Back to GetFilings.com
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 Commission file number 0-22411
SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
---------------
DELAWARE 56-1857809
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
212 SOUTH TRYON STREET
SUITE 500
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28281
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(704) 334-9905
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
---------------
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT: NONE
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
UNITS OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
(TITLE OF EACH CLASS)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.
The aggregate market value of limited partnership interest ("Units") held
by nonaffiliates of the Registrant, as of March 11, 1999 was $34,495,682 based
on the last reported sale price of the common stock of Summit Properties, Inc.,
a Maryland corporation and the sole general partner of the Registrant (the
"Company"), into which Units are redeemable under certain circumstances at the
election of the Company.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
- --------- -----
PART I
1. Business ................................................................................. 3
2. Properties ............................................................................... 8
3. Legal Proceedings ........................................................................ 11
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ...................................... 11
PART II
5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters .................... 12
6. Selected Financial Data .................................................................. 13
7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations .... 15
7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk ................................ 31
8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .............................................. 31
9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ..... 31
PART III
10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant ....................................... 32
11. Executive Compensation ................................................................... 34
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management ........................... 42
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions ........................................... 43
PART IV
14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K .......................... 44
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
Summit Properties Partnership L.P. (the "Operating Partnership") is one of
the largest developers and operators of luxury garden apartment communities
(the "Communities") in the southeastern, southwestern and mid-atlantic United
States. The Operating Partnership's current portfolio consists of 66 apartment
Communities with 16,631 apartment homes, including Summit Foxcroft in which the
Operating Partnership has a 75% managing general partner interest. The
Operating Partnership also has five apartment Communities with 1,370 apartment
homes under construction and in lease-up for a total of 18,001 apartment homes.
For the year ended December 31, 1998, the average physical occupancy rate
of the Operating Partnership's fully stabilized Communities was 93.3%, and the
average monthly rental revenue for these Communities was $763 per occupied
apartment home. In addition, the Operating Partnership has acquisition
Communities, stabilized development Communities (i.e. stabilized after January
1, 1996) and Communities in lease-up. A Community is considered to be
stabilized at the attainment of 93.0% physical occupancy. A Community which the
Operating Partnership has developed is deemed fully stabilized when stabilized
for the two prior years as of the beginning of the current year. A Community
which the Operating Partnership has acquired is deemed fully stabilized when
owned by the Operating Partnership for one year or more as of the beginning of
the current year. In 1998, average physical occupancy rates were 93.8% and
93.1% and average monthly rental revenue was $859 and $927 per occupied
apartment home for acquisition Communities and stabilized development
Communities, respectively. Annual averages for Communities in lease-up are not
meaningful as the Communities are in various stages of construction/lease-up
during the year. The Operating Partnership also manages approximately 2,800
apartment homes for unrelated third parties. The Operating Partnership is a
fully integrated organization with multifamily development, construction,
acquisition and management expertise which employs approximately 650
individuals.
The sole general partner of the Operating Partnership is Summit Properties
Inc. ("Summit Properties"), a fully integrated real estate investment trust
("REIT"). Summit Properties' common stock, par value $.01 per share (the
"Common Stock") is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") under the
symbol "SMT". The Operating Partnership's third party management and certain
construction and other businesses are conducted through its subsidiaries,
Summit Management Company, a Maryland corporation (the "Management Company"),
and Summit Apartment Builders, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Construction
Company"). Except where otherwise explicitly noted, the "Operating Partnership"
shall also hereinafter refer to the Operating Partnership, the Management
Company and the Construction Company.
The Operating Partnership has chosen to focus its efforts in the following
high growth core markets: Charlotte, North Carolina; Tampa/Sarasota, Florida;
Washington, D.C.; Raleigh/Central, North Carolina; South Florida; Atlanta,
Georgia; Richmond, Virginia; Orlando, Florida; Indianapolis, Indiana; Dallas,
Texas; Austin, Texas and Columbus, Ohio. In keeping with this strategy, the
Operating Partnership has established city operating offices in Charlotte,
North Carolina; Tampa, Florida; Bethesda, Maryland; Atlanta, Georgia; Fort
Lauderdale, Florida; Dallas, Texas and Raleigh, North Carolina. These city
offices have direct responsibility for selecting and overseeing new
developments and for managing the Communities in their geographic areas. This
decentralized structure enables corporate management to maintain tight controls
and allows the Operating Partnership to compete effectively in its core
markets, while efficiently allocating capital to those markets that will yield
the highest risk-adjusted return.
OPERATING PHILOSOPHY
The Operating Partnership seeks to maximize the economic return from its
Communities by optimizing the trade-off between increasing rental rates and
maintaining high occupancy levels. Consistent with this strategy, the Operating
Partnership is among the rental rate leaders in its markets. Although this
strategy may result in slightly lower occupancy rates, the Operating
Partnership believes that the dynamic tension created by this balancing
strategy maximizes operating income at the property level and improves growth
in the Operating Partnership's cash flow over the long term. Generally, the
Operating Partnership has found that it is not maximizing property operating
income per apartment home when occupancies are above 95%.
Historically, the Operating Partnership has been able to charge market
leading rents to its residents while maintaining high occupancy rates due to:
the upscale features of its Communities, the comprehensive service provided by
its on-site management and its favorable mix of apartment homes. The Operating
Partnership's geographic market focus and decentralized structure further
promote income growth.
3
GROWTH STRATEGIES
The Operating Partnership's objective is to create long term value through
four strategies: maximizing cash flow from existing Communities, targeting
major growth markets, deploying capital strategically and dedication to
customer service.
MAXIMIZING CASH FLOW FROM EXISTING COMMUNITIES. The Operating Partnership
seeks to maximize the economic return from its Communities by optimizing the
trade-off between increasing rental rates and maintaining high occupancy
levels. Consistent with this strategy, the Operating Partnership is among the
rental rate leaders in its markets. The Operating Partnership's affluent
resident profile, well-trained property management staff and management
information systems support this strategy. For the year ended December 31,
1998, average rent per occupied apartment home for the Operating Partnership's
fully stabilized Communities increased 3.3%, and property operating income from
these Communities increased 3.6% for the same period. Average occupancy, rental
revenue and property operating income levels for the Operating Partnership's
fully stabilized Communities are as follows for the years set forth below:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
---------- ---------- ----------
Average Physical Occupancy (1) ........................................ 93.3% 93.2% 93.1%
Average Monthly Rental Revenue per Occupied Apartment Home ............ $ 763 $ 717 $ 714
Average Monthly Rental Revenue per Occupied Apartment Home Growth Rate 3.3% 2.1% 3.8%
Property Operating Income Growth Rate (2) ............................. 3.6% 2.4% 3.1%
Number of Communities (1) ............................................. 39 44 32
- ---------
1) The Operating Partnership also has fourteen acquisition Communities, five
stabilized development Communities (i.e., stabilized after January 1, 1996)
and thirteen Communities in lease-up. In 1998, average physical occupancy
rates were 93.8% and 93.1% and average monthly rental revenue were $859 and
$927 per occupied apartment home for acquisition Communities and stabilized
development Communities, respectively. Annual averages for Communities in
lease-up are not meaningful as the Communities were in various stages of
construction/lease-up during the year.
2) Property Operating Income is defined as total rental and other property
revenues less property operating and maintenance expense (excluding
depreciation and amortization).
TARGETING MAJOR GROWTH MARKETS. The Operating Partnership's existing
portfolio and plans for growth focus on core markets that are expected to grow
at a greater rate than the national average in population, employment and
household formation. The Operating Partnership's current high growth core
markets are as follows: Charlotte, North Carolina; Tampa/ Sarasota, Florida;
Washington, D.C.; Raleigh/Central, North Carolina; South Florida; Atlanta,
Georgia; Richmond, Virginia; Orlando, Florida; Indianapolis, Indiana; Dallas,
Texas; Austin, Texas and Columbus, Ohio. The Operating Partnership's strategy
provides geographic diversification that protects it against an economic
downturn in any one market, while at the same time benefiting from a tightly
targeted focus on a limited number of attractive markets. By focusing only on
these markets, the Operating Partnership gains better brand recognition, builds
local expertise and improves operating efficiencies. Within each market there
are numerous housing alternatives that compete with the Communities in
attracting residents. The Communities compete directly with other rental
apartments, condominiums and single-family homes that are available for rent or
sale in the markets in which the Communities are located. In addition, various
entities, including insurance companies, pension and investment funds,
partnerships, investment companies and other multifamily REITs, compete with
the Operating Partnership for the acquisition of existing properties and the
development of new properties, some of which may have greater resources than
the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership has not identified any
dominant competitor, nor is it currently the dominant competitor, in its
markets.
DEPLOYING CAPITAL STRATEGICALLY. Since its formation in 1994, the
Operating Partnership has increased the size of its property portfolio by
almost 150% to 16,631 apartment homes. Development of new Communities has been
the foundation of the Operating Partnership's growth. Of its 66 completed
Communities, 39 have been developed by the Operating Partnership or its
predecessors. The Operating Partnership attributes much of its historical cash
flow growth to the quality of the apartment Communities it has developed over
the years.
The Operating Partnership maintains an active development program which
provides it with a predictable and consistent stream of new revenues. Focusing
on development allows the Operating Partnership to build desirable properties
that generate premium rents. It also provides returns which generally exceed
those achieved on acquisitions. The Operating Partnership's development goal is
to provide its residents with a community that feels like single-family
housing, with front yards, open floor plans, abundant square footage, generous
storage and both attached and detached garages. The Operating
4
Partnership enters into leases with its residents that include provisions which
are usual and customary for apartment leases, such as the payment of rent
monthly, advance notice in the event of a termination, provision of a security
deposit and the imposition by the Operating Partnership of a charge for rent
paid after the fifth day of the month. The leases are predominantly for a term
of one year.
The Operating Partnership employs a combination of local autonomy and
centralized oversight in its development process. Development officers live in
their respective markets, so that critical decision-making is kept local.
Development officers report to a corporate development executive, a process
that is designed to ensure consistency in design, building materials and
quality.
The Operating Partnership utilizes the Construction Company in addition to
third-party general contractors to build its new Communities. Of the 2,133
apartment homes in development at December 31, 1998, 63% are being built by the
Construction Company, which has resulted in higher quality construction,
improved timeliness and cost savings.
In 1998, the Operating Partnership completed development of four
Communities, adding 973 apartment homes to the Operating Partnership's
portfolio. These four Communities represent a total investment of approximately
$74.4 million. The Communities completed in 1998 are Summit Stonefield, Summit
Lake I, Summit Ballantyne II and Summit New Albany.
As of December 31, 1998, the Operating Partnership had nine apartment
Communities under construction (five of which are also in lease-up) containing
2,133 apartment homes, with a budgeted cost of $192.5 million. The following
provides summary information regarding the nine Communities under construction
as of December 31, 1998 (dollars in thousands):
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANTICIPATED
APARTMENT ESTIMATED COST TO COST TO CONSTRUCTION
COMMUNITY HOMES COSTS DATE COMPLETE COMPLETION
- -------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------
Summit Fair Lakes I -- Fairfax, VA ............... 370 $ 32,900 $ 30,351 $ 2,549 Q1 1999
Summit Governor's Village -- Chapel Hill, NC ..... 242 16,700 16,518 182 Q1 1999
Summit Doral -- Miami, Florida ................... 260 22,800 16,601 6,199 Q2 1999
Summit Westwood -- Raleigh, NC ................... 354 24,400 18,601 5,799 Q3 1999
Summit Lake II -- Raleigh, NC .................... 144 10,200 7,012 3,188 Q2 1999
Summit Sedgebrook II -- Charlotte, NC ............ 120 7,800 4,409 3,391 Q3 1999
Summit Fair Lakes II -- Fairfax, VA .............. 160 14,200 8,017 6,183 Q3 1999
Summit Largo -- Largo, MD ........................ 217 18,000 4,984 13,016 Q1 2000
Summit Grandview -- Charlotte, NC ................ 266 45,500 3,703 41,797 Q2 2000
Other development and construction costs ......... -- -- 26,949 --
--- -------- -------- -------
2,133 $192,500 $137,145 $82,304
===== ======== ======== =======
The Operating Partnership is optimistic about the operating prospects of
the Communities under construction even with the increased supply of newly
constructed apartment homes of comparable quality in many of its markets. As
with any development project, there are uncertainties and risks associated with
the development of the Communities described above. While the Operating
Partnership has prepared development budgets and has estimated completion and
stabilization target dates based on what it believes are reasonable assumptions
in light of current conditions, there can be no assurance that actual costs
will not exceed current budgets or that the Operating Partnership will not
experience construction delays due to the unavailability of materials, weather
conditions or other events. Similarly, market conditions at the time these
Communities become available for leasing will affect rental rates and the
period of time necessary to achieve stabilization, and could result in
achieving stabilization later than currently anticipated.
The Operating Partnership is also conducting feasibility and other
pre-development work for twelve new Communities. The Operating Partnership
either owns or holds options to purchase the land for each of these potential
developments. For each of these potential Communities, the Operating
Partnership is only in the pre-development phase, and there can be no assurance
that all, or any one, of these Communities will be completed. See "Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations --
Development Activity" for a discussion of uncertainties and risks associated
with the Operating Partnership's development activity.
While the Operating Partnership has emphasized development of new
apartment communities as one of its strategies for growth, it also has
successfully capitalized on expansion opportunities through the strategic
acquisition of properties that meet the Operating Partnership's investment
criteria. The Operating Partnership has acquired more than 8,612 apartment
homes since its formation in 1994. These properties were successfully acquired
at prices below their replacement cost and cumulatively have achieved a total
unleveraged average yield of 9.86% in 1998. Acquisitions have been concentrated
in the
5
Operating Partnership's targeted core markets in order to further strengthen
brand identity and operational efficiencies. The Operating Partnership's
extensive local-market knowledge and development expertise give it an advantage
in identifying and underwriting acquisition opportunities which the Operating
Partnership believes will create shareholder value. The Operating Partnership
acquired the following Communities in 1998 (dollars in thousands):
ACQUISITION APARTMENT PURCHASE YEAR
COMMUNITY DATE HOMES PRICE BUILT
- -------------------------------------------- ------------- ----------- ---------- -------------
Summit St. Clair -- Atlanta, GA ............ 3/1/98 336 $ 27,100 1997
Summit Club at Dunwoody -- Atlanta, GA ..... 5/22/98 324 27,400 1997
Summit Lenox -- Atlanta, GA ................ 7/8/98 432 33,800 1965
Ewing Portfolio (1) ........................ 11/4/98 2,465 179,700 1994 to 1998
----- --------
3,557 $268,000
===== ========
- ---------
(1) Includes four Communities located in Dallas, Texas, two Communities located
in Austin, Texas and one Community in San Antonio, Texas. The purchase of
one of the Communities located in Dallas, Texas was not completed until
December 31, 1998.
During 1998, the Operating Partnership disposed of eight communities for
over $130 million. These Communities did not align with the Operating
Partnership's overall long term strategic plan and growth objectives. The
prices realized for the 1998 dispositions represent a cost of capital below
what could have been achieved through other capital sources, such as common
equity. As long as this remains the case, the Operating Partnership anticipates
continuing to use property sales as a source of capital.
DEDICATION TO CUSTOMER SERVICE. Pro-active property management has allowed
the Operating Partnership to maximize cash flow from its portfolio by
encouraging local decision-making and rewarding performance, initiative and
innovation. The Operating Partnership's localized property management system,
with offices strategically located in seven key cities, gives the Operating
Partnership a distinct advantage in better responding to the needs of each
market. The Operating Partnership has long stressed the importance of
developing strong customer relationships with its residents. The Operating
Partnership's total commitment to resident satisfaction is further evidenced by
its "Sundown Policy", which mandates a response by the appropriate associate to
any resident inquiry or complaint no later than "sundown" of the day on which
the inquiry or complaint was received.
The Operating Partnership has sought to provide its residents with
experienced, well-trained and attentive management staffs. Every Community
associate enters into a comprehensive training program when he or she is hired.
This training program ensures that associates have a clear understanding of
their job responsibilities, the high standards of performance expected of them
and the Operating Partnership's operating philosophies. On-going training
following each associate's initial employment period further enhances associate
productivity. The Operating Partnership believes that this training regimen
along with a proven hiring process has produced a higher quality management
staff, evidenced by higher resident satisfaction at the Communities and lower
associate turnover.
THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, Summit
Properties has the exclusive power to manage and conduct the business of the
Operating Partnership, subject to certain voting rights of holders (including
Summit Properties) of the units of limited partnership interest ("Units"),
including the consent of holders (including Summit Properties) of 85% of the
Units in connection with a sale, transfer or other disposition of all or
substantially all of the assets of the Operating Partnership, or any other
transaction which would result in the recognition of a significant taxable gain
to the holders of Units. As of December 31, 1998, Summit Properties' general
and limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership entitle it to
share in 86.2% of the cash distributions from, and in the profits and losses
of, the Operating Partnership.
Each Unit may be redeemed by the holder thereof for cash equal to the fair
market value of a share of Summit Properties' Common Stock or, at the option of
Summit Properties, an equivalent number of shares of Common Stock. Summit
Properties presently anticipates that it will elect to issue shares of Common
Stock in connection with redemptions of Units rather than paying cash. With
each redemption of Units for Common Stock, Summit Properties' percentage
ownership interest in the Operating Partnership will increase. In addition,
whenever the Summit Properties issues shares of Common Stock for cash, Summit
Properties will contribute any net proceeds therefrom to the Operating
Partnership and the Operating Partnership will issue an equivalent number of
Units to the Summit Properties.
6
The Operating Partnership cannot be terminated, except in connection with
a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Operating Partnership,
for a period of 99 years from the date of formation without a vote of the
limited partners of the Operating Partnership.
OPERATING PARTNERSHIP HISTORY
The Operating Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, was formed on
January 14, 1994 to continue and expand the multifamily development,
construction, acquisition, operation, management and leasing businesses of the
predecessor entities through which the Operating Partnership historically
conducted operations prior to the Initial Offering (as defined below) (the
"Summit Entities"). The Summit Entities were founded by William B. McGuire,
Jr., in 1972. In 1981, William F. Paulsen joined the predecessor to the
Operating Partnership as Chief Executive Officer and shepherded the growth of
its multifamily development and management activities.
Summit Properties organized itself as a real estate investment trust (a
"REIT") and completed its initial public offering (the "Initial Offering") of
10,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Common Stock") on
February 15, 1994 and sold an additional 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock upon
exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option on March 4, 1994. The
proceeds from the Initial Offering were used to acquire a controlling interest
in the Operating Partnership. On June 2, 1995, Summit Properties completed a
follow-on public offering (the "1995 Offering") of 4,000,000 shares of Common
Stock. A second follow-on public offering (the "1996 Offering") of 5,000,000
shares of the Common Stock was completed on August 7, 1996, with an additional
750,000 shares of Common Stock sold upon exercise of the underwriters'
over-allotment option on August 12, 1996. In addition, Summit Properties has
adopted a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase program for the sale of up to
2,500,000 shares of Common Stock, pursuant to which it sells Common Stock from
time to time. The proceeds of the 1995 Offerings, 1996 Offerings and dividend
reinvestment and stock purchase plans were contributed by Summit Properties to
the Operating Partnership in exchange for Units.
On August 12, 1997, the Operating Partnership completed a $125 million
senior unsecured debt offering. On December 12, 1997, the Operating Partnership
completed an additional $30 million senior unsecured debt offering. The
Operating Partnership has established a program for the sale of up to $95
million aggregate principal amount of Medium-Term Notes due nine months or more
from the date of issuance (the "MTN Program"). On July 28, 1998, the Operating
Partnership sold $30 million of notes under the MTN Program. On October 5,
1998, the Operating Partnership sold $25 million of notes under the MTN
Program.
The executive offices of the Operating Partnership are located at 212
South Tryon Street, Suite 500, Charlotte, North Carolina 28281. The Operating
Partnership's telephone number is (704) 334-9905 and its facsimile number is
(704) 333-8340. The Operating Partnership also maintains offices in Atlanta,
Georgia; Tampa, Florida; Bethesda, Maryland; Ft. Lauderdale, Florida; Dallas,
Texas and Raleigh, North Carolina.
7
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
THE COMMUNITIES
The Operating Partnership owns and operates 66 completed Communities and
five Communities which are currently under construction and in lease-up, for a
total of 18,001 apartment homes. Forty-two of the Communities have been
completed since January 1, 1990 and, as of December 31, 1998, the average age
of the completed Communities was approximately 7 years. The following is a
summary of Communities by market:
NUMBER OF % OF TOTAL
NUMBER OF APARTMENT APARTMENT
COMMUNITIES HOMES HOMES
------------- ----------- -----------
Washington, DC ......................... 9 2,543 14.1%
Raleigh/Central North Carolina ......... 11 2,300 12.8%
South Florida .......................... 7 2,019 11.2%
Atlanta, Georgia ....................... 6 2,009 11.2%
Charlotte, North Carolina .............. 12 1,860 10.4%
Tampa/Sarasota, Florida ................ 7 1,574 8.7%
Dallas, Texas .......................... 4 1,359 7.5%
Other non core markets ................. 5 1,098 6.1%
Richmond, Virginia ..................... 3 862 4.8%
Austin, Texas .......................... 2 856 4.8%
Orlando, Florida ....................... 2 656 3.6%
Indianapolis, Indiana .................. 1 314 1.7%
Columbus, Ohio ......................... 1 301 1.7%
San Antonio, Texas ..................... 1 250 1.4%
-- ----- -----
71 18,001 100.0%
== ====== =====
Other non-core markets consist of two Communities in Greenville, South
Carolina, two Communities in Cincinnati, Ohio, and one Community in Yardley,
Pennsylvania.
All of the Communities target middle to upper income apartment renters as
customers and have amenities, apartment home sizes and mixes consistent with
the desires of this resident population. The Communities are owned in fee
simple and are located in seven states throughout the southeastern,
southwestern and mid-atlantic United States (Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia) as well as in Delaware, Ohio,
Indiana and Pennsylvania. The following table highlights certain information
regarding the Communities:
8
AVERAGE
NUMBER OF YEAR APARTMENT
MARKET AREA/COMMUNITY LOCATION APARTMENTS COMPLETED SIZE
- --------------------------------------- -------------------- ------------ ----------- -----------
ATLANTA
Summit Glen ........................... Atlanta, GA 242 1992 983
Summit Village ........................ Marietta, GA 323 1991 984
--- ---
ATLANTA WEIGHTED AVERAGE .............. 565 984
CHARLOTTE
Summit Arbors ......................... Charlotte, NC 120 1986 944
Summit Crossing ....................... Charlotte, NC 128 1985 978
Summit Fairview ....................... Charlotte, NC 135 1983 1,036
Summit Foxcroft (4) ................... Charlotte, NC 156 1979 940
Summit Norcroft ....................... Charlotte, NC 162 1991 1,112
Summit Radbourne ...................... Charlotte, NC 225 1991 1,006
Summit Simsbury ....................... Charlotte, NC 100 1985 874
Summit Touchstone ..................... Charlotte, NC 132 1986 899
--- -----
CHARLOTTE WEIGHTED AVERAGE ............ 1,158 982
RALEIGH/CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA
Summit Creekside ...................... Hickory, NC 118 1981 1,006
Summit Eastchester .................... High Point, NC 172 1981 947
Summit Highland ....................... Raleigh, NC 172 1987 986
Summit Mayfaire ....................... Raleigh, NC 144 1995 1,047
Summit Oak ............................ Goldsboro, NC 100 1982 918
Summit Sherwood ....................... Winston-Salem, NC 190 1968 1,028
Summit Square ......................... Durham, NC 362 1990 925
----- -----
RALEIGH/CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ..................... 1,258 973
RICHMOND
Summit Breckenridge ................... Glen Allen, VA 300 1987 928
Summit Stony Point .................... Richmond, VA 250 1986 1,045
Summit Waterford ...................... Midlothian, VA 312 1990 995
----- -----
RICHMOND WEIGHTED AVERAGE ............. 862 986
SOUTH FLORIDA
Summit Del Ray ........................ Delray Beach, FL 252 1993 968
Summit Palm Lake ...................... W. Palm Beach, FL 304 1992 919
Summit Plantation I ................... Plantation, FL 262 1995 1,283
----- -----
SOUTH FLORIDA WEIGHTED AVERAGE ........ 818 1,051
TAMPA/SARASOTA
Summit Gateway ........................ St. Petersburg, FL 212 1987 828
Summit Hampton ........................ Bradenton, FL 352 1988 933
Summit Heron's Run .................... Sarasota, FL 274 1990 863
Summit Lofts .......................... Palm Harbour, FL 200 1990 1,045
Summit McIntosh ....................... Sarasota, FL 212 1990 855
Summit Perico ......................... Bradenton, FL 256 1990 911
Summit Walk ........................... Tampa, FL 68 1993 1,614
----- -----
TAMPA/SARASOTA WEIGHTED AVERAGE ....... 1,574 936
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Summit Belmont ........................ Fredricksburg, VA 300 1987 881
Summit Meadow ......................... Columbia, MD 178 1990 1,020
Summit Pike Creek ..................... Newark, DE 264 1988 899
Summit Reston ......................... Reston, VA 418 1987 854
Summit Windsor ........................ Frederick, MD 147 1989 903
----- -----
WASHINGTON, D.C. WEIGHTED AVERAGE ..... 1,307 897
OTHER
Summit Blue Ash ....................... Blue Ash, OH 242 1992 1,158
Summit Park ........................... Forest Park, OH 316 1989 963
Summit Beacon Ridge ................... Greenville, SC 144 1988 1,046
Summit East Ridge ..................... Greenville, SC 180 1986 959
----- -----
OTHER WEIGHTED AVERAGE ................ 882 1,029
----- -----
TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF
COMMUNITIES FULLY STABILIZED ......... 8,424 971
----- -----
DEVELOPED COMMUNITIES (7)
Summit Aventura ....................... Aventura, FL 379 1995 1,106
Summit Fairways ....................... Orlando, FL 240 1996 1,302
Summit on the River ................... Atlanta, GA 352 1997 1,103
Summit River Crossing ................. Indianapolis, IN 314 1996 1,060
Summit Russett ........................ Laurel, MD 314 1997 958
----- -----
1,599 1,097
MORTGAGE
AVERAGE AVERAGE NOTES
AVERAGE AVERAGE MONTHLY MONTHLY PAYABLE AT
PHYSICAL PHYSICAL RENTAL RENTAL DECEMBER 31,
OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY REVENUE REVENUE 1998
MARKET AREA/COMMUNITY 1998 (1) 1997 (1) 1998 (2) 1997 (2) (IN THOUSANDS)
- --------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ---------- ---------------
ATLANTA
Summit Glen ........................... 94.9 92.8 $ 886 $ 838 (3)
Summit Village ........................ 94.2 91.5 747 728 (3)
---- ---- ----- -----
ATLANTA WEIGHTED AVERAGE .............. 94.5 92.0 806 775
CHARLOTTE
Summit Arbors ......................... 96.4 94.7 833 790 --
Summit Crossing ....................... 94.1 93.5 678 664 $4,106
Summit Fairview ....................... 92.1 95.7 797 751 --
Summit Foxcroft (4) ................... 92.2 93.2 686 660 2,663
Summit Norcroft ....................... 93.1 93.2 788 765 (3)
Summit Radbourne ...................... 92.8 93.3 777 773 8,507
Summit Simsbury ....................... 93.7 94.0 776 743 (5)
Summit Touchstone ..................... 93.8 92.3 707 700 (5)
---- ---- ----- -----
CHARLOTTE WEIGHTED AVERAGE ............ 93.4 93.7 755 733
RALEIGH/CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA
Summit Creekside ...................... 94.9 95.7 612 596 --
Summit Eastchester .................... 94.8 93.7 618 593 --
Summit Highland ....................... 95.0 93.8 712 708 (3)
Summit Mayfaire ....................... 93.2 92.8 783 770 --
Summit Oak ............................ 95.5 96.1 571 551 2,519
Summit Sherwood ....................... 92.3 94.9 594 561 3,274
Summit Square ......................... 91.7 91.8 786 761 (3)
---- ---- ----- -----
RALEIGH/CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA
WEIGHTED AVERAGE ..................... 93.5 93.6 690 669
RICHMOND
Summit Breckenridge ................... 91.8 95.3 747 742 --
Summit Stony Point .................... 93.8 95.7 786 760 (6)
Summit Waterford ...................... 92.9 93.7 732 705 (3)
---- ---- ----- -----
RICHMOND WEIGHTED AVERAGE ............. 92.8 94.8 753 734
SOUTH FLORIDA
Summit Del Ray ........................ 92.0 94.8 893 852 (3)
Summit Palm Lake ...................... 93.4 95.2 796 764 (3)
Summit Plantation I ................... 92.3 91.7 1,040 1,034 --
---- ---- ----- -----
SOUTH FLORIDA WEIGHTED AVERAGE ........ 92.6 93.9 904 877
TAMPA/SARASOTA
Summit Gateway ........................ 94.9 95.6 671 644 (6)
Summit Hampton ........................ 90.6 89.7 638 625 (6)
Summit Heron's Run .................... 93.7 90.7 697 674 (3)
Summit Lofts .......................... 93.4 93.2 737 689 --
Summit McIntosh ....................... 92.2 89.5 694 696 --
Summit Perico ......................... 90.2 89.2 675 671 (3)
Summit Walk ........................... 92.9 94.5 1,133 1,098 --
---- ---- ----- -----
TAMPA/SARASOTA WEIGHTED AVERAGE ....... 92.3 91.2 700 682
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Summit Belmont ........................ 95.4 94.9 675 633 (6)
Summit Meadow ......................... 94.2 95.4 928 900 (3)
Summit Pike Creek ..................... 94.3 94.1 842 838 (6)
Summit Reston ......................... 93.3 94.0 1,014 965 --
Summit Windsor ........................ 93.6 90.7 725 686 (3)
---- ---- ----- -----
WASHINGTON, D.C. WEIGHTED AVERAGE ..... 94.1 94.0 857 823
OTHER
Summit Blue Ash ....................... 92.7 94.8 883 827 (3)
Summit Park ........................... 92.8 92.0 663 633 --
Summit Beacon Ridge ................... 96.0 93.6 667 657 --
Summit East Ridge ..................... 96.6 95.1 569 565 5,042
---- ---- ----- -----
OTHER WEIGHTED AVERAGE ................ 94.1 93.7 705 676
---- ---- ----- -----
TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF
COMMUNITIES FULLY STABILIZED ......... 93.3 93.3 763 739
---- ---- ----- -----
DEVELOPED COMMUNITIES (7)
Summit Aventura ....................... 91.1 91.7 1,076 1,083 --
Summit Fairways ....................... 91.9 81.3 919 891 --
Summit on the River ................... 93.9 71.2 844 792 --
Summit River Crossing ................. 92.5 93.3 863 817 --
Summit Russett ........................ 96.1 58.7 912 883 --
9
AVERAGE
NUMBER OF YEAR APARTMENT
MARKET AREA/COMMUNITY LOCATION APARTMENTS COMPLETED SIZE
- ----------------------------------- -------------------- ------------ ----------- -----------
ACQUISITION COMMUNITIES
1997 ACQUISITIONS
Summit Sand Lake .................. Orlando, FL 416 1995 1,035
Summit Portofino .................. Broward County, FL 322 1995 1,307
Summit Windsor II ................. Frederick, MD 306 1988 903
Summit Fair Oaks (8) .............. Fairfax, VA 246 1990 938
--- -----
1,290 1,053
1998 ACQUISITIONS
Summit St. Clair .................. Atlanta, GA 336 1997 969
Summit Club at Dunwoody ........... Atlanta, GA 324 1997 1,007
Summit Lenox ...................... Atlanta, GA 432 1965 963
Summit Belcourt ................... Dallas, TX 180 1994 875
Summit Buena Vista ................ Dallas, TX 467 1996 925
Summit Camino Real ................ Dallas, TX 364 1998 850
Summit Turtle Cove ................ Dallas, TX 348 1996 869
Summit Los Arboles ................ Austin, TX 408 1996 847
Summit Las Palmas (9) ............. Austin, TX 448 1998 890
Summit Turtle Rock ................ San Antonio, TX 250 1995 857
----- -----
3,557 907
----- -----
TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF
STABILIZED COMMUNITIES ........... 14,870 977
------ -----
COMMUNITIES IN
LEASE-UP (10)
Summit Ballantyne I ............... Charlotte, NC 246 1997 1,049
Summit Sedgebrook I ............... Charlotte, NC 248 1997 1,017
Summit Norcroft II ................ Charlotte, NC 54 1997 1,168
Summit Ballantyne II .............. Charlotte, NC 154 1998 1,057
Summit Lake I ..................... Raleigh, NC 302 1998 1,048
Summit Governor's Village ......... Raleigh, NC 242 1999 1,134
Summit Westwood ................... Raleigh, NC 354 1999 1,112
Summit Lake II .................... Raleigh, NC 144 1999 1,101
Summit Plantation II .............. Plantation, FL 240 1997 1,173
Summit New Albany ................. Columbus, OH 301 1998 1,235
Summit Stonefield ................. Yardley, PA 216 1998 1,022
Summit Doral ...................... Miami, FL 260 1999 1,172
Summit Fair Lakes I ............... Fairfax, VA 370 1999 996
------ -----
3,131 1,094
------ -----
TOTAL COMMUNITIES ................. 18,001 997
====== =====
MORTGAGE
AVERAGE AVERAGE NOTES
AVERAGE AVERAGE MONTHLY MONTHLY PAYABLE AT
PHYSICAL PHYSICAL RENTAL RENTAL DECEMBER 31,
OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY REVENUE REVENUE 1998
MARKET AREA/COMMUNITY 1998 (1) 1997 (1) 1998 (2) 1997 (2) (IN THOUSANDS)
- ----------------------------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ---------------
ACQUISITION COMMUNITIES
1997 ACQUISITIONS
Summit Sand Lake .................. 93.1 93.8 797 775 14,679
Summit Portofino .................. 93.7 93.7 985 977 --
Summit Windsor II ................. 93.6 90.2 725 679 (3)
Summit Fair Oaks (8) .............. 95.8 N/A 938 N/A --
1998 ACQUISITIONS
Summit St. Clair .................. 95.2 N/A 968 N/A (3)
Summit Club at Dunwoody ........... 96.6 N/A 879 N/A --
Summit Lenox ...................... 94.9 N/A 955 N/A --
Summit Belcourt ................... 97.7 N/A 1,090 N/A 9,708
Summit Buena Vista ................ 92.1 N/A 845 N/A 25,779
Summit Camino Real ................ 91.7 N/A 755 N/A --
Summit Turtle Cove ................ 89.2 N/A 790 N/A 17,073
Summit Los Arboles ................ 92.7 N/A 807 N/A 20,240
Summit Las Palmas (9) ............. N/A N/A N/A N/A --
Summit Turtle Rock ................ 97.8 N/A 746 N/A 11,001
TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF
STABILIZED COMMUNITIES ...........
