Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
[ X ]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2004
[ ] TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
Commission
file number
0-27782
Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
11-3297463
(I.R.S.
employer identification number) |
209
Havemeyer Street, Brooklyn, NY
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
|
11211
(Zip
Code) |
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (718) 782-6200
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common
Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of
Class)
Preferred
Stock Purchase Rights
(Title of
Class)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file reports) and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the
past 90 days.
YES
X NO
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). YES X NO
As of
March 11, 2005, there were 37,166,048
shares of
the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding. The aggregate
market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of
June 30, 2004 was approximately $537.0 million. This figure is based upon the
closing price on the NASDAQ National Market for a share of the registrant’s
common stock on June 30, 2004, which was $17.48 as reported in the Wall Street
Journal on July 1, 2004.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the definitive Proxy Statement to be distributed on behalf of the Board of
Directors of Registrant in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to
be held on May 19, 2005 and any adjournment thereof, and are incorporated by
reference in Part III.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
Page |
PART
I |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
11 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
19 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
23 |
|
23 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
24 |
|
24 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
32 |
|
32 |
|
32 |
PART
II |
|
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
36 |
|
58 |
|
63 |
|
63 |
|
63 |
PART
III |
|
|
65 |
|
65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
67 |
|
67 |
PART
IV |
|
|
67 |
|
68 |
-2-
This Annual
Report on Form 10-K contains a number of forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These
statements may be identified by use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,”
“could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “outlook,” “plan,” “potential,”
“predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar terms and phrases,
including references to assumptions.
Forward-looking
statements are based upon various assumptions and analyses made by the Company
(as defined subsequently herein) in light of management’s experience and its
perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future
developments, as well as other factors it believes are appropriate under the
circumstances. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are
subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors (many of which are beyond the
Company’s control) that could cause actual results to differ materially from
future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
factors include, without limitation, the following:
· |
the
timing and occurrence or non-occurrence of events may be subject to
circumstances beyond the Company’s control;
|
· |
there
may be increases in competitive pressure among financial institutions or
from non-financial institutions; |
· |
changes
in the interest rate environment may reduce interest
margins; |
· |
changes
in deposit flows, loan demand or real estate values may adversely affect
the business of The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh (the
“Bank”); |
· |
changes
in accounting principles, policies or guidelines may cause the Company’s
financial condition to be perceived
differently; |
· |
changes
in corporate and/or individual income tax
laws; |
· |
general
economic conditions, either nationally or locally in some or all areas in
which the Company conducts business, or conditions in the securities
markets or the banking industry may be less favorable than the Company
currently anticipates; |
· |
legislation
or regulatory changes may adversely affect the Company’s
business; |
· |
technological
changes may be more difficult or expensive than the Company
anticipates; |
· |
success
or consummation of new business initiatives may be more difficult or
expensive than the Company anticipates; or |
· |
litigation
or other matters before regulatory agencies, whether currently existing or
commencing in the future, may delay the occurrence or non-occurrence of
events longer than the Company anticipates. |
The
Company has no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date of this document.
PART
I
Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. (the “Holding Company,” and together with its direct
and indirect subsidiaries, the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation and parent
company of the Bank (as defined above), a federally-chartered stock savings
bank. The Bank maintains its headquarters in the Williamsburg section of the
borough of Brooklyn, New York and operates twenty full-service retail banking
offices located in the New York City boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, and the
Bronx, and in Nassau County, New York.
The
Bank’s principal business has been, and continues to be, gathering deposits from
customers within its market area, and investing them primarily in multifamily
residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans, one- to four-family
residential mortgage loans, construction loans, consumer loans, mortgage-backed
securities (“MBS”), obligations of the U.S. Government and Government Sponsored
Entities (“GSEs”), and corporate debt and equity securities. The Bank’s revenues
are derived principally from interest on its loan and securities portfolios. The
Bank’s primary sources of funds are deposits; loan amortization, prepayments and
maturities; MBS amortization, prepayments and maturities; investment securities
maturities; advances (“Advances”) from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
(“FHLBNY”); securities sold under agreement to repurchase (“REPOS”); and the
sale of real estate loans to the secondary market.
The Holding
Company is a unitary savings and loan holding company, which, under existing
law, is generally not restricted as to the types of business activities in which
it may engage, provided that the Bank continues to be a qualified thrift lender
(“QTL”). The Holding Company’s primary business is the operation of its
wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank. Pursuant to regulations of the Office of
Thrift Supervision (“OTS”), the Bank is a QTL if its ratio of qualified thrift
investments to portfolio assets (“QTL Ratio”) was 65% or more, on a monthly
average basis, in nine of the previous twelve months. At December 31, 2004, the
Bank’s QTL Ratio was 77.6%, and the Bank maintained more than 65% of its
portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments throughout the year ended
December 31, 2004.
The
Holding Company neither owns nor leases any property but instead uses the
premises and equipment of the Bank. The Holding Company does not employ any
persons other than certain officers of the Bank who do not receive any
additional compensation as officers of the Holding Company. The Holding Company
utilizes the support staff of the Bank from time to time, as required.
Additional employees may be hired as deemed appropriate by Holding Company
management.
The
Company’s website address is www.dsbwdirect.com. The
Company makes available free of charge through its website, by clicking the
Investor Relations tab and selecting “SEC Filings,” its Annual and Transition
Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form
8-K, and amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after
such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
On July
18, 2002, the Boards of Directors of the Holding Company and each of its direct
and indirect subsidiaries other than DSBW Preferred Funding Corporation and DSBW
Residential Preferred Funding Corporation, approved changes in the fiscal year
end of each company from June 30th to
December 31st.
In order
to further assist in the interpretive reading of the statistical data presented
in Parts I and II of this Annual Report, management has elected to add
information related to the unaudited 12-month period ended December 31,
2002.
Acquisitions
On January
21, 1999, the Holding Company completed the acquisition of Financial Bancorp,
Inc., the holding company of Financial Federal Savings Bank, F.S.B (the “FIBC
Acquisition”). The FIBC Acquisition was accounted for as a purchase transaction,
generating $44.2 million of goodwill.
The Bank
has historically operated as, and intends to remain, a community-oriented
financial institution providing financial services and loans primarily for
multifamily housing within its market areas. The Bank maintains its headquarters
in the Williamsburg section of the borough of Brooklyn, New York, and operates
twenty full-service retail banking offices located in the New York City boroughs
of Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx, and in Nassau County, New York. The Bank
gathers deposits primarily from the communities and neighborhoods in close
proximity to its branches. The Bank’s primary lending area is the New York City
metropolitan area, although its overall lending area is much larger, extending
approximately 150 miles in each direction from its corporate headquarters in
Brooklyn. The majority of the Bank’s mortgage loans are secured by properties
located in its primary lending area, and approximately 75% of these loans are
secured by real estate properties located in the New York City boroughs of
Brooklyn, Queens and Manhattan.
The New
York City banking environment is extremely competitive. The Bank’s competition
for loans exists principally from other savings banks, commercial banks,
mortgage banks and insurance companies. The Bank has faced sustained competition
for the origination of multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans,
which together comprised 94% of the Bank’s loan portfolio at December 31, 2004.
Management anticipates that the current level of competition for multifamily
residential and commercial real estate loans will continue for the foreseeable
future, and this competition may inhibit the Bank’s ability to maintain its
current level of such loans.
The Bank
gathers deposits in direct competition with other savings banks, commercial
banks and brokerage firms, many among the largest in the nation. In addition, it
must also compete for deposit monies with the stock market and mutual funds,
especially during periods of strong performance in the equity markets. Over the
previous decade, consolidation in the financial services industry, coupled with
the emergence of Internet banking, has dramatically altered the deposit
gathering landscape. Facing increasingly larger and more efficient competitors,
the Bank’s strategy to attract depositors and originate loans has increasingly
utilized targeted marketing and delivery of technology-enhanced,
customer-friendly banking services while controlling operating
expenses.
This
competition occurs within an economic and financial marketplace that is largely
beyond the control of any individual financial institution. The interest rates
paid to depositors and charged to borrowers, while affected by marketplace
competition, are generally a function of broader-based macroeconomic and
financial factors, including the level of U.S. Gross Domestic Product, the
supply of, and demand for, loanable funds, and the impact of global trade and
international financial markets. Within this environment, the Federal Open
Market Committee’s (“FOMC’s”) monetary policy and governance of short-term rates
also significantly influence the interest rates paid and charged by financial
institutions.
The
Bank’s success is additionally impacted by the overall condition of the economy,
particularly in the New York City metropolitan area. As home to several national
companies in the financial and business services industries, and as a popular
destination for domestic travelers, the New York City economy is particularly
sensitive to the health of the national economy. Success in banking is more
easily achieved when local income levels increase due to economic strength. The
Bank has demonstrated that even in periods of intense competition, such as those
that existed during 2003 and 2004, it can succeed by effectively implementing
its business strategies. However, if the local market for multifamily
residential and commercial real estate declines, thereby potentially increasing
competitive pressures, the Bank may be unable to originate the volume of loans
that it otherwise anticipates.
Loan
Portfolio Composition. The
Bank’s loan portfolio consists primarily of mortgage loans secured by
multifamily residential apartment buildings, including buildings organized under
a cooperative form of ownership (“Underlying Cooperatives”); commercial
properties; real estate construction and land acquisition; and one- to
four-family residences, including condominiums and cooperative apartments. At
December 31, 2004, the Bank’s loan portfolio totaled $2.50 billion. Within the
loan portfolio, $1.92 billion, or 76.6%, were classified as multifamily
residential loans; $424.1 million, or 17.0%, were classified as commercial real
estate loans; $138.1 million, or 5.5%, were classified as one- to four-family
residential, including condominium or cooperative apartments; $4.2 million, or
0.2%, were loans to finance multifamily residential and one- to four-family
residential properties with full or partial credit guarantees provided by either
the Federal Housing Administration (‘’FHA’’) or the Veterans Administration
(‘’VA’’); and $15.6 million, or 0.6%, were loans to finance real estate
construction or land acquisition. Of the total mortgage loan portfolio
outstanding at that date, $2.00 billion, or 80.2%, were adjustable-rate loans
(‘’ARMs’’) and $489.4 million, or 19.8%, were fixed-rate loans. Of the Bank’s
multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans, over 80% were ARMs at
December 31, 2004, the majority of which were contracted to reprice no longer
than 7 years from their origination date and carry a total amortization period
of no longer than 30 years. At December 31, 2004, the Bank’s loan portfolio
additionally included $2.9 million in consumer loans, composed of passbook
loans, student loans, consumer installment loans, overdraft loans and mortgagor
advances.
The
following table sets forth the composition of the Bank’s real estate and other
loan portfolios (including loans held for sale) in dollar amounts and
percentages at the dates indicated:
|
At
December 31, |
|
At
June 30, |
|
2004 |
Percent
of Total |
2003 |
Percent
of Total |
2002 |
Percent
of Total |
|
2002 |
Percent
of
Total |
2001 |
Percent
of
Total |
2000 |
Percent
of
Total |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Real
Estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
residential |
$1,917,447 |
76.63% |
$1,734,904 |
79.07% |
$1,730,102 |
79.74% |
|
$1,694,422 |
79.92% |
$1,541,531 |
78.60% |
$1,349,854 |
78.33% |
Commercial
real estate |
424,060 |
16.95 |
309,810 |
14.12 |
265,485 |
12.23 |
|
243,694 |
11.49 |
196,503 |
10.02 |
118,576 |
6.88 |
One-
to four-family |
126,225 |
5.04 |
124,047 |
5.65 |
145,808 |
6.72 |
|
155,013 |
7.31 |
189,651 |
9.67 |
215,648 |
12.51 |
Cooperative
apartment |
11,853 |
0.47 |
13,798 |
0.63 |
16,451 |
0.76 |
|
17,766 |
0.84 |
22,936 |
1.17 |
27,465 |
1.59 |
FHA/VA
insured |
4,209 |
0.17 |
4,646 |
0.21 |
5,215 |
0.24 |
|
5,565 |
0.26 |
6,450 |
0.33 |
7,536 |
0.44 |
Construction
and land acquisition |
15,558 |
0.62 |
2,880 |
0.13 |
1,931 |
0.09 |
|
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Total
mortgage loans |
2,499,352 |
99.88 |
2,190,085 |
99.81 |
2,164,992 |
99.78 |
|
2,116,460 |
99.82 |
1,957,071 |
99.79 |
1,719,079 |
99.75 |
Other
loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student
loans |
61 |
0.00 |
295 |
0.01 |
420 |
0.02 |
|
502 |
0.03 |
827 |
0.04 |
990 |
0.06 |
Depositor
loans |
1,318 |
0.06 |
2,371 |
0.11 |
1,552 |
0.07 |
|
1,520 |
0.07 |
1,589 |
0.08 |
1,900 |
0.11 |
Consumer
installment and other |
1,537 |
0.06 |
1,406 |
0.07 |
2,781 |
0.13 |
|
1,715 |
0.08 |
1,729 |
0.09 |
1,348 |
0.08 |
Total
other loans |
2,916 |
0.12 |
4,072 |
0.19 |
4,753 |
0.22 |
|
3,737 |
0.18 |
4,145 |
0.21 |
4,238 |
0.25 |
Gross
loans |
2,502,268 |
100.00% |
2,194,157 |
100.00% |
2,169,745 |
100.00% |
|
2,120,197 |
100.00% |
1,961,216 |
100.00% |
1,723,317 |
100.00% |
Net
unearned costs (fees) |
(463) |
|
(1,517) |
|
332 |
|
|
57 |
|
(855) |
|
(2,017) |
|
Allowance
for loan losses |
(15,543) |
|
(15,018) |
|
(15,458) |
|
|
(15,370) |
|
(15,459) |
|
(14,785) |
|
Loans,
net |
$2,486,262 |
|
$2,177,622 |
|
$2,154,619 |
|
|
$2,104,884 |
|
$1,944,902 |
|
$1,706,515 |
|
Loans
serviced for others: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-
to four-family and
cooperative
apartment |
$29,524 |
|
$33,671 |
|
$34,683 |
|
|
$35,752 |
|
$42,175 |
|
$47,909 |
|
Multifamily
residential |
295,800 |
|
157,774 |
|
73,384 |
|
|
- |
|
63 |
|
281 |
|
Total
loans serviced for others |
$325,324 |
|
$191,445 |
|
$108,067 |
|
|
$35,752 |
|
$42,238 |
|
$48,190 |
|
-6-
Loan
Originations, Purchases, Sales and Servicing. The Bank
originates both ARMs and fixed-rate loans, depending upon customer demand and
market rates of interest. For the year ended December 31, 2004, total loan
originations were $1.02 billion. ARM originations were approximately 85% of
total loan originations during the same period. The majority of both ARM and
fixed-rate originations were multifamily residential and commercial real estate
loans. Multifamily residential real estate loans are either retained in the
Bank's portfolio or sold in the secondary market to the Federal National
Mortgage Association ("FNMA"). One- to four-family adjustable rate and
fixed-rate mortgage loans with maturities up to 15 years are retained for the
Bank’s portfolio. Generally, the Bank sells its newly originated one- to
four-family fixed-rate mortgage loans with maturities greater than fifteen years
in the secondary market to FNMA, the State of New York Mortgage Agency
("SONYMA") or private sector secondary market purchasers.
In
December 2002, the Bank entered into a multifamily seller/servicing agreement
with FNMA. Under the terms of this seller/servicing agreement, the Bank sells
multifamily residential loans to FNMA. The majority of the loans sold under this
seller/servicer agreement during 2002, 2003 and 2004 possessed a minimum term to
maturity or repricing of seven years. In December 2002, the Bank sold
approximately $73.4 million of multifamily residential loans to FNMA. During the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Bank sold $164.9 million and $87.1
million, respectively, of such loans to FNMA.
The Bank
currently has no arrangement in which it sells commercial real estate loans to
the secondary market. During the year ended December 31, 2004, sales of
fixed-rate one- to four-family mortgage loans totaled $2.6 million.
The Bank
generally retains the servicing rights in connection with loans it sells in the
secondary market. As of December 31, 2004, the Bank was servicing $325.3 million
of loans for non-related institutions. The Bank generally receives a loan
servicing fee equal to 0.25% of the outstanding principal balance on all loans
other than multifamily residential loans sold to FNMA. The loan servicing fees
received on multifamily residential loans sold to FNMA vary as they are derived
based upon the difference between the actual origination rate and contractual
pass-through rate of the loans sold at the time of sale. At December 31, 2004,
the Bank had recorded mortgage servicing rights ("MSR") of $2.5 million
associated with the sale of multifamily residential loans.
The
following table sets forth the Bank's loan originations (including loans held
for sale), sales, purchases and principal repayments for the periods
indicated:
|
For
the Year Ended
December
31, |
|
For
the Six Months Ended December 31, |
|
For
the Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
beginning of period |
$2,194,157 |
$2,169,745 |
$2,055,825 |
|
$2,120,197 |
$1,961,216 |
|
$1,961,216 |
$1,723,317 |
$1,386,194 |
Real
estate loans originated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
residential |
774,832 |
917,904 |
616,276 |
|
358,137 |
242,433 |
|
504,770 |
355,804 |
453,682 |
Commercial
real estate |
187,655 |
126,185 |
56,063 |
|
39,542 |
15,280 |
|
27,900 |
37,591 |
28,824 |
One-
to four-family (1) |
36,363 |
28,259 |
18,846 |
|
19,969 |
3,608 |
|
16,343 |
2,346 |
3,165 |
Cooperative
apartment |
1,048 |
1,839 |
1,469 |
|
956 |
861 |
|
1,208 |
1,245 |
744 |
Equity
lines of credit |
6,488 |
21,469 |
19,535 |
|
4,961 |
690 |
|
1,676 |
- |
- |
Construction |
6,844 |
4,549 |
805 |
|
805 |
- |
|
620 |
1,339 |
24 |
Total
mortgage loans originated |
1,013,230 |
1,100,205 |
712,994 |
|
424,370 |
262,872 |
|
552,517 |
398,325 |
486,439 |
Other
loans originated |
3,166 |
3,866 |
3,997 |
|
2,159 |
2,593 |
|
3,410 |
8,585 |
8,937 |
Total
loans originated |
1,016,396 |
1,104,071 |
716,991 |
|
426,529 |
265,465 |
|
555,927 |
406,910 |
495,376 |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
repayments |
540,827 |
976,779 |
521,880 |
|
298,181 |
168,808 |
|
392,507 |
166,948 |
156,306 |
Loans
sold (2) |
167,458 |
102,880 |
81,191 |
|
78,800 |
1,914 |
|
4,305 |
1,835 |
1,518 |
Mortgage
loans transferred to
Other Real Estate Owned |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
134 |
|
134 |
228 |
429 |
Gross
loans at end of period |
$2,502,268 |
$2,194,157 |
$2,169,745 |
|
$2,169,745 |
$2,055,825 |
|
$2,120,197 |
$1,961,216 |
$1,723,317 |
(1) Includes
Home Equity and Home Improvement Loans.
(2) Includes
multifamily residential loans sold to FNMA, fixed-rate one- to four-family
mortgage loans and student loans.
Loan
Maturity and Repricing. The
following table shows the earlier of the maturity or the repricing period of the
Bank's loan portfolio (including loans held for sale) at December 31, 2004. ARMs
are shown as being due in the period during which the interest rates are next
scheduled to adjust. The table does not include prepayments or scheduled
principal amortization. Scheduled loan repricing and estimated prepayment and
amortization information is presented on an aggregate basis for loans in "Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
- - Interest Sensitivity Gap."
-7-
|
At
December 31, 2004 |
|
Real
Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
Residential |
Commercial
Real
Estate |
One-
to Four-
Family |
Cooperative
Apartment |
FHA/VA
Insured |
Construction |
|
Other
Loans |
Total
Loans |
(Dollars
In Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
due: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
year or less |
$25,807 |
$13,202 |
$39,722 |
$7,720 |
$47 |
$15,558 |
|
$2,916 |
$104,972 |
After
one year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More
than one year to
three years |
183,953 |
30,862 |
6,431 |
790 |
- |
- |
|
- |
222,036 |
More
than three years
to seven years |
1,436,574 |
298,885 |
21,258 |
669 |
- |
- |
|
- |
1,757,386 |
More
than seven years
to ten years |
180,870 |
38,151 |
21,193 |
986 |
2,830 |
- |
|
- |
244,030 |
More
than ten years to
twenty years |
90,061 |
42,960 |
27,848 |
1,688 |
1,332 |
- |
|
- |
163,889 |
Over
twenty years |
182 |
- |
9,773 |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
9,955 |
Total
due or repricing
after one year |
1,891,640 |
410,858 |
86,503 |
4,133 |
4,162 |
- |
|
- |
2,397,296 |
Total
amounts due or
repricing, gross |
$1,917,447 |
$424,060 |
$126,225 |
$11,853 |
$4,209 |
$15,558 |
|
$2,916 |
$2,502,268 |
The
following table sets forth the outstanding principal balances in each loan
category (including loans held for sale) at December 31, 2004 that are due to
mature or reprice after December 31, 2005, and whether such loans have fixed or
adjustable interest rates:
|
Due
after December 31, 2005 |
|
Fixed |
Adjustable |
Total |
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Mortgage
loans: |
|
|
|
Multifamily
residential |
$311,717 |
$1,579,923 |
$1,891,640 |
Commercial
real estate |
90,483 |
320,375 |
410,858 |
One-
to four-family |
65,566 |
20,937 |
86,503 |
Cooperative
apartment |
2,844 |
1,289 |
4,133 |
Construction |
- |
- |
- |
FHA/VA
insured |
4,162 |
- |
4,162 |
Other
loans |
- |
- |
- |
Total
loans |
$474,772 |
$1,922,524 |
$2,397,296 |
Multifamily
Residential Lending and Commercial Real Estate Lending. The
majority of the Bank's lending activities consist of originating adjustable-rate
and fixed-rate multifamily residential (five or more residential units),
Underlying Cooperative and commercial real estate loans. The properties securing
these loans are generally located in the Bank's primary lending area. At
December 31, 2004, the Bank had multifamily residential loans totaling $1.92
billion in its portfolio, comprising 76.6% of the gross loan portfolio. Of the
Bank’s multifamily residential loans, $1.70 billion, or 88.6%, were secured by
apartment buildings and $219.2 million, or 11.4%, were secured by Underlying
Cooperatives at December 31, 2004. The Bank also had $424.1 million of
commercial real estate loans in its portfolio at December 31, 2004, representing
17.0% of its total loan portfolio.
The Bank
originated multifamily residential, Underlying Cooperative, and commercial real
estate loans totaling $962.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2004 and
$1.04 billion during the year ended December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004, the
Bank had $52.3 million of commitments accepted by borrowers to originate
multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans, compared to $89.7
million outstanding at December 31, 2003.
At
December 31, 2004, multifamily residential, Underlying Cooperative and
commercial real estate loans originated by the Bank were secured by three
distinct property types: (1) fully residential apartment buildings; (2)
"mixed-use" properties featuring a combination of residential units and
commercial units within the same building; and (3) fully commercial real estate
buildings. The underwriting procedures for each of these property types are
substantially similar. Loans secured by fully residential apartment buildings
are classified by the Bank as multifamily residential loans in all instances.
Loans secured by fully commercial real estate buildings are classified as
commercial real estate loans in all instances. Loans secured by mixed-use
properties may be classified as either multifamily residential or commercial
real estate loans based upon the percentage of the property's rental income that
is received from its residential tenants compared to its commercial tenants. If
50% or more of the rental income is received from residential tenants, the full
balance of the loan is classified
-8-
as
multifamily residential. If less than 50% of the rental income is received from
residential tenants, the full balance of the loan is classified as commercial
real estate. At December 31, 2004, mixed use properties classified as
multifamily residential or commercial real estate loans totaled $809.2
million.
Multifamily
residential loans are generally viewed as exposing the Bank to a greater risk of
loss than one- to four-family residential loans and typically involve higher
loan principal amounts. Multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans
in the Bank's portfolio generally range in amount from $250,000 to $4.0 million,
and, at December 31, 2004, had an average loan size of approximately $1.2
million and a median loan balance of $749,000. Multifamily residential loans in
this range are generally secured by buildings that possess between 5 and 100
apartments. The Bank had a total of $1.84 billion of multifamily residential
loans in its portfolio secured by buildings with under 100 units as of
December 31, 2004. Principally as a result of New York City rent
control and rent stabilization laws which limit the amount of rent that may be
charged to tenants, the associated rent rolls for buildings of this type
indicate a rent range that would be considered affordable for low- to
moderate-income households, regardless of the household income profiles of the
associated census tracks.
At
December 31, 2004, the Bank had 305 multifamily residential and commercial real
estate loans with principal balances greater than $2.0 million, totaling $1.10
billion. These loans, while underwritten to the same standards as all other
multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans, tend to expose the
Bank to a higher degree of risk due to the potential impact of losses from any
one loan relative to the size of the Bank's capital position.
The
typical adjustable-rate multifamily residential and commercial real estate loan
carries a final maturity of 10 or 12 years, and an amortization period not
exceeding 30 years. These loans generally have an interest rate that adjusts
once after the fifth or seventh year, indexed to the 5-year FHLBNY advance rate
(plus a spread typically approximating 225 basis points), but may not adjust
below the initial interest rate of the loan. Prepayment fees are assessed
throughout the life of the loans. The Bank also offers fixed-rate,
self-amortizing, multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans with
maturities of up to fifteen years.
It is the
Bank's policy to require appropriate insurance protection, including title and
hazard insurance, on all real estate mortgage loans at closing. Borrowers
generally are required to advance funds for certain expenses such as real estate
taxes, hazard insurance and flood insurance.
The
underwriting standards for new multifamily residential loans generally require
(1) a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 75% based upon an appraisal performed by an
independent, state licensed appraiser, and (2) sufficient cash flow from the
underlying property to adequately service the debt, represented by a minimum
debt service ratio of 120%. The Bank may additionally require environmental
hazard reports. The Bank further considers the borrower's experience in owning
or managing similar properties, the value of the collateral based upon the
income approach, and the Bank's lending experience with the borrower. Where
appropriate, the Bank utilizes rent or lease income and the borrower's credit
history and business experience when underwriting multifamily real estate
applications. (See "Item 1 - Business - Lending
Activities - Loan Approval Authority and Underwriting" for a discussion of
the Bank's underwriting procedures utilized in originating multifamily
residential loans).
Repayment
of multifamily residential loans is dependent, in large part, on cash flow from
the collateral property sufficient to satisfy operating expenses and debt
service. Economic events and government regulations, such as rent control and
rent stabilization laws, which are outside the control of the borrower or the
Bank, could impair the future cash flow of such properties. As a result, rental
income might not rise sufficiently over time to satisfy increases in the loan
rate at repricing or in overhead expenses (e.g.,
utilities, taxes, insurance).
During
the period July 1, 1999 through December 31, 2004, the Bank's charge-offs
related to its multifamily residential loan portfolio totaled $113,000, or
0.006% of the total of such loans outstanding at December 31, 2004. As of
December 31, 2004, the Bank had two non-performing multifamily residential loans
totaling $830,000. (See Item 1 - Business - "Asset
Quality" and "Allowance for Loan
Losses.")
The
Bank's three largest multifamily residential loans at December 31, 2004 were a
$24.5 million loan originated in March 2004 secured by an eight-story, mixed use
building containing 137 residential apartments and 4 commercial units and
located in Flushing, New York; a $15.0 million loan originated in December 2003
secured by a nine story building in Manhattan, New York, containing 159 loft
cooperative apartments; and a $13.0 million loan originated in December 2004
secured by ten adjacent, mixed use buildings ranging between one and five
stories located in Manhattan, New York.
The
underwriting standards for new commercial real estate loans generally require a
maximum loan-to-value ratio of 65% and sufficient cash flow from the underlying
property to adequately service the debt, represented by a minimum debt service
ratio of 120%. To originate commercial real estate loans, the Bank requires a
security interest in the personal property associated with the collateral, and
standby assignments of rents and leases in addition to the security interest in
the underlying property.
-9-
Commercial
real estate loans are generally viewed as exposing the Bank to a greater risk of
loss than both one- to four-family and multifamily residential mortgage loans.
Because payment of loans secured by commercial real estate often is dependent
upon successful operation and management of the collateral property,
satisfaction of such loans may be subject, to a greater extent, to adverse
conditions in the real estate market or economy. The Bank seeks to minimize
these risks by obtaining personal guarantees, if possible. The Bank utilizes,
where appropriate, rent or lease income, the borrower's credit history and
business experience, and valuation determined under the income approach when
underwriting commercial real estate loan applications. (See Item 1 - Business - "Lending Activities - Loan
Approval Authority and Underwriting" for a discussion of the Bank's
underwriting procedures utilized in originating commercial real estate
loans).
During
the period July 1, 1999 through December 31, 2004, the Bank's charge-offs
related to its commercial real estate loan portfolio totaled $6,000, or 0.001%
of the total of such loans outstanding as of December 31, 2004. As of December
31, 2004, the Bank had no non-performing commercial real estate loans (See Item
1 - Business - "Asset Quality" and "Allowance for Loan Losses").
The
Bank's three largest commercial real estate loans at December 31, 2004 were a
$12.0 million loan originated in July 2004 secured by five-story mixed-use
building located in Manhattan, New York, containing 30 residential apartments
and 10 commercial units; a $9.4 million loan originated in April 2004 secured by
a four story office building and parking facility located in Garden City, New
York containing 22 commercial tenants; and an $8.9 million loan originated in
January 2003 secured by a 17-story loft building in Manhattan, New York
containing 63 commercial tenants.
One-
to Four-Family Residential and Cooperative Apartment Lending. The Bank
offers residential first and second mortgage loans secured primarily by
owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences, including condominium and
cooperative apartments. The majority of one- to four-family loans in the Bank's
loan portfolio were obtained through the FIBC Acquisition and the acquisition of
Pioneer Savings Bank, F.S.B. in 1996. The Bank originated $37.4 million of one-
to four-family mortgages during the year ended December 31, 2004, the majority
of which were home equity and home improvement loans. At December 31, 2004,
$138.1 million, or 5.5%, of the Bank's loans consisted of one- to four-family
residential and cooperative apartment loans. The Bank is a participating
seller/servicer with two government-sponsored mortgage agencies: FNMA and
SONYMA, and generally underwrites its one- to four-family residential mortgage
loans to conform with standards required by those agencies.
Although
the collateral for cooperative apartment loans is composed of shares in a
cooperative corporation (i.e., a
corporation whose primary asset is the underlying building) and a proprietary
lease in the borrower's apartment, cooperative apartment loans are treated as
one- to four-family loans. The Bank's portfolio of cooperative apartment loans
was $11.9 million, or 0.5% of total loans, as of December 31, 2004.
Adjustable-rate cooperative apartment loans continue to be originated for
portfolio.
For all
one- to four-family loans originated by the Bank, upon receipt of a completed
loan application from a prospective borrower: (1) a credit report is reviewed;
(2) income, assets and certain other information are verified by an independent
credit agency; (3) if necessary, additional financial information is required of
the borrower; and (4) an appraisal of the real estate intended to secure the
proposed loan is obtained from an independent appraiser approved by the Board of
Directors.
During
the period July 1, 1999 through December 31, 2004, the Bank's charge-offs
related to its one- to four-family and cooperative apartment loan portfolio
totaled $707,000. As of December 31, 2004, the Bank had non-performing one- to
four-family loans totaling $475,000 (See Item 1 - Business - "Asset Quality" and "Allowance
for Loan Losses").
The Bank
generally sells its newly originated conforming fixed-rate one- to four-family
mortgage loans with maturities in excess of 15 years in the secondary market to
FNMA and SONYMA, and its non-conforming fixed-rate one- to four-family mortgage
loans with maturities in excess of 15 years to various private sector secondary
market purchasers. With few exceptions, such as SONYMA, the Bank retains the
servicing rights on all such loans sold. During the year ended December 31,
2004, the Bank sold one- to four-family mortgage loans totaling $2.6 million to
non-affiliates. As of December 31, 2004, the Bank's portfolio of one- to
four-family fixed-rate mortgage loans serviced for others totaled $29.5 million.
Home
Equity and Home Improvement Loans. Home
equity loans and home improvement loans, the majority of which are included in
one- to four-family loans, are originated to a maximum of $250,000. At the time
of origination, the combined balance of the first mortgage and home equity or
home improvement loan may not exceed the following limitations: (1) 89% of the
appraised value of the collateral property at origination of the home equity or
home improvement loan in the event that the Bank holds the first mortgage on the
collateral property; or (2) 85% of the appraised value of the collateral
property at origination of the home equity or home improvement loan in the event
that the Bank does not hold the first
mortgage
on the collateral property. On home equity and home improvement loans, the
borrower pays an initial interest rate that may be as low as 200 basis points
below the prime rate of interest in effect at origination. After six months, the
interest rate adjusts and ranges from the prime interest rate in effect at the
time to 100 basis points above the prime interest rate in effect at the time.
The combined outstanding balance of the Bank's home equity and home improvement
loans was $31.4 million at December 31, 2004.
Equity
credit is also available on multifamily residential and commercial real estate
loans. These loans are underwritten in the same manner as first mortgage loans
on these properties, except that the combined loan-to-value ratio of the first
mortgage and the equity line cannot exceed 75%. On equity loans, the borrower
pays, based upon the loan-to-value ratio of the underlying collateral at the
time of origination, an interest rate generally ranging from 100 to 200 basis
points above the prime rate. The outstanding balance of these equity loans was
less than $6.5 million at December 31, 2004, on outstanding total lines of $20.7
million.
Loan Approval Authority and Underwriting.
The Board
of Directors of the Bank establishes lending authorities for individual officers
as to the various types of loan products. In addition, the Bank maintains a Loan
Operating Committee which possess collective loan approval authority. The Loan
Operating Committee is composed of, at a minimum, the Chief Executive Officer,
President, Chief Financial Officer, and a credit officer overseeing the
underwriting function for the respective type of loan being originated. The Loan
Operating Committee has authority to approve loan originations in amounts up to
$3.0 million. Both the Loan Operating Committee and the Board of Directors must
approve all loan originations exceeding $3.0 million. All loans approved by the
Loan Operating Committee are presented to the Board of Directors for its review.
In addition, regulatory restrictions imposed on the Bank's lending activities
limit the amount of credit that can be extended to any one borrower to 15% of
unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus (See
Item 1 - Business - ''Regulation - Regulation of Federal Savings Associations -
Loans to One Borrower'').
Non-performing
loans (i.e.,
delinquent loans for which interest accruals have ceased in accordance with the
Bank's policy discussed below - typically loans 90 days or more past due)
totaled $1.5 million and $525,000 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The increase in non-performing loans during the year resulted primarily from the
addition of six loans totaling $1.1 million to nonaccrual status, which was
partially offset by the removal of one loan totaling $99,000 from nonaccrual
status. In addition, the largest single nonaccrual loan at December 31, 2004,
which possessed an outstanding principal balance of $446,000, was removed from
nonaccrual status in January 2005.
Accrual
of interest is discontinued when its receipt is in doubt, which typically occurs
when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest. When interest
accruals are discontinued, any interest accrued to income in the current year is
reversed. Payments on nonaccrual loans are generally applied to principal.
Management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when a loan is in the
process of collection and the estimated fair value of the collateral is
sufficient to satisfy the principal balance and accrued interest. Loans are
returned to accrual status once the doubt concerning collectibility has been
removed and the borrower has demonstrated performance in accordance with the
loan terms and conditions for a period of at least twelve months. The Bank had
no loans that were 90 days past due and accruing interest at December 31, 2004,
2003, or 2002 or at June 30, 2002, 2001 or 2000.
The Bank
had a total of 10 real estate and consumer loans, totaling $754,000, delinquent
60-89 days at December 31, 2004, compared to a total of 30 such delinquent
loans, totaling $1.4 million, at December 31, 2003. The majority of the dollar
amount of both non-performing loans and loans delinquent 60-89 days was composed
of real estate loans. The majority of the count of both non-performing loans and
loans delinquent 60-89 days was composed of consumer loans (primarily depositor
loans). The decrease in the amount delinquent 60-89 days from December 31, 2003
to December 31, 2004 resulted from a net decrease of $799,000 of delinquent real
estate loans during the period. The 60-89 day delinquency levels fluctuate
monthly, and are generally considered a less accurate indicator of credit
quality trends than non-performing loans.
Under
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
("GAAP"), the Bank is required to account for certain loan modifications or
restructurings as ''troubled-debt restructurings.'' In general, the modification
or restructuring of a loan constitutes a troubled-debt restructuring if the
Bank, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial
difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise
consider. Current regulations of the OTS require that troubled-debt
restructurings remain classified as such until either the loan is repaid or
returns to its original terms. The Bank had no loans classified as troubled-debt
restructurings at December 31, 2004 or December 31, 2003.
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 114, "Accounting By Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan," as amended by SFAS No. 118, "Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan - Income Recognition and Disclosures an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 114" ("Amended SFAS 114"), provides guidelines for determining and
measuring impairment in loans. For each loan that the Bank determines to be
impaired, impairment is measured by the amount that the carrying balance of the
loan, including all accrued
interest,
exceeds the estimate of its fair value. A specific reserve is established on all
impaired loans to the extent of impairment and comprises a portion of the
allowance for loan losses. Generally, the Bank considers non-performing and
troubled-debt restructured multifamily residential and commercial real estate
loans, along with non-performing one- to four-family loans exceeding $333,700,
to be impaired. Non-performing one-to four-family loans of $333,700 or less are
considered homogeneous loan pools and are not required to be evaluated
individually for impairment. The recorded investment in loans deemed impaired
was approximately $830,000, consisting of two loans, at December 31, 2004. There
were no loans considered impaired by the Bank under Amended SFAS 114 as of
December 31, 2003. The
largest single impaired loan at December 31, 2004, which possessed an
outstanding principal balance of $446,000, was removed from impaired status in
January 2005. The average total balance of impaired loans was approximately
$608,000 during the year ended December 31, 2004, $314,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2003, $684,000 during the six months ended December 31, 2002, and
$3.2 million during the year ended June 30, 2002. The increase in the average
and ending balances of impaired loans during the year ended December 31, 2004
resulted primarily from the addition of two impaired loans totaling $830,000
during the period. The decrease in both the current and average balance of
impaired loans during the year ended December 31, 2003 and the six months ended
December 31, 2002 resulted primarily from the repayment in June 2002 of an
impaired $2.9 million troubled-debt restructured loan. At December 31, 2004,
reserves totaling $83,000 were allocated within the allowance for loan losses
for impaired loans. At both December 31, 2003 and 2002, there were no reserves
allocated within the allowance for loan losses for impaired loans. At June
30, 2002, reserves totaling $88,000 were allocated within the allowance for loan
losses for impaired loans. At December 31, 2004, non-performing loans exceeded
impaired loans by $628,000, due to $628,000 of one- to four-family and consumer
loans, which, while on non-performing status, were not deemed impaired since
they had individual outstanding balances less than $333,700.
Other
Real Estate Owned (“OREO”).
Property acquired by the Bank as a result of a foreclosure on a mortgage loan or
deed in lieu of foreclosure is classified as OREO and is recorded at the lower
of the recorded investment in the related loan or the fair value of the property
at the date of acquisition, with any resulting write down charged to the
allowance for loan losses. The Bank obtains a current appraisal on an OREO
property as soon as practicable after it takes possession of the real property.
The Bank will generally reassess the value of OREO at least annually thereafter.
There were no OREO properties as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. The balance of
OREO was $134,000 at December 31, 2002 and $114,000 at June 30, 2002, consisting
of one property in both instances. During the six months ended December 31,
2002, a reserve of $20,000 was reversed on the OREO property. The property was
sold in January 2003 and no loss was recognized on the sale.
The
following table sets forth information regarding non-performing loans,
non-performing assets, impaired loans and troubled-debt restructurings at the
dates indicated:
|
At
December 31, |
|
At
June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Non-performing
loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-
to four-family |
$475 |
$346 |
$1,232 |
|
$1,077 |
$1,572 |
$1,769 |
Multifamily
residential |
830 |
- |
690 |
|
878 |
1,131 |
2,591 |
Cooperative
apartment |
- |
- |
70 |
|
71 |
200 |
54 |
Other |
154 |
179 |
124 |
|
97 |
155 |
7 |
Total
non-performing loans |
1,459 |
525 |
2,116 |
|
2,123 |
3,058 |
4,421 |
Other
Real Estate Owned |
- |
- |
134 |
|
114 |
370 |
381 |
Total
non-performing assets |
1,459 |
525 |
2,250 |
|
2,237 |
3,428 |
4,802 |
Troubled-debt
restructurings |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
2,924 |
700 |
Total
non-performing assets and
troubled-debt restructurings |
$1,459 |
$525 |
$2,250 |
|
$2,237 |
$6,352 |
$5,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired
loans |
$830 |
$- |
$690 |
|
$878 |
$4,054 |
$2,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
non-performing loans to total loans |
0.06% |
0.02% |
0.10% |
|
0.10% |
0.16% |
0.26% |
Total
non-performing loans and troubled-debt
restructurings to total loans |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.10 |
|
0.10 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
Total
non-performing assets to total assets |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
|
0.08 |
0.13 |
0.19 |
Total
non-performing assets and troubled-
debt restructurings to total assets |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
|
0.08 |
0.23 |
0.22 |
Monitoring
of Delinquent Loans.
Management of the Bank reviews delinquent loans on a monthly basis and reports
to its Board of Directors regarding the status of all delinquent and
non-performing loans in the Bank's portfolio.
The
Bank's loan servicing policies and procedures require that an automated late
notice be sent to a delinquent borrower as soon as possible after a payment is
ten days late in the case of a multifamily residential or commercial real estate
loan, or fifteen days late in connection with a one- to four-family or consumer
loan. A second letter is sent to the borrower if payment has not been received
within 30 days of the due date. Thereafter, periodic letters are mailed and
phone calls are placed to the borrower until payment is received. When contact
is made with the borrower at any time prior to foreclosure, the Bank will
attempt to obtain the full payment due or negotiate a repayment schedule with
the borrower to avoid foreclosure.
Generally,
the Bank initiates foreclosure proceedings when a loan is 90 days past due. As
soon as practicable after initiating foreclosure proceedings, the Bank hires an
independent appraiser to prepare an estimate of the fair value of the underlying
collateral. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought
current, paid in full, or refinanced before the foreclosure action is completed,
the property securing the loan is generally sold. It is the Bank's general
policy to dispose of properties acquired through foreclosure or deeds in lieu
thereof as quickly and prudently as possible in consideration of market
conditions, the physical condition of the property and any other mitigating
conditions.
Classified
Assets. Federal
regulations and Bank policy require that loans and other assets possessing
certain characteristics be classified as ''Substandard,'' ''Doubtful'' or
''Loss'' assets. An asset is considered ''Substandard'' if it is inadequately
protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or the
collateral pledged, if any. ''Substandard'' assets have a well-defined weakness
or weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank
will sustain ''some loss'' if deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified
as ''Doubtful'' have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified
''Substandard'' with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make
''collection or liquidation in full,'' on the basis of current existing facts,
conditions, and values, ''highly questionable and improbable.'' Assets
classified as ''Loss'' are those considered ''uncollectible'' and of such little
value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific
loss reserve is not warranted. Assets which do not expose the Bank to sufficient
risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but
possess potential weaknesses that deserve management's attention, are designated
''Special Mention.''
The Loan
Loss Reserve Committee, subject to approval of the Bank's Board of Directors,
establishes policies relating to the internal classification of loans. The Bank
believes that its classification policies are consistent with regulatory
policies. All non-performing loans, troubled-debt restructurings and OREO are
considered to be classified assets. In addition, the Bank maintains a "watch
list," composed of loans that, while performing, are characterized by weaknesses
requiring special attention from management and are considered to be potential
problem loans. All loans on the watch list are considered to be classified
assets or are otherwise categorized as "Special Mention."
The
Bank's Loan Loss Reserve Committee reviews all loans in the Bank's portfolio
quarterly, with particular emphasis on problem loans, in order to determine
whether any loans require reclassification in accordance with applicable
regulatory guidelines. The Loan Loss Reserve Committee reports its
recommendations to the Bank's Board of Directors on a quarterly
basis.
The year
ended December 31, 2004 saw the continuation of a strong real estate market
throughout the New York metropolitan area. As a result, the Bank's level of
classified assets continued their historic low levels. At December 31, 2004, the
Bank had 15 loans totaling $2.8 million designated Special Mention, compared to
13 loans totaling $935,000 at December 31, 2003. The increase resulted from the
addition of one loan with an outstanding principal balance of $1.4 million to
Special Mention status during the year ended December 31, 2004.
At
December 31, 2004, the Bank had $1.1 million of assets classified as
Substandard, comprised of 8 loans. At December 31, 2003, the
Bank had $494,000 of assets classified Substandard, consisting of five loans.
The increase in dollar amount resulted primarily from the addition of two loans
totaling $830,000 to Substandard classification status during the year ended
December 31, 2004. The larger of these two loans, with an outstanding principal
balance of $446,000, was removed from substandard classification status in
January 2005.
At both
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Bank had no assets classified as either Doubtful
or Loss. The watch list contained 16 loans totaling $2.8 million at December 31,
2004, compared to 15 loans totaling $1.1 million at December 31,
2003.
