Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20459

FORM 10-K

     
[X]
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004
 
   
OR
 
   
[   ]
 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the transition period from                     to                    

Commission File Number 0-288

ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Ohio   31-0424220

 
 
 
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. employer
incorporation)   identification number)
     
1400 Kettering Tower, Dayton, Ohio   45423

 
 
 
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(937) 222-2610


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
    Name of each exchange on
Title of each class
  which registered
(1) Common Shares, without par value
  New York
 
   
(2) 8.00 % Convertible Subordinated Notes, Due 2008
  New York

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:    None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for at least the past 90 days.       Yes [x]   No [  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).       Yes [x]   No [  ]

 


Table of Contents

         
Number of Common Shares, without par value, outstanding at October 15, 2004
    14,530,289  
 
       
Aggregate market value of Common Shares, without par value, held by non-affiliates of the Company at February 29, 2004 (the last business day of the Company’s second fiscal quarter)
  $ 229,397,901  

DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Robbins & Myers, Inc., Proxy Statement, dated November 8, 2004, for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 8, 2004; definitive copies of the foregoing have been filed with the Commission. Only such portions of the Proxy Statement as are specifically incorporated by reference under Part III of this Report shall be deemed filed as part of this Report.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY STATEMENT
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
SIGNATURES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EX-21.1 List of Subsidiaries
EX-23.1 Consent
EX-24.1 Power of Attorney
EX-31.1 Certification
EX-31.2 Certification
EX-32.1 Certification
EX-32.2 Certification


Table of Contents

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

OVERVIEW

Robbins & Myers, Inc. is an Ohio corporation. As used in this report, the terms “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” mean Robbins & Myers, Inc. and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates another meaning. We are a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of highly engineered, application-critical equipment and systems for the pharmaceutical, energy and industrial markets worldwide. Our principal brand names – Pfaudler®, Moyno®, Chemineer®, Laetus®, FrymaKoruma®, Siebler®, Hapa® and Hercules® – hold the number one or two market share position in the niche markets they serve. We attribute our success to our close and continuing interaction with customers, our manufacturing, sourcing and application engineering expertise and our ability to serve customers globally. Our fiscal 2004 sales were approximately $586 million, and no one customer accounted for more than 5% of these sales.

Our business consists of three market-focused segments: Pharmaceutical, Energy and Industrial.

Pharmaceutical. Our Pharmaceutical business segment includes our Reactor Systems and Romaco businesses and is focused primarily on the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries. Our Reactor Systems business designs, manufacturers and markets primary processing equipment and engineered systems and we believe has the leading worldwide position in glass-lined reactors and storage vessels. Our Romaco business designs, manufacturers and markets secondary processing, dosing, filling, printing and security equipment. Several of our Romaco brands hold the number one or two worldwide position in the niche markets they serve. Major customers of our pharmaceutical segment include Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis and Pfizer.

Energy. Our Energy business segment designs, manufactures and markets equipment and systems used in oil and gas exploration and recovery. Our equipment and systems include hydraulic drilling power sections, down-hole pumps and a broad line of ancillary equipment, such as rod guides, rod and tubing rotators, wellhead systems, pipeline closure products and valves. These products and systems are used at the wellhead and in subsurface drilling and production. Several of our energy products, including hydraulic drilling power sections and down-hole pumps, hold the number one or two worldwide position in their respective markets. Major customers of our energy segment include Schlumberger and Chevron Texaco.

Industrial. Our Industrial business segment is comprised of our Moyno, Tarby, Chemineer and Edlon businesses, which design, manufacture and market products that are used in specialty chemical, wastewater treatment and a variety of other industrial applications. Our Moyno and Tarby businesses manufacture pumps that utilize progressing cavity technology to provide fluids-handling solutions for a wide range of applications involving the flow of viscous, abrasive and solid-laden slurries and sludges. Our Chemineer business manufactures high-quality standard and customized fluid-agitation equipment and systems. Our Edlon business manufactures customized fluoropolymer-lined pipe, fittings, vessels and accessories. Our industrial segment has a highly diversified customer base and sells its products to over 3,500 customers worldwide.

Information concerning our sales, income before interest and income taxes (“EBIT”), identifiable assets by segment, and sales and identifiable assets by geographic area for the years ended August 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 is set forth in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included at Item 8 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Pharmaceutical Business Segment

Our Pharmaceutical business segment, which includes our Reactor Systems and Romaco businesses, primarily serves the pharmaceutical, healthcare, nutriceutical and fine chemicals markets. We believe that long term our Pharmaceutical business segment will benefit from high levels of capital expenditures within these industries. We expect the need for new and enhanced processing equipment will be driven by numerous factors, including the accelerating pace of the drug discovery process, the cost advantages of pharmaceuticals over alternative forms of treatment, the aging of the population, the increasing availability of generic drugs due to the expiration of patents, the impact of increasing direct-to-consumer advertising by pharmaceutical manufacturers, the growing demand for nutriceutical products and escalating healthcare expenditures in emerging markets.

1


Table of Contents

Reactor Systems

Our Reactor Systems business, which includes our Pfaudler and TyconTechnoglass brands, designs, manufactures and markets glass-lined reactor and storage vessels, engineered systems, mixing systems and accessories, including instrumentation and piping. This equipment is principally used in the primary processing of pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals. A reactor system performs critical functions in batch processing by providing a pressure- and temperature-controlled agitation environment for the often complex chemical reactions necessary to process pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals.

To produce a reactor, we fabricate a specialized steel vessel, which may include an outer jacket for a heating and cooling system, and line the vessel with glass by bonding the glass to the inside steel surface. Application-specific glasses are bonded with the inner steel surface of the vessel to provide an inert and corrosion-resistant surface.

Our Reactor Systems business sells reactor vessels with capacities up to 15,000 gallons, which are generally both custom ordered and designed, and are often equipped with accessories, such as drives, glass-lined agitators and baffles. We also sell these vessels as part of an engineered system. Using our application engineering expertise and our understanding of our customers’ requirements, we are able to engineer and produce a complete modular system, which may be installed at the customer’s facility or delivered to the customer as a skid-mounted system. Additionally, we manufacture and sell glass-lined storage vessels with capacities up to 25,000 gallons, primarily to the same customers that use glass-lined reactor systems.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution. We primarily market and sell Pfaudler and TyconTechnoglass equipment and systems through our direct sales force, which includes approximately 10 direct sales employees in the U.S. and 20 outside the U.S., who are supported by numerous other personnel including our application engineers. We also use approximately 30 manufacturers’ representatives in the marketing of reactor systems equipment. We are focused on continuing to develop preferred supplier relationships with major pharmaceutical companies as they continue to expand their production operations in emerging markets and seek to limit the number of suppliers that service their needs worldwide.

Aftermarket Sales. Aftermarket products and services, which include field service, replacement parts, accessories and reconditioning of glass-lined vessels, are an important part of our Reactor Systems business. Glass-lined vessels require regular maintenance and care because they are subjected to harsh operating conditions, and there is often a need to maintain a high-purity processing environment. Our aftermarket capabilities take advantage of our large installed base of Pfaudler glass-lined vessels and meet the needs of our customers, who are increasingly inclined to outsource various maintenance and service functions.

We service our own and competitors’ equipment from our various facilities and have two units dedicated to serving the aftermarket – Glasteel Parts and Service (GPS) and Chemical Reactor Services (CRS). GPS and CRS are the leading providers of aftermarket services for glass-lined equipment in the U.S. and in Europe, respectively. Through our joint venture, Universal Glasteel Equipment, we refurbish and sell used, glass-lined vessels.

Markets and Competition. We believe we have the number one worldwide market position in glass-lined reactors and storage vessels, representing a global market share in excess of 50%. Our Pfaudler brand has the leading market share in glass-lined reactors and vessels, as well as the largest installed base in most of the countries in which Pfaudler operates, including Germany, Mexico, Brazil, India, Scotland and the U.S. Our TyconTechnoglass brand has the leading market share in Italy and significant project business globally. Our Pfaudler and TyconTechnoglass brands compete principally with DeDeitrich, a French company, in all world markets except Japan, China and India.

Romaco

Romaco designs, manufactures and markets secondary processing, dosing, filling, printing and security equipment used by the pharmaceutical, healthcare, nutriceutical and cosmetics industries. The principal brand names in our Romaco business are Laetus, FrymaKoruma, Hapa and Siebler.

Romaco equipment and systems are used in:

  secondary processing of pharmaceuticals and cosmetic liquids, solids, creams and powders;

2


Table of Contents

  dosing, filling and sealing of vials, capsules, tubes, bottles and blisters; as well as customized packaging; and

  high quality and high security on demand printing lines and robust, reliable packaging inspection systems.

Romaco’s expertise extends from secondary processing through the final packaging of pharmaceuticals, nutriceuticals and cosmetics. For example, Romaco provides modular processing, dosing and filling systems, which can include equipment for the in-line labeling of drugs and the printing of dispensing packages. Romaco’s application engineers work closely with customers to design specific equipment and systems to meet their requirements.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution. We distribute Romaco products through our distribution network, which currently includes 17 sales and service centers around the world. In the geographic areas served by these centers, we sell directly to end users through our own sales force. We use manufacturers’ representatives to cover territories that are not effectively covered by our direct sales network.

Aftermarket Sales. Aftermarket sales of our Romaco business were approximately $51 million in fiscal 2004, or 29% of Romaco’s total sales. Included in these aftermarket sales are certain proprietary consumables, such as inks and labels.

Markets and Competition. Romaco has a large installed base of equipment in Europe, where it has its greatest market share, and a smaller presence in the U.S. and Asia. We believe there are opportunities in the U.S. and Asia to effectively introduce Romaco products to customers in these markets. We believe Romaco is one of the top three worldwide manufacturers of the type of pharmaceutical equipment it provides; however, the market is fragmented with many competitors, none of which is dominant. Given the fragmented nature of the industry, we believe there are strategic opportunities to expand our market share through acquisitions of companies and particular product lines.

Energy Business Segment

Our energy business designs, manufactures and markets a variety of specialized equipment and systems used in oil and gas exploration and recovery. Our equipment and systems are used at the wellhead and in subsurface drilling and production and include:

  hydraulic drilling power sections and down-hole progressing cavity pumps, which we market under our Moyno brand name;

  tubing wear prevention equipment, such as rod guides and rod and tubing rotators;

  a broad line of ancillary equipment used at the wellhead; and

  pipeline closure products and valves, which we market under our Yale, Hercules and Sentry brand names.

Hydraulic drilling power sections are used to drive the drill bit in horizontal and directional drilling applications, often drilling multiple wells from a single location. Down-hole pumps are used primarily to lift crude oil to the surface where there is insufficient natural pressure and for dewatering gas wells. The largest oil and natural gas recovery markets that benefit from using down-hole pumps are in Canada, the U.S., Venezuela, Indonesia and Kazakhstan. Rod guides are placed on down-hole rods used to pump oil to protect the rods and the production tubing from damage during operation and to enhance the flow of fluid to the surface. Tubing rotator products are an effective way of evenly distributing down-hole tubing wear. Wellhead products are used at the wellhead to control the flow of oil, gas and other material from the well. Pipeline closure products are used in oil and gas pipelines to allow access to a pipeline at selected intervals for inspection and cleaning. Principal brands of our energy segment include Moyno, Yale and Hercules.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution. We sell our hydraulic drilling power sections directly to oilfield service companies through our sales office near Houston, Texas. We sell our tubing wear prevention products and certain wellhead equipment in the U.S. and Canada through major national distributors and our service centers in key

3


Table of Contents

oilfield locations. We currently operate seven service centers in the U.S. and six service centers in Alberta, Canada. We sell down-hole pumps in the U.S. through three distributors; in Canada and Venezuela through our service centers; and in Asia through several distributors. We sell wellhead and closure products through distributor networks in the U.S. and Canada.

Aftermarket Sales. Aftermarket sales in our energy business consist principally of the relining of stators and the refurbishment of rotors. However, replacement items, such as power sections and down-hole pump rotors and rod guides, which wear out after regular usage, are complete products and are not identifiable by us as aftermarket sales.

Markets and Competition. Our energy business is a leading manufacturer of hydraulic drilling power sections worldwide. We are also the leading manufacturer of rod guides, wellhead components and pipeline closure products and the second leading manufacturer of down-hole progressing cavity pumps. While the oil and gas exploration and recovery equipment marketplace is highly fragmented, we believe that, with our leading products, we are effectively positioned as a full-line supplier with the capability to provide customers with complete system sourcing.

Oil and gas service companies use the most advanced technologies available in the exploration and recovery of oil and gas. Accordingly, new product innovation is critical to our business. We continually develop new elastomer compounds, as well as new stator manufacturing technologies, for use in power sections and down-hole pumps that allow drilling and recovery operations to be conducted in deeper formations and under more adverse conditions. We are also focused on innovations that reduce downtime in drilling and production activities for end-users of our equipment who incur high costs for any downtime. In addition, we regularly introduce new wellhead equipment and rod guide designs and materials to improve the efficiency of well production.

Industrial Business Segment

Our industrial business segment is comprised of our Moyno, Tarby, Chemineer and Edlon businesses, which design, manufacture and market products that are used in specialty chemical, wastewater treatment and a variety of other industrial applications. Our industrial businesses have strong brand names and market share and maintain strict operating discipline.

Moyno and Tarby

Our Moyno and Tarby businesses design, manufacture and market progressing cavity pumps and related products for use in the wastewater treatment, specialty chemical, food and beverage, pulp and paper and general industrial markets. Prices range from several hundred dollars for small pumps to $200,000 for large pumps, such as those used in wastewater treatment applications.

Progressing cavity technology utilizes a motor-driven, high-strength, single or multi-helix rotor within an elastomer-lined stator. The spaces between the helixes create continual cavities, which enable the fluid to move from the suction end to the discharge end. The continuous seal creates positive displacement and an even flow regardless of the speed of the application. Progressing cavity pumps are versatile as they can be positioned at any angle and can deliver flow in either direction without modification or accessories. Since progressing cavity pumps have no valves, they are able to efficiently handle fluids ranging from high-pressure water and shear-sensitive materials to heavy, viscous, abrasive and solid-laden slurries and sludges in municipal wastewater treatment operations.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution. We sell our pumps through approximately 35 U.S. and 30 non-U.S. distributors and approximately 25 U.S. and 15 non-U.S. manufacturers’ representatives. These networks are managed by five regional sales offices in the U.S. and offices in the U.K., Mexico, China and Singapore.

