annual REPORT | 02
WHAT DOES IT TAKE ?
[CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC.® LOGO]
2 | | | FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS | ||
4 | | | LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS | ||
5 | | | EARNINGS GROWTH | ||
7 | | | EFFICIENCY | ||
9 | | | INNOVATIVE EXECUTION | ||
11 | | | RETAIL CONSUMER LENDER | ||
13 | | | COMMUNITY SERVICE | ||
16 | | | FORM 10-K AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
TO MAKE A GREAT BANK.
It takes a lot of things to be a truly superior bank. In this years annual report, we have highlighted five elements that will help us hit that target: high earnings growth; innovative execution in retail banking; leadership in retail consumer lending; and, finally, commitment to the communities we serve. As you read, we hope you will better understand what makes Charter One different, and why we have what it takes to deliver superior results to all of our stakeholders not only this year but in the years to come. |
core VALUES
OUR CORE VALUES ARE: | ||
WINNING ATTITUDE. By working together, we celebrate successes, welcome new challenges, realize and exceed the goals we set out to achieve. | ||
EFFICIENCY. Our strong work ethic, results-oriented culture, great product mix and ability to grow revenue while streamlining expenses provide us with a competitive advantage. | ||
INNOVATIVE EXECUTION. We anticipate, understand and respond to customer needs thanks to innovative products and services, and an aggressive, competitive sales culture. | ||
INTEGRITY. We pride ourselves on our honesty, respect for others and a refusal to be anything less than totally responsible for our actions. | ||
INCLUSIVE RELATIONSHIPS. The Charter One team values, supports and encourages the contributions of all employees. | ||
COMMUNITY COMMITMENT. We strive to be involved in our communities by providing affordable financial products and services and by infusing our internal Charter One community with a strong sense of purpose and maintenance of inclusive relationships. |
2 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
about CHARTER ONE | |||
Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, Charter One is one of the best retail banks in the country, focusing on the financial needs of the average consumer and local small- to medium-sized businesses. Ranking among the 25 largest banks in the U.S., it operates through 461 retail banking centers located in Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Vermont and Massachusetts. The Companys diverse product set includes: consumer banking, indirect auto finance, commercial leasing, business lending, commercial real estate lending, mortgage banking, and retail investment products. |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 1,169,830 | $ | 990,416 | $ | 903,035 | ||||||
Other income |
547,546 | 473,624 | 392,871 | |||||||||
Administrative expenses |
678,972 | 629,662 | 603,955 | |||||||||
Net income |
577,668 | 500,714 | 433,962 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share(1) |
2.45 | 2.10 | 1.81 | |||||||||
Return on average assets |
1.47 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.36 | % | ||||||
Return on average equity |
19.38 | % | 18.17 | % | 18.00 | % | ||||||
Return on average tangible equity |
22.31 | % | 20.25 | % | 19.99 | % | ||||||
Efficiency ratio |
39.54 | % | 41.91 | % | 45.68 | % | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 41,896,072 | $ | 38,174,516 | $ | 32,971,427 | ||||||
Loans and leases, net |
26,204,738 | 25,728,700 | 24,008,174 | |||||||||
Total deposits |
27,527,843 | 25,123,309 | 19,605,671 | |||||||||
Shareholders equity |
3,083,825 | 2,928,500 | 2,456,204 | |||||||||
Shareholders equity to assets |
7.36 | % | 7.67 | % | 7.45 | % | ||||||
(1) Restated for stock dividends
4 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
letter to SHAREHOLDERS
Dear friends of Charter One: Wrapping up a year always leads to comparisons comparisons to budget, comparisons to last year, comparisons to peers, and comparisons to what we see coming for next year and beyond. | ||
Any way you look at 2002, it was a terrific year. Against a backdrop of challenges presented by declining interest rates and a softening economy, we continued our momentum in building a great retail banking franchise. We hit nearly every goal we set for ourselves in 2002, and our performance stands tall next to any peer. Perhaps more important, were very well positioned for 2003 and beyond. | ||
2002 will be remembered as the year Charter One converted to a national bank charter, officially leaving our thrift heritage behind. We have clarified our niche, and are being described as a high-performing retail bank that couples superior sales execution with an obsessive focus on efficiency. Emerging early in the year as a newly minted national bank led to a great deal of positive recognition for much of what weve been working on for several years. During 2002, the American Banker honored us by selecting us as its Innovator of the Year, and we were featured in the Platinum 400 List of Americas Best Big Companies published by Forbes magazine. | ||
