Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

(X)  Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For the Quarter ended September 30, 2002

(   )  Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For Transition Period from                     to      

Commission File Number 000-30447


VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Washington
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  91-1913479
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
1307 East Main, Puyallup, Washington
(Address of principal executive offices)
  98372
(Zip Code)

(253) 848-2316
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes   [X]      No   [   ]

The number of shares of the issuer’s Common Stock, $1.00 par value, outstanding at November 1, 2002 was 1,126,866.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
EXHIBIT 99.1
EXHIBIT 99.2


Table of Contents

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                 
            Page
           
PART I
  FINANCIAL INFORMATION        
 
Item 1.
  Financial Statements        
 
        Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet — September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001     1  
 
        Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income — Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001     2  
 
        Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001     3  
 
        Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements     4  
 
Item 2.
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operation     8  
 
Item 3.
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk     20  
 
Item 4.
  Controls and Procedures     21  
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS     21  
 
PART II
  OTHER INFORMATION     22  
 
        Signatures     23  
 
        Certifications     24  

i


Table of Contents

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
                       
          September 30,   December 31,
          2002   2001
         
 
ASSETS
               
 
Cash and due from banks
  $ 6,981     $ 4,584  
 
Interest-bearing deposits with banks
    11,231       14,083  
 
Federal funds sold
    1,247          
 
Securities available-for-sale
    33,213       31,350  
 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
    398       478  
 
   
     
 
 
    53,070       50,495  
 
Loans
    111,655       100,755  
 
Less allowance for loan losses
    1,320       1,156  
 
   
     
 
     
Loans, net
    110,335       99,599  
 
Accrued interest receivable
    795       777  
 
Premises and equipment, net
    6,065       5,831  
 
Real estate held for investment
    224       224  
 
Other assets
    491       248  
 
   
     
 
     
Total assets
  $ 170,980     $ 157,174  
 
   
     
 
LIABILITIES
               
 
Deposits
               
   
Noninterest-bearing
  $ 29,391     $ 24,770  
   
Interest-bearing
    116,878       109,930  
 
   
     
 
     
Total deposits
    146,269       134,700  
 
Other borrowed funds
    616       334  
 
Accrued interest payable
    276       390  
 
Other liabilities
    1,462       589  
 
   
     
 
     
Total liabilities
    148,623       136,013  
 
   
     
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
 
Common stock, par value $1 per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 1,126,866 and 1,126,750 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively
    1,127       1,127  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    15,955       15,953  
 
Retained earnings
    4,662       3,776  
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
    613       305  
 
   
     
 
     
Total stockholders’ equity
    22,357       21,161  
 
   
     
 
     
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 170,980     $ 157,174  
 
   
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

-1-


Table of Contents

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
                                     
        Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
        September 30,   September 30,
       
 
        2002   2001   2002   2001
       
 
 
 
INTEREST INCOME
                               
 
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 2,081     $ 2,042     $ 6,027     $ 6,116  
 
Interest on federal funds sold and deposits in banks
    87       192       255       619  
 
Interest on securities
    365       438       1,131       1,242  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Total interest income
    2,533       2,672       7,413       7,977  
 
   
     
     
     
 
INTEREST EXPENSE
                               
 
Interest on deposits
    467       854       1,443       2,768  
 
Interest on federal funds and other short-term borrowings
    2       3       5       12  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Total interest expense
    469       857       1,448       2,780  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Net interest income
    2,064       1,815       5,965       5,197  
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
    76               167       62  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    1,988       1,815       5,798       5,135  
 
   
     
     
     
 
NONINTEREST INCOME
                               
 
Service charges
    121       96       344       284  
 
Gain on sale of investment securities, net
    1       44       54       54  
 
Origination fees on mortgage loans brokered
    40       20       79       85  
 
Other operating income
    40       92       184       241  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Total noninterest income
    202       252       661       664  
 
   
     
     
     
 
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
                               
 
Salaries
    630       541       1,750       1,590  
 
Employee benefits
    149       129       446       411  
 
Occupancy
    128       144       383       425  
 
Equipment
    102       126       340       385  
 
Other operating expenses
    421       381       1,231       1,198  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Total noninterest expense
    1,430       1,321       4,150       4,009  
 
   
     
     
     
 
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX
    760       746       2,309       1,790  
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAX
    257       220       747       521  
 
   
     
     
     
 
NET INCOME
  $ 503     $ 526     $ 1,562     $ 1,269  
 
   
     
     
     
 
EARNINGS PER SHARE
                               
 
Basic
  $ 0.45     $ 0.46     $ 1.39     $ 1.12  
 
Diluted
  $ 0.44     $ 0.46     $ 1.37     $ 1.10  
 
Weighted average shares outstanding
    1,126,777       1,133,588       1,126,759       1,133,588  
 
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
    1,137,073       1,151,067       1,137,337       1,151,971  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

-2-


Table of Contents

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
                       
          Nine Months Ended
          September 30,
         
          2002   2001
         
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
               
 
Net income
  $ 1,562     $ 1,269  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
               
   
Provisions for loan losses
    167       62  
   
Depreciation
    268       349  
   
Deferred income tax
    6       2  
   
Net amortization on securities
    136       47  
   
FHLB stock dividends
    (24 )     (24 )
   
Gain on sale of securities available-for-sale
    (54 )     (54 )
   
Loss on sale of premises and equipment
    41       2  
   
Amortization of intangible assets
    18          
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
   
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest receivable
    (18 )     92  
   
Increase (decrease) in other assets
    (215 )     163  
   
Decrease in accrued interest payable
    (114 )     (69 )
   
Increase in other liabilities
    731       74  
 
   
     
 
     
Net cash from operating activities
    2,504       1,913  
 
   
     
 
 
Net increase in federal funds sold
    (1,247 )        
 
Net decrease (increase) in interest-bearing deposits with banks
    2,852       (11,179 )
 
Purchase of securities available-for-sale
    (12,786 )     (15,650 )
 
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale
    5,567       3,055  
 
Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale
    5,741       12,679  
 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock redeemed
    104          
 
Net increase in loans
    (10,903 )     (3,801 )
 
Additions to premises and equipment
    (468 )     (258 )
 
Purchase of intangible assets
    (144 )        
 
   
     
 
     
Net cash from investing activities
    (11,284 )     (15,154 )
 
   
     
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
 
Net increase in deposits
    11,569       14,722  
 
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowed funds
    186       (48 )
 
Increase in other borrowed money
    96          
 
Stock options exercised
    2          
 
Cash dividends paid
    (676 )     (623 )
 
   
     
 
     
Net cash from financing activities
    11,177       14,051  
 
   
     
 
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
    2,397       810  
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS, beginning of year
    4,584       4,466  
 
   
     
 
CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS, at end of period
  $ 6,981     $ 5,276  
 
   
     
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
               
 
Cash payments for
               
   
Interest
  $ 1,562     $ 2,849  
   
Income taxes
    778       167  
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES
               
 
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale
  $ 467     $ 582  
 
Deferred tax on unrealized (gains) losses on securities available-for-sale
    (159 )     (198 )
 
Held-to-maturity securities transferred to securities available-for-sale
            279  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

-3-


Table of Contents

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

Valley Community Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) has prepared the condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001 without audit by the Company’s independent auditors. However, the financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods included herein have been made. The consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2001 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of that date. The results of operations for the three-months and nine months ended September 30, 2002, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2002.

Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. Therefore, these consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with a reading of the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2001 and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain amounts in the 2001 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation.

Note 2 — Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share amounts are computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period after giving retroactive effect to stock dividends and stock splits. Diluted earnings per share amounts are computed by determining the number of additional shares that are deemed outstanding due to stock options under the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three-months and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts).

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Earnings Per Share
                                   
      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30,   September 30,
     
 
      2002   2001   2002   2001
     
 
 
 
NUMERATOR:
                               
Net income
  $ 503     $ 526     $ 1,562     $ 1,269  
DENOMINATOR:
                               
Denominator for basic earnings per share:
                               
 
Weighted average shares
    1,126,777       1,133,588       1,126,759       1,133,588  
 
Effect of diluted securities — stock options
    10,296       17,479       10,578       18,383  
Denominator for diluted earnings per share:
                               
 
Weighted average shares and assumed conversion of diluted stock options
    1,137,073       1,151,067       1,137,337       1,151,971  
Basic earnings per share
  $ 0.45     $ 0.46     $ 1.39     $ 1.12  
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 0.44     $ 0.46     $ 1.37     $ 1.10  

-4-


Table of Contents

Note 3 — Investment Securities

Investment securities have been classified according to management’s intent. The carrying amount of securities and their estimated fair values are as follows (in thousands):

September 30, 2002

Securities Available-For-Sale

                                 
            Gross   Gross        
    Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair
    Cost   Gains   Losses   Value
   
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government corporations and agencies
  $ 9,695     $ 234     $       $ 9,929  
State and political subdivisions
    6,783       372               7,155  
Mortgage-backed securities
    15,807       331       9       16,129  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
  $ 32,285     $ 937     $ 9     $ 33,213  
 
   
     
     
     
 

December 31, 2001

Securities Available-For-Sale

                                 
            Gross   Gross        
    Amortized   Unrealized   Unrealized   Fair
    Cost   Gains   Losses   Value
   
 
 
 
U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government corporations and agencies
  $ 9,383     $ 219     $ 23     $ 9,579  
State and political subdivisions
    6,743       115       7       6,851  
Mortgage-backed securities
    14,763       167       10       14,920  
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
  $ 30,889     $ 501     $ 40     $ 31,350  
 
   
     
     
     
 

-5-


Table of Contents

Note 4 — Loans

The major classifications of loans at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Loan Portfolio
(dollars in thousands)

                                     
        September 30,   December 31,
        2002   2001
       
 
        Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent
       
 
 
 
Real Estate
                               
 
Construction
  $ 14,749       13.2 %   $ 11,550       11.5 %
 
Mortgage
    16,164       14.5 %     14,689       14.6 %
 
Commercial
    52,237       46.7 %     54,187       53.7 %
Commercial
    25,725       23.0 %     16,477       16.3 %
Consumer and other
    2,396       2.1 %     3,197       3.2 %
Lease financing
    493       0.4 %     745       0.7 %
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Total loans
    111,764       100.0 %     100,845       100.0 %
 
           
             
 
Deferred loan fees
    (109 )             (90 )        
 
   
             
         
   
Net loans
  $ 111,655             $ 100,755          
 
   
             
         

Note 5 — Allowance for Loan Losses

Management analyzes the loan portfolio to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and the appropriate provision required to maintain an adequate allowance. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, management reviews the size, quality and risks of loans in the portfolio and considers factors such as specific known risks, past experience, the status and amount of nonperforming assets and economic conditions. A specific percentage is allocated to each major classification and not specifically reserved while additional amounts are added for individual loans considered to have specific loss potential. Loans identified as losses are charged-off. Based on total allocations, the provision is recorded to maintain the allowance at a level deemed appropriate by management. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, there can be no assurance that future additions to the allowance will not be necessary.

The allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2002 totaled $1,320,000 representing a net increase of $164,000 or 14.2% compared to $1,156,000 at December 31, 2001. The increase is primarily due to the increase in loans since December 31, 2001 and is not related to any specifically identified problem loan. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2002 adequately reflects the risks in the loan portfolio. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize changes to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examination.

The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for loan losses (dollars in thousands):

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Loan Loss Experience

                                       
        Three months September 30,   Nine months September 30,
       
 
        2002   2001   2002   2001
       
 
 
 
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 1,249     $ 1,162     $ 1,156     $ 1,096  
 
Charge-offs
    5               5          
 
Recoveries:
                    2       4  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Net recoveries
    5       -0-       3       (4 )
 
Additions charged to operations
    76               167       62  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Balance at end of period
  $ 1,320     $ 1,162     $ 1,320     $ 1,162  
 
   
     
     
     
 

-6-


Table of Contents

Note 6 — Impact of New Accounting Issues

During the year 2002 the Company adopted the following accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standard Board.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, addresses financial accounting and reporting for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets and supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, Intangible Assets. It addresses how intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets (but not those acquired in a business combination) should be accounted for in financial statements upon their acquisition. This Statement also addresses how goodwill and other intangible assets should be accounted for after they have been initially recognized in the financial statements. The Company implemented this statement effective January 1, 2002. Implementation of this statement did not result in a material impact on its financial position or results of operation.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This Statement supersedes FASB Statement No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, for the disposal of a segment of a business (as previously defined in that Opinion). This Statement also amends ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to eliminate the exception to consolidation for a subsidiary for which control is likely to be temporary. The Company implemented this statement effective January 1, 2002. Implementation of this statement did not result in a material impact on its financial position or results of operation.

Statement of Financial Standard (SFAS) No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. This Statement rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, and an amendment of that Statement, FASB Statement No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements. This Statement also rescinds FASB Statement No. 44, Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 13, Accounting for Leases, to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. This Statement also amends other existing authoritative pronouncements to make various technical corrections, clarify meanings, or describe their applicability under changed conditions. The Company implemented this statement effective April 1, 2002. Implementation of this statement did not result in a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, addresses financial accounting and reporting for the treatment of costs associated with exit or disposal activities. This Statement improves financial reporting by requiring that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. This Statement replaces EITF Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity. The provisions of this Statement are to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company does not expect the Statement will result in a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9. The provisions of this Statement that relate to the application of the purchase method of accounting applies to all acquisitions of financial institutions, except transactions between two or more mutual enterprises. This Statement removes acquisitions of financial institutions from the scope of both Statement 72 and Interpretation 9 and requires that those transactions be accounted for in accordance with FASB Statements No. 141, Business Combinations, and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. In addition, this Statement amends FASB Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, to include in its scope long-term customer-relationship intangible assets of financial institutions such as depositor- and borrower-relationship intangible assets and credit cardholder intangible assets. This Statement is effective for acquisitions for which the date of acquisition is on or after October 1, 2002. The Company does not expect the Statement will result in a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

-7-


Table of Contents

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Valley Community Bancshares, Inc.

