SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 1-3677

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes Ö No ____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes Ö No ____

At May 6, 2004, the registrant had 368,033,196 shares of common stock (without nominal or par value) outstanding.

In this report, all dollar amounts are stated in U.S. dollars and all quantities in metric tons, or tonnes, unless indicated otherwise. A tonne is 1,000 kilograms, or 2,204.6 pounds. The word "Company" refers to Alcan Inc. and, where applicable, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries.

Item 1. Financial Statements

-2-

-3-

CONTENTS

-4-

CONTENTS

* Excludes the non-cash impact of common shares issued in exchange for Pechiney Securities. See note 14 - Sales and Acquisitions of Businesses

-5-

CONTENTS

-6-

CONTENTS

The Company has adopted U.S. GAAP to enhance its communication with its shareholders, improve comparability of financial information with its competitors and peer group, and promote a common financial language within Alcan.

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are based upon accounting policies and methods of their application consistent with those used and described in the Company's annual financial statements and described below. The interim financial statements do not include all of the financial statement disclosures included in the annual financial statements and therefore should be read in conjunction with the most recent annual financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. Note 16 - - Differences between United States and Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), provides an explanation and reconciliation of differences between U.S. and Canadian GAAP.

In the opinion of management of the Company, the unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which consist only of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and the results of operations and cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, applied on a consistent basis.

On December 15, 2003, Alcan acquired Pechiney. Pechiney refers to Pechiney, a French société anonyme, and where applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries. The interim consolidated financial statements as at and for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 include the operations of Pechiney. The financial statements as at December 31, 2003 include only the balance sheet of Pechiney. The interim consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 do not include the operations of Pechiney.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. These may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. They may also affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of subsidiaries that are controlled by Alcan, all of which are majority owned. Investments in entities over which Alcan has significant influence are accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, Alcan's investment is increased or decreased by Alcan's share of the undistributed net income or loss and deferred translation adjustments since acquisition. Investments in joint ventures over which Alcan has an undivided interest in the assets and liabilities are proportionately consolidated to the extent of Alcan's participation. All other investments in joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method. Other investments are accounted for using the cost method. Intercompany balances and transactions, including profits in inventories, are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.

All business combinations are accounted for under the purchase method.

-7-

CONTENTS

2.   ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd)

The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, whose functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar (located principally in Europe and Asia), are translated into U.S. dollars at the period end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Differences arising from exchange rate changes are included in the Deferred translation adjustments (DTA) component of Accumulated other comprehensive income. If there is a reduction in the Company's ownership in a foreign operation, the relevant portion of DTA is recognized in Other expenses (income) - net. All other operations, including most of those in Canada, have the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. Monetary items denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated at period end exchange rates and translation gains and losses are included in income. Non-monetary items are translated at historical rates.

The Company has entered into foreign currency contracts and options to hedge certain future, identifiable foreign currency revenue and operating cost exposures. All such contracts are reported at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For contracts qualifying as cash flow hedges, changes in fair value are recorded in Other comprehensive income and are transferred to Sales and operating revenues, Cost of sales and operating expenses, or Depreciation and amortization, as applicable, concurrently with the recognition of the item being hedged. For contracts qualifying as fair value hedges, changes in fair value are recorded in the statement of income together with the changes in the fair value of the hedged item. For contracts not qualifying as hedges, changes in fair value are recorded in Other expenses (income) - net.

Foreign currency forward contracts and swaps are also used to hedge certain foreign currency denominated debt and intercompany foreign currency denominated loans. Changes in the fair value of these contracts are recorded in other expenses (income) - net concurrently with the changes in the fair value of the foreign currency denominated debt and intercompany foreign currency denominated loans being hedged.

The Company has entered into forward exchange contracts to hedge certain foreign currency denominated net equity investments. All such contracts are reported at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value are reported in the DTA component of Accumulated other comprehensive income concurrently with changes in the fair value of the equity being hedged. If there is a reduction in the Company's ownership in a foreign operation, the relevant portion of DTA is recognized in Other expenses (income) - net.

Revenue from product sales, net of trade discounts and allowances, is recognized once delivery has occurred provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Delivery is considered to have occurred when title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer. Revenue from services is recognized as services are rendered and accepted by the customer.

Amounts charged to customers related to shipping and handling are included in Sales and operating revenues, and related shipping and handling costs are recorded in Cost of sales and operating expenses.

