PARK OHIO INDUSTRIES INC/OH - 10-K Annual Report

Pursuant to a corporate reorganization effective June 15, 1998, Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp.

The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions I 1(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this form with reduced disclosure format.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No x

All of the outstanding stock of the registrant is held by Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. As of March 15, 2005, 100 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $1 par value, were outstanding.

Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (“Park-Ohio”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (“Holdings”), was incorporated as an Ohio corporation in 1984. Park-Ohio, primarily through its subsidiaries, is an industrial supply chain logistics and diversified manufacturing business operating in three segments: Integrated Logistics Solutions (“ILS”), Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products.

References herein to “we” or “the Company” include, where applicable, Holdings, Park-Ohio and its other direct and indirect subsidiaries.

ILS provides our customers with integrated supply chain management services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production components and has a leading market position in North America. Our Aluminum Products business manufactures cast and machined aluminum components, and our Manufactured Products business is a major manufacturer of highly-engineered industrial products. Our businesses serve large, industrial original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) in a variety of industrial sectors, including the automotive, heavy-duty truck, industrial equipment, steel, rail, electrical controls, aerospace and defense, lawn and garden and semiconductor industries. As of December 31, 2004, we employed approximately 3,200 persons.

The following table summarizes the key attributes of each of our business segments:


(1)	Results are for the year ended December 31, 2004 and exclude the results of operations related to the assets of the Amcast Components Group prior to the date of acquisition on August 23, 2004.

We have established leading market positions across a variety of industries, and we believe we maintain a #1 or #2 market position in products and services that represent more than 75% of our net sales. We benefit from long-term, entrenched relationships with high-quality customers that include leading OEMs, and we derive approximately 70% of our net sales from sole-source arrangements.

Our ILS business provides our customers with integrated supply chain management services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production components. Our ILS customers receive various value-added services, such as engineering and design services, part usage and cost analysis, supplier selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking, just-in-time and point-of-use delivery,

electronic billing services and ongoing technical support. We operate 32 logistics service centers in the United States, Mexico, Canada, Puerto Rico and Europe as well as production sourcing and support centers in Asia. Through our supply chain management programs, we supply more than 175,000 globally-sourced production components, many of which are specialized and customized to meet individual customers’ needs.

Products and Services. Supply chain management services, which is ILS’s primary focus for future growth, involves offering customers comprehensive, on-site management for most of their production component needs. Some production components are characterized by low per unit supplier prices relative to the indirect costs of supplier management, quality assurance, inventory management and delivery to the production line. In addition, ILS delivers an increasingly broad range of higher-cost production components including valves, fittings, steering components and many others. Applications-engineering specialists and the direct sales force work closely with the engineering staff of OEM customers to recommend the appropriate production components for a new product or to suggest alternative components that reduce overall production costs, streamline assembly or enhance the appearance or performance of the end product. As an additional service, ILS recently began providing spare parts and aftermarket products to end users of its customers’ products.

Supply chain management services are typically provided to customers pursuant to sole-source arrangements. We believe our services distinguish us from traditional buy/sell distributors, as well as manufacturers who supply products directly to customers, because we outsource our customers’ high-volume production components supply chain management, providing processes customized to each customer’s needs and replacing numerous current suppliers with a sole-source relationship. Our highly-developed, customized, information systems provide transparency and flexibility through the complete supply chain. This enables our customers to: (1) significantly reduce the direct and indirect cost of production component processes by outsourcing internal purchasing, quality assurance and inventory fulfillment responsibilities; (2) reduce the amount of working capital invested in inventory and floor space; (3) reduce component costs through purchasing efficiencies, including bulk buying and supplier consolidation; and (4) receive technical expertise in production component selection and design and engineering. Our sole-source arrangements foster long-term, entrenched supply relationships with our customers and, as a result, the average tenure of service for our top 50 ILS clients exceeds twelve years. ILS’s remaining non-manufacturing sales are generated through the wholesale supply of industrial products to other manufacturers and distributors pursuant to master or authorized distributor relationships.

ILS also engineers and manufactures precision cold formed and cold extruded products, including locknuts, SPAC® nuts and wheel hardware, that are principally used in applications where controlled tightening is required due to high vibration. ILS produces both standard items and specialty products to customer specifications that are used in large volumes by customers in the automotive, heavy-duty truck and rail industries.

Markets and Customers. For the year ended December 31, 2004, approximately 79% of ILS’s net sales were to domestic customers. Remaining sales were primarily to manufacturing facilities of large, multinational customers located in Canada, Mexico and Europe. Supply chain management services and production components are used extensively in a variety of industries, and demand is generally related to the state of the economy and to the overall level of manufacturing activity.

ILS markets and sells its services to over 6,500 customers domestically and internationally. The principal markets served by ILS are heavy-duty truck, electrical controls, automotive, other vehicle, industrial equipment, power sports equipment, lawn and garden and semiconductor industries. The five largest customers, within which ILS sells through sole-source contracts to multiple operating divisions or locations, accounted for approximately 32% and 38% of sales of ILS for 2003 and 2004, respectively, with International Truck representing 15% and 19%, respectively, of segment sales. Two of the five largest customers are in the heavy-duty truck industry. The loss of the International Truck account or any two of the remaining top five customers could have a material adverse effect on this segment.

Competition. There are a limited number of companies who compete with ILS for supply chain service contracts. ILS competes mainly with domestic competitors primarily on the basis of its value-added services, which includes sourcing, engineering and delivery capabilities, geographic reach, extensive product selection, price and reputation for high service levels.

We believe that we are one of the few part suppliers that has the capability to provide a wide range of high-volume, high-quality products utilizing a broad range of processes, including permanent mold, low-pressure, die-cast, sand-cast and lost-foam, as well as a proprietary sub-liquidous process. Our ability to offer our customers this comprehensive range of capabilities at a low cost provides us with a competitive advantage. We produce our aluminum components at six manufacturing facilities in Ohio, Indiana and Wisconsin.

Products and Services. Our Aluminum Products business casts and machines aluminum engine, transmission, brake, suspension and other components for automotive, agricultural equipment, heavy-duty truck and construction equipment OEMs, primarily on a sole-source basis. Aluminum Products’ principal products include transmission pump housings, intake manifolds, planetary pinion carriers, oil filter adapters, clutch retainers, bearing cups, brackets, oil pans and flywheel spacers. In addition, we also provide value-added services such as design engineering, machining and part assembly. Although these parts are lightweight, they possess high durability and integrity characteristics even under extreme pressure and temperature conditions.

Demand by automotive OEMs for aluminum castings has increased in recent years as they have sought lighter alternatives to steel and iron, primarily to increase fuel efficiency without compromising structural integrity. We believe that this replacement trend will continue as end-users and the regulatory environment require greater fuel efficiency. To capitalize on this trend, in August 2004, we acquired substantially all of the assets of the Amcast Components Group, a producer of aluminum automotive components. This acquisition significantly increased our production capacity and added attractive new customers, product lines and production technologies. We believe that the acquisition of the Amcast Components Group will significantly increase the net sales of our Aluminum Products business. The historical financial data contained throughout this annual report on Form 10-K exclude the results of operations of the Amcast Components Group other than for the period from August 23, 2004 through December 31, 2004.

Markets and Customers. The five largest customers, of which Aluminum Products sells to multiple operating divisions through sole-source contracts, accounted for approximately 79% of Aluminum Products sales for both 2003 and 2004, respectively. The loss of any one of these customers could have a material adverse effect on this segment.

Competition. The domestic aluminum castings industry is highly competitive. Aluminum Products competes principally on the basis of its ability to: (1) engineer and manufacture high-quality, cost-effective, machined castings utilizing multiple casting technologies in large volumes; (2) provide timely delivery; and (3) retain the manufacturing flexibility necessary to quickly adjust to the needs of its customers. Although there are a number of smaller domestic companies with aluminum casting capabilities, the customers’ stringent quality and service standards enable only large suppliers with the requisite quality certifications to compete effectively. As one of these suppliers, Aluminum Products is well-positioned to benefit as customers continue to consolidate their supplier base.

Our Manufactured Products segment operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of highly-engineered products, including induction heating and melting systems, pipe threading systems, rubber products and forged and machined products. We manufacture these products in eleven domestic facilities and eight international facilities in Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, China and Japan.

