Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549


FORM 10-K

     
(Mark One)
 
x
  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
    FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
OR
 
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                 to                

Commission file number 1-11690

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Ohio
  34-1723097

 
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3300 Enterprise Parkway, Beachwood, Ohio 44122


(Address of principal executive offices — zip code)

(216) 755-5500


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
Name of each exchange on
Title of each class which registered


Common Shares, Without Par Value
  New York Stock Exchange
Depositary Shares Representing Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
  New York Stock Exchange
Depositary Shares Representing Class G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
  New York Stock Exchange
Depositary Shares Representing Class H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
  New York Stock Exchange
Depositary Shares Representing Class I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares
  New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None


(Title of class)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x    No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x    No o

     The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2004 was $3.6 billion.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

108,436,991 common shares outstanding as of February 28, 2005


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

     The registrant incorporates by reference in Part III hereof portions of its definitive Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

                 
Report
Item No. Page


       
 PART I
       
 1.       3  
 2.       14  
 3.       51  
 4.       51  
               
 5.       53  
 6.       54  
 7.       58  
 7a.       106  
 8.       109  
 9.       109  
 9a.       109  
 9b.       109  
               
 10.       110  
 11.       110  
 12.       111  
 13.       111  
 14.       111  
               
 15.       112  
 EX-10.10 Restricted Share Agreement
 EX-10.11 Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant Agreement
 EX-10.12 Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement
 EX-21.1 List of Subsidiaries
 EX-23.1 Consent of PriceWaterHouseCoopers LLP
 EX-31.1 CEO Cert
 EX-31.2 CFO Cert
 EX-32.1 CEO Cert
 EX-32.2 CFO Cert

2


Table of Contents

PART I

 
Item 1. BUSINESS
 
General Development of Business

      Developers Diversified Realty Corporation, an Ohio Corporation (the “Company” or “DDR”), a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (a “REIT”), is in the business of acquiring, developing, redeveloping, owning, leasing and managing shopping centers and business centers. Unless otherwise provided, references herein to the Company or DDR includes Developers Diversified Realty Corporation, its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and its joint ventures.

      From January 1, 2000 to February 28, 2005, the Company and its joint ventures have acquired 273 shopping center properties. The Company acquired 15 properties in 2005 (all of which are located in Puerto Rico), 112 in 2004 (including 18 of which were acquired through joint ventures and one of which the Company acquired its joint venture partner’s interest), 124 in 2003 (including 117 shopping center and development properties acquired through the merger with JDN Realty Corporation (“JDN”) and three of which were joint ventures), 11 in 2002 (four of which the Company acquired its joint venture interest), eight in 2001 (all of which were joint ventures) and three in 2000 (two of which were acquired through joint ventures). In addition in 2002, a joint venture in which the Company owns an approximate 25% equity interest was awarded the asset designation rights of Service Merchandise retail real estate interests in approximately 200 properties. At December 31, 2004, 63 of these properties remained. Also, in connection with the AIP merger on May 14, 2001, the Company effectively purchased 37 business centers and two shopping centers.

      The Company’s executive offices are located at 3300 Enterprise Parkway, Beachwood, Ohio 44122, and its telephone number is (216) 755-5500. The Company’s website is located at http://www.ddr.com. On its Website, you can obtain a copy of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company files such material electronically with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). A copy of these filings is available to all interested parties upon written request to Michelle M. Dawson, Vice President of Investor Relations at the Company’s corporate offices.

      The Company files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549. You may obtain information about the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC (http://www.sec.gov). You can inspect reports and other information that we file at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005.

 
Financial Information about Industry Segments

      The Company is in the business of acquiring, developing, redeveloping, owning, leasing and managing shopping centers and business centers. See the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for certain information required by Item 1.

 
Narrative Description of Business

      The Company’s portfolio as of February 28, 2005, consisted of 451 shopping centers and 32 business centers (including 166 properties which are owned through joint ventures) and more than 550 acres of undeveloped land (of which approximately 60 acres are owned through joint ventures) (the “Portfolio Properties”). From January 1, 2002 to February 28, 2005, the Company has acquired 262 shopping centers (including 21 properties owned through joint ventures) containing an aggregate of approximately 32 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”) owned by the Company for an aggregate purchase price of

3


Table of Contents

approximately $7.4 billion. During 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company completed expansions at 32 of its shopping centers.

      As of February 28, 2005, the Company was expanding 11 wholly-owned properties and four of its joint venture properties, and expects to commence expansions at one additional wholly-owned shopping center and one additional joint venture shopping centers in 2005. The Company, including its joint ventures, has also substantially completed the development of 22 shopping centers since December 31, 2002, at an aggregate cost of approximately $582.4 million aggregating approximately 4.1 million square feet of GLA. As of February 28, 2005, the Company had seven wholly-owned shopping centers under development.

      At December 31, 2004, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s shopping center portfolio was 94.7% as compared to 94.3% at December 31, 2003. The average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $10.79 at December 31, 2004, as compared to $10.82 at December 31, 2003. The slight decrease is due to the change in the properties in the portfolio.

      At December 31, 2004, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s wholly-owned shopping centers was 93.7%, as compared to 92.9% at December 31, 2003. The average annualized base rent per leased square foot at December 31, 2004 was $9.70 as compared to $9.53 at December 31, 2003.

      At December 31, 2004, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s joint venture shopping centers was 97.1% as compared to 98.5% at December 31, 2003. The average annualized base rent per leased square foot was $12.15 at December 31, 2004, as compared to $13.74 at December 31, 2003. The decrease in the average annualized base rent per leased square foot is primarily attributable to the formation of two new joint ventures which acquired two grocery-anchored portfolios in the fourth quarter of 2004.

      At December 31, 2004, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s business centers was 76.0%, as compared to 78.1% at December 31, 2003.

      The Company is self-administered and self-managed and, therefore, does not engage or pay for a REIT advisor. The Company manages all of the Portfolio Properties. At December 31, 2004, the Company owned and/or managed over 94 million total square feet of GLA, which included all of the Portfolio Properties and 13 properties owned by third parties.

 
Strategy and Philosophy

      The Company’s investment objective is to increase cash flow and the value of its Portfolio Properties and to seek continued growth through the selective acquisition, development, redevelopment, renovation and expansion of income-producing real estate properties, primarily shopping centers. In addition, the Company may also pursue the disposition of certain real estate assets and utilize the proceeds to repay debt, reinvest in other real estate assets and developments and for other corporate purposes. In pursuing its investment objective, the Company will continue to seek to acquire and develop high quality, well-located shopping centers with attractive initial yields and strong prospects for future cash flow growth and capital appreciation where the Company’s financial strength and management and leasing capabilities can enhance value.

      Management believes that opportunities to acquire existing shopping centers have been and will continue to be available to buyers with access to capital markets and institutional investors, such as the Company. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” within Item 7.

      The Company’s real estate strategy and philosophy is to grow its business through a combination of leasing, expansion, acquisition and development. The Company seeks to:

  •  Increase cash flows and property values through strategic leasing, re-tenanting, renovation and expansion of the Company’s portfolio;
 
  •  Continue to selectively acquire well-located, quality shopping centers (individually or in portfolio transactions) which have leases at rental rates below market rates or other cash flow growth or capital

4


Table of Contents

  appreciation potential where the Company’s financial strength, relationships with retailers and management capabilities can enhance value;
 
  •  Increase cash flows and property values by continuing to take advantage of attractive financing and refinancing opportunities (see “Recent Developments — Financings”);
 
  •  Increase per share cash flows through the strategic disposition of low growth assets and utilizing the proceeds to repay debt, invest in other real estate assets and/or developments and for other corporate purposes;
 
  •  Selectively develop the Company’s undeveloped parcels or new sites in areas with attractive demographics;
 
  •  Hold properties for long-term investment and place a strong emphasis on regular maintenance, periodic renovation and capital improvements and
 
  •  Continue to manage and develop the properties of others to generate fee income, subject to restrictions imposed by federal income tax laws, and create opportunities for acquisitions.

      As part of its ongoing business, the Company engages in discussions with public and private real estate entities regarding possible portfolio or asset acquisitions or business combinations.

      In addition, the Company intends to maintain a conservative debt capitalization ratio. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s debt to total market capitalization ratio, excluding the Company’s proportionate share of non-recourse indebtedness of its unconsolidated joint ventures, was approximately 0.33 to 1.0; and at February 28, 2005, this ratio was approximately 0.42 to 1.0, reflecting the Company’s $1.15 billion acquisition of 15 shopping centers in Puerto Rico in 2005. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s capitalization consisted of $2.7 billion of debt (excluding the Company’s proportionate share of joint venture mortgage debt aggregating $420.8 million as compared to $368.5 million in 2003), $705 million of preferred shares and $4.9 billion of market equity (market equity is defined as common shares and Operating Partnership Units (“OP Units”) outstanding multiplied by the closing price of the common shares on the New York Stock Exchange at December 31, 2004 of $44.37) resulting in a debt to total market capitalization ratio of .33 to 1.0 as compared to the ratios of .37 to 1.0 and .43 to 1.0 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Fluctuations in the market price of the Company’s common shares may cause this ratio to vary from time to time. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s total debt (excluding the effect of the fair value hedge which was $2.3 million at December 31, 2004) consisted of $2,167.1 million of fixed rate debt, including $80 million of variable rate debt, which has been effectively swapped to a weighted average fixed rate of approximately 2.8%, and $549.3 million of variable rate debt, including $60 million of fixed rate debt which has been effectively swapped to a weighted average variable rate.

      The strategy, philosophy, investment and financing policies of the Company, and its policies with respect to certain other activities, including its growth, debt capitalization, distributions, status as a REIT and operating policies, are determined by the Board of Directors. Although it has no present intention to do so, the Board of Directors may amend or revise these policies from time to time without a vote of the shareholders of the Company.

 
Recent Developments
 
Financings

      The Company has historically demonstrated its access to capital through both the public and private markets. The acquisitions, developments and expansions were generally financed through cash provided from operating activities, revolving credit facilities, mortgages assumed, construction loans, secured debt, unsecured public debt, common and preferred equity offerings, joint venture capital, OP Units and asset sales. Total debt outstanding at December 31, 2004 was approximately $2.7 billion as compared to approximately $2.1 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In 2004, the increase in the Company’s outstanding debt was due primarily to the acquisition of assets from Benderson Development Company, Inc., and related entities (“Benderson”).

5


Table of Contents

      A summary of the aggregate financings through the issuance of common shares, preferred shares, construction loans, medium term notes, term loans and OP Units (units issued by the Company’s partnerships) aggregated $4.5 billion during the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, is summarized as follows (in millions):

                             
2004 2003 2002



Equity:
                       
 
Common shares
  $ 737.4 (1)   $ 381.9 (5)   $ 119.2 (10)
 
Preferred shares
    170.0 (2)     435.0 (6)     150.0 (11)
     
     
     
 
   
Total equity
    907.4       816.9       269.2  
     
     
     
 
Debt:
                       
 
Construction and other secured loans
    55.4       61.2       183.3  
 
Permanent financing
          150.0 (7)      
 
Mortgage debt assumed
    420.2       183.6       9.7  
 
Tax increment financing
    8.6             7.3  
 
Medium term notes
    525.0 (3)     300.0 (8)     100.0  
 
Unsecured term loans
    200.0 (4)     300.0 (9)      
     
     
     
 
   
Total debt
    1,209.2       994.8       300.3  
     
     
     
 
    $ 2,116.6     $ 1,811.7     $ 569.5  
     
     
     
 


  (1)  Includes 15.0 million shares issued in May 2004 and 5.45 million shares in December 2004.
 
  (2)  Issuance of Class I 7.5% Preferred Shares.
 
  (3)  Includes $275 million five-year senior unsecured notes with a coupon rate of 3.875%. These notes are due January 30, 2009 and were offered at 99.584% of par. Also includes, $250 million seven-year senior unsecured notes with a coupon rate of 5.25%. These notes are due April 15, 2011 and were offered at 99.574% of par.
 
  (4)  This facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 0.75% and matures in May 2006. This facility has two one-year extension options to 2008.
 
  (5)  Issued as consideration in the merger with JDN.
 
  (6)  Includes issuance of $50 million of preferred voting shares in conjunction with the merger with JDN. Proceeds from the Class G 8.0% preferred shares issued were used to retire $180 million, Preferred OP Units with a weighted average rate of 8.95%. Proceeds from the Class H 7.375% preferred shares issued were used to retire the Company’s Class C 8.375% preferred shares, Class D 8.68% preferred shares and 9.375% preferred voting shares.
 
  (7)  Represents a $150 million secured financing for five years with interest at a coupon rate of 4.41%.
 
  (8)  Seven-year senior unsecured notes with a coupon rate of 4.625%. These notes are due August 1, 2010 and were offered at 99.843% of par.
 
  (9)  This facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.0% and had a one-year term. The Company exercised two six-month extension options and repaid this facility in March 2005. This facility has a balance of $150 million at December 31, 2004. The proceeds from this facility were primarily used to repay JDN’s revolving credit facility with outstanding principal of $229 million at the time of the merger and to repay $85 million of MOPPRS debt and a related call option prior to maturity on March 31, 2003.

  (10)  Approximately $50 million of common equity was issued in exchange for two shopping center assets and $35 million was issued in exchange for the replacement of $35 million of 8.5% Preferred OP Units.
 
  (11)  Proceeds from the Class F 8.6% preferred shares issued were used to retire the Company’s Class A 9.5% preferred shares and 9.44% Class B preferred shares aggregating $149.8 million.

     In September 2004, the Company was added to the S&P MidCap 400 Index.

      In September 2004, the Company had declared effective a $1.0 billion shelf registration statement with the SEC under which debt securities, preferred shares or common shares may be issued. At December 31, 2004, the

6


Table of Contents

Company had $754 million of debt securities, preferred shares or common shares which may be issued under this registration statement.

      In July 2004, the Company expanded its unsecured revolving credit facility from $650 million to $1.0 billion.

 
Property Acquisitions, Dispositions, Expansions and Development

      In 2004, the Company acquired the following shopping center assets:

                 
Gross
Purchase
Square Feet Price
Location (Thousands) (Millions)



Littleton, Colorado (1)
    228     $ 6.3  
Benderson Development Company (See 2004 Strategic Real Estate Transactions)
    12,501       2,014.4  
     
     
 
      12,729     $ 2,020.7  
     
     
 


(1)  Reflects the Company’s purchase price, net of debt assumed, associated with the acquisition of its partner’s 50% ownership interest.

      In 2004, the Company’s joint ventures acquired the following shopping center assets, not including those assets purchased from the Company or its joint ventures:

                 
Gross
Purchase
Square Feet Price
Location (Thousands) (Millions)



Buena Park, California (1)
    738     $ 91.5  
Kirkland, Washington (1)
    291       37.0  
Phoenix, Arizona (1)
    1,134       45.6  
San Antonio, Texas (2)
    N/A       N/A  
Benderson Development Company (3)
    2,497       299.0  
     
     
 
      4,660     $ 473.1  
     
     
 


(1)  The Company purchased a 20% equity interest.
 
(2)  The Company purchased an effective 10% equity interest. Approximately 16 acres of land were sold to Target for $2.5 million subsequent to the purchase. This project is currently under development.
 
(3)  The MDT Joint Venture acquired an indirect ownership interest in 23 retail properties. Eight of the properties acquired by the MDT Joint Venture were owned by the Company and one of the properties was held by the Company through a joint venture. These nine properties were valued at approximately $239 million. Fourteen of the properties acquired by the MDT Joint Venture were owned by Benderson and valued at approximately $299 million. The Company owns a 14.5% equity interest in the MDT Joint Venture.

7


Table of Contents

 
Dispositions

      In 2005, the Company sold the following properties:

                 
Square Feet Sales Price
Location (Thousands) (Millions)



Shopping Center Properties
               
Transfer to joint venture interests
               
Aurora, Colorado; Irving, Texas; Brookfield, Wisconsin; Plainville, Connecticut; Brandon, Florida (2 properties); Brown Deer, Wisconsin (2 properties) and Brentwood, Tennessee (1)
    1,778     $ 284.2  
     
     
 


(1)  The Company sold these assets to the MDT Joint Venture. The Company retained an effective 14.5% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount includes 100% of the selling price; the Company will eliminate that portion of the gain associated with its 14.5% ownership interest.

     In 2004, the Company sold the following properties:

                         
Square Feet Sales Price Gain (Loss)
Location (Thousands) (Millions) (Millions)




Shopping Center Properties
                       
Core Portfolio Properties (1)
    414     $ 17.8     $ 3.5  
Former JDN properties (2)
    270       38.9       2.6  
Transfer to joint venture interests
                       
Coon Rapids, Minnesota; Asheville, North Carolina; Murfreesboro, Tennessee; Nashville, Tennessee; Monaca, Pennsylvania; Fayetteville, Arkansas (2 properties); Erie, Pennsylvania; Columbia, South Carolina; Lewisville, Texas and Birmingham, Alabama (3)
    2,321       285.3       65.4  
Lawrenceville, Georgia; Lilburn, Georgia; Columbia, Tennessee; Farragut, Tennessee; Hamburg, New York; Arcade, New York; Avon, New York; Norwich, New York; Tonawanda, New York (2 properties); Hamlin, New York and Elmira, New York (4)
    1,168       128.6       4.2  
Loganville, Georgia; Goodlettsville, Tennessee; Oxford, Mississippi; Irondequoit, New York; Orchard Park, New York; Rochester, New York; Cheektowaga, New York; Jamestown, New York; Warsaw, New York; Ontario, New York; Leroy, New York; Chillicothe, Ohio and Amherst, New York (5)
    1,577       203.8       2.5  
Business Center Properties (6)
    94       8.3       1.9  
     
     
     
 
      5,844     $ 682.7     $ 80.1  
     
     
     
 


(1)  Properties located in Trinidad, Colorado; Waterbury, Connecticut; Hazard, Kentucky; Las Vegas, Nevada and North Olmsted, Ohio. Property in North Olmsted, Ohio represents the sale of an asset through the merchant building program. This property was consolidated into the Company with the adoption of FIN 46 in 2004.
 
(2)  Properties located in Canton, Georgia; Cumming, Georgia; Marietta, Georgia; Peachtree City, Georgia; Suwanee, Georgia; Sumter, South Carolina; Franklin, Tennessee and Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
 
(3)  The Company contributed eleven wholly-owned assets of the Company to the MDT joint venture. The Company retained an effective 14.5% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount includes 100% of the selling price; the Company eliminated that portion of the gain associated with its 14.5% ownership interest (See 2004 Strategic Real Estate Transactions).
 
(4)  The Company formed a new joint venture with PREI in 2004 and contributed 12 neighborhood grocery anchored retail properties of the Company. The Company retained a 10% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount

8


Table of Contents

includes 100% of the selling price; the Company eliminated that portion of the gain associated with its 10% ownership interest (See 2004 Strategic Real Estate Transactions).
 
(5)  The Company formed DDR Markaz II in 2004 and contributed 13 neighborhood grocery anchored retail properties of the Company. The Company retained a 20% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount includes 100% of the selling price; the Company eliminated that portion of the gain associated with its 20% ownership interest (See 2004 Strategic Real Estate Transactions).
 
(6)  Properties located in Sorrento, California and Mentor, Ohio.

     In 2004, the Company’s joint ventures sold the following shopping center properties, excluding the one property purchased by the Company as described above:

                                 
Company’s
Company’s Proportionate
Effective Share of
Ownership Square Feet Sales Price Gain
Location Percentage (Thousands) (Millions) (Millions)





Puente Hills, California (1)
    20 %     519     $ 66.2     $ 4.0  
Mission Viejo, California
    20 %     46       18.0       2.0  
San Antonio, Texas
    35 %     320       59.1       6.7  
Long Beach, California (1)
    24.75 %     85       16.6       1.3  
Service Merchandise locations
    25 %     692       20.7       0.5  
             
     
     
 
              1,662     $ 180.6     $ 14.5  
             
     
     
 


(1)  The joint venture sold a significant portion of the shopping center.

Strategic Real Estate Transactions

Caribbean Property Group

      In January 2005, the Company purchased 15 Puerto Rican retail real estate assets, totaling nearly 5.0 million square feet, from Caribbean Property Group, LLC (“CPG”). The total purchase price was approximately $1.15 billion. The financing for the transaction was provided by the assumption of approximately $660 million of existing debt and line of credit borrowings of approximately $449.5 million on the Company’s $1.0 billion senior unsecured credit facility and the application of a $30 million deposit funded in 2004. The availability on the line of credit was created by the Company’s $250 million common equity issuance in December 2004, $332 million of proceeds generated by sales of neighborhood grocery anchored centers to joint ventures and other recent asset sales, including $96.6 million of sales to the Company’s MDT Joint Venture.

Benderson Transaction

      In 2004, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase interests in 110 retail real estate assets with approximately 18.8 million square feet of GLA from Benderson. The purchase price of the assets, including associated expenses, was approximately $2.3 billion, including assumed debt and the value of a 2% equity interest in certain assets valued at approximately $16.2 million that Benderson retained as set forth below.

      The Company completed the purchase of 107 properties (of which 93 were purchased by the Company and 14 were purchased directly by the MDT Joint Venture) at various dates commencing May 14, 2004 through December 21, 2004. The remaining three properties will not be acquired.

      In conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of assets from Benderson, the following capital transactions were entered into aggregating $1.1 billion in net proceeds, in addition to the MDT Joint Venture discussed above, were completed:

  •  In May 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with Bank One, Wachovia and Wells Fargo for a $200 million three-year term loan with two one-year extension options at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 75 basis points.

9


Table of Contents

  •  In May 2004, the Company issued and sold 15,000,000 of DDR common shares with net proceeds of approximately $491 million.
 
  •  In May 2004, the Company issued and sold 6,800,000 depository shares, each representing 1/20 of a share of 7.50% Class I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares. Net proceeds from the sale of the depository shares were approximately $164.2 million.
 
  •  In April 2004, the Company issued $250 million, 5.25% seven-year notes through a private placement.

      With respect to this joint venture, Benderson will have the right to cause the joint venture to redeem its 2.0% interest for a price equal to the agreed upon value of the interest after 20 months from the initial acquisition, of approximately $16.2 million, adjusted to reflect changes in the price of the Company’s common shares during the period in which Benderson holds the 2.0% interest, less certain distributions Benderson receives from the joint venture. If Benderson exercises the foregoing right, the Company will have the right to satisfy the joint venture’s obligation by purchasing Benderson’s interest for cash or by issuing DDR common shares to Benderson. If Benderson does not elect to exercise its right to have its interest redeemed, the Company will have the right after 30 months from the initial acquisition to purchase that 2.0% interest for cash or common shares for a price determined in the same manner as if Benderson had elected to cause such redemption.

      The Company funded the transaction through a combination of new debt financing, the issuance of cumulative preferred shares and common shares (see Financings) and asset transfers to the MDT Joint Venture (see MDT Joint Venture), discussed above, lines of credit borrowings and assumed debt. With respect to assumed debt, the fair value of indebtedness assumed upon closing was approximately $400 million, which included an adjustment of approximately $30.0 million to fair value, based on rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities as of May 2004.

      The Benderson assets are located in eleven states, with over 80.0% of the GLA in New York and New Jersey. The Benderson assets were approximately 94.6% leased, including master lease units, at June 30, 2004, and the largest tenants, based on revenues, include Tops Markets (Ahold USA), Wal-Mart/ Sam’s Club, Home Depot and Dick’s Sporting Goods. Prior to the transaction, the Company owned less than 100,000 square feet of GLA in New York and approximately 2.7 million square feet of GLA in New Jersey.

      Benderson entered into a five-year master lease for certain vacant space that was either covered by a letter of intent as of the closing date or a new lease with respect to which the tenant had not begun to pay rent as of the closing date. During the five-year master lease, Benderson agreed to pay the rent for such vacant space until each applicable tenant’s rent commencement date. The Company recorded the master lease receivable as part of the purchase price allocation. Included in accounts receivable at December 31, 2004 is approximately $3.2 million related to a master lease obligation from Benderson.

MDT Joint Venture

      In November 2003, the Company closed a transaction pursuant to which the Company formed an Australian based Listed Property Trust, the Macquarie DDR Trust (“MDT”), with Macquarie Bank Limited (ASX: MBL), an international investment bank, advisor and manager of specialized real estate funds in Australia (“MDT Joint Venture”). MDT focuses on acquiring ownership interests in institutional-quality community center properties in the U.S. DDR remains responsible for all day-to-day operations of the properties and receives fees at prevailing rates for property management, leasing, construction management, acquisitions, due diligence, dispositions (including outparcel sales) and financing. Through their joint venture, DDR and MBL will also receive base asset management fees and incentive fees based on the performance of MDT. At December 31, 2004, MDT owned an approximate 83% interest in the portfolio. DDR retained an effective 14.5% ownership interest in the assets and MBL primarily owning the remaining 2.5%.

      In May 2004, the MDT Joint Venture acquired an indirect ownership interest in 23 retail properties, which consisted of over 4.0 million square feet of Company-owned GLA. The aggregate purchase price of the properties was approximately $538.0 million. Eight of the properties acquired by MDT Joint Venture were owned by the Company and one of the properties was held by the Company through a joint venture which aggregated

10


Table of Contents

approximately $239 million. Fourteen of the properties acquired by MDT were owned by Benderson and valued at approximately $299 million. In December 2004, the Company contributed three operating properties to the MDT Joint Venture for approximately $96.6 million. These transactions, aggregating $634.3 million, were funded by approximately $321.4 million of equity and $312.9 million of debt and assets and liabilities assumed. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $65.4 million relating to the sale of the effective 85.5% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $11.1 million relating to the Company’s effective 14.5% interest.

      Through March 15, 2005, the Company sold an additional nine properties to the MDT Joint Venture for approximately $284.2 million.

      The MDT Joint Venture has a two-year right of first offer which expires in March 2005 on 20 pre-determined joint venture and wholly-owned assets in DDR’s portfolio. This right of first offer only applies if DDR determines that it will pursue the sale of these assets. The MDT Joint Venture also is expected to pursue acquisitions of additional stabilized, institutional-quality community center properties.

      MDT is governed by a board of directors, which includes three members selected by DDR, three members selected by MBL and three independent members.

Coventry II

      In 2003, the Company entered into joint ventures (Coventry II Joint Venture”) with Coventry Real Estate Fund II (the “Coventry II Fund”). The Coventry II Fund was formed with several institutional investors and Coventry Real Estate Advisors (“CREA”) as the investment manager. Neither the Company nor any of its officers, own a common interest in the Coventry II Fund or have any incentive compensation tied to this Coventry II Fund. The Coventry II Fund and DDR have agreed to jointly acquire value-added retail properties in the United States. CREA obtained $330 million of equity commitments to co-invest exclusively in joint ventures with DDR. The Coventry II Fund’s strategy is to invest in a variety of retail properties that present opportunities for value creation, such as retenanting, market repositioning, redevelopment or expansion.

      DDR expects, but is not obligated, to co-invest 20% in each joint venture and will be responsible for day-to-day management of the properties. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture, DDR will earn fees for property management, leasing and construction management. DDR also will earn a promoted interest, along with CREA, above a 10% preferred return after return of capital to fund investors. The assets of the Coventry II Joint Venture at December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                         
Effective Square Feet Acquisition Price
Location Interest (thousands) (millions)




2004:
                       
Buena Park, California
    20 %     738     $ 91.5  
San Antonio, Texas
    10 %     Under Development (1)     8.1 (2)
Seattle, Washington
    20 %     291       37.0  
Phoenix, Arizona
    20 %     1,134       46.5  
2003:
                       
Kansas City, Missouri
    20 %     712       48.4  


(1)  Expected to be completed in Fall 2005. A third party developer owns 50% of this investment.
 
(2)  Net of $2.5 million sale to Target.

Prudential Joint Venture

      In October 2004, the Company completed a $128 million joint venture transaction (“DPG Joint Venture”) with Prudential Real Estate Investors (“PREI”). The Company contributed 12 neighborhood grocery-anchored retail properties to the joint venture, eight of which were acquired by the Company from Benderson and four of which were acquired from JDN. The joint venture assumed approximately $12 million of secured, non-recourse

11


Table of Contents

financing associated with two properties. The Company maintains a 10% ownership in the joint venture and continues day-to-day management of the assets. The Company earns fees for property management, leasing, and development. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $4.2 million relating to the sale of the 90% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $0.5 million relating to the Company’s 10% interest.

Kuwait Financial Centre Joint Venture II

      In November 2004, the Company completed a $204 million joint venture transaction (“DDR Markaz II”) with an investor group led by Kuwait Financial Centre-Markaz (a Kuwaiti publicly traded company). The Company contributed 13 neighborhood grocery-anchored retail properties to the joint venture, nine of which were acquired by the Company from Benderson, three of which were acquired from JDN and one of which was owned by the Company. DDR Markaz II obtained approximately $150 million of seven-year secured non-recourse financing at a fixed rate of approximately 5.1%. The Company maintains a 20% equity ownership in the joint venture and continues day-to-day management of the assets. The Company earns fees at prevailing rates for property management, leasing and development. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $2.5 million relating to the sale of the 80% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $0.7 million relating to the Company’s 20% interest.

Service Merchandise Joint Venture

      In March 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture with Lubert-Adler Funds and Klaff Realty, L.P., which was awarded asset designation rights for all of the retail real estate interests of the bankrupt estate of Service Merchandise Corporation. The Company has an approximate 25% interest in the joint venture. In addition, the Company earns fees for the management, leasing, development and disposition of the real estate portfolio. The designation rights enable the joint venture to determine the ultimate use and disposition of the real estate interests held by the bankrupt estate. At December 31, 2004, the portfolio consisted of 63 Service Merchandise retail sites totaling approximately 3.4 million square feet, of which 69.6% is leased or in the process of being leased.

      During 2004, the joint venture sold 11 sites and received gross proceeds of approximately $20.7 million and recorded an aggregate gain of $2.0 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was approximately $0.5 million. In 2004, the Company earned an aggregate of $1.4 million including disposition, development, management and leasing fees and interest income of $1.2 million relating to this investment. This joint venture has total assets and total debt of approximately $177.5 million and $62.6 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004. The Company’s investment in this joint venture was $27.2 million at December 31, 2004.

 
Expansions 2004

      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company completed seven expansion and redevelopment projects located in North Little Rock, Arkansas; Brandon, Florida; Starkville, Mississippi; Aurora, Ohio; Tiffin, Ohio; Monaca, Pennsylvania and Chattanooga, Tennessee at an aggregate cost of approximately $25.2 million. The Company is currently expanding/redeveloping 11 shopping centers located in Gadsden, Alabama; Tallahassee, Florida; Suwanee, Georgia; Ottumwa, Iowa; Gaylord, Michigan; Princeton, New Jersey; Hendersonville, North Carolina; Allentown, Pennsylvania; Erie, Pennsylvania; Brentwood, Tennessee and Johnson City, Tennessee at a projected incremental cost of approximately $33.9 million. The Company is also scheduled to commence construction on an additional expansion project at its shopping center located in Amherst, New York.

 
Development (Consolidated) 2004

      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company substantially completed the construction of seven shopping centers located in Long Beach, California; Fort Collins, Colorado; St. Louis, Missouri; Hamilton, New Jersey; Apex, North Carolina; Irving, Texas and Mesquite, Texas.

      The Company currently has seven shopping center projects under construction. These projects are located in Miami, Florida; Overland Park, Kansas; Chesterfield, Michigan; Lansing, Michigan; Freehold, New Jersey;

12


Table of Contents

Mount Laurel, New Jersey and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. These projects are scheduled for completion during 2005 and 2006 at a projected aggregate cost of approximately $235.3 million and will create an additional 2.5 million square feet of retail space. At December 31, 2004, approximately $153.8 million of costs were incurred in relation to these development projects.

      The Company anticipates commencing construction in 2005 on two additional shopping centers located in Norwood, Massachusetts and McKinney, Texas.

      The wholly-owned and consolidated development funding schedule as of December 31, 2004 is as follows (in millions):

           
Funded as of December 31, 2004
  $ 460.0 (1)
Projected net funding during 2005
    94.9 (2)
Projected net funding thereafter
    25.3 (2)
     
 
 
Total
  $ 580.2  
     
 


(1)  Amount includes funding for assets previously placed in service.
 
(2)  Amount will be reduced by additional proceeds to be obtained through construction loans.

 
Development (Joint Ventures) 2004

      The Company has joint venture development agreements for four shopping center projects. These projects have an aggregate projected cost of approximately $119 million. These projects are located in Jefferson County (St. Louis, Missouri); Apex, North Carolina (Phases III and IV), adjacent to a wholly-owned development project; and San Antonio, Texas. A portion of the project located in Jefferson County (St. Louis, Missouri) has been substantially completed. The remaining projects are scheduled for completion in 2005 and 2006. At December 31, 2004, approximately $24.5 million of costs were incurred in relation to these development projects.

 
Retail Environment

      During 2003, certain national and regional retailers experienced financial difficulties and several have filed for protection under bankruptcy laws. However, the Company’s occupancy rates have remained stable and lease rates have increased and rental rates have continued to grow. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s occupancy rate, lease rate and average rent per square foot were 94.7%, 95.4% and $10.79, respectively, compared to 94.3%, 95.1% and $10.82 at December 31, 2003. The slight decrease is due to the change in the properties in the portfolio.

      See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7 and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on certain of the recent developments described above.

 
Competition

      As one of the nation’s largest owners and developers of shopping centers, the Company has established close relationships with a large number of major national and regional retailers. Management is associated with and actively participates in many shopping center and REIT industry organizations.

      Notwithstanding these relationships, there are numerous developers and real estate companies that compete with the Company in seeking properties for acquisition and tenants who will lease space in these properties.

 
Employees

      As of February 28, 2005, the Company employed 523 full-time individuals, including executive, administrative and field personnel. The Company considers its relations with its personnel to be good.

13


Table of Contents

 
Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust

      The Company presently meets the qualification requirements of a REIT under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). As a result, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it meets certain requirements of the Code.

Item 2.     PROPERTIES

      At December 31, 2004, the Portfolio Properties included 436 shopping centers and 32 business centers (166 of which are owned through joint ventures). The shopping centers consist of 420 community shopping centers, 12 enclosed mini-malls and four lifestyle centers. The Portfolio Properties also include over 550 undeveloped acres primarily located adjacent to certain of the shopping centers. The shopping centers aggregate approximately 71 million square feet of Company-owned GLA (approximately 96 million square feet of total GLA) and are located in 44 states, principally in the East and Midwest, with significant concentrations in New York, Florida and Ohio. The business centers aggregate 4.0 million square feet of Company owned GLA and are located in 11 states, primarily in Texas.

      The Company’s shopping centers are designed to attract local area customers and are typically anchored by two or more national tenant anchors and often include a supermarket, drug store, junior department store and/or other major “category-killer” discount retailers as additional anchors. The shopping centers are typically anchored by a Wal-Mart, Kohl’s or Target. The tenants of the shopping centers typically offer day-to-day necessities rather than high-priced luxury items. As one of the nation’s largest owners and operators of shopping centers, the Company has established close relationships with a large number of major national and regional retailers, many of which occupy space in the shopping centers.

      Shopping centers make up the largest portion of the Company’s portfolio, comprising 66.7 million (94.0%) square feet of Company-owned GLA, enclosed mini-malls account for 2.9 million (4.0%) square feet of Company-owned GLA and the lifestyle centers account for 1.4 million (2.0%) square feet of the Company-owned GLA. On December 31, 2004, the average annualized base rent per square foot of Company-owned GLA of the Company’s wholly-owned shopping centers was $9.70, and those owned through joint ventures was $12.15. The average annualized base rent per square foot of the Company’s business centers was $9.23.

14


Table of Contents

      The following table sets forth, at December 31, 2004, information as to anchor and/or national retail tenants which individually accounted for at least 1.0% of total annualized base rent of the wholly-owned properties and the Company’s proportionate share of joint venture properties:

                 
% of Total
Shopping Center % of Total Shopping
Tenant Base Rent Center GLA



Wal-Mart
    4.4%       6.9%  
Tops
    3.5%       2.9%  
PETsMART
    2.5%       1.9%  
T.J. Maxx/ Marshalls
    2.4%       2.7%  
Kohl’s
    2.3%       2.7%  
Bed Bath & Beyond
    2.2%       1.7%  
Lowe’s Home Improvement Warehouse
    2.0%       2.7%  
Michaels
    1.6%       1.3%  
Home Depot
    1.5%       1.8%  
OfficeMax
    1.5%       1.4%  
Barnes & Noble
    1.4%       0.8%  
The Gap/ Old Navy
    1.3%       0.8%  
Best Buy
    1.2%       0.9%  
Linens ’N Things
    1.2%       0.8%  
Toys ’R’ Us
    1.1%       1.4%  
Ross Dress for Less
    1.1%       1.0%  
Staples
    1.0%       0.9%  
AMC Theatres
    1.0%       0.4%  
Dollar Tree
    1.0%       1.0%  
Office Depot
    1.0%       1.0%  
Dick’s Sporting Goods
    1.0%       0.9%  

15


Table of Contents

      The following table sets forth, at December 31, 2004, information as to anchor and/or national retail tenants which individually accounted for at least 1.0% of total annualized base rent of the wholly-owned properties and the Company’s joint venture properties:

                                 
Wholly-owned properties Joint venture properties


% of % of % of % of
Shopping Company- Shopping Company-
Center Base owned Center Base owned
Rental Shopping Rental Shopping
Tenant Revenues Center GLA Revenues Center GLA





Wal-Mart
    5.0%       7.8%       2.9%       4.6%  
Tops
    3.8%       3.1%       3.8%       4.4%  
Kohl’s
    2.3%       2.8%       2.7%       4.1%  
Lowe’s Home Improvement
    2.3%       3.2%       0.7%       1.1%  
PETsMART
    2.2%       1.6%       2.0%       1.9%  
T. J. Maxx/ Marshalls
    2.1%       2.5%       2.6%       3.0%  
Bed Bath & Beyond
    1.9%       1.5%       1.9%       1.9%  
Home Depot
    1.8%       2.0%       0.8%       0.8%  
OfficeMax
    1.5%       1.4%       1.8%       1.8%  
Michaels
    1.4%       1.1%       1.4%       1.4%  
Barnes & Noble/ B. Dalton
    1.3%       0.7%       2.3%       1.5%  
The Gap/ Old Navy
    1.3%       0.8%       1.4%       0.9%  
Linens ’N Things
    1.2%       0.7%       1.4%       1.3%  
Best Buy
    1.2%       0.9%       1.4%       1.3%  
Dollar Tree
    1.1%       1.1%       0.6%       0.8%  
Dick’s Sporting
    1.1%       0.9%       1.2%       1.2%  
Toys ’R’ Us
    1.1%       1.3%       0.9%       1.4%  
Cinemark Theatres
    1.0%       0.6%       0.6%       0.5%  
Staples
    1.0%       0.9%       0.6%       0.6%  
Ross Dress for Less
    1.0%       0.9%       1.9%       2.1%  
Regal Cinemas
    1.0%       0.6%       0.3%       0.5%  
Office Depot
    1.0%       1.0%       0.8%       0.8%  
Sports Authority
    1.0%       0.7%       0.6%       0.4%  
Goody’s
    0.9%       1.1%       0.2%       0.3%  
Circuit City
    0.8%       0.6%       1.7%       1.6%  
AMC Theatres
    0.7%       0.2%       1.7%       1.4%  
Kroger
    0.7%       1.2%       1.2%       1.8%  
Pier 1 Imports
    0.6%       0.3%       1.0%       0.6%  
Jo-Ann Fabrics
    0.9%       0.9%       1.0%       1.1%  
Famous Footwear
    0.6%       0.3%       1.0%       0.7%  

      In addition, as of December 31, 2004, unless otherwise indicated, with respect to the 436 shopping centers:

  •  119 of these properties are anchored by a Wal-Mart, Kohl’s or Target store;
 
  •  These properties range in size from 10,000 square feet to approximately 1,100,000 square feet of total GLA (with 61 properties exceeding 400,000 square feet of total GLA);
 
  •  Approximately 65.0% of the Company-owned GLA of these properties is leased to national chains, including subsidiaries, with approximately 20.1% of the Company-owned GLA leased to regional chains and approximately 9.6% of the Company-owned GLA leased to local tenants;

16


Table of Contents

  •  Approximately 94.7% of the aggregate Company-owned GLA of these properties was occupied as of December 31, 2004 (and, with respect to the properties owned by the Company at December 31, for each of the five years beginning with 2000, between 94.3% and 95.2% of aggregate Company-owned GLA of these properties was occupied);
 
  •  Eleven wholly-owned properties are currently being expanded by the Company and four properties are being expanded which are owned by joint ventures. The Company is pursuing the expansion of one additional wholly-owned property and one joint venture property and
 
  •  Seven wholly-owned properties are currently being developed by the Company.

Tenant Lease Expirations and Renewals

      The following table shows tenant lease expirations for the next ten years at the Company’s shopping centers, including joint ventures, and business centers assuming that none of the tenants exercise any of their renewal options:

     

                                                 
Average
Base Percentage of Percentage of
Rent Per Total Leased Total Base
Annualized Sq. Foot Sq. Footage Rental Revenues
No. of Approximate Base Rent Under Represented Represented
Expiration Leases Lease Area in Under Expiring Expiring by Expiring Expiring
Year Expiring Square Feet Leases Leases Leases Leases







2005
    1,051       4,597,848     $ 49,005,570     $ 10.66       6.7 %     6.8 %
2006
    992       4,551,184     $ 51,306,006     $ 11.27       6.6 %     7.1 %
2007
    1,045       5,445,281     $ 60,089,071     $ 11.04       8.0 %     8.3 %
2008
    805       4,940,244     $ 54,755,906     $ 11.08       7.2 %     7.6 %
2009
    843       6,281,716     $ 65,953,560     $ 10.50       9.2 %     9.1 %
2010
    398       5,015,744     $ 49,091,389     $ 9.79       7.3 %     6.8 %
2011
    332       5,398,567     $ 62,995,195     $ 11.67       7.9 %     8.7 %
2012
    254       4,524,561     $ 49,370,904     $ 10.91       6.6 %     6.8 %
2013
    234       4,044,442     $ 42,574,665     $ 10.53       5.9 %     5.9 %
2014
    225       4,423,036     $ 48,287,816     $ 10.92       6.5 %     6.7 %
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
    6,179       49,222,623     $ 533,430,082     $ 10.84       71.9 %     73.8 %

      The rental payments under certain of these leases will remain constant until the expiration of their base terms, regardless of inflationary increases. There can be no assurance that any of these leases will be renewed or that any new tenants will be obtained if not renewed.

      The Company owns approximately 550 undeveloped acres which generally consist of outlots, retail pads and expansion pads primarily located adjacent to certain of the shopping centers. The Company is pursuing an active marketing program to lease, develop or sell its undeveloped acres.

17


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation

Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








    Alabama                                                    
   
                                                   
1   Birmingham, AL (Brook)   Brook Highland Plaza
5291 Hwy 280 South
    35242       SC       Fee       1994       1994       100 %
2   Birmingham, AL (Eastwood)   Eastwood Festival Center
7001 Crestwood Blvd
    35210       SC       Fee       1989       1995       100 %
3   Birmingham, AL (Riverchase)   Riverchase Promenade
Montgomery Highway
    35244       SC       Fee (3)     1989       2002       14.5 %
4   Gadsden, AL   East Side Plaza
3010-3036 E. Meighan Boulevard
    35903       SC       Fee       1979       2003       100 %
5   Opelika, AL   Pepperell Corners
2300-2600 Pepperell Parkway Op
    36801       SC       Fee       1995       2003       100 %
6   Scottsboro, AL   Scottsboro Marketplace
24833 John P Reid Parkway
    35766       SC       Fee       1999       2003       100 %
    Arizona                                                    
   
                                                   
7   Ahwatukee, AZ   Foothills Towne Ctr (II)
4711 East Ray Road
    85044       SC       Fee (3)     1996       1997       50 %
8   Phoenix, AZ   Paradise Village Gateway
Tatum & Shea Blvds.
    85028       SC       Fee (3)     1997       2003       67 %
9   Phoenix, AZ (Deer Valley)   Deer Valley Towne Center
2805 West Agua Fria Freeway
    85027       SC       Fee (3)     1996       1999       50 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





 
1     423,493     $ 4,378,828     $ 9.15       95.6 %   Winn Dixie Stores (2014), Rhodes/ Marks Fitzgerald (2004), Goody’s (2009), Regal Cinemas, Inc. (2014), Stein Mart (2011), OfficeMax (2011), Michaels (2009), Books-A-Million (2010), Ross Stores (2014), Lowes Home Centers (Not Owned)
2     301,074     $ 1,894,282     $ 7.51       83.7 %   Office Depot (2007), Dollar Tree (2009), Burlington Coat Factory (2008), Regal Cinemas, Inc. (2006), Home Depot (Not Owned), Western Supermarkets (Not Owned)
3     98,016     $ 1,177,041     $ 12.01       100 %   Marshall’s (2006), Goody’s (Not Owned), Toys R Us (Not Owned), Kids R Us (Not Owned)
4     85,196     $ 279,165     $ 4.90       66.8 %    
 
5     190,127     $ 1,166,584     $ 6.51       94.2 %   Lowe’s (2012), Winn-Dixie (2013), Goody’s (2010)
6     40,560     $ 438,012     $ 10.80       100 %   Goody’s (2011), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
 
7     647,904     $ 9,565,394     $ 14.60       97.5 %   Bassett Furniture (2010), Ashley Homestores (2011), Stein Mart (2011), AMC Theatre (2021), Barnes & Noble (2012), Babies R Us (2007), Ross Stores, Inc. (2007), OfficeMax (2012), Jo-Ann, Etc. (2010), Best Buy (2014)
8     223,207     $ 3,995,177     $ 16.71       95.2 %   Bed Bath & Beyond (2011), Ross (2007), PetsMart (2015), Staples (2005), Albertsons-Osco Drug (Not Owned)
9     197,009     $ 3,054,609     $ 15.50       100 %   Ross Stores (2009), OfficeMax (2013), PetsMart (2014), Michaels (2009), Target (Not Owned), AMC Theatres (Not Owned)

18


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








10   Phoenix, AZ (Peoria)   Arrowhead Crossing
7553 West Bell Road
    85382       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1996       50 %
11   Phoenix, AZ (Spe)   Phoenix Spectrum Mall
1703 West Bethany Home Road
    85015       SC       GL (3)     1961       2004       20 %
    Arkansas                                                    
   
                                                   
12   Fayetteville, AR   Spring Creek Centre
464 E. Joyce Boulevard
    72703       SC       Fee (3)     1997       1997       14.5 %
13   Fayetteville, AR (Steele)   Steele Crossing
3533 N. Shiloh Dr.
    72703       SC       Fee (3)     2003       2003       14.5 %
14   N. Little Rock, AR   McCain Plaza
4124 East McCain Boulevard
    72117       SC       Fee       1991       1994       100 %
15   Russellville, AR   Valley Park Centre
3093 East Main Street
    72801       SC       Fee       1992       1994       100 %
    California                                                    
   
                                                   
16   Buena Park, CA   Buena Park Place
100 Buena Park
    90620       SC       Fee (3)     1965       2004       20 %
17   City Of Industry, CA (I)   Plaza at Puente Hills
17647-18271 Gale Avenue
    91748       SC       Fee (3)     1987       2001       20 %
18   Lancaster, CA   Valley Central - Discount
44707-44765 Valley Central Way
    93536       SC       Fee (3)     1990       2001       20 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





10     346,428     $ 4,243,041     $ 12.25       100 %   Staples (2009), CompUSA (2013), Mac Frugal’s (2010), Barnes & Noble (2011), T.J. Maxx (2005), Circuit City (2016), Oshman’s Sporting Goods (2017), Bassett Furniture (2009), Linens ’N Things (2011), Fry’s (Not Owned)
11     465,306     $ 5,681,050     $ 8.40       100 %   Costco Wholesale Corp (2020), Ross Dress For Less (2013), PetsMart (2044), Harkins Theatre (2002), Spectrum Cinemas (2005), Wal-Mart (Not Owned), Dillard’s (Not Owned)
 
12     262,827     $ 2,967,878     $ 11.29       100 %   T.J. Maxx (2005), Best Buy (2017), Goody’s (2013), Old Navy (2005), Bed Bath & Beyond (2009), Wal- Mart Super Center (Not Owned), Home Depot (Not Owned)
13     50,293     $ 989,215     $ 14.08       100 %   Kohl’s (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned)
14     295,013     $ 1,807,718     $ 6.66       92 %   Bed Bath & Beyond (2013), T.J. Maxx (2007), Cinemark Theatre- Tandy (2011), Burlington Coat Factory Whse (2014), Michaels Stores (2014), Sports Authority (2013)
15     272,245     $ 1,661,497     $ 6.41       95.2 %   Wal-Mart (2011), Stage (2010), J.C. Penney (2012)
 
16     737,533     $ 8,350,263     $ 14.65       77.3 %   DSW Shoe Warehouse (2013), Ross Dress For Less (2010), Bed Bath & Beyond (2011), Burlington Coat Factory (2011), Krikorian Premier Theatres (2023), Circuit City (2018), Kohl’s Department Store (2024), Michaels (2014)
17     53,057     $ 852,137     $ 23.80       67.5 %   Sam’s Club (Not Owned), Toys R Us (Not Owned), Sam Ash Music (Not Owned), Office Depot (Not Owned)
18     336,403     $ 3,959,983     $ 11.35       99.3 %   Wal-Mart (2010), Movies 12/ Cinemark (2017), Marshall’s (2007), Circuit City (2011), Staples (2008), Costco (Not Owned)

19


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








19   Long Beach, CA   City Place
95 South Pine Ave
    90802       SC       Fee (3)     2002       1*       24.75 %
20   Oceanside, CA   Ocean Place Cinemas
401-409 Mission Avenue
    92054       SC       Fee       2000       1*       100 %
21   Pasadena, CA   Paseo Colorado
280 East Colorado Blvd.
    91101       LC       Fee (3)     2001       2003       25 %
22   Pleasant Hill, CA   Downtown Pleasant Hill
2255 Contra Costa Blvd #101
    94523       SC       Fee (3)     1999       2001       20 %
23   Richmond, CA (Hilltop)   Hilltop Plaza
3401 Blume Drive
    94806       SC       Fee (3)     1996       2002       20 %
24   Richmond, CA   Richmond City Center
MacDonald Avenue
    94801       SC       Fee (3)     1993       2001       20 %
25   San Francisco, CA (Retail)   Van Ness Plaza 215
1000 Van Ness Avenue
    94109       SC       GL       1998       2002       100 %
26   San Ysidro, CA   San Ysidro Village
Camino de la Plaza
    92173       SC       Fee (3)     1988       2000       20 %
    Colorado                                                    
   
                                                   
27
  Alamosa, CO   Alamosa Plaza
145 Craft Drive
    81101       SC       Fee       1986       2*       100 %
28   Aurora, CO   Pioneer Hills
5400-5820 South Parker
    80012       SC       Fee       2003       2003       100 %
29   Broomfield, CO   Flatiron Marketplace Garden
1 West Flatiron Circle
    80021       SC       Fee       2001       2003       100 %
30   Denver, CO   Tamarac Square
7777 E. Hampden
    80231       SC       Fee       1976       2001       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





19     295,309     $ 4,199,646     $ 14.63       97.2 %   Nordstrom, Inc. (2012), Ross Stores, Inc (2013), Wal-Mart (2022), Mrs. Fields (2013), Albertson’s/Sold Property (Not Owned)
20     80,450     $ 1,083,050     $ 15.63       86.1 %   Regal Cinemas (2014)
21     556,991     $ 11,279,978     $ 21.62       93.7 %   Gelson’s Market (2021), Equinox (2017), Macy’s (2010), Pacific Theatres Exhib. Corp (2016), DSW Shoe Warehouse (2011), J. Jill (2012), Delmonicos Seafood (2012), P.F. Changs China Bistro (2016), Bombay Company (2011), Tommy Bahama (2011), Sephora (2011)
22     347,678     $ 6,411,260     $ 19.41       93.1 %   Albertson’s (2020), Michaels (2010), Borders Book & Music (2015), Century Theatres, Inc (2016), Bed Bath & Beyond (2010), Ross Stores (2010)
23     245,774     $ 3,674,540     $ 14.95       100 %   OfficeMax (2011), PetsMart (2012), Ross Dress For Less (2008), Barnes & Noble Booksellers (2011), Circuit City (2017), Century Theatre (2016)
24     76,692     $ 1,232,846     $ 16.08       100 %   Food 4 Less/Foodsco (2013)
25     123,755     $ 3,795,587     $ 36.77       83.4 %   AMC Van Ness 14 Theatres (2030), Crunch Fitness Int’l, Inc. (2008)
26     160,668     $ 2,136,068     $ 13.60       82.4 %   Ross Dress For Less (2014), Marshall’s (2013), K-Mart (Not Owned)
27
    19,875     $ 113,445     $ 7.34       94.6 %   City Market, Inc. (Not Owned), Big ‘R’ (Not Owned)
28     127,643     $ 2,348,619     $ 16.93       99.2 %   Bed Bath & Beyond (2012), Office Depot (2017), Home Depot (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
29     245,217     $ 5,162,361     $ 20.61       98.2 %   Best Buy (2016), Office Depot (2016), Nordstrom (2011), Linens ’N Things (2017), Great Indoors (Not Owned)
30     174,780     $ 1,873,600     $ 13.01       72.3 %    

20


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








31   Denver, CO
(Centennial)
  Centennial Promenade
9555 E. County Line Road
    80223       SC       Fee       1997       1997       100 %
32   Denver, CO
(University)
  University Hills
2730 South Colorado Boulevard
    80222       SC       Fee       1997       2003       100 %
33   Fort Collins, CO   Mulberry And Lemay Crossings
Mulberry St. & S. Lemay Ave.
    80525       SC       Fee       2004       2003       100 %
34   Littleton, CO   Aspen Grove
7301 South Santa Fe
    80120       LC       Fee (3)     2002       1*       100 %
35   Parker, CO (Flatacres)   Flatacres Marketcenter
South Parker Road
    80134       SC       GL       2003       1*       100 %
36   Parker, CO (Pavilions)   Parker Pavilions
11153 -11183 South Parker Road
    80134       SC       Fee       2003       2003       100 %
    Connecticut                                                    
   
                                                   
37   Plainville, CT   Connecticut Commons
I-84 & Rte 9
    06062       SC       Fee       1999       1*       100 %
    Florida                                                    
   
                                                   
38   Bayonet Point, FL   Point Plaza
Us 19 & Sr 52
    34667       SC       Fee       1985       2*       100 %
39   Brandon, FL   K-mart Shopping Center
1602 Brandon Bl
    33511       SC       GL       1972       2*       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





31     408,337     $ 6,204,924     $ 15.91       95.5 %   Golfsmith Golf Center (2007), Soundtrack (2017), Ross Dress For Less (2008), OfficeMax (2012), Michaels (2007), Toys R Us (2011), Borders (2017), Loehmann’s R.E. Holdings, Inc. (2012), Home Depot (Not Owned), Recreational Equipment (Not Owned)
32     244,383     $ 3,636,839     $ 15.98       93.1 %   Linens ’N Things (2013), Pier 1 Imports (2014), OfficeMax (2012), King Soopers/Krogers (2017)
33     18,988     $ 364,353     $ 22.19       86.5 %   Wal-Mart (Not Owned), Home Depot (Not Owned)
34     227,800     $ 6,769,489     $ 28.14       98.7 %   Coldwater Creek (2011), Talbots (2012), Ann Taylor (2012), J. Crew (2012), Banana Republic (2012), Gap (2012), Williams-Sonoma (2014), J. Jill (2012), Bombay Company (2012), Pottery Barn (2014), Pier 1 Imports (2011), Joseph A. Bank Clothiers (2012), Buca di Beppo (2013), Champps (2022)
35     111,844     $ 1,872,286     $ 14.27       98.7 %   Bed Bath & Beyond (2014), Gart Sports (2014), Michaels (2013), Kohl’s (Not Owned)
36     86,987     $ 1,560,334     $ 17.71       94.7 %    
 
 
37     439,271     $ 6,119,772     $ 11.66       100 %   Lowe’s Of Plainville (2019), Kohl’s (2022), Dick’s Sporting Goods (2020), PetsMart (2014), A.C. Moore (2014), Old Navy (2011), Levitz Furniture (2015), Linens ’N Things (2017), Plainville Theatre (Not owned), Loews Theatre (Not owned)
 
38     209,720     $ 1,326,058     $ 6.36       99.4 %   Publix Super Markets (2005), Beall’s (2014), T.J. Maxx (2010)
39     161,900     $ 639,863     $ 2.96       94.5 %   K-Mart (2007), Kane Furniture (Not Owned)

21


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








40
  Brandon, FL (Plaza)   Lake Brandon Plaza
Causeway Boulevard
    33511       SC       Fee       1999       2003       100 %
41   Brandon, FL (Village)   Lake Brandon Village
Causeway Boulevard
    33511       SC       Fee       1997       2003       100 %
42   Crystal River, FL   Crystal River Plaza
420 Sun Coast Hwy
    33523       SC       Fee       1986       2*       100 %
43   Daytona Beach, FL   Volusia
1808 W. International Speedway
    32114       SC       Fee       1984       2001       100 %
44   Englewood, FL   Rotonda Plaza
5855 Placida Road
    34224       SC       Fee       1991       2004       100 %
45   Fern Park, FL   Fern Park Shopping Center
6735 Us #17-92 South
    32720       SC       Fee       1970       2*       100 %
46   Gulf Breeze, FL   Gulf Breeze Marketplace
3749-3767 Gulf Breeze Parkway
    32561       SC       Fee       1998       2003       100 %
47   Jacksonville, FL   Jacksonville Regional
3000 Dunn Avenue
    32218       SC       Fee       1988       1995       100 %
48   Jacksonville, FL   Arlington Road Plaza
(Arlington Rd)
926 Arlington Road
    32211       SC       Fee       1990       2004       100 %
49   Lakeland, FL (Highlands)   Highlands Plaza Shopping Ctr
2228 Lakelands Highland Road
    33803       SC       Fee       1990       2004       100 %
50   Lantana, FL   Meadows Square
Hypoluxu Road & Congress Ave
    33461       SC       Fee       1986       2004       100 %
51   Marianna, FL   The Crossroads
2814-2822 Highway 71
    32446       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
52   Melbourne, FL   Melbourne Shopping Center
750-850 Apollo Boulevard
    32935       SC       GL       1978       2*       100 %
53   Naples, FL   Carillon Place
5010 Airport Road North
    33942       SC       Fee (3)     1994       1995       14.5 %
54   Ocala, FL   Ocala West
2400 SW College Road
    32674       SC       Fee       1991       2003       100 %
55   Orange Park, FL
(The Village)
  The Village Shopping Center
950 Blanding Boulevard
    32065       SC       Fee       1993       2004       100 %
56   Ormond Beach, FL   Ormond Towne Square
1458 West Granada Blvd
    32174       SC       Fee       1993       1994       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





40
    148,267     $ 1,843,752     $ 11.36       100 %   CompUSA (2017), Jo-Ann Fabrics (2017), Publix Super Markets (2019), Babies R Us (Not Owned)
41     113,986     $ 1,479,328     $ 12.98       100 %   Linens ’N Things (2014), Sports Authority (2018), PetsMart (2020), Lowe’s (Not Owned)
42     160,135     $ 741,232     $ 7.13       64.9 %   Beall’s (2012), Beall’s Outlet (2006)
43     76,087     $ 882,108     $ 12.66       91.6 %   Marshall’s of MA, Inc. (2010)
 
44     46,835     $ 446,281     $ 9.72       98.1 %   Kash N’ Karry (2011)
 
45     16,000     $ 136,600     $ 8.54       100 %    
 
46     29,827     $ 477,586     $ 16.01       100 %   Lowe’s (Not Owned), Wal- Mart (Not Owned)
47     219,735     $ 1,275,869     $ 6.53       88.9 %   J.C. Penney (2007),Winn Dixie Stores (2009)
48     182,098     $ 994,358     $ 6.64       82.3 %   Food Lion (2010)
 
49     102,572     $ 797,879     $ 8.33       93.4 %   Winn-Dixie (2017)
 
50     106,224     $ 1,385,561     $ 13.51       96.6 %   Publix Super Markets (2006)
 
51     63,894     $ 260,468     $ 4.26       95.6 %   Beall’s (2005), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
52     41,733     $ 170,265     $ 4.29       95.2 %    
 
53     267,808     $ 3,000,483     $ 11.53       97.2 %   Winn Dixie (2014), T.J Maxx (2009), Circuit City (2015), Ross Dress For Less (2010), Circuit City (2015), OfficeMax (2010)
54     101,438     $ 422,114     $ 9.00       46.3 %   Sports Authority (2012)
 
55     72,531     $ 674,457     $ 9.30       100 %   Beall’s Dept Store (2009), Albertson’s (Not owned)
56     234,045     $ 1,712,355     $ 8.72       83.9 %   Beall’s (2018), Publix Super Markets (2013)

22


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








57   Oviedo, FL   Oviedo Park Crossing
Rte 417 & Red Bug Lake Road
    32765       SC       Fee (3)     1999       1*       20 %
58   Palm Harbor, FL   The Shoppes Of Boot Ranch
300 East Lakeroad
    34685       SC       Fee       1990       1995       100 %
59   Pensacola, FL   Palafox Square
8934 Pensacola Blvd
    32534       SC       Fee       1988       1*       100 %
60   Spring Hill, FL   Mariner Square
13050 Cortez Blvd.
    34613       SC       Fee       1988       2*       100 %
61   Tallahassee, FL   Capital West
4330 West Tennessee Street
    32312       SC       Fee       1994       2003       100 %
62   Tampa, FL (Dale)   North Pointe Plaza
15001-15233 North Dale Mabry
    33618       SC       Fee (3)     1990       2*       20 %
63   Tampa, FL (Horizon Park)   Horizon Park Shopping Center
3908 West Hillsborough Highway
    33614       SC       Fee       1987       2004       100 %
64   Tampa, FL (Waters)   Town N’ Country
7021-7091 West Waters Avenue
    33634       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
65   Tarpon Springs, FL   Tarpon Square
41232 U.S. 19, North
    34689       SC       Fee       1974       2*       100 %
66   West Pasco, FL   Pasco Square
7201 County Road 54
    34653       SC       Fee       1986       2*       100 %
    Georgia                                                    
   
                                                   
67   Athens, GA   Athens East
4375 Lexington Road
    30605       SC       Fee       2000       2003       100 %
68
  Atlanta, GA (Duluth)   Pleasant Hill Plaza
1630 Pleasant Hill Road
    30136       SC       Fee       1990       1994       100 %
69
  Atlanta, GA (Perimeter)   Perimeter Pointe
1155 Mt. Vernon Highway
    30136       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1995       14.5 %
70
  Canton, GA (Riverplace)   Riverplace
104-150 Riverstone Parkway
    30114       SC       Fee       1983       2003       100 %
71
  Cartersville, GA   Felton’s Crossing
877 Joe Frank Harris Parkway S
    30120       SC       Fee       1984       2003       100 %
72
  Chamblee, GA   Chamblee Plaza
Peachtree Industrial Boulevard
    30341       SC       Fee       1976       2003       100 %
73
  Columbus, GA   Bradley Park Crossing
1591 Bradley Park Drive Columb
    31904       SC       Fee       1999       2003       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





57     186,212     $ 1,947,403     $ 10.46       100 %   OfficeMax (2014), Ross Dress For Less (2010), Michaels (2009), T.J. Maxx (2010), Linens ’N Things (2011), Lowe’s (Not Owned)
58     52,395     $ 890,277     $ 17.34       98 %   Albertson’s (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned)
59     17,150     $ 203,840     $ 13.82       86 %   Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
 
60     188,924     $ 1,531,111     $ 8.02       97.8 %   Beall’s (2006), Ross Dress For Less (2014), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
61     53,883     $ 323,154     $ 6.92       86.6 %   Beall’s Outlet (2009), Wal- Mart (Not Owned)
62     104,460     $ 1,179,528     $ 11.94       94.6 %   Publix Super Markets (2010), Wal- Mart (Not Owned)
63     216,284     $ 1,548,168     $ 8.82       81.2 %   Home Depot (2009), Pearl Artist & Craft Supply (2007)
64     134,366     $ 1,080,064     $ 8.53       94.2 %   Beall’s (2005), Kash ’N Karry-2 Store (2010), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
65     198,797     $ 1,399,072     $ 7.04       100 %   K-Mart (2009), Big Lots (2007), Staples Superstore (2013)
66     135,421     $ 884,744     $ 7.23       90.4 %   Beall’s Outlet (2013), Publix Super Markets (2006), Plymouth Blimpie, Inc. (2006), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
 