Generally, all of the forward metal contracts and options serve to hedge certain future identifiable aluminum price exposures. For these contracts, the fair values of the derivatives are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For contracts qualifying as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the changes in fair value are recorded in Other comprehensive income and are reclassified, together with related hedging costs, to Sales and operating revenues or Cost of sales and operating expenses, concurrently with the recognition of the underlying item being hedged or in the period that the derivatives no longer qualify as cash flow hedges.

-8-

CONTENTS

2.   ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd)

All oil and natural gas futures contracts, swaps and options are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet. For contracts qualifying as cash flow hedges, the effective portions of the changes in fair value are recorded in Other comprehensive income and are classified to the statement of income concurrently with the recognition of the underlying item being hedged. For contracts not qualifying for hedge accounting, changes in fair value are recorded in Other expenses (income) - net.

Physical metals purchase and sale contracts with third parties and related forward metal contracts are considered to be derivatives held for trading purposes and are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet. Changes in fair value are recorded on a net basis in Sales and operating revenues.

In circumstances where the Company's purchase or sales contracts for a commodity contain derivative characteristics, these contracts are generally not recorded at fair value as they involve quantities that are expected to be used or sold in the normal course of business over a reasonable period of time.

Aluminum, raw materials and packaging products, other supplies and Pechiney inventories are stated at cost (determined for the most part on the monthly average cost method) or net realizable value, whichever is lower.

The Company capitalizes interest costs associated with the financing of major capital expenditures up to the time the asset is ready for its intended use.

When the Company sells certain receivables, it retains servicing rights and provides limited recourse, which constitute retained interests in the sold receivables. No servicing asset or liability is recognized in the financial statements as the fees received by the Company reflect the fair value of the cost of servicing these receivables. The related purchase discount is included in Other expenses (income) - net.

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost. Additions, improvements and major renewals are capitalized; normal maintenance and repair costs are expensed. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of these assets is not recoverable and exceeds their fair value. Depreciation is calculated on the straight-line method using rates based on the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. The principal rates range from 2% to 10% for buildings and structures, 1% to 4% for power assets and 3% to 20% for chemical, smelter and fabricating assets. Gains or losses from the sale of assets are included in Other expenses (income) - - net.

The Company reviews its long-lived assets and amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows expected from the asset. Any impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value. Such evaluations for impairment are significantly impacted by estimates of future prices for the Company's product, capital needs, economic trends in the market and other factors. Quoted market values are used whenever available to estimate fair value. When quoted market values are unavailable, the fair value of the long-lived asset is generally based on estimates of discounted expected net cash flows. Assets to be disposed of by sale are reflected at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and are not depreciated while classified as held for sale.

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis at the reporting unit level and is also tested for impairment when events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below the carrying value. Fair value is determined using discounted cash flows.

Environmental liabilities for legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset that result from its acquisition, construction, development or normal operation are recognized at their fair values when incurred and a corresponding asset retirement cost is added to the carrying amount of the related asset. In subsequent periods, the carrying amount of the liability is adjusted to reflect the passage of time and any changes in the timing or amount of the underlying future cash flows. The asset retirement cost is amortized to expense over the asset's useful life.

Environmental liabilities that are not legal asset retirement obligations are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Environmental expenditures of a capital nature that extend the life, increase the capacity or improve the safety of an asset or that mitigate or prevent environmental contamination that has yet to occur are included in Property, plant and equipment and are depreciated generally over the remaining useful life of the underlying asset. Expenditures relating to existing conditions caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to future revenues, are expensed when probable and estimable and are normally included in Cost of sales and operating expenses except for large, unusual amounts, which are included in Other expenses (income) - - net. Recoveries relating to environmental liabilities are recorded when received.

Using appropriate actuarial methods and assumptions, the Company's defined benefit pension plans are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers' Accounting for Pensions. The post-retirement benefits are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 106, Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions. Pension and post-retirement benefit obligations are actuarially calculated using management's best estimates and based on expected service period, salary increases and retirement ages of employees. Pension and post-retirement benefit expense includes the actuarially computed cost of benefits earned during the current service period, the interest cost on accrued obligations, the expected return on plan assets based on fair market value and the straight-line amortization of net actuarial gains and losses and adjustments due to plan amendments. All net actuarial gains and losses are amortized over the expected average remaining service life of the employees.

The Company accounts for its stock options granted under the share option plan using the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Under the fair value method, stock-based compensation expense is recognized in the statement of income over the applicable vesting period. When stock options are exercised, the consideration paid by employees, together with the applicable amount in additional paid-in capital, is credited to common shares. Other stock-based compensation arrangements, that can be settled in cash and are based on the change in the common share price during the period, are recognized in income over the vesting period of awards. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded in Selling, administrative and general expenses on the statement of income.

