UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-Q
þ
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 Commission File No. 0-13147
or
o
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
LESCO, Inc.
Ohio (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
34-0904517 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
15885 Sprague Road Strongsville, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices) |
44136 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code
(440) 783-9250
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ
Number of Common Shares outstanding as of November 1, 2004: 8,709,694
-1-
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LESCO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - UNAUDITED
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 152,655 | $ | 147,721 | $ | 436,888 | $ | 414,731 | ||||||||
Cost of product |
(99,893 | ) | (97,120 | ) | (289,374 | ) | (275,561 | ) | ||||||||
Distribution cost |
(12,106 | ) | (11,891 | ) | (36,205 | ) | (37,144 | ) | ||||||||
Gross profit on sales |
40,656 | 38,710 | 111,309 | 102,026 | ||||||||||||
Selling expense |
(23,450 | ) | (20,455 | ) | (68,361 | ) | (63,456 | ) | ||||||||
General & administrative expense |
(7,085 | ) | (7,301 | ) | (20,946 | ) | (21,874 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate relocation expense |
(4,940 | ) | | (4,940 | ) | | ||||||||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
(1,350 | ) | | (1,350 | ) | | ||||||||||
Merchant discounts and provision for
doubtful accounts |
(2,678 | ) | (684 | ) | (6,859 | ) | (2,425 | ) | ||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
62 | (130 | ) | (663 | ) | (420 | ) | |||||||||
Other expense |
(50 | ) | (33 | ) | (242 | ) | (637 | ) | ||||||||
Other income |
94 | 192 | 464 | 1,258 | ||||||||||||
Earnings before interest and taxes |
1,259 | 10,299 | 8,412 | 14,472 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(149 | ) | (1,105 | ) | (703 | ) | (3,683 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings before taxes |
1,110 | 9,194 | 7,709 | 10,789 | ||||||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit: |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
(1,919 | ) | | (3,165 | ) | | ||||||||||
Deferred |
1,486 | (3,476 | ) | 158 | (4,080 | ) | ||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
433 | | 2,667 | | ||||||||||||
| (3,476 | ) | (340 | ) | (4,080 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,110 | $ | 5,718 | $ | 7,369 | $ | 6,709 | ||||||||
Earnings per share of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.78 | ||||||||
Average number of common shares and
common share equivalents outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
9,001,687 | 8,629,016 | 8,943,441 | 8,655,892 | ||||||||||||
Basic |
8,704,694 | 8,526,914 | 8,693,298 | 8,525,358 | ||||||||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
-2-
LESCO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, 2004 |
September 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | (unaudited) |
(unaudited) |
(audited) |
|||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 8,007 | $ | 2,906 | $ | 7,505 | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
14,306 | 81,569 | 19,278 | |||||||||
Inventories |
110,931 | 105,320 | 93,580 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 3,269 | | |||||||||
Other |
3,818 | 1,927 | 6,980 | |||||||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
137,062 | 194,991 | 127,343 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
27,310 | 32,843 | 31,481 | |||||||||
Other |
2,245 | 5,285 | 2,541 | |||||||||
$ | 166,617 | $ | 233,119 | $ | 161,365 | |||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 63,484 | $ | 63,467 | $ | 53,874 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
17,356 | 17,465 | 14,626 | |||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
| 57,860 | 15,513 | |||||||||
Current portion of debt |
| 1,096 | 28 | |||||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
80,840 | 139,888 | 84,041 | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
5,875 | 9,194 | 5,875 | |||||||||
Deferred other |
555 | 129 | 179 | |||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||||||
Preferred shareswithout par value500,000 shares
authorized; 1,713 shares
issued and outstanding at
September 30, 2003,
liquidation value $1,000
per share |
| 1,713 | | |||||||||
Common shareswithout par value19,500,000 shares
authorized; 8,704,694
shares issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2004; 8,642,563
shares issued and
8,528,914 outstanding at
September 30, 2003 and
8,668,914 shares issued
and outstanding at
December 31, 2003 |
871 | 864 | 867 | |||||||||
Paid-in capital |
34,970 | 34,938 | 34,619 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
44,631 | 49,268 | 37,262 | |||||||||
Unearned compensation |
(1,125 | ) | | (1,478 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
| (920 | ) | | ||||||||
Less: Treasury shares, 113,649 at September 30, 2003 |
| (1,955 | ) | | ||||||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
79,347 | 83,908 | 71,270 | |||||||||
$ | 166,617 | $ | 233,119 | $ | 161,365 | |||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
-3-
LESCO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,369 | $ | 6,709 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
5,536 | 5,740 | ||||||
Amortization of unearned compensation |
492 | | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing fees and other |
129 | 782 | ||||||
Loss on sale of assets |
96 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| (328 | ) | |||||
Increase in accounts receivable |
(974 | ) | (15,403 | ) | ||||
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable |
| 1,656 | ||||||
Decrease in current income tax |
4,005 | 5,709 | ||||||
Increase in inventories |
(17,351 | ) | (18,483 | ) | ||||
Increase in accounts payable |
15,710 | 18,149 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in other items |
2,468 | (5,339 | ) | |||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
17,480 | (808 | ) | |||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds on the sale of fixed assets |
1,597 | | ||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(3,096 | ) | (4,645 | ) | ||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(1,499 | ) | (4,645 | ) | ||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Sale of accounts receivable |
5,946 | | ||||||
(Decrease) increase in overdraft balances |
(6,100 | ) | 6,879 | |||||
Proceeds from borrowings |
487,541 | 456,208 | ||||||
Reduction of borrowings |
(503,082 | ) | (456,485 | ) | ||||
Exercised stock options, net of treasury shares |
216 | 37 | ||||||
NET CASH (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
(15,479 | ) | 6,639 | |||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
502 | 1,186 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents Beginning of the period |
7,505 | 1,720 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS END OF THE PERIOD |
$ | 8,007 | $ | 2,906 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Interest paid, including letters of credit and unused facility fees |
$ | (608 | ) | $ | (3,687 | ) | ||
Income taxes refunded |
$ | 3,576 | $ | 69 | ||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
-4-
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Description of Business and Segment Information
LESCO, Inc. (LESCO or the Company) is the largest provider of products for the professional turf care segment of the green industry. Products distributed include turf control products, fertilizer, combination fertilizer and control products (combination products), grass seed and equipment. The Company sells products through 273 Service Centers, 72 Stores-on-Wheels, the Internet, 76 direct sales representatives and other direct sales efforts. The Company operates eight distribution hubs, three fertilizer blending facilities and a grass seed processing plant.
Segment Information: The Selling and Support segments reported below are the segments of the Company for which separate information is available and for which operating results are evaluated regularly by the Chief Executive Officer in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
The Company maintains separate operating statements (Four-Wall P&Ls) for each selling location. These Four-Wall P&Ls include the sales and operating expenses necessary to operate the individual selling locations. The Selling segment operating results reflect the aggregate Four-Wall P&Ls of the selling locations adjusted for costs of zone and regional management, sales commission expense, working capital interest charge and the portion of merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts not previously charged to the Four-Wall P&Ls. The Support segment represents the operating results and invested capital of all non-selling locations including manufacturing facilities (blending facilities and seed processing plant), distribution hubs and the corporate office.
Below are the unaudited results for the Selling and Support segments for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
||||||||||||||||
Selling |
$ | 152,655 | $ | 147,721 | $ | 436,888 | $ | 414,731 | ||||||||
Support |
| | | | ||||||||||||
$ | 152,655 | $ | 147,721 | $ | 436,888 | $ | 414,731 | |||||||||
Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes |
||||||||||||||||
Selling |
$ | 36,156 | $ | 41,133 | $ | 68,208 | $ | 72,151 | ||||||||
Support |
(34,897 | ) | (30,834 | ) | (59,796 | ) | (57,679 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 1,259 | $ | 10,299 | $ | 8,412 | $ | 14,472 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures |
||||||||||||||||
Selling |
$ | 283 | $ | 313 | $ | 1,066 | $ | 3,065 | ||||||||
Support |
718 | 249 | 2,030 | 1,580 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,001 | $ | 562 | $ | 3,096 | $ | 4,645 | |||||||||
Depreciation expense |
||||||||||||||||
Selling |
$ | 282 | $ | 205 | $ | 831 | $ | 497 | ||||||||
Support |
1,539 | 1,778 | 4,705 | 5,243 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,821 | $ | 1,983 | $ | 5,536 | $ | 5,740 | |||||||||
Intangible asset amortization expense |
||||||||||||||||
Selling |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Support |
44 | 261 | 129 | 782 | ||||||||||||
$ | 44 | $ | 261 | $ | 129 | $ | 782 | |||||||||
Identifiable assets |
||||||||||||||||
Selling |
$ | 83,503 | $ | 140,094 | $ | 83,503 | $ | 140,094 | ||||||||
Support |
83,114 | 93,025 | 83,114 | 93,025 | ||||||||||||
$ | 166,617 | $ | 233,119 | $ | 166,617 | $ | 233,119 | |||||||||
-5-
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies
1. Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for interim periods. For further information, refer to the audited financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2003 included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Companys consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 which were included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (File No. 0-13147) on March 29, 2004. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Form 10-K referred to above. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current presentation. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year due to the seasonal nature of the Companys business.
