Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
[X] Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
OR
[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from _____________
to _____________
Commission file number: 1-14128
EMERGING VISION, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
New York 11-3096941
---------------------------- -----------------------------------
(State of Incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification No.)
100 Quentin Roosevelt Boulevard
Garden City, New York 11530
----------------------------------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)
(516) 390-2100
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X No
----- -----
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
As of August 12, 2002, there were 29,490,620 shares of the Registrant's
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
Item 1. Financial Statements
EMERGING VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
June 30, December 31,
2002 2001
-------------- -------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 743 $ 1,053
Franchise receivables, net of allowance of $2,164 and $3,095, respectively 1,295 1,837
Other receivables, net of allowance of $52 and $171, respectively 370 739
Current portion of franchise notes receivable 2,338 2,993
Inventories, net 592 783
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 223 94
--------- ----------
Total current assets 5,561 7,499
--------- ----------
Property and equipment, net 911 1,075
Franchise notes and other receivables, net of allowance of $3,223 and $3,326, respectively 1,247 862
Goodwill, net 1,266 1,266
Other assets 302 355
--------- ----------
Total assets $ 9,287 $ 11,057
========= ==========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt, net $ 587 $ 186
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 6,527 7,122
Accrual for store closings (Note 6) 472 964
Related party borrowings 150 750
Net liabilities of discontinued operations 220 235
--------- ----------
Total current liabilities 7,956 9,257
--------- ----------
Long-term debt, net (Note 10) 552 363
--------- ----------
Related party borrowings 100 -
--------- ----------
Franchise deposits and other liabilities 902 820
--------- ----------
Contingencies (Note 7)
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized:
Senior Convertible Preferred Stock, $100,000 liquidation preference per
share; 1 and 3 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 74 287
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 29,422,957 and
27,187,309 shares issued, respectively, and 29,240,620 and 27,004,972 shares outstanding,
respectively 294 272
Treasury stock, at cost, 182,337 shares (204) (204)
Additional paid-in capital 120,345 119,926
Accumulated deficit (120,732) (119,664)
---------- ----------
Total shareholders' equity (deficit) (223) 617
---------- ----------
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity (deficit) $ 287 $ 11,057
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance
sheets.
2
EMERGING VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
For the Three Months For the Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
------------------------ -----------------------
2002 2001 2002 2001
------------------------ -----------------------
Revenues:
Net sales $ 2,084 $ 2,900 $ 5,074 $ 5,740
Franchise royalties 1,690 2,098 3,387 4,330
Net gains from the conveyance of Company-owned
store assets to franchisees, and other fees 7 34 7 122
Interest on franchise notes receivable 89 256 174 555
Other income 66 19 96 58
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total revenues 3,936 5,307 8,738 10,805
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 626 652 1,402 1,206
Selling, general and administrative expenses 3,648 4,559 8,168 9,405
Loss from franchised stores operated under
management agreements - 134 - 247
Interest expense 59 19 98 45
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Total costs and expenses 4,333 5,364 9,668 10,903
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss from continuing operations before provision for
income taxes (397) (57) (930) (98)
Provision for income taxes - - - -
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Loss from continuing operations (397) (57) (930) (98)
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Discontinued operations (Note 3):
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (120) 1,064 (120) 1,495
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ (517) $ 1,007 $ (1,050) $ 1,397
========= ========= ========= =========
Per share information - basic and diluted (Note 5):
Loss from continuing operations $ (0.02) $ 0.00 $ (0.04) $ 0.00
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.06
--------- --------- --------- ---------
Net income (loss) $ (0.02) $ 0.04 $ (0.04) $ 0.06
========= ========= ========= =========
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding -
basic and diluted 28,396 25,556 27,700 25,469
========= ========= ========= =========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
3
EMERGING VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In Thousands)
For the Six Months
Ended June 30,
---------------------------
2002 2001
---------------------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss from continuing operations $ (930) $ (98)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations
to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 246 669
Provision for doubtful accounts 106 7
Non-cash charges related to options and warrants 41 165
Charges related to long-lived assets 36 21
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Franchise and other receivables 195 (558)
Inventories 154 (90)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (129) 101
Other assets 53 75
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (595) 86
Franchise deposits and other liabilities 82 (265)
Accrual for store closings (492) -
--------- ---------
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (1,233) 113
--------- ---------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Franchise notes receivable issued (31) (231)
Proceeds from franchise and other notes receivable 948 1,018
Purchases of property and equipment (118) (229)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by investing activities 799 558
--------- ---------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from the exercise of stock warrants 20 -
Proceeds from borrowings 1,300 -
Payments on borrowings (1,061) (118)
Acquisition of treasury shares - (1)
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 259 (119)
--------- ---------
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations (175) 552
--------- ---------
Net cash used in discontinued operations (135) (3,840)
--------- ---------
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (310) (3,288)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period 1,053 5,215
--------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period $ 743 $ 1,927
========= =========
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ 61 $ 45
========= =========
Taxes $ 47 $ 50
========= =========
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Franchise store assets reacquired $ - $ 349
Issuance of common shares for consulting services - 165
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
4
EMERGING VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
Treasury
Senior Convertible Stock, Additional Total
Preferred Stock Common Stock at cost Paid-In Accumulated Shareholders'
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Deficit Equity
------ ------ ---------- -------- ------ ------ ---------- ----------- ------------
BALANCE - DECEMBER 31, 2001 3 $ 287 27,187,309 $ 272 182,337 $(204) $119,926 $(119,664) $ 617
------ ------ ---------- -------- ------- ----- -------- --------- --------
Issuance of warrants in
connection with financing
arrangements (Note 10) - - - - - - 190 - 190
Issuance of common shares upon
conversion of Senior Convertible
Preferred Stock (Note 9) (2) (213) 235,648 2 - - 229 (18) -
Exercise of stock warrants (Note 9) - - 2,000,000 20 - - - - 20
Net loss - - - - - - - (1,050) (1,050)
------ ------ ---------- -------- ------- ----- -------- --------- --------
BALANCE - JUNE 30, 2002 1 $ 74 29,422,957 $ 294 182,337 $(204) $120,345 $(120,732) $ (223)
====== ====== ========== ======== ======= ===== ======== ========= ========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this consolidated statement.