Valley Community Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company was organized and incorporated under the laws of the State of Washington as a holding company for its principal banking subsidiary, Puyallup Valley Bank, a state chartered, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) insured commercial bank, through a reorganization completed on July 1, 1998. The Company conducts its business primarily through Puyallup Valley Bank, but in January 1999 the Company opened Valley Bank, a state chartered FDIC insured commercial bank subsidiary located in Auburn, Washington. Puyallup Valley Bank and Valley Bank are referred to as the “Banks” in this Form 10-Q.

The Company’s main office is located in Puyallup, Washington, which also serves as the main office of Puyallup Valley Bank. Valley Bank is located in Auburn, Washington. The Banks provide a full range of commercial banking services to small and medium-sized businesses, professionals and other individuals through banking offices located in Puyallup, Auburn, and Kent, Washington, and their environs.

The principal source of the Company’s revenue are (i) interest and fees on loans; (ii) deposit service charges; (iii) merchant credit card processing fees; (iv) interest bearing deposits with banks; (v) interest on investments (principally government securities) and (vi) origination fees on mortgage loans brokered. The Bank’s lending activity consists of short-to-medium-term commercial and consumer loans, including operating loans and lines of credit, equipment loans, automobile loans, recreational vehicle and truck loans, personal loans or lines of credit, home improvement loans and rehabilitation loans. The Banks also offer cash management services, merchant credit card processing, safe deposit boxes, wire transfers, direct deposit of payroll and social security checks, automated teller machine access, and automatic drafts for various accounts.

Puyallup Valley Bank

Puyallup Valley Bank is a Washington state-chartered commercial bank, which commenced operations in October 1973. The Bank provides full-service banking to businesses and residents within the Puyallup community and its surrounding area. Puyallup Valley Bank places particular emphasis on serving the small to medium-sized business segment of the market by making available a line of banking products tailored to their needs, with those services delivered by experienced professionals concerned with building long-term relationships. Puyallup Valley Bank conducts business out of six full-service offices and one drive-up facility.

On May 16, 2002, Puyallup Valley Bank purchased various tangible and intangible assets of Puget Sound Mortgage Brokers, Inc., a Washington Corporation located in Puyallup Washington. The purchase price was not material to Puyallup Valley Bank or to the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company. The purchase was made to further enhance the Bank’s mortgage banking operations. The mortgage operation will be operated as a division of the Bank using the name Puget Sound Mortgage Brokers and will operate in a leased facility.

Valley Bank

Valley Bank is a Washington state-chartered commercial bank, which commenced operations in January 1999. The Bank provides full-service banking to businesses and residents within the Auburn and Kent communities and its surrounding area. Valley Bank offers commercial banking services to small and medium size businesses, professionals and retail customers in the Bank’s market area. Valley Bank conducts business out of two full-service offices.

On September 5, 2002 Valley Bank opened a new banking facility in Kent Washington. The new office will initially operate in a leased facility until a permanent facility can be located.

Both Puyallup Valley Bank and Valley Bank are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company.

-8-


Table of Contents

During November 2002, the Board of Directors of both Puyallup Valley Bank and Valley Bank entered into an agreement to merge the two banks. It is anticipated the merger will occur during the first quarter of 2003. The banks entered into this agreement for several reasons, including, better customer service, operational efficiency, and cost improvement.

Results of Operations

The Company earned net income of $503,000 or $0.44 per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to net income of $526,000 or $0.46 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2001, an decrease of 4.4 percent. The Company’s return on average assets was 1.19 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared to 1.30 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2001.

The Company earned net income of $1,562,000 or $1.37 per diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to net income of $1,269,000 or $1.10 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of 23.1 percent. The Company’s return on average assets was 1.29 percent for the nine months ended September 30,2002, compared to 1.10 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

The decrease in net income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2002 was primarily the result of lower noninterest income, higher provisions for loan losses and increased noninterest expense, partially offset by increased net interest income. The increase in net income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 was primarily the result of an increase in net interest income, offset by higher provisions for loan losses and increased noninterest expense. A significant decrease in the Company’s cost of funds favorably impact net interest income during both the three-month and nine-month periods. The increased staffing levels of Valley Bank’s new Kent facility and Puget Sound Mortgage Brokers significantly increased salaries and employee benefits during the three-month period.

Because of the new Kent office, management anticipates higher operating costs. Profitability of the Company will be negatively impacted until the new office generates sufficient revenue to offset the added operating costs. It is anticipated the new office will not breakeven until its third year of operation. The Company further anticipates the Kent office will lose up to $250,000 during the three-year period.

The Company’s net income is derived principally from the operating results of its banking subsidiaries, namely Puyallup Valley Bank and Valley Bank. Puyallup Valley Bank is a well-established commercial bank and generates the majority of the Company’s operating income.

Puyallup Valley Bank earned net income of $541,000 and $1,541,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $476,000 and $1,237,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001. Puyallup Valley Bank’s increase in earnings resulted from an increase in net interest income, partially offset by lower non-interest income, an increase in the provision for loan losses and by an increase in the provision for income tax.

Valley Bank incurred a loss of $14,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and earned net income of $46,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to net income of $36,000 and $34,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001. Valley Bank’s earnings were negatively impacted by the costs of the new Kent facility discussed above.