Markets and Competition. Moyno has a large installed base and a dominant market share in progressing cavity pumps in the U.S. and a smaller presence in Europe and Asia. While we believe Moyno is the U.S. leader in the manufacture of progressing cavity pumps, the worldwide market is highly competitive and includes several competitors, none of which is dominant. In addition, there are several other types of positive displacement pumps, including gear, lobe and air-operated diaphragm pumps that compete with progressing cavity pumps in certain applications.

4


Table of Contents

Chemineer

Chemineer manufactures industrial mixers that range in price from hundreds of dollars for small portable mixers to over $1 million for large, customized mixers. These products include top-entry, side-entry, gear-driven, belt-driven, high-shear and static mixers, which are marketed under the Chemineer, Greerco, Kenics and Prochem brand names for various industrial applications, ranging from simple storage tank agitation to critical applications in polymerization and fermentation processes.

Chemineer’s high-quality gear-driven agitators are available in various sizes, a wide selection of mounting methods and drives of up to 1,000 horsepower. Chemineer competes in the small-mixer market with DT small mixers, a line of fixed mounted mixers with drive ranges from one-half to five horsepower for less demanding applications, and the Chemineer XPress portable mixers, a line of portable gear-driven and direct-drive mixers, which can be clamp mounted to handle small-batch mixing needs.

Our belt-driven, side-entry mixers are used primarily in the pulp and paper and mineral processing industries. Our static mixers are continuous mixing and processing devices with no moving parts, and are used in specialized mixing and heat transfer applications. Our high-shear mixers are used primarily for paint, cosmetics, plastics and adhesive applications.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution. Chemineer sells industrial mixers through regional sales offices and through a network of approximately 30 U.S. and 30 non-U.S. manufacturers’ representatives. Our Chemineer business maintains regional sales offices in Mexico, Canada, the U.K., Singapore, China and Korea.

Markets and Competition. The mixer equipment industry is highly competitive. We believe that Lightnin’, a unit of SPX Corporation, holds more than 50% of the world market share, and that we hold the number two market position worldwide. In addition, there are numerous smaller manufacturers with whom we compete. We believe that Chemineer’s application engineering expertise, diverse products, product quality and customer support capabilities allow us to compete effectively in the marketplace.

Edlon

Edlon manufactures and markets fluoropolymer-lined pipe and fittings, fluoropolymer coated and lined vessels for process equipment, fluoropolymer roll covers for paper machines and glass-lined reactor systems accessories. Edlon’s products are used principally in the specialty chemical, pharmaceutical and semiconductor markets to provide corrosion protection and high-purity fluid assurance and in the paper industry for release applications. Edlon has introduced newly designed storage tanks for de-ionized water and ultra-pure chemicals and expanded the range of products it sells to chip producers and wafer manufacturers in the semiconductor industry.

Sales, Marketing and Distribution. We sell our Edlon products in the U.S. through a distributor network for higher-volume items, such as lined pipe and fittings, as well as through our direct sales force and sales representatives for lower-volume products. Outside the U.S., we sell our Edlon products through sales representatives, except in the U.K. where we sell our products through our direct sales force.

Markets and Competition. Edlon primarily competes by offering highly engineered products and products made for special needs, which are not readily supplied by competitors. Edlon is able to compete effectively based on its extensive knowledge and application expertise with fluoropolymers.

BACKLOG

Our order backlog was $114.3 million at August 31, 2004 compared with $111.4 million at August 31, 2003. We expect to ship substantially all of our backlog during the next 12 months.

CUSTOMERS

Sales are not concentrated with any customer, as no customer represented more than 5% of sales in fiscal 2004, 2003 or 2002.

5


Table of Contents

RAW MATERIALS

Raw materials are purchased from various vendors that generally are located in the same country as our facility using the raw materials. Because of high global demand for steel, the costs have increased significantly in 2004. However, the supply of steel and other raw materials and components has been adequate and available without significant delivery delays. No events are known or anticipated that would change the availability of raw materials. No one supplier provides more than 5% of our raw materials.

GENERAL

We own a number of patents relating to the design and manufacture of our products. While we consider these patents important to our operations, we believe that the successful manufacture and sale of our products depend more upon technological know-how and manufacturing skills. We are committed to maintaining high quality manufacturing standards and have completed ISO certification at several facilities.

During fiscal 2004, we spent approximately $6.7 million on research and development activities compared with $6.4 million in fiscal 2003 and $6.2 million in fiscal 2002.

Compliance with federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment is not anticipated to have any material effect upon our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

At August 31, 2004, we had 3,824 employees, which included approximately 600 at majority-owned joint ventures. Approximately 725 of these employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements at various locations. The labor agreement with the employees of Chemineer’s principal manufacturing facility extends to March of 2007. The labor agreement with the employees of Pfaudler’s facility in Rochester, New York extends to September 2007. The labor agreement with the employees of Moyno’s principal manufacturing facility expires in February 2005. The Company considers labor relations at each of its locations to be good.

CERTIFICATIONS

Peter C. Wallace, our President and Chief Executive Officer, certified to the New York Stock Exchange on October 22, 2004 that, as of that date, he was not aware of any violation by the Company of the NYSE’s Corporate Governance Listing Standards. We have filed with the SEC the certifications of Mr. Wallace and Kevin J. Brown, our Chief Financial Officer, that are required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 relating to the financial statements and disclosures contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2004.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We make available free of charge on or through our web site, at www.robbinsmyers.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Additionally, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20549. Information regarding operation of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0300. Information that we file with the SEC is also available at the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov.

We also post on our web site the following corporate governance documents: Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct, and the Charters of our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees. Copies of the foregoing documents are also available in print to any shareholder who requests it by writing our Corporate Secretary, Robbins & Myers, Inc., 1400 Kettering Tower, Dayton, Ohio 45423.

6


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Facilities

Our executive offices are located in Dayton, Ohio. The executive offices are leased and occupy approximately 10,000 square feet. Set forth below is certain information relating to our principal operating facilities.

                     
    Square   Products Manufactured or
Location
  Footage
  Other Use of Facility
North and South America:
                   
Rochester, New York
    500,000             Reactor Systems
Springfield, Ohio
    275,000             Industrial Pump Products
Dayton, Ohio
    160,000             Industrial Mixers
Borger, Texas
    115,000             Wellhead products for Energy Systems
Willis, Texas
    110,000             Down-hole pumps and power sections for Energy Systems
Mexico City, Mexico
    110,000             Reactor Systems, Industrial Pumps and Industrial Mixers
Taubate, Brazil
    100,000             Reactor Systems
Charleston, West Virginia
    100,000             Corrosion-Resistant Products
Tomball, Texas
    75,000             Valves and closures for Energy Systems
Avondale, Pennsylvania
    50,000             Corrosion-Resistant Products
West Chester, Pennsylvania
    30,000             Corrosion-Resistant Products
North Andover, Massachusetts
    30,000       (1 )   Industrial Mixers
Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
    30,000             Reactor Systems
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    25,000 to       (2 )   Energy Systems, including two service centers
2 plants
    30,000 each       (1 )    
Pequannock, New Jersey
    62,000       (1 )   Index equipment
 
Europe:
                   
Schwetzingen, Germany
    400,000             Reactor Systems
Leven, Scotland
    240,000             Reactor Systems and Corrosion-Resistant Products
Quarto D’Altino, Italy
    120,000             Reactor Systems
San Donà di Piave, Italy
    90,000             Reactor Systems
Derby, England
    20,000       (1 )   Industrial Mixers
Petit-Rechain, Belgium
    15,000             Power sections for Energy Systems
Bolton, England
    24,000             Reactor Systems
Southampton, England
    10,000       (1 )   Industrial Pump Products
Campbridgeshire, England
    8,500             Distribution Center-Romaco Products
D’Agen, France
    15,000       (1 )(5)   Manufacture of Pharma Modules
Alsbach - Hahnlein, Germany
    21,000             Laetus equipment
Remschingen, Germany
    61,000       (1 )   Siebler equipment
Karlsruhe, Germany
    47,000             Horn & Noack equipment
Neuenburg, Germany
    70,000             Frymakoruma equipment
Bologna, Italy
    44,000       (1 )   Macofar equipment
Bologna, Italy
    11,000       (1 )   Promatic equipment
Milano, Italy
    15,000             Unipac equipment
Lucca, Italy
    52,000             Zanchetta equipment
Volketswil, Switzerland
    50,000       (1 )   HAPA equipment
Rheinfelden, Switzerland
    115,000             Frymakoruma equipment

7


Table of Contents

                     
    Square   Products Manufactured or
Location
  Footage
  Other Use of Facility
Australia
                   
Tingalpa, Brisbane
    24,000       (1 )   Bosspak equipment
 
Asia:
                   
Gujurat, India
    350,000       (3 )   Reactor Systems
Suzhou, China
    150,000       (4 )   Reactor Systems
Singapore
    5,000       (1 )   Industrial Pump Products

(1)   Leased facility.

(2)   R&M Energy Systems also operates an additional 13 (7 U.S., 6 Canada) Service Centers, primarily in leased facilities between 5,000 and 10,000 square feet each. These locations are in the oil producing regions of the U.S. and Canada and manufacture rod guides and distribute other of the Company’s Energy Systems products. Locations are: Bakersfield, California, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Odessa, Texas, Casper, Wyoming, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, Williston, North Dakota, Wooster, Ohio and in Alberta, Canada — Brooks, Elk Point, Provost, Maidstone, Sedgewick and Taber.

(3)   Facility of a 51%-owned subsidiary.

(4)   Facility of a 76%-owned subsidiary.

(5)   Facility of a 50% owned subsidiary.

8


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are claims, suits and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business filed or pending against us. Although we cannot predict the outcome of such claims, suits and complaints with certainty, we do not believe that the disposition of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

9


Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant

Peter C. Wallace, age 50, has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since July 12, 2004. From October 2001 to July 2004, Mr. Wallace was President and CEO of IMI Norgren Group (sophisticated motion and fluid control systems for original equipment manufacturers). He was employed by Rexnord Corporation (power transmission and conveying components) for 25 years serving as President and Group Chief Executive from 1998 until October 2001 and holding a variety of senior sales, marketing, and international positions prior thereto.

Kevin J. Brown, age 46, has been our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2000. Previously, he was our Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since December 1995. Prior to joining us, he was employed by the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP for 15 years.

Saeid Rahimian, age 46, has been a Group Vice President and President of our Reactor Systems business since May 2004. He has also been President of our R&M Energy Systems business since 1998.

John R. Beatty, age 52, has been our Vice President, Human Resources since March 2004. From 1996 to 2004, he was Vice President, Human Resources for DT Industries, Inc., and prior to 1996, he was Director of Human Resources for Rockwell Software Inc., a subsidiary of Rockwell Inc.

Albert L. Raiteri, age 63, has been our Treasurer since December 1998. He has held various positions in finance and accounting for us since 1972.

Thomas J. Schockman, age 40, has been our Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer since March 2000. Prior to joining us, he was employed as Controller at Spinnaker Coating, Inc. for three years and, prior to that, with the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP for ten years.

Joseph M. Rigot, age 61, has been our Secretary and General Counsel since 1990. He has been a partner with the law firm of Thompson Hine LLP, Dayton, Ohio for over 10 years.

The term of office of our executive officers is until the next Annual Meeting of Directors (December 8, 2004) or until their respective successors are elected.

10


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

(A) Our common shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RBN. The prices presented in the following table are the high and low closing prices for the common shares for the periods presented.

                         
                    Dividends
    High
  Low
  Paid
Fiscal 2004
                       
1st Quarter
  $ 23.38     $ 20.49     $ 0.055  
2nd Quarter
    22.45       18.70       0.055  
3rd Quarter
    22.95       19.55       0.055  
4th Quarter
    22.55       17.32       0.055  
Fiscal 2003
                       
1st Quarter
  $ 20.05     $ 14.70     $ 0.055  
2nd Quarter
    19.64       14.80       0.055  
3rd Quarter
    19.25       13.29       0.055  
4th Quarter
    22.77       18.50       0.055  

(B) As of October 15, 2004, we had approximately 549 shareholders of record. Based on requests from brokers and other nominees, we estimate there are approximately an additional 2,340 shareholders.

(C) Dividends paid on common shares are presented in the table in Item 5(A). Our credit agreement includes certain covenants which restrict our payment of dividends. The amount of cash dividends plus stock repurchases we may incur in each fiscal year is restricted to the greater of $3,500,000 or 50% of our net income for the immediately preceding fiscal year, plus a portion of any unused amounts from the preceding fiscal year. For purposes of this test, stock repurchases related to stock option exercises or in connection with withholding taxes due under any stock plan in which employees or directors participate are not included. Under this formula, such cash dividends and treasury stock purchases in fiscal 2005 are limited to $8,477,000.