Products and Services. Our induction heating and melting business utilizes proprietary technology and specializes in the engineering, construction, service and repair of induction heating and melting systems, primarily for the steel, coatings, forging, foundry, automotive and construction equipment industries. Our induction heating and melting systems are engineered and built to customer specifications and are used primarily for melting, heating, and surface hardening of metals and curing of coatings. Approximately 35%-40% of our induction heating and melting systems’ revenues is derived from the sale of replacement parts and provision of field service, primarily for the installed base of our own products. We also produce and provide services and spare parts for other capital equipment such as pipe threading equipment for the oil and gas industry, oven systems and mechanical forging presses,

as well as manufacture injection molded rubber and silicone products for use in automotive and industrial applications. Our forged and machined products include locomotive crankshafts, aircraft structural components such as landing gears and rail products such as railcar center plates. We also engineer and install mechanical forging presses for the automotive and truck manufacturing industries and sell spare parts and provide field service for the large existing base of mechanical forging presses and hammers in North America.

We manufacture injection molded rubber and silicone products for use in automotive and industrial applications. The rubber products facilities manufacture products for customers in the automotive, food processing and consumer appliance industries. Their products include wire harnesses, shock and vibration mounts, spark plug boots and nipples and general sealing gaskets. During 2002, we reduced rubber products’ costs and discontinued underperforming products by selling one business unit and closing a manufacturing plant.

Markets and Customers. In our Manufactured Products’ capital equipment business, approximately 38% of net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 was derived from replacement parts and the provision of field service. In addition, we manufacture forged and machined products produced from closed-die metal forgings of up to 6,000 pounds. Aerospace forgings are sold primarily to machining companies and sub-assemblers who finish the products for sale to OEMs. We also machine, induction harden and surface finish crankshafts and camshafts used primarily in locomotives. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we decided to shut down our locomotive crankshaft forging plant and entered into a long-term supply contract to purchase locomotive crankshaft forgings at a more favorable price from a third-party supplier. Forged rail products are sold primarily to railcar builders and maintenance providers. Forged and machined products are sold to a wide variety of domestic and international OEMs and other manufacturers, primarily in the transportation industries.

Competition. Our capital equipment units compete with small to medium-sized domestic and international equipment manufacturers on the basis of service capability, ability to meet customer specifications, delivery performance and engineering expertise. Our rubber products operating units compete primarily on the basis of price and product quality with other domestic small- to medium-sized manufacturers of injection molded rubber and silicone products. Our forged and machined products business competes domestically and internationally with other small- to medium-sized businesses on the basis of product quality and precision.

ILS markets its products and services in the United States, Mexico, Canada and Europe, primarily through its direct sales force, which is assisted by applications engineers who provide the technical expertise necessary to assist the engineering staff of OEM customers in designing new products and improving existing products. Aluminum Products primarily markets and sells its products in North America through internal sales personnel. Manufactured Products primarily markets and sells its products in North America through both internal sales personnel and independent sales representatives. Induction heating and pipe threading equipment is also marketed and sold in Europe, Asia, Latin America and northern Africa through both internal sales personnel and independent sales representatives. In some instances, the internal engineering staff assists in the sales and marketing effort through joint design and applications-engineering efforts with major customers.

ILS purchases substantially all of its production components from third-party suppliers. Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products purchase substantially all of their raw materials, principally metals and certain component parts incorporated into their products, from third-party suppliers and manufacturers. Management believes that raw materials and component parts other than certain specialty products are available from alternative sources. ILS has multiple sources of supply for its products. An increasing portion of ILS’s delivered components are purchased from suppliers in foreign countries, primarily Taiwan, China, South Korea, India and Eastern Europe. We are dependent upon the ability of such suppliers to meet stringent quality and performance standards and to conform to delivery schedules. Most raw materials required by Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products are commodity products available from several domestic suppliers.

We have thousands of customers who demand quality, delivery and service. Numerous customers have recognized our performance by awarding us with supplier quality awards. No customer accounted for more than 10% of consolidated sales in any of the past three years, except for International Truck in 2004 and 2003.

Management believes that backlog is not a meaningful measure for ILS, as a majority of ILS’s customers require just-in-time delivery of production components. Management believes that Aluminum Products’ and Manufactured Products’ backlog as of any particular date is not a meaningful measure of sales for any future period as a significant portion of sales are on a release or firm order basis.

We are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations designed to protect public health and the environment, particularly with regard to discharges and emissions, as well as handling, storage, treatment and disposal, of various substances and wastes. Our failure to comply with applicable environmental laws and regulations and permit requirements could result in civil and criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions, including regulatory or judicial orders enjoining or curtailing operations or requiring corrective measures. Pursuant to certain environmental laws, owners or operators of facilities may be liable for the costs of response or other corrective actions for contamination identified at or emanating from current or former locations, without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of any such contamination, and for related damages to natural resources. Additionally, persons who arrange for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances or materials may be liable for costs of response at sites where they are located, whether or not the site is owned or operated by such person.

From time to time, we have incurred and are presently incurring costs and obligations for correcting environmental noncompliance and remediating environmental conditions at certain of our properties. In general, we have not experienced difficulty in complying with environmental laws in the past, and compliance with environmental laws has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Our capital expenditures on environmental control facilities were not material during the past five years and such expenditures are not expected to be material to us in the foreseeable future.

We are currently, and may in the future, be required to incur costs relating to the investigation or remediation of property, including property where we have disposed of our waste, and for addressing environmental conditions. For instance, we have been identified as a potentially responsible party at third-party sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, or comparable state laws, which provide for strict and, under certain circumstances, joint and several liability. We are participating in the cost of certain clean-up efforts at several of these sites. The availability of third-party payments or insurance for environmental remediation activities is subject to risks associated with the willingness and ability of the third party to make payments. However, our share of such costs has not been material and, based on available information, we do not expect our exposure at any of these locations to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

The information contained under the heading of “Note L—Industry Segments” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein, relating to (i) net sales, income (loss) before income taxes and change in accounting principles, identifiable assets and other information by industry segment and (ii) net sales and assets by geographic region for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 is incorporated herein by reference.

The information contained under the heading of “Note D—Acquisitions” of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included herein, is incorporated by reference.

As of December 31, 2004, our operations included numerous manufacturing and supply chain logistics services facilities located in 23 states in the United States, and in Puerto Rico, as well as in Asia, Canada, Europe and Mexico. Approximately 90% of the available square footage was located in the United States. Approximately 49% of the available square footage was owned. In 2004, approximately 35% of the available domestic square footage was used by the ILS segment, 38% was used by the Manufactured Products segment and 27% by the Aluminum Products segment. Approximately 27% of the available foreign square footage was used by the ILS segment and 73% was used by the Manufactured Products segment. In the opinion of management, our facilities are generally well maintained and are suitable and adequate for their intended uses.

The following table provides information relative to our principal facilities as of December 31, 2004.


(1)	ILS has 31 other facilities, none of which is deemed to be a principal facility.

(2)	Includes 10,000 square feet used by Park-Ohio Corporate Office.

(3)	Includes three leased properties with square footage of 82,300, 64,000 and 45,700 and one owned property of 91,800 square feet.

(4)	Manufactured Products has 18 other owned and leased facilities, none of which is deemed to be a principal facility.

We are subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are asserted in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation involves an element of uncertainty,

in the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from currently pending or threatened litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. We have been named as one of many defendants in a number of asbestos-related personal injury lawsuits. Most of the cases that have been dismissed were because of a failure to identify an asbestos containing product manufactured by us or a predecessor. Our cost of defending such lawsuits has not been material to date and based upon available information, our management does not expect our future costs for asbestos-related lawsuits to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity of financial condition.

Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

The registrant is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. and has no equity securities that trade.

Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The historical financial information is not directly comparable on a year-to-year basis, primarily due to debt extinguishment costs and writeoff of deferred financing costs associated with the tender and early redemption during 2004 of our 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007, restructuring and unusual charges in 2002 and 2003, a goodwill impairment charge in 2002 to reflect the cumulative effect of an accounting change, and acquisitions and divestitures during the three years ended December 31, 2004.

