UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
OR
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number: 0-27876
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
86-0787377 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
14400 North 87th Street
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260
(480) 308-3000
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) had been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes x No o
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants Common Stock, $0.01 par value, was 28,502,750 as of May 9, 2003.
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No. | ||||||||||||
PART I: INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||||||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
|||||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 |
3 | |||||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002 |
4 | |||||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three Months
Ended March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002 |
5 | |||||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2003 and March 31, 2002 |
6 | |||||||||||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
8 | |||||||||||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
14 | ||||||||||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
36 | ||||||||||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
37 | ||||||||||
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||||||||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
38 | ||||||||||
Item 2. | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
38 | ||||||||||
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
38 | ||||||||||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
38 | ||||||||||
Item 5. | Other Information |
38 | ||||||||||
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
38 | ||||||||||
Signature | 39 | |||||||||||
Certifications | 40 |
2
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 68,940 | $ | 71,065 | ||||||||
Marketable securities |
36,808 | 30,790 | ||||||||||
Total cash and marketable securities |
105,748 | 101,855 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
36,984 | 47,077 | ||||||||||
Income tax receivable |
8,270 | 7,479 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax asset |
5,166 | 5,564 | ||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
14,728 | 12,289 | ||||||||||
Total current assets |
170,896 | 174,264 | ||||||||||
Property and Equipment, net |
21,778 | 21,337 | ||||||||||
Goodwill |
59,801 | 59,801 | ||||||||||
Other Intangibles, net |
54,854 | 56,635 | ||||||||||
Promissory Note Receivable |
2,976 | 3,017 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 310,305 | $ | 315,054 | ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 3,581 | $ | 3,020 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
17,846 | 26,957 | ||||||||||
Deferred revenue |
29,773 | 23,331 | ||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
51,200 | 53,308 | ||||||||||
Deferred Tax Liability |
4,180 | 4,980 | ||||||||||
Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; none
issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized, 50,000,000 shares;
issued
28,917,045 and 28,696,688 shares, respectively |
289 | 287 | ||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
239,433 | 237,120 | ||||||||||
Retained earnings |
25,115 | 27,353 | ||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(5,360 | ) | (4,199 | ) | ||||||||
259,477 | 260,561 | |||||||||||
Less treasury stock, at cost, 414,702 and 339,702 shares,
respectively |
(4,552 | ) | (3,795 | ) | ||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
254,925 | 256,766 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 310,305 | $ | 315,054 | ||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except earnings per share data)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||||
Software licenses |
$ | 7,703 | $ | 19,533 | ||||||
Maintenance services |
16,444 | 13,016 | ||||||||
Product revenues |
24,147 | 32,549 | ||||||||
Consulting services |
15,601 | 24,571 | ||||||||
Reimbursed expenses |
1,507 | 2,030 | ||||||||
Service revenues |
17,108 | 26,601 | ||||||||
Total revenues |
41,255 | 59,150 | ||||||||
COST OF REVENUES: |
||||||||||
Cost of software licenses |
241 | 411 | ||||||||
Amortization of acquired software technology |
1,069 | 1,037 | ||||||||
Cost of maintenance services |
3,916 | 3,398 | ||||||||
Cost of product revenues |
5,226 | 4,846 | ||||||||
Cost of consulting services |
14,060 | 17,830 | ||||||||
Reimbursed expenses |
1,507 | 2,030 | ||||||||
Cost of service revenues |
15,567 | 19,860 | ||||||||
Total cost of revenues |
20,793 | 24,706 | ||||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
20,462 | 34,444 | ||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||||
Product development |
10,180 | 10,401 | ||||||||
Sales and marketing |
7,567 | 9,390 | ||||||||
General and administrative |
5,309 | 7,477 | ||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
712 | 714 | ||||||||
Relocation costs to consolidate development and
client support activities |
682 | | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
24,450 | 27,982 | ||||||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) |
(3,988 | ) | 6,462 | |||||||
Other income, net |
545 | 581 | ||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
(3,443 | ) | 7,043 | |||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(1,205 | ) | 2,498 | |||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (2,238 | ) | $ | 4,545 | |||||
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE |
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .17 | |||||
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE |
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .16 | |||||
SHARES USED TO COMPUTE: |
||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
28,452 | 27,383 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
28,452 | 28,983 | ||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE OPERATIONS
(in thousands, unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (2,238 | ) | $ | 4,545 | ||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |
|||||||||
Unrealized holding loss on marketable securities
available for sale, net of tax |
(22 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency translation loss |
(1,139 | ) | (301 | ) | |||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (3,399 | ) | $ | 4,232 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, unaudited)
Three Months | |||||||||||
Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (2,238 | ) | $ | 4,545 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,082 | 3,797 | |||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
250 | 1,000 | |||||||||
Tax benefit stock options and employee stock purchase plan |
9 | 4,905 | |||||||||
Net (gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment |
(9 | ) | 23 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(402 | ) | 96 | ||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
9,350 | (2,764 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax receivable |
(831 | ) | (3,723 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(2,561 | ) | (3,177 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable |
533 | 706 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
(9,240 | ) | (3,638 | ) | |||||||
Deferred revenue |
6,120 | 2,957 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
5,063 | 4,727 | |||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|||||||||||
Purchase of marketable securities |
(14,456 | ) | (5,454 | ) | |||||||
Maturities of marketable securities |
8,416 | | |||||||||
Payment of direct costs related to the acquisition of E3 Corporation |
(228 | ) | (2,688 | ) | |||||||
Payments received on promissory note receivable |
41 | 157 | |||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(2,888 | ) | (1,432 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
109 | 65 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(9,006 | ) | (9,352 | ) | |||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|||||||||||
Issuance of common stock stock option plan |
134 | 9,764 | |||||||||
Issuance of common stock employee stock purchase plan |
2,172 | 2,039 | |||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(757 | ) | (22 | ) | |||||||
Payments on capital lease obligations |
(59 | ) | (101 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
1,490 | 11,680 | |||||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
328 | (102 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(2,125 | ) | 6,953 | ||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
71,065 | 51,865 | |||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 68,940 | $ | 58,818 | |||||||
6
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands, unaudited)
Three Months | ||||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||||
Cash paid for: |
||||||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 757 | $ | 1,364 | ||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except percentages, shares, per share amounts, or as otherwise stated)
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of JDA Software Group, Inc. (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to interim financial statements. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and reclassifications considered necessary for a fair and comparable presentation have been included and are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the March 31, 2002 interim financial statements in order to conform to the March 31, 2003 presentation.
2. New Accounting Standards
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No. 146). The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS No. 146 was adopted effective January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF No. 94-3. Under SFAS No. 146, the liability for costs associated with exit or disposal activities is recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred, rather than at the date the Company committed to the exit plan. No exit or disposal activities have occurred since the adoption of SFAS No. 146.
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148) which is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of transition to SFAS No. 123s fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation if a company elects to account for its equity awards under this method. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure of the effects of an entitys accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in both annual and interim financial statements. We are currently evaluating which method of transition to fair value accounting we will elect.
The following table presents pro forma disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 of net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if stock-based employee compensation had been recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, as determined under the fair value method using the Black-Scholes pricing model.
8
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Net income (loss) as
reported |
$ | (2,238 | ) | $ | 4,545 | |||
Less: stock-based compensation
expense, net of
related tax
effects |
(1,918 | ) | (2,686 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income
(loss) |
$ | (4,156 | ) | $ | 1,859 | |||
Basic earnings (loss) per share
as reported |
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .17 | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
as reported |
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .16 | |||
Basic earnings (loss) per share
pro forma |
$ | (.15 | ) | $ | .07 | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
pro forma |
$ | (.15 | ) | $ | .06 |
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors Accountings and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others, which clarifies the requirement of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, relating to a guarantors accounting for and disclosures of certain guarantee issues. We do not provide direct or indirect guarantees of the indebtedness of others.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. Variable interest entities are defined as entities with a level of invested equity that is not sufficient to fund future activities to permit it to operate on a stand alone basis. We do not participate in variable interest entities.
3. Subsequent Event Acquisition of Vista Software Solutions
On April 30, 2003 we acquired substantially all the intellectual property of Vista Software Solutions (Vista), and Vistas active customer agreements for $4.3 million in cash. We expect to incur additional direct costs and costs to exit the activities of Vista of $300,000 to $800,000. Vista is a provider of collaborative business-to-business software solutions that enable retailers and consumer goods manufacturers to more efficiently synchronize and integrate data, including product descriptions, product images, pricing and promotion information throughout their supply and demand chains. Vistas solutions also enable consumer goods manufacturers to manage trade promotions, minimize trade deductions costs and more accurately forecast product demand. With this acquisition, we have expanded the JDA Portfolio with complementary software products that leverage the Microsoft .NET platform and address the critical need for server-to-server data synchronization in Internet-based collaborative commerce. The acquisition will be accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, the operating results of Vista will be included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Pro forma operating results will not be presented as the acquisition is not material to our consolidated financial statements.
4. Earnings per Share
Earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 is calculated as follows:
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (2,238 | ) | $ | 4,545 | |||
Shares Basic earnings (loss) per share |
28,452 | 27,383 | ||||||
Dilutive common stock equivalents |
| 1,600 | ||||||
Shares Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
28,452 | 28,983 | ||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .17 | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .16 | |||
No common stock equivalents were included in the calculation of diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as such common stock equivalents would be anti-dilutive.
9
5. Restructuring, Asset Disposition and Other Merger Related Charges
In second quarter 2002 we recorded a $1.3 million restructuring charge for a workforce reduction of 53 full-time employees, primarily in the consulting services function in the Americas and Europe. All workforce reductions associated with this charge were made on or before June 30, 2002. All employees potentially impacted by this restructuring were notified of the plan of termination and the related benefits on or before June 30, 2002.
In fourth quarter 2002, we recorded a restructuring charge of $5.0 million for the workforce reduction and office closure costs to reorganize the Company in connection with the implementation of the Customer Value Program (CVP), a worldwide initiative designed to (i) refocus the organization on delivering value to our existing customer base, (ii) strengthen our competitive position, (iii) improve the quality, satisfaction and efficiency of our customers experience with JDA, and (iv) increase revenue and improve our operating results.
Implementation of the CVP includes adjustments to our workforce and a reallocation of our resources in response to a fundamental shift in the way we develop product and bring it to market, as well as to changes in the demand for the various types of products we sell, the length of implementation efforts required and associated skill requirements. The workforce reductions enabled us to better align our cost structure during the current economic downturn, which has adversely impacted our revenues, elongated our selling cycles, and delayed, suspended or reduced the demand for certain of our products. The reorganization will result in the consolidation of nearly all product development and client support activities at our corporate headquarters, a workforce reduction of approximately 230 full-time employees (FTE) and certain office closures. The workforce reduction includes certain employees involved in product development (73 FTE) and client support services (28 FTE) who choose not to relocate, and reductions in consulting services personnel (66 FTE), sales and marketing personnel (37 FTE), and administrative functions (26 FTE). We have hired or expect to hire approximately 35 FTE in product development and client support services to replace those individuals who choose not to relocate to our corporate headquarters. All employees potentially impacted by this reorganization were notified of the plan of termination and the related benefits on or before December 31, 2002. Office closure costs pertain to certain US, Latin American, and European offices that were either under-performing or became redundant with the reorganization. We expect to reduce our annual fixed operating costs by approximately $10 million to $12 million through this reorganization and restructuring effort
Approximately 150 people were offered the opportunity to relocate as part of the initiative to consolidate our development and client support activities. As of March 31, 2003, a total of 31 employees have relocated and we currently anticipate that an additional 25 to 30 employees will relocate in the next three to six months. We have negotiated temporary retention arrangements ranging from nine months to two years with certain employees who have chosen not to relocate in order to facilitate a smooth transition. We have incurred $1.1 million in relocation costs through March 31, 2003, including $682,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2003, and expect to incur an additional $900,000 to $1.1 million in relocation costs during the next six months to complete this consolidation. The relocation costs will be reported in income from continuing operations as they are incurred. Accordingly, there was no accrued liability associated with these charges at March 31, 2003 or December 31, 2002.
