Back to GetFilings.com
1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|X| Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (Fee required)
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996
|_| Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (No fee required)
For the transition period from_________________ to _________________
Commission file number 333-12381
-----------------------------------
METROPOLITAN FINANCIAL CORP.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Ohio 34-1109469
- ------------------------------- --------------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)
6001 Landerhaven Drive Mayfield Heights, Ohio 44124
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(216) 646-1111
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:
Common Stock,without par value
------------------------------------------
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No
----- ------
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, will not be contained, to the
registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.[ ]
The aggregated market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the
Registrant as of March 3, 1997 was $ 7,608,850.
As of March 3, 1997, there were 3,525,635 shares of the Registrant's Common
Stock issued and outstanding.
Documents incorporated by reference:
Portions of the 1996 Annual Report - Part II
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting - Part III
1
2
METROPOLITAN FINANCIAL CORP.
1996 FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.................................................................. 3
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES................................................................ 32
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS......................................................... 32
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY-HOLDERS....................... 33
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS....................................................... 33
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA................................................... 33
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS................................................. 33
PART III
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA................................ 33
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES...................................................... 33
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT......................... 34
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION..................................................... 34
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT............. 34
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS............................. 34
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K .......... 34
2
3
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL
Metropolitan Financial Corp. ("Metropolitan" or the "Corporation") is a
savings and loan holding company incorporated in 1972 that is engaged in the
principal business of originating and purchasing mortgage and other loans
through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Metropolitan Savings Bank of Cleveland (the
"Bank"). Funds for lending and other investment activities are obtained
primarily from savings deposits, wholesale borrowings, principal repayments on
loans and the sale of loans. The activities of the Corporation are limited and
impact the results of operations primarily through interest expense on a
consolidated basis. Unless otherwise noted, all of the activities discussed
below are of the Bank. Metropolitan's corporate headquarters is located at 6001
Landerhaven Drive, Mayfield Heights, Ohio 44124.
The Corporation's current majority shareholder is Robert M. Kaye of
Rumson, New Jersey. Mr. Kaye acquired the Corporation in 1987 and remained sole
shareholder until the initial public offering ("IPO") of the Corporation's
Common Stock in October, 1996. As a result of the IPO, Mr. Kaye currently owns
77.5% of the Corporation's outstanding Common Stock and has the ability to
control the outcome of various matters submitted to the shareholders for
approval, the ability to elect or remove all the directors of the Corporation
and has ultimate control of the Corporation and the Bank. In addition, Mr. Kaye
is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation.
The Bank is a state chartered savings association established in 1958.
At December 31, 1996, the Bank operated fourteen full service retail offices
throughout Eastern Cuyahoga, Summit, Lake and Geauga Counties. As of December
31, 1996, the Bank also maintained five residential and multifamily loan
production offices. In addition to its principal business of originating and
purchasing mortgage and other loans, the Bank services a significant portfolio
of mortgage loans for various investors. The Bank has recently formed a Trust
Service Department to manage investment assets for individual and institutional
clients.
At December 31, 1996, Metropolitan had total assets of $769.1 million,
total deposits of $622.1 million and shareholders' equity of $30.2 million. The
deposits of the Bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
("FDIC") up to applicable limits.
In addition to the Bank, Metropolitan has four other subsidiaries, each
of which are either directly or indirectly wholly-owned by Metropolitan. These
subsidiaries include: MetroCapital Corporation; Kimberly Construction Company,
Incorporated ("Kimberly Construction"); Metropolitan Savings Service
Corporation; and Metropolitan Securities Corporation. Each of these
subsidiaries, with the exception of Kimberly Construction, is inactive.
Currently, Kimberly Construction's sole business function is to serve as a
principal party to various construction contracts entered into in connection
with the construction of Bank premises.
LENDING ACTIVITIES
General. Metropolitan primarily originates and purchases mortgage loans
secured by multifamily residential real estate. Metropolitan also originates
one- to four-family residential, construction and commercial real estate loans,
and to a lesser extent, consumer and business loans. In order to minimize
interest rate risk, the majority of the residential real estate loans retained
by Metropolitan in its portfolio are adjustable rate mortgages ("ARMs").
3
4
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following information presents the
composition of Metropolitan's loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, in
dollar amounts and in percentages (before deductions for loans in process,
deferred fees and discounts and allowance for losses on loans) as of the dates
indicated.
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993
------------------- --------------------- ------------------- ------------------
Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
------- ------- ------- -------- -------- ------- ------- -------
(Dollars in thousands)
REAL ESTATE LOANS
One- to four-family $114,758 16.8% $ 76,259 15.0% $112,840 25.2% $ 39,510 12.7%
Multifamily 276,544 40.3 231,459 45.8 187,928 41.9 166,221 53.2
Commercial 135,635 19.8 109,403 21.5 83,354 18.6 54,819 17.5
Construction and land 71,697 10.5 48,210 9.5 38,270 8.5 30,894 9.9
Held for sale 8,973 1.3 1,504 0.2 84 0.0 10,391 3.3
-------- ------ -------- ------- -------- ------- -------- -------
Total real estate loans 607,607 88.7 466,835 92.0 422,476 94.2 301,835 96.6
CONSUMER LOANS 54,180 7.9 32,214 6.3 25,946 5.8 10,687 3.4
BUSINESS AND OTHER LOANS 23,508 3.4 8,703 1.7 171 0.0 50 0.0
-------- ------ ------- ------- -------- ------- -------- -------
Total loans 685,295 100.0% 507,752 100.0% 448,593 100.0% 312,572 100.0%
====== ======= ======= =======
LESS:
Loans in process 31,758 23,373 19,338 14,656
Deferred fees, premiums and
discounts, net 2,896 1,764 2,317 1,998
Allowance for losses
on loans 4,175 2,765 1,911 1,239
-------- -------- -------- --------
TOTAL LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET $646,466 $479,850 $425,027 $294,679
======== ======== ======== ========
December 31
---------------------
1992
---------------------
Amount Percent
REAL ESTATE LOANS
One- to four-family $ 36,351 15.3%
Multifamily 129,599 54.7
Commercial 36,717 15.5
Construction and land 24,255 10.2
Held for sale 5,082 2.2
-------- ------
Total real estate loans 232,004 97.9
CONSUMER LOANS 5,022 2.1
BUSINESS AND OTHER LOANS 50 0.0
--------- ------
Total loans 237,076 100.0%
=====
LESS:
Loans in process 11,222
Deferred fees, premiums and
discounts, net 3,359
Allowance for losses
on loans 725
---------
TOTAL LOANS RECEIVABLE, NET $221,770
========
Metropolitan had commitments to originate or purchase loans of $70.7 million and $29.7 million at December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively. In addition, Metropolitan had commitments to sell loans of $2.1 million and $2.0 million and optional commitments to
sell loans of $6.4 million and $458,000 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
4
5
The following table shows the composition of Metropolitan's loan portfolio
including loans held for sale, by fixed and adjustable rate at the dates
indicated.
DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993
-------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- -----------------------
Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent Amount Percent
-------- -------- --------- -------- ----------- ------- ----------- --------
(Dollars in thousands)
FIXED RATE LOANS:
Real estate:
One- to four-family $ 41,436 6.1% $ 35,042 6.9% $ 46,418 10.4% $ 20,448 6.5%
Multifamily 88,529 12.9 71,909 14.2 19,852 4.4 5,281 1.7
Commercial 34,726 5.1 17,615 3.5 7,948 1.8 8,325 2.7
Construction and land 392 0.0 39 0.0
Held for sale 2,531 0.4 1,504 0.3 84 0.0 10,391 3.3
--------- ---- --------- ---- --------- ---- --------- -----
Total fixed rate real
estate loans 167,614 24.5 126,109 24.9 74,302 16.6 44,445 14.2
Consumer 46,725 6.8 32,214 6.3 25,946 5.8 10,687 3.4
Business and other 5,650 0.8 2,744 0.5 20 0.0
--------- ---- -------- ---- --------- ---- --------- ----
Total fixed rate loans 219,989 32.1% 161,067 31.7% 100,268 22.4% 55,132 17.6%
-------- ==== ------- ==== ------- ==== --------- ====
ADJUSTABLE RATE LOANS:
Real estate:
One- to four-family 73,322 10.7% 41,217 8.1% 66,422 14.8% 19,062 6.1%
Multifamily 188,015 27.5 159,550 31.4 168,076 37.5 160,940 51.5
Commercial 100,909 14.7 91,788 18.1 75,406 16.8 46,494 14.9
Construction and land 71,305 10.4 48,171 9.5 38,270 8.5 30,894 9.9
Held for sale 6,442 0.9
-------- ---- --------- ---- --------- ----- ---------- ----
Total adjustable rate real
estate loans 439,993 64.2 340,726 67.1 348,174 77.6 257,390 82.4
Consumer 7,455 1.1
Business and other 17,858 2.6 5,959 1.2 151 0.0 50 0.0
-------- ---- --------- ---- --------- ----- ---------- ----
Total adjustable rate loans 465,306 67.9% 346,685 68.3% 348,325 77.6% 257,440 82.4%
------- ==== -------- ==== -------- ==== --------- ====
LESS:
Loans in process 31,758 23,373 19,338 14,656
Deferred fees, premiums
and discounts, net 2,896 1,764 2,317 1,998
Allowance for losses on loans 4,175 2,765 1,911 1,239
-------- -------- -------- --------
TOTAL LOANS RECEIVABLE,NET $646,466 $479,850 $425,027 $294,679
======= ======= ======= =======
December 31
----------------------
1992
----------------------
Amount Percent
---------- -------
FIXED RATE LOANS:
Real estate:
One- to four-family $ 19,571 8.3%
Multifamily 10,370 4.4
Commercial 8,291 3.5
Construction and land
Held for sale 5,082 2.1
-------- ----
Total fixed rate real
estate loans 43,314 18.3
Consumer 5,022 2.1
Business and other
Total fixed rate loans 48,336 20.4%
-------- ====
ADJUSTABLE RATE LOANS:
Real estate:
One- to four-family 16,780 7.1%
Multifamily 119,229 50.3
Commercial 28,426 12.0
Construction and land 24,255 10.2
Held for sale -------- ----
Total adjustable rate real
estate loans 188,690 79.6
Consumer
Business and other 50 0.0
-------- ----
Total adjustable rate loans 188,740 79.6%
-------- ====
LESS:
Loans in process 11,222
Deferred fees, premiums
and discounts, net 3,359
Allowance for losses on loans 725
--------
TOTAL LOANS RECEIVABLE,NET $221,770
========
5
6
The following table illustrates the interest rate sensitivity of
Metropolitan's loan portfolio, including loans held for sale at December 31,
1996. Loans which have adjustable or renegotiable interest rates are shown as
maturing in the period during which the contract is due. The schedule does not
reflect the effects of possible prepayments, enforcement of due-on-sale clauses,
or the effect of the amortization of premium, discounts, or deferred loan fees.
DUE IN ONE DUE AFTER ONE YEAR DUE AFTER
YEAR OR LESS(1) THROUGH FIVE YEARS FIVE YEARS TOTAL
------------------- ------------------ ---------- -----
WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED WEIGHTED
AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE
AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT RATE AMOUNT RATE
------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Real estate:
One- to Four-family $ 122 6.52% $ 2,099 8.04% $115,100 7.36% $117,321 7.37%
Multifamily 12,616 8.76 62,414 8.95 204,574 8.42 279,604 8.55
Commercial 23,112 9.66 58,311 9.11 57,562 8.97 138,985 9.14
Construction and land 57,346 8.87 14,351 9.53 --- --- 71,697 9.01
Consumer 8,568 12.66 18,109 9.04 27,503 10.28 54,180 10.24
Business 10,911 9.24 3,733 9.57 8,864 9.42 23,508 9.36
------- -------- -------- -------
Total $112,675 9.34% $159,017 9.07% $413,603 8.35% $685,295 8.68%
======== ======== ======== ========
(1) Includes demand loans, loans having no stated maturity and overdraft loans.
The total amount of loans due after December 31, 1997 which have predetermined interest rates is $159.4 million, while
the total amount of loans due after such date which have floating or adjustable rates is $413.3 million.