We are an industrial supply chain logistics and diversified manufacturing business, operating in three segments: ILS, Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products. ILS provides customers with integrated supply chain management services for a broad range of high-volume, specialty production components. ILS customers receive various value-added services, such as engineering and design services, part usage and cost analysis, supplier selection, quality assurance, bar coding, product packaging and tracking, just-in-time and point-of use delivery, electronic billing and ongoing technical support. The principal customers of ILS are in the heavy-duty truck, electrical controls, automotive and other vehicle, industrial equipment, power sports equipment, lawn and garden equipment, and semiconductor equipment industries. Aluminum Products casts and machines aluminum engine, transmission, brake, suspension and other components for automotive, agricultural equipment, construction equipment and heavy-duty truck OEMs, primarily on a sole-source basis. Aluminum Products also provides value-added services such as design and engineering and assembly. Manufactured Products operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of highly-engineered products including induction heating and melting systems, pipe threading systems, industrial oven systems, rubber products, and forged and machined products. Manufactured Products also produces and provides services and spare parts for the equipment it manufactures. The principal customers of Manufactured Products are OEMs and end-users in the steel, automotive, oil and gas, rail, and aerospace and defense industries. Sales, earnings and other relevant financial data for these three segments are provided in Note L to the consolidated financial statements.

During 2004, we experienced the increased sales and profitability previously forecast, as the manufacturing economy returned to growth, particularly in three of our customer industries: heavy-duty truck; semiconductor equipment; and equipment for steel manufacturing. Net sales increased 30% compared to 2003. Profitability increased more than proportionally to sales, based on cost reductions from our restructuring during the downturn in 2001, 2002 and 2003. During those years, we consolidated 28 supply chain logistics facilities, and closed or sold 11 manufacturing plants.

During 2004, we reinforced our long-term availability and attractive pricing of funds by refinancing both of our major sources of borrowed funds: senior subordinated notes and our revolving credit agreement. In November 2004, we sold $210.0 million of 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014. We used the net proceeds to fund the tender and early redemption of $199.9 million of our 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007. We incurred debt extinguishment costs primarily related to premiums and other transaction costs associated with the tender and early redemption and wrote off deferred financing costs totaling $6.0 million associated with the repurchased senior subordinated notes.

In December 2004, we amended our revolving credit agreement, extending its maturity to six years so that it now expires in December 2010, increasing the credit limit so that we may borrow up to $200.0 million subject to an asset based formula, and providing lower interest rate levels. Borrowings under the credit agreement are secured by substantially all our assets. We had approximately $53.9 million of unused borrowing availability at December 31, 2004. Funds provided by operations plus available borrowings under the revolving credit agreement are expected to be adequate to meet our cash requirements.

We acquired substantially all of the assets of the Amcast Components Group on August 23, 2004 for $10.0 million cash and the assumption of approximately $9.0 million of operating liabilities. We sold substantially all the assets of St. Louis Screw and Green Bearing in first quarter 2003, for cash totaling approximately $7.3 million, and Castle Rubber Company in second quarter 2002, for cash of approximately $2.5 million. We purchased substantially all the assets of Ajax Magnethermic Corp. in third quarter 2002, for cash of approximately $5.5 million.

On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“FAS 142”). Under FAS 142, we reviewed goodwill and other intangible assets and recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $48.8 million, which was recorded as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle effective January 1, 2002. Circumstances which led to this goodwill impairment included reduced sales, profitability and growth rates of the units with goodwill (see Note C to the consolidated financial statements), and reduced transaction prices for comparable businesses, which were themselves results of the downturn in the economy. The effects of these circumstances on our operations, financial condition and liquidity are reflected in 2002 and 2003 results. The goodwill impairment itself did not have any effect on operations. Under FAS 142, goodwill was not amortized, starting in 2002.

In accordance with FAS 142, goodwill is now reviewed annually for potential impairment. This review was performed as of October 1, 2004, 2003 and 2002, using forecasted discounted cash flows, and it was determined that no further impairment is required.

At December 31, 2004, the balance sheet reflected $82.6 million of goodwill in the ILS and Aluminum Products segments. In 2004, discount rates used ranged from 10.25% to 12.25%, and long-term revenue growth rates used ranged from 3.5% to 4.0%.

In 2003, we changed our method of accounting for the 15% of inventories utilizing the LIFO method to the FIFO method. As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the Company restated its balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 and increased inventories by the recorded LIFO reserve ($4.4 million), increased deferred tax liabilities ($1.7 million), and increased shareholders’ equity ($2.7 million). Previously reported results of operations were not restated because the impact of utilizing the LIFO method had an insignificant impact on the Company’s reported amounts for consolidated net income (loss). See also Note B to the consolidated financial statements.

Net sales increased by 30% in 2004, compared to 2003. ILS sales increased due to general economic growth, in particular due to significant growth in the heavy-duty truck and semiconductor industries, the addition of new customers, and increases in product range to existing customers. ILS growth was partially offset by a $1.0 million sales decrease related to the 2003 sale of Green Bearing. Aluminum

Products 2004 sales increased $30.4 million due to the Amcast Components Group acquisition in August 2004, with additional growth from new contracts and increased volumes in the existing business. Manufactured Products sales increased primarily in the induction equipment, pipe threading equipment and forging businesses. Of this increase, $15.9 million was due to the second quarter 2004 acquisition of the remaining 66% of the common stock of Jamco, partially offset by the divestiture of St. Louis Screw in the first quarter of 2003.

Cost of products sold increased 29% in 2004 compared to 2003, while gross margin increased to 15.6% from 15.5% in 2003. ILS gross margin decreased modestly, primarily due to steel price increases and mix changes, and the negative impact of $1.1 million resulting from the bankruptcy of a significant customer, Murray, Inc. Aluminum Products gross margin decreased due to a combination of the addition of lower-margin Amcast business, product mix and pricing changes, and specific one-time costs incurred in 2004 for product startup, scrap and reserves. The $30.4 million of sales from the acquired Amcast business generated significantly lower margins than the existing Aluminum Products business. We expect margins at the acquired plants to increase over time, as a result of post-acquisition cost reductions, price increases and new business. Gross margin in the Manufactured Products segment increased, primarily as a result of increased sales and overhead efficiencies achieved in the induction equipment, pipe threading equipment and forging businesses. Gross margins in both the Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products segments were negatively impacted by rising natural gas costs.

Consolidated SG&A expenses increased by 23% in 2004 compared to 2003. Approximately $5.5 million of the SG&A increase was due to acquisitions, primarily Jamco and Amcast Components Group, and compliance costs associated with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, while the remainder was primarily due to increased sales and production volumes. Despite this increase, SG&A expenses as a percent of sales decreased by 50 basis points due both to cost reductions from restructuring and to the absorption of these expenses over increased sales. SG&A expenses were reduced in 2004 compared to 2003 by a $2.3 million increase in net pension credits reflecting improved returns on pension plan assets.

Interest expense increased in 2004 compared to 2003, primarily due to the fourth quarter 2004 debt extinguishment costs. These costs primarily related to premiums and other transaction costs associated with the tender and early redemption and writeoff of deferred financing costs associated with the 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes. Excluding these costs, interest decreased due to lower average interest rates in 2004, partially offset by higher average outstanding borrowings. The lower average

borrowing rate in 2004 was due primarily to decreased rates on our revolving credit agreement. The increase in average borrowings in 2004 resulted primarily from higher working capital requirements.

The effective income tax rate for 2004 was 19%. Primarily foreign and certain state income taxes were provided for in both years, because federal income taxes were not owed due to the recognition of net operating loss carryforwards for which valuation allowances had been provided. At December 31, 2004, our subsidiaries had $47.7 million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes. We have not recognized any tax benefit for these loss carryforwards. In accordance with the provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (“FAS 109”), “Accounting for Income Taxes,” we recorded no tax benefit for the 2003 net loss because we had incurred three years of cumulative losses. Income taxes of $.9 million were provided in 2003, primarily for state and foreign taxes on profitable operations.

Net sales declined by 2% in 2003. $10.4 million of the ILS sales decline related to the sale of Green Bearing and the termination of a high-margin pharmaceutical sales contract, while the remainder reflected general economic weakness. Aluminum Products net sales were lower primarily due to the ending of $10.0 million of sales contracts, the majority of which relate to the closure of the Tupelo and Hudson plants. Manufactured Products net sales increased $26.4 million primarily in the induction business. The acquisition of Ajax Magnethermic increased 2003 net sales by $29.6 million and the divestiture of Castle Rubber and St. Louis Screw decreased 2003 net sales by $6.8 million.

Cost of products sold declined 4% in 2003, and gross profit increased 10%, while gross margin increased to 15.5% in 2003, from 13.8% in 2002. ILS gross margin decreased primarily due to reduced absorption of fixed overhead over a smaller sales base and the positive effect on 2002 of the early termination of a high-margin pharmaceutical sales contract, partially offset by lower inventory costs, facility costs and other cost reductions. Aluminum Products gross margin increased significantly, primarily as a result of restructuring and cost reductions and higher margins on new contracts. Gross margin in the Manufactured Products segment increased, primarily as a result of increased sales and overhead efficiencies achieved in the induction business.