2. Earnings Per Share: The Company presents both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) amounts. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income, less the preferred dividend in 2003, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the three months and nine months ended September 30. Diluted EPS is based upon the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the quarter utilizing the treasury stock method for stock options. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the computation in periods in which they have an anti-dilutive effect, such as when the exercise price of stock options exceeds the average market price for the period or when the Company incurs a net loss for the period reported.
A reconciliation of net income applicable to common shares and the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding is as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,110 | $ | 5,718 | $ | 7,369 | $ | 6,709 | ||||||||
Preferred shares dividend |
| (30 | ) | | (84 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income applicable to common shares |
$ | 1,110 | $ | 5,688 | $ | 7,369 | $ | 6,625 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding (basic) |
8,704,694 | 8,526,914 | 8,693,298 | 8,525,358 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average dilutive stock options |
296,993 | 102,102 | 250,143 | 130,534 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding (diluted) |
9,001,687 | 8,629,016 | 8,943,441 | 8,655,892 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.78 |
3. Stock Based Compensation: The Company uses the intrinsic-value method of accounting for stock-based awards granted to employees and, accordingly, does not recognize compensation expense for its stock-based awards to employees in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
-6-
The following table reflects pro forma net income and earnings per share had the Company elected to adopt the fair value approach of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Net income as reported |
$ | 1,110 | $ | 5,718 | $ | 7,369 | $ | 6,709 | ||||||||
Less: stock option expense, net of tax |
(137 | ) | (151 | ) | (420 | ) | (460 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 973 | $ | 5,567 | $ | 6,949 | $ | 6,249 | ||||||||
Earnings per diluted share |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 0.72 | ||||||||
Earnings per basic share |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.78 | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.73 |
These pro forma amounts may not be representative of future disclosures because the estimated fair value of stock options is amortized to expense over the vesting period, and additional options may be granted in future periods.
4. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist of the following:
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
2003 |
|||||||||
Supplier rebate programs |
$ | 8,958 | $ | 9,006 | $ | 9,328 | ||||||
Trade receivables |
||||||||||||
Owned domestic |
6,238 | 75,912 | 6,798 | |||||||||
Owned international |
1,642 | 1,728 | 1,578 | |||||||||
Recourse |
79 | | 5,751 | |||||||||
Other |
966 | 841 | 709 | |||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(3,577 | ) | (5,918 | ) | (4,886 | ) | ||||||
$ | 14,306 | $ | 81,569 | $ | 19,278 | |||||||
The Company earns product discounts under various supplier rebate programs, which are recorded as accounts receivable and a reduction to the cost of inventory when earned. When the related inventory is sold, the inventory valuation reserves are recognized as reductions to cost of sales.
On December 30, 2003, the Company sold a majority of its trade accounts receivable portfolio to GE Capital Financial Inc., dba GE Business Credit Services (GEBCS), for cash proceeds of approximately $57 million resulting in a pre-tax charge of $4.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2003. In the first nine months of 2004, the Company sold additional accounts for cash proceeds of approximately $6 million and recognized no gain or loss on the transactions.
Concurrent with the December 30, 2003 sale, the Company and GEBCS entered a private label business credit program agreement (Credit Agreement). Under the Credit Agreement, GEBCS extends commercial credit to qualified customers of LESCO and funds the program sales, less program fees and discounts, within three business days. The Credit Agreement also provides the Company the option of extending deferred payment terms to customers through the payment of incremental promotional discounts. The in-transit funds are recognized by the Company as cash equivalents. The program fees and discounts and promotional discounts are recognized as merchant discounts in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. GEBCS is the exclusive owner of the program accounts and, except for the recourse account portfolio discussed below, bears all credit losses.
-7-
The owned domestic credit accounts are accounts that did not qualify for sale to GEBCS or for the credit recourse portfolio. LESCO has retained the ownership and management of the owned domestic credit accounts.
The Credit Agreement does not allow for the ownership of international credit accounts by GEBCS. As such, LESCO has retained the ownership and management of international accounts. All international accounts are denominated in U.S. dollars.
GEBCS has sole discretion under the Credit Agreement to approve or decline prospective account holders. LESCO may request GEBCS to include declined accounts in a portfolio of credit recourse accounts. LESCO bears all credit losses on credit recourse accounts and pays a fee to GEBCS to manage the credit recourse portfolio. LESCO did not recognize the initial sale of recourse accounts to GEBCS as of December 30, 2003. Therefore, all recourse receivable balances that existed at December 30, 2003 (the date of the GEBCS transaction) continue to be recognized as accounts receivable by the Company, along with a corresponding borrowing from GEBCS. Sales activity on recourse accounts subsequent to December 30, 2003 is not recognized on the Companys balance sheet. A reconciliation of total recourse account balances to the receivable portion owned by the Company and recorded in the balance sheets is as follows:
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
2003 |
|||||||||
Total recourse account balances |
$ | 4,799 | $ | | $ | 5,751 | ||||||
Accounts owned by GEBCS |
(4,720 | ) | | | ||||||||
Recourse receivables owned by LESCO |
$ | 79 | $ | | $ | 5,751 | ||||||
In the allowance for doubtful accounts, the Company provides for expected losses from all owned receivables and GEBCS-owned recourse accounts. Expected losses are estimated based upon the number of days the accounts are past due, historical loss experience of the Company, historical loss experience of credit portfolios with characteristics similar to the Companys portfolio and the current business environment.
5. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
2003 |
|||||||||
Finished goods and purchased inventories |
||||||||||||
Selling locations |
$ | 64,307 | $ | 60,256 | $ | 46,858 | ||||||
Distribution hubs and plants |
41,501 | 40,159 | 37,664 | |||||||||
Capitalized procurement, warehousing and distribution costs |
7,193 | 7,330 | 6,681 | |||||||||
Less: Markdown, shrink and vendor discount reserves |
(1,528 | ) | (2,976 | ) | (1,563 | ) | ||||||
Inventory held on consignment |
(8,856 | ) | (7,725 | ) | (5,832 | ) | ||||||
102,617 | 97,044 | 83,808 | ||||||||||
Raw Materials |
8,314 | 8,276 | 9,772 | |||||||||
$ | 110,931 | $ | 105,320 | $ | 93,580 | |||||||
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (average cost method) or market. Consignment inventory is considered purchased and cost of product is recognized at the time of sale. Procurement, warehousing and distribution costs are capitalized to inventory on hand and expensed to distribution cost when the inventory is sold. Markdown, shrink and vendor discount reserves are provided for markdown of inventory to net realizable value, expected inventory shrink and earned supplier discounts of inventory remaining on hand.
-8-
6. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Buildings are depreciated over 15 to 20 years, and machinery, equipment and other depreciable assets are depreciated over three to 12 years. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Additions and improvements are capitalized.
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company sold its Avon Lake, Ohio distribution facility for $1.5 million in cash. Based on the remaining net book value of the assets sold, this resulted in a loss on sale of less than $0.1 million. The distribution operations for customer orders previously fulfilled from the Avon Lake facility have been transferred to a third party logistics provider based in Columbus, Ohio.
Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following:
September 30, 2004 |
September 30, 2003 |
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling | Selling | Selling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Locations |
Support |
Total |
Locations |
Support |
Total |
Locations |
Support |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land |
$ | | $ | 600 | $ | 600 | $ | | $ | 934 | $ | 934 | $ | | $ | 834 | $ | 834 | ||||||||||||||||||
Buildings and improvements |
1,441 | 18,527 | 19,968 | 1,322 | 21,515 | 22,837 | 1,391 | 21,174 | 22,565 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
3,905 | 20,797 | 24,702 | 3,901 | 21,734 | 25,635 | 3,746 | 20,549 | 24,295 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
6,601 | 30,633 | 37,234 | 4,558 | 31,153 | 35,711 | 6,262 | 29,636 | 35,898 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
11,947 | 70,557 | 82,504 | 9,781 | 75,336 | 85,117 | 11,399 | 72,193 | 83,592 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(7,039 | ) | (48,155 | ) | (55,194 | ) | (6,363 | ) | (45,911 | ) | (52,274 | ) | (6,324 | ) | (45,787 | ) | (52,111 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 4,908 | $ | 22,402 | $ | 27,310 | $ | 3,418 | $ | 29,425 | $ | 32,843 | $ | 5,075 | $ | 26,406 | $ | 31,481 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation expense is included in the following:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Cost of product |
$ | 504 | $ | 635 | $ | 1,530 | $ | 2,012 | ||||||||
Distribution cost |
191 | 168 | 655 | 414 | ||||||||||||
Selling expense |
282 | 205 | 831 | 497 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expense |
844 | 975 | 2,520 | 2,817 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,821 | $ | 1,983 | $ | 5,536 | $ | 5,740 | ||||||||
-9-
7. Borrowings
Borrowings consist of the following:
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
2003 |
|||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | | $ | 57,860 | $ | 15,513 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
| 1,096 | 28 | |||||||||
$ | | $ | 58,956 | $ | 15,541 | |||||||
Long-term: |
||||||||||||
Term loan |
$ | | $ | 3,319 | $ | | ||||||
Industrial revenue bonds |
5,875 | 5,875 | 5,875 | |||||||||
Other debt |
| | 28 | |||||||||
Less: current portion |
| | (28 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 5,875 | $ | 9,194 | $ | 5,875 | |||||||
Revolving Credit Facility
On December 30, 2003, the Company entered into a $50 million Revolving Credit Facility (the Facility) which replaced a prior credit facility. Borrowings under the Facility were used to retire the prior credit facility, including a term loan, buy-out an interest rate swap agreement and buy-back outstanding preferred stock.