11


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected Financial Data (1)
Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except percents, per share, shareholder and employee data)

                                                         
    5 Year                        
    Average                        
    Growth
  2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
  1999
Operating Results
                                                       
Orders
    9.5 %   $ 586,948     $ 546,357     $ 508,943     $ 427,275     $ 412,948     $ 373,135  
Ending backlog
            114,267       111,375       125,665       143,522       80,484       74,330  
Sales
    7.9       585,758       560,775       526,373       425,902       406,714       400,142  
Gross profit (2)
    7.2       193,004       188,816       173,764       140,734       140,234       136,166  
EBIT (2,3,4)
    (1.9 )     30,317       38,709       40,947       43,236       43,572       33,288  
Net income (2,3)
    (3.8 )     9,770       14,368       14,503       19,631       18,056       11,849  
Financial Condition
                                                       
Total assets
          $ 733,242     $ 704,456     $ 679,925     $ 660,260     $ 495,679     $ 493,852  
Total debt
            181,702       193,603       208,446       258,894       177,864       191,272  
Shareholders’ equity
            303,112       287,006       260,493       197,902       167,182       154,226  
Total capitalization
            484,814       480,609       468,939       456,796       345,046       345,498  
Performance Statistics
                                                       
Percent of sales:
                                                       
Gross profit (2)
            32.9 %     33.7 %     33.0 %     33.0 %     34.5 %     34.0 %
EBIT (2,3,4)
            5.2       6.9       7.8       10.2       10.7       8.3  
Debt as a % of total capitalization
            37.5       40.3       44.5       56.7       51.5       55.4  
EBIT return on average net assets (9)
            6.0       8.0       8.9       12.4       12.6       9.3  
Net income return on avg. equity
            3.2       5.2       6.7       11.2       11.2       7.8  
Per Share Data
                                                       
Net income per share, diluted (2,3)
    (8.8 )%   $ 0.67     $ 1.00     $ 1.15     $ 1.63     $ 1.53     $ 1.06  
Dividends declared
    0.0       0.22       0.22       0.22       0.22       0.22       0.22  
Market price of common stock:
                                                       
High
          $ 23.38     $ 22.77     $ 29.28     $ 29.25     $ 24.50     $ 25.88  
Low
            17.32       13.29       18.91       21.56       15.19       15.69  
Close
    (4.1 )%     19.10       22.73       18.91       28.38       23.88       23.50  
P/E ratio at August 31, diluted
            28.51       22.73       16.44       17.41       15.61       22.17  
Other Data
                                                       
Cash flow from operations
          $ 26,353     $ 45,636     $ 44,540     $ 30,984     $ 36,040     $ 39,463  
Capital expenditures, net
            9,884       7,869       15,112       20,200       19,842       11,612  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Free cash flow (5)
            16,469       37,767       29,428       10,784       16,198       27,851  
Amortization (3)
          $ 2,738     $ 2,189     $ 2,015     $ 8,187     $ 8,077     $ 7,660  
Depreciation
            18,639       20,093       20,028       16,161       16,293       16,861  
Enterprise value (6)
    0.5 %     459,168       521,483       479,483       591,650       439,493       448,386  
Shares outstanding at year end
            14,527       14,425       14,333       11,726       10,956       10,941  
Average diluted shares (7)
            16,285       16,492       14,688       13,465       13,416       13,535  
Number of shareholders (8)
            2,889       2,875       2,809       2,885       2,932       3,256  
Number of employees
            3,824       3,904       3,921       4,334       3,284       3,244  

Notes to Selected Financial Data

1.   Fiscal 2003 reflected the acquisition of Tarby on November 15, 2002. Fiscal 2001 reflected the acquisition of Romaco on August 31, 2001. The August 31, 2001 consolidated balance sheet data included Romaco, but the fiscal 2001 consolidated income statement data did not include Romaco.
 
2.   Fiscal 2004 included charges of $1,378,000 related to the retirement of our former President & CEO and severance costs of $761,000 related to the consolidation of our Reactor Systems business in Italy. See Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Fiscal 2001 included charges of $2,492,000 related to our global reorganization program, including inventory write-downs of $1,000,000 that are included in gross profit. Fiscal 2000 included charges of $409,000 relating to the closure of our Fairfield, California manufacturing facility, a gain of $918,000 related to the sale of our Fairfield facility and a charge of $500,000 related to Universal Glasteel Equipment, Inc. Fiscal 1999 included charges of

12


Table of Contents

    $4,769,000 primarily for the closure of our Fairfield facility and severance and early retirement costs of $1,600,000. These special items decreased fiscal 2004 net income by $1,390,000 ($.10 per diluted share), decreased fiscal 2001 net income by $1,670,000 ($0.12 per diluted share), increased fiscal 2000 net income by $6,000 ($0.00 per diluted share) and decreased fiscal 1999 net income by $4,204,000 ($0.31 per diluted share).
 
3.   In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 142 established accounting and reporting standards for intangible assets and goodwill. It required that goodwill and certain intangible assets no longer be amortized to earnings, but instead be reviewed periodically for impairment. We adopted this pronouncement as of the beginning of fiscal 2002. Had the new pronouncement been adopted at the beginning of fiscal 1999 (i) goodwill amortization in the following amounts would not have been recorded in the periods indicated: fiscal 2001, $5,420,000; fiscal 2000, $5,541,000; and fiscal 1999, $5,439,000; and (ii) net income per diluted share in the periods indicated would have been as follows: fiscal 2001, $1.88; fiscal 2000, $1.80; and fiscal 1999, $1.32.
 
4.   EBIT represents income before interest and income taxes and is reconciled to net income on our Consolidated Income Statement. EBIT is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and should not be considered as an alternative to net income as a measure of our operating results. EBIT is not a measure of cash available for use by management. We evaluate performance of our business segments and allocate resources based on EBIT.
 
5.   Free Cash Flow represents net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities, less capital expenditures. Free Cash Flow is used as a measure of cash generated for acquisitions and financing activities. Free Cash Flow is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and should not be considered an alternative to cash flow as a measure of our liquidity.
 
6.   Market capitalization of shares outstanding at year end plus total debt.
 
7.   Fiscal 2004 reflected an additional 1,778,000 shares, fiscal 2003 reflected an additional 2,090,000 shares, fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001 reflected an additional 2,190,000 shares, fiscal 2000 reflected an additional 2,297,000 shares and fiscal 1999 reflected an additional 2,385,000 shares related to the convertible notes outstanding.
 
8.   As of September 1, 2004, we had 549 shareholders of record. Based on requests from brokers and other nominees, we estimate there were an additional 2,340 shareholders.
 
9.   EBIT return on average net assets is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and should not be considered as an alternative to net income return on average equity. EBIT return on average net assets is computed as EBIT divided by the summation of total assets less accounts payable, accrued liabilities, deferred tax liabilities, other long-term liabilities and minority interest. This measure is used to evaluate the return on the assets employed by our business segments.

13


Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

We are a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of highly engineered, application-critical equipment and systems for the pharmaceutical, energy and industrial markets worldwide. In our estimation our principal brand names – Pfaudler®, Moyno®, Chemineer®, Laetus®, FrymaKoruma®, Siebler®, Hapa® and Hercules® – hold the number one or two market share position in the niche markets they serve. We operate with three market focused business segments: Pharmaceutical, Energy and Industrial.

Pharmaceutical. Our Pharmaceutical business segment includes our Reactor Systems and Romaco businesses and is focused primarily on the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries. Our Reactor Systems business designs, manufacturers and markets primary processing equipment and engineered systems and we believe has the leading worldwide position in glass-lined reactors and storage vessels. Our Romaco business designs, manufacturers and markets secondary processing, dosing, filling, printing and security equipment. Several of our Romaco brands hold the number one or two worldwide position in the niche markets they serve. Major customers of our pharmaceutical segment include Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis and Pfizer.

Energy. Our Energy business segment designs, manufactures and markets equipment and systems used in oil and gas exploration and recovery. Our equipment and systems include hydraulic drilling power sections, down-hole pumps and a broad line of ancillary equipment, such as rod guides, rod and tubing rotators, wellhead systems, pipeline closure products and valves. These products and systems are used at the wellhead and in subsurface drilling and production. Several of our energy products, including hydraulic drilling power sections and down-hole pumps, hold the number one or two worldwide position in their respective markets. Major customers of our energy segment include Schlumberger and Chevron Texaco.

Industrial. Our Industrial business segment is comprised of our Moyno, Tarby, Chemineer and Edlon businesses, which design, manufacture and market products that are used in specialty chemical, wastewater treatment and a variety of other industrial applications. Our Moyno and Tarby businesses manufacture pumps that utilize progressing cavity technology to provide fluids-handling solutions for a wide range of applications involving the flow of viscous, abrasive and solid-laden slurries and sludges. Our Chemineer business manufactures high-quality standard and customized fluid-agitation equipment and systems. Our Edlon business manufactures customized fluoropolymer-lined pipe, fittings, vessels and accessories. Our industrial segment has a highly diversified customer base and sells its products to over 3,500 customers worldwide.

Acquisition

In our Industrial Segment, we will pursue strategic acquisitions if cost structure can be improved or market share protected. On November 15, 2002, we purchased the stock of Tarby, Inc (“Tarby”) for $13.1 million. Tarby is a manufacturer and marketer of progressive cavity pumps and components for the general industrial and municipal wastewater markets. Included in our fiscal 2003 operating results are sales of $6.2 million and EBIT of $1.5 million from Tarby since the date of acquisition.

Safe Harbor Statement

In addition to historical information, this Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, identified by use of words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” and similar expressions. These statements reflect the Company’s expectations at the time this Form 10-K was filed. Actual events and results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause material differences are a significant decline in capital expenditures in specialty chemical and pharmaceutical industries, a major decline in oil and natural gas prices, foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the impacts of Sarbanes-Oxley section 404 procedures, work stoppages related to union negotiations, customer order cancellations, the ability of the Company to comply with the financial covenants and other provisions of its financing arrangements, the ability of the Company to realize the benefits of its restructuring program in its Pharmaceutical Segment and general economic conditions that can affect demand in the process industries. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement.

14


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following tables present components of our consolidated income statement and segment information.

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
Consolidated
                       
Sales
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of sales
    67.1       66.3       67.0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Gross profit
    32.9       33.7       33.0  
SG&A expenses
    26.9       26.4       24.8  
Amortization
    0.5       0.4       0.4  
Other
    0.3       0.0       0.0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
EBIT
    5.2 %     6.9 %     7.8 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
    (In thousands, except percents)
By Segment
                       
Pharmaceutical:
                       
Sales
  $ 343,047     $ 342,415     $ 319,412  
EBIT
    10,317       21,401       27,895  
EBIT %
    3.0 %     6.3 %     8.7 %
Energy:
                       
Sales
  $ 115,884     $ 95,487     $ 91,381  
EBIT
    27,424       20,941       18,773  
EBIT %
    23.7 %     21.9 %     20.5 %
Industrial:
                       
Sales
  $ 126,827     $ 122,873     $ 115,580  
EBIT
    8,349       8,791       5,279  
EBIT %
    6.6 %     7.2 %     4.6 %
Total:
                       
Sales
  $ 585,758     $ 560,775     $ 526,373  
EBIT
    30,317       38,709       40,947  
EBIT %
    5.2 %     6.9 %     7.8 %

Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2004 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2003

Sales for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004 were $585.8 million compared with $560.8 million in fiscal 2003. Foreign currency translation caused an increase in sales of $36.9 million resulting in a sales decline of $11.9 million on a constant dollar basis. The decline in sales is a result of lower sales in our Pharmaceutical segment offset by strengthening sales in our Energy and Industrial segments.

The Pharmaceutical segment had sales of $343.0 million in fiscal 2004 compared with $342.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2003. The impact of exchange rates increased sales by $33.4 million resulting in a sales decline of $32.8 million on a constant dollar basis. The decline in sales volumes is a result of continued weak economic conditions in Europe, which represents approximately 75% of this segment’s sales volume. Our sales were negatively affected by reduced capital spending by pharmaceutical companies due to general weakness in the capital goods markets in Europe and the business consolidations within the pharmaceutical industry. The consolidation of pharmaceutical companies has resulted in excess capacity as product lines are rationalized among facilities. The excess capacity as a result of the consolidations is viewed as a short-term issue because normal wear and tear on equipment will eventually lead to replacement and the consumption of pharmaceutical products is expected to continue to grow.

The Energy segment had sales of $115.9 million in fiscal 2004 compared with $95.5 million in the same period of fiscal 2003, an increase of $20.4 million, or 21.4%. The impact of exchange rates increased sales by $3.1 million resulting in a sales increase of $17.3 million on a constant dollar basis. Higher oil and natural gas prices and accelerated global demand are being reflected in higher rig count and capital equipment spending in this industry. It is anticipated that these trends should continue through our fiscal 2005.

15


Table of Contents

The Industrial segment had sales of $126.8 million in fiscal 2004 compared with $122.9 million in fiscal 2003, an increase of $3.9 million, or 3.2%. This modest increase in sales is attributed to some improvement in the U.S. industrial economy offset by lower spending for wastewater treatment projects by local municipalities.

EBIT in fiscal 2004 was $30.3 million compared with $38.7 million in fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2004, we recorded costs of $1.4 million related to the retirement of our former President and CEO and $0.8 million for severance costs related to the closure of a Reactor Systems facility in Italy. The sales volume decline in constant dollars of $11.9 had a negative impact on EBIT of $4.1 million. The remaining decline in EBIT is a result of price pressures in our Pharmaceutical segment ($1.0 million), higher health care costs ($1.0 million) and a shift in sales mix as aftermarket sales in our Industrial Segment were a lower percentage of 2004 sales relative to fiscal 2003.

The Pharmaceutical segment had EBIT of $10.3 million in fiscal 2004 compared with $21.4 million in fiscal 2003, a decline of $11.1 million. The severance costs of $0.8 million related to the closure of a Reactor Systems’ facility in Italy were reflected in this segment. The sales decline of $32.8 million on a constant dollar basis reduced EBIT by $10.5 million, while price pressures in Europe negatively impacted EBIT by another $1.0 million. These items were partially offset by our efforts to reduce both material and overhead costs in response to the lower sales volumes.

The Energy segment had EBIT of $27.4 million in fiscal 2004 compared with $20.9 million in fiscal 2003, an increase of $6.5 million, or 31.1%. The higher sales volumes caused EBIT to increase by $7.0 million. This was partially offset by new product development costs and costs to establish operations in new markets such as Kazakhstan and Indonesia.

The Industrial segment had EBIT of $8.3 million in fiscal 2004 compared with $8.8 million in fiscal 2003, a decrease of $0.5 million. The aforementioned $3.9 million increase in sales volumes only increased EBIT by $0.5 million because of a change in sales mix as the aftermarket business was a smaller percentage of fiscal 2004 sales. In addition, higher health care costs of approximately $1.0 million negatively impacted EBIT in this segment.

Interest expense decreased from $15.6 million in fiscal 2003 to $14.4 million in fiscal 2004. This was due to lower average debt levels resulting from cash flow generated in fiscal 2004. In addition, fiscal 2004 includes the full year interest savings from our interest rate swap instrument, whereas the interest rate swap was only in effect for approximately one quarter of fiscal 2003. Our effective interest rate was 7.1% in fiscal 2004 and 7.3% in fiscal 2003.

Net income and net income per diluted share in fiscal 2004 were $9.8 million and $0.67 compared with $14.4 million and $1.00 in fiscal 2003. The lower net income is a result of the items mentioned above.

Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2003 Compared with Fiscal Year Ended August 31, 2002

Sales for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2003 were $560.8 million, an increase of $34.4 million or 6.5% over the prior fiscal year. The impact of exchange rates, the translation of sales from non-U.S. operations into U.S. dollars, accounted for $39.1 million of sales.

The Pharmaceutical segment had sales of $342.4 million in fiscal 2003 compared with $319.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2002. The impact of exchange rates increased sales by $39.7 million resulting in a decrease of $16.7 million on a constant dollar basis. The decline in sales volumes is in both our Romaco and Reactor Systems units and is due to weak market conditions in Europe.

