating income in the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. The Corporate and Other Segment generated revenues of $1,707.6,
$1,310.5 and $1,103.9 million and after-tax operating income of $104.0, $67.8
and $56.3 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
The Corporate and Other Segment assets are summarized below:
For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Assets:
International insurance operations ..... $ 9,703.8 $ 8,810.8 $ 5,222.0
Corporate operations ................... 1,099.3 4,942.3 3,494.0
Non-core businesses .................... 1,106.3 1,212.2 1,894.8
Intra-segment eliminations ............. (4,136.1) (3,948.1) (4,818.3)
--------- --------- ---------
Total ............................. $ 7,773.3 $11,107.2 $ 5,792.5
========= ========= =========
International Insurance Operations
Our international insurance operations include The Maritime Life Assurance
Company, (Maritime) the 8th largest Canadian life insurance company based on
total domestic assets under management at year-end 1999. Maritime distributes a
full range of individual life and health insurance products, investment products
and group life and health products through independent agencies, investment
brokerage firms, and employee benefit brokers and consultants. Our international
insurance operations also offer individual life and group insurance and pension
products through local affiliates doing business in five Southeast Asian
countries. Working with an international network of 45 insurers, we also
coordinate and reinsure group life, health, disability and pension coverage for
foreign and globally mobile employees of multinational companies in more than 50
countries and territories.
We have formed a joint venture life insurance company in China which will
provide us an early foothold in this emerging economy with its vast population.
The joint venture company's license will initially be restricted to operations
in the city of Shanghai. All required regulatory approvals were received during
the fourth quarter of 2000, and operations commenced in January 2001.
27
Corporate Operations
Corporate operations consist principally of (1) investment and treasury
activities, and assets, investment income, interest expense and other expenses
not specifically allocated to segments and (2) group life insurance operations.
Our group life insurance business generated $240.6, $226.2 and $234.5 million in
premium in the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively.
Non-Core Businesses
We have certain non-core businesses that have been divested or put in
run-off, reflecting a strategic decision to focus on our retail and
institutional businesses. Non-core businesses consist primarily of run-off
property and casualty insurance companies that were sold in 1999, a portion of
our group life and accident and health business and related subsidiaries that
were sold in 1997, and other small subsidiaries in various stages of running-off
their operations.
For a further description of operating results, see Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Corporate and
Other Segment, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
General Account Investments
General Account and Separate Accounts
Our investments include assets held in our general account and assets held
in numerous separate accounts. We manage our general account assets in
investment segments that support specific classes of product liabilities. These
investment segments permit us to implement investment policies that both support
the financial characteristics of the underlying liabilities, and also provide
returns on our invested capital. The investment segments also enable us to gauge
the performance and profitability of our various businesses.
Separate account assets are managed in accordance with specific investment
contracts. We generally do not bear any investment risk on assets held in
separate accounts, but rather receive investment management fees based on levels
of assets under management, measured at fair value, as well as mortality fees,
policy administration fees and surrender charges. Generally, assets held in
separate accounts are not available to satisfy general account obligations.
For a further description of our investments, see Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - General Account
Investments, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Ratings
Insurance companies are rated by rating agencies based upon factors
relevant to policyholders. Ratings provide both industry participants and
insurance consumers meaningful information on specific insurance companies.
Ratings with respect to claims-paying ability and financial strength have become
an increasingly important factor in establishing the competitive position of
insurance companies. Higher ratings generally indicate financial stability and a
strong ability to pay claims. John Hancock Life Insurance Company is rated A++
(Superior) by A.M. Best, AAA (Highest) by Fitch IBCA, AA+ (second highest
rating) by S&P, and Aa2 (third highest rating) by Moody's.
We believe that our strong ratings are an important factor in marketing our
products to our distributors and customers, since ratings information is broadly
disseminated and generally used throughout the industry. Our ratings reflect
each rating agency's current opinion of our financial strength, operating
performance and ability to meet our obligations to policyholders, and are not
evaluations directed toward the protection of investors.
28
REGULATION
General
Our business is subject to extensive regulation at both the state and
Federal level, including regulation under state insurance and Federal and state
securities laws.
State Insurance Regulation
The Company and its insurance subsidiaries are subject to supervision and
regulation by the insurance authorities in each jurisdiction in which they
transact business. Currently, we are licensed to transact business in all fifty
states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam,
the Northern Mariana Islands, and 13 Canadian provinces and territories, and
several Asian countries, including one city in the People's Republic of China
and therefore are subject to regulation in all these jurisdictions. Most states
have laws and regulations governing such issues as: what lines of business a
company may engage in; underwriting practices, including a company's ability to
request results of applicants' genetic tests; what premium rates may be charged
in various lines of business; what products a company may sell; mandating
certain insurance benefits and policy forms; minimum rates for accumulation of
cash values and maximum rates for policy loans; licensing of insurance companies
and agents; advertising and marketing practices; statutory accounting and
reporting requirements; reserve requirements and solvency standards; admitted
statutory assets; the appropriate mix of investments; dividend payments;
transactions with affiliates; and acquisitions of control. State insurance
departments periodically review the business and operations of an insurance
company by examining its financial condition and how its agents sell its
products. Our insurance subsidiaries are also required to file various reports
relating to their financial condition, including detailed annual financial
statements. This is required in each jurisdiction where an insurance business is
licensed.
State insurance regulatory authorities and other state law enforcement
agencies and attorneys general from time to time make inquiries concerning
whether our insurance businesses are in compliance with the regulations covering
their businesses. We try to respond to such inquiries in an appropriate way and
to take corrective action if warranted.
The Arizona, New Jersey, Illinois, California and Vermont insurance
departments have ongoing market conduct examinations involving John Hancock Life
Insurance Company. The Company believes that it conducts its business in
accordance with all applicable state regulations and does not expect that the
outcome of these examinations will have a material impact on our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
State insurance regulators and the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners are continually re-examining existing laws and regulations. Among
other things, these laws and regulations may focus on insurance company
investments and solvency issues, risk-adjusted capital guidelines,
interpretations of existing laws, the development of new laws, the
implementation of non-statutory guidelines and the circumstances under which
dividends may be paid.
Regulation Governing Potential Acquisitions of Control
We are subject to regulation under the insurance holding company statutes
of the states in which our insurance subsidiaries are organized, principally
Massachusetts, which is our state of domicile. The Massachusetts insurance law
contains provisions which, in general, provide that the acquisition or change of
"control" of a domestic insurer or of any person that controls a domestic
insurer cannot be consummated without the prior approval of the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Insurance. In general, a presumption of "control" arises from
the ownership, control, possession with the power to vote or possession of
proxies with respect to, 10% or more of the voting securities of an insurer or
of a person that controls an insurer. A person seeking to acquire control,
directly or indirectly, of a Massachusetts insurance company or of any person
controlling a Massachusetts insurance company must file an application for
approval of the acquisition of control with the Massachusetts Commissioner of
Insurance and obtain the approval of the Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance
before consummating the acquisition.
29
In addition, we may in the future become subject to New York insurance law
governing the activities of insurance holding companies. Other state holding
company laws, specifically those of California and Delaware, and similar
Canadian laws, apply to us as well because we have insurance subsidiaries
organized in those jurisdictions. Accordingly, any direct or indirect
acquisition of control of John Hancock Life Insurance Company will be subject to
the prior approval of the California and Delaware Commissioners of Insurance and
the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions in Canada and may
also be subject to the prior approval of the New York Superintendent of
Insurance in the event John Hancock Life Insurance Company is deemed a New York
domestic insurer under the provisions of the New York insurance holding company
law.
In addition to the restrictions under applicable insurance holding company
statutes, the Plan of Reorganization governing our reorganization also
prohibits:
o any person, or persons acting in concert, from directly or indirectly
acquiring or offering to acquire beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the
outstanding shares of our common stock until two years after the effective
date of the reorganization; and
o without prior approval of the board of directors of JHFS and the
Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance, any person, or persons acting in
concert, from directly or indirectly acquiring or offering to acquire
beneficial ownership of 10% or more of the outstanding shares of our common
stock during the one year period following the two-year period described in
the preceding paragraph.
By virtue of these provisions of the Plan of Reorganization, John Hancock Life
Insurance Company may not be subject to an acquisition by another company during
the two years following the effective date of the reorganization and may only be
subject to acquisition in the third year following the effective date of the
reorganization with the approval of the board of directors of JHFS and the
Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance.
All the restrictions described above may deter, delay or prevent a future
acquisition of control, including transactions that could be perceived as
advantageous to our sole stockholder, JHFS.
Regulation of Dividends and Other Payments from Insurance Subsidiaries
As a result of the demutualization of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Company, a parent holding company, called John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.,
has been created. John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. (JHFS) is a holding
company and its primary asset is the outstanding capital stock of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company. As an insurance holding company, JHFS depends primarily
on dividends from John Hancock Life Insurance Company to pay dividends to its
stockholders (other than dividends during the first year following the effective
date of the reorganization) and pay operating expenses. Any inability of John
Hancock Life Insurance Company to pay dividends to JHFS in the future in an
amount sufficient for JHFS to pay dividends to its stockholders and meet its
cash obligations may materially adversely affect the market price of its common
stock and its business, financial condition or results of operations.
The Massachusetts insurance law limits how and when John Hancock Life
Insurance Company can pay dividends to JHFS. Under the Massachusetts insurance
law, no insurer may pay any shareholder dividend from any source other than
statutory unassigned funds without the prior approval of the Massachusetts
Commission of Insurance. The Massachusetts insurance holding company act
requires that a report be given to the Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance
no later than five days following declaration, and at least ten days' prior to
payment, of any dividend or distribution by a Massachusetts insurance company.
Further, this act provides that no extraordinary dividend may be paid without
thirty days' prior written notice to the Massachusetts Commissioner of
Insurance, and only if the Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance has not
disapproved, or has approved, the payment within the thirty day notice period.
An extraordinary dividend is any dividend or distribution of cash or other
property whose fair market value, together with other dividends or distributions
made within the preceding twelve months, exceeds the greater of (1) 10% of an
insurance company's surplus as regards policyholders as of the preceding
December 31, and (2) a life insurance company's statutory net gain from
operations for the twelve months ending on the preceding December 31. John
Hancock Life Insurance Company, in the future, could also be viewed as being
commercially domiciled in New York and, if so, dividend payments may also be
subject to New York's insurance holding company act as well as Massachusetts
law.
30
Surplus and Capital Requirements
Insurance regulators have the discretionary authority, in connection with
the ongoing licensing of our insurance businesses, to limit or prohibit the
ability to issue new policies if, in the regulators' judgment, the insurer is
not maintaining a minimum amount of surplus or is in hazardous financial
condition. Limits may also be established on the ability to issue new life
insurance policies and annuity contracts above an amount based upon the face
amount and premiums of policies of a similar type issued in the prior year.
Risk-Based Capital
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has established
risk-based capital standards for life insurance companies as well as a model act
to apply such standards at the state level. The model act provides that life
insurance companies must submit an annual risk-based capital report to state
regulators reporting their risk-based capital based on four categories of risk:
asset risk, insurance risk, interest rate risk and business risk. The formula is
intended to be used by insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify
possible weakly capitalized companies for purposes of initiating further
regulatory action. John Hancock Life Insurance Company exceeded the level of
risk-based capital that would require it to propose actions to correct a
deficiency by 155% as of December 31, 2000.
Statutory Investment Valuation Reserves
Life insurance companies are required to establish an asset valuation
reserve ("AVR") consisting of two components: (i) a "default component," which
provides for future credit-related losses on fixed maturity investments, and
(ii) an "equity component," which provides for losses on all types of equity
investments, including equity securities and real estate. Insurers also are
required to establish an interest maintenance reserve ("IMR") for net realized
capital gains and losses on fixed maturity securities, net of tax, related to
changes in interest rates. The IMR is required to be amortized into statutory
earnings on a basis reflecting the remaining period to maturity of the fixed
maturity securities sold. These reserves are required by state insurance
regulatory authorities to be established as a liability on a life insurer's
statutory financial statements, but do not affect our financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP. Although future additions to AVR will reduce
the future statutory capital and surplus of John Hancock Life Insurance Company,
we do not believe that the impact under current regulations of such reserve
requirements will materially affect the ability of John Hancock Life Insurance
Company to increase its statutory capital and surplus and pay future dividends
to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc.
IRIS Ratios
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has developed a set
of financial tests known as the Insurance Regulatory Information System ("IRIS")
for early identification of companies which may require special attention by
insurance regulators. Insurance companies submit data on an annual basis to the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners. This data is used to calculate
ratios covering various categories of financial data, with defined "usual
ranges" for each category. IRIS consists of 12 key financial ratios for life
insurance companies. An insurance company may fall out of the usual range with
respect to one or more ratios because of specific transactions that are in
themselves immaterial or eliminated at the consolidated level. Departure from
the usual range on four or more of the ratios may lead to inquiries from
individual states' insurance departments. During the five-year period ended
December 31, 2000, John Hancock Life Insurance Company has not been outside the
usual range for any IRIS ratio except for the net change in capital surplus
ratio for the year 2000. This ratio fell outside the usual range because of the
demutualization transaction. Specifically, under the applicable statutory
accounting rules, the Company was required to exclude the proceeds from the
stock offering from surplus while the demutualization consideration paid in cash
was deducted from surplus, thereby distorting the ratio. This adjustment is not
expected to recur in the year 2001.
Regulation of Investments
Our insurance businesses are subject to state laws and regulations that
require diversification of their investment portfolios. Some of these laws and
regulations also limit the amount of investments in specified investment
categories, such as below investment grade fixed maturity securities, equity
real estate, other equity investments and derivatives. Failure to
31
comply with these laws and regulations would cause investments exceeding
regulatory limitations to be treated as nonadmitted assets for purposes of
measuring statutory surplus, in some instances, requiring divestiture. State
regulatory authorities from the domiciliary states of our insurance subsidiaries
have not indicated any non-compliance with any such regulations.
Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has adopted a revision
to the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation (known as Revised
XXX). This model regulation established new minimum statutory reserve
requirements for certain individual life insurance policies written in the
future. Before the new reserve standards can become effective, individual states
must adopt the model regulation. Massachusetts has adopted the Regulation
effective January 1, 2001. John Hancock has revised its term life insurance
products with guaranteed premium periods and is in the process of revising its
universal life insurance products with no-lapse guarantees. In 2001, John
Hancock will establish increased reserves to be consistent with the new minimum
standards with respect to policies issued after the effective date of the
regulation.
Federal Insurance Initiatives and Litigation
Although the Federal government generally does not directly regulate the
insurance business, federal initiatives often have an impact on our business.
Current and proposed measures that may significantly affect the insurance
business generally include limitations on anti-trust immunity, minimum solvency
requirements and health care reform.
On November 12, 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 became law,
implementing fundamental changes in the regulation of the financial services
industry in the United States. The act permits the transformation of the already
converging banking, insurance and securities industries by permitting mergers
that combine commercial banks, insurers and securities firms under one holding
company. Under the act, national banks retain their existing ability to sell
insurance products in some circumstances. In addition, bank holding companies
that qualify and elect to be treated as "financial holding companies" may engage
in activities, and acquire companies engaged in activities, that are "financial"
in nature or "incidental" or "complementary" to such financial activities,
including acting as principal, agent or broker in selling life, property and
casualty and other forms of insurance, including annuities. A financial holding
company can own any kind of insurance company or insurance broker or agent, but
its bank subsidiary cannot own the insurance company. Under state law, the
financial holding company would need to apply to the insurance commissioner in
the insurer's state of domicile for prior approval of the acquisition of the
insurer, and the act provides that the commissioner, in considering the
application, may not discriminate against the financial holding company because
it is affiliated with a bank. Under the act, no state may prevent or interfere
with affiliations between banks and insurers, insurance agents or brokers, or
the licensing of a bank or affiliate as an insurer or agent or broker.
Tax Legislation
Currently, under the Internal Revenue Code, holders of many life insurance
and annuity products, including both traditional and variable products, are
entitled to tax-favored treatment on these products. For example, income tax
payable by policyholders on investment earnings under traditional and variable
life insurance and annuity products which are owned by natural persons is
deferred during the product's accumulation period and is payable, if at all,
only when the insurance or annuity benefits are actually paid or to be paid.
Also, for example, interest on loans up to $50,000 secured by the cash value of
life insurance policies owned by businesses on key employees is eligible for
deduction even though investment earnings during the accumulation period are
tax-deferred.
In the past, legislation has been proposed that would have curtailed the
tax-favored treatment of some of our life insurance and annuity products. If any
such proposals were enacted, market demand for such products would be adversely
affected. In addition, there are a number of proposals currently being
considered by Congress which would either eliminate or significantly reduce
Federal estate taxes. Many insurance products are designed and sold to help
policyholders reduce the effect of Federal estate taxation on their estates.
Thus, if any legislation that eliminates or significantly reduces Federal estate
taxation is enacted, the Company expects that such development would adversely
affect sales of our insurance and investment advisory products.
32
Securities Laws
Certain of our investment advisory activities are subject to federal and
state securities laws and regulations. Our mutual funds are registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Investment
Company Act. All of our separate investment accounts that fund retail variable
annuity contracts and retail variable life insurance products issued by us,
other than those which fund private placement investment options that are exempt
from registration or support fixed rate investment options that are also exempt
from registration, are registered both under the Securities Act and the
Investment Company Act. Institutional products such as group annuity contracts,
guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements are sold to tax qualified
pension plans or are sold to other sophisticated investors as "private
placements," and are exempt from registration under both acts. Some of our
subsidiaries are registered as broker/dealers under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Securities Exchange Act"), and with the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., and a number are registered as
investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. One subsidiary is
registered as a commodity pool operator and as a commodity trading advisor under
the Commodity Exchange Act. Our insurance companies or other subsidiaries also
own or manage other investment vehicles that are exempt from registration under
the Securities Act and the Investment Company Act but may be subject to other
requirements of those laws, such as antifraud provisions and the terms of
applicable exemptions. We are also subject to similar laws and regulations in
the states and foreign countries in which we provide investment advisory
services, offer the products described above or non-variable life and annuity
products or conduct other securities and investment related activities.
Environmental Considerations
As owners and operators of real property, we are subject to extensive
federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Inherent in such
ownership and operation is the risk that there may be potential environmental
liabilities and costs in connection with any required remediation of such
properties. When deemed appropriate, we routinely conduct environmental
assessments for real estate being acquired for investment and before taking
title to property acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure.
Based on these environmental assessments and compliance with our internal
environmental procedures, we believe that any costs associated with compliance
with environmental laws and regulations or any remediation of such properties
would not be material to our consolidated financial position. Furthermore,
although we hold equity positions in subsidiaries and investments that could
potentially be subject to environmental liabilities, we believe, based on our
assessment of the business and properties of these companies and our level of
involvement in the operation and management of such companies, that we would not
be subject to any environmental liabilities with respect to these investments
which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position
or results of operations.
ERISA Considerations
Certain of our lines of business, including our management of employee
benefit plan assets in our advisory capacity in separate accounts, are subject
to the requirements of ERISA. In addition, the Small Business Job Protection
Act, which we refer to as the SBJPA, offers insurers protection from potential
litigation exposure prompted by the 1993 U.S. Supreme Court decision in John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank, which we
refer to as the Harris Trust Decision, in which the Court held that, with
respect to a portion of the funds held under certain general account group
annuity contracts, an insurer is subject to the fiduciary requirements of ERISA.
The pertinent SBJPA provisions provide that insurers are protected from
liability for breaches of fiduciary duties under ERISA for past actions with
respect to their general account contracts. However, insurers remain subject to
federal criminal law and liable for actions brought by the U.S. Secretary of
Labor alleging breaches of fiduciary duties that also constitute a violation of
federal or state criminal law. The SBJPA also provides that contracts issued
from an insurer's general account on or before December 31, 1998, that are not
guaranteed benefit policies, will not be subject to ERISA's fiduciary
requirements if they meet the requirements of regulations issued by the United
States Department of Labor. The SBJPA further provides that contracts issued
from an insurer's general account after December 31, 1998, that are not
guaranteed benefit policies will be subject to ERISA. In January 2000, the
Department of Labor published a regulation pursuant to the SBJPA which provides,
among other things, that if an employee benefit plan acquired an insurance
policy (other than a guaranteed benefit policy) issued on or before December 31,
1998 that is supported by the assets of the insurer's general account, the
plan's assets for purposes of ERISA will not be deemed to include any of the
assets of the insurer's general account, provided that the requirements of the
regulation are met.
33
Accordingly, if those requirements are met, the insurer is not subject to the
fiduciary obligations of ERISA in connection with such an insurance policy.
These requirements include detailed disclosures to be made to the employee
benefit plan and the requirement that the insurer must permit the policyholder
to terminate the policy on 90 days' notice and receive without penalty, at the
policyholder's option, either (1) the accumulated fund balance (which may be
subject to market value adjustment) or (2) a book value payment of such amount
in annual installments with interest. John Hancock Life Insurance Company
intends to comply with the requirements set forth therein to secure the
exemption provided by the regulations from the fiduciary obligations of ERISA.
However, John Hancock Life Insurance Company's exposure to disintermediation
risk could increase due to the termination options that it would be required to
provide to policyholders. Any such increase, however, would not be material.
Since there has been no final ruling in the Harris Trust case (described under
"Item 3. Legal Proceedings" in this Form 10-K), we are unable at this time to
determine the effects of the decision, and therefore cannot compare the
litigation risk to the disintermediation risk created by compliance with the
regulations. With respect to employee welfare benefit plans subject to ERISA,
the Congress periodically has considered amendments to the law's Federal
preemption provision, which would expose John Hancock Life Insurance Company,
and the insurance industry generally, to state law causes of action, and
accompanying extra-contractual (e.g., punitive) damages in lawsuits involving,
for example, group life and group disability claims. To date, all such
amendments to ERISA have been defeated.
Employees
As of February 28, 2001 we employed approximately 8,503 people. We believe
our relations with our employees are satisfactory.
ITEM 1A. Executive Officers of the Registrant
Omitted
35
ITEM 2. Properties
Our home office consists of our 60-story landmark office tower and five
other buildings located in Boston, Massachusetts. We own this facility and
occupy approximately 53.0% of the 3.8 million gross square feet of space in
these buildings. The balance of the space in these buildings is rented to
commercial tenants. In addition, we lease office space throughout the United
States as needed for our operations, including for our sales force. We believe
that our current facilities are adequate for our current and expected needs.
Since 1987, we have entered into a series of lease agreements with a
non-affiliated organization for the rental of furniture and equipment. The
leases have a non-cancelable term of twelve months and an expected term of
approximately nine years. Annual aggregate commitments under these leases are
approximately $7.8 million.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
Sales Practice Class Action Settlement
Over the past several years, companies engaged in the life insurance
business have faced extensive claims, including class-action lawsuits, alleging
improper marketing and sales of individual life insurance policies or annuities.
On December 31, 1997, the United States District Court for the District of
Massachusetts approved a settlement of a nationwide class action lawsuit
regarding sales practices against John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company,
John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and John Hancock Distributors,
Inc., Duhaime, et al. v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, John
Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and John Hancock Distributors, Inc. With
certain limited exceptions, the class that is bound by the terms of the
settlement includes persons and entities who at any time during the class period
(January 1, 1979 through December 31, 1996) had an ownership interest in one or
more of our whole life, universal life or variable life insurance policies (and
certain annuities and mutual funds) issued during the class period.
In conjunction with this settlement, we have established a reserve that
stood at $172.7 million at December 31, 2000. Given the uncertainties associated
with estimating the reserve, it is reasonably possible that the final cost of
the settlement could differ materially from the amounts presently provided for
by us. We will continue to update this estimate of the final cost of the
settlement as the claims are processed and more specific information is
developed, particularly as the actual cost of the claims subject to alternative
dispute resolution becomes available. However, based on information available at
the time, and the uncertainties associated with the final claim processing and
alternate dispute resolution and arbitration, the range of any additional costs
related to the settlement cannot be estimated with precision.
Harris Trust Litigation
Since 1983, we have been involved in complex litigation known as Harris
Trust and Savings Bank, as Trustee of Sperry Master Retirement Trust No. 2 v.
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (S.D.N.Y. Civ. 83-5491). This lawsuit
originally raised only state law causes of action, but in 1984, the plaintiff
amended the Complaint to allege that John Hancock was a fiduciary and party in
interest under ERISA in rendering investment advice and exercising control over
plan assets. Plaintiff alleged that John Hancock breached its fiduciary duty in
failing to act for the exclusive benefit of plan participants by retaining
excess funds of the plan, by imposing arbitrary charges for a return of plan
funds, by failing to pay an appropriate rate of interest on plan funds, and by
charging the plan excessive compensation. In 1989, the district court dismissed
all of plaintiff's ERISA claims and, in 1991, also dismissed all of plaintiff's
state law claims. The plaintiff appealed to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals,
seeking reversal of several of the district court's rulings, including two of
the rulings regarding the applicability of ERISA to the dispute. The district
court's state law rulings were upheld, and the ERISA rulings were affirmed in
part and reversed in part. Specifically, the Second Circuit upheld the district
court's conclusion that John Hancock was not a fiduciary under ERISA with
respect to the insurance policy as a contract. The Second Circuit, however,
reversed the district court's determination that none of the assets, held by
John Hancock in its general account in connection with this contract were plan
assets, and held that "free funds" associated with this contract constitute plan
assets for ERISA purposes. This decision was appealed to the Supreme Court,
which affirmed the Second Circuit's ruling in 1993. The Department of Labor
filed an amicus brief in support of John Hancock's position on the merits before
the Supreme Court. The case was remanded to the district court. The case was
tried to a federal district court judge in 1997, and the judge issued an opinion
in November 2000.
36
In that opinion the judge determined that John Hancock should have allowed
the Trust to withdraw the free funds by means of an extracontractual payout. The
Court awarded the Trust $13,767,200 in relation to this claim together with
unspecified additional pre-judgment interest on this amount from October 1988.
The Court also determined that Hancock violated its fiduciary duty when it
failed to revalue the liabilities for guaranteed benefits, which had been
established at rates set out in the contract, on a basis which was more
favorable to the Trust. In addition, the Court concluded that certain of
Hancock's internal allocations of expenses and investment income violated ERISA.
Damages in the amount of $5, 724, 528, together with unspecified prejudgment
interest from December 1996, were awarded on these issues. As part of the
relief, the judge ordered the removal of Hancock as a fiduciary to the plan.
The Court also awarded the Plaintiff unspecified fees and costs. Given this
litigation's long history, the amount of these fees and costs, along with the
pre-judgment interest, may substantially exceed the damages already awarded by
the District Court judge. However, we believe that the underlying case was
incorrectly decided and we intend to appeal the lower court's decision.
Notwithstanding what we believe to be the merits of the Company's position in
this case, we are unable to predict the outcome of our appeal; and, if
unsuccessful, our ultimate liability, including fees, costs and interest could
be material with respect to earnings in any given reporting period. However, we
do not believe that any such liability would be material in relation to our
financial position or liquidity.
Other Legal and Regulatory Proceedings
We are regularly involved in other litigation, both as a defendant and as a
plaintiff. The litigation naming us as a defendant ordinarily involves our
activities as a provider of insurance protection products, as well as an
investment adviser, employer and taxpayer. In addition, state regulatory bodies,
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, the National Association
of Securities Dealers, Inc. and other regulatory bodies regularly make inquiries
and, from time to time conduct examinations concerning our compliance with,
among other things, insurance laws, securities laws, and laws governing the
activities of broker/dealers. We do not believe at this time that the ultimate
resolution of any of these legal or regulatory matters that are currently
pending, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Omitted
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for John Hancock Life Insurance Company Common Stock and Related
Stockholder Matters
No trading market exists for John Hancock Life Insurance Company common
stock because John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. (JHFS) owns all of John
Hancock Life Insurance Company's common stock. John Hancock Life Insurance
Company paid $466.0 million in dividends to JHFS in 2000 while no such dividends
were paid on its common stock in 1999, or 1998. See Regulation of Dividends and
Other Payments from Insurance Subsidiaries in the Business section for a
discussion of the limitations of John Hancock Life Insurance Company and its
subsidiaries to pay dividends.
As of February 28, 2001, the Company had issued and outstanding 1,000
shares of common stock at a par value of $10,000 per share.
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
Omitted
ITEM 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Segment Operations
Management's discussion and analysis reviews our consolidated segment
financial condition as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, the consolidated results
of operations for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998 and, where
appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance. This
discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes, included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Forward-Looking Statements
The statements, analyses, and other information contained herein relating
to trends in the Company's operations and financial results, the markets for the
Company's products, the future development of the Company's business, and the
37
contingencies and uncertainties to which the Company may be subject, as well as
other statements including words such as "anticipate," "believe," "plan,"
"estimate," "expect," "intend," "will," "should," "may," and other similar
expressions, are "forward-looking statements" under the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are made based upon management's
current expectations and beliefs concerning future events and their effects on
the Company and may not be those anticipated by management. John Hancock's
actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these
forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties
including, but not limited to, the risks that (1) a significant downgrade in our
ratings for claims-paying ability and financial strength may lead to policy and
contract withdrawals and materially harm our ability to market our products, (2)
elimination of Federal tax benefits for our products and other changes in laws
and regulations (including in particular the possible amendment or repeal of the
Federal Estate Tax) which the Company expects would adversely affect sales of
our insurance and investment advisory products, (3) Massachusetts insurance law
may restrict the ability of John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company to pay
dividends to us, (4) we face increasing competition in our retail and
institutional businesses from mutual fund companies, banks and investment
management firms as well as from other insurance companies, (5) a decline or
increased volatility in the securities markets, and other economic factors, may
adversely affect our business, particularly our variable life insurance, mutual
fund, variable annuity and investment business, (6) our life insurance sales are
highly dependent on a third party distribution relationship, (7) interest rate
volatility may adversely affect our profitability, (8) our net income and
revenues will suffer if customers surrender annuities and variable and universal
life insurance policies or redeem shares of our open-end mutual funds, (9) the
independent directors of our variable series trusts and of our mutual funds
could reduce the compensation paid to us or could terminate our contracts to
manage the funds, (10) under our Plan of Reorganization, we were required to
establish the "closed block" a special arrangement for the benefit of a group of
our policyholders and we may have to fund deficiencies in our closed block, and
any overfunding of the closed block will benefit only the holders of policies
included in the closed block, not any affiliate, or our stockholder, (11) we
will face losses if the claims on our insurance products, or reductions in rates
of mortality on our annuity products, are greater than we projected, (12) we
face risks relating to our investment portfolio, (13) we may experience
volatility in net income due to changes in standards for accounting for
derivatives, (14) we are subject to risk-based capital requirements and possible
guaranty fund assessments, (15) the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners' codification of statutory accounting practices will adversely
affect our statutory surplus, (16) we may be unable to retain personnel who are
key to our business, (17) we face risks from assumed reinsurance business in
respect of personal accident insurance and the occupational accident component
of workers compensation insurance, (18) litigation and regulatory proceedings
may result in financial losses, harm our reputation and divert management
resources, and (19) we face unforeseen liabilities arising from our acquisitions
and dispositions of businesses.
Readers are also directed to other risks and uncertainties discussed, as
well as to further discussion of the risks described above, in other documents
that may be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission from time to time. The Company specifically disclaims any obligation
to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future developments, or otherwise.
Overview
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (the Company) is a leading financial
services company providing a broad range of products and services in two major
businesses: (1) the retail business, which offers insurance protection and asset
gathering products and services primarily to retail consumers; and (2) the
institutional business, which offers guaranteed and structured financial
products and investment management products and services primarily to
institutional customers. In addition, we have a Corporate and Other Segment.
Our revenues are derived principally from:
o premiums on individual life insurance, individual and group long-term
care insurance, annuities with life contingencies, single premium
annuity contracts and group life insurance;
o product charges from variable and universal life insurance products
and annuities;
38
o asset management fees from mutual fund and institutional investment
management products;
o sales charges and commissions derived from sales of investment and
insurance products and distribution fees; and
o net investment income and realized investment gains on general account
assets.
Our expenses consist principally of insurance benefits provided to
policyholders, interest credited on policyholders' general account balances,
dividends to policyholders, other operating costs and expenses, which include
commissions and general business expenses, net of expenses deferred,
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, and premium and income taxes.
Our profitability depends in large part upon: (1) the adequacy of our
product pricing, which is primarily a function of competitive conditions, our
ability to assess and manage trends in mortality and morbidity experience, our
ability to generate investment earnings and our ability to maintain expenses in
accordance with pricing assumptions; (2) the amount of assets under management;
and (3) the maintenance of our target spreads between the rate of earnings on
our investments and credited rates on policyholders' general account balances.
Our sales and financial results of our retail business over the last
several years have been affected by general economic and industry trends.
Variable products, including variable life insurance and variable annuities,
have accounted for the majority of recent increases in total premiums and
deposits for the insurance industry as a result of the strong equity market
growth in recent years and the "baby boom" generation reaching its high-earnings
years and seeking tax-advantaged investments to prepare for retirement. As sales
of variable products have increased, sales of traditional life insurance
products have experienced continued declines. With respect to our long-term care
insurance products, premiums have increased due to the aging of the population
and the expected inability of government entitlement programs to meet retirement
needs.
39
Premiums and deposits of our individual annuity products increased 37.7% to
$2,061.4 million in 2000 as compared to 1999. Our variable life insurance
product deposits in 2000 increased 11.1% to $922.0 million compared to 1999,
while premiums on our individual and group long-term care insurance increased
36.0%, to $294.1 million in 2000 due to the acquisition of the long-term care
business of Fortis, Inc. (Fortis) on March 1, 2000. Primarily due to aggressive
marketing of both retail and institutional investment management services, new
fund offerings, and refocusing the sales organization on regional broker/dealers
and financial planners, mutual fund deposits and reinvestments increased
$1,561.1 million, or 34.7%, to $6,066.2 million in 2000. In addition to the
increase in sales and deposits, redemptions decreased $1,489.0 million, or
19.6%, to $6,111.7 million in 2000 due to conservation initiatives. We have
reduced operating expenses to protect profit margins as we work to stabilize and
grow assets under management in the mutual funds business. However, our mutual
fund operations are impacted by general market trends, and a continued downturn
in the mutual fund market may negatively affect our future operating results.