Consolidated SG&A expenses increased by 8% in 2003, while SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 10.0% for 2003 compared to 9.1% for 2002. This increase was due primarily to the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures and the $2.6 million reduction of net pension credits reflecting less favorable returns on pension plan assets, partially offset by reductions in other SG&A costs in all three segments.

Interest expense decreased by 5% due to lower average debt outstanding and lower average interest rates during 2003. The decrease in average borrowings resulted primarily from the sale of two manufacturing units and lower working capital requirements. The lower average borrowing rate in 2003 was due primarily to decreased rates on the Company’s new revolving credit agreement, beginning in August 2003.

In accordance with the provision of FAS 109, the Company recorded no tax benefit for the 2003 or 2002 net losses, because in both years it had incurred three years of cumulative losses. Income taxes of $.9 million were provided in 2003 and 2002, primarily for state and foreign taxes on profitable operations. At December 31, 2003, subsidiaries of the Company had $35.7 million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal tax purposes. The Company has not recognized any tax benefit for these loss carryforwards.

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions which affect amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Management has made their best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. We do not believe that there is great likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions related to the accounting policies described below. However, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition: We recognize more than 93% of our revenue when title is transferred to unaffiliated customers, typically upon shipment. Our remaining revenue, from long-term contracts, is recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting. Selling prices are fixed based on purchase orders or contractual arrangements. Our revenue recognition policies are in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition.”

Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable have been reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. Allowances are developed by the individual operating units based on historical losses, adjusting for economic conditions. Our policy is to identify and reserve for specific collectibility concerns based on customers’ financial condition and payment history. The establishment of reserves requires the use of judgment and assumptions regarding

Allowance for Obsolete and Slow Moving Inventory: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value and have been reduced by an allowance for obsolete and slow-moving inventories. The estimated allowance is based on management’s review of inventories on hand with minimal sales activity, which is compared to estimated future usage and sales. Inventories identified by management as slow-moving or obsolete are reserved for based on estimated selling prices less disposal costs. Though we consider these allowances adequate and proper, changes in economic conditions in specific markets in which we operate could have a material effect on reserve allowances required.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: Long-lived assets are reviewed by management for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount may not be recoverable. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company decided to exit certain under-performing product lines and to close or consolidate certain operating facilities and, accordingly, recorded restructuring and impairment charges as discussed above and in Note N to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

Restructuring: We recognize costs in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs incurred in a Restructuring)” (“EITF 94-3”), and SAB No. 100, “Restructuring and Impairment Charges” for charges prior to 2003. Detailed contemporaneous documentation is maintained and updated on a quarterly basis to ensure that accruals are properly supported. If management determines that there is a change in the estimate, the accruals are adjusted to reflect the changes.

In 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (“FAS 146”), which nullified EITF 94-3 and requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at the fair value only when the liability is incurred. FAS 146 has no effect on charges recorded for exit activities begun prior to 2002.

Goodwill: We adopted FAS 142 as of January 1, 2002. Under FAS 142, we are required to review goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.

We completed the transitional impairment review of goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2002 and recorded a non-cash charge of $48.8 million. The charge has been reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. We have also completed the annual impairment test as of October 1, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and have determined that no additional goodwill impairment existed as of those dates.

Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities: We account for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates. In determining these amounts, management determined the probability of realizing deferred tax assets, taking into consideration factors including historical operating results, expectations of future earnings and taxable income and the extended period of time over which the postretirement benefits will be paid.

At December 31, 2004, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of approximately $47.7 million, which will expire between 2021 and 2024. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 109, the tax benefits related to these carryforwards have been fully reserved as of December 31, 2004 because the Company is in a three-year cumulative loss position.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans: We and our subsidiaries have pension plans, principally noncontributory defined benefit or noncontributory defined contribution plans and postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all employees. The measurement of liabilities related to these plans is based on management’s assumptions related to future events, including interest rates, return on pension plan assets, rate of compensation increases and health care cost trends. Pension plan asset performance in the future will directly impact our net income. We have evaluated our pension and other postretirement benefit assumptions, considering current trends in interest rates and market conditions and believe our assumptions are appropriate.

Our results of operations are typically stronger in the first six months than the last six months of each calendar year due to scheduled plant maintenance in the third quarter to coincide with customer plant shutdowns and due to holidays in the fourth quarter.

The timing of orders placed by our customers has varied with, among other factors, orders for customers’ finished goods, customer production schedules, competitive conditions and general economic conditions. The variability of the level and timing of orders has, from time to time, resulted in significant periodic and quarterly fluctuations in the operations of our business units. Such variability is particularly evident at the capital equipment businesses, included in the Manufactured Products segment, which typically ship a few large systems per year.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. The words “believes”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends”, “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance and achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. These uncertainties and other factors include such things as: general business conditions and competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product innovation; demand for our products and services; raw material availability and pricing; changes in our relationships with customers and suppliers; the financial condition of our customers, including the impact of any bankruptcies; our ability to successfully integrate recent and future acquisitions into existing operations; changes in general domestic economic conditions such as inflation rates, interest rates, tax rates and adverse impacts to us, our suppliers and customers from acts of terrorism or hostilities; our ability to meet various covenants, including financial covenants, contained in our revolving credit agreement and the indenture governing the Senior Subordinated Notes; increasingly stringent domestic and foreign governmental regulations, including those affecting the environment; inherent uncertainties involved in assessing our potential liability for environmental remediation-related activities; the outcome of pending and future litigation and other claims; dependence on the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries, which are highly cyclical; dependence on key management; and dependence on information systems. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a forward-looking statement herein should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved.

We are exposed to market risk including changes in interest rates. We are subject to interest rate risk on our floating rate revolving credit facility, which consisted of borrowings of $120.6 million at December 31, 2004. A 100 basis point increase in the interest rate would have resulted in an increase in interest expense of approximately $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Our foreign subsidiaries generally conduct business in local currencies. During 2004, we recorded a favorable foreign currency translation adjustment of $2.1 million related to net assets located outside the United States. This foreign currency translation adjustment resulted primarily from the weakening of the United States dollar in relation to the Canadian dollar, British pound and euro. Our foreign operations are also subject to other customary risks of operating in a global environment, such as unstable political situations, the effect of local laws and taxes, tariff increases and regulations and requirements for export licenses, the potential imposition of trade or foreign exchange restrictions and transportation delays.

Our largest exposures to commodity prices relate to steel and natural gas price increases, which have increased significantly in 2004. We do not have any commodity swap agreements or hedge contracts for future increases in steel or natural gas prices.

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the last fiscal year. The framework on which such evaluation was based is contained in the report entitled “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Report”). Based upon the evaluation described above under the framework contained in the COSO Report, the Company’s management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004. Management has identified no material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.

Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. This attestation report is included at page 17 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 and our report dated March 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholder’s equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note B to the consolidated financial statements, effective June 30, 2003, the Company changed its method of accounting for inventories at certain subsidiaries. As discussed in Note C to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Accounting Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market value (See Note B). Inventory reserves were $18,500 and $18,817 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. Major additions and associated interest costs are capitalized and betterments are charged to accumulated depreciation; expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to operations. Depreciation of fixed assets is computed principally by the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 25-60 years for buildings, and 3-16 years for machinery and equipment. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in business conditions indicate that their full carrying value may not be recoverable (See Note N).

Goodwill: As discussed in Note C, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“FAS 142”), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” as of January 1, 2002. Under FAS 142, goodwill is no longer amortized but is subject to impairment testing at least annually on October 1. Prior to 2002, goodwill was amortized primarily over 40 years using the straight-line method.

Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits: The Company and its subsidiaries have pension plans, principally noncontributory defined benefit or noncontributory defined contribution plans, covering substantially all employees. In addition, the Company has two unfunded postretirement benefit plans. For the defined benefit plans, benefits are based on the employee’s years of service and the Company’s policy is to fund that amount recommended by its independent actuaries. For the defined contribution plans, the costs charged to operations and the amount funded are based upon a percentage of the covered employees’ compensation.

Income Taxes: The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method, whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the current enacted tax rates. In determining these amounts, management determined the probability of realizing deferred tax

assets, taking into consideration factors including historical operating results, expectations of future earnings and taxable income and the extended period of time over which the postretirement benefits will be paid and accordingly records valuation allowances when necessary (See Note H).

Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue, other than from long-term contracts, when title is transferred to the customer, typically upon shipment. Revenue from long-term contracts (less than 7% of consolidated revenue) is accounted for under the percentage of completion method, and recognized on the basis of the percentage each contract’s cost to date bears to the total estimated contract cost. Revenue earned on contracts in process in excess of billings is classified in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 101, “Revenue Recognition.”

Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable are recorded at selling price which is fixed based on a purchase order or contractual arrangement. Accounts receivable are reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. The Company’s policy is to identify and reserve for specific collectibility concerns based on customers’ financial condition and payment history.

Concentration of Credit Risk: The Company sells its products to customers in diversified industries. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition but does not require collateral to support customer receivables. The Company establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information. Write-offs of accounts receivable have historically been low. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had uncollateralized receivables with six customers in the automotive and heavy-duty truck industries, each with several locations, aggregating $44,522, which represented approximately 31% of the Company’s trade accounts receivable. During 2004, sales to these customers amounted to approximately $240,787, which represented approximately 30% of the Company’s net sales.

Shipping and Handling Costs: All shipping and handling costs are included in cost of products sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Environmental: The Company accrues environmental costs related to existing conditions resulting from past or current operations and from which no current or future benefit is discernible. Costs that extend the life of the related property or mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination are capitalized. The Company records a liability when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The estimated liability of the Company is not discounted or reduced for possible recoveries from insurance carriers.

Foreign Currency Translation: The functional currency for all subsidiaries outside the United States is the local currency. Financial statements for these subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at year-end exchange rates as to assets and liabilities and weighted-average exchange rates as to revenues and expenses. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in shareholders’ equity.

Impact of Other Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” relating to consolidation of certain entities. First, FIN 46 will require identification of the Company’s participation in variable interest entities (“VIEs”), which are defined as entities with a level of invested equity that is not sufficient to fund future activities to permit them to operate on a stand alone basis, or whose equity holders lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Then, for entities identified as VIEs, FIN 46 sets forth a model to evaluate potential consolidation based on an assessment of which party to the VIE, if any, bears a majority of the exposure to its expected losses, or stands to gain from a majority of its expected returns. FIN 46 also sets forth certain disclosures regarding

interests in VIEs that are deemed significant, even if consolidation is not required. The Company’s adoption of FIN 46 had no effect on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“FAS 149”). FAS 149 amends and clarifies the accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under FAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” FAS 149 is generally effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The Company’s adoption of FAS 149 had no effect on its financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (“FAS 150”). FAS 150 requires that certain financial instruments, which under previous guidance were accounted for as equity, must now be accounted for as liabilities. The financial instruments affected include mandatorily redeemable stock, certain financial instruments that require or may require the issuer to buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets and certain obligations that can be settled with shares of stock. FAS 150 is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and must be applied to the Company’s existing financial instruments effective July 1, 2003, the beginning of the first fiscal period after June 15, 2003. The Company adopted FAS 150 on June 1, 2003. The adoption of this statement had no effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Medicare Act”) was enacted in the United States. The Medicare Act, among other things, expanded existing Medicare healthcare benefits to include an outpatient prescription drug benefit to Medicare eligible residents of the U.S. (“Part D”) beginning in 2006. Prescription drug coverage will be available to eligible individuals who voluntarily enroll under a Part D plan. As an alternative, employers may provide drug coverage at least “actuarially equivalent to standard coverage” and receive a tax-free federal subsidy equal to 28% of a portion of a Medicare beneficiary’s drug costs. However, if covered retirees enroll in a Part D plan, the employer would not receive the subsidy.

The FASB has issued Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003,” to provide guidance on accounting for effects of this healthcare benefit legislation. The FSP treats the effect of the employer subsidy on the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (“APBO”) as an actuarial gain. The effect of the subsidy would also be reflected in the estimate of service cost in measuring the cost of benefits attributable to current service. The effects of plan amendments adopted subsequent to the adoption of the Medicare Act to qualify plans as actuarially equivalent would be treated as actuarial gains if the net effect of the amendments reduces the APBO. The net effect on the APBO of any plan amendments that (a) reduce benefits under the plan and thus disqualify the benefits as actuarially equivalent and (b) eliminate the subsidy would be accounted for as prior service cost.

The Company has completed its assessment of the provisions of the Medicare Act on its postretirement healthcare plans. The effect of the Medicare Act is a reduction to the APBO of $2,350. The effect of the Medicare Act reduced the net periodic postretirement benefit cost by $310 in 2004.

In the fourth quarter of 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, “Inventory Costs” (“FAS 151”), an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4. The amendments made by FAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) are to be recognized as current-period charges and will require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity

of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. The Company expects the adoption of FAS 151 to have little impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Jobs Act”) was signed into law in October 2004. The Jobs Act provides, among other things, for a tax deduction on qualified domestic production activities and introduced a special one-time dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer, provided certain criteria are met. The FASB issued FASB Staff Position 109-1 to provide guidance on the application of FAS 109, and FASB Staff Position 109-2 to provide accounting and disclosure guidance for the repatriation provision. The Company is reviewing the implication of the Jobs Act, recently released treasury guidance, and the FASB staff positions and does not expect the Jobs Act will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Reclassification: Certain amounts in the prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Effective June 30, 2003, the Company changed the method of accounting for the 15% of its inventories utilizing the LIFO method to the FIFO method. The Company believes that this change is preferable for the following reasons: 1) the change conforms all of its inventories to one method of determining cost, which is the FIFO method; 2) the costs of the Company’s inventories have remained fairly level during the past several years, which has substantially negated the benefits of the LIFO method (a better matching of current costs with current revenue in periods of rising costs); 3) the impact of utilizing the LIFO method has had an insignificant impact on the Company’s consolidated net income (loss) during the past several years; and 4) the FIFO method results in the valuation of inventories at current costs on the consolidated balance sheet, which provides a more meaningful presentation for investors and financial institutions.

As required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the Company has restated the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 to increase inventories by the recorded LIFO reserve $4,400, increase deferred tax liabilities ($1,700), and increase shareholders’ equity $2,700. Previously reported results of operations have not been restated because the impact of utilizing the LIFO method had an insignificant impact on the Company’s reported amounts for consolidated net income (loss).

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted FAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Under this standard, goodwill is no longer amortized, but is subject to an impairment test at least annually. The Company has selected October 1 as its annual testing date. In the year of adoption, FAS 142 also requires the Company to perform a transitional test to determine whether goodwill was impaired as of the beginning of the year. Under FAS 142, the initial step in testing for goodwill impairment is to compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its book value. To the extent the fair value of any reporting unit is less than its book value, which would indicate that potential impairment of goodwill exists, a second test is required to determine the amount of impairment.

The Company, with assistance of an outside consultant, completed the transitional impairment review of goodwill using a discounted cash flow approach to determine the fair value of each reporting unit. Based upon the results of these calculations, the Company recorded a non-cash charge for

goodwill impairment which aggregated $48,799. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 142, the charge has been accounted for as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, effective January 1, 2002. The Company also completed the annual impairment tests as of October 1, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and has determined that no additional impairment of goodwill existed as of those dates.

The following table summarizes the transitional goodwill impairment charge by reporting segment as well as the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004.

The increase in the goodwill in the ILS segment during 2003 and 2004 results from foreign currency fluctuations.

On August 23, 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of the Automotive Components Group (“Amcast Components Group”) of Amcast Industrial Corporation. The purchase price was approximately $10,000 in cash and the assumption of approximately $9,000 of operating liabilities. The acquisition was funded with borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility. The purchase price and the results of operations of Amcast Components Group prior to its date of acquisition were not deemed significant as defined in Regulation S-X. The results of operations for Amcast Components Group have been included since August 23, 2004.

The tentative allocation of the purchase price has been performed based on the assignment of fair values to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Final fair values will be based primarily on appraisals from an independent appraisal firm.

The Company has a plan for integration activities and plant rationalization. In accordance with FASB EITF Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combina-

tion”, the Company recorded accruals for severance, exit and relocation costs in the purchase price allocation. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending accrual balances is as follows:

On April 1, 2004, the Company acquired the remaining 66% of the common stock of Japan Ajax Magnethermic Company (“Jamco”) for cash existing on the balance sheet of Jamco at that date. No additional purchase price was paid by the Company. The purchase price and the results of operations of Jamco prior to its date of acquisition were not deemed significant as defined in Regulation S-X.

Substantially all advance billings and warranty, project and installation accruals relate to the Company’s capital equipment businesses.

