FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
Annual report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
Commission file number: 000-28635
Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia 54-1964895
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)
5350 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22207
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number: 703.534.0700
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $1.00 par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant; (1) filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (ss.229.405 of this chapter) is not contained in this form,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer.
Yes [ ] No [X]
The registrant's Common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the
symbol VCBI. The aggregate market value of the approximately 2,449,902 shares of
Common Stock of the registrant issued and outstanding held by nonaffiliates on
June 30, 2002 was approximately $64.8 million, based on the closing sales price
of $26.45 per share on that date. For purposes of this calculation the term
"affiliate" refers to all directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders of
the registrant.
As of the close of business on March 1, 2003, 3,818,979 shares of the
registrant's Common Stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting
of Shareholders, to be held on April 30, 2003 are incorporated by reference in
part III hereof.
FORM 10-K CROSS REFERENCE OF MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The following shows the location in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or the
Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
April 30, 2003, of the information required to be disclosed by the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-K. References to pages only are to
pages in this report.
PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS. See "Business" on Pages 44 through 53.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES. See "Properties" on Page 53
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. From time to time the Company is a
participant in various legal proceedings incidental to its
business. In the opinion of management, the liabilities (if
any) resulting from such legal proceeding will not have a
material effect on the financial position of the Company.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. No
matter was submitted to a vote of the security holders of
the Company during the fourth quarter of 2002.
PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. See "Market Price of Stock and
Dividends" on Page 18.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. See "Five Year Financial Summary"
on Page 3.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATION. See "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation" on
Pages 4 through 18.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
See "Asset/Liability Management and Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk" on Page 8.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. See
Consolidated Financial Statements at Pages 20 through 43.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. None.
PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT. The
information required by Item 10 is hereby incorporated
herein by reference from the material under the caption
"Election of Directors" contained on pages 4 through 7, and
under the caption "Compliance with Section 16(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934" on page 16, of the
Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on April 30, 2003.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. The information required by Item 11
is hereby incorporated herein by reference from the material
under the caption "Executive Officer Compensation and
Certain Transactions," contained on pages 7 through 13 of
the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on April 30, 2003.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT. The information required by Item 12 is hereby
incorporated herein by reference from the material under the
captions "Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof"
contained on pages 3 and 4 of the Company's Proxy Statement
for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April
30, 2003, and under the caption "Securities Authorized for
Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans" at page 10 of the
Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. The
information required by Item 13 is hereby incorporated
herein by reference from the material under the caption
"Transactions with Management and Others" contained on page
11 of the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting
of Stockholders to be held on April 30, 2003.
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. See "Controls and Procedures" at
Page 53.
PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM
8-K. See "Financial Statements, Exhibits and Reports on Form
8-K" at Page 54.
2
FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Year Ended December 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000 1999 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousand, except per share amounts)
SELECTED YEAR-END BALANCES
Total assets $ 662,887 $ 489,511 $ 371,182 $ 282,575 $ 222,442
Total stockholders' equity 41,850 26,220 21,166 17,489 15,832
Total loans (net) 535,848 410,950 305,717 205,171 149,440
Total deposits 566,996 406,922 310,934 243,044 188,743
SUMMARY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Interest income $ 38,998 $ 33,897 $ 26,776 $ 18,851 $ 15,266
Interest expense 14,128 15,991 12,861 8,679 7,511
Net interest income $ 24,870 $ 17,906 $ 13,915 $ 10,172 $ 7,755
Provision for loan losses 1,678 1,572 947 480 451
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses $ 23,192 $ 16,334 $ 12,968 $ 9,692 $ 7,304
Non-interest income 5,593 4,704 2,599 1,999 632
Non-interest expense 17,217 13,982 10,636 8,397 5,648
Income before taxes $ 11,568 $ 7,056 $ 4,931 $ 3,294 $ 2,288
Income tax expense 3,892 2,391 1,681 1,128 784
Net income $ 7,676 $ 4,665 $ 3,250 $ 2,166 $ 1,504
PER SHARE DATA (1)
Net income, basic $ 2.16 $ 1.38 $ 0.96 $ 0.64 $ 0.45
Net income, diluted $ 1.92 $ 1.26 $ 0.91 $ 0.61 $ 0.43
Book value $ 11.19 $ 7.71 $ 6.26 $ 5.17 $ 4.69
Average number of shares outstanding 3,559,757 3,389,189 3,383,398 3,381,375 3,306,750
GROWTH AND SIGNIFICANT RATIOS
% Change in net income 64.54 % 43.54 % 50.06 % 44.04 % 32.78 %
% Change in assets 35.42 % 31.88 % 31.36 % 27.03 % 34.72 %
% Change in loans 30.39 % 34.42 % 49.01 % 37.29 % 48.08 %
% Change in deposits 39.34 % 30.87 % 27.93 % 28.77 % 32.52 %
% Change in equity 59.61 % 23.88 % 21.02 % 10.47 % 40.44 %
Equity to asset ratio 6.31 % 5.36 % 5.70 % 6.19 % 7.12 %
Return on average assets 1.32 % 1.05 % 1.00 % 0.87 % 0.75 %
Return on average equity 23.06 % 19.37 % 17.04 % 13.03 % 10.37 %
Average equity to average assets 5.71 % 5.44 % 5.87 % 6.65 % 7.25 %
Efficiency ratio (2) 56.52 % 61.84 % 64.41 % 68.89 % 67.35 %
(1) Adjusted for all years presented giving retroactive effect to a 10% stock
dividend in 2000, 10% stock restructurings in 1998 and 1999, and five for
four stock splits in the form of 25% stock dividends in 2001and 2002.
(2) Computed by dividing non-interest expense by the sum of net interest
income on a tax equivalent basis and non-interest income, net of
securities gains or losses. This is a non-GAAP financial measure, which
we believe provides investors with important information regarding our
operational efficiency. Comparison of our efficiency ratio with those of
other companies may not be possible, because other companies may
calculate the efficiency ratio differently.
3
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This management's discussion and analysis and other portions of this report,
contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements of goals, intentions, and
expectations as to future trends, plans, events or results of Company operations
and policies and regarding general economic conditions. In some cases,
forward-looking statements can be identified by use of words such as "may,"
"will," "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "plans," "estimates," "potential,"
"continue," "should," and similar words or phrases. These statements are based
upon current and anticipated economic conditions, nationally and in the
Company's market, interest rates and interest rate policy, competitive factors,
and other conditions which by their nature, are not susceptible to accurate
forecast, and are subject to significant uncertainty. Because of these
uncertainties and the assumptions on which this discussion and the
forward-looking statements are based, actual future operations and results in
the future may differ materially from those indicated herein. Readers are
cautioned against placing undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements.
The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements to
reflect occurrences or events that may not have been anticipated as of the date
of such statements.
GENERAL
The following presents management's discussion and analysis of the consolidated
financial condition and results of operations of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of the dates and for the periods indicated.
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's Consolidated
Financial Statements and the Notes thereto, and other financial data appearing
elsewhere in this report. The Company is the parent bank holding company for
Virginia Commerce Bank (the "Bank"), a Virginia state chartered bank that offers
a full range of banking services through thirteen offices, principally to
individuals and small to medium-size businesses in the Metropolitan Washington,
DC area.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company's financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The financial
information contained within our statements is, to a significant extent,
financial information that is based on measures of the financial effects of
transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could
affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income,
recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. We use
historical loss factors as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may
be present in our loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from
the historical factors that we use. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one
previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of our
transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact our
transactions could change.
The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained
in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of
accounting: (i) SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies, which requires that losses
be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimatable and (ii) SFAS
114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, which requires that
losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral,
present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the
secondary market and the loan balance.
Our allowance for loan losses has three basic components: the specific
allowance, the formula allowance and the unallocated allowance. Each of these
components is determined based upon estimates that can and do change when the
actual events occur. The specific allowance is used to individually allocate an
allowance for loans identified for impairment testing. Impairment testing
includes consideration of the borrower's overall financial condition, resources
and payment record, support available from financial guarantors and the fair
market value of collateral. These factors are combined to estimate the
probability and severity of inherent losses. When impairment is identified, then
a specific reserve is established based on the Company's calculation of the loss
embedded in the individual loan. Large groups of smaller balance, homogeneous
loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does
not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for
impairment. The formula allowance is used for estimating the loss on internally
risk rated loans exclusive of those identified for impairment testing. The loans
meeting the criteria for special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss, as
well as, impaired loans are segregated from performing loans within the
portfolio. Internally classified loans are then grouped by loan type
(commercial, commercial real estate, commercial construction, residential real
4
estate, residential construction or installment). Each loan type is assigned an
allowance factor based on management's estimate of the associated risk,
complexity and size of the individual loans within the particular loan category.
Classified loans are assigned a higher allowance factor than non-rated loans due
to management's concerns regarding collectibility or management's knowledge of
particular elements surrounding the borrower. Allowance factors grow with the
worsening of the internal risk rating. The unallocated formula is used to
estimate the loss of non-classified loans and loans identified for impairment
testing for which no impairment was identified. These un-criticized loans are
also segregated by loan type and allowance factors are assigned by management
based on delinquencies, loss history, trends in volume and terms of loans,
effects of changes in lending policy, the experience and depth of management,
national and local economic trends, concentrations of credit, quality of the
loan review system and the effect of external factors (i.e. competition and
regulatory requirements). The factors assigned differ by loan type. The
unallocated allowance captures losses whose impact on the portfolio have
occurred but have yet to be recognized in either the formula or specific
allowance. Allowance factors and the overall size of the allowance may change
from period to period based on management's assessment of the above described
factors and the relative weights given to each factor. For further information
regarding the allowance for loan losses see Notes 1 and 4 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements and the discussion under the caption "Asset Quality -
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses" at page 10.
OVERVIEW
In 2002, the Company experienced record growth in assets, deposits and net
income. Total assets increased 35.4% from $489.5 million at December 31, 2001 to
$662.9 million at December 31, 2002, total deposits increased 39.3% from $406.9
million to $567.0 million over the same period and net income increased $3.0
million, or 64.5%, from $4.7 million in 2001 to $7.7 million in 2002. While the
increase in deposits was the main driver of the record asset growth, the Company
provided additional funding of $7.0 million through a pre-emptive rights
offering to existing stockholders in July 2002, and $18.0 million through the
issuance of trust preferred securities in the fourth quarter. In 2001, total
assets increased 31.9% from $371.2 million at December 31, 2000 to $489.5
million at December 31, 2002, deposits increased 30.9% from $310.9 million to
$406.9 million and net income increased by $1.4 million, or 43.5%, from $3.3
million to $4.7 million.
Loan growth was also strong in 2002 as loans, net of allowance for loan losses,
increased 30.4% from $410.9 million at December 31, 2001 to $535.8 million at
December 31, 2002. Growth occurred in three of the four major classifications of
loans with growth in real estate mortgage loans representing the largest
increase, rising $105.9 million, or 38.5%, from $275.1 million at December 31,
2001 to $381.0 million at December 31, 2002. Real estate construction loans
represented the second largest increase with growth of $16.8 million, or 17.9%,
from $94.5 million at December 31, 2001 to $111.3 million at December 31, 2002
while commercial loans, the third category in which growth occurred, rose $5.4
million, or 13.8%, from $39.2 million at December 31, 2001 to $44.6 million at
December 31, 2002. Loan growth in 2001 was similar to that achieved in 2002,
with loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, increasing 34.4% from $305.7
million at December 31, 2000 to $410.9 million at December 31, 2001. Growth by
category was also similar with real estate mortgage loans increasing $76.6
million, real estate construction loans increasing by $29.0 million and
commercial loans rising $1.7 million.
As the Company experienced record growth in deposits and provided additional
funding through its rights offering and issuance of trust preferred securities
in 2002, other borrowed money and repurchase agreements declined. Repurchase
agreements, which are provided to numerous demand deposit customers of the bank,
fell $10.4 million, or 24.4%, from $42.5 million at December 31, 2001 to $32.1
million at December 31, 2002. Other borrowed money, which includes the Company's
line of credit with a correspondent bank was paid down $11.0 million from $11.4
million at December 31, 2001 to $400 thousand at December 31, 2002. In 2001,
repurchase agreements increased $13.4 million, or 45.9%, from $29.1 million to
$42.5 million and other borrowed funds increased $4.0 million from $7.4 million
at December 31, 2000 to $11.4 million at December 31, 2001. Both the $4.0
million increase in other borrowed funds in 2001 and the $11.0 million decline
in 2002 were associated with the Company's use of its line-of-credit with a
correspondent bank for supplementing the Bank's capital position. With the
Company's successful completion of its $7.0 million rights offering in July 2002
and its issuance of $18.0 million in trust preferred securities in the fourth
quarter of the year, the Company was able to repay the entire outstanding
balance on the line-of-credit of $11.0 million while maintaining strong capital
levels at the Bank.
5
While the growth in loans utilized the majority of the Company's cash from
financing activities, cash and cash equivalents increased $28.8 million, or
190.2%, from $15.2 million at December 31, 2001 to $44.0 million at December 31,
2002 and investment securities, which are maintained as additional liquidity
sources and for various collateral needs, increased $18.2 million, or 34.4% from
$53.0 million at December 31, 2001 to $71.2 million at December 31, 2002. In
2001, cash and cash equivalents increased $4.2 million from $11.0 million at
December 31, 2000 to $15.2 million at December 31, 2001 and investment
securities increased over the same period $7.8 million, or 17.2%, from $45.3
million to $53.0 million.
By category, deposit growth in 2002 included a $32.1 million, or 48.3%, increase
in non-interest-bearing demand deposits from $66.4 million at December 31, 2001
to $98.6 million at December 31, 2002, a $58.0 million, or 43.7%, increase in
savings and interest-bearing demand deposits and a $69.9 million, or 33.7%
increase in time deposits from $207.7 million at December 31, 2001 to $277.6
million at December 31, 2002. In 2001, deposit growth included an $11.5 million
increase in non-interest-bearing demand deposits, a $28.9 million increase in
savings and interest-bearing demand deposits, and a $55.5 million increase in
time deposits. The majority of the Bank's deposits are attracted from
individuals and businesses in the Northern Virginia and the Metropolitan,
Washington DC area.
Earnings for 2002 of $7.7 million increased $3.0 million, or 64.5%, compared to
earnings of $4.7 million in 2001 as net interest income increased $7.0 million,
or 38.9%, non-interest income rose $889 thousand, or 18.9%, while non-interest
expense, as a percentage of total net interest and non-interest income fell from
61.8% in 2001 to 56.5% in 2002. In 2001, earnings of $4.7 million represented an
increase of 43.5% compared to earnings of $3.3 million in 2000 and earnings in
2000 of $3.3 million increased 50.1% compared to earnings of $2.2 million in
1999. On a diluted per share basis earnings were $1.92, $1.26, and $0.91 in
2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. The Company's return on average assets was
1.32% for 2002, as compared to 1.05% in 2001 and 1.00% in 2000. Return on
average equity increased to 23.06% in 2002, as compared to 19.37% in 2001, and
17.04% in 2000.
Stockholders' equity increased $15.7 million from $26.2 million at December 31,
2001 to $41.9 million at December 31, 2002 with earnings of $7.7 million, $7.0
million in net proceeds from the rights offering, $493 thousand from the
exercise of stock options and warrants, and a $510 thousand increase in other
comprehensive income, net of tax. In 2001, stockholders' equity grew $5.0
million from $21.2 million at December 31, 2000 to $26.2 million at year-end
2001 due to earnings of $4.7 million, $97 thousand from the exercise of stock
options and a $295 thousand increase in other comprehensive income, net of tax.
The total number of common shares outstanding increased in 2002 by 1,018,514
with 679,955 shares issued due to a five for four stock split in the form of a
twenty five percent stock dividend in March 2002, 291,738 shares issued in July
2002 in connection with the rights offering and 46,821 shares issued as a result
of the exercise of stock options and warrants.
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the excess of interest earned on loans and investments
over the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. The Company's net interest
income increased $7.0 million, or 38.9%, from $17.9 million in 2001 to $24.9
million in 2002 with $6.2 million of the increase due to growth in earning
assets and $794 thousand of the increase due to a twenty-four basis point
increase in the net interest margin. In 2001 net interest income increased $4.0
million, or 28.7%, from $13.9 million in 2000 to $17.9 million in 2001, with
$4.7 million in additional net interest income due to growth in earning assets,
offset by a decline in net interest income of $729 thousand due to a thirty-one
basis point drop in the net interest margin. In 2000, net interest income
increased $3.7 million, or 36.3%, from $10.2 million in 1999 to $13.9 million.
Following Federal Reserve interest rate reductions of 475 basis points during
2001, loans, the majority of which were floating or variable rate, and
investment securities, the majority of which were callable agency issues,
re-priced faster than interest-bearing liabilities, the majority of which were
time deposits with an average maturity of eighteen to twenty-four months. As a
result the average yield on earning assets fell seventy-two basis points from
8.73% in 2000 to 8.01% in 2001, while the average cost of interest bearing
liabilities dropped fifty-two basis points from 5.00% in 2000 to 4.48% in 2001.
This narrowed the margin on earning assets from 4.54% in 2000 to 4.23% in 2001.
In 2002, as the structure of the Bank's loans and investment securities remained
relatively unchanged, they continued to re-price downward with the average yield
on earning assets falling one hundred basis points from 8.01% in 2001 to 7.01%
for 2002; however, the cost of interest bearing liabilities, and time deposits
in particular, fell more significantly, with the cost of interest bearing
liabilities falling one hundred and forty-one basis points from 4.48% in 2001 to
3.07% in 2002. With expectations that interest rates will remain low in 2003,
the majority of time deposits having re-priced in 2002, other interest-bearing
deposits at very low rates, and with growth in the loan and investment
securities portfolio in 2003 at interest rates lower than the portfolio's
current average rates the Company anticipates that its net interest margin may
be slightly lower in 2003.
6
TABLE 1: AVERAGE BALANCES, INCOME AND EXPENSE, YIELDS AND RATES
The following table shows the average balance sheets for each of the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000. In addition, the amounts of interest earned
on earning assets, with related yields, and interest expense on interest-bearing
liabilities, with related rates, are shown. Loans placed on a non-accrual status
are included in the average balances. Net loan fees and late charges included in
interest income on loans totaled $1.6 million, $1.1 million and $702 thousand,
for 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.