Recent economic and industry trends also have affected the sales and
financial results of our institutional business. Sales of fund-type products
decreased $775.4 million, or 17.5%, to $4,442.0 million. The decrease is
primarily due to declining demand for general account GICs in the 401(k) plan
market. In response to this trend, we have created new products for the
non-qualified institutional marketplace.
Premiums from single premium annuity contracts increased to $594.7 million
in 2000 from $282.4 million in 1999, driven by the sale of two significant
single premium annuity contracts during the period. Moreover, our investment
management services provided to domestic and international institutions include
services such as investment advisory client portfolios, individually managed and
pooled separate accounts, registered investment company funds, bond and mortgage
securitizations, and mutual fund management capabilities. Assets under
management of our Investment Management Segment decreased to $32,651.6 million
as of December 31, 2000.
The Reorganization
The board of directors of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company
unanimously adopted the Plan of Reorganization on August 31, 1999. Under the
terms of the Plan of Reorganization, effective February 1, 2000, John Hancock
Mutual Life Insurance Company converted from a mutual life insurance company to
a stock life insurance company and became a wholly owned subsidiary of John
Hancock Financial Services, Inc., which is a holding company. In connection with
the reorganization, John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company changed its name
to John Hancock Life Insurance Company.
Under the Plan of Reorganization, as of February 1, 2000, John Hancock Life
Insurance Company, created a closed block for the benefit of policies included
therein. The purpose of the closed block is to protect the policy dividend
expectations of the policies included in the closed block after demutualization.
Unless the Massachusetts Commissioner of Insurance and, in certain
circumstances, the New York Superintendent of Insurance, consent to an earlier
termination, the closed block will continue in effect until the date none of
such policies is in force. As of February 1, 2000, John Hancock Life Insurance
Company segregated closed block assets of $9,343.0 million, an amount that is
expected to produce cash flows which, together with anticipated revenues from
policies included in the closed block, is expected to be reasonably sufficient
to provide for payment of policy benefits, taxes and direct asset acquisition
and disposal costs, and for continuation of policy dividend scales payable in
1999, so long as the experience underlying such dividend scales continues. The
assets allocated to the closed block and any cash flows provided by these assets
will solely benefit the holders of policies included in the closed block. Total
closed block liabilities were $12,118.3 million as of February 1, 2000.
For additional information on the creation of the closed block see Note 6
to our audited consolidated financial statements.
40
Costs relating to the demutualization, excluding costs relating to the
offering, were $129.1 million net of income taxes, of which $17.0 million was
recognized in the year ended December 31, 2000. Demutualization expenses include
printing and mailing costs and our aggregate cost of engaging independent
accounting, actuarial, financial, investment banking, legal and other
consultants to advise us. In addition, our costs include the costs of the staff
and advisors of the Massachusetts Division of Insurance, the New York Insurance
Department as to the demutualization process and related matters.
Transactions Affecting Comparability of Results of Operations
Disposed Business
We have completed a number of transactions which have affected the
comparability of our results of operations. On March 31, 1999, we completed the
sale of Unigard Security Insurance Company ("USIC") and John Hancock Insurance
Co. of Bermuda Ltd. ("John Hancock Bermuda"). The sale of USIC was completed by
entering into a 100% quota share reinsurance agreement with a third party
reinsurer and then through a stock sale. We also sold 100% of the stock of John
Hancock Bermuda, which offered reinsurance products and services. Assets and
liabilities transferred in connection with both sales amounted to $381.0 million
and $161.8 million, respectively. The sale of USIC resulted in an after-tax loss
of $21.4 million. John Hancock Bermuda was sold for its net book value which
resulted in the recognition of no gain or loss.
Corporate Account Asset Transfer
We established a "corporate account" as part of our Corporate and Other
Segment to facilitate our capital management process. The corporate account
contains capital not allocated to support the operations of our business
segments.
Late in the fourth quarter of 1999, we transferred certain assets from the
business segments to the corporate account. These assets include investments in
certain subsidiaries and the home office real estate complex (collectively
referred to as "corporate purpose assets"). Historically, we have allocated the
investment performance or other earnings of corporate purpose assets among all
of our business segments. However, subsequent to the conversion to a stock life
insurance company, we centrally manage the performance of corporate purpose
assets through the corporate account.
We accounted for the transfer of the corporate purpose assets between the
business segments and the corporate account at historical cost. Because of the
participating features of the affected group participating contracts, we believe
that the transfer of corporate purpose assets was analogous to their sale. Group
participating contractholders are entitled to receive the proceeds from assets
sold from the segment. As a result, we recognized an expense to increase our
liability to affected group participating contractholders for their
proportionate share of the appreciation of the corporate purpose assets
transferred. For the other business segments, differences between the historical
cost of the assets transferred and the fair value of amounts received by the
business segments was recorded as a capital adjustment by each segment. The
transfer during the fourth quarter of 1999 resulted in a charge to operations in
1999 of $205.8 million, net of tax. The Company recorded a $5.7 million
after-tax credit to operations in the first quarter of 2000 related to revised
estimates for the transaction.
Transactions Occurring Subsequent to Year End
In February 2001, the Company announced that it signed letters of intent
with two reinsurers covering 50% of its closed block business. The treaties are
structured so they will not affect policyholder dividends or any other financial
items reported within the closed block, which was established at the time of the
Company's demutualization to protect the reasonable dividend expectations of
certain participating life insurance policyholders. The reinsurance agreements
cost approximately $3.0 million pre-tax and result in making several hundred
million dollars in statutory capital available for further business development
or other purposes, the timing of which will be dependent on a number of
circumstances. In addition, on March 2, 2001, the Company announced the sale of
the retirement plan recordkeeping business operated out of the mutual fund
subsidiary of the Company, John Hancock Funds. It is estimated that an after-tax
charge of approximately $9 million will be recorded in the first quarter of 2001
and that the Company will initially sever 31 employees, with additional
severances planned. The Company will continue to manage the assets of the
business, the purchaser will assume the recordkeeping and support
responsibility.
41
Results of Operations
The table below presents our consolidated results of operations and
consolidated financial information for the years ended 2000, 1999 and 1998.
For the Year Ended December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------
2000
-----------------------------------------
(in millions)
Non Closed Result of
Block Closed Block Operations 1999 1998
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenues
Premiums ................................. $2,190.4 $ 865.0 $3,055.4 $2,411.3 $2,109.0
Universal life and investment-
type product charges ................... 746.7 -- 746.7 703.3 597.0
Net investment income .................... 3,251.0 591.6 3,842.6 3,568.5 3,328.0
Net realized investment gains
(losses), net of related
amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and
amounts credited to
participating pension
contractholders (1) .................... 83.9 11.7 95.6 175.2 106.1
Investment management revenues,
commissions, and other fees ............ 764.8 -- 764.8 680.9 659.7
Other revenue (expense) .................. (13.9) (0.6) (14.5) 0.1 10.3
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total revenues ......................... 7,022.9 1,467.7 8,940.6 7,539.3 6,810.1
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders,
excluding amounts related
to net realized investment
gains credited to
participating pension
contractholders (2) .................... 4,092.5 870.0 4,962.5 5,133.0 4,082.6
Other operating costs and
expenses ............................... 1,507.7 (10.0) 1,497.7 1,384.4 1,357.8
Amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs,
excluding amounts related
to net realized investment
gains (3) .............................. 183.8 76.5 260.3 164.2 261.2
Dividends to policyholders ............... 157.3 407.1 564.4 501.6 473.2
Demutualization expenses ................. 10.6 -- 10.6 96.2 18.0
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total benefits and expenses ............ 5,951.9 1,343.6 7,295.5 7,279.4 6,192.8
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes,
minority interest and
cumulative effect of
accounting change ...................... 1,071.0 124.1 1,195.1 259.9 617.3
Income taxes ............................... 344.4 -- 344.4 97.9 174.1
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before minority interest
and cumulative effect of
accounting change ...................... 726.6 124.1 850.7 162.0 443.2
Minority interest .......................... (10.6) -- (10.6) (1.6) (1.1)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Income before cumulative effect
of accounting change ................. 716.0 124.1 840.1 160.4 442.1
Cumulative effect of accounting change ... -- -- -- (9.7) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net income ................................. $ 716.0 $ 124.1 $ 840.1 $ 150.7 $ 442.1
======== ======== ======== ======== ========
(1) Net of related amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and
amounts credited to participating pension contractholders of $6.0 million,
$85.8 million, and $120.3 million for the years ended 2000, 1999, and 1998,
respectively.
(2) Excluding amounts related to net realized investment gains credited to
participating pension contractholders of $6.9 million, $35.3 million, and
$79.1 million for the years ended 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively.
(3) Excluding amounts related to net realized investment gains of $(0.9)
million, $50.5 million, and $41.2 million for the years ended 2000, 1999,
and 1998, respectively.
42
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999
Consolidated income before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative
effect of accounting change of $1,195.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2000 increased by $935.2 million, or 359.8%, as compared to consolidated income
before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting
change of $259.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1999. The increase was
primarily attributable to increases in income before income taxes, minority
interest and cumulative effect of accounting change of $235.6 million in the
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment, $597.6 million in the
Corporate and Other Segment, $65.9 million in the Asset Gathering Segment $0.3
million in the Protection Segment and $35.8 million in the Investment Management
Segment. The increase in the Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products
Segment was primarily due to the recognition of a $345.5 million pre-tax charge
in the prior year for compensation of group participating contractholders for
assets transferred in conjunction with the formation of the corporate account.
The increase in the Corporate and Other Segment was primarily due to a $208.6
million pre-tax charge in the prior year for our exposure to losses under our
Workers' Compensation reinsurance programs, including Unicover Managers, Inc.,
that was associated with the group business we sold in 1998 and a $140.2 million
pre-tax charge in the prior year in connection with the class action settlement.
The increase in the Asset Gathering Segment was primarily due to an improvement
in realized gains from the prior year: $15.4 million in realized gains were
recognized in 2000 compared to $11.0 million in realized losses in 1999. In
addition, demutualization and restructuring expenses decreased compared to the
prior year. The Protection Segment remained relatively stable compared to the
prior year due to increased net investment income and fee income partially
offset by decreased realized gains. The increase in the Investment Management
Segment was due primarily to higher investment advisory fees resulting from an
incentive fee on contract restructuring and performance fees earned by the
mezzanine fund manager.
Premium revenue was $3,055.4 million for 2000, an increase of $644.1
million, or 23.7%, from $2,411.3 million in 1999. The increase was primarily due
to an increase in premiums in the Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products
Segment, including the sale of two significant single premium annuity contracts,
and a $117.5 million increase, or 8.2%, in the Protection Segment primarily due
to premiums on individual long-term care insurance products from the acquisition
of a block of business.
Universal life and investment-type product charges were $746.7 million for
2000, an increase of $43.4 million, or 6.2%, from $703.3 million in 1999. These
product charges consist primarily of cost of insurance fees on our variable life
insurance and universal life insurance products and mortality and expense fees
on our variable annuity products. The increase was primarily due to higher cost
of insurance fees resulting from growth in the average account values in
universal life insurance products and higher average variable annuity
liabilities and surrender fees.
Net investment income was $3,842.6 million for 2000, an increase of $274.1
million, or 7.7%, from $3,568.5 million in 1999. Net investment income in the
prior year includes $9.0 million in net investment income earned in operations
of disposed businesses in 1999. The increase was primarily the result of higher
average invested assets, which increased $3,206.9 million, or 6.0%, to $49,964.5
million in 2000, as compared to $46,757.6 million in 1999. The net yield on
average invested assets increased to 7.73% in 2000. The increase in yield from
the prior year is consistent with the average market rates in 2000 compared to
1999, the average 10-year U.S. Treasury rate in 2000 was 34 basis points higher
than in 1999.
Net realized gains on investments were $95.6 million for 2000, a decrease
of $79.6 million from $175.2 million in 1999. Net realized gains in the prior
year include $23.0 million in net realized losses in the operations of disposed
businesses in 1999. The decrease was primarily the result of 1999 gains on sales
of real estate relating to the planned program to divest the Company of much of
its real estate portfolio. The Company recognized an estimated $115.1 million in
realized gains from the sales of real estate in the prior year compared to net
realized losses of approximately $21.1 million in 2000.
43
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees were $764.8
million, an increase of $83.9 million, or 12.3%, from $680.9 million in 1999.
The increase was the result of an increase in the Investment Management segment
which increased $45.9 million primarily due to the $45.3 million incentive fee
received on the restructuring of a timber management contract and the favorable
settlement of a lawsuit.Underwriting and distribution fees increased $25.7
million primarily resulting from the increase in front-end load mutual fund
sales, partially offset by a decrease in deferred sales charges due to improved
retention of existing accounts. Mutual fund advisory fees declined $6.4 million
in 2000, primarily due to lower average assets under management along with a
slight decline in the average investment advisory fee rate, as fixed income
assets, which bear a lower advisory fee than equity assets, increased as a
percentage of total assets.
Other revenue was $(14.5) million in 2000, a decrease of $14.6 million, or
146.0%, from $0.1 million reported in 1999. Other revenue in the prior year
includes $2.9 million in other losses in the operations of disposed businesses
in 1999.
Benefits to policyholders were $4,962.5 million for 2000, a decrease of
$170.5 million, or 3.3%, from $5,133.0 million in 1999. Benefits to
policyholders in the prior year includes $243.6 million in the operations of
disposed businesses in 1999. The decrease was primarily due to recognizing a
$345.5 million pre-tax charge in the prior year for compensation of group
participating contractholders for assets transferred in conjunction with the
formation of the corporate account, a $208.6 million pre-tax charge in the prior
year for our exposure to losses under our Workers' Compensation reinsurance
programs, including Unicover Managers, Inc., that was associated with the group
business we sold in a prior year, a $140.2 million pre-tax charge in the prior
year in connection with the class action settlement involving individual life
insurance policies sold from 1979 through 1996, and $61.7 million in reserves
established in the prior year for incurred but unreported deaths identified as a
result of the policyholder demutualization mailing. Partially offsetting these
decreases in benefits to policyholders from the prior year were a $349.1
million, or 56.5% increase primarily due to increased single premium annuity
business, a $200.2 million increase primarily attributable to the acquisition of
Aetna Canada which is included in our results for a full year in 2000, and a
$72.0 million increase due to our Fixed Annuities business on the sales of
single premium immediate annuities. In addition, we experienced an increase of
$158.8 million increase in benefits on individual long-term care insurance
products, primarily due to the acquisition of the long-term care business of
Fortis, Inc. as of March 1, 2000.
Other operating costs and expenses were $1,497.7 million for 2000, an
increase of $113.3 million, or 8.2%, from $1,384.4 million for 1999. The
increase was primarily due to the acquisition of Aetna Canada as of October 1,
1999 and the long-term care business of Fortis, Inc. as of March 1, 2000. In
addition, other operating costs increased in the Investment Management Segment
primarily resulting from the $15.7 million in incentive compensation payments
related to incentive fees on a timber management contract and $9.1 million in
performance fees paid for the management of the mezzanine fund.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs was $260.3 million for
2000, a increase of $96.1 million, or 58.5%, from $164.2 million for 1999. The
increase was primarily due to higher amortization expense on non-traditional
life insurance products resulting from higher current net investment income
increasing margins in the business during 2000 which increased amortization of
deferred acquisition costs. In addition, amortization expense increased in the
Variable Annuity business, primarily resulting from poor separate account
performance during 2000, which resulted in revised projections of estimated
gross profits based upon decreases in estimated future margins thus increasing
current amortization.
Dividends to policyholders were $564.4 million in 2000, an increase of
$62.8 million, or 12.5%, from $501.6 million in 1999. The increase primarily
resulted from normal growth in dividends on traditional life insurance products.
Demutualization expenses were $10.6 million for 2000, a decrease of $85.6
million, or 89.0%, from $96.2 million for 1999. The decrease was related to the
extensive preparations for the demutualization occurring in 1999. These expenses
include printing and mailing fees, fees of the regulators' advisors and our
financial, legal, actuarial and accounting advisors. While demutualization
expenses were previously classified as an extraordinary item in our financial
results, recent accounting literature now requires demutualization expenses be
classified as a single line item within income from continuing operations.
Income taxes were $344.4 million in 2000, compared to $97.9 million for
1999. Income taxes in the prior year includes $113.8 million in income tax
credits due to the loss from operations of disposed businesses in 1999. Our
effective tax rate was 29.2% in 2000, as compared to 28.4% in 1999, taking into
account the prior year income tax credit generated from operations of disposed
businesses . We had been subject to the surplus tax (add-on tax) imposed on
mutual life insurance companies which disallows a portion of mutual life
insurance company's policyholder dividends as a deduction from taxable income.
As
44
a stock company, we are no longer subject to the surplus tax.
Minority interest of $10.6 million in 2000 increased from $1.6 million in
1999 primarily due to the sale of a portion of an affiliate to our parent
company.
45
Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998
Consolidated income before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative
effect of accounting change of $259.9 million for the year ended December 31,
1999 decreased by $357.4 million, or 57.9%, as compared to consolidated income
before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of accounting
change of $617.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1998. The decrease was
primarily attributable to decreases in income before income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change of $204.9 million in the Guaranteed and Structured
Financial Products Segment, $191.1 million in the Corporate and Other Segment,
and $45.2 million in the Asset Gathering Segment. These decreases were offset by
increases of $44.3 million in the Protection Segment and $39.5 million in the
Investment Management Segment. The decrease in the Guaranteed and Structured
Financial Products Segment was primarily due to recognizing a $345.5 million
pre-tax charge for compensation of group participating contractholders for
assets transferred in conjunction with the formation of the corporate account.
The decrease in the Corporate and Other Segment was primarily due to a $208.6
million pre-tax charge for our exposure to losses under our Workers'
Compensation reinsurance programs, including Unicover Managers, Inc., that was
associated with the group business we sold in 1997 partially offset by lower
pre-tax charges in connection with the class action settlement of $140.2 million
in 1999 compared to $230.8 million in 1998. The decrease in the Asset Gathering
Segment was primarily due to lower investment advisory fees earned from our
mutual fund operations. The increase in the Protection Segment was primarily due
to higher realized investment gains on real estate, higher fee income on
variable life insurance products, and favorable claims experience on long-term
care insurance products. The increase in the Investment Management Segment was
due primarily to higher investment advisory fees resulting from growth in assets
under management and higher realized investment gains on sales of mortgage
loans.
Premium revenue was $2,411.3 million for 1999, an increase of $302.3
million, or 14.3%, from $2,109.0 million in 1998. The increase was primarily due
to an increase in premiums in the Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products
Segment, including the sale of one significant single premium annuity contract
during the period, and a $58.1 million increase, or 26.6%, in the Protection
Segment for premiums on individual long-term care insurance products.
Universal life and investment-type product charges were $703.3 million for
1999, an increase of $106.3 million, or 17.8%, from $597.0 million in 1998.
These product charges consist primarily of cost of insurance fees on our
variable life insurance and universal life insurance products and mortality and
expense fees on our variable annuity products. The increase was primarily due to
higher cost of insurance fees resulting from growth in the average amount of
variable life insurance in force and higher average variable annuity separate
account liabilities. Investment-type product charges in the Guaranteed and
Structured Financial Products Segment also increased as a result of higher sales
of single premium annuity contracts and separate account GICs.
Net investment income was $3,568.5 million for 1999, an increase of $240.5
million, or 7.2%, from $3,328.0 million in 1998. The increase was primarily the
result of higher average invested assets, which increased $3,447.3 million, or
8.0%, to $46,757.6 million in 1999, as compared to $43,310.3 million in 1998.
The net yield on average invested assets was 7.62% for 1999 and 1998. Yields
were positively impacted in 1999 from lower investment expenses offset by the
general decline in market interest rates.
Net realized gains on investments were $175.2 million for 1999, an increase
of $69.1 million from $106.1 million in 1998. The increase was primarily the
result of increased gains on sales of real estate relating to the program
initiated in 1998 to sell more than 150 of the properties in our real estate
portfolio in order to take advantage of the strong real estate market and reduce
our general account investment in real estate.
Realized gains on sales of real estate increased $66.6 million to $115.1
million in 1999 from $48.5 million in 1998.
46
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees were $680.9
million, an increase of $21.2 million, or 3.2%, from $659.7 million in 1998. The
increase was the result of higher institutional investment advisory fees which
increased $18.3 million primarily due to growth in average institutional assets
under management at Independence Investment Advisors, our investment advisory
subsidiary. Average institutional assets under management increased 13.5% to
$40,554.7 million in 1999. Underwriting and distribution fees increased $12.2
million primarily resulting from our acquisition of the Essex Corporation, a
distributor of annuities and mutual funds through banks, in January 1999.
Partially offsetting these increases, mutual fund advisory fees declined $8.1
million in 1999, primarily due to lower average assets under management along
with a slight decline in the average investment advisory fee rate, as fixed
income assets, which bear a lower advisory fee than equity assets, increased as
a percentage of total assets.
Other revenue was $0.1 million in 1999, a decrease of $10.2 million, or
99.0%, from $10.3 million reported in 1998.
Benefits to policyholders were $5,133.0 million for 1999, an increase of
$1,050.4 million, or 25.7%, from $4,082.6 million in 1998. The increase was
primarily due to higher sales of single premium annuity contracts, a $345.5
million increase in benefits related to the compensation of group participating
contractholders for assets transferred in conjunction with the formation of the
corporate account, a $140.7 million increase in benefits on traditional life
insurance products due to higher death benefits, including $61.7 million of
reserves established for incurred but unreported deaths identified as a result
of the policyholder demutualization mailing, a $113.2 million increase in
benefits related to the settlement of a class action lawsuit involving
individual life insurance policies sold from 1979 through 1996 and a $63.2
million increase in benefits on individual long-term care insurance products,
resulting from higher sales.
Other operating costs and expenses were $1,384.4 million for 1999, an
increase of $26.6 million, or 2.0%, from $1,357.8 million for 1998. The increase
was primarily due to $26.3 million in restructuring charges during 1999 and
increased interest and related expenses of $9.0 million in the Investment
Management Segment primarily resulting from the formation of a collateralized
bond obligation during the second quarter of 1998. These increases were
partially offset by a $20.9 million decrease in interest expense on prior year
taxes.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs was $164.2 million for
1999, a decrease of $97.0 million, or 37.1% from $261.2 million for 1998. The
decrease was primarily due to lower amortization expense on non-traditional life
insurance products resulting from revised projections of estimated gross profits
based upon increases in estimated future interest margins and mortality margins.
In addition, amortization expense on traditional life insurance products
decreased due to lower profits, primarily resulting from $61.7 million of
previously unreported deaths identified as a result of the policyholder
demutualization mailing.
Dividends to policyholders were $501.6 million in 1999, an increase of
$28.4 million, or 6.0%, from $473.2 million in 1998. The increase primarily
resulted from normal growth in dividends on traditional life insurance products.
Demutualization expenses were $96.2 million for 1999, an increase of $78.2
million, or 434.4%, from $18.0 million for 1998. The increase was related to the
extensive preparations in 1999 for the demutualization. These expenses include
printing and mailing fees, fees of the regulators' advisors and our financial,
legal, actuarial and accounting advisors. While demutualization expenses were
previously classified as an extraordinary item in our financial results, recent
accounting literature now requires demutualization expenses be classified as a
single line item within income from continuing operations.
Income taxes were $97.9 million in 1999, compared to $174.1 million for
1998. Our effective tax rate before the surplus tax was 37.9% in 1999, as
compared to 28.4% in 1998. We had been subject to the surplus tax (add-on tax)
imposed on mutual life insurance companies which disallows a portion of mutual
life insurance company's policyholder dividends as a deduction from taxable
income. As a stock company, we are no longer subject to the surplus tax.
47
Minority interest of $1.6 million was consistent with the prior year
balance of $1.1 million.
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax was $9.7 million in
1999. During 1999, we adopted Statement of Position 98-5, Reporting the Costs of
Start-up Activities, which requires that start-up costs capitalized prior to
January 1, 1999 be written off and any future start-up costs be expensed as
incurred. We wrote off the unamortized balance of capitalized start-up costs
related to our closed-end mutual funds in 1999.
Results of Operations by Segment
We evaluate segment performance and base management's incentives on segment
after-tax operating income, which excludes the effect of net realized investment
gains and losses and unusual or non-recurring events and transactions. Segment
after-tax operating income is determined by adjusting GAAP net income for net
realized investment gains and losses, and certain other items which we believe
are not indicative of overall operating trends. While these items may be
significant components in understanding and assessing our consolidated financial
performance, we believe that the presentation of segment after-tax operating
income enhances the understanding of our results of operations by highlighting
net income attributable to the normal, recurring operations of the business.
However, segment after-tax operating income is not a substitute for net income
determined in accordance with GAAP.
48
A discussion of the adjustments to GAAP reported income, many of which
affect each operating segment, follows. A reconciliation of segment after-tax
operating income, as adjusted, to GAAP reported net income precedes each segment
discussion.
For the Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
Segment Data: (1) (in millions)
Segment after-tax operating income:
Protection Segment ..................................... $252.2 $188.7 $166.1
Asset Gathering Segment ................................ 128.8 115.1 111.1
------ ------ ------
Total Retail ........................................ 381.0 303.8 277.2
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment ... 211.6 201.7 145.7
Investment Management Segment .......................... 46.8 37.3 15.4
------ ------ ------
Total Institutional ................................. 258.4 239.0 161.1
Corporate and Other Segment ............................ 104.0 67.8 56.3
------ ------ ------
Total segment income ................................... 743.4 610.6 494.6
After-tax adjustments: (1)
Realized investment gains, net (1) ..................... 64.5 120.0 93.7
Class action lawsuit ................................... -- (91.1) (150.0)
Workers' compensation reinsurance reserve .............. -- (133.7) --
Restructuring charges .................................. (12.0) (17.0) --
Corporate account asset transfer ....................... 5.7 (205.8) --
Demutualization expenses ............................... 2.5 (93.6) (11.7)
Other demutualization related costs .................... (10.0) (6.8) --
Surplus tax ............................................ 46.0 (22.2) 15.5
------ ------ ------
Total after-tax adjustments ............................ 96.7 (450.2) (52.5)
------ ------ ------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect ........................ 840.1 160.4 442.1
of accounting change
Cumulative effect of accounting change ................. -- (9.7) --
------ ------ ------
Net income ............................................. $840.1 $150.7 $442.1
====== ====== ======
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this Management's
Discussion and Analysis.
Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income
Our GAAP reported net income was significantly affected by net realized
investment gains and losses and unusual or non-recurring events and transactions
presented above as after-tax adjustments. A description of these adjustments
follows.
49
In all periods, net realized investment gains and losses, except for gains
and losses from mortgage securitizations and investments backing our short-term
funding agreements, have been excluded from segment after-tax operating income
due to their volatility between periods and because such data are often excluded
by analysts and investors when evaluating the overall financial performance of
insurers. The volatility between periods can be impacted by fluctuations in the
market, as well as by changes in the volume of activity which can be influenced
by us and our investment decisions. Realized investment gains and losses from
mortgage securitizations and investments backing our short-term funding
agreements were not excluded from segment after-tax operating income because we
view the related gains and losses as an integral part of the core business of
those operations.
Net realized investment gains have been reduced by: (1) amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs to the extent that such amortization results
from realized gains and losses and (2) the portion of realized gains and losses
credited to certain participating contractholder accounts. We believe presenting
realized investment gains and losses in this format provides information useful
in evaluating our operating performance. This presentation may not be comparable
to presentations made by other insurers. Summarized below is a reconciliation of
(a) net realized investment gains per the consolidated financial statements and
(b) the adjustment made for net realized investment gains to calculate segment
after-tax operating income for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.
For the Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
Net realized investment gains ....................... $ 89.9 $261.0 $226.4
Add capitalization/less (amortization) of
deferred policy acquisition costs related to
net realized investment gains .................... 0.9 (50.5) (41.2)
Less amounts credited to participating pension
contractholder accounts .......................... (6.9) (35.3) (79.1)
------ ------ ------
Net realized investment gains, net of related
amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs and amounts credited to participating
pension contractholders per consolidated
financial statements ............................. 83.9 175.2 106.1
Less realized investment (losses) attributable
to mortgage securitizations and investments
backing short-term funding agreements ............ 3.2 (27.7) (42.1)
Net realized investment gains in the closed block ... 11.7 -- --
Less gain on sale of business ....................... -- (33.0) --
------ ------ ------
Realized investment gains, net - pre-tax ............ 92.4 169.9 148.2
adjustment to calculate segment operating
income
Less income tax effect .............................. (27.9) (49.9) (54.5)
Realized investment gains (losses), net -
after-tax adjustment to calculate segment
operating income ................................. $ 64.5 $120.0 $ 93.7
====== ====== ======
During 2000 and 1999, we incurred restructuring charges to reduce costs and
increase future operating efficiency by consolidating portions of our
operations. For additional information regarding restructuring charges see Note
1 to our audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
During 2000 and 1999, we recorded amounts for the transfer of certain
assets from the Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment to the
corporate account. These assets included investments in certain subsidiaries and
the home office real estate complex (collectively referred to as "corporate
purpose assets"). Certain group contracts have participating features, under
which crediting rates and dividends are affected directly by portfolio earnings.
Certain participating
50
contractholders participate in contract experience related to net investment
income and realized capital gains and losses in the general account. These
participating contractholders were compensated for transferred assets based on
the fair value of the assets transferred. The difference between the fair value
and carrying value of the assets transferred were credited to affected
participating contractholders through the crediting rates and dividends on their
contracts.
In December 2000, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) issued Statement of Position (SOP) 00-3, "Accounting by Insurance
Enterprises for Demutualizations and Formations of Mutual Insurance Holding
Companies and Certain Long-Duration Participating Contracts." The SOP, which was
adopted with respect to accounting for demutualization expenses by the Company
on December 15, 2000, requires that demutualization related expenses be
classified as a single line item within income from continuing operations and
should not be classified as an extraordinary item. The adoption of SOP 00-3
resulted in the reclassification of demutualization expenses previously recorded
as an extraordinary item in 1999 and 1998 of $93.6 million and $11.7 million,
respectively (net of tax of $2.6 million and $6.3 million, respectively). In
addition, the Company recognized $6.8 million (net of tax of $3.8 million) of
demutualization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2000. The Company
considers demutualization expenses to be an adjustment to GAAP recorded net
income.
During 2000 and 1999, we incurred demutualization related expenses to
improve our financial analysis and financial reporting abilities. These charges
primarily included consulting fees and planning and expense management costs.
During 1997, we entered into a court approved settlement relating to a
class action lawsuit involving individual life insurance policies sold from 1979
through 1996, as specified in the Legal Proceedings section of this Form 10-K.
In entering into the settlement, we specifically denied any wrongdoing. The
reserve held in connection with the settlement to provide for relief to class
members and for legal and administrative costs associated with the settlement
amounted to $172.8 million and $496.6 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Given the uncertainties associated with estimating the reserve, it
is reasonably possible that the final cost of the settlement could differ
materially from the amounts presently provided for by the Company. The Company
will continue to update its estimate of the final cost of the settlement as the
claims are processed and more specific information is developed, particularly as
the actual cost of the claims subject to alternative dispute resolution becomes
available. However, based on information available at this time, and the
uncertainties associated with the final claim processing and alternative dispute
resolution, the range of any additional costs related to the settlement cannot
be estimated with precision.
Through our group health insurance operations, which we sold in 1997, we
entered into a number of reinsurance arrangements in respect of personal
accident insurance and the occupational accident component of workers
compensation insurance, a portion of which was originated through a pool managed
by Unicover Managers, Inc. Under these arrangements, we both assumed risks as a
reinsurer, and also passed 95% of these risks on to other companies. This
business had originally been reinsured by a number of different companies, and
has become the subject of widespread disputes. During the fourth quarter of 1999
and early 2000, we received additional information about our exposure to losses
under the various reinsurance programs. As a result of this additional
information and in connection with global settlement discussions initiated in
late 1999 with other parties involved in the reinsurance programs, our present
best estimate of our remaining loss exposure to this issue is $133.7 million,
after-tax, which we recognized in 1999. The Company believes that any exposure
to loss from this issue, in addition to amounts already provided for as of
December 31, 2000, would not be material.
We had been subject to the surplus tax imposed on mutual life insurance
companies which disallows a portion of mutual life insurance company's
policyholder dividends as a deduction from taxable income. As a stock company,
we are no longer subject to surplus tax and have excluded the surplus tax from
segment after-tax operating income in all periods.
51
Amortization of Goodwill
The excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets of businesses
acquired was $228.6 million and $155.3 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Goodwill is amortized on systematic basis over periods not
exceeding 40 years, which correspond with the benefits estimated to be derived
from the acquisitions. Accumulated amortization was $63.6 million and $43.3
million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Amortization expense
included in other operating costs and expenses was $20.3 million, $9.7 million,
and $9.1 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Company reevaluates
the recoverability of recorded goodwill based on the undiscounted cash flows of
the related business whenever significant events or changes indicate an
impairment may exist. If the undiscounted cash flows do not support the amount
recorded, an impairment is recognized by a charge to current operations to
reduce the carrying value of the goodwill based on the expected discounted cash
flows of the related business. The following table shows the amount of goodwill
amortization for each applicable segment:
For the Year Ended December 31,
-------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----- ----- -----
(in millions)
Amortization of Goodwill:
Protection Segment ..................................... $ 3.8 $ -- $ --
Asset Gathering Segment ................................ 6.8 6.8 6.5
----- ----- -----
Total Retail ........................................ 10.6 6.8 6.5
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment ... -- -- --
Investment Management Segment .......................... 1.1 1.1 1.1
----- ----- -----
Total Institutional ................................. 1.1 1.1 1.1
Corporate and Other Segment ............................ 8.6 1.8 1.5
----- ----- -----
Total goodwill amortization expense .................... $20.3 $ 9.7 $ 9.1
===== ===== =====
Segment Allocations
We allocate surplus to the segments in amounts sufficient to support the
associated liabilities of each segment and to maintain capital levels consistent
with the overall business segment and corporate strategies. Allocations of net
investment income are based on the amount of assets owned by each segment. Other
costs and operating expenses are allocated to each segment based on a review of
the nature of such costs, cost allocations utilizing time studies, and other
allocation methodologies.