5
EMERGING VISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of Emerging Vision, Inc.
and subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted for interim financial statement
presentation and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted for complete
financial statement presentation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
for a fair statement of the results of operations and financial position for the
interim periods presented, have been included. All such adjustments are of a
normal recurring nature. This financial information should be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year
ended December 31, 2001. There have been no changes in significant accounting
policies since December 31, 2001.
NOTE 2 - MANAGEMENT'S LIQUIDITY PLANS
As of June 30, 2002, the Company had negative working capital of $2,395,000
and cash on hand of $743,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, the
Company used approximately $1,233,000 of cash in its operating activities. This
usage was in line with management's plans and was mainly a result of $492,000 of
costs related to the Company's store closure plan (Note 6), $595,000 of costs
related to the Company's settlement of certain accounts payable and accrued
liabilities that existed as of December 31, 2001, and $129,000 related to the
prepayment of certain other business expenses offset, in part, by a $195,000
decrease in franchise and other receivables. Management anticipates that it will
continue to incur significant costs in order to continue to close certain of its
non-profitable Company-owned stores, all in its effort to eliminate future cash
flow losses currently generated by such stores.
The Company plans to continue to attempt to improve its cash flows during
2002 by improving store profitability through increased monitoring of
store-by-store operations, closing non-profitable Company-owned stores,
implementing reductions of administrative overhead expenses where necessary and
feasible, actively supporting development programs for franchisees, and seeking
additional financing, if available. Management believes that with the successful
implementation of the aforementioned plans to attempt to improve cash flows, its
existing cash, the collection of outstanding receivables, and the availability
under its existing credit facility (Note 10), there will be sufficient liquidity
available for the Company to continue in operation until at least the end of the
third quarter of 2003. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to achieve the aforementioned plans, or that additional financing will
be available.
In this regard, on April 29, 2002, the Board of Directors (the "Board")
unanimously approved of the Company's initiation of a shareholder rights
offering (Note 9), pursuant to which the Company will attempt to raise
approximately $2,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sale of additional shares of
its Common Stock to its existing shareholders.
NOTE 3 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:
On March 28, 2001, the Board decided that the Company should focus its
efforts and resources on growing its retail optical business and, as a result,
approved a plan to discontinue all other operations then being conducted by the
Company. In connection with this decision, during 2001, the Company completed
its plan of disposal of substantially all of the net assets of Insight Laser
Centers, Inc. ("Insight Laser") - which operated three laser vision correction
centers in the New York metropolitan area, Insight Laser Centers N.Y.I, Inc.
(the "Ambulatory Center") - which owned the assets of an ambulatory surgery
center located in Garden City, New York, and its Internet Division - which was
to provide a web-based portal designed to take advantage of business-to-business
opportunities in the optical industry. As a result, the remaining results of
operations and cash flows of these divisions have been reflected as discontinued
operations in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
As of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, net liabilities of discontinued
operations of $220,000 and $235,000, respectively, were segregated on the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, as of June 30, 2002 and
December 31, 2001, respectively, approximately $120,000 and $141,000 was accrued
as part of accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the accompanying
Consolidated Balance Sheets, representing the remaining estimated costs
associated with the Company's original plan of disposal, and additional accrued
costs associated with the Company's guarantee of certain potential continuing
liabilities of the Ambulatory Center (Note 7).
NOTE 4 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICY - REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company generally charges franchisees a nonrefundable initial franchise
fee. Initial franchise fees are recognized at the time all material services
required to be provided by the Company have been substantially performed.
Continuing franchise royalty fees are based upon a percentage of the gross
revenues generated by each franchised location and are recorded as earned,
subject to meeting all of the requirements of SAB 101 described below.
The Company derives its revenues from the following four principal sources:
Net sales - Represents sales from eye care products and related services;
Franchise royalties - Represents continuing franchise fees based upon a
percentage of the gross revenues generated by each franchised location;
Net gains from the conveyance of Company-store assets to franchisees -
Represents the net gains from the sale of Company-owned store assets to
franchisees; and
Interest on franchise notes - Represents interest charged to franchisees
pursuant to promissory notes issued in connection with a franchisee's
acquisition of the assets of a Sterling Store or a qualified refinancing
of a franchisee's obligations to the Company.
The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" ("SAB 101").
Accordingly, revenues are recorded when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the Company's
price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably
assured. To the extent that collectibility of royalties and/or interest on
franchise notes is not reasonably assured, the Company recognizes such revenue
when the cash is received.
The Company also follows the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force
("EITF") Issue 01-09, "Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a
Customer (Including Reseller of the Vendor's Products)" and, accordingly,
accounts for discounts, coupons and promotions (that are offered to its
customers) as a direct reduction of sales.
NOTE 5 - PER SHARE INFORMATION:
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No.
128, "Earnings Per Share", basic net income (loss) per common share ("Basic
EPS") is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per common share
("Diluted EPS") is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the
weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents
and convertible securities then outstanding. SFAS No. 128 requires the
presentation of both Basic EPS and Diluted EPS on the face of the Company's
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Common stock equivalents were excluded
from the computation for all periods presented, as their impact would have been
anti-dilutive.