A summary of the 2002 restructuring and asset disposition charges is as follows:
Initial | Cash | Loss on disposal | Balance at | Cash | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||||
Description of the charge | Reserve | Charges | of assets | Dec 31, 2002 | Charges | March 31,2003 | |||||||||||||||||||
Severance and termination
benefits |
$ | 5,204 | $ | (2,635 | ) | $ | | $ | 2,569 | $ | (1,214 | ) | $ | 1,355 | |||||||||||
Office closure costs |
1,083 | (28 | ) | (47 | ) | 1,008 | (104 | ) | 904 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,287 | $ | (2,663 | ) | $ | (47 | ) | $ | 3,577 | $ | (1,318 | ) | $ | 2,259 | ||||||||||
The unpaid balance of severance and termination benefits pertains primarily to termination agreements with foreign employees that are either being disputed or are required to be paid out over a period of time under local law. We expect these amounts to be paid out during the remainder of 2003. The remaining amounts in the reserve for office closure costs are being paid out as the leases and related subleases run through their remaining terms.
10
6. Stock Repurchase Program
In July 2002, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to two million shares of our outstanding common stock. Under this repurchase program, we may periodically repurchase common shares on the open market at prevailing market prices during a one-year period ending July 22, 2003. As of March 31, 2003, we have repurchased a total of 175,000 shares of our common stock for $1.8 million under this program, including 75,000 shares that were purchased during the three months ended March 31, 2003 for $757,000.
7. E3 Acquisition Reserves
In conjunction with the acquisition of E3 Corporation (E3) in September 2001, we recorded initial acquisition reserves of approximately $14.6 million for restructuring charges and other direct costs associated with the acquisition. These costs related primarily to facility closures, employee severance, investment banker fees, and legal and accounting costs. We subsequently increased the purchase price and the E3 acquisition reserves by $1.3 million during 2002 based on our revised estimates of the restructuring costs to exit the activities of E3 and the other direct costs of the acquisition. The unused portion of the acquisition reserves, which are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the balance sheet, was $1.2 million at December 31, 2002 and $987,000 at March 31, 2003. A summary of the charges and adjustments recorded against the reserves are as follows:
Balance at | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Initial | Cash | Adjustments | December 31, | Cash | Non-Cash | March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Description of charge | Reserve | Charges | to Reserve | 2002 | Charges | Charges | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges under EITF 95-3: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility termination and sublease
costs |
$ | 4,689 | $ | (5,040 | ) | $ | 1,129 | $ | 778 | $ | (118 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 635 | ||||||||||||
Employee severance and termination
benefits |
4,351 | (4,115 | ) | 184 | 420 | (68 | ) | 352 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Termination payments to distributors |
500 | (100 | ) | (400 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
E3 user group and trade show
cancellation fees |
84 | (72 | ) | (12 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Direct costs under SFAS 141: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal and accounting costs |
2,344 | (2,709 | ) | 407 | 42 | (42 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investment banker fees |
2,119 | (2,119 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Due diligence fees and expenses |
350 | (376 | ) | 26 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Filing fees, appraisal services and
transfer taxes |
110 | (100 | ) | (10 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 14,547 | $ | (14,631 | ) | $ | 1,324 | $ | 1,240 | $ | (228 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 987 | ||||||||||||
The facility termination and sublease costs are costs of a plan to exit an activity of an acquired company as described in Financial Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 95-3 (EITF No. 95-3), Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination, and include the estimated costs of managements plan to shut down nine offices of E3 shortly after the acquisition date. These costs have no future economic benefit to the Company and are incremental to the other costs incurred by the Company or E3. Immediately following the consummation of the E3 acquisition, the Company engaged real estate advisers and began the necessary activities to shut down the offices and sublet the locations or negotiate early termination agreements with the various landlords. The most significant E3 facility (the former Corporate Headquarters) was difficult to sublet and in July 2002 we settled with the landlord by paying a $3.4 million lease termination fee. This resulted in a $950,000 adjustment to the facility termination and sublease costs acquisition reserve. The remaining amounts in this reserve are being paid out as the leases and any related subleases run through their remaining terms.
Employee severance and termination benefits are costs resulting from a plan to involuntarily terminate employees from an acquired company as described in EITF No. 95-3. As of the consummation date of the
11
acquisition, executive management approved a plan to involuntarily terminate approximately 31% of the 338 full time employees of E3. In the first three months following the consummation of the E3 acquisition, management completed the assessment of which employees would be involuntarily terminated and communicated the termination arrangements to the affected employees in accordance with statutory requirements of the local jurisdictions in which the employees were located. We expect all amounts for these exit costs to be paid out before June 30, 2003.
8. Business Segments and Geographic Data
We are a leading provider of sophisticated software solutions designed specifically to address the demand and supply chain management, business process, decision support, e-commerce, inventory optimization and collaborative planning and forecasting requirements of the retail industry and its suppliers. Our solutions enable our customers to collect, manage, organize and analyze information throughout their retail enterprise, and to collaborate with suppliers and customers over the Internet at multiple levels within their organizations. We conduct business in three geographic regions that have separate management teams and reporting structures: the Americas (includes the United States, Canada and Latin America), Europe (includes the Middle East and Africa), and Asia/Pacific. Similar products and services are offered in each geographic region and local management is evaluated primarily based on total revenues and operating income. Identifiable assets are also managed by geographical region. The geographic distribution of our revenues and identifiable assets is as follows:
Three Months | ||||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 25,306 | $ | 41,267 | ||||||
Europe |
12,201 | 13,806 | ||||||||
Asia/Pacific |
5,257 | 4,646 | ||||||||
42,764 | 59,719 | |||||||||
Sales and transfers among regions |
(1,509 | ) | (569 | ) | ||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 41,255 | $ | 59,150 | ||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
Identifiable assets: |
||||||||||
Americas |
253,516 | 260,502 | ||||||||
Europe |
45,868 | 43,446 | ||||||||
Asia/Pacific |
10,921 | 11,106 | ||||||||
Total identifiable assets |
$ | 310,305 | $ | 315,054 | ||||||
We have organized our business segments around the distinct requirements of retail enterprises, retail stores, and suppliers to the retail industry:
| Retail Enterprise Systems include corporate level merchandise management systems that enable retailers to optimize their inventory control, product mix, pricing and promotional strategies, automate demand forecasting and replenishment, and enhance the productivity and accuracy of warehouse processes. In addition, Retail Enterprise Systems include a comprehensive set of tools for analyzing business results and trends, tracking customer shopping patterns, space management, trade allowance and promotional program management, and for monitoring strategic plans and tactical decisions. | |
| In-Store Systems include point-of-sale, e-commerce and back office applications that enable retailers to capture, analyze and transmit certain sales, store inventory and other operational information to corporate level merchandise management systems using hand-held, radio frequency devices, point-of-sale workstations or via the Internet. | |
| Collaborative Solutions include applications that enable business-to-business collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment between retailers and their suppliers. Collaborative Solutions, which currently include portions of Retail Enterprise Systems applications that can be used by suppliers as well as collaboration specific solutions, enable retailers and their suppliers to optimize the sharing of plans, information and supply chain |
12
decisions between trading partners in such areas as inventory replenishment, marketing/promotions, sales planning/execution and category management. |
A summary of the revenues, operating income (loss), and depreciation attributable to each of these business segments for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:
Three Months | |||||||||
Ended March 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Revenues: |
|||||||||
Retail Enterprise Systems |
$ | 27,769 | $ | 41,615 | |||||
In-Store Systems |
2,945 | 6,746 | |||||||
Collaborative Solutions |
10,541 | 10,789 | |||||||
$ | 41,255 | $ | 59,150 | ||||||
Operating income (loss): |
|||||||||
Retail Enterprise Systems |
$ | 1,693 | $ | 9,735 | |||||
In-Store Systems |
(407 | ) | 1,776 | ||||||
Collaborative Solutions |
1,429 | 3,142 | |||||||
Other (see below) |
(6,703 | ) | (8,191 | ) | |||||
$ | (3,988 | ) | $ | 6,462 | |||||
Depreciation: |
|||||||||
Retail Enterprise
systems |
$ | 1,607 | $ | 1,573 | |||||
In-Store
systems |
236 | 267 | |||||||
Collaborative
Solutions |
458 | 206 | |||||||
$ | 2,301 | $ | 2,046 | ||||||
Other: |
|||||||||
Amortization of intangible
assets |
$ | 712 | $ | 714 | |||||
Relocation costs to consolidate
development and support
activities |
682 | | |||||||
General and administrative expenses |
5,309 | 7,477 | |||||||
$ | 6,703 | $ | 8,191 | ||||||
Operating income in the Retail Enterprise Systems, In-Store Systems and Collaborative Solutions business segments includes direct expenses for software licenses, maintenance services, consulting services, sales and marketing expenses, product development expenses, as well as allocations for occupancy costs and depreciation expense. The Other caption includes general and administrative expenses and other charges that are not directly identified with a particular business segment and which management does not consider in evaluating the operating income of the business segment.
13
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements reflecting managements current forecast of certain aspects of our future. It is based on current information that we have assessed but which by its nature is dynamic and subject to rapid and even abrupt changes. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding future operating results, liquidity, capital expenditures, product development and enhancements, numbers of personnel, strategic relationships with third parties, acquisitions and strategy. The forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as plan, estimate, expect, intend, believe, should, would, could, anticipate or other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes. In particular, we provide our belief that delays in the decision-making process of our customers may continue to be the most significant issue affecting our software license revenue results, our belief that certain of the conditions that impacted our results in first quarter 2003, including the timing of the outbreak of the US war with Iraq, should not have the same impact on our results in second quarter 2003, our expectation that software license revenue results will improve in second quarter 2003 compared to first quarter 2003, our belief that the Customer Value Program (CVP) may continue to adversely affect our operating results during the next three to six months, our belief that consulting services revenue and service margins will not significantly improve until the demand for Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems and the related implementation services return or until economic conditions improve, our concern that the impact of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome may adversely effect our revenues in Asia/Pacific in second quarter 2003 and potentially in future quarters, our expectation of relocating an additional 25 to 30 employees in connection with CVP over the next three to six months at a cost ranging from $900,000 to $1.1 million, our belief that the reorganization of the Company in connection with the CVP will result in a $10 million to $12 million reduction in our operating costs and allow us to achieve acceptable levels of profitability during this difficult economic period, our belief that sales activity with larger retail customers with annual sales in excess of $5 billion will continue to contribute to revenue in future periods, our belief that the series of enhancements being developed for the JDA Portfolio products on the Microsoft .NET platform will provide us a competitive advantage in the retail and collaborative solutions markets, our belief that quarterly product development expenditures for the remainder of 2003 will be consistent with first quarter 2003 levels, our belief that the pending audits of our 2000 and 2001 Federal Income Tax Returns will not result in any material adjustments, and our belief that our cash and cash equivalent, investments in marketable securities, and funds generated from operations will provide adequate liquidity to meet our normal operating requirements for at least the next twelve months. Our actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied by our forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with our business. These risks are described throughout this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which you should read carefully. We would particularly refer you to the section under the heading Factors That May Affect Our Future Results or The Market Price of Our Stock for an extended discussion of the risks confronting our business. The forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be considered in the context of these risk factors.
Overview
We are a leading provider of sophisticated software solutions designed specifically to address the demand and supply chain management, business process, decision support, e-commerce, inventory optimization, and collaborative planning and forecasting requirements of the retail industry and its suppliers. Our solutions enable our customers to collect, manage, organize and analyze information throughout their retail enterprise, and to collaborate with suppliers and customers over the Internet at multiple levels within their organization. We also offer maintenance services to our software customers, and enhance and support our software business by offering retail specific services that are designed to enable our clients to rapidly achieve the benefits of our solutions. These services include project management, system planning, system design and implementation, custom configurations, and training services. Demand for our implementation services is driven by, and often trails, sales of our software products. Consulting services revenues are generally more predictable but generate lower gross margins than software license revenues.