The
following table sets forth at December 31, 2004 the Bank's aggregate carrying
value of the assets classified as either Substandard or Special
Mention:
|
Special
Mention |
|
Substandard |
|
Number |
Amount |
|
Number |
Amount |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Mortgage
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
residential |
4 |
$2,142 |
|
4 |
$830 |
One-
to four-family |
5 |
534 |
|
2 |
229 |
Cooperative
apartment |
6 |
172 |
|
2 |
62 |
Commercial
real estate |
-
|
- |
|
- |
- |
Total
Mortgage Loans |
15 |
2,848 |
|
8 |
1,121 |
Other
Real Estate Owned |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
Total |
15 |
$2,848 |
|
8 |
$1,121 |
The
allowance for loan losses was determined in accordance with GAAP, under which
the Bank is required to maintain an appropriate allowance for loan losses. The
Loan Loss Reserve Committee is charged with, among other functions,
responsibility for monitoring the appropriateness of the loan loss reserve. The
Loan Loss Reserve Committee's findings, along with recommendations for changes
to loan loss reserve provisions, if any, are reported directly to the Bank's
senior management and Board of Directors. The following table sets forth
activity in the Bank's allowance for loan losses at or for the dates
indicated:
|
At
or for the Year Ended December 31, |
|
At
or for the Six Months Ended December 31, |
|
At
or for the Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Total
loans outstanding at
end
of period (1) |
$2,501,805 |
$2,192,640 |
$2,170,077 |
|
$2,170,077 |
$2,055,562 |
|
$2,120,254
|
$1,960,361
|
$1,721,200
|
Average
total loans outstanding (1) |
$2,397,187 |
$2,206,003 |
$2,128,297 |
|
$2,169,442 |
$1,998,694 |
|
$2,042,923
|
$1,819,336
|
$1,563,656
|
Allowance
for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
$15,018 |
$15,458 |
$15,492 |
|
$15,370 |
$15,459 |
|
$15,459 |
$14,785 |
$15,081 |
Provision
for loan losses |
280 |
288 |
240 |
|
120 |
120 |
|
240 |
740 |
240 |
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multifamily
residential |
- |
- |
(42) |
|
- |
(71) |
|
(113) |
- |
- |
Commercial
real estate |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
(6) |
- |
One-
to four-family |
(3) |
(2) |
(169) |
|
(33) |
(20) |
|
(156) |
(13) |
(500) |
FHA/VA
insured |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
Cooperative
apartment |
- |
(1) |
(79) |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
(14) |
(24) |
Other |
(155) |
(60) |
- |
|
(11) |
(12) |
|
(80) |
(48) |
(21) |
Total
charge-offs |
(158) |
(63) |
(290) |
|
(44) |
(103) |
|
(349) |
(81) |
(545) |
Recoveries |
25 |
34 |
16 |
|
12 |
16 |
|
20 |
15 |
9 |
Reserve
for loan commitments
transferred
from (to) other liabilities |
378 |
(699) |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
Balance
at end of period |
$15,543 |
$15,018 |
$15,458 |
|
$15,458 |
$15,492 |
|
$15,370 |
$15,459 |
$14,785 |
Allowance
for loan losses to
total loans at end of period |
0.62% |
0.68% |
0.71% |
|
0.71% |
0.75% |
|
0.72% |
0.79% |
0.86% |
Allowance
for loan losses to
total non-performing loans
at end of period |
1,065.32 |
2,860.57 |
730.53 |
|
730.53 |
815.80 |
|
723.98 |
505.53 |
334.43 |
Allowance
for loan losses to
total non-performing loans
and troubled-debt restructurings
at end of period |
1,065.32 |
2,860.57 |
730.53 |
|
730.53 |
321.21 |
|
723.98 |
258.43 |
288.71 |
Ratio
of net charge-offs to
average loans outstanding
during the period |
- |
- |
- |
|
- |
- |
|
0.02% |
- |
0.03% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Total
loans represent gross loans, net of deferred loan fees and discounts.
|
Based
upon its evaluation of the loan portfolio, management believes that the Bank has
maintained its allowance for loan losses at a level which is appropriate to
absorb losses
inherent
within the Bank's loan portfolio as of the balance sheet dates. The allowance
for loan losses was $15.5 million at December 31, 2004 compared to $15.0 million
at December 31, 2003. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Bank
re-designated $378,000 of reserves related to loan origination commitments into
its allowance for loan losses. Previously, these reserves were recorded in other
liabilities. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2004, the Bank
recorded a provision of $280,000 to the allowance for loan losses to provide for
growth in its loan portfolio balances. The Bank also recorded net charge-offs of
$133,000 during the year ended December 31, 2004, virtually all of which related
to consumer loans.
Factors
considered in determining the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses
include the Bank's past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the
portfolio, existing adverse situations which may affect the borrower's ability
to repay, estimated value of underlying collateral and current economic
conditions in the Bank's lending area. While management uses available
information to estimate losses on loans, future additions to, or reductions in,
the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions beyond
management's control. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral
part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank's allowance for
loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to, or
reductions in, the allowance based upon judgments different from those of
management. Management believes, based upon all relevant and available
information, that the allowance for loan losses is appropriate to absorb losses
inherent in the portfolio.
The
following table sets forth the Bank's allowance for loan losses allocated by
loan category and the percent of loans in each category to total loans at the
dates indicated:
|
At
December 31, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
Allocated
Amount |
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each Category to Total Loans(1) |
Allocated
Amount |
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each Category to Total Loans(1) |
Allocated
Amount |
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each Category to Total Loans(1) |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Impaired
loans |
83 |
0.04% |
- |
- |
- |
0.03% |
Multifamily
residential |
11,753 |
76.72 |
11,391 |
79.24% |
11,831 |
79.90 |
Commercial
real estate |
3,161 |
16.98 |
2,742 |
14.15 |
2,416 |
12.26 |
One-to
four- family |
436 |
5.05 |
686 |
5.67 |
1,051 |
6.74 |
Cooperative
apartment |
65 |
0.47 |
124 |
0.63 |
151 |
0.76 |
Construction |
- |
0.62 |
- |
0.13 |
- |
0.09 |
Other |
45 |
0.12 |
75 |
0.18 |
9 |
0.22 |
Total |
$15,543 |
100.00% |
$15,018 |
100.00% |
$15,458 |
100.00% |
|
At
June 30, |
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Allocated
Amount |
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each Category to Total Loans(1) |
Allocated
Amount |
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each Category to Total Loans(1) |
Allocated
Amount |
Percent
of
Loans
in
Each Category to Total Loans(1) |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Impaired
loans |
$88 |
0.01% |
$775 |
0.21% |
$130 |
0.15% |
Multifamily
residential |
11,843 |
80.12 |
10,190 |
80.98 |
10,000 |
78.65 |
Commercial
real estate |
2,167 |
11.52 |
1,214 |
7.78 |
1,095 |
6.92 |
One-to
four- family |
1,094 |
7.33 |
3,005 |
9.48 |
3,176 |
12.23 |
Cooperative
apartment |
162 |
0.84 |
184 |
1.17 |
254 |
1.60 |
Construction |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Other |
16 |
0.18 |
91 |
0.38 |
130 |
0.45 |
Total |
$15,370 |
100.00% |
$15,459 |
100.00% |
$14,785 |
100.00% |
(1)
|
Total
loans represent gross loans less FHA and VA guaranteed
loans. |
Investment
Strategies of the Holding Company. The
Holding Company's principal asset is its investment in the Bank's common stock,
which amounted to $312.8 million at December 31, 2004. All of the Holding
Company's other investments were intended primarily to provide future liquidity
which may be utilized for general business activities, which may include, but
are not limited to: (1) purchases of the Holding Company's common stock into
treasury; (2) repayment of principal and interest on the Holding Company's $25.0
million subordinated note obligation and $72.2 million trust preferred
securities borrowing; (3) subject to applicable dividend restriction
limitations, the payment of dividends on the Holding Company's common stock;
and/or (4) investments in the equity securities of other financial institutions
and other investments not permitted to the Bank. The Holding Company's
investment policy calls for investments in relatively short-term, liquid
securities similar to the securities defined in the securities investment policy
of the Bank. The Holding Company cannot assure that it will engage in any of
these activities in the future.
Investment
Policy of the Bank. The
investment policy of the Bank, which is adopted by its Board of Directors, is
designed to help achieve the Bank's overall asset/liability management
objectives and to comply with the applicable regulations of the OTS. Generally,
when selecting new investments for the Bank's portfolio, the policy calls for
management to emphasize principal preservation, liquidity, diversification,
short maturities and/or repricing terms, and a favorable return on investment.
The policy permits investments in various types of liquid assets, including
obligations of the U.S. Treasury and federal agencies, investment grade
corporate debt, various types of MBS, commercial paper, certificates of deposit
("CDs") and overnight federal funds sold to financial institutions. The Bank's
Board of Directors periodically approves all financial institutions that buy
federal funds from the Bank.
Investment
strategies are implemented by the Asset and Liability Management Committee
("ALCO"), composed of the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating
Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other senior officers. The strategies take
into account the overall composition of the Bank's balance sheet, including
loans and deposits, and are intended to protect and enhance the Bank's earnings
and market value. The strategies are reviewed monthly by the ALCO and reported
regularly to the Board of Directors.
During
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, neither the Holding Company nor the
Bank held any derivative instruments or any embedded derivative instruments that
required bifurcation. The Holding Company or the Bank may, with respective Board
approval, engage in hedging transactions utilizing derivative
instruments.
Mortgage-Backed
Securities ("MBS"). MBS
provide the portfolio with investments offering desirable repricing, cash flow
and credit quality characteristics. MBS yield less than the loans that underlie
the securities as a result of the cost of payment guarantees and credit
enhancements which reduce credit risk to the investor. Although MBS guaranteed
by federally sponsored agencies carry a reduced credit risk compared to whole
loans, such securities remain subject to the risk that fluctuating interest
rates, along with other factors such as the geographic distribution of the
underlying mortgage loans, may alter the prepayment rate of such loans and thus
affect both the prepayment speed and value of such securities. MBS, however, are
more liquid than individual mortgage loans and may readily be used to
collateralize borrowings. The MBS portfolio also provides the Holding Company
and the Bank with important interest rate risk management features, as the
entire portfolio provides monthly cash flow for re-investment at current market
interest rates. None of the Company's MBS as of December 31, 2004 possessed call
features.
The
Company's consolidated investment in MBS totaled $519.9 million, or 15.4% of
total assets, at December 31, 2004, the majority of which was owned by
the Bank. At December 31, 2004, the largest component of the portfolio was
$474.5 million in Collateralized Mortgage Obligations ("CMOs") and Real Estate
Mortgage Investment Conduits ("REMICs") owned by the Bank. All of the CMOs and
REMICs were either U.S agency guaranteed obligations or issued by private
financial institutions. All of the non-agency guaranteed obligations were rated
in the highest ratings category by at least one nationally recognized rating
agency at the time of purchase. None of the CMOs and REMICs had stripped
principal and interest components and all occupied priority tranches within
their respective issues. As of December 31, 2004, the fair value of CMOs and
REMICs was approximately $6.4 million below their cost basis.
The
remaining MBS portfolio was composed of pass-through securities guaranteed by
the Government National Mortgage Agency ("GNMA"), The Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation ("FHLMC") or FNMA. These securities approximated 8.7% of the total
MBS portfolio at December 31, 2004. This portion of the portfolio was composed
of a $15.6 million investment in ARM MBS pass-through securities with a weighted
average term to next rate adjustment of less than one year, and a $29.8 million
investment in seasoned fixed-rate GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pass-through securities
with an estimated average remaining life of less than 3.5 years.
GAAP
requires that investments in equity securities have readily determinable fair
values and all investments in debt securities be classified in one of the
following three categories and accounted for accordingly: trading securities,
securities available for sale or securities held to maturity. Neither the
Company nor the Bank had any securities classified as trading securities during
the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, nor do they presently
anticipate establishing a trading portfolio. Unrealized gains and losses on
available for sale securities are reported as a separate component of
stockholders' equity referred to as accumulated other comprehensive income, net
of deferred taxes. At December 31, 2004, the Holding Company and the Bank had,
on a combined basis, $574.3 million of securities classified as available for
sale, which represented 17.0% of total assets at December 31, 2004. Based upon
the size of the available for sale portfolio, future variations in the market
value of the available for sale portfolio could result in fluctuations in the
Company's consolidated stockholders' equity.
The
Company typically classifies purchased MBS as available for sale, in recognition
of the greater prepayment uncertainty associated with these securities, and
carries them at fair market value. The amortized cost of MBS available for sale
(excluding CMOs and REMICs) exceeded their fair value by $217,000 at December
31, 2004.
The
following table sets forth activity in the MBS portfolio for the periods
indicated:
|
For
the Year Ended December 31, |
|
For
the Six Months Ended December 31, |
|
For
the Year
Ended
June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Amortized
cost at beginning of period |
$464,671 |
$359,304 |
|
$285,201 |
|
$433,097 |
Purchases,
net |
271,221 |
473,389 |
|
224,579 |
|
37,218 |
Principal
repayments |
(206,455) |
(364,208) |
|
(149,556) |
|
(184,835) |
Premium
amortization, net |
(3,363) |
(3,814) |
|
(920) |
|
(279) |
Amortized
cost at end of period |
$526,074 |
$464,671 |
|
$359,304 |
|
$285,201 |
U. S.
Treasury and Agency Obligations. At
December 31, 2004, the Company's consolidated investment in U. S. Treasury and
agency securities totaled $13.0 million. Virtually all of these investments were
agency obligations issued either by the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB"), FHLMC,
or FNMA.
Corporate
Debt Obligations. Both the
Holding Company and the Bank invest in the short-term investment-grade debt
obligations of various corporations. Corporate debt obligations generally carry
both a higher rate of return and a higher degree of credit risk than U.S.
Treasury and agency securities with comparable maturities. In addition,
corporate securities are generally less liquid than comparable U.S. Treasury and
agency securities. In recognition of the additional risks associated with these
securities, the Bank's investment policy limits new investments in corporate
debt obligations to companies rated single ''A'' or better by one of the
nationally recognized rating agencies, and limits investments in any one
corporate entity to the lesser of 1% of total assets or 15% of the Bank's
equity. At December 31, 2004, the Company's consolidated portfolio of corporate
debt obligations totaled $36.0 million. The majority of these investments were
held by the Bank.
Equity
Investments. The
Company's consolidated investment in equity securities totaled $5.9 million at
December 31, 2004, and was comprised primarily of various equity mutual fund
investments.
The
following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of the total
portfolio of investment securities and MBS at the dates indicated:
|
At
December 31, |
|
At
June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
|
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Mortgage-backed
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMOs
and REMICs |
$480,865 |
$474,459 |
$428,847 |
$426,017 |
$292,541 |
$293,928 |
|
$209,476 |
$213,579 |
FHLMC |
1,454 |
1,493 |
7,509 |
7,680 |
15,896 |
16,289 |
|
10,069 |
10,351 |
FNMA |
29,250 |
29,125 |
3,381 |
3,510 |
8,122 |
8,435 |
|
11,681 |
12,005 |
GNMA |
14,505 |
14,828 |
24,934 |
25,582 |
42,745 |
44,388 |
|
53,975 |
55,686 |
Total
mortgage-backed
securities |
526,074 |
519,905 |
464,671 |
462,789 |
359,304 |
363,040 |
|
285,201 |
291,621 |
Investment
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasury and agency |
12,999 |
12,956 |
5,011 |
5,026 |
52,741 |
53,289 |
|
85,050 |
85,823 |
Other |
42,143 |
42,473 |
32,442 |
32,799 |
52,463 |
52,110 |
|
53,136 |
53,639 |
Total
investment securities |
55,142 |
55,429 |
37,453 |
37,825 |
105,204 |
105,399 |
|
138,186 |
139,462 |
Net
unrealized (loss) gain (1) |
(5,906) |
- |
(1,570) |
- |
3,833 |
- |
|
7,553 |
- |
Total
securities, net |
$575,310 |
$575,334 |
$500,554 |
$500,614 |
$468,341 |
$468,439 |
|
$430,940 |
$431,083 |
(1)
|
The
net unrealized (loss) gain relates to available for sale securities in
accordance with SFAS 115, "Accounting for Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities." The net unrealized (loss) gain is presented in order to
reconcile the ''Amortized Cost'' of the available for sale securities
portfolio to the recorded value reflected in the Company's Consolidated
Statements of Condition. |
The
following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair value of the total
portfolio of investment securities and MBS, by accounting classification and
type of security, at the dates indicated:
|
At
December 31, |
|
At
June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
|
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Held-to-Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities (1) |
$465 |
$485 |
$770 |
$822 |
$2,249 |
$2,337 |
|
$3,275 |
$3,409 |
Investment
securities (2) |
585 |
589 |
710 |
718 |
825 |
835 |
|
875 |
884 |
Total
Held-to-Maturity |
$1,050 |
$1,074 |
$1,480 |
$1,540 |
$3,074 |
$3,172 |
|
$4,150 |
$4,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass-through
securities |
$44,744 |
$44,961 |
$35,054 |
$35,950 |
$64,514 |
$66,775 |
|
$72,450 |
$74,633 |
CMOs
and REMICs |
480,865 |
474,459 |
428,847 |
426,017 |
292,541 |
293,928 |
|
209,476 |
213,579 |
Total
mortgage-backed
securities
available for sale |
525,609 |
519,420 |
463,901 |
461,967 |
357,055 |
360,703 |
|
281,926 |
288,212 |
Investment
securities (2) |
54,557 |
54,840 |
36,743 |
37,107 |
104,379 |
104,564 |
|
137,311 |
138,578 |
Net
unrealized (loss) gain (3) |
(5,906) |
- |
(1,570) |
- |
3,833 |
- |
|
7,553 |
- |
Total
Available-for-Sale |
$574,260 |
$574,260 |
$499,074 |
$499,074 |
$465,267 |
$465,267 |
|
$426,790 |
$426,790 |
Total
securities, net |
$575,310 |
$575,334 |
$500,554 |
$500,614 |
$468,341 |
$468,439 |
|
$430,940 |
$431,083 |
(1) Includes
both pass-through securities and investments in CMOs and REMICs.
(2) Includes
corporate debt obligations.
(3) |
The
net unrealized (loss) gain relates to available for sale securities in
accordance with SFAS No. 115. The net unrealized (loss) gain is presented
in order to reconcile the ''Amortized Cost'' of the securities portfolio
to the recorded value reflected in the Company's Consolidated Statements
of Condition. |
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost,
fair value and weighted average yield of investment securities and MBS at
December 31, 2004, by remaining period to contractual maturity. With respect to
MBS, the entire carrying amount of the security at December 31, 2004 is
reflected in the maturity period that includes the final security payment date
and, accordingly, no effect has been given to periodic repayments or possible
prepayments. The investment policies of both the Holding Company and the Bank
call for the purchase of only priority tranches when investing in MBS. As a
result, the weighted average duration of the Company's MBS approximated 2.5
years as of December 31, 2004 when giving consideration to anticipated
repayments or possible prepayments, which is far less than their calculated
average maturity in the table below. Other than obligations of federal agencies
and GSEs, neither the Holding Company nor the Bank had a combined investment in
securities issued by any one entity in excess of 15% of stockholders' equity at
December 31, 2004.
|
At
December 31, 2004 |
|
Held
to Maturity |
Available
for Sale |
|
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
Weighted
Average
Yield |
Amortized
Cost |
Fair
Value |
Weighted
Average
Yield |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Mortgage-backed
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
within 1 year |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Due
after 1 year but within 5 years |
$465 |
$485 |
7.97% |
$899 |
$933 |
5.66% |
Due
after 5 years but within 10 years |
- |
- |
- |
29,217 |
28,975 |
3.98 |
Due
after ten years |
- |
- |
- |
495,494 |
489,512 |
4.01 |
Total |
465 |
485 |
7.97 |
525,610 |
519,420 |
4.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasury and agency: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
within 1 year |
- |
- |
- |
10,000 |
9,961 |
2.29 |
Due
after 1 year but within 5 years |
- |
- |
- |
2,999 |
2,995 |
2.88 |
Due
after 5 years but within 10 years |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Due
after ten years |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Total |
- |
- |
- |
12,999 |
12,956 |
2.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
within 1 year |
- |
- |
- |
1,036 |
1,032 |
6.75 |
Due
after 1 year but within 5 years |
585 |
589 |
7.26 |
997 |
986 |
2.80 |
Due
after 5 years but within 10 years |
- |
- |
- |
1000 |
1,025 |
5.00 |
Due
after ten years |
- |
- |
- |
38,525 |
38,841 |
4.04 |
Total |
585 |
589 |
7.26 |
41,558 |
41,884 |
4.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
within 1 year |
- |
- |
- |
11,036 |
10,993 |
2.71 |
Due
after 1 year but within 5 years |
1,050 |
1,074 |
7.58 |
4,895 |
4,914 |
3.37 |
Due
after 5 years but within 10 years |
- |
- |
- |
30,217 |
30,000 |
4.01 |
Due
after ten years |
- |
- |
- |
534,019 |
528,353 |
4.01 |
Total |
$1,050 |
$1,074 |
7.58% |
$580,167 |
$574,260 |
3.98% |
General.
The
Bank's primary sources of funding for its lending and investment activities
include deposits, repayments of loans and MBS, investment security maturities
and redemptions, Advances from the FHLBNY, and borrowing in the form of REPOS
entered into with various financial institutions, including the FHLBNY. The Bank
also sells selected multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans to
FNMA, and long-term, one- to four-family residential real estate loans to either
FNMA or SONYMA.
Deposits.
The Bank
offers a variety of deposit accounts possessing a range of interest rates and
terms. The Bank, at December 31, 2004 and presently, offers savings, money
market, checking, NOW and Super NOW accounts, and CDs. The flow of deposits is
influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in prevailing
interest rates, and competition from other financial institutions and investment
products. Traditionally, the Bank has relied upon direct marketing, customer
service, convenience and long-standing relationships with customers to generate
deposits. The communities in which the Bank maintains branch offices have
historically provided the Bank with nearly all of its deposits. At December 31,
2004, the Bank had deposit liabilities of $2.21 billion, up $168.4 million from
December 31, 2003 (See "Item 7 - Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and
Capital Resources"). Within total deposits at December 31, 2004, $263.2
million, or 11.9%, consisted of CDs with balances over
$100,000.
Individual Retirement Accounts totaled $116.8 million, or 5.3% of total
deposits.
The Bank
is authorized to accept brokered CDs up to an aggregate limit of $120.0 million.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Bank had no brokered CDs.
The
following table presents the deposit activity of the Bank for the periods
indicated:
|
Year
Ended December 31, |
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, |
|
Year
Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
2002 |
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Deposits |
$3,445,897 |
$3,055,095 |
$3,012,112 |
|
$1,556,645 |
$1,332,182 |
|
$2,787,649 |
Withdrawals |
3,315,462 |
2,978,932 |
2,728,969 |
|
1,435,740 |
1,191,845 |
|
2,485,046 |
Deposits
greater than Withdrawals |
130,435 |
76,163 |
283,143 |
|
120,905 |
140,337 |
|
302,603 |
Interest
credited |
37,936 |
38,340 |
48,670 |
|
26,236 |
26,565 |
|
48,999 |
Total
increase in deposits |
$168,371 |
$114,503 |
$331,813 |
|
$147,141 |
$166,902 |
|
$351,602 |
At
December 31, 2004, the Bank had $263.2 million in CDs over $100,000 maturing as
follows:
Maturity
Period |
Amount |
Weighted
Average Rate |
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Within
three months |
$102,780 |
2.36% |
After
three but within six months |
85,622 |
2.58 |
After
six but within twelve months |
23,259 |
2.32 |
After
12 months |
51,544 |
3.27 |
Total |
$263,205 |
2.61% |
The
following table sets forth the distribution of the Bank's deposit accounts and
the related weighted average interest rates at the dates indicated:
|
At
December 31, 2004 |
|
At
December 31, 2003 |
|
At
December 31, 2002 |
|
Amount |
Percent
of
Total Deposits |
Weighted
Average Rate |
|
Amount |
Percent
of Total Deposits |
Weighted
Average Rate |
|
Amount |
Percent
of Total Deposits |
Weighted
Average Rate |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Savings
accounts |
$362,656 |
16.41% |
0.56% |
|
$366,592 |
17.96% |
0.55% |
|
$362,400 |
18.80% |
0.78% |
CDs |
959,951 |
43.44 |
2.52 |
|
800,350 |
39.20 |
2.64 |
|
830,140 |
43.08 |
3.21 |
Money
market accounts |
749,040 |
33.89 |
1.40 |
|
745,387 |
36.51 |
1.35 |
|
616,762 |
32.00 |
1.90 |
NOW
and
Super NOW accounts |
45,178 |
2.04 |
1.08 |
|
37,043 |
1.81 |
1.02 |
|
31,822 |
1.65 |
1.24 |
Checking
accounts |
93,224 |
4.22 |
- |
|
92,306 |
4.52 |
- |
|
86,051 |
4.47 |
- |
Totals |
$2,210,049 |
100.00% |
1.68% |
|
$2,041,678 |
100.00% |
1.65% |
|
$1,927,175 |
100.00% |
2.16% |
The
following table presents, by interest rate ranges, the dollar amount of CDs
outstanding at the dates indicated and the period to maturity of the CDs
outstanding at December 31, 2004:
|
Period
to Maturity at December 31, 2004 |
Interest
Rate Range |
One
Year or Less |
Over
One Year to Three Years |
Over
Three Years to Five Years |
Over
Five Years |
|
Total
at
December
31,
2004 |
Total
at
December
31,
2003 |
Total
at
December
31,
2002 |
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
2.00%
and below |
$337,826 |
$27,034 |
$11 |
- |
|
$364,871 |
$353,485 |
$173,179 |
2.01%
to 3.00% |
351,053 |
104,744 |
216 |
$6 |
|
456,019 |
182,233 |
297,770 |
3.01%
to 4.00% |
21,372 |
14,146 |
34,312 |
6 |
|
69,836 |
162,063 |
176,384 |
4.01%
to 5.00% |
12,035 |
31,994 |
202 |
- |
|
44,231 |
50,109 |
95,512 |
5.01%
and above |
12,558 |
12,436 |
- |
- |
|
24,994 |
52,460 |
87,295 |
Total |
$734,844 |
$190,354 |
$34,741 |
$12 |
|
$959,951 |
$800,350 |
$830,140 |
Borrowings.
The Bank
has been a member and shareholder of the FHLBNY since 1980. One of the
privileges offered to FHLBNY shareholders is the ability to secure Advances
under various lending programs at competitive interest rates. The Bank's
borrowing line equaled $993.5 million at December 31, 2004.
The Bank
had Advances from the FHLBNY totaling $506.5 million and $534.0 million at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. At
December 31, 2004, the Bank maintained sufficient collateral, as defined by the
FHLBNY (principally in the form of real estate loans), to secure such Advances.
REPOS
totaled $205.6 million and $12.7 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004 and
2003. REPOS involve the delivery of securities to broker-dealers as collateral
for borrowing transactions. The securities remain registered in the name of the
Bank, and are returned upon the maturities of the agreements. Funds to repay the
Bank's REPOS at maturity are provided primarily by cash received from the
maturing securities.
Presented
below is information concerning REPOS and FHLBNY Advances for the periods
presented:
REPOS:
|
At
or for the
Fiscal
Year
Ended
December 31, |
|
At
or for the Six Months Ended December 31, |
|
At
or for the
Fiscal
Year Ended
June
30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Balance
outstanding at end of period |
$205,584 |
$12,675 |
|
$95,541 |
|
$97,717 |
Average
interest cost at end of period |
2.48% |
4.96% |
|
5.68% |
|
5.61% |
Average
balance outstanding during the period |
$129,426 |
$71,302 |
|
$97,941 |
|
$260,988 |
Average
interest cost during the period (1) |
2.34% |
8.86% |
|
5.35% |
|
4.47% |
Carrying
value of underlying collateral at end of period |
$219,311 |
$12,967 |
|
$85,226 |
|
$95,994 |
Estimated
fair value of underlying collateral |
$216,754 |
$13,045 |
|
$87,479 |
|
$96,093 |
Maximum
balance outstanding at month end during the year |
$220,649 |
$86,020 |
|
$98,728 |
|
$395,444 |
(1)
Excluding prepayment expenses of $2,555 recorded during the year ended December
31, 2003, the average interest cost was 5.29% during the year ended December 31,
2003. Excluding prepayment expenses of $339 recorded during the year ended June
30, 2002, the average interest cost was 4.31% during the year ended June 30,
2002. There were no prepayments during the year ended December 31, 2004, or the
six months ended December 31, 2002.
FHLBNY
Advances:
|
At
or for the Fiscal Year
Ended
December 31, |
|
At
or for the Six Months Ended December 31, |
|
At
or for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Balance
outstanding at end of period |
$506,500 |
$534,000 |
|
$555,000 |
|
$575,000 |
Average
interest cost at end of period |
4.21% |
3.85% |
|
4.11% |
|
5.07% |
Weighted
average balance outstanding during the period |
$515,626 |
$559,726 |
|
$572,024 |
|
$565,520 |
Average
interest cost during the period (1) |
4.00% |
3.98% |
|
4.90% |
|
5.90% |
Maximum
balance outstanding at month end during period |
$534,000 |
$574,000 |
|
$590,000 |
|
$582,500 |
(1)
Amounts in the above table exclude the effects of prepayment expenses paid on
FHLBNY Advances. Including prepayment expenses paid on FHLBNY Advances of $1.6
million during the year ended December 31, 2003, $3.6 million during the six
months ended December 31, 2002 and $5.9 million during the year ended June 30,
2002, the average interest cost on FHLBNY Advances was 4.30% during the year
ended December 31, 2003, 6.18% during the six months ended December 31, 2002 and
6.94% during the year ended June 30, 2002. The Bank did not prepay any FHLBNY
Advances during the year ended December 31, 2004.
During
the year ended December 31, 2003, the Bank prepaid a total of $30.0 million in
FHLBNY Advances and $52.0 million in REPOS. The prepaid FHLBNY Advances
possessed a combined average interest rate of 5.89% and an average remaining
term to maturity of 1.1 years on their respective prepayment dates. The Bank did
not replace these prepaid FHLBNY Advances and REPOS.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2002, the Bank prepaid a total of $152.5
million in FHLBNY Advances. The prepaid FHLBNY Advances possessed a combined
average interest rate of 6.62% and an average remaining term to maturity of less
than one year on their respective prepayment dates. The majority of these
prepaid FHLBNY Advances were replaced with new FHLBNY Advances. During the six
months ended December 31, 2002, the average rate on the replacement FHLBNY
Advances was 3.26%. These FHLBNY Advances possessed an average remaining term to
their next maturity, call or repricing of approximately 5.0 years at December
31, 2002. The remainder of the prepaid FHLBNY Advances were not replaced with
borrowed funds as liquidity generated from deposit inflows and loan and MBS
amortization replaced their need as a source of funding.
During
the twelve months ended June 30, 2002, the Bank prepaid a total of $254.0
million in FHLBNY Advances and REPOS. The prepaid FHLBNY Advances and REPOS
possessed a combined average interest rate of 5.43% and an average remaining
term to maturity of less than one year on their respective prepayment dates. The
majority of these prepaid FHLBNY Advances and REPOS were replaced with new
FHLBNY Advances. During the twelve months ended June 30, 2002, the average rate
on new FHLBNY Advances was 3.91%. These FHLBNY Advances possessed an average
remaining term to maturity of approximately 5 years at June 30, 2002. The
remainder of the prepaid FHLBNY Advances and REPOS were not replaced with
borrowed funds as liquidity generated from deposit inflows and loan and MBS
amortization replaced their need as a source of funding.
In
addition to the Bank, the Holding Company's direct and indirect subsidiaries
consist of seven wholly-owned corporations, one of which are directly
owned by the Holding Company and six of which are directly or indirectly owned
by the Bank. DSBW Preferred Funding Corp. is a direct subsidiary of Havemeyer
Equities, Inc., which is a direct subsidiary of the Bank. The following table
presents an overview of the Holding Company's subsidiaries as of December 31,
2004:
Subsidiary |
Year/
State of Incorporation |
Primary
Business Activities |
|
|
|
Havemeyer
Equities, Inc. |
1977
/ New York |
Ownership
of DSBW Preferred Funding Corp. |
Boulevard
Funding Corp. |
1981
/ New York |
Currently
inactive |
Havemeyer
Investments, Inc. |
1997
/ New York |
Sale
of non-FDIC insured investment products |
DSBW
Preferred Funding Corp. |
1998
/ Delaware |
Real
Estate Investment Trust investing in multifamily
residential
and commercial real estate loans |
DSBW
Residential Preferred Funding Corp. |
1998
/ Delaware |
Real
Estate Investment Trust investing in one- to
four-family real estate loans |
842
Manhattan Avenue Corp. |
1995/
New York |
Management
and ownership of real estate |
Dime
Reinvestment Corporation |
2004
/ Delaware |
Community
Development Entity. Currently inactive. |
As of
December 31, 2004, the Company had 315 full-time employees and 80 part-time
employees. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit,
and the Holding Company and all of its subsidiaries consider their relationships
with their employees to be good.
The
following is a discussion of material tax matters and does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to the
Company.
General. The
Bank was last audited by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") for its taxable
year ended December 31, 1988. For federal income tax purposes, the Company files
consolidated income tax returns on a June 30 fiscal year basis using the accrual
method of accounting and will be subject to federal income taxation in the same
manner as other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly the
Bank's tax reserve for bad debts, discussed below.
Tax
Bad Debt Reserves. The
Bank, as a "large bank" under IRS classifications (i.e., one
with assets having an adjusted basis of more than $500 million), is: (i) unable
to make additions to its tax bad debt reserve, (ii) permitted to deduct bad
debts only as they occur, and (iii) required to recapture (i.e., take
into income) over a multi-year period, a portion of the balance of its tax bad
debt reserves as of June 30, 1997. Since the Bank has already provided a
deferred income tax liability for this tax for financial reporting purposes,
there was no adverse impact to the Bank's financial condition or results of
operations from the enactment of the federal legislation that imposed such
recapture.
Distributions.
"Non-dividend distributions" to shareholders of the Bank are considered
distributions from the Bank's "base year reserve" (i.e., its
reserve as of December 31, 1987, to the extent thereof), and then from its
supplemental reserve for losses on loans. Non-dividend distributions include
distributions: (i) in excess of the Bank's current and accumulated earnings and
profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes; (ii) for redemption of
stock; and (iii) for partial or complete liquidation.
An amount
based on the total distributed will be included in the Bank's taxable income in
the year of distribution. Dividends paid out of the Bank's current or
accumulated earnings and profits will not be so included in the Bank's income.
The amount of additional taxable income created from a non-dividend distribution
is the amount that, when reduced by the amount of the tax attributable to this
income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. Thus, approximately one and
one-half times the amount of such distribution (but not in excess of the amount
of such reserves) would be includable in income for federal income tax purposes,
assuming a 35% federal corporate income tax rate. (See "Regulation - Regulation of Federal Savings
Associations - Limitation on Capital Distributions" for limits on the
payment of dividends by the Bank). The Bank does not intend to pay dividends
that would result in a recapture of any portion of its tax bad debt
reserves.
Corporate
Alternative Minimum Tax. The
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") imposes a tax ("AMT") on
alternative minimum taxable income ("AMTI") at a rate of 20%. AMTI is adjusted
by determining the tax treatment of certain items in a manner that negates the
deferral of income resulting from the customary tax treatment of those items.
Thus, the Bank's AMTI is increased by 75% of the amount by which the Bank's
adjusted current earnings exceed its AMTI (determined without regard to this
adjustment and prior to reduction for net operating losses).
State
of New York. The
Company is subject to New York State ("NYS") franchise tax on one of several
alternative bases, whichever results in the greatest tax, and files combined
returns for this purpose. The basic tax is measured by "entire net income,"
which is federal taxable income with adjustments.
For NYS
tax purposes, as long as the Bank continues to satisfy certain definitional
tests relating to its assets and the nature of its business, it will be
permitted deductions, within specified formula limits, for additions to its bad
debt reserves for purposes of computing its entire net income.
The
Bank's deduction with respect to "qualifying loans," which are generally loans
secured by certain interests in real property, may be computed using an amount
based on the Bank's actual loss experience (the "Experience Method") or 32% of
the Bank's entire net income, computed without regard to this deduction and
reduced by the amount of any
permitted
addition to the Bank's reserve for non-qualifying loans. The Bank's deduction
with respect to non-qualifying loans must be computed pursuant to the Experience
Method. The Bank reviews the most appropriate method of calculating the
deduction attributable to an addition to the tax bad debt reserves each
year.
The
portion of the NYS bad debt reserve in excess of a reserve amount computed
pursuant to the Experience Method is subject to recapture upon a non-dividend
distribution in a manner similar to the recapture of the federal bad debt
reserves for such distributions. In addition, the reserve is subject to
recapture in the event that the Bank fails either to satisfy a thrift
definitional test relating to the composition of its assets or to maintain a
thrift charter.
The NYS
tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2004 was 9.03% of taxable income. This
rate includes a commuter transportation surcharge. In general, the Holding
Company is not required to pay NYS tax on dividends and interest received from
the Bank.
City
of New York. The
Holding Company and the Bank are both subject to a New York City banking
corporation tax of 9% on taxable income allocated to New York City.
New York
City generally conforms its tax law to NYS tax law in the determination of
taxable income (including the laws relating to bad debt reserves). New York City
tax law, however, does not allow a deduction for the carryover of a net
operating loss of a banking company.
State
of Delaware. As a
Delaware holding company not earning income in Delaware, the Holding Company is
exempt from Delaware corporate income tax, however, is required to file an
annual report and pay an annual franchise tax to the State of
Delaware.
The Bank
is subject to extensive regulation, examination, and supervision by the OTS, as
its chartering agency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"),
as its deposit insurer. The Bank's deposit accounts are insured up to applicable
limits by the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF") and the Savings Association Insurance
Fund ("SAIF"), which are administered by the FDIC. The Bank must file reports
with the OTS concerning its activities and financial condition, and must obtain
regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions, such as
mergers with, or acquisitions of, other depository institutions. The OTS
conducts periodic examinations to assess the Bank's safety and soundness and
compliance with various regulatory requirements. This regulation and supervision
establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which a savings
association may engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the
insurance fund and depositors. As a publicly-held unitary savings and loan
holding company, the Holding Company is required to file certain reports with,
and otherwise comply with the rules and regulations of both the SEC, under the
federal securities laws, and the OTS.
The OTS
and the FDIC have significant discretion in connection with their supervisory
and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with
respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan
loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Any change in such policies, whether by
the OTS, the FDIC or the United States Congress, could have a material adverse
impact on the operations of the Company.
The
following discussion is intended to be a summary of the material statutes and
regulations applicable to savings associations and savings and loan holding
companies, and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all such
statutes and regulations.
Business
Activities. The Bank
derives its lending and investment powers from the Home Owner's Loan Act, as
amended (''HOLA''), and the regulations of the OTS enacted thereunder. Pursuant
thereto, the Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by residential and
commercial real estate, commercial and consumer loans, certain types of debt
securities, and certain other assets. The Bank may also establish service
corporations that may engage in activities not otherwise permissible for the
Bank, including certain real estate equity investments and securities and
insurance brokerage activities. The investment powers are subject to various
limitations, including a: (i) prohibition against the acquisition of any
corporate debt security not rated in one of the four highest rating categories;
(ii) limit of 400% of capital on the aggregate amount of loans secured by
commercial property; (iii) limit of 20% of assets on commercial loans, with the
amount of commercial loans in excess of 10% of assets being limited to small
business loans; (iv) limit of 35% of assets on the aggregate amount of consumer
loans and acquisitions of certain debt securities; (v) limit of 5% of assets on
non-conforming loans (i.e., loans
in excess of specified amounts); and (vi) limit of the greater of 5% of assets
or capital on certain construction loans made for the purpose of financing
property which is, or is expected to become, residential.
Loans to One Borrower. Under
HOLA, savings associations are generally subject to the same limits on loans to
one borrower as are imposed on national banks. Generally, pursuant to these
limits, a savings association may not make a loan or extend credit to a single
or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of the association's unimpaired
capital and unimpaired surplus. Additional amounts may be advanced, not in
excess of 10% of unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus, if such loans or
extensions of credit are fully secured by readily-marketable collateral. Such
collateral is defined to include certain debt and equity securities and bullion,
but generally does not include real estate. At December 31, 2004, the
Bank's limit on loans to one borrower was $68.1 million. The Bank's largest
aggregate amount of loans to one borrower on that date was $33.9 million and the
second largest borrower had an aggregate balance of $33.2 million.
QTL Test. HOLA
requires savings associations to satisfy a QTL test. A savings association may
satisfy the QTL test by maintaining at least 65% of its ''portfolio assets'' in
certain ''qualified thrift investments'' during at least nine months of the most
recent twelve-month period. ''Portfolio assets'' means, in general, an
association's total assets less the sum of: (a) specified liquid assets up to
20% of total assets, (b) certain intangibles, including goodwill, credit card
relationships and purchased MSR, and (c) the value of property used to conduct
the association's business. ''Qualified thrift investments'' include various
types of loans made for residential and housing purposes, investments related to
such purposes, including certain mortgage-backed and related securities; and
small business, education, and credit card loans. A savings association may
additionally satisfy the QTL test by qualifying as a "domestic building and loan
association" as defined in the Code. At December 31, 2004, the Bank maintained
77.6% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments. The Bank also
satisfied the QTL test in each of the prior 12 months and, therefore, was a QTL.
A savings
association that fails the QTL test must either operate under certain
restrictions on its activities or convert to a bank charter. The initial
restrictions include prohibitions against (a) engaging in any new activity not
permissible for a national bank, (b) paying dividends not permissible under
national bank regulations, and (c) establishing any new branch office in a
location not permissible for a national bank in the association's home state. In
addition, within one year of the date a savings association ceases to satisfy
the QTL test, any company controlling the association must register under, and
become subject to the requirements of, the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as
amended. A savings association that has failed the QTL test may requalify under
the QTL test and be relieved of the limitations, however, may do so only once.
If the savings association does not requalify under the QTL test within three
years after failing the QTL test, it will be required to terminate any activity,
and dispose of any investment, not permissible for a national bank, and repay as
promptly as possible any outstanding Advances from the FHLBNY.
Capital Requirements. OTS
regulations require savings associations to satisfy three minimum capital
standards: (1) a tangible capital ratio of 1.5% of total assets as adjusted
under OTS regulations; (2) a risk-based capital ratio of 8% of risk-based
capital (as defined under OTS regulations) to total risk-based assets (also as
defined under OTS regulations); and (3) a leverage capital ratio (as defined
under OTS regulations). For depository institutions that have been assigned the
highest composite rating of 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating,
the minimum required leverage capital ratio is 3%. For any other depository
institution, the minimum required leverage capital ratio is 4%, unless a higher
leverage capital ratio is warranted by the particular circumstances or risk
profile of the depository institution.
Tangible
capital is defined, generally, as common stockholders' equity (including
retained earnings), certain non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related
earnings, and minority interests in equity accounts of fully consolidated
subsidiaries, less intangibles other than certain purchased MSR and investments
in, and loans to, subsidiaries engaged in activities not permissible for a
national bank.
In
determining the amount of risk-based assets for purposes of the risk-based
capital requirement, a savings association must multiply its assets and certain
off-balance sheet items by risk-weights (which range from 0% for cash and
obligations issued by the United States government or its agencies to 100% for
consumer and commercial loans) as assigned by the OTS capital regulations based
on the risks the OTS believes inherent in the type of asset.
Leverage
capital is defined similarly to tangible capital, however, additionally
includes, among other items, certain qualifying supervisory goodwill and certain
purchased credit card relationships. Supplementary capital includes cumulative
preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible
securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, and the
allowance for possible loan losses. Effective October 1, 1998, the OTS and other
federal banking regulators adopted an amendment to the risk-based capital
guidelines that permits insured depository institutions to include in
supplementary capital up to 45% of the pretax net unrealized holding gains on
certain available-for-sale equity securities, as such gains are computed under
the guidelines. The allowance for loan losses includable in supplementary
capital is limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-based assets, and the amount of
supplementary capital that may be included as total capital may not exceed the
amount of leverage capital.
The
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act ("FDICIA") required that
the OTS and other federal banking agencies revise their risk-based capital
standards, with appropriate transition rules, to ensure that they take into
account interest rate risk ("IRR"), concentration of risk and the risks of
non-traditional activities. Current OTS regulations
do not
include a specific IRR component of the risk-based capital requirement; however,
the OTS monitors the IRR of individual institutions through a variety of
methods, including an analysis of the change in net portfolio value ("NPV"). NPV
is defined as the net present value of the expected future cash flows on an
entity's assets and liabilities and, therefore, hypothetically represents the
value of an institution's net worth. The OTS has also used the NPV analysis as
part of its evaluation of certain applications or notices submitted by thrift
institutions. In addition, OTS Thrift Bulletin 13a provides guidance on the
management of IRR and the responsibility of boards of directors in that area.
The OTS, through its general oversight of the safety and soundness of savings
associations, retains the right to impose minimum capital requirements on
individual institutions to the extent they are not in compliance with certain
written OTS guidelines regarding NPV analysis. The OTS has not imposed any such
requirements on the Company.
