Delaware |
56-1574463 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
Number) |
COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE |
18,107,597 SHARES | |
(Class) |
(Outstanding at January 27, 2003) |
Page | ||
Part IFinancial Information |
||
3 | ||
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 | ||
16 | ||
28 | ||
29 | ||
Part IIOther Information |
||
30 | ||
S-1 |
December 26, 2002 |
September 26, 2002 |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
21,596 |
|
$ |
42,236 |
| ||
Receivables, net |
|
34,168 |
|
|
34,316 |
| ||
Inventories (Note 2) |
|
79,709 |
|
|
84,437 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses |
|
4,419 |
|
|
3,499 |
| ||
Property held for sale |
|
838 |
|
|
388 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
863 |
|
|
1,414 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total current assets |
|
141,593 |
|
|
166,290 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Property and equipment, net (Note 6) |
|
425,086 |
|
|
435,518 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
|
277,874 |
|
|
277,874 |
| ||
Deferred financing cost, net |
|
8,426 |
|
|
8,965 |
| ||
Environmental receivables (Note 3) |
|
11,696 |
|
|
11,696 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
9,037 |
|
|
9,355 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total other assets |
|
307,033 |
|
|
307,890 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total assets |
$ |
873,712 |
|
$ |
909,698 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt (Note 4) |
$ |
42,913 |
|
$ |
43,255 |
| ||
Current maturities of capital lease obligations |
|
1,521 |
|
|
1,521 |
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
80,328 |
|
|
93,858 |
| ||
Accrued interest |
|
6,515 |
|
|
13,175 |
| ||
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
7,932 |
|
|
10,785 |
| ||
Income taxes payable |
|
46 |
|
|
|
| ||
Other accrued taxes |
|
11,097 |
|
|
17,463 |
| ||
Accrued insurance |
|
10,420 |
|
|
9,687 |
| ||
Other accrued liabilities (Note 5) |
|
13,847 |
|
|
19,969 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total current liabilities |
|
174,619 |
|
|
209,713 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Long-term debt (Note 4) |
|
451,086 |
|
|
460,920 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other liabilities: |
||||||||
Environmental reserves (Note 3) |
|
13,232 |
|
|
13,285 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes (Note 6) |
|
39,264 |
|
|
38,360 |
| ||
Deferred revenue |
|
48,842 |
|
|
51,772 |
| ||
Capital lease obligations |
|
15,046 |
|
|
15,381 |
| ||
Other noncurrent liabilities (Notes 5 and 6) |
|
13,879 |
|
|
5,063 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total other liabilities |
|
130,263 |
|
|
123,861 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3 and 4) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity (Notes 5, 8 and 9): |
||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,107,597 issued and outstanding at December 26, 2002 and
September 26, 2002 |
|
182 |
|
|
182 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
128,002 |
|
|
128,002 |
| ||
Shareholder loans |
|
(483 |
) |
|
(708 |
) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive deficit, net |
|
(1,235 |
) |
|
(2,112 |
) | ||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(8,722 |
) |
|
(10,160 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total shareholders equity |
|
117,744 |
|
|
115,204 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ |
873,712 |
|
$ |
909,698 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
December 26, 2002 |
December 27, 2001 |
|||||||
(13 weeks) |
(13 weeks) |
|||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Merchandise sales |
$ |
242,340 |
|
$ |
237,238 |
| ||
Gasoline sales |
|
401,933 |
|
|
334,313 |
| ||
Commissions |
|
6,704 |
|
|
5,822 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total revenues |
|
650,977 |
|
|
577,373 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cost of sales: |
||||||||
Merchandise |
|
162,567 |
|
|
159,925 |
| ||
Gasoline |
|
362,419 |
|
|
301,969 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total cost of sales |
|
524,986 |
|
|
461,894 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Gross profit |
|
125,991 |
|
|
115,479 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Operating, general and administrative expenses |
|
93,141 |
|
|
88,976 |
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
13,092 |
|
|
13,392 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total operating expenses |
|
106,233 |
|
|
102,368 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income from operations |
|
19,758 |
|
|
13,111 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest expense (Note 7) |
|
(12,188 |
) |
|
(12,343 |
) | ||
Miscellaneous |
|
434 |
|
|
25 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total other expense |
|
(11,754 |
) |
|
(12,318 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income before income taxes |
|
8,004 |
|
|
793 |
| ||
Income tax expense |
|
(3,084 |
) |
|
(318 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income before cumulative effect adjustment |
|
4,920 |
|
|
475 |
| ||
Cumulative effect adjustment, net of tax (Note 6) |
|
(3,482 |
) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income |
$ |
1,438 |
|
$ |
475 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Earnings per share (Note 9): |
||||||||
Basic |
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
| ||
Diluted |
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
THE PANTRY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
December 26, 2002 |
December 27, 2001 |
|||||||
(13 weeks) |
(13 weeks) |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ |
1,438 |
|
$ |
475 |
| ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
13,092 |
|
|
13,392 |
| ||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
3,084 |
|
|
317 |
| ||
Loss on sale of property and equipment |
|
202 |
|
|
92 |
| ||
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
75 |
|
|
|
| ||
Fair market value change in non-qualifying derivatives |
|
(219 |
) |
|
(235 |
) | ||
Provision for closed stores |
|
642 |
|
|
40 |
| ||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principal |
|
3,482 |
|
|
|
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
||||||||
Receivables |
|
180 |
|
|
1,151 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
4,728 |
|
|
7,538 |
| ||
Prepaid expenses |
|
(920 |
) |
|
(757 |
) | ||
Other noncurrent assets |
|
134 |
|
|
40 |
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
13,530 |
|
|
(14,162 |
) | ||
Other current liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
(19,575 |
) |
|
(20,509 |
) | ||
Reserves for environmental expenses |
|
(53 |
) |
|
141 |
| ||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
(2,817 |
) |
|
(2,184 |
) | ||
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(10,057 |
) |
|
(14,661 |
) | ||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Additions to property held for sale |
|
(482 |
) |
|
(230 |
) | ||
Additions to property and equipment |
|
(2,400 |
) |
|
(2,802 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sale of property held for sale |
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
1,437 |
|
|
729 |
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(259 |
) |
|
(2,303 |
) | ||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Principal repayments under capital leases |
|
(335 |
) |
|
(239 |
) | ||
Principal repayments of long-term debt |
|
(10,176 |
) |
|
(18,676 |
) | ||
Repayments of shareholder loans |
|
225 |
|
|
10 |
| ||
Other financing costs |
|
(38 |
) |
|
(891 |
) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(10,324 |
) |
|
(19,796 |
) | ||
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(20,640 |
) |
|
(36,760 |
) | ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
42,236 |
|
|
50,611 |
| ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ |
21,596 |
|
$ |
13,851 |
| ||
Cash paid (refunded) during the period: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ |
18,629 |
|
$ |
17,932 |
| ||
Taxes |
$ |
(46 |
) |
$ |
(66 |
) | ||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
THE PANTRY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS No. 143), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 requires us to recognize an estimated liability associated with the removal of our underground storage tanks. See Note 6 for a discussion of our adoption of SFAS No. 143.
Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144). This statement supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of and Accounting Principles Board No. 30, Reporting the Results of OperationReporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions. SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and how the results of a discontinued operation are to be measured and presented. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148), an amendment of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123). This statement was issued to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The amendments to SFAS No. 123 in paragraphs 2(a)-2(e) of this statement shall be effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not impact our results of operations or financial condition. The interim disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 are discussed in Note 8.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No. 146). This statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. We do not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 146 will have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
In November, 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached consensus on issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor (EITF 02-16). The consensus requires that certain cash consideration received by a customer from a vendor should be characterized as a reduction of cost of sales when recognized in the customers income statement. However, that presumption is overcome if certain criteria are met. If the presumption is overcome, the consideration would be presented as revenue if it represents a payment for goods or services provided by the reseller to the vendor, or as an offset to an expense if it represents a reimbursement of a cost incurred by the reseller. EITF 02-16 should be applied in annual and interim financial statements for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company is currently assessing, but has not yet determined, the impact of EITF 02-16 on its consolidated financial statements.
7
December 26, 2002 |
September 26, 2002 |
|||||||
Inventories at FIFO cost: |
||||||||
Merchandise |
$ |
76,255 |
|
$ |
79,535 |
| ||
Gasoline |
|
20,721 |
|
|
21,669 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
96,976 |
|
|
101,204 |
| |||
Less adjustment to LIFO cost: |
||||||||
Merchandise |
|
(17,267 |
) |
|
(16,767 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Inventories at LIFO cost |
$ |
79,709 |
|
$ |
84,437 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
installing underground storage tank systems; |
|
upgrading underground storage tank systems; |
|
taking corrective action in response to releases; |
|
closing underground storage tank systems; |
|
keeping appropriate records and |
|
maintaining evidence of financial responsibility for taking corrective action and compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage resulting
from releases. |
|
the per-site deductible; |
|
costs incurred in connection with releases occurring or reported to trust funds prior to their inception; |
|
removal and disposal of underground storage tank systems and |
|
costs incurred in connection with sites otherwise ineligible for reimbursement from the trust funds. |
THE PANTRY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
those third parties do not pay for remediation as we anticipate, we will be obligated to make such payments. This could materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Reimbursements from state trust funds will be dependent upon the continued maintenance and continued solvency of the various funds.
Several of the locations identified as contaminated are being remediated by third parties who have indemnified us as to responsibility for cleanup matters. Additionally, we are awaiting closure notices on several other locations that will release us from responsibility related to known contamination at those sites. These sites continue to be included in our environmental reserve until a final closure notice is received.
NOTE 4LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):
December 26, 2002 |
September 26, 2002 |
|||||||
Senior subordinated notes payable; due October 15, 2007; interest payable semi-annually at 10.25% |
$ |
200,000 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
| ||
Tranche A term loan; interest payable monthly at LIBOR plus 3.5%; principal due in quarterly installments through January 31, 2004 |
|
21,906 |
|
|
26,906 |
| ||
Tranche B term loan; interest payable monthly at LIBOR plus 4.0%; principal due in quarterly installments through January 31, 2006 |
|
175,712 |
|
|
176,185 |
| ||
Tranche C term loan; interest payable monthly at LIBOR plus 4.25%; principal due in quarterly installments through July 31, 2006 |
|
72,938 |
|
|
73,125 |
| ||
Acquisition term loan; interest payable monthly at LIBOR plus 3.5%; principal due in quarterly installments through January 31, 2004 |
|
23,000 |
|
|
27,500 |
| ||
Notes payable to McLane Company, Inc.; zero (0.0%) interest, with principal due in annual installments through February 26, 2003 |
|
297 |
|
|
297 |
| ||
Other notes payable; various interest rates and maturity dates |
|
146 |
|
|
162 |
| ||
Total long-term debt |
|
493,999 |
|
|
504,175 |
| ||
Lesscurrent maturities |
|
(42,913 |
) |
|
(43,255 |
) | ||
Long-term debt, net of current maturities |
$ |
451,086 |
|
$ |
460,920 |
| ||
At December 26, 2002, our senior credit facility consists of a $45.0 million revolving credit facility, which expires January 31, 2004 and bears interest of LIBOR plus 3.5%, and $293.6 million in outstanding term loans. Our revolving credit facility is available for working capital financing, general corporate purposes and issuing commercial and standby letters of credit. As of December 26, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and we had approximately $16.7 million in available borrowing capacity. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility are limited by our outstanding letters of credit of approximately $28.3 million. Furthermore, the revolving credit facility limits our total outstanding letters of credit to $30.0 million. The LIBOR associated with our senior credit facility resets periodically and as of December 26, 2002, was 1.38%.
10
THE PANTRY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The remaining annual maturities of our long-term debt are as follows (amounts in thousands):
Year Ended September: |
|||
2003 |
$ |
33,079 | |
2004 |
|
52,912 | |
2005 |
|
88,654 | |
2006 |
|
119,354 | |
2007 |
|
| |
Thereafter |
|
200,000 | |
Total long-term debt |
$ |
493,999 | |
As of December 26, 2002, we were in compliance with all covenants and restrictions relating to all outstanding borrowings and substantially all of our net assets are restricted as to payment of dividends and other distributions.
NOTE 5DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
We enter into interest rate swap and collar agreements to modify the interest rate characteristics of our outstanding long-term debt and have designated each qualifying instrument as a cash flow hedge. We formally document our hedge relationships, including identifying the hedge instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for entering into the hedge transaction. At hedge inception, and at least quarterly thereafter, the Company assesses whether derivatives used to hedge transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flow of the hedged item. We measure effectiveness by the ability of the interest rate swaps to offset cash flows associated with changes in the variable LIBOR rate associated with our term loan facilities using the hypothetical derivative method. To the extent the instruments are considered to be effective, changes in fair value are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss). To the extent the instruments are considered ineffective, any changes in fair value relating to the ineffective portion are immediately recognized in earnings (interest expense). When it is determined that a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting, and any gains or losses on the derivative instrument are recognized in earnings. Interest income of $219 thousand and $235 thousand was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, respectively, for the mark-to-market adjustment of those instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting.