7
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted per
share information (in thousands, except per share data):
For the Three Months Ended For the Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2002 2001 2002 2001
-------------------------- ------------------------
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations $ (397) $ (57) $ (930) $ (98)
Conversion of Senior Convertible
Preferred Stock (18) - (18) -
-------- -------- --------- --------
Numerator for basic and diluted per share
information - loss attributable to common
shareholders (415) (57) (948) (98)
-------- -------- --------- --------
Basic and Diluted:
Loss attributable to common shareholders (415) (57) (948) (98)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations (120) 1,064 (120) 1,495
-------- -------- --------- --------
Net income (loss) available (attributable) to
common shareholders $ (535) $ 1,007 $ (1,068) $ 1,397
======== ======== ========= ========
Denominator:
Denominator for basic and diluted per share
information - weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding 28,396 25,556 27,700 25,469
======== ======== ========= ========
Basic and Diluted Per Share Information:
Loss attributable to common shareholders $ (0.02) $ 0.00 $ (0.04) $ 0.00
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.06
-------- -------- --------- --------
Net income (loss) available (attributable) to
common shareholders $ (0.02) $ 0.04 $ (0.04) $ 0.06
======== ======== ========= ========
NOTE 6 - PROVISION FOR STORE CLOSINGS:
The Company follows the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other
Costs to Exit an Activity," and in accordance therewith, provides for losses it
anticipates incurring with respect to those Company-owned stores that it has
identified for future closure, at the time that management makes a formal
commitment to any such plan of closure. The provision is recorded at the time
the determination is made to close a particular store and is based on the
expected net proceeds, if any, to be generated from the disposition of the
store's assets, as compared to the carrying value (after consideration of
impairment, if any) of such store's assets and the estimated costs (including
lease termination costs and other expenses) that are anticipated to be incurred
in the closing of the store in question. As of December 31, 2001, the Company
had accrued approximately $964,000 (comprised of $766,000 in lease termination
costs and $198,000 for other associated expenses) related to its anticipated
closure of 11 stores. During the six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company
successfully closed 6 of such stores and, as of June 30, 2002, $472,000 remained
accrued as accrual for store closings on the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheet. The Company anticipates completing its closure plan by the end of 2002.
8
NOTE 7 - CONTINGENCIES:
Litigation
In 1999, the Company commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the State
of New York against Dr. Larry Joel and Apryl Robinson for amounts claimed due by
the Company on a series of five separate Negotiable Promissory Notes (the
"Notes"). The Notes were issued by corporations owned by the defendants in
connection with their purchase of the assets of, and a Sterling Optical Center
Franchise for, an aggregate of four of the Company's retail optical stores and
an optical laboratory. The repayment of each of the Notes was personally
guaranteed by each of the defendants. In response, the defendants asserted
counterclaims in excess of $13,000,000 based upon the Company's alleged failure
to comply with the terms of an oral, month-to-month consulting agreement between
Dr. Joel and the Company, as well as to purchase the assets of various companies
owned by Dr. Joel, including Duling Optical and D & K Optical - notwithstanding
the fact that the parties failed to agree upon the terms of any such purchase,
the parties failed to enter into any written agreement memorializing such a
transaction, and the Company subsequently purchased such assets from Norwest
Bank (which held a first lien on substantially all of the assets as collateral
for various loans made to each of the entities, all of which were then in
default) in a private foreclosure sale. In March 2001, the Appellate Division
granted the Company's Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of the
defendants' liability, as guarantors of each of such Notes; and, in August 2001,
the Court granted the Company's claim for damages in the approximate amount of
$800,000, which the Company is seeking to enforce. In November 2001, the
defendants each filed for protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and, in
February 2002, received a discharge in such proceedings, which the Company is
presently attempting to overturn. In addition, in March 2001, the Company filed
an additional Motion for Summary Judgment seeking dismissal of all of the
defendants' counterclaims; and the defendant, Dr. Joel, thereafter filed a
cross-motion seeking a determination that the Company breached the
aforementioned oral, month-to-month consulting agreement and that he is,
accordingly, entitled to damages of approximately $13,000,000, each of which
motions were decided entirely in favor of the Company. Subsequently, on July 2,
2001, the defendants, without counsel, filed an appeal of this decision by the
Court, which appeal has not yet been decided. Furthermore, in 1999, Apryl
Robinson commenced an action in Kentucky against Larry Joel and the Company
seeking an unspecified amount of damages and alleging a myriad of claims,
including fraud and misrepresentation. The Company is defending such action and
intends to file a motion to dismiss the same based on the decisions in the New
York action.
In 1999, Berenter Greenhouse and Webster, the advertising agency previously
utilized by the Company, commenced an action, against the Company, in the New
York State Supreme Court, New York County, for amounts alleged to be due for
advertising and related fees. The amounts claimed by the plaintiff are in excess
of $200,000. In response to this action, the Company filed counterclaims of
approximately $500,000, based upon estimated overpayments allegedly made by the
Company pursuant to the agreement previously entered into between the parties.
As of the date hereof, this action was still in the discovery stage.
In February 2000, Essilor Laboratories of America, L.P. commenced an action
against the Company in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas seeking
damages of approximately $250,000, representing the alleged unpaid cost of
certain ophthalmic lenses previously purchased by the Company. In April 2002,
the Company settled this action for approximately $50,000.