52
Retail-Protection Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to
the Protection Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Year Ended
December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Premiums ............................................. $1,295.6 $1,291.0 $1,262.5
Universal life and investment-type product
charges ............................................ 388.3 361.1 333.3
Net investment income (1) ............................ 1,196.4 1,101.9 1,061.2
Other revenue ........................................ (7.1) 2.9 10.6
-------- -------- --------
Total revenues (1) ................................. 2,873.2 2,756.9 2,667.6
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders ........................... 1,503.5 1,595.0 1,424.4
Other operating costs and expenses .................. 383.8 381.0 418.3
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs, excluding amounts related to net realized
investment gains ................................... 132.0 69.2 165.4
Dividends to policyholders ............................ 475.6 452.0 422.8
-------- -------- --------
Total benefits and expenses ........................ 2,494.9 2,497.2 2,430.9
Segment pre-tax operating income (2) ................... 378.3 259.7 236.7
Income taxes ........................................... 126.1 71.0 70.6
-------- -------- --------
Segment after-tax operating income (2) ................ 252.2 188.7 166.1
After-tax adjustments:(2)
Realized investment (losses) gains, net ............. (11.5) 108.6 49.0
Restructuring charges ............................... (6.7) (8.6) --
Demutualization expenses ............................ 1.6 (61.3) (7.9)
Other demutualization related costs ................. (6.8) (4.6) --
Surplus tax ......................................... 20.8 (12.5) 11.7
-------- -------- --------
Total after-tax adjustments ....................... (2.6) 21.6 52.8
-------- -------- --------
GAAP Reported:
Net income ............................................. $ 249.6 $ 210.3 $ 218.9
======== ======== ========
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax ................... 2.2 -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net income before amortization of goodwill ............. $ 251.8 $ 210.3 $ 218.9
======== ======== ========
53
For the Year Ended
December 31,
-------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Other Data:
Segment after-tax operating income (loss)
Non-traditional life (variable life and universal
life) ............................................. $ 97.0 $ 92.8 $ 74.6
Traditional life ..................................... 110.5 68.2 73.0
Individual long-term care ............................ 39.9 19.6 13.4
Group long-term care ................................. 6.7 7.0 4.6
Other ................................................ (1.9) 1.1 0.5
Statutory premiums (3)
Variable life ........................................ $ 922.0 $ 829.8 $ 810.8
Universal life (4) ................................... 173.5 117.9 436.8
Traditional life ..................................... 965.5 1,043.6 1,051.3
Individual long-term care ............................ 276.7 195.3 171.3
Group long-term care ................................. 14.7 18.9 31.0
(1) The consolidated statement of income includes in revenues the contribution
from the closed block of $124.1 million for the period ended December 31,
2000. The contribution from the closed block includes closed block revenues
of $1,467.7 million and closed block benefits and expenses of $1,343.6
million for the period ended December 31, 2000. For purposes of this
Management's Discussion and Analysis the impact of the closed block is
represented within each line of operations of the Protection Segment. For
details of closed block activity as of and for the period ended December
31, 2000 see Note 6 -- Closed Block to the audited consolidated financial
statements as of the same time period.
(2) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this Management's
Discussion and Analysis.
(3) Statutory data have been derived from the annual statements of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company (formerly John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Company), John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and Investors
Partner Life (formerly John Hancock Life Insurance Company of America) as
filed with insurance regulatory authorities and prepared in accordance with
statutory accounting practices.
(4) Includes bank owned life insurance premiums of $340.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 1998, respectively. There were no bank owned life
insurance premiums for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 2000,
respectively.
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999
Segment after-tax operating income was $252.2 million in 2000, an increase
of $63.5 million, or 33.6%, from $188.7 million in 1999. Non-traditional life
insurance segment after-tax operating income increased $4.2 million, or 4.5%,
primarily due to an increase in net investment income resulting from higher
yields on higher net average invested assets. Traditional life insurance segment
after-tax operating income increased $42.3 million, or 62.0%, primarily
resulting from higher net investment income due to higher portfolio rates, lower
operating expenses, and not repeating a $29.3 million charge, net of deferred
acquisition costs, taken in 1999 for previously unreported claims associated
with the demutualization. Individual long-term care insurance segment after-tax
operating income increased $20.3 million, or 103.6%, resulting from an increase
in net investment income due to the addition of the Fortis business and growth
in average net invested assets. Group long-term care insurance segment after-tax
operating income decreased by $0.3 million, or 4.3%.
Total revenues were $2,873.2 million in 2000, an increase of $116.3
million, or 4.2%, from $2,756.9 million in 1999. Premiums increased $4.6
million, or 1.0%, primarily due to an increase in individual long-term care
insurance premiums from both additional premiums assumed relating to the
acquisition of Fortis and continued growth in the business. Partially offsetting
this increase was a decline in traditional life insurance premiums. Universal
life and investment-type product charges consist primarily of cost of insurance
fees and separate account fees and were $388.3 million in 2000, an increase of
54
$27.2 million, or 7.5%, from $361.1 million in 1999. The increase was primarily
due to growth in average account values. Net investment income increased $94.5
million, or 8.6%, primarily due to increases in average net invested assets and
portfolio yields.
Total benefits and expenses were $2,494.9 million in 2000, an decrease of
$2.3 million, or 0.1%, from $2,497.3 million in 1999. Benefits to policyholders
decreased $91.5 million, or 5.7%, due to several offsetting items, including a
decrease of $193.8 million in benefits to policyholders on traditional life
insurance products due to improved mortality, and not repeating the prior year
$62.0 million higher benefits to policyholders for previously unreported death
claims identified as part of the demutualization. Offsetting this decrease was
an increase in benefits to policyholders in the individual long-term care
insurance business due to both the acquisition of Fortis and growth in the
business. Other increases in benefits to policyholders included a $20.7 million
increase on non-traditional life insurance products and an increase in group
long-term care insurance. Other operating costs and expenses increased $2.8
million, or 1.0%, to $383.8 million in 2000 from $381.0 million in 1999,
primarily due to an increase of $13.5 million in operating expenses associated
with the individual long-term care business due to the acquisition of Fortis and
growth in the business. Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs of
$132.0 million in 2000 increased $62.8 million, or 90.7%, from $69.2 million in
1999. The increase resulted from lower amortization of deferred acquisition
costs in the prior year for Traditional life products due to revised projections
of estimated gross profits based on the recording of additional unreported
claims to the demutualization. In addition, amortization expense on
Non-Traditional life products increased due to revised projections of estimated
gross profits based upon changes in estimated future interest margins. Dividends
to policyholders increased $23.6 million, or 5.2%, primarily due to aging of the
in-force business on traditional life insurance products. The segment's
effective tax rate increased to 33.3% in 2000 from 27.3% in 1999, primarily due
to the transfer of tax-preferenced assets to the Corporate and Other Segment in
the fourth quarter of 1999.
Amortization of goodwill in 2000 relates to the acquisition of the
individual long-term care business from Fortis.
55
Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998
Segment after-tax operating income was $188.7 million in 1999, an increase
of $22.6 million, or 13.6%, from $166.1 million in 1998. Non-traditional life
insurance segment after-tax operating income increased $18.2 million, or 24.4%,
primarily due to an increase in universal life and investment-type product
charges due to growth in variable life insurance in-force. Traditional life
insurance segment after-tax operating income decreased $4.8 million, or 6.6%,
primarily resulting from higher death benefits and a $29.3 million charge net of
deferred acquisition costs for the incurred but not reported reserve associated
with the demutualization, partially offset by a decrease in interest expense on
prior year taxes. Individual long-term care insurance segment after-tax
operating income increased $6.2 million, or 46.3%, primarily due to higher net
investment income resulting from an increase in invested assets, partially
offset by unfavorable persistency. Group long-term care insurance segment
after-tax operating income increased by $2.4 million, or 52.2%.
Total revenues were $2,756.9 million in 1999, an increase of $89.3 million,
or 3.3%, from $2,667.6 million in 1998. Premiums increased $28.5 million, or
2.2%, primarily due to an increase in individual long-term care insurance
premiums. Universal life and investment-type product charges consist primarily
of cost of insurance fees and separate account fees and were $361.1 million in
1999, an increase of $27.8 million, or 8.3%, from $333.3 million in 1998. The
increase was primarily due to higher cost of insurance fees resulting from
growth in the average amount of variable life insurance in-force, which
increased 10.7% to $54,622.0 million in 1999 from $49,364.1 million in 1998. Net
investment income increased $40.7 million, or 3.8%, primarily due to an increase
in the segment's average invested assets and lower investment expenses.
Total benefits and expenses were $2,497.2 million in 1999, an increase of
$66.3 million, or 2.7%, from $2,430.9 million in 1998. Benefits to policyholders
increased $170.6 million, or 12.0%, primarily due to a $140.7 million increase
in benefits on traditional life insurance products due to higher death benefits,
including $61.7 million of benefits from previously unreported deaths identified
as a result of the policyholder demutualization mailing, and a $63.2 million
increase in benefits on individual long-term care insurance products, due to
higher sales. Other operating costs and expenses decreased $37.3 million, or
8.9%, to $381.0 million in 1999 from $418.3 million in 1998, primarily due to a
decrease in interest expense on prior year taxes. Amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs of $69.2 million in 1999 decreased $96.2 million, or
58.2%, from $165.4 million in 1998. The decrease was primarily due to lower
amortization expense on non-traditional life insurance products resulting from
revised projections of estimated gross profits based upon increases in estimated
future interest margins and mortality margins. In addition, amortization expense
on traditional life insurance products decreased due to lower profits, primarily
resulting from $61.7 million of previously unreported death claims identified as
a result of the policyholder demutualization mailing. Dividends to policyholders
increased $29.2 million, or 6.9%, primarily due to normal growth of dividends on
traditional life insurance products. The segment's effective tax rate declined
to 27.3% in 1999 from 29.8% in 1998, due to non-deductible losses in 1998.
56
Retail-Asset Gathering Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the
Asset Gathering Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Premiums ............................................ $ 63.4 $ 17.2 $ 19.8
Investment-type product charges ..................... 138.3 120.6 99.9
Net investment income ............................... 445.8 388.6 378.0
Investment management revenues, commissions, and
other fees ......................................... 547.1 528.8 516.8
Other revenue ....................................... 1.3 2.1 0.8
-------- -------- --------
Total revenues .................................... 1,195.9 1,057.3 1,015.3
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders ........................... 371.3 299.3 296.3
Other operating costs and expenses .................. 552.9 529.3 504.9
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs, excluding amounts related to
net realized investment gains ..................... 78.8 53.4 46.8
Dividends to policyholders .......................... 0.1 0.1 0.1
-------- -------- --------
Total benefits and expenses ....................... 1,003.1 882.1 848.1
Segment pre-tax operating income (1) .................. 192.8 175.2 167.2
Income taxes .......................................... 64.0 60.1 56.1
-------- -------- --------
Segment after-tax operating income (1) ................ 128.8 115.1 111.1
After-tax adjustments (1):
Realized investment gains (losses), net ............. 18.6 (6.9) 12.0
Restructuring charges ............................... (1.4) (7.3) --
Demutualization expenses ............................ 0.4 (13.0) (1.8)
Other demutualization related costs ................. (1.3) (0.9) --
Surplus tax ......................................... 0.6 (1.0) 0.3
-------- -------- --------
Total after-tax adjustments ...................... 16.9 (29.1) 10.5
-------- -------- --------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect
of accounting change ............................. 145.7 86.0 121.6
Cumulative effect of accounting change .............. -- (9.6) --
-------- -------- --------
Net income ............................................ $ 145.7 $ 76.4 $ 121.6
======== ======== ========
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax .................. 4.5 4.4 4.2
-------- -------- --------
Net income before amortization of goodwill ............ $ 150.5 $ 80.8 $ 125.8
======== ======== ========
57
For the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Other Data:
Segment after-tax operating income
Annuity ........................................ $ 87.5 $ 67.0 $ 53.2
Mutual funds ................................... 46.3 46.9 57.0
Other .......................................... (5.0) 1.2 0.9
Annuity premiums and deposits (2)
Fixed .......................................... $ 854.3 $ 648.6 $ 360.6
Variable ....................................... 1,145.8 847.7 882.7
Mutual fund assets under management, end of year ... $31,725.8 $32,696.6 $34,945.2
- ----------
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this Management's
Discussion and Analysis.
(2) Statutory data have been derived from the annual statements of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company and John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company, as
filed with insurance regulatory authorities and prepared in accordance with
statutory accounting practices.
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999
Segment after-tax operating income was $128.8 million in 2000, an increase
of $13.7 million, or 11.9%, from $115.1 million in 1999. Annuity segment
after-tax operating income increased $20.5 million, or 30.6%, primarily due to
an increase in investment spread and higher invested assets on fixed annuity
products, partially offset by a decrease in after-tax operating income in the
variable annuity business. Spreads increased 22 basis points to 2.28% for the
year ended December 31, 2000. Mutual fund segment after-tax operating income
decreased $0.6 million, or 1.3%, primarily due to an increase in operating
expenses, partially offset by a 1.0% increase in management advisory fees.
Total revenues increased $138.6 million, or 1.3%, to $1,195.9 million in
2000 from $1,057.3 million in 1999. Premiums increased $46.2 million, or 268.6%,
due to increased sales of immediate fixed annuities with life contingencies.
Investment-type product charges increased $17.7 million, or 14.7%, due to growth
in average variable annuity liabilities, which increased 3.6% from 1999 and
increased fees earned on surrenders. Mortality and expense fees as a percentage
of average account balances increased 6 basis points in 2000. Net investment
income increased $57.2 million, or 14.7%, primarily due to a higher level of
invested assets backing fixed annuity products, and an increase in the average
investment yield on invested assets backing fixed annuity products. The average
investment yield on invested assets backing fixed annuity products increased 43
basis points from 1999, reflecting higher market interest rates on new fixed
income investments.
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees increased $18.3
million, or 3.5%, to $547.1 million in 2000 from $528.8 million in 1999. Average
mutual fund assets under management decreased $742.8 million, or 2.2%, to
$32,605.2 million in 2000 from $33,348.0 million in 1999, primarily due to
market depreciation of $476.4 million and fees in 2000. During 2000 sales
increased $1,561.1 million and redemptions decreased $1,489.0 million compared
to the prior year. The result was net redemptions of $45.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2000 compared to net redemptions of $3,095.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 1999, an improvement of $3,050.1 million. The
improvement in sales and redemptions is primarily due to the aggressive
marketing of both retail and institutional investment management services in
addition to the launch of a multi-sector fund in September 2000 and lower
redemptions in the financial sector funds and private managed accounts from the
prior year. Investment advisory fees decreased $6.4 million, or 3.1%, to $193.9
million in 2000 and were 0.59% and 0.61% of average mutual fund assets under
management for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The
decline in the investment advisory fee rate occurred primarily because fixed
income assets, which bear a lower advisory fee than equity assets, increased as
a percentage of total assets. Underwriting and distribution fees increased $25.7
million, or 9.2%, to $304.6 million in 2000 primarily due to the increase in
front-end load mutual fund sales, and accordingly, commission revenue. The
increase in front-end load charges was partially offset by a decrease in
deferred
58
sales charges due to improved retention of existing accounts. Shareholder
service and other fees were $48.6 million in 2000 compared to $49.6 million in
1999, primarily reflecting lower assets under management.
Total benefits and expenses increased $121.0 million, or 13.7%, to $1,003.1
million in 2000 from $882.1 million in 1999. Benefits to policyholders increased
$72.0 million, or 24.1%, primarily due to an increase in benefits paid on
immediate annuities and interest credited on fixed annuity account balances. The
increase in benefits paid on immediate annuities is the result of increased
premiums in this business. Premiums on immediate annuities increased $45.0
million, or 316.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2000. Interest credited on
fixed annuity account balances increased primarily due to higher average fixed
annuity account balances of $5,211.6 million in 2000, as compared to $4,862.2
million in 1999. In addition to the increase in average fixed annuity account
balances, the average interest credited rate on fixed annuity account balances
increased to 5.83% in 2000 from 5.59% in 1999. The average interest credited
rate pattern is dependent upon the general trend of market interest rates,
frequency of credited rate resets and business mix. Deferred fixed annuities'
interest credited rates generally are reset annually on the policy anniversary.
Other operating costs and expenses increased $23.6 million, or 4.5%, to $552.9
million in 2000 from $529.3 million in 1999. The increase was primarily due to
an increase in the commission fees incurred in the mutual funds business,
primarily the result of increased front-end load charge mutual fund sales. In
addition, other operating costs and expenses increased due to increased
commission expense in Signator, partially offset by a decrease in the annuities
business. The increase in other operating costs were partially offset by
additional deferrals of acquisition expenses in the annuities business.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased $25.4 million, or
47.6%, to $78.8 million in 2000 from $53.4 million in 1999, primarily due to
poor separate account performance and increased surrenders in the variable
annuities business which accelerated current amortization. The segment's
effective tax rate was 33.2% and 34.3% in 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Amortization of goodwill increased $0.1 million in 2000 as compared to
1999. No new acquisitions were entered into by the Asset Gathering Segment in
2000.
Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998
Segment after-tax operating income was $115.1 million in 1999, an increase
of $4.0 million, or 3.6%, from $111.1 million in 1998. Annuity segment after-tax
operating income increased $13.8 million, or 25.9%, primarily due to an increase
in variable annuity product charges, resulting from higher average account
balances, and higher investment spread on fixed annuity products, primarily
resulting from a decline in the average interest credited rate. Mutual fund
segment after-tax operating income decreased $10.1 million, or 17.7%, primarily
due to lower advisory fees as a result of lower assets under management and
exiting the New Mexico Capital Management business, partially offset by a
decline in operating expenses.
Total revenues increased $42.0 million, or 4.1%, to $1,057.3 million in
1999 from $1,015.3 million in 1998. Premiums decreased $2.6 million, or 13.1%,
due to lower sales of immediate fixed annuities with life contingencies.
Investment-type product charges increased $20.7 million, or 20.7%, due to growth
in average variable annuity separate account liabilities, which increased 21.3%
to $6,955.7 million in 1999 from $5,736.0 million in 1998. Mortality and expense
fees as a percentage of average account balances were 1.41% and 1.37% for the
years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Net investment income
increased $10.6 million or 2.8%, primarily due to a higher level of invested
assets backing fixed annuity products, partially offset by a decrease in the
average investment yield on invested assets backing fixed annuity products. The
average investment yield on invested assets backing fixed annuity products was
7.77% in 1999 compared to 7.91% in 1998, reflecting lower market interest rates
on new fixed income investments.
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees increased $12.0
million, or 2.3%, to $528.8 million in 1999 from $516.8 million in 1998. Average
mutual fund assets under management decreased $882.0 million, or 2.6%, to
$33,348.0 million in 1999 from $34,230.0 million in 1998, primarily due to net
redemptions of $3,095.6 million in 1999 compared to net sales of $3,107.2
million in 1998. Investment advisory fees decreased $8.1 million, or 3.9%, to
$200.3 million in 1999 and were .60% and .62% of average mutual fund assets
under management for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
The decline in the investment advisory fee rate occurred primarily because fixed
income assets, which bear a lower advisory fee than equity assets, increased as
a percentage of total assets. Underwriting and distribution fees increased $12.2
million, or 4.6%, to $278.9 million in 1999 primarily due to our acquisition of
the Essex Corporation, a distributor of annuities and mutual funds through
banks, in January 1999. Shareholder service and other fees were $49.6
59
million in 1999 compared to $41.7 million in 1998, primarily reflecting the
increase in average number of customer accounts.
Total benefits and expenses increased $34.0 million, or 4.0%, to $882.1
million in 1999 from $848.1 million in 1998. Benefits to policyholders increased
$3.0 million, or 1.0%, primarily due to an increase in interest credited on
fixed annuity account balances. Interest credited on fixed annuity account
balances increased primarily due to higher average fixed annuity account
balances of $4,862.2 million in 1999, as compared to $4,673.2 million in 1998.
The increase in average fixed annuity account balances was partially offset by a
decline in the average interest credited rate on fixed annuity account balances
to 5.59% in 1999 from 5.96% in 1998. The average interest credited rate pattern
is dependent upon the general trend of market interest rates, frequency of
credited rate resets and business mix. Deferred fixed annuities' interest
credited rates generally are reset annually on the policy anniversary. Other
operating costs and expenses increased $24.4 million, or 4.8%, to $529.3 million
in 1999 from $504.9 million in 1998. The increase was primarily due to our
acquisition of the Essex Corporation and higher amortization of mutual fund
deferred selling commissions, resulting from higher redemptions in 1999. These
increases were partially offset by a decrease in operating expenses related to
our mutual fund operations and annuities operations. Amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs increased $6.6 million, or 14.1%, to $53.4 million in
1999 from $46.8 million in 1998, primarily due to higher profits. The segment's
effective tax rate was 34.3% and 33.6% in 1999 and 1998, respectively.
Amortization of goodwill increased $0.2 million in 1999 as compared to 1998
due to the acquisition of the Essex Corporation in 1999.
60
Institutional-Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the
Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Premiums ............................................. $ 620.3 $ 298.2 $ 121.4
Investment-type product charges ...................... 64.7 79.3 71.4
Net investment income ................................ 1,741.9 1,681.3 1,576.3
Realized investment losses, net (1) .................. -- (31.2) (37.7)
Other expense ........................................ (17.5) (5.8) (0.2)
-------- -------- --------
Total revenues ..................................... 2,409.4 2,021.8 1,731.2
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders, excluding amounts
related to net realized investment gains credited
to participating pension contractholders ............ 1,972.4 1,614.4 1,411.5
Other operating costs and expenses ................... 70.8 85.6 92.6
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs .................................. 2.6 3.1 3.7
Dividends to policyholders ........................... 43.5 25.9 20.8
-------- -------- --------
Total benefits and expenses ........................ 2,089.3 1,729.0 1,528.6
Segment pre-tax operating income (1) ................... 320.1 292.8 202.6
Income taxes ........................................... 108.5 91.1 56.9
-------- -------- --------
Segment after-tax operating income (1) ................. 211.6 201.7 145.7
After-tax adjustments: (1)
Realized investment (losses) gains, net .............. (40.5) 58.4 17.2
Restructuring charges ................................ (2.6) (0.6) --
Corporate account asset transfer ..................... 5.7 (205.8) --
Demutualization expenses ............................. 0.4 (16.1) (1.5)
Other demutualization related costs .................. (1.7) (1.1) --
Surplus tax .......................................... 6.5 (6.5) 2.0
-------- -------- --------
Total after-tax adjustments ....................... (32.2) (171.7) 17.7
-------- -------- --------
GAAP Reported:
Net income ............................................. $ 179.4 $ 30.0 $ 163.4
======== ======== ========
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax ................... -- -- --
-------- -------- --------
Net income before amortization
of goodwill ............................................ $ 179.4 $ 30.0 $ 163.4
======== ======== ========
61
For the Year Ended December 31,
------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Other Data:
Segment after-tax operating income
Spread-based products
GIC's and funding agreements ...... $ 133.1 $ 131.5 $ 83.7
Single premium annuities .......... 45.2 32.9 33.8
Fee-based products ................... 33.3 37.3 28.2
Statutory premiums and deposits (2)
Spread-based products
GICs and funding agreements ........ 4,442.0 5,217.4 4,995.0
Single premium annuities ........... 594.7 282.4 111.8
Fee-based products
Participating contracts and
conversion annuity contracts ... 467.0 527.9 566.7
Separate account GICs .............. 50.3 615.7 459.9
Other separate account contracts ... 242.6 272.7 145.6
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this Management's
Discussion and Analysis.
(2) Statutory data has been derived from the annual statements, as filed with
insurance regulatory authorities and prepared in accordance with statutory
accounting practices.
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999
Segment after-tax operating income was $211.6 million in 2000, an increase
of $9.9 million, or 4.9% from $201.7 million in 1999. Spread-based products'
segment after-tax operating income increased $13.9 million, or 8.5%, to $178.3
million primarily due to higher investment spread as a result of an increase in
average invested assets backing spread-based products. Fee-based products'
segment after-tax operating income decreased $4.0 million, or 10.7%, to $37.3
million in 2000 from $37.7 million in 1999 primarily due to lower separate
account GIC fees partially offset by increased gains from non-participating
annuities.
Total revenues increased $387.6 million, or 19.2%, to $2,409.4 million in
2000 from $2,021.8 million in 1999, primarily due to a $322.1 million increase
in premiums. During 2000, we sold two significant single premium annuity
contracts during the period. Investment-type product charges were $64.7 million
for 2000, a decrease of $14.6 million, or 18.4%, primarily due to lower general
account expense recoveries and slower separate account GIC sales in the current
year. Investment-type product charges were 0.56% and 0.65% of average fee-based
policy reserves in 2000 and 1999, respectively. The decrease primarily reflects
lower expense charges on participating contracts and the impact of slower sales
in the current year. Net investment income increased $60.6 million, or 3.6%, to
$1,741.9 million in 2000 compared to $1,681.3 million in 1999, primarily as a
result of a higher yield on average invested assets backing spread-based
products. Average invested assets backing spread-based products decreased $196.5
million, or 1.2%, to $16,879.8 million in 2000 from $17,076.3 million in 1999
reflecting the termination of the short-term funding agreements in 1999, largely
offset by asset growth in 2000. The average investment yield on these invested
assets increased to 8.64% in 2000 compared to 8.10% in 1999, reflecting the
reinvestment of proceeds from lower-yielding assets into relatively
higher-yielding securities. Realized investment losses associated with the
termination of the short-term funding agreement business in 1999 were not
repeated in 2000.
62
Total benefits and expenses increased $360.3 million, or 20.8%, to $2,089.3
million in 2000 from $1,729.0 million in 1999. The increase was primarily due to
a $358.0 million increase in benefits to policyholders as a result of increased
sales of single premium annuity contracts. Benefits to policyholders also
includes interest credited on account balances for spread-based products, which
was $1,165.1 million in 2000, an increase of $46.8 million, or 4.2%, from
$1,118.3 million in 1999. Excluding interest credited in 1999 on short-term
funding agreements that were terminated in that year, the interest credited for
spread-based products increased $99.5 million, or 9.4%. The increase was
primarily due to an increase in average account balances for spread-based
products of $810.9 million, excluding short-term funding agreement balances from
1999, to $16,185.2 million in 2000 from $15,374.4 million in 1999 and an
increase in the average interest credited rate on account balances for
spread-based products, which was 7.18% in 2000 compared to 6.81% in 1999. The
increase in the average interest credited rate on account balances for
spread-based products was primarily due to the sale of GICs and funding
agreements with higher average interest credited rates. Other operating costs
and expenses were $70.8 million in 2000, a decrease of $14.8 million, or 17.3%,
from $85.6 million in 1999. The decrease was primarily due to lower deficiency
interest charges. Dividends of $43.5 million in 2000, increased $17.6 million,
or 68.0%, from $25.9 million in 1999, reflecting higher earnings on
participating contractholders' accounts. The segment's effective tax rate was
33.9% in 2000, as compared to 31.1% in 1999.
Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998
Segment after-tax operating income was $201.7 million in 1999, an increase
of $56.0 million, or 38.4%, from $145.7 million in 1998. Spread-based products
segment after-tax operating income increased $46.9 million, or 39.9%, primarily
due to higher investment spread as a result of an increase in average invested
assets backing spread-based products and the receipt of $14.7 million of
interest on a defaulted fixed maturity investment. Fee-based products' segment
after-tax operating income increased $9.1 million to $37.3 million in 1999 from
$28.2 million in 1998 primarily due to an increase in separate account GIC fees
and lower operating expenses.
Total revenues increased $290.6 million, or 16.8%, to $2,021.8 million in
1999 from $1,731.2 million in 1998, primarily due to a $176.8 million increase
in premiums. During the second quarter of 1999, we sold a significant single
premium annuity contract which drove the increase in premiums. Investment-type
product charges were $79.3 million for 1999, an increase of $7.9 million, or
11.0%, primarily due to higher sales of single premium annuity contracts and
higher product charges from separate account GICs due to higher average account
balances resulting from sales. Investment-type product charges were .65% and
.59% of average fee-based policy reserves in 1999 and 1998, respectively. The
increase primarily reflects higher expense charges on participating contracts
and the recognition of fee income upon the sale of single premium annuity
contracts and separate account GICs. Net investment income increased $105.0
million, or 6.7%, in 1999 compared to 1998, primarily as a result of a higher
level of average invested assets backing spread-based products. Average invested
assets backing spread-based products increased $1,924.5 million, or 12.7%, to
$17,076.3 million in 1999 from $15,151.8 million in 1998. The average investment
yield on these invested assets declined to 8.10% in 1999 compared to 8.18% in
1998, reflecting the reinvestment of proceeds from higher-yielding fixed
maturities into relatively lower-yielding securities. Realized investment losses
associated with our short-term funding agreements, which were terminated in
1999, improved $6.5 million in 1999 primarily due to a narrowing of interest
rate spreads on mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds relative to U.S.
Treasury securities, resulting in higher prices upon the sale of the securities
in 1999 as compared to 1998.
Total benefits and expenses increased $200.4 million, or 13.1%, to $1,729.0
million in 1999 from $1,528.6 million in 1998. The increase was primarily due to
a $202.9 million increase in benefits to policyholders as a result of increased
sales of single premium annuity contracts. Benefits to policyholders also
includes interest credited on account balances for spread-based products, which
was $1,118.3 million in 1999, an increase of $69.2 million, or 6.6%, from
$1,049.1 million in 1998. The increase was primarily due to an increase in
average account balances for spread-based products of $1,356.7 million to
$16,429.1 million in 1999 from $15,072.4 million in 1998 partially offset by a
decline in the average interest credited rate on account balances for
spread-based products, which was 6.81% in 1999 compared to 7.21% in 1998. The
decline in the average interest credited rate on account balances for
spread-based products was primarily due to sales of GICs and funding agreements
with lower average interest credited rates. Other operating costs and expenses
were $85.6 million in 1999, a decrease of $7.0 million, or 7.6%, from $92.6
million in 1998. The decrease was primarily due to lower guaranty fund
assessments. Dividends of $25.9 million in 1999, increased $5.1 million, or
24.5%, from $20.8 million for 1998, reflecting higher earnings on participating
contractholders' accounts. The segment's effective tax rate was 31.1% in 1999,
as compared to 28.1% in 1998.
63
Institutional-Investment Management Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the
Investment Management Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Year Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Revenues
Net investment income ........................... $ 22.7 $ 45.9 $ 24.1
Realized investment gains (losses), net (1) ..... 3.2 3.5 (4.4)
Investment management revenues,
commissions, and other fees .................. 186.1 140.2 123.8
Other revenue ................................... -- 0.3 0.4
--------- --------- ---------
Total revenues ............................... 212.0 189.9 143.9
Benefits and expenses
Other operating costs and expenses .............. 132.7 127.2 117.8
--------- --------- ---------
Total benefits and expenses ..................... 132.7 127.2 117.8
Segment pre-tax operating income (1) .............. 79.3 62.7 26.1
Income taxes ...................................... 32.5 25.4 10.7
--------- --------- ---------
Segment after-tax operating income (1) ............ 46.8 37.3 15.4
After-tax adjustments: (1)
Realized investment gains, net ................. 4.4 2.0 0.1
--------- --------- ---------
GAAP Reported:
Income before cumulative effect of accounting
change ........................................ 51.2 39.3 15.5
Cumulative effect of accounting change ......... -- (0.1) --
--------- --------- ---------
Net income ........................................ $ 51.2 $ 39.2 $ 15.5
========= ========= =========
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax .............. 0.8 0.7 0.7
--------- --------- ---------
Net Income before amortization of goodwill ........ $ 52.0 $ 39.9 $ 16.2
========= ========= =========
Other Data:
Assets under management, end of year (2) .......... $32,651.6 $40,211.7 $39,637.7
========= ========= =========
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this Management's
Discussion and Analysis.
(2) Includes general account cash and invested assets of $106.9 million, $164.5
million, and $88.1 million as of December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998,
respectively.
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999
Segment after-tax operating income was $46.8 million in 2000, an increase
of $9.5 million, or 25.5%, from $37.3 million in 1999. The increase was
primarily due to higher investment advisory fees.
64
Total revenues increased $22.1 million, or 11.6%, to $212.0 million in 2000
from $189.9 million in 1999. Net investment income was $22.7 million in 2000, a
decrease of $23.2 million from $45.9 million for 1999. The decrease in net
investment income was partially due to the purchased equity interest in
collateralized bond obligations by other business segments of $31.7 million.
Offsetting this decrease was a $7.8 million increase in interest income on
mortgage loans held for sale. Investment management revenues, commissions, and
other fees increased $45.9 million, or 32.7% in 2000, due primarily to an
increase investment advisory fees, which increased $47.0 million to $180.6
million compared to $133.6 million reported in 1999. The increase in investment
advisory fees was primarily due to the $45.3 million in incentive fee receipts
in connection with the restructuring of timber management contracts and $15.3
million in performance fees earned by the mezzanine fund manager. Investment
advisory fees were .50% and .34% of average advisory assets under management in
2000 and 1999, respectively. Mortgage origination and servicing fees were $5.4
million compared to $6.6 million in 1999. Realized investment gains decreased
$0.3 million due to lower securitization activity in 2000.