The fair values of our interest rate swaps and collars are obtained from dealer quotes. These values represent the estimated amount we would receive or pay to terminate the agreement taking into consideration the difference between the contract rate of interest and rates currently quoted for agreements of similar terms and maturities. At December 26, 2002, other accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities include derivative liabilities of $6.2 million and $699 thousand, respectively. At September 26, 2002, other accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities include derivative liabilities of $7.9 million and $699 thousand, respectively.
11
THE PANTRY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The components of accumulated other comprehensive deficit, net of related taxes, are as follows (amounts in thousands):
December 26, 2002 |
September 26, 2002 |
|||||||
Cumulative effect of adoption of SFAS No. 133 (net of related taxes of $59 at December 26, 2002 and $93 at September 26, 2002) |
$ |
(107 |
) |
$ |
(158 |
) | ||
Unrealized losses on qualifying cash flow hedges (net of related taxes of $743 at December 26, 2002 and $1,261 at September 26, 2002) |
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
(1,954 |
) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive deficit |
$ |
(1,235 |
) |
$ |
(2,112 |
) | ||
The pretax, tax and net-of-tax effects on the components of other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (amounts in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 26, 2002 |
December 27, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax |
Tax (Expense) or Benefit |
Net-of-Tax Amount |
Pre-tax |
Tax (Expense) or Benefit |
Net-of-Tax Amount | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of adoption of SFAS No. 133 |
$ |
85 |
$ |
(34 |
) |
$ |
51 |
$ |
85 |
$ |
(33 |
) |
$ |
52 | ||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on qualifying cash flow hedges |
|
1,343 |
|
(517 |
) |
|
826 |
|
721 |
|
(278 |
) |
|
443 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ |
1,428 |
$ |
(551 |
) |
$ |
877 |
$ |
806 |
$ |
(311 |
) |
$ |
495 | ||||||
NOTE 6ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143 and as a result, we recognize the future cost to remove an underground storage tank over the estimated useful life of the storage tank in accordance with SFAS No. 143. A liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation with a corresponding increase to the carrying value of the related long-lived asset is recorded at the time an underground storage tank is installed. We will amortize the amount added to property and equipment and recognize accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the remaining life of the respective underground storage tanks.
The estimated liability is based on historical experience in removing these tanks, estimated tank useful lives, external estimates as to the cost to remove the tanks in the future and federal and state regulatory requirements. The liability is a discounted liability using a credit-adjusted risk-free rate of approximately 9%. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in tank removal costs, tank useful lives or if federal and/or state regulators enact new guidance on the removal of such tanks.
Upon adoption, we recorded a discounted liability of $8.4 million, which is included in other noncurrent liabilities, increased net property and equipment by $2.7 million and recognized a one-time cumulative effect adjustment of $3.5 million (net of deferred tax benefit of $2.2 million). We will amortize the amount added to property and equipment and recognize accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the remaining lives of the respective underground storage tanks. Pro forma effects on earnings from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change for the three months ended December 27, 2001, assuming the adoption of SFAS No. 143 as of September 28, 2001, were not material to net earnings or earnings per share.
12
THE PANTRY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
A reconciliation of the Companys liability for the three months ended December 26, 2002, is as follows (in thousands):
Upon adoption at September 27, 2002 |
$ |
8,443 | |
Accretion expense |
|
134 | |
Total asset retirement obligation |
$ |
8,577 | |
NOTE 7INTEREST EXPENSE
The components of interest expense are as follows (amounts in thousands):
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
December 26, 2002 |
December 27, 2001 |
|||||||
Interest on long-term debt |
$ |
9,379 |
|
$ |
10,255 |
| ||
Interest rate swap settlements |
|
2,475 |
|
|
1,859 |
| ||
Interest on capital lease obligations |
|
547 |
|
|
484 |
| ||
Fair market value change in non-qualifying derivatives |
|
(219 |
) |
|
(235 |
) | ||
Miscellaneous |
|
6 |
|
|
(20 |
) | ||
Total interest expense |
$ |
12,188 |
|
$ |
12,343 |
| ||
NOTE 8STOCK OPTIONS AND OTHER EQUITY INSTRUMENTS
On January 1, 1998, we adopted an incentive and non-qualified stock option plan. Pursuant to the provisions of the plan, options may be granted to officers, key employees, consultants of our Company or any of our subsidiaries and certain members of the board of directors to purchase up to 1,275,000 shares of our Companys common stock. On June 3, 1999, we adopted a new 1999 stock option plan providing for the grant of incentive stock options and non-qualified stock options to officers, directors, employees and consultants, with provisions similar to the 1998 stock option plan and up to 3,825,000 shares of the Companys common stock available for grant. The plans are administered by the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors. Options are granted at prices determined by the board of directors and may be exercisable in one or more installments. Additionally, the terms and conditions of awards under the plans may differ from one grant to another. Under the plans, incentive stock options may only be granted to employees with an exercise price at least equal to the fair market value of the related common stock on the date the option is granted. Fair values are based on the most recent common stock sales.
During the first quarter fiscal 2002, options to acquire 200,000 shares of common stock were granted under the 1999 plan with an exercise price of $5.12 per share. During the first quarter fiscal 2003, we granted options to acquire 355,000 shares of common stock under the 1999 plan with exercise prices ranging from $1.66-$1.70 per share. These options vest over three years and have contractual lives of seven years. Subsequent to December 26, 2002, we granted options to acquire 35,000 shares of common stock under the 1999 plan with an exercise price of $3.97 per share. These options vest over three years and have contractual lives of seven years.
13
THE PANTRY, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 26, 2002:
Exercise Prices |
Date Issued |
Number Outstanding at December 26, 2002 |
Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Number of Options Exercisable |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price | ||||||
$8.82 |
1/1/98 |
289,935 |
5 years |
289,935 |
$ |
8.82 | |||||
$11.27 |
8/25/98 |
94,860 |
5 years |
94,860 |
$ |
11.27 | |||||
$13.00 |
6/8/99, 9/30/99 |
150,000 |
4 years |
150,000 |
$ |
13.00 | |||||
$10.00 |
12/29/00 |
259,500 |
6 years |
86,500 |
$ |
10.00 | |||||
$5.12 |
11/26/01 |
180,000 |
6 years |
60,000 |
$ |
5.12 | |||||
$4.00 |
3/26/02 |
40,000 |
7 years |
0 |
$ |
4.00 | |||||
$1.66 |
10/22/02 |
20,000 |
7 years |
0 |
$ |
1.66 | |||||
$1.70 |
11/13/02 |
335,000 |
7 years |
0 |
$ |
1.70 | |||||
Total |
1,369,295 |
681,295 |
All options granted vest over a three-year period, with one-third of each grant vesting on the anniversary of the initial grant. There were 355,000 options granted, none exercised, 110,910 options forfeited and none that expired during the first quarter fiscal 2003. There were 200,000 options granted, none exercised, none forfeited and none that expired during the first quarter fiscal 2002. All stock options are granted at estimated fair market value of the common stock at the grant date.