The changes in the aggregate product warranty liability are as follows for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

The acquired warranty liability during 2004 reflects the warranty liability of Jamco, which was acquired in April 2004.

Maturities of long-term debt during each of the five years following December 31, 2004 are approximately $2,931 in 2005, $821 in 2006, $836 in 2007, $674 in 2008 and $689 in 2009.

In November 2004, the Company issued $210,000 of 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due November 15, 2014 (“8.375% Notes”). The net proceeds from this debt issuance were approximately $205,178 net of underwriting and other debt offering fees. Proceeds from the 8.375% Notes were used to fund the tender and early redemption of the Company’s 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007. The Company incurred debt extinguishment costs related primarily to premiums and other transaction costs associated with the tender and early redemption and wrote off deferred financing costs associated with the 9.25% Senior Subordinated Notes totaling $5,963 or $.53 per share on a diluted basis.

The Company is a party to a credit and security agreement dated November 5, 2003, as amended (“Credit Agreement”), with a group of banks, under which it may borrow or issue standby letters of credit or commercial letters of credit up to $200,000. During 2004, the Credit Agreement was amended to extend the maturity to December 31, 2010 and increase the credit line from $165,000 at December 31, 2003 to $200,000 at December 31, 2004. The amended credit agreement provides lower interest rate brackets and modified certain covenants to provide greater flexibility. The Credit Agreement currently contains a detailed borrowing base formula that provides borrowing capacity to the Company based on

negotiated percentages of eligible accounts receivable, inventory and fixed assets. At December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately $53,941 of unused borrowing capacity available under the Credit Agreement. Interest is payable quarterly at either the bank’s prime lending rate (5.25% at December 31, 2004) or, at the Company’s election, at LIBOR plus .75%-2.25%. The Company’s ability to elect LIBOR-based interest as well as the overall interest rate are dependent on the Company’s Debt Service Coverage Ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement. Up to $20,000 in standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit may be issued under the Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2004, in addition to amounts borrowed under the Credit Agreement, there was $9,133 outstanding primarily for standby letters of credit. A fee of .25% is imposed by the bank on the unused portion of available borrowings. The Credit Agreement expires on December 31, 2010 and borrowings are secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.

A foreign subsidiary of the Company had outstanding standby letters of credit of $1,485 at December 31, 2004 under its credit arrangement.

The 8.375% Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of the Company and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis, by all domestic subsidiaries of the Company. Provisions of the indenture governing the 8.375% Notes and the Credit Agreement contain restrictions on the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, to create liens or other encumbrances, to make certain payments, investments, loans and guarantees and to sell or otherwise dispose of a substantial portion of assets or to merge or consolidate with an unaffiliated entity. At December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all financial covenants of the Credit Agreement.

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, borrowings under the credit agreement and the senior subordinated notes approximate fair value at December 31, 2004 and 2003.

The reasons for the difference between income tax expense and the amount computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate to income before income taxes are as follows:

Significant components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

At December 31, 2004, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of approximately $47,700, which will expire between 2021 and 2024. In accordance with the provisions of FAS 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”, the tax benefits related to these carryforwards have been fully reserved as of December 31, 2004 because the Company is in a three year cumulative loss position.

At December 31, 2004 the Company has research and developmental credit carryforwards of approximately $1,691 which will expire between 2010 and 2023. The Company also has an alternative minimum tax credit carryforward in the amount of approximately $1,020 which has an indefinite carryforward life.

The Company is subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are asserted in the ordinary course of business. While any litigation involves an element of uncertainty, in the opinion of management, liabilities, if any, arising from currently pending or

threatened litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

The following tables set forth the change in benefit obligation, plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet for the defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans as of December 31, 2004 and 2003:

The pension plan weighted-average asset allocation at year ended 2004 and 2003 and target allocation for 2004 are as follows:

The Company recorded a minimum pension liability of $4,838 at December 31, 2004 and $4,355 at December 31, 2003, as required by Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 87. The adjustment is reflected in other comprehensive income and long-term liabilities. The adjustment relates to two of the Company’s defined benefit plans, for which the accumulated benefit obligations of $17,458 at December 31, 2004 ($16,336 at December 31, 2003), exceed the fair value of the underlying pension assets of $13,247 at December 31, 2004 ($13,374 at December 31, 2003). Amounts were as follows:

The following tables summarize the assumptions used by the consulting actuary and the related cost information.

In determining its expected return on plan assets assumption for the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company considered historical experience, its asset allocation, expected future long-term rates of return for each major asset class, and an assumed long-term inflation rate. Based on these factors, the Company derived an expected return on plan assets for the year ended December 31, 2004 of 8.75%. This assumption was supported by the asset return generation model used by the Company’s independent actuaries, which projected future asset returns using simulation and asset class correlation.

For measurement purposes, a 10% percent annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2004. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5% for 2009 and remain at that level thereafter.

Below is a table summarizing the Company’s expected future benefit payments and the expected payments due to the Medicare subsidy over the next ten years:

The Company recorded $167 of non-cash pension curtailment charges in 2003 and $2,700 in 2002 related to the disposal or closure of three manufacturing facilities. These were classified as restructuring charges in each year.

The Company has two postretirement benefit plans. Under both of these plans, health care benefits are provided on both a contributory and noncontributory basis. The assumed health care cost trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:

The total contribution charged to pension expense for the Company’s defined contribution plans was $1,446 in 2004, $1,331 in 2003 and $1,273 in 2002. The Company expects to have no contributions to its defined benefit plans in 2005.

Rental expense for 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $10,588, $10,263 and $10,749, respectively. Future minimum lease commitments during each of the five years following December 31, 2004 are as follows: $9,820 in 2005, $7,632 in 2006, $5,030 in 2007, $3,993 in 2008, $3,094 in 2009 and $3,858 thereafter.

The Company operates through three segments: Integrated Logistics Solutions (“ILS”), Aluminum Products and Manufactured Products. ILS is a leading supply chain logistics provider of production components to large, multinational manufacturing companies, other manufacturers and distributors. In connection with the supply of such production components, ILS provides a variety of value-added, cost-effective supply chain management services. The principal customers of ILS are in the semiconductor equipment, heavy-duty truck, industrial equipment, aerospace and defense, electrical controls, HVAC, vehicle parts and accessories, appliances, and lawn and garden equipment industries. Aluminum Products manufactures cast aluminum components for automotive, agricultural equipment, heavy-duty truck and construction equipment. Aluminum Products also provides value-added services such as design and engineering, machining and assembly. Manufactured Products operates a diverse group of niche manufacturing businesses that design and manufacture a broad range of high quality products engineered for specific customer applications. The principal customers of Manufactured Products are original equipment manufacturers and end-users in the aerospace, automotive, railroad, truck and oil industries.

The Company’s sales are made through its own sales organization, distributors and representatives. Intersegment sales are immaterial and eliminated in consolidation and are not included in the figures presented. Intersegment sales are accounted for at values based on market prices. Income allocated to segments excludes certain corporate expenses and interest expense. Identifiable assets by industry segment include assets directly identified with those operations.

Corporate assets generally consist of cash and cash equivalents, deferred tax assets, property and equipment, and other assets.

The Company had sales of $95,610 in 2004 and $68,238 in 2003 to International Truck, which represented approximately 12% and 11% of consolidated net sales for each respective year. For 2002, sales to no single customer were greater than 10% of consolidated net sales.

The Company’s approximate percentage of net sales by geographic region were as follows:

At December 31, 2004, approximately 86% of the Company’s assets are maintained in the United States.

The components of accumulated comprehensive loss at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:

Since 2001, the Company has responded to the economic downturn by reducing costs in a variety of ways, including restructuring businesses and selling non-core manufacturing assets. These activities generated restructuring and asset impairment charges in 2001, 2002 and 2003, as the Company’s restructuring efforts continued and evolved.

During 2001, the Company recorded restructuring and asset impairment charges aggregating $28,462, primarily related to management’s decision to exit certain under-performing product lines and to close or consolidate certain operating facilities in 2002. The Company’s actions included 1) selling or discontinuing the businesses of Castle Rubber and Ajax Manufacturing, 2) closing the Cicero Flexible Products’ manufacturing facility and discontinue certain product lines, 3) inventory write-downs and other restructuring activities at St. Louis Screw & Bolt and Tocco, 4) closing twenty ILS supply chain logistics facilities and two ILS manufacturing plants, 5) closing an Aluminum Products machining facility, and 6) write-down of certain Corporate assets to current value. The charges were composed of $11,280 for the impairment of property and equipment and other long-term assets; $10,299 of cost of goods sold, primarily to write down inventory of discontinued businesses and product lines to current market value; and $6,883 for severance (525 employees) and exit costs. Below is a summary of these charges by segment.