2.   ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont'd)

Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method. Under the liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

This method also requires the recognition of future tax benefits such as net operating loss carryforwards, to the extent that realization of such benefits is more likely than not. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

All time deposits have original maturities of 90 days or less and qualify as cash equivalents.

The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the trade receivables balance. Management determines the allowance based on known doubtful accounts, historical experience, and other currently available evidence.

The Company follows the recognition and measurement provisions of the FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. The provisions are applied on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. Under FIN 45, guarantees issued after December 31, 2002, are recorded as a liability equal to the fair value of the obligation at the inception of the guarantee. See note 12 - - Commitments and Contingencies.

On January 1, 2003, the Company retroactively adopted SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. Under SFAS No. 143, the Company recognized additional liabilities, at fair value, of approximately $106 as at January 1, 2003, for existing legal asset retirement obligations. Such liabilities are adjusted for accretion costs and revisions in estimated cash flows. The related asset retirement costs are capitalized as increases to the carrying amount of the associated long-lived assets and accumulated depreciation on these capitalized costs is recognized. These liabilities consist primarily of environmental remediation costs, resulting from normal operations, associated with certain bauxite residue disposal sites at its alumina refineries and the disposal of certain of its spent potlining associated with smelter facilities. An after-tax charge of $39 for the cumulative effect of accounting change was recorded as a result of the new standard, relating primarily to costs for spent potlining disposal for pots currently in operation.

Effective January 1, 2004, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Under the retroactive restatement method selected by the Company as described in SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, compensation cost recognized in the statement of income for the first quarter of 2004 is the same as that which would have been recognized had the fair value method of SFAS No. 123 been applied from its original effective date. All prior periods presented have been restated to reflect compensation cost as if the fair value method had been applied from the original effective date of SFAS No. 123.

The impact of the adoption of the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation was an increase in stock-based compensation expense of $2 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 (2003: $2). The impact as at January 1, 2003 was an increase in additional paid-in capital of $42, an increase in common shares of $28, and a decrease in retained earnings of $70. The earnings per common share impact of this restatement is a reduction of $0.01 per share for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 (2003: $0.01).

In the second quarter of 2003, the Company committed to a plan to sell certain non-strategic Packaging operations, as the businesses are not part of its core operations. These businesses are classified as held for sale and are included in discontinued operations. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recorded the sale of Fibrenyle, one of the non-strategic Packaging operations, in the U.K. for proceeds of $29. The remaining divestments are expected to be completed by June 30, 2004.

In December 2003, the Company classified in discontinued operations its extrusions operations in Milan, Italy (Engineered Products). These operations had been classified as held and used until their sale in December 2003. On December 31, 2003, the Company classified the aluminum rolling mill in Ravenswood, West Virginia, as held for sale. Ravenswood was acquired through the acquisition of Pechiney. Its divestment, which must be completed by July 5, 2004, subject to an additional 30-day extension granted at the discretion of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), is part of the requirements imposed by the DOJ as a condition to its approval of the acquisition.

Fair values were determined based on either discounted cash flows or expected selling price. Certain financial information has been reclassified in the prior periods to present these businesses as discontinued operations on the statement of income, as assets held for sale and liabilities of operations held for sale on the balance sheet and as cash flows from (used for) discontinued operations on the statement of cash flows.

An impairment charge of $5 and $1 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, was recorded in discontinued operations to reduce the carrying values of these businesses to estimated fair values less costs to sell.

Selected financial information for the businesses included in discontinued operations is reported below:

The major classes of Assets held for sale and Liabilities of operations held for sale are as follows:

-12-

CONTENTS

4.   DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND ASSETS HELD FOR SALE (cont'd)

Basic and diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. The treasury stock method for calculating the dilutive impact of stock options is used. The following table outlines the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share on income from continuing operations.

In the first quarter of 2004, options to purchase 353,000 common shares (2003: 6,231,283) at a weighted average grant price of CAN$64.25 per share (2003: CAN$49.16) were outstanding during the period but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options' exercise price was greater than the average price of the common shares.

As at March 31, 2004, there were 368,002,482 (2003: 321,642,094) common shares outstanding.