The Pantrys stock option plans are accounted for in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Had compensation cost for the plan been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, The Pantrys pro-forma net income (loss) for the first quarter fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 would have been approximately $1.4 million and $414 thousand, respectively. Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per share for the first quarter fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 would have been $0.08 and $0.02, respectively. Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per share for the first quarter fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 would have been $0.08 and $0.02, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
Three Months Ended |
||||||||
December 26, 2002 |
December 27, 2001 |
|||||||
Weighted-average grant date fair value |
$ |
0.67 |
|
$ |
1.77 |
| ||
Weighted-average expected lives (years) |
|
2.00 |
|
|
2.00 |
| ||
Weighted-average grant date fair value-exercise price equals market price |
$ |
0.67 |
|
$ |
1.77 |
| ||
Weighted-average grant date fair value-exercise price greater than market price |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Risk-free interest rate |
|
1.76%-2.21 |
% |
|
2.84 |
% | ||
Expected volatility |
|
70.37 |
% |
|
59.63 |
% | ||
Dividend yield |
|
0.00 |
% |
|
0.00 |
% |
NOTE 9EARNINGS PER SHARE
We compute earnings per share data in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of outstanding warrants and stock options using the treasury stock method.
14
Three Months Ended | ||||||
December 26, 2002 |
December 27, 2001 | |||||
Net income |
$ |
1,438 |
$ |
475 | ||
Earnings per sharebasic: |
||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
18,108 |
|
18,109 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
Net income per sharebasic |
$ |
0.08 |
$ |
0.03 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
Earnings per sharediluted: |
||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
18,108 |
|
18,109 | ||
Dilutive impact of options and warrants outstanding |
|
53 |
|
10 | ||
Weighted average shares and potential dilutive shares outstanding |
|
18,161 |
|
18,119 | ||
|
|
|
| |||
Net income per sharediluted |
$ |
0.08 |
$ |
0.03 | ||
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes. Additional discussion and analysis related to our Company is contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 26, 2002.
Introduction
The Pantry, Inc. is the leading convenience store operator in the southeastern United States and the second largest independently operated convenience store chain in the country with 1,280 stores in 10 southeastern states. Our operating strategy is to provide value to our customers by maintaining high store standards and offering a wide selection of quality products at competitive prices. We sell general merchandise, petroleum products and other products and services targeted to appeal to consumers desire for convenience.
Total revenues for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 were $651.0 million compared to $577.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of 12.7%. The revenue increase is primarily attributable to a 22.4% increase in our average gasoline retail price per gallon and comparable store improvements in merchandise and commission revenue. We believe the comparable store merchandise and commission revenue improvements are primarily attributable to our efforts to reposition our merchandise and gasoline offerings, remain competitively priced on key products, including gasoline, and enhance promotional activity to drive customer traffic. These improvements were realized despite continued volatility in crude oil markets and generally weak economic conditions.
Our first quarter fiscal 2003 EBITDA was $32.9 million and our net income was $1.4 million, or 8 cents per diluted share, compared to EBITDA of $26.5 million, net income of $475 thousand or 3 cents per diluted share in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. First quarter fiscal 2003 adjusted net income was $4.8 million, or 26 cents per diluted share, compared to $334 thousand, or 2 cents per diluted share, for the first quarter fiscal 2002. See discussion and tables below for information regarding these adjustments.
We continue to focus our attention on those aspects of our business we can influence in an effort to position the Company for improved results as the business climate in the Southeast improves. Primarily our management team is focused on the following key initiatives:
| Enhancing our merchandise offering to ensure that our stores are fully stocked with a broad selection of competitively priced products, brands and services our customers are looking for and will return to our locations to purchase; |
| Enhancing our gasoline offering to better rationalize our offering according to consumer preferences in various markets, consolidate the brands that we offer, expand our proprietary Kangaroo brand where appropriate and renegotiate our agreements and partnerships with suppliers; |
| Improving our competitive position through our merchandise and gasoline initiatives and our evaluation of the performance of each store to make the necessary adjustments to ensure that we maintain the appropriate balance between volume and gross profit; |
| Remodeling and upgrading our retail facilities by sensibly applying capital and technology in all areas of our business and |
| Strengthening our financial position by maintaining a disciplined approach to discretionary spending and reducing debt. |
We believe our retail network, merchandise programs, purchasing leverage and in-store execution will allow us to improve comparable store sales and control store operating expenses as the economy improves. In the
16
current environment, we continue to review our merchandise programs and are repositioning certain aspects to drive customer traffic. In an effort to enhance our competitive position, we continued to reposition our pricing and promote key merchandise categories. Over time, we believe these refinements coupled with our efforts to remain competitively priced on key product categories will positively impact comparable store merchandise sales and gross profit.
On the technology front, we rolled out checkout scanning systems across key locations throughout our retail network during the first quarter of fiscal 2003. We believe the benefits of scanning include a range of potential improvements from enhanced store merchandising and more effective in-store promotions to improved inventory controls. We will continue to evaluate and invest in strategic technology-based initiatives designed to improve operating efficiencies, strengthen internal controls and promote our long-term financial objectives.
Given current market conditions and its impact on operating income, we have substantially reduced the pace of our acquisitions and expect to acquire a few additional stores in fiscal 2003, as selective opportunities arise. However, this does not represent a change in our long-term strategic direction. When the environment is once again favorable, we plan to continue to sensibly acquire premium chains located in our existing and contiguous markets.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2003, we closed nine stores. Historically, the stores we close are under performing in terms of volume and profitability and, generally, we benefit from closing the locations by reducing direct overhead expenses and eliminating certain fixed costs.
Throughout fiscal 2003, we plan to focus primarily on the operations side of our business with a renewed effort to enhance in-store merchandising. In fiscal 2003, we anticipate reducing our average outstanding borrowings through scheduled principal payments and we plan to continue to seek ways to improve top-line growth and enhance long-term profitability.