67     24,000     $ 327,600     $ 14.37       95 %   Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
 
68
    99,025     $ 1,045,776     $ 11.12       95 %   Office Depot (2005), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
69
    343,155     $ 5,291,902     $ 14.71       99.8 %   Stein Mart (2010), Babies R Us, (2007), Sports Authority (2012), L.A. Fitness Sports Clubs (2016), Office Depot (2012), St. Joseph’s Hospital/ Atlanta (2006), United Artists Theatre (2015)
70
    127,853     $ 909,925     $ 7.42       96 %   Staples (2014), Ingles (2019)
 
71
    112,240     $ 872,716     $ 7.78       100 %   Ross Dress For Less (2013), Ingles (2019)
72
    175,969     $ 1,262,621     $ 9.48       75.7 %   Save Rite (2006)
 
73
    119,786     $ 1,114,073     $ 10.36       89.8 %   Goody’s (2011), PetsMart (2015), Michaels (2009), Target (Not Owned)

23


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








74
  Cumming, GA   Cumming Marketplace
Marketplace Boulevard
    30041       SC       Fee       1997       2003       100 %
75
  Douglasville, GA   Douglasville Marketplace
6875 Douglas Boulevard
    30135       SC       Fee       1999       2003       100 %
76
  Ft. Oglethorpe, GA   Fort Oglethorpe Marketplace
101 Battlefield Parkway Fort
    30742       SC       Fee       1992       2003       100 %
77
  Griffin, GA   Ellis Crossing
649-687 North Expressway
    30223       SC       Fee       1986       2003       100 %
78
  Lafayette, GA   Lafayette Center
1109 North Main Street
    30728       SC       Fee       1990       2003       100 %
79
  Lawrenceville, GA   Five Forks Village
850 Dogwood Road
    30044       SC       Fee (3)     1990       2003       10 %
80
  Lilburn, GA (Five Forks)   Five Forks Crossing
3055 Five Forks Trickum Road
    30047       SC       Fee (3)     2000       2003       10 %
81
  Lithonia, GA   The Shoppes at Turner Hill
8200 Mall Parkway
    30038       SC       Fee       2004       2003       100 %
82
  Loganville, GA   Midway Plaza
910 Athens Hwy
    30052       SC       Fee (3)     1995       2003       20 %
83
  Madison, GA   Beacon Heights
1462-1532 Eatonton Road
    30650       SC       Fee       1989       2003       100 %
84
  Marietta, GA   Town Center Prado
2609 Bells Ferry Road
    30066       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1995       14.5 %
85
  McDonough, GA   McDonough Marketplace (LP-II)
NE Corner 175 & Highway 20
    30253       SC       Fee       2003       2003       100 %
86
  Newnan, GA   Newnan Crossing
955-1063 Bullsboro Drive Newna
    30264       SC       Fee       1995       2003       100 %
87
  Stockbridge, GA (Freeway)   Freeway Junction
3797-3879 Highway 138 SE Stock
    30281       SC       Fee       1988       2003       100 %
88
  Stockbridge, GA (Pike)   Pike Nurseries-Stockbridge
599 Highway 138W
    30281       SC       Fee       1997       2003       100 %
89
  Stone Mountain, GA (River)   Rivercliff Village
Stone Mountain Highway Stone M
    30047       SC       Fee       1999       2003       100 %
90
  Suwanee, GA (Johns)   Johns Creek Towne Center
3630 Peachtree Parkway Suwanee
    30024       SC       Fee       2001       2003       100 %
91
  Tucker, GA   Cofer Crossing
4349-4375 Lawrenceville Hwy
    30084       SC       Fee       1998       2003       100 %
92
  Union City, GA   Shannon Square
4720 Jonesboro Road
    30291       SC       Fee       1986       2003       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





74
    308,557     $ 3,681,499     $ 11.47       100 %   Goody’s (2012), Lowe’s (2019), Michaels (2010), OfficeMax (2013), Home Depot (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
75
    86,158     $ 1,321,415     $ 9.82       97.8 %   Best Buy (2015), Babies R Us (2006), Lowe’s (Not Owned)
76
    176,903     $ 461,270     $ 3.72       70.1 %   K-Mart (2007)
 
77
    64,770     $ 243,500     $ 5.60       67.1 %   Winn-Dixie (2006), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
78
    75,622     $ 490,565     $ 6.55       95.4 %   Farmers Furniture (2009), Food Lion (2019)
79
    89,064     $ 944,136     $ 10.75       98.7 %   Winn-Dixie (Save-Rite) (2010)
 
80
    73,950     $ 673,041     $ 9.28       98 %   Kroger (2012)
 
81
    87,575     $ 1,178,584     $ 11.79       99.1 %   Best Buy (2018), Bed Bath & Beyond (2012), Toys R Us (Not Owned), Sam’s Club (Not Owned)
82
    91,196     $ 956,900     $ 10.83       96.9 %   Kroger (2016)
 
83
    105,849     $ 491,834     $ 4.77       97.4 %   Ingles (Dark) (2010), Wal- Mart (2009)
84
    301,297     $ 3,798,464     $ 12.66       98.2 %   Stein Mart (2007), Ross Dress For Less (2013), Publix Super Markets (2015), Crunch Fitness International (2011)
85
    30,500     $ 565,883     $ 14.46       100 %   Lowe’s (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
86
    156,497     $ 1,290,340     $ 8.14       100 %   Lowe’s (2015), Belk (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
87
    162,778     $ 262,996     $ 4.33       37.4 %   Ingles (2009)
 
88
    0     $ 244,145     $ 0.00       100 %    
 
89
    2,000     $ 42,000     $ 21.00       100 %    
 
90
    233,319     $ 2,876,835     $ 13.02       94.7 %   Kohl’s (2022), Michaels (2011), Staples (2016), Shoe Gallery (2014)
91
    130,832     $ 1,257,637     $ 9.08       100 %   Goody’s (2014), Kroger (2019), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
92
    100,002     $ 776,527     $ 8.23       94.4 %   Ingles (2056), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)

24


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








93
  Warner Robbins, GA   Warner Robins Place
2724 Watson Boulevard
    31093       SC       Fee       1997       2003       100 %
94
  Woodstock, GA   Woodstock Place
10029 Highway 928
    30188       SC       GL       1995       2003       100 %
    Idaho                                                    
95
  Idaho Falls, ID   Country Club Mall
1515 Northgate Mile
    83401       SC       Fee       1976       1998       100 %
96
  Meridian, ID   Meridian Crossroads
Eagle and Fairview Road
    83642       SC       Fee       1999       1*       100 %
    Illinois                                                    
97
  Decatur, IL   Decatur Marketplace
Maryland Street
    62521       SC       Fee       1999       2003       100 %
98
  Deer Park, IL   Deer Park Town Center
20530 North Rand Rd #303
    60010       LC       Fee (3)     2000       1*       24.75 %
99
  Harrisburg, IL   Arrowhead Point
701 North Commercial
    62946       SC       Fee       1991       1994       100 %
100
  Kildeer, IL   The Shops at Kildeer
20505 North Highway 12
    60047       SC       Fee (3)     2001       2001       10 %
101
  Mount Vernon, IL   Times Square Mall
42nd and Broadway
    62864       MM       Fee       1974       2*       100 %
102
  Orland Park, IL (Home Depot)   Home Depot Center
15800 Harlem Avenue
    60462       SC       Fee       1987       2004       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





93
    107,941     $ 1,227,606     $ 10.92       97.8 %   T.J. Maxx (2010), Staples (2016), Lowe’s (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
94
    170,940     $ 1,437,076     $ 8.62       97.5 %   Wal-Mart (2020)
95
    148,593     $ 723,797     $ 6.64       73.4 %   OfficeMax (2011), World Gym (2008), Fred Meyer, Inc. (Not Owned)
96
    453,719     $ 5,763,756     $ 11.50       100 %   Bed Bath & Beyond (2011), Old Navy (2005), Shopko Stores, Inc. (2020), Office Depot (2010), Ross Dress For Less (2012), Marshall’s (2012), Sportsman’s Warehouse (2015), Craft Warehouse (2013), Babies R Us (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
97
    22,775     $ 263,706     $ 12.22       94.7 %   Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
98
    285,468     $ 8,359,039     $ 27.55       97 %   Gap (2010), Barnes & Noble (Not Owned), Pier 1 Imports (2012), Banana Republic (2010), Bombay Company (2011), Abercrombie & Fitch (2005), Pottery Barn Kids (2012), Pottery Barn (2013), Restoration Hardware (2010), Eddie Bauer Home (2011), Eddie Bauer Sportswear (2011), Coldwater Creek (2010), J. Crew (2011), Ann Taylor (2011), Talbots/ Talbots Petites (2011), Williams-Sonoma (2013), Joseph A. Bank Clothiers (2011), California Pizza Kitchen (2013), Bath and Body Works (2011), J. Jill (2013)
99
    167,074     $ 845,213     $ 5.42       93.3 %   Wal-Mart (2011), Mad-Pricer Store/ Roundy’s (2011)
100
    161,770     $ 3,141,729     $ 18.74       100 %   Bed Bath & Beyond (2012), Circuit City (2017), Old Navy (2006)
101
    269,328     $ 843,615     $ 4.08       71.8 %   Sears (2013), J.C. Penney (2007)
102
    149,498     $ 1,382,359     $ 9.77       94.6 %   Home Depot (2012)

25


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








103
  Schaumburg, IL   Woodfield Village Green
1430 East Golf Road
    60173       SC       Fee (3)     1993       1995       14.5 %
    Indiana                                                    
104
  Bedford, IN   Town Fair Center
1320 James Avenue
    47421       SC       Fee       1993       2*       100 %
105
  Connersville, IN   Whitewater Trade Center
2100 Park Road
    47331       SC       Fee       1991       2*       100 %
106
  Highland, IN   Highland Grove Shopping Center
Highway 41 & Main Street
    46322       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1996       20 %
107
  Lafayette, IN   Park East Marketplace
4205-4315 Commerce Drive
    47905       SC       Fee       2000       2003       100 %
    Iowa                                                    
108
  Cedar Rapids, IA   Northland Square
303-367 Collins Road, NE
    52404       SC       Fee       1984       1998       100 %
109
  Ottumwa, IA   Quincy Place Mall
1110 Quincy Avenue
    52501       MM       Fee       1990       2*       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





103
    459,354     $ 8,210,381     $ 17.11       100 %   Circuit City (2009), Off 5th (2011), OfficeMax (2010), Container Store (2011), Filene’s Basement (2014), Marshall’s (2009), Nordstrom Rack (2009), Borders Books (2009), Expo Design Center (2019), Prairie Rock Restaurant (Not Owned), Costco(Not Owned), KLA/SM Newco Schaumburg, LLC (Not Owned)
104
    223,431     $ 1,324,889     $ 5.93       100 %   K-Mart (2008), Goody’s (2008), J.C. Penney (2008), Buehler’s Buy Low (2010)
105
    141,770     $ 858,083     $ 6.14       98.6 %   Cox New Market (2011), Wal- Mart (2011)
106
    312,546     $ 3,284,677     $ 10.58       99.3 %   Marshall’s (2011), Kohl’s (2016), Circuit City (2016), Office Max (2012), Target (Not Owned), Jewel (Not Owned), Borders (Not Owned)
107
    35,100     $ 412,572     $ 13.84       84.9 %   Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
 
108
    187,068     $ 1,772,537     $ 9.48       100 %   T.J. Maxx (2010), OfficeMax (2010), Barnes & Noble (2010), Kohl’s (2021)
109
    229,427     $ 1,414,251     $ 6.46       95.5 %   Herberger’s (2020), J.C. Penney (2010), Goody’s (2014), OfficeMax (2015), Target (Not Owned)

26


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








    Kansas                                                    
110
  Leawood, KS   Town Center Plaza
5000 W 119 Street
    66209       LC       Fee       1996       1998       100 %
111
  Merriam, KS   Merriam Town Center
5700 Antioch Road
    66202       SC       Fee (3)     1998       1*       14.5 %
112
  Olathe, KS (Devonshire)   Devonshire Village
127th Street & Mur-Len Road
    66062       SC       Fee (3)     1987       1998       24.75 %
113
  Overland Park, KS (Cherokee)   Cherokee North Shopping Center
8800-8934 W 95th Street
    66212       SC       Fee (3)     1987       1998       24.75 %
114
  Overland Park, KS (Pointe)   Overland Pointe Marketplace
Inter 135th & Antioch Rd
    66213       SC       Fee       2001       2003       100 %
115
  Shawnee, KS (Quivira Parcel)   Ten Quivira Parcel
63rd St. & Quivira Road
    66216       SC       Fee (3)     1972       1998       24.75 %
116
  Shawnee, KS (Ten Quivira)   Ten Quivira Shopping Center
63rd Street & Quivira Road
    66216       SC       Fee (3)     1999       1998       24.75 %
117
  Wichita, KS (Eastgate)   Eastgate Plaza
South Rock Road
    67207       SC       Fee       1955       2002       100 %
    Kentucky                                                    
118
  Florence, KY (Turfway)   Turfway Plaza
6825 Turfway Road
    41042       SC       Fee       1975       2004       100 %
119
  Frankfurt, KY (Eastwood)   Eastwood Shopping Center
260 Versailles Road
    40601       SC       Fee       1963       2004       100 %
120
  Lexington, KY (North)   North Park Marketplace
524 West New Circle
    40511       SC       Fee       1998       2003       100 %
121
  Lexington, KY (South)   South Farm Marketplace
Man-O-War Boulevard and Nichol
    40503       SC       Fee       1998       2003       100 %
122
  Louisville, KY (Outer Loop)   Outer Loop Plaza
7505 Outer Loop Highway
    40228       SC       Fee       1973       2004       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





110
    412,516     $ 7,008,246     $ 17.11       97.5 %   Barnes & Noble (2011), Coldwater Creek (2009), Limited/ Limited Too (2009), Abercrombie & Fitch (2009), Victoria’s Secret (2009), Express/ Bath&Body/ Structure (2009), Gap/Gap Body (2008), Gap Kids (2005), J. Jill (2013), Pottery Barn (2009), Williams-Sonoma (2009), American Eagle (2013), Pacific Sunwear (2012), Bravo Cucina Italiana (2013), Restoration Hardware (2012), Houlihan’s, Bristol Seafood Bar & Grill (2011), Bombay (2006)
111
    345,736     $ 4,039,426     $ 11.80       99 %   OfficeMax (2013), PetsMart (2019), Hen House (2018), Marshall’s (2008), Dick’s Sporting Goods (2016), Cinemark (2018), Home Depot (Not Owned)
112
    48,802     $ 383,384     $ 9.67       81.2 %    
113
    60,765     $ 735,119     $ 13.83       86.4 %    
114
    14,000     $ 269,122     $ 19.22       100 %    
115
    12,000     $ 206,911     $ 17.24       100 %    
116
    162,843     $ 930,355     $ 6.24       87.6 %   Price Chopper Foods (2008), Westlake Hardware (2005)
117
    203,997     $ 2,134,012     $ 11.85       89.2 %   OfficeMax (2007), T.J. Maxx (2006), Barnes & Noble (2012), KCBB, Inc Burlington (Not Owned)
118
    133,985     $ 849,332     $ 6.69       94.8 %   Party Town & Office Depot (2006), Big Lots, Inc. (2008)
119
    155,104     $ 578,877     $ 3.99       93.5 %   Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2006)
120
    48,920     $ 620,220     $ 13.71       92.5 %   Staples (2016), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
121
    27,643     $ 584,832     $ 21.16       100 %   Lowe’s (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
122
    120,477     $ 617,385     $ 5.68       90.2 %   Valu Discount, Inc. (2009)

27


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








123
  Richmond, KY   Carriage Gate
833-847 Eastern By-Pass
    40475       SC       Fee       1992       2003       100 %
    Maine                                                    
124
  Brunswick, ME   Cook’s Corners
172 Bath Road
    04011       SC       GL       1965       1997       100 %
    Maryland                                                    
125
  Salisbury, MD   The Commons
E. North Point Drive
    21801       SC       Fee       1999       1*       100 %
126
  Salisbury, MD (Dev JV)   The Commons (Phase III)
North Pointe Drive
    21801       SC       Fee (3)     2000       1*       50 %
    Massachusetts                                                    
127
  Everett, MA   Gateway Center
1 Mystic View Road
    02149       SC       Fee       2001       1*       100 %
128
  Framingham, MA   Shopper’s World
1 Worcester Road
    01701       SC       Fee (3)     1994       1995       14.5 %
    Michigan                                                    
129
  Bad Axe, MI   Huron Crest Plaza
850 North Van Dyke Road
    48413       SC       Fee       1991       2*       100 %
130
  Cheboygan, MI   K-mart Shopping Plaza
1109 East State
    49721       SC       Fee       1988       2*       100 %
131
  Detroit, MI   Belair Center
8400 E. Eight Mile Road
    48234       SC       GL       1989       1998       100 %
132
  Gaylord, MI   Pine Ridge Square
1401 West Main Street
    49735       SC       Fee       1991       2*       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





123
    158,041     $ 376,059     $ 7.67       31 %   Food Lion (2017), Ballard’s (Not Owned)
124
    301,992     $ 2,513,314     $ 8.08       99 %   Hoyts Cinemas Brunswik (2010), Brunswick Bookland (2014), Big Lots (2008), T.J. Maxx (2010), Sears (2012)
125
    98,635     $ 1,360,468     $ 13.08       100 %   OfficeMax (2013), Michaels (2009), Home Depot (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned)
126
    27,500     $ 243,250     $ 11.87       74.5 %    
 
127
    222,287     $ 4,364,862     $ 15.54       100 %   Bed Bath and Beyond (2011), Old Navy (2011), OfficeMax (2020), Babies R Us (2013), Michaels (2012), Costco (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned), Home Depot (Not Owned)
128
    769,276     $ 13,463,395     $ 17.48       98.6 %   Toys R Us (2020), Jordon Marsh/ Federated (2020), T.J. Maxx (2010), Babies R Us (2013), DSW Shoe Warehouse (2007), A.C. Moore (2007), Marshall’s (2011), Bob’s (2011), Linens ’N Things (2011), Sports Authority (2015), OfficeMax (2011), Best Buy (2014), Barnes & Noble (2011), Kohl’s (2010), General Cinema (2014)
129
    63,415     $ 500,308     $ 7.89       100 %   Great A & P Tea (2012), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
130
    95,094     $ 203,776     $ 3.80       56.4 %   K-Mart (2010), K-Mart (Not Owned)
 
131
    343,502     $ 2,137,094     $ 8.28       75.8 %   Phoenix Theaters (2011), Bally Total Fitness (2016), Big Lots Stores, Inc. (2008), Kids R Us (2013), Toys R Us, Inc. (2011), Target (Not Owned)
132
    190,482     $ 692,333     $ 6.16       59 %   Big Lots (2010), Buy Low/Roundy’s (2011)

28


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








133
  Grandville, MI   Grandville Marketplace
Intersect 44th St & Canal Ave
    49418       SC       Fee       2003       2003       100 %
134
  Houghton, MI   Copper Country Mall
Highway M26
    49931       MM       Fee       1981       2*       100 %
135
  Howell, MI   Grand River Plaza
3599 East Grand River
    48843       SC       Fee       1991       2*       100 %
136
  Lansing, MI   The Marketplace at Delta Towns
8305 West Saginaw Hwy 196 Ramp
    48917       SC       Fee       2000       2003       100 %
137
  Mt. Pleasant, MI   Indian Hills Plaza
4208 E Blue Grass Road
    48858       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
138
  Sault St. Marie, MI   Cascade Crossings
4516 I-75 Business Spur
    49783       SC       Fee       1993       1994       100 %
139
  Walker, MI (Alpine Ave)   Green Ridge Square II
3410 Alpine Avenue
    49504       SC       Fee       1991       2004       100 %
140
  Walker, MI (Grand Rapids)   Green Ridge Square
3390-B Alpine Ave NW
    49504       SC       Fee       1989       1995       100 %
    Minnesota                                                    
   
                                                   
141
  Bemidji, MN   Paul Bunyan Mall
1201 Paul Bunyan Drive
    56601       MM       Fee       1977       2*       100 %
142
  Brainerd, MN   Westgate Mall
1200 Highway 210 West
    56401       MM       Fee       1985       2*       100 %
143
  Coon Rapids, MN   Riverdale Village Perimeter
12921 Riverdale Drive
    55433       SC       Fee (3)     1999       1*       14.5 %
144
  Coon Rapids, MN (Inner)   Riverdale Village - Inner
12921 Riverdale Drive
    55433       SC       Fee (3)     2003       1*       14.5 %
145
  Eagan, MN   Eagan Promenade
1299 Promenade Place
    55122       SC       Fee (3)     1997       1997       50 %
146
  Hutchinson, MN   Hutchinson Mall
1060 SR 15
    55350       MM       Fee       1981       *2       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





133
    196,543     $ 2,432,777     $ 12.04       98.7 %   Circuit City (2017), Linens ’N Things (2013), Gander Mountain (2016), OfficeMax (2013), Lowe’s (Not Owned)
134
    257,863     $ 698,098     $ 4.92       55 %   J.C. Penney (2010), OfficeMax (2014)
135
    215,047     $ 1,393,655     $ 6.53       99.3 %   Elder-Beerman (2011), Dunham’s Sporting Goods (2011), Kroger (2012)
136
    95,369     $ 960,941     $ 10.54       95.6 %   Michaels (2011), Gander Mountain (2015), Lowe’s (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
137
    249,680     $ 1,659,484     $ 6.70       99.2 %   Wal-Mart (2009), TJX (2014), Kroger (2011)
138
    270,761     $ 1,651,724     $ 6.45       94.5 %   Wal-Mart (2012), J.C. Penney (2008), OfficeMax (2013), Glen’s Market (2013)
139
    88,133     $ 902,807     $ 10.24       100 %   Circuit City (2003), Bed Bath and Beyond (2015)
140
    133,877     $ 1,318,282     $ 11.08       88.9 %   T.J. Maxx (2005), Office Depot (2010), Bed Bath and Beyond (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned), Toys R Us (Not Owned)
 
141
    297,803     $ 1,478,160     $ 5.19       95.6 %   K-Mart (2007), Herberger’s (2005), J.C. Penney (2008)
142
    260,319     $ 1,754,569     $ 9.13       73.8 %   Herberger’s (2013), Movies 10/ Westgate Mall (2011)
143
    364,998     $ 5,262,237     $ 13.11       99.7 %   Kohl’s (2020), Jo-Ann Stores (2010), Linens ’N Things (2016), Old Navy (2007), Sportsmen’s Warehouse (2017), Best Buy Stores, L.P. (2013), Sears (Not Owned), Costco (Not Owned)
144
    153,263     $ 3,402,206     $ 18.23       100 %   Borders (2023), J.C. Penney (Not Owned)
145
    278,211     $ 3,446,110     $ 12.60       98.3 %   Byerly’s (2016), PetsMart (2018), Barnes & Noble (2012), OfficeMax (2013), T.J. Maxx (2007), Bed Bath & Beyond (2012), Ethan Allen Furniture (Not Owned)
146
    121,001     $ 637,348     $ 6.06       81.1 %   J.C. Penney (2006), Hennen’s Furniture (Not Owned)

29


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








147
  Minneapolis, MN (Maple Grove)   Maple Grove Crossing
Weaver Lake Road & I-94
    55369       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1996       50 %
148
  St. Paul, MN   Midway Marketplace
1450 University Avenue West
    55104       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1997       14.5 %
149
  Worthington, MN   Northland Mall
1635 Oxford Street
    56187       MM       Fee       1977       2*       100 %
    Mississippi                                                    
150
  Gulfport, MS   Crossroads Center
Crossroads Parway
    39503       SC       GL       1999       2003       100 %
151
  Jackson, MS (Junction)   The Junction
6351 I-55 North3
    39213       SC       Fee       1996       2003       100 %
152
  Jackson, MS (Metro)   Metro Station
4700 Robinson Road
    39204       SC       Fee       1997       2003       100 %
153
  Oxford, MS   Oxford Place
2015-2035 University Avenue
    38655       SC       Fee (3)     2000       2003       20 %
154
  Saltillo, MS   Cross Creek Shopping Center
1040-1184 Cross Creek Drive
    38866       SC       Fee       1999       2003       100 %
155
  Starkville, MS   Starkville Crossing
882 Highway 12 West
    39759       SC       Fee       1999       1994       100 %
156
  Tupelo, MS   Big Oaks Crossing
3850 N Gloster St
    38801       SC       Fee       1992       1994       100 %
    Missouri                                                    
157
  Arnold, MO   Jefferson County Plaza
Vogel Road
    63010       SC       Fee (3)     2002       1*       50 %
158
  Fenton, MO   Fenton Plaza
Gravois & Highway 141
    63206       SC       Fee       1970       2*       100 %
159
  Independence, MO   Independence Commons
900 East 39th Street
    64057       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1995       14.5 %
160
  Kansas City, MO (Brywood)   Brywood Center
8600 E. 63rd Street
    64133       SC       Fee (3)     1972       1998       24.75 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





147
    265,957     $ 2,837,043     $ 10.67       100 %   Kohl’s (2016), Barnes & Noble (2011), Gander Mountain(2011), Michaels Stores, Inc. (2012), Bed Bath and Beyond (2012), Cub Foods (Not Owned)
148
    324,354     $ 2,639,627     $ 8.14       100 %   Wal-Mart (2022), Cub Foods (2015), PetsMart (2011), Mervyn’s (2016), Borders Books and Music (Not Owned), Herberger’s (Not Owned)
149
    185,658     $ 526,753     $ 4.90       57.9 %   J.C. Penney (2007), Hy-Vee Food Stores (2011)
150
    457,027     $ 5,177,175     $ 10.91       98.6 %   Academy (2015), Bed Bath and Beyond (2014), Ross Dress For Less (2015), Goody’s Family Clothing (2011), T.J. Maxx (2009), TinselTown (2019), Office Depot (2014), Barnes & Noble (2014), Belk’s (Not Owned)
151
    107,780     $ 1,082,769     $ 10.27       97.8 %   PetsMart (2012), Office Depot (2016), Home Depot (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned)
152
    52,617     $ 331,788     $ 7.99       78.9 %   Office Depot (2012), Home Depot (Not Owned)
153
    13,200     $ 319,580     $ 12.70       100 %    
 
154
    55,749     $ 576,127     $ 9.82       93.6 %   Staples (2016), Home Depot (Not Owned)
155
    133,691     $ 895,928     $ 6.70       100 %   J.C. Penney (2010), Kroger (2042), Lowe’s (Not Owned)
156
    348,236     $ 1,923,088     $ 5.62       98.2 %   Sam’s Club (2012), Goody’s (2007), Wal-Mart (2012)
157
    34,567     $ 463,364     $ 13.40       100 %   Home Depot (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned)
158
    93,548     $ 848,808     $ 10.29       87.3 %    
 
159
    385,955     $ 4,564,531     $ 11.83       100 %   Kohl’s Department (2016), Bed Bath & Beyond (2012), Marshall’s (2012), Rhodes Furniture, Inc. (2016), Barnes & Noble (2011), AMC Theatre (2015)
160
    208,234     $ 892,469     $ 5.35       80.2 %   Big Lots (2009), Price Chopper (2009)

30


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








161
  Kansas City, MO (Ward Parkway)   Ward Parkway
8600 Ward Parkway
    64114       SC       Fee (3)     1959       2003       20 %
162
  Springfield, MO (Morris)   Morris Corners
1425 East Battlefield
    65804       SC       GL       1989       1998       100 %
163
  St. John, MO   St. John Crossings
9000-9070 St. Charles Rock Road
    63114       SC       Fee       2003       2003       100 %
164
  St. Louis (Sunset), MO   Plaza at Sunset Hill
10980 Sunset Plaza
    63128       SC       Fee       1997       1998       100 %
165
  St. Louis, MO (Keller Plaza)   Keller Plaza
4500 Lemay Ferry Road
    63129       SC       Fee       1987       1998       100 %
166
  St. Louis, MO (Southtowne)   Southtowne
Kings Highway & Chippewa
    63109       SC       Fee       2004       1998       100 %
167
  St. Louis, MO (Brentwood)   Promenade at Brentwood
1 Brentwood Promenade Court
    63144       SC       Fee       1998       1998       100 %
168
  St. Louis, MO (Gravois Village)   Gravois Village
4523 Gravois Village Plaza
    63049       SC       Fee       1983       1998       100 %
169
  St. Louis, MO (Olympic Oaks)   Olympic Oaks Village
12109 Manchester Road
    63121       SC       Fee       1985       1998       100 %
    Nevada                                                    
170
  Las Vegas, NV (Maryland)   Family Place @ Las Vegas
Charleston & Maryland Blvd
    89102       SC       Fee       2003       1*       100 %
171
  Reno, NV   Reno Riverside
East First Street and Sierra
    89505       SC       Fee       2000       2000       100 %
    New Jersey                                                    
172
  Hamilton, NJ   Hamilton Marketplace
NJ State Hwy 130 & Klockner Rd
    08691       SC       Fee       2004       2003       100 %
173
  Mays Landing, NJ (Hamilton)   Hamilton Commons
4215 Black Horse Pike
    08330       SC       Fee       2001       2004       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





161
    229,284     $ 4,166,147     $ 15.23       100 %   AMC Theaters (2011), T.J. Maxx (2013), Dick’s (2016), 24 Hour Fitness (2023), Target (Not Owned), Dillard’s (Not Owned)
162
    56,033     $ 486,741     $ 8.69       100 %   Toys R Us (2013)
 
163
    93,513     $ 956,025     $ 11.34       90.1 %   Shop ’N Save (2022)
 
164
    415,435     $ 5,305,336     $ 11.71       99.7 %   Bed Bath and Beyond (2012), Marshall’s of Sunset Hills (2012), Home Depot (2023), PetsMart (2012), Borders (2011), Toys R Us (2013), CompUSA Computer Super (2013)
165
    52,842     $ 466,784     $ 5.75       100 %   Sensible Cinemas, Inc (2006), Sam’s Club (Not Owned)
166
    60,628     $ 930,858     $ 15.35       100 %   OfficeMax (2014)
 
167
    299,584     $ 4,022,889     $ 13.43       100 %   Target (2023), Bed Bath & Beyond (2009), PetsMart (2014), Sports Authority (2013)
168
    110,992     $ 611,499     $ 5.47       94.8 %   K-Mart (2008)
 
169
    92,372     $ 1,390,809     $ 15.59       96.6 %   T.J. Maxx (2006)
 
170
    24,032     $ 428,856     $ 14.85       100 %    
 
171
    52,474     $ 32,776     $ 0.62       100 %   Century Theatre, Inc. (2014)
 
172
    420,368     $ 6,801,924     $ 14.83       99.7 %   Kohl’s (2023), Linens ’N Things (2014), Michaels (2013), Ross Dress For Less (2014), Shop Rite (2028), Barnes & Noble (2014), Lowe’s (Not Owned), BJ’s Wholesale (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
173
    400,160     $ 5,661,550     $ 14.95       94.6 %   Regal Cinemas (2021), Ross Stores (2012), Bed Bath and Beyond (2017), Marshall’s (2012), Sports Authority (2015), Circuit City (2020)

31


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








174
  Mays Landing, NJ (Wrangleboro)   Wrangleboro Consumer Square
2300 Wrangleboro Road
    08330       SC       Fee       1997       2004       100 %
175
  Princeton, NJ   Nassau Park Shopping Center
Route 1 & Quaker Bridge Road
    42071       SC       Fee       1995       1997       100 %
176
  Princeton, NJ (Pavilion)   Nassau Park Pavilion
Route 1 and Quaker Bridge Road
    42071       SC       Fee       1999       1*       100 %
177
  West Long Branch, NJ (Monmouth)   Consumer Centre
310 State Highway #36
    07764       SC       Fee       1993       2004       100 %
    New Mexico                                                    
178
  Los Alamos, NM   Mari Mac Village
800 Trinity Drive
    87533       SC       Fee       1978       2*       100 %
    New York                                                    
179
  Alden, NY (Tops)   Tops Plaza-Alden
12775 Broadway
    14004       SC       Fee       1999       2004       100 %
180
  Amherst, NY   Tops Plaza (Robinson)
3035 Niagara Falls Blvd
    14228       SC       Fee (3)     1986       2004       20 %
181
  Amherst, NY (Boulevard Consumer)   K-Mart-Amherst Niagara
1641-1703 Niagara Falls Blvd
    14228       SC       Fee       1998       2004       100 %
182
  Amherst, NY (Burlington/ Jo-Ann)   Burlington Plaza
1551 Niagara Falls Boulevard
    14228       SC       GL       1978       2004       100 %
183
  Amherst, NY (Dicks)   Dick’s Sporting Goods-Amherst
281 Meyer Road
    14226       SC       Fee       1993       2004       100 %
184
  Amherst, NY (Sheridan/ Harlem)   Sheridan Harlem Plaza
4990 Harlem Road
    14226       SC       Fee       1960       2004       100 %
185
  Amherst, NY (Tops-Transit Comm)   Tops Plaza-Amherst Transit
9660 Transit Road
    14226       SC       Fee       1995       2004       100 %
186
  Amherst, NY (University Plaza)   University Plaza
3500 Main Street
    14226       SC       GL       1965       2004       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





174
    839,446     $ 9,433,808     $ 11.51       97.6 %   Best Buy Stores, L.P. (2017), Kohl’s Stores (2018), Staples (2012), Babies R Us (2013), BJ’s Wholesale Club (2016), Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc (2013), Seamans Furniture (2012), Linens ’N Things (2012), Michaels (2008), Target Stores (2023), PetsMart (2013), Borders (2017)
175
    211,807     $ 3,806,990     $ 19.47       92.3 %   Borders (2011), Best Buy (2012), Linens ’N Things (2011), PetsMart (2011), Wal-Mart (Not Owned), Sam’s Club (Not Owned), Home Depot (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned)
176
    202,622     $ 4,001,229     $ 15.40       100 %   Dick’s Sporting Good (2015), Michaels (2009), Kohl’s (2019), Wegman’s Market (Not Owned)
177
    292,999     $ 3,889,010     $ 13.44       98.7 %   Sports Authority (2012), Barnes & Noble (2009), PetsMart (2008), Home Depot (2013)
178
    93,021     $ 597,947     $ 6.63       96.9 %   Smith’s Food & Drug Centers (2007), Furr’s Pharmacy (2008), Beall’s (2009)
179
    67,992     $ 736,269     $ 11.62       93.2 %   Tops Markets (2019)
 
180
    145,192     $ 1,160,549     $ 7.99       100 %    
 
181
    680,287     $ 6,179,753     $ 9.11       99.7 %   K-Mart (2007), Target Stores (2019), Babies R Us (2015), Barnes & Noble (2014), Best Buy (2016), Bed Bath & Beyond (2018), A.C. Moore (2013)
182
    199,504     $ 1,917,592     $ 9.89       97.1 %   Burlington Coat (2004), Jo-Ann Fabrics & Crafts (2014)
183
    55,745     $ 720,783     $ 12.93       100 %   Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc (2015)
 
184
    58,413     $ 526,163     $ 10.19       88.4 %    
 
185
    112,427     $ 1,062,889     $ 9.94       95.1 %   Tops Markets (2016)
 
186
    162,879     $ 1,329,666     $ 8.91       91.6 %   A.J. Wright (2012), Tops Markets (2009)

32


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








187   Arcade, NY (Tops-Arcade)   Tops Plaza-Arcade Route 39     14009       SC       Fee (3)     1995       2004       10 %
188   Avon, NY (Tops Plaza)   Tops Plaza-Avon 270 E. Main Street     14414       SC       Fee (3)     1997       2004       10 %
189   Batavia, NY (BJ’s)   BJ’s Plaza
8326 Lewiston Road
    14020       SC       Fee (3)     1996       2004       14.5 %
190   Batavia, NY (Commons)   Batavia Commons
419 West Main Street
    14020       SC       Fee (3)     1990       2004       14.5 %
191   Batavia, NY (Tops Plaza)   Tops Plaza
8351 Lewiston Road
    14020       SC       Fee (3)     1994       2004       14.5 %
192   Big Flats, NY (Consumer Square)   Big Flats Consumer Square
830 County Route 64
    14814       SC       Fee       1993       2004       100 %
193   Buffalo, NY (Delaware Consumer)   Delaware Consumer Square
2636-2658 Delaware Avenue
    14216       SC       GL       1995       2004       100 %
194   Buffalo, NY (Elmwood)   Elmwood Regal Center
1951-2023 Elmwood Avenue
    14207       SC       Fee       1997       2004       100 %
195   Buffalo, NY (Marshall’s)   Marshall’s Plaza
2150 Delaware Avenue
    14216       SC       Fee       1960       2004       100 %
196   Canandaigua, NY   Tops Plaza
5150 North Street
    14424       SC       Fee       2002       2004       100 %
197   Cheektowaga, NY (Borders)   Borders Books
2015 Walden Avenue
    14225       SC       Fee (3)     1994       2004       14.5 %
198   Cheektowaga, NY (Dicks)   Dick’s Plaza
3637 Union Road
    14225       SC       Fee (3)     1979       2004       14.5 %
199   Cheektowaga, NY (Thruway Plaza)   Thruway Plaza
2195 Harlem Road
    14225       SC       Fee       1965       2004       100 %
200   Cheektowaga, NY (Tops Union)   Tops Plaza — Union Road
3825-3875 Union Road
    14225       SC       Fee (3)     1978       2004       20 %
201   Cheektowaga, NY
(Union Consumer)
  Union Consumer Square
3733-3735 Union Road
    14225       SC       Fee (3)     1989       2004       14.5 %
202   Cheektowaga, NY
(Walden Place)
  Walden Place
2130-2190 Walden Avenue
    14225       SC       Fee (3)     1994       2004       14.5 %
203   Cheektowaga, NY
(Walden)
  Consumer Square
1700-1750 Walden Avenue
    14225       SC       Fee (3)     1997       2004       14.5 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





187     65,915     $ 638,354     $ 9.68       100 %    
188     62,988     $ 514,756     $ 8.17       100 %    
 
189     95,846     $ 766,798     $ 8.00       100 %   BJ’s Wholesale Club (2016)
 
190     49,431     $ 439,613     $ 8.89       100 %    
 
191     37,140     $ 414,670     $ 13.78       81 %   Tops (Not Owned)
 
192     641,264     $ 5,961,017     $ 9.32       99.7 %   Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc (2008), Wal-Mart (2013), Sam’s Club (2013), Tops Markets (2013), Bed Bath & Beyond (2014), Old Navy (2009), Staples (2011), Barnes & Noble (2011), T.J. Maxx (2007), Michaels (2010)
193     229,607     $ 2,010,140     $ 8.75       100 %   Target Stores (2015), A.J. Wright (2012), OfficeMax (2012)
194     133,940     $ 1,492,266     $ 13.98       79.7 %   Regal Cinema (2017), Office Depot (2012)
195     82,196     $ 848,097     $ 10.72       96.3 %   Marshall’s (2009)
 
196     57,498     $ 769,500     $ 13.38       100 %   Tops Markets (2023)
 
197     26,500     $ 609,500     $ 23.00       100 %   Borders (2015)
 
198     174,438     $ 1,230,349     $ 7.51       93.9 %   Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (2015)
199     347,202     $ 2,399,258     $ 7.04       98.1 %   MovieLand 8 Theatres (2019), Tops Markets (2019), Value City Furniture (2009), M & T Bank (2007), Wal-Mart (2017), Home Depot (Not Owned)
200     152,457     $ 1,760,819     $ 11.55       100 %    
 
201     381,193     $ 4,281,066     $ 12.20       92 %   Marshall’s (2009), OfficeMax (2005), Sam’s Club (2024), Circuit City (2016), Jo-Ann Fabrics and Crafts (2015)
202     68,002     $ 644,420     $ 10.85       87.3 %   Media Play (2010)
 
203     255,964     $ 2,116,974     $ 8.51       97.1 %   Office Depot (2009), Linens ’N Things (2015), Michaels (2013), Target Stores (2015)

33


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








204   Chili, NY
(K-mart)
  Chili Plaza
800 Paul Road
    14606       SC       Fee       1998       2004       100 %
205   Cicero, NY
(Bear Rd)
  Bear Road Plaza
709-729 North Main Street
    13212       SC       Fee       1978       2004       100 %
206   Clarence, NY
(Barnes)
  Barnes & Noble
7370 Transit Road
    14031       SC       Fee (3)     1992       2004       14.5 %
207   Clarence, NY
(Eastgate Plaza)
  Eastgate Plaza
Transit & Greiner Roads
    14031       SC       GL (3)     1995       2004       14.5 %
208   Clarence, NY
(Jo-Ann)
  Jo-Ann Plaza
4101 Transit Road
    14221       SC       Fee (3)     1994       2004       14.5 %
209   Clarence, NY
(Premier)
  Premier Place
7864-8020 Transit Road
    14221       SC       Fee (3)     1986       2004       14.5 %
210   Cortland, NY
(Tops Plaza)
  Tops Plaza-Cortland
3836 Route 281
    13045       SC       Fee       1995       2004       100 %
211   Dansville, NY
(Tops)
  Tops Plaza-Dansville
23-65 Franklin Street
    14437       SC       Fee       2001       2004       100 %
212   Depew, NY   Tops Plaza-Depew
5175 Broadway
    14043       SC       Fee       1980       2004       100 %
213   Dewitt, NY
(Dewitt Commons)
  Marshall’s Plaza
3401 Erie Boulevard East
    13214       SC       Fee       2001       2004       100 %
214   Dewitt, NY
(Michael’s/Chuck E C)
  Michael’s-Dewitt
3133 Erie Boulevard
    13214       SC       Fee       2002       2004       100 %
215   Elmira, NY (Tops Plaza)   Tops Plaza-Elmira
Hudson Street
    14904       SC       Fee (3)     1997       2004       10 %
216   Gates, NY (Westgate Plaza)   Westgate Plaza
2000 Chili Avenue
    14624       SC       Fee       1998       2004       100 %
217   Greece, NY   West Ridge Plaza
3042 West Ridge Road
    14626       SC       Fee       1993       2004       100 %
218   Hamburg, NY (BJ’s)   BJ’s Plaza
4408 Milestrip Road
    14075       SC       GL       1990       2004       100 %
219   Hamburg, NY (Dicks- McKinley)   McKinley Place
3701 McKinley Parkway
    14075       SC       Fee       1990       2004       100 %
220   Hamburg, NY (Hamburg Village)   Hamburg Village Square
140 Pine Street
    14075       SC       Fee       1960       2004       100 %
221   Hamburg, NY (Home Depot)   Home Depot Plaza
4405 Milestrip Road
    14219       SC       GL       1999       2004       100 %
222   Hamburg, NY (Milestrip)   McKinley Milestrip Center
3540 McKinley Parkway
    14075       SC       Fee       1999       2004       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





204     116,868     $ 748,189     $ 6.02       100 %   Sears, Roebuck and Co. (2019)
 
205     59,483     $ 510,946     $ 8.59       100 %    
 
206     16,030     $ 304,249     $ 18.98       100 %    
 
207     460,716     $ 3,963,721     $ 8.89       96.8 %   Wal-Mart (2015), Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. (2011), Linens ’N Things (2015), Michaels (2010), BJ’S Wholesale Club, Inc. (2021)
208     92,720     $ 743,588     $ 8.02       100 %   OfficeMax (2009), Jo-Ann Fabrics & Crafts (2015), Big Lots (2015), Home Depot (Not Owned)
209     142,536     $ 1,397,787     $ 10.17       96.4 %   Premier Liquors (2010), Stein Mart (2008)
210     134,223     $ 1,688,442     $ 12.58       100 %   Staples (2032), Tops Markets (2016)
211     62,400     $ 626,969     $ 10.15       99 %   Tops Markets (2051), Blockbuster (2014)
212     148,245     $ 1,437,720     $ 9.90       98 %   Tops Markets (2016), Big Lots B (2011)
213     318,809     $ 2,387,376     $ 9.43       79.4 %   Toys R Us (2018), Marshall’s (2019), Bed Bath & Beyond (2018), A.C. Moore (2014), Syracuse Orthopedic Specialist (2017)
214     49,713     $ 570,166     $ 11.47       100 %   Michaels (2010)
 
215     98,330     $ 1,117,100     $ 11.36       100 %    
 
216     327,809     $ 3,133,458     $ 9.61       99.4 %   Wal-Mart (2021), Staples the Office Superstore (2015)
217     75,916     $ 799,191     $ 10.53       100 %   PetsMart (2008), Jo-Ann Fabrics & Crafts (2015)
218     175,965     $ 1,680,083     $ 9.55       100 %   OfficeMax (2010), BJ’s Wholesale Club (2010)
219     128,944     $ 1,413,676     $ 11.33       96.7 %   Dick’s Sporting Goods (2011), Rosa’s Home Store (2009)
220     92,717     $ 871,467     $ 10.60       88.7 %    
 
221     139,413     $ 1,506,174     $ 10.80       100 %   Home Depot (2012)
 
222     106,774     $ 1,346,637     $ 12.61       100 %   Old Navy (2005), Jo-Ann Fabrics & Crafts (2015)

34


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








223   Hamburg, NY (Tops)   South Park Plaza-Tops
6150 South Park Avenue
    14075       SC       Fee (3)     1990       2004       10 %
224   Hamlin, NY (Tops Plaza)   Tops Plaza-Hamlin
1800 Lake Road
    14464       SC       Fee (3)     1997       2004       10 %
225   Irondequoit, NY (Culver Ridge)   Culver Ridge Plaza
2255 Ridge Road East
    14622       SC       Fee (3)     1972       2004       20 %
226   Irondequoit, NY (Ridgeview)   Ridgeview Place
1850 Ridge Road East
    14617       SC       Fee       2000       2004       100 %
227   Ithaca, NY (Tops Plaza)   Tops Plaza-Ithaca
614 — 722 South Meadow
    14850       SC       Fee       1990       2004       100 %
228   Jamestown, NY   Tops Plaza-Jamestown
Washington Street
    14702       SC       Fee (3)     1997       2004       20 %
229
  Jamestown, NY (Southside)   Southside Plaza
708-744 Foote Avenue
    14701       SC       Fee       1980       2004       100 %
230
  Lancaster, NY (Regal)   Regal Center
6703-6733 Transit Road
    14221       SC       Fee (3)     1997       2004       14.5 %
231
  Leroy, NY   Tops Plaza-Leroy
128 West Main Street
    14482       SC       Fee (3)     1997       2004       20 %
232
  Lockport, NY   Wal-Mart/Tops Plaza
5789 & 5839 Transit Rd & Hamm
    14094       SC       GL       1993       2004       100 %
233
  Medina, NY (Tops)   Tops Plaza-Medina
11200 Maple Ridge Road
    14103       SC       Fee       1996       2004       100 %
234
  New Hartford, NY   Consumer Square
4725-4829 Commercial Drive
    13413       SC       Fee (3)     2002       2004       14.5 %
235
  New Hartford, NY (Tops)   Tops Plaza — Kellogg Rd
40 Kellogg Road
    13413       SC       Fee       1998       2004       100 %
236
  Niagara Falls, NY (Home Depot)   Home Depot Plaza — N. Falls
720 & 750 Builders Way
    14304       SC       Fee       1994       2004       100 %
237
  Niagara Falls, NY (Pine Plaza)   Pine Plaza
8207-8351 Niagara Falls Blvd.
    14304       SC       Fee       1980       2004       100 %
238
  Niagara Falls, NY (Tops- Portage)   Tops Plaza-Portage
1000 Portage Road
    14301       SC       Fee       1991       2004       100 %
239
  Niagara Falls, NY (Wegmans)   Wegmans Plaza
1575-1653 Military Road
    14304       SC       Fee       1998       2004       100 %
240
  Niskayuna, NY   Mohawk Commons
402-442 Balltown Road
    12121       SC       Fee       2002       2004       100 %
241
  North Tonawanda, NY (Mid-City)   Mid-City Plaza
955-987 Payne Avenue
    14120       SC       Fee       1960       2004       100 %
242
  Norwich, NY (Tops)   Tops Plaza-Norwich
54 East Main Street
    13815       SC       GL (3)     1997       2004       10 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





223     84,000     $ 730,500     $ 8.70       100 %    
224     60,488     $ 492,380     $ 8.34       97.6 %    
225     226,812     $ 2,477,346     $ 10.92       100 %    
226     65,229     $ 743,785     $ 12.30       92.7 %    
227     229,320     $ 3,672,835     $ 16.02       100 %   Tops Markets (2051), Michaels (2013), Barnes & Noble (2018), OfficeMax (2014)
228     98,001     $ 1,272,966     $ 12.99       100 %    
229
    63,140     $ 593,122     $ 9.39       100 %   Quality Market (2017)
230
    112,949     $ 944,047     $ 8.49       98.4 %   Regal Cinema (2017)
231
    62,747     $ 581,515     $ 9.27       100 %    
232
    296,582     $ 2,604,135     $ 8.90       98.7 %   Wal-Mart (2015), Tops Markets (2021), Sears Hardware (2006)
233
    80,028     $ 526,400     $ 6.58       100 %   Tops Market (2016)
234
    516,801     $ 5,715,031     $ 11.93       92.7 %   Barnes & Noble (2013), Bed Bath & Beyond (2018), Best Buy (2013), Staples the Office Superstore (2018), Michaels (2013), Wal- Mart (2022), T.J. Maxx (2012)
235
    127,740     $ 1,317,862     $ 12.47       82.7 %   Tops Markets (2018)
236
    154,510     $ 1,461,852     $ 9.50       99.6 %   Home Depot (2019), Regal Cinemas (2019)
237
    82,755     $ 800,529     $ 10.16       95.2 %   OfficeMax (2015)
238
    116,903     $ 1,139,002     $ 10.42       93.5 %   Tops Markets/Eckerd Corp. (2013)
239
    122,876     $ 597,836     $ 5.96       81.6 %   Wegmans (2023)
240
    404,994     $ 4,303,897     $ 10.96       96.9 %    
241
    212,418     $ 2,048,826     $ 11.37       84.8 %   Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2006), Tops (2024)
242
    85,453     $ 1,101,525     $ 12.89       100 %    

35


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








243
  Olean, NY (Wal-Mart)   Wal-Mart Plaza-Olean
3142 West State Street
    14760       SC       Fee       1993       2004       100 %
244
  Ontario, NY   Tops Plaza-Ontario
6254-6272 Furnance Road
    14519       SC       Fee (3)     1998       2004       20 %
245
  Orchard Park, NY   Crossroads Centre
3201-3227 Southwestern Blvd
    14127       SC       Fee (3)     2000       2004       20 %
246
  Plattsburgh, NY   Plattsburgh Consumer Square
Rt. 3 — Cornella Road
    12901       SC       Fee       1993       2004       100 %
247
  Rochester, NY (Hen-Jef)   Hen-Jef Plaza
400 Jefferson Rd @ Henriette
    14620       SC       Fee       1983       2004       100 %
248
  Rochester, NY (Panorama)   Panorama Plaza
1601 Penfield Road
    14625       SC       Fee (3)     1959       2004       20 %
249
  Rochester, NY (Henrietta Plaza)   Henrietta Plaza
1100 Jefferson Road
    14467       SC       Fee       1972       2004       100 %
250
  Rome, NY (Freedom)   Freedom Plaza
205-211 Erie Boulevard West
    13440       SC       Fee       1978       2004       100 %
251
  Springville, NY   Springville Plaza
172-218 South Cascade Drive
    14141       SC       Fee       1980       2004       100 %
252
  Tonawanda, NY (Del-Ton)   Del-Ton Plaza
4220 Delaware Avenue
    14150       SC       Fee       1985       2004       100 %
253
  Tonawanda, NY (Office Depot)   Office Depot Plaza
2309 Eggert Road
    14150       SC       Fee       1976       2004       100 %
254
  Tonawanda, NY (Sher/ Delaware)   Sheridan/Delaware Plaza
1692-1752 Sheridan Drive
    14223       SC       Fee       1950       2004       100 %
255
  Tonawanda, NY (Tops Plaza)   Tops Plaza-Niagara Street
150 Niagara Street
    14150       SC       Fee (3)     1997       2004       10 %
256
  Tonawanda, NY (Tops/ Gander Mtn)   Youngmann Plaza
750 Young Street
    14150       SC       Fee (3)     1985       2004       10 %
257
  Utica, NY (Tops Mohawk St.)   Tops Plaza-Utica
1154 Mohawk Street
    13501       SC       Fee       1961       2004       100 %
258
  Victor, NY   Victor Square
2-10 Commerce Drive
    14564       SC       Fee       2000       2004       100 %
259
  Warsaw, NY   Tops Plaza-Warsaw
2382 Route 19
    14569       SC       Fee (3)     1998       2004       20 %
260
  West Seneca, NY (Home Depot)   Home Depot Plaza
1881 Ridge Road
    14224       SC       GL       1975       2004       100 %
261
  West Seneca, NY (Seneca Ridge)   Seneca Ridge Plaza
3531 Seneca Street
    14224       SC       Fee       1980       2004       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





243
    285,400     $ 2,249,634     $ 8.09       97.4 %   Wal-Mart (2014), Eastwynn Theatres, Inc (2014), BJ’s Wholesale Club (2014), Home Depot (Not Owned)
244
    77,040     $ 751,687     $ 9.76       100 %    
245
    167,805     $ 1,940,019     $ 11.56       100 %    
246
    491,506     $ 3,410,479     $ 7.09       97.9 %   Sam’s Club (2013), Wal-Mart (2013), T.J. Maxx (2013), Pets- Mart (2014), Michaels (2011)
247
    159,517     $ 1,226,189     $ 9.25       83.1 %   City Mattress (2009), Comp USA (2008), PetsMart (2008)
248
    278,241     $ 3,508,971     $ 12.61       100 %    
249
    245,426     $ 2,058,997     $ 8.78       95.6 %   Big Lots, Inc. (2010), Office Depot (2009), Tops Markets (2013)
250
    161,967     $ 819,129     $ 5.06       100 %   Staples the Office Superstore (2015), J.C. Penney (2008), Tops Markets (2021)
251
    107,924     $ 902,505     $ 9.08       92.1 %   Tops Markets (2053), Salvation Army (2009)
252
    55,473     $ 357,498     $ 6.80       94.7 %    
253
    121,846     $ 1,106,050     $ 9.93       91.4 %   CompUSA Inc., Stores LP. (2010), Office Depot (2011)
254
    188,200     $ 1,263,436     $ 6.71       100 %   The Bon Ton (2010), Bon Ton Home Store (2010), Tops Markets (2020)
255
    97,014     $ 1,235,480     $ 12.95       98.3 %    
256
    310,921     $ 2,211,233     $ 7.29       97.5 %    
257
    191,047     $ 1,656,386     $ 12.16       71.3 %   A. J. Wright (2014), Tops Markets (2014)
258
    56,134     $ 947,180     $ 16.87       100 %    
259
    74,105     $ 712,551     $ 9.62       100 %    
260
    139,453     $ 1,336,264     $ 9.86       97.2 %   Home Depot (2016)
261
    62,403     $ 551,570     $ 10.66       82.9 %   Sears, Roebuck & Co. (2006)

36


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








262
  Williamsville, NY   Williamsville Placa
5395 Sheridan Drive
    14221       SC       Fee       1986       2004       100 %
    North Carolina                                                    
   
                                                   
263
  Asheville, NC   River Hills
299 Swannanoa River Road
    28805       SC       Fee (3)     1996       2003       14.5 %
264
  Durham, NC   Oxford Commons
3500 Oxford Road
    27702       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
265
  Fayetteville, NC   Cross Pointe Centre
5075 Morganton Road
    28314       SC       Fee       1985       2003       100 %
266
  Hendersonville, NC   Eastridge Crossing
200 Thompson Street
    28792       SC       GL       1995       2003       100 %
267
  Indian Trail, NC   Union Town Center-Phase I
Independence & Faith Church Ro
    28079       SC       Fee       1999       2004       100 %
268
  Mooresville, NC   Mooresville Consumer Square
355 West Plaza Drive
    28117       SC       Fee       1999       2004       100 %
269
  New Bern, NC   Rivertowne Square
3003 Claredon Blvd
    28561       SC       Fee       1989       2*       100 %
270
  Washington, NC   Pamlico Plaza
536 Pamlico Plaza
    27889       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
271   Waynesville, NC   Lakeside Plaza
201 Paragon Parkway
    28721       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
272   Wilmington, NC   University Centre
S. College Rd & New Centre Dr.
    28403       SC       Fee       1989       2*       100 %
    North Dakota                                                    
   
                                                   
273   Dickinson, ND   Prairie Hills Mall
1681 Third Avenue
    58601       MM       Fee       1978       2*       100 %
274   Grand Forks, ND   Office Max
2500 S Columbia Road
    58201       SC       Fee (3)     1978       1999       83.75 %
    Ohio                                                    
   
                                                   
275   Ashland, OH   Claremont Plaza
US Route 42
    44805       SC       Fee       1977       2*       100 %
276   Ashtabula, OH (Tops)   Tops Plaza-Ashtabula
1144 West Prospect Road
    44004       SC       Fee       2000       2004       100 %
277   Aurora, OH   Barrington Town Square
70-130 Barrington Town Square
    44202       SC       Fee       1996       1*       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





262
    92,382     $ 1,113,196     $ 13.12       91.8 %    
 
 
263
    190,970     $ 1,989,799     $ 10.42       100 %   Goody’s (2007), Carmike Cinemas (2017), 2092 Circuit City (2017), Dick’s Sporting Goods (2017), Michaels (2008), OfficeMax (2011)
264
    213,934     $ 1,164,497     $ 6.22       87.5 %   Food Lion (2010), Burlington Coat Factory (2007), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
265
    196,279     $ 1,530,534     $ 7.93       98.4 %   Dev Rlty (AcMre/Circcty/Stpls) (2012), T.J. Maxx (2006), Bed Bath and Beyond (2014)
266
    47,530     $ 231,772     $ 5.82       83.7 %   Ingles (2009)
 
267
    91,400     $ 875,082     $ 11.09       86.3 %   Food Lion (2020)
 
268
    447,946     $ 3,666,637     $ 9.16       89.4 %   Wal-Mart (2019), Goody’s (2010)
 
269
    68,130     $ 592,213     $ 8.83       98.5 %   Goody’s (2007), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
270
    93,527     $ 441,933     $ 5.05       93.6 %   Wal-Mart (2009), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
271     181,894     $ 1,166,919     $ 6.42       100 %   Wal-Mart (2011), Food Lion (2011)
272     410,491     $ 3,237,528     $ 9.03       87.2 %   Barnes & Noble (2007), Lowe’s Home Center (2014), Old Navy (2006), Bed Bath & Beyond (2012), Ross Dress For Less (2012), Goody’s (2005), Badcock Furniture (2014), Sam’s Club (Not Owned)
 
273     266,502     $ 1,079,836     $ 4.48       90.4 %   K-Mart (2008), Herberger’s (2005), J.C. Penney (2008)
274     31,812       0     $ 0.00       0 %    
 
 
275     110,505     $ 72,234     $ 2.68       24.4 %   Tractor Supply (2010)
 
276     57,874     $ 898,312     $ 15.52       100 %   Tops Markets (2021)
 
277     64,700     $ 1,277,463     $ 12.11       95.3 %   Marquee Cinemas (Not Owned), Heinen’s (Not Owned)

37


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








278   Bellefontaine, OH   South Main Street Plaza
2250 South Main Street
    43311       SC       Fee       1995       1998       100 %
279   Boardman, OH   Southland Crossing
I-680 & US Route 224
    44514       SC       Fee       1997       1*       100 %
280   Canton, OH (Phase I & II)   Belden Park Crossings
5496 Dressler Road
    44720       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1*       14.5 %
281   Chillicothe, OH   Chillicothe Place
867 N Bridge Street
    45601       SC       GL (3)     1974       2*       20 %
282   Chillicothe, OH (Lowes)   Chillicothe Place (Lowes)
867 N Bridge Street
    45601       SC       Fee       1974       2*       100 %
283   Cincinnati, OH   Glenway Crossing
5100 Glencrossing Way
    45238       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
284   Cleveland, OH (West 65th)   K-Mart Plaza — West 65th
3250 West 65th Street
    44102       SC       Fee       1977       2*       100 %
285   Columbus, OH (Consumer Square)   Consumer Square West
3630 Soldano Blvd
    43228       SC       Fee       1989       2004       100 %
286   Columbus, OH (Dublin Village)   Dublin Village Center
6561-6815 Dublin Center Drive
    43017       SC       Fee (3)     1987       1998       80.01 %
287   Columbus, OH (Easton Market)   Easton Market
3740 Easton Market
    43230       SC       Fee       1998       1998       100 %
288   Columbus, OH (Lennox Town)   Lennox Town Center
1647 Olentangy River Road
    43212       SC       Fee (3)     1997       1998       50 %
289   Columbus, OH (Sun Center)   Sun Center
3622-3860 Dublin Granville Rd
    43017       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1998       79.45 %
290   Dublin, OH (Perimeter Center)   Perimeter Center
6644-6804 Perimeter Loop Road
    43017       SC       Fee       1996       1998       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





278     52,399     $ 432,292     $ 8.25       100 %   Goody’s Store (2010), Staples (2010)
279     506,254     $ 4,090,327     $ 8.18       97.5 %   Lowe’s Companies (2016), Babies R Us (2009), Staples Store (2012), Dicks Clothing & Sporting (2012), Wal-Mart (2017), PetsMart (2013), Giant Eagle, Inc (2018)
280     478,106     $ 4,946,630     $ 10.54       98.2 %   American Signature (2011), H.H. Gregg Appliances (2011), Jo-Ann Stores (2008), PetsMart (2013), Dick’s Clothing & Sporting (2010), DSW Shoe Warehouse (2012), Kohl’s Department Store (2016), Target (Not Owned)
281     105,512     $ 1,012,509     $ 9.60       100 %   Kroger (2041), OfficeMax (2013)
282     130,497     $ 822,132     $ 6.30       100 %   Lowe’s Home Centers (2015)
283     235,433     $ 1,941,952     $ 10.44       79 %   Winn Dixie Stores (2010), Michaels (2006)
284     49,420     $ 287,689     $ 5.82       100 %   Great A & P Tea (2007), K-Mart (Not Owned)
285     356,515     $ 2,341,325     $ 7.39       88.9 %   OfficeMax (2010), Kroger Store (2014), Target Stores (2011)
286     326,912     $ 1,664,211     $ 11.79       43.2 %   AMC Theatre (2007), Max Sports Center (2006), BJ’s Wholesale Club (Not Owned)
287     509,611     $ 6,167,726     $ 12.10       100 %   CompUSA, Inc (2013), Staples, Inc. (2013), PetsMart, Inc. (2015), Golfsmith Golf Center (2013), Michaels (2008), Galyan’s (2013), DSW Shoe Warehouse (2012), Kittle’s Home Furnishings (2012), Bed Bath & Beyond (2014), T.J. Maxx (2008)
288     352,913     $ 3,344,654     $ 9.48       100 %   Target (2016), Barnes & Noble (2007), Staples (2011), AMC Theatres Lennox (2021)
289     305,428     $ 3,473,945     $ 11.37       100 %   Babies R Us (2011), Michaels (2013), Rhodes Furniture (2012), Stein Mart (2007), Big Bear (2016), Staples (2010)
290     137,556     $ 1,512,999     $ 11.00       100 %   Giant Eagle (2014)