The Energy segment had sales of $95.5 million in fiscal 2003 compared with $91.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2002, an increase of $4.1 million, or 4.5%. Most of this increase in sales has occurred in the last quarter of our fiscal year and is due to higher rig counts as a result of higher crude oil and natural gas prices and increased sales in Venezuela.

The Industrial segment had sales of $122.9 million in fiscal 2003 compared with $115.6 million in fiscal 2002, an increase of $7.3 million, or 6.3%. Our acquisition of Tarby on November 15, 2002, accounted for $6.2 million of this increase. The remaining increase is a result of an improving industrial economic environment in North America in the latter part of our fiscal year.

16


Table of Contents

EBIT in fiscal 2003 was $38.7 million compared with $40.9 million in fiscal 2002.

The Pharmaceutical segment had EBIT of $21.4 million in fiscal 2003 compared with $27.9 million in fiscal 2002, a decline of $6.5 million. Of this decrease, $5.5 million related to the aforementioned sales decrease in constant dollars of $16.7 million, excluding the impact of exchange rates, with the remainder of the decline due to lower pricing in Europe for glass-lined reactor vessels.

The Energy segment had EBIT of $20.9 million in fiscal 2003 compared with $18.8 million in fiscal 2002, an increase of $2.1 million, or 11.2%. Two thirds of this increased EBIT is a result of higher sales volumes, with the remaining increase coming from cost reduction programs implemented in fiscal 2002 that were fully realized in fiscal 2003.

The Industrial segment had EBIT of $8.8 million in fiscal 2003 compared with $5.3 million in fiscal 2002, an increase of $3.5 million. The Tarby acquisition accounted for $1.5 million of this increase. The remaining increase in EBIT is due to slightly higher sales volumes and cost saving measures undertaken in fiscal 2002 that were realized in fiscal 2003.

Interest expense decreased from $17.6 million in fiscal 2002 to $15.6 million in fiscal 2003. This was due to lower average debt levels resulting from cash flow generated in fiscal 2003 and our secondary stock offering in June of fiscal 2002 that raised net proceeds of $53.2 million. Our effective interest rate was 7.3% in fiscal 2003 and 7.0% in fiscal 2002.

Net income and net income per diluted share in fiscal 2003 were $14.4 million and $1.00 compared with $14.5 million and $1.15 in fiscal 2002. The lower net income is a result of the items mentioned above, and the relatively larger decline in net income per share is a result of having 1.8 million more average common shares outstanding as a result of the secondary stock offering in June of fiscal 2002.

Restructuring

We have announced a restructuring plan of our Pharmaceutical segment. The restructuring plan is being initiated to improve the profitability of the Pharmaceutical segment in light of the current worldwide economic conditions that are affecting this segment. The restructuring activities will include the following:

  Plant closures (one of two Reactor Systems facilities in Italy, a Reactor Systems facility in Mexico and the Unipac facility of Romaco in Italy).
 
  Headcount reductions to support the Reactor Systems business reorganization and to bring the personnel costs in line with the current level of business.
 
  Headcount reductions at Romaco with the Unipac integration into the Macofar facility and removal of duplicate administrative costs at other locations.

As a result of the restructuring plan, we will record expenses of approximately $7.0 million in the first half of our fiscal year ending August 31, 2005. Approximately $5.5 to $6.0 million of the costs relate to termination benefits as we reduce our workforce by approximately 225 people. The remaining costs primarily relate to the write-down of inventory of discontinued products. The total cash outlays in connection with the restructuring plan are estimated to be between $5.5 and $6.0 million. We estimate that the restructuring plan will be substantially completed by the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

The facilities that are being closed are currently owned by us and will be sold. We expect the facility sales to generate approximately $8.0 to $10.0 million of cash proceeds which exceeds the recorded book value of these facilities by approximately $3.0 to $5.0 million. The facilities are in excellent condition and are believed to be readily marketable, but we are unable to predict the specific timing of the sale of any one or all of the facilities.

17


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating Activities

In fiscal 2004, our cash flow from operations was $26.4 million compared with $45.6 million in fiscal 2003. The lower cash flow from operations is a result of higher working capital because of higher orders and sales in the latter half of fiscal 2004.

We expect our fiscal 2005 operating cash flow to be adequate to fund the fiscal year 2005 operating needs, scheduled debt services, shareholder dividend requirements and planned capital expenditures of approximately $20.0 million. Our planned capital expenditures are related to additional production capacity, cost reductions and replacement items.

Investing Activities

Our capital expenditures were $9.9 million in fiscal 2004, up from $7.9 million in fiscal 2003. The majority of our capital expenditures were for replacement of equipment.

Financing Activities

We paid $1.1 million to amend and extend our credit agreement in October 2003.

Credit Agreement

Our Bank Credit Agreement (“Agreement”) provides that we may borrow on a revolving credit basis up to a maximum of $125.0 million. All outstanding amounts under the Agreement are due and payable on October 7, 2006. Interest is variable based upon formulas tied to LIBOR or prime, at our option, and is payable at least quarterly. At August 31, 2004, the weighted average interest rate for all amounts outstanding was 4.07%. Indebtedness under the Agreement is unsecured, except for guarantees by our U.S. subsidiaries, the pledge of the stock of our U.S. subsidiaries and the pledge of the stock of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. Under this Agreement and other lines of credit, we have $120.0 million of unused borrowing capacity. However, due to our financial covenants and outstanding standby letters of credit, we could only incur additional indebtedness of $11.6 million. We have $23.5 million of standby letters of credit outstanding at August 31, 2004. These standby letters of credit are used as security for advance payments received from customers and future payments to our vendors. We are currently in negotiations with our lenders to increase our borrowing capacity in light of the restructuring programs in process in our Pharmaceutical segment.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” is based on our consolidated financial statements and the related notes. The more critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are discussed below.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue at the time of title passage to our customer. In instances where we have equipment installation obligations, the revenue related to the installation service is deferred until installation is complete. We recognize revenue for certain longer-term contracts based on the percentage of completion method. The percentage of completion method requires estimates of total expected contract revenue and costs. We follow this method since we can make reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and cost applicable to various stages of the contract. Revisions in profit estimates are reflected in the period in which the facts that gave rise to the revision become known.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the related notes. Significant estimates made by us include the allowance for doubtful

18


Table of Contents

accounts, inventory valuation, deferred tax asset valuation allowance, warranty accruals, litigation, product liability, environmental accruals and retirement benefit obligations.

Our estimate for uncollectible accounts receivable is based upon an analysis of our prior collection experience, specific customer creditworthiness and current economic trends within the industries we serve. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation to us (e.g., bankruptcy filings or substantial downgrading of credit ratings), we record a specific reserve to reduce the receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debts based on the length of time that the receivables are past due.

Inventory valuation reserves are determined based on our assessment of the market conditions for our products and the on hand quantities of inventory in relation to historical usage. As of August 31, 2004 we have inventory valuation reserves of $20.7 million. The inventory upon which this reserve relates to is still on hand and will be sold or disposed of in the future. The expected selling price of this inventory approximates its net book value, therefore there is no significant impact on gross margin when it is sold.

We have recorded valuation allowances to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized based upon our analysis of estimated future taxable income and establishment of tax strategies. Future taxable income, the results of tax strategies and changes in tax laws could impact these estimates.

Warranty obligations are contingent upon product failure rates, material required for the repairs and service delivery costs. We estimate the warranty accrual based on specific product failures that are known to us plus an additional amount based on the historical relationship of warranty claims to sales. We record litigation, product liability and environmental reserves based upon a case-by-case analysis of the facts, circumstances and estimated costs.

These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of our assets and liabilities and are based on the best available information at the time we prepare our financial statements. These estimates are subject to change as conditions within and beyond our control change, including but not limited to economic conditions, the availability of additional information and actual experience rates different from those used in our estimates. Accordingly, actual results may differ from these estimates.

Goodwill

As of September 1, 2001, we adopted two new accounting standards issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” eliminated the pooling method of accounting for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, and addressed the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Accordingly, we applied the provisions of SFAS No. 141 to all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. We also adopted SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” effective September 1, 2001. Goodwill amortization ceased upon adoption of the standard, and the required impairment tests were performed. Results of these impairment tests have not generated any impairment loss to date.

Goodwill is tested on an annual basis, or more frequently as impairment indicators arise. Impairment tests, which involve the use of estimates related to the fair market values of the business operations with which goodwill is associated, are performed at the end of our first quarter. Losses, if any, resulting from impairment tests will be reflected in operating income in our Consolidated Income Statement.

Foreign Currency Accounting

Gains and losses resulting from the settlement of a transaction in a currency different from that used to record the transaction are charged or credited to net income when incurred. Adjustments resulting from the translation of non-U.S. financial statements into U.S. dollars are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss for all non-U.S. units.

We use permanently invested intercompany loans as a source of capital to reduce the exposure to foreign currency fluctuations in our foreign subsidiaries. These loans are treated as analogous to equity for accounting purposes. Therefore, we record foreign exchange gains or losses on these intercompany loans in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.

19


Table of Contents

Pensions

We maintain defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans that provide retirement benefits to substantially all U.S. employees and certain non-U.S. employees. Pension expense for fiscal 2005 and beyond is dependent on a number of factors including returns on plan assets and changes in the plan’s discount rate and therefore cannot be predicted with certainty at this time. The following paragraphs discuss the significant factors that affect the amount of recorded pension expense.

A significant factor in determining the amount of expense recorded for the funded pension plan is the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. We develop the long-term rate of return assumption based on the current mix of equity and debt securities included in the plan’s assets and on the historical returns on those types of investments, judgmentally adjusted to reflect current expectations of future returns.

In addition to the expected rate of return on plan assets, recorded pension expense includes the effects of service cost – the actuarial cost of benefits earned during a period – and interest on the plan’s liabilities to participants. These amounts are determined actuarially based on current discount rates and assumptions regarding matters such as future salary increases and mortality. Differences in actual experience in relation to these assumptions are generally not recognized immediately but rather are deferred together with asset-related gains or losses. When cumulative asset-related and liability-related gains or losses exceed the greater of 10% of total liabilities or the calculated value of plan assets, the excess is amortized and included in pension income or expense. At August 31, 2004 the discount rate used to value the liabilities of the principal U.S. plan was 6.0%. We determine our discount rate based on the Moody’s Aa Corporate Bond Index and an actuarial yield curve applied to the payments we expect to make out of our retirement plans.

Additional changes in the key assumptions discussed above would affect the amount of pension expense currently expected to be recorded for years subsequent to 2004. Specifically, a one-half percent decrease in the rate of return on assets assumption would have the effect of increasing pension expense by approximately $0.3 million. A comparable increase in this assumption would have the opposite effect. In addition, a one-half percent increase or decrease in the discount rate would decrease or increase expense by approximately $0.1 million.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Staff Position 106-2 (“FAS 106-2”) providing final guidance on accounting for the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“the Act”). We adopted the provisions of FAS 106-2 during the year ended August 31, 2004. This resulted in a reduction in our accumulated postretirement benefit obligations (“APBO”) for the subsidy related to benefits attributed to past services of $3.5 million. The subsidy resulted in a reduction in our current period net periodic postretirement benefit costs for the year ended August 31, 2004 of $0.2 million. We have not incurred a reduction in current gross benefit payments and expect to receive subsidy payments beginning in fiscal year ended August 31, 2006.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51.” The Interpretation requires the consolidation of entities in which an enterprise absorbs a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual or other financial interest in the entity. Currently, entities are generally consolidated by an enterprise when it has a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority voting interest in the entity. The adoption of Financial Interpretation No. 46 had no effect on our financial statements.

20


Table of Contents

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We maintain operations in the U.S. and over 20 foreign countries. We have market risk exposure to foreign exchange rates in the normal course of our business operations. Our significant non-U.S. operations have their local currencies as their functional currency and primarily buy and sell using that same currency. We manage our exposure to net assets and cash flows in currencies other than U.S. dollars by minimizing our non-U.S. dollar net asset positions. We also enter into hedging transactions, primarily currency swaps, under established policies and guidelines that enable us to mitigate the potential adverse impact of foreign exchange rate risk. We do not engage in trading or other speculative activities with these transactions as established policies require that these hedging transactions relate to specific currency exposures.

Our main foreign exchange rate exposures relate to assets, liabilities and cash flows denominated in British pounds, euros and Canadian dollars and the general economic exposure that fluctuations in these currencies could have on the U.S. dollar value of future non-U.S. cash flows. To illustrate the potential impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on us for fiscal 2004, the net unhedged exposures in each currency were remeasured assuming a 10% decrease in foreign exchange rates compared with the U.S. dollar. Using this method, our EBIT and cash flow from operations for fiscal 2004 would have decreased by $1.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively. This calculation assumed that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the U.S. dollar. In addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates, these changes may also affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales prices as competitors’ products become more or less attractive. Our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not include any effects of potential changes in sales levels or local currency prices.

We also have market risk exposure to interest rates. At August 31, 2004, we had $181.7 million in interest-bearing debt obligations subject to market risk exposure due to changes in interest rates. To manage our exposure to changes in interest rates, we attempt to maintain a balance between fixed and variable rate debt. We expect this balance in the debt profile to moderate our financing cost over time. We are limited in our ability to refinance our fixed rate debt. However, we have the ability to change the characteristics of our fixed rate debt to variable rate debt through interest rate swaps to achieve our objective of balance. We have entered into an interest rate swap agreement that effectively modifies a portion of our fixed rate debt to floating rate debt. This agreement involves the receipt of fixed rate amounts in exchange for floating rate interest payments over the life of the agreement without an exchange of underlying principal amounts. The mark-to-market values of both the fair value hedging instrument and the underlying debt obligation were equal and recorded as offsetting gains and losses in current period earnings. The fair value hedge qualifies for treatment under the short-cut method of measuring effectiveness. As a result, there was no impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness. The interest rate swap agreement totals $30.0 million, expires in 2008 and allows us to receive an effective interest rate of 6.76% and pay an interest rate based on LIBOR.