The Facility matures December 30, 2006 and is secured by inventory, owned receivables, equipment, investment interests, real property interests, and general intangibles, including intellectual property. The Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% to 2.5% per annum, based on the level of borrowings, and requires the payment of a facility fee ranging from 0.4% to 0.5% per annum on the unused portion of availability. The availability under the Facility is determined by a borrowing base formula calculated on eligible inventory. As of September 30, 2004, there was $46.9 million available, with unused capacity of $36.3 million. Letters of credit, up to a maximum of $20 million, are also available under the Facility and are considered outstanding borrowings when calculating the unused portion of availability. Letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $10.6 million were outstanding as of September 30, 2004. Letter of credit fees range from 2.0% to 2.5% with an issuance fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.150%.
The Facility requires the maintenance of certain covenants, with the only financial covenant being a fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with the Facility covenants as of September 30, 2004.
8. Asset Rationalization and Severance Expense
Major components of the remaining reserves and accruals for asset rationalization and severance expense as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are as follows:
Asset Rationalization Accrual |
||||||||||||||||||||
Lease | Other Exit | Severance | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Costs |
Costs |
Total |
Accrual |
Total |
|||||||||||||||
Asset rationalization and severance
accruals at December 31, 2003 |
$ | 220 | $ | 830 | $ | 1,050 | $ | 532 | $ | 1,582 | ||||||||||
2004 Activity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
| | | 138 | 138 | |||||||||||||||
Utilized/payments |
(32 | ) | (219 | ) | (251 | ) | (644 | ) | (895 | ) | ||||||||||
Asset rationalization reserves and
severance accruals at September 30, 2004 |
$ | 188 | $ | 611 | $ | 799 | $ | 26 | $ | 825 | ||||||||||
The Company anticipates utilizing the remaining asset rationalization accrual by the end of 2004.
-10-
9. Detail of Certain Balance Sheets Accounts
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
2003 |
|||||||||
Other current assets: |
||||||||||||
Income tax refund receivable |
$ | | $ | | $ | 3,740 | ||||||
Other prepaids |
1,272 | 1,115 | 1,548 | |||||||||
Prepaid insurance |
1,680 | 817 | 1,033 | |||||||||
Notes receivable |
592 | (5 | ) | 385 | ||||||||
Assets held for sale |
274 | | 274 | |||||||||
$ | 3,818 | $ | 1,927 | $ | 6,980 | |||||||
Other non-current assets: |
||||||||||||
Notes receivable |
$ | 1,350 | $ | 1,089 | $ | 1,466 | ||||||
Store deposits |
562 | 607 | 572 | |||||||||
Deferred financing charges |
210 | 1,345 | 416 | |||||||||
Assets held for sale |
| 274 | | |||||||||
Miscellaneous deposits |
86 | 86 | 87 | |||||||||
Other prepaids |
37 | | | |||||||||
Deferred federal income tax |
| 1,142 | | |||||||||
Investment joint venture |
| 742 | | |||||||||
$ | 2,245 | $ | 5,285 | $ | 2,541 | |||||||
Accounts payable: |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 57,292 | $ | 54,241 | $ | 35,910 | ||||||
Overdraft balances |
6,113 | 9,226 | 12,213 | |||||||||
Accounts payable to GEBCS for recourse accounts receivable |
79 | | 5,751 | |||||||||
$ | 63,484 | $ | 63,467 | $ | 53,874 | |||||||
Accrued liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accrued non-income taxes |
$ | 3,126 | $ | 3,140 | $ | 3,510 | ||||||
Commissions and management bonuses |
4,914 | 2,077 | 2,650 | |||||||||
Salaries and wages |
1,498 | 793 | 1,918 | |||||||||
Insurance hospitalization and workers compensation |
2,816 | 2,576 | 2,383 | |||||||||
Asset rationalization |
799 | 1,232 | 1,050 | |||||||||
Insurance property and casualty |
1,092 | 868 | 1,028 | |||||||||
Severance |
26 | 595 | 532 | |||||||||
Interest rate swap |
| 1,509 | | |||||||||
Other |
3,085 | 4,675 | 1,555 | |||||||||
$ | 17,356 | $ | 17,465 | $ | 14,626 | |||||||
-11-
10. Detail of Certain Statements of Operations Accounts
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Net sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Gross sales |
$ | 153,388 | $ | 148,150 | $ | 439,469 | $ | 416,994 | ||||||||
Agency sales |
(622 | ) | | (1,049 | ) | | ||||||||||
Freight revenue |
431 | 423 | 1,251 | 1,242 | ||||||||||||
Customer discounts and rebates |
(542 | ) | (852 | ) | (2,783 | ) | (3,505 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 152,655 | $ | 147,721 | $ | 436,888 | $ | 414,731 | |||||||||
Merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts: |
||||||||||||||||
Merchant discounts |
||||||||||||||||
Multi-purpose credit programs |
$ | (531 | ) | $ | (421 | ) | $ | (1,413 | ) | $ | (1,204 | ) | ||||
Private label business credit programs |
(1,743 | ) | | (4,682 | ) | | ||||||||||
Private label promotional discounts |
(225 | ) | | (378 | ) | | ||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
| (552 | ) | | (1,656 | ) | ||||||||||
Customer finance revenue |
62 | 553 | 264 | 1,201 | ||||||||||||
Other |
(241 | ) | (264 | ) | (650 | ) | (766 | ) | ||||||||
$ | (2,678 | ) | $ | (684 | ) | $ | (6,859 | ) | $ | (2,425 | ) | |||||
Other expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Severance |
$ | (24 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (138 | ) | $ | (487 | ) | ||||
Loss on sale/disposal of fixed assets |
(20 | ) | | (96 | ) | (139 | ) | |||||||||
Other |
(6 | ) | 1 | (8 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||
$ | (50 | ) | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (242 | ) | $ | (637 | ) | |||||
Other income: |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture income |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 590 | ||||||||
Payment discounts |
47 | 172 | 314 | 593 | ||||||||||||
Other |
47 | 20 | 150 | 75 | ||||||||||||
$ | 94 | $ | 192 | $ | 464 | $ | 1,258 | |||||||||
Interest expense and facility fees: |
||||||||||||||||
Borrowings on revolver |
$ | (25 | ) | $ | (596 | ) | $ | (332 | ) | $ | (2,269 | ) | ||||
Other revolver fees |
(56 | ) | (78 | ) | (168 | ) | (191 | ) | ||||||||
Interest rate swap |
| (317 | ) | | (895 | ) | ||||||||||
Other debt and letters of credit costs |
(68 | ) | (114 | ) | (203 | ) | (328 | ) | ||||||||
$ | (149 | ) | $ | (1,105 | ) | $ | (703 | ) | $ | (3,683 | ) | |||||
Note 3. Relocation of Corporate Headquarters
During the third quarter of 2004, LESCO entered into agreements to relocate its corporate headquarters from its current approximately 94,000 square foot facility in Strongsville, Ohio to an approximately 40,000 square foot facility in downtown Cleveland, Ohio. The term of the Companys new lease is five and a half years, and the Company expects to complete the relocation this year. A division of a public company (the Assignee) will assume the remaining 11 years of LESCOs current lease at the Strongsville location.
-12-
Relocation costs are estimated at approximately $7.5 million including $4.8 million in tenant and landlord inducements, and $2.7 million in broker commissions, legal fees, letter of credit costs, move costs and fixed-asset write offs. During the third quarter, the Company recorded $4.9 million of expense related to this relocation. Beginning in 2005, the financial effect of the relocation is expected to be accretive to earnings on an annual pre-tax basis by approximately $1.0 million. The return on the cost to relocate is estimated at greater than 7%.
LESCO remains liable under the lease if the Assignee fails to perform. The Assignee will be obligated to secure a $4.4 million letter of credit backing its performance under the lease, and LESCO will pay the Assignee approximately $100,000 annually for the remaining term of the lease to defray the cost of the letter of credit.