Significant Trends and Developments in Our Business
Economic Conditions Continue to Impact our Operating Results. Our operating results continue to be impacted by weak economic conditions and the disappointing results of the retail industry. In addition, we believe our operating results have been negatively impacted by the disruption from the early phases of implementation of the
14
Customer Value Program (see The Reorganization of the Company and the Implementation of the Customer Value Program have Impacted our Operating Results), the timing of the outbreak of the US war with Iraq during the last two weeks of first quarter 2003, and the economic uncertainty related to the threat of future terrorist attacks and wars. The impact of these factors was consistent across substantially all of our product lines as well as nearly all of our geographic regions during the three months ended March 31, 2003. We also believe the retail industry has increased its due diligence on large capital outlays and that the decision-making process for investments in information technology has been highly susceptible to deferrals in the current economic environment. For example, no large software licenses ($1.0 million or greater) were signed during first quarter 2003, as compared to four in fourth quarter 2002 and three in first quarter 2002. Delays in the decision-making process have been, and may continue to be, the most significant issue affecting our software license revenue results. Our sales pipeline remains large, and we believe that certain of the factors that impacted our results in first quarter 2003, including the economy, the implementation of the Customer Value Program, and the timing of the outbreak of the US war with Iraq, should not have the same impact on our results in second quarter 2003. We currently anticipate that our software license revenue results will improve in second quarter 2003 compared to first quarter 2003.
The retail industry will be adversely impacted if negative economic conditions or fear of additional wars or terrorists attacks persist for an extended period of time. Weak and uncertain economic conditions have in the past, and may in the future, negatively impact our revenues, elongate our selling cycles, and delay, suspend or reduce the demand for our products. As a result, it is difficult in the current economic environment to predict exactly when specific software licenses will close within a six to nine month time frame. In addition, we believe that pricing pressure has increased in response to the economic downturn, which could cause us to offer more significant discounts, or in some cases to lose potential business to competitors willing to offer what we believe to be overly aggressive discounts. Further, weak and uncertain economic conditions could cause a deterioration of our customers creditworthiness in the future and impair our customers ability to pay for our products or services or cause an increase in bankruptcy filings in our customer base. Any of these factors could adversely impact our business, quarterly or annual operating results and financial condition.
The Reorganization of the Company and the Implementation of the Customer Value Program have Impacted our Operating Results. We announced the reorganization of the Company in fourth quarter 2002 in connection with the announcement of the Customer Value Program (CVP), a worldwide initiative designed to (i) refocus the organization on delivering value to our existing customer base, (ii) strengthen our competitive position, (iii) improve the quality, satisfaction and efficiency of our customers experience with JDA, and (iv) increase revenue and improve our operating results. Implementation of the CVP includes adjustments to our workforce, and a reallocation of our resources in response to a fundamental shift in the way we develop product and bring it to market, as well as to changes in the demand for the various types of products we sell, the length of implementation efforts required and associated skill requirements. The workforce reductions enabled us to better align our cost structure during the current economic downturn, which has adversely impacted our revenues, elongated our selling cycles, and delayed, suspended or reduced the demand for certain of our products.
As anticipated, our decision to reorganize the Company and implement the CVP has caused initial disruptions in our sales, services and training functions that negatively impacted our revenues and operating results in first quarter 2003. Although we believe the most significant negative impact of the CVP implementation is now behind us, the costs and risks associated with the widespread changes contemplated in the CVP may continue to adversely affect our operating results during the next three to six months.
The CVP has resulted in the following fundamental changes to our organizational structure:
| Consolidation of our operations into three geographic regions: The Americas (United States, Canada, and Latin America); Europe (Europe, Middle East and Africa); and Asia/Pacific. | ||
| Implementation of a Customer Engagement Model that provides a single point of contact for our customers for all aspects of our business (software sales, services and support). This role is designed to foster long-term strategic partnerships with our customer base. | ||
| Combination of our sales and services personnel into a single Customer Solutions Group. This new organization is intended to ensure a smooth transition from the sales cycle to implementation and |
15
allow for broader product coverage. | |||
| Elimination of certain management positions, and the introduction of a professional career structure for all associates within the Customer Solutions Group. | ||
| Increased focus and investment in associate education in order to develop a higher degree of expertise in our associates, and to enhance the long-term value to our customers. | ||
| Consolidation of nearly all product development and client support activities at our corporate headquarters. | ||
| A workforce reduction of approximately 230 full-time employees (FTE) and certain office closures. The workforce reduction includes certain employees involved in product development (73 FTE) and client support services (28 FTE) who choose not to relocate, and reductions in consulting services personnel (66 FTE), sales and marketing personnel (37 FTE), and administrative functions (26 FTE). We have hired or expect to hire approximately 35 FTE in product development and client support services to replace those individuals who choose not to relocate to our corporate headquarters. | ||
| Closure of certain US, Latin American, and European offices that were either under-performing or became redundant with the reorganization. |
We expect to reduce our annual fixed operating costs by approximately $10 million to $12 million through this reorganization and restructuring effort. We believe this effort has been effective, and will allow us to achieve acceptable levels of profitability during this difficult economic period. Cost of services and operating expenses, excluding the $5.0 million restructuring charge taken in fourth quarter 2002 in connection with this initiative and the relocation costs to consolidate our development and client support activities, decreased $2.0 million and $3.5 million, respectively from fourth quarter 2002 to first quarter 2003 due primarily to the workforce reductions and reduced incentive compensation.
Approximately 150 people were offered the opportunity to relocate as part of the initiative to consolidate our development and client support activities. As of March 31, 2003, a total of 31 employees have relocated and we currently anticipate that an additional 25 to 30 employees will relocate in the next three to six months. We have negotiated temporary retention arrangements ranging from nine months to two years with certain employees who have chosen not to relocate in order to facilitate a smooth transition. We have incurred $1.1 million in relocation costs through March 31, 2003, including $682,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2003, and expect to incur an additional $900,000 to $1.1 million in relocation costs during the next six months to complete this consolidation. The relocation costs will be reported in income from continuing operations as they are incurred. Accordingly, there was no accrued liability associated with these charges at March 31, 2003 or December 31, 2002.
Our Service Revenues Continue to Decline. Service revenues decreased 36% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002, primarily due to a decrease in demand for the implementation of Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems and other large projects. We believe retailers have changed their buying behavior since the September 11 attack, and as a result of the ensuing deterioration in economic conditions, causing a fundamental shift in the mix of demand for the various types of products we sell from high dollar projects to lower cost point solutions. Consulting services revenue typically lags the sale of software licenses by as much as one year. We also believe the average implementation times for our software products have declined due to increased training and expertise in our consulting organization, and as a direct result of the investments we have made over the past few years to increase the functionality, stability, scalability, integration and ease of implementation of the products in the JDA Portfolio. Furthermore, most of our product demand in 2002 and during the three months ended March 31, 2003 was associated with our Strategic Merchandise Management Solutions that require lower levels of services to implement. As a result of these changes in our business and product revenue mix, our service revenues have declined sequentially in each of the last five quarters and we do not expect service revenues or service margins to significantly improve until the demand for Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems and the related implementation services returns, and economic conditions improve.
16
Service revenue margins were 9% in the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to 25% in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Despite significant headcount reductions in 2002 to counteract the decline in demand for services, our gross utilization rate decreased to 38% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 52% in the three months ended March 31, 2002, the effect of which was offset in part by lower incentive compensation payments and higher average billing rates. The lower utilization rates in three months ended March 31, 2003 resulted from the disruption caused by the early phases of implementation of the CVP, which required significant training time for the affected service employees, as well as the deteriorating economic conditions that have decreased the overall demand for our services the demand for Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems and other high dollar projects, and the improved integration and reduced implementation timeframes for products in the JDA Portfolio.
We Continue to Invest in New Product Development and Have Expanded Our Markets. We invested $10.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003. In addition, we invested approximately $292 million from 1998 to 2002 in new product development and the acquisition of complimentary products while remaining profitable and cash flow positive from operations. We released enhanced versions of our core software products during the past two years and introduced new value-added web-based applications such as Store Portal, Affinity and Marketing Expense Management. In addition, the acquisitions of Intactix, Zapotec, NeoVista Decision Series and E3 expanded our product offerings, and provided us with collaborative applications that address new vertical market opportunities with the manufacturers and wholesalers who supply our traditional retail customers. The Collaborative Solutions business segment, which includes sales of software license and services to customers outside the retail market, provided 26% of our total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 18% in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Our collaborative specific solutions enable retailers and their suppliers to optimize the sharing of plans, information and supply chain decisions between trading partners in such areas of inventory replenishment, marketing/promotions, sales planning/execution and category management. As of March 31, 2003, there are nearly 150 trading partners worldwide that are live and operational on our Marketplace Replenishment application that enables manufacturers, distributors and retailers to work from a single, shared demand forecast. Although no large software licenses ($1.0 million or greater) were signed during the three months ended March 31, 2003, we have experienced increased sales activity in the last two years from larger retail customers with annual sales in excess of $5 billion that we expect will continue to contribute to our revenue in future periods. We believe our strategy of expanding our product portfolio and increasing the scalability of our products has been the key element in attracting larger retail customers, and we believe that it has resulted in a steady pattern of new customers licensing multiple products, as well as enhanced back-selling opportunities in our install base.
We are developing a series of enhancements to the JDA Portfolio products, based upon the Microsoft .Net technology platform (.Net Platform), that we believe will position us uniquely in the retail and collaborative solutions markets. Our goals are to ensure that our solutions offer: (i) increased ease of use, (ii) increased integration of business processes, (iii) reduced cost of ownership, (iv) faster implementation, and (v) faster return on investment. We believe our next generation technology will enhance our competitive position since we will be able to offer significant features and functionality using an advanced technology platform. Our goal is to eliminate lower value services associated with the implementation of our products, and as a result, we may experience a reduction in the revenue associated with certain of our consulting services offerings. We believe that this reduced revenue will be more than offset by increased software and maintenance revenues, and increased revenue from strategic consulting and education services. The first step in the execution of this strategy began in June 2002 with the delivery of JDA Portfolio 2003 the first ever fully synchronized, integrated release of all of our products.
Our Financial Position is Strong and We Have Operating Cash Flow. We continue to maintain a strong financial position during the current difficult economic cycle with $105.7 million in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, and no debt. In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2003 we generated $5.1 million in positive cash flow from operations.
We Have Acquired Vista Software Solutions. On April 30, 2003 we acquired substantially all the intellectual property of Vista Software Solutions (Vista), and Vistas active customer agreements for $4.3 million in cash. We expect to incur additional direct costs and costs to exit the activities of Vista of $300,000 to $800,000. Vista is a provider of collaborative business-to-business software solutions that enable retailers and consumer goods manufacturers to more efficiently synchronize and integrate data, including product descriptions, product images, pricing and promotion information throughout their supply and demand chains. Vistas solutions also enable
17
consumer goods manufacturers to manage trade promotions, minimize trade deductions costs and more accurately forecast product demand. With this acquisition, we have expanded the JDA Portfolio with complementary software products that leverage the Microsoft .NET platform and address the critical need for server-to-server data synchronization in Internet-based collaborative commerce. The acquisition will be accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, the operating results of Vista will be included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Pro forma operating results will not be presented as the acquisition is not material to our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on our business operations is discussed throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results. The preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those estimates.