Other operating costs and expenses were $132.7 million in 2000, an increase
of $5.5 million, or 4.3%, from $127.2 million in 1999. The increase was
primarily due to $15.7 million in incentive compensation payments related to the
receipt of incentive fees on timber management contracts and $9.1 million in
performance fees paid for the management of the mezzanine fund. Offsetting these
increases was a $19.8 million transfer of expenses on equity interest in
collateralized bond obligations to the other business segments owning these
assets. The segment's effective tax rate on operating income was 41.0% in 2000
and 1999. The effective tax rate for the Investment Management Segment is higher
than our other business segments due to the state tax on certain subsidiaries.
Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998
Segment after-tax operating income was $37.3 million in 1999, an increase
of $21.9 million, or 142.2%, from $15.4 million in 1998. The increase was
primarily due to higher investment advisory fees resulting from an increase in
average assets under management and higher realized investment gains on sales of
mortgage loans.
Total revenues increased $46.0 million, or 32.0%, to $189.9 million in 1999
from $143.9 million in 1998. Net investment income was $45.9 million in 1999, an
increase of $21.8 million from $24.1 million for 1998. The increase in net
investment income was due to a higher level of average invested assets due to
the formation of a collateralized bond obligation in the fourth quarter of 1998.
Investment management revenues, commissions, and other fees increased $16.4
million, or 13.2%, in 1999, primarily due to an increase in investment advisory
fees, which increased $18.3 million to $133.6 million in 1999 compared to $115.3
million in 1998. The increase in investment advisory fees was primarily due to a
higher level of average assets under management, which increased $4,824.5
million, or 13.5%, to $40,554.7 million in 1999 from $35,730.2 million in 1998.
Investment advisory fees were .33% and .32% of average advisory assets under
management in 1999 and 1998, respectively. This increase primarily reflects the
receipt of a fee in connection with the termination of a timber management
contract. Mortgage origination and servicing fees were $6.6 million in 1999
compared to $8.5 million in 1998. Realized investment gains increased $7.9
million in 1999 primarily due to a narrowing of interest rate spreads in 1999,
as compared to 1998, on mortgage loans held for sale.
Other operating costs and expenses were $127.2 million in 1999, an increase
of $9.4 million, or 8.0%, from $117.8 million in 1998. The increase was
primarily due to a $6.7 million increase in interest expense in connection with
our collateralized bond obligation. Other operating costs and expenses were
0.22% and 0.24% of average advisory assets under management in 1999 and 1998,
respectively. The segment's effective tax rate was 41.0% in 1999 and 1998.
65
Corporate and Other Segment
The following table presents certain summary financial data relating to the
Corporate and Other Segment for the periods indicated.
For the Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in millions)
Operating Results:
Segment after-tax operating income (loss): (1)
International insurance operations ................. $ 32.2 $ 26.0 $ 25.3
Corporate operations ............................... 64.2 31.2 8.7
Non-core businesses ................................ 7.6 10.6 22.3
------- ------- -------
Total ............................................ 104.0 67.8 56.3
After-tax adjustments (1):
Realized investment gains (losses), net ............ 93.5 (42.1) 15.4
Class action lawsuit ............................... -- (91.1) (150.0)
Restructuring charges .............................. (1.3) (0.5) --
Demutualization expenses ........................... 0.1 (3.2) (0.5)
Other demutualization related costs ................ (0.2) (0.2) --
Workers' compensation reinsurance reserve .......... -- (133.7) --
Surplus tax ........................................ 18.1 (2.2) 1.5
------- ------- -------
Total after-tax adjustments ..................... 110.2 (273.0) (133.6)
------- ------- -------
GAAP Reported:
Net income (loss) .................................... $ 214.2 $(205.2) $ (77.3)
======= ======= =======
Amortization of goodwill, net of tax ................. 8.6 1.2 0.9
------- ------- -------
Net income (loss) before amortization
of goodwill .......................................... $ 222.8 $(204.0) $ (76.4)
======= ======= =======
(1) See "Adjustments to GAAP Reported Net Income" included in this Management's
Discussion and Analysis.
Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999
Segment after-tax operating income from international insurance operations
was $32.2 million for 2000, an increase of $6.2 million from $26.0 million for
1999. On October 1, 1999, The Maritime Life Assurance Company (Maritime), our
Canadian subsidiary, purchased Aetna Holdings Canada Limited (Aetna).
Accordingly, Aetna's results of operations are included with Maritime's from the
date of the acquisition. The increase in segment after-tax operating income
primarily resulted from the inclusion of Aetna's operations for a full year in
2000 compared to one quarter in 1999.
66
Segment after-tax operating income from corporate operations was $64.2
million in 2000, an increase of $33.0 million from $31.2 million in 1999. During
the fourth quarter of 1999, a corporate account was formed and all corporate
type assets, including certain tax advantaged assets, were moved from the other
segments to the Corporate and Other Segment. Tax credits, associated with the
tax advantaged assets, were $15.9 million in 2000 and $0.5 million in 1999. In
addition, as part of this move, the group pension participating contractholders
were reimbursed at fair market value for these contracts. Because of this
transaction, in 2000 there was no longer a need to credit participating
policyholders with a share of the change in these assets which amounted to a
charge to this segment of $13.7 million for the first nine months of 1999.
Segment after-tax operating income from non-core businesses was $7.6
million in 2000, a decrease of $3.0 million from $10.6 million in 1999. The
decrease was due primarily to lower net investment income resulting from the
previously described disposals.
Amortization of goodwill increased $7.4 million in 2000, as compared to
1999, due to the acquisition of Aetna in the fourth quarter of 1999.
Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998
Segment after-tax operating income from international insurance operations
was $26.0 million for 1999, an increase of $0.7 million from $25.3 million for
1998. On October 1, 1999, The Maritime Life Assurance Company (Maritime), our
Canadian subsidiary, purchased Aetna Holdings Canada Limited (Aetna).
Accordingly, Aetna's results of operations are included with Maritime's from the
date of the acquisition. The increase in segment after-tax operating income
primarily resulted from the inclusion of Aetna's after-tax operating income of
$5.2 million partially offset by a decrease in Maritime's after-tax operating
income due to unfavorable group claims experience.
Segment after-tax operating income from corporate operations was $31.2
million in 1999, an increase of $22.5 million from $8.7 million in 1998. The
increase was primarily due to a $13.7 million decrease in unallocated corporate
overhead and expenses associated with the disposed businesses and higher net
investment income due to a higher level of corporate purpose assets. During the
fourth quarter of 1999, a corporate account was formed and all corporate type
assets were removed from the business units to the Corporate and Other Segment.
As part of this move, the group pension participating contractholders were
reimbursed at fair market value for these contracts. Because of this
transaction, there was no longer a need to calculate the participating
policyholders share of the change in these assets. As a result, 1999's segment
after-tax operating income includes a charge for this item for nine months
versus a full year in 1998, an improvement of $9.4 million.
Segment after-tax operating income from non-core businesses was $10.6
million in 1999, a decrease of $11.7 million from $22.3 million in 1998. The
decrease was due primarily to lower net investment income resulting from the
previously described disposals.
Amortization of goodwill increased $0.3 million in 1999, as compared to
1998, due to the acquisition of Aetna in 1999 partially offset by completing the
amortization period for Investors Guarantee Life in 1998.
67
General Account Investments
On the effective date of the Plan of Reorganization, the Company's invested
assets were allocated between the closed block and operations outside the closed
block. In view of the similar asset quality characteristics of the major asset
categories in the two portfolios, the invested assets in the closed block have
been combined with the Company's invested assets outside the closed block for
purposes of the following discussion and analysis.
Overall Composition of the General Account
Invested assets, excluding separate accounts, totaled $52.0 billion and
$48.6 billion as of December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, respectively. The
most significant difference between the portfolio composition as of December 31,
2000 compared to December 31, 1999 is the growth of cash and cash equivalents.
This is primarily the result of the sale of approximately $850 million of
non-participating pension contracts in December 2000, which had yet to be placed
in permanent investments as of the end of the year.
As of December 31,
------------------
2000 1999
-------------------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
-------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Fixed maturity securities (1) $32,535.0 62.5% $30,749.4 63.3%
Mortgage loans (2) 10,899.5 20.9 10,733.0 22.1
Real estate 519.0 1.0 548.5 1.1
Policy loans (3) 1,969.2 3.8 1,938.8 4.0
Equity securities 1,332.8 2.6 1,314.3 2.7
Other invested assets 1,393.7 2.7 1,311.1 2.7
Short-term investments 214.0 0.4 166.9 0.4
Cash and cash equivalents (4) 3,146.8 6.1 1,797.7 3.7
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total invested assets $52,010.0 100.0% $48,559.7 100.0%
========= ========= ========= =========
(1) In addition to bonds, the fixed maturity security portfolio contains
redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $732.0 million and
$630.6 million as of December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, respectively.
Carrying value is composed of investments categorized as
'held-to-maturity,' which are carried at amortized cost, and investments
categorized as 'available-for-sale,' which are carried at fair value. The
total fair value of our fixed maturity security portfolio was $32,355.1 and
$30,432.6 million, at December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999,
respectively.
(2) The fair value for our mortgage loan portfolio was $11,359.0 and $10,681.9
million as of December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, respectively.
(3) Policy loans are secured by the cash value of the underlying life insurance
policies and do not mature in a conventional sense, but expire in
conjunction with the related policy liabilities.
(4) Cash and cash equivalents are included in total invested assets in the
table above for the purposes of calculating yields on the income producing
assets for the Company. Cash and cash equivalents are not considered part
of Total Investments of the Company of $48,863.2 million and $46,762.0
million at December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, respectively. Closed
block Total Investments of $8,203.2 million as of December 31, 2000 are
presented in closed block assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets but
remain part of the Company's total invested assets.
Consistent with the nature of our product liabilities, our assets are
heavily oriented toward fixed maturity securities. We determine the allocation
of our assets primarily on the basis of cash flow and return requirements of our
products and secondarily by the level of investment risk.
Fixed Maturity Securities. Our fixed maturity securities portfolio is
predominantly comprised of low risk, investment grade, publicly and privately
traded corporate bonds and senior tranches of asset-backed securities (ABS) and
mortgage-
68
backed securities (MBS). Our fixed maturity securities portfolio also includes
redeemable preferred stock. As of December 31, 2000, fixed maturity securities
represented 62.6% of general account investment assets with a carrying value of
$32.5 billion, roughly comprised of 50% public securities and 50% private
securities. Each year we direct the majority of our net cash inflows into
investment grade fixed maturity securities. We typically invest between 5% and
15% of funds allocated to fixed maturity securities in below-investment-grade
bonds while maintaining our policy to limit the overall level of these bonds to
no more than 10% of invested assets. Allocations are based on our assessment of
relative value and the likelihood of enhancing risk-adjusted portfolio returns.
While the general account has profited from the below-investment-grade asset
class in the past, care is taken to manage its growth strategically by limiting
its size relative to our total invested assets.
The following table shows the composition by issuer of our fixed maturity
securities portfolio.
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Issuer
As of December 31,
------------------
2000 1999
-------------------------------------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
-------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Corporate securities .......................... $25,159.3 77.4% $23,497.7 76.4%
MBS/ABS ....................................... 5,480.6 16.8 5,266.7 17.1
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies ................... 205.8 0.6 297.3 1.0
Debt securities issued by foreign
Governments ................................ 1,548.7 4.8 1,554.1 5.1
Obligations of states and political
Subdivisions ............................... 140.6 0.4 133.6 0.4
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total .................................... $32,535.0 100.0% $30,749.4 100.0%
========= ========= ========= =========
Our MBS and ABS holdings, in keeping with our investment philosophy of
tightly managing interest rate risk, are heavily concentrated in commercial MBS
where the underlying loans are largely call protected, which means they are not
pre-payable without penalty prior to maturity at the option of the issuer,
rather than in residential MBS where the underlying loans typically have no call
protection. By investing in MBS and ABS securities with relatively predictable
repayments, we add high quality, liquid assets to our portfolios without
incurring the risk of excessive cash flow in periods of low interest rates or a
cash flow deficit in periods of high interest rates. We believe the portion of
our MBS/ABS portfolio subject to prepayment risk as of December 31, 2000 and
December 31, 1999 was limited to 3.3% and 3.9% of our total MBS/ABS portfolio
and 0.6% and 0.7% of our total fixed maturity securities holdings, respectively.
The securities valuation office (SVO) of the National Association of
Insurance Commissioners evaluates all public and private bonds purchased as
investments by insurance companies. The SVO assigns one of six investment
categories to each security it reviews. Category 1 is the highest quality
rating, and Category 6 is the lowest. Categories 1 and 2 are the equivalent of
investment grade debt as defined by rating agencies such as S&P and Moody's
(i.e., BBB-/Baa3 or higher), while Categories 3-6 are the equivalent of
below-investment grade securities. SVO ratings are reviewed and may be revised
at least once a year.
The following table sets forth the SVO ratings for our bond portfolio along
with an equivalent S&P rating agency designation. The majority of our bonds are
investment grade, with 86.3% invested in Category 1 and 2 securities as of
December 31, 2000. As a percent of total invested assets, our below investment
grade bonds, at 8.3% as of December 31, 2000, are higher than the American
Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) industry average of 5.9%, last published as of
December 31, 1999. This allocation reflects our strategy of avoiding the
unpredictability of interest rate risk in favor of relying on our bond analysts'
ability to better predict credit or default risk. Our bond analysts operate in
an industry-based, team-oriented structure that permits the evaluation of a wide
range of below investment grade offerings in a variety of industries, resulting
in a well-diversified high yield portfolio. A majority (64.3%) of our below
investment grade bonds are in category 3, the highest
69
quality below investment grade. Category 6 bonds represent securities that were
originally acquired as long-term investments, but subsequently became
distressed. The fair value of our category 6 bonds was $216.7 million and $167.4
million as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. For the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, $49.4 million, $24.8 million and $31.2 million
of interest on Category 6 bonds has been recognized in income but was
delinquent.
Fixed Maturity Securities -- By Credit Quality
As of December 31,
---------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
-------------------------- --------------------------
SVO S&P Equivalent Carrying % of Carrying % of
Rating (1) Designation (2) Value (3) Total Value (3) Total
- ---------- --------------- --------- ----- --------- -----
(in millions) (in millions)
1 AAA/AA/A ................. $14,609.4 45.9% $14,722.5 48.8%
2 BBB ...................... 12,850.9 40.4 11,014.2 36.6
3 BB ....................... 2,790.3 8.8 2,886.7 9.6
4 B ........................ 1,066.0 3.4 867.7 2.9
5 CCC and lower ............ 269.7 0.8 460.3 1.5
6 In or near default ....... 216.7 0.7 167.4 0.6
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total .................... $31,803.0 100.0% $30,118.8 100.0%
========= ========= ========= =========
(1) With respect to securities that are awaiting an SVO rating, we have
assigned a rating based on an analysis that we believe is equivalent to
that used by the SVO.
(2) Comparisons between SVO and S&P ratings are published by the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners.
(3) Does not include redeemable preferred stock with a carrying value of $732.0
million and $630.6 million as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Mortgage Loans. As of December 31, 2000, we held mortgage loans with a carrying
value of $10.9 billion, including $2.5 billion of agricultural loans and $1.2
billion of loans managed by our Canadian subsidiary, The Maritime Life Assurance
Company, of which $0.6 billion are government-insured by the Canada Mortgage and
Housing Corporation (CMHC).
The following table shows the distribution of our mortgage loan portfolio
by property type as of the dates indicated. Our commercial mortgage loan
portfolio consists primarily of non-recourse fixed-rate mortgages on fully, or
nearly fully, leased commercial properties.
As of December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
------------------------ ------------------------
Carrying % of Carrying % of
Value Total Value Total
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(in millions) (in millions)
Apartment ................ $ 2,393.1 22.0% $ 2,493.7 23.2%
Office Buildings ......... 2,465.1 22.6 2,551.8 23.7
Retail ................... 1,623.7 14.9 1,844.8 17.2
Agricultural ............. 2,510.6 23.0 1,891.4 17.6
Industrial ............... 905.8 8.3 1,005.1 9.4
Hotels ................... 414.7 3.8 425.5 4.0
Multi-Family ............. 71.8 0.7 80.7 0.8
Mixed Use ................ 274.7 2.5 140.2 1.3
Other .................... 240.0 2.2 299.8 2.8
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total ............... $10,899.5 100.0% $10,733.0 100.0%
========= ========= ========= =========
70
The following table shows the distribution of our mortgage loan portfolio by
geographical region.
Mortgage Loans -- By ACLI Region
As of December 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
---------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Number Carrying % of Carrying % of
of Loans Value Total Value Total
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
(in millions) (in millions)
East North Central ... 153 $ 1,101.0 10.1% $ 1,106.7 10.3%
East South Central ... 41 530.4 4.9% 299.0 2.8%
Middle Atlantic ...... 115 1,481.3 13.6% 1,675.9 15.6%
Mountain ............. 96 401.9 3.7% 355.5 3.3%
New England .......... 129 838.6 7.7% 896.5 8.4%
Pacific .............. 288 1,969.0 18.0% 2,117.8 19.7%
South Atlantic ....... 206 2,048.6 18.8% 1,926.9 18.0%
West North Central ... 70 368.2 3.4% 377.3 3.5%
West South Central ... 151 817.2 7.5% 742.9 6.9%
Canada ............... 883 1,343.3 12.3% 1,234.5 11.5%
--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
Total ........... 2,132 $10,899.5 100.0% $10,733.0 100.0%
========= ========= ========= ========= =========
The allowance for losses on mortgage loans on real estate and real estate
is maintained at a level that we believe to be adequate to absorb estimated
probable credit losses. Our periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance
for losses is based on past experience, known and inherent risks, adverse
situations that may affect the borrower's ability to repay (including the timing
of future payments), the estimated value of the underlying security, the general
composition of the portfolio, current economic conditions and other factors.
This evaluation is inherently subjective and is susceptible to significant
changes and no assurance can be given that the allowances taken will in fact be
adequate to cover all losses or that additional valuation allowances or asset
write-downs will not be required in the future. The portion of the investment
valuation allowance for our mortgage loan portfolio was $83.5 million, or 0.8%
of carrying value before reserves and $110.4 million, or 1.0% of carrying value
before reserves as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The portion of
the investment valuation allowance for our real estate to be disposed of was
$43.5 million, or 7.7% of carrying value before reserves and $58.1 million, or
9.6% of carrying value before reserves as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively.
71
Investment Results
The following table summarizes the Company's investment results for the
periods indicated. Overall, the yield, net of investment expenses, on our
general account portfolio increased from the year ended December 31, 1999. The
improved yield was primarily generated by favorable interest rates achieved on
our 2000 fixed maturity security acquisitions. In particular, 2000 bond
acquisitions benefited from a combination of higher U.S. Treasury rates and
relatively wide spreads in both the public and private sectors. While interest
rates declined substantially during the fourth quarter of 2000, they were well
above 1999 rates on a full calendar year basis. The average 10-year U.S.
Treasury rate in 2000 was 34 basis points higher than the average 10-year U.S.
Treasury rate in 1999.
For the Year Ended
December 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
Yield Amount Yield Amount
-------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
General account assets-excluding
policy loans
Gross income 8.26% $ 3,998.9 8.43% $ 3,805.8
Ending assets-excluding policy
Loans 50,040.8 46,620.9
Policy loans
Gross income 6.07% 118.6 5.75% 109.8
Ending assets 1,969.2 1,938.8
Total gross income 8.18% 4,117.5 8.32% 3,915.6
Less: investment expenses (274.9) (347.1)
--------- ---------
Net investment income 7.65% $ 3,842.6 7.58% $ 3,568.5
========= =========
(1) Total Company net investment income of $3,842.6 million is discussed in
this Management's Discussion and Analysis, which includes net investment
income of $3,251.0 million in the consolidated statements of income and
$591.6 million in Note 6 -- Closed Block to the audited consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity describes the ability of a company to generate sufficient cash
flows to meet the cash requirements of business operations. Historically, our
principal cash flow sources have been premiums, deposits and charges on policies
and contracts, investment income, maturing investments, and proceeds from sales
of investment assets. In addition to the need for cash flow to meet operating
expenses, our liquidity requirements relate principally to the liabilities
associated with our various life insurance, annuity, and structured investment
products, and to the funding of investments in new products, processes, and
technologies. Our product liabilities include the payment of benefits under life
insurance, annuity and structured investment products and the payment of policy
surrenders, withdrawals and policy loans.
John Hancock Life Insurance Company is wholly-owned by, and the primary
operating subsidiary of, John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. (JHFS). As an
insurance holding company JHFS is reliant on dividends of the Company for its
operating cash flows. State insurance laws generally restrict the ability of
insurance companies to pay cash dividends in excess of prescribed limitations
without prior approval. The Company's limit is the greater of 10% of the
statutory surplus or the prior calendar year's statutory net gain from
operations of the Company. The ability of the Company to pay shareholder
dividends is and will continue to be subject to restrictions set forth in the
insurance laws and regulations of Massachusetts, its domiciliary state. The
Massachusetts insurance law limits how and when the Company can pay shareholder
dividends. The Company, in the future, could also be viewed as being
commercially domiciled in New York. If so, dividend payments may
72
also be subject to New York's holding company act as well as Massachusetts law.
Currently, the Company does not expect such regulatory requirements to impair
its ability to dividend sufficient cash flows to sustain JHFS' liquidity and
capital needs. However, the Company can give no assurance it will declare or pay
dividends on a regular basis.
In September, October and December 2000, the Commissioner of Insurance for
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts approved, and the Company paid, dividends to
JHFS in the amount of $200.0 million, $200.0 million and $66.0 million,
respectively. None of these dividends were classified as extraordinary by state
regulators. During the fourth quarter of 2000, JHFS used funds from the
aforementioned dividends and other of its own cash flows, to fund a $267.2
million capital contribution to the Company. As of October 1, 2000, JHFS
purchased John Hancock Reinsurance Company and 45% of John Hancock Canadian
Holdings from the Company.
Sources of cash for the Company's insurance businesses are from premiums,
deposits and charges on policies and contracts, investment income, maturing
investments, and proceeds from sales of investment assets. In addition to the
need for cash flow to meet operating expenses, our liquidity requirements relate
principally to the liabilities associated with various life insurance, annuity,
and structured investment products, and to the funding of investments in new
products, processes, and technologies. Product liabilities include the payment
of benefits under life insurance, annuity and structured investment products and
the payment of policy surrenders, withdrawals and policy loans. The Company
periodically adjusts its investment policy to respond to changes in short-term
and long-term cash requirements and provide adequate funds to pay benefits
without forced sales of investments.
The liquidity of our insurance operations is also related to the overall
quality of our investments. As of December 31, 2000, $27,460.3 million, or 86.4%
of the fixed maturity securities held by us and rated by Standard & Poor's
Ratings Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P) or the
National Association of Insurance Commissioners were rated investment grade (BBB
or higher by S&P or 1 or 2 by the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners). The remaining $4,342.7 million of fixed maturity investments
were rated non-investment grade. For additional discussion of our investment
portfolio see the General Account Investments section above in this Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Segment
Operations.
We employ an asset/liability management approach tailored to the specific
requirements of each of our product lines. Each product line has an investment
strategy based on the specific characteristics of the liabilities in the product
line. As part of this approach, we develop investment policies and operating
guidelines for each portfolio based upon the return objectives, risk tolerance,
liquidity, and tax and regulatory requirements of the underlying products and
business segments.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,564.7 million, $1,621.9
million, and $1,290.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively. The decrease in 2000 compared to 1999 resulted primarily
from cash transferred to the closed block of $158.6 million, income attributed
to the closed block of $124.1 million, and an increase in purchases of trading
securities of $35.1 million, partially offset by an increase in net income of
$685.7 million. The increase in 1999 as compared to 1998 resulted primarily from
a decrease in benefits paid to policyholders, partially offset by an decrease in
net income.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1,318.5 million, $1,933.6
million and $1,303.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and
1998, respectively. The decrease in cash used in 2000 as compared to 1999
resulted from fewer acquisitions of fixed maturities during the year ended
December 31, 2000 than the comparable prior year period, prior year cash
payments related to acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries which resulted in
cash receipts in 2000 and a decrease in the issuance of mortgage loans on real
estate. The increase in net cash used in 1999 as compared to 1998 resulted
primarily from net cash paid related to acquisitions and disposals of
subsidiaries and a decrease in maturities, prepayments and scheduled redemptions
of fixed maturities partially offset by an increase in sales of real estate.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $797.3 million, $250.1
million and $850.0 million, for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively. The increase in 2000 as compared to 1999 resulted from a
reduction in cash payments made on withdrawals of universal life insurance and
investment-type contracts. Deposits on such universal life insurance and
investment-type contracts exceeded withdrawals by $989.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2000. The decrease in 1999 as compared to 1998 resulted
primarily from cash payments made on withdrawals of universal life insurance and
investment-type contracts which exceeded cash received from deposits on such
contracts by $221.9 million.
73
Cash flow requirements also are supported by a committed line of credit of
$1.0 billion. The line of credit agreement provides for two facilities: one for
$500 million pursuant to a 364-day commitment (subject to renewal) and a second
for $500 million pursuant to a five-year facility. The line of credit is
available for general corporate purposes. The line of credit agreement contains
various covenants, among these being that shareholders' equity meet certain
requirements. To date, we have not borrowed any amounts under the line of
credit.
As of December 31, 2000, we had $779.3 million of debt outstanding
consisting of $222.3 million of commercial paper borrowings, $447.2 million of
surplus notes, and $109.8 million of other notes payable. A new commercial paper
program has been established at the Company that will ultimately replace the
commercial paper program now in place at its indirect subsidiary, John Hancock
Capital Corporation.
A primary liquidity concern with respect to life insurance and annuity
products is the risk of early policyholder and contractholder withdrawal. The
following table summarizes our annuity policy reserves and deposit fund
liabilities for the contractholder's ability to withdraw funds for the indicated
periods:
As of December 31,
----------------------------------------------------------
2000 1999
--------------------------- ----------------------------
Amount % Amount %
------------- ------- ------------- ------
(in millions) (in millions)
Not subject to discretionary withdrawal provisions ...... $21,698.0 72.6% $19,335.2 70.3%
Subject to discretionary withdrawal adjustment:
With market value adjustment ......................... 824.2 2.8 1,126.3 4.1
At contract value .................................... 1,877.6 6.3 1,540.6 5.6
Subject to discretionary withdrawal at contract value
less surrender charge ................................ 5,455.8 18.3 5,496.5 20.0
----------------------------------------------------------
Total annuity reserves and deposit funds liability ...... $29,855.6 100.0% $27,498.6 100.0%
==========================================================
Individual life insurance policies are less susceptible to withdrawal than
are annuity contracts because policyholders may incur surrender charges and
undergo a new underwriting process in order to obtain a new insurance policy. As
indicated in the table above, there is a substantial percentage of annuity
reserves and deposit fund liabilities that are not subject to withdrawal. As a
matter of policy, we seek to include provisions limiting withdrawal rights from
general account institutional structured investment products. These include GICs
and funding agreements sold to plan sponsors where the contract prohibits the
contractholder from making withdrawals other than on a scheduled maturity date.
Individual life insurance policies (other than term life insurance
policies) increase in cash values over their lives. Policyholders have the right
to borrow from us an amount generally up to the cash value of their policy at
any time. As of December 31, 2000, we had approximately $17.1 billion in cash
values in which policyholders have rights to policy loans. The majority of cash
values eligible for policy loans are at variable interest rates which are reset
annually on the policy anniversary. Moreover, a portion of our fixed interest
rate policy loans have features that provide for reduced crediting rates on the
portion of cash values loaned. The amount of policy loans has remained
consistent over the past three years, at approximately $1.9 billion, $1.5
billion of which are in the closed block at December 31, 2000.
The risk-based capital standards for life insurance companies, as
prescribed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, establish a
risk-based capital ratio comparing adjusted surplus to required surplus for each
of our United States domiciled insurance subsidiaries. If the risk-based capital
ratio falls outside of acceptable ranges, regulatory action may be taken ranging
from increased information requirements to mandatory control by the domiciliary
insurance department. The risk-based capital ratios of all our insurance
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, were above the ranges that would require
regulatory action.
74
We maintain reinsurance programs designed to protect against large or
unusual losses. Based on our review of our reinsurers' financial statements and
reputations in the reinsurance marketplace, we believe that our reinsurers are
financially sound, and, therefore, that we have no significant exposure to
uncollectable reinsurance in excess of uncollectable amounts recognized in our
audited consolidated financial statements.
Given the historical cash flow of our subsidiaries and current financial
results, management believes that the cash flow from the operating activities
over the next year will provide sufficient liquidity for our operations, as well
as to satisfy debt service obligations and to pay other operating expenses.
Although we anticipate that we will be able to meet our cash requirements, we
can give no assurances in this regard.
Accounting Standards
For a discussion of accounting standards, see Note 1 to our audited consolidated
financial statements.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Information About Market Risk
Capital Markets Risk Management
The Company maintains a disciplined, comprehensive approach to managing
capital market risks inherent in its business operations. To mitigate these
risks, and effectively support Company objectives, investment operations are
organized and staffed to focus investment management expertise on specific
classes of investments, with particular emphasis placed on private placement
markets. In addition, a dedicated unit of asset/liability risk management (ALM)
professionals centralizes the implementation of its interest rate risk
management program. As an integral component of its ALM program, derivative
instruments are used in accordance with risk reduction techniques established
through Company policy and with formal approval granted from the New York
Insurance Department. The Company's use of derivative instruments is monitored
on a regular basis by the Company's Investment Compliance Department and
reviewed quarterly with senior management and the Committee of Finance of the
Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, John Hancock Life Insurance Company, (the
Company's Committee of Finance).
The Company's principal capital market exposures are credit and interest
rate risk, which includes the impact of inflation, although we have certain
exposures to changes in equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates.
Credit risk pertains to the uncertainty associated with the ability of an
obligor or counterparty to continue to make timely and complete payments of
contractual principal and/or interest. Interest rate risk pertains to the market
value fluctuations that occur within fixed maturity securities or liabilities as
market interest rates move. Equity and foreign currency risk pertain to price
fluctuations, associated with the Company's ownership of equity investments or
non-US dollar denominated investments and liabilities, driven by dynamic market
environments.
Credit Risk
The Company manages the credit risk inherent in its fixed maturity
securities by applying strict credit and underwriting standards, with specific
limits regarding the proportion of permissible below investment grade holdings.
We also diversify our fixed maturity securities with respect to investment
quality and credit concentration. Concentrations are monitored with respect to
issuer, industry, geographic location, and loan property-type. Where possible,
consideration of external measures of creditworthiness, such as ratings assigned
by nationally recognized rating agencies, supplement our internal credit
analysis. The Company uses simulation models to examine the probability
distribution of credit losses to ensure that it can readily withstand feasible
adverse scenarios. In addition, the Company periodically examines, on various
levels of aggregation, its actual default loss experience on significant asset
classes to determine if the losses are consistent with the (1) levels assumed in
product pricing, (2) ACLI loss experience and (3) rating agencies'
quality-specific cohort default data. These tests have generally found the
Company's aggregate experience to be favorable relative to these external
benchmarks and consistent with priced-for-levels.
As of December 31, 2000, the Company's fixed maturity portfolio was
comprised of 86.3% investment grade securities and 13.7% below-investment-grade
securities. These percentages are consistent with recent experience and
indicative of the
75
Company's long-standing investment philosophy of pursuing moderate amounts of
credit risk in anticipation of earning higher expected returns. We believe that
credit risk can be successfully managed given our proprietary credit evaluation
models and experienced personnel. For additional information regarding the
credit quality of the Company's portfolio see Note 3 to our audited consolidated
financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Segment Operations.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company maintains a tightly controlled approach to managing its
potential interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises from many of our primary
activities, as we invest substantial funds in interest-sensitive assets to
support the issuance of our various interest-sensitive liabilities, primarily
within our Protection, Asset Gathering and Guaranteed and Structured Financial
Products Segments.
We manage interest rate sensitive segments of our business, and their
supporting investments, under one of two broadly defined risk management methods
designed to provide an appropriate matching of assets and liabilities. For
guaranteed rate products, where contractual liability cash flows are highly
predictable (e.g., GICs or immediate annuities) we apply sophisticated
duration-matching techniques to manage the segment's exposure to both parallel
and non-parallel yield curve movements. Typically this management technique
involves a duration mismatch tolerance of only +/- .05 years, with other
measures used for limiting exposure to non-parallel risk. Duration measures the
sensitivity of the fair value of assets and liabilities to changes in interest
rates. For example, should interest rates increase by 100 basis points, the fair
value of an asset with a duration of 5 years is expected to decrease in value by
approximately 5.0%. For non-guaranteed rate products we apply scenario modeling
techniques to develop investment policies with what we believe to be the optimal
risk/return tradeoff given our risk constraints. Each scenario is based on near
term reasonably possible hypothetical changes in interest rates which illustrate
the potential impact of such events.
We project asset and liability cash flows, and then discount them against
credit-specific interest rate curves to attain fair values. Duration is then
calculated by re-pricing these cash flows against a modified or "shocked"
interest rate curve and evaluating the percentage change in fair value versus
the base case. As of December 31,2000, the fair value of fixed maturity
securities and mortgage loans supporting duration-managed liabilities was
approximately $24,950 million.
The risk management method for non-guaranteed rate products, such as whole
life insurance or single premium deferred annuities, is less formulaic, but very
data intensive, due to the less predictable nature of the liability cash flows.
For these products, we manage interest rate risk based on scenario-based
portfolio modeling that seeks to identify the most appropriate investment
strategy given probable policyholder behavior and liability crediting needs
under a wide range of interest rate environments. As of December 31, 2000, the
fair value of fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans supporting
liabilities managed under this modeling was approximately $18,800 million
Derivative Instruments
The Company uses a variety of derivative financial instruments, including
swaps, caps, floors, and exchange traded futures contracts, in accordance with
Company investment policy. Permissible derivative applications include the
reduction of economic risk (i.e., hedging) related to changes in yields, prices,
cash flows, and currency exchange rates. In addition, certain limited
applications of "income generation" are allowed. Examples of this type of use
include the purchase of call options to offset the sale of embedded options in
Company liability issuance or the purchase of swaptions to offset the purchase
of embedded put options in certain investments. The Company does not make a
market or trade derivatives for speculative purposes.