In 2001, the Company implemented a restructuring program aimed at safeguarding its competitiveness, resulting in a series of plant sales, closures and divestments throughout the organization. In context of the Company's objective of value maximization, a detailed business portfolio review was undertaken in 2001 to identify high cost operations, excess capacity and non-core products. Impairment charges arose as a result of negative projected cash flows and recurring losses. These charges related principally to buildings, machinery and equipment and some previously capitalized project costs. This program was completed in 2003. The following information relates only to the 2001 program.

The schedule provided below shows details of the provision balances and related cash payments for the restructuring and asset impairment charges relating to the 2001 restructuring program.

The remaining provision of $30 as at March 31, 2004 related principally to employee severance costs and environmental remediation for which payments will be made over an extended period.

In the first quarter of 2004, the Company recorded recoveries of $(7), pretax consisting primarily of sales of assets related to the closure of facilities at Glasgow, U.K.

In 2003, Restructuring, impairment and other special charges of $(38), pre-tax were recorded, which included recoveries in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $29 and other special charges of $9. The $29 (Q1: $(2); Q2: $16; Q3: $(5); Q4: $20) recovery consists of $3 for the reversal of an excess redundancy provision in the U.K. (Rolled Products Europe), a gain of $19 principally for the sale of the Borgofranco power facilities in Italy (Rolled Products Europe), income of $6 on the sale of extrusions operations in Malaysia (Rolled Products Americas and Asia), and a gain of $9 relating to sales of assets in the U.K. ($5: Bauxite and Alumina; $4: Packaging), partially offset by other costs of $8 principally in the U.K. (Packaging).

In 2003, the Company completed the closure of facilities at Glasgow, U.K., sold its extrusions operations in Malaysia for net proceeds of $2 and decided to retain the recycling operations at the Borgofranco plant in Italy and both cold mills at the light gauge operations in Fairmont, West Virginia.

In 2002, Restructuring, impairment and other special charges of $60, pre-tax were recorded, which included restructuring and asset impairment charges of $79 and gains in other special charges of $19. The $79 charge consisted of severance costs of $35 related to workforce reductions of approximately 950 employees (Q1: nil; Q2: 295 employees; Q3: 315 employees; Q4: 340 employees), impairment of long-lived assets of $17 and other exit costs related to the shutdown of facilities of $27. Severance charges of $35 (Q1: nil; Q2: $14; Q3: $5; Q4: $16) related primarily to the closure of the Burntisland facility, U.K. (Bauxite and Alumina), certain cable operations in North America (Engineered Products), extrusions operations in Malaysia and light gauge operations in Fairmont, West Virginia (Rolled Products Americas and Asia). Asset impairment charges of $17 (Q1: nil; Q2: nil; Q3: $13; Q4: $4) related primarily to the Borgofranco plant in Italy (Rolled Products Europe) and the operations in Korea (Rolled Products Americas and Asia). Other exit costs of $27 (Q1: $5; Q2: $(3); Q3: $(4); Q4: $29) consisted principally of closure costs of $19 for the Burntisland facility, U.K., a loss of $5 on the sale of the extrusions operations in Thailand that arose from the realization of deferred translation losses (Rolled Products Americas and Asia), a loss of $4 on the sale of the rolled products circles production unit at Pieve, Italy (Rolled Products Europe), other costs of $3 and was offset in part by income of $4 from the write-back of excess contract loss provisions upon settlement with a customer (Engineered Products).

In 2002, the Company completed the sale of certain glass packaging operations located in Park Hills, Missouri, Mays Landing, Williamstown, and Millville, New Jersey for proceeds of $15 equal to book value. As well, the Company sold its rolled product circles production unit at its Pieve plant in Italy for proceeds of $14 and its two Pharmatech rubber stopper and aluminum seals operations located in Salisbury, Maryland, for proceeds of $9 equal to book value.

In 2001, Restructuring, impairment and other special charges of $653 pre-tax were recorded, which included restructuring and asset impairment charges of $407 and other special charges of $246. The charges of $407 included severance costs of $111, which related to workforce reductions of approximately 2,190 employees, impairment of long-lived assets of $268 and other exit costs related to the shutdown of facilities of $28.