Note 4. Subsequent Events
Subsequent to the balance sheet date, LESCO notified its supplier of methylene urea fertilizer that the Company will no longer operate under the terms of a supply agreement with the supplier. The five-year supply agreement between LESCO and its supplier was entered into in November 2002 and requires the Company to purchase annually 8,000 tons of methylene urea fertilizer from the supplier at a fixed conversion cost of $500 per ton plus the prevailing commodities market prices which were approximately $270 per ton for the first nine months of 2004. Management believes that it is advantageous to operating results to exit the supply agreement and currently estimates that the corresponding savings over the remaining term of the agreement will exceed the cost to exit the supply agreement. It is the Companys intent to source methylene urea fertilizer from other available market sources.
Subsequent to the balance sheet date, LESCO notified the issuer of industrial development revenue bonds related to the Companys Martins Ferry, Ohio facility that LESCO is electing to call for its optional redemption of the bonds prior to their maturity date. There is no prepayment penalty for the early extinguishment of the $5.9 million debt. The Company expects to redeem these bonds during the fourth quarter of 2004.
-13-
LESCO, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Organization of Information
This discussion provides a narrative on the Companys financial performance and condition that should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements. It includes the following sections:
| Overview | |||
| Consolidated Results | |||
| Business Segments | |||
| Liquidity and Capital Resources | |||
| Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates | |||
| Forward Looking Statements |
OVERVIEW
LESCO is the largest provider of products to the professional turf care segment of the green industry. The professional users of our products include lawn care and landscape firms and the employees of a variety of commercial, governmental, institutional and industrial establishments, including golf courses, sod farms, airports, cemeteries, professional sports organizations, universities, schools, commercial properties and numerous other organizations that use in-house employees to maintain lawns and gardens.
We track our customers through two customer sectors: Lawn Care and Golf.
Gross sales for these sectors for the three months and nine months ended September 30 were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Lawn Care |
$ | 112.6 | $ | 105.2 | $ | 339.5 | $ | 314.6 | ||||||||
Golf |
40.8 | 42.9 | 100.0 | 102.4 | ||||||||||||
$ | 153.4 | $ | 148.1 | $ | 439.5 | $ | 417.0 | |||||||||
The separation of our customers into these two sectors is important as distribution to the sectors is markedly different and their growth prospects vary significantly.
Our Lawn Care sector includes all non-golf related customers and is dominated by lawn care and landscape firms. Historically, the distribution of products into this sector has been fragmented and inefficient. We believe that our model of Service Centers and direct sales provides efficiency to the sectors distribution channels through easily accessible, strategically positioned real estate where we provide agronomic expertise through our 273 Service Centers and direct sales associates with products specifically targeted to the Lawn Care sector. We estimate the market for our Lawn Care products at $4.6 billion, and independent research indicates that organic growth in the sector is expected to be 5% annually for the next several years due to the aging of the baby boomers and their increasing desire to contract lawn care professionals, the higher number of two-income families and continued time constraints on consumers.
The golf industry is a smaller market (estimated at $1.4 billion) and is not expected to grow significantly in the near future, nor do we believe our opportunities are as great in this sector as those in the Lawn Care sector. Additionally, the industry has experienced a decline in annual rounds of golf being played, which has decreased the budgets of golf course superintendents; however, that trend appears to be moderating in the first nine months of 2004. The ability to capture incremental market share in this industry is limited as distribution of our products to the industry is dominated by a few national and regional distributors. We anticipate that we will be able to expand our presence in under-serviced markets, but we are not planning any major expansion of Stores-on-Wheels or direct golf sales in the near future.
-14-
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
LESCO, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - UNAUDITED
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 152,655 | $ | 147,721 | $ | 436,888 | $ | 414,731 | ||||||||
Cost of product |
(99,893 | ) | (97,120 | ) | (289,374 | ) | (275,561 | ) | ||||||||
Distribution cost |
(12,106 | ) | (11,891 | ) | (36,205 | ) | (37,144 | ) | ||||||||
Gross profit on sales |
40,656 | 38,710 | 111,309 | 102,026 | ||||||||||||
Selling expense |
(23,450 | ) | (20,455 | ) | (68,361 | ) | (63,456 | ) | ||||||||
General & administrative expense |
(7,085 | ) | (7,301 | ) | (20,946 | ) | (21,874 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate relocation expense |
(4,940 | ) | | (4,940 | ) | | ||||||||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
(1,350 | ) | | (1,350 | ) | | ||||||||||
Merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts |
(2,678 | ) | (684 | ) | (6,859 | ) | (2,425 | ) | ||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
62 | (130 | ) | (663 | ) | (420 | ) | |||||||||
Other expense |
(50 | ) | (33 | ) | (242 | ) | (637 | ) | ||||||||
Other income |
94 | 192 | 464 | 1,258 | ||||||||||||
Earnings before interest and taxes |
1,259 | 10,299 | 8,412 | 14,472 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense, net |
(149 | ) | (1,105 | ) | (703 | ) | (3,683 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings before taxes |
$ | 1,110 | $ | 9,194 | $ | 7,709 | $ | 10,789 | ||||||||
Sales:
Service Centers: Gross sales for LESCO Service Centers® of $107.4 million for the third quarter of 2004 reflect sales transacted through our 273 Service Centers in operation as of September 30, 2004, including 26 new Service Centers opened in the first nine months of 2004 (of which one opened in the third quarter) and 21 new Service Centers opened during 2003. The total increase of 6% over the prior year third quarter results of $101.1 million reflects a decline of nearly 1% in same-store sales (excluding the 47 new units) and an increase of 7% from incremental new Service Centers of $7.1 million. Comparable-store sales were affected by inclement weather conditions in the Southeast region caused by increased hurricane activity compared to the same period last year . Management estimates that the negative effect of weather conditions on comparable-store sales was 2% for the third quarter and 1% year to date. The sales growth for the quarter was predominantly generated in the fertilizer and combination product categories. For the first nine months, Service Center sales expanded 7% to $303.1 million from $282.5 million for the same period in 2003. The increase in sales revenues was produced from a 1% same-store sales advance coupled with a 6% sales lift, or $17.6 million, from incremental new store revenues. Similar to the third quarter sales growth, fertilizer and combination products provided the vast majority of the sales increase for the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. The primary products sold through Service Centers are turf care products, including turf and pest control products, fertilizer, grass seed and equipment. The Service Centers market and sell products principally to lawn care companies, landscapers, public and private golf courses, nurseries, municipalities, churches and condominium associations. The Company plans to open 27 Service Centers during 2004 of which 26 were opened in the first nine months of the year.
Other Selling Locations: The Company also markets and sells products to private and public golf courses and other customers having large turf areas through direct sales programs and our fleet of LESCO Stores-on-Wheels®. Through these selling channels, the Company generated sales of $46.0 million for the third quarter of 2004, a 2% decline from the $47.0 million in sales for the third quarter of 2003. The inclement weather conditions in the Southeast region impacted third quarter sales as the Companys other selling channels produced sales growth of 3% through the first half of 2004. For the first nine months of 2004, these other selling channels produced a 1% increase, led by fertilizer and combination products, to $136.4 million from $134.5 million for the same period in 2003. The Companys direct channel markets and sells products to large national and regional lawn care customers utilizing sales representatives, markets products by mail order catalog, transacts orders through the Internet and participates in national and regional lawn care trade shows. A telemarketing sales group calls on inactive accounts and contacts customers not currently serviced by the
-15-
Companys outside sales forces. In addition, products are marketed internationally, principally through foreign distributors. The Stores-on-Wheels are well stocked with a wide variety of turf care products and golf course accessories, which are sold directly from the trucks. The Company operated 72 LESCO Stores-on-Wheels in the third quarters of 2004 and 2003. The primary products sold through this channel are turf care products, including turf and pest control, fertilizer, grass seed, hand held equipment and golf course accessories.