The year 2002 was marked by a 17% increase in earnings per share, driven by a 17% increase in top-line revenue. If we adjust for the accounting change which eliminated goodwill expense in 2002, earnings per share would have been up 13%. Once again we followed the time-proven adage of growing revenue faster than expenses. Our basic business plan has remained dedicated to that goal for nearly a decade. Charter Ones cost culture has long been recognized as among the best in banking. But the focus of our plan has truly been top-line revenue. The emphasis on core deposit growth and household acquisition helps drive retail banking revenue and support net interest income, while increasing the value of our franchise. On the lending side, we drive revenue by dealing directly with customers and providing the products they need. We continue to work diligently to remix the loan portfolio, moving away from single-family loans yet retaining a concentration in consumer-oriented products. Over time, we believe our cost efficiency and retail focused strategy will deliver the best value to all of our stakeholders stockholders, employees, customers and communities. |
earnings GROWTH
WHAT DOES IT TAKE ? |
TO GENERATE A SUPERIOR
RATE OF TOTAL RETURN?
87% |
total return on common stock over the past three years |
a. | Over the past three years, Charter Ones common stock has generated a total return of 87%, while the Lehman Brothers Bank Universe Index returned 24% and the S&P 500 lost 40%. We believe a long track record of consistent, high-quality earnings growth is the most important driver of stock appreciation over time. Delivering that earnings record and resulting stock appreciation requires certain necessary components be in place. At Charter One, we begin with an obsessive sales focus to ensure strong revenue growth. Last year, top-line revenues increased 17%, more than double our expense growth. Our operations are among the most efficient in the industry, enabling us to outperform others and generate record earnings without taking on unnecessary risks. Because of this potent combination of high growth, low risk and low costs, we can meet our earnings targets with minimal asset growth. This, in turn, provides us with tremendous capital flexibility to continue this enviable and profitable cycle. |
6 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
One of the biggest highlights of the year was the tremendous value coming out of our retail residential lending operations. While we have a long-standing objective of reducing the single-family component within our balance sheet, we continue to emphasize originating residential loans. | ||
Providing home mortgages is one of the best ways to open access to new customers. The point of sale contact with those customers provides us the very best opportunities to cross-sell both home equity lines of credit and high-balance core deposits, both of which help feed top-line revenue. Our retail residential lending originations totaled over $10 billion in 2002, substantially all of which was originated directly to retail customers. | ||
Because of our strong sales culture, we typically do well in a declining rate environment as refinance activity jumps up. Not only do we do a great job of capturing our own refinances, we tend to win a disproportionate share of refinances from our competition. In essence, we enjoy our status as an excess asset generator originating more product than we need to meet our balance sheet targets. During 2002, the value of our operation was most visible in the unusually high gains from the sale of mortgage-backed securities, which included primarily bank-originated product. Although this revenue stream is transitory in nature, and a direct by-product of this low-interest rate environment, it enabled Charter One to absorb additional costs related to loan loss and mortgage servicing rights valuation allowances. Most important, the gains allowed us to keep our deposit strategy intact by reinvesting in the retail franchise through product design and pricing support. | ||
Industry wide, loan portfolio growth was hard to come by in 2002. Certainly the lower rates resulted in a flood of activity as homeowners refinanced their homes; but other areas of originations slowed considerably. Businesses reduced capital expenditures, and consumers used home refinances to reduce other debt, which translated into very little overall portfolio growth. |
EFFICIENCY
WHAT DOES IT TAKE ? |
TO BE ONE OF THE INDUSTRYS
MOST EFFICIENT RETAIL BANKS?