The table
below presents the Bank's regulatory capital as compared to the OTS regulatory
capital requirements at December 31, 2004:
|
As
of December 31, 2004 |
|
Actual |
Minimum
Capital Requirement |
|
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
Ratio |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Tangible |
$256,955 |
7.88% |
$48,937 |
1.5% |
Leverage
Capital |
256,955 |
7.88 |
130,498 |
4.0 |
Risk-based
capital |
261,835 |
12.83 |
163,247 |
8.0
|
The
following is a reconciliation of GAAP capital to regulatory capital for the
Bank:
|
At
December 31, 2004 |
|
Tangible
Capital |
Leverage
Capital |
Risk-Based
Capital |
GAAP
capital |
$309,190 |
$309,190 |
$309,190 |
Non-allowable
assets: |
|
|
|
Core
deposit intangible |
(48) |
(48) |
(48) |
Loan
servicing asset |
(250) |
(250) |
(250) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive income |
3,701 |
3,701 |
3,701 |
Goodwill |
(55,638) |
(55,638) |
(55,638) |
General
valuation allowance |
- |
- |
15,543 |
Adjustment
for recourse provision on loans sold |
- |
- |
(10,663) |
Regulatory
capital |
256,955 |
256,955 |
261,835 |
Minimum
capital requirement |
48,937 |
130,498 |
163,247 |
Regulatory
capital excess |
$208,018 |
$126,457 |
$98,588 |
Limitation on Capital Distributions.
OTS
regulations impose limitations upon capital distributions by savings
associations, such as cash dividends, payments to purchase or otherwise acquire
its shares, payments to shareholders of another institution in a cash-out
merger, and other distributions charged against capital.
As the
subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, the Bank is required to file a
notice with the OTS at least 30 days prior to each capital distribution.
However, if the total amount of all capital distributions (including each
proposed capital distribution) for the applicable calendar year exceeds net
income for that year plus the retained net income for the preceding two years,
then the Bank must file an application for OTS approval of a proposed capital
distribution. In addition, the OTS can prohibit a proposed capital distribution
otherwise permissible under the regulation if it determines that the association
is in need of greater than customary supervision or that a proposed distribution
would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. Furthermore, under OTS prompt
corrective action regulations, the Bank would be prohibited from making a
capital distribution if, after the distribution, the Bank failed to satisfy its
minimum capital requirements, as described above (See ''Regulation - Regulation of Federal Savings
Associations - Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action''). In addition, pursuant
to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act ("FDIA"), an insured depository institution
such as the Bank is prohibited from making capital distributions, including the
payment of dividends, if, after making such distribution, the institution would
become "undercapitalized" as defined in the FDIA.
Assessments. Savings
associations are required by OTS regulation to pay semi-annual assessments to
the OTS to fund its operations. The regulations base the assessment for
individual savings associations, other than those with total assets never
exceeding $100.0 million, on three components: the size of the association (on
which the basic assessment is based); the association's supervisory condition,
which results in percentage increases for any savings institution with a
composite rating of 3, 4 or 5 in its most recent safety and soundness
examination; and the complexity of the association's operations, which results
in percentage increases for a savings association that managed over $1 billion
in trust assets, serviced loans for other institutions aggregating more than $1
billion, or had certain off-balance sheet assets aggregating more than $1
billion.
Branching.
Subject
to certain limitations, HOLA and OTS regulations permit federally chartered
savings associations to establish branches in any state of the United States.
The authority to establish such a branch is available: (a) in states that
expressly authorize branches of savings associations located in another state,
and (b) to an association that either satisfies the QTL test or qualifies as a
''domestic building and loan association'' under the Code, which imposes
qualification requirements similar to those for a QTL under HOLA (See "Item 1 - Business - Regulation - Regulation of Federal
Savings Associations - QTL Test''). HOLA and OTS regulations preempt any
state law purporting to regulate branching by federal savings associations.
Community
Reinvestment. Under the
Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA"), as implemented by OTS regulations, a savings
association possesses a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with
its safe and sound operation, to help satisfy the credit needs of its entire
community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA does not
establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions
nor does it limit an institution's discretion to develop the types of products
and services it believes are best suited to its particular community. The CRA
requires the OTS, in connection with its examination of a savings association,
to assess the association's record of satisfying the credit needs of its
community and consider such record in its evaluation of certain applications by
the association. The assessment is composed of three tests: (a) a lending test,
to evaluate the institution's record of making loans in its service areas; (b)
an investment test, to evaluate the institution's record of investing in
community development projects, affordable housing, and programs benefiting low
or moderate income individuals and businesses; and (c) a service test, to
evaluate the institution's delivery of services through its branches, automated
teller machines and other offices. A regulation recently adopted by the OTS
allows a savings association to elect alternative weights for each of the three
tests as long as a weight of 50% or more is applied to the lending test. The CRA
also requires all institutions to make public disclosure of their CRA ratings.
The Bank received an "Outstanding" CRA rating in its most recent examination.
The
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 ("Gramm-Leach") and its implementing regulations
require that insured depository institutions publicly disclose certain
agreements that are in fulfillment of the CRA. The Bank had no such agreements
in place at December 31, 2004.
Transactions
with Related Parties. The
Bank's authority to engage in transactions with its ''affiliates'' is limited by
OTS regulations and Sections 23A, 23B, 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve
Act (''FRA''), Regulation W issued by the Federal Reserve Board ("FRB"), as well
as additional limitations adopted by the Director of the OTS. OTS regulations
regarding transactions with affiliates conform to Regulation W. In general, an
affiliate of the Bank is any company that controls the Bank or any other company
that is controlled by a company that controls the Bank, excluding the Bank's
subsidiaries other than those that are insured depository institutions. A
subsidiary of a bank that is not also a depository institution is currently
generally not treated as an affiliate of the bank for purposes of Sections 23A
and 23B, however, the Federal Reserve Bank has proposed treating any subsidiary
of a bank that is engaged in activities not permissible for bank holding
companies under the Bank Holding Company Act ("BHC Act") as an affiliate for
purposes of Sections 23A and 23B. OTS regulations prohibit a savings association
from (a) lending to any of its affiliates that are engaged in activities not
permissible for bank holding companies under Section 4(c) of the BHC Act, and
(b) purchasing the securities of any affiliate other than a subsidiary. Section
23A limits the aggregate amount of transactions with any individual affiliate to
10% of the capital and surplus of the savings association and also limits the
aggregate amount of transactions with all affiliates to 20% of the savings
association's capital and surplus. Extensions of credit to affiliates are
required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type described in
Section 23A, and the purchase of low quality assets from affiliates is generally
prohibited. Section 23B provides that certain transactions with affiliates,
including loans and asset purchases, must be on terms and under circumstances,
including credit standards, that are substantially the same, or at least as
favorable to the association, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with nonaffiliated companies. In the absence of comparable
transactions, such transactions may only occur under terms and circumstances,
including credit standards, that in good faith would be offered, or would apply,
to nonaffiliated companies.
OTS
regulations include additional restrictions on savings associations under
Section 11 of HOLA, including provisions prohibiting a savings association from:
(i) advancing a loan to an affiliate engaged in non-bank holding company
activities; and (ii) purchasing or investing in securities issued by an
affiliate that is not a subsidiary. The OTS regulations also include certain
exemptions from these prohibitions. The FRB and the OTS require each depository
institution that was subject to Sections 23A and 23B to implement policies and
procedures to ensure compliance with Regulation W and the OTS regulations
regarding transactions with affiliates. Implementation of these regulations did
not have a material impact upon the financial condition or results of operations
of the Company.
Section
402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley") prohibits the extension
of personal loans to directors and executive officers of issuers (as defined in
Sarbanes-Oxley). The prohibition, however, does not apply to extensions of
credit advanced by an insured depository institution, such as the Bank, that is
subject to the insider lending restrictions of Section 22(h) of the FRA, as
implemented by Regulation O (12 CFR 215).
The
Bank's authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers, and
shareholders owning 10% or more of the Holding Company's outstanding common
stock, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is additionally
governed by the requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the FRA and
Regulation O of the FRB enacted thereunder. Among other matters, these
provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders: (a) be made on terms
substantially the same as, and follow credit underwriting procedures not less
stringent than, those prevailing for comparable transactions with unaffiliated
persons and that do not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or
present other unfavorable features; and (b) not exceed certain amount
limitations individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part,
on the amount of the association's capital. Regulation O additionally requires
that extensions of credit in excess of certain limits be approved in advance by
the association's board of directors. The Company and Bank both presently
prohibit loans to Directors and executive management.
Transactions
between the Bank and the remainder of the Company, and any of their affiliates,
are subject to various conditions and limitations
Enforcement.
Under
FDICIA, the OTS possesses primary enforcement responsibility over
federally-chartered savings associations and has the authority to bring
enforcement action against all ''institution-affiliated parties,'' including any
controlling stockholder or any shareholder, attorney, appraiser or accountant
who knowingly or recklessly participates in any violation of applicable law or
regulation, breach of fiduciary duty or certain other wrongful actions that
cause, or are likely to cause, more than minimal loss or other significant
adverse effect on an insured savings association. Civil penalties cover a wide
series of violations and actions and range from $5,000 for each day during which
violations of law, regulations, orders, and certain written agreements and
conditions continue, up to $1 million per day if the person obtained a
substantial pecuniary gain as a result of such violation or knowingly or
recklessly caused a substantial loss to the institution. Criminal penalties for
certain financial institution crimes include fines of up to $1 million and
imprisonment for up to 30 years. In addition, regulators possess substantial
discretion to take enforcement action against an institution that fails to
comply with regulatory structure, particularly with respect to capital
requirements. Possible enforcement actions range from the imposition of a
capital plan and capital directive to receivership, conservatorship, or the
termination of deposit insurance. Under FDICIA, the FDIC has the authority to
recommend to the Director of the OTS that enforcement action be taken with
respect to a particular savings association. If action is not taken by the
Director, the FDIC possesses authority to take such action under certain
circumstances.
Standards
for Safety and Soundness. Pursuant
to FDICIA, as amended by the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory
Improvement Act of 1994, the OTS, together with the other federal bank
regulatory agencies, has adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and
soundness standards relating to internal controls and information systems,
internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate
risk exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation, fees and
benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other features, appropriate
systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and exposures specified
in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe
and unsound practice and describe compensation as excessive when the amounts
paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an
executive officer, employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, the
OTS adopted regulations pursuant to FDICIA that authorize, but do not require,
the OTS to order an institution that has been given notice by the OTS that it is
not satisfying any of such safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance
plan. If, after being so notified, an institution fails to submit an acceptable
compliance plan or fails in any material respect to implement an accepted
compliance plan, the OTS must issue an order directing action to correct the
deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions of the types to which
an undercapitalized association is subject under the ''prompt corrective
action'' provisions of FDICIA (See "Item 1 -
Business - Regulation - Regulation of Savings Associations - Prompt Corrective
Regulatory Action"). If an institution fails to comply with such an order,
the OTS may seek enforcement in judicial proceedings and the imposition of civil
money penalties.
Real
Estate Lending Standards. The OTS
and the other federal banking agencies have adopted regulations prescribing
standards for extensions of credit that are (a) secured by real estate, or (b)
made for the purpose of financing the construction of improvements on real
estate. The regulations require each savings association to establish and
maintain written internal real estate lending standards that are consistent with
safe and sound banking practices and appropriate to the size of the association
and the nature and scope of its real estate lending activities. The standards
must additionally conform to accompanying OTS guidelines, which include
loan-to-value ratios for the different types of real estate loans. Associations
are permitted to make a limited amount of loans that do not conform to the
loan-to-value limitations provided such exceptions are reviewed and justified
appropriately. The guidelines additionally contain a number of lending
situations in which exceptions to the loan-to-value standards are permitted.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action.
Under the
OTS prompt corrective action regulations, the OTS is required to take certain,
and authorized to take other, supervisory actions against undercapitalized
savings associations. For this purpose, a savings association is placed in one
of five categories based on the association's capital. Generally, a savings
association is considered ''well capitalized'' if it maintains all of the
following capital ratios: (1) Total capital to risk-based assets of at least
10.0%; (2) Leverage capital to risk-based assets of at least 6.0%; and (3)
Leverage capital to adjusted total assets of at least 5.0%. In addition, in
order to be considered "well capitalized," the savings association cannot be
subject to any order or directive of the OTS to satisfy or maintain specific
capital levels. A savings association is considered ''adequately capitalized''
if it maintains all of the following capital ratios: (1) Total capital to
risk-based assets of at least 8.0%; (2) Leverage capital to risk-based assets of
at least 4.0%; and (3) Leverage capital to adjusted total assets of at least
4.0% (or at least 3.0% if the association received the highest possible overall
rating on its most recent OTS safety and soundness examination). A savings
association is considered "undercapitalized" if it maintains any of the
following capital ratios: (1) Total capital to total risk-based assets of less
than 8.0%; (2) Leverage capital to risk-based assets of less than 4.0%; or (3)
Leverage capital to adjusted total assets of less than 4.0% (or of less than
3.0% if the association received the highest possible overall rating on its most
recent OTS safety and soundness examination). A savings association is
considered "significantly undercapitalized" if it maintains any of the following
capital ratios: (1) Total capital to risk-based assets of less than 6.0%; (2)
Leverage capital to risk-based assets of less than 3.0%; or (3) Leverage capital
to adjusted total assets of less than 3.0%. A savings association that has a
tangible capital to assets ratio equal to or less than 2% is deemed to be
''critically undercapitalized.'' The elements of an association's capital for
purposes of the prompt corrective action regulations are defined generally as
they are under the regulations for minimum capital requirements (See "Item 1 - Business - Regulation - Regulation
of Savings Associations - Capital Requirements''). As of December 31, 2004,
the Bank satisfied all criteria necessary to be categorized "well capitalized"
under the prompt corrective action regulatory framework.
The
severity of the action authorized or required to be taken under the prompt
corrective action regulations increases as an association's capital deteriorates
within the three undercapitalized categories. All associations are prohibited
from paying dividends, other capital distributions or management fees to any
controlling person if, following such distribution, the association would be
undercapitalized. An undercapitalized association is required to file a capital
restoration plan within 45 days of the date the association receives notice that
it falls within any of the three undercapitalized categories. The OTS is
required to monitor closely the condition of an undercapitalized association and
to restrict the asset growth, acquisitions, branching, and new lines of business
of such an association. Significantly undercapitalized associations are subject
to restrictions on compensation of senior executive officers. Such an
association may not, without OTS consent, pay any bonus or provide compensation
to any senior executive officer at a rate exceeding the officer's average rate
of compensation (excluding bonuses, stock options and profit-sharing) during the
12 months preceding the month the association became undercapitalized. A
significantly undercapitalized association may also be subject, among other
actions, to forced changes in the composition of its board of directors or
senior management, additional restrictions on transactions with affiliates,
restrictions on acceptance of deposits from correspondent associations, further
restrictions on asset growth, restrictions on rates paid on deposits, forced
termination or reduction of activities deemed risky, and any further operational
restrictions deemed necessary by the OTS.
If one or
more grounds exist for appointing a conservator or receiver for an association,
the OTS may require the association to issue additional debt or stock, sell
assets, be acquired by a depository association holding company, or combine with
another depository association. The OTS and FDIC possess a broad range of
justifications pursuant to which they may appoint a receiver or conservator for
an insured depository association. Pursuant to FDICIA, the OTS is required to
appoint a receiver (or with the concurrence of the FDIC, a conservator) for a
critically undercapitalized association within 90 days after the association
becomes critically undercapitalized or, with the concurrence of the FDIC, to
take such other action that would better achieve the purposes of the prompt
corrective action provisions. Such alternative action may be renewed for
successive 90-day periods. However, if the association remains critically
undercapitalized on average during the quarter that begins 270 days after it
initially became critically undercapitalized, a receiver must be appointed,
unless the OTS makes certain findings with which the FDIC concurs and the
Director of the OTS and the Chairman of the FDIC certify that the association is
viable. In addition, an association that is critically undercapitalized is
subject to more severe restrictions on its activities, and is prohibited,
without prior approval of the FDIC, from, among other actions, entering into
certain material transactions or paying interest on new or renewed liabilities
at a rate that would significantly increase the association's weighted average
cost of funds.
When
appropriate, the OTS can require corrective action by a savings association
holding company under the ''prompt corrective action'' provisions of FDICIA.
Insurance
of Deposit Accounts. Savings
associations are required to pay a deposit insurance premium. The amount of the
premium is determined based upon a risk-based assessment system. Under the
system, the FDIC assigns an institution to one of three capital categories based
upon the financial information contained in the institution's most current
quarterly financial report filed with the applicable bank regulatory agency
prior to the commencement of the assessment period. The three capital categories
consist of (a) well capitalized, (b) adequately capitalized, or (c)
undercapitalized. The FDIC additionally assigns an institution to one of three
supervisory subcategories within each capital group. The supervisory subgroup to
which an institution is assigned is based upon an evaluation provided to the
FDIC by the institution's primary federal regulator and information that the
FDIC determines to be relevant to the institution's financial condition and the
risk posed to the deposit insurance funds. An institution's assessment rate
depends on the capital category and supervisory subcategory to which it is
assigned. Under the regulations, there are nine assessment risk classifications
(i.e.,
combinations of capital groups and supervisory subgroups) to which different
assessment rates are applied. Assessment rates currently range from 0.0% of
deposits for an institution in the highest category (i.e.,
well-capitalized and financially sound, with no more than a few minor
weaknesses) to 0.27% of deposits for an institution in the lowest category
(i.e.,
undercapitalized and substantial supervisory concern). The FDIC is authorized to
raise the assessment rates as necessary to maintain the required reserve ratio
of 1.25% of assessable deposits. Both the BIF and SAIF currently satisfy the
reserve ratio requirement. If the FDIC determines that assessment rates should
be increased, institutions in all risk categories could be affected. The FDIC
has exercised this authority several times in the past and could raise insurance
assessment rates in the future.
The
Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 amended the FDIA to recapitalize the SAIF
and expand the assessment base for the payments of Financing Corporation
("FICO") bonds. FICO bonds were sold by the federal government in order to
finance the recapitalization of the SAIF and BIF insurance funds that was
necessitated following payments from the funds to compensate depositors of
federally-insured depository institutions that experienced bankruptcy and
dissolution during the 1980's and 1990's. The quarterly adjusted rate of
assessment for FICO bonds is 0.0146% for both BIF-and SAIF-insured institutions.
Privacy
and Security Protection. The OTS
has adopted regulations implementing the privacy protection provisions of
Gramm-Leach. The regulations require financial institutions to adopt procedures
to protect customers and their "non-public personal information." The
regulations require the Bank to disclose its privacy policy, including
identifying with whom it shares "non-public personal information," to customers
at the time of establishing the customer relationship and annually thereafter.
In addition, the Bank is required to provide its customers the ability to
"opt-out" of the sharing of their personal information with unaffiliated third
parties, if the sharing of such information does not satisfy any of the
permitted exceptions. The Bank's existing privacy protection policy complies
with the regulations. Implementation of the regulations did not have a material
impact on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the
Company.
The OTS
and other federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines establishing
standards for safeguarding customer information to implement certain provisions
of Gramm-Leach. The guidelines describe the agencies' expectations for the
creation, implementation and maintenance of an information security program,
including administrative, technical and physical safeguards appropriate to the
size and complexity of the institution and the nature and scope of its
activities. The standards set forth in the guidelines are intended to insure the
security and confidentiality of customer records and information, protect
against anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such
records and unauthorized access to or use of such records or information that
could result in substantial customer harm or inconvenience. The Bank has
implemented these guidelines, which did not have a material impact on the
business, financial condition or results of operations of the
Company.
Gramm-Leach
additionally permits each state to enact legislation that is more protective of
consumers' personal information. Currently, there are a number of privacy bills
pending in the New York legislature. Management of the Company cannot predict
the impact, if any, these bills will have if enacted.
Internet
Banking. Technological
developments are dramatically altering the methods by which most companies,
including financial institutions, conduct their business. The growth of the
Internet is prompting banks to reconsider business strategies and adopt
alternative distribution and marketing systems. The federal banking regulatory
agencies have conducted seminars and published materials targeted at various
aspects of Internet banking and have indicated their intention to re-evaluate
their regulations to ensure they encourage bank efficiency and competitiveness
consistent with safe and sound banking practices. The Company cannot assure that
federal bank regulatory agencies will not adopt new regulations that will not
materially affect or restrict the Bank's Internet operations.
Insurance
Activities. As a
federal savings bank, the Bank is generally permitted to engage in certain
insurance activities through subsidiaries. OTS regulations promulgated pursuant
to Gramm-Leach prohibit depository institutions from conditioning the extension
of credit to individuals upon either the purchase of an insurance product or
annuity or an agreement by the consumer not to purchase an insurance product or
annuity from an entity not affiliated with the depository institution. The
regulations additionally require prior disclosure of this prohibition if such
products are offered to credit applicants. Implementation of these regulations
did not have a material impact upon the financial condition or results of
operations of the Company.
FHLB
System. The Bank
is a member of the FHLBNY, which is one of the twelve regional FHLB's composing
the FHLB System. Each FHLB provides a central credit facility primarily for its
member institutions. Any Advances from the FHLBNY must be secured by specified
types of collateral, and long-term Advances may be obtained only for the purpose
of providing funds for residential housing finance. The Bank, as a member of the
FHLBNY, is currently required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the
FHLBNY in an amount equal to the greater of: (i) $500; (ii) 1% of the unpaid
principal balance of residential mortgage loans and contracts and other mortgage
related assets at the beginning of each year; or (iii) 5% of the Bank's
aggregate outstanding Advances from the FHLBNY. The Bank is in compliance with
these requirements.
Federal
Reserve System. The Bank
is subject to provisions of the FRA and FRB regulations pursuant to which
depository institutions may be required to maintain non-interest-earning
reserves against their deposit accounts and certain other liabilities.
Currently, reserves must be maintained against transaction accounts (primarily
NOW and regular checking accounts). FRB regulations generally require that
reserves be maintained in the amount of 3% of the aggregate of transaction
accounts between $7.0 million and $47.6 million (subject to adjustment by the
FRB) plus a reserve of 10% (subject to adjustment by the FRB between 8% and 14%
against the portion of total transaction accounts in excess of $47.6 million.
The initial $7.0 million of otherwise reservable balances are currently exempt
from the reserve requirements, however, the exemption is adjusted by the FRB at
the end of each year. The Bank is in compliance with the foregoing reserve
requirements.
Because
required reserves must be maintained in the form of either vault cash, a
non-interest-bearing account at a Federal Reserve Bank, or a pass-through
account as defined by the FRB, the effect of this reserve requirement is to
reduce the Bank's interest-earning assets. The balances maintained to satisfy
the FRB reserve requirements may be used to satisfy liquidity requirements
imposed by the OTS.
FRB
members are additionally authorized to borrow from the Federal Reserve
''discount window,'' however, FRB regulations require such institutions to hold
reserves in the form of vault cash or deposits with Federal Reserve Banks in
order to borrow.
Anti-Money
Laundering and Customer Identification. The
Company is subject to OTS regulations implementing the Uniting and Strengthening
America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act of 2001 ("PATRIOT Act"). The PATRIOT Act provides the federal
government with powers to address terrorist threats through enhanced domestic
security measures, expanded surveillance powers, increased information sharing
and broadened anti-money laundering requirements. By way of amendments to the
Bank Secrecy Act, Title III of the PATRIOT Act enacts measures intended to
encourage information sharing among bank regulatory and law enforcement
agencies. In addition, certain provisions of Title III and the related OTS
regulations impose affirmative obligations on a broad range of financial
institutions, including banks and thrifts. Title III imposes the following
requirements, among others, with respect to financial institutions: (i)
establishment of anti-money laundering programs; (ii) establishment of
procedures for obtaining identifying information from customers opening new
accounts, including verifying their identity within a reasonable period of time;
(iii) establishment of enhanced due diligence policies, procedures and controls
designed to detect and report money laundering; and (iv) prohibition on
correspondent accounts for foreign shell banks and compliance with recordkeeping
obligations with respect to correspondent accounts of foreign
banks.
In
addition, bank regulators are directed to consider a holding company's
effectiveness in preventing money laundering when ruling on FRA and Bank Merger
Act applications.
The
Holding Company is a non-diversified unitary savings and loan holding company
within the meaning of HOLA. As such, it is required to register with the OTS and
is subject to OTS regulations, examinations, supervision and reporting
requirements. In addition, the OTS has enforcement authority over the Holding
Company's non-savings association subsidiaries. Among other effects, this
authority permits the OTS to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined
to be a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness, or stability of a
subsidiary savings association.
HOLA
prohibits a savings association holding company, directly or indirectly, or
through one or more subsidiaries, from acquiring another savings association or
holding company thereof, without prior written approval of the OTS; acquiring or
retaining, with certain exceptions, more than 5% of a non-subsidiary savings
association, non-subsidiary holding company, or non-subsidiary company engaged
in activities other than those permitted by HOLA; or acquiring or retaining
control of a depository institution that is not insured by the FDIC. In
evaluating an application by a holding company to acquire a savings association,
the OTS must consider the financial and managerial resources and future
prospects of the company and savings association involved, the effect of the
acquisition on the risk to the insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the
community, and competitive factors.
As a
unitary savings and loan holding company, the Holding Company generally is not
restricted under existing laws as to the types of business activities in which
it may engage, provided that the Bank continues to satisfy the QTL test (See "Item 1 - Business - Regulation - Regulation of Federal
Savings Associations - QTL Test'' for a discussion of the QTL requirements).
Upon any non-supervisory acquisition by the Holding Company of another savings
association or a savings bank that satisfies the QTL test and is deemed to be a
savings association by the OTS and that will be held as a separate subsidiary,
the Holding Company will become a multiple savings association holding company
and will be subject to limitations on the types of business activities in which
it may engage. HOLA limits the activities of a multiple savings association
holding company and its non-insured association subsidiaries primarily to
activities permissible for bank holding companies under Section 4(c)(8) of the
BHC Act, subject to prior approval of the OTS, and to other activities
authorized by OTS regulation.
The OTS
is prohibited from approving any acquisition that would result in a multiple
savings association holding company controlling savings associations in more
than one state, subject to two exceptions: an acquisition of a savings
association in another state (a) in a supervisory transaction, or (b) pursuant
to authority under the laws of the state of the association to be acquired that
specifically permit such acquisitions. The conditions imposed upon interstate
acquisitions by those states that have enacted authorizing legislation
vary.
Gramm-Leach
additionally restricts the powers of new unitary savings and loan association
holding companies. A unitary savings and loan holding company that is
"grandfathered," i.e., became
a unitary savings and loan holding company pursuant to an application filed with
the OTS prior to May 4, 1999, such as the Holding Company, retains the authority
it possessed under the law in existence as of May 4, 1999. All other savings and
loan holding companies are limited to financially related activities permissible
for bank holding companies, as defined under Gramm-Leach. Gramm-Leach also
prohibits non-financial companies from acquiring grandfathered savings and loan
association holding companies.
The
Holding Company's common stock is registered with the SEC under Section 12(g) of
the Exchange Act. It is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider
trading restrictions and other requirements under the Exchange Act.
The
headquarters of both the Holding Company and the Bank are located at 209
Havemeyer Street, Brooklyn, New York 11211. The headquarters building is fully
owned by the Bank. The Bank conducts its business through twenty full-service
retail banking offices located throughout Brooklyn, Queens, the Bronx and Nassau
County, New York.
The
Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than legal
actions arising in the ordinary course of business which, in the aggregate,
involve amounts which are believed to be material to its financial condition and
results of operations.
None.
PART
II
The
Holding Company's common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market and
quoted under the symbol "DCOM." Prior to June 15, 1998, the Holding Company's
common stock was quoted under the symbol "DIME."
The
following table indicates the high and low sales price for the Holding Company's
common stock and dividends declared during the periods indicated. The Holding
Company's common stock began trading on June 26, 1996, the date of the initial
public offering. All amounts have been adjusted to reflect the Company's 50%
stock dividends paid on August 21, 2001, April 24, 2002 and March 16,
2004.
|
Twelve
Months Ended
December
31, 2004 |
|
Twelve
Months Ended
December
31, 2003 |
Quarter
Ended |
Dividends
Declared |
High
Sales
Price |
Low
Sales
Price |
|
Dividends
Declared |
High
Sales
Price |
Low
Sales
Price |
March
31st |
$0.13 |
$21.38 |
$19.67 |
|
$0.09 |
$15.66 |
$12.40 |
June
30th |
0.14 |
20.81 |
15.97 |
|
0.09 |
17.56 |
14.85 |
September
30th |
0.14 |
17.61 |
15.60 |
|
0.11 |
18.67 |
15.33 |
December
31st |
0.14 |
18.78 |
16.04 |
|
0.11 |
21.27 |
15.35 |
On
December 31, 2004, the final trading date in the fiscal year, the Holding
Company's common stock closed at $17.91.
Management
estimates that the Holding Company had approximately 3,200 shareholders
of record as of March 11, 2005, including persons or entities holding stock in
nominee or street name through various brokers and banks. There were 37,165,740
shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2004.
On August
21, 2001, the Holding Company paid a 50% common stock dividend to all
shareholders of record as of July 31, 2001. On April 24, 2002, the Holding
Company paid a 50% common stock dividend to all shareholders of record as of
April 1, 2002. On March 16, 2004, the Holding Company paid a 50% common stock
dividend to all shareholders of record as of March 1, 2004. Each of these
dividends had the effect of a three-for-two stock split.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Holding Company paid cash dividends
totaling $19.7 million, representing $0.55 per outstanding common share. During
the year ended December 31, 2003, the Holding Company paid cash dividends
totaling $15.8 million, representing $0.41 per outstanding common share.
On
January 20, 2005, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.14 per
common share to all shareholders of record as of January 31, 2005. This dividend
was paid on February 15, 2005.
The
Holding Company is subject to the requirements of Delaware law, which generally
limits dividends to an amount equal to the excess of net assets (the amount by
which total assets exceed total liabilities) over statutory capital, or if no
such excess exists, to net profits for the current and/or immediately preceding
fiscal year.
In April
2000, the Holding Company issued $25.0 million in subordinated notes payable,
with a stated annual coupon rate of 9.25%. It is required, pursuant to the
provisions of the notes, to first satisfy the interest obligation on the notes,
which approximates $2.4 million annually, prior to the authorization and payment
of common stock cash dividends. Management of the Holding Company does not
believe that this requirement will materially affect its ability to pay
dividends to its common shareholders.
In March
2004, the Holding Company issued $72.2 million in trust preferred debt, with a
stated annual coupon rate of 7.0%. It is required, pursuant to the provisions of
the debt, to first satisfy the interest obligation on the debt, which
approximates $5.1 million annually, prior to the authorization and payment of
common stock cash dividends. Management of the Holding Company does not believe
that this requirement will materially affect its ability to pay dividends to its
common shareholders.
During the three months
ended December 31, 2004, the Holding Company purchased 307,504 shares of its
common stock into treasury. These repurchases were made under the Company's
Tenth Stock Repurchase Program, which was publicly announced on May 20, 2004.
A summary
of the shares repurchased by month is as follows:
Period |
Total
Number
Shares
Purchased |
|
Average
Price
Paid Per Share |
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced
Programs |
|
Maximum
Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the
Programs |
October
2004 |
80,000 |
|
$16.97 |
|
80,000 |
|
1,645,060 |
November
2004 |
116,404 |
|
17.34 |
|
116,404 |
|
1,528,656 |
December
2004 |
111,100 |
|
17.87 |
|
111,100 |
|
1,417,556 |
Financial
Highlights
(Dollars
in Thousands, except per share data)
The
consolidated financial and other data of the Company as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the years ended June 30, 2002, 2001, and 2000,
and the six months ended December 31, 2002 set forth below is derived in part
from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company's audited Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes thereto. The consolidated financial and other
data for the year ended December 31, 2002 is unaudited. Amounts as of and for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the six months ended
December 31, 2002, and the years ended June 30, 2002, 2001, and 2000 have been
reclassified to conform to the December 31, 2004 presentation.
|
At
or for the Twelve Months
Ended
December 31, |
|
At
or for the Six Months Ended December 31, |
|
At
or for the Twelve Months
Ended
June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
Selected
Financial Condition Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets |
$3,377,266 |
$2,971,661 |
$2,946,374 |
|
$2,946,374 |
|
$2,810,132 |
$2,721,744 |
$2,502,139 |
Loans,
net (1) |
2,486,262 |
2,177,622 |
2,154,619 |
|
2,154,619 |
|
2,104,884 |
1,944,902 |
1,706,515 |
Mortgage-backed
securities |
519,885 |
462,737 |
362,952 |
|
362,952 |
|
291,488 |
438,447 |
442,690 |
Investment
securities (2) |
80,750 |
64,517 |
140,279 |
|
140,279 |
|
173,818 |
139,523 |
181,033 |
Federal
funds sold and other
short-term
investments |
103,291 |
95,286 |
114,291 |
|
114,291 |
|
76,474 |
36,619 |
9,449 |
Goodwill |
55,638 |
55,638 |
55,638 |
|
55,638 |
|
55,638 |
55,638 |
60,254 |
Deposits |
2,210,049 |
2,041,678 |
1,927,175 |
|
1,927,175 |
|
1,780,034 |
1,428,432 |
1,219,148 |
Borrowings |
809,249 |
571,675 |
675,541 |
|
675,541 |
|
697,717 |
995,288 |
1,014,027 |
Stockholders'
equity |
281,721 |
283,919 |
265,737 |
|
265,737 |
|
249,741 |
227,116 |
207,169 |
Tangible
Stockholders' equity |
229,013 |
228,026 |
206,325 |
|
206,325 |
|
189,827 |
164,513 |
149,464 |
Selected
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income |
$163,621 |
$169,115 |
$181,914 |
|
$90,469 |
|
$184,581 |
$181,648 |
$165,623 |
Interest
expense on deposits and
borrowings |
67,776 |
71,063 |
91,790 |
|
43,278 |
|
102,244 |
114,043 |
98,820 |
Net
interest income |
95,845 |
98,052 |
90,124 |
|
47,191 |
|
82,337 |
67,605 |
66,803 |
Provision
for losses |
280 |
288 |
240 |
|
120 |
|
240 |
740 |
240 |
Net
interest income after provision for
loan losses |
95,565 |
97,764 |
89,884 |
|
47,071 |
|
82,097 |
66,865 |
66,563 |
Non-interest
income |
20,513 |
25,122 |
19,999 |
|
10,765 |
|
14,837 |
9,292 |
5,043 |
Non-interest
expense |
42,407 |
40,809 |
38,696 |
|
20,368 |
|
35,431 |
35,096 |
34,015 |
Income
before income tax |
73,671 |
82,077 |
71,187 |
|
37,468 |
|
61,503 |
41,061 |
37,591 |
Income
tax expense |
27,449 |
30,801 |
26,565 |
|
14,008 |
|
22,826 |
15,821 |
15,217 |
Net
income |
$46,222 |
$51,276 |
$44,622 |
|
$23,460 |
|
$38,677 |
$25,240 |
$22,374 |
(1) |
Loans,
net represents gross loans (including loans held for sale) less net
deferred loan fees and allowance for loan
losses. |
(2) |
Amount
includes investment in FHLBNY capital
stock. |
|
At
or for the Twelve Months
Ended
December 31, |
|
At
or for the Six Months Ended December 31, |
|
At
or for the Twelve Months Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL RATIOS AND OTHER DATA (3): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return
on average assets |
1.38% |
1.67% |
1.57% |
|
1.62% |
|
1.40% |
0.97% |
0.93% |
Return
on average stockholders' equity |
16.76 |
18.76 |
17.65 |
|
18.17 |
|
16.07 |
11.67 |
10.65 |
Stockholders'
equity to total assets at end
of period |
8.34 |
9.55 |
9.02 |
|
9.02 |
|
8.89 |
8.34 |
8.28 |
Tangible
equity to tangible assets
at end of period |
6.88 |
7.82 |
7.15 |
|
7.15 |
|
6.90 |
6.19 |
6.11 |
Loans
to deposits at end of period |
113.20 |
107.39 |
112.60 |
|
112.60 |
|
119.11 |
137.24 |
141.18 |
Loans
to interest-earning assets at
end of period |
78.04 |
77.89 |
77.85 |
|
77.85 |
|
79.65 |
76.13 |
73.10 |
Net
interest spread (4) |
2.77 |
3.08 |
2.93 |
|
3.07 |
|
2.70 |
2.32 |
2.48 |
Net
interest margin (5) |
3.00 |
3.36 |
3.33 |
|
3.41 |
|
3.12 |
2.76 |
2.91 |
Average
interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities |
110.79 |
111.60 |
111.64 |
|
111.88 |
|
110.99 |
109.33 |
110.04 |
Non-interest
expense to average assets |
1.27 |
1.33 |
1.36 |
|
1.40 |
|
1.28 |
1.35 |
1.41 |
Core
non-interest expense to average
assets (6) |
1.24 |
1.30 |
1.28 |
|
1.37 |
|
1.25 |
1.14 |
1.24 |
Efficiency
ratio (7) |
36.67 |
33.05 |
36.49 |
|
36.41 |
|
37.29 |
46.25 |
46.33 |
Core
efficiency ratio (6) (7) |
35.96 |
32.38 |
34.44 |
|
35.67 |
|
36.42 |
39.08 |
40.77 |
Effective
tax rate |
37.26 |
37.53 |
37.32 |
|
37.39 |
|
37.11 |
38.53 |
40.48 |
Dividend
payout ratio |
42.97 |
30.10 |
25.00 |
|
25.81 |
|
24.61 |
33.63 |
34.74 |
Per
Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share |
$1.28 |
$1.37 |
$1.17 |
|
$0.62 |
|
$1.03 |
$0.67 |
$0.56 |
Cash
dividends paid per share |
0.55 |
0.41 |
0.29 |
|
0.16 |
|
0.25 |
0.23 |
0.19 |
Book
value per share |
7.58 |
7.45 |
6.91 |
|
6.91 |
|
6.45 |
5.94 |
5.26 |
Tangible
book value per share |
6.16 |
5.98 |
5.36 |
|
5.36 |
|
4.90 |
4.30 |
3.79 |
Asset
Quality Ratios and Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
charge-offs |
$133 |
$29 |
$274 |
|
$32 |
|
$329 |
$66 |
$536 |
Total
non-performing loans |
1,459 |
525 |
2,116 |
|
2,116 |
|
2,123 |
3,058 |
4,421 |
Other
real estate owned, net |
- |
- |
134 |
|
134 |
|
114 |
370 |
381 |
Non-performing
loans to total loans |
0.06% |
0.02% |
0.10% |
|
0.10% |
|
0.10% |
0.16% |
0.26% |
Non-performing
loans and real estate
owned to total assets |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.08 |
|
0.08 |
|
0.08 |
0.13 |
0.19 |
Allowance
for Loan Losses to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing
loans |
1,065.32% |
2,860.57% |
730.53% |
|
730.53% |
|
723.98% |
505.53% |
334.43% |
Total
loans (8) |
0.62 |
0.68 |
0.71 |
|
0.71 |
|
0.72 |
0.79 |
0.86 |
Regulatory
Capital Ratios:
(Bank only) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible
capital |
7.88% |
7.97% |
7.19% |
|
7.19% |
|
6.91% |
6.10% |
5.76% |
Leverage
capital |
7.88 |
7.97 |
7.19 |
|
7.19 |
|
6.91 |
6.10 |
5.76 |
Risk-based
capital |
12.83 |
15.03 |
13.17 |
|
13.17 |
|
12.94 |
12.57 |
11.62 |
Earnings
to Fixed Charges Ratios (9): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including
interest on deposits |
2.09x |
2.15x |
1.78x |
|
1.87x |
|
1.60x |
1.36x |
1.38x |
Excluding
interest on deposits |
3.46 |
3.50 |
2.49 |
|
2.73 |
|
2.16 |
1.64 |
1.70 |
Full
Service Branches |
20 |
20 |
20 |
|
20 |
|
20 |
18 |
18 |
(3) |
With
the exception of end of period ratios, all ratios are based on average
daily balances during the indicated periods. Asset Quality Ratios and
Regulatory Capital Ratios are end of period
ratios. |
(4) The net
interest spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on
interest-earning assets and the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
(5) The net
interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average
interest-earning assets.
(6) In
calculating these ratios, amortization expense related to goodwill and the core
deposit intangible is excluded from non-interest expense
(7) The
efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense as a percentage of the sum of
net interest income and non-interest income, excluding any gains or losses on
sales of
assets.
(8) Total
loans represents loans, net, plus the allowance for loan losses.
(9) For
purposes of computing the ratios of earnings to fixed charges, earnings
represent income before taxes, extraordinary items and the cumulative effect of
accounting
changes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges represent total interest expense,
including and excluding interest on deposits.
Executive
Summary
The
Holding Company’s primary business is the operation of the Bank. The Company’s
consolidated results of operations are dependent primarily on net interest
income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on
interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest expense
paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. The Bank
additionally generates non-interest income such as service charges and other
fees, as well as income associated with the Bank’s purchase of Bank Owned Life
Insurance (“BOLI”). Non-interest expense primarily consists of employee
compensation and benefits, federal deposit insurance premiums, data processing
fees, marketing expenses and other operating expenses. The Company’s
consolidated results of operations are also significantly affected by general
economic and competitive conditions (particularly fluctuations in market
interest rates), government policies, changes in accounting standards and
actions of regulatory agencies.
The
Bank’s primary strategy is to increase its household and deposit market shares
in the communities which it serves, either through direct marketing,
acquisitions or purchases of deposits. The Bank also seeks to increase its
product and service utilization for each individual depositor. In addition, the
Bank’s primary strategy includes the origination of, and investment in, mortgage
loans, with an emphasis on multifamily residential and commercial real estate
loans, reflecting the fact that a significant portion of the housing in the
Bank's primary lending area is multifamily. Recently, the Bank has increased its
portfolio of loans secured by mixed-use properties typically comprised of ground
level commercial units and residential apartments on the upper floors.
The
Company believes that multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans
provide advantages as investment assets. Initially, they offer a higher yield
than investment securities of comparable maturities or terms to repricing.
Origination and processing costs for the Bank’s multifamily residential and
commercial real estate loans are lower per thousand dollars of originations than
comparable one-to four-family loan costs. In addition, the Bank’s market area
has generally provided a stable flow of new and refinanced multifamily
residential and commercial real estate loan originations. In order to address
the higher credit risk associated with multifamily residential and commercial
real estate lending, the Bank has developed underwriting standards that it
believes are reliable in order to maintain consistent credit quality for its
loans.
The Bank
also strives to provide a stable source of liquidity and earnings through the
purchase of investment grade securities; seeks to maintain the asset quality of
its loans and other investments; and uses appropriate portfolio and
asset/liability management techniques in an effort to manage the effects of
interest rate volatility on its profitability and capital. In 2004, the Company
experienced modest growth in assets, primarily in MBS available for sale and
commercial real estate loans secured by mixed-use properties. Increases in real
estate loan origination levels were driven by the continuation of low interest
rates during 2003 and 2004, which were partially offset by an increase in
principal repayments on loans and MBS resulting from increased customer
refinance activities. Deposits grew in 2004 due to the success of various sales
and marketing activities during the period, primarily for CDs and money market
accounts.
Prior to
January 2004, the overall low interest rate environment resulted in a greater
decline in the average cost of interest bearing liabilities than the average
yield on interest earning assets. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the
continued low interest rate environment created the opposite effect, resulting
in a greater decline in the average yield on interest earning assets than in the
average cost of interest bearing liabilities. Additionally, both an increase in
short-term interest rates during the latter part of the year ended December 31,
2004 and the 7.0% coupon trust preferred borrowing issued by the Company in
March 2004 added to interest expense on borrowed funds during the year. As a
result, both the net interest spread and the net interest margin, which had
increased during most of 2002 and 2003, declined during the year ended December
31, 2004 when compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. Also contributing to
the decline in net income during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to
the year ended December 31, 2003 was a $5.6 million decline in multifamily
residential and commercial real estate loan prepayment fees.
The
tightening of monetary policy by the FOMC during the second half of 2004
resulted in a narrowing spread between short and long-term interest rates, which
negatively impacted the Company's earnings during 2004. Absent any future change
in interest rates, the narrowing of spreads between long and short-term interest
rates is currently expected to negatively impact the Company's earnings during
the years ending December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, since the Company will
experience a greater level of re-pricing of interest-bearing liabilities
compared to interest-earning assets. (See "Item 7A. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Interest Sensitivity GAP").
Management believes that by funding a large portion of its long-term investments
with core deposits, which have historically been less sensitive to interest rate
fluctuations than wholesale funding, the negative impact upon the Company's
future earnings that would otherwise result from the narrowing spread between
short and long-term interest rates, could be partially mitigated. In addition,
in the event that the spread between long and short-term interest rates were to
increase during the years ending December 31, 2005 and 2006, the Company has
attempted to position itself to benefit from this occurrence by: (i) not fully
deploying its strong capital position during the low interest rate environments
of 2003 and 2004; and (ii) maintaining a short-duration securities portfolio
that is expected to provide a steady source of liquidity during 2005 and
2006.
Various
elements of the Company’s accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently
subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective
assessments. The Company’s policies with respect to the methodologies it uses to
determine the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of MSR and asset
impairment judgments (including the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets
and other than temporary declines in the value of securities), and loan income
recognition are the Company’s most critical accounting policies because they are
important to the presentation of the Company’s financial condition and results
of operations, involve a high degree of complexity and require management to
make difficult and subjective judgments which often require assumptions or
estimates about highly uncertain matters. The use of different judgments,
assumptions and estimates could result in material variations in the Company's
results of operations or financial condition.
The
following is a description of the Company's critical accounting policies and an
explanation of the methods and assumptions underlying their application. These
policies and their application are reviewed periodically and at least annually
with the Audit Committees of the Holding Company and the Bank.
Allowance
for Loan Losses. The loan
loss reserve methodology consists of several key components, including a review
of the two elements of the Bank's loan portfolio, classified loans (i.e.,
non-performing loans, troubled-debt restructuring and impaired loans under
Amended SFAS 114) and performing loans. At December 31, 2004, the majority of
the allowance for loan losses was allocated to performing loans, which
represented the overwhelming majority of the Bank's loan portfolio.