2002 2001 2000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Average Interest Average Interest Average
Average Income- Yields Average Income- Yields Average Income- Yields
(Dollars in thousands) Balance Expense /Rates Balance Expense /Rates Balance Expense /Rates
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSETS
Securities (1) $ 61,986 $ 3,152 5.14% $ 58,125 $ 3,527 6.07% $ 49,348 $ 3,125 6.33%
Loans, before allowance for losses 471,924 35,491 7.52% 349,586 29,720 8.50% 250,289 23,215 9.28%
Interest-bearing deposits in other
banks -- -- -- -- -- -- 601 36 5.99%
Federal funds sold 22,165 355 1.60% 15,310 650 4.24% 6,377 400 6.27%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL EARNING ASSETS $556,075 $38,998 7.01% $423,021 $33,897 8.01% $306,615 $26,776 8.73%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-earning assets 27,235 19,630 18,457
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ASSETS $583,310 $442,651 $325,072
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Interest-bearing deposits
NOW accounts $ 89,756 $ 1,847 2.06% $ 72,231 $ 2,189 3.03% $ 61,010 $ 2,499 4.10%
Money market accounts 54,144 1,213 2.24% 37,970 1,253 3.30% 23,282 900 3.87%
Savings accounts 16,131 220 1.36% 13,265 318 2.40% 12,771 439 3.44%
Time deposits 255,875 10,061 3.93% 188,968 10,734 5.68% 132,263 7,587 5.74%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total interest-bearing deposits $415,906 $13,341 3.21% $312,434 $14,494 4.64% $229,326 $11,425 4.98%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Securities sold under agreement to
repurchase and federal funds
purchased 33,791 245 0.73% 35,851 976 2.72% 23,537 1,076 4.57%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other borrowed funds 10,109 497 4.91% 8,770 521 5.94% 4,429 360 8.13%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust preferred capital notes 929 45 4.84% -- -- -- -- -- --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES $460,735 $14,128 3.07% $357,055 $15,991 4.48% $257,292 $12,861 5.00%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Demand deposits and other non-
interest bearing liabilities 89,293 61,515 48,703
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES $550,028 $418,570 $305,995
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stockholders' equity 33,282 24,081 19,077
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY $583,310 $442,651 $325,072
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest rate spread 3.94% 3.53% 3.73%
NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN $24,870 4.47% $17,906 4.23% $13,915 4.54%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Yields on securities available-for-sale have been calculated on the basis of
historical cost and do not give effect to changes in the fair value of those
securities, which are reflected as a component of stockholders' equity. Average
yields on securities are stated on a tax equivalent basis.
7
TABLE 2: RATE-VOLUME VARIANCE ANALYSIS
Interest income and expense are affected by changes in interest rates, by
changes in the volumes of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and
by changes in the mix of these assets and liabilities. The following analysis
shows the year-to-year changes in the components of net interest income.
2002 COMPARED TO 2001 2001 COMPARED TO 2000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase/(Decrease) Increase/(Decrease)
Due to Total Due to Total
--------------------- Increase -------------------- Increase
(Dollars in thousands) Volume Rate (Decrease) Volume Rate (Decrease)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTEREST INCOME
Loans $ 9,200 $(3,429) $ 5,771 $ 8,495 $(1,990) $ 6,505
Securities 196 (571) (375) 532 (130) 402
Federal funds sold 110 (405) (295) 384 (134) 250
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks -- -- -- (36) -- (36)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total interest income $ 9,506 $(4,405) $ 5,101 $ 9,375 $(2,254) $ 7,121
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest-bearing deposits:
NOW accounts $ 361 $ (703) $ (342) $ 340 $ (650) $ (310)
Money market accounts 362 (402) (40) 485 (132) 353
Savings accounts 39 (137) (98) 12 (133) (121)
Time deposits 2,480 (3,153) (673) 3,223 (76) 3,147
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total interest-bearing deposits $ 3,242 $(4,395) $(1,153) $ 4,060 $ (991) $ 3,069
Securities sold under agreement to
repurchase and federal funds
purchased (15) (716) (731) 335 (435) (100)
Other borrowed funds 64 (88) (24) 260 (99) 161
Trust preferred capital notes 45 -- 45 -- -- --
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total interest expense $ 3,336 $(5,199) $(1,863) $ 4,655 $(1,525) $ 3,130
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGE IN NET INTEREST INCOME $ 6,170 $ 794 $ 6,964 $ 4,720 $ (729) $ 3,991
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT AND QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to market risk, or
interest rate risk, as its net income is largely dependent on its net interest
income. Market risk is managed by the Company's Asset/Liability Management
Committee that formulates and monitors the performance of the Company based on
established levels of market risk as dictated by policy. In setting tolerance
levels, or limits on market risk, the Committee considers the impact on earnings
and capital, the level and general direction of interest rates, liquidity, local
economic conditions and other factors. Interest rate risk, or interest
sensitivity, can be defined as the amount of forecasted net interest income that
may be gained or lost due to favorable or unfavorable movements in interest
rates. Interest rate risk, or sensitivity, arises when the maturity or
re-pricing of interest-bearing assets differs from the maturing or re-pricing of
interest-bearing liabilities and as a result of the difference between total
interest-bearing assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The Company seeks to
manage interest rate sensitivity while enhancing net interest income by
periodically adjusting this asset/liability position.
One of the tools used by the Company to assess interest sensitivity on a monthly
basis is the static gap analysis that measures the cumulative differences
between the amounts of assets and liabilities maturing or re-pricing within
various time periods. It is the Company's goal to limit the one-year cumulative
difference to plus or minus 10% of total interest-earning assets in an attempt
to limit changes in future net interest income from sudden changes in market
interest rates. A gap analysis is shown in Table 3 below, and reflects the
earlier of the maturity or re-pricing dates for various assets and liabilities
as of December 31, 2002. At that point in time, the Company had a cumulative net
liability sensitive twelve-month gap position of $9.6 million, or a negative
1.5% of total interest-earning assets.
8
This position would generally indicate that earnings should decline in a rising
interest rate environment as more liabilities would re-price than assets;
however, this measurement represents a static position as of a single day and is
not necessarily indicative of the Company's position at any other point in time,
does not take into account the sensitivity of yields and costs of specific
assets and liabilities to changes in market rates, and does not take into
account the specific timing of when changes to a specific asset or liability
will occur. More accurate measures of interest sensitivity are provided to the
Company using earnings simulation models.
TABLE 3: INTEREST SENSITIVITY-GAP ANALYSIS
At December 31, 2002 INTEREST SENSITIVITY PERIODS
------------------------------------------------------------------
Within 91 to 365 Over 1 to 5 Over 5
(Dollars in thousands) 90 Days Days Years Years Total
------------------------------------------------------------------
EARNING ASSETS
Securities, at amortized cost $ 11,710 $ 24,504 $ 17,765 $ 16,220 $ 70,199
Federal funds sold 24,071 -- -- -- 24,071
Loans, net of unearned income 229,995 76,147 217,746 17,884 541,772
------------------------------------------------------------------
Total earning assets $ 265,776 $ 100,651 $ 235,511 $ 34,104 $ 636,042
------------------------------------------------------------------
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES
NOW accounts $ 87,623 $ 6,034 $ 16,170 $ -- $ 109,827
Money market accounts 46,982 9,048 5,972 -- 62,002
Savings accounts 1,519 4,746 12,717 -- 18,982
Time deposits 42,754 126,860 107,983 13 277,610
Securities sold under agreement to
repurchase and federal funds purchased 32,081 -- -- -- 32,081
Other borrowed funds -- 400 -- -- 400
Trust preferred capital notes -- 18,000 -- -- 18,000
------------------------------------------------------------------
Total interest-bearing liabilities $ 210,959 $ 165,088 $ 142,842 $ 13 $ 518,902
------------------------------------------------------------------
CUMULATIVE MATURITY / INTEREST SENSITIVITY
GAP $ 54,817 $ (9,620) $ 83,049 $ 117,140 $ 117,140
As % of total earnings assets 8.6% (1.5)% 13.1% 18.4%
------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to more closely measure interest sensitivity, the Company uses earnings
simulation models on a quarterly basis. These models utilize the Company's
financial data and various management assumptions as to growth and earnings to
forecast a base level of net interest income and earnings over a one-year
period. This base level of earnings is then shocked assuming a sudden 200 basis
points increase or decrease in interest rates. At December 31, 2002, even though
the Company's static gap reflected a liability sensitive position within twelve
months, the model projected that forecasted net income would decrease by 5.1% if
interest rates would immediately fall by 200 basis points as a majority of the
Company's interest-bearing liabilities would not re-price similarly to loans and
investment securities due to their already low rates. If rates were to
immediately rise by 200 basis points, the model projected an increase in net
income of 2.5%. The Company has set a limit on this measurement of interest
sensitivity to a maximum decline in earnings of 20%. Since the earnings model
uses numerous assumptions regarding the effect of changes in interest rates on
the timing and extent of re-pricing characteristics, future cash flows and
customer behavior, the model cannot precisely estimate net income and the effect
on net income from sudden changes in interest rates. Actual results will differ
from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of interest
rate changes and changes in market conditions and management strategies, among
other factors.
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Non-interest income increased $889 thousand, or 18.9%, from $4.7 million in 2001
to $5.6 million in 2002 and increased $2.1 million, or 81.0%, from $2.6 million
in 2000 to $4.7 million in 2001. In 2000, non-interest income increased $600
thousand from $2.0 million in 1999 to $2.6 million in 2000. Fees and net gains
on mortgage loans held-for-sale have accounted for the majority of the increases
over the years with an increase in 2002 of $541 thousand, or 16.0%, from $3.4
million in 2001 to $3.9 million in 2002, and an increase of $1.8 million, or
113.1%, from $1.6 million in 2000 to $3.4 million in 2001. In 2000, fees and net
gains on mortgage loans held-for-sale rose $321 thousand from $1.3 million in
1999 to $1.6 million.
9
The Company's mortgage lending activities began in 1999 and accounted for $1.3
million of the total $2.0 million in non-interest income that year on $73.7
million in mortgages originated for sale. Results in 2000 were similar with fees
and net gains accounting for $1.6 million of the $2.6 million in non-interest
income on $79.8 million in originations. In 2001 and 2002 lower mortgage rates
and a strong local housing market pushed total loans originated for sale to
record levels for the Company with $180.7 million in 2001 and $207.8 million in
2002. Adverse changes in the local real estate market, consumer confidence, and
interest rates could adversely impact the level of loans originated for sale,
and the resulting fees and earnings thereon.
Service charges and other fees, which include monthly deposit account
maintenance charges, overdraft fees, ATM fees and charges, safe deposit box
rents, merchant discount fee income and lock box service fees, increased $359
thousand, or 28.3%, from slightly under $1.3 million in 2001 to $1.6 million in
2002, and increased $291 thousand, or 29.7%, in 2001 from $980 thousand in 2000
to $1.3 million. In 2000, service charges and fees also increased by $291
thousand from $689 thousand in 1999 to $980 thousand. The Company continues to
seek to improve this category of non-interest income having added lock box
services in 2000, insurance services in 2001 and investment services in 2002.
Although these activities have contributed to the increases in service charges
and fees over the past three years, most of the increases in this category of
non-interest income are attributable to growth in total deposit accounts.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
Non-interest expense increased $3.2 million, or 23.1%, from $14.0 million in
2001 to $17.2 million in 2002, and increased $3.3 million, or 31.5%, from $10.6
million in 2000 to $14.0 million in 2001, and increased $2.2 million, or 26.7%,
in 2000. Salaries and benefits accounted for $2.0 million, or 62.7%, of the
total increase in non-interest expense in 2002, $2.3 million, or 69.3% in 2001,
and $1.3 million, or 56.6%, in 2000. Commissions and incentive compensation
associated with the significant increases in total loans and loans originated
for sale were the main reason for these increases in salaries and benefits
expense over the past three years. Also contributing to increased compensation
expenses were other staff increases due to overall growth, branch expansion, and
salary increases for existing staff.
Occupancy expenses, which include rents, depreciation, maintenance on buildings,
leaseholds and equipment, increased $578 thousand, or 24.7%, from $2.3 million
in 2001 to $2.9 million in 2002, and increased $391 thousand and $328 thousand,
or 20.1% and 20.3%, in 2001 and 2000, respectively. These increases are due to
additional facilities for the Company's operations department due to growth and
continued branch expansion, as the Company opened four of its thirteen branches
over the last three years. Data processing costs increased $177 thousand, or
19.6%, from $902 thousand in 2001 to $1.1 million in 2002 and increased $152
thousand and $139 thousand, or 20.3% and 22.8%, in 2001 and 2000, respectively,
due to growth in total loans and deposits and added services such as internet
banking.
Other operating expenses, which include advertising and public relations
expenses, bank franchise taxes, legal and professional fees, supplies and
postage, increased $451 thousand, or 17.3%, from $2.6 million in 2001 to $3.1
million in 2002 and increased $485 thousand, or 22.8%, in 2001 compared to an
increase of $504 thousand, or 31.0%, from $1.6 million in 1999 to $2.1 million
in 2000. Other non-interest expenses to which the Company is not currently
subject, such as deposit insurance premiums, which may be incurred in the
future, could have an adverse affect on earnings and results of operations in
future periods.
INCOME TAXES
The Company's income tax provisions are adjusted for non-deductible expenses and
non-taxable interest after applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 34%.
Provision for income taxes totaled $3.9 million, $2.4 million, and $1.7 million
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. The effects
of non-deductible expenses and non-taxable interest on the Company's income tax
provisions are minimal.
ASSET QUALITY - PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The provision for loan losses is based upon management's estimate of the amount
required to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses reflective of the
risks in the loan portfolio. During 2002, charge-offs totaled $155 thousand
10
compared to $23 thousand and $36 thousand in 2001 and 2000, respectively. The
provision for loan loss expense in 2002 was $1.7 million compared to $1.6
million in 2001 and $947 thousand in 2000. The total allowance for loan losses
of $5.9 million at December 31, 2002 increased 36.0% from $4.4 million at
December 31, 2001, and increased 55.4% from $2.8 million at December 31, 2000 to
$4.4 million at December 31, 2001. Higher provisions in 2002 and 2001, compared
to 2000, reflect significant increases in total loans outstanding, an increase
in non-performing assets from $554 thousand at December 31, 2001 to $2.4 million
at December 31, 2002, and increases in identified other potential problem loans
from $1.2 million at December 31, 2000 to $2.6 million at December 31, 2001 and
$1.9 million at December 31, 2002.
Management feels that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. There can be no
assurance, however, that additional provisions for loan losses will not be
required in the future, including as a result of possible changes in the
economic assumptions underlying management's estimates and judgments, adverse
developments in the economy, on a national basis or in the Company's market
area, or changes in the circumstances of particular borrowers.
The Company generates a quarterly analysis of the allowance for loan losses,
with the objective of quantifying portfolio risk into a dollar figure of
inherent losses, thereby translating the subjective risk value into an objective
number. Emphasis is placed on semi-annual independent external loan reviews and
monthly internal reviews. The determination of the allowance for loan losses is
based on applying and summing the results of eight qualitative factors and one
quantitative factor to each category of loans along with any specific allowance
for impaired and adversely classified loans within the particular category. Each
factor is assigned a percentage weight and that total weight is applied to each
loan category. The resulting sum from each loan category is then combined to
arrive at a total allowance for all categories. Factors are different for each
loan category. Qualitative factors include: levels and trends in delinquencies
and non-accruals, trends in volumes and terms of loans, effects of any changes
in lending policies, the experience, ability and depth of management, national
and local economic trends and conditions, concentrations of credit, quality of
the Company's loan review system, and regulatory requirements. The total
allowance required thus changes as the percentage weight assigned to each factor
is increased or decreased due to its particular circumstance, as the various
types and categories of loans change as a percentage of total loans and as
specific allowances are required due to an increase in impaired and adversely
classified loans. For further information regarding the allowance for loan
losses see Notes 1 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
TABLE 4: PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
(Dollars in thousands) 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998
----------------------------------------------
Allowance, beginning of period $4,356 $2,803 $1,889 $1,438 $ 990
----------------------------------------------
CHARGE-OFFS
Real estate loans $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Commercial loans 87 -- -- -- --
Consumer loans 68 23 36 40 23
----------------------------------------------
Total charge-offs $ 155 $ 23 $ 36 $ 40 $ 23
----------------------------------------------
RECOVERIES
Real estate loans $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ --
Commercial loans 5 2 1 7 3
Consumer loans 40 2 2 4 17
----------------------------------------------
Total recoveries $ 45 $ 4 $ 3 $ 11 $ 20
----------------------------------------------
Net charge-offs $ 110 $ 19 $ 33 $ 29 $ 3
----------------------------------------------
PROVISIONS FOR LOAN LOSSES 1,678 1,572 947 480 451
----------------------------------------------
Allowance, end of period $5,924 $4,356 $2,803 $1,889 $1,438
----------------------------------------------
Ratio of net charges-offs to average total
loans outstanding during period 0.02% 0.01% 0.01% 0.02% 0.003%
----------------------------------------------
11
TABLE 5: ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses is a general allowance applicable to all loan
categories; however, management has allocated the allowance to provide an
indication of the relative risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. The
allocation is an estimate and should not be interpreted as an indication that
charge-offs will occur in these amounts, or that the allocation indicates future
trends. The allocation of the allowance at December 31 for the years indicated
and the ratio of related outstanding loan balances to total loans are as
follows:
(Dollars in thousands) 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998
----------------------------------------------
ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES:
Real estate - mortgage $3,159 $1,957 $1,571 $1,206 $ 870
Real estate - construction 1,239 863 518 132 101
Commercial 1,469 1,482 628 477 409
Consumer 57 54 86 74 58
----------------------------------------------
Balance, December 31, $5,924 $4,356 $2,803 $1,889 $1,438
----------------------------------------------
RATIO OF LOANS TO TOTAL YEAR-END LOANS:
Real estate - mortgage 70% 66% 64% 76% 73%
Real estate - construction 21% 23% 21% 8% 8%
Commercial 8% 9% 12% 13% 16%
Consumer 1% 2% 3% 3% 3%
----------------------------------------------
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
----------------------------------------------
See Notes 1 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information regarding the provision and allowance for loan losses.
RISK ELEMENTS AND NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans, impaired loans, restructured
loans, and other real estate owned (foreclosed properties). The total
non-performing assets and loans that are 90 days or more past due and still
accruing interest increased 330.9% from $554 thousand at year-end 2001 to $2.4
million at year-end 2002, and increased 2.2% from $542 thousand at year-end 2000
to $554 thousand at year-end 2001. The total increase of $1.9 million in
non-accrual loans in 2002 is attributable to two mortgages on residential
single-family properties. Both loans are well secured and are expected to be
fully re-paid in 2003.
Loans are placed in non-accrual status when in the opinion of management the
collection of additional interest is unlikely or a specific loan meets the
criteria for non-accrual status established by regulatory authorities. No
interest is taken into income on non-accrual loans. A loan remains on
non-accrual status until the loan is current as to both principal and interest
or the borrower demonstrates the ability to pay and remain current, or both.