| Revenue recognition. Our revenue recognition policy is significant because our revenue is a key component of our results of operations. In addition, our revenue recognition determines the timing of certain expenses such as commissions and royalties. We follow specific and detailed guidelines in measuring revenue; however, certain judgments affect the application of our revenue policy. | ||
We license software under non-cancelable agreements and provide related services, including consulting, training and customer support. We recognize revenue in accordance with Statement of Position 97-2 (SOP 97-2), Software Revenue Recognition, as amended and interpreted by Statement of Position 98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, with respect to certain transactions, as well as Technical Practice Aids issued from time to time by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. We adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, during first quarter 2000. SAB 101 provides further interpretive guidance for public companies on the recognition, presentation, and disclosure of revenue in financial statements. The adoption of SAB 101 did not have a material impact on our licensing or revenue recognition practices. | |||
Software license revenue is recognized when a license agreement has been signed, the software product has been delivered, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, the fees are fixed and determinable, and collection is considered probable. If a software license contains an undelivered element, the vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value of the undelivered element is deferred and the revenue recognized once the element is delivered. The undelivered elements are primarily training, consulting and maintenance services. VSOE of fair value for training and consulting services is based upon standard hourly rates charged when those services are sold separately. VSOE of fair value for maintenance is the price the customer will be required to pay when it is sold separately (that is, the renewal rate). In addition, if a software license contains customer acceptance criteria or a cancellation right, the software revenue is recognized upon the earlier of customer acceptance or the expiration of the acceptance period or cancellation right. Payments for our software licenses are typically due in installments within twelve months from the date of delivery. Although infrequent, where software license agreements call for payment terms of twelve months or more from the date of delivery, revenue is recognized as payments become due and all other conditions for revenue recognition have been satisfied. | |||
Consulting and training services are separately priced, are generally available from a number of suppliers, and are not essential to the functionality of our software products. Consulting services, which include project management, system planning, design and implementation, customer configurations, and training are billed on both an hourly basis and under fixed price contracts. Consulting services revenue billed on an hourly basis is recognized as the work is performed. Training revenues are recognized when the training is provided and is included in consulting revenues in the Companys consolidated statements of income. Under fixed price contracts, consulting services revenue is recognized using the percentage of completion |
18
method of accounting by relating hours incurred to date to total estimated hours at completion. | |||
We have from time to time provided software and consulting services under fixed price contracts that require the achievement of certain milestones and payment terms in these contracts are generally tied to customer acceptance of the milestones. The revenue under such arrangements is recognized as the milestones are achieved or upon customer acceptance. We believe that milestones are a proper measure of progress under these contracts, as the milestones approximate the percentage of completion method of accounting. | |||
Customer support services include post contract support and the rights to unspecified upgrades and enhancements. Maintenance revenues from ongoing customer support services are billed on a monthly basis and recorded as revenue in the applicable month, or on an annual basis with the revenue being deferred and recognized ratably over the maintenance period. | |||
If an arrangement includes multiple elements, the fees are allocated to the various elements based upon VSOE of fair value, as described above. | |||
| Accounts Receivable. Consistent with industry practice and to be competitive in the retail software marketplace, we typically provide installment payment terms on most software license sales. Software licenses are generally due in installments within twelve months from the date of delivery. All significant customers are reviewed for creditworthiness before the Company licenses its software and we do not sell our software or recognize any license revenue unless we believe that collection is probable in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 8 in SOP 97-2. We have a history of collecting software payments when they come due without providing refunds or concessions. Consulting services are billed bi-weekly and maintenance services are billed annually or monthly. If a customer becomes significantly delinquent or its credit deteriorates, we put the accounts on hold and do not recognize any further services revenue (and in most cases we withdraw support and/or our implementation staff) until the situation has been resolved. | ||
We do not have significant billing or collection problems. Although infrequent and unpredictable, from time to time certain of our customers have filed bankruptcy and we have been required to refund the pre-petition amounts collected and settle for less than the face value of its remaining receivable pursuant to a bankruptcy court order. In these situations, as soon as it becomes probable that the net realizable value of the receivable is impaired, we provide reserves on the receivable. In addition, we monitor economic conditions in the various geographic regions in which it operates to determine if general reserves or adjustments to its credit policy in a region are appropriate for deteriorating conditions that may impact the net realizable value of our receivables. | |||
| Intangible Assets. Our business combinations typically result in goodwill and other intangible assets, which affects the amount of future period amortization expense and possible impairment expense that we will incur. The determination of the value of such intangible assets and the annual impairment tests require management to make estimates of future revenues, customer retention rates and other assumptions that affect our consolidated financial statements. | ||
| Income Taxes. Our income tax policy records the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets, as well as operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. We follow specific and detailed guidelines regarding the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheet and provide any necessary allowances as required. | ||
| Stock-Based Compensation. We do not record compensation expense for options granted to our employees as all options granted under our stock option plans have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. As permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123), we have elected to continue to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and provide pro forma disclosure on a quarterly and annual basis of net income (loss) and net income (loss) per common share for employee stock option grants made as if the fair-value method |
19
defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (SFAS No. 146). The provisions of SFAS No. 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. SFAS No. 146 was adopted effective January 1, 2003. SFAS No. 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF No. 94-3. Under SFAS No. 146, the liability for costs associated with exit or disposal activities is recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred, rather than at the date the Company committed to the exit plan. No exist or disposal activities have occurred since the adoption of SFAS No. 146.
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148) which is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of transition to SFAS No. 123s fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation if a company elects to account for its equity awards under this method. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure of the effects of an entitys accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in both annual and interim financial statements. We are currently evaluating which method of transition to fair value accounting we will elect.
The following table presents pro forma disclosures required by SFAS No. 148 of net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if compensation expense had been recognized for stock options granted in the three year period ended December 31, 2002, as determined under the fair value method using the Black-Scholes pricing model, and includes the effect of shares issued under the employee stock purchase plan.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Net income (loss) as reported |
$ | (2,238 | ) | $ | 4,545 | |||
Less: stock-based compensation expense, net of
related tax effects |
(1,918 | ) | (2,686 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
$ | (4,156 | ) | $ | 1,859 | |||
Basic earnings (loss) per share as reported |
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .17 | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share as reported |
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .16 | |||
Basic earnings (loss) per share pro forma |
$ | (.15 | ) | $ | .07 | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share pro forma |
$ | (.15 | ) | $ | .06 |
In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors Accountings and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of the Indebtedness of Others, which clarifies the requirement of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, relating to a guarantors accounting for and disclosures of certain guarantee issues. We do not provide direct or indirect guarantees of the indebtedness of others.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. Variable interest entities are defined as entities with a level of invested equity that is not sufficient to fund future activities to permit it to operate on a stand alone basis. We do not participate in variable interest entities.
Three months ended March 31, 2003 Compared to Three months ended March 31, 2002
Revenues consist of product revenues and services revenue, which represented 59% and 41%, respectively, of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 55% and 45%, respectively in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003 were $41.3 million, a decrease of $17.8 million, or 30%, from the $59.1 million reported in the months ended March 31, 2002.
20
Product Revenues
Software Licenses. Software license revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003 decreased 61% to $7.7 million from $19.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Software license sales continue to be impacted by weak economic conditions and the disappointing results of the retail industry. In addition, we believe software license sales have been negatively impacted by the disruption from the early phases of implementation of the CVP, the timing of the outbreak of the US war with Iraq during the last two weeks of first quarter 2003, and the economic uncertainty related to the threat of future terrorist attacks and wars. The impact of these factors was consistent across substantially all of our product lines as well as nearly all of our geographic regions during three months ended March 31, 2003.
We also believe the retail industry has increased its due diligence on large capital outlays and that the decision-making process for investments in information technology has been highly susceptible to deferrals in the current economic environment. For example, no large software deals ($1.0 million or greater) were signed during first quarter 2003, as compared to four in fourth quarter 2002 and three in first quarter 2002. Delays in the decision-making process have been and may continue to be the most significant issue affecting our software license revenue results. Our sales pipeline remains large, and we believe that certain of the factors that impacted our results in first quarter 2003, including the economy, the implementation of the CVP, and the timing of the outbreak of the US war with Iraq, should not have the same impact on our results in second quarter 2003. We currently anticipate that our software license revenue results will improve in second quarter 2003 compared to first quarter 2003. We also believe retailers have changed their buying behavior since the September 11 attack and as a result of the ensuing deterioration in economic conditions, causing a fundamental shift in the mix of demand for the various types of products we sell from high dollar projects to lower cost point solutions. Software license revenues in the Retail Enterprise Systems business segment decreased 67% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002. In-Store Systems software license revenues decreased 85% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002. Collaborative Solutions software license revenues decreased 37% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Software license revenues in the Americas decreased 67% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002 due to decreases in software license revenues related to Retail Enterprise Systems, In-Store Systems, and Collaborative Solutions applications of 72%, 86%, and 44%, respectively. Software license revenues in Europe decreased 68% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002 due to decreases in software license revenues related to Retail Enterprise Systems, In-Store Systems, and Collaborative Solutions applications of 91%, 69%, and 19%, respectively. Software license revenues in Asia/Pacific increased 56% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002 due to an increase in software license revenues related to Retail Enterprise Systems applications of 118%, offset in part by decreases in software license revenues related to In-Store Systems and Collaborative Solutions products of 100%, and 54%, respectively
Maintenance Services. Maintenance services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2003 increased 26% to $16.4 million from $13.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002 due primarily to increases in the install base for all of our product lines.
Service Revenues
Service revenues, which include consulting services and reimbursed expenses, decreased 36% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 to $17.1 million from $26.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, primarily due to a decrease in demand for the implementation of Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems and other large projects. Service revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 were also negatively impacted by the disruption from the early phases of implementation of the CVP, which required significant training time for the affected service employees. We believe retailers have changed their buying behavior since the September 11 attack and as a result of the ensuing deterioration in economic conditions, causing a fundamental shift in the mix of demand for the various types of products we sell from high dollar projects to lower cost point solutions. Consulting services revenue typically lags the sale of software licenses by as much as one year. We also believe the average
21
implementation times for our software products have declined due to increased training and expertise in our consulting organization, and as a direct result of the investments we have made over the past few years to increase the functionality, stability, scalability, integration and ease of implementation of the products in the JDA Portfolio. Furthermore, most of the demand for our products in 2002 and during the three months ended March 31, 2003 was associated with our Strategic Merchandise Management Solutions that require lower levels of services to implement. As a result of these changes in our business and product revenue mix, our service revenues have declined sequentially in each of the last five quarters and we do not expect service revenues or service margins to significantly improve until the demand for Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems and the related implementation services returns, and economic conditions improve.
Business Segment Revenues
Total revenues in our Retail Enterprise Systems business segment decreased 33% to $27.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $41.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, due to decreases in demand across nearly all product lines. Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems in particular tend to be more heavily impacted during slow economic periods, as retailers are often reluctant to make substantial investments due to the slower expected return on investment. In addition, these products typically have longer implementation time frames and our services group often performs the implementation services. As a result, the decline in software sales for these products is also having a negative impact on our consulting services revenue. The Retail Enterprise Systems business segment represented 67% of our total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 70% in the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Total revenues in our In-Store Systems business segment decreased 56% to $2.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $6.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. In-Store Systems such as Win/DSS tend to be heavily impacted during slower economic periods, as the implementation of a new point-of-sale system usually requires a substantial hardware investment. The In-Store Systems business segment represented 7% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 11% in the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Total revenues in our Collaborative Solutions business segment decreased 2% to $10.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $10.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, due to decreases in demand across nearly all product lines except Portfolio Space Management revenues from non-retail customers. The Collaborative Solutions business segment represented 26% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 18% in the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Geographic Revenues
Total revenues in the Americas (includes the United States, Canada and Latin America) decreased 39% to $25.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $41.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002 due to a 67% decrease in software license revenues and a 45% decrease in service revenues, offset in part by a 19% increase in maintenance services revenue.
Total revenues in Europe decreased 12% to $12.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $13.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002 due to a 68% decrease in software license revenues offset in part by a 44% increase in maintenance services revenue. Service revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003 were flat with the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Total revenues in Asia/Pacific increased 13% to $5.3 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $4.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002 due to a 56% increase in software license revenues and a 31% increase in maintenance services revenue, offset in part by a 7% decrease in service revenues. We are concerned that the impact of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) may adversely effect our revenues in Asia/Pacific in second quarter 2003 and potentially in future quarters.
22
Cost of Product Revenues
Cost of Software Licenses. Cost of software licenses was $241,000, or 3% of software license revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $411,000, or 2% of software license revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in cost of software licenses dollars results from the lower volume of software products sold in the three months ended March 31, 2003 that incorporate functionality from third party software providers and require the payment of royalties.
Amortization of Acquired Software Technology. Amortization of acquired software technology was $1.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $1.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase results from the amortization of software technology acquired from JCommerce in April 2002.
Cost of Maintenance Services. Cost of maintenance services increased 15% to $3.9 million, or 24% of maintenance services revenue, in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $3.4 million, or 26% of maintenance services revenue, in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The increase results from the additional headcount in the customer support function to support our growing installed client base, offset in part by lower incentive compensation costs. At March 31, 2003, we had 144 employees in the customer support function.