Performing
loans are reviewed at least quarterly based upon the premise that there are
losses inherent within the loan portfolio that have not been identified as of
the date for which the review has been performed. As a result, the Bank
calculates an allowance for loan losses related to its performing loans by
deriving an expected loan loss percentage and applying it to its performing
loans. In deriving the expected loan loss percentage, the Bank considers the
following criteria: the Bank's historical loss experience; the age and payment
history of the loans (commonly referred to as their "seasoned quality"); the
type of loan (i.e., one- to
four-family, multifamily residential, commercial real estate, cooperative
apartment, construction or consumer); the underwriting history of the loan
(i.e.,
whether it was underwritten by the Bank or a predecessor institution acquired
subsequently by the Bank and, therefore, originally subjected to different
underwriting criteria); both the current condition and recent history of the
overall local real estate market (in order to determine the accuracy of
utilizing recent historical charge-off data to derive the expected loan loss
percentages); the level of, and trend in, non-performing loans; the level and
composition of new loan activity; and the existence of geographic loan
concentrations (as the overwhelming majority of the Bank's loans are secured by
real estate properties located in the New York City metropolitan area) or
specific industry conditions within the portfolio segments. Since these criteria
affect the expected loan loss percentages that are applied to performing loans,
changes in any one of them will effect the amount of the allowance and the
provision for loan losses. The Bank applied the process of determining the
allowance for loan losses consistently throughout the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003.
Loans
classified as Special Mention, Substandard or Doubtful are reviewed individually
on a quarterly basis by the Loan Loss Reserve Committee to determine if specific
reserves are appropriate. Under the guidance established by Amended SFAS 114,
loans determined to be impaired (generally, non-performing and troubled-debt
restructured multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans and
non-performing one- to four-family loans in excess of $333,700) are evaluated in
order to establish whether the estimated value of the underlying collateral
determined based upon an independent appraisal is sufficient to satisfy the
existing debt. For each loan that the Bank determines to be impaired, impairment
is measured by the amount that the carrying balance of the loan, including all
accrued interest, exceeds the estimate of its fair value. A specific reserve is
established on all impaired loans to the extent of impairment and comprises a
portion of the allowance for loan losses. The Loan Loss Reserve Committee's
determination of the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral is
subject to assumptions and judgments made by the committee. A specific valuation
allowance could differ materially as a result of changes in these assumptions
and judgments.
The
recorded investment in loans deemed impaired was approximately $830,000,
consisting of two loans, at December 31, 2004. There were no loans considered
impaired by the Bank under Amended SFAS 114 as of December 31, 2003. The largest
single impaired loan at December 31, 2004, which possessed an outstanding
principal balance of $446,000, was removed from impaired status in January 2005.
The average total balance of impaired loans was approximately $608,000 during
the year ended December 31, 2004, $314,000 during the year ended December 31,
2003, $684,000 during the six months ended December 31, 2002, and $3.2 million
during the year ended June 30, 2002. The increase in the average balance of
impaired loans during the year ended December 31, 2004 resulted primarily from
the addition of the two impaired loans totaling $830,000 during the period. The
decrease in both the current and average balance of impaired loans during the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 resulted from the repayment in June 2002
of an impaired $2.9 million troubled-debt restructured loan. At December 31,
2004, reserves totaling $83,000 were allocated within the allowance for loan
losses for impaired loans. At December 31, 2003, there was no reserve allocated
within the allowance for loan losses for impaired loans.
If
approved by the Board of Directors, the Bank will additionally increase its
valuation allowance in an amount recommended by the Loan Loss Reserve Committee
to appropriately reflect the anticipated loss from any other loss classification
category. Typically, the Bank's policy is to charge-off immediately all balances
classified ''Loss'' and all charge-offs are recorded as a reduction of the
allowance for loan losses. The Bank applied this process consistently throughout
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Although
management believes that the Bank maintains its allowance for loan losses at
appropriate levels, adjustments may be necessary if economic, market or other
conditions in the future differ from the current operating environment. Although
the Bank believes it utilizes the most reliable information available, the level
of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate subject to significant
judgment. These evaluations are inherently subjective because, even though they
are based upon objective data, it is management's interpretation of that data
that determines the amount of the appropriate allowance. Therefore, the Company
periodically reviews the actual performance and charge-off of its portfolio and
compares them to the previously determined allowance coverage percentages. In
doing so, the Company evaluates the impact that the previously mentioned
variables may have on the portfolio to determine whether or not changes should
be made to the assumptions and analyses.
In
addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination
process, periodically review the Bank's allowance for loan losses and the level
of loans both in, and pending, foreclosure. Based on their judgments about
information available to them at the time of their examination, the regulators
may require the Bank to recognize adjustments to the allowance.
Valuation
of MSR. The
estimated origination and servicing costs of mortgage loans sold in which
servicing rights are retained is allocated between the loans and the servicing
rights based on their estimated fair values at the time of the loan sale.
Servicing assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value and are
amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, net servicing income. The
estimated fair value of loan servicing assets is determined by calculating the
present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, using assumptions of
prepayments, defaults, servicing costs and discount rates that the Company
believes market participants would use for similar assets. Capitalized loan
servicing assets are stratified based on predominant risk characteristics of the
underlying loans for the purpose of evaluating impairment. A valuation allowance
is then established in the event the recorded value of an individual stratum
exceeds fair value. All estimates and assumptions utilized in the valuation of
the MSR are derived based upon actual historical results for either the Bank or
its industry peers.
The fair
value of MSR is sensitive to changes in assumptions. Fluctuations in prepayment
speed assumptions have the most significant impact on the fair value of MSR. In
the event that loan prepayment activities increase due to increased loan
refinancing, the fair value of MSR would likely decline. In the event that loan
prepayment activities decrease due to a decline in loan refinancing, the fair
value of MSR would likely increase. Any measurement of MSR is limited by the
existing conditions and assumptions utilized at a particular point in time, and
would not necessarily be appropriate if applied at a different point in time.
Asset
Impairment Adjustments. Certain
of the Company’s assets are carried in its consolidated statements of financial
condition at fair value or at the lower of cost or fair value. Management
periodically performs analyses to test for impairment of these assets. Valuation
allowances are established when necessary to recognize impairment of such
assets. In addition to the impairment analyses related to loans and MSR
discussed above, two other significant impairment analyses relate to the value
of goodwill and other than temporary declines in the value of the Company's
securities.
Goodwill
is accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets," which was adopted on July 1, 2001. SFAS No. 142 eliminated amortization
of goodwill and instead requires performance of an annual impairment test at the
reporting unit level. As of both July 1, 2001 and December 31, 2004, the Company
had goodwill totaling $55.6 million. Prior to adoption of SFAS No. 142, annual
goodwill amortization expense totaled $4.6 million.
The
Company identified a single reporting unit for purposes of its goodwill
impairment testing. The impairment test is therefore performed on a consolidated
basis and compares the Company's market capitalization (reporting unit fair
value) to its outstanding equity (reporting unit carrying value). In accordance
with the recommended provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company utilizes its
closing stock price as reported on the Nasdaq National Market on the date of the
impairment test in order to compute market capitalization. The Company has
designated the last day of its fiscal year as the annual date for impairment
testing. The Company performed its annual impairment test as of December 31,
2004 and concluded that no potential impairment of goodwill existed since the
fair value of the Company's reporting unit exceeded its carrying value. No
events have occurred, nor circumstances changed, subsequent to December 31, 2004
that would reduce the fair value of the Company's reporting unit below its
carrying value. Such events or changes in circumstances would require an
immediate impairment test to be performed in accordance with SFAS No. 142.
Differences in the identification of reporting units and the use of valuation
techniques can result in materially different evaluations of impairment.
Debt and
equity securities that have readily determinable fair values are carried at fair
value unless they are held to maturity. Estimated fair values for securities are
based on published or securities dealers' market values. Debt securities are
classified as held to maturity and carried at amortized cost only if the Company
has a positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. If not classified as
held to maturity, such securities are classified as securities available for
sale or as trading securities. Unrealized holding gains or losses on securities
available for sale are excluded from net income and reported net of income taxes
as other comprehensive income or loss. The Company conducts a periodic review
and evaluation of its securities portfolio taking into account the severity,
duration and intent with regard to the securities in order to determine if the
decline in market value of any security below its amortized cost basis
is other than temporary. If such decline is deemed other than temporary, the
carrying amount of the security is adjusted through a valuation allowance. For
the periods ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were no other-than temporary
impairments in the securities portfolio.
Loan
Income Recognition.
Interest income on loans is recorded using the level yield method. Loan
origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and
amortized as a yield adjustment over the contractual loan terms. Accrual of
interest is discontinued when its receipt is in doubt, which typically occurs
when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest. Any interest
accrued to income in the year when interest accruals are discontinued is
reversed. Payments on nonaccrual loans are generally applied to principal.
Management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when a loan is in the
process of collection and the estimated fair value of the collateral is
sufficient to satisfy the principal balance and accrued interest. Loans are
returned to accrual status once the doubt concerning collectibility has been
removed and the borrower has demonstrated performance in accordance with the
loan terms and conditions.
The
Bank's primary sources of funding for its lending and investment activities
include deposits, repayments of loans and MBS, investment security maturities
and redemptions, Advances from the FHLBNY, and borrowing in the form of REPOS
entered into with various financial institutions, including the FHLBNY. The Bank
also sells selected multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans to
FNMA, and long-term, one- to four-family residential real estate loans to either
FNMA or SONYMA.
The Bank
gathers deposits in direct competition with other savings banks, commercial
banks and brokerage firms, many among the largest in the nation. In addition, it
must also compete for deposit monies against the stock markets and mutual funds,
especially during periods of strong performance in the equity markets. The
Bank's deposit flows are affected primarily by the pricing and marketing of its
deposit products compared to its competitors, as well as the market performance
of depositor investment alternatives such as the U.S. bond or equity markets. To
the extent that the Bank is responsive to general increases or declines in
interest rates, its deposit flows should not be materially impacted. A favorable
performance by the equity markets, however, could adversely impact the Company’s
deposit flows.
Deposits
increased $168.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2004 and $114.5
million during the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in deposits during
each of these periods reflected marketing efforts that helped generate
additional deposit balances in CDs and core deposit accounts. Successful CD
promotional campaigns implemented during the year ended December 31, 2004
resulted in CD growth totaling $159.6 million. Money market accounts realized
the greatest growth during the year ended December 31, 2003, increasing $128.6
million.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, principal re-payments received on real estate
loans totaled $540.8 million and on MBS totaled $206.5 million. During the year
ended December 31, 2003, principal payments received on real estate loans
totaled $972.6 million and on MBS totaled $364.2 million. The decreases during
2004 resulted from a reduction in customer refinance activities associated with
mortgage-backed assets. The majority of this decline resulted from the
significant number of loans that were satisfied or refinanced during 2003 as a
result of historically low interest rates, which substantially reduced the level
of loans likely to prepay or refinance during 2004.
Maturities
and calls of investment securities totaled $5.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2004 and $67.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2003,
providing additional liquidity to the Company during these periods. During the
period January 2002 through December 2003, the Company experienced calls on a
large portion of its investment securities as a result of the low level of
interest rates that prevailed during that period. The balance of callable
securities during 2004 was greatly diminished due to the extensive call activity
during 2003.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company received proceeds of $127.1
million from the sale of MBS and $8.0 million from the sale of available for
sale investment securities. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company
received proceeds of $55.9 million from the sale of MBS. These sales were
conducted for various business purposes, including, but not limited to, added
liquidity and asset/liability management.
The Bank
implemented a program in December 2002 to originate and sell multifamily
residential mortgage loans in the secondary market to FNMA while retaining
servicing. The Bank underwrites these loans using its customary underwriting
standards, funds the loans, and sells them to FNMA at agreed upon pricing.
Typically, the Bank seeks to sell loans to FNMA with terms to maturity or
repricing in excess of seven years from the origination date, since the Bank
does not desire to hold such loans in its portfolio due to the heightened
interest rate risk that they present. Under the terms of the sales program, the
Bank retains a portion of the associated credit risk. Once established, such
amount continues to increase as long as the Bank continues to sell loans to FNMA
under the program. The Bank retains this level of exposure until the portfolio
of loans sold to FNMA is paid in their entirety or the Bank funds claims by FNMA
for the maximum loss exposure. During the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively, the Bank sold $164.9 million and $87.1 million of loans to
FNMA.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, REPOS increased $192.9 million compared to a
net decline of $82.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2003. During the
year ended December 31, 2004, management elected to utilize REPOS as the primary
source of funding for growth in MBS. During the year ended December 31, 2004,
the Company added REPOS with an average maturity of 1.9 years and a weighted
average interest cost of 2.29% in order to fund securities purchases and/or loan
originations.
During the
year ended December 31, 2004, FHLBNY Advances declined $27.5 million, as
management utilized REPOS and deposits as the primary sources for funding asset
growth. During the year ended December 31, 2003, FHLBNY Advances decreased $21.0
million, as management elected to prepay and not replace $30.0 million of FHLBNY
Advances. The average term to maturity on FHLBNY Advances that were not replaced
during the year ended December 31, 2004 was 1.9 years.
In March
2004, the Company received net proceeds of $72.2 million from the issuance of
debt in the form of Trust Preferred securities. These borrowings bear interest
at a rate of 7.0% for 30 years and are callable at any time after 5 years.
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company utilized a portion of the
funds received from this issuance to repurchase its common stock, and invested
the remaining balance in medium-term securities.
The
Bank's primary uses of liquidity and capital resources are the origination of
real estate loans and the purchase of mortgage-backed and other
securities. During
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, real estate loan originations
totaled $1.01 billion and $1.10 billion, respectively. A continued environment
of low long-term interest rates during the period January 2003 through December
2004 contributed to the strong level of real estate loan originations during the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Purchases of investment securities and
MBS, which were $531.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, totaled
$398.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. The
heightened purchase activity during the year ended December 31, 2003 reflected
both the replenishment of the MBS portfolio in response to high levels of
amortization during the period and the acquisition of a greater volume of
short-term securities earmarked for re-investment in real estate loans.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Holding Company repurchased 1,987,529
shares of its common stock into treasury. All shares were recorded at the
acquisition cost, which totaled $38.2 million during the year. As of December
31, 2004, up to 1,417,556 shares remained available for purchase under
authorized share purchase programs. Based upon the closing price of its common
stock of $17.91 per share as of December 31, 2004, the Holding Company would
utilize $25.4 million in order to purchase all of the remaining authorized
shares.
The
levels of the Bank's short-term liquid assets are dependent on its operating,
financing and investing activities during any given period. The Bank monitors
its liquidity position on a daily basis. In the event that the Bank should
require funds beyond its ability to generate them internally, an additional
source of funds is available through use of its borrowing line at the FHLBNY. At
December 31, 2004, the Bank had an additional potential borrowing capacity of
$507.0 million available should it purchase the minimum required level of FHLBNY
common stock (i.e.,
1/20th of any
new FHLBNY borrowings).
The Bank
is subject to minimum regulatory capital requirements imposed by the OTS, which,
as a general matter, are based on the amount and composition of an institution's
assets. At December 31, 2004, the Bank was in compliance with all applicable
regulatory capital requirements, and was considered "well-capitalized" for all
regulatory purposes.
The
Company's ratio of stockholders' equity to total assets was 8.34% and 9.55%,
respectively, ay December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Contractual
Obligations
The Bank
has outstanding at any time, a significant number of borrowings in the form of
FHLBNY Advances or REPOS. The Holding Company also has an outstanding $25.0
million non-callable subordinated note payable due to mature in 2010, and $72.2
million of trust preferred borrowings from third parties due to mature in April
2034, which is callable at any time after April 2009.
The Bank
is obligated under leases for certain rental payments due on its branches and
equipment. A summary of borrowings and lease obligations at December 31, 2004 is
as follows:
Contractual
Obligations |
Less
than One Year |
One
Year to Three Years |
Over
Three Years to Five Years |
Over
Five Years |
|
Total
at
December
31, 2004 |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
CD's |
734,844 |
$190,354 |
$34,741 |
$12 |
|
$959,951 |
Borrowings
(including
subordinated
note payable) |
$245,000 |
$230,000 |
$90,584 |
$243,665 |
|
$809,249 |
Operating
lease obligations |
$1,004 |
$2,023 |
$1,653 |
$3,269 |
|
$7,949 |
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As part
of its business of originating loans, the Bank has outstanding commitments to
extend credit to third parties, which are subject to strict credit control
assessments. Since many of these loan commitments expire without being funded in
whole or part, the contract amounts are not estimates of future cash flows.
|
Less
than One Year |
One
Year to Three Years |
Over
Three Years
to
Five Years |
Over
Five Years |
|
Total
at
December
31,
2004 |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Credit
Commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
lines of credit |
$50,868 |
$- |
$- |
$- |
|
$50,868 |
Other
loan commitments |
57,407 |
- |
- |
- |
|
57,407 |
Total
Credit Commitments |
$108,275 |
$- |
$- |
$- |
|
$108,275 |
Analysis
of Net Interest Income
The
Company's profitability, like that of most financial institutions, is dependent
to a significant extent upon net interest income, which is the difference
between interest income on interest-earnings assets, such as loans and
securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as
deposits or borrowings. Net interest income depends on the relative amounts of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the interest rate
earned or paid on them. The following tables set forth certain information
relating to the Company's consolidated statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the unaudited year ended December 31, 2002,
the six months ended December 31, 2002 and the unaudited six months ended
December 31, 2001, and reflect the average yield on interest-earning assets and
average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the periods indicated. Such
yields and costs are derived by dividing interest income or expense by the
average balance of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities,
respectively, for the periods indicated. Average balances are derived from daily
balances. The yields and costs include fees that are considered adjustments to
yields. All significant changes in average balances and income or expense are
discussed in the comparison of operating results commencing on page 48.
|
For
the Year Ended December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Yield/ |
|
Balance |
Interest |
Cost |
|
Balance |
Interest |
Cost |
|
(Dollars
In
Thousands) |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans (1) |
$2,393,862
|
$138,720
|
5.79% |
|
$2,189,747
|
$145,704
|
6.65% |
Other
loans |
3,325
|
235
|
7.07 |
|
3,609
|
273
|
7.56 |
Investment
securities (2) |
47,384
|
1,745
|
3.68 |
|
61,352
|
2,361
|
3.85 |
Mortgage-backed
securities |
618,471
|
21,091
|
3.41 |
|
511,848
|
17,984
|
3.51 |
Other |
129,570
|
1,830
|
1.41 |
|
148,908
|
2,793
|
1.88 |
Total
interest-earning assets |
3,192,612
|
$163,621
|
5.12% |
|
2,915,464
|
$169,115
|
5.80% |
Non-interest
earning assets |
159,580
|
|
|
|
148,747
|
|
|
Total
assets |
$3,352,192
|
|
|
|
$3,064,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW,
Super Now accounts |
$41,535
|
$410
|
0.99% |
|
$33,055
|
$344
|
1.04% |
Money
Market accounts |
806,582 |
11,745 |
1.46 |
|
682,277 |
10,740 |
1.57 |
Savings
accounts |
367,746
|
1,938 |
0.53 |
|
368,451
|
2,405 |
0.65 |
Certificates
of deposit |
939,682
|
23,780 |
2.53 |
|
872,568
|
24,732 |
2.83 |
Borrowed
Funds |
726,083
|
29,903 |
4.12 |
|
656,187
|
32,842 |
5.00 |
Total
interest-bearing liabilities |
2,881,628
|
$67,776
|
2.35% |
|
2,612,538
|
$71,063
|
2.72% |
Checking
accounts |
93,845
|
|
|
|
89,389
|
|
|
Other
non-interest-bearing liabilities |
100,926 |
|
|
|
89,029 |
|
|
Total
liabilities |
3,076,399
|
|
|
|
2,790,956
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity |
275,793
|
|
|
|
273,255
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$3,3,52,192
|
|
|
|
$3,064,211
|
|
|
Net
interest spread (3) |
|
|
2.77% |
|
|
|
3.08% |
Net
interest income/ interest margin (4) |
|
$95,845
|
3.00% |
|
|
$98,052
|
3.36% |
Net
interest-earning assets |
$310,984
|
|
|
|
$302,926
|
|
|
Ratio
of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
110.79% |
|
|
|
111.60% |
(1) In
computing the average balance of loans, non-performing loans have been included.
Interest income includes loan servicing fees as defined under SFAS No. 91,
Accounting
for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans
and Initial Direct Costs of Leases—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 13, 60,
and 65 and a rescission of FASB Statement No. 17 ("SFAS
91").
(2) Includes
interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
(3) Net
interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
(4) The
interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average
interest-earning assets.
|
For
the Year Ended December 31, |
|
2003 |
|
2002
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Yield/ |
|
Balance |
Interest |
Cost |
|
Balance |
Interest |
Cost |
|
(Dollars
In
Thousands) |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans (1) |
$2,189,747
|
$145,704
|
6.65% |
|
$2,124,952
|
$156,422
|
7.36% |
Other
loans |
3,609
|
273
|
7.56 |
|
3,345
|
273
|
8.16 |
Investment
securities (2) |
61,352
|
2,361
|
3.85 |
|
118,316
|
4,909
|
4.15 |
Mortgage-backed
securities |
511,848
|
17,984
|
3.51 |
|
332,932
|
16,795
|
5.04 |
Other |
148,908
|
2,793
|
1.88 |
|
128,820
|
3,515
|
2.73 |
Total
interest-earning assets |
2,915,464
|
$169,115
|
5.80% |
|
2,708,365
|
$181,914
|
6.72% |
Non-interest
earning assets |
148,747
|
|
|
|
139,042
|
|
|
Total
assets |
$3,064,211
|
|
|
|
$2,847,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW,
Super Now accounts |
$33,055
|
$344
|
1.04% |
|
$29,767
|
$356
|
1.20% |
Money
Market accounts |
682,277 |
10,740 |
1.57 |
|
535,820 |
11,841 |
2.21 |
Savings
accounts |
368,451
|
2,405 |
0.65 |
|
364,390
|
4,260 |
1.17 |
Certificates
of deposit |
872,568
|
24,732 |
2.83 |
|
759,976
|
27,678 |
3.64 |
Borrowed
Funds |
656,187
|
32,842 |
5.00 |
|
735,972
|
47,655 |
6.48 |
Total
interest-bearing liabilities |
2,612,538
|
$71,063
|
2.72% |
|
2,425,925
|
$91,790
|
3.78% |
Checking
accounts |
89,389
|
|
|
|
79,392
|
|
|
Other
non-interest-bearing liabilities |
89,029 |
|
|
|
89,293 |
|
|
Total
liabilities |
2,790,956
|
|
|
|
2,594,610
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity |
273,255
|
|
|
|
252,797
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$3,064,211
|
|
|
|
$2,847,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest spread (3) |
|
|
3.08% |
|
|
|
2.93% |
Net
interest income/ interest margin (4) |
|
$98,052
|
3.36% |
|
|
$90,124
|
3.33% |
Net
interest-earning assets |
$302,926
|
|
|
|
$282,440
|
|
|
Ratio
of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
111.60% |
|
|
|
111.64% |
(1) In
computing the average balance of loans, non-performing loans have been included.
Interest income includes loan servicing fees as defined under SFAS No.
91.
(2) Includes
interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
(3) Net
interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
(4) The
interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average
interest-earning assets.
|
For
the Six Months Ended December 31, |
|
2002 |
|
2001
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Yield/ |
|
Balance |
Interest |
Cost |
|
Balance |
Interest |
Cost |
|
(Dollars
In
Thousands) |
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Loans (1) |
$2,166,062
|
$78,275
|
7.23% |
|
$1,995,364
|
$75,823
|
7.60% |
Other
loans |
3,380
|
141
|
8.34 |
|
3,330
|
179
|
10.75 |
Investment
securities (2) |
124,456
|
2,455
|
3.95 |
|
103,405
|
2,773
|
5.36 |
Mortgage-backed
securities |
344,656
|
7,895
|
4.58 |
|
407,056
|
12,149
|
5.97 |
Other |
126,160
|
1,703
|
2.70 |
|
108,612
|
2,212
|
4.07 |
Total
interest-earning assets |
2,764,714
|
$90,469
|
6.54% |
|
2,617,767
|
$93,136
|
7.12% |
Non-interest
earning assets |
138,461
|
|
|
|
130,866
|
|
|
Total
assets |
$2,903,175
|
|
|
|
$2,748,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW,
Super Now accounts |
$31,085
|
$189
|
1.21% |
|
$26,606
|
$157
|
1.17% |
Money
Market accounts |
584,743 |
6,016 |
2.04 |
|
369,822 |
6,637 |
3.56 |
Savings
accounts |
366,260
|
1,843 |
1.00 |
|
349,993
|
3,236 |
1.83 |
Certificates
of deposit |
794,116
|
13,583 |
3.39 |
|
698,136
|
16,474 |
4.68 |
Borrowed
Funds |
694,973
|
21,647 |
6.18 |
|
922,705
|
27,228 |
5.85 |
Total
interest-bearing liabilities |
2,471,177
|
$43,278
|
3.47% |
|
2,367,262
|
$53,732
|
4.50% |
Checking
accounts |
82,783
|
|
|
|
69,333
|
|
|
Other
non-interest-bearing liabilities |
90,979 |
|
|
|
78,014 |
|
|
Total
liabilities |
2,644,939
|
|
|
|
2,514,609
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity |
258,236
|
|
|
|
234,024
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$2,903,175
|
|
|
|
$2,748,633
|
|
|
Net
interest spread (3) |
|
|
3.07% |
|
|
|
2.61% |
Net
interest income/ interest margin (4) |
|
$47,191
|
3.41% |
|
|
$39,404
|
3.01% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest-earning assets |
$293,537
|
|
|
|
$250,505
|
|
|
Ratio
of interest-earning assets
to interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
111.88% |
|
|
|
110.58% |
(1) In
computing the average balance of loans, non-performing loans have been included.
Interest income includes loan servicing fees as defined under SFAS No.
91.
(2) Includes
interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
(3) Net
interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
(4) The
interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average
interest-earning assets.
Rate/Volume
Analysis. The
following table represents the extent to which variations in interest rates and
the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have
affected interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated.
Information is provided in each category with respect to: (i) variances
attributable to fluctuations in volume (change in volume multiplied by prior
rate), (ii) variances attributable to rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior
volume), and (iii) the net change. Variances attributable to the combined impact
of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to the
volume and the changes due to rate.
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2004
Compared
to
Year
Ended December 31, 2003
Increase/
(Decrease) Due to |
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2003
Compared
to
Year
Ended December 31, 2002
Increase/
(Decrease) Due to |
|
Volume
|
Rate |
Total |
|
Volume
|
Rate |
Total |
|
(Dollars
In Thousands) |
Interest-earning
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Loans |
$12,715 |
$(19,699) |
$(6,984) |
|
$4,570 |
$(15,288) |
$(10,718) |
Other
loans |
(20)
|
(18) |
(38) |
|
21
|
(21) |
- |
Investment
securities |
(525) |
(91) |
(616) |
|
(2,278) |
(270) |
(2,548) |
Mortgage-backed
securities |
3,683 |
(576) |
3,107 |
|
7,655 |
(6,466) |
1,189 |
Other |
(313) |
(650) |
(963) |
|
461 |
(1,183) |
(722) |
Total
|
$15,540 |
$(21,034) |
$(5,494) |
|
$10,429 |
$(23,228) |
$(12,799) |
Interest-bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW
and Super Now accounts |
$86 |
$(20) |
$66 |
|
$38 |
$(50) |
$(12) |
Money
market accounts |
1,857 |
(852) |
1,005
|
|
2,783 |
(3,884) |
(1,101) |
Savings
accounts |
(15) |
(452) |
(467) |
|
44 |
(1,899) |
(1,855) |
Certificates
of deposit |
1,784 |
(2,736) |
(952) |
|
3,656 |
(6,602) |
(2,946) |
Borrowed
funds |
3,167 |
(6,106) |
(2,939) |
|
(4,544) |
(10,269) |
(14,813) |
Total
|
6,879 |
(10,166) |
(3,287) |
|
1,977 |
(22,704) |
(20,727) |
Net
change in net interest income |
$8,661 |
$(10,868) |
$(2,207) |
|
$8,452 |
$(524) |
$7,928 |
|
Six
Months Ended |
|
December
31, 2002 |
|
Compared
to |
|
Six
Months Ended |
|
December
31, 2001 |
|
Increase/
(Decrease) |
|
Due
to |
|
Volume
|
Rate |
Total |
|
|
Interest-earning
assets: |
|
|
|
Real
Estate Loans |
$6,315 |
$(3,863) |
$2,452 |
Other
loans |
3
|
(41) |
(38) |
Investment
securities |
487 |
(805) |
(318) |
Mortgage-backed
securities |
(1,644) |
(2,610) |
(4,254) |
Other |
296 |
(805) |
(509) |
Total
|
$5,457 |
$(8,124) |
$(2,667) |
Interest-bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
NOW
and Super Now accounts |
$26 |
$6 |
$32 |
Money
market accounts |
3,035 |
(3,656) |
(621) |
Savings
accounts |
111 |
(1,504) |
(1,393) |
Certificates
of deposit |
1,957 |
(4,848) |
(2,891) |
Borrowed
funds |
(6,918) |
1,337 |
(5,581) |
Total
|
(1,789) |
(8,665) |
(10,454) |
Net
change in net interest income |
$7,246 |
$541 |
$7,787 |
Comparison
of Financial Condition at December 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003
Assets. Assets
totaled $3.38 billion at December 31, 2004, an increase of $405.6 million from
total assets of $2.97 billion at December 31, 2003. The growth in assets
occurred primarily in MBS available for sale and real estate loans, which
increased $57.5 million and $306.9 million, respectively. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, the Bank purchased $398.2 million of MBS available for sale.
These purchases were intended to provide additional yield over other short-term
investments, while offering liquidity to the Bank in future quarters when it may
desire to deploy funds into higher yielding investments. Partially offsetting
these purchases were principal payments received of $206.2 million and net sales
proceeds of $127.1 million on MBS available for sale during the year ended
December 31, 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Bank experienced
a reduction in the historically high levels of principal repayments on MBS
available for sale that occurred during 2003. This decline reflected a reduction
in mortgage refinancing activity during the period as a result of the
historically high levels of prepayments during 2003 that significantly reduced
the total population of mortgage-backed assets likely to refinance in future
years.
Real
estate loans (including loans held for sale) increased $306.9 million during the
year ended December 31, 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2004, real
estate loan originations totaled $1.01 billion, of which $962.5 million were
multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans. Real estate loan
origination levels were driven by the continuation of the low interest rate
environment during the period January through December 2004. Offsetting the
growth in real estate loans from originations were principal repayments totaling
$540.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2004. Principal repayments,
which include both regular amortization and prepayments, totaled $972.6 million
during the year ended December 31, 2003. The decline reflected a reduction in
overall loan refinancing activity during the period as the record level of loan
refinancing during 2003 significantly reduced the total population of loans
likely to refinance in future years.
Investment
securities available for sale increased $17.7 million during the year ended
December 31, 2004, due primarily to purchases of $30.1 million during the period
that were partially offset by maturities and sales totaling $13.0 million.
Liabilities. Total
liabilities increased $407.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2004.
Deposits grew $168.4 million due to the success of various sales and marketing
activities during the period, with virtually all of this growth experienced in
CDs. In addition, escrow and other deposits increased $8.3 million during the
period due to increased funding for real estate taxes.
In March
2004, the Company completed an offering of trust preferred securities in an
aggregate amount of $72.2 million. The trust preferred securities, which bear a
fixed interest rate of 7.0%, mature on April 14, 2034, and are callable without
penalty at any time on or after April 15, 2009. These borrowings were undertaken
in order to obtain funding for general business activities including, but not
limited to, repurchases of common stock and payment of cash
dividends.
Stockholders'
Equity.
Stockholders' equity decreased $2.2 million during the year ended December 31,
2004, due to the repurchase of $38.2 million of treasury stock, a net decrease
in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss of $2.4 million, and the
payment of cash dividends of $19.8 million during the period. These reductions
in stockholders' equity were partially offset by net income of $46.2 million, an
increase to stockholders' equity of $9.4 million related to the issuance of
common stock for the exercise of stock options and tax benefits associated with
both the 1996 and 2001 Stock Option Plans for Outside Directors, Officers and
Employees of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. ("Stock Option Plans") and the RRP,
and an increase to equity of $2.6 million related to amortization of the
Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. and Certain
Affiliates ("ESOP") and RRP stock benefit plans. Both the ESOP and RRP have
investments in the Holding Company's common stock that are recorded as
reductions in stockholders' equity ("Contra Equity Balances"). As compensation
expense is recognized on the ESOP and RRP, the Contra Equity Balances are
reduced, resulting in an increase to their respective equity balances. This
increase to equity offsets the decline in the Company's retained earnings
related to the periodic ESOP and RRP expenses that are recorded. The
stockholders' equity component of other comprehensive income decreased $2.4
million during the year ended December 31, 2004 as a result of a decline in the
net unrealized gain on investment and mortgage-backed securities available for
sale that was attributable to increases in short-term interest rates during
2004.
Comparison
of Financial Condition at December 31, 2003 and December 31,
2002
Assets. Assets
totaled $2.97 billion at December 31, 2003, an increase of $25.3 million from
total assets of $2.95 billion at December 31, 2002. The growth in assets was
experienced primarily in MBS available for sale and real estate loans, which
increased $101.3 million and $25.8 million, respectively. During the year ended
December 31, 2003, the Bank purchased $531.0 million of MBS available for sale.
These purchases were intended to provide both additional yield over other
short-term investments as well as liquidity to the Bank in future quarters when
it may desire to deploy funds into higher yielding investments. Partially
offsetting these purchases were MBS principal repayments of $364.2 million and
sales of $57.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2003. During the year
ended December 31, 2003, the Bank experienced above average levels of principal
repayments on MBS available for sale. These repayments were driven by above
average mortgage refinancing activity during the period, which resulted from the
continued low level of interest rates during the period January through December
2003.
In
addition to growth in MBS available for sale, real estate loans increased $25.8
million during the year ended December 31, 2003. The majority of this growth was
achieved in mixed use properties that are classified as commercial real estate
loans. During the period, total real estate loan originations totaled $1.10
billion, of which $1.05 billion were multifamily residential and commercial real
estate loans. The majority of the Bank's multifamily originations were retained
in its portfolio. Real estate loan origination levels were driven by the
continuation of the low interest rate environment during the period January
through December 2003. Offsetting the growth in real estate loan originations
were increases in principal prepayment levels during the year ended December 31,
2003 attributable to the low level of long-term interest rates during 2003.
Principal repayments, which include both regular amortization and prepayments,
totaled $972.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to
$520.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2002.
Investment
securities available for sale declined $67.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 2003, due to maturities and calls of these securities during the
period resulting from the continued low interest rate environment. Purchases of
investment securities available for sale were immaterial during the year ended
December 31, 2003.
Liabilities. Total
liabilities increased $7.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2003.
Deposits grew $114.5 million due to the success of various sales and marketing
activities during the period, primarily for money market accounts. During the
year ended December 31, 2003, successful promotional campaigns resulted in
growth in money markets of $128.6 million, which was partially offset by a
decline of $29.8 million in CDs, as higher-rate promotional CDs that were
maturing were not renewed during the year.
Stockholders'
Equity.
Stockholders' equity increased $18.2 million during the year ended December 31,
2003, due to the addition of net income of $51.3 million, the increase to equity
of $11.7 million related to the issuance of stock for the exercise of stock
options and tax benefits associated with the Stock Option Plans and the RRP, and
the increase to equity of $2.6 million related to the amortization of the ESOP
and RRP. Both the ESOP and RRP have Contra Equity Balances. As compensation
expense is recognized on the ESOP and RRP, the Contra Equity Balances are
reduced, resulting in an increase to their respective equity balances. This
increase to equity offsets the decline in the Company's retained earnings
related to the periodic ESOP and RRP expenses that are recorded.
All of
the aforementioned increases to equity during the year ended December 31, 2003
were substantially offset by treasury stock purchases of $26.8 million, cash
dividends of $15.8 million paid to shareholders and purchases of stock by the
Benefit Maintenance Plan of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. ("BMP") and RRP of
$1.8 million during the same period, and a decline in the unrealized gain or
loss on available for sale securities component of other comprehensive income of
$2.9 million reflecting the general low level of interest rates.
Comparison
of the Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2004 and
2003
General. Net
income was $46.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, a decrease of
$5.1 million from net income of $51.3 million during the year ended December 31,
2003. During this comparative period, net interest income decreased $2.2
million, non-interest income decreased $4.6 million and non-interest expense
increased $1.6 million, resulting in a decline in pre-tax income of $8.4
million. Income tax expense decreased $3.4 million as a result of the reduced
pre-tax income.
Net
Interest Income. Net
interest income for the year ended December 31, 2004 decreased $2.2 million to
$95.8 million from $98.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2003. This
decrease was attributable to a decline of $5.5 million in interest income that
was partially offset by a decline of $3.3 million in interest expense during the
year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. The
net interest spread decreased 31 basis points from 3.08% for the year ended
December 31, 2003 to 2.77% for the year ended December 31, 2004, and the net
interest margin decreased 36 basis points from 3.36% to 3.00% during the same
period.
The
decrease in both the net interest spread and net interest margin reflected a 68
basis point decline in the average yield on interest earning assets as a result
of the continued repricing of assets during the historically low interest rate
environment that has persisted over the past three years. In addition, prior to
January 2004, the overall low interest rate environment resulted in a greater
decline in the average cost of interest bearing liabilities than the decline in
average yield on interest earning assets. During the year ended December 31,
2004, the continued low interest rate environment created the opposite effect,
resulting in a greater decline in the average yield on interest earning assets
than in the average cost of interest bearing liabilities. (See section entitled
"Interest Income" below for a further discussion
of these declines). As a result, both the net interest spread and the net
interest margin, which had increased during most of 2003 and 2002, declined
during the year ended December 31, 2004.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003,
the average yield on real estate loans and MBS, which collectively comprised the
great majority of the Company's interest earning assets, declined by 86 basis
points and 10 basis points, respectively (See the discussion entitled "Interest Income" below for a further examination of
these declines).
Partially
offsetting the decline in the average yield on interest earning assets was a
reduction of 37 basis points in the average cost of interest bearing
liabilities. This resulted primarily from declines in the average cost of
borrowings of 88 basis points and a decline in the average cost of CDs of 30
basis points, coupled with the movement of the overall composition of funding
from higher-cost borrowings into deposits with a lower average cost (See the
discussion entitled "Interest Expense" below for
a further examination of these declines).
Interest Income.
Interest income was $163.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2004, a
decrease of $5.5 million from $169.1 million during the year ended December 31,
2003. Interest income on real estate loans, investment securities and other
short term investments declined by $7.0 million, $616,000 and $963,000,
respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003. Partially offsetting these declines was an increase of $3.1
million in interest income on MBS during the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.
The
decline in interest income resulted from the historically low interest rate
environment that existed during the period January 1, 2002 through December 31,
2004. That environment stimulated the refinancing and prepayment of higher rate
loans in the Bank's portfolio, while also resulting in reduced rates on existing
portfolio loans that repriced during the period January 1, 2003 to December 31,
2004 (although the levels of refinancing and prepayment did experience a slight
decline during the year ended December 31, 2004 as a result of an increase in
interest rates). The combination of these two factors resulted in a decline of
86 basis points in the average yield on real estate loans (the Bank's largest
interest-earning asset) during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the
year ended December 31, 2003. In addition, the average yield on MBS declined 10
basis points during the same period as a result of the high level of prepayments
on portfolio securities during 2003 and 2002 as well as the purchase of new
securities during the period January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004 while
rates were historically low. Finally, as a result of the low interest rate
environment, the average yields on investment securities and other short-term
investments also declined by 17 basis points and 47 basis points, respectively,
during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31,
2003.
The
Bank's general policy has been to emphasize growth in real estate loans as its
primary interest-earning asset, and de-emphasize its investment and MBS
portfolios, while loan origination demand is strong. However, as part of a
specific investment strategy to achieve a desirable balance of yield and
liquidity on short-term investments, the Bank purchased $398.2 million of MBS
during the year ended December 31, 2004. This purchase level exceeded the level
of MBS principal repayments of $206.5 million during the same period, and
contributed to an overall increase of $106.6 million in the average balance of
MBS during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December
31, 2003. As a result, the dollar amount of interest income on MBS increased by
$3.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2003, despite the decline in average yield of 10 basis points
during the same period.
Interest Expense. Interest
expense declined $3.3 million, to $67.8 million during the year ended December
31, 2004, from $71.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2003. The
decrease resulted primarily from a reduction of $2.9 million in interest expense
on borrowed funds, due to a decline of 88 basis points in the average cost of
borrowed funds during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2003.
During
the twelve months ended December 31, 2003, the Company reduced its total
borrowings by $103.9 million by either not replacing borrowings that matured or
prepaying outstanding debt. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company
incurred $4.1 million of expense on prepaid borrowings, which increased the
average cost of borrowed funds by 63 basis points during the period. During the
year ended December 31, 2004, the Company added $192.9 million of REPOS, and a
$72.2 million trust preferred borrowing. The REPOS
were
added during the period of historically low interest rates; and, therefore,
possessed a lower average cost than the existing average cost within the
Company's total portfolio of borrowings, which was not materially impacted by
the increases in short-term interest rates that occurred during the period June
through December 2004. The trust preferred borrowing added 26 basis points to
the average cost of borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2004. The
combination of activity in these two periods resulted in an overall increase of
$69.9 million in the average balance of borrowings during the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, but a decline of
88 basis points in their average cost.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003,
the average cost of CDs, the next largest component of interest expense during
the 2004 period, declined by 30 basis points, while their average balance
increased by $67.1 million. The combination of these two events resulted in a
reduction in interest expense of $952,000 during the year ended December 31,
2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003. The decline in interest rates
offered on CDs reflected the continued low level of interest rates paid during
the period January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2004, which was not materially
impacted by the recent increase in short-term interest rates that occurred
during the period June through December 2004. The increase in the average
balance of CDs during the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2003 resulted from new promotional CDs added during the year
ended December 31, 2004.
The
average cost of savings accounts declined by 12 basis points during the
comparative period, resulting in a $467,000 reduction in interest expense. The
decline in average cost reflected reductions in interest rates paid by the Bank
as a result of the overall interest rate environment in effect during 2004,
which was not materially impacted by the recent increase in short-term interest
rates that occurred during the period June through December 2004.
Interest
expense on money market accounts increased $1.0 million during the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, due to an
increase in average balance of $124.3 million during the period. The increase in
average balance reflected successful deposit gathering promotions during the
period July 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004. Partially offsetting the increase was
a decline in the average cost of money market accounts of 11 basis points,
reflecting reductions in interest rates paid by the Bank as a result of the
overall low interest rate environment in effect during 2004, which was not
materially impacted by the recent increase in short-term interest
rates.
Non-Interest
Income.
Non-interest income decreased $4.6 million, to $20.5 million, during the year
ended December 31, 2004, from $25.1 million during the year ended December 31,
2003. The decline resulted primarily from decreased prepayment fee income of
$5.6 million, due to a decrease in refinancing driven by the significant levels
of refinancing that occurred during 2003, as well as increases in interest rates
during the second half of 2004. The decline in prepayment fee income was
partially offset by an increase of $1.0 million in the net gain recorded on the
sale of loans, investment securities and MBS.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the net gain on the sale of loans was
$336,000. During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded a net
gain of $1.6 million on the sale of loans (primarily multifamily residential) to
FNMA. Increases in interest rates during 2004 reduced the level of gain recorded
on loans sold from the Bank's portfolio to FNMA. The gain on portfolio loan
sales to FNMA was significantly higher during 2003, when rates were at historic
lows. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company recorded a net gain
of $377,000 on the sale of investment and mortgage-backed securities. During the
year ended December 31, 2003, the Company recorded a net loss of $1.9 million on
the sale of investment and mortgage-backed securities. The sale of securities
and associated loss during the year ended December 31, 2003 were incurred in
connection with a balance sheet restructuring performed in October
2003.
Non-Interest
Expense.
Non-interest expense was $42.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2004,
an increase of $1.6 million over the year ended December 31, 2003.
Salaries
and benefits decreased $491,000, primarily as a result of a reduction of $1.6
million in benefits accrued under the BMP, which was partially offset by
increased salaries resulting from both general salary increases and added staff.
The
benefit costs associated with the ESOP and RRP increased $1.0 million during the
year ended December 31, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, due
primarily to the recording of expense related to dividends paid on unallocated
ESOP shares that commenced in 2004.
Data
processing costs increased $765,000 during the comparative period, and were
primarily due to non-recurring charges approximating $640,000 associated with a
data system conversion completed by the Company in November 2004, that affected
loan servicing, retail deposit branch operations and accounting transaction
processing.
Occupancy
and equipment expenses increased $159,000 due to increased maintenance and
utility costs and increased depreciation expense associated with recently
acquired furniture and fixtures.
Income
Tax Expense. Income
tax expense decreased $3.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to the year ended December 31, 2003, due primarily to a decline of $8.4
million in pre-tax net income. The effective tax rate approximated 37.5% during
both the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Comparison
of the Operating Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2003 and the Unaudited
Year Ended December 31, 2002
General. Net
income was $51.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, an increase of
$6.7 million over net income of $44.6 million during the year ended December 31,
2002. During this comparative period, net interest income increased $7.9
million, non-interest income increased $5.1 million and non-interest expense
increased $2.1 million, resulting in increased pre-tax income of $10.9 million.