76
The Company's Investment Compliance Unit monitors all derivatives activity
for consistency with internal policies and guidelines. All derivatives trading
activity is reported monthly to the Company's Committee of Finance for review,
with a comprehensive governance report provided jointly each quarter by the
Company's Derivatives Supervisory Officer and Chief Investment Compliance
Officer. The table below reflects the Company's derivatives positions hedging
interest rate risk as of December 31, 2000. The notional amounts in the table
represent the basis on which pay or receive amounts are calculated and are not
reflective of credit risk. These fair value exposures represent only a point in
time and will be subject to change as a result of ongoing portfolio and risk
management activities.
As of December 31, 2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair Value
--------------------------------------------
Weighted-
Notional Average Term -100 Basis As of +100 Basis
Amount (Years) Point Change 12/31/00 Point Change
--------- ------------ ------------ --------- ------------
(in millions, except for Weighted-Average Term)
Interest rate swaps ..... $10,911.2 8.3 $ (344.1) $ (185.3) $ (23.3)
CMT swaps ............... 491.3 1.6 (4.6) (4.4) (4.3)
Futures contracts (1) ... 602.1 9.1 (28.4) (0.8) 26.6
Interest rate caps ...... 321.6 3.2 0.9 2.0 4.3
Interest rate floors .... 8,328.0 9.4 138.7 59.0 25.1
Swaptions ............... 30.0 4.4 (3.0) (1.3) (0.5)
--------- -----------------------------------------
Totals ............ $20,684.2 8.5 $ (240.5) $ (130.8) $ 27.9
========= =========================================
- --------------------------------------------
(1) Represents the notional value on open contracts as of December 31, 2000.
Our non-exchange-traded derivatives are exposed to the possibility of loss
from a counterparty failing to perform its obligations under terms of the
derivative contract. We believe the risk of incurring losses due to
nonperformance by our counterparties is remote. To manage this risk, Company
procedures include the (a) on-going evaluation of each counterparty's credit
ratings, (b) the application of credit limits and monitoring procedures based on
an internally developed, scenario-based risk assessment system, (c) quarterly
reporting of each counterparty's "potential exposure", (d) master netting
agreements, and (e) the use of collateral agreements. Futures contracts trade on
organized exchanges and have effectively no credit risk.
As of December 31, 2000, the Company had outstanding fixed income obligations
(in the form of a $450 million Surplus Note) with an aggregate fair value of
approximately $436.1 million. Through the application of an interest rate swap
overlay this debt has no material sensitivity to interest rate movements.
Equity Risk
Equity risk is the possibility that we will incur economic losses due to
adverse changes in a particular common stock. In order to reduce our exposure to
market fluctuations on some of our equity securities, we use equity collar
agreements. These equity collar agreements limit the market value fluctuations
on their underlying equity securities. Our equity collars are comprised of an
equal number of purchased put options and written call options, each with strike
rates equidistant from the stock price at the time the contract is established.
As of December 31, 2000, the fair value of our equity securities was $1,326.5
million. The fair value of our equity collar agreements as of December 31, 2000
was $11.7 million. A 15% decline in the December 31, 2000 value of the equity
securities hedged with the equity collar agreements would result in an
unrealized loss of $184.8 million. In certain cases the Company classifies its
equity holdings as trading securities. These holdings are marked-to-market
through the income statement, creating investment income volatility that is
effectively neutralized by changes in corresponding liability reserves.
77
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency risk is the possibility that we will incur economic losses
due to adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This risk arises in
part from our international operations and certain foreign currency-denominated
funding agreements issued to non-qualified institutional investors in the
international market. We use currency swap agreements of the same currency to
hedge the foreign exchange risk related to our investments and funding
agreements denominated in foreign currencies. We also have fixed maturities that
are denominated in foreign currencies. We also use derivatives to hedge the
foreign currency risk of these securities (both interest and principal
payments). At December 31, 2000, the par value of our foreign currency
denominated fixed maturity securities was approximately $462 million. The fair
value of our currency swap agreements at December 31, 2000 supporting foreign
denominated bonds was $11.0 million.
We estimate that as of December 31, 2000, a 10% immediate change in each of
the foreign currency exchange rates to which we are exposed, including the
currency swap agreements, would result in no material change to the net fair
value of our foreign currency-denominated instruments identified above. The
selection of a 10% immediate change in all currency exchange rates should not be
construed as a prediction by us of future market events but rather as an
illustration of the potential impact of such an event. Our largest individual
currency exposure is to the Canadian dollar.
The modeling technique we use to calculate our exposure does not take into
account correlation among foreign currency exchange rates or correlation among
various markets. Our actual experience may differ from the results noted above
due to the correlation assumptions utilized or if events occur that were not
included in the methodology, such as significant illiquidity or other market
events.
Effects of Inflation
Inflation has not been a material factor in our operations during the past
decade in terms of our investment performance, expenses, or product sales.
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
PART III.
ITEM 10. Directors and Executive Officers of John Hancock Life Insurance Company
Omitted
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
Omitted
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Omitted
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Omitted
PART IV
ITEM 14. Exhibits, Financial Statements, Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Documents filed as part of this report:
1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. See index to Audited Consolidated
Financial Statements and Schedules included elsewhere in this Form
10-K.
2. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. See index to Audited
Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules included elsewhere
herein.
3. EXHIBITS. See Exhibit Index elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
There were no reports on Form 8-K filed for John Hancock Life Insurance Company
during the fourth quarter of 2000.
(c) Exhibits
78
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
INDEX TO AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Auditors F-2
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 F-3
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-5
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-10 - F-55
Financial Statement Schedules F-56 - F-59
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors
John Hancock Life Insurance Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of John Hancock
Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at
Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial position of John Hancock Life
Insurance Company at December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Also in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 16, 2001
F-2
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
2000 1999
--------- ---------
(in millions)
Assets
Investments - Notes 3 and 4
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity--at amortized cost
(fair value: 2000--$11,651.2; 1999--$13,438.7) ... $11,888.6 $13,790.2
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: 2000--$15,790.3; 1999--$17,150.9) ......... 16,023.5 16,959.2
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: 2000--$830.6; 1999--$1,086.2) .............. 1,094.9 1,230.2
Trading securities--at fair value
(cost: 2000--$193.4; 1999--$53.8) ................. 231.6 84.1
Mortgage loans on real estate ........................ 8,968.9 10,733.0
Real estate .......................................... 519.0 548.5
Policy loans ......................................... 428.6 1,938.8
Short-term investments ............................... 151.9 166.9
Other invested assets ................................ 1,353.0 1,311.1
--------- ---------
Total Investments ................................. 40,660.0 46,762.0
Cash and cash equivalents ............................ 2,841.2 1,797.7
Accrued investment income ............................ 585.9 652.0
Premiums and accounts receivable ..................... 210.8 215.6
Deferred policy acquisition costs .................... 2,388.5 3,142.7
Reinsurance recoverable - Note 9 ..................... 2,829.0 2,246.0
Other assets ......................................... 2,100.6 1,724.8
Closed block assets - Note 6 ......................... 9,710.0 --
Separate accounts assets ............................. 26,454.8 28,047.6
--------- ---------
Total Assets ...................................... $87,780.8 $84,588.4
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS -- (CONTINUED)
December 31
2000 1999
--------- ---------
(in millions)
Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity
Liabilities
Future policy benefits ..................................... $22,996.4 $31,106.2
Policyholders' funds ....................................... 15,722.9 15,562.3
Unearned revenue ........................................... 671.3 490.2
Unpaid claims and claim expense reserves ................... 253.7 358.9
Dividends payable to policyholders ......................... 130.8 472.8
Short-term debt - Note 7 ................................... 245.3 453.8
Long-term debt - Note 7 .................................... 534.0 536.9
Income taxes - Note 5 ...................................... 428.8 161.8
Other liabilities .......................................... 2,600.7 2,551.2
Closed block liabilities - Note 6 .......................... 12,035.9 --
Separate accounts liabilities .............................. 26,454.8 28,047.6
--------- ---------
Total Liabilities ....................................... 82,074.6 79,741.7
Minority interest - Note 8 ................................. 290.3 93.5
Commitments and contingencies - Note 11
Shareholder's Equity - Note 12
Common stock, $10,000 par value; 1,000 shares authorized
and outstanding ........................................ 10.0 --
Additional paid in capital ................................. 4,998.9 --
Retained earnings .......................................... 330.1 4,782.9
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) .............. 76.9 (29.7)
--------- ---------
Total Shareholder's Equity .............................. 5,415.9 4,753.2
--------- ---------
Total Liabilities and Shareholder's Equity .............. $87,780.8 $84,588.4
========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31
--------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Revenues
Premiums ...................................................................... $2,190.4 $2,411.3 $2,109.0
Universal life and investment-type product charges ............................ 746.7 703.3 597.0
Net investment income - Note 3 ................................................ 3,251.0 3,568.5 3,328.0
Net realized investment gains, net of related amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs and amounts credited to
participating pension contractholders ($6.0, $85.8 and
$120.3, respectively) - Notes 1, 3 and 13 ................................... 83.9 175.2 106.1
Investment management revenues, commissions and other fees .................... 764.8 680.9 659.7
Other revenue (expense) ....................................................... (13.9) 0.1 10.3
Contribution from the closed block - Note 6 ................................... 124.1 -- --
-------- -------- --------
Total revenues ............................................................. 7,147.0 7,539.3 6,810.1
Benefits and expenses
Benefits to policyholders, excluding amounts related to net realized
investment gains credited to participating pension contractholders ($6.9,
$35.3, $79.1, respectively) -
Notes 1, 3 and 13 .......................................................... 4,092.5 5,133.0 4,082.6
Other operating costs and expenses ............................................ 1,507.7 1,384.4 1,357.8
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs, excluding
amounts related to net realized investment gains (losses) (($0.9),
$50.5 and $41.2, respectively) - Notes 1, 3 and 13 .......................... 183.8 164.2 261.2
Dividends to policyholders .................................................... 157.3 501.6 473.2
Demutualization expenses ...................................................... 10.6 96.2 18.0
-------- -------- --------
Total benefits and expenses ................................................ 5,951.9 7,279.4 6,192.8
-------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect
of accounting change .......................................................... 1,195.1 259.9 617.3
Income taxes - Note 5 ........................................................... 344.4 97.9 174.1
-------- -------- --------
Income before minority interest and cumulative effect of ........................ 850.7 162.0 443.2
accounting change
Minority interest - Note 8 ...................................................... (10.6) (1.6) (1.1)
-------- -------- --------
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change ............................ 840.1 160.4 442.1
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax - Note 1 ..................... -- (9.7) --
-------- -------- --------
Net income ...................................................................... $ 840.1 $ 150.7 $ 442.1
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated
Additional Other Total
Paid In Retained Comprehensive Shareholder's
Common Stock Capital Earnings Income (Loss) Equity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Balance at January 1, 1998............. $4,190.1 $ 446.7 $4,636.8
Comprehensive income:
Net income........................... 442.1 442.1
Other comprehensive
income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains
(losses)........................ (148.6) (148.6)
Foreign currency
translation adjustment.......... (6.0) (6.0)
Minimum pension liability......... (8.8) (8.8)
--------
Comprehensive income................... 278.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1998........... 4,632.2 283.3 4,915.5
Comprehensive income:
Net income........................... 150.7 150.7
Other comprehensive
income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains
(losses)........................ (307.0) (307.0)
Foreign currency
translation adjustment.......... 16.9 16.9
Minimum pension liability......... (22.9) (22.9)
--------
Comprehensive income................... (162.3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 1999........... $4,782.9 $ (29.7) $4,753.2
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-6
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S
EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME -- (CONTINUED)
Accumulated
Additional Other Total
Paid In Retained Comprehensive Shareholder's
Common Stock Capital Earnings Income (Loss) Equity
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 1999.............. -- -- $4,782.9 $(29.7) $4,753.2
Demutualization transaction $10.0 $4,956.4 (4,826.9) 139.5
Comprehensive income:
Net income before demutualization....... 44.0 44.0
Net income after demutualization........ 796.1 796.1
-------- --------
Net income for the year................. 840.1 840.1
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net unrealized gains (losses)........ 122.0 122.0
Foreign currency
translation adjustment.............. (19.1) (19.1)
Minimum pension liability............ 8.2 8.2
--------
Comprehensive income...................... 951.2
Capital contributions from parent
company.............................. 42.5 42.5
Dividend paid to parent company........... (466.0) (466.0)
Minority interest......................... (4.5) (4.5)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at December 31, 2000.............. $10.0 $4,998.9 $ 330.1 $ 76.9 $5,415.9
=============================================================================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-7
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income .................................................... $ 840.1 $ 150.7 $ 442.1
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Amortization of discount - fixed maturities ........... (121.8) (77.9) (55.6)
Realized investment gains, net ........................ (83.9) (175.2) (106.1)
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs ........... (334.0) (281.3) (173.8)
Depreciation and amortization ......................... 98.6 74.3 90.2
Net cash flows from trading securities ................ (147.5) (16.2) 4.2
(Increase) decrease in accrued investment income ...... (70.0) (116.3) 21.9
Decrease in premiums and accounts
receivable ........................................... 0.8 11.8 131.3
Increase in other assets and other liabilities, net ... (546.4) (218.7) (427.4)
Increase in policy liabilities and accruals, net ...... 1,776.9 2,253.6 1,347.4
Loss on sale of subsidiaries .......................... -- 21.3 --
Increase (decrease) in income taxes ................... 434.6 (4.2) 16.6
Initial cash transferred to the closed block .......... (158.6) -- --
Contribution from the closed block .................... (124.1) -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities ......... 1,564.7 1,621.9 1,290.8
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sales of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity ............................ -- 28.7 8.5
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .......................... 4,896.8 9,824.0 21,079.2
Equity securities available-for-sale ......................... 742.9 182.7 249.2
Real estate .................................................. 66.4 1,286.3 640.3
Short-term investments and other invested assets ............. 101.9 764.4 926.3
Maturities, prepayments and scheduled redemptions of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity ............................ 1,553.9 1,777.1 2,166.9
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .......................... 1,394.2 1,880.3 2,162.3
Short-term investments and other invested assets ............. 459.9 311.8 79.4
Mortgage loans on real estate ................................ 1,429.9 1,509.0 1,849.8
Purchases of:
Fixed maturities held-to-maturity ............................ (1,860.8) (2,715.1) (2,428.5)
Fixed maturities available-for-sale .......................... (7,553.0) (12,660.6) (24,118.7)
Equity securities available-for-sale ......................... (511.6) (384.1) (384.5)
Real estate .................................................. (46.0) (197.2) (152.0)
Short-term investments and other invested assets ............. (818.5) (715.4) (1,103.0)
Mortgage loans on real estate issued ......................... (1,605.8) (2,410.7) (2,265.3)
Cash received related to acquisition of business ............... 141.3 -- --
Net cash received (paid) related to sale of subsidiaries ....... 267.2 (206.5) --
Net cash paid for acquisition of subsidiary .................... -- (200.4) --
Other, net ..................................................... 22.8 (7.9) (13.0)
--------- --------- ---------
Net cash used in investing activities ................ (1,318.5) (1,933.6) (1,303.1)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-8
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS -- (CONTINUED)
Year Ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of common stock .......................................... $ 10.0 -- --
Contribution from Parent .......................................... 1,552.0
Payments to eligible policyholders under Plan of Reorganization ... (1,076.7) -- --
Dividend paid to parent company ................................... (466.0) -- --
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock ......................... -- $ 68.2 --
Universal life and investment-type contract deposits .............. 8,148.3 8,365.9 $8,214.8
Universal life and investment-type contract maturities and
withdrawals .................................................... (7,158.8) (8,144.0) (7,204.1)
Issuance of long-term debt ........................................ 20.0 6.0 77.0
Repayment of long-term debt ....................................... (73.2) (15.5) (298.1)
Net (decrease) increase in commercial paper ....................... (158.3) (30.5) 60.4
-------- -------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities ..................... 797.3 250.1 850.0
-------- -------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents .......... 1,043.5 (61.6) 837.7
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year ...................... 1,797.7 1,859.3 1,021.6
-------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year ............................ $2,841.2 $1,797.7 $1,859.3
======== ======== ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statement.
F-9
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
John Hancock Life Insurance Company (the Company), formerly known as John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company (the Mutual Company) and Subsidiaries, is
a diversified financial services organization that provides a broad range of
insurance and investment products and investment management and advisory
services.
Reorganization and Initial Public Offering
In connection with the Mutual Company's Plan of Reorganization (the Plan),
effective February 1, 2000, the Mutual Company converted from a mutual life
insurance company to a stock life insurance company (i.e., demutualized) and
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. (JHFS
or the parent company), which is a holding company. All policyholder membership
interests in the Mutual Company were extinguished on that date and eligible
policyholders of the Mutual Company received, in the aggregate, 212.8 million
shares of common stock, $1,438.7 million of cash and $43.7 million policy
credits as compensation. In addition, the Company established a closed block, to
fund the guaranteed benefits and dividends of certain participating insurance
policies. In connection with the Plan, the Mutual Company changed its name to
John Hancock Life Insurance Company.
In addition, on February 1, 2000, JHFS completed its initial public offering
(IPO) in which 102.0 million shares of common stock were issued at a price of
$17.00 per share. Net proceeds from the IPO were $1,657.7 million, of which
$105.7 million was retained by JHFS and $1,552.0 million was contributed to the
Company.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. Less than
majority-owned entities in which the Company has at least a 20% interest are
accounted for using the equity method. All significant intercompany transactions
and balances have been eliminated.
As of October 1, 2000, the Company sold 100% of the common stock of John Hancock
Reassurance Company Ltd. (JHReCO), a Bermuda based subsidiary, to JHFS for cash
of $44.9 million. The sale has been accounted for as a de-pooling of interests,
and accordingly all prior period consolidated financial statements have been
restated to exclude the results of operations, financial position, and cash
flows of JHReCO from the Company's financial statements. No gain or loss was
recognized on the transaction.
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Investments
In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities", the Company is required to classify its investments into one of
three categories: held-to-maturity, available-for-sale or trading. The Company
determines the appropriate classification of debt securities at the time of
purchase and re-evaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. Fixed
maturity investments include bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and redeemable
preferred stock and are classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale.
Bonds and mortgage-backed securities which the Company has the positive intent
and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and carried
at amortized cost. Fixed maturity investments not classified as held-to-maturity
are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value. Unrealized
gains and losses related to available-for-sale securities are reflected in
shareholder's equity, net of related amortization of deferred policy acquisition
costs, amounts credited to participating pension contractholders and applicable
taxes. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of
premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included
in investment income. The amortized cost of fixed maturity investments is
adjusted for impairments in value deemed to be other than temporary.
F-10
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
For the mortgage-backed bond portion of the fixed maturity investment portfolio,
the Company recognizes income using a constant effective yield based on
anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When
actual prepayments differ significantly from anticipated prepayments, the
effective yield is recalculated to reflect actual payments to date, and
anticipated future payments and any resulting adjustment is included in net
investment income.
Equity securities include common stock and non-redeemable preferred stock.
Equity securities that have readily determinable fair values are carried at fair
value. For equity securities which the Company has classified as
available-for-sale, unrealized gains and losses are reflected in shareholder's
equity as described above. Impairments in value deemed to be other than
temporary are reported as a component of realized investment gains (losses).
Gains and losses, both realized and unrealized, on equity securities classified
as trading are included in net investment income.
Mortgage loans on real estate are carried at unpaid principal balances adjusted
for amortization of premium or discount, less allowance for probable losses.
When it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts of
principal and interest due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage
loan agreement, the loan is deemed to be impaired and a valuation allowance for
probable losses is established. The valuation allowance is based on the present
value of the expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's original
effective interest rate, or on the collateral value of the loan if the loan is
collateral dependent. Any change to the valuation allowance for mortgage loans
on real estate is reported as a component of realized investment gains (losses).
Interest received on impaired mortgage loans on real estate is included in
interest income in the period received. If foreclosure becomes probable, the
measurement method used is collateral value. Foreclosed real estate is then
recorded at the collateral's fair value at the date of foreclosure, which
establishes a new cost basis.
Investment real estate, which the Company has the intent to hold for the
production of income, is carried at depreciated cost, using the straight-line
method of depreciation, less adjustments for impairments in value. In those
cases where it is determined that the carrying amount of investment real estate
is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized based on the difference
between the depreciated cost and fair value of the asset. The Company reports
impairment losses as part of realized investment gains (losses).
Real estate to be disposed of is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less
costs to sell. Any change to the valuation allowance for real estate to be
disposed of is reported as a component of realized investment gains (losses).
The Company does not depreciate real estate to be disposed of. During 1998, the
Company made a strategic decision to sell the majority of its commercial real
estate portfolio. Properties with a carrying value of $43.7 million, $979.7
million and $512.0 million were sold in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. As of
December 31, 2000, the plan to divest the Company of the majority of its
commercial real estate portfolio is substantially complete.
Policy loans are carried at unpaid principal balances which approximate fair
value.
Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost.
Partnership and joint venture interests in which the Company does not have
control or a majority ownership interest are recorded using the equity method of
accounting and included in other invested assets.
Realized investment gains and losses, other than those related to separate
accounts for which the Company does not bear the investment risk, are determined
on the basis of specific identification and are reported net of related
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and amounts credited to
participating pension contractholder accounts.
F-11
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses futures contracts, interest rate swap, cap and floor
agreements, swaptions and currency rate swap agreements for other than trading
purposes to hedge and manage its exposure to changes in interest rate levels,
and foreign exchange rate fluctuations, and to manage duration mismatch of
assets and liabilities. The Company also uses equity collar agreements to reduce
its exposure to market fluctuations in certain equity securities.
The Company uses futures contracts principally to hedge risks associated with
interest rate fluctuations on sales of guaranteed investment contracts and
funding agreements. Futures contracts represent commitments to either purchase
or sell securities at a specified future date and at a specified price or yield.
The Company uses interest rate swap, cap and floor agreements and swaptions for
the purpose of converting the interest rate characteristics (fixed or variable)
of certain investments to more closely match its liabilities. Interest rate swap
agreements are contracts with a counterparty to exchange interest rate payments
of a differing character (e.g., fixed-rate payments exchanged for variable-rate
payments) based on an underlying principal balance (notional principal) to hedge
against interest rate changes. Interest rate cap and floor agreements are
contracts with a counterparty which require the payment of a premium for the
right to receive payments for the difference between the cap or floor interest
rate and a market interest rate on specified future dates based on an underlying
principal balance (notional principal) to hedge against rising and falling
interest rates. Swaptions entitle the Company to receive settlement payments
from other parties on specified expiration dates, contingent on future interest
rates. The amount of such settlement payments, if any, is determined by the
present value of the difference between the fixed rate on a market rate swap and
the strike rate multiplied by the notional amount.
Currency rate swap agreements are used to manage the Company's exposure to
foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Currency rate swap agreements are contracts
to exchange the currencies of two different countries at the same rate of
exchange at specified future dates.
The Company invests in common stock that is subject to fluctuations from market
value changes in stock prices. The Company sometimes seeks to reduce its market
exposure to such holdings by entering into equity collar agreements. A collar
consists of a call option that limits the Company's potential for gain from
appreciation in the stock price as well as a put option that limits the
Company's potential for loss from a decline in the stock price.
Futures contracts are carried at fair value and require daily cash settlement.
Changes in the fair value of futures contracts that qualify as hedges are
deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the hedged asset or liability.
The net differential to be paid or received on interest rate swap agreements and
currency rate swap agreements is accrued and recognized as a component of net
investment income. The related amounts due to or from counterparties are
included in accrued investment income receivable or payable.
Premiums paid for interest rate cap and floor agreements and swaptions are
deferred and amortized to net investment income on a straight-line basis over
the term of the agreements. The unamortized premium is included in other assets.
Amounts earned on interest rate cap and floor agreements and swaptions are
recorded as an adjustment to net investment income. Settlements received on
swaptions are deferred and amortized over the life of the hedged assets as an
adjustment to yield.
F-12
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Interest rate swap, cap and floor agreements, swaptions and currency rate swap
agreements which hedge instruments designated as available-for-sale are adjusted
to fair value with the resulting unrealized gains and losses, net of related
taxes, included in shareholder's equity. The net unrealized gain (losses) on
derivatives hedging available-for-sale instruments included in shareholder's
equity was ($181.2) million, $86.1 million, and ($128.1) million, at December
31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The change in net unrealized gain
(losses) for derivatives recorded as part of other comprehensive income for the
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 was ($267.3) million, $214.2
million, and ($68.4) million, respectively. The fair value of those derivatives
used to hedge items other than available-for-sale instruments is not recognized
in the financial statements.
Equity collar agreements are carried at fair value and are included in other
invested assets, with the resulting unrealized gains and losses included in
realized investment gains (losses).
Hedge accounting is applied after the Company determines that the items to be
hedged expose it to interest or price risk, designates these financial
instruments as hedges and assesses whether the instruments reduce the hedged
risks through the measurement of changes in the value of the instruments and the
items being hedged at both inception and throughout the hedge period.
From time to time, futures contracts, interest rate swaps, cap and floor
agreements, swaptions and currency rate swap agreements are terminated. If the
terminated position was accounted for as a hedge, realized gains or losses are
deferred and amortized over the remaining lives of the hedged assets or
liabilities. Realized and unrealized changes in fair value of derivatives
designated with items that no longer exist or are no longer probable of
occurring are recorded as a component of the gain or loss arising from the
disposition of the designated item or included in income when it is determined
that the item is no longer probable of occurring. Changes in the fair value of
derivatives no longer effective as hedges are recognized in income from the date
the derivative becomes ineffective until their expiration.
Revenue Recognition
Premiums from participating and non-participating traditional life insurance and
annuity policies with life contingencies are recognized as income when due.
Premiums from universal life and investment-type contracts are reported as
deposits to policyholders' account balances. Revenues from these contracts
consist of amounts assessed during the period against policyholders' account
balances for mortality charges, policy administration charges and surrender
charges.
Premiums for contracts with a single premium or a limited number of premium
payments, due over a significantly shorter period than the total period over
which benefits are provided, are recorded in income when due. The portion of
such premium that is not required to provide for all benefits and expenses is
deferred and recognized in income in a constant relationship to insurance in
force or, for annuities, the amount of expected future benefit payments.
Premiums from long-term care insurance contracts are recognized as income when
due. Premiums from group life and health insurance contracts are recognized as
income over the period to which the premiums relate in proportion to the amount
of insurance protection provided.
Property and casualty insurance premiums are recognized as earned over the terms
of the contracts.
F-13
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Investment advisory, transfer agent, distribution and service fees are
recognized as revenues when services are performed. Commissions related to
security transactions and related expenses are recognized as income on the trade
date. Contingent deferred selling charge commissions are recognized as income in
the year received. Selling commissions paid to the selling broker/dealer for
sales of mutual funds that do not have a front-end sales charge are deferred and
amortized on a straight-line basis over periods not exceeding six years. This is
the approximate period of time expected to be benefited and during which fees
earned pursuant to Rule 12b-1 distribution plans are received from the funds and
contingent deferred sales charges are received from shareholders of the funds.
Future Policy Benefits and Policyholders' Funds
Future policy benefits for participating traditional life insurance policies are
based on the net level premium method. This net level premium reserve is
calculated using the guaranteed mortality and dividend fund interest rates,
which range from 2.5% to 8.0%. The liability for annual dividends represents the
accrual of annual dividends earned. Settlement dividends are accrued in
proportion to gross margins over the life of the contract.
For non-participating traditional life insurance policies, future policy
benefits are estimated using a net level premium method on the basis of
actuarial assumptions as to mortality, persistency, interest and expenses
established at policy issue. Assumptions established at policy issue as to
mortality and persistency are based on the Company's experience, which, together
with interest and expense assumptions, include a margin for adverse deviation.
Benefit liabilities for annuities during the accumulation period are equal to
accumulated contractholders' fund balances and after annuitization are equal to
the present value of expected future payments. Interest rates used in
establishing such liabilities range from 2.5% to 8.0% for life insurance
liabilities, from 2.0% to 14.2% for individual annuity liabilities and from 2.0%
to 12.6% for group annuity liabilities.
Policyholders' funds for universal life and investment-type products, including
guaranteed investment contracts and funding agreements, are equal to the
policyholder account values before surrender charges. As of December 31, 2000,
the Company had approximately $6.3 billion of funding agreements, none of which
contains early termination provisions. Policy benefits that are charged to
expense include benefit claims incurred in the period in excess of related
policy account balances and interest credited to policyholders' account
balances. Interest crediting rates range from 3.0% to 9.0% for universal life
products and from 4.6% to 16.0% for investment-type products.
Future policy benefits for long-term care insurance policies are based on the
net level premium method. Assumptions established at policy issue as to
mortality, morbidity, persistency, interest and expenses, which include a margin
for adverse deviation, are based on estimates developed by management. Interest
rates used in establishing such liabilities range from 6.0% to 8.5%.
Liabilities for unpaid claims and claim expenses include estimates of payments
to be made on reported individual and group life, long-term care, and group
accident and health insurance claims and estimates of incurred but not reported
claims based on historical claims development patterns.
Estimates of future policy benefit reserves, claim reserves and expenses are
reviewed continually and adjusted as necessary; such adjustments are reflected
in current earnings. Although considerable variability is inherent in such
estimates, management believes that future policy benefit reserves and unpaid
claims and claims expense reserves are adequate.
F-14
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Property and casualty reserves include loss reserve estimates based on claims
reported and unreported and estimates of future expenses to be incurred in
settlement of the claims provided for in the loss reserves estimates. These
liabilities include estimates of future trends in claim severity and frequency
and other factors that could vary as the losses are ultimately settled. During
1999, the Company sold the rest of its property and casualty business.
Participating Insurance
Participating business represents approximately 86.3%, 88.1%, and 87.7% of the
Company's life insurance in force, 97.9%, 98.3%, and 98.4% of the number of life
insurance policies in force, and 99.6%, 97.4%, and 97.3% of life insurance
premiums in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
The portion of earnings allocated to participating pension contractholders that
cannot be expected to inure to the Company is excluded from net income and
shareholder's equity.
The amount of policyholders' dividends to be paid is approved annually by the
Company's Board of Directors. The determination of the amount of policyholder
dividends is complex and varies by policy type. In general, the aggregate amount
of policyholders' dividends is related to actual interest, mortality, morbidity,
persistency and expense experience for the year and judgment as to the
appropriate level of statutory surplus to be retained by the Company. For
policies included in the closed block, expense experience is not included in
determining policyholders' dividends.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
Costs that vary with, and are related primarily to, the production of new
business have been deferred to the extent that they are deemed recoverable. Such
costs include commissions, certain costs of policy issue and underwriting, and
certain agency expenses. For participating traditional life insurance policies,
such costs are being amortized over the life of the contracts at a constant rate
based on the present value of the estimated gross margin amounts expected to be
realized over the lives of the contracts. Estimated gross margin amounts include
anticipated premiums and investment results less claims and administrative
expenses, changes in the net level premium reserve and expected annual
policyholder dividends. For universal life insurance contracts and
investment-type products, such costs are being amortized generally in proportion
to the present value of expected gross profits arising principally from
surrender charges and investment results, and mortality and expense margins. The
effects on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs of revisions to
estimated gross margins and profits are reflected in earnings in the period such
estimated gross margins and profits are revised. For non-participating term life
and long-term care insurance products, such costs are being amortized over the
premium-paying period of the related policies using assumptions consistent with
those used in computing policy benefit reserves. Amortization expense was $182.9
million, $214.7 million, and $302.4 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs is allocated to: (1) realized
investment gains and losses for those products that realized gains and losses
have a direct impact on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs;
(2) unrealized investment gains and losses, net of tax, to provide for the
effect on the deferred policy acquisition cost asset that would result from the
realization of unrealized gains and losses on assets backing participating
traditional life insurance and universal life and investment-type contracts; and
(3) a separate component of benefits and expenses to reflect amortization
related to the gross margins or profits, excluding realized gains and losses,
relating to policies and contracts in force.
F-15
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Realized investment gains and losses related to certain products have a direct
impact on the amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs as such gains
and losses affect the amount and timing of profit emergence. Accordingly, to the
extent that such amortization results from realized gains and losses, management
believes that presenting realized investment gains and losses net of related
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs provides information useful in
evaluating the operating performance of the Company. This presentation may not
be comparable to presentations made by other insurers.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and all highly liquid debt investments
with a maturity of three months or less when purchased.
Goodwill and Value of Business Acquired
The excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired
was $228.6 million and $155.3 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively, and is included in other assets in the consolidated balance
sheets. Goodwill is amortized on systematic bases over periods not exceeding 40
years, which correspond with the benefits estimated to be derived from the
acquisitions. Accumulated amortization was $63.6 million and $43.3 million at
December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Amortization expense included in other
operating costs and expenses was $20.3 million, $9.7 million, and $9.1 million,
in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The Company reevaluates the recoverability
of recorded goodwill based on the undiscounted cash flows of the related
business whenever significant events or changes indicate an impairment may
exist. If the undiscounted cash flows do not support the amount recorded, an
impairment is recognized by a charge to current operations to reduce the
carrying value of the goodwill based on the expected discounted cash flows of
the related business.
The Company records an asset representing the present value of future profits of
insurance policies inforce related to the businesses acquired. This asset is
recorded as the value of business acquired (VOBA) and amounted to $340.0 million
and $112.4 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, and is included
in other assets in the consolidated financial statements. VOBA is amortized in
proportion to the present value of expected gross profits. Amortization expense
included in other operating costs and expenses was $4.9 million, $1.3 million
and $1.7 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998 respectively.