The following table provides supplemental detail of sales by customer sector and selling locations for the third quarter and first nine months of each respective year:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
% Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service | Selling | Service | Selling | Service | Other Selling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Centers |
Locations |
Total |
Centers |
Locations |
Total |
Centers |
Locations |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lawn care |
$ | 95.0 | $ | 17.6 | $ | 112.6 | $ | 89.5 | $ | 15.7 | $ | 105.2 | 6.1 | % | 12.1 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Golf |
12.4 | 28.4 | 40.8 | 11.6 | 31.3 | 42.9 | 6.9 | (9.3 | ) | (4.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross sales |
$ | 107.4 | $ | 46.0 | $ | 153.4 | $ | 101.1 | $ | 47.0 | $ | 148.1 | 6.2 | % | (2.1 | )% | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Agency sales |
(0.6 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freight revenue |
0.4 | 0.4 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer discounts and rebates |
(0.5 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (37.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 152.7 | $ | 147.7 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
% Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service | Selling | Service | Other Selling | Service | Selling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Centers |
Locations |
Total |
Centers |
Locations |
Total |
Centers |
Locations |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lawn care |
$ | 276.4 | $ | 63.1 | $ | 339.5 | $ | 259.6 | $ | 55.0 | $ | 314.6 | 6.5 | % | 14.7 | % | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Golf |
26.7 | 73.3 | 100.0 | 22.9 | 79.5 | 102.4 | 16.6 | (7.8 | ) | (2.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross sales |
$ | 303.1 | $ | 136.4 | $ | 439.5 | $ | 282.5 | $ | 134.5 | $ | 417.0 | 7.3 | % | 1.4 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Agency sales |
(1.0 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freight revenue |
1.2 | 1.2 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer discounts and rebates |
(2.8 | ) | (3.5 | ) | (20.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 436.9 | $ | 414.7 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency Sales, Freight Revenue and Customer Discounts and Rebates: The Company has entered into agency agreements with certain of its suppliers whereby the Company operates as a sales agent of those suppliers. The suppliers retain title to their merchandise until it is sold by the Company and determine the prices at which LESCO can sell the suppliers merchandise. As such, the Company recognizes sales on a net basis and records only its product margin as revenue. Therefore, the $0.6 million of agency sales for the third quarter, and $1.0 million for the first nine months of 2004, represent the portion of revenue that exceeds the Companys net product margin. Freight revenue, which represents fees charged to customers in sales transactions for shipping and handling, remained flat year over year for the quarter and on a year-to-date basis. Customer discounts and rebates declined slightly from the prior year in both the quarter, a $0.3 million decline, and the first nine months, a $0.7 million reduction, as the number of customer rebate programs has been reduced.
-16-
Gross Profit on Sales:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of Net | % of Net | % of Net | % of Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Dollars |
Sales |
Dollars |
Sales |
Dollars |
Sales |
Dollars |
Sales |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product margin |
$ | 52.8 | 34.6 | % | $ | 50.6 | 34.3 | % | $ | 147.5 | 33.8 | % | $ | 139.2 | 33.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Distribution cost |
(12.1 | ) | (7.9 | ) | (11.9 | ) | (8.1 | ) | (36.2 | ) | (8.3 | ) | (37.2 | ) | (9.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 40.7 | 26.7 | % | $ | 38.7 | 26.2 | % | $ | 111.3 | 25.5 | % | $ | 102.0 | 24.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Product margin improved 30 basis points in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the like period in 2003 and improved 20 basis points on a year-over-year basis for the first nine months. The product margin improvement was achieved through expanding margins in the Companys combination, control and pest control product categories. This expansion in product margin is despite a year-over-year comparative price increase for urea of approximately 10% for the third quarter and nearly 20% for the first nine months of 2004. Urea is our largest single purchased product or raw material, which is used as the nitrogen source for blended fertilizers and combination products. Urea is a second derivative of natural gas and its cost has increased with the increased cost of natural gas. Urea can represent approximately 7% to 9% of our cost of sales. For 2004, we entered into a contract with our urea supplier to fix the cost of a majority of our urea needs at a price reflecting the prevailing market. During the third quarter of 2004, the Company entered into another contract with its urea supplier to fix LESCOs cost for a majority of its urea needs from December 2004 to December 2005. The new contract rate for urea purchases increased approximately 14% over the existing contract rate.
Additionally, during the third quarter, LESCO entered into a purchase agreement to satisfy the majority of its potash requirements for 2005. The contract period is from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 at a rate that will increase approximately 24% over the Companys current purchase price.
Operating Expenses:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of Net | % of Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Dollars |
Sales |
Dollars |
Sales |
Dollars |
% |
Basis Points |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Selling expense |
$ | 23.5 | 15.4 | % | $ | 20.5 | 13.9 | % | $ | 3.0 | 14.6 | % | 150 | bps | ||||||||||||||
Corporate relocation expense |
4.9 | 3.2 | | | 4.9 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
1.4 | 0.9 | | | 1.4 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Merchant
discounts/provision for
doubtful accounts |
2.7 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 285.7 | 130 | bps | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 32.5 | 21.3 | % | $ | 21.2 | 14.4 | % | $ | 11.3 | 53.3 | % | 690 | bps | |||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of Net | % of Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Dollars |
Sales |
Dollars |
Sales |
Dollars |
% |
Basis Points |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Selling expense |
$ | 68.4 | 15.7 | % | $ | 63.5 | 15.3 | % | $ | 4.9 | 7.7 | % | 40 | bps | ||||||||||||||
Corporate relocation expense |
4.9 | 1.1 | | 0.0 | 4.9 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
1.4 | 0.3 | | 0.0 | 1.4 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Merchant
discounts/provision for
doubtful accounts |
6.9 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 4.5 | 187.5 | 100 | bps | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 81.6 | 18.7 | % | $ | 65.9 | 15.9 | % | $ | 15.7 | 23.8 | % | 280 | bps | |||||||||||||||
-17-
Selling Expense
Selling expense includes all operating expenses of Service Centers and Stores-on-Wheels and direct sales, sales management, customer service and marketing expenses. The third quarter 2004 selling expense increased $3.0 million over the same period last year. Incremental costs from new Service Centers represented approximately $1.5 million of the expense increase. The majority of the remaining increase year-over-year was expected and budgeted for service center payroll and benefits. New Service Center expense for the first nine months of 2004 was $5.6 million compared to $1.9 million for the like period in 2003.
Corporate Relocation Expense
During the third quarter of 2004, LESCO entered into agreements to relocate its corporate headquarters from its current approximately 94,000 square foot facility in Strongsville, Ohio to an approximately 40,000 square foot facility in downtown Cleveland, Ohio. Relocation costs incurred during the third quarter were $4.9 million primarily related to tenant and landlord inducements along with broker commissions and legal fees. The Company previously disclosed that total relocation costs are estimated at approximately $7.5 million and that the majority of the remaining estimated costs are expected to be incurred during the fourth quarter of 2004.
Hurricane/Flood Expense
During the third quarter of 2004, the Company incurred losses at its Sebring, FL and Martins Ferry, OH manufacturing facilities due to hurricane activity in Florida and the related rainfall and flooding activity in Ohio. The total estimated damages are $1.4 million primarily resulting from the loss of approximately $1.0 million of bulk urea and sulfur coated urea that was stored at a third party terminal located adjacent to the Ohio River. Additionally, there was roof and siding damage sustained at the Sebring facility. LESCO is evaluating its claims against the warehouse and other possible avenues of assistance and intends to pursue all means available to recoup this loss. Any future recovery will be reported in the period in which the recovery is reasonably certain.
Merchant Discounts and Provision for Doubtful Accounts
As a percentage of net sales, merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts expense increased 130 basis points year-over-year for the third quarter. On December 30, 2003, we sold our trade accounts receivable portfolio to General Electric Business Credit Services (GEBCS) for $57 million and entered a private label business credit program agreement with GEBCS. In 2004, we sold an additional $6 million of trade accounts receivable to GEBCS. In the third quarter and first nine months of 2004, this arrangement has resulted in increased merchant discounts as we pay program fees and discounts to GEBCS of approximately 1.2% of sales; however, interest expense, provision for doubtful accounts, the general and administrative costs to service the previous in-house program and customer finance revenue have been significantly reduced as compared to the same periods in 2003.
General & Administrative Expense:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||
General & administrative expense |
$ | 7.1 | $ | 7.3 | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 20.9 | $ | 21.9 | $ | (1.0 | ) |
We reduced general & administrative expense in the third quarter of 2004 by $0.2 million as compared to the same period in 2003 while we have reduced our year-to-date expense $1.0 million from the same period a year ago. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2004, the cost savings recognized from tightened expense controls along with the strategic outsourcing of customer financing to GEBCS have virtually offset the increase in expense related to more stringent governance guidelines as well as management bonus and employee insurance/benefits.
-18-
Pre-Opening Expense
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
$ | (0.1 | ) | $ | 0.1 | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 0.7 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 0.3 | ||||||||||
Number of Service Centers opened
during the period |
1 | | 1 | 26 | 21 | 5 |
Pre-opening expense declined $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the same period last year as the Company opened one new Service Center in the third quarter of 2004 and had no additional openings in the third quarter of 2003. Pre-opening expense, which consists primarily of grand opening advertising, payroll, supplies and distribution, and storage costs, is expensed as incurred. The Company overestimated pre-opening costs incurred as of June 30, 2004 and thus reported a negative expense for its third quarter results.
Other (Expense)/Income:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||
Other expense |
$ | (0.1 | ) | $ | | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.6 | ) | $ | 0.4 | ||||||||
Other income |
0.1 | 0.2 | (0.1 | ) | 0.5 | 1.3 | (0.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
$ | | $ | 0.2 | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.7 | $ | (0.4 | ) | |||||||||||
The decrease in other expense/income, net for the third quarter compared to the same period in 2003 was due to the reduction in payment discounts as there were not as many discounts available in the third quarter 2004 as compared to the same period in 2003. The decrease for the first nine months of 2004 primarily relates to our former joint venture. No income or loss was recorded in the first nine months of 2004 related to the joint venture, as we sold our ownership in it in the fourth quarter of 2003, and $0.6 million of income was recognized in the first nine months of 2003. Additionally, on a year-over-year basis, the decline in payment discounts was essentially offset by the decline in severance expense.