Income tax expense increased $4.2 million as a result of the increased pre-tax
income.
Net
Interest Income. Net
interest income for the year ended December 31, 2003 increased $7.9 million, to
$98.0 million, from $90.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2002. The
increase was attributable to a decline of $20.7 million in interest expense that
was partially offset by a decline of $12.8 million in interest income during the
year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. The
net interest spread increased 15 basis points from 2.93% for the year ended
December 31, 2002 to 3.08% for the year ended December 31, 2003, and the net
interest margin increased 3 basis points from 3.33% to 3.36% during the same
period.
The
increase in both the net interest spread and net interest margin reflected a 106
basis point decline in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities as a
result of a shift in the composition of interest-bearing liabilities away from
higher cost borrowings towards lower cost CDs, money market and other deposit
accounts, and a decline of 148 basis points in the average cost of borrowed
funds (96 basis points excluding prepayment expenses of $4.1 million and $8.4
million, respectively, incurred during the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002). Borrowing costs declined during the year ended December 31, 2003 compared
to the year ended December 31, 2002 due to declines in short-term and
medium-term interest rates during 2002 and 2003. During the year ended December
31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, the average balance of
deposits, including non-interest-bearing checking accounts, increased as a
result of ongoing deposit marketing promotions and customer sales activities. In
addition, the average balance of real estate loans increased during the year
ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, and the
average rate on real estate loans was typically less susceptible to reductions
in interest rates than other interest-earning assets since real estate loans
possess a longer average term to their maturity or next interest rate reset.
Interest
Income. Interest
income was $169.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease of
$12.8 million from $181.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2002.
Interest income on real estate loans and investment securities declined $10.7
million and $2.5 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2003
compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. These declines were partially
offset by an increase in interest income on MBS of $1.2 million during the same
period.
The
decline in interest income on real estate loans during the year ended December
31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002 was attributable to a
decrease of 71 basis points in average yield during the period that resulted
from the reduction in long-term interest rates from October 2002 to June 2003.
This decline in interest rates stimulated the refinancing and prepayment of
higher rate loans in the Bank's portfolio, while also resulting in reduced rates
on existing portfolio loans that repriced during the period October 1, 2002 to
December 31, 2003. Partially offsetting the decline in interest income on real
estate loans resulting from reductions in yield was an increase in interest
income resulting from the increased average balance of real estate loans of
$64.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended
December 31, 2002. During the year ended December 31, 2003, real estate loan
originations totaled $1.10 billion, compared to $713.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2002. The increase was the result of declines in long-term
interest rates experienced during the period which stimulated a wave of mortgage
refinancing activities and contributed to higher property values and average
loan origination amounts.
The
Bank's general policy has been to emphasize growth in real estate loans as its
primary interest-earning asset, and de-emphasize its investment and MBS
portfolios while loan origination demand is strong. However, as part of a
specific investment strategy to achieve a desirable balance of yield and
liquidity on short-term investments in the prevailing interest rate environment,
the Bank purchased $531.0 million of MBS during the year ended December 31,
2003. This purchase level exceeded the level of MBS principal repayments of
$363.8 million and sales of $57.7 million during the same period. This resulted
in an overall increase of $178.9 million in the average balance of MBS during
the year ended December 31, 2003
compared
to the year ended December 31, 2002. However, due to the continuation of low
interest rates during the period October 1, 2002 through December 31, 2003, the
average yield on MBS declined from 5.04% during the year ended December 31, 2002
to 3.51% during the year ended December 31, 2003. The combination of these
factors resulted in a net increase in interest income on MBS of $1.2 million
during the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31,
2002.
Interest
income on investment securities declined $2.5 million as a result of a decline
of $57.0 million in average balance during the year ended December 31, 2003
compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, and a reduction of 30 basis points
in the average yield on these securities during the same period. The decline in
average balance reflects maturity and call activity experienced on these
securities as a result of the lower interest rate environment during the period
January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2003. The decline in average yield reflects
the decline in interest rates during the period January 1, 2003 through December
31, 2003, as higher coupon securities were called from the
portfolio.
Interest
income on other short-term investments decreased $722,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. The decline
reflects the continued low level of short-term interest rates during 2003, as
well as the decision by the FHLBNY not to pay a cash dividend to its
shareholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2003, which resulted in a
loss of approximately $400,000 of interest income by the Company.
Overall,
the yield on interest-earning assets declined 92 basis points from 6.72% during
the year ended December 31, 2002 to 5.80% during the year ended December 31,
2003. The continuation of low interest rates during the period January 1, 2003
through December 31, 2003 resulted in reductions in the average yield on MBS of
153 basis points and investment securities of 30 basis points during the year
ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. The yield
on real estate loans declined by 71 basis points during this period.
Interest
Expense. Interest
expense declined $20.7 million, to $71.1 million, during the year ended December
31, 2003, from $91.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2002. The
decline in interest expense resulted primarily from a reduction of $14.8 million
in interest expense on borrowed funds, which resulted from declines of $79.8
million in the average balance of borrowed funds and 148 basis points in the
average cost of borrowed funds during the year ended December 31, 2003 compared
to the year ended December 31, 2002.
During
the twelve months ended December 31, 2003, the Company prepaid $82.0 million of
borrowed funds, primarily higher cost REPOS, resulting in prepayment fees of
$4.1 million being added to interest expense during the year ended December 31,
2003. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, the Company prepaid
$297.0 million of borrowed funds, primarily REPOS, resulting in prepayment fees
of $8.4 million being added to interest expense during the year ended December
31, 2002. These prepayments of borrowings resulted in the significant reduction
in both average balance and average cost of borrowings during the year ended
December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002.
The
average cost of CDs, the next largest component of interest expense, declined by
81 basis points, resulting in a reduction in interest expense of $2.9 million
during the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31,
2002. The average cost of money market accounts and savings accounts declined by
64 basis points and 52 basis points, respectively, during the same period,
resulting in a reduction in interest cost of $1.1 million and $1.9 million,
respectively. These declines in average cost all reflected reductions in
interest rates offered by the Bank as a result of the overall interest rate
environment in effect during the period January 2003 through December 2003.
Substantially offsetting the declines in interest cost of CDs, money market
accounts and savings accounts that resulted from reduced average costs was
increased interest expense associated with increased average balances of $112.6
million in CDs, $146.5 million in money market accounts and $4.1 million in
savings accounts during the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2002. These increased average balances reflected successful
deposit gathering promotions of the Bank during the period January 1, 2003 to
December 31, 2003.
Provision
for Loan Losses. The
provision for loan losses was $288,000 during the year ended December 31, 2003
and $240,000 during the year ended December 31, 2002. During the year ended
December 31, 2003, the Company added $240,000 to its loan loss provision related
to expected losses on real estate loans, and $48,000 to its loan loss provision
related to expected losses on consumer loans (See "Item 1.
Business - Allowance for Loan Losses").
Non-Interest
Income.
Non-interest income increased $5.1 million, to $25.1 million, during the year
ended December 31, 2003, from $20.0 million during the year ended December 31,
2002.
During
the year ended December 31, 2003, a net loss on the sale of MBS and other
short-term investments totaled $1.9 million. During the year ended December 31,
2002, net gains on sales of equity investment securities totaled $2.0 million.
During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Bank recorded net gains
of $1.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively, on the sale of loans, primarily
from the sale of multifamily residential loans to FNMA.
Service
charges and other fees increased $1.5 million due primarily to increased fees on
loans and deposits that resulted from both increased loan origination and
attendant servicing (as a result of the low interest rate environment) and
growth in deposit households as a result of ongoing deposit product promotions.
Other non-interest income increased $8.0 million due to increased prepayment fee
income of $8.0 million, as a result of prepayments related to the low interest
rate environment.
Non-Interest
Expense.
Non-interest expense was $40.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2003,
an increase of $2.1 million over the year ended December 31, 2002.
Salary
and employee benefits increased $691,000 during the period due to general salary
and staffing increases during the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the
year ended December 31, 2002. In addition, the increase in the average price of
the Company's common stock during the year ended December 31, 2003 resulted in
increased ESOP expense of $296,000 during the year ended December 31, 2003
compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase was partially offset
by a decrease of $223,000 of expense associated with the RRP for which the final
vesting of the original grant of 1,309,275 shares concluded during
2002.
Occupancy and equipment expense increased $758,000 during the comparative period
due primarily to a renovation program on existing branches that was not eligible
to be capitalized, as well as from a full year of expenses due to the addition
of the Glen Oaks branch, which commenced operations near the end of the June
2002, and the Bay Ridge Branch, which commenced operations in March
2002.
Data
processing costs increased $411,000 during the comparative period due to
additional systems activity related to growth in the loan portfolio and
additional deposit activity.
Income
Tax Expense. Income
tax expense increased $4.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2003
compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, due primarily to an increase of
$10.9 million in pre-tax net income.
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2002 and the
Unaudited Six Months Ended December 31, 2001
General. Net
income was $23.5 million during the six months ended December 31, 2002, an
increase of $6.0 million over net income of $17.5 million during the six months
ended December 31, 2001. During the six months ended December 31, 2002 compared
to the six months ended December 31, 2001, net interest income increased $7.8
million, non-interest income increased $5.2 million and non-interest expense
increased $3.3 million, resulting in increased pre-tax income of $9.7 million.
Income tax expense increased $3.7 million as a result of the increased pre-tax
income.
Net
Interest Income. Net
interest income for the six months ended December 31, 2002 increased $7.9
million to $47.2 million from $39.3 million during the six months ended December
31, 2001. This increase was attributable to a decline of $10.5 million in
interest expense that was partially offset by a decline of $2.7 million in
interest income during the six months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the
six months ended December 31, 2001. The net interest spread increased 46 basis
points from 2.61% for the six months ended December 31, 2001 to 3.07% for the
six months ended December 31, 2002, and the net interest margin increased 40
basis points from 3.01% to 3.41% during the same period.
The
increase in both the net interest spread and net interest margin reflected a 103
basis point decline in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, as well
as a shift in the composition of interest-bearing liabilities away from higher
cost borrowings and towards lower cost money market and other deposit accounts.
During the six months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the six months ended
December 31, 2001, the average balance of deposits, including
non-interest-bearing checking accounts, increased as a result of ongoing deposit
marketing promotions and customer sales activities. In addition, the average
balance of real estate loans increased during the six months ended December 31,
2002 compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001, and the average rate on
real estate loans was less susceptible to fluctuations in interest rates than
other interest-earning assets since real estate loans possess a longer average
term to their maturity or next interest rate reset.
During
the period January 2001 through December 2001, the overnight inter-bank
borrowing rate declined on eleven different occasions, moving from an initial
rate of 6.5% to an ending rate of 1.75%. During the period January 2002 through
October 2002, the overnight inter-bank borrowing rate remained constant at
1.75%. In November 2002, the overnight inter-bank borrowing rate declined to
1.25%. Because the Bank's liabilities generally possess a shorter average term
to maturity than its assets, the net interest margin and net interest spread
both benefited from the reductions in interest rates during 2001. A significant
portion of the benefit of liabilities repricing to lower rates was realized
during the period January 2002 through December 31, 2002.
Interest
Income. Interest
income was $90.5 million during the six months ended December 31, 2002, a
decrease of $2.7 million from $93.1 million during the six months ended December
31, 2001. Declines in interest income on MBS of $4.3 million and on other
short-term investments of $509,000 during the six months ended December 31, 2002
compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001 were partially offset by an
increase in interest income on real estate loans of $2.5 million during the same
period.
The
Bank's general policy has been to emphasize growth in real estate loans as its
primary interest-earning asset, and de-emphasize its investment and MBS
portfolios while loan origination demand is strong. Consistent with this policy,
total principal repayments on MBS exceeded net purchases of MBS by $117.2
million during the period October 1, 2001 through June 30, 2002. However, as
part of a specific investment strategy to achieve a desirable balance of yield
and liquidity on short-term investments, the Bank purchased $224.6 million of
MBS during the six months ended December 31, 2002. This purchase level exceeded
the level of principal repayments of $148.5 million during the same period. The
combination of all activity during the period October 2001 through December 2002
resulted in an overall decline of $62.4 million in the average balance of MBS
during the six months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the six months ended
December 31, 2001. In addition, due to short-term interest rate reductions
during the period January 2001 through December 2001, and the continuation of
low short-term interest rates during the period January 1, 2002 through December
31, 2002, the average yield on MBS declined from 5.97% during the six months
ended December 31, 2001 to 4.58% during the six months ended December 31,
2002.
The
decline of $509,000 in interest income on short-term investments resulted from a
decrease of 137 basis points in average yield on these investments, reflecting
gradual reductions in interest rates during the period January 2001 through
December 2001 and in late 2002. The decline in yields on these investments more
than offset the increase in interest income that would have otherwise resulted
from growth in their average balance of $17.5 million during the six months
ended December 31, 2002 compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001.
Growth in average balance during the period reflected increased liquid funds
generated during the period January 2002 through December 2002 from both deposit
growth and higher real estate loan and MBS principal repayments.
The
increase in interest income on real estate loans was attributable to an increase
of $170.7 million in the average balance of real estate loans resulting from
real estate loan originations during the period January 1, 2002 through December
31, 2002. During the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, real estate
loan originations totaled $424.4 million and $263.5 million, respectively. Loan
originations increased during the six months ended December 31, 2002 as a result
of declines in long-term interest rates experienced during the period which
stimulated a wave of mortgage refinancing activities and contributed to higher
property values and average loan origination amounts.
Overall,
the yield on interest-earning assets declined 58 basis points from 7.12% during
the six months ended December 31, 2001 to 6.54% during the six months ended
December 31, 2002. Declines in the overnight inter-bank borrowing rate brought
about by the actions of the FOMC during the period January 2001 through December
2001, along with the continuation of low interest rates during the period
January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002, contributed to general decreases in
interest rates, resulting in reductions in the average yield on MBS of 139 basis
points, on investment securities of 141 basis points and on other (short-term)
investments of 137 basis points during the six months ended December 31, 2002
compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001. The yield on real estate
loans declined by only 37 basis points during this period. Real estate loans
possess longer terms to maturity or interest rate repricing and, therefore,
reacted slower than other interest-earning assets to the declines in long-term
interest rates during the six months ended December 31, 2002.
Interest
Expense. Interest
expense declined $10.5 million, to $43.3 million during the six months ended
December 31, 2002, from $53.8 million during the six months ended December 31,
2001. The decline in interest expense resulted substantially from a reduction of
$5.6 million in interest expense on borrowed funds, which resulted from a
decline of $227.7 million in the average balance of borrowed funds during the
six months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the six months ended December 31,
2001. The average cost of CDs, the next largest component of interest expense,
declined by 129 basis points, resulting in a reduction in interest expense of
$2.9 million during the six months ended December 31, 2002 compared to the six
months ended December 31, 2001. The average cost of money market accounts and
savings accounts also declined by 152 basis points and 83 basis points,
respectively, during the same period, resulting in a reduction in interest cost
of $621,000 and $1.4 million, respectively. These declines in average cost all
reflected reductions in interest rates offered by the Bank as a result of the
overall interest rate environment in effect during the period January 2002
through December 2002.
Non-Interest
Income.
Non-interest income increased $5.2 million to $10.8 million during the six
months ended December 31, 2002, from $5.6 million during the six months ended
December 31, 2001. The increase resulted primarily from increased prepayment fee
income (included in other non-interest income) of $2.8 million, as loan
prepayments increased during the period due to both declines in interest rates
during the period January 2001 through December 2001 and continued low interest
rates during the period January 2002 through December 2002. In addition, fee
income grew $365,000 due primarily to additional loan fees of $213,000 resulting
from increased origination activity, and an increase of $90,000 in deposit
customer fees resulting from growth in deposit activity.
Under the
terms of an agreement entered into in December 2002, the Bank sold approximately
$73.4 million of recently-originated multifamily residential loans to FNMA
during December 2002, recording a pre-tax gain of $2.0 million on these loan
sales. Otherwise, gains and losses on the sale of assets were immaterial during
the six months ended December 31, 2002 and 2001.
Non-Interest
Expense.
Non-interest expense was $20.4 million during the six months ended December 31,
2002, an increase of $3.3 million over the six months ended December 31, 2001.
Salary
and employee benefits increased $2.5 million during the six months ended
December 31, 2002 compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001, as a
result of increased salaries and staffing during the six months ended
December 31, 2002, reflecting growth in personnel added to satisfy needs created
by the increased size of the Bank, as well as growth in loans and deposit
balances, and added deposit products during the six months ended December 31,
2002 compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001. The benefit cost
associated with the BMP increased $1.1 million during the six months ended
December 31, 2002 compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001 due to the
accelerated expense accruals of 12-month expenses over a 6-month period. The
accelerated expense accruals resulted from a change in expense accrual
methodology resulting from the change in the fiscal year-end of both the Holding
Company and Bank from June 30th to
December 31st. The
benefit costs associated with the ESOP, which are calculated based upon the
average market value of the Holding Company's common stock, additionally
increased $300,000 due to an increase in the average market value of the Holding
Company's common stock during the six months ended December 31, 2002 compared to
the six months ended December 31, 2001.
Data
processing costs increased $144,000 during the six months ended December 31,
2002 compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001, due to additional
systems activity related to growth in the loan portfolio and additional deposit
activity.
Other
expenses increased $899,000 during the period due primarily to growth in
advertising expenses of $152,000, as well as an increase in administrative costs
totaling approximately $200,000 associated with the change in fiscal year-end
and six-month report period ending December 31, 2002.
Income
Tax Expense. Income
tax expense increased $3.7 million during the six months ended December 31, 2002
compared to the six months ended December 31, 2001, due primarily to an increase
of $9.7 million in pre-tax net income.
Comparison
of Operating Results for the Years Ended June 30, 2002 and
2001
General. Net
income was $38.7 million during the year ended June 30, 2002, an increase of
$13.5 million over net income of $25.2 million during the year ended June 30,
2001. During the year ended June 30, 2002 compared to the year ended June 30,
2001, net interest income increased $14.7 million, the provision for loan losses
declined $500,000, non-interest income increased $5.5 million and non-interest
expense increased $335,000, resulting in increased pre-tax income of $20.4
million. Goodwill amortization, which was $4.6 million during the year ended
June 30, 2001, was eliminated during the year ended June 30, 2002 pursuant to
the adoption of SFAS 142 effective July 1, 2001, partially offsetting an
increase of $5.0 million in non-interest expense. Income tax expense increased
$7.0 million as a result of the increased pre-tax income.
Net
Interest Income. Net
interest income for the year ended June 30, 2002 increased $14.7 million to
$82.3 million from $67.6 million during the year ended June 30, 2001. This
growth was attributable to both an increase of $2.9 million in interest income
and a decline of $11.8 million in interest expense during the year ended June
30, 2002 compared to the year ended June 30, 2001. The net interest spread
increased 38 basis points from 2.32% for the year ended June 30, 2001 to 2.70%
for the year ended June 30, 2002, and the net interest margin increased 36 basis
points from 2.76% to 3.12% during the same period.
The
increase in net interest spread and net interest margin both reflected a 78
basis point decline in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, as well
as a shift in the composition of interest-bearing liabilities away from higher
cost borrowings and towards lower cost money market and other deposit accounts.
During the year ended June 30, 2002 compared to the year ended June 30, 2001,
the average balance of deposits, including non-interest-bearing checking
accounts, increased as a result of ongoing deposit marketing promotions and
customer sales activities. In addition, the average balance of real estate loans
increased during the twelve months ended June 30, 2002, and the average rate on
real estate loans was less susceptible to changes in interest rates than other
interest-earning assets since real estate loans possess a longer average term to
their maturity or next interest rate reset.
During
the period January 2001 through December 2001, the FOMC reduced the overnight
inter-bank borrowing rate on eleven different occasions, moving from a beginning
rate of 6.5% to an ending rate of 1.75%. Because the Bank's liabilities
generally possess a shorter average term to maturity than its assets, the net
interest margin and net interest spread both benefited from these reductions in
interest rates.
The
increase in net interest margin additionally reflected growth in the ratio of
interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities from 109.33% during the
year ended June 30, 2001 to 110.99% during the year ended June 30, 2002,
reflecting additional equity generated during the period, a portion of which was
invested in interest-earning assets.
Interest
Income. Interest
income was $184.6 million during the year ended June 30, 2002, an increase of
$2.9 million from $181.7 million during the year ended June 30, 2001. Increased
interest income on real estate loans of $13.9 million during the year ended June
30, 2002 compared to the year ended June 30, 2001 was partially offset by
declines in interest income on MBS of $7.8 million, on investment securities of
$2.5 million and on other short-term investments of $558,000 during the same
period. As part of its ongoing strategy, the Bank continued to emphasize growth
in real estate loans as its primary interest-earning asset, and de-emphasized
its securities portfolio while loan origination demand was strong. The increase
in interest income on real estate loans was attributable to an increase of
$223.9 million in the average balance of real estate loans resulting from real
estate loan originations during the period July 1, 2000 through June 30, 2002 as
a result of lower interest rates. During the years ended June 30, 2002 and 2001,
real estate loan originations totaled $552.5 million and $398.3 million,
respectively. The increase reflected lower interest rates.
The
decline of $7.8 million in interest income on MBS and $2.5 million on investment
securities resulted from declines in both the average interest rate and average
balance of these assets. During the year ended June 30, 2002 compared to the
year ended June 30, 2001, the average balance of MBS declined $71.0 million and
investment securities declined $13.1 million, due to principal repayments,
maturities and calls of these securities (as a result of lower interest rates)
that were partially offset by purchase activity. Interest income on other
short-term investments declined by $558,000 due to a decline of 288 basis points
in average yield during the year ended June 30, 2002 compared to the year ended
June 30, 2001, reflecting declines in short-term interest rates during the
period January 2001 through December 2001.
Overall,
the yield on interest-earning assets declined 40 basis points from 7.41% during
the year ended June 30, 2001 to 7.01% during the year ended June 30, 2002.
Declines in the overnight inter-bank borrowing rate brought about by actions of
the FOMC during the period January 2001 through December 2001 contributed to
general decreases in interest rates, resulting in a reduction in the average
yield of 86 basis points on MBS, 155 basis points on investment securities and
288 basis points on other (short-term) investments during the year ended June
30, 2002 compared to the year ended June 30, 2001. The yield on real estate
loans declined by only 16 basis points during this period. Real estate loans
possess longer terms to maturity or interest rate repricing and, therefore,
reacted slower than other interest-earning assets to the declines in interest
rates during the twelve months ended June 30, 2002.
Interest
Expense. Interest
expense declined $11.8 million, to $102.2 million during the year ended June 30,
2002, from $114.0 million during the year ended June 30, 2001. The decline in
interest expense resulted substantially from a reduction of $10.5 million in
interest expense on borrowed funds, which resulted from a decline of $166.2
million in the average balance of borrowed funds during the year ended June 30,
2002 compared to the year ended June 30, 2001. The average cost of CDs, the next
largest component of interest expense, declined by 103 basis points, resulting
in a reduction in interest expense of $3.8 million during the year ended June
30, 2002 compared to the year ended June 30, 2001. The average cost of money
market accounts also declined 142 basis points during the same period. The
average cost of savings accounts declined 44 basis points during the year ended
June 30, 2002 compared to the year ended June 30, 2001, resulting in a decline
in interest cost of $1.7 million during the period. These declines in average
cost all reflected reductions in interest rates due to actions of the FOMC
during the period January 2001 through December 2001.
Interest
expense on money market accounts increased $4.1 million during the year ended
June 30, 2002 compared to the year ended June 30, 2001, despite the decline of
142 basis points in average cost during the period, resulting from an increase
of $235.7 million in the average balance of these deposits during this period.
The growth in the average balance of money market accounts resulted from ongoing
marketing promotions related to these accounts.
Provision for
Loan Losses. The
provision for loan losses was $240,000 during the year ended June 30, 2002,
compared to $740,000 during the year ended June 30, 2001. During the quarter
ended December 31, 2000, an additional provision of $500,000 was recorded
related to a loan added to troubled-debt restructurings. The provision of
$240,000 during the year ended June 30, 2002 reflected the growth in the loan
portfolio during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2002. Due to net charge-offs
of $329,000 recorded during the year ended June 30, 2002, the allowance for loan
losses declined $89,000 during the same period. During the year ended June 30,
2002, overall asset quality required no additional provisions beyond the
$240,000 allocated to cover loan portfolio growth during the period.
Non-Interest
Income.
Non-interest income increased $5.5 million, to $14.8 million, during the year
ended June 30, 2002, from $9.3 million during the year ended June 30, 2001. The
increase resulted primarily from increased prepayment fee income (included in
other non-interest income) of $3.9 million, as loan prepayments increased during
the period due to declines in interest rates. In addition, fee income increased
$277,000 during the year due to increased deposit customer fees resulting from
both added depositors and changes in fees charged during the period. During the
year ended June 30, 2002, a gain on the sale of securities and other assets of
$2.1 million was recorded, primarily from the sale of equity investments. During
the year ended June 30, 2001, a gain of $1.0 million on the sale of securities
and other assets was recorded which also related primarily to sales of equity
investments. The gains on sales of equity securities during the twelve months
ended June 30, 2002 were utilized to offset a portion of expenses associated
with the prepayment of FHLBNY Advances during the year.
Non-Interest
Expense.
Non-interest expense was $35.4 million during the year ended June 30, 2002,
$335,000 above the level during the year ended June 30, 2001.
Salary
and employee benefits increased $3.4 million during the year ended June 30, 2002
compared to the year ended June 30, 2001, as a result of growth in management
and employees added to satisfy needs created by the following: (1) growth in
loan portfolio balance; (2) growth in deposit balances; (3) added deposit
products; and (4) two new retail branches. The employee benefit costs associated
with the ESOP, which are calculated based upon the average market value of the
Holding Company's common stock, increased $778,000 due to an increase in the
average market value of the Holding Company's common stock during the period,
and were offset by the reduction of $776,000 in expenses associated with the
RRP, as the amortization of the initial stock awards under the RRP was completed
on February 1, 2002.
Increased
data processing costs of $332,000 during the twelve months ended June 30, 2002
compared to the year ended June 30, 2001 resulted from additional systems
activity related to growth in the loan portfolio and additional deposit
activity.
Other
expenses increased $1.2 million during the twelve months ended June 30, 2002
compared to the twelve months ended June 30, 2001, due primarily to growth in
public relations expenses of $206,000, marketing expenses of $345,000, as well
as various branch administrative expenses such as supplies, postage and
protective services associated with increased customer activities and two new
branches added during the twelve month period ended June 30, 2002.
Income
Tax Expense. Income
tax expense increased $7.0 million during the year ended June 30, 2002 compared
to the year ended June 30, 2001, due primarily to an increase of $20.4 million
in pre-tax net income. The effective tax rate decreased from 38.5% to 37.1%
during the period, due to the implementation of certain operational and
investment activities that resulted in a reduction in the Company's effective
tax rate.
Impact
of Inflation and Changing Prices
The Financial
Statements and Notes thereto presented herein have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP, which requires the measurement of financial position and operating
results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the
relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of
inflation is reflected in the increased costs of operations. Unlike industrial
companies, nearly all of the Company's consolidated assets and liabilities are
monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on the
Company's consolidated performance than do the effects of general levels of
inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily fluctuate in the same direction or
to the same extent as the price of goods and services.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In March
2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a consensus on Issue No.
03-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments" ("EITF 03-1"). EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining
when an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired, including whether an
investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment until recovery. In
addition, EITF 03-1 contains disclosure requirements regarding impairments that
have not been recognized as other than temporary. Except as discussed in the
following paragraph, the guidance for evaluating whether an investment is
other-than-temporarily impaired was to be applied in other-than-temporary
impairment evaluations made in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004.
The disclosures were effective in annual financial statements for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2003 for investments accounted for under SFAS No. 115,
"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." For all
other investments within the scope of this Issue, the disclosures are effective
in annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The
additional disclosures for cost method investments are effective for fiscal
years ending after June 15, 2004. Comparative information for periods prior to
initial application is not required.
In
October 2004, the FASB issued proposed staff position ("FSP") EITF Issue 03-1-a,
"Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No.
03-1, 'The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments.'" The proposed staff position provided implementation
guidance with respect to debt securities that are impaired solely due to
interest rates and/or sector spreads and analyzed for other-than-temporary
impairment under paragraph 16 of EITF 03-1. In addition, in November 2004, the
FASB indefinitely delayed the effective date for the measurement and recognition
guidance contained in paragraphs 10 through 20 of EITF 03-1. Additionally, the
FASB issued a proposed staff position EITF Issue No. 03-1-1, which indefinitely
delayed the effective date of measurement and recognition guidance contained in
paragraphs 10 through 20 of EITF 03-1. Management will evaluate the impact of
adopting the application of the guidance for evaluating an other-than-temporary
impairment upon issuance of the guidance. However, management is applying
current guidance in evaluating losses for other than temporary
impairment.
In
November 2004, the EITF issued EITF No. 04-5, "Investors' Accounting for an
Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor is the Sole General
Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights" ("EITF 04-5"). EITF 04-5
provides a framework for addressing the question of when a sole general partner,
as defined in EITF 04-5, should consolidate a limited partner. In response to
EITF 04-5, the FASB issued Statement of Position 78-9-a ("SOP 78-9-a"), which
will amend Statement of Position 78-9, "Accounting for Investments in Real
Estate Ventures" ("SOP 78-9"), in order to provide consistency between
participation rights and consolidation of partnership interests defined in SOP
78-9 and EITF 04-5. Management does not expect that the adoption of either EITF
04-5 or SOP 78-9-a will have a material impact upon the Company's consolidated
statement of financial condition or results of operations.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 152, "Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 66 and 67,"
("SFAS 152"). SFAS 152 amends SFAS 66 to reference the financial accounting and
reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions provided in
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ('AICPA') Statement of
Position 04-2, "Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions" ("SOP
04-2"). SFAS 152 also amends SFAS 67 to state that the guidance for both
incidental operations and the costs incurred to sell the real estate projects
does not apply to real estate time-sharing transactions. Under SFAS 152,
guidance for operations and costs associated with time-sharing transactions will
be provided by SOP 04-2. The provisions of SFAS 152 are effective for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 152 is not
expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of
financial condition or results of operations.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets-
an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29," ("SFAS 153"). SFAS 153 amends APB Opinion
No. 29 by eliminating the specific exception for nonmonetary exchanges of
similar productive assets, and replaces it with a general exception for
exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Under
SFAS 153, a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash
flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the
exchange. The provisions of SFAS 153 are effective for nonmonetary asset
exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Early
application is permitted for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal
periods beginning after December 16, 2004. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 is not
expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of
financial condition or results of operations .
In
December , 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, ("SFAS
123R"), that addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions
(e.g., stock
options and awards of restricted stock) in which an employer receives employee
services in exchange for equity securities of the company or liabilities that
are based on the fair value of the company’s equity securities. The proposed
statement, if adopted as proposed, would eliminate APB 25 and would generally
require that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method
and the recording of compensation expense rather
than optional pro forma disclosure. Adoption of SFAS 123R is required for
quarterly periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Management of the Company is
still evaluating the impact of adoption of SFAS 123R upon its consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In May
2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement Position No. 106-2 ("FSP 106-2") to provide
guidance on accounting for the effects of the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the
"Act"), to employers that sponsor postretirement health care plans which provide
prescription drug benefits. FSP 106-2 supersedes FSP SFAS 106-1, Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements Related to Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement
and Modernization Act. FSP
SFAS 106-2 applies only to sponsors of single-employer defined benefit
postretirement health care plans for which (1) the employer has concluded that
prescription drug benefits available under the plan to some or all participants,
for some or all future years, are "actuarially equivalent" to Medicare Part D
and thus qualify for the subsidy provided by the Act, and (2) the expected
subsidy will offset or reduce the employer's share of the cost of the underlying
postretirement prescription drug coverage on which the subsidy is based. FSP
106-2 provides guidance on measuring the accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation ("APBO") and net periodic postretirement benefit cost, and the
effects of the Act on the APBO. Since the Company is currently assessing whether
the benefits provided by its postretirement benefit medical plan are actuarially
equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act, the measure of the APBO or net
periodic postretirement benefit cost disclosed in the consolidated financial
statements did not reflect any amount associated with the subsidy.
As a
depository financial institution, the Bank's primary source of market risk is
interest rate volatility. Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact
the level of interest income recorded on, and the market value of, a significant
portion of the Bank's assets. Fluctuations in interest rates will also
ultimately impact the level of interest expense recorded on, and the market
value of, a significant portion of the Bank's liabilities. In addition, the
Bank's real estate loan portfolio, concentrated primarily within the New York
City metropolitan area, is subject to risks associated with the local economy.
Neither
the Holding Company nor the Bank are subject to foreign currency exchange or
commodity price risk. In addition, the Company owned no trading assets, nor did
it engage in any hedging transactions utilizing derivative instruments (such as
interest rate swaps and caps) or embedded derivative instruments during the
years ended December 31, 2004 or 2003 that require bifurcation. In the future,
the Company may, with appropriate Board approval, engage in hedging transactions
utilizing derivative instruments.
Since a
majority of the Company's consolidated interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities are located at the Bank, virtually all of the
interest rate risk exposure exists at the Bank level. As a result, all of the
significant interest rate risk management procedures are performed at the Bank
level. The Bank's interest rate risk management strategy is designed to limit
the volatility of net interest income and preserve capital over a broad range of
interest rate movements and has three primary components.
Assets. The
Bank's largest single asset type is the adjustable-rate multifamily residential
loan. Multifamily residential loans typically carry shorter average terms to
maturity than one- to four-family residential loans, thus significantly reducing
the overall level of interest rate risk. Approximately 85% of multifamily
residential loans originated during the twelve months ended December 31, 2004
were adjustable rate, with repricing typically occurring after five or seven
years, compared to approximately 80% during the twelve months ended December 31,
2003. In
addition, the Bank has sought to include in its portfolio various types of
adjustable-rate one- to four-family loans and adjustable and floating-rate
investment securities, which generally have repricing terms of three years or
less. At December 31, 2004, adjustable-rate real estate and consumer loans
totaled $2.00 billion, or 59.4% of total assets, and
adjustable-rate investment securities (CMOs, REMICs, MBS issued by GSEs and
other securities) totaled $23.1 million, or 0.7% of total assets. At December
31, 2003, adjustable-rate real estate and consumer loans totaled $1.67 billion,
or 56.1% of total assets, and adjustable-rate investment securities (CMOs,
REMICs, MBS issued by GSEs and other securities) totaled $44.4 million, or 0.7%
of total assets.
Deposit
Liabilities. As a
traditional community-based savings bank, the Bank is largely dependent upon its
base of competitively priced core deposits to provide stability on the liability
side of the balance sheet. The Bank has retained many loyal customers over the
years through a combination of quality service, convenience, and a stable and
experienced staff. Core deposits, at December 31, 2004, were $1.25 billion, or
56.5% of total deposits. The balance of CDs as of December 31, 2004 was $960.0
million, or 43.5% of total deposits, of which $734.8 million, or 76.6%, were to
mature within one year. The weighted average maturity of the Bank's CDs at
December 31, 2004 was 9.0 months compared to 11.7 months at December 31, 2003.
While the Bank generally prices its CDs in an effort to encourage the extension
of the average maturities of deposit liabilities beyond one year, the decline in
the average maturity of CDS during the year ended December 31, 2004 reflected
customers recognition that short-term interest rates were at historically low
levels and were increasing during the period.
Wholesale
Funds. The
Bank is a member of the FHLBNY, which provided the Bank with a borrowing line of
up to $993.5 million at December 31, 2004. The Bank
borrows from the FHLBNY for various purposes. At December 31, 2004, the Bank had
outstanding Advances of $506.5 million with the FHLBNY.
The Bank
has authority to accept brokered deposits as a source of funds. The Bank had no
outstanding brokered deposits at either December 31, 2004 or December 31, 2003.
The Bank
regularly monitors its interest rate sensitivity through the calculation of an
interest sensitivity GAP. The interest sensitivity GAP is the difference between
the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
anticipated to mature or reprice within a specific period. The interest
sensitivity GAP is considered positive when the amount of interest-earning
assets anticipated to mature or reprice within a specified time frame exceeds
the amount of interest-bearing liabilities anticipated to mature or reprice
within the same period. Conversely, the interest sensitivity GAP is considered
negative when the amount of interest-bearing liabilities anticipated to mature
or reprice within a specific time frame exceeds the amount of interest-earning
assets anticipated to mature or reprice within the same period. In a rising
interest rate environment, an institution with a positive interest sensitivity
GAP would generally be expected, absent the effects of other factors, to
experience a greater increase in the yields of its assets relative to the costs
of its liabilities and thus an increase in its net interest income, whereas an
institution with a negative interest sensitivity GAP would generally be expected
to experience a decline in net interest income. Conversely, in a declining
interest rate environment, an institution with a positive interest sensitivity
GAP would generally be expected, absent the effects of other factors, to
experience a greater decline in the yields of its assets relative to the costs
of its liabilities and thus a decrease in its net interest income, whereas an
institution with a negative interest sensitivity GAP would generally be expected
to experience an increase in interest income.
The table
presented on the next page sets forth the amounts of the Company's consolidated
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities outstanding at December
31, 2004 which are anticipated, based upon certain assumptions, to reprice or
mature in each of the future time periods shown. Except as stated below, the
amount of assets and liabilities shown repricing or maturing during a particular
period reflect the earlier of term to repricing or maturity of the asset or
liability. The table is intended to provide an approximation of the projected
repricing of assets and liabilities at December 31, 2004 on the basis of
contractual maturities, anticipated prepayments, and scheduled rate adjustments
within a three-month period and subsequent selected time intervals. For purposes
of presentation in the table, the Bank utilized its historical deposit attrition
experience ("Deposit Decay Rate") for savings accounts, which it believes to be
the most accurate measure. For NOW, Super NOW and money market accounts, it
utilized the Deposit Decay Rates published by the OTS. All amounts calculated in
the table for both loans and MBS reflect principal balances expected to reprice
as a result of anticipated principal repayments (inclusive of early repayments)
or as a result of contractual interest rate adjustments.
There are
certain limitations inherent in the method of analysis presented in the table on
the next page. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have
similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may not react correspondingly
to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types
of assets and liabilities may fluctuate with changes in market interest rates,
while interest rates on other types of assets may lag behind changes in market
rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate loans, have
features, like annual and lifetime rate caps, which restrict changes in interest
rates both on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the
event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels
would likely deviate from those assumed in the table. Finally, the ability of
certain borrowers to make scheduled payments on their adjustable-rate loans may
decrease in the event of an interest rate increase.
At
December 31, 2004 |
3
Months
or
Less |
More
than
3
Months to
6
Months |
More
than 6 Months
to
1 Year |
More
than
1
Year
to
3 Years |
More
than
3
Years
to
5 Years |
More
than
5
Years |
Non-interest
bearing |
Total |
|
(Dollars
in Thousands) |
Interest-Earning
Assets (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages
and
other loans |
$87,601 |
$87,600 |
$175,202 |
$693,891 |
$693,891 |
$763,620 |
- |
$2,501,805 |
Investment
securities |
23,210 |
- |
10,993 |
4,057 |
10,210 |
6,955 |
- |
55,425 |
Mortgage-backed
securities (2) |
34,652 |
34,652 |
69,304 |
164,285 |
93,050 |
123,942 |
- |
519,885 |
Other
short-term
investments |
103,291 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
103,291 |
FHLBNY
capital
stock |
25,325 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25,325 |
Total
interest-
earning assets |
274,079 |
122,252 |
255,499 |
862,233 |
797,151 |
894,517 |
- |
3,205,731 |
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan
losses |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$(15,543) |
(15,543) |
Net
interest-earning
assets |
274,079 |
122,252 |
255,499 |
862,233 |
797,151 |
894,517 |
(15,543) |
3,190,188 |
Non-interest-earning
assets |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
187,078 |
187,078 |
Total
assets |
$274,079 |
$122,252 |
$255,499 |
$862,233 |
$797,151 |
$894,517 |
$171,535 |
$3,377,266 |
Interest-Bearing
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
accounts |
$12,573 |
$12,146 |
$23,068 |
$76,808 |
$58,072 |
$179,989 |
- |
$362,656 |
NOW
and Super
NOW
accounts |
4,179 |
3,792 |
6,565 |
14,916 |
4,616 |
11,110 |
- |
45,178 |
Money
market
accounts |
147,935 |
118,718 |
171,727 |
147,724 |
77,479 |
85,457 |
- |
749,040 |
Certificates
of
deposit |
330,763 |
288,769 |
115,314 |
190,353 |
34,752 |
- |
- |
959,951 |
Borrowed
funds |
185,000 |
- |
60,000 |
230,000 |
90,584 |
146,500 |
- |
712,084 |
Subordinated
notes |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25,000 |
|
25,000 |
Trust
preferred
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
72,165 |
|
72,165 |
Interest-bearing
escrow |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1,800 |
- |
1,800 |
Total
interest-
bearing liabilities |
680,450 |
423,425 |
376,674 |
659,801 |
265,503 |
522,021 |
- |
2,927,874 |
Checking
accounts |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
$93,224 |
93,224 |
Other
non-interest
bearing liabilities |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
74,447 |
74,447 |
Stockholders'
equity |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
281,721 |
281,721 |
Total
liabilities and
stockholders' equity |
$680,450 |
$423,425 |
$376,674 |
$659,801 |
$265,503 |
$522,021 |
$449,392 |
$3,377,266 |
Positive
(Negative)
interest sensitivity
GAP per period |
$(406,371) |
$(301,173) |
$(121,175) |
$202,432 |
$531,648 |
$372,496 |
- |
|
Positive
(Negative)
cumulative interest
sensitivity GAP |
$(406,371) |
$(707,544) |
$(828,719) |
$(626,287) |
$(94,639) |
$277,857 |
- |
|
Cumulative
interest
sensitivity GAP as
a percent of total
assets |
(12.03)% |
(20.95)% |
(24.54)% |
(18.54)% |
(2.80)% |
8.23% |
- |
|
Cumulative
total
interest-earning
assets as a percent
of cumulative total
interest-bearing
liabilities |
40.28% |
35.90% |
44.03% |
70.74% |
96.07% |
109.49% |
- |
|
(1) |
Interest-earning
assets are included in the period in which the balances are expected to be
redeployed and/or repriced as a result of anticipated prepayments,
scheduled rate adjustments, and contractual maturities or
calls. |
(2) |
Based
upon historical repayment experience, and, where applicable, balloon
payment dates. |
The
Company's consolidated balance sheet is composed primarily of assets that mature
or reprice within five years, with a significant portion maturing or repricing
within one year. In addition, the Bank's deposit base is composed primarily of
savings accounts, money market accounts and CDs with maturities of two years or
less. At December 31, 2004, interest-bearing liabilities estimated to mature or
reprice within one year totaled $1.48 billion, while interest-earning assets
estimated to mature or reprice within one year totaled $651.8 million, resulting
in a negative one-year interest sensitivity GAP of $828.7 million, or negative
24.5% of total assets. In comparison, at December 31, 2003, the Company's
consolidated one-year interest sensitivity GAP was negative $327.7 million, or
negative 11.0% of total assets. The increase in the magnitude of the one-year
negative interest sensitivity GAP resulted from a decline in the level of real
estate loans and MBS maturing or repricing in one year or less reflecting
declines in expected repayment levels of these assets during 2005 due to
increases in interest rates that occurred during the second half of 2004,
coupled with an increase in CDs repricing during 2005, reflecting new CDs added
during 2004 that will mature in 2005.
Under
interest rate scenarios other than that which existed on December 31, 2004, the
interest sensitivity GAP for assets and liabilities could differ substantially
based upon different assumptions about the manner in which core Deposit Decay
Rates and loan prepayments would change. For example, the interest rate risk
management model assumes that in a rising rate scenario, by paying competitive
rates on non-core deposits, a portion of core deposits will transfer to CDs and
be retained, although at higher cost. Also, in a rising interest rate
environment, loan and MBS prepayment rates would be expected to slow, as
borrowers postpone loan refinancings until rates again decline.
Interest
Rate Risk Exposure (NPV) Compliance
Under
guidelines established by OTS Thrift Bulletin 13a, the Bank also measures its
interest rate risk through an analysis of the change in its NPV under several
interest rate scenarios. NPV is the difference between the present value of the
expected future cash flows of the Bank’s assets and liabilities, plus the value
of net expected cash flows from either loan origination commitments or purchases
of securities.
Generally,
the fair value of fixed-rate instruments fluctuates inversely with changes in
interest rates. Increases in interest rates could thus result in decreases in
the fair value of interest-earning assets, which could adversely affect the
Company's consolidated results of operations if they were to be sold, or, in the
case of interest-earning assets classified as available for sale, reduce the
Company's consolidated stockholders' equity, if retained. The changes in the
value of assets and liabilities due to fluctuations in interest rates reflect
the interest rate sensitivity of those assets and liabilities. Under GAAP,
changes in the unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, on securities
classified as available for sale are reflected in stockholders' equity through
other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2004, the Company's consolidated
securities portfolio included $574.3 million in securities classified as
available for sale, which possessed a gross unrealized loss of $5.9 million.
Neither the Holding Company nor the Bank owned any trading assets as of December
31, 2004 or 2003.
In order
to measure the Bank’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates, NPV is
calculated under market interest rates prevailing at a given quarter-end
("Pre-Shock Scenario"), and under various other interest rate scenarios ("Rate
Shock Scenarios") representing immediate, permanent, parallel shifts in the term
structure of interest rates from the actual term structure observed at
quarter-end. The changes in NPV due to fluctuations in interest rates reflect
the interest rate sensitivity of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and commitments
to either originate or sell loans and/or purchase or sell securities that are
included in the NPV. The NPV ratio under any interest rate scenario is defined
as the NPV in that scenario divided by the present value of the assets in the
same scenario (the "NPV Ratio").
