UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
(Mark One)
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2003
OR
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ________ to _______
Commission File Number 1-14705
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
88-0228636 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
15880 North Greenway-Hayden Loop, Suite 100, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (480) 627-2700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2)
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the issuers class of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding as of November 3, 2003 | |||
Common Stock |
209,716,300 |
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
INDEX
Part I Financial Information |
|||||
Item 1 Financial Statements |
|||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
3 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
4 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
5 | ||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
6 | ||||
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
39 | ||||
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
51 | ||||
Item 4 Controls and Procedures |
51 | ||||
Part II Other Information |
|||||
Item 1 Legal Proceedings |
52 | ||||
Item 2 Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
52 | ||||
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
52 | ||||
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
52 | ||||
Item 5 Other Information |
52 | ||||
Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
52 | ||||
Signatures |
54 |
2
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||
Current Assets |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 210,214 | $ | 179,425 | |||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $23,070 and $22,535 |
709,006 | 667,077 | |||||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
101,395 | 121,164 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
78,217 | 104,421 | |||||||
Total current assets |
1,098,832 | 1,072,087 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net |
3,993,945 | 4,029,745 | |||||||
Goodwill, net |
8,452,819 | 8,530,463 | |||||||
Other assets, net |
245,085 | 296,627 | |||||||
Total assets |
$ | 13,790,681 | $ | 13,928,922 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 268,363 | $ | 163,526 | |||||
Accounts payable |
428,688 | 421,782 | |||||||
Current portion of accrued capping, closure, post-closure and
environmental costs |
95,975 | 95,249 | |||||||
Accrued interest |
217,593 | 182,039 | |||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
350,802 | 364,219 | |||||||
Unearned revenue |
228,061 | 222,978 | |||||||
Total current liabilities |
1,589,482 | 1,449,793 | |||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion |
7,936,492 | 8,718,642 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes |
81,991 | 51,408 | |||||||
Accrued capping, closure, post-closure and environmental
costs, less current portion |
774,014 | 864,668 | |||||||
Other long-term obligations |
887,290 | 908,409 | |||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
|||||||||
Series A senior convertible preferred stock, 1,000 shares
authorized, issued and outstanding, liquidation
preference of $1,309 and $1,247 per share |
1,308,512 | 1,246,904 | |||||||
Stockholders Equity |
|||||||||
Series C senior mandatory convertible preferred stock,
$.10 par value, 6,900 shares authorized, issued and
outstanding, liquidation preference of $50.00 per share |
333,064 | | |||||||
Common stock; $0.01 par value; 525,000 authorized shares,
209,065 and 196,215 shares issued and outstanding |
2,091 | 1,962 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
1,024,614 | 989,647 | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(107,005 | ) | (131,206 | ) | |||||
Retained deficit |
(39,864 | ) | (171,305 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,212,900 | 689,098 | |||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 13,790,681 | $ | 13,928,922 | |||||
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these balance sheets.
3
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 4,032,289 | $ | 3,999,971 | $ | 1,393,541 | $ | 1,379,959 | ||||||||||
Cost of operations |
2,452,605 | 2,351,510 | 846,772 | 804,162 | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
359,125 | 351,133 | 120,403 | 117,264 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
409,731 | 364,413 | 140,784 | 124,449 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income |
810,828 | 932,915 | 285,582 | 334,084 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense and other |
621,861 | 652,901 | 194,471 | 228,682 | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
188,967 | 280,014 | 91,111 | 105,402 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
81,652 | 115,947 | 40,009 | 43,907 | ||||||||||||||
Minority interest |
1,435 | 1,747 | 545 | 632 | ||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
105,880 | 162,320 | 50,557 | 60,863 | ||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(3,665 | ) | (877 | ) | (12,115 | ) | (3,745 | ) | ||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle,
net of tax |
29,226 | | | | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
131,441 | 161,443 | 38,442 | 57,118 | ||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(71,858 | ) | (57,771 | ) | (26,487 | ) | (19,779 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ | 59,583 | $ | 103,672 | $ | 11,955 | $ | 37,339 | ||||||||||
Basic EPS: |
||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.22 | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
(0.02 | ) | | (0.06 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
0.15 | | | | ||||||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||||
Weighted average common shares |
198,253 | 190,193 | 202,991 | 190,349 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS: |
||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
(0.02 | ) | | (0.06 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
0.15 | | | | ||||||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.19 | ||||||||||
Weighted average common and common equivalent
shares |
201,565 | 193,473 | 206,888 | 192,717 | ||||||||||||||
Pro forma amounts, assuming the change in
accounting principle is applied retroactively: |
||||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ | 95,689 | $ | 34,428 | ||||||||||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.49 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||||||||||
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
4
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Operating activities |
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 131,441 | $ | 161,443 | |||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
3,665 | 877 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operating activities from continuing operations |
|||||||||
Provisions for: |
|||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
409,731 | 364,413 | |||||||
Doubtful accounts |
16,522 | 12,215 | |||||||
Accretion of debt and amortization of debt issuance costs |
24,874 | 32,860 | |||||||
Deferred income tax |
64,450 | 104,996 | |||||||
Gain on sale of fixed assets |
(143 | ) | (5,462 | ) | |||||
Non-cash reduction in acquisition related accruals |
(8,490 | ) | | ||||||
Non-cash (gain) loss on de-designated interest rate swap
contracts |
(36,475 | ) | 7,886 | ||||||
Amortization of accumulated other comprehensive income for
de-designated interest rate swap contracts |
17,729 | 26,550 | |||||||
Write-off of deferred debt issuance costs |
55,877 | 7,831 | |||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle,
net of tax |
(29,226 | ) | | ||||||
Change in operating assets and liabilities, excluding the effects
of purchase acquisitions |
|||||||||
Accounts receivable, prepaid and other assets |
(65,920 | ) | 4,532 | ||||||
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities, unearned revenue,
stock option tax benefits and other |
56,336 | 45,512 | |||||||
Capping, closure and post-closure provision and accretion |
33,277 | 53,222 | |||||||
Capping, closure, post-closure and environmental
expenditures |
(44,085 | ) | (55,723 | ) | |||||
Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations |
629,563 | 761,152 | |||||||
Investing activities |
|||||||||
Proceeds from divestitures (cost of acquisitions), net of cash
divested/acquired |
62,489 | (27,084 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
14,546 | 22,762 | |||||||
Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions |
(350,525 | ) | (430,321 | ) | |||||
Capitalized interest |
(11,667 | ) | (16,947 | ) | |||||
Change in deferred acquisition costs, notes receivable and
other |
(5,418 | ) | (12,434 | ) | |||||
Cash used for investing activities from continuing operations |
(290,575 | ) | (464,024 | ) | |||||
Financing activities |
|||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of Series C Preferred Stock |
333,080 | | |||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of issuance costs |
2,687,688 | 674,582 | |||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(3,414,334 | ) | (969,036 | ) | |||||
Payments of Series C Preferred Stock cash dividend |
(4,849 | ) | | ||||||
Change in disbursement account |
(3,391 | ) | (76,983 | ) | |||||
Net proceeds from sale of common stock and exercise of
stock options and other |
97,419 | 2,594 | |||||||
Cash used for financing activities from continuing operations |
(304,387 | ) | (368,843 | ) | |||||
Cash (used for) provided by discontinued operations |
(3,812 | ) | 13,812 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
30,789 | (57,903 | ) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
179,425 | 157,757 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 210,214 | $ | 99,854 | |||||
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
5
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Allied Waste Industries, Inc., (Allied, we or the Company), a Delaware corporation, is the second largest, non-hazardous solid waste management company in the United States, as measured by revenues. We provide non-hazardous waste collection, transfer, recycling and disposal services in 38 states geographically identified as the Central, Eastern, Southern and Western areas of the United States.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Allied and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The December 31, 2002 balance sheet data included herein is derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2002 and the unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. As applicable under such regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. We believe that the presentations and disclosures herein are adequate when read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2003, and for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the financial position and results of operations for such periods. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current presentation.
Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for full years. These Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 and the related notes thereto included in our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 29, 2003.
For the description of our significant accounting policies, see Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
During the first quarter of 2003, we adopted certain changes in accounting principles that impact the comparability of the financial information presented herein. See Recently adopted accounting pronouncements below.
Discontinued operations
During the third quarter of 2003, we determined that certain operations in Florida that were held for sale as of September 30, 2003 were discontinued operations. These operations are being sold as part of our divestiture plan that was launched in connection with our financing plan in early 2003. The sale of these operations closed in October 2003 and we received net proceeds of approximately $40 million, which were used to repay debt. These discontinued operations were reported in our Southern geographic operating segment.
The Florida assets identified in the third quarter as held for sale, including goodwill, were adjusted to the lower of carrying value or fair value. We estimate fair value based on the anticipated sales price. Included in the results for discontinued operations is a loss of approximately $18.2 million ($10.1 million, net of tax) for both the nine and three months ended September 30, 2003, reflecting the adjustment to fair value for these operations.
6
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Also included in the results for discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2003, is a loss of approximately $3.9 million ($2.4 million net of tax) related to the New Jersey operations held for sale at June 30, 2003, which were sold in August 2003. The additional loss is primarily a result of purchase price adjustments when the assets were divested.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the results for discontinued operations include a loss of approximately $45.5 million ($7.8 million loss after a $37.7 million tax benefit) reflecting the adjustment to fair value for discontinued operations. The discontinued operations for the nine months include the New Jersey and Florida operations discussed above along with hauling operations in South Carolina, Georgia and Colorado which were sold in second quarter 2003. The discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were reported in our Western, Eastern and Southern geographic operating segments. Certain of the operations divested, or held for sale, were or are being sold pursuant to a stock sale agreement. We had additional tax basis in the stock of these operations, which previously could not be recognized under SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The divestitures and expected utilization of the resulting capital loss for tax purposes allowed us to record a tax benefit.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes reflect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of these operations as discontinued operations. Following is a summary of the assets held for sale on the consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
$ | 7,759 | $ | 20,539 | |||||
Other current assets |
533 | 3,225 | |||||||
Property and equipment, net |
24,871 | 51,627 | |||||||
Other long-term assets |
12,103 | 11,223 | |||||||
Total assets |
$ | 45,266 | $ | 86,614 | |||||
Current liabilities |
2,290 | 20,454 | |||||||
Long-term liabilities |
1,617 | 6 | |||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 3,907 | $ | 20,460 | |||||
Amounts related to assets held for sale on the balance sheet are included in other current assets, other long-term assets, other accrued liabilities and other long-term obligations. Excluded from the balances at September 30, 2003 are amounts related to the operations that were sold prior to September 30, 2003.
Results of operations for the discontinued operations were as follows (in thousands):
For the Nine Months Ended | For the Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 119,965 | $ | 146,810 | $ | 28,527 | $ | 49,227 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before tax |
$ | 6,899 | $ | (1,457 | ) | $ | 517 | $ | (6,227 | ) | ||||||
Loss on divestiture |
45,460 | | 22,061 | | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit |
34,896 | 580 | 9,429 | 2,482 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
$ | (3,665 | ) | $ | (877 | ) | $ | (12,115 | ) | $ | (3,745 | ) | ||||
7
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In accordance with EITF Issue No. 87-24, Allocation of Interest to Discontinued Operations, we allocate interest to discontinued operations based on a ratio of net assets to be sold or sold to the sum of consolidated net assets plus consolidated debt. We do not allocate interest on debt that is directly attributable to other operations outside of the discontinued operations. For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2003, we allocated $3.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of interest expense to discontinued operations. For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2002, we allocated $4.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively, of interest expense to discontinued operations.
Statements of cash flows
The supplemental cash flow disclosures and non-cash transactions for the nine months ended September 30 are as follows (in thousands):
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Supplemental Disclosures - |
|||||||||
Interest paid (net of amounts capitalized) |
$ | 512,208 | $ | 553,505 | |||||
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
21,713 | 7,811 | |||||||
Non-Cash Transactions - |
|||||||||
Debt incurred or assumed in acquisition |
$ | | $ | 85 | |||||
Liabilities incurred or assumed in acquisitions |
9,743 | 4,215 | |||||||
Capital lease obligations, incurred |
| 5,156 | |||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
61,618 | 57,771 |
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information presently available. Actual results may differ significantly from the estimates.
Interest expense capitalized
During the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, we incurred gross interest expense (including payments under interest rate swap contracts) of $561.7 million and $599.4 million, of which $11.7 million and $16.9 million, respectively, was capitalized.
Stock-based compensation plans
We account for our stock-based compensation plans under Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25 (APB 25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and the related interpretations, for which no compensation cost is recorded in the statement of operations for the estimated fair value of stock options issued with an exercise price equal to the fair value of the common stock on the date of grant. SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation (SFAS 123), as amended by SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS 148), requires that companies, which do not elect to account for stock-based compensation as prescribed by this statement, disclose the pro forma effects on earnings and earnings per share as if SFAS 123 had been adopted.
8
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
If we applied the recognition provisions of SFAS 123 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the resulting pro forma net income available to common shareholders, and pro forma net income available to common shareholders per share would be as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
For the Nine Months | For the Three Months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Net income available to common
shareholders,
as reported |
$ | 59,583 | $ | 103,672 | $ | 11,955 | $ | 37,339 | |||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based
employee
compensation
expense determined under
fair value based method,
net of tax |
7,468 | 4,476 | 2,489 | 1,650 | |||||||||||||
Net income available to
common
shareholders, pro forma |
$ | 52,115 | $ | 99,196 | $ | 9,466 | $ | 35,689 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.20 | |||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.19 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share:
|
|||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.19 | |||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.19 |
We have recorded no compensation expense for stock options granted to employees during the nine and three months ended September 30, 2003 or 2002.
In accordance with the SFAS 123, the fair value of each option grant has been estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Risk free interest rate |
2.3 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||
Expected life |
4.8 years | 4.2 years | ||||||
Dividend rate |
0 | % | 0 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
63 | % | 68 | % |
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations (SFAS 143) in June 2001, which outlines standards for accounting for obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived tangible assets. The standard was effective January 1, 2003 and impacts the accounting for landfill retirement obligations, which we have historically referred to as closure and post-closure. The adoption of the standard had no impact on our cash requirements. See Note 7 for additional discussion.
9
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145, Rescission of FASB Statements 4, 44 and 64, amendment of FASB Statement 13, and Technical Corrections (SFAS 145), which among other things, restricts the classification of gains and losses from extinguishment of debt as extraordinary, therefore, certain debt extinguishment gains and losses will no longer be classified as extraordinary. We adopted SFAS 145 effective January 1, 2003. Under SFAS 145, gains and losses on future debt extinguishments, if any, will generally be recorded in interest expense. Extraordinary losses of $10.1 million and $17.0 million as previously reported, net of tax for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, were reclassified on a pre-tax basis to interest expense to conform to the requirements under SFAS 145. In first quarter 2003, the adoption of SFAS 145 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. During the first nine months of 2003 and 2002, we recorded approximately $70.7 million and $10.9 million, respectively, pretax to interest expense and other for the write-off of deferred debt issuance cost and premiums paid in connection with the completion of our financing plan and the open market repurchases of bonds. These amounts would have been recorded as extraordinary loss prior to the adoption of SFAS 145.
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS 146), which prescribes the financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities such as: contract terminations, consolidation of facilities and termination benefits to involuntarily terminated employees. SFAS 146 excludes from its scope exit and disposal activities that are in connection with a business combination and those activities to which SFAS 143 and 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144) are applicable. Under SFAS 146, certain costs associated with exit and disposal activities are to be recognized as liabilities at the time they meet the definition of a liability (as defined in FASB Concepts Statement 6) as opposed to at the time to which a plan is committed. SFAS 146 is effective for exit and disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. We adopted SFAS 146 on January 1, 2003. At the time of adoption, SFAS 146 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45). FIN 45 expands on the accounting guidance of Statements 5, 57, and 107 and incorporates without change the provisions of FASB Interpretation 34, which is being superceded. FIN 45 elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees, including loan guarantees such as standby letters of credit. It also clarifies that at the time a company issues a guarantee, the company must recognize an initial liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes under that guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and annual financial statements. We adopted the disclosure requirements of FIN 45 as of December 31, 2002. Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the recognition requirements of FIN 45 for any guarantees entered in or modified subsequent to January 1, 2003. At the time of adoption, FIN 45 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46), which requires unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries. In October 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 46-6, Effective Date of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIE) which delays the effective date of FIN 46 to December 15, 2003 for certain VIEs. FIN 46 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity (SFAS 150). SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for classifying and measuring certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. In November 2003, the FASB issued a FSP delaying the effective date for certain instruments and entities. SFAS 150 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
10
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. Property and Equipment
The following tables show the activity and balances related to property and equipment from December 31, 2002 through September 30, 2003 (in millions):
Property and Equipment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | Acquisitions, | Transfers | Balance at | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Capital | Sales and | Net of | and | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2002 | Additions | Retirements | Divestitures | Other(1) | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||
Land and
improvements |
$ | 431.0 | $ | 7.1 | $ | (3.4 | ) | $ | (0.9 | ) | $ | (6.3 | ) | $ | 427.5 | |||||||||
Land held for
permitting as
landfills |
114.6 | 8.7 | | | (23.8 | ) | 99.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Landfills |
2,533.5 | 147.6 | | 22.9 | 490.1 | 3,194.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Buildings and
improvements |
444.5 | 17.4 | (4.4 | ) | (2.3 | ) | (0.5 | ) | 454.7 | |||||||||||||||
Vehicles and
equipment |
1,695.0 | 128.5 | (71.7 | ) | (2.6 | ) | (4.1 | ) | 1,745.1 | |||||||||||||||
Containers and
compactors |
762.8 | 39.0 | (9.0 | ) | (6.0 | ) | 1.5 | 788.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Furniture and office
equipment |
43.5 | 2.2 | (2.0 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 43.4 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,024.9 | $ | 350.5 | $ | (90.5 | ) | $ | 10.9 | $ | 456.8 | $ | 6,752.6 | |||||||||||
Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at | and | Acquisitions, | Transfers | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Amortization | Sales and | Net of | and | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2002 | Expense | Retirements | Divestitures | Other(1) | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||
Land and
improvements |
$ | (17.4 | ) | $ | (3.5 | ) | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (20.9 | ) | ||||||||
Landfills |
(659.5 | ) | (175.9 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | (437.7 | ) | (1,275.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Buildings and
improvements |
(88.4 | ) | (16.3 | ) | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | (102.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Vehicles and
equipment |
(816.9 | ) | (144.3 | ) | 64.5 | 4.2 | | (892.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Containers and
compactors |
(386.0 | ) | (65.0 | ) | 8.2 | 4.7 | (0.2 | ) | (438.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Furniture and office
equipment |
(27.0 | ) | (4.2 | ) | 1.9 | 0.2 | | (29.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (1,995.2 | ) | $ | (409.2 | ) | $ | 76.1 | $ | 7.6 | $ | (438.0 | ) | $ | (2,758.7 | ) | ||||||||
Property and
equipment, net |
$ | 4,029.7 | $ | (58.7 | ) | $ | (14.4 | ) | $ | 18.5 | $ | 18.8 | $ | 3,993.9 | ||||||||||
(1) Relates primarily to (i) the impact of adoption of SFAS 143 recorded as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle which was an increase to the gross landfill asset and accumulated amortization for landfills of $410.2 million and $435.3 million, respectively and (ii) purchase accounting adjustments during the allocation period.
11
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
3. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In accordance with SFAS 142 we do not amortize goodwill. Instead we perform an annual assessment of goodwill impairment by applying a fair value based test to each of our reporting units, which we define as our four geographic operating segments. We completed our annual assessment of goodwill as of December 31, 2002 and no impairment was recorded. We may conduct an impairment test of goodwill more frequently than annually under certain conditions. For example, a significant adverse change in liquidity or the business environment, unanticipated competition, a significant adverse action by a regulator or a disposal of a significant portion of an operating segment could prompt an impairment test between annual assessments.
We evaluate goodwill for impairment based on fair value of each geographic operating segment. The calculation of fair value is subject to judgments and estimates. We estimate fair value based on net cash flows discounted using a weighted-average cost of capital of approximately 8%. In addition, consideration is also given to an earnings multiple approach, enterprise value, and overall company market capitalization to evaluate the reasonableness of our discounted cash flows. The estimated fair value could change if there were future changes in our capital structure, cost of debt, interest rates, capital expenditure levels, ability to perform at levels that were forecasted or a permanent change to the market capitalization of our company.
Our geographic operating segment level is an aggregate of several vertically integrated businesses with similar operational characteristics. A divestiture of any individual asset below the geographic operating segment level could result in a loss. At the time of a divestiture of an individual business within a geographic operating segment, goodwill is allocated to that business and a gain or loss on disposal is derived. Subsequently, the remaining goodwill in the geographic operating segment that the assets were divested from would be re-evaluated for realizability, which could result in an additional loss being recognized.
During 2003, we have sold or held for sale certain operations in the Western, Southern and Eastern geographic operating segments (see Note 1). As of September 30, 2003, we allocated approximately $103 million of goodwill related to these operations, of which $29 million relates to the assets held for sale at September 30, 2003. The remaining goodwill in these geographic operating segments was subsequently evaluated for realizability and we concluded there was no impairment.
We have incurred non-cash losses on sales of assets when we believed that re-deployment of the proceeds from the sale of such assets could reduce debt or improve operations and was economically beneficial. If such decisions are made in the future, we could incur additional non-cash losses on asset sales.
12
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table shows the activity and balances related to goodwill for the nine months from December 31, 2002 through September 30, 2003 (in millions):
Balance as of | Balance as of | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2002 | Acquisitions | Divestitures | Adjustments (1) | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Western Area |
$ | 1,420.8 | $ | 1.5 | $ | (6.9 | ) | $ | | $ | 1,415.4 | |||||||||
Central Area |
1,904.8 | 8.7 | (1.6 | ) | (0.3 | ) | 1,911.6 | |||||||||||||
Eastern Area |
2,453.7 | 0.2 | (30.1 | ) | 2.5 | 2,426.3 | ||||||||||||||
Southern Area |
2,751.2 | 13.1 | (37.7 | ) | (27.1 | ) | 2,699.5 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,530.5 | $ | 23.5 | $ | (76.3 | ) | $ | (24.9 | ) | $ | 8,452.8 | ||||||||
(1) | Amounts primarily relate to write-off of goodwill in connection with assets held for sale accounting and purchase accounting adjustments during the allocation period. |
In addition, we have other amortizable intangible assets that consist primarily of the following at September 30, 2003 (in thousands):
Gross | Net | ||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | |||||||||||
Value | Amortization | Value | |||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
$ | 15,725 | $ | (10,187 | ) | $ | 5,538 | ||||||
Other |
1,620 | (165 | ) | 1,455 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 17,345 | $ | (10,352 | ) | $ | 6,993 | ||||||
Amortization expense for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2003 was $2.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Based upon the amortizable assets recorded in the balance sheet at September 30, 2003, amortization expense for each of the next five years is estimated to be declining from $2.0 million to $0.3 million.
13
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
4. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 consists of the amounts listed in the following table. The effective interest rate includes our interest cost incurred, the effect of interest rate swap contracts, amortization of deferred debt issuance cost and the amortization or accretion of discounts or premiums. (in thousands, except percentages)
Debt Balance at | Effective Interest Rate | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | | $ | | 5.39 | %* | 5.97 | %* | ||||||||
Tranche A term loan facility |
| 899,061 | | 9.09 | % | |||||||||||
Tranche B term loan facility |
| 670,941 | | 8.38 | % | |||||||||||
Tranche C term loan facility |
| 805,129 | | 9.46 | % | |||||||||||
2003 Term loan B |
1,185,000 | | 7.91 | % | | |||||||||||
2003 Term loan C |
250,000 | | 4.09 | % | | |||||||||||
Receivables secured loan |
138,888 | | 2.14 | % | | |||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 7.88% |
874,049 | 873,944 | 8.14 | % | 8.14 | % | ||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 7.63% |
600,000 | 600,000 | 7.99 | % | 7.99 | % | ||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 7.38% |
224,981 | 224,923 | 7.90 | % | 7.90 | % | ||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 8.88% |
600,000 | 600,000 | 9.15 | % | 9.16 | % | ||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 8.50% |
750,000 | 750,000 | 8.78 | % | 8.77 | % | ||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 9.25% |
377,210 | 377,396 | 9.34 | % | 9.45 | % | ||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 7.88% |
450,000 | | 8.04 | % | | |||||||||||
Debentures, interest at 7.40% |
287,024 | 285,312 | 10.11 | % | 10.17 | % | ||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 6.10% |
| 156,526 | | 8.35 | % | |||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 6.38% |
147,596 | 145,223 | 9.18 | % | 9.31 | % | ||||||||||
Debentures, interest at 9.25% |
95,561 | 95,393 | 9.87 | % | 9.90 | % | ||||||||||
Senior notes, interest at 7.88% |
68,592 | 68,125 | 8.92 | % | 8.97 | % | ||||||||||
Solid waste revenue bond obligations,
principal
payable through 2031 |
306,104 | 307,268 | 4.89 | % | 6.18 | % | ||||||||||
Senior subordinated notes, interest at 10.00% |
1,836,800 | 2,005,578 | 10.22 | % | 10.18 | % | ||||||||||
Notes payable to banks, finance companies, individuals
and others, and obligations under capital leases |
13,050 | 17,349 | 9.05 | % | 8.64 | % | ||||||||||
8,204,855 | 8,882,168 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Current portion |
268,363 | 163,526 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 7,936,492 | $ | 8,718,642 | |||||||||||||
* reflects weighted average interest rate
14
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Completion of financing plan
On March 27, 2003, we announced a multifaceted financing plan that would enable us to refinance the 1999 Credit Facility. In April 2003, we completed that financing plan. The financing plan included issuance of a receivables secured loan, common stock, mandatory convertible preferred stock and senior notes, along with the refinancing of the 1999 Credit Facility, discussed below. The issuance of the common stock, mandatory convertible preferred stock and senior notes were consummated under our shelf registration statement.
Issuance of common stock
On April 9, 2003, we issued 12,048,193 shares of common
stock, par value $0.01, through a public offering for
net proceeds of approximately $94 million.
Issuance of mandatory convertible
preferred stock
On April 9, 2003, we issued 6.9 million shares of
Series C Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock (Series
C Preferred Stock), par value $0.10 at $50 per share,
through a public offering for net proceeds of
approximately $333 million. The Series C Preferred
Stock has a dividend rate of 6.25%. The Series C
Preferred Stock is mandatorily convertible on April 1,
2006. On the conversion date, each share of Series C
Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares
of common stock based on the following conversion
table:
Applicable Market Value | ||
of Common Shares | Conversion Rate | |
Less than or equal to $8.30 | 6.02:1 | |
Between $8.30 and $10.13 | 6.02:1 to 4.94:1 | |
Equal to or greater than $10.13 | 4.94:1 |
The Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into common stock at any time prior to April 1, 2006 at the option of the holder at a conversion rate of 4.94. Any time prior to April 1, 2006, the Series C Preferred Stock can be required to be converted at our option if the closing price of our common stock is greater than $15.20 for 20 days within a 30-day consecutive period. If the conversion is required by us, we are required to pay the present value of the remaining dividend payments through April 1, 2006.
Issuance of senior notes
On April 9, 2003, Allied Waste North America, Inc.
(Allied NA, a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of
Allied) issued $450 million of 7.875% Senior Notes due
2013 (2003 Senior Notes) for net proceeds of
approximately $440 million. The 2003 Senior Notes have
a no call provision until 2008. Interest is payable in
April and October of each year beginning October 2003.
The aggregate net proceeds of approximately $867 million from the issuance of the common stock, Series C Preferred Stock and 2003 Senior Notes were used to reduce borrowings under the tranche A, B and C term loans under our 1999 Credit Facility on a pro-rata basis.
15
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Refinancing of 1999 Credit
Facility
On April 29, 2003, we refinanced our
1999 Credit Facility, which consisted
of a $1.291 billion revolving credit
facility, due 2005 and $2.226 billion
in funded, amortizing senior secured
term loans with varying maturity dates
through 2007, with a $2.9 billion
senior secured credit facility (the
2003 Credit Facility) that includes a
$1.5 billion revolver due January 2008
(the 2003 Revolver), a $1.2 billion
term loan with final maturity in
January 2010 (the 2003 Term Loan), and
a $200 million institutional letter of
credit facility. In addition, the 2003
Credit Facility allows us to establish
an incremental term loan in an amount
up to $250 million and an additional
institutional letter of credit facility
in an amount up to $500 million. Of
the $1.5 billion available under the
2003 Revolver, the entire amount may be
used to support the issuance of letters
of credit.
During August 2003, we completed an amendment to our 2003 Credit Facility permitting the proposed Series A Preferred Stock exchange transaction (see Note 8) and, in addition, providing increased financial flexibility to us over the term of the 2003 Credit Facility. The amendment provided for an additional $250 million of term loan indebtedness and permits the issuance of an additional $750 million of other senior indebtedness in the future. Additionally, the amendment permits us to use the net proceeds of the $250 million additional term loan indebtedness and any successful issuance of other indebtedness of up to $750 million to retire our outstanding senior subordinated indebtedness through optional redemption, public tender offer or open market repurchases.
During the third quarter, we funded a new $250 million Term Loan C (due 2010) under the 2003 Credit Facility and used approximately $168 million of the proceeds to repurchase a portion of our senior subordinated notes in the same amount of principal. In connection with these repurchases, we paid premiums of approximately $14.7 million which are recorded in interest expense and other. During October 2003, we repurchased $82 million of our senior subordinated notes using the remaining Term Loan C proceeds and paid premiums of approximately $7.6 million related to these repurchases.
At September 30, 2003, we had approximately $637.2 million in letters of credit outstanding under the 2003 Revolver and $200 million in letters of credit outstanding under the institutional letter of credit facility. In addition, at September 30, 2003, we had approximately $862.8 million available under the 2003 Revolver. In connection with the completion of the financing plan, we recorded a charge to interest expense and other of approximately $52.1 million related to the write-off of deferred and current debt issuance costs.
The 2003 Credit Facility bears interest at (a) an Alternative Base Rate, or (b) Adjusted LIBOR, both terms defined in the 2003 Credit Facility, plus, in either case, an applicable margin based on our leverage ratio. Proceeds from the 2003 Credit Facility may be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including acquisitions.
We are required to make prepayments on the 2003 Credit Facility upon completion of certain transactions as defined in the 2003 Credit Facility, including asset sales and issuances of debt securities. Proceeds from these transactions are to be applied pursuant to the 2003 Credit Facility. We are also required to make prepayments on the 2003 Credit Facility for 50% of any excess cash flows from operations, as defined.
16
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Under the 2003 Credit Facility, we are subject to the following financial covenants:
Minimum Interest Coverage:
From the | Through the Quarter | EBITDA(1)/ | ||
Quarter Ending | Ending | Interest | ||
March 31, 2003 | September 30, 2003 | 1.90x | ||
December 31, 2003 | September 30, 2004 | 2.00x | ||
December 31, 2004 | June 30, 2005 | 2.15x | ||
September 30, 2005 | June 30, 2006 | 2.25x | ||
September 30, 2006 | March 31, 2007 | 2.50x | ||
June 30, 2007 | September 30, 2007 | 2.75x | ||
December 31, 2007 | Thereafter | 3.00x |
Maximum Leverage:
From the | Through the Quarter | Total Debt/ | ||
Quarter Ending | Ending | EBITDA (1) | ||
March 31, 2003 | September 30, 2003 | 5.75x | ||
December 31, 2003 | September 30, 2004 | 5.50x | ||
December 31, 2004 | September 30, 2005 | 4.75x | ||
December 31, 2005 | September 30, 2006 | 4.50x | ||
December 31, 2006 | September 30, 2007 | 4.00x | ||
December 31, 2007 | Thereafter | 3.50x |
At September 30, 2003, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under our 2003 Credit Facility. At September 30, 2003, Total Debt/EBITDA(1) ratio, as defined by the 2003 Credit Facility, was 4.86:1 and our EBITDA(1)/Interest ratio was 2.14:1. We are not subject to any minimum net worth covenants.
(1) EBITDA used for covenants is calculated in accordance with the definition in our credit facility agreement (Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003). In this context, EBITDA is used solely to provide information on the extent to which we are in compliance with debt covenants.
In addition, the 2003 Credit Facility restricts us from making certain types of payments, including dividend payments on our common and preferred stock. However, we are able to pay cash dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock and, after July 30, 2004, pay up to $75 million of cumulative cash dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock even if the leverage ratio is in excess of 4:1. See Note 8 for a discussion of the anticipated conversion of our Series A Preferred Stock.
Our 2003 Credit Facility, 2003 Senior Notes, 2002 Senior Notes, 2001 Senior Notes, 1998 Senior Notes and $690 million of senior notes assumed from BFI are secured by substantially all of BFI and certain other Allied subsidiaries and a security interest in the assets of BFI, its domestic subsidiaries and certain other Allied subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2003, the book value of the assets of the subsidiaries that serve as collateral was approximately $7.8 billion, which represents approximately 57% of our consolidated total assets.
17
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Receivables secured loan
We have an accounts receivable securitization program with a financial institution that allows us to borrow up to $175 million on a revolving basis under a loan agreement secured by receivables. The borrowings are secured by accounts receivable that are owned by a wholly-owned and fully consolidated subsidiary. Under SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities - a Replacement of FASB Statement 125 (SFAS 140), the securitization program is accounted for as secured borrowing with a pledge of collateral. The receivables and debt obligation remain on our consolidated balance sheet. At September 30, 2003, we had outstanding borrowings under this program of $139 million. The borrowings under this program bear interest at the financial institutions commercial paper rate plus an applicable spread and interest is payable monthly. There is also a fee on the undrawn portion of the $175 million available for borrowing. The loan agreement has a one year term with a three year liquidity facility, however, we intend to extend the agreement annually. If we are unable to renew annually, we have the intent and ability to refinance these borrowings through the 2003 Revolver of the 2003 Credit Facility. Accordingly, the loan has been classified as long-term.
5. | Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities |
Our risk management policy requires 75% of our total debt to be fixed, either directly or effectively through interest rate swap contracts. At September 30, 2003, all of our debt was fixed, 80% directly and 20% through interest rate swap contracts, protecting us from cash flow variations arising from changes in short term interest rates. Given our capital structure, we believe it is prudent to minimize interest expense volatility. At September 30, 2003, the notional value of our interest rate swap contracts was $1.85 billion with a weighted average of 9.5 months to maturity. These contracts expire as follows: $200 million during 2003, $1.4 billion during 2004, and $250 million during 2005. As a result of the refinancing of our 1999 Credit Facility and related reduction in our debt balance, at September 30, 2003, we had interest rate swap contracts that exceed our variable rate debt. At this time, we do not believe it is economically beneficial to terminate the interest rate swap contract prior to maturity and we expect to be less than 100% hedged by mid-2004 through the stated maturities of the contracts.
At September 30, 2003, a liability of $66.8 million was included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in other long-term obligations reflecting the fair market value of our entire interest rate swap portfolio on that date. The liability will fluctuate with market interest rates but will reduce to zero over the terms of each of our interest rate swap contracts. Approximately $34.0 million of the liability at September 30, 2003 relates to contracts maturing within 12 months. Fair value variations over the life of the interest rate swap contracts arise from changes in forecasted interest rates and the time value of money.
Designated interest rate swap contracts
Our designated interest rate swap contracts are effective as cash flow hedges of our variable rate debt under our 2003 Credit Facility. The notional amounts, indices, repricing dates, and all other significant terms of the swap agreements are matched to the provisions and terms of the variable rate debt being hedged achieving 100% effectiveness. If significant terms do not match we will assess any ineffectiveness and any ineffectiveness is immediately recorded in interest expense in our statement of operations.
Changes in fair value of our designated interest rate swap contracts are reflected in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI). At September 30, 2003, approximately $40.8 million ($24.8 million, net of tax) is included in AOCI.
Expense or income related to swap settlements are recorded in interest expense for the related variable rate debt over the term of the agreements.
18
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
De-designated interest rate swap contracts
Settlement payments and periodic changes in market values of our de-designated interest rate swap contracts are recorded as a gain or loss on derivative contracts included in interest expense in our statement of operations. We recorded $15.4 million and $(9.1) million of net gain/(loss) related to changes in market values and $13.0 million and $15.1 million of settlement costs during the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, we recorded $36.5 million and $(7.9) million of net gain/(loss) related to changes in market values and $39.0 million and $44.1 million of settlement costs.
When interest rate swap hedging relationships are de-designated or terminated, any accumulated gains or losses in AOCI at the time of de-designation are isolated and amortized over the remaining original hedged interest payment. For contracts de-designated, the total amount of loss in AOCI at September 30, 2003 was approximately $12.1 million ($7.5 million, net of tax). For the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2003, we recorded $17.7 million and $5.4 million, respectively, of amortization expense related to the accumulated losses in AOCI for interest rate swap contracts that were de-designated. We expect to record approximately $12.1 million of amortization expense related to the accumulated losses in AOCI for the de-designated swap contracts in the next twelve months. The amortization expense is recorded in interest expense.
6. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of the ending balances of accumulated other comprehensive loss, as reflected in stockholders equity are shown as follows (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes of $49,840 |
$ | (74,760 | ) | $ | (74,760 | ) | |||
Interest rate swap contracts designated,
unrealized loss, net of taxes of $16,022 and $25,065 |
(24,759 | ) | (38,322 | ) | |||||
Interest rate swap contracts de-designated,
unrealized loss, net of taxes of $4,595 and $11,686 |
(7,486 | ) | (18,124 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | (107,005 | ) | $ | (131,206 | ) | |||
The components of total comprehensive income are shown as follows (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 131,441 | $ | 161,443 | $ | 38,442 | $ | 57,118 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
|||||||||||||||||
Designated interest rate swap
contracts unrealized gain (loss), net of tax effect of $9,043, $1,979, $4,064 and ($4,951) |
13,563 | 3,190 | 5,917 | (7,426 | ) | ||||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings for
interest rate swap contracts, net of tax effect of $7,091, $10,532, $2,173 and $3,540 |
10,638 | 16,018 | 3,260 | 5,310 | |||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 155,642 | $ | 180,651 | $ | 47,619 | $ | 55,002 | |||||||||
19
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
7. | Landfill Accounting |
Change in accounting principle
Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS 143 which outlines standards for accounting for our landfill retirement obligations that have historically been referred to as closure and post-closure. SFAS 143 does not change the basic accounting principles that the waste industry has historically followed for accounting for these types of obligations. In general, the industry has followed the accounting practice of recognizing a liability on the balance sheet and related expense as waste is disposed at the landfill to match operating costs with revenues. The industry refers to this practice as life-cycle accounting. The principle elements of life-cycle accounting are still being followed.
The new rules are a refinement to our industry practices and have caused a change in the mechanics of calculating landfill retirement obligations and the classification of where amounts are recorded in the financial statements. Landfill retirement obligations are no longer accrued through a provision to cost of operations, but rather by an increase to landfill assets. Liabilities retained from divested landfills that were historically accounted for in closure and post-closure liabilities were reclassified to other long-term obligations because they were not within the scope of SFAS 143. In addition, in accordance with SFAS 143, we changed the classification of costs related to capping, closure and post-closure obligations to other accounts. The most significant change in classification is that we now record the costs for methane gas collection systems in the landfill development assets.
Upon adoption, SFAS 143 required a cumulative change in accounting for landfill obligations retroactive to the date the landfill operations commenced or the date the asset was acquired. To do this, SFAS 143 required the creation of the related landfill asset, net of accumulated amortization and an adjustment to the capping, closure and post-closure liabilities for cumulative accretion.
At January 1, 2003, we recorded a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of a net gain of approximately $29.2 million (net of income tax expense of $19.5 million). In addition, we recorded a decrease in our capping, closure and post-closure liabilities of approximately $100.7 million, an increase in other long-term obligations of approximately $26.9 million, and a decrease in our net landfill assets of approximately $25.1 million.
Following is a summary of the balance sheet changes for landfill assets and capping, closure and post-closure liabilities at January 1, 2003 (in millions):
Balance at | Balance at | |||||||||||
December | January 1, | |||||||||||
31, 2002 | Change | 2003 | ||||||||||
Landfill assets |
$ | 2,533.5 | $ | 410.2 | $ | 2,943.7 | ||||||
Accumulated amortization |
(659.5 | ) | (435.3 | ) | (1,094.8 | ) | ||||||
Net landfill assets |
$ | 1,874.0 | $ | (25.1 | ) | $ | 1,848.9 | |||||
Capping, closure, and
post-closure liabilities |
$ | 594.8 | $ | (100.7 | ) | $ | 494.1 | |||||
The pro forma liability for capping, closure and post-closure obligations as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 would have been $494.1 million, $440.4 million and $392.9 million, respectively.
Landfill accounting
We have a network of 169 owned or operated active landfills with a net book value of approximately $1.9 billion at September 30, 2003. The landfills have operating lives ranging from 1 to over 150 years based on available capacity using current annual volumes. The average life of our landfills approximates 39 years.
We use a life-cycle accounting method for landfills and the related closure and post-closure liabilities. This method applies the costs associated with acquiring, developing, closing and monitoring the landfills over the associated landfill capacity and associated consumption.
20
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Specifically, we record landfill retirement obligations at fair value as a liability with a corresponding increase to the landfill asset as tons are disposed. The amortizable landfill asset includes (i) landfill development costs incurred, (ii) landfill development costs expected to be incurred over the life of the landfill, (iii) the recorded capping, closure and post-closure liabilities and (iv) the cost estimates for future capping, closure and post-closure costs. We amortize the landfill asset over the total capacity of the landfill as volume is consumed during the life of the landfill with one exception. The exception applies to capping costs for which both the recognition of the liability and the amortization of these costs is based instead on the costs and capacity of the specific capping event.
On an annual basis, we update the development cost estimates (which include the costs to develop the site as well as the individual cell construction costs) and capping, closure and post-closure cost estimates for each landfill. Additionally, future capacity estimates (sometimes referred to as airspace) are updated annually using aerial surveys of each landfill to estimate utilized disposal capacity and remaining disposal capacity. The overall cost and capacity estimates are reviewed and approved by senior operations management annually.
Landfill assets
We use the units of production method for purposes of calculating the amortization rate at each landfill. This methodology divides the remaining costs (including any unamortized amounts recorded) associated with acquiring, permitting and developing the entire landfill plus the total remaining costs for specific capping events, closure and post-closure by the total remaining disposal capacity of that landfill (except for capping costs, which are divided by the total remaining capacity of the specific capping event). The resulting per unit amortization rates are applied to each unit disposed at the landfill and are recorded as expense for that period. We expensed approximately $175.9 million and $63.1 million, or an average of $3.04 and $3.06 per ton consumed, related to landfill amortization during the nine and three months ended September 30, 2003. Landfill amortization expense for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2002 would have been $158.0 million and $55.1 million or an average of $2.93 and $2.89 per ton consumed if we had been accounting for landfill retirement obligations under SFAS 143 since January 1, 2002. The following is a rollforward of our investment in our landfill assets excluding land held for permitting as landfills (in thousands):
Net Book | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value of | Capping, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Book Value | Landfills | Landfill | Closure and | Net Book Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
at December 31, | Acquired, net | Development | Post Closure | Landfill | at September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
2002 | of Divestitures | Costs | costs | Amortization | Other(1) | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
$1,874,020 |
20,782 | 159,317 | 21,853 | (175,873 | ) | 18,737 | $ | 1,918,836 |
(1) Includes the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle upon the adoption of SFAS 143 of $25.1 million and amounts transferred from land or land held for permitting as landfills to landfill, for projects that have met the criteria for probable expansion during 2003.
Costs associated with developing the landfill include direct costs such as excavation, liners, leachate collection systems, methane gas collection system installation, engineering and legal fees, and capitalized interest. Estimated total future development costs for our 169 active landfills at December 31, 2002 was approximately $3.7 billion, excluding capitalized interest, and we expect that this amount will be spent over the remaining operating lives of the landfills. We have available disposal capacity of approximately 2.5 billion tons, as of December 31, 2002. We classify this total disposal capacity as either permitted (having received the final permit from the governing authorities) or probable expansion. Probable expansion disposal capacity has not yet received final approval from the regulatory agencies, but we have determined that certain critical criteria have been met and the successful completion of the expansion is highly probable. Our requirements to classify disposal capacity as probable expansion are as follows:
21
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | We have control of and access to the land where the expansion permit is being sought. | ||
2. | All geologic and other technical siting criteria for a landfill have been met, or a variance from such requirements has been received (or can reasonably be expected to be achieved). | ||
3. | The political process has been assessed and there are no identified impediments that cannot be resolved. | ||
4. | We are actively pursuing the expansion permit and have an expectation that the final local, state and federal permits will be received within the next five years. | ||
5. | Senior operations management approval has been obtained. |
Upon successfully meeting the preceding criteria, the costs associated with developing, constructing, closing and monitoring the total additional future disposal capacity are considered in the life-cycle cost of the landfill and reflected in the calculation of the amortization rate and the rate at which capping, closure and post-closure is accrued. At September 30, 2003, we had 1.9 billion tons of permitted disposal capacity, and at 37 of our landfills, 619.7 million tons of probable expansion disposal capacity.
We, together with our engineering and legal consultants, continually monitor the progress of obtaining local, state and federal approval for each of our expansion permits. If it is determined that the expansion no longer meets our criteria, the disposal capacity is removed from our total available disposal capacity; the costs to develop that disposal capacity; and, the associated capping, closure and post-closure costs are removed from the landfill amortization base, and rates are adjusted prospectively. In addition, any value assigned to probable expansion capacity is written-off to expense during the period in which it is determined that the criteria are no longer met.
Capping, closure and post-closure
In addition to our portfolio of 169 active landfills, we own or have responsibility for 110 closed landfills no longer accepting waste. As individual areas within each landfill reach capacity, we are required to cap and close the areas in accordance with the landfill site permit. Generally, capping activities include the installation of compacted clay, geosynthetic liners, drainage channels, compacted soil layers and vegetative soil barriers over areas of a landfill where total airspace has been consumed and waste is no longer being received. Capping activities occur throughout the life of the landfill.
Closure costs are those costs incurred after a landfill site stops receiving waste, but prior to being certified as closed. After the entire landfill site has reached capacity and is closed, we are required to maintain and monitor the site for a post-closure period, which may extend for 30 years. Post-closure requirements generally include maintenance and operational costs of the site and monitoring the methane gas collection systems and groundwater systems, among other post-closure activities. Estimated costs for closure and post-closure as required under Subtitle D regulations are compiled and updated annually for each landfill by local and regional company engineers. Daily maintenance activities, such as leachate disposal, methane gas and groundwater monitoring and maintenance, and mowing and fertilizing capped areas, incurred during the operating life of the landfill are expensed as incurred.
SFAS 143 requires landfill obligations to be recorded at fair value. Quoted market prices in active markets are the best evidence of fair value. Since quoted market prices for landfill retirement obligations are not available to determine fair value, we use discounted cash flows of capping, closure and post-closure cost estimates to approximate fair value. The cost estimates are prepared by our local management and third-party engineers based on the applicable local, state and federal regulations and site specific permit requirements and are intended to approximate fair value.
22
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Capping, closure and post-closure costs are estimated for the period of performance utilizing estimates a third party would charge (including profit margins) to perform those activities in full compliance with Subtitle D. If we perform the capping, closure and post-closure activities internally, the difference between amounts accrued, based upon third party cost estimates (including profit margins) and our actual cost incurred is recognized as a component of cost of operations in the period earned. An estimate of fair value should include the price that marketplace participants are able to receive for bearing the uncertainties in cash flows. However, when utilizing discounted cash flows, reliable estimates of market risk premiums may not be obtainable. In our industry, there is no market that exists for selling the responsibility for capping, closure and post-closure independent of selling the entire landfill. Accordingly, we believe that it is not possible to develop a methodology to reliably estimate a market risk premium and have excluded a market risk premium from our determination of expected cash flows for capping, closure and post-closure liability.
We discount our capping, closure and post-closure costs using our credit-adjusted, risk-free rate of 9%. The credit-adjusted, risk-free rate is based on the risk-free interest rate on obligations of similar maturity adjusted for our own credit rating. Changes in our credit-adjusted, risk-free rate do not change recorded liabilities, but subsequently recognized obligations are measured using the revised credit-adjusted, risk-free rate.
Accretion expense is necessary to increase the accrued capping, closure and post-closure accrual balance to its future, or undiscounted, value. To accomplish this, we accrete our capping, closure and post-closure accrual balance using the credit-adjusted, risk-free rate of 9% and charge this accretion as an operating expense in that period.
We charged approximately $33.3 million and $11.1 million, or an average of $0.58 and $0.54 per ton consumed, related to accretion of the capping, closure and post-closure liabilities during the nine and three months ended September 30, 2003. Accretion expense for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2002 would have been $31.6 million and $10.5 million or an average of $0.59 and $0.55 per ton consumed if we would have been accounting for capping, closure and post-closure obligations under SFAS 143 since January 1, 2002. Changes in estimates of costs or disposal capacity are treated on a prospective basis for operating landfills and are recorded immediately for closed landfills.
Environmental costs -
We engage independent environmental consulting firms to assist us in conducting environmental assessments of existing landfills or other properties, and in connection with companies acquired from third parties.
We cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts for environmental liabilities. We make estimates of our potential liabilities in consultation with our independent environmental engineers and legal counsel. These estimates require assumptions about future events due to a number of uncertainties including the extent of the contamination, the appropriate remedy, the financial viability of other potentially responsible parties and the final apportionment of responsibility among the potentially responsible parties. Where we have concluded that our estimated share of potential liabilities is probable, a provision has been made in the consolidated financial statements.
23
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our ultimate liabilities for environmental matters may differ from the estimates used in our assessment to date. We periodically evaluate the recorded liabilities as additional information becomes available to ascertain whether the accrued liabilities are adequate. We have determined that the recorded undiscounted liability for environmental matters as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 of approximately $345.2 million and $365.1 million, respectively, represents the most probable outcome of these contingent matters. We do not reduce our estimated obligations for proceeds from other potentially responsible parties or insurance companies. If receipt is probable, proceeds are recorded as an offset to environmental expense in operating income. There were no significant recovery receivables outstanding as of September 30, 2003 or December 31, 2002. We do not expect that adjustments to estimates, which are reasonably possible in the near term and that may result in changes to recorded amounts, will have a material effect on our consolidated liquidity, financial position or results of operations. However, we believe that it is reasonably possible the ultimate outcome of environmental matters, excluding capping, closure and post-closure could result in approximately $20 million of additional liability.
The following table shows the activity and balances related to environmental accruals and for capping, closure and post-closure accruals related to open and closed landfills from December 31, 2002 through September 30, 2003 (in thousands):
Balance at | Charges to | Other | Balance at | |||||||||||||||||
12/31/02 | Expense | Charges(1) | Payments | 9/30/03 | ||||||||||||||||
Environmental accruals |
$ | 365,114 | $ | | $ | (2,463 | ) | $ | (17,498 | ) | $ | 345,153 | ||||||||
Open landfills capping, closure
and post-closure accruals |
336,828 | 21,021 | (253 | ) | (7,652 | ) | 349,944 | |||||||||||||
Closed landfills capping, closure
and post-closure accruals |
257,975 | 12,256 | (76,404 | ) | (18,935 | ) | 174,892 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 959,917 | $ | 33,277 | $ | (79,120 | ) | $ | (44,085 | ) | $ | 869,989 | ||||||||
(1) | Amounts consist primarily of liabilities related to acquired and divested companies, the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the adoption of SFAS 143 and the recognition of amounts accrued for capping, closure and post-closure liability to landfill asset during the period. | |
8. | Series A Preferred Stock Exchange |
On July 31, 2003, we announced that we reached an agreement with the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock to exchange all of their shares for shares of our common stock. The Series A Preferred Stock had a stated value of $1.309 billion at September 30, 2003, which represents the original issuance amount plus cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends. The liquidation preference on the Series A Preferred Stock will continue to increase by the 6.5% cumulative dividend until the completion of the transaction. We have agreed to exchange all of the Series A Preferred Stock outstanding for 110.5 million shares of common stock. If the exchange is approved by our shareholders, no additional common shares will be issued for the increase in liquidation preference for the period of July 31, 2003 through the date the exchange is completed. We expect that our outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis after the exchange is completed will be approximately 350 million shares and that we will eliminate approximately $90 million in dividend payments annually beginning July 2004.
The offer to exchange was approved by a special committee of non-affiliated, independent directors of our Board of Directors and was approved by the full Board of Directors. The Special Committee was advised by Goldman, Sachs and Co. in connection with this transaction. The completion of this transaction is subject to certain approvals, including approval by our shareholders. We are currently in the process of obtaining shareholder approval and anticipate a special meeting of the shareholders on December 18, 2003. We have received lender consent and the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have agreed to vote in favor of the transaction which accounts for approximately 35% of our outstanding shares through direct and beneficial ownership. Under the terms of the exchange agreement, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be restricted from selling the shares of common stock they receive for one year subsequent to the closing. The exchange agreement may be terminated by the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock or us if the exchange has not been completed by December 31, 2003.
24
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In connection with the exchange, we anticipate a non-cash conversion charge, which will be reflected as a reduction to net income available to common shareholders, but will have no effect on total stockholders equity because offsetting amounts are recorded to additional paid in capital. Due to the change in the original conversion terms, we are required to quantify the accounting effect of the change in conversion terms and reduce net income available to common shareholders by the corresponding amount. The market value of the shares of our common stock issued in excess of the shares of common stock that the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock could have converted into under the original terms of the Series A Preferred Stock will be recorded as a non-cash reduction to net income available to common shareholders on the date all conditions for closing have been met. The exact amount of the non-cash conversion charge will not be known until all conditions for closing have been met; however, we expect the amount to be material.
Based on the original conversion price of $18 and the liquidation preference at September 30, 2003 of approximately $1.309 billion, the number of common shares that the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock could have converted into was 72.7 million shares. Assuming we issue 110.5 million common shares under the exchange agreement, the incremental shares issued would be 37.8 million. Using the closing price of our common stock of $10.80 on September 30, 2003, the non-cash reduction to net income available to common shareholders would be approximately $408.3 million. Assuming the same amount of incremental shares issued, if the stock price at the date all conditions for closing have been met is $10.00 or $14.00, the non-cash reduction to net income available to common shareholders would be approximately $378.0 million or $529.3 million, respectively.
25
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
9. | Net Income Per Common Share |
Net income per common share is calculated by dividing net income, less dividend requirements on preferred stock, by the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during each period. The computation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
For the Nine Months | For the Three Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share computation: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle, net of tax |
$ | 105,880 | $ | 162,320 | $ | 50,557 | $ | 60,863 | ||||||||
Less: dividends on preferred stock |
71,858 | 57,771 | 26,487 | 19,779 | ||||||||||||
Income available to common
shareholders from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle, net of tax |
$ | 34,022 | $ | 104,549 | $ | 24,070 | $ | 41,084 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares
outstanding |
198,253 | 190,193 | 202,991 | 190,349 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle,
net of tax |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.22 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share computation: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle, net of tax |
$ | 105,880 | $ | 162,320 | $ | 50,557 | $ | 60,863 | ||||||||
Less: dividends on preferred
stock |
71,858 | 57,771 | 26,487 | 19,779 | ||||||||||||
Income available to common
shareholders from continuing
operations before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle, net of tax |
$ | 34,022 | $ | 104,549 | $ | 24,070 | $ | 41,084 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares
outstanding |
198,253 | 190,193 | 202,991 | 190,349 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock, stock options,
warrants and contingently issuable shares |
3,312 | 3,280 | 3,897 | 2,368 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common and common
equivalent shares outstanding |
201,565 | 193,473 | 206,888 | 192,717 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share from continuing
operations before
cumulative effect of
change in
accounting principle,
net of tax |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
26
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In calculating earnings per share, we have not assumed conversion of the following securities into common shares since the effects of those conversions would not be dilutive (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Series A Preferred Stock |
70,401 | 66,005 | 71,523 | 67,057 | ||||||||||||
Series C Preferred Stock |
21,787 | | 34,057 | | ||||||||||||
Stock options |
14,660 | 10,809 | 9,512 | 13,998 |
10. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Litigation
We are subject to extensive and evolving laws and regulations and have implemented our own environmental safeguards to respond to regulatory requirements. In the normal course of conducting our operations, we may become involved in legal and administrative proceedings. Some of these actions may result in fines, penalties or judgments against us, which may have an impact on earnings for a particular period. We accrue for litigation and regulatory compliance contingencies when such costs are probable and can reasonably be estimated. We expect that matters in process at September 30, 2003, which have not been accrued in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated liquidity, financial position or results of operations.
Employment agreements
We have employment agreements with certain of our executive officers for periods up to three years. Under these agreements, if an executive is terminated in some circumstances, we may be obligated to pay the executive an amount equal to the largest annual bonus paid to the executive for any of the three years preceding the date of termination and to continue making base salary payments through the term of the agreement. Additionally, under certain circumstances, including a change in control, as defined in the employment agreements, we have agreed to pay severance amounts equal to a multiple of defined compensation. If a termination occurs in conjunction with a change in control as defined in the employment agreements, we are obligated to pay an additional amount equal to two times the sum of the executives base salary on the date of termination and the bonus paid to the executive for the previous year.
In addition, for certain executives, if an executives employment is terminated under certain circumstance, the executive may be entitled to continued medical, dental and/or vision coverage, continued vesting in his PARSAP awards and continued vesting and exercisability of his stock options, and continued coverage under our directors and officers liability insurance, among other matters. Certain executives may be entitled to retirement payments.
Financial assurances
We are required to provide financial assurances to governmental agencies under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for closure and post-closure costs, and performance under certain collection, landfill and transfer station contracts. We satisfy the financial assurance requirements by providing performance bonds, letters of credit, insurance policies or trust deposits. Additionally, we are required to provide financial assurances for our self-insurance program and collateral required for certain performance obligations. During 2003, we expect no material increase in financial assurance obligations.
27
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At September 30, 2003, we had the following financial assurance instruments outstanding (in thousands):
Landfill | ||||||||||||||||||||
Closure/ | Contract | Risk/Casualty | Collateral for | |||||||||||||||||
Post-Closure | Performance | Insurance | Obligations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance Policies |
$ | 909,168 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 909,168 | ||||||||||
Surety Bonds |
382,094 | 547,961 | | | 930,055 | |||||||||||||||
Trust Deposits |
73,732 | | | | 73,732 | |||||||||||||||
Letters of Credit (1) |
249,076 | 68,728 | 253,518 | 265,839 | 837,161 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,614,070 | $ | 616,689 | $ | 253,518 | $ | 265,839 | $ | 2,750,116 | ||||||||||
(1) At September 30, 2003, these amounts were issued under the 2003 Revolver and the institutional letter of credit facility under our 2003 Credit Facility.
These financial instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not debt of the company. Since we currently have no liability for these financial assurance instruments, they are not reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The underlying obligations of the financial assurance instruments would be valued and recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets if it is probable that we would be unable to perform our obligations under the financial assurance contracts. We do not expect this to occur.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations, other than financial assurance instruments discussed above which are not debt of the Company. We have no transactions or obligations with related parties that are not disclosed, consolidated into or reflected in our reported results of operations or financial position. We do not guarantee any third-party debt.
Guarantees
We enter into contracts in the normal course of business that include indemnification clauses. Indemnifications relating to known liabilities are recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements based on our best estimate of required future payments. Certain of these indemnifications relate to contingent events or occurrences, such as the imposition of additional taxes due to a change in the tax law or adverse interpretation of the tax law, and indemnifications made in divestiture agreements where we indemnify the buyer for liabilities that may become known in the future but that relate to our activities prior to the divestiture. As of September 30, 2003, we estimate the contingent obligations associated with these indemnifications to be deminimus.
We have entered into agreements to guarantee to property owners the value of certain property that is adjacent to landfills. These agreements have varying terms over varying periods. Prior to December 31, 2002, liabilities associated with these guarantees have been accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Agreements modified or entered into subsequent to December 31, 2002 are accounted for in accordance with FIN 45.
28
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Contingencies
We are currently under examination by various state and federal taxing authorities for certain tax years. A federal income tax audit for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is ongoing. A federal income tax audit for BFIs tax years ended September 30, 1996 through July 30, 1999 is completed with the exception of the matter discussed below.
Prior to our acquisition of BFI on July 30, 1999, BFI operating companies, as part of a risk management initiative to effectively manage and reduce costs associated with certain liabilities, contributed assets and existing environmental and self-insurance liabilities to six fully consolidated BFI risk management companies (RMCs) in exchange for stock representing a minority ownership interest in the RMCs. Subsequently, on July 9, 1999, the BFI operating companies sold that stock in the RMCs to third parties at fair market value which resulted in a capital loss of $900 million for tax purposes, calculated as the excess of the tax basis of the stock over the cash proceeds received. The capital loss was claimed in the BFI tax return for the period from October 1, 1998 to July 30, 1999. The primary argument advanced by the IRS for disallowing the capital loss was that the tax basis of the stock of the RMCs received by the BFI operating companies was required to be reduced by the amount of liabilities assumed even though such liabilities were merely contingent. Under the IRS view, there was no capital loss on the sale of the stock since the tax basis of the stock approximately equaled the proceeds received. On January 18, 2001, the IRS designated this type of transaction and other similar transactions as a potentially abusive tax shelter under the IRS regulations.
During 2002, we received notification from the IRS disallowing all of this capital loss. If such disallowance is upheld, we estimate it could have a federal and state income tax effect of up to $310 million plus accrued interest through September 30, 2003 of approximately $50 million. We also received a notification from the IRS assessing a penalty of between 20% and 40% of the additional income tax resulting from the disallowance.
We continue to believe our position is well supported and we will vigorously contest the disallowance. Because of several meritorious defenses, we believe the successful assertion of penalties is remote. The resolution of this matter may entail efforts including administrative appeals and litigation, which could extend over several years. An unfavorable result could require future cash expenditures but should have minimal, if any, impact on our consolidated results of operations as the amount of the tax effected disallowance and interest have been fully reserved on our consolidated balance sheet.
11. | Segment Reporting |
Our revenues are derived from one industry segment, which includes the collection, transfer, recycling and disposal of non-hazardous solid waste. We evaluate performance based on several factors, of which the primary financial measure is operating income before depreciation and amortization. Consistent with our decentralized operating structure, management uses operating income before depreciation and amortization to evaluate field operating performance, since it approximates operational cash flows and is a profit measure of components that are within the control of the operating units. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
We manage our operations through four geographic operating segments: Eastern, Southern, Central and Western. Each area is responsible for managing several vertically integrated operations, which are comprised of three regions. The tables below reflect certain geographic information relating to our continuing operations for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income | Operating income | |||||||||||||||
before depreciation | before depreciation | |||||||||||||||
Revenues | and amortization | Revenues | and amortization | |||||||||||||
Eastern |
$ | 1,099,414 | $ | 306,856 | $ | 1,118,551 | $ | 332,126 | ||||||||
Southern |
918,035 | 323,272 | 927,153 | 339,710 | ||||||||||||
Central |
1,068,489 | 356,043 | 1,052,518 | 383,893 | ||||||||||||
Western |
917,947 | 324,174 | 880,610 | 310,959 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,003,885 | $ | 1,310,345 | $ | 3,978,832 | $ | 1,366,688 | ||||||||
29
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income | Operating income | |||||||||||||||
before depreciation | before depreciation | |||||||||||||||
Revenues | and amortization | Revenues | and amortization | |||||||||||||
Eastern |
$ | 381,475 | $ | 111,155 | $ | 388,294 | $ | 118,857 | ||||||||
Southern |
312,742 | 111,549 | 312,811 | 112,337 | ||||||||||||
Central |
369,719 | 123,544 | 366,129 | 128,931 | ||||||||||||
Western |
319,470 | 118,256 | 305,335 | 110,756 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,383,406 | $ | 464,504 | $ | 1,372,569 | $ | 470,881 | ||||||||
Reconciliation of reportable segment primary financial measure to income from continuing operations before income taxes and minority interest (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Total operating income before depreciation and
amortization for reportable segments |
$ | 1,310,345 | $ | 1,366,688 | $ | 464,504 | $ | 470,881 | ||||||||
Other
(1) |
(89,786 | ) | (69,360 | ) | (38,138 | ) | (12,348 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(409,731 | ) | (364,413 | ) | (140,784 | ) | (124,449 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(621,861 | ) | (652,901 | ) | (194,471 | ) | (228,682 | ) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations before
|
||||||||||||||||
income
taxes and minority interest
|
$ | 188,967 | $ | 280,014 | $ | 91,111 | $ | 105,402 | ||||||||
(1) Amounts relate primarily to our subsidiaries which provide services throughout the organization and not on an area basis. |
Reconciliation of reportable segment revenues to external revenues from continuing operations (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 4,003,885 | $ | 3,978,832 | $ | 1,383,406 | $ | 1,372,569 | |||||||||
Other (1) |
28,404 | 21,139 | 10,135 | 7,390 | |||||||||||||
Total external revenues from continuing
operations |
$ | 4,032,289 | $ | 3,999,971 | $ | 1,393,541 | $ | 1,379,959 | |||||||||
(1) Amounts relate primarily to our subsidiaries which provide services throughout the organization and not on an area basis. |
Amounts and percentages of our total revenue from continuing operations attributable to services provided (in thousands, except percentages):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collection |
$ | 3,012,624 | 60.5 | % | $ | 3,038,248 | 62.2 | % | $ | 1,024,595 | 59.4 | % | $ | 1,033,246 | 61.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Disposal(1) |
1,664,650 | 33.4 | 1,549,163 | 31.7 | 590,518 | 34.3 | 545,948 | 32.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recycling |
183,442 | 3.7 | 168,198 | 3.5 | 64,041 | 3.7 | 62,557 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
121,284 | 2.4 | 127,748 | 2.6 | 45,132 | 2.6 | 45,231 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
4,982,000 | 100.0 | % | 4,883,357 | 100.0 | % | 1,724,286 | 100.0 | % | 1,686,982 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
(949,711 | ) | (883,386 | ) | (330,745 | ) | (307,023 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reported
Revenues |
$ | 4,032,289 | $ | 3,999,971 | $ | 1,393,541 | $ | 1,379,959 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Revenues from landfills and transfer stations are included in disposal. |
30
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The revenues and operating income before depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations by geographic location are as follows (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income | (loss) before | |||||||||||||||
before depreciation | depreciation and | |||||||||||||||
Revenues | and amortization | Revenues | amortization | |||||||||||||
Eastern |
$ | 45,683 | $ | 7,431 | $ | 56,703 | $ | (333 | ) | |||||||
Southern |
67,914 | 7,902 | 80,008 | 9,488 | ||||||||||||
Westem |
6,368 | 1,685 | 10,099 | 2,020 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 119,965 | $ | 17,018 | $ | 146,810 | $ | 11,175 | ||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income | (loss) before | |||||||||||||||
before depreciation | depreciation and | |||||||||||||||
Revenues | and amortization | Revenues | amortization | |||||||||||||
Eastern |
$ | 9,544 | $ | 1,027 | $ | 19,345 | $ | (6,536 | ) | |||||||
Southern |
18,983 | 1,760 | 26,444 | 3,769 | ||||||||||||
Western |
| 33 | 3,438 | 604 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 28,527 | $ | 2,820 | $ | 49,227 | $ | (2,163 | ) | |||||||
12. | Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. |
The 1998 Senior Notes, 1999 Notes, 2001 Senior Notes and 2002 Senior Notes issued by Allied NA (our wholly-owned subsidiary) and certain debt of BFI (all of which are no longer registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are guaranteed by us. All guarantees (including those of the guarantor subsidiaries) are full, unconditional and joint and several of Allied NAs and BFIs debt. Presented below are Consolidating Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the related Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002 and Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. (Parent), Allied NA (Issuer), the guarantor subsidiaries (Guarantors) and the subsidiaries which are not guarantors (Non-guarantors):
31
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(in millions)
September 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 203.3 | $ | 3.1 | $ | | $ | 210.2 | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| | 208.6 | 500.4 | | 709.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid and other current
assets |
| 0.3 | 99.8 | 1.3 | | 101.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| | 72.3 | 5.9 | | 78.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
0.1 | 4.0 | 584.0 | 510.7 | | 1,098.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Property and equipment,
net |
| | 3,933.4 | 60.5 | | 3,993.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net |
| | 8,380.4 | 72.4 | | 8,452.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
3,197.2 | 13,450.3 | | | (16,647.5 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
| 117.3 | 59.6 | 153.4 | (85.1 | ) | 245.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,197.3 | $ | 13,571.6 | $ | 12,957.4 | $ | 797.0 | $ | (16,732.6 | ) | $ | 13,790.7 | ||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-
term debt |
$ | | $ | 263.1 | $ | 5.3 | $ | | $ | | $ | 268.4 | |||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 0.8 | 423.5 | 4.4 | | 428.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of accrued
capping, closure,
post-closure and
environmental costs |
| | 96.0 | | | 96.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest |
| 204.3 | 13.1 | 0.2 | | 217.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
48.9 | 21.4 | 111.2 | 169.3 | | 350.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unearned revenue |
| | 225.6 | 2.4 | | 228.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
48.9 | 489.6 | 874.7 | 176.3 | | 1,589.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less
current portion |
| 6,884.9 | 912.7 | 138.9 | | 7,936.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| | 91.9 | (9.9 | ) | | 82.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued capping, closure,
post-closure and
environmental costs,
less current portion |
| | 771.1 | 2.9 | | 774.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Due to/(from) parent |
610.8 | 2,957.7 | (3,733.3 | ) | 164.8 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other long-term
obligations |
16.2 | 66.8 | 838.9 | 50.5 | (85.1 | ) | 887.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commitments and
contingencies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series A senior
convertible
preferred stock |
1,308.5 | | | | | 1,308.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
1,212.9 | 3,172.6 | 13,201.4 | 273.5 | (16,647.5 | ) | 1,212.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
$ | 3,197.3 | $ | 13,571.6 | $ | 12,957.4 | $ | 797.0 | $ | (16,732.6 | ) | $ | 13,790.7 | ||||||||||||
32
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
(in millions)
December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 5.4 | $ | 172.3 | $ | 1.6 | $ | | $ | 179.4 | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| | 654.9 | 12.2 | | 667.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid and other current
assets |
| | 83.7 | 37.5 | | 121.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| | 100.2 | 4.2 | | 104.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
0.1 | 5.4 | 1,011.1 | 55.5 | | 1,072.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Property and equipment,
net |
| | 4,009.5 | 20.2 | | 4,029.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net |
| | 8,458.1 | 72.4 | | 8,530.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
3,510.7 | 12,527.4 | | | (16,038.1 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
| 146.7 | 134.6 | 113.7 | (98.4 | ) | 296.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,510.8 | $ | 12,679.5 | $ | 13,613.3 | $ | 261.8 | $ | (16,136.5 | ) | $ | 13,928.9 | ||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | | $ | | $ | 163.5 | $ | | $ | | $ | 163.5 | |||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 0.8 | 416.4 | 4.6 | | 421.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of accrued
capping, closure,
post-closure and
environmental costs |
| | 95.2 | | | 95.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Accrued interest |
| 157.2 | 24.9 | | | 182.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
50.4 | | 174.5 | 139.3 | | 364.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unearned revenue |
| | 220.6 | 2.4 | | 223.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
50.4 | 158.0 | 1,095.1 | 146.3 | | 1,449.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less
current portion |
| 7,807.0 | 911.6 | | | 8,718.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| | 61.3 | (9.9 | ) | | 51.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued capping, closure,
post- closure and
environmental costs |
| | 862.1 | 2.6 | | 864.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Due to/(from) parent |
1,509.2 | 1,103.6 | (2,554.8 | ) | (58.0 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Other long-term obligations |
15.2 | 125.8 | 865.8 | | (98.4 | ) | 908.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commitments and
contingencies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Series A senior
convertible preferred
stock |
1,246.9 | | | | | 1,246.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
689.1 | 3,485.1 | 12,372.2 | 180.8 | (16,038.1 | ) | 689.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
$ | 3,510.8 | $ | 12,679.5 | $ | 13,613.3 | $ | 261.8 | $ | (16,136.5 | ) | $ | 13,928.9 | ||||||||||||
33
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in millions)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 3,891.8 | $ | 140.5 | $ | | $ | 4,032.3 | |||||||||||||
Cost of operations |
| (0.1 | ) | 2,341.7 | 111.0 | | 2,452.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
11.7 | | 337.9 | 9.5 | | 359.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| | 406.7 | 3.1 | | 409.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(11.7 | ) | 0.1 | 805.5 | 16.9 | | 810.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
(112.5 | ) | (477.0 | ) | | | 589.5 | | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (income)
and other |
0.9 | 563.9 | 62.3 | (5.3 | ) | | 621.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest
expense (income) |
(41.0 | ) | 11.2 | 34.8 | (5.0 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Management fees |
(3.8 | ) | | 3.2 | 0.6 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income
taxes |
144.7 | (98.0 | ) | 705.2 | 26.6 | (589.5 | ) | 189.0 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
13.3 | (230.0 | ) | 288.0 | 10.4 | | 81.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | 1.4 | | | 1.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing
operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
131.4 | 132.0 | 415.8 | 16.2 | (589.5 | ) | 105.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued
operations,
net of tax |
| | (3.7 | ) | | | (3.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting
change, net of tax |
29.2 | | 29.2 | | (29.2 | ) | 29.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
160.6 | 132.0 | 441.3 | 16.2 | (618.7 | ) | 131.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(71.8 | ) | | | | | (71.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income
available to common
shareholders |
$ | 88.8 | $ | 132.0 | $ | 441.3 | $ | 16.2 | $ | (618.7 | ) | $ | 59.6 | ||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,347.5 | $ | 46.1 | $ | | $ | 1,393.6 | |||||||||||||
Cost of operations |
| (0.1 | ) | 811.1 | 35.8 | | 846.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
4.8 | (0.3 | ) | 113.2 | 2.7 | | 120.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| | 139.8 | 1.0 | | 140.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(4.8 | ) | 0.4 | 283.4 | 6.6 | | 285.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
(35.8 | ) | (260.1 | ) | | | 295.9 | | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (income)
and other |
(44.8 | ) | 227.0 | 14.6 | (2.3 | ) | | 194.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest
expense (income) |
(12.9 | ) | 20.6 | (5.5 | ) | (2.2 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
Management fees |
(1.3 | ) | | 1.2 | 0.1 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income
taxes |
90.0 | 12.9 | 273.1 | 11.0 | (295.9 | ) | 91.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
22.4 | (98.9 | ) | 112.4 | 4.1 | | 40.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | 0.5 | | | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing
operations |
67.6 | 111.8 | 160.2 | 6.9 | (295.9 | ) | 50.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued
operations,
net of tax |
| | (12.2 | ) | | | (12.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
67.6 | 111.8 | 148.0 | 6.9 | (295.9 | ) | 38.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(26.4 | ) | | | | | (26.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income
available to common
shareholders |
$ | 41.2 | $ | 111.8 | $ | 148.0 | $ | 6.9 | $ | (295.9 | ) | $ | 12.0 | ||||||||||||
34
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(in millions)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 3,837.0 | $ | 163.0 | $ | | $ | 4,000.0 | |||||||||||||
Cost of operations |
| | 2,235.5 | 116.0 | | 2,351.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
7.0 | 0.4 | 338.2 | 5.6 | | 351.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| | 350.8 | 13.6 | | 364.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(7.0 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 912.5 | 27.8 | | 932.9 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
(129.1 | ) | (458.3 | ) | | | 587.4 | | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (income)
and other |
1.1 | 568.9 | 85.1 | (2.2 | ) | | 652.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest
expense (income) |
(59.1 | ) | (24.8 | ) | 83.0 | 0.9 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Management fees |
(3.8 | ) | | 3.3 | 0.5 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income
taxes |
183.9 | (86.2 | ) | 741.1 | 28.6 | (587.4 | ) | 280.0 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
22.4 | (215.1 | ) | 295.8 | 12.9 | | 116.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | 1.7 | | | 1.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing
operations |
161.5 | 128.9 | 443.6 | 15.7 | (587.4 | ) | 162.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued
operations,
net of tax |
| | (0.8 | ) | | | (0.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
161.5 | 128.9 | 442.8 | 15.7 | (587.4 | ) | 161.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(57.8 | ) | | | | | (57.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income
available to common
shareholders |
$ | 103.7 | $ | 128.9 | $ | 442.8 | $ | 15.7 | $ | (587.4 | ) | $ | 103.7 | ||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,335.6 | $ | 44.4 | $ | | $ | 1,380.0 | |||||||||||||
Cost of operations |
| | 763.3 | 40.9 | | 804.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
2.2 | 0.1 | 113.2 | 1.8 | | 117.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| | 123.4 | 1.0 | | 124.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(2.2 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 335.7 | 0.7 | | 334.1 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
(46.2 | ) | (159.1 | ) | | | 205.3 | | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense (income)
and other |
0.2 | 194.5 | 36.7 | (2.7 | ) | | 228.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest
expense (income) |
(19.7 | ) | (8.3 | ) | 27.7 | 0.3 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Management fees |
(1.2 | ) | | 1.0 | 0.2 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income
taxes |
64.7 | (27.2 | ) | 270.3 | 2.9 | (205.3 | ) | 105.4 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
7.6 | (73.6 | ) | 108.2 | 1.7 | | 43.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Minority interest |
| | 0.6 | | | 0.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing
operations |
57.1 | 46.4 | 161.5 | 1.2 | (205.3 | ) | 60.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued
operations,
net of tax |
| | (3.8 | ) | | | (3.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income |
57.1 | 46.4 | 157.7 | 1.2 | (205.3 | ) | 57.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(19.8 | ) | | | | | (19.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income
available to common
shareholders |
$ | 37.3 | $ | 46.4 | $ | 157.7 | $ | 1.2 | $ | (205.3 | ) | $ | 37.3 | ||||||||||||
35
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash (used for) provided by
operating activities from
continuing operations |
$ | (97.4 | ) | $ | (1,428.6 | ) | $ | 2,070.9 | $ | 84.7 | $ | | $ | 629.6 | |||||||||||
Investing activities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceed from divestitures
(cost of acquisitions), net of
cash divested/acquired |
| | 62.5 | | | 62.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of fixed
assets |
| | 14.5 | | | 14.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures, excluding
acquisitions |
| | (344.8 | ) | (5.7 | ) | | (350.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
| | (11.7 | ) | | | (11.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Change in deferred acquisitions
costs, notes receivable and
other |
| | (5.4 | ) | | | (5.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash used for investing activities
from continuing operations |
| | (284.9 | ) | (5.7 | ) | | (290.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Financing activities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of
Series C Preferred Stock |
333.1 | | | | | 333.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt,
net of issuance costs |
| 2,529.4 | | 158.3 | | 2,687.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
| (3,232.3 | ) | (162.6 | ) | (19.4 | ) | | (3,414.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Payments of Series C
Preferred Stock cash dividend |
(4.9 | ) | | | | | (4.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Change in disbursement
account |
| | (3.4 | ) | | | (3.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of
common stock and exercise of
stock options and other |
97.4 | | | | | 97.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany between issuer
and subsidiary |
(328.2 | ) | 2,129.8 | (1,585.2 | ) | (216.4 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||
Cash (used for) provided by
financing activities from
continuing operations |
97.4 | 1,426.9 | (1,751.2 | ) | (77.5 | ) | | (304.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash used for discontinued
operations |
| | (3.8 | ) | | | (3.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents |
| (1.7 | ) | 31.0 | 1.5 | | 30.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
beginning of period |
0.1 | 5.4 | 172.3 | 1.6 | | 179.4 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents,
end of period |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 3.7 | $ | 203.3 | $ | 3.1 | $ | | $ | 210.2 | |||||||||||||
36
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Guarantors | Non-Guarantors | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash (used for) provided by operating
activities from continuing operations |
$ | (2.6 | ) | $ | 74.8 | $ | 643.7 | $ | 45.2 | $ | | $ | 761.1 | ||||||||||||
Investing activities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from divestitures
(cost of acquisitions), net of
cash divested/acquired |
| | (27.1 | ) | | | (27.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
| | 21.4 | 1.4 | | 22.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures, excluding
acquisitions |
| | (233.2 | ) | (197.1 | ) | | (430.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
| | (17.0 | ) | | | (17.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Change in deferred acquisition costs,
notes receivable and other |
| | (12.4 | ) | | | (12.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash used for investing activities from
continuing operations |
| | (268.3 | ) | (195.7 | ) | | (464.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Financing activities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term debt, net of
issuance costs |
| 484.2 | (2.3 | ) | 192.7 | | 674.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
| (692.1 | ) | (264.9 | ) | (12.0 | ) | | (969.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Change in disbursement account |
| | (77.0 | ) | | | (77.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
and exercise of stock options and other |
2.6 | | | | | 2.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany and capital funding
between issuer and subsidiary |
| 129.3 | (67.6 | ) | (61.7 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Cash (used for) provided by financing
Activities from continuing operations |
2.6 | (78.6 | ) | (411.8 | ) | 119.0 | | (368.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by discontinued
operations |
| | 13.8 | | | 13.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Decrease in cash and cash
equivalents |
| (3.8 | ) | (22.6 | ) | (31.5 | ) | | (57.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
period |
0.1 | 8.9 | 114.7 | 34.1 | | 157.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 5.1 | $ | 92.1 | $ | 2.6 | $ | | $ | 99.9 | |||||||||||||
37
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
13. Subsequent Events
In October 2003, we announced we were commencing the process of seeking modifications to our 2003 Credit Facility to reduce the interest rates on the term loans and to favorably revise certain financial covenants to provide greater operating flexibility. Such modifications are contingent on the approval of the lenders under our 2003 Credit Facility and there can be no assurance that the lenders will approve the modifications.
In November 2003, we issued $350 million of 6.5% senior notes due 2010 in a private placement under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. We will use the proceeds from the sale of these notes to repurchase $350 million of our senior subordinated notes through open market repurchases or otherwise. We expect to use additional borrowings under the 2003 Revolver to pay for costs associated with the issuance of these senior notes. We will initiate the registration of these notes with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933 as soon as it is practical.
38
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, included elsewhere herein.
Introduction
Allied Waste Industries, Inc. (Allied or we), a Delaware corporation, is the second largest non-hazardous solid waste management company in the United States. We operate as a vertically integrated company providing collection, transfer, disposal and recycling services for approximately 10 million residential, commercial and industrial customers. We serve customers through a network of 323 collection companies, 168 transfer stations, 169 active landfills, and 61 recycling facilities within 38 states.
Our management philosophy utilizes a decentralized operating model, with centralized financial and management controls. We believe that this model allows us to maximize the opportunities in each market that we operate and has largely contributed to our ability to operate the business efficiently, while maintaining proper controls over our operations. We implement this philosophy through a corporate, area, region and district infrastructure.
Our organization is divided into four areas: Eastern, Southern, Central and Western. The areas are further divided into twelve regions. Consistent with the vertical integration business model, each region is organized into several operating districts and each district contains a group of specific site operations. Each of our regions, and substantially all of our districts include collection, transfer, recycling and disposal services, which facilitates efficient and cost effective waste handling and allows the regions and districts to maximize the efficiencies from the internalization of waste.
General
The major components of our business strategy are intended to maximize operating cash flows to enable us to continue to repay debt. These components are: (1) operating vertically integrated non-hazardous solid waste service businesses with a high rate of waste internalization (which is the process of transferring and disposing of waste we collect at our own landfills); (2) managing these businesses locally with a strong operations focus on customer service; (3) maintaining or improving our market position through internal development and incremental acquisitions; and (4) maintaining the financial capacity and administrative systems and controls to support on-going operations and future growth.
Revenues. Our revenues result primarily from fees charged to customers for waste collection, transfer, recycling and disposal services. We also generate revenue from the sale of recycled commodities. We record revenue as services are provided, including instances where services are billed in advance of the service being provided. The following tables show the percentage of our total reported revenues from continuing operations by geographic area and by service line.
39
Revenues by Area (in thousands, except percentages) :
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Eastern |
$ | 1,099,414 | 27.3 | % | $ | 1,118,551 | 28.0 | % | |||||||||
Southern |
918,035 | 22.8 | 927,153 | 23.2 | |||||||||||||
Central |
1,068,489 | 26.5 | 1,052,518 | 26.3 | |||||||||||||
Western |
917,947 | 22.7 | 880,610 | 22.0 | |||||||||||||
Other (1) |
28,404 | 0.7 | 21,139 | 0.5 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 4,032,289 | 100.0 | % | $ | 3,999,971 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
(1) | Amounts relate primarily to our subsidiaries which provide services throughout the organization. | |
Revenues by Service Line (in thousands, except percentages): |
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Collection(1) |
$ | 3,012,624 | 60.5 | % | $ | 3,038,248 | 62.2 | % | ||||||||
Disposal (2) |
1,664,650 | 33.4 | 1,549,163 | 31.7 | ||||||||||||
Recycling |
183,442 | 3.7 | 168,198 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||
Other |
121,284 | 2.4 | 127,748 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||
4,982,000 | 100.0 | % | 4,883,357 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Intercompany |
(949,711 | ) | (883,386 | ) | ||||||||||||
Reported revenues |
$ | 4,032,289 | $ | 3,999,971 | ||||||||||||
(1) | For 2003 and 2002 respectively, collection revenues consist of 71% and 72% revenues from commercial customers and 29% and 28% revenues from residential customers. | |
(2) | Revenues from landfills and transfer stations are included in disposal. |
Operating Expenses. Cost of operations includes expenses related to labor, repairs and maintenance, equipment and facility rent, fuel, utilities and taxes, environmental compliance and remediation, safety and insurance, and costs of independent haulers transporting our waste to the disposal site. Additionally, cost of operations includes disposal costs which consists of third-party disposal costs, landfill taxes, host community fees, landfill royalty payments, landfill site maintenance, landfill financial assurance costs, fuel and other equipment operating expenses and provision and accretion for capping, closure and post-closure liability. Gains or losses on sale of assets used in our operations are also included in cost of operations.
Selling, general and administrative expenses include compensation and overhead for corporate and field general management, accounting and finance, legal, management information systems and clerical and administrative departments, in addition to sales, investor and community relations and provisions for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable.
Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation of fixed assets and amortization costs associated with the acquisition, development, capping, closing and monitoring of landfill assets and intangible assets. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of buildings and improvements (30-40 years), vehicles and equipment (3-15 years), containers and compactors (5-10 years) and furniture and office equipment (3-8 years). Amortization of landfill assets is based upon the consumption of waste.
Critical Accounting Judgments and Estimates
We identified and discussed our critical accounting judgments and estimates in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and discussed an update to those judgments and estimates in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, they are based upon information available at the time of the valuations. Actual results may differ significantly from estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
40
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the percentage relationship that the various items bear to revenues for the periods indicated.
Nine Months Ended September 30, | Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Statement of Operations Data: |
|||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Cost of operations |
60.8 | 58.8 | 60.8 | 58.3 | |||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
8.9 | 8.8 | 8.6 | 8.5 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
10.2 | 9.1 | 10.1 | 9.0 | |||||||||||||
Operating income |
20.1 | 23.3 | 20.5 | 24.2 | |||||||||||||
Interest
expense and other |
15.4 | 16.3 | 14.0 | 16.6 | |||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
4.7 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 7.6 | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
2.0 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.2 | |||||||||||||
Minority interest |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||
Income before discontinued operations
and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle |
2.7 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 4.4 | |||||||||||||
Discontinued operations, net of tax |
(0.1 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change,
net of tax |
0.7 | | | | |||||||||||||
Net income |
3.3 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 4.1 | |||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(1.8 | ) | (1.4 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (1.4 | ) | |||||||||
Net income available to common
shareholders |
1.5 | % | 2.6 | % | 0.9 | % | 2.7 | % | |||||||||
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
During 2003, we have determined that certain operations we have divested or are planned to be divested as part of our previously announced divestiture plan were discontinued operations. The discontinued operations include hauling operations in South Carolina, Georgia and Colorado which were sold at the end of second quarter 2003, hauling, transfer and material recovery facilities in New Jersey which were sold in August 2003 and certain hauling, landfill and material recovery facilities in Florida that were held for sale at September 30, 2003. The sale of the Florida operations was completed in October 2003. Prior period results of these operations have been reclassified to discontinued operations. The following discussion relates to our continuing operations.
Revenues. For the three months ended September 30, 2003, revenues were $1.394 billion compared to the same period in the prior year of $1.380 billion, an increase of 1.0%. Core business revenues on a same store basis increased by $27 million due to an increase in volumes of $36 million, partially offset by a decline in per unit pricing of $9 million. Net divested revenues (excluding amounts included in discontinued operations) were $13 million. Landfill revenues increased as a result of an 8% increase in landfill volumes, partially offset by a slight decline in per unit pricing for the third quarter 2003 when compared with the same period in 2002. Revenue from the collection businesses remained fairly consistent quarter over quarter with an increase in volume offset by a decline in per unit pricing. Commodity revenues increased by $5 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared to the same period of 2002 primarily due to an increase in processing fess associated with a recycling contract. The commodity volumes and per unit average price for our primary commodities declined when comparing 2003 to 2002. The increase in commodity revenues was offset by a comparable net increase in landfill taxes and a decrease in other non-core revenues.
41
For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, revenues were $4.032 billion compared to $4.0 billion for the same period in 2002, an increase of approximately 0.8%. The increase in revenues reflects an increase in core business revenues of $60 million and an increase in commodity revenues and other non-core revenues of $5 million, offset by $33 million of net divested revenues. Core business revenues increased as a result of increased volumes of approximately $87 million, offset by a decline in per unit price of $27 million. During 2003, we have continued to experience pricing pressures as a result of general economic conditions. The increase in commodity revenues is primarily due to an increase in our per unit average price, offset by a decline in volume when compared to the same period in the prior year. The decline in commodity volume is due primarily to the sale or closure of processing facilities.
Cost of Operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, cost of operations was $846.8 million and $2.453 billion compared to $804.2 million and $2.352 billion for the same periods last year, reflecting increases of 5.3% and 4.3%, respectively. Cost of sales as a percent of revenues increased from 58.3% and 58.8% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 to 60.8% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase is primarily attributable to inflationary increases in costs and increases in insurance and financial assurance costs in excess of inflation rates and the incremental in costs associated with increased volumes. These cost increases were offset by a favorable variance for the three and nine month periods of $7 million and $20 million, respectively, in capping, closure and post-closure provision from the change in accounting upon our adoption of SFAS 143.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, selling, general and administrative expenses were $120.4 million and $359.1 million compared to $117.3 million and $351.1 million for the same periods in 2002, an increase of 2.7% and 2.3%, respectively. Third quarter 2003 selling, general and administrative expenses were 8.6% of revenues compared to 8.5% for third quarter 2002. The increase is primarily due to normal inflationary increases in costs and an increase in bad debt expense.
Depreciation and Amortization. For the three months ended September 30, 2003, depreciation and amortization was $140.8 million compared to $124.4 million in 2002, an increase of 13.1%. Depreciation and amortization was $409.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, compared to $364.4 million for the same period in 2002, an increase of 12.4%. As a percentage of revenues, depreciation and amortization expense increased to 10.1% from 9.0% and to 10.2% from 9.1% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2002. The increase is attributable to an increase in landfill amortization as a result of the increase in landfill volumes of approximately 7% for the first nine months of 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002 and the adoption of SFAS 143, which changed our accounting for landfill liabilities and resulted in an increase in landfill assets to be amortized.
Interest expense and other. Interest expense and other was $194.5 million and $228.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Interest expense and other was $621.9 million and $652.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Interest expense and other for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 includes $16.9 million and $70.7 million, respectively, of expense related to the write-off of deferred financing costs and premiums paid in connection with the early repayment of debt. Additionally, included in interest expense and other, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 is $5.4 million and $17.7 million, respectively, of amortization of amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders equity and a gain of $15.4 million and $36.5 million, respectively, related to the change in market value of our de-designated interest rate swap contracts. Due to the unpredictability of the mark to market impact and because we expect to hold these contracts to maturity, we evaluate interest expense and other excluding the effects of de-designation.
42
Interest expense and other for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 before the effect of accounting for de-designated interest rate swap contracts and the costs incurred to early extinguish debt, was $188.4 million and $573.0 million compared to $201.2 million and $612.0 million, representing a decrease of 6.4% for both periods. The decrease is attributable primarily to the repayment of debt from our continued de-leveraging strategy. At September 30, 2003, the interest rate on all of our debt was fixed, 80% directly through a fixed coupon and 20% through interest rate swap contracts.
Income Taxes. Income taxes reflect an effective tax rate of 44.2% and 43.5% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, and 41.9% and 41.7% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. The effective tax rate deviates from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes.
Discontinued Operations. Discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2003 included a $22.1 million pretax loss for the write-down of assets to fair value, offset by a $9.6 million tax benefit. Included in the pretax loss for the quarter is an additional $3.9 million loss ($2.4 million loss after $1.5 million tax benefit) related to the assets held for sale at June 30, 2003 that were divested during third quarter. The additional loss is primarily a result of purchase price adjustments when the assets were divested. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the results for discontinued operations include a loss of approximately $45.5 million ($7.8 million loss after a $37.7 million tax benefit) reflecting the adjustment to fair value for discontinued operations.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle, Net of Tax. Upon adoption of SFAS 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, we recorded a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $29.2 million, net of income tax expense of $19.5 million.
Dividends on Preferred Stock. Dividends on preferred stock were $26.5 million and $71.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, compared to $19.8 million and $57.8 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2002. The increase in the dividends for 2003 compared to 2002 is primarily due to the 6.25% dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock that was issued in April 2003. Dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock are payable in cash. The dividends for both 2003 and 2002 reflect the 6.5% dividend on the liquidation preference of the Series A Preferred Stock issued on July 30, 1999 in connection with the financing of the acquisition of BFI. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock were not paid in cash, instead, the liquidation preference of the preferred stock increased by accrued, but unpaid dividends. The liquidity and capital resources discussion below discusses the anticipated conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock to common stock, including the cumulative dividends that have been accrued.
43
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We meet operational liquidity needs with operating cash flow. When non-operating liquidity needs arise, such as funding our debt maturities and capital expenditure requirements, they are met, if not from remaining operating cash flow, with borrowings under our 2003 Revolver. At September 30, 2003, we had $862.8 million available under the 2003 Revolver.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we used proceeds from the issuance of common stock and the Series C Preferred Stock of $427.5 million, cash provided by continuing operations of $629.6 million, net proceeds from net divestitures of $62.5 million and proceeds from the sale of fixed assets of $14.5 million to:
| fund $350.5 million of capital expenditures, | ||
| reduce debt by $677.3 million, | ||
| increase our cash balance by $30.8 million, and | ||
| fund $75.5 million of other non-operating net cash outflows. |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we used cash provided by continuing operations of $761.2 million, the application of $57.9 million of balance sheet cash and proceeds from the sale of fixed assets of $22.8 million to:
| fund $430.3 million of capital expenditures, | ||
| reduce debt by $280.3 million, | ||
| fund $27.1 million of net acquisitions, | ||
| fund outstanding checks of $77.0 million, and | ||
| fund $27.2 million of other non-operating net cash outflows. |
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities when comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2003 to the same period in 2002 is primarily due to a reduction in earnings and an increase in operating assets. We have historically operated and we expect that we will continue to operate with a working capital deficit. This deficit, in part, is caused by the current portion of our outstanding debt. We regularly use excess available cash from operating and non-operating activities to pay the current portion of our outstanding debt. To the extent excess cash from operations exceeds our scheduled debt maturities, we prepay future maturities. Our financing strategy for market development has been and may continue to utilize cash flow from divestiture activity to repay debt and to fund any acquisition activity. In addition to funding our operational working capital and debt reduction needs, we are committed to investing capital in our asset base.
44
At September 30, 2003, our debt structure consisted primarily of:
| $1.435 billion outstanding under our 2003 Credit Facility, | ||
| $3.875 billion of senior notes issued by AWNA, | ||
| $1.832 billion of senior subordinated notes issued in 1999, | ||
| $1.014 billion of debt assumed in connection with the BFI acquisition, and | ||
| $138.9 million borrowed under the receivables securitization program. |
At September 30, 2003, we had a revolver capacity commitment of $1.5 billion with zero drawn and $637.2 million of letters of credit outstanding under our 2003 Revolver. We had aggregate availability under the 2003 Revolver of approximately $862.8 million for working capital, letters of credit, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes. All amounts under our $200 million institutional letter of credit facility were used for letters of credit at September 30, 2003.
During August 2003, we completed an amendment to our 2003 Credit Facility permitting the proposed Series A Preferred Stock exchange transaction and, in addition, providing increased financial flexibility to the Company over the term of the 2003 Credit Facility. The amendment provided for an additional $250 million of term loan indebtedness and permits the issuance of an additional $750 million of other senior indebtedness in the future. Additionally, the amendment permits us to use the net proceeds of the $250 million additional term loan indebtedness and any successful issuance of other indebtedness of up to $750 million to retire our outstanding senior subordinated indebtedness through optional redemption, public tender offer or open market repurchases.
During the third quarter, we funded a new $250 million Term Loan C (due 2010) under the 2003 Credit Facility and used approximately $168 million of the proceeds to repurchase a portion of our senior subordinated notes. In connection with these repurchases, we paid premiums of approximately $14.7 million. During October 2003, we repurchased $82 million of our senior subordinated notes using the remaining Term Loan C proceeds and paid premiums of approximately $7.6 million related to these repurchases.
The following table provides additional maturity detail of our long-term debt obligations at September 30, 2003 (in millions):
Debt | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
Term Loan B due 2010 |
| 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 1,110.0 | 1,185.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Term Loan C due 2010 |
| 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 234.5 | 250.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables secured loan |
| | | | | 138.9 | | 138.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.375% Senior notes |
| 225.0 | | | | | | 225.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.875% BFI Senior notes |
| | 69.5 | | | | | 69.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.625% Senior notes |
| | | 600.0 | | | | 600.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.875% Senior notes |
| | | | | 600.0 | | 600.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.50% Senior notes |
| | | | | 750.0 | | 750.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.375% BFI Senior notes |
| | | | | 161.2 | | 161.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.875% Senior notes due 2009 |
| | | | | | 875.0 | 875.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.875% Senior notes due 2013 |
| | | | | | 450.0 | 450.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
10.00% Senior sub notes
due 2009 |
20.0 | | | | | | 1,812.3 | 1,832.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.25% Senior notes due 2012 |
| | | | | | 375.0 | 375.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.25% BFI debentures due 2021 |
| | | | | | 99.5 | 99.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.40% BFI debentures due 2035 |
| | | | | | 360.0 | 360.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt |
1.4 | 4.9 | 14.7 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 295.8 | 323.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total principal due |
$ | 21.4 | $ | 248.0 | $ | 102.3 | $ | 623.2 | $ | 18.9 | $ | 1,668.5 | $ | 5,612.1 | $ | 8,294.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Discount, net |
| | (1.0 | ) | | | (14.4 | ) | (74.1 | ) | (89.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt balance |
$ | 21.4 | $ | 248.0 | $ | 101.3 | $ | 623.2 | $ | 18.9 | $ | 1,654.1 | $ | 5,538.0 | $ | 8,204.9 | ||||||||||||||||
45
We have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations, other than financial assurance instruments discussed under Commitments and Contingencies which are not debt. We have no transactions or obligations with related parties that are not disclosed, consolidated into or reflected in our reported results of operations or financial position. We do not guarantee any third-party debt.
Our 2003 Credit Facility and the indentures relating to our senior subordinated notes and our senior notes contain financial covenants and restrictions on our ability to complete acquisitions, pay dividends, incur indebtedness, make investments and take certain other corporate actions.
Under the 2003 Credit Facility, we are subject to the following financial covenants:
Minimum Interest Coverage:
From the | Through the | EBITDA(1)/ | ||||||
Quarter Ending | Quarter Ending | Interest | ||||||
March 31, 2003 |
September 30, 2003 | 1.90x | ||||||
December 31, 2003 |
September 30, 2004 | 2.00x | ||||||
December 31, 2004 |
June 30, 2005 | 2.15x | ||||||
September 30, 2005 |
June 30, 2006 | 2.25x | ||||||
September 30, 2006 |
March 31, 2007 | 2.50x | ||||||
June 30, 2007 |
September 30, 2007 | 2.75x | ||||||
December 31, 2007 |
Thereafter | 3.00x |
Maximum Leverage:
From the | Through the | Total Debt/ | ||||||
Quarter Ending | Quarter Ending | EBITDA (1) | ||||||
March 31, 2003 |
September 30, 2003 | 5.75x | ||||||
December 31, 2003 |
September 30, 2004 | 5.50x | ||||||
December 31, 2004 |
September 30, 2005 | 4.75x | ||||||
December 31, 2005 |
September 30, 2006 | 4.50x | ||||||
December 31, 2006 |
September 30, 2007 | 4.00x | ||||||
December 31, 2007 |
Thereafter | 3.50x |
At September 30, 2003, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under our 2003 Credit Facility. At September 30, 2003, Total Debt/EBITDA(1) ratio, as defined by the 2003 Credit Facility, was 4.86:1 and our EBITDA(1)/Interest ratio was 2.14:1. We are not subject to any minimum net worth covenants.
(1) EBITDA used for covenants is calculated in accordance with the definition in our credit facility agreement (see exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003). In this context, EBITDA is used solely to provide information on the extent to which we are in compliance with debt covenants.
The failure to comply with the financial covenants under our 2003 Credit Facility would constitute default under the credit agreement and would allow the lenders under the 2003 Credit Facility to accelerate the maturity of all indebtedness under the credit agreement. In addition, maturity acceleration on the 2003 Credit Facility constitutes an event of default on the $2 billion senior subordinated notes, 2002 Senior Notes, 2001 Senior Notes and 1998 Senior Notes and, therefore, these would also be subject to acceleration of maturity. If such acceleration of maturities of indebtedness were to occur, we would not have sufficient liquidity available to repay the indebtedness. We would likely have to seek an amendment under the 2003 Credit Facility for relief from the financial covenants or repay the debt with proceeds from the issuance of new debt or equity, and/or assets sales, if necessary. We may be unable to amend the 2003 Credit Facility or raise sufficient capital to repay such obligations in the event the maturities are accelerated.
46
We are required to make prepayments on the 2003 Credit Facility upon completion of certain transactions as defined in the Credit Facility, including asset sales and issuances of debt or equity securities. Proceeds from these transactions are to be applied pursuant to the 2003 Credit Facility. We are also required to make prepayments on the 2003 Credit Facility for 50% of any excess cash flows from operations, as defined. This could result in usage of the 2003 Revolver to accommodate cash timing differences. Factors primarily causing excess cash flow, as defined, could include increases in operating cash flow, lower capital expenditures and working capital requirements, net divestitures or other favorable cash generating activities. Cash flow available to repay debt in excess of the current years maturities will be ratably applied to future maturities.
The 2003 Credit Facility contains certain restrictions, including restrictions on our ability to pay dividends on our common and preferred stock. However, we are able to pay cash dividends on the Series C Preferred Stock and, after July 30, 2004, pay up to $75 million of cash dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock even if our leverage ratio is in excess of 4:1.
On July 31, 2003, we announced that we reached an agreement with the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock to exchange all of their shares for shares of our common stock. The Series A Preferred Stock had a stated value of $1.309 billion at September 30, 2003, which represents the original issuance amount plus cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends. The liquidation preference on the Series A Preferred Stock will continue to increase by the 6.5% cumulative dividend until the completion of the transaction. We have agreed to exchange all of the Series A Preferred Stock outstanding for 110.5 million shares of common stock. If the exchange is approved by our shareholders, no additional common shares will be issued for the increase in liquidation preference for the period of July 31, 2003 through the date the exchange is completed. We expect that our outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis after the exchange is completed will be approximately 350 million shares and that we will eliminate approximately $90 million in dividend payments annually beginning July 2004.
The offer to exchange was approved by a special committee of non-affiliated, independent directors of our Board of Directors and was approved by the full Board of Directors. The Special Committee was advised by Goldman, Sachs and Co. in connection with this transaction. The completion of this transaction is subject to certain approvals, including approval by our shareholders. We are currently in the process of obtaining shareholder approval and anticipate a special meeting of the shareholders on December 18, 2003. We have received lender consent and the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have agreed to vote in favor of the transaction which accounts for approximately 35% of our outstanding shares through direct and beneficial ownership. Under the terms of the exchange agreement, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be restricted from selling the shares of common stock they receive for one year subsequent to the closing. The exchange agreement may be terminated by the holders of the preferred stock or us if the exchange has not been completed by December 31, 2003.
In connection with the exchange, we anticipate a non-cash conversion charge, which will be reflected as a reduction to net income available to common shareholders, but will have no effect on total stockholders equity because offsetting amounts are recorded to additional paid in capital. Due to the change in the original conversion terms, we are required to quantify the accounting effect of the change in conversion terms and reduce net income available to common shareholders by the corresponding amount. The market value of the shares of our common stock issued in excess of the shares of common stock that the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock could have converted into under the original terms of the Series A Preferred Stock will be recorded as a non-cash reduction to net income available to common shareholders on the date all conditions for closing have been met. The exact amount of the non-cash conversion charge will not be known until all conditions for closing have been met; however, we expect the amount to be material.
Based on the original conversion price of $18 and the liquidation preference at September 30, 2003 of approximately $1.309 billion, the number of common shares that the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock could have converted into was 72.7 million shares. Assuming we issue 110.5 million common shares under the exchange agreement, the incremental shares issued would be 37.8 million. Using the closing of our common stock of $10.80 on September 30, 2003, the non-cash reduction to net income available to common shareholders would be approximately $408.3 million. Assuming the same amount of incremental shares issued, if the stock price at the date all conditions for closing have been met is $10.00 or $14.00, the non-cash reduction to net income available to common shareholders would be approximately $378.0 million or $529.3 million, respectively.
Subsequent Events
In October 2003, we announced we were commencing the process of seeking modifications to our 2003 Credit Facility to reduce the interest rates on the term loans and to favorably revise certain financial covenants to provide greater operating flexibility. Such modifications are contingent on the approval of the lenders under our 2003 Credit Facility and there can be no assurance that the lenders will approve the modifications.
In November 2003, we issued $350 million of 6.5% senior notes due 2010 in a private placement under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. We will use the proceeds from the sale of these notes to repurchase $350 million of our senior subordinated notes through open market repurchases or otherwise. We will initiate the registration of these notes with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933 as soon as it is practical.
47
Financing Plan
We are a highly levered company with $8.2 billion of outstanding debt at September 30, 2003. The vast majority of our debt was incurred to acquire solid waste companies during the past 10 years. Our objective to extend maturities under our 1999 Credit Facility was successfully met upon the completion of the financing plan that we launched at the end of March, which included the issuance of equity and debt and the refinancing of our credit facility (together, the Transactions) as follows:
| issuance of 12,048,193 shares of $.01 par value common stock for net proceeds of approximately $94 million; | ||
| issuance of 6.9 million shares of 6.25% 3-year Series C Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock at a par value of $0.10 and issued at $50 per share for net proceeds of approximately $333 million; | ||
| issuance of $450 million of 7.875% senior notes due 2013 for net proceeds of approximately $440 million; | ||
| issuance of approximately $150 million of receivables secured loan under an on-balance sheet accounts receivable securitization program; and | ||
| refinancing of our 1999 Credit Facility consisting of a $1.5 billion revolving credit facility due 2008, with $1.2 billion term loan due 2010 and a $200 million institutional letter of credit facility. In addition, the 2003 Credit Facility allows us to establish an incremental term loan in an amount up to $250 million and an additional institutional letter of credit facility in an amount up to $500 million. |
The refinancing of the 1999 Credit Facility decreased debt maturities for the next 5 years by over $2 billion and increased available liquidity by approximately $400 million. The proceeds from the transactions were used to repay the 1999 Credit Facility.
Our debt maturity schedule after the refinancing of the 1999 Credit Facility reflects annual scheduled payments of $21.4 million, $248.0 million and $102.3 million for the remainder of 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. We are anticipating additional repayments of debt during 2003 with cash flows from operations and our divestiture program. We anticipate completing our divestiture program of net proceeds of $300 million representing approximately $450 million in annual revenues during the fourth quarter 2003 and first quarter 2004.
In the future, we expect to continue to repay debt with cash flow from operations and to fund acquisitions with divestiture proceeds. We may from time to time seek to retire outstanding debt through repurchases and/or exchanges for other securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise.
Commitments and Contingencies
We are required to provide financial assurances to governmental agencies under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for capping, closure and post-closure costs, and performance under certain collection, landfill and transfer station contracts. We satisfy the financial assurance requirements by providing performance bonds, letters of credit, insurance policies or trust deposits. Additionally, we are required to provide financial assurance for our self-insurance program and collateral required for certain performance obligations. During 2003, we expect no material increase in financial assurance obligations although the mix of financial assurance instruments may change.
48
At September 30, 2003, we had the following financial assurance instruments (in thousands):
Landfill | ||||||||||||||||||||
Closure/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Post- | Contract | Risk/Casualty | Collateral for | |||||||||||||||||
Closure | Performance | Insurance | Obligations | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance Policies |
$ | 909,168 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 909,168 | ||||||||||
Surety Bonds |
382,094 | 547,961 | | | 930,055 | |||||||||||||||
Trust Deposits |
73,732 | | | | 73,732 | |||||||||||||||
Letters of Credit (1) |
249,076 | 68,728 | 253,518 | 265,839 | 837,161 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,614,070 | $ | 616,689 | $ | 253,518 | $ | 265,839 | $ | 2,750,116 | ||||||||||
(1) | These amounts are issued under the 2003 Revolver and the institutional letter of credit facility under our 2003 Credit Facility. |
These financial assurance instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not debt of the company. Since we currently have no liability for these financial assurance instruments, they are not reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The underlying obligations of the financial assurance instruments would be valued and recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets if it is probable that we would be unable to perform our obligations under the financial assurance contracts. We do not expect this to occur.
We are currently under examination by various state and federal taxing authorities for certain tax years. A federal income tax audit for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1999 is ongoing. A federal income tax audit for BFIs tax years ended September 30, 1996 through July 30, 1999 is completed with the exception of the matter discussed below.
Prior to our acquisition of BFI on July 30, 1999, BFI operating companies, as part of a risk management initiative to effectively manage and reduce costs associated with certain liabilities, contributed assets and existing environmental and self-insurance liabilities to six fully consolidated BFI risk management companies (RMCs) in exchange for stock representing a minority ownership interest in the RMCs. Subsequently, on July 9, 1999, the BFI operating companies sold that stock in the RMCs to third parties at fair market value which resulted in a capital loss of $900 million for tax purposes, calculated as the excess of the tax basis of the stock over the cash proceeds received. The capital loss was claimed in the BFI tax return for the period from October 1, 1998 to July 30, 1999. The primary argument advanced by the IRS for disallowing the capital loss was that the tax basis of the stock of the RMCs received by the BFI operating companies was required to be reduced by the amount of liabilities assumed even though such liabilities were merely contingent. Under the IRS view, there was no capital loss on the sale of the stock since the tax basis of the stock approximately equaled the proceeds received. On January 18, 2001, the IRS designated this type of transaction and other similar transactions as a potentially abusive tax shelter under IRS regulations.
During 2002, we received notification from the IRS disallowing all of this capital loss. If such disallowance is upheld, we estimate it could have a federal and state income tax effect of up to $310 million plus accrued interest through September 30, 2003 of approximately $50 million. We also received a notification from the IRS assessing a penalty of between 20% and 40% of the additional income tax resulting from the disallowance.
We continue to believe our position is well supported and we will vigorously contest the disallowance. Because of several meritorious defenses, we believe the successful assertion of penalties is remote. The resolution of this matter may entail efforts including administrative appeals and litigation which could extend over several years. An unfavorable result could require future cash expenditures but should have minimal, if any, impact on our consolidated results of operations as the amount of the tax effected disallowance and interest have been fully reserved for on our consolidated balance sheet.
49
We enter into contracts in the normal course of business that include indemnification clauses. Indemnifications relating to known liabilities are recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements based on our best estimate of required future payments. Certain of these indemnifications relate to contingent events or occurrences, such as the imposition of additional taxes due to a change in the tax law or adverse interpretation of the tax law, and indemnifications made in divestiture agreements where we indemnify the buyer for liabilities that may become known in the future but that relate to our activities prior to the divestiture. As of September 30, 2003, we estimate the contingent obligations associated with these indemnifications to be deminimus.
Subtitle D and other regulations that apply to the non-hazardous solid waste disposal industry have required us, as well as others in the industry, to alter operations and to modify or replace pre-Subtitle D landfills. Such expenditures have been and will continue to be substantial. Further regulatory changes could accelerate expenditures for closure and post-closure monitoring and obligate us to spend sums in addition to those presently reserved for such purposes. These factors, together with the other factors discussed above, could substantially increase our operating costs and our ability to invest in our facilities.
New Accounting Standards
For a description of the new accounting standards that affect us, see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Forward-Looking Statements). All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this report, are Forward-Looking Statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such Forward-Looking Statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Generally, these Forward-Looking Statements include, among others, statements regarding:
| our business plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of such plans or strategies; | ||
| the adequacy of our cash flow to make payments on our indebtedness and fund other liquidity needs; | ||
| our ability to continue to achieve price increases under our previously announced pricing initiative; | ||
| our ability to pay cash dividends in the future; | ||
| estimates of future expenses, including amortization expense; | ||
| our ability to increase revenue growth and internal growth by increasing volumes collected and disposed and by increasing the rates for the services we provide; | ||
| our ability to perform our obligations under financial assurance contracts and our ability to maintain the current amount and mix of financial assurance contracts; | ||
| our estimate of federal and state income taxes and penalties required to be paid if we do not prevail in our appeal of the IRS disallowance of capital losses related to BFI; | ||
| our expectation that we will complete the divestiture of several operations during 2003; | ||
| our ability to repay debt with proceeds from our divestitures and operating cash flow; and | ||
| our anticipated benefits in the future from converting the Series A Preferred Stock to common stock. |
50
These Forward-Looking Statements involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially including, without limitation: (1) continuing weakness in the U.S. economy in 2003 may cause a decline in the demand for our services (particularly in the commercial and industrial sectors), a decline in the price of commodities sold by us, increased competitive pressure on pricing and generally make it more difficult for us to predict economic trends; (2) we may be impeded in the successful integration of acquired businesses and its market development efforts, which may cause significant increases in our waste disposal expenses; (3) we may be unsuccessful in achieving greater aggregate revenues from price increases; (4) a change in interest rates or a reduction in the Companys cash flow could impair our ability to service and reduce our debt obligations; (5) volatility in interest rates may, among other things, affect earnings due to possible mark to market changes on certain interest rate hedges; (6) divestitures by us may not raise funds exceeding financing needed for acquisitions in 2003 or may not occur at all; (7) severe weather conditions could impair our operating results; (8) the covenants in our credit facilities and indentures may limit our ability to operate our business; (9) we could be unable to obtain required permits; (10) we may be unable to raise additional capital to meet our operational needs; (11) increases in post-closure costs could result in an increase in our operating costs; (12) we may be unable to obtain financial assurances; (13) the loss of services of any members of senior management may affect our operating abilities; (14) government regulations may increase the cost of doing business; (15) potential liabilities, including the outcome of litigation brought by government agencies, liabilities associated with our acquisitions and hazardous substance and environmental liabilities could increase costs; (16) potential increases in commodity, insurance and fuel prices may make it more expensive to operate our business; (17) we may not be able to obtain all necessary approvals, including shareholder approval, to close the transaction converting our Series A Preferred Stock to our common stock; and (18) potential increases in our operating costs or disruption to our operations as a result of union initiated work stoppages.
Other factors which could materially affect the Forward-Looking Statements in this Form 10-Q can be found in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including risk factors detailed in Managements Discussion and Analysis in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the Forward-Looking Statements and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such Forward-Looking Statements. The Forward-Looking Statements made herein are only made as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
See Note 5 Long-term Debt and Note 6 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Notes 4 and 5 in this Form 10-Q.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, evaluated, summarized and reported accurately within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) rules and forms. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14). Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the date of that evaluation. The conclusions of the CEO and CFO from this evaluation were communicated to the Audit Committee.
51
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 30, 2003, the Solid Waste Commission of Westchester County, New York listed a Notice of Hearing to Suburban Carting Corporation and Metro Enviro LLC alleging violations of county laws and seeking a penalty of $446,000 for the unauthorized acceptance of industrial wastes at two of our subsidiaries transfer stations. These same underlying facts had previously been the subject of an investigation by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation that resulted in the entry of a consent order and payment of a $60,000 fine.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
3.2* | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. as of June 24, 2003. | |
10.1* | Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Thomas W. Ryan effective August 1, 2003. | |
10.2 | Exchange Agreement by and among Allied Waste Industries, Inc., and the Parties Listed on Schedule I dated July 31, 2003. Exhibit 1.01 to Allieds Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 6, 2003 is incorporated by reference. | |
10.3 | Credit Agreement dated as of July 21, 1999, as amended and restated as of April 29, 2003 as further amended and restated as of August 20, 2003. Exhibit 10.01 to Allieds Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 25, 2003 is incorporated by reference. | |
10.4* | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2003, by and among the Company, the Guarantors and the initial purchasers, relating to $350 million aggregate principal amount of 6-1/2% Senior Notes due 2010. | |
10.5* | Eleventh Supplemental Indenture relating to the 6-1/2% Senior Notes due 2010, dated November 10, 2003, among Allied NA, certain guarantors signatory thereto, and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee. | |
31.1* | Section 302 Certifications of Thomas H. Van Weelden, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer | |
31.2* | Section 302 Certifications of Peter S. Hathaway, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
32* | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 of Thomas H. Van Weelden, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and Peter S. Hathaway, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
* Filed herewith
52
(b) Reports on Form 8-K during the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003
July 31, 2003 | Our current report on Form 8-K to announce the financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2003. | |
July 31, 2003 | Our current report on Form 8-K to announce the agreement to exchange the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for Common Stock. | |
August 6, 2003 | Our current report on Form 8-K to file under Item 7 the agreement relating to the exchange of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for Common Stock. | |
August 11, 2003 | Our current report on Form 8-K to file under Item 9 the announcement that Allied will seek an amendment to its existing credit facility. | |
August 25, 2003 | Our current report on Form 8-K to file under Item 7 the amended and restated credit facility agreement and under Item 9 the announcement that Allied had (1) completed the amendment to its credit facility; (2) funded a new $250 million Term Loan C under its credit facility and (3) the completion of the sale of its New Jersey assets to Waste Management, Inc. | |
August 29, 2003 | Our current report on Form 8-K to file under Item 7 revised and updated historical information previously filed in our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K to primarily reclassify the reported results of discontinued operations from continuing operations. |
53
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. | ||||
By: | /s/ PETER S. HATHAWAY | |||
Peter S. Hathaway | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
By: | /s/ JAMES E. GRAY | |||
James E. Gray | ||||
Vice President, Controller and | ||||
Chief Accounting Officer |
Date: November 10, 2003
54
Index to Exhibits
3.2* | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. as of June 24, 2003. | |
10.1* | Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Thomas W. Ryan effective August 1, 2003. | |
10.2 | Exchange Agreement by and among Allied Waste Industries, Inc., and the Parties Listed on Schedule I dated July 31, 2003. Exhibit 1.01 to Allieds Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 6, 2003 is incorporated by reference. | |
10.3 | Credit Agreement dated as of July 21, 1999, as amended and restated as of April 29, 2003 as further amended and restated as of August 20, 2003. Exhibit 10.01 to Allieds Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 25, 2003 is incorporated by reference. | |
10.4* | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2003, by and among the Company, the Guarantors and the initial purchasers, relating to $350 million aggregate principal amount of 6-1/2% Senior Notes due 2010. | |
10.5* | Eleventh Supplemental Indenture relating to the 6-1/2% Senior Notes due 2010, dated November 10, 2003, among Allied NA, certain guarantors signatory thereto, and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee. | |
31.1* | Section 302 Certifications of Thomas H. Van Weelden, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer | |
31.2* | Section 302 Certifications of Peter S. Hathaway, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |
32* | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 of Thomas H. Van Weelden, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and Peter S. Hathaway, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
* Filed herewith