The ratio of non-performing assets and past due loans to total loans increased
from .13% at December 31, 2001 to .44% at December 31, 2002 and decreased from
..18% at December 31, 2000 to .13% at December 31, 2001. The increase in 2002 is
due to two loans on single-family residential properties representing $1.9
million of total non-performing assets. The Company expects its ratio of
non-performing assets to total loans to improve, assuming these two loans are
collected as expected in 2003; however, the ratio may increase from its current
level due to other identified potential problem loans on December 31, 2002. As
of December 31, 2002, there were $1.9 million of loans for which management has
identified risk factors that may result in them not being repaid in accordance
with their terms, compared to $2.6 million at December 31, 2001 and $1.2 million
at December 31, 2000. These loans are also primarily well secured and are
currently performing. See Notes 1 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information regarding the Company's non-performing assets.
12
Foreclosed real properties include properties that have been substantively
repossessed or acquired in complete or partial satisfaction of debt. Such
properties, which are held for resale, are carried at the lower of cost or fair
value, including a reduction for the estimated selling expenses, or principal
balance of the related loan. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company held
no foreclosed real properties.
TABLE 6: NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
(Dollars in thousands) 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998
-----------------------------------------------
Non-accrual loans $1,943 $ 106 $ 117 $ 106 $ 121
Impaired loans 444 119 107 143 213
Restructured loans -- -- -- -- --
Foreclosed properties -- -- -- -- --
-----------------------------------------------
Total non-performing assets $2,387 $ 225 $ 224 $ 249 $ 334
-----------------------------------------------
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing -- 329 318 68 --
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL NON-PERFORMING ASSETS AND PAST DUE LOANS $2,387 $ 554 $ 542 $ 317 $ 334
-----------------------------------------------
Allowance for loan losses to total loans 1.09% 1.05% .91% .91% .95%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing
loans 248.2% 1,936.0% 1,251.3% 758.6% 430.5%
Non-performing assets and past due loans to
total loans 0.44% 0.13% 0.18% 0.15% 0.22%
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS AND PAST DUE LOANS TO
TOTAL ASSETS 0.36% 0.11% 0.15% 0.11% 0.15%
-----------------------------------------------
LOAN PORTFOLIO
The Company's lending activities are its principal source of income. Real estate
loans, including residential permanents and construction, and commercial
permanents, represent the major portion of the Company's loan portfolio.
At December 31, 2002 loans, including loans held-for-sale, net of unearned
income and allowance for loan losses, totaled $535.8 million and increased 30.4%
from a 2001 year-end total of $410.9 million. In 2001, net loans increased 34.4%
from a year-end 2000 total of $305.7 million. The increase in loans in 2002
included an increase in real estate construction loans of $16.8 million, or
17.9%, and an increase in real estate mortgage loans of $105.8 million, or
38.5%. In 2001 growth in loans was also concentrated in these two categories
with real estate construction loans increasing $29.0 million, or 44.3%, while
real estate mortgage loans increased $76.6 million, or 38.6%. The increases in
real estate construction loans over the past two years are the direct result of
the Company's increased focus in this area and the hiring of loan officers
specializing in residential construction lending. At December 31, 2002, $69.5
million of real estate construction loans were to commercial builders of
single-family homes, $18.8 million were to individuals and $23.1 million were
related to commercial properties. The Company expects that real estate
construction loans will continue to grow, but not at the pace experienced in
2001 and 2002, although there can be no assurance.
The majority of the Bank's loan portfolio consists of construction and
commercial real estate loans. At December 31, 2002, the Bank had $69.5 million
of construction loans to commercial builders of single family housing in the
Northern Virginia market, representing 12.8% of total loans. These loans are
made to a number of unrelated entities and generally have a term of twelve to
eighteen months. Adverse developments in the Northern Virginia real estate
market or economy could have an adverse impact on this portfolio of loans and
the Bank's income and financial position. An additional 48.9% of the loan
portfolio at December 31, 2002 was secured by commercial, non-farm,
nonresidential real estate. These loans represent obligations of a diversified
pool of borrowers across numerous businesses and industries in the Northern
Virginia market and include some loans that, although secured by commercial real
estate, are commercial purpose loans made based on the financial condition of
the underlying business. At December 31, 2002, the Company had no other
concentrations of loans in any one industry exceeding 10% of its total loan
portfolio. An industry for this purpose is defined as a group of counterparties
that are engaged in similar activities and have similar economic characteristics
that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly
affected by changes in economic or other conditions. The Bank seeks to manage
its concentrations of loans through the establishment of limits on the level of
its various loan types to total loans and to total capital. For further
information regarding concentrations of loans see Note 16 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
13
Tables 7 and 8 present information pertaining to the composition of the loan
portfolio including unearned income, allowance for loan losses, and the
maturity/re-pricing of selected loans.
TABLE 7: SUMMARY OF TOTAL LOANS
DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998
----------------------------------------------------
Real estate - mortgage $380,972 $275,141 $198,541 $156,998 $109,774
Real estate - construction 111,333 94,452 65,460 17,238 12,794
Commercial 44,559 39,153 37,406 26,423 23,514
Consumer 6,941 8,004 7,995 6,968 4,983
----------------------------------------------------
Total loans $543,805 $416,750 $309,403 $207,627 $151,065
Less unearned income 2,033 1,444 883 567 187
Less allowance for loan losses 5,924 4,356 2,803 1,889 1,438
----------------------------------------------------
LOANS, NET $535,848 $410,950 $305,717 $205,171 $149,440
----------------------------------------------------
TABLE 8: MATURITY/REPRICING SCHEDULE OF SELECTED LOANS
At December 31, 2002 REAL ESTATE- REAL ESTATE-
(Dollars in thousands) MORTGAGE CONSTRUCTION COMMERCIAL CONSUMER
--------------------------------------------------
VARIABLE:
Within 1 year $ 48,151 $ 24,405 $ 13,194 $ 1,338
1-to-5 years 159,595 2,382 561 --
After 5 years 14,404 -- -- --
FIXED RATE:
Within 1 year 40,908 59,463 17,045 2,358
1-to-5 years 42,144 24,721 13,404 2,907
After 5 years 75,770 362 355 338
--------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LOANS $380,972 $111,333 $ 44,559 $ 6,941
--------------------------------------------------
At December 31, 2002, the aggregate amount of loans due after one year that have
fixed rates was approximately $160.0 million, and the amount with variable or
adjustable rates was approximately $176.9 million.
SECURITIES
The securities portfolio plays a primary role in the management of the interest
rate sensitivity of the Company, provides additional interest income, serves as
a source of liquidity, and is used as needed to meet certain collateral
requirements.
The securities portfolio consists of two components, securities held-to-maturity
and securities available-for-sale. Securities are classified as held-to-maturity
based on management's intent and the Company's ability, at the time of purchase,
to hold such securities to maturity. These securities are carried at amortized
cost. Securities which may be sold in response to changes in market interest
rates, changes in the securities' prepayment risk, increased loan demand,
general liquidity needs, and other similar factors are classified as
available-for-sale and are carried at estimated fair value.
Total securities increased $18.2 million, or 34.4%, from $53.0 million at
December 31, 2001 to $71.2 million at December 31, 2002 and increased $7.7
million, or 17.1%, from $45.3 million at year-end 2000 to $53.0 million at
year-end 2001. Securities of U.S. Government Agencies represent the majority of
the portfolio while obligations of states and or political subdivisions have
increased as a percentage of the total portfolio. Table 9 provides information
regarding the composition of the securities portfolio and Table 10 details the
maturities and weighted average yields (on a tax equivalent basis) at the dates
indicated. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information regarding the securities portfolio.
14
At December 31, 2002, there were no issuers, other than issuers who are
US government agencies, whose securities owned by the Company had an aggregate
book value of more than 10% of total stockholder's equity of the Company.
TABLE 9: SECURITIES PORTFOLIO
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) Percent Percent Percent
Book Value of total Book Value of total Book Value of total
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE:
U.S. Government Agency obligations $ 52,661 73.92% $ 40,619 76.62% $ 29,406 64.98%
Obligations of states/political
subdivisions 1,229 1.73% 275 .52% 270 .60%
Federal Reserve Bank stock 542 .76% 392 .74% 392 .87%
Federal Home Loan Bank stock 1,194 1.68% 732 1.38% 667 1.47%
Community Bankers' Bank stock 55 .08% 55 .10% 55 .12%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 55,681 78.17% $ 42,073 79.36% $ 30,790 68.04%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
HELD-TO-MATURITY:
U.S. Government Agency obligations $ 8,534 11.98% $ 6,017 11.35% $ 13,992 30.92%
Obligations of states/political
subdivisions 6,534 9.17% 3,945 7.44% -- --
Domestic corporate debt obligations 482 .68% 979 1.85% 472 1.04%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 15,550 21.83% $ 10,941 20.64% $ 14,464 31.96%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 71,231 100.00% $ 53,014 100.00% $ 45,254 100.00%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE 10: MATURITY OF SECURITIES
At December 31, 2002 2001 2000
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average
Book Value Yield Book Value Yield Book Value Yield
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maturing within one year $ -- -- $ -- -- $ 3,725 6.07%
Maturing after one through five years 38,549 3.77% 16,533 4.71% 22,314 5.87%
Maturing after five through ten years 12,966 4.87% 7,738 6.29% 8,113 6.87%
Maturing after ten years 19,716 5.96% 28,743 6.65% 11,102 6.66%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 71,231 4.58% $ 53,014 5.99% $ 45,254 6.26%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPOSITS
The Company's principal source of funds is depository accounts comprised of
demand deposits, savings and money market accounts, and time deposits.
Substantially all deposits are provided by individuals and businesses located
within the communities served.
Total deposits increased $160.1 million, or 39.3%, in 2002 from $406.9 million
at December 31, 2001 to $567.0 million at year-end 2002, and increased $96.0
million, or 30.9%, from $310.9 million at year-end 2000 to $406.9 million at
year-end 2001. In 2002, growth by deposit category included a 48.4% increase in
non-interest bearing deposits, a 43.7% increase in savings accounts and
interest-bearing demand deposits, and a 33.7% increase in time deposits. In 2001
non-interest bearing deposits increased 21.0%, savings and interest-bearing
demand deposits grew 27.9% and time deposits increased 36.5%. The average rate
paid on interest-bearing deposits fell one hundred and forty-three basis points
from 4.64% for the year ended December 31, 2001 to 3.21% for the year ended
December 31, 2002, and decreased thirty-four basis points from 4.98% in 2000 to
4.64% in 2001. Rates declined in all deposit account categories and in some
cases have reached near floor levels; however, the average rate on time deposits
is expected to decline further in 2003 as $169.6 million in time deposits will
mature and re-price at rates lower than the portfolio's current average rate.
15
Table 11 details maturities of time deposits with balances of $100,000 and over
which represent 39.9% of total time deposits as of December 31, 2002. See Note 6
to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Table 3 to this Management's
Discussion and Analysis for additional information regarding the maturities of
time deposit.
TABLE 11: MATURITIES OF TIME DEPOSITS WITH BALANCES $100,000 OR MORE
DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) 2002 2001 2000
------------------------------
3 months or less $ 18,477 $ 11,900 $ 2,159
3-6 months 10,831 9,029 3,960
6-12 months 44,289 21,075 22,509
Over 12 months 37,104 43,204 27,730
------------------------------
TOTAL $110,701 $ 85,208 $ 56,358
------------------------------
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
Short-term borrowings consist of securities sold under agreements to repurchase
that are secured transactions with customers and generally mature the day
following the date sold. These transactions are provided to several of the
Bank's non-interest bearing demand deposit customers and are considered a
core-funding source of the Bank. Short-term borrowings also include Federal
funds purchased, which are unsecured overnight borrowings from other financial
institutions and are generally used to accommodate short-term liquidity needs.
Table 12 provides information on the balances and interest rates on short-term
borrowings for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 (dollars in
thousands):
TABLE 12: SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS
At December 31, 2002 2001 2000
-----------------------------
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase $32,081 $32,931 $28,097
Federal funds purchased -- 9,521 1,000
-----------------------------
Total $32,081 $42,452 $29,097
Weighted interest rate at year end 0.37% 1.05% 5.06%
Averages for the year ended December 31,
Outstanding $33,791 $35,851 $23,537
Interest rate 0.73% 2.72% 4.57%
Maximum month-end outstanding $40,251 $42,452 $30,280
-----------------------------
LIQUIDITY
The Company's principal sources of liquidity and funding are its deposit base.
The level of deposits necessary to support the Company's lending and investment
activities is determined through monitoring loan demand. Considerations in
managing the Company's liquidity position include, but are not limited to,
scheduled cash flows from existing loans and investment securities, anticipated
deposit activity including the maturity of time deposits, and projected needs
from anticipated extensions of credit. The Company's liquidity position is
monitored daily by management to maintain a level of liquidity conducive to
efficiently meet current needs and is evaluated for both current and longer term
needs as part of the asset/liability management process.
16
The Company measures total liquidity through cash and cash equivalents,
securities available-for-sale, mortgage loans held-for-sale, other loans and
investment securities maturing within one year, less securities pledged as
collateral for repurchase agreements, public deposits and other purposes, and
less any outstanding federal funds purchased. These liquidity sources increased
$93.5 million, or 74.6%, from $125.3 million at December 31, 2001, to $218.8
million at December 31, 2002, and increased $27.0 million from $98.3 million at
December 31, 2000, to $125.3 million at December 31, 2001. The increase in 2002
was due to higher levels of loans maturing within one-year, an increase in
federal funds sold of $24.1 million, and an increase in available-for-sale
securities. Additional sources of liquidity available to the Bank include the
capacity to borrow funds through established short term lines of credit with
various correspondent banks, and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, while
the Company maintains a line of credit with a correspondent bank strictly for
the purpose of providing additional capital to the Bank. See Note 13 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding these
additional liquidity sources.
CAPITAL
The assessment of capital adequacy depends on a number of factors such as asset
quality, liquidity, earnings performance, changing competitive conditions and
economic forces, and the overall level of growth. The adequacy of the Company's
current and future capital needs is monitored by Management on an ongoing basis.
Management seeks to maintain a capital structure that will assure an adequate
level of capital to support anticipated asset growth and to absorb potential
losses.
The capital position of the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Virginia Commerce
Bank (the "Bank"), continues to meet regulatory requirements. The primary
indicators relied on by bank regulators in measuring the capital position are
the Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital, and leverage ratios.
Tier 1 capital consists of common and qualifying preferred stockholders' equity
less goodwill. Total risk-based capital consists of Tier 1 capital, qualifying
subordinated debt, and a portion of the allowance for loan losses. Risk-based
capital ratios are calculated with reference to risk-weighted assets. The
leverage ratio compares Tier 1 capital to total average assets. The Bank's Tier
1 risk-based capital ratio was 6.69% at December 31, 2002, compared to 6.32% at
December 31, 2001. The total risk-based capital ratio was 10.33% at December 31,
2002, compared to 10.09% at December 31, 2001. These ratios are in excess of the
mandated minimum requirement of 4.00% and 8.00%, respectively. The Bank's
leverage ratio was 5.72% at December 31, 2002 compared to 5.41% at December 31,
2001. The Company's Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, total risk-based capital
ratio, and leverage ratio was 10.03%, 11.89% and 8.52%, respectively, at
December 31, 2002 compared to 6.35%, 7.41%, and 5.44% at December 31, 2001.
These increases in both the Company's and the Bank's capital ratios were
primarily due to the $7 million in additional capital raised in the rights
offering in July 2002 and the $18 million in trust preferred capital notes
issued in the fourth quarter of the year. As of December 31, 2002 the Company
still held $8.0 million of the proceeds from the trust preferred securities.
Those funds were subsequently down-streamed to the Bank in the form of
additional subordinated debt and common equity in January 2003 and further
increased the Bank's capital ratios.
During 2001, the Company continued to borrow funds under a line of credit with a
correspondent bank in order to provide capital to fund growth and expansion at
the Bank. At December 31, 2001, the amount outstanding under the line of credit
was $11.0 million, as compared to $7.0 million at December 31, 2000. In 2002, as
strong asset growth continued, the Company provided additional capital through a
$7.0 million rights offering to existing stockholders in July 2002. Although the
offering was successful, the Company believed that additional capital would be
necessary to fund future growth. In November and December 2002 the Company
formed two financing subsidiaries in order to issue $18.0 million in trust
preferred securities through a private placement to unrelated parties. As the
$18.0 million in proceeds were in excess of current needs the Company re-paid
the $11.0 million outstanding on its line of credit. The Company continues to
maintain its line of credit; however, it is currently in a re-negotiation
process. Until the process is completed further advances would require the
correspondent's approval.
The ability of the Company to continue to grow is dependent on its earnings and
the ability to obtain additional funds for contribution to the Bank's capital,
through additional borrowing, the sale of additional common stock, or through
the issuance of additional trust preferred securities. In the event that the
Company is unable to obtain additional capital for the Bank on a timely basis,
the growth of the Company and the Bank may be curtailed, and the Company and the
Bank may be required to reduce their level of assets in order to maintain
compliance with regulatory capital requirements. Under those circumstances net
income and the rate of growth of net income may be adversely affected. The
Company believes that its current level of capital is sufficient to meet
anticipated growth, although there can be no assurance.
17
DIVIDENDS
The Company has not paid cash dividends since 1995, electing to retain earnings
for funding the growth of the Company and its business. The Company currently
anticipates continuing the policy of retaining earnings to fund growth. The
ability of the Company to pay dividends, should it elect to do so, depends
largely upon the ability of the Bank to declare and pay dividends to the
Company, as the principal source of the Company's revenue is dividends paid by
the Bank. Future dividends will depend primarily upon the Bank's earnings,
financial condition, and need for funds, as well as governmental policies and
regulations applicable to the Company and the Bank, which limit the amount that
may be paid as dividends without prior approval.
MARKET PRICE OF STOCK AND DIVIDENDS
The Company's stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol
"VCBI". Table 13 sets forth the range of high and low sales prices (adjusted for
stock dividends and splits) known to the Company for each full quarterly period
within the two most recent fiscal years.
TABLE 13: MARKET PRICE OF STOCK AND DIVIDENDS
2002 2001
--------------------------------------
Quarter High Low High Low
- -----------------------------------------------------------
First $22.20 $16.80 $12.12 $ 8.48
Second 27.70 19.28 12.80 11.20
Third 26.44 21.25 16.80 12.44
Fourth 25.07 22.51 16.84 13.32
The approximate number of the Company's stockholders at December 31, 2002, is
750. Information regarding stock dividends and splits in 2002, 2001, and 2000 is
as follows:
1. A five for four stock split in the form of a 25% stock dividend was
declared on February 28, 2002, for stockholders of record on March 15,
2002, and was paid on April 12, 2002.