Cost of Service Revenues
Cost of service revenues decreased 22% to $15.6 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $19.9 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. This decrease results primarily from a 24% decrease in consulting services headcount and lower incentive compensation costs in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002, offset in part by higher travel and training costs. At March 31, 2003, we had 440 employees in the consulting services function.
Gross Profit
Gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2003 decreased 41% to $20.5 million, or 50% of total revenues, from $34.4 million, or 58% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in gross profit dollars and gross margin percentage results primarily from decreases in software license revenues and service revenues of 61% and 36%, respectively, offset in part by a 26% increase in maintenance services revenue. Software licenses and maintenance services revenue have substantially higher margins than service revenues. Service revenue margins were 9% in the three months ended March 31, 2003, compared to 25% in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Despite significant headcount reductions in 2002 to counteract the decline in demand for services, our gross utilization rate decreased to 38% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 52% in the three months ended March 31, 2002, the effect of which was offset in part by lower incentive compensation payments and higher average billing rates. The lower utilization rates in three months ended March 31, 2003 result from the disruption caused by the early phases of implementation of the CVP which required significant training time for the affected service employees, as well as the deteriorating economic conditions that have decreased the overall demand for our services, the demand for Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems and other high dollar projects, and the improved integration and reduced implementation timeframes for products in the JDA Portfolio. We do not expect service revenues or service margins to significantly improve until the demand for Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems and the related implementation services returns, and economic conditions improve.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, excluding amortization of intangibles and relocation costs to consolidate development and support activities decreased 15% to $23.1 million, or 56% of total revenues, in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $27.3 million, or 46% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Overall, our cost structure was lower in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002 due to decreases in sales and marketing and administrative headcount that resulted from the reorganization of the Company in fourth quarter 2002 in connection with the implementation of the CVP, lower incentive compensation costs, and a $750,000 lower bad debt expense.
23
Product Development. Product development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2003 decreased 2% to $10.2 million from $10.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Product development expense as a percentage of product revenues was 42% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 32% in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Product development expense increased during the three months ended March 31, 2003 with the addition of full-time employees involved in the ongoing development of a series of enhancements to the JDA Portfolio products based upon the Microsoft .Net technology platform, the development of Portfolio POS, and the development of further collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) applications, offset in part by lower incentive compensation costs. We also believe development of our software is essentially completed concurrent with the establishment of technological feasibility, and accordingly, no costs have been capitalized. At March 31, 2003, we had 355 employees in the product development function. We expect to spend $41.0 million to $43.0 million in product development for the year ending December 31, 2003.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2003 decreased 19% to $7.6 million from $9.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Sales and marketing expense as a percentage of total revenues was 18% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to 16% in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in sales and marketing expenses results primarily from a 20% decrease in sales and marketing FTE, together with lower commissions and marketing costs. At March 31, 2003, we had 145 employees in the sales and marketing function including 71 direct sales representatives, 55 individuals in pre-sales positions, and 19 associates involved in the marketing function.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2003 decreased 29% to $5.3 million from $7.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. General and administrative expense, as a percentage of total revenues, was 13% in the three months ended March 31, 2003 which is comparable to the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in general and administrative expenses results primarily from a 15% decrease in administrative headcount, lower incentive compensation costs, a $750,000 lower bad debt expense, and a $413,000 favorable foreign currency exchange variance. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2002 included a $635,000 arbitration settlement charge, and the three months ended March 31, 2003 included a $398,000 credit for the favorable settlement of a mediated claim.
Amortization of Intangibles. Amortization of intangibles was $712,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $714,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2002.
Relocation Costs to Consolidate Development and Client Support Activities. We have incurred various costs to relocate and consolidate certain product development and client support services employees based in offices around the United States and the United Kingdom to our corporate headquarters in Scottsdale, Arizona. Approximately 150 people were offered the opportunity to relocate as this initiative. As of March 31, 2003, a total of 31 employees have relocated and we currently anticipate that an additional 25 to 30 employees will relocate in the next three to six months. We have negotiated temporary retention arrangements ranging from nine months to two years with certain employees who have chosen not to relocate in order to facilitate a smooth transition. We have incurred $1.1 million in relocation costs through March 31, 2003, including $682,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2003, and expect to incur an additional $900,000 to $1.1 million in relocation costs during the next two quarters to complete this consolidation. The relocation costs will be reported in income from continuing operations as they are incurred.
Operating Income
We incurred an operating loss of $4.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to operating income of $6.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease in operating income results from decreases in software licenses and service revenues of 61% and 36%, respectively in the three months ended March 31, 2002 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002, offset in part by a 26% increase in maintenance services revenues, a 21% decrease in cost of services excluding reimbursed expenses, and a 15% decrease in operating expenses, excluding amortization of intangibles and relocation costs to consolidate development and support activities.
24
Operating income in our Retail Enterprise Systems business segment decreased 83% to $1.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $9.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease results from lower total software and services revenues in this business segment in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002, offset in part by higher maintenance services revenue and decreases in sales and marketing costs and cost of consulting services due to reduced headcounts and lower incentive compensation.
We incurred an operating loss of $407,000 in our In-Store Systems business segment in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to operating income of $1.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease results from lower product and services revenues in this business segment in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002, offset in part by a decrease in cost of consulting services due to reduced headcounts and lower incentive compensation.
Operating income in our Collaborative Solutions business segment decreased 55% to $1.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $3.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The decrease results primarily from increases in sales and marketing and product development headcount to support our new CPFR initiatives and future growth of this business segment.
Provision for Income Taxes
We recorded a tax benefit of $1.2 million, or 35% of the reported loss before income taxes in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to a provision for income taxes of $2.5 million, or 35.5% of income before income taxes in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The tax benefit includes a United States benefit of $2.3 million, offset in part by income tax expense in our foreign subsidiaries of $1.1 million. The effective income tax rate for 2003 of 35% takes into account the source of taxable income, domestically by state and internationally by country, and available income tax credits. No research and development tax credit has been claimed due to the loss incurred in the three months ended March 31, 2003.
We have reached a tentative settlement with the Internal Revenue Service on their examination of our 1998 and 1999 federal income tax returns. Under this tentative settlement, the Internal Revenue Service has agreed to allow the Company to take a research and development expense tax credit for most of the qualifying expenses originally reported in the 1998 and 1999 federal income tax returns. However, the Internal Revenue Service has advised that they cannot release a final report on these years or issue a refund check until they complete a subsequent audit of our 2000 and 2001 federal income tax returns. This audit is expected to take six to nine months and no material adjustments are anticipated.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We had working capital of $119.7 million at March 31, 2003 compared with $121.0 million at December 31, 2002. Cash and marketable securities at March 31, 2003 were $105.7 million, an increase of $3.8 million over the $101.9 million reported at December 31, 2001. Working capital decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2003 primarily as a result of a decrease in accounts receivable balances, offset in part by a reduction in accrued expenses and other liabilities. Cash and marketable securities balances increased in the three months ended March 31, 2003 primarily as a result of cash provided by operating activities and the cash received from the issuance of common stock under our stock option and employee stock purchase plans.
Operating activities provided cash of $5.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 and $4.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The $400,000 increase in cash provided from operating activities in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2002 results primarily from $3.2 million higher deferred revenue, a $2.9 decrease in income tax receivable, and a $9.4 million decrease in accounts receivable in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to a $2.8 million increase in accounts receivable in the three months ended March 31, 2002. These sources of operating cash were partially offset by a $2.2 million net loss in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to net income of $4.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002, a $4.9 million decrease in the income tax benefits from the exercise of stock options and shares purchased under the employee stock purchase plan, a $5.6 million decrease in accrued expenses and other current liabilities, and $750,000 lower provision for doubtful accounts. Our net receivables were $37.0 million, or
25
81 days sales outstanding (DSOs) at March 31, 2003 compared to $47.1 million, or 79 DSOs at December 31, 2002, and $62.9 million, or 96 DSOs at March 31, 2002. Collection of receivables continues to be an area of focus during these tentative economic times. DSOs may fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis due to a number of factors including seasonality, shifts in customer buying patterns, lengthened contractual payment terms in response to competitive pressures, the underlying mix of products and services, and the geographic concentration of revenues.
Investing activities utilized cash of $9.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 and $9.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. Cash utilized by investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2003 results primarily from the net purchase of $6.0 million of marketable securities and $2.9 million in capital expenditures. Cash utilized by investing activities in the three months ended March 31, 2002 includes the purchases of $5.5 million of marketable securities, the payment of $2.7 million in direct costs related to the acquisition of E3, and 1.4 million in capital expenditures.
Financing activities provided cash of $1.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 and $11.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. The activity in both periods includes proceeds from the issuance of common stock under our stock option and employee stock purchase plans. In addition, the activity for the three months ended March 31, 2003 includes the repurchase of 75,000 shares of our outstanding stock for $757,000.
Changes in the currency exchange rates of our foreign operations had the effect of increasing cash by $328,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2003 and reducing cash by $102,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2002. We currently have no derivative instruments and have not engaged in any material foreign currency hedging transactions.
We believe there are opportunities to grow our business through the acquisition of complementary and synergistic companies, products and technologies. We look for acquisitions that can be readily integrated and accretive to earnings, although we may pursue smaller non-accretive acquisitions that will shorten our time to market with new technologies. We believe the general size of cash acquisitions we would currently consider to be in the $5 million to $30 million range. Any material acquisition could result in a decrease to our working capital depending on the amount, timing and nature of the consideration to be paid. In addition, any material acquisitions of complementary or synergistic companies, products or technologies could require that we obtain additional equity financing. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available or that, if available, such financing will be obtained on terms favorable to us and would not result in additional dilution to our stockholders.
On April 30, 2003 we acquired substantially all the intellectual property of Vista Software Solutions (Vista), and Vistas active customer agreements for $4.3 million in cash. We expect to incur additional direct costs and costs to exit the activities of Vista of $300,000 to $800,000. Vista is a provider of collaborative business-to-business software solutions that enable retailers and consumer goods manufacturers to more efficiently synchronize and integrate data, including product descriptions, product images, pricing and promotion information throughout their supply and demand chains. Vistas solutions also enable consumer goods manufacturers to manage trade promotions, minimize trade deductions costs and more accurately forecast product demand. With this acquisition, we have expanded the JDA Portfolio with complementary software products that leverage the Microsoft .NET platform and address the critical need for server-to-server data synchronization in Internet-based collaborative commerce. The acquisition will be accounted for as a purchase, and accordingly, the operating results of Vista will be included in our consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Pro forma operating results will not be presented as the acquisition is not material to our consolidated financial statements.
In July 2002, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to two million shares of our outstanding common stock. Under this repurchase program, we may periodically repurchase common shares on the open market at prevailing market prices during a one-year period ending July 22, 2003. As of March 31, 2003, we have repurchased a total of 175,000 shares of our common stock for $1.8 million under this program.
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities, and funds generated from operations will provide adequate liquidity to meet our normal operating requirements for at least the next twelve months.
26
Factors That May Affect Our Future Results or The Market Price of Our Stock
We operate in a dynamic and rapidly changing environment that involves numerous risks and uncertainties. The following section describes some, but not all, of these risks and uncertainties that we believe may adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. This section should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of March 31, 2003 and for the three months then ended contained elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
Regional And/Or Global Changes in Economic, Political And Market Conditions Could Cause Decreases in Demand For Our Software And Related Services Which Could Negatively Affect Our Revenue And Operating Results And The Market Price of Our Stock.
Our revenue and profitability depend on the overall demand for our software and related services. A regional and/or global change in the economy and financial markets could result in delay or cancellation of customer purchases. We and most of our competitors recently announced that current economic conditions have negatively impacted financial results. In addition, recent developments associated with terrorist attacks on United States interests, the war with Iraq, and the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) have resulted in economic, political and other uncertainties, which could further adversely affect our revenue growth and operating results. If demand for our software and related services decrease, our revenues would decrease and our operating results would be adversely affected. Our inability to license software products to new customers may cause our stock price to fall.
Our Quarterly Operating Results May Fluctuate Significantly, Which Could Adversely Affect the Price of Our Stock.