The following presents selected information by operating segment, viewed on a stand-alone basis. The operating management structure is comprised of eight operating segments. The eight operating segments are Bauxite and Alumina; Primary Metal; Rolled Products Americas and Asia; Rolled Products Europe; Engineered Products; Packaging; Pechiney World Trade; and Segregated Businesses. The Company's measure of the profitability of its operating segments is referred to as business group profit (BGP). BGP comprises earnings before interest, income taxes, minority interests, depreciation and amortization and excludes certain items, such as corporate costs, restructuring, impairment and other special charges, and pension actuarial gains, losses and other adjustments, that are not under the control of the business groups or are not considered in the measurement of their profitability. These items are generally managed by the Company's corporate head office, which focuses on strategy development and oversees governance, policy, legal, compliance, human resources and finance matters. Transactions between operating segments are conducted on an arm's-length basis and reflect market prices. Thus, earnings from the Primary Metal group represent mainly profit on metal produced by the Company, whether sold to third parties or used in the Company's Rolled Products, Engineered Products or Packaging groups. Earnings from the Rolled Products, Engineered Products and Packaging groups represent only the fabricating profit on their respective products.

The accounting principles used to prepare the information by operating segment are the same as those used to prepare the consolidated financial statements of the Company, except for the following two items:

1. The operating segments include the Company's proportionate share of joint ventures as they are managed within each operating segment; and

2. Pension costs for the operating segments are based on the normal current service cost with all actuarial gains, losses and other adjustments being included in Intersegment and other.

Headquartered in Montreal, Canada, this group comprises Alcan's worldwide activities related to bauxite mining, alumina refining and the production and sale of specialty aluminas, owning and/or operating 21 deposits, plants, and bauxite mines in ten countries.

Also headquartered in Montreal, this group comprises smelting operations, power generation and production of primary value-added ingot in the form of sheet ingot, extrusion billet, rod and foundry ingot, as well as engineering services and trading operations for alumina and aluminum, operating or having interests in 24 smelters in 12 countries. Alcan has committed to locate in France the operational headquarters of its European primary aluminum business.

Rolled Products Americas and Asia

Headquartered in Cleveland, U.S.A., this group encompasses aluminum sheet and light gauge products, operating 16 plants and three research and development centres in five countries.

Rolled Products Europe

Headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland, this group comprises aluminum sheet, including automotive, can and lithographic sheet, plate and foil stock, operating 19 plants in seven countries.

-16-

CONTENTS

7.   INFORMATION BY OPERATING SEGMENT (cont'd)

Engineered Products

Headquartered in Neuhausen, Switzerland, this group produces fabricated aluminum products, including wire and cable, components for the mass transportation, automotive, building, display, electromechanical and other industrial markets, as well as sales and service centres throughout Europe, operating 80 plants in 18 countries. One of these plants had been excluded from the operating segment information as it has been reclassified to discontinued operations and assets held for sale. Alcan has committed to establish in France the global operational headquarters of its engineered products group.

Packaging

Headquartered in Paris, this group consists of the Company's worldwide food flexible, foil, tobacco, pharmaceutical and personal care packaging businesses, operating 182 plants in 26 countries. Four of these plants have been excluded from the operating segment information as they have been reclassified to discontinued operations and assets held for sale.

Headquartered in Paris, France, this group acts as both a sales network and a trading business. The sales network sells Pechiney (and some non-Pechiney) products to third parties. The trading business is active in aluminum, alumina, copper and ores, zinc and chemicals. This group operates through 42 entities in 60 countries.

In light of recent developments in U.S. accounting standards, Alcan has elected to report trading revenues and costs for metal contracts on a net rather than gross basis. This applies only to those third-party metal sales sourced from third parties. This accounting treatment reduced quarterly sales revenues and cost of goods sold by an estimated $1.1 billion from what they otherwise would have been under the gross method.

In connection with the Pechiney acquisition, the Company has assumed certain obligations, imposed by competition law authorities, in relation to certain assets and businesses (the "Segregated Businesses"). The Company's obligations in connection with the Segregated Businesses consist of holding and managing them under a regime that is separate and distinct from that of other assets of the Company. In order to comply with these imposed obligations, the Company has created a separate operating segment to hold these assets and businesses. The Segregated Businesses consist of the Neuf-Brisach, Rugles, and Annecy rolling mills and certain packaging operations in the aerosol cans and aluminum cartridges businesses.

This classification includes the deferral or realization of profits on intersegment sales of aluminum and alumina, corporate office costs as well as other non-operating items.

-17-

CONTENTS

7.   INFORMATION BY OPERATING SEGMENT (cont'd)

(unaudited)

-18-

CONTENTS

As described in note 3 - Accounting Changes, effective January 1, 2004, the Company retroactively adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. The Black-Scholes valuation model is used to determine the fair value of the options granted. For the first quarter of 2004, the stock-based compensation expense for options granted was $2 (2003: $2).

For the first quarter of 2004, the stock-based compensation expense for arrangements that can be settled in cash was $1 (2003: $2).

