UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
or
o
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File No. 0-13147
LESCO, Inc.
Ohio (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
34-0904517 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
1301 East Ninth Street, Suite 1300 Cleveland, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices) |
44114 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(216) 706-9250
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ No o
Number of Common Shares, without par value, outstanding on May 2, 2005: 8,893,664.
1
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LESCO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS UNAUDITED
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 98,054 | $ | 102,044 | ||||
Cost of product |
(65,013 | ) | (68,943 | ) | ||||
Distribution cost |
(9,689 | ) | (9,494 | ) | ||||
Gross profit on sales |
23,352 | 23,607 | ||||||
Selling expense |
(23,810 | ) | (21,850 | ) | ||||
General & administrative expense |
(7,768 | ) | (7,253 | ) | ||||
Merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts |
(2,050 | ) | (1,628 | ) | ||||
Pre-opening expense |
(157 | ) | (312 | ) | ||||
Other expense |
(102 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Other income |
179 | 180 | ||||||
Loss before interest and taxes |
(10,356 | ) | (7,257 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, net |
(317 | ) | (355 | ) | ||||
Loss before taxes |
(10,673 | ) | (7,612 | ) | ||||
Income tax (provision) benefit: |
||||||||
Current |
| (340 | ) | |||||
Deferred |
3,540 | 3,309 | ||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
(3,540 | ) | (3,309 | ) | ||||
| (340 | ) | ||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,673 | ) | $ | (7,952 | ) | ||
Loss per
common share: |
||||||||
Diluted |
$ | (1.21 | ) | $ | (0.92 | ) | ||
Basic |
$ | (1.21 | ) | $ | (0.92 | ) | ||
Average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding: |
||||||||
Diluted |
8,818,121 | 8,677,507 | ||||||
Basic |
8,818,121 | 8,677,507 | ||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
LESCO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS UNAUDITED
(Dollars in thousands) | March 31, 2005 | March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2004 | |||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 9,150 | $ | 12,497 | $ | 8,101 | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
9,653 | 13,912 | 16,931 | |||||||||
Inventories |
130,146 | 114,861 | 100,582 | |||||||||
Other |
3,087 | 3,451 | 3,126 | |||||||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
152,036 | 144,721 | 128,740 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
25,506 | 30,403 | 26,019 | |||||||||
Other |
1,196 | 2,543 | 1,234 | |||||||||
$ | 178,738 | $ | 177,667 | $ | 155,993 | |||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 76,059 | $ | 73,405 | $ | 56,371 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
19,539 | 17,047 | 24,184 | |||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
24,751 | 17,553 | 7,303 | |||||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
120,349 | 108,005 | 87,858 | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
| 5,875 | | |||||||||
Deferred other |
1,741 | 229 | 1,612 | |||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
122,090 | 114,109 | 89,470 | |||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||||||
Common shareswithout par value
19,500,000 shares authorized; 8,872,914 shares
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2005;
8,694,694 shares issued and outstanding at March
31, 2004 and 8,697,194 issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2004 |
887 | 869 | 870 | |||||||||
Paid-in capital |
37,235 | 34,898 | 34,846 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
20,964 | 29,310 | 31,637 | |||||||||
Unearned compensation |
(2,438 | ) | (1,519 | ) | (830 | ) | ||||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
56,648 | 63,558 | 66,523 | |||||||||
$ | 178,738 | $ | 177,667 | $ | 155,993 | |||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
LESCO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS UNAUDITED
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,673 | ) | $ | (7,952 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
1,612 | 1,869 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing fees and other |
40 | 40 | ||||||
Loss (gain) on sale/disposal of fixed assets |
66 | (13 | ) | |||||
Decrease in accounts receivable |
7,278 | 2,247 | ||||||
Sale of accounts receivable |
| 3,119 | ||||||
Increase in inventories |
(29,564 | ) | (21,281 | ) | ||||
Increase in accounts payable |
19,526 | 29,458 | ||||||
Amortization of unearned compensation |
192 | 134 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in current income tax |
(32 | ) | 3,960 | |||||
Decrease in other items |
(4,447 | ) | (1,445 | ) | ||||
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
(16,002 | ) | 10,136 | |||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds on the sale of fixed assets |
1 | 26 | ||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(1,166 | ) | (804 | ) | ||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(1,165 | ) | (778 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Increase (decrease) in overdraft balances |
162 | (6,484 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from borrowings |
143,762 | 124,667 | ||||||
Reduction of borrowings |
(126,314 | ) | (122,655 | ) | ||||
Exercised stock options, net of treasury shares |
606 | 106 | ||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
18,216 | (4,366 | ) | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
1,049 | 4,992 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of the period |
8,101 | 7,505 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS END OF THE PERIOD |
$ | 9,150 | $ | 12,497 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Interest paid, including letters of credit and unused facility fees |
$ | (299 | ) | $ | (233 | ) | ||
Income taxes (paid) refunded |
$ | (32 | ) | $ | 3,591 | |||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Description of Business and Segment Information
LESCO, Inc. (LESCO or the Company) is the nations leading provider of lawn care, landscape, golf course and pest control products to the $6 billion professional green and pest control industries. Products distributed include turf control products, fertilizer, combination fertilizer and control products (combination products), grass seed, pest control products and equipment. The Company currently distributes products through 279 Service Centers, 98 Stores-on-Wheels®, 30 direct sales representatives and other direct sales efforts. The Company operates eight distribution hubs, three fertilizer blending facilities and a grass seed processing plant.
Segment Information: The Selling and Support segments reported below are the segments of the Company for which separate information is available and for which operating results are evaluated regularly by the Chief Executive Officer in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
The Company maintains separate operating statements (Four-Wall P&Ls) for each selling location. These Four-Wall P&Ls include the sales and cost of product and operating expenses necessary to operate the individual selling locations. The Selling segment operating results reflect the aggregate Four-Wall P&Ls of the selling locations adjusted for costs of zone and regional management, sales commission expense and the portion of merchant discounts not charged to the Four-Wall P&Ls.
The Support segment represents the operating results and invested capital of all non-selling locations including manufacturing facilities (blending facilities and seed processing plant), distribution hubs and the corporate office.
Below are the unaudited results for the Selling and Support segments for the three months ended March 31:
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Net sales |
||||||||
Selling |
$ | 98,054 | $ | 102,044 | ||||
Support |
| | ||||||
$ | 98,054 | $ | 102,044 | |||||
Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes |
||||||||
Selling |
$ | 5,719 | $ | 5,410 | ||||
Support |
(16,075 | ) | (12,667 | ) | ||||
$ | (10,356 | ) | $ | (7,257 | ) | |||
Capital expenditures |
||||||||
Selling |
$ | 416 | $ | 595 | ||||
Support |
750 | 209 | ||||||
$ | 1,166 | $ | 804 | |||||
Depreciation expense |
||||||||
Selling |
$ | 299 | $ | 272 | ||||
Support |
1,313 | 1,597 | ||||||
$ | 1,612 | $ | 1,869 | |||||
Intangible asset amortization expense |
||||||||
Selling |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Support |
40 | 40 | ||||||
$ | 40 | $ | 40 | |||||
Identifiable assets |
||||||||
Selling |
$ | 90,673 | $ | 89,770 | ||||
Support |
88,065 | 87,897 | ||||||
$ | 178,738 | $ | 177,667 | |||||
5
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
1. Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LESCO and its subsidiaries after elimination of intercompany transactions and accounts.