Our quarterly operating results have varied and are expected to continue to vary in the future. If our quarterly operating results fail to meet managements projections or analysts expectations, the price of our stock could decline. Many factors may cause these fluctuations, including:
| Demand for our software products and services, including the size and timing of individual contracts and our ability to recognize revenue with respect to contracts signed in the quarter, particularly with respect to our significant customers; | ||
| Changes in the length of our sales cycle; | ||
| Competitive pricing pressures; | ||
| Customer order deferrals resulting from the anticipation of new products, economic uncertainty, disappointing operating results by the customer, or otherwise; | ||
| The timing of new software product and technology introductions and enhancements to our software products or those of our competitors, and market acceptance of our new software products and technology; | ||
| Changes in our operating expenses; | ||
| Changes in the mix of domestic and international revenues, or expansion or contraction of international operations; | ||
| Our ability to complete fixed price consulting contracts within budget; | ||
| Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; | ||
| Operational issues resulting from corporate reorganizations (see We May Encounter Difficulties Successfully Implementing Our Recent Corporate Reorganization); and |
27
| Lower-than-anticipated utilization in our consulting services group as a result of reduced levels of software sales, reduced implementation times for our products, changes in the mix of demand for our software products, or other reasons. |
Our Stock Price Has Been And May Remain Volatile.
The trading price of our common stock has in the past and may in the future be subject to wide fluctuations. Examples of factors that we believe have caused fluctuations in our stock price in the recent past include the following:
| Cancelled or delayed purchasing decisions related to the September 11 terrorist attack and the uncertainty related to potential future terrorist attacks and the war with Iraq; | ||
| The millennium change; | ||
| Conversion to the Euro currency; | ||
| External and internal marketing issues; | ||
| Our announcement of our reduced visibility and increased uncertainty concerning future demand for our products; | ||
| Increased competition; | ||
| Elongated sales cycles; | ||
| A limited number of reference accounts with implementations in the early years of product release; | ||
| Certain design and stability issues in early versions of our products; and | ||
| Lack of desired features and functionality. |
In addition, fluctuations in the price of our common stock may expose us to the risk of securities class action lawsuits. Defending against such lawsuits could result in substantial costs and divert managements attention and resources. Furthermore, any settlement or adverse determination of these lawsuits could subject us to significant liabilities.
Our Gross Margins May Vary Significantly or Decline.
Because the gross margins on product revenues (software licenses and maintenance services) are significantly greater than the gross margins on consulting services revenue, our combined gross margin has fluctuated from quarter to quarter, and it may continue to fluctuate significantly based on revenue mix. Subsequent to the September 11 attack, we believe retailers have changed their buying behavior and that this has resulted in a fundamental shift in the mix of demand for the various types of products we sell. Demand for our Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems has declined and customers now appear to be more interested in buying Strategic Merchandise Management Solutions that require lower levels of services to implement, enable lower inventory levels without reducing sales, and provide a quicker return on investment. The decline in software sales of Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems is having a corollary negative impact on our service revenues as consulting services revenue typically lags the performance of software revenues by as much as one year. As a result of this change in revenue mix, we expect that our consulting services revenue will continue to decline sequentially each quarter until the demand for Portfolio Merchandise Management Systems and the related implementation services returns, or until underlying economic conditions improve. In addition, our gross margins on consulting services revenue vary significantly with the rates at which we utilize our consulting personnel, and as a result, our overall gross margins will be adversely affected when there is not enough work to keep our consultants busy.
28
We May Misjudge When Software Sales Will Be Realized.
Software license revenues in any quarter depend substantially upon contracts signed and the related shipment of software in that quarter. It is therefore difficult for us to accurately predict software license revenues. Because of the timing of our sales, we typically recognize the substantial majority of our software license revenues in the last weeks or days of the quarter, and we may derive a significant portion of our quarterly software license revenues from a small number of relatively large sales. In addition, it is difficult to forecast the timing of large individual software license sales with a high degree of certainty due to the extended length of the sales cycle and the generally more complex contractual terms that may be associated with such licenses that could result in the deferral of some or all of the revenue to future periods. Accordingly, large individual sales have sometimes occurred in quarters subsequent to when we anticipated. We expect these aspects of our business to continue. If we receive any significant cancellation or deferral of customer orders, or we are unable to conclude license negotiations by the end of a fiscal quarter, our operating results may be lower than anticipated. In addition, any weakening or uncertainty in the economy may make it more difficult for us to predict quarterly results in the future, and could negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition for an indefinite period of time.
We May Not Be Able to Reduce Expense Levels If Our Revenues Decline.
Our expense levels are based on our expectations of future revenues. Since software license sales are typically accompanied by a significant amount of consulting and maintenance services, the size of our services organization must be managed to meet our anticipated software license revenues. As a result, we hire and train service personnel and incur research and development costs in advance of anticipated software license revenues. If software license revenues fall short of our expectations, or if we are unable to fully utilize our service personnel, our operating results are likely to decline because a significant portion of our expenses cannot be quickly reduced to respond to any unexpected revenue shortfall.
We May Continue to Encounter Difficulties Successfully Implementing Our Recent Corporate Reorganization.
In fourth quarter 2002 we substantially reorganized our Company to improve the profitability of our operations and to implement our Customer Value Program initiative. As part of this reorganization, we terminated a significant number of personnel both domestically and internationally, reassigned certain existing personnel and added a number of new personnel. We will likely continue to encounter difficulties implementing this extensive and complex reorganization. Potential risks include, but are not limited to: (i) the possibility that we may not be able to successfully persuade enough key E3 and Arthur product development and support personnel to relocate to our corporate headquarters in Scottsdale, Arizona; (ii) the possible disruption in our operations caused by such a large and complex reorganization; (iii) the difficulty of accurately forecasting the timing, amount, and the nature of costs that we will incur in implementing the reorganization, particularly international termination costs, which can be significantly higher than domestic termination costs; and (iv) the possibility that we will not be able to successfully recruit appropriately skilled and experienced personnel to fill new positions.
We Are Dependent Upon The Retail Industry.
Historically, we have derived 80% or more of our revenues from the license of software products and the performance of related services to retail customers. Although the acquisitions of Arthur, Intactix, Zapotec, NeoVista Decision Series and E3 have expanded our product offerings to provide collaborative applications that address new vertical market opportunities with the manufacturers and wholesalers who supply our traditional retail customers, our future growth is critically dependent on increased sales to retail customers. The success of our customers is directly linked to economic conditions in the retail industry, which in turn are subject to intense competitive pressures and are affected by overall economic conditions. In addition, we believe that the licensing of certain of our software products involves a large capital expenditure, which is often accompanied by large-scale hardware purchases or other capital commitments. As a result, demand for our products and services could decline in the event of instability or potential downturns.
We believe the retail industry remains cautious with their level of investment in information technology during the current difficult economic cycle, perhaps due to poor macroeconomic conditions, and uncertainty related
29
to the threat of future terrorist attacks and the war with Iraq. We remain concerned about weak and uncertain economic conditions, consolidations and the disappointing results of retailers in certain of our geographic regions. The retail industry will be negatively impacted if weak economic conditions or fear of additional terrorists attacks and wars persist for an extended period of time. Weak and uncertain economic conditions have in the past, and may in the future, negatively impact our revenues, including a potential deterioration of our maintenance revenue base as customers look to reduce their costs, elongate our selling cycles, and delay, suspend or reduce the demand for our products. As a result, it is difficult in the current economic environment to predict exactly when specific software licenses will close within a six to nine month time frame. In addition, weak and uncertain economic conditions could impair our customers ability to pay for our products or services. Any of these factors could adversely impact our business, quarterly or annual operating results and financial condition.
We also believe that the retail industry may be consolidating, and that the industry is currently experiencing increased competition in certain geographical regions that could negatively impact the industry and our customers ability to pay for our products and services. Such consolidation has in the past, and may in the future, negatively impact our revenues, reduce the demand for our products and may negatively impact our business, operating results and financial condition.
There May Be An Increase in Customer Bankruptcies Due to Weak Economic Conditions.
We have in the past and may in the future be impacted by customer bankruptcies that occur in periods subsequent to the software license sale. During weak economic conditions, such as those currently being experienced in many geographic regions around the world, there is an increased risk that certain of our customers will file bankruptcy. When our customers file bankruptcy, we may be required to forego collection of pre-petition amounts owed and to repay amounts remitted to us during the 90-day preference period preceding the filing. Accounts receivable balances related to pre-petition amounts may in certain of these instances be large due to extended payment terms for software license fees, and significant billings for consulting and implementation services on large projects. The bankruptcy laws, as well as the specific circumstances of each bankruptcy, may severely limit our ability to collect pre-petition amounts, and may force us to disgorge payments made during the 90-day preference period. We also face risk from international customers that file for bankruptcy protection in foreign jurisdictions, in that the application of foreign bankruptcy laws may be less certain or harder to predict. Although we believe that we have sufficient reserves to cover anticipated customer bankruptcies, there can be no assurance that such reserves will be adequate, and if they are not adequate, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.
We May Have Difficulty Attracting And Retaining Skilled Personnel.
Our success is heavily dependent upon our ability to attract, hire, train, retain and motivate skilled personnel, including sales and marketing representatives, qualified software engineers involved in ongoing product development, and consulting personnel who assist in the implementation of our products and services. The market for such individuals is competitive. For example, it may be particularly difficult to attract and retain product development personnel experienced in the Microsoft .Net platform since the .Net platform is a new and evolving technology. Given the critical roles of our sales, product development and consulting staffs, our inability to recruit successfully or any significant loss of key personnel would hurt us. A high level of employee mobility and aggressive recruiting of skilled personnel characterize the software industry. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to retain our current personnel, attract and retain other highly qualified technical and managerial personnel in the future, or be able to assimilate the employees from any acquired businesses. We will continue to adjust the size and composition of the workforce in our services organization to match the different product and geographic demand cycles. If we were unable to attract and retain the necessary technical and managerial personnel, or assimilate the employees from any acquired businesses, our business, operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.
We Have Only Deployed Certain of Our Software Products On a Limited Basis, And Have Not Yet Deployed Some Software Products That Are Important to Our Future Growth.
Certain of our software products, including MMS Multi-Channel, Store Portal, the UNIX/Oracle version of the Portfolio Replenishment module Advanced Warehouse Replenishment by E3, and certain modules of
30
Affinity and Intellect, have been commercially released within the last two years. Other modules of Affinity and Intellect, as well as the UNIX/Oracle version of the Portfolio Replenishment module Advanced Store Replenishment by E3 and the point-of-sale product that we purchased from JCommerce, are still in beta or under development. In addition, we have only recently announced our intentions to develop or acquire a series of business-to-business e-commerce solutions, including products in furtherance of our pursuit of the market for Collaborative Solutions. The markets for these products are new and evolving, and we believe that retailers and their suppliers may be cautious in adopting web-based and other new technologies. Consequently, we cannot predict the growth rate, if any, and size of the markets for our e-commerce products or that these markets will continue to develop. Potential and existing customers may find it difficult, or be unable, to successfully implement our e-commerce products, or may not purchase our products for a variety of reasons, including their inability or unwillingness to deploy sufficient internal personnel and computing resources for a successful implementation. In addition, we must overcome significant obstacles to successfully market our newer products, including limited experience of our sales and consulting personnel. If the markets for our newer products fail to develop, develop more slowly or differently than expected or become saturated with competitors, or if our products are not accepted in the marketplace or are technically flawed, our business, operating results and financial condition will decline.
We Are Investing Heavily in Re-Writing Many of Our Products For The Microsoft.Net Platform.