COMMUNITIES IN
LEASE-UP (10)
Summit Ballantyne I ............... 83.6 18.7 852 865 --
Summit Sedgebrook I ............... 83.3 16.7 763 717 --
Summit Norcroft II ................ 91.9 8.2 788 816 --
Summit Ballantyne II .............. 46.1 N/A 802 N/A --
Summit Lake I ..................... 73.3 4.7 861 735 --
Summit Governor's Village ......... 28.3 N/A 714 N/A --
Summit Westwood ................... 13.7 N/A 883 N/A --
Summit Lake II .................... N/A N/A N/A N/A --
Summit Plantation II .............. 87.9 19.5 1,051 1,036 --
Summit New Albany ................. 27.8 N/A 915 N/A --
Summit Stonefield ................. 96.8 20.4 1,110 1,101 --
Summit Doral ...................... 8.0 N/A 1,087 N/A --
Summit Fair Lakes I ............... 20.3 N/A 1,108 N/A --
TOTAL COMMUNITIES .................
- ---------
(1) Average physical occupancy is defined as the number of apartment homes
occupied divided by the total number of apartment homes contained in the
Communities, expressed as a percentage. Average physical occupancy has
been calculated using the average occupancy that existed on Sunday during
each week of the period.
(2) Represents the average monthly net rental revenue per occupied apartment
home.
(3) Collateral for fixed rate mortgage of $146.7 million.
(4) Summit Foxcroft is held by a partnership in which the Operating Partnership
is a 75% managing general partner.
(5) Collateral for a fixed rate mortgage of $8.5 million.
(6) Collateral for letters of credit in an aggregate amount of $52.9 million
which serve as collateral for $51.8 million in tax exempt bonds.
(7) Communities that were stabilized in 1998 but were stabilized subsequent to
January 1, 1996.
(8) Summit Fair Oaks was acquired on December 31, 1997 and, accordingly, no
average occupancy or average rent information is available for 1997.
(9) Summit Las Palmas was acquired effective December 31, 1998 and,
accordingly, no average occupancy or average rent information is available
for 1998.
(10) Communities that were in lease-up during 1998. These Communities have and
are leasing at a rate consistent with the Operating Partnership's
expectations. As with any Community in lease-up, there are uncertainties
and risks associated with the Operating Partnership's Communities in
lease-up. While the Operating Partnership has estimated completion
10
and stabilization budgets and target dates based on what it believes are
reasonable assumptions in light of current conditions, there can be no
assurance that actual costs will not exceed current budgets or that the
Operating Partnership will not experience delays in reaching stabilization
of such Communities.
Information with respect to total debt secured by thirty-four of the
Operating Partnership's Communities having an aggregate net book value of
$433.5 million as of December 31, 1998, is as follows (in thousands):
FIXED RATE VARIABLE RATE
------------------- ----------------
Total principal ..................... $279,801 $51,802
Interest rates range from ........... 6.24% to 9.80% 5.55%(1)
Weighted average interest rate ...... 6.72% 5.55%(1)
Annual debt service ................. $23,656 $ 3,587(2)
Scheduled annual maturities of secured debt is as follows:
1999 ................... $ 6,205
2000 ................... 6,573
2001 ................... 6,803
2002 ................... 15,319
2003 ................... 7,586
Thereafter ............. 289,117
---------
Total .................. $ 331,603
=========
- ---------
(1) Interest rate as of December 31, 1998.
(2) Annual debt service for variable rate loans represents 1998 costs and
includes letter of credit fees and other bond related costs.
Each Community has many of the following features: swimming pools, tennis
courts, racquetball courts, volleyball courts, saunas, whirlpools, fitness
facilities, picnic areas, large clubhouses and convenient parking facilities.
Most of the apartment homes offer amenities that include spacious open living
areas, sunrooms, patios or balconies, sunken living rooms, fireplaces, built-in
shelves or entertainment centers, large storage areas or walk-in closets,
vaulted ceilings, ceiling fans and separate in-home laundry facilities or
laundry hook-ups. In addition to these physical amenities, each Community has
its own highly-trained and experienced on-site management and maintenance staff
to ensure that courteous and responsive service is provided to its residents.
COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT
Each of the Communities is operated by the Operating Partnership's
property management staff. The management team for each Community includes
supervision by a regional vice-president and regional property manager, as well
as on-site management, maintenance personnel and an off-site support staff.
Community management teams perform leasing and rent collection functions and
coordinate resident services. All personnel are extensively trained and
experienced and are encouraged to continue their education through both
Operating Partnership-designed and outside courses.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Neither the Operating Partnership nor any of the Communities is presently
subject to any material litigation nor, to the Operating Partnership's
knowledge, is any litigation threatened against the Operating Partnership or
any of the Communities, other than routine actions for negligence or other
claims and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability insurance and
all of which collectively are not expected to have a material adverse effect on
the business or financial condition or results of operations of the Operating
Partnership.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
NONE
11
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
There is no established public trading market for the Units. As of March
11, 1999, there were 112 holders of record of Units.
The Operating Partnership declared a distribution of $0.4075 per Unit for
each of the four quarters in 1998, which was paid on May 15, 1998 for the first
quarter, August 14, 1998 for the second quarter, November 16, 1998 for the
third quarter, and February 15, 1999 for the fourth quarter.
The Operating Partnership declared a distribution of $0.3975 per Unit for
each of the four quarters in 1997, which was paid on May 15, 1997 for the first
quarter, August 15, 1997 for the second quarter, November 17, 1997 for the
third quarter, and February 14, 1998 for the fourth quarter.
During the three months ended December 31, 1998 the Operating Partnership
has issued Units in private placements in reliance on the exemption from
registration under section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Securities Act") in the amounts and for the consideration set forth below:
A. Summit Properties issued an aggregate of 346,450 shares of Common Stock
pursuant to its Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Summit Properties contributed
the proceeds (approximately $5.9 million) of these sales to the Operating
Partnership in consideration of an aggregate of 346,450 Units.
B. In connection with the purchase of a portfolio of multifamily properties
in Texas (the "Ewing Portfolio"), the Operating Partnership issued (a) an
aggregate of 178,550 Units (valued at approximately $3.2 million at the
time of the acquisition) to the sellers of the Ewing Portfolio in partial
consideration of their interest in the properties and (b) 2.1 million
Units (valued at approximately $37.3 million at the time of the
acquisition) to Summit Properties in exchange for Summit Properties'
interest in certain of the properties, which were acquired through the
issuance of 2.1 million shares of Common Stock to the sellers of the Ewing
Portfolio.
C. Summit Properties has issued an aggregate of 4,900 shares of Common
Stock in connection with restricted stock awards. Each time a share of
Common Stock is issued in connection with such an award, the Operating
Partnership issues a Unit to Summit Properties; consequently, 4,900 Units
were issued to Summit Properties during the relevant period.
In light of the circumstances under which such Units were issued and
information obtained by the Operating Partnership in connection with such
transactions, management of Summit Properties, in its capacity as general
partner of the Operating Partnership, believes that the Operating Partnership
may rely on such exemption.
12
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial and other
information on a consolidated historical basis for the Operating Partnership
and its predecessors, Summit Entities, as of and for each of the years in the
five-year period ended December 31, 1998. This table should be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of Summit Properties
Partnership, L.P. and the Notes thereto included elsewhere herein.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, LP (HISTORICAL)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 (1)
------------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT AND PROPERTY INFORMATION)
OPERATING INFORMATION:
Revenue
Rental ................................................... $ 137,660 $ 109,827 $ 88,864 $ 70,773 $ 54,198
Property management (2) .................................. -- -- -- -- 536
Interest and other ....................................... 9,909 6,850 5,625 4,221 3,700
---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
Total ................................................. 147,569 116,677 94,489 74,994 58,434
---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
Property operating and maintenance expense (before
depreciation and amortization) ........................... 51,550 42,032 35,226 28,012 21,502
Property management expenses (2) .......................... -- -- -- -- 366
Interest expense .......................................... 33,506 21,959 17,138 14,802 14,067
Depreciation and amortization ............................. 28,997 22,652 18,208 15,141 11,700
REIT formation costs ...................................... -- -- -- -- 457
General and administrative expense ........................ 3,861 2,740 2,557 1,949 1,756
(Income) loss from equity investments ..................... 328 (274) 173 39 59
---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
Total ................................................. 118,242 89,109 73,302 59,943 49,907
---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
Income before gain on sale of real estate assets and
extraordinary items ...................................... 29,327 27,568 21,187 15,051 8,527
Gain on sale of real estate assets ........................ 37,148 4,366 -- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------
Income before extraordinary items ......................... $ 66,475 $ 31,934 $ 21,187 $ 15,051 $ 8,527
========== ========== ========== ========= ==========
Net income ................................................ $ 65,881 $ 31,934 $ 20,561 $ 14,512 $ 17,093
========== ========== ========== ========= ==========
Income per unit before extraordinary items -- basic and
diluted .................................................. $ 2.28 $ 1.17 $ .92 $ .83 $ .64
========== ========== ========== ========= ==========
Net income per unit -- basic and diluted .................. $ 2.26 $ 1.17 $ .90 $ .80 $ 1.28
========== ========== ========== ========= ==========
Dividends per unit ........................................ $ 1.63 $ 1.59 $ 1.55 $ 1.51 $ 1.29
========== ========== ========== ========= ==========
Weighted average units outstanding -- basic ............... 29,141 27,258 22,914 18,112 13,390
========== ========== ========== ========= ==========
OTHER INFORMATION:
Cash flow provided by (used in):
Operating activities ..................................... $ 63,808 $ 55,947 $ 41,176 $ 30,994 $ 17,525
Investing activities ..................................... (219,170) (175,907) (103,971) (63,734) (113,741)
Financing activities ..................................... 154,636 119,858 63,579 34,440 88,993
Funds from Operations (3) ................................. $ 58,242 $ 50,201 $ 39,391 $ 30,148 $ 20,120
Total completed communities (at end of period) ............ 66 61 51 46 32
Total apartment homes developed (4) ....................... 973 1,454 1,061 379 --
Total apartment homes acquired ............................ 3,557 1,434 262 2,025 1,332
Total apartment homes (at end of period) (5) .............. 16,631 14,462 11,788 10,465 8,061
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (6) .................... 2.51 1.93 1.78 1.65 1.52
BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION:
Real estate, before accumulated depreciation .............. $1,206,536 $ 913,033 $ 704,779 $ 586,264 $ 439,025
Total assets .............................................. 1,199,067 825,695 635,364 533,609 397,945
Total long-term debt ...................................... 726,103 474,673 309,933 297,010 249,009
Partners' equity .......................................... 416,512 311,570 303,416 217,496 138,089
13
- ---------
(1) For purposes of the 1994 Selected Financial Data, historical information is
presented both for the Operating Partnership and its predecessors, the
Summit Entities, provided that historical financial information for its
predecessors only includes information relating to the Communities held by
the Operating Partnership immediately following the Initial Offering and
the entities which provided property and general management services for
those Communities.
(2) Consists of revenues and expenses from property management services
provided to Communities owned by unrelated third parties and by certain
predecessor partnerships prior to the Initial Offering. Since the Initial
Offering, these services have been performed by the Management Company,
which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
(3) The White Paper on Funds from Operations approved by the Board of Governors
of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") in
March 1995 (the "White Paper") defines Funds from Operations as net income
(loss) (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles ("GAAP")), excluding gains (or losses) from debt restructuring
and sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and
amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and
joint ventures. The Operating Partnership believes Funds from Operations
is helpful to investors as a measure of the performance of an equity REIT
because, along with cash flows from operating activities, financing
activities and investing activities, it provides investors with an
understanding of the ability of the Operating Partnership to incur and
service debt and make capital expenditures. The Operating Partnership
computes Funds from Operations in accordance with the standards
established by the White Paper, which may differ from the methodology for
calculating Funds from Operations utilized by other equity REITs, and,
accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs. Funds from
Operations does not represent amounts available for management's
discretionary use because of needed capital expenditures or expansion,
debt service obligations, property acquisitions, development, dividends
and distributions or other commitments and uncertainties. Funds from
Operations should not be considered as an alternative to net income
(determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of the Operating
Partnership's financial performance or to cash flows from operating
activities (determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the
Operating Partnership's liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available
to fund the Operating Partnership's cash needs, including its ability to
make dividends/distributions. Funds from Operations is calculated as
follows (dollars in thousands):
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------
Income before gain on sale of real estate assets and
extraordinary items .................................. $29,327 $27,568 $21,187 $15,051 $ 8,527
Real estate depreciation ............................... 28,915 22,633 18,204 15,097 11,593
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Funds from Operations .................................. $58,242 $50,201 $39,391 $30,148 $20,120
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
(4) Represents the total number of apartment homes in Communities completed and
owned by the Operating Partnership during the period.
(5) Represents the total number of apartment homes in Communities completed and
owned by the Operating Partnership at the end of the period.
(6) The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing earnings
by fixed charges. For this purpose, earnings consist of pre-tax income
from continuing operations (including gains on sale of real estate) plus
fixed charges (excluding capitalized interest). Fixed charges consist of
interest expense (whether expensed or capitalized), the estimated interest
component of rent expense, and the amortization of debt issuance costs. To
date, the Operating Partnership has not issued any preferred stock;
therefore, the ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred
stock dividend requirements are the same as the ratios of earnings to
fixed charges presented.
14
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
This Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements, including
without limitation statements relating to the operating performance of fully
stabilized Communities, development activities of the Operating Partnership and
the implementation of the Operating Partnership's plan to address Year 2000
issues. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and
describe future plans, strategies and expectations of the Operating Partnership,
are generally identifiable by use of the words "believe," "expect," "intend,"
"anticipate," "estimate," "project" or similar expressions. The Operating
Partnership's ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or
strategies is inherently uncertain. Although the Operating Partnership believes
that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on
reasonable assumptions, the Operating Partnership's actual results and
performance of stabilized and development Communities and the actual costs,
progress and expenses with respect to its plan to address Year 2000 issues could
differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Factors which could have a material adverse effect on the operations and future
prospects of the Operating Partnership include, but are not limited to, changes
in: economic conditions generally and the real estate market specifically,
legislative/regulatory changes (including changes to laws governing the taxation
of real estate investment trusts ("REITs"), availability of capital, interest
rates, construction delays due to unavailability of materials, weather
conditions or other delays, competition, supply and demand for apartment
communities in the Operating Partnership's current and proposed market areas,
expenses of or delays in the identification and upgrade or replacement by the
Operating Partnership of its non-Year 2000 compliant computer information
systems and computer systems that do not relate to information technology, but
include embedded technology, the Year 2000 compliance of vendors (including
vendors of the Operating Partnership's computer information systems) or third
party service providers (including the Operating Partnership's primary bank and
payroll processor), generally accepted accounting principles, policies and
guidelines applicable to REITs, and those factors discussed in the second
paragraph under the heading "Operating Performance of the Operating
Partnership's Fully Stabilized Communities," in the section entitled
"Development Activity -- Certain Factors Affecting the Performance of
Development Communities," and in the section entitled "Year 2000" on pages 17,
27 and 28 respectively, of this Form 10-K. These risks and uncertainties should
be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should
not be placed on such statements.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements of Summit Properties Partnership, L.P. and
the Notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.
HISTORICAL RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Operating Partnership's net income is generated primarily from
operations of its Communities. The changes in operating results from period to
period reflect changes in existing Community performance and increases in the
number of apartment homes due to development and acquisition of new
Communities. Where appropriate, comparisons are made on a "fully stabilized
Communities," "acquisition Communities," "stabilized development Communities"
and "Communities in lease-up" basis in order to adjust for changes in the
number of apartment homes. A Community is deemed to be "stabilized" when it has
attained a physical occupancy level of at least 93%. A Community which the
Operating Partnership has acquired is deemed fully stabilized when owned by the
Operating Partnership for one year or more as of the beginning of the year. A
Community which the Operating Partnership has developed is deemed "fully
stabilized" when stabilized for the two prior years as of the beginning of the
current year. A Community is deemed to be a "stabilized development" when
stabilized as of the beginning of the current year but not the entire two prior
years. All Communities information presented is before real estate depreciation
and amortization expense. Communities' average physical occupancy presented is
defined as the number of apartment homes occupied divided by the total number
of apartment homes contained in the Communities, expressed as a percentage.
Average physical occupancy has been calculated using the average of the
occupancy that existed on Sunday during each week of the period. Average
monthly rental revenue presented represents the average monthly net rental
revenue per occupied apartment home. The Operating Partnership's methodology
for calculating average physical occupancy and average monthly rental revenue
may differ from the methodology used by other equity REITs, and accordingly,
may not be comparable to such other REITs.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996
Income before gain on sale of real estate assets and extraordinary items
increased from 1996 ($21.2 million) to 1997 ($27.6 million) and from 1997 to
1998 ($29.3 million) primarily due to increased property operating income at
stabilized Communities, as well as new sources of income associated with
acquisition Communities and Communities in lease-up,
15
partially offset by a decrease in property income due to the disposal of
certain Communities and an increase in depreciation and interest expense.
OPERATING PERFORMANCE OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S PORTFOLIO OF COMMUNITIES
The operating performance of the Communities is summarized below (dollars
in thousands):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
1998 1997 % CHANGE 1997 1996 % CHANGE
---------- ---------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------------
Property revenues:
Stabilized Communities (1) ........................ $ 74,018 $ 72,013 2.8% $ 81,668 $80,296 1.7%
Acquisition Communities (2) ....................... 23,709 8,137 191.4% 12,467 2,250 454.1%
Stabilized Development Communities ................ 17,269 14,509 19.0% 12,375 8,762 41.2%
Communities in lease-up ........................... 14,865 2,293 548.3% 8,977 818 997.4%
Community sold .................................... 15,795 19,054 (17.1%) 519 1,421 (63.5%)
-------- -------- -------- -------
Total property revenues ............................. 145,656 116,006 25.6% 116,006 93,547 24.0%
-------- -------- -------- -------
Property operating and maintenance expense:
Stabilized Communities ............................ 27,081 26,720 1.4% 30,709 30,555 0.5%
Acquisition Communities ........................... 8,063 2,829 185.0% 4,336 606 615.5%
Stabilized Development Communities ................ 5,769 4,503 28.1% 3,955 3,069 28.9%
Communities in lease-up ........................... 4,761 955 398.5% 2,821 411 586.4%
Community sold .................................... 5,876 7,025 (16.4%) 211 585 (63.9%)
-------- -------- -------- -------
Total property operating and maintenance expense 51,550 42,032 22.6% 42,032 35,226 19.3%
-------- -------- -------- -------
Property operating income ........................... $ 94,106 $ 73,974 27.2% $ 73,974 $58,321 26.8%
======== ======== ======== =======
Apartment homes, end of period ...................... 18,001 14,980 20.2% 14,980 12,454 20.3%
======== ======== ======== =======
- ---------
(1) Includes Communities which were stabilized during the entire period for
each of the comparable periods presented.
(2) The 1998 and 1997 comparison includes the Communities acquired in 1998 and
1997. The 1997 and 1996 comparison includes Communities acquired in 1997
and 1996.
A summary of the Operating Partnership's apartment homes for the years ended
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 is as follows:
1998 1997 1996
----------- ---------- ---------
Apartment homes completed or in construction and lease-up:
At the beginning of the year ................................... 14,980 12,454 11,286
Acquisitions ................................................... 3,557 1,434 262
Developments which began rental operations during the year ..... 1,825 1,306 906
Sale of apartment homes ........................................ (2,361) (214) --
------ ------ ------
At the end of the year ......................................... 18,001 14,980 12,454
====== ====== ======
Completed apartment homes at the end of the year ................ 16,631 14,462 11,788
====== ====== ======
16
OPERATING PERFORMANCE OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S FULLY STABILIZED
COMMUNITIES
The operating performance of the Communities stabilized during the entire
period in both of the comparable periods presented is summarized below (dollars
in thousands except average monthly rental revenue):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------ -------------------------------------
1998 1997 % CHANGE 1997 1996 % CHANGE
------------ ------------ ---------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Property revenues:
Rental .............................................. $ 70,111 $ 68,558 2.3% $ 77,788 $ 76,443 1.8%
Other ............................................... 3,907 3,455 13.1% 3,880 3,853 0.7%
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total property revenues .............................. 74,018 72,013 2.8% 81,668 80,296 1.7%
-------- -------- -------- --------
Property operating and maintenance expense:
Personnel ........................................... 5,911 5,882 0.5% 6,905 7,289 (5.3%)
Advertising and promotion ........................... 1,057 1,030 2.6% 1,085 866 25.3%
Utilities ........................................... 3,216 3,123 3.0% 3,657 3,567 2.5%
Building repairs and maintenance .................... 5,821 5,977 (2.6%) 6,967 6,997 (0.4%)
Real estate taxes and insurance ..................... 7,058 6,849 3.1% 7,676 7,609 0.9%
Property supervision ................................ 1,772 1,739 1.9% 2,043 2,001 2.1%
Other operating expense ............................. 2,246 2,120 5.9% 2,376 2,226 6.7%
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total property operating and maintenance expense ..... 27,081 26,720 1.4% 30,709 30,555 0.5%
-------- -------- -------- --------
Property operating income ............................ $ 46,937 $ 45,293 3.6% $ 50,959 $ 49,741 2.4%
======== ======== ======== ========
Average physical occupancy ........................... 93.3% 93.3% 0.0% 93.2% 93.3% (0.1%)
======== ======== ======== ========
Average monthly rental revenue ....................... $ 763 $ 739 3.3% $ 717 $ 702 2.1%
======== ======== ======== ========
Number of apartment homes ............................ 8,424 8,424 9,872 9,872
======== ======== ======== ========
Number of apartment communities ...................... 39 39 44 44
======== ======== ======== ========
Rental and other revenue increased from 1997 to 1998 due to higher rental
rates. The 2.8% property revenue growth rate was higher than the prior year
rate of growth primarily as a result of a stronger demand in the markets in
which the Operating Partnership operates. The higher growth rate was especially
noticeable in the Sarasota and Atlanta markets. In 1999 the Operating
Partnership expects the rate of growth to be similar to the growth rate in 1998
given the current health of the national economy as well as a decline in
apartment permit issuance in some of the Operating Partnership's larger
markets. The Operating Partnership believes its expectations relative to
property revenue growth are based on reasonable assumptions as to future
economic conditions and the quantity of competitive multi-family communities in
the markets in which the Operating Partnership does business. However, there
can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from these assumptions,
which could result in a lower property revenue growth rate.
Property operating and maintenance expenses were relatively stable from
1997 to 1998 increasing by 1.4%. As a percentage of total property revenues,
property operating and maintenance expense decreased to 36.6% from 37.1% for
the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
Rental and other revenue increased from 1996 to 1997 due to higher rental
rates offset by decreased occupancy. Property operating and maintenance
expenses were relatively stable from 1996 to 1997. As a percentage of total
property revenues, property operating and maintenance expenses decreased to
37.6% from 38.1% for the years ended December 31, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
OPERATING PERFORMANCE OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S ACQUISITION COMMUNITIES
Acquisition Communities for the year ended December 31, 1998 consist of
the following: Summit Portofino, Summit Sand Lake, Summit Windsor II and Summit
Fair Oaks acquired in 1997 (1,290 units); and Summit St. Clair, Summit Club at
Dunwoody, Summit at Lenox and six communities (2,017 units) which were owned by
Ewing Industries and its affiliates in 1998 (a total of 3,109 units). Summit
Mayfaire (144 units), which was acquired effective January 1, 1997, is
considered a fully stabilized community in the 1998 and 1997 comparison and
therefore is not included in such comparison. Summit Fair Oaks (246 units) was
acquired on December 31, 1997, and accordingly, had no 1997 operations. Summit
Las Palmas, also acquired from Ewing Industries, was acquired effective
December 31, 1998, and, accordingly, its rental operations for 1998 are not
reflected in the Operating Partnership's financial statements. Summit
Plantation (262 units) was acquired on April 1, 1996 and is considered a fully
stabilized community in the 1998 and 1997 comparison and therefore is not
included
17
in such comparisons. The operations of these Communities are summarized as
follows (dollars in thousands except average monthly rental revenue):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------ ------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996
------------ ----------- ------------ -----------
Property revenues:
Rental .................................... $ 22,514 $ 7,564 $ 11,686 $ 2,134
Other ..................................... 1,195 573 781 116
-------- ------- -------- -------
Total property revenues .................... 23,709 8,137 12,467 2,250
Property operating and maintenance expense . 8,063 2,829 4,336 606
-------- ------- -------- -------
Property operating income .................. $ 15,646 $ 5,308 $ 8,131 $ 1,644
======== ======= ======== =======
Average physical occupancy ................. 93.8% 92.5% 92.4% 93.1%
======== ======= ======== =======
Average monthly rental revenue ............. $ 859 $ 813 $ 847 $ 993
======== ======= ======== =======
Number of apartment homes:
1996 Acquisitions ......................... -- -- 262 262
1997 Acquisitions ......................... 1,290 1,044 1,188 --
1998 Acquisitions ......................... 3,109 -- -- --
-------- ------- -------- -------
Total number of apartment homes ............ 4,399 1,044 1,450 262
======== ======= ======== =======
The decrease in the average monthly rental revenue for the year ended
December 31, 1997 as compared to the corresponding period in 1996 is
attributable to lower average monthly rental revenue on the 1997 acquisition
Communities in comparison to the 1996 acquisition Community. Average monthly
rental revenue for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 for the 1997
acquisitions alone was $834 and $813, respectively.
The unleveraged yield on investment for acquisition Communities, defined
as property operating income on an annualized basis divided by total
acquisition cost, for the year ended December 31, 1998 was 9.12%.