2. Earnings per Share: The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) amounts. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the quarter. Diluted EPS is based upon the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during the quarter utilizing the treasury stock method for stock options. Common share equivalents are excluded from the EPS computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect. Stock options for which the exercise price exceeds the average market price over the period have an anti-dilutive effect on EPS and, accordingly, are excluded from the calculation.
Weighted average stock options of 327,944 for the three months ended March 31, 2005, and 173,120 for the same period in 2004, were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation because they were anti-dilutive due to net losses.
3. Stock Options: The Company uses the intrinsic-value method of accounting for stock-based awards granted to employees and does not issue options below market price on the date of grant and, accordingly, does not recognize compensation expense for its stock-based awards to employees in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table reflects pro forma net loss and loss per share had the Company elected to adopt the fair value approach of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Net loss as reported |
$ | (10,673 | ) | $ | (7,952 | ) | ||
Less: stock option expense, net of tax |
(74 | ) | (133 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net loss |
$ | (10,747 | ) | $ | (8,085 | ) | ||
Loss per diluted share |
||||||||
As reported |
$ | (1.21 | ) | $ | (0.92 | ) | ||
Pro forma |
$ | (1.22 | ) | $ | (0.93 | ) | ||
Loss per basic share |
||||||||
As reported |
$ | (1.21 | ) | $ | (0.92 | ) | ||
Pro forma |
$ | (1.22 | ) | $ | (0.93 | ) |
4. Accounts Receivable:
Accounts receivable consist of the following :
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2004 | |||||||||
Supplier rebate programs |
$ | 3,135 | $ | 3,559 | $ | 12,139 | ||||||
Trade receivables |
||||||||||||
Recourse |
| 2,611 | 14 | |||||||||
Owned domestic |
6,679 | 9,705 | 4,477 | |||||||||
Owned international |
1,735 | 2,260 | 1,848 | |||||||||
Other |
931 | 706 | 1,283 | |||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(2,827 | ) | (4,929 | ) | (2,830 | ) | ||||||
$ | 9,653 | $ | 13,912 | $ | 16,931 | |||||||
6
The Company earns product discounts under various supplier rebate programs, which are recorded as accounts receivable and a reduction to the cost of inventory when earned. When the related inventory is sold, the inventory valuation reserves are recognized as reductions to cost of product.
LESCO utilizes GE Capital Financial Inc., dba GE Business Credit Services (GEBCS), for the Companys private label business credit program. Under its Credit Agreement with GEBCS, GEBCS extends commercial credit to qualified customers of LESCO and funds the program sales, less program fees and discounts, within three business days. The Credit Agreement also provides the Company the option of extending deferred payment terms to customers through the payment of incremental promotional discounts. The in-transit funds are recognized by the Company as cash equivalents. The program fees and discounts and promotional discounts are recognized as merchant discounts in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. GEBCS is the exclusive owner of the program accounts and, except for the recourse account portfolio discussed below, bears all credit losses. The initial term of the Credit Agreement is through December 30, 2008 with automatic three-year renewals unless either party terminates at least six months prior to the end of the expiration of a term.
The owned domestic credit accounts are accounts that did not qualify for sale to GEBCS or for the credit recourse portfolio. LESCO has retained the ownership and management of the owned domestic credit accounts.
The Credit Agreement does not allow for the ownership of international credit accounts by GEBCS. As such, LESCO has retained the ownership and management of international accounts. All international accounts are denominated in U.S. dollars.
GEBCS has sole discretion under the Credit Agreement to approve or decline prospective account holders. LESCO may request GEBCS to include declined accounts in a portfolio of credit recourse accounts. LESCO bears all credit losses on credit recourse accounts and pays a fee to GEBCS to manage the credit recourse portfolio. LESCO did not recognize the initial sale of recourse accounts to GEBCS as of December 30, 2003. Therefore, all recourse receivable balances that existed at December 30, 2003 (the date of the GEBCS transaction) are recognized as accounts receivable by the Company, along with a corresponding borrowing from GEBCS. All of these balances were subsequently collected by GEBCS and there is no remaining balance at March 31, 2005. Sales activity on recourse accounts subsequent to December 30, 2003 is not recognized on the Companys balance sheets. A reconciliation of total recourse account balances to the receivable portion owned by the Company and recorded in the balance sheets is as follows:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2004 | |||||||||
Total recourse account balances |
$ | 5,221 | $ | 5,973 | $ | 4,679 | ||||||
Accounts owned by GEBCS |
(5,221 | ) | (3,362 | ) | (4,665 | ) | ||||||
Recourse receivables owned by LESCO |
$ | | $ | 2,611 | $ | 14 | ||||||
In the allowance for doubtful accounts, the Company provides for expected losses from all owned receivables and GEBCS-owned recourse accounts. Expected losses are estimated based upon the number of days the accounts are past due, historical loss experience of the Company, historical loss experience of credit portfolios with characteristics similar to the Companys portfolio and the current business environment.
5. Inventories:
Inventories consist of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2004 | |||||||||
Finished goods and purchased inventories |
||||||||||||
Selling locations |
$ | 68,307 | $ | 61,016 | $ | 52,063 | ||||||
Distribution hubs and plants |
45,616 | 43,589 | 35,119 | |||||||||
Capitalized procurement, warehousing and distribution costs |
10,679 | 8,469 | 8,512 | |||||||||
Less: Markdown, shrink and vendor discount reserves |
(2,380 | ) | (1,217 | ) | (3,338 | ) | ||||||
Inventory held on consignment |
(8,757 | ) | (8,003 | ) | (6,919 | ) | ||||||
113,465 | 103,854 | 85,437 | ||||||||||
Raw Materials |
16,681 | 11,007 | 15,145 | |||||||||
$ | 130,146 | $ | 114,861 | $ | 100,582 | |||||||
7
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (First In, First Out cost method) or market. Consignment inventory is considered purchased at time of sale while, concurrently, cost of product is recognized. Procurement, warehousing and distribution costs to bring the products to market are capitalized to inventory on hand and expensed to distribution cost when the inventory is sold. A markdown reserve is provided for markdown of inventory to net realizable value. Shrink reserves are recorded for expected inventory shrink and earned supplier discounts of inventory remaining on hand.
6. Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Buildings are depreciated over 15 to 20 years, and machinery, equipment and other depreciable assets are depreciated over three to 12 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the life of the initial lease term, which typically is five years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Additions and improvements are capitalized.
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company sold its Avon Lake, Ohio distribution facility for $1.5 million in cash. Based on the remaining net book value of the assets sold, this resulted in a loss on sale of less than $0.1 million. The distribution operations for customer orders previously fulfilled from the Avon Lake facility were transferred to a third party logistics provider based in Columbus, Ohio.
The Company currently retains certain properties of demised operations that are being held for sale. There is $49,000 recorded as an asset for these properties. All future costs incurred to prepare these sites for sale, including environmental testing and environmental remediation costs will be capitalized up to the realizable market value of each respective property. Other assets held for sale of $274,000 were sold in 2004 incurring a $264,000 loss on sale.
In January 2005, LESCO announced that it retained Western Reserve Partners LLC to continue and advance its exploration of supply chain alternatives, including the possibility of the disposition of all or a portion of its distribution and manufacturing assets that had a net book value of approximately $15 million at March 31, 2005. The Company's goal is to sell these assets to a financial or strategic buyer and enter into a long-term supply contract with the buyer before the end of 2005.
Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following:
March 31, 2005 | March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling | Selling | Selling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Locations | Support | Total | Locations | Support | Total | Locations | Support | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land |
$ | | $ | 600 | $ | 600 | $ | | $ | 834 | $ | 834 | $ | | $ | 600 | $ | 600 | ||||||||||||||||||
Buildings and improvements |
2,943 | 18,238 | 21,181 | 1,916 | 21,596 | 23,512 | 1,533 | 19,150 | 20,683 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
4,098 | 19,708 | 23,806 | 3,799 | 20,493 | 24,292 | 4,177 | 20,459 | 24,636 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
5,961 | 30,780 | 36,741 | 6,099 | 29,537 | 35,636 | 6,783 | 29,334 | 36,117 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
13,002 | 69,326 | 82,328 | 11,814 | 72,460 | 84,274 | 12,493 | 69,543 | 82,036 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(7,456 | ) | (49,366 | ) | (56,822 | ) | (7,096 | ) | (46,775 | ) | (53,871 | ) | (7,171 | ) | (48,846 | ) | (56,017 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 5,546 | $ | 19,960 | $ | 25,506 | $ | 4,718 | $ | 25,685 | $ | 30,403 | $ | 5,322 | $ | 20,697 | $ | 26,019 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense is included in the following:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Cost of product |
$ | 485 | $ | 517 | ||||
Distribution cost |
168 | 242 | ||||||
Selling expense |
299 | 272 | ||||||
General and administrative expense |
660 | 838 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,612 | $ | 1,869 | ||||
8
7. Borrowings
Borrowings consist of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2004 | |||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | 24,751 | $ | 17,553 | $ | 7,303 | ||||||
Long-term: |
||||||||||||
Industrial revenue bonds |
$ | | $ | 5,875 | $ | | ||||||
Revolving Credit Facility
On December 30, 2003, the Company entered into a $50 million Revolving Credit Facility (the Facility) which replaced a prior credit facility. The Facility matures December 30, 2006 and is secured by inventory, owned receivables, equipment, investment interests, real property interests, and general intangibles including intellectual property. The Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% to 2.5%, based on the level of borrowings, and requires the payment of a facility fee ranging from 0.4% to 0.5% on the unused portion of availability. Availability under the Facility is determined by a borrowing base formula calculated on eligible inventory. As of March 31, 2005, there was $46.5 million available under the borrowing base formula, with unused borrowing capacity of $18.4 million. At March 31, 2005, the Company had borrowings of $24.8 million on the facility. Letters of credit, up to a maximum of $20 million, are also available under the Facility and are considered outstanding borrowings when calculating the unused portion of availability. Letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $3.3 million were outstanding as of March 31, 2005. Letter of credit fees range from 2.0% to 2.5% with an issuance fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.150%.
The Facility requires the maintenance of certain covenants, with the only financial covenant being the fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with the Facility covenants as of March 31, 2005.
8. Asset Rationalization and Severance Expense
Major components of the remaining reserves and accruals for asset rationalization and severance expense as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are as follows:
Asset Rationalization Accrual | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lease | Other Exit | Severance | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Costs | Costs | Total | Accrual | Total | |||||||||||||||
Asset rationalization and severance
accruals at December 31, 2004 |
$ | 228 | $ | 222 | $ | 450 | $ | 209 | $ | 659 | ||||||||||
2005 Activity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
| | | 9 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
Utilized/payments |
(40 | ) | (54 | ) | (94 | ) | (87 | ) | (181 | ) | ||||||||||
Asset rationalization reserves and
severance accruals at March 31, 2005 |
$ | 188 | $ | 168 | $ | 356 | $ | 131 | $ | 487 | ||||||||||
9
9. Detail of Certain Balance Sheets Accounts
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | 2004 | |||||||||
Other current assets: |
||||||||||||
Other prepaids |
$ | 1,860 | $ | 1,761 | $ | 1,426 | ||||||
Prepaid insurance |
991 | 824 | 1,513 | |||||||||
Notes receivable |
187 | 592 | 187 | |||||||||
Assets held for sale |
49 | 274 | | |||||||||
$ | 3,087 | $ | 3,451 | $ | 3,126 | |||||||
Other non-current assets: |
||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
$ | 454 | $ | 1,496 | $ | 443 | ||||||
Store deposits |
539 | 574 | 550 | |||||||||
Deferred financing charges |
121 | 387 | 172 | |||||||||
Miscellaneous deposits |
44 | 86 | 69 | |||||||||
Other prepaids |
38 | | | |||||||||
$ | 1,196 | $ | 2,543 | $ | 1,234 | |||||||
Accounts payable: |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 70,035 | $ | 65,424 | $ | 50,519 | ||||||
Overdraft balances |
6,024 | 5,370 | 5,838 | |||||||||
Accounts payable to GEBCS for recourse accounts receivable |
| 2,611 | 14 | |||||||||
$ | 76,059 | $ | 73,405 | $ | 56,371 | |||||||
Accrued liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accrued non-income taxes |
$ | 3,182 | $ | 4,422 | $ | 3,043 | ||||||
Commissions and management bonuses |
1,747 | 1,843 | 6,008 | |||||||||
Salaries and wages |
1,493 | 1,238 | 469 | |||||||||
Insurance hospitalization and workers compensation |
2,387 | 2,270 | 2,794 | |||||||||
Asset rationalization |
356 | 986 | 450 | |||||||||
Insurance property and casualty |
1,580 | 1,049 | 1,897 | |||||||||
Severance |
131 | 271 | 209 | |||||||||
Vendor contract termination |
2,849 | | 3,287 | |||||||||
Other |
5,814 | 4,968 | 6,027 | |||||||||
$ | 19,539 | $ | 17,047 | $ | 24,184 | |||||||
10
10. Detail of Certain Statements of Operations Accounts
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Net sales: |
||||||||
Gross sales |
$ | 99,811 | $ | 102,864 | ||||
Agency sales |
(322 | ) | | |||||
Freight revenue |
163 | 306 | ||||||
Customer discounts, rebates and sales adjustments |
(1,598 | ) | (1,126 | ) | ||||
$ | 98,054 | $ | 102,044 | |||||
Merchant discounts and provisions for doubtful accounts: |
||||||||
Merchant discounts |
||||||||
Multi-purpose credit programs |
$ | (300 | ) | $ | (306 | ) | ||
Private label business credit programs |
(1,118 | ) | (1,047 | ) | ||||
Private label promotional discounts |
(574 | ) | (209 | ) | ||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
(30 | ) | | |||||
Customer finance revenue |
85 | 103 | ||||||
Other |
(113 | ) | (169 | ) | ||||
$ | (2,050 | ) | $ | (1,628 | ) | |||
Other expense: |
||||||||
Loss on sale/disposal of fixed assets |
(66 | ) | | |||||
Other |
(36 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
$ | (102 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | |||
Other income: |
||||||||
Vendor payment discounts |
166 | 129 | ||||||
Other |
13 | 38 | ||||||
Gain on sale/disposal of fixed assets |
| 13 | ||||||
$ | 179 | $ | 180 | |||||
11
LESCO, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Organization of Information
Managements Discussion and Analysis provides a narrative on the Companys financial performance and condition that should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements. It includes the following sections:
| Overview | |||
| Consolidated Results | |||
| Business Segment Results | |||
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | |||
| Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates | |||
| Forward Looking Statements |
OVERVIEW
LESCO is the nation's leading provider of lawn care, landscape, golf course and pest control products to the $6 billion professional green and pest control industries. The professional users of our products include lawn care and landscape firms and the employees of a variety of commercial, governmental, institutional and industrial establishments, including golf courses, sod farms, airports, cemeteries, professional sports organizations, universities, schools, commercial properties and numerous other organizations that use in-house employees to maintain lawns, grounds and gardens along with pest management professionals.