At August 31, 2004, $141.3 million of our outstanding debt was at fixed rates with a weighted average interest rate of 7.6% and $40.4 million was at variable rates with a weighted average interest rate of 5.2%. The estimated fair value of our debt at August 31, 2004 was approximately $182.0 million. The following table presents the aggregate maturities and related weighted average interest rates of our debt obligations at August 31, 2004 by maturity dates:

21


Table of Contents

                                                                 
  U.S. Dollar   U.S. Dollar   Non-U.S. Dollar   Non-U.S. Dollar
  Fixed Rate
  Variable Rate
  Fixed Rate
  Variable Rate
Maturity Date
  Amount
  Rate
  Amount
  Rate
  Amount
  Rate
  Amount
  Rate
                            (In thousands, except percents)                        
2005
  $ 0       0.00 %   $ 700       4.25 %   $ 3,357       4.57 %   $ 4,276       4.13 %
2006
    0       0.00       700       4.25       27,215       9.71       1,204       3.46  
2007
    0       0.00       3,500       4.75       202       3.97       0       0.00  
2008
    80,000       7.38       30,000       5.50       208       3.69       0       0.00  
2009
    0       0.00       0       0.00       133       2.00       0       0.00  
Thereafter
    30,000       6.84       0       0.00       207       2.00       0       0.00  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 110,000       7.23 %   $ 34,900       5.37 %   $ 31,322       9.00 %   $ 5,480       3.98 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Fair value
  $ 110,300             $ 34,900             $ 31,322             $ 5,480          
 
   
 
             
 
             
 
             
 
         

Following is information regarding our long-term contractual obligations and other commitments outstanding as of August 31, 2004:

                                         
    Payments Due by Period
                    Two to        
Long-term contractual           One year   three   Four to   After five
obligations
  Total
  or less
  years
  five years
  years
                    (In thousands)                
Debt obligations
  $ 181,702     $ 8,333     $ 32,821     $ 110,341     $ 30,207  
Capital lease obligations
    0       0       0       0       0  
Operating leases (1)
    20,342       4,476       6,845       3,392       5,629  
Unconditional purchase obligations
    0       0       0       0       0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total contractual cash obligations
  $ 202,044     $ 12,809     $ 39,666     $ 113,733     $ 35,836  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

(1)   Operating leases consist primarily of building and equipment leases.

                                         
    Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
                    Two to        
Other commercial           One year   three   Four to   After five
commitments
  Total
  or less
  years
  five years
  years
                    (In thousands)                
Lines of credit
  $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  
Standby letters of credit
    23,459       23,459       0       0       0  
Guarantees
    0       0       0       0       0  
Standby repurchase obligations
    0       0       0       0       0  
Other commercial commitments
    696       484       212       0       0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total commercial commitments
  $ 24,155     $ 23,943     $ 212     $ 0     $ 0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

22


Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Management

The management of Robbins & Myers, Inc. has the responsibility for preparing the accompanying financial statements and for their integrity and objectivity. Management believes that the financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, appropriate in the circumstances, and that other information in this annual report is consistent with these financial statements. In preparing the financial statements, management makes informed judgments and estimates where necessary to reflect expected effects of events and transactions that have not been resolved.

In fulfilling this responsibility, management maintains accounting system and related controls. These controls provide reasonable assurance, at appropriate costs, that assets are safeguarded against losses and that financial records are reliable for use in preparing financial statements. These systems are enhanced by written policies, an organization structure providing division of responsibilities, careful selection and training of qualified people and a program of financial, operational and systems review coordinated by management.

Our financial statements have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. Management has made available to Ernst & Young LLP all of our financial records and related data, as well as the minutes of shareholders’ and directors’ meetings. Furthermore, management believes that all representations made to Ernst & Young LLP during their audit are valid and appropriate.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, composed solely of outside directors, meets with the independent registered public accounting firm and management periodically to review their work and ensure that they are properly discharging their responsibilities. The independent registered public accounting firm has free access to this committee, without management present, to discuss the results of their audit work and their opinion on the adequacy of internal financial controls and the quality of financial reporting.

     
/s/ Peter C. Wallace
   

   
Peter C. Wallace
   
President and Chief Executive Officer
   
 
   
/s/ Kevin J. Brown
   

   
Kevin J. Brown
   
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
   

23


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Shareholders and Board of Directors
Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of August 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the Standards of the Public Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries at August 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Dayton, Ohio
October 5, 2004

24


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except share data)

                 
    August 31,
    2004
  2003
ASSETS
               
Current Assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 8,640     $ 12,347  
Accounts receivable
    128,571       117,896  
Inventories
    107,478       96,196  
Other current assets
    7,794       8,180  
Deferred taxes
    7,901       7,469  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total Current Assets
    260,384       242,088  
Goodwill
    307,166       294,904  
Other Intangible Assets
    15,769       15,844  
Other Assets
    10,216       9,657  
Property, Plant and Equipment
    139,707       141,963  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 733,242     $ 704,456  
 
   
 
     
 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Current Liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 61,540     $ 49,588  
Accrued expenses
    93,035       85,158  
Current portion of long-term debt
    8,333       7,319  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total Current Liabilities
    162,908       142,065  
Long-Term Debt - Less Current Portion
    173,369       186,284  
Deferred Taxes
    4,329       7,860  
Other Long-Term Liabilities
    80,298       72,622  
Minority Interest
    9,226       8,619  
Shareholders’ Equity:
               
Common stock-without par value:
               
Authorized shares-40,000,000
               
Issued shares-14,526,860 in 2004 (14,425,682 in 2003)
    106,985       104,984  
Treasury shares-308 in 2004 and 2003
    (10 )     (10 )
Retained earnings
    194,530       187,845  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
               
Foreign currency translation
    17,149       5,175  
Minimum pension liability
    (15,542 )     (10,988 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total
    1,607       (5,813 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    303,112       287,006  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 733,242     $ 704,456  
 
   
 
     
 
 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

25


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY STATEMENT
Robbins & Myers Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

                                         
                            Accumulated    
                            Other    
                            Comprehensive    
    Common   Treasury   Retained   Income    
    Shares
  Shares
  Earnings
  (Loss)
  Total
Balance at September 1, 2001
  $ 48,483     $ (2,150 )   $ 164,864     $ (13,295 )   $ 197,902  
Net income
                    14,503               14,503  
Change in foreign currency translation
                            1,501       1,501  
Change in minimum pension liability
                            (8,263 )     (8,263 )
 
                                   
 
 
Comprehensive income
                                    7,741  
Cash dividends declared, $0.22 per share
                    (2,740 )             (2,740 )
Stock options exercised, 167,500 shares
    604       1,921                       2,525  
Proceeds from share sales, 2,440,323 shares
    54,267       200                       54,467  
Performance stock award expense
    (126 )                             (126 )
Tax benefit of stock options exercised
    724                               724  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at August 31, 2002
    103,952       (29 )     176,627       (20,057 )     260,493  
Net income
                    14,368               14,368  
Change in foreign currency translation
                            14,576       14,576  
Change in minimum pension liability
                            (332 )     (332 )
 
                                   
 
 
Comprehensive income
                                    28,612  
Cash dividend declared, $0.22 per share
                    (3,150 )             (3,150 )
Stock options exercised, 36,000 shares
    357                               357  
Proceeds from share sales, 55,876 shares
    519       19                       538  
Tax benefit of stock option exercised
    156                               156  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at August 31, 2003
    104,984       (10 )     187,845       (5,813 )     287,006  
Net income
                    9,770               9,770  
Change in foreign currency translation
                            11,974       11,974  
Change in minimum pension liability
                            (4,554 )     (4,554 )
 
                                   
 
 
Comprehensive income
                                    17,190  
Cash dividend declared, $0.22 per share
                    (3,085 )             (3,085 )
Stock options exercised, 51,000 shares
    618                               618  
Proceeds from share sales, 50,178 shares
    895                               895  
Stock compensation
    312                               312  
Tax benefit of stock option exercised
    176                               176  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance at August 31, 2004
  $ 106,985     $ (10 )   $ 194,530     $ 1,607     $ 303,112  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

26


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share data)

                         
    Years ended August 31,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Sales
  $ 585,758     $ 560,775     $ 526,373  
Cost of sales
    392,754       371,959       352,609  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Gross profit
    193,004       188,816       173,764  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    157,810       147,918       130,802  
Amortization
    2,738       2,189       2,015  
Other
    2,139       0       0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income before interest and income taxes
    30,317       38,709       40,947  
Interest expense
    14,427       15,628       17,565  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income before income taxes and minority interest
    15,890       23,081       23,382  
Income tax expense
    5,563       7,729       7,831  
Minority interest
    557       984       1,048  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income
  $ 9,770     $ 14,368     $ 14,503  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income per share
                       
Basic
  $ 0.67     $ 1.00     $ 1.17  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Diluted
  $ 0.67     $ 1.00     $ 1.15  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

27


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands)

                         
    Years Ended August 31,
    2004
  2003
  2002
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
                       
Net income
  $ 9,770     $ 14,368     $ 14,503  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation
    18,639       20,093       20,028  
Amortization
    2,738       2,189       2,015  
Deferred taxes
    (1,512 )     3,619       9,369  
Stock compensation
    312       0       (126 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities - excluding the effect of acquisitions:
                       
Accounts receivable
    (3,524 )     3,392       (3,107 )
Inventories
    (6,018 )     2,807       22,269  
Other current assets
    725       2,761       1,398  
Other assets
    (3,637 )     (4,050 )     (455 )
Accounts payable
    8,755       4,815       (2,897 )
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    105       (4,358 )     (18,457 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities
    26,353       45,636       44,540  
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
                       
Capital expenditures, net of nominal disposals
    (9,884 )     (7,869 )     (15,112 )
Purchase of Tarby
    0       (13,146 )     0  
Proceeds from sales-leaseback arrangements
    0       0       4,905  
Purchase of Romaco, net of cash acquired
    0       0       (18,823 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net cash and cash equivalents used by investing activities
    (9,884 )     (21,015 )     (29,030 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                       
Procees from debt borrowings
    82,658       72,485       29,836  
Payments of long-term debt
    (100,184 )     (93,038 )     (103,275 )
Amended credit agreement fees
    (1,078 )     0       (1,911 )
Proceeds from sale of common stock
    1,513       895       56,992  
Dividend paid
    (3,085 )     (3,150 )     (2,740 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net cash and cash equivalents used by financing activities
    (20,176 )     (22,808 )     (21,098 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
    (3,707 )     1,813       (5,588 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    12,347       10,534       16,122  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 8,640     $ 12,347     $ 10,534  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

28


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTE 1 — SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Robbins & Myers, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our”) and all of its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained. Controlling interest is determined by majority ownership interest and the absence of substantive third-party participation rights. For these consolidated subsidiaries where our ownership is less than 100%, the other shareholders’ interest are shown as Minority Interest. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. All of our operations are conducted in producing and selling original and used equipment and aftermarket parts in the pharmaceutical and healthcare, general industrial and oil and gas exploration and recovery industries.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable relate primarily to customers located in North America and Western Europe and are concentrated in the pharmaceutical, specialty chemical and oil and gas markets. To reduce credit risk, we perform credit investigations prior to accepting an order and, when necessary, require letters of credit to insure payment.

Our estimate for uncollectible accounts receivable is based upon an analysis of our prior collection experience, specific customer creditworthiness and current economic trends within the industries we serve. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation to us (e.g., bankruptcy filings or substantial downgrading of credit ratings), we record a specific reserve to reduce the receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debts based on the length of time that the receivables are past due.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market determined by the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method in the U.S. and the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method outside the U.S. Inventory valuation reserves are determined based on our assessment of the market conditions for our products.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price paid over the value of net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently as impairment indicators arise using a fair market value approach, at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is the operating segment level. We recognize an impairment charge for any amount by which the carrying amount of an operating segment’s goodwill exceeds its fair value. Impairment tests are performed at the end of our first quarter. Losses, if any, resulting from impairment tests will be reflected in operating income in our income statement.

Amortization of other intangible assets is calculated on the straight-line basis using the following lives:

     
Patents and trademarks
  14 to 17 years
Non-compete agreements
  3 to 5 years
Financing costs
  5 years

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation expense is recorded over the estimated useful life of the asset on the straight-line method using the following lives:

     
Land improvements
  20 years
Buildings
  45 years
Machinery and equipment
  3 to 15 years

29


Table of Contents

Our normal policy is to expense repairs and improvements made to capital assets as incurred. In limited circumstances, betterments are capitalized and amortized over the estimated life of the new asset and any remaining value of the old asset is written off. Repairs to machinery and equipment must result in an addition to the useful life of the asset before the costs are capitalized.

Foreign Currency Accounting

Gains and losses resulting from the settlement of a transaction in a currency different from that used to record the transaction are charged or credited to net income when incurred. Adjustments resulting from the translation of non-U.S. financial statements into U.S. dollars are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss for all non-U.S. units.

Product Warranties

Warranty obligations are contingent upon product failure rates, material required for the repairs and service delivery costs. We estimate the warranty accrual based on specific product failures that are known to us plus an additional amount based on the historical relationship of warranty claims to sales.

Changes in our product warranty liability during the year are as follows:

                 
    2004
  2003
    (In thousands)
Balance at beginning of the fiscal year
  $ 9,310     $ 9,405  
Warranties issued
    1,613       1,677  
Settlements made
    (2,593 )     (1,772 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Balance at end of the fiscal year
  $ 8,330     $ 9,310  
 
   
 
     
 
 

Consolidated Income Statement

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $6,688,000, $6,426,000 and $6,214,000, respectively. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue at the time of title passage to our customer. In instances where we have equipment installation obligations, the revenue related to the installation service is deferred until installation is complete. We recognize revenue for certain longer-term contracts based on the percentage of completion method. The percentage of completion method requires estimates of total expected contract revenue and costs. We follow this method since we can make reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and cost applicable to various stages of the contract. Revisions in profit estimates are reflected in the period in which the facts that gave rise to the revision become known.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are provided for all items included in the Consolidated Income Statement regardless of the period when such items are reported for income tax purposes. Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. We have recorded valuation allowances to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized based upon our analysis of estimated future taxable income and establishment of tax strategies. Future taxable income, the results of tax strategies and changes in tax laws could impact these estimates.

Our policy is to provide U.S. income taxes on non-U.S. income when remitted to the U.S. We do not provide U.S. income taxes on the remaining undistributed non-U.S. income, which aggregated $53,700,000 and $45,300,000 at August 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, as it is our intention to maintain our investments in these operations.

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash balances and temporary investments having an original maturity of 90 days or less.

30


Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following methods and assumptions were used by us in estimating the fair value of financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents — The amounts reported approximate market value.

Long-term debt – The market value of our debt is $182,002,000 at August 31, 2004 and $191,603,000 at August 31, 2003. These amounts are based on the terms, interest rates and maturities currently available to us for similar debt instruments.

Foreign exchange contracts — The amounts reported are estimated using quoted market prices for similar instruments.