6
7
LOAN ORIGINATIONS AND PURCHASES
Metropolitan's strategy in recent years has been to increase
interest-earning assets, primarily by increasing the total loan portfolio, as
long as quality assets with the necessary portfolio characteristics were
available. The following table sets forth loan origination, purchase, sale and
repayment activities of Metropolitan for the periods indicated.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
ORIGINATIONS BY TYPE:
ADJUSTABLE RATE:
Real Estate
One- to four-family $ 56,519 $ 22,503 $ 47,136
Multifamily 20,669 24,542 20,588
Commercial 14,667 5,919 8,486
Construction and land 60,566 41,559 44,053
Consumer 10,062 -- --
Business 18,536 6,814 20
-------- -------- --------
Total adjustable rate 181,019 101,337 120,283
-------- -------- --------
FIXED RATE:
Real Estate
One- to four-family 44,795 24,230 37,030
Multifamily 15,759 13,957 8,745
Commercial -- 4,400 3,220
Construction and land 328 37 --
Consumer 17,242 15,048 17,124
Business 4,249 2,915 101
-------- -------- --------
Total fixed rate 82,373 60,587 66,220
-------- -------- --------
Total loans originated 263,392 161,924 186,503
-------- -------- --------
PURCHASES BY TYPE:
ADJUSTABLE RATE:
Real Estate
One- to four-family 1,835 -- 4,939
Multifamily 45,184 3,694 10,129
Commercial 16,905 13,939 23,632
Construction and land -- --
Consumer 5,432 -- --
Business -- -- --
--------- --------- ---------
Total adjustable rate 69,356 17,633 38,700
-------- -------- --------
FIXED RATE:
Real Estate
One- to four-family 1,125 19,381 13,079
Multifamily 22,971 50,420 12,218
Commercial 21,296 15,879 3,904
Construction and land -- -- --
Consumer 12,224 387 6,213
Business -- -- --
--------- --------- --------
Total fixed rate 57,616 86,067 35,414
-------- -------- --------
Total loans purchased 126,972 103,700 74,114
-------- -------- --------
SALES:
Real Estate
One- to four-family (36,392) (35,770) (23,000)
Multifamily (11,539) (27,094) (22,082)
Commercial (7,808) (1,835) (6,285)
-------- -------- --------
Total loan sales (55,739) (64,699) (51,367)
Loans securitized (14,476) (53,795) --
Principal repayments (142,606) (87,972) (73,229)
-------- -------- ---------
Total reductions (212,821) (206,466) (124,596)
-------- -------- ---------
Increase (decrease) in other items, net (10,927) (4,336) (5,673)
-------- -------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) $166,616 $ 54,822 $ 130,348
======== ======== =========
7
8
Multifamily Residential Lending. Metropolitan focuses its primary
portfolio lending efforts on multifamily residential real estate loans.
Multifamily loans are originated by Metropolitan from referrals by present
customers of the Bank and mortgage and real estate brokers. Through its existing
referral network and advertising efforts, Metropolitan has become known for
multifamily lending in its primary multifamily lending markets of Ohio, Northern
Kentucky, Southeastern Michigan, Western Pennsylvania, and Northern and Central
New Jersey. Although Metropolitan operates full service retail sales offices
solely in Northeast Ohio, it has loan origination offices in Southern Ohio,
Western Pennsylvania, and Southeastern Michigan.
At December 31, 1996, Metropolitan's multifamily loans totalled $276.5
million, with an average loan size of approximately $676,000. Of this amount,
$165.2 million or 59.7% were originated by Metropolitan. Currently, Metropolitan
emphasizes the origination of ARMs with principal amounts of less than $2.0
million and maturities of 10 years. The loans are adjustable on a one-, three-
or five-year schedule with an amortization of 25 or 30 years. Rate adjustments
are based on the appropriate term U.S. Treasury securities plus a margin. The
loans are subject to a maximum individual aggregate interest rate adjustment as
well as a maximum aggregate adjustment over the life of the loan (generally 6%).
Due to increasing demand for fixed rate loans, Metropolitan has allocated some
funds for fixed rate programs, typically those with 7 to 10-year maturities. The
maximum loan to value ratio of Metropolitan's multifamily residential loans is
75%.
Metropolitan recognizes that multifamily residential property loans
generally involve a higher degree of risk than the financing of one- to
four-family residential real estate because they typically involve larger loan
balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. The payment
experience on these loans is typically dependent upon the successful operation
of the related real estate project and is subject to certain risks including
excessive vacancy rates or inadequate rental income levels. In order to manage
and reduce these risks, Metropolitan uses strict underwriting standards in its
multifamily residential lending process.
The loans originated in this area are typically less than $2.0 million
in principal amount and are secured by garden-style apartments with generally
under 75 residential units. The underwriting process includes a site evaluation
which considers such factors as location, access by roadways, condition of the
apartments and amenities. In addition, a Metropolitan employee visits each
location before a loan approval is made. The underwriting process also involves
an evaluation of the borrower, whether the borrower is an individual or a group
of individuals acting as a separate entity. The financial statements of each of
the individual borrowers are reviewed and personal guarantees in an amount equal
to the original principal amount of the loan are generally obtained. The
financial statements of individual guarantors are reviewed by senior officers of
Metropolitan. Another important aspect of Metropolitan's underwriting of its
multifamily residential loans is the debt service coverage test of the property.
Debt service coverage requirements are determined based upon the individual
characteristics of each loan, and are typically a ratio of at least 1.15. In
order to factor in the adjustable rate of the multifamily loans, the debt
service coverage is calculated at a rate in excess of the initial interest rate
of the loan.
At December 31, 1996, $111.3 million or 40.3% of Metropolitan's
multifamily residential loan portfolio was purchased. Prior to purchasing these
loans, Metropolitan utilizes a similar underwriting process with substantially
the same standards as for its originated loans. Real estate located in Ohio
secures 54.9% of Metropolitan's multifamily residential loan portfolio.
Underlying real estate for the remaining loans is primarily located in Michigan,
Pennsylvania and New Jersey. In addition, at December 31, 1996, 11.6% of the
multifamily residential loan portfolio was secured by real estate in California.
Commercial Real Estate Lending. Although Metropolitan has always held
a limited investment in loans secured by commercial real estate, this portion of
the portfolio has increased mainly through purchases in the last three years. At
December 31, 1996, Metropolitan's loans secured by commercial real estate
totalled $135.6 million or 19.8% of Metropolitan's total portfolio, with an
average loan size of $506,000. Of this amount, $43.0 million or 31.7% was
originated by Metropolitan and $92.6 million or 68.3% represented seasoned loans
purchased from a variety of sources.
Loans secured by commercial real estate are purchased by Metropolitan
when they are in the primary lending markets being targeted by Metropolitan, are
generally secured by retail strip shopping centers or office buildings, and meet
Metropolitan's yield and term requirements. The $92.6 million of purchased
commercial real estate loans were acquired by Metropolitan from 1993 to 1996.
To a much lesser extent Metropolitan originates commercial real estate
loans secured by strip shopping centers and small office buildings. Through
customer referrals and real estate brokers, Metropolitan lends on commercial
real estate in Northern and Central Ohio, Northern Kentucky, and Southeastern
Michigan. These loans are adjustable on a one-, three- or five-year schedule
with amortization of 25 or 30 years at a margin over the appropriate term
treasuries. The maximum loan to value ratio is 75%.
8
9
The following table presents information as to the locations and types
of properties securing Metropolitan's multifamily and commercial real estate
portfolio as of December 31, 1996:
NUMBER
OF LOANS % PRINCIPAL %
-------- - --------- -
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Ohio:
Apartments 229 33.8% $151,795 36.8%
Office buildings 57 8.4 26,202 6.4
Retail centers 42 6.2 31,320 7.6
Other 42 6.2 12,044 2.9
---- ----- -------- ----
Total 370 54.6 221,361 53.7
--- ----- -------- ----
California:
Apartments 45 6.7 32,100 7.8
Office buildings 5 0.7 6,234 1.5
Retail centers 2 0.3 1,690 0.4
Other 4 0.6 3,353 0.8
---- ----- -------- -----
Total 56 8.3 43,377 10.5
--- ----- -------- -----
Pennsylvania:
Apartments 57 8.4 20,837 5.1
Office buildings 2 0.3 86 ---
Retail centers 6 0.9 9,536 2.3
Other 4 0.6 638 0.1
---- ----- -------- ----
Total 69 10.2 31,097 7.5
---- ----- -------- ----
Michigan:
Apartments 11 1.6 23,401 5.7
Office buildings 6 0.9 7,229 1.8
Retail centers 6 0.9 9,644 2.3
Other 1 0.2 357 0.1
---- ----- -------- -----
Total 24 3.6 40,631 9.9
---- ----- -------- -----
Other states(1):
Apartments 67 9.9 48,411 11.8
Office buildings 32 4.7 9,562 2.3
Retail centers 27 4.0 11,513 2.8
Other 32 4.7 6,227 1.5
--- ----- -------- -----
Total 158 23.3 75,713 18.4
--- ----- -------- -----
677 100.0% $412,179 100.0%
=== ===== ======= =====
(1) Properties securing loans in other states are located in eleven other states, none of which exceed 5.0% of the outstanding
principal balance of the total multifamily and commercial real estate portfolio.
The following table presents aggregate information as to the type of
security as of December 31, 1996:
AVERAGE
NUMBER BALANCE
OF LOANS PER LOAN PRINCIPAL %
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Apartments 409 $676 $276,544 67.1%
Office buildings 102 483 49,312 12.0
Retail centers 83 768 63,704 15.4
Other 83 273 22,619 5.5
--- -------- -----
Total 677 $609 $412,179 100.0%
=== ======= =====
9
10
One- to Four-family Residential Lending. In 1996, about 50% of
Metropolitan's one- to four-family residential loans were originated through its
full service retail sales offices. The remainder were originated by commissioned
loan officers. Metropolitan has focused its one- to four-family residential
lending efforts primarily on the origination of loans secured by first mortgages
on owner-occupied residences. As of December 31, 1996, Metropolitan's one- to
four-family residential mortgages totalled $114.8 million or 16.8% of
Metropolitan's loan portfolio.
Metropolitan emphasizes the origination of conventional ARM loans for
retention in Metropolitan's portfolio and fixed rate loans suitable for sale in
the secondary market. In addition, Metropolitan offers fixed rate end loan
financing to purchasers building homes with Metropolitan's approved construction
loan builders. Metropolitan retains only a limited dollar amount of this fixed
rate end loan financing in its portfolio. The amount being originated and
subsequently retained is monitored very closely. Substantially all of
Metropolitan's one- to four-family residential mortgage loans originated for
retention in Metropolitan's portfolio are secured by property located in its
Northeast Ohio market area. At December 31, 1996, Metropolitan's fixed rate
residential mortgage loan portfolio totalled $41.4 million, or 6.1% of
Metropolitan's total loan portfolio.
Metropolitan is presently originating three types of ARM products for
retention in its portfolio. The first product is a one-year adjustable ARM, the
interest rate being subject to change annually. The adjustments are based upon
the weekly average yield on U.S. Treasury securities adjusted to a constant
maturity of one year, and are generally limited to a 2% maximum annual interest
rate adjustment, as well as a maximum lifetime adjustment of 6%. The second
product, known as a five/one ARM, has the same index and caps as the one year
ARM; the five/one ARM, however, retains its initial interest rate for the first
five years of the loan and then begins to adjust annually in the sixth year. The
third product, the three-year ARM, allows for interest rate adjustments every
three years. The adjustments are based upon the weekly average yield on U.S.
Treasury securities adjusted to a constant maturity of three years, and are
generally limited to a 2% maximum interest rate adjustment per change, as well
as a maximum lifetime adjustment of 6%.
Metropolitan's originated ARMs do not permit negative amortization of
principal and most of them are convertible into fixed rate mortgages. If
converted, they are typically sold in the secondary market. ARMs are originated
with terms to maturity of up to 30 years, and borrowers are qualified based upon
secondary market requirements.
At December 31, 1996, $23.4 million, or 20.4% of Metropolitan's one-
to four-family residential loan portfolio was purchased. Prior to purchasing
these loans, Metropolitan utilizes an underwriting process with substantially
the same standards as for its originated loans. During 1995 and 1996,
Metropolitan purchased fixed rate one- to four-family residential loans in the
manner previously described and at the same time sold non-refundable options to
purchase those loans to a third party. In all cases, these options were
exercised.