We track our customers through two customer sectors: Lawn Care and Golf.
Gross sales for these sectors for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Lawn Care |
$ | 84.3 | $ | 85.7 | ||||
Golf |
15.5 | 17.2 | ||||||
$ | 99.8 | $ | 102.9 | |||||
The separation of our customers into these two sectors is important as distribution to the sectors is vastly different and their growth prospects vary significantly.
Our Lawn Care sector includes all non-golf related customers and is dominated by lawn care and landscape firms. Historically, industry-wide distribution of products into this sector has been fragmented and inefficient. We believe that our model of Service Centers and direct sales provides efficiency to the sectors distribution channels through easily accessible, strategically positioned real estate, where we provide agronomic expertise through our 279 Service Centers and direct sales associates with products specifically targeted to the Lawn Care sector. We estimate the market for our consumable Lawn Care products at $6.0 billion of which $2.8 billion is in the professional sector and $3.2 billion is in the consumer sector. Independent research indicates that organic growth in the industry is expected to exceed 7% annually for the next several years due to the aging of the baby boomers and their increasing desire to contract lawn care professionals, the higher number of two-income families and continued time constraints on consumers.
The golf industry is a smaller market estimated at $1.4 billion and is not expected to grow significantly during the near future, nor do we believe our opportunities are as great in this sector as they are in the Lawn Care sector. Over the past few years, the industry has experienced a decline in annual rounds of golf played, which has decreased the budgets of golf course superintendents. The ability to capture incremental market share is limited as distribution of products to the golf industry is dominated by a few national and regional distributors. However, we anticipate that we will be able to extend our presence in under-serviced markets, as we implement a more efficient and lower cost Stores-on-Wheels operating model, which we believe will allow us to expand our fleet and our customer base. We currently operate 98 Stores-on-Wheels.
12
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Sales: The following table provides supplemental detail of sales by customer sector and transacting selling locations:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Other | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service | Selling | Service | Selling | Service | Selling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Centers | Locations | Total | Centers | Locations | Total | Centers | Locations | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lawn care |
$ | 64.8 | $ | 19.5 | $ | 84.3 | $ | 65.2 | $ | 20.5 | $ | 85.7 | (0.6 | )% | (4.9 | )% | (1.6 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
Golf |
4.3 | 11.2 | 15.5 | 3.7 | 13.5 | 17.2 | 16.2 | (17.0 | ) | (9.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross sales |
$ | 69.1 | $ | 30.7 | 99.8 | $ | 68.9 | $ | 34.0 | 102.9 | 0.3 | % | (9.7 | )% | (3.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Agency sales |
(0.3 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freight revenue |
0.2 | 0.3 | (33.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer discounts, rebates and sales adjustments | (1.6 | ) | (1.2 | ) | 33.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 98.1 | $ | 102.0 | (3.8 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Centers: Service Center gross sales reflect sales transacted through our 275 Service Centers in operation as of March 31, 2005, including one new Service Center opened during the first quarter 2005. The total increase of 0.3% reflects a same-store sales (excluding stores opened in 2005 and 2004) decrease of 4.1% and an increase of 4.9% from new (2005 and 2004 openings) Service Center sales of $3.4 million. The comparable-store sales decrease was due to the extended cold weather and snowfall in March 2005, which delayed sales into April. Same-store sales for the first two months of 2005 increased 3.3%. We plan to open 30 to 35 Service Centers in 2005. Below is a summary of first quarter 2005 and 2004 Service Center Sales by period opened:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | Variance | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | Dollars | % | ||||||||||||
Stores opened: | ||||||||||||||||
Prior to 2003 |
$ | 62.1 | $ | 65.5 | $ | (3.4 | ) | (5.2 | )% | |||||||
2003 |
3.6 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 20.0 | ||||||||||||
Comparative stores |
65.7 | 68.5 | (2.8 | ) | (4.1 | ) | ||||||||||
2004 |
3.4 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 750.0 | ||||||||||||
2005 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 69.1 | $ | 68.9 | $ | 0.2 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||
Other Selling Locations: All other gross sales reflect sales transacted through our direct sales programs and our Stores-on-Wheels. The decrease of 9.7% is attributable to the year-over-year decline in sales to retail and international customers along with a 17.0% decrease in sales to customers in the golf industry as inclement weather has also delayed the start of business with golf customers located in Northeast and Midwest regions of the country. We continue to evaluate the return on investment relative to our contract accounts and have instituted disciplines to assure contracts meet acceptable return thresholds. This program has, on occasion, resulted in lost contract sales, and we will continue to cull national account sales that do not produce an acceptable level of return on our investment.
Agency Sales, Freight Revenue and Customer Discounts, Rebates and Sales Adjustments: The Company has entered into agency agreements with certain of its suppliers whereby the Company operates as a sales agent of those suppliers. The suppliers retain title to their merchandise until it is sold by the Company and determine the prices at which LESCO can sell the suppliers merchandise. As such, the Company recognizes sales on a net basis and records only its product margin as revenue. Therefore, the $0.3 million of agency sales for first quarter 2005 represent the portion of gross revenue that exceeds the Companys net product margin. Freight revenue, which represents fees charged to customers in sales transactions for shipping and handling, remained relatively flat on a year-over-year basis. Customer discounts and rebates declined slightly in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 as the Company remains stringent on its qualifications for its customers to obtain rebates.
Gross Profit on Sales:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Dollars | % of Net Sales | Dollars | % of Net Sales | ||||||||||||
Product margin |
$ | 33.0 | 33.7 | % | $ | 33.1 | 32.4 | % | ||||||||
Distribution cost |
(9.7 | ) | (9.9 | ) | (9.5 | ) | (9.3 | ) | ||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 23.3 | 23.8 | % | $ | 23.6 | 23.1 | % | ||||||||
Product margin improved 130 basis points in the first quarter of 2005 compared to the like period in 2004. The product margin improvement was achieved through expanding margins in the Companys combination, control and grass seed product categories. This expansion in product margin is despite a year-over-year comparative price increase for urea of approximately 14% for the first
13
quarter of 2005. Urea, our largest single purchased product or raw material, is used as the nitrogen source for blended fertilizers and combination products. Urea is a second derivative of natural gas and its cost has increased with the increased cost of natural gas. Urea can represent approximately 8% to 10% of our cost of sales. For 2005, we entered into a contract with our urea supplier to fix the cost of a majority of our urea needs at a price reflecting the prevailing market. The new contract rate for urea purchases increased approximately 14% over the prior year contract rate.
In the first quarter of 2005, our warehouse and distribution costs increased slightly over the same period in 2004. Due to the year-over-year sales decline, we deleveraged the fixed costs included in these operating expenses. As a percentage of net sales, these costs increased to 9.9% in the first quarter of 2005 from 9.3% for the same quarter in 2004.