2. A five for four stock split in the form of a 25% stock dividend was
declared on February 28, 2001, for stockholders of record on April 16,
2001, and was paid on May 11, 2001.
3. A stock dividend of 10% was declared on April 26, 2000, for stockholders
of record on May 12, 2000, and was paid on May 26, 2000.
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
The annual meeting of stockholders of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") will be held at 4:00 pm on Wednesday, April 30, 2003 at "The
Washington Golf and Country Club", 3017 North Glebe Road, Arlington, Virginia.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
A COPY OF FORM 10-K AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS
AVAILABLE WITHOUT CHARGE TO STOCKHOLDERS UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO:
WILLIAM K. BEAUCHESNE
TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
VIRGINIA COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.
14201 SULLYFIELD CIRCLE #500
CHANTILLY, VA 20151
18
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Stockholders and Directors
Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
Arlington, Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December
31, 2002, 2001 and 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.
Winchester Virginia
February 13, 2003
19
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
December 31,
---------------------
2002 2001
---------------------
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks $ 19,907 $ 15,155
Securities (fair value: 2002, $71,766; 2001, $53,143) 71,231 53,014
Federal funds sold 24,071 --
Loans held-for-sale 18,948 15,842
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $5,924 in 2002 516,900 395,108
and $4,356 in 2001
Bank premises and equipment, net 6,517 6,238
Accrued interest receivable 2,489 2,211
Other assets 2,824 1,943
---------------------
Total assets $662,887 $489,511
---------------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
DEPOSITS
Non-interest bearing demand deposits $ 98,575 $ 66,448
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits 190,811 132,811
Time deposits 277,610 207,663
---------------------
Total deposits $566,996 $406,922
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase and federal 32,081 42,452
funds purchased
Other borrowed funds 400 11,400
Trust preferred capital notes 18,000 --
Accrued interest payable 1,271 1,301
Other liabilities 2,289 1,216
Commitments and contingent liabilities -- --
---------------------
Total liabilities $621,037 $463,291
---------------------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, $1.00 par, 1,000,000 shares $ -- $ --
authorized and un-issued
Common stock, $1.00 par, 5,000,000 shares authorized,
issued and outstanding 2002, 3,739,330; 2001, 2,720,816 3,739 2,721
Surplus 19,622 13,190
Retained earnings 17,808 10,138
Accumulated other comprehensive income 681 171
---------------------
Total stockholders' equity $ 41,850 $ 26,220
---------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $662,887 $489,511
---------------------
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
20
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
Year Ended December 31,
-----------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
-----------------------------------
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Interest and fees on loans $ 35,491 $ 29,720 $ 23,215
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
U.S. Treasury securities and agency obligations 2,769 3,336 3,035
Other securities 382 190 90
Interest on federal funds sold 355 650 400
Interest on deposits with other banks 1 1 36
-----------------------------------
Total interest and dividend income $ 38,998 $ 33,897 $ 26,776
-----------------------------------
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits $ 13,341 $ 14,494 $ 11,425
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase and 245 976 1,076
federal funds purchased
Other borrowed funds 497 521 360
Trust preferred capital notes 45 -- --
-----------------------------------
Total interest expense $ 14,128 $ 15,991 $ 12,861
-----------------------------------
NET INTEREST INCOME: $ 24,870 $ 17,906 $ 13,915
Provision for loan losses 1,678 1,572 947
-----------------------------------
Net interest income after provision for loan losses $ 23,192 $ 16,334 $ 12,968
-----------------------------------
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges and other fees $ 1,630 $ 1,271 $ 980
Fees and net gains on loans held-for-sale 3,920 3,379 1,586
Gain (loss) on sale of securities (1) 13 --
Other 44 41 33
-----------------------------------
Total non-interest income $ 5,593 $ 4,704 $ 2,599
-----------------------------------
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits $ 10,159 $ 8,130 $ 5,812
Occupancy expense 2,915 2,337 1,946
Data processing 1,079 902 750
Other operating expense 3,064 2,613 2,128
-----------------------------------
Total non-interest expense $ 17,217 $ 13,982 $ 10,636
-----------------------------------
Income before taxes on income $ 11,568 $ 7,056 $ 4,931
Provision for income taxes 3,892 2,391 1,681
-----------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 7,676 $ 4,665 $ 3,250
-----------------------------------
Earnings per common share, basic $ 2.16 $ 1.38 $ 0.96
Earnings per common share, diluted $ 1.92 $ 1.26 $ 0.91
-----------------------------------
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
21
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Accumulated
Other Total
Preferred Common Retained Comprehensive Comprehensive Stockholders'
Stock Stock Surplus Earnings Income (Loss) Income Equity
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 1999 $ -- $ 1,970 $ 11,090 $ 4,983 $ (554) $ 17,489
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Income:
Net Income 2000 3,250 $ 3,250 3,250
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax, unrealized holding losses
arising during the period (net of
tax of $221) 430 430 430
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total comprehensive income $ 3,680
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10% stock dividend -- 196 2,558 (2,754) --
Cash paid in lieu of fractional
shares -- -- -- (3) -- (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2000 $ -- $ 2,166 $ 13,648 $ 5,476 $ (124) $ 21,166
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Income:
Net Income 2001 4,665 $ 4,665 4,665
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax, unrealized holding gains
arising during the period (net of
tax of $156) 304
Less reclassification adjustment,
(net of tax of $4) (9)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other comprehensive income 295 295 295
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total comprehensive income $ 4,960
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Five for four stock split in form
of a 25% stock dividend -- 541 (541) -- -- --
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares -- -- -- (3) -- (3)
Stock options exercised -- 14 83 -- -- 97
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2001 $ -- $ 2,721 $ 13,190 $ 10,138 $ 171 $ 26,220
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Income:
Net Income 2002 7,676 $ 7,676 7,676
Other comprehensive income, net of
tax, unrealized holding gains
arising during the period
(net of tax of $263) 510 510 510
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total comprehensive income $ 8,186
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Five for four stock split in form
of a 25% stock dividend -- 680 (680) -- -- --
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares -- -- -- (6) -- (6)
Rights offering, net of costs of $45 -- 291 6,666 -- -- 6,957
Stock options/warrants exercised -- 47 446 -- -- 493
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2002 $ -- $ 3,739 $ 19,622 $ 17,808 $ 681 $ 41,850
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
22
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
----------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Interest received $ 38,709 $ 33,719 $ 26,066
Other income received 5,594 4,691 2,599
Net change in loans held-for-sale (3,106) (10,924) (3,458)
Interest paid (14,159) (15,999) (12,228)
Cash paid to suppliers and employees (16,293) (12,720) (9,709)
Income tax benefit of stock options/warrants exercised (323) -- --
Income taxes paid (3,538) (3,454) (1,519)
----------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 6,884 $ (4,687) $ 1,751
----------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from maturities and principal payments on
securities held-to-maturity $ 3,358 $ 9,009 $ 4,040
Proceeds from maturities and principal payments on
securities available-for-sale 44,531 47,367 5,156
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale 1,350 14,016 --
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity (7,975) (5,446) (743)
Purchases of securities available-for-sale (58,699) (72,238) (6,756)
Net increase in loans made to customers (123,470) (95,880) (98,035)
Purchase of bank premises and equipment (1,303) (1,375) (823)
----------------------------------------
Net cash used in investing activities $(142,208) $(104,547) $ (97,161)
----------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in demand, NOW, money market and
savings accounts $ 90,127 $ 40,503 $ 28,819
Net increase in time deposits 69,947 55,485 39,071
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under
agreement to repurchase and federal funds purchased (10,371) 13,355 11,260
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowed funds (11,000) 4,000 4,500
Proceeds from issuance of trust preferred capital notes 18,000 -- --
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock 7,450 97 --
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares (6) (3) (3)
----------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities $ 164,147 $ 113,437 $ 83,647
----------------------------------------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $ 28,823 $ 4,203 $ (11,763)
----------------------------------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning 15,155 10,952 22,715
Ending $ 43,978 $ 15,155 $ 10,952
----------------------------------------
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
23
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY
(USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: 2002 2001 2000
---------------------------------------
Net income $ 7,676 $ 4,665 $ 3,250
---------------------------------------
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,024 878 801
Provision for loan losses 1,678 1,572 947
Deferred tax benefit (609) (566) (339)
Amortization of security premiums and accretion of
discounts (11) (9) 25
Origination of loans held-for-sale (207,817) (180,737) (79,831)
Sale of loans 204,711 169,813 76,373
Loss (gain) on sale of securities available-for-sale 1 (13) --
Increase in other assets (534) (54) (18)
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities 1,073 (59) 646
Increase in accrued interest receivable (278) (169) (736)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable (30) (8) 633
---------------------------------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ 6,884 $ (4,687) $ 1,751
---------------------------------------
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities $ 773 $ 447 $ 651
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
24
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. NATURE OF BANKING ACTIVITIES AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BUSINESS
On December 22, 1999, Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") became the
holding company for Virginia Commerce Bank (the "Bank"). The Company acquired
the Bank through a share exchange in which the stockholders of the Bank received
one share of the Company for each share of the Bank. The exchange was a tax-free
transaction for federal income tax purposes. The merger was accounted for on the
same basis as a pooling-of-interests.
The Company provides loan and deposit products to commercial and retail
customers in the Washington Metropolitan Area, with the primary emphasis on
Northern Virginia. The loan portfolio is generally collateralized by assets of
the customers and is expected to be re-paid from cash flows or proceeds from the
sale of selected assets of the borrowers.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Bank, VCBI Capital Trust I, VCBI Capital
Trust II and Northeast Land and Investment Company. In consolidation, all
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
In its normal course of business, the Company encounters two significant types
of risk: economic and regulatory. There are three main components of economic
risk: interest rate risk, credit risk and market risk. The Company is subject to
interest rate risk to the degree that its interest-bearing liabilities mature or
re-price more rapidly or on a different basis than its interest-earning assets.
Credit risk is the risk of default on the Company's loan portfolio that results
from the borrowers' inability or unwillingness to make contractually required
payments. Market risk reflects changes in the value of collateral underlying
loans receivable and the valuation of real estate held by the Company.
The determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates that
are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the economic environment
and market conditions. Management believes that, as of December 31, 2002, the
allowance for loan losses is adequate based on information currently available.
A worsening or protracted economic decline or substantial increase in interest
rates, would increase the likelihood of losses due to credit and market risks
and could create the need for substantial increases to the allowance for loan
losses. The Company is subject to the regulations of various regulatory
agencies, which can change significantly from year to year. In addition, the
Company undergoes periodic examinations by regulatory agencies, which may
subject it to further changes based on the regulators' judgments about
information available to them at the time of their examination.
SECURITIES
Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to
maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and recorded at amortized cost.
Securities not classified as held-to-maturity, including equity securities with
readily determinable fair values, are classified as available-for-sale and
recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings
and reported in other comprehensive income.
Purchased premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the
interest method over the terms of the securities. Declines in the fair value of
held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are
deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses.
Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and
are determined using the specific identification method.
LOANS HELD-FOR-SALE
Loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or market, determined in
the aggregate. Market value considers commitment agreements with investors and
prevailing market prices. All loans originated by the mortgage banking operation
are pre-sold and held-for-sale to outside investors, servicing released.
25
LOANS
The Company grants mortgage, commercial and consumer loans to customers. A
substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by real estate loans.
The ability of the Company's debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon
the real estate and general economic conditions of the Company's market area.
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable
future or until maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding unpaid
principal balances adjusted for the allowance for loan losses and any deferred
fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid
principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain origination costs, are
deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the related loan yield using the
interest method.
The accrual of interest on real estate and commercial loans is discontinued at
the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the credit is well-secured and in
the process of collection. Installment loans are typically charged-off no later
than 180 days past due. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or
charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is
considered doubtful.
All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual
or charged-off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans
is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for
return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and
interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are
reasonably assured.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have
occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses
are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility
of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to
the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and
is based upon management's periodic review of the collectibility of the loans in
light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio,
adverse situations that may affect the borrower's ability to repay, estimated
value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This
evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are
susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
Our allowance for loan losses has three basic components: the specific
allowance, the formula allowance and the unallocated allowance. Each of these
components is determined based upon estimates that can and do change when the
actual events occur. The specific allowance is used to individually allocate an
allowance for loans identified for impairment testing. Impairment testing
includes consideration of the borrower's overall financial condition, resources
and payment record, support available from financial guarantors and the fair
market value of collateral.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it
is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of
principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include
payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled
principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant
payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.
Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls
on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances
surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the
reasons for the delay, the borrower's prior payment record, and the amount of
the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is
measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either
the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's
effective interest rate, the loan's obtainable market price, or the fair value
of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
26
These factors are combined to estimate the probability and severity of inherent
losses. When impairment is identified, then a specific reserve is established
based on the Company's calculation of the loss embedded in the individual loan.
Large groups of smaller balance, homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated
for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual
consumer and residential loans for impairment. The formula allowance is used for
estimating the loss on internally risk rated loans exclusive of those identified
for impairment testing. The loans meeting the criteria for special mention,
substandard, doubtful and loss, as well as, impaired loans are segregated from
performing loans within the portfolio. Internally classified loans are then
grouped by loan type (commercial, commercial real estate, commercial
construction, residential real estate, residential construction or installment).
Each loan type is assigned an allowance factor based on management's estimate of
the associated risk, complexity and size of the individual loans within the
particular loan category. Classified loans are assigned a higher allowance
factor than non-rated loans due to management's concerns regarding their
collectibility or management's knowledge of particular elements surrounding the
borrower. Allowance factors grow with the worsening of the internal risk rating.
The unallocated formula is used to estimate the loss of non-classified loans and
loans identified for impairment testing for which no impairment was identified.
These un-criticized loans are also segregated by loan type and allowance factors
are assigned by management based on delinquencies, loss history, trends in
volume and terms of loans, effects of changes in lending policy, the experience
and depth of management, national and local economic trends, concentrations of
credit, quality of the loan review system and the effect of external factors
(i.e. competition and regulatory requirements). The factors assigned differ by
loan type. The unallocated allowance captures losses whose impact on the
portfolio have occurred but have yet to be recognized in either the formula or
specific allowance. Allowance factors and the overall size of the allowance may
change from period to period based on management's assessment of the factors
described above and the relative weights given to each factor. See Note 4 for
information regarding the allowance for loan losses.
BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Premises and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful
lives; leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective
leases or the estimated useful life of the leasehold improvement, whichever is
less. Depreciation and amortization are recorded on the straight-line and
declining-balance methods.
Costs of maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The costs
of replacing structural parts of major units are considered individually and are
expended or capitalized as the facts dictate.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability
(or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or
liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences
between book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities
and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.
LEASE ACQUISITION COSTS
Lease acquisition costs are being amortized over ten years using the
straight-line method.
ADVERTISING COST
The Company follows the policy of charging the production costs of advertising
to expense as incurred. Total advertising expense was $245 thousand, $180
thousand and $119 thousand in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
USE OF ESTIMATES
In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is
required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses, and the valuation of foreclosed real estate
and deferred tax assets.
27
RATE LOCK COMMITMENTS
The Company enters into commitments to originate mortgage loans whereby the
interest rate on the loans is determined prior to funding (rate lock
commitments). Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be
sold are considered to be derivatives. The period of time between issuances of a
loan commitment and closing and the sale of the loan generally ranges from
thirty to ninety days. The Company protects itself from changes in interest
rates through the use of best efforts forward delivery commitments, whereby the
Company commits to sell a loan at the time the borrower commits to an interest
rate with the intent that the buyer has assumed interest rate risk on the loan.
As a result, the Company is not exposed to losses nor will it realize
significant gains related to its rate lock commitments due to changes in
interest rates. The correlation between the rate lock commitments and the best
efforts contracts is very high due to their similarity. Because of this high
correlation no gain or loss occurs on the rate lock commitments.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on
hand, amounts due from banks, and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds
are sold and purchased for one-day periods.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders
divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would
have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as
well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance.
Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to
outstanding stock options and warrants, and are determined using the treasury
method.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains
and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and
liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale
securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the
balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of
comprehensive income.
STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN
At December 31, 2002, the Company has a stock-based compensation plan, which is
described more fully in Note 11. The Company accounts for the plan under the
recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. No stock-based employee
compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under the
plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common
stock on the date of the grant. The following table illustrates the effect on
net income and earnings per share for the Company had the fair value recognition
provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,
been adopted.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts) 2002 2001 2000
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME, AS REPORTED $ 7,676 $ 4,665 $ 3,250
Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined based on fair value
method of awards, net of tax (419) (354) (261)
PRO FORMA NET INCOME $ 7,257 $ 4,311 $ 2,989
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
As reported $ 2.16 $ 1.38 $ 0.96
Pro forma $ 2.04 $ 1.27 $ 0.88
DILUTED EARNING PER SHARE:
As reported $ 1.92 $ 1.26 $ 0.91
Pro Forma $ 1.82 $ 1.16 $ 0.83
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28
The fair value of each grant is estimated at the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions for grants in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively: price volatility
of 21.48%, 27.74% and 27.80%, risk-free interest rates of 5.43%, 5.04% and
6.95%, dividend rate of .02% and expected lives of 10 years. See Note 11 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the
Company's stock compensation plan.
29
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2001, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
("AICPA") issued Statement of Position 01-6, Accounting by Certain Entities
(Including Entities with Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance the
Activities of Others, to reconcile and conform the accounting and financial
reporting provisions established by various AICPA industry audit guides. This
Statement is effective for annual and interim financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and did not have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
On March 13, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standard Board determined that
commitments for the origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale
must be accounted for as derivatives instruments, effective for fiscal quarters
beginning after April 10, 2002. The Bank enters into commitments to originate
loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding. Such
rate lock commitments on mortgage loans to be sold in the secondary market are
considered derivatives. Accordingly, these commitments including any fees
received from the potential borrower are recorded at fair value in derivative
assets or liabilities, with changes in fair value recorded in the net gain or
loss on sale of mortgage loans. Fair value is based on fees currently charged to
enter into similar agreements, and for fixed-rate commitments also considers the
difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The
cumulative effect of adopting Statement No. 133 for rate lock commitments as of
December 31, 2002, was not material. The Company originally adopted Statement
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities on January
1, 2001.
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement 145,
Rescission of FASB No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and
Technical Corrections. The amendment to Statement 13 eliminates an inconsistency
between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required
accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are
similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This Statement also amends other
existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections,
clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The
provisions of this Statement related to the rescission of Statement 4 shall be
applied in fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The provisions of this
Statement related to Statement 13 are effective for transactions occurring after
May 15, 2002, with early application encouraged.