The composite of the applicable statutory corporate income tax rates in Canada is 32% (2003: 39%). Effective January 1, 2004, the general and manufacturing and processing tax rates in Canada are equivalent. Prior to 2004, the effect of the reduced tax rate on manufacturing and processing activities in Canada was disclosed as a deduction from the general tax rate.

-19-

CONTENTS

-20-

CONTENTS

12.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In 1997, as part of the claim settlement arrangements related to the British Columbia Government's cancellation of the Kemano Completion Project, the Company obtained the right to transfer a portion of a power supply contract with BC Hydro to a third party. The Company sold the right to supply this portion to Enron Power Marketing Inc. (EPMI), a subsidiary of Enron Corporation (Enron) for cash consideration. In order to obtain the consent of BC Hydro to this sale, the Company was required to retain a residual obligation for EPMI's performance under the power supply contract in the event that EPMI became unable to perform, to a maximum aggregate amount of $100, with mitigation and subrogation rights. BC Hydro assigned its rights to receive the power to BC Hydro's affiliate, Powerex Corporation (Powerex). On December 2, 2001, EPMI and Enron filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Powerex alleged that the power supply contract with EPMI w as terminated and that Powerex was owed a termination payment of more than $100. On March 22, 2002, Alcan received a demand for payment in the amount of $100 from Powerex. On January 17, 2003, an arbitrator's decision confirmed Powerex's claim for $100. In early 2003, Alcan commenced legal proceedings in the U.S. Federal Court (Oregon) seeking judicial review of the arbitration award. Powerex also commenced a proceeding in the British Columbia Supreme Court to recognize and enforce the arbitration award. On July 10, 2003, the B.C. Supreme Court stayed the British Columbia proceedings until the U.S. Federal Court had decided the various matters before it. On September 18, 2003, a Magistrate Judge of the U.S. Federal Court issued his recommendations. The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Company's motion for judicial review of the arbitration award be denied. On September 29, 2003, the Company filed an objection with the U.S. Federal Court objecting to the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge an d Powerex shortly thereafter filed a reply to the objection. On December 11, 2003, an Article 3 judge of the U.S. Federal Court adopted the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. On January 9, 2004, Alcan filed an appeal of that decision with the U.S. Federal Court of Appeal (9^th Circuit). On April 7, 2004, Powerex proceeded with a 2-day hearing in the B.C. Supreme Court of its petition to, among other things, recognize and enforce the January 17, 2003 arbitration award. Alcan asked the court to deny or adjourn the petition pending the completion of the U.S. court proceedings. A decision of the B.C. Supreme Court is pending. A provision of $100 pre-tax was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2002.

On January 20, 2004, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and affiliated entities (Kaiser) filed a motion before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware seeking to reject the five-year alumina supply agreement between Kaiser Aluminum International, Inc. and Pechiney Trading Company (PTC). The agreement provides for the supply of 300,000 tonnes of alumina a year to PTC, from January 2002 to the end of 2006. On March 22, 2004, Kaiser withdrew the motion.

The approval of the Pechiney acquisition by the European Commission was obtained on September 29, 2003. The approval is subject to the following conditions:

-21-

CONTENTS

12.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (cont'd)

The divestitures must be completed within a limited period.

In order to obtain the approval of the Pechiney acquisition by the DOJ, the Company entered into a consent decree, on September 29, 2003, with the DOJ pursuant to which the Company has undertaken to divest Pechiney's rolling mill located in Ravenswood, West Virginia, as described in note 4 - - Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale. This divestiture must be completed by July 5, 2004, subject to an additional 30-day extension which could be granted at the discretion of the DOJ.

The Company has guaranteed the repayment of approximately $187 of indebtedness by third parties. Alcan believes that none of these guarantees is likely to be invoked. These guarantees relate primarily to customer contracts, employee housing loans and potential environmental remediation at former Alcan sites.

Alcan, in the course of its operations, is subject to environmental and other claims, lawsuits and contingencies. The Company has environmental contingencies relating to approximately 113 existing and former Alcan sites and third-party sites. Accruals have been made in specific instances where it is probable that liabilities will be incurred and where such liabilities can be reasonably estimated.

Although there is a possibility that liabilities may arise in other instances for which no accruals have been made, the Company does not believe that it is reasonably possible that losses in excess of accrued amounts are sufficient to significantly impair its operations, have a material adverse effect on its financial position or liquidity, or materially and adversely affect its results of operations for any particular reporting period, absent unusual circumstances, will occur.