40% |
this efficiency ratio provides tremendous pricing power |
a. | The successful execution of our business plan is based on our position as one of the industrys low-cost providers. We enjoy as much as a 15 point advantage over our peers, enabling us to generate higher earnings with lower levels of financial and credit risk. But cost control is only part of the story. Our highly efficient operation is also the platform of our consumer banking strategy; it provides us with a tremendous pricing advantage that we use every day to aggressively compete for loans and deposits, grow revenues, capture new households and build market share. The final component that helps explain why revenues grow faster than expenses at Charter One is our employees. Last year, net income per Charter One employee was $83,000 compared to $50,000 for our peers. Put simply, Charter One employees deliver. |
8 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
But at Charter One, the non-single family portfolio increased by 13% in 2002 thanks to growth in all our consumer-related product lines, especially home equity and auto loans. Balances outstanding in home equity lines increased by nearly 40%, quite an accomplishment during a wave of home refinances. | ||
Our success has been driven by using the point-of-sale on the first mortgage to capture the line of credit, followed up by very targeted offerings that encourage utilization. The auto portfolio turned out to be an outperformer as well, posting growth of nearly 30%. We believe our approach to strict credit control and extremely low operating costs provides a nice short-term asset that beats the optionality of residential mortgages. We ended 2002 with approximately 33% of our loan portfolio in single-family mortgages. Looking out a few years, we think that can be reduced to 15%. | ||
Of course, portfolio growth at any cost can end up costing a great deal if the credit profile erodes. Given all the turmoil in the economy during 2002, we were extremely happy with the performance of our lending operations. Overall charge-offs came in at .48% of average loans for the year, including $27 million in accelerated charge-offs related to a change in policy associated with our charter conversion. Absent that change in policy, our charge-off ratio would have been a very respectable and industry-low .37%. Building up the loan and lease loss reserve has been a priority for the past few years given the state of the economy and the remixing of our balance sheet. At the end of 2002, it represented 1.24% of our total loan portfolio, up from .98% at the end of 2001. | ||
Deposit growth continued to be one of the clearest measurements of our retail success. Over the past two years, weve added $8 billion in deposits, including a phenomenal $5.5 billion in deposit growth from same store sales. That same-store sales growth equates to a 28% increase in deposits away from acquisitions and building new branches. Clearly, this is one of the best track records in the country. During 2002, we focused most heavily on adding core deposits, or deposits in checking, money market and savings accounts. The goal is to reach new households and attract that households primary account. Our core deposits increased more than $3 billion, up more than 20%! In addition to building franchise value, this deposit growth fueled a 14% increase in deposit-related revenue. |
INNOVATIVE execution
WHAT DOES IT TAKE ? |
TO BE A HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE RETAIL BANK?
23% |
increase in checking account deposits |
a. | Banking is our profession, but sales is our business. We reinforce this commitment through our rewards and compensation systems, accountability on both an individual and office-wide basis, employee training and sharing of best practices. This focus last year helped drive a 23% increase in checking account deposits (which is the largest component of core deposits), over a year earlier. We also effectively use all of our sales channels: our online bank has enrolled 400,000 users in two years, 30% of whom hold checking accounts. Our grocery store branches are the best performing in the industry, while ongoing deposit and lending sales efforts continue to deliver tremendous results at all of our 461 banking centers. Finally, we have an industry-leading cross-sell track record. Last year, 60% of all new mortgages came attached with home equity lines, and 38% of all new mortgages came attached with high-balance core accounts. |
10 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
Our focus will remain essentially the same in 2003, working on core deposit growth but emphasizing the checking account products even more than in the past. Today, our deposit mix includes 65% in core deposits, including 35% of the total in checking account products. | ||
Over the next few years, wed like to see that move to 70% core and 40% checking. Whats more, the initiatives are in place to accomplish that. | ||
The underpinning of our overall business model, as well as any initiative we launch, is the compelling advantage of our operating efficiency. We have consistently operated with one of the lowest efficiency ratios in the industry. That gives us a vitally important advantage when competing for customers, and we use that advantage to win households. We offer attractive pricing on deposit and home equity products, along with an unparalleled bundle of free services to acquire and retain households. Additionally, that advantage enables us to originate loans in the safer end of the credit spectrum, giving up a little yield to take on less credit risk. In essence, our operating efficiency allows us to live with a lower net interest margin than our peers. | ||
Given our focus on top-line revenue growth, you should know how we intend to continue that growth over the next several years. We are describing the future growth path as, Buy, Grow and Build. | ||
Buy As many of you know, we cut our teeth on acquiring institutions and instilling our sales culture to generate above average growth. Our last significant acquisition was in 1999, when our St. Paul Bancorp merger brought us to Chicago. Since then, we have completed or announced four small acquisitions within existing markets. We think these in-fill opportunities not only contribute nicely to our revenue growth, they further strengthen our retail franchise. We will continue to pursue similar transactions as they become available. |
retail consumer LENDER
WHAT DOES IT TAKE ? |
TO BE A TOP RETAIL
CONSUMER LENDER?