17
Three Months Ended December
26, 2002 [a] |
Three Months Ended December
27, 2001 [a] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
As reported |
Adjustments |
As adjusted |
As reported |
Adjustments |
As adjusted |
|||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ |
651.0 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
651.0 |
|
$ |
577.4 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
577.4 |
| ||||||
Cost of sales |
|
525.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
525.0 |
|
|
461.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
461.9 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Gross profit |
|
126.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
126.0 |
|
|
115.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
115.5 |
| ||||||
Operating, general and administrative expenses |
|
93.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
93.1 |
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
89.0 |
| ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.4 |
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Income from operations |
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.1 |
| ||||||
Interest and miscellaneous expenses [b] |
|
11.8 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
12.6 |
| ||||||
Income before taxes |
|
8.0 |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
7.8 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
0.6 |
| ||||||
Tax expense [c] |
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
0.1 |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
0.1 |
|
|
(0.2 |
) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net income before cumulative effect adj |
|
4.9 |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
4.8 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
0.3 |
| ||||||
Cumulative effect adjustment [d] |
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net income |
$ |
1.4 |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
$ |
0.3 |
| ||||||
Earnings per diluted share |
$ |
0.08 |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
$ |
0.02 |
| ||||||
Selected Financial Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ |
32.9 |
|
$ |
26.5 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Merchandise margin |
|
32.9 |
% |
|
32.6 |
% |
||||||||||||||||||
Gasoline gallons |
|
283.8 |
|
|
287.9 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Gasoline margin per gallon |
$ |
0.1392 |
|
$ |
0.1123 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Gasoline retail per gallon |
$ |
1.42 |
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Comparable store data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merchandise sales % |
|
3.3 |
% |
|
1.4 |
% |
||||||||||||||||||
Gasoline gallons % |
|
0.7 |
% |
|
0.8 |
% |
||||||||||||||||||
Number of stores: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period |
|
1,280 |
|
|
1,318 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average store count |
|
1,285 |
|
|
1,320 |
|
[a] |
These financial tables may not foot due to rounding. |
[b] |
Fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2003 have been adjusted to eliminate the non-cash fair market value adjustments associated with non-qualifying derivative instruments.
|
[c] |
The adjustment to income tax expense reflects the tax impact of the adjustment outlined above. |
[d] |
Fiscal 2003 has been adjusted to exclude the cumulative effect of change in accounting principles related to the adoption of SFAS No. 143.
|
Merchandise Revenue. Merchandise revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $242.3 million compared to $237.2 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $5.1 million or 2.2%. The increase is primarily attributable to a 3.3% increase in comparable store merchandise revenue compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2002 partially offset by lost revenue from closed stores. The increase in comparable store merchandise revenue is primarily attributable to our efforts to enhance and reposition our merchandise offerings, increased promotional activity and more aggressive pricing in key categories in an effort to drive customer traffic.
Gasoline Revenue and Gallons. Gasoline revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $401.9 million compared to $334.3 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $67.6 million or 20.2%. The increase in gasoline revenue is primarily attributable to the 26 cents per gallon, or 22.4% increase in the average gasoline retail price per gallon partially offset by a 0.7% decline in comparable store gasoline gallon volume.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2003, gasoline gallons sold were 283.8 million compared to 287.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, a decrease of 4.1 million gallons or 1.4%. The decrease is primarily attributable to the comparable store gasoline gallon sales decline coupled with lost gallon volume from closed stores.
Commission Revenue. Commission revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $6.7 million compared to $5.8 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $882 thousand or 15.1%. The increase is primarily due to the January 2002 introduction of South Carolinas Educational Lottery program.
Total Gross Profit. Total gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $126.0 million compared to $115.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $10.5 million or 9.1%. The increase in gross profit is primarily attributable to increases in gasoline gross profit per gallon, merchandise margin and commission revenue.
Merchandise Gross Profit and Margin. Merchandise gross profit was $79.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $77.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $2.5 million or 3.2%. This increase is primarily attributable to the increased merchandise revenue discussed above and a 30 basis points increase in our merchandise margin. Merchandise margin increased to 32.9% for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 from the 32.6% reported for the first quarter of fiscal 2002.
Gasoline Gross Profit and Per Gallon Margin. Gasoline gross profit was $39.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $32.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $7.2 million or 22.2%. The increase is primarily attributable to a 2.7 cents per gallon increase in gasoline margin, partially offset by the comparable store gallon decline. Gasoline gross profit per gallon was 13.9 cents in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to 11.2 cents for the first quarter of fiscal 2002.
Operating, General and Administrative Expenses. Operating, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 totaled $93.1 million compared to $89.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $4.2 million or 4.7%. This increase is primarily due to higher insurance costs and costs associated with store closings.
Income from Operations. Income from operations totaled $19.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $13.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $6.6 million or 50.7%. The increase is primarily attributable to the increases in gasoline and merchandise gross margins as discussed above, an increase in commission revenue and positive comparable store merchandise revenue.
EBITDA. EBITDA represents income from operations before depreciation and amortization and non-recurring charges. EBITDA for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 totaled $32.9 million compared to EBITDA of $26.5 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2002, an increase of $6.3 million or 23.9%. The increase is attributable to the increases in merchandise and gasoline gross profit as discussed above.
19
EBITDA is not a measure of performance under generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered as a substitute for net income, cash flows from operating activities and other income or cash flow statement data, or as a measure of profitability or liquidity. We have included information concerning EBITDA as one measure of our cash flow and historical ability to service debt and we believe investors find this information useful. EBITDA as defined may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Interest Expense. Interest expense is primarily interest on the borrowings under our senior credit facility and senior subordinated notes. Interest expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $12.2 million compared to $12.3 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The impact of a general decline in interest rates, a decrease in our weighted average borrowings and the change in fair market value of our non-qualifying interest rate derivatives was offset by an increase in our interest rate swap settlement payments of $616 thousand.
Income Tax Expense. We recorded income tax expense of $3.1 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $318 thousand for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The increase in income tax expense was primarily attributable to the increase in pre-tax income partially offset by a decline in our effective tax rate to 38.5% compared to 40.1% in the first quarter of fiscal 2002.
Cumulative Effect Adjustment. We recorded a one-time cumulative effect charge of $3.5 million relating to the disposal of our underground storage tanks in accordance with the adoption of SFAS No. 143.
Net Income. Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2003 was $1.4 million compared to net income of $475 thousand for the first quarter of fiscal 2002. The increase is attributable to the items discussed above. Adjusted net income, which excludes the fair market value change in non-qualifying derivatives and the cumulative effect adjustment, was $4.8 million compared to adjusted net income of $333 thousand for the first quarter of fiscal 2002.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows from Operations. Due to the nature of our business, substantially all sales are for cash, and cash provided by operations is our primary source of liquidity. We rely primarily upon cash provided by operating activities, supplemented as necessary from time to time by borrowings under our senior credit facility, sale-leaseback transactions, asset dispositions and equity investments, to finance our operations, pay interest and debt amortization and fund capital expenditures. Cash used by operating activities declined from $14.7 million for the first quarter fiscal 2002 to $10.1 million for the first quarter fiscal 2003. We had $21.6 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand at December 26, 2002.
Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures (excluding all acquisitions) were approximately $2.9 million for the first quarter fiscal 2003. Capital expenditures are primarily expenditures for existing store improvements, store equipment, new store development, information systems and expenditures to comply with regulatory statutes, including those related to environmental matters.
We finance substantially all capital expenditures and new store development through cash flow from operations, a sale-leaseback program or similar lease activity, vendor reimbursements and asset dispositions. Our sale-leaseback program includes the packaging of our owned convenience store real estate, both land and buildings, for sale to investors in return for their agreement to lease the property back to us under long-term leases. Generally, the leases are operating leases at market rates with terms of twenty years with four five-year renewal options. The lease payments are based on market rates applied to the cost of each respective property. We retain ownership of all personal property and gasoline marketing equipment. Our senior credit facility limits or caps the proceeds of sale-leasebacks that we can use to fund our operations or capital expenditures. Under our sale-leaseback program, we received $1.2 million for the three months ended December 26, 2002. Vendor reimbursements primarily relate to oil-company payments to either enter into long-term supply agreements or to upgrade gasoline marketing equipment including canopies, gasoline dispensers and signs.
20
For the first quarter fiscal 2003, we received approximately $1.6 million in proceeds from asset dispositions and vendor reimbursements bringing total proceeds including sale-leaseback transactions to $2.8. Therefore, our net capital expenditures, excluding all acquisitions, for the first quarter fiscal 2003 were $125 thousand. We anticipate that net capital expenditures for fiscal 2003 will be in the range of $22.0 to $25.0 million.
Long-Term Debt. Our long-term debt consisted of $200.0 million of senior subordinated notes, $293.6 million outstanding under our senior credit facility and $443 thousand in other notes payable with various interest rates and maturity dates.
We have outstanding $200.0 million of 10 1/4% senior subordinated notes due 2007. Interest on the senior subordinated notes is due on October 15 and April 15 of each year.
As of December 26, 2002, our senior credit facility consisted of a $45.0 million revolving credit facility and $293.6 million in outstanding borrowings under term loans. Our revolving credit facility is available for working capital financing, general corporate purposes and issuing commercial and standby letters of credit. As of December 26, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility. We had outstanding letter of credit of $28.3 million issued under the revolving credit facility. As of December 26, 2002, we had $16.7 million available for borrowing or additional letters of credit under the credit facility. The revolving credit facility limits our total outstanding letters of credit to $30.0 million. In fiscal 2003, we anticipate amending our senior credit facility to include, among other things, amending our limit on outstanding letters of credit. Until our revolving credit facility terms are amended, we may have to finance certain purchase obligations and insurance liabilities with cash deposits or other financing alternatives.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. For the three months ended December 26, 2002, we used cash on hand to make principal repayments of $10.2 million.
Cash Requirements. We believe that cash on hand, together with cash flow anticipated to be generated from operations, short-term borrowings for seasonal working capital needs and permitted borrowings under our credit facilities including such amendments described above will be sufficient to enable us to satisfy anticipated cash requirements for operating, investing and financing activities, including debt service, for the next twelve months. The revolving credit facility matures January 31, 2004. The Company believes it will be able to refinance or obtain an extension of this credit facility under acceptable terms.
Shareholders Equity. As of December 26, 2002, our shareholders equity totaled $117.7 million. The $2.5 million increase from September 26, 2002 is attributable to the net income for the period coupled with a decrease in our accumulated other comprehensive deficit related to our derivative instruments.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Contractual Obligations. The following table shows our expected long-term debt amortization schedule, future capital lease commitments (including principal and interest) and future operating lease commitments as of December 26, 2002:
Contractual Obligations
(Dollars in thousands)
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
Thereafter |
Total | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ |
33,079 |
$ |
52,912 |
$ |
88,654 |
$ |
119,354 |
$ |
|
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
493,999 | |||||||
Capital lease obligations |
|
2,586 |
|
3,275 |
|
2,949 |
|
2,728 |
|
2,648 |
|
20,975 |
$ |
35,161 | |||||||
Operating leases |
|
37,999 |
|
49,186 |
|
47,028 |
|
44,583 |
|
43,259 |
|
337,910 |
$ |
559,965 | |||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ |
73,664 |
$ |
105,373 |
$ |
138,631 |
$ |
166,665 |
$ |
45,907 |
$ |
558,885 |
$ |
1,089,125 | |||||||
21
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
Thereafter |
Total | |||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
$ |
18,778 |
$ |
9,503 |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
28,281 |
discontinued operation are to be measured and presented. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 did not have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Effective September 27, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148), an amendment of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123). This statement was issued to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. In addition, this statement amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The amendments to SFAS No. 123 in paragraphs 2(a)-2(e) of this statement shall be effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 148 did not impact our results of operations or financial condition. The interim disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 are discussed in Note 8.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No. 146). This statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. We do not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 146 will have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
In November, 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached consensus on issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor (EITF 02-16). The consensus requires that certain cash consideration received by a customer from a vendor should be characterized as a reduction of cost of sales when recognized in the customers income statement. However, that presumption is overcome if certain criteria are met. If the presumption is overcome, the consideration would be presented as revenue if it represents a payment for goods or services provided by the reseller to the vendor, or as an offset to an expense if it represents a reimbursement of a cost incurred by the reseller. EITF 02-16 should be applied in annual and interim financial statements for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company is currently assessing, but has not yet determined, the impact of EITF 02-16 on its consolidated financial statements.