We currently plan to migrate PMM, as well as starting to re-write the Portfolio Replenishment modules and Portfolio Planning using the Microsoft .Net technology platform (.Net Platform) during 2003. The first .Net Platform products are not scheduled for commercial release until the end of 2003. We also plan to develop new products as well as shared code components using the .Net Platform. The risks of our commitment to the .Net Platform include, but are not limited to, the following:
| The possibility that prospective customers will refrain from purchasing the current versions of products to be re-written because they are waiting for the .Net Platform versions; | ||
| The possibility that our .Net Platform beta customers will not become favorable reference sites; | ||
| Adequate scalability of the .Net Platform for our largest customers; | ||
| The ability of our development staff to learn how to efficiently and effectively develop products using the .Net Platform; | ||
| Our ability to transition our installed base onto the .Net Platform when it is available; | ||
| Microsofts ability to achieve market acceptance of the .Net platform; and | ||
| Microsofts continued commitment to enhancing and marketing the .Net platform. |
Despite efforts to mitigate the risks of the .Net Platform project, there can be no assurances that our efforts to re-write many of our current products and to develop new products using the .Net Platform will be successful. If the .Net Platform project is not successful, it likely will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We May Introduce New Lines of Business Where We Are Less Experienced.
We may introduce new lines of business that are outside our traditional focus on software licenses and related maintenance and implementation services. Introducing new lines of business involves a number of uncertainties, including a lack of internal resources and expertise to operate and grow such new lines of business, immature internal processes and controls, inexperience predicting revenues and expenses for the new lines of business, and the possibility that such new lines of business will divert management attention and resources from our traditional business. The inability of management to effectively develop and operate these new lines of business could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Moreover, we may not be able gain acceptance of any new lines of business in our markets, penetrate new markets successfully, or obtain the anticipated or desired benefits of such new lines of business.
31
There Are Many Risks Associated with International Operations.
Our international revenues represented 46% of total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2003 as compared to 39% in the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 43% for the year ended December 31, 2002. If our international operations grow, we must recruit and hire a number of new consulting, sales and marketing and support personnel in the countries in which we have or will establish offices. Our entry into new international markets typically requires the establishment of new marketing and distribution channels as well as the development and subsequent support of localized versions of our software. International introductions of our products often require a significant investment in advance of anticipated future revenues. The opening of our new offices typically results in initial recruiting and training expenses and reduced labor efficiencies associated with the introduction of products to a new market. If we are less successful in a new market than we expect, we may not be able to realize an adequate return on our initial investment and our operating results could suffer. We cannot guarantee that the countries in which we operate will have a sufficient pool of qualified personnel from which to hire, that we will be successful at hiring, training or retaining such personnel, or that we can expand or contract our international operations in a timely, cost effective manner.
Our international business operations are subject to risks associated with international activities, including:
| Currency fluctuations; | ||
| Higher operating costs due to local laws or regulations; | ||
| Unexpected changes in employment and other regulatory requirements; | ||
| Tariffs and other trade barriers; | ||
| Costs and risks of localizing products for foreign countries; | ||
| Longer accounts receivable payment cycles in certain countries; | ||
| Potentially negative tax consequences; | ||
| Difficulties in staffing and managing geographically disparate operations; | ||
| Greater difficulty in safeguarding intellectual property, licensing and other trade restrictions; | ||
| Repatriation of earnings; | ||
| The burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws; | ||
| Anti-American sentiment due to the war with Iraq, and other American policies that may be unpopular in certain regions; | ||
| The effects of regional and global infectious diseases such as SARS; and | ||
| General economic conditions in international markets. |
Consulting services in support of certain international software licenses typically have lower gross margins than those achieved domestically due to generally lower billing rates and/or higher costs in certain of our international markets. Accordingly, any significant growth in our international operations may result in declines in gross margins on consulting services. We expect that an increasing portion of our international software license, consulting services and maintenance services revenues will be denominated in foreign currencies, subjecting us to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. As we continue to expand our international operations, exposures to gains and losses on foreign currency transactions may increase. We may choose to limit such exposure by entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts or engaging in similar hedging strategies. We cannot guarantee that any currency exchange strategy would be successful in avoiding exchange-related losses. In addition, revenues
32
earned in various countries where we do business may be subject to taxation by more than one jurisdiction, which would reduce our earnings.
We May Face Difficulties In Our Highly Competitive Markets, Particularly if The Current Weak Economic Conditions Persist.
The markets for our software products are highly competitive. However, we believe the number of significant competitors in many of our application markets has diminished over the past five years. We believe the principal competitive factors in our markets are feature and functionality, product reputation and reference accounts, retail and supply chain industry expertise, total solution cost and quality of customer support. We believe that pricing pressure has increased in response to the economic downturn, which could cause us to offer more significant discounts, or in some cases to lose potential business to competitors willing to offer what we believe to be overly aggressive discounts. We encounter competitive products from a different set of vendors in each of our primary product categories.
Our Retail Enterprise Systems compete complete primarily with Retek, Inc., and with internally developed systems and other third-party developers such as Essentus, Inc., GERS, Inc., Marketmax, Inc., Micro Strategies Incorporated, Evant, Inc. (formerly Nonstop Solutions), NSB Retail Systems PLC, SAP AG, and SVI Holdings, Inc. In addition, new competitors may enter our markets and offer merchandise management systems that target the retail industry.
The competition for our In-Store Systems is more fragmented than the competition for our Retail Enterprise Systems. We compete primarily with small point-of-sale focused companies such as CRS Business Computers, Datavantage, Inc., 360 Commerce, Tomax Technologies and Triversity, Inc. We also compete with other broad solution set providers such as NSB Retail Systems PLC and Retek, Inc.
Our current Collaborative Solutions compete primarily with products from Marketmax, Inc., Evant Inc. (formerly Nonstop Solutions), AC Nielsen Corporation, i2 Technologies, Manugistics Group, Inc., Information Resources, Inc., and Synchra Systems.
In the market for consulting services, we have pursued a strategy of forming informal working relationships with leading retail systems integrators such as Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, Kurt Salmon Associates and IBM Consulting Services (formerly PriceWaterhouseCoopers). These integrators, as well as independent consulting firms such as Accenture, IBM Global Services, AIG Netplex, CFT Consulting, Lakewest Consulting, SPL and ID Applications, also represent competition to our consulting services group. Moreover, because many of these consulting firms are involved in advising our prospective customers in the software selection process, they may successfully encourage a prospective customer to select software from a software company with whom they have a relationship. Examples of such relationships between consulting firms and software companies include the relationships between Retek, Inc. and Accenture, and between Retek, Inc. and IBM Global Services.
As we continue to develop or acquire e-commerce products and expand our business in the Collaborative Solutions area, we expect to face potential competition from business-to-business e-commerce application providers, including Ariba, Commerce One, Commercialware, i2 Technologies, Manugistics Group, Inc., Microsoft, Inc., Retek, Inc., SAP AG, Synchra Systems, Ecometry Corporation, and others. A few of our existing competitors, as well as a number of potential new competitors, have significantly greater financial, technical, marketing and other resources than we do, which could provide them with a significant competitive advantage over us. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete successfully against our current or future competitors, or that competition will not have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
It May Be Difficult to Identify, Adopt And Develop Product Architecture That is Compatible With Emerging Industry Standards.
The markets for our software products are characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, changes in customer requirements and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. We continuously evaluate new technologies and implement into our products advanced technology such as our current .Net effort. However, if we fail in our product development efforts to accurately address in a timely manner,
33
evolving industry standards, new technology advancements or important third-party interfaces or product architectures, sales of our products and services will suffer.
Our software products can be licensed with a variety of popular industry standard platforms, and are authored in various development environments using different programming languages and underlying databases and architectures. There may be future or existing platforms that achieve popularity in the marketplace that may not be compatible with our software product design. Developing and maintaining consistent software product performance across various technology platforms could place a significant strain on our resources and software product release schedules, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
We May Have Difficulty Implementing Our Products.
Our software products are complex and perform or directly affect mission-critical functions across many different functional and geographic areas of the enterprise. Consequently, implementation of our software products can be a lengthy process, and commitment of resources by our clients is subject to a number of significant risks over which we have little or no control. Although average implementation times have recently declined, we believe the implementation of the UNIX/Oracle versions of our products can be longer and more complicated than our other applications as they typically (i) appeal to larger retailers who have multiple divisions requiring multiple implementation projects, (ii) require the execution of implementation procedures in multiple layers of software, (iii) offer a retailer more deployment options and other configuration choices, and (iv) may involve third party integrators to change business processes concurrent with the implementation of the software. Delays in the implementations of any of our software products, whether by our business partners or us, may result in client dissatisfaction, disputes with our customers, or damage to our reputation. Significant problems implementing our software therefore, can cause delays or prevent us from collecting license fees for our software and can damage our ability to get new business.
Our Fixed-Price Service Contracts May Result In Losses.
We offer a combination of software products, consulting and maintenance services to our customers. Typically, we enter into service agreements with our customers that provide for consulting services on a time and expenses basis. Certain clients have asked for, and we have from time to time entered into, fixed-price service contracts, which link services payments, and occasionally software payments, to implementation milestones. We believe fixed-price service contracts may increasingly be offered by our competitors to differentiate their product and service offerings. As a result, we may need to enter into more fixed-price contracts in the future. If we are unable to meet our contractual obligations under fixed-price contracts within our estimated cost structure, our operating results could suffer.
Our Success Depends Upon Our Proprietary Technology.
Our success and competitive position is dependent in part upon our ability to develop and maintain the proprietary aspect of our technology. The reverse engineering, unauthorized copying, or other misappropriation of our technology could enable third parties to benefit from our technology without paying for it.
We rely on a combination of trademark, trade secret, copyright law and contractual restrictions to protect the proprietary aspects of our technology. We seek to protect the source code to our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws. To date, we have not protected our technology with issued patents. Effective copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries. We license our software products under signed license agreements that impose restrictions on the licensees ability to utilize the software and do not permit the re-sale, sublicense or other transfer of the source code. Finally, we seek to avoid disclosure of our intellectual property by requiring employees and independent consultants to execute confidentiality agreements with us and by restricting access to our source code.
There has been a substantial amount of litigation in the software and Internet industries regarding intellectual property rights. It is possible that in the future third parties may claim that our current or potential future software solutions or we infringe on their intellectual property. We expect that software product developers and providers of e-commerce products will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlap.
34
Moreover, as software patents become more common, the likelihood increases that a patent holder will bring an infringement action against us, or against our customers, to whom we have indemnification obligations. In addition, we may find it necessary to initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of our proprietary rights or to protect our trade secrets. Since we now resell hardware we may also become subject to claims from third parties that the hardware, or the combination of hardware and software, infringe their intellectual property. Although we may disclaim certain intellectual property representations to our customers, these disclaimers may not be sufficient to fully protect us against such claims. We may be more vulnerable to patent claims since we do not have any patents that we can assert defensively against a patent infringement claim. Any claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or license agreements. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
If We Lose Access to Critical Third-Party Software or Technology, Our Costs Could Increase And The Introduction of New Products And Product Enhancements Could be Delayed, Potentially Hurting Our Competitive Position.
We license and integrate technology from third parties in certain of our software products. For example, we license the Uniface client/server application development technology from Compuware, Inc. for use in PMM, certain applications from Silvon Software, Inc. for use in IDEAS, IBMs Net.commerce merchant server software for use in MMS Multi-Channel, and the Syncsort application for use in Portfolio Planning. These third party licenses generally require us to pay royalties and fulfill confidentiality obligations. If we are unable to continue to license any of this third party software, or if the third party licensors do not adequately maintain or update their products, we would face delays in the releases of our software until equivalent technology can be identified, licensed or developed, and integrated into our software products. These delays, if they occur, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. It is also possible that intellectual property acquired from third parties through acquisitions, mergers, licenses or otherwise may not have been adequately protected.
We May Face Liability If Our Products Are Defective Or If We Make Errors Implementing Our Products.
Our software products are highly complex and sophisticated. As a result, they may occasionally contain design defects or software errors that could be difficult to detect and correct. In addition, implementation of our products may involve customer-specific configuration by third parties or us, and may involve integration with systems developed by third parties. In particular, it is common for complex software programs, such as our UNIX/Oracle and e-commerce software products, to contain undetected errors when first released. They are discovered only after the product has been implemented and used over time with different computer systems and in a variety of applications and environments. Despite extensive testing, we have in the past discovered certain defects or errors in our products or custom configurations only after our software products have been used by many clients. In addition, our clients may occasionally experience difficulties integrating our products with other hardware or software in their environment that are unrelated to defects in our products. Such defects, errors or difficulties may cause future delays in product introductions and shipments, result in increased costs and diversion of development resources, require design modifications or impair customer satisfaction with our products.