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This Statement
requires recognition of a liability, when incurred, for costs associated with an
exit or disposal activity. The liability should be measured at fair value. The
provisions of the Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities
initiated after December 31, 2002.
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Accordingly,
goodwill is no longer subject to amortization over its estimated useful life,
but is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment by applying a
fair value based test. Additionally, Statement 142 requires that acquired
intangible assets (such as core deposit intangibles) be separately recognized if
the benefit of the asset can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or
exchanged, and amortized over their estimated useful life. Branch acquisition
transactions were outside the scope of the Statement and therefore any
intangible asset arising from such transactions remained subject to amortization
over their estimated useful life.
In October 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No.
147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions. The Statement amends
previous interpretive guidance on the application of the purchase method of
accounting to acquisitions of financial institutions, and requires the
application of Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, and Statement No. 142
to branch acquisitions if such transactions meet the definition of a business
combination. The provisions of the Statement do not apply to transactions
between two or more mutual enterprises. In addition, the Statement amends
Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, to
include in its scope core deposit intangibles of financial institutions.
Accordingly, such intangibles are subject to a recoverability test based on
undiscounted cash flows, and to the impairment recognition and measurement
provisions required for other long-lived assets held and used.
The adoption of Statement No. 145, 146 and 147 did not have a material impact on
the Company's consolidated financial statements.
30
The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 148, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of
Statement No. 123, in December 2002. The Statement amends Statement No. 123 to
provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair
value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In
addition, the Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement 123 to
require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements
about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the
effect of the method used on reported results. Finally, this Statement amends
APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure about the
effects of stock options in interim financial information. The amendments to
Statement No. 123 are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2002. The amendments to APB No. 28 are effective for
financial reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2002. Early application is encouraged for both
amendments. The Company continues to record stock options under APB Opinion No.
25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and has not adopted the
alternative methods allowable under Statement No. 148.
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
A five-for-four stock split in the form of a 25% stock dividend was declared on
February 28, 2002. This transaction was recorded by increasing common stock by
$680 thousand and decreasing surplus by $680 thousand.
A five-for-four stock split in the form of a 25% stock dividend was declared on
February 28, 2001. This transaction was recorded by increasing common stock by
$541 thousand and decreasing surplus by $541 thousand.
A stock dividend of 10% was declared on April 26, 2000. This transaction was
recorded by increasing common stock by $196 thousand, increasing surplus by $2.5
million and decreasing retained earnings by $2.7 million.
NOTE 2. SECURITIES
Amortized cost and fair value of the securities available-for-sale and
held-to-maturity as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, are as follows (dollars in
thousands):
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED
DECEMBER 31, 2002 COST GAINS (LOSSES) FAIR VALUE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE:
U.S. Government Agency obligations $51,679 $ 982 $ -- $52,661
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 1,179 50 -- 1,229
Restricted stock:
Federal Reserve Bank 542 -- -- 542
Federal Home Loan Bank 1,194 -- -- 1,194
Community Bankers' Bank 55 -- -- 55
-----------------------------------------------
$54,649 $ 1,023 $ -- $55,681
HELD-TO-MATURITY:
U.S. Government Agency obligations $ 8,534 $ 341 $ -- $ 8,875
Obligations of state and political subdivisions 6,534 130 -- 6,664
Domestic corporate debt obligations 482 64 -- 546
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$15,550 $ 535 $ -- $16,085
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
31
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GROSS GROSS
AMORTIZED UNREALIZED UNREALIZED
DECEMBER 31, 2001 COST GAINS (LOSSES) FAIR VALUE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE:
U.S. Government Agency obligations $40,365 $ 256 $ (2) $40,619
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 270 5 -- 275
Restricted stock:
Federal Reserve Bank 392 -- -- 392
Federal Home Loan Bank 732 -- -- 732
Community Bankers' Bank 55 -- -- 55
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$41,814 $ 261 $ (2) $42,073
HELD-TO-MATURITY:
U.S. Government Agency obligations $ 6,017 $ 127 $ -- $ 6,144
Obligations of states and political subdivisions 3,945 16 (43) 3,918
Domestic corporate debt obligations 979 32 (3) 1,008
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$10,941 $ 175 $ (46) $11,070
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The amortized cost and fair value of the securities, excluding restricted stock,
as of December 31, 2002 by contractual maturity, are shown below (dollars in
thousands):
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 2002 AMORTIZED COST FAIR VALUE
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE:
Due after one year through five years $37,670 $38,067
Due after five years through ten years 5,543 5,724
Due after ten years 9,645 10,099
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$52,858 $53,890
HELD-TO-MATURITY:
Due after one year through five years $ 482 $ 546
Due after five years through ten years 7,242 7,450
Due after ten years 7,826 8,089
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$15,550 $16,085
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The amortized cost of securities pledged as collateral for repurchase
agreements, certain public deposits, and other purposes were $38.8 million and
$40.6 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
32
NOTE 3. LOANS
Major classifications of loans are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial $ 44,559 $ 39,153
Real estate - 1-4 family residential 67,061 60,493
Real estate - multifamily residential 29,269 19,323
Real estate - nonfarm, nonresidential 265,694 179,483
Real estate - construction 111,333 94,452
Consumer 6,941 8,004
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LOANS $524,857 $400,908
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less unearned income 2,033 1,444
Less allowance for loan losses 5,924 4,356
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOANS, NET $516,900 $395,108
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 4. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
An analysis of the allowance for loan losses is shown below for the years
ended December 31, (dollars in thousands):
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowance, at beginning of period $ 4,356 $ 2,803 $ 1,889
Provision charged against income 1,678 1,572 947
Recoveries added to reserve 45 4 3
Losses charged to reserve (155) (23) (36)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALLOWANCE, AT END OF PERIOD $ 5,924 $ 4,356 $ 2,803
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information about impaired loans as of and for the years ended December 31,
2002, 2001 and 2000, is as follows (dollars in thousands):
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Impaired loans for which an allowance has been provided $444 $119 $107
Impaired loans for which no allowance has been provided -- -- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL IMPAIRED LOANS $444 $119 $107
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowance provided for impaired loans, included in the allowance for loan losses 59 16 17
Average balance in impaired loans $281 $113 $125
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest income recognized -- -- --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-accrual loans excluded from impaired loan disclosure under FASB 114 amounted
to $1.9 million, $106 thousand, and $117 thousand at December 31, 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively. If interest on these loans had been accrued as interest
income, such income would have approximated $33 thousand, $17 thousand and $13
thousand for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
33
NOTE 5. BANK PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, as follows (dollars in thousands):
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Land $ 1,839 $ 1,839
Buildings 2,193 2,361
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 5,444 4,713
Leasehold improvements 1,997 1,257
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Cost $11,473 $10,170
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 4,956 3,932
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Net premises and equipment $ 6,517 $ 6,238
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depreciation and amortization expense on premises and equipment amounted to $1.0
million, $878 thousand and $801 thousand in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
NOTE 6. TIME DEPOSITS
The aggregate amount of time deposits with a minimum denomination of $100
thousand each, was approximately $110.7 million and $85.2 million at December
31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Scheduled maturities of all time deposits at
December 31, 2002, are as follows (dollars in thousands):
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 $169,614
2004 74,798
2005 10,927
2006 6,472
2007 15,786
2008 and thereafter 13
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
$277,610
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 7. INCOME TAXES
Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components at December 31, 2002
and 2001 (dollars in thousands):
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:
Allowance for loan losses $2,014 $1,458
Non-accrual loans 27 32
Organization costs 4 6
Deferred loan fees 83 83
Bank premises and equipment 154 94
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
$2,282 $1,673
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES:
Securities available-for-sale 351 88
Federal Home Loan Bank stock 2 2
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 353 $ 90
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
NET DEFERRED TAX ASSETS $1,929 $1,583
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
34
The provision for income tax and its components for the years ending December
31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 2002 2001 2000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current tax expense $ 4,501 $ 2,957 $ 2,020
Deferred tax benefit (609) (566) (339)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 3,892 $ 2,391 $ 1,681
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by
applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to pretax income from continuing
operations for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, due to the
following (dollars in thousands):
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECEMBER 31, 2002 2001 2000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computed "expected" tax expense $ 3,933 $ 2,399 $ 1,676
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
Nondeductible expense 8 6 5
Nontaxable income (49) (14) --
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ 3,892 $ 2,391 $ 1,681
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing
earnings per share and the effect on the weighted average number of shares of
diluted potential common stock. The weighted average number of shares, for all
years reported, have been adjusted to give effect to stock dividends and splits.
Potential dilutive common stock had no effect on income available to common
stockholders.
2002 2001 2000
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per Share Per Share Per Share
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE 3,559,757 $2.16 3,389,189 $1.38 3,383,398 $0.96
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock options 280,306 182,166 87,826
Warrants 156,857 142,111 111,553
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE 3,996,920 $1.92 3,713,466 $1.26 3,582,777 $0.91
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company leases office space for ten of its branch locations, its operations,
mortgage lending, and construction lending departments. These non-cancellable
agreements, which expire through April 2017, in some instances require payment
of certain operating charges. Generally, all leases contain renewal options of
one to two additional five-year terms.
The Company also leases seven pieces of equipment under noncancellable
agreements that expire through February 2004. All seven leases contain purchase
options that are available at the end of the lease term.
The total minimum lease commitment, adjusted for the effect of annual fixed
increases or the Consumer Price Index, at December 31, 2002, is $6.2 million,
due as follows (dollars in thousands):
35
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Due in the year ending December 31, 2003 $1,065
2004 1,017
2005 1,001
2006 604
2007 612
Thereafter 1,938
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The total lease expense was $1.2 million, $948 thousand and $651 thousand in
2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. In the normal course of business, the
Company makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities that
are not presented in the accompanying financial statements. The Company does not
anticipate any material losses as a result of the commitments and contingent
liabilities.
NOTE 10: LOANS TO OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Officers, directors and/or their related business interests are loan customers
in the ordinary course of business. In management's opinion, these loans are
made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for
comparable loans with other persons and do not involve more than normal risk of
collectibility or present other unfavorable features. The aggregate amount
outstanding on such loans at December 31, 2002 and 2001, was $3.9 million and
$3.4 million, respectively. During 2002, new loans and advances amounted to $3.3
million and repayments of $2.8 million were made.
NOTE 11. STOCK OPTIONS OUTSTANDING
The current plan, adopted May 29, 1998, and amended in May 2001, is a qualified
Incentive Stock Option Plan which provides for the granting of options to
purchase up to 345,312 shares of common stock at a price to be determined by the
Board of Directors at the date of grant, but in any event, no less than 100% of
the fair market value. Options outstanding at the beginning of 1998, were
granted under the Company's plan adopted in 1988 which was replaced by the
current plan. As of December 31, 2002, 282,952 options had been granted under
the current plan. Options are awarded to employees and the Board of Directors of
the Company at the discretion of the Board of Directors. All options expire ten
years from the grant date. All options granted under the current plan, through
December 31, 2002, vest over three years. In January 2003 52,750 options were
granted to twenty-four officers and seven outside directors of the Company at an
exercise price of $24.48 per share. Those options vest over five years.
A summary of the status of the plan at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, and
changes during the years ended on those dates is as follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001 2000
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average
Number Exercise Number of Exercise Number of Exercise
of Shares Price Shares Price Shares Price
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outstanding at beginning of year 380,256 $ 6.70 331,703 $ 6.30 215,009 $ 5.18
Granted 58,121 $ 17.10 69,805 $ 8.89 116,694 $ 8.32
Exercised 500 $ 7.23 13,899 $ 7.03 -- --
Forfeited -- -- 7,353 $ 10.15 -- --
Outstanding at end of year 437,877 $ 8.08 380,256 $ 6.70 331,703 $ 6.30
Exercisable at end of year 297,944 226,154 190,551
Pro forma weighted-average fair
value per option of options
granted during the year $ 8.11 $ 4.48 $ 5.54
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
36
A further summary about the options outstanding and exercisable at December 31,
2002 is provided in the following table:
OPTIONS OUTSTANDING OPTIONS EXERCISABLE
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number Remaining Weighted Number Weighted
Range of Exercise Outstanding at Contractual Average Exercisable at Average
Prices December 31, 2002 Life Exercise Price December 31, 2002 Exercise Price
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2.90 to $3.89 122,730 3.2 years $ 3.45 122,730 $ 3.45
$7.21 to $8.20 81,150 5.6 years 7.59 79,341 7.58
$8.33 to $8.88 173,876 7.4 years 8.48 95,118 8.43
$13.80 to $17.13 60,121 9.1 years 17.02 665 14.57
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$2.90 TO $17.13 437,877 4.9 YEARS $ 8.08 297,944 $ 6.17
All options granted, available under the current Plan, and exercisable have been
adjusted for all three years giving retroactive effect to the 10% stock dividend
in 2000 and the five for four stock splits in the form of 25% stock dividends in
2001 and 2002.
NOTE 12. DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN
In April 1996, the Company granted 185,286 warrants at an exercise price of
$3.56 to six outside Directors. In January 1998, the Company granted 20,796
warrants at an exercise price of $7.22 to an additional outside Director. All
warrants have been restated giving retroactive effect to the 10% stock
restructurings in 1998 and 1999, the 10% stock dividend in 2000 and the five for
four stock splits in the form of 25% stock dividends in 2001 and 2002. Of the
total warrants granted in April 1996, 46,321 were exercised in 2002. The balance
of those warrants outstanding of 138,965 are expected to be exercised in the
first quarter of 2003 as they will expire in April 2003. In addition to the
warrants, the seven outside Directors have each been awarded 8,593, 3,125 and
1,250 options under the Company's Incentive Option Plan in 2000, 2001 and 2002
respectively and as adjusted for the 10% stock dividend in 2000 and the five for
four stock splits in the form of 25% stock dividends in 2001 and 2002. In
January 2003 each of the seven outside Directors were awarded an additional
2,000 options.
NOTE 13. OTHER BORROWED MONEY AND LINES OF CREDIT
The Bank maintains a $99.4 million line of credit with the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Atlanta. The interest rate and term of each advance from the line is
dependent upon the advance and commitment type. Advances on the line are secured
by all of the Bank's qualifying first lien loans on one-to-four unit
single-family dwellings. As of December 31, 2002, the book value of these loans
totaled approximately $22.4 million. The amount of available credit is limited
to seventy-five percent of the qualifying loans. Advances on the line of credit,
in excess of total qualifying loans, require pledging of additional assets
including other types of loans and investment securities. As of December 31,
2002 and 2001, the Company had the following advances outstanding:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Creditor Advance Date Interest Rate Maturity Outstanding Principal (in `000s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FHLB 11-16-93 5.93% 11-16-03 $400
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bank has additional short term unused lines of credit totaling $19.9 million
with nonaffiliated banks at December 31, 2002.
NOTE: 14. TRUST PREFERRED CAPITAL NOTES
On November 13, 2002, the Company completed a private placement issuance of $3.0
million of trust preferred securities through a newly formed, wholly-owned,
subsidiary trust (VCBI Capital Trust I). The securities bear a floating rate of
interest, adjusted semi-annually, of 340 basis points over six month Libor,
initially set at 4.80%, with a maximum rate of 12.0% until November 15, 2007.
The securities have a thirty year term and are callable at par beginning
November 15, 2007.
37
On December 19, 2002, the Company completed a separate private placement
issuance of $15.0 million of trust preferred securities through another newly
formed, wholly-owned, subsidiary trust (VCBI Capital Trust II). These securities
bear a floating rate of interest, adjusted semi-annually, of 330 basis points
over six month Libor, initially set at 4.73%, with a maximum rate of 11.9% until
December 30, 2007. These securities also have a thirty year term and are
callable at par beginning December 30, 2007. The principal asset of each trust
is a similar amount of the Company's junior subordinated debt securities with
like maturities and interest rates to the trust preferred securities.
The obligations of the Company with respect to the issuance of the trust
preferred securities constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the
Company of each Trust's obligations with respect to the trust preferred
securities to the extent set forth in the related guarantees.
Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the Company may elect from time
to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debt securities,
resulting in a deferral of distribution payments on the related trust preferred
securities.
The Trust Preferred Securities may be included in Tier 1 capital for regulatory
capital adequacy purposes up to 25.0% of Tier 1 capital after its inclusion. The
portion of the trust preferred securities not qualifying as Tier 1 capital may
be included as part of total qualifying capital in Tier 2 capital.
NOTE 15. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
The Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the
normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These
financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of
credit and financial guarantees. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees,
elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in
the balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect
the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial
instruments.
The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the
other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and
standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the
contractual or notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same
credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for
on-balance-sheet instruments.
A summary of the contract or notional amount of the Company's exposure to
off-balance-sheet risk as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, is as follows:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands) 2002 2001
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent
credit risk:
Commitments to extend credit $ 10,230 $ 14,165
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written $ 11,298 $ 8,328
Unfunded lines of credit $132,909 $ 84,764
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as
there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may
require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire
without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer's
creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if
deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on
management's credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may
include cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, property
and equipment, residential real estate, and income-producing commercial
properties.
38
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional
commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to
a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and
private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing, and
similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
The Company holds certificates of deposit, marketable securities, and business
assets as collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed
necessary.
The Company originates loans for sale to secondary market investors subject to
contractually specified and limited recourse provisions. In 2002, the Company
originated $207.8 million and sold $204.7 million to investors, compared to
$180.7 million originated and $169.8 million sold in 2001. Most contracts with
investors contain certain recourse language that may vary from 90 days up to one
year. In general, the company may be required to repurchase a previously sold
mortgage loan or indemnify the investor if there is major non-compliance with
defined loan origination or documentation standards, including fraud, negligence
or material misstatement in the loan documents. Repurchase may also be required
if necessary governmental loan guarantees are canceled or never issued, or if an
investor is forced to buy back a loan after it has been re-sold as part of a
loan pool. In addition, the Company may have an obligation to repurchase a loan
if the mortgagor has defaulted early in the loan term. The potential default
period is approximately twelve months after sale of the loan to the investor.
Mortgages subject to recourse are collateralized by single-family residential
properties, have loan-to-value ratios of 80% or less, or have private mortgage
insurance or are insured or guaranteed by an agency of the United States
government.
At December 31, 2002, the Bank had locked-rate commitments to originate and
sell, on a best-effort basis, approximately $20 million in mortgage loans.
NOTE 16. CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK
The Bank does a general banking business, serving the commercial and personal
banking needs of its customers. The Bank's market area consists of the Northern
Virginia suburbs of Washington, DC, including Arlington County, the City of
Alexandria, Fairfax County and Prince William County, and to some extent the
Maryland suburbs and the city of Washington DC. Substantially all of the
Company's loans are made within its market area.