In April 2000, the Company commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the
State of New Jersey against Preit-Rubin, Inc. and Cumberland Mall Associates,
the landlord of the former Sterling Optical Store located in Cumberland Mall,
Vineland, New Jersey, seeking damages of approximately $200,000 as a result of
the defendants alleged wrongful eviction of the Company from this location. In
response thereto, the defendants asserted counterclaims of approximately
$100,000 plus legal fees based upon the Company's alleged breach of the lease
pursuant to which it occupied such store. Thereafter, the defendant filed a
motion for summary judgment seeking a dismissal of the Company's claims, which
motion has not yet been decided by the Court. Although the Company believes that
it has a meritorious defense to the defendant's counterclaims, there can be no
assurance that it will be successful in the defense thereof.
9
In February 2001, five of the Company's Site for Sore Eyes franchisees
(owning an aggregate of seven franchised Site for Sore Eyes stores) commenced an
action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California seeking $35,000,000 of damages as a result of the Company's alleged
breach of the respective Franchise Agreements whereby each franchisee/plaintiff
operates its Site for Sore Eyes Optical store(s), fraud and violations of
California law, as well as a declaratory judgment that each of the Franchise
Agreements had been modified to afford each plaintiff certain rights which are
in addition to those set forth in the applicable Franchise Agreements. On April
1, 2002, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement, whereby the plaintiffs
dismissed the action, with prejudice, in exchange for the Company agreeing to
certain amendments to the Franchise Agreement pertaining to each of the
aforementioned seven Site for Sore Eyes Optical Centers, and the Company and
Site-Ncal Area Rep, LLC, a California limited liability company owned by the
plaintiffs ("NCAL"), entering into an Area Representation Agreement whereby NCAL
is authorized to solicit individuals that are interested in acquiring a
franchise for one or more new Site for Sore Eyes retail optical stores to be
opened in the San Francisco Bay area of California. Additionally, NCAL agreed to
provide certain services to each such new franchisee, all in consideration for
the Company's payment, to NCAL, of a portion of the initial franchise fees and
continuing royalty fees to become payable to the Company under each new
Franchise Agreement, as well as the Company's reimbursement of the estimated
administrative costs and expenses to be incurred by NCAL in connection
therewith.
In July 2001, the Company commenced an Arbitration Proceeding in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice, against Eye-Site, Inc. and Eye Site
(Ontario), Ltd., as the makers of two promissory notes (in the aggregate
original principal amount of $600,000) made by one or more of the makers in
favor of the Company, as well as against Mohammed Ali, as the guarantor of the
obligations of each maker under each note. The notes were issued by the makers
in connection with their acquisition of a Master Franchise Agreement for the
Province of Ontario, Canada, as well as their purchase of the assets of, and a
Sterling Optical Center Franchise for, four of the Company's retail optical
stores then located in Ontario, Canada. In response, the defendants
counterclaimed for damages, in the amount of $1,500,000, based upon, among other
items, alleged misrepresentations made by representatives of the Company in
connection with these transactions. The Company believes that it has a
meritorious defense to each counterclaim. As of the date hereof, these
proceedings were in the discovery stage.
In February 2002, Kaye Scholer, LLP, the law firm previously retained by
the Company as its outside counsel, commenced an action in the New York State
Supreme Court seeking unpaid legal fees in the amount of $122,500. As of the
date hereof, the Company has answered the Complaint in such action. The Company
believes that it has a meritorious defense to such claim.
In May 2002, a class action was commenced in the California Superior Court,
Los Angeles County, against the Company and VisionCare of California ("VCC"), a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, by Consumer Cause, Inc. seeking: (i) a
preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from their
continued alleged violation of the California Business and Professions Code (the
"California Code"); and (ii) restitution based upon the defendants' alleged
illegal charging of dilation fees during the four year period immediately
preceding the date of the plaintiff's commencement of such action. In its
complaint, the plaintiff alleges that VCC's employment of licensed optometrists,
as well as its operation (under the name Sterling VisionCare) of optometric
offices in locations which are usually situated adjacent to the Company's retail
optical stores located in the State of California, violates certain provisions
of the California Code and seeks to permanently enjoin VCC from continuing to
operate in such manner. EVI and VCC intend to vigorously defend this action and
believe that they have meritorious defenses to the plaintiff's allegations,
which defenses will include a claim that VCC is a Specialized Health Care
Maintenance Organization which has been specifically licensed, under the
California Knox Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, to provide the
identical services which the plaintiff seeks to enjoin. However, there can be no
assurance that EVI and VCC will be successful in such defense of this action. As
of the date hereof, the action has been transferred to the Court located in
Orange County, California and is in its preliminary stages.
On August 2, 2002, Sterling Advertising, Inc. ("SAI"), a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company, commenced an action in the New York State Supreme
Court, Nassau County, against Harvey Herman Associates, Inc. ("HHA"), an
advertising agency previously retained by SAI, seeking damages, in the estimated
amount of $150,000, as a result of HHA's alleged failure to provide certain of
the services otherwise required of it pursuant to the terms of a certain
Client-Agency Agreement, dated July 9, 2001, between SAI and HHA. Thereafter,
HHA, on August 6, 2002, commenced an action in the New York State Supreme Court,
New York County, against EVI, Sterling Optical and Site For Sore Eyes, seeking
damages in the approximate amount of $90,000, based upon one or more additional
10
agreements allegedly entered into between HHA, Site For Sore Eyes and/or
Sterling Optical, which, in the opinion of SAI, required HHA to perform certain
services which were already included within the scope of the services required
to be performed, by HHA, under such Client-Agency Agreement. As of the date
hereof, SAI intends to file a motion, with the Nassau County Court, seeking a
transfer of the New York action to Nassau County and consolidating the same with
SAI's action pending in such Nassau County court.