11th |
being the 11th largest retail residential originator creates terrific cross-selling opportunities |
a. | For some mortgage originators, residential lending is an end in itself. At Charter One, residential lending is a core competency because mortgages provide us with tremendous selling opportunities. That is, we use mortgages to cross-sell our retail products. Being the nations 11th largest retail residential lender also has other advantages: we receive a sizable earnings stream from mortgage loans we service for others. Ironically, as critical as mortgage originations are to obtaining retail customers, we do not rely on residential mortgages to grow our balance sheet. Instead, we rely on shorter duration, non-single family loans such as home equity lines of credit, commercial loans and auto loans. |
12 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
Grow Since 2000, much of our growth has come from same store sales, grabbing market share every day with our aggressive sales approach. We have a number of initiatives planned for 2003 that should keep that momentum going, ranging from fine tuning our mail programs to new product launches. | ||
Build Now its time to take what weve learned and earned in terms of experience, expertise and infrastructure, and devote that energy to building new branches. We ended 2002 with 461 branches, 411 traditional centers and 50 in-store centers. Over the next 18 months, we expect to add approximately 125 branches, 28 traditional centers and 97 in-stores. While these new branches will be sprinkled throughout our franchise, they will be concentrated in Western New York and Ohio. The focus on the in-store channel is prompted by the tremendous success weve had thus far with that model. That success has provided us the opportunity to strike innovative partnerships with ideal retail chains. In our view, this constitutes a low-risk approach to De Novo branching that will quickly contribute to top-line revenue. We are very excited about this new phase in Charter Ones retail strategy, and think it will pay great dividends. | ||
My final remarks in this years annual report letter deal with Charter Ones corporate governance and core values. Over the past several years, we have taken a hard look at many of the issues revolving around corporate governance. We believe that prudent corporate governance provides an important framework for a healthy environment. Our current guidelines reflect much of what we view as critical in that framework. We are fortunate to have a strongly independent group of highly qualified directors, who take an active interest in Charter One. And I thank them for their dedication over the past year. |
community SERVICE
WHAT DOES IT TAKE ? |
TO BE A PART OF THE
COMMUNITIES WE SERVE?
338 |
organizations supported company-wide |
a. | To be an important part of the community, you must be an integral part. Our charitable giving programs in which we support over 338 organizations company-wide is substantial, wide-ranging and is comprised of both financial and time commitments to help improve the effectiveness of the organizations we support. Of particular importance is our commitment to reducing the barriers to realizing the American dream of home ownership for low- to moderate-income individuals. We offer a combination of financial support, planning assistance, technical expertise and community development investments, as well as a vast range of loan products and services. Additionally, we work with leading community development groups to effectively direct our investments and community efforts. Our corporate-wide inclusion initiatives last year yielded impressive results: we developed very strong business partnerships with various minority- and women-owned businesses, increasing both the number and dollars spent with these groups; and we have hired more employees who reflect the increasingly diverse communities we serve. |
14 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
Similarly, Charter One has long embraced certain core values as a foundation of our business and moral standards. Given the recent spate of corporate calamities, we believed it was important that we codify those values and endorse them for our employees, customers and shareholders. We intend to leave no room for interpretation as to how we conduct ourselves, or our business. We have chosen to highlight these values on the inside cover of this annual report. I encourage you to read them, and I expect you to hold us accountable to them. Adhering to these standards should help ensure success for a long time to come. | ||
Id also like to publicly recognize and thank our 7,000 hard-working employees. Charter Ones employees continue to achieve industry-leading results by demonstrating industry-leading dedication, enthusiasm and innovation, which come together to make Charter One a truly superior retail bank. | ||
Thank you so much for your continued interest in Charter One. | ||
/s/ Bud Koch | ||
Charles John Bud Koch Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer February 21, 2003 |
left to right | [PHOTO OF COMPANY OFFICERS] | ||
Richard W. Neu CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
|||
Mark D. Grossi CHIEF RETAIL OFFICER |
|||
John D. Koch CHIEF CREDIT OFFICER |
|||
Charles John Bud Koch CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
WHAT DOES IT TAKE ? TO MAKE A GREAT BANK.