Operating Expenses:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of Net | % of Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Dollars | Sales | Dollars | Sales | Dollars | % | Basis Points | |||||||||||||||||||||
Selling expense |
$ | 23.8 | 24.3 | % | $ | 21.8 | 21.4 | % | $ | 2.0 | 9.2 | % | 290 bps | |||||||||||||||
Merchant discounts/provision
for doubtful accounts |
2.1 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 29.6 | 50 bps | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 25.9 | 26.4 | % | $ | 23.4 | 23.0 | % | $ | 2.5 | 10.6 | % | 340 bps | ||||||||||||||||
Selling Expense
Selling expense includes all operating expenses of Service Centers and Stores-on-Wheels, direct sales, sales management, customer service and marketing expense. Approximately $1.2 million of the $2.0 million increase in expense is due to incremental operating costs for Service Centers opened in 2005 and 2004. A portion of the remaining increase on a year-over year basis is due to various employee incentive and training programs targeted to enhance the Companys focus on increasing sales and profitability.
Merchant Discounts and Provision for Doubtful Accounts
As a percentage of net sales, merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts expense increased 50 basis points year-over-year. In December 2003, we entered into a private label business credit program agreement with GEBCS and sold approximately $57 million of our trade accounts receivable portfolio to GEBCS and in 2004, we sold an additional $6 million of trade accounts receivable to GEBCS. For the first quarter of 2005, total merchant discount expense, including GEBCS, for normal payment terms was 1.5% of net sales. Promotional discount expense was an incremental 0.6% of net sales including approximately 0.3% for extended payment terms for certain customer accounts with the majority incurred for a single, large national sales account. In the first quarter of 2004, discount expense for normal payment terms was 1.4% of net sales while promotional discount expense was an additional 0.2% of net sales.
General and Administrative Expense:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | Change | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
$ | 7.8 | $ | 7.3 | $ | 0.5 |
General and administrative expense increased by $0.5 million in first quarter 2005 to $7.8 million, or 7.9% of net sales, compared to $7.3 million, or 7.1% of net sales, in first quarter 2004. The increase in expense year-over-year is due to the timing of the incurrence of certain payroll taxes related to employee commissions and management bonus payments. Additionally, the Company has incurred incremental expenses for license fees to operate in various states along with initial costs related to the proposed transaction to sell its manufacturing and distribution assets. The increase in these costs was partially mitigated by an approximate $0.3 million savings in corporate headquarter expenses as the Company reduced its lease obligation for its corporate offices in the fourth quarter of 2004.
14
Pre-Opening Expense
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | Change | |||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
$ | 0.2 | $ | 0.3 | $ | (0.1 | ) | |||||
Number of Service Centers opened
during the period |
1 | 9 | (8 | ) |
Pre-opening expense decreased $0.1 million in first quarter 2005 compared to first quarter 2004 results. Pre-opening expense per new Service Center remained consistent between years. Pre-opening expense, which consists primarily of grand opening advertising, payroll, supplies, distribution and storage costs, is expensed as incurred and, thus, some costs were incurred in the first quarter of 2005 for stores that are expected to open in the second quarter.
Other Expense/(Income):
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | Change | |||||||||
Other expense |
$ | 0.1 | $ | $ | 0.1 | |||||||
Other income |
(0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | | |||||||
$ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 0.1 | |||||
The increase in other expense is primarily due to a minor loss that was incurred on the sale of assets that were no longer utilized in operating the business.
Interest Expense, Net:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | Change | |||||||||
Interest expense, net |
$ | 0.3 | $ | 0.4 | $ | (0.1 | ) |
Interest expense, net remained relatively flat in the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the same quarter in 2004. While the outstanding debt at the end of the first quarter was higher in 2005 compared to 2004 and the interest rate was higher year-over-year, the average debt during the first quarter of 2005 was lower versus the same period last year.
Pre-Tax Earnings:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | Change | |||||||||
Loss before taxes |
$ | (10.7 | ) | $ | (7.6 | ) | $ | (3.1 | ) |
In the first quarter 2005, the Company opened one Service Center location to augment the 48 new Service Center openings in 2004 and 2003. Management views new Service Centers as the primary method to leverage our cost base and grow earnings consistently over the long term. The Company currently plans to open 13-16 new Service Centers in the second quarter of 2005. Below are the operating results for the first quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 for all Service Centers opened during 2003, 2004 and the first quarter of 2005:
15
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class of 2005 | Class of 2004 | Class of 2003 | Class of 2004 | Class of 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | (1 Store) | (27 Stores) | (21 Stores) | Total | (9 Stores) | (21 Stores) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 40 | $ | 3,392 | $ | 3,611 | $ | 7,043 | $ | 450 | $ | 2,957 | $ | 3,407 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of product |
(28 | ) | (2,322 | ) | (2,439 | ) | (4,789 | ) | (305 | ) | (2,020 | ) | (2,325 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Distribution cost |
(6 | ) | (214 | ) | (206 | ) | (426 | ) | (96 | ) | (154 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit on sales |
6 | 856 | 966 | 1,828 | 49 | 783 | 832 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Selling expense |
(74 | ) | (1,312 | ) | (1,038 | ) | (2,424 | ) | (229 | ) | (1,046 | ) | (1,275 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Merchant discount expense |
(1 | ) | (40 | ) | (53 | ) | (94 | ) | (6 | ) | (40 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
(157 | ) | | | (157 | ) | (312 | ) | | (312 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Loss before
interest and taxes |
$ | (226 | ) | $ | (496 | ) | $ | (125 | ) | $ | (847 | ) | $ | (498 | ) | $ | (303 | ) | $ | (801 | ) | |||||||
As a result of the foregoing factors, including the difficult weather conditions in March 2005 along with the operating results of new Service Centers opened in 2003, 2004 and the first quarter of 2005 that have not yet matured in their operating results, the Company had a pre-tax loss of $10.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 compared to a pre-tax loss of $7.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
Income Taxes and Net Loss:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | 2005 | 2004 | Change | |||||||||
Loss before income tax (provision) benefit |
$ | (10.7 | ) | $ | (7.6 | ) | $ | (3.1 | ) | |||
Income tax (provision) benefit: |
||||||||||||
Current |
| (0.4 | ) | 0.4 | ||||||||
Deferred |
3.5 | 3.3 | 0.2 | |||||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
(3.5 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||||
| (0.4 | ) | 0.4 | |||||||||
Net Loss |
$ | (10.7 | ) | $ | (8.0 | ) | $ | (2.7 | ) | |||
Loss per common share: |
||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | (1.21 | ) | $ | (0.92 | ) | ||||||
Basic |
$ | (1.21 | ) | $ | (0.92 | ) | ||||||
The net loss for the first quarter 2005 was $10.7 million, or $(1.21) per diluted share, compared to a net loss of $8.0 million, or $(0.92) per diluted share, for the first quarter 2004.
In accordance with the provisions of FAS 109, in the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a charge to establish a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets, including amounts related to its net operating loss carryforwards. The Company intends to maintain a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards until sufficient positive evidence exists to support a reversal of some portion or the remainder of the allowance. Until such time, except for minor state and local provisions and adjustments to federal tax refunds, the Company expects to have no reported tax provision or benefit, net of valuation allowance adjustments. In the first quarter of 2005, LESCO increased its valuation allowance $3.5 million. In the first quarter of 2004, the Company adjusted previously estimated federal tax refunds by $0.4 million and increased its valuation allowance an additional $3.3 million.
For first quarter 2005, the impact of the valuation allowance decreased the Companys income tax benefit, and increased its net loss by $3.5 million. Because the Company cannot recognize a tax benefit at its estimated 39% effective tax rate due to its current accounting for its deferred tax assets, its loss has been increased approximately $0.47 per diluted share. For the first quarter 2004, the Companys loss per diluted share was increased approximately $0.38 due to the same tax circumstances as in 2005.