The ultimate collectibility of the Bank's loan portfolio and the ability to
realize the value of any underlying collateral, if needed, are influenced by the
economic conditions of the market area. The Company's operating results are
therefore closely related to the economic conditions and trends in the
Metropolitan Washington, DC area.
At December 31, 2002 and 2001, there were $406.3 million and $293.3 million, or
74.7% and 70.4%, respectively of total loans concentrated in commercial real
estate. Commercial real estate for purposes of this note includes all
construction loans, loans secured by 5+ family residential properties and loans
secured by non-farm non-residential properties. At December 31, 2002 and 2001
construction loans represented 20.5% and 22.7% of total loans, loans secured by
5+ family residential properties represented 5.4% and 4.6%, and loans secured by
non-farm non-residential properties represented 48.9% and 43.1%, respectively.
Construction loans at December 31, 2002 and 2001 included $69.5 million and
$45.8 million in loans to commercial builders of single family housing in the
Northern Virginia market, representing 12.8% and 11.0% of total loans,
respectively.
The Bank has established formal policies relating to the credit and collateral
requirements in loan originations including policies that establish limits on
various loan types as a percentage of total loans and total capital. Loans to
purchase real property are generally collateralized by the related property with
limitations based on the property's appraised value. Credit approval is
primarily a function of collateral and the evaluation of the creditworthiness of
the individual borrower, guarantors and or the individual project. Management
considers the concentration of credit risk to be minimal due to the
diversification of borrowers over numerous business and industries.
NOTE 17. FUND RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVE BALANCE
The transfer of funds from the Bank to the Company in the form of loans,
advances, and cash dividends are restricted by Federal and State regulatory
authorities. As of December 31, 2002, the aggregate amount of unrestricted funds
that could be transferred totaled approximately $11.5 million, or 27.52%, of the
consolidated net assets of the Company.
39
As members of the Federal Reserve System, the Company is required to maintain
certain average reserve balances. For the final weekly reporting period in the
years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the aggregate amounts of daily average
required balances were approximately $3.9 million and $798 thousand,
respectively.
NOTE 18. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The Company has a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all
full-time employees and provides that an employee becomes eligible to
participate at the date he or she has reached the age of 21 and has completed
three months of service, whichever occurs last. Under the plan, a participant
may contribute up to 15% of his or her covered compensation for the year,
subject to certain limitations. The Company may also make, but is not required
to make, a discretionary contribution for each participant out of its current or
accumulated net profits. The amount of contribution, if any, is determined on an
annual basis by the Board of Directors. Contributions made by the Company
totaled $182 thousand, $141 thousand and $107 thousand for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
NOTE 19. DISCLOSURES ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND INTEREST
RATE RISK
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that
value:
CASH AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
For those short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate
of fair value.
SECURITIES
For securities held for investment purposes, fair values are based on quoted
market prices or dealer quotes.
LOANS HELD-FOR-SALE
Fair value is based on selling price arranged by arms-length contracts with
third parties.
LOAN RECEIVABLES
For certain homogeneous categories of loans, such as some residential mortgages,
and other consumer loans, fair value is estimated using the quoted market prices
for securities backed by similar loans, adjusted for differences in loan
characteristics. The fair value of other types of loans is estimated by
discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans
would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same
remaining maturities.
DEPOSITS AND BORROWINGS
The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market
deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. For all other
deposits and borrowings, the fair value is determined using the discounted cash
flow method. The discount rate was equal to the rate currently offered on
similar products.
ACCRUED INTEREST
The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees
currently charged to enter similar agreements, taking into account the remaining
terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties.
For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference
between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.
40
The fair value of stand-by letters of credit is based on fees currently charged
for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise
settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.
At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the carrying amounts of loan commitments and
stand-by letters of credit approximate fair values.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial
instruments are as follows:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002 2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Carrying Estimated Fair Carrying Estimated Fair
(Dollars in thousands) Amount Value Amount Value
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Cash and short-term investments $ 43,978 $ 43,978 $ 15,155 $ 15,155
Securities 71,231 71,766 53,014 53,143
Loans held-for-sale 18,948 18,948 15,842 15,842
Loans 516,900 542,880 395,108 410,923
Accrued interest receivable 2,489 2,489 2,211 2,211
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Financial assets $653,546 $680,061 $481,330 $497,274
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits $566,996 $572,909 $406,922 $412,783
Securities sold under agreement to
repurchase and federal funds purchased 32,081 32,073 42,452 42,445
Other borrowed funds 18,400 18,364 11,400 11,441
Accrued interest payable 1,271 1,271 1,301 1,301
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Financial liabilities $618,748 $624,617 $462,075 $467,970
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to market risk which
includes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will
change) As a result, the fair values of the Company's financial instruments will
change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable
or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets
and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize this risk.
NOTE 20. CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements
administered by the Federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate certain mandatory, possibly additional discretionary,
actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect
on the Company's and Bank's financial statements. Under capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the
Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve
quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The
capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by
the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt
corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy
require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set
forth in the table below) of Total Capital, Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Leverage
Capital. Total Capital and Tier 1 Capital ratios are in reference to
risk-weighted assets (as defined), and the Tier 1 Leverage Capital ratio is in
reference to average assets. Management believes, as of December 31, 2002 and
2001, that the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it is
subject.
As of December 31, 2002, the Bank is categorized as "well-capitalized" under the
regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as
"well-capitalized", the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1
risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no
conditions or events since December 31, 2002 that management believes changed
the Bank's category. The Company's and the Bank's actual capital amounts and
ratios are also presented in the table.
41
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum To Be Well-
Minimum Capital Capitalized Under Prompt
Actual Capital Requirement* Corrective Action Provisions
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2002: AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CAPITAL:
Company $65,079 11.89% $43,774 8.00% $ N/A N/A
Bank 56,492 10.33% 43,731 8.00% 54,664 10.00%
TIER 1 CAPITAL:
Company $54,873 10.03% $21,887 4.00% $ N/A N/A
Bank 36,567 6.69% 21,865 4.00% 32,798 6.00%
TIER 1 LEVERAGE CAPITAL:
Company $54,873 8.52% $25,762 4.00% $ N/A N/A
Bank 36,567 5.72% 25,571 4.00% 31,964 5.00%
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001:
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CAPITAL:
Company $30,381 7.41% $32,081 8.00% $ N/A N/A
Bank 41,357 10.09% 32,800 8.00% 41,000 10.00%
TIER 1 CAPITAL:
Company $26,026 6.35% $16,401 4.00% $ N/A N/A
Bank 25,902 6.32% 16,400 4.00% 24,600 6.00%
TIER 1 LEVERAGE CAPITAL
Company $26,026 5.44% $19,152 4.00% $ N/A N/A
Bank 25,902 5.41% 19,151 4.00% 23,939 5.00%
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The minimum capital requirement for the Company is a guideline.
NOTE 21. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PARENT COMPANY
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands) DECEMBER 31, 2002 DECEMBER 31, 2001
Assets:
Cash and due from banks $ 8,090 $ 1
Investment in Subsidiary 37,832 26,096
Subordinated Debt in Subsidiary 14,000 11,100
Other Assets 542 31
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ASSETS $60,464 $37,228
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:
Junior subordinated capital notes $18,570 $ --
Long Term Debt -- 11,000
Other Liabilities 44 8
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Liabilities $18,614 $11,008
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stockholders' Equity 41,850 26,220
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $60,464 $37,228
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
42
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENTS OF INCOME (in thousands) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2002 2001 2000
--------------------------------
Income:
Interest on subordinated debt $ 615 $ 479 $ 333
Dividend from subsidiary 4,017 98 --
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Income 4,632 577 333
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expenses:
Interest on trust preferred capital notes $ 44 -- --
Interest on long term debt 472 491 336
Other operating expense 94 32 20
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Expenses 610 523 356
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gain (loss) before income taxes (benefit) and equity in
undistributed earnings of subsidiary $ 4,022 $ 54 $ (23)
Income Tax (Benefit) 2 (15) (8)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4,020 69 (15)
Equity in undistributed net income of
Virginia Commerce Bank 3,656 4,596 3,265
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income $ 7,676 $ 4,665 $ 3,250
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (in thousands) YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2002 2001 2000
----------------------------------
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Income $ 7,676 $ 4,665 $ 3,250
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
Provided by operating activities:
Equity in undistributed net income of Virginia
Commerce Bank (3,656) (4,596) (3,265)
Decrease (increase) in other assets (511) 112 (131)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities 36 (177) 152
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 3,545 $ 4 $ 6
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purchase additional stock in subsidiary (7,570) -- --
Purchase of debt securities (2,900) (4,100) (4,500)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash (used in) investing activities $(10,470) $ (4,100) $ (4,500)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net (decrease) increase in long term debt (11,000) 4,000 4,500
Net increase in junior subordinated capital notes 18,570 -- --
Common stock issued 7,450 97 --
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares (6) (3) (3)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities $ 15,014 $ 4,094 $ 4,497
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change in cash and cash equivalents $ 8,089 $ (2) $ 3
Beginning 1 3 0
Ending $ 8,090 $ 1 $ 3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
43
NOTE 22. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Selected financial information for the quarterly periods of 2002 and 2001 is
presented below (dollars in thousands except per share data):
2002 QUARTERS
-----------------------------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
-----------------------------------------------------
Interest income $ 8,748 $ 9,634 $10,225 $10,391
Interest expense 3,377 3,563 3,643 3,545
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income $ 5,371 $ 6,071 $ 6,582 $ 6,846
Provision for loan losses 521 322 571 264
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses $ 4,850 $ 5,749 $ 6,011 $ 6,582
Non-interest income 1,267 1,194 1,368 1,764
Non-interest expense 4,065 4,116 4,235 4,802
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income before taxes $ 2,052 $ 2,827 $ 3,144 $ 3,545
Income tax expense 689 952 1,058 1,193
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income $ 1,363 $ 1,875 $ 2,086 $ 2,352
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income per common share:
Basic $ 0.40 $ 0.55 $ 0.56 $ 0.63
Diluted $ 0.36 $ 0.48 $ 0.50 $ 0.57
2001 QUARTERS
-----------------------------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
-----------------------------------------------------
Interest income $8,048 $8,436 $8,827 $8,586
Interest expense 4,048 4,154 4,159 3,630
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net interest income $4,000 $4,282 $4,668 $4,956
Provision for loan losses 270 180 225 897
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses $3,730 $4,102 $4,443 $4,059
Non-interest income 880 1,135 1,237 1,452
Non-interest expense 3,188 3,455 3,530 3,809
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income before taxes $1,422 $1,782 $2,150 $1,702
Income tax expense 484 605 729 573
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income $ 938 $1,177 $1,421 $1,129
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income per common share:
Basic $ 0.28 $ 0.35 $ 0.42 $ 0.33
Diluted $ 0.26 $ 0.32 $ 0.38 $ 0.30
44
BUSINESS
GENERAL
Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") was organized under Virginia law
on November 5, 1999 to become the holding company for Virginia Commerce Bank
(the "Bank"). The Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of the Bank on
December 22, 1999, upon the effectiveness of the Agreement and Plan of Share
Exchange dated September 22, 1999 between the Company and the Bank. As a result
of the Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange, each shares of the Bank's common
stock was automatically exchanged for and converted into one share of the
Company's common stock.
The Bank was organized as a national banking association and commenced
operations on May 16, 1988. On June 1, 1995, the Bank converted from a national
banking association to a Virginia chartered bank which is a member of the
Federal Reserve System.
The Company's and the Bank's executive offices and a branch with a drive-in
facility are located at 5350 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia. The Bank has
twelve additional full service branch offices, located at: 2930 Wilson Boulevard
and 6500 Williamsburg Boulevard, both in Arlington, Virginia; 1414 Prince
Street, 5140 Duke Street and 506 King Street in Alexandria, Virginia, 1356 Chain
Bridge Road in McLean, Virginia, 4230 John Marr Drive in Annandale, Virginia,
10777 Main Street in Fairfax, Virginia, 374 Maple Avenue East in Vienna,
Virginia, 13881 G Metrotech Drive in Chantilly, Virginia, 2030 Old Bridge Road
in Lake Ridge, Virginia, and 11820 Spectrum Center in Reston, Virginia.
Additionally, the Bank maintains residential mortgage lending offices, located
in Vienna and Warrenton, Virginia.
The Company engages in a general commercial banking business through the Bank,
its sole direct operating subsidiary. The Bank's customer base includes small-
to-medium-sized businesses, including firms that have contracts with the U.S.
government, associations, retailers and industrial businesses, professionals and
business executives and consumers. The economic base of the Bank's service area
is Arlington and Fairfax Counties and the City of Alexandria in Northern
Virginia, and the metropolitan Washington, DC area generally. Northern Virginia
has experienced significant population and economic growth during the past
decade. The Bank participated in this growth through its commercial and retail
banking activities.
The Bank's primary service area consists of the Northern Virginia suburbs of
Washington DC, including Arlington County, the City of Alexandria, Fairfax
County and Prince William County. This area's banking business is dominated by a
small number of large commercial banks with extensive branch networks. Most are
branches of national, state-wide or regional banks. The Bank's primary service
area is also served by a large number of other financial institutions, including
savings banks, credit unions and non-bank financial institutions such as
securities brokerage firms, insurance companies and mutual funds. The Bank's
primary service area is oriented toward independently owned
small-to-medium-sized businesses, light industry and firms specializing in
government contracting. An increasing number of new community banking
organizations have been opened in the Bank's market area, potentially
representing an increased competitive threat to the Bank.
The banking business in Virginia generally, and in the Bank's primary service
area specifically, is highly competitive with respect to both loans and
deposits, and is dominated by a relatively small number of major banks with many
offices operating over a wide geographic area. Among the advantages such major
banks have over the Bank are their ability to finance wide-ranging advertising
campaigns and to allocate their investment assets to regions of highest yield
and demand. Such banks offer certain services such as international banking,
which are not offered directly by the Bank (but are offered indirectly through
correspondent institutions) and, by virtue of their greater total
capitalization, such banks have substantially higher lending limits than the
Bank. The Bank competes for deposits and lendable funds with other commercial
banks, savings banks, credit unions and other governmental and corporate
entities which raise operating capital through the issuance of debt and equity
securities. The Bank also competes for available investment dollars with
non-bank financial institutions, such as brokerage firms, insurance companies
and mutual funds. With respect to loans, the Bank competes with other commercial
banks, savings banks, consumer finance companies, mortgage companies, credit
unions and other lending institutions. Additionally, as a result of enactment of
federal and Virginia interstate banking legislation, additional competitors
which are not currently operating in Virginia may enter the Bank's markets and
compete directly with the Bank. Recent legislation expanding the array of firms
that can own banks may also result in increased competition for the Company and
the Bank.
45
The majority of the Bank's deposits are attracted from individuals and business
in the Metropolitan Washington DC area., and as such, no material portion of the
Bank's deposits have been obtained from any single person , single entity , or
area outside the Metropolitan Washington DC area. The loss of any one or more of
the Bank's depositors would not have a materially adverse effect on the business
of the Bank. The Bank's loans are not concentrated within a single industry or
group of related industries.
The Bank provides businesses with a full range of deposit accounts, merchant
bankcard services, electronic funds transfer services, lock-box services, PC
banking, lines of credit for working capital, term loans and commercial real
estate loans, and provides consumers with a wide array of deposit products, home
equity and revolving lines of credit, installment loans and internet banking
services. The Bank also offers insurance and investment services and provides
safe deposit boxes as well as other customary banking services. The Bank is not
authorized to offer trust services nor does it offer international services but
makes these services available to its customers through financial institutions
with which the Bank has correspondent banking relationships.
The Bank also offers a wide variety of residential mortgage loans through its
mortgage lending division which are originated on a pre-sold, servicing released
basis to numerous investors. Offered types include conventional single family
first trusts, FHA and VA mortgages for both purchase and refinance purposes. In
addition, the Bank offers construction loans to both individuals and commercial
builders on single family residential properties which are generally for terms
of twelve to eighteen months. Changes in the local real estate market and
interest rates could adversely impact the level of loans originated for sale and
the level of construction loans originated and outstanding, and the resulting
fees and earnings thereon.
The Bank does not depend upon seasonal business. The Bank relies substantially
on local promotional activity, personal contact by its officers, directors,
employees and stockholders, personalized service and its reputation in the
communities served to compete effectively.
The Bank has one wholly owned subsidiary, Northeast Land and Investment Company,
a Virginia corporation, organized to hold and market foreclosed real estate.
On December 31, 2002, the Company had 160 full-time equivalent employees,
including four executive officers. None of the Company's employees presently is
represented by a union or covered under a collective bargaining agreement.
Management of the Company believes that its employee relations are satisfactory.
The Company does not have any employees that are not also employees of the Bank.
Banking is dependent upon interest rate differentials. In general, the
difference between the interest rate paid by the Bank on its deposits and its
other borrowings and the interest rate earned by the Bank on loans, securities
and other interest-earning assets comprises the major source of the Bank's
earnings, while increasing fees and net gains on mortgage loans originated for
sale have made a significant contribution to the Bank's non-interest earnings.
Thus, the earnings and growth of the Bank are subject to the influence of
economic conditions generally, both domestic and foreign, and also of the
monetary and fiscal policies of the United States and its agencies, particularly
the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board implements national
monetary policy, such as seeking to curb inflation and combat recession, by its
open-market activities in United States government securities, by adjusting the
required level of reserves for financial institutions subject to reserve
requirements and through adjustments to the discount rate applicable to
borrowings by banks which are members of the Federal Reserve System. The actions
of the Federal Reserve Board in these areas influence the growth of bank loans,
investments and deposits and also affect interest rates. The nature and timing
of any future changes in such policies and their impact on the Bank cannot be
predicted. In addition, adverse economic conditions could make a higher
provision for loan losses a prudent course and could cause higher loan loss
charge-offs, thus adversely affecting the Bank's net income.
From time to time, new legislation or regulations are adopted which increase the
cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities, or otherwise
affect the competitive balance between banks and other financial institutions.
Bills have been introduced in each of the last three Congresses which would
permit banks to pay interest on checking and demand deposit accounts established
by businesses, a practice which is currently prohibited by regulation. If the
legislation effectively permitting the payment of interest on business demand
deposits is enacted, of which there can be no assurance, it is likely that we
may be required to pay interest on some portion of our non-interest bearing
deposits in order to compete against other banks. As a significant portion of
our deposits are non-interest bearing demand deposits established by businesses,
payment of interest on these deposits could have a significant negative impact
on our net income, net interest income, interest margin, return on assets and
46
equity, and other indices of financial performance. We expect that other banks
would be faced with similar negative impacts. We also expect that the primary
focus of competition would continue to be based on other factors, such as
quality of service. Additionally, various proposals are under consideration and
study for the reform or revision of deposit insurance premium assessment system.