-9-


Table of Contents

The following table shows the various performance ratios for the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively:

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Selected Financial Data 1
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                   
      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30,   September 30,
     
 
      2002   2001   2002   2001
     
 
 
 
Financial Performance
                               
 
Net Income
  $ 503     $ 526     $ 1,562     $ 1,269  
 
Average Assets
    168,391       160,707       162,316       154,430  
 
Average Stockholders’ Equity
    22,145       20,807       21,563       20,365  
 
Return on Assets (net income divided by average assets)
    1.19 %     1.30 %     1.29 %     1.10 %
 
Return on Equity (net income divided by average equity)
    9.01 %     10.03 %     9.69 %     8.33 %
 
Net Interest Margin (net interest income (tax adjusted) Divided by earning assets)
    5.34 %     4.94 %     5.41 %     4.97 %
 
Efficiency Ratio (noninterest expense divided by noninterest income plus net interest income)
    63.11 %     63.91 %     62.63 %     68.40 %
 
Ratio of noninterest income to average assets
    3.37 %     3.26 %     3.42 %     3.47 %

Net Interest Income

The component contributing most significantly to the Company’s net income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned on earning assets (primarily loans and investments) and interest paid on interest bearing liabilities (deposits and borrowings). The volume of and yields earned on earning assets and the volume of and the rates paid on interest bearing liabilities determine net interest income. Interest earned and interest paid is also affected by general economic conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, and by government policies and the action of regulatory authorities. Net interest income, with tax-exempt income adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis, divided by average earning assets is referred to as net interest margin. For the three months ended September 30, 2002 the Company’s net interest margin was 5.34 percent compared to 4.94 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2001. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002 the Company’s net interest margin was 5.41 percent compared to 4.97 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

Interest income was $2,533,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $2,672,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Interest income was $7,413,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $7,977,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001. The three-month and nine month decrease was primarily the result of a significant decrease in the yield earned on earning assets. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 6.53 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 7.22 percent during the same period a year ago. The yield on interest-earning assets decreased to 6.70 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 7.58 percent during the same period a year ago. The decrease in interest income was primarily the result of a lower yield realized on interest bearing deposits with banks, investment securities, and loans. The yield decrease reflects an overall decline in market interest rates resulting from a soft economic environment.

Interest expense was $469,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $857,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Interest expense was $1,448,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $2,780,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The cost of funds decreased to 1.60 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 3.01 percent during the same period a year ago. The cost of funds decreased to 1.73 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 3.45 percent during the same period a year ago. The decrease for both the three-month and nine month periods was due to a decrease in the Company’s cost of funds resulting from an overall decline in market interest rates.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, market interest rates continue to be at historical lows as a result of a slow national and regional economy and because of an aggressively accommodating Federal Reserve monetary policy. During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002, net interest margin increased as a result of cost of funds decreasing faster than interest earned on interest earning assets. The cost of funds decrease resulted from certificates of deposit having shorter maturities than interest earning assets. In addition, the Company lowered the interest rate on deposits with administrated rates such as NOW, savings, and money market accounts. In


1    The computation of the ratios is based on the recorded assets and liabilities after the effect of changes in market values of securities available for sale.

-10-


Table of Contents

periods of increasing interest rates, the Company’s net interest income and margin may decrease because the Company has a significant amount of interest bearing liabilities subject to repricing when compared to interest earning assets. This maybe somewhat offset because the rate paid on deposits with administered interest rates generally do not increase as rapidly as an account whose rates change with market interest rates.

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s average balance and average interest rates earned or paid, interest rate spread and net interest margin:

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES EARNED/PAID
(dollars in thousands)
                                                     
        For the Three Months Ended September 30,
       
        2002   2001
       
 
        Average   Revenue/   Yield/   Average   Revenue/   Yield/
        Balance   Expense   Rate   Balance   Expense   Rate
       
 
 
 
 
 
ASSETS
                                               
Interest-earning assets
                                               
 
Loans (including fees) 1
  $ 110,616     $ 2,081       7.46 %   $ 97,747     $ 2,042       8.29 %
 
Investment securities 2 3
    32,215       404       4.97 %     31,680       468       5.86 %
 
Interest bearing deposits with banks
    12,175       76       2.48 %     18,933       192       4.02 %
 
Federal funds sold
    835       3       1.41 %                        
 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
    491       8       6.46 %     462       8       6.87 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total Interest-earning assets
    156,332       2,572       6.53 %     148,822       2,710       7.22 %
 
Total noninterest-earning assets
    12,059                       11,885                  
 
   
                     
                 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 168,391                     $ 160,707                  
 
   
                     
                 
Interest-bearing liabilities
                                               
 
Deposits
  $ 115,627       467       1.60 %   $ 112,531       854       3.01 %
 
Other borrowed funds
    496       2       1.60 %     423       3       2.81 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total Interest-bearing liabilities
    116,123       469       1.60 %     112,954       857       3.01 %
 
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
    30,123                       26,946                  
 
Stockholders’ equity
    22,145                       20,807                  
 
   
                     
                 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 168,391                     $ 160,707                  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net interest spread
          $ 2,103       4.93 %           $ 1,853       4.21 %
 
           
                     
         
Margin Analysis
                                               
 
Interest income/earning assets
          $ 2,572       6.53 %           $ 2,710       7.22 %
 
Interest expense/earning assets
            469       1.19 %             857       2.28 %
 
           
     
             
     
 
 
Net interest margin
          $ 2,103       5.34 %           $ 1,853       4.94 %
 
           
                     
         


1    Average loan balance includes nonaccrual loans, if any. Interest income on nonaccrual loans has been included.
2    Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using an incremental rate of 34%.
3    The yield on investment securities is calculated using historical cost basis.

-11-


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s average balance and average interest rates earned or paid, interest rate spread and net interest margin:

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES EARNED/PAID
(dollars in thousands)
                                                     
        For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
       
        2002   2001
       
 
        Average   Revenue/   Yield/   Average   Revenue/   Yield/
        Balance   Expense   Rate   Balance   Expense   Rate
       
 
 
 
 
 
ASSETS
                                               
Interest-earning assets
                                               
 
Loans (including fees) 1
  $ 105,546     $ 6,027       7.63 %   $ 96,030     $ 6,116       8.52 %
 
Investment securities 2 3
    32,363       1,247       5.15 %     29,228       1,316       6.02 %
 
Interest bearing deposits with banks
    11,559       230       2.66 %     16,742       619       4.94 %
 
Federal funds sold
    282       3       1.42 %                        
 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
    485       22       6.06 %     455       23       6.67 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total Interest-earning assets
    150,235       7,529       6.70 %                     7.58 %
 
Total noninterest-earning assets
    12,081                       11,975                  
 
   
                     
                 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 162,316                     $ 154,430                  
 
   
                     
                 
Interest-bearing liabilities
                                               
 
Deposits
  $ 111,786       1,443       1.73 %   $ 107,419       2,768       3.45 %
 
Other borrowed funds
    423       5       1.58 %     393       12       4.08 %
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total Interest-bearing liabilities
    112,209       1,448       1.73 %     107,812       2,780       3.45 %
 
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
    28,544                       26,253                  
 
Stockholders’ equity
    21,563                       20,365                  
 
   
                     
                 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  $ 162,316                     $ 154,430                  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net interest spread
          $ 6,081       4.97 %           $ 5,294       4.13 %
 
           
                     
         
Margin Analysis
                                               
 
Interest income/earning assets
          $ 7,529       6.70 %           $ 8,074       7.58 %
 
Interest expense/earning assets
            1,448       1.29 %             2,780       2.61 %
 
           
     
             
     
 
 
Net interest margin
          $ 6,081       5.41 %           $ 5,294       4.97 %
 
           
                     
         


1    Average loan balance includes nonaccrual loans, if any. Interest income on nonaccrual loans has been included.
2    Tax-exempt income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis using an incremental rate of 34%.
3    The yield on investment securities is calculated using historical cost basis.