An
interest rate risk exposure compliance report is presented to the Bank's Board
of Directors on a quarterly basis. The report, prepared in accordance with
Thrift Bulletin 13a, compares the Bank's estimated Pre-Shock NPV Scenario to the
estimated NPVs calculated under the various Rate Shock Scenarios. The calculated
estimates of the resulting NPV Ratios are compared to current limits established
by management and approved by the Board of Directors.
The
analysis that follows presents the estimated NPV in the Pre-Shock Scenario and
four Rate Shock Scenarios and measures the dollar amount and percentage by which
each of the Rate Shock Scenario NPVs change from the Pre-Shock Scenario NPV.
Interest rate sensitivity is measured by the changes in the various Rate Shock
Scenario NPV Ratios from the Pre-Shock Scenario NPV Ratio.
|
At
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Portfolio Value |
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
Dollar
Amount |
Dollar
Change |
Percentage
Change |
|
NPV
Ratio |
Basis
Point Change in NPV Ratio |
|
NPV
Ratio |
Basis
Point Change in NPV Ratio |
Board
Approved NPV Limit |
Interest
Rate Scenario |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+
200 Basis Points |
$291,494 |
$(96,643) |
(24.90)% |
|
8.94% |
(250) |
|
9.49% |
(157) |
6.0% |
+
100 Basis Points |
340,277 |
(47,860) |
(12.33) |
|
10.23 |
(121) |
|
10.59 |
(47) |
7.0 |
Pre-Shock |
388,137 |
- |
- |
|
11.44 |
- |
|
11.06 |
- |
8.0 |
-
100 Basis Points |
419,152 |
31,015 |
7.99 |
|
12.17 |
73 |
|
10.71 |
(35) |
8.0 |
-
200 Basis Points |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
N/A |
N/A |
8.0 |
The NPVs
presented above incorporate some asset and liability values derived from the
Bank’s valuation model, such as those for mortgage loans and time deposits, and
some asset and liability values that are provided by independent and reputable
sources, such as values for the Bank's MBS and CMO portfolios, as well as its
putable borrowings. The valuation model makes various estimates regarding cash
flows from principal repayments on loans and passbook deposit decay rates at
each level of interest rate change. The Bank's estimates for loan prepayment
levels are influenced by the recent history of prepayment activity in its loan
portfolio as well as the interest-rate composition of the existing portfolio,
especially vis-à-vis the current interest rate environment. In addition, the
Bank considers the amount of prepayment fee protection inherent in the loan
portfolio when estimating future prepayment cash flows.
Regarding
passbook Deposit Decay Rates, the Bank analyzes and tracks the decay rate of its
passbook deposits over time and over various interest rate scenarios and then
makes estimates of its passbook Deposit Decay Rate for use in the valuation
model. Nevertheless, no matter the care and precision with which the estimates
are derived, actual cash flows for loans, as well as passbooks, could differ
significantly from the Bank's estimates resulting in significantly different NPV
calculations.
The Bank
also generates a series of spot discount rates that are integral to the
valuation of the projected monthly cash flows of its assets and liabilities. The
Bank's valuation model employs discount rates that are representative of
prevailing market rates of interest, with appropriate adjustments suited to the
heterogeneous characteristics of the Bank’s various asset and liability
portfolios.
The NPV
Ratio at December 31, 2004 was 11.44% in the Pre-Shock Scenario, a slight
increase from the Pre-Shock Scenario NPV Ratio of 11.06% at December 31, 2003.
The NPV Ratio was 8.94% in the +200 basis point Rate Shock Scenario at December
31, 2004, a decline from the NPV Ratio of 9.49% in the +200 basis point Rate
Shock Scenario at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004, the measured
sensitivity in the +200 basis point Rate Shock Scenario was 250 basis points,
compared to a measured sensitivity of 157 basis points in the + 200 basis point
Rate Shock Scenario at December 31, 2003, reflecting increased sensitivity
year-over-year.
The
increase in the Pre-Shock Scenario NPV and Pre-Shock Scenario NPV Ratio resulted
primarily from several factors, including a significant increase in the
intangible value ascribed to the Bank’s core deposits; a strong increase in the
Bank’s balance of retained earnings, particularly in comparison to the more
modest proportionate increase in the Bank’s total assets; and a greater rate of
decline in the value of the Bank’s liabilities than that of its assets, which is
beneficial to the Bank’s NPV.
The
Bank’s core deposits at December 31, 2004 were slightly higher in both balance
and weighted average rate than at December 31, 2003. In addition, at December
31, 2004, the Bank’s balance of borrowings, generally of a short to medium term,
increased by over $150 million from its balance at December 31, 2003, while the
weighted average rate declined by approximately 20 basis points over the same
period.
During
2004, short term market interest rates increased by well over 100 basis points,
while medium to longer term rates increased by substantially lesser amounts.
These asymmetrical rate movements, essentially a flattening of the term
structure of interest rates, had the effect of markedly reducing the value of
the Bank’s liabilities, which tend to have short to medium term durations, while
having a proportionately lesser impact on the value of the Bank’s assets, which
derive a fair amount of their value from longer term cash flows. In addition,
the intangible value given to the Bank’s core deposits, which benefits the
Bank’s NPV calculation, increased by over 30%, even as the balance of deposit
liabilities increased by only 8%.
The +200
basis point Rate Shock Scenario NPV was lower at December 31, 2004 than at
December 31, 2003. This outcome was primarily the result of two factors.
Initially, the Bank’s primary interest-earning assets, its portfolio of
multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans, increased in duration
over the course of 2004 as new and refinanced loans were added to the portfolio.
The longer duration resulted in the portfolio showing a greater percentage
decline in market value in the December 31, 2004 +200 basis point Rate Shock
Scenario NPV than in the December 31, 2003 +200 basis point Rate Shock Scenario
NPV. In addition, the duration of the Bank’s portfolio of time deposits and
borrowings was shorter at December 31, 2004 than at December 31, 2003. The
shorter duration resulted in the portfolio of time deposits and borrowings
showing a smaller percentage decline in market value in the December 31, 2004
+200 basis point Rate Shock Scenario NPV than in the December 31, 2003 +200
basis point Rate Shock Scenario NPV .
Finally,
the Bank’s measured sensitivity for the +200 basis point Rate Shock Scenario NPV
Ratio at December 31, 2004 was 250 basis points, compared to 157 basis points at
December 31, 2003. The increased sensitivity was a reflection of both the
increased duration of the Bank’s multifamily residential and commercial real
estate loan portfolio and the shortened duration of the Bank’s time deposit and
borrowings portfolio at December 31, 2004 compared to December 31,
2003.
For the
Company's consolidated financial statements, see index on page 69.
None.
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Management
of the Company, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation, as of December 31, 2004, of the
effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer each found
that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in
the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the Company's
last quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company') is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting for the Company. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
is defined as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, a company’s
principal executive and principal financial officers, and effected by its Board
of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles ("GAAP"). The Company's internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts
and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The
Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, utilizing the criteria
established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission in "Internal Controls - Integrated Framework." Based upon its
assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2004, the Company's
internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Deloitte
& Touche LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm, has audited
management's assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, as stated in their report,
which is included below and which expresses unqualified opinions on management's
assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Stockholders and the Board of Directors of
Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have
audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s
Report of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Dime Community
Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
“Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The
Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the
company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting,
including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of
controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in
our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria
established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statements of financial
condition as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive
income and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
the six-month period ended December 31, 2002 and the year ended June 30, 2002 of
the Company and our report dated March 11, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion
on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York,
NY
March 11,
2005
PART
III
Information
regarding directors and executive officers of the Holding Company is presented
under the headings "Proposal 1 - Election of Directors, " "Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" and "Executive Officers" in the
Holding Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on May 19, 2005 (the "Proxy Statement") which will be
filed with the SEC within 120 days of December 31, 2004, and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Information
regarding the audit committee of the Company's Board of Directors, including
information regarding audit committee financial experts serving on the audit
committee, is presented under the heading Report of the Audit Committee in the
Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
The
Company has adopted a written Code of Ethics that applies to its principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Company will provide to
any person, without charge, upon request, a copy of such Code of Ethics. Such
request should be made in writing to: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc., 209
Havemeyer Street, Brooklyn, New York 11211, attention Investor
Relations.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information
regarding executive and director compensation is presented under the headings
"Directors' Compensation" and "Executive Compensation" in the Proxy Statement
and is incorporated herein by reference.
Information
regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is
included under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management" in the Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by
reference.
The
following table presents equity compensation plan information as of December 31,
2004:
Plan
Category |
|
Number
of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding
Options
(a) |
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options
(b) |
|
Number
of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans [Excluding Securities Reflected in Column
(a)]
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved
by
the Company's shareholders |
|
2,679,435 |
|
$11.87 |
|
1,851,256(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not
approved
by the Company's
shareholders |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
(1)
|
Amount
composed of 292,478 shares held by the RRP that remained available for
issuance to individual employees, officers or Outside Directors of the
Company as of December 31, 2004, and 62,478 stock options that remain
available for future issuance under the Stock Option Plans and 1,496,300
stock options that remain available for future issuance under the 2004
Stock Incentive Plan for Outside Directors, Officers and Employees of Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. (the "2004 Stock Incentive Plan").
Substantially all of the stock options remaining available for future
issuance are available under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
-66-
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions
Information
regarding certain relationships and related transactions is included under the
heading "Transactions with Certain Related Persons" in the Proxy Statement and
is incorporated herein by reference.
Information
regarding principal accounting fees and services as well as the Audit
Committee's pre-approval policies and procedures is included under the heading
"Proposal 2 - Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors," in the Proxy
Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART
IV
(a)
(1) Financial
Statements
(2) Financial
Statement Schedules
Financial
statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or not
required or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial
Statements or Notes thereto under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data."
(3) Exhibits
Required by Item 601 of the SEC Regulation S-K
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant certifies that it has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on
March 14, 2005.
DIME COMMUNITY BANCSHARES,
INC.
By:
/s/
VINCENT F. PALAGIANO
Vincent F.
Palagiano
Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below on March 14, 2005 by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities indicated.
Name
|
Title
|
/s/
VINCENT F. PALAGIANO
Vincent
F. Palagiano
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
executive officer) |
/s/
MICHAEL P. DEVINE
Michael
P. Devine
|
President
and Chief Operating Officer and Director
|
/s/
KENNETH J. MAHON
Kenneth
J. Mahon
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
/s/
ANTHONY BERGAMO
Anthony
Bergamo
|
Director
|
/s/
GEORGE L. CLARK, JR.
George
L. Clark, Jr.
|
Director
|
/s/
STEVEN D. COHN
Steven
D. Cohn
|
Director
|
/s/
PATRICK E. CURTIN
Patrick
E. Curtin
|
Director
|
/s/
JOSEPH H. FARRELL
Joseph
H. Farrell
|
Director
|
/s/
FRED P. FEHRENBACH
Fred
P. Fehrenbach
|
Director
|
/s/
JOHN J. FLYNN
John
J. Flynn
|
Director
|
/s/
STANLEY MEISELS
Stanley
Meisels
|
Director
|
/s/
LOUIS V. VARONE
Louis
V. Varone
|
Director
|
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
DIME
COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
Page |
|
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
|
74 |
|
75-111 |
To the
Stockholders and the Board of Directors of
Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive
income and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
the six-month period ended December 31, 2002 and the year ended June 30,
2002. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and
2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six-month period ended December 31, 2002
and the year ended June 30, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have
also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the criteria
established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated March 11, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s
assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York,
NY
March 11,
2005
DIME
COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Dollars
in thousands except share amounts)
|
December
31, 2004 |
December
31, 2003 |
|
|
|
Cash
and due from banks |
$26,581 |
$24,073 |
Federal
funds sold and short-term investments |
103,291 |
95,286 |
Encumbered
investment securities held-to-maturity (estimated fair value of
$589 and $718 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively) (Note
3): |
585 |
710 |
Unencumbered
investment securities available-for-sale (Note 3) |
54,840 |
37,107 |
Mortgage-backed
securities held-to-maturity (estimated fair value of $485 and $822 at
December
31, 2004 and 2003, respectively) (Note 4): |
|
|
Encumbered |
166 |
267 |
Unencumbered |
299 |
503 |
|
465 |
770 |
Mortgage-backed
securities available-for-sale (Note 4): |
|
|
Encumbered |
235,401 |
38,692 |
Unencumbered |
284,019 |
423,275 |
|
519,420 |
461,967 |
Loans
(Note 5): |
|
|
Real
estate |
2,493,398 |
2,186,518 |
Other
loans |
2,916 |
4,072 |
Less
allowance for loan losses (Note 6) |
(15,543) |
(15,018) |
Total
loans, net |
2,480,771 |
2,175,572 |
Loans
held for sale |
5,491 |
2,050 |
Premises
and fixed assets, net (Note 8) |
16,652 |
16,118 |
Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York capital stock (Note 9) |
25,325 |
26,700 |
Goodwill
(Note 1) |
55,638 |
55,638 |
Other
assets (Notes 7, 14 and 15) |
88,207 |
75,670 |
Total
Assets |
$3,377,266 |
$2,971,661 |
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
Due
to depositors (Note 10): |
|
|
Interest
bearing deposits |
$2,116,825 |
$1,949,372 |
Non-interest
bearing deposits |
93,224 |
92,306 |
Total
deposits |
$2,210,049 |
$2,041,678 |
Escrow
and other deposits (Note 7) |
48,284 |
39,941 |
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase (Note 11) |
205,584 |
12,675 |
Federal
Home Loan Bank of New York advances (Note 12) |
506,500 |
534,000 |
Subordinated
notes payable (Note 13) |
25,000 |
25,000 |
Trust
Preferred securities payable (Note 13) |
72,165 |
- |
Other
liabilities (Note 14 and 15) |
27,963 |
34,448 |
Total
Liabilities |
3,095,545 |
2,687,742 |
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note
16) |
|
|
Stockholders'
Equity: |
|
|
Preferred
stock ($0.01 par, 9,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding
at December
31, 2004 and 2003) |
- |
- |
Common
stock ($0.01 par, 125,000,000 shares authorized, 50,111,988 shares and
49,160,657
shares issued
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and 37,165,740 shares and
38,115,111 shares outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively) |
501 |
492 |
Additional
paid-in capital |
198,183 |
185,991 |
Retained
earnings (Note 2) |
258,237 |
231,771 |
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss, net of deferred taxes |
(3,228) |
(846) |
Unallocated
common stock of Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") (Note
15) |
(4,749) |
(5,202) |
Unearned
and unallocated common stock of Recognition and Retention Plan ("RRP")
(Note
15) |
(2,612) |
(2,617) |
Common
stock held by Benefit Maintenance Plan ("BMP') (Note 15) |
(7,348) |
(5,584) |
Treasury
stock, at cost (12,946,248 shares and 11,045,546 shares at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively) (Note 18) |
(157,263) |
(120,086) |
Total
Stockholders' Equity |
281,721 |
283,919 |
Total
Liabilities And Stockholders' Equity |
$3,377,266 |
$2,971,661 |
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars
in thousands except per share amounts)
|
Fiscal
Year Ended December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
June
30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Interest
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
secured by real estate |
$138,720 |
$145,704 |
|
$78,275 |
|
$153,970
|
Other
loans |
235 |
273 |
|
141 |
|
311
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
21,091 |
17,984 |
|
7,895 |
|
21,049
|
Investment
securities |
1,745 |
2,361 |
|
2,455 |
|
5,227
|
Other |
1,830 |
2,793 |
|
1,703 |
|
4,024
|
Total
interest income |
163,621 |
169,115 |
|
90,469 |
|
184,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
and escrow |
37,873 |
38,221 |
|
21,631 |
|
49,008
|
Borrowed
funds |
29,903 |
32,842 |
|
21,647 |
|
53,236
|
Total
interest expense |
67,776 |
71,063 |
|
43,278 |
|
102,244
|
Net
interest income |
95,845 |
98,052 |
|
47,191 |
|
82,337
|
Provision
for loan losses |
280 |
288 |
|
120 |
|
240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses |
95,565 |
97,764 |
|
47,071 |
|
82,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
charges and other fees |
6,296 |
6,518 |
|
2,687 |
|
4,699
|
Net
gain on sales of loans |
336 |
1,594 |
|
2,033 |
|
20
|
Net
gain (loss) on sales and redemptions of securities,
deposits and other assets |
377 |
(1,897) |
|
(21) |
|
2,146
|
Income
from Bank owned life insurance |
1,957 |
2,118 |
|
1,122 |
|
2,201 |
Prepayment
fee income |
9,797 |
15,432 |
|
4,270 |
|
4,610 |
Other |
1,750 |
1,357 |
|
674 |
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
non-interest income |
20,513 |
25,122 |
|
10,765 |
|
14,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and employee benefits |
19,880 |
20,371 |
|
10,549 |
|
17,061
|
ESOP
and RRP compensation expense |
3,573 |
2,542 |
|
1,216 |
|
2,990
|
Occupancy
and equipment |
5,213 |
5,054 |
|
2,221 |
|
4,099
|
Data
processing costs |
3,459 |
2,694 |
|
1,149 |
|
2,139
|
Federal
deposit insurance premiums |
343 |
330 |
|
151 |
|
276
|
Other |
9,939 |
9,818 |
|
5,082 |
|
8,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
non-interest expense |
42,407 |
40,809 |
|
20,368 |
|
35,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income taxes |
73,671 |
82,077 |
|
37,468 |
|
61,503
|
Income
tax expense |
27,449 |
30,801 |
|
14,008 |
|
22,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income |
$46,222 |
$51,276 |
|
$23,460 |
|
$38,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$1.31 |
$1.43 |
|
$0.65 |
|
$1.08
|
Diluted |
$1.28 |
$1.37 |
|
$0.62 |
|
$1.03
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31 |
|
Six
Months
Ended
December
31, |
|
Fiscal
Year
Ended
June
30 |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock (Par Value $0.01): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
$492 |
$479 |
|
$473 |
|
$458
|
Shares
issued in exercise of options |
9 |
13 |
|
6 |
|
15 |
Balance
at end of period |
501 |
492 |
|
479 |
|
473 |
Additional
Paid-in Capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
185,991 |
172,301 |
|
162,004 |
|
151,081
|
Cash
paid for fractional shares and adjustment from cash
dividend |
(12) |
(2) |
|
(2) |
|
(17) |
Stock
options exercised |
4,007 |
5,316 |
|
2,439 |
|
6,689 |
Release
of treasury stock for shares acquired by BMP |
742 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Tax
benefit of RRP shares and stock options exercised |
5,212 |
6,382 |
|
6,977 |
|
2,822 |
Amortization
of excess fair value over cost - ESOP stock |
2,243 |
1,998 |
|
882 |
|
1,429
|
Balance
at end of period |
198,183 |
185,991 |
|
172,300 |
|
162,004
|
Retained
earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
231,771 |
196,309 |
|
179,060 |
|
150,264
|
Net
income for the period |
46,222 |
51,276 |
|
23,460 |
|
38,677
|
Cash
dividends declared and paid |
(19,756) |
(15,814) |
|
(6,211) |
|
(9,881) |
Balance
at end of period |
258,237 |
231,771 |
|
196,309 |
|
179,060
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
(846) |
2,076 |
|
2,166 |
|
4,030
|
Change
in other comprehensive (loss) income during the
period, net of deferred taxes |
(2,382) |
(2,922) |
|
(90) |
|
(1,864) |
Balance
at end of period |
(3,228) |
(846) |
|
2,076 |
|
2,166
|
Employee
Stock Ownership Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
(5,202) |
(5,661) |
|
(5,895) |
|
(6,365) |
Amortization
of earned portion of ESOP stock |
453 |
459 |
|
234 |
|
470
|
Balance
at end of period |
(4,749) |
(5,202) |
|
(5,661) |
|
(5,895) |
Recognition
and Retention Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
(2,617) |
(2,641) |
|
(2,711) |
|
(2,899) |
Common
stock acquired by RRP |
(103) |
(84) |
|
(73) |
|
(964) |
Amortization
of earned portion of RRP stock |
108 |
108 |
|
143 |
|
1,152
|
Balance
at end of period |
(2,612) |
(2,617) |
|
(2,641) |
|
(2,711) |
Common
Stock Held by BMP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
(5,584) |
(3,867) |
|
(3,867) |
|
(2,659) |
Common
stock acquired |
(1,764) |
(1,717) |
|
- |
|
(1,208) |
Balance
at end of period |
(7,348) |
(5,584) |
|
(3,867) |
|
(3,867) |
Treasury
Stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
(120,086) |
(93,258) |
|
(81,489) |
|
(66,799) |
Release
of treasury stock for shares acquired by BMP |
1,021 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Purchase
of treasury shares, at cost |
(38,198) |
(26,828) |
|
(11,769) |
|
(14,690) |
Balance
at end of period |
(157,263) |
(120,086) |
|
(93,258) |
|
(81,489) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income |
$46,222 |
$51,276 |
|
$23,460 |
|
$38,677
|
Minimum
pension liability, net of (tax) benefit of $(1,604) during the six months
ended December 31, 2002 and $1,604 during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2002 |
- |
- |
|
1,908 |
|
(1,908) |
Reclassification
adjustment for securities sold, net of (taxes) benefit of $(173)
and
$799 during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, $8
during the six
months ended December 31, 2002 and $(929) during the year ended
June 30, 2002 |
(203) |
937 |
|
10 |
|
(1,090)
|
Net
unrealized securities (losses) gains arising during the period, net of
benefit (taxes) of $1,856 and $3,288 during the years ended December 31,
2004
and 2003, respectively, $1,710 during the six months ended December 31,
2002, and $(965)
during the year ended June 30, 2002 |
(2,179) |
(3,859) |
|
(2,008) |
|
1,134
|
Comprehensive
Income |
$43,480 |
$48,354 |
|
$23,370 |
|
$36,813
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months
Ended
December
31, |
|
Fiscal
Year
Ended
June
30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
(Dollars
In thousands) |
Net
Income |
$46,222
|
$51,276
|
|
$23,460
|
|
$38,677
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
gain on investment and mortgage backed securities called |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
(11)
|
Net
(gain) loss on investment and mortgage backed securities
sold |
(377) |
1,736 |
|
18 |
|
(2,018) |
Net
gain on sale of loans held for sale |
(336) |
(1,594) |
|
(2,033) |
|
(20) |
Net
loss (gain) on sales and disposals of other assets |
- |
161 |
|
3 |
|
(117) |
Net
depreciation and amortization |
4,411 |
5,408 |
|
1,832 |
|
1,556 |
ESOP
and RRP compensation expense |
2,645
|
2,565
|
|
1,259
|
|
3,051
|
Provision
for loan losses |
280
|
288
|
|
120
|
|
240
|
Originations
of loans sold during the period |
(170,564) |
(99,987) |
|
(81,158) |
|
(2,538) |
Proceeds
from sales of loans |
167,458
|
104,117
|
|
78,800
|
|
4,325
|
Decrease
(Increase) in cash surrender value of Bank Owned Life
Insurance |
2,043 |
(2,118) |
|
(1,122) |
|
(2,201) |
(Increase)
Decrease in net deferred income tax asset |
(4,444) |
(8,669) |
|
(5,927) |
|
(431) |
(Increase)
Decrease in other assets and other real estate owned |
(8,461) |
19,201 |
|
(5,596) |
|
2,797 |
(Decrease)
Increase in other liabilities |
(6,485) |
(6,795) |
|
6,216 |
|
3,748 |
Net
cash provided by Operating Activities |
32,392 |
65,589 |
|
15,872 |
|
47,058 |
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(increase) decrease in federal funds sold and short-term
investments |
(8,005) |
18,769 |
|
(37,796)
|
|
(39,855)
|
Proceeds
from maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity |
125
|
115
|
|
50
|
|
755
|
Proceeds
from maturities of investment securities
available-for-sale |
5,000
|
49,746
|
|
8,875
|
|
7,045
|
Proceeds
from calls of investment securities held-to-maturity |
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2,155
|
Proceeds
from calls of investment securities available-for-sale |
- |
18,000
|
|
32,030
|
|
25,211
|
Proceeds
from sales of investment securities available-for-sale |
7,959 |
-
|
|
988
|
|
8,589
|
Proceeds
from sales and calls of mortgage backed securities
available-for-sale |
127,107 |
55,904 |
|
- |
|
5,005 |
Purchases
of investment securities available-for-sale |
(30,074) |
(292) |
|
(9,281) |
|
(87,082) |
Purchases
of mortgage backed securities available-for-sale |
(398,210) |
(531,029) |
|
(224,579) |
|
(42,218) |
Principal
collected on mortgage backed securities held-to-maturity |
305 |
1,479 |
|
1,026 |
|
4,885 |
Principal
collected on mortgage backed securities available-for-sale |
206,150
|
362,729
|
|
148,530
|
|
179,950
|
Net
increase in loans |
(305,479) |
(25,827) |
|
(45,464) |
|
(161,989) |
Purchases
of fixed assets, net |
(1,742) |
(1,950) |
|
(1,323) |
|
(1,593) |
Sale
(purchase) of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York capital stock
|
1,375 |
8,190 |
|
(525) |
|
10,017 |
Net
cash used in Investing Activities |
(395,489) |
(44,166) |
|
(127,469) |
|
(89,125) |
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in due to depositors |
168,371 |
114,503 |
|
147,141 |
|
351,602 |
Net
increase (decrease) in escrow and other deposits |
8,342 |
3,263 |
|
(9,028) |
|
5,746 |
Increase
(Decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
192,909
|
(82,866)
|
|
(2,176)
|
|
(330,071)
|
(Repayments
of) Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank of New York
advances |
(27,500) |
(21,000) |
|
(20,000) |
|
32,500 |
Proceeds
from Trust Preferred borrowings |
72,165 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Common
stock issued for exercise of stock options and tax benefits of
RRP |
9,388 |
11,706 |
|
9,420 |
|
9,511 |
Purchase
of common stock by the RRP and BMP |
(103) |
(1,801) |
|
(73) |
|
(2,172) |
Cash
dividends paid to stockholders and cash disbursed in payment of stock
dividends |
(19,769) |
(15,814) |
|
(6,211) |
|
(9,898) |
Purchase
of treasury stock |
(38,198) |
(26,828) |
|
(11,769) |
|
(14,690) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) Financing Activities |
365,605 |
(18,837) |
|
107,304 |
|
42,528 |
INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS |
2,508 |
2,586 |
|
(4,293) |
|
461 |
CASH
AND DUE FROM BANKS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
24,073
|
21,487
|
|
25,780
|
|
25,319
|
CASH
AND DUE FROM BANKS, END OF PERIOD |
$26,581
|
$24,073
|
|
$21,487
|
|
$25,780
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for income taxes |
$32,239
|
$28,907
|
|
$5,216
|
|
$16,748
|
Cash
paid for interest |
$66,629
|
$71,843
|
|
$44,893
|
|
$104,606
|
Transfer
of loans to other real estate owned |
$ -
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$134
|
Change
in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
$(2,382) |
$(2,922) |
|
$(90) |
|
$(1,864) |
Change
in minimum pension liability, net of deferred taxes |
$- |
$- |
|
$1,908 |
|
$(1,908) |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars
In thousands except for share amounts)
1.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Nature
of Operations - Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. (the "Holding Company" and together with its direct
and indirect subsidiaries, the "Company" or "DCB") is a Delaware corporation
organized by The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh (the "Bank") for the purpose
of acquiring all of the capital stock of the Bank issued in the Bank's
conversion to stock ownership on June 26, 1996. Presently, the significant
assets of the Holding Company are the capital stock of the Bank, the Holding
Company's loan to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan of Dime Community
Bancshares, Inc. and Affiliates ("ESOP"), investments retained by the Holding
Company, and an investment real estate property owned by the Holding Company's
wholly-owned subsidiary, 842 Manhattan Avenue Corporation. The liabilities of
the Holding Company are composed primarily of a $25.0 million subordinated note
payable maturing in May 2010 and $72.2 million of trust preferred securities
payable maturing in 2034. The Company is subject to the financial reporting
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The Bank
was originally founded in 1864 as a New York State-chartered mutual savings
bank. In November 1995, the Bank converted to a federally chartered stock
savings bank. The Bank has been, and intends to remain, a community-oriented
financial institution providing financial services and loans for housing within
its market areas. The Bank maintains its headquarters in the Williamsburg
section of the borough of Brooklyn, New York. The Bank has twenty retail banking
offices located throughout the boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx, and
in Nassau County in New York.
Change
in Fiscal Year End - On
July 18, 2002, the Boards of Directors of the Holding Company and each of its
direct and indirect subsidiaries other than DSBW Preferred Funding Corporation
and DSBW Residential Preferred Funding Corporation, approved changes in the
fiscal year end of each company from June 30th to
December 31st.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies - The
accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The
following is a description of the significant policies.
Stock
Dividends - All
capital accounts, share and per share data included in the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto have been retroactively adjusted to
reflect the 50% common stock dividends paid on August 21, 2001, April 24, 2002
and March 16, 2004.
Principles
of Consolidation - The
accompanying 2004, 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Holding Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Bank and
842 Manhattan Avenue Corporation. 842 Manhattan Avenue Corporation owns and
manages a real estate property which housed a former branch office of Financial
Federal Savings Bank, F.S.B. ("FFSB"), a subsidiary of Financial Bancorp, Inc.
("FIBC"), which the Holding Company acquired on January 21, 1999. All financial
statements presented also include the accounts of the Bank's fiver wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Havemeyer Equities Corp. (''HEC''), Boulevard Funding Corp.
(''BFC''), Havemeyer Investments, Inc., DSBW Residential Preferred Funding Corp.
("DRPFC") and Dime Reinvestment Company ("DRC"). DRPFC, established in March,
1998, invests in real estate loans and is intended to qualify as a real estate
investment trust for federal tax purposes. BFC was established in order to
invest in real estate joint ventures and other real estate assets. BFC had no
investments in real estate at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and is currently
inactive. HEC was also originally established in order to invest in real estate
joint ventures and other real estate assets. In June, 1998, HEC assumed direct
ownership of DSBW Preferred Funding Corp. ("DPFC"). DPFC, established as a
direct subsidiary of the Bank in March, 1998, invests in real estate loans and
is intended to qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal tax
purposes. DRC was established in i2004 in order to function as a Qualified
Community Development Entity as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. DRC is currently inactive. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Investment
Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities -
Purchases and sales of investment and mortgage-backed securities are recorded on
trade date. Gains and losses on sales of investment and mortgage-backed
securities are recorded on the specific identification basis.
Debt and
equity securities that have readily determinable fair values are carried at fair
value unless they are held-to-maturity. Debt securities are classified as
held-to-maturity and carried at amortized cost only if the Company has a
positive intent and ability to hold them to maturity. If not classified as
held-to-maturity, such securities are classified as securities
available-for-sale or as trading securities. Unrealized holding gains or losses
on securities available-for-sale are excluded from net income and reported net
of income taxes as other comprehensive income. At December 31, 2004 and 2003,
all equity securities were classified as available-for-sale.
Neither
the Holding Company nor the Bank has acquired securities for the purpose of
engaging in trading activities.
The
Company conducts a periodic review and evaluation of its securities portfolio
taking into account the severity, duration and intent with regard to the
securities in order to determine if the decline in market value of any security
below its amortized cost basis is other than temporary. If such decline is
deemed other than temporary, the carrying amount of the security is adjusted
through a valuation allowance.
Loans
Held for Sale - Mortgage
loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at
the lower of aggregate cost or estimated fair value. Loans sold are generally
sold with servicing rights retained.
Allowance
for Loan Losses - The
Company provides a valuation allowance for estimated losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. The valuation allowance for estimated losses on loans is based on the
Bank's past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio,
existing adverse situations which may affect the borrower's ability to repay,
estimated value of underlying collateral and current economic conditions in the
Bank's lending area. The allowance is increased by provisions for loan losses
charged to operations and is reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. While
management uses available information to estimate losses on loans, future
additions to, or reductions in, the allowance may be necessary based on changes
in economic conditions beyond management's control. In addition, various
regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,
periodically review the Bank's allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may
require the Bank to recognize additions to, or reductions in, the allowance
based on judgments different from those of management. Management believes,
based upon all relevant and available information, that the allowance for loan
losses is appropriate to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio.
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 114, ''Accounting by Creditors
for Impairment of a Loan,'' as amended by SFAS 118, "Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan - Income Recognition and Disclosures, an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 114," ("Amended SFAS 114"), requires all creditors to account for
impaired loans, except those loans that are accounted for at fair value or at
the lower of cost or fair value, at the present value of expected future cash
flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. As an expedient,
creditors may account for impaired loans at the fair value of the collateral or
at the observable market price of the loan if one exists. If the estimated fair
value of an impaired loan is less than the recorded amount, a specific valuation
allowance is established. If the impairment is considered to be permanent, a
write-down is charged against the allowance for loan losses. In accordance with
Amended SFAS 114, homogeneous loans are not required to be individually
considered for impairment. The Company considers individual one- to four-family
residential mortgage loans and cooperative apartment loans having a balance of
less than $334 and all consumer loans to be small balance homogenous loan pools
and, accordingly, are not covered by Amended SFAS 114.
A reserve
is also recorded related to multifamily loans sold with recourse under an
agreement with the Federal National Mortgage Agency ("FNMA"). This reserve,
which is included in other liabilities, is determined in a similar manner to the
Company's allowance for loan losses related to loans held in
portfolio.
Loans
- - Loans are
reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income and the
allowance for loan losses. Interest income on loans is recorded using the level
yield method. Under this method, discount accretion and premium amortization are
included in interest income. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan
origination costs are deferred and amortized as a yield adjustment over the
contractual loan terms.
Accrual
of interest is discontinued when its receipt is in doubt, which typically occurs
when a loan becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest. Any interest
accrued to income in the year that interest accruals are discontinued is
reversed. Payments on nonaccrual loans are generally applied to principal.
Management may elect to continue the accrual of interest when a loan is in the
process of collection and the estimated fair value of collateral is sufficient
to cover the principal balance (including any outstanding advances made related
to the loan) and accrued interest. Loans are returned to accrual status once the
doubt concerning collectibility has been removed and the borrower has
demonstrated performance in accordance with the loan terms and conditions for a
period of at least three months.
Mortgage
Servicing Rights - The cost
of mortgage loans sold with servicing rights retained is allocated between the
loans and the servicing rights based on their estimated fair values at the time
of loan sale. Servicing assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value
and are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, net servicing
income. The estimated fair value of loan servicing assets is determined by
calculating the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows,
using assumptions of prepayments, defaults, servicing costs and discount rates
that the Company believes market participants would use for similar assets.
Capitalized loan servicing assets are stratified based on predominant risk
characteristics of the underlying loans for the purpose of evaluating
impairment. A valuation allowance is then established in the event the recorded
value of an individual stratum exceeds fair value. A third party valuation of
the loan servicing asset was performed as of both December 31, 2004 and 2003,
and will be performed on an ongoing basis at least quarterly.
Other
Real Estate Owned, Net -
Properties acquired as a result of foreclosure on a mortgage loan are classified
as other real estate owned ("OREO") and are recorded at the lower of the
recorded investment in the related loan or the fair value of the property at the
date of acquisition, with any resulting write down charged to the allowance for
loan losses and any disposition expenses charged to the valuation allowance for
possible losses on OREO. Subsequent write downs are charged directly to
operating expenses. The Company had no OREO properties as of December 31, 2004
and 2003.
Premises
and Fixed Assets, Net - Land
is stated at original cost. Buildings and furniture, fixtures and equipment are
stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed by the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the properties as
follows:
Buildings
|
|
2.22%
to 2.50% per year |
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment |
|
10%
per year |
Computer
equipment |
|
33.33%
per year |
Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the
related leases.
Earnings
Per Share ("EPS")
- EPS are
calculated and reported in accordance with SFAS 128, "Earnings Per Share.'' SFAS
128 requires disclosure of basic earnings per share and diluted EPS for entities
with complex capital structures on the face of the income statement, along with
a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic and diluted EPS.
Basic EPS
is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares
outstanding during the year (weighted average common shares are adjusted to
include vested RRP shares and allocated ESOP shares). Diluted EPS is computed
using the same method as basic EPS, but reflects the potential dilution that
would occur if unvested RRP shares became vested and if stock options were
exercised and converted into common stock.
The
following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of basic EPS and
diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six-month period
ended December 31, 2002, and the year ended June 30, 2002:
|
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, |
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
June
30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income per the Consolidated Statement of
Operations |
$46,222 |
$51,276 |
|
$23,460 |
|
$38,677 |
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
shares outstanding utilized in the
calculation
of basic EPS |
35,318,858 |
35,922,777 |
|
36,287,111 |
|
35,865,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
shares of RRP |
29,766 |
44,754 |
|
64,564 |
|
211,156 |
Common
stock equivalents resulting from the
dilutive effect of "in-the-money" stock options |
863,376 |
1,382,726 |
|
1,512,513 |
|
1,493,262 |
Average
shares outstanding utilized in the
calculation
of diluted EPS |
36,212,000 |
37,350,257 |
|
37,864,188 |
|
37,569,453 |
Common
stock equivalents resulting from the dilutive effect of "in-the-money" stock
options are calculated based upon the excess of the average market value of the
Company's common stock over the exercise price of outstanding options.
Accounting
for Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangible -SFAS 142
"Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," established new standards for goodwill
acquired in a business combination. SFAS 142 eliminated amortization of goodwill
and instead required the performance of a transitional goodwill impairment test
six months from the date of adoption and at least annually thereafter. As of the
date of adoption of SFAS 142, the Company had goodwill totaling $55.6 million.
Prior to adoption of SFAS 142, annual goodwill amortization expense totaled $4.6
million.
Prior to
December 31, 2001, the Company completed the transitional impairment test for
goodwill as of July 1, 2001, and concluded that no potential impairment existed.
The Company subsequently designated the last day of its fiscal year as its
annual date for impairment testing, and completed a second impairment test as of
June 30, 2002. This test also concluded that no potential impairment of goodwill
existed. Due to its change in fiscal year end, the Company performed another
impairment test as of December 31, 2002, and subsequently has
performed
impairment tests as of both December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004. In each
instance, the Company concluded that no potential impairment of goodwill
existed. No events have occurred or circumstances have changed subsequent to
December 31, 2004 that would reduce the fair value of the Company's reporting
unit below its carrying value. Such events or changes in circumstances would
require an immediate impairment test to be performed in accordance with SFAS
142.
There was
no amortization expense recorded related to goodwill during the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six months ended December 31, 2002 and the year
ended June 30, 2002.
Changes
in the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets for all the
periods presented are as follows:
Goodwill: |
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Original
Amount |
$73,107 |
$73,107 |
|
$73,107 |
|
$73,107 |
Accumulated
Amortization |
(17,469) |
(17,469) |
|
(17,469) |
|
(17,469) |
Net
Carrying Value |
$55,638 |
$55,638 |
|
$55,638 |
|
$55,638 |
Core
Deposit Intangible: |
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31 |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Original
Amount |
$4,950 |
$4,950 |
|
$4,950 |
|
$4,950 |
Accumulated
Amortization |
(4,902) |
(4,077) |
|
(3,252) |
|
(2,840) |
Net
Carrying Value |
$48 |
$873 |
|
$1,698 |
|
$2,110 |
In
conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 142, the Company also re-assessed the
useful lives and classification of its identifiable intangible assets and
determined that they remained appropriate. Aggregate amortization expense
related to the core deposit intangible was $825 for the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, $412 for the six-month period ended December 31,
2002, and $825 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 . Estimated future
amortization expense related to the core deposit intangible is as
follows:
For
the Fiscal Year Ending December 31: |
|
2005 |
48 |
|
$48 |
Income
Taxes -
Income
taxes are accounted for in accordance with SFAS 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes," which requires that deferred taxes be provided for temporary differences
between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities.
Cash
Flows - For
purposes of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers cash
and due from banks to be cash equivalents.
Employee
Benefits - The Bank
maintains the Retirement Plan of The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh
("Employee Retirement Plan") and The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh 401(k)
Plan ["401(k) Plan"] for substantially all of its employees, both of which are
tax qualified under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
"Code").
The Bank
also maintains the Postretirement Welfare Plan of The Dime Savings Bank of
Williamsburgh (the "Postretirement Benefit Plan."), providing additional
postretirement benefits to employees that are recorded in accordance with SFAS
106, ''Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions.''
SFAS 106 requires accrual of postretirement benefits (such as health care
benefits) during the years an employee provides services.
The
Holding Company and Bank maintain an ESOP. Compensation expense related to the
ESOP is recorded in accordance with Statement of Position 93-6, which requires
the compensation expense to be recorded during the period in which the shares
become committed to be released to participants. The compensation expense is
measured based upon the fair market value of the stock during the period, and,
to the extent that the fair value of the shares committed to be released differs
from the original cost of such shares, the difference is recorded as an
adjustment to additional paid-in capital.
The
Holding Company and Bank maintain the Recognition
and Retention Plan for Outside Directors, Officers and Employees of Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. ("RRP"),
the Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors,
Officers and Employees (the "1996 Stock Option Plan"), the Dime Community
Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors, Officers and
Employees (the "2001 Stock Option Plan") and the Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. 2004
Stock Incentive Plan for Outside Directors, Officers and Employees (the "2004
Stock Incentive Plan," and collectively the "Stock Plans"); which are discussed
more fully in Note 15 and which are
subject to the accounting requirements of SFAS 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation," as amended by SFAS 148 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -
Transition and Disclosures, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123"
(collectively "SFAS 123"). SFAS 123 encourages, but does not require, companies
to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair
value. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the Stock Plans
using the intrinsic value recognition and measurement principles of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees"
("APB 25"), and related interpretations. Accordingly, no stock-based
compensation cost has been reflected in net income for stock options, since, for
all options granted under the Stock Plans, the market value of the underlying
common stock on the date of grant equals the exercise price of the common stock.
In
accordance with APB 25, compensation expense related to the RRP is recorded for
all shares earned by participants during the period at the average historical
acquisition cost of all allocated RRP shares.
The
following table illustrates the effect on net income and EPS if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based
employee compensation for the Stock Plans and RRP shares:
|
Fiscal
Year
Ended
December 31, |
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
June
30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Net
income, as reported |
$46,222 |
$51,276 |
|
$23,460 |
|
$38,677 |
Less:
Excess stock-based compensation expense determined under
the fair value method over the stock-based compensation recorded
for all plans, net of applicable taxes |
(1,603) |
(1,453) |
|
(560) |
|
(745) |
Pro
forma net income |
$44,619 |
$49,823 |
|
$22,900 |
|
$37,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic,
as reported |
$1.31 |
$1.43 |
|
$0.65 |
|
$1.08 |
Basic,
pro forma |
1.26 |
1.39 |
|
0.63 |
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted,
as reported |
1.28 |
$1.37 |
|
$0.62 |
|
$1.03 |
Diluted,
pro forma |
1.23 |
1.33 |
|
0.61 |
|
1.01 |
The
assumptions used to calculate the fair value of options granted are evaluated
and revised, as necessary, to reflect market conditions and the Company’s
experience. See Note 15 for further details.
In
December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No.
123 (revised 2004), "Share-Based Payment", ("SFAS 123R"), that addresses the
accounting for share-based payment transactions (e.g., stock
options and awards of restricted stock) in which an employer receives employee
services in exchange for equity securities of the company or liabilities that
are based on the fair value of the company’s equity securities. The proposed
statement, if adopted as proposed, would eliminate APB 25 and would generally
require that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method
and the recording of compensation expense rather than optional pro forma
disclosure. Adoption of SFAS 123R is required for quarterly periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. Management of the Company is still evaluating the impact of
adoption of SFAS 123R upon its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
Derivative
Instruments - In
June, 1998, the FASB issued SFAS 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities" as amended in June 1999 by SFAS 137, "Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - Deferral of the Effective Date
of FASB Statement No. 133," and in June 2000 by SFAS 138, "Accounting for
Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities" (collectively
"SFAS 133"). SFAS 133 requires that entities recognize all derivatives as either
assets or liabilities in the statement of financial condition and measure those
instruments at fair value. Under SFAS 133, an entity may designate a derivative
as a hedge of exposure to changes in either: (a) the fair value of a recognized
asset, liability or firm commitment, (b) cash flows of a recognized or
forecasted transaction, or (c) foreign currencies of a net investment in foreign
operations, firm commitments, available-for-sale securities or a forecasted
transaction. Depending upon the effectiveness of the hedge and/or the
transaction being hedged, any fluctuations in the fair value of the derivative
instrument are either recognized in earnings in the current year, deferred to
future periods, or recognized in other comprehensive income. Changes in the fair
value of all derivative instruments not receiving hedge accounting recognition
are recorded in current year earnings.
In April
2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities." This statement amended SFAS 133 to provide
clarification on the financial accounting and reporting of derivative
instruments and hedging activities and requires contracts with similar
characteristics to be accounted for on a comparable basis.
During
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six month period ended December
31, 2002 and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, neither the Holding Company
nor the Bank held any derivative instruments or any embedded derivative
instruments that required bifurcation.
Comprehensive
Income -
Comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, six months
ended December 31, 2002, and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 was determined
in accordance with SFAS 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income.'' Comprehensive
income includes revenues, expenses, minimum pension liability and gains and
losses which, under GAAP, bypass net income and are typically reported as a
component of stockholders' equity.