13.  COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (cont'd)

On December 15, 2003, the Company acquired the Pechiney securities tendered during the initial offer and, as consideration, issued 42,413,105 common shares (including 1,417,910 shares to Pechiney) valued at $39.63 per share and paid $3,544 in cash. Accordingly, Pechiney became a subsidiary of the Company on December 15, 2003.

On January 15, 2004, the Company acquired the Pechiney securities tendered in the re-opened offer and, as consideration, issued 2,082,075 common shares of the Company (including 691,669 shares to Pechiney) valued at $39.63 per share and paid $158 in cash including $5 as payment of additional consideration for holders of Pechiney securities who tendered during the re-opened offer. The additional ownership acquired through this re-opened offer was accounted for in the first quarter of 2004 when the Company settled the purchase price and obtained legal title of the Pechiney securities tendered during the re-opened offer.

The withdrawal offer of Alcan, made in accordance with French securities regulations, as a required step to acquire all remaining Pechiney equity securities, was opened from January 23 to February 5, 2004. It was followed on February 6, 2004, by a compulsory acquisition by which Alcan became the owner of the remaining Pechiney equity securities it did not already own. On January 23, 2004, Alcan paid $109, which was accounted for in the first quarter of 2004, representing the aggregate consideration for the withdrawal offer and compulsory acquisition (without taking into account the Pechiney shares that resulted from exercise of Pechiney options between January 23 and February 5, 2004), for distribution in accordance with the provisions of French securities regulations. On February 6, 2004, the Company paid $7, which was accounted for in the first quarter of 2004, in order to complete the acquisition of the Pechiney shares that were issued between January 23 and February 5, 2004, upon the exercise of Pechiney options. On February 6, 2004, Pechiney became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method. The balance sheet of Pechiney is included in the consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2003, and the results of operations of Pechiney are included in the consolidated financial statements beginning January 1, 2004. Given the magnitude of the acquisition of Pechiney and due to the fact that the transaction was completed at the end of 2003, a tentative purchase price allocation has been performed and, as permitted by accounting standards, the final valuation will be completed in 2004. The Company is in the process of completing its valuations of certain assets and liabilities. Accordingly, the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed could differ materially from the amounts presented in the consolidated financial statements. The significant elements for which the fair values could be modified include property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, goodwill, deferred income taxes, deferred charges and other assets, and deferred credits and other liabilities. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company revised the fair value of net assets acquired in its on-going process of completing the valuations of certain assets and liabilities. The revisions resulted in an increase in the fair value of net assets acquired of $289, including an increase in goodwill of $180.

-23-

CONTENTS

14.  SALES AND ACQUISITIONS OF BUSINESSES (cont'd)

The divestitures required for regulatory reasons as a result of the Pechiney acquisition are described in note 12 - - Commitments and Contingencies.

Fair value of net assets acquired

The $2,463 of goodwill has not yet been allocated to operating segments. The goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

-24-

CONTENTS

14.  SALES AND ACQUISITIONS OF BUSINESSES (cont'd)

On March 10, 2004, the Company announced that it had secured the necessary regulatory and government approvals to move forward with its previously announced definitive joint venture agreement with the Qingtongxia Aluminum Company and the Ningxia Electric Power Development and Investment Co. Ltd. Under the agreement, Alcan will invest approximately $150 for a 50% participation and for a secure power supply in an existing 150-kilotonne modern pre-bake smelter located in the Ningxia autonomous region, in the Peoples' Republic of China. The agreement provides for the joint venture to obtain long-term access to dedicated power on competitive terms sufficient to meet the energy requirements of the smelter. The joint venture also gives Alcan a substantial operating role and the option to acquire, through additional investment, up to 80% of a new 250-kt potline, already under construction.

Alcan, its subsidiaries and joint ventures have established pension plans in the principal countries where they operate, generally open to all employees. Most plans provide pension benefits that are based on the employee's service and highest average eligible compensation before retirement. Pension benefits are periodically adjusted for cost of living increases, either by Company practice, collective agreement or statutory requirement. Plan assets consist primarily of publicly-traded stocks and high-rated debt securities.

Employer Contributions

Significant differences between United States and Canadian GAAP are described below.

Beginning in 2001, the Company was required to adopt, for its primary U.S. GAAP financial statements, SFAS Nos. 133 and 138, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. These standards require that all derivatives be recorded in the financial statements at fair value. Beginning in 2001, unrealized gains and losses resulting from the valuation at fair value of derivatives not meeting strict hedge accounting criteria are recognized in net income as the gains and losses arise and not concurrently with the recognition of the transactions being hedged. Upon initial adoption of the SFAS Nos. 133 and 138 in 2001, the cumulative effect of the accounting change resulted in a decrease in net income of $12.