On October 1, 1999, The Maritime Life Assurance Company (Maritime), an indirect
majority owned subsidiary of the Company, completed its purchase of Aetna Canada
Holdings Limited (Aetna Canada) for approximately $296 million. On March 1,
2000, the Company acquired the individual long-term care insurance business of
Fortis, Inc. (Fortis) through a coinsurance agreement for approximately $165
million. The acquisitions were recorded under the purchase method of accounting
and, accordingly, the operating results have been included in the Company's
consolidated results of operations from the applicable date of acquisition. Each
purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed
based on estimated fair values, with the excess of the applicable purchase price
over the estimated fair values recorded as goodwill. The goodwill calculation
related to the Fortis acquisition is preliminary and further refinements might
be necessary and are expected to be finalized in 2001. The unaudited pro forma
revenues and net income, assuming that the acquisition of Aetna Canada had
occurred at the beginning of 1999, were $7,899.2 million and $158.4 million,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 1999. The pro forma results,
assuming the acquisition of Fortis had taken place as of the beginning of 2000
and 1999, respectively, would not be materially different from the reported
results.
F-16
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
Separate Accounts
Separate accounts assets and liabilities reported in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets represent funds that are administered and invested
by the Company to meet specific investment objectives of the contractholders.
Investment income and investment gains and losses generally accrue directly to
such contractholders who bear the investment risk, subject in some cases to
minimum guaranteed rates. The assets of each account are legally segregated and
are not subject to claims that arise out of any other business of the Company.
Separate account assets are reported at fair value. Deposits, net investment
income and realized investment gains and losses of separate accounts are not
included in the revenues of the Company. Fees charged to contractholders,
principally mortality, policy administration and surrender charges, are included
in universal life and investment-type product charges.
Reinsurance
The Company utilizes reinsurance agreements to provide for greater
diversification of business, allow management to control exposure to potential
losses arising from large risks and provide additional capacity for growth.
Assets and liabilities related to reinsurance ceded contracts are reported on a
gross basis. The accompanying statements of income reflect premiums, benefits
and settlement expenses net of reinsurance ceded. Reinsurance premiums,
commissions, expense reimbursements, benefits and reserves related to reinsured
business are accounted for on bases consistent with those used in accounting for
the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance contracts.
Federal Income Taxes
The provision for federal income taxes includes amounts currently payable or
recoverable and deferred income taxes, computed under the liability method,
resulting from temporary differences between the tax basis and book basis of
assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established for deferred tax
assets when it is more likely than not that an amount will not be realized.
Foreign subsidiaries and U.S. subsidiaries operating outside of the United
States are taxed under applicable foreign statutory rates.
Foreign Currency Translation
The assets and liabilities of operations in foreign currencies are translated
into United States dollars at current exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are
translated at average rates during the year. The resulting net translation
adjustments for each year are accumulated and included in shareholder's equity.
Gains or losses on foreign currency transactions are reflected in earnings.
Severance
In 1999, the Company initiated a restructuring plan to reduce costs and increase
future operating efficiency by consolidating portions of its operations. The
plan consists primarily of reducing staff in the home office and terminating
certain operations outside the home office.
F-17
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
In connection with the restructuring plan, approximately 391 employees have been
or will be terminated. These employees are or have been associated with
operations in our Boston office and outside the home office. As of December 31,
2000, the liability for employee termination costs included in other liabilities
was $20.6 million. Employee termination costs, included in other operating costs
and expenses, were $18.8 million and $26.3 million for the years ended December
31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Of the total number of employees affected,
approximately 364 have been terminated, having received benefit payments of
approximately $24.5 million.
Accounting Changes
In December 2000, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
issued Statement of Position (SOP) 00-3, "Accounting by Insurance Enterprises
for Demutualizations and Formations of Mutual Insurance Holding Companies and
Certain Long-Duration Participating Contracts." The SOP, which was adopted with
respect to accounting for demutualization expenses by the Company on December
15, 2000, requires that demutualization related expenses be classified as a
single line item within income from continuing operations and should not be
classified as an extraordinary item. The adoption of SOP 00-3 resulted in the
reclassification of demutualization expenses previously recorded as an
extraordinary item in 1999 and 1998 of $93.6 million and $11.7 million,
respectively (net of tax of $2.6 million and $6.3 million, respectively). The
remaining provisions of this SOP, which will require (1) the inclusion of all
closed block activity together with all other assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses and (2) recognition of a policyholder dividend obligation that
represents cumulative actual closed block earnings in excess of expected
periodic amounts calculated at the date of the demutualization, are effective no
later than December 31, 2001. See Note 6 for a summary description of the closed
block assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, which do not include the
policyholder dividend obligation that will be required in 2001. The Company
currently is evaluating the effect that establishing the policyholder dividend
obligation will have on its results of operations and financial position. That
impact is not known at this time.
In April 1998, the AICPA issued SOP 98-5, "Reporting the Costs of Start-Up
Activities." The SOP, which was adopted by the Company on January 1, 1999,
requires that start-up costs capitalized prior to January 1, 1999 be written-off
and any future start-up costs be expensed as incurred. The adoption of SOP 98-5
resulted in a charge to operations of $9.7 million (net of tax of $5.9 million)
and was accounted for as a cumulative effect of an accounting change.
In March 1998, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the AICPA issued
SOP 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained
for Internal Use." SOP 98-1 provides guidance for determining whether computer
software is for internal use and when costs incurred for internal use software
are to be capitalized. SOP 98-1 was adopted by the Company on January 1, 1999.
The adoption of SOP 98-1 did not have a material impact on the Company's
consolidated financial statements.
F-18
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
SOP 98-7, "Deposit Accounting: Accounting for Insurance and Reinsurance
Contracts That Do Not Transfer Insurance Risk," provides guidance on how to
account for insurance and reinsurance contracts that do not transfer insurance
risk under a method referred to as deposit accounting. SOP 98-7 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after June 15, 1999. SOP 98-7 did not have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities." In June 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the
Effective Date of FASB Statement 133." This Statement amends SFAS No. 133 to
defer its effective date for one year, to fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2000. In June 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No. 138, "Accounting for Certain
Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities - an amendment of SFAS No.
133." This Statement makes certain changes in the hedging provisions of SFAS No.
133, and is effective concurrent with SFAS No. 133. As amended, SFAS No. 133
requires all derivatives to be recognized on the balance sheet at fair value,
and establishes special accounting for the following three types of hedges: fair
value hedges, cash flow hedges, and hedges of foreign currency exposures of net
investments in foreign operations. Special accounting for qualifying hedges
provides for matching the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging
instrument with the recognition of the corresponding changes in value of the
hedged item. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge,
changes in the fair value of derivatives will either be offset against the
change in the fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments
through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged
item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative's change
in fair value will be recognized immediately in earnings and will be included in
net realized and other investment gains. As a result, such amounts will not be
included in the determination of the Company's segment after tax operating
income.
The adoption of SFAS No. 133, as amended, will result in an increase in other
comprehensive income of $58.8 million (net of tax of $31.7 million) as of
January 1, 2001 that will be accounted for as the cumulative effect of an
accounting change. In addition, the adoption of SFAS No. 133, as amended, will
result in a charge to operations of $26.2 million (net of tax of $14.1 million)
as of January 1, 2001, that will be accounted for as the cumulative effect of an
accounting change. The Company believes that its current risk management
philosophy will remain largely unchanged after adoption of the Statement.
F-19
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 1 -- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - (Continued)
SFAS No. 133, as amended, precludes the designation of held-to-maturity fixed
maturity investment securities as hedged items in hedging relationships where
the hedged risk is interest rate risk. As a result, in connection with the
adoption of the Statement and consistent with the provisions of the Statement,
on January 1, 2001, the Company will reclassify approximately $12.1 billion of
its held-to-maturity fixed maturity investment portfolio to the
available-for-sale category. This will result in an additional increase in other
comprehensive income of $178.6 million (net of tax of $96.2 million) as of
January 1, 2001.
In September 2000, the FASB issued SFAS No 140, "Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," which
replaces SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial
Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." The Statement provides accounting
and reporting standards for transfers and servicing of financial assets and
extinguishments of liabilities. Those standards are based on consistent
application of a financial components approach that focuses on control. Under
that approach, after a transfer of financial assets, the Company recognizes the
financial and servicing assets it controls and the liabilities it has incurred,
derecognizes financial assets when control has been surrendered, and
derecognizes liabilities when extinguished. The Statement provides consistent
standards for distinguishing transfers of financial assets that are sales from
transfers that are secured borrowings. The Statement is effective for transfers
and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities occurring
after March 31, 2001.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin 101 (SAB 101), "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements." SAB 101 clarifies the SEC staff's views on applying generally
accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements.
In March 2000, the SEC issued an amendment, SAB 101A, which deferred the
effective date of SAB 101. In June 2000, the SEC issued a second amendment, SAB
101B, which deferred the effective date of SAB 101 to no later than the fourth
fiscal quarter of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1999. The Company
adopted SAB 101 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000. The adoption of SAB 101
did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operation or
financial position.
Codification
In March 1998, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
adopted codified statutory accounting principles (Codification) effective
January 1, 2001. Codification changes prescribed statutory accounting practices
and results in changes to the accounting practices that the Company and its
domestic life insurance subsidiaries will use to prepare their statutory-basis
financial statements. The states of domicile of the Company and its domestic
life insurance subsidiaries have adopted Codification as the prescribed basis of
accounting on which domestic insurers must report their statutory-basis results
effective January 1, 2001. The cumulative effect of changes in accounting
principles adopted to conform to the requirements of Codification will be
reported as an adjustment to surplus as of January 1, 2001. Management believes
that, although the implementation of Codification will have a negative impact on
the Company and its domestic life insurance subsidiaries' statutory-basis
capital and surplus, the Company and its domestic subsidiaries will remain in
compliance with all regulatory and contractual obligations.
Note 2-- Transactions with Parent
The Company provides JHFS with personnel, property and facilities in carrying
out certain of its corporate functions. The Company annually determines a fee
for these services and facilities based on a number of criteria. The amount of
the service fee charged to JHFS was $19.8 million in 2000.
F-20
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 -- Investments
The following information summarizes the components of net investment income and
realized investment gains, net:
Year Ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Net Investment Income
Fixed maturities ............................................. $2,281.6 $2,495.5 $2,207.5
Equity securities ............................................ 50.3 62.6 18.7
Mortgage loans on real estate ................................ 742.1 831.7 781.2
Real estate .................................................. 97.1 158.4 415.7
Policy loans ................................................. 24.5 109.8 111.9
Short-term investments ....................................... 146.1 92.3 45.3
Other ........................................................ 183.0 165.3 181.3
-------- -------- --------
Gross investment income ...................................... 3,524.7 3,915.6 3,761.6
Less investment expenses .................................. 273.7 347.1 433.6
-------- -------- --------
Net investment income ..................................... $3,251.0 $3,568.5 $3,328.0
======== ======== ========
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses), Net of Related
Amortization of Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and
Amounts Credited to Participating Pension
Contractholders
Fixed maturities ............................................. $ (128.6) $ (34.5) $ 110.3
Equity securities ............................................ 204.7 113.5 115.2
Mortgage loans on real estate and real estate ................ (13.1) 143.5 (15.6)
Derivatives and other invested assets ........................ 26.9 38.5 16.5
Amortization adjustment for deferred policy acquisition
costs .................................................... 0.9 (50.5) (41.2)
Amounts credited to participating pension contractholders .... (6.9) (35.3) (79.1)
-------- -------- --------
Net realized investment gains, net of related amortization
of deferred policy acquisition costs and amounts
credited to participating pension contractholders .......... $ 83.9 $ 175.2 $ 106.1
======== ======== ========
F-21
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 -- Investments - (Continued)
Gross gains of $308.7 million in 2000, $192.3 million in 1999, and $267.8
million in 1998, and gross losses of $123.6 million in 2000, $176.8 million in
1999, and $92.9 million in 1998, were realized on the sale of available-for-sale
securities.
The Company's investments in held-to-maturity securities and available-for-sale
securities are summarized below:
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(in millions)
December 31, 2000
Held-to-Maturity:
Corporate securities ................ $10,691.1 $ 459.2 $ 665.7 $10,484.6
Mortgage-backed securities .......... 1,104.2 10.3 48.2 1,066.3
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions ............ 87.7 3.0 0.7 90.0
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments ....................... 5.6 4.7 -- 10.3
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total ............................ $11,888.6 $ 477.2 $ 714.6 $11,651.2
========= ========= ========= =========
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate securities ................ $10,793.5 $ 485.5 $ 415.6 $10,863.4
Mortgage-backed securities .......... 3,430.4 82.2 25.2 3,487.4
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions ............ 24.8 1.7 -- 26.5
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments ....................... 1,354.1 112.3 12.7 1,453.7
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
corporations and agencies ......... 187.5 5.3 0.3 192.5
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total fixed maturities .............. 15,790.3 687.0 453.8 16,023.5
Equity securities ................... 830.6 360.0 95.7 1,094.9
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total ............................ $16,620.9 $ 1,047.0 $ 549.5 $17,118.4
========= ========= ========= =========
F-22
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 -- Investments - (Continued)
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- ---------
(in millions)
December 31, 1999
Held-to-Maturity:
Corporate securities ................ $12,523.0 $ 390.3 $ 680.3 $12,233.0
Mortgage-backed securities .......... 1,188.4 5.0 68.5 1,124.9
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions ............ 59.7 1.8 4.4 57.1
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments ....................... 5.0 5.0 -- 10.0
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
corporations and agencies ......... 14.1 -- 0.4 13.7
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total ............................ $13,790.2 $ 402.1 $ 753.6 $13,438.7
========= ========= ========= =========
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate securities ................ $11,103.0 $ 304.0 $ 431.1 $10,975.9
Mortgage-backed securities .......... 4,168.5 18.6 109.9 4,077.2
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions ............ 68.9 5.0 -- 73.9
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments ....................... 1,519.2 79.0 49.1 1,549.1
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
corporations and agencies ......... 291.3 1.6 9.8 283.1
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total fixed maturities .............. 17,150.9 408.2 599.9 16,959.2
Equity securities ................... 1,086.2 305.9 161.9 1,230.2
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total ............................ $18,237.1 $ 714.1 $ 761.8 $18,189.4
========= ========= ========= =========
F-23
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 -- Investments - (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities at December 31, 2000, by
contractual maturity, are shown below:
Amortized Fair
Cost Value
--------- ---------
(in millions)
Held-to-Maturity:
Due in one year or less .......................... $ 901.6 $ 919.4
Due after one year through five years ............ 3,332.4 3,396.6
Due after five years through ten years ........... 3,080.9 3,144.0
Due after ten years .............................. 3,469.5 3,124.9
--------- ---------
10,784.4 10,584.9
Mortgage-backed securities ....................... 1,104.2 1,066.3
--------- ---------
Total ............................................ $11,888.6 $11,651.2
========= =========
Available-for-Sale:
Due in one year or less .......................... $ 567.0 $ 575.6
Due after one year through five years ............ 3,363.0 3,356.3
Due after five years through ten years ........... 3,798.5 3,758.2
Due after ten years .............................. 4,631.4 4,846.0
--------- ---------
12,359.9 12,536.1
Mortgage-backed securities ....................... 3,430.4 3,487.4
--------- ---------
Total ............................................ $15,790.3 $16,023.5
========= =========
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because eligible
borrowers may exercise their right to call or prepay obligations with or without
call or prepayment penalties.
The sale of fixed maturities held-to-maturity relate to certain securities, with
amortized cost of $24.3 million and $8.5 million for the years ended December
31, 1999 and 1998, respectively, which were sold due to a significant decline in
the issuers' credit quality or as part of the sale of our property and casualty
operations in 1999. The related net realized gains on the sales were $0.9
million in 1999. There were no such gains in 1998.
The change in net unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities that has been
included in earnings during 2000, 1999 and 1998 amounted to $7.9 million, $15.4
million, and ($6.6) million, respectively.
The Company participates in a securities lending program for the purpose of
enhancing income on securities held. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, $87.1
million and $278.1 million, respectively, of the Company's bonds and stocks, at
market value, were on loan to various brokers/dealers, but were fully
collateralized by cash and U.S. government securities in an account held in
trust for the Company. The market value of the loaned securities is monitored on
a daily basis, and the Company obtains additional collateral when deemed
appropriate.
F-24
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 -- Investments - (Continued)
For 2000, 1999 and 1998, investment results passed through to participating
pension contractholders as interest credited to policyholders' account balances
amounted to $162.3 million, $170.8 million, and $178.1 million, respectively.
Mortgage loans on real estate are evaluated periodically as part of the
Company's loan review procedures and are considered impaired when, based on
current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable
to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. The allowance for losses is maintained at a level believed adequate
by management to absorb estimated probable credit losses that exist at the
balance sheet date. Management's periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the
allowance for losses is based on the Company's past loan loss experience, known
and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the
borrower's ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the
estimated value of the underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio,
current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is
inherently subjective as it requires estimating the amounts and timing of future
cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to
significant change.
Changes in the allowance for probable losses on mortgage loans on real estate
and real estate to be disposed of are summarized below. Included in deductions
in 2000 are $13.5 million of allowances for probable losses on mortgage loans
transferred to the closed block.
Balance at Balance at
Beginning End of
of Year Additions Deductions Year
---------- --------- ---------- ----------
(in millions)
Year ended December 31, 2000
Mortgage loans on real estate ... $110.4 $ 5.4 $ 45.8 $ 70.0
Real estate to be disposed of ... 58.1 17.1 31.7 43.5
------ ------ ------ ------
Total .............................. $168.5 $ 22.5 $ 77.5 $113.5
====== ====== ====== ======
Year ended December 31, 1999
Mortgage loans on real estate ... $111.0 $ 39.3 $ 39.9 $110.4
Real estate to be disposed of ... 112.0 22.5 76.4 58.1
------ ------ ------ ------
Total .............................. $223.0 $ 61.8 $116.3 $168.5
====== ====== ====== ======
Year ended December 31, 1998
Mortgage loans on real estate ... $127.3 $ 15.9 $ 32.2 $111.0
Real estate to be disposed of ... 25.5 97.0 10.5 112.0
------ ------ ------ ------
Total .............................. $152.8 $112.9 $ 42.7 $223.0
====== ====== ====== ======
F-25
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 -- Investments - (Continued)
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the total recorded investment in mortgage loans
that are considered to be impaired under SFAS No. 114, "Accounting by Creditors
for Impairment of a Loan," along with the related provision for losses were as
follows:
December 31
2000 1999
------ ------
(in millions)
Impaired mortgage loans on real estate with provision for losses ... $ 57.6 $147.1
Provision for losses ............................................... (16.8) (43.2)
------ ------
Net impaired mortgage loans on real estate ......................... $ 40.8 $103.9
====== ======
The average recorded investment in impaired loans and the interest income
recognized on impaired loans were as follows:
Year Ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
Average recorded investment in impaired loans........... $102.4 $137.9 $210.8
Interest income recognized on impaired loans............ 2.9 4.9 2.7
The payment terms of mortgage loans on real estate may be restructured or
modified from time to time. Generally, the terms of the restructured mortgage
loans call for the Company to receive some form or combination of an equity
participation in the underlying collateral, excess cash flows or an effective
yield at the maturity of the loans sufficient to meet the original terms of the
loans.
Restructured commercial mortgage loans aggregated $68.3 million and $133.1
million as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The expected gross
interest income that would have been recorded had the loans been current in
accordance with the original loan agreements and the actual interest income
recorded were as follows:
Year Ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
---- ----- -----
(in millions)
Expected...................... $5.8 $12.0 $23.7
Actual........................ 5.2 7.9 12.6
F-26
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 3 -- Investments - (Continued)
At December 31, 2000, the mortgage portfolio was diversified by geographic
region and specific collateral property type as displayed below:
Carrying Geographic Carrying
Property Type Amount Concentration Amount
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Apartments................. $2,082.4 East North Central............ $ 907.8
Hotels..................... 351.6 East South Central............ 475.0
Industrial................. 784.3 Middle Atlantic............... 1,115.8
Office buildings .......... 1,990.2 Mountain...................... 312.6
Retail..................... 1,284.3 New England................... 682.5
1-4 Family................. 71.8 Pacific....................... 1,573.9
Mixed Use.................. 234.9 South Atlantic................ 1,678.9
Agricultural............... 2,104.2 West North Central............ 296.1
Other...................... 135.2 West South Central............ 659.9
Canada/Other.................. 1,336.4
Allowance for losses....... (70.0) Allowance for losses.......... (70.0)
-------- --------
Total...................... $8,968.9 Total......................... $8,968.9
======== ========
Mortgage loans with outstanding principal balances of $27.8 million, bonds with
amortized cost of $117.1 million and real estate with a carrying value of $1.1
million were non-income producing for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Depreciation expense on investment real estate was $9.5 million, $8.1 million,
and $41.7 million in 2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively. Accumulated
depreciation was $66.2 million and $60.5 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively.
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and partnerships accounted for by
using the equity method of accounting totaled $183.6 million and $201.7 million
at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Total combined assets of these
joint ventures and partnerships were $1,235.0 million and $1,134.2 million
(consisting primarily of investments), and total combined liabilities were
$313.0 million and $267.1 million (including $124.8 million and $133.2 million
of non-recourse notes payable to banks) at December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Total combined revenues and expenses of such joint ventures and
partnerships were $1,908.4 million and $1,720.0 million, respectively, resulting
in $188.4 million of total combined income from operations before income taxes
in 2000. Total combined revenues of such joint ventures and partnerships were
$346.7 million and $1,435.6 million, and total combined expenses were $145.2
million and $1,128.0 million, respectively, resulting in $201.5 million and
$307.6 million of total combined income from operations before income taxes in
1999 and 1998, respectively. Net investment income on investments accounted for
on the equity method totaled $143.8 million, $65.1 million and $70.0 million in
2000, 1999, and 1998, respectively.
F-27
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 4 -- Derivatives
The notional amounts, carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company's
derivative instruments are as follows:
Assets (Liabilities)
Number of Contracts/ -----------------------------------------------
Notional Amount 2000 1999
----------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
2000 1999 Value Value Value Value
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------
(in millions)
Asset Hedges:
Futures contracts to sell
securities ...................... 5,874 19,288 $ (17.6) $ (17.6) $32.2 $ 32.2
Interest rate swap agreements
Notional ........................ $6,896.1 $5,824.0 (178.2) (290.4) 82.9 94.7
Average fixed rate-paid ......... 6.90% 6.91% -- -- -- --
Average float rate-received ..... 6.67% 6.06% -- -- -- --
Interest rate cap agreements ....... $ 42.2 $ 80.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
Interest rate swaption
agreements ...................... 30 30.0 (1.3) (1.3) (3.6) (3.6)
Currency rate swap
agreements ....................... 515.0 541.0 11.4 11.4 9.1 9.1
Equity collar agreements ........... -- -- 11.7 11.7 53.0 53.0
Liability Hedges:
Futures contracts to acquire
securities ...................... 647 4,075 1.4 1.4 (0.9) (0.9)
Interest rate swap agreements
Notional ........................ $3,008.2 $3,780.0 -- 114.3 -- (113.0)
Average fixed rate-received ..... 6.79% 6.97% -- -- -- --
Average float rate-paid ......... 6.68% 6.06% -- -- -- --
Interest rate swaps (receive CMT
rate) ............................. $ 491.3 $ 648.7 -- (5.2) -- 1.9
Interest rate cap agreements ....... 279.4 279.4 2.1 2.1 5.6 5.6
Interest rate floor agreements ..... 8,328.0 125.0 59.0 59.0 0.1 0.1
Currency rate swap
Agreements ....................... 3,423.4 5,470.2 -- (473.0) -- (57.4)
Financial futures contracts are used principally to hedge risks associated with
interest rate fluctuations on sales of guaranteed investment contracts and
funding agreements. The Company is subject to the risks associated with changes
in the value of the underlying securities; however, such changes in value
generally are offset by opposite changes in the value of the hedged items. The
contract or notional amounts of the contracts represent the extent of the
Company's involvement but not the future cash requirements, as the Company
intends to close the open positions prior to settlement. The futures contracts
expire in March 2001.
F-28
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 4 -- Derivatives - (Continued)
The interest rate swap agreements expire in 2001 to 2029. The interest rate cap
agreements expire in 2001 to 2007 and interest rate floor agreements expire in
2010. Interest rate swaption agreements expire in 2025. The currency rate swap
agreements expire in 2001 to 2021. The equity collar agreements expire in 2003.
Fair values for futures contracts are based on quoted market prices. Fair values
for interest rate swap, cap and floor agreements, swaptions, and currency swap
agreements and equity collar agreements are based on current settlement values.
The current settlement values are based on quoted market prices, which utilize
pricing models or formulas using current assumptions.
The Company's exposure to credit risk is the risk of loss from a counterparty
failing to perform to the terms of the contract. The Company continually
monitors its position and the credit ratings of the counterparties to these
derivative instruments. To limit exposure associated with counterparty
nonperformance on interest rate and currency swap agreements, the Company enters
into master netting agreements with its counterparties. The Company believes the
risk of incurring losses due to nonperformance by its counterparties is remote
and that such losses, if any, would be immaterial. Futures contracts trade on
organized exchanges and, therefore, have minimal credit risk.
Note 5 -- Income Taxes
The Company participates in the filing of a life/non-life consolidated federal
income tax return. The life company sub-group includes four domestic life
insurance companies (the Company, John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company,
Investors Partner Life Insurance Company and Investors Guaranty Life Insurance
Company) and a Bermuda life insurance company (John Hancock Reassurance Company,
Ltd.) that is treated as a U.S. company for federal income tax purposes. The
non-life subgroup consists of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., John
Hancock Subsidiaries, Inc. and John Hancock International Holdings, Inc.
In addition to taxes on operations, mutual life insurance companies are charged
an equity base tax. As the Company was a mutual life insurance company for the
entire year 1999, it is subject to the re-computation of its 1999 equity base
tax liability in its 2000 tax return. The equity base tax is determined by
application of an industry-based earnings rate to mutual companies' average
equity base, as defined by the Internal Revenue Code. The industry earnings rate
is determined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and is not finalized until
the subsequent year. The Company estimates its taxes for the current year based
on estimated industry earnings rates and revises these estimates up or down when
the earnings rates are finalized and published by the IRS in the subsequent
year.
Income before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of
accounting change includes the following:
Year Ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
-------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Domestic ....................................................... $1,125.5 $ 211.7 $ 585.1
Foreign ........................................................ 69.6 48.2 32.2
-------- -------- --------
Income before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative
effect of accounting change .................................... $1,195.1 $ 259.9 $ 617.3
======== ======== ========
F-29
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 5 -- Income Taxes - (Continued)
The components of income taxes were as follows:
Year Ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
Current taxes:
Federal ........................... $ 18.1 $(62.5) $223.6
Foreign ........................... 7.5 2.6 1.9
State ............................. 12.0 5.8 6.3
------ ------ ------
37.6 (54.1) 231.8
Deferred taxes:
Federal ........................... 284.7 137.7 (64.5)
Foreign ........................... 23.1 15.4 7.7
State ............................. (1.0) (1.1) (0.9)
------ ------ ------
306.8 152.0 (57.7)
------ ------ ------
Total income taxes ................... $344.4 $ 97.9 $174.1
====== ====== ======
A reconciliation of income taxes computed by applying the federal income tax
rate to income before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of
accounting change and the consolidated income tax expense charged to operations
follows:
Year Ended December 31
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(in millions)
Tax at 35% ............................... $418.2 $ 91.0 $216.1
Add (deduct):
Equity base tax ....................... (46.0) 22.2 (19.9)
Prior year taxes ...................... (0.3) 2.1 5.8
Tax credits ........................... (20.6) (12.9) (13.0)
Foreign taxes ......................... 0.4 1.0 2.5
Tax exempt investment income .......... (16.4) (19.4) (24.4)
Non-taxable gain on sale of subsidiary -- (15.4) --
Disallowed demutualization expenses ... -- 31.1 --
Other ................................. 9.1 (1.8) 7.0
------ ------ ------
Total income taxes ............... $344.4 $ 97.9 $174.1
====== ====== ======
F-30
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 5 -- Income Taxes - (Continued)
The significant components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities
were as follows:
December 31
2000 1999
-------- --------
(in millions)
Deferred tax assets:
Policy reserve adjustments .................... $ 458.8 $ 803.1
Other postretirement benefits ................. 149.4 151.1
Book over tax basis of investments ............ 168.7 119.7
Dividends payable to policyholders ............ 117.6 129.0
Unearned premium .............................. 93.3 58.3
Interest ...................................... 38.3 38.3
Other ......................................... -- 67.0
-------- --------
Total deferred tax assets ................. 1,026.1 1,366.5
-------- --------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred policy acquisition costs ............. 777.6 805.1
Depreciation .................................. 212.2 232.1
Basis in partnerships ......................... 109.8 159.2
Market discount on bonds ...................... 64.2 59.2
Pension plan expense .......................... 114.6 82.5
Capitalized charges related to mutual funds ... 56.9 71.8
Unrealized gains .............................. 112.6 34.5
Other ......................................... 74.2 --
-------- --------
Total deferred tax liabilities ............ 1,522.1 1,444.4
-------- --------
Net deferred tax liabilities .............. $ 496.0 $ 77.9
======== ========
The Company received an income tax refund of $24.3 million, and made income tax
payments of $86.2 million, and $158.8 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively.
F-31
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS- (CONTINUED)
Note 6 -- Closed Block
Under the Plan, on February 1, 2000, the Company created a closed block for the
benefit of policies included therein. The following tables set forth certain
summarized financial information relating to the closed block as of the dates
indicated:
December 31, February 1,
2000 2000
------------ -----------
Assets (in millions)
Investments
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity--at amortized cost
(fair value: December 31--$2,327.4; February 1--$2,259.6) ... $ 2,269.9 $ 2,270.7
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: December 31--$2,378.7; February 1--$2,275.1) .......... 2,353.0 2,199.2
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale--at fair value
(cost: December 31--$5.3; February 1--$6.4) .................. 6.3 3.4
Mortgage loans on real estate ...................................... 1,930.6 1,875.9
Policy loans ....................................................... 1,540.6 1,561.2
Short-term investments ............................................. 62.1 --
Other invested assets .............................................. 40.7 5.3
--------- ---------
Total Investments ............................................... 8,203.2 7,915.7
Cash and cash equivalents .......................................... 305.6 158.6
Accrued investment income .......................................... 149.3 136.2
Premiums and accounts receivable ................................... 27.1 4.0
Deferred policy acquisition costs .................................. 947.3 1,062.5
Other assets ....................................................... 77.5 66.0
--------- ---------
Total closed block assets ...................................... $ 9,710.0 $ 9,343.0
========= =========
Liabilities
Future policy benefits ............................................. $ 9,910.5 $ 9,732.8
Policyholders' funds ............................................... 1,459.5 1,885.4
Other liabilities .................................................. 665.9 500.1
--------- ---------
Total closed block liabilities ................................. $12,035.9 $12,118.3
========= =========
For the Period
February 1, through
December 31, 2000
-------------------
Revenues (in millions)
Premiums .............................................. $ 865.0
Net investment income ................................. 591.6
Realized investment gains, net ........................ 11.7
Other expense ......................................... (0.6)
--------
Total revenues ..................................... 1,467.7
Benefits and Expenses
Benefits to policyholders ............................. 870.0
Other operating costs and expenses .................... (10.0)
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ................................... 76.5
Dividends to policyholders ............................ 407.1
--------
Total benefits and expenses ........................ 1,343.6
--------
Contribution from the closed block ................. $ 124.1
========
F-32
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 6 -- Closed Block - (Continued)
Gross losses of $7.2 million in 2000 were realized on sales of
available-for-sale securities allocated to the closed block. There were no gross
gains realized in 2000.
Investments in held-to-maturity securities and available-for-sale securities
allocated to the closed block are summarized below:
Gross Gross
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair
Cost Gains Losses Value
--------- ---------- ---------- --------
December 31, 2000 (in millions)
Held-to-Maturity:
Corporate securities ................ $2,157.0 $ 94.6 $ 33.4 $2,218.2
Mortgage-backed securities .......... 98.3 1.2 4.8 94.7
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions ............ 14.6 0.1 0.2 14.5
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total ............................ $2,269.9 $ 95.9 $ 38.4 $2,327.4
======== ======== ======== ========
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate securities ................ $1,485.4 $ 42.8 $ 80.4 $1,447.8
Mortgage-backed securities .......... 784.9 14.5 8.5 790.9
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions ............ 11.3 0.4 -- 11.7
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments ....................... 84.0 6.7 1.4 89.3
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government
corporations and agencies ......... 13.1 0.2 -- 13.3
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total fixed maturities .............. 2,378.7 64.6 90.3 2,353.0
Equity securities ................... 5.3 1.6 0.6 6.3
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total ............................ $2,384.0 $ 66.2 $ 90.9 $2,359.3
======== ======== ======== ========
F-33
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 6 -- Closed Block - (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities at December 31, 2000, by
contractual maturity, are shown below:
Amortized Fair
Cost Value
--------- --------
(in millions)
Held-to-Maturity:
Due in one year or less ............................ $ 202.2 $ 206.0
Due after one year through five years .............. 803.6 821.2
Due after five years through ten years ............. 587.1 614.1
Due after ten years ................................ 578.7 591.4
-------- --------
2,171.6 2,232.7
Mortgage-backed securities ......................... 98.3 94.7
-------- --------
Total .............................................. $2,269.9 $2,327.4
======== ========
Available-for-Sale:
Due in one year or less ............................ $ 64.5 $ 66.0
Due after one year through five years .............. 431.7 431.4
Due after five years through ten years ............. 473.8 466.8
Due after ten years ................................ 623.8 597.9
-------- --------
1,593.8 1,562.1
Mortgage-backed securities ......................... 784.9 790.9
-------- --------
Total .............................................. $2,378.7 $2,353.0
======== ========
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because eligible
borrowers may exercise their right to call or prepay obligations with or without
call or prepayment penalties.