38


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








291   Elyria, OH   Elyria Shopping Center
825 Cleveland
    44035       SC       Fee       1977       2*       100 %
292   Gallipolis, OH   Gallipolis Marketplace
2145 Eastern Avenue
    45631       SC       Fee       1998       2003       100 %
293   Grove City, OH (Derby Square)   Derby Square Shopping Center
2161-2263 Stringtown Road
    43123       SC       Fee (3)     1992       1998       20 %
294   Hamilton, OH   H.H. Gregg
1371 Main Street
    43450       SC       Fee       1986       1998       100 %
295   Hillsboro, OH   Hillsboro Shopping Center
1100 North High Street
    45133       SC       Fee       1979       2*       100 %
296   Huber Hts., OH   North Heights Plaza
8280 Old Troy Pike
    45424       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
297   Lebanon, OH   Countryside Place
1879 Deerfield Road
    45036       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
298   Macedonia, OH   Macedonia Commons
Macedonia Commons Blvd.
    44056       SC       Fee (3)     1994       1994       50 %
299   Macedonia, OH
(Phase II)
  Macedonia Commons (Phase II)
8210 Macedonia Commons
    44056       SC       Fee       1999       1*       100 %
300   North Olmsted, OH   Great Northern Plaza North
25859-26437 Great Northern
    44070       SC       Fee (3)     1958       1997       14.5 %
301   Pataskala, OH   Village Market/Rite Aid Center
78-80 Oak Meadow Drive
    43062       SC       Fee       1980       1998       100 %
302   Pickerington, OH   Shoppes At Turnberry
1701-1797 Hill Road North
    43147       SC       Fee       1990       1998       100 %
303   Solon, OH   Uptown Solon
Kruse Drive
    44139       SC       Fee       1998       1*       100 %
304   Stow, OH   Stow Community Shopping Center
Kent Road
    44224       SC       Fee       1997       1*       100 %
305   Tiffin, OH   Tiffin Mall
870 West Market Street
    44883       MM       Fee       1980       2*       100 %
306   Toledo, OH   Springfield Commons Shopping
S. Holland-Sylvania Road
    43528       SC       Fee (3)     1999       1*       20 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





291     150,200     $ 521,970     $ 7.44       46.7 %   Tops Markets (2010)
 
292     25,950     $ 302,094     $ 13.16       88.4 %   Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
 
293     128,210     $ 777,358     $ 14.61       41.5 %    
 
294     40,000     $ 230,000     $ 5.75       100 %   Roundy’s (2006)
 
295     58,564     $ 168,771     $ 6.34       45.5 %   Bob & Carl’s (Not Owned)
 
296     163,819     $ 1,436,946     $ 10.05       87.2 %   Cub Foods (2011), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
297     17,000     $ 174,484     $ 10.26       100 %   Wal-Mart (Not Owned), ERB Lumber (Not Owned)
298     233,639     $ 2,804,179     $ 11.11       98.4 %   First Natl. Supermarkets (2018), Kohl’s (2016), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
299     169,481     $ 1,601,734     $ 9.45       100 %   Cinemark (2019), Home Depot (2020)
300     624,480     $ 7,681,969     $ 12.75       96.1 %   Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. (2012), PetsMart (2008), Home Depot (2019), K & G Men’s Company, Inc. (2008), Jo-Ann Stores (2009), Marc’s (2012), CompUSA Inc. (2008), Best Buy (2010), Marshall’s (2006), Kronheims Furniture (2012), Top’s Supermarket (Not Owned)
301     33,270     $ 194,600     $ 5.85       100 %   Cardinal (Gardners/Lancaster) (2007)
302     59,495     $ 673,091     $ 14.45       75.8 %    
 
303     183,288     $ 2,642,366     $ 15.77       91.4 %   Mustard Seed Mkt & Cafe (2019), Bed Bath and Beyond (2009), Borders (2018)
304     404,480     $ 2,925,915     $ 7.28       99.3 %   K-Mart (2006), Bed Bath and Beyond (2011), Giant Eagle, Inc. (2017), Kohl’s (2019), Office Max (2011), Borders Outlet (2003), Target (Not Owned)
305     180,969     $ 805,817     $ 6.54       68.1 %   Marquee Cinemas (2018), J.C. Penney (2010)
306     241,129     $ 2,744,714     $ 10.90       99.1 %   Kohl’s (2019), Gander Mountain, L.L.C. (2014), Bed Bath & Beyond (2010), Old Navy (2005), Babies R Us (Not Owned)

39


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








307   Toledo, OH
(Dicks)
  Dick’s Sporting Goods
851 W Alexis Road
    43612       SC       Fee       1995       2004       100 %
308   Westlake, OH   West Bay Plaza
30100 Detroit Road
    44145       SC       Fee       1974       2*       100 %
309   Wilmington, OH   South Ridge Shopping Center
1025 S South Street
    45177       SC       Fee       1977       2*       100 %
310   Xenia, OH   West Park Square
1700 West Park Square
    45385       SC       Fee       1994       1*       100 %
    Oregon                                                    
   
                                                   
311   Portland, OR   Tanasbourne Town Center
NW Evergreen Pkwy & NW Ring Rd
    97006       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1996       50 %
    Pennsylvania                                                    
   
                                                   
312
  Allentown, PA (West)   West Valley Marketplace
1091 Mill Creek Road
    18106       SC       Fee       2001       2003       100 %
313
  E. Norriton, PA   K-mart Plaza
2692 Dekalb Pike
    19401       SC       Fee       1975       2*       100 %
314
  Erie (Peachstreet), PA   Peach Street Square
1902 Keystone Drive
    16509       SC       GL       1995       1*       100 %
315
  Erie, PA (Market)   Erie Marketplace
6660-6750 Peach Street
    16509       SC       Fee (3)     2003       2003       14.50 %
316
  Erie, PA (Tops-Erie)   Tops Plaza-Erie
1520 West 25th Street
    16505       SC       Fee       1995       2004       100 %
317
  Hanover, PA (BJ’s)   BJ’s-Hanover
1785 Airport Road South
    18109       SC       Fee       1991       2004       100 %
318
  Monaca, PA   Township Marketplace
115 Wagner Road
    15061       SC       GL (3)     1999       2003       14.50 %
319
  Monaca, PA (Cinemark)   Township Marketplace
115 Wagner Road
    15061       SC       Fee       1999       2003       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





307     80,160     $ 501,000     $ 6.25       100 %   Dick’s Sporting Goods (2016)
308     162,330     $ 1,350,853     $ 8.32       100 %   Marc’s (2009), K-Mart (2009)
309     55,130     $ 229,424     $ 5.45       76.3 %   Community Markets (2013)
310     104,873     $ 816,231     $ 8.16       86 %   Kroger (2019), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
311     309,617     $ 5,112,337     $ 17.00       97.1 %   Barnes & Noble (2011), Office Depot (2010), Haggan’s (2021), Linens ’N Things (2017), Ross Dress For Less (2008), Michaels (2009), Nordstrom (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned), Mervyn’s (Not Owned)
312
    241,077     $ 2,312,117     $ 9.59       100 %   Wal-Mart (2021)
313
    173,876     $ 1,223,809     $ 6.99       94.7 %   K-Mart (2005), Big Lots (2010)
314
    557,769     $ 5,033,255     $ 8.61       100 %   Lowe’s Home Ctr (2015), Media Play (2011), Kohl’s (2016), Wal-Mart (2015), Cinemark (2011), PetsMart (2015), Circuit City SuperStore (2020), Home Depot (Not Owned)
315
    107,537     $ 1,066,739     $ 9.27       100 %   Marshall’s (2013), Bed Bath & Beyond (2013), Babies R Us (2015), Target (Not Owned)
316
    99,631     $ 1,250,882     $ 12.56       100 %   Tops Markets (B) (2016)
317
    112,230     $ 784,631     $ 6.99       100 %   BJ’s Wholesale Club (2011)
318
    253,110     $ 1,996,910     $ 7.89       100 %   Lowe’s (2027), Shop ’N Save (2019)
319
    38,000     $ 617,500     $ 16.25       100 %   Cinemark (2019)

40


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








    South Carolina                                                    
   
                                                   
320
  Camden, SC   Springdale Plaza
1671 Springdale Drive
    29020       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
321   Charleston, SC   Ashley Crossing
2245 Ashley Crossing Drive
    29414       SC       Fee       1991       2003       100 %
322   Columbia, SC (Harbison)   Harbison Court
Harbison Blvd
    29212       SC       Fee (3)     1991       2002       14.5 %
323   Mt. Pleasant, SC   Wando Crossing
1500 HighWay 17 North
    29465       SC       Fee       1992       1995       100 %
324   N. Charleston, SC   North Pointe Plaza
7400 Rivers Avenue
    29406       SC       Fee       1989       2*       100 %
325   N. Charleston, SC
(N Charl Ctr)
  North Charleston Center
5900 Rivers Avenue
    29406       SC       Fee       1980       2004       100 %
326   Orangeburg, SC   North Road Plaza
2795 North Road
    29115       SC       Fee       1994       1995       100 %
327   S. Anderson, SC   Crossroads Plaza
406 Highway 28 By-Pass
    29624       SC       Fee       1990       1994       100 %
328   Simpsonville, SC   Fairview Station
621 Fairview Road
    29681       SC       Fee       1990       1994       100 %
329   Union, SC   West Towne Plaza
U.S. Hwy 176 By-Pass #1
    29379       SC       Fee       1990       1993       100 %
    South Dakota                                                    
   
                                                   
330   Watertown, SD   Watertown Mall
1300 9th Avenue
    56401       MM       Fee       1977       2*       100 %
    Tennessee                                                    
   
                                                   
331   Brentwood, TN   Cool Springs Pointe
I-65 and Moore’s Lane
    37027       SC       Fee       1999       2000       100 %
332   Chattanooga, TN   Overlook at Hamilton Place
2288 Gunbarrel Road
    37421       SC       Fee       1992       2003       100 %
333   Columbia, TN   Columbia Square
845 Nashville Highway
    38401       SC       Fee (3)     1993       2003       10 %
334   Farragut, TN   Farragut Pointe
11132 Kingston Pike
    37922       SC       Fee (3)     1991       2003       10 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





320
    180,127     $ 1,196,149     $ 6.70       99.1 %   Winn Dixie Stores (2011), Belk (2015), Wal-Mart Super Center (Not Owned)
321     188,883     $ 1,470,324     $ 7.71       94.4 %   Food Lion (2011), Wal-Mart (2011)
322     252,689     $ 2,452,124     $ 11.15       87.1 %   Barnes & Noble (2011), Ross Dress For Less (2014), Marshall’s (2007), OfficeMax (2011), Babies ‘R’ Us (Not Owned)
323     209,139     $ 1,984,144     $ 10.02       94.7 %   Piggly Wiggly (2012), Office Depot (2010), T.J. Maxx (2007), Marshall’s of MA, Inc. (2011), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
324     294,471     $ 2,060,287     $ 7.00       100 %   Wal-Mart (2009), OfficeMax (2007), Helig Meyers (Not Owned), Service Merchandise (Not Owned)
325     235,501     $ 1,396,966     $ 7.58       78.3 %   Babies R Us (2005), Big Lots (2009)
326     50,760     $ 524,714     $ 10.34       100 %   Goody’s (2008), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
327     26,050     $ 94,462     $ 4.28       84.6 %    
328     142,133     $ 877,174     $ 6.17       100 %   Ingles Markets (2011), Kohl’s Department Stores (2015)
329     184,331     $ 959,734     $ 5.46       95.4 %   Wal-Mart (2009), Belk Stores Services, Inc. (2010), Winn Dixie Stores (2010)
330     285,372     $ 1,248,660     $ 7.09       61.7 %   Herberger’s (2009), J.C. Penney (2008), Hy-Vee SuperMarket (Not Owned)
331     201,516     $ 2,466,112     $ 13.36       91.6 %   Best Buy (2014), Ross Dress For Less (2015), Linens ’N Things (2014), DSW Shoe Warehouse (2008)
332     214,918     $ 1,659,550     $ 8.62       89.5 %   Best Buy (2014), Hobby Lobby (2014), Fresh Market (2014)
333     68,948     $ 493,343     $ 7.80       91.7 %   Kroger (2022)
334     71,311     $ 525,567     $ 7.78       94.7 %   Bi-Lo (2011)

41


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








335
  Goodlettsville, TN   Northcreek Commons
101-139 Northcreek Boulevard
    37072       SC       Fee (3)     1987       2003       20 %
336
  Hendersonville, TN   Hendersonville Lowe’s
1050 Lowe’s Road
    37075       SC       Fee       1999       2003       100 %
337
  Memphis, TN   Country Bridge
9020 US Highway 64
    38002       SC       Fee       1993       2003       100 %
338
  Murfreesboro, TN
(Memorial)
  Memorial Village
710 Memorial Boulevard
    37130       SC       Fee       1993       2003       100 %
339
  Murfreesboro, TN
(Towne)
  Towne Centre
Old Fort Parkway
    37129       SC       Fee (3)     1998       2003       14.5 %
340   Nashville, TN   The Marketplace
Charlotte Pike
    37209       SC       Fee (3)     1998       2003       14.5 %
    Texas                                                    
   
                                                   
341   Austin, TX   Shops At Tech Ridge
Center Ridge Drive
    78728       SC       Fee (3)     2003       2003       24.75 %
342   Frisco, TX   Frisco Marketplace
7010 Preston Road
    75035       SC       Fee       2003       2003       100 %
343   Ft. Worth, TX   Eastchase Market
SWC Eastchase Pkwy & I-30
    76112       SC       Fee (3)     1995       1996       50 %
344   Ft. Worth, TX
(Fossil Creek)
  Fossil Creek
Western Center Blvd
    76137       SC       Fee       1991       2002       100 %
345   Irving, TX   MacArthur Marketplace
Market Place Boulevard
    75063       SC       Fee       2004       2003       100 %
346   Lewisville, TX
(Lakepointe)
  Lakepointe Crossings
S Stemmons Freeway
    75067       SC       Fee (3)     1991       2002       14.5 %
347   McKinney, TX   McKinney Marketplace
US Hwy 75 & El Dorado Pkwy
    75070       SC       Fee       2000       2003       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





335
    84,441     $ 726,207     $ 8.60       100 %   Kroger (2012)
 
336
    133,144     $ 1,222,439     $ 9.18       100 %   Lowe’s (2019)
 
337
    64,223     $ 543,385     $ 8.92       94.8 %   Kroger (2012)
 
338
    117,750     $ 726,764     $ 6.49       95 %   Murfreesboro Athletic Club (2014)
 
339
    108,180     $ 1,299,330     $ 12.01       100 %   T.J. Maxx (2008), Books-A-Million (2009), Lowe’s (Not Owned), Toys R Us (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned)
340     167,795     $ 1,639,263     $ 9.77       100 %   Lowe’s (2019), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
 
341     271,139     $ 4,112,163     $ 14.56       100 %   Ross Dress For Less (2014), Linens ’N Things (2014), Hobby Lobby (2018), Ultimate Electronics (2019), Toys R Us (Not Owned), Super Target (Not Owned)
342     15,359     $ 576,241     $ 18.39       98.3 %   Kohl’s (Not Owned)
 
343     205,017     $ 1,980,999     $ 13.75       71.9 %   United Artists Theatre (2012), PetsMart (2011), Ross Dress For Less (2006), Target (Not Owned), Toys R Us (Not Owned), Office Depot (Not Owned)
344     68,515     $ 831,435     $ 16.58       73.2 %    
 
345     147,010     $ 2,504,624     $ 14.11       98.4 %   Marquee Cinema (2018), Office Max (2014), Kohl’s (Not Owned), Sam’s Club (Not Owned), Wal-Mart (Not Owned)
346     311,039     $ 3,179,320     $ 10.22       100 %   99 Cents Only Store (2009), The Roomstore (2007), PetsMart (2009), Best Buy (2010), Academy Sports (2016), Mardel Christian Bookstore (2012), Toys R Us (Not Owned), Conn’s Appliance (Not Owned), Garden Ridge (Not Owned)
347     118,970     $ 1,261,803     $ 10.79       98.3 %   Kohl’s (2021), Albertson’s (Not Owned)

42


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








348   Mesquite, TX   The Marketplace At Town Center
Southbound Frontage Rd I 635
    75150       SC       Fee       2001       2003       100 %
349   San Antonio, TX
(Bandera Pt)
  Bandera Point North
State Loop 1604/Bandera Road
    78227       SC       Fee       2001       1*       100 %
    Utah                                                    
   
                                                   
350   Logan, UT   Family Place @ Logan
400 North Street
    84321       SC       Fee       1975       1998       100 %
351   Midvale, UT   Family Center At Fort Union 50
900 East Ft Union Blvd
    84047       SC       Fee       1973       1998       100 %
352   Ogden, UT   Family Center At Ogden 5-Point
21-129 Harrisville Road
    84404       SC       Fee       1977       1998       100 %
353   Orem, UT   Family Center At Orem
1300 South Street
    84058       SC       Fee       1991       1998       100 %
354   Riverdale, UT   Family Center At Riverdale 510
1050 West Riverdale Road
    84405       SC       Fee       1995       1998       100 %
355   Salt Lake City, UT (33rd)   Family Place @ 33rd South
3300 South Street
    84115       SC       Fee       1978       1998       100 %
356   Taylorsville, UT   Family Center At Midvalley 503
5600 South Redwood
    84123       SC       Fee       1982       1998       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





348     164,625     $ 2,283,544     $ 13.35       100 %   Ultimate Electronics (2018), Linens ’N Things (2013), Michaels (2012), Ross Dress For Less (2013), Kohl’s (Not Owned)
349     278,727     $ 4,179,112     $ 14.23       97.6 %   T.J. Maxx (2011), Linens ’N Things (2012), Old Navy (2006), Ross Dress For Less (2012), Barnes & Noble (2011), Kohl’s (Not Owned), Target (Not Owned), Lowe’s (Not Owned)
 
350     19,200     $ 97,560     $ 13.55       37.5 %   Rite Aid (Not Owned)
 
351     661,469     $ 6,762,206     $ 10.78       94.8 %   Wal-Mart (Not Owned) (2015), Babies R Us (2014), Office Max (2007), Smith’s Food & Drugs (2024), Media Play (2016), Bed Bath & Beyond (2014), Ross Dress For Less (2011), Wal-Mart (2015)
352     162,316     $ 760,851     $ 5.61       83.6 %   Harmons (2012)
 
353     150,667     $ 1,552,954     $ 10.31       100 %   Kids R Us (2011), Media Play (2015), Office Depot (2008), Jo-Ann Fabrics and Crafts (2012), R.C. Willey (Not Owned), Toys R Us (Not Owned)
354     590,313     $ 4,622,846     $ 8.02       95.7 %   Target Superstore (2017), Meier & Frank (2011), OfficeMax (2008), Gart Sports (2012), Sportman’s Warehouse (2009), Media Play (2016), Circuit City (2016)
355     35,459     $ 230,932     $ 8.90       73.2 %    
 
356     744,770     $ 7,094,224     $ 10.93       87.1 %   Media Play (2015), Office Max (2008), Circuit City (2016), PetsMart (2012), Shopko (2014), Jo-Ann Stores (2015), Gart Sports (2017), 24 Hour Fitness (2017), Bed Bath & Beyond (2015), Ross Dress For Less (2014), Harmons Superstore (Not Owned)

43


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








    Vermont                                                    
   
                                                   
357   Berlin, VT   Berlin Mall
282 Berlin Mall Rd.,
Unit #28
    05602       MM       Fee       1986       2*       100 %
    Virginia                                                    
   
                                                   
358   Chester, VA   Bermuda Square
12607-12649 Jefferson Davis
    23831       SC       Fee       1978       2003       100 %
359   Fairfax, VA   Fairfax Towne Center
12210 Fairfax Towne Center
    22033       SC       Fee (3)     1994       1995       14.5 %
360   Lynchburg, VA   Candlers Station
3700 Candlers Mountain Road
    24502       SC       Fee       1990       2003       100 %
361   Lynchburg, VA (Fairview)   Fairview Square
2215 Florida Avenue
    24501       SC       Fee       1992       2004       100 %
362   Martinsville, VA   Liberty Fair Mall
240 Commonwealth Boulevard
    24112       MM       Fee (3)     1989       2*       50 %
363   Midlothian, VA   Genito Crossing
Hull Street Road
    23112       SC       Fee       1985       2003       100 %
364   Pulaski, VA   Memorial Square
1000 Memorial Drive
    24301       SC       Fee       1990       2*       100 %
365   Winchester, VA   Apple Blossom Corners
2190 S. Pleasant Valley
    22601       SC       Fee (3)     1990       2*       20 %
    Washington                                                    
   
                                                   
366   Everett, WA   Puget Park
520 128th Street SW
    98204       SC       Fee (3)     1981       2001       20 %
367   Kirkland, WA   Totem Lakes
Totem Lakes Boulevard
    98034       SC       Fee (3)     1999       2004       20 %
    West Virginia                                                    
   
                                                   
368   Barboursville, WV   Office Max Center
5-13 Mall Road
    25504       SC       GL       1985       1998       100 %
    Wisconsin                                                    
   
                                                   
369   Brookfield, WI (SW)   Shoppers World of Brookfield
North 124th Street and West CA
    53005       SC       Fee       1967       2003       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





 
357     174,515     $ 1,576,219     $ 9.07       99.6 %   Wal-Mart (2014), J.C. Penney (2009)
 
 
358     116,310     $ 1,218,626     $ 10.48       100 %   Ukrop’s (2008)
 
359     253,297     $ 4,293,302     $ 17.88       94.8 %   Safeway (2019), T.J. Maxx (2009), Tower Records (2009), Bed Bath & Beyond (2010), United Artists (2014)
360     275,765     $ 2,097,407     $ 8.39       90.7 %   Goody’s (2006), Movies 10 (2015), Circuit City (2009), Staples (2013), T.J. Maxx (2009), Toys R Us (Not Owned)
361     87,209     $ 338,376     $ 6.38       60.9 %   Food Lion (2012)
 
362     435,057     $ 2,785,973     $ 7.03       91.1 %   Goody’s (2006), Belk/Leggetts (2009), J.C. Penney (2009), Sears (2009), OfficeMax (2012), Kroger (2017)
363     79,407     $ 709,320     $ 9.21       97 %   Food Lion (2005)
 
364     143,299     $ 886,566     $ 6.34       97.6 %   Wal-Mart (2011), Food Lion (2011)
365     240,560     $ 2,379,784     $ 9.65       100 %   Martin’s Food Store (2040), Kohl’s (2018), OfficeMax (2012), Books-A-Million (2008)
 
366     41,065     $ 424,381     $ 13.15       78.6 %   Albertson’s (Not Owned)
 
367     226,188     $ 2,705,520     $ 14.80       81.5 %   Guitar Center (2007), Ross Dress for Less (2010), CompUSA (2006), Rite Aid (Not Owned)
 
368     70,900     $ 383,825     $ 5.41       100 %   Discount Emporium (2006), Goody’s (2014), Value City (Not Owned)
 
369     190,142     $ 1,500,185     $ 7.89       100 %   T.J. Maxx (2005), Marshall’s Mega Store (2009), OfficeMax (2010), Burlington Coat Factory (2007)

44


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Shopping Center Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                         
Type of DDR
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest








370   Brown Deer, WI
(Center)
  Brown Deer Center
North Green Bay Road
    53209       SC       Fee       1967       2003       100 %
371   Brown Deer, WI (Market)   Market Place of Brown Deer
North Green Bay Road
    53209       SC       Fee       1989       2003       100 %
372   Milwaukee, WI   Point Loomis
South 27th Street
    53221       SC       Fee       1962       2003       100 %
373   West Allis, WI
(West)
  West Allis Center
West Cleveland Ave. and S. 108
    53214       SC       Fee       1968       2003       100 %

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                                     
Company
Owned Average
Gross Total Base Rent
Leasable Annualized (Per SF) Percent
Area (SF) Base Rent (2) Leased Anchor Tenants (Lease Expiration)





370     266,716     $ 1,935,066     $ 7.26       100 %   Kohl’s (2023), Michaels (2012), OfficeMax (2005), T.J. Maxx/Burlington (2008), Old Navy (2012)
371     143,372     $ 1,029,892     $ 7.77       92.5 %   Marshall’s Mega Store (2009), Pick ’N Save (2005)
372     160,533     $ 707,571     $ 4.41       100 %   Kohl’s (2007), Pick ’N Save (2007)
373     246,081     $ 1,419,859     $ 5.47       100 %   Kohl’s (2008), Marshall’s Mega Store (2009), Pick ’N Save (2008)


1*  Property developed by the Company.
 
2*  Original IPO Property.

(1)  “SC” indicates a power center or a community shopping center, “LC” indicates a lifestyle center and “MM” indicates an enclosed mini-mall.
 
(2)  Calculated as total annualized base rentals divided by Company-owned GLA actually leased as of December 31, 2004.
 
(3)  One of the one hundred-three (103) properties owned through joint ventures (not including two of which were consolidated by the Company at December 31, 2004) which serve as collateral for joint venture mortgage debt aggregating approximately $1,803.4 million (of which the Company’s proportionate share is $420.8 million) as of December 31, 2004 and which is not reflected in the consolidated indebtedness.

45


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation

Service Merchandise Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                                                     
Company-
Owned
Type of DDR Gross Total Average
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership Leasable Annualized Base Rent Percent
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest Area (SF) Base Rent (Per SF) (2) Leased












    Alabama                                                                                
   
                                                                               
1   Huntsville, AL   930A Old Monrovia Road   35806     SC       Fee       1984       2002       24.63%       54,200     $ 350,000     $ 7.00       92.3%  
    Arizona                                                                                
   
                                                                               
2   Glendale, AZ   10404 North 43rd Street   85302     SC       Fee       1984       2002       24.63%       51,933     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
3   Mesa, AZ   1360 West Southern Avenue   85202     SC       Fee       1984       2002       24.63%       51,735     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
4   Mesa, AZ   6233 East Southern Blvd.   85206     SC       Fee       1991       2002       24.63%       53,312     $ 712,634     $ 13.37       100%  
    California                                                                                
   
                                                                               
5   San Francisco, CA   180 East El Camino Real   94080     SC       Lease       1982       2002       24.63%       45,416     $ 238,434     $ 5.25       100%  
    Connecticut                                                                                
   
                                                                               
6   Danbury, CT   67 Newton Road   06810     SC       Lease       1978       2002       24.63%       51,750     $ 286,925     $ 10.87       51%  
7   Manchester, CT   1520 Pleasant Valley Rd.   06040     SC       GL       1993       2002       24.63%       49,905     $ 485,844     $ 9.74       100%  
    Delaware                                                                                
   
                                                                               
8   Dover, DE   1380 North Dupont Highway   19901     SC       Fee       1992       2002       24.63%       50,001     $ 352,047     $ 7.04       100%  
    Florida                                                                                
   
                                                                               
9   Bradenton, FL   825 Cortez Road West   34207     SC       Lease       1995       2002       24.63%       53,638     $ 274,385     $ 5.12       100%  
10   Ocala, FL   Shady Oaks Shopping Cntr
2405 Southwest 27th Avenue
  32671     SC       Lease       1981       2002       24.63%       54,816     $ 286,732     $ 5.23       100%  
11   Orlando, FL*   7175 West Colonial Drive   32818     SC       Fee       1989       2002       24.63%       51,550     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
12   Pembroke Pines, FL   11251 Pines Blvd.   33026     SC       Fee       1994       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 506,116     $ 10.12       100%  
13   Pensacola, FL   7303 Plantation Road   32504     SC       Fee       1976       2002       24.63%       24,618     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
14   St. Petersburg, FL   2500 66th Street North   33710     SC       Fee       1975       2002       24.63%       69,282     $ 408,912     $ 12.00       49.2%  
15   Stuart, FL   3257 N. W. Federal Highway   34957     SC       GL       1989       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 427,968     $ 8.56       100%  
16   Tampa, FL   Hillsborough Galleria
4340 Hillsborough Avenue
  33614     SC       Fee       1989       2002       24.63%       50,246     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
17   West Melbourne, FL*   1557 West New Haven Avenue   34773     SC       Lease       1984       2002       24.63%       26,317     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
    Georgia                                                                                
   
                                                                               
18   Duluth, GA   2075 Market Street   30136     SC       Fee       1983       2002       24.63%       56,225     $ 289,559     $ 5.15       100%  
19   Macon, GA   1689 Eisenhower Parkway   31206     SC       Lease       1973       2002       24.63%       80,000     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
20   Morrow, GA   1400 Morrow Industrial Park   30260     SC       Fee       1975       2002       24.63%       57,217     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
    Illinois                                                                                
   
                                                                               
21   Burbank, IL   7600 South Lacrosse Avenue   60459     SC       Fee       1984       2002       24.63%       54,000     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
22   Crystal Lake, IL   5561 Northwest Highway   60014     SC       Fee       1989       2002       24.63%       52,797     $ 161,700     $ 5.50       55.7%  
23   Downers Grove, IL   1508 Butterfield Road   60515     SC       Lease       1973       2002       24.63%       35,943     $ 420,000     $ 11.69       100%  
24   Lansing, IL   16795 South Torrence Avenue   60438     SC       Fee       1986       2002       24.63%       44,101     $ 110,489     $ 7.40       33.9%  
25   Haumburg, IL   1440 Golf Rd.   60173     SC       GL       1993       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 526,250     $ 10.52       100%  
26   Waukegan, IL   300 Lakehurst Road   60085     SC       Fee       1981       2002       24.63%       66,840     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
    Indiana                                                                                
   
                                                                               
27   Castleton, IN   8410 Castleton Corner Drive   46250     SC       Lease       1983       2002       24.63%       30,350     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
28   Evansville, IN   300 North Green River Road   47715     SC       Lease       1978       2002       24.63%       60,000     $ 374,238     $ 8.98       69.5%  

46


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Service Merchandise Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                                                     
Company-
Owned
Type of DDR Gross Total Average
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership Leasable Annualized Base Rent Percent
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest Area (SF) Base Rent (Per SF) (2) Leased












    Kentucky                                                                                
   
                                                                               
29   Lexington, KY   1555 New Circle Road   40509     SC       Lease       1978       2002       24.63%       60,000     $ 367,684     $ 6.13       100%  
30   Louisville, KY   5025 Shelbyville Road   40207     SC       Fee       1989       2002       24.63%       117,746     $ 417,034     $ 3.54       100%  
31   Louisville, KY   4601 Outler Loop Rd.   40219     SC       Fee       1973       2002       24.63%       49,410     $ 293,468     $ 5.94       100%  
32   Owensboro, KY   4810 Frederica Street   42301     SC       Fee       1984       2002       24.63%       49,980     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
33   Paducah, KY   5109 Hinkleville Road   42001     SC       Fee       1984       2002       24.63%       52,500     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
    Louisiana                                                                                
   
                                                                               
34   Baton Rouge, LA (Fee)   9501 Cortana Mall   70815     SC       Fee       1977       2004       24.63%       90,000     $ 148,900     $ 1.65       100%  
35   Bossier City, LA   2950 East Texas Street   71111     SC       Fee       1982       2002       24.63%       58,500     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
36   Houma, LA   1636 Martin Luther King Blvd.   70360     SC       Fee       1992       2002       24.63%       49,721     $ 324,689     $ 8.12       80.4%  
37   Metairie, LA   6851 Veterans Blvd.   70003     SC       Fee       1972       2002       24.63%       92,992     $ 1,000,611     $ 10.76       100%  
    Maine                                                                                
   
                                                                               
38   Augusta, ME   Capitol Plaza
114 Western Avenue
  04330     SC       Lease       1983       2002       24.63%       52,635     $ 120,000     $ 6.00       38%  
    Massachusetts                                                                                
   
                                                                               
39   Burlington, MA   34 Cambridge Street   01803     SC       Lease       1978       2002       24.63%       70,800     $ 898,814     $ 12.70       100%  
40   Swansea, MA   58 Swansea Mall Drive   02777     SC       GL       1985       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 119,880     $ 6.00       40%  
    Michigan                                                                                
   
                                                                               
41   Westland, MI   7368 Nankin Road   48185     SC       Fee       1980       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
    Mississippi                                                                                
   
                                                                               
42   Hattiesburg, MS   1000 Turtle Creek Drive
Suite 2
  39402     SC       Fee       1995       2002       24.63%       50,809     $ 406,472     $ 8.00       100%  
    Nevada                                                                                
   
                                                                               
43   Las Vegas, NV   4701 Faircenter Parkway   89102     LH       Lease       1990       2002       24.63%       24,925     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
    New Hampshire                                                                                
   
                                                                               
44   Salem, NH   271 South Broadway   03079     LH       Lease       1985       2002       24.63%       50,110     $ 574,539     $ 11.47       100%  
    New Jersey                                                                                
   
                                                                               
45   Paramus, NJ   Bishops Corner East 651
Route 17 South
  06117     LH       Lease       1978       2002       24.63%       54,850     $ 898,563     $ 18.29       89.6%  
46   Wayne, NJ   Rt. 23 West Belt Plaza   07470     LH       Lease       1978       2002       24.63%       49,157     $ 756,173     $ 15.38       100%  
    New York                                                                                
   
                                                                               
47   Middletown, NY   88-25 Dunning Rd.   10940     LH       Lease       1989       2002       24.63%       50,144     $ 409,649     $ 8.17       100%  
    North Carolina                                                                                
   
                                                                               
48   Raleigh, NC   U.S. 17 Millbrook   27604     SC       Fee       1994       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 436,439     $ 8.73       100%  
    Oklahoma                                                                                
   
                                                                               
49   Warr Acres, OK   5537 North West Expressway   73132     SC       Fee       1985       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
    Pennsylvania                                                                                
   
                                                                               
50   Wilkes-Barre, PA   520 Kidder Street   18702     SC       Fee       1995       2002       24.63%       65,000     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  

47


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Service Merchandise Property List at December 31, 2004
                                                                                     
Company-
Owned
Type of DDR Gross Total Average
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership Leasable Annualized Base Rent Percent
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest Area (SF) Base Rent (Per SF) (2) Leased












    South Carolina                                                                                
   
                                                                               
51   North Charleston, SC   7400 Rivers Avenue   29418     SC       Fee       1989       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 308,613     $ 6.17       100%  
    Tennessee                                                                                
   
                                                                               
52   Antioch, TN   5301 Hickory Hollow Pkwy.   37013     SC       Fee       1984       2002       24.63%       59,319     $ 554,768     $ 9.35       100%  
53   Franklin, TN   1735 Galleria Blvd.   37064     SC       Fee       1992       2002       24.63%       60,000     $ 683,409     $ 11.39       100%  
54   Knoxville, TN   9333 Kingston Pike   37922     SC       Fee       1986       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
    Texas                                                                                
   
                                                                               
55   Arlington, TX   1530 West I-20   76017     SC       GL       1994       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 412,500     $ 8.25       100%  
56   Baytown, TX   6731 Garth Road   77521     SC       Fee       1981       2002       24.63%       52,288     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
57   Beaumont, TX   4450 Dowlen   77706     LH       Lease       1977       2002       24.63%       63,404     $ 310,867     $ 4.90       100%  
58   Longview, TX   3520 McCann Road   75605     LH       Lease       1978       2002       24.63%       40,524     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
59   McAllen, TX   6600 U.S. Expressway 83   78503     SC       Fee       1993       2002       24.63%       59,086     $ 431,230     $ 7.96       91.6%  
60   Richardson, TX   1300 East Beltline   75081     SC       Fee       1978       2002       24.63%       62,463     $ 454,600     $ 7.28       100%  
61   Sugar Land, TX   15235 South West Freeway   77478     SC       GL       1992       2002       24.63%       50,000     $ 325,000     $ 6.50       100%  
62   Tyler, TX   4820 South Broadway Blvd.   75703     LH       Lease       1977       2002       24.63%       62,101     $ 255,343     $ 10.54       39%  
    Virginia                                                                                
   
                                                                               
63   Chesapeake, VA   4300 Portsmouth Blvd.   23321     SC       GL       1990       2002       24.63%       50,062     $ 364,093     $ 7.27       100%  


* Asset Designation Rights

(1)  “SC” indicates a power center or a community shopping center.
 
(2)  Calculated as total annualized base rentals divided by Company-owned GLA actually leased as of December 31, 2004

48


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation

Office and Industrial Property List as of December 31, 2004
                                                                                     
Company-
Owned
Type of DDR Gross Total Average
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership Leasable Annualized Base Rent Percent
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest Area (SF) Base Rent (Per SF) (2) Leased












    Arizona                                                                                
   
                                                                               
1
  Gateway West   Gateway West - Building A
3838 East Van Buren Street
  85038     OFF       Fee       1974       2001       100%       155,587     $ 2,385,786     $ 18.55       82.6%  
2
  Washington Business   Washington Business - A
5324 East Washington Street
  85054     IND       Fee       1985       2001       100%       137,121     $ 758,954     $ 9.91       55.8%  
    Florida                                                                                
   
                                                                               
3
  Winter Park   Winter Park - Phase I
801 S. Orlando Avenue
  32792     IND       Fee       1985       2001       100%       119,884     $ 871,214     $ 10.31       70.5%  
    Maryland                                                                                
   
                                                                               
4
  Silver Spring, MD   Tech Center 29 Phase I
2120-2162 Tech Road
  20904     IND       Fee       1970       2001       100%       176,674     $ 1,268,004     $ 9.10       78.8%  
5
  Silver Springs, MD   Tech Center 29 Phase II
2180 Industrial Parkway
  20904     IND       Fee       1991       2001       100%       58,280     $ 721,967     $ 14.67       84.4%  
6
  Silver Springs, MD   Tech Center 29 Phase III 12200 Tech Road   20904     OFF       Fee       1988       2001       100%       55,901     $ 816,543     $ 20.45       71.4%  
    Massachusetts                                                                                
   
                                                                               
7
  Chelmsford, MA   Apollo Drive Office Building 300 Apollo Drive   01824     OFF       Fee       1987       2001       55.84%       291,424     $ 3,943,084     $ 13.53       100%  
    Missouri                                                                                
   
                                                                               
8
  St. Louis, MO   1881 Pine Street   63103     OFF       Fee       1987       2001       100%       107,548     $ 1,507,818     $ 15.31       91.6%  
    Ohio                                                                                
   
                                                                               
9
  Twinsburg, OH   Heritage Business I
9177 Dutton Drive
  44087     IND       Fee       1990       3*       100%       36,160     $ 38,406     $ 7.11       14.9%  
    Pennsylvania                                                                                
   
                                                                               
10
  Erie, PA   38th Street Plaza
2301 West 38th Street
  16506     IND       GL       1973       2*       100%       96,000     $ 291,520     $ 5.34       56.9%  
    Texas                                                                                
   
                                                                               
11
  Arlington, TX   Meridian Street Warehouse
2019-25 Meridian Street
  76011     IND       Fee       1981       2001       100%       72,072     $ 0     $ 0.00       0%  
12
  Beltline Business Center   Beltline Bus Ctr
6210 Beltline Road
  75063     IND       Fee       1984       2001       100%       60,245     $ 319,910     $ 9.56       55.6%  
13
  Carrollton, TX   Valwood II Bus Ctr
2210 Hutton Dr.
  75006     IND       Fee       1984       2001       100%       52,452     $ 197,940     $ 5.13       73.6%  
14
  Commerce Center   Commerce Center - Bldg #1
9000 Southwest Freeway
  77074     IND       Fee       1974       2001       100%       296,400     $ 1,244,999     $ 5.55       75.7%  
15
  Commerce Park North   Commerce Park North 70
15621 Blue Ash Drive
  77090     IND       Fee       1984       2001       100%       88,314     $ 436,820     $ 6.49       76.2%  
16
  D/ FW North   D/FW North - 1
1702 Old Minter’s Chapel Rd.
  76051     IND       Fee       1985       2001       100%       74,704     $ 305,295     $ 4.90       83.4%  

49


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Office and Industrial Property List as of December 31, 2004
                                                                                     
Company-
Owned
Type of DDR Gross Total Average
Zip Property Ownership Year Year Ownership Leasable Annualized Base Rent Percent
Center/Property Location Code (1) Interest Developed Acquired Interest Area (SF) Base Rent (Per SF) (2) Leased












17
  Dallas, TX   Carpenter Center
8701 Carpenter Freeway
  75247     IND       Fee       1983       2001       100%       46,473     $ 231,878     $ 5.37       92.9%  
18
  Gateway   Gateway - 5
6025 Commerce Drive
  75063     IND       Fee       1985       2001       100%       79,029     $ 460,424     $ 6.86       85%  
19
  Grand Prairie, TX   Carrier Place
1517 W. North Carrier
  75050     IND       Fee       1984       2001       100%       83,520     $ 275,545     $ 5.79       57%  
20
  Northgate II   Northgate II-5
10305-10345 Brockwood
  75238     IND       Fee       1983       2001       100%       237,063     $ 569,275     $ 3.96       60.7%  
21
  Northgate III   Northgate III
11901-45 Forestgate Drive
  75243     IND       Fee       1980       2001       100%       257,289     $ 552,366     $ 5.74       37.4%  
22
  Plano, TX   Parkway Tech Center 1825 E. Plano Parkway   75074     IND       Fee       1984       2001       100%       69,547     $ 386,249     $ 6.36       87.3%  
23
  Plaza Southwest   Plaza Southwest - Bldg #1
7302 Harwin
  77036     IND       Fee       1975       2001       100%       151,898     $ 710,099     $ 5.44       86%  
24
  Shady Trail Business Center   Shady Trail Bus Ctr - 1
11056 Shady Trail
  75229     IND       Fee       1984       2001       100%       68,043     $ 229,826     $ 4.10       82.4%  
25
  Technipark Ten Service Ctr   Technipark Ten Service Ctr #3 16155 Park Row   77084     IND       Fee       1984       2001       100%       71,647     $ 270,269     $ 6.29       59.9%  
26
  Valley View Com Pk   Valley View Com Pk - 1
12901 Hutton
  75234     IND       Fee       1986       2001       100%       139,398     $ 716,871     $ 8.22       62.5%  
27
  Westchase Park   Westchase Park 1-2 200
3130 Rogerdale Road
  77042     IND       Fee       1984       2001       100%       47,702     $ 329,365     $ 7.27       95%  
    Utah                                                                                
   
                                                                               
28
  Salt Lake City, UT
(Hermes)
  The Hermes Building
455 East 500 South Street
  84111     IND       Fee       1985       1998       100%       53,476     $ 659,615     $ 14.48       85.2%  
    Virginia                                                                                
   
                                                                               
29
  Chesapeake, VA   Greenbrier Technology Ctr
814 Greenbrier Circle
  2332024     63 IND       Fee       1981       2001       100%       95,458     $ 595,160     $ 7.85       79.4%  
30
  Greenbrier Circle Ctr   Greenbrier Circle Corp II
1801 Sara Drive
  23320     IND       Fee       1981       2001       100%       230,097     $ 2,203,095     $ 11.60       82.5%  
31
  Norfolk Commerce Center   Norfolk Commerce Center - 1 5505 Robin Hood Road   23513     IND       GL       1981       2001       100%       328,316     $ 2,900,861     $ 10.18       86.8%  
    Wisconsin                                                                                
   
                                                                               
32
  Northwest Business Park   Northwest Business Park - 1
N56 W 13365-13405 Silver
Spring
  53051     IND       Fee       1986       2001       100%       143,114       627,271     $ 6.51       67.4%  


2*  Original IPO Property
 
3*  Original IPO Property Transferred to American Industrial Properties (“AIP”) in 1998 and reacquired in 2001 through AIP merger.

(1)  These properties are classified as the Company’s business center segment. “OFF” indicates office property and “IND” indicates industrial property
 
(2)  Calculated as total annualized base rentals divided by Company-owned GLA actually leased as of December 31, 2004.

50


Table of Contents

Item 3.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

      Other than routine litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, the Company is not presently involved in any litigation nor, to its knowledge, is any litigation threatened against the Company or its properties, which is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the liquidity or results of operations of the Company.

Item 4.     SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

      No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

      Pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K, the following information is reported below.

      (a) The executive officers of the Company are as follows:

             
Name Age Position and Office with the Company



Scott A. Wolstein
    52     Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
David M. Jacobstein
    58     President and Chief Operating Officer
Daniel B. Hurwitz
    40     Executive Vice President
Joan U. Allgood
    52     Senior Vice President — Corporate Affairs and Governance and Secretary
Richard E. Brown
    53     Senior Vice President of Real Estate Operations
Timothy J. Bruce
    47     Senior Vice President of Development
William H. Schafer
    46     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

      Scott A. Wolstein has been the Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company since its organization in 1992. Mr. Wolstein has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company since May 1997. Prior to the organization of the Company, Mr. Wolstein was a principal and executive officer of Developers Diversified Group (“DDG”), the Company’s predecessor. Mr. Wolstein is a graduate of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Michigan Law School. Following law school, Mr. Wolstein was associated with the law firm of Thompson, Hine & Flory. He is currently a member of the board of NAREIT, the International Council of Shopping Centers (“ICSC”), The Real Estate Roundtable, the Zell-Lurie Wharton Real Estate Center, The Greater Cleveland Partnership, Hathaway Brown School, The Red Cross and the Cleveland Development Advisory Board. He is also a current member of the Urban Land Institute, PREA, The Visiting Committee to Case Western Reserve University’s Weatherhead School, The World’s President Organization and the Anti-Defamation League. He has also served as Chairman of the State of Israel Bonds, Ohio Chapter and President of the Board of Trustees of the United Cerebral Palsy Association of Greater Cleveland and as a member of the Board of the Great Lakes Theater Festival, The Park Synagogue and the Convention and Visitors Bureau of Greater Cleveland. Mr. Wolstein is a four-time recipient of the Realty Stock Review’s Outstanding CEO Award.

      David M. Jacobstein has been the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company since May 1999 and was a Director of the Company from May 2000 to May 2004. From 1986 until the time he joined the Company, Mr. Jacobstein was employed by Wilmorite, Inc., a Rochester, New York based shopping center developer where most recently he served as Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Jacobstein is a graduate of Colgate University and George Washington University Law School. Prior to joining Wilmorite, Mr. Jacobstein practiced law with the firms of Thompson, Hine & Flory in Cleveland, Ohio and Harris, Beach & Wilcox in Rochester, New York, where he specialized in corporate and securities law. Mr. Jacobstein is a member of ICSC and ULI and has served as President of the Allendale Columbia School Board of Trustees (Rochester, New York) and as a Board member and officer of the Colgate University Alumni Corporation.

      Daniel B. Hurwitz was appointed Executive Vice President in June 1999 and was a Director of the Company from May 2002 to May 2004. Mr. Hurwitz previously served as Senior Vice President and Director of Real Estate and Development for Reading, Pennsylvania based Boscov’s Department Store, Inc., a privately held department store chain, from 1991 until he joined the Company. Prior to Boscov’s, Mr. Hurwitz served as Development

51


Table of Contents

Director for The Shopco Group, a New York City based developer of regional shopping malls. Mr. Hurwitz is a graduate of Colgate University, and the Wharton School of Business Executive Management Program at the University of Pennsylvania. He is a member of the ICSC, ULI, and Applewood Centers Inc., and has served as a Board member of the Colgate University Alumni Corporation, Reading JCC, American Cancer Society (Regional), The Children’s Museum of Cleveland, and the Greater Berk’s Food Bank.

      Joan U. Allgood is Senior Vice President — Corporate Affairs and Governance at the Company. Mrs. Allgood also serves as Corporate Secretary. Mrs. Allgood was the Company’s Vice President and General Counsel from 1993 when the Company was organized as a public company until 2003, and was General Counsel of its predecessor entities since 1987. She was promoted to Senior Vice President in 1999. Mrs. Allgood is a member of ICSC, the American College of Real Estate Lawyers and the Ohio and Cleveland Bar Associations. She received her B.A. from Denison University, Granville, Ohio and her J.D. from Case Western Reserve University School of Law in 1977.

      Richard Brown has been Senior Vice President of Real Estate Operations since March 2002, Senior Vice President of Asset Management and Operations from February 2001 to March 2002 and Vice President of Asset Management and Operations from January 2000 to February 2001. From June 1996 to December 1999, Mr. Brown was Vice President of Asset Management of PREIT-Rubin, Inc., located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and from February 1987 to May 1996 was Vice President of Retail Asset Management of the Balcor Company, in Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Brown is a Canadian chartered accountant and received his Bachelor of Commerce from Carleton University, in Ottawa, Canada.

      Tim Bruce was appointed Senior Vice President of the Company in September 2002. Mr. Bruce oversees the development department for DDR’s nationwide retail real estate portfolio. From 1988 to the time he joined DDR, Mr. Bruce, a 15-year shopping center industry veteran, served as Senior Vice President, Director of Leasing for Acadia Realty Trust in New York, where his responsibilities included all aspects of leasing and redevelopment of Acadia’s 10 million square foot portfolio of community and neighborhood shopping centers. Mr. Bruce earned his BA from the School of Architecture at the University of Illinois at Chicago and a Masters of Management from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Business at Northwestern University. Mr. Bruce is a member of ICSC.

      William H. Schafer has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company since May 1999, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from its organization as a public company in 1993 and the Chief Financial Officer of its predecessor entities from April 1992. Mr. Schafer joined the Cleveland, Ohio office of the Price Waterhouse LLP accounting firm in 1983 and served there as a Senior Manager from July 1990 until he joined the Company’s predecessors in 1992. Mr. Schafer graduated from the University of Michigan with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration. Mr. Schafer is a member of ICSC and serves as director for The Gathering Place, a not-for-profit organization.

52


Table of Contents

PART II

 
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

      The high and low sale prices per share of the Company’s common shares, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) composite tape, and declared dividends per share for the quarterly periods indicated were as follows:

                           
High Low Dividends



2004:
                       
 
First
  $ 40.89     $ 32.26     $ 0.46  
 
Second
    42.55       30.80       0.46  
 
Third
    39.15       35.09       0.51  
 
Fourth
    45.85       39.05       0.51  
2003:
                       
 
First
  $ 24.65     $ 21.22     $ 0.41  
 
Second
    29.62       24.15       0.41  
 
Third
    30.25       28.00       0.41  
 
Fourth
    33.90       28.23       0.46  

      As of February 28, 2005, there were approximately 2,800 record holders and approximately 34,000 beneficial owners of the Company’s common shares.

      In February 2005, the Company declared its 2005 first quarter dividend to shareholders of record on March 21, 2005 of $0.54 per share.

      The Company intends to continue to declare quarterly dividends on its common shares. However, no assurances can be made as to the amounts of future dividends, since such dividends are subject to the Company’s cash flow from operations, earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors considers relevant. The Company is required by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, to distribute at least 90% of its REIT taxable income. The amount of cash available for dividends is impacted by capital expenditures and debt service requirements to the extent that the Company were to fund such items out of cash flow from operations.

      In June 1995, the Company implemented a dividend reinvestment plan under which shareholders may elect to reinvest their dividends automatically in common shares. Under the plan, the Company may, from time to time, elect to purchase common shares in the open market on behalf of participating shareholders or may issue new common shares to such shareholders.

      The Company does not currently have in effect a plan to repurchase its common shares in the open market. The shares reflected in the following table, reflect shares surrendered to the Company to pay the exercise price of options.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

                                   
(d) Maximum
Number (or
Approximate Dollar
(c) Total Number of Value) of Shares
Shares Purchased that May Yet Be
(a) Total Number as Part of Publicly Purchased Under
of Shares (b) Average Price Announced Plans the Plans or
Purchased Paid per Share or Programs Programs




October 1 – 31, 2004
    161,869     $ 40.19              
November 1 – 30, 2004
                       
December 1 – 31, 2004
                       
     
                         
 
Total
    161,869                          

53


Table of Contents

 
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

      The financial data included in the following table has been derived from the financial statements for the last five years and includes the information required by Item 301 of Regulation S-K.

COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
                                             
For the Years Ended December 31,

2004(1) 2003(1) 2002(1) 2001(1) 2000(1)





Operating Data:
                                       
Revenues (primarily real estate rentals)
  $ 598,933     $ 465,732     $ 346,701     $ 305,734     $ 276,208  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                                       
 
Rental operation
    196,740       158,986       114,094       92,694       80,015  
 
Depreciation & amortization
    131,577       93,155       76,155       62,389       52,431  
 
Impairment charge
                      2,895        
     
     
     
     
     
 
      328,317       252,141       190,249       157,978       132,446  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Interest income
    4,235       5,082       5,905       6,425       4,333  
 
Interest expense
    (129,659 )     (88,837 )     (75,754 )     (79,819 )     (75,274 )
 
Other expense
    (1,779 )     (10,119 )     (1,018 )           (646 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
      (127,203 )     (93,874 )     (70,867 )     (73,394 )     (71,587 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income before equity in net income from joint ventures, gain on sale of joint venture interests, minority equity investments, minority interests, discontinued operations, gain on sales of real estate and income tax of taxable REIT subsidiaries and franchise taxes
    143,413       119,717       85,585       74,362       72,175  
Equity in net income from joint ventures
    40,895       44,967       32,769       17,010       17,072  
Gain on sale of joint venture interests
          7,950                    
Equity in net income from minority equity investment
                      1,550       6,224  
Minority interests
    (5,013 )     (5,365 )     (21,570 )     (21,502 )     (19,593 )
Income tax of taxable REIT subsidiaries and franchise taxes
    (1,469 )     (1,626 )     (742 )     (803 )     (675 )
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations
    177,826       165,643       96,042       70,617       75,203  
Discontinued operations:
                                       
   
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
    1,734       226       (1,777 )     3,458       2,190  
   
Gain on disposition sale of real estate, net
    8,561       460       4,276             952  
     
     
     
     
     
 
      10,295       686       2,499       3,458       3,142  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income before gain on disposition of real estate
    188,121       166,329       98,541       74,075       78,345  
Gain on sales of real estate
    84,642       73,932       3,429       18,297       22,488  
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (3,001 )                        
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income
  $ 269,762     $ 240,261     $ 101,970     $ 92,372     $ 100,833  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 219,056     $ 189,056     $ 69,368     $ 65,110     $ 73,571  
     
     
     
     
     
 

54


Table of Contents

                                           
For the Years Ended December 31,

2004(1) 2003(1) 2002(1) 2001(1) 2000(1)





Earnings per share data — Basic:
                                       
 
Income from continuing operations
  $ 2.19     $ 2.30     $ 1.05     $ 1.12     $ 1.25  
 
Income from discontinued operations
    0.11       0.01       0.04       0.06       0.06  
 
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (0.03 )                        
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.27     $ 2.31     $ 1.09     $ 1.18     $ 1.31  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Weighted average number of common shares
    96,638       81,903       63,807       55,186       55,959  
Earnings per share data — Diluted:
                                       
 
Income from continuing operations
  $ 2.17     $ 2.26     $ 1.03     $ 1.11     $ 1.25  
 
Income from discontinued operations
    0.10       0.01       0.04       0.06       0.06  
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (0.03 )                        
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.24     $ 2.27     $ 1.07     $ 1.17     $ 1.31  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Weighted average number of common shares
    99,024       84,188       64,837       55,834       56,176  
 
Dividends declared (per share)
  $ 1.94     $ 1.69     $ 1.52     $ 1.48     $ 1.44  
                                         
At December 31,

2004 2003 2002 2001 2000





Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Real estate (at cost)
  $ 5,603,424     $ 3,884,911     $ 2,804,056     $ 2,493,665     $ 2,161,810  
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
    5,035,193       3,426,698       2,395,264       2,141,956       1,864,563  
Advances to and investment in joint ventures
    288,020       260,143       258,610       255,565       260,927  
Total assets
    5,583,547       3,941,151       2,776,852       2,497,207       2,332,021  
Total debt
    2,718,690       2,083,131       1,498,798       1,308,301       1,227,575  
Shareholders’ equity
    2,554,319       1,614,070       945,561       834,014       783,750  

55


Table of Contents

                                           
For the Years Ended December 31,

2004(1) 2003(1) 2002(1) 2001(1) 2000(1)





Cash Flow Data:
                                       
Cash flow provided by (used for):
                                       
 
Operating activities
  $ 292,226     $ 263,129     $ 210,739     $ 174,326     $ 146,272  
 
Investing activities
    (1,134,601 )     (16,246 )     (279,997 )     (37,982 )     (20,579 )
 
Financing activities
    880,553       (251,561 )     66,560       (121,518 )     (127,442 )
Other Data:
                                       
Funds from operations (2):
                                       
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 219,056     $ 189,056     $ 69,368     $ 65,110     $ 73,571  
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments
    130,536       93,174       76,462       63,200       52,974  
Equity in net income from joint ventures
    (40,895 )     (44,967 )     (32,769 )     (17,010 )     (17,072 )
Gain on sale of joint venture interests
          (7,950 )                  
Joint ventures’ funds from operations
    46,209       47,942       44,473       31,546       30,512  
Equity in net income from minority equity investment
                      (1,550 )     (6,224 )
Minority equity investment funds from operations
                      6,448       14,856  
Minority equity interests (OP Units)
    2,607       1,769       1,450       1,531       4,126  
Gain on sales of depreciable real estate investments, net
    (68,179 )     (67,352 )     (4,276 )     (16,688 )     (23,440 )
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting standard
    3,001                          
     
     
     
     
     
 
Funds from operations available to common shareholders
    292,335       211,672       154,708       132,587       129,303  
Preferred dividends
    50,706       51,205       32,602       27,262       27,262  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Funds from operations
  $ 343,041     $ 262,877     $ 187,310     $ 159,849     $ 156,565  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Weighted average shares and OP Units (Diluted) (3)
    99,147       84,319       65,910       56,957       59,037  


(1)  As described in the notes to consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired 112 properties in 2004 (18 of which were acquired through joint ventures and one of which the Company acquired its joint venture partner’s interest), 124 properties in 2003 (three of which are owned through joint ventures), 11 properties in 2002 (four of which the Company acquired its joint venture partners’ interest), eight properties in 2001 (all of which are owned through joint ventures), and three properties in 2000 (two of which are owned through joint ventures). In addition, in conjunction with the AIP merger in May 2001, the Company obtained ownership of 39 properties. The Company sold/transferred 28 properties in 2004 (13 of which were owned through joint ventures), 38 properties in 2003 (12 of which were owned through joint ventures), 15 properties in 2002 (six of which were owned through joint ventures), ten properties in 2001 (three of which were owned through joint ventures) and 9 properties and 3 Wal-Marts in 2000 (six of which were owned through joint ventures). All amounts have been presented to reflect the Company’s adoption of SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2002 as appropriate. In accordance with that standard, long-lived assets that were sold or are classified as held for sale as a result of disposal activities initiated subsequent to December 31, 2001 have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
 
(2)  Management believes that Funds From Operations (“FFO”), which is a non-GAAP financial measure, provides an additional and useful means to assess the financial performance of a REIT. It is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate the performance of REITs, most of which present FFO along with net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP. FFO available to common shareholders is generally defined and calculated by the Company as net income, adjusted to exclude: (i) preferred dividends, (ii) gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable real estate property, except for those sold through the Company’s merchant building program, which are

56


Table of Contents

presented net of taxes, (iii) sales of securities, (iv) extraordinary items and (v) certain non-cash items. These non-cash items principally include real property depreciation, equity income from joint ventures and equity income from minority equity investments and adding the Company’s proportionate share of FFO from its unconsolidated joint ventures and minority equity investments, determined on a consistent basis. Management believes that FFO provides the Company and investors with an important indicator of the Company’s operating performance. This measure of performance is used by the Company for several business purposes and for REITs it provides a recognized measure of performance other than GAAP net income, which may include non-cash items (often large). Other real estate companies may calculate FFO in a different manner.
 
(3)  Represents weighted average shares and operating partnership units, or OP Units, at the end of the respective period.

57


Table of Contents

 
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

      The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, the notes thereto and the comparative summary of selected financial data appearing elsewhere in this report. Historical results and percentage relationships set forth in the consolidated financial statements, including trends which might appear, should not be taken as indicative of future operations. The Company considers portions of this information to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, both as amended, with respect to the Company’s expectations for future periods. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements related to acquisitions (including any related pro forma financial information) and other business development activities, future capital expenditures, financing sources and availability and the effects of environmental and other regulations. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact should be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Readers should exercise caution in interpreting and relying on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond the Company’s control and could materially affect the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements.

      Factors that could cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

  •  The Company is subject to general risks affecting the real estate industry, including the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms to generate rental revenues;
 
  •  The Company could be adversely affected by changes in the local markets where its properties are located, as well as by adverse changes in national economic and market conditions;
 
  •  The Company is subject to competition for tenants from other owners of retail properties and its tenants are subject to competition from other retailers and methods of distribution. The Company is dependent upon the successful operations and financial condition of its tenants, in particular certain of its major tenants, and could be adversely affected by the bankruptcy of those tenants;
 
  •  The Company may not realize the intended benefits of an acquisition transaction. The assets may not perform as well as the Company anticipated or the Company may not successfully integrate the assets and realize the improvements in occupancy and operating results that the Company anticipates. The acquisition of certain assets may subject the Company to liabilities, including environmental liabilities;
 
  •  The Company will be subject to Puerto Rican laws governing certain properties acquired in 2005, with which the Company has no prior experience;
 
  •  The Company may fail to identify, acquire, construct or develop additional properties that produce a desired yield on invested capital, or may fail to effectively integrate acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties;
 
  •  The Company may abandon a development opportunity after expending resources if it determines that the development opportunity is not feasible or if it is unable to obtain all necessary zoning and other required governmental permits and authorizations;
 
  •  The Company may not complete projects on schedule as a result of various factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, such as weather, labor conditions and material shortages, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs and decreases in revenue;
 
  •  Debt and/or equity financing necessary for the Company to continue to grow and operate its business may not be available or may not be available on favorable terms;

58


Table of Contents

  •  The Company is subject to complex regulations related to its status as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and would be adversely affected if it failed to qualify as a REIT;
 
  •  Partnership or joint venture investments may involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by the Company, including the possibility that the Company’s partner or co-venturer might become bankrupt, that the Company’s partner or co-venturer might at any time have different interests or goals than does the Company and that the Company’s partner or co-venturer may take action contrary to the Company’s instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including the Company’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT;
 
  •  The Company must make distributions to shareholders to continue to qualify as a REIT, and if the Company borrows funds to make distributions then those borrowings may not be available on favorable terms;
 
  •  The Company may fail to anticipate the effects on its properties of changes in consumer buying practices, including sales over the Internet, and the resulting retailing practices and space needs of its tenants;
 
  •  The Company is subject to potential environmental liabilities;
 
  •  The Company could be adversely affected by changes in government regulations, including changes in environmental, zoning, tax and other regulations and
 
  •  Changes in interest rates could adversely affect the market price for the Company’s common shares, as well as its performance and cash flow.

Executive Summary

      The Company strives to be the leading owner, developer and manager of market-dominant community shopping centers that provide the very best environments for the nation’s most successful retailers, which can offer customers the most convenient shopping experience at an affordable cost. The Company’s investment strategy is to own and operate market-dominant community centers that draw shoppers from the immediate neighborhood as well as the surrounding trade area. These properties typically have the following characteristics:

  •  250,000-1,000,000 square foot, open-air shopping centers;
 
  •  Two or more strong national tenant anchors such as Wal-Mart, Kohl’s, Target, Home Depot or Lowe’s Home Improvement;
 
  •  Two or more medium-sized national big-box tenants such as Best Buy, Bed Bath & Beyond, TJ Maxx or Michaels;
 
  •  20,000-80,000 square feet of small shops and
 
  •  Two to four outparcels available for sale or ground lease.

      We believe the Company is well positioned to benefit from long-term trends in the retail industry, as retail sales have steadily grown over the past 11 years, with a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 4%.

59


Table of Contents

GROWTH IN RETAIL SALES

(excluding Automobiles)

Over the last 11 years, retail sales have grown over 70%,

at a compound annual growth rate of approximately 4%

LOGO

Source: U.S. Census, Property & Portfolio Research.

60


Table of Contents

      In addition, there has been a continuing move in sales from traditional department stores, enclosed mall anchors and specialty tenants and neighborhood groceries to discount department stores, open-air community shopping center discounters and super centers. Discount retailers are capturing market share at the expense of traditional department stores.