Construction Lending and Land Development. Metropolitan originates
construction loans on single family homes to small, local builders (who
typically build less than fifteen homes per year) in Metropolitan's primary
lending market and to individual borrowers on owner-occupied properties.
Metropolitan also makes loans to builders for the purchase of fully-improved
single family lots and to developers for the purpose of developing land into
single family lots. Metropolitan's market area for construction lending is in
Ohio and primarily in Cuyahoga County, but loans are also made in Lake, Geauga,
Summit, Medina, Portage, and Lorain counties. Metropolitan has one commissioned
construction loan originator in the high volume Columbus, Ohio construction
market to originate single family construction loans and improved lot loans.
The following table presents the number, amount, and type of
properties securing Metropolitan's residential construction and land development
loans at December 31, 1996:
NUMBER PRINCIPAL
OF LOANS BALANCE
-------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION LOANS:
Owner-occupied 27 $ 6,767
Builder presold 45 7,450
Builder spec/model 89 16,721
Allocated construction loans (LOC) 18 17,060
Lot loans 51 4,810
Development loans 17 8,926
COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION LOANS 2 9,825
LAND LOANS 5 138
---- -------
Total: 254 $71,697
=== ======
10
11
Metropolitan's risk of loss on a construction loan is largely
dependent upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property's value upon
completion of the project and the estimated cost of the project. The application
process includes a submission of the cost, specifications and plans.
Metropolitan also reviews the borrower's financial position and requires a
personal guarantee on all builder loans. All loans are based upon the appraised
value of the underlying collateral, as completed. Appraisals are completed by
qualified outside fee appraisers who have been approved by Metropolitan's Board
of Directors.
Each type of loan has a maximum loan to value ratio which is
established by the contract price, cost estimate or appraised value, whichever
is less. The maximum loan to value ratio for each type of construction loan is
as follows: owner-occupied homes - 80%; builder presold homes - 80%; builder
models or speculative homes - 75%; lot loans - 75%; development loans - 70%
(development of single-family home lots for resale to builders) and 75%
(development of land for cluster or condominium projects which will be part of
an allocated construction loan).
All of Metropolitan's construction loans that are made to builders are
made for relatively short terms (six to 24 months) and are made with an
adjustable rate of interest. Owner-occupied loans are initially adjustable rate
loans with the option to convert to a fixed rate product only upon the
completion of the home. These loans increase the yield on, and the proportion of
interest rate sensitive loans in, Metropolitan's portfolio.
Lines of credit or allocated construction loans are used to build
single family homes only and cannot be used for any other purpose. All lines of
credit are secured by the homes that are built with the draws under such credit
agreements. Most of the homes built with the line of credit funds are presold
homes, and the number of spec and model homes allowed to be built is limited by
the financial strength of the builder. Lines of credit can only be utilized
where a builder owns a specific number of lots in a development. Draws are based
upon the percentage of completion, and at all times, funds remain to complete
the home. Disbursements are only made after receipt of a property inspection and
a mechanic's lien update from the title company.
To a much lesser extent, Metropolitan originates construction loans on
commercial real estate projects where Metropolitan intends to provide the
financing once construction is complete. These loans are underwritten in a
manner similar to originated and purchased commercial real estate loans
described above.
Consumer Lending. The underwriting standards employed by Metropolitan
for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant's payment history on
other debts and an assessment of the applicant's ability to meet existing
obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although creditworthiness of the
applicant is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a
comparison of the value of the security, if any, in relation to the proposed
loan amount.
Consumer loans entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans,
particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured or are secured by
rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles. At December 31, 1996, $44.6
million or 82.4% of Metropolitan's $54.2 million consumer loan portfolio was
secured. However, even in the case of secured loans, repossessed collateral for
a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the
outstanding loan balance due to the higher likelihood of damage, loss or
depreciation. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent upon the
borrower's continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be
affected by adverse personal circumstances. Furthermore, the application of
various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may
limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.
At December 31, 1996, Metropolitan's credit card portfolio had an
outstanding balance of $7.5 million with $22.5 million in unused credit lines.
Of the outstanding balance, $2.2 million related to cards originated by
Metropolitan and $5.3 million related to credit card relationships purchased by
Metropolitan.
Business Lending. Metropolitan began offering business loans in late 1994. At
December 31, 1996, Metropolitan had $23.5 million of business loans outstanding,
or 3.4% of Metropolitan's total loan portfolio, against available lines on
existing business loans totalling $29.7 million. Metropolitan's business lending
activities encompass loans with a variety of purposes and security, including
loans to finance accounts receivable, inventory and equipment. Generally,
Metropolitan's business lending has been limited to borrowers headquartered, or
doing business in, Metropolitan's retail market area.
11
12
The following table sets forth information regarding the number and
amount of Metropolitan's business loans as of December 31, 1996:
TOTAL OUTSTANDING
NUMBER LOAN PRINCIPAL
OF LOANS COMMITMENT BALANCE
-------- ---------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
LOANS SECURED BY:
Accounts receivable, inventory and equipment 107 $22,599 $18,194
Second lien on real estate 9 3,432 1,852
First lien on real estate 12 1,972 1,848
Specific equipment and machinery 15 631 631
Titled vehicles 13 309 309
Stocks and bonds 4 148 148
Certificates of deposit 2 120 117
UNSECURED LOANS 12 450 409
---- -------- --------
Total business loans 174 $29,661 $23,508
=== ======= =======
Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the
basis of the borrower's ability to make repayment from his or her employment and
other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be
more easily ascertainable, business loans are of higher risk and typically are
made on the basis of the borrower's ability to make repayment from the cash flow
of the borrower's business. As a result, the availability of funds for the
repayment of business loans may be substantially dependent upon the success of
the business itself. Furthermore, the collateral securing the loans may
depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value
based on the success of the business.
SECONDARY MARKET ACTIVITIES
In addition to originating loans for its own portfolio, Metropolitan
participates in secondary mortgage market activities by selling whole loans and
creating mortgage-backed securities to the Federal National Mortgage Association
("FNMA") and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"). Secondary
market sales allow Metropolitan to make loans during periods when deposit flows
decline, or are not otherwise available, and at times when customers prefer
loans with long-term fixed interest rates which Metropolitan does not choose to
originate for its own portfolio. Metropolitan's primary focus in its mortgage
banking operations is on the sale of fixed rate one- to four-family residential
mortgage loans.
The secondary market for mortgage loans is comprised of institutional
investors who purchase loans meeting certain underwriting specifications with
respect to loan-to-value ratios, maturities and yields. Subject to market
conditions, Metropolitan tailors certain real estate loan programs to meet the
specifications of FHLMC and FNMA, two of the largest institutional investors.
Metropolitan may retain a portion of the loan origination fee paid by the
borrower and receive annual servicing fees as compensation for retaining
responsibility for and performing the servicing of all loans sold to
institutional investors. See "--Loan Servicing Activities." The sale of
substantially all loans to FHLMC and FNMA is nonrecourse to Metropolitan.
The terms and conditions under which such sales are made depend upon,
among other things, the specific requirements of each institutional investor,
the type of loan, the interest rate environment and Metropolitan's relationship
with the institutional investor. In the case of single-family residential loans,
Metropolitan periodically obtains formal commitments primarily with FHLMC and
FNMA. Pursuant to these commitments, FHLMC or FNMA is obligated to purchase a
specific dollar amount of whole loans over a specified period of time. The terms
of the commitments range from ten to sixty days. The pricing will vary,
depending upon the length of each commitment. Loans are classified as held for
sale while Metropolitan is negotiating the sale of specific loans which meet
selected criteria to a specific investor. Metropolitan also sells multifamily
and commercial real estate loans to private investors. The majority of
Metropolitan's sales of multifamily and commercial real estate loans are made
pursuant to individually negotiated whole loan or participation sales agreements
for individual loans or for a package of such loans.
12
13
LOAN SERVICING ACTIVITIES
At December 31, 1996, Metropolitan's overall servicing portfolio was
$1.6 billion. Of such amount, loans serviced for others totalled $1.1 billion.
The following table summarizes the portfolio by investor and source:
ORIGINATED PURCHASED
SERVICING SERVICING TOTAL
--------- --------- -----
(IN THOUSANDS)
One- to Four-family:
Metropolitan portfolio $ 105,769 $ 105,769
FHLMC 170,106 $521,728 691,834
FNMA 63,588 236,698 300,286
Private investors -- 11,929 11,929
--------- -------- ---------
Total One- to Four-family 339,463 770,355 1,109,818
-------- -------- ---------
Multifamily and Commercial:
Metropolitan portfolio 354,558 354,558
FHLMC 13,791 7,664 21,455
FNMA 28,149 25,428 53,577
Private investors 20,531 2,902 23,433
-------- -------- ----------
Total Multifamily and Commercial 417,029 35,994 453,023
-------- -------- ----------
Total $756,492 $806,349 $1,562,841
======== ======== ==========
Metropolitan services the loans that it originates. When Metropolitan
sells loans to an investor, such as FHLMC or FNMA, it retains the servicing
rights for the loans. Servicing fee income is generated from the loans sold to
investors. In order to further increase Metropolitan's servicing fee income, the
Bank has aggressively pursued purchases of servicing portfolios from other
originating institutions. These purchased servicing portfolios are primarily
FHLMC and FNMA single family loans that are geographically located within the
eastern half of the nation. At December 31, 1996, Metropolitan's purchased
servicing portfolio was $806.3 million and the related balance of PMSRs was $7.3
million.
Approximately 70% of the overall servicing portfolio (by dollar
volume) is comprised of loans sold to investors, primarily FHLMC and FNMA.
Metropolitan receives fee income for servicing these sold loans, ranging from
0.125% on multifamily loans to 0.250% on fixed rate or 0.375% on adjustable rate
residential loans (percentage based upon unpaid principal balances of the loans
serviced). Servicing fees are collected and retained by Metropolitan out of
monthly mortgage payments.
Loan servicing functions include collecting and remitting loan
payments, accounting for principal and interest, holding escrow (impound) funds
for payment of taxes and insurance, making rate and payment changes to
contractually adjustable loans, managing loans in payment default, processing
foreclosure and other litigation activities to recover mortgage debts,
conducting property inspections and risk assessment for investment loans and
general administration of loans for the investors to whom they are sold, and for
Metropolitan as mortgagee.
LOAN OPTION INCOME
During 1995, Metropolitan developed a program to purchase loans and
sell loan options in order to take advantage of its underwriting capabilities,
increase net interest income and increase non-interest income. In these
transactions, Metropolitan purchases loans and sells nonrefundable options to a
third party to purchase these same loans at a specified price within a specified
time period. The Bank, prior to purchasing the loans that will be subject to the
options, utilizes a similar underwriting process with substantially the same
standards as in its origination process. In the event the option is not
exercised, Metropolitan would sell the underlying loans or transfer them to the
Bank's portfolio at its fair value at the date of the transfer. A nonrefundable
option fee is negotiated based on a percentage of the principal amount of the
loans involved. The third party acquiring the option is a loan broker who
markets the loans to potential buyers who may be willing to pay a higher price
for the loans. To date, Metropolitan has entered into these option transactions
with one loan broker. At December 31, 1996, loans with a carrying value of $6.4
million were held for sale in connection with outstanding options and $696,000
has been recognized in income in connection with these loan options during the
year then ended.
13
14
LOAN DELINQUENCIES AND NON-PERFORMING ASSETS
When a borrower fails to make a required payment on a loan,
Metropolitan attempts to cause the delinquency to be cured by contacting the
borrower. In the case of real estate loans, a late notice is sent 15 days after
the due date. If the delinquency is not cured by the 30th day, contact with the
borrower is made by phone. Additional written and verbal contacts are made with
the borrower between 30 and 90 days after the due date. If the delinquency
continues for a period of 90 days, Metropolitan usually institutes appropriate
action to foreclose on the property. If foreclosed, the property is sold at
public auction and may be purchased by Metropolitan. Delinquent consumer loans
are handled in a generally similar manner, except that initial contacts are made
when the payment is 10 days past due and appropriate action may be taken to
collect any loan payment that is delinquent for more than 30 days.
Metropolitan's procedures for repossession and sale of consumer collateral are
subject to various requirements under state consumer protection laws.