At December 31, 2000, the mortgage portfolio was diversified by geographic
region and specific collateral property type as displayed below:
Carrying Geographic Carrying
Property Type Amount Concentration Amount
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(in millions) (in millions)
Apartments................. $ 324.3 East North Central............ $ 201.1
Hotels..................... 66.1 East South Central............ 58.5
Industrial................. 127.2 Middle Atlantic............... 378.0
Office buildings .......... 494.6 Mountain...................... 92.1
Retail..................... 350.4 New England................... 162.0
1-4 Family................. -- Pacific....................... 420.7
Mixed Use.................. 41.8 South Atlantic................ 384.5
Agricultural............... 433.1 West North Central............ 74.9
Other...................... 106.6 West South Central............ 162.7
Canada/Other.................. 9.6
Allowance for losses....... (13.5) Allowance for losses.......... (13.5)
------------------ ------------------
Total...................... $1,930.6 Total......................... $1,930.6
================== ==================
F-34
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 7 -- Debt and Line of Credit
Short-term and long-term debt consists of the following:
December 31
2000 1999
------ ------
(in millions)
Short-term debt:
Commercial paper ...................................................... $222.3 $380.6
Current maturities of long-term debt .................................. 23.0 73.2
------ ------
Total short-term debt .................................................... 245.3 453.8
------ ------
Long-term debt:
Surplus notes, 7.38% maturing in 2024 ................................. 447.2 447.1
Notes payable, interest ranging from 5.43% to 9.60%, due in varying
amounts to 2005 ..................................................... 109.8 163.0
------ ------
Total long-term debt ..................................................... 557.0 610.1
Less current maturities .................................................. (23.0) (73.2)
------ ------
Long-term debt ........................................................... 534.0 536.9
------ ------
Total debt ........................................................... $779.3 $990.7
====== ======
The Company issues commercial paper primarily to take advantage of current
investment opportunities, balance operating cash flows and existing commitments
and meet working capital needs. The weighted average interest rate for
outstanding commercial paper at December 31, 2000 and 1999 was 6.59% and 6.28%,
respectively. The weighted average life for outstanding commercial paper at
December 31, 2000 and 1999 was approximately 26 days and 11 days, respectively.
Commercial paper borrowing arrangements are supported by a syndicated line of
credit.
The issuance of surplus notes was approved by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Division of Insurance, and any payments of interest or principal on the surplus
notes require the prior approval of the Commissioner of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts Division of Insurance.
At December 31, 2000, the Company had a syndicated line of credit with a group
of banks totaling $1.0 billion, $500.0 million of which expires on August 2,
2001 and $500.0 million of which expires on August 3, 2005. The banks will
commit, when requested, to loan funds at prevailing interest rates as determined
in accordance with the line of credit agreement. Under the terms of the
agreement, the Company is required to maintain certain minimum levels of net
worth and comply with certain other covenants, which were met at December 31,
2000. At December 31, 2000, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the
agreement.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows: 2001--$23.0 million;
2002--$38.0 million; 2003--$22.9 million; 2004--$6.0 million; 2005--$19.9
million and thereafter--$447.2 million.
Interest expense on debt, included in other operating costs and expenses, was
$63.4 million, $70.1 million, and $76.7 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. Interest paid amounted to $63.4 million in 2000, $70.1 million in
1999, and $76.7 million in 1998.
F-35
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 8 -- Minority Interest
Minority interest relates to the portion of John Hancock Canadian Holdings
Limited (JHCH) owned by JHFS and the preferred stock issued by Maritime, an
indirect majority owned subsidiary of the Company.
As of October 1, 2000, the Company sold 45% of the common stock of JHCH, the
parent company of Maritime, to JHFS for cash of $222.3 million. No gain or loss
was recognized on the transaction. For financial reporting purposes, the assets,
liabilities, and earnings of JHCH are consolidated in the Company's financial
statements. JHFS's interest in JHCH of $196.8 million as of December 31, 2000
and the related income attributable to the interest of $5.2 million in 2000 is
reflected in Minority Interest in the consolidated balance sheets and statements
of income. The Board of Directors of JHFS also has authorized the purchase of
the remaining JHCH shares from the Company over time as well as the shares of
certain other foreign subsidiaries.
On November 19, 1999, Maritime issued $68.2 million of Non-Cumulative Redeemable
Second Preferred Shares, Series 1 (Series 1 Preferred Shares) at a price of 25
Canadian dollars per share. Dividends on the Series 1 Preferred Shares are
payable quarterly, through December 31, 2004, at a rate of 0.38125 Canadian
dollars per share. Commencing on January 1, 2005, the Series 1 Preferred Shares
dividends will be calculated by applying 25 Canadian dollars to the greater of
one quarter of 90% of prime rate and 5.85%. The Series 1 Preferred Shares are
nonvoting and redeemable at Maritime's sole option any time after December 31,
2004 at a price of 25.50 Canadian dollars plus all declared and unpaid
dividends. In addition, shareholders as of December 31, 2004 have the option to
convert their Series 1 Preferred Shares to Non-Cumulative Redeemable Second
Preferred Shares, Series 2 (Series 2 Preferred Shares). The Series 2 Preferred
Shares will have a dividend rate of not less than 95% of the yield of certain
bonds of the Government of Canada.
In 1986, Maritime issued $25.3 million of Series A Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock (Preferred Stock). Dividends on the Preferred Stock are payable
quarterly at 18% of the average of two prime rates of two specified Canadian
banks. The Preferred Stock is nonvoting and redeemable at Maritime's sole option
at a price of 25 Canadian dollars per share.
F-36
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 9 -- Reinsurance
The effect of reinsurance on premiums written and earned was as follows:
2000 1999 1998
Premiums Premiums Premiums
-------- -------- --------
Written Earned Written Earned Written Earned
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Life, Health and Annuity:
Direct .................... $3,158.1 $3,157.4 $3,437.1 $3,435.2 $2,830.4 $2,828.4
Assumed ................... 465.1 465.1 312.5 312.5 351.9 351.9
Ceded ..................... (1,432.1) (1,432.1) (1,336.7) (1,336.7) (1,071.4) (1,071.3)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net life, health and
annuity premiums ....... 2,191.1 2,190.4 2,412.9 2,411.0 2,110.9 2,109.0
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Property and Casualty:
Direct .................... -- -- -- -- 0.4 7.1
Assumed ................... -- -- 0.3 0.3 -- 1.9
Ceded ..................... -- -- -- -- (0.4) (9.0)
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net property and
casualty premiums ...... -- -- 0.3 0.3 -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net premiums ........... $2,191.1 $2,190.4 $2,413.2 $2,411.3 $2,110.9 $2,109.0
======== ======== ======== ======== ======== ========
For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, benefits to policyholders
under life, health and annuity ceded reinsurance contracts were $734.5 million,
$576.3 million, and $814.6 million, respectively.
On February 28, 1997, the Company sold a major portion of its group insurance
business to UNICARE Life & Health Insurance Company (UNICARE), a wholly owned
subsidiary of WellPoint Health Networks, Inc. The business sold included the
Company's group accident and health business and related group life business and
Cost Care, Inc., Hancock Association Services Group and Tri-State, Inc., all of
which were indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The Company
retained its group long-term care operations. The insurance business sold was
transferred to UNICARE through a 100% coinsurance agreement.
In connection with the coinsurance arrangement, the Company initially secured a
$397.0 million letter of credit facility with a group of banks. Under the terms
of the letter of credit facility agreement, the banks agreed to issue a letter
of credit to the Company pursuant to which the Company may draw up to the amount
of the letter of credit for any claims not satisfied by UNICARE under the
coinsurance agreement after the Company has incurred the first $113.0 million of
losses from such claims. The amount available pursuant to the letter of credit
agreement and any letter of credit issued thereunder automatically will be
reduced on a scheduled basis consistent with the anticipated runoff of
liabilities related to the business reinsured under the coinsurance agreement.
The letter of credit facility was reduced to $272.0 million effective March 1,
2000 and is scheduled to be reduced again to $127.0 million on March 1, 2001.
The letter of credit and any letter of credit issued thereunder are scheduled to
expire on March 1, 2002. The Company remains liable to its policyholders to the
extent that UNICARE does not meet its contractual obligations under the
coinsurance agreement.
F-37
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 9 - Reinsurance - (Continued)
Through the Company's group health insurance operations, the Company entered
into a number of reinsurance arrangements in respect of personal accident
insurance and the occupational accident component of workers compensation
insurance, a portion of which was originated through a pool managed by Unicover
Managers, Inc. Under these arrangements, the Company both assumed risks as a
reinsurer, and also passed 95% of these risks on to other companies. This
business had originally been reinsured by a number of different companies, and
has become the subject of widespread disputes. The disputes concern the
placement of the business with reinsurers and recovery of the reinsurance. The
Company is engaged in disputes, including a number of legal proceedings, in
respect of this business. The risk to the Company is that other companies that
reinsured the business from the Company may seek to avoid their reinsurance
obligations. However, the Company believes that it has a reasonable legal
position in this matter. During the fourth quarter of 1999 and early 2000, the
Company received additional information about its exposure to losses under the
various reinsurance programs. As a result of this additional information and in
connection with global settlement discussions initiated in late 1999 with other
parties involved in the reinsurance programs, during the fourth quarter of 1999
the Company recognized a charge for uncollectible reinsurance of $133.7 million,
after tax, as its best estimate of its remaining loss exposure. The Company
believes that any exposure to loss from this issue, in addition to amounts
already provided for as of December 31, 2000, would not be material.
Reinsurance ceded contracts do not relieve the Company from its obligations to
policyholders. The Company remains liable to its policyholders for the portion
reinsured to the extent that any reinsurer does not meet its obligations for
reinsurance ceded to it under the reinsurance agreements. Failure of the
reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to the Company;
consequently, estimates are established for amounts deemed or estimated to be
uncollectible. To minimize its exposure to significant losses from reinsurance
insolvencies, the Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers
and monitors concentration of credit risk arising from similar characteristics
of the reinsurers.
F-38
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 10 -- Pension Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The Company provides pension benefits to substantially all employees and general
agency personnel. These benefits are provided through both qualified defined
benefit and defined contribution pension plans. In addition, through
nonqualified plans, the Company provides supplemental pension benefits to
employees with salaries and/or pension benefits in excess of the qualified plan
limits imposed by federal tax law. Pension benefits under the defined benefit
plans are based on years of service and average compensation generally during
the five years prior to retirement. Benefits related to the Company's defined
benefit pension plans paid to employees and retirees covered by annuity
contracts issued by the Company amounted to $102.2 million in 2000, $97.6
million in 1999, and $92.6 million in 1998. Plan assets consist principally of
listed equity securities, corporate obligations and U.S. government securities.
The Company's funding policy for qualified defined benefit plans is to
contribute annually an amount in excess of the minimum annual contribution
required under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). This amount
is limited by the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax
purposes. Because the qualified defined benefit plans are overfunded, no amounts
were contributed to these plans in 2000 or 1999. The funding policy for
nonqualified defined benefit plans is to contribute the amount of the benefit
payments made during the year. The projected benefit obligation and accumulated
benefit obligation for the non-qualified defined benefit pension plans, which
are underfunded, for which accumulated benefit obligations are in excess of plan
assets were $256.3 million, and $244.3 million, respectively, at December 31,
2000, and $257.4 million and $239.3 million, respectively, at December 31, 1999.
Non-qualified plan assets, at fair value, were $0.8 million and $1.0 million at
December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Defined contribution plans include The Investment Incentive Plan and the Savings
and Investment Plan. The expense for defined contribution plans was $10.2
million, $9.4 million, and $8.1 million, in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
In addition to the Company's defined benefit pension plans, the Company has
employee welfare plans for medical, dental, and life insurance covering most of
its retired employees and general agency personnel.
Substantially all employees may become eligible for these benefits if they reach
retirement age while employed by the Company. The postretirement health care and
dental coverages are contributory based on service for post January 1, 1992
non-union retirees. A small portion of pre-January 1, 1992 non-union retirees
also contribute. The applicable contributions are based on service.
The Company's policy is to fund postretirement benefits in amounts at or below
the annual tax qualified limits. As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, plan assets
related to non-union employees were comprised of an irrevocable health insurance
contract to provide future health benefits to retirees. Plan assets related to
union employees were comprised of approximately 60% equity securities and 40%
fixed income investments.
F-39
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 10 -- Pension Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans -
(Continued)
The changes in benefit obligation and plan assets related to the Company's
qualified and nonqualified benefit plans are summarized as follows:
Year Ended December 31
Other Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
----------------------- -----------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
-------- -------- -------- --------
(in millions)
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year ........ $1,967.6 $1,839.8 $ 443.2 $ 441.1
Service cost ................................... 36.8 35.7 7.8 7.5
Interest cost .................................. 134.1 121.2 31.4 28.7
Amendments ..................................... (10.3) 19.9 -- --
Actuarial (gain) loss .......................... (136.8) 32.6 36.4 (4.7)
Translation (gain) loss ........................ (1.5) 2.1 -- --
Benefits paid .................................. (113.6) (115.1) (32.0) (29.4)
Acquisition of subsidiary ...................... -- 44.6 6.5 --
Curtailment .................................... -- (13.2) -- --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Benefit obligation at end of year .............. 1,876.3 1,967.6 493.3 443.2
-------- -------- -------- --------
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning
of year ...................................... 2,476.5 2,251.1 232.9 215.2
Actual return on plan assets ................... 132.6 281.5 0.3 17.7
Employer contribution .......................... 12.6 11.5 35.5 --
Benefits paid .................................. (113.6) (108.4) (7.3) --
Translation (loss) gain ........................ (2.3) 3.5 -- --
Acquisition of subsidiary ...................... -- 50.2 -- --
Curtailment .................................... -- (12.9) -- --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Fair value of plan assets at end of year ....... 2,505.8 2,476.5 261.4 232.9
-------- -------- -------- --------
Funded status ..................................... 629.5 508.9 (231.9) (210.3)
Unrecognized actuarial gain ....................... (400.6) (366.0) (139.7) (182.8)
Unrecognized prior service cost ................... 24.2 39.1 (1.4) (1.6)
Unrecognized net transition asset ................. (6.3) (11.8) -- --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost, net ............... $ 246.8 $ 170.2 $ (373.0) $ (394.7)
======== ======== ======== ========
Amounts recognized in balance sheet consist of:
Prepaid benefit cost ........................ $ 396.4 $ 299.4
Accrued benefit liability ................... (243.5) (238.9)
Intangible asset ............................ 6.0 7.9
Accumulated other comprehensive
income .................................... 87.9 101.8
-------- --------
Prepaid benefit cost, net ......................... $ 246.8 $ 170.2
======== ========
F-40
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 10 -- Pension Benefits Plans and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans -
(Continued)
The assumptions used in accounting for the Company's qualified and nonqualified
benefit plans were as follows:
Year Ended December 31
Other Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
---------------- --------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ----
Discount rate...................................... 7.25% 7.00% 7.25% 7.00%
Expected return on plan assets .................... 9.00% 8.50% 9.00% 8.50%
Rate of compensation increase...................... 4.77% 4.77% 4.77% 4.77%
For measurement purposes, an 8.75% annual rate of increase in the per capita
cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2001. The rate was assumed
to decrease gradually to 5.25% in 2006 and remain at that level thereafter.
For the prior valuation, an 5.50% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost
of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2000. The rate was assumed to
decrease gradually to 5.25% in 2001 and remain at that level thereafter.
The net periodic benefit (credit) cost related to the Company's qualified and
nonqualified benefit plans includes the following components:
Year Ended December 31
Other Postretirement
Pension Benefits Benefits
-------------------------------- --------------------------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(in millions)
Service cost ............................... $ 36.8 $ 35.7 $ 34.6 $ 7.8 $ 7.5 $ 7.1
Interest cost .............................. 134.1 121.2 117.5 31.4 28.7 29.1
Expected return on plan assets ............. (217.4) (186.6) (168.5) (24.1) (18.3) (14.7)
Amortization of transition asset ........... (12.7) (12.1) (11.7) -- -- --
Amortization of prior service cost ......... 4.6 3.9 6.5 (0.2) (0.2) (0.3)
Recognized actuarial gain .................. (10.9) (8.1) (2.6) (8.8) (8.5) (7.8)
Other ...................................... -- (3.8) (1.2) -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Net periodic benefit (credit) cost .... $(65.5) $(49.8) $(25.4) $ 6.1 $ 9.2 $ 13.4
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts
reported for the healthcare plans. A one-percentage point change in assumed
health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
1-Percentage 1-Percentage
Point Increase Point Decrease
-------------- --------------
(in millions)
Effect on total of service and interest costs
in 2000......................................... $ 4.6 $ (2.2)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligations
as of December 31, 2000......................... 34.5 (29.9)
F-41
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 11 -- Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of its business operations, the Company is involved with
litigation from time to time with claimants, beneficiaries and others, and a
number of litigation matters were pending as of December 31, 2000. It is the
opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that the ultimate
liability with respect to these claims, if any, will not materially affect the
financial position or results of operations of the Company.
During 1997, the Company entered into a court-approved settlement relating to a
class action lawsuit involving certain individual life insurance policies sold
from 1979 through 1996. In entering into the settlement, the Company
specifically denied any wrongdoing. The reserve held in connection with the
settlement to provide for relief to class members and for legal and
administrative costs associated with the settlement amounted to $172.8 million
and $496.6 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Costs incurred
related to the settlement were $140.2 million and $230.8 million, in 1999 and
1998, respectively. No such costs were incurred in 2000. The estimated reserve
is based on a number of factors, including the estimated cost per claim and the
estimated costs to administer the claims.
During 1996, management determined that is was probable that a settlement would
occur and that a minimum loss amount could be reasonably estimated. Accordingly,
the Company recorded its best estimate based on the information available at the
time. The terms of the settlement agreement were negotiated throughout 1997 and
approved by the court on December 31, 1997. In accordance with the terms of the
settlement agreement, the Company contacted class members during 1998 to
determine the actual type of relief to be sought by class members. The majority
of the responses from class members were received by the fourth quarter of 1998.
The type of relief sought by class members differed from the Company's previous
estimates, primarily due to additional outreach activities by regulatory
authorities during 1998 encouraging class members to consider alternative
dispute resolution relief. In 1999, the Company updated its estimate of the cost
of claims subject to alternative dispute resolution relief and revised its
reserve estimate accordingly.
Given the uncertainties associated with estimating the reserve, it is reasonably
possible that the final cost of the settlement could differ materially from the
amounts presently provided for by the Company. The Company will continue to
update its estimate of the final cost of the settlement as the claims are
processed and more specific information is developed, particularly as the actual
cost of the claims subject to alternative dispute resolution becomes available.
However, based on information available at this time, and the uncertainties
associated with the final claim processing and alternative dispute resolution,
the range of any additional costs related to the settlement cannot be estimated
with precision.
Note 12 - Shareholder's Equity
(a) Common Stock
As result of the demutualization, as described in Note 1, the Company was
converted to a stock life insurance company and has one class of capital stock,
common stock ($10,000 par value, 1,000 shares authorized). All of the
outstanding common stock of the Company is owned by JHFS.
F-42
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 12 - Shareholder's Equity - (Continued)
b) Other Comprehensive Income
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
Net Foreign Accumulated
Unrealized Currency Minimum Other
Gains Translation Pension Comprehensive
(Losses) Adjustment Liability Income
---------- ----------- --------- -------------
(in millions)
Balance at January 1, 1998 ..................... $520.3 $(44.1) $(29.5) $446.7
Gross unrealized gains (losses) (net of
deferred income tax benefit of $56.7
million) .................................... (121.3) -- -- (121.3)
Less reclassification adjustment for
(gains) losses, realized in net
income (net of tax expense of
$61.4 million) .............................. (113.9) -- -- (113.9)
Participating group annuity contracts (net
of deferred income tax expense of $31.1
million) .................................... 57.7 -- -- 57.7
Adjustment to deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits
(net of deferred income tax expense of
$15.5 million) .............................. 28.9 -- -- 28.9
------ ------ ------ ------
Net unrealized gains (losses) .................. (148.6) -- -- (148.6)
Foreign currency translation adjustment ........ -- (6.0) -- (6.0)
Minimum pension liability (net of deferred
income tax benefit of $6.2 million) ......... -- -- (8.8) (8.8)
------ ------ ------ ------
Balance at December 31, 1998 ................... $371.7 $(50.1) $(38.3) $283.3
------ ------ ------ ------
F-43
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 12 -- Shareholder's Equity - (Continued)
Net Foreign Accumulated
Unrealized Currency Minimum Other
Gains Translation Pension Comprehensive
(Losses) Adjustment Liability Income
---------- ----------- --------- -------------
(in millions)
Balance at December 31, 1998 ................... $371.7 $(50.1) $(38.3) $283.3
Gross unrealized gains (losses) (net of
deferred income tax benefit of $275.6
million) .................................... (503.9) -- -- (503.9)
Less reclassification adjustment for
(gains) losses, realized in net
income (net of tax expense of
$5.4 million) ............................... (10.0) -- -- (10.0)
Participating group annuity contracts (net
of deferred income tax expense of $40.1
million) .................................... 74.6 -- -- 74.6
Adjustment to deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits
(net of deferred income tax expense of
$71.3 million) .............................. 132.3 -- -- 132.3
------ ------ ------ ------
Net unrealized gains (losses) .................. (307.0) -- -- (307.0)
Foreign currency translation adjustment ........ -- 16.9 -- 16.9
Minimum pension liability (net of deferred
income tax benefit of $12.3 million) ........ -- -- (22.9) (22.9)
------ ------ ------ ------
Balance at December 31, 1999 ................... $ 64.7 $(33.2) $(61.2) $(29.7)
------ ------ ------ ------
Gross unrealized gains (losses) (net of
deferred income tax expense of $37.1
million) .................................... 46.2 46.2
Less reclassification adjustment for
(gains) losses, realized in net
income (net of tax benefit of
$62.0 million) .............................. 115.2 115.2
Participating group annuity contracts (net
of deferred income tax benefit of $3.6
million) .................................... (6.8) (6.8)
Adjustment to deferred policy acquisition
costs and present value of future profits
(net of deferred income tax benefit of
$17.5 million) .............................. (32.6) (32.6)
------ ------ ------ ------
Net unrealized gains (losses) .................. 122.0 122.0
Foreign currency translation adjustment ........ (19.1) (19.1)
Minimum pension liability (net of deferred
income tax expense
of $4.4 million) ............................ 8.2 8.2
Minority interest .............................. (3.9) (0.6) (4.5)
------ ------ ------ ------
Balance at December 31, 2000 ................... $182.8 $(52.9) $(53.0) $ 76.9
====== ====== ====== ======
F-44
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 12 - Shareholder's Equity - (Continued)
Net unrealized investment gains (losses), included in the consolidated balance
sheets as a component of shareholder's equity, are summarized as follows:
Year Ended
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(in millions)
Balance, end of year comprises:
Unrealized investment gains (losses) on:
Fixed maturities ........................ $ 207.5 $(191.7) $ 730.6
Equity investments ...................... 265.3 144.0 239.0
Derivatives and other ................... (149.1) 110.8 (111.5)
------- ------- -------
Total ......................................... 323.7 63.1 858.1
Amounts of unrealized investment (gains) losses
attributable to:
Participating group annuity contracts ... (34.4) (24.0) (138.7)
Deferred policy acquisition cost and
present value of future profits ....... 10.0 60.1 (143.5)
Deferred federal income taxes ........... (112.6) (34.5) (204.2)
Minority interest ....................... (3.9) -- --
------- ------- -------
Total ......................................... (140.9) 1.6 (486.4)
------- ------- -------
Net unrealized investment gains ............... $ 182.8 $ 64.7 $ 371.7
======= ======= =======
C) Statutory Results
The Company and its domestic insurance subsidiaries prepare their
statutory-basis financial statements in accordance with accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by the state of domicile. Prescribed statutory
accounting practices include state laws, regulations and administrative rules,
as well as guidance published by the NAIC. Permitted accounting practices
encompass all accounting practices that are not prescribed by the sources noted
above. Since 1988, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Insurance has
provided the Company with approval to recognize the pension plan prepaid expense
in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 87, "Employers' Accounting for
Pensions." The Company furnishes the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of
Insurance with an actuarial certification of the prepaid expense computation on
an annual basis.
In addition, during 2000 and 1999, the Company received permission from the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Insurance to record its Asset
Valuation Reserve in excess of the prescribed maximum reserve level by $36.7
million and $48.0 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. There are
no other material permitted practices.
F-45
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 12 - Shareholder's Equity - (Continued)
Statutory net income and surplus include the accounts of the Company and its
variable life insurance subsidiary, John Hancock Variable Life Insurance
Company, including its wholly-owned subsidiary, Investors Partner Life Insurance
Company, and Investors Guaranty Life Insurance Company.
2000 1999 1998
--------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Statutory net income............. $ 617.6 $ 573.2 $ 627.3
Statutory surplus................ 3,700.5 3,456.7 3,388.7
Massachusetts has enacted laws governing the payment of dividends by insurers.
Under Massachusetts insurance law, no insurer may pay any shareholder dividends
from any source other than statutory unassigned funds without the prior approval
of the Massachusetts Division of Insurance. Massachusetts law also limits the
dividends an insurer may pay in any twelve month period, without the prior
permission of the Massachusetts Division of Insurance, to the greater of (i) 10%
of its statutory policyholders' surplus as of the preceding December 31 or (ii)
the individual company's statutory net gain from operations for the preceding
calendar year, if such insurer is a life company.
Note 13 -- Segment Information
The Company's reportable segments are strategic business units offering
different products and services. The reportable segments are managed separately,
as they focus on different products, markets or distribution channels.
Retail-Protection Segment. Offers a variety of individual life insurance and
individual and group long-term care insurance products, including participating
whole life, term life, universal life, variable life, and retail and group
long-term care insurance. Products are distributed through multiple distribution
channels, including insurance agents and brokers and alternative distribution
channels that include banks, financial planners, direct marketing and the
Internet.
Retail-Asset Gathering Segment. Offers individual annuities and mutual fund
products and services. Individual annuities consist of fixed deferred annuities,
fixed immediate annuities, single premium immediate annuities, and variable
annuities. Mutual fund products and services primarily consist of open-end
mutual funds, closed-end funds, and 401(k) services. This segment distributes
its products through distribution channels including insurance agents and
brokers affiliated with the Company, securities brokerage firms, financial
planners, and banks.
Institutional-Guaranteed and Structured Financial Products (G&SFP) Segment.
Offers a variety of retirement products to qualified defined benefit plans,
defined contribution plans and non-qualified buyers. The Company's products
include guaranteed investment contracts, funding agreements, single premium
annuities, and general account participating annuities and fund type products.
These contracts provide non-guaranteed, partially guaranteed, and fully
guaranteed investment options through general and separate account products. The
segment distributes its products through a combination of dedicated regional
representatives, pension consultants and investment professionals.
Institutional-Investment Management Segment. Offers a wide range of investment
management products and services to institutional investors covering a variety
of private and publicly traded asset classes including fixed income, equity,
mortgage loans, and real estate. This segment distributes its products through a
combination of dedicated sales and marketing professionals, independent
marketing specialists, and investment professionals.
F-46
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 13 -- Segment Information - (Continued)
Corporate and Other Segment. Primarily consists of the Company's international
insurance operations, certain corporate operations, and businesses that are
either disposed or in run-off. Corporate operations primarily include certain
financing activities, income on capital not specifically allocated to the
reporting segments and certain non-recurring expenses not allocated to the
segments. The disposed businesses primarily consist of group health insurance
and related group life insurance, property and casualty insurance and selected
broker/dealer operations.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. Allocations of net investment income
are based on the amount of assets allocated to each segment. Other costs and
operating expenses are allocated to each segment based on a review of the nature
of such costs, cost allocations utilizing time studies, and other relevant
allocation methodologies.
Management of the Company evaluates performance based on segment after-tax
operating income, which excludes the effect of net realized investment gains or
losses and unusual or non-recurring events and transactions. Segment after-tax
operating income is determined by adjusting GAAP net income for net realized
investment gains and losses, including gains and losses on disposals of
businesses and certain other items which management believes are not indicative
of overall operating trends. While these items may be significant components in
understanding and assessing the Company's financial performance, management
believes that the presentation of after-tax operating income enhances its
understanding of the Company's results of operations by highlighting net income
attributable to the normal, recurring operations of the business.
Amounts reported as segment adjustments in the tables below primarily relate to:
(i) certain realized investment gains (losses), net of related amortization
adjustment for deferred policy acquisition costs and amounts credited to
participating pension contractholder accounts (the adjustment for realized
investment gains (losses) excludes gains and losses from mortgage
securitizations and investments backing short-term funding agreements because
management views the related gains and losses as an integral part of the core
business of those operations); (ii) benefits to policyholders and expenses
incurred relating to the settlement of a class action lawsuit against the
Company involving certain individual life insurance policies sold from 1979
through 1996; (iii) restructuring costs related to our distribution systems,
retail operations and mutual fund operations; (iv) the surplus tax on mutual
life insurance companies which as a stock company is no longer applicable to the
Company; (v) a fourth quarter 1999 charge for uncollectible reinsurance related
to certain assumed reinsurance business; (vi) a fourth quarter 1999 charge for a
group pension dividend resulting from demutualization related asset transfers
and the formation of a corporate account; (vii) a charge for certain one time
costs associated with the demutualization process; and (viii) cumulative effect
of accounting change.