In addition to the foregoing, the Company is a defendant in certain
lawsuits alleging various claims incurred in the ordinary course of business,
certain of which claims are covered by various insurance policies, subject to
certain deductible amounts and maximum policy limits. In the opinion of
management, the resolution of these claims should not have a material adverse
effect, individually or in the aggregate, upon the Company's business or
financial condition. Other than as set forth above, management believes that
there are no other legal proceedings pending or threatened to which the Company
is, or may be, a party, or to which any of its properties are or may be subject,
which, in the opinion of management, will have a material adverse effect on the
Company.
Guarantees
In connection with the Company's sale of the Ambulatory Center on May 31,
2001 (Note 2), the Company agreed to guarantee certain of the potential ongoing
liabilities of the Ambulatory Center. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had
accrued $104,000 for estimated guaranteed liabilities in 2002. During the six
months ended June 30, 2002, the Company accrued an additional $120,000 for such
estimated guaranteed liabilities in 2002, representing the estimated cash flow
losses of the Ambulatory Center through the date hereof, based on information
provided by the owner. Although the term of the Company's guarantee (of such
liabilities) will not expire until April 2008, its exposure thereunder may, in
the future, be reduced, on a pro-rata basis, based upon the ability of the
current owner to attract additional investors who agree to guarantee all or a
portion thereof. However, there can be no assurance that such liabilities will
be so reduced and, as a result, the Company could in the future continue to
incur further costs associated with such guarantee should the Ambulatory Center
continue to generate cash flow losses.
As of June 30, 2002, the Company was a guarantor of certain leases of
retail optical stores franchised and subleased to its franchisees. In the event
that all of such franchisees defaulted on their respective subleases, the
Company would be obligated for aggregate lease obligations of approximately
$2,682,000.
NOTE 8 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
On December 3, 2001 and December 20, 2001, respectively, the Board
authorized the Company to borrow $150,000 and $300,000 from Horizons Investors
Corp. ("Horizons"), a New York corporation principally owned by a director and
principal shareholder of the Company. The loan was payable on demand, together
with interest calculated at the prime rate plus 1%. The Company repaid these
loans (which aggregated $450,000 as of December 31, 2001), in full, on January
23, 2002 (Note 10).
On December 6, 2001, the Board authorized the Company to borrow $300,000
from Broadway Partners LLC, a partnership owned by certain of the children of
certain of the Company's principal shareholders and directors. The loan was
payable on demand, together with interest calculated at the prime rate plus 1%.
The Company repaid this loan ($300,000 as of December 31, 2001), in full, on
January 23, 2002 (Note 10).
Until January 10, 2002, the Company subleased, from a limited liability
company owned by certain of the Company's principal shareholders and directors,
and shared with Cohen Fashion Optical, Inc. ("CFO"), a retail optical chain
owned by certain of the principal shareholders and directors of the Company, and
other tenants, an office building located in East Meadow, New York. Occupancy
costs were appropriately allocated based upon the applicable square footage
leased by the respective tenants of the building. For the year ended December
31, 2001, the Company paid approximately $440,000 for rent and related charges
for these offices. On January 10, 2002, the Company relocated to an office
building located in Garden City, New York, and entered into a sublease with CFO
for one of the two floors then being subleased to CFO. The Company estimates
that its new annual rent will be approximately $163,000. Occupancy costs are
being allocated between the Company and CFO based upon the respective square
footages being occupied. Management believes that the sublease is at fair market
rental value.
11
In April 2002, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of one of
its stores located in New York City, together with all of the capital stock of
its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sterling Vision of 125th Street, Inc., which is the
tenant under the master lease for such store, to General Vision Services LLC, a
retail optical chain owned by certain of the principal shareholders and
directors of the Company and members of their respective immediate families, for
the sum of $55,000.
On July 23, 2002, the Board authorized the Company to borrow $300,000 from
one of its principal shareholders and directors. The loan was payable on August
10, 2002, together with interest in an amount equal to 1% of the principal
amount of such loan. The Company repaid this loan, in full, on August 8, 2002
(Note 10).
In the ordinary course of business, largely due to the fact that the
entities occupy office space in the same building, and in an effort to obtain
savings with respect to certain administrative costs, the Company and CFO will,
at times, share in the costs of minor expenses. Management believes that these
expenses have been appropriately accounted for by the Company.
In the opinion of management, all of the above transactions were conducted
at "arms-length."
NOTE 9 - SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Issuance of Warrants in Connection with Financing Arrangements
On January 23, 2002, in connection with obtaining its financing
arrangements (Note 10), the Company granted Horizons an aggregate of 2,500,000
warrants (1,750,000 of which were immediately exercisable, with the balance
vesting in quarterly increments of 250,000, beginning April 22, 2002, subject to
any amounts then remaining unpaid under the secured term note and/or credit
facility). The warrants have a five-year term and provide for an exercise price
of $0.01 per share. The fair value of these warrants (valued using the
Black-Scholes model) was approximately $234,000. On May 1, 2002, Horizons
exercised 2,000,000 of such warrants. Additionally, on July 22, 2002, Horizons
exercised an additional 250,000 of such warrants.
Increase in Authorized Number of Shares of Common Stock
On April 29, 2002, the Board unanimously voted to recommend to the
shareholders that the Company's Certificate of Incorporation be amended to
increase the number of authorized shares of its Common Stock from 50,000,000 to
150,000,000 shares, and to increase the total number of authorized shares of its
capital stock from 55,000,000 to 155,000,000. On July 11, 2002, the Company's
shareholders approved of such amendment, which was thereafter filed by the
Company.
Shareholder Rights Offering
On April 29, 2002, the Board unanimously approved of the Company's
initiation of a shareholder rights offering (the "Rights Offering), pursuant to
which, on a date to be established by the Board, the Company will grant each
holder of shares of its Common Stock the right to purchase one additional share
of Common Stock (the "Purchased Share"), at a price per share to be established
by the Board, for each share of Common Stock owned by such shareholder as of a
record date also to be established by the Board. For each right that is
exercised by a shareholder, such shareholder will receive one Purchased Share
together with a warrant to purchase one additional share of Common Stock at a
price to be established by the Board (the "Warrant"). The Company will attempt
to raise approximately $2,000,000 of gross proceeds in the Rights Offering.