14
15
The following table sets forth information concerning delinquent loans
at December 31, 1996, in dollar amounts and as a percentage of each category of
Metropolitan's loan portfolio. The amounts presented represent the total
remaining principal balances of the related loans, rather than the actual
payment amounts which are overdue.
LOANS DELINQUENT FOR:
60-89 DAYS 90 DAYS AND OVER TOTAL DELINQUENT LOANS
----------- ---------------- ----------------------
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF LOAN OF LOAN OF LOAN
NUMBER AMOUNT CATEGORY NUMBER AMOUNT CATEGORY NUMBER AMOUNT CATEGORY
------ ------ -------- ------ ------ -------- ------ ------ --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Real Estate
One- to four-family 2 $ 96 0.08% 8 $ 950 0.83% 10 $1,046 0.91%
Multifamily -- -- -- 2 871 0.31 2 871 0.31
Commercial 1 127 0.09 2 2,032 1.50 3 2,159 1.59
Construction and land -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Consumer 45 206 0.38 240 1,073 1.98 285 1,279 2.36
Business -- -- -- 5 268 1.14 5 268 1.14
--- ----- ---- ------ ---- ------
Total 48 $429 0.06% 257 $5,194 0.77% 305 $5,623 0.83%
== ==== === ====== === ======
15
16
Non-performing assets include all non-accrual loans, loans past due
greater than 90 days still accruing and real estate acquired in foreclosure.
Interest is not accrued on loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to
interest or principal payments and as to which payment of principal and interest
in full is not expected unless in the judgment of management the loan is well
secured, and no loss in principal or interest is expected.
When a loan reaches non-accrual status, interest accruals are
discontinued and prior accruals are reversed. The classification of a loan on
non-accrual status does not necessarily indicate that the principal is
uncollectible in whole or in part. A determination as to collectibility is made
by the management of Metropolitan on a case-by-case basis. Metropolitan
considers both the adequacy of the collateral and the other resources of the
borrower in determining the steps to be taken to collect non-accrual loans. The
final determination as to these steps is made on a case-by-case basis.
Alternatives that are considered are commencing foreclosure, collecting on
guarantees, restructuring the loan or instituting collection lawsuits.
The following table summarizes non-performing assets by category as of the dates
indicated.
AT DECEMBER 31,
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Non-accruing loans
One- to four-family $ 950 $ 293 $ 337 $ 475 $ 258
Multifamily 871 2,138 1,585 549 180
Commercial real estate 2,032 391 150 691 --
Construction and land development -- 15 15 1,051 518
Consumer 802 266 153 53 21
Business 268 -- -- -- --
------ ------ ------ ----- ---
Total non-accruing loans 4,923 3,103 2,240 2,819 977
Loans past due greater than 90
days still accruing 271 204 128 277
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total non-performing loans 5,194 3,307 2,368 3,096 977
Real estate owned 177 258 53 941 230
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total non-performing assets $5,371 $3,565 $2,421 $4,037 $1,207
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Non-performing loans to total loans .80% 0.68% 0.55% 1.08% 0.44%
Non-performing assets to total
assets .70% 0.60% 0.51% 1.08% 0.40%
For the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, gross interest income
which would have been recorded had the non-accruing loans been current in
accordance with their original terms amounted to $439,000 and $86,000,
respectively. The amounts that were included in interest income on such loans
were $85,000 and $10,000 for the years ended 1996 and 1995, respectively.
Non-performing assets were $5.4 million at December 31, 1996, an
increase of $1.8 million from $3.6 million at December 31, 1995, primarily due
to two retail strip shopping centers and one multifamily property. During the
same time period total net loans receivable increased $166.6 million to $646.5
million at December 31, 1996. One retail strip shopping center was sold to a
third party at sheriff's sale subsequent to year end and Metropolitan recovered
its full investment. Based upon current appraisals, no loss is anticipated on
the other retail strip shopping center and the anticipated loss of $236,000 on
the multifamily property has been reserved. At December 31, 1996, all loans
classified by management as impaired were included in non-performing loans.
At December 31, 1996, Metropolitan had potential problem loans
totalling $1.4 million which were classified by management as substandard and
were not included in the table above. Although these loans were current or not
seriously delinquent, there is some unfavorable circumstance surrounding each
loan which, if not corrected, could result in the loan changing to nonaccrual
status and/or a loss being incurred. Metropolitan is in contact with these
borrowers and monitors their status closely.
Metropolitan adopted SFAS No. 114 and SFAS No. 118 effective January
1, 1995. All loans identified as impaired by Metropolitan were also classified
as non-accruing loans at December 31, 1995 and 1996 and therefore the adoption
of SFAS No. 114 and SFAS No. 118 had no effect on the comparability of
non-performing assets at December 31, 1995 and 1996 to prior periods.
16
17
ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOSSES ON LOANS
Because some loans may not be repaid in full, an allowance for losses
on loans is maintained. The allowance is maintained by management at a level
considered adequate to cover possible losses that are currently anticipated
based on past loss experience, general economic conditions, information about
specific borrower situations, including their financial position and collateral
values, and other factors and estimates which are subject to change over time.
While management may periodically allocate portions of the allowance for
specific problem loans, the whole allowance is available for any loan
charge-offs that occur. A loan is charged off against the allowance by
management as a loss when deemed uncollectible, although collection efforts
continue and future recoveries may occur.
17
18
The following table sets forth an allocation of the allowance for
losses on loans among categories as of the dates indicated. Management believes
that any allocation of the allowance for losses on loans into categories lends
an appearance of precision which does not exist. The allowance is utilized as a
single unallocated allowance available for all loans. The following allocation
table should not be interpreted as an indication of the specific amounts or the
relative proportion of future charges to the allowance.
DECEMBER 31,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
------------------- -------------------- -------------------- ----------------- -----------------
PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT
OF LOANS OF LOANS OF LOANS OF LOANS OF LOANS
IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH IN EACH
CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY CATEGORY
TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL TO TOTAL
AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS AMOUNT LOANS
------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------ -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
One- to four-family $ 228 17.1% $ 172 15.2% $ 189 25.2% $ 93 16.0% $ 50 17.5%
Multifamily 1,020 40.8 887 45.8 733 41.9 494 53.2 361 54.7
Commercial real estate 937 20.3 676 21.5 358 18.6 314 17.5 195 15.5
Construction and land 193 10.5 167 9.5 99 8.5 90 9.9 56 10.2
Consumer 1,182 7.9 512 6.3 340 5.8 124 3.4 53 2.1
Business 197 3.4 74 1.7 1 0.0 -- -- -- --
Unallocated 418 -- 277 -- 191 -- 124 -- 11 --
------- ------- ------- ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ----- ------
Total $4,175 100.0% $2,765 100.0% $1,911 100.0% $1,239 100.0% $726 100.0%
====== ======= ======= ====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ===== ======
18
19
With the uncertainties that could adversely impact the overall quality of
Metropolitan's loan portfolio, management of Metropolitan considers an adequate
allowance for losses on loans essential. The unallocated allowance is considered
adequate to cover losses from the existing loans that have not demonstrated
problems such as late payments, financial difficulty of the borrower or
deterioration of collateral values. The risks associated with off-balance sheet
commitments are insignificant in the opinion of management of Metropolitan and
therefore, no allowance for such commitments is provided.
At December 31, 1996, management had allocated $241,000 of the allowance
for losses on loans to impaired loans with balances of $721,000. The remaining
$2.8 million of impaired loan balances did not require an allocation of the
allowance for losses on loans in the opinion of management. The adoption of SFAS
No. 114 had no impact on the comparability of the December 31, 1996 allowance
for losses on loans allocation to prior periods.
The following table provides an analysis of Metropolitan's allowance for
losses on loans for the periods indicated. In each period, the provision for
loan losses was based on an analysis of individual credits, prior and current
loss experience, overall growth in the portfolio and current economic
conditions.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Balance at beginning of period $ 2,765 $1,911 $1,239 $ 725 $ 495
Charge-offs:
One- to four-family 22 23 23 50 6
Multifamily 119 -- 64 100 --
Commercial real estate -- 27 -- 74 174
Construction and land -- -- -- -- --
Consumer 95 56 14 5 8
Business -- -- -- -- --
------ ----- ------ ------ -----
Total charge-offs 236 106 101 229 188
------ ----- ------ ------ -----
Recoveries:
One- to four-family -- 1 1 3 --
Multifamily -- -- 6 -- --
Commercial real estate -- -- -- -- --
Construction and land -- -- -- -- 51
Consumer 11 -- -- -- --
Business -- -- -- -- --
----- ----- ------ ------ -----
Total recoveries 11 1 7 3 51
----- ----- ------ ------ -----
Net charge-offs 225 105 94 226 137
Provision for loan losses 1,635 959 766 740 367
----- ------ ------ ------ -----
Balance at end of period $4,175 $2,765 $1,911 $1,239 $ 725
====== ====== ====== ====== =====
Net charge-offs to average
loans 0.04% 0.02% 0.03% 0.09% 0.07%
Provision for loan losses to
average loans 0.28% 0.21% 0.21% 0.29% 0.19%
Allowance for losses on loans
to total non-performing loans
at end of period 77.73% 83.60% 80.70% 40.02% 74.21%
Allowance for losses on loans
to total loans at end of period 0.64% 0.57% 0.45% 0.43% 0.32%
19
20
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
Metropolitan maintains its investment portfolio based on regulatory
requirements and restrictions which dictate the type of securities that can be
held. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") System, the Bank is
required to hold a minimum amount of FHLB stock based upon asset size and mix.
As the Bank grows, this investment will increase.
The following table summarizes the amounts and the distribution of
Metropolitan's securities held as of the dates indicated:
AT DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
(IN THOUSANDS)
Securities available for sale:
Mutual funds $ 2,009 $10,364 --
U.S. Treasury securities 6,065 12,442 $7,641
FNMA preferred stock 5,100
FHLB stock 3,989 3,569 2,311
-------- -------- -------
Total $17,163 $26,375 $9,952
======= ======= ======
Other interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits with banks 2,745 $4,788 $1,080
Term repurchase agreements 6,000 -- --
------- --------- --------
Total $8,745 $4,788 $1,080
====== ====== ======
The following table sets forth the contractual maturities and
approximate weighted average yields of Metropolitan's securities available for
sale at December 31, 1996.
DUE IN
-------------------------------
ONE YEAR ONE YEAR TO
OR LESS FIVE YEARS TOTAL
------- ---------- -----
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Mutual Funds $2,009 -- $2,009
U.S. Treasury securities -- $6,065 6,065
FNMA preferred stock 5,100 -- 5,100
FHLB stock 3,989 -- 3,989
-------- ---------- --------
Total $11,098 $6,065 $17,163
======= ====== =======
Weighted average yield 6.48% 6.61% 6.53%
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES PORTFOLIO
The following table sets forth Metropolitan's mortgage-backed
securities portfolio at the dates indicated. All securities are classified as
available for sale.
AT DECEMBER 31,
--------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
(IN THOUSANDS)
FNMA pass-through certificates $19,775 $22,549 --
GNMA pass-through certificates 9,700 11,348 $11,274
FHLMC participation certificates 26,713 4,715 4,956
Sears Mortgage Corporation obligations 484 543 555
------- ------- -------
Total $56,672 $39,155 $16,785
======= ======= =======
20
21
The following table sets forth the contractual maturities and approximate
weighted average yields of Metropolitan's mortgage-backed securities at December
31, 1996.
DUE IN
------------------------------------------
ONE TO FIVE TO OVER OUTSTANDING
FIVE YEARS TEN YEARS TEN YEARS BALANCE
---------- --------- --------- -------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
AVAILABLE FOR SALE:
FNMA pass-through certificates $1,150 $18,625 $19,775
GNMA pass-through certificates 158 9,542 9,700
FHLMC participation certificates $12,291 -- 14,422 26,713
Sears Mortgage Corporation
obligations -- -- 484 484
------- ------ ------- -------
Total available for sale $12,291 $1,308 $43,073 $56,672
======= ====== ======= =======
Weighted average yield 7.00% 6.06% 6.46% 6.57%
SOURCES OF FUNDS
The Bank's primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization and
repayment of loan principal, borrowings, sales of mortgage loans, sales or
maturities of mortgage-backed securities, securities, and short-term
investments. Deposits are the principal source of Metropolitan's funds for
lending and investment purposes. The following paragraphs provide a brief
description of the types of accounts offered by Metropolitan:
Passbook and Statement Savings Accounts. Savings may be invested in
and withdrawn from regular passbook, tiered passbook and statement savings
accounts without restriction. Interest on tiered passbook accounts is compounded
monthly and credited monthly. Interest on regular passbook and statement savings
accounts is compounded quarterly and credited quarterly.