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described below before making a decision to invest in our common stock, our senior subordinated notes and our senior credit facility. Any of these risk factors, or others not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, could negatively impact our results of operations or financial condition in the future. In that case, the trading price of our common stock, our senior subordinated notes and our senior credit facility could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Our Operating Results and Financial Condition are Subject to Fluctuations Caused by Many Factors. Our annual and quarterly results of operations are affected by a number of factors which can adversely effect our revenue, profitability or cash flow, including without limitation:
| Competitive pressures from convenience store operators, gasoline stations and other non-traditional operators located in our markets; |
| Changes in economic conditions generally and in the markets we serve; |
| Unfavorable weather conditions; |
| Political conditions in crude oil producing regions, including South America and the Middle East; |
| Volatility in crude oil and wholesale petroleum costs; |
| Wholesale cost increases of tobacco products; |
23
| Consumer behavior, travel and tourism trends; |
| Changes in state and federal environmental and other regulations; |
| Financial leverage and debt covenants; |
| Changes in the credit ratings assigned to our debt securities, credit facilities and trade credit; |
| The interests of our controlling stockholder; |
| Acts of war and terrorism and |
| Other unforeseen factors. |
The Convenience Store Industry Is Highly Competitive and Impacted by New Entrants. The industry and geographic areas in which we operate are highly competitive and marked by ease of entry and constant change in terms of the number and type of retailers offering the products and services found in our stores. We compete with other convenience store chains, gasoline stations, supermarkets, drugstores, discount stores, club stores and mass merchants. In recent years, several non-traditional retail segments entering the gasoline retail business including supermarkets, club stores and mass merchants have impacted the convenience store industry. These non-traditional gasoline retailers have obtained a share of the motor fuels market and their market share is expected to grow. In some of our markets, our competitors have been in existence longer and have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond better to changes in the economy and new opportunities within the industry. To remain competitive, we must constantly analyze consumer preferences, competitive offerings and competitive prices to ensure we offer a selection of products and services consumers demand at competitive prices. We must also maintain and upgrade our customer service levels, facilities and locations to remain competitive and drive customer traffic to our stores. Major competitive factors include, among others, location, ease of access, gasoline brands, pricing, product and service selections, customer service, store appearance, cleanliness and safety.
Changes in Economic Conditions may Influence Consumer Preferences and Spending Patterns. Changes in economic conditions generally or in the Southeast could adversely impact consumer spending patterns and travel and tourism in our market areas. Approximately 47% of our stores are located in coastal, resort or tourist destinations. Historically, travel and consumer behavior in such markets is more severely impacted by weak economic conditions.
Unfavorable Weather Conditions Could Adversely Affect Our Business. Substantially all of our stores are located in the Southeast region of the United States. Though the Southeast is generally known for its mild weather, the region is susceptible to severe storms including hurricanes, thunderstorms, extended periods of rain, ice storms and heavy snow. Approximately 51% of our stores are located in coastal areas and Florida. Inclement weather conditions as well as severe storms in the Southeast could damage our facilities or could have a significant impact on consumer behavior, travel and convenience store traffic patterns as well as our ability to operate our locations. In addition, we typically generate higher revenues and gross margins during warmer weather months in the Southeast, which fall within our third and fourth quarters. If weather conditions are not favorable during these periods, our operating results and cash flow from operations could be adversely affected.
Political Conditions in Oil Producing Regions Could Impact the Price of Wholesale Petroleum Costs and Our Operating Results. General political conditions and instability in oil producing regions particularly in the Middle East and Venezuela could significantly impact crude oil supplies and wholesale petroleum costs. In addition, the supply of gasoline for our unbranded locations and our wholesale purchase costs could be adversely impacted in the event of a shortage as our gasoline contracts do not guarantee an uninterrupted, unlimited supply of gasoline. Significant increases and volatility in wholesale petroleum costs could result in significant increases in the retail price of petroleum products and in lower gasoline gross margin per gallon. Increases in the retail price of petroleum products could impact consumer demand for gasoline. These factors could materially impact our gasoline gallon volume, gasoline gross profit and overall customer traffic.
Volatility in Crude Oil and Wholesale Petroleum Costs Could Impact Our Operating Results. In the past three fiscal years, our gasoline revenue accounted for approximately 61.0% of total revenues and our gasoline gross profit accounted for approximately 28.2% of total gross profit. Crude oil and domestic wholesale petroleum
24
markets are marked by significant volatility. This volatility makes it is extremely difficult to predict the impact future wholesale cost fluctuations will have on our operating results and financial condition. These factors could materially impact our gasoline gallon volume, gasoline gross profit and overall customer traffic.
Wholesale Cost Increases of Tobacco Products Could Impact our Merchandise Gross Profit. Sales of tobacco products have averaged approximately 13.9% of our total revenue over the past three fiscal years. Significant increases in wholesale cigarettes costs and tax increase on tobacco products, as well as national and local campaigns to discourage smoking in the United States, may have an adverse effect on unit demand for cigarettes domestically. In general, we attempt to pass price increases on to our customers, however due to competitive pressures in our markets, we may not be able to do so. These factors could materially impact our retail price of cigarettes; cigarette unit volume and revenues; merchandise gross profit and overall customer traffic.
Changes in Consumer Behavior, Travel and Tourism Could Impact Our Business. In the convenience store industry, customer traffic is generally driven by consumer preferences and spending trends, growth rates for automobile and truck traffic and trends in travel, tourism and weather. To meet consumer demands and remain competitive, we must stock our locations with the right mix of products consumers prefer and constantly compare our assortment of products to market research data. If we are unable to obtain and offer an appropriate mix of products, our operating results may be impacted and we may lose customers to other convenience store chains or other channels.
We are Subject to State and Federal Environmental and Other Regulations. Our business is subject to extensive governmental laws and regulations including, but not limited to, environmental regulations, employment laws and regulations, regulations governing the sale of alcohol and tobacco, minimum wage requirements and other laws and regulations.
Under various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, we may, as the owner or operator of our locations, be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of contamination at these or our former locations, whether or not we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence of such contamination. The failure to properly remediate such contamination may subject us to liability to third parties and may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow money using such property as collateral. Additionally, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances may also be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of such substances at sites where they are located, whether or not such site is owned or operated by such person. Although we do not typically arrange for the treatment or disposal of hazardous substances, we may be deemed to have arranged for the disposal or treatment of hazardous or toxic substances and, therefore, may be liable for removal or remediation costs, as well as other related costs, including governmental fines, and injuries to persons, property and natural resources.
Compliance with existing and future environmental laws regulating underground storage tanks may require significant capital expenditures and the remediation costs and other costs required to clean up or treat contaminated sites could be substantial. We pay tank fees and other taxes to state trust funds in support of future remediation obligations. These state trust funds or other responsible third parties including insurers are expected to pay or reimburse us for remediation expenses less a deductible. To the extent third parties do not pay for remediation as we anticipate, we will be obligated to make these payments, which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Reimbursements from state trust funds will be dependent on the continued viability of these funds.
In the future, we may incur substantial expenditures for remediation of contamination that has not been discovered at existing locations or locations, which we may acquire. We cannot assure you that we have identified all environmental liabilities at all of our current and former locations; that material environmental conditions not known to us do not exist; that future laws, ordinances or regulations will not impose material environmental liability on us; or that a material environmental condition does not otherwise exist as to any one or more of our locations. In addition, failure to comply with any environmental regulations or an increase in regulations could affect operating results and financial condition.