Common Stock Plans

Common stock plans involving the issuance of stock options are accounted for using the intrinsic method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 (“APB No. 25”) “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and Related Interpretations.” Common stock plans involving the issuance of a variable number of shares based on performance are accounted for as compensatory plans. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the fair value based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
Net income, as reported
  $ 9,770     $ 14,368     $ 14,503  
Deduct: Total Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects
    1,150       1,193       1,154  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Pro forma net income
  $ 8,620     $ 13,175     $ 13,349  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Earnings per share:
                       
Basic — as reported
  $ 0.67     $ 1.00     $ 1.17  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Basic — pro forma
  $ 0.60     $ 0.92     $ 1.08  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Diluted — as reported
  $ 0.67     $ 1.00     $ 1.15  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Diluted — pro forma
  $ 0.60     $ 0.92     $ 1.07  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share is required by SFAS No. 148, and has been determined as if we had accounted for stock options granted subsequent to August 31, 1995 under the fair value method of FASB Statement No. 123. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
Expected volatility of common stock
    32.50 %     33.60 %     33.50 %
Risk free interest rate
    4.70       4.60       4.55  
Dividend yield
    .75       .75       .75  
Expected life of option
    6.90   yrs     6.90   yrs     6.90   yrs
Fair value at grant date
  $ 8.85     $ 7.80     $ 10.15  

Option valuation models, such as the Black-Scholes model, were developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are freely transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because our options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in our opinion, existing models do not provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our stock options.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

We account for derivative instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities,” as amended. This standard requires the recognition of all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value and recognition of the resulting gains or losses as adjustments

31


Table of Contents

to earnings or other comprehensive income. We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as our risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. Our hedging activities are transacted only with a highly-rated institution, reducing the exposure to credit risk in the event of nonperformance. We use derivatives for fair value hedging purposes. For derivative instruments that hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of certain fixed rate debt, designated as fair value hedges, the effective portion of the net gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the fixed rate debt attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in current period earnings. We use swap agreements to convert a portion of fixed rate debt to a floating rate basis, thus hedging for changes in the fair value of the fixed rate debt being hedged. We have determined that this interest rate swap, designated as a fair value hedge, qualifies for treatment under the short-cut method of measuring effectiveness. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, this hedge is determined to be perfectly effective and there is no requirement to periodically evaluate effectiveness.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts are reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

NOTE 2—NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51.” The Interpretation requires the consolidation of entities in which an enterprise absorbs a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual or other financial interest in the entity. Currently, entities are generally consolidated by an enterprise when it has a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority voting interest in the entity. The adoption of Financial Interpretation No. 46 had no effect on our financial statements.

In May 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Staff Position 106-2 (“FAS 106-2”) providing final guidance on accounting for the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“the Act”). We adopted the provisions of FAS 106-2 during the year ended August 31, 2004. This resulted in a reduction in our accumulated postretirement benefit obligations (“APBO”) for the subsidy related to benefits attributed to past services of $3,500,000. The subsidy resulted in a reduction in our current period net periodic postretirement benefit costs for the year ended August 31, 2004 of $200,000. We have not incurred a reduction in current gross benefit payments and expect to receive subsidy payments beginning in fiscal year ended August 31, 2006.

32


Table of Contents

NOTE 3 — BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION

                 
    2004
  2003
    (In thousands)
Accounts receivable
               
Allowances for doubtful accounts
  $ 4,018     $ 3,278  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Inventories
               
FIFO:
               
Finished products
  $ 29,958     $ 36,291  
Work in process
    37,072       24,716  
Raw materials
    47,521       41,297  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    114,551       102,304  
LIFO reserve, U.S. inventories
    (7,073 )     (6,108 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 107,478     $ 96,196  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Non-U.S. inventories at FIFO
  $ 73,960     $ 64,000  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Property, plant and equipment
               
Land and improvements
  $ 18,528     $ 16,289  
Buildings
    90,439       82,576  
Machinery and equipment
    169,537       171,677  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    278,504       270,542  
Less accumulated depreciation
    138,797       128,579  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 139,707     $ 141,963  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Accrued expenses
               
Salaries, wages and payroll taxes
  $ 21,919     $ 19,691  
Customer advances
    18,894       15,385  
Pension benefits
    6,956       5,581  
U.S. and other postretirement benefits
    2,000       2,000  
Warranty costs
    8,330       9,310  
Accrued interest
    4,222       4,000  
Income taxes
    4,620       3,560  
Commissions
    3,640       2,915  
Other
    22,454       22,716  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 93,035     $ 85,158  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Other long-term liabilities
               
German pension liability
  $ 34,142     $ 31,492  
U.S. other postretirement benefits
    11,634       12,192  
U.S. pension liability
    21,189       15,045  
Other
    13,333       13,893  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 80,298     $ 72,622  
 
   
 
     
 
 

33


Table of Contents

NOTE 4 — INCOME STATEMENT INFORMATION

Other

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
    (In thousands)
Plant closure costs
  $ 761     $ 0     $ 0  
CEO retirement costs
    1,378       0       0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 2,139     $ 0     $ 0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

In the second quarter of fiscal 2004, we recorded $1,378,000 of costs associated with the retirement of our former President and CEO. The components of the charge were as follows:

         
    (In thousands)
Liability for retirement payments
  $ 603  
FAS 88 expense for previously unrecognized losses
    153  
Impact of stock option modifications
    312  
Liability for new CEO search fees
    310  
 
   
 
 
Total
  $ 1,378  
 
   
 
 

There have been no changes to the estimates made. The liability for the new CEO search fees has been paid as of August 31, 2004. The liability for retirement payments as of August 31, 2004 is as follows:

         
    (In thousands)
Liability originally recorded
  $ 603  
Payments made
    (390 )
Change in estimate
    0  
 
   
 
 
Liability at August 31, 2004
  $ 213  
 
   
 
 

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 we recorded $761,000 of severance cost for approximately 20 people related to the closure of one of the Reactor Systems facilities in Italy. Actual severance payments made in our fourth quarter were $94,000; therefore, the liability for severance payments as of August 31, 2004 is $667,000.

Minimum lease payments

Future minimum payments, by year and in the aggregate, under non-cancellable operating leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more consisted of the following at August 31, 2004:

         
    (In thousands)
2005
  $ 4,476  
2006
    3,848  
2007
    2,997  
2008
    1,890  
2009
    1,502  
Thereafter
    5,629  
 
   
 
 
 
  $ 20,342  
 
   
 
 

Rental expense for all operating leases in 2004, 2003 and 2002 was approximately $4,721,000, $5,704,000 and $4,740,000, respectively.

NOTE 5 — CASH FLOW STATEMENT INFORMATION

In fiscal 2004, we recorded the following non-cash investing and financing transactions: $2,450,000 increase in deferred tax assets, $7,842,000 increase in long-term liabilities, $838,000 increase in pension intangible asset and $4,554,000 increase in the minimum pension liability related to our pension plans;

34


Table of Contents

and $176,000 increase in common stock and decrease in income tax payable related to the tax benefits of stock options exercised.

In fiscal 2003, we recorded the following non-cash investing and financing transactions: exchange of $40,000,000 of existing 6.50% convertible subordinated notes for $40,000,000 of 8.00% convertible subordinated notes; $632,000 increase in deferred tax assets, $1,723,000 increase in long-term liabilities, $759,000 increase in pension intangible asset and $332,000 increase in the minimum pension liability related to our pension plans; and $156,000 increase in common stock and decrease in income tax payable related to the tax benefits of stock options exercised.

In fiscal 2002, we recorded the following non-cash investing and financing transactions: $16,050,000 of debt issued in connection with the acquisition of Romaco; $3,724,000 increase in deferred tax assets, $11,987,000 increase in long-term liabilities and $8,263,000 increase in the minimum pension liability related to our pension plans; and $724,000 increase in common stock and decrease in income tax payable related to the tax benefits of stock options exercised.

Supplemental cash flow information consisted of the following:

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
            (in thousands)        
Interest paid
  $ 14,205     $ 15,696     $ 17,789  
Taxes paid – net of refunds
    6,015       3,829       1,670  

NOTE 6—GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, by operating segment, are as follows:

                                 
Segment
  Pharmaceutical
  Energy
  Industrial
  Total
    (In thousands)
Balance as of September 1, 2002
  $ 161,138     $ 68,098     $ 42,712     $ 271,948  
Goodwill acquired during the period
    0       0       9,052       9,052  
Translation adjustments and other
    12,155       1,430       319       13,904  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance as of August 31, 2003
    173,293       69,528       52,083       294,904  
Goodwill acquired during the period
    0       0       202       202  
Translation adjustments and other
    11,350       710       0       12,060  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance as of August 31, 2004
  $ 184,643     $ 70,238     $ 52,285     $ 307,166  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Information regarding our other intangible assets is as follows:

                                                 
    2004
  2003
    Carrying   Accumulated           Carrying   Accumulated    
    Amount
  Amortization
  Net
  Amount
  Amortization
  Net
    (In thousands)
Patents and Trademarks
  $ 8,921     $ 5,492     $ 3,429     $ 10,927     $ 5,124     $ 5,803  
Non-compete Agreements
    8,750       5,327       3,423       10,790       8,274       2,516  
Financing Costs
    8,592       5,629       2,963       7,453       4,376       3,077  
Pension Intangible
    4,643       0       4,643       3,805       0       3,805  
Other
    6,131       4,820       1,311       5,234       4,591       643  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 37,037     $ 21,268     $ 15,769     $ 38,209     $ 22,365     $ 15,844  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

We estimate that amortization expense will be approximately $2,500,000 for each of the next five years.

35


Table of Contents

NOTE 7 — LONG-TERM DEBT

                 
    2004
  2003
    (in thousands)
Senior debt:
               
Revolving credit loan
  $ 5,052     $ 12,617  
Senior notes
    100,000       100,000  
Other
    11,652       18,297  
8.00% convertible subordinated notes
    40,000       40,000  
10.00% subordinated notes
    24,998       22,689  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total debt
    181,702       193,603  
Less current portion
    8,333       7,319  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Long-term debt
  $ 173,369     $ 186,284  
 
   
 
     
 
 

Our Bank Credit Agreement (“Agreement”) provides that we may borrow on a revolving credit basis up to a maximum of $125,000,000. All outstanding amounts under the Agreement are due and payable on October 7, 2006. Interest is variable based upon formulas tied to LIBOR or prime, at our option, and is payable at least quarterly. At August 31, 2004, the weighted average interest rate for all amounts outstanding was 4.07%. Indebtedness under the Agreement is unsecured, except for guarantees by our U.S. subsidiaries, the pledge of the stock of our U.S. subsidiaries and the pledge of the stock of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries. Under this Agreement and other lines of credit, we have $120,000,000 of unused borrowing capacity. However, due to our financial covenants and outstanding standby letters of credit, we could only incur additional indebtedness of $11,600,000. We have $23,459,000 of standby letters of credit outstanding at August 31, 2004. These standby letters of credit are used as security for advance payments received from customers and future payments to our vendors.

We have $100,000,000 of Senior Notes (“Senior Notes”) issued in two series. Series A in the principal amount of $70,000,000 has an interest rate of 6.76% and is due May 1, 2008, and Series B in the principal amount of $30,000,000 has an interest rate of 6.84% and is due May 1, 2010. Interest is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1.

The above agreements have certain restrictive covenants including limitations on cash dividends, treasury stock purchases and capital expenditures and thresholds for interest coverage and leverage ratios. The amount of cash dividends and treasury stock purchases, other than in relation to stock option exercises, we may incur in each fiscal year is restricted to the greater of $3,500,000 or 50% of our consolidated net income for the immediately preceding fiscal year, plus a portion of any unused amounts from the preceding fiscal year.

We have $24,998,000 of 10.00% Subordinated Notes (“Subordinated Notes”) denominated in euro with the former owner of Romaco. The Subordinated Notes are due in 2006 and interest is payable quarterly.

We have $40,000,000 of 8.00% Convertible Subordinated Notes Due 2008 (“8.00% Convertible Subordinated Notes”). The 8.00% Convertible Subordinated Notes are due on January 31, 2008, bear interest at 8.00%, payable semi-annually on March 1 and September 1 and are convertible into common stock at a rate of $22.50 per share. Holders may convert at any time until maturity. The 8.00% Convertible Subordinated Notes are redeemable at our option at any time on or after March 1, 2004, at a redemption price (a) prior to or on March 1, 2005, equal to 102% of the principal amount, and (b) after March 1, 2005, equal to 100% of the principal amount.

Our other debt primarily consists of unsecured non-U.S. bank lines of credit with interest rates ranging from 4.00% to 8.00%.

We have entered into an interest rate swap agreement. The interest rate swap agreement utilized by us effectively modifies our exposure to interest rate risk by converting our fixed rate debt to floating rate debt. This agreement involves the receipt of fixed rate amounts in exchange for floating rate interest payments

36


Table of Contents

over the life of the agreement without an exchange of underlying principal amounts. The mark-to-market values of both the fair value hedging instrument and the underlying debt obligation were equal and recorded as offsetting gains and losses in current period earnings. The fair value hedge qualifies for treatment under the short-cut method of measuring effectiveness. As a result, there is no impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness. The interest rate swap agreement totals $30,000,000, expires in 2004 and allows us to receive an interest rate of 6.76% and pay an interest rate based on LIBOR.

Aggregate principal payments of long-term debt, for the five years subsequent to August 31, 2004, are as follows:

         
    (In thousands)
2005
  $ 8,333  
2006
    29,119  
2007
    3,702  
2008
    110,208  
2009
    133  
2010 and thereafter
    30,207  
 
   
 
 
Total
  $ 181,702  
 
   
 
 

NOTE 8 — RETIREMENT BENEFITS

We sponsor two defined contribution plans covering most U.S. salaried employees and certain U.S. hourly employees. Contributions are made to the plans based on a percentage of eligible amounts contributed by participating employees. We also sponsor several defined benefit plans covering all U.S. employees and certain non-U.S. employees. Benefits are based on years of service and employees’ compensation or stated amounts for each year of service. Our funding policy is consistent with the funding requirements of applicable regulations. At August 31, 2004 and 2003, pension investments included 311,700 shares of our common stock.

In addition to pension benefits, we provide health care and life insurance benefits for certain of our retired U.S. employees. Our policy is to fund the cost of these benefits as claims are paid.