Checking Accounts. Metropolitan offers two interest-bearing checking
and one noninterest-bearing checking account. The non-interest checking requires
no minimum balance and has no monthly service fees. The rate paid on the
interest checking account is dependent upon the balance in the account. Monthly
service charges can be waived on personal interest-bearing checking accounts by
maintaining either a $1,000 minimum balance or greater than $5,000 minimum
balance in another deposit account or establishing a direct deposit
relationship. All accounts have no minimum maturity or penalty for early
withdrawal and no restrictions on the size and frequency of the withdrawals or
additional deposits. Metropolitan regularly reviews the interest rate paid on
the interest-bearing checking accounts and adjusts the rate based on cash flow
projections and market interest rates.
Individual Retirement Accounts ("IRA"). Metropolitan offers IRAs.
Funds may be invested in a passbook account or any certificate of deposit
offered by Metropolitan.
Certificates of Deposit. Metropolitan offers fixed rate, fixed term
certificates of deposit. Terms are from seven days to five years, and there are
no regulatory rate ceilings. Certificates of deposit require a penalty for
withdrawal prior to maturity dates. These accounts are the highest cost deposit
product offered by Metropolitan. Interest rates offered on certificates of
deposit are regularly reviewed and adjusted based on cash flow projections and
market interest rates.
21
22
The following table sets forth information regarding trends in
Metropolitan's average deposits for the periods indicated.
DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995
--------------------------------- ------------------------------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
AVERAGE PERCENT RATE AVERAGE PERCENT RATE
AMOUNT OF TOTAL PAID AMOUNT OF TOTAL PAID
------ -------- ---- ------ -------- ----
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits(1) $31,248 5.5% $ 24,636 5.3%
Interest-bearing demand deposits 36,273 6.4 2.64% 37,695 8.1 2.57%
Savings deposits 169,866 30.2 4.79 118,475 25.5 4.76
Time deposits 325,960 57.9 5.83 283,186 61.1 5.98
------- ------ -------- -----
Total average deposits $563,347 100.0% 4.97 $463,992 100.0% 5.07
======== ===== ======== =====
December 31
------------------------------
1994
------------------------------
AVERAGE PERCENT RATE
AMOUNT OF TOTAL PAID
------ -------- ----
$18,388 4.8%
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits(1) 57,124 15.0 2.52%
Interest-bearing demand deposits 88,723 23.2 3.57
Savings deposits 217,706 57.0 4.74
Time deposits -------- -----
$381,941 100.0% 3.91
Total average deposits ======== =====
(1) Includes principal and interest custodial accounts and taxes and insurance custodial accounts for loans
serviced for FHLMC, FNMA and private investors.
22
23
Deposits increased 23.5% to $622.1 million at December 31, 1996 consistent
with the overall growth of the Bank. The growth was primarily in time deposits
which increased 25.1% to $375.5 million. During the same period, the mix of
demand accounts and savings accounts remained unchanged.
The following table shows rate and maturity information for Metropolitan's
certificates of deposit as of December 31, 1996.
2.00- 5.00- 7.00- PERCENT
4.99% 6.99% 8.99% TOTAL OF TOTAL
----- ----- ----- ----- --------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
CERTIFICATE ACCOUNTS MATURING
IN QUARTER ENDING:
March 31, 1997 $24,827 $ 80,217 $5,480 $ 110,524 29.7%
June 30, 1997 313 66,005 233 66,551 17.7
September 30, 1997 3 56,824 589 57,416 15.3
December 31, 1997 124 49,626 931 50,681 13.5
March 31, 1998 62 35,484 2,121 37,667 10.0
June 30, 1998 52 16,638 315 17,005 4.5
September 30, 1998 19 3,607 -- 3,626 1.0
December 31, 1998 18 5,478 55 5,551 1.5
March 31, 1999 57 322 475 854 0.0
June 30, 1999 22 2,457 45 2,524 1.0
September 30, 1999 -- 398 -- 398 0.0
December 31, 1999 -- 1,393 1,517 2,910 1.0
Thereafter -- 6,236 13,517 19,753 5.3
------- -------- ------- -------- ----
Total $25,497 $324,685 $25,278 $375,460 100.0%
======= ======== ======= ======== =====
Percent of total 6.8% 86.5% 6.7% 100.0%
===== ==== === =====
The following table sets forth the remaining maturity for time
deposits of $100,000 or more at the date indicated.
DECEMBER 31,
1996
----
(IN THOUSANDS)
Three months or less $ 13,822
Over three through six months 9,274
Over six through twelve months 16,268
Over twelve months 19,152
-------
Total $58,516
=======
In addition to deposits, Metropolitan relies on borrowed funds. The
following describes Metropolitan's current borrowings:
Subordinated Note Offerings. In 1993 and early 1994, Metropolitan
issued subordinated notes with an aggregate principal balance of $4.9 million
through a private placement offering ("1993 Subordinated Notes"). The interest
rate on the 1993 Subordinated Notes is 10%, which is paid quarterly and
principal will be repaid when the notes mature on December 31, 2001.
Metropolitan may redeem the 1993 Subordinated Notes, in whole or in part, at any
time from time to time, paying the outstanding principal amount plus accrued
interest and a prepayment premium. The prepayment premium was 10% of the
principal amount prepaid if such prepayment was made during the first year
following the issuance of the 1993 Subordinated Notes and the prepayment premium
reduces 1% for each year the 1993 Subordinated Notes are outstanding. If the
1993 Subordinated Notes are prepaid more than seven years after issuance, the
prepayment premium is 3%. The 1993 Subordinated Notes may also be repurchased in
privately negotiated transactions. The 1993 Subordinated Notes are unsecured.
In December 1995, Metropolitan issued subordinated notes with an
aggregate principal balance of $14.0 million through a public offering ("1995
Subordinated Notes"). The interest rate on the notes is 9.625%, which is paid
monthly and principal will be
23
24
repaid when the notes mature on January 1, 2005. The 1995 Subordinated Notes are
not redeemable, in whole or in part, by Metropolitan prior to December 1, 1998.
After December 1, 1998, the 1995 Subordinated Notes may be redeemed by
Metropolitan at a declining premium which begins at 3% of the prepaid principal
amount. After December 1, 2000, the 1995 Subordinated Notes may be prepaid at
par plus accrued interest. The 1995 Subordinated Notes may also be repurchased
in privately negotiated or open market transactions. The 1995 Subordinated Notes
are also unsecured.
Line of Credit. In October 1996, the Corporation amended an existing
line of credit agreement with the Huntington National Bank ("The Huntington Loan
Agreement"). The Huntington Loan Agreement is a revolving line of credit for the
first 24 month period and then it converts to a 36 month term note. The maximum
permitted borrowing amount is $4.0 million. The terms of the Huntington Loan
Agreement require interest only payments for 24 months, then quarterly principal
payments based on a 60-month amortization with a balloon payment due in May
2001. The interest rate during the first 24 months is tied to LIBOR or
Huntington National Bank prime at Metropolitan's option. After conversion to a
term loan in May 1998, the interest rate is prime. As collateral for the
Huntington Loan Agreement, Mr. Kaye, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Metropolitan, has agreed to pledge a portion of his shares of Common Stock of
Metropolitan in an amount at least equal in value to 200% of any outstanding
balance. At December 31, 1996, there was no outstanding balance under the
Huntington Loan Agreement.
FHLB Advances. The FHLB makes funds available for housing finance to
eligible financial institutions like Metropolitan. The FHLB generally limits
advances to 25% of assets with a total borrowing limit of 40% of assets from all
borrowing sources. Advances are collateralized by any combination of the
following assets and collateralization rates: one- to four-family first mortgage
loans, not past due greater than 90 days, pledged on a blanket basis at 150% of
the advance amount, specifically identified mortgage loans at 125% of the
advance amount and various types of investment and mortgage-backed securities at
rates ranging from 101-110% of the advance amount. FHLB stock owned by the Bank
is pledged as additional collateral but is not available as primary collateral.
The aggregate balance of assets pledged as collateral for outstanding FHLB
advances at December 31, 1996 was $89,250,000.
Reverse Repurchase Agreements. From time to time the Bank borrows
funds by using its investment or mortgage-backed securities to issue reverse
repurchase agreements. This type of borrowing provides an alternative source of
funds to FHLB borrowings and at times, more favorable rates. The aggregate
balance of mortgage-backed securities pledged as collateral for reverse
repurchase agreements at December 31, 1996 was $24,714,000.
The following table sets forth the maximum month-end balance and
average balance of other borrowings during the periods indicated.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------------------- ------------------- -----------------
(IN THOUSANDS)
MAXIMUM MONTH-END BALANCE:
FHLB advances $75,150 $51,000 $23,000
Term loan - 3,280 3,640
Qualifying subordinated debt - 1,200 1,600
1993 Subordinated Notes 4,874 4,874 4,874
1995 Subordinated Notes 14,000 14,000 -
Line of credit - 5,000 -
Reverse repos 23,500 9,000 -
AVERAGE BALANCE:
FHLB advances $50,546 $28,467 $3,914
Term Loan - 485 3,420
Qualifying Subordinated Debt - 923 1,220
1993 Subordinated Notes 4,874 4,874 4,874
1995 Subordinated Notes 14,000 690 -
Line of credit - 3,834 -
Reverse repos 4,480 7,591 -
24
25
The following table sets forth the end of period balances at the date indicated
and interest rates during the period then ended.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
--------------------- ------------------- -------------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
BALANCE:
FHLB advances $59,500 $28,000 $6,150
Term loan - - 3,280
Qualifying subordinated debt - - 1,200
1993 Subordinated Notes 4,874 4,874 4,874
1995 Subordinated Notes 14,000 14,000 -
Line of credit - - -
Reverse repos 23,500 - -
WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTEREST RATE:
FHLB advances 5.43% 6.18% 5.20%
Term Loan - 8.79 7.20
Qualifying Subordinated Debt - 11.78 9.93
1993 Subordinated Notes 10.47 10.47 10.47
1995 Subordinated Notes 10.48 10.48 -
Line of credit - 8.67 -
Reverse repos 5.61 6.10 -
COMPETITION
Metropolitan faces strong competition, both in originating real estate
and other loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in originating real
estate loans comes primarily from other savings institutions, commercial banks,
mortgage companies, credit unions, finance companies and insurance companies.
The Bank competes for loans principally on the basis of the interest rates and
loan fees it charges, the type of loans it originates and the quality of
services it provides to borrowers. Some of the Bank's competitors, however, have
higher lending limits and substantially greater financial resources than the
Bank.
The Bank attracts its deposits through its retail sales offices,
primarily from the communities in which those retail sales offices are located;
therefore, competition for those deposits is principally from other savings
institutions, commercial banks, credit unions, mutual funds and brokerage
companies located in the same communities. The Bank competes for these deposits
by offering a variety of deposit accounts at competitive rates, convenient
business hours, and convenient branch locations.
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 1996, Metropolitan had a total of 255 employees,
including part-time employees. The Corporation's employees are not represented
by any collective bargaining group. Management considers its employee relations
to be excellent.
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION
INTRODUCTION
Metropolitan is registered as a savings and loan holding company
within the meaning of the Home Owners' Loan Act (the "HOLA"). As a savings and
loan holding company, Metropolitan is subject to the regulations, examination,
supervision, and reporting requirements of the Office of Thrift Supervision
("OTS"). The Bank, an Ohio-chartered savings and loan association, is a member
of the FHLB System, and its deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") through the Savings Association Insurance Fund
("SAIF"). The Bank is subject to examination and regulation by the OTS, the FDIC
and the
25
26
Ohio Superintendent of Savings and Loan Associations and to regulations
regarding such matters as capital standards, mergers, establishment of branch
offices, subsidiary investments and activities, and general investment
authority. Such examination and regulation is intended primarily for the
protection of depositors.
The descriptions of the statutes and regulation which are applicable
to Metropolitan and the Bank and the effects thereof which are set forth below
and elsewhere in this document do not purport to be a complete description of
such statutes and regulations and their effects on Metropolitan or the Bank or
to identify every statute and regulation that may apply to Metropolitan or the
Bank.