OPERATING PERFORMANCE OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S STABILIZED DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNITIES
The Operating Partnership had five Communities with 1,599 apartment homes
(Summit Aventura, Summit River Crossing, Summit Fairways, Summit on the River
and Summit Russett) which were stabilized during the entire year ended December
31, 1998 but were stabilized subsequent to January 1, 1996. The year ended
December 31, 1997 and 1996 comparison represents 1,200 apartment homes (Summit
Aventura, Summit River Crossing, Summit Hill II and Summit Green). The
operating performance of these stabilized development Communities is summarized
below (dollars in thousands except average monthly rental revenue):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------- ------------------------
1998 1997 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------ -----------
Property revenues:
Rental ................................... $ 16,024 $ 13,402 $ 11,580 $ 8,183
Other .................................... 1,245 1,107 795 579
-------- -------- -------- -------
Total property revenues ................... 17,269 14,509 12,375 8,762
Property operating and maintenance expense 5,769 4,503 3,955 3,069
-------- -------- -------- -------
Property operating income ................. $ 11,500 $ 10,006 $ 8,420 $ 5,693
======== ======== ======== =======
Average physical occupancy ................ 93.1% 79.5% 92.0% 65.6%
======== ======== ======== =======
Average monthly rental revenue ............ $ 927 $ 898 $ 883 $ 871
======== ======== ======== =======
Number of apartment homes ................. 1,599 1,599 1,200 1,200
======== ======== ======== =======
The unleveraged yield on stabilized development Communities, defined as
property operating income divided by total development cost, for the year ended
December 31, 1998 was 10.05%.
OPERATING PERFORMANCE OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S COMMUNITIES IN LEASE-UP
The Operating Partnership had thirteen Communities in lease-up during the
year ended December 31, 1998. A Community in lease-up is defined as one that
has commenced rental operations but was not stabilized as of the beginning of
the
18
current year. The following is a summary of the thirteen Communities in
lease-up during 1998 (dollars in thousands):
TOTAL ACTUAL/
NUMBER OF ACTUAL/ ANTICIPATED
APARTMENT ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION
COMMUNITY HOMES COST COMPLETION
- ---------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- --------------
Summit Ballantyne I -- Charlotte, NC (1) ........... 246 $ 16,380 Q4 1997
Summit Sedgebrook I -- Charlotte, NC (1) ........... 248 16,330 Q4 1997
Summit Plantation II -- Plantation, FL (1) ......... 240 21,240 Q4 1997
Summit Norcroft II -- Charlotte, NC (1) ............ 54 3,500 Q4 1997
Summit Stonefield -- Yardley, PA (1) ............... 216 19,650 Q1 1998
Summit Lake I -- Raleigh, NC (1) ................... 302 20,170 Q2 1998
Summit Ballantyne II -- Charlotte, NC .............. 154 10,227 Q4 1998
Summit New Albany I -- Fairfax, VA ................. 301 24,339 Q4 1998
Summit Fair Lakes I -- Fairfax, VA (2) ............. 370 32,900 Q1 1999
Summit Governor's Village -- Chapel Hill, NC (2) 242 16,700 Q1 1999
Summit Doral -- Miami, FL (2) ...................... 260 22,800 Q2 1999
Summit Westwood -- Raleigh, NC (2) ................. 354 24,400 Q3 1999
Summit Lake II -- Raleigh, NC (2)(3) ............... 144 10,200 Q2 1999
--- --------
3,131 $238,836
===== ========
% LEASED
ACTUAL/ AVERAGE AS OF
ANTICIPATED OCCUPANCY DECEMBER 31,
COMMUNITY STABILIZATION 1998 1998
- ---------------------------------------------------- --------------- ----------- -------------
Summit Ballantyne I -- Charlotte, NC (1) ........... Q3 1998 83.60% 86.60%
Summit Sedgebrook I -- Charlotte, NC (1) ........... Q3 1998 83.34% 95.20%
Summit Plantation II -- Plantation, FL (1) ......... Q3 1998 87.91% 96.60%
Summit Norcroft II -- Charlotte, NC (1) ............ Q1 1998 91.89% 92.10%
Summit Stonefield -- Yardley, PA (1) ............... Q1 1998 96.80% 99.10%
Summit Lake I -- Raleigh, NC (1) ................... Q3 1998 73.31% 96.00%
Summit Ballantyne II -- Charlotte, NC .............. Q1 1999 46.10% 89.60%
Summit New Albany I -- Fairfax, VA ................. Q3 1999 27.75% 53.50%
Summit Fair Lakes I -- Fairfax, VA (2) ............. Q2 1999 20.26% 52.20%
Summit Governor's Village -- Chapel Hill, NC (2) Q2 1999 28.31% 57.40%
Summit Doral -- Miami, FL (2) ...................... Q3 1999 7.95% 17.30%
Summit Westwood -- Raleigh, NC (2) ................. Q4 1999 13.67% 22.60%
Summit Lake II -- Raleigh, NC (2)(3) ............... Q3 1999 N/A N/A
- ---------
(1) These properties stabilized during 1998. The unleveraged yield on these six
Communities after reaching stabilization, defined as annualized property
operating income divided by total development cost, for the year ended
December 31, 1998 was 10.46%.
(2) These properties are included in the Construction in Progress category at
December 31, 1998.
(3) Summit Lake II started leasing apartments for January, 1999 move-ins.
OPERATING PERFORMANCE OF SUMMIT MANAGEMENT COMPANY
The operating performance of the Management Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, the Construction Company, is summarized below (dollars in
thousands):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------- ------------------------------
1998 1997 % CHANGE 1997 1996 % CHANGE
---------- --------- ------------ --------- ---------- ---------
Revenue ....................................... $6,396 $6,102 4.8% $6,102 $5,364 13.8%
Expenses:
Operating .................................... 5,893 5,039 16.9% 5,039 4,849 3.9%
Depreciation ................................. 244 185 31.9% 185 110 68.2%
Amortization ................................. 286 304 (5.9%) 304 278 9.4%
Interest ..................................... 300 300 0.0% 300 300 0.0%
------ ------ ------ ------
Total expenses ............................... 6,723 5,828 15.4% 5,828 5,537 5.3%
------ ------ ------ ------
Net income (loss) of Summit Management Company ($ 327) $ 274 -219.3% $ 274 ($ 173) 258.4%
====== ====== ====== ======
The change in revenue was a result of higher revenues from managing the
Operating Partnership's Communities and higher revenues from construction
activity, offset by lower revenues for managing third party Communities in each
of the years 1996 compared to 1997 and 1997 compared to 1998. The change in
operating expenses was a result of higher construction activity and higher
costs of managing the Communities in the years 1998 compared to 1997.
Total average third party apartment homes under management were 3,310,
5,164 and 7,919 during the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively. The decrease from 1997 to 1998 was primarily due to the
terminations of the Management Company contracts to manage two portfolios of
1,383 and 667 apartment homes, respectively. The contract to manage the 1,383
apartment home portfolio was terminated as a result of the portfolio changing
ownership. The decrease from 1996 to 1997 was primarily due to the termination
of the Management Company's contract to manage a portfolio of 1,422 apartment
homes effective December 31, 1996. The contract was terminated as a result of
the apartment portfolio changing ownership.
19
Property management fees include $1.2 million, $1.7 million and $2.3
million of fees from third parties for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997
and 1996, respectively. Property management fees from third parties as a
percentage of total property management revenues were 23.3%, 35.2% and 48.1%
for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The
Operating Partnership expects third party management revenue as a percentage of
total property management revenues to continue to decline as revenues from the
Operating Partnership's Communities continue to increase.
Construction Company revenues and expenses increased in 1998 compared to
1997 and in 1997 compared to 1996 primarily as a result of the Operating
Partnership's decision to expand its in-house construction operations in the
state of Florida to cover the entire geographic area in which the Operating
Partnership operates. All of the Construction Company's income for the years
ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 is from contracts with the Operating
Partnership. The Construction Company is currently building 63% of the
Operating Partnership's apartment homes under construction.
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES
Interest income increased by $672,000 to $1.1 million in 1998 compared to
1997, primarily due to interest earned on proceeds from property sales placed
in escrow in accordance with like-kind exchange income tax regulations.
Interest income decreased by $166,000 to $392,000 in 1997 compared to 1996,
primarily due to interest earned in 1996 on the proceeds from a common stock
offering prior to using the proceeds to fund development activity.
Other income increased $570,000 to $849,000 in 1998 compared to 1997,
primarily as a result of an incentive fee earned in connection with a property
that the Operating Partnership had developed and managed for a third party.
Depreciation expense increased $6.3 million or 28.0% to $29.0 million in
1998 compared to 1997, primarily due to depreciation expense related to the
Operating Partnership's 1997 and 1998 acquisitions and increased depreciation
of Communities in lease-up. Depreciation expense increased $4.4 million or
24.4% to $22.7 million in 1997 compared to 1996 due to an increase in
depreciation expense related to the 1997 acquisitions and Communities in
lease-up.
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs,
increased by $11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 1998 compared to the
year ended December 31, 1997. The increase was primarily the result of an
increase of $174.8 million in the Operating Partnership's average indebtedness
outstanding and an increase in the effective interest rate of .04% (6.68% to
6.72%). Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs
increased by $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 1997 compared to the
year ended December 31, 1996. The increase was primarily the result of an
increase of $84.9 million in the Operating Partnership's average indebtedness
outstanding and an increase in the effective interest rate of .24% (6.44% to
6.68%), respectively.
General and administrative expense has remained relatively stable as a
percentage of total revenues. As a percentage of total revenues, general and
administrative expenses were 2.6%, 2.3% and 2.7% in 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively.
The $37.1 million gain on sale of assets in 1998 resulted from the
disposition of eight Communities. The Operating Partnership retained a 25%
interest in five of these Communities. The eight Communities disposed of were:
COMMUNITY LOCATION
- ------------------------ ------------------
Summit Creek Charlotte, NC
Summit Hollow I & II Charlotte, NC
Summit Green Charlotte, NC
Summit Hill I & II Raleigh, NC
Summit Old Town Winston Salem, NC
Summit Springs Norcross, GA
Summit Providence Bradenton, FL
Summit Station Tampa, FL
The Communities disposed of in 1998 were part of the Operating
Partnership's plan to dispose of assets that no longer meet its growth
objectives, that are located in smaller markets, or to make desired changes in
the number of apartment homes in each of the Operating Partnership's markets.
The Operating Partnership believes that by concentrating its efforts and
capital in large growth markets it will gain a competitive advantage as it
improves operational efficiencies, builds a more significant brand name and
improves market knowledge. Also, by disposing of assets that no longer meet the
Operating Partnership's long-term growth objectives, capital is provided to
fund the development of new, higher growth assets. The $4.4 million gain on
sale of assets in 1997 resulted from the sale of a Community formerly known as
Summit Charleston in May 1997.
20
The extraordinary items in the year ended December 31, 1998 resulted from
the write-off of deferred financing costs in conjunction with the replacement
by the Operating Partnership of its prior unsecured credit facility with the
Unsecured Credit Facility (as hereafter defined) and prepayment penalties
incurred on six mortgage notes which were repaid during the period. The
extraordinary items in 1996 resulted primarily from the write-off of deferred
financing costs in conjunction with the repayment of debt with the proceeds
from a 1996 common stock offering and with the proceeds of the $31.0 million
unsecured debt financing received in August 1996.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
LIQUIDITY
The Operating Partnership's net cash provided by operating activities
increased from $55.9 million for the year ended December 31, 1997 to $63.8
million for the same period in 1998, primarily due to a $20.1 million increase
in property operating income offset by a $13.8 million increase in interest
paid. The increase in interest paid was primarily due to an increase in the
average indebtedness outstanding.
Net cash used in investing activities increased from $175.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 1997 to $219.2 million for the same period in 1998
due to an increase in the acquisition of Communities and an increase in the
construction of Communities, partially offset by higher proceeds from the
disposition of Communities. In 1998, the Operating Partnership acquired ten
apartment Communities containing 3,557 apartment homes for a total cost of
$268.0 million which included the issuance of $45.7 million worth of Units and
the assumption of $92.8 million in mortgage debt. In addition, the Operating
Partnership funded $128.4 million in development costs and $10.1 million in
capital improvements in 1998. The Operating Partnership had total net cash
proceeds of $130.6 million related to the disposition of Communities, of which
$116.5 million was deposited with a qualified intermediary. Approximately $30.2
million of funds deposited with a qualified intermediary were used to fund the
purchase of a Community and fund development costs. The remaining $86.3 million
in proceeds from the sales are being held in escrow in accordance with
like-kind exchange income tax rules and regulations to fund future
developments.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased from $119.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 1997 to $154.6 million for the same period in
1998, primarily due to an increase in equity proceeds from the Summit
Properties' dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan (the "Plan"), which
are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for Units, and an
increase in net borrowings from the Operating Partnership's credit facility
offset by a higher repayment of debt, lower borrowings on unsecured bonds, the
issuance of notes receivable from employees, the payment of higher
distributions to unitholders and a decrease in public stock issuance proceeds,
which are contributed to the Operating Partnership by Summit Properties in
exchange for Units. Financing activities in 1998 included $131.3 million in net
borrowings from the Operating Partnership's credit facility and $45.9 million
in net proceeds from the Plan. Dividend reinvestment and stock purchase
proceeds increased from 1997 primarily due to the replacement of the prior
dividend reinvestment plan with the Plan which allows direct stock purchases by
non-shareholders of Summit Properties. These cash inflows were offset by $46.8
million of distributions and the repayment of mortgage debt of $27.4 million.
Mortgage debt repayment included $23.2 million for the prepayment of six
mortgage notes.
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 2.51 to 1 for the year ended
December 31, 1998 compared to 1.93 to 1 for the year ended December 31, 1997.
The increase is primarily due to an increase in the gain on real estate assets
offset by increased interest charges as discussed in "Historical Results of
Operations -- Other Income and Expenses" above.
The Operating Partnership's outstanding indebtedness at December 31, 1998
totaled $726.1 million. This amount includes approximately $270.7 million in
fixed rate conventional mortgages, $51.8 million of variable rate tax-exempt
bonds, $241.0 million of unsecured notes, $9.1 million of tax-exempt fixed rate
loans, and $153.5 million under the Unsecured Credit Facility (as hereinafter
defined).
The Operating Partnership expects to meet its short-term liquidity
requirements (i.e., liquidity requirements arising within 12 months) including
recurring capital expenditures relating to maintaining its existing properties,
generally through its working capital, net cash provided by operating
activities and borrowings under its line of credit. The Operating Partnership
considers its cash provided by operating activities to be adequate to meet
operating requirements and to satisfy Summit Properties applicable REIT
dividend payment requirements in both the short term and in the long term.
The Operating Partnership expects to meet its long-term liquidity
requirements (i.e., liquidity requirements arising after 12 months), such as
scheduled mortgage debt maturities, property acquisitions, financing of
construction and development activities and other non-recurring capital
improvements, through the issuance of unsecured notes and equity securities,
from
21
undistributed Funds from Operations (see page 30), from proceeds received from
the disposition of certain properties, and in connection with the acquisition
of land or improved property through the issuance of Units in the Operating
Partnership.
LINE OF CREDIT
The Operating Partnership obtained a new syndicated unsecured line of
credit (the "Unsecured Credit Facility") in the amount of $175 million in
March, 1998 which replaced the existing $150 million credit facility. The
Unsecured Credit Facility was increased in December, 1998 to $200 million. The
Unsecured Credit Facility provides funds for new development, acquisitions and
general working capital purposes. The Unsecured Credit Facility has a three
year term with two one-year extension options and will initially bear interest
at LIBOR+90 basis points based upon the Operating Partnership's current credit
rating of BBB- by Standard & Poor's Rating Services and Baa3 by Moody's
Investors Service. The interest rate will be reduced in the event an upgrade of
the Operating Partnership's unsecured credit rating is obtained. The Unsecured
Credit Facility also provides a bid option sub-facility equal to a maximum of
fifty percent of the total facility ($100 million). This sub-facility provides
the Operating Partnership with the option to place borrowings in fixed LIBOR
contracts up to 180 days. Upon proper notifications, all lenders participating
in the Unsecured Credit Facility may, but are not obligated to, participate in
a competitive bid auction for these fixed LIBOR contracts.
MORTGAGE NOTES
On September 23, 1998, the Operating Partnership consolidated and renewed
two mortgage loans which had a $147.2 million balance. The original loans
matured in February 2001 ($118.3 million at 5.88%) and December 2005 ($28.9
million at 7.71%). The consolidation and renewal combined the two mortgage
loans into one loan at an interest rate equal to the existing weighted average
interest rate of the two previous mortgage loans (6.24%) up to February 2001.
As of February 2001, the rate of interest on the loan will increase to 6.76%
until the loan matures in October, 2008.
MEDIUM-TERM NOTES
The Operating Partnership has established a program for the sale of up to
$95 million aggregate principal amount of Medium-Term Notes due nine months or
more from the date of issuance (the "MTN Program"). On July 28, 1998, the
Operating Partnership sold $30 million of notes under the MTN Program. Such
notes are due on July 30, 2001 and bear interest at 6.75% per year. On October
5, 1998, the Operating Partnership sold $25 million of notes under the MTN
Program. Such notes are due on October 5, 2000 and bear interest at 6.71% per
year. Proceeds from the notes issued in both July and October, 1998 were used to
reduce the Unsecured Credit Facility.
SENIOR UNSECURED DEBT OFFERINGS
On August 12, 1997, the Operating Partnership completed a $125 million
senior unsecured debt offering comprised of three tranches. The first tranche,
$25 million of 6.80% Notes due August 15, 2002, was priced at 99.940% to yield
6.81%, or 73 basis points over the rate on US Treasury securities with a
comparable maturity (the "2002 Notes"). The second tranche, $50 million of
6.95% Notes due August 15, 2004, was priced at 99.764% to yield 6.99% or 81
basis points over the rate on US Treasury securities with a comparable maturity
(the "2004 Notes"). The third tranche, $50 million of 7.20% Notes due August
15, 2007, was priced at 99.830% to yield 7.22% or 104 basis points over the
rate on US Treasury securities with a comparable maturity (the "2007 Notes" and
together with the 2002 Notes and the 2004 Notes, the "August 1997 Notes"). The
proceeds from the August 1997 Notes were used to pay down the Operating
Partnership's unsecured line of credit.
On December 17, 1997, the Operating Partnership completed a $30 million
senior unsecured debt offering of 6.625% Notes due December 15, 2003. The Notes
were priced at 99.786% to yield 6.67%, or 95 basis points over the rate of US
Treasury securities with a comparable maturity (the "December 1997 Notes"). The
proceeds of the December 1997 Notes were used to pay down the Operating
Partnership's unsecured line of credit.
In August 1996, the Operating Partnership obtained $31.0 million of
unsecured debt financing from a bank consisting of a $15.0 million unsecured
note with a four-year term and a $16.0 million unsecured note with a six-year
term, which bear interest at 7.61% and 7.85%, respectively.
MARKET RISK
The fair market value of long-term fixed rate debt is subject to changes
in interest rates. Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt
will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The
estimated fair value of the Operating Partnership's total fixed rate long-term
debt at December 31, 1998 was $521.0 million. A 1% increase from
22
prevailing interest rates at December 31, 1998 would result in a decrease in
fair value of long-term debt by approximately $25.7 million. Fair values were
determined from quoted market prices, where available, and from information
received from investment bankers using current interest rates considering
credit ratings and remaining terms to maturity.
COMMON STOCK OFFERING
In August 1996, the Summit Properties completed the sale of 5.75 million
shares of Common Stock with net proceeds of $97.6 million. Approximately $97.6
million of the aggregate proceeds from the issuance of Common Stock, which was
contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for Units, and the $31
million unsecured bank debt financing were utilized to fully repay the
outstanding balances under the Operating Partnership's unsecured line of credit
and development loans. The remaining $30.9 million of the proceeds were used to
fund current development.
23
SCHEDULE OF DEBT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding debt
financing as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 (dollars in thousands):
PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING
DECEMBER 31,
INTEREST -----------------------
RATE AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1998 MATURITY DATE (1) 1998 1997
------------------ ------------------ ----------- -----------
FIXED RATE DEBT
- ------------------------------------------
MORTGAGE LOAN (2) ....................... 6.24% 8/15/08 $146,740 $149,593
MORTGAGE LOAN (3) ....................... 8.00% 9/1/05 8,470 8,557
MORTGAGE NOTES
Summit Foxcroft ....................... 8.00% 4/1/20 2,663 2,728
Summit Oak ............................ 7.75% 12/1/23 2,519 2,553
Summit Sherwood ....................... 7.88% 3/1/29 3,274 3,303
Summit Radbourne ...................... 9.80% 3/1/02 8,507 8,599
Summit Sand Lake ...................... 7.88% 2/15/06 14,679 14,985
Summit Buena Vista .................... 6.75% 1/15/07 25,779 --
Summit Belcourt ....................... 6.75% 12/1/05 9,708 --
Summit Turtle Cove .................... 6.75% 6/1/06 17,073 --
Summit Turtle Rock .................... 6.75% 11/1/05 11,001 --
Summit Los Arboles .................... 6.75% 12/1/05 20,240 --
Mortgage Notes paid in 1998 ........... -- 14,508
TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE NOTES
Summit Crossing ....................... 6.95% 11/1/25 4,106 4,162
Summit East Ridge ..................... 7.25% 12/1/26 5,042 5,100
-------- --------
TOTAL MORTGAGE DEBT .................. 279,801 214,088
UNSECURED NOTES
6.71 % Medium Term Notes due 2000 ..... 6.71% 10/5/00 25,000 --
6.75 % Medium Term Notes due 2001 ..... 6.75% 7/30/01 30,000 --
6.80 % Notes due 2002 ................. 6.80% 8/15/02 25,000 25,000
6.63 % Notes due 2003 ................. 6.63% 12/15/03 30,000 30,000
6.95 % Notes due 2004 ................. 6.95% 8/15/04 50,000 50,000
7.20 % Notes due 2007 ................. 7.20% 8/15/07 50,000 50,000
Bank Note ............................. 7.85% 8/3/02 16,000 16,000
Bank Note ............................. 7.61% 8/3/00 15,000 15,000
-------- --------
TOTAL UNSECURED NOTES ................ 241,000 186,000
-------- --------
TOTAL FIXED RATE DEBT ................ 520,801 400,088
VARIABLE RATE DEBT
- -------------------------------------------
UNSECURED CREDIT FACILITY ............... LIBOR +90 3/27/01 153,500 21,733
TAX EXEMPT BONDS (4)
Summit Belmont ........................ 5.55% 4/1/07 11,445 11,650
Summit Hampton ........................ 5.55% 6/1/07 12,260 12,490
Summit Pike Creek ..................... 5.55% 8/15/20 12,767 13,022
Summit Gateway ........................ 5.55% 7/1/07 6,900 7,100
Summit Stony Point .................... 5.55% 4/1/29 8,430 8,590
-------- --------
TOTAL TAX EXEMPT BONDS ............... 51,802 52,852
-------- --------
TOTAL VARIABLE RATE DEBT ............. 205,302 74,585
-------- --------
TOTAL OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS ....... $726,103 $474,673
======== ========
- ---------
(1) With the exception of the Mortgage Loan referred to in Note 2 below, which
has a $146.7 million balance at December 31, 1998, all the secured debt
can be prepaid at any time. Such Mortgage Loan can be prepaid after
February 15, 2001. Prepayment of all such secured debt is generally
subject to penalty or premium; however, the tax exempt mortgage notes can
be prepaid at any time without penalty or premium.
24
(2) Mortgage Loan secured by the following Communities:
Summit Glen Summit Blue Ash Summit Heron's Run
Summit St. Clair Summit Square Summit Perico
Summit Village Summit Waterford Summit Meadow
Summit Highland Summit Del Ray Summit Windsor I
Summit Norcroft I Summit Palm Lake Summit Windsor II
(3) Mortgage Loan secured by Summit Simsbury and Summit Touchstone Communities.
(4) The tax exempt bonds (the "Bonds") bear interest at various rates set by a
remarketing agent at the demand note index plus 0.50%, set weekly, or the
lowest percentage of prime which allows the resale at a price of par. The
Bonds are enhanced by letters of credit from a financial institution (the
"Credit Enhancements"), each of which Credit Enhancements will terminate
prior to the maturity dates of the related Bonds. In the event such Credit
Enhancements are not renewed or replaced upon termination, the related
loan obligations will be accelerated.
The LIBOR rate at December 31, 1998 was 5.63%.
The Operating Partnership's outstanding indebtedness (excluding the
Unsecured Credit Facility) had an average maturity of 8.1 years as of December
31, 1998. The aggregate maturities of all outstanding debt (excluding the
Unsecured Credit Facility) as of December 31, 1998 for each of the years ended
after December 31, 1998 are as follows (in thousands):
1999 ............... $ 6,205
2000 ............... 46,574
2001 ............... 36,803
2002 ............... 56,319
2003 ............... 37,586
Thereafter ......... 389,116
--------
Total .............. $572,603
========
Of the significant maturities in the above table, $15.0 million and $16.0
million relate to the unsecured bank notes that mature in 2000 and 2002,
respectively; $25 million relates to unsecured notes due in 2000; $30 million
relates to unsecured notes due in 2001 and $25 million relates to unsecured
notes due in 2002.
ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
On April 1, 1996, the Operating Partnership acquired its joint venture
partner's interest in Summit Plantation (formerly Plantation Cove), a 262
apartment community located in Plantation, Florida. The Operating Partnership
paid $6.4 million in cash for the remaining 75% interest in the joint venture.
During the year ended December 31, 1997, the Operating Partnership
completed the acquisition of five Communities: Summit Portofino, purchased on
January 6, 1997; Summit Mayfaire, purchased on January 15, 1997; Summit Sand
Lake purchased on February 20, 1997; Summit Windsor II, purchased on July 18,
1997; and Summit Fair Oaks, purchased on December 31, 1997 (the "1997
Acquisitions"). The 1997 Acquisitions added a total of 1,434 apartment homes to
the Operating Partnership's portfolio. Total purchase price for the 1997
Acquisitions was $104.5 million which consisted of $15.2 million in assumed
debt, 243,608 units (valued at $4.9 million) issued to Summit Properties in
exchange for Summit Properties issuing 243,608 shares of Common Stock to the
seller, 194,495 Units (valued at $3.9 million) issued to the seller and $78.9
million of cash. Concurrently with the purchase of Summit Portofino, Summit
Properties sold 315,029 shares of Common Stock to the public for cash. Summit
Properties contributed the proceeds of these sales of Common Stock to the
Operating Partnership in exchange for Units. The proceeds were then use to
25
fund a portion of the purchase. The Summit Windsor II purchase was partially
funded by the proceeds from the sale of a property formerly know as Summit
Charleston in May, 1997. The property formerly known as Summit Charleston was
sold for $9.5 million and a gain on the sale of approximately $4.4 million was
recognized.
The Operating Partnership completed the acquisition of three Communities
located in Atlanta, Georgia in 1998: Summit St. Clair, purchased effective
March 1, 1998; Summit Club at Dunwoody, purchased effective May 22, 1998; and
Summit at Lenox, purchased effective July 8, 1998 (the "Atlanta Acquisitions").
The Atlanta Acquisitions added a total of 1,092 apartment homes to the
Operating Partnership's portfolio at an aggregate purchase price of $88.3
million. The Atlanta Acquisitions were financed with the issuance of 259,871
Units (valued at $5.2 million) and the assumption of $8.8 million of mortgage
debt. The balance of the purchase price was paid in cash.
On May 18, 1998, the Operating Partnership sold a Community in Brandon,
Florida formerly known as Summit Providence for net proceeds of $23.9 million.
A gain on the sale of $8.7 million was recognized. Proceeds from the sale were
used to partially fund the acquisition of Summit Club at Dunwoody.
On October 23, 1998, the Operating Partnership sold a Community in Atlanta,
Georgia formerly known as Summit Springs for $17.5 million. The Operating
Partnership recognized a gain of approximately $6.0 million on the sale.
On November 2, 1998, the Operating Partnership sold a Community in Winston
Salem, North Carolina, formerly known as Summit Old Town, for $7.5 million. The
Operating Partnership recognized a gain of approximately $2.3 million from the
sale.
On November 4, 1998, the Operating Partnership acquired a portfolio of
multifamily properties in Texas (the "Ewing Portfolio") through a merger with
Ewing (as defined below), a private developer of luxury apartment homes. The
Ewing Portfolio consists of 2,465 apartment homes in seven Communities located
in Dallas, Austin and San Antonio. The acquisition of the Ewing Portfolio was
effected pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of October
31, 1998 (the "Merger Agreement") among Summit Properties, affiliates of Summit
Properties including the Operating Partnership, Ewing Industries, Inc., an Ohio
corporation ("Ewing Industries"), affiliates of Ewing, and their respective
partners, shareholders and members (together with Ewing Industries, "Ewing").
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the acquisition was funded through (i) the
issuance of 1,008,988 Units to Summit Properties in exchange for Summit
Properties issuing 1,008,988 shares of Common Stock to Ewing and 141,921 Units
issued to Ewing, valued at $20.7 million in the aggregate, (ii) the assumption
of $84.0 million in long-term fixed-rate mortgage indebtedness, (iii) the
payment of $50.6 million in cash and (iv) receipt of $3.8 million of credit for
customary prorations and reserves. A portion of the consideration was deferred
until stabilization of one Community (Summit Las Palmas) which was in lease-up
at the time of the acquisition of the Ewing Portfolio. The Summit Las Palmas
purchase was closed on December 31, 1998 with the additional consideration of
(i) 1,065,627 shares of Common Stock and 36,629 Units valued at $19.8 million in
aggregate and (ii) cash in the amount of approximately $600,000.
On December 16, 1998, the Operating Partnership (i) sold five communities
(the "Sold Communities") to Hollow Creek, LLC, a newly-formed North Carolina
limited liability company for approximately $68 million and (ii) contributed
two communities with an approximate fair market value of $22 million (together
with the Sold Communities, the "Joint Venture Communities") to Station Hill,
LLC., a newly-formed North Carolina limited liability company (the "LLC"). On
the same date, Hollow Creek, LLC contributed the Sold Communities to the LLC.
The LLC is a joint venture limited liability company, the membership of which
is comprised of the Operating Partnership and a wholly owned subsidiary of a
major financial services company (the "Joint Venture Member"). The disposition
was effected pursuant to a Real Estate Sale Agreement dated November 20, 1998
between the Operating Partnership and the Joint Venture Member and pursuant to
the Operating Agreement of the LLC, also dated November 20, 1998. The Operating
Partnership's net contribution to the LLC (approximately $5.6 million)
represents a 25 percent equity interest in the LLC. In addition, the Operating
Partnership is the managing member of the LLC and will also retain management
of the Joint Venture Communities through a management agreement with the LLC.