Conversion of Senior Convertible Preferred Stock
In April 1998, the Company issued a series of its Preferred Stock, par
value $0.01 per share (the "Senior Convertible Preferred Stock"), together with
warrants (all of which expired in February 2001) to acquire shares of its Common
Stock. Each share of Senior Convertible Preferred Stock had a liquidation
preference of $100,000, and was originally convertible into Common Stock at a
price of $5.00 per share. In December 1999, the conversion price was reduced to
$0.75 per share for all of the remaining holders of Senior Convertible Preferred
12
Stock. As of December 31, 2001, there were 2.51 shares of Senior Convertible
Preferred Stock outstanding with a stated value of $251,000.
On June 8, 2002, one of the remaining two holders of the Company's Senior
Convertible Preferred Stock exercised its right to convert an aggregate of
$177,736 stated value of Senior Convertible Preferred Stock, into an aggregate
of 235,648 shares of the Company's Common Stock.
NOTE 10 - FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
On January 23, 2002, the Company secured two separate financing
arrangements as follows:
Secured Term Note
-----------------
The Company entered into a secured term note for $1,000,000 with an
independent financial institution. This note is repayable in 24 equal monthly
installments of $41,666, and bears interest as defined (4.95% at the inception
of the note, and subsequently amended on April 1, 2002 to 3.95%). The note is
fully collateralized by a $1,000,000 certificate of deposit posted by Horizons,
a related party (Note 8), at the same financial institution.
Credit Facility
---------------
The Company entered into an agreement with Horizons to borrow up to a
maximum of $1,000,000. This credit facility bears interest at the prime rate
plus 1% (5.5% as of the date of the loan agreement), provided for an initial
advance of $300,000, requires minimum incremental advances of $150,000, matures
on January 22, 2004, requires ratable monthly principal and interest payments of
each borrowing, is amortizable through the maturity date of the facility, is
fully collateralized by a pledge of certain of the Company's qualifying
franchise notes, and requires the payment of a facility fee of 2% per annum,
payable monthly, on the unused portion of the credit facility.
Simultaneous with obtaining the above financing, the Company repaid its
outstanding related party borrowings totaling $750,000, plus interest (Note 8).
In consideration for providing access to the credit facility and guaranteeing
the term note, the Company granted Horizons an aggregate of 2,500,000 warrants,
the fair value of which was $234,000 (Note 9). The net proceeds received were
allocated based on the relative fair values of the debt and the warrants.
Accordingly, $810,00 0 was allocated to the debt, and $190,000 was allocated to
the warrants as a discount to the debt to be amortized as interest expense over
the term of the note (2 years). For the six months ended June 30, 2002,
approximately $41,000 of such discount was amortized and recognized as interest
expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations.
On August 8, 2002, the Company obtained an additional advance under the
credit facility of $300,000, the proceeds of which were used to repay an
outstanding related party borrowing (Note 8). As of the date hereof, $450,000
remained available to the Company under the credit facility.
13
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
-----------------------------------------------------------
and Results of Operations
-------------------------
This Report contains certain forward-looking statements and information
relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of the Company's
management, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available
to, the Company's management. When used in this Report, the words "anticipate",
"believe", "estimate", "expect", and similar expressions, as they relate to the
Company or the Company's management, are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Such statements reflect the current view of the Company with respect
to future events, are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties. These risks and uncertainties may include:
product demand and market acceptance risks; the effect of economic conditions;
the impact of competitive products, services and pricing; product development,
commercialization and technological difficulties; and the outcome of pending and
future litigation. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results
may vary materially from those described herein as "anticipated", "believed",
"estimated", or "expected". The Company does not intend to update these
forward-looking statements.
Results of Operations
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2002, as Compared to the Comparable
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Periods in 2001
- ---------------
Net sales for Company-owned stores, including revenues generated by the
Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, VisionCare of California, a specialized
health care maintenance organization licensed by the State of California
Department of Managed Health Care, decreased by approximately $816,000, or
28.1%, to $2,084,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to
$2,900,000 for the comparable period in 2001, and decreased by approximately
$666,000, or 11.6%, to $5,074 ,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002, as
compared to $5,740,000 for the comparable period in 2001. These decreases were
primarily due to the lower average number of Company-owned stores in operation
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to the same
periods in 2001. These decreases were in line with management's expectations due
to the plan to close the Company's non-profitable Company-owned stores.
As of June 30, 2002, there were 187 stores in operation, consisting of 32
Company-owned stores (including 10 Company-owned stores being managed by
franchisees) and 155 franchised stores, as compared to 218 stores in operation
as of June 30, 2001, consisting of 28 Company-owned stores (including 12
Company-owned stores being managed by franchisees) and 180 franchised stores
(including 2 stores being managed by the Company on behalf of franchisees). On a
same store basis (for stores that operated as a Company-owned store during both
of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001), comparative
net sales decreased by $344,000, or 22.7%, to $1,171,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2002, as compared to $1,515,000 for the comparable period in
2001, and decreased by $460,000 or 14.5%, to $2,716,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2002, as compared to $3,176,000 for the comparable period in 2001.
Management believes that this decline was a direct result of the general
downturn in the economy that has occurred during 2002.