METROPOLITAN
As a savings and loan holding company, Metropolitan is subject to
certain restrictions with respect to its activities and investments. Among other
things, Metropolitan is generally prohibited, either directly or indirectly,
from acquiring control of any other savings association or savings and loan
holding company, absent prior approval of the OTS, and from acquiring more than
5% of the voting stock of any savings association or savings and loan holding
company which is not a subsidiary of Metropolitan.
Similarly, OTS approval must be obtained prior to any person's acquiring
control of the Bank or Metropolitan. Control is conclusively presumed to exist
if, among other things, a person acquires more than 25% of any class of voting
stock of the institution or holding company or controls in any matter the
election of a majority of the directors of the institution or the holding
company. Control is rebuttably presumed to exist if, among other things, a
person acquires more than 10% of any class of voting stock (or 25% of any class
of stock) and is subject to any certain specified "control factors."
THE BANK
General. The OTS also has enforcement authority over all savings
associations. This enforcement authority includes the ability to impose
penalties for and to seek correction of violations of laws and regulations and
unsafe or unsound practices by assessing civil money penalties, issuing cease
and desist or removal and prohibition orders against an institution, its
directors, officers or employees and other persons, or initiating injunctive
actions.
As a lender and a financial institution, the Bank is subject to
various regulations promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board including, without
limitation, Regulation B (Equal Credit Opportunity), Regulation D (Reserves),
Regulation E (Electronic Fund Transfers), Regulation F (Interbank Liabilities),
Regulation Z (Truth in Lending), Regulation CC (Availability of Funds), and
Regulation DD (Truth in Savings). As lenders of loans secured by real property,
and as owners of real property, financial institutions, including the Bank, are
subject to compliance with various statutes and regulations applicable to
property owners generally, including statutes and regulations relating to the
environmental condition of the property.
Insurance of Accounts and Regulation by the FDIC. The Bank is a member
of the SAIF, which is administered by the FDIC. Deposits are insured up to
applicable limits by the FDIC and such insurance is backed by the full faith and
credit of the United States Government. As insurer, the FDIC imposes deposit
insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct examinations of and to require
reporting by FDIC-insured institutions. It also may prohibit any FDIC-insured
institution from engaging in any activity the FDIC determines by regulation or
order to pose a serious risk to the FDIC. The FDIC also has the authority to
initiate enforcement actions against savings associations, after giving the OTS
an opportunity to take such action, and may terminate the deposit insurance if
it determines that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or
unsound practices, or is in an unsafe or unsound condition.
Under the FDIC risk-based deposit insurance assessment system, all
insured depository institutions are placed into one of nine categories and
assessed insurance premiums based upon their level of capital and supervisory
evaluation. Under the system, institutions classified as well-capitalized and
requiring little supervision would pay the lowest premium while institutions
that are classified as undercapitalized and considered of substantial
supervisory concern would pay the highest premium. Risk classification of all
insured institutions is made by the FDIC for each semi-annual assessment period.
With respect to the SAIF, the FDIC is authorized to increase
assessment rates, on a semi-annual basis, if it determines that the reserve
ratio of the SAIF will be less than the designated reserve ratio of 1.25% of
SAIF-insured deposits. In setting these increased assessments, the FDIC must
seek to restore the reserve ratio to that designated reserve level, or such
higher reserve ratio as established by the FDIC. In addition, the FDIC may
impose special assessments on SAIF members to repay amounts borrowed from the
United States Treasury or for any other reason deemed necessary by the FDIC.
26
27
Similarly, with respect to deposits which are insured by the Bank
Insurance Fund ("BIF"), the FDIC is authorized to adjust the insurance premium
rates in order to maintain the reserve ratio of the BIF at 1.25% of BIF-insured
deposits. In setting the BIF assessment rates, the FDIC must maintain the
reserve ratio at that designated reserve level, or such higher reserve ratio as
established by the FDIC. BIF and SAIF assessment rates, however, have not
remained comparable. During fiscal 1996, BIF members generally paid lower
premiums than SAIF-insured institutions, placing SAIF-insured institutions whose
deposits are exclusively or primarily SAIF-insured at a competitive
disadvantage.
As a result of this disparity in insurance premium rates, on September
30, 1996 the President signed into law the Omnibus Bill which included
provisions designed to recapitalize the SAIF and to mitigate the BIF/SAIF
premium disparity. The Omnibus Bill required the FDIC to impose a special
assessment on SAIF-insured deposits held by institutions as of March 31, 1995 in
order that the SAIF achieve the designated reserve ratio. Accordingly, the FDIC
assessed and the Bank paid a $2.9 million special assessment from working
capital of the Bank.
Now that the SAIF has reached it required reserve ratio following the
one-time assessment, the FDIC has reduced the annual assessment rates for
SAIF-insured institutions. Effective January 1, 1997, the SAIF assessment rates
are identical to those for BIF-insured institutions.
The Omnibus Bill also requires the repayment of Financing Corporation
("FICO") bonds to be shared by both SAIF-and BIF-insured institutions. Prior to
the enactment of this legislation, only a portion of the SAIF assessment was
used to repay the $780 million in annual FICO interest payments. However, as of
January 1, 1997, BIF institutions are required to pay a portion of the FICO
interest payments, as well. For the first three years, the BIF assessment rates
for FICO payments are 20% of those for SAIF institutions. Thus, SAIF
institutions, such as the Bank, will continue to be subject to a greater burden
than BIF institutions. The rates established by the FDIC to implement this
requirement for all FDIC-insured institutions are 6.44 basis points on SAIF
deposits and 1.29 basis points on BIF deposits. However, after January 1, 2000,
assessments on BIF-insured institutions will be made on the same basis as
SAIF-insured institutions. It is estimated that the payments of such assessments
will be 2.43 basis points on deposits. It is important to note that these
assessments are only FICO interest payments and that further premiums could be
assessed in order to maintain the BIF and SAIF funds at the required 1.25%
reserve ratio.
In addition, the Omnibus Bill requires the merger of the BIF and SAIF
into a single insurance fund no later than January 1, 1999. In connection with
the merger of the BIF and the SAIF, SAIF-insured institutions could be forced to
convert to state bank charters or national bank charters. If such a proposal
became law, the Corporation would become a bank holding company and be subject
to regulation by the Federal Reserve Board, which imposes capital requirements
on bank holding companies. The Corporation is not currently subject to capital
requirements.
Regulatory Capital Requirements. The capital regulations of the OTS
issued thereunder (the "Capital Regulations") establish a "leverage limit," a
"tangible capital requirement" and a "risk-based capital requirement." In
addition, the OTS may establish, on a case by case basis, individual minimum
capital requirements for a savings association which vary from the requirements
that would otherwise apply under the Capital Regulations. The OTS has not
established such individual minimum capital requirements for the Bank.
A savings association which fails to meet one or more of the
applicable capital requirements is subject to various regulatory limitations and
sanctions, including a prohibition on growth and the issuance of a capital
directive by the OTS requiring the following: an increase in capital; reduction
of rates paid on savings accounts; cessation of or limitations on deposit-taking
and lending; limitations on operational expenditures; an increase in liquidity;
and such other actions deemed necessary or appropriate by the OTS. In addition,
a conservator or receiver may be appointed under certain circumstances.
The leverage limit currently requires a savings association to
maintain "core capital" of not less than 3% of adjusted total assets. The OTS
has taken the position, however, that the prompt corrective action regulatory
scheme (See"-Prompt Corrective Action") has effectively raised the leverage
ratio requirement for all but the most highly-rated institutions to 4% since an
institution is "undercapitalized" for such purpose if, among other things, its
leverage ratio is less than 4% (3% for MACRO 1 rated institutions).
The tangible capital requirement requires a savings association to
maintain "tangible capital" in an amount not less than 1.5% of adjusted total
assets.
The risk-based capital requirement generally provides that a savings
association must maintain total capital in an amount at least equal to 8.0% of
its risk-weighted assets. The risk-based capital regulations are similar to
those applicable to national banks. The regulations assign each asset and
certain off-balance sheet assets held by a savings association to one of four
risk-weighting categories, based upon the degree of credit risk associated with
the particular type of asset.
27
28
Savings associations are required to incorporate interest rate risk in
their capital calculations for determining compliance with capital requirements.
Interest rate risk is measured by the decline in "net portfolio value" that
would result from a hypothetical 200 basis point increase or decrease in market
interest rates, whichever is lower, divided by the estimated economic value of
assets. An institution whose measured interest rate exposure exceeds 2% must
deduct an amount equal to one-half of the difference between its measured
interest rate risk and 2%, multiplied by the estimated economic value of its
total assets, from total capital in determining whether it meets its risk-based
capital requirement.
Banking regulators continue to indicate their desire to raise capital
requirements applicable to financial institutions beyond their current levels.
No prediction can be made as to whether and when higher capital requirements
would be imposed and, if so, to what levels and on what schedule.
Each bank regulatory agency and the OTS review each of their capital
standards every two years to determine whether those standards require
sufficient capital to facilitate prompt corrective action to prevent or minimize
loss to the deposit insurance funds. Each bank regulatory agency and the OTS
revise each of their risk-based capital standards to ensure that those standards
take adequate account of interest rate risk, concentration of credit risk and
the risk of non-traditional activities, and to reflect the actual performance
and expected risk of loss of multifamily mortgages.
At December 31, 1996, the Bank complied with each of the tangible
capital, the minimum leverage and the risk-based capital requirements. The
following table presents the Bank's regulatory capital position at December 31,
1996.
Percent of
Regulatory
Amount Assets(1)
------ ---------
(Dollars in thousands)
Tangible capital $42,342 5.54 %
Tangible capital requirement 11,454 1.50
------- -----
Excess $30,888 4.04 %
======= ====
Core capital $42,592 5.58 %
Core capital requirement(2) 30,545 4.00
------- ----
Excess $12,047 1.58 %
======= ====
Risk-based capital $45,761 8.46 %
Risk-based capital requirement 43,274 8.00
------- ----
Excess $ 2,487 0.46 %
======= ====
(1) Represents the percentage of adjusted total assets for tangible
and core capital purposes and the percentage of risk-weighted assets
for risk-based capital purposes.
(2) The "prompt corrective action" regulatory scheme (See "-Prompt
Corrective Action") has effectively raised the leverage requirement to
4% for all but the most highly-rated institutions since an institution
is considered "undercapitalized" for such purposes if, among other
things, it has a leverage ratio of under 4% (3% for MACRO 1 rated
institutions).
Prompt Corrective Action. Banks and savings associations are
classified into one of five categories based upon capital adequacy, ranging from
"well-capitalized" to "critically undercapitalized" and require (subject to
certain exceptions) the appropriate federal banking agency to take prompt
corrective action with respect to an institution which becomes
"undercapitalized" and to take additional actions if the institution becomes
"significantly undercapitalized" or "critically undercapitalized."
The federal banking agencies have issued a joint rule for this purpose
under which, in general, an institution is: "well capitalized" if it has total
risk-based capital of 10% or greater, Tier 1 risk-based capital of 6% or
greater, leverage ratio of 5% or greater, and is not subject to an order or
other supervisory directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for
any capital measure; "adequately capitalized" if it has total risk-based capital
of 8% or greater, Tier 1 risk-based capital of 4% or greater, and leverage ratio
of 4% or greater (3% or greater if rated Composite 1 under the MACRO rating
system); "undercapitalized" if it has total risk-based capital of less than 8%,
Tier 1 risk-based capital of less than 4%, or a leverage ratio of less than 4%
(3% if rated
28
29
Composite 1 under the MACRO rating system); "significantly undercapitalized" if
it has total risk-based capital of less than 6%, Tier 1 risk-based capital of
less than 3%, or a leverage ratio of less than 3%; and "critically
undercapitalized" if it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets equal to
or less than 2%. Based on these requirements, the Bank is an "adequately
capitalized" institution.
The appropriate federal banking agency has the authority to
reclassify, a well-capitalized institution as adequately capitalized, and to
treat an adequately capitalized or undercapitalized institution as if it were in
the next lower capital category, if it is determined, after notice and an
opportunity for a hearing, to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or to have
received and not corrected a less-than-satisfactory rating for any of the
categories of asset quality, management, earnings or liquidity in its most
recent examination. As a result of such reclassification or determination, the
appropriate federal banking agency may require an adequately capitalized or
under-capitalized institution to comply with certain mandatory and discretionary
supervisory actions. A significantly undercapitalized savings association may
not be reclassified, however, as critically undercapitalized.
Restrictions on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions. Savings
association subsidiaries of holding companies generally are required to provide
their OTS District Director not less than thirty days' advance notice of any
proposed declaration of a dividend on the association's stock. Any dividend
declared within the notice period, or without giving the prescribed notice, is
invalid.
OTS regulations impose limitations upon certain "capital
distributions" by savings associations, including cash dividends, payments to
repurchase or otherwise acquire an association's shares, payments to
shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger and other distributions
charged against capital. The regulation establishes a three-tiered system of
regulation, with the greatest flexibility being afforded to well-capitalized
associations.
An association that has capital immediately prior to, and on a pro
forma basis after giving effect to, a proposed capital distribution that is at
least equal to its fully phased-in capital requirement is considered a Tier 1
institution ("Tier 1 Institution"). An association that has capital immediately
prior to, and on a pro forma basis after giving effect to, a proposed capital
distribution that is at least equal to its minimum regulatory capital
requirement but less than its fully phased-in capital requirement, is considered
a Tier 2 institution ("Tier 2 Institution"). An association that does not meet
its minimum regulatory capital requirement immediately prior to, or on a pro
forma basis after giving effect to, a proposed capital distribution is
considered a Tier 3 institution ("Tier 3 Institution"). The OTS retains
discretion to treat a Tier 1 Institution as a Tier 2 or Tier 3 Institution if
the OTS determines that the institution is in need of more than normal
supervision and has provided the institution with notice to that effect.
A Tier 1 Institution may, after prior notice but without the approval
of the OTS, make capital distributions during a calendar year up to the higher
of: (i) 100% of its net income to date during the calendar year plus the amount
that would reduce the association's "surplus capital ratio" (the excess over its
fully phased-in capital requirement) to one-half of its surplus capital ratio at
the beginning of the calendar year or (ii) 75% of its net income over the most
recent four-quarter period. Any additional capital distributions would require
prior regulatory non-objection. A Tier 2 Institution may, after prior notice but
without the approval of the OTS, make capital distributions in accordance with
the following schedule: if the association's capital satisfies the risk-based
capital standard applicable to the association as of January 1, 1993, the
association may make distributions up to 75% of its net income over the most
recent four-quarter period, and, if the associations's capital satisfies the
risk-based capital standard applicable as of January 1, 1991, it may make
distributions up to 50% of its net income over the most recent four-quarter
period. A Tier 3 Institution is not authorized under the regulation to make any
capital distributions unless it receives prior written approval from the OTS or
in accordance with the express terms of an approved capital plan.
The OTS retains the authority to prohibit any capital distribution
otherwise authorized under the regulation if the OTS determines that the capital
distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. The regulation also
states that the capital distribution limitations apply to direct and indirect
distributions to affiliates, including those occurring in connection with
corporate reorganizations.
Under the "prompt corrective action" provisions ( See "--Prompt
Corrective Action"), an FDIC-insured institution may not make a "capital
distribution" (which includes, among other things, cash dividends and stock
purchases) if, after making the distribution, the institution would be
"undercapitalized" for such purposes.
The OTS has proposed regulations that would revise the current capital
distribution restrictions. The proposal eliminates the current tiered structure
and the safe-harbor percentage limitations. In their current form, the proposed
regulations would not apply to the Bank as it is owned by a holding company.
Under the proposal, a savings association may make a capital distribution
without notice to the OTS provided that it has a MACRO 1 or 2 rating, is not in
troubled condition, and would remain adequately capitalized (as defined in the
OTS prompt corrective action regulations) following the proposed distribution.
Savings associations that would remain adequately capitalized following the
proposed distribution but do not meet the other noted requirements must notify
the OTS 30 days prior to declaring a capital distribution. The OTS stated it
will generally regard as permissible that amount of capital
29
30
distributions that do not exceed 50% of the institution's excess regulatory
capital plus net income to date during the calendar year. A savings association
may not make a capital distribution without prior approval of the OTS and the
FDIC if it is undercapitalized before, or as a result of, such a distribution. A
savings association will be considered in troubled condition if it has a MACRO
rating of 4 or 5, is subject to an enforcement action relating to its safety and
soundness or financial viability, or has been informed in writing by the OTS
that it is in troubled condition. As under the current rule, the OTS may object
to a capital distribution if it would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
No assurance may be given as to whether or in what form the regulations may be
adopted.
Liquidity. Federal regulations currently require savings associations
to maintain, for each calendar month, an average daily balance of liquid assets
(including cash, certain time deposits, bankers' acceptances, and specified
United States Government, state or federal agency obligations) equal to at least
5% of the average daily balance of its net withdrawable accounts plus short-term
borrowings during the preceding calendar month. This liquidity requirement may
be changed from time to time by the OTS to an amount within a range of 4% to 10%
of such accounts and borrowings depending upon economic conditions and the
deposit flows of savings associations. Federal regulations also require each
savings association to maintain, for each calendar month, an average daily
balance of short-term liquid assets (generally those having maturities of 12
months or less) equal to at least 1% of the average daily balance of its net
withdrawable accounts plus short-term borrowings during the preceding calendar
month. Monetary penalties may be imposed for failure to meet liquidity ratio
requirements. At December 31, 1996, the liquidity and short-term liquidity
ratios of the Bank were 5.52% and 2.71%, respectively, which exceeded the
applicable requirements.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. Pursuant to the Qualified Thrift Lender
("QTL") test, a savings institution must invest at least 65% of its portfolio
assets in "qualified thrift investments" on a monthly average basis on a rolling
12-month "look-back" basis. Portfolio assets are an institution's total assets
less goodwill and other intangible assets, the institution's business property,
and a limited amount of the institution's liquid assets.
A savings association's failure to remain a QTL may result in: (i)
limitations on new investments and activities; (ii) imposition of branching
restrictions; (iii) loss of FHLB borrowing privileges; and (iv) limitations on
the payment of dividends. If a savings institution that is a subsidiary of a
savings and loan holding company fails to regain QTL status within one year of
its loss of such status, the holding company must register as and will be deemed
to be a bank holding company subject to, among other things, the business
activity restrictions of the Bank Holding Company Act.
The Bank's qualified thrift investments were in excess of 73.6% of its
portfolio assets as of December 31, 1996.
Ohio Regulation. As a savings and loan association organized under the
laws of the State of Ohio, the Bank is subject to regulation by the Ohio
Division of Financial Institutions (the "Division"). Regulation by the Division
affects the Bank's internal organization as well as its savings, mortgage
lending, and other investment activities. Periodic examinations by the Division
are usually conducted on a joint basis with the OTS. Ohio law requires that the
Bank maintain federal deposit insurance as a condition of doing business.
Under Ohio law and regulations, an Ohio association may invest in
loans and interests in loans, secured or unsecured, of any type or amount
for any purpose, subject to certain requirements including but not limited to:
loans secured by liens on income-producing real estate may not exceed 20% of an
association's assets; all loans for educational purposes may not exceed 5% of an
association's assets; consumer loans, commercial paper and corporate debt
securities may not exceed 20% of an association's assets; and loans for
commercial, corporate, business or agricultural purposes may not exceed 10% of
an association's assets (subject to certain exceptions). In addition, no
association may make loans for the acquisition and development of undeveloped or
partially developed land for primarily residential use to one borrower in excess
of 2% of assets of the association. The total investment in commercial paper or
corporate debt of any issuer cannot exceed 1% of an association's assets, with
certain exceptions.
Ohio law authorizes Ohio-chartered associations to, among other
things: (i) invest up to 15% of assets in the capital stock, obligations and
other securities of service corporations organized under the laws of Ohio, and
an additional 20% of net worth may be invested in loans to majority owned
service corporations; (ii) invest up to 10% of assets in corporate equity
securities, bonds, debentures, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness; (iii)
exceed limits otherwise applicable to certain types of investments (other than
investments in service corporations) by between 3% and 10% of assets, depending
upon the level of the institution's permanent stock, general reserves, surplus
and undivided profits; and (iv) invest up to 15% of assets in any loans or
investments not otherwise specifically authorized or prohibited, subject to
authorization by the institutions's board of directors.
An Ohio association may invest in such real property or interests
therein as its board of directors deems necessary or convenient for the conduct
of the business of the association, but the amount so invested may not exceed
the net worth of the association at the time the investment is made.
Additionally, an association may invest an amount equal to 10% of its assets in
any
30
31
other real estate. This limitation does not apply, however, to real estate
acquired by foreclosure, conveyance in lieu of foreclosure or other legal
proceedings in relation to loan security interests.
Notwithstanding the above powers authorized under Ohio law and
regulation, a state-chartered savings association, such as the Bank, is subject
to certain limitations on its permitted activities and investments under federal
law which may restrict the ability of an Ohio-chartered association to engage in
activities and make investments otherwise authorized under Ohio law.
Ohio has adopted a statutory limitation on the acquisition of control
of an Ohio savings and loan association which requires the written approval of
the Division prior to the acquisition by any person or entity of a controlling
interest in an Ohio association. Control exists, for purposes of Ohio law, when
any person or entity, either directly or indirectly, or acting in concert with
one or more other persons or entities, owns, controls, holds with power to vote,
or holds proxies representing, 15% or more of the voting shares or rights of an
association, or controls in any manner the election or appointment of a majority
of the directors.
Under certain circumstances, interstate mergers and acquisitions
involving associations incorporated under Ohio law are permitted by Ohio law. A
savings and loan association or savings and loan holding company with its
principal place of business in another state may acquire a savings and loan
association or savings and loans holding company incorporated under Ohio law if
laws of such other state permit an Ohio savings and loan association or an Ohio
holding company reciprocal rights.
Ohio law requires prior written approval of the Ohio Superintendent of
a merger of an Ohio association with another savings and loan association or a
holding company affiliate.
FEDERAL AND STATE TAXATION
The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary
and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules
applicable to the Corporation or the Bank.
Savings associations such as the Bank are generally taxed in the same
manner as other corporations. For taxable years beginning prior to January 1,
1996, savings associations such as the Bank which met certain definitional tests
primarily relating to their assets and the nature of their supervision and
business operations ("qualifying thrifts") were permitted to establish a reserve
for bad debts and to make annual additions thereto, which additions may, within
specified formula limits, have been deducted in arriving at their taxable
income. The Bank's deduction with respect to "qualifying real property loans,"
which are generally loans secured by certain interests in real property, may
have been computed using an amount based on the Bank's actual loss experience,
or a percentage equal to 8% of the Bank's taxable income, computed with certain
modifications and reduced by the amount of any permitted additions to the
reserve for nonqualifying loans (the "percentage of taxable income method"). The
Bank's deduction with respect to nonqualifying loans was computed under the
experience method, which essentially allows a deduction based on the Bank's
actual loss experience over a period of several years. Each year the Bank
selected the most favorable way to calculate the deduction attributable to an
addition to the tax bad debt reserve.
Legislation enacted during 1996 repealed the existing reserve method
of accounting for bad debt reserves for tax years beginning after December 31,
1995. As a result, savings associations will no longer be able to calculate
their deduction for bad debts using the percentage of taxable income method.
Instead, savings associations will be required to compute their deduction based
on specific charge offs during the taxable year or, if the savings association
or its control group had assets of not more than $500 million, based on actual
loss experience over a period of years. This legislation also requires a savings
association (or its controlled group) with assets of more than $500 million to
recapture into income over a six-year period their post-1987 additions to their
bad debt tax reserves for qualifying real property loans and nonqualifying
loans, thereby generating additional tax liability. A savings association (or
its controlled group) with assets of not more than $500 million are required to
recapture their bad debt tax reserve to the extent it exceeds the greater of (i)
the applicable bad debt tax reserve as of the close of the last taxable year
beginning before January 1, 1988, or (ii) what the savings association's
applicable bad debt tax reserve would have been at the close of its last taxable
year beginning before January 1, 1996 under the experience method. At December
31, 1995, the Bank's post-1987 reserves totalled approximately $3.9 million. The
recapture may be suspended for up to two years if, during those years, the
savings association satisfies a residential loan requirement.