Currently, we are not subject to payment of deposit insurance premiums and
generally have not been over the past several years. If we are required to pay
deposit insurance premiums, our earnings will be adversely affected.
Banks or bank holding companies which are undercapitalized and either have not
timely approved a capital plan or have failed to implement the plan become
subject to extraordinary powers pursuant to which the bank regulatory agencies
may close the bank, restrict its growth, force its sale, restrict interest rates
paid on deposits, and dismiss directors or senior executive officers. Each
agency has prescribed standards relating to internal controls and systems, loan
documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth,
compensation, fees and benefits, and other operational and managerial standards.
The agencies have also adopted standards relating to asset quality, earnings,
valuation and compensation. Banks or bank holding companies which do not meet
such standards may be subject to restrictions and consequences comparable to
those which apply to undercapitalized banks and bank holding companies. Bank
regulatory authority to appoint a conservator or receiver for a bank is broad,
including grounds such as substantial dissipation of assets or earnings due to
violations of law or regulation or due to any unsafe or unsound practices, an
unsafe or unsound condition, and certain violations of law or regulation likely
to weaken the institution's condition.
Regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board prohibit state member banks
such as the Bank from paying any dividend on common stock out of capital.
Dividends can be paid only to the extent of net profits then on hand, less
losses and bad debts. Without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, a
state member bank cannot pay dividends in any calendar year in excess of the
retained net profits for the prior two years and the profits of the current
year, less any required transfers to surplus.
LENDING ACTIVITIES
The Bank offers a wide array of lending services to its customers, including
commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, lines of credit, equipment
financing, construction loans, letters of credit, residential mortgages,
personal loans, auto loans and home equity loans and lines of credit. Loan
terms, including interest rates, loan to value ratios, and maturities, are
tailored as much as possible to meet the needs of the borrower within prudent
lending guidelines in terms of interest rate risk and credit risk.
When considering loan requests, the primary factors taken into consideration are
the purpose, the cash flow and financial condition of the borrower, primary and
secondary repayment sources, the value of the underlying collateral, if
applicable, and the character and integrity of the borrower. These factors are
evaluated in a number of ways including an analysis of financial statements,
credit history, trade references and visits to the borrower's place of business.
The Bank has adopted a comprehensive loan policy manual to provide its loan
officers with underwriting, term, collateral, loan-to-value and pricing
guidelines.
The Bank's goal is to build and maintain a commercial loan portfolio consisting
of term loans, lines of credit, commercial real estate and construction loans
provided primarily to locally-based borrowers. Additionally, installment loans
and personal lines of credit, as well as residential mortgages, are made
available to consumer customers. Commercial loans are generally considered to
have a higher degree of risk of default or loss than other types of loans, such
as residential real estate loans, because repayment may be affected by general
economic conditions, interest rates, the quality of management of the business,
and other factors which may cause a borrower to be unable to repay its
obligations. General economic conditions can directly or indirectly affect the
quality of a small and mid-sized business loan portfolio. The Bank manages the
loan portfolio to avoid high concentrations of similar industry loan types
and/or property types in relation to total capital. Commercial construction
loans will make up 50-100% of total capital, residential construction loans
125-250%, commercial real estate loans 400-600%, residential mortgages and home
equity loans 100-200%, commercial loans 100-200% and consumer installment and
personal loans 50-100%. Overall, real estate loans will not exceed 750% of total
capital. There can however, be no assurance that the Bank will be able to
achieve or maintain this distribution of loans. At December 31, 2002 the loan
portfolio's actual composition compared to qualified capital consisted of
approximately 22% commercial construction loans, 125% residential construction
loans, 522% commercial real estate loans, 119% residential mortgages and home
equity loans, 79% commercial loans and 12% consumer installment and personal
loans. Total real estate loans were 719%.
47
The lending activities in which we engage carry the risk that borrowers will be
unable to perform on their obligations. As such, interest rate policies of the
Federal Reserve Board and general economic conditions, nationally and in our
primary market area will have a significant impact on our results of operations.
To the extent that economic conditions deteriorate, business and individual
borrowers may be less able to meet their obligations in a timely manner,
resulting in decreased earnings or losses to the Bank. To the extent that loans
are secured by real estate, adverse conditions in the real estate market may
reduce the ability of the borrower to generate the necessary cash flow for
repayment of the loan and reduce our ability to collect the full amount of the
loan upon a default. These same external factors could also negatively impact
collateral values. To the extent that the Bank makes fixed rate loans, general
increases in interest rates will tend to reduce our spread as the interest rates
we must pay for deposits increase. Interest rates may also adversely affect the
value of property pledged as security for loans.
We constantly strive to mitigate risks in the event of unforeseen threats to the
loan portfolio as a result of an economic downturn or other negative influences.
Plans for mitigating inherent risks in managing loan assets include carefully
enforcing loan policies and procedures, evaluating each borrower's industry and
business plan during the underwriting process, identifying and monitoring
primary and alternative sources for repayment, obtaining collateral that is
margined to minimize loss in the event of liquidation, ongoing tests of borrower
credit worthiness and cash flow, ongoing collateral evaluations and site
inspections and monitoring of economic and market trends
Loan business is generated primarily through referrals and direct-calling
efforts. Referrals of loan business comes from directors, shareholders, current
customers and professionals such as lawyers, accountants and financial
intermediaries.
At December 31, 2002, the Banks statutory lending limit to any single borrower
was $8,475,756 subject to certain exceptions provided under applicable law. As
of December 31, 2002, the Bank's credit exposure to its largest borrower did not
exceed $7,500,000.
Commercial Loans: Commercial loans are written for any legitimate business
purpose including the financing of plant and equipment, interim working capital
pending collection of accounts receivable, permanent working capital for growth
and the acquisition and construction of real estate projects. There is a focus
in the Bank's loan portfolio on commercial real estate investment which
represents a predominant activity in the Bank's market area. The Bank's
commercial loan portfolio reflects a diverse group of borrowers with no
significant concentration in any borrower, or group of borrowers.
Commercial construction loans, residential construction loans to builders and
land acquisition and development loans are made to builders with established
track records of quality construction. Land loans are discouraged unless
underwritten in conjunction with a related construction loan or out-sale
contract. Typical advance rates are not greater than 65% of the lesser of cost
or appraisal for raw land, 75% of the value of finished lots for land
acquisition, and 80% of land cost and 100% of construction costs for
construction loans. In all cases, a minimum 10% equity contribution of total
project costs is required. Financing terms generally do not exceed 24 months.
Construction loans are subject to progress inspections and controlled advances.
Speculative construction loans are maintained to a minimum with a majority of
loans requiring pre-sale contracts or specified lease-up thresholds prior to
construction commencement. Personal guarantees by principals of borrowing
entities is a standard requirement and loans are typically priced to float at a
factor at or above the prime lending rate.
Commercial real estate loans will generally represent borrower occupied
transactions with a principal reliance on the borrowing businesses' ability to
repay or investor transactions focused on tenant quality, occupancy and expense
controls, as well as prudent guidelines for assessing real estate values. Risks
inherent in managing a commercial real estate portfolio relate to either sudden
or gradual drops in property values as a result of a general or local economic
downturn. A decline in real estate values can cause loan to value margins to
increase and diminish the Bank's equity cushion on both an individual and
portfolio basis. The Bank attempts to mitigate commercial real estate lending
risks by carefully underwriting each loan of this type to address the perceived
risks in the individual transaction. Generally, the Bank requires a loan to
value ratio of 80% of the lesser of cost or appraisal for owner occupied
transactions and 75% for investor transactions. A borrower's ability to repay is
carefully analyzed and policy calls for a minimum ongoing cash flow to debt
service requirement of 1.10 to 1 although most loans exceed this minimum. An
48
approved list of commercial real estate appraisers selected on the basis of a
reputation for quality and accuracy has been established. Each appraisal is
scrutinized in an effort to insure compliance with established appraisal
guidelines and conformity with current comparable market values. The Bank
generally requires personal guarantees on all loans to closely-held entities as
a matter of policy. Borrowers are required to provide, at a minimum, annual
corporate, partnership and personal financial statements to comply with Bank
policy. Interest rate risk to the Bank is mitigated by using either floating
interest rates or by fixing rates for an intermediate period of time, generally
less than five years. While loan amortizations may be approved for up to 360
months, loans generally have a call provision (maturity date) of 10 years or
less.
Commercial term loans are used to provide funds for equipment and general
corporate needs. This loan category is designed to support borrowers who have a
proven ability to service debt over a term generally not to exceed 84 months.
The Bank typically requires a first lien position on the collateral financed and
other business assets and guarantees from owners having at least a 20% interest
in the business. Interest rates on commercial term loans generally float or are
fixed for a term not to exceed five years. Management carefully monitors
industry and collateral concentrations to avoid loan exposures to a large group
of similar industries and/or similar collateral. Commercial loans are evaluated
for historical and projected cash flow, balance sheet strength and primary and
secondary repayment sources. Commercial term loan documents include certain
financial and performance covenants and require borrowers to forward regular
financial information on both the business and on personal guarantors at least
annually. In certain cases, this information is required more frequently,
depending on the degree to which lenders desire information to monitor a
borrower's financial condition and compliance with loan covenants. Key person
life insurance is required as appropriate and as necessary to mitigate the risk
associated with the loss of a primary owner or manager.
Commercial lines of credit are used to finance a business borrower's short-term
or seasonal credit needs and advances are often based on a percentage of
eligible receivables and inventory. In addition to the risks inherent in term
loan facilities, line of credit borrowers typically require additional
monitoring to protect the lender against diminishing collateral values.
Commercial lines of credit are generally revolving in nature and payable on
demand. The Bank generally requires at least an annual rest period (for seasonal
borrowers) and regular financial information (monthly or quarterly financial
statements, monthly accounts receivable agings, borrowing base certificates,
etc.) for borrowers with rapid growth and permanent working capital financing
needs. Advances against collateral are generally margined, limiting advances on
eligible receivables to 75-80% of current accounts. Lines of credit and term
loans to the same borrowers are generally cross-defaulted and
cross-collateralized. Industry and collateral concentration disciplines are the
same as those used in managing the commercial term loan portfolio. Interest rate
charges on this group of loans generally float at a factor at or above the prime
lending rate. Generally, personal guarantees are also required on these loans.
Consumer Loans. Loans are considered for any worthwhile personal purpose on a
case-by-case basis, such as financing of tuition, household expenditures, home
and automobile financing. Consumer credit facilities are underwritten to focus
on the borrower's credit record, length and stability of employment, income to
service debt and quality of collateral. Residential real estate loans held in
portfolio are limited to advances of 90% of loan to appraised value. Maximum
debt to income ratio established by loan policy is 40% and maximum unsecured
revolving debt will not exceed 10% of net worth. Installment loan terms range
out to 72 months and are priced at fixed interest rate. Home equity loans
amortize over 5-15 years and are fixed rate while home equity lines are
revolving with 10-year maturities and have floating rates tied to the prime
rate.
Mortgage Lending. The Company originates residential mortgage loans, on a
pre-sold basis, for sale to secondary market purchasers, on a servicing released
basis. This produces benefits primarily in the form of gains on the sale of the
loans at a premium. Activity in the residential mortgage loan market is highly
sensitive to changes in interest rates. The loans are sold on a limited recourse
basis. Most contracts with investors contain recourse periods that may vary from
90 days up to one year. In general, the Company may be required to repurchase a
previously sold mortgage loan or indemnify the investor if there is major
non-compliance with defined loan origination or documentation standards,
including fraud, negligence or material misstatement in the loan documents.
Repurchase may also be required if necessary governmental loan guarantees are
canceled or never issued, or if an investor is forced to buy back a loan after
it has been re-sold as part of a loan pool. In addition, the Company may have an
obligation to repurchase a loan if the mortgagor has defaulted early in the loan
term. The potential default period is approximately twelve months after sale of
the loan to the investor. Mortgages subject to recourse are collateralized by
single-family residential properties, have loan-to-value ratios of 80% or less,
or have private mortgage insurance or are insured or guaranteed by an agency of
the United States government.
49
Loan Administration. As part of its internal loan administration process, the
Bank's Directors Loan Committee, comprised of directors, reviews all loans
30-days delinquent, loans on the watch list, loans rated special mention,
substandard, or doubtful and other loans of concern at least quarterly. The
Committee also reviews new loan production, credit concentrations, loan loss
reserves, declined loans, documentation exceptions, loan policy exceptions, new
products and pricing. The Committee commissions periodic documentation and
internal control reviews by outside vendors to complement internal audit and
credit administration oversight.
REGULATION, SUPERVISION, AND GOVERNMENTAL POLICY
The Company. The Company is a bank holding company registered under Bank Holding
Company Act of 1956, as amended, (the "BHCA") and is subject to supervision by
the Federal Reserve Board. As a bank holding company, the Company is required to
file with the Federal Reserve Board an annual report and such other additional
information as the Federal Reserve Board may require pursuant to the BHCA. The
Federal Reserve Board may also make examinations of the Company and each of its
subsidiaries.
BHCA - Activities and other Limitations. The BHCA requires approval of the
Federal Reserve Board for, among other things, the acquisition by a proposed
bank holding company of control of more than five percent (5%) of the voting
shares, or substantially all the assets, of any bank or the merger or
consolidation by a bank holding company with another bank holding company. The
BHCA also generally permits the acquisition by a bank holding company of control
or substantially all the assets of any bank located in a state other than the
home state of the bank holding company, except where the bank has not been in
existence for the minimum period of time required by state law, but if the bank
is at least 5 years old, the Federal Reserve Board may approve the acquisition.
Under current law, with certain limited exceptions, a bank holding company is
prohibited from acquiring control of any voting shares of any company which is
not a bank or bank holding company and from engaging directly or indirectly in
any activity other than banking or managing or controlling banks or furnishing
services to or performing service for its authorized subsidiaries. A bank
holding company may, however, engage in or acquire an interest in, a company
that engages in activities which the Federal Reserve Board has determined by
order or regulation to be so closely related to banking or managing or
controlling banks as to be properly incident thereto. In making such a
determination, the Federal Reserve Board is required to consider whether the
performance of such activities can reasonably be expected to produce benefits to
the public, such as convenience, increased competition or gains in efficiency,
which outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest or unsound
banking practices. The Federal Reserve Board is also empowered to differentiate
between activities commenced de novo and activities commenced by the
acquisition, in whole or in part, of a going concern. Some of the activities
that the Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation to be closely
related to banking include making or servicing loans, performing certain data
processing services, acting as a fiduciary or investment or financial advisor,
and making investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote
community welfare.
Effective on March 11, 2000, the Gramm Leach Bliley Act of 1999 (the "GLB Act")
allows a bank holding company or other company to certify status as a financial
holding company, which allows such company to engage in activities that are
financial in nature, that are incidental to such activities, or are
complementary to such activities. The GLB Act enumerates certain activities that
are deemed financial in nature, such as underwriting insurance or acting as an
insurance principal, agent or broker, underwriting, dealing in or making markets
in securities, and engaging in merchant banking under certain restrictions. It
also authorizes the Federal Reserve Board to determine by regulation what other
activities are financial in nature, or incidental or complementary thereto.
Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions
imposed by the Federal Reserve Act on any extensions of credit to the bank
company or any of its subsidiaries, or investments in the stock or other
securities thereof, and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral
for loans to any borrower. Further, a holding company and any subsidiary bank
are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with
the extension of credit. A subsidiary bank may not extend credit, lease or sell
property, or furnish any services, or fix or vary the consideration for any of
the foregoing on the condition that: (i) the customer obtain or provide some
additional credit, property or services from or to such bank other than a loan,
discount, deposit or trust service; (ii) the customer obtain or provide some
additional credit, property or service from or to company or any other
subsidiary of the company; or (iii) the customer not obtain some other credit,
property or service from competitors, except for reasonable requirements to
assure the soundness of credit extended.
50
Commitments to Subsidiary Banks. Under Federal Reserve policy, the Company is
expected to act as a source of financial strength to the Bank and to commit
resources to support the Bank in circumstances when it might not do so absent
such policy.
Limitations of Acquisitions of Common Stock. The federal Change in Bank Control
Act prohibits a person or group from acquiring "control" of a bank holding
company unless the Federal Reserve has been given 60 days' prior written notice
of such proposed acquisition and within that time period the Federal Reserve
Board has not issued a notice disapproving the proposed acquisition or extending
for up to another 30 days the period during which such a disapproval may be
issued. An acquisition may be made prior to expiration of the disapproval period
if the Federal Reserve issues written notice of its intent not to disapprove the
action. Under a rebuttable presumption established by the Federal Reserve, the
acquisition of 10% or more of a class of voting stock of a bank holding company
with a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act or
which would represent the single largest interest in the voting stock would,
under the circumstances set forth in the presumption, constitute the acquisition
of control.
In addition, with limited exceptions, any "company" would be required to obtain
the approval of the Federal Reserve under the BHCA before acquiring 25% (5% in
the case of an acquirer that is a bank holding company) or more of the
outstanding Common Stock of, or such lesser number of shares as constitute
control over, the Company. Such approval would be contingent upon, among other
things, the acquirer registering as a bank holding company, divesting all
impermissible holdings and ceasing any activities not permissible for a bank
holding company.
The Federal Reserve has adopted capital adequacy guidelines pursuant to which it
assesses the adequacy of an institution's capital. These guidelines are
substantially similar to those which are applicable to the Bank, discussed
below.
The Bank. The Bank, as a Virginia chartered commercial bank which is a member of
the Federal Reserve System (a "state member bank") and whose accounts are
insured by the Bank Insurance Fund of the FDIC up to the maximum legal limits of
the FDIC, is subject to regulation, supervision and regular examination by the
Bureau of Financial Institutions and the Federal Reserve Board. The regulations
of these various agencies govern most aspects of the Bank's business, including
required reserves against deposits, loans, investments, mergers and
acquisitions, borrowing, dividends and location and number of branch offices.
The laws and regulations governing the Bank generally have been promulgated to
protect depositors and the deposit insurance funds, and not for the purpose of
protecting stockholders.
Competition among commercial banks, savings banks, and credit unions has
increased following enactment of legislation which greatly expanded the ability
of banks and bank holding companies to engage in interstate banking or
acquisition activities. As a result of federal and state legislation, banks in
the Washington DC/Maryland/Virginia area can, subject to limited restrictions,
acquire or merge with a bank in another of the jurisdictions, and can branch de
novo in any of the jurisdictions. The GLB Act allows a wider array of companies
to own banks, which could result in companies with resources substantially in
excess of the Company's entering into competition with the Company and the Bank.