16
BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS
We manage LESCOs business utilizing two business segments Selling and Support.
Selling Segment
We maintain Four-Wall P&Ls for each of our selling locations (Service Centers, Stores-on-Wheels, direct sales representatives and all other direct selling efforts). These Four-Wall P&Ls include the sales, cost of sales and operating expenses (including payroll, benefits, rent, utilities, freight in-bound to selling locations and out-bound to customers) necessary to operate the individual selling locations. The Selling segment operating results reflect the aggregate Four-Wall P&Ls of selling locations adjusted for costs of zone and regional management, sales commission expense and the portion of merchant discounts not charged to the Four-Wall P&Ls.
We allocate resources, including working, fixed and leased capital, to existing and potential selling locations based upon projected sales and return on invested capital (ROIC). We define ROIC as the percentage calculated by dividing net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) by invested capital. For the Selling segment, we calculate ROIC as follows:
ROIC = | NOPAT / Invested Capital | |||
NOPAT = | Selling Segment Operating Results X 61% (1 effective tax rate) |
|||
Invested Capital = | Accounts Receivable (excluding rebate receivable, see Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements); plus | |||
Inventory (excluding capitalized distribution and procurement costs, markdown and shrink reserves and credit for inventory held on consignment see Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements); plus | ||||
Fixed Capital (see Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements) |
Our measures of ROIC may not be the same as other similarly titled captions used by other companies. For example, we do not capitalize operating leases or utilize average invested capital over given periods.
17
Selling Segment Operating Results
For the Period Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 98.1 | $ | 102.0 | ||||
Cost of product |
(62.7 | ) | (69.4 | ) | ||||
Distribution cost |
(5.5 | ) | (5.3 | ) | ||||
Gross profit on sales |
29.9 | 27.3 | ||||||
Selling expense |
(21.9 | ) | (20.0 | ) | ||||
Merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts |
(2.1 | ) | (1.6 | ) | ||||
Pre-opening expense |
(0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) Three months ended March 31, |
$ | 5.7 | $ | 5.4 | ||||
EBIT Nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
46.2 | 52.8 | ||||||
Adjustments to nine months EBIT: |
||||||||
Merchant discounts (a) |
| (4.4 | ) | |||||
Adjusted EBIT Nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | 46.2 | $ | 48.4 | ||||
Adjusted EBIT Rolling 12 months ended March 31, |
$ | 51.9 | $ | 53.8 | ||||
Adjusted NOPAT Rolling 12 months ended March 31, |
$ | 31.7 | $ | 32.8 | ||||
Invested capital at period end |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 6.5 | $ | 10.4 | ||||
Inventory |
68.3 | 61.0 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
5.5 | 4.7 | ||||||
$ | 80.3 | $ | 76.1 | |||||
ROIC |
39.4 | % | 43.1 | % | ||||
(a) | Merchant discounts for GEBCS fees were not incurred in 2003; however, the sale of accounts receivable is reflected in the March 31, 2004 accounts receivable balance used to calculate ROIC for the rolling 12 months ended March 31, 2004. As a result, the 2003 EBIT and NOPAT is adjusted to reflect merchant discount expense as though the GEBCS transaction occurred on January 1, 2003. |
Support Segment
The Support segment includes the operating results and invested capital of all non-selling locations including manufacturing (blending facilities and seed processing plant), distribution hubs (including in-bound freight costs to the distribution hubs), and corporate costs (including corporate management of sales, marketing, customer service, accounting and finance, human resources, information systems, etc.). We believe that these costs are essential to managing the selling locations and to managing a public company, but are not costs that directly translate into incremental sales or positive ROIC. Therefore, resources are only allocated to the Support segment if the result is a net reduction in expenses or the allocation is necessary for the maintenance of facilities, support of the expansion of selling locations, maintaining the corporate structure or is mandated by law or governmental order. Below is the non-GAAP, adjusted ROIC for the Support Segment which excludes various charges recorded in 2004 and 2003.
18
Support Segment Operating Results
For the Period Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Cost of product (a) |
(2.3 | ) | 1.0 | |||||
Distribution cost (b) |
(4.2 | ) | (4.8 | ) | ||||
Gross loss on sales |
(6.5 | ) | (3.8 | ) | ||||
Selling expense (c) |
(1.9 | ) | (1.8 | ) | ||||
General & administrative expense |
(7.8 | ) | (7.3 | ) | ||||
Other expense (d) |
(0.1 | ) | | |||||
Other income (d) |
0.2 | 0.2 | ||||||
EBIT Three months ended March 31, |
$ | (16.1 | ) | $ | (12.7 | ) | ||
EBIT Nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | (43.5 | ) | $ | (44.2 | ) | ||
Adjustments to nine months EBIT: |
||||||||
Corporate relocation expense (e) |
6.9 | | ||||||
Hurricane/flood expense (e) |
1.2 | | ||||||
Vendor contract termination (including cost of inventory markdown) (e) |
5.2 | | ||||||
Early retirement of debt (f) |
| 2.3 | ||||||
Loss from sale of accounts receivable (f) |
| 4.6 | ||||||
Adjusted EBIT nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | (30.2 | ) | $ | (37.3 | ) | ||
Adjusted EBIT Rolling 12 months ended March 31, |
$ | (46.3 | ) | $ | (50.0 | ) | ||
Adjusted NOPAT Rolling 12 months ended March 31, |
$ | (28.2 | ) | $ | (30.5 | ) | ||
Invested capital |
$ | 81.4 | $ | 87.0 | ||||
Less: Selling segment invested capital |
(80.3 | ) | (76.1 | ) | ||||
Total support segment invested capital |
$ | 1.1 | $ | 10.9 | ||||
Adjusted ROIC |
(2567.5 | )% | (279.8 | )% | ||||
(a) | Includes various manufacturing and procurement costs reduced by suppliers rebates. | |
(b) | Reflects warehousing expense and freight costs incurred to transport product from manufacturing facilities to hubs. | |
(c) | Represents corporate costs incurred for marketing, customer service and sales management. | |
(d) | Includes all other non-selling, miscellaneous income and expense items that are not incurred in the ordinary course of business at the Service Centers, Stores-on-Wheels or direct sales channel. | |
(e) | Adjusted EBIT and adjusted NOPAT for 2004 exclude charges for corporate relocation, expenses related to hurricane and flood damage, and costs associated with the early termination of a vendor supply contract. | |
(f) | Adjusted EBIT and adjusted NOPAT for 2003 exclude charges incurred for the sale of the Companys accounts receivable portfolio to GEBCS in December 2003 along with the expense associated with the early termination of debt. |
As the Support segment operates at a negative ROIC, the Selling segment must provide an adequate return in order for the Consolidated Company results to generate a positive ROIC. The Selling segments results continue to be sufficient to support a positive adjusted ROIC on a Consolidated basis as reflected below:
19
Consolidated Operating Results
For the Period Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Net sales |
$ | 98.1 | $ | 102.0 | ||||
Cost of product |
(65.0 | ) | (68.9 | ) | ||||
Distribution cost |
(9.7 | ) | (9.5 | ) | ||||
Gross profit on sales |
23.4 | 23.6 | ||||||
Selling expense |
(23.8 | ) | (21.8 | ) | ||||
General & administrative expense |
(7.8 | ) | (7.3 | ) | ||||
Merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts |
(2.0 | ) | (1.6 | ) | ||||
Pre-opening expense |
(0.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Other expense |
(0.1 | ) | | |||||
Other income |
0.1 | 0.2 | ||||||
EBIT Three months ended March 31, |
$ | (10.4 | ) | $ | (7.2 | ) | ||
EBIT Nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | 2.7 | $ | 8.6 | ||||
Adjustments to nine months EBIT: |
||||||||
Corporate relocation expense |
6.9 | | ||||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
1.2 | | ||||||
Vendor contract termination (including cost of inventory markdown) |
5.2 | | ||||||
Merchant discounts |
| (4.4 | ) | |||||
Early retirement of debt |
| 2.3 | ||||||
Loss on sale of accounts receivable |
| 4.6 | ||||||
Adjusted EBIT Nine months ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | 16.0 | $ | 11.1 | ||||
Adjusted EBIT Rolling 12 months ended March 31, |
$ | 5.6 | $ | 3.9 | ||||
Adjusted NOPAT Rolling 12 months ended March 31, |
$ | 3.4 | $ | 2.4 | ||||
Invested capital |
||||||||
Debt |
24.8 | 23.4 | ||||||
Equity |
56.6 | 63.6 | ||||||
Total Invested capital |
$ | 81.4 | $ | 87.0 | ||||
Adjusted ROIC |
4.2 | % | 2.7 | % | ||||
20
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
A summary of the change in cash and cash equivalents (see Statement of Cash Flows included in the attached Consolidated Financial Statements) is as follows:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Cash (used in) provided by operations |
$ | (16.0 | ) | $ | 10.1 | |||
Cash used in investing activities |
(1.2 | ) | (0.8 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
18.2 | (4.3 | ) | |||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1.0 | $ | 5.0 | ||||
In January 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued additional guidance for the reporting of cash flows from the sale of accounts receivable. As such, the cash generated from the sale of our accounts receivable is now reflected in the Operating Activities section of our cash flows statement when, historically, it was reflected in Financing Activities. Below is a reconciliation of GAAP reported cash flows from Operations to a Non-GAAP presentation that excludes the sale of accounts receivable:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities GAAP |
$ | (16.0 | ) | $ | 10.1 | |||
Less: Cash received for sale of accounts receivable |
| (3.1 | ) | |||||
Adjusted cash (used in) provided by operating activities -
non-GAAP |
$ | (16.0 | ) | $ | 7.0 | |||
Cash was used by operations in the first quarter of 2005 as sales declined compared to the first quarter of 2004 due to the inclement weather conditions in the Midwest and Northeast regions of the country. As a result, the Companys inventories increased while its related cash payment cycle remained consistent with historical patterns. The net result was a decrease in accounts payable leverage and an increased use of cash.
Accounts payable leverage is summarized as follows:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 76.1 | $ | 73.4 | ||||
Less: Payable to GEBCS |
| (2.6 | ) | |||||
Adjusted accounts payable |
$ | 76.1 | $ | 70.8 | ||||
Inventory |
$ | 130.1 | $ | 114.9 | ||||
Accounts payable leverage |
58.5 | % | 61.6 | % | ||||
Payable to GEBCS represents the portion of the receivable portfolio sold to GEBCS on December 30, 2003 that remained uncollected by GEBCS and secured by the Company. All of these balances were subsequently collected by GEBCS and there is no remaining balance at March 31, 2005.
21
Capital Expenditures: Our first quarter 2005 capital expenditures can be summarized as follows:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
New Service Centers |
$ | 0.4 | $ | 0.6 | ||||
Manufacturing facilities and corporate systems |
0.8 | 0.2 | ||||||
$ | 1.2 | $ | 0.8 | |||||
We expect to focus our future capital needs primarily on Service Centers. We intend to open 30 to 35 units in 2005, relocate another 20 existing sites to new locations with the intent to increase customer traffic, and invest in new fixtures for our current base of stores to enhance merchandise adjacencies and improve the in-store shopping experience. We will continue to maintain information systems and manufacturing facilities. We currently estimate that ongoing, annual capital needs will range from $5 million to $6 million, which we expect to fund with cash generated from operations.
A new Service Center, on average, requires approximately $50,000 in capital cost and $150,000 of inventory, of which an estimated 50% or more is leveraged through payment terms with our suppliers. Costs incurred up to the date when the Service Center opens for business, including lease costs (pre-opening costs), are approximately $25,000 and are expensed when incurred. A new Service Center is expected to achieve break-even operating results for its second year of operations and thereafter becomes profitable. Typically, it is at least five years before a Service Center achieves a mature level of operating results.
Financing Activities
In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company entered into a $50 million Revolving Credit Facility (the Facility) which replaced a prior credit facility. The Facility matures December 30, 2006 and is secured by inventory, owned receivables, equipment, investment interests, real property interests, and general intangibles, including intellectual property. The Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% to 2.5% per annum, based on the level of borrowings, and requires the payment of a facility fee ranging from 0.4% to 0.5% per annum on the unused portion of availability. Availability under the Facility is determined by a borrowing base formula calculated on eligible inventory. As of March 31, 2005, there was $46.5 million available under the borrowing base formula with unused borrowing capacity of $18.4 million. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had borrowings of $24.8 million on the facility. Letters of credit, up to a maximum of $20 million, are also available under the Facility and are considered outstanding borrowings when calculating the unused portion of availability. Letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $3.3 million were outstanding as of March 31, 2005. Letter of credit fees range from 2.0% to 2.5% with an issuance fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.150%.
The interest rate, facility fee, letter of credit fee and letter of credit issuance fee are determined based on the Companys fixed charge coverage ratio. The Facility requires the maintenance of certain covenants, with the only financial covenant being the fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with the Facility covenants as of March 31, 2005.