F-47
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 13 -- Segment Information - (Continued)
The following table summarizes selected financial information by segment for the
year ended or as of December 31 and reconciles segment revenues and segment
after-tax operating income to amounts reported in the consolidated statements of
income (in millions):
Retail
Retail Asset Institutional
2000 Protection Gathering G&SFP
---------- --------- -----
Revenues:
Segment revenues ............................. $ 1,529.7 $ 1,195.9 $ 2,409.4
Realized investment gains (losses), net ...... (18.2) 15.4 (64.7)
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues ..................................... $ 1,511.5 $ 1,211.3 $ 2,344.7
========= ========= =========
Net investment income ........................ $ 604.7 $ 445.8 $ 1,741.9
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ........... 252.2 128.8 211.6
Realized investment gains (losses), net ...... (11.5) 18.6 (40.5)
Restructuring charges ........................ (6.7) (1.4) (2.6)
Surplus tax .................................. 20.8 0.6 6.5
Demutualization expenses ..................... 1.6 0.4 0.4
Other demutualization related costs .......... (6.8) (1.3) (1.7)
Group pension dividend transfer .............. -- -- 5.7
--------- --------- ---------
Net income ................................... $ 249.6 $ 145.7 $ 179.4
========= ========= =========
Supplemental Information:
Inter-segment revenues ....................... -- -- --
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method .......... $ 7.5 $ 3.5 $ 11.2
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ........................... 55.6 78.8 2.6
Interest expense ............................. 1.1 3.5 --
Income tax expense ........................... 88.6 57.9 78.3
Segment assets ............................... 27,049.9 14,067.2 31,161.1
Net Realized Investment Gains Data:
Net realized investment (losses) gains ....... (34.3) 18.8 (57.8)
Add capitalization/less amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs
related to net realized investment
gains (losses) ............................. 4.4 (3.5) --
Less amounts credited to participating
pension contractholder accounts ............ -- -- (6.9)
--------- --------- ---------
Net realized investment (losses) gains,
net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and amounts
credited to participating pension
contractholders - per consolidated
financial statements ....................... (29.9) 15.3 (64.7)
Less realized investment (losses) gains
attributable to mortgage securitizations ... -- -- --
Net realized investment gains in the
closed block ............................... 11.7 -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment (losses) gains,
net-pre-tax adjustment made to
calculate segment operating income ......... (18.2) 15.3 (64.7)
Less income tax effect ....................... 6.7 3.3 24.2
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment (losses) gains,
net-after-tax adjustment made to
calculate segment operating income ......... $ (11.5) $ 18.6 $ (40.5)
========= ========= =========
Institutional
Investment Corporate
2000 Management and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ------------
Revenues:
Segment revenues ............................. $ 212.0 $ 1,707.6 $ 7,054.6
Realized investment gains (losses), net ...... 7.1 152.8 92.4
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues ..................................... $ 219.1 $ 1,860.4 $ 7,147.0
========= ========= =========
Net investment income ........................ $ 22.7 $ 435.9 $ 3,251.0
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ........... 46.8 104.0 743.4
Realized investment gains (losses), net ...... 4.4 93.5 64.5
Restructuring charges ........................ -- (1.3) (12.0)
Surplus tax .................................. -- 18.1 46.0
Demutualization expenses ..................... -- 0.1 2.5
Other demutualization related costs .......... -- (0.2) (10.0)
Group pension dividend transfer .............. -- -- 5.7
--------- --------- ---------
Net income ................................... $ 51.2 $ 214.2 $ 840.1
========= ========= =========
Supplemental Information:
Inter-segment revenues ....................... $ 39.1 $ (39.1) --
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method .......... 16.8 104.8 $ 143.8
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ........................... -- 46.8 183.8
Interest expense ............................. 12.1 46.7 63.4
Income tax expense ........................... 35.2 84.4 344.4
Segment assets ............................... 3,124.5 12,378.1 87,780.8
Net Realized Investment Gains Data:
Net realized investment (losses) gains ....... 10.3 152.9 89.9
Add capitalization/less amortization of
deferred policy acquisition costs
related to net realized investment
gains (losses) ............................. -- -- 0.9
Less amounts credited to participating
pension contractholder accounts ............ -- -- (6.9)
--------- --------- ---------
Net realized investment (losses) gains,
net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and amounts
credited to participating pension
contractholders - per consolidated
financial statements ....................... 10.3 152.9 83.9
Less realized investment (losses) gains
attributable to mortgage securitizations ... 3.2 -- 3.2
Net realized investment gains in the
closed block ............................... -- -- 11.7
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment (losses) gains,
net-pre-tax adjustment made to
calculate segment operating income ......... 7.1 152.9 92.4
Less income tax effect ....................... (2.7) (59.4) (27.9)
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment (losses) gains,
net-after-tax adjustment made to
calculate segment operating income ......... $ 4.4 $ 93.5 $ 64.5
========= ========= =========
F-48
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 13 -- Segment Information - (Continued)
Retail
Retail Asset Institutional
1999 Protection Gathering G&SFP
---------- --------- -----
Revenues:
Segment revenues .............................. $ 2,756.9 $ 1,057.3 $ 2,021.8
Realized investment gains (losses), net ....... 173.6 (11.0) 93.3
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues ...................................... $ 2,930.5 $ 1,046.3 $ 2,115.1
========= ========= =========
Net investment income ......................... $ 1,101.9 $ 388.6 $ 1,681.3
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ............ 188.7 115.1 201.7
Realized investment gains (losses), net ....... 108.6 (6.9) 58.4
Class action lawsuit .......................... -- -- --
Restructuring charges ......................... (8.6) (7.3) (0.6)
Surplus tax ................................... (12.5) (1.0) (6.5)
Workers' compensation reinsurance ............. -- -- --
Reserves
Group pension dividend transfer ............... -- -- (205.8)
Demutualization expenses ...................... (61.3) (13.0) (16.1)
Other demutualization related costs ........... (4.6) (0.9) (1.1)
Cumulative effect of accounting
change ...................................... -- (9.6) --
--------- --------- ---------
Net income .................................... $ 210.3 $ 76.4 $ 30.0
========= ========= =========
Supplemental Information:
Inter-segment revenues ........................ -- -- --
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method ........... $ 46.2 $ (0.3) $ 14.3
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ............................ 69.2 53.5 3.1
Interest expense .............................. 0.7 6.2 --
Income tax expense (credit) ................... 138.9 51.9 (7.5)
Segment assets ................................ 25,372.1 14,297.2 30,370.5
Net Realized Investment Gains Data:
Net realized investment gains (losses) ........ 228.4 (16.1) 97.4
Less amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs related to net realized
investment (losses) gains ................... (54.8) 5.1 --
Less amounts credited to participating
pension contractholder accounts ............. -- -- (35.3)
--------- --------- ---------
Net realized investment gains (losses),
net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and amounts
credited to participating pension
contractholders - per consolidated
financial statements ........................ 173.6 (11.0) 62.1
Less realized investment (losses) gains
attributable to mortgage securitizations
and investments backing short-term
funding agreements .......................... -- -- (31.2)
Less gain on sale of business ................. -- -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment gains (losses),
net-pre-tax adjustment made to
calculate segment operating income .......... 173.6 (11.0) 93.3
Less income tax effect ........................ (65.0) 4.1 (34.9)
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment gains (losses),
net-after-tax adjustment made to
calculate segment operating income .......... $ 108.6 $ (6.9) $ 58.4
========= ========= =========
Institutional
Investment Corporate
1999 Management and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ------------
Revenues:
Segment revenues .............................. $ 189.9 $ 1,310.5 $ 7,336.4
Realized investment gains (losses), net ....... 3.1 (56.1) 202.9
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues ...................................... $ 193.0 $ 1,254.4 $ 7,539.3
========= ========= =========
Net investment income ......................... $ 45.9 $ 350.8 $ 3,568.5
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ............ 37.3 67.8 610.6
Realized investment gains (losses), net ....... 2.0 (42.1) 120.0
Class action lawsuit .......................... -- (91.1) (91.1)
Restructuring charges ......................... -- (0.5) (17.0)
Surplus tax ................................... -- (2.2) (22.2)
Workers' compensation reinsurance ............. -- (133.7) (133.7)
Reserves
Group pension dividend transfer ............... -- -- (205.8)
Demutualization expenses ...................... -- (3.2) (93.6)
Other demutualization related costs ........... -- (0.2) (6.8)
Cumulative effect of accounting
change ...................................... (0.1) -- (9.7)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income .................................... $ 39.2 $ (205.2) $ 150.7
========= ========= =========
Supplemental Information:
Inter-segment revenues ........................ $ 43.6 $ (43.6) --
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method ........... 3.5 1.4 $ 65.1
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ............................ -- 38.4 164.2
Interest expense .............................. 5.3 57.9 70.1
Income tax expense (credit) ................... 26.5 (111.9) 97.9
Segment assets ................................ 3,531.4 11,017.2 84,588.4
Net Realized Investment Gains Data:
Net realized investment gains (losses) ........ 6.6 (55.3) 261.0
Less amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs related to net realized
investment (losses) gains ................... -- (0.8) (50.5)
Less amounts credited to participating
pension contractholder accounts ............. -- -- (35.3)
--------- --------- ---------
Net realized investment gains (losses),
net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and amounts
credited to participating pension
contractholders - per consolidated
financial statements ........................ 6.6 (56.1) 175.2
Less realized investment (losses) gains
attributable to mortgage securitizations
and investments backing short-term
funding agreements .......................... 3.5 -- (27.7)
Less gain on sale of business ................. -- (33.0) (33.0)
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment gains (losses),
net-pre-tax adjustment made to
calculate segment operating income .......... 3.1 (89.1) 169.9
Less income tax effect ........................ (1.1) 47.0 (49.9)
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment gains (losses),
net-after-tax adjustment made to
calculate segment operating income .......... $ 2.0 $ (42.1) $ 120.0
========= ========= =========
F-49
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 13 -- Segment Information - (Continued)
Retail
Retail Asset Institutional
Protection Gathering G&SFP
---------- --------- -----
1998
Revenues:
Segment revenues .............................. $ 2,667.6 $ 1,015.3 $ 1,731.2
Realized investment gains, net ................ 75.3 18.3 30.7
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues ...................................... $ 2,742.9 $ 1,033.6 $ 1,761.9
========= ========= =========
Net investment income ......................... $ 1,061.2 $ 378.0 $ 1,576.3
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ............ $ 166.1 $ 111.1 $ 145.7
Realized investment gains, net ................ 49.0 12.0 17.2
Class action lawsuit .......................... -- -- --
Surplus tax ................................... 11.7 0.3 2.0
Demutualization expenses ...................... (7.9) (1.8) (1.5)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income .................................... $ 218.9 $ 121.6 $ 163.4
========= ========= =========
Supplemental Information:
Inter-segment revenues ........................ -- -- --
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method ........... $ 54.9 -- $ 12.7
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ............................ 153.9 $ 46.8 3.7
Interest expense .............................. 0.3 8.5 --
Income tax expense (credit) ................... 82.1 61.5 67.9
Segment assets ................................ 25,684.2 12,715.7 29,315.2
Net Realized Investment Gains Data:
Net realized investment gains (losses) ........ 112.9 21.9 72.1
Less amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs related to net realized
investment (losses) gains ................... (37.6) (3.6) --
Less amounts credited to participating
pension contractholder accounts ............. -- -- (79.1)
--------- --------- ---------
Net realized investment gains (losses),
net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and amounts
credited to participating pension
contractholders - per consolidated
financial statements ........................ 75.3 18.3 (7.0)
Less realized investment (losses) gains
attributable to mortgage securitizations
and investments backing short-term
funding agreements .......................... -- -- (37.7)
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment gains, net-pre-tax
adjustment made to calculate segment
operating income ............................ 75.3 18.3 30.7
Less income tax effect ........................ (26.3) (6.3) (13.5)
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment gains, net-after-tax
adjustment made to calculate segment
operating income ............................ $ 49.0 $ 12.0 $ 17.2
========= ========= =========
Institutional
Investment Corporate
Management and Other Consolidated
---------- --------- ------------
1998
Revenues:
Segment revenues .............................. $ 143.9 $ 1,103.9 $ 6,661.9
Realized investment gains, net ................ 0.2 23.7 148.2
--------- --------- ---------
Revenues ...................................... $ 144.1 $ 1,127.6 $ 6,810.1
========= ========= =========
Net investment income ......................... $ 24.1 $ 288.4 $ 3,328.0
Net Income:
Segment after-tax operating income ............ $ 15.4 $ 56.3 $ 494.6
Realized investment gains, net ................ 0.1 15.4 93.7
Class action lawsuit .......................... -- (150.0) (150.0)
Surplus tax ................................... -- 1.5 15.5
Demutualization expenses ...................... -- (0.5) (11.7)
--------- --------- ---------
Net income .................................... $ 15.5 $ (77.3) $ 442.1
========= ========= =========
Supplemental Information:
Inter-segment revenues ........................ $ 34.3 $ (34.3) --
Equity in net income of investees
accounted for by the equity method ........... 0.9 1.5 $ 70.0
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs ............................ -- 45.3 249.7
Interest expense .............................. 7.0 60.9 76.7
Income tax expense (credit) ................... 10.7 (48.1) 174.1
Segment assets ................................ 3,439.6 5,792.5 76,947.2
Net Realized Investment Gains Data:
Net realized investment gains (losses) ........ (4.2) 23.7 226.4
Less amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs related to net realized
investment (losses) gains ................... -- -- (41.2)
Less amounts credited to participating
pension contractholder accounts ............. -- -- (79.1)
--------- --------- ---------
Net realized investment gains (losses),
net of related amortization of deferred
policy acquisition costs and amounts
credited to participating pension
contractholders - per consolidated
financial statements ........................ (4.2) 23.7 106.1
Less realized investment (losses) gains
attributable to mortgage securitizations
and investments backing short-term
funding agreements .......................... (4.4) -- (42.1)
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment gains, net-pre-tax
adjustment made to calculate segment
operating income ............................ 0.2 23.7 148.2
Less income tax effect ........................ (0.1) (8.3) (54.5)
--------- --------- ---------
Realized investment gains, net-after-tax
adjustment made to calculate segment
operating income ............................ $ 0.1 $ 15.4 $ 93.7
========= ========= =========
F-50
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED)
Note 13 -- Segment Information - (Continued)
The Company operates primarily in the United States, Canada and the Pacific Rim
(China, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand). The
following table summarizes selected financial information by geographic location
for the year ended or at December 31:
Income Before
Income Taxes, Minority
Interest and Cumulative
Long-Lived Effect of
Location Revenues Assets Assets Accounting Change
- ------------------------------------- -------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------------------
(in millions)
2000
United States.................... $5,823.7 $424.8 $77,978.9 $1,130.7
Canada........................... 1,078.6 30.4 9,357.8 58.5
Foreign - other.................. 244.7 3.4 444.1 5.9
-------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------------------
Total $7,147.0 $458.6 $87,780.8 $1,195.1
============== =============== =============== ==============================
1999
United States.................... $6,560.7 $440.0 $75,777.6 $211.7
Canada........................... 741.9 28.8 8,461.7 41.8
Foreign - other.................. 236.7 2.2 349.1 6.4
-------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------------------
Total $7,539.3 $471.0 $84,588.4 $259.9
============== =============== =============== ==============================
1998
United States.................... $6,069.5 $442.5 $71,725.1 $585.1
Canada........................... 512.0 24.9 4,941.6 30.2
Foreign - other.................. 228.6 2.1 280.5 2.0
-------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------------------
Total $6,810.1 $469.5 $76,947.2 $617.3
============== =============== =============== ==============================
The Company has no reportable major customers and revenues are attributed to
countries based on the location of customers.
F-51
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14 -- Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following discussion outlines the methodologies and assumptions used to
determine the fair value of the Company's financial instruments. The aggregate
fair value amounts presented herein do not represent the underlying value of the
Company and, accordingly, care should be exercised in drawing conclusions about
the Company's business or financial condition based on the fair value
information presented herein.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to determine the
fair values of financial instruments:
Fair values for publicly traded fixed maturities (including redeemable
preferred stocks) are obtained from an independent pricing service. Fair
values for private placement securities and fixed maturities not provided
by the independent pricing service are estimated by the Company by
discounting expected future cash flows using a current market rate
applicable to the yield, credit quality and maturity of the investments.
The fair value for equity securities is based on quoted market prices.
The fair value for mortgage loans on real estate is estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates adjusted to reflect the
credit characteristics of the loans. Mortgage loans with similar
characteristics and credit risks are aggregated into qualitative categories
for purposes of the fair value calculations. Fair values for impaired
mortgage loans are measured based either on the present value of expected
future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate or the
fair value of the underlying collateral for loans that are collateral
dependent.
The carrying amount in the balance sheet for policy loans, short-term
investments and cash and cash equivalents approximates their respective
fair values.
The fair value of the Company's long-term debt is estimated using
discounted cash flows based on the Company's incremental borrowing rates
for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Carrying amounts for
commercial paper and short-term borrowings approximate fair value.
Fair values for the Company's guaranteed investment contracts and funding
agreements are estimated using discounted cash flow calculations based on
interest rates currently being offered for similar contracts with
maturities consistent with those remaining for the contracts being valued.
The fair value for fixed-rate deferred annuities is the cash surrender
value, which represents the account value less applicable surrender
charges. Fair values for immediate annuities without life contingencies and
supplementary contracts without life contingencies are estimated based on
discounted cash flow calculations using current market rates.
The Company's derivatives include futures contracts, interest rate swap,
cap and floor agreements, swaptions, currency rate swap agreements and
equity collar agreements. Fair values for these contracts are based on
current settlement values. These values are based on quoted market prices
for the financial futures contracts and brokerage quotes that utilize
pricing models or formulas using current assumptions for all swaps and
other agreements.
The fair value for commitments approximates the amount of the initial
commitment.
F-52
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14 -- Fair Value of Financial Instruments - (Continued)
The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values of the
Company's financial instruments:
December 31
2000 1999
------------------------- -------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Value Value Value Value
--------- --------- --------- ---------
(in millions)
Assets:
Fixed maturities:
Held-to-maturity ............................ $11,888.6 $11,651.2 $13,790.2 $13,438.7
Available-for-sale .......................... 16,023.5 16,023.5 16,959.2 16,959.2
Equity securities:
Available-for-sale .......................... 1,094.9 1,094.9 1,230.2 1,230.2
Trading securities .......................... 231.6 231.6 84.1 84.1
Mortgage loans on real estate ................. 8,968.9 9,350.6 10,733.0 10,681.8
Policy loans .................................. 428.6 428.6 1,938.8 1,938.8
Short-term investments ........................ 151.9 151.9 166.9 166.9
Cash and cash equivalents ..................... 2,841.2 2,841.2 1,797.7 1,797.7
Liabilities:
Debt .......................................... 779.3 771.5 990.7 962.8
Guaranteed investment contracts and
funding agreements .......................... 14,333.9 13,953.8 13,109.3 12,709.1
Fixed rate deferred and immediate annuities ... 5,195.2 5,101.3 4,801.1 4,656.9
Supplementary contracts
Without life contingencies .................. 60.0 63.1 56.6 55.7
Derivatives assets/(liabilities) relating to:
Futures contracts, net ........................ (16.2) (16.2) 31.3 31.3
Interest rate swap agreements ................. (178.2) (176.1) 82.9 (18.3)
Interest rate swap CMT ........................ -- (5.2) -- --
Interest rate cap agreements .................. 2.2 2.2 5.8 5.8
Interest rate floor agreements ................ 59.0 59.0 0.1 0.1
Interest rate swaption agreements ............. (1.3) (1.3) (3.6) (3.6)
Currency rate swap agreements ................. 11.4 (461.6) 9.1 (48.3)
Equity collar agreements ...................... 11.7 11.7 53.0 53.0
Commitments ...................................... -- (1,843.9) -- (1,273.5)
Note 15 -- Stock Compensation Plans
On January 5, 2000, the Company, as sole shareholder of JHFS, approved and
adopted the 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan), which
originally had been approved by the Board of Directors of the Company on August
31, 1999. Under the Incentive Plan, which became effective on February 1, 2000,
the effective date of the Plan of Reorganization of the Company, options of JHFS
common stock granted may be either non-qualified options or incentive stock
options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Incentive
Plan objectives include attracting and retaining the best personnel, providing
for additional performance incentives, and promoting the success of the Company
by providing employees the opportunity to acquire JHFS's common stock.
F-53
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 15 -- Stock Compensation Plans - (Continued)
The maximum number of shares of JHFS common stock available under the Incentive
Plan is 5% of the total number of shares of common stock that were outstanding
following the IPO. In addition, no more than 4% of these shares shall be
available for awards of incentive stock options under the Incentive Plan, and no
more than 1% of these shares shall be available for stock awards, which includes
non-vested stock. The aggregate number of shares that may be covered by awards
for any one participant over the period that the Incentive Plan is in effect
shall not exceed 1% of these shares. Subject to these overall limits, there is
no annual limit on the number of stock options or stock awards that may be
granted in any one year.
The Incentive Plan has options exercisable at March 13, 2001 and 2002, June 12,
2001 and 2002, and August 14, 2001 and 2002. JHFS has granted 4.6 million
options to employees of the Company as of December 31, 2000. Options outstanding
under the Incentive Plan were granted at a price equal to the market value of
the stock on the date of grant, vest over a two-year period, and expire five
years after the grant date.
The status of JHFS stock options granted to employees of the Company under the
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan is summarized below as of December 31:
Number of shares Weighted-average
(in thousands) exercise price
---------------- ----------------
Outstanding at February 1, 2000 -- --
Granted 4,618.4 $ 14.06
Exercised 0.2 13.94
Canceled 311.6 13.94
------- -------
Outstanding at December 31, 2000 4,306.6 14.07
Options exercisable at:
March 13, 2001 2,125.3 13.94
June 12, 2001 6.3 23.37
August 14, 2001 21.7 23.75
March 13, 2002 2,125.3 13.94
June 12, 2002 6.3 23.37
August 14, 2002 21.7 23.75
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value
method prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, under which no compensation cost for
stock options is recognized for stock option awards granted at or above fair
market value. Had compensation expense for the Company's stock-based
compensation plan been determined based upon fair values at the grant dates for
awards under the plan in accordance with SFAS No. 123, the Company's net
earnings would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below.
Additional stock option awards are anticipated in future years.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating
fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because
the JHFS stock options granted to employees of the Company have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the
subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in
management's opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable
single measure of the fair value of the stock options.
The estimated weighted-average grant date fair value per share of stock options
granted during 2000 using the Black-Scholes option valuation model was $3.66.
The fair value of options granted in 2000 is estimated on the date of grant
using the following assumptions: dividend yield of 1.8%, expected volatility of
24%, risk-free interest rate range of 4.8% to 5.6% depending on grant date, and
an expected life ranging from 2 to 5 years.
F-54
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 15 -- Stock Compensation Plans - (Continued)
For the purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period. The Company's
pro forma information follows:
For the Period Year Ended December 31,
February 1 through 2000
December 31, 2000 Pro Forma (unaudited)
------------------ ---------------------
(in millions)
Net income:
As reported $796.1 $840.1
Pro forma (unaudited) 792.4 835.8
At December 31, 2000, JHFS had 4.3 million stock options outstanding to
employees of the Company with a weighted-average remaining contractual life of
4.2 years and a weighted-average exercise price of $14.07. As of December 31,
2000, there were 21,707 options exercisable, which represent grants to employees
of the Company who subsequently retired. Employees of the Company who retire
with outstanding options immediately vest and have a maximum of one year to
exercise.
On March 13, 2000, JHFS granted 291,028 shares of non-vested stock to key
personnel of the Company at a weighted-average grant price per share of $14.34.
These grants of non-vested stock are forfeitable and vest at three or five years
of service with the Company. The total grant-date exercise price of the
non-vested stock granted from February 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 is $4.2
million. During the third and fourth quarters of 2000, 50,837 shares of
non-vested stock were forfeited with a total grant date exercise price of $0.7
million.
Note 16-- Subsequent Events
On February 8, 2001, the Company signed letters of intent to reinsure 50% of the
business in the Closed Block, effective January 1, 2001. The effect of the
reinsurance will be to lower the Company's statutory risk based capital
requirements and to raise its statutory risk based capital ratio. This will
provide greater statutory capital flexibility for the Company. There will be no
effect on policyholder dividends, nor will the immediate effect on earnings be
material, as the reinsurance treaties will not meet the requirements of SFAS No.
113, "Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long
Duration Contracts." Final treaties with two reinsurers are expected to be
signed by the end of the first quarter of 2001. The reinsurance agreements
result in making several hundred million dollars in statutory capital available
for further business development or other purposes.
In March 2001, the Company announced the sale of the retirement plan
record-keeping business operated out of the mutual fund subsidiary of the
Company, John Hancock Funds. It is estimated that an after-tax charge of
approximately $9 million will be recorded in the first quarter of 2001 and that
the Company will initially sever 31 employees with additional severances
planned. The Company will continue to manage the assets of the business, the
purchaser will assume the record-keeping and support responsibilities.
F-55
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
SCHEDULE I -- SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS -
OTHER THAN INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES
excluding Closed Block
As of December 31, 2000
(in millions)
AMOUNT AT WHICH
SHOWN IN THE
CONSOLIDATED
TYPE OF INVESTMENT COST (2) VALUE BALANCE SHEET
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale:
Bonds:
United States government and government agencies ............. 243.2 247.9 247.9
and authorities
States, municipalities and political subdivisions ............ 126.6 126.7 126.7
Foreign governments .......................................... 1,386.4 1,453.8 1,453.8
Public utilities ............................................. 1,051.4 1,085.0 1,085.0
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached ................ 250.9 258.4 258.4
All other corporate bonds .................................... 12,123.4 12,263.9 12,264.0
Certificates of deposits ..................................... 0.0 0.0 0.0
Redeemable preferred stock ................................... 608.4 587.8 587.8
----------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale .......... 15,790.3 16,023.5 16,023.6
----------------------------------------------
Equity securities, available-for-sale:
Common stocks:
Public utilities ............................................. 4.7 5.5 5.5
Banks, trust and insurance companies ......................... 1.9 2.8 2.8
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other ...................... 703.1 968.9 968.9
Non-redeemable preferred stock ............................... 120.9 117.7 117.7
----------------------------------------------
Total equity securities, available-for-sale .................. 830.6 1,094.9 1,094.9
----------------------------------------------
Fixed maturity securities, held-to-maturity:
Bonds
United States government and government ...................... 32.5 33.2 32.5
agencies and authorities
States, municipalities and political subdivisions ............ 717.4 701.3 717.4
Foreign governments .......................................... 5.6 10.2 5.6
Public utilities ............................................. 973.2 901.3 973.2
Convertibles and bonds with warrants attached ................ 174.2 149.0 174.2
All other corporate bonds .................................... 9,985.7 9,856.2 9,985.7
Certificates of deposits ..................................... 0.0 0.0 0.0
Redeemable preferred stock ................................... 0.0 0.0 0.0
----------------------------------------------
Total fixed maturity securities, held-to-maturity ... 11,888.6 11,651.2 11,888.6
----------------------------------------------
F-56
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
SCHEDULE I -- SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS -
OTHER THAN INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES - (CONTINUED)
excluding Closed Block
As of December 31, 2000
(in millions)
AMOUNT AT WHICH
SHOWN IN THE
CONSOLIDATED
TYPE OF INVESTMENT COST (2) VALUE BALANCE SHEET
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity securities, trading:
Common stocks:
Public utilities 7.1 8.6 8.6
Banks, trust and insurance companies 14.9 24.6 24.6
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other 171.4 198.4 198.4
Non-redeemable preferred stock 0.0 0.0 0.0
----------------------------------------------
Total equity securities, trading 193.4 231.6 231.6
----------------------------------------------
Mortgage loans on real estate, net (1) 9,038.9 XXXX 8,968.9
Real estate, net:
Investment properties (1) 386.8 XXXX 373.6
Acquired in satisfaction of debt (1) 175.7 XXXX 145.4
Policy loans 428.6 XXXX 428.6
Other long-term investments (2) 1,353.0 XXXX 1,353.0
Short-term investments 151.9 XXXX 151.9
----------------------------------------------
Total investments 40,237.8 29,001.3 40,660.0
==============================================
(1) Difference from Column B is primarily due to valuation allowances due to
impairments on mortgage loans on real estate and due to accumulated depreciation
and valuation allowances due to impairments on real estate. See note 3 to the
audited consolidated financial statements.
(2) Difference from Column B is primarily due to operating gains (losses) of
investments in limited partnerships.
F-57
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
SCHEDULE III -- SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION
As of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the years then ended
(in millions)
FUTURE
POLICY OTHER
BENEFITS, POLICY
LOSSES, CLAIMS AND
DEFERRED POLICY CLAIMS AND UNEARNED BENEFITS PREMIUM
SEGMENT ACQUISITION COSTS LOSS EXPENSES PREMIUMS (1) PAYABLE (1) REVENUE
2000:
Protection $1,466.8 $ 4,814.4 $262.6 $ 33.5 $ 430.6
Asset Gathering 558.2 5,619.9 - (4.5) 63.4
Guaranteed & Structured
Financial Products 8.5 21,944.2 60.4 0.7 620.3
Investment Management - - - - -
Corporate & Other 355.0 6,471.6 348.3 224.0 1,076.1
-------- --------- ------ ------ --------
Total $2,388.5 $38,850.1 $671.3 $253.7 $2,190.4
-------- --------- ------ ------ --------
1999:
Protection $2,291.6 $15,035.0 $217.4 $112.1 $1,291.0
Asset Gathering 521.5 5,166.8 - 0.2 17.2
Guaranteed & Structured
Financial Products 8.4 20,310.4 56.1 0.5 298.2
Investment Management - - - - -
Corporate & Other 321.2 6,629.1 216.7 246.1 804.9
-------- --------- ------ ------ --------
Total $3,142.7 $47,141.3 $490.2 $358.9 $2,411.3
-------- --------- ------ ------ --------
1998:
Protection $2,017.6 $14,093.6 $219.5 $ 85.5 $1,262.5
Asset Gathering 425.2 4,850.0 - 0.2 19.8
Guaranteed & Structured
Financial Products 8.7 19,366.4 48.4 0.3 121.4
Investment Management - - - - -
Corporate & Other 251.0 3,865.0 105.9 800.3 705.3
-------- --------- ------ ------ --------
Total $2,702.5 $42,175.0 $373.8 $886.3 $2,109.0
-------- --------- ------ ------ --------
AMORTIZATION OF
DEFERRED POLICY
BENEFITS, ACQUISITION COSTS,
CLAIMS, EXCLUDING
NET LOSSES, AND AMOUNTS RELATED OTHER
INVESTMENT SETTLEMENT TO REALIZED OPERATING
SEGMENT INCOME EXPENSES INVESTMENT GAINS EXPENSES
2000:
Protection $ 604.8 $ 633.5 $ 55.5 $ 395.8
Asset Gathering 445.8 371.3 78.8 557.4
Guaranteed & Structured
Financial Products 1,741.9 1,963.5 2.6 77.5
Investment Management 22.7 - - 132.7
Corporate & Other 435.8 1,124.2 46.9 344.3
-------- -------- ------ --------
Total $3,251.0 $4,092.5 $183.8 $1,507.7
-------- -------- ------ --------
1999:
Protection $1,101.9 $1,595.0 $69.2 $401.2
Asset Gathering 388.6 299.3 53.5 542.1
Guaranteed & Structured
Financial Products 1,681.3 1,959.9 3.1 88.1
Investment Management 45.9 - - 127.2
Corporate & Other 350.8 1,278.8 38.4 225.8
-------- -------- ------ --------
Total $3,568.5 $5,133.0 $164.2 $1,384.4
-------- -------- ------ --------
1998:
Protection $1,061.2 $1,424.4 $165.4 $418.3
Asset Gathering 378.0 296.3 46.8 504.9
Guaranteed & Structured
Financial Products 1,576.3 1,411.5 3.7 92.6
Investment Management 24.1 - - 117.8
Corporate & Other 288.4 950.4 45.3 224.2
-------- -------- ------ --------
Total $3,328.0 $4,082.6 $261.2 $1,357.8
-------- -------- ------ --------
(1) Unearned premiums and other policy claims and benefits payable are
included in Column C amounts.
(2) Allocations of net investment income and certain operating expenses are
based on a number of assumptions and estimates, and reported operating
results would change by segment if different methods were applied.
F-58
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
SCHEDULE IV -- REINSURANCE
As of December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 and for each of the years then ended:
(in millions)
PERCENTAGE
CEDED TO ASSUMED OF AMOUNT
OTHER FROM OTHER ASSUMED TO
GROSS AMOUNT COMPANIES COMPANIES NET AMOUNT NET
2000
Life insurance in force $346,720.6 $91,827.1 $27,489.1 $282,382.6 9.7%
========== ========= ========= ========== ======
Premiums:
Life insurance $ 1,818.8 $ 370.6 $ 23.9 $ 1,472.1 1.6%
Accident and health insurance 1,338.6 1,061.5 441.2 718.3 61.4%
P&C - - - - 0.0%
---------- --------- --------- ---------- ------
Total $ 3,157.4 $ 1,432.1 $ 465.1 $ 2,190.4 21.2%
========== ========= ========= ========== ======
1999
Life insurance in force $380,019.3 83,232.3 $29,214.6 $326,001.6 9.0%
========== ========= ========= ========== ======
Premiums:
Life insurance $ 2,292.8 $ 468.5 $ 139.4 $ 1,963.7 7.1%
Accident and health insurance 1,142.4 868.2 173.1 447.3 38.7%
P&C - - 0.3 0.3 100.0%
---------- --------- --------- ---------- ------
Total $ 3,435.2 $ 1,336.7 $ 312.8 $ 2,411.3 13.0%
========== ========= ========= ========== ======
1998
Life insurance in force $324,597.7 $88,662.6 $29,210.1 $265,145.2 11.0%
========== ========= ========= ========== ======
Premiums:
Life insurance $ 1,871.9 $ 327.6 $ 221.0 $ 1,765.3 12.5%
Accident and health insurance 956.5 743.7 130.9 343.7 38.1%
P&C 7.1 9.0 1.9 - 0.0%
---------- --------- --------- ---------- ------
Total $ 2,835.5 $ 1,080.3 $ 353.8 $ 2,109.0 16.8%
========== ========= ========= ========== ======
Note: The life insurance caption represents principally premiums from
traditional life insurance and life-contingent immediate annuities and excludes
deposits on investment products and universal life insurance products.
F-59
3. Exhibits
EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------- -----------
2.1 Plan of Reorganization **
3.1 Restated Articles of Organization and Articles of Amendment of John
Hancock Life Insurance Company *
3.2 Amended and Restated By-laws of John Hancock Life Insurance Company *
10.1 Credit Agreement dated as of August 3, 2000, among John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc., John Hancock Life Insurance Company, John
Hancock Capital Corporation, The Banks listed therein, Fleet National
Bank, as Co-Administrative Agent, The Chase Manhattan Bank, as
Co-Administrative Agent, Citicorp USA, Inc., as Syndication Agent, and
BankOne, NA as Documentation Agent, and FleetBoston Robertson Stephens,
Inc., and Chase Securities, Inc., as Joint Book Managers and Joint Lead
Arrangers. ***
10.2 Amended and Restated Retention Agreement between John Hancock Life
Insurance Company and Kathleen M. Graveline. ****+
10.3 Fiscal Agency Agreement, dated as of February 25, 1994 by and between
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, as Issuer, and First
National Bank of Boston, as Fiscal Agent **
10.4 Reinsurance Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1992 by and between John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and Provident Life and Accident
Insurance Company **
10.5 Reinsurance Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1992 by and between John
Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and Provident Life and Accident
Insurance Company **
10.6 Coinsurance Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1997 by and between John
Hancock Financial Life Insurance Company and UNICARE Life & Health
Insurance Company **
10.7 Letter of Credit Agreement, dated as of January 2, 1997 by and among
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company, Banks named therein and
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York as Issuing Bank and Agent **
10.8 Long-Term Incentive Plan for Senior Executives @+
10.9 Form of Employment Continuation Agreement **+
10.10 Form of Stockholder Rights Agreement **+
10.11 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan **+
10.11.1 First Amendment to the 1999 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan **+
10.11.2 Incentive Compensation Plan For Employees @
10.12 Form of Note for Stock Ownership And Loan Program @@+
10.13 Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors @@+
10.14 Deferred Equity Rights Program for Non-Employee Directors @@+
10.15 Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives @+
24.1 Powers of Attorney *
Any exhibit not included with this Form 10-K when furnished to any shareholder
of record will be furnished to such shareholder upon written request and payment
of up to $.25 per page plus postage. Such requests should be directed to John
Hancock Financial Services, Inc., Investor Relations, John Hancock Place, Post
Office Box 111, Boston, Massachusetts 02117.
* Filed herewith
** Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s S-1 Registration Statement (file no. 333-87271), and
incorporated by reference herein.
*** Previously filed as Exhibit 10 to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2000, and incorporated by reference herein.
**** Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2000, and incorporated by reference herein.
@ Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s S-8 Registration Statement (file no. 333-55064), and
incorporated by reference herein.
@@ Previously filed as an exhibit to John Hancock Financial Services,
Inc.'s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2000, and incorporated by reference herein.
+ Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
There were no reports on Form 8-K required to be filed during the fourth quarter
of 2000.
(c) See Item 14 (a) 3.
(d) See Item 14 (a) 2.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
By: /s/ THOMAS E. MOLONEY
Thomas E. Moloney
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 23, 2001
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
*
- ------------------------------------
Stephen L. Brown Chairman of the Board and Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
David F. D'Alessandro President and Chief Executive March 23, 2001
Officer and Director
*
- ------------------------------------
Wayne A. Budd Executive Vice President, General March 23, 2001
Counsel and Director
*
- ------------------------------------
Foster L. Aborn Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
Samuel W. Bodman Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
I. MacAllister Booth Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
John M. Connors, Jr. Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
Robert E. Fast, Esq. Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
Dr. Kathleen Foley Feldstein Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
Nelson S. Gifford Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
Michael C. Hawley Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
Edward H. Linde Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
Judith A. McHale Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
Richard F. Syron Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
Robert J. Tarr, Jr. Director March 23, 2001
*
- ------------------------------------
R. Robert Popeo Director March 23, 2001
* By: /s/ THOMAS E. MOLONEY
------------------------------
Thomas E. Moloney
Attorney-in-Fact