SHIFT TO DISCOUNT RETAILERS

Discount retailers capture market share at the expense of traditional department stores

LOGO

      As a result, traditional department stores continue to migrate to the Company’s community shopping center format including:

  Sears (Minneapolis, Minnesota)
 
  May Company dba Meier & Frank (Salt Lake City, Utah)
 
  JC Penney (Minneapolis, Minnesota)
 
  Dillard’s (Kansas City, Missouri)
 
  Macy’s (Pasadena, California)
 
  May Company dba Jones Department Store (Leawood, Kansas)

        In line retailers traditionally found in enclosed malls are also now seeking locations at the Company’s open-air community centers such as:

     
Aeropostale
  Lane Bryant
Ann Taylor
  Liz Claiborne
August Max
  Maurice’s
The Bombay Company
  Motherhood Maternity
C.J. Banks
  Pacific Sunwear
Casual Corner
  Petite Sophisticate
Children’s Place
  Sephora
Christopher Banks
  Sterling Jewelry
EB Gameworld
  Williams Sonoma/ Pottery Barn
Gamestop
  Wilson’s Leather
The Gap
  Yankee Candle
Justice
  Zales

61


Table of Contents

      The following table sets forth, at December 31, 2004, information as to anchor and/ or national retail tenants which individually accounted for at least 1.0% of total annualized base rent of the wholly-owned properties and the Company’s proportionate share of joint venture properties:

                 
% of Total % of Total
Shopping Center Shopping Center
Tenant Base Rent GLA



Wal-Mart
    4.4 %     6.9 %
Tops
    3.5 %     2.9 %
PETsMART
    2.5 %     1.9 %
T.J. Maxx/ Marshalls
    2.4 %     2.7 %
Kohl’s
    2.3 %     2.7 %
Bed Bath & Beyond
    2.2 %     1.7 %
Lowe’s Home Improvement Warehouse
    2.0 %     2.7 %
Michaels
    1.6 %     1.3 %
Home Depot
    1.5 %     1.8 %
OfficeMax
    1.5 %     1.4 %
Barnes & Noble
    1.4 %     0.8 %
The Gap/ Old Navy
    1.3 %     0.8 %
Best Buy
    1.2 %     0.9 %
Linens ’N Things
    1.2 %     0.8 %
Toys “R” Us
    1.1 %     1.4 %
Ross Dress for Less
    1.1 %     1.0 %
Staples
    1.0 %     0.9 %
AMC Theatres
    1.0 %     0.4 %
Dollar Tree
    1.0 %     1.0 %
Office Depot
    1.0 %     1.0 %
Dick’s Sporting Goods
    1.0 %     0.9 %

62


Table of Contents

      The following table sets forth, at December 31, 2004, information as to anchor and/or national retail tenants which individually accounted for at least 1.0% of total annualized base rent of the wholly-owned properties and the Company’s joint venture properties:

                                 
Wholly-owned Properties Joint Venture Properties


% of
Shopping % of % of % of
Center Company- Shopping Company-
Base owned Center Base owned
Rental Shopping Rental Shopping
Tenant Revenues Center GLA Revenues Center GLA





Wal-Mart
    5.0%       7.8%       2.9%       4.6%  
Tops
    3.8%       3.1%       3.8%       4.4%  
Kohl’s
    2.3%       2.8%       2.7%       4.1%  
Lowe’s Home Improvement
    2.3%       3.2%       0.7%       1.1%  
PETsMART
    2.2%       1.6%       2.0%       1.9%  
T. J. Maxx/ Marshalls
    2.1%       2.5%       2.6%       3.0%  
Bed Bath & Beyond
    1.9%       1.5%       1.9%       1.9%  
Home Depot
    1.8%       2.0%       0.8%       0.8%  
OfficeMax
    1.5%       1.4%       1.8%       1.8%  
Michaels
    1.4%       1.1%       1.4%       1.4%  
Barnes & Noble/ B. Dalton
    1.3%       0.7%       2.3%       1.5%  
The Gap/ Old Navy
    1.3%       0.8%       1.4%       0.9%  
Linens ’N Things
    1.2%       0.7%       1.4%       1.3%  
Best Buy
    1.2%       0.9%       1.4%       1.3%  
Dollar Tree
    1.1%       1.1%       0.6%       0.8%  
Dick’s Sporting Goods
    1.1%       0.9%       1.2%       1.2%  
Toys “R” Us
    1.1%       1.3%       0.9%       1.4%  
Cinemark Theatres
    1.0%       0.6%       0.6%       0.5%  
Staples
    1.0%       0.9%       0.6%       0.6%  
Ross Dress for Less
    1.0%       0.9%       1.9%       2.1%  
Regal Cinemas
    1.0%       0.6%       0.3%       0.5%  
Office Depot
    1.0%       1.0%       0.8%       0.8%  
Sports Authority
    1.0%       0.7%       0.6%       0.4%  
Goody’s
    0.9%       1.1%       0.2%       0.3%  
Circuit City
    0.8%       0.6%       1.7%       1.6%  
AMC Theatres
    0.7%       0.2%       1.7%       1.4%  
Kroger
    0.7%       1.2%       1.2%       1.8%  
Pier 1 Imports
    0.6%       0.3%       1.0%       0.6%  
Jo-Ann Fabrics
    0.9%       0.9%       1.0%       1.1%  
Famous Footwear
    0.6%       0.3%       1.0%       0.7%  

63


Table of Contents

      Shopping center tenants are expected to achieve an average growth, in square feet, of 7% in 2004 and 2005 according to Goldman Sachs, October 7, 2004. These tenants include supermarkets, drug stores, hardline retail and discount stores. The top 10 U.S. retailers by estimated growth are well positioned in the Company’s portfolio. These tenants include the following:

     
Wal-Mart
  Walgreen’s
Lowe’s
  Kroger
Home Depot
  Costco
Target
  Albertson’s
Kohl’s
  Safeway

      At December 31, 2004, the Company’s total market capitalization (market capitalization is defined as common shares and OP Units outstanding multiplied by the closing price of the common shares on the New York Stock Exchange at December 31, 2004 of $44.37 plus preferred shares at liquidation value and consolidated debt) was $8.3 billion as compared to $5.6 billion at December 31, 2003 (based on a closing price of the common shares on the New York Stock Exchange at December 31, 2003 of $33.57). At December 31, 2004, the number of retail operating and development properties and office and industrial properties that the Company owned or in which it has an interest in totaled 436 and 32, respectively, aggregating 71.0 million and 4.0 million square feet of Company-owned GLA, respectively, in 44 states. The Company focuses on the ownership and management of high quality market dominant community shopping centers by:

  •  Recycling capital, through the sale of assets since cap rates on core acquisitions have dropped significantly, thereby enabling the Company to generate the greatest value creation through wholly-owned “greenfield” development;
 
  •  Engineering innovative joint venture structures with institutional capital partners adding equity and maximizing return on invested equity;
 
  •  Cultivating premier relationships with the nation’s leading retailers;
 
  •  Proactively replacing under-performing tenants with higher quality tenants at significantly higher rents and
 
  •  Maximizing revenue generation from existing centers through expansion, redevelopment and ancillary income.

      The Company focuses on strong and consistent portfolio fundamentals, such as:

  •  Consistently high percentage of occupancy rates;
 
  •  Significant base rental increases;
 
  •  Outstanding FFO per share growth;
 
  •  Consistent dividend per share growth while maintaining a conservative dividend payout ratio and
 
  •  Substantial retained cash flow.

      The Company has a focused and disciplined investment strategy. The Company utilizes its balance sheet to invest in new ground-up development because these development projects generate the highest yield per dollar invested. The Company utilizes joint ventures to invest in fully stabilized core assets which could potentially include assets from the Company’s development pipeline and to invest in value-added acquisitions, such as properties in need of redevelopment or re-tenanting and forward commitments.

Year in Review – 2004

      The Company’s portfolio continues to demonstrate strong leasing fundamentals, which reflects both the growing strength of the Company’s asset class and the quality of the Company’s portfolio. Moreover, the Company continued to structure and execute transactions during the year that support the Company’s investment

64


Table of Contents

strategy and result in long-term value creation for shareholders. Several of the Company’s significant accomplishments in 2004 are as follows:

      Net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $269.8 million, or $2.24 per share (diluted), compared to net income of $240.3 million, or $2.27 per share (diluted) for the prior comparable period. FFO applicable to common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $292.3 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2003 of $211.7 million, an increase of 38.1%. An increase in net income of approximately $29.5 million is due to (i) increases in 2004 operations which include the acquisition of assets from Benderson Development Company, Inc. (“Benderson”) (ii) an increase in gain on sales of real estate at the consolidated level and (iii) a reduction of litigation expense compared to 2003. These increases were offset by a decrease in certain transactional income from 2003.

      During the year, the Company sold over $700 million of assets, generating significant funds with which to re-invest into market-dominant community centers. These sales generated over $90 million in net gains, of which approximately $68 million were not included in FFO at the consolidated level. In addition, the Company’s joint ventures sold assets with an aggregate sales price of $180.6 million and recognized $44 million in net gains, of which approximately $38 million of net gains, at the joint venture level, were not included in FFO. The sales price for these assets provides an indicative value of the Company’s core portfolio, which includes the Company’s highest quality assets.

      On the acquisition front, the Company again demonstrated its ability to effectively execute large transactions. In March 2004, the Company announced the acquisition of assets from Benderson, which the Company closed in phases throughout 2004. In total, DDR acquired 107 assets aggregating approximately 18 million square feet for approximately $2.3 billion. The integration of the Benderson assets has progressed in a smooth manner as a result of the Company’s experience as a consolidator in the market. Since the Company acquired the portfolio, the Company believes tenant response has been positive. The Company has increased the leased rate in the Benderson assets by more than 100 basis points and continues to evaluate new opportunities to improve the tenant mix and internal growth of the portfolio.

      In conjunction with this acquisition, the Company raised the Company’s dividend 11%, and to finance the transaction the Company accessed a variety of sources, including common equity, preferred equity, senior unsecured public debt and bank term loans.

      In order to better align the Company’s Benderson and JDN Realty Corporation (“JDN”) acquisition portfolios with the Company’s community center investment strategy, the Company expanded its relationships with Kuwait Financial Centre and Prudential Real Estate Investors through two new joint venture transactions in the fourth quarter of 2004. The properties contributed to these joint ventures were neighborhood grocery-anchored centers that the Company had acquired from Benderson and JDN, representing $332 million in gross asset value. As a result of the sale of Benderson and JDN assets to these joint ventures, the Company has retained a portfolio of dominant community center assets and reduced the Company’s exposure to the risks accompanying neighborhood grocery-anchored centers.

      In November 2004, the Company announced a $1.15 billion acquisition of 15 Puerto Rican shopping centers from Caribbean Property Group (“CPG”), which closed in January 2005. This acquisition positions DDR as a dominant retail landlord in Puerto Rico, a U.S. Commonwealth whose economy is fueled by consumerism and whose developable land is highly constrained by physical barriers. The CPG acquisition was financed through the Company’s $250 million common equity offering in December 2004, $660 million of assumed debt and $332 million of proceeds generated by sales of neighborhood grocery anchored centers to joint ventures and other recent asset sales, including approximately $96.6 million of sales pursuant to the Company’s previously formed Australian based Listed Property Trust, Macquarie DDR Trust (“MDT”) with Macquarie Bank Limited, an international investment bank and advisor and manager of specialized real estate funds in Australia (“MDT Joint Venture”).

      Following the Company’s announcement of the Puerto Rican transaction, the Company announced an increase in the Company’s 2005 quarterly dividend to $0.54. Based on this amount, the Company’s 2005 anticipated dividends of $2.16 will be 11% higher than the Company’s 2004 actual dividends.

65


Table of Contents

      Portions of the financing of the Benderson and CPG acquisitions were provided by joint venture partners transactions. The Company’s joint venture activity is a critical component of the Company’s growth strategy for several reasons. First, it maintains alternative sources of equity capital over the long term, in both good times and bad. Second, it enables DDR to capitalize on strong institutional demand for retail assets, thereby preserving the Company’s capital and enhancing the Company’s returns through additional fee and merchant building income. Third, it allows DDR to better align the Company’s portfolio with the Company’s long-term investment strategy of owning market-dominant community centers.

      Since the beginning of 2004, the Company’s MDT Joint Venture portfolio grew to 36 shopping center properties, aggregating over 12 million square feet with total assets of approximately $1.4 billion. This growth included additional Australian equity offerings in May and December 2004, acquisitions comprised primarily of former Benderson assets, plus additional sales of 11 assets from the acquisition’s Company’s existing portfolio. The Company intends to continue to expand this relationship through additional sales to the MDT Joint Venture expected to close in 2005.

      In 2003, the Company entered into a joint venture (“Coventry II Joint Venture”) with Coventry Real Estate Fund II (the “Coventry II Fund”). During 2004, the Coventry II Joint Venture acquired four additional assets, bringing its total assets under management to nearly 4 million square feet, representing over $320 million in pro forma net project costs. In addition, the Company continues to earn property management, leasing and construction management fees.

      The Company’s philosophy toward variable rate debt is to maintain a floating rate debt percentage of total consolidated debt between 15% and 30%. In times when the yield curve is steepening, the Company may be above the 30% level, and as the Company believes the yield curve flattening, the Company will look to reduce the Company’s exposure to variable rate debt by locking in favorable long-term interest rates. Following the Company’s acquisition of assets from CPG in January 2005, the Company entered into a 10-year, $300 million interest rate lock of slightly less than 4.08% which will expire on May 9, 2005, in anticipation of refinancing $360 million of CPG debt that matures in April 2005.

      At December 31, 2004, the Company’s floating rate debt exposure was approximately 20% of total consolidated debt. Following the CPG transaction in January 2005, the percentage of floating rate debt exposure increased to 37%. Following the Company’s anticipated sales to the MDT Joint Venture in 2005 and the refinancing of $360 million of CPG debt, the Company anticipates that the floating rate debt will approximate 29% of total consolidated debt.

      Leasing and development activity continues at a strong pace throughout the portfolio. For the DDR core portfolio, which includes the former JDN assets and the former Benderson assets, the occupancy rate was steady at 94.7% at December 31, 2004.

      On the development landscape, the projects that are most negatively affected, from a yield perspective, by aggressive private capital are greenfield development projects with a low complexity factor, which attract local developers who build for fees and narrow spreads between value and cost. For example, the Company has seen numerous markets where competing private developers offer their lead anchor tenants heavily subsidized deals that drive project returns into the 8-9% range with hopes of exiting in the 7% range on top of recouping significant fees throughout the process. In such situations, the Company does not compete effectively and is unwilling to lower its return requirements to respond to that competitive dynamic.

      However, development projects such as Miami, Florida, Apex, North Carolina, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, or Mt. Laurel, New Jersey, which require a specific expertise and development capability, are less impacted by the competitive pressures previously described. Miami, Florida, for example, required extensive development skill to navigate the approval and subsidy process from local authorities in addition to requiring significant risk capital at an earlier stage in the process. The Company’s realistic competitors for that project were other public companies with similar costs of capital. As a result, the Company kept the process disciplined and is expected to ultimately earn returns in the 11% range. The project was simply too complex for unsophisticated developers to credibly pursue.

66


Table of Contents

      In Apex, North Carolina, Mt. Laurel, New Jersey and Mt. Nebo (Pittsburgh), Pennsylvania, the Company was faced with short land purchase agreements with short time periods, these agreements require land acquisition at a point in the pre-development process that most “local” developers couldn’t respond due to the inability to secure major tenants. Again, the Company’s access to the retail community and the Company’s ability to gauge tenant interest affords DDR a significant strategic advantage in deciding the viability of a particular site. Smaller developers without such access to retailers are generally not competitive in that situation.

      Another area where the Company is well-equipped to combat the market pressures of abundant private capital is the “certainty of execution” category. In many cases the Company is seeing opportunities where landowners or municipalities want assurance that a project will be built professionally and delivered as represented in the initial presentations. For example, in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey prior to the Company’s involvement, the land was mired in 10 years of litigation between the proposed developer and the municipality. There was a lack of trust that transcended the desire for the project to proceed. When the Company reached an agreement with the landowner, the Company immediately met with the municipality. The Company’s national track record coupled with market reputation resulted in a settlement of the suit that quickly permitted the entitlement process to conclude. Upon completion, this project is expected to provide a return in the range of 11.5%.

      Abundant capital is generally lowering development yields, but this situation has not occurred to date for DDR as the projects most impacted by tightened margins are not the developments the Company pursues. The yield pressure on the Company’s pipeline relates more to construction and labor costs that increase in the timeframe between the Company’s initial pro forma assumptions and the actual conclusion of the entitlement process and construction bidding completion. However, even with that current dynamic, the Company has been able to maintain a 300-400 basis point spread between cost and value, which still makes shopping center development an attractive business.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

      The consolidated financial statements of the Company include accounts of the Company and all majority-owned subsidiaries where the Company has financial or operating control. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes. In preparing these financial statements, management has utilized available information, including the Company’s past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the consolidated financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. It is possible that the ultimate outcome as anticipated by management in formulating its estimates inherent in these financial statements might not materialize. Application of the critical accounting policies described below involves the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates. In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact the comparability of the Company’s results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

 
Revenue Recognition and Accounts Receivable

      Rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis, which averages minimum rents over the current term of the leases. Certain of these leases provide for percentage and overage rents based upon the level of sales achieved by the tenant. These percentage rents are recorded once the required sales level is achieved and reported to the Company. The leases also typically provide for tenant reimbursements of common area maintenance and other operating expenses and real estate taxes. Accordingly, revenues associated with tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant lease provision. Management fees are recorded in the period earned. Ancillary and other property related income, which includes the leasing of vacant space to temporary tenants, is recognized in the period earned. Lease termination fees are included in other income and recognized and earned upon termination of a tenant’s lease and relinquishment of space in which the

67


Table of Contents

Company has no further obligation to the tenant. Acquisition and financing fees are recognized at the completion of the respective transaction and earned in accordance with the underlying agreements.

      The Company makes estimates of the collectibility of its accounts receivable related to base rents including straight-line rentals, expense reimbursements and other revenue or income. The Company specifically analyzes accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, with respect to tenants in bankruptcy, the Company makes estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims in assessing the estimated collectibility of the related receivable. In some cases, the ultimate resolution of these claims can exceed one year. These estimates have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because a higher bad debt reserve results in less net income.

 
Real Estate

      Land, buildings and fixtures and tenant improvements are recorded at cost and stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Renovations and/or replacements, which improve or extend the life of the asset, are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.

      Properties are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:

     
Buildings
  Useful lives, ranging from 30 to 31.5 years
Furniture/Fixtures and Tenant Improvements
  Useful lives, which approximate lease terms, where applicable

      The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to the useful life of its properties for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation to reflect on an annual basis with respect to those properties. These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s net income. If the Company would lengthen the expected useful life of a particular asset, it would be depreciated over more years, and result in less depreciation expense and higher annual net income.

      Assessment of recoverability by the Company of certain other lease related costs must be made when the Company has a reason to believe that the tenant may not be able to perform under the terms of the lease as originally expected. This requires management to make estimates as to the recoverability of such assets.

      Gains from sales of outlots and shopping centers are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 66 — “Accounting for Real Estate Sales,” provided that various criteria relating to the terms of sale and any subsequent involvement by the Company with the properties sold are met.

 
Long Lived Assets

      On a periodic basis, management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the real estate properties may be impaired. A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property are less than the carrying value of the property. In management’s estimate of cash flows, it considers factors such as expected future operating income, trends and prospects, as well as the effects of demand, competition and other factors. In addition, the undiscounted cash flows may consider a probability weighted cash flow estimation approach when alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long lived asset are under consideration or a range is estimated. The determination of undiscounted cash flows requires significant estimates by management and considers the expected course of action at the balance sheet date. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in anticipated actions could impact the determination of whether an impairment exists and whether the effects could materially impact the Company’s net income. To the extent an impairment has occurred, the loss will be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property.

68


Table of Contents

      When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Company discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs of such assets. If, in management’s opinion, the net sales price of the assets, which have been identified for sale, is less than the net book value of the assets, an impairment charge is recorded.

      The Company is required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the value of its real estate properties and other investments. These assessments have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because taking an impairment charge results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income.

      The Company allocates the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a gross basis based on their relative fair values at the date of acquisition pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence, marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information. Depending upon the size of the acquisition, the Company may engage an outside appraiser to perform a valuation of the tangible and intangible assets acquired. The Company is required to make subjective estimates in connection with these valuations and allocations.

 
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

      The Company has a number of off balance sheet joint ventures and other unconsolidated arrangements with varying structures. The Company consolidates certain entities in which it owns less than a 100% equity interest if it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary in a variable interest entity, as defined in FIN No. 46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“Fin 46R”).

      To the extent that the Company contributes assets to a joint venture, the Company’s investment in the joint venture is recorded at the Company’s cost basis in the assets that were contributed to the joint venture. To the extent that the Company’s cost basis is different than the basis reflected at the joint venture level, the basis difference is amortized over the life of the related asset and included in the Company’s share of equity in net income of joint ventures. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position 78-9 “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures,” the Company will recognize gains on the contribution of real estate to joint ventures, relating solely to the outside partner’s interest, to the extent the economic substance of the transaction is a sale.

 
Discontinued Operations

      The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” effective January 1, 2002. Pursuant to the definition of a component of an entity in the SFAS, assuming no significant continuing involvement, the sale of a retail or industrial property is now considered a discontinued operation. In addition, the operations from properties classified as held for sale are considered a discontinued operation. The Company generally considers assets to be held for sale when the transaction has been approved by the appropriate level of management and there are no known significant contingencies relating to the sale such that the property sale within one year is considered probable. Accordingly, the results of operations of operating properties disposed of or classified as held for sale subsequent to January 1, 2002 for which the Company has no significant continuing involvement, are reflected as discontinued operations. Interest expense, which is specifically identifiable to the property, is used in the computation of interest expense attributable to discontinued operations. Consolidated interest and debt at the corporate level is allocated to discontinued operations pursuant to the methods prescribed under EITF 87-24, based on the proportion of net assets sold.

      Included in discontinued operations as of and for the three years ending December 31, 2004, are 36 properties aggregating 2.1 million square feet of gross leasable area. The operations of such properties have been reflected on a comparative basis as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004 included herein.

69


Table of Contents

 
Stock-Based Employee Compensation

      The Company applies APB 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Accordingly, the Company does not recognize compensation cost for stock options when the option exercise price equals or in excess of the market value on the date of the grant. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of FASB’s proposed standard, “Share-Based Payment” (see New Accounting Standards). Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair values of the options granted at the grant dates, consistent with the method set forth in the SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock Based-Compensation — Transition and Disclosure an amendment of SFAS No. 123,” the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

                           
Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Net income, as reported
  $ 269,762     $ 240,261     $ 101,970  
Add:
                       
 
Stock-based employee compensation included in reported net income
    6,308       5,017       2,215  
Deduct:
                       
 
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards
    (5,062 )     (5,200 )     (2,515 )
     
     
     
 
    $ 271,008     $ 240,078     $ 101,670  
     
     
     
 
Earnings per share:
                       
 
Basic — as reported
  $ 2.27     $ 2.31     $ 1.09  
     
     
     
 
 
Basic — pro forma
  $ 2.28     $ 2.31     $ 1.08  
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted — as reported
  $ 2.24     $ 2.27     $ 1.07  
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted — pro forma
  $ 2.25     $ 2.27     $ 1.07  
     
     
     
 

      Certain of the Company’s executive officers were granted performance unit awards that provide for the issuance of up to 666,667 common shares. The amount of the total grant is determined based on the annualized total shareholders’ return over a five-year period with the common shares issued vesting over the remaining five-year period. As of December 31, 2004, the determination period for 200,000 of these shares was complete. The Company prepares estimates on this accrual quarterly based on the current stock price, dividend yield and the remaining vesting periods. The Company’s stock price has a direct impact on the Company’s recorded expense because a higher stock price will result in an increase in general and administrative expenses and less net income.

 
Accrued Liabilities

      The Company makes certain estimates for accrued liabilities including accrued professional fees, interest, real estate taxes, performance units (see discussion above), insurance and litigation reserves. These estimates are subjective and based on historical payments, executed agreements, anticipated trends and representations from service providers. These estimates are prepared based on information available at each balance sheet date and are reevaluated upon the receipt of any additional information. Many of these estimates are for payments that occur in one year. These estimates have a direct impact on the Company’s net income because a higher accrual will result in less net income.

70


Table of Contents

Comparison of 2004 to 2003 Results of Operations

Continuing Operations
 
Revenues from Operations
                                   
2004 2003 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Base and percentage rental revenues
  $ 438,600     $ 343,032     $ 95,568       27.9 %
Recoveries from tenants
    122,406       93,380       29,026       31.1  
Ancillary income
    3,325       2,347       978       41.7  
Other property related income
    4,300       911       3,389       372.0  
Management fee income
    14,626       10,647       3,979       37.4  
Development fee income
    2,311       1,446       865       59.8  
Other
    13,365       13,969       (604 )     (4.3 )
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total revenues
  $ 598,933     $ 465,732     $ 133,201       28.6 %
     
     
     
     
 

      Base and percentage rental revenues relating to new leasing, re-tenanting and expansion of the Core Portfolio Properties (shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 2003 and since April 1, 2003 includes assets acquired from JDN, excluding properties under development and those classified as discontinued operations) increased approximately $3.3 million, or 1.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. The increase in base and percentage rental revenues is due to the following (in millions):

         
Increase
(Decrease)

Core Portfolio Properties
  $ 3.3  
Merger with JDN
    19.5  
Acquisition of 4 shopping center properties in 2004 and 2003
    13.3  
Acquisition of properties from Benderson
    83.1  
Development and redevelopment of 10 shopping center properties in 2004 and 2003
    1.4  
Consolidation of a joint venture interest (FIN 46)
    2.9  
Transfer of 30 properties to joint ventures in 2004 and 2003
    (29.0 )
Business center properties
    (0.1 )
Straight-line rents
    1.2  
     
 
    $ 95.6  
     
 

      At December 31, 2004, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s shopping center portfolio was 94.7%, as compared to 94.3% at December 31, 2003. The average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $10.79 at December 31, 2004, as compared to $10.82 at December 31, 2003. Excluding the assets acquired from Benderson in 2004, the average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $11.13.

      At December 31, 2004, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s wholly-owned shopping centers was 93.7%, as compared to 92.9% at December 31, 2003. The average annualized base rent per leased square foot at December 31, 2004 was $9.70 as compared to $9.53 at December 31, 2003.

      At December 31, 2004, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s joint venture shopping centers was 97.1% as compared to 98.5% at December 31, 2003. The average annualized base rent per leased square foot was $12.15 at December 31, 2004, as compared to $13.74 at December 31, 2003. The decrease in the average annualized base rent per leased square foot is primarily attributable to the formation of two new joint ventures which acquired two grocery-anchored portfolios in the fourth quarter of 2004.

      At December 31, 2004, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s business centers was 76.0%, as compared to 78.1% at December 31, 2003.

71


Table of Contents

      The increase in recoveries from tenants was primarily related to the acquisition of properties from Benderson, which contributed $19.5 million, the JDN merger net of properties sold and transferred to joint ventures, which contributed $6.3 million, and the Company’s acquisition of four properties, which contributed $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. These increases were offset by a decrease of $7.8 million related to the transfer of 18 of the Company’s core portfolio properties to joint ventures. The remaining increase of $3.4 million related to the Company’s development properties becoming operational and an increase in operating expenses at the remaining shopping center and business center properties. Recoveries were approximately 81.8% and 79.0% of operating expenses and real estate taxes for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The slight increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in bad debt expense (see Expenses from Operations — Rental Operating and Maintenance Expenses) and changes in the Company’s portfolio of properties.

      Continued growth is anticipated in the area of ancillary, or non-traditional revenue, as additional revenue opportunities are pursued and currently established revenue opportunities proliferate throughout the Company’s core, acquired and development portfolio. Ancillary revenue opportunities have in the past included, but are not limited in the future to, short-term and seasonal leasing programs, outdoor advertising programs, wireless tower development programs and energy management programs, among others.

      Other property related income increases were primarily due to operating income from Gameworks and Cinemark Theatres at The Pike, a shopping center development in Long Beach, California.

      The increase in management fee income is from joint venture interests acquired and formed in 2003 and 2004, which aggregated $4.7 million. This increase was offset by the sale and transfer of several of the Company’s joint venture properties, which contributed approximately $0.8 million management fee income in 2003. The remaining $0.1 million increase primarily relates to an increase in fee income from the remaining joint venture and managed property portfolio. Management fee income is expected to continue to increase with the sale of assets to the MDT Joint Venture.

      Development fee income was primarily earned through one of the Company’s joint ventures involved in the redevelopment of certain real estate assets, previously owned and controlled by Service Merchandise and the redevelopment of four assets through the Coventry II Joint Venture. The Company expects to continue to pursue additional development joint ventures as opportunities present themselves.

      Other income is comprised of the following (in millions):

                 
Year Ended
December 31,

2004 2003


Lease termination fees
  $ 10.1     $ 6.9  
Settlement of call option (1)
          2.4  
Acquisition and financing fees (2)
    3.0       3.5  
Sale of option rights (3) and other miscellaneous
    0.3       1.2  
     
     
 
    $ 13.4     $ 14.0  
     
     
 

(1)  Settlement of a call option in 2003 relating to the MOPPRS debt assumed from JDN, principally arising from an increase in interest rates from the date of acquisition, March 13, 2003, to the date of settlement.
 
(2)  Structuring and financing fees received in connection with the MDT Joint Venture.
 
(3)  Relates to the sale of certain option rights (2003).

72


Table of Contents

 
Expenses from Operations
                                 
2004 2003 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Operating and maintenance
  $ 71,520     $ 61,125     $ 10,395       17.0 %
Real estate taxes
    78,094       57,041       21,053       36.9  
General and administrative
    47,126       40,820       6,306       15.4  
Depreciation and amortization
    131,577       93,155       38,422       41.2  
     
     
     
     
 
    $ 328,317     $ 252,141     $ 76,176       30.2 %
     
     
     
     
 

      Operating and maintenance expenses include the Company’s provision for bad debt expense which approximated 0.8% and 1.2% of total revenues, for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively (See Economic Conditions). The increase in rental operating and maintenance expenses is due to the following (in millions):

         
Increase
(Decrease)

Core Portfolio Properties
  $ (0.8 )
Acquisition of properties from Benderson
    9.2  
Merger with JDN
    1.5  
Acquisition and development/redevelopment of 14 shopping center properties in 2004 and 2003
    4.3  
Consolidation of a joint venture interest (FIN 46)
    0.9  
Transfer of 18 properties to joint ventures in 2004 and 2003
    (3.3 )
Business center properties
    (0.4 )
Provision for bad debt expense
    (1.0 )
     
 
    $ 10.4  
     
 

      Real estate taxes increased due to the following (in millions):

         
Increase
(Decrease)

Core Portfolio Properties
  $ 2.4  
Acquisition of properties from Benderson
    14.3  
Merger with JDN
    4.4  
Acquisition and development/redevelopment of 14 shopping center properties in 2004 and 2003
    4.2  
Consolidation of a joint venture interest (FIN 46)
    0.3  
Transfer of 18 properties to joint ventures in 2004 and 2003
    (4.6 )
Business center properties
    0.1  
     
 
    $ 21.1  
     
 

      Total general and administrative expenses were approximately 4.9% and 5.3%, respectively, of total revenues, including total revenues of joint ventures, for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to the growth of the Company through recent acquisitions, expansions and developments, including the JDN merger and acquisition of assets from Benderson and expenses related to the implementation of Section 404 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition, certain non-cash incentive compensation costs, primarily performance units and deferred director compensation, increased due to the increase in the Company’s share price, which contributed an additional $1.1 million of general and administrative costs.

73


Table of Contents

      The Company continues to expense internal leasing salaries, legal salaries and related expenses associated with the leasing and re-leasing of existing space. In addition, the Company capitalized certain direct construction administration costs consisting of direct wages and benefits, travel expenses and office overhead costs of $5.7 million and $5.1 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      Depreciation expense increased due to the following (in millions):

         
Increase
(Decrease)

Core Portfolio Properties
  $ 2.3  
Personal property
    0.7  
Acquisition of properties from Benderson
    28.6  
Merger with JDN
    5.6  
Acquisition and development/redevelopment of 14 shopping center properties in 2004 and 2003
    6.9  
Consolidation of a joint venture interest (FIN 46)
    1.1  
Transfer of 18 properties to joint ventures in 2004 and 2003
    (7.3 )
Business center properties
    0.5  
     
 
    $ 38.4  
     
 
 
Other Income and Expenses
                                 
2004 2003 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Interest income
  $ 4,235     $ 5,082     $ (847 )     (16.7 )%
Interest expense
    (129,659 )     (88,837 )     (40,822 )     46.0  
Other expense
    (1,779 )     (10,119 )     8,340       (82.4 )
     
     
     
     
 
    $ (127,203 )   $ (93,874 )   $ (33,329 )     35.5 %
     
     
     
     
 

      Interest income decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in the dollar amount of advances to certain joint ventures in which the Company has an equity ownership interest and the consolidation of joint venture interests in accordance with FIN 46.

      Interest expense increased primarily due to the merger with JDN and acquisition of assets from Benderson combined with other acquisitions and developments and the Company’s focus on reducing its exposure to floating rate debt through the issuance of long-term unsecured debt. The weighted average debt outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2004 and related weighted average interest rate was $2.8 billion and 5.1%, respectively, compared to $2.0 billion and 5.0%, respectively, for the same period in 2003. At December 31 2004, the Company’s weighted average interest rate was 5.4% compared to 4.8% at December 31, 2003. Interest costs capitalized, in conjunction with development and expansion projects and development joint venture interests, were $9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, as compared to $11.5 million for the same period in 2003.

74


Table of Contents

      Other expense is comprised of the following (in millions):

                 
Year Ended
December 31,

2004 2003


Abandoned acquisition and development projects
  $ 1.8     $ 0.9  
Legal settlement
          9.2 (1)
     
     
 
    $ 1.8     $ 10.1  
     
     
 


(1)  Relates to litigation filed against the Company by Regal Cinemas consisting of an $8.7 million judgment plus interest and legal costs (See Legal Matters).

 
Other
                                 
2004 2003 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Equity in net income of joint ventures
  $ 40,895     $ 44,967     $ (4,072 )     (9.1 )%
Gain on sale of joint venture interests
          7,950       (7,950 )     (100.0 )
Minority interests
    (5,013 )     (5,365 )     352       (6.6 )
Income tax of taxable REIT subsidiaries and franchise taxes
    (1,469 )     (1,626 )     157       (9.7 )

      Equity in net income of joint ventures decreased $4.0 million primarily as a result of one time transactions in 2003 partially offset by one time transactions in 2004 and an increase in joint venture income from newly formed joint ventures and those formed in 2003 but owned for an entire year of 2004. In 2003, the Company sold its interest in three 20% owned shopping centers, a 24.75% owned shopping center, a 50% owned shopping center and several sites formerly occupied by Service Merchandise and recognized a gain of $63.6 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was $16.2 million. Additionally, in 2003, the Company received a promoted interest of approximately $7.5 million from these gains and recorded $3.4 million relating to a gain on extinguishment of debt at one joint venture. Joint Venture income was $0.6 million higher in 2003 when compared to 2004 from an entity consolidated in 2004 in accordance with FIN 46. In 2004, the Company sold its interest in a 20% owned shopping center, a 35% owned shopping center, a portion of 24.75% owned shopping center and several sites formerly occupied by Service Merchandise and recognized an aggregate gain of approximately $44.6 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was $12.2 million. In addition, in 2004, the Company recognized promoted income of approximately $3.3 million relating to the sale of a shopping center transferred to MDT Joint Venture in November 2003 upon elimination of contingencies and substantial completion and lease up in 2004. The year 2004 also included an additional $2.9 million of equity in net income primarily related to debt refinancing and asset sales at one of the Company’s joint ventures. The recently formed Joint Ventures contributed additional net income of approximately $6.6 million compared to 2003.

      Gain on sale of joint venture interests related to the sale of joint venture interests to the MDT Joint Venture in the fourth quarter of 2003. The Company retained a 14.5% effective ownership interest in these assets and accordingly deferred approximately $19.5 million of the gain, which will be amortized over the life of the assets.

      Minority equity interest expense decreased primarily due to the redemption of $180 million of preferred operating partnership interests from the proceeds associated with the issuance of the Preferred Class G shares in March 2003 and is offset slightly due to the issuance of common operating partnership units in conjunction with the acquisition of assets from Benderson.

      Income tax expense of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiaries and franchise taxes is primarily attributable to an increase in franchise taxes primarily related to acquisitions offset by a $0.6 million refund of 2000 taxes.

75


Table of Contents

 
Discontinued Operations
                                 
2004 2003 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Income from operations
  $ 1,734     $ 226     $ 1,508       667.3 %
Gain on disposition of real estate, net
    8,561       460       8,101       1,761.1  
     
     
     
     
 
    $ 10,295     $ 686     $ 9,609       1,400.7 %
     
     
     
     
 

      Discontinued operations includes the operations of 22 shopping center properties and six business center properties aggregating approximately 1.7 million square feet of GLA, of which 15 were sold in 2004 (one of these properties was consolidated into the results of the Company in December 2003) and 13 in 2003. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.6 million and $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, related to the sale of two shopping centers and one business center property.

      Gain on the sale of discontinued operations is primarily due to the sale of 15 properties in 2004.

 
Gain on Disposition of Assets and Cumulative Effect of Adoption of a New Accounting Standard
                                 
2004 2003 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Gain on disposition of assets
  $ 84,642     $ 73,932     $ 10,710       14.5 %
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (3,001 )           (3,001 )     (100.0 )

      Gain on disposition of real estate in 2004 relates to the transfer of 11 assets to an effectively 14.5% owned joint venture which aggregated $65.4 million, of 13 assets to an effectively 20% owned joint venture which aggregated $2.5 million, of 12 assets to an effectively 10% owned joint venture which aggregated $4.2 million and are not classified as discontinued operations due to the Company’s continuing involvement due to its retained ownership interest and management control. In addition, land sales, which did not meet discontinued operations disclosure requirement, aggregated $14.3 million of gains in 2004 and an additional $0.8 million relating to the release of obligations for assets sold in 2003. These gains were primarily offset by a net loss on sale of non-core assets of approximately $2.6 million, which are expected to be recovered through earn out income over the next several years.

      Gain on disposition of real estate in 2003 primarily relates to the transfer of seven assets to a 20% owned joint venture and four assets to an effectively 14.5% owned joint venture, which aggregated $67.1 million and land sales which aggregated $6.8 million.

      The cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard is attributable to the consolidation of the partnership that owns a shopping center in Martinsville, Virginia upon adoption of FIN 46. This amount represents the minority partner’s share of cumulative losses in the partnership that were eliminated upon consolidation.

 
Net Income
                                 
2004 2003 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Net Income
  $ 269,762     $ 240,261     $ 29,501       12.3 %
     
     
     
     
 

76


Table of Contents

      Net income increased primarily due to the acquisition of assets from Benderson, the merger with JDN, gain on sale of assets and public debt and equity offerings. A summary of the changes from 2003 is as follows (in millions):

         
Increase in net operating revenues (total revenues in excess of operating and
       
maintenance expenses, real estate taxes, general and administrative expense and other expense)
  $ 103.8  
Increase in gain on sale of real estate and real estate investments
    10.7  
Increase in income from discontinued operations
    9.6  
Decrease in minority interest expense
    0.4  
Decrease in equity in net income of joint ventures
    (4.1 )
Increase in interest expense
    (40.8 )
Decrease in gain on sale of joint venture interests
    (8.0 )
Decrease in interest income
    (0.8 )
Increase in depreciation expense
    (38.4 )
Decrease in income tax expense
    0.1  
Increase in cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard (FIN 46)
    (3.0 )
     
 
    $ 29.5  
     
 

Comparison of 2003 to 2002 Results of Operations

Continuing Operations
 
Revenues from Operations
                                   
2003 2002 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Base and percentage rental revenues
  $ 343,032     $ 255,931     $ 87,101       34.0 %
Recoveries from tenants
    93,380       68,544       24,836       36.2  
Ancillary income
    2,347       1,914       433       22.6  
Other property related income
    911       1,584       (673 )     (42.5 )
Management fee income
    10,647       10,145       502       4.9  
Development fee income
    1,446       2,229       (783 )     (35.1 )
Other
    13,969       6,354       7,615       119.8  
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total revenues
  $ 465,732     $ 346,701     $ 119,031       34.3 %
     
     
     
     
 

77


Table of Contents

      Base and percentage rental revenues relating to new leasing, re-tenanting and expansion of the Core Portfolio Properties (shopping center properties owned as of January 1, 2002, excluding those classified as discontinued operations) contributed approximately $2.8 million, or 1.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002. The increase in base and percentage rental revenues is due to the following (in millions):

         
Increase
(Decrease)

Core Portfolio Properties
  $ 2.7  
Merger with JDN
    69.2  
Acquisition of 11 shopping center properties in 2003 and 2002
    21.1  
Development and redevelopment of six shopping center properties in 2003 and 2002
    1.9  
Transfer of 12 properties to joint ventures in 2003 and 2002
    (9.5 )
Business center properties
    (1.1 )
Straight-line rents
    2.8  
     
 
    $ 87.1  
     
 

      At December 31, 2003, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s shopping center portfolio was 94.3% as compared to 95.1% at December 31, 2002. Excluding the impact of the properties acquired through the JDN merger, the portfolio was 95.0% occupied. The average annualized base rent per occupied square foot was $10.82 at December 31, 2003, as compared to $10.58 at December 31, 2002.

      At December 31, 2003, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s wholly-owned shopping centers was 92.9%, as compared to 94.5% at December 31, 2002. Excluding the impact of the properties acquired through the JDN merger, the portfolio was 95.0% occupied. The average annualized base rent per leased square foot at December 31, 2003 was $9.53 as compared to $9.18 at December 31, 2002.

      At December 31, 2003, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s joint venture shopping centers was 98.5% as compared to 96.7% at December 31, 2002. The average annualized base rent per leased square foot was $13.74 at December 31, 2003, as compared to $13.69 at December 31, 2002.

      At December 31, 2003, the aggregate occupancy of the Company’s business centers was 78.1%, as compared to 83.5% at December 31, 2002. In 2003, the Company sold three of these properties.

      Recoveries increased primarily due to the JDN merger, which contributed $18.8 million, and the Company’s acquisition of thirteen properties, which contributed $13.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. Recoveries were approximately 79.0% and 80.9% of operating expenses and real estate taxes for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The slight decrease is primarily attributable to slightly lower occupancy levels combined with an increase in non-recoverable costs, an increase in bad debt expense (see Expenses from Operations — Rental Operating and Maintenance Expenses) and changes in the Company’s portfolio of properties.

      Ancillary income increased due to the Company pursuing additional revenue opportunities. Other property related income decreased primarily due to a reduction in late fee income.

      Management fee income includes management responsibilities assumed by the Company in October 2002 relating to a joint venture, which acquired the designation rights to real estate assets owned and controlled by Service Merchandise resulting in $0.4 million of additional management fee income. Additionally, the Company earned management income from joint venture interests acquired and formed in 2003, which aggregated $1.6 million and the lease up of joint ventures completing development aggregating $0.2 million. A decrease of $0.3 million was primarily associated with the termination of property management responsibilities for all of the real estate assets of Burnham Pacific Properties (“Burnham”) in 2002. In addition, due to the sale and transfer of several of the Company’s joint venture properties, management fee income decreased approximately $1.4 million as compared to 2002.

78


Table of Contents

      Development fee income decreased primarily attributable to development projects and redevelopments becoming operational during 2002. In 2003, the Company was developing more of its wholly-owned properties than properties held through joint ventures in large part due to properties under development at the time of the merger with JDN.

      Changes in other income are comprised of the following (in millions):

                 
Year Ended
December 31,

2003 2002


Lease termination fees
  $ 6.9     $ 3.4  
Settlement of call option (1)
    2.4        
Acquisition and financing fees (2)
    3.5       0.1  
Sale of option rights (3) and other miscellaneous
    1.2       2.9  
     
     
 
    $ 14.0     $ 6.4  
     
     
 


(1)  Settlement of a call option in 2003 relating to the MOPPRS debt assumed from JDN, principally arising from an increase in interest rates from the date of acquisition, March 13, 2003, to the date of settlement.
 
(2)  Primarily structuring and financing fees received in connection with the MDT Joint Venture.
 
(3)  Primarily relates to the sale of certain option rights (2003) and the sale of development rights to the Wilshire project in Los Angeles, California (2002).

 
Expenses from Operations
                                 
2003 2002 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Operating and maintenance
  $ 61,125     $ 42,243     $ 18,882       44.7 %
Real estate taxes
    57,041       42,459       14,582       34.3  
General and administrative
    40,820       29,392       11,428       38.9  
Depreciation and amortization
    93,155       76,155       17,000       22.3  
     
     
     
     
 
    $ 252,141     $ 190,249     $ 61,892       32.5 %
     
     
     
     
 

      Operating and maintenance expenses include the Company’s provision for bad debt expense which approximated 1.2% and 1.5% of total revenues, for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively (See Economic Conditions). The increase in rental operating and maintenance expenses is due to the following (in millions):

         
Increase
(Decrease)

Core Portfolio Properties
  $ 4.6  
Merger with JDN
    9.9  
Acquisition and development/redevelopment of 15 shopping center properties in 2003 and 2002
    4.2  
Transfer of 12 properties to joint ventures in 2003 and 2002
    (0.7 )
Provision for bad debt expense
    0.8  
Business center properties
    0.1  
     
 
    $ 18.9  
     
 

79


Table of Contents

      Real estate taxes increased due to the following (in millions):

         
Increase
(Decrease)

Core Portfolio Properties
  $ 0.5  
Merger with JDN
    10.5  
Acquisition and development/redevelopment of 15 shopping center properties in 2003 and 2002
    5.5  
Transfer of 12 properties to joint ventures in 2003 and 2002
    (2.2 )
Business center properties
    0.3  
     
 
    $ 14.6  
     
 

      General and administrative expenses were approximately 5.3% and 4.8% of total revenues, including revenues of joint ventures, for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to the growth of the Company through recent acquisitions, expansions and developments, including the JDN merger, which included certain transaction costs such as temporary employees, travel, relocation costs, recruiting fees and other transitional costs. The Company also incurred increases in director fees, other compensation and professional fees as a result of the passage of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act. In addition to these increases, general and administrative expenses includes approximately $4.0 million of non-cash executive management incentive compensation primarily associated with performance unit grants, which compares to $1.4 million during the same period of 2002. The performance unit awards granted in 2000 and 2002 provide for the issuance of up to 666,667 shares over a ten-year period, based on the average annual shareholder return over a five-year period with the shares vesting over the remaining five years. Such increase is attributable to the increase in the Company’s stock price in 2003. Excluding this additional non-cash incentive compensation, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, including joint venture revenues, was approximately 5.0% for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company capitalized certain construction administration costs of $5.1 million and $4.3 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively.

      Depreciation and amortization expense increased due to the following (in millions):

         
Increase
(Decrease)

Core Portfolio Properties
  $ (4.6 )
Merger with JDN
    17.7  
Acquisition and development/redevelopment of 15 shopping center properties in 2003 and 2002
    5.3  
Transfer of 12 properties to joint ventures in 2003 and 2002
    (2.1 )
Business center properties
    0.7  
     
 
    $ 17.0  
     
 
 
Other Income and Expenses
                                 
2003 2002 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Interest income
  $ 5,082     $ 5,905     $ (823 )     (13.9 )%
Interest expense
    (88,837 )     (75,754 )     (13,083 )     17.3  
Other expense
    (10,119 )     (1,018 )     (9,101 )     894.0  
     
     
     
     
 
    $ (93,874 )   $ (70,867 )   $ (23,007 )     32.5 %
     
     
     
     
 

      Interest income decreased primarily from the decrease in advances to certain joint ventures in which the Company has an equity ownership interest.

80


Table of Contents

      Interest expense increased primarily due to an increase in the weighted average debt outstanding due to the merger with JDN combined with other acquisitions and developments, offset by lower interest rates. The weighted average debt outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2003 and related weighted average interest rate was $2.0 billion and 5.0%, respectively, compared to $1.4 billion and 6.1%, respectively, for the same period in 2002. Interest costs capitalized, in conjunction with development and expansion projects and development joint venture interests, were $11.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003, as compared to $9.2 million for the same period in 2002.

      Other expense is comprised of the following (in millions):

                 
Year Ended
December 31,

2003 2002


Abandoned acquisition and development projects
  $ 0.9     $ 1.0  
Legal settlement
    9.2        
     
     
 
    $ 10.1     $ 1.0  
     
     
 

      Other expense of $9.2 million was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2003. This charge relates to litigation filed against the Company by Regal Cinemas consisting of an $8.7 million judgment plus interest and legal costs (See Legal Matters).

 
Other
                                 
2003 2002 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Equity in net income of joint ventures
  $ 44,967     $ 32,769     $ 12,198       37.2 %
Gain on sale of joint venture interests
    7,950             7,950       100.00  
Minority interests
    (5,365 )     (21,570 )     16,205       (75.1 )
Income tax of taxable REIT subsidiaries and franchise taxes
    (1,626 )     (742 )     (884 )     119.1  

      Equity in net income of joint ventures increases related to $6.2 million from the six joint ventures formed in 2003, a $3.4 million increase relates to the gain on extinguishment of debt at one joint venture and a $2.2 million increase, net, relates to the Company’s other joint ventures. During 2002 and 2003, the Company completed a significant amount of capital transactions related to its joint venture interests. In the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, these joint ventures sold 13 properties to third parties, six properties, (or interests therein) to the Company and 67 sites formerly occupied by Service Merchandise to third parties. These gains resulted in an aggregate increase in net income of approximately $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to 2002. Gains in 2003 include approximately $7.5 million of promoted income received from the Company’s joint venture partners from the transfer of six of these properties.

      Gain on sale of joint venture interests relates to the sale of joint venture interests to the MDT Joint Venture in the fourth quarter of 2003. The Company retained a 14.5% effective ownership interest in these assets and accordingly deferred approximately $19.5 million, which will be amortized over the life of the assets.

      Minority equity interest expense decreased primarily due to the redemption of $180 million of Preferred OP Units from the proceeds associated with the issuance of the Preferred Class G shares in March 2003 and the conversion of $35.0 million of Preferred OP Units into 1.6 million common shares in December 2002.

      Income tax expense of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiaries and franchise taxes is primarily attributable to an increase in franchise taxes primarily related to acquisitions.

81


Table of Contents

 
Discontinued Operations
                                 
2003 2002 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Income from operations
  $ 226     $ (1,777 )   $ 2,003       (112.7 )%
Gain (loss) on disposition of real estate, net
    460       4,276       (3,816 )     (89.2 )
     
     
     
     
 
    $ 686     $ 2,499     $ (1,813 )     (72.5 )%
     
     
     
     
 

      Discontinued operations includes the operations of 28 shopping center properties and seven business center properties aggregating approximately 2.1 million square feet of GLA, of which 14 were sold in 2004, 13 in 2003 and eight in 2002. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $2.6 million and $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, related to the sale of three shopping centers.

      Gain on the sale of discontinued operations is primarily due to the sale of 13 properties in 2003.

 
Gain on Disposition of Assets
                                 
2003 2002 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Gain on disposition of assets
  $ 73,932     $ 3,429     $ 70,503       2,056.1 %
     
     
     
     
 

      Gain on disposition of real estate in 2003 primarily related to the transfer of seven assets to a 20% owned joint venture and four assets to an effectively 14.5% owned joint venture, which aggregated $67.1 million and land sales which aggregated $6.8 million.

      Gain on disposition of real estate in 2002 primarily related to the sale of a 90% interest in a recently developed shopping center property located in Kildeer, Illinois, which resulted in a gain of $2.5 million and land sales which resulted in an aggregate gain of $0.9 million.

 
Net Income
                                 
2003 2002 $ Change % Change




(in thousands)
Net Income
  $ 240,261     $ 101,970     $ 138,291       135.6 %
     
     
     
     
 

      Net income increased primarily due to the merger with JDN, gain on sale of assets and various financing transactions. A summary of the changes from 2002 is as follows (in millions):

         
Increase in net operating revenues (total revenues in excess of operating and maintenance expenses, real estate taxes, general and administrative expense and other expense)
  $ 65.0  
Increase in equity in net income of joint ventures
    12.2  
Increase in gain on sale of joint venture interests
    8.0  
Increase in interest expense
    (13.1 )
Increase in gain on sale of real estate and real estate investments
    70.5  
Decrease in gain from discontinued operation
    (1.8 )
Increase in depreciation
    (17.0 )
Decrease in minority interest expense
    16.2  
Decrease in interest income
    (0.8 )
Increase in income tax
    (0.9 )
     
 
    $ 138.3  
     
 

82


Table of Contents

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS

      The Company believes that Funds From Operations (“FFO”), which is a non-GAAP financial measure, provides an additional and useful means to assess the financial performance of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). It is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate the performance of REITs, most of which present FFO along with net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP.

      FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and real estate investments, which assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes ratably over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions and many companies utilize different depreciable lives and methods. Because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization unique to real estate, gains and losses from depreciable property dispositions and extraordinary items, it provides a performance measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, acquisition and development activities and interest costs, which provides a perspective of the Company’s financial performance not immediately apparent from net income determined in accordance with GAAP.

      FFO available to common shareholders is generally defined and calculated by the Company as net income, adjusted to exclude: (i) preferred dividends, (ii) gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable real estate property, except for those sold through the Company’s merchant building program, which are presented net of taxes, (iii) sales of securities, (iv) extraordinary items and (v) certain non-cash items. These non-cash items principally include real property depreciation, equity income from joint ventures and equity income from minority equity investments and adding the Company’s proportionate share of FFO from its unconsolidated joint ventures and minority equity investments, determined on a consistent basis.

      For the reasons described above, management believes that FFO provides the Company and investors with an important indicator of the Company’s operating performance. This measure of performance is used by the Company for several business purposes and for REITs it provides a recognized measure of performance other than GAAP net income, which may include non-cash items (often large). Other real estate companies may calculate FFO in a different manner.

      The Company uses FFO (i) in executive employment agreements to determine incentives received based on the Company’s performance, (ii) as a measure of a real estate asset’s performance, (iii) to shape acquisition, disposition and capital investment strategies and (iv) to compare the Company’s performance to that of other publicly traded shopping center REITs.

      Management recognizes FFO’s limitations when compared to GAAP’s income from continuing operations. FFO does not represent amounts available for needed capital replacement or expansion, debt service obligations, or other commitments and uncertainties. Management does not use FFO as an indicator of the Company’s cash obligations and funding requirement for future commitments, acquisition or development activities. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs, including the payment of dividends. FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. FFO is simply used as an additional indicator of the Company’s operating performance.

      In 2004, FFO applicable to common shareholders was $292.3 million as compared to $211.7 million in 2003 and $154.7 million in 2002. The increase in total FFO in 2004 is principally attributable to increases in revenues from the Core Portfolio Properties, the acquisition of assets from Benderson, the merger with JDN, acquisitions and developments, the gain on sale of assets and residual land and various financing transactions.

83


Table of Contents

      The Company’s calculation of FFO is as follows (in thousands):

                           
Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Net income applicable to common shareholders (1)
  $ 219,056     $ 189,056     $ 69,368  
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments
    130,536       93,174       76,462  
Equity in net income of joint ventures
    (40,895 )     (44,967 )     (32,769 )
Gain on sale of joint venture interests
          (7,950 )      
Joint ventures’ FFO (2)
    46,209       47,942       44,473  
Minority equity interests (OP Units)
    2,607       1,769       1,450  
Gain on disposition of depreciable real estate (3)
    (68,179 )     (67,352 )     (4,276 )
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard (4)
    3,001              
     
     
     
 
FFO applicable to common shareholders
    292,335       211,672       154,708  
Preferred dividends (5)
    50,706       51,205       32,602  
     
     
     
 
 
Total FFO
  $ 343,041     $ 262,877     $ 187,310  
     
     
     
 


(1)  Includes straight-line rental revenues, which approximated $7.4 million in 2004, $6.3 million in 2003 and $3.3 million in 2002 (including discontinued operations).
 
(2)  Joint ventures’ FFO is summarized as follows (in thousands):

                         
Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Net income (a)
  $ 118,779     $ 120,899     $ 105,560  
Depreciation and amortization of real estate investments
    68,456       45,074       38,168  
Gain on disposition of real estate (b)
    (37,866 )     (59,354 )     (29,413 )
     
     
     
 
    $ 149,369     $ 106,619     $ 114,315  
     
     
     
 
DDR ownership interests (c)
  $ 46,209     $ 47,942     $ 44,473  
     
     
     
 

         


  (a)  Includes straight-line rental revenue of approximately $6.5 million in 2004, $4.8 million in 2003, and $3.2 million in 2002. The Company’s proportionate share of straight-line rental revenues was $1.4 million, $1.2 million and $1.1 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These amounts include discontinued operations.
 
  (b)  Included in equity in net income of joint ventures is approximately $7.5 million of promoted income received from the Company’s joint venture partners during the fourth quarter of 2003 which is included in the Company’s FFO. Also included in the joint venture net income and FFO, in the fourth quarter of 2003, is a gain associated with the early extinguishment of debt of approximately $4.2 million of which the Company’s proportionate share approximated $3.4 million. The gain on sale of recently developed shopping centers, owned by the Company’s taxable REIT affiliates, is included in FFO, as the Company considers these properties as part of the merchant building program. These properties were either developed through the Retail Value Investment Program with Prudential Real Estate Investors, or were assets sold in conjunction with the formation of the joint venture which holds the designation rights for the Service Merchandise properties. These gains aggregated $6.5 million, $4.3 million and $22.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, of which the Company’s proportionate share aggregated $1.7 million, $0.9 million and $11.3 million, respectively.
 
  (c)  The Company’s share of joint venture net income has been reduced by $1.3 million, $1.6 million and $2.0 million for the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, related to basis differentials. At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company owned joint venture interests relating to 103, 54 and 49 operating shopping center properties, respectively. In addition, at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company owned through its approximately 25% owned joint venture, 63, 72 and 100 shopping center sites, respectively, formerly owned by Service Merchandise. The Company also owned an approximate 25% interest in a joint venture with Prudential (Retail Value Investment Program) and a 50% joint venture equity interest in a real estate management/development company.

(3)  The amount reflected as gain on disposition of real estate and real estate investments from continuing operations in the consolidated statement of operations includes residual land sales, which management considers a sale of non-depreciated real property and the sale of newly developed shopping centers, for which the Company maintained continuing involvement. These sales are included in the Company’s FFO and therefore are not reflected as an adjustment to FFO.

84


Table of Contents

(4)  The Company recorded a charge of $3.0 million in 2004 as a cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard attributable to the consolidation of the shopping center in Martinsville, Virginia. This amount represents the minority partner’s share of cumulative losses in the partnership.
 
(5)  The Company complied with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) July 31, 2003 Staff Policy statement that clarifies EITF Topic No. D-42, “The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock,” and restated net income applicable to common shareholders for fiscal year 2002 and recorded the non-cash charges associated with the write-off of original issuance costs related to the Company’s redemption of preferred shares. As a result of this change in accounting principle, the Company has recorded a charge of $10.7 million and $5.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, to net income applicable to common shareholders and FFO.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

      The Company anticipates that cash flow from operating activities will continue to provide adequate capital for all interest and monthly principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, recurring tenant improvements, as well as dividend payments in accordance with REIT requirements and that cash on hand, borrowings under its existing revolving credit facilities, as well as other debt and equity alternatives, including the issuance of common and preferred shares, OP Units, joint venture capital and asset sales, will provide the necessary capital to achieve continued growth. The increase in cash flow from operating activities in 2004 as compared to 2003 was primarily attributable to the acquisition of assets from Benderson, the merger with JDN and various financing transactions and an increase in operating distributions from equity owned affiliates offset by the payment of the $8.7 million litigation settlement. The Company’s acquisition and developments completed in 2004 and 2003, new leasing, expansion and re-tenanting of the Core Portfolio Properties continue to add to the Company’s cash flow. Changes in cash flow from investing activities are described in Strategic Real Estate Transactions. Changes in cash flow from financing activities are described in Financing Activities.

      The Company’s cash flow activities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

                         
Year ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Cash flow from operating activities
  $ 292,226     $ 263,129     $ 210,739  
Cash flow used for investing activities
    (1,134,601 )     (16,246 )     (279,997 )
Cash flow provided by (used for) financing activities
    880,553       (251,561 )     66,560  

      The Company satisfied its REIT requirement of distributing at least 90% of ordinary taxable income with declared common and preferred share dividends of $245.3 million in 2004 as compared to $186.1 million and $126.2 million in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Accordingly, federal income taxes were not incurred at the corporate level. The Company’s common share dividend payout ratio for the year approximated 67.3% of its 2004 FFO as compared to 65.3% and 60.9% in 2003 and 2002, respectively.

      In November 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an increase in the 2005 quarterly dividend per common share to $0.54. The Company paid quarterly dividends per common share of $0.46 in the first and second quarters of 2004 and $0.51 in the third and fourth quarters of 2004. These increases are a result of increased cash flow attributable to the acquisition of assets from Benderson and the 15 shopping center assets acquired in Puerto Rico in 2005. The Company anticipates that the increased dividend level will continue to result in a conservative payout ratio. A low payout ratio enables the Company to retain more capital, which will be utilized towards attractive investment opportunities in the development, acquisition and expansion of portfolio properties or for debt repayment. Although there has been a slight increase in the Company’s payout ratio since 2002, the Company believes that it still has one of the lowest pay-out ratios in the industry. See “Off Balance Sheet Arrangements” and ‘Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments” sections for discussion of additional disclosure of capital resources.

85


Table of Contents

ACQUISITIONS, DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPANSIONS

      During the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, the Company and its joint ventures expended $4.5 billion, net, to acquire, develop, expand, improve and re-tenant its properties as follows (in millions):

                               
2004 2003 2002



Company:
                       
 
Acquisitions
  $ 2,170.8 (2)   $ 1,363.6 (6)   $ 298.6 (10)
 
Completed expansions
    25.2       26.8       8.0  
 
Developments and construction in progress
    203.8       104.6       66.4  
 
Tenant improvements and building renovations (1)
    6.6       6.3       7.3  
 
Furniture and fixtures and equipment
    1.3       1.9       2.3  
     
     
     
 
      2,407.7       1,503.2       382.6  
 
Less real estate sales and property contributed to joint ventures
    (689.2 )(3)     (422.4 )(7)     (72.2 )(11)
     
     
     
 
   
Company total
    1,718.5       1,080.8       310.4  
     
     
     
 
Joint Ventures:
                       
 
Acquisitions/ Contributions
    1,147.0 (4)     1,221.7 (8)     53.0  
 
Completed expansions
    10.3       9.7       9.0  
 
Developments and construction in progress
    38.9       120.1       48.6  
 
Tenant improvements and building renovations (1)
    0.6       0.6       1.6  
 
Other real estate investments
                241.6 (12)
     
     
     
 
      1,196.8       1,352.1       353.8  
   
Less real estate sales
    (306.7 )(5)     (781.5 )(9)     (441.2 )
     
     
     
 
   
Joint ventures total
    890.1       570.6       (87.4 )
     
     
     
 
      2,608.6       1,651.4       223.0  
   
Less proportionate joint venture share owned by others
    (807.8 )     (542.7 )     (71.0 )
     
     
     
 
     
Total DDR net additions
  $ 1,800.8     $ 1,108.7     $ 152.0  
     
     
     
 


(1)  In 2005, the Company anticipates recurring capital expenditures, including tenant improvements of approximately $8.0 million associated with its wholly owned and consolidated portfolio and $0.7 million associated with its joint venture portfolio.
 
(2)  In addition to the acquisition of assets from Benderson, amount includes the consolidation of certain joint venture assets due to FIN 46, the transfers to DDR from joint venture of assets in Littleton, Colorado and Merriam, Kansas and the purchase of DDR corporate headquarters.
 
(3)  Includes the sale of several outparcels. This balance also includes the transfer of twelve assets to the MDT Joint Venture, the transfer of twelve assets to the DPG Joint Venture and the transfer of thirteen assets to the DDR Markaz II Joint Venture.
 
(4)  In addition to the acquisition of assets discussed in (3) above, this amount included the MDT Joint Venture’s acquisition of 14 assets from Benderson, the purchase of a joint venture partner’s interest in a shopping center development in Deer Park, Illinois and Austin, Texas, the purchase of a fee interest in several Service Merchandise units and an earnout of two outparcels in Kildeer, Illinois.
 
(5)  Includes the transfer to DDR from joint ventures of shopping center assets located in Littleton, Colorado and Merriam, Kansas and adjustments due to GAAP presentation (FIN 46 and FAS 144) and the demolition of a portion of an asset in Lancaster, California.
 
(6)  Includes the JDN merger of approximately $1.1 billion of assets and the transfer from joint ventures of the Leawood, Kansas and Suwanee, Georgia shopping centers, and the consolidation of the assets owned by DD Development Company.

86


Table of Contents

(7)  Includes the sale of 11 shopping centers, three business centers, and the transfer of seven assets to the DDR Markaz LLC joint venture and the sale of several outparcels. The balance also includes the transfer of four assets to the Macquarie DDR Trust Joint Venture.
 