Branching and Interstate Banking. The federal banking agencies are authorized to
approve interstate bank merger transactions without regard to whether such
transaction is prohibited by the law of any state, unless the home state of one
of the banks has opted out of the interstate bank merger provisions of the
Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the
"Riegle-Neal Act") by adopting a law after the date of enactment of the
Riegle-Neal Act and prior to June 1, 1997 which applies equally to all
out-of-state banks and expressly prohibits merger transactions involving
out-of-state banks. Interstate acquisitions of branches are permitted only if
the law of the state in which the branch is located permits such acquisitions.
Such interstate bank mergers and branch acquisitions are also subject to the
nationwide and statewide insured deposit concentration limitations described in
the Riegle-Neal Act.
The Riegle-Neal Act authorizes the federal banking agencies to approve
interstate branching de novo by national and state banks in states which
specifically allow for such branching. The District of Columbia, Maryland and
Virginia have all enacted laws which permit interstate acquisitions of banks and
bank branches and permit out-of-state banks to establish de novo branches.
51
Capital Adequacy Guidelines. The Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have adopted
risk based capital adequacy guidelines pursuant to which they assess the
adequacy of capital in examining and supervising banks and bank holding
companies and in analyzing bank regulatory applications. Risk-based capital
requirements determine the adequacy of capital based on the risk inherent in
various classes of assets and off-balance sheet items.
State member banks are expected to meet a minimum ratio of total qualifying
capital (the sum of core capital (Tier 1) and supplementary capital (Tier 2)) to
risk weighted assets of 8%. At least half of this amount (4%) should be in the
form of core capital.
Tier 1 Capital generally consists of the sum of common stockholders' equity and
perpetual preferred stock (subject in the case of the latter to limitations on
the kind and amount of such stock which may be included as Tier 1 Capital), less
goodwill, without adjustment for changes in the market value of securities
classified as "available for sale" in accordance with FAS 115. Tier 2 Capital
consists of the following: hybrid capital instruments; perpetual preferred stock
which is not otherwise eligible to be included as Tier 1 Capital; term
subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock; and, subject to
limitations, general allowances for loan losses. Assets are adjusted under the
risk-based guidelines to take into account different risk characteristics, with
the categories ranging from 0% (requiring no risk-based capital) for assets such
as cash and certain U.S. government and agency securities, to 100% for the bulk
of assets which are typically held by a bank holding company, including
commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans and consumer loans.
Residential first mortgage loans on one to four family residential real estate
and certain seasoned multi-family residential real estate loans, which are not
90 days or more past-due or non-performing and which have been made in
accordance with prudent underwriting standards are assigned a 50% level in the
risk-weighing system, as are certain privately-issued mortgage-backed securities
representing indirect ownership of such loans. Off-balance sheet items also are
adjusted to take into account certain risk characteristics.
In addition to the risk-based capital requirements, the Federal Reserve Board
has established a minimum 3.0% Leverage Capital Ratio (Tier 1 Capital to total
adjusted assets) requirement for the most highly-rated banks, with an additional
cushion of at least 100 to 200 basis points for all other banks, which
effectively increases the minimum Leverage Capital Ratio for such other banks to
4.0% - 5.0% or more. The highest-rated banks are those that are not anticipating
or experiencing significant growth and have well diversified risk, including no
undue interest rate risk exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good
earnings and, in general, those which are considered a strong banking
organization. A bank having less than the minimum Leverage Capital Ratio
requirement shall, within 60 days of the date as of which it fails to comply
with such requirement, submit a reasonable plan describing the means and timing
by which the bank shall achieve its minimum Leverage Capital Ratio requirement.
A bank which fails to file such plan is deemed to be operating in an unsafe and
unsound manner, and could subject a bank to a cease-and-desist order. Any
insured depository institution with a Leverage Capital Ratio that is less than
2.0% is deemed to be operating in an unsafe or unsound condition pursuant to
Section 8(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the "FDIA") and is subject to
potential termination of deposit insurance. However, such an institution will
not be subject to an enforcement proceeding solely on account of its capital
ratios, if it has entered into and is in compliance with a written agreement to
increase its Leverage Capital Ratio and to take such other action as may be
necessary for the institution to be operated in a safe and sound manner. The
capital regulations also provide, among other things, for the issuance of a
capital directive, which is a final order issued to a bank that fails to
maintain minimum capital or to restore its capital to the minimum capital
requirement within a specified time period. Such directive is enforceable in the
same manner as a final cease-and-desist order.
At December 31, 2002, the Bank's Tier 1 risk based capital ratio was 6.69%, its
Total risk based capital ratio was 10.33% and its Leverage Capital ratio was
5.72%. At December 31, 2002, the Company's Tier 1 Capital was 10.03%, its Total
Capital was 11.89% and its Leverage Capital ratio was 8.52%.
Prompt Corrective Action. Under Section 38 of the FDIA, each federal banking
agency is required to implement a system of prompt corrective action for
institutions which it regulates. The federal banking agencies have promulgated
substantially similar regulations to implement the system of prompt corrective
action established by Section 38 of the FDIA. Under the regulations, a bank
shall be deemed to be: (i) "well capitalized" if it has a Total Risk Based
Capital Ratio of 10.0% or more, a Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio of 6.0% or
more, a Leverage Capital Ratio of 5.0% or more and is not subject to any written
capital order or directive; (ii) "adequately capitalized" if it has a Total Risk
Based Capital Ratio of 8.0% or more, a Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio of 4.0%
or more and a Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio of 4.0% or more (3.0% under certain
circumstances) and does not meet the definition of "well capitalized;" (iii)
"undercapitalized" if it has a Total Risk Based Capital Ratio that is less than
8.0%, a Tier 1 Risk based Capital Ratio that is less than 4.0% or a Leverage
Capital Ratio that is less than 4.0% (3.0% under certain circumstances); (iv)
"significantly undercapitalized" if it has a Total Risk Based Capital Ratio that
is less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 Risk Based Capital Ratio that is less than 3.0% or a
Leverage Capital Ratio that is less than 3.0%; and (v) "critically
undercapitalized" if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is
equal to or less than 2.0%.
52
An institution generally must file a written capital restoration plan which
meets specified requirements with an appropriate federal banking agency within
45 days of the date the institution receives notice or is deemed to have notice
that it is undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized or critically
undercapitalized. A federal banking agency must provide the institution with
written notice of approval or disapproval within 60 days after receiving a
capital restoration plan, subject to extensions by the applicable agency.
An institution which is required to submit a capital restoration plan must
concurrently submit a performance guaranty by each company that controls the
institution. Such guaranty shall be limited to the lesser of (i) an amount equal
to 5.0% of the institution's total assets at the time the institution was
notified or deemed to have notice that it was undercapitalized or (ii) the
amount necessary at such time to restore the relevant capital measures of the
institution to the levels required for the institution to be classified as
adequately capitalized. Such a guaranty shall expire after the federal banking
agency notifies the institution that it has remained adequately capitalized for
each of four consecutive calendar quarters. An institution which fails to submit
a written capital restoration plan within the requisite period, including any
required performance guaranty, or fails in any material respect to implement a
capital restoration plan, shall be subject to the restrictions in Section 38 of
the FDIA which are applicable to significantly undercapitalized institutions. At
December 31, 2001, the Bank was considered to be a "well capitalized"
institution for purposes of Section 38 of the FDIA.
A "critically undercapitalized institution" is to be placed in conservatorship
or receivership within 90 days unless the FDIC formally determines that
forbearance from such action would better protect the deposit insurance fund.
Unless the FDIC or other appropriate federal banking regulatory agency makes
specific further findings and certifies that the institution is viable and is
not expected to fail, an institution that remains critically undercapitalized on
average during the fourth calendar quarter after the date it becomes critically
undercapitalized must be placed in receivership. The general rule is that the
FDIC will be appointed as receiver within 90 days after a bank becomes
critically undercapitalized unless extremely good cause is shown and an
extension is agreed to by the federal regulators. In general, good cause is
defined as capital which has been raised and is imminently available for
infusion into the bank except for certain technical requirements which may delay
the infusion for a period of time beyond the 90 day time period.
Immediately upon becoming undercapitalized, an institution shall become subject
to the provisions of Section 38 of the FDIA, which (i) restrict payment of
capital distributions and management fees; (ii) require that the appropriate
federal banking agency monitor the condition of the institution and its efforts
to restore its capital; (iii) require submission of a capital restoration plan;
(iv) restrict the growth of the institution's assets; and (v) require prior
approval of certain expansion proposals. The appropriate federal banking agency
for an undercapitalized institution also may take any number of discretionary
supervisory actions if the agency determines that any of these actions is
necessary to resolve the problems of the institution at the least possible
long-term cost to the deposit insurance fund, subject in certain cases to
specified procedures. These discretionary supervisory actions include: requiring
the institution to raise additional capital; restricting transactions with
affiliates; requiring divestiture of the institution or the sale of the
institution to a willing purchaser; and any other supervisory action that the
agency deems appropriate. These and additional mandatory and permissive
supervisory actions may be taken with respect to significantly undercapitalized
and critically undercapitalized institutions.
Additionally, under Section 11(c)(5) of the FDIA, a conservator or receiver may
be appointed for an institution where: (i) an institution's obligations exceed
its assets; (ii) there is substantial dissipation of the institution's assets or
earnings as a result of any violation of law or any unsafe or unsound practice;
(iii) the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition; (iv) there is a
willful violation of a cease-and-desist order; (v) the institution is unable to
pay its obligations in the ordinary course of business; (vi) losses or
threatened losses deplete all or substantially all of an institution's capital,
and there is no reasonable prospect of becoming "adequately capitalized" without
assistance; (vii) there is any violation of law or unsafe or unsound practice or
condition that is likely to cause insolvency or substantial dissipation of
assets or earnings, weaken the institution's condition, or otherwise seriously
prejudice the interests of depositors or the insurance fund; (viii) an
institution ceases to be insured; (ix) the institution is undercapitalized and
has no reasonable prospect that it will become adequately capitalized, fails to
become adequately capitalized when required to do so, or fails to submit or
materially implement a capital restoration plan; or (x) the institution is
critically undercapitalized or otherwise has substantially insufficient capital.
53
Regulatory Enforcement Authority. Federal banking law grants substantial
enforcement powers to federal banking regulators. This enforcement authority
includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to
issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions
against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties. In general,
these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and
regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may
provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely
reports filed with regulatory authorities.
Deposit Insurance Premiums. The FDIA establishes a risk based deposit insurance
assessment system. Under applicable regulations, deposit premium assessments are
determined based upon a matrix formed utilizing capital categories - well
capitalized, adequately capitalized and undercapitalized - defined in the same
manner as those categories are defined for purposes of Section 38 of the FDIA.
Each of these groups is then divided into three subgroups which reflect varying
levels of supervisory concern, from those which are considered healthy to those
which are considered to be of substantial supervisory concern. The matrix so
created results in nine assessment risk classifications, with rates ranging from
0.04% of insured deposits for well capitalized institutions having the lowest
level of supervisory concern, to 0.31% of insured deposits for undercapitalized
institutions having the highest level of supervisory concern. In general, while
the Bank Insurance Fund of the FDIC ("BIF") maintains a reserve ratio of 1.25%
or greater, no deposit insurance premiums are required. When the BIF reserve
ratio falls below that level, all insured banks would be required to pay
premiums.
PROPERTIES
The Bank offers its services from its main office, located at 5350 Lee Highway
in Arlington, Virginia, and twelve additional banking offices, and its bank
operations center. The main office consists of two connected red brick
buildings, contains an aggregate of approximately 18,000 square feet of space on
three levels. The Bank utilizes one of the buildings, containing approximately
10,000 square feet, as the executive offices and a branch facility. In August
1995, the Bank sold the connected building which it had previously leased out.
The Bank operates a branch located at 2930 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington,
Virginia. That property, which consists of a stand alone brick building
containing approximately 2,400 square feet on a parcel of approximately 18,087
square feet, was purchased by the Bank in April 1997. The Bank also operates a
branch location at 5140 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia. That property, which
consists of a two story brick building containing approximately 4,800 square
feet on a parcel of approximately 16,800 square feet, was also purchased by the
Bank in April 1997.
The Bank leases ten locations: the Alexandria Office, located at 1414 Prince
Street, Alexandria, Virginia, consists of 2,500 square feet; the McLean Office,
located at 1356 Chain Bridge Road, McLean, Virginia, consists of 1,625 square
feet; the Williamsburg Boulevard Office, located at 6500 Williamsburg Road,
Arlington, Virginia, consists of 1,781 square feet; the Annandale Office,
located at 4230 John Marr Drive, Annandale, Virginia, consists of 2,400 square
feet; the Fairfax Office, located at 10777 Main Street, Fairfax Virginia,
consists of 2,038 square feet; the Vienna Office, located at 374 Maple Avenue,
Vienna, Virginia, consists of 5,831 square feet; the King Street Office, located
at 506 King Street, Alexandria Virginia, consists of 1,484 square feet; the
Chantilly Office, located at 13881 G Metrotech Drive, Chantilly Virginia,
consists of 1,950 square feet; the Lake Ridge office, located at 2030 Old Bridge
Road, Lake Ridge, Virginia consists of 2,492 square feet; the Reston Office,
located at 11820 Spectrum Center, Reston Virginia consists of 3,700 square feet,
and the Bank's operations center, located at 14201 Sullyfield Circle, Chantilly,
Virginia consists of 14,756 square feet. Generally the leases contain renewal
option clauses for one or two additional five-year terms, and in some instances
require payment of certain operating charges. The total rental expense under the
leases was $1.2 million in 2002. The total minimum rental commitment under the
leases as of December 31, 2002 is as follows: $1.1 million for 2003; $1.0
million for 2004 and 2005, $604 thousand for 2006, $612 thousand for 2007 and
$1.9 million for 2008 and beyond.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Within the ninety days prior to the filing of this report, the Company's
management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of
the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined in Rule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were adequate. There were
no significant changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses) in the Company's internal controls or in
other factors subsequent to the date of the evaluation that would significantly
affect those controls.
54
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
The following financial statements are included in this report:
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2001 and 2002
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31,
2000, 2001 and 2002 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years
ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 Consolidated Statements of
Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2000,
2001 and 2002
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Auditors
All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the required information
is either inapplicable or included in the consolidated financial statements or
related notes. Exhibits
Exhibit No. Description
----------- -----------
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (1)
3.2 Bylaws of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (1)
4.1 Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of November 15, 2002
between Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and The Bank of New
York, as Trustee (2)
4.2 Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of November
15, 2002 among Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc., The Bank of New
York, as Property Trustee, The Bank of New York (Delaware), as
Delaware Trustee, and Peter A. Converse, William K. Beauchesne
and Marcia J. Hopkins as Administrative Trustees (2)
4.3 Guarantee Agreement dated as of November 15, 2002, between
Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as
Guarantee Trustee (2)
4.4 Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of December 19, 2002
between Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and The Bank of New
York, as Indenture Trustee (2)
4.5 Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of December
19, 2002 among Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc., The Bank of New
York, as Property Trustee, The Bank of New York (Delaware), as
Delaware Trustee, and Peter A. Converse, William K. Beauchesne
and Marcia J. Hopkins as Administrative Trustees (2)
4.6 Guarantee Agreement dated as of December 19, 2002, between
Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as
Guarantee Trustee (2)
10.1 1998 Stock Option Plan (1)
11 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings See Note 8
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
21 Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23 Consent of Yount, Hyde & Barbour, PC, Independent Auditors
(1) Incorporated by reference to the same numbered exhibit to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,1999.
(2) Not filed in accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of
Regulation S-K. Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. agrees to provide a copy of
these documents to the Commission upon request.
Reports on Form 8-K
On October 8, 2002, the Company filed a current report on form 8-K, under item 5
thereof, reflecting the announcement of earnings for the period ended September
30, 2002.
On December 19, 2002, the Company filed a current report on form 8-K, under item
5 thereof, reflecting the announcement of the private placement issuance of $3.0
million and $15.0 million in trust preferred securities through two newly formed
wholly-owned subsidiary trusts, VCBI Capital Trust I and VCBI Capital Trust II.
55
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
VIRGINIA COMMERCE BANCORP, INC.
By: /s/ Peter A. Converse
------------------------------------
Peter A. Converse, President
Dated: March 17, 2003
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NAME CAPACITY DATE
/s/ Leonard Adler Director March 17, 2003
- ------------------------------------
Leonard Adler
/s/ Peter A. Converse
- ------------------------------------ Director, President and Chief Executive March 17, 2003
Peter A. Converse Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/Frank L. Cowles, Jr. Director March 14, 2003
- ------------------------------------
Frank L. Cowles, Jr.
/s/ W. Douglas Fisher Chairman of the Board of Directors March 17, 2003
- ------------------------------------
W. Douglas Fisher
/s/ David M. Guernsey Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors March 17, 2003
- ------------------------------------
David M. Guernsey
/s/ Robert H. L'Hommedieu Director March 17, 2003
- ------------------------------------
Robert H. L'Hommedieu
/s/ Norris E. Mitchell Director March 14, 2003
- ------------------------------------
Norris E. Mitchell
/s/ Arthur L. Walters Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors March 14, 2003
- ------------------------------------
Arthur L. Walters
/s/ William K. Beauchesne Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer March 17, 2003
- ------------------------------------ (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
William K. Beauchesne
56
CERTIFICATION
I, Peter A. Converse , certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Virginia Commerce Bancorp,
Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 17, 2003 /s/ Peter A. Converse
---------------------------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
57
CERTIFICATION
I, William K. Beauchesne, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Virginia Commerce Bancorp,
Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 17, 2003 /s/ William K. Beauchesne
-------------------------------------
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
58
EXHIBIT 21
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Legal Name of Entity Jurisdiction of Organization Ownership Interest
- ---------------------------------------------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------
Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc (registrant) Virginia
Virginia Commerce Bank Virginia 100%
Northeast Land and Development Corp Virginia 100%
VCBI Capital Trust I Delaware 100% of voting securities
VCBI Capital Trust II Delaware 100% of voting securities
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K of Virginia
Commerce Bancorp, Inc. and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
333-68576, 333-68578 and 333-68580) of our report, dated February 13, 2003,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.
/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, PC
Winchester, Virginia
March 17, 2003
EXHIBIT 99(a)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the Form 10-K of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Peter A. Converse , President and Chief
Executive Officer of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
/s/ Peter A. Converse
- --------------------------------------------
Peter A. Converse
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99(b)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
In connection with the Form 10-K of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 2002, I, William K. Beauchesne, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
(1) such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
(2) the information contained in such Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Virginia Commerce Bancorp, Inc.
/s/ William K. Beauchesne
- ---------------------------------------------
William K. Beauchesne
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer