Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2003

OR

For the transition period from ________________ to ________________

Commission File Number: 0-11412

AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 480-967-5146

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [   ] No

Shares of Common Stock outstanding as of August 3, 2003: 2,695,321

Table of Contents

AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

2

Table of Contents

AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Amtech Systems, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Tempress Systems, Inc., based in Heerde, The Netherlands, and P. R. Hoffman Machine Products, Inc. (collectively, the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and consequently do not include all the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented have been made. Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002.

The consolidated results of operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

     2.     STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:

The Company has five stock-based employee compensation plans, which are summarized in the table below. Amtech accounts for these plans using the intrinsic value method and in accordance with the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issues to Employees” and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Company’s stock-based employee compensation plans are as follows:

6

Table of Contents

Qualified stock options issued under the terms of the plans have or will have an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market value of the common stock at the date of the option grant and expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant, with the most recent grant expiring in 2013. Options issued in fiscal years 2003, 2002 and 2001 vest at the rate of 20% — 33% per year. As of June 30, 2003 and 2002, the Company had 201,833 and 261,008 stock options, respectively, available for grant under the plans.

The stock option transactions and the options outstanding are summarized as follows:

No adjustment has been made for the non-transferability of the options or for the risk of forfeiture at the time of issuance. Forfeitures are instead recorded as incurred. The fair value of each option grant has been estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” to stock-based employee compensation:

7

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2003:

3. DEFERRED PROFIT

     The components of deferred profit are as follows:

8

Table of Contents

4. INVENTORIES

The components of inventories are as follows:

5. CONCENTRATIONS OF RISK

As of June 30, 2003, accounts receivable from two customers exceeded 10% of the total accounts receivable. The receivable from Customer A represented 30% and the receivable from Customer B represented 16%, respectively, of the total accounts receivable as of June 30, 2003. Both of these accounts were collected in full subsequent to that date. In addition, approximately 64% of the work-in-process inventory is attributable to a single customer. That customer’s orders are scheduled to ship in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2003.

6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

7. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

9

Table of Contents

For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, 434,484; 434,484; 234,700 and 69,700 shares, respectively, were excluded from the earnings (loss) per share calculation. These options are not classified as common equivalents in the above table as they are either antidilutive due to the net loss for the period or their exercise price exceeds the average market price for the period.

8. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company classifies its products into two business segments, semiconductor equipment and polishing supplies. The semiconductor equipment segment designs, manufactures and markets semiconductor wafer processing and handling equipment used in the fabrication of integrated circuits. Also aggregated in the semiconductor equipment segment are the manufacturing support service business and any difference between the planned corporate expenses, which are allocated to the segments based upon their revenue and the Company’s investment in each, and actual corporate expenses. The polishing supplies segment designs, manufactures and markets carriers, templates and equipment used in the lapping and polishing of wafer thin materials, including silicon wafers used in the production of semiconductors. Information concerning the Company’s business segments is as follows:

9. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On or about August 31, 2000, a “P.R. Hoffman Machine Products” was one of eleven companies named in a legal action brought by North Middleton Township in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, the owner of a landfill allegedly found to be contaminated. No detailed allegations have been filed as part of

10

Table of Contents

this legal action, which appears to have been filed to preserve the right to file claims for contribution to the clean-up of the landfill at a later date. The Company acquired the assets of P.R. Hoffman Machine Products, Inc. in an asset transaction consummated on July 1, 1997. The landfill was closed and has not been used by P.R. Hoffman since sometime prior to completion of the Company’s asset acquisition. Therefore, the Company believes that the named company is the prior owner of the acquired assets. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement governing the acquisition, the prior owner, P.R. Hoffman Machine Products Corporation, is obligated to indemnify the Company for any breaches of its representations and warranties in the Asset Purchase Agreement, including representations relating to environmental matters. In accordance with the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company has provided notice to the prior owner of P.R. Hoffman Machine Products Corporation of the Company’s intent to seek indemnification from such owner for any liabilities resulting from this legal action. Based on information available to the Company as of the date of this report, management believes the costs, if any, to resolve this matter will not be material to the Company’s business, results of operations or financial position.

10. USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

11. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

On October 1, 2002, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Under this accounting standard, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization but are tested for impairment at least annually. SFAS No. 142 also requires the completion of the transitional impairment test of the recorded goodwill as of the date this accounting standard is adopted. The Company completed the first step of the transitional impairment test during the quarter ended March 31, 2003, noting no indication of impairment associated with the recorded goodwill balance of $728,000 as of October 1, 2002.

For comparative purposes, pro forma net income (loss) assuming SFAS No. 142 had been adopted in fiscal 2002 is as follows:

In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on issue 00-21, “Multiple – Deliverable Revenue Arrangements” (EITF 00-21). EITF 00-21 addresses how to account for arrangements

11

Table of Contents

that may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The consensus mandates how to identify whether goods or services or both which are to be delivered separately in a bundled sales arrangement should be accounted for separately because they are “separate units of accounting.” The guidance can affect the timing of revenue recognition for such arrangements, even though it does not change rules governing the timing or patterns of revenue recognition of individual items accounted for separately. The final consensus will be applicable to agreements entered into in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2003 with early adoption permitted. Additionally, companies will be permitted to apply the consensus guidance to all existing arrangements as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in accordance with APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes.” Amtech does not believe the adoption of EITF 00-21 will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

     In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51.” This Interpretation addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities as defined in the Interpretation. The Interpretation applies immediately to variable interests in variable interest entities obtained after January 31, 2003. For public enterprises with a variable interest in a variable interest entity created before February 1, 2003, the Interpretation is applied to the enterprise no later than the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Interpretation requires certain disclosures in financial statements issued after January 31, 2003 if it is reasonably possible that a Company will consolidate or disclose information about variable interest entities when the Interpretation becomes effective. Amtech believes it currently has no contractual relationship or other business relationship with a variable interest entity and therefore the adoption of this interpretation is not expected to have a material effect on Amtech’s financial position or operating results.

12

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

     Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is forward-looking in nature. All statements included or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or made by management of Amtech Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Amtech”), other than statements of historical fact, are hereby identified as “forward-looking statements” (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding Amtech’s future financial results, operating results, business strategies, projected costs, products under development, competitive positions and plans and objectives of management for future operations. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “possible,” “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Any expectations based on these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and other important factors, including those discussed in the section entitled “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Trends, Risks and Uncertainties” in Amtech’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference. These and many other factors could affect Amtech’s future operating results and financial condition, and could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations based on forward-looking statements made in this document or elsewhere by Amtech or on its behalf. All references to “we,” “our,” “us,” or “Amtech” refer to Amtech Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Documents To Review In Connection With Management’s Analysis Of Financial Condition and Results Of Operations

     This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes presented in this Form 10-Q and the Financial Statements and Notes and the section entitled “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis — Trends, Risks and Uncertainties” in our last filed Annual Report on Form 10- K for a more complete understanding of our financial position and results of operations for the three and nine month period ended June 30, 2003.

Results of Operations

     Amtech develops, manufactures, markets and services a range of semiconductor wafer manufacturing and semiconductor fabrication equipment and related parts, supplies and services on a worldwide basis. The products offered are grouped into two segments: the semiconductor equipment segment which offers horizontal diffusion furnaces, processing/robotic equipment for diffusion furnaces and services to semiconductor manufacturers; and the polishing supplies segment, which offers supplies, including carriers and templates, and equipment for lapping and polishing, some of the last steps in the manufacture of silicon wafers. Demand for Amtech’s products can change significantly from period to period as a result of numerous factors, including, but not limited to, changes in: 1) global and regional economic conditions; 2) supply

13

Table of Contents

and demand for semiconductors or, more specifically, capacity utilization and production volume of manufacturers of semiconductors, silicon wafers, solar cells and microelectrical mechanical systems (MEMS), including optical components; and 3) the profitability and capital resources of potential customers in these industries. For this and other reasons, Amtech’s results of operations for past periods may not necessarily be indicative of future operating results.

     Amtech’s orders tend to be more volatile than its revenue as any change in demand is reflected immediately in the orders booked, which are net of order cancellations, while revenues tend to be recognized over multiple quarters as a result of procurement and production lead times and the deferral of certain revenue under the Company’s accounting policy for revenue recognition.

     During the third quarter of fiscal 2000 Amtech’s orders reached a historical high. Beginning in the first fiscal quarter of 2001, slowing worldwide demand for semiconductors resulted in a rapid decline in net demand for manufacturing equipment. Inventory buildups in telecommunications products, slower than expected personal computer sales and slow global economic growth for electronic products caused many semiconductor manufacturers to reevaluate their capital spending plans and reduce the placement of new orders, while rescheduling or canceling existing orders. This decline in demand continued throughout fiscal 2001 and the first half of fiscal 2002, due to continued weakness in the macro-economic climate. Amtech believes its order backlog reached the lowest point of the economic cycle during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2002.

     During the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2002, the semiconductor industry recovered modestly and semiconductor wafer manufacturers continued spending on equipment for producing 300mm wafers, resulting in increased orders, shipments and backlog as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2002. New orders, shipments, revenue and backlog were volatile during this period and are shown in the table below (in thousands):