During 2002, the Company recorded further restructuring and asset impairment charges aggregating $19,190, primarily related to management decisions to exit additional product lines and consolidate additional facilities. The Company’s planned actions included 1) selling or discontinuing the businesses of St. Louis Screw and Bolt and Green Bearing, 2) closing five additional supply chain logistics facilities and 3) closing or selling two Aluminum Products manufacturing plants (one of which was closed as of December 31, 2002). The charges were composed of $5,599 for severance (490 employees) and exit costs, $2,700 for pension curtailment costs; $5,628 of costs of goods sold, primarily to write down inventory of discontinued businesses and product lines to current market value; and $5,263 for impair-

ment of property and equipment and other long-term assets. Below is a summary of these charges by segment.

During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company continued its multi-year efforts to position the Company for renewed, more profitable growth and recorded restructuring and asset impairment charges aggregating $19,446. The action primarily related to restructuring at the Company’s Forge Group resulting from a decision to shut down its locomotive crankshaft forging plant after entering into a long-term supply contract to purchase these forgings from a third party. The charges were composed of $990 for exit costs; $638 of cost of goods sold primarily to write down inventory of discontinued product lines to current market value; $1,767 for pension curtailment and multi-employer pension plan withdrawal costs resulting primarily from the termination of union representation at the locomotive crankshaft forging plant and another Manufactured Products manufacturing facility and the closure of an Aluminum Products manufacturing plant; and $16,051 for impairment of property and equipment and other long-term assets. Below is a summary of these charges by segment.

The accrued liability for severance and exit costs and related cash payments consisted of:

As of December 31, 2004, all of the 525 employees identified in 2001 and all of the 490 employees identified in 2002 had been terminated. The workforce reductions under the restructuring plan consisted of hourly and salaried employees at various operating facilities due to either closure or consolidation.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had an accrued liability of $462 for future estimated employee severance and plant closing payments.

Idle fixed assets of $6,040 were included in other assets as of December 31, 2004. These consisted primarily of property, plant and equipment of two idled aluminum casting plants, for which the Company is evaluating new products and technologies. These assets may either be reclassified to property, plant and equipment if placed in service, or sold. They are currently carried at estimated fair value.

At December 31, 2004, the Company’s balance sheet reflected assets held for sale at their estimated current value of $3,027 for inventory, property, plant and equipment and other long-term assets. Net sales for the businesses that were included in net assets held for sale were $ -0- in 2004, $1,139 in 2003, and $19,159 in 2002. Operating income (loss), excluding restructuring and unusual charges for these entities were $ -0- in 2004, $(32) in 2003, and $(334) in 2002.

The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value. The Company has no derivative instruments that are classified as fair value hedges. Changes in the fair value of derivative instruments that are classified as cash flow hedges are recognized in other comprehensive income until such time as the hedged items are recognized in net income.

During the second quarter of 2004, the Company entered into forward contracts, for the purpose of hedging exposure to changes in the value of accounts receivable in Euros against the US dollar, for a notional amount of $5,075, of which $500 was outstanding at December 31, 2004. These transactions are considered cash flow hedges and, therefore, the fair market value at December 31, 2004 of a $75 loss, has been recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). Because there is no ineffectiveness on the cash flow hedges, all changes in fair value of these derivatives are recorded in equity and not included in the current period’s income statement. The $75 of loss on the fair value of the hedges is classified in current accrued liabilities. The Company recognized $169 of foreign currency losses upon settlement of the forward contracts.

There were no changes in nor disagreements with the Company’s independent auditors on accounting and financial disclosure matters within the two-year period ended December 31, 2004.

As of December 31, 2004, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon, and as of the date of, that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Management carried out an evaluation, with participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. The framework on which such evaluation was based is contained in the report entitled “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Report”). Management has identified no material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on the framework contained in the COSO Report, and has prepared Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included at page 16 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, have issued an attestation report on the Company’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. This attestation report is included at page 17 of this Form 10-K.

Information required by this item has been omitted pursuant to General Instruction I of Form 10-K.

The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for the audit of the Company’s and its parent’s annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:

Fees for audit services include fees associated with the annual audit, the reviews of the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, statutory audits required internationally, services associated with the Company’s issuance of the 8.375% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 and the audit of management’s assessment of internal control under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Audit-related fees principally included fees in connection with pension plan audits and accounting consultation. Tax fees include tax compliance and tax planning. Park-Ohio is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings and does not have a separate audit committee. Holdings’ audit committee has adopted a pre-approval policy for audit and non-audit related services. For a description of Holdings’ pre-approval policies for audit and non-audit related services and the percentage of audit-related, tax and all other services that were not pre-approved by Holdings’ audit committee pursuant to the de minimis exception, see Holdings’ proxy statement for the 2005 annual meeting of Holdings’ shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of Holdings’ fiscal year.


	All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are not applicable and, therefore, have been omitted.


	The exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-K are listed on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and are incorporated herein by reference.

	No annual report or proxy statement covering the Company’s last fiscal year has been or will be circulated to security holders.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	By:	/s/ RICHARD P. ELLIOTT



	Richard P. Elliott, Vice President
	and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


*	The undersigned, pursuant to a Power of Attorney executed by each of the Directors and officers identified above and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign and execute this report on behalf of each of the persons noted above, in the capacities indicated.






Ohio (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		34-6520107 ----------------------------------------------------- (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

23000 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices)		44117 (Zip Code)


	Integrated Logistics
	Solutions	Aluminum Products	Manufactured Products

NET SALES⁽¹⁾	$453.2 million (56% of total)	$135.4 million (17% of total)	$220.1 million (27% of total)
SELECTED PRODUCTS	Sourcing, planning and procurement of over 175,000 production components, including: • Fasteners • Pins • Valves • Hoses • Wire harnesses • Clamps and fittings • Rubber and plastic components	• Pump housings • Pinion carriers • Clutch retainers • Control arms • Knuckles • Brake calipers • Master cylinders	• Induction heating and melting systems • Pipe threading systems • Industrial oven systems • Injection molded rubber components • Forging presses
SELECTED INDUSTRIES SERVED	• Heavy-duty truck • Electrical controls • Automotive • Other vehicle • Industrial equipment • Power sports equipment • Lawn and garden • Semiconductor	• Automotive • Agricultural equipment • Construction equipment • Heavy-duty truck	• Steel • Automotive • Oil and gas • Rail • Aerospace and defense



	Year Ended
	December 31,									Acquired/
							Percent			(Divested)
	2004		2003		Change		Change			Sales

ILS	$	453.2	$	377.6	$	75.6		20	%	$	(1.0	)




Aluminum Products		135.4		90.1		45.3		50	%		30.4




Manufactured Products		220.1		156.6		63.5		41	%		15.9

Consolidated net sales	$	808.7	$	624.3	$	184.4		30	%	$	45.3



	Year Ended
	December 31,
									Percent
	2004			2003			Change		Change

Consolidated cost of products sold	$	682.6		$	527.6		$	155.0		29	%




Consolidated gross profit	$	126.1		$	96.7		$	29.4		30	%




Gross margin		15.6	%		15.5	%



	Year Ended
	December 31,
									Percent
	2004			2003			Change		Change

Consolidated SG&A expenses	$	76.7		$	62.4		$	14.3		23	%




SG&A as a percent of sales		9.5	%		10.0	%


	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities


Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


	*Selling, General & Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses:*


Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk


	Page

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting		16




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting		17




Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		18




Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2004 and 2003		19




Consolidated Statements of Operations — Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		20




Consolidated Statements of Shareholder’s Equity — Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		21




Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		22




Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		23



			Year Ended December 31,

			2004		2003			2002


			(Dollars in thousands)




Net sales			$	808,718	$	624,295		$	634,455




Cost of products sold				682,658		527,586			546,857

	Gross profit			126,060		96,709			87,598




Selling, general and administrative expenses				76,714		62,369			57,418




Restructuring and impairment charges				-0-		18,808			13,601

	Operating income			49,346		15,532			16,579




Interest expense				31,413		26,151			27,623

		Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change		17,933		(10,619	)		(11,044	)




Income taxes				3,400		904			897

		Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change		14,533		(11,523	)		(11,941	)




Cumulative effect of accounting change				-0-		-0-			(48,799	)