-12-


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s change in net interest income for the periods that are attributable to changes in interest rate and changes in volume for the three month period ended September 30, 2002 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2001 and for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2001:

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Volume/Rate Analysis
1 — For the Three Months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)

                             
        2002 Compared to 2001
       
        Volume   Rate   Net
       
 
 
Interest income
                       
 
Loans (including fees) 2
  $ 254     $ (215 )   $ 39  
 
Investment securities 3
    8       (72 )     (64 )
 
Interest bearing deposits with banks
    (56 )     (60 )     (116 )
 
Federal funds sold
    3               3  
 
   
     
     
 
   
Total Interest-earning assets
    209       (347 )     (138 )
Interest-bearing liabilities
                       
 
Total deposits
    23       (410 )     (387 )
 
Other borrowed funds
            (1 )     (1 )
 
   
     
     
 
   
Total Interest-bearing liabilities
    23       (411 )     (388 )
 
   
     
     
 
   
Net interest income
  $ 186     $ 64     $ 250  
 
   
     
     
 

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Volume/Rate Analysis
1 — For the Nine Months ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands)

                             
        2002 Compared to 2001
       
        Volume   Rate   Net
       
 
 
Interest income
                       
 
Loans (including fees) 2
  $ 575     $ (664 )   $ (89 )
 
Investment securities 3
    132       (201 )     (69 )
 
Interest bearing deposits with banks
    (156 )     (233 )     (389 )
 
Federal funds sold
    3               3  
 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock dividend
    1       (2 )     (1 )
 
   
     
     
 
   
Total Interest-earning assets
    555       (1,100 )     (545 )
Interest-bearing liabilities
                       
 
Total deposits
    108       (1,433 )     (1,325 )
 
Other borrowed funds
    1       (8 )     (7 )
 
   
     
     
 
   
Total Interest-bearing liabilities
    109       (1,441 )     (1,332 )
 
   
     
     
 
   
Net interest income
  $ 446     $ 341     $ 787  
 
   
     
     
 


1    The change in interest due to both volume and yield/rate has been allocated to change due to volume and change due to yield/rate in proportion to the absolute value of the change in each.
2    Balances of nonaccrual loans, if any, and related income recognized have been included for computational purposes.
3    Tax-exempt income has been converted to a tax-equivalent basis using an incremental rate of 34%.

-13-


Table of Contents

Provision for loan losses

Provisions for loan losses reduce net interest income. The Company provided $76,000 for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $0 during the same three-month period last year. The Company provided $167,000 for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $62,000 during the same nine-month period last year. The provision was made as a result of increasing loans.

Management believes the amount of the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to absorb losses in the current portfolio. This statement is based upon management’s continuing evaluation of inherent risks in the current loan portfolio, current levels of classified assets, and economic factors. The Company will continue to monitor the allowance and make future adjustments to the allowance as conditions dictate. For further discussion regarding the allowance for loan losses, see the discussion on allowance for loan losses under Risk Elements.

Noninterest income and expense

Net income is also affected by noninterest income (primarily service charges, and other operating income) and noninterest expenses (primarily salaries and employee benefits, occupancy, equipment, and other operating expenses).

Noninterest income was $202,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002, a 19.8 percent decrease from $252,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Noninterest income was $661,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, a slight decrease from $664,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease in noninterest income for the three month period ended September 30, 2002 was the result of lower other operating income and lower security gains partially offset by higher service charges on deposit accounts and increase loan origination fees on mortgage loans brokered. A $34,000 loss resulting from the write down of various fixed assets discarded during the Company’s main office remodel was included in other operating expenses. The decrease in noninterest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 was the result of a decrease in other operating income discussed above partially offset by higher service charges on deposit accounts.

Noninterest expense was $1,430,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002, an 8.3 percent increase from $1,321,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Noninterest expense was $4,150,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, a 3.5 percent increase from $4,009,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The increase in noninterest expense for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2002 was the result of increased salaries and employee benefits and other operating expenses partially offset by lower occupancy and equipment expenses. Salary and employee benefits increased as a result of the opening of the new Kent facility and the operation of Puget Sound Mortgage Brokers. Occupancy and equipment expense decreased as a result of lower depreciation expense. Occupancy and equipment expense is expected to increase when the Company completes its main office remodel during the fourth quarter of 2002. The percentage of noninterest expense to average assets was 3.42 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to 3.47 percent during the same period last year.

The Company’s efficiency ratio, which is the ratio of noninterest expense to net interest income plus noninterest income, was 63.1 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 63.9 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2001. The Company’s efficiency ratio was 62.6 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 68.4 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease in the ratio was primarily due to a significant improvement in net interest income, partially offset by a decrease in noninterest income and an increase in noninterest expense.

Provision for income tax

The Company’s provision for income tax is a significant reduction of operating income. The provision for the three months September 30, 2002, was $257,000 compared to $220,000 for the three month ended September 30, 2001. The provision for the nine months September 30, 2002, was $747,000 compared to $521,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The provision represents an effective tax rate of approximately 32 percent during 2002 and 29 percent during 2001. The Company’s marginal tax rate is currently 34 percent. The difference between the Company’s effective and marginal tax rate is primarily related to investments made in tax-exempt securities. Last years’ effective rate was lower than the current year rate primarily as a result of a higher than anticipated year 2000 tax refund.

-14-


Table of Contents

Financial Condition

The Company’s total consolidated assets were $171.0 million as of September 30, 2002, compared to $157.2 million as of December 31, 2001. The 8.8 percent increase in assets was primarily in investment securities, federal funds sold, and loans, funded by increasing deposits and a decrease in interest bearing deposits with banks. Stockholders’ equity increased as a result of earnings during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 and an increase in other comprehensive income, partially offset by dividends paid.

Investment Portfolio

The major classifications of investments at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, are summarized in Note 3 — Investment Securities in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

At September 30, 2002, the Company had $33.2 million of securities available-for-sale, compared to $31.4 million as of December 31, 2001. Although investment securities increased by $1.8 million during 2002, the Company purchased approximately $12.8 million in securities this year. They were funded primarily with $11.3 million of securities either maturing or sold during 2002 along with a decrease in interest bearing deposits with banks. The result was a change in the mix of the investment portfolio favoring mortgage-backed securities and securities issued by state and political subdivisions rather than the U.S. Government, corporations, and agencies.

At September 30, 2002, all of the Company’s securities were classified as available-for-sale. Management believes that that holding securities as available-for-sale provides greater flexibility to respond to interest rate changes and liquidity needs to fund loan growth.