Under prior law, if the Bank failed to satisfy the qualifying thrift
definitional tests in any taxable year, it would be unable to make additions to
its bad debt reserve. Instead, the Bank would be required to deduct bad debts as
they occur and would additionally be required to recapture its bad debt reserve
deductions ratable over a multi-year period. At December 31, 1995, the Bank's
total bad debt reserve for tax purposes was approximately $6.8 million. Among
other things, the qualifying thrift definitional tests required the Bank to hold
at least 60% of its assets as "qualifying assets." Qualifying assets generally
include cash, obligations
31
32
of the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof, certain
obligations of a state or political subdivision thereof, loan secured by
interests in improved residential real property or by savings accounts, student
loans and property used by the Bank in the conduct of its banking business.
Under current law, a savings association will not be required to recapture its
pre-1988 bad debt reserves if it ceases to meet the qualifying thrift
definitional tests.
In addition to the regular income tax, corporations, including savings
associations such as the Bank, generally are subject to an alternative minimum
tax. An alternative minimum tax is imposed at a tax rate of 20% on alternative
minimum taxable income ("AMTI"), which is the sum of a corporation's regular
taxable income (with certain adjustments) and tax preference items, less any
available exemption. Adjustments and preferences include depreciation deductions
in excess of those allowable for alternative minimum tax purposes, tax-exempt
interest on most private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986 (reduced by
any related interest expense disallowed for regular tax purposes), and, for 1990
and succeeding years, 75% of the excess of adjusted current earnings ("ACE")
over AMTI. ACE equals pre-adjustment AMTI (i) increased or decreased by certain
ACE adjustments, which include tax-exempt interest on municipal bonds,
depreciation deductions in excess of those allowable for ACE purposes and, in
certain cases, the dividend received deduction, and (ii) determined without
regard to the ACE adjustment and the alternative tax net operating loss. The
alternative minimum tax is imposed to the extent it exceeds the corporation's
regular income tax, and alternative tax net operating losses can offset no more
than 90% of AMTI. The payment of alternative minimum tax will give rise to a
minimum tax credit which will be available with an indefinite carry forward
period to reduce federal income taxes in future years (but not below the level
of alternative minimum tax arising in each of the carry forward years). For
taxable years beginning after 1986 and before 1996, corporations, including
savings associations such as the Bank, are also subject to an environmental tax
equal to 0.12% of the excess of AMTI for the taxable year (determined without
regard to alternative tax net operating losses and the deduction for the
environmental tax) over $2 million.
Metropolitan, the Bank and other includable subsidiaries file
consolidated federal income tax returns on a December 31 calendar year basis
using the accrual method of accounting. Metropolitan, the Bank and other
includable subsidiaries have been audited by the Internal Revenue Service
through December 31, 1994.
The Bank is subject to the Ohio corporate franchise tax. As a
financial institution, the Bank computes its franchise tax based on its net
worth. Under this method, the Bank will compute its Ohio corporate franchise tax
by multiplying its net worth (as determined under generally accepted accounting
principles) as specifically adjusted pursuant to Ohio law, by the applicable tax
rate, which is currently 1.5%. As an Ohio-chartered savings and loan
association, the Bank also receives a credit against the franchise tax for a
portion of the state supervisory fees paid by it.
The Corporation is subject to an Ohio corporation franchise tax
payable in an amount equal to the greater of a specified percentage of net
income (currently 5.1% of the first $50,000 and 8.9% of the remainder, with an
additional add-on tax not to exceed $5,000) or a specified percentage of net
worth (currently approximately 0.6%, plus an add-on tax). In calculating net
income for this purpose, dividends from wholly-owned subsidiaries, such as the
Bank, would be excluded. In addition, in calculating net worth, the
Corporation's investment in the Bank would be excluded for this purpose.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Metropolitan's corporate headquarters, which is leased under a
long-term lease agreement, is located at 6001 Landerhaven Drive, Mayfield
Heights, Ohio 44124. The Bank operates fourteen branch locations, eight of which
are leased under long-term lease agreements with various parties. The other six
branches, located in Cleveland, Willoughby Hills, Mayfield Heights, Macedonia,
Cleveland Heights and Aurora, are owned by Metropolitan. In addition,
Metropolitan owns land in Twinsburg, Auburn, Stow, and land and a building in
Hudson, planned sites for future full service retail offices. The Bank also
leases office space for its loan production offices in Detroit, Cincinnati,
North Olmsted, Pittsburgh, and Strongsville.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Corporation is involved in various legal proceedings incidental to
the conduct of its business. The Corporation does not expect that any such
proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Corporation's financial
position or results of operations.
32
33
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY-HOLDERS
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Report,
the following actions were undertaken by the then sole shareholder of the
Corporation, Robert M. Kaye: 1) the authorization of a 3,125,635-for-one stock
split, the increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company to
10,000,000, and the creation of two classes of preferred stock, 2) the creation
of a classified Board of Directors with the number of directors between eight
and fourteen, and 3) the adoption of Amended and Restated Code of Regulations
containing defensive measures intended to prevent and discourage the acquisition
of the Company by a hostile party. These actions were undertaken October 22,
1996.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Metropolitan's Common Stock, no par value ("Common Stock"), the only
outstanding class of equity securities of Metropolitan is traded on the Nasdaq
National Market System. There are 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock authorized
and 3,525,635 shares issued and outstanding. The first day of trading in the
Corporation's Common Stock was October 29, 1996. Prior to this date no trading
occurred in the Corporation's Common Stock. During the fourth quarter of 1996
the price for the Corporation's Common Stock ranged from a high of $11 1/4 to a
low of $10 1/4.
Metropolitan paid no dividends during the past three years and has no
intention of paying dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms
of the 1993 Subordinated Notes, which mature December 31, 2001, prohibit the
Corporation from paying any cash dividend while the 1993 Subordinated Notes are
outstanding. The Indenture dated as of December 1, 1995 between the Corporation
and Boatmen's Trust Company covering the 1995 Subordinated Notes and the
Huntington Loan Agreement prohibit the Corporation from paying a dividend or
other distribution on its equity securities unless the Corporation's ratio of
tangible equity to total assets exceeds 7%.
The approximate numbers of record common shareholders at March 24,
1997 was 84. Robert M. Kaye, previously the sole shareholder controls 2,730,635
shares or 77.5% of the amount outstanding.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Information in response to this item is set forth on pages 3 and 4 of
the Corporation's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders which are incorporated
herein by reference.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Information in response to this item is set forth on pages 5 through
18 of the Corporation's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders which are
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The consolidated financial statements together with the report thereon
of Crowe Chizek & Company L.L.P., dated February 28, 1997, appearing on pages
20 through 47 of the Corporation's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders, are
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
None
33
34
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information required in response to this item is set forth in the
section captioned Election of Directors and Executive Officers who are not
Directors contained in the Corporation's definitive Proxy Statement for the
Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 20, 1997 and is incorporated herein by
reference. The Corporation expects to file its proxy statement on or about April
10, 1997.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required in response to this Item is set forth in the
sections captioned Board Meetings and Committees, Director Compensation,
Executive Compensation and Other Information, Compensation Committee, Report on
Executive Compensation and Performance Graph contained in the Corporation's
definitive Proxy Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
held May 20, 1997, and is incorporated herein by reference. The Corporation
expects to file its proxy statement on or about April 10, 1997.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required in response to this Item is set forth in the
sections captioned SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT and SECURITIES OWNERSHIP
OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS contained in the Corporation's definitive Proxy
Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 20, 1997,
and is incorporated herein by reference. The Corporation expects to file its
proxy statement on or about April 10, 1997.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required in response to this Item is set forth in the
sections captioned Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,
and Certain Transactions contained in the Corporation's definitive Proxy
Statement for the 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held May 20, 1997
and is incorporated herein by reference. The Corporation expects to file its
proxy statement on or about April 10, 1997.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits, financial statements, and financial statement schedules.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Financial statements Page No.*
----------------------- ---------
Report of Independent Auditors 20
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition 21
Consolidated Statements of Operations 22
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity 23
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 24
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 26
2. Financial Statement Schedules
--------------------------------
Parent Company Financial Statements 43
34
35
* Incorporated by reference from the indicated page of the
Corporation's 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders filed as
Exhibit 13 to this Form 10-K.
3. Exhibits
--------
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation of Metropolitan (filed as
Exhibit 2 to Metropolitan Form 8-A, filed
October 15, 1996 and incorporated herein by
reference).
3.2 Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of
Metropolitan (filed as Exhibit 3 to
Metropolitan's Form 8-A filed October 15,
1996 and incorporated herein by reference).
10 Commercial Real Estate Manager's Bonus Program **
13 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders
21 List of subsidiaries of Metropolitan (filed as
Exhibit 21 to Metropolitan's Form 10-K, filed March
28, 1996 and incorporated herein by reference).
24 Powers of Attorney.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
99.1 Specimen Subordinated Note relating to the
9 5/8% Subordinated Notes due January 1,
2005 (found at Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the
Form of Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Metropolitan's Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed
November 13, 1995 and incorporated herein by
reference).
99.2 Form of Indenture entered into December 1,
1995 between the Corporation and Boatmen's
Trust Company (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Metropolitan's Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed
November 13, 1995 and incorporated herein
by reference).
99.3 Specimen Subordinated Note relating to the
10% Subordinated Notes due December 31,
2001 filed as Exhibit 99.1 to
Metropolitan's Registration Statement on
Form S-1, filed October 20, 1995 and
incorporated herein by reference).
99.4 The Restated Loan Agreement by and between
the Huntington National Bank and the
Corporation dated as of October 16, 1996
(filed as Exhibit 99.4 to Metropolitan's
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
on Form S-1, filed October 18, 1996 and
incorporated herein by reference).
** Indicates that the exhibit is a management contract
or a compensatory plan or arrangement.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. No reports on Form 8-K were filed
by Metropolitan during the quarter ended December 31, 1996.
35
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 13 and 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
METROPOLITAN FINANCIAL CORP.
By: /s/ David G. Lodge
------------------------------
David G. Lodge,
President,
Assistant Secretary,
Assistant Treasurer, and Director
Date: March 31, 1997
--------------------------------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ David G. Lodge
------------------------------
David G. Lodge,
President,
Assistant Secretary,
Assistant Treasurer, and Director
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
Date: March 31, 1997
--------------------------------
Robert M. Kaye, Chairman of the Board and Director (Principal Executive
Officer); Malvin E. Bank, Secretary, Assistant Treasurer, and Director; David P.
Miller, Treasurer, Assistant Secretary and Director; Robert R. Broadbent,
Director; Marjorie M. Carlson, Director; Lois K. Goodman, Director; Marguerite
B. Humphrey, Director; Ralph D. Ketchum, Director.
By: /s/ David G. Lodge
-------------------------------
David G. Lodge
Attorney-in-Fact
Date: March 31, 1997
--------------------------------
36
37
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number Description Numbered Page
------ ----------- -------------
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of Metropolitan,
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Metropolitan's Registration Statement on Form S-1
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 20, 1995 (Registration No.33-98380), as
amended).
3.2 Code of Regulations of Metropolitan (in-
corporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
to Metropolitan's Registration Statement
on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on October 20, 1995
(Registration No. 33-98380),
as amended).
10 Commercial Real Estate Manager's Bonus Program.
13 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders.
21 List of subsidiaries of Metropolitan.
24 Powers of Attorney.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
99.1 Specimen Subordinated Note relating to the 9 5/8%
Subordinated Notes due January 1, 2005 (found at
Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the Form of Indenture filed
as Exhibit 4.1 to Metropolitan's Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed November
13, 1995 and incorporated herein by reference).
99.2 Form of Indenture entered into December 1, 1995
between the Corporation and Boatmen's Trust Company
(filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Metropolitan's Amendment No.
1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed
November 13, 1995 and incorporated herein by
reference).
99.3 Specimen Subordinated Note relating to the 10%
Subordinated Notes due December 31, 2001 filed as
Exhibit 99.1 to Metropolitan's Registration Statement
on Form S-1, filed October 20, 1995 and incorporated
herein by reference).
99.4 The Restated Loan Agreement by and between the
Huntington National Bank and the Corporation dated as
of October 16, 1996 (filed as Exhibit 99.4 to
Metropolitan's Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement on Form S-1, filed October 18, 1996 and
incorporated herein by reference).