(8)  The balance includes the formation of MDT Joint Venture, DDR Markaz LLC and the acquisition of, or interests in, three shopping centers located in Phoenix, Arizona; Pasadena, California; and Kansas City, Missouri plus vacant land acquired in the JDN merger and equity investments previously held by DD Development Company for shopping centers in Long Beach, California; Shawnee, Kansas; Overland Pointe, Kansas; Olathe, Kansas and Kansas City, Missouri.
 
(9)  Includes six shopping centers, 22 Service Merchandise sites, the sale of an outparcel, and the transfer of the Leawood, Kansas and Suwanee, Georgia shopping centers to the Company. Also includes shopping centers sold to the MDT Joint Venture and assets owned by DD Development Company consolidated into DDR.

(10)  Includes transfer from joint ventures of shopping centers located in Independence, Missouri, Phase IV of Salisbury, Maryland, Canton, Ohio, Plainville, Connecticut, and San Antonio, Texas to DDR.
 
(11)  Includes a transfer to a joint venture of the shopping center in Kildeer, Illinois, and the sale of five shopping centers and three outlots.
 
(12)  Amount represents the assets acquired from Service Merchandise pursuant to the designation rights.

2005 Activity

 
Strategic Real Estate Transactions
 
Caribbean Property Group

      In January 2005, the Company purchased 15 Puerto Rican retail real estate assets, totaling nearly 5.0 million square feet, from CPG. The total purchase price was approximately $1.15 billion. The financing for the transaction was provided by the assumption of approximately $660 million of existing debt and line of credit borrowings of approximately $449.5 million on the Company’s $1.0 billion senior unsecured credit facility and the application of a $30 million deposit funded in 2004. The availability on the line of credit was created by the Company’s $250 million common equity issuance in December 2004, $332 million of proceeds generated by sales of neighborhood grocery-anchored centers to joint ventures and other recent asset sales, including $96.6 million of sales to the Company’s MDT Joint Venture.

 
Dispositions

      In 2005, the Company sold the following properties:

                 
Square Feet Sales Price
Location (Thousands) (Millions)



Shopping Center Properties
               
Transfer to Joint Venture Interests
               
Aurora, Colorado; Irving, Texas; Brookfield, Wisconsin; Plainville, Connecticut; Brandon, Florida (2 properties); Brown Deer, Wisconsin (2 properties) and Brentwood, Tennessee (1)
    1,778     $ 284.2  
     
     
 


(1)  The Company sold these wholly-owned assets to the MDT Joint Venture. The Company retained an effective 14.5% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount includes 100% of the selling price; the Company will eliminate that portion of the gain associated with its 14.5% ownership interest.

2004 Activity

 
Strategic Real Estate Transactions
 
Benderson Transaction

      In 2004, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase interests in 110 retail real estate assets with approximately 18.8 million square feet of GLA from Benderson. The purchase price of the assets, including associated expenses, was approximately $2.3 billion, including assumed debt and the value of a 2% equity interest in certain assets valued at approximately $16.2 million that Benderson retained as set forth below.

87


Table of Contents

      The Company completed the purchase of 107 properties (of which 93 were purchased by the Company and 14 were purchased directly by the MDT Joint Venture) at various dates commencing May 14, 2004 through December 21, 2004. The remaining three properties will not be acquired.

      In conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of assets from Benderson, the following capital transactions were entered into aggregating $1.1 billion in net proceeds, in addition to the MDT Joint Venture discussed above, were completed:

  •  In May 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with Bank One, Wachovia and Wells Fargo for a $200 million three-year term loan with two one-year extension options at an interest rate of LIBOR plus 75 basis points.
 
  •  In May 2004, the Company issued and sold 15,000,000 of DDR common shares with net proceeds of approximately $491 million.
 
  •  In May 2004, the Company issued and sold 6,800,000 depository shares, each representing 1/20 of a share of 7.50% Class I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares. Net proceeds from the sale of the depository shares were approximately $164.2 million.
 
  •  In April 2004, the Company issued $250 million, 5.25% seven-year notes through a private placement.

      With respect to this joint venture, Benderson will have the right to cause the joint venture to redeem its 2.0% interest for a price equal to the agreed upon value of the interest after 20 months from the initial acquisition, of approximately $16.2 million, adjusted to reflect changes in the price of the Company’s common shares during the period in which Benderson holds the 2.0% interest, less certain distributions Benderson receives from the joint venture. If Benderson exercises the foregoing right, the Company will have the right to satisfy the joint venture’s obligation by purchasing Benderson’s interest for cash or by issuing DDR common shares to Benderson. If Benderson does not elect to exercise its right to have its interest redeemed, the Company will have the right after 30 months from the initial acquisition to purchase that 2.0% interest for cash or common shares for a price determined in the same manner as if Benderson had elected to cause such redemption.

      The Company funded the transaction through a combination of new debt financing, the issuance of cumulative preferred shares and common shares (see Financings) and asset transfers to the MDT Joint Venture (see MDT Joint Venture), discussed above line of credit borrowings and assumed debt. With respect to assumed debt, the fair value of indebtedness assumed upon closing was approximately $400 million, which included an adjustment of approximately $30.0 million to fair value, based on rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities as of May 2004.

      The Benderson assets are located in 11 states, with over 80.0% of the GLA in New York and New Jersey. The Benderson assets were approximately 94.6% leased, including master lease units, at June 30, 2004, and the largest tenants, based on revenues, include Tops Markets (Ahold USA), Wal-Mart/ Sam’s Club, Home Depot and Dick’s Sporting Goods. Prior to the transaction, the Company owned less than 100,000 square feet of GLA in New York and approximately 2.7 million square feet of GLA in New Jersey.

      Benderson entered into a five-year master lease for certain vacant space that was either covered by a letter of intent as of the closing date or a new lease with respect to which the tenant had not begun to pay rent as of the closing date. During the five-year master lease, Benderson agreed to pay the rent for such vacant space until each applicable tenant’s rent commencement date. The Company recorded the master lease receivable as part of the purchase price allocation. Included in accounts receivable at December 31, 2004 is approximately $3.2 million related to a master lease obligation from Benderson.

 
MDT Joint Venture

      In November 2003, the Company closed a transaction pursuant to which the Company formed an Australian based Listed Property Trust, Macquarie DDR Trust (“MDT”), with Macquarie Bank Limited (ASX: MBL), an international investment bank, advisor and manager of specialized real estate funds in Australia (“MDT Joint Venture”). MDT focuses on acquiring ownership interests in institutional-quality community center properties in the U.S. DDR remains responsible for all day-to-day operations of the properties and receives fees at prevailing

88


Table of Contents

rates for property management, leasing, construction management, acquisitions, due diligence, dispositions (including outparcel sales) and financing. Through their joint venture, DDR and MBL will also receive base asset management fees and incentive fees based on the performance of MDT. At December 31, 2004, MDT, which listed on the Australian Stock Exchange in November 2003, owned an approximate 83% interest in the portfolio. DDR retained an effective 14.5% ownership interest in the assets and MBL primarily owning the remaining 2.5%.

      In May 2004, the MDT Joint Venture acquired an indirect ownership interest in 23 retail properties, which consisted of over 4.0 million square feet of Company-owned GLA. The aggregate purchase price of the properties was approximately $538.0 million. Eight of the properties acquired by MDT Joint Venture were owned by the Company and one of the properties was held by the Company through a joint venture which aggregated approximately $239 million. Fourteen of the properties acquired by MDT were owned by Benderson and valued at approximately $299 million. In December 2004, the Company contributed three operating properties to the MDT Joint Venture for approximately $96.6 million. These transactions aggregating $634.3 million were funded by approximately $321.4 million of equity and $312.9 million of debt and assets and liabilities assumed. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $65.4 million relating to the sale of the effective 85.5% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $11.1 million relating to the Company’s effective 14.5% interest.

      Through March 15, 2005, the Company sold an additional nine properties to the MDT Joint Venture for approximately $284.2 million.

      The MDT Joint Venture has a two-year right of first offer which expires in March 2005 on 20 pre-determined joint venture and wholly-owned assets in DDR’s portfolio. This right of first offer only applies if DDR determines that it will pursue the sale of these assets. The MDT Joint Venture also is expected to pursue acquisitions of additional stabilized, institutional-quality community center properties.

      MDT is governed by a board of directors, which includes three members selected by DDR, three members selected by MBL and three independent members.

 
Coventry II

      In 2003, the Coventry II Fund was formed with several institutional investors and Coventry Real Estate Advisors (“CREA”) as the investment manager. Neither the Company nor any of its officers, own a common interest in the Coventry II Fund or have any incentive compensation tied to this Fund. The Coventry II Fund and DDR have agreed to jointly acquire value-added retail properties in the United States. CREA obtained $330 million of equity commitments to co-invest exclusively in joint ventures with DDR. The Coventry II Fund’s strategy is to invest in a variety of retail properties that present opportunities for value creation, such as re-tenanting, market repositioning, redevelopment or expansion.

89


Table of Contents

      DDR expects, but is not obligated, to co-invest 20% in each joint venture and will be responsible for day-to-day management of the properties. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture, DDR will earn fees for property management, leasing and construction management. DDR also will earn a promoted interest, along with CREA, above a 10% preferred return after return of capital to fund investors. The assets of the Coventry II Joint Venture at December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                       
Acquisition
Effective Square Feet Price
Location Interest (Thousands) (Millions)




2004:
                   
 
Buena Park, California
    20 %    738   $ 91.5  
 
San Antonio, Texas
    10 %   Under Development(1)     8.1 (2)
 
Seattle, Washington
    20 %    291     37.0  
 
Phoenix, Arizona
    20 %   1,134     46.5  
2003:
                   
 
Kansas City, Missouri
    20 %    712     48.4  


(1)  Expected to be completed in Fall 2005. A third party developer owns 50% of this investment.
 
(2)  Net of $2.5 million sale to Target.

 
Prudential Joint Venture

      In October 2004, the Company completed a $128 million joint venture transaction (“DPG Joint Venture”) with Prudential Real Estate Investors (“PREI”). The Company contributed 12 neighborhood grocery-anchored retail properties to the joint venture, eight of which were acquired by the Company from Benderson and four of which were acquired from JDN. The joint venture assumed approximately $12 million of secured, non-recourse financing associated with two properties. The Company maintains a 10% ownership in the joint venture and continues day-to-day management of the assets. The Company earns fees for property management, leasing, and development. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $4.2 million relating to the sale of the 90% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $0.5 million relating to the Company’s 10% interest.

 
Kuwait Financial Centre Joint Venture II

      In November 2004, the Company completed a $204 million joint venture transaction (“DDR Markaz II”) with an investor group led by Kuwait Financial Centre-Markaz (a Kuwaiti publicly traded company). The Company contributed 13 neighborhood grocery-anchored retail properties to the joint venture, nine of which were acquired by the Company from Benderson, three of which were acquired from JDN and one of which was owned by the Company. DDR Markaz II obtained approximately $150 million of seven-year secured non-recourse financing at a fixed rate of approximately 5.1%. The Company maintains a 20% equity ownership in the joint venture and continues day-to-day management of the assets. The Company earns fees at prevailing rates for property management, leasing and development. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $2.5 million relating to the sale of the 80% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $0.7 million relating to the Company’s 20% interest.

 
Service Merchandise Joint Venture

      In March 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture with Lubert-Adler Funds and Klaff Realty, L.P., which was awarded asset designation rights for all of the retail real estate interests of the bankrupt estate of Service Merchandise Corporation. The Company has an approximate 25% interest in the joint venture. In addition, the Company earns fees for the management, leasing, development and disposition of the real estate portfolio. The designation rights enable the joint venture to determine the ultimate use and disposition of the real estate interests held by the bankrupt estate. At December 31, 2004, the portfolio consisted of 63 Service

90


Table of Contents

Merchandise retail sites totaling approximately 3.4 million square feet, of which 69.6% is leased or in the process of being leased.

      During 2004, the joint venture sold 11 sites and received gross proceeds of approximately $20.7 million and recorded an aggregate gain of $2.0 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was approximately $0.5 million. In 2004, the Company earned an aggregate of $1.4 million including disposition, development, management and leasing fees and interest income of $1.2 million relating to this investment. This joint venture has total assets and total debt of approximately $177.5 million and $62.6 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004. The Company’s investment in this joint venture was $27.2 million at December 31, 2004.

 
Expansions

      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company completed seven expansion and redevelopment projects located in North Little Rock, Arkansas; Brandon, Florida; Starkville, Mississippi; Aurora, Ohio; Tiffin, Ohio; Monaca, Pennsylvania and Chattanooga, Tennessee at an aggregate cost of approximately $25.2 million. The Company is currently expanding/redeveloping 11 shopping centers located in Gadsden, Alabama; Tallahassee, Florida; Suwanee, Georgia; Ottumwa, Iowa; Gaylord, Michigan; Princeton, New Jersey; Hendersonville, North Carolina; Allentown, Pennsylvania; Erie, Pennsylvania; Brentwood, Tennessee and Johnson City, Tennessee at a projected incremental cost of approximately $33.9 million. The Company is also scheduled to commence construction on an additional expansion project at its shopping center located in Amherst, New York.

 
Acquisitions

      In 2004, the Company acquired the following shopping center assets:

                 
Gross
Purchase
Square Feet Price
Location (Thousands) (Millions)



Littleton, Colorado (1)
    228     $ 6.3  
Benderson Development Company (See 2004 Strategic Real Estate Transactions)
    12,501       2,014.4  
     
     
 
      12,729     $ 2,020.7  
     
     
 


(1)  Reflects the Company’s purchase price, net of debt assumed, associated with the acquisition of its partner’s 50% ownership interest.

     In 2004, the Company’s joint ventures acquired the following shopping center assets, not including those assets purchased from the Company or its joint ventures:

                 
Gross
Purchase
Square Feet Price
Location (Thousands) (Millions)



Buena Park, California (1)
    738     $ 91.5  
Kirkland, Washington (1)
    291       37.0  
Phoenix, Arizona (1)
    1,134       45.6  
San Antonio, Texas (2)
    N/A       N/A  
Benderson Development Company (3)
    2,497       299.0  
     
     
 
      4,660     $ 473.1  
     
     
 


(1)  The Company purchased a 20% equity interest.
 
(2)  The Company purchased an effective 10% equity interest for $8.1 million. Approximately 16 acres of land were sold to Target for $2.5 million subsequent to the purchase. This project is currently under development.
 
(3)  The MDT Joint Venture acquired an indirect ownership interest in 23 retail properties. Eight of the properties acquired by the MDT Joint Venture were owned by the Company and one of the properties was held by the Company through a joint

91


Table of Contents

venture. These nine properties were valued at approximately $239 million. Fourteen of the properties acquired by the MDT Joint Venture were owned by Benderson and valued at approximately $299 million. The Company owns a 14.5% equity interest in the MDT Joint Venture.

 
Development (Consolidated)

      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company substantially completed the construction of seven shopping centers located in Long Beach, California; Fort Collins, Colorado; St. Louis, Missouri; Hamilton, New Jersey; Apex, North Carolina; Irving, Texas and Mesquite, Texas.

      The Company currently has seven shopping center projects under construction. These projects are located in Miami, Florida; Overland Park, Kansas; Chesterfield, Michigan; Lansing, Michigan; Freehold, New Jersey; Mount Laurel, New Jersey and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. These projects are scheduled for completion during 2005 and 2006 at a projected aggregate cost of approximately $235.3 million and will create an additional 2.5 million square feet of retail space. At December 31, 2004, approximately $153.8 million of costs were incurred in relation to these development projects.

      The Company anticipates commencing construction in 2005 on two additional shopping centers located in Norwood, Massachusetts and McKinney, Texas.

      The wholly-owned and consolidated development funding schedule as of December 31, 2004 is as follows (in millions):

           
Funded as of December 31, 2004
  $ 460.0 (1)
Projected net funding during 2005
    94.9 (2)
Projected net funding thereafter
    25.3 (2)
     
 
 
Total
  $ 580.2  
     
 


(1)  Amount includes funding for assets previously placed in service.
 
(2)  Amount will be reduced by additional proceeds to be obtained through construction loans.

 
Development (Joint Ventures)

      The Company has joint venture development agreements for four shopping center projects. These projects have an aggregate projected cost of approximately $119 million. These projects are located in Jefferson County (St. Louis, Missouri); Apex, North Carolina (Phases III and IV), adjacent to a wholly-owned development project; and San Antonio, Texas. A portion of the project located in Jefferson County (St. Louis, Missouri) has been substantially completed. The remaining projects are scheduled for completion in 2005 and 2006. At December 31, 2004, approximately $24.5 million of costs were incurred in relation to these development projects.

      The joint venture development funding schedule as of December 31, 2004 is as follows (in millions):

                                   
DDR’s JV Partners’ Proceeds from
Proportionate Proportionate Construction
Share Share Loans Total




Funded as of December 31, 2004
  $ 13.2     $ 6.0     $ 5.3     $ 24.5  
Projected net funding during 2005
    6.8             62.1       68.9  
Projected Net Funding Thereafter
                25.6       25.6  
     
     
     
     
 
 
Total
  $ 20.0     $ 6.0     $ 93.0     $ 119.0  
     
     
     
     
 

92


Table of Contents

 
Dispositions

      In 2004, the Company sold the following properties:

                         
Square Feet Sales Price Gain (Loss)
Location (Thousands) (Millions) (Millions)




Shopping Center Properties
                       
Core Portfolio Properties (1)
    414     $ 17.8     $ 3.5  
Former JDN properties (2)
    270       38.9       2.6  
Transfer to joint venture interests
                       
Coon Rapids, Minnesota; Asheville, North Carolina; Murfreesboro, Tennessee; Nashville, Tennessee; Monaca, Pennsylvania; Fayetteville, Arkansas (2 properties); Erie, Pennsylvania; Columbia, South Carolina; Lewisville, Texas and Birmingham, Alabama (3)
    2,321       285.3       65.4  
Lawrenceville, Georgia; Lilburn, Georgia; Columbia, Tennessee; Farragut, Tennessee; Hamburg, New York; Arcade, New York; Avon, New York; Norwich, New York; Tonawanda, New York (2 properties); Hamlin, New York and Elmira, New York (4)
    1,168       128.6       4.2  
Loganville, Georgia; Goodlettsville,Tennessee; Oxford, Mississippi; Irondequoit, New York; Orchard Park, New York; Rochester, New York; Cheektowaga, New York; Jamestown, New York; Warsaw, New York; Ontario, New York; Leroy, New York; Chillicothe, Ohio and Amherst, New York (5)
    1,577       203.8       2.5  
Business Center Properties (6)
    94       8.3       1.9  
     
     
     
 
      5,844     $ 682.7     $ 80.1  
     
     
     
 


(1)  Properties located in Trinidad, Colorado; Waterbury, Connecticut; Hazard, Kentucky; Las Vegas, Nevada and North Olmsted, Ohio. Property in North Olmsted, Ohio represents the sale of an asset through the merchant building program. This property was consolidated into the Company with the adoption of FIN 46 in 2004.
 
(2)  Properties located in Canton, Georgia; Cumming, Georgia; Marietta, Georgia; Peachtree City, Georgia; Suwanee, Georgia; Sumter, South Carolina; Franklin, Tennessee and Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
 
(3)  The Company contributed eleven wholly-owned assets of the Company to the MDT Joint Venture. The Company retained an effective 14.5% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount includes 100% of the selling price; the Company eliminated that portion of the gain associated with its 14.5% ownership interest (See 2004 Strategic Real Estate Transactions).
 
(4)  The Company formed a new joint venture with PREI in 2004 and contributed 12 neighborhood grocery anchored retail properties of the Company. The Company retained a 10% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount includes 100% of the selling price; the Company eliminated that portion of the gain associated with its 10% ownership interest (See 2004 Strategic Real Estate Transactions).
 
(5)  The Company formed DDR Markaz II in 2004 and contributed 13 neighborhood grocery anchored retail properties of the Company. The Company retained a 20% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount includes 100% of the selling price; the Company eliminated that portion of the gain associated with its 20% ownership interest (See 2004 Strategic Real Estate Transactions).
 
(6)  Properties located in Sorrento, California and Mentor, Ohio.

93


Table of Contents

     In 2004, the Company’s joint ventures sold the following shopping center properties, excluding the one property purchased by the Company as described above:

                                 
Company’s Company’s
Effective Proportionate
Ownership Square Feet Sales Price Share of Gain
Location Percentage (Thousands) (Millions) (Millions)





Puente Hills, California (1)
    20 %     519     $ 66.2     $ 4.0  
Mission Viejo, California
    20 %     46       18.0       2.0  
San Antonio, Texas
    35 %     320       59.1       6.7  
Long Beach, California (1)
    24.75 %     85       16.6       1.3  
Service Merchandise locations
    25 %     692       20.7       0.5  
             
     
     
 
              1,662     $ 180.6     $ 14.5  
             
     
     
 


(1)  The joint venture sold a significant portion of the shopping center.

2003 Activity

 
Strategic Real Estate Transactions
 
Merger with JDN Realty Corporation

      During the first quarter of 2003, the Company and JDN’s shareholders approved a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which JDN shareholders received 0.518 common shares of DDR in exchange for each share of JDN common stock on March 13, 2003. DDR issued approximately 18 million common shares in conjunction with this merger. The transaction valued JDN at approximately $1.1 billion, which included approximately $606.2 million of assumed debt at fair market value and $50 million of voting preferred shares. The Company repaid approximately $314 million of debt assumed subsequent to the merger. DDR acquired 102 retail assets aggregating 23 million square feet. Additionally, DDR acquired a development pipeline of additional properties.

 
Macquarie DDR Trust

      In 2003, the MDT Joint Venture acquired, at an aggregate purchase value (assuming 100% ownership) of approximately $730 million, an initial portfolio of eleven assets previously owned by DDR and its joint ventures, funded by approximately $363.5 million of equity and $366.5 million of debt and assets and liabilities assumed. The MDT Joint Venture initially owned an 81.0% interest in the eleven asset portfolio. DDR retained a 14.5% effective ownership interest in the assets and MBL owns the remaining 4.5%. DDR recorded fees aggregating $6.7 million in 2003 in connection with the structuring, formation and operation of the MDT Joint Venture. DDR received approximately $195 million in cash and retained a $53 million equity investment in the joint venture, which represents DDR’s 14.5% effective ownership interest.

 
Kuwait Financial Centre Joint Venture

      In May 2003, the Company completed a $156 million joint venture transaction (“DDR Markaz I”) with an investor group led by Kuwait Financial Centre — Markaz. The Company contributed seven retail properties to the joint venture. In connection with this formation, DDR Markaz I secured $110 million, non-recourse, five-year, secured financing at a fixed interest rate of approximately 4.13%. Proceeds from the transaction were used to repay variable rate indebtedness. The Company retained a 20% ownership interest in these seven properties. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $25.8 million, none of which was included in FFO, relating to the sale of the 80% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $6.5 million relating to the Company’s 20% interest. These properties are not included in discontinued operations as the Company maintains continuing involvement through both its ownership interest and management activities. The Company earns fees at prevailing rates for asset management, property management, leasing, out-parcel sales and construction management.

94


Table of Contents

 
Coventry II

      In 2003, the Coventry II Joint Venture acquired Ward Parkway, a 712,000 square foot shopping center located in suburban Kansas City, Missouri that was purchased for approximately $48.4 million.

 
Service Merchandise Joint Venture

      During 2003, the joint venture sold 22 sites and received gross proceeds of approximately $55.0 million and recorded an aggregate gain of $5.1 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was approximately $1.3 million. In 2003, the Company also earned disposition, development, management and leasing fees aggregating $1.7 million and interest income of $1.0 million relating to this investment. The Company also received distributions aggregating $1.0 million resulting from loan refinancings at the joint venture level.

 
Expansions

      In 2003, the Company completed expansions and redevelopments at nine shopping centers located in Birmingham, Alabama; Bayonet Point, Florida; Brandon, Florida; Tucker, Georgia; Fayetteville, North Carolina; North Canton, Ohio; Erie, Pennsylvania; Riverdale, Utah and Taylorsville, Utah at an aggregate cost of approximately $26.8 million. In 2003, the Company’s joint ventures completed expansions and redevelopments at three shopping centers located in San Ysidro, California; Shawnee, Kansas and North Olmsted, Ohio at an aggregate cost of approximately $9.7 million.

 
Acquisitions

      In 2003, the Company acquired the following shopping center assets:

                 
Gross
Purchase
Square Feet Price
Location (Thousands) (Millions)



JDN merger (See Strategic Real Estate Transactions)
    23,036     $ 1,051.5  
Suwanee, Georgia
    306       3.4 (1)
Leawood, Kansas
    413       15.3 (2)
Gulfport, Mississippi
    540       45.5  
Broomfield, Colorado
    422       55.5  
     
     
 
      24,717     $ 1,171.2  
     
     
 


(1)  Reflects the Company’s purchase price associated with the acquisition of its partner’s 51% ownership interest.
 
(2)  Reflects the Company’s purchase price associated with the acquisition of its partner’s 50% ownership interest.

     In 2003, the Company’s joint ventures acquired the following shopping center assets, not including those purchased from the Company or its joint ventures:

                 
Gross
Purchase
Square Feet Price
Location (Thousands) (Millions)



Kansas City, Missouri
    712     $ 48.4 (1)
Phoenix, Arizona
    296       43.0 (2)
Pasadena, California
    560       113.5 (3)
     
     
 
      1,568     $ 204.9  
     
     
 


(1)  The Company purchased a 20% equity interest.
 
(2)  The Company purchased a 67% equity interest, net of debt assumed, for approximately $17.4 million.
 
(3)  The Company purchased a 25% equity interest, net of debt assumed, for approximately $7.1 million.

95


Table of Contents

     The MDT Joint Venture acquired seven assets from other joint venture investments and four assets from the Company.

 
Development

      In 2003, the Company substantially completed the construction of thirteen shopping centers located in Fayetteville, Arkansas; Sacramento, California; Aurora, Colorado; Parker, Colorado; Parker South, Colorado; Lithonia, Georgia; McDonough, Georgia; Meridian, Idaho (Phase II of the existing shopping center); Grandville, Michigan; Coon Rapids (Minneapolis) Minnesota; St. John’s, Missouri; Erie, Pennsylvania and Frisco, Texas.

 
Dispositions

      In 2003, the Company sold the following properties:

                         
Square Feet Sales Price Gain (Loss)
Location (Thousands) (Millions) (Millions)




Shopping Center Properties
                       
Core Portfolio Properties (1)
    110     $ 4.9     $ (1.4 )
Former JDN properties (2)
    399       42.2       (0.5 )
Transfer to joint venture interests
                       
Richmond, California; Oviedo, Florida; Tampa, Florida; Highland, Indiana; Grove City, Ohio; Toledo, Ohio and Winchester, Virginia (3)
    1,441       156.0       25.8  
St. Paul, Minnesota; Independence, Missouri; Canton, Ohio and North Olmsted, Ohio (4)
    1,873       229.1       41.3  
Business Center Properties (5)
    395       14.0       0.5  
     
     
     
 
      4,218     $ 446.2     $ 65.7  
     
     
     
 


(1)  Properties located in Eastlake, Ohio; St. Louis, Missouri and Anderson, South Carolina.
 
(2)  Properties located in Atlanta, Georgia; Decatur, Alabama; Nacogdoches, Texas; Fayetteville, Georgia; Lilburn, Georgia; Gulf Breeze, Florida and Buford, Georgia.
 
(3)  The Company formed a joint venture with funding advised by Kuwait Financial Centre — Markaz and contributed seven wholly-owned shopping centers. The Company retained a 20% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount includes 100% of the selling price; the Company eliminated that portion of gain associated with its 20% ownership interest (See 2003 Strategic Real Estate Transactions).
 
(4)  The Company contributed four wholly-owned assets of the Company to the MDT Joint Venture. The Company retained an effective 14.5% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. The amount includes 100% of the selling price; the Company eliminated that portion of the gain associated with its 14.5% ownership interest (See 2003 Strategic Real Estate Transactions).
 
(5)  Properties located in Aurora, Ohio; Streetsboro, Ohio and Twinsburg, Ohio.

     In 2003, the Company’s joint ventures sold the following shopping center properties excluding those purchased by the Company as described above:

                                 
Company’s Company’s
Effective Proportionate
Ownership Square Feet Sales Price Share of Gain
Location Percentage (Thousands) (Millions) (Millions)





Bellingham, Washington; Sacramento, California and Fullerton, California
    20%       420     $ 57.8     $ 2.6  
St. Louis, Missouri
    50%       211       22.0       2.6  
Kansas City, Missouri
    24.75%       15       2.6       0.1  
San Diego, California
    20%       440       95.0       7.1  
Service Merchandise locations
    24.75%       1,174       55.0       1.3  
             
     
     
 
              2,260     $ 232.4     $ 13.7  
             
     
     
 

96


Table of Contents

      The Company’s joint ventures also sold their interest in seven assets to the MDT Joint Venture at a gross sales price aggregating $497.6 million. Since the membership interests in the Company’s Community Center Joint Venture and Coon Rapids Joint Venture were transferred to the MDT Joint Venture, the gain was recognized at the partnership level. The Company recognized a gain of $27.4 million on its partnership interests. However, since the Company retained an effective 14.5% interest in the MDT Joint Venture, the Company has deferred the recognition of $19.5 million of this gain. The aggregate gain recognized by the Company relating to the sale of its equity interest in these entities to the MDT Joint Venture of $8.0 million is classified in gain on sale of joint venture interest in the consolidated statement of operations (See 2003 Strategic Real Estate Transactions).

2002 Activity

 
Strategic Real Estate Transactions
 
Service Merchandise Portfolio

      During 2002, the Company’s Service Merchandise joint venture sold 45 sites and received gross proceeds of approximately $106.5 million. The Company recognized pre-tax income of approximately $4.4 million relating to the operations of this joint venture. The Company also earned disposition, management, leasing and financing fees aggregating $1.4 million in 2002 relating to this joint venture.

 
Expansions

      In 2002, the Company completed expansions and redevelopments at five shopping centers located in Denver, Colorado; Detroit, Michigan; St. Louis, Missouri; Lebanon, Ohio; and North Olmsted, Ohio at an aggregate cost of approximately $8.0 million. In 2002, the Company’s joint ventures completed expansions and redevelopments at seven shopping centers located in Atlanta, Georgia; Marietta, Georgia; Schaumburg, Illinois; Leawood, Kansas; Overland Park, Kansas; Maple Grove, Minnesota and San Antonio, Texas at an aggregate cost of approximately $15.0 million.

 
Acquisitions

      In 2002, the Company acquired the following shopping center assets:

                 
Gross
Purchase
Square Feet Price
Location (Thousands) (Millions)



Plainville, Connecticut
    470     $ 44.4 (1)
San Antonio, Texas
    270       32.1 (1)
Forth Worth, Texas; Dallas, Texas; Columbia, South Carolina; Birmingham, Alabama and Wichita, Kansas
    1,000       81.8 (2)
North Canton, Ohio
    230       11.4 (3)
Independence, Missouri
    380       33.4 (4)
San Francisco, California (Historic Van Ness) and Richmond, California (Hilltop)
    368       65.4 (5)
     
     
 
      2,718     $ 268.5 (6)
     
     
 


(1)  Reflects the Company’s purchase price associated with the acquisition of its partner’s 75.25% ownership interest in these shopping centers.
 
(2)  Reflects the Company’s purchase price associated with the acquisition of a portfolio of shopping centers.
 
(3)  Reflects the Company’s purchase price associated with the acquisition of its partner’s 50% interest in this shopping center.
 
(4)  Reflects the Company’s purchase price associated with the acquisition of its partner’s 80% interest in this shopping center.

97


Table of Contents

(5)  Reflects the Company’s acquisition of two shopping center properties from Burnham Pacific Properties, Inc., Burnham Pacific Operating Partnership, L.P., and BPP/ Van Ness, L.P. This acquisition was financed through the issuance of approximately 2.5 million common shares valued at approximately $49.2 million and cash.
 
(6)  The Company’s total real estate assets increased approximately $299 million relating to these acquisitions after reflecting the reclassification of the Company’s ownership interest from advances to and investments in joint ventures.

 
Dispositions

      The Company sold the following properties in 2002:

                           
Square Feet Sales Price Gain (loss)
Location (Thousands) (Millions) (Millions)




Shopping Center Properties
                       
Core Portfolio Properties (1)
    433     $ 31.0     $ (0.4 )
Transfer to joint venture interests
                       
 
Kildeer, Illinois (2)
    158       28.0       2.5  
Business Center Property (3)
    21       1.7        
     
     
     
 
      612     $ 60.7     $ 2.1  
     
     
     
 


(1)  Properties located in Orlando, Florida; Columbia, South Carolina; Jacksonville, North Carolina; St. Louis, Missouri (American Plaza); Ocala, Florida; Huntsville, Alabama and Cape Coral, Florida.
 
(2)  The Company formed a joint venture with funds advised by DRA Advisors, Inc. and contributed a wholly-owned new shopping center development. The Company retained a 10% equity ownership interest in the joint venture. Represents the sale of assets through the merchant building program.
 
(3)  Property located in Dallas, Texas.

     The Company’s joint ventures sold the following shopping center properties, excluding those purchased by the Company as described above, in 2002:

                                 
Company’s Company’s
Effective Proportionate
Ownership Square Feet Sales Price Share of Gain
Location Percentage (Thousands) (Millions) (Millions)





Round Rock, Texas (2)
    24.75 %     438     $ 78.1     $ 5.4  
Denver, Colorado
    20.00 %     390       43.0       2.8  
Salem, New Hampshire (2)
    24.75 %     170       25.0       1.1  
Hagerstown, Maryland (2)
    24.75 %     286       41.7       1.9  
Eatontown, New Jersey (2)
    79.56 %     68       14.0       1.9  
Durham, North Carolina
    20.00 %     408       50.1       2.1  
Service Merchandise locations
    25.00 %     2,667       106.5       4.4  
             
     
     
 
              4,427     $ 358.4     $ 19.6  
             
     
     
 


(2)  Represents the sale of assets through the merchant building program.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

      The Company has a number of off balance sheet joint ventures and other unconsolidated arrangements with varying structures. The Company has investments in operating properties, development properties and a management and development company. Such arrangements are generally with institutional investors and various developers located throughout the United States.

      In connection with the development of shopping centers owned by certain of these affiliates, the Company and/or its equity affiliates have agreed to fund the required capital associated with approved development projects aggregating approximately $18.7 million at December 31, 2004. These obligations, comprised principally of

98


Table of Contents

construction contracts, are generally due in twelve to eighteen months and are expected to be financed through new or existing construction loans.

      The Company has provided loans and advances to certain unconsolidated entities in the amount of $3.1 million at December 31, 2004 for which the Company’s joint venture partners have not funded their proportionate share. These entities are current on all debt service owing to DDR. The Company has guaranteed base rental income from one to three years at 12 centers held through the Service Merchandise joint venture, aggregating $3.3 million at December 31, 2004. The Company has not recorded a liability for the guarantee as the subtenants of the KLA/ SM affiliates are paying rent as due. The Company has recourse against the other parties in the partnership in the event of default.

      The Company is involved with overseeing the development activities for several of its joint ventures that are constructing, redeveloping or expanding shopping centers. The Company earns a fee for its services commensurate with the level of oversight provided. The Company generally provides a completion guarantee to the third party lending institution(s) providing construction financing.

      The Company’s joint ventures have aggregate outstanding indebtedness to third parties of approximately $1.8 billion and $1.3 billion at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, of which the Company’s proportionate share was $420.8 million and $368.5 million, respectively. Such mortgages and construction loans are generally non-recourse to the Company and its partners. Certain mortgages may have recourse to its partners in certain limited situations such as misuse of funds and material misrepresentations.

      One of the Company’s joint venture arrangements provide that the Company’s partner can convert its interest in the joint venture into DDR’s common shares. The number of common shares that DDR would be required to issue would be dependent upon the then fair value of the partner’s interest in the joint venture divided by the then fair value of DDR’s common shares. The Company can elect to substitute cash for common shares. At December 31, 2004, assuming such conversion option was exercised, and shares were issued, assets currently aggregating $228.4 million would be consolidated and an additional $156.0 million of mortgage indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 2004 relating to the joint venture which contains this provision would be recorded in the Company’s balance sheet, since this entity is currently accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Should the Company elect to issue cash, the Company’s debt balance would increase by both the existing debt relating to this joint venture, as previously referred to, as well as potential additional debt, which would be incurred to finance the purchase of the equity of the other partner. The Company does not anticipate that its joint venture partners will exercise their rights pursuant to the aforementioned conversion rights, as these institutional investors typically do not invest in equity securities.

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

      The Company has historically demonstrated its access to capital through both the public and private markets. The acquisitions, developments and expansions were generally financed through cash provided from operating activities, revolving credit facilities, mortgages assumed, construction loans, secured debt, unsecured public debt, common and preferred equity offerings, joint venture capital, OP Units and asset sales. Total debt outstanding at December 31, 2004 was approximately $2.7 billion as compared to approximately $2.1 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In 2004, the increase in the Company’s outstanding debt was due primarily to the acquisition of assets from Benderson.

99


Table of Contents

      A summary of the aggregate financings through the issuance of common shares, preferred shares, construction loans, medium term notes, term loans and OP Units (units issued by the Company’s partnerships) aggregated $4.5 billion during the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, is summarized as follows (in millions):

                               
2004 2003 2002



Equity:
                       
 
Common shares
  $ 737.4 (1)   $ 381.9 (5)   $ 119.2 (10)
 
Preferred shares
    170.0 (2)     435.0 (6)     150.0 (11)
     
     
     
 
   
Total equity
    907.4       816.9       269.2  
     
     
     
 
Debt:
                       
 
Construction and other secured loans
    55.4       61.2       183.3  
 
Permanent financing
          150.0 (7)      
 
Mortgage debt assumed
    420.2       183.6       9.7  
 
Tax increment financing
    8.6             7.3  
 
Medium term notes
    525.0 (3)     300.0 (8)     100.0  
 
Unsecured term loans
    200.0 (4)     300.0 (9)      
     
     
     
 
     
Total debt
    1,209.2       994.8       300.3  
     
     
     
 
    $ 2,116.6     $ 1,811.7     $ 569.5  
     
     
     
 


(1)  15.0 million shares issued in May 2004 and 5.45 million shares in December 2004.
 
(2)  Issuance of Class I 7.5% Preferred Shares.
 
(3)  Includes $275 million five-year senior unsecured notes with a coupon rate of 3.875%. These notes are due January 30, 2009 and were offered at 99.584% of par. Also includes, $250 million seven-year senior unsecured notes with a coupon rate of 5.25%. These notes are due April 15, 2011 and were offered at 99.574% of par.
 
(4)  This facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 0.75% and matures in May 2006. This facility has two one-year extension options to 2008.
 
(5)  Issued as consideration in the merger with JDN.
 
(6)  Includes issuance of $50 million of preferred voting shares in conjunction with the merger with JDN. Proceeds from the Class G 8.0% preferred shares issued were used to retire $180 million, Preferred OP Units with a weighted average rate of 8.95%. Proceeds from the Class H 7.375% preferred shares issued were used to retire the Company’s Class C 8.375% preferred shares, Class D 8.68% preferred shares and 9.375% preferred voting shares.
 
(7)  Represents a $150 million secured financing for five years with interest at a coupon rate of 4.41%.
 
(8)  Seven-year senior unsecured notes with a coupon rate of 4.625%. These notes are due August 1, 2010 and were offered at 99.843% of par.
 
(9)  This facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.0% and had a one-year term. The Company exercised two six-month extension options and repaid this facility in March 2005. This facility has a balance of $150 million at December 31, 2004. The proceeds from this facility were primarily used to repay JDN’s revolving credit facility with outstanding principal of $229 million at the time of the merger and to repay $85 million of MOPPRS debt and a related call option prior to maturity on March 31, 2003.

(10)  Approximately $50 million of common equity was issued in exchange for two shopping center assets and $35 million was issued in exchange for the replacement of $35 million of 8.5% Preferred OP Units.
 
(11)  Proceeds from the Class F 8.6% preferred shares issued were used to retire the Company’s Class A 9.5% preferred shares and 9.44% Class B preferred shares aggregating $149.8 million.

     In September 2004, the Company was added to the S&P MidCap 400 Index.

      In September 2004, the Company had declared effective a $1.0 billion shelf registration statement with the SEC under which debt securities, preferred shares or common shares may be issued. At December 31, 2004, the Company had $754 million of debt securities, preferred shares or common shares which may be issued under this registration statement.

100


Table of Contents

      In July 2004, the Company expanded its unsecured revolving credit facility from $650 million to $1.0 billion.

CAPITALIZATION

      At December 31, 2004, the Company’s capitalization consisted of $2.7 billion of debt (excluding the Company’s proportionate share of joint venture mortgage debt aggregating $420.8 million as compared to $368.5 million in 2003), $705 million of preferred shares and $4.9 billion of market equity (market equity is defined as common shares and OP Units outstanding multiplied by the closing price of the common shares on the New York Stock Exchange at December 31, 2004 of $44.37) resulting in a debt to total market capitalization ratio of 0.33 to 1.0 as compared to the ratios of 0.37 to 1.0 and 0.43 to 1.0 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s total debt consisted of $2,167.1 million of fixed rate debt, including $80 million of variable rate debt, which has been effectively swapped to a fixed rate of approximately 2.8%, and $549.3 million of variable rate debt, including $60 million of fixed rate debt which has been effectively swapped to a variable rate.

      It is management’s strategy that the Company have access to the capital resources necessary to expand and develop its business. Accordingly, the Company may seek to obtain funds through additional equity offerings or debt financings or joint venture capital in a manner consistent with its intention to operate with a conservative debt capitalization policy and maintain its investment grade ratings with Moody’s Investors Service (Baa3 stable) and Standard and Poor’s (BBB stable). The security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, as it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

      The Company’s credit facilities and the indentures under which the Company’s senior and subordinated unsecured indebtedness is, or may be issued, contain certain financial and operating covenants, including, among other things, debt service coverage and fixed charge coverage ratios, as well as limitations on the Company’s ability to incur secured and unsecured indebtedness, sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets and engage in mergers and certain acquisitions. Although the Company intends to operate in compliance with these covenants, if the Company were to violate those covenants, the Company may be subject to higher finance costs and fees. Foreclosure on mortgaged properties or an inability to refinance existing indebtedness would likely have a negative impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

      As of December 31, 2004, the Company had cash of $49.9 million and $990 million available under its $1.1 billion revolving credit facilities. As of December 31, 2004, the Company also had 223 operating properties generating $325.3 million, or 53.8%, of the total revenue of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, which were unencumbered, thereby providing a potential collateral base for future borrowings.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

      In November 2004, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase 15 Puerto Rican retail real estate assets, totaling nearly 5.0 million square feet from CPG. The total purchase price was approximately $1.15 billion. The transaction closed during the first quarter of 2005.

      The Company has debt obligations relating to its revolving credit facilities, term loan, fixed rate senior notes and mortgages payable (excluding the effect of the fair value hedge) with maturities ranging from 1 to 25 years. In addition, the Company has non-cancelable operating leases, principally for office space and ground leases.

101


Table of Contents

      These obligations are summarized as follows for the subsequent five years ending December 31 (in thousands):

                 
Operating
Year Debt Leases



2005
  $ 241,173     $ 4,463  
2006
    338,814       4,074  
2007
    287,326       3,907  
2008
    289,927       3,893  
2009
    375,695       3,719  
Thereafter
    1,183,491       182,299  
     
     
 
    $ 2,716,426     $ 202,355  
     
     
 

      Debt maturities in 2005 include construction loans of $57.0 million which will be refinanced or extended on similar terms. Senior notes of $1.0 million are expected to be paid from operating cash flow. The unsecured term loan of $150 million due in 2005 was repaid from borrowings from the revolving credit facility in March 2005. The remaining obligations are expected to be repaid from operating cash flow, revolving credit facilities and/or other unsecured debt or equity financings and asset sales.

      In 2006, it is anticipated that the $41.6 million in mortgage loans will be refinanced or paid from operating cash flow. The $60 million in revolving credit facilities scheduled to mature in 2006 are anticipated to be extended on similar terms. The unsecured term loan of $200 million due in 2006 has two one-year extension options to 2008. No assurance can be provided that the aforementioned loans will be refinanced as anticipated.

      The Company has mortgage and credit facility obligations as numerated above. These obligations generally have monthly payments of principal and/or interest over the term of the obligation. The interest payable over the term of the credit facilities and construction loans is determined based on the amount outstanding. The Company continually changes its asset base, so that the amount of interest payable on the mortgages over its life cannot be easily determined and is therefore excluded from the table above.

      At December 31, 2004, the Company had letters of credit outstanding of approximately $23.0 million of which $1.6 million relates to letters of credit provided on behalf of equity affiliates. (See Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements). The Company has not recorded any obligation associated with these letters of credit. The majority of letters of credit are primarily collateral for existing indebtedness and other obligations accrued on the Company’s accounts.

      In conjunction with the development of shopping centers, the Company has entered into commitments with general contractors for its wholly-owned properties of $84.6 million at December 31, 2004. These obligations, comprised principally of construction contracts, are generally due in 12 to 18 months and are expected to be financed through operating cash flow and/or new or existing construction loans or revolving credit facilities.

      In 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with DRA Advisors, its partner in the Community Centers contributed to the MDT Joint Venture, to pay an $0.8 million annual consulting fee for 10 years for services rendered relating to the assessment of financing and strategic investment alternatives.

      In connection with the sale of one of the properties to the MDT Joint Venture, the Company deferred the recognition of approximately $3.6 million and $3.7 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, of the gain on sale of real estate related to a shortfall agreement guarantee maintained by the Company. The MDT Joint Venture is obligated to fund any shortfall amount that is caused by the failure of the landlord or tenant to pay taxes when due and payable on the shopping center. The Company is obligated to pay any shortfall to the extent that is not caused by the failure of the landlord or tenant to pay taxes when due and payable on the shopping center. No shortfall payments have been made on this property since the completion of construction in 1997.

      The Company entered into master lease agreements with the MDT Joint Venture in 2003 and 2004 with the transfer of properties to the joint venture which has been recorded as a liability and reduction of its gain. The Company is responsible for the monthly base rent, all operating and maintenance expenses and certain tenant

102


Table of Contents

improvements and leasing commissions for units not yet leased at closing for a three-year period. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s master lease obligation, included in accounts payable and other expenses, totaled approximately $7.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively.

      The Company entered into master lease agreements with the DDR Markaz II joint venture in October 2004 in connection with the transfer of properties to the joint venture at closing. The Company is responsible for the monthly base rent, all operating and maintenance expenses and certain tenant improvements and leasing commissions for units not yet leased at closing for a three-year period. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s master lease obligation, included in accounts payable and other expenses, totaled $4.4 million.

      Related to one of the Company’s developments in Long Beach, California, the Company guaranteed the payment of any special taxes levied on the property within the City of Long Beach Community Facilities District No. 6 and attributable to the payment of debt service on the bonds for periods prior to the completion of certain improvements related to this project. In addition, an affiliate of the Company has agreed to make an annual payment of approximately $0.6 million to defray a portion of the operating expenses of the parking garage through the earlier of October 2032 or until the City’s parking garage bonds are repaid. There are no assets held as collateral or liabilities recorded related to these obligations.

      The Company enters into cancelable contracts for the maintenance of its properties. At December 31, 2004, the Company had purchase order obligations payable, typically payable within one year, aggregating approximately $2.0 million related to the maintenance of its properties and general and administrative expenses.

      The Company has entered into employment contracts with several of its key executives. These contracts provide for base pay, bonuses based on the results of operations of the Company, option and restricted stock grants and reimbursement of other various expenses (health insurance, life insurance, automobile expenses, country club expenses and financial planning expenses). These contracts are for a one-year term and subject to cancellation in one year with respect to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and 90 days with respect to the other officers.

      The Company continuously monitors its obligations and commitments. There have been no other material items entered into by the Company since December 31, 2003 through December 31, 2004 other than as described above. See discussion of commitments relating to the Company’s joint ventures and other unconsolidated arrangements in “Off Balance Sheet Arrangements.”

INFLATION

      Substantially all of the Company’s long-term leases contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation. Such provisions include clauses enabling the Company to receive additional rental income from escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases and/or percentage rentals based on tenants’ gross sales. Such escalations are determined by negotiation, increases in the consumer price index or similar inflation indices. In addition, many of the Company’s leases are for terms of less than ten years, which permits the Company to seek increased rents upon renewal at market rates. Most of the Company’s leases require the tenants to pay their share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing the Company’s exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.

ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

      Historically, real estate has been subject to a wide range of cyclical economic conditions, which affect various real estate markets and geographic regions with differing intensities and at different times. Different regions of the United States have been experiencing varying economic recession. Adverse changes in general or local economic conditions, could result in the inability of some existing tenants of the Company to meet their lease obligations and could otherwise adversely affect the Company’s ability to attract or retain tenants. The Company’s shopping centers are typically anchored by two or more national tenant anchors (Wal-Mart, Kohl’s, Target), home improvement stores (Home Depot, Lowe’s) and two or more medium sized big-box tenants (Bed

103


Table of Contents

Bath & Beyond, T.J. Maxx/ Marshalls, Best Buy, Ross Stores), which generally offer day-to-day necessities, rather than high-priced luxury items. In addition, the Company seeks to reduce its operating and leasing risks through ownership of a portfolio of properties with a diverse geographic and tenant base.

      The retail shopping sector has been impacted by the competitive nature of the retail business and the competition for market share, where stronger retailers have out-positioned some of the weaker retailers. This positioning is taking market share away from weaker retailers and forcing them, in some cases, to declare bankruptcy and/or close stores. Certain retailers have announced store closings even though these retailers have not filed for bankruptcy protection. Notwithstanding any store closures, the Company does not expect to have any significant losses associated with these tenants. Overall, the Company’s portfolio remains stable. While negative news relating to troubled retail tenants tends to attract attention, the vacancies created by unsuccessful tenants may also create opportunities to increase rent.

      Although certain individual tenants within the Company’s portfolio have filed for bankruptcy protection, the Company believes that its major tenants, including Wal-Mart, Kohl’s, Target, Lowe’s, T.J. Maxx, Bed Bath & Beyond and Best Buy are secure retailers based upon their credit quality. This stability is further evidenced by the tenants’ relatively constant same store tenant sales growth in this economic environment. In addition, the Company believes that the quality of its shopping center portfolio is strong, as evidenced by the high historical occupancy rates, which have ranged from 92% to 96% since 1993. Also, average base rental rates have increased from $5.48 to $10.79 since the Company’s public offering in 1993.

LEGAL MATTERS

      In January 2004, the appellate court denied the Company’s appeal of a judgment in the amount of $8.0 million, plus interest and attorneys’ fees, against the Company and two other defendants, in connection with a verdict reached in a civil trial involving a claim filed by Regal Cinemas relating to a property owned by the Company. After consultation with legal counsel, the Company determined that it would not appeal the appellate court’s ruling. The Company accrued a liability of $9.2 million, representing the judgment plus accrued interest and legal costs, at December 31, 2003. In 2004, the Company paid $8.9 million, representing the amount of the judgment, accrued interest and amounts due for the attorneys’ fees. Based on the obligations assumed by the Company in connection with the acquisition of the property and the Company’s policy to indemnify officers and employees for actions taken during the course of company business, the judgment was not apportioned among the defendants.

      In addition to the judgment discussed above, the Company and its subsidiaries are also subject to other legal proceedings. All such proceedings, taken together, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is also subject to a variety of legal actions for personal injury or property damage arising in the ordinary course of its business, most of which are covered by liability insurance. While the resolution of all matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of such legal proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, financial position or results of operations.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

     FIN 46

      In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46. This Interpretation was revised in December 2003. The objective of this Interpretation is to provide guidance on how to identify a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and determine when the assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests, and results of operations of a VIE need to be included in a company’s consolidated financial statements. A company that holds a variable interest in an entity will need to consolidate the entity if the company’s interest in the VIE is such that the company will absorb a majority of the VIEs expected losses and/or receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, if they occur. FIN 46 also requires additional disclosure by primary beneficiaries and other significant variable interest holders. The disclosure provisions of this Interpretation became effective upon issuance in January 2003. The

104


Table of Contents

consolidation requirements of this Interpretation applied immediately to VIEs created after January 31, 2003 and no later than the end of the first fiscal year or interim period ending after March 15, 2004 for public companies with non-special purpose entities that were created prior to February 1, 2003. The consolidation requirements of this Interpretation were applicable to special purpose entities no later than the end of the first fiscal year or interim period ending after December 15, 2003.

      The Company evaluated all of its pre-existing joint venture relationships in order to determine whether the entities are VIEs and whether the Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary or whether it holds a significant variable interest. Effective January 1, 2004, the Company consolidated five entities that were previously accounted for under the equity method. Four of these entities represent investments in undeveloped land located in Round Rock, Texas; Opelika, Alabama; Jackson, Mississippi and Monroe, Louisiana, with combined real estate balances of $6.0 million as of December 31, 2004, and liabilities of $0.8 million of which $0.7 million is owed to the Company. The other entity consolidated is an operating shopping center property located in Martinsville, Virginia, in which DDR has a 50% interest. At December 31, 2004, this joint venture had advances payable to DDR of approximately $8.8 million with total real estate of $31.7 million and total debt of approximately $19.9 million, which is secured by the real estate assets of this entity and is non-recourse to the Company. The Company recorded a charge of $3.0 million in the first quarter of 2004 as a result of the adoption of this standard relating to the minority partner’s cumulative losses in excess of its cost basis in the Martinsville, Virginia joint venture (Note 2).

      In May 2004, the Company assumed all of the rights and obligations related to an independent trust (the “Grantor Trust”) from one of the Company’s joint venture entities in which the Company held a 50% interest. The Grantor Trust, a special purpose entity, owns tax exempt floating rate bonds which are serviced from incremental tax revenue generated on a shopping center development in Merriam, Kansas. The Company was determined to be the primary beneficiary of the Grantor Trust and consolidated the Grantor Trust’s assets and obligations assumed. As of December 31, 2004, the Grantor Trust has outstanding obligations totaling approximately $8.6 million and a receivable from the city of Merriam, Kansas of approximately $8.6 million. The Grantor Trust obligation is secured by a letter of credit guaranteed by the Company.

     Service Merchandise Joint Venture

      The Company holds a 25% economic interest in a VIE (“SM VIE”), in which the Company was not determined to be the primary beneficiary. In March 2002, the SM VIE acquired the designation rights to real estate assets owned and controlled by Service Merchandise Company, Inc. At December 31, 2004, this joint venture holds 63 fee simple, leasehold and ground lease interests previously owned by the Service Merchandise Company, Inc., including designation rights to 2 assets for which it has not obtained final title through the bankruptcy court. In total, these assets are located in 26 states across the United States. The SM VIE has total assets and total mortgage debt of approximately $177.5 million and $62.6 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004 and a note payable to DDR of approximately $15.4 million. In the unlikely event that all of the underlying assets of this entity had no value and all other owners failed to meet their obligations, the Company estimates that its maximum exposure to loss would approximate $27.7 million, primarily representing the net carrying value of the Company’s investment in and advances to this entity as of December 31, 2004. However, the Company expects to recover the recorded amount of its investment in this entity.

     Apex Phase III

      The company holds an 80% economic interest in a VIE (“Apex VIE”), in which the Company was determined to be the primary beneficiary. In January 2004, the Apex VIE was formed for the purpose of acquiring, developing and operating undeveloped land located in Apex, North Carolina. As of December 31, 2004, the VIE has total real estate assets of $8.5 million and total debt of approximately $8.4 million owed to the Company. The Apex VIE balance sheet and income statement are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.

105


Table of Contents

     SAB 104

      In December 2003, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”), “Revenue Recognition”, which amends SAB 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” SAB 104’s primary purpose is to rescind accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements, superceded as a result of the issuance of EITF 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” Additionally, SAB 104 rescinds the SEC’s Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements Frequently Asked Questions and Answers (the “FAQ”) issued with SAB 101 that had been codified in SEC Topic 13, “Revenue Recognition.” Selected portions of the FAQ have been incorporated into SAB 104. While the wording of SAB 104 has changed to reflect the issuance of EITF 00-21, the revenue recognition principles of SAB 101 remain largely unchanged by the issuance of SAB 104. The adoption of this bulletin did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

     EITF Issue 03-06

      In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final consensus regarding Issue 03-06, “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under SFAS 128”. The issue addresses a number of questions regarding the computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) by companies that have issued securities other than common stock that participate in dividends and earnings of the issuing entity. Such securities are contractually entitled to receive dividends when and if the entity declares dividends on common stock. The issue also provides further guidance in applying the two-class method of calculating EPS once it is determined that a security is participating. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. This consensus is effective for the period ended June 30, 2004 and should be applied by restating previously reported EPS. The adoption of this consensus did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and per share amounts or cash flows.

     FAS 123R Stock-Based Compensation

      In October 2004, the FASB delayed the effective date of its proposed standard, “Share-Based Payment.” Public companies with calendar year-ends are required to adopt the provisions of the standard effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005, rather than January 1, 2005 as originally proposed. The Company expects to adopt FAS 123R on July 1, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of this proposed new standard, but does not expect it to materially impact its financial position, results of operations, cash flows or its future compensation strategies.

 
Item 7a. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

      The Company’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk. The Company’s debt, excluding joint venture debt, is summarized as follows:

                                                                 
December 31, 2004 December 31, 2003


Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average Average
Amount Maturity Interest Percentage Amount Maturity Interest Percentage
(Millions) (Years) Rate of Total (Millions) (Years) Rate of Total








Fixed Rate Debt (1)
  $ 2,167.1       6.3       5.9 %     79.8 %   $ 1,436.5       6.2       5.9 %     69.1 %
Variable Rate Debt (1)
  $ 549.3       1.8       3.5 %     20.2 %   $ 641.0       2.0       2.4 %     30.9 %


(1)  Adjusted to reflect the $80 million and $130 million of variable rate debt, which was swapped to a fixed rate at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $60 million and $100 million of fixed rate debt, which was swapped to a variable rate at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

106


Table of Contents

     The Company’s joint ventures’ fixed rate indebtedness, including $75 million and $93 million of variable rate debt which was swapped to a weighted average fixed rate of approximately 5.5% and 5.6%, respectively, is summarized as follows (in millions):

                                                                 
December 31, 2004 December 31, 2003


Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted
Joint Company’s Average Average Joint Company’s Average Average
Venture Proportionate Maturity Interest Venture Proportionate Maturity Interest
Debt Share (Years) Rate Debt Share (Years) Rate








Fixed Rate Debt
  $ 1,164.2     $ 284.5       5.1       5.2 %   $ 869.6     $ 252.4       5.5       5.8 %
Variable Rate Debt
  $ 639.2     $ 136.3       1.4       4.1 %   $ 451.6     $ 116.1       1.5       3.6 %

      The Company intends to utilize variable rate indebtedness available under its revolving credit facilities and construction loans in order to initially fund future acquisitions, developments and expansions of shopping centers. Thus, to the extent the Company incurs additional variable rate indebtedness, its exposure to increases in interest rates in an inflationary period would increase. The Company believes, however, that in no event would increases in interest expense as a result of inflation significantly impact the Company’s distributable cash flow.

      The interest rate risk on $80 million and $130 million of consolidated floating rate debt at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $75 million and $93 million of joint venture floating rate debt at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, of which $16.7 million and $21.4 million is the Company’s proportionate share, has been mitigated through the use of interest rate swap agreements (the “Swaps”) with major financial institutions. The Company is exposed to credit risk, in the event of non-performance by the counter-parties to the Swaps. The Company believes it mitigates its credit risk by entering into these Swaps with major financial institutions. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s two fixed rate interest swaps had a fair value which represented an asset of $0.2 million, one of which carries a notional amount of $50 million and one of which carries a notional amount of $30 million and converts variable rate debt to a fixed rate of 2.8% and 2.84%, respectively. At December 31, 2003, the Company’s three fixed rate interest swaps had a fair value which represented a liability of $0.4 million, two of which carry a notional amount of $50 million and one carries a notional amount of $30 million and converts variable rate debt to a fixed rate of 2.51%, 2.82% and 2.94%, respectively. At December 31, 2003, the Company had two variable rate interest swaps, which carried notional amounts of $60 million and $40 million, respectively. The $40 million swap was terminated at maturity in December 2004. At December 31, 2004, the $60 million swap had a fair value which represented an asset of $2.3 million and converted fixed rate debt to a variable rate of 4.3%. At December 31, 2003 these two swaps had a fair value that represented an asset of $5.6 million and converted fixed rate debt to a variable rate of 3.0%.

      The Company’s joint venture interest rate swaps had a fair value which represented an asset of $0.5 million and a liability of $0.7 million, of which $0.1 million and $0.2 million was the Company’s proportionate share at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. At December 31, 2004, these swaps carry notional amounts of $55 million and $20 million and converted variable rate debt to a fixed rate of 5.78% and 4.8%, respectively. At December 31, 2003, these swaps carry notional amounts of $55 million and $38 million and converted variable rate debt to a fixed rate of 5.78% and 6.603%, respectively. One of the Company’s joint ventures, the MDT Joint Venture, entered into fixed rate interest swaps, which carry notional amounts of $59.1 million and $9.1 million, of which the Company’s proportionate share was $8.6 million and $1.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively. These swaps converted variable rate debt to a weighted average fixed rate of 6.2%. As the joint venture has not elected hedge accounting for this derivative, it is marked to market with the adjustments flowing through its income statement. The fair value of the swaps referred to above were calculated based upon expected changes in future LIBOR rates.

      The fair value of the Company’s fixed rate debt adjusted to: i) include the $80 million and $130 million which was swapped to a fixed rate at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively; ii) exclude the $60 million and $100 million which was swapped to a variable rate at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively; iii) include the Company’s proportionate share of the joint venture fixed rate debt; and iv) include the Company’s proportionate share of $16.7 million and $21.4 million which was swapped to a fixed rate at December 31, 2004 and 2003,

107


Table of Contents

respectively, and an estimate of the effect of a 100 point decrease in market interest rates, is summarized as follows (in millions):
                                                 
December 31, 2004 December 31, 2003


100 100
Basis Point Basis Point
Decrease in Decrease in
Carrying Fair Market Interest Carrying Fair Market Interest
Value Value Rates Value Value Rates






Company’s fixed rate debt
  $ 2,167.1     $ 2,226.8 (1)   $ 2,334.5 (3)   $ 1,436.5     $ 1,510.8 (1)   $ 1,585.4 (3)
Company’s proportionate share of joint venture fixed rate debt
  $ 284.5     $ 289.9 (2)   $ 300.5 (4)   $ 252.4     $ 269.7 (2)   $ 281.2 (4)


(1)  Includes the fair value of interest rate swaps which was an asset of $0.2 million and a liability of $0.4 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
 
(2)  Includes the Company’s proportionate share of the fair value of interest rate swaps which was an asset of $0.1 million and a liability of $0.2 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
 
(3)  Includes the fair value of interest rate swaps which was a liability of $0.5 million at December 31, 2003.
 
(4)  Includes the Company’s proportionate share of the fair value of interest rate swaps which was a liability of $0.2 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003.

     The sensitivity to changes in interest rates of the Company’s fixed rate debt was determined utilizing a valuation model based upon factors that measure the net present value of such obligations which arise from the hypothetical estimate as discussed above.

      Further, a 100 basis point increase in short term market interest rates at December 31, 2004 and 2003 would result in an increase in interest expense of approximately $5.5 million and $6.4 million, respectively, for the Company and $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, representing the Company’s proportionate share of the joint ventures’ interest expense relating to variable rate debt outstanding, for the respective periods. The estimated increase in interest expense for the year does not give effect to possible changes in the daily balance for the Company’s or joint ventures’ outstanding variable rate debt.

      The Company also has made advances to several partnerships in the form of notes receivable that accrue interest at rates ranging from 6.9% to 12%. Maturity dates range from payment on demand to June 2020. The following table summarizes the aggregate notes receivable, the percentage at fixed rates with the remainder at variable rates, and the effect of a 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates. The estimated increase in interest income does not give effect to possible changes in the daily outstanding balance of the variable rate loan receivables.

                 
December 31,

2004 2003
(Millions) (Millions)


Total notes receivable
  $ 44.4     $ 28.0  
% Fixed rate loans
    69.5 %     7.9 %
Fair value of fixed rate loans
  $ 45.8     $ 2.1  
Impact on fair value of 100 basis point decrease in market
interest rates
  $ 47.0     $ 2.1  

      The Company and its joint ventures intend to continuously monitor and actively manage interest costs on their variable rate debt portfolio and may enter into swap positions based on market fluctuations. In addition, the Company believes that it has the ability to obtain funds through additional equity and/or debt offerings, including the issuance of medium term notes and joint venture capital. Accordingly, the cost of obtaining such protection agreements in relation to the Company’s access to capital markets will continue to be evaluated. The Company has not, and does not plan to, enter into any derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had no other material exposure to market risk.