We believe that the Companys financial condition continues to be strong. Together, its cash balances, other liquid assets, operating cash flows, access to debt and equity capital markets, and borrowing capacity provide adequate resources to fund short-term and long-term operating requirements and future capital expenditures related to Service Center expansion and other projects. However, the Companys operating cash flow and access to the capital markets can be impacted by factors outside of its control.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
There are no material changes to the Companys contractual obligations and commercial commitments as reported in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, long-lived assets, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting estimates, and the disclosures made herein, with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and its external auditors. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The Companys significant accounting policies are described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. This discussion and analysis of financial condition
22
contains various references and disclosures concerning our accounting policies. Additionally, we have identified each of the following as a critical accounting policy, either because it has the potential to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements, because of the significance of the financial item to which it relates, or because it requires judgment and estimation due to the uncertainty involved in measuring at a specific point in time events which will be settled in the future.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when goods are shipped to the customer and title and risk of loss passes to the customer. We have consigned inventory agreements on certain products. We report gross revenue from the sales of consigned inventory in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent. Additionally, we have agency agreements with vendors for which we recognize sales net as an agent. Sales of consigned inventory were $4.5 million and $4.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Agency commissions included in net sales were $81,000 and $0 for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable consists primarily of amounts due from vendors under purchase rebate, cooperative advertising and other contractual programs and trade receivables not financed through outside programs. The Company earns product discounts under various supplier rebate programs, which are recorded as accounts receivable and credited to inventory valuation reserves when earned. The Company provides for expected losses from all owned and recourse accounts in the allowance for doubtful accounts. Expected losses are estimated based upon the number of days the accounts are past due, historical loss experience of the Company, historical loss experience of credit portfolios with characteristics similar to the Companys portfolio and the current business environment. Bad debt expense recognized for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $30,000 and $0, respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are valued principally at the lower of cost (First In, First Out cost method) or market. Procurement, warehousing and distribution costs are capitalized to inventory on hand and expensed to distribution cost when the inventory is sold. Vendor rebates earned on purchases are recorded as a reduction to inventory on hand and recognized when the inventory is sold. The Company maintains an inventory life cycle program which requires the classification of all Stock Keeping Units (SKUs) into one of five categories: active, watch, phase out, discontinued and liquidated. SKUs identified as discontinued will be progressively marked-down to expected net realizable value over specific periods until the costs are marked down to zero. At that point, the products are liquidated and purged from the inventory system. Estimated net realizable value of 20% of cost is based on historical sales of discontinued inventory. We maintain a reserve for inventory shrink on a specific location basis. This reserve is based on historical Company-wide experience of 0.2% of sales until the location obtains two physical inventory audits performed by a third-party inventory control organization. The site-specific reserve rate is then adjusted to reflect the average shrink rate from the two physical inventory counts. Actual shrink at the time of each physical inventory count is charged against the reserve.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the liability method whereby income taxes are recognized during the fiscal year in which transactions enter into the determination of financial statement income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company assesses the recoverability of its deferred tax assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). In accordance with that standard, the Company recorded a $9.6 million valuation allowance equal to its net deferred tax assets, including amounts related to its net operating loss carryforwards, as of March 31, 2005. The Company intends to maintain a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of some portion or the remainder of the allowance. Until such time, the Company will have no reported tax provision, net of valuation allowance adjustments. Any future decision to reverse a portion or all of the remaining valuation allowance will be based on consideration of several factors including, but not limited to, the Companys expectations regarding future taxable income and the Companys cumulative income or loss in the then most recent three-year period. In the event the Company was to determine, based on the existence of sufficient positive evidence, that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, a reduction of the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made.
23
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by determining whether the amortization of the remaining balance over its remaining useful life can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows. If impairment exists, the carrying amount of the related asset is reduced to fair value.
Accrued Liabilities
Certain accrued liabilities, including employee health insurance and workers compensation, are estimated based on historical experience and lag analysis due to the difference between the time the expense is incurred and when the expense is paid. A valuation analysis is performed to estimate the accrual required for property and casualty insurance claims expense. Accrued environmental costs are estimated based on the Companys previous environmental contamination and remediation experience along with site-specific conditions.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements included in this report are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties and which are based on managements current beliefs, assumptions and expectations. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of predictive or future tense terms such as anticipate, estimate, expect, believe, project, may, will or similar terms. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Companys actual results may differ materially from those stated, implied or anticipated in the forward-looking statements, as a result of a number of factors that include, but are not limited to, the Companys ability to add new Service Centers in accordance with its plans, which can be affected by local zoning and other governmental regulations and its ability to find favorable store locations, to negotiate favorable leases, to hire qualified individuals to operate the Service Centers, and to integrate new Service Centers into the Companys systems; competitive factors in the Companys business, including pricing pressures; lack of availability or instability in the cost of raw materials which affects the costs of certain products; the Companys ability to impose price increases on customers without a significant loss in revenues; potential rate increases by third-party carriers which affects the cost of delivery of products; potential regulations; the Companys ability to effectively manufacture, market and distribute new products; the success of the Companys operating plans; regional weather conditions; the condition of the industry and the economy; the Companys ability to consummate a transaction regarding its manufacturing and distribution assets on acceptable terms and conditions; the possibility that the court could disagree with the Companys assessment of its liability to its former methylene urea supplier; and the costs and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings. For a further discussion of risk factors, investors should refer to the Companys Securities and Exchange Commission reports, including but not limited to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk, principally interest rate risk. Market risk can be measured as the potential negative impact on earnings, cash flows or fair values resulting from a hypothetical change in interest rates over time. Interest paid on the Companys debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates. The interest rate for the Companys revolving credit facility is variable, while the interest component of its operating leases is generally fixed.
The Company believes its potential exposure to interest rate risk is not material to the Companys financial position or the results of its operations. As of March 31, 2005, there had not been a material change in any of the market risk information disclosed by the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. See Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk on page 35 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2005, for more detailed information regarding market risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Controls and Procedures
The Company performed an evaluation under the supervision, and with the participation, of the Companys management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that material information relating to the Company with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report was recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis.
24
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
During the first quarter, management did not identify any changes in the Companys internal controls in connection with its evaluation thereof that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Except as noted below, the items in Part II are inapplicable or, if applicable, would be answered in the negative. These items have been omitted and no other reference is made thereto.
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In 2003, an administrative complaint was filed against the Company by the State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) alleging violation of state law regarding the registration of pesticides. The complaint alleges that the Company distributed 3,400 bags of Dimension® Crabgrass Preemergent Plus Fertilizer to one of its retail customers in New York State without having proper registration thereof. The complaint seeks a civil penalty of $3,440,000. NYSDEC filed a similar complaint against the retail customer seeking a civil penalty of $3,440,000. The Company intends to indemnify the retail customer for such claim pursuant to a vendor agreement between the parties. The Company has held discussions with the NYSDEC relative to a settlement.
On November 29, 2004, the Company filed a declaratory judgment action, LESCO vs. KPAC Holdings, Inc., Case No. 1:04CV2573 pending in the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, to obtain a judicial determination of the amount of its liability arising from its termination of a five-year agreement with KPAC Holdings, Inc. (KPAC), our former methylene urea supplier (Supply Agreement). The Company had entered into the Supply Agreement in 2002 as part of an overall transaction by which the supplier purchased certain assets of the Company, including a plant used to produce methylene urea. The Supply Agreement required the Company to purchase, and the supplier to produce, minimum monthly quantities of certain products.
We filed the declaratory judgment action after the supplier refused the Companys offer to settle its liability for $2.2 million plus forgiveness of a $1.3 million note receivable due from the supplier, which the Company believed represented the extent of its potential liability under the Supply Agreement. The supplier asserted counterclaims against the Company seeking damages in excess of $7 million for breach of the Supply Agreement, breach of the asset purchase agreement and breach of an alleged agreement to settle the Companys liability on more favorable terms to the supplier. The suppliers two shareholders moved to intervene to assert a claim for breach of the same alleged settlement agreement. We continue to have settlement discussions with the supplier and its two shareholders and anticipate reaching a resolution agreement in the second quarter of 2005.
There are other legal actions, governmental investigations and proceedings pending to which the Company is a party or to which its property is subject. In the opinion of our management, after reviewing the information that is currently available with respect to these matters and consulting with counsel, any liability that may be ultimately incurred with respect to these matters is not expected to materially affect our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
25
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits
|
Exhibits 3(a) | Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (included as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference). | ||
Exhibit 3(b) | Amended Code of Regulations of the Registrant (included as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Exhibit 31(a) | Michael P. DiMino Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification | |||
Exhibit 31(b) | Jeffrey L. Rutherford Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification | |||
Exhibit 32(a) | Michael P. DiMino Section 1350 Certification | |||
Exhibit 32(b) | Jeffrey L. Rutherford Section 1350 Certification |
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
LESCO, INC. | ||
Date:
May 5, 2005
|
By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Rutherford | |
Jeffrey L. Rutherford | ||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, | ||
Treasurer and Secretary |
27