Franchise royalties decreased by $408,000, or 19.4%, to $1,690,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to $2,098,000 for the comparable
period in 2001, and decreased by $943,000, or 21.8%, to $3,387,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to $4,330,000 for the comparable period
in 2001. These decreases were primarily a result of a lower average number of
franchised stores in operation during the three and six month periods ended June
30, 2002 as compared to 2001, as described above.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, there was $7,000 of net
gains from the conveyance of Company-owned store assets to franchisees
(including initial franchise fees). For the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2001, the Company recognized $34,000 and $122,000, respectively, of
such gains and fees. These decreases were due to the fact that the Company did
not convey to franchisees (and thus did not realize a gain on) any assets of
Company-owned stores during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002.
14
Interest on franchise notes receivable decreased by $167,000, or 65.2%, to
$89,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to $256,000 for
the comparable period in 2001, and decreased by $381,000, or 68.6%, to $174,000
for the six months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to $555,000 for the
comparable period in 2001. These decreases were primarily due to numerous
franchise notes maturing, principal payments on the balance of franchise notes,
and fewer new notes being generated during the three and six month periods ended
June 30, 2002 as compared to the comparable periods in 2001.
Other income increased to $66,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002,
as compared to $19,000 for the comparable period in 2001, and increased to
$96,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to $58,000 for the
comparable period in 2001. These increases were primarily due to an increase in
certain franchise related fees (related to renewals and/or transfers of
franchise agreements) during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002.
The Company's gross profit margin decreased by 8.7%, to 68.8% for the three
months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to 77.5% for the comparable period in
2001, and decreased by 7.1%, to 71.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2002, as
compared to 79.0% for the comparable period in 2001. In an effort to remain
competitive with other retail optical chains during the economic downturn in
2002, the Company substantially reduced the selling prices on many of its
products, thus causing profit margins to decrease. Further, during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company, largely due to a decrease, from the
comparable periods in 2001, of its financial resources, was unable to obtain the
same discounts from certain of its vendors than in the comparable periods in
2001, and, additionally, was unable to take advantage of certain product
purchase discounts tied to prompt payment. In the future, the Company's gross
profit margin may fluctuate depending upon the extent and timing of changes in
the product mix in Company-owned stores, competitive pricing, promotional
incentives, and the ability of the Company to take advantage of purchase
discounts.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $911,000, or
20.0%, to $3,648,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to
$4,559,000 for the comparable period in 2001, and decreased by $1,237,000, or
13.2%, to $8,168,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to
$9,405,000 for the comparable period in 2001. These decreases were a direct
result of the closure of non-profitable Company-owned stores during 2002,
management's implementation of reductions of administrative overhead expenses,
and closer monitoring of store-by-store and corporate operations.
The Company has certain outstanding contingent warrants that become
exercisable upon the achievement, by the Company, of certain predetermined
EBITDA targets. Due to these contingencies, the future valuation of these
contingent warrants, if and when they become exercisable, will result in charges
to the Company's results of operations in future periods. The significance of
these charges, if any, will be dependent upon the fair market value of the
Company's Common Stock at the time that the respective EBITDA targets are
achieved.
Loss from franchised stores operated under management agreements was
$134,000 and $247,000, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30,
2001. There was no such loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002,
as there are no longer any franchised stores being managed by the Company on
behalf of franchisees.
Interest expense increased $40,000, to $59,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2002, as compared to $19,000 for the comparable period in 2001, and
increased by $53,000, to $98,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002, as
compared to $45,000 for the comparable period in 2001. These increases were
primarily due to the interest being paid in connection with the related party
debt financing obtained in January 2002 (Note 10), and the amortization of the
discount associated with such financing.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2002, the Company had negative working capital of
$2,395,000, and cash on hand of $743,000. For the six months ended June 30,
2002, the Company used approximately $1,233,000 of cash in its operating
activities. This usage was in line with management's plans and was mainly a
result of $492,000 of costs related to the Company's store closure plan (Note
6), $595,000 of costs related to the Company's settlement of certain accounts
15
payable and accrued liabilities that existed as of December 31, 2001, and
$129,000 related to the prepayment of certain other business expenses offset, in
part, by a $195,000 decrease in franchise and other receivables.
For the six months ended June 30, 2002, cash flows provided by investing
activities were $799,000, as compared to $558,000 for the comparable period in
2001. This increase was principally due to a lower amount of purchases of
property and equipment, and less franchise notes receivable being issued in
favor of the Company.
For the six months ended June 30, 2002, cash flows provided by financing
activities were $259,000, principally due to the $1,300,000 of financing the
Company received in January 2002 (Note 10), offset principally by the repayment
of a portion of such financing and $750,000 of related party borrowings.
On January 23, 2002, the Company secured two separate financing
arrangements, as follows:
Secured Term Note
-----------------
The Company entered into a secured term note for $1,000,000 with an
independent financial institution. This note is repayable in 24 equal monthly
installments of $41,666, and bears interest as defined (4.95% at the inception
of the note, and subsequently amended on April 1, 2002 to 3.95%). The note is
fully collateralized by a $1,000,000 certificate of deposit posted by Horizon, a
related party, at the same financial institution.
Credit Facility
---------------
The Company entered into an agreement with Horizon to borrow up to a
maximum of $1,000,000. This credit facility bears interest at the prime rate
plus 1% (5.5% as of the date of the loan agreement), provided for an initial
advance of $300,000, requires minimum incremental advances of $150,000, matures
on January 22, 2004, requires ratable monthly principal and interest payments of
each borrowing, is amortizable through the maturity date of the facility, is
fully collateralized by a pledge of certain of the Company's qualifying
franchise notes, and requires the payment of a facility fee of 2% per annum,
payable monthly, on the unused portion of the credit facility.