The cash flow of the LLC will be distributed pro rata to each member based on
its equity contribution until certain economic benchmarks are achieved, at
which point the Operating Partnership will receive an escalated portion of the
cash flow and residual interest. The LLC has obtained five separate mortgages
totaling $70,150,000 from Fannie Mae. These mortgages have a ten-year maturity
and a 6.70% interest rate. The proceeds of the mortgages were distributed on a
pro rata basis to the LLC's two members. The Joint Venture Communities involved
in the transaction were Summit Green, Summit Hollow I and II and Summit Creek
in Charlotte, North Carolina; Summit Hill I and II in Raleigh, North Carolina;
and Summit Station in Tampa, Florida. The Joint Venture Communities include a
total of 1,433 apartment homes. The Operating Partnership recognized a gain of
approximately $20.2 million on the disposition. The gain is net of a $5.6
million elimination of gain relative to the Operating Partnership's retained
portion of the joint venture. The elimination of the gain reduced the Operating
Partnership's investment in the joint venture to zero at the initial joint
venture formation.
26
Proceeds from the sale of Summit Springs, Summit Old Town and the Sold
Communities, were put in escrow with a qualified intermediary in accordance
with like-kind exchange income tax rules and regulations. These proceeds will
be used to fund future developments.
At December 31, 1998, the Operating Partnership had six apartment
Communities for sale with a net book value of approximately $52.5 million. The
Operating Partnership does not anticipate incurring a loss on any individual
apartment Community sale. Proceeds from the sale of the Communities will be
used to fund future development. The six apartment Communities held for sale
represented approximately 6% of property operating income for the Operating
Partnership for the year ended December 31, 1998.
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
The Operating Partnership's developments in progress at December 31, 1998
are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANTICIPATED
APARTMENT ESTIMATED COST TO COST TO CONSTRUCTION
COMMUNITY HOMES COSTS DATE COMPLETE COMPLETION
- ------------------------------------------------------ ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------
Summit Fair Lakes I -- Fairfax, VA (1) ............... 370 $ 32,900 $ 30,351 $ 2,549 Q1 1999
Summit Governor's Village -- Chapel Hill, NC (1) ..... 242 16,700 16,518 182 Q1 1999
Summit Doral -- Miami, Florida (1) ................... 260 22,800 16,601 6,199 Q2 1999
Summit Westwood -- Raleigh, NC (1) ................... 354 24,400 18,601 5,799 Q3 1999
Summit Lake II -- Raleigh, NC (1) .................... 144 10,200 7,012 3,188 Q2 1999
Summit Sedgebrook II -- Charlotte, NC ................ 120 7,800 4,409 3,391 Q3 1999
Summit Fair Lakes II -- Fairfax, VA .................. 160 14,200 8,017 6,183 Q3 1999
Summit Largo -- Largo, MD ............................ 217 18,000 4,984 13,016 Q1 2000
Summit Grandview -- Charlotte, NC .................... 266 45,500 3,703 41,797 Q2 2000
Other development and construction costs (2) ......... -- -- 26,949 --
--- -------- -------- -------
2,133 $192,500 $137,145 $82,304
===== ======== ======== =======
- ---------
(1) These Communities were in lease-up at December 31, 1998.
(2) Consists primarily of land held for development and other predevelopment
costs.
Estimated cost to complete the development Communities represents
substantially all of the Operating Partnership's material commitments for
capital expenditures at December 31, 1998.
CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING THE PERFORMANCE OF DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITIES
The Operating Partnership is optimistic about the operating prospects of
the Communities under construction even with the increased supply of newly
constructed apartment homes of comparable quality in many of its markets. As
with any development Community, there are uncertainties and risks associated
with the development of the Communities described above. While the Operating
Partnership has prepared development budgets and has estimated completion and
stabilization target dates based on what it believes are reasonable assumptions
in light of current conditions, there can be no assurance that actual costs
will not exceed current budgets or that the Operating Partnership will not
experience construction delays due to the unavailability of materials, weather
conditions or other events.
Other development risks include the possibility of incurring additional
cost or liability resulting from defects in construction material and the
possibility that financing may not be available on favorable terms, or at all,
to pursue or complete development activities. Similarly, market conditions at
the time these Communities become available for leasing will affect the rental
rates that may be charged and the period of time necessary to achieve
stabilization, which could make one or more of the development Communities
unprofitable or result in achieving stabilization later than currently
anticipated. In addition, the Operating Partnership is conducting feasibility
and other pre-development work for twelve potential Communities. The Operating
Partnership could abandon the development of any one or more of these potential
Communities in the event that it determines that market conditions do not
support development, financing is not available on favorable terms or other
circumstances prevent development. Similarly, there can be no assurance that if
the Operating Partnership does pursue one or more of these potential
Communities that it will be able to complete construction within the currently
estimated development budgets or that construction can be started at the time
currently anticipated.
27
INFLATION
Substantially all of the leases at the Communities are for a term of one
year or less, which coupled with the relatively high occupancy rates, may
enable the Operating Partnership to seek increased rents upon renewal of
existing leases or commencement of new leases. The short-term nature of these
leases generally serves to reduce the risk to the Operating Partnership of the
adverse effect of inflation.
YEAR 2000
YEAR 2000 INFORMATION AND READINESS DISCLOSURE ACT
The Operating Partnership supports the exchange of information relating to
the Year 2000 issue and designates the following information as the Year 2000
Readiness Disclosure within the meaning of the Year 2000 Information and
Readiness Disclosure Act. Information set forth herein regarding the Year 2000
compliance of non-Operating Partnership products and services are
"republications" under the Year 2000 Information and Readiness Disclosure Act
and are based on information supplied by other companies about the products and
services they offer. The Operating Partnership has not independently verified
the contents of these republications and takes no responsibility for the
accuracy or completeness of information contained in such republications.
INTRODUCTION
The Securities and Exchange Commission has asked all public companies to
provide disclosure regarding their Year 2000 readiness. The term "Year 2000
issue" is a general term used to describe various problems that may result from
the improper processing by computer systems of dates after 1999. These problems
arise from the inability of some hardware and software to distinguish dates
before the year 2000 from dates in and after the year 2000. This could result
in a system failure or miscalculations causing disruptions of operations. The
Year 2000 issue affects virtually all companies and all organizations.
The Operating Partnership's efforts to address its Year 2000 issues are
focused in the following three areas: (i) reviewing and taking any necessary
steps to attempt to correct the Operating Partnership's computer information
systems (i.e., software applications and hardware platforms), (ii) evaluating
and making any necessary modifications to other computer systems that do not
relate to information technology but include embedded technology, such as
telecommunications, security, HVAC, elevator, fire and safety systems, and
(iii) communicating with certain significant third-party service providers to
determine whether there will be any interruption in their systems that could
affect the Operating Partnership.
THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S STATE OF READINESS
The Operating Partnership has developed a four phase plan to address its
Year 2000 issues (its "Year 2000 Plan"). The four phases are (i) Awareness,
(ii) Assessment, (iii) Remediation and Implementation and (iv) Testing.
AWARENESS
The Operating Partnership has made the relevant employees, including its
property managers, aware of the Year 2000 issue and collected information from
such employees regarding systems that the Operating Partnership anticipates may
be affected. Management will oversee the Operating Partnership's progress with
respect to the implementation of its Year 2000 Plan. In addition, the Year 2000
Plan will be subject to review of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
of Summit Properties.
ASSESSMENT
The Operating Partnership has substantially completed an assessment of its
standard computer information systems and is now taking the further necessary
steps to make its core computer information systems, in those situations in
which the Operating Partnership is required to do so, Year 2000 compliant. See
"Remediation and Implementation" below. The Operating Partnership is in the
process of attempting to obtain written verification from vendors to the effect
that the Operating Partnership's other (i.e., non-core) standard computer
information systems acquired from such vendors correctly distinguish dates
before the year 2000 from dates in and after the year 2000. The Operating
Partnership expects that it will receive such verifications, or a commitment
from the relevant vendors to provide a solution, by no later than April 30,
1999.
In addition, the Operating Partnership is currently evaluating and
assessing its other computer systems that do not relate to information
technology but include embedded technology, such as telecommunications,
security, HVAC, elevator, fire and safety systems, and expects that its
assessment will be completed by the second quarter of 1999. The Operating
Partnership
28
is aware that such systems contain embedded chips that are difficult to
identify and test and may require complete replacement because they cannot be
repaired. Failure of the Operating Partnership to identify or remediate any
embedded chips (either on an individual or aggregate basis) on which
significant business operations depend, such as phone systems, could have a
material adverse impact on the Operating Partnership's business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The Operating Partnership rents apartments in its Communities to
individuals and does not have a single customer or group of customers who rents
a significant number of apartments. The Operating Partnership's primary
purchases are building-related products (e.g., carpets, paint and blinds) and
services (e.g., lawn care services), all of which are available from numerous
suppliers. The Operating Partnership's primary financial service providers are
its primary bank and payroll processor. The primary bank has provided written
verification to the Operating Partnership that it will be Year 2000 compliant.
The Operating Partnership implemented the payroll processor Year 2000 upgrade
in the fourth quarter of 1998. For the foregoing reasons, the Operating
Partnership does not believe that there is a significant risk related to the
failure of residents, vendors or third-party goods or service providers to
prepare for the Year 2000; however, the costs and timing of third-party Year
2000 compliance is not within the Operating Partnership's control and no
assurances can be given with respect to the cost or timing of such efforts or
the potential effects of any failure to comply.
REMEDIATION AND IMPLEMENTATION
The Operating Partnership's primary uses of software systems are its
corporate accounting and property management software. The Operating
Partnership's corporate accounting system is widely used in the real estate
industry. A version upgrade, installed in the second quarter of 1998, is
designed to be Year 2000 compliant. The Operating Partnership completed the
replacement of its current property management software in October 1998 with a
new software system that is also designed to be Year 2000 compliant. This new
software is also widely used in the real estate industry. The Operating
Partnership has received written verification from the vendors of each of the
corporate accounting and management systems that the relevant software is Year
2000 compliant. The Operating Partnership had previously planned both the
upgrade of the corporate accounting system and implementation of the new
property management system, and such changes would have been undertaken without
regard to Year 2000 remediation issues. Accordingly, the Operating Partnership
has not deferred any planned information or software projects due to such Year
2000 projects, and the Operating Partnership is not treating the costs of the
above-referenced changes as Year 2000-related expenses.
TESTING
To attempt to confirm that its computer systems are Year 2000 compliant,
the Operating Partnership expects to perform limited testing of its computer
information systems and its other computer systems that do not relate to
information technology but include embedded technology; however, unless Year
2000 issues arise in the course of its limited testing, the Operating
Partnership will rely on the written verification received from each vendor of
its computer systems that the relevant system is Year 2000 compliant.
Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the computer systems on which the
Operating Partnership's business relies will correctly distinguish dates before
the year 2000 from dates in and after the year 2000. Any such failures could
have a material adverse effect on the Operating Partnership's business,
financial condition and results of operations. The Operating Partnership began
testing in the fourth quarter of 1998 and expects that its testing will be
complete by March 31, 1999.
COSTS TO ADDRESS THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S YEAR 2000 ISSUES
Based on current information from its review to date, the Operating
Partnership budgeted $500,000 for the cost of repairing, updating and replacing
its standard computer information systems. Because the Operating Partnership's
Year 2000 assessment is ongoing and additional funds may be required as a
result of future findings, the Operating Partnership's current budget amounts
may increase as a result of unanticipated delays or preparedness issues. While
the Operating Partnership's efforts to address its Year 2000 issues will
involve additional costs, the Operating Partnership believes, based on
available information, that these costs will not have a material adverse effect
on its business, financial condition or results of operations. The Operating
Partnership expects to fund the costs of addressing the Year 2000 issue from
cash flows resulting from operations. While the Operating Partnership believes
that it will be Year 2000 compliant by December 31, 1999, if these efforts are
not completed on time, or if the costs associated with updating or replacing
the Operating Partnership's computer systems exceeds the Operating
Partnership's estimates, the Year 2000 issue could have a material adverse
effect on the Operating Partnership's business, financial condition and results
of operations.
29
RISKS PRESENTED BY YEAR 2000 ISSUES
The Operating Partnership is still in the process of evaluating potential
disruptions or complications that might result from Year 2000-related problems;
however, at this time the Operating Partnership has not identified any specific
business functions that are likely to suffer material disruption as a result of
Year-2000 related events. It is possible, however, that the Operating
Partnership may identify business functions in the future that are specifically
at risk of Year 2000 disruption. The absence of any such determination as of
the date of this report represents only the Operating Partnership's current
status of evaluating potential Year-2000 related problems and facts presently
known to the Operating Partnership, and should not be construed to mean that
there is no risk of Year-2000 related disruption. Moreover, due to the unique
and pervasive nature of the Year 2000 issue, it is not possible to anticipate
each of the wide variety of Year 2000 events, particularly outside of the
Operating Partnership, that might arise in a worst case scenario which might
have a material adverse impact on the Operating Partnership's business,
financial condition and results of operations.
THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S CONTINGENCY PLANS
The Operating Partnership intends to develop contingency plans for
significant business risks identified by the Operating Partnership that might
result from Year-2000 related events. Because the Operating Partnership has not
yet identified any specific business function that will be materially at risk
of significant Year-2000 related disruptions, and because a full assessment of
the Operating Partnership's risk from potential Year 2000 failures is still in
process, the Operating Partnership has not yet developed detailed contingency
plans specific to Year 2000 problems. In the event that the Operating
Partnership concludes that one or more contingency plans are required,
development of such contingency plans is currently scheduled to occur no later
than June 30, 1999 or as otherwise appropriate.
FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
The White Paper on Funds from Operations approved by the Board of
Governors of NAREIT in March 1995 defines Funds from Operations as net income
(loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from
debt restructuring and sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation
and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and
joint ventures. The Operating Partnership computes Funds from Operations in
accordance with the standards established by the White Paper, which may differ
from the methodology for calculating Funds from Operations utilized by other
equity REITs, and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs.
Funds Available for Distribution is defined as Funds from Operations less
capital expenditures funded by operations (recurring capital expenditures). The
Operating Partnership's methodology for calculating Funds Available for
Distribution may differ from the methodology for calculating Funds Available
for Distribution utilized by other REITs, and accordingly, may not be
comparable to other REITs. Funds from Operations and Funds Available for
Distribution do not represent amounts available for management's discretionary
use because of needed capital expenditures or expansion, debt service
obligations, property acquisitions, development, dividends and distributions or
other commitments and uncertainties. Funds from Operations and Funds Available
for Distribution should not be considered as alternatives to net income
(determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of the Operating
Partnership's financial performance or to cash flows from operating activities
(determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of the Operating
Partnership's liquidity, nor are they indicative of funds available to fund the
Operating Partnership's cash needs, including its ability to make
dividends/distributions. The Operating Partnership believes Funds from
Operations and Funds Available for Distribution are helpful to investors as
measures of the performance of the Operating Partnership because, along with
cash flows from operating activities, financing activities and investing
activities, they provide investors with an understanding of the ability of the
Operating Partnership to incur and service debt and make capital expenditures.
30
Funds from Operations and Funds Available for Distribution are calculated as
follows (dollars in thousands):
YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31,
-------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------------- -------------- -------------
Net income ................................................... $ 65,881 $ 31,934 $ 20,561
Extraordinary items .......................................... 594 -- 626
Net gain on sale of assets ................................... (37,148) (4,366) --
---------- ---------- -----------
Adjusted net income ......................................... 29,327 27,568 21,187
Depreciation:
Real estate assets .......................................... 28,890 22,633 18,171
Real estate joint venture ................................... 25 -- 33
---------- ---------- -----------
Funds from Operations ........................................ 58,242 50,201 39,391
Recurring capital expenditures (1) .......................... (4,607) (4,586) (3,291)
---------- ---------- -----------
Funds Available for Distribution ............................. $ 53,635 $ 45,615 $ 36,100
========== ========== ===========
Non-recurring capital expenditures (2) ....................... ($ 4,995) ($ 4,653) $ 2,973
========== ========== ===========
Cash Flow Provided By (Used In):
Operating Activities ........................................ $ 63,808 $ 55,947 $ 41,176
Investing Activities ........................................ (219,170) (175,907) (103,971)
Financing Activities ........................................ 154,636 119,858 63,579
Weighted average units outstanding -- basic .................. 29,140,931 27,257,637 22,914,068
========== ========== ===========
Weighted average units outstanding -- diluted ................ 29,150,315 27,294,058 22,940,998
========== ========== ===========
- ---------
(1) Recurring capital expenditures are expected to be funded from operations
and consist primarily of exterior painting, new appliances, vinyl, blinds,
tile, and wallpaper. In contrast, non-recurring capital expenditures, such
as major improvements, water submetering, new garages and access gates,
are expected to be funded by financing activities and are therefore not
included in the calculation of Funds Available for Distribution.
(2) Non-recurring capital expenditures include major renovations in the amount
of $1.3 million in 1998 and $3.5 million in 1997; $1 million and $81,000
for water meters in 1998 and 1997, respectively; $25,000 and $83,000 for
new signage in 1998 and 1997, respectively; $561,000 and $239,000 for
fitness centers, key controls and other revenue enhancement items in 1998
and 1997, respectively; $446,000 and $252,000 for access gates and
security fences in 1998 and 1997, respectively; $215,189 and $21,000 for
washer/dryer units in 1998 and 1997, respectively; and $776,000 and
$238,000 for improvement at properties acquired or disposed of in 1998 and
1997, respectively. In addition, 1998 and 1997 included $142,000 and
$250,000, respectively, of capital expenditures for construction of
garages and $191,000 for improvements at Summit Norcroft I done in
conjunction with development of Summit Norcroft II in 1998.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
See "Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations -- Market Risk".
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Financial statements and supplementary data are contained on the pages
indicated on the Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on page
50 of this Report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
31
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF REGISTRANT
The Operating Partnership is managed by Summit Properties, in its capacity
as the general partner of the Operating Partnership. Consequently, the
Operating Partnership has no directors or executive officers. This Item 10
reflects information with respect to the directors and executive officers of
Summit Properties.
DIRECTORS
WILLIAM F. PAULSEN. Mr. Paulsen is the Chief Executive Officer and a
director of Summit Properties. He has held this position since 1994. Prior to
the formation of Summit Properties, Mr. Paulsen was a senior partner and the
Chief Executive Officer of the predecessor to Summit Properties and a general
partner of each of the partnerships which transferred Communities to the
Operating Partnership when it was formed. Mr. Paulsen joined the predecessor to
Summit Properties in 1981. He was selected as North Carolina Entrepreneur of
the Year in 1990. In addition to his responsibilities with Summit Properties,
Mr. Paulsen is a full Member and Residential Council Member of the Urban Land
Institute. He is a Member of the Board of Directors of The Beach Company, a
real estate investment company specializing primarily in commercial and resort
development in the southeastern United States and is a trustee of The Asheville
School. Mr. Paulsen also served as a Vice President of the Charlotte Apartment
Association. He is 52 years old.
WILLIAM B. MCGUIRE, JR. Mr. McGuire has served as the Chairman of the
Board of Summit Properties since 1994. Prior to the formation of Summit
Properties, Mr. McGuire served as a senior partner of the predecessor to Summit
Properties and as a general partner of each of the partnerships which
transferred multifamily apartment communities to the Operating Partnership when
it was formed. Mr. McGuire founded the predecessor to Summit Properties in
1972. Mr. McGuire also founded McGuire Properties, Inc., a real estate
brokerage firm, in 1972. He has been active in the following professional and
community organizations: Residential, Multifamily and Urban Development Mixed
Use Councils of the Urban Land Institute; Charlotte Advisory Board of
NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A.; and The Charlotte City Club, serving on
its Board of Governors as President. He was a Trustee of the North Carolina
Nature Conservancy; a Founder and Director of Habitat for Humanity of
Charlotte; and the Founder and President of The Neighborhood Medical Clinic.
Mr. McGuire is 54 years old.
STEVEN R. LEBLANC. Mr. LeBlanc is the President, Chief Operating Officer
and a director of Summit Properties. Prior to joining Summit Properties, Mr.
LeBlanc served as President of Urban Growth Trust from 1987 to 1988 where he
developed the company's strategic business plan, orchestrated the transition to
REIT status and initiated over $200 million in acquisitions and developments.
From 1992 to 1997, Mr. LeBlanc served in a number of senior management
positions with the Security Capital Group where he implemented a fully
integrated operating company strategy focused on long-term sustainable cash
flow growth. While at these companies he was responsible for the acquisition
and development of 11,000 apartment homes and the purchase of land for
additional 10,000 apartment homes. From 1984 to 1992, Mr. LeBlanc was a partner
with Lincoln Property Company where he was a member of the senior management
team and was responsible for the management of 17,000 apartments as well as the
firm's acquisition and development activities throughout Texas and the
Northeast. Mr. LeBlanc is a member of the Board of Directors of the National
Multifamily Council and a member of the Urban Land Institute. He has served on
the Boards of Directors of the Rio Grand School, the Santa Fe Pro-Musica and
the Austin Apartment Association. Mr. LeBlanc has taught various real estate
courses at Austin Community College in Austin, Texas. Mr. LeBlanc is 41 years
old.
NELSON SCHWAB III. Mr. Schwab has been a director of Summit Properties
since 1994. He has been a Managing Director of Carousel Capital, a merchant
banking firm based in Charlotte, North Carolina specializing in middle market
acquisitions since 1996. Mr. Schwab served as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Paramount Parks from 1992 to 1995. Mr. Schwab is a Member of the
Board of Directors of First Union National Bank, Silver Dollar City, Inc.,
Griffin Corporation, MJD Communications Inc., Critical Care Concepts, Simpson
Performance Products and Burlington Industries. Mr. Schwab previously served as
the Chairman of the Carolinas Partnership and the Charlotte Chamber of
Commerce. Mr. Schwab is 54 years old.
JOHN CROSLAND, JR. Mr. Crosland has been a director of Summit Properties
since 1995; however, Mr. Crosland has declined to be nominated for re-election
as a director and his term will expire at Summit Properties' Annual Meeting on
May 11, 1999. He has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Crosland
Group, Inc., a fully diversified real estate development company, since 1971.
Mr. Crosland is a member of the Board of Directors of First Union National
Bank, Turnberry Homes and Crosland Patton Smith. He has been active in the
home-building industry holding office at local, state and national levels. From
1977 to 1989 he served as Chairman of the North Carolina Housing Finance
Agency. Among his
32
diverse civic involvement, Mr. Crosland was a founder and first Chairman of
Charlotte's Habitat for Humanity; currently serves on the Habitat for Humanity
International Affiliates Advisory Committee; was 1996 Chairman of the Davidson
College Board of Visitors and is a member of the Davidson Board of Trustees.
Mr. Crosland was honored by the home building industry by being named 1985
Builder of the Year by PROFESSIONAL BUILDER MAGAZINE and has been inducted into
both the National and North Carolina Housing Halls of Fame. Mr. Crosland is 70
years old.
JAMES H. HANCE, JR. Mr. Hance has been a director of the Summit Properties
since 1994. Mr. Hance is vice chairman and chief financial officer of Bank of
America and is a member of such corporation's Policy Committee. He is also
responsible for the Finance Group, comprising the finance, accounting and
control functions, and for Treasury, including balance sheet management.
Additionally, he also is responsible for Technology & Operations, which
encompasses such corporation's operations and technology development functions;
Investor Relations; the Legal department, and Management Services, which
provides for such corporation's real estate needs. The global payment business,
which provides depository and treasury services to customers worldwide, also
reports to Mr. Hance. Mr. Hance, a certified public accountant, spent 17 years
with the Price Waterhouse accounting firm in Philadelphia and Charlotte. For
six years, he was a partner in the Charlotte office and served as the audit
partner responsible for the firm's relationship with NCNB Corporation
(predecessor to NationsBank and Bank of America). From August 1985 until
December 1986, he was chairman and co-owner of Consolidation Coin Caterers
Corp. in Charlotte. He joined NationsBank (predecessor to Bank of America) in
March 1987. Mr. Hance is chairman of the board of trustees of Novant Health
Services and is vice chairman of the board of trustees of Charlotte Country Day
School. He also is a member of the board of directors of Caraustar Industries
Inc., Family Dollar Stores Inc. and Lance Inc. Mr. Hance is a trustee of
Washington University in St. Louis and is a member of Washington University's
National Council for the John M. Olin School of Business. He is a member of the
board of visitors of Duke University Fuqua School of Business, serves on the
board of trustees of the North Carolina Blumenthal Performing Arts Center, and
the board of directors of the Foundation for the Carolinas. In addition, he is
the 1996 past chairman of the Charlotte Chamber of Commerce and a 1998
International Business Fellow. Mr. Hance is 54 years old.
HENRY H. FISHKIND. Dr. Fishkind has been a director of Summit Properties
since 1994. He is the President of Fishkind & Associates, Inc., a private
economic and financial consulting firm based in Orlando, Florida that he
founded in 1987. Dr. Fishkind is a member of the Board of Directors of Engle
Homes. Dr. Fishkind served on the Florida Governor's Economic Advisory Board
from 1979 to 1981. He is 49 years old.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT DIRECTORS
MICHAEL L. SCHWARZ. Mr. Schwarz is an Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Summit Properties. Prior to joining Summit Properties in
1994, Mr. Schwarz was a co-founder and spent five years as the Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Industrial Developments International,
Inc., a developer of industrial real estate. He is a certified public
accountant. Mr. Schwarz served as the Chairman of the Board of The Study Hall
of Emmaus House, a non-profit educational facility serving inner-city youths
and is active in Junior Achievement, Inc. Mr. Schwarz is 38 years old.
WILLIAM B. HAMILTON. Mr. Hamilton is an Executive Vice President of Summit
Properties. Prior to joining Summit Properties in December of 1996, Mr.
Hamilton spent one year as a Senior Vice President with Insignia Management
Group in Atlanta, Georgia where he was responsible for property and asset
management for 50,000 multifamily apartments. For the four years immediately
prior thereto, Mr. Hamilton was the President of NPI Property Management
Corporation, where his management portfolio consisted of 31,000 multifamily
apartments. Mr. Hamilton's experience in the property and asset management
field for multifamily apartments has spanned more than 20 years. Mr. Hamilton
has been designated a certified property manager by the Institute of Real
Estate Management and a Certified Apartment Supervisor by the National
Apartment Association. Mr. Hamilton is 50 years old.
RAYMOND V. JONES. Mr. Jones served as Executive Vice President/Development
and Construction of Summit Properties since 1994; however, he terminated his
employment with Summit Properties on May 1, 1998.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended (the "Exchange
Act") requires Summit Properties' executive officers and directors, and persons
who are beneficial owners of more than 10% of a registered class of Summit
Properties' equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Officers,
directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC
regulations to furnish Summit Properties with copies of all Section 16(a) forms
they file.
33
To Summit Properties' knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of
such reports furnished to Summit Properties, the executive officers, directors
and greater than 10% beneficial owners, all Section 16(a) filing requirements
were satisfied, except that: (i) each of Messrs. McGuire and Paulsen
inadvertently filed a Form 4 one month late, (ii) Mr. Hamilton inadvertently
failed to report on Form 4 one sale of shares of Common Stock and (iii) Mr.
Schwarz inadvertently failed to report on Form 4 two acquisitions of shares of
Common Stock. Each of the above transactions was subsequently reported.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Operating Partnership is managed by Summit Properties, in its capacity
as the general partner of the Operating Partnership. Consequently, the
Operating Partnership has no directors or executive officers and pays no
compensation. The information provided in this Item 11 reflects compensation
paid to the Directors and executive officers of Summit Properties.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Directors of Summit Properties who are also employees receive no
additional compensation for their services as directors. Non-employee directors
of Summit Properties (the "Independent Directors") received an annual
director's fee of $12,000 in 1998. Each Independent Director also receives
$1,000 for each regular meeting of the Board of Directors attended, $1,000 for
each special meeting of the Board of Directors attended, $250 for each
committee meeting attended if held concurrently with a Board of Directors
regular or special meeting and $500 for each committee meeting attended if not
held concurrently with a Board of Directors regular or special meeting. Under
the 1994 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "1994 Stock Plan"), following
each annual meeting of stockholders, each Independent Director also receives a
non-qualified option to purchase 2,000 shares of Common Stock at a price equal
to the market price of the Common Stock on the date of grant.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE. The following table sets forth the cash and
non-cash compensation awarded to the Chief Executive Officer, the three other
most highly compensated executive officers of Summit Properties who were
serving as executive officers at the end of 1998 and an additional individual
who held an executive officer position during 1998 but who was not serving as
an executive officer following 1998, each of whose compensation exceeded
$100,000 during the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (collectively the
"Named Executive Officers").
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION AWARDS
-----------------------------------------
ANNUAL LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION RESTRICTED SECURITIES INCENTIVE
------------------- STOCK UNDERLYING PLAN ALL OTHER
SALARY BONUS AWARDS OPTIONS ("LTIP") COMPENSATION
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR ($) (1) $ $ (#) PAYOUTS ($) ($) (2)
- ------------------------------------------- ------ --------- --------- --------------- ------------ ------------ -------------
William F. Paulsen ........................ 1998 252,370 126,185 68,013(3) 0 -- 5,000
Chief Executive Officer 1997 244,500 122,250 24,443(3) 0 -- 4,750
1996 232,875 0 228,150(3) 0 -- 4,750
Steven R. LeBlanc(4) ...................... 1998 113,462 96,250 0 175,000 -- 0
President and Chief Operating Officer
Michael L. Schwarz ........................ 1998 178,725 138,959 0 0 -- 5,000
Executive Vice President and 1997 173,000 86,500 196,775(5) 0 -- 4,750
Chief Financial Officer 1996 155,250 38,812 0 0 -- 4,750
William B. Hamilton(6) .................... 1998 178,725 54,064 0 0 -- 5,000
Executive Vice President and 1997 173,000 43,250 179,375(7) 0 -- 0
President of Summit Management 1996 13,308 0 0 0 -- 0
Company
Raymond V. Jones .......................... 1998 58,730 112,500 0 0 -- 4,750
Former Executive Vice President/ 1997 173,000 86,000 0 0 -- 4,750
Development and Construction 1996 165,000 60,000 152,100(8) 0 -- 4,620
34
- ---------
(1) Includes amounts deferred under the Summit Properties' 401(k) plan. Under
the plan, employees generally are permitted to invest up to 17% of their
salary on a pre-tax basis, subject to a statutory maximum.
