UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

or

Commission File Number 1-9861

M&T BANK CORPORATION

(716) 842-5445
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [  ].

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [x] No [  ].

Number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.50 par value, outstanding as of the close of business on April 30, 2005: 113,672,505 shares.

M&T BANK CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005

- 2 -

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)

- 3 -

M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (Unaudited)

- 4 -

M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

- 5 -

M&T BANK CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)

CONSOLIDATED SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (Unaudited)

		Three months ended March 31
In thousands		2005				2004
Beginning balance		$	626,864				614,058
Provision for credit losses			24,000				20,000
Allowance related to loans sold or securitized			—				(501	)
Net charge-offs
Charge-offs			(26,783	)			(29,401	)
Recoveries			7,912				11,484
Total net charge-offs			(18,871	)			(17,917	)
Ending balance		$	631,993				615,640

- 6 -

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Significant accounting policies

The consolidated financial statements of M&T Bank Corporation (“M&T”) and subsidiaries (“the Company”) were compiled in accordance with the accounting policies set forth in note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2004 Annual Report. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation have been made and were all of a normal recurring nature.

2. Earnings per share

The computations of basic earnings per share follow:

The computations of diluted earnings per share follow:

- 7 -

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

3. Comprehensive income

The following table displays the components of other comprehensive income:

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net consisted of unrealized gains (losses) as follows:

- 8 -

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

4. Borrowings

In 1997, M&T Capital Trust I (“Trust I”), M&T Capital Trust II (“Trust II”), and M&T Capital Trust III (“Trust III”) issued $310 million of fixed rate preferred capital securities. In 1996, $150 million of floating rate preferred capital securities were issued by First Maryland Capital I (“Trust IV”) and in 1997, $150 million of floating rate preferred capital securities were issued by First Maryland Capital II (“Trust V”). The distribution rates on the preferred capital securities of Trust IV and Trust V adjust quarterly based on changes in the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and were 3.66% and 3.59%, respectively, at March 31, 2005 and 3.07% and 3.01%, respectively, at December 31, 2004. Trust I, Trust II, Trust III, Trust IV and Trust V are referred to herein collectively as the “Trusts.”

Other than the following payment terms (and the redemption terms described below), the preferred capital securities issued by the Trusts (“Capital Securities”) are substantially identical in all material respects:

The common securities of each Trust (“Common Securities”) are wholly owned by M&T and are the only class of each Trust’s securities possessing general voting powers. The Capital Securities represent preferred undivided interests in the assets of the corresponding Trust. Under the Federal Reserve Board’s current risk-based capital guidelines, the Capital Securities are includable in M&T’s Tier 1 (core) capital.

The proceeds from the issuances of the Capital Securities and Common Securities were used by the Trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (“Junior Subordinated Debentures”) of M&T as follows:

-9-

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

4. Borrowings, continued

The Junior Subordinated Debentures represent the sole assets of each Trust and payments under the Junior Subordinated Debentures are the sole source of cash flow for each Trust. The financial statement carrying values of junior subordinated debentures associated with preferred capital securities of Trust III, Trust IV and Trust V at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 include the unamortized portions of purchase accounting adjustments to reflect estimated fair value as of the date of M&T’s acquisition of the common securities of each respective trust. The interest rates payable on the Junior Subordinated Debentures of Trust IV and Trust V were 3.66% and 3.59%, respectively, at March 31, 2005 and 3.07% and 3.01%, respectively, at December 31, 2004.

Holders of the Capital Securities receive preferential cumulative cash distributions on each distribution date at the stated distribution rate unless M&T exercises its right to extend the payment of interest on the Junior Subordinated Debentures for up to ten semi-annual periods (in the case of Trust I, Trust II and Trust III) or twenty quarterly periods (in the case of Trust IV and Trust V), in which case payment of distributions on the respective Capital Securities will be deferred for comparable periods. During an extended interest period, M&T may not pay dividends or distributions on, or repurchase, redeem or acquire any shares of its capital stock. The agreements governing the Capital Securities, in the aggregate, provide a full, irrevocable and unconditional guarantee by M&T of the payment of distributions on, the redemption of, and any liquidation distribution with respect to the Capital Securities. The obligations under such guarantee and the Capital Securities are subordinate and junior in right of payment to all senior indebtedness of M&T.

The Capital Securities will remain outstanding until the Junior Subordinated Debentures are repaid at maturity, are redeemed prior to maturity or are distributed in liquidation to the Trusts. The Capital Securities are mandatorily redeemable in whole, but not in part, upon repayment at the stated maturity dates of the Junior Subordinated Debentures or the earlier redemption of the Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole upon the occurrence of one or more events (“Events”) set forth in the indentures relating to the Capital Securities, and in whole or in part at any time after the stated optional redemption dates (January 15, 2007 in the case of Trust IV, February 1, 2007 in the case of Trust I, Trust III and Trust V, and June 1, 2007 in the case of Trust II) contemporaneously with the optional redemption of the related Junior Subordinated Debentures in whole or in part. The Junior Subordinated Debentures are redeemable prior to their stated maturity dates at M&T’s option (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of one or more of the Events, in each case subject to possible regulatory approval. The redemption price of the Capital Securities and the