Interest Expense:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 1.1 | $ | (1.0 | ) | $ | 0.7 | $ | 3.7 | $ | (3.0 | ) |
Interest expense declined $1.0 million in the third quarter 2004 and $3.0 million for the first nine months versus the same periods in 2003, which was directly related to the sale of the Companys accounts receivable portfolio to GEBCS. The sale of the portfolio has reduced the year-over-year outstanding borrowings on the revolving credit facility during the third quarter and first nine months, and eliminated the interest rate swap agreement that was in place during 2003.
Pre-Tax Earnings:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||
Earnings before taxes |
$ | 1.1 | $ | 9.2 | $ | (8.1 | ) | $ | 7.7 | $ | 10.8 | $ | (3.1 | ) |
In the third quarter of 2004, the Company opened one Service Center location bringing the year-to-date total openings to 26 Service Centers. The Company did not open any new Service Centers in the third quarter of 2003 and opened 21 Service Centers for
-19-
the full year in 2003. Management views new Service Centers as the primary method to leverage our cost base and grow earnings consistently over time. Below are the operating results for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 for the classes of 2003 and 2004 Service Centers:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||
Class of 2004 | Class of 2003 | Class of 2003 | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
(26 Stores) |
(21 Stores) |
Total |
(19 Stores) |
||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 5,136 | $ | 5,619 | $ | 10,755 | $ | 3,699 | ||||||||
Cost of product |
(3,449 | ) | (3,856 | ) | (7,305 | ) | (2,497 | ) | ||||||||
Distribution cost |
(210 | ) | (199 | ) | (409 | ) | (139 | ) | ||||||||
Gross profit on sales |
1,477 | 1,564 | 3,041 | 1,063 | ||||||||||||
Selling expense |
(1,269 | ) | (1,007 | ) | (2,276 | ) | (809 | ) | ||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
62 | | 62 | (130 | ) | |||||||||||
Merchant discount expense |
(70 | ) | (79 | ) | (149 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings before interest
and taxes |
$ | 200 | $ | 478 | $ | 678 | $ | 114 | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||
Class of 2004 | Class of 2003 | Class of 2003 | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
(26 Stores) |
(21 Stores) |
Total |
(19 Stores) |
||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 9,904 | $ | 14,860 | $ | 24,764 | $ | 7,134 | ||||||||
Cost of product |
(6,680 | ) | (10,099 | ) | (16,779 | ) | (4,914 | ) | ||||||||
Distribution cost |
(568 | ) | (598 | ) | (1,166 | ) | (328 | ) | ||||||||
Gross profit on sales |
2,656 | 4,163 | 6,819 | 1,892 | ||||||||||||
Selling expense |
(2,581 | ) | (2,999 | ) | (5,580 | ) | (1,861 | ) | ||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
(663 | ) | | (663 | ) | (420 | ) | |||||||||
Merchant discount expense |
(133 | ) | (202 | ) | (335 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) before interest
and taxes |
$ | (721 | ) | $ | 962 | $ | 241 | $ | (408 | ) | ||||||
As a result of the foregoing factors, including the operating results of new Service Centers, the Company had pre-tax income of $1.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 compared to pre-tax income of $9.2 million for the comparable period last year. Management believes that a more appropriate assessment of LESCOs operating results for comparative analysis should exclude the expenses associated with the corporate relocation costs along with the charges incurred for hurricane and flood damages. Excluding these charges, the Companys pre-tax income for the third quarter of 2004 was $7.4 million.
-20-
For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company generated $7.7 million of pre-tax income compared to $10.8 million for the same period in 2003. When excluding costs associated with the corporate relocation and storm damages, LESCOs year-to-date pre-tax income for 2004 was $14.0 million.
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Pre-tax earnings |
$ | 1,110 | $ | 9,194 | $ | 7,709 | $ | 10,789 | ||||||||
Corporate relocation expense |
4,940 | | 4,940 | | ||||||||||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
1,350 | | 1,350 | | ||||||||||||
Pre-tax earnings before
coporate relocation,
hurricane and flood related
expenses |
$ | 7,400 | $ | 9,194 | $ | 13,999 | $ | 10,789 | ||||||||
Income Taxes and Net Income:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||
Earnings before income tax (provision) benefit |
$ | 1.1 | $ | 9.2 | $ | (8.1 | ) | $ | 7.7 | $ | 10.8 | $ | (3.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
(1.9 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (3.2 | ) | (3.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred |
1.5 | (3.5 | ) | 5.0 | 0.2 | (4.1 | ) | 4.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
0.4 | | 0.4 | 2.7 | | 2.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (3.5 | ) | 3.5 | (0.3 | ) | (4.1 | ) | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 1.1 | $ | 5.7 | $ | (4.6 | ) | $ | 7.4 | $ | 6.7 | $ | 0.7 | |||||||||||
Earnings per share of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.78 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income was $1.1 million, or $0.12 per diluted share, in the third quarter of 2004 and $5.7 million, or $0.66 per diluted share, in third quarter 2003. For the first nine months of 2004, net income was $7.4 million, or $0.82 per diluted share, compared to $6.7 million, or $0.77 per diluted share, for the like period in 2003.
In accordance with the provisions of FAS 109, in the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a charge to establish a valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets, including amounts related to its net operating loss carryforwards. The Company intends to maintain a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets and net operating loss carryforwards until sufficient positive evidence exists to support reversal of some portion or the remainder of the allowance. Until such time, except for minor state and local provisions and adjustments to federal tax refunds, the Company expects to have no reported tax provision or benefit, net of valuation allowance adjustments. In the first nine months of 2004, the Company adjusted previously estimated federal tax refunds by $0.3 million.
The impact of the valuation allowance increased the Companys income tax benefit, and net income, by $0.4 million and increased the earnings per diluted share by $0.05 for the third quarter of 2004. For the first nine months 2004, the valuation allowance enhanced the tax benefit $2.7 million and earnings per diluted share by $0.30.
-21-
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
We manage LESCOs business utilizing two business segments Selling and Support.
Selling Segment
We maintain Four-Wall P&Ls for each of our selling locations (Service Centers, Stores-on-Wheels, direct sales representatives and all other direct selling efforts). These Four-Wall P&Ls include sales, cost of product, distribution cost (freight in-bound to selling locations and out-bound to customers) and operating expenses (including payroll, benefits, rent and utilities) necessary to operate the individual selling locations. The Selling segment operating results reflect the aggregate Four-Wall P&Ls of selling locations adjusted for costs of zone and regional management, sales commission expense, working capital interest charge and the portion of merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts not previously charged to the Four-Wall P&Ls.
We allocate resources, including working, fixed and leased capital, to existing and potential selling locations based upon projected sales and return on invested capital (ROIC). We define ROIC as a percentage calculated by dividing net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) by invested capital. Certain members of LESCO management have incentive compensation based on the Companys consolidated ROIC. For the Selling segment we calculate ROIC as follows:
ROIC = | NOPAT / Invested Capital | |||
NOPAT = | Selling Segment Operating Results | |||
X 61% (1 effective tax rate) | ||||
Invested Capital = | Accounts Receivable (excluding rebate receivable, see Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements); plus | |||
Inventory (excluding capitalized distribution and procurement costs, markdown and shrink reserves and credit for inventory held on consignment see Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements); plus | ||||
Fixed Capital (see Note 2 to Consolidated Financial Statements) |
Our measures of ROIC may not be similar to other similarly titled captions used by other companies. For example, we do not capitalize operating leases or utilize average invested capital over given periods.
-22-
Selling Segment Operating Results
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Net sales |
$ | 436.9 | $ | 414.7 | ||||
Cost of product |
(280.1 | ) | (266.1 | ) | ||||
Distribution cost |
(18.9 | ) | (15.8 | ) | ||||
Gross profit on sales |
137.9 | 132.8 | ||||||
Selling expense |
(62.1 | ) | (57.8 | ) | ||||
Merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts |
(6.9 | ) | (2.4 | ) | ||||
Pre-opening expense |
(0.7 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||
EBIT |
$ | 68.2 | $ | 72.2 | ||||
NOPAT Nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | 41.6 | $ | 44.0 | ||||
NOPAT Three months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 |
$ | 4.3 | $ | 4.9 | ||||
NOPAT Rolling 12 months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | 45.9 | $ | 48.9 | ||||
Invested capital at period end |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 5.3 | $ | 72.6 | ||||
Inventory |
64.3 | 60.3 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
4.9 | 3.4 | ||||||
$ | 74.5 | $ | 136.3 | |||||
ROIC |
61.6 | % | 35.9 | % | ||||
Support Segment
The Support segment includes the operating results and invested capital of all non-selling locations including manufacturing (blending facilities and seed processing plant), distribution hubs (including in-bound freight costs to the distribution hubs), and corporate costs (including corporate management of sales, marketing, customer service, accounting and finance, human resources, information systems, etc.). We believe that these costs are essential to managing the selling locations and to managing a public company, but are not costs that directly translate into incremental sales or positive ROIC. Therefore, resources are only allocated to the Support segment if the result is a net reduction in expenses or the allocation is necessary for the maintenance of facilities, the support of the expansion of selling locations, the maintaining of the corporate structure or is mandated by law or governmental order.