108


Table of Contents

Item 8.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

      The response to this item is included in a separate section at the end of this report beginning on page F-1.

 
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

      None.

Item 9A.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     Disclosure Controls and Procedures

      The Company has evaluated the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures to determine whether they are effective in ensuring that the disclosure of required information is timely made in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. This evaluation was made under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. The CEO and CFO have concluded, based on their review, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined at Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

     Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Management assessed the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on those criteria, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004.

      Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included in Part II; Item 8 of this annual report on Form 10-K.

     Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

      During the three month period ended December 31, 2004, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.     OTHER INFORMATION

      None.

109


Table of Contents

PART III

 
Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

      During 2003, the Board of Directors adopted the following corporate governance documents:

  •  Corporate Governance Guidelines, which guide the Board of Directors in the performance of its responsibilities to serve the best interests of the Company and its shareholders;
 
  •  Written charters of the Audit Committee, Executive Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee;
 
  •  Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers that applies to the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, controllers, treasurer, and chief internal auditor, if any, of the Company; and
 
  •  Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that governs the actions and working relationships of the Company’s employees, officers and directors with current and potential customers, consumers, fellow employees, competitors, government and self-regulatory agencies, investors, the public, the media, and anyone else with whom the Company has or may have contact.

      Copies of the Company’s corporate governance documents are available on the Company’s website, www.ddr.com, under “Investor Relations” and will be provided, free of charge, to any shareholder who requests a copy by calling Michelle M. Dawson, Vice President of Investor Relations at (216) 755-5455, or by writing to Developers Diversified Realty Corporation, Investor Relations at 3300 Enterprise Parkway, Beachwood, Ohio 44122.

      Certain other information required by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the information under the headings “Proposal Two: Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Proposal Two: Election of Directors — Corporate Governance — Code of Ethics” contained in the Company’s Proxy Statement in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 10, 2005, and the information under the heading “Executive Officers” in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

      Incorporated herein by reference to the “Executive Compensation” section of the Company’s Proxy Statement in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 10, 2005.

110


Table of Contents

 
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

      Incorporated herein by reference to the “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” section of the Company’s Proxy Statement in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 10, 2005.

      The following table sets forth the number of securities issued and outstanding under the Company’s existing equity compensation plans, as of December 31, 2004, as well as the weighted average exercise price of outstanding options.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

                         
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
Number of securities to Weighted-average equity compensation
be issued upon exercise exercise price of plans (excluding
of outstanding options, outstanding options, securities reflected in
Plan category warrants and rights warrants and rights column (a))




(a) (b) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
    1,976,146 (2)   $ 26.00       3,322,678 (4)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (3)
    87,666     $ 18.09       N/A  
     
     
     
 
Total
    2,063,812     $ 25.66       3,322,678 (4)


(1)  Includes information related to the Company’s 1992 Employee’s Share Option Plan, 1996 Equity Based Award Plan, 1998 Equity Based Award Plan, 2002 Equity Based Award Plan and 2004 Equity Based Award Plan. Does not include 666,666 shares reserved for issuance under performance units agreements.
 
(2)  Does not include 202,198 shares of restricted stock as these shares have been reflected in the Company’s total shares outstanding.
 
(3)  Represents options issued to directors of the Company. The options granted to the directors were at the fair market value at the date of grant and vest over a three-year period.
 
(4)  Shares may be issued upon the exercise of options or in the form of restricted shares, share appreciation rights, deferred shares, share purchase rights and other share-based awards as set forth in the applicable plan.

 
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

      Incorporated herein by reference to the “Certain Transactions” section of the Company’s Proxy Statement in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 10, 2005.

 
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

      Incorporated herein by reference to the “Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP” section of the Company’s Proxy Statement in connection with its annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 10, 2005.

111


Table of Contents

PART IV

 
Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

      a.) 1. Financial Statements

      The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
 
  Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.
 
  Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2004.
 
  Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2004.
 
  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2004.
 
  Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three years ended December 31, 2004
 
  Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

      2. Financial Statement Schedules

  The following financial statement schedules are filed herewith as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the registrant:

Schedule

      II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the three years ended December 31, 2004.

      III Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2004.

      Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or because the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.

      b.) Exhibits — The following exhibits are filed as part of or incorporated by reference into, this report:

112


Table of Contents

                     
Exhibit No.
Under Reg. Filed Herewith or
S-K Form 10-K Incorporated Herein by
Item 601 Exhibit No. Description Reference




  2       2.1     Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among Great Lake Holdings, LLC, Benderson Development Company, Inc., The Benderson Trusts, Certain Affiliates and the Company, dated as of March 31, 2004   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 10, 2004)
  2       2.2     Purchase and Sale Agreement between MPR Del Norte LP, S.E., MPR Vega Baja LP, S.E., MPR Fajarado LP, S.E., MPR Del Oeste LP, S.E. and MPR Guyama LP, S.E. and the Company dated November 2, 2004   Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on November 5, 2004)
  2       2.3     Purchase and Sale Agreement between CRV Rio Hondo LP, LLLP, CRV Del Atlantico LP, LLLP, CRV Rexville LP, LLLP, CRV Senorial LP, LLLP and CRV Hamilton Land Acquisition LP, LLLP and the Company dated November 2, 2004   Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on November 5, 2004)
  2       2.4     Purchase and Sale Agreement between CPR Del Sol LP, S.E., CPR Escorial LP, S.E., CPR Cayey LP, S.E., CPR Palma Real LP, S.E., CPR Isabela LP, S.E. and CPR San Germain LP, S.E. and the Company dated November 2, 2004   Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on November 5, 2004)
  3       3.1     Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  3       3.2     Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  3       3.3     Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  3       3.4     Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  3       3.5     Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  3       3.6     Sixth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company   Form S-4 Registration No. 333-117034 (Filed with the SEC on June 30, 2004)
  3       3.7     Seventh Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company   Form S-4 Registration No. 333-117034 (Filed with the SEC on June 30, 2004)

113


Table of Contents

                     
Exhibit No.
Under Reg. Filed Herewith or
S-K Form 10-K Incorporated Herein by
Item 601 Exhibit No. Description Reference




  3       3.8     Code of Regulations of the Company   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  4       4.1     Specimen Certificate for Common Shares   Form S-3 Registration No. 33-78778 (Filed with the SEC on May 10, 1994)
  4       4.2     Specimen Certificate for 8.60% Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares   Form 8-A Registration Statement (Filed with the SEC on March 21, 2002)
  4       4.3     Specimen Certificate for Depositary Shares Relating to 8.60% Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  4       4.4     Specimen Certificate for 8.0% Class G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares Statement   Form 8-A Registration (Filed with the SEC on March 25, 2003)
  4       4.5     Specimen Certificate for Depositary Shares Relating to 8.0% Class G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares   Form 8-A Registration Statement (Filed with the SEC on March 25, 2003)
  4       4.6     Specimen Certificate for 7 3/8% Class H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares   Form 8-A Registration Statement (Filed with the SEC on July 17, 2003)
  4       4.7     Specimen Certificate for Depositary Shares Relating to 7 3/8% Class H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares   Form 8-A Registration Statement (Filed with the SEC on July 17, 2003)
  4       4.8     Specimen Certificate for 7.50% Class I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares   Form 8-A Registration Statement (Filed with the SEC on May 4, 2004)
  4       4.9     Specimen Certificate for Depositary Shares Relating to 7.50% Class I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares   Form 8-A Registration Statement (Filed with the SEC on May 4, 2004)
  4       4.10     Indenture dated as of May 1, 1994 by and between the Company and Chemical Bank, as Trustee   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  4       4.11     Indenture dated as of May 1, 1994 by and between the Company and National City Bank, as Trustee (the “NCB Indenture”)   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  4       4.12     First Supplement to NCB Indenture   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  4       4.13     Second Supplement to NCB Indenture   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  4       4.14     Third Supplement to NCB Indenture   Form S-4 Registration No. 333-117034 (Filed with the SEC on June 30, 2004)
  4       4.15     Fourth Supplement to NCB Indenture   Form S-4 Registration No. 333-117034 (Filed with the SEC on June 30, 2004)
  4       4.16     Form of Fixed Rate Senior Medium-Term Note   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 30, 2000)
  4       4.17     Form of Floating Rate Senior Medium-Term Note   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 30, 2000)
  4       4.18     Form of Fixed Rate Subordinated Medium-Term Note   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 30, 2000)

114


Table of Contents

                     
Exhibit No.
Under Reg. Filed Herewith or
S-K Form 10-K Incorporated Herein by
Item 601 Exhibit No. Description Reference




  4       4.19     Form of Floating Rate Subordinated Medium-Term Note   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 30, 2000)
  4       4.20     Form of 3.875% Note due 2009   Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on January 22, 2004)
  4       4.21     Form of 5.25% Note due 2011   Form S-4 Registration No. 333-117034 (Filed with the SEC on June 30, 2004)
  4       4.22     Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 12, 2003 among the Company and Banc One Capital Markets, Inc., and other lenders named therein   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  4       4.23     First Amendment, dated as of May 13, 2004, to Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 12, 2003 among the Company and Banc One Capital Markets, Inc., and other lenders named therein   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-117550 (Filed with the SEC on July 21, 2004)
  4       4.24     Second Amendment, dated as of July 27, 2004, to Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 12, 2003 among the Company and Banc One Capital Markets, Inc., and other lenders named therein   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 9, 2004)
  4       4.25     Third Amendment, dated as of January 13, 2005, to Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of December 12, 2003 among the Company and Banc One Capital Markets, Inc., and other lenders named therein   Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on January 31, 2005)
  4       4.26     Credit Agreement dated as of March 13, 2003 among the Company and Banc of America Securities, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and other lenders named therein   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on June 24, 2003)
  4       4.27     Term Loan Credit Agreement dated as of May 20, 2004 among the Company and Banc One Capital Markets, Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC and other lenders named therein   Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on June 24, 2004)
  4       4.28     Form of Indemnification Agreement   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  4       4.29     Shareholder Rights Agreement dated as of May 26, 1999 between the Company and National City Bank   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 16, 1999)
  10       10.1     Registration Rights Agreement   Form S-11 Registration No. 33-54930 (Filed with the SEC on November 23, 1992)

115


Table of Contents

                     
Exhibit No.
Under Reg. Filed Herewith or
S-K Form 10-K Incorporated Herein by
Item 601 Exhibit No. Description Reference




  10       10.2     Stock Option Plan*   Form S-8 Registration No. 33-74562 (Filed with the SEC on January 28, 1994)
  10       10.3     Amended and Restated Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (filed with the SEC on April 2, 2001)
  10       10.4     Elective Deferred Compensation Plan*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  10       10.5     Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Equity Deferred Compensation Plan*   Form S-3 Registration No. 333-108361 (Filed with the SEC on August 29, 2003)
  10       10.6     Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Equity-Based Award Plan*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  10       10.7     Amended and Restated 1998 Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Equity-Based Award Plan*   Form S-8 Registration No. 333-76537 (Filed with the SEC on April 19, 1999)
  10       10.8     2002 Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Equity-Based Award Plan*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 14, 2002)
  10       10.9     2004 Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Equity-Based Award Plan*   Form S-8 Registration No. 333-117069 (Filed with the SEC on July 1, 2004)
  10       10.10     Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the 1996/1998/2002/2004 Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Equity-Based Award Plan*   Filed herewith
  10       10.11     Form of Incentive Stock Option Grant Agreement for Executive Officers under the 2004 Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Equity-Based Award Plan*   Filed herewith
  10       10.12     Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Agreement for Executive Officers under the 2004 Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Equity-Based Award Plan*   Filed herewith
  10       10.13     Form of Directors’ Restricted Shares Agreement, dated January 1, 2000*   Form S-11 Registration No. 333-76278 (Filed with SEC on January 4, 2002; see Exhibit 10(ff) therein)
  10       10.14     Performance Units Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2000, between the Company and Scott A. Wolstein*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 8, 2002)
  10       10.15     Performance Units Agreement, dated as of January 2, 2002, between the Company and Scott A. Wolstein*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 8, 2002)
  10       10.16     Performance Units Agreement, dated as of January 2, 2002, between the Company and David M. Jacobstein*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 15, 2002)
  10       10.17     Performance Units Agreement, dated as of January 2, 2002, between the Company and Daniel B. Hurwitz*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 15, 2002)

116


Table of Contents

                     
Exhibit No.
Under Reg. Filed Herewith or
S-K Form 10-K Incorporated Herein by
Item 601 Exhibit No. Description Reference




  10       10.18     Incentive Compensation Agreement, effective as of February 11, 1998, between the Company and Scott A. Wolstein*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 15, 2002)
  10       10.19     Employment Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 between the Company and Joan U. Allgood*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on April 2, 2002)
  10       10.20     Employment Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2002, between the Company and Timothy J. Bruce*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 12, 2003)
  10       10.21     Employment Agreement dated as of May 25, 1999 between the Company and Daniel B. Hurwitz*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 16, 1999)
  10       10.22     Employment Agreement dated as of April 21, 1999 between the Company and David M. Jacobstein*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 16, 1999)
  10       10.23     Employment Agreement dated as of March 1, 2000 between the Company and William H. Schafer*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on April 2, 2002)
  10       10.24     Employment Agreement dated as of December 6, 2001, between the Company and Scott A. Wolstein*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 8, 2002)
  10       10.25     Form of Change of Control Agreement dated as of March 24, 1999 between the Company and each of Joan U. Allgood and William H. Schafer*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 17, 1999)
  10       10.26     Form of Change of Control Agreement dated as of March 24, 1999 between the Company and Scott A. Wolstein*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on May 17, 1999)
  10       10.27     Change of Control Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2002, between the Company and Timothy J. Bruce*   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 12, 2003)
  10       10.28     Change of Control Agreement dated as of May 25, 1999 between the Company and Daniel B. Hurwitz*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 16, 1999)
  10       10.29     Change of Control Agreement as of May 17, 1999 between the Company and David M. Jacobstein*   Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Filed with the SEC on August 16, 1999)
  10       10.30     Form of Medium-Term Note Distribution Agreement   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 30, 2000)
  10       10.31     Program Agreement for Retail Value Investment Program, dated as of February 11, 1998, among Retail Value Management, Ltd., the Company and The Prudential Insurance Company of America   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)

117


Table of Contents

                     
Exhibit No.
Under Reg. Filed Herewith or
S-K Form 10-K Incorporated Herein by
Item 601 Exhibit No. Description Reference




  14       14.1     Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers   Annual Report on Form 10-K (Filed with the SEC on March 15, 2004)
  21       21.1     List of Subsidiaries   Filed herewith
  23       23.1     Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP   Filed herewith
  31       31.1     Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   Filed herewith
  31       31.2     Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934   Filed herewith
  32       32.1     Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350   Filed herewith
  32       32.2     Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350   Filed herewith
  99       99.1     Voting Agreement, dated October 4, 2002, between the Company and certain stockholders named therein   Current Report on Form 8-K (Filed with the SEC on October 9, 2002)

  Management contracts and compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit pursuant to Item 15(b) of Form 10-K.

118


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

  DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

  By:  /s/ Scott A. Wolstein

  Scott A. Wolstein, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 16, 2005

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 16th day of March, 2005.

             
 
/s/ Scott A. Wolstein

Scott A. Wolstein
  Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
 
/s/ William H. Schafer

William H. Schafer
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
   
 
/s/ Dean S. Adler

Dean S. Adler
  Director    
 
/s/ Terrance R. Ahern

Terrance R. Ahern
  Director    
 
/s/ Moshen Anvari

Moshen Anvari
  Director    
 
/s/ Robert H. Gidel

Robert H. Gidel
  Director    
 


Victor MacFarlane
  Director    
 
/s/ Craig Macnab

Craig Macnab
  Director    
 
/s/ Scott D. Roulston

Scott D. Roulston
  Director    
 
/s/ Barry A. Scholem

Barry A. Scholem
  Director    
             
 
/s/ William B. Summers, Jr.

William B. Summers, Jr.
  Director    

119


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

             
Page

Financial Statements:
       
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
    F-2  
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2004 and 2003
    F-4  
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three years ended December 31, 2004
    F-5  
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
    F-6  
 
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2004
    F-7  
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three years ended December 31, 2004
    F-8  
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    F-9  
 
 
Financial Statement Schedules:
       
   
 II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the three years ended December 31, 2004
    F-52  
   
III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation at December 31, 2004
    F-53  

      All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

      Financial statements of the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture companies have been omitted because each of the joint venture’s proportionate share of the income from continuing operations is less than 20% of the respective consolidated amount, and the investment in and advances to each joint venture is less than 20% of consolidated total assets.

F-1


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Developers Diversified Realty Corporation:

      We have completed an integrated audit of Developers Diversified Realty Corporation’s 2004 consolidated financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are presented below.

Consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(1) present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Developers Diversified Realty Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company, on April 1, 2004, adopted FIN 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities — an interpretation of ARB 51”, as interpreted.

Internal control over financial reporting

      Also, in our opinion, management’s assessment, included in “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” appearing under Item 9A, that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on management’s assessment and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal control over financial reporting includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.

      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in

F-2


Table of Contents

accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP  
 
Cleveland, Ohio  
March 15, 2005  

F-3


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)

                     
December 31,

2004 2003


ASSETS
               
Land
  $ 1,238,242     $ 821,893  
Buildings
    3,998,972       2,719,764  
Fixtures and tenant improvements
    120,350       90,384  
Construction in progress and land under development
    245,860       252,870  
     
     
 
      5,603,424       3,884,911  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (568,231 )     (458,213 )
     
     
 
   
Real estate, net
    5,035,193       3,426,698  
Cash and cash equivalents
    49,871       11,693  
Restricted cash
          99,340  
Accounts receivable, net
    84,843       76,509  
Notes receivable
    17,823       11,741  
Advances to and investments in joint ventures
    288,020       260,143  
Deferred charges, net
    14,159       12,292  
Other assets
    93,638       42,735  
     
     
 
    $ 5,583,547     $ 3,941,151  
     
     
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Unsecured indebtedness:
               
 
Senior notes
  $ 1,220,143     $ 838,996  
 
Variable rate term debt
    350,000       300,000  
 
Revolving credit facility
    60,000       171,000  
     
     
 
      1,630,143       1,309,996  
Secured indebtedness:
               
 
Revolving credit facility
          15,500  
 
Mortgage and other secured indebtedness
    1,088,547       757,635  
     
     
 
      1,088,547       773,135  
     
     
 
   
Total indebtedness
    2,718,690       2,083,131  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    103,256       98,046  
Dividends payable
    62,089       43,520  
Other liabilities
    89,258       54,946  
     
     
 
      2,973,293       2,279,643  
     
     
 
Minority equity interests
    23,666       24,543  
Operating partnership minority interests
    32,269       22,895  
     
     
 
      3,029,228       2,327,081  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 1)
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
   
Preferred shares (Note 12)
    705,000       535,000  
   
Common shares, without par value, $.10 stated value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 108,521,763 and 93,792,948 shares issued at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
    10,852       9,379  
   
Paid-in-capital
    1,933,433       1,301,232  
   
Accumulated distributions in excess of net income
    (92,290 )     (116,737 )
   
Deferred obligation
    10,265       8,336  
   
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)
    326       (541 )
   
Less: Unearned compensation-restricted stock
    (5,415 )     (3,892 )
 
Common shares in treasury at cost: 439,166 and 7,359,747 shares issued at December 31, 2004, and 2003, respectively
    (7,852 )     (118,707 )
     
     
 
      2,554,319       1,614,070  
     
     
 
    $ 5,583,547     $ 3,941,151  
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

                           
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



As adjusted
(Note 1)
Revenues from operations:
                       
 
Minimum rents
  $ 430,991     $ 337,381     $ 251,619  
 
Percentage and overage rents
    7,609       5,651       4,312  
 
Recoveries from tenants
    122,406       93,380       68,544  
 
Ancillary income
    3,325       2,347       1,914  
 
Other property related income
    4,300       911       1,584  
 
Management fee income
    14,626       10,647       10,145  
 
Development fee income
    2,311       1,446       2,229  
 
Other
    13,365       13,969       6,354  
     
     
     
 
      598,933       465,732       346,701  
     
     
     
 
Rental operation expenses:
                       
 
Operating and maintenance
    71,520       61,125       42,243  
 
Real estate taxes
    78,094       57,041       42,459  
 
General and administrative
    47,126       40,820       29,392  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    131,577       93,155       76,155  
     
     
     
 
      328,317       252,141       190,249  
     
     
     
 
      270,616       213,591       156,452  
     
     
     
 
Other income (expense):
                       
 
Interest income
    4,235       5,082       5,905  
 
Interest expense
    (129,659 )     (88,837 )     (75,754 )
 
Other expense
    (1,779 )     (10,119 )     (1,018 )
     
     
     
 
      (127,203 )     (93,874 )     (70,867 )
     
     
     
 
Income before equity in net income of joint ventures, gain on sale of joint venture interests, minority interests, income tax of taxable REIT subsidiaries and franchise taxes, discontinued operations, gain on disposition of real estate and cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    143,413       119,717       85,585  
Equity in net income of joint ventures
    40,895       44,967       32,769  
Gain on sale of joint venture interests
          7,950        
     
     
     
 
Income before minority interests, income tax of taxable REIT subsidiaries and franchise taxes, discontinued operations, gain on disposition of real estate and cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    184,308       172,634       118,354  
Minority interests:
                       
 
Minority equity interests
    (2,406 )     (1,360 )     (1,782 )
 
Preferred operating partnership minority interests
          (2,236 )     (18,338 )
 
Operating partnership minority interests
    (2,607 )     (1,769 )     (1,450 )
     
     
     
 
      (5,013 )     (5,365 )     (21,570 )
Income tax of taxable REIT subsidiaries and franchise taxes
    (1,469 )     (1,626 )     (742 )
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations
    177,826       165,643       96,042  
     
     
     
 
Discontinued operations:
                       
 
Income (loss) from operations
    1,734       226       (1,777 )
 
Gain on disposition of real estate, net
    8,561       460       4,276  
     
     
     
 
      10,295       686       2,499  
     
     
     
 
Income before gain on disposition of real estate and cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    188,121       166,329       98,541  
Gain on disposition of real estate
    84,642       73,932       3,429  
     
     
     
 
Income before cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    272,763       240,261       101,970  
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (3,001 )            
     
     
     
 
 
Net income
  $ 269,762     $ 240,261     $ 101,970  
     
     
     
 
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 219,056     $ 189,056     $ 69,368  
     
     
     
 
Per share data:
                       
Basic earnings per share data:
                       
 
Income from continuing operations
  $ 2.19     $ 2.30     $ 1.05  
 
Income from discontinued operations
    0.11       0.01       0.04  
 
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (0.03 )            
     
     
     
 
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.27     $ 2.31     $ 1.09  
     
     
     
 
Diluted earnings per share data:
                       
 
Income from continuing operations
  $ 2.17     $ 2.26     $ 1.03  
 
Income from discontinued operations
    0.10       0.01       0.04  
 
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (0.03 )            
     
     
     
 
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.24     $ 2.27     $ 1.07  
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in thousands)

                             
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Net income
  $ 269,762     $ 240,261     $ 101,970  
     
     
     
 
Other comprehensive income:
                       
 
Change in fair value of the effective portion of cash flow hedges
    867       47       7,586  
     
     
     
 
      867       47       7,586  
     
     
     
 
   
Net comprehensive income
  $ 270,629     $ 240,308     $ 109,556  
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts as adjusted, Note 1)
                                                                         
Accumulated
Accumulated Other Unearned
Distributions in Comprehensive Compensation – Treasury
Preferred Common Paid in Excess of Deferred Income/ Restricted Stock at
Shares Shares Capital Net Income Obligation (Loss) Stock Cost Total









Balance December 31, 2001
  $ 303,750     $ 6,609     $ 753,228     $ (130,436 )   $     $ (8,174 )   $ (1,753 )   $ (89,210 )   $ 834,014  
Issuance of 1,155,661 common shares for cash related to exercise of stock options and dividend reinvestment plan
          116       17,769                                     17,885  
Issuance of 120,208 common shares related to restricted stock plan
          12       2,380                         (1,914 )           478  
Vesting of restricted stock
                                        556             556  
Issuance of 1,747,378 common shares for cash – underwritten offering
          175       32,877                                     33,052  
Issuance of 2,512,778 common shares in exchange for real estate property
          251       48,989                                     49,240  
Issuance of 1,604,768 common shares in exchange for redemption of preferred operating partnership units
          161       31,939                                     32,100  
Issuance of 13,729 common shares upon exercise of put warrant
          1                                           1  
Issuance of Class F preferred shares for cash – underwritten offering
    150,000             (5,405 )                                   144,595  
Redemption of preferred shares
    (149,750 )           5,544       (5,544 )                             (149,750 )
Purchase of 547 common shares
                                              (11 )     (11 )
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps
                                  7,586                   7,586  
Net income
                      101,970                               101,970  
Dividends declared – common shares
                      (99,079 )                             (99,079 )
Dividends declared – preferred shares
                      (27,076 )                             (27,076 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balance, December 31, 2002
    304,000       7,325       887,321       (160,165 )           (588 )     (3,111 )     (89,221 )     945,561  
Issuance of 2,444,103 common shares for cash related to exercise of stock options and dividend reinvestment plan
          245       39,334             7,579                   (28,729 )     18,429  
Issuance of 103,139 common shares related to restricted stock plan
          9       2,271                         (1,825 )           455  
Vesting of restricted stock
                            757             1,044       (757 )     1,044  
Issuance of 17,998,079 common shares and 2,000,000 voting preferred shares associated with the JDN merger
    50,000       1,800       380,126                                     431,926  
Issuance of Class G and H preferred shares for cash – underwritten offerings
    385,000             (13,540 )                                   371,460  
Redemption of preferred operating partnership units and preferred shares
    (204,000 )           5,720       (10,710 )                             (208,990 )
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps
                                  47                   47  
Net income
                      240,261                               240,261  
Dividends declared – common shares
                      (145,077 )                             (145,077 )
Dividends declared – preferred shares
                      (41,046 )                             (41,046 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balance, December 31, 2003
    535,000       9,379       1,301,232       (116,737 )     8,336       (541 )     (3,892 )     (118,707 )     1,614,070  
Issuance of 457,378 common shares for cash related to exercise of stock options and dividend reinvestment plan
          (27 )     (1,390 )                             6,323       4,906  
Issuance of 105,974 common shares related to restricted stock plan
                                        (2,956 )     1,861       (1,095 )
Vesting of restricted stock
                            1,929             1,433             3,362  
Issuance of 20,450,000 common shares for cash – underwritten offerings
          1,500       637,662                               97,587       736,749  
Redemption of 284,304 operating partnership units in exchange for common shares
                1,716                               5,084       6,800  
Issuance of Class I preferred shares for cash – underwritten offerings
    170,000             (5,787 )                                   164,213  
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps
                                  867                   867  
Net income
                      269,762                               269,762  
Dividends declared – common shares
                      (194,078 )                             (194,078 )
Dividends declared – preferred shares
                      (51,237 )                             (51,237 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balance, December 31, 2004
  $ 705,000     $ 10,852     $ 1,933,433     $ (92,290 )   $ 10,265     $ 326     $ (5,415 )   $ (7,852 )   $ 2,554,319  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

                                 
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Cash flow operating activities:
                       
 
Net income
  $ 269,762     $ 240,261     $ 101,970  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating activities
                       
   
Depreciation and amortization
    132,647       95,219       78,368  
   
Amortization of deferred finance costs
    7,300       6,514       3,832  
   
Equity in net income of joint ventures
    (40,895 )     (44,967 )     (32,769 )
   
Gain on sale of joint venture interests
          (7,950 )      
   
Cash distributions from joint ventures
    38,724       41,946       37,481  
   
Preferred operating partnership minority interest expense
          2,236       18,338  
   
Operating partnership minority interest expense
    2,607       1,769       1,450  
   
Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate investments and impairment charge, net
    (92,616 )     (71,752 )     (2,975 )
   
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    3,001              
   
Net change in accounts receivable
    (6,611 )     (5,825 )     (8,698 )
   
Net change in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    (15,048 )     (6,906 )     12,107  
   
Net change in other operating assets and liabilities
    (6,645 )     12,584       1,635  
     
     
     
 
     
Total adjustments
    22,464       22,868       108,769  
     
     
     
 
     
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
    292,226       263,129       210,739  
     
     
     
 
Cash flow from investing activities:
                       
 
Real estate developed or acquired, net of liabilities assumed
    (1,907,934 )     (284,003 )     (316,388 )
 
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
    99,340       (99,340 )      
 
Consolidation of joint venture interests
    251       348        
 
Equity contributions to joint ventures
    (11,433 )     (96,438 )     (20,658 )
 
(Advances to) repayment of joint ventures
    (7,355 )     (29,540 )     550  
 
Repayment (issuance) of notes receivable, net
    2,228       8,764       (21,559 )
 
Proceeds resulting from contribution of properties to joint ventures and repayments of advances from affiliates
    635,445       388,527       25,108  
 
Proceeds from sale and refinancing of joint venture interests
    39,342       69,344       20,547  
 
Proceeds from disposition of real estate and real estate investments
    15,515       26,092       32,403  
     
     
     
 
     
Net cash flow used for investing activities
    (1,134,601 )     (16,246 )     (279,997 )
     
     
     
 
Cash flow from financing activities:
                       
 
Proceeds from (repayment of) revolving credit facilities, net
    (126,500 )     (488,500 )     44,250  
 
Proceeds from borrowings from term loans, net
    50,000       300,000        
 
Proceeds from construction loans and other mortgage debt
    105,394       252,452       188,921  
 
Principal payments on rental property debt
    (203,255 )     (338,678 )     (51,456 )
 
Repayment of senior notes
    (140,000 )     (100,000 )     (28,000 )
 
Proceeds from issuance of medium term notes, net of underwriting commissions and $421 and $524 of offering expenses paid in 2004 and 2003, respectively
    520,003       297,130       17,021  
 
Payment of deferred finance costs (bank borrowings)
    (4,120 )     (6,380 )     (5,316 )
 
Proceeds from the issuance of common shares, net of underwriting commissions and $609 and $119 of offering expenses paid in 2004 and 2002, respectively
    736,749             33,052  
 
Proceeds from the issuance of preferred shares, net of underwriting commissions and $432, $1,412 and $540 of offering expenses paid in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively
    164,213       371,460       144,595  
 
Redemption of preferred shares
          (204,000 )     (149,750 )
 
Redemption of preferred operating partnership units
          (180,000 )      
 
Repurchase of operating partnership minority interests
                (2,269 )
 
Proceeds from the issuance of common shares in conjunction with exercise of stock options, 401(k) plan, dividend reinvestment plan and restricted stock plan
    7,170       20,188       18,919  
 
Purchase of treasury stock
                (11 )
 
Distributions to preferred and operating partnership minority interests
    (2,354 )     (7,253 )     (20,555 )
 
Dividends paid
    (226,747 )     (167,980 )     (122,841 )
     
     
     
 
     
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities
    880,553       (251,561 )     66,560  
     
     
     
 
       
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    38,178       (4,678 )     (2,698 )
 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
    11,693       16,371       19,069  
     
     
     
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
  $ 49,871     $ 11,693     $ 16,371  
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-8


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 
Nature of Business

      Developers Diversified Realty Corporation, its subsidiaries and related real estate joint ventures (the “Company” or “DDR”), are primarily engaged in the business of acquiring, expanding, owning, developing, managing and operating shopping centers, enclosed malls and business centers. The Company’s shopping centers are typically anchored by two or more national tenant anchors (Wal-Mart, Kohl’s, Target), home improvement stores (Home Depot, Lowe’s) and two or more medium sized big-box tenants (Bed Bath & Beyond, T.J. Maxx/ Marshalls, Best Buy, Ross Stores). At December 31, 2004, the Company owned or had interests in 436 shopping centers in 44 states and 32 business centers in 11 states. The tenant base primarily includes national and regional retail chains and local retailers. Consequently, the Company’s credit risk is concentrated in the retail industry.

      Revenues derived from the Company’s largest tenant, Wal-Mart, aggregated 4.0%, 4.9% and 4.6% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The total percentage of Company-owned gross leasable area (“GLA” (Unaudited)) attributed to Wal-Mart was 7.3% at December 31, 2004. The Company’s ten largest tenants comprised 19.4%, 23.1% and 20.5% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, including revenues reported within discontinued operations. Management believes the Company’s portfolio is diversified in terms of location of its shopping centers and its tenant profile. Adverse changes in general or local economic conditions could result in the inability of some existing tenants to meet their lease obligations and could otherwise adversely affect the Company’s ability to attract or retain tenants. During the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, certain national and regional retailers experienced financial difficulties and several filed for protection under bankruptcy laws. The Company does not believe that these bankruptcies will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 
Principles of Consolidation

      The Company consolidates certain entities if it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary in a variable interest entity (“VIE’s”), as defined in FIN No. 46R “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46.”) For those entities that are not VIE’s the Company also consolidates entities in which it has financial and operating control. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in real estate joint ventures and companies for which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over, but does not have financial or operating control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the Company’s share of the earnings (or loss) of these joint ventures and companies is included in consolidated net income.

F-9


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

 
Statement of Cash Flows and Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Information

      Non-cash investing and financing activities are summarized as follows (in millions):

                         
For the Year Ended
December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Issuance of common shares and preferred shares in conjunction with the acquisition of shopping centers including the merger of JDN
  $     $ 431.9     $ 49.2  
Contribution of net assets to joint ventures
    70.7       52.0       23.6  
Consolidation of the net assets (excluding mortgages as disclosed below) of joint ventures and minority equity investment previously reported on the equity method of accounting
    10.2       10.4       152.8  
Mortgages assumed, shopping center acquisitions, merger of JDN and consolidation of joint ventures and a minority equity investment
    458.7       660.0       9.7  
Liabilities assumed with the acquisition of shopping centers and the merger of JDN
    46.9       43.7        
Dividends declared, not paid
    62.1       43.5       25.4  
Fair value of interest rate swaps
    2.6       6.1       7.7  
Warrant exercise and share issuance for preferred operating partnership unit redemption
                32.1  
Share issuance for operating partnership unit redemption
    6.8              
Accounts payable related to construction in progress
          3.8       3.2  

      The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2003, the Company had restricted cash of $99.3 million, which was being held in a qualified escrow account for the purposes of completing a like-kind exchange transaction, of which $4.8 million was utilized in 2004 and the remaining funds were released in January 2004 due to the decision to no longer pursue a like-kind exchange.

      The transactions above did not provide or use cash in the years presented and, accordingly, they are not reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

 
Real Estate

      Real estate assets held for investment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, which, in the opinion of management, is not in excess of the individual property’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows, including estimated proceeds from disposition.

      Depreciation and amortization are provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

     
Buildings
  Useful lives, ranging from 30 to 31.5 years
Furniture/ Fixtures and Tenant Improvements
  Useful lives, which approximate lease terms, where applicable

      Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Significant renovations, which improve or extend the life of the assets, are capitalized. Included in land at December 31, 2004, was undeveloped real estate, generally outlots or expansion pads adjacent to shopping centers owned by the Company (excluding shopping centers owned through joint ventures), and excess land of approximately 490 acres.

      Construction in progress includes shopping center developments and significant expansions and redevelopments. The Company capitalizes interest on funds used for the construction, expansion or redevelopment of

F-10


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

shopping centers, including funds advanced to or invested in joint ventures with qualifying development activities. Capitalization of interest ceases when construction activities are substantially completed and the property is available for occupancy by tenants. In addition, the Company capitalized certain internal construction administration costs of $5.7 million, $5.1 million and $4.3 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

 
Purchase Price Accounting

      Upon acquisition of properties, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and, if determined to be material, identified intangible assets generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships. The Company allocates the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a gross basis based on their relative fair values at the date of acquisition pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, Business Combinations. In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired, the Company considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence, marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information. Depending upon the size of the acquisition, the Company may engage an outside appraiser to perform a valuation of the tangible and intangible assets acquired. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

      Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases. At December 31, 2004, the below market leases aggregated $4.2 million and there were no above market leases. At December 31, 2003, there were no above or below market lease assets or obligations.

      The total amount of intangible assets allocated to in-place lease values and tenant relationship values is based upon management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of the acquired lease portfolio and the Company’s overall relationship with anchor tenants. Factors considered in the allocation of these values include the nature of the existing relationship with the tenant, the expectation of lease renewals, the estimated carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases, among other factors. Estimated carrying costs include real estate taxes, insurance, other property operating costs and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, based upon management’s assessment of specific market conditions.

      The value of in-place leases including origination costs is amortized to expense over the estimated weighted average remaining initial term of the acquired lease portfolio. The value of tenant relationship intangibles is amortized to expense over the estimated initial and renewal terms of the lease portfolio; however, no amortization period for intangible assets will exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building.

      Intangible assets associated with property acquisitions are included in other assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

F-11


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

 
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

      Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144 (“SFAS 144”), “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets.” If an asset is held for sale, it is stated at the lower of its carrying value or fair value less cost to sell. The determination of undiscounted cash flows requires significant estimates made by management and considers the expected course of action at the balance sheet date. Subsequent changes in estimated undiscounted cash flows arising from changes in anticipated actions could impact the determination of whether an impairment exists.

      Management reviews its long-lived assets used in operations for impairment when there is an event or change in circumstances that indicates an impairment in value. An asset is considered impaired when the undiscounted future cash flows are not sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value. If such impairment is present, an impairment loss is recognized based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value. The Company records impairment losses and reduces the carrying amounts of assets held for sale when the carrying amounts exceed the estimated selling proceeds less the costs to sell.

 
Deferred Charges

      Costs incurred in obtaining long-term financing are included in deferred charges in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related debt agreements, which approximates the effective interest method. Such amortization is reflected as interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

 
Revenue Recognition

      Minimum rents from tenants are recognized using the straight-line method over the lease term of the respective leases. Percentage and overage rents are recognized after a tenant’s reported sales have exceeded the applicable sales breakpoint set forth in the applicable lease. Revenues associated with tenant reimbursements are recognized in the period in which the expenses are incurred based upon the tenant lease provision. Management fees are recorded in the period earned based on a percentage of collected rent at the properties under management. Ancillary and other property related income, which includes the leasing of vacant space to temporary tenants, is recognized in the period earned. Lease termination fees are included in other income and recognized and earned upon termination of a tenant’s lease.

 
Accounts Receivable

      Accounts receivable, other than straight-line rents receivable and master lease arrangements, are expected to be collected within one year and are net of any estimated unrecoverable amounts of approximately $12.4 million and $13.7 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, straight-line rents receivable, net of a provision for uncollectible amounts of $1.8 million and $1.5 million, aggregated $27.4 million and $21.6 million, respectively. Included in accounts receivable is approximately $3.2 million related to master lease obligation from Benderson Development Company and related entities (“Benderson”) at December 31, 2004.

 
Disposition of Real Estate and Real Estate Investments

      Disposition of real estate relates to the sale of outlots and land adjacent to existing shopping centers, shopping center properties and real estate investments. Gains from sales are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 66 “Accounting for Real Estate Sales,” provided that various criteria relating to the terms of sale and any subsequent involvement by the Company with the properties sold are met.

F-12


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 144 effective January 1, 2002. It retains the basic provisions for presenting discontinued operations in the income statement but broadened the scope to include a component of an entity rather than a segment of a business. Pursuant to the definition of a component of an entity in the SFAS 144, assuming no significant continuing involvement, the sale of a retail or industrial operating property is now considered a discontinued operation. In addition, the operations from properties classified as held for sale are also considered a discontinued operation. The Company generally considers assets to be held for sale when the transaction has been approved by the appropriate level of management and there are no known significant contingencies relating to the sale such that the property sale within one year is considered probable. Accordingly, the results of operations of properties disposed of, or classified as held for sale after January 1, 2002, for which the Company has no significant continuing involvement are reflected as discontinued operations. Interest expense, which is specifically identifiable to the property, is used in the computation of interest expense attributable to discontinued operations. Consolidated interest at the corporate level is allocated to discontinued operations pursuant to the methods prescribed under EITF 87-24, based on the proportion of net assets disposed.

 
General and Administrative Expenses

      General and administrative expenses include certain internal leasing and legal salaries and related expenses directly associated with the releasing of existing space, which are charged to operations as incurred.

 
Stock Option and Other Equity-Based Plans

      The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans, which are described more fully in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company applies APB 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, the Company does not recognize compensation cost for stock options when the option exercise price equals or exceeds the market value on the date of the grant. No stock-based employee compensation cost for stock options is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to or in excess of the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Company records compensation expense related to its restricted stock plan and its performance unit awards. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure an amendment of SFAS No. 123,” to stock-based employee compensation (in thousands, except per share data).

                           
Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Net income, as reported
  $ 269,762     $ 240,261     $ 101,970  
Add: Stock based employee compensation included in reported net income
    6,308       5,017       2,215  
Deduct: Total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards
    (5,062 )     (5,200 )     (2,515 )
     
     
     
 
    $ 271,008     $ 240,078     $ 101,670  
     
     
     
 
Earnings per share:
                       
 
Basic — as reported
  $ 2.27     $ 2.31     $ 1.09  
     
     
     
 
 
Basic — pro forma
  $ 2.28     $ 2.31     $ 1.08  
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted — as reported
  $ 2.24     $ 2.27     $ 1.07  
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted — pro forma
  $ 2.25     $ 2.27     $ 1.07  
     
     
     
 

F-13


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

 
Interest and Real Estate Taxes

      Interest and real estate taxes incurred during the development and significant expansion of real estate assets held for investment are capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the building. Interest paid during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, aggregated $133.8 million, $98.2 million and $84.7 million, respectively, of which $9.9 million, $11.5 million and $9.2 million, respectively, was capitalized.

 
Goodwill

      Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS 142 requires that intangible assets not subject to amortization and goodwill be tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Amortization of goodwill, including such assets associated with joint ventures acquired in past business combinations, ceased upon adoption. Goodwill is included in the balance sheet caption Advances to and Investments in Joint Ventures in the amount of $5.4 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. The Company evaluated the goodwill related to its joint venture investments for impairment and determined that it was not impaired as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.

 
Intangible Assets

      Finite lived intangible assets comprised of management contracts, associated with the Company’s acquisition of a joint venture, are stated at cost less amortization calculated on a straight-line basis over 15 years. Intangible assets, net, are included in the balance sheet caption Advances to and Investments in Joint Ventures in the amount of $4.7 million and $4.2 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 15-year life approximates the expected turnover rate of the original management contracts acquired.

      The estimated amortization expense associated with the management company finite lived intangible asset for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is approximately $0.3 million per year.

 
Advances to and Investments in Joint Ventures

      To the extent that the Company contributes assets to a joint venture, the Company’s investment in the joint venture is recorded at the Company’s cost basis in the assets, which were contributed to the joint venture. To the extent that the Company’s cost basis is different than the basis reflected at the joint venture level, the basis difference is amortized over the life of the related asset and included in the Company’s share of equity in net income of joint venture. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position 78-9 “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures” paragraph 30, the Company recognizes gains on the contribution of real estate to joint ventures, relating solely to the outside partner’s interest, to the extent the economic substance of the transaction is a sale. The Company continually evaluates its advances to and investments in joint ventures for other than temporary declines in market value. Any decline that is not expected to recover in the next twelve months is considered an other than temporary impairment and recorded. The Company has determined that these investments are not impaired as of December 31, 2004.

 
Treasury Stock

      The Company’s share repurchases are reflected as treasury stock utilizing the cost method of accounting and are presented as a reduction to consolidated shareholders’ equity.

F-14


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

 
New Accounting Standards
 
FIN 46

      In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46. This Interpretation was revised in December 2003. The objective of this Interpretation is to provide guidance on how to identify a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and determine when the assets, liabilities, non-controlling interests, and results of operations of a VIE need to be included in a company’s consolidated financial statements. A company that holds a variable interest in an entity will need to consolidate the entity if the company’s interest in the VIE is such that the company will absorb a majority of the VIEs expected losses and/or receive a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, if they occur. FIN 46 also requires additional disclosure by primary beneficiaries and other significant variable interest holders. The disclosure provisions of this Interpretation became effective upon issuance in January 2003. The consolidation requirements of this Interpretation applied immediately to VIEs created after January 31, 2003 and no later than the end of the first fiscal year or interim period ending after March 15, 2004 for public companies with non-special purpose entities that were created prior to February 1, 2003. The consolidation requirements of this Interpretation were applicable to special purpose entities no later than the end of the first fiscal year or interim period ending after December 15, 2003.

      The Company evaluated all of its pre-existing joint venture relationships in order to determine whether the entities are VIEs and whether the Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary or whether it holds a significant variable interest. Effective January 1, 2004, the Company consolidated five entities that were previously accounted for under the equity method (Note 2).

      In May 2004, the Company assumed all of the rights and obligations related to an independent trust (the “Grantor Trust”) from one of the Company’s joint venture entities in which the Company held a 50% interest. The Grantor Trust, a special purpose entity, owns tax exempt floating rate bonds which are serviced from incremental tax revenue generated on a shopping center development in Merriam, Kansas. The Company was determined to be the primary beneficiary of the Grantor Trust and consolidated the Grantor Trust’s assets and obligations assumed. As of December 31, 2004, the Grantor Trust has outstanding obligations totaling approximately $8.6 million and a receivable from the city of Merriam, Kansas of approximately $8.6 million. The Grantor Trust obligation is secured by a letter of credit guaranteed by the Company.

 
Service Merchandise Joint Venture

      The Company holds a 25% economic interest in a VIE (“SM VIE”), in which the Company was not determined to be the primary beneficiary. In March 2002, the SM VIE acquired the designation rights to real estate assets owned and controlled by Service Merchandise Company, Inc. At December 31, 2004, this joint venture holds 63 fee simple, leasehold and ground lease interests previously owned by the Service Merchandise Company, Inc., including designation rights to 2 assets for which it has not obtained final title through the bankruptcy court. In total, these assets are located in 26 states across the United States. The SM VIE has total assets and total mortgage debt of approximately $177.5 million and $62.6 million, respectively, at December 31, 2004 and a note payable to DDR of approximately $15.4 million. In the unlikely event that all of the underlying assets of this entity had no value and all other owners failed to meet their obligations, the Company estimates that its maximum exposure to loss would approximate $27.7 million, primarily representing the net carrying value of the Company’s investment in and advances to this entity as of December 31, 2004. However, the Company expects to recover the recorded amount of its investment in this entity.

 
Apex Phase III

      The Company holds an 80% economic interest in a VIE (“Apex VIE”), in which the Company was determined to be the primary beneficiary. In January 2004, the Apex VIE was formed for the purpose of

F-15


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

acquiring, developing and operating undeveloped land located in Apex, North Carolina. As of December 31, 2004, the VIE has total real estate assets of $8.5 million and total debt of approximately $8.4 million owed to the Company. The Apex VIE balance sheet and income statement are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 
SAB 104

      In December 2003, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (“SAB 104”), “Revenue Recognition”, which amends SAB 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” SAB 104’s primary purpose is to rescind accounting guidance contained in SAB 101 related to multiple element revenue arrangements, superceded as a result of the issuance of EITF 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” Additionally, SAB 104 rescinds the SEC’s Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements Frequently Asked Questions and Answers (the “FAQ”) issued with SAB 101 that had been codified in SEC Topic 13, “Revenue Recognition.” Selected portions of the FAQ have been incorporated into SAB 104. While the wording of SAB 104 has changed to reflect the issuance of EITF 00-21, the revenue recognition principles of SAB 101 remain largely unchanged by the issuance of SAB 104. The adoption of this bulletin did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 
EITF Issue 03-06

      In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final consensus regarding Issue 03-06, “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under SFAS 128”. The issue addresses a number of questions regarding the computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) by companies that have issued securities other than common stock that participate in dividends and earnings of the issuing entity. Such securities are contractually entitled to receive dividends when and if the entity declares dividends on common stock. The issue also provides further guidance in applying the two-class method of calculating EPS once it is determined that a security is participating. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. This consensus is effective for the period ended June 30, 2004 and should be applied by restating previously reported EPS. The adoption of this consensus did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and per share amounts or cash flows.

 
FAS 123R Stock-Based Compensation

      In October 2004, the FASB delayed the effective date of its proposed standard, “Share-Based Payment.” Public companies with calendar year-ends are required to adopt the provisions of the standard effective for periods beginning after June 15, 2005, rather than January 1, 2005 as originally proposed. The Company expects to adopt FAS 123R on July 1, 2005. The Company is currently evaluating the effects of this proposed new standard, but does not expect it to materially impact its financial position, results of operations, cash flows or its future compensation strategies.

 
Reclassification

      Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2003 and 2002 financial statements to conform to the 2004 presentation. These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations or cash flow for 2003 or 2002.

 
Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, the

F-16


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 
2.  Advances to and Investments in Joint Ventures

      Combined condensed financial information of the Company’s joint venture investments is summarized as follows (in thousands):

                 
December 31,

Combined Balance Sheets 2004 2003



Land
  $ 798,852     $ 519,846  
Buildings
    2,298,424       1,692,367  
Fixtures and tenant improvements
    42,922       24,985  
Construction in progress
    25,151       38,018  
     
     
 
      3,165,349       2,275,216  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (143,170 )     (118,755 )
     
     
 
Real estate, net
    3,022,179       2,156,461  
Receivables, net
    68,596       47,165  
Leasehold interests
    26,727       28,895  
Other assets
    96,264       83,776  
     
     
 
    $ 3,213,766     $ 2,316,297  
     
     
 
Mortgage debt
  $ 1,803,420     $ 1,321,117  
Amounts payable to DDR
    20,616       31,683  
Amounts payable to other partners
    46,161       32,121  
Other liabilities
    75,979       80,681  
     
     
 
      1,946,176       1,465,602  
Accumulated equity
    1,267,590       850,695  
     
     
 
    $ 3,213,766     $ 2,316,297  
     
     
 
Company’s proportionate share of accumulated equity
  $ 257,944     $ 204,431  
     
     
 

F-17


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

                         
For the Year Ended December 31,

Combined Statements of Operations 2004 2003 2002




Revenues from operations
  $ 339,446     $ 255,541     $ 201,303  
     
     
     
 
Rental operation expenses
    118,922       87,842       69,531  
Depreciation and amortization expense
    68,110       40,663       30,740  
Interest expense
    79,149       71,094       63,285  
     
     
     
 
      266,181       199,599       163,556  
     
     
     
 
Income before gain on sales of real estate and discontinued operations
    73,265       55,942       37,747  
Gain on sales of real estate
    4,787       569       6,138  
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations
    78,052       56,511       43,885  
     
     
     
 
Discontinued operations:
                       
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
    1,115       513       8,545  
Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax
    39,612       63,875       53,130  
     
     
     
 
      40,727       64,388       61,675  
     
     
     
 
Net income
  $ 118,779     $ 120,899     $ 105,560  
     
     
     
 
Company’s proportionate share of net income
  $ 42,150     $ 46,593     $ 34,724  
     
     
     
 

      The Company has made advances to several partnerships in the form of notes receivable and fixed rate loans, which accrue interest at rates ranging from 6.3% to 12.0%. Maturity dates range from payment on demand to June 2020. Included in the Company’s accounts receivable is approximately $1.7 million at December 31, 2004, due from affiliates related to construction receivables (none at December 31, 2003).

      Advances to, and investments in, joint ventures include the following items, which represent the difference between the Company’s investment and its proportionate share of the joint ventures’ underlying net assets (in millions):

                 
For the Year Ended
December 31,

2004 2003


Basis differentials *
  $ 51.4     $ 55.9  
Deferred development fees, net of portion relating to the Company’s interest
    (2.1 )     (2.6 )
Basis differential upon transfer of assets *
    (62.4 )     (51.4 )
Notes receivable from investments
    22.4       22.1  


Basis differentials occur primarily when the Company has purchased interests in existing joint ventures at fair market values, which differ from their proportionate share of the historical net assets of the joint ventures. In addition, certain acquisition, transaction and other costs, including capitalized interest, may not be reflected in the net assets at the joint venture level. Basis differentials upon transfer of assets is primarily associated with assets previously owned by the Company which have been transferred into a joint venture at fair value. This amount represents the aggregate difference between the Company’s historical cost basis and the basis reflected at the joint venture level. Certain basis differentials indicated above are amortized over the life of the related asset. Differences in income also occur when the Company acquires assets from joint ventures. The Company’s proportionate share of gains recorded at the joint venture level associated with assets acquired by the Company which approximated $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, were eliminated by the Company when recording its share of the joint venture income. The difference between the Company’s share of net income, as reported above, and the amounts included in the consolidated statements of operations is attributable to the amortization of such basis differentials, deferred gains and differences in gain (loss) on sale of certain assets due to the basis differentials.

F-18


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

     Service fees earned by the Company through management, leasing, development and financing activities performed related to the Company’s joint ventures are as follows (in millions):

                         
For the Year Ended
December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Management fees
  $ 11.4     $ 8.3     $ 7.3  
Acquisition, financing and guarantee fees
    3.0       0.9       0.3  
Development fees and leasing commissions
    3.8       2.4       3.3  
Interest income
    1.9       2.9       3.7  
Disposition fees
    0.2       0.4       0.6  
Sponsor fees *
          2.9        
Structuring fees
          2.6        


earned by an equity affiliate.

     Included in the joint venture net income in 2003 is a gain associated with the early extinguishment of debt of approximately $4.2 million of which the Company’s proportionate share approximated $3.4 million.

     Formation of Joint Ventures

          Acquisitions

Macquarie DDR Trust

      In November 2003, the Company closed a transaction pursuant to which the Company formed an Australian based Listed Property Trust, Macquarie DDR Trust (“MDT”), with Macquarie Bank Limited (ASX: MBL), an international investment bank, advisor and manager of specialized real estate funds in Australia (“MDT Joint Venture”). MDT focuses on acquiring ownership interests in institutional-quality community center properties in the United States.

      At December 31, 2004, MDT, which listed on the Australian Stock Exchange in November 2003, owns an approximate 83% interest in the portfolio. DDR retained an effective 14.5% ownership interest in the assets and MBL primarily owning the remaining 2.5%. DDR remains responsible for all day-to-day operations of the properties and will receive fees at prevailing rates for property management, leasing, construction management, acquisitions, due diligence, dispositions (including outparcel sales), and financing. Through their joint venture, DDR and MBL will also receive base asset management fees and incentive fees based on the performance of MDT. DDR recorded fees aggregating $3.0 million and $6.7 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively, in connection with the acquisition, structuring, formation and operation of the MDT Joint Venture.

      MDT has a two-year right of first offer, which expires in November 2005, on 20 pre-determined joint venture and wholly-owned assets currently in DDR’s portfolio. This right of first offer only applies if DDR determines that it will pursue the sale of these assets. MDT also is expected to pursue acquisitions of additional stabilized, institutional-quality community center properties.

      In May 2004, the MDT Joint Venture acquired an indirect ownership interest in 23 retail properties, which consists of over 4.0 million square feet of Company-owned GLA. The aggregate purchase price of the properties was approximately $538.0 million. Eight of the properties acquired by the MDT Joint Venture were owned by the Company and one of the properties was held by the Company through a joint venture. Fourteen of the properties acquired by the MDT Joint Venture were owned by Benderson. In December 2004, the Company contributed three operating properties to the MDT Joint Venture for approximately $96.6 million. The Company recognized a

F-19


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

gain of approximately $65.4 million relating to the sale of the effective 85.5% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $11.1 million relating to the Company’s effective 14.5% interest.

Coventry II

      In 2003, the Company entered into joint ventures (“Coventry II Joint Venture”) with Coventry Real Estate Fund II (the “Coventry II Fund”). The Coventry II Fund was formed with several institutional investors and Coventry Real Estate Advisors (“CREA”) as the investment manager. Neither the Company nor any of its officers, own a common interest in the Fund or have any incentive compensation tied to this Fund. The Coventry II Fund and DDR have agreed to jointly acquire value-added retail properties in the United States. CREA obtained $330 million of equity commitments to co-invest exclusively in joint ventures with DDR. The Coventry II Fund’s strategy is to invest in a variety of retail properties that present opportunities for value creation, such as re-tenanting, market repositioning, redevelopment or expansion.

      DDR expects, but is not obligated, to co-invest 20% in each joint venture and will be responsible for day-to-day management of the properties. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture, DDR will earn fees for property management, leasing and construction management. DDR also will earn a promoted interest, along with CREA, above a 10% preferred return after return of capital to fund investors. The assets of the Coventry II Joint Venture at December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                           
Acquisition
Effective GLA Price
Location Interest (Thousands) (Millions)




2004:
                       
 
Buena Park, California
    20 %      738     $ 91.5  
 
San Antonio, Texas
    10 %     Under Development(1)       8.1 (2)
 
Seattle, Washington
    20 %      291       37.0  
 
Phoenix, Arizona
    20 %     1,134       45.6  
2003:
                       
 
Kansas City, Missouri
    20 %      712       48.4  


(1)  Expected to be completed in Fall 2005. A third party developer owns 50% of this investment.
 
(2)  Net of $2.5 million sale to Target.

     Prudential Real Estate Investors

      In October 2004, the Company completed a $128 million joint venture transaction (“DPG Joint Venture”) with Prudential Real Estate Investors (“PREI”). The Company contributed 12 neighborhood grocery-anchored retail properties to the joint venture, eight of which were acquired by the Company from Benderson and four of which were acquired from JDN. The joint venture assumed approximately $12 million of secured, non-recourse financing associated with two properties. The Company maintains a 10% ownership in the joint venture and continues day-to-day management of the assets. The Company earns fees for property management, leasing and development. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $4.2 million relating to the sale of the 90% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $0.5 million relating to the Company’s 10% interest.

     Kuwait Financial Centre Joint Venture

      In November 2004, the Company completed a $204 million joint venture transaction (“DDR Markaz II”) with an investor group led by Kuwait Financial Centre-Markaz (a Kuwaiti publicly traded company). The Company contributed 13 neighborhood grocery-anchored retail properties to the joint venture, nine of which were acquired by the Company from Benderson and three of which were acquired from JDN and one of which was

F-20


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

owned by the Company. DDR Markaz II obtained approximately $150 million of seven-year secured non-recourse financing at a fixed rate of approximately 5.1%. The Company maintains a 20% equity ownership in the properties and continues day-to-day management of the assets. The Company earns fees at prevailing rates for property management, out-parcel sales, leasing and construction management. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $2.5 million relating to the sale of the 80% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $0.7 million relating to the Company’s 20% interest.

      In May 2003, the Company completed a $156 million joint venture transaction (“DDR Markaz I”) with an investor group led by Kuwait Financial Centre-Markaz. The Company contributed seven retail properties to the joint venture. In connection with this formation, DDR Markaz I LLC secured $110 million, non-recourse, five-year, secured financing at a fixed interest rate of approximately 4.13%. The Company retained a 20% ownership interest in these seven properties. The Company recognized a gain of approximately $25.8 million relating to the sale of the 80% interest in these properties and deferred a gain of approximately $6.5 million relating to the Company’s 20% interest. The Company earns fees at prevailing rates for asset management, property management, leasing, out-parcel sales and construction management.

Additional Joint Venture Interests

     Retail Value Fund

      In February 1998, the Company and an equity affiliate of the Company entered into an agreement with Prudential Real Estate Investors (“PREI”) and formed the Retail Value Fund (the “PREI Fund”). The PREI Fund’s ownership interests in each of the projects, unless discussed otherwise, are generally structured with the Company owning (directly or through its interest in the management service company) a 24.75% limited partnership interest, PREI owning a 74.25% limited partnership interest and Coventry Real Estate Partners (“Coventry”), which was 79% owned by a consolidated entity of the Company at December 31, 2004, owning (directly or through its interest in the management service company) a 1% general partnership interest. The PREI Fund invests in retail properties within the United States that are in need of substantial re-tenanting and market repositioning and may also make equity and debt investments in companies owning or managing retail properties as well as in third party development projects that provide significant growth opportunities. The retail property investments may include enclosed malls, neighborhood and community centers or other potential retail commercial development and redevelopment opportunities.

      The PREI Fund owns the following investments at December 31, 2004:

                 
Number of GLA
Location Properties (Thousands)



Kansas City, Missouri & Kansas City, Kansas
    5       484  
Long Beach, California (1)
    1       283  
Deer Park, Illinois (2)
    1       282  
Austin, Texas (3)
    1       266  


(1)  In September 2004, the PREI Fund sold a portion of this center for approximately $16.6 million. The joint venture recorded an aggregate Merchant build gain of $4.6 million of which the Company’s proportionate share, net of costs, is approximately $0.6 million.
 
(2)  In January 2004, the PREI Fund purchased the remaining 50% interest from its development partner for approximately $5.4 million.
 
(3)  In July 2004, the PREI Fund purchased the remaining 50% interest from its development partner for approximately $4.9 million. This center was completed in 2004.

     In addition, in 2000, the PREI Fund entered into an agreement to acquire ten properties, located in western states from Burnham Pacific Properties, Inc. (“Burnham”) with PREI owning a 79% interest, the Company

F-21


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

owning a 20% interest and Coventry owning a 1% interest at an aggregate purchase price of $280 million. Three of these properties were sold in 2003 at an aggregate price of $57.8 million and the joint venture recognized an aggregate gain of approximately $16.1 million, of which the Company’s proportionate share was $2.6 million. In 2004, the PREI Fund sold a significant portion of a shopping center in Puente Hills, California, which represented approximately 519,000 square feet of GLA, for approximately $66.2 million and recognized a gain of approximately $12.8 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was approximately $4.0 million. Also in 2004, the PREI Fund sold a shopping center in Mission Viejo, California aggregating 45,600 square feet for a sales price of approximately $18.0 million and recognized a gain of approximately $5.8 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was approximately $2.0 million. The Company earns fees for managing and leasing the properties.

      As discussed above, Coventry generally owns a 1% interest in each of the PREI Fund’s investments except for the PREI Fund’s investment associated with properties acquired from Burnham. Coventry is also entitled to receive an annual asset management fee equal to 0.5% of total assets. Coventry is also entitled to one-third of all profits (as defined), once the limited partners have received a 10% preferred return and previously advanced capital. The remaining two-thirds of the profits (as defined) in excess of the 10% preferred return is split proportionately among the limited partners.

      With regard to the PREI Fund’s investment associated with the acquisition of shopping centers from Burnham, Coventry has a 1% general partnership interest. Coventry also receives annual asset management fees equal to 0.8% of total revenue collected from these assets plus a minimum of 25% of all amounts in excess of a 10% annual preferred return to the limited partners that could increase to 35% if returns to the limited partners exceed 20%.

 
Management Service Companies

      The Company owns a 50% equity ownership interest in a management and development company in St. Louis, Missouri.

 
KLA/ SM Joint Venture

      In March 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture with Lubert-Adler Funds and Klaff Realty, L.P. (Note 15), which was awarded asset designation rights for all of the retail real estate interests of the bankrupt estate of Service Merchandise Corporation for approximately $242 million. The Company has an approximate 25% interest in the joint venture. In addition, the Company earns fees for the management, leasing, development and disposition of the real estate portfolio. The designation rights enabled the joint venture to determine the ultimate disposition of the real estate interests held by the bankrupt estate. At December 31, 2004, the portfolio consisted of approximately 63 Service Merchandise retail sites totaling approximately 3.4 million square feet. At December 31, 2004, these sites were 69.6% leased.

      In 2004, the joint venture sold 11 sites and received gross proceeds of approximately $20.7 million and recorded an aggregate gain of $2.0 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was approximately $0.5 million. In 2003, the joint venture sold 22 sites and received gross proceeds of approximately $55.0 million and recorded an aggregate gain of $5.1 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was approximately $1.3 million. In 2002, the joint venture sold 45 sites and received gross proceeds of approximately $106.5 million and recorded an aggregate gain of $4.4 million of which the Company’s proportionate share was approximately $1.1 million. The Company also earned disposition, development, management, leasing fees and interest income aggregating $2.6 million, $2.7 million and $2.5 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, relating to this investment.