-10-

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

4. Borrowings, continued

related Junior Subordinated Debentures upon early redemption will be expressed as a percentage of the liquidation amount plus accumulated but unpaid distributions. In the case of Trust I, such percentage adjusts annually and ranges from 104.117% at February 1, 2007 to 100.412% for the annual period ending January 31, 2017, after which the percentage is 100%, subject to a make-whole amount if the early redemption occurs prior to February 1, 2007. In the case of Trust II, such percentage adjusts annually and ranges from 104.139% at June 1, 2007 to 100.414% for the annual period ending May 31, 2017, after which the percentage is 100%, subject to a make-whole amount if the early redemption occurs prior to June 1, 2007. In the case of Trust III, such percentage adjusts annually and ranges from 104.625% at February 1, 2007 to 100.463% for the annual period ending January 31, 2017, after which the percentage is 100%, subject to a make-whole amount if the early redemption occurs prior to February 1, 2007. In the case of Trust IV and Trust V, the redemption price upon early redemption will be equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed plus any accrued but unpaid distributions to the redemption date.

In 1999, Allfirst Preferred Capital Trust (“Allfirst Capital Trust”) issued $100 million of Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Subordinated Trust Enhanced Securities (“SKATES”). Allfirst Capital Trust is a Delaware business trust that was formed in June 1999 for the exclusive purposes of (i) issuing the SKATES and common securities, (ii) purchasing Asset Preferred Securities issued by Allfirst Preferred Asset Trust (“Allfirst Asset Trust”) and (iii) engaging in only those other activities necessary or incidental thereto. M&T holds 100% of the common securities of Allfirst Capital Trust. Allfirst Asset Trust is a Delaware business trust that was formed in June 1999 for the exclusive purposes of (i) issuing Asset Preferred Securities and common securities, (ii) investing the gross proceeds of the Asset Preferred Securities in junior subordinated debentures assumed by M&T in an acquisition and other permitted investments and (iii) engaging in only those other activities necessary or incidental thereto. M&T holds 100% of the common securities of Allfirst Asset Trust and Allfirst Capital Trust holds 100% of the Asset Preferred Securities of Allfirst Asset Trust. M&T currently has outstanding $105.3 million aggregate liquidation amount Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures due July 15, 2029 that are payable to Allfirst Asset Trust. The interest rates payable on such debentures were 4.09% at March 31, 2005 and 3.50% at December 31, 2004.

Distributions on the SKATES are non-cumulative. The distribution rate on the SKATES and on the Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Debentures is a rate per annum of three month LIBOR plus 1.50% reset quarterly two business days prior to the distribution dates of January 15, April 15, July 15, and October 15 in each year. Distributions on the SKATES will be paid if, as and when Allfirst Capital Trust has funds available for payment. The SKATES are subject to mandatory redemption if the Asset Preferred Securities of Allfirst Asset Trust are redeemed. Allfirst Asset Trust will redeem the Asset Preferred Securities if the junior subordinated debentures of M&T held by Allfirst Asset Trust are redeemed. M&T may redeem such junior subordinated debentures, in whole or in part, at any time on or after July 15, 2009, subject to regulatory approval. Allfirst Asset Trust will redeem the Asset Preferred Securities at par plus accrued and unpaid distributions from the last distribution payment date. M&T has guaranteed, on a subordinated basis, the payment in full of all distributions and other payments on the SKATES and on the Asset Preferred Securities to the extent that Allfirst Capital Trust and Allfirst Asset Trust, respectively, have funds legally available. Under the Federal Reserve Board’s current risk-based capital guidelines, the SKATES are includable in M&T’s Tier 1 Capital.

-11-

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

4. Borrowings, continued

Including the unamortized portions of purchase accounting adjustments to reflect estimated fair value at the acquisition dates of the common securities of Trust III, Trust IV, Trust V and Allfirst Asset Trust, the junior subordinated debentures associated with preferred capital securities had financial statement carrying values as follows:

5. Segment information

Reportable segments have been determined based upon the Company’s internal profitability reporting system, which is organized by strategic business units. Certain strategic business units have been combined for segment information reporting purposes where the nature of the products and services, the type of customer and the distribution of those products and services are similar. The reportable segments are Commercial Banking, Commercial Real Estate, Discretionary Portfolio, Residential Mortgage Banking and Retail Banking.

The financial information of the Company’s segments was compiled utilizing the accounting policies described in note 21 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. The management accounting policies and processes utilized in compiling segment financial information are highly subjective and, unlike financial accounting, are not based on authoritative guidance similar to generally accepted accounting principles. As a result, the financial information of the reported segments is not necessarily comparable with similar information reported by other financial institutions. As also described in note 21 to the Company’s 2004 consolidated financial statements, neither goodwill nor core deposit and other intangible assets (and the amortization charges associated with such assets) resulting from acquisitions of financial institutions have been allocated to the Company’s reportable segments, but are included in the “All Other” category. The Company has, however, assigned such intangible assets to business units for purposes of

-12-

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

5. Segment information, continued

testing for impairment. Information about the Company’s segments is presented in the following table:

(a)

Total revenues are comprised of net interest income and other income. Net interest income is the difference between taxable-equivalent interest earned on assets owned, interest paid on liabilities owed by a segment and a funding charge (credit) based on the Company’s internal funds transfer methodology. Segments are charged a cost to fund any assets (e.g. loans) and are paid a funding credit for any funds provided (e.g. deposits). Total revenues and net income (loss) for the first quarter of 2004 have been adjusted to reflect modifications to the internal funds transfer