Loan Portfolio

The major classifications of loans at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, are summarized in Note 4 — Loans in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In addition to the major classifications of loans summarized in Note 4, the Company has additional loan concentrations exceeding 10 percent of total loans at September 30, 2002. They include loans to medical doctors and dentists in the amount of approximately $20.4 million.

Loans were $111.7 million as of September 30, 2002, compared to $100.8 million as of December 31, 2001. The increase was primarily in real estate construction, real estate mortgage, and commercial loans partially offset by a decrease in commercial real estate loans. The percentage of loans to total assets was 65.3 percent and 64.1 percent at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. It continues to be management’s intent to grow the loan portfolio and to increase the percent of loans to assets, which potentially could improve the Company’s net interest margin.

Risk Elements

The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s non-performing assets as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Non-performing Assets

                       
        September 30,   December 31,
        2002   2001
       
 
Non-performing assets:
               
 
Nonaccrual loans
  $ 18     $ 129  
 
Loans 90 days or more past due
               
 
Restructured loans
            909  
 
   
     
 
 
    18       1,038  
 
Other real estate owned
               
 
   
     
 
   
Total non-performing assets
  $ 18     $ 1,038  
 
   
     
 

-15-


Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2002, the Company had $18,000 in nonperforming assets, which include nonaccrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest, and restructured loans. The Company had $1,038,000 in nonperforming assets as of December 31, 2001. The $909,000 restructured loan, at December 31, 2001, was repaid during the first three months of 2002.

The accrual of interest on nonaccrual and other impaired loans is discontinued at 90 days or when, in the opinion of management, the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received. Interest income on restructured loans is recognized pursuant to the terms of the new loan agreement. Interest income on other impaired loans is monitored and based upon the terms of the underlying loan agreement. However, the recorded net investment in impaired loans, including accrued interest, is limited to the present value of the expected cash flows of the impaired loan or the observable fair market value of the loan’s collateral.

During the three-month and nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 there was one commercial loan on nonaccrual status. The gross income that would have been recorded for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 if the nonaccrual loan had been current and in accordance with its original term approximates $3,000. Interest recognized on the loan for the year was insignificant. The Company does not anticipate any loss with respect to this credit.

During the three-month and nine-month period ended September 30, 2001 there was one commercial loan on nonaccrual status. The gross income that would have been recorded for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2001 if the nonaccrual loan had been current and in accordance with its original term approximates $5,000 and $10,000, respectively. Interest recognized on the loan for the year was insignificant.

Potential Problem Loans

At September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company had two potential problem commercial real estate loans totaling approximately $2,378,000. The Company believes that the loans are secured by sufficient collateral to repay the loans, although there can be no assurances given with respect to potential losses in these credits. These loans are in addition to those categorized as non-performing listed above. Although these loans are currently classified as performing, management has information regarding credit weakness inherent in the loans, which may result in the borrowers’ inability to comply with present loan repayment terms.

Summary of Loan Loss Experience

Changes in the Allowance for Loan Losses

The activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized in Note 5 - Allowance for Loan Losses in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The allowance for loan losses is increased by charges to income and decreased by charge-offs (net of recoveries), and established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for credit losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb losses inherent in existing loans, commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit based on evaluations of collectibility and prior loss experience of loans, commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, loan concentrations, specific problem loans, commitments, standby letters of credit and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers’ ability to pay.

The majority of the Company’s loan portfolio consists of commercial loans and single-family residential loans secured by real estate in the Puyallup and Pierce County areas and also in the Auburn and King County areas. Real estate prices in this market are stable at this time but may weaken as a result of a slowing local and national economy. Therefore, the ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of the Company’s loan portfolio may be susceptible to change as local market conditions change in the future.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, further reductions in the carrying amounts of loans may be necessary based on changes in local economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an

-16-


Table of Contents

integral part of their examination process, periodically review the estimated losses on loans. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additional losses based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examination.

The following table sets forth other information regarding the allowance for loan losses for the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Loan Loss Experience

                                 
    Analysis of the Allowance   Analysis of the Allowance
    for Loan Losses   for Loan Losses
    Three months ended   Nine months ended
   
 
    September 30,   September 30,   September 30,   September 30,
    2002   2001   2002   2001
   
 
 
 
Average Allowance for Loan Losses
  $ 1,278     $ 1,164     $ 1,216     $ 1,168  
Average Loans Outstanding
  $ 110,616     $ 97,747     $ 105,546     $ 96,030  
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding
    0.01 %     0.00 %     0.01 %     0.00 %
Ratio of average allowance for loan losses to average loans outstanding
    1.16 %     1.19 %     1.15 %     1.22 %

There were $5,000 in loan charge-offs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001. The charge-off was in the Company’s consumer loan portfolio. The ratio of the average allowance for loan losses to average loans outstanding totaled 1.16 percent and 1.15 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to 1.19 percent and 1.22 percent during the same periods last year, respectively. The decrease results from the loan portfolio increasing faster than the allowance for loan losses during both the three and nine month periods. At September 30, 2002, the allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans totaled 1.18 percent compared to 1.15 percent at December 31, 2001.

Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate by management to provide for loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on management’s assessment of various factors affecting the loan portfolio, including, local economic conditions, growth of the loan portfolio and its composition. Non-performing loans and net charge-offs during the periods presented have been minimal demonstrating strong credit quality. Increases in the allowance for loan losses made though provisions were primarily a result of loan growth.

Management determines the amount of the allowance for loan losses by utilizing a loan grading system to determine risk in the loan portfolio and by considering the results of credit reviews. The loan portfolio is separated by quality and then by loan type. Loans of acceptable quality are evaluated as a group, by loan type, with a specific loss rate assigned to the total loans in each type, but unallocated to any individual loan. Conversely, each adversely classified loan is individually analyzed, to determine an estimated loss amount. A valuation allowance is also assigned to these adversely classified loans, but at a higher loss rate due to the greater risk of loss. For those loans where the estimated loss is greater than the background percentage, the estimated loss amount is considered specifically allocated to the allowance. Although management has allocated a portion of the allowance to the loan categories using the method described above, the adequacy of the allowance must be considered as a whole. To mitigate the imprecision in most estimates of expected loan losses, the allocated component of the allowance is supplemented by an unallocated component. The unallocated portion includes management’s judgmental determination of the amounts necessary for qualitative factors such as the consideration of new products and policies, economic conditions, concentrations of credit risk, and the experience and abilities of lending personnel. Loan concentrations, quality, terms and basic underlying assumptions remained substantially unchanged during the period.

The Company uses the historical loss experience method in conjunction with the specific identification method for calculation of the amount of allowance for loan losses. A nine-year average historical loan loss rate is calculated. This experience loss rate is applied to graded loans that are not adversely classified for a subtotal of needed allowance.