F-22


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

 
Adoption of FIN 46 (Note 1)

      Pursuant to the adoption of FIN 46, the following entities were identified as variable interest entities and consolidated into the consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations of the Company at January 1, 2004. These five properties had aggregate assets, advances to DDR, mortgage debt and other liabilities of approximately $30.5 million, $9.7 million, $20.0 million and $0.2 million, respectively, at December 31, 2003. These joint ventures are identified as follows:

  •  Four joint venture interests which own developable land located in Round Rock, Texas; Opelika, Alabama; Jackson, Mississippi and Monroe, Louisiana. The Company owns a 50%, 11%, 50% and 50% interest in these joint ventures, respectively;
 
  •  A 50% interest in an operating shopping center property located in Martinsville, Virginia.

      The Company recorded a charge of $3.0 million as a cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard attributable to the consolidation of the shopping center in Martinsville, Virginia. This amount represents the minority partner’s share of cumulative losses in excess of its cost basis in the partnership.

     Sale of Joint Venture Assets to DDR

      The Company purchased its joint venture partner’s interest in the following shopping centers:

  •  A 20% interest in a shopping center located in Independence, Missouri purchased in 2002;
 
  •  A 75.25% interest through the PREI Fund in two shopping centers located in Plainville, Connecticut and San Antonio, Texas purchased in 2002;
 
  •  A 51% interest in a shopping center acquired through the merger of JDN located in Suwanee, Georgia purchased in 2003;
 
  •  A 50% interest in a shopping center located in Canton, Ohio purchased in 2002;
 
  •  A 50% interest in a shopping center located in Leawood, Kansas purchased in 2003;
 
  •  A 50% interest in a shopping center located in Littleton, Colorado purchased in 2004; and
 
  •  The MDT Joint Venture acquired the interest in one and seven shopping centers owned through other joint venture interests in 2004 and 2003, respectively, and accordingly these properties are not presented in discontinued operations since the Company has continuing involvement.

 
Additional Shopping Center Joint Ventures not addressed above — As of December 31, 2004

  •  An 80% equity ownership interest in two joint ventures each owning an operating shopping property in Columbus, Ohio;
 
  •  A 67% equity ownership interest in a joint venture, which owns an operating shopping center in Phoenix, Arizona;
 
  •  A 50% equity ownership interest in 9 different joint ventures, which, in the aggregate, own 11 operating shopping centers and developable land;
 
  •  A 25% equity ownership interest in a joint venture, which owns an operating shopping center property in Pasadena, California and
 
  •  A 10% equity ownership interest in a joint venture, which owns an operating shopping center in Kildeer, Illinois.

F-23


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      In January 2004, a joint venture in which the Company owned a 35% interest, sold a 320,000 square foot shopping center property located in San Antonio, Texas for approximately $59.1 million and recognized a gain of $19.1 million, of which the Company’s proportionate share was approximately $6.7 million.

      The Company’s joint venture agreements generally include provisions whereby each partner has the right to trigger a purchase or sale of its interest in the joint ventures (Reciprocal Purchase Rights) or to initiate a purchase or sale of the properties (Property Purchase Rights) after a certain number of years or if either party is in default of the joint venture agreements. Under these provisions, the Company is not obligated to purchase the interest of its outside joint venture partners.

      In addition, one of the joint venture agreements includes a provision whereby the Company’s joint venture partners may convert all, or a portion of, their respective interest in such joint venture into common shares of the Company. The terms of the conversion are set forth in the governing documents. However, if the joint venture partners elect to convert their respective interest into common shares, the Company will have the option to pay cash instead of issuing common shares. If the Company agrees to the issuance of common shares, the agreement provides that the converting joint venture partner will execute a lock-up arrangement acceptable to the Company.

 
Discontinued Operations

      Included in discontinued operations in the combined statements of operations for the joint ventures are the following properties sold subsequent to December 31, 2001:

  •  A 20% interest in five properties held in the PREI Fund originally acquired from Burnham. The shopping centers in City of Industry, California and Mission Viejo, California were sold in 2004. The shopping centers located in Sacramento, California; Fullerton, California and Bellingham, Washington were sold in 2003;
 
  •  A 20% interest in three properties held in the Community Center Joint Ventures. The shopping centers in Durham, North Carolina and Denver, Colorado were sold in 2002. The shopping center located in San Diego, California was sold in 2003;
 
  •  A 24.75% interest in four properties held through the PREI Fund. Shopping center properties located in Hagerstown, Maryland; Salem, New Hampshire and Round Rock, Texas were sold in 2002. A shopping center located in Kansas City, Kansas was sold in 2003;
 
  •  An approximate 25% interest in several Service Merchandise sites;
 
  •  A 35% interest in a shopping center located in San Antonio, Texas was sold in 2004;
 
  •  A 50% interest in a shopping center located in St. Louis, Missouri was sold in 2003 and
 
  •  An 83.75% interest in three former Best Product sites (one of which was disposed of in 2004 (which was consolidated into the Company at December 31, 2003), two of which were disposed of in 2003 and one of which was disposed of in 2002).

3. Acquisitions and Pro Forma Financial Information

      During the first quarter of 2003, the Company’s and JDN’s shareholders approved a definitive merger agreement pursuant to which JDN shareholders received 0.518 common shares of DDR in exchange for each share of JDN common stock on March 13, 2003. The Company issued 18.0 million common shares valued at $21.22 per share based upon the average of the closing prices of DDR common shares between October 2, 2002 and October 8, 2002, the period immediately prior to and subsequent to the announcement of the merger. The transaction initially valued JDN at approximately $1.1 billion, which included approximately $606.2 million of assumed debt at fair market value and $50 million of voting preferred shares. In the opinion of management, the $50 million of preferred shares represented fair value; as these shares were subsequently redeemed in September

F-24


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

2003 (Note 12). Through this merger, DDR acquired 102 retail assets aggregating 23 million square feet including 16 development properties comprising approximately six million square feet of total GLA. Additionally, DDR acquired a development pipeline of several properties. DDR engaged an appraiser to perform valuations of the real estate and certain other assets. Included in the assets acquired are the land, building and tenant improvements associated with the underlying real estate. The other assets allocation relates primarily to the value associated with in-place leases and tenant relationships of the properties (Note 6). The Company determined the in-place leases acquired approximated fair market value; therefore there was no separate allocation in the purchase price for above-market or below-market leases. The Company entered into the merger to acquire a large portfolio of assets. The revenues and expenses relating to the JDN properties are included in DDR’s historical results of operations from the date of the merger, March 13, 2003.

      A condensed balance sheet of the assets acquired with the merger with JDN as of the acquisition date of March 13, 2003 is as follows (in thousands):

             
Assets
       
 
Real estate assets
  $ 1,030,625  
 
Cash and cash equivalents
    9,928  
 
Investments in and advances to joint ventures
    6,750  
 
Other assets
    4,155  
     
 
    $ 1,051,458  
     
 
Liabilities
       
 
Fixed rate notes
  $ 235,000  
 
Revolving credit facility
    229,000  
 
Mortgages and construction loans
    111,852  
     
 
   
Total indebtedness
    575,852  
 
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    42,156  
 
Operating partnership minority interest
    1,524  
     
 
      619,532  
Shareholder equity
       
 
Preferred voting shares
    50,000  
 
Common shares and paid in capital
    381,926  
     
 
      431,926  
     
 
    $ 1,051,458  
     
 

      In March 2004, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase interests in 110 retail real estate assets with approximately 18.8 million square feet of GLA from Benderson. The purchase price of the assets, including associated expenses, was approximately $2.3 billion, less assumed debt and the value of a 2% equity interest in certain assets valued at approximately $16.2 million that Benderson retains as set forth below. Benderson transferred a 100% ownership in certain assets or entities owning certain assets. The remaining assets are held by a joint venture in which the Company holds a 98.0% interest and Benderson holds a 2.0% interest, which are classified as operating partnership minority interests on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

      The Company completed the purchase of 107 properties, including 14 purchased directly by the MDT Joint Venture (Note 2) and 52 held by a consolidated joint venture with Benderson at various dates commencing May 14, 2004 through December 21, 2004. The remaining three properties will not be acquired.

F-25


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      With respect to the consolidated joint venture, Benderson will have the right to cause the joint venture to redeem its 2.0% interest for a price equal to the agreed upon value of the interest after 20 months from May 2004, of approximately $16.2 million, adjusted to reflect changes in the price of the Company’s common shares during the period in which Benderson holds the 2.0% interest, less certain distributions Benderson receives from the joint venture. If Benderson exercises the foregoing right, the Company will have the right to satisfy the joint venture’s obligation by purchasing Benderson’s interest for cash or by issuing DDR common shares. If Benderson does not elect to exercise its right to have its interest redeemed, the Company will have the right after 30 months to purchase that 2.0% interest for cash or common shares for a price determined in the same manner as if Benderson had elected to cause such redemption. At December 31, 2004, the book value of this interest is $14.2 million as certain of these assets were sold to a joint venture with PREI.

      The Company funded the transaction through a combination of new debt financing of approximately $450 million, net proceeds of approximately $164.2 million from the issuance of 6.8 million cumulative preferred shares, net proceeds of approximately $491 million from the issuance of 15.0 million common shares, asset transfers to the MDT Joint Venture which generated net proceeds of approximately $194.3 million (Note 2) line of credit borrowings and assumed debt. With respect to the assumed debt, the fair value was approximately $400 million, which included an adjustment of approximately $30 million to increase its stated principal balance, based on rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities as of May 2004. DDR engaged an appraiser to perform valuations of the real estate and certain other acquired tangible and intangible assets. Included in the assets acquired are the land, building and tenant improvements associated with the underlying real estate. The other assets allocation of $30.9 million relates primarily to in-place leases, leasing commissions, tenant relationships and tenant improvements of the properties (Note 6). There was a separate allocation in the purchase price of $4.7 million for certain below-market leases. The Company entered into this transaction to acquire the largest, privately owned retail shopping center portfolio in markets where the Company previously did not have a strong presence.

      Benderson has also entered into a five-year master lease for vacant space that was either covered by a letter of intent as of the closing date or a new lease with respect to which the tenant had not begun to pay rent as of the closing date. During the five-year master lease, Benderson agreed to pay the rent for such vacant space, until each applicable tenant’s rent commencement date. The Company recorded the master lease receivable as part of the purchase price allocation. At December 31, 2004, the master lease receivable was $3.2 million.

      The following unaudited supplemental pro forma operating data is presented for the year ended December 31, 2004 as if the acquisition of the properties from Benderson and related financing activity, including the sale of eight wholly-owned assets to the MDT Joint Venture were completed on January 1, 2004. The following unaudited supplemental pro forma operating data is presented for the year ended December 31, 2003 as if the merger with JDN, the acquisition of the eight properties or partnership interests mentioned above, the acquisition for the properties from Benderson and related financing activity, including the sale of eight wholly-owned assets to the MDT Joint Venture were completed on January 1, 2003. Pro forma operating data presented for the year ended December 31, 2002 is presented as if the acquisition of the 19 properties or partnership interests acquired in 2002 and 2003, the merger with JDN, the common share offerings completed in February 2002 and the preferred share offering completed in March 2002 had occurred on January 1, 2002. Pro forma amounts include transaction costs, general and administrative expenses, losses on investments and settlement costs JDN reported in its historical results of approximately $19.3 million and $8.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which management believes to be non-recurring.

      These acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The revenues and expenses related to assets and interests acquired are included in the Company’s historical results of operations from the date of purchase.

F-26


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of what actual results of operations would have been had the acquisitions occurred as indicated nor does it purport to represent the results of the operations for future periods (in thousands, except per share data):

                           
For the year ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



(Unaudited)
Pro forma revenues
  $ 658,805     $ 647,678     $ 501,398  
     
     
     
 
Pro forma income from continuing operations
  $ 190,665     $ 182,432     $ 127,926  
     
     
     
 
Pro forma income from discontinued operations
  $ 10,295     $ 686     $ 2,498  
     
     
     
 
Pro forma income before cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
  $ 285,602     $ 267,025     $ 133,853  
     
     
     
 
Pro forma net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 227,397     $ 202,125     $ 97,659  
     
     
     
 
Per share data:
                       
Basic earnings per share data:
                       
 
Income from continuing operations applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.16     $ 2.01     $ 1.12  
 
Income from discontinued operations
    0.11       0.01       0.04  
 
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (0.03 )            
     
     
     
 
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.24     $ 2.02     $ 1.16  
     
     
     
 
Diluted earning per share data:
                       
 
Income from continuing operations applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.13     $ 1.98     $ 1.11  
 
Income from discontinued operations
    0.10       0.01       0.04  
 
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (0.03 )            
     
     
     
 
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.20     $ 1.99     $ 1.15  
     
     
     
 

      These pro formas do not include the acquisitions described below or the disposition of real estate assets other than those described above.

      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company acquired a 20% interest in two shopping centers and an effective 10% interest in a shopping center. Additionally, the Company acquired its partner’s 50% interest in a joint venture. These four properties aggregate approximately 2.4 million square feet of Company-owned GLA at an initial aggregate investment of approximately $180 million.

      During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company also acquired two shopping centers, a 67% interest in a shopping center, a 25% interest in a shopping center and a 20% interest in a shopping center. Additionally, the Company acquired its partner’s 50% interest in a joint venture and another partner’s 51% interest in a joint venture. These eight properties aggregate approximately 3.3 million square feet of Company-owned GLA at an initial aggregate investment of approximately $223.0 million.

 
4.  Notes Receivable

      The Company owns notes receivables aggregating $17.8 million and $11.7 million, including accrued interest, at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which are classified as held to maturity. The notes are secured by certain rights in future development projects and partnership interests. The notes bear interest ranging from 6.9% to 12.0% with maturity dates ranging from payment on demand through April 2021.

F-27


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      Included in notes receivable are $15.8 million and $7.3 million of tax incremental financing bonds (“TIF Bonds”), plus accrued interest at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, from the Town of Plainville, Connecticut (the “Plainville Bonds”) and the City of Merriam (the “Merriam Bonds”). The Plainville Bonds, with total receivables of $7.2 million and $7.3 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003 mature in April 2021 and bear interest at 7.125%. As of December 31, 2004, the Merriam Bonds have associated notes receivable of $8.6 million. These bonds mature in February 2016 and bear interest at 6.9%. Interest and principal are payable from the incremental real estate taxes generated by the shopping center and development project pursuant to the terms of the financing agreement.

 
5. Deferred Charges

      Deferred charges consist of the following (in thousands):

                 
December 31,

2004 2003


Deferred financing costs
  $ 24,874     $ 20,604  
Less — accumulated amortization
    (10,715 )     (8,312 )
     
     
 
    $ 14,159     $ 12,292  
     
     
 

      The Company incurred deferred finance costs aggregating $6.9 million and $6.4 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Deferred finance costs paid in 2004 and 2003 primarily relate to the Company’s unsecured revolving credit agreements, term loan (Note 7) and issuance of medium term notes (Note 8). Additionally in 2003, the Company paid deferred finance costs for a secured financing of a group of shopping center properties. Amortization of deferred charges was $5.6 million and $6.5 million for the years ended December 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 
6. Other Assets

      Other assets consist of the following (in thousands):

                     
December 31,

2004 2003


Intangible assets:
               
 
In-place leases (including lease origination costs), net
  $ 10,127     $ 5,919  
 
Tenant relations, net
    12,689       5,550  
     
     
 
   
Total intangible assets
    22,816       11,469  
Other assets:
               
 
Fair value hedge
    2,263       5,573  
 
Prepaids, deposits and other assets
    68,559       25,693  
     
     
 
   
Total other assets
  $ 93,638     $ 42,735  
     
     
 

      The intangible assets relate primarily to acquisitions in connection with the JDN merger and acquisition of assets from Benderson (Note 3). The amortization period of the in-place leases and tenant relations is approximately two to 14 years and 31.5 years, respectively. The Company recorded amortization expense of approximately $4.0 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Other assets consist primarily of deposits (including a $30 million deposit associated with the Company’s 2005 acquisition of 15 shopping center assets in Puerto Rico at December 31, 2004), land options and other prepaid expenses.

F-28


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

 
7. Revolving Credit Facilities and Term Loans

      The Company maintains an unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions for which JP Morgan serves as the administrative agent (the “Unsecured Credit Facility”). In 2004, the Company increased the size of the facility to $1.0 billion. This facility matures in May 2006. The Unsecured Credit Facility includes a competitive bid option for up to 50% of the facility amount that allows banks that participate in the facility to bid to make loan advances to the Company at a reduced Eurodollar rate. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at variable rates based on the prime rate or LIBOR plus a specified spread (0.8% at December 31, 2004). The spread is dependent on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt rating from Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service. The Company is required to comply with certain covenants relating to total outstanding indebtedness, secured indebtedness, net worth, maintenance of unencumbered real estate assets, debt service coverage and fixed charge coverage. The facility also provides for a facility fee of 0.2% on the entire facility. The Unsecured Credit Facility is used to finance the acquisition and development of real estate, to provide working capital and for general corporate purposes. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, total borrowings under this facility aggregated $60.0 million and $171.0 million, respectively, with a weighted average interest rate of 3.0% and 1.9%, respectively.

      The Company also maintains a $30 million secured revolving credit facility and a $25 million development construction facility with National City Bank (together with the $1.0 billion Unsecured Credit Facility, the “Revolving Credit Facilities”). The $30 million revolving credit facility matures in June 2006 and the $25 million development construction facility matures June 2005. The $30 million revolving credit facility is collateralized by certain partnership investments and the $25 million development construction facility is collateralized by the applicable development project(s). The Company maintains the right to reduce the $30 million revolving credit facility to $20 million and to convert the borrowings to an unsecured revolving credit facility. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest at variable rates based on the prime rate or LIBOR plus a specified spread (0.8% at December 31, 2004). The spread is dependent on the Company’s long term senior unsecured debt rating from Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service. The Company is required to comply with certain covenants relating to total outstanding indebtedness, secured indebtedness, net worth, maintenance of unencumbered real estate assets, debt service coverage and fixed charge coverage. The $30 million revolving credit facility also provides for commitment fees of 0.15% on the unused credit amount. At December 31, 2004, there were no borrowings outstanding. At December 31, 2003, total borrowings under these facilities aggregated $35.5 million, with a weighted average interest rate of 2.4%.

      In March 2003, in conjunction with the merger with JDN, the Company obtained a $300 million unsecured bridge facility for which Bank of America and Wells Fargo Bank serve as agents (“Term Loan”). The proceeds from this facility were used to repay JDN’s revolving credit facility with an outstanding principal balance of $229 million at the time of the merger and JDN’s $85 million MOPPRS debt and related call option which matured on March 31, 2003. This facility bears interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus a specified spread (1.0% at December 31, 2004) depending on the Company’s long-term senior unsecured debt rating from Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service. This facility is subject to the same covenants associated with the Unsecured Credit Facility discussed above. The unsecured term loan has a maturity date of March 2005. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, $150 million and $300 million, respectively was outstanding under this facility with an interest rate of 3.4% and 2.1%, respectively. In May 2004, in connection with the financing related to the acquisition of assets from Benderson, the Company entered into a $200 million unsecured term loan with JP Morgan and several other lenders (together with the $300 million Term Loan, the “Term Loans”). This facility has a maturity date of May 2006 with two one-year extension options and bears interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus a specified spread (0.75% at December 31, 2004). The spread is dependent on the Company’s long term senior unsecured debt rating from Standard and Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service. This facility is subject to the same covenants associated with the Unsecured Credit Facility discussed above. At December 31, 2004, $200 million was outstanding under this facility with an interest rate of 3.2%.

F-29


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      Total fees paid by the Company on its Revolving Credit Facilities and Term Loans in 2004, 2003 and 2002, aggregated approximately $1.7 million, $1.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial and other covenant requirements.

 
8.  Fixed Rate Notes

      The Company had outstanding unsecured notes of $1.2 billion and $839.0 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Five of the notes were issued at a discount aggregating $5.1 million and $4.6 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The effective interest rates of these notes range from 6.2% to 8.6% per annum.

      In April 2004, the Company issued $250 million, 5.25% seven-year unsecured notes through a private placement. These notes are due April 15, 2011 and were offered at a discount of 99.574%.

      In January 2004, the Company issued $275 million of five-year unsecured senior notes with a coupon rate of 3.875%. These notes are due January 30, 2009 and were offered at a discount of 99.584%.

      The above fixed rate notes have maturities ranging from November 2005 to July 2018. Interest rates ranged from approximately 3.875% to 7.5% (averaging 5.3% and 6.0% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively). The notes issued prior to December 31, 2001 may not be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity and will not be subject to any sinking fund requirements. The notes issued subsequent to 2001 and the notes assumed with the JDN merger, aggregating $920 million, may be redeemed based upon a yield maintenance calculation. The fixed rate senior notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated May 1, 1994, as amended, which contains certain covenants including limitation on incurrence of debt, maintenance of unencumbered real estate assets and debt service coverage. Interest is paid semi-annually in arrears.

 
9.  Mortgages Payable and Scheduled Principal Repayments

      At December 31, 2004, mortgages payable, collateralized by investments and real estate with a net book value of approximately $2.1 billion and related tenant leases, are generally due in monthly installments of principal and/or interest and mature at various dates through 2025. Fixed rate debt obligations included in mortgages payable at December 31, 2004 and 2003, totaled approximately $959.3 million and $603.1 million, respectively. Fixed interest rates ranged from approximately 4.4% to 9.75% (averaging 6.8% and 6.5% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively). Variable rate debt obligations totaled approximately $129.3 million and $154.5 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Interest rates on the variable rate debt averaged 3.7% and 2.6% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      Included in mortgage debt is $15.8 million and $7.3 million of tax exempt certificates with a weighted average fixed interest rate of 7.0% and 7.1% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. As of December 31, 2004, the scheduled principal payments of the Revolving Credit Facilities, Term Loans, fixed rate senior notes and mortgages payable (excluding the effect of the fair value hedge which was $2.3 million at December 31, 2004) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

         
Year Amount


2005
  $ 241,173  
2006
    338,814  
2007
    287,326  
2008
    289,927  
2009
    375,695  
Thereafter
    1,183,491  
     
 
    $ 2,716,426  
     
 

F-30


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      Included in principal payments are $150 million in the year 2005 and $260 million in the year 2006, associated with the maturing of the Term Loans and the Revolving Credit Facilities.

 
10.  Financial Instruments

      The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures of financial instruments:

 
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities

      The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for these financial instruments approximated fair value because of their short term maturities. The carrying amount of straight-line rents receivable does not materially differ from its fair market value.

 
Notes receivable and advances to affiliates

      The fair value is estimated by discounting the current rates at which management believes similar loans would be made. The fair value of these notes was approximately $45.8 million and $46.4 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, as compared to the carrying amounts of $44.4 million and $45.4 million, respectively. The carrying value of the TIF Bonds (Note 4) approximated its fair value at December 31, 2004 and 2003. The fair value of loans to affiliates are not readily determinable and have been estimated by management.

 
Debt

      The carrying amounts of the Company’s borrowings under its Revolving Credit Facilities and Term Loans approximate fair value because such borrowings are at variable rates and the spreads are typically adjusted to reflect changes in the Company’s credit rating. The fair value of the fixed rate senior notes is based on borrowings with a similar remaining maturity based on the Company’s estimated interest rate spread over the applicable treasury rate. Fair value of the mortgages payable is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements with the same remaining maturities.

      Considerable judgment is necessary to develop estimated fair values of financial instruments. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize on disposition of the financial instruments.

      Financial instruments at December 31, 2004 and 2003, with carrying values that are different than estimated fair values are summarized as follows (in thousands):

                                 
2004 2003


Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value




Senior notes
  $ 1,220,143     $ 1,235,684     $ 838,996     $ 871,236  
Term loans
    350,000       350,000       300,000       300,000  
Mortgages payable
    1,088,547       1,130,575       757,635       793,737  
     
     
     
     
 
    $ 2,658,690     $ 2,716,259     $ 1,896,631     $ 1,964,973  
     
     
     
     
 
 
Accounting Policy for Derivative and Hedging Activities

      All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. On the date that the Company enters into a derivative, it designates the derivative as a hedge against the variability of cash flows that are to be paid in

F-31


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

connection with a recognized liability or forecasted transaction. Subsequent changes in the fair value of a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge that is determined to be highly effective is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss), until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows of the hedged transaction. Any hedge ineffectiveness is reported in current earnings.

      From time to time, the Company enters into interest rate swaps to convert certain fixed-rate debt obligations to a floating rate (a “fair value hedge”). This is consistent with the Company’s overall interest rate risk management strategy to maintain an appropriate balance of fixed rate and variable rate borrowings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are highly effective and which are designated and qualify as a fair value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged liability that are attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in current-period earnings. If hedge accounting is discontinued due to the Company’s determination that the relationship no longer qualified as an effective fair value hedge, the Company will continue to carry the derivative on the balance sheet at its fair value but cease to adjust the hedged liability for changes in fair value.

      The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company formally assesses (both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. Should it be determined that a derivative is not (or has ceased to be) highly effective as a hedge, the Company will discontinue hedge accounting on a prospective basis.

 
Risk Management

      The Company purchased interest rate swaps to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate volatility or in the case of a fair value hedge to take advantage of expected lower variable rates. The Company does not typically utilize these arrangements for trading or speculative purposes. The principal risk to the Company through its interest rate hedging strategy is the potential inability of the financial institutions, from which the interest rate swaps were purchased, to cover all of their obligations. To mitigate this exposure, the Company purchases its interest rate swaps from major financial institutions.

 
Cash Flow and Fair Value Hedges

      In June 2003, the Company entered into a $30 million interest rate swap for a two-year term effectively converting floating rate debt of a secured construction loan into fixed rate debt with an effective interest rate of 2.8%. In January 2003, the Company entered into two interest rate swaps, $50 million for a 1.5-year term and $50 million for a two-year term, effectively converting floating rate debt under the Unsecured Credit Facility into fixed rate debt with an effective weighted average interest rate of 2.7%. In March 2002, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement, with a notional amount of $60 million for a five-year term, effectively converting a portion of the outstanding fixed rate debt under a fixed rate senior note to a variable rate of six month LIBOR.

      As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the aggregate fair value and recorded ineffectiveness of its derivatives was immaterial. The Company expects that within the next twelve months it will reflect as a benefit to earnings $0.2 million of the amount recorded in accumulated other comprehensive gain. The fair value of its derivatives is based upon the estimated amounts the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contract at the reporting date and is determined using interest rate market pricing models.

 
Joint Venture Derivative Instruments

      One of the Company’s joint ventures entered into a fixed rate interest swap, which carries a notional amount of $59.1 million, and converted variable rate debt to a fixed rate of 6.2%. As the joint venture has not elected

F-32


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

hedge accounting for this derivative, it is marked to market with the adjustments flowing through its income statement. In April 2004, the MDT Joint Venture entered into a $20 million interest rate swap for a five-year term effectively converting a portion of the variable rate mortgage debt to a fixed rate of 4.8%.

      In May 2003, one of the Company’s joint ventures entered into a $55 million interest rate swap for a four-year term effectively converting a portion of the variable rate mortgage debt to a fixed rate.

      At December 31, 2004 and 2003, certain of the Company’s joint ventures had interest rate swaps aggregating $75 million and $93 million, respectively, converting a portion of the variable rate mortgage debt to a weighted average fixed rate of approximately 5.5% and 5.6%, respectively. The aggregate fair value of these instruments at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was not material.

 
11. Commitments and Contingencies

     Leases

      The Company is engaged in the operation of shopping centers, which are either owned or, with respect to certain shopping centers, operated under long-term ground leases, which expire at various dates through 2070, with renewal options. Space in the shopping centers is leased to tenants pursuant to agreements which provide for terms ranging generally from one month to 30 years and, in some cases, for annual rentals which are subject to upward adjustments based on operating expense levels, sales volume, or contractual increases as defined in the lease agreements. The scheduled future minimum revenues from rental properties under the terms of all non-cancelable tenant leases, assuming no new or renegotiated leases or option extensions for such premises, for the subsequent five years ending December 31, are as follows for continuing operations (in thousands):

         
2005
  $ 449,881  
2006
    418,118  
2007
    382,737  
2008
    347,350  
2009
    308,329  
Thereafter
    1,757,637  
     
 
    $ 3,664,052  
     
 

      Scheduled minimum rental payments under the terms of all non-cancelable operating leases in which the Company is the lessee, principally for office space and ground leases, for the subsequent five years ending December 31, are as follows (in thousands):

         
2005
  $ 4,463  
2006
    4,074  
2007
    3,907  
2008
    3,893  
2009
    3,719  
Thereafter
    182,299  
     
 
    $ 202,355  
     
 

      There were no material capital leases in which the Company was the lessee or lessor at December 31, 2004 or 2003.

F-33


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

     Commitments and Guarantees

      In conjunction with the development and expansion of various shopping centers, the Company has entered into agreements with general contractors for the construction of the shopping centers aggregating approximately $84.6 million as of December 31, 2004.

      As discussed in Note 2, the Company and certain equity affiliates entered into several joint ventures with various third party developers. In conjunction with certain joint venture agreements, the Company and/or its equity affiliate has agreed to fund the required capital associated with approved development projects, comprised principally of outstanding construction contracts, aggregating approximately $18.7 million as of December 31, 2004. The Company and/or its equity affiliate is entitled to receive a priority return on capital advances at rates ranging from 10.5% to 12.0%.

      In November 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with DRA Advisors, its partner in the Community Centers contributed to the MDT Joint Venture, to pay a $0.8 million annual consulting fee for 10 years for ongoing services rendered relating to the assessment of financing and strategic investment alternatives.

      In connection with the sale of one of the properties to the MDT Joint Venture, the Company deferred the recognition of approximately $3.6 million and $3.7 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, of the gain on sale of real estate related to a shortfall agreement guarantee maintained by the Company. The MDT Joint Venture is obligated to fund any shortfall amount that is caused by the failure of the landlord or tenant to pay taxes when due and payable on the shopping center. The Company is obligated to pay any shortfall to the extent that it is not caused by the failure of the landlord or tenant to pay taxes when due and payable on the shopping center. No shortfall payments have been made on this property since the completion of construction in 1997.

      The Company entered into master lease agreements with the MDT Joint Venture in 2003 and 2004 with the transfer of properties to the joint venture which has been recorded as a liability and reduction of its gain. The Company is responsible for the monthly base rent, all operating and maintenance expenses and certain tenant improvements and leasing commissions for units not yet leased at closing for a three-year period. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s obligation, included in accounts payable and other expenses, totaled approximately $7.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively.

      In connection with the KLA/ SM joint venture, the Company agreed to guarantee the payment of rents for various affiliates of the KLA/ SM joint venture in the aggregate amount of $3.3 million over a three-year period, which commenced August 2002. The Company has not recorded a liability for the guarantee as the subtenants of the KLA/ SM affiliates are paying rent as due. The Company has recourse against the other parties in the partnership in the event of default. No assets of the Company are currently held as collateral to pay this guarantee.

      Related to its investment in a joint venture in which the Company has a 50% equity investment, the Company has issued a letter of credit in the amount of $1.6 million to guarantee the payment of rent by a specific tenant pursuant to a debt financing requirement. This letter of credit commenced in March 2000, and matures in March 2005. The Company does not have a liability recorded as of December 31, 2004 related to this guarantee as the tenant is paying rent as due. The Company has recourse against the other party in the partnership in the event of default. No assets of the Company are currently held as collateral to pay this guarantee.

      In the event of any loss or the reduction in the historic tax credit allocated or to be allocated to a joint venture partner in connection with a historic commercial parcel acquired in 2002, the Company guaranteed payment in the maximum amount of $0.7 million to the other joint venture partner. The Company has a liability recorded as of December 31, 2004 related to this guarantee. The Company does not have recourse against any other party in the event of default. No assets of the Company are currently held as collateral to pay this guarantee.

      The Company entered into master lease agreements with the DDR Markaz II joint venture in October 2004 in connection with the transfer of properties to the joint venture at closing. The Company is responsible for the

F-34


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

monthly base rent, all operating and maintenance expenses and certain tenant improvements and leasing commissions for units not yet leased at closing for a three-year period. At December 31, 2004, the Company’s master lease obligation, included in accounts payable and other expenses, totaled $4.4 million.

      Related to one of the Company’s developments in Long Beach, California, the Company guaranteed the payment of any special taxes levied on the property within the City of Long Beach Community Facilities District No. 6 and attributable to the payment of debt service on the bonds for periods prior to the completion of certain improvements related to this project. In addition, an affiliate of the Company has agreed to make an annual payment of approximately $0.6 million to defray a portion of the operating expenses of the parking garage through the earlier of October 2032 or until the City’s parking garage bonds are repaid. There are no assets held as collateral or liabilities recorded related to these obligations.

      The Company continuously monitors its obligations and commitments. There have been no other material items entered into by the Company since December 31, 2003 through December 31, 2004 other than as described above.

     Legal Matters

      In January 2004, the appellate court denied the Company’s appeal of a judgment in the amount of $8.0 million, plus interest and attorneys’ fees, against the Company and two other defendants, in connection with a verdict reached in a civil trial involving a claim filed by Regal Cinemas relating to a property owned by the Company. After consultation with legal counsel, the Company determined that it would not appeal the appellate court’s ruling. The Company accrued a liability of $9.2 million, representing the judgment plus accrued interest and legal costs, at December 31, 2003. In 2004, the Company paid $8.9 million, representing the amount of the judgment, accrued interest and amounts due for the attorneys’ fees. Based on the obligations assumed by the Company in connection with the acquisition of the property and the Company’s policy to indemnify officers and employees for actions taken during the course of company business, the judgment was not apportioned among the defendants (Note 15).

      In addition to the judgment discussed above, the Company and its subsidiaries are also subject to other legal proceedings. All such proceedings, taken together, are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company is also subject to a variety of legal actions for personal injury or property damage arising in the ordinary course of its business, most of which are covered by liability insurance. While the resolution of all matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the final outcome of such legal proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, financial position or results of operations.

 
12. Minority Equity Interests, Preferred Operating Partnership Minority Interests, Operating Partnership Minority Interests, Preferred Shares and Common Shares

     Minority Equity Interests

      The Company owns a controlling ownership interest in a shopping center and development parcels in Utah and Round Rock, Texas, a shopping center in Missouri assumed in connection with the JDN merger and a business center in Boston, Massachusetts. In July 2002, the Company acquired a controlling ownership interest (99.79%) in five shopping centers located in Forth Worth, Texas; Dallas, Texas; Columbia, South Carolina; Birmingham, Alabama and Wichita, Kansas and in December 2004, the Company purchased the remaining minority interest (Note 15). In December 2003, the Company purchased the remaining 5% interest in a management service company (Notes 2 and 15) and accordingly consolidated the ownership in a 83.75% joint venture interest in RVIP I which owns, as of December 31, 2004, one retail site formerly occupied by Best Products and a 79% interest in Coventry. The minority partners’ equity interest in these partnerships aggregated $23.7 million and $24.5 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

F-35


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

     Preferred Operating Partnership Minority Interests

      The Company held, through a consolidated partnership, a $75 million and $105 million private placement of 8.875% and 9.0%, cumulative perpetual preferred “down-REIT” preferred partnership units, respectively, (“Preferred OP Units”) with an institutional investor. In March 2003, these Preferred OP Units were redeemed for $175 million. The difference between the carrying amount of the Preferred OP Units of $175 million and the stated liquidation (i.e., redemption) amount of $180 million was recorded as a charge to net income applicable to common shareholders. This $5.0 million charge related to the recording of the original issuance costs associated with the Preferred OP Units.

     Operating Partnership Minority Interests

      At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had 1,349,822 and 1,128,692 OP Units outstanding, respectively. These OP Units are exchangeable, under certain circumstances and at the option of the Company, into an equivalent number of the Company’s common shares or for the equivalent amount of cash. The OP Unit holders are entitled to receive distributions, per OP Unit, generally equal to the per share distributions on the Company’s common shares.

      In 2004, the Company issued 505,435 OP Units in conjunction with the purchase of assets from Benderson. In 2003, in conjunction with the JDN merger, the Company issued 72,279 OP Units of its consolidated partnership in exchange for OP Units of JDN. The exchange rate of 0.518 per share was utilized in accordance with the merger agreement. In addition, the Company issued 145,196 OP Units in conjunction with the acquisition of a shopping center.

      In 2004, the Company exchanged 284,304 OP Units for common shares of the Company. These transactions were treated as a purchase of minority interest.

     Preferred Shares

      The Company’s preferred shares outstanding at December 31 are as follows (in thousands):

                 
2004 2003


Class F — 8.60% cumulative redeemable preferred shares, without par value, $250 liquidation value; 750,000 shares authorized; 600,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003
  $ 150,000     $ 150,000  
Class G — 8.0% cumulative redeemable preferred shares, without par value, $250 liquidation value; 750,000 shares authorized; 720,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003
    180,000       180,000  
Class H — 7.375% cumulative redeemable preferred shares, without par value, $500 liquidation value; 410,000 shares authorized;410,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003
    205,000       205,000  
Class I — 7.5% cumulative redeemable preferred shares, without par value, $500 liquidation value; 360,000 shares authorized; 360,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004
    170,000        
     
     
 
    $ 705,000     $ 535,000  
     
     
 

F-36


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      Preferred share issuances over the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                                 
Liquidation
Amount Dividend Net Proceeds
Issuance Issuance Date (In Millions) Rate (Millions)





Preferred I
    May 2004     $ 170.0       7.5 %   $ 164.2  
Preferred H (1)
    July 2003     $ 205.0       7.375 %   $ 197.9  
Preferred V (2)
    March 2003     $ 50.0       9.375 %   $ 50.0  
Preferred G (3)
    March 2003     $ 180.0       8.0 %   $ 173.6  
Preferred F (4)
    March 2002     $ 150.0       8.60 %   $ 144.6  


(1)  Proceeds from this offering were used to redeem all of the outstanding 8.375% Preferred C Depositary shares, 8.68% Preferred D Depositary Shares and 9.375% Preferred V shares for cash, aggregating approximately $204.0 million. The original issuance costs of the Class C and Class D shares aggregating $5.7 million was recorded as a charge to net income applicable to common shareholders upon redemption.
 
(2)  Issued in conjunction with the JDN merger and redeemed in September 2003. See (1) above.
 
(3)  Proceeds used to redeem the $180 million Preferred Units (discussed above).
 
(4)  Proceeds used to redeem all of the outstanding 9.5% Preferred A Depositary shares and 9.44% Preferred B Depositary Shares for cash, aggregating approximately $149.8 million. See discussion of Topic D-42 in Note 1 relating to the prior year restatement of the Class A and Class B redemption.

     The Class F and G depositary shares represent 1/10 of a share of their respective preferred class of shares and have a stated value of $250 per share and the Class H and I depositary shares represent 1/20 of a share of a preferred share and have a stated value of $500 per share. The Class F, Class G, Class H and Class I depositary shares are not redeemable by the Company prior to March 27, 2007; March 28, 2008; July 28, 2008 and May 7, 2009, respectively, except in certain circumstances relating to the preservation of the Company’s status as a REIT.

      The Company’s authorized preferred shares consist of the following:

  •  750,000 Class A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Class K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares, without par value
 
  •  750,000 Non Cumulative preferred shares, without par value

F-37


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

     Common Shares

      The Company’s common shares have a $0.10 per share stated value.

      Common share issuances over the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                 
Shares Net Proceeds
Issuance Date (Millions) (Millions)



December 2004
    5.45     $ 246  
May 2004
    15.0     $ 491  
March 2003
    18.0       (1)
February 2002
    1.7     $ 33.1  
February 2002
    2.5       (2)


(1)  Issued in conjunction with the JDN merger.
 
(2)  Issued in conjunction with the two shopping center properties.

     Common Shares in Treasury and Deferred Obligation

      In 2004 and 2003, certain officers and a director of the Company completed a stock for stock option exercise and received approximately 1.0 million and 1.2 million common shares, respectively, in exchange for 0.6 million and 0.7 million common shares of the Company. In 2003, the receipt of approximately 0.4 million of these common shares were deferred pursuant to a deferral plan. In addition, vesting of restricted stock grants approximating 0.1 million and 45,000 shares in 2004 and 2003, respectively, of common stock of the Company were deferred.

      The shares associated with the option exercises and restricted stock vesting were deferred into the Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Elective Deferred Compensation Plan, a non-qualified compensation plan. In connection with shares deferred, the Company recorded $1.9 million and $8.3 million in shareholders’ equity as deferred obligations in 2004 and 2003, respectively.

 
13. Other Income

      Other income from continuing operations was comprised of the following (in thousands):

                         
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Lease terminations and bankruptcy settlements
  $ 10,096     $ 6,896     $ 3,403  
Acquisitions and financing fees
    2,997       3,511       118  
Settlement of call option
          2,400        
Sale of option rights
          796       2,254  
Other, net
    272       366       579  
     
     
     
 
    $ 13,365     $ 13,969     $ 6,354  
     
     
     
 
 
14. Disposition of Real Estate and Real Estate Investments and Discontinued Operations

     Discontinued Operations

      During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company sold 36 properties, which were classified as discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 aggregating 2.1 million square feet. The Company did not have any properties considered as held for sale at December 31, 2004 or 2003. 29 of these properties had been previously included in the shopping center segment and seven of these centers had been

F-38


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

previously included in the business center segment (Note 19). The operations of these properties have been reflected on a comparative basis as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements for each of the three-years ended December 31, 2004, included herein.

      The operating results relating to assets sold or held for sale after December 31, 2001 are as follows (in thousands):

                           
For the Year Ended
December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Revenues
  $ 6,314     $ 8,769     $ 9,190  
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                       
 
Operating
    2,132       2,555       2,571  
 
Impairment charge
    586       2,640       4,730  
 
Interest, net
    788       1,284       1,453  
 
Depreciation
    1,070       2,064       2,213  
 
Minority interests
    4              
     
     
     
 
      4,580       8,543       10,967  
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
    1,734       226       (1,777 )
Gain on sale of real estate
    8,561       460       4,276  
     
     
     
 
    $ 10,295     $ 686     $ 2,499  
     
     
     
 

      During 2004, the Company recorded a net gain on the sale of 15 assets of $8.6 million. In the third quarter of 2004, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.6 million relating to the sale of a business center property and was reclassified into discontinued operations (see table above) due to the sale of the property in the fourth quarter of 2004.

      During 2003, the Company recorded a net gain on the sale of 13 assets of $0.5 million. In the second quarter of 2003, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2.6 million relating to the sale of two assets. This impairment charge was reclassified into discontinued operations (see table above) due to the sale of one of the assets in the third quarter of 2003 and the sale of the second asset in the first quarter of 2004. There was no gain or loss recognized upon the final sale of these assets.

      During 2002, the Company recorded a net gain on the sale of 8 assets of $4.3 million. In the second quarter of 2002, the Company received an unsolicited offer and entered into a contract to sell a wholly-owned shopping center located in Orlando, Florida and recorded a related impairment charge of approximately $4.7 million which was reclassified into discontinued operations upon the sale of the property in the fourth quarter of 2002.

     Disposition of Real Estate and Real Estate Investments

      During 2004, the Company recorded gains on disposition of real estate and real estate investments of approximately $84.6 million. The gain relates to the transfer of 11 assets to an effectively 14.5% owned joint venture which aggregated $65.4 million, 13 assets to a 20% owned joint venture which aggregated $2.5 million and 12 assets to a 10% owned joint venture which aggregated $4.2 million and are not classified as discontinued operations due to the Company’s continuing involvement due to its retained ownership interest and management control. In addition, land sales, which did not meet the discontinued operations disclosure requirement, aggregated $14.3 million of gains in 2004 and an additional $0.8 million relating to the release of obligations for assets sold in 2003. These gains were primarily offset by a loss on sale of non-core assets of approximately $2.6 million, which could be recovered through an earnout arrangement with the buyer over the next several years.

F-39


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      During 2003, the Company recorded gains on disposition of real estate and real estate investments of approximately $73.9 million. This gain relates in part to the transfer of seven shopping center assets to a 20% owned joint venture, which aggregated $25.8 million. Also included in this gain is the transfer of four shopping centers to a joint venture in which the Company effectively owns a 14.5% interest, which aggregated $41.3 million. Additionally, the Company recorded approximately $6.8 million relating to the sale of land, which did not meet the discontinued operations disclosure requirement.

      During 2002, the Company recorded gains on disposition of real estate and real estate investments aggregating approximately $3.4 million. This gain relates in part to the transfer of a 90% interest in a shopping center property located in Kildeer, Illinois, which resulted in a gain of $2.5 million and also land sales, which did not meet the discontinued operations disclosure requirement, resulting in an aggregate gain of $0.9 million.

 
15. Transactions With Related Parties

      As discussed in Note 13, the 0.21% minority interest in the five shopping centers acquired in 2002 was owned by the employees of an equity affiliate in which the Company effectively owns a 79% interest. The Company acquired this minority interest in December 2004 for approximately $2.6 million.

      As discussed in Note 2, the Company entered into the KLA/ SM joint venture in March 2002 with Lubert-Adler Funds, which is owned in part by a Director of the Company.

      As discussed in Note 2, the Company entered into a joint venture with Lubert-Adler Funds, which is owned in part by a Director of the Company, which was sold in connection with the MDT Joint Venture in November 2003. In September 1999, the Company transferred its interest in a shopping center under development in Coon Rapids, Minnesota, a suburb of Minneapolis, to a joint venture in which the Company retained a 25% economic interest. The remaining 75% economic interest was held by private equity funds (“Funds”) controlled by a Director of the Company. This Director holds a 0.5% economic interest in the Funds. The Company had a management agreement and performed certain administrative functions for the joint venture pursuant to which the Company earned management, leasing and development fees of $1.4 million, $0.6 million and $1.3 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company earned interest income of $1.2 million in 2004. In addition, in 2002 the Company recognized a gain of approximately $0.4 million, respectively, related to the sale of real estate to the joint venture for that portion not owned by the Company, determined utilizing the percentage of completion method.

      In December 2003, the Company purchased the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer’s 5% economic interest in its management service company for approximately $0.1 million, which represented the book value of the minority interest account. This entity was historically accounted for on the equity method of accounting. Upon acquisition of this interest, this entity was fully consolidated. These entities were originally structured in this format in order to meet certain REIT qualification requirements.

      In 1995, the Company entered into a lease for office space owned by the mother of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (“CEO”). General and administrative rental expense associated with this office space aggregated $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company utilizes a conference center owned by the trust of B. Wolstein, deceased founder of the Company, one of its principal shareholders for Company sponsored events and meetings. The Company paid $0.1 million, in 2003 and 2002, for the use of this facility.

      As discussed in Note 11, the Company assumed the liability for the Regal Cinemas judgment. The other defendants included a former executive of the Company and a real estate development partnership owned by this individual and the former Chairman of the Board, who was also a principal shareholder and a former director of the Company.

F-40


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      The Company was also a party to a lawsuit that involved various claims against the Company relating to certain management related services provided by the Company. The owner of the properties had entered into a management agreement with two entities (“Related Entities”) controlled by one of its principal shareholders and a former director of the Company, to provide management services. The Company agreed to perform those services on behalf of the Related Entities and the fees paid by the owner of the properties were paid to the Company. One of the services to be provided by the Company was to obtain and maintain casualty insurance for the owner’s properties. A loss was incurred at one of the owner’s properties and the insurance company denied coverage. The Company filed a lawsuit against the insurance company. Separately, the Company entered into a settlement pursuant to which the Company paid $750,000 to the owner of the properties in 2004, and agreed to indemnify the Related Entities for any loss or damage incurred by either of the Related Entities if it were judicially determined that the owner of the property is not entitled to receive insurance proceeds under a policy obtained and maintained by the Company.

      In connection with the settlement, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO, entered into a joint venture with the principal of the owner of the properties, and the Company entered into a management agreement with the joint venture effective February 1, 2004. The CEO holds an ownership interest of approximately 25.0% in the joint venture. The Company provides management and administrative services and receives fees equal to 3.0% of the gross income of each property for which services are provided, but not less than $5,000 per year from each such property, of which an aggregate of $0.1 million was earned in 2004. The management agreement expires on February 28, 2007, unless terminated earlier at any time by the joint venture upon 30 days’ notice to the Company or by the Company upon 60 days’ notice to the joint venture.

      The Company maintained certain management agreements with various partnership entities owned in part by one of its principle shareholders, in which management fee and leasing fee income of $0.1 million was earned in 2003 and 2002. Transactions with the Company’s equity affiliates have been described in Note 2.

 
16. Benefit Plans

     Stock Option and Other Equity-Based Plans

      The Company’s stock option and equity-based award plans provide for the grant, to employees of the Company, the following: Incentive and non-qualified stock options to purchase common shares of the Company, rights to receive the appreciation in value of common shares, awards of common shares subject to restrictions on transfer, awards of common shares issuable in the future upon satisfaction of certain conditions and rights to purchase common shares and other awards based on common shares. Under the terms of the award plans, awards available for grant approximated 3.3 million at December 31, 2004. Options may be granted at per share prices not less than fair market value at the date of grant, and in the case of incentive options, must be exercisable within ten years thereof (or, with respect to options granted to certain shareholders, within five years thereof). Options granted under the plans generally become exercisable one-year after the date of grant as to one-third of the optioned shares, with the remaining options being exercisable over the following two-year period.

      In 2004, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2004 Equity-Based Award Plan, which allows for the grant of up to 2.5 million common shares. In 2002, the shareholders approved the 2002 Equity-Based Award Plan, which allows for the grant of up to 3.1 million common shares.

      In 1997, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of 0.9 million stock options to the Company’s CEO, which vested immediately upon issuance. In addition, 0.7 million of these options, all of which were exercised in 2003, in a stock for stock option exercise (Note 12), were issued outside of a plan.

      The Company granted options to its directors. Such options were granted at the fair market value on the date of grant. Options granted generally become exercisable one year after the date of grant as to one-third of the optioned shares, with the remaining options being exercisable over the following two-year period.

F-41


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      The following table reflects the stock option activity described above (in thousands):

                                           
Number of Options Weighted-

Average Weighted-
Executive Exercise Average
Employees Directors Officer Price Fair Value





Balance December 31, 2001
    3,983       164       700     $ 16.50          
 
Granted
    900       20             20.38     $ 2.07  
 
Exercised
    (1,132 )     (20 )           15.53          
 
Canceled
    (73 )     (5 )           18.02          
     
     
     
     
         
Balance December 31, 2002
    3,678       159       700       17.51          
 
Granted
    892                   23.52     $ 2.23  
 
Exercised
    (1,709 )     (34 )     (700 )     16.13          
 
Canceled
    (76 )                 18.71          
     
     
     
     
         
Balance December 31, 2003
    2,785       125             20.48          
 
Granted
    665                   36.40     $ 3.40  
 
Exercised
    (1,402 )     (37 )           20.06          
 
Canceled
    (72 )                 26.92          
     
     
     
     
         
Balance December 31, 2004
    1,976       88           $ 25.66          
     
     
     
     
         

      The following table summarizes the characteristics of the options outstanding at December 31, 2004 (in thousands):

                                         
Options Outstanding Options Exercisable


Outstanding Weighted-Average Exercisable
Range of as of Remaining Weighted-Average as of Weighed-Average
Exercise Prices 12/31/04 Contractual Life Exercise Price 12/31/04 Exercise Price






$11.50-$16.00
    194       5.4     $ 13.20       194     $ 13.20  
$16.01-$20.00
    405       6.2     $ 19.54       185     $ 19.12  
$20.01-$28.50
    770       7.7       22.83       223       22.38  
$28.51-$37.00
    679       9.1       35.72       12       29.19  
$37.01-$45.50
    16       9.8       40.95              
     
     
     
     
     
 
      2,064       7.7     $ 25.66       614     $ 18.63  
     
     
     
     
     
 

      As of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, 0.6 million, 1.3 million and 3.1 million, respectively, were exercisable. The weighted average exercise prices of these exercisable options were $18.63, $19.33 and $17.47 at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

      In 2000, the Board of Directors approved a grant of 30,000 Performance Units to the Company’s CEO. Pursuant to the provisions of the plan, the 30,000 Performance Units granted were converted on December 31, 2004 to common share equivalents of 200,000 common shares based on the annualized total shareholders’ return for the five-year period ended December 31, 2004. These shares will vest over the following five-year period. In 2002, the Board of Directors approved grants aggregating 70,000 Performance Units to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and Executive Vice President. The 70,000 Performance Units granted in 2002 will be converted to common share equivalents ranging from 70,000 to 466,666 Common Shares based on the annualized total shareholders’ return for the five-year period ending December 31, 2006. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Board of Directors approved a grant of 120,508; 103,139 and 105,974 restricted shares of common stock, respectively, to several executives and outside directors of the Company. The restricted stock grants vest in equal annual

F-42


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

amounts over a five-year period for the Company’s executives and over a three-year period for the outside directors of the Company. These grants have a weighted average fair value at the date of grant ranging from $13.333 to $36.32, which was equal to the market value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, approximately $6.3 million, $5.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, was charged to expense associated with awards under the equity-based award plans relating to restricted stock and Performance Units.

      The Company applies APB 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, the Company does not recognize compensation cost for stock options when the option exercise price equals or exceeds the market value on the date of the grant. Assuming application of the fair value method pursuant to SFAS 123, the compensation cost, which is required to be charged against income for all of the above mentioned plans, was $5.1 million, $5.2 million and $2.5 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The amounts charged to expense are presented in the aforementioned paragraph. See Note 1 for pro forma presentation.

      For purposes of the pro forma presentation, the fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options pricing model using the following assumptions:

             
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Risk free interest rate (range)
  2.2%-3.3%   1.8%-3.1%   2.6%-5.4%
Dividend yield (range)
  4.5%-5.8%   5.5%-7.5%   6.6%-8.0%
Expected life (range)
  3-5 years   4-6 yrs   4-8 yrs.
Expected volatility (range)
  19.9%-22.7%   22.9%-24.6%   21.4%-26.1%

     401(k) Plan

      The Company has a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering substantially all of the officers and employees of the Company, which permits participants to defer up to a maximum of 15% of their compensation. In 2004 and 2003, the Company matched the participant’s contribution in an amount equal to 50% of the participant’s elective deferral for the plan year up to a maximum of 6% of a participant’s annual compensation. In 2002, the Company matched the first 3% of the participant’s contributions at an amount equal to 50% of the participant’s elective deferrals and the second 3% of the participant’s contributions at an amount equal to 25% of the participants’ elective deferrals for the plan year. The Company’s plan allows for the Company to also make additional discretionary contributions. No discretionary contributions have been made. Employees’ contributions are fully vested and the Company’s matching contributions vest 20% per year. Once an employee has been with the Company five years, all matching contributions are fully vested. The Company funds all matching contributions with cash. The Company’s contributions for the plan year ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The 401(k) plan is fully funded at December 31, 2004.

     Elective Deferred Compensation Plan

      The Company has a non-qualified elective deferred compensation plan for certain key executives which permits eligible employees to defer up to 100% of their compensation. In 2004 and 2003, the Company matched the participants contribution in an amount equal to 50% of the participants elective deferral for the plan year up to a maximum of 6% of a participants annual compensation after deducting contributions, if any, made in conjunction with the Company’s 401(k) plan. In 2002, the Company matched the first 3% of the participant’s contribution at an amount equal to 50% of the participant’s elective deferrals and the second 3% of the participant’s contributions at an amount equal to 25% of the participant’s elective deferral for the plan year. Deferred compensation related to an employee contribution is charged to expense and is fully vested. Deferred compensation related to the Company’s matching contribution is charged to expense and vests 20% per year.

F-43


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

Once an employee has been with the Company five years, all matching contributions are fully vested. The Company’s contribution for each of the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $0.1 million. At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, deferred compensation under this plan aggregated approximately $8.7 million, $6.0 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The plan is fully funded at December 31, 2004.

     Equity Deferred Compensation Plan

      In 2003, the Company established the Developers Diversified Realty Corporation Equity Deferred Compensation Plan, a non-qualified compensation plan, for certain key executives and directors of the Company to allow for the deferral of receipt of common stock of the Company with respect to eligible equity awards. See Note 12 regarding the deferral of stock to this plan. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were 0.6 million and 0.5 million common shares of the Company in the plan valued at $24.6 and $15.6 million, respectively. The Plan is fully funded at December 31, 2004.

     Other Compensation

      During 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company recorded a $0.8 million and $0.9 million and $2.0 million charge, respectively as additional compensation to the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO, relating to an incentive compensation agreement associated with the Company’s investment in the Retail Value Fund Program. Pursuant to this agreement the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is entitled to receive up to 25% of the distributions made by Coventry (Note 2), provided the Company achieves certain performance thresholds in relation to Funds From Operations growth and/or total shareholder return.

17.     Earnings and Dividends Per Share

      Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) have been computed pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 128.

      The following table provides a reconciliation of both income from continuing operations and the number of common shares used in the computations of “basic” EPS, which utilizes the weighted average of common shares outstanding without regard to dilutive potential common shares, and “diluted” EPS, which includes all such shares.

                           
For the Year Ended December 31,
As Adjusted

2004 2003 2002



(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
Income from continuing operations
  $ 177,826     $ 165,643     $ 96,042  
Add: Gain on disposition of real estate and real estate investments
    84,642       73,932       3,429  
Less: Preferred stock dividends
    (50,706 )     (40,495 )     (27,058 )
 
Write-off of original issuance costs associated with preferred operating partnership units and preferred shares redeemed
          (10,710 )      
 
Adjustment for effect of a change in accounting principle that is applied retroactively (Note 1)
                (5,544 )
     
     
     
 
Basic EPS — Income from continuing operations applicable to common shareholders
    211,762       188,370       66,869  
Add: Operating partnership minority interests
    2,607       1,769        
     
     
     
 
Diluted — Income from continuing operations applicable to common shareholders
  $ 214,369     $ 190,139     $ 66,869  
     
     
     
 

F-44


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

                           
For the Year Ended December 31,
As Adjusted

2004 2003 2002



(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
Number of Shares:
                       
Basic — average shares outstanding
    96,638       81,903       63,807  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                       
 
Stock options
    997       1,131       954  
 
Operating partnership minority interests
    1,308       1,078        
 
Restricted stock
    81       76       76  
     
     
     
 
Diluted — average shares outstanding
    99,024       84,188       64,837  
     
     
     
 
Per share data:
                       
Basic earnings per share data:
                       
 
Income from continuing operations applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.19     $ 2.30     $ 1.05  
 
Income from discontinued operations
    0.11       0.01       0.04  
 
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (0.03 )            
     
     
     
 
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.27     $ 2.31     $ 1.09  
     
     
     
 
Diluted earnings per share data:
                       
 
Income from continuing operations applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.17     $ 2.26     $ 1.03  
 
Income from discontinued operations
    0.10       0.01       0.04  
 
Cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    (0.03 )            
     
     
     
 
 
Net income applicable to common shareholders
  $ 2.24     $ 2.27     $ 1.07  
     
     
     
 

      Options to purchase 2.1 million, 2.9 million and 4.5 million shares of common stock were outstanding at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively (Note 16), a portion of which has been reflected above in diluted per share amounts using the treasury stock method. Options aggregating 0.5 million were antidilutive at December 31, 2002 (none were antidilutive in 2003 and 2004) and excluded from the computations.

      Basic average shares outstanding do not include restricted shares totaling 202,198, 209,684 and 190,455 respectively, which were not vested at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002.

      For one joint venture where the joint venture partner has the right to convert its interest in the partnership to common shares of the Company or cash, at the election of the Company, it is the Company’s intent to settle the conversion, if any, in cash.

      The exchange into common stock of the minority interests, associated with OP Units, was not included in the computation of diluted EPS for 2002 because the effect of assuming conversion was antidilutive (Note 12).

      The redemption of the $35 million Preferred OP Units, including those exercisable through the exercise of the warrant into common shares, was not included in the computation of diluted EPS for 2002 because they were considered contingently issuable through the redemption date (Note 13).

18.     Federal Income Taxes

      The Company elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1993. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that

F-45


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

the Company distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders. It is management’s current intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company’s REIT status. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on taxable income it distributes currently to its stockholders. As the Company distributed sufficient taxable income for the three years ended December 31, 2004, no U.S. Federal income or excise taxes were incurred.

      If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income. In addition, the Company has two taxable REIT subsidiaries that generate taxable income from non-REIT activities and are subject to federal, state and local income taxes.

      At December 31, 2004, the accompanying financial statement basis of assets and liabilities exceeds the tax basis by approximately $78 million. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the tax basis of assets and liabilities exceeds the accompanying financial statement basis by approximately $37 million and $162 million, respectively.

      The following represents the combined activity of all of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The disclosure of the majority of the amounts in 2003 and all of the amounts in 2002 relate to entities recorded on the equity method of accounting until December 31, 2003 (in thousands):

                               
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Book (loss) income before income taxes
  $ (5,952 )   $ (6,168 )   $ 3,941  
     
     
     
 
Components of income tax expense (benefit) are as follows:
                       
 
Current:
                       
   
Federal
          (457 )     1,691  
     
State and local
          (67 )     249  
     
     
     
 
            (524 )     1,940  
     
     
     
 
 
Deferred:
                       
   
Federal
    366       (591 )     351  
     
State and local
    53       (87 )     51  
     
     
     
 
      419       (678 )     402  
     
     
     
 
 
Total expense (benefit)
  $ 419     $ (1,202 )   $ 2,342  
     
     
     
 

      The differences between total income tax expense or benefit and the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before taxes were as follows (in thousands):

                         
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Statutory rate of 34% applied to pre-tax (loss) income
  $ (2,024 )   $ (2,097 )   $ 1,340  
Effect of state and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
    (298 )     (308 )     197  
Valuation allowance (decrease) increase
    (1,226 )     3,454       (1,432 )
Other
    3,967       (2,251 )     2,237  
     
     
     
 
Total expense (benefit)
  $ 419     $ (1,202 )   $ 2,342  
     
     
     
 
Effective tax rate
    (7.04 )%     19.49 %     59.43 %
     
     
     
 

F-46


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      Deferred tax assets and liabilities of the Company’s taxable REIT subsidiaries were as follows (in thousands):

                           
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Deferred tax assets (1)
  $ 49,390     $ 48,706     $ 1,484  
Deferred tax liabilities
    (3,863 )     (1,534 )     (1,177 )
Valuation allowance (1)
    (46,225 )     (47,451 )     (1,264 )
     
     
     
 
 
Net deferred tax liability
  $ (698 )   $ (279 )   $ (957 )
     
     
     
 


(1)  The majority of the deferred tax assets and valuation allowance is attributable to interest expense, subject to limitations, and basis differentials in assets due to purchase price accounting.

     Reconciliation between GAAP net income to taxable income is as follows (in thousands):

                           
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



GAAP net income
  $ 269,762     $ 240,261     $ 101,970  
 
Add: Book depreciation and amortization (1)
    38,999       34,725       34,142  
 
Less: Tax depreciation and amortization (1)
    (31,066 )     (60,832 )     (25,219 )
 
Book/tax differences on gains/losses from capital transactions
    (7,006 )     (23,371 )     (600 )
 
Joint venture equity in earnings, net (1)
    (64,578 )     (40,766 )     8,084  
 
Dividends from subsidiary REIT investments
    32,997       37,750       9,500  
 
Deferred income
    (2,085 )     (7,200 )     1,926  
 
Compensation expense
    2,301       3,832       (4,410 )
 
Legal judgment
    (9,190 )     9,190        
 
Miscellaneous book/tax differences, net
    (8,503 )     (8,589 )     749  
     
     
     
 
Taxable income before adjustments
    221,631       185,000       126,142  
 
Less: Capital gains
    (73,110 )     (73,572 )     (9,782 )
     
     
     
 
Taxable income subject to the 90% dividend requirement
  $ 148,521     $ 111,428     $ 116,360  
     
     
     
 


(1)  Depreciation expense from majority-owned subsidiaries and affiliates, which are consolidated for financial reporting purposes, but not for tax reporting purposes, is included in the reconciliation item “Joint venture equity in earnings, net.”