-13-

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

5. Segment information, continued

		methodology effective January 1, 2005. The net effect of the change was to increase previously reported net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 in the Retail Banking segment by $4 million and to decrease previously reported net income for each of the Commercial Banking and Discretionary Portfolio segments by $1 million and the Commercial Real Estate segment by $2 million. The taxable-equivalent adjustment aggregated $4,120,000 and $4,230,000 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and is eliminated in “All Other” total revenues. Intersegment revenues are included in total revenues of the reportable segments. The elimination of intersegment revenues is included in the determination of “All Other” total revenues.
(b)		During the second quarter of 2004, a business unit that had been previously included in the “All Other” category was moved to the Commercial Real Estate segment for internal profitability reporting purposes. As a result, approximately $64 million of assets were transferred from the “All Other” category to the Commercial Real Estate segment. This business unit contributed net income of approximately $1 million in the first quarter of 2004. Information for 2004 has been reclassified to conform to current period presentations.

6. Commitments and contingencies

In the normal course of business, various commitments and contingent liabilities are outstanding. The following table presents the Company’s significant commitments. Certain of these commitments are not included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers, generally having fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses that may require payment of a fee. Standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of

-14-

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

6. Commitments and contingencies, continued

the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party, whereas commercial letters of credit are issued to facilitate commerce and typically result in the commitment being funded when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and third party. The credit risk associated with commitments to extend credit and standby and commercial letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved with extending loans to customers and is subject to normal credit policies. Collateral may be obtained based on management’s assessment of the customer’s creditworthiness.

Financial guarantees and indemnification contracts are oftentimes similar to standby letters of credit and include mandatory purchase agreements issued to ensure that customer obligations are fulfilled, recourse obligations associated with sold loans, and other guarantees of customer performance or compliance with designated rules and regulations. Included in financial guarantees and indemnification contracts are loan principal amounts sold with recourse in conjunction with the Company’s involvement in the Federal National Mortgage Association Delegated Underwriting and Servicing program. Under this program, the Company’s maximum credit risk associated with loans sold with recourse totaled $932 million and $926 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.

Since many loan commitments, standby letters of credit, and guarantees and indemnification contracts expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily indicative of future cash flows.

The Company utilizes commitments to sell real estate loans to hedge exposure to changes in the fair value of real estate loans held for sale. Such commitments are considered derivatives in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended, and along with commitments to originate real estate loans to be held for sale and hedged real estate loans held for sale are generally recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at estimated fair market value. However, in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 105, “Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments,” issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, effective April 1, 2004, value ascribable to cash flows that will be realized in connection with loan servicing activities has not been included in the determination of fair value of loans held for sale or commitments to originate loans for sale. Value ascribable to that portion of cash flows is now recognized at the time the underlying mortgage loans are sold. As a result of implementing SAB No. 105, there was a deferral of approximately $6 million of mortgage banking revenues as of March 31, 2005 that will be recognized when the underlying mortgage loans are sold.

The Company has an agreement with the Baltimore Ravens of the National Football League whereby the Company obtained the naming rights to a football stadium in Baltimore, Maryland for a fifteen year term. Under the agreement, the Company paid $3 million in both 2003 and 2004, and is obligated to pay $5 million per year from 2005 through 2013 and $6 million per year from 2014 through 2017.

The Company also has commitments under long-term operating leases.

M&T and its subsidiaries are subject in the normal course of business to various pending and threatened legal proceedings in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, does not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising out of litigation pending against M&T or its subsidiaries will be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, but at the present time is not in a position to determine whether such litigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations in any future reporting period.

-15-

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED

7. Pension plans and other postretirement benefits

The Company provides defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefits (including health care and life insurance benefits) to qualified retired employees. Net periodic benefit cost consisted of the following:

-16-

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

Net income of M&T Bank Corporation (“M&T”) was $189 million or $1.62 of diluted earnings per common share in the first quarter of 2005, increases of 19% and 25%, respectively, from $159 million or $1.30 of diluted earnings per common share in the first quarter of 2004. During the fourth quarter of 2004, net income was $192 million or $1.62 of diluted earnings per common share. Basic earnings per common share were $1.65 in the recently completed quarter, compared with $1.33 in the first quarter of 2004 and $1.66 in 2004’s final quarter.

     The annualized rate of return on average total assets for M&T and its consolidated subsidiaries (“the Company”) in 2005’s first quarter was 1.44%, compared with 1.29% in the year-earlier quarter and 1.45% in the fourth quarter of 2004. The annualized rate of return on average common stockholders’ equity was 13.41% in the recent quarter, compared with 11.19% and 13.37% in the first and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively.

Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Results of Operations

As a result of accounting for business combinations using the purchase method of accounting, the Company had recorded intangible assets consisting of goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets totaling $3.1 billion at each of March 31, 2005, March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2004. Included in such intangible assets at each of those dates was goodwill of $2.9 billion. Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets, after tax effect, was $10 million ($.08 per diluted share) during each of the first quarter of 2005 and fourth quarter of 2004, compared with $13 million ($.11 per diluted share) in the first quarter of 2004.

     Since 1998, M&T has consistently provided supplemental reporting of its results on a “net operating” or “tangible” basis, from which M&T excludes the after-tax effect of amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets (and the related goodwill, core deposit intangible and other intangible asset balances, net of applicable deferred tax amounts) and expenses associated with merging acquired operations into the Company, since such expenses are considered by management to be “nonoperating” in nature. Although “net operating income” as defined by M&T is not a GAAP measure, M&T’s management believes that this information helps investors understand the effect of acquisition activity in reported results.

     Net operating income rose 15% to $199 million in the first quarter of 2005 from $172 million in the corresponding quarter of 2004. Diluted net operating earnings per share for the recent quarter were $1.70, an increase of 21% from $1.41 in the first quarter of 2004. Net operating income and diluted net operating earnings per share were $202 million and $1.70, respectively, in the fourth quarter of 2004.

     Net operating income in 2005’s initial quarter represented an annualized rate of return on average tangible assets of 1.61%, compared with 1.48% and 1.62% in the first and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively. Net operating income expressed as an annualized return on average tangible common equity was 29.67% in the recently completed quarter, compared with 26.02% in the year-earlier quarter and 29.69% in the fourth quarter of 2004.

     Reconciliations of GAAP results with non-GAAP results are provided in table 2.

-17-

Taxable-equivalent Net Interest Income

Taxable-equivalent net interest income rose 5% to $446 million in the first quarter of 2005 from $424 million in the year-earlier quarter, but was equal to the fourth quarter of 2004. The improvement in the recent quarter as compared with 2004’s initial quarter reflects a $3.8 billion, or 9%, increase in average earning assets, partially offset by a narrowing of the Company’s net interest margin, or taxable-equivalent net interest income expressed as an annualized percentage of average earning assets.

     Average loans and leases rose $2.7 billion, or 8%, to $38.6 billion in the recently completed quarter from $35.8 billion in the first quarter of 2004, and were up 1% from the $38.1 billion average in 2004’s fourth quarter. Leading the recent quarter’s growth in average loans from a year earlier were higher average outstanding commercial loans and commercial real estate loans which increased $1.0 billion or 11% and $1.7 billion or 13%, respectively. Average residential real estate loans increased $162 million or 5% from the first quarter of 2004, due, in part, to higher average balances of loans held for sale by the Company’s residential mortgage banking subsidiary, M&T Mortgage Corporation. Reflecting mixed results, the consumer loan portfolio declined in the first quarter of 2005 by $92 million or 1% as compared with the first quarter of 2004. Growth in the outstanding balances of home equity lines of credit was offset by a decline in automobile loans and leases and planned run-off of other second-mortgage loans. The Company experienced growth of 2% in the average balance of the commercial loan and commercial real estate loan portfolios in the recent quarter as compared with 2004’s final quarter, while average consumer loans declined by 1%. In dollar amount, average commercial loans and commercial real estate loans increased in 2005’s initial quarter by $175 million and $299 million, respectively, and the average balance of consumer loans decreased by $121 million as compared with the final quarter of 2004. The decline in consumer loans reflected a $183 million decrease in the average balance of automobile loans and leases, offset in part, by an increase of $85 million in average outstanding balances under home equity lines of credit. Average residential real estate loans in the recent quarter increased by $84 million or 3% from 2004’s fourth quarter. The accompanying table summarizes quarterly changes in the major components of the loan and lease portfolio.

AVERAGE LOANS AND LEASES
(net of unearned discount)
Dollars in millions

     Investment securities averaged $8.6 billion during 2005’s initial quarter, compared with $7.5 billion in the year-earlier quarter and $8.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2004. The higher level of investment securities in the recently completed quarter as compared with a year earlier reflected net purchases of securities in 2004 and 2005, consisting largely of collateralized residential mortgage obligations. The investment securities portfolio is largely comprised of residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, debt securities issued by

-18-

municipalities, debt and preferred equity securities issued by government-sponsored agencies and certain financial institutions, and shorter-term U.S. Treasury notes. When purchasing investment securities, the Company considers its overall interest-rate risk profile as well as the adequacy of expected returns relative to risks assumed, including prepayments. In managing its investment securities portfolio, the Company occasionally sells investment securities as a result of changes in interest rates and spreads, actual or anticipated prepayments, or credit risk associated with a particular security, or as a result of restructuring its investment securities portfolio following completion of a business combination.

     Money-market assets, which are comprised of interest-earning deposits at banks, interest-earning trading account assets, federal funds sold and agreements to resell securities, averaged $87 million in the recently completed quarter, compared with $85 million and $67 million in the first and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively. The amount of investment securities and money-market assets held by the Company are influenced by such factors as demand for loans, which generally yield more than investment securities and money-market assets, ongoing repayments, the levels of deposits, and management of balance sheet size and resulting capital ratios.

     As a result of the changes described herein, average earning assets rose 9% to $47.2 billion in the initial quarter of 2005 from $43.4 billion in the year-earlier quarter. Average earning assets were $46.5 billion in the final 2004 quarter.

     The most significant source of funding for the Company is core deposits, which are comprised of noninterest-bearing deposits, interest-bearing transaction accounts, nonbrokered savings deposits and nonbrokered domestic time deposits under $100,000. The Company’s branch network is its principal source of core deposits, which generally carry lower interest rates than wholesale funds of comparable maturities. Certificates of deposit under $100,000 generated on a nationwide basis by M&T Bank, National Association (“M&T Bank, N.A.”), a wholly owned bank subsidiary of M&T, are also included in core deposits. Average core deposits were $27.6 billion in the first quarter of 2005, compared with $27.9 billion in the year earlier quarter and $28.1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2004. The following table provides an analysis of quarterly changes in the components of average core deposits. The decline in average NOW account balances in the recent quarter compared with the first quarter of 2004 reflects product modifications that resulted in additional customer balances being swept into savings deposit accounts.

AVERAGE CORE DEPOSITS

     Additional sources of funding for the Company include domestic time deposits of $100,000 or more, deposits originated through the Company’s offshore branch office, and brokered deposits. Domestic time deposits over $100,000, excluding brokered certificates of deposit, averaged $1.4 billion in the quarter ended March 31, 2005, compared with $1.2 billion during the first quarter of 2004 and $1.3 billion in 2004’s final quarter. Offshore branch deposits, primarily comprised of accounts with balances of $100,000 or more, averaged $4.2 billion, $2.8 billion and $3.5 billion for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005, March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Average brokered time deposits totaled $1.9 billion during the

-19-

recent quarter, compared with $854 million and $1.7 billion in the first and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively. At March 31, 2005, brokered time deposits totaled $2.5 billion and the weighted-average remaining term to maturity of such deposits was 14 months. Certain of these brokered time deposits have provisions that allow early redemption. In connection with the Company’s management of interest rate risk, interest rate swap agreements have been entered into under which the Company receives a fixed rate of interest and pays a variable rate and that have notional amounts and terms substantially similar to the amounts and terms of $160 million of brokered time deposits. The Company also had brokered money-market deposit accounts which averaged $60 million during the first quarter of 2005, compared with $59 million in the corresponding quarter of 2004 and $57 million in the fourth quarter of 2004. Offshore branch deposits and brokered deposits have been used by the Company as alternatives to short-term borrowings. Additional amounts of offshore branch deposits or brokered deposits may be solicited in the future depending on market conditions, including demand by customers and other investors for those deposits, and the cost of funds available from alternative sources at the time.

     The Company also uses borrowings from banks, securities dealers, the Federal Home Loan Banks of New York, Pittsburgh and Atlanta (together, the “FHLB”), and others as sources of funding. Short-term borrowings averaged $5.2 billion in the first 2005 quarter, compared with $4.8 billion and $5.4 billion in the first and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively. Unsecured federal funds borrowings, which generally mature daily, included in short-term borrowings averaged $4.4 billion, $3.9 billion and $4.5 billion in the first quarters of 2005 and 2004, and the fourth quarter of 2004, respectively. Overnight federal funds borrowings represent the largest component of short-term borrowings and are obtained daily from a wide variety of banks and other financial institutions. Also included in short-term borrowings is a $500 million revolving asset-backed structured borrowing secured by automobile loans that were transferred to M&T Auto Receivables I, LLC, a special purpose subsidiary of M&T Bank (the principal bank subsidiary of M&T) formed in November 2002. The special purpose subsidiary, the loans and the borrowings are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

     Long-term borrowings averaged $6.4 billion in the initial quarter of 2005, compared with $5.6 billion in the year-earlier quarter and $6.1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2004. Included in average long-term borrowings were amounts borrowed from the FHLB of $3.9 billion in the first quarter of 2005, and $3.1 billion and $3.5 billion in the first and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively, and subordinated capital notes of $1.3 billion in each of those quarters. Junior subordinated debentures associated with trust preferred securities that were included in average long-term borrowings were $711 million in the first quarter of 2005 and in the fourth quarter of 2004, and $710 million in the initial 2004 quarter. Information regarding trust preferred securities and the related junior subordinated debentures is provided in note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements. As described later, certain interest rate swap agreements have been entered into by the Company as part of its management of interest rate risk relating to long-term borrowings.

     Changes in the composition of the Company’s earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as described herein, as well as changes in interest rates and spreads, can impact net interest income. Net interest spread, or the difference between the taxable-equivalent yield on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities, was 3.46% in the first quarter of 2005 and 3.67% in the year-earlier quarter. The yield on earning assets during the recent quarter was 5.52%, up 42 basis points (hundredths of one percent) from 5.10% in the first quarter of 2004, while the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities increased 63 basis points to 2.06% from 1.43%. In the final quarter of 2004, the net interest spread was 3.49%, the yield on earning assets

-20-

was 5.24% and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 1.75%. The contraction of the net interest spread from the prior periods reflects the impact of rising short-term interest rates since June 2004 and the fact that, in general, rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, including short-term borrowings and foreign office deposits, tend to reprice more rapidly than yields on many earning assets. During the period from June 30, 2004 through March 31, 2005, the Federal Reserve raised its benchmark overnight federal funds target rate seven times, each increase representing a 25 basis point increment over the previous effective target rate.

     Net interest-free funds consist largely of noninterest-bearing demand deposits and stockholders’ equity, partially offset by bank owned life insurance and non-earning assets, including goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets. Average net interest-free funds totaled $8.6 billion in the recent quarter, compared with $7.8 billion and $8.7 billion in the first and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively. The increase in average net interest-free funds in the first 2005 quarter as compared with the initial 2004 quarter were largely due to higher non-interest bearing deposit balances. Goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets averaged $3.1 billion during each of the quarters ended March 31, 2005, March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2004. The cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance averaged $1.0 billion in each of the first quarter of 2005 and 2004 and in the fourth quarter of 2004. Increases in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance are not included in interest income, but rather are recorded in “other revenues from operations.”

     The contribution of net interest-free funds to net interest margin was .37% in the recent quarter, compared with .25% in the year-earlier quarter and .33% in 2004’s fourth quarter. The increase in the contribution to net interest margin ascribed to net interest-free funds in the recent quarter as compared with the first quarter of 2004 and the fourth quarter of 2004 resulted largely from the impact of higher interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities used to value such contribution.

     Reflecting the changes to the net interest spread and the contribution of interest-free funds as described herein, the Company’s net interest margin was 3.83% in 2005’s initial quarter, down from 3.92% in the comparable quarter of 2004, but little changed from 3.82% in the fourth quarter of 2004. Until the recent quarter, net interest margin had declined in each quarter subsequent to the first quarter of 2003, and net interest margin for the fourth quarter of 2004 was the lowest earned by the Company since the fourth quarter of 1998.

     Future changes in market interest rates or spreads, as well as changes in the composition of the Company’s portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that result in reductions in spreads, could adversely impact the Company’s net interest income and net interest margin. Management assesses the potential impact of future changes in interest rates and spreads by projecting net interest income under several interest rate scenarios. In managing interest rate risk, the Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements to modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of its portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Periodic settlement amounts arising from these agreements are generally reflected in either the yields earned on assets or the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. The notional amount of interest rate swap agreements entered into for interest rate risk management purposes was $735 million as of March 31, 2005, $725 million as of December 31, 2004 and $675 million as of March 31, 2004. In general, under the terms of these swap agreements, the Company receives payments based on the outstanding notional amount of the swaps at fixed rates of interest and makes payments at variable rates.

     As of March 31, 2005, all of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements entered into for risk management purposes had been designated as fair value

-21-

hedges. In a fair value hedge, the fair value of the derivative (the interest rate swap agreement) and changes in the fair value of the hedged item are recorded in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet with the corresponding gain or loss recognized in current earnings. The difference between changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap agreements and the hedged items represents hedge ineffectiveness and is recorded in “other revenues from operations” in the Company’s consolidated statement of income. In a cash flow hedge, unlike in a fair value hedge, the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in “other revenues from operations” immediately. The amounts of hedge ineffectiveness recognized during the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 and the quarter ended December 31, 2004 were not material to the Company’s results of operations. The estimated aggregate fair value of interest rate swap agreements designated as fair value hedges was a loss of approximately $18 million at March 31, 2005, compared with a gain of $15 million at March 31, 2004 and a loss of $4 million at December 31, 2004. The fair values of such swap agreements were substantially offset by changes in the fair values of the hedged items. The changes in the fair values of the interest rate swap agreements and the hedged items result from the effects of changing interest rates.

     The weighted-average rates to be received and paid under interest rate swap agreements currently in effect were 6.72% and 5.27%, respectively, at March 31, 2005. The average notional amounts of interest rate swap agreements and the related effect on net interest income and margin, and the weighted-average rate paid or received on those swaps are presented in the accompanying table.

INTEREST RATE SWAP AGREEMENTS

*		Computed as an annualized percentage of average earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities.
**		Weighted-average rate paid or received on interest rate swap agreements in effect during the period.

     As a financial intermediary, the Company is exposed to various risks, including liquidity and market risk. Liquidity refers to the Company’s ability to ensure that sufficient cash flow and liquid assets are available to satisfy current and future obligations, including demands for loans and deposit withdrawals, funding operating costs, and other corporate purposes. Liquidity risk arises whenever the maturities of financial instruments included in assets and liabilities differ. M&T’s banking subsidiaries have access to additional funding sources through FHLB borrowings, lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and other available borrowing facilities. The Company has, from time to time, issued subordinated capital notes to provide liquidity and enhance regulatory capital ratios. As an additional source of funding, the Company entered into a $500 million revolving asset-backed structured borrowing, as noted earlier.

-22-

     The Company has informal and sometimes reciprocal sources of funding available through various arrangements for unsecured short-term borrowings from a wide group of banks and other financial institutions. Short-term federal funds borrowings aggregated $4.1 billion, $3.7 billion and $4.0 billion at March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2004, respectively. In general, these borrowings were unsecured and matured on the following business day.

     Should the Company experience a substantial deterioration in its financial condition or its debt ratings, or should the availability of short-term funding become restricted due to a disruption in the financial markets, the Company’s ability to obtain funding from these or other sources could be negatively impacted. The Company attempts to quantify such credit-event risk by modeling scenarios that estimate the liquidity impact resulting from a short-term ratings downgrade over various grading levels. The Company estimates such impact by attempting to measure the effect on available unsecured lines of credit, available capacity from secured borrowing sources and securitizable assets. In addition to deposits and borrowings, other sources of liquidity include maturities of money-market assets and investment securities, repayments of loans and investment securities, and cash generated from operations, such as fees collected for services.

     The Company serves in the capacity of remarketing agent for variable rate demand bonds (“VRDBs”), issued by customers of the Company for the purpose of obtaining financing. The VRDBs are enhanced by a direct-pay letter of credit provided by M&T Bank. Holders of the VRDBs generally have the right to sell the bonds to the remarketing agent with seven days notice, which could result in M&T Bank owning the VRDBs for some period of time until such instruments are remarketed. When this occurs, the VRDBs are classified as trading assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The value of VRDBs in the Company’s trading account totaled $25 million at March 31, 2005, $10 million at March 31, 2004 and $14 million at December 31, 2004. As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, the total amount of VRDBs outstanding backed by an M&T Bank letter of credit was $1.6 billion, compared with $1.5 billion at December 31, 2004. M&T Bank also serves as remarketing agent for most of those bonds.

     The Company enters into contractual obligations in the normal course of business which require future cash payments. Such obligations include, among others, payments related to deposits, borrowings, leases, and other contractual commitments. The Company also enters into various other off-balance sheet commitments to customers that may impact liquidity, including commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, commercial letters of credit, financial guarantees and indemnification contracts, and commitments to sell real estate loans. Since many of these commitments or contracts expire without being funded in whole or in part, the contract amounts are not necessarily indicative of future cash flows. Further information related to these commitments is provided in note 6 of Notes to Financial Statements.

     M&T’s primary source of funds to pay for operating expenses, shareholder dividends and treasury stock repurchases has historically been the receipt of dividends from its banking subsidiaries, which are subject to various regulatory limitations. Dividends from any banking subsidiary to M&T are limited by the amount of earnings of the banking subsidiary in the current year and the two preceding years. Under that limitation, at March 31, 2005 approximately $467 million was available for payment of dividends to M&T from banking subsidiaries without prior regulatory approval. These historic sources of cash flow have been augmented in the past by the issuance of trust preferred securities. Information regarding trust preferred securities and the related junior subordinated debentures is included in note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements. M&T also maintains a $30 million line of

-23-

credit with an unaffiliated commercial bank, of which there were no borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2005 or at December 31, 2004.

     On an ongoing basis, management closely monitors the Company’s liquidity position for compliance with internal policies and believes that available sources of liquidity are adequate to meet funding needs anticipated in the normal course of business. Management does not currently anticipate engaging in any activities, either currently or in the long-term, for which adequate funding would not be available and would therefore result in a significant strain on liquidity at either M&T or its subsidiary banks.

     Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and/or interest rates of the Company’s financial instruments. The primary market risk the Company is exposed to is interest rate risk. The core banking activities of lending and deposit-taking expose the Company to interest rate risk, since assets and liabilities reprice at different times and by different amounts as interest rates change. As a result, net interest income earned by the Company is subject to the effects of changing interest rates. The Company measures interest rate risk by calculating the variability of net interest income in future periods under various interest rate scenarios using projected balances for earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and derivatives used to hedge interest rate risk. Management’s philosophy toward interest rate risk management is to limit the variability of net interest income. The balances of financial instruments used in the projections are based on expected growth from forecasted business opportunities, anticipated prepayments of loans and investment securities, and expected maturities of investment securities, loans and deposits. Management uses a “value of equity” model to supplement the modeling technique described above. Those supplemental analyses are based on discounted cash flows associated with on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Such analyses are modeled to reflect changes in interest rates and shifts in the maturity curve of interest rates and provide management with a long-term interest rate risk metric.

     The Company’s Risk Forum Committee, which includes members of senior management, monitors the sensitivity of the Company’s net interest income to changes in interest rates with the aid of a computer model that forecasts net interest income under different interest rate scenarios. In modeling changing interest rates, the Company considers different yield curve shapes that consider both parallel (that is, simultaneous changes in interest rates at each point on the yield curve) and non-parallel (that is, allowing interest rates at points on the yield curve to vary by different amounts) shifts in the yield curve. Non-parallel changes in rates result in either a flattening or a steepening of the yield curve. In utilizing the model, market implied forward interest rates over the subsequent twelve months are generally used to determine a base interest rate scenario for the net interest income simulation. That calculated base net interest income is then compared to the income calculated under the varying interest rate scenarios. The model considers the impact of ongoing lending and deposit-gathering activities, as well as interrelationships in the magnitude and timing of the repricing of financial instruments, including the effect of changing interest rates on expected prepayments and maturities. When deemed prudent, management has taken actions, and intends to do so in the future, to mitigate exposure to interest rate risk through the use of on- or off-balance sheet financial instruments. Possible actions include, but are not limited to, changes in the pricing of loan and deposit products, modifying the composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and modifying or terminating existing interest rate swap agreements or other financial instruments used for interest rate risk management purposes.

     The accompanying table as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 displays the estimated impact on net interest income from non-trading financial instruments in the base scenario described above resulting from parallel changes in interest rates across repricing categories during the first modeling year.

-24-

SENSITIVITY OF NET INTEREST INCOME
TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES
(dollars in thousands)

     Many assumptions were utilized by the Company to calculate the impact that changes in interest rates may have on net interest income. The more significant assumptions included the rate of prepayments of mortgage-related assets, cash flows from derivative and other financial instruments held for non-trading purposes, loan and deposit volumes and pricing, and deposit maturities. In the scenario presented, the Company also assumed gradual changes in rates during a twelve-month period of 100 and 200 basis points as compared with the assumed base scenario. In the event that a 100 or 200 basis point rate change cannot be achieved, the applicable rate changes are limited to lesser amounts such that interest rates cannot be less than zero. The assumptions used in interest rate sensitivity modeling are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the Company cannot precisely predict the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. Actual results may differ significantly due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of changes in interest rates, market conditions, and interest rate differentials (spreads) between maturity/repricing categories, as well as any actions, such as those previously described, which management may take to counter such changes. In light of the uncertainties and assumptions associated with the process, the amounts presented in the table and changes in such amounts are not considered significant to the Company’s past or projected net interest income.