-17-


Table of Contents

Loans adversely classified are analyzed for potential loss on an individual basis. This subtotal is added to the experience subtotal and the total is compared to the allowance for loan losses.

The Company also evaluates current conditions and may adjust the historical loss estimate by qualitative factors that effect loan repayment. These factors may include levels of, and trends in, delinquencies and non-accruals; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of any changes in lending policies; experience, ability and depth of management and lending staff; national and local economic trends; concentrations of credit; and any legal and regulatory requirements.

Deposits

The Company’s primary source of funds is customer deposits. The Company attempts to maintain a high percentage of noninterest-bearing deposits, which are a low cost funding source. In addition, the Company offers a variety of interest-bearing accounts designed to attract both short-term and longer-term deposits from customers. Interest-bearing accounts earn interest at rates established by management based on competitive market factors and the Company’s need for funds. The Company traditionally has not purchased brokered deposits and does not intend to do so in the future.

Deposits increased to $146.3 million as of September 30, 2002, compared to $134.7 million as of December 31, 2001. The increase occurred in all categories of deposits during the nine-month period.

The following table sets forth the balances for each major category of deposit by amount and percent during the periods indicated:

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Deposits
(dollars in thousands)

                                 
    Period ended,
   
    September 30, 2002   December 31, 2001
   
 
    Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent
   
 
 
 
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
  $ 29,391       20.1 %   $ 24,770       18.4 %
Interest bearing demand deposits
    20,694       14.1 %     18,997       14.1 %
Money market deposits
    37,141       25.4 %     36,424       27.0 %
Savings deposits
    14,004       9.6 %     11,987       8.9 %
Time certificates < $100,000
    25,998       17.8 %     24,097       17.9 %
Time certificates > $100,000
    19,041       13.0 %     18,425       13.7 %
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
  $ 146,269       100.0 %   $ 134,700       100.0 %
 
   
     
     
     
 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Management actively analyzes and manages the Company’s liquidity position. The objective of liquidity management is to ensure the availability of sufficient cash flows to meet all financial commitments and to capitalize on opportunities for profitable business expansion. Management believes that the Company’s cash flow will be sufficient to support its existing operations for the foreseeable future.

Cash flows from operations contribute significantly to liquidity as well as proceeds from maturities of securities and increasing customer deposits. As indicated on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, net cash from operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 contributed $2.5 million to liquidity compared to $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The majority of the Company’s funding comes from customer deposits within its operating region. Customer deposits provided $11.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to $14.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, non-interest bearing deposits, savings deposits, and certificates of deposit provided the majority of the deposit growth. Another important source of liquidity is investments in federal funds and interest-bearing deposits with banks and the Company’s securities portfolio. The Company maintains a ladder of securities that provides prepayments and payments at maturity and a portfolio of available-for-sale securities that could be converted to cash quickly. Proceeds from maturity and sale of securities provided $11.3 million for the nine months September 30, 2002 compared to $15.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

-18-


Table of Contents

At September 30, 2002, the Company held cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits with banks, and federal funds sold of approximately $19.5 million. In addition, at such date $33.2 million of the Company’s investments were classified as available for sale.

The Banks have capacity to borrow funds, up to ten percent of assets, from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLB”) through pre-approved credit lines as a secondary source of liquidity. However, these credit lines have pledge requirements whereby the Banks must maintain unencumbered collateral with a value at least equal to the outstanding balance. In addition to the FHLB credit line, the Banks have committed line of credit agreements totaling approximately $7.5 million from unaffiliated banks. At September 30, 2002, the Banks had no advances outstanding to the FHLB or from unaffiliated banks.

The Bank’s have commitments to extend credit, which may have a impact on the Company’s liquidity position. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates. Since some commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not represent future cash requirements. The Company experience suggests customers draw on approximately 75 percent of loan commitments. Commitments to extend credit at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 were $18.5 and $13.5 million, respectively.

Other commitments include agreements between Puyallup Valley Bank and several contractors for the remodel of its main office facility in Puyallup. It is anticipated the remodel project will be completed during the fourth quarter of 2002 and at a cost of approximately $555,000.

The Company’s total stockholders’ equity increased to $22.4 million at September 30, 2002 from $21.2 million at December 31, 2001. The increase was the result of higher unrealized gains recorded on securities available for sale, net of income tax and by net income earned during the nine months ended September 30, 2002, partially offset by a $.60 dividend per share paid to stockholders of record on December 31, 2001. At September 30, 2002, stockholders’ equity was 13.1 percent of total assets, compared to 13.5 percent at December 31, 2001.

The market value of available for sale securities was greater than book value at both September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, primarily as a result of low market interest rates, which resulted in unrealized gains in the investment portfolio. In the event market interest rates increase, the market value of the Company’s investment portfolio may decrease. Because changes in the market value of available-for-sale securities are a component of other comprehensive income, within stockholders’ equity, a decrease in market value of securities would negatively impact stockholders’ equity. At September 30, 2002, the Company performed a simulation analysis of changes in the market value of the investment portfolio given a 300 basis point increase in interest rates. The analysis indicated a decrease in market value of approximately $905,000 net of federal income tax. Although stockholder’s equity would be reduced by approximately 4 percent, the Company would still be well in excess on capital adequacy requirements in the event the Company would be required to liquidate these securities for unforeseen liquidity needs.

Capital Adequacy Requirements

The Federal Reserve and the FDIC have adopted risk-based capital guidelines for banks and bank holding companies that are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies and account for off-balance sheet items. The guidelines are minimums, and the federal regulators have noted that banks and bank holding companies contemplating significant expansion programs should not allow expansion to diminish their capital ratios and should maintain ratios in excess of the minimums. Failure to achieve and maintain adequate capital levels may give rise to supervisory action through the issuance of a capital directive to ensure the maintenance of required capital levels.

The current guidelines require all federally-regulated banks to maintain a minimum risk-based total capital ratio equal to 8%, of which at least 4% must be Tier 1 capital. Tier 1 capital includes common shareholders’ equity, qualifying perpetual preferred stock, and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, but excludes goodwill and most other intangibles and the allowance for loan and lease losses. Tier 2 capital includes the excess of any preferred stock not included in Tier 1 capital, mandatory convertible securities, hybrid capital instruments, subordinated debt and intermediate term-preferred stock, 20% of unrealized gain of equity securities, and general reserves for loan and lease losses up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Neither of the Banks has received any notice indicating that it will be subject to higher capital requirements.