high earnings growth |
innovative execution in retail banking |
leadership in retail consumer lending |
commitment to the communities we serve |
16 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
form 10-K AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
selected FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as the audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected financial data presented below is not necessarily indicative of future results due to, among other things, the effect of acquisitions. For a discussion of the impact of recent business combinations and branch acquisitions, see Notes 3 and 19 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Per share data has been restated to reflect all stock dividends and stock splits as of December 31, 2002.
At and for the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||
Financial condition: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, federal funds sold and other |
$ | 447,213 | $ | 516,520 | $ | 531,257 | $ | 693,532 | $ | 722,260 | ||||||||||
Investment securities |
214,068 | 135,586 | 449,215 | 542,081 | 629,072 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
12,077,389 | 9,014,416 | 5,593,371 | 6,100,380 | 5,570,286 | |||||||||||||||
Loans and leases, net |
26,204,738 | 25,728,700 | 24,008,174 | 22,312,850 | 22,219,411 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
2,952,664 | 2,779,294 | 2,389,410 | 2,170,220 | 1,339,178 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 41,896,072 | $ | 38,174,516 | $ | 32,971,427 | $ | 31,819,063 | $ | 30,480,207 | ||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 27,527,843 | $ | 25,123,309 | $ | 19,605,671 | $ | 19,073,975 | $ | 19,023,700 | ||||||||||
FHLB advances |
9,037,925 | 8,657,238 | 9,636,277 | 9,226,150 | 7,512,203 | |||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
992,765 | 507,669 | 547,134 | 515,574 | 1,009,954 | |||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
1,253,714 | 957,800 | 726,141 | 605,664 | 549,314 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
3,083,825 | 2,928,500 | 2,456,204 | 2,397,700 | 2,385,036 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 41,896,072 | $ | 38,174,516 | $ | 32,971,427 | $ | 31,819,063 | $ | 30,480,207 | ||||||||||
Results of operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 2,286,461 | $ | 2,378,246 | $ | 2,247,088 | $ | 2,128,455 | $ | 2,130,332 | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,116,631 | 1,387,830 | 1,344,053 | 1,194,351 | 1,244,108 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
1,169,830 | 990,416 | 903,035 | 934,104 | 886,224 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
192,003 | 100,766 | 54,205 | 35,237 | 31,325 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease
losses |
977,827 | 889,650 | 848,830 | 898,867 | 854,899 | |||||||||||||||
Other income |
547,546 | 473,624 | 392,871 | 228,206 | 177,736 | |||||||||||||||
Administrative expenses |
678,972 | 629,662 | 603,955 | 633,327 | 665,340 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
846,401 | 733,612 | 637,746 | 493,746 | 367,295 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
268,733 | 232,898 | 203,784 | 159,770 | 123,229 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 500,714 | $ | 433,962 | $ | 333,976 | $ | 244,066 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 2.52 | $ | 2.15 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 1.35 | $ | .99 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 2.45 | $ | 2.10 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 1.32 | $ | .96 |
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 17
At and for the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||
Performance returns: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets |
1.47 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.08 | % | .82 | % | |||||||||||
Return on average equity |
19.38 | 18.17 | 18.00 | 13.50 | 10.26 | ||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio |
39.54 | 41.91 | 45.68 | 50.69 | 57.79 | ||||||||||||||||
Other data: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Loan servicing portfolio |
$ | 16,893,609 | $ | 13,846,807 | $ | 10,379,644 | $ | 10,798,563 | $ | 9,916,922 | |||||||||||
Book value per share |
13.72 | 12.43 | 10.70 | 9.90 | 9.62 | ||||||||||||||||
Tangible book value per share |
11.86 | 10.92 | 9.94 | 9.11 | 8.97 | ||||||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio |
33.88 | % | 33.81 | % | 33.15 | % | 38.64 | % | 45.83 | % | |||||||||||
Net yield on average interest-earning assets |
3.19 | 3.00 | 3.02 | 3.19 | 3.11 | ||||||||||||||||
Average shareholders equity to average assets |