     The Company engages in trading activities to meet the financial needs of customers, to fund the Company’s obligations under certain deferred compensation plans and, to a limited extent, to profit from perceived market opportunities. Financial instruments utilized in trading activities have included forward and futures contracts related to foreign currencies and mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Treasury and other government securities, mortgage-backed securities, mutual funds and interest rate contracts, such as swap agreements. The Company generally mitigates the foreign currency and interest rate risk associated with trading activities by entering into offsetting trading positions. The amounts of gross and net trading positions, as well as the type of trading activities conducted by the Company, are subject to a well-defined series of potential loss exposure limits established by the Risk Forum Committee. However, as with any non-government guaranteed financial instrument, the Company is exposed to credit risk associated with counterparties to the Company’s trading activities.

     The notional amounts of interest rate contracts entered into for trading purposes totaled $6.2 billion at March 31, 2005, compared with $5.3 billion at March 31, 2004 and $5.9 billion at December 31, 2004. The notional amounts of foreign currency and other option and futures contracts entered into for trading purposes were $470 million, $605 million and $512 million at March 31, 2005, March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Although the notional amounts of these trading contracts are not recorded in the consolidated balance sheet, the fair values of all financial instruments used for trading activities are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet. The fair values of all trading account assets and liabilities were $153 million and $74 million, respectively, at March 31, 2005, $213 million and $144 million, respectively, at March 31, 2004, and $160 million and $94 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004. Included in trading account assets at March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2004 were $41 million, $40 million and $43 million, respectively, related to deferred compensation plans. Changes in the fair value of such assets are recorded in

-25-

trading account and foreign exchange gains in the consolidated statement of income. Included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2005, December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2004 were $48 million, $49 million and $51 million, respectively, of liabilities related to deferred compensation plans. Changes in the balances of such liabilities due to the valuation of allocated investment options to which the liabilities are indexed are recorded in “other costs of operations” in the consolidated statement of income.

     Given the Company’s policies, limits and positions, management believes that the potential loss exposure to the Company resulting from market risk associated with trading activities was not material.

Provision for Credit Losses

The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses that in management’s judgment is adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. A provision for credit losses is recorded to adjust the level of the allowance as deemed necessary by management. The provision for credit losses in the first quarter of 2005 was $24 million, compared with $20 million in the year-earlier quarter and $28 million in 2004’s fourth quarter. Net loan charge-offs were $19 million in the recent quarter, compared with $18 million during the first quarter of 2004 and $27 million during the final quarter of 2004. Net charge-offs as an annualized percentage of average loans and leases were .20% in the first quarter of each of 2005 and 2004, compared with .29% in the fourth quarter of 2004. A summary of net charge-offs by loan type follows:

NET CHARGE-OFFS
BY LOAN/LEASE TYPE

     Nonperforming loans consist of nonaccrual and restructured loans, and totaled $180 million or ..46% of total loans and leases outstanding at March 31, 2005, compared with $256 million or .70% a year earlier and $172 million or .45% at December 31, 2004. The significant decrease in nonperforming loans at the two most recent quarter-ends as compared with March 31, 2004 reflects both a general improvement in repayment performance by borrowers and the sale of two large commercial loans during the second quarter of 2004.

     Accruing loans past due 90 days or more totaled $125 million or .32% of total loans and leases at March 31, 2005, compared with $144 million or .40% at March 31, 2004 and $155 million or .40% at December 31, 2004. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more included $102 million, $117 million and $121 million at March 31, 2005, March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2004, respectively, of loans guaranteed by government-related entities. Such guaranteed loans included one-to-four family residential mortgage loans serviced by the Company that were repurchased to reduce servicing costs associated with them, including a requirement to advance principal and interest payments that had not been received from individual mortgagors. The outstanding principal balances of the repurchased loans are guaranteed by government-related entities and totaled $84 million and $110 million as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $104 million at December 31, 2004. Other accruing loans past due 90 days or more that were guaranteed by government-related entities

-26-

included foreign commercial and industrial loans supported by the Export-Import Bank of the United States totaling $17 million at each of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and $4 million at March 31, 2004.

     Commercial loans and leases classified as nonperforming aggregated $45 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and $128 million at March 31, 2004. The March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 totals when compared with the March 31, 2004 total reflected both a general improvement in repayment performance by borrowers and the sale of two large commercial loans during 2004’s second quarter.

     Nonperforming commercial real estate loans totaled $59 million at March 31, 2005, $44 million at March 31, 2004 and $45 million at December 31, 2004.

     Residential real estate loans classified as nonperforming were $39 million at March 31, 2005, compared with $48 million at March 31, 2004 and $44 million at December 31, 2004. Residential real estate loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest totaled $100 million at March 31, 2005, compared with $130 million a year earlier and $127 million at December 31, 2004. As already discussed, a substantial portion of such amounts relate to repurchased loans that are guaranteed by government-related entities.

     Nonperforming consumer loans and leases totaled $37 million at March 31, 2005, compared with $36 million at March 31, 2004 and $38 million at December 31, 2004. As a percentage of consumer loan balances outstanding, nonperforming consumer loans and leases were .33% at March 31, 2005, compared with .32% at March 31, 2004 and .35% at December 31, 2004.

     Assets acquired in settlement of defaulted loans were $11 million at March 31, 2005, compared with $19 million at March 31, 2004 and $13 million at December 31, 2004.

-27-

     A comparative summary of nonperforming assets and certain past due loan data and credit quality ratios as of the end of the periods indicated is presented in the accompanying table.

NONPERFORMING ASSET AND PAST DUE LOAN DATA