Simultaneous with obtaining the above financing, the Company repaid
outstanding related party borrowings due to Horizon and Broadway totaling
$750,000, plus interest. On August 8, 2002, the Company obtained an additional
advance under the credit facility of $300,000, the proceeds of which were used
to repay an outstanding related party borrowing (Note 8). As of the date hereof,
$450,000 remained available to the Company under the credit facility.
The Company plans to continue to attempt to improve its cash flows during
2002 by improving store profitability through increased monitoring of
store-by-store operations, closing non-profitable Company-owned stores,
implementing reductions of administrative overhead expenses where necessary and
feasible, actively supporting development programs for franchisees, and seeking
additional financing, if available. Management believes that with the successful
implementation of the aforementioned plans to attempt to improve cash flows, its
existing cash, the collection of outstanding receivables, and the availability
under its existing credit facility (Note 10), there will be sufficient liquidity
available for the Company to continue in operation until at least the end of the
third quarter of 2003. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will
be able to achieve the aforementioned plans, or that additional financing will
be available.
In this regard, on April 29, 2002, the Company's Board of Directors
unanimously approved of the Company's initiation of a shareholder rights
offering (Note 9), pursuant to which the Company will attempt to raise
approximately $2,000,000 of gross proceeds from the sale of additional shares of
its Common Stock to its existing shareholders.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
----------------------------------------------------------
The Company presently has outstanding certain equity instruments with
beneficial conversion terms. Accordingly, the Company, in the future, could
incur non-cash charges to equity (as a result of the exercise of such beneficial
conversion terms), which would have a negative impact on future per share
calculations.
16
The Company is exposed to market risks from potential changes in interest
rates as they relate to the Company's investments in highly liquid marketable
securities and borrowings under its credit facility and term loan. The Company
believes that the level of risk related to its investments and any such
borrowings, is not material to the Company's financial condition or results of
operations. The Company does not expect to use interest rate swaps or other
instruments to hedge its borrowings under its credit facility or term loan.
17
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
-----------------
In May 2002, a class action was commenced in the California Superior Court,
Los Angeles County, against the Company and VisionCare of California ("VCC"), a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, by Consumer Cause, Inc. seeking: (i) a
preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining the defendants from their
continued alleged violation of the California Business and Professions Code (the
"California Code"); and (ii) restitution based upon the defendants' alleged
illegal charging of dilation fees during the four year period immediately
preceding the date of the plaintiff's commencement of such action. In its
complaint, the plaintiff alleges that VCC's employment of licensed optometrists,
as well as its operation (under the name Sterling VisionCare) of optometric
offices in locations which are usually situated adjacent to the Company's retail
optical stores located in the State of California, violates certain provisions
of the California Code and seeks to permanently enjoin VCC from continuing to
operate in such manner. EVI and VCC intend to vigorously defend this action and
believe that they have meritorious defenses to the plaintiff's allegations,
which defenses will include a claim that VCC is a Specialized Health Care
Maintenance Organization which has been specifically licensed, under the
California Knox Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, to provide the
identical services which the plaintiff seeks to enjoin. However, there can be no
assurance that EVI and VCC will be successful in such defense of this action. As
of the date hereof, the action has been transferred to the Court located in
Orange County, California and is in its preliminary stages.
On August 2, 2002, Sterling Advertising, Inc. ("SAI"), a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company, commenced an action in the New York State Supreme
Court, Nassau County, against Harvey Herman Associates, Inc. ("HHA"), an
advertising agency previously retained by SAI, seeking damages, in the estimated
amount of $150,000, as a result of HHA's alleged failure to provide certain of
the services otherwise required of it pursuant to the terms of a certain
Client-Agency Agreement, dated July 9, 2001, between SAI and HHA. Thereafter,
HHA, on August 6, 2002, commenced an action in the New York State Supreme Court,
New York County, against EVI, Sterling Optical and Site For Sore Eyes, seeking
damages in the approximate amount of $90,000, based upon one or more additional
agreements allegedly entered into between HHA, Site For Sore Eyes and/or
Sterling Optical, which, in the opinion of SAI, required HHA to perform certain
services which were already included within the scope of the services required
to be performed, by HHA, under such Client-Agency Agreement. As of the date
hereof, SAI intends to file a motion, with the Nassau County Court, seeking a
transfer of the New York action to Nassau County and consolidating the same with
SAI's action pending in such Nassau County court.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
-----------------------------------------
On January 23, 2002, the Company issued warrants to Horizons to purchase an
aggregate of 2,500,000 shares of its Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.01
per share, in consideration for providing the Company access to a $1,000,000
credit facility and for guaranteeing a $1,000,000 term note made by the Company
in favor of an independent financial institution. On May 1, 2002 and July 22,
2002, respectively, Horizons exercised 2,000,000 and 250,000 of such warrants,
and shares of the Company's Common Stock were issued in their place. The
issuance of all of the aforementioned securities was exempt from registration
requirements pursuant to an exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended.
On June 8, 2002, one of the remaining two holders of the Company's Senior
Convertible Preferred Stock exercised its right to convert an aggregate of
$177,736 stated value of Senior Convertible Preferred Stock, into an aggregate
of 235,648 shares of the Company's Common Stock. The issuance of all of these
securities was exempt from registration requirements pursuant to an exemption
under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
-------------------------------
Not applicable.
18
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
---------------------------------------------------
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
-----------------
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
--------------------------------
A. Exhibits
--------
Not applicable.
B. Reports on Form 8-K
-------------------
On June 24, 2002, the Company filed a Report on Form 8-K regarding the
dismissal of Arthur Andersen LLP as its independent public accountants.
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
EMERGING VISION, INC.
(Registrant)
BY: /s/ Christopher G. Payan
-------------------------------
Christopher G. Payan
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Co-Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
Dated: August 19, 2002
20