Retirement and other post-retirement plan costs are as follows:

                         
    Pension Benefits
    2004
  2003
  2002
    (In thousands)
Service costs
  $ 3,825     $ 3,905     $ 3,602  
Interest cost
    8,341       8,250       7,278  
Expected return on plan assets
    (6,535 )     (6,244 )     (7,049 )
Amortization of prior service cost
    388       752       593  
Amortization of transition obligation
    (186 )     (173 )     (202 )
Recognized net actuarial losses (gains)
    1,266       815       (148 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 7,099     $ 7,305     $ 4,074  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Defined contribution cost
  $ 1,120     $ 1,057     $ 1,064  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
                         
    Other Benefits
    2004
  2003
  2002
    (In thousands)
Service cost
  $ 310     $ 249     $ 297  
Interest cost
    1,546       1,713       1,694  
Net amortization
    813       702       609  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net peridoc benefit cost
  $ 2,669     $ 2,664     $ 2,600  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

37


Table of Contents

The benefit obligation, funded status and amounts recorded in the balance sheet at August 31, (measurement date) are as follows:

                                 
    Pension Benefits
  Other Benefits
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
    (In thousands)
Change in benefit obligation:
                               
Beginning of year
  $ 136,638     $ 128,067     $ 25,617     $ 25,343  
Service cost
    3,825       3,905       310       249  
Interest cost
    8,341       8,250       1,546       1,713  
Plan amendments
    164       346       0       104  
Currency exchange rate impact
    6,040       3,993       0       0  
Actuarial losses
    4,677       407       1,718       1,110  
Curtailment
    0       0       0       (16 )
Benefit payments
    (9,003 )     (8,330 )     (3,227 )     (2,886 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
End of year
  $ 150,682     $ 136,638     $ 25,964     $ 25,617  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Change in plan assets:
                               
Beginning of year
  $ 77,470     $ 71,898     $ 0     $ 0  
Currency exchange rate impact
    2,107       226       0       0  
Actual return
    2,758       4,299       0       0  
Company contributions
    8,204       9,377       3,227       2,886  
Benefit payments
    (9,003 )     (8,330 )     (3,227 )     (2,886 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
End of year
  $ 81,536     $ 77,470     $ 0     $ 0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Funded status
  $ (69,146 )   $ (59,168 )   $ (25,964 )   $ (25,617 )
Unrecognized net actuarial losses
    33,555       25,770       10,271       9,154  
Unrecognized transition obligation
    (373 )     (491 )     0       0  
Unamortized prior service cost
    3,250       3,540       2,059       2,271  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Amount recognized
  $ (32,714 )   $ (30,349 )   $ (13,634 )   $ (14,192 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Recorded as follows:
                               
Accrued expenses
  $ (6,956 )   $ (5,581 )   $ (2,000 )   $ (2,000 )
Other long-term liabilities
    (55,331 )     (46,537 )     (11,634 )     (12,192 )
Other assets
    1,413       1,309       0       0  
Intangible assets
    4,643       3,805       0       0  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    23,517       16,655       0       0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ (32,714 )   $ (30,349 )   $ (13,634 )   $ (14,192 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Deferred tax liability on accumulated other comprehensive loss
  $ (7,975 )   $ (5,667 )   $ 0     $ 0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Pension plans with accumulated (“ABO”) and projected (“PBO”) benefit obligations in excess of plan assets:

                 
    2004
  2003
    (In thousands)
Accumulated benefit obligation
  $ 147,351     $ 132,018  
Projected benefit obligation
    150,682       136,638  
Plan assets
    81,536       77,470  

38


Table of Contents

In 2004 and 2003, $36,444,000 and $33,504,000, respectively, of the unfunded ABO and $38,189,000 and $35,348,000, respectively, of the unfunded PBO related to our pension plan for our German operation. Funding of pension obligations is not required in Germany.

The weighted allocations of pension plan assets at August 31, 2004 and 2003 are shown in the following table.

                 
    2004
  2003
Equity securities
    48 %     47 %
Debt securities
    46       51  
Cash and cash equivalents
    6       2  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    100 %     100 %
 
   
 
     
 
 

At August 31, 2004, our target allocation percentages for plan assets were approximately 60% equity securities and 40% debt securities. The targets may be adjusted periodically to reflect current market conditions and trends as well as inflation levels, interest rates and the trend thereof, and economic and monetary policy. The objective underlying this allocation is to achieve a long-term rate of return of inflation plus 6%.

The expected long-term rates of return on plan assets for purposes of determining pension expense were 8.5% in 2004 and 2003 and 9.0% in 2002. We will use an 8.25% rate in 2005. Expected rates of return are developed based on the target allocation of debt and equity securities and on the historical returns on these types of investments judgmentally adjusted to reflect current expectations based on historical experience of the plan’s investment managers. In evaluating future returns on equity securities, the existing portfolio is stratified to separately consider large and small capitalization investments as well as international and other types of securities.

We expect to make future cash contributions to our benefit plans as follows:

                 
    Pension Benefits
  Other Benefits
    (In thousands)
2005
  $ 10,500     $ 2,600  
2006
    10,500       2,500  
2007
    10,400       2,400  
2008
    10,500       2,500  
2009
    10,500       2,500  
2010-2014
  $ 54,015     $ 11,500  

39


Table of Contents

The actuarial weighted average assumptions used to determine plan liabilities at August 31, are as follows:

                                 
    Pension Benefits
  Other Benefits
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
Weighted average assumptions:
                               
Discount rate
    6.00 %     6.50 %     6.00 %     6.50 %
Expected return on plan assets
    8.25       8.50       N/A       N/A  
Rate of compensation increase
    4.50       4.50       N/A       N/A  
Health care cost increase
    N/A       N/A       11.0 - 5.0 %     9.0 - 5.0 %
Health care cost grading period
    N/A       N/A     12 years   4 years

The actuarial weighted average assumptions used to determine plan costs are as follows:

                                 
    Pension Benefits
  Other Benefits
    2004
  2003
  2004
  2003
Discount rate
    6.50 %     6.50 %     6.50 %     6.50 %
Expected return on plan assets
    8.50       8.50       N/A       N/A  
Rate of compensation increase
    4.50       4.50       N/A       N/A  
Health care cost increase
    N/A       N/A       9.0 - 5.0 %     10.0 - 5.0 %
Health care cost grading period
    N/A       N/A     4 years   5 years

The assumed health care trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care benefits. A one-percentage point change in assumed health care rate would have the following effects:

                 
    Increase
  Decrease
    (In thousands)
Service and interest cost
  $ 70     $ (66 )
Postretirement benefit obligation
    2,241       (2,019 )

40


Table of Contents

NOTE 9 — INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.

                 
    2004
  2003
    (In thousands)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities
               
Assets:
               
Postretirement benefit obligations
  $ 5,177     $ 5,360  
Net operating loss carryforwards
    0       679  
U.S. credit carryforward
    4,901       5,071  
Other liabilities
    2,147       1,430  
Inventory allowances
    3,080       3,476  
Warranty reserve
    1,580       2,074  
Insurance reserve
    913       797  
Customer advance payments
    1,259       0  
Research and development costs
    1,126       0  
Pension benefits
    9,662       6,250  
Other items
    486       0  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    30,331       25,137  
Less valuation allowances
    0       726  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    30,331       24,411  
Liabilities:
               
Tax depreciation in excess of book depreciation
    6,444       8,373  
Goodwill and purchased asset basis differences
    19,880       15,441  
Other items
    435       988  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    26,759       24,802  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
  $ 3,572     $ (391 )
 
   
 
     
 
 

The credit carryforwards begin to expire in fiscal 2007. The reduction in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance in fiscal 2004 is a result of credit carryforwards utilized in fiscal 2004.

41


Table of Contents

Expense

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
    (In thousands)
Current:
                       
U.S. federal
  $ 445     $ (627 )   $ (6,751 )
Non-U.S.
    6,589       4,799       5,877  
U.S. state
    41       (62 )     (664 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
    7,075       4,110       (1,538 )
Deferred:
                       
U.S. federal
    (1,211 )     1,505       6,863  
Non-U.S.
    (188 )     1,966       1,820  
U.S. state
    (113 )     148       686  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
    (1,512 )     3,619       9,369  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 5,563     $ 7,729     $ 7,831  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Tax expense included in minority interest
  $ 300     $ 530     $ 395  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Non-U.S. pretax income
  $ 13,668     $ 20,935     $ 23,521  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

A summary of the differences between the effective income tax rate attributable to operations and the statutory rate is as follows:

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
U.S. statutory rate
    35.0 %     35.0 %     35.0 %
U.S. state income taxes, net of U.S. federal tax benefit
    (0.2 )     0.2       0.0  
Extraterritorial income deduction
    0.0       (1.5 )     (1.5 )
Non-U.S. tax higher (lower) than U.S. tax rates
    1.4       0.6       (0.8 )
Other items — net
    (1.2 )     (0.8 )     0.8  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
    35.0 %     33.5 %     33.5 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

NOTE 10 — COMMON STOCK

We sponsor a long-term incentive stock plan to provide for the granting of stock-based compensation to officers and other key employees. In addition, we sponsor stock option and stock compensation plans for non-employee directors. Under the plans, the stock option price per share may not be less than the fair market value per share as of the date of grant. For officers and other key employees, outstanding grants become exercisable over a three-year period, while options for non-employee directors are immediately exercisable. Proceeds from the sale of stock issued under option arrangements are credited to common stock. We make no charges or credits against earnings with respect to these options.

42


Table of Contents

Summaries of amounts issued under the stock option plans are presented in the following tables.

Stock option activity

                 
            Weighted-
    Stock   Average Option Price
    Options
  Per Share
Outstanding at September 1, 2001
    1,020,134     $ 23.12  
Granted
    222,500       25.12  
Exercised
    (167,500 )     15.07  
Canceled
    (333 )     20.88  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Outstanding at August 31, 2002
    1,074,801       24.78  
Granted
    187,500       19.12  
Exercised
    (36,000 )     9.92  
Canceled
    (97,000 )     28.48  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Outstanding at August 31, 2003
    1,129,301       24.00  
Granted
    209,000       21.76  
Exercised
    (51,000 )     12.03  
Canceled/Expired
    (8,800 )     24.12  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Outstanding at August 31, 2004
    1,278,501     $ 24.11  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
 
Exercisable stock options at year-end
               
2002
            860,363  
2003
            788,159  
2004
            914,926  
Shares available for grant at year-end
               
2002
            537,700  
2003
            350,200  
2004
            141,200  

Components of outstanding stock options at August 31, 2004

                           
              Weighted-    
  Range of           Average   Weighted-
  Exercise   Number   Contract Life   Average
  Price
  Outstanding
  in Years
  Exercise Price
$
7.75–23.00
    608,334       7.83     $ 13.19  
 
23.75 – 39.50
    670,167       5.68       27.23  
 
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
$
7.75–39.50
    1,278,501       6.70     $ 24.11  
 
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Components of exercisable stock options at August 31, 2004

                   
  Range of           Weighted-
  Exercise   Number   Average
  Price
  Exercisable
  Exercise Price
$
7.75–23.00
    301,092     $ 20.53  
 
23.75 – 39.50
    613,834       27.42  
 
 
   
 
     
 
 
$
7.75–39.50
    914,926     $ 25.15  
$
 
   
 
     
 
 

We also sponsor a long-term incentive stock plan. Under this plan, selected participants receive performance units which convert into a variable number of restricted shares based on a three year measurement of how favorably the total return on our shares compares to the total shareholder return of selected peer companies (“Group”). The restricted shares earned range from 75% to 200% of the

43


Table of Contents

performance units awarded. The 75% threshold is earned when our return is at the 50th percentile of total shareholder return of the Group and 200% is earned when our return is at the 80th percentile or greater. No restricted shares are earned if our return is less than the median return of the Group. Restricted shares earned under the program are issued to the participants at the end of the three-year measurement period and are subject to forfeit if the participant leaves our employment within the following two years. For the performance period ended August 31, 2004, no amounts were earned.

Total after tax compensation expense (income) included in net income for all stock based awards was 216,000, zero and ($84,000) for fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

NOTE 11 — NET INCOME PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
    (In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
                       
Basic:
                       
Net Income
  $ 9,770     $ 14,368     $ 14,503  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                       
Convertible debt interest
    1,920       2,238       2,328  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income attributable to diluted shares
  $ 11,690     $ 16,606     $ 16,831  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Denominator:
                       
Basic:
                       
Weighted average shares
    14,478       14,368       12,379  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                       
Convertible debt
    1,778       2,090       2,190  
Dilutive options and restricted shares
    29       34       119  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Diluted
    16,285       16,492       14,688  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income per share:
                       
Basic:
  $ 0.67     $ 1.00     $ 1.17  
Diluted:
  $ 0.67     $ 1.00     $ 1.15  

NOTE 12 — BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

Our operations are aggregated into three reportable business segments: Pharmaceutical, Energy and Industrial. Our Pharmaceutical segment includes our Reactor Systems and Romaco businesses and is primarily focused on the pharmaceutical and healthcare industries. Our Reactor Systems business designs, manufactures and markets primary processing equipment including glass-lined reactors and storage vessels. Our Romaco business designs, manufactures and markets secondary processing, dosing, filling, printing and security equipment. Our Energy segment designs, manufactures and markets equipment and systems used in oil and gas exploration and recovery. Our equipment and systems include hydraulic drilling power sections, down-hole pumps and a broad line of ancillary equipment, such as rod guides, rod and tubing rotators, wellhead systems, pipeline closure products and valves. Our Industrial segment is comprised of our Moyno, Tarby, Chemineer and Edlon businesses, which design, manufacture and market products that are used in specialty chemical, wastewater treatment and a variety of other industrial applications. The primary products are progressing cavity pump products, mixing and turbine agitation equipment, and fluoropolymer-lined products and accessories.

We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on Income before Interest and Taxes (“EBIT”). Identifiable assets by business segment include all assets directly identified with those operations. Corporate assets consist mostly of cash and intangible assets. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies except that we account for U.S. inventory on a FIFO basis at the segment level compared to a LIFO basis at the consolidated level.

44


Table of Contents

The following tables provide information about our reportable business segments.