Beginning January 1, 2004, with the adoption of CICA guideline AcG-13, Hedging Relationships, unrealized gains and losses resulting from the valuation at fair value of derivatives not meeting strict hedge accounting criteria are recognized in net income as the gains and losses arise and not concurrently with the recognition of the transactions being hedged. Upon initial adoption of CICA accounting guideline 13, the effect of the accounting change resulted in an increase in Deferred charges and other assets of $5 and an increase in Deferred credits and other liabilities of $5. Under Canadian GAAP, the recognition of embedded derivatives is not permitted.

The difference between Deferred translation adjustments under U.S. GAAP and Canadian GAAP arises from the different treatment of exchange on long-term debt at January 1, 1983, resulting from the adoption of Canadian accounting standards on foreign currency translation on such date.

Under U.S. GAAP, certain portfolio investments, which are considered to be "available-for-sale" securities, are measured at market value, with the unrealized gains or losses included in Comprehensive income. Under Canadian GAAP, the concept of comprehensive income does not exist and these investments are measured at cost.

Under U.S. GAAP, if the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the market value of plan assets, a minimum pension liability for the excess is recognized to the extent that the liability recorded in the balance sheet is less than the minimum liability. Any portion of this additional liability that relates to unrecognized past service cost is recognized as an intangible asset while the remainder is charged to Comprehensive income. Canadian GAAP has no such requirement to record a minimum liability.

16.  DIFFERENCES BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND CANADIAN GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (cont'd)

Under U.S. GAAP, deferred translation adjustments are reported as a component of Comprehensive income. Under Canadian GAAP, the concept of comprehensive income does not exist and deferred translation adjustments are reported as a component of shareholders' equity.

Under U.S. GAAP, acquired in-process research and development costs are expensed immediately upon acquisition. Under Canadian GAAP, these costs are recognized as intangible assets upon acquisition if they result from contractual or other legal rights, or the research and development is capable of being separated or divided from the acquired company and sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged. Under Canadian GAAP, these intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives.

U.S. GAAP requires the disclosure of Comprehensive income which, for the Company, comprises Net income, the movement in Deferred translation adjustments, movements in unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedges, unrealized gains or losses for the period less gains or losses realized during the period on "available-for-sale" securities and the movement in the minimum pension liability. The concept of Comprehensive income does not exist under Canadian GAAP.

On January 1, 2004, the Company retroactively adopted the new standard of the CICA, Section 3110, Asset Retirement Obligations. The impact of adopting this standard decreased retained earnings at January 1, 2003 by $39 and increased net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 by $39.

On January 1, 2004, the Company adopted the CICA guideline AcG-13, Hedging Relationships, which establishes certain conditions regarding when hedge accounting may be applied. Each hedging relationship is subject to an effectiveness test on a regular basis for reasonable assurance that it is and will continue to be effective. The fair value of derivatives is recorded on the balance sheet and any derivative instrument that does not qualify for hedge accounting is reported on a mark-to-market basis in earnings.

On January 1, 2004, the Company retroactively adopted the provisions of the amendment to Section 3870, Stock-Based Compensation and other Stock-Based Payments. The amendment requires the recognition of an expense computed using the fair value method of accounting for all stock options and payments at grant date. The adoption of this amendment has the same impact as the adoption of the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation under U.S. GAAP. See note 3, Accounting Changes - - Stock Options and Other Stock - Based Compensation.

16.  DIFFERENCES BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND CANADIAN GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (cont'd)

On January 1, 2004, the Company adopted the new standard of the CICA, Section 1100, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This standard establishes accounting standards for financial reporting in accordance with Canadian GAAP. It defines primary sources of Canadian GAAP and requires that the Company apply every relevant primary source.

On January 1, 2004, the Company adopted the CICA Section 1400, General Standards of Financial Statement Presentation. This standard clarifies what constitutes fair presentation in accordance with Canadian GAAP, which involves providing sufficient information in a clear and understandable manner about certain transactions or events of such size, nature and incidence that their disclosure is necessary to understand the Company's financial statements.

-28-

CONTENTS

16.  DIFFERENCES BETWEEN UNITED STATES AND CANADIAN GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (GAAP) (cont'd)

Reconciliation of U.S. and Canadian GAAP (cont'd)