     Reconciliation between cash dividends paid and the dividends paid deduction is as follows (in thousands):

                           
For the Year Ended December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Cash dividends paid
  $ 226,537     $ 168,918     $ 122,841  
 
Less: Dividends designated to prior year
    (19,557 )     (3,475 )     (174 )
 
Plus: Dividends designated from the following year
    14,651       19,557       3,475  
 
Less: Portion designated capital gain distribution
    (73,110 )     (73,572 )     (9,782 )
     
     
     
 
Dividends paid deduction
  $ 148,521     $ 111,428     $ 116,360  
     
     
     
 

F-47


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

      Characterization of distributions is as follows (per share):

                         
For the Year Ended
December 31,

2004 2003 2002



Ordinary income
  $ 1.19     $ 1.05     $ 1.44  
Capital gains
    0.51       0.43       0.10  
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain
    0.08       0.26       0.02  
     
     
     
 
    $ 1.78     $ 1.74     $ 1.56  
     
     
     
 

      A portion of the fourth quarter dividends for each of the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 have been allocated and reported to shareholders in the subsequent year. Dividends per share reported to shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are summarized as follows:

                                 
Capital
Gross Ordinary Gain Total
2004 Dividends Date Paid Income Distributions Dividends





4th quarter 2003
    01/05/04     $ 0.18     $ 0.10     $ 0.28  
1st quarter
    04/05/04       0.31       0.15       0.46  
2nd quarter
    07/06/04       0.31       0.15       0.46  
3rd quarter
    10/04/04       0.34       0.17       0.51  
4th quarter
    01/06/05       0.05       0.02       0.07  
             
     
     
 
            $ 1.19     $ 0.59     $ 1.78  
             
     
     
 
                                 
Capital
Gross Ordinary Gain Total
2003 Dividends Date Paid Income Distributions Dividends





4th quarter 2002
    01/06/03     $ 0.19     $ 0.14     $ 0.33  
1st quarter
    04/07/03       0.25       0.16       0.41  
2nd quarter
    07/07/03       0.25       0.16       0.41  
3rd quarter
    10/06/03       0.25       0.16       0.41  
4th quarter
    01/05/04       0.11       0.07       0.18  
             
     
     
 
            $ 1.05     $ 0.69     $ 1.74  
             
     
     
 
                                 
Capital
Gross Ordinary Gain Total
2002 Dividends Date Paid Income Distributions Dividends





4th quarter 2001
    01/07/02     $ 0.34     $ 0.03     $ 0.37  
1st quarter
    04/08/02       0.35       0.03       0.38  
2nd quarter
    07/08/02       0.35       0.03       0.38  
3rd quarter
    10/07/02       0.35       0.03       0.38  
4th quarter
    01/06/03       0.05       0.00       0.05  
             
     
     
 
            $ 1.44     $ 0.12     $ 1.56  
             
     
     
 

19.     Segment Information

      The Company has two reportable business segments, shopping centers and business centers, determined in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” Each shopping center and business center is considered a separate operating segment. However, each segment on a

F-48


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

stand alone basis is less than 10% of the revenues, profit or loss, and assets of the combined reported operating segments and meets the majority of the aggregation criteria under SFAS 131.

      At December 31, 2004, the shopping center segment consisted of 436 shopping centers including, 168 owned through joint ventures, in 44 states aggregating approximately 71.0 million square feet of Company-owned GLA. These shopping centers range in size from approximately 10,000 square feet to 750,000 square feet of Company-owned GLA. The business center segment consists of 32 business centers in 11 states aggregating approximately 4.0 million square feet of Company-owned GLA. These business centers range in size from approximately 10,000 square feet to 330,000 square feet of Company-owned GLA.

      The table below presents information about the Company’s reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands).

                                 
2004

Business Shopping
Centers Centers Other Total




Total revenues
  $ 33,707     $ 565,226             $ 598,933  
Operating expenses
    (11,158 )     (138,456 )             (149,614 )
     
     
             
 
      22,549       426,770               449,319  
Unallocated expenses (A)
                  $ (307,375 )     (307,375 )
Equity in net income of joint ventures
            40,895               40,895  
Minority interests
                    (5,013 )     (5,013 )
                             
 
Income from continuing operations
                          $ 177,826  
                             
 
Total real estate assets
  $ 264,615     $ 5,338,809             $ 5,603,424  
     
     
             
 
                                 
2003

Business Shopping
Centers Centers Other Total




Total revenues
  $ 34,246     $ 431,488             $ 465,734  
Operating expenses
    (11,222 )     (106,945 )             (118,167 )
     
     
             
 
      23,024       324,543               347,567  
Unallocated expenses (A)
                  $ (229,476 )     (229,476 )
Equity in net income of joint ventures
            44,967               44,967  
Gain on sale of joint venture interests
            7,950               7,950  
Minority interests
                    (5,365 )     (5,365 )
                             
 
Income from continuing operations
                          $ 165,643  
                             
 
Total real estate assets
  $ 266,104     $ 3,618,807             $ 3,884,911  
     
     
             
 

F-49


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

                                 
2002

Business Shopping
Centers Centers Other Total




Total revenues
  $ 34,804     $ 311,897             $ 346,701  
Operating expenses
    (11,089 )     (73,613 )             (84,702 )
     
     
             
 
      23,715       238,284               261,999  
Unallocated expenses (A)
                  $ (177,156 )     (177,156 )
Equity in net income of joint ventures
            32,769               32,769  
Minority interests
                    (21,570 )     (21,570 )
                             
 
Income from continuing operations
                          $ 96,042  
                             
 
Total real estate assets
  $ 276,425     $ 2,527,631             $ 2,804,056  
     
     
             
 


(A)  Unallocated expenses consist of general and administrative, interest income and interest expense, tax expense, other expense and depreciation and amortization as listed in the consolidated statements of operations.

20.     Subsequent Events

      In January 2005, the Company completed the acquisition of 15 Puerto Rican retail real estate assets, totaling nearly 5.0 million square feet from Caribbean Property Group, LLC (“CPG”), at an aggregate cost of approximately $1.15 billion. The financing of the acquisition was comprised of the Company’s $250 million common equity offering in December 2004, $660 million of assumed debt and $332 million of proceeds generated by sales of neighborhood grocery-anchored centers to joint ventures and other recent asset sales, including $96.6 million of sales pursuant to the MDT Joint Venture.

      Through March 15, 2005, the Company sold an additional nine properties to the MDT Joint Venture for approximately $284.2 million. The Company maintains an approximate 14.5% ownership in the properties. The Company will remain responsible for all day-to-day operations of the properties and will receive its share of ongoing fees at prevailing rates for property management, leasing and construction management, plus nominal one-time fees for financing and due diligence.

      In March 2005, the Company repaid the $150 million on the Term Loan from borrowings on the Company’s Unsecured Credit Facility.

F-50


Table of Contents

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — Continued

21. Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)

      The following table sets forth the quarterly results of operations, restated for discontinued operations, for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

                                           
First Second Third Fourth Total





2004:
                                       
Revenues
  $ 125,134     $ 148,738     $ 165,828                  
Revenues of sold properties transferred to discontinued operations
    (1,952 )     (1,836 )     (1,801 )                
     
     
     
                 
Revenues
    123,182       146,902       164,027     $ 164,822     $ 598,933  
Income before cumulative effect of adoption of a new accounting standard
    53,787       86,812       44,316       87,848       272,763  
Net income
    50,786       86,812       44,316       87,848       269,762  
Net income applicable to common shareholders
    40,182       74,295       30,524       74,055       219,056  
Basic:
                                       
 
Net income per common share
  $ 0.47     $ 0.78     $ 0.30     $ 0.72     $ 2.27  
 
Weighted average number of shares
    86,344       95,018       102,079       102,979       96,638  
Diluted:
                                       
 
Net income per common share
  $ 0.46     $ 0.77     $ 0.30     $ 0.71     $ 2.24  
 
Weighted average number of shares
    87,646       97,415       103,030       105,264       99,024  
                                           
First Second Third Fourth Total





2003:
                                       
Revenues
  $ 101,907     $ 123,106     $ 123,411                  
Revenues of sold properties transferred to discontinued operations
    (1,767 )     (2,921 )     (2,260 )                
     
     
     
                 
Revenues
    100,140       120,185       121,151     $ 124,258     $ 465,734  
Net income
    38,385       68,402       41,988       91,486       240,261  
Net income applicable to common shareholders
    26,510       57,140       24,525       80,881       189,056  
Basic:
                                       
 
Net income per common share
  $ 0.38     $ 0.67     $ 0.29     $ 0.94     $ 2.31  
 
Weighted average number of shares
    70,087       85,032       85,997       86,206       81,903  
Diluted:
                                       
 
Net income per common share
  $ 0.37     $ 0.66     $ 0.28     $ 0.92     $ 2.27  
 
Weighted average number of shares
    71,218       87,667       87,066       88,414       84,188  

F-51


Table of Contents

SCHEDULE II

DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY CORPORATION

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES

For the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(In thousands)
                                   
Balance at Balance at
beginning of Charged end of
year to expense Deductions year




Year ended December 31, 2004
                               
 
Allowance for uncollectible accounts
  $ 15,206     $ 5,268     $ 6,282     $ 14,192  
 
Valuation allowance for a deferred tax asset
  $ 48,081     $     $ 1,856     $ 46,225  
     
     
     
     
 
Year ended December 31, 2003
                               
 
Allowance for uncollectible accounts
  $ 6,824     $ 6,135     $ (2,247 )(1)   $ 15,206  
 
Valuation allowance for a deferred tax asset
  $     $     $ (48,081 )(2)   $ 48,081  
     
     
     
     
 
Year ended December 31, 2002
                               
 
Allowance for uncollectible accounts
  $ 5,646     $ 5,854     $ 4,676     $ 6,824  
     
     
     
     
 


(1)  Includes approximately $4.6 million of reserves associated with the JDN merger.
 
(2)  Associated with the JDN merger.

F-52


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
Schedule III
                                                         
Initial Cost Total Cost (B)


Buildings & Buildings & Accumulated
Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total Depreciation







Brandon, FL
  $ 0     $ 4,111     $ 0     $ 0     $ 6,199     $ 6,199     $ 4,475  
Stow, OH
    1,036       9,028       0       993       22,995       23,988       7,263  
Fern Park, FL (Orlando)
    446       303       97       446       477       923       357  
Plainville, CT
    19,103       38,957       0       19,103       42,387       61,490       3,265  
Westlake, OH
    424       3,803       203       424       10,011       10,435       4,748  
E. Norriton, PA
    80       4,698       233       70       8,523       8,593       5,324  
Palm Harbor, FL
    1,137       4,089       0       1,137       4,172       5,309       1,345  
Tarpon Springs, FL
    248       7,382       81       244       12,009       12,253       8,403  
Bayonet Pt., FL
    2,113       8,181       128       2,169       11,622       13,791       5,739  
Starkville, MS
    1,271       8,209       0       703       6,544       7,247       1,860  
Gulfport, MS
    8,795       36,370       0       8,795       38,084       46,879       2,363  
Tupelo, MS
    2,282       14,979       0       2,213       17,425       19,638       5,188  
Jacksonville, FL
    3,005       9,425       0       3,028       9,612       12,640       3,041  
Brunswick, MA
    3,836       15,459       0       3,796       18,359       22,155       4,348  
Oceanside, CA
    0       10,643       0       0       13,833       13,833       1,521  
Reno, NV
    0       366       0       0       727       727       69  
Everett, MA
    9,311       44,647       0       9,311       49,278       58,589       5,384  
Salisbury, MD
    1,531       9,174       0       1,531       9,391       10,922       1,527  
Atlanta, GA
    475       9,374       0       475       9,948       10,423       3,617  
Jackson, MS
    4,190       6,783       0       4,190       6,783       10,973       416  
Saltillo, MS
    2,217       4,132       0       2,217       4,145       6,362       254  
Gadsen, AL
    322       965       0       322       1,814       2,136       118  
Jackson, MS (Metro)
    622       2,271       0       622       2,271       2,893       138  
Opelika, AL
    3,183       11,666       0       2,415       11,666       14,081       707  
Scottsboro, AL
    788       2,781       0       788       2,786       3,574       169  
Brandon, FL (Village)
    7,005       8,531       0       7,005       8,615       15,620       530  
Brandon, FL (Plaza)
    2,781       17,104       0       2,781       17,104       19,885       995  
Gulf Breeze, FL
    2,485       2,214       0       2,485       2,214       4,699       138  
Ocala, FL
    1,916       3,893       0       1,916       3,895       5,811       238  
Tallahassee, FL
    1,881       2,956       0       1,881       4,274       6,155       206  
Canton, GA (Riverplace)
    5,087       5,245       0       5,087       5,252       10,339       325  
Cartersville, GA
    4,572       4,510       0       4,572       4,511       9,083       281  
Chamblee, GA
    5,862       5,971       0       5,862       6,053       11,915       384  
Cumming, GA (Marketplace)
    14,255       23,653       0       14,549       23,767       38,316       1,441  
Douglasville, GA
    3,856       9,625       0       3,540       9,625       13,165       586  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
         
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation

Brandon, FL
  $ 1,724  
Stow, OH
    16,725  
Fern Park, FL (Orlando)
    566  
Plainville, CT
    58,225  
Westlake, OH
    5,687  
E. Norriton, PA
    3,269  
Palm Harbor, FL
    3,964  
Tarpon Springs, FL
    3,850  
Bayonet Pt., FL
    8,052  
Starkville, MS
    5,387  
Gulfport, MS
    44,516  
Tupelo, MS
    14,450  
Jacksonville, FL
    9,599  
Brunswick, MA
    17,807  
Oceanside, CA
    12,312  
Reno, NV
    658  
Everett, MA
    53,205  
Salisbury, MD
    9,395  
Atlanta, GA
    6,806  
Jackson, MS
    10,557  
Saltillo, MS
    6,108  
Gadsen, AL
    2,018  
Jackson, MS (Metro)
    2,755  
Opelika, AL
    13,374  
Scottsboro, AL
    3,405  
Brandon, FL (Village)
    15,090  
Brandon, FL (Plaza)
    18,890  
Gulf Breeze, FL
    4,561  
Ocala, FL
    5,573  
Tallahassee, FL
    5,949  
Canton, GA (Riverplace)
    10,014  
Cartersville, GA
    8,802  
Chamblee, GA
    11,531  
Cumming, GA (Marketplace)
    36,875  
Douglasville, GA
    12,579  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                         
Depreciable Date of
Lives Construction (C)
Encumbrances (Years) (1) Acquisition (A)



Brandon, FL
  $ 0       S/L 30       1972(C)  
Stow, OH
    0       S/L 30       1969(C)  
Fern Park, FL (Orlando)
    0       S/L 30       1970(C)  
Plainville, CT
    0       S/L 31.5       1999(C)  
Westlake, OH
    0       S/L 30       1974(C)  
E. Norriton, PA
    0       S/L 30       1975(C)  
Palm Harbor, FL
    0       S/L 31.5       1995(A)  
Tarpon Springs, FL
    0       S/L 30       1974(C)  
Bayonet Pt., FL
    5,327       S/L 30       1985(C)  
Starkville, MS
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Gulfport, MS
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Tupelo, MS
    11,752       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Jacksonville, FL
    6,743       S/L 31.5       1995(A)  
Brunswick, MA
    0       S/L 30       1973(C)  
Oceanside, CA
    0       S/L 31.5       2000(C)  
Reno, NV
    0       S/L 31.5       2000(C)  
Everett, MA
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(C)  
Salisbury, MD
    0       S/L 31.5       1999(C)  
Atlanta, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Jackson, MS
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Saltillo, MS
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Gadsen, AL
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Jackson, MS (Metro)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Opelika, AL
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Scottsboro, AL
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Brandon, FL (Village)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Brandon, FL (Plaza)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Gulf Breeze, FL
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Ocala, FL
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Tallahassee, FL
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Canton, GA (Riverplace)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Cartersville, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Chamblee, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Cumming, GA (Marketplace)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Douglasville, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  

F-53


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation — (Continued)
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
                                                         
Initial Cost Total Cost (B)


Buildings & Buildings & Accumulated
Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total Depreciation







Athens, GA
    1,649       2,084       0       3,455       2,084       5,539       128  
Ft. Oglethorpe, GA
    1,395       2,517       0       1,395       2,552       3,947       156  
Griffin, GA
    138       2,638       0       138       2,638       2,776       159  
Columbus, GA
    4,220       8,159       0       4,220       8,159       12,379       499  
Lafayette, GA
    1,493       2,572       0       1,493       2,572       4,065       158  
Lithonia, GA
    2,352       7,967       0       3,299       10,890       14,189       454  
Madison, GA
    1,816       2,297       0       1,816       2,361       4,177       142  
Newnan, GA
    2,632       11,063       0       2,632       11,063       13,695       671  
Stockbridge, GA (Freeway)
    963       1,911       0       963       1,911       2,874       117  
Stockbridge, GA (Pike)
    987       972       0       987       972       1,959       60  
Union City, GA
    2,288       6,246       0       2,288       6,245       8,533       380  
Tucker, GA
    1,121       10,299       0       1,171       10,802       11,973       620  
Warner Robins, GA
    5,977       7,459       0       5,977       7,459       13,436       459  
Woodstock, GA
    2,022       8,440       0       2,022       8,445       10,467       513  
Fayetteville, NC
    8,524       10,627       0       8,524       11,075       19,599       622  
Hendersonville, NC
    2,049       1,718       0       2,049       1,758       3,807       110  
Charleston, SC
    3,479       9,850       0       3,479       9,912       13,391       600  
Denver, CO (University)
    20,733       22,818       0       20,733       22,862       43,595       1,418  
Irving, TX
    4,980       12,336       0       5,880       14,500       20,380       743  
Chattanooga, TN
    1,845       13,214       0       1,845       14,864       16,709       838  
Memphis, TN
    2,034       3,726       0       2,034       3,737       5,771       229  
Hendersonville, TN
    3,743       9,268       0       3,743       9,268       13,011       565  
Murfreesboro, TN (Memorial)
    1,462       4,355       0       1,462       4,475       5,937       270  
Monaca, PA
    10,620       9,790       0       371       4,752       5,123       0  
Chester, VA
    10,780       4,752       0       10,780       4,822       15,602       317  
Lynchburg, VA
    5,447       11,194       0       5,447       11,215       16,662       689  
Midlothian, VA
    2,982       4,143       0       2,982       4,147       7,129       258  
Brookfield, WI
    9,321       5,358       0       9,321       5,358       14,679       341  
Brown Deer, WI (Market)
    2,006       10,059       0       2,006       10,059       12,065       609  
Brown Deer, WI (Center)
    14,615       7,555       0       14,615       7,555       22,170       489  
Milwaukee, WI
    4,527       3,600       0       4,527       3,600       8,127       226  
Decatur, IL
    767       2,224       0       700       2,224       2,924       135  
Gallipolis, OH
    1,249       1,790       0       1,249       1,790       3,039       110  
Lexington, KY (South)
    3,344       2,805       0       3,344       2,805       6,149       175  
Lexington, KY (North)
    2,915       3,447       0       2,919       3,471       6,390       216  
Richmond, KY
    1,870       5,661       0       1,870       5,661       7,531       344  
Overland Park, KS
    2,720       2,702       0       855       3,486       4,341       185  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
         
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation

Athens, GA
    5,411  
Ft. Oglethorpe, GA
    3,791  
Griffin, GA
    2,617  
Columbus, GA
    11,880  
Lafayette, GA
    3,907  
Lithonia, GA
    13,735  
Madison, GA
    4,035  
Newnan, GA
    13,024  
Stockbridge, GA (Freeway)
    2,757  
Stockbridge, GA (Pike)
    1,899  
Union City, GA
    8,153  
Tucker, GA
    11,353  
Warner Robins, GA
    12,977  
Woodstock, GA
    9,954  
Fayetteville, NC
    18,977  
Hendersonville, NC
    3,697  
Charleston, SC
    12,791  
Denver, CO (University)
    42,177  
Irving, TX
    19,637  
Chattanooga, TN
    15,871  
Memphis, TN
    5,542  
Hendersonville, TN
    12,446  
Murfreesboro, TN (Memorial)
    5,667  
Monaca, PA
    5,123  
Chester, VA
    15,285  
Lynchburg, VA
    15,973  
Midlothian, VA
    6,871  
Brookfield, WI
    14,338  
Brown Deer, WI (Market)
    11,456  
Brown Deer, WI (Center)
    21,681  
Milwaukee, WI
    7,901  
Decatur, IL
    2,789  
Gallipolis, OH
    2,929  
Lexington, KY (South)
    5,974  
Lexington, KY (North)
    6,174  
Richmond, KY
    7,187  
Overland Park, KS
    4,156  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                         
Depreciable Date of
Lives Construction (C)
Encumbrances (Years) (1) Acquisition (A)



Athens, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Ft. Oglethorpe, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Griffin, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Columbus, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Lafayette, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Lithonia, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Madison, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Newnan, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Stockbridge, GA (Freeway)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Stockbridge, GA (Pike)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Union City, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Tucker, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Warner Robins, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Woodstock, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Fayetteville, NC
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Hendersonville, NC
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Charleston, SC
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Denver, CO (University)
    28,884       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Irving, TX
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Chattanooga, TN
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Memphis, TN
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Hendersonville, TN
    9,337       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Murfreesboro, TN (Memorial)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Monaca, PA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Chester, VA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Lynchburg, VA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Midlothian, VA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Brookfield, WI
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Brown Deer, WI (Market)
    2,773       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Brown Deer, WI (Center)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Milwaukee, WI
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Decatur, IL
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Gallipolis, OH
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Lexington, KY (South)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Lexington, KY (North)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Richmond, KY
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Overland Park, KS
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  

F-54


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation — (Continued)
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
                                                         
Initial Cost Total Cost (B)


Buildings & Buildings & Accumulated
Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total Depreciation







Aurora, CO
    2,615       18,447       0       1,539       19,034       20,573       1,031  
Parker, CO (Flatacres)
    1,088       9,899       0       1,534       13,922       15,456       416  
Allentown, PA
    5,882       20,060       0       5,882       20,071       25,953       1,169  
St. John, MO
    2,613       7,040       0       2,827       7,692       10,519       394  
Suwanee, GA
    13,479       23,923       0       13,479       24,267       37,746       1,492  
West Allis, WI
    2,452       10,982       0       2,452       10,982       13,434       666  
Grandville, MI
    2,645       21,554       0       2,361       21,936       24,297       1,112  
Ft. Collins, CO
    2,767       2,054       0       1,845       4,376       6,221       132  
Parker, CO
    1,366       12,998       0       1,196       15,359       16,555       743  
Lafayette, IN
    1,217       2,689       0       1,217       2,689       3,906       164  
McDonough, GA
    1,027       2,058       0       1,582       2,804       4,386       91  
Stone Mountain, GA
    2,156       0       0       2,170       0       2,170       0  
Frisco, TX
    705       5,083       0       496       6,225       6,721       305  
McKinney, TX
    3,550       8,281       0       3,279       8,318       11,597       508  
Mesquite, TX
    3,507       16,529       0       4,281       19,660       23,941       974  
Hamilton, NJ
    8,039       49,896       0       11,530       67,634       79,164       2,568  
Lansing, MI
    1,598       6,999       0       1,329       7,142       8,471       412  
Grand Forks, ND
    526       2,166       0       549       2,550       3,099       609  
Erie, PA (Peach)
    10,880       19,201       0       6,373       43,802       50,175       11,123  
Erie, PA (Hills)
    0       2,564       13       0       3,841       3,841       3,078  
San Francisco, CA
    15,332       35,803       0       6,075       14,189       20,264       1,244  
Chillicothe, OH
    43       2,549       2       1,170       4,366       5,536       1,283  
Martinsville, VA
    3,163       28,819       0       3,163       28,819       31,982       12,657  
Tampa, FL (Waters)
    4,105       6,640       324       3,905       7,365       11,270       3,338  
Macedonia, OH (Phase II)
    4,392       10,885       0       4,392       10,996       15,388       1,956  
Huber Hts, OH
    757       14,469       1       757       14,606       15,363       5,332  
Lebanon, OH
    651       911       31       812       1,744       2,556       426  
Wilmington, OH
    157       1,616       51       157       1,886       2,043       1,589  
Hillsboro, OH
    80       1,985       0       80       2,003       2,083       1,793  
Xenia, OH
    948       3,938       0       673       6,267       6,940       2,064  
Boardman, OH
    9,025       27,983       0       8,152       28,013       36,165       6,610  
Solon, OH
    6,220       7,454       0       6,220       20,855       27,075       3,708  
Cincinnati, OH
    2,399       11,238       172       2,399       12,534       14,933       4,710  
Bedford, IN
    706       8,425       6       1,067       10,077       11,144       3,432  
Watertown, SD
    63       6,443       442       63       9,558       9,621       6,622  
Connersville, IN
    540       6,458       0       540       6,601       7,141       2,335  
Ashland, OH
    210       2,273       0       143       2,413       2,556       2,157  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
         
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation

Aurora, CO
    19,542  
Parker, CO (Flatacres)
    15,040  
Allentown, PA
    24,784  
St. John, MO
    10,125  
Suwanee, GA
    36,254  
West Allis, WI
    12,768  
Grandville, MI
    23,185  
Ft. Collins, CO
    6,089  
Parker, CO
    15,812  
Lafayette, IN
    3,742  
McDonough, GA
    4,295  
Stone Mountain, GA
    2,170  
Frisco, TX
    6,416  
McKinney, TX
    11,089  
Mesquite, TX
    22,967  
Hamilton, NJ
    76,596  
Lansing, MI
    8,059  
Grand Forks, ND
    2,490  
Erie, PA (Peach)
    39,052  
Erie, PA (Hills)
    763  
San Francisco, CA
    19,020  
Chillicothe, OH
    4,253  
Martinsville, VA
    19,325  
Tampa, FL (Waters)
    7,932  
Macedonia, OH (Phase II)
    13,432  
Huber Hts, OH
    10,031  
Lebanon, OH
    2,130  
Wilmington, OH
    454  
Hillsboro, OH
    290  
Xenia, OH
    4,876  
Boardman, OH
    29,555  
Solon, OH
    23,367  
Cincinnati, OH
    10,223  
Bedford, IN
    7,712  
Watertown, SD
    2,999  
Connersville, IN
    4,806  
Ashland, OH
    399  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                         
Depreciable Date of
Lives Construction (C)
Encumbrances (Years) (1) Acquisition (A)



Aurora, CO
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Parker, CO (Flatacres)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Allentown, PA
    18,665       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
St. John, MO
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Suwanee, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
West Allis, WI
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Grandville, MI
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Ft. Collins, CO
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Parker, CO
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Lafayette, IN
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
McDonough, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Stone Mountain, GA
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Frisco, TX
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
McKinney, TX
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Mesquite, TX
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Hamilton, NJ
    56,971       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Lansing, MI
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Grand Forks, ND
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Erie, PA (Peach)
    28,550       S/L 31.5       1995(C)  
Erie, PA (Hills)
    0       S/L 30       1973(C)  
San Francisco, CA
    0       S/L 31.5       2002(A)  
Chillicothe, OH
    0       S/L 30       1974(C)  
Martinsville, VA
    19,859       S/L 30       1989(C)  
Tampa, FL (Waters)
    0       S/L 31.5       1990(C)  
Macedonia, OH (Phase II)
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(C)  
Huber Hts, OH
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Lebanon, OH
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Wilmington, OH
    0       S/L 30       1977(C)  
Hillsboro, OH
    0       S/L 30       1979(C)  
Xenia, OH
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Boardman, OH
    26,581       S/L 31.5       1997(A)  
Solon, OH
    16,280       S/L 31.5       1998(C)  
Cincinnati, OH
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Bedford, IN
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Watertown, SD
    0       S/L 30       1977(C)  
Connersville, IN
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Ashland, OH
    0       S/L 30       1977(C)  

F-55


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation — (Continued)
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
                                                         
Initial Cost Total Cost (B)


Buildings & Buildings & Accumulated
Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total Depreciation







Pensacola, FL
    1,805       4,010       273       816       2,963       3,779       551  
Cleveland, OH (West 65th)
    90       1,463       15       90       1,543       1,633       1,381  
Los Alamos, NM
    725       3,500       30       725       4,771       5,496       3,103  
Waynesville, NC
    432       8,089       131       432       8,247       8,679       3,072  
Pulaski, VA
    528       6,396       2       499       6,536       7,035       2,407  
St. Louis, MO (Sunset)
    12,791       38,404       0       13,204       43,046       56,250       9,175  
St. Louis, MO (Brentwood)
    10,628       32,053       0       10,018       32,369       42,387       6,881  
Cedar Rapids, IA
    4,219       12,697       0       4,219       13,369       17,588       3,123  
St. Louis, MO (Olympic)
    2,775       8,370       0       2,775       9,633       12,408       2,382  
St. Louis, MO (Gravois)
    1,336       4,050       0       1,525       4,772       6,297       984  
St. Louis, MO (Morris)
    0       2,048       0       0       2,143       2,143       465  
St. Louis, MO (Keller)
    1,632       4,936       0       1,632       5,153       6,785       1,052  
St. Louis, MO (Southtowne)
    4,159       3,818       0       4,159       3,818       7,977       48  
Aurora, OH
    832       7,560       0       1,592       13,175       14,767       2,358  
Worthington, MN
    374       6,404       441       374       7,823       8,197       6,003  
Harrisburg, IL
    550       7,619       0       550       7,948       8,498       2,795  
Idaho Falls, ID (DDRC)
    1,302       5,703       0       1,418       5,721       7,139       1,223  
Mount Vernon, IL
    1,789       9,399       111       1,789       15,089       16,878       4,833  
Fenton, MO
    414       4,244       476       430       7,603       8,033       4,209  
Melbourne, FL
    0       3,085       117       0       3,237       3,237       2,938  
Simpsonville, SC
    431       6,563       0       417       6,790       7,207       2,413  
Camden, SC
    627       7,519       7       930       9,552       10,482       3,291  
Union, SC
    685       7,629       1       685       7,778       8,463       2,840  
N. Charleston, SC
    911       11,346       1       1,081       16,391       17,472       5,865  
S. Anderson, SC
    1,366       6,117       13       1,366       6,150       7,516       3,006  
Orangeburg, SC
    318       1,693       0       318       3,418       3,736       857  
Mt. Pleasant, SC
    2,584       10,470       0       2,430       16,239       18,669       3,966  
Sault St. Marie, MI
    1,826       13,710       0       1,826       15,075       16,901       4,805  
Cheboygan, MI
    127       3,612       0       127       3,785       3,912       1,308  
Walker, MI (Grand Rapids)
    1,926       8,039       0       1,926       8,491       10,417       2,451  
Detroit, MI
    6,738       26,988       27       6,738       29,209       35,947       6,105  
Houghton, MI
    440       7,301       1,821       440       11,771       12,211       8,383  
Bad Axe, MI
    184       3,647       0       184       4,068       4,252       1,461  
Gaylord, MI
    270       8,728       2       270       9,476       9,746       3,295  
Howell, MI
    332       11,938       1       332       12,516       12,848       4,663  
Mt. Pleasant, MI
    767       7,769       20       767       13,545       14,312       4,031  
Elyria, OH
    352       5,693       0       352       5,693       6,045       3,515  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
         
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation

Pensacola, FL
    3,228  
Cleveland, OH (West 65th)
    252  
Los Alamos, NM
    2,393  
Waynesville, NC
    5,607  
Pulaski, VA
    4,628  
St. Louis, MO (Sunset)
    47,075  
St. Louis, MO (Brentwood)
    35,506  
Cedar Rapids, IA
    14,465  
St. Louis, MO (Olympic)
    10,026  
St. Louis, MO (Gravois)
    5,313  
St. Louis, MO (Morris)
    1,678  
St. Louis, MO (Keller)
    5,733  
St. Louis, MO (Southtowne)
    7,929  
Aurora, OH
    12,409  
Worthington, MN
    2,194  
Harrisburg, IL
    5,703  
Idaho Falls, ID (DDRC)
    5,916  
Mount Vernon, IL
    12,045  
Fenton, MO
    3,824  
Melbourne, FL
    299  
Simpsonville, SC
    4,794  
Camden, SC
    7,191  
Union, SC
    5,623  
N. Charleston, SC
    11,607  
S. Anderson, SC
    4,510  
Orangeburg, SC
    2,879  
Mt. Pleasant, SC
    14,703  
Sault St. Marie, MI
    12,096  
Cheboygan, MI
    2,604  
Walker, MI (Grand Rapids)
    7,966  
Detroit, MI
    29,842  
Houghton, MI
    3,828  
Bad Axe, MI
    2,791  
Gaylord, MI
    6,451  
Howell, MI
    8,185  
Mt. Pleasant, MI
    10,281  
Elyria, OH
    2,530  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                         
Depreciable Date of
Lives Construction (C)
Encumbrances (Years) (1) Acquisition (A)



Pensacola, FL
    0       S/L 30       1988(C)  
Cleveland, OH (West 65th)
    0       S/L 30       1977(C)  
Los Alamos, NM
    0       S/L 30       1978(C)  
Waynesville, NC
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Pulaski, VA
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
St. Louis, MO (Sunset)
    34,458       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
St. Louis, MO (Brentwood)
    25,596       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Cedar Rapids, IA
    10,067       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
St. Louis, MO (Olympic)
    3,529       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
St. Louis, MO (Gravois)
    1,883       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
St. Louis, MO (Morris)
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
St. Louis, MO (Keller)
    1,619       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
St. Louis, MO (Southtowne)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(C)  
Aurora, OH
    0       S/L 31.5       1995(C)  
Worthington, MN
    0       S/L 30       1977(C)  
Harrisburg, IL
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Idaho Falls, ID (DDRC)
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Mount Vernon, IL
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Fenton, MO
    0       S/L 30       1983(A)  
Melbourne, FL
    0       S/L 30       1978(C)  
Simpsonville, SC
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Camden, SC
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Union, SC
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
N. Charleston, SC
    11,656       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
S. Anderson, SC
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Orangeburg, SC
    0       S/L 31.5       1995(A)  
Mt. Pleasant, SC
    0       S/L 31.5       1995(A)  
Sault St. Marie, MI
    2,487       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Cheboygan, MI
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Walker, MI (Grand Rapids)
    8,573       S/L 31.5       1995(A)  
Detroit, MI
    2,922       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Houghton, MI
    0       S/L 30       1980(C)  
Bad Axe, MI
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Gaylord, MI
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Howell, MI
    0       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Mt. Pleasant, MI
    7,899       S/L 31.5       1993(A)  
Elyria, OH
    0       S/L 30       1977(C)  

F-56


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation — (Continued)
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
                                                         
Initial Cost Total Cost (B)


Buildings & Buildings & Accumulated
Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total Depreciation







Meridian, ID
    24,591       31,779       0       21,669       44,657       66,326       4,150  
Midvale, UT (Ft. Union I, II, III & Wingers)
    25,662       56,759       0       23,180       53,941       77,121       11,805  
Taylorsville, UT
    24,327       53,686       0       28,698       73,796       102,494       13,634  
Orem, UT
    5,428       12,259       0       5,428       13,069       18,497       2,683  
Logan, UT
    774       1,651       0       774       1,664       2,438       346  
ST. Lake City, UT (33rd)
    986       2,132       0       986       2,137       3,123       445  
Riverdale, UT
    15,845       36,479       0       15,845       42,928       58,773       8,600  
Bemidji, MN
    442       8,229       500       442       10,697       11,139       6,976  
Salt Lake City, UT
    2,801       5,997       0       2,801       6,506       9,307       1,420  
Ogden, UT
    3,620       7,716       0       3,620       8,062       11,682       1,690  
Las Vegas, NV (Maryland)
    936       3,747       0       1,547       5,949       7,496       377  
Birmingham, AL (Eastwood)
    3,726       13,974       0       3,726       17,069       20,795       4,897  
Birmingham, Al (Brook)
    10,573       26,002       0       11,434       41,930       53,364       10,519  
Brentwood, TN
    4,981       17,703       0       4,981       19,266       24,247       2,682  
Ormond Beach, FL
    1,048       15,812       4       1,048       16,467       17,515       5,494  
Cicero, NY (Bear Rd)
    1,784       3,242       0       1,784       3,242       5,026       64  
Buffalo, NY
    2,341       8,995       0       2,341       8,995       11,336       196  
West Seneca, NY
    2,929       12,926       0       2,929       12,926       15,855       248  
N. Tonawanda, NY
    5,878       21,291       0       5,878       21,291       27,169       466  
Amherst, NY
    5,873       22,458       0       5,873       22,458       28,331       489  
Jamestown, NY
    155       4,849       0       155       4,849       5,004       107  
Hamburg, NY
    2,655       7,369       0       2,655       7,369       10,024       142  
Ithaca, NY
    9,198       42,969       0       9,198       42,969       52,167       809  
Hamburg, NY
    3,303       16,239       0       3,303       16,239       19,542       352  
Lynchburg, VA
    1,848       1,911       0       1,848       1,911       3,759       40  
Depew, NY
    5,017       16,867       0       5,017       16,867       21,884       321  
Rochester, NY
    9,323       15,757       0       9,323       15,757       25,080       350  
Niagara, NY
    894       6,699       0       894       6,699       7,593       147  
West Seneca, NY
    2,576       2,590       0       2,576       2,590       5,166       52  
Tonawanda, NY
    1,519       1,830       0       1,519       1,830       3,349       42  
Orland Park, IL
    10,430       13,081       0       10,430       13,081       23,511       251  
Florence, KY
    3,946       6,296       0       3,946       6,296       10,242       142  
Hamburg, NY
    4,071       17,142       0       4,071       17,142       21,213       372  
Tonawanda, NY
    3,061       6,887       0       3,061       6,887       9,948       135  
Hamburg, NY
    4,152       22,075       0       4,152       22,075       26,227       419  
Columbus, OH (Consumer Square)
    9,828       22,858       0       9,828       22,858       32,686       508  
Louisville, KY (Outer Loop)
    4,180       747       0       4,180       747       4,927       24  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
         
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation

Meridian, ID
    62,176  
Midvale, UT (Ft. Union I, II, III & Wingers)
    65,316  
Taylorsville, UT
    88,860  
Orem, UT
    15,814  
Logan, UT
    2,092  
ST. Lake City, UT (33rd)
    2,678  
Riverdale, UT
    50,173  
Bemidji, MN
    4,163  
Salt Lake City, UT
    7,887  
Ogden, UT
    9,992  
Las Vegas, NV (Maryland)
    7,119  
Birmingham, AL (Eastwood)
    15,898  
Birmingham, Al (Brook)
    42,845  
Brentwood, TN
    21,565  
Ormond Beach, FL
    12,021  
Cicero, NY (Bear Rd)
    4,962  
Buffalo, NY
    11,140  
West Seneca, NY
    15,607  
N. Tonawanda, NY
    26,703  
Amherst, NY
    27,842  
Jamestown, NY
    4,897  
Hamburg, NY
    9,882  
Ithaca, NY
    51,358  
Hamburg, NY
    19,190  
Lynchburg, VA
    3,719  
Depew, NY
    21,563  
Rochester, NY
    24,730  
Niagara, NY
    7,446  
West Seneca, NY
    5,114  
Tonawanda, NY
    3,307  
Orland Park, IL
    23,260  
Florence, KY
    10,100  
Hamburg, NY
    20,841  
Tonawanda, NY
    9,813  
Hamburg, NY
    25,808  
Columbus, OH (Consumer Square)
    32,178  
Louisville, KY (Outer Loop)
    4,903  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                         
Depreciable Date of
Lives Construction (C)
Encumbrances (Years) (1) Acquisition (A)



Meridian, ID
    25,527       S/L 31.5       2001(C)  
Midvale, UT (Ft. Union I, II, III & Wingers)
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Taylorsville, UT
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Orem, UT
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Logan, UT
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
ST. Lake City, UT (33rd)
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Riverdale, UT
    8,980       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Bemidji, MN
    0       S/L 30       1977(C)  
Salt Lake City, UT
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Ogden, UT
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Las Vegas, NV (Maryland)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(C)  
Birmingham, AL (Eastwood)
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Birmingham, Al (Brook)
    27,646       S/L 31.5       1995(A)  
Brentwood, TN
    0       S/L 31.5       2000(A)  
Ormond Beach, FL
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Cicero, NY (Bear Rd)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Buffalo, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
West Seneca, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
N. Tonawanda, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Amherst, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Jamestown, NY
    1,773       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Hamburg, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Ithaca, NY
    20,303       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Hamburg, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Lynchburg, VA
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Depew, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Rochester, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Niagara, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
West Seneca, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Tonawanda, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Orland Park, IL
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Florence, KY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Hamburg, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Tonawanda, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Hamburg, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Columbus, OH (Consumer Square)
    14,322       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Louisville, KY (Outer Loop)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  

F-57


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation — (Continued)
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
                                                         
Initial Cost Total Cost (B)


Buildings & Buildings & Accumulated
Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total Depreciation







Frankfurt, KY (Eastwood)
    2,307       8,546       0       2,307       8,546       10,853       191  
Tampa, FL (Horizon Park)
    12,112       11,277       0       12,112       11,277       23,389       253  
Olean, NY
    8,834       29,813       0       8,834       29,813       38,647       576  
N. Charleston SC (N Charl Ctr)
    5,146       5,990       0       5,146       5,990       11,136       142  
Jacksonville, FL (Arlington Road)
    4,672       5,085       0       4,672       5,085       9,757       120  
West Long Branch, NJ (Monmouth)
    14,131       51,982       0       14,131       51,982       66,113       980  
Big Flats, NY (Big Flats I)
    22,229       52,579       0       22,229       52,579       74,808       1,011  
Hanover, PA
    4,408       4,707       0       4,408       4,707       9,115       107  
Mays Landing, NJ (Wrangelboro)
    49,033       107,230       0       49,033       107,230       156,263       2,035  
Plattsburgh, NY
    10,734       34,028       0       10,734       34,028       44,762       660  
Niagara Falls, NY
    3,175       7,432       0       3,175       7,432       10,607       144  
Williamsville, NY
    5,021       6,768       0       5,021       6,768       11,789       130  
Niagara Falls, NY
    4,956       11,370       0       4,956       11,370       16,326       251  
Amherst, NY
    29,729       78,602       0       29,729       78,602       108,331       1,497  
Greece, NY
    3,901       4,922       0       3,901       4,922       8,823       96  
Amherst, NY
    2,618       6,157       0       2,618       6,157       8,775       117  
Buffalo, NY (Elmwood)
    6,010       19,044       0       6,010       19,044       25,054       361  
Orange Park, FL (The Village)
    1,929       5,476       0       1,929       5,476       7,405       106  
Lakeland, FL (Highlands)
    4,112       4,328       0       4,112       4,328       8,440       87  
Lockport, NY
    9,253       23,829       0       9,253       23,829       33,082       459  
Cortland, NY
    1,622       22,235       0       1,622       22,235       23,857       420  
Rochester, NY (Hen-Jef)
    7,156       7,581       0       7,156       7,581       14,737       150  
Buffalo, NY (Delaware)
    3,568       29,001       0       3,568       29,001       32,569       437  
Amherst, NY (University Plaza)
    3,909       14,134       0       3,909       14,134       18,043       271  
Cheektowaga, NY (Thruway)
    15,471       25,600       0       15,471       25,600       41,071       580  
Walker, MI (Alpine Ave)
    1,454       9,284       0       1,454       9,284       10,738       202  
Toledo, OH
    1,316       3,961       0       1,316       3,961       5,277       78  
Amherst, NY
    4,054       11,995       0       4,054       11,995       16,049       229  
Erie, PA
    2,175       13,286       0       2,175       13,286       15,461       288  
New Hartford, NY
    1,279       13,685       0       1,279       13,685       14,964       261  
Niagara Falls, NY
    2,784       3,872       0       2,784       3,872       6,656       90  
Medina, NY
    2,269       2,881       0       2,269       2,881       5,150       58  
Tonawanda, NY (Sher/ Delaware)
    5,090       14,874       0       5,090       14,874       19,964       286  
Mays Landing, NJ (Hamilton)
    36,224       56,949       0       36,224       56,949       93,173       1,078  
Gates, NY
    9,369       40,672       0       9,369       40,672       50,041       772  
Lantana, FL
    5,448       12,333       0       5,448       12,333       17,781       0  
Rome, NY (Freedom)
    4,565       5,078       0       4,565       5,078       9,643       120  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
         
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation

Frankfurt, KY (Eastwood)
    10,662  
Tampa, FL (Horizon Park)
    23,136  
Olean, NY
    38,071  
N. Charleston SC (N Charl Ctr)
    10,994  
Jacksonville, FL (Arlington Road)
    9,637  
West Long Branch, NJ (Monmouth)
    65,133  
Big Flats, NY (Big Flats I)
    73,797  
Hanover, PA
    9,008  
Mays Landing, NJ (Wrangelboro)
    154,228  
Plattsburgh, NY
    44,102  
Niagara Falls, NY
    10,463  
Williamsville, NY
    11,659  
Niagara Falls, NY
    16,075  
Amherst, NY
    106,834  
Greece, NY
    8,727  
Amherst, NY
    8,658  
Buffalo, NY (Elmwood)
    24,693  
Orange Park, FL (The Village)
    7,299  
Lakeland, FL (Highlands)
    8,353  
Lockport, NY
    32,623  
Cortland, NY
    23,437  
Rochester, NY (Hen-Jef)
    14,587  
Buffalo, NY (Delaware)
    32,132  
Amherst, NY (University Plaza)
    17,772  
Cheektowaga, NY (Thruway)
    40,491  
Walker, MI (Alpine Ave)
    10,536  
Toledo, OH
    5,199  
Amherst, NY
    15,820  
Erie, PA
    15,173  
New Hartford, NY
    14,703  
Niagara Falls, NY
    6,566  
Medina, NY
    5,092  
Tonawanda, NY (Sher/ Delaware)
    19,678  
Mays Landing, NJ (Hamilton)
    92,095  
Gates, NY
    49,269  
Lantana, FL
    17,781  
Rome, NY (Freedom)
    9,523  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                         
Depreciable Date of
Lives Construction (C)
Encumbrances (Years) (1) Acquisition (A)



Frankfurt, KY (Eastwood)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Tampa, FL (Horizon Park)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Olean, NY
    5,034       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
N. Charleston SC (N Charl Ctr)
    10,831       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Jacksonville, FL (Arlington Road)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
West Long Branch, NJ (Monmouth)
    15,394       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Big Flats, NY (Big Flats I)
    17,683       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Hanover, PA
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Mays Landing, NJ (Wrangelboro)
    52,174       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Plattsburgh, NY
    11,489       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Niagara Falls, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Williamsville, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Niagara Falls, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Amherst, NY
    27,648       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Greece, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Amherst, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Buffalo, NY (Elmwood)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Orange Park, FL (The Village)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Lakeland, FL (Highlands)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Lockport, NY
    13,767       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Cortland, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Rochester, NY (Hen-Jef)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Buffalo, NY (Delaware)
    1,254       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Amherst, NY (University Plaza)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Cheektowaga, NY (Thruway)
    5,238       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Walker, MI (Alpine Ave)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Toledo, OH
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Amherst, NY
    5,516       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Erie, PA
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
New Hartford, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Niagara Falls, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Medina, NY
    4,092       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Tonawanda, NY (Sher/ Delaware)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Mays Landing, NJ (Hamilton)
    16,562       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Gates, NY
    25,039       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Lantana, FL
    4,828       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Rome, NY (Freedom)
    4,703       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  

F-58


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation — (Continued)
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
                                                         
Initial Cost Total Cost (B)


Buildings & Buildings & Accumulated
Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total Depreciation







Englewood, FL
    2,172       2,983       0       2,172       2,983       5,155       8  
Utica, NY
    2,869       14,621       0       2,869       14,621       17,490       282  
Hamburg, NY (Milestrip)
    2,527       14,711       0       2,527       14,711       17,238       318  
Mooresville, NC
    14,633       34,373       0       14,633       34,373       49,006       663  
Alden, NY
    4,547       3,926       0       4,547       3,926       8,473       77  
Amherst, NY (Sheridan/ Harlem)
    2,620       2,554       0       2,620       2,554       5,174       58  
Indian Trail, NC
    3,172       7,075       0       3,172       7,075       10,247       136  
Dewitt, NY
    1,140       6,756       0       1,140       6,756       7,896       128  
Chili, NY
    2,143       8,109       0       2,143       8,109       10,252       157  
Ashtabula, OH
    1,444       9,912       0       1,444       9,912       11,356       187  
Irondequoit, NY (Ridgeview)
    4,163       2,502       0       4,163       2,502       6,665       50  
Springville, NY
    1,454       9,835       0       1,454       9,835       11,289       188  
Niskayuna, NY
    20,297       51,155       0       20,297       51,155       71,452       971  
Dansville, NY
    2,806       4,905       0       2,806       4,905       7,711       95  
Canandaigua, NY
    5,132       5,073       0       5,132       5,073       10,205       14  
Dewitt, NY (Dewitt Commons)
    9,738       26,351       0       9,738       26,351       36,089       578  
Victor, NY
    2,374       6,433       0       2,374       6,433       8,807       87  
Alamosa, CO
    161       1,034       211       161       1,227       1,388       840  
Wilmington, NC
    4,785       16,852       1,183       4,287       30,746       35,033       10,252  
Berlin, VT
    859       10,948       24       866       13,818       14,684       6,857  
Brainerd, MN
    703       9,104       272       1,182       13,987       15,169       5,252  
Spring Hill, FL
    1,084       4,816       266       2,096       10,858       12,954       3,654  
Tiffin, OH
    432       5,908       435       432       9,249       9,681       4,002  
Broomfield, CO (Flatiron Gard)
    23,681       31,809       0       13,841       42,540       56,381       1,408  
Denver, CO (Centennial)
    7,833       35,550       0       7,833       51,744       59,577       10,947  
Dickinson, ND
    57       6,864       355       51       7,768       7,819       6,858  
West Pasco, FL
    1,422       6,552       9       1,358       6,490       7,848       3,917  
Marianna, FL
    1,496       3,500       130       1,496       3,665       5,161       1,684  
Hutchinson, MN
    402       5,510       657       427       6,758       7,185       5,149  
New Bern, NC
    780       8,204       72       441       5,181       5,622       2,068  
Princeton, NJ
    7,121       29,783       0       7,121       34,391       41,512       6,885  
Princeton, NJ (Pavilion)
    6,327       44,466       0       6,327       44,702       51,029       5,877  
Ft. Worth, TX (Fossil Creek)
    4,330       4,900       0       4,424       5,010       9,434       430  
Wichita, KS (Eastgate)
    5,058       11,362       0       5,222       11,755       16,977       1,026  
Russellville, AR
    624       13,391       0       624       13,694       14,318       4,641  
N. Little Rock, AR
    907       17,160       0       907       18,829       19,736       4,807  
Ottumwa, IA
    338       8,564       103       321       16,103       16,424       4,807  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
         
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation

Englewood, FL
    5,147  
Utica, NY
    17,208  
Hamburg, NY (Milestrip)
    16,920  
Mooresville, NC
    48,343  
Alden, NY
    8,396  
Amherst, NY (Sheridan/ Harlem)
    5,116  
Indian Trail, NC
    10,111  
Dewitt, NY
    7,768  
Chili, NY
    10,095  
Ashtabula, OH
    11,169  
Irondequoit, NY (Ridgeview)
    6,615  
Springville, NY
    11,101  
Niskayuna, NY
    70,481  
Dansville, NY
    7,616  
Canandaigua, NY
    10,191  
Dewitt, NY (Dewitt Commons)
    35,511  
Victor, NY
    8,720  
Alamosa, CO
    548  
Wilmington, NC
    24,781  
Berlin, VT
    7,827  
Brainerd, MN
    9,917  
Spring Hill, FL
    9,300  
Tiffin, OH
    5,679  
Broomfield, CO (Flatiron Gard)
    54,973  
Denver, CO (Centennial)
    48,630  
Dickinson, ND
    961  
West Pasco, FL
    3,931  
Marianna, FL
    3,477  
Hutchinson, MN
    2,036  
New Bern, NC
    3,554  
Princeton, NJ
    34,627  
Princeton, NJ (Pavilion)
    45,152  
Ft. Worth, TX (Fossil Creek)
    9,004  
Wichita, KS (Eastgate)
    15,951  
Russellville, AR
    9,677  
N. Little Rock, AR
    14,929  
Ottumwa, IA
    11,617  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                         
Depreciable Date of
Lives Construction (C)
Encumbrances (Years) (1) Acquisition (A)



Englewood, FL
    2,255       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Utica, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Hamburg, NY (Milestrip)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Mooresville, NC
    24,032       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Alden, NY
    4,563       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Amherst, NY (Sheridan/ Harlem)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Indian Trail, NC
    7,002       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Dewitt, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Chili, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Ashtabula, OH
    6,969       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Irondequoit, NY (Ridgeview)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Springville, NY
    6,492       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Niskayuna, NY
    26,310       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Dansville, NY
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Canandaigua, NY
    6,087       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Dewitt, NY (Dewitt Commons)
    0       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Victor, NY
    6,689       S/L 31.5       2004(A)  
Alamosa, CO
    0       S/L 30       1986(C)  
Wilmington, NC
    21,192       S/L 31.5       1989(C)  
Berlin, VT
    4,940       S/L 30       1986(C)  
Brainerd, MN
    75       S/L 31.5       1991(A)  
Spring Hill, FL
    5,312       S/L 30       1988(C)  
Tiffin, OH
    0       S/L 30       1980(C)  
Broomfield, CO (Flatiron Gard)
    0       S/L 31.5       2003(A)  
Denver, CO (Centennial)
    38,395       S/L 31.5       1997(C)  
Dickinson, ND
    0       S/L 30       1978(C)  
West Pasco, FL
    4,784       S/L 30       1986(C)  
Marianna, FL
    0       S/L 31.5       1990(C)  
Hutchinson, MN
    0       S/L 30       1981(C)  
New Bern, NC
    0       S/L 31.5       1989(C)  
Princeton, NJ
    26,057       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Princeton, NJ (Pavilion)
    24,998       S/L 31.5       2000(C)  
Ft. Worth, TX (Fossil Creek)
    0       S/L 31.5       2002(A)  
Wichita, KS (Eastgate)
    0       S/L 31.5       2002(A)  
Russellville, AR
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
N. Little Rock, AR
    0       S/L 31.5       1994(A)  
Ottumwa, IA
    0       S/L 31.5       1990(C)  

F-59


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation — (Continued)
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
                                                         
Initial Cost Total Cost (B)


Buildings & Buildings & Accumulated
Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total Depreciation







Washington, NC
    991       3,118       34       878       4,399       5,277       1,702  
Leawood, KS
    13,002       69,086       0       13,002       69,802       82,804       3,978  
Littleton, CO
    12,249       50,709       0       12,249       50,709       62,958       3,530  
Durham, NC
    2,210       11,671       278       2,210       13,280       15,490       6,086  
San Antonio, TX (N. Bandera)
    3,475       37,327       0       3,475       37,366       40,841       2,993  
Crystal River, FL
    1,217       5,796       365       1,219       7,641       8,860       4,049  
Bellefontaine, OH
    998       3,221       0       998       5,544       6,542       1,030  
Dublin, OH (Perimeter Center)
    3,609       11,546       0       3,609       11,740       15,349       2,587  
Hamilton, OH
    495       1,618       0       495       1,618       2,113       346  
Pataskala, OH
    514       1,679       0       514       1,707       2,221       361  
Pickerington, OH
    1,896       6,086       0       1,896       6,332       8,228       1,318  
Barboursville, WV
    431       1,417       2       431       1,631       2,062       309  
Columbus, OH (Easton Market)
    11,087       44,494       0       11,866       47,823       59,689       9,887  
Irving, TX
    632       3,432       0       631       3,638       4,269       462  
Houston, TX (Commerce Park)
    668       3,683       0       668       3,746       4,414       449  
Irving, TX (Gateway-5)
    687       4,029       0       686       4,290       4,976       610  
Arlington, TX (Meridian Street)
    322       1,311       0       322       1,313       1,635       150  
Dallas, TX (Northgate)
    1,160       5,907       0       1,158       6,109       7,267       799  
Houston, TX (Plaza Southwest)
    919       4,800       0       918       5,139       6,057       722  
Houston, TX (Westchase Park)
    432       2,156       0       431       2,356       2,787       294  
Menomenee Falls, WI (Northwest)
    872       4,328       0       871       4,425       5,296       518  
Denver, CO (Tamarac Square Mall)
    2,990       12,252       0       2,987       13,506       16,493       1,941  
Dallas, TX (Carpenter Center)
    529       1,239       0       529       1,288       1,817       171  
Grand Prairie, TX (Carrier Place)
    585       3,126       0       585       3,524       4,109       335  
Grapevine, TX (DFW North)
    395       3,089       0       395       3,269       3,664       474  
Dallas, TX (Northgate)
    1,179       9,833       0       1,178       10,441       11,619       1,221  
Plano, TX (Parkway Tech Center)
    482       3,366       0       482       3,644       4,126       452  
Dallas, TX (Shady Trail Business)
    529       1,890       0       529       1,980       2,509       242  
Dallas, TX (Valley View Commerce)
    1,795       5,028       0       1,793       6,119       7,912       932  
Carrollton, TX (Valwood)
    356       1,996       0       355       2,043       2,398       241  
Houston, TX (Commerce Center)
    4,624       8,423       0       4,619       9,439       14,058       1,321  
Chelmsford, MA (Apollo Drive)
    8,124       26,760       0       8,116       26,813       34,929       3,045  
St. Louis, MO (1881 Pine Street)
    827       7,485       0       827       7,862       8,689       1,156  
Phoenix, AZ (Gateway West)
    2,107       10,104       0       2,105       10,414       12,519       1,229  
Daytona Beach, FL (Volusia Point)
    3,838       4,485       0       3,834       4,586       8,420       541  
Norfolk, VA (Norfolk Commerce)
    2,293       19,493       0       2,291       20,916       23,207       2,730  
Twinsburg, OH (Heritage Business)
    254       1,623       0       254       1,625       1,879       185  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
         
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation

Washington, NC
    3,575  
Leawood, KS
    78,826  
Littleton, CO
    59,428  
Durham, NC
    9,404  
San Antonio, TX (N. Bandera)
    37,848  
Crystal River, FL
    4,811  
Bellefontaine, OH
    5,512  
Dublin, OH (Perimeter Center)
    12,762  
Hamilton, OH
    1,767  
Pataskala, OH
    1,860  
Pickerington, OH
    6,910  
Barboursville, WV
    1,753  
Columbus, OH (Easton Market)
    49,802  
Irving, TX
    3,807  
Houston, TX (Commerce Park)
    3,965  
Irving, TX (Gateway-5)
    4,366  
Arlington, TX (Meridian Street)
    1,485  
Dallas, TX (Northgate)
    6,468  
Houston, TX (Plaza Southwest)
    5,335  
Houston, TX (Westchase Park)
    2,493  
Menomenee Falls, WI (Northwest)
    4,778  
Denver, CO (Tamarac Square Mall)
    14,552  
Dallas, TX (Carpenter Center)
    1,646  
Grand Prairie, TX (Carrier Place)
    3,774  
Grapevine, TX (DFW North)
    3,190  
Dallas, TX (Northgate)
    10,398  
Plano, TX (Parkway Tech Center)
    3,674  
Dallas, TX (Shady Trail Business)
    2,267  
Dallas, TX (Valley View Commerce)
    6,980  
Carrollton, TX (Valwood)
    2,157  
Houston, TX (Commerce Center)
    12,737  
Chelmsford, MA (Apollo Drive)
    31,884  
St. Louis, MO (1881 Pine Street)
    7,533  
Phoenix, AZ (Gateway West)
    11,290  
Daytona Beach, FL (Volusia Point)
    7,879  
Norfolk, VA (Norfolk Commerce)
    20,477  
Twinsburg, OH (Heritage Business)
    1,694  

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                         
Depreciable Date of
Lives Construction (C)
Encumbrances (Years) (1) Acquisition (A)



Washington, NC
    0       S/L 31.5       1990(C)  
Leawood, KS
    51,435       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Littleton, CO
    0       S/L 31.5       2002(C)  
Durham, NC
    7,225       S/L 31.5       1990(C)  
San Antonio, TX (N. Bandera)
    25,000       S/L 31.5       2002(A)  
Crystal River, FL
    0       S/L 31.5       1986(C)  
Bellefontaine, OH
    2,481       S/L 30       1998(A)  
Dublin, OH (Perimeter Center)
    9,455       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Hamilton, OH
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Pataskala, OH
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Pickerington, OH
    4,298       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Barboursville, WV
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Columbus, OH (Easton Market)
    0       S/L 31.5       1998(A)  
Irving, TX
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Houston, TX (Commerce Park)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Irving, TX (Gateway-5)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Arlington, TX (Meridian Street)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Dallas, TX (Northgate)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Houston, TX (Plaza Southwest)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Houston, TX (Westchase Park)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Menomenee Falls, WI (Northwest)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Denver, CO (Tamarac Square Mall)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Dallas, TX (Carpenter Center)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Grand Prairie, TX (Carrier Place)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Grapevine, TX (DFW North)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Dallas, TX (Northgate)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Plano, TX (Parkway Tech Center)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Dallas, TX (Shady Trail Business)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Dallas, TX (Valley View Commerce)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Carrollton, TX (Valwood)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Houston, TX (Commerce Center)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Chelmsford, MA (Apollo Drive)
    27,985       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
St. Louis, MO (1881 Pine Street)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Phoenix, AZ (Gateway West)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Daytona Beach, FL (Volusia Point)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Norfolk, VA (Norfolk Commerce)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Twinsburg, OH (Heritage Business)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  

F-60


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation — (Continued)
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)
                                                         
Initial Cost Total Cost (B)


Buildings & Buildings & Accumulated
Land Improvements Improvements Land Improvements Total Depreciation







Houston, TX (Technipark Ten)
    873       3,141       0       872       3,296       4,168       417  
Phoenix, AZ (Washington Business)
    2,022       7,456       0       2,020       7,641       9,661       912  
Chesapeake, VA (Greenbrier Circle)
    1,878       14,039       0       1,876       15,273       17,149       1,752  
Chesapeake, VA (Greenbrier Tech)
    965       5,898       0       964       6,446       7,410       820  
Silver Springs, MD (Tech Center 29-1)
    7,484       20,980       0       7,476       22,756       30,232       2,682  
Orlando, FL (Winter Park)
    2,017       8,207       0       2,014       8,436       10,450       1,148  
Portfolio Balance (DDR)
    136,760       303,861       0       136,760       303,861       440,621       10,460  
 
    $ 1,375,515     $ 3,916,364     $ 10,173     $ 1,346,625     $ 4,256,799     $ 5,603,424     $ 568,231  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
         
Total Cost,
Net of
Accumulated
Depreciation

Houston, TX (Technipark Ten)
    3,751  
Phoenix, AZ (Washington Business)
    8,749  
Chesapeake, VA (Greenbrier Circle)
    15,397  
Chesapeake, VA (Greenbrier Tech)
    6,590  
Silver Springs, MD (Tech Center 29-1)
    27,550  
Orlando, FL (Winter Park)
    9,302  
Portfolio Balance (DDR)
    430,161  
    $ 5,035,193  
     
 

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
                         
Depreciable Date of
Lives Construction (C)
Encumbrances (Years) (1) Acquisition (A)



Houston, TX (Technipark Ten)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Phoenix, AZ (Washington Business)
    0       S/L 30       2001(A)  
Chesapeake, VA (Greenbrier Circle)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Chesapeake, VA (Greenbrier Tech)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Silver Springs, MD (Tech Center 29-1)
    10,349       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Orlando, FL (Winter Park)
    0       S/L 31.5       2001(A)  
Portfolio Balance (DDR)
    56,185       S/L 31.5          
    $ 1,072,779                  
     
                 


(1)  S/ L refers to straight-line depreciation

(B)  The Aggregate Cost for Federal Income Tax purposes was approximately $5.5 billion at December 31, 2004.

F-61


Table of Contents

Developers Diversified Realty Corporation
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation — (Continued)
December 31, 2004
(In thousands)

     The changes in Total Real Estate Assets for the three years ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                         
2004 2003 2002



Balance, beginning of year
  $ 3,884,911     $ 2,804,056     $ 2,493,665  
Acquisitions and transfers from joint ventures
    2,170,793       1,363,636       298,592  
Developments, improvements and expansions
    243,929       20,081       95,146  
Changes in land under development and construction in progress
    (7,011 )     119,485       (11,121 )
Sales, retirements and transfers to joint ventures
    (689,198 )     (422,347 )     (72,225 )
     
     
     
 
Balance, end of year
  $ 5,603,424     $ 3,884,911     $ 2,804,057  
     
     
     
 

      The changes in Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization for the three years ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                         
2004 2003 2002



Balance, beginning of year
  $ 458,213     $ 408,792     $ 351,709  
Depreciation for year
    132,647       95,219       76,658  
Sales and retirements
    (22,629 )     (45,797 )     (19,575 )
     
     
     
 
Balance, end of year
    568,231       458,214       408,792  
     
     
     
 

F-62


Table of Contents

(DEVELOPERS DIVERSIFIED REALTY LOGO)