Disclosures
About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information - The
Company's consolidated financial statements reflect the adoption of SFAS 131,
"Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." SFAS 131
establishes standards for the manner in which public business enterprises report
information about operating segments in annual financial statements, requires
that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments and
establishes standards for related disclosure about products and services,
geographic areas, and major customers.
The
Company has one reportable segment, "Community Banking." All of the Company's
activities are interrelated, and each activity is dependent and assessed based
on how each of the activities of the Company supports the others. For example,
lending (exclusive of one-to four-family residential lending) is dependent upon
the ability of the Bank to fund itself with retail deposits and other borrowings
and to manage interest rate and credit risk. This situation is also similar for
consumer and one-to four-family residential mortgage lending. Accordingly, all
significant operating decisions are based upon analysis of the Company as one
operating segment or unit. The Chief Executive officer is considered the chief
decision maker for this reportable segment.
For the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, six months ended December 31, 2002, and
the year ended June 30, 2002, there was no customer that accounted for more than
10% of the Company's consolidated revenue.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In March
2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a consensus on Issue No.
03-1, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments" ("EITF 03-1"). EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining
when an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired—including whether an
investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment until recovery. In
addition, EITF 03-1 contains disclosure requirements regarding impairments that
have not been recognized as other than temporary. Except as discussed in the
following paragraph, the guidance for evaluating whether an investment is
other-than-temporarily impaired was to be applied in other-than-temporary
impairment evaluations made in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004.
The disclosures were effective in annual financial statements for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2003 for investments accounted for under SFAS 115,
"Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." For all
other investments within the scope of this Issue, the disclosures are effective
in annual financial statements for fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The
additional disclosures for cost method investments are effective for fiscal
years ending after June 15, 2004. Comparative information for periods prior to
initial application is not required.
In
October 2004, the FASB issued proposed staff position EITF Issue 03-1-a,
"Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF Issue No.
03-1, 'The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments.'" This proposed staff position is expected to provide
implementation guidance with respect to debt securities that are impaired solely
due to interest rates and/or sector spreads and analyzed for
other-than-temporary impairment under paragraph 16 of EITF 03-1. As a result of
the proposed position statement, the FASB has indefinitely delayed the effective
date for the measurement and recognition guidance contained in paragraphs 10
through 20 of EITF 03-1. Additionally, the FASB issued proposed staff position
EITF Issue No. 03-1-1, which indefinitely delayed the effective date of
measurement and recognition guidance contained in paragraphs 10 through 20 of
EITF 03-1. Management will evaluate the impact of adopting the application of
the guidance for evaluating an other-than-temporary impairment upon issuance of
the guidance.
In
November 2004, the EITF issued EITF No. 04-5, "Investors' Accounting for an
Investment in a Limited Partnership When the Investor is the Sole General
Partner and the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights" ("EITF 04-5"). EITF 04-5
provides a framework for addressing the question of when a sole general partner,
as defined in EITF 04-5, should consolidate a limited partner. In response to
EITF 04-5, the FASB issued Statement of Position 78-9-a ("SOP 78-9-a"), which
will amend Statement of Position 78-9, "Accounting for Investments in Real
Estate Ventures" ("SOP 78-9"), in order to provide consistency between
participation rights and consolidation of partnership interests defined in SOP
78-9 and EITF 04-5. Management does not expect that the adoption of either EITF
04-5 or SOP 78-9-a will have a material impact upon the Company's consolidated
statement of financial condition or results of operations .
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 152, "Accounting for Real Estate
Time-Sharing Transactions - an amendement of FASB Statements No. 66 and 67,"
("SFAS 152"). SFAS 152 amends SFAS 66 to reference the financial accounting and
reporting guidance for real estate time-sharing transactions that is provided in
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants ("AICPA") Statement of
Position 04-2, "Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing Transactions" ("SOP
04-2"). SFAS 152 also amends SFAS 67 to state that the guidance for both
incidental operations and the costs incurred to sell the real estate projects
does not apply to real estate time-sharing transactions. Under SFAS 152,
guidance for operations and costs associated with time-sharing transactions will
be provided by SOP 04-2. The provisions of SFAS 152 are effective for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 152 is not
expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of
financial condition or results of operations.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153 "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets- an
amendment of APB Opinion No. 29," ("SFAS 153"). SFAS 153 amends APB Opinion No.
29 by eliminating the specific exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets, and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. Under SFAS 153, a
nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the
entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The
provisions of SFAS 153 are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring
in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Early application is permitted
for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after
December 16, 2004. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 is not expected to have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition
or results of operations .
Use
of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements - The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Areas in the accompanying financial statements where estimates are significant
include the allowance for loans losses, MSR, asset impairment adjustments
related to the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets and other than
temporary impairments of securities, loan income recognition, the fair value of
financial instruments, and the determination of actuarial benefit obligations
associated with defined benefit plans sponsored by the Company.
Reclassification -
Certain amounts as of December 31, 2003 and for the six months ended December
31, 2002 and the year ended June 30, 2002 have been reclassified to conform to
their presentation as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.
2.
CONVERSION TO STOCK FORM OF OWNERSHIP
On
November 2, 1995, the Board of Directors of the Bank adopted a Plan of
Conversion to convert from mutual to stock form of ownership. At the time of
conversion, the Bank established a liquidation account in an amount equal to the
retained earnings of the Bank as of the date of the most recent financial
statements contained in the final conversion
prospectus.
The liquidation account is reduced annually to the extent that eligible account
holders have reduced their qualifying deposits as of each anniversary date.
Subsequent increases in deposits will not restore an eligible account holder's
interest in the liquidation account. In the event of a complete liquidation,
each eligible account holder will be entitled to receive a distribution from the
liquidation account in an amount proportionate to the current adjusted
qualifying balances for accounts then held.
The
Holding Company acquired Conestoga on June 26, 1996. The liquidation account
previously established by Conestoga's subsidiary, Pioneer Savings Bank, F.S.B.,
during its initial public offering in March 1993, was assumed by the Company in
the acquisition.
The
Holding Company acquired FIBC on January 21, 1999. The liquidation account
previously established by FIBC's subsidiary, FFSB, during its initial public
offering, was assumed by the Company in the acquisition.
The
Company may not declare or pay cash dividends on or repurchase any of its shares
of common stock if the effect thereof would cause stockholders' equity to be
reduced below applicable regulatory capital maintenance requirements, the amount
required for the liquidation account, or if such declaration and payment would
otherwise violate regulatory requirements.
As of
December 31, 2004, under applicable regulations of the Office of Thrift
Supervision ("OTS"), the Bank is eligible to distribute up to $36,794 of
dividends to the Holding Company without receiving written approval from the
OTS.
3.
INVESTMENT SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY AND
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
The
amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of
investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2004 were as
follows:
|
Investment
Securities Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized
Gains |
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses) |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
Debt
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
Obligations
of state and political
subdivisions, maturities of one-to-five years |
$585 |
$4 |
- |
$589 |
The
amortized/historical cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair
value of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2004 were as
follows:
|
Investment
Securities Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
Amortized/
Historical
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized
Gains |
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses) |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
Debt
securities: |
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
corporations and agencies |
$12,999 |
$- |
$(43) |
$12,956 |
Corporate
securities |
36,487 |
102 |
(635) |
35,954 |
Total
debt securities |
49,486 |
102 |
(678) |
48,910 |
Equity
securities |
5,071 |
1,005 |
(146) |
5,930 |
|
$54,557 |
$1,107 |
$(824) |
$54,840 |
The
amortized cost and estimated fair value of the debt securities component of
investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2004, by contractual
maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with
or without call or prepayment fees.
|
Amortized
Cost |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
Due
in one year or less |
$11,036 |
$10,993 |
Due
after one year through five years |
3,997 |
3,982 |
Due
after five years through ten years |
1,000 |
1,025 |
Due
after ten years |
33,453 |
32,910 |
|
$49,486 |
$48,910 |
The
following summarizes the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by
investment category and the length of time that these securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position, of investment securities available-for-sale
as of December 31, 2004:
|
Less
than 12
Months
Consecutive
Unrealized
Losses |
12
Months or More
Consecutive
Unrealized
Losses |
Total |
|
Fair
Value |
Unrealized
Losses |
Fair
Value |
Unrealized
Loss |
Fair
Value |
Unrealized
Losses |
Debt
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
corporations and agencies |
$12,956 |
$43 |
- |
- |
$12,956 |
$43 |
Corporate
securities |
21,558 |
486 |
$2,823 |
$149 |
24,381 |
635 |
Equity
securities |
2,832 |
146 |
- |
- |
2,832 |
146 |
|
$37,346 |
$675 |
$2,823 |
$149 |
$40,169 |
$824 |
Management
does not believe that any of the unrealized losses that have existed for 12
consecutive months or more as shown in the above table qualified as other-than
temporary losses at December 31, 2004. In making this determination, management
considered the severity and duration of the loss, as well as management's intent
to hold the security until the loss is recovered. Management also has no current
intention to dispose of these investments.
During
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, proceeds from the sales of investment
securities available-for-sale totaled $7,959. A net gain of $259 was recorded on
these sales.
The
amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of
investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2003 were as
follows:
|
Investment
Securities Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized
Gains |
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses) |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
Debt
Securities: |
|
|
|
|
Obligations
of state and political
subdivisions, maturities of one-to-five years |
$710 |
$8 |
- |
$718 |
The
amortized/historical cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair
value of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2003 were as
follows:
|
Investment
Securities Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
Amortized/
Historical
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized
Gains |
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses) |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
Debt
securities: |
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
corporations and agencies |
$5,011 |
$15 |
- |
$5,026 |
Corporate
securities |
22,093 |
206 |
$(348) |
21,951 |
Total
debt securities |
27,104 |
221 |
(348) |
26,977 |
Equity
securities |
9,639 |
623 |
(132) |
10,130 |
|
$36,743 |
$844 |
$(480) |
$37,107 |
The
amortized cost and estimated fair value of the debt securities component of
investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2003, by contractual
maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with
or without call or prepayment fees.
|
Amortized
Cost |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
Due
in one year or less |
$5,011 |
$5,026 |
Due
after one year through five years |
- |
- |
Due
after five years through ten years |
2,000 |
2,110 |
Due
after ten years |
20,093 |
19,841 |
|
$27,104 |
$26,977 |
The
following summarizes the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by
investment category and the length of time that these securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position, of investment securities available-for-sale
as of December 31, 2003:
|
Less
than 12
Months
Consecutive
Unrealized
Losses |
12
Months or More
Consecutive
Unrealized
Losses |
Total |
|
Fair
Value |
Unrealized
Losses |
Fair
Value |
Unrealized
Loss |
Fair
Value |
Unrealized
Losses |
Debt
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
securities |
1,990 |
$10 |
$6,595 |
$338 |
$8,585 |
$348 |
Equity
securities |
- |
- |
2,693 |
132 |
2,693 |
132 |
|
$1,990 |
$10 |
$9,288 |
$470 |
$11,278 |
$480 |
Management
does not believe that any of the unrealized losses that have existed for 12
consecutive months or more as shown in the above table qualified as other-than
temporary losses at December 31, 2003. In making this determination, management
considered the severity and duration of the loss, as well as management's intent
to hold the security until the loss is recovered. Management also has no current
intention to dispose of these investments.
During
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, proceeds from the calls of investment
securities available-for-sale totaled $18,000. There was no gain or loss
recorded on these calls.
4.
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES HELD-TO-MATURITY AND
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
The
amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of
mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2004 were as
follows:
|
Mortgage-Backed
Securities Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized
Gains |
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses) |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
GNMA
pass-through certificates |
$465 |
$20 |
- |
$485 |
The
amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of
mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2004 were as
follows:
|
Mortgage-Backed
Securities Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized
Gains |
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses) |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
Collateralized
mortgage obligations |
$480,865 |
$33 |
$(6,439) |
$474,459 |
GNMA
pass-through certificates |
14,040 |
303 |
- |
14,343 |
FHLMC
pass-through certificates |
1,454 |
39 |
- |
1,493 |
FNMA
pass-through certificates |
29,250 |
95 |
(220) |
29,125 |
|
$525,609 |
$470 |
$(6,659) |
$519,420 |
Proceeds
from the sale of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale totaled $127,107
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. A gain of $118 was recorded on
these sales.
The
following summarizes the gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by
investment category and the length of time that these available-for-sale
mortgage-backed securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as
of December 31, 2004:
|
Less
than 12
Months
Consecutive
Unrealized
Losses |
12
Months or More
Consecutive
Unrealized
Losses |
Total |
|
Fair
Value |
Unrealized
Losses |
Fair
Value |
Unrealized
Loss |
Fair
Value |
Unrealized
Losses |
Debt
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations |
$359,253 |
$4,595 |
$113,371 |
$1,844 |
$472,624 |
6,439 |
FNMA
pass-through certificates |
26,430 |
220 |
- |
- |
26,430 |
220 |
|
$385,683 |
$4,815 |
$113,371 |
$1,844 |
$499,054 |
$6,659 |
Management
does not believe that any of the unrealized losses that have existed for 12
consecutive months or more as shown in the above table qualified as other-than
temporary losses at December 31, 2004. In making this determination, management
considered the severity and duration of the loss, as well as management's intent
to hold the security until the loss is recovered. Management also has no current
intention to dispose of these investments.
The
amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of
mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2003 were as
follows:
|
Mortgage-Backed
Securities Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized
Gains |
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses) |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
GNMA
pass-through certificates |
$770 |
$52 |
- |
$822 |
The
amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of
mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2003 were as
follows:
|
Mortgage-Backed
Securities Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost |
Gross
Unrealized
Gains |
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses) |
Estimated
Fair
Value |
Collateralized
mortgage obligations |
$428,847 |
$618 |
$(3,448) |
$426,017 |
GNMA
pass-through certificates |
24,164 |
596 |
- |
24,760 |
FHLMC
pass-through certificates |
7,509 |
171 |
- |
7,680 |
FNMA
pass-through certificates |
3,381 |
129 |
- |
3,510 |
|
$463,901 |
$1,514 |
$(3,448) |
$461,967 |
As of
December 31, 2003, there were collateralized mortgage obligations with a
cumulative fair value of $306,936 that had unrealized losses totaling $3,448. At
December 31, 2003, no individual available-for-sale collateralized mortgage
obligation that possessed an unrealized loss had additionally possessed
continuous unrealized losses for 12 months or more.
Proceeds
from the sale of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale totaled $55,904
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. A loss of $1,736 was recorded on
these sales.
5.
LOANS
The
Bank's real estate loans are composed of the following:
|
December
31,
2004 |
December
31,
2003 |
One-
to four-family |
$126,225 |
$124,047 |
Multifamily
residential |
1,911,956 |
1,732,854 |
Commercial
real estate |
424,060 |
309,810 |
Construction
and land acquisition |
15,558 |
2,880 |
F.H.A.
and V. A. insured mortgage loans |
4,209 |
4,646 |
Cooperative
apartment unit loans |
11,853 |
13,798 |
|
2,493,861 |
2,188,035 |
Net
unearned (fees) costs |
(463) |
(1,517) |
|
$2,493,398 |
$2,186,518 |
The Bank
originates both adjustable and fixed interest rate real estate loans. At
December 31, 2004, the approximate composition of these loans was as follows:
Fixed
Rate |
|
|
Variable
Rate |
|
Period
to Maturity |
Book
Value |
|
Earlier
Period to
Maturity
or Next Repricing |
Book
Value |
1
year or less |
$14,612 |
|
1
year or less |
$81,952 |
>
1 year-3 years |
24,283 |
|
>
1 year-3 years |
197,753 |
>
3 years-5 years |
39,839 |
|
>
3 years-5 years |
1,016,766 |
>
5 years-10 years |
240,589 |
|
>
5 years-10 years |
704,220 |
>
10 years |
170,061 |
|
>
10 years |
3,785 |
|
$489,384 |
|
|
$2,004,476 |
The
adjustable-rate loans are generally indexed to the Federal Home Loan Bank of New
York ("FHLBNY") five-year borrowing rate, or the one- or three-year constant
maturity Treasury index. The contractual terms of adjustable rate multifamily
residential and commercial real estate loans provide that their interest rate,
upon repricing, cannot fall below their rate at the time of origination. The
Bank's one- to four-family residential adjustable-rate loans are subject to
periodic and lifetime caps and floors on interest rate changes that typically
range between 200 and 650 basis points.
A
concentration of credit risk exists within the Bank's loan portfolio, as the
majority of real estate loans are collateralized by properties located in the
New York City metropolitan area.
The
Bank's other loans are composed of the following:
|
December
31,
2004 |
December
31,
2003 |
Student
loans |
$61 |
$295 |
Passbook
loans (secured by savings and
time deposits) |
1,318 |
1,429 |
Consumer
installment and other loans |
1,537 |
2,348 |
|
$2,916 |
$4,072 |
Loans on
which the accrual of interest has been discontinued were $1,459 and $525 at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Interest income foregone on nonaccrual
loans was not material during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
six months ended December 31, 2002, and the fiscal year ended June 30,
2002.
The Bank
had no loans considered troubled-debt restructurings at December 31, 2004 and
2003.
At
December 31, 2004, there were two loans totaling $830 for which impairment was
recognized under the guidance of SFAS 114. There were no loans for which
impairment was recognized under the guidance of SFAS 114 at December 31, 2003.
The average balance of impaired loans was approximately $608 during the year
ended December 31, 2004, $314 during the year ended December 31, 2003, $684
during the six months ended December 31, 2002, and $3,166 for the year ended
June 30, 2002. Write-downs on impaired loans were not material during the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six months ended December 31, 2002, and
the year ended June 30, 2002. At December 31, 2004, reserves allocated within
the allowance for loan losses for impaired loans totaled $83. There were no
reserves allocated within the allowance for loan losses for impaired loans at
December 31, 2003. During the year ended June 30, 2002, the Bank received full
repayment of principal totaling $2,924 and interest totaling $414 on an impaired
loan. Net principal and interest received on impaired loans during the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six months ended December 31, 2002 and the
year ended June 30, 2002 was not material.
The
following assumptions were utilized in evaluating the loan portfolio pursuant to
the provisions of SFAS 114:
Homogenous
Loans -
Individual one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and cooperative
apartment loans having a balance of less than $334 and all consumer loans are
considered to be small balance homogenous loan pools and, accordingly, are not
subject to the provisions of SFAS 114.
Loans
Evaluated for Impairment - All
non-homogeneous loans greater than $1,000 are individually evaluated for
potential impairment. Additionally, individual one- to four-family residential
and cooperative apartment unit mortgage loans exceeding $334 and delinquent in
excess of 60 days are evaluated for impairment. A loan is considered impaired
when it is probable that all contractual amounts due will not be collected in
accordance with the terms of the loan. A loan is not deemed to be impaired if a
delay in receipt of payment is expected to be less than 30 days or if, during a
longer period of delay, the Bank expects to collect all amounts due, including
interest accrued at the contractual rate during the period of the delay. At
December 31, 2003, there were no impaired loans. At December 31, 2004, all
impaired loans were on nonaccrual status. In addition, at December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, approximately $629 and $525, respectively, of one- to
four-family residential cooperative apartment loans with a balance of less than
$334 and consumer loans were on nonaccrual status. These loans are considered as
a homogeneous loan pool not subject to the provisions of SFAS 114.
Reserves
and Charge-Offs - The
Bank allocates a portion of its total allowance for loan losses to loans deemed
impaired under SFAS 114. All charge-offs on impaired loans are recorded as a
reduction in both loan principal and the allowance for loan losses. Management
evaluates the adequacy of its allowance for loan losses on a regular basis.
Management believes that its allowance at December 31, 2004 for impaired loans
was adequate. There was no allowance for impaired loans at December 31,
2003.
Measurement
of Impairment - Since all
impaired loans are collateralized by real estate properties, the fair value of
the collateral is utilized to measure impairment. The fair value of the
collateral is measured at soon as practicable after the loan becomes impaired
and periodically thereafter.
Income
Recognition -
Accrual of interest is discontinued on loans identified as impaired and past due
ninety days. Cash payments received on impaired loans subsequent to
discontinuation of interest accruals are applied initially to eliminate the
recorded accrued interest at the time of discontinuation. Additional cash
payments received beyond this level are recorded as regular principal and
interest payments.
6.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Changes
in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31 |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
June
30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Balance
at beginning of period |
$15,018 |
$15,458 |
|
$15,370 |
|
$15,459 |
Provision
charged to operations |
280 |
288 |
|
120 |
|
240 |
Loans
charged off |
(158) |
(63) |
|
(44) |
|
(349) |
Recoveries |
25 |
34 |
|
12 |
|
20 |
Transfer
from (to) of reserves on loan commitments |
378 |
(699) |
|
- |
|
- |
Balance
at end of period |
$15,543 |
$15,018 |
|
$15,458 |
|
$15,370 |
7.
MORTGAGE SERVICING ACTIVITIES
At
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 the Bank was servicing loans for others having
principal amounts outstanding of approximately $325,324, $191,445, and $108,067,
respectively, and at June 30, 2002, the Bank was servicing loans for others
having principal amounts outstanding of approximately $35,752. Servicing loans
for others generally consists of collecting mortgage payments, maintaining
escrow accounts, disbursing payments to investors and foreclosure processing.
The deferred servicing rights related to these loans totaled $2,500 and $2,277
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, including the servicing rights
associated with the multifamily loans sold to FNMA discussed below totaling
$2,226 and $1,995 at December 31, 2004 and 2003. MSR recognized from loan sales
were $731 and $955 during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Amortization of servicing rights was $508 and $409 during the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. Amortization of servicing rights was
immaterial during the six months ended December 31, 2002 and the year ended June
30, 2002. Servicing assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value and
are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, net servicing income.
The estimated fair value of loan servicing assets is determined by calculating
the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, using
assumptions of prepayments, defaults, servicing costs and discount rates that
the Company believes market participants would use for similar assets. In
connection with these loans serviced for others, the Bank held borrowers' escrow
balances of approximately $4,764 and $2,131 at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
Multifamily
Loans Sold To FNMA -
The Bank
implemented a program in December 2002 to originate and sell multifamily
residential mortgage loans in the secondary market to FNMA while retaining
servicing. The Bank underwrites these loans using either its customary
underwriting standards, funds the loans, and sells them to FNMA at agreed upon
pricing. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company serviced $295,800 and
$157,774 of loans sold pursuant to this program with corresponding loan
servicing assets of $2,226 and $1,995, respectively. Amortization of these
servicing rights was $441 and $364 during the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively. Amortization of this loan servicing asset was immaterial
during the six months ended December 31, 2002. Under the terms of the sales
program, the Company retains a portion of the associated credit risk. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company's maximum potential exposure related to
secondary market sales to FNMA with respect to this specific program was $13,124
and $6,529, respectively. The Company retains this level of exposure until the
portfolio of loans are paid in entirety or the Company funds claims by FNMA for
the maximum loss exposure. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had not
realized any losses related to these loans.
Reserves
of $1,543 and $761 were established as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, related to this exposure. The reserve recorded relating to this
exposure was included in the calculation of the gain on the sale of the loans.
No additional provisions relating to this exposure were recorded during the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the six months ended December 31,
2002.
Key
economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value of residual
cash flows to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those
assumptions are as follows:
|
At
December
31,
2004 |
At
December
31,
2003 |
At
December
31,
2002 |
Fair
value of the servicing asset |
$2,460 |
$1,995 |
$1,579 |
Weighted
average life (in years) |
7.25 |
7.25 |
7.5 |
Prepayment
speed assumptions (annual rate) |
152
PSA |
159
PSA |
200
PSA |
Impact
on fair value of 10% adverse change |
$(55) |
$(54) |
$(37) |
Impact
on fair value of 20% adverse change |
$(108) |
$(105) |
$(72) |
Expected
credit losses (annual rate) |
$341 |
$105 |
$47 |
Impact
on fair value of 10% adverse change |
$(306) |
$(10) |
$(4) |
Impact
on fair value of 20% adverse change |
$(609) |
$(19) |
$(9) |
Residual
cash flows discount rate (annual rate) |
10.50% |
9.75% |
9.75% |
Impact
on fair value of 10% adverse change |
$(52) |
$(61) |
$(38) |
Impact
on fair value of 20% adverse change |
$(101) |
$(119) |
$(76) |
Average
Interest rate on adjustable rate loans |
5.40% |
5.72% |
6.02% |
Impact
on fair value of 10% adverse change |
- |
- |
- |
Impact
on fair value of 20% adverse change |
- |
- |
- |
8.
PREMISES AND FIXED ASSETS
The
following is a summary of premises and fixed assets:
|
December
31,
2004 |
December
31,
2003 |
Land |
$2,308 |
$2,308 |
Buildings |
10,102 |
9,856 |
Leasehold
improvements |
12,736 |
11,925 |
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment |
11,785 |
10,830 |
|
36,931 |
34,919 |
Less:
accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(20,279) |
(18,801) |
|
$16,652 |
$16,118 |
Depreciation
and amortization expense amounted to approximately $1,490 and $1,412 during the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, $610 during the six months
ended December 31, 2002, and $1,097 for the year ended June 30,
2002.
9.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF NEW YORK CAPITAL STOCK
The Bank
is a Savings Bank Member of the FHLBNY. Membership requires the purchase of
shares of FHLBNY capital stock at $100 per share. The Bank owned 253,250 shares
and 267,000 shares at December 31, 2004 and 2003. The bank recorded dividends on
the FHLBNY capital stock of $488 and $1,299 during the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively, $774 during the six months ended December 31, 2002,
and $2,065 during the year ended June 30, 2002. During the fourth quarter of
2003, the FHLBNY significantly reduced its quarterly dividend payment on the
capital stock, which resulted in a decline in income received by the Company
during 2004.
10.
DUE TO DEPOSITORS
Deposits
are summarized as follows:
|
At
December 31, 2004 |
At
December 31, 2003 |
|
Effective
Cost |
Liability |
Effective
Cost |
Liability |
Savings
accounts |
0.56% |
$362,656 |
0.55% |
$366,592 |
Certificates
of deposit |
2.52 |
959,951 |
2.64 |
800,350 |
Money
market accounts |
1.40 |
749,040 |
1.35 |
745,387 |
NOW
and Super NOW accounts |
1.08 |
45,178 |
1.02 |
37,043 |
Non-interest
bearing checking accounts |
- |
93,224 |
- |
92,306 |
|
1.68% |
$2,210,049 |
1.65% |
$2,041,678 |
The
distribution of certificates of deposit by remaining maturity was as
follows:
|
At
December 31, |
At
December 31, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
Maturity
in one year or less |
$734,844 |
$552,924 |
Over
one year through three years |
190,354 |
178,220 |
Over
three years to five years |
34,741 |
69,203 |
Over
five years |
12 |
3 |
Total
certificates of deposit |
$959,951 |
$800,350 |
The
aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of
one-hundred thousand dollars was approximately $263,205 and $175,711 at December
31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
11.
SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE
Presented
below is information concerning securities sold with agreement to
repurchase:
|
At
or for the Fiscal
Year Ended
December 31, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
Balance
outstanding at end of period |
$205,584 |
$12,675 |
Average
interest cost at end of period |
2.48% |
4.96% |
Average
balance outstanding during the period |
$129,426 |
$71,302 |
Average
interest cost during the period (1) |
2.34% |
8.86% |
Carrying
value of underlying collateral at end of period |
$219,311 |
$12,967 |
Estimated
fair value of underlying collateral |
$216,754 |
$13,045 |
Maximum
balance outstanding at month end during the year |
$220,649 |
$86,020 |
(1) Amount
includes prepayment expenses of $2,555 recorded during the year ended December
31, 2003, which increased the average interest cost by 3.27% during the period.
There were no prepayments of securities sold under agreements to repurchase
during the year ended December 31, 2004.
-90-
12.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF NEW YORK ADVANCES
The Bank
had borrowings (''Advances'') from the FHLBNY totaling $506,500 and $534,000 at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The average interest cost of FHLBNY
Advances was 4.00% and 4.26% during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, 6.18% during the six months ended December 31, 2002, and 6.94%
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. The average interest rate on
outstanding FHLBNY Advances was 4.21% and 3.85% at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. At December 31, 2004, in accordance with its Advances, Collateral
Pledge and Security Agreement with the FHLBNY, the Bank maintained the requisite
qualifying collateral with the FHLBNY (principally real estate loans), as
defined by the FHLBNY, to secure such Advances. During the year ended December
31, 2003, the six months ended December 31, 2002 and the fiscal year ended June
30, 2002, prepayment expenses were paid on FHLBNY Advances totaling $1,589,
$3,642, and $5,848, respectively, and were recorded as interest expense on
FHLBNY Advances.
13.
SUBORDINATED NOTES PAYABLE AND TRUST PREFERRED SECURITIES
PAYABLE
On April
12, 2000, the Holding Company issued subordinated notes in the aggregate amount
of $25,000. The notes have a 9.25% fixed rate of interest and mature on May 1,
2010. Interest expense recorded on the notes, inclusive of amortization of
related issuance costs, was $2,396 during each of the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, $1,198 during the six months ended December 31, 2002, and $2,396
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.
On March
19, 2004, the Holding Company completed an offering of an aggregate amount of
$72,165 of trust preferred securities through Dime Community Capital Trust I, an
unconsolidated special purpose entity formed for the purpose of the offering. Of
the total amount offered, the Holding Company retained ownership of $2,165 of
the securities. The trust preferred securities bear a fixed interest rate of
7.0%, mature on April 14, 2034, and are callable without penalty at any time on
or after April 15, 2009.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, interest expense recorded on the trust
preferred securities totaled $4,016. Of this total interest payment, $118 was
paid to the Holding Company related to its $2,165 investment in the securities.
The $118 of income was recorded in other non-interest income.
14.
INCOME TAXES
The
Company's consolidated Federal, State and City income tax provisions were
comprised of the following:
|
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
Federal |
State
and
City |
Total |
|
Federal |
State
and
City |
Total |
Current |
$24,353 |
$3,629 |
$27,982 |
|
$30,202 |
$4,285 |
$34,487 |
Deferred |
(348) |
(185) |
(533) |
|
(3,439) |
(247) |
(3,686) |
|
$24,005 |
$3,444 |
$27,449 |
|
$26,763 |
$4,038 |
$30,801 |
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
Federal |
State
and
City |
Total |
|
Federal |
State
and City |
Total |
Current |
$17,318 |
$817 |
$18,135 |
|
$19,194 |
$2,532 |
$21,726 |
Deferred |
(4,800) |
673 |
(4,127) |
|
710 |
390 |
1,100 |
|
$12,518 |
$1,490 |
$14,008 |
|
$19,904 |
$2,922 |
$22,826 |
The
preceding table excludes tax effects recorded directly to stockholders’ equity
in connection with: unrealized gains and losses on securities
available-for-sale, stock-based compensation plans, and adjustment to other
comprehensive income relating to minimum pension liability. These tax effects
are disclosed as part of the presentation of the Statement of Changes in
Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income.
The
provision for income taxes differed from that computed at the Federal statutory
rate as follows:
|
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, |
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Tax
at Federal statutory rate |
$25,785 |
$28,727 |
|
$13,114 |
|
$21,526 |
State
and local taxes, net of
Federal
income tax benefit |
2,227 |
2,625 |
|
969 |
|
1,899 |
Benefit
plan differences |
288 |
419 |
|
202 |
|
282 |
Adjustments
for prior period tax returns |
(115) |
(114) |
|
- |
|
- |
Investment
in Bank Owned Life Insurance |
(685) |
(741) |
|
(393) |
|
(770) |
Other,
net |
(51) |
(115) |
|
116 |
|
(111) |
|
$27,449 |
$30,801 |
|
$14,008 |
|
$22,826 |
Effective
tax rate |
37.26% |
37.53% |
|
37.39% |
|
37.11% |
In
accordance with SFAS 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for
temporary differences between the book and tax bases of assets and
liabilities.
The
components of Federal and net State and City deferred income tax assets and
liabilities were as follows:
|
At
December 31, |
Deferred
tax assets: |
2004 |
2003 |
Excess
book bad debt over tax bad debt reserve (a) |
$6,836 |
$6,688 |
Employee
benefit plans (a) |
3,776 |
3,336 |
Tax
effect of other comprehensive income on securities available-for-sale
(b) |
2,678 |
723 |
Other
(a) |
422 |
51 |
Total
deferred tax assets |
13,712 |
10,798 |
Deferred
tax liabilities: |
|
|
Difference
in book and tax carrying value of fixed assets (b) |
614 |
31 |
Tax
effect of purchase accounting fair value adjustments (a) |
515 |
686 |
Other
(a) |
140 |
126 |
Total
deferred tax liabilities |
$1,269 |
$843 |
Net
deferred tax asset |
$12,443 |
$9,955 |
(a) |
Recorded
in other assets. |
(b) |
Portions
of this component of deferred taxes are recorded in other assets and other
liabilities. |
At
December 31, 2004, the Bank had approximately $60,000 of bad debt reserves for
New York State income tax purposes for which no provision for income tax was
required to be recorded. However, these bad debt reserves could be subject to
recapture into taxable income under certain circumstances. Approximately $15,000
of the Bank’s previously accumulated bad debt deductions were similarly subject
to potential recapture for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2004. A
New York State and Federal recapture liability could be triggered by certain
actions, including a distribution of these bad debt benefits to the Holding
Company or the failure of the Bank to qualify as a bank for federal or New York
tax purposes.
In order
for the Bank to be permitted to maintain a New York State tax bad debt reserve
for thrifts, certain thrift definitional tests must be satisfied on an ongoing
basis. These definitional tests include maintaining at least 60% of iassets in
thrift qualifying assets, as defined for tax purposes, and maintaining a thrift
charter. If the Bank failed to satisfy these definitional tests, the transition
to the reserve method permitted to commercial banks under New York State income
tax law would result in an increase in the New York State income tax provision,
and a deferred tax liability would be established to reflect the eventual
recapture of some or all of the New York bad debt reserve.
The
Company expects that it will take no action in the foreseeable future which
would require the establishment of a tax liability associated with these bad
debt reserves.
The
Company is subject to regular examination by various tax authorities in
jurisdictions that the Company has significant business operations. The Company
regularly assesses the likelihood of additional assessments in each of the tax
jurisdictions resulting from ongoing assessments. Tax reserves have been
established, which the Company believes to be adequate in relation to the
potential for additional assessments. Once established, reserves are adjusted as
information becomes available or in the event that an event requiring change in
the reserve occurs.
15.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Employee
Retirement Plan - The
Bank sponsors the Employee Retirement Plan, a tax-qualified, noncontributory,
defined-benefit retirement plan. Prior to April 1, 2000, substantially all
full-time employees of at least 21 years of age were eligible for participation
after one year of service. Effective April 1, 2000, the Bank froze all
participant benefits under the Employee Retirement Plan.
The net
periodic cost (credit) for the Employee Retirement Plan includes the following
components:
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
June
30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Interest
cost |
1,067 |
$1,081 |
|
$550 |
|
$1,084 |
Actual
return on plan assets |
(1,589) |
(1,504) |
|
(603) |
|
(1,316) |
Net
amortization and deferral |
584 |
634 |
|
99 |
|
38 |
Net
periodic cost (credit) |
$62 |
$211 |
|
$46 |
|
$(194) |
Major
assumptions utilized to determine the net periodic cost (credit) were as
follows:
Period
Ended |
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Discount
rate |
6.25% |
6.625% |
|
7.50% |
|
7.50% |
The
funded status of the Employee Retirement Plan was as follows:
|
December
31, |
December
31, |
Period
Ended |
2004 |
2003 |
Accumulated
benefit obligation at end of period |
$17,970 |
$17,597 |
Reconciliation
of Projected benefit obligation: |
|
|
Projected
benefit obligation at beginning of period |
$17,597 |
$16,753 |
Interest
cost |
1,067 |
1,081 |
Actuarial
loss |
371 |
827 |
Benefit
payments |
(1,058) |
(1,057) |
Settlements |
(7) |
(7) |
Projected
benefit obligation at end of period |
17,970 |
17,597 |
Plan
assets at fair value (investments in trust funds managed by
trustee) |
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
18,185 |
17,236 |
Return
on plan assets |
1,747 |
2,013 |
Contributions |
- |
- |
Benefit
payments |
(1,058) |
(1,057) |
Settlements |
(7) |
(7) |
Balance
at end of period |
18,867 |
18,185 |
|
|
|
Funded
status: |
|
|
Excess
of plan assets over projected benefit obligation |
897 |
588 |
Unrecognized
loss from experience different from that assumed |
7,272 |
7,643 |
Prepaid
retirement expense included in other assets |
$8,169 |
$8,231 |
The Bank
uses October 1st as its
measurement date for the Employee Retirement Plan. The Bank does not anticipate
making any contributions to the Employee Retirement Plan in 2005.
Major
assumptions utilized to determine the benefit obligations at December 31, 2004
and 2003 were as follows:
Period
Ended |
December
31,
2004 |
December
31,
2003 |
Discount
rate |
6.125% |
6.25% |
Expected
long-term return on plan assets |
9.00 |
9.00 |
Employee
Retirement Plan assets are invested in six diversified investment funds of RSI
Retirement Trust (the "Trust"), a no-load series open-ended mutual fund. The
investment funds include four equity mutual funds and two bond mutual funds,
each with its own investment objectives, investment strategies and risks, as
detailed in the Trust's prospectus. The Trust has been given discretion by the
Plan Sponsor to determine the appropriate strategic asset allocation versus plan
liabilities, as governed by the Trust's Statement of Investment Objectives and
Guidelines (the "Guidelines").
The
long-term investment objective is to be invested 65% in equity mutual funds and
35% in bond mutual funds. If the plan is underfunded under the Guidelines, the
bond fund portion will be temporarily increased to 50% in order to lessen asset
value volatility. When the Employee Retirement Plan is no longer underfunded,
the bond fund portion will be returned to 35%. Asset rebalancing is performed at
least annually, with interim adjustments made when the investment mix varies
more than 5% from the target (i.e. a 10%
target range).
The
investment goal is to achieve investment results that will contribute to the
proper funding of the Employee Retirement Plan by exceeding the rate of
inflation over the long-term. In addition, investment managers for the Trust are
expected to provide above average performance when compared to their peer
managers. Performance volatility is also monitored. Risk/volatility is further
managed by the distinct investment objectives of each of the Trust funds and the
diversification within each fund.
The
weighted average allocation by asset category of the assets of the Employee
Retirement Plan were summarized as follows:
Asset
Category |
At
December 31, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
Equity
securities |
69% |
67% |
Debt
securities (bond mutual funds) |
31 |
33 |
Total |
100% |
100% |
These
allocations as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 are consistent with future planned
allocation percentages as of December 31, 2004.
The
expected long-term rate of return on Employee Retirement Plan assets assumptions
were established based upon historical returns earned by equities and fixed
income securities, adjusted to reflect expectations of future returns as applied
to the Employee Retirement Plan's target allocation of asset classes. Equities
and fixed income securities were assumed to earn real rates of return in the
ranges of 5% to 9% and 2% to 6%, respectively. The long-term inflation rate was
estimated to be 3%. When these overall return expectations are applied to the
plan's target allocation, the expected rate of return is determined to be 9.0%,
which approximates the midpoint of the range of the expected return.
Benefit
payments, which reflect expected future service (as appropriate), are expected
to be made as follows:
Year
Ending December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
$1,155 |
2006 |
|
1,158 |
2007 |
|
1,167 |
2008 |
|
1,184 |
2009 |
|
1,174 |
2010
to 2014 |
|
6,040 |
BMP
and Retirement Plan for Board Members of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
("Directors' Retirement Plan") - The
Holding Company and Bank maintain the BMP, which exists in order to compensate
executive officers for any curtailments in benefits due to the statutory
limitations on benefit plans. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the BMP had an
investment in the Holding Company's common stock of $12,421 and $5,584,
respectively. Benefit accruals under the defined benefit portion of the BMP were
suspended on April 1, 2000, when they were suspended under the Employee
Retirement Plan.
Effective
July 1, 1996, the Bank established the Directors' Retirement Plan, which
provides benefits to each eligible outside director commencing upon their
termination of Board service or at age 65. Each outside director automatically
becomes a participant in the Directors' Retirement Plan.
The
combined cost for the defined benefit portion of the BMP and the Directors'
Retirement Plan includes the following components:
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31 |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Service
cost |
$30 |
$25 |
|
$9 |
|
$17 |
Interest
cost |
289 |
310 |
|
152 |
|
291 |
Net
amortization and deferral |
123 |
130 |
|
52 |
|
105 |
|
$442 |
$465 |
|
$213 |
|
$413 |
Major
assumptions utilized to determine the net periodic cost (credit) for the BMP
were as follows:
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Discount
rate |
6.25% |
6.625% |
|
7.50% |
|
7.50% |
Major
assumptions utilized to determine the net periodic cost (credit) for the
Directors Retirement Plan were as follows:
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Discount
rate |
6.25% |
6.50% |
|
6.50% |
|
7.00% |
Rate
of increase in fee compensation levels |
4.0 |
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
|
4.0 |
The
defined contribution costs incurred by the Company related to the BMP were $404
and $1,975 respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, $2,169
for the six months ended December 31, 2002 and $1,264 for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2002. There is no defined contribution cost incurred by the Holding
Company or Bank under the Directors' Retirement Plan.
The
combined funded status of the defined benefit portion of the BMP and Directors'
Retirement Plan was as follows:
|
December
31, |
December
31, |
Period
Ended |
2004 |
2003 |
Accumulated
benefit obligation at end of period |
$4,530 |
$4,226 |
Reconciliation
of Projected benefit obligation: |
|
|
Projected
benefit obligation at beginning of period |
$4,645 |
$4,735 |
Service
cost |
30 |
25 |
Interest
cost |
289 |
310 |
Benefit
payments |
(31) |
(10) |
Actuarial
(gain) loss |
(16) |
(415) |
Projected
benefit obligation at end of period |
4,917 |
4,645 |
|
|
|
Plan
assets at fair value: |
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
- |
- |
Contributions |
31 |
10 |
Benefit
payments |
(31) |
(10) |
Balance
at end of period |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Funded
status: |
|
|
Deficiency
of plan assets over projected benefit obligation |
(4,917) |
(4,645) |
Contributions
by employer |
8 |
8 |
Unrecognized
loss from experience different from that assumed |
(201) |
181 |
Unrecognized
net past service liability |
619 |
376 |
Accrued
expense included in other liabilities |
$(4,491) |
$(4,080) |
|
|
|
Amount
recognized in statement of financial condition consists
of: |
|
|
Accrued liability |
$(4,491) |
$(4,080) |
Net amount recognized |
$(4,491) |
$(4,080) |
Major
assumptions utilized to determine the benefit obligations at December 31, 2004
and 2003 were as follows:
Period
Ended |
December
31, 2004 |
|
December
31, 2003 |
|
BMP |
Directors'
Retirement Plan |
|
BMP |
Directors'
Retirement Plan |
Discount
rate |
6.125% |
6.00% |
|
6.25% |
6.25% |
Rate
of increase in compensation levels |
- |
4.00 |
|
- |
4.00 |
The Bank
uses October 1st as its
measurement date for both the BMP and Directors' Retirement Plan. Both the BMP
and the Directors' Retirement Plan are unfunded non-qualified benefit plans that
are not anticipated to ever hold assets for investment. Any contributions made
to either the BMP or the Directors' Retirement Plan are expected to be used
immediately to pay benefits that come due.
The Bank
does not expect to make any contributions to the BMP during the year ending
December 31, 2005. The Bank expects to contribute $80 to the Directors'
Retirement Plan during the year ending December 31, 2005 in order to pay
benefits due under the plan.
Combined
benefit payments under the BMP and the Directors' Retirement Plan, which reflect
expected future service (as appropriate), are expected to be made as
follows:
Year
Ending December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
$80 |
2006 |
|
325 |
2007 |
|
330 |
2008 |
|
338 |
2009 |
|
346 |
2010
to 2014 |
|
2,019 |
401(k)
Plan - The Bank
also maintains the 401(k) Plan which covers substantially all employees. The
401(k) Plan annually receives the proceeds from a 100% vested cash contribution
to all participants in the ESOP in the amount of 3% of "covered compensation"
[defined as total W-2 compensation including amounts deducted from W-2
compensation for pre-tax benefits such as health insurance premiums and
contributions to the 401(k) Plan] up to applicable Internal Revenue Service
limits. Effective March 1, 2004, any compensation resulting from either the
grant or vesting of restricted stock or the exercise of stock options is
excluded from "covered compensation." Previously, these amounts had been
included. The participants have the ability to invest this contribution in any
of the investment options offered under the 401(k) Plan. Otherwise, the Bank
makes no other contributions to the 401(k) Plan. Expenses associated with this
contribution totaled $457 and $393 during the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively, $180 during the six months ended December 31, 2002, and $300
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.
401(k)
Plan - The Bank
also maintains the 401(k) Plan which covers substantially all employees. The
401(k) Plan annually receives the proceeds from a 100% vested cash contribution
to all participants in the ESOP in the amount of 3% of "covered compensation"
[defined as total W-2 compensation including amounts deducted from W-2
compensation for pre-tax benefits such as health insurance premiums and
contributions to the 401(k) Plan] up to applicable Internal Revenue Service
limits. Effective March 1, 2004, any compensation resulting from either the
grant or vesting of restricted stock or the exercise of stock options is
excluded from "covered compensation." Previously, these amounts had been
included. The participants have the ability to invest this contribution in any
of the investment options offered under the 401(k) Plan. Otherwise, the Bank
makes no other contributions to the 401(k) Plan. Expenses associated with this
contribution totaled $457 and $393 during the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively, $180 during the six months ended December 31, 2002, and $300
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.