(2) Amounts represent matching contributions made by the Summit Properties to
the Named Executive Officer's account under the Company's 401(k) plan.
(3) Pursuant to a Summit Properties policy which requires any cash bonus earned
in excess of 50% of base salary to be paid in the form of Common Stock,
Mr. Paulsen received an (a) award of 4,122 shares of restricted stock on
January 13, 1999 under the 1994 Stock Plan that vests in two equal annual
installments beginning in January 2000 (the value of vested and unvested
shares of such restricted stock as of December 31, 1998 was $71,104.50)
and (b) award of 1,157 shares of restricted stock on January 1, 1998 under
the 1994 Stock Plan that vests in two equal annual installments beginning
in January 1999 (the value of vested and unvested shares of such
restricted stock as of December 31, 1998 was $19,958.25). Moreover, Mr.
Paulsen received an award of 11,700 shares of restricted stock on January
12, 1996 under the 1994 Stock Plan that vests in five equal annual
installments beginning in January 1996. The value of vested and unvested
shares of such restricted stock as of December 31, 1998 was $201,825.00.
Dividends will be paid on the shares of restricted stock.
(4) Mr. LeBlanc began employment on July 1, 1998.
(5) Mr. Schwarz received an award of 7,908 shares of restricted stock on
January 2, 1997 under the 1994 Stock Plan that vests in four equal annual
installments beginning in January 1998. The value of vested and unvested
shares of such restricted stock as of December 31, 1998 was $136,413.
Pursuant to a Summit Properties policy which requires any cash bonus
earned in excess of 50% of base salary to be paid in the form of Common
Stock, Mr.Schwarz received an award of 1,126 shares of restricted stock on
January 1, 1998 under the 1994 Stock Plan that vests in two equal annual
installments beginning in January 1999. The value of vested and unvested
shares of such restricted stock as of December 31, 1998 was $19,423.50.
Dividends will be paid on the shares of restricted stock.
(6) Mr. Hamilton began employment on December 5, 1996.
(7) Mr. Hamilton received an award of 8,200 shares of restricted stock on
January 2, 1997 under the 1994 Stock Plan that vests in four equal annual
installments beginning in January 1998. The value of vested and unvested
shares of such restricted stock as of December 31, 1998 was $141,450.00.
Dividends will be paid on the shares of restricted stock.
(8) Mr. Jones received an award of 7,800 shares of restricted stock on January
12, 1996 under the 1994 Stock Plan that provided for vesting in five equal
annual installments beginning in January 1996. Mr. Jones terminated his
employment with the Summit Properties on May 1, 1998. Accordingly, the
value of vested and unvested shares of his restricted stock as of December
31, 1998 was zero.
OPTION GRANTS IN FISCAL YEAR 1998. The following table sets forth the
options granted with respect to the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 to the
Named Executive Officers.
OPTIONS GRANTED IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
POTENTIAL REALIZABLE
VALUE AT ASSUMED
ANNUAL RATES OF
STOCK PRICE
APPRECIATION
INDIVIDUAL GRANTS FOR OPTION TERM
----------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
PERCENT OF
TOTAL
NUMBER OF OPTIONS
SECURITIES GRANTED TO
UNDERLYING EMPLOYEES EXERCISE OF
OPTIONS IN FISCAL BASE PRICE EXPIRATION
NAME GRANTED (#) YEAR ($/SH) DATE 5% ($) 10% ($)
- ----------------------------- ---------------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ----------
William F. Paulsen .......... 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Steven R. LeBlanc ........... 175,000(1) 100 $ 19.125 7/1/08 2,104,832 5,334,057
Michael Schwarz ............. 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
William B. Hamilton ......... 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Raymond V. Jones ............ 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
- ---------
(1) These options, of which 150,000 are non-qualified options and 25,000 are
incentive stock options, vest in five equal annual installments beginning
on July 1, 1998, the date of grant of such options.
35
OPTION EXERCISES AND YEAR-END HOLDINGS. The following table sets forth the
aggregated number of options to purchase shares of Common Stock exercised in
1998 and the value of options to purchase shares of Common Stock held on
December 31, 1998 by the Named Executive Officers.
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN FISCAL YEAR 1998 AND
FISCAL YEAR-END 1998 OPTION VALUES
VALUE OF
NUMBER OF SECURITIES UNEXERCISED
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED IN-THE-MONEY
SHARES OPTIONS AT FISCAL OPTIONS AT FISCAL
ACQUIRED ON YEAR-END(#) YEAR-END($) (1)
EXERCISE VALUE EXERCISABLE/ EXERCISABLE/
NAME (#) REALIZED($) UNEXERCISABLE UNEXERCISABLE
- ----------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------------------ ------------------
William F. Paulsen .......... 0 0 40,000/0 0/0
Steven R. LeBlanc ........... 0 0 35,000/140,000 0/0
Michael L. Schwarz .......... 0 0 45,000/12,000 2,160/1,440
William B. Hamilton ......... 0 0 0/0 0/0
Raymond V. Jones ............ 18,000 0 0/0 0/0
- ---------
(1) Based on a closing price of $17.25 per share of Common Stock on December
31, 1998, the last 1998 trading day for the Common Stock.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS. The following table sets forth each award made
to the Named Executive Officers in the last completed fiscal year under any
LTIP.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANS -- AWARDS
IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
NUMBER OF
SHARES PERFORMANCE OR
UNITS OR OTHER PERIOD UNTIL
OTHER RIGHTS MATURATION OR
NAME (#) PAYOUT
- ----------------------------- -------------- -------------------
William F. Paulsen .......... 11,600 January 2, 2001
Steven R. LeBlanc ........... 11,500 January 2, 2001
Michael L. Schwarz .......... 8,350 January 2, 2001
William B. Hamilton ......... 8,350 January 2, 2001
Raymond V. Jones ............ 0 N/A
This table identifies the target number of performance shares of Common
Stock ("Performance Shares"), if any, which is the subject of a Performance
Stock Award Agreement (the "Performance Stock Agreement") dated January 2, 1998
(with the exception of Mr. LeBlanc, whose Performance Stock Agreement is dated
July 2, 1998 and Mr. Jones, who terminated his employment with Summit
Properties on May 1, 1998) issued under the 1994 Stock Plan to each Named
Executive Officer. Pursuant to the Performance Stock Agreement, an executive
officer has the opportunity to earn up to 225% of the target amount of
Performance Shares; however, the executive officer has no right to vote,
receive dividends or transfer the Performance Shares until shares of Common
Stock are issued. The number of shares of Common Stock that the executive
officer receives on the third anniversary of the date of the Performance Stock
Agreement will be calculated based upon the following schedule and are subject
to vesting (as described below):
If the Summit Properties' Average Annual Return (share
appreciation and distributions) from the date of the
award to the third anniversary is: .................. 0-11% 11% 12% 13% 14% 15%
The executive will receive shares of Common Stock
equal to the target number of Performance Shares
times the following payment percentage: ............. 0% 50% 100% 125% 155% 225%
Under the Performance Stock Agreement, fifty percent of the shares of
Common Stock to which an executive officer may be entitled will vest on the
third anniversary of the date of the Performance Stock Agreement; 25% will vest
on the fourth anniversary and the remaining 25% will vest on the fifth
anniversary. The executive officer's rights to any shares of
36
Common Stock to which such executive may be entitled will also fully vest upon
the employee's death, disability or upon a change of control.
The stated price of the Common Stock on January 2, 1998 (for purposes of
calculating share price appreciation for each Named Executive Officer except
Mr. LeBlanc) was $21.375 per share. Assuming that dividend increases in fiscal
years 1999 and 2000 follow Summit Properties' historical dividend increases of
$.04 per year, the per share price of the Common Stock on January 2, 2001 would
have to be $23.42, $24.06, $24.70, $25.34 or $25.98 to achieve the average
annual total return thresholds of 11%, 12%, 13%, 14% or 15%, respectively. If
the 11%, 12%, 13%, 14% or 15% threshold is met 14,150; 28,300; 35,375; 43,865
or 63,675 shares of Common Stock would be allocated among the Named Executive
Officers (except for Mr. LeBlanc and Mr. Jones), subject to vesting.
The stated price of the Common Stock on May 12, 1998 (for purposes of
calculating share price appreciation for Mr. LeBlanc) was $19.87 per share.
Assuming that dividend increases in fiscal years 1999 and 2000 follow the
Summit Properties' historical dividend increases of $.04 per year, the per
share price of the Common Stock on January 2, 2001 would have to be $20.56,
$21.07, $21.59, $22.11 or $22.62 to achieve the average annual total return
thresholds of 11%, 12%, 13%, 14% or 15%, respectively. If the 11%, 12%, 13%,
14% or 15% threshold is met 5,750; 11,500; 14,375; 17,825 or 25,875 shares of
Common Stock would be awarded to Mr. LeBlanc, subject to vesting.
EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENTS
Summit Properties has entered into employment agreements (the "Employment
Agreements") with each of Messrs. Paulsen, LeBlanc, Jones, Schwarz and
Hamilton. The Agreement with Mr. Paulsen expired on February 15, 1999 and
Summit Properties entered into a new Employment Agreement with him. The
Agreement with Mr. LeBlanc has an original term up to July 1, 2001. The
Agreement with Mr. Jones expired upon his termination of employment with Summit
Properties on May 1, 1998. The Employment Agreement with Mr. Schwarz had an
original term through February 16, 1996, and has been automatically extended
until such time as terminated pursuant to its terms. Mr. Hamilton's Employment
Agreement provided for an original term through December 5, 1998 and has been
automatically extended pursuant to its terms. The Employment Agreements provide
that the officers will be paid the base salaries set forth next to their names
in the Summary Compensation Table above, which amounts may be increased or
decreased (subject to certain limitations) at the Compensation Committee's
discretion, plus any other amounts the Compensation Committee, in its
discretion, determines to award. The Employment Agreements also provide for
certain severance benefits. If the employment of Mr. LeBlanc is terminated by
either Summit Properties without "cause" or by Mr. LeBlanc for "cause" (as
defined in his Employment Agreement) during the original term or any extended
term of the Employment Agreement, Mr. LeBlanc will be entitled to receive as
severance an amount equal to his base salary, as in effect on the date of
termination, through the remainder of his original term of employment or the
then current extended term, as the case may be, under his Employment Agreement,
payable over time. If the employment of Mr. Hamilton is terminated by Summit
Properties without "cause" or by Mr. Hamilton for "cause" (as defined in his
Employment Agreement), Mr. Hamilton will be entitled to receive as severance an
amount equal to his base salary as in effect on the date of termination for a
period of six months, payable over time. Upon the termination of the employment
of Mr. LeBlanc by reason of death or disability, his estate or he, as the case
may be, will be entitled to receive a payment equal to his base salary, as in
effect on the date of termination, through the remainder of his original term
of employment under his Employment Agreement, except that in the case of
termination by reason of disability the amount of such benefit shall be offset
by the proceeds of any disability plan awards provided by Summit Properties.
Upon the termination of the employment of Mr. Hamilton by reason of death or
disability, his estate or he, as the case may be, will be entitled to receive a
payment equal to his base salary, as in effect on the date of termination, for
a period of twelve months, except that in the case of termination by reason of
disability the amount of such benefit shall be offset by the proceeds of any
disability plan awards provided by Summit Properties. The Employment Agreements
provide that if either of Messrs. LeBlanc or Hamilton are terminated by Summit
Properties for "cause" or if they voluntarily terminate their employment other
than for "cause" (as defined in the Employment Agreements), no severance amount
will be payable. If the employment of either of Messrs. Paulsen or Schwarz is
terminated for any reason, no severance amount will be payable other than as
provided in the Severance Agreements (as defined below) of Messrs. Paulsen and
Schwarz.
Each of these officers also entered into noncompetition agreements (the
"Noncompetition Agreements") with Summit Properties. Subject to certain limited
exceptions, these agreements (except for the agreements with Mr. LeBlanc, Mr.
Schwarz and Mr. Hamilton) prohibit such individuals from engaging, directly or
indirectly, during the noncompetition period (the "Noncompetition Period") in
any business which engages or attempts to engage in, directly or indirectly,
the acquisition, development, construction, operation, management or leasing of
any multifamily apartment residential real estate property within a 30 mile
radius of any property that Summit Properties owns, operates or manages or that
Summit Properties has
37
undertaken to acquire, develop, construct, operate, manage or lease. The
Noncompetition Period is the period beginning on the date of termination of
employment and ending on the latest of (i) one year from the termination of
their employment with Summit Properties or (ii) the date on which the severance
amounts described above cease. This non-competition provision will expire on or
about February 15, 2000. Subject to certain limited exceptions, the
Noncompetition Agreements prohibit all of the executive officers from engaging
in any businesses prior to their termination of employment, other than those of
Summit Properties without the prior written consent of the Board of Directors
(or in the case of Mr. Schwarz and Mr. Hamilton, without the prior written
consent of the President of Summit Properties). The Noncompetition Agreements
also prohibit the officers for certain periods after their termination from
Summit Properties from hiring certain key employees of Summit Properties or
participating in any efforts to persuade such employees to leave Summit
Properties and from engaging in any manner, directly or indirectly, in any
business which engages or attempts to engage in the acquisition, development,
construction, operation, management or leasing of any of Summit Properties'
then existing Communities or development or acquisition opportunities. Under
the Noncompetition Agreements, such officers are prohibited from disclosing
trade secrets and, for certain periods, other confidential information of
Summit Properties. Mr. Jones terminated his employment with Summit Properties
on May 1, 1998. Under the circumstances pursuant to which he has elected to
terminate his employment, Mr. Jones will not be entitled to any payments or
benefits under his Employment Agreement; however, Mr. Jones will be subject to
the terms of a Noncompetition Agreement.
SEVERANCE AGREEMENTS
Summit Properties entered into Severance Agreements ("Severance
Agreements") with (a) each of Messrs. Paulsen, Jones, Schwarz and Hamilton on
January 2, 1997 and (b) Mr. LeBlanc on July 1, 1998. The Severance Agreements
provide for the payment of severance benefits of up to three times such
officer's annual base salary and cash bonus in the event of the termination of
the officer's employment under certain circumstances following certain "change
in control" or "combination transactions" involving a consolidation or merger.
The benefits payable under the terms of the Severance Agreements are subject to
reduction by the amount of any severance benefits payable under applicable
Employment Agreements.
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP'S COMPENSATION COMMITTEE.
Summit Properties' Executive Compensation Program is administered under the
direction of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Summit
Properties, which is composed of Summit Properties' Independent Directors. The
specific responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are to:
1. Administer Summit Properties' Executive Compensation Program.
2. Review and approve compensation awarded to Summit Properties' executive
officers pursuant to the Executive Compensation Program.
3. Monitor the performance of Summit Properties in comparison to
performance by executive officers in conjunction with executive officer
compensation.
4. Monitor compensation awarded to executive officers of Summit Properties
in comparison to compensation received by executive officers of Summit
Properties' Comparative Compensation Peer Group, as defined below.
Compensation determinations pursuant to the Executive Compensation Program
are generally made at or shortly after the end of the fiscal year. At the end
of the fiscal year, incentive cash bonuses are calculated pursuant to the funds
from operations ("FFO") growth criteria which was contained in the respective
Summit Properties Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan approved by the Compensation
Committee prior to or at the beginning of the fiscal year. Payment of a cash
bonus is subject to audited confirmation of Summit Properties financial
performance, which occurs immediately after the end of the fiscal year. Also at
the end of the fiscal year, base salaries and grants of long-term equity based
compensation under the 1994 Stock Plan are set for the following fiscal year.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee takes into
account recommendations from management as well as the specific factors
enumerated herein for specific elements of compensation. The Compensation
Committee periodically reviews comparative compensation data which includes
data on Summit Properties' Comparative Compensation Peer Group as well as data
from other companies with attributes comparable to Summit Properties.
THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE. The philosophy of the
Compensation Committee as reflected in the specific compensation plans included
in the Executive Compensation Program is to:
38
1. Attract, retain and reward experienced, highly motivated executive
officers who are capable of effectively leading and continuing the growth of
Summit Properties.
2. Place more emphasis on short-term and long-term incentive compensation,
which is dependent upon both Summit Properties and individual performance,
rather than base salary.
3. Reward and encourage executive officer activity that results in enhanced
value for stockholders.
4. Link both short-term and long-term incentive compensation as much as
possible to the achievement of specific individual and Summit Properties goals.
ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION. It is the belief of the Compensation Committee
that the above philosophy can best be implemented through three separate
components of executive compensation with each component designed to reward
different performance goals, yet with all three components working together to
satisfy the ultimate goal of enhancing stockholder value. The three elements of
executive compensation are:
1. Salary, which compensates the executive for performing the basic job
description through the performance of routine designated tasks.
2. Cash bonus, which rewards the executive for commendable performance of
specially designated tasks or outstanding performance of routine designated
tasks during the fiscal year.
3. Stock options and/or stock grants, which provide long term rewards to
the executive in a manner directly related to the enhancement of stockholder
value through an appreciated stock price.
In administering each element of compensation, the Compensation Committee
considers the integration of that element not only with the other two elements
of compensation, but also with additional benefits available to the executive
such as the 1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Summit Properties
provided insurance benefits, and Summit Properties sponsored retirement savings
plans.
BASE SALARY. Base salaries for executive officers are set based on the
following factors:
1. Comparison to executive officer base salaries for the Comparative
Compensation Peer Group (as defined below) to the extent such data is
available.
2. Individual performance of the routine designated tasks assigned.
3. Overall experience of the executive officer.
4. Historical relationship with Summit Properties.
As a result of the Compensation Committee's philosophy of focusing the
compensation of Summit Properties' executive officers on performance-based
rewards, the base salaries of the executive officers are lower than the
Comparative Compensation Peer Group.
Base salary increases for executive officers are considered annually by
the Compensation Committee. The granting of salary increases is dependent upon:
1. The executive's performance in the following areas:
a. Accomplishing the routine designated tasks of the position.
b. Promoting Summit Properties values.
c. Development and training of subordinate Summit Properties employees.
d. Leadership abilities and team member abilities.
e. The satisfaction of the executive officer's respective internal or
external customers.
2. Increased or revised job responsibilities.
3. Comparison to the Comparative Compensation Peer Group.
Based upon the above criteria, Messrs. Paulsen, Schwarz and Hamilton were
each awarded an increase in their 1998 base salary (as set forth in the above
Summary Compensation Table).
39
CASH BONUSES. Summit Properties' 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan rewards
Summit Properties executives with annual cash bonuses based on favorable
performance by both Summit Properties and the individual executive. This plan
was formulated to foster a team performance among the executive officers in
accomplishing goals for growth in FFO per share of Common Stock ("per share
FFO") while at the same time aligning executive annual cash incentive goals
with stockholder goals through the translation of per share FFO growth into an
appreciated share price. For 1998, 100% of Mr. Paulsen's and Mr. LeBlanc's cash
bonuses were dependent upon growth in per share FFO over the previous fiscal
year. Mr. Schwarz's cash bonus was dependent in large part on per share FFO
growth over the prior fiscal year and a minority portion of his cash bonus was
dependent upon commendable performance of specially assigned tasks and
outstanding performance of routine duties. The majority of Mr. Hamilton's cash
bonus for 1998 was dependent on the attainment of certain stabilized property
operating income goals compared to certain other multifamily real estate
investment trusts which the Compensation Committee considers to be in the
Company's peer group. The remainder of Mr. Hamilton's cash bonus was dependent
upon commendable performance of specially assigned tasks and outstanding
performance of routine duties. For 1998, the majority of Mr. Jones' cash bonus
was dependent upon the success of new development projects and the achievement
of targeted financial returns in excess of Summit Properties' cost of capital.
The remainder of Mr. Jones' cash bonus was comprised of (i) an objective
component based on the achievement of certain property specific operating
income and leasing goals and (ii) a subjective component based on his
performance in promoting team building within Summit Properties. Mr. Jones
terminated his employment with Summit Properties on May 1, 1998.
The 1998 Incentive Compensation Plan was approved by the Compensation
Committee in September of 1997, thereby establishing the specific per share FFO
growth criteria and requisite financial returns on development communities upon
which executive officers' cash bonuses were dependent. For fiscal year 1998,
the threshold per share FFO growth criteria was achieved. As a result, Mr.
Paulsen and Mr. LeBlanc received a cash bonus. Mr. Schwarz also received a cash
bonus, which was dependent on growth in per share FFO as well as that portion
of his cash bonus based upon commendable performance of specially assigned
tasks and outstanding fulfillment of routine duties. In fiscal year 1998, the
required operating income growth goals (compared to certain other multifamily
real estate investment trusts which the Compensation Committee considers to be
in the Company's peer group) for stabilized properties was achieved during
certain periods and therefore Mr. Hamilton did receive a portion of his cash
bonus dependent upon such goals. Moreover, Mr. Hamilton did receive that
portion of his cash bonus dependent upon commendable performance of specially
assigned tasks and outstanding performance of routine duties. In fiscal year
1998, the required financial returns for certain development projects were
achieved and Mr. Jones did receive a bonus relative to that performance.
Furthermore, operating income growth and lease-up thresholds for certain
properties developed by Mr. Jones were achieved and therefore he did receive
that component of his cash bonus.
STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK GRANTS. The Compensation Committee believes that
awards of stock options or stock grants provide long-term incentive
compensation to executive officers that is aligned most directly with the
achievement of enhanced value for stockholders through an appreciating stock
price. As such, the Compensation Committee believes that awards of stock
options or stock grants should be made to executive officers in meaningful
amounts on a regular basis. When granting stock, it is the intention of the
Compensation Committee to utilize restricted stock grants subject to a three to
five year vesting period, other than in instances where stock is granted in
lieu of cash compensation, in which case the Compensation Committee may award
unrestricted stock which is not subject to vesting.
The number of stock options or stock grants awarded to an executive
officer is based on the following criteria:
1. Overall responsibility of the executive officer.
2. Overall ability to contribute to an increase in FFO per share.
3. Level of base salary component of compensation.
4. Level of incentive cash bonus, in that any fiscal year cash bonus
amounts in excess of 50% of the respective executive officer's base salary will
be paid to that executive in restricted stock of comparable value.
The Compensation Committee considers the awards of stock options or
restricted stock grants on a current basis only. The existing stockholdings of
an individual executive are not taken into consideration when awarding stock
options or restricted stock grants.
In 1998, Summit Properties granted Steven R. LeBlanc stock options to
purchase 175,000 shares of Common Stock as part of his initial compensation
package. The 1998 cash bonus of each of Messrs. Paulsen and Schwarz exceeded
50% of their respective base salaries. Accordingly, Mr. Paulsen received
restricted stock awards of comparable value. The shares of such restricted
stock will vest 50% on January 13, 2000, and the remaining 50% will vest on
January 13, 2001. Mr. Schwarz,
40
however, received 100% of his 1998 cash bonus in cash (as Summit Properties'
policy to issue stock in lieu of that portion of cash bonus in excess of 50% of
base salary was waived for Mr. Schwarz in order to facilitate the payment of
taxes incurred by Mr. Schwarz, due to the vesting of certain restricted stock
grants, thereby enhancing Mr. Schwarz's ability to retain ownership of a larger
portion of such stock grants).
DEFINITION OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (FFO). As noted above, certain
elements of executive compensation are based on achieving specific goals in per
share FFO growth. The White Paper on Funds from Operations approved by the
Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
in March 1995 defines Funds from Operations as net income (loss) (computed in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP")), excluding
gains (or losses) from debt restructuring and sales of property, plus real
estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Summit Properties believes
Funds from Operations is helpful to investors as a measure of the performance
of an equity REIT because, along with cash flows from operating activities,
financing activities and investing activities, it provides investors with an
understanding of the ability of Summit Properties to incur and service debt and
make capital expenditures. Summit Properties computes Funds from Operations in
accordance with the standards established by the White Paper, which may differ
from the methodology for calculating Funds from Operations utilized by other
equity REITs, and, accordingly, may not be comparable to such other REITs.
Funds from Operations does not represent amounts available for management's
discretionary use because of needed capital expenditures or expansion, debt
service obligations, property acquisitions, development, dividends and
distributions or other commitments and uncertainties. Funds from Operations
should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in
accordance with GAAP) as an indication of Summit Properties' financial
performance or to cash flows from operating activities (determined in
accordance with GAAP) as a measure of Summit Properties' liquidity, nor is it
indicative of funds available to fund Summit Properties' cash needs, including
its ability to make dividends/distributions.
COMPENSATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. Mr. Paulsen's total
compensation for fiscal year 1998 consisted of base salary and a cash bonus.
Based on per share FFO growth performance for fiscal year 1998, Mr. Paulsen
received a cash bonus. The Compensation Committee believes that compared to the
market, Mr. Paulsen's base salary and potential maximum cash bonus based on per
share FFO growth of Summit Properties, are each respectively and when combined,
conservative in comparison to the Comparative Compensation Peer Group.
COMPARATIVE COMPENSATION PEER GROUP. The Compensation Committee compares
both the individual components as well as total compensation of executive
officers to compensation practices in the comparative market by periodically
reviewing data on the Comparative Compensation Peer Group provided by
management or outside consultants. The Comparative Compensation Peer Group is
primarily a sampling of REITs with similar characteristics to Summit Properties
as well as some similar sized companies from other industries. Utilization of
this comparative data provides assurance to both executive officers and Summit
Properties' stockholders that executive officers are being compensated
adequately yet reasonably in the context of the overall market. While
comparative market data is valuable in providing assurance of reasonable
compensation for executive officers, Summit Properties' stated policy of
emphasizing performance-based compensation will result in base salaries for
executive officers being below the comparative norm.
The compensation Committee believes that equity REITs that comprise the
Comparative Compensation Peer Group are the most direct comparisons for Summit
Properties and its Executive Compensation Program.
DEDUCTION LIMIT OF $1 MILLION PURSUANT TO SECTION 162(M). The Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") requires that this report comment upon
Summit Properties' policy with respect to Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code which limits the deductibility on Summit Properties' tax return of
compensation over $1 million to any of the Named Executive Officers of Summit
Properties unless, in general, the compensation is paid pursuant to a plan
which is performance related, non-discretionary and has been approved by Summit
Properties' stockholders. The Committee's policy with respect to Section 162(m)
is to make every reasonable effort to insure that compensation is deductible to
the extent permitted, while simultaneously providing Summit Properties
executives with appropriate awards for their performance. Summit Properties did
not pay any compensation during 1998 that would be subject to Section 162(m).
SUBMITTED BY THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE:
Henry H. Fishkind
James H. Hance, Jr.
Nelson Schwab III
John Crosland, Jr.
41
THE FOREGOING REPORT SHOULD NOT BE DEEMED INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE BY ANY
GENERAL STATEMENT INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE THIS STATEMENT INTO ANY FILING
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATES THIS
INFORMATION BY REFERENCE AND SHALL NOT OTHERWISE BE DEEMED FILED UNDER SUCH
ACTS.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Fishkind, Hance, Schwab and
Crosland. None of these individuals has served as an officer of Summit
Properties. Messrs. Hance, Schwab and Crosland serve as officers and directors
of lending institutions that have provided financing and related services to
Operating Partnership. James H. Hance, Jr. is a Vice Chairman and the Chief
Financial Officer of Bank of America and Nelson Schwab III and John Crosland,
Jr. are members of the Board of Directors of First Union National Bank ("First
Union"). Bank of America and First Union have provided the Operating
Partnership with credit enhancements on certain of the Operating Partnership's
communities financed with tax-exempt bonds and are both members of a group of
banks that provide the Operating Partnership's $200 million unsecured credit
facility. As stated above, after the Annual Meeting, Mr. Crosland will cease to
be a member of the Compensation Committee.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of Units for (i)
each of the Directors and the Named Executive officers, (ii) the Directors and
Named Executive Officers of Summit Properties as a group and (iii) each limited
partner of the Operating Partnership that the Operating Partnership believes
holds more than a 5% beneficial interest in the Operating Partnership. Unless
otherwise indicated in the footnotes, all of such beneficial interests are
owned directly, and the indicated person has sole voting and investment power.
The information in the following table was provided by the unitholders listed
and reflects their beneficial ownership known by the Operating Partnership and
Summit Properties on December 31, 1998.
NUMBER OF UNITS PERCENT OF
NAME AND BUSINESS ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNERS* BENEFICIALLY OWNED ALL UNITS
- ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- -----------
Directors and Executive Officers
William B. McGuire, Jr. .................................... 620,313 1.9%
William F. Paulsen ......................................... 596,045 1.8%
Raymond V. Jones ........................................... 274,526 **
Michael L. Schwarz ......................................... -- **
William B. Hamilton ........................................ -- **
Henry H. Fishkind .......................................... -- **
James H. Hance, Jr. ........................................ -- **
Nelson Schwab III .......................................... -- **
John Crosland, Jr. ......................................... 1,152,723*** 3.6%
All directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons) 2,643,607 8.2%
5% Holders
Summit Properties Inc. ..................................... 27,805,836 86.2%
- ---------
* The business address of each person is: c/o Summit Properties Inc., 212
South Tryon, Suite 500 Charlotte, NC 28281
** Less than one percent
*** The indicated ownership includes (a) 307,311 Units owned by JMJ Associates
Limited Partnership, a limited partnership in which Mr. Crosland owns an
equity interest and indirectly serves as the general partners, (b) 387,646
Units owned by The Crosland Group, Inc., a corporation in which Mr.
Crosland owns an equity interest (the "Crosland Group"), (c) 51,101 Units
owned by Crosland-Erwin & Associates, No, VI, a general partnership in
which the Crosland Group owns an equity interest, (d) 108,554 Units,
86,125 Units and 91,162 Units owned by Westbury Place Associates, Westbury
Woods Associates and Westbury Park Associates, respectively, each a
limited partnerships with respect to which Mr. Crosland serves as
co-general partner, (e) 2,381 Units owned by Crosland Investors, Inc., a
corporation in which Mr. Crosland owns an equity interest and (f) 11,566
Units owned by the John Crosland, Sr. Trust, a trust with respect to which
Mr. Crosland serves as co-trustee, as to all of which Mr. Crosland
disclaims beneficial interest. Mr. Crosland owns 106,877 Units directly.
42
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Operating Partnership is managed by Summit Properties, in its capacity
as the general partner of the Operating Partnership.