25
State laws regulate the sale of alcohol and tobacco products. A violation or change of these laws could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations because state and local regulatory agencies have the power to approve, revoke, suspend or deny applications for, and renewals of, permits and licenses relating to the sale of these products or to seek other remedies.
Any appreciable increase in the statutory minimum wage rate would result in an increase in our labor costs and such cost increase, or the penalties for failing to comply with such statutory minimums, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, regulations are proposed which, if adopted, could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We Depend on One Principal Supplier for The Majority of Our Merchandise. We purchase over 50% of our general merchandise, including most tobacco products and grocery items, from a single wholesale grocer, McLane Company, Inc. We have a contract with McLane until 2007, but we may not be able to renew the contract upon expiration. A change of suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, cost of goods, financial condition and results of operations.
Our Financial Leverage and Debt Covenants Impact Our Fiscal and Financial Flexibility. We are highly leveraged, which means that the amount of our outstanding debt is large compared to the net book value of our assets, and we have substantial repayment obligations under our outstanding debt. We will have to use a portion of our cash flow from operations for debt service, rather than for our operations or to implement our growth strategy. As of December 26, 2002, we had consolidated debt including capital lease obligations of approximately $510.6 million and shareholders equity of approximately $117.7 million. As of December 26, 2002, our availability under our senior credit facility for borrowing or issuing additional letters of credit was approximately $16.7 million.
We are vulnerable to increases in interest rates because the debt under our senior credit facility is at a variable interest rate and although in the past we have on occasion entered into certain hedging instruments in an effort to manage our interest rate risk, we cannot assure you that we will continue to do so, on favorable terms or at all, in the future.
Our senior credit facility contains numerous financial and operating covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities such as acquiring or disposing of assets, engaging in mergers or reorganizations, making investments or capital expenditures and paying dividends. These covenants require that we meet interest coverage, net worth and leverage tests. The indenture governing our senior subordinated notes and our senior credit facility permit us and our subsidiaries to incur or guarantee additional debt, subject to limitations.
Any breach of these covenants could cause a default under our debt obligations and result in our debt becoming immediately due and payable which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For the twelve-month period ending September 27, 2001, we failed to satisfy two financial covenants required by our senior credit facility. During the first quarter of fiscal 2002, we received a waiver from our senior credit group and executed an amendment to the senior credit facility that included, among other things, a modification to financial covenants and certain increases in the floating interest rate. Our ability to respond to changing business conditions and to secure additional financing may be restricted by these covenants, which may become more restrictive in the future. We also may be prevented from engaging in transactions, including acquisitions that may be important to our long-term growth strategy.
Changes in Our Credit Ratings or Trade Credit Terms Could Adversely Impact our Financial Condition and Operating Flexibility. If the Companys credit ratings are downgraded, our financial flexibility, borrowing costs, product supply costs and ability to obtain future financing on acceptable terms may be affected. Furthermore, we rely on credit terms provided by our major suppliers including our major wholesaler, gasoline suppliers and other suppliers. Material changes in these credit terms could impact our operating results and financial condition.
26
Acts of War and Terrorism Could Impact Our Business. Acts of war and terrorism could impact general economic conditions and the supply and price of crude oil. In addition, these events may cause damage to our retail facilities and disrupt the supply of the products and services we off in our locations. The factors could impact our revenues, operating results and financial condition.
Any of the above factors may cause actual results to vary materially from anticipated results, historical results or recent trends in operating results and financial condition.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Quantitative Disclosures. We are exposed to market risks inherent in our financial instruments. These instruments arise from transactions entered into in the normal course of business and, in some cases, relate to our acquisitions of related businesses. We are subject to interest rate risk on our existing long-term debt and any future financing requirements. Our fixed rate debt consists primarily of outstanding balances on our senior subordinated notes and our variable rate debt relates to borrowings under our senior credit facility.
The following table presents the future principal cash flows and weighted average interest rates based on rates in effect at December 26, 2002, on our existing long-term debt instruments. Fair values have been determined based on quoted market prices as of January 27, 2003.
Expected Maturity Date
as of December 26, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
Fiscal 2003 |
Fiscal 2004 |
Fiscal 2005 |
Fiscal 2006 |
Fiscal 2007 |
Thereafter |
Total |
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ |
33,079 |
|
$ |
52,912 |
|
$ |
88,654 |
|
$ |
119,354 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
$ |
493,999 |
|
$ |
479,998 | ||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
|
8.53 |
% |
|
7.79 |
% |
|
8.11 |
% |
|
9.18 |
% |
|
10.25 |
% |
|
10.25 |
% |
|
8.56 |
% |
In order to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations, we have entered into interest rate swap arrangements in which we agree to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. The interest rate differential is reflected as an adjustment to interest expense over the life of the swaps. Fixed rate swaps are used to reduce our risk of increased interest costs during periods of rising interest rates. At December 26, 2002, the interest rate on 77.0% of our debt was fixed by either the nature of the obligation or through the interest rate swap arrangements compared to 72.5% at December 27, 2001.
The following table presents the notional principal amount, weighted average pay rate, weighted average receive rate and weighted average years to maturity on our interest rate swap contracts:
Interest Rate Swap Contracts
(Dollars in thousands)
December 26, 2002 |
December 27, 2001 |
|||||||
Notional principal amount |
$ |
180,000 |
|
$ |
180,000 |
| ||
Weighted average pay rate |
|
6.12 |
% |
|
6.12 |
% | ||
Weighted average receive rate |
|
1.42 |
% |
|
2.00 |
% | ||
Weighted average years to maturity |
|
0.62 |
|
|
1.62 |
|
28
|
interest rate risk on long-term and short-term borrowings; |
|
our ability to pay or refinance long-term borrowings at maturity at market rates; |
|
the impact of interest rate movements on our ability to meet interest expense requirements and exceed financial covenants and |
|
the impact of interest rate movements on our ability to obtain adequate financing to fund future acquisitions. |
THE PANTRY, INC.
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits
10.1 |
Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement between The Pantry and Peter J. Sodini |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On December 23, 2002, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K attaching the certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
30
THE PANTRY, INC. | ||
By: |
/s/ DANIEL J. KELLY | |
Daniel J. Kelly Vice
President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary (Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) | ||
Date: February 3, 2003 |
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Pantry, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
a. |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b. |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c. |
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
5. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b. |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
|
6. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Pantry, Inc.; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
a. |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b. |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c. |
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
5. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a. |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b. |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
|
6. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. |
Description of Document | |
10.1 |
Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement between Peter J. Sodini and The Pantry |
34