The
401(k) plan owns participant investments in the Holding Company's common stock
for the accounts of participants which totaled $10,147 and $12,917 at December
31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Postretirement
Benefit Plan - The
Bank offers the Postretirement Benefit Plan to its retired employees who have
provided at least five consecutive years of credited service and were active
employees prior to April 1, 1991, as follows:
(1)
Qualified employees who retired prior to April 1, 1991 receive the full medical
coverage until their death at no cost to such retirees;
(2)
Qualified employees retiring after April 1, 1991 are eligible for continuation
of the medical coverage in effect at the time of retirement until their death.
Throughout retirement, the Bank will continue to pay the premiums for the
coverage not to exceed the premium amount paid for the first year of retirement
coverage. Should the premiums increase, the employee is required to pay the
differential to maintain full medical coverage.
Postretirement
Benefit Plan benefits are available only to full-time employees who commence
collecting retirement benefits immediately upon termination of service from the
Bank. The Bank reserves the right at any time, to the extent permitted by law,
to change, terminate or discontinue any of the group benefits, and can exercise
the maximum discretion permitted by
law, in
administering, interpreting, modifying or taking any other action with respect
to the plans or benefits.
The
Postretirement Benefit Plan cost includes the following components:
|
Year
Ended December 31, |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Service
cost |
$57 |
$57 |
|
$21 |
|
$36 |
Interest
cost |
230 |
242 |
|
120 |
|
183 |
Unrecognized
past service liability |
(28) |
(28) |
|
(14) |
|
(28) |
Amortization
of unrealized gain/loss |
33 |
41 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
$292 |
$312 |
|
$127 |
|
$191 |
Major
assumptions utilized to determine the net periodic cost (credit) were as
follows:
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended December 31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Discount
rate |
6.25% |
6.625% |
|
7.50% |
|
7.25% |
Rate
of increase in compensation levels |
3.50 |
4.00 |
|
4.75 |
|
4.75 |
An
escalation in the assumed medical care cost trend rates by 1% in each year would
increase the net periodic cost by approximately $8. A decline in the assumed
medical care cost trend rates by 1% in each year would decrease the accumulated
Postretirement Benefit Plan obligation by approximately $7.
The
funded status of the Postretirement Benefit Plan was as follows:
|
At
December 31, |
At
December 31, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
Accumulated
benefit obligation at end of period |
$4,271 |
$3,779 |
Reconciliation
of Projected benefit obligation: |
|
|
Projected
benefit obligation at beginning of period |
$3,779 |
$3,758 |
Service
cost |
57 |
57 |
Interest
cost |
230 |
242 |
Actuarial
loss |
367 |
(94) |
Benefit
payments |
(162) |
(184) |
Projected
benefit obligation at end of period |
4,271 |
3,779 |
|
|
|
Plan
assets at fair value: |
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period |
- |
- |
Contributions |
162 |
184 |
Benefit
payments |
(162) |
(184) |
Balance
at end of period |
- |
- |
|
|
|
Funded
status: |
|
|
(Deficiency)
of plan assets over projected benefit obligation |
(4,271) |
(3,779) |
Unrecognized
loss from experience different from that assumed |
1,239 |
913 |
Unrecognized
net past service liability |
(112) |
(140) |
Accrued
expense included in other liabilities |
$(3,114) |
$(3,006) |
The Bank
uses October 1st as its
measurement date for the Postretirement Benefit Plan. The assumed medical care
cost trend rate used in computing the accumulated Postretirement Benefit Plan
obligation was 10.0% in 2004 and was assumed to decrease gradually to 4.25% in
2011 and remain at that level thereafter. An escalation in the assumed medical
care cost
trend
rates by 1% in each year would increase the accumulated Postretirement Benefit
Plan obligation by approximately $234. A decline in the assumed medical care
cost trend rates by 1% in each year would decrease the accumulated
Postretirement Benefit Plan obligation by approximately $205. The assumed
discount rate and rate of compensation increase used to measure the accumulated
Postretirement Benefit Plan obligation at December 31, 2004 were 6.125% and
3.25%, respectively. The assumed discount rate and rate of compensation increase
used to measure the accumulated Postretirement Benefit Plan obligation at
December 31, 2003 were 6.25% and 3.5%, respectively. The assumed discount rate
and rate of compensation increase used to measure the accumulated Postretirement
Benefit Plan obligation at December 31, 2002 were 6.625% and 4.0%, respectively.
The assumed discount rate and rate of compensation increase used to measure the
accumulated Postretirement Benefit Plan obligation at June 30, 2002 were 7.50%
and 4.75%, respectively.
On
January 12, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-1, "Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003" ("FSP 106-1"). FSP 106-1 permits
employers that sponsor postretirement benefit plans (plan sponsors) that provide
prescription drug benefits to retirees to make a one-time election to defer the
accounting impact, if any, of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and
Modernization Act of 2003 (the "Act"), which was enacted into law on December 8,
2003. The Company has elected to defer recognition of the provisions of the Act
as permitted by FSP 106-1 due to uncertainties regarding some of the new
Medicare provisions and a lack of authoritative accounting guidance regarding
certain matters. Changes to previously reported information may be required
depending on the transition guidance issued in future authoritative
guidance.
In May
2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement Position No. 106-2 ("FSP 106-2") to provide
guidance on accounting for the effects of the Act, to employers that sponsor
postretirement health care plans which provide prescription drug benefits. FSP
106-2 supersedes FSP 106-1. FSP 106-2 applies only to sponsors of
single-employer defined benefit postretirement health care plans for which (1)
the employer has concluded that prescription drug benefits available under the
plan to some or all participants, for some or all future years, are "actuarially
equivalent" to Medicare Part D and thus qualify for the subsidy provided by the
Act, and (2) the expected subsidy will offset or reduce the employer's share of
the cost of the underlying postretirement prescription drug coverage on which
the subsidy is based. FSP 106-2 provides guidance on measuring the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation ("APBO") and net periodic postretirement
benefit cost, and the effects of the Act on the APBO. Since the Company is
currently assessing whether the benefits provided by the Posretirement Benefit
Plan are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D under the Act, the measure of
the APBO or net periodic postretirement benefit cost disclosed in the
consolidated financial statements did not reflect any amount associated with the
subsidy.
The
Postretirment Benefit Plan is an unfunded non-qualified benefit plan that is not
anticipated to ever hold assets for investment. Any contributions made to the
Postretirement Benefit Plan are expected to be used immediately to pay benefits
that come due.
The Bank
expects to contribute $187 to the Postretirement Benefit Plan during the year
ending December 31, 2005 in order to pay benefits due under the
plan.
Benefit
payments under the Postretirement Benefit Plan, which reflect expected future
service (as appropriate), are expected to be made as follows:
Year
Ending December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
$187 |
2006 |
|
187 |
2007 |
|
187 |
2008 |
|
182 |
2009 |
|
182 |
2010
to 2014 |
|
997 |
ESOP
- - The
Holding Company adopted the ESOP in connection with the Bank's conversion to
stock ownership. The ESOP borrowed $11,638 from the Holding Company and used the
funds to purchase 3,927,825 shares of the Holding Company's common stock. The
loan was originally to be repaid principally from the Bank's discretionary
contributions to the ESOP over a period of time not to exceed 10 years from the
date of the conversion. Effective July 1, 2000 the loan agreement was amended to
extend the repayment period to thirty years from the date of the conversion,
with the right of optional prepayment. In exchange for the extension of the loan
agreement, various benefits were offered to participants, which included the
addition
of pre-tax employee contributions to the 401(k) Plan, a 3% annual employer
contribution to the ESOP [which is automatically transferred to the 401(k)
Plan], and the pass-through of cash dividends received by the ESOP to the
individual participants. The loan had an outstanding balance of $4,749 and
$5,202 at December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, and a fixed
rate of 8.0%.
Shares
purchased with the loan proceeds are held in a suspense account for allocation
among participants as the loan is repaid. Contributions to the ESOP and shares
released from the suspense account are allocated among participants on the basis
of compensation, as defined in the plan, in the year of allocation. ESOP
distributions vest at a rate of 25% per year of service, beginning after two
years, with full vesting after five years, or upon attainment of age 65, death,
disability, retirement or in the event of a "change of control" of the Holding
Company as defined in the ESOP. Common stock allocated to participating
employees totaled 149,219 shares, 149,219 shares, 149,217 shares and 149,217
shares during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six months ended
December 31, 2002, and the year ended June 30, 2002, respectively. The ESOP
benefit expense recorded in accordance with Statement of Position No. 93-6 for
allocated shares totaled $2,475, $2,434, $1,073, and $1,838, respectively, for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six months ended December 31,
2002, and the year ended June 30, 2002.
As
indicated previously, effective July 1, 2000, the Holding Company or the Bank
became required to make a 100% vested cash contribution annually to all ESOP
participants in the amount of 3% of "covered compensation" as defined in the
ESOP. This contribution is guaranteed until December 31, 2006 (unless the ESOP
is terminated prior thereto) and will be discretionary after that date. This
annual contribution is made in January of each year based upon the total covered
compensation through December 31st of the
previous year. The participant possesses the ability to invest this contribution
in any of the investment options offered under the 401(k) Plan.
Stock
Benefit Plans
RRP - In
December 1996, the Holding Company's shareholders approved the RRP, which is
designed to retain key officers and directors of the Holding Company and Bank,
as well as to provide these persons with a proprietary interest in the Company.
On February 1, 1997, the Holding Company allocated 1,963,913 shares of stock to
employees and outside directors. These shares vested in equal installments on
February 1, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002. On each
vesting date, the RRP re-acquired shares that were sold by RRP participants in
order to fund income tax obligations associated with their individual vesting of
shares. In addition, during the period February 1, 1997 through February 1, 2002
the RRP re-acquired shares that were forfeited by participants. The shares
re-acquired by the RRP during the period February 1, 1997 through February 1,
2002, either through the repurchase or forfeiture of previously allocated
shares, totaled 343,797. On May 17, 2002, a grant of 67,500 RRP shares was made
to certain officers of the Bank. These shares vest as follows: 20% on November
25, 2002, and 20% each on April 25, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. The RRP has
re-acquired 16,181 shares of common stock that were sold by RRP participants in
order to fund income tax obligations associated with their individual vesting of
shares under the May 17, 2002 grant. At December 31, 2004, 292,478 shares held
by the RRP remained eligible for future allocation. The Company continues to
account for compensation expense under the RRP pursuant to Accounting Principles
Board No. 25, measuring compensation cost based upon the average acquisition
value of the RRP shares.
The
following is a summary of activity related to the RRP for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six months ended December 31, 2002 and the year
ended June 30, 2002:
|
At
or for the
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, |
|
At
or for the
Six-Months
Ended December 31, |
|
At
or for the
Fiscal
Year Ended
June
30 |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Shares
acquired (a) |
5,493 |
5,403 |
|
5,285 |
|
75,339 |
Shares
vested |
13,500 |
13,500 |
|
13,500 |
|
349,164 |
Shares
allocated |
- |
- |
|
- |
|
67,500 |
Unallocated
shares - end of period |
292,478 |
286,985 |
|
281,582 |
|
276,297 |
Unvested
allocated shares - end of period |
27,000 |
40,500 |
|
54,000 |
|
67,500 |
Compensation
recorded to expense |
$108 |
$108 |
|
$143 |
|
$1,152 |
(a)
Represents shares re-acquired from either participant sales of vested shares in
order to satisfy income tax obligations or participant forfeitures.
Stock
Option Plans
1996
Stock Option Plan - In
November 1996, the Holding Company adopted the 1996 Stock Option Plan, which
permits the Company to grant up to 4,909,781 incentive or non-qualified stock
options to outside directors, officers and other employees of the Holding
Company or the Bank. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
administers the 1996 Stock Option Plan and authorizes all option grants.
On
December 26, 1996, 4,702,796 stock options were granted to outside directors,
officers and certain employees under the 1996 Stock Option Plan, all of which
are fully exercisable at December 31, 2004. On January 20, 2000, 224,435 stock
options remaining under the 1996 Stock Option Plan were granted to officers and
certain employees. All of these stock options expire on January 20, 2010.
One-fifth of the shares granted to participants under this grant were
exercisable by participants on January 20, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005,
respectively. No stock options may be granted under the 1996 Stock Option Plan
after December 26, 2006.
On
January 21, 1999, holders of stock options which had been granted by FIBC to
purchase 327,290 shares of FIBC common stock were converted into options to
purchase 598,331 shares of the Holding Company's common stock (the "Converted
Options"). The expiration dates on all Converted Options remained unchanged from
the initial grant by FIBC, and all Converted Options were fully exercisable at
December 31, 2004.
2001
Stock Option Plan - In
September 2001, the Holding Company adopted the 2001 Stock Option Plan, which
permits the Company to grant up to 1,771,875 incentive or non-qualified stock
options to officers and other employees of the Holding Company or the Bank and
253,125 non-qualified stock options to outside directors of the Holding Company
or Bank. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers the
2001 Stock Option Plan and authorizes all option grants.
On
November 21, 2001, 540,447 stock options under the 2001 Stock Option Plan were
granted to officers and certain employees. All of these stock options expire on
November 21, 2011. One-fourth of the options under this grant become exercisable
by participants on November 21, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. On
November 21, 2001, 67,500 stock options under the 2001 Stock Option Plan were
granted to outside directors. All of these stock options expire on November 21,
2011 and became exercisable by the respective directors on November 21, 2002.
On
February 1, 2003, 604,041 stock options under the 2001 Stock Option Plan were
granted to officers and certain employees. All of these stock options expire on
February 1, 2013. One-fourth of the options under this grant become exercisable
by participants on February 1, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. On
February 1, 2003, 75,000 stock options under the 2001 Stock Option Plan were
granted to outside directors. All of these stock options expire on February 1,
2013 and became exercisable by the respective directors on February 1, 2004.
On
January 27, 2004, 632,874 stock options under the 2001 Stock Option Plan were
granted to officers and certain employees. All of these stock options expire on
January 27, 2014. One-fourth of the options under this grant become exercisable
by participants on January 27, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively. On
January 27, 2004, 81,000 stock options under the 2001 Stock Option Plan were
granted to outside directors. All of these stock options expire on January 27,
2014 and became exercisable by the respective directors on January 27, 2005.
-101-
Combined
activity related to the Stock Plans for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, the six months ended December 31, 2002, and the fiscal year ended June 30,
2002 is as follows:
|
At
or for the
Year
Ended December 31, |
|
At
or for the
Six
Months Ended December 31 |
|
At
or for the
Year
Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Options
outstanding - beginning of period |
2,939,286 |
3,530,568 |
|
4,108,917 |
|
5,115,373 |
Options
granted |
713,873 |
679,041 |
|
- |
|
607,947 |
Weighted
average exercise price of grants |
$19.90 |
$13.15 |
|
- |
|
$10.91 |
Options
exercised |
971,052 |
1,263,244 |
|
574,074 |
|
1,610,803 |
Weighted
average exercise price of exercised options |
$4.52 |
$4.29 |
|
$4.25 |
|
$4.21 |
Options
forfeited |
2,672 |
7,079 |
|
4,275 |
|
3,600 |
Weighted
average exercise price of forfeited options |
$14.10 |
$12.75 |
|
$7.90 |
|
$8.53 |
Options
outstanding - end of period |
2,679,435 |
2,939,286 |
|
3,530,568 |
|
4,108,917 |
Weighted
average exercise price ofoutstanding
options - end of period |
$11.87 |
$7.49 |
|
$5.27 |
|
$5.13 |
Remaining
options available for grant under the Stock Plans |
62,478 |
774,649 |
|
1,446,621 |
|
1,442,346 |
Exercisable
options at end of period |
1,342,518 |
1,913,196 |
|
3,000,000 |
|
3,372,607 |
Weighted
average exercise price on exercisable
options - end of period |
$7.50 |
$5.15 |
|
$4.55 |
|
$4.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information
regarding the range of exercise prices and weighted average remaining
contractual life of both options outstanding and options exercisable as of
December 31, 2004 is summarized as follows:
Range
of Exercise Prices |
Outstanding
as
of
December
31, 2004 |
Exercisable
as
of
December
31, 2004 |
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price |
Weighted
Average Contractual Years Remaining |
$2.00
- $2.50 |
15,000 |
15,000 |
$2.32 |
1.8 |
$2.51
- $3.00 |
144,478 |
144,478 |
2.81 |
2.4 |
$4.00
- $4.50 |
538,141 |
538,141 |
4.30 |
2.0 |
$4.51
- $5.00 |
70,311 |
27,447 |
4.56 |
5.1 |
$10.50
- $11.00 |
547,483 |
414,175 |
10.91 |
6.9 |
$13.00-$13.50 |
650,710 |
203,277 |
13.16 |
8.1 |
$19.50-$20.00 |
713,312 |
- |
19.90 |
9.1 |
The
weighted average fair value per option at the date of grant/conversion for stock
options granted/converted was estimated as follows:
|
Granted
Options(a) |
FIBC
Converted
Options |
|
|
|
Estimated
fair value on date of grant/conversion |
$2.48 |
$4.09 |
Pricing
methodology utilized |
Binomial
Option/ Black- Scholes |
Binomial
Option |
Expected
life (in years) |
6.4 |
7.5 |
Interest
rate |
5.22% |
5.25% |
Volatility |
26.76 |
22.78 |
Dividend
yield |
1.93 |
2.00 |
(a)
Represents weighted average values of stock options granted on December 26,
1996, January 20, 2000, November 21, 2001, February 1, 2003 and January 27,
2004.
2004
Stock Incentive Plan - In
November 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan which permits
the Company to grant up to a total 1,496,300 restricted stock awards, incentive
or non-qualified stock options or stock appreciation rights to outside
directors, officers and other employees of the Holding Company or the Bank. Of
the total shares
eligible
for grant under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, only up to 374,075 shares may be
granted as restricted stock awards. The full amount of 1,496,300 shares may be
issued either fully as stock options or stock appreciation rights, or a
combination thereof. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
administers the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and authorizes all equity grants. As
of December 31, 2004, no equity grants were issued to employees or outside
Directors of the Company under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.
16.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Mortgage
Loan Commitments and Lines of Credit - At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Bank had outstanding commitments to make real
estate loans aggregating approximately $57,407 and $94,500,
respectively.
At
December 31, 2004, commitments to originate fixed-rate and adjustable-rate real
estate loans were $7,372 and $50,035 respectively. Interest rates on fixed-rate
commitments ranged between 4.50% and 7.50%. Substantially all of the Bank's
commitments will expire within three months of their acceptance by the
prospective borrower. A concentration risk exists with these commitments as
virtually all of them involve multifamily and underlying cooperative properties
located within the New York City metropolitan area.
At
December 31, 2004, unused lines of credit offered on one- to four-family
residential, multifamily residential and commercial real estate loans totaled
$33,730. At December 31, 2004, unused commitments to extend credit related
construction loans and overdraft checking accounts totaled $11,830 and $5,308,
respectively.
The Bank
had available at December 31, 2004 unused lines of credit with the FHLBNY
totaling $100,000 expiring on September 13, 2005.
Lease
Commitments - At
December 31, 2004, aggregate minimum annual rental commitments on leases were as
follows:
Year
Ending December 31, |
Amount |
2005 |
1,004 |
2006 |
1,021 |
2007 |
1,002 |
2008 |
832 |
2009 |
821 |
Thereafter |
3,269 |
Total |
$7,949 |
Rental
expense for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six months ended
December 31, 2002 and the year ended June 30, 2002 approximated $1,190, $1,117,
$533, $906, respectively.
Litigation
- - The
Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain pending and threatened legal
actions which arise out of the normal course of business. Litigation is
inherently unpredictable, particularly in proceedings where claimants seek
substantial or indeterminate damages, or in instances in which the legal
proceedings are in their early stages. The Company cannot predict with certainty
the actual loss or range of loss related to such legal proceedings, how or when
they will be resolved, or what the ultimate settlement may be. Consequently, the
Company cannot estimate losses or ranges of losses related to such legal
matters, even in instances where it is reasonably possibility that a future loss
will be incurred. In the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel,
the resolution of all ongoing legal proceedings will not have a material adverse
effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the
Company. The Company accounts for potential losses related to litigation in
accordance with SFAS No. 5 "Accounting for Contingencies." As of December 31,
2004 and 2003, there were no reserves provided for potential losses related to
litigation matters.
17.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The
estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available
market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However,
considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the
estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current
market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation
methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value
amounts.
Cash
and Due From Banks - The fair
value is assumed to be equal to their carrying value as these amounts are due
upon demand.
Investment
Securities and Mortgage-Backed Securities - The
fair value of these securities is based on quoted market prices obtained from an
independent pricing service.
Federal
Funds Sold and Short Term Investments - The
fair value of these assets, principally overnight deposits, is assumed to be
equal to their carrying value due to their short maturity.
FHLBNY
Capital Stock - The
fair value of FHLBNY stock is assumed to be equal to the carrying value as the
stock is carried at par value and redeemable at par value by the
FHLBNY.
Loans
and Loans Held for Sale - The
fair value of loans receivable is determined by utilizing either secondary
market prices, or, to a greater extent, by discounting the future cash flows,
net of prepayments of the loans, using a rate for which similar loans would be
originated with similar terms to new borrowers. This methodology is applied to
all loans, inclusive of impaired and non-accrual loans.
MSR
- The fair value of the MSR is measured by the discounted cash flows
through contractual maturity.
Accrued
Interest Receivable - The
estimated fair value of accrued
interest is its carrying amount receivable.
Deposits
- The
fair value of savings, money market, NOW, Super NOW and checking accounts is
assumed to be their carrying amount. The fair value of certificates of deposit
is based upon the discounted value of contractual cash flows using current rates
for instruments of the same remaining maturity.
Escrow
and Other Deposits - The
estimated fair value of escrow and other deposits is assumed to be their
carrying amount payable.
Borrowed
Funds - For
borrowed funds with stated maturity or subsequent interest rate repricing dates
occurring within one year, the carrying value is the best estimate of fair
value. For borrowings with stated maturity or subsequent interest rate repricing
dates occurring after one year, the fair value is measured by the discounted
cash flows through contractual maturity or next interest repricing date, or an
earlier call date if the borrowing is expected to be called, as of the balance
sheet date. The carrying amount of accrued interest payable on borrowed funds is
its fair value.
Accrued
Interest Payable - The
estimated fair value of accrued
interest is its carrying amount payable.
Other
Liabilities - The
estimated fair value of other liabilities, which primarily include trade
accounts payable, is assumed to be their carrying amount.
Commitments
to Extend Credit - The
fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently
charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining
terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.
For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference
between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.
The
estimated fair values of the Company's consolidated financial instruments at
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were as follows:
December
31, 2004 |
Carrying
Amount |
Fair
Value |
Assets: |
|
|
Cash
and due from banks |
$26,581 |
$26,581 |
Investment
securities held-to-maturity |
585 |
589 |
Investment
securities available-for-sale |
54,840 |
54,840 |
Mortgage-backed
securities held-to-maturity |
465 |
485 |
Mortgage-backed
securities available-for-sale |
519,420 |
519,420 |
Loans,
net |
2,480,771 |
2,512,881 |
Loans
held for sale |
5,491 |
5,491 |
MSR |
2,226 |
2,460 |
Federal
funds sold and short-term investments |
103,291 |
103,291 |
Accrued
interest receivable |
12,969 |
12,969 |
FHLBNY
capital stock |
25,325 |
25,325 |
Liabilities: |
|
|
Savings,
money market, NOW, Super NOW and checking
accounts |
1,250,098 |
1,250,098 |
Certificates
of deposit |
959,951 |
959,211 |
Escrow
and other deposits |
48,284 |
48,284 |
Borrowed
funds |
809,249 |
818,484 |
Accrued
interest payable |
3,996 |
3,996 |
Off
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Commitments
to extend credit |
- |
(357) |
December
31, 2003 |
Carrying
Amount |
Fair
Value |
Assets: |
|
|
Cash
and due from banks |
$24,073 |
$24,073 |
Investment
securities held-to-maturity |
710 |
718 |
Investment
securities available-for-sale |
37,107 |
37,107 |
Mortgage-backed
securities held-to-maturity |
770 |
822 |
Mortgage-backed
securities available-for-sale |
461,967 |
461,967 |
Loans,
net |
2,175,572 |
2,223,654 |
Loans
held for sale |
2,050 |
2,050 |
MSR |
1,995 |
1,995 |
Federal
funds sold and short-term investments |
95,286 |
95,286 |
Accrued
interest receivable |
12,030 |
12,030 |
FHLBNY
capital stock |
26,700 |
26,700 |
Liabilities: |
|
|
Savings,
money market, NOW, Super NOW and checking
accounts |
1,241,328 |
1,241,328 |
Certificates
of deposit |
800,350 |
806,565 |
Escrow
and other deposits |
39,941 |
39,941 |
Borrowed
funds |
571,675 |
591,380 |
Accrued
interest payable |
2,850 |
2,850 |
Off
Balance Sheet |
|
|
Commitments
to extend credit |
- |
(717) |
The
Holding Company purchased 1,987,529 shares, 1,612,500 shares, 818,250 shares,
and 1,125,786 shares of its common stock into treasury during the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the six months ended December 31, 2002 and the year
ended June 30, 2002, respectively. All shares were purchased in accordance with
applicable regulations of the OTS and
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
19.
REGULATORY MATTERS
The Bank
is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the
federal banking agencies. Failure to satisfy minimum capital requirements can
initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by
regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the
Company's financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must satisfy
specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets,
liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated pursuant to
regulatory accounting practices. The Bank's capital amounts and classification
are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components,
risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative
measures that have been established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy
require the Bank to maintain minimum capital amounts and ratios (set forth in
the table below). The Bank's primary regulatory agency, the OTS, requires that
the Bank maintain minimum ratios of tangible capital (as defined in the
regulations) of 1.5%, and total risk-based capital (as defined in the
regulations) of 8%. In addition, insured institutions in the strongest financial
and managerial condition, with a rating of one (the highest rating of the OTS
under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System) are required to maintain
a Leverage Capital Ratio (the "Leverage Capital Ratio") of not less than 3.0% of
total assets. For all other banks, the minimum Leverage Capital Ratio
requirement is 4.0%, unless a higher leverage capital ratio is warranted by the
particular circumstances or risk profile of the institution. The Bank is also
subject to prompt corrective action requirement regulations promulgated by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. These regulations require the Bank to
maintain a minimum of Total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations)
to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), and of Tier I capital
to average assets (as defined in the regulations). As of December 31, 2004, the
Bank satisfied all capital adequacy requirements to which it is
subject.
As of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Bank satisfied all criteria necessary to be
categorized as "well capitalized" under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as "well capitalized" the Bank must
maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios
as set forth in the following tables:
|
Actual |
|
For
Capital
Adequacy
Purposes |
|
To
Be Categorized as "Well Capitalized" |
As
of December 31, 2004 |
Amount |
Ratio |
|
Amount |
Ratio |
|
Amount |
Ratio |
Tangible
capital |
$256,955 |
7.88% |
|
$48,937 |
1.5% |
|
N/A |
N/A |
Leverage
capital |
256,955 |
7.88 |
|
130,498 |
4.0% |
|
N/A |
N/A |
Total
risk-based capital (to risk
weighted
assets) |
261,835 |
12.83 |
|
163,247 |
8.0% |
|
$204,058 |
10.00% |
Tier
I risk-based capital (to risk
weighted
assets) |
246,292 |
12.07 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
122,435 |
6.00 |
Tier
I leverage capital (to average assets) |
256,955 |
7.82 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
163,123 |
5.00 |
|
Actual |
|
For
Capital
Adequacy
Purposes |
|
To
Be Categorized as "Well Capitalized" |
As
of December 31, 2003 |
Amount |
Ratio |
|
Amount |
Ratio |
|
Amount |
Ratio |
Tangible
capital |
$231,096 |
7.97% |
|
$43,492 |
1.5% |
|
N/A |
N/A |
Leverage
capital |
231,096 |
7.97 |
|
115,979 |
4.0 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
Total
risk-based capital (to risk
weighted
assets) |
240,809 |
15.03 |
|
128,144 |
8.0 |
|
$160,180 |
10.00% |
Tier
I risk-based capital (to risk
weighted
assets) |
225,791 |
14.43 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
96,108 |
6.00 |
Tier
I leverage capital (to average assets) |
231,096 |
7.55 |
|
N/A |
N/A |
|
152,980 |
5.00 |
The
following is a reconciliation of GAAP capital to regulatory capital for the
Bank:
|
At
December 31, 2004 |
|
At
December 31, 2003 |
|
Tangible
Capital |
Leverage
Capital |
Risk-Based
Capital |
|
Tangible
Capital |
Leverage
Capital |
Risk-Based
Capital |
GAAP
capital |
$309,190 |
$309,190 |
$309,190 |
|
$286,620 |
$286,620 |
$286,620 |
Non-allowable
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core
deposit intangible |
(48) |
(48) |
(48) |
|
(873) |
(873) |
(873) |
Loan
servicing asset |
(250) |
(250) |
(250) |
|
(227) |
(227) |
(227) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive income |
3,701 |
3,701 |
3,701 |
|
1,214 |
1,214 |
1,214 |
Goodwill |
(55,638) |
(55,638) |
(55,638) |
|
(55,638) |
(55,638) |
(55,638) |
Adjustment
for recourse provision on loans sold |
- |
- |
(10,663) |
|
- |
- |
(5,305) |
Tier
1 risk-based capital |
256,955 |
256,955 |
246,292 |
|
231,096 |
231,096 |
225,791 |
General
valuation allowance |
- |
- |
15,543 |
|
- |
- |
15,018 |
Total
risk-based capital |
256,955 |
256,955 |
261,835 |
|
231,096 |
231,096 |
240,809 |
Minimum
capital requirement |
48,937 |
130,498 |
163,247 |
|
43,492 |
115,979 |
128,144 |
Regulatory
capital excess |
$208,018 |
$126,457 |
$98,588 |
|
$187,604 |
$115,117 |
$112,665 |
20.
CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR END
Effective
July 1, 2002, the Company and Bank changed their fiscal years from a twelve
month period ending June 30th to a
twelve month period ending December 31st. The
Company's consolidated financial statements include the six-month transition
period from July 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002.
The
following table presents certain financial information for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the unaudited year ended December 31, 2002,
information for the six month transition period ended December 31, 2002, and the
unaudited six-months ended December 31, 2001.
|
Year
Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
2002
(Unaudited) |
|
2002 |
2001
(Unaudited) |
Total
interest income |
$163,621 |
$169,115 |
$181,914 |
|
$90,469 |
$93,136 |
Total
interest expense |
67,776 |
71,063 |
91,790 |
|
43,278 |
53,732 |
Net
interest income |
95,845 |
98,052 |
90,124 |
|
47,191 |
39,404 |
Provision
for loan losses |
280 |
288 |
240 |
|
120 |
120 |
Total
non-interest income |
20,513 |
25,122 |
19,999 |
|
10,765 |
5,603 |
Total
non-interest expense |
42,407 |
40,809 |
38,696 |
|
20,368 |
17,103 |
Income
before income taxes |
73,671 |
82,077 |
71,187 |
|
37,468 |
27,784 |
Income
tax expense |
27,449 |
30,801 |
26,565 |
|
14,008 |
10,269 |
Net
income |
$46,222 |
$51,276 |
$44,622 |
|
$23,460 |
$17,515 |
Earnings
per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$1.31 |
$1.43 |
$1.23 |
|
$0.65 |
$0.49 |
Diluted |
1.28 |
1.37 |
1.17 |
|
0.62 |
0.47 |
Weighted
average basic shares outstanding |
35,318,858 |
35,922,777 |
36,312,153 |
|
36,287,111 |
35,397,116 |
Weighted
average diluted shares outstanding |
36,212,000 |
37,350,257 |
38,008,592 |
|
37,864,188 |
37,426,050 |
Dividends
declared per common share |
$0.55 |
$0.41 |
$0.29 |
|
$0.16 |
$0.12 |
21.
UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The
following represents the unaudited consolidated results of operations for each
of the quarters during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
six months ended December 31, 2002, and the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002.
For
the three months ended |
March
31,
2004 |
June
30,
2004 |
September
30,
2004 |
December
31,
2004 |
Net
interest income |
$24,116 |
$23,874 |
$24,053 |
$23,802 |
Provision
for loan losses |
60 |
60 |
60 |
100 |
Net
interest income after
provision
for loan losses |
24,056 |
23,814 |
23,993 |
23,702 |
Non-interest
income |
5,617 |
6,732 |
4,498 |
3,666 |
Non-interest
expense |
10,365 |
10,552 |
10,490 |
11,000 |
Income
before income taxes |
19,308 |
19,994 |
18,001 |
16,368 |
Income
tax expense |
6,968 |
7,588 |
6,755 |
6,138 |
Net
income |
$12,340 |
$12,406 |
$11,246 |
$10,230 |
Earnings
per share (1): |
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.35 |
$0.35 |
$0.32 |
$0.29 |
Diluted |
$0.33 |
$0.34 |
$0.31 |
$0.29 |
For
the three months ended |
March
31,
2003 |
June
30,
2003 |
September
30,
2003 |
December
31,
2003 |
Net
interest income |
$26,269 |
$25,604 |
$25,480 |
$20,699 |
Provision
for loan losses |
60 |
60 |
88 |
80 |
Net
interest income after
provision
for loan losses |
26,209 |
25,544 |
25,392 |
20,619 |
Non-interest
income |
5,365 |
4,754 |
9,406 |
5,597 |
Non-interest
expense |
9,669 |
9,696 |
9,769 |
11,675 |
Income
before income taxes |
21,905 |
20,602 |
25,029 |
14,541 |
Income
tax expense |
8,268 |
8,005 |
9,857 |
4,671 |
Net
income |
$13,637 |
$12,597 |
$15,172 |
$9,870 |
Earnings
per share (1): |
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.38 |
$0.35 |
$0.43 |
$0.27 |
Diluted |
$0.37 |
$0.34 |
$0.41 |
$0.27 |
For
the three months ended |
September
30, 2002 |
December
31, 2002 |
Net
interest income |
$24,223 |
$22,968 |
Provision
for loan losses |
60 |
60 |
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses |
24,163 |
22,908 |
Non-interest
income |
3,490 |
7,275 |
Non-interest
expense |
10,127 |
10,241 |
Income
before income taxes |
17,526 |
19,942 |
Income
tax expense |
6,598 |
7,410 |
Net
income |
$10,928 |
$12,532 |
Earnings
per share (1): |
|
|
Basic
|
$0.30 |
$0.35 |
Diluted |
$0.29 |
$0.33 |
For
the three months ended |
September
30,
2001 |
December
31,
2001 |
March
31,
2002 |
June
30,
2002 |
Net
interest income |
$18,956 |
$20,448 |
$22,050 |
$20,883 |
Provision
for loan losses |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
Net
interest income after
provision
for loan losses |
18,896 |
20,388 |
21,990 |
20,823 |
Non-interest
income |
2,587 |
3,016 |
3,212 |
6,022 |
Non-interest
expense |
8,322 |
8,781 |
8,886 |
9,442 |
Income
before income taxes |
13,161 |
14,623 |
16,316 |
17,403 |
Income
tax expense |
4,837 |
5,432 |
6,161 |
6,396 |
Net
income |
$8,324 |
$9,191 |
$10,155 |
$11,007 |
Earnings
per share (1): |
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.23 |
$0.26 |
$0.28 |
$0.30 |
Diluted |
$0.22 |
$0.25 |
$0.27 |
$0.29 |
(1) The
quarterly earnings per share amounts, when added, may not coincide with the full
fiscal year earnings per share reported on the Consolidated Statement of
Operations due to differences in the computed weighted average shares
outstanding as well as rounding differences.
22.
CONDENSED PARENT COMPANY ONLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
following statements of condition as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related statements of operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, the six months ended December 31, 2002 and the year ended June
30, 2002, reflect the Holding Company's investment in its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, the Bank and 842 Manhattan Avenue Corp., using the equity method
of accounting:
DIME
COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
At
December 31, |
At
December 31, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
ASSETS: |
|
|
Cash
and due from banks |
$962 |
$896 |
Investment
securities available-for-sale |
18,886 |
7,936 |
Mortgage-backed
securities available-for-sale |
3,341 |
5,166 |
Federal
funds sold and short term investments |
36,951 |
3,753 |
ESOP
loan to subsidiary |
4,749 |
5,202 |
Investment
in subsidiaries |
309,492 |
286,913 |
Other
assets |
6,818 |
587 |
Total
assets |
$381,199 |
$310,453 |
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: |
|
|
Subordinated
notes payable |
$25,000 |
$25,000 |
Trust
Preferred securities payable |
72,165 |
- |
Other
liabilities |
2,313 |
1,534 |
Stockholders'
equity |
281,721 |
283,919 |
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity |
$381,199 |
$310,453 |
DIME
COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
June
30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Net
interest loss |
$(5,054) |
$(1,308) |
|
$(473) |
|
$(654) |
Dividends
received from Bank |
30,000 |
35,000 |
|
15,000 |
|
13,500 |
Non-interest
income |
377 |
1 |
|
- |
|
2,015 |
Non-interest
expense |
(638) |
(701) |
|
(528) |
|
(741) |
Income
before income taxes and equity in
undistributed earnings of direct subsidiaries |
24,685 |
32,992 |
|
13,999 |
|
14,120 |
Income
tax credit (expense) |
2,373 |
697 |
|
458 |
|
(240) |
Income
before equity in undistributed earnings
of direct subsidiaries |
27,058 |
33,689 |
|
14,457 |
|
13,880 |
Equity
in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries |
19,164 |
17,587 |
|
9,003 |
|
24,797 |
Net
income |
$46,222 |
$51,276 |
|
$23,460 |
|
$38,677 |
DIME
COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Fiscal
Year Ended
December
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended
December
31, |
|
Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, |
|
2004 |
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2002 |
Cash
flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income |
$46,222 |
$51,276 |
|
$23,460 |
|
$38,677 |
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
in undistributed earnings of direct subsidiaries |
(19,164) |
(17,587) |
|
(9,003) |
|
(24,797) |
Gain
on sale of assets |
(258) |
- |
|
- |
|
(2,004) |
Net
(amortization) accretion of (premium) discount
on securities available-for-sale |
(432) |
6 |
|
15 |
|
91 |
Decrease
(Increase) in other assets |
(6,231) |
585 |
|
(137) |
|
151 |
Increase
(Decrease) in other liabilities |
700 |
584 |
|
224 |
|
(19) |
Net
cash provided by operating activities |
20,837 |
34,864 |
|
14,559 |
|
12,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase)
Decrease in federal funds sold and short-term
investments |
(33,198) |
(996) |
|
(868) |
|
9,156 |
Proceeds
from sale of investment securities available-for-sale |
2,959 |
- |
|
- |
|
4,582 |
Proceeds
from transfer of securities |
- |
270 |
|
243 |
|
- |
Purchases
of investment securities available-for-sale |
(12,999) |
(323) |
|
(319) |
|
(1,196) |
Principal
repayments on mortgage-backed securities
available-for-sale |
1,790 |
3,873 |
|
2,775 |
|
12,726 |
Principal
repayments on ESOP loan |
453 |
459 |
|
467 |
|
474 |
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(40,995) |
3,283 |
|
2,298 |
|
25,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock |
9 |
8 |
|
4 |
|
10 |
Cash
disbursed in payment of stock dividend |
(12) |
- |
|
- |
|
(17) |
Decrease
in securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
- |
- |
|
(2,000) |
|
(19,325) |
Proceeds
from issuance of trust preferred securities |
72,165 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Common
stock issued for exercise of stock options and tax
benefits of RRP shares |
4,007 |
5,316 |
|
2,439 |
|
6,689 |
Cash
dividends paid to stockholders |
(19,743) |
(15,801) |
|
(6,205) |
|
(9,867) |
Purchase
of treasury stock |
(38,198) |
(26,828) |
|
(11,769) |
|
(14,690) |
Benefit
plan payments reimbursed by Subsidiary |
1,996 |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
20,224 |
(37,305) |
|
(17,531) |
|
(37,200) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks |
66 |
842 |
|
(674) |
|
641 |
Cash
and due from banks, beginning of period |
896 |
54 |
|
728 |
|
87 |
Cash
and due from banks, end of period |
$962 |
$896 |
|
$54 |
|
$728 |
* * * *
*
EXHIBITS
------------
3(i) |
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Dime Community Bancshares,
Inc. (1) |
3(ii) |
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(1) |
4.1 |
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Dime Community Bancshares,
Inc. [See Exhibit 3(i) hereto] |
4.2 |
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. [See Exhibit 3(ii)
hereto] |
4.3 |
|
Draft
Stock Certificate of Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(2) |
4.4 |
|
Certificate
of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock (3) |
4.5 |
|
Rights
Agreement, dated as of April 9, 1998, between Dime Community Bancorp, Inc.
and ChaseMellon Shareholder
Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent (3) |
4.6 |
|
Form
of Rights Certificate (3) |
4.7
|
|
Second
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of July 29, 2004, by
and among Wilmington Trust
Company, as Delaware Trustee, Wilmington Trust Company as Institutional
Trustee, Dime Community Bancshares,
Inc., as Sponsor, the Administrators of Dime Community Capital Trust I and
the holders from time to time of undivided
beneficial interests in the assets of Dime Community Capital Trust I
(8) |
4.8
|
|
Indenture,
dated as of March 19, 2004, between Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. and
Wilmington Trust Company, as
trustee (8) |
4.9
|
|
Series
B Guarantee Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2004, executed and delivered
by Dime Community Bancshares,
Inc., as Guarantor and Wilmington Trust Company, as Guarantee Trustee, for
the benefit of the holders from time to
time of the Series B Capital Securities of Dime Community Capital Trust I
(8) |
10.1 |
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement between The Dime Savings Bank of
Williamsburgh and Vincent F.
Palagiano (4) |
10.2 |
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement between The Dime Savings Bank of
Williamsburgh and Michael P.
Devine (4) |
10.3 |
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement between The Dime Savings Bank of
Williamsburgh and
Kenneth J. Mahon (4) |
10.4 |
|
Employment
Agreement between Dime Community Bancorp, Inc. and Vincent F. Palagiano
(9) |
10.5 |
|
Employment
Agreement between Dime Community Bancorp, Inc. and Michael P. Devine
(9) |
10.6 |
|
Employment
Agreement between Dime Community Bancorp, Inc. and Kenneth J. Mahon
(9) |
10.7 |
|
Form
of Employee Retention Agreement by and among The Dime Savings Bank of
Williamsburgh, Dime Community
Bancorp, Inc. and certain officers (4) |
10.8 |
|
The
Benefit Maintenance Plan of Dime Community Bancorp, Inc.
(5) |
10.9 |
|
Severance
Pay Plan of The Dime Savings Bank of Williamsburgh (4) |
10.10 |
|
Retirement
Plan for Board Members of Dime Community Bancorp, Inc.
(5) |
10.11 |
|
Dime
Community Bancorp, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors,
Officers and Employees, as amended
by amendments number 1 and 2 (5) |
10.12 |
|
Recognition
and Retention Plan for Outside Directors, Officers and Employees of Dime
Community Bancorp, Inc., as
amended by amendments number 1 and 2 (5) |
10.13 |
|
Form
of stock option agreement for Outside Directors under Dime Community
Bancshares, Inc. 1996 and 2001
Stock Option Plans for Outside Directors, Officers and Employees.
(5) |
10.14 |
|
Form
of stock option agreement for officers and employees under Dime Community
Bancshares, Inc. 1996 and 2001
Stock Option Plans for Outside Directors, Officers and Employees
(5) |
10.15 |
|
Form
of award notice for outside directors under the Recognition and Retention
Plan for Outside Directors, Officers
and Employees of Dime Community Bancorp, Inc. (5) |
10.16 |
|
Form
of award notice for officers and employees under the Recognition and
Retention Plan for Outside Directors,
Officers and Employees of Dime Community Bancorp, Inc.
(5) |
10.17 |
|
Financial
Federal Savings Bank Incentive Savings Plan in RSI Retirement Trust
(6) |
10.18 |
|
Financial
Federal Savings Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (6) |
10.19 |
|
Option
Conversion Certificates between Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. and each
of Messrs: Russo, Segrete,
Calamari, Latawiec, O'Gorman, and Ms. Swaya pursuant to Section 1.6(b) of
the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of July 18, 1998 by and between Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
and Financial Bancorp, Inc. (6) |
10.20 |
|
Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors,
Officers and Employees (7) |
10.21 |
|
Dime
Community Bancshares, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan for Outside
Directors, Officers and Employees |
14 |
|
Code
of Business Ethics |
21 |
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant |
31.1 |
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 17 CFR
240.13a-14(a) |
31.2 |
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 17 CFR
240.13a-14(a) |
32.1 |
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350. |
32.2 |
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350. |
(1) Incorporated
by reference to the registrant's Transition Report on Form 10-K for the
transition period ended December 31, 2002 filed on March 28, 2003.
(2) Incorporated
by reference to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1998 filed on September 28, 1998.
(3) Incorporated
by reference to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 9, 1998
and filed on April 16, 1998.
(4) Incorporated
by reference to Exhibits to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 1997 filed on September 26, 1997.
(5) Incorporated
by reference to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 1997 filed on September 26, 1997.
(6) Incorporated
by reference to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2000 filed on September 28, 2000.
(7) Incorporated
by reference to the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003 filed on November 14, 2003.
(8) Incorporated
by reference to Exhibits to the registrant’s Registration Statement No.
333-117743 on Form S-4 filed on July 29, 2004.
(9) Incorporated
by reference to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2003 filed on March 15, 2004.