We believe that significant investments in research and development are required to remain competitive, and that speed to market is critical to our success. Our future performance will depend in large part on our ability to enhance our existing products through internal development and strategic partnering, internally develop new products which leverage both our existing customers and sales force, and strategically acquire complementary retail point and collaborative solutions that add functionality for specific business processes to an enterprise-wide system. If clients experience significant problems with implementation of our products or are otherwise dissatisfied with their functionality or performance or if they fail to achieve market acceptance for any reason, our business, operating results and financial condition would suffer.
We Are Dependent on Key Personnel.
Our performance depends in large part on the continued performance of our executive officers and other key employees, particularly the performance and services of James D. Armstrong our Chief Executive Officer and Hamish N. Brewer our President. We do not have in place key person life insurance policies on any of our
35
employees. The loss of the services of Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Brewer, or other key executive officers or employees without a successor in place could negatively affect our financial performance.
We May Have Difficulty Integrating Acquisitions.
We continually evaluate potential acquisitions of complementary businesses, products and technologies, including those that are significant in size and scope. In pursuit of our strategy to acquire complementary products, we completed the acquisition of the assets of Zapotec Software, Inc. in February 2001, and the NeoVista Decision Series from Accrue Software, Inc. in June 2001, and the acquisition of all the common stock of E3 in September 2001, and the acquisition of certain intellectual property from JCommerce in April 2002. The E3 acquisition was our largest to date, and involved the integration of E3s products and operations in 12 countries. We recently acquired certain intellectual property from Vista Software Solutions, Inc. on April 30, 2003. The risks we commonly encounter in acquisitions include:
| We may have difficulty assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired company; | ||
| We may have difficulty effectively integrating the acquired technologies or products with our current products and technologies; | ||
| Our ongoing business may be disrupted by transition and integration issues; | ||
| We may not be able to retain key technical and managerial personnel from the acquired business; | ||
| We may be unable to achieve the financial and strategic goals for the acquired and combined businesses; | ||
| We may have difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration; | ||
| Our relationships with partner companies or third-party providers of technology or products could be adversely affected; | ||
| Our relationships with employees and customers could be impaired; | ||
| Our due diligence process may fail to identify significant issues with product quality, product architecture, legal contingencies, and product development, among other things; and | ||
| We may be required to sustain significant exit charges if products acquired in business combinations are unsuccessful. |
It May Become Increasingly Expensive to Obtain And Maintain Liability Insurance at Current Levels.
We contract for insurance to cover a variety of potential risks and liabilities. In the current market, insurance coverage is becoming more restrictive and expensive, and when certain insurance coverage is offered, the deductible for which we are responsible is larger. In light of these circumstances, it may become more difficult to maintain insurance coverage at historical levels, or if such coverage is available, the cost to obtain or maintain it may increase substantially. This may result in our being forced to bear the burden of an increased portion of risks for which we have traditionally been covered by insurance, which could negatively impact the Companys results of operations.
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to certain market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks result primarily from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. In addition, our international operations are subject to risks related to differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, and other regulations and restrictions.
36
Foreign currency exchange rates. Our international operations expose us to foreign currency exchange rate changes that could impact translations of foreign denominated assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars and future earnings and cash flows from transactions denominated in different currencies. International revenues represented 46% of our total revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2002, as compared with 39% in the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 43% in the year ended December 31, 2002. In addition, the identifiable net assets of our foreign operations totaled 21% of consolidated net assets at March 31, 2003 as compared to 20% of consolidated assets at December 31, 2002. Our exposure to currency exchange rate changes is diversified due to the number of different countries in which we conduct business. We operate outside the United States primarily through wholly owned subsidiaries in Europe, Asia/Pacific, Canada and Latin America. We have determined that the functional currency of each of our foreign subsidiaries is the local currency and as such, foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of stockholders equity. Changes in the currency exchange rates of our foreign subsidiaries resulted in our reporting unrealized foreign currency exchange loss of $1.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to a loss of $301,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2002. We did not engage in any material foreign currency hedging transactions during 2002 or the three months ended March 31, 2003. Foreign currency gains and losses will continue to result from fluctuations in the value of the currencies in which we conduct operations as compared to the U.S. Dollar, and future operating results will be affected to some extent by gains and losses from foreign currency exposure. We prepared sensitivity analyses of our exposures from foreign net working capital as of March 31, 2003, to assess the impact of hypothetical changes in foreign currency rates. Based upon the results of these analyses, a 10% adverse change in all foreign currency rates from the March 31, 2003 rates would result in a currency translation loss of $1.5 million before tax.
Interest rates. We invest our cash in a variety of financial instruments, including bank time deposits, and variable and fixed rate obligations of the U.S. Government and its agencies, states, municipalities, commercial paper and corporate bonds. These investments are denominated in U.S. dollars. We classify all of our investments as available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Cash balances in foreign currencies overseas are operating balances and are invested in short-term deposits of the local operating bank. Interest income earned on our investments is reflected in our financial statements under the caption Other income, net. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates, or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have suffered a decline in market value due to a change in interest rates. We hold our investment securities for purposes other than trading. The fair value of securities held at March 31, 2003 was $36.8 million, which is approximately the same as amortized cost, with interest rates generally ranging between 1% and 3%.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-14(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as of a date (the Evaluation Date) within 90 days of the filing date of this report. Based on their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective, but also concluded that there are certain weaknesses in our Information Technology area (IT), including access security and change control. We have dedicated resources to correcting these issues and are in the process of implementing the necessary corrections. These weaknesses did not have a material impact on the accuracy of our financial statements.
Changes in Internal Controls. Other than the steps we have taken, or are in the process of taking, to correct certain weaknesses in our IT area with respect to access security and change control, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls, as such term is defined under Section 13(b) of the Exchange Act, or to our knowledge, in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date, including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
37
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. Although there can be no assurance, management does not believe that the disposition of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K:
(a) | Exhibits: See Exhibit Index | ||
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K | ||
We filed a Form 8-K dated April 2, 2003 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2003 to furnish copies of our April 2, 2003 press release announcing preliminary financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, our April 21, 2003 press release announcing final financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, and the transcript of our First Quarter 2003 Earnings Release Conference Call. In addition, the Form 8-K included a discussion of the non-GAAP measure of earnings (loss) per share provided in the April 21, 2003 press release. | |||
In accordance with the procedural guidance in SEC Release No. 33-8216, the information provided in this Form 8-K and the Exhibits attached thereto was furnished under Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure rather than under Item 12. Disclosure of Results of Operations and Financial Condition. The information in the Form 8-K and the Exhibits attached thereto shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. |
38
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
JDA SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. | ||||
Dated: May 13, 2003 | By: | /s/ Kristen L. Magnuson | ||
Kristen L. Magnuson Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
39
FORM 10-Q CERTIFICATIONS
I, James D. Armstrong, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JDA Software Group, Inc.; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; | |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: May 13, 2003 | By: | /s/ James D. Armstrong | ||
James D. Armstrong Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
40
I, Kristen L. Magnuson, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of JDA Software Group, Inc.; | |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; | |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; | |
4. | The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. | The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: May 13, 2003 | By: | /s/ Kristen L. Magnuson | ||
Kristen L. Magnuson Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
41
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit # | Description of Document | |||
2.1** | | Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of June 4, 1998, by and among JDA Software Group, Inc., JDA Software, Inc. and Comshare, Incorporated. | ||
2.2## | | Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of February 24, 2000, by and among JDA Software Group, Inc., Pricer AB, and Intactix International, Inc. | ||
2.3### | | Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of September 7, 2001, by and among JDA Software Group, Inc., E3 Acquisition Corp., E3 Corporation and certain shareholders of E3 Corporation. | ||
3.1#### | | Third Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company together with Certificate of Amendment dated July 23, 2002. | ||
3.2*** | | First Amended and Restated Bylaws. | ||
4.1* | | Specimen Common Stock certificate. | ||
4.2*(1) | | Stock Redemption Agreement among the Company, James D. Armstrong and Frederick M. Pakis dated March 30, 1995. | ||
10.1*(1) | | Form of Indemnification Agreement. | ||
10.2*(1) | | 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended, and form of agreement thereunder. | ||
10.3ww(1) | | 1996 Stock Option Plan, as amended. | ||
10.4*(1) | | 1996 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan and forms of agreement thereunder. | ||
10.5 (1)#### | | Executive Employment Agreement between James D. Armstrong and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated July 23, 2002. | ||
10.6**** (1) | | Executive Employment Agreement between Hamish N. Brewer and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated January 22, 2003. | ||
10.7 (1)#### | | Executive Employment Agreement between Kristen L. Magnuson and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated July 23, 2002. | ||
10.8#(1) | | 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan. | ||
10.9#(1) | | 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | ||
10.10 | | 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. | ||
10.11*** | | Lease Agreement between Opus West Corporation and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated April 30, 1998, together with First Amendment dated June 30, 1998. | ||
10.12** | | Software License Agreement dated as of June 4, 1998 by and between Comshare, Incorporated and JDA Software, Inc. | ||
10.14wwww(2) | | Value-Added Reseller License Agreement for Uniface Software between Compuware Corporation and JDA Software Group, Inc. dated April 1, 2000, together with Product Schedule No. Two dated September 28, 2001. | ||
10.15*(1) | | JDA Software, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, adopted as amended effective January 1, 1995. | ||
10.17***(1) | | Form of Amendment of Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc and Kristen L. Magnuson, amending certain stock options granted to Ms. Magnuson pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan on September 11, 1997 and January 27, 1998. | ||
10.18(1) | | Form of Rights Agreement between the Company and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, as Rights Agent (including as Exhibit A the Form of Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Terms of the Series A Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B the From of Right Certificate, and as Exhibit C the Summary of Terms and Rights Agreement). | ||
10.19(1) | | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc. and Kristen L. Magnuson to be used in connection with stock option grants to Ms. Magnuson pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan. |
42
Exhibit # | Description of Document | |||
10.20w(1)(3) | | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc. and certain Senior Executive Officers to be used in connection with stock options granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan. | ||
10.21w (1)(3) | | Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc. and certain Senior Executive Officers to be used in connection with stock options granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan. | ||
10.22w(1) (4) | | Form of Amendment of Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc and certain Senior Executive Officers, amending certain stock options granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan | ||
10.23w(1)(5) | | Form of Amendment of Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc and certain Senior Executive Officers, amending certain stock options granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan | ||
10.24w(1)(6) | | Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc. and certain Senior Executive Officers to be used in connection with stock options granted pursuant to the JDA Software Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan | ||
10.25www | | Secured Loan Agreement between JDA Software Group, Inc. and Silvon Software, Inc. dated May 8, 2001, together with Secured Promissory Note and Security Agreement. | ||
99.1 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer | ||
99.2 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
* | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-748), declared effective on March 14, 1996. | |
** | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 4, 1998, as filed on June 19, 1998. | |
*** | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1998, as filed on August 14, 1998. | |
**** | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed on March 19, 2003. | |
| Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999, as filed on August 19, 1999. | |
| Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 2, 1998, as filed on October 28, 1998. | |
| Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1998, as filed on November 13, 1998. | |
# | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, as filed on March 31, 1998. | |
## | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 24, 2000, as filed on March 1, 2000. | |
### | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2001, as filed on September 21, 2001. | |
#### | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, as filed on November 12, 2002. | |
w | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999, as filed on March 16, 2000. | |
ww | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as filed on April 2, 2001. | |
www | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001, as filed on August 14, 2001. | |
wwww | Incorporated by reference to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, as filed on March 29, 2002. |
43
(1) | Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements covering executive officers or directors of the Company. | |
(2) | Confidential treatment has been granted as to part of this exhibit. | |
(3) | Applies to James D. Armstrong. | |
(4) | Applies to Hamish N. Brewer and Gregory L. Morrison. | |
(5) | Applies to Hamish N. Brewer, Peter J. Charness, Scott D. Hines, Gregory L. Morrison and David J. Tidmarsh. | |
(6) | Applies to Senior Executive Officers with the exception of James D. Armstrong and Kristen L. Magnuson. |
44