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
    (In thousands)
Unaffiliated Customer Sales:
                       
Pharmaceutical
  $ 343,047     $ 342,415     $ 319,412  
Energy
    115,884       95,487       91,381  
Industrial (1)
    126,827       122,873       115,580  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 585,758     $ 560,775     $ 526,373  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Intersegment Sales:
                       
Pharmaceutical
  $ 805     $ 1,136     $ 934  
Energy
    0       0       0  
Industrial (1)
    0       0       0  
Corporate and Eliminations
    (805 )     (1,136 )     (934 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Depreciation and Amortization:
                       
Pharmaceutical
  $ 9,573     $ 10,562     $ 10,194  
Energy
    5,493       5,307       5,534  
Industrial (1)
    4,536       5,065       5,366  
Corporate and Eliminations
    1,775       1,348       949  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 21,377     $ 22,282     $ 22,043  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
EBIT:
                       
Pharmaceutical
  $ 10,317   (3)   $ 21,401     $ 27,895  
Energy
    27,424       20,941       18,773  
Industrial (1)
    8,349       8,791       5,279  
Corporate and Eliminations
    (15,773 ) (2)     (12,424 )     (11,000 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 30,317     $ 38,709     $ 40,947  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Identifiable Assets:
                       
Pharmaceutical
  $ 437,602     $ 416,215     $ 405,319  
Energy
    138,815       134,167       131,374  
Industrial (1)
    132,441       128,754       114,926  
Corporate and Eliminations
    24,384       25,320       28,306  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 733,242     $ 704,456     $ 679,925  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Capital Expenditures:
                       
Pharmaceutical
  $ 2,536     $ 3,666     $ 8,761  
Energy
    3,805       2,253       682  
Industrial (1)
    3,506       1,878       5,505  
Corporate and Eliminations
    37       72       164  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 9,884     $ 7,869     $ 15,112  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

45


Table of Contents

Information about our operations in different geographical regions is presented below. Our primary operations are in the U.S. and Europe. Sales are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer.

                         
    2004
  2003
  2002
    (In thousands)
Sales (1)
                       
United States
  $ 218,407     $ 204,982     $ 209,713  
Europe
    206,033       218,442       219,949  
Other North America
    54,046       51,889       42,834  
South America
    22,730       20,970       20,230  
Asia and Australia
    84,542       64,492       33,647  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 585,758     $ 560,775     $ 526,373  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Identifiable Assets (1)
                       
United States
  $ 308,118     $ 309,243     $ 299,943  
Europe
    318,844       294,659       290,220  
Other North America
    40,169       37,968       33,340  
South America
    9,462       9,088       4,338  
Asia
    32,265       28,178       23,778  
Corporate
    24,384       25,320       28,306  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 733,242     $ 704,456     $ 679,925  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

(1)   Includes the operations of Tarby from the acquisition date of November 15, 2002.
 
(2)   Fiscal 2004 includes costs of $1,378,000 related to the retirement of our former President and CEO.
 
(3)   Fiscal 2004 includes severance costs of $761,000 related to the consolation of our Reactor Systems business in Italy.

46


Table of Contents

NOTE 13 — QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED)

                                         
    2004 Quarters
       
    1st
  2nd
  3rd
  4th
  Total
    (In thousands, except per share data)
Sales
  $ 132,482     $ 142,217     $ 152,464     $ 158,595     $ 585,758  
Gross profit
    43,466       45,081       50,935       53,522       193,004  
EBIT
    7,185       4,658       9,405       9,069       30,317  
Income before income taxes and minority interest
    3,487       1,016       5,884       5,503       15,890  
Net income
    2,139       320       3,814       3,497       9,770  
Net income per share:
                                       
Basic
  $ 0.15     $ 0.02     $ 0.26     $ 0.24     $ 0.67  
Diluted
    0.15       0.02       0.26       0.24       0.67  
Weighted average common shares:
                                       
Basic
    14,441       14,457       14,496       14,519       14,478  
Diluted
    16,272       16,260       16,309       16,308       16,285  
                                         
    2003 Quarters
       
    1st
  2nd
  3rd
  4th
  Total
    (In thousands, except per share data)
Sales
  $ 124,828     $ 134,155     $ 144,921     $ 156,871     $ 560,775  
Gross profit
    41,548       45,247       49,139       52,882       188,816  
EBIT
    7,043       8,850       11,439       11,377       38,709  
Income before income taxes and minority interest
    3,185       4,998       7,439       7,459       23,081  
Net income
    1,990       3,043       4,411       4,924       14,368  
Net income per share:
                                       
Basic
  $ 0.14     $ 0.21     $ 0.31     $ 0.34     $ 1.00  
Diluted
    0.14       0.21       0.30       0.33       1.00  
Weighted average common shares:
                                       
Basic
    14,344       14,358       14,373       14,397       14,368  
Diluted
    16,568       16,643       16,534       16,224       16,492  

47


Table of Contents

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Based on a recent evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter of our year ended August 31, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting except that we identified at one of our business units significant weaknesses in the internal controls relating to the estimation of inventory reserves and calculation of certain accrued liabilities that could have lead to a material misstatement of our financial statements. After review, the estimation and calculation were appropriately revised. Our management discussed with the audit committee of our board of directors and our independent auditors these internal control weaknesses and the resulting impact these revisions had on our August 31, 2004 financial statements. We have determined that the revisions had no material impact on our August 31, 2004 financial statements.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

48


Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Information Concerning Directors and Executive Officers

The information required by this item relating to directors and executive officers of the Company, the Company’s Audit Committee and Section 16(a) Compliance is incorporated herein by reference to that part of the information under “Election of Directors,” “Security Ownership” and “Section 16 Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders scheduled to be held on December 8, 2004. Certain information concerning executive officers of the Company appears under “Executive Officers of the Registrant” at Part 1 of this Report.

Code of Ethics

The Company has a Code of Business Conduct (the “Code”) that applies to all employees, executive officers and directors of the Company. A copy of the Code is posted on the Company’s website. The Code also serves as a code of ethics for the Company’s chief executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller, or any person performing similar functions (the “Senior Officers”). Any waiver of any provision of the Code granted to a Senior Officer may only be granted by the full Board of Directors or its Audit Committee. If a waiver is granted, information concerning the waiver will be posted on the Company’s website www.robbinsmyers.com for a period of 12 months.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that at least one person serving on its audit committee is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K. Mr. Dale L. Medford, a member of the audit committee, is an audit committee financial expert and is independent as that term is used in the Item 7(d) (3) (iv) of the Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 8, 2004.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 8, 2004.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 8, 2004.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on December 8, 2004.

49


Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

     (a) (1) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following consolidated financial statements of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and its subsidiaries are at Item 8 hereof.

Consolidated Balance Sheet — August 31, 2004 and 2003.

Consolidated Income Statement - Years ended August 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002.

Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity Statement - Years ended August 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002.

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement - Years ended August 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     (a) (2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

     (a) (3) EXHIBITS. See INDEX to EXHIBITS.

50


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Robbins & Myers, Inc. has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 4th day of November, 2004.
         
  ROBBINS & MYERS, INC.
 
 
  BY /s/ Peter C. Wallace    
              Peter C. Wallace   
              President and Chief Executive Officer   
 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Robbins & Myers, Inc. and in the capacities and on the date indicated:

         
NAME
  TITLE
  DATE
/s/ Peter C. Wallace

Peter C. Wallace
  Director, President and
Chief Executive Officer
  November 4, 2004
/s/ Kevin J. Brown

Kevin J. Brown
  Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
  November 4, 2004
/s/ Thomas J. Schockman

Thomas J. Schockman
  Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
  November 4, 2004
*Thomas P. Loftis   Chairman Of Board   November 4, 2004
*Daniel W. Duval   Director   November 4, 2004
*David T. Gibbons   Director   November 4, 2004
*Robert J. Kegerreis   Director   November 4, 2004
*William D. Manning   Director   November 4, 2004
*Dale L. Medford   Director   November 4, 2004
*Jerome F. Tatar   Director   November 4, 2004

*The undersigned, by signing his name hereto, executes this Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2004 pursuant to powers of attorney executed by the above-named persons and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
         
     
  /s/ Peter C. Wallace    
  Peter C. Wallace   
  Their Attorney-in-fact   

51


Table of Contents

         

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

                                         
            Additions
           
            Charged   Charged            
    Balance at   to Costs   to Other           Balance at
    Beginning   and   Accounts-   Deductions-   End of
Description
  of Period
  Expenses
  Describe
  Describe
  Period
Year Ended August 31, 2004
                                       
Allowances and reserves deducted from assets:
                                       
Uncollectible and reserves deducted from assets
  $ 3,278     $ 1,099     $ 0     $ 359  (1)   $ 4,018  
Inventory obsolescence
    22,336       1,664       0       3,349  (2)     20,651  
Other reserves:
                                       
Warranty claims
    9,310       1,613       0       2,593  (3)     8,330  
Current & L-T insurance reserves
    2,116       762       0       675  (5)     2,203  
Restructure reserves
    0       761       0       94  (6)     667  
Year Ended August 31, 2003
                                       
Allowances and reserves deducted from assets:
                                       
Uncollectible and reserves deducted from assets
  $ 2,717     $ 807     $ 0     $ 246  (1)   $ 3,278  
Inventory obsolescence
    20,875       4,000       0       2,539  (2)     22,336  
Other reserves:
                                       
Warranty claims
    9,405       1,677       0       1,772  (3)     9,310  
Current & L-T insurance reserves
    2,247       2,619       0       2,750  (5)     2,116  
Year Ended August 31, 2002
                                       
Allowances and reserves deducted from assets:
                                       
Uncollectible and reserves deducted from assets
  $ 3,332     $ 826     $ 0     $ 1,441  (1)   $ 2,717  
Inventory obsolescence
    19,065       2,314       6,094  (4)     6,598  (2)     20,875  
Other reserves:
                                       
Warranty claims
    10,176       2,219       0       2,990  (3)     9,405  
Restructuring liabilities
    155       (155 )     0       0       0  
Current & L-T insurance reserves
    2,484       2,622       0       2,859  (5)     2,247  
     
Note (1)
  Represents accounts receivable written off against the reserve.
 
Note (2)
  Inventory items scrapped and written off against the reserve.
 
Note (3)
  Warranty cost incurred applied against the reserve.
 
Note (4)
  Amount due to acquisition of Romaco. This amount reduced the opening inventory balance at Romaco to net realization value less a reasonable profit margin for our selling efforts.
 
Note (5)
  Spending against casualty reserve.
 
Note (6)
  Spending against restructure reserve.

52


Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

         
(3)
  ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS:    
 
       
 
3.1 Amended Articles of Incorporation of Robbins & Myers, Inc. were filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 1998
  *
 
       
 
3.2 Code of Regulations of Robbins & Myers, Inc. was filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2001
  *
 
       
(4)
 
INSTRUMENTS DEFINING THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY
HOLDERS, INCLUDING INDENTURES:
   
 
       
 
4.1 Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated October 7, 2003 among Robbins & Myers, Inc., the Lenders named therein, Bank One, N.A. as Administrative Agent and Issuing Bank, Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Co-Syndication Agent, National City Bank, as Co-Syndication Agent, Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agent and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Co-Documentation Agent and Issuing Bank, was filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year Ended August 31, 2003
  *
 
       
 
4.2 Amendment No.1 dated April 21, 2004 to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of October 7, 2003, by and among Robbins & Myers Inc., Robbins & Myers Finance B.V., and Bank One, N.A., individually and as administrative agent, and the other financial institutions named therein was filed as exhibit 10.1 to our Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2004.
  C

53


Table of Contents

         
 
4.3 Amended and Restated Pledge and Security Agreement between Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Bank One, Dayton, N.A., dated May 15, 1998 was filed as Exhibit 4.2 to our Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2003.
  *
 
       
 
4.4 Form of $100 million senior note agreement dated May 1, 1998 was filed as Exhibit 4.1 to our Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 1998
  *
 
       
 
4.5 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 10.00% Subordinated Note Due 2006 in the principal amount of Euro 2,452,000, dated August 31, 2001
  R
 
       
 
4.6 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 10.00% Subordinated Notes Due 2007 in the principal amount of Euro 18,190,662, dated February 28, 2002
  R
 
       
(10)
  MATERIAL CONTRACTS:    
 
       
 
10.1 Robbins & Myers, Inc. Cash Balance Pension Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective as of October 1, 1999) was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2001
  */M
 
       
 
10.2 Robbins & Myers, Inc. Employee Savings Plan as amended through August 31, 2000 was filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2000
  */M
 
       
 
10.3 Robbins & Myers, Inc. Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan adopted February 2000 and Amendment No. 1 to such Plan adopted August 2000 was filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2000
  */M
 
       
 
10.4 Robbins & Myers, Inc. Executive Supplemental Pension Plan adopted July 2000 was filed as Exhibit 10.6 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2000
  */M
 
       
 
10.5 Form of Indemnification Agreement between Robbins & Myers, Inc., and each director was filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2001
  */M

54


Table of Contents

         
 
10.6 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1994 Directors Stock Compensation Plan was filed as Exhibit 10.6 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2001
  */M
 
       
 
10.7 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1994 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan as amended was filed as Exhibit 10.11 to our Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 1996
  */M
 
       
 
10.8 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors was filed as Exhibit 10.12 to our Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 1996
  */M
 
       
 
10.9 Robbins & Myers, Inc. Senior Executive Annual Cash Bonus Plan was filed as Exhibit 10.13 to our Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 1996
  */M
 
       
 
10.10 Salary Continuation Agreement between Robbins & Myers, Inc. and Peter C. Wallace, dated May 21, 2004 was filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter Ended May 31, 2004
  */M
 
       
 
10.11 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1999 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan was filed as Exhibit 4.3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-35856)
  */M

55


Table of Contents

         
 
       
(14)
  CODE OF CONDUCT    
 
       
 
14.1 Robbins & Myers, Inc. Code of Business Conduct was Filed as Exhibit 14.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2003
  *
 
       
(21)
  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT    
 
       
  21.1 Subsidiaries of Robbins & Myers, Inc.   F
 
       
(23)
  CONSENTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL    
 
       
  23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP   F
 
       
(24)
  POWER OF ATTORNEY    
 
       
 
24.1 Powers of Attorney of any person who signed this Report on Form 10-K on behalf of another pursuant to a Power of attorney
  F
 
       
(31)
  RULE 13A-14(A) CERTIFICATIONS    
 
       
  31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) CEO Certification   F
  31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) CFO Certification   F
 
       
(32)
  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS    
 
       
  32.1 Section 1350 CEO Certification   F
  32.2 Section 1350 CFO Certification   F

“F”   Indicates Exhibit is being filed with this Report.
 
“*”   Indicates that Exhibit is incorporated by reference in this Report from a previous filing with the Commission.
 
“R”   Instrument with respect to indebtedness that does not exceed 10% of the Company’s total assets which is not being filed, but will be furnished to the Commission upon its request.
 
“M”   Indicates management contract or compensatory arrangement.
 
“C”   Confidential treatment requested as to certain portions, which have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

56