-23-
Support Segment Operating Results
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Cost of product |
(9.2 | ) | (9.4 | ) | ||||
Distribution cost |
(17.3 | ) | (21.4 | ) | ||||
Gross loss on sales |
(26.5 | ) | (30.8 | ) | ||||
Selling expense |
(6.3 | ) | (5.6 | ) | ||||
General & administrative expense |
(21.0 | ) | (21.9 | ) | ||||
Corporate relocation expense |
(4.9 | ) | | |||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
(1.4 | ) | | |||||
Other expense |
(0.2 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||
Other income |
0.5 | 1.2 | ||||||
EBIT |
$ | (59.8 | ) | $ | (57.7 | ) | ||
Adjustments: |
||||||||
Corporate relocation expense |
$ | 4.9 | $ | | ||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
1.4 | | ||||||
Adjusted EBIT (a) |
$ | (53.5 | ) | $ | (57.7 | ) | ||
NOPAT Nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (b) |
$ | (32.6 | ) | $ | (35.2 | ) | ||
NOPAT Three months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (c) |
$ | (8.2 | ) | $ | (7.2 | ) | ||
NOPAT Rolling 12 months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | (40.8 | ) | $ | (42.4 | ) | ||
Invested capital |
$ | 85.2 | $ | 152.1 | ||||
Less: Selling segment invested capital |
(74.5 | ) | (136.3 | ) | ||||
Total support segment invested capital |
$ | 10.7 | $ | 15.8 | ||||
ROIC |
(381.6 | )% | (268.3 | )% | ||||
(a) | Adjusted EBIT for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 excludes charges for corporate relocation and expenses related to hurricane and flood damage. | |||
(b) | NOPAT for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 excludes charges for corporate relocation and expenses related to hurricane and flood damage. | |||
(c) | NOPAT for the three months ended December 31, 2003 excludes the charge incurred for the sale of the Companys accounts receivable portfolio to GEBCS in December 2003. |
As the Support segment operates at a negative ROIC, the Selling segment must provide an adequate return in order for the Consolidated Company results to generate a positive ROIC. The Selling segments results continue to be sufficient to support a positive ROIC on a Consolidated basis as reflected below:
-24-
Consolidated Operating Results
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Net sales |
$ | 436.9 | $ | 414.7 | ||||
Cost of product |
(289.4 | ) | (275.6 | ) | ||||
Distribution cost |
(36.2 | ) | (37.1 | ) | ||||
Gross profit on sales |
111.3 | 102.0 | ||||||
Selling expense |
(68.4 | ) | (63.5 | ) | ||||
General & administrative expense |
(20.9 | ) | (21.9 | ) | ||||
Corporate relocation expense |
(4.9 | ) | | |||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
(1.4 | ) | | |||||
Merchant discounts and provision for doubtful accounts |
(6.9 | ) | (2.4 | ) | ||||
Pre-opening expense |
(0.7 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||
Other expense |
(0.2 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||
Other income |
0.5 | 1.3 | ||||||
EBIT |
$ | 8.4 | $ | 14.5 | ||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||
Corporate relocation expense |
$ | 4.9 | $ | | ||||
Hurricane/flood expense |
1.4 | | ||||||
Adjusted EBIT (a) |
$ | 14.7 | $ | 14.5 | ||||
NOPAT Nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 (b) |
$ | 9.0 | $ | 8.8 | ||||
NOPAT Three months ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 (c) |
$ | (3.9 | ) | $ | (2.3 | ) | ||
NOPAT Rolling 12 months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 |
$ | 5.1 | $ | 6.5 | ||||
Invested capital |
||||||||
Debt |
$ | 5.9 | $ | 68.2 | ||||
Equity |
79.3 | 83.9 | ||||||
Total invested capital |
$ | 85.2 | $ | 152.1 | ||||
ROIC |
5.9 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||
(a) | Adjusted EBIT for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 excludes charges for corporate relocation and expenses related to hurricane and flood damage. | |||
(b) | NOPAT for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 excludes charges for corporate relocation and expenses related to hurricane and flood damage. | |||
(c) | NOPAT for the three months ended December 31, 2003 excludes the charge incurred for the sale of the Companys accounts receivable portfolio to GEBCS in December 2003. |
The improvement on a year-over-year basis in the Companys ROIC for the Selling Segment and Consolidated Company results is due to LESCOs sale of its accounts receivable portfolio to GEBCS in December 2003, which enabled the Company to reduce its invested capital.
-25-
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
A summary of the change in cash and cash equivalents (see Statement of Cash Flows included in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements) is as follows:
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, |
||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Cash
provided by (used in) operations |
$ | 17.5 | $ | (0.8 | ) | |||
Cash used in investing activities |
(1.5 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(15.5 | ) | 6.6 | |||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 0.5 | $ | 1.2 | ||||
The cash provided by operations in the first nine months of 2004 was generated predominantly through continued strong leverage of our accounts payable relative to our inventory balance. Additionally, we did not experience an increase in accounts receivable during the first nine months of 2004 even though sales have increased 5% over the same period in the prior year.
Accounts payable leverage is summarized as follows:
September 30, |
||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 63.5 | $ | 63.5 | ||||
Less: Payable to GEBCS |
(0.1 | ) | | |||||
Adjusted accounts payable |
$ | 63.4 | $ | 63.5 | ||||
Inventory |
$ | 110.9 | $ | 105.3 | ||||
Accounts payable leverage |
57.2 | % | 60.3 | % | ||||
Payable to GEBCS represents the portion of the receivable portfolio sold to GEBCS on December 30, 2003 that remains uncollected by GEBCS and secured by the Company.
Capital Expenditures: Our first nine months capital expenditures can be summarized as follows:
(Dollars in millions) |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
New Service Centers |
$ | 1.0 | $ | 1.1 | ||||
Manufacturing facilities and corporate systems |
2.1 | 3.5 | ||||||
$ | 3.1 | $ | 4.6 | |||||
Our capital needs going forward will be predominantly related to new Service Centers and maintaining information systems and manufacturing facilities.
Financing Activities
In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company entered into a $50 million Revolving Credit Facility (the Facility) which replaced a prior credit facility. Borrowings under the Facility were used to retire the prior credit facility, including a term loan, buy-out an interest rate swap agreement and buy-back outstanding preferred stock, including accrued dividends, all of which were outstanding at September 30, 2003.
-26-
The Facility matures December 30, 2006 and is secured by inventory, owned receivables, equipment, investment interests, real property interests, and general intangibles, including intellectual property. The Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.0% to 2.5% per annum, based on the level of borrowings, and requires the payment of a facility fee ranging from 0.4% to 0.5% per annum on the unused portion of availability. Availability under the Facility is determined by a borrowing base formula calculated on eligible inventory. As of September 30, 2004, there was $46.9 million available, with unused capacity of $36.3 million. Letters of credit, up to a maximum of $20 million, are also available under the Facility and are considered outstanding borrowings when calculating the unused portion of availability. Letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $10.6 million were outstanding as of September 30, 2004. Letter of credit fees range from 2.0% to 2.5% with an issuance fee ranging from 0.125% to 0.150%.
The interest rate, facility fee, letter of credit fee and letter of credit issuance fee are determined based on the Companys fixed charge coverage ratio. The Facility requires the maintenance of certain covenants, with the only financial covenant being the fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with the Facility covenants as of September 30, 2004.
We believe that the Companys financial condition is strong and that its cash balances, other liquid assets, operating cash flows, access to debt and equity capital markets and borrowing capacity, collectively, provide adequate resources to fund short-term and long-term operating requirements and future capital expenditures related to Service Center expansion and other projects. However, the Companys operating cash flow and access to the capital markets can be impacted by factors outside of its control.
Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
During the third quarter of 2004, LESCO entered into agreements to relocate its corporate headquarters from its current approximately 94,000 square foot facility in Strongsville, Ohio to an approximately 40,000 square foot facility in downtown Cleveland, Ohio. The term of the Companys new lease is five and a half years, and the Company expects to complete the relocation this year. A division of a public company (the Assignee) will assume the remaining 11 years of LESCOs current lease at the Strongsville location.
Relocation costs are estimated at approximately $7.5 million including $4.8 million in tenant and landlord inducements, and $2.7 million in broker commissions, legal fees, letter of credit costs, move costs and fixed-asset write offs. During the third quarter, the Company recorded $4.9 million of expense related to this relocation. Beginning in 2005, the financial effect of the relocation is expected to be accretive to earnings on an annual pre-tax basis by approximately $1.0 million. The return on the cost to relocate is estimated at greater than 7%.