As discussed above, Messrs. Hance and Schwab serve as officers and
directors of lending institutions that have provided financing and related
services to the Operating Partnership. James H. Hance, Jr. is a Vice Chairman
and the Chief Financial Officer of Bank of America, and Nelson Schwab III is a
member of the Board of Directors of First Union. Both Bank of America and First
Union provided the Operating Partnership with credit enhancements on certain of
its communities financed with tax-exempt bonds and are both members of a group
of banks that provide the Operating Partnership's $200 million unsecured credit
facility.
LOANS TO OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
The Board of Directors of Summit Properties, including the Compensation
Committee thereof, believes that ownership of Summit Properties' Common Stock
by executive officers and certain other qualified employees of Summit
Properties and its subsidiaries aligns the interests of such officers and
employees with the interests of the stockholders of Summit Properties. To
further such goal of aligning the interests of such officers and employees with
the interests of the stockholders of Summit Properties, the Board of Directors
on September 8, 1997 approved and Summit Properties instituted a loan program
which has subsequently been amended and restated by the Board, under which
Summit Properties may lend amounts to or on behalf of certain of Summit
Properties' executive officers and key employees (hereinafter, a "Loan") for
one or more of the following purposes: (i) to finance the purchase of Common
Stock (A) by executive officers on the open market at then-current market
prices and (B) by other eligible employees through Summit Properties' 1996
Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan; (ii) to finance an employee's
payment of the exercise price of one or more stock options to purchase shares
of Common Stock granted to such employee under the 1994 Stock Plan; or (iii) to
finance the annual tax liability of certain executive officers related to the
vesting of shares of Common Stock which constitute a portion of a restricted
stock award granted to such employee under the 1994 Stock Plan. The maximum
aggregate amount Summit Properties may loan to an executive officer is $500,000
(unless such limit is otherwise waived by the Board of Directors or the
Compensation Committee thereof), and the maximum aggregate amount Summit
Properties may loan to a qualified employee is $100,000. The Board of Directors
has increased such limit to $2,000,000 and $1,000,000 for Messrs. LeBlanc and
Schwarz, respectively. Currently, Messrs. LeBlanc, Schwarz and Hamilton are the
only executive officers to whom Loans have been extended for the purpose of
financing the purchase of Common Stock or the payment of the annual tax
liability related to the vesting of shares of Common Stock which constitute a
portion of a restricted stock award.
The relevant employee shall execute a Promissory Note and Security
Agreement (the "Note") related to each Loan made by Summit Properties. Each
Note will bear interest at the applicable federal rate, as established by the
Internal Revenue Service (the "Applicable Federal Rate"), in effect on the date
of the Note and such rate shall be fixed and the Note shall become due and
payable in full no later than the tenth anniversary of the Note (the "Maturity
Date"). Shares of Common Stock which are the subject of a Loan serve as
collateral (the "Collateral Stock") for the Note until such time as the Note
has been paid in full. Until the Maturity Date, the employee to whom a Loan has
been extended will only be required to repay such Loan through the application
to the outstanding Loan balance of all dividends and distributions related to
the Collateral Stock, first to interest, and the remainder, if any, to
outstanding principal. Such employee may prepay the whole or any part of the
principal amount of the Loan from time to time without premium or penalty.
Summit Properties' recourse against an employee under a Note for satisfaction
of the Loan and all other amounts due is limited to Summit Properties' rights
to the Collateral Stock and 25% or, in the case of Mr. LeBlanc, 10% of the
Principal of the Note for which the employee is personally liable in the event
of any deficiency which may arise upon a foreclosure and sale or other
disposition of the Collateral Stock.
As of February 15, 1999, Summit Properties had extended Loans totaling
$4,771,527.15 to its employees, including the amounts of $1,961,044.50,
$927,303.01 and $499,979.64 which were extended to Messrs. LeBlanc, Schwarz and
Hamilton, respectively. Loans to Mr. LeBlanc in the amount of (i) $960,577.50
bear interest at 5.56% per year (I.E. the Applicable Federal Rate for Loans
made in August, 1998) and (ii) $1,000,467 bear interest at 4.71% (I.E. the
Applicable Federal Rate for Loans made in February, 1999. Loans to Mr. Schwarz
in the amount of $404,043.51 bear interest at 6.13% per year (I.E., the
Applicable Federal Rate for Loans made in January, 1998), (ii) $55,837.50 bear
interest at 5.68% per year (I.E., the Applicable Federal Rate for Loans made in
July, 1998), (iii) $17,425.00 bear interest at 5.56% per year (I.E. the
Applicable Federal Rate for Loans made in August, 1998 and (iv) $449,997 bear
interest at 4.71% (I.E. the Applicable Federal Rate for Loans made in February,
1999). Loans to Mr. Hamilton in the amount of $499,979.64 bear interest at
6.13% per year (I.E., the Applicable Federal Rate for Loans made in January,
1998).
43
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of the Operating Partnership are
listed in the Index to Financial Statements on page of this Report.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On November 13, 1998, the Operating Partnership filed a current report on
Form 8-K in connection with the acquisition of properties from Ewing Industries
and a form 8-K/A-1 was filed on December 1, 1998 to amend the Form 8-K to
include financial statements, pro forma financial information and certain
exhibits.
On December 16, 1998, the Operating Partnership filed a Current Report on
Form 8-K in connection with the disposition of certain properties. The Form 8-K
included pro forma financial information and certain exhibits.
(c) Exhibits
As noted below, certain of the exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation
S-K have been filed with previous reports by the Operating Partnership and
Summit Properties and are incorporated by reference herein.
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.1.1 Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Operating Partnership, as amended. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Operating Partnership's Registration Statement of Form 10, dated April 21, 1997,
filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, File No. 000-22411).
3.1.2 Amendment No. 10 to the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Summit Properties' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
3.1.3 Amendment No. 11 to the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 1998, File No. 000-22411)
3.1.4 Amendment No. 12 to the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 1998, File No. 000-22411).
3.1.5 Amendment No. 13 to the Limited Partnership Agreement of the Operating Partnership (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 1998, File No. 000-22411)
4.1.1 Indenture dated as of August 7, 1997 between the Operating Partnership and First Union National
Bank, relating to the Operating Partnership's Senior Debt Securities. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 11, 1997, File
No. 000-22411).
4.1.2 Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of August 12, 1997 between the Operating Partnership and
First Union National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership's
Amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A-1 filed on August 18, 1997, File No. 000-22411).
4.1.3 Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of December 17, 1997 between the Operating Partnership and
First Union National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Operating Partnership's
Amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A-1 filed on December 17, 1997, File No. 000-22411).
4.1.4 Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of May 29, 1998 between the Operating Partnership and First
Union National Bank. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 1998, File No. 000-22411).
4.2.1 The Operating Partnership's 6.80% Note due 2002, dated August 12, 1997. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership's Amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A-1 filed on
August 18, 1997, File No. 000-22411).
4.2.2 The Operating Partnership's 6.95% Note due 2004, dated August 12, 1997. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.3 to the Operating Partnership's Amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A-1 filed on
August 18, 1997, File No. 000-22411).
4.2.3 The Operating Partnership's 7.20% Note due 2007, dated August 12, 1997. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.4 to the Operating Partnership's Amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A-1 filed on
August 18, 1997, File No. 000-22411).
4.2.4 The Operating Partnership's 6 5/8% Note due 2003, dated December 17, 1997. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Operating Partnership's Amended Current Report on Form 8-K/A-1 filed
on December 17, 1997, File No. 000-22411).
44
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- ------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.2.5 6.75% Medium-Term Note due 2001 in principal amount of $30,000,000 issued by the Operating
Partnership on July 28, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Operating Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1998, File No. 000-22411).
4.2.6 6.71% Medium-Term Note due 2000 in principal amount of $25,000,000 issued by the Operating
Partnership on October 5, 1998. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Operating
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1998, File
No. 000-22411).
10.1.1 Articles of Incorporation of Summit Properties. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Summit
Properties' Registration Statement on Form S-11, Registration No. 33-90706).
10.1.2 Bylaws of the Summit Properties. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Summit Properties'
Registration Statement on Form S-11, Registration No. 33-90706).
10.2.1 Articles of Incorporation of Summit Management Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3
to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, File
No. 001-12792).
10.2.2 Bylaws of Summit Management Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Summit
Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, File No.
001-12792).
10.3 Summit Properties Inc. 1994 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.6 to Summit Properties' Registration Statement on Form S-11, Registration No. 33-90706).
10.4 Summit Properties Inc. 1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.5 to Summit Properties' Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No.
333-00078).
10.5 Indemnification Agreement, dated January 29, 1994, among Summit Properties, the Operating
Partnership and the individuals named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Summit
Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, File No.
001-12792).
10.6.1 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and William F. Paulsen. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7.1 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.2 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and William B. McGuire, Jr. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7.2 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.3 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and Raymond V. Jones. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7.3 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.4 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and David F. Tufaro. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7.4 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.5 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and John C. Moore. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.7.5 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.6 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and Michael G. Malone. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7.6 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.7 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and Keith L. Downey. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.12.3 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1993, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.8 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and Christopher A. Hughes. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.12.3 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1993, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.9 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and William B. Hamilton. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7.9 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.10 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and Michael L. Schwarz. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7.10 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.6.11 Employment Agreement between Summit Properties and Steven R. LeBlanc. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.7.11 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
45
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- ------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.7.1 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and William F. Paulsen. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8.1 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.2 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and William B. McGuire, Jr. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8.2 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.3 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and Raymond V. Jones. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8.3 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.4 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and Keith H. Kuhlman. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8.4 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.5 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and David F. Tufaro. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.8.5 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.6 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and John T. Gray. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8.6 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.7 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and John C. Moore. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.8.7 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.8 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and Michael G. Malone. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8.8 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.9 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and William B. Hamilton. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8.9 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.10 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and Michael L. Schwarz. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8.10 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.7.11 Noncompetition Agreement between Summit Properties and Steven R. LeBlanc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.8.11 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.8.1 Executive Severance Agreement between Summit Properties and William F. Paulsen. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9.1 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.8.2 Executive Severance Agreement between Summit Properties and William B. McGuire, Jr. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.9.2 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.8.3 Executive Severance Agreement between Summit Properties and Michael L. Schwarz. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9.3 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.8.4 Executive Severance Agreement between Summit Properties and Raymond V. Jones. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9.4 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.8.5 Executive Severance Agreement between Summit Properties and William B. Hamilton. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9.5 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.8.6 Executive Severance Agreement between Summit Properties and Steven R. LeBlanc (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.9.6 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.9 $2,500,000 Promissory Note, dated February 15, 1994 and maturing on February 15, 2004, between
Summit Management Company and Old Summit Management Company. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1993, File No. 001-12792).
10.10 $31,000,000 Loan Agreement, dated July 31, 1996, between the Operating Partnership and Wachovia
Bank of North Carolina, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Summit Properties'
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1996, File No. 001-12792).
46
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.11.1 Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated January 28, 1998 between Summit Properties and
Michael L. Schwarz. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1 to Summit Properties' Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.2 Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated January 28, 1998 between Summit Properties and
William B. Hamilton. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.2 to Summit Properties' Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.3 Form of Promissory Note and Security Agreement between Summit Properties and the employees listed
on the schedule thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.3 to Summit Properties' Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.4 Promissory Note and Security Agreement, dated August 5, 1998 between Summit Properties and Steven
R. LeBlanc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12.4 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.5 Promissory Note, dated as of January 28, 1998, evidencing a loan of $42,258 to Michael L. Schwarz
for the purpose of paying tax liability associated with Restricted Stock Award. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Summit Properties' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.6 Promissory Note, dated as of January 30, 1998, evidencing a loan of $361,785 to Michael L. Schwarz
for the purpose of purchasing shares of Common Stock of Summit Properties Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Summit Properties' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.7 Promissory Note, dated as of January 28, 1998, evidencing a loan of $57,418 to William B. Hamilton
for the purpose of paying tax liability associated with Restricted Stock Award. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Summit Properties' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.8 Promissory Note, dated as of January 30, 1998, evidencing a loan of $441,562 to William B. Hamilton
for the purpose of purchasing shares of Common Stock of Summit Properties Inc. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Summit Properties' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.9 Promissory Note, dated as of August 5, 1998, evidencing a loan of $961,000 to Steven R. LeBlanc for
the purpose of purchasing shares of Common Stock of Summit Properties. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 of Summit Properties' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.10 Promissory Note, dated February 2, 1999, evidencing a loan of $1,000,487.05 to Steven R. LeBlanc for
the purpose of purchasing shares of common stock of Summit Properties (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.12.10 of Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.11.11 Promissory Note, dated February 2, 1999, evidencing a loan of $450,004.09 to Michael L. Schwarz for
the purpose of purchasing shares of common stock of Summit Properties (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.12.11 or Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.12.1 Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 12, 1994 between Summit Properties and PK Partners,
L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.1 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
10.12.2 Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 8, 1994, between Summit Properties and the Continuing
Investors named therein. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Summit Properties' Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, File No. 001-12792).
10.12.3 Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 11, 1995, between Summit Properties and Bissell
Ballantyne, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Summit Properties' Registration
Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-24669).
10.12.4 Registration Rights Agreement, dated January 10, 1996, among Summit Properties, Joseph H. Call and
Gary S. Cangelosi. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Summit Properties' Registration
Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-24669).
10.12.5 Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 20, 1997, among Summit Properties, The Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company, J. Ronald Terwilliger, J. Ronald Terwilliger Grantor Trust, Crow
Residential Realty Investors, L.P., Douglas A. Hoeksema, Randy J. Pace, Clifford A. Breining, TCF
Residential Partnership, Ltd. and Trammell S. Crow. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Summit Properties' Registration Statement on Form, Registration No. 333-24669).
10.12.6 Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 16, 1995, between Summit Properties and the individuals
named therein executed in connection with the Crosland Acquisition (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15.6 of Summit Properties' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1997, File No. 001-12792).
47
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION
- ------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.13 Agreement to Contribute, dated February 13, 1995, between Summit Properties, the Operating
Partnership and Crosland Partnerships. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Summit Properties'
Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 16, 1995, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.1 Credit Agreement, dated as of March 27, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Summit
Properties, the Banks listed on the signature pages thereof and the other Lenders from time to time
party thereto, and First Union National Bank, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders thereunder.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Summit Properties' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.2 Letter Agreement, dated November 25, 1998, by and among the Operating Partnership, Summit
Properties, Wachovia Bank, N.A. ("Wachovia") and First Union National Bank, as Administrative
Agent and Lender under the 1998 Credit Agreement ("First Union"), evidencing an increase in First
Union's and Wachovia's Commitments (as defined in the 1998 Credit Agreement) under the 1998
Credit Agreement of $15,000,000 and $10,000,000, respectively (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.15.2 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.3 Replacement Competitive Note, dated November 25, 1998 by and among the Operating Partnership,
Summit Properties and First Union reflecting the increased Commitments (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15.3 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.4 Replacement Competitive Note, dated November 25, 1998 by and among the Operating Partnership,
Summit Properties and Wachovia reflecting the increased Commitments (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15.4 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.5 Replacement Competitive Note, dated November 25, 1998 by and among the Operating Partnership,
Summit Properties and NationsBank, N.A. reflecting the increased Commitments (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.15.5 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.6 Replacement Competitive Note, dated November 25, 1998 by and among the Operating Partnership,
Summit Properties and Commerzbank, A.G. reflecting the increased Commitments (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.15.6 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.7 Replacement Competitive Note, dated November 25, 1998 by and among the Operating Partnership,
Summit Properties and PNC Bank, National Association reflecting the increased Commitments
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17.7 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.8 Replacement Competitive Note, dated November 25, 1998 by and among the Operating Partnership,
Summit Properties and AmSouth Bank reflecting the increased Commitments (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.15.8 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.9 Replacement Revolving Note, dated November 25, 1998 by and among the Operating Partnership,
Summit Properties and First Union reflecting the increased Commitments (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15.9 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.14.10 Replacement Revolving Note, dated November 25, 1998 by and among the Operating Partnership,
Summit Properties and Wachovia reflecting the increased Commitments (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15.10 to Summit Properties' Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
10.15 $8,730,000 Promissory Note, dated August 30, 1995, issued by the Operating Partnership to the Public
Employee's Retirement Association of Colorado. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Operating Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1998,
File No. 000-22411).
12.1 Statement Regarding Calculation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Years Ended
December 31, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994 and 1993 (filed herewith).
21.1 Subsidiaries of Summit Properties Partnership, L.P. (filed herewith).
23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. (Included in the Independent Auditor's Report dated January 21,
1999 on page 51 of the Operating Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1998, File No. 001-12792).
27 Financial Data Schedule (filed herewith).
48
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Summit Properties Partnership, L.P. certifies that it has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in Charlotte, North Carolina on March 18, 1999.
SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
BY: Summit Properties Inc., as General
Partner
/s/ WILLIAM F. PAULSEN
----------------------------------------
WILLIAM F. PAULSEN,
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the
dates indicated. Each person below has signed this report as an officer or
director of Summit Properties Inc., in its capacity as general partner of
Summit Properties Partnership, L.P.
SIGNATURES TITLE DATE
- ----------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- ---------------
/s/ WILLIAM B. MCGUIRE, JR. Chairman of the Board of Directors March 18, 1999
- ----------------------------------
WILLIAM B. MCGUIRE, JR.
/s/ WILLIAM F. PAULSEN Chief Executive Officer and Director March 18, 1999
- ----------------------------------
WILLIAM F. PAULSEN (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ STEVEN R. LEBLANC President, Chief Operating Officer and March 18, 1999
- ----------------------------------
STEVEN R. LEBLANC Director (Principal Operating Officer)
/s/ MICHAEL L. SCHWARZ Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice March 18, 1999
- ----------------------------------
MICHAEL L. SCHWARZ President (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ JOHN CROSLAND, JR. Director March 18, 1999
- ----------------------------------
JOHN CROSLAND, JR.
/s/ HENRY H. FISHKIND Director March 18, 1999
- ----------------------------------
HENRY H. FISHKIND
/s/ JAMES H. HANCE, JR. Director March 18, 1999
- ----------------------------------
JAMES H. HANCE, JR.
/s/ NELSON SCHWAB, III Director March 18, 1999
- ----------------------------------
NELSON SCHWAB, III
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following financial statements of the Operating Partnership required
to be included in Item 14(a)(1) are listed below:
SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
PAGE
-----
Independent Auditors' Report ............................................................. 51
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 ............................. 52
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 . 53
Consolidated Statements of Partners' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 54
and 1996
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 55
1996
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ............................................... 56
50
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Partners
Summit Properties Partnership, L.P.
Charlotte, North Carolina
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Summit
Properties Partnership, L.P.(the "Operating Partnership") as of December 31,
1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, partners'
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Operating
Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform our audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of the Operating Partnership as
of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
We consent to the incorporation by reference of the above report in
Registration Statement No. 333-25575-01 on Form S-3 of Summit Properties
Partnership, L.P.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
January 21, 1999
51
SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
1998 1997
------------- -------------
ASSETS
Real estate assets:
Land and land improvements .............................................................. $ 169,374 $ 133,316
Buildings and improvements .............................................................. 836,054 643,812
Furniture, fixtures and equipment ....................................................... 63,963 53,573
---------- ----------
1,069,391 830,701
Less: accumulated depreciation .......................................................... (115,128) (105,979)
---------- ----------
Operating real estate assets .......................................................... 954,263 724,722
Construction in progress ................................................................ 137,145 82,332
---------- ----------
Net real estate assets ................................................................ 1,091,408 807,054
Cash and cash equivalents ................................................................ 2,837 3,563
Restricted cash .......................................................................... 91,981 3,180
Investment in Summit Management Company .................................................. 1,330 1,212
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $4,472 and $3,495 in 1998 and
1997 .................................................................................... 7,538 7,378
Other assets ............................................................................. 3,973 3,308
---------- ----------
Total assets ............................................................................. $1,199,067 $ 825,695
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY
Liabilities:
Notes payable ........................................................................... $ 726,103 $ 474,673
Accrued interest payable ................................................................ 6,806 4,916
Accounts payable and accrued expenses ................................................... 32,745 19,945
Distributions payable ................................................................... 12,713 11,030
Security deposits and prepaid rents ..................................................... 4,188 3,561
---------- ----------
Total liabilities ..................................................................... 782,555 514,125
---------- ----------
Commitments ..............................................................................
Partners' equity:
Operating units-issued and outstanding 32,242,074 and 27,438,400 ........................
General partner -- outstanding 322,421 and 274,384 ...................................... 4,895 3,847
Limited partners -- outstanding 31,919,653 and 27,164,016 ............................... 411,617 307,723
---------- ----------
Total partners' equity ................................................................ 416,512 311,570
---------- ----------
Total liabilities and partners' equity ................................................... $1,199,067 $ 825,695
========== ==========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
52
SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER UNIT DATA)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------------- -------------- --------------
Revenues:
Rental ...................................................................... $ 137,660 $ 109,827 $ 88,864
Other property income ....................................................... 7,996 6,179 4,683
Interest .................................................................... 1,064 392 558
Other income ................................................................ 849 279 384
----------- ----------- -----------
Total revenues ........................................................... 147,569 116,677 94,489
----------- ----------- -----------
Expenses:
Property operating and maintenance:
Personnel ................................................................. 11,350 9,278 8,368
Advertising and promotion ................................................. 2,419 2,095 1,417
Utilities ................................................................. 6,240 5,033 4,115
Building repairs and maintenance .......................................... 9,893 8,790 7,547
Real estate taxes and insurance ........................................... 14,063 10,721 8,823
Depreciation .............................................................. 28,997 22,652 18,208
Property supervision ...................................................... 3,531 2,783 2,240
Other operating expenses .................................................. 4,054 3,332 2,716
----------- ----------- -----------
80,547 64,684 53,434
Interest .................................................................... 33,506 21,959 17,138
General and administrative .................................................. 3,861 2,740 2,557
Loss (income) on equity investments:
Summit Management Company ................................................. 327 (274) 173
Real estate joint venture ................................................. 1 -- --
----------- ----------- -----------
Total expenses ........................................................... 118,242 89,109 73,302
----------- ----------- -----------
Income before gain on sale of real estate assets and extraordinary items ..... 29,327 27,568 21,187
Gain on sale of real estate assets ........................................... 37,148 4,366 --
----------- ----------- -----------
Income before extraordinary items ............................................ 66,475 31,934 21,187
Extraordinary items .......................................................... (594) -- (626)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income ................................................................... 65,881 31,934 20,561
Net income allocated to general partner ...................................... (659) (319) (206)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net income allocated to limited partners ..................................... $ 65,222 $ 31,615 $ 20,355
=========== =========== ===========
Per unit data:
Income before extraordinary items -- basic and diluted ...................... $ 2.28 $ 1.17 $ 0.92
=========== =========== ===========
Extraordinary items -- basic and diluted .................................... $ (0.02) -- $ (0.02)
=========== =========== ===========
Net income -- basic and diluted ............................................. $ 2.26 $ 1.17 $ 0.90
=========== =========== ===========
Distributions declared ...................................................... $ 1.63 $ 1.59 $ 1.55
=========== =========== ===========
Weighted average units -- basic ............................................. 29,140,931 27,257,637 22,914,069
=========== =========== ===========
Weighted average units -- diluted ........................................... 29,150,315 27,294,058 22,940,998
=========== =========== ===========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
53
SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
GENERAL LIMITED
PARTNER PARTNERS TOTAL
------------ ------------ -----------
Balance, December 31, 1995 .............................. $2,718 $ 214,778 $ 217,496
Distributions .......................................... (365) (36,096) (36,461)
Contributions from Summit Properties related to:
Proceeds from public offering ........................ 976 96,658 97,634
Proceeds from dividend and stock purchase plans ...... 16 1,581 1,597
Exercise of stock options ............................ 3 284 287
Amortization of restricted stock grants .............. 2 200 202
Issuance of units related to property acquisitions ..... 210 1,890 2,100
Net income ............................................. 206 20,355 20,561
------ --------- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1996 .............................. 3,766 299,650 303,416
Distributions .......................................... (437) (43,223) (43,660)
Contributions from Summit Properties related to:
Proceeds from public offering ........................ 68 6,744 6,812
Proceeds from dividend and stock purchase plans ...... 36 3,571 3,607
Exercise of stock options ............................ 9 842 851
Costs of shelf registrations ......................... (6) (610) (616)
Issuance of stock related to acquisitions ............ 49 4,884 4,933
Amortization of restricted stock grants .............. 4 350 354
Issuance of units related to property acquisitions ..... 39 3,900 3,939
Net income ............................................. 319 31,615 31,934
------- --------- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1997 .............................. 3,847 307,723 311,570
Distributions .......................................... (484) (47,943) (48,427)
Contributions from Summit Properties related to:
Proceeds from dividend and stock purchase plans ...... 429 42,483 42,912
Exercise of stock options ............................ 8 834 842
Issuance of stock related to acquisitions ............ 373 36,970 37,343
Amortization of restricted stock grants .............. 4 436 440
Issuance of units related to property acquisitions ..... 84 8,343 8,427
Issuance of employees notes receivable ................. (25) (2,451) (2,476)
Net income ............................................. 659 65,222 65,881
------- --------- ---------
Balance, December 31, 1998 .............................. $4,895 $ 411,617 $ 416,512
======= ========= =========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
54
SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
------------ ------------ ------------
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income .................................................................... $ 65,881 $ 31,934 $ 20,561
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Extraordinary items .......................................................... 594 -- 626
(Income) loss on equity method investments ................................... 328 (274) 173
Gain on sale of real estate assets ........................................... (37,148) (4,366) --
Depreciation and amortization ................................................ 30,163 23,897 19,183
Decrease in restricted cash .................................................. (777) 941 235
Increase in other assets ..................................................... (504) (162) (866)
Increase in accrued interest payable ......................................... 1,444 3,581 333
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses ............................ 3,823 517 386
Increase (decrease) in security deposits and prepaid rents ................... 4 (121) 545
---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash provided by operating activities ................................... 63,808 55,947 41,176
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows from investing activities:
Construction of real estate assets and land acquisitions, net of payables ..... (122,294) (91,665) (87,081)
Purchase of Communities ....................................................... (124,846) (78,870) (6,360)
Proceeds from sale of Community ............................................... 44,245 9,209 --
Capitalized interest .......................................................... (6,142) (5,873) (4,266)
Recurring capital expenditures ................................................ (4,607) (4,586) (3,291)
Non-recurring capital expenditures ............................................ (5,526) (4,122) (2,973)
---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash used in investing activities ....................................... (219,170) (175,907) (103,971)
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net borrowings on line of credit .............................................. 131,252 (655) 17,792
Net borrowings on unsecured bonds ............................................. 54,392 151,192 30,783
Repayments of mortgage debt ................................................... (27,391) (3,852) (49,537)
Repayment of tax exempt bonds ................................................. (1,050) (1,010) (977)
Distributions to unitholders .................................................. (46,819) (42,971) (34,000)
Contributions from Summit Properties related to:
Proceeds from public offering ................................................ -- 6,812 97,634
Proceeds from dividend and stock purchase plans .............................. 42,912 3,607 1,597
Exercise of stock options .................................................... 842 851 287
Costs of shelf registrations ................................................. -- (616) --
Advance proceeds of direct stock purchase plan ................................ 2,974 6,500 --
Increase in employee notes .................................................... (2,476) -- --
---------- ---------- ----------
Net cash provided by financing activities ................................... 154,636 119,858 63,579
---------- ---------- ----------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ............................ (726) (102) 784
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year .................................... 3,563 3,665 2,881
---------- ---------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year .......................................... $ 2,837 $ 3,563 $ 3,665
========== ========== ==========
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information -- Cash paid for interest,
net of capitalized interest ................................................... $ 31,106 $ 17,321 $ 15,780
========== ========== ==========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
55
SUMMIT PROPERTIES PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND FORMATION OF THE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP
Summit Properties Partnership, L.P. (the "Operating Partnership"), a
Delaware limited partnership, was formed on January 14, 1994 to conduct the
business of developing, leasing and managing multifamily apartment communities
for Summit Properties Inc. ("Summit Properties"). On February 15, 1994, Summit
Properties completed an initial public offering ("Initial Offering"). In
connection with the Initial Offering, the Operating Partnership consummated a
business combination involving the partnerships (the "Property Partnerships")
which owned the 27 communities acquired in connection with the Initial Offering
and the affiliated entities which provided development, construction,
management and leasing services to each of those communities prior to the
Initial Offering (collectively, the "Summit Entities"). A portion of the
proceeds from the Initial Offering was used by Summit Properties to acquire an
economic and voting interest in the Operating Partnership, which was formed to
succeed to substantially all of the interests of the Property Partnerships in
the 27 communities and the operations of the Summit Entities (the "Formation").
Summit Properties became the sole general partner and the majority owner of the
Operating Partnership upon completion of the Initial Offering. Summit
Properties is a self-administered and self-managed equity real estate
investment trust ("REIT").
In June 1995, Summit Properties completed the sale of 4 million shares of
Common Stock (the "1995 Offering"). In August 1996, Summit Properties completed
the sale of 5.75 million shares of Common Stock (the "1996 Offering"). The net
proceeds of $65.9 million and $97.6 million from the 1995 and 1996 Offerings,
respectively, were contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for
units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership ("Units"),
and the Operating Partnership used the proceeds to repay mortgage debt and to
fund current development projects.
Summit Properties conducts all of its business through the Operating
Partnership and its subsidiaries. As of December 31, 1998, Summit Properties
held 86.2% of the outstanding partnership interests of the Operating
Partnership, consisting of a 1% general partner interest and an 85.2% limited
partner interest. The Operating Partnership is obligated to redeem each Unit at
the request of the holder for cash equal to the fair market value of one share
of Summit Properties' Common Stock ("Common Stock"), except that Summit
Properties may elect to acquire each Unit presented for redemption for cash or
one share of Common Stock. Summit Properties has issued Common Stock in
connection with all redemptions to date. With each redemption of outstanding
Units for Common Stock, Summit Properties' percentage ownership interest in the
Operating Partnership will increase. In addition, whenever Summit Properties
issues shares of Common Stock, Summit Properties will contribute any new
proceeds therefrom to the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership
will issue an equivalent number of Units to Summit Properties.