		Net income (loss)	$	14,533	$	(11,523	)	$	(60,740	)


									Accumulated
				Additional					Other
		Common		Paid-In		Retained			Comprehensive
		Stock		Capital		Earnings			Income (Loss)			Total


		(Dollars in thousands)




Balance at January 1, 2002		$	-0-	$	64,844	$	69,044		$	(4,252	)	$	129,636




Comprehensive (loss):




	Net loss						(60,740	)					(60,740	)




	Foreign currency translation adjustment									1,711			1,711




	Minimum pension liability									(5,555	)		(5,555	)

	Comprehensive (loss)												(64,584	)

Balance at December 31, 2002			-0-		64,844		8,304			(8,096	)		65,052




Comprehensive (loss):




	Net Loss						(11,523	)					(11,523	)




	Foreign currency translation adjustment									3,632			3,632




	Minimum pension liability									1,200			1,200

	Comprehensive (loss)												(6,691	)

Balance at December 31, 2003			-0-		64,844		(3,219	)		(3,264	)		58,361




Comprehensive income (loss):




	Net income						14,533						14,533




	Foreign currency translation adjustment									2,071			2,071




	Minimum pension liability									(483	)		(483	)

	Comprehensive income												16,121

Balance at December 31, 2004		$	-0-	$	64,844	$	11,314		$	(1,676	)	$	74,482


	Impairment Charge
Reporting	recorded effective		Goodwill at		Goodwill at
Segment	January 1, 2002		December 31, 2003		December 31, 2004

ILS	$	32,239	$	65,763	$	66,050




Aluminum Products		9,700		16,515		16,515




Manufactured Products		6,860		-0-		-0-

	$	48,799	$	82,278	$	82,565






Cash acquisition price		$	10,000
Assets




	Accounts receivable		(8,931	)




	Inventories		(1,677	)




	Property and equipment		(16,964	)




	Other		(115	)
Liabilities




	Accounts payable		4,041




	Compensation accruals		5,504




	Other accruals		8,142

Goodwill		$	-0-


Item 1.	Business


Item 2.	Properties


Item 6.	Selected Financial Data


	2004 versus 2003


	Severance		Exit		Relocation		Total

Balance at June 30, 2004	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-	$	-0-




Add: Accruals		1,916		100		265		2,281




Less: Payments		295		-0-		2		297

Balance at December 31, 2004	$	1,621	$	100	$	263	$	1,984



							Postretirement
	Pension						Benefits

	2004			2003			2004			2003

Change in benefit obligation




Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	53,075		$	52,481		$	27,366		$	24,869




Service cost		291			545			136			147




Curtailment and settlement		-0-			(208	)		-0-			-0-




Interest cost		3,320			3,498			1,532			1,701




Amendments		566			-0-			-0-			-0-




Actuarial losses (gains)		2,799			1,800			(637	)		3,758




Benefits and expenses paid, net of contributions		(4,748	)		(5,041	)		(3,717	)		(3,109	)

Benefit obligation at end of year	$	55,303		$	53,075		$	24,680		$	27,366

Change in plan assets




Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year	$	97,603		$	85,401		$	-0-		$	-0-




Actual return on plan assets		11,093			17,243			-0-			-0-




Company contributions		-0-			-0-			3,717			3,109




Benefits and expenses paid, net of contributions		(4,748	)		(5,041	)		(3,717	)		(3,109	)

Fair value of plan assets at end of year	$	103,948		$	97,603		$	-0-		$	-0-

Funded (underfunded) status of the plan	$	48,645		$	44,528		$	(24,680	)	$	(27,366	)




Unrecognized net transition obligation		(439	)		(487	)		-0-			-0-




Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss		(6,929	)		(7,235	)		4,639			5,375




Unrecognized prior service cost (benefit)		1,210			773			(247	)		(327	)

Net amount recognized at year end	$	42,487		$	37,579		$	(20,288	)	$	(22,318	)


		2004			2003

Prepaid pension cost		$	41,295		$	36,186




Accrued pension cost			(4,211	)		(2,962	)




Intangible asset			565			-0-




Accumulated other comprehensive loss			4,838			4,355

	Net amount recognized at the end of year	$	42,487		$	37,579



				Plan Assets

	Target 2005			2004			2003

Asset Category




Equity securities		60-70	%		66.7	%		64.8	%




Debt securities		20-30			20.5			26.0




Other		7-15			12.8			9.2

		100	%		100	%		100	%


	2004		2003

Projected benefit obligation	$	17,458	$	16,336

Accumulated benefit obligation	$	17,458	$	16,336

Fair value of plan assets	$	13,247	$	13,374



	Pension Benefits									Other Benefits

	2004			2003			2002			2004			2003			2002

Components of net periodic benefit cost




Service costs	$	291		$	545		$	399		$	136		$	147		$	204




Interest costs		3,320			3,498			3,556			1,532			1,701			1,712




Expected return on plan assets		(8,313	)		(7,229	)		(8,394	)		-0-			-0-			-0-




Transition obligation		(49	)		(49	)		(49	)		-0-			-0-			-0-




Amortization of prior service cost		129			257			319			(80	)		(80	)		(79	)




Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss		(286	)		361			(1,055	)		99			43			11

Benefit (income) costs	$	(4,908	)	$	(2,617	)	$	(5,224	)	$	1,687		$	1,811		$	1,848


	Pension		Other		Payments due to
	Benefits		Benefits		Medicare Subsidy

2005	$	4,512	$	2,881	$	-0-




2006		4,386		2,568		288




2007		4,303		2,482		290




2008		4,254		2,413		285




2009		4,285		2,319		278




2010 to 2014		20,567		9,875		1,199


	1-Percentage		1-Percentage
	Point		Point
	Increase		Decrease

Effect on total of service and interest cost components in 2004	$	129	$	110




Effect on post retirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 2004	$	1,797	$	1,558


	Cost of
	Products		Asset		Restructuring
	Sold		Impairment		& Severance		Total

Manufactured Products	$	8,599	$	10,080	$	2,030	$	20,709




ILS		1,700		600		4,070		6,370




Aluminum Products		-0-		-0-		783		783




Corporate		-0-		600		-0-		600

	$	10,299	$	11,280	$	6,883	$	28,462






Severance and exit charges recorded in 2001	$	6,883




Cash payments made in 2001		(2,731	)

Balance at December 31, 2001		4,152




Severance and exit charges recorded in 2002		5,599




Cash payments made in 2002		(5,706	)

Balance at December 31, 2002		4,045




Severance and exit charges recorded in 2003		990




Cash payments made in 2003		(2,500	)

Balance at December 31, 2004		2,535




Severance and exit charges recorded in 2004		-0-




Cash payments made in 2004		(2,073	)

Balance at December 31, 2004	$	462


Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant


Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions


	2004		2003

Audit fees	$	1,264,000	$	568,500




Audit-related fees		58,000		48,000




Tax fees		65,000		67,250



* Edward F. Crawford	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

* Richard P. Elliott	Vice President — and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
* Matthew V. Crawford	President and Director
* Patrick V. Auletta	Director
* Kevin R. Greene	Director
* Lewis E. Hatch, Jr.	Director	March 21, 2005
* Dan T. Moore	Director
* Lawrence O. Selhorst	Director
* Ronna Romney	Director
* James W. Wert	Director


Exhibit

	3	.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 333-43005 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
	3	.2	Code of Regulations of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 333-43005 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
	4	.1	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank One, NA and Banc One Capital Markets Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4 to the Form 10-Q of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
	4	.2	First Amendment, dated September 30, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties thereto, the lenders party thereto, Bank One, NA and Bank One Capital Markets, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. on October 1, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)
	4	.3	Second Amendment, dated December 29, 2004, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated November 5, 2003, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the other loan parties thereto, the lenders party thereto and JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA (successor by merger to Bank One, NA), as agent (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on January 5, 2005, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)
	4	.4	Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2004, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, NA, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on December 6, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)
	10	.1	Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. and each of its directors and certain officers (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1998, SEC File No. 333-43005 and incorporated by reference and made a part hereof)
	10	.2	Registration Rights Agreement, dated November 30, 2004, among Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., the Guarantors (as defined therein) and the initial purchasers that are party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K of Park-Ohio Holdings Corp. filed on December 6, 2004, SEC File No. 000-03134 and incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof)
	12	.1	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
	21	.1	List of Subsidiaries of Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.
	24	.1	Power of Attorney
	31	.1	Principal Executive Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	31	.2	Principal Financial Officer’s Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	32	.1	Certification requirement under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002