Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark one) |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) |
|
|
|
|
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended: March 26, 2005 |
|
or |
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) |
|
|
|
|
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the transition period
from
to |
Commission File Number: 000-3905
Transcat, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
16-0874418 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
14624
(Zip Code) |
(585) 352-7777
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the
Act:
Common Stock, $0.50 par value per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock
held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on September 25,
2004 (the last business day of the registrants most
recently completed second quarter) was approximately
$18,323,000. The market value calculation was determined using
the closing sale price of the Registrants Common Stock on
September 25, 2004, as reported on the NASDAQ SmallCap
Market System.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of Common Stock of the Registrant
outstanding as of June 20, 2005 was 6,567,725.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III,
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, of this report, to
the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated by reference
from the Registrants definitive proxy statement relating
to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
August 16, 2005, which definitive proxy statement will be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) within 120 days after the end of the
fiscal year to which this report relates.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This report and, in particular, the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations section of this report, contains forward-looking
statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These include statements concerning
expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry,
management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat, we, us, or
our). Words such as anticipates,
expects, intends, plans,
believes, seeks, estimates,
and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are
difficult to forecast. Therefore, our actual results may
materially differ from those expressed or forecast in any such
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
INTRODUCTION
Transcat is a leading global distributor of professional grade
test, measurement, and calibration instruments and a provider of
calibration and repair services primarily throughout the
process, life science, and manufacturing industries. Our
reportable business segments offer different products and
services to the same customer base. We conduct our business
through two segments: Distribution Products and Calibration
Services.
Through our distribution products segment, we market and
distribute national and proprietary brand instruments to
approximately 12,000 global customers. Our catalog (Master
Catalog) offers access to more than 25,000 instruments,
including: calibrators, deadweight testers, temperature devices,
multimeters, oscilloscopes, pressure pumps, testers, recorders,
and related accessories, from nearly 250 of the industrys
leading manufacturers including Fluke, Hart Scientific, Agilent,
Ametek, Tektronix and GE-Druck. In addition, we are the
exclusive worldwide distributor for Altek and Transmation
products. The majority of the instrumentation we sell requires
expert calibration service to ensure that it maintains the most
exacting measurements.
Through our calibration services segment, we offer precise,
reliable, fast calibration services. We operate ten Calibration
Centers of Excellence strategically located across the United
States and Canada servicing approximately 8,000 customers. In
April 2005, we added an additional Calibration Center of
Excellence in Puerto Rico, primarily focused on expanding our
services to pharmaceutical customers in the region. To support
our customers calibration service needs, we deliver the
industrys highest quality calibration services and
repairs. Each of our calibration laboratories is ISO-9001:2000
registered with Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. and our
scope of accreditation to ISO/ IEC 17025 is the widest in the
industry for the market segments we serve. See Calibration
Services Segment Quality below in Item 1
for more information.
CalTrak®, our proprietary documentation and asset
management system, is used to manage the workflow at our
Calibration Centers of Excellence. Additionally, CalTrak®
provides calibration certificates, calibration data, and access
to other key documents required in the calibration process.
CalTrak® has been validated to 21CFR 820.75, which
substantiates the validation of our process. This validation is
especially significant in the life science industry, where
federal regulations are especially stringent. See CalTrak®
below in Item 1 for more information.
At Transcat, our attention to quality goes beyond the products
and services we deliver. Our sales teams and customer service
and support team stand ready to provide expert advice,
application assistance and technical support wherever and
whenever our customers need it.
Among our top 200 customers, representing approximately 34% of
our consolidated sales, are Fortune 500/ Global
500 companies, including Wyeth, Merck, DuPont, Exxon Mobil,
AK Steel Holding, Johnson & Johnson, Dow Chemical, and
Duke Energy. We believe these customers do business with us
because of our commitment to quality service, our CalTrak®
asset management system, and access to our product offerings.
3
Transcat has focused on the process and life science markets
since its founding in 1964. We are the leading seller of
calibrators into the process industry. We believe that our broad
product offering and our commitment to quality calibration
services is the foundation for deeper penetration into the
process and life science markets.
Transcats Internet website address is
www.transcat.com. The information contained on our
website is not a part of this Form 10-K. On our
investor relations Internet web page,
http://www.transcat.com/
AboutTranscat/InvestorRelations.asp, we post the following
filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are
electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,
current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those
reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All such filings
on our investor relations web page are available free of charge.
An Ohio corporation founded in 1964, we are headquartered in
Rochester, New York and employ more than 200 personnel. Our
executive offices are located at 35 Vantage Point Drive,
Rochester, New York 14624. Our telephone number is 585-352-7777.
We are an accredited provider of calibration services and a
distributor of test and measurement equipment. Our strategy is
to focus on gaining business and market share in markets where
companies value quality systems and/or operate in regulated
environments. We will differentiate ourselves and build barriers
to competitive entry by offering the best products and
calibration services and integrating the two to benefit our
customers operations and lower their cost.
We service our customers through two business segments:
Distribution Products and Calibration Services. We serve
approximately 16,000 customers with no customer or controlled
group of customers accounting for 5% or more of our consolidated
net sales from fiscal year 2003 to 2005. We are not dependent on
any single customer, the loss of which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet, or
results of operations. Note 8 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements in this Form 10-K presents financial information
for these segments.
We market and sell to our customers through multiple sales
channels consisting of direct catalog marketing, a direct field
sales organization, proactive outbound sales, and an inbound
call center. Our direct field sales team, outbound sales team,
and inbound sales team are each staffed with technically trained
personnel. Our domestic and international sales organization
covers territories in North America, Latin America, Europe,
Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. We concentrate on attracting
new customers and increasing product and calibration sales
(North America only) to existing customers. Sales efforts are
also focused on cross selling. Approximately 28% of our
customers utilize both segments of our business, which provides
us with an opportunity to increase our average revenue per
customer, adding to our value as a single source supplier. Our
sales to customers during the periods indicated were as follows
(calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States
|
|
|
84% |
|
|
|
84% |
|
|
|
84% |
|
Canada
|
|
|
9% |
|
|
|
9% |
|
|
|
9% |
|
Other International
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We focus primarily on the process, life science, and
manufacturing industries. Process manufacturing has been and
continues to be the foundation of our core business competency.
The process industry, in our definition, includes petroleum
refining, chemical, water treatment, industrial power, steel,
petrochemical, gas and pipeline, textile, pulp and paper, food
and dairy, and utility companies. The life science industry, in
our definition, includes
4
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, medical device
manufacturers, and healthcare service providers. The approximate
percentage of our business in these industry segments for our
largest customers is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Process
|
|
|
39% |
|
|
|
38% |
|
|
|
43% |
|
Life Science
|
|
|
19% |
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
19% |
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
12% |
|
|
|
11% |
|
|
|
11% |
|
Other
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
31% |
|
|
|
27% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTION PRODUCTS SEGMENT |
Summary. Our customers facilities in the
process, life science, and manufacturing industries use test,
measurement, and calibration equipment to calibrate and test
their processes and ensure that their processes and/or end
product(s) are within specification. Utilization of such
diagnostic equipment also allows for continuous improvement
processes to be in place, increasing the accuracies of their
measurements. The industrial distribution products industry for
test and measurement instrumentation, in the geographic markets
in which we predominately operate, is characterized by national
broad based distribution organizations and uniquely focused
organizations such as Transcat.
Most industrial customers find that maintaining an in-house
inventory of back-up test, measurement, and calibration
equipment is cost prohibitive due to the large number of stock
keeping units. As a result, the distribution of test and
measurement instrumentation has traditionally been characterized
by frequent, small quantity orders combined with a need for
rapid, reliable, and substantially complete order fulfillment.
The purchasing decision is generally made by plant engineers,
quality managers, or their purchasing function. Products are
generally purchased from more than one distributor.
The majority of our products are not consumables but are
purchased as replacement, upgrades, or for expansion of
manufacturing and research and development facilities. Our
catalog and sales activities are designed to maintain a constant
presence in front of the customer to ensure we receive the order
when they are ready to purchase. As a result, we evaluate sales
trends over at least a four quarter period as any individual
months sales can be impacted by any number of factors.
We believe that a distribution product customer chooses a
distributor based on a number of different criteria including
the timing and accurate delivery of orders, consistent product
quality, value added services, and price. Value added services
include providing technical support to insure our customer
receives the right product for his/her specific need through
application knowledge and product compatibility. We also provide
calibration of product purchases, on-line procurement, same day
shipment of products for in-stock items, a variety of custom
product offerings and training programs, and the operational
efficiency of dealing with one distributor for our customer
product needs.
Our distribution products segment accounted for approximately
67% of our revenue in our fiscal year ended March 26, 2005,
referred to as fiscal year 2005, which we anticipate declining
as a percentage of total sales as a result of the targeted
higher growth rates in calibration. Within the distribution
products segment, our routine business is comprised of customers
who place orders to acquire or to replace specific instruments,
which typically average $1,200 per order.
Marketing and Sales. Through our comprehensive
Master Catalog, supplemental catalogs, opt-in email newsletter,
and other direct sales and marketing programs, we offer our
customers a broad selection of highly recognized branded
products at competitive prices. Approximately 10,000 instruments
account for the majority of our sales. The instruments typically
range in price from $100 to over $5,000 for large calibration
test systems and are sold and marketed to approximately 12,000
customers in the process, life science, and manufacturing
markets.
During fiscal year 2005, we distributed approximately 890,000
pieces of direct marketing materials including catalogs,
brochures, supplements and other promotional materials to
approximately 50,000 customer
5
contacts and 525,000 potential customer contacts. The number of
catalogs and other direct marketing materials received by each
customer depends upon a number of factors, including purchase
history.
The majority of our product sales are derived from catalog
marketing. Our Master Catalog consists of approximately 700
pages of products relevant to the process, life science, and
manufacturing industries. We distribute our Master Catalog to
approximately 85,000 existing and prospective customers in the
United States and Canada approximately every 12 months. The
Master Catalog provides standard make/model and related
information and is also available in CD format upon
request and on-line at our website: www.transcat.com. Our
new customer acquisition program utilizes smaller catalog
supplements which feature new products, promotions,
or specific product categories. The catalog supplements are
launched at varying periods throughout the year; each
publication is mailed to over 250,000 targeted prospects.
The approximate percentage of our distribution products business
by industry segment for our largest customers is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Process
|
|
|
42% |
|
|
|
40% |
|
|
|
49% |
|
Life Science
|
|
|
12% |
|
|
|
15% |
|
|
|
15% |
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
8% |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
|
8% |
|
Other
|
|
|
38% |
|
|
|
38% |
|
|
|
28% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition. The markets we serve are highly
competitive. Competition for sales in distribution products is
quite fragmented and ranges from large national distributors and
manufacturers to small local distribution organizations and
service providers. Key competitive factors typically include
customer service and support, quality, turn around time,
inventory availability, product brand name, and price. To
address our customers needs for technical support and
product application assistance, and to differentiate ourselves
from competitors, we employ a staff of highly trained technical
application specialists. To maintain our competitive position
with respect to such products and services, we must continually
demonstrate our commitment to our customers and continue to
compete effectively in the areas described above.
Suppliers and Purchasing. We believe that
effective purchasing is a key element to maintaining and
enhancing our position as a provider of high quality test and
measurement equipment. We frequently evaluate our purchase
requirements and suppliers price offerings to obtain
products at the best possible cost. We obtain our products from
about 250 suppliers of brand name and private labeled equipment.
In fiscal year 2005 our top 10 vendors accounted for
approximately 70% of our aggregate business. Approximately 30%
of our product purchases on an annual basis are from Fluke
Electronics Corporation (Fluke), which is not
believed to be inconsistent with Flukes shares of the
markets the Company services.
We plan our product mix, including stocked and non-stocked
inventory items, to best serve the needs of our customers whose
individual purchases vary in size. We can ship our customers our
top selling products the same day they are ordered.
Operations. Our distribution operations take place
within an approximate 27,000 square foot facility located
in Rochester, New York. This location is our headquarters and
also houses the customer service, sales, and administrative
functions. Approximately 31,000 product orders are shipped from
this facility annually with an average order size in fiscal year
2005 of approximately $1,200 per order. This average is
slightly higher than recent years.
Distribution. We distribute our products in the
United States and internationally from our distribution center
in Rochester, New York. Customers in Canada are serviced from
our New York location as well as a re-distribution center in
Eastern Canada. We maintain appropriate inventory levels in
order to satisfy customer demand for prompt delivery and
complete order fulfillment of their product needs. These
inventory levels are managed on a daily basis with the aid of
our sophisticated purchasing and stock management information
system. Our automated freight manifesting and laser bar code
scanning facilitates prompt and accurate order fulfillment.
6
We ship our United States orders predominantly by a worldwide
express carrier. International orders are shipped by a number of
different carriers.
Distribution Agreement. In late calendar year
2001, we sold our manufacturing business, Transmation Products
Group (TPG), to Fluke. See footnote (2) under
Item 6. Selected Financial Data. In fiscal year 2002, we
entered into a distribution agreement (the Distribution
Agreement) with Fluke to be the exclusive worldwide
distributor of TPG products until December 31, 2006. Under
the Distribution Agreement, we also agreed to purchase a
pre-determined amount of inventory from Fluke.
On October 31, 2002, with an effective date of
September 1, 2002, we entered into a new distribution
agreement (the New Agreement) with Fluke, which
replaced the Distribution Agreement. The New Agreement ends on
December 31, 2006. Under the terms of the New Agreement,
among other items, we agreed to purchase a larger,
pre-determined amount of inventory across a broader array of
products and brands during each calendar year. Our purchases for
calendar years 2002 through 2004 met our commitment under the
New Agreement and we expect that our purchases for calendar year
2005 will also meet the commitment. We believe that this
commitment to future purchases is consistent with our business
needs and plans.
Backlog. Customer product orders include orders
for products that we routinely stock in our inventory, as well
as, customized products and other products ordered less
frequently, which we do not stock.
Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders, but also
include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to
be shipped complete, orders required to be shipped at a future
date, and orders on credit hold/awaiting letters of credit.
At the end of fiscal year 2005, the value of our unshippable
product orders was approximately $1.3 million, compared to
approximately $1.7 million and $1.4 million at the end
of fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively. During fiscal year
2005, the month-end level of unshippable product orders varied
between a low of $1.2 million and a high of
$1.8 million. This variation is due primarily to
seasonality, the economy, supplier delivery schedules, and
variations in customer ordering patterns.
The following graph shows the trend of unshippable product
orders and backorders for fiscal years 2004 through 2005, on a
quarterly basis.
|
|
|
CALIBRATION SERVICES SEGMENT |
Summary. Calibration is the act of comparing a
unit or instrument of unknown value to a standard of known value
and reporting the result in some rigorously defined form. After
the act of calibration has been completed, a decision is made,
again based on rigorously defined parameters, on what is to be
done to the unit. The decision may be to adjust, optimize,
repair, limit its use, range or rating, scrap the unit, or leave
as is. The purpose of calibration is to significantly reduce the
risk of product or process failures caused by inaccurate
measurements.
7
Transcats calibration strategy encompasses either one of
the two ways a company manages its calibration needs:
|
|
|
|
1) |
If a company wishes to outsource its calibration needs, an
Integrated Calibration Services Solution provides a
complete wrap-around service: |
|
|
|
|
|
Program management; |
|
|
Calibration; |
|
|
Logistics; and, |
|
|
Consultation services. |
|
|
|
|
2) |
If a company has an in-house calibration operation, we can
provide: |
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration of primary standards; |
|
|
Overflow capability either on-site or at one of our facilities
during periods of high demand; and, |
|
|
Consultation services. |
In either case, we intend to have the broadest calibration
offering to our targeted markets. This includes the broadest
scope of accreditation, certification of our technicians to the
American Society for Quality standards, complete calibration
management encompassing the entire metrology function, and
access to our products offering.
The billion-dollar commercial calibration services industry is
extremely fragmented with an estimated 750 companies
participating, ranging from national accredited organizations
such as Transcat to one-person organizations, in addition to
companies that do not currently outsource their calibrations.
Our typical customer is a technically based individual who is
employed in a quality, engineering, or manufacturing engineering
position.
The calibration services industry has its origins in the
military; approximately 60% of our calibration technicians and
laboratory managers have calibration expertise with the military
prior to joining Transcat.
Sourcing decisions are based on quality, customer service,
turn-around time, documentation, price, and a one-source
solution.
Our calibration services segment provides periodic calibration
and repair services for our customers test, measurement,
and diagnostic instruments. We perform over 100,000 calibrations
annually. These are performed at one of our ten Calibration
Centers of Excellence, or at the customers physical
location. Calibration services accounted for approximately 33%
of our total fiscal year 2005 revenue. During fiscal year 2006,
we anticipate that calibration services sales will increase at a
faster rate than product sales.
The calibration services segment of the market is critically
aligned with our strategic focus on quality accreditations. Our
calibration services are of the highest technical and quality
levels, with broad ranges of accreditation and registration. Our
quality systems are further detailed below in
Quality.
Marketing and Sales. Calibration allows for
maximum productivity and efficiency by assuring accurate,
reliable equipment and processes. Through our calibration
services segment, we perform periodic calibrations on new and
used equipment as well as repair services for our customers.
Each of our ten Calibration Centers of Excellence provides
accredited calibration in commonly used measurement parameters
including electrical, physical, and dimensional.
Our calibration services are provided to our customers with a
strategic focus in the highly regulated industries including
process, life science, and manufacturing. Our quality process
and standards are designed to meet the needs of companies that
are highly regulated (e.g., by the Food and Drug Administration,
or FDA), and/or have a strong commitment to quality
and a comprehensive calibration program.
8
The approximate percentage of our calibration services business
by industry segments for our largest customers for the periods
indicated was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Process
|
|
|
34% |
|
|
|
33% |
|
|
|
33% |
|
Life Science
|
|
|
34% |
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
26% |
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
19% |
|
|
|
18% |
|
|
|
16% |
|
Other
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
19% |
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition. The calibration outsource industry is
highly fragmented and is composed of companies ranging in size
from non-accredited, sole proprietorships to internationally
recognized and accredited corporations, such as Transcat,
resulting in a tremendous range of service levels and
capabilities. A large percentage of calibration companies are
small businesses that provide only basic measurements and
service markets in which quality requirements may not be as
demanding as the markets that we strategically target. Very few
of these companies are structured to compete on the same scale
and level of quality as us.
Quality. The accreditation process is the only
system currently in existence that assures measurement
competence. Each laboratory is audited and reviewed by outside
accreditation bodies proficient in the technical aspects of
calibration, metrology, and physics, ensuring that measurements
are properly made. Accreditation also requires that all
standards used for accredited measurements have a fully
documented path, known as the traceability chain, either
directly or through other accredited laboratories, back to the
national or international standard for that measurement
parameter. This ensures proper measurement techniques throughout
the process.
To ensure the quality and consistency of our calibrations to
customers, we have sought and achieved several national levels
of quality and accreditation. Our calibration laboratories are
ISO 9001:2000 registered with Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.
Our calibrations are also traceable to National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) or National Research
Council of Canada (NRC) standards. Our laboratories,
except those in Puerto Rico for which we expect to initiate the
accreditation process, are accredited by American Association
for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) to ISO/ IEC
17025 and ANSI/ NCSL Z540-1-1994, who provides an objective,
third party, and internationally accepted evaluation of the
quality and consistency of our calibration process and
competency.
To provide the widest range of service to our customers in our
target markets, our A2LA accreditations extend across a wide
range of technical disciplines, each requiring and meeting
separate and unique accreditation standards. The following table
represents Transcats capabilities (accredited and/or
non-accredited) for each Center of Excellence:
Working-level Capabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Metrology Disciplines | |
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
RF/ | |
|
Luminance/ | |
|
|
|
Chemical/ | |
|
Particle | |
|
|
|
Gas | |
|
|
DC/ACLF | |
|
HF/UHF | |
|
Microwave | |
|
Illuminance | |
|
Flow | |
|
Biological | |
|
Counters | |
|
Force | |
|
Analysis | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Boston
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
Dayton
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Ottawa
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
Rochester
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Juan, PR
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional | |
|
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines, Continued | |
|
Disciplines | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Relative | |
|
Mass | |
|
Pressure, | |
|
|
|
RPM, | |
|
Vibration, | |
|
|
|
|
Humidity | |
|
Weight | |
|
Vacuum | |
|
Temperature | |
|
Torque | |
|
Speed | |
|
Acceleration | |
|
Length | |
|
Optics | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Boston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
Dayton
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
Ottawa
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
Rochester
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
San Juan, PR
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference-level Capabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional | |
|
Electrical | |
|
Humidity | |
|
Mass | |
|
Pressure | |
|
Temperature | |
|
|
Standards | |
|
Standards | |
|
Standards | |
|
Standards | |
|
Standards | |
|
Standards | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Charlotte
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Rochester
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
CalTrak®. CalTrak® and CalTrak-Online is
our proprietary metrology management system that provides a
comprehensive calibration quality program. Many of our customers
have unique calibration service requirements to which we have
tailored specific services. CalTrak® allows our customers
to track calibration cycles via the Internet and provides the
customer with safe and secure off-site archive of calibration
records that can be accessed 24 hours a day. Access to
records data is managed through our secure password protected
website. Calibration assets are tracked with records that are
automatically cross-referenced to the equipment that was used to
calibrate. CalTrak® has also been validated to meet the
most stringent requirements within the industry.
CUSTOMER SERVICE AND
SUPPORT
Our breadth of distribution products and calibration services
along with our strong commitment to customer sales, service, and
support enable us to satisfy our customer needs through
convenient selection and ordering, rapid, accurate, and complete
order fulfillment and on-time delivery.
A key element of our customer service approach is our
technically trained direct field sales team, outbound sales
team, inbound sales team, and customer service organization.
Most customer orders are placed through our customer service
organization who often provides technical assistance to our
customers to facilitate the purchasing decision. To ensure the
quality of service provided, we frequently monitor our customer
service through customer surveys, interpersonal communication,
and daily statistical reports.
Customers may place orders by:
|
|
|
|
|
Mail at Transcat, Inc., 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, NY
14624; |
|
|
Fax at 1-800-395-0543; |
|
|
Telephone at 1-800-828-1470; |
|
|
Email at sales@transcat.com; or, |
|
|
Our website at www.transcat.com. |
INFORMATION REGARDING EXPORT
SALES
Approximately 16% of our sales in fiscal years 2005, 2004, and
2003, resulted from sales to customers outside the United States
(calculated on dollars in millions). Our percentage of foreign
sales is impacted by the
10
strength of the United States dollar in relation to other
currencies. When the United States dollar is stronger than
foreign currencies, we have historically had weaker foreign
sales.
In addition, our revenues are subject to the customary risks of
operating in an international environment, including the
potential imposition of trade or foreign exchange restrictions,
tariff and other tax increases, fluctuations in exchange rates
and unstable political situations, any one or more of which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash
flows, balance sheet or results of operations.
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
We utilize a basic software platform, Application Plus, to
manage our business and operations segments. We also utilize a
turnkey enterprise software solution. This software includes a
suite of fully integrated modules to manage our business
functions, including customer service, warehouse management,
inventory management, financial management, customer management,
and business intelligence. This solution is a fully mature
business package with over 20 years of refinement and
currently supports over 1,200 organizations to run their mission
critical operations.
SEASONALITY
We believe that our line of business has certain historical
seasonal factors. Our fiscal second quarter is generally weaker
and the fiscal fourth quarter historically stronger due to
typical industrial operating cycles.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
We believe that compliance with federal, state, or local
provisions relating to the protection of the environment will
not have any material effect on our capital expenditures,
earnings, or competitive position.
EMPLOYEES
At the end of fiscal year 2005, we had 209 employees, compared
to 213 and 222 employees at the end of fiscal years 2004 and
2003, respectively.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
executive officers and certain key employees as of
March 26, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Carl E. Sassano
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Charles P. Hadeed
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Vice
President of Finance |
John A. De Voldre
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources |
Robert C. Maddamma
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
Vice President of Customer Satisfaction |
Jay F. Woychick
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Vice President of Marketing |
Michael M. Mercurio
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Vice President of Sales |
Joanne B. Hand
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
Corporate Controller |
11
We lease the following properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate | |
Property |
|
Location |
|
Square Footage | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Corporate Headquarters and Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Rochester, NY |
|
|
27,250 |
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Boston, MA |
|
|
4,000 |
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Charlotte, NC |
|
|
4,860 |
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Philadelphia, NJ |
|
|
8,550 |
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Houston, TX |
|
|
4,645 |
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Los Angeles, CA |
|
|
3,060 |
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Ottawa, ON |
|
|
4,159 |
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
|
3,540 |
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
St. Louis, MO |
|
|
4,000 |
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Dayton, OH |
|
|
3,417 |
|
We also lease storage space in Chicago, Illinois and office
space in Shanghai, China. We added a calibration laboratory in
Puerto Rico in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 in which we
lease space. We believe that our properties are generally in
good condition, are well maintained, and are generally suitable
and adequate to carry on our business.
|
|
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
None.
|
|
ITEM 4. |
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
No matters were submitted to a vote of our stockholders during
the quarter ended March 26, 2005.
PART II.
|
|
ITEM 5. |
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market under
the symbol TRNS. As of March 26, 2005, we had
approximately 700 shareholders of record.
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON
STOCK
The following table sets forth, on a per share basis, for the
periods indicated, the high and low reported sales prices of our
Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market System
for each quarterly period in fiscal years 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter | |
|
Second Quarter | |
|
Third Quarter | |
|
Fourth Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal Year 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
$ |
3.05 |
|
|
$ |
3.38 |
|
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
Low
|
|
$ |
2.05 |
|
|
$ |
2.46 |
|
|
$ |
2.52 |
|
|
$ |
3.15 |
|
Fiscal Year 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
$ |
2.90 |
|
|
$ |
3.40 |
|
|
$ |
3.15 |
|
|
Low
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
DIVIDENDS
We have not declared any cash dividends since our inception and
do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future.
12
|
|
ITEM 6. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The following table provides selected financial data for the
current fiscal year and the previous five fiscal years (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003(1) | |
|
FY 2002(2) | |
|
FY 2001(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
55,307 |
|
|
$ |
53,317 |
|
|
$ |
57,172 |
|
|
$ |
66,782 |
|
|
$ |
76,881 |
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
41,415 |
|
|
|
39,919 |
|
|
|
43,853 |
|
|
|
48,706 |
|
|
|
53,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
13,892 |
|
|
|
13,398 |
|
|
|
13,319 |
|
|
|
18,076 |
|
|
|
23,210 |
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
12,993 |
|
|
|
13,091 |
|
|
|
12,850 |
|
|
|
24,081 |
|
|
|
20,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
(6,005 |
) |
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
(7,231 |
) |
|
|
429 |
|
|
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting
Principle
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
|
(6,631 |
) |
|
|
513 |
|
|
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
(4,715 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,631 |
) |
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in
Accounting Principle
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(1.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
Basic Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,396 |
|
|
|
6,252 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
|
6,103 |
|
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share Before Cumulative Effect of a Change
in Accounting Principle
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
(1.08 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
|
6,103 |
|
|
|
6,030 |
|
|
Closing Price Per Share
|
|
$ |
3.80 |
|
|
$ |
2.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or For The Fiscal Years Ended March | |
|
|
| |
|
|
26, 2005 | |
|
27, 2004 | |
|
31, 2003(1) | |
|
31, 2002(2) | |
|
31, 2001(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Sheets and Working Capital Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
$ |
5,902 |
|
|
$ |
3,736 |
|
|
$ |
2,842 |
|
|
$ |
3,869 |
|
|
$ |
8,399 |
|
|
Properties, net
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
3,911 |
|
|
|
5,747 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,524 |
|
|
|
2,524 |
|
|
|
2,524 |
|
|
|
8,996 |
|
|
|
19,916 |
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
20,112 |
|
|
|
18,385 |
|
|
|
16,758 |
|
|
|
27,624 |
|
|
|
47,722 |
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
|
|
4,546 |
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
1,364 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
5,498 |
|
|
|
6,441 |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
6,817 |
|
|
|
9,104 |
|
|
Term Loan, current portion
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
3,980 |
|
|
Term Loan, less current portion
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
12,120 |
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
6,764 |
|
|
|
13,329 |
|
13
|
|
(1) |
In fiscal year 2003, we recorded a $6.5 million impairment
from the implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, as a change in accounting
principle. See Note 1 and Note 3 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for further disclosure. |
(2) |
On December 26, 2001, we sold TPG, which produces
instruments used to calibrate, measure, and test physical
parameters to Fluke for $11.0 million. On January 18,
2002, we completed the sale of our Measurement and Control unit
to Hughes Corporation for $2.9 million and reported a loss
of $4.5 million on the sale. |
|
|
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
RECLASSIFICATION OF
AMOUNTS
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal quarters
financial information have been made to conform with current
fiscal quarter presentation.
OVERVIEW
Operational Overview. We are a leading distributor
of professional grade test, measurement, and calibration
equipment and provider of nationally recognized and accredited
calibration services across a wide array of measurement
disciplines.
We operate our business through two reportable business segments
that offer different products and services to the same customer
base. Those two segments are Distribution Products and
Calibration Services.
In our distribution segment, our Master Catalog is widely
recognized by both original equipment manufacturers and
customers as the ultimate source for test and measurement
equipment. Additionally, because we specialize in test and
measurement equipment, as opposed to a wide array of industrial
products, our sales and customer service personnel can provide
value added technical assistance to our customers to assist them
in determining what product best meets their particular
application requirements.
Our strength in our calibration services segment is based upon
our wide range of disciplines and our investment in the quality
systems that are required in our targeted market segments. Our
services range from the calibration of a single unit to managing
a customers entire calibration program.
Our revenue in our distribution products segment can be heavily
impacted by changes in the economic environment. As industrial
customers increase or curtail capital and discretionary
spending, our product sales will typically be directly impacted.
Absent significant economic volatility, we do not see this
segment of our business as high growth. The majority of our
products are not consumables but are purchased as replacements,
upgrades, or for expansion of manufacturing and research and
development facilities. Year over year sales growth in any one
quarter can be impacted by a number of factors including the
addition of new product lines or channels of distribution.
We believe our calibration services segment offers considerable
growth opportunity and the potential for continuing revenue from
established customers from what is typically an annual
calibration cycle.
We evaluate sales growth in both of our business segments
against a four quarter trend analysis, not by analyzing any
single quarter.
Financial Overview. Our distribution products
segment benefited in fiscal year 2005 from a stronger economy;
and, year over year sales growth was stronger in the first half
of the year due to weaker prior year comparisons. Calibration
service sales continued to improve in comparison to the prior
year, as the year progressed, as our sales organization
identified and closed new business.
Our gross margin overall was consistent with the prior year. Our
distribution products segment gross margin declined
approximately four points over the first six months of the year,
compared to the prior year, as a result of prior year
initiatives of selling into new low margin market segments
increased promotional and pricing activity.
14
Over the last six months of fiscal year 2005 our product gross
profit increased approximately three points as we decreased our
use of promotional pricing in response to the strengthened
economy.
We are pleased with our consistent calibration services gross
profit margin resulting from our focus on expense control and
productivity improvements. Calibration sales growth offers
significant leverage on gross profit due to the relatively fixed
nature of a calibration laboratory cost structure, as evidenced
by our fourth quarter results.
|
|
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES |
Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies
to include a discussion of critical accounting principles or
methods used in the preparation of financial statements.
Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements includes a
complete discussion of the significant accounting policies and
methods used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements. A summary of our most critical accounting policies
follows:
Use of Estimates: The preparation of our
Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) requires that we make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but
not limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts and returns,
depreciable lives of assets, estimated lives of our Master
Catalog, and tax valuation allowances. Future events and their
effects cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly, our
accounting estimates require the exercise of judgment. The
accounting estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated
Financial Statements will change as new events occur, as more
experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained
and as our operating environment changes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
The following table summarizes the more significant charges in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations that require
management estimates, which are described below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Provision for doubtful accounts receivables and returns
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Amortization of Master Catalog costs
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Deferred tax valuation allowance provisions
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Changes in Estimates: In the ordinary course of
accounting for items discussed above, we make changes in
estimates as appropriate, and as we become aware of
circumstances surrounding those estimates. Such changes and
refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in
reported results of operations in the period in which the
changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed
in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition: Sales are recorded when
products are shipped or services are rendered to customers, as
we generally have no significant post delivery obligations. Our
prices are fixed and determinable, collection of the resulting
receivable is probable, and returns are reasonably estimated.
Provisions for customer returns are provided for in the period
the related sales are recorded based upon historical data. We
recognize the majority of our service revenue based upon when
the calibration or repair activity is performed then shipped
and/or delivered to the customer. Some of our service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which we recognize revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals.
Our shipments are generally free on board shipping point and our
customers are generally invoiced for freight, shipping, and
handling charges.
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable represent
receivables from customers in the ordinary course of business.
These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful
accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected
collectibility of accounts
15
receivable. We apply a specific formula to our accounts
receivable aging, which may be adjusted on a specific account
basis where the specific formula may not appropriately reserve
for loss exposure. After all attempts to collect a receivable
have failed, the receivable is written-off against the allowance
for doubtful accounts. The returns reserve is calculated based
upon the historical rate of returns applied to sales over a
specific timeframe. The returns reserve will increase or
decrease as a result of changes in the level of sales and/or the
historical rate of returns.
Inventories: Inventories consist of finished goods
and are valued at the lower of cost or market. Costs are
determined using the average cost method of inventory valuation.
Inventories are reduced by a reserve for items not saleable at
or above standard cost. We reserve specifically for certain
items of our inventory and, for other items, we apply a specific
loss factor, based on historical experience, to specific
categories of our inventory. We evaluate the adequacy of the
reserve on a regular basis.
Properties, Depreciation, and Amortization:
Properties are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is
computed primarily under the straight-line method with useful
lives of 3 to 10 years for the following major
classifications: machinery, equipment, software, and furniture
and fixtures. Properties determined to have no value are written
off at their then remaining net book value. We account for
software costs in accordance with Statement of Position
(FSP) No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs
of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal
Use. Leasehold improvements are amortized under the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life or the lease
term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance and repairs are expensed
as incurred. See Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements for further disclosure.
Goodwill: We estimate the fair value of our
reporting units in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Tangible Assets, using the fair
market value measurement requirement, rather than the
undiscounted cash flows approach. We test our goodwill for
impairment on an annual basis, or immediately if conditions
indicate that such impairment could exist. In the first quarter
of fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded an impairment from the
implementation of SFAS No. 142 as a $6.5 million
change in accounting principle based upon our determination of
the fair market value of the reporting units. The evaluation of
our reporting units on a fair value basis indicated that no
additional impairment existed as of March 26, 2005,
March 27, 2004, and March 31, 2003.
Deferred Catalog Costs: We amortize the cost of
each Master Catalog mailed over such catalogs estimated
productive life. We review response results from catalog
mailings on a continuous basis; and if warranted, modify the
period over which costs are recognized. We amortize the cost of
each Master Catalog over an eighteen month period and amortize
the cost of each catalog supplement over a three month period.
Total deferred catalog costs were $0.4 million at
March 26, 2005 and March 27, 2004.
Deferred Gain on TPG: As a result of certain post
divestiture commitments, we are unable to recognize the gain of
$1.5 million on the divestiture of TPG, which took place in
fiscal year 2002, until those commitments expire in fiscal year
2007. See Note 9 of our Consolidated Financial Statements
for further disclosure.
Deferred Taxes: We account for certain income and
expense items differently for financial reporting purposes than
for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes are provided
in recognition of these temporary differences. A valuation
allowance on deferred tax assets is provided for items for which
it is more likely than not that the benefit of such items will
not be realized, in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
SFAS No. 109 requires an assessment of both positive
and negative evidence when measuring the need for a deferred tax
valuation allowance. See Note 5 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for further disclosure.
Stock Options: We follow the provisions of
Accounting Practice Board (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which does
not require compensation costs related to stock options to be
recorded in net income, as all options granted under the stock
option plan had on exercise prices equal to the market value of
the underlying Common Stock at grant date. See Note 7 of
our Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements: We do not maintain
any off-balance sheet arrangements.
16
The following table sets forth, for the prior three fiscal
years, the components of our Consolidated Statements of
Operations (calculated on dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Gross Profit Percentage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
26.9 |
% |
|
Service Gross Profit
|
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
27.5 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
Total Gross Profit
|
|
|
25.1 |
% |
|
|
25.1 |
% |
|
|
23.3 |
% |
|
As a Percentage of Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
|
67.1 |
% |
|
|
66.4 |
% |
|
|
67.1 |
% |
|
Service Sales
|
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
33.6 |
% |
|
|
32.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse Expenses
|
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
|
Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting
Principle
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(11.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 26, 2005 COMPARED TO FISCAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 27, 2004 (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
Service
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
55.3 |
|
|
$ |
53.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $2.0 million, or 3.8% from fiscal year
2004 to 2005.
Our product sales results, which accounted for 67.1% of our
sales in fiscal year 2005 and 66.4% of our sales in fiscal year
2004, have positively reflected the impact of what we believe is
an improved year over year economy, and customer response to our
marketing programs. Our fiscal years 2005 and 2004 product sales
trend in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, is
as follows (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Product Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
(2.9 |
)% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
(22.4 |
)% |
|
|
(15.8 |
)% |
The following table provides the percent of net sales and
approximate gross profit percentage for significant product
distribution channels (calculated on dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Percent of | |
|
Gross | |
|
Percent of | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
Net Sales | |
|
Profit %(1) | |
|
Net Sales | |
|
Profit %(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Core
|
|
|
94.2 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
Government
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs. |
Customer product orders include orders for products that we
routinely stock in our inventory, as well as customized products
and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not
stock. Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders, but
also include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to
be shipped complete, orders required to be shipped at a future
date, and orders on credit hold and/or awaiting letters of
credit. Our total unshippable orders decreased by approximately
$0.4 million, or 23.5% from fiscal year 2004 to 2005. We
believe that the decrease is primarily attributed to our
suppliers shipping inventory to us on a more timely basis and
improvement in inventory demand planning. The following table
reflects our historical trend of product orders that are
unshippable at the end of each fiscal quarter and the percentage
of these orders that are backorders (calculated on dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total Unshippable Orders
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
% of Unshippable Orders that are Backorders
|
|
|
76.9 |
% |
|
|
76.9 |
% |
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
80.2 |
% |
|
|
85.7 |
% |
|
|
82.5 |
% |
|
|
83.6 |
% |
|
|
83.8 |
% |
Calibration services sales increased $0.3 million, or 1.7%,
from fiscal year 2004 to 2005. This increase, and in particular,
our year over year fourth quarter growth, is attributable to
both new customer acquisition and concerted customer service
efforts to retain existing customers. Within any quarter, there
is typically a netting of
18
new customers against existing customers whose calibrations may
not repeat for any number of factors. Among those factors are
the timing of customer periodic calibrations on equipment as
well as repair services, customer capital expenditure budgets,
and customer outsourcing decisions. The rate of change in our
2005 and 2004 calibration services sales in relation to the
prior fiscal year quarter is as follows (calculated on dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Calibration Service Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(2.3 |
)% |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(3.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Product
|
|
$ |
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
Service
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of net sales, remained constant at
25.1% in fiscal year 2005 in comparison to fiscal year 2004.
Product gross profit increased $0.3 million from the prior
fiscal year to the current fiscal year, however decreasing by
0.3 points. As is evidenced by the chart below, gross profit
ratios were impacted mid-fiscal year 2004 as a result of our
aggressive targeting of new channels of distribution that
typically do not support the margins of our core customer base
and an increased level of allowances to stimulate product sales.
In fiscal year 2005, as the business climate improved, we
targeted a reduction in those allowances. In addition, our
product gross profit ratio to sales can be impacted by a number
of factors that can impact quarterly and annual comparisons.
Among those factors are sales to certain channels that do not
support the margins of our core customer base, periodic rebates
on purchases and cooperative advertising received from suppliers
and reported as a reduction of cost of sales in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 02-16 (see
Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). The
following table reflects the quarterly historical trend of our
product gross profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on
dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Product GM %(1)
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
20.6 |
% |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
Other Income (Cost) %(2)
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
(0.5 |
)% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Gross Profit %
|
|
|
25.7 |
% |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs. |
|
(2) |
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight
billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Calibration service gross profit increased $0.2 million, or
0.6 points. This increase is a result of a modest increase in
service sales and improving laboratory efficiency. The following
table reflects the quarterly historical trend of our calibration
service gross profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on
dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Calibration Service Gross Profit
|
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
12.9 |
|
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 1.5%, from
fiscal year 2004 to 2005. In the current fiscal year, selling,
marketing, and warehouse expenses decreased $0.6 million
attributed to a reduction in selling payroll expenses and
related costs and more efficient product marketing initiatives.
Administrative expenses increased $0.4 primarily resulting from
the issuance of stock to certain officers and other compensation
costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense remained constant with the prior year as debt
levels and interest rates remained relatively unchanged. The
other expense increase in fiscal year 2005 was primarily
attributable to a net loss in Canadian currency transactions in
comparison to net gains in fiscal year 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, |
|
March 27, | |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
We have not recognized any provision for income taxes in fiscal
year 2005 as pretax income was offset by a reduction in our
deferred tax asset valuation reserve. When calculating income
tax expense or benefit, we recognize valuation allowances for
deferred tax assets, which may not be realized using a
more likely than not approach, which is more fully
described in Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The benefit for income taxes in fiscal year 2004 recognizes the
benefit derived from the utilization of net operating loss and
foreign tax credit carry backs.
20
|
|
|
FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 27, 2004 COMPARED TO FISCAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$ |
35.4 |
|
|
$ |
38.4 |
|
|
Service
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
53.3 |
|
|
$ |
57.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales decreased $3.9 million, or 6.8%, from fiscal year
2003 to 2004.
Our product sales results, which accounted for 66.4% of our
sales in fiscal year 2004 and 67.1% of our sales in fiscal year
2003, have positively reflected the impact of what we believe is
an improved economic outlook, targeted sales efforts in new
distribution channels, and customer response to our marketing
programs. Our product sales have improved (declined) in relation
to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, as follows (calculated
on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Product Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
(22.4 |
)% |
|
|
(15.8 |
)% |
The following table provides the percent of net sales and
approximate gross profit percentage for significant product
distribution channels (calculated on dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Percent of | |
|
Gross | |
|
Percent of | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
Net Sales | |
|
Profit %(1) | |
|
Net Sales | |
|
Profit %(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Core
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
98.9 |
% |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
Government
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs. |
Customer product orders include orders for products that we
routinely stock in our inventory, as well as, customized
products and other products ordered less frequently, which we do
not stock. Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders,
but also include products that are requested to be calibrated in
our calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required
to be shipped complete, orders required to be shipped at a
future date, and orders on credit hold and/or awaiting letters
of credit. Our total unshippable orders increased by
approximately $0.3 million, or 21.4% from fiscal year 2003
to 2004. We believe that the increase is primarily attributed to
the increase in sales order volume in the fiscal fourth quarter
and product order mix. The following table reflects our
historical trend of product orders that are unshippable at the
end of each fiscal quarter and the percentage of these orders
that are backorders (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total Unshippable Orders
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
% of Unshippable Orders that are Backorders
|
|
|
85.7 |
% |
|
|
82.5 |
% |
|
|
83.6 |
% |
|
|
83.8 |
% |
|
|
76.9 |
% |
|
|
82.0 |
% |
|
|
76.7 |
% |
|
|
78.0 |
% |
Calibration services sales declined $0.9 million, or 4.8%,
from fiscal year 2003 to 2004. The decline in calibration
service sales is primarily attributable to calibrations
previously conducted at three customer on site
21
(on-sites) locations that were not renewed by these
customers. We believe that such non-renewals resulted from,
among other things, factors, such as the adverse economic
circumstances in one such customers respective industry
(telecommunications) and corporate sourcing decisions. As
reported, our calibration service sales have declined in
relation to the prior fiscal year quarter as follows (calculated
on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Calibration Service Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(3.2 |
)% |
Excluding these on-sites, and inclusive of the consolidation of
four calibration laboratories into existing facilities in fiscal
year 2003, our calibration service sales increased 3.6% from
fiscal year 2003 to 2004 and have improved in relation to the
prior fiscal year quarter as follows (calculated on dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Calibration Service Growth
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
Service
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
13.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit increased as a percent of net sales from 23.3% in
fiscal year 2003 to 25.1% in fiscal year 2004. This increase is
solely attributable to the significant improvement in
calibration service gross profit, and was constrained by the
reduction in product gross profit.
Product gross profit decreased $1.8 million from the prior
fiscal year to the current fiscal year, or 2.8 points.
Contributing factors to this 2.8 point decrease included our
aggressive targeting of new channels of distribution that
typically do not support the margins of our core customer base
and an increased level of allowances to stimulate product sales.
Our product gross profit ratio to sales can be impacted by a
number of factors that can impact quarterly and annual
comparisons. Among those factors are sales to certain channels
that do not support the margins of our core customer base,
periodic rebates on purchases and cooperative advertising
received from suppliers and reported as a reduction of cost of
sales in accordance with EITF 02-16 (see Note 1 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements). The following table reflects
the quarterly historical trend of our product gross profit as a
percent of net sales (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Product Gross Profit
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
26.3 |
% |
Calibration service gross profit increased $1.9 million, or
11.4 points. This increase is a direct result of the laboratory
consolidation implemented in fiscal year 2003 and improving
laboratory efficiency. The following table reflects the
quarterly historical trend of our calibration service gross
profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Calibration Service Gross Profit
|
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
23.9 |
% |
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
14.9 |
% |
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
|
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $0.3 million, or 2.3%, from
fiscal year 2003 to 2004. Included in the current fiscal
years operating expenses are $0.1 million of
severance costs and a charge of $0.2 million to settle,
rather than further litigate, a lawsuit brought against us by
our former chief financial officer. In the prior fiscal year,
operating expenses included $0.3 million in severance costs
incurred as a result of certain employee terminations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Other Expense (Income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
Other (Income) Expense
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income recorded in the prior fiscal year was primarily the
net gain recognized as a result of the restructuring of our
senior debt and execution of our Revolving Credit and Loan
Agreement (the Credit Agreement) in November 2002.
Interest expense in fiscal year 2004 was reduced 33.3% from the
prior fiscal year as a result of lower debt levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
The benefit for income taxes recognizes the benefit derived from
the utilization of net operating loss and foreign tax credit
carry backs. We have not recognized any tax expense on income,
net of certain small state payments. When calculating income tax
expense or benefit, we recognize valuation allowances for
deferred tax assets, which may not be realized using a
more likely than not approach, which is more fully
described in Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Cumulative Effect of a
Change in Accounting Principle: In fiscal year 2003 we
recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $6.5 million upon
the adoption of SFAS No. 142.
23
|
|
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES |
Cash Flows. The following table is a summary of
our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Provided by (Used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
Operating Activities. Cash used in operating activities
was neutral for fiscal year 2005 and decreased $0.2 million
when compared to the $0.2 million of cash provided by
operating activities in fiscal year 2004. This change was
primarily comprised of a $0.6 million decrease in cash
provided by working capital, an increase of $0.5 million in
non-cash charges and a decrease in net income of
$0.1 million. Significant working capital fluctuations were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories/Accounts Payable: Our inventories increased
$1.3 million more in fiscal year 2005 than in fiscal year
2004 as our fourth quarter product sales were somewhat below our
expectations. A relatively modest increase in accounts payable
when compared to the prior year resulted in a significant
decline in our payables to inventory ratio, as the following
table illustrates (dollars in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
FY 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Inventory, net
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
Payables/ Inventory Ratio
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables: Our accounts receivable increased less from
fiscal year end 2004 to 2005 when compared to the increase from
fiscal year end 2003 to 2004, contributing $0.6 million to
working capital. Our collections of outstanding accounts
receivable, reflected in our days sales outstanding, as the
following table illustrates (dollars in millions) is excellent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal months
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
Accounts Receivable, net
|
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
Days Sales Outstanding (based on 60 days)
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reduction in income tax refunds receivable as refunds were
received. |
|
|
|
An increase in accrued compensation costs. |
Investing Activities. The $0.9 million and
$0.5 million of cash used in investing activities in fiscal
years 2005 and 2004, respectively, resulted from capital
expenditures, primarily for our calibration laboratories.
Financing Activities. Our debt has remained relatively
constant from March 27, 2004 to March 26, 2005, as the
table below illustrates (in millions). However, in conjunction
with our third amendment to our Credit Agreement, we entered
into a new term loan agreement, resulting in a reduction in our
line of credit. See Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information regarding our debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Term Debt
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.4 |
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Refinancing of Debt.
Description. On November 13, 2002, we entered into a
Credit Agreement with GMAC Business Credit, LCC
(GMAC). The Credit Agreement consisted of a term
loan, a revolving line of credit (LOC), and certain
material terms of which are as set forth below.
The Credit Agreement was amended on April 11, 2003 to
address certain non-material post closing conditions.
The Credit Agreement was further amended on July 22, 2004
(Second Amendment) to waive compliance with our
EBITDA covenant for the first quarter of fiscal year 2005,
permanently waive a requirement relating to an inactive
subsidiary that we had committed to dissolve by a specific date
(that has been subsequently dissolved), and increase the Credit
Agreement restriction on our Master Catalog spending.
We amended the Credit Agreement again on November 1, 2004
(Third Amendment). The Third Amendment consists of
two term notes, a LOC, a capital expenditure loan if certain
conditions are met, and certain material terms of which are as
set forth below. The Third Amendment also waived compliance with
our EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation
and amortization) covenant for the second quarter of fiscal year
2005 and extended the Credit Agreement expiration from
November 13, 2005 to October 31, 2007.
LOC. The Credit Agreement requires both a subjective
acceleration clause and a requirement to maintain a lock-box
arrangement. These requirements resulted in a short-term
classification of the LOC in accordance with EITF
No. 95-22, Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings
Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements that include both
a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a
Lock-Box Arrangement.
Covenants. The table below indicates our excess
(shortage) EBITDA percentage for the periods indicated. The
Second and Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement waived
compliance with the EBITDA covenant for the first and second
quarters of fiscal year 2005, respectively. The Third Amendment
also reduced the EBITDA requirement for the third and fourth
quarters of fiscal year 2005. We met our EBITDA covenant for the
fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 and expect to meet the
covenant on an on-going basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
Q4 | |
|
Q3 | |
|
Q2 | |
|
Q1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
% Excess (Shortage) EBITDA
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
Other Terms. We have pledged certain property and
fixtures in favor of GMAC, including inventory, equipment, and
accounts receivable as collateral security for the loans made
under the Credit Agreement.
See Note 4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information on our debt. See Item 7a for our
discussion of interest rates on our debt.
25
Contractual Obligations and Commercial
Commitments. The schedule below contains aggregated
information about contractual obligations and commercial
commitments that we must make future payments under for
contracts such as debt and lease agreements, purchase
arrangements, and various operating requirements (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Term Loan
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Capital Leases
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Unconditional Purchase Obligations (1)
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
|
$ |
12.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Relates to minimum inventory purchase commitment. Commitments
are an annual dollar amount based on calendar years. This table
estimates the commitment amount per fiscal year. See
Distribution Agreement above in Item 1 for
further information. |
|
|
|
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS |
FSP 109-2: In October 2004, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued FSP
109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign
Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004. FSP No. 109-2 provides guidance
under SFAS 109, with respect to recording the potential
impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on
enterprises income tax expense and deferred tax liability.
FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond
the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the
effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or
repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying
SFAS 109. FSP 109-2 has no effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 151: In November 2004, FASB issued
SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs an
amendment of ARB No. 43. This Statement amends
the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory
Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of
idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted
material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of ARB 43, Chapter 4,
previously stated that ... under some circumstances, items
such as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double
freight, and rehandling costs may be so abnormal as to require
treatment as current period charges... . This Statement
requires that those items be recognized as current-period
charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of
so abnormal. This Statement is the result of a
broader effort by the FASB to improve the comparability of
cross-border financial reporting by working with the
International Accounting Standards Board toward development of a
single set of high-quality accounting standards. This
clarification has no effect on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
SFAS 123R: On December 16, 2004, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R replaces
SFAS 123 and supersedes APB No. 25. SFAS 123, as
originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a
fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment
transactions with employees. However, SFAS 123 permitted
entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in APB
No. 25, as long as the footnotes to financial statements
disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable
fair-value-based method been used. SFAS 123R covers a wide
range of share-based compensation arrangements including share
options, restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share
appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.
SFAS 123R requires the cost of all share-based payment
transactions be recognized in the financial statements,
establishes fair value as the measurement objective and requires
entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement method in
accounting for share-based payment transactions. SFAS 123R
applies to all awards granted, modified, repurchased or
cancelled after July 1, 2005, and unvested portions of
previously issued and outstanding awards.
26
The SEC amended the effective date of SFAS 123R with a new
rule issued on April 14, 2005 to amend the compliance date
for SFAS 123R that allows companies to implement
SFAS 123R at the beginning of their next fiscal year,
instead of the next reporting period, that begins after
June 15, 2005, although early adoption is allowed.
SFAS 123R permits companies to adopt its requirements using
either a modified prospective method, or a
modified retrospective method. Under the
modified prospective method, compensation cost is
recognized in the financial statements beginning with the
effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for
all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on
the requirements of SFAS 123 for all unvested awards
granted prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R. Under the
modified retrospective method, the requirements are
the same as under the modified prospective method,
but also permits entities to restate financial statements of
previous periods based on proforma disclosures made in
accordance with SFAS 123.
The Company currently expects to adopt SFAS 123R effective
March 26, 2006; however, the Company has not yet determined
which of the aforementioned adoption methods it will use. The
Company has not changed any of the stock compensation plans as a
result of the impending adoption of SFAS 123R but maintains
the right to amend, suspend or terminate any plan at any time.
SFAS 153: On December 16, 2004, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary
Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for
Nonmonetary Transactions. The amendments made by
SFAS 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of
nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of
the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the
narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive
assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance.
Previously, Opinion 29 required that the accounting for an
exchange of a productive asset for a similar productive asset or
an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset
should be based on the recorded amount of the asset
relinquished. The Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset
exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after
June 15, 2005. The Company currently expects to adopt
SFAS 153 effective on July 1, 2005 and does not expect
that the adoption will have an effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
We have a stock option program that is a broad based, long-term
retention program intended to attract, incent, and retain key
employees, thereby aligning stockholder and employee interests.
In granting options, we are cognizant of balancing the
plans objectives with potential incremental dilution.
Stock options are currently outstanding under two plans. Under
these plans, participants may be granted options to purchase
shares of our Common Stock at the fair market value at the time
of the grant.
The first plan, the Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock
Option Plan, had been approved by shareholders and terminated in
the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. Options granted under
that plan expired no later than five years from the date of the
grant and vest within four years, in equal increments. For the
first four years after the grant date, options are exercisable
only if our stock price attains a specific market value for a
minimum specified number of trading days and certain stock
ownership requirements are met. After four years, the stock
price and duration requirements cease. No options were granted
in fiscal year 2004 under this plan.
The second plan, the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, was
approved by shareholders in August 2003 and will terminate in
June 2013. Options granted under this plan expire no later than
ten years from the date of the grant and vest equally over a
three-year period. This plan also provides for the granting of
stock awards and performance awards.
Options granted to employees, including officers are summarized
for the fiscal years 2001 to 2005 as follows (shares in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
FY 2002 | |
|
FY 2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total Options Granted
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
Less: Options Forfeited
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
(587 |
) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Options Granted
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(532 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
The following table provides additional information regarding
stock options, and options granted and/or held by our Corporate
Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
FY 2002 | |
|
FY 2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total Options Granted as a % of Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Total Options Outstanding as a % of Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
Options Granted to Corporate Officers as a % of Total Options
Granted
|
|
|
34.9 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Options Granted to Corporate Officers as a % of Total Shares
Outstanding
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Cumulative Options Held by Corporate Officers as a % of Total
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
55.2 |
% |
|
|
44.5 |
% |
|
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
62.4 |
% |
|
|
74.5 |
% |
Cumulative Options Held by Corporate Officers as a % of Total
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
In-the-money and out-of-the-money (have an exercise price equal
to or above $3.80 per share, the market price of Transcat
Common Stock at March 26, 2005) option information as of
March 26, 2005 is as follows (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
of | |
|
Life (in | |
|
Price Per | |
|
of | |
|
Life (in | |
|
Price Per | |
|
of | |
|
Life (in | |
|
Price Per | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Years) | |
|
Share | |
|
Shares | |
|
Years) | |
|
Share | |
|
Shares | |
|
Years) | |
|
Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In-the-Money
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
Out-of-the-Money
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted to our Corporate Officers as a group during
fiscal year 2005 are as follows (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realization | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at Assumed | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Appreciation | |
Number of Securities |
|
% of Total | |
|
Range of | |
|
|
|
For Option Term(1) | |
Underlying Option |
|
Options Granted | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
Grants |
|
to Employees | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Date | |
|
10% | |
|
25% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
30
|
|
|
34.9% |
|
|
$ |
2.89 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
$ |
97 |
|
|
$ |
261 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents gains that could accrue for these options, assuming
that the market price of Transcat stock appreciates over a
5 year period at annualized rates of 10% and 25%. If the
stock price does not increase above the exercise price, the
realized value of these options would be zero. |
Our Corporate Officers did not exercise any options during
fiscal year 2005. The options held by these officers as a group
as of March 26, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Values of Unexercised | |
Unexercised Options | |
|
In-the-Money Options(2) | |
| |
|
| |
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
197 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
$ |
501 |
|
|
$ |
532 |
|
|
|
(2) |
These amounts represent the difference between the exercise
price and $3.80, the market price of our Common Stock at
March 26, 2005 for all in-the-money options held by the
listed officers. |
28
All stock option grants are reviewed and approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. All members of
the Compensation Committee are independent directors, as defined
in the applicable rules for issuers traded on The NASDAQ Stock
Market.
For additional information regarding stock option plan activity
for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003, see the reconciliation of
options outstanding in Note 7 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
For purposes of the reporting requirements of Section 16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, our CEO and CFO
are considered our only reporting persons.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE
PLAN
The Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan
(Plan) has up to 200,000 shares of our Common
Stock for issuance. Under the Plan, eligible employees may
purchase stock at 85% of the fair market value of our Common
Stock on the Investment Date, which is the second to last
business day of each calendar month. Purchases are limited under
certain circumstances to maintain Plan conformance to various
regulations. Plan participation was approximately 18% of total
employees, including those ineligible, during fiscal year 2005
and 19% and 22% during fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Shares purchased under the Plan were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
12,108 |
|
|
|
12,392 |
|
|
|
25,425 |
|
OUTLOOK
Fiscal year 2006 should continue the positive growth experienced
in the last half of fiscal year 2005. Revenue growth should be
in the high single digits, with gross margin improvement driven
by increased volume. Operating expenses are targeted to grow in
line with sales. Increases are planned in the following areas:
marketing for prospecting and promotion; employee training on
new products; customer satisfaction surveys; and infrastructure
investments, mainly information technology.
Operating earnings are targeted to increase as a result of gross
margin improvement and should increase as a percentage of sales.
Manpower increases and capital expenditures are devoted
primarily to calibration services and are tied to increased
volume or replacement/improvement of equipment.
Distribution products should grow in the low single digits in a
stable economy. Our growth in any quarter could be higher as a
result of our sales of new product lines added in late fiscal
year 2005 and early fiscal year 2006.
Calibration services revenues should grow in the high single
digits as more companies outsource their total calibration
management to Transcat. Growth in any quarter could be higher or
lower based on the timing and size of the new business.
As previously disclosed, we have had a valuation allowance on
our net deferred tax assets providing for items for which it is
more likely than not that the benefit of such items will not be
realized, in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 109. SFAS No. 109 requires an
assessment of both positive and negative evidence when measuring
the need for a deferred tax valuation allowance. The existence
of cumulative losses in the most recent three-year fiscal period
ending March 26, 2005 is sufficient negative evidence to
maintain the valuation allowance under the provisions of
SFAS No. 109. Our results over the most recent
three-year period were heavily affected by such charges as:
severance, restructuring, litigation, and directors
compensation expenses. Although we believe that the Company
today is much stronger, more profitable, and focused on
operating a sound, profitable business model, we must maintain a
valuation allowance until sufficient positive evidence exists to
support its reduction or reversal.
29
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK |
INTEREST RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from borrowing
activities. In the event interest rates were to move by 1%, our
yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by
approximately $0.1 million assuming our average-borrowing
levels remained constant. On March 26, 2005 and
March 27, 2004, we had no hedging arrangements in place to
limit our exposure to upward movements in interest rates.
Under the Third Amendment described in Note 4 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements, interest on the term loans
and LOC were fixed at Tier 2 (see chart below) as of March
2005. The prime rate and the 30-day London Interbank Offered
Rate (LIBOR) as of March 26, 2005 were 5.75% and
2.72%, respectively. Interest on the term loans and LOC after
March 2005, is adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon our
calculated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined in the Third
Amendment, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier |
|
Coverage Ratio |
|
Term Loan A |
|
Term Loan B |
|
LOC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1.249 or less |
|
(a) Prime Rate plus .50% or |
|
Prime Rate plus .75% |
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0% or |
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 3.25% |
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.75% |
|
2
|
|
1.25 to 1.49 |
|
(a) Prime Rate plus .25% or |
|
Prime Rate plus .50% |
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0% or |
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 3.00% |
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.50% |
|
3
|
|
1.50 or greater |
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0% or |
|
Prime Rate plus .25% |
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0% or |
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.75% |
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.25% |
Our interest rate for the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 will
be at Tier 3.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
Approximately 91% of our sales were denominated in United States
dollars with the remainder denominated in Canadian dollars for
the three months and twelve months ended March 26, 2005. A
10% change in the value of the Canadian dollar to the United
States dollar would impact our revenues by approximately 1%. We
monitor the relationship between the United States and Canadian
currencies on a continuous basis and adjust sales prices for
products and services sold in Canadian dollars as we believe to
be appropriate. On March 26, 2005 and March 27, 2004,
we had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to
foreign currency fluctuations.
RISK FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risks and all other
information included in this Form 10-K. The risks and
uncertainties described below and elsewhere in this
Form 10-K are not the only ones facing our business. If any
of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial
condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In that
case, the trading price of our common stock could fall and you
could lose all or part of your investment.
General Economic Conditions. The electronic
instrumentation distribution industry is affected by changes in
economic conditions, which are outside our control. We cannot
assure you that economic slowdowns, adverse economic conditions
or cyclical trends in certain customer markets will not have a
material adverse effect on our operating results, financial
condition, or our ability to meet our commitments.
Dependence on Manufacturers. A significant amount
of our inventory purchases are made from one vendor group. Our
reliance on this vendor group leaves us vulnerable to having an
inadequate supply of required products, price increases, late
deliveries, and poor product quality. Like other distributors in
our industry, we occasionally experience supply shortages and
are unable to purchase our desired volume of products. If we are
unable to enter into and maintain satisfactory distribution
arrangements with leading manufacturers, if we are unable to
maintain an adequate supply of products, or if manufacturers do
not regularly invest in, introduce to us, and/or make available
to us for distribution new products, our sales could suffer
considerably. Finally, we cannot provide any assurance that
particular products, or product lines, will be available to us,
or available in quantities
30
sufficient to meet customer demand. This is of particular
significance to our business because the products we sell are
often only available from one source. Any limits to product
access could materially and adversely affect our business.
Indebtedness. In November 2004, we entered a third
amendment to our existing agreement with our secured credit
facility. This amendment resulted in two additional term loans,
in addition to our revolving line of credit. As of
March 26, 2005, we owed $7.3 million to our secured
creditor. We are required to meet financial tests on a quarterly
basis and comply with other covenants customary in secured
financings. Although we believe that we will continue to be in
compliance with such covenants, if we do not remain in
compliance with such covenants, our lenders may demand immediate
repayment of amounts outstanding. Changes in interest rates may
have a significant effect on our monthly payment obligations and
operating results. Furthermore, we are dependent on credit from
manufacturers of our products to fund our inventory purchases.
If our debt burden increases to high levels, such manufacturers
may restrict our credit. Our cash requirements will depend on
numerous factors, including the rate of growth of our sales, the
timing and levels of products purchased, payment terms, and
credit limits from manufacturers, the timing and level of our
accounts receivable collections and our ability to manage our
business profitably. Our ability to satisfy our existing
obligations, whether or not under our secured credit facility,
will depend upon our future operating performance, which may be
impacted by prevailing economic conditions and financial,
business, and other factors described in this Form 10-K,
many of which are beyond our control.
If Existing Shareholders Sell Large Numbers Of Shares Of
Our Common Stock, Our Stock Price Could Decline. The
market price of our Common Stock could decline as a result of
sales by our existing shareholders or holders of stock options
of a large number of shares of our Common Stock in the public
market or the perception that these sales could occur.
Our Stock Price Has Been, And May Continue To Be,
Volatile. The stock market from time to time, has
experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are
both related and unrelated to the operating performance of
companies. As our stock may be affected by market volatility, as
well as by our own performance, the following factors, among
others, may have a significant effect on the market price of our
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Developments in our relationships with current or future
manufacturers of products we distribute; |
|
|
Announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
commitments; |
|
|
Litigation or governmental proceedings or announcements
involving us or our industry; |
|
|
Economic and other external factors, such as disasters or other
crises; |
|
|
Sales of our Common Stock or other securities in the open market; |
|
|
Period-to-period fluctuations in our operating results; and |
|
|
Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations. |
We Expect That Our Quarterly Results Of Operations Will
Fluctuate. Such Fluctuation Could Cause Our Stock Price To
Decline. A large portion of our expenses for calibration
services, including expenses for facilities, equipment and
personnel, are relatively fixed, as is our commitment to
purchase a predetermined amount of inventory. Accordingly, if
revenues decline or do not grow as we anticipate, we may not be
able to correspondingly reduce our operating expenses in any
particular quarter. Our quarterly revenue and operating results
have fluctuated in the past and are likely to do so in the
future. If our operating results in some quarters fail to meet
the expectations of stock market analysts and investors, our
stock price would likely decline. Some of the factors that could
cause our revenue and operating results to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in industrial demand for products we sell and/or
services we provide; and |
|
|
Fluctuations in geographic conditions, including currency and
other economic conditions. |
If We Fail To Attract And Retain Qualified Personnel, We
May Not Be Able To Achieve Our Stated Corporate
Objectives. Our ability to manage our anticipated
growth, if realized, effectively depends on our ability to
attract and retain highly qualified executive officers and
technical personnel. If we fail to attract and retain qualified
individuals, we will not be able to achieve our stated corporate
objectives.
31
|
|
ITEM 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
33-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39-56 |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
32
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Transcat, Inc.
Rochester, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Transcat, Inc and its subsidiaries as of March 26, 2005 and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for the fiscal year
then ended. We have also audited the schedule listed in the
accompanying index for the fiscal year ended March 26,
2005. These financial statements and schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
schedule are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of
its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit
included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements and schedule, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements and schedule. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries at
March 26, 2005, and the results of their operations and
their cash flows for the fiscal year then ended, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
Also, in our opinion, the schedule presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein for the
fiscal year ended March 26, 2005.
BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York
May 17, 2005
33
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders of Transcat, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of
March 27, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income (loss), of cash flows and of
changes in stockholders equity for each of the two years
in the period ended March 27, 2004 present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position, results of operations
and cash flows of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries at
March 27, 2004 and for each of the two years in the period
ended March 27, 2004, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule
listed in the accompanying index for each of the two years in
the period ended March 27, 2004 presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein when read
in conjunction with the related consolidated financial
statements. These financial statements and financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, on April 1, 2002.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Rochester, New York
June 17, 2004
34
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Product Sales
|
|
$ |
37,086 |
|
|
$ |
35,423 |
|
|
$ |
38,359 |
|
Service Sales
|
|
|
18,221 |
|
|
|
17,894 |
|
|
|
18,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
55,307 |
|
|
|
53,317 |
|
|
|
57,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products Sold
|
|
|
28,307 |
|
|
|
26,948 |
|
|
|
28,033 |
|
Cost of Services Sold
|
|
|
13,108 |
|
|
|
12,971 |
|
|
|
15,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Products and Services Sold
|
|
|
41,415 |
|
|
|
39,919 |
|
|
|
43,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
13,892 |
|
|
|
13,398 |
|
|
|
13,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse Expenses
|
|
|
7,948 |
|
|
|
8,540 |
|
|
|
8,311 |
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
5,045 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
4,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
12,993 |
|
|
|
13,091 |
|
|
|
12,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,593 |
) |
Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(880 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes and Cumulative Effect of a Change in
Accounting Principle
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting
Principle
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
(4,715 |
) |
Other Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
(4,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
From Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding (in thousands)
|
|
|
6,396 |
|
|
|
6,252 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
From Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding (in thousands)
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
35
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $56
and $51 as of March 26, 2005 and March 27, 2004,
respectively
|
|
|
8,089 |
|
|
|
8,044 |
|
|
Other Receivables
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Finished Goods Inventory, net
|
|
|
5,902 |
|
|
|
3,736 |
|
|
Income Taxes Receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Deferred Charges
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
15,040 |
|
|
|
13,231 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
|
|
|
1,984 |
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
Capital Leases, net
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,524 |
|
|
|
2,524 |
|
Prepaid Expenses and Deferred Charges
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
20,112 |
|
|
$ |
18,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$ |
4,544 |
|
|
$ |
4,139 |
|
|
Accrued Payrolls, Commissions and Other
|
|
|
1,993 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Current Portion of Term Loan
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
Current Portion of Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
5,498 |
|
|
|
6,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
12,997 |
|
|
|
13,074 |
|
Term Loan, less current portion
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Capital Lease Obligations, less current portion
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Deferred Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
15,798 |
|
|
|
14,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per share,
30,000,000 shares authorized; 6,700,505 and
6,352,968 shares issued as of March 26, 2005 and
March 27, 2004, respectively; 6,453,241 and
6,233,610 shares outstanding as of March 26, 2005 and
March 27, 2004, respectively
|
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value
|
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
3,235 |
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
|
|
(2,702 |
) |
|
|
(2,958 |
) |
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost, 247,264 shares and
119,358 shares as of March 26, 2005 and March 27,
2004, respectively
|
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
(453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
3,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$ |
20,112 |
|
|
$ |
18,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
36
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
(4,715 |
) |
|
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting
Principle
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
1,757 |
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income Before Cumulative Effect of
a Change in Accounting Principle to Net Cash (Used in) Provided
by Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Disposal of Assets
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,593 |
) |
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
2,047 |
|
|
|
|
Provision for Doubtful Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
Provision for Returns
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
Provision for Slow Moving or Obsolete Inventory
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Revenue MAC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
Common Stock Expense
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Other Receivables
|
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
MAC Escrow and Holdback
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(2,179 |
) |
|
|
(914 |
) |
|
|
1,027 |
|
|
|
Income Taxes Receivable/ Payable
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
Prepaid Expenses, Deferred Charges, and Other
|
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
(2,602 |
) |
|
|
Accrued Payrolls, Commissions, and Other
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit, net
|
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
Payments on Term Loan
|
|
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
(666 |
) |
|
|
(8,333 |
) |
|
Proceeds from Term Loan Borrowings
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,113 |
|
|
Payments on Capital Leases
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
(1,131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash
|
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
Cash at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Period
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid (Received) from Interest and Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
$ |
645 |
|
|
Taxes Refunded
|
|
$ |
(144 |
) |
|
$ |
(872 |
) |
|
$ |
(319 |
) |
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Financing Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Warrants for Debt Retirement
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Expiration of Warrant from Debt Retirement
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Treasury Stock Acquired in Cashless Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
TRANSCAT, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accum- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Treasury Stock | |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
In | |
|
|
|
Un- | |
|
Compre- | |
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
$0.50 Par Value | |
|
Excess | |
|
|
|
earned | |
|
hensive | |
|
Accum- | |
|
at Cost | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
of Par | |
|
War- | |
|
Comp- | |
|
Gain | |
|
ulated | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Value | |
|
rants | |
|
ensation | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance as of March 31, 2002
|
|
|
6,122 |
|
|
$ |
3,120 |
|
|
$ |
3,019 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(326 |
) |
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
$ |
(453 |
) |
|
$ |
6,764 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Issuance of Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
518 |
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2003
|
|
|
6,177 |
|
|
$ |
3,148 |
|
|
$ |
3,031 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(235 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,311 |
) |
|
|
119 |
|
|
$ |
(453 |
) |
|
$ |
2,698 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 27, 2004
|
|
|
6,234 |
|
|
$ |
3,176 |
|
|
$ |
3,235 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,958 |
) |
|
|
119 |
|
|
$ |
(453 |
) |
|
$ |
3,428 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
318 |
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Amortization of Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
Expired Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 26, 2005
|
|
|
6,453 |
|
|
$ |
3,350 |
|
|
$ |
3,995 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
(2,702 |
) |
|
|
247 |
|
|
$ |
(838 |
) |
|
$ |
4,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
Note 1 |
Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies |
Description of Business: Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat or the Company) is a leading
distributor of professional grade test, measurement, and
calibration instruments and a provider of calibration and repair
services, primarily throughout the process, life science, and
manufacturing industries.
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial
statements of Transcat include the accounts of Transcat, Inc.
and all of the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of Transcats
Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) requires that the Company make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Significant estimates and assumptions are used for, but
not limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts and returns,
depreciable lives of assets, estimated lives of major catalogs
(Master Catalog), and tax valuation allowances.
Future events and their effects cannot be predicted with
certainty; accordingly, accounting estimates require the
exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used in the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements will change
as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as
additional information is obtained and as operating environment
changes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The following table summarizes the more significant charges in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations that require
management estimates, which are described below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Provision for doubtful accounts receivables and returns
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Amortization of Master Catalog costs
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
Deferred tax valuation allowance provisions
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Changes in Estimates: In the ordinary course of
accounting for items discussed above, Transcat makes changes in
estimates as appropriate, and as the Company becomes aware of
circumstances surrounding those estimates. Such changes and
refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in
reported results of operations in the period in which the
changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed
in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal Year: Until April 1, 2003, Transcat operated
within a conventional 52-week accounting fiscal year ending on
March 31 of each year. As of April 1, 2003, the
Company changed the fiscal year end from March 31 to a
52/53 week fiscal year end, ending the last Saturday in
March. As a result of this change, in a 52-week fiscal year,
each of the Companys four quarters is a 13-week period,
and the final month of each quarter is a 5-week period. This is
not deemed a change in the Companys fiscal year for
purposes of reporting subject to Rule 13a-10 or 15d-10, as
promulgated by the SEC, since the new fiscal year commenced with
the end of the old fiscal year. Transcat estimated the fiscal
year end change from March 31, 2004 to March 27, 2004
had an immaterial effect on the Consolidated Financial
Statements when compared to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for fiscal year 2003.
Revenue Recognition: Sales are recorded when products are
shipped or services are rendered to customers, as the Company
generally has no significant post delivery obligations. Prices
are fixed and determinable, collection of the resulting
receivable is probable, and returns are reasonably estimated.
Provisions
39
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for customer returns are provided for in the period the related
sales are recorded based upon historical data. The Company
recognizes the majority of service revenue based upon when the
calibration or repair activity is performed then shipped and/or
delivered to the customer. Some of the service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which the Company recognizes revenue in equal amounts at fixed
intervals. Shipments are generally free on board shipping point
and customers are generally invoiced for freight, shipping, and
handling charges.
Shipping and Handling Costs: Freight expense and direct
shipping costs are included in cost of sales. These costs were
approximately $1.3 million, $1.2 million, and
$1.7 million for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively. Direct handling costs, which primarily represent
direct compensation of employees who pick, pack, and otherwise
prepare, if necessary, merchandise for shipment to customers are
reflected in selling, marketing, and warehouse expenses. These
costs were approximately $0.3 million for fiscal years 2005
and 2004 and $0.2 million for fiscal year 2003.
Rebates: Rebates are based on a specified cumulative
level of purchases and are recorded as a reduction of cost of
sales as the milestone is achieved.
Cooperative Advertising Income: Effective in fiscal year
2004, Transcat applied the provisions of the Emerging Issues
Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received
from a Vendor which provides that cash consideration
received from a vendor by a reseller be reported as a reduction
of cost of sales as the related inventory is sold. Prior to the
Companys adoption of EITF No. 02-16 and
consistent with the Companys historical accounting
practices, the Company reported cooperating advertising income
as a reduction of advertising expense. The Company reclassified
cooperative advertising income in fiscal year 2003 to conform
with fiscal years 2004 and 2005.
Comprehensive Income: Transcat reports comprehensive
income under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income. Other comprehensive income is comprised of net
income (loss) and currency translation adjustments.
Currency Translation Adjustment: The accounts of
Transcats Canadian subsidiary are maintained in the local
currency and have been translated to United States dollars in
accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency
Translation. Accordingly, the amounts representing assets
and liabilities, except for long-term intercompany and equity,
have been translated at the period-end rates of exchange and
related revenue and expense accounts have been translated at
average rates of exchange during the period. Gains and losses
arising from translation of the Companys subsidiary
balance sheets into United States dollars are recorded directly
to the accumulated comprehensive income component of
stockholders equity.
Currency gains and losses on business transactions are included
in other expense (income) on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The net loss in fiscal year 2005 was
$0.1 million. The net gain in fiscal year 2004 was
$0.2 million. The currency gains and losses in fiscal year
2003 were not significant.
Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per share of Common
Stock are computed based on the weighted average number of
shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted
earnings per share of Common Stock reflect the assumed
conversion of dilutive stock options, warrants, and non-vested
restricted stock awards. In computing the per share effect of
assumed conversion, funds which would have been received from
the exercise of options, warrants, and non-vested restricted
stock are considered to have been used to purchase shares of
Common Stock at the average market prices during the period, and
the resulting net additional shares of Common Stock are included
in the calculation of average shares of Common Stock outstanding.
For fiscal year 2005, the net additional Common Stock
equivalents had no effect on the calculation of dilutive
earnings per share. For fiscal year 2004, the net additional
Common Stock equivalents had a $0.01 per share effect on
the calculation of dilutive earnings per share. For fiscal year
2003, the net additional Common Stock equivalents had no effect
on the calculation of dilutive earnings per share. The total
number of dilutive and
40
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
anti-dilutive Common Stock equivalents resulting from stock
options, warrants, and non-vested restricted stock are
summarized as follows (shares in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$ |
0.80-$2.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.80-$3.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.80-$8.50 |
|
|
Warrants
|
|
$ |
0.97-$2.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.97-$3.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.97-$3.75 |
|
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable represent
receivables from customers in the ordinary course of business.
These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for doubtful
accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the expected
collectibility of accounts receivable. Transcat applies a
specific formula to accounts receivable aging, which may be
adjusted on a specific account basis where the specific formula
may not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all
attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of
returns applied to sales over a specific timeframe. The returns
reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the
level of sales and/or the historical rate of returns.
Inventories: Inventories consist of finished goods and
are valued at the lower of cost or market. Costs are determined
using the average cost method of inventory valuation.
Inventories are reduced by a reserve for items not saleable at
or above standard cost. Transcat reserves specifically for
certain items of inventory and, for other items, the Company
applies a specific loss factor, based on historical experience,
to specific categories of inventory. The Company evaluates the
adequacy of the reserve on a regular basis.
Properties, Depreciation, and Amortization: Properties
are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is computed
primarily under the straight-line method with useful lives of 3
to 10 years for the following major classifications:
machinery, equipment, software, and furniture and fixtures.
Properties determined to have no value are written off at their
then remaining net book value. Transcat accounts for software
costs in accordance with Statement of Position (FSP)
No. 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. Leasehold
improvements are amortized under the straight-line method over
the estimated useful life or the lease term, whichever is
shorter. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. See
Note 2 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
disclosure.
Goodwill: Transcat estimates the fair value of the
Companys reporting units in accordance with
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Tangible
Assets, using the fair market value measurement
requirement, rather than the undiscounted cash flows approach.
See Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further disclosure.
Deferred Catalog Costs: Transcat amortizes the cost of
each Master Catalog mailed over such catalogs estimated
productive life. The Company reviews response results from
catalog mailings on a continuous basis; and if warranted, modify
the period over which costs are recognized. The Company
amortizes the cost of each Master Catalog over an eighteen month
period and amortizes the cost of each catalog supplement over a
three month period. Total deferred catalog costs in prepaid
expenses and deferred charges on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
were $0.4 million at March 26, 2005 and March 27,
2004.
41
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred Compensation: Previously, some of
Transcats directors had elected to defer receipt of their
non-discretionary awards of shares of Common Stock under the
Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan. Deferred shares
were expensed at the market value of Common Stock at the date of
award, and the associated liability is adjusted quarterly based
on the quarter end market price of Common Stock. Directors
voluntarily elected to cease deferring shares effective as of
April 1, 2003. The fair market value of those deferred
shares was $0.1 million at March 26, 2005 and
March 27, 2004.
In addition, the Company provides an annual benefit to a former
presidents spouse and former executive under the terms of
a deferred compensation agreement. The deferred compensation was
less than $0.1 million at March 26, 2005 and
$0.1 million at March 27, 2004.
Deferred Gain on TPG: As a result of certain post
divestiture commitments, Transcat was unable to recognize the
gain of $1.5 million on the divestiture of Transmation
Products Group (TPG), which took place in fiscal
year 2002, until those commitments expire in fiscal year 2007.
See Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further disclosure.
Deferred Taxes: Transcat accounts for certain income and
expense items differently for financial reporting purposes than
for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes are provided
in recognition of these temporary differences. A valuation
allowance on deferred tax assets is provided for items for which
it is more likely than not that the benefit of such items will
not be realized, in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
SFAS No. 109 requires an assessment of both positive
and negative evidence when measuring the need for a deferred tax
valuation allowance. See Note 5 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further disclosure.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Transcat has
determined the fair value of debt and other financial
instruments using available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, Accounts Receivables, and Accounts Payables: The carrying
amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash,
accounts receivables, and accounts payables approximate fair
value, due to their short-term nature. |
|
|
|
Debt: The carrying amount of debt under the Credit Agreement
approximates fair value due to variable interest rate pricing. |
Stock Options: Transcat follows the provisions of
Accounting Practice Board (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which does
not require compensation costs related to stock options to be
recorded in net income, as all options granted under the stock
option plan had exercise prices equal to the market value of the
underlying Common Stock at grant date.
To calculate the fair value of the options awarded, the Company
elected to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
(Pricing Model), which produced a weighted average
fair value of options granted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average fair value of options awarded
|
|
$ |
2.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
The following assumptions were used in the Pricing Model:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted average fair value of value of options life
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
|
10 years |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
Annualized volatility rate
|
|
|
76.9 |
% |
|
|
77.2 |
% |
|
|
92.7 |
% |
Weighted average risk-free rate of return
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Dividend Rate
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
42
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company elected to account for terminations when they occur
rather than include an attrition factor into the model.
Pro forma amounts are as follows (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Income (Loss), as reported
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
(4,715 |
) |
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in
reported net income, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
related tax effects
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
(4,920 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.76 |
) |
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding (in thousands)
|
|
|
6,396 |
|
|
|
6,252 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.76 |
) |
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.80 |
) |
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding (in thousands)
|
|
|
6,966 |
|
|
|
6,808 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
The effect of applying the SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation pro forma
disclosure provisions in the current year is not representative
of the effect on income for future years since each subsequent
year will reflect expense for additional vesting, additional
stock option grants, and updated assumptions.
See Note 7 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further disclosure.
Reclassification of Amounts: Certain reclassifications of
prior fiscal years financial information have been made to
conform with current fiscal years presentation.
New Accounting Pronouncements:
FSP 109-2: In October 2004, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued FSP
No. 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the
Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004. FSP No. 109-2 provides guidance
under SFAS 109, with respect to recording the potential
impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on
enterprises income tax expense and deferred tax liability.
FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time
beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate
the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or
repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying
SFAS 109. FSP 109-2 has no effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 151: In November 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs an
amendment of ARB No. 43. This Statement amends
the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4,
Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for
abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material (spoilage). Paragraph 5 of
ARB 43, Chapter 4, previously stated that
. . . under some circumstances, items such
as idle facility expense, excessive spoilage, double freight,
and rehandling costs may be so abnormal as to require treatment
as current period charges. . . . This
Statement requires that those items be recognized as
current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the
criterion of so abnormal. This Statement is the
result of a broader
43
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
effort by the FASB to improve the comparability of cross-border
financial reporting by working with the International Accounting
Standards Board toward development of a single set of
high-quality accounting standards. This clarification has no
effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 123R: On December 16, 2004, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment. SFAS 123R replaces
SFAS 123 and supersedes APB No. 25.
SFAS 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as
preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for
share-based payment transactions with employees. However,
SFAS 123 permitted entities the option of continuing to
apply the guidance in APB No. 25, as long as the footnotes
to financial statements disclosed what net income would have
been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used.
SFAS 123R covers a wide range of share-based compensation
arrangements including share options, restricted share plans,
performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and
employee share purchase plans. SFAS 123R requires the cost
of all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the
financial statements, establishes fair value as the measurement
objective and requires entities to apply a fair-value-based
measurement method in accounting for share-based payment
transactions.
The Securities and Exchange Commission amended the effective
date of SFAS 123R with a new rule issued on April 14,
2005 to amend the compliance date for SFAS 123R that allows
companies to implement SFAS 123R at the beginning of their
next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period, that
begins after June 15, 2005, although early adoption is
allowed. SFAS 123R permits companies to adopt its
requirements using either a modified prospective
method, or a modified retrospective method. Under
the modified prospective method, compensation cost
is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the
effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for
all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on
the requirements of SFAS 123 for all unvested awards
granted prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R. Under the
modified retrospective method, the requirements are
the same as under the modified prospective method,
but also permits entities to restate financial statements of
previous periods based on proforma disclosures made in
accordance with SFAS 123.
The Company currently expects to adopt SFAS 123R effective
March 26, 2006; however, the Company has not yet determined
which of the aforementioned adoption methods it will use. The
Company has not changed any of the stock compensation plans as a
result of the impending adoption of SFAS 123R but maintains
the right to amend, suspend or terminate any plan at any time.
SFAS 153: On December 16, 2004, the FASB
issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary
Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for
Nonmonetary Transactions (SFAS 153). The
amendments made by SFAS 153 are based on the principle that
exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the
fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments
eliminate the narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of
similar productive assets and replace it with a broader
exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have
commercial substance. Previously, Opinion 29 required that
the accounting for an exchange of a productive asset for a
similar productive asset or an equivalent interest in the same
or similar productive asset should be based on the recorded
amount of the asset relinquished. The Statement is effective for
nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods
beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company currently
expects to adopt SFAS 153 effective on July 1, 2005
and does not expect that the adoption will have an effect on its
consolidated financial statements.
44
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Properties consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
$ |
10,158 |
|
|
$ |
9,256 |
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties
|
|
$ |
11,656 |
|
|
$ |
10,751 |
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
(9,672 |
) |
|
|
(8,726 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties, net
|
|
$ |
1,984 |
|
|
$ |
2,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Leases consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 26, | |
|
March 27, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Capital Leases
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
Less: Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital Leases, net
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense amounted to
$1.0 million, $1.0 million, and $1.6 million in
fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or
immediately if conditions indicate that such impairment could
exist. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, the Company
recorded an impairment from the implementation of
SFAS No. 142 as a $6.5 million change in
accounting principle based upon the Companys determination
of the fair market value of the reporting units. The evaluation
of the Companys reporting units on a fair value basis
indicated that no additional impairment existed as of
March 26, 2005, March 27, 2004, and March 31,
2003.
Description. On November 13, 2002, Transcat
entered into a Revolving Credit and Loan Agreement (the
Credit Agreement) with GMAC Business Credit, LCC
(GMAC). The Credit Agreement consisted of a term
loan, a revolving line of credit (LOC), and certain
material terms of which are as set forth below.
The Credit Agreement was amended on April 11, 2003 to
address certain non-material post closing conditions.
The Credit Agreement was further amended on July 22, 2004
(Second Amendment) to waive compliance with an
EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization) covenant for the first quarter of fiscal year
2005, permanently waive a requirement relating to an inactive
subsidiary that the Company had committed to dissolve by a
specific date (that has been subsequently dissolved), and
increase the Credit Agreement restriction on Master Catalog
spending.
Transcat amended the Credit Agreement again on November 1,
2004 (Third Amendment). The Third Amendment consists
of two term notes, a LOC, a capital expenditure loan if certain
conditions are met, and certain material terms of which are as
set forth below. The Third Amendment also waived compliance with
the Companys EBITDA (earnings before interest, income
taxes, depreciation and amortization) covenant for the
45
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
second quarter of fiscal year 2005 and extended the Credit
Agreement expiration from November 13, 2005 to
October 31, 2007.
Term Loans. As of March 27, 2004, Transcat
had a term loan balance in the amount of $0.7 million in
favor of GMAC. This term loan required annual payments totaling
$0.5 million, payable in equal monthly installments,
commencing on December 1, 2002, and was repaid in full on
November 1, 2004.
Under the Third Amendment, the Company made two term loans, Term
Loan A and Term Loan B, in the amounts of
$1.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively. These
term notes require annual payments of $0.5 million and
$0.2 million, respectively, payable over three years in
equal monthly installments, commencing on December 1, 2004.
As of March 26, 2005, the Third Amendment requires the
Company to make the following principal payments on combined
term loans, before giving effect to any excess cash flow
payments to be made (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Giving Effect to Excess | |
|
|
Cash Flow Payments | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Term Loan A | |
|
Term Loan B | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal Year 2006
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
Fiscal Year 2008
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,333 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is further required to reduce the term loans on an
annual basis by a percentage of excess cash flow, as defined in
the Third Amendment. Term Loan B will be reduced by the
lesser of the balance owed on Term Loan B or 50% of the
Companys excess cash flow payable in three monthly
installments. Once Term Loan B has been repaid, the excess
cash flow payment required against Term Loan A is 20% of
the Companys excess cash flow, not to exceed
$0.2 million, annually. After giving effect to the excess
cash flow payments to be made attributable to excess cash flow
for fiscal year 2005 as required under the Third Amendment, the
following are the future combined term loan payments as of
March 26, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After Giving Effect to Excess | |
|
|
Cash Flow Payments | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Term Loan A | |
|
Term Loan B | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fiscal Year 2006
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
758 |
|
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
Fiscal Year 2008
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,333 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
$ |
1,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOC. Under the Third Amendment, the maximum amount
available under the LOC portion is $9.0 million. As of
March 26, 2005, the Company was eligible to borrow up to
$9.0 million based on assets and borrowed
$5.5 million. Availability under the LOC is determined by a
formula based on eligible accounts receivable (85%) and
inventory (50%).
The Credit Agreement requires both a subjective acceleration
clause and a requirement to maintain a lock-box arrangement.
These requirements resulted in a short-term classification of
the LOC in accordance with EITF No. 95-22, Balance
Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving
Credit Agreements that include both a Subjective Acceleration
Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement.
Interest. Under the Third Amendment, interest on
the term loans and LOC is fixed at Tier 2 (see chart below)
through March 2005. The prime rate and the 30-day London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as of March 26,
2005 were 5.75% and 2.86%, respectively. Interest on the term
loans and LOC after March 2005, is
46
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon the Companys
calculated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as defined in the Third
Amendment, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charge | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier | |
|
Coverage Ratio | |
|
Term Loan A | |
|
Term Loan B | |
|
LOC | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1.249 or less |
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus .50% or (b) LIBOR plus 3.25% |
|
|
Prime Rate plus .75% |
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0% or (b) LIBOR plus 2.75% |
|
2 |
|
|
|
1.25 to 1.49 |
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus .25% or (b) LIBOR plus 3.00% |
|
|
Prime Rate plus .50% |
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0% or (b) LIBOR plus 2.50% |
|
3 |
|
|
|
1.50 or greater |
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0% or (b) LIBOR plus 2.75% |
|
|
Prime Rate plus .25% |
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0% or (b) LIBOR plus 2.25% |
Covenants. The Credit Agreement has certain
covenants with which the Company has to comply, including a
minimum EBITDA covenant, as well as restrictions on capital
expenditures and Master Catalog spending. The Third Amendment
includes a revised EBITDA covenant, a fixed charge coverage
ratio covenant, as well as, revised restrictions on capital
expenditures and Master Catalog spending. As previously
indicated, the Third Amendment waived compliance with the
Companys EBITDA covenant for the second quarter of fiscal
year 2005. The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants
and requirements for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005.
Loan Costs. In accordance with EITF 98-14,
Debtors Accounting for Changes in Line-of-Credit or
Revolving-Debt Arrangements, any fees paid to GMAC, third
party costs associated with the LOC of the Third Amendment, and
unamortized costs remaining under the Credit Agreement, are
amortized over the term of the Third Amendment.
Other Terms. The Credit Agreement requires an
increase in the Companys borrowing rate of two percentage
points should an event of default occur and a termination
premium of 1% of the maximum available borrowing under the
revolving line of credit plus the then outstanding balance owed
under the term note if the Credit Agreement was terminated after
November 13, 2003 and prior to November 13, 2005.
Under the Third Amendment, if the agreement is terminated prior
to its expiration date of October 31, 2007, a termination
premium of 2% in year one, 1% in year two, and 0.5% in the third
year of the advance limit, as defined in the agreement, will be
incurred. The Third Amendment also reduced other certain
recurring loan costs and fees.
Additionally, the Company has pledged certain property and
fixtures in favor of GMAC, including inventory, equipment, and
accounts receivable as collateral security for the loans made
under the Credit Agreement.
The Third Amendment also provides for a capital expenditure loan
(Cap-x Loan). If prior to September 30, 2005,
the Company has achieved an EBITDA, as defined in the agreement,
of $2.4 million on a trailing twelve months basis, the
Company may make a Cap-x Loan of up to $1.0 million for
qualifying capital expenditures. As of March 26, 2005, the
Company has made this milestone, but has not borrowed any
additional monies. The Cap-x Loan would be payable in equal
monthly payments over a 36 month period with any residual
balance resulting in a balloon payment at October 31, 2007.
Interest is adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon the
Companys calculated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio with the
same terms as Term Loan A (see chart above).
47
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 5 Income Taxes
Transcats net income (loss) before income taxes and
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
United States
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
1,524 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
1,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provisions for income taxes determined in accordance with
SFAS No. 109 for fiscal years 2004, 2003, and 2002 are
comprised of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Federal
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(205 |
) |
|
$ |
(418 |
) |
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(192 |
) |
|
$ |
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table is a reconciliation of the
expected federal income tax provision computed by
applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate and
the income tax provision reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The reconciliation does not include
the $6.5 million goodwill impairment charge from the
implementation of SFAS No. 142 in fiscal year 2003.
The $6.5 million charge created a deferred tax asset of
$2.2 million, which is fully reserved for in the net
deferred tax assets valuation allowance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Computed Expected Federal Income Tax
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
State Income Taxes
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Book Expenses Not Deductible for Taxes
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(1,320 |
) |
Foreign Credits, Deductions, and Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
274 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(192 |
) |
|
$ |
(408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of the net deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforward (1)
|
|
$ |
714 |
|
|
$ |
484 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Reserves for Inventory Obsolescence
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
Gain on Sale of Business
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
1,921 |
|
|
|
2,282 |
|
|
Foreign Tax Credit (expires March 2008)
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
Valuation Allowance(2)
|
|
|
(3,802 |
) |
|
|
(3,793 |
) |
|
|
(3,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
Accelerated Catalog and Postage Write-offs
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
553 |
|
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As of March 26, 2005, Transcat has net operating loss
carryforwards of $1.8 million, which is available to offset
future federal taxable income through March 2025. |
|
(2) |
Deferred taxes recognize the impact of temporary differences
between the amounts of assets and liabilities recorded for
financial statement purposes and such amounts measured in
accordance with tax laws. In general, each deferred tax asset is
reviewed for expected utilization, using a more likely
than not approach, based on the character of the item
(credit, loss, etc.), the relevant history for the particular
item, the applicable expiration dates, operating projects that
would impact utilization, and identified actions under the
control of the Company in realizing the associated benefits.
Additionally, the Companys utilization of
U.S. foreign tax credit carryforwards is dependent on
related statutory limitations that involve numerous factors
beyond overall positive income, all of which have been taken
into account by the company in its evaluation. The Company
assesses the available positive and negative evidence
surrounding the recoverability of the deferred tax assets and
applies its judgment in estimating the amount of valuation
allowance necessary under the circumstances. For the years ended
March 26, 2005, March 27, 2004, and March 31,
2003 the Company has determined that it is more likely than not
that the benefits associated with the net deferred tax assets
will not be realized. Accordingly, the Company has booked a full
valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets. The
Company will continue to assess all available evidence, both
positive and negative, to determine whether it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will be realized. |
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis
differences related to the investments in the Companys
foreign subsidiary. These basis differences were approximately
$1.7 million at March 26, 2005 and consisted primarily
of undistributed earnings. These earnings are considered
permanently invested in the businesses. Determination of the
deferred income tax liability on these unremitted earnings is
not practicable because such liability, if any, is dependent on
circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs.
Note 6 Defined Contribution Plan
All of Transcats United States employees are eligible to
participate in a plan providing certain qualifications are met.
Effective April 1, 1981, the Deferred Profit Sharing Plan
was adopted. Effective April 1, 1987, this plan
49
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
was amended from a non-contributory to a contributory defined
contribution plan and renamed the Long-Term Savings and Deferred
Profit Sharing Plan (Plan).
In the Long-Term Savings portion of the Plan (401K),
payments of benefits accrued for plan participants are made upon
retirement or upon termination of employment prior to retirement
providing certain conditions have been met by the employee prior
to termination. The Companys matching contributions to the
401K were $0.2 million in each of the fiscal years 2005,
2004, and 2003.
In the Deferred Profit Sharing portion of the Plan, employer
contributions are made at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. The Company made no profit sharing contributions in
fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003.
Note 7 Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Options: In June 2003, the Company adopted the
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (2003 Plan) which
replaced the Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock
Option Plan (1993 Plan). The approximately
918,000 shares that were outstanding as of the termination
of the 1993 Plan were reserved under the 2003 Plan. The 2003
Plan grants options to officers and key employees to purchase
Common Stock at no less than the fair market value at the date
of grant. Options generally vest over a period up to four years
and expire up to ten years from the date of grant. The following
table summarizes the Companys options for fiscal years
2005, 2004, and 2003 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Weighted | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
of | |
|
Average | |
|
of | |
|
Average | |
|
of | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning of Year
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
$ |
2.85 |
|
Add (Deduct):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
|
(473 |
) |
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Year
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
1.65 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
1.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, End of Year
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
$ |
3.85 |
|
Available for Grant, End of Year
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company acquired
treasury stock from a cashless stock option exercise, in which,
a Board of Director immediately used shares acquired, by
exercising a portion of an option, to exercise the remaining
shares under the same option. As a result, the Company
recognized $0.1 million in compensation expense from the
difference in the market value and exercise value of the
immature shares in accordance with APB No. 25. This
transaction resulted in an increase to Common Stock of
0.1 million shares, $0.1 million, an increase to
Capital in Excess of Par Value of $0.5 million, and an
increase in Treasury Stock of 0.1 million shares, and
$0.4 million.
The following table presents options outstanding or exercisable
as of March 26, 2005 (shares in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
of | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Price per | |
|
of | |
|
Price per | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Life (in Years) | |
|
Share | |
|
Shares | |
|
Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Range of Exercise Prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.80-$1.94
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$2.00-$3.00
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
$ |
1.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Warrants: Under the Directors Warrant Plan, as
amended, warrants may be granted to non-employee directors to
purchase Common Stock at the fair market value at the date of
grant. Warrants generally vest over a period of four years and
expire in five years from the date of grant. The following table
summarizes warrants for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
of Shares | |
|
Per Share |
|
|
| |
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2002
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
$2.00-$7.89 |
Granted
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
$0.97 |
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
$2.00-$3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2003
|
|
|
104,000 |
|
|
$0.97-$3.75 |
Granted
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
$2.31 |
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
$3.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 27, 2004
|
|
|
124,000 |
|
|
$0.97-$3.06 |
Granted
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
$2.83 |
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
$3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 26, 2005
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
$0.97-$2.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company granted warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of
Common Stock on November 13, 2002 to the Companys
previous lenders, Key Bank, N.A. and Citizens Bank, in
accordance with a Termination Agreement for refinancing the debt
with GMAC. See Note 4 above for further disclosure
regarding debt. 100,000 shares expired in the third quarter
of fiscal year 2005. The following table summarizes warrants
from the Termination Agreement that were originally granted and
are outstanding as of March 26, 2005 (shares and dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of 11/13/02 | |
|
|
|
As of 3/26/05 | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Number of | |
|
Pricing | |
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Pricing | |
Shares | |
|
Model | |
|
Expiration | |
|
Shares | |
|
Model | |
Outstanding | |
|
Valuation | |
|
Date | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Valuation | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
11/13/2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
11/13/2005 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
11/13/2007 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock: The 2003 Plan also allows the Company
to grant stock awards. The stock awards granted vest over a
period of one year. The following table summarizes stock awards
for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Awards Granted
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative Expenses, based on fair market value
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Unearned compensation was less than $0.1 million at
March 26, 2005 and March 27, 2004.
51
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 8 |
Segment and Geographic Data |
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution Products
(Product) and Calibration Services
(Service). The accounting policies of the reportable
segments are the same as those described above in Note 1 of
the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has no
inter-segment sales. The following table presents segment and
geographic data for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$ |
37,086 |
|
|
$ |
35,423 |
|
|
$ |
38,359 |
|
|
Service
|
|
|
18,221 |
|
|
|
17,894 |
|
|
|
18,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
55,307 |
|
|
|
53,317 |
|
|
|
57,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
8,779 |
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
10,326 |
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5,113 |
|
|
|
4,923 |
|
|
|
2,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,892 |
|
|
|
13,398 |
|
|
|
13,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product (1)
|
|
|
8,090 |
|
|
|
7,326 |
|
|
|
7,378 |
|
|
Service (1)
|
|
|
4,903 |
|
|
|
5,765 |
|
|
|
5,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12,993 |
|
|
|
13,091 |
|
|
|
12,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(880 |
) |
|
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
5,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
(4,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets (2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$ |
12,690 |
|
|
$ |
10,441 |
|
|
$ |
9,753 |
|
|
Service
|
|
|
6,223 |
|
|
|
6,084 |
|
|
|
5,356 |
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
20,112 |
|
|
$ |
18,385 |
|
|
$ |
16,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$ |
634 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
Service
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,299 |
|
|
$ |
2,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005 | |
|
FY 2004 | |
|
FY 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Capital Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
Service
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
866 |
|
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales to Unaffiliated Customers (3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
50,170 |
|
|
$ |
48,309 |
|
|
$ |
52,035 |
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
5,137 |
|
|
|
5,008 |
|
|
|
5,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
55,307 |
|
|
$ |
53,317 |
|
|
$ |
57,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
1,759 |
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,099 |
|
|
$ |
2,206 |
|
|
$ |
2,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Operating expense allocations between segments were based on
actual amounts, a percentage of sales, headcount, and
managements estimates. |
|
(2) |
Goodwill of $2.5 million for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and
2003 was allocated based on the percentage of segment revenue
acquired, 60% product and 40% service. |
|
(3) |
Net sales are attributed to the countries based on the location
of the subsidiary making the sale. |
|
(4) |
Long-lived assets consist of property, plant, and equipment and
capital leases and are entirely allocated to the United States
with the exception of Canadian fixed assets. |
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal years financial
information have been made to conform with current fiscal
years presentation.
Leases: Transcat leases facilities, equipment, and
vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases. Total rental
expense for fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003 was approximately
$0.9 million, $0.9 million, and $1.0 million,
respectively. The Company leases certain computer equipment
under non-cancelable capital leases. Capital lease expenses for
fiscal years 2005 and 2004 were less than $0.1 million in
each year. The Company has
53
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
no capital lease obligations for fiscal year 2003. The minimum
future annual rental payments under the non-cancelable leases at
March 26, 2005 are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital | |
|
Operating | |
Fiscal Year |
|
Leases | |
|
Leases | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
2007
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconditional Purchase Obligation: In fiscal year 2002,
the Company entered into a distribution agreement (the
Distribution Agreement) with Fluke Electronics
Corporation (Fluke) to be the exclusive worldwide
distributor of TPG products until December 31, 2006. Under
the Distribution Agreement, the Company also agreed to purchase
a pre-determined amount of inventory from Fluke.
On October 31, 2002, with an effective date of
September 1, 2002, the Company entered into a new
distribution agreement (the New Agreement) with
Fluke, which replaced the Distribution Agreement. The New
Agreement ends on December 31, 2006. Under the terms of the
New Agreement, among other items, the Company agreed to purchase
a larger, pre-determined amount of inventory across a broader
array of products and brands during each calendar year. The
Companys purchases for calendar years 2004 and 2003
exceeded the commitment under the New Agreement. The Company
believes that this commitment to future purchases is consistent
with Transcats business needs and plans.
In May 2002, Transcats former Vice President of Finance
sued the Company in New York State Supreme Court, Monroe County,
alleging, among other items, that the Company breached the terms
of his employment agreement with the Company when his employment
was terminated. In November 2003, the Company settled the
lawsuit for $0.2 million in order to avoid ongoing
litigation expenses. The $0.2 million was reflected in the
fiscal year 2004 Consolidated Statement of Operations as an
administrative expense.
|
|
Note 11 |
MAC Escrow and Holdback |
On January 18, 2002, Transcat completed the sale of the
Companys Measurement and Controls (MAC) unit
to Hughes Corporation for $2.9 million and reported a lost
of $4.5 million on the sale. In accordance with the MAC
divestiture, $0.2 million was received upon completion of
certain post-divestiture services that the Company substantially
completed by March 31, 2003.
54
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 12 |
Employee Termination Costs |
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, the following table shows the amounts expensed
and paid in fiscal years 2005, 2004, and 2003 for severance
costs that were initially incurred and accrued in these years
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the | |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Accrued | |
|
Actual | |
|
the End of | |
|
|
of the Year | |
|
Costs | |
|
Payments | |
|
the Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Severance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
FY 2003
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
Note 13 Vendor Concentration
Approximately 30% of Transcats product purchases on an
annual basis are from Fluke, which is not believed to be
inconsistent with Flukes share of the markets the Company
services.
55
TRANSCAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 14 Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
The following table presents certain unaudited quarterly
financial data for fiscal years 2005 and 2004 (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Cumu- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lative Effect of | |
|
|
|
Basic | |
|
Diluted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Change in | |
|
Net | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Earnings | |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Accounting | |
|
Income | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
|
Net Sales | |
|
Profit | |
|
Principle | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
FY 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$ |
15,557 |
|
|
$ |
4,339 |
|
|
$ |
504 |
|
|
$ |
504 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
14,040 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
12,488 |
|
|
|
2,909 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
55,307 |
|
|
$ |
13,892 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
256 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$ |
15,275 |
|
|
$ |
3,633 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
13,551 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
11,896 |
|
|
|
3,483 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
12,595 |
|
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
53,317 |
|
|
$ |
13,398 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
353 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal quarters
financial information have been made to conform with current
fiscal quarters presentation. |
56
TRANSCAT, INC.
SCHEDULE II: VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
(Reductions) to | |
|
Additions | |
|
Reductions | |
|
Balance | |
|
|
at the | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
(Reductions) to | |
|
due to | |
|
at the | |
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Statements | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
Products | |
|
End of | |
|
|
of the Year | |
|
of Operations | |
|
Balance Sheets | |
|
Sold | |
|
the Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
FY 2003
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
Reserve for Inventory Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(238 |
) |
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
FY 2003
|
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(635 |
) |
|
$ |
395 |
|
Deferred Asset Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$ |
3,793 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,802 |
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
$ |
3,728 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,793 |
|
|
FY 2003
|
|
$ |
2,589 |
|
|
$ |
1,139 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,728 |
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE |
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer (our principal executive officer) and our Chief
Operating Officer, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer (our principal financial officer) evaluated our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period
covered by this annual report. Based on this evaluation, our
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Operating Officer, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of such date.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting. There has been no change in our internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the last
fiscal quarter covered by this annual report (our fourth fiscal
quarter) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
OTHER INFORMATION |
Not applicable.
57
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10. |
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT |
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Executive Officers of the Registrant in Part I
of this Form 10-K and the information set forth under the
captions Election of Directors, Executive
Officers, Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance and Corporate Governance-Code
of Ethics in our definitive 2005 Proxy Statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.
|
|
ITEM 11. |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Executive Compensation in our definitive 2005 Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.
|
|
ITEM 12. |
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required by this Item, with the exception of
(d) below, is hereby incorporated by reference to the
information set forth under the captions Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Security
Ownership of Management in our definitive 2005 Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.
(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity
Compensation Plans as of March 26, 2005:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be issued | |
|
Weighted-average | |
|
Number of securities | |
|
|
upon exercise of | |
|
exercise price of | |
|
remaining available for future | |
|
|
outstanding options, | |
|
outstanding options, | |
|
issuance under equity | |
|
|
warrants, and non-vested | |
|
warrants, and non-vested | |
|
compensation plans (excluding | |
|
|
restricted stock | |
|
restricted stock | |
|
securities reflected in column (a)) | |
Plan category |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
ITEM 13. |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS |
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in
our definitive 2005 Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A.
|
|
ITEM 14. |
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm in our definitive 2005 Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15. |
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) See Index to Financial Statements included as
Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
(b) Exhibits.
|
|
|
See Index to Exhibits beginning on page 62 of this
Form 10-K. |
59
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSCAT, INC. |
|
Date: |
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Carl E. Sassano
Carl
E. Sassano
Director, Chairman, President &
Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date | |
|
Signature |
|
Title |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Carl E. Sassano
Carl
E. Sassano |
|
Director, Chairman, President &
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Charles P. Hadeed
Charles
P. Hadeed |
|
COO, Vice President-Finance & CFO (Principal Financial
Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Francis R. Bradley
Francis
R. Bradley |
|
Director |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ E. Lee Garelick
E.
Lee Garelick |
|
Director |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Richard J. Harrison
Richard
J. Harrison |
|
Director |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Nancy D. Hessler
Nancy
D. Hessler |
|
Director |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Robert G.
Klimasewski
Robert
G. Klimasewski |
|
Director |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Paul D. Moore
Paul
D. Moore |
|
Director |
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date | |
|
Signature |
|
Title |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Cornelius J. Murphy
Cornelius
J. Murphy |
|
Director |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Harvey J. Palmer
Harvey
J. Palmer |
|
Director |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ Alan H. Resnick
Alan
H. Resnick |
|
Director |
|
|
June 22, 2005 |
|
|
/s/ John T. Smith
John
T. Smith |
|
Director |
61
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
(2) Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement,
liquidation or succession
(3) Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
|
|
|
3.1 The Articles of Incorporation, as amended, are
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to the
Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-61665) filed on August 8, 1995
and to Exhibit 3(i) to the Companys Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. |
|
|
3.2 By-Laws, as amended through August 18, 1987, are
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (3) to the
Companys Form 10-K for the year ended March 31,
1988. (SEC File No. 000-03905). |
(4) Instruments defining the rights of security holders,
including indentures
|
|
|
The documents listed under (3) are incorporated herein by
reference. |
(9) Voting trust agreement
(10) Material Contracts
|
|
|
#10.1 Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to the
Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 1995. |
|
|
#10.2 Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors
Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 99(b) to the Companys Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-61665) filed on
August 8, 1995. |
|
|
#10.3 Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option
Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99(c)
to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration Statement No. 33-61665) filed on
August 8, 1995. |
|
|
#10.4 Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein to Exhibit 99(e) to the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration
No. 33-61665) filed on August 8, 1995. |
|
|
#10.5 Amendment No. 1 to the Transcat, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(i) to the Companys Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 1995. |
|
|
#10.6 Amendment No. 2 to the Transcat, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996. |
|
|
#10.7 Amendment No. 1 to the Transcat, Inc.
Employees Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996. |
|
|
#10.8 Amendment No. 1 to Transcat, Inc. Amended and
Restated Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit II to the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1996. |
|
|
#10.9 Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 to the Transcat,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan are
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits III and IV to
the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1996. |
|
|
#10.10 Amendment No. 2 to the Transcat, Inc.
Employees Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit V to the Companys Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996. |
|
|
#10.11 Amendment No. 3 to the Transcat, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(a) of the Companys Form 10-K for
the year ended March 31, 1997. |
|
|
#10.12 Amendment No. 2 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended
and Restated Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997. |
62
|
|
|
#10.13 Amendments No. 3 and 4 to the Transcat, Inc.
Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan are incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997. |
|
|
#10.14 Amendment No. 3 to the Transcat, Inc.
Employees Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(K) to the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1997. |
|
|
#10.15 Amendment No. 5 to the Transcat, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for
the year ended March 31, 1998. |
|
|
#10.16 Amendments No. 3 and 4 to the Transcat, Inc.
Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan are
incorporated herein by reference to the Companys
definitive proxy statement filed on July 7, 1998 in
connection with the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. |
|
|
#10.17 Amendment No. 4 to the Transcat, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 1998 and supercedes
Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1997. |
|
|
#10.18 Amendment No. 5 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended
and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999. |
|
|
#10.19 Amendment No. 6 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended
and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Appendix A to the Companys preliminary
proxy statement filed on June 21, 1999 in connection with
the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. |
|
|
#10.20 Amendment No. 5 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended
and Restated Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein
by reference to Appendix B to the Companys 1999
preliminary proxy statement filed on June 21, 1999 in
connection with the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. |
|
|
#10.21 Amendment No. 7 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended
and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000. |
|
|
#10.22 Amendment No. 6 to the Transcat, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 2000. |
|
|
#10.23 Amendment No. 8 to the Transcat, inc. Amended
and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001. |
|
|
#10.24 Amendment No. 4 to the Transcat, Inc.
Employees Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001. |
|
|
#10.25 Amendment No. 8 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended
and Restated Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001. |
|
|
#10.26 Amendment No. 7 to the Transcat, Inc.
Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2001. |
|
|
10.27 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of
December 26, 2001 by and among the Company, Altek
Industries Corp. and Fluke Electronics Corp. is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys
Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10, 2002. |
|
|
+10.28 Distributor Agreement dated December 26, 2001
by and between the Company and Fluke Electronics Corporation is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99(a) to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 10,
2002 and Exhibit 99(a) to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K/A dated June 5, 2002. |
|
|
10.29 Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of January 18,
2002 by and between the Company and Hughes Corporation is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2(a) to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
January 22, 2002. |
|
|
#10.30 Amendment No. 9 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended
and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002. |
63
|
|
|
+10.31 Fluke Distribution Agreement, as amended, is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002. |
|
|
10.32 Loan and Security Agreement dated November 12,
2002 by and among GMAC Business Credit, LLC, Transcat, Inc. and
Transmation (Canada) Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2002. |
|
|
10.33 First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated
April 11, 2003 by GMAC Commercial Finance LLC (successor by
merger to GMAC Business Credit, LLC), Transcat, Inc. and
Transmation (Canada) Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the
year ended March 31, 2003. |
|
|
#10.34 Amendment No. 10 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended
and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003. |
|
|
#10.35 Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated
herein by reference to Appendix A to the Companys
2003 definitive proxy statement filed on July 18, 2003 in
connection with the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. |
|
|
#10.36 Form of Agreement for Severance Upon Change in
Control for Carl E. Sassano and Charles P. Hadeed is
incorporated herein by reference Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 27, 2004. |
|
|
10.37 Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated
July 22, 2004 by GMAC Commercial Finance LLC (successor by
merger to GMAC Business Credit, LLC), Transcat, Inc. and
Transmation (Canada) Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 26, 2004. |
|
|
10.38 Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement
between Transcat, Inc., Transmation (Canada) Inc. and GMAC
Commercial Finance LLC dated November 1, 2004 is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
November 1, 2004. |
|
|
#10.39 Form of Award Notice for Incentive Stock Options
granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 25, 2004. |
|
|
#10.40 Form of Award Notice for Restricted Stock granted
under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 the Companys
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 25, 2004. |
|
|
#10.41 Performance Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by
reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K
dated April 27, 2005. |
|
|
*#10.42 Form of Warrant Certificate representing warrants
granted under the Amended and Restated Directors Warrant
Plan. |
(11) Statement re computation of per share earnings
|
|
|
Computation can be clearly determined from the Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
included herein as Item 8. |
(12) Statement re computation of ratios
(13) Annual report to security holders, Form 10-Q or
quarterly report to security holders
(16) Letter re change in certifying accountant
(18) Letter re change in accounting principles
(21) Subsidiaries of the registrant
|
|
|
*21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
64
(22) Published report regarding matters submitted to vote
of security holders
(23) Consents of Experts and Counsel
|
|
|
*23.1 Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP |
|
|
*23.2 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
(24) Power of Attorney
(31) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
|
|
|
*31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
*31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
(32) Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
*32.1 Section 1350 Certifications |
(99) Additional Exhibits
|
|
* |
Exhibits filed with this report. |
|
# |
Management contract or compensatory plan. |
|
|
+ |
The Company has requested confidential treatment of certain
information contained in this Exhibit. Such information has been
filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Companys application for confidential
treatment under 17 C.F.R. § 200.80(b)(4) and
§ 240.24b-2. |
65