Distributions to holders of Units are made to enable distributions to be
made to Summit Properties' shareholders under Summit Properties' dividend
policy. Federal income tax laws require Summit Properties, as a REIT, to
distribute 95% of its ordinary taxable income. The Operating Partnership makes
distributions to Summit Properties to enable it to satisfy this requirement.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
In conjunction with the Initial Offering, construction, management and
leasing activities for third parties were transferred to Summit Management
Company (the "Management Company") and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Summit
Apartment Builders (the "Construction Company"). The Operating Partnership has
a 99% economic interest in the Management Company but controls only 1% of the
voting stock. The remaining 99% of the voting stock is held by an executive
officer of the Operating Partnership, which stock is subject to certain
restrictions on transfer designed to ensure that the holder of the Management
Company's voting stock will have interests aligned with those of the Operating
Partnership. Because of the Operating Partnership's ability to exercise
significant influence, the Management Company is accounted for on the equity
method of accounting.
As a result of the Formation, the partners and owners of the entities
comprising the Summit Entities have either retained their existing ownership
interests, received shares of Common Stock or received Units in the Operating
Partnership. Purchase accounting was applied to the acquisition of all
non-controlled interests in which cash consideration was paid. The acquisition
of all other interests was accounted for as a reorganization of entities under
common control and, accordingly, was reflected at historical cost in a manner
similar to that in pooling of interests accounting.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
56
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
REAL ESTATE ASSETS AND DEPRECIATION -- Real estate assets are stated at
depreciated cost reduced for any estimated impairment in value of which
management believes there is none at December 31, 1998 and 1997.
Expenditures directly related to the acquisition, development and
improvement of real estate assets are capitalized at cost as land, buildings
and improvements. Improvements are broken down into recurring capital
expenditures and non-recurring capital expenditures. Non-recurring capital
expenditures primarily consist of the cost of improvements such as new garages,
water submeters and improvements made in conjunction with acquisitions and
major renovations. All other improvements are deemed as recurring capital
expenditures.
Ordinary repairs and maintenance, including carpet replacements and
interior painting, are expensed as incurred; major replacements and betterments
are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Depreciation
is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the
properties (buildings -- 40 years; land improvements -- 15 years; furniture,
fixtures and equipment -- 5 to 7 years).
The Operating Partnership records its real estate assets at cost less
accumulated depreciation and adjusts carrying value in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 121, "Accounting for
the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of".
SFAS No. 121 requires that long-lived assets such as real estate assets be
reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book
value of the asset may not be recoverable. If the sum of the estimated future
net cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) from an asset to be
held and used is less than the book value of the asset, an impairment loss must
be recognized in the amount of the difference between book value and fair value
as opposed to the difference between book value and net realizable value under
the previous accounting standard. For long-term assets like apartment
communities, the determination of whether there is an impairment loss is
dependent primarily on the Operating Partnership's estimates on occupancy, rent
and expense increases, which involves numerous assumptions and judgments as to
future events over a period of many years. Assets to be disposed of are
reported at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. At
December 31, 1998 the Operating Partnership does not hold any assets that meet
the impairment criteria of SFAS No. 121. At December 31, 1998, the Operating
Partnership had six apartment communities for sale with a net book value of
approximately $52.5 million. The Operating Partnership does not anticipate
incurring a loss on any individual apartment community sale. The six apartment
communities held for sale represented approximately 6% of property operating
income for the Operating Partnership for the year ended December 31, 1998.
RENTAL REVENUE RECOGNITION -- The Operating Partnership leases its
residential properties under operating leases with terms generally one year or
less. Rental revenue is recognized on the accrual method of accounting as
earned.
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT -- The Management Company provides property management
services for both Operating Partnership owned properties as well as properties
owned by third parties. Revenue is recognized when earned, as the services are
provided.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -- For purposes of the statement of cash flows,
the Operating Partnership considers all highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
RESTRICTED CASH -- Restricted cash is comprised primarily of resident
security deposits, bond repayment escrows, replacement reserve escrows, and
proceeds from apartment community sales deposited with a qualified intermediary
in accordance with like-kind exchange rules and regulations.
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS -- Deferred financing costs include fees and
costs incurred in conjunction with long-term financings and are amortized on
the straight-line method over the terms of the related debt. Such amortization
is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
earnings.
INTEREST AND REAL ESTATE TAXES -- Interest and real estate taxes incurred
during the construction period are capitalized and depreciated over the lives
of the constructed assets. Interest capitalized was $6.1 million, $5.9 million
and $4.3 million for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively.
ADVERTISING COSTS -- The Operating Partnership expenses advertising costs
as incurred.
INCOME TAXES -- In accordance with partnership taxation, each partner is
responsible for reporting its share of taxable income or loss. Accordingly, no
provision has been made in the accompanying financial statements for federal,
state or local income taxes. A portion of the Operating Partnership's
distributions is deemed as return of capital for shareholder income
57
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- (Continued)
tax purposes. The percentage of distributions that was return of capital was
18%, 25% and 21% for each of the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively.
PER UNIT DATA -- Basic earnings per unit with respect to the Operating
Partnership for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 are computed
based upon the weighted average number of Units outstanding during the period.
The difference in "basic" and "diluted" weighted average Units is the dilutive
effect of Summit Properties' stock options outstanding (9,384, 36,421 and
26,930 shares added to weighted Units outstanding in 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively).
ESTIMATES -- The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME -- Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 130
"Reporting Comprehensive Income" (FAS 130), presents standards for reporting
and display of comprehensive income and its components. Besides net income, FAS
130 requires the reporting of other comprehensive income, defined as revenues,
expenses, gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles
are not included in net income. The Operating Partnership has no items of other
comprehensive income in any period presented.
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES -- Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities" (FAS 133), presents standards for accounting for derivative
instruments. FAS 133 is effective for all fiscal quarters of fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 1999. The Operating Partnership currently holds no
derivative instruments and accordingly does not expect FAS 133 to have an
effect on the Operating Partnership's financial position and results of
operations.
4. REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES
The Operating Partnership obtained a 25% interest in a joint venture named
Station Hill in exchange for the contribution of two apartment communities.
Station Hill also owns five apartment communities previously owned by the
Operating Partnership which were sold to Hollow Creek LLC on December 16, 1998
and were concurrently contributed to Station Hill for a 75% joint venture
interest (See Acquisitions and Dispositions -- Note 7). The seven communities
are Summit Green, Summit Hill I & II, Summit Creek, Summit Hollow I & II and
Summit Station. The Operating Partnership's initial investment in Station Hill
was reduced to zero when the Operating Partnership eliminated the portion of
the gain on disposal related to the percentage of joint venture ownership
interest retained. Station Hill is accounted for on the equity method of
accounting.
The Operating Partnership owns a 49% interest in each of two joint
ventures ("Construction Projects"). Each joint venture is developing an
apartment community which will be accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. The projects are both under construction and had no operations as
of December 31, 1998. The construction costs will be funded primarily through
separate loans to each joint venture from unrelated third parties equal to 100%
of the construction costs. During the construction period, in lieu of equity
contribution to each of the respective joint ventures, the Operating
Partnership has under certain circumstances, subsequent to demand by the third
party lenders, agreed to make contributions which would reduce the respective
construction loan by an amount not to exceed 25% of the total construction loan
amount. Any such contribution would be deemed to be all or a portion of the
equity required to be contributed by the Operating Partnership to the
respective joint venture at the end of the construction and lease up period.
The Operating Partnership has the right to purchase its joint venture partner's
interest after the projects are complete.
58
4. REAL ESTATE JOINT VENTURES -- (Continued)
The following is a condensed balance sheet for each of the joint ventures
at December 31, 1998 (in thousands):
STATION CONSTRUCTION
HILL PROJECTS
--------- -------------
Cash ............................................... $ 533 $ 48
Real estate assets other than construction in process 91,577 --
Construction in process ............................ -- 10,578
Other assets ....................................... 669 5
------- -------
Total assets ...................................... $92,779 $10,631
======= =======
Mortgages payable .................................. $70,150 $ --
Construction loan payable .......................... -- 8,725
Construction liabilities payable ................... -- 1,758
Other liabilities .................................. 193 16
Partners' capital .................................. 22,436 132
------- -------
Total liabilities and partner's capital ........... $92,779 $10,631
======= =======
Station Hill began operations on December 16, 1998 while the Construction
Projects have had no operations. Accordingly the operations of the joint
ventures are not material to the Operating Partnership for the year ended
December 31, 1998.
5. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In conjunction with the Formation, construction, management and leasing
activities for third parties were transferred to the Management Company, which
is accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
The Management Company provides management services to the Operating
Partnership. Total fees for management services were $3.9 million, $3.1 million
and $2.4 million for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996,
respectively.
In addition, the Management Company provides management services to
apartment communities in which executive officers and certain Directors of
Summit Properties are general partners. The Management Company received
management fees of approximately $233,000, $214,000 and $267,000 for the
performance of such services for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively.
Construction Company revenue consists of fees on contracts with the
Operating Partnership. Revenue from contracts with the Operating Partnership
was $1.1 million, $1.1 million and $524,000 for the years ended December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively. The Construction Company's profits on these
contracts is eliminated in consolidation against the Operating Partnership's
investment in real estate. The Operating Partnership had a $5.7 million and
$4.6 million construction contract payable to the Construction Company as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
The Operating Partnership's investment in the Management Company as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, reported on the equity method, includes the amounts
shown below. The Operating Partnership's investment in the Management Company
is not considered material to the consolidated financial statements of the
Operating Partnership taken as a whole (in thousands):
1998 1997
----------- -----------
Equity investment .......................................$ 111 $ 242
Note receivable ......................................... 2,500 2,500
Deferred gain on sale of third party contract rights .... (1,281) (1,530)
-------- --------
$ 1,330 $ 1,212
======== ========
59
6. NOTES PAYABLE
Notes payable consist of the following (in thousands):
INTEREST PRINCIPAL OUTSTANDING
RATE AS OF DECEMBER 31,
DECEMBER 31, -----------------------
1998 1998 1997
--------------- ----------- -----------
FIXED RATE DEBT
Mortgage Loan ........................ 6.24% $146,740 $149,593
Mortgage Loan ........................ 8.00% 8,470 8,557
Mortgage Notes ....................... 6.75% - 9.80% 115,443 46,676
Tax Exempt Mortgage Notes ............ 6.95% - 7.25% 9,148 9,262
-------- --------
Total Mortgage Debt ................ 279,801 214,088
Unsecured Debt:
6.71% Medium Term Notes due 2000 ..... 6.71% 25,000 --
6.75% Medium Term Notes due 2001 ..... 6.75% 30,000 --
6.80% Notes due 2002 ................. 6.80% 25,000 25,000
6.63% Notes due 2003 ................. 6.63% 30,000 30,000
6.95% Notes due 2004 ................. 6.95% 50,000 50,000
7.20% Notes due 2007 ................. 7.20% 50,000 50,000
Bank Note due 2002 ................... 7.85% 16,000 16,000
Bank Note due 2000 ................... 7.61% 15,000 15,000
-------- --------
Total Unsecured Debt ................ 241,000 186,000
-------- --------
Total Fixed Rate Debt ............... 520,801 400,088
VARIABLE RATE DEBT
Unsecured Credit Facility ............ LIBOR +90 153,500 21,733
Tax Exempt Bonds ..................... 5.55% 51,802 52,852
-------- --------
Total Variable Rate Debt ........... 205,302 74,585
-------- --------
TOTAL OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS ......... $726,103 $474,673
======== ========
The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) at December 31, 1998 was 5.63%.
MORTGAGE LOANS -- On September 23, 1998, the Operating Partnership
consolidated and renewed two mortgage loans which had a $147.2 million balance.
The original loans matured in February 2001 ($118.3 million at 5.88%) and
December 2005 ($28.9 million at 7.71%). The consolidation and renewal combined
the two mortgage loans into one loan at an interest rate equal to the existing
weighted average interest rate of the two previous mortgage loans (6.24%) up to
February 2001. As of February 2001, the rate of interest on the loan will
increase to 6.76% until the loan matures in October of 2008.
The 8.00% Mortgage Loan requires monthly principal and interest payments
on a 30-year amortization schedule with a balloon payment due at maturity in
September, 2005.
MORTGAGE NOTES -- The Mortgage Notes bear interest at fixed rates ranging
from 6.75% to 9.80% and require monthly interest and principal payments over
the life of the notes which range from the year 2002 to 2029. The weighted
average interest rate and debt maturity at December 31, 1998 for these ten
Mortgage Notes were 7.20% and 8.4 years, respectively.
TAX EXEMPT MORTGAGE NOTES -- The Tax Exempt Mortgage Notes bear interest
at fixed rates ranging from 6.95% to 7.25% and require monthly interest and
principal payments over the life of the notes. The weighted average interest
rate and debt maturity at December 31, 1998 for these two mortgage notes were
7.12% and 27.5 years, respectively.
MEDIUM-TERM NOTES -- The Operating Partnership has established a program
for the sale of up to $95 million aggregate principal amount of Medium-Term
Notes due nine months or more from the date of issuance (the "MTN Program"). On
July 28, 1998, the Operating Partnership sold $30 million of notes under the
MTN Program. Such notes are due on July 30, 2001 and bear interest at 6.75% per
year. On October 5, 1998, the Operating Partnership sold $25 million of notes
under the MTN Program. Such notes are due on October 5, 2000 and bear interest
at 6.71% per year.
60
6. NOTES PAYABLE -- (Continued)
UNSECURED NOTES -- The unsecured notes consist of $25.0 million of notes
due 2002, $30.0 million of notes due 2003, $50.0 million of notes due 2004 and
$50.0 million of notes due 2007 (collectively, the "Unsecured Notes"). The
Unsecured Notes require semi-annual interest payments until the end of the
respective terms.
UNSECURED BANK NOTES -- The unsecured bank notes consist of a $16.0
million note due 2002 and a $15.0 million note due 2000 (collectively, the
"Unsecured Bank Notes"). The notes require quarterly interest only payments
until the end of the respective terms.
UNSECURED CREDIT FACILITY -- In March, 1998, the Operating Partnership
obtained a new syndicated unsecured line of credit (the "Unsecured Credit
Facility") in the amount of $175 million which replaced the existing $150
million credit facility. The Unsecured Credit Facility was increased in
December, 1998 to $200 million. The Unsecured Credit Facility provides funds
for new development, acquisitions and general working capital purposes. The
Unsecured Credit Facility has a three year term with two one-year extension
options and bears interest at LIBOR+90 basis points based upon the Operating
Partnership's current credit rating of BBB- by Standard & Poor's Rating
Services and Baa3 by Moody's Investors Service. The interest rate will be
reduced in the event of an upgrade of the Operating Partnership's unsecured
credit rating. The Unsecured Credit Facility is repayable monthly on an
interest only basis with principal due at maturity. The Operating Partnership's
credit facilities had an average interest rate and average balance outstanding
during the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 of 6.67%, 6.73%, 6.46%
and $98.0, $53.9 million and $9.4 million, respectively. In addition, the
maximum outstanding during 1998, 1997 and 1996 was $175.0 million, $121.9
million and $22.4 million, respectively.
The Unsecured Credit Facility also provides a bid option sub-facility
equal to a maximum of fifty percent of the total facility ($100 million). This
sub-facility provides the Operating Partnership with the option to place
borrowings in fixed LIBOR contract periods of thirty, sixty, ninety and one
hundred eighty days. The Operating Partnership may have up to seven fixed LIBOR
contracts outstanding at any one time. Upon proper notifications, all lenders
participating in the Unsecured Credit Facility may, but are not obligated to,
participate in a competitive bid auction for these fixed LIBOR contracts.
The Unsecured Credit Facility requires the Operating Partnership to comply
with certain affirmative and negative covenants including the following
requirements: (i) the Operating Partnership maintain its qualification as a
REIT; (ii) the Operating Partnership maintain a ratio of EBITDA (as defined
therein) to fixed charges (as defined therein) of not less that 1.75 to 1;
(iii) dividends not exceed 90% of funds from operations (as defined therein);
(iv) the Operating Partnership maintain a ratio of total funded debt (as
defined therein) to implied capitalization value (as defined therein) of less
than .55 to 1; and (v) the Operating Partnership maintain a ratio of
unencumbered asset value (as defined therein) to unsecured debt of less than
1.75 to 1. In addition, the Unsecured Notes and the Unsecured Bank Notes
require the Operating Partnership to comply with certain affirmative and
negative covenants including the following requirements: (i) the ratio of
unencumbered assets (as defined therein) to unsecured debt equal or exceed
150%; (ii) the ratio of debt to assets (as defined therein) not exceed 60%; and
(iii) secured debt not to exceed 40% of assets (as defined therein).
VARIABLE RATE TAX EXEMPT BONDS -- The effective interest rate of the
Variable Rate Tax Exempt Bonds was 4.85% for the year ended December 31, 1998.
These bonds bear interest at various rates set by a remarketing agent at the
demand note index plus 0.50%, set weekly, or the lowest percentage of prime
which allows the resale at a price of par. The bonds contain covenants which
require that the Operating Partnership lease or hold for lease 20% (or 25%
under certain state or local requirements) of the apartment homes for
moderate-income residents. The bonds require maintenance of letters of credit
or surety bonds (credit enhancements) aggregating to $52.9 million. The credit
enhancements on four of the five tax exempt bonds ($44.2 million of debt)
provide for a principal amortization schedule which approximates a 25-year term
during the term of the credit enhancement.
Real estate assets with a net book value of $433.5 million serve as
collateral for the various debt agreements.
61
6. NOTES PAYABLE -- (Continued)
The aggregate maturities of all debt for each of the years ending December
31 are as follows (in thousands):
FIXED RATE FIXED RATE FIXED RATE TAX EXEMPT UNSECURED
MORTGAGE MORTGAGE UNSECURED VARIABLE CREDIT
LOANS NOTES NOTES RATE BONDS FACILITY TOTAL
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ---------- -----------
1999 ........... $ 3,094 $ 2,006 $ -- $ 1,105 $ -- $ 6,205
2000 ........... 3,293 2,151 40,000 1,130 -- 46,574
2001 ........... 3,340 2,313 30,000 1,150 153,500 190,303
2002 ........... 3,532 10,517 41,000 1,270 -- 56,319
2003 ........... 3,779 2,517 30,000 1,290 -- 37,586
Thereafter ..... 138,172 105,087 100,000 45,857 -- 389,116
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------- --------
$155,210 $124,591 $241,000 $51,802 $153,500 $726,103
======== ======== ======== ======= ======== ========
EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS -- The extraordinary items in the year ended December
31, 1998 resulted from the write-off of deferred financing cost in conjunction
with the replacement by the Operating Partnership of its prior credit facility
with the Unsecured Credit Facility and prepayment penalties on six mortgage
notes which were repaid during the period. The 1996 extraordinary item resulted
from the write-off of deferred financing costs on development loans repaid with
the proceeds from the 1996 Offering and with the proceeds of the $31.0 million
Unsecured Bank Notes.
7. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
On April 1, 1996, the Operating Partnership acquired its joint venture
partner's interest in Summit Plantation (formerly Plantation Cove), a 262
apartment community located in Plantation, Florida. The Operating Partnership
paid $6.4 million in cash for the remaining 75% interest in the joint venture.
During the year ended December 31, 1997, the Operating Partnership
completed the acquisition of five Communities: Summit Portofino, purchased on
January 6, 1997; Summit Mayfaire, purchased on January 15, 1997; Summit Sand
Lake purchased on February 20, 1997; Summit Windsor II, purchased on July 18,
1997; and Summit Fair Oaks, purchased on December 31, 1997 (the "1997
Acquisitions"). The 1997 Acquisitions added a total of 1,434 apartment homes to
the Operating Partnership's portfolio. Total purchase price for the 1997
Acquisitions was $104.5 million which consisted of $15.2 million in assumed
debt, 243,608 units (valued at $4.9 million) issued to Summit Properties in
exchange for Summit Properties issuing 243,608 shares of Common Stock to the
seller, 194,495 Units (valued at $3.9 million) issued to the seller and $78.9
million of cash. Concurrently with the purchase of Summit Portofino, Summit
Properties sold 315,029 shares of Common Stock to the public for cash. Summit
Properties contributed the proceeds of these sales of Common Stock to the
Operating Partnership in exchange for Units. The proceeds were then use to fund
a portion of the purchase. The Summit Windsor II purchase was partially funded
by the proceeds from the sale of a property formerly know as Summit Charleston
in May, 1997. The property formerly known as Summit Charleston was sold for $9.5
million and a gain on the sale of approximately $4.4 million was recognized.
The Operating Partnership completed the acquisition of three communities
located in Atlanta, Georgia in 1998: Summit St. Clair, purchased effective
March 1, 1998; Summit Club at Dunwoody, purchased effective May 22, 1998; and
Summit at Lenox, purchased effective July 8, 1998 (the "Atlanta Acquisitions").
The Atlanta Acquisitions added a total of 1,092 apartment homes to the
Operating Partnership's portfolio at an aggregate purchase price of $88.3
million. The Atlanta Acquisitions were financed with the issuance of 259,871
Units (valued at $5.2 million) and the assumption of $8.8 million of mortgage
debt. The balance of the purchase price was paid in cash.
On May 18, 1998, the Operating Partnership sold a community in Brandon,
Florida formerly known as Summit Providence for net proceeds of $23.9 million.
A gain on the sale of $8.7 million was recognized. Proceeds from the sale were
used to partially fund the acquisition of Summit Club at Dunwoody.
On October 23, 1998, the Operating Partnership sold a community in
Atlanta, Georgia formerly known as Summit Springs for $17.5 million. The
Operating Partnership recognized a gain of approximately $6.0 million on the
sale.
On November 2, 1998, the Operating Partnership sold a community in Winston
Salem, North Carolina, formerly known as Summit Old Town, for $7.5 million. The
Operating Partnership recognized a gain of approximately $2.3 million from the
sale.
On November 4, 1998, the Operating Partnership acquired a portfolio of
multifamily properties in Texas (the "Ewing Portfolio") through a merger with
Ewing (as defined below), a private developer of luxury apartment homes. The
Ewing
62
7. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS -- (Continued)
Portfolio consists of 2,465 apartment homes in seven Communities located in
Dallas, Austin and San Antonio. The acquisition of the Ewing Portfolio was
effected pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of October
31, 1998 (the "Merger Agreement") among Summit Properties, affiliates of Summit
Properties including the Operating Partnership, Ewing Industries, Inc., an Ohio
corporation ("Ewing Industries"), affiliates of Ewing, and their respective
partners, shareholders and members (together with Ewing Industries, "Ewing").
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the acquisition was funded through (i) the
issuance of 1,008,988 Units to Summit Properties in exchange for Summit
Properties issuing 1,008,988 shares of Common Stock to Ewing and 141,921 Units
issued to Ewing, valued at $20.7 million in the aggregate, (ii) the assumption
of $84.0 million in long-term fixed-rate mortgage indebtedness, (iii) the
payment of $50.6 million in cash and (iv) receipt of $3.8 million of credit for
customary prorations and reserves. A portion of the consideration was deferred
until stabilization of one Community (Summit Las Palmas) which was in lease-up
at the time of the acquisition of the Ewing Portfolio. The Summit Las Palmas
purchase was closed on December 31, 1998 with the additional consideration of
(i) 1,065,627 shares of Common Stock and 36,629 Units valued at $19.8 million in
aggregate and (ii) cash in the amount of approximately $600,000.
On December 16, 1998, the Operating Partnership (i) sold five communities
(the "Sold Communities") to Hollow Creek, LLC., a newly-formed North Carolina
limited liability company for approximately $68 million and (ii) contributed
two communities with an approximate value of $22 million (together with the
Sold Communities, the "Joint Venture Communities") to Station Hill, LLC., a
newly-formed North Carolina limited liability company (the "LLC"). On the same
date, Hollow Creek, LLC contributed the Sold Communities to the LLC. The LLC is
a joint venture limited liability company, the membership of which is comprised
of the Operating Partnership and a wholly owned subsidiary of a major financial
services company (the "Joint Venture Member"). The disposition was effected
pursuant to a Real Estate Sale Agreement dated November 20, 1998 between the
Operating Partnership and the Joint Venture Member and pursuant to the
Operating Agreement of the LLC, also dated November 20, 1998. The Operating
Partnership's net contribution to the LLC (approximately $5.6 million)
represents a 25 percent equity interest in the LLC. In addition, the Operating
Partnership is the managing member of the LLC and will also retain management
of the Joint Venture Communities through a management agreement with the LLC.
The cash flow of the LLC will be distributed pro rata to each member based on
its equity contribution until certain economic benchmarks are achieved, at
which point the Operating Partnership will receive an escalated portion of the
cash flow and residual interest. The LLC has obtained five separate mortgages
totaling $70,150,000 from Fannie Mae. These mortgages have a ten-year maturity
and a 6.70% interest rate. The proceeds of the mortgages were distributed on a
pro rata basis to the LLC's two members. The Joint Venture Communities involved
in the transaction were Summit Green, Summit Hollow I and II and Summit Creek
in Charlotte, North Carolina; Summit Hill I and II in Raleigh, North Carolina;
and Summit Station in Tampa, Florida. The Joint Venture Communities include
1,433 apartment homes. The Operating Partnership recognized a gain of
approximately $20.2 million on the disposition. The gain is net of $5.6 million
elimination of gain relative to the Operating Partnership's retained portion of
the joint venture. The elimination of the gain reduced the Operating
Partnership's investment in the joint venture to zero at the initial joint
venture formation.
Proceeds from the sale of Summit Springs, Summit Old Town and the Sold
Communities were put in escrow with a qualified intermediary in accordance with
like-kind exchange income tax rules and regulations. These proceeds will be
used to fund future developments.
The following summary of selected unaudited pro forma results of
operations presents information as if the Atlanta Acquisitions and the Ewing
Portfolio purchase (except Summit Las Palmas) had occurred as of January 1,
1998 for the 1998 pro forma information. Pro forma information for 1998
excludes Las Palmas as it was in construction and lease-up and had
insignificant operations. Pro forma information for the year ended December 31,
1997 presents information as if the Summit Lenox and the Ewing Portfolio
acquisitions (except for Summit Las Palmas) had occurred as of January 1, 1997.
Pro forma information for 1997 has not been presented for Summit St. Clair,
Summit Club at Dunwoody and Summit Las Palmas as they were under construction
during the period and had insignificant operations.
63
7. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS -- (Continued)
The pro forma information for the year ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 is
provided for informational purposes only and is not indicative of results that
would have occurred or which may occur in the future (dollars in thousands
except per share amounts):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------
1998 1997
------------- -------------
Net revenues ................................ $ 166,308 $ 140,570
========= =========
Income before extraordinary items ........... $ 62,765 $ 27,032
========= =========
Net income .................................. $ 62,171 $ 27,032
========= =========
Earnings per unit:
Income before extraordinary items ......... $ 2.11 $ 0.97
========= =========
Net income ................................ $ 2.09 $ 0.97
========= =========
8. NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM EMPLOYEES
On September 8, 1997, the Board of Directors of Summit Properties approved
a Statement of Company Policy, which has subsequently been amended and restated
by the Board, on loans to executive officers and certain key employees relating
to purchases of Common Stock (the "Loan Program"). Pursuant to the Loan Program,
Summit Properties may lend amounts to certain of the Summit Properties'
executive officers and certain key employees of the Operating Partnership and
subsidiaries for one or more of the following purposes: (i) to finance the
purchase of Common Stock (a) by certain executive officers on the open market at
the then-current market prices and (b) by other eligible employees through
Summit Properties' 1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan; (ii) to
finance an executive officer's or key employee's payment of the exercise price
of one or more stock options to purchase shares of Common Stock granted to such
employees under Summit Properties' 1994 Stock Option and Incentive Plan; or
(iii) to finance the annual tax liability of certain executive officers related
to the vesting of shares of Common Stock which constitute a portion of a
restricted stock award granted to such employees under the 1994 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan. The maximum aggregate amount the Summit Properties may loan to
an executive officer is $500,000, unless otherwise determined on a case-by-case
basis by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee thereof, and the
maximum aggregate amount Summit Properties may loan to a qualified employee
other than executive officers is $100,000. Shares of Common Stock which are the
subject of a loan serve as collateral for the notes until the notes have been
paid in full. Each note bears interest at the applicable federal rate, as
established by the Internal Revenue Service, in effect on the date of the note.
The notes are payable through the application to the outstanding loan balance of
all dividends and distributions related to the collateral stock, first to
interest, with the remainder, if any, to outstanding principal. Each note
becomes due and payable in full on the tenth anniversary of the respective note.
As of December 31, 1998, Summit Properties had issued loans in the net amount of
$2,476,000.
9. COMMITMENTS
The estimated cost to complete nine development projects currently under
construction was approximately $82.3 million at December 31, 1998. Anticipated
construction completion dates of the projects range from the first quarter of
1999 to the second quarter of 2000.
64
9. COMMITMENTS -- (Continued)
The Operating Partnership rents office space in several locations. Rental
expense for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 amounted to
$121,000, $101,000 and $109,000, respectively ($406,000 in 1998, $347,000 in
1997 and $376,000 in 1996 including amounts recorded at the Management
Company). Future minimum rental payments for the next five years for those
operating leases (including the Management Company) that have initial or
remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows (in
thousands):
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31:
- --------------------------
1999 ................... $ 603
1998 ................... 310
2001 ................... 185
2002 ................... 100
2003 ................... 77
------
$1,275
======
10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
PROFIT SHARING PLAN
The employees of Summit Properties, the Operating Partnership and its
subsidiaries (the "Summit Employees") are participants in Summit Properties'
defined contribution plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code which covers all employees with one year or greater service. The Operating
Partnership's contributions are equal to one-half of each Summit Employees'
contribution up to a maximum of 3% of each employee's compensation. Aggregate
contributions of approximately $242,000, $217,000 and $223,000 were made for
the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively.
STOCK OPTION PLAN
In 1994, Summit Properties established the 1994 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan under which Summit Employees participate under the plan 1,000,000 shares of
Common Stock were reserved for issuance. Proceeds from the exercise of these
options are contributed to the Operating Partnership for a similar number of
Units. The plan provides that the option price shall not be less than the fair
market value of the shares at the date of grant. The options vest in three or
five annual installments on the anniversaries of the date of grant except for
shares granted to independent directors of the Summit Properties, which vest on
the date of grant.