-19-


Table of Contents

Under these guidelines, banks’ assets are given risk-weights of 0%, 20%, 50% or 100%. Most loans are assigned to the 100% risk category, except for first mortgage loans fully secured by residential property and, under certain circumstances, residential construction loans (both carry a 50% rating). Most investment securities are assigned to the 20% category, except for municipal or state revenue bonds (which have a 50% rating) and direct obligations of or obligations guaranteed by the United States Treasury or United States Government Agencies (which have a 0% rating). The Agencies have also implemented a leverage ratio, which is equal to Tier 1 capital as a percentage of average total assets less intangibles, to be used as a supplement to the risk-based guidelines. The principal objective of the leverage ratio is to limit the maximum degree to which a bank may leverage its equity capital base. The minimum required leverage ratio for top-rated institutions is 3%, but most institutions are required to maintain an additional cushion of at least 100 to 200 basis points. Any institution operating at or near the 3% level is expected to be a strong banking organization without any supervisory, financial or operational weaknesses or deficiencies. Any institutions experiencing or anticipating significant growth would be expected to maintain capital ratios, including tangible capital positions, well above the minimum levels.

The capital levels of the Company currently exceed applicable regulatory guidelines, and the Banks’ are qualified as “well-capitalized” at September 30, 2002. Management believes that under the current regulations the Banks will continue to meet well-capitalized capital requirements in the foreseeable future. However, events beyond the control of the Banks such as a downturn in the economy where the Banks have most of their loans, could adversely affect future earnings and, consequently, the ability of the Banks to meet future well-capitalized capital requirements.

The capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Banks as of September 30, 2002, are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):

VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
Capital
                                                           
                                              To Be Well
                                              Capitalized Under
                          For Capital       Prompt Corrective
      Actual       Adequacy Purposes       Action Provisions
     
     
     
As September 30, 2002   Amount   Ratio       Amount   Ratio       Amount   Ratio
 
 
     
 
     
 
Total Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets)
                                                       
 
Consolidated
  $ 22,938       18.3 %     > $ 10,037       8.0 %     > $ 12,546       10.0 %
 
Puyallup Valley Bank
  $ 15,571       14.5 %     > $ 8,614       8.0 %     > $ 10,768       10.0 %
 
Valley Bank
  $ 4,107       25.9 %     > $ 1,267       8.0 %     > $ 1,584       10.0 %
Tier I Capital
(to Risk-Weighted Assets)
                                                       
 
Consolidated
  $ 21,618       17.2 %     > $ 5,018       4.0 %     > $ 7,527       6.0 %
 
Puyallup Valley Bank
  $ 14,449       13.4 %     > $ 4,307       4.0 %     > $ 6,461       6.0 %
 
Valley Bank
  $ 3,909       24.7 %     > $ 633       4.0 %     > $ 950       6.0 %
Tier I Capital
(to Average Assets)
                                                       
 
Consolidated
  $ 21,618       12.8 %     > $ 6,731       4.0 %     > $ 8,413       5.0 %
 
Puyallup Valley Bank
  $ 14,449       9.7 %     > $ 5,958       4.0 %     > $ 7,448       5.0 %
 
Valley Bank
  $ 3,909       22.6 %     > $ 693       4.0 %     > $ 867       5.0 %

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company’s results of operation are dependent upon its ability to manage interest rate risk. Management considers interest rate risk to be a significant risk that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The Company does not currently use derivatives to manage market and interest rate risk.

A number of measures are used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, including income simulations and interest sensitivity (gap) analyses. An income simulation model is the primary tool used to assess the direction and magnitude of changes in net interest income resulting from changes in interest rates. Key assumptions in the model include repayment speeds on certain assets, cash flows and maturities of other investment securities, loan and deposit volumes and pricing. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or precisely predict the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income.

-20-


Table of Contents

Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes and changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors. At September 30, 2002, based on the measures used to monitor and manage interest rate risk, there has not been a material change in the Company’s interest rate risk since December 31, 2001. For additional information, refer to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Section 13(a)-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Company’s senior management within the 90-day period preceding the filing date of this quarterly report. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as currently in effect are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

(b)  Changes in Internal Controls: In the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the Company did not make any significant changes in, nor take any corrective actions regarding, its internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect these controls.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements about the future operations of the Company. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following factors: competitive pressure in the banking industry significantly increasing; changes in the interest rate environment reducing margins; general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, are less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality and an increase in the provision for possible loan losses; changes in the regulatory environment; loan delinquency rates; changes in business conditions; volatility of rate sensitive deposits; operational risks including data processing system failures or fraud; asset/liability matching risks and liquidity risks; and changes in the securities markets. Because of these uncertainties, actual future results may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, the Company’s past results do not necessarily indicate its future results.

-21-


Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company faces ordinary routine litigation arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, liabilities (if any) arising from such claims will not have a material adverse effect upon the business, results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

Item 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

     Not applicable

Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

     Not applicable

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     Not applicable.

Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION

During November 2002, the Board of Directors of both Puyallup Valley Bank and Valley Bank entered into an agreement to merge the two banks. It is anticipated the merger will occur during the first quarter of 2003.

Item 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

        (a)    Exhibits

                3.1    Articles of Incorporation of Valley Community Bancshares, Inc. *
 
        3.2    Restated Bylaws of Valley Community Bancshares, Inc. ^
 
        10.    Material contracts of Valley Community Bancshares, Inc.

                        10.1    Severance agreement for Mr. Brown *
 
        10.2    Severance agreement for Mr. Thompson *
 
        10.3    Severance agreement for Mr. Riordan *
 
        10.4    Severance agreement for Mr. Pickett *
 
        10.5    Deferred Compensation Agreement for Mr. Brown *
 
        10.6    Deferred Compensation Agreement for Mr. Thompson #
 
        10.7    1998 Stock Option Plan *
 
        10.8    401(k) Defined Contribution Plan and Noncontributory Profit Sharing Plan Adoption Agreement *

                99.    Additional Exhibits

                        99.1    Certification Of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
        99.2    Certification Of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


*   Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits set forth on Registrant’s Amended Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2000.
#   Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits set forth on Registrant’s 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2001.
  Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits set forth on Registrant’s June 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2002.

-22-


Table of Contents

        (b)    Reports on Form 8-K
 
             Valley Community Bancshares, Inc. filed no report on Form 8-K during the three months ending September 30, 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
             
    VALLEY COMMUNITY BANCSHARES, INC.
(Registrant)
             
             
Date:    November 1, 2002   By   /s/   David H. Brown
       
            David H. Brown
President and Chief Executive Officer
             
             
Date:    November 1, 2002   By   /s/   Joseph E. Riordan
       
            Joseph E. Riordan
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

-23-


Table of Contents

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David H. Brown, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Valley Community Bancshares, Inc.;
 
2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

        a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
        b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
        c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
        b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 31, 2002
             
    By   /s/   David H. Brown
       
            David H. Brown
President and Chief Executive Officer

-24-


Table of Contents

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph E. Riordan, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Valley Community Bancshares, Inc.;
 
2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

        a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
        b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
        c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
        b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 31, 2002
             
    By   /s/   Joseph E. Riordan
       
            Joseph E. Riordan
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

-25-