LESCO remains liable under the lease if the Assignee fails to perform. The Assignee will be obligated to secure a $4.4 million letter of credit backing its performance under the lease, and LESCO will pay the Assignee approximately $100,000 annually for the remaining term of the lease to defray the cost of the letter of credit.
Subsequent to the balance sheet date, LESCO notified its supplier of methylene urea fertilizer that the Company will no longer operate under the terms of a supply agreement with the supplier. The five-year supply agreement between LESCO and its supplier was entered into in November 2002 and requires the Company to purchase annually 8,000 tons of methylene urea fertilizer from the supplier at a fixed conversion cost of $500 per ton plus the prevailing commodities market prices which were approximately $270 per ton for the first nine months of 2004. Management believes that it is advantageous to operating results to exit the supply agreement and currently estimates that the corresponding savings over the remaining term of the agreement will exceed the cost to exit the supply agreement. It is the Companys intent to source methylene urea fertilizer from other available market sources.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, intangible assets, long-lived assets, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management has discussed the development and selection of the critical accounting estimates, and the disclosures made herein, with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and its external auditors. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
-27-
The Companys significant accounting policies are described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The discussion and analysis of financial condition contains various references and disclosures concerning our accounting policies. Additionally, we have identified each of the following as a critical accounting policy, because (i) it has the potential to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements, (ii) of the significance of the financial item to which it relates, or (iii) it requires judgment and estimation due to the uncertainty involved in measuring at a specific point in time events which will be settled in the future.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when goods are shipped to the customer and title and risk of loss passes to the customer. We have consigned inventory agreements on certain products. We report gross revenue from sales of consigned inventory in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 99-19, Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent. Additionally, we have agency agreements with vendors for which we recognize sales net as an agent. Sales of consigned inventory were $10.4 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, and $26.7 million and $26.3 million for the corresponding nine month periods.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable consists primarily of amounts due from vendors under purchase rebate, cooperative advertising and other contractual programs and trade receivables not financed through outside programs. The Company earns product discounts under various supplier rebate programs, which are recorded as accounts receivable and credited to inventory valuation reserves when earned. The Company provides for expected losses from all owned and recourse accounts in the allowance for doubtful accounts. Expected losses are estimated based upon the number of days the accounts are past due, historical loss experience of the Company, historical loss experience of credit portfolios with characteristics similar to the Companys portfolio and the current business environment.
Inventories
Inventories are valued principally at the lower of cost (average cost method) or market. Procurement, warehousing and distribution costs are capitalized to inventory on hand and expensed to distribution cost when the inventory is sold. Vendor rebates earned on purchases are recorded as a reduction to inventory on hand and recognized when the inventory is sold. We have an inventory life cycle program that requires the classification of all Stock Keeping Units (SKUs) into one of five categories: active, watch, phase out, discontinued and liquidated. SKUs identified as discontinued are progressively marked-down to expected net realizable value over specific periods until the costs are marked down to zero. At that point, the products are liquidated. Estimated net realizable value of 20% of cost is based on historical sales of discontinued inventory. We maintain a reserve for inventory shrink, based on historical experience of 0.2% of sales. Actual shrink is charged against the reserve.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the liability method whereby income taxes are recognized during the fiscal year in which transactions enter into the determination of financial statement income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company assesses the recoverability of its deferred tax assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS 109). In accordance with that standard, the Company has provided a $2.7 million valuation allowance equal to its net deferred tax assets. The Company intends to maintain a full valuation allowance for its net deferred tax assets until sufficient positive evidence exists to support the reversal of some portion or the remainder of the allowance. Until such time, the Company will have no reported tax provision, net of valuation allowance adjustments. Any future decision to reverse a portion or all of the remaining valuation allowance will be based on consideration of several factors including, but not limited to, the Companys expectations regarding future taxable income and the Companys cumulative income or loss in the then most recent three-year period. In the event the Company was to determine, based on the existence of sufficient positive evidence, that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, a reduction of the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made.
Impairment of Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived and intangible assets by determining whether the amortization of the remaining balance over its remaining useful life can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows. If impairment exists, the carrying amount of the related asset is reduced to fair value.
In September 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. SFAS 142 provides that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are
-28-
no longer amortized but are reviewed annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite life will continue to be amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002. Upon adoption, the Company determined that goodwill impairment existed. The impairment loss was measured by evaluating the fair value of the goodwill using discounted cash flow appraisal models. These models indicated that the goodwill of $7.3 million was fully impaired. Upon the adoption of SFAS 142, the Company wrote off all of its goodwill and there is no amortization expense for goodwill recorded in the operating results for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
Accrued Liabilities
Certain accrued liabilities, including employee health insurance and workers compensation, are estimated based on historical experience and lag analysis due to the difference between the time the expense is incurred and when the expense is paid. A valuation analysis is performed to estimate the accrual required for property and casualty insurance claims expense.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements included in this report are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties and which are based on managements current beliefs, assumptions and expectations. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of predictive or future tense terms such as anticipate, estimate, expect, believe, project, may, will or similar terms. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Companys actual results may differ materially from those stated, implied or anticipated in the forward-looking statements, as a result of a number of factors that include, but are not limited to, the Companys ability to add new Service Centers in accordance with its plans, which can be affected by local zoning and other governmental regulations and its ability to find favorable store locations, to negotiate favorable leases, to hire qualified individuals to operate the Service Centers, and to integrate new Service Centers into the Companys systems; competitive factors in the Companys business, including pricing pressures; lack of availability or instability in the cost of raw materials which affects the costs of certain products; the Companys ability to impose price increases on customers without a significant loss in revenues; potential rate increases by third-party carriers which affects the cost of delivery of products; potential regulations; the Companys ability to effectively manufacture, market and distribute new products; the success of the Companys operating plans; regional weather conditions; and the condition of the industry and the economy. For a further discussion of risk factors, investors should refer to the Companys Securities and Exchange Commission reports, including but not limited to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk, principally interest rate risk. Market risk can be measured as the potential negative impact on earnings, cash flows or fair values resulting from a hypothetical change in interest rates over time. Interest paid on its debt is sensitive to changes in interest rates. The interest rate for the Companys revolving credit facility is variable, while the Companys long-term debt and the interest component of its operating leases is generally fixed.
The Company believes its potential exposure to interest rate risk is not material to the Companys financial position or the results of its operations. As of September 30, 2004, there had not been a material change in any of the market risk information disclosed by the Company in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. See Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk on page 28 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2004, for more detailed information regarding market risk.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company performed an evaluation under the supervision, and with the participation, of the Companys management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that
-29-
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that material information relating to the Company with respect to the period covered by this report was recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis.
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
During the quarter, there have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these controls.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Except as noted below, the items in Part II are inapplicable or, if applicable, would be answered in the negative. These items have been omitted and no other reference is made thereto.
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On July 14, 2003, an administrative complaint was filed against the Company by the State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) alleging violation of state law regarding the registration of pesticides. The complaint alleges that the Company distributed 3,440 bags of the Companys Dimension® Crabgrass Pre-emergent Plus Fertilizer to one of its retail customers in New York State without having proper registration therefor. The complaint seeks a civil penalty of $3,440,000. NYSDEC filed a similar complaint against the retail customer seeking a civil penalty of $3,440,000. The Company intends to indemnify the retail customer for such claim pursuant to a vendor agreement between the parties. The Company is in discussions with the NYSDEC relative to a settlement.
There are other legal actions, governmental investigations and proceedings pending to which the Company is a party or to which its property is subject. In the opinion of our management, after reviewing the information that is currently available with respect to these matters and consulting with counsel, any liability that may be ultimately incurred with respect to these matters is not expected to materially affect our consolidated financial condition.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a)
|
Exhibits | Exhibit 3(a) | Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (included as an exhibit to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Exhibit 3(b) | Amended Code of Regulations of the Registrant (included as an exhibit to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference). | |||||
Exhibit 10 (a) | Assignment and Assumption of Lease | |||||
Exhibit 10 (b) | Consent of Landlords Lender | |||||
Exhibit 31(a) | Michael P. DiMino Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification | |||||
Exhibit 31(b) | Jeffrey L. Rutherford Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification | |||||
Exhibit 32(a) | Michael P. DiMino Section 1350 Certification | |||||
Exhibit 32(b) | Jeffrey L. Rutherford Section 1350 Certification | |||||
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K: |
On August 5, 2004, the Company filed a report on Form 8-K relating to the Companys announcement of its decision to relocate its corporate offices and to the Companys Earnings Release for the second quarter ended June 30, 2004.
-30-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
LESCO, INC. | ||
Date: November 3, 2004
|
By: /s/ Jeffrey L. Rutherford | |
Jeffrey L. Rutherford | ||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, | ||
Treasurer and Secretary |
-31-