A summary of changes in common stock options for the three years ended
December 31, 1998 is as follows:
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
OPTIONS EXERCISE PRICE
------------ -----------------
Outstanding at December 31, 1995 ..... 539,100 $ 18.64
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
Granted to employees ............... 28,000 19.30
Exercised .......................... (15,073) 19.04
Forfeited .......................... (53,381) 19.22
-------
Outstanding at December 31, 1996 .. 498,646 18.60
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
Exercised .......................... (45,900) 18.55
Forfeited .......................... (36,350) 17.74
-------
Outstanding at December 31, 1997 .. 416,396 18.86
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
Granted to employees ............... 191,000 19.19
Exercised .......................... (45,000) 19.00
Forfeited .......................... (15,000) 19.03
-------
Outstanding at December 31, 1998 .. 547,396 18.80
=======
Exercise prices for options outstanding as of December 31, 1998 ranged
from $17.13 to $20.75. The weighted average remaining contractual life of those
options is 6.9 years.
65
10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS -- (Continued)
As of December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 options to purchase 369,528,
359,218 and 283,228 shares, respectively, of Common Stock were exercisable. The
weighted average exercise price for the shares exercisable as of December 31,
1998, 1997 and 1996 was $18.84, $18.86 and $18.36, respectively.
The estimated weighted average fair value of options granted were $2.18
per share in 1998 and $2.10 per share in 1996 (none granted in 1997). Summit
Properties applies Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related
interpretations in accounting for its stock options. Accordingly, no
compensation cost has been recognized for its stock options. Had compensation
cost for Summit Properties' stock options been determined based on the fair
value at the grant dates, consistent with the method of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", the
Operating Partnership's net income and net income per share for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1996 would have changed to the pro forma amounts
indicated below (dollars in thousands except per share amounts):
1998 1996
------------ ----------
Pro forma net income ............................... $ 65,464 $20,501
Pro forma net income per share -- basic and diluted 2.24 .89
The fair value of options granted during 1998 were estimated on the date
of grant using the Binomial option-pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions: dividend yield of 9.3%, expected volatility of 20%, risk
free interest rate of 6.0%, and expected lives of ten years.
The fair value of options granted in 1996 were estimated on the date of
grant using the Binomial option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions: dividend yields ranging from 7.80% to 8.82%,
expected volatility of 16%, risk free interest rate of 6.52%, and expected
lives of ten years.
In addition, the plan provides for the issuance of stock grants to Summit
Employees. Summit Properties granted 8,372 shares of restricted stock under the
plan in 1998. The market value of the restricted stock totaled $162,000, which
was recorded as unamortized restricted stock compensation. Unearned
compensation is being amortized to expense over the five year vesting period.
Restricted stock of 26,528 shares with a market value of $546,000 were granted
in the year ended December 31, 1997. Restricted stock of 56,046 shares with a
market value of $1.0 million were granted in the year ended December 31, 1996.
The Operating Partnership recognized $314,000, $292,000 and $223,000 of expense
in the statement of earnings in the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively, relative to the stock grants.
PERFORMANCE STOCK AWARD PLAN
In January, 1998 Summit Properties agreed to award key Summit Employees
certain amounts of Common Stock under Summit Properties' Performance Stock Award
Plan. The amount of Common Stock to be granted to the key Summit Employees is
based upon Summit Properties' average annual return (share appreciation and
distributions) from the date of the award to the third anniversary of the award.
The number of shares to be granted under the performance Stock Award Plan ranges
from none (in the event Summit Properties achieves less than a 11% average
annual return) to 147,713 (in the event Summit Properties achieves a 15% or
greater annual return). The starting Common Stock price for the purposes of
calculating appreciation was $21.375 (fair market value at date of award).
Summit Properties' stock price at the end of the year is below the starting
price for calculating the number of grants, accordingly, no compensation cost
was recognized in 1998.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
In 1996, Summit Properties established a non-qualified employee stock
purchase plan. The plan allows Summit Employees to purchase up to $100,000
(with certain executive officers limited to $25,000) per year of the Common
Stock. The price of the shares of the Common Stock purchased will be the lesser
of 85 percent of the closing price of such shares either on (a) the first day
of each six month purchase period, or (b) the last day of each six month
purchase period. Total shares issued under the plan in 1998, 1997 and 1996 were
65,541, 62,117 and 44,362 with a market value of $1.3 million, $1.3 million and
$871,000, respectively. An additional 65,730 shares with a market value of $1.1
million were issued in January, 1999 under the plan. The Operating Partnership
recognized $203,000, $265,000 and $151,000 of expense in the statement of
earnings in the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, respectively,
relative to the employee stock purchase plan.
66
11. DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT AND DIRECT STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
In November 1997, Summit Properties replaced its existing dividend
reinvestment plan with a new dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase
plan (the "Plan"). The Plan provides both new investors and existing
shareholders of Summit Properties' stock (including Common Stock and other
classes of outstanding stock) with a method to purchase shares of Common Stock
under the Stock Purchase Program of the Plan. The Plan also permits
shareholders to designate all, a portion or none of the cash dividends on their
newly purchased Common Stock and cash dividends on their existing stock for
reinvestment in more shares of Common Stock through the Dividend Reinvestment
Program of the Plan. With respect to reinvested dividends and optional cash
payments, shares of Common Stock will be purchased for the Plan at a discount
ranging from 0% to 5% (established by Summit Properties from time to time) from
the market price, as more fully described in the Prospectus relating to the
Plan. Common Stock will be purchased by the Plan's Agent (First Union National
Bank) directly from Summit Properties or in open market or privately negotiated
transactions, as determined from time to time by Summit Properties, to fulfill
requirements for the Plan. At present, Summit Properties expects that shares
usually will be purchased directly from Summit Properties. All proceeds from
the Plan are contributed to the Operating Partnership in exchange for Units. On
December 31, 1998 and 1997, Summit Properties received $9.5 million and $6.5
million under the plan for Units to be issued January 2, 1999 and 1998,
respectively. These proceeds are included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses at December 31, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
12. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Effective December 31, 1998, the Operating Partnership adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 131, Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information (FAS 131). FAS 131 established
standards for the way public enterprises report information about operating
segments in annual financial statements. FAS 131 also established standards for
related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major
customers. The adoption of FAS 131 did not affect the Operating Partnership's
results of operations or financial position.
The Operating Partnership develops and operates luxury garden apartments.
The Operating Partnership only develops apartments for its own use with no
development work done for outside third parties. In addition, all the
apartments the Operating Partnership operates are considered "Class A"
apartments. Accordingly, there are no product or industry segments within the
Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership uses Funds from Operations
("FFO") as a performance measure. The Operating Partnership computes FFO in
accordance with the definition approved by the National Association of Real
Estate Investments Trusts. Information for the apartment communities is
summarized below:
1998 1997
------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------
Apartment Corporate/ Apartment Corporate/
Operations Other Total Operations Other Total
-------------- ------------ -------------- ------------ ------------ -----------
Rental and other
property income $ 145,656 $ -- $ 145,656 $ 116,006 $ -- $ 116,006
Interest and other income -- 1,913 1,913 -- 671 671
---------- -------- ---------- --------- -------- ---------
Total income 145,656 1,913 147,569 116,006 671 116,677
Property operating expense 51,550 -- 51,550 42,032 -- 42,032
Interest -- 33,506 33,506 -- 21,959 21,959
General and administrative -- 3,861 3,861 -- 2,740 2,740
Depreciation -- other -- 82 82 -- 19 19
(Income) loss on equity
investments -- 328 328 -- (274) (274)
---------- -------- ---------- --------- -------- ---------
Total operating expenses 51,550 37,777 89,327 42,032 24,444 66,476
Funds from Operations 94,106 (35,864) 58,242 73,974 (23,773) 50,201
Depreciation -- apartments (28,915) -- (28,915) (22,633) -- (22,633)
Gain on sale of assets 37,148 -- 37,148 4,366 -- 4,366
Extraordinary items -- (594) (594) -- -- --
---------- -------- ---------- --------- -------- ---------
Net income $ 102,339 ($ 36,458) $ 65,881 $ 55,707 ($ 23,773) $ 31,934
========== ======== ========== ========= ======== =========
Capital investment (1) $ 407,190 $ 300 $ 407,490 $ 215,390 $ 100 $ 215,490
========== ======== ========== ========= ======== =========
Assets $1,196,139 $ 2,928 $1,199,067 $ 822,872 $ 2,823 $ 825,695
========== ======== ========== ========= ======== =========
1996
---------------------------------------
Apartment Corporate/
Operations Other Total
------------ ------------- ------------
Rental and other
property income $ 93,547 $ -- $ 93,547
Interest and other income -- 942 942
--------- -------- ---------
Total income 93,547 942 94,489
Property operating expense 35,226 -- 35,226
Interest -- 17,138 17,138
General and administrative -- 2,557 2,557
Depreciation -- other -- 4 4
(Income) loss on equity
investments -- 173 173
--------- -------- ---------
Total operating expenses 35,226 19,872 55,098
Funds from Operations 58,321 (18,930) 39,391
Depreciation -- apartments (18,204) -- (18,204)
Gain on sale of assets -- -- --
Extraordinary items -- (626) (626)
--------- -------- ---------
Net income $ 40,117 ($ 19,556) $ 20,561
========= ======== =========
Capital investment (1) $ 120,507 $ 4 $ 120,511
========= ======== =========
Assets $ 633,566 $ 1,798 $ 635,364
========= ======== =========
(1) Capital investment includes costs during the year of the Operating
Partnership's developments and acquisitions as well as capital
expenditures on existing properties.
67
13. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Non-cash investing and financing activities for the years ended December
31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 are as follows:
A. The Operating Partnership purchased the Atlanta Acquisitions and the
Ewing Portfolio by issuing 2.5 million Units, assuming mortgage notes,
assuming certain liabilities and the payment of cash. The recording of
the purchases is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Fixed Assets ........................ $ 267,991
Restricted Cash ..................... 1,713
Current liabilities assumed ......... (6,327)
Mortgage notes assumed .............. (92,761)
Value of Units issued ............... (45,770)
---------
Cash invested ....................... $ 124,846
=========
B. The Operating Partnership disposed of eight communities during 1998 for
net proceeds of approximately $130.6 million. $116.5 million of the
sales proceeds were deposited with a qualified intermediary in
accordance with like-kind exchange income tax rules and regulations. Of
the proceeds, $17.6 million was used to fund the acquisition of an
apartment community, while an additional $12.6 million was used to
purchase land and fund certain development projects. The remaining
$86.3 million held by the qualified intermediary is shown in the
balance sheet caption "Restricted Cash" and will be used to fund the
acquisition of other like-kind property.
C. In the year ended December 31, 1997, the Operating Partnership
purchased five apartment communities (Summit Mayfaire, Summit
Portofino, Summit Sand Lake, Summit Windsor II and Summit Fair Oaks).
The Operating Partnership completed the purchase of the five apartment
communities by assuming debt, issuing 438,103 Units, assuming certain
liabilities and current assets, and the payment of cash. The recording
of the purchases is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Fixed Assets ........................ $ 104,469
Current Assets ...................... 30
Debt Assumed ........................ (15,226)
Current liabilities assumed ......... (1,531)
Value of Units issued ............... (8,872)
---------
Cash invested ....................... $ 78,870
=========
D. On April 1, 1996, the Operating Partnership acquired its joint venture
partner's interest in the Summit Plantation (formerly Plantation Cove)
apartment community. The Operating Partnership paid $6.4 million in
cash for the remaining 75% interest in this joint venture, which is now
owned entirely by the Operating Partnership. The recording of the
purchase is summarized as follows (in thousands):
Fixed assets ........................ $ 21,913
Current assets ...................... 202
Deferred charges .................... 95
Debt assumed ........................ (14,347)
Current liabilities assumed ......... (288)
Minority interest ................... (1,215)
---------
Net cash paid ....................... $ 6,360
=========
E. Summit Properties issued 8,372, 26,528 and 52,086 (net of 3,960 shares
retired) of restricted stock grants in 1998, 1997 and 1996 valued at
$162,000, $546,000 and $1.0 million, respectively, to Summit Employees.
F. The Operating Partnership accrued a distribution payable of $12.7
million, $11.0 million and $10.2 million at December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, respectively.
G. The Operating Partnership issued 106,330 Units of the Operating
Partnership, valued at $2.1 million at issuance, for the purchase of
land in 1996.
68
14. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURE AND MARKET RISK OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following disclosures of estimated fair value were determined by
management using available market information and appropriate valuation
methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market
data and develop the related estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the
estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that
could be realized upon disposition of the financial instruments. The use of
different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a
material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Cash and cash equivalents, rents receivable, accounts payable, accrued
expenses, security deposits, other liabilities, tax-exempt bond indebtedness
and the credit facility are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate
their fair values at December 31, 1998 and 1997.
Fixed rate mortgage debt and fixed rate unsecured notes with a carrying
value of $520.9 million have an estimated aggregate fair value of approximately
$521.0 million at December 31, 1998. Fixed rate mortgage debt and unsecured
notes with a carrying value of $400 million have an estimated aggregate fair
value of approximately $399.4 at December 31, 1997. Rates currently available
to the Operating Partnership for debt with similar terms and maturities were
used to estimate the fair value of this debt.
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on information
available to management as of December 31, 1998 and 1997. Although management
is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair
value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively re-valued for
purposes of these financial statements since that date, and current estimates
of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
The fair market value of long-term fixed rate debt is subject to changes
in interest rates. Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt
will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The
estimated fair value of the Operating Partnership's total fixed rate long-term
debt at December 31, 1998 was $521.0 million. A 1% increase from prevailing
interest rates at December 31, 1998 would result in a decrease in fair value of
long-term debt by approximately $25.7 million. Fair values were determined from
quoted market prices, where available, and from information received from
investment advisors using current interest rates considering credit ratings and
remaining terms to maturity.
15. GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION
The Operating Partnership's completed apartment communities are
concentrated in four major regions as follows:
NUMBER OF APARTMENT 1998
APARTMENT HOMES -- % % OF
MARKET HOMES OF PORTFOLIO REVENUES
- ----------------------------------------------- ----------- -------------- ---------
I-85 Corridor (Raleigh, NC to Atlanta, GA) 6,493 37% 36%
Central/South Florida ..................... 4,249 24% 30%
Washington, DC/Virginia ................... 3,405 19% 23%
Texas ..................................... 2,017 12% 2%
Other ..................................... 1,389 8% 9%
----- --- ---
17,553 100% 100%
====== === ===
The above table does not include Summit Las Palmas (448 apartment homes),
which was acquired on December 31, 1998 and therefore had no rental operations.
In addition, the properties in Texas were acquired in the fourth quarter of
1998.
16. INCOME TAXES
Financial Accounting Standard No. 109, "Accounting for Income taxes"
requires a public enterprise to disclose the aggregate difference in the basis
of its net assets for financial and tax reporting purposes. The carrying value
reported in the Operating Partnerships' financial statements exceeded the tax
basis by approximately $90.6 million and $25.3 million, as of December 31, 1998
and 1997, respectively. The change between December 31, 1998 and 1997 was
primarily due to financial depreciation exceeding tax depreciation by
approximately $7.8 million, offset by the financial reporting basis exceeding
the tax basis by $69.9 million for the Operating Partnership's 1998
acquisitions and certain property improvements.
69
16. INCOME TAXES -- (Continued)
A reconciliation of net income as reported for financial and tax reporting
purposes for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 is as follows (in
thousands):
1998 1997 1996
------------ ---------- ----------
Net income for financial reporting purposes ..................... $ 65,881 $ 31,934 $20,561
Excess of financial reporting depreciation over tax depreciation 7,806 6,122 5,749
Gain on sale of property ........................................ (37,148) (4,365) --
Basis difference in property improvements ....................... 66 (957) 260
Other ........................................................... 677 (959) (426)
--------- -------- -------
Taxable income of the Operating Partnership ..................... $ 37,282 $ 31,775 $26,144
========= ======== =======
17. REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
Real estate and accumulated depreciation by apartment community consisted
of the following at December 31, 1998 (dollars in thousands):
GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH
INITIAL COSTS CARRIED AT CLOSE OF PERIOD
---------------------------- COSTS ---------------------------------------
CAPITALIZED
BUILDINGS SUBSEQUENT BUILDINGS
RELATED AND TO AND
APARTMENTS ENCUMBRANCES LAND IMPROVEMENTS(6) ACQUISITION LAND IMPROVEMENTS(6) TOTAL(1)
- ------------------------- --------------- ---------- ----------------- ------------ ---------- ----------------- ----------
Summit Arbors ........... $ 780 $ 5,066 $ 342 $ 780 $ 5,408 $ 6,188
Summit Aventura ......... 6,367 25,291 6,368 25,289 31,658
Summit Ballantyne I ..... 2,060 14,431 2,064 14,427 16,491
Summit Ballantyne II .... 1,268 8,974 1,268 8,974 10,242
Summit Beacon Ridge ..... 1,053 5,912 1,154 5,811 6,965
Summit Belcourt ......... $9,708 3,600 16,778 3,600 16,778 20,378
Summit Belmont .......... (4) 974 11,159 984 11,149 12,133
Summit Blue Ash ......... (2) 2,033 11,882 2,169 11,746 13,915
Summit Breckenridge ..... 812 12,188 812 12,188 13,000
Summit Buena Vista ...... 25,779 4,670 30,499 1 4,670 30,500 35,170
Summit Camino Real ...... 3,640 22,210 3,640 22,210 25,850
Summit Club @ Dunwoody... 2,934 24,510 4 2,934 24,510 27,444
Summit Creekside ........ 414 3,614 464 414 4,077 4,492
Summit Crossing ......... 4,106 768 5,174 313 768 5,487 6,255
Summit Del Ray .......... (2) 3,120 14,987 5,402 12,705 18,107
Summit East Ridge ....... 5,042 900 6,303 325 910 6,618 7,528
Summit Eastchester ...... 912 4,699 350 912 5,048 5,961
Summit Fair Oaks ........ 4,356 17,215 37 4,356 17,252 21,608
Summit Fairview ......... 404 5,044 537 4,911 5,448
Summit Fairways ......... 2,819 15,164 2,819 15,164 17,982
Summit Foxcroft ......... 2,663 925 3,797 516 925 4,312 5,238
Summit Gateway .......... (4) 1,738 10,570 2,256 10,051 12,308
Summit Glen ............. (2) 3,652 12,955 3,693 12,915 16,607
Summit Hampton .......... (4) 2,577 13,480 2,972 13,085 16,057
Summit Heron's Run ...... (2) 3,154 10,864 3,192 10,827 14,018
Summit Highland ......... (2) 1,374 6,319 1,374 6,319 7,693
Summit Lake ............. 1,712 18,477 1,712 18,477 20,189
Summit Las Palmas ....... 4,480 25,504 4,480 25,504 29,984
Summit Lenox ............ 10,800 22,997 69 10,800 23,066 33,866
Summit Lofts ............ 1,800 7,337 748 1,800 8,085 9,885
Summit Los Arboles ...... 20,240 4,080 24,403 1 4,080 24,404 28,484
Summit Mayfaire ......... 936 8,897 21 936 8,918 9,854
Summit McIntosh ......... 1,862 10,258 1,943 10,177 12,120
Summit Meadow ........... (2) 2,313 8,592 2,539 8,366 10,905
Summit New Albany ....... 2,693 21,649 2,693 21,649 24,342
Summit Norcroft I ....... (2) 1,072 7,417 1,253 7,236 8,489
Summit Norcroft II ...... 381 3,125 381 3,125 3,506
Summit Oak .............. 2,519 400 3,065 127 400 3,192 3,592
Summit On the River ..... 3,212 20,994 3,212 20,993 24,206
Summit Palm Lake ........ (2) 4,949 16,930 5,084 16,795 21,879
Summit Park ............. 1,680 11,176 1,921 10,934 12,856
DEPRECIABLE
ACCUMULATED DATE OF DATE LIVES
APARTMENTS DEPRECIATION CONSTRUCTION ACQUIRED YEARS
- ------------------------- -------------- -------------- ---------- ------------
Summit Arbors ........... $ (776) 1986(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit Aventura ......... (2,638) 6/94-12/95 12/93 5-40 years
Summit Ballantyne I ..... (624) 7/96 12/97 12/95 5-40 years
Summit Ballantyne II .... (106) 8/97 12/98 12/95 5-40 years
Summit Beacon Ridge ..... (2,081) 1/88-7/88 1/88 5-40 years
Summit Belcourt ......... (88) 1994(5) 11/98 5-40 years
Summit Belmont .......... (4,282) 1/86-5/87 1/86 5-40 years
Summit Blue Ash ......... (2,789) 1/92-5/92 1/91 5-40 years
Summit Breckenridge ..... (4,732) 7/85-5/87 6/85 5-40 years
Summit Buena Vista ...... (161) 1996(5) 11/98 5-40 years
Summit Camino Real ...... (117) 1998(5) 11/98 5-40 years
Summit Club @ Dunwoody... (456) 1997(5) 5/98 5-40 years
Summit Creekside ........ (625) 1981(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit Crossing ......... (823) 1985(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit Del Ray .......... (3,050) 1/92-2/93 1/92 5-40 years
Summit East Ridge ....... (963) 1986(5) 6/95 5-40 years
Summit Eastchester ...... (852) 1981(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit Fair Oaks ........ (660) 1990(5) 12/97 5-40 years
Summit Fairview ......... (2,216) 3/82-3/83 3/82 5-40 years
Summit Fairways ......... (1,165) 9/95-12/96 8/95 5-40 years
Summit Foxcroft ......... (699) 1979(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit Gateway .......... (3,606) 1/86-1/87 12/85 5-40 years
Summit Glen ............. (3,003) 5/90-8/92 4/90 5-40 years
Summit Hampton .......... (5,026) 11/86-3/88 10/86 5-40 years
Summit Heron's Run ...... (3,147) 7/89-10/90 6/89 5-40 years
Summit Highland ......... (2,637) 3/86-1/87 11/85 5-40 years
Summit Lake ............. (548) 9/96-5/98 4/96 5-40 years
Summit Las Palmas ....... 1998(5) 12/98 5-40 years
Summit Lenox ............ (430) 1965(5) 7/98 5-40 years
Summit Lofts ............ (1,724) 1990(5) 10/94 5-40 years
Summit Los Arboles ...... (135) 1996(5) 11/98 5-40 years
Summit Mayfaire ......... (586) 1995(5) 1/97 5-40 years
Summit McIntosh ......... (3,185) 7/89-6/90 1/89 5-40 years
Summit Meadow ........... (2,571) 8/89-8/90 2/89 5-40 years
Summit New Albany ....... (149) 5/97-12/98 11/96 5-40 years
Summit Norcroft I ....... (2,063) 2/90-3/91 12/89 5-40 years
Summit Norcroft II ...... (110) 3/97-11/97 8/96 5-40 years
Summit Oak .............. (502) 1982(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit On the River ..... (1,382) 8/95-6/97 10/94 5-40 years
Summit Palm Lake ........ (4,419) 3/90-2/92 1/90 5-40 years
Summit Park ............. (3,706) 4/88-4/89 1/88 5-40 years
70
17. REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION -- (Continued)
INITIAL COSTS
----------------------------- COSTS
CAPITALIZED
BUILDINGS SUBSEQUENT
RELATED AND TO
APARTMENTS ENCUMBRANCES LAND IMPROVEMENTS(6) ACQUISITION
- --------------------------- --------------- ----------- ----------------- ------------
Summit Perico ............. (2) 1,588 12,126
Summit Pike Creek ......... (4) 1,132 12,522
Summit Plantation ......... 3,428 18,485 40
Summit Plantation II ...... 4,012 17,239
Summit Portofino .......... 3,864 24,504 233
Summit Radbourne .......... 8,507 1,395 12,607 649
Summit Reston ............. 5,434 26,255 573
Summit River Crossing ..... 2,562 16,736
Summit Russett ............ 3,995 19,223
Summit Sand Lake .......... 14,679 4,160 22,979 145
Summit Sedgebrook ......... 1,696 14,735
Summit Sherwood ........... 3,274 1,102 4,863 152
Summit Simsbury ........... (3) 650 4,570 406
Summit Square ............. (2) 2,757 15,683
Summit St. Clair .......... (2) 3,024 24,040 7
Summit Stonefield ......... 3,541 16,160
Summit Stony Point ........ (4) 1,638 13,041 464
Summit Touchstone ......... (3) 766 5,568 307
Summit Turtle Cove ........ 17,073 3,480 19,775
Summit Turtle Rock ........ 11,001 2,500 14,074 1
Summit Village ............ (2) 3,212 14,142
Summit Walk ............... 568 237 5,534
Summit Waterford .......... (2) 1,568 14,459
Summit Windsor I .......... (2) 644 6,627
Summit Windsor II ......... (2) 3,060 14,497 111
----- ------ ------
Total ..................... $161,450 $437,564 $469,427
======== ======== ========
GROSS AMOUNT AT WHICH
CARRIED AT CLOSE OF PERIOD
-------------------------------------------
BUILDINGS DEPRECIABLE
AND ACCUMULATED DATE OF DATE LIVES
APARTMENTS LAND IMPROVEMENTS(6) TOTAL(1) DEPRECIATION CONSTRUCTION ACQUIRED YEARS
- --------------------------- ----------- ----------------- ------------- -------------- ---------------- ---------- ------------
Summit Perico ............. 2,174 11,540 13,714 (3,479) 1/89-2/90 8/88 5-40 years
Summit Pike Creek ......... 1,259 12,395 13,654 (4,073) 11/86-2/88 4/86 5-40 years
Summit Plantation ......... 3,428 18,525 21,953 (1,623) 1/94-7/95 4/96 5-40 years
Summit Plantation II ...... 4,012 17,239 21,251 (686) 10/96-11/97 9/96 5-40 years
Summit Portofino .......... 3,864 24,737 28,601 (1,559) 1995(5) 1/97 5-40 years
Summit Radbourne .......... 1,395 13,256 14,651 (1,565) 1991(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit Reston ............. 5,434 26,828 32,262 (1,977) 1987(5) 4/94 5-40 years
Summit River Crossing ..... 2,636 16,661 19,297 (1,514) 3/95-9/96 10/94 5-40 years
Summit Russett ............ 3,995 19,223 23,218 (989) 7/95-9/97 11/94 5-40 years
Summit Sand Lake .......... 4,160 23,124 27,284 (1,584) 1995(5) 2/97 5-40 years
Summit Sedgebrook ......... 1,719 14,712 16,431 (543) 6/96-12/97 1/96 5-40 years
Summit Sherwood ........... 1,106 5,011 6,117 (836) 1968(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit Simsbury ........... 650 4,976 5,626 (724) 1985(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit Square ............. 3,775 14,665 18,440 (4,063) 3/89-8/90 2/89 5-40 years
Summit St. Clair .......... 3,024 24,048 27,071 (621) 1997(5) 3/98 5-40 years
Summit Stonefield ......... 3,541 16,161 19,701 (618) 6/96-3/98 3/96 5-40 years
Summit Stony Point ........ 1,638 13,504 15,143 (2,756) 1986(5) 2/94 5-40 years
Summit Touchstone ......... 766 5,875 6,641 (855) 1986(5) 5/95 5-40 years
Summit Turtle Cove ........ 3,480 19,775 23,255 (108) 1996(5) 11/98 5-40 years
Summit Turtle Rock ........ 2,500 14,075 16,575 (80) 1995(5) 11/98 5-40 years
Summit Village ............ 3,653 13,701 17,354 (3,891) 9/89-1/91 8/89 5-40 years
Summit Walk ............... 983 5,356 6,339 (1,053) 4/92-2/93 4/92 5-40 years
Summit Waterford .......... 1,949 14,078 16,027 (4,241) 1/89-6/90 11/88 5-40 years
Summit Windsor I .......... 969 6,302 7,271 (2,071) 8/88-8/89 3/95 5-40 years
Summit Windsor II ......... 3,060 14,608 17,668 (851) 1988(5) 7/97 5-40 years
----- ------ ------ ------
Total ..................... $169,374 $899,058 $1,068,435 $ (114,196)
======== ======== ========== ==========
- ---------
(1) The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 1998 is
$ 944.9 million.
(2) Encumbered by fixed rate mortgages of $146.7 million.
(3) Encumbered by fixed rate mortgage of $8.5 million.
(4) Collateral for $52.9 million of letters of credit which serve as collateral
for $51.8 million in tax exempt bonds.
(5) Property purchased by Operating Partnership. Date reflects date
construction completed.
(6) Includes furniture, fixtures and equipment.
A summary of activity for real estate assets and accumulated depreciation
is as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------
1998 1997 1996
-------------- ------------ -----------
REAL ESTATE ASSETS (1):
Balance at beginning of year ......... $ 830,068 $618,102 $524,772
---------- -------- --------
Acquisitions ......................... 267,991 104,469 21,913
Improvements ......................... 9,804 9,823 4,780
Developments ......................... 74,559 104,897 66,637
Disposition of property .............. (113,987) (7,223) --
---------- -------- --------
238,367 211,966 93,330
---------- -------- --------
Balance at end of year ............... $1,068,435 $830,068 $618,102
========== ======== ========
ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (1):
Balance at beginning of year ......... $ 105,313 $ 85,031 $ 66,978
Depreciation ......................... 28,733 22,610 18,053
Disposition of property .............. (19,850) (2,328) --
---------- -------- --------
Balance at end of year ............... $ 114,196 $105,313 $ 85,031
========== ======== ========
(1) Includes only apartment communities and does not include fixed assets used
in property development, construction and management of apartment
communities.
71
18. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
Quarterly financial information for the years 1998 and 1997 are as follows
(in thousands except per unit data):
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
-----------------------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
---------- ------------ ------------ ----------
Revenues .............................................. $33,239 $ 34,571 $ 38,256 $41,503
Income before gain on sale of real estate assets and
extraordinary items .................................. 6,892 7,137 7,892 7,406
Gain on sale of real estate assets .................... -- 8,731 -- 28,417
Extraordinary items ................................... (185) -- -- (409)
Net income ............................................ 6,707 15,868 7,892 35,414
Income per unit:
Income before extraordinary items -- basic ........... 0.25 0.55 0.27 1.19
Income before extraordinary items -- diluted ......... 0.24 0.55 0.27 1.19
Net income -- basic and diluted ...................... 0.24 0.55 0.27 1.17
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
---------------------------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
Revenues ........................................ $ 27,249 $ 28,103 $ 30,068 $ 31,257
Income before gain on sale of real estate assets 6,928 6,856 6,948 6,836
Gain on sale of real estate assets .............. -- 4,366 -- --
Net income ...................................... 6,928 11,222 6,948 6,836
Net income per unit -- basic and diluted ....... 0.26 0.41 0.25 0.25
72