7.59 | 7.76 | 7.58 | 7.99 | 7.96 | ||||||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity to total assets |
7.36 | 7.67 | 7.45 | 7.54 | 7.82 | ||||||||||||||||
Total tangible shareholders equity to total assets |
6.36 | 6.74 | 6.92 | 6.93 | 7.29 | ||||||||||||||||
Number of offices: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Full service branches |
461 | 456 | 419 | 417 | 405 | ||||||||||||||||
Loan production offices |
26 | 29 | 32 | 36 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||
Number of employees (FTEs) |
6,997 | 6,850 | 6,573 | 7,055 | 7,104 |
18 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
financial REVIEW
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following financial review presents an analysis of the asset and liability structure of Charter One Financial, Inc. and a discussion of the results of operations for each of the periods presented in the Annual Report. The data presented in the following pages should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report.
HOLDING COMPANY BUSINESS
Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, Charter One Financial, Inc., hereafter referred to as Charter One or the Company, is a financial holding company. Charter One is a Delaware corporation and owns all of the outstanding capital stock of Charter One Bank, N.A., which we sometimes refer to in this document as the Bank. The Banks primary business is providing consumer banking services to certain major markets in Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, New York, Vermont and in some markets of Massachusetts. At the end of 2002, the Bank and its subsidiaries were doing business through 461 full-service branches, 26 loan production offices and 913 ATMs.
On January 7, 2002, Charter One Bank, F.S.B. filed an application with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to convert from a thrift to a national bank. The conversion was effective May 7, 2002 and resulted in changing the Banks name to Charter One Bank, N.A. from Charter One Bank, F.S.B. References to Charter One Bank or the Bank shall mean Charter One Bank, N.A. or Charter One Bank, F.S.B. as the context requires.
RECENT ACQUISITIONS
On May 24, 2002, the Company completed its acquisition of Charter National Bancorp, Inc., the holding company of Charter Bank in Wyandotte, Michigan. On May 24, 2002, Charter National had assets of $353.2 million and deposits of $242.3 million in eight branches located south of Detroit, Michigan. The Company paid $90.4 million in cash consideration and recorded $34.8 million of goodwill based on a preliminary determination of the estimated fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired as a result of this transaction. Additionally, the Company recorded $25.0 million as an indefinite-lived trademark name intangible. The Company accounted for this acquisition as a purchase, and included the results of operations of Charter National in its Consolidated Financial Statements from the effective date of the acquisition. The merger of Charter Bank into the Bank was effective August 9, 2002.
On January 16, 2003, the Boards of Directors of the Company and Advance Bancorp, Inc. announced a definitive agreement pursuant to which the Company will acquire Advance Bancorp for $72 million in Charter One common stock. Advance Bank, the principal subsidiary of Advance Bancorp, is a state-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Lansing, Illinois with approximately $632 million in assets, $491 million in deposits, and 14 branch offices located in Cook County, Illinois. The merger, which will be accounted for as a purchase, is expected to close in the second or third quarter of 2003. The transaction is subject to required bank regulatory approvals and approval by Advance Bancorp shareholders.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
For the year ended December 31, 2002, Charter One reported net income of $577.7 million, compared to $500.7 million and $434.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. On a diluted per share basis, net income was $2.45, $2.10 and $1.81 in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 19
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income is the difference between the interest and dividend income earned on our loans and investments and the interest expense on our deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is our principal source of earnings. Net interest income is affected by a number of factors including the level, pricing and maturity of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, interest rate fluctuations and asset quality, as well as general economic conditions and regulatory policies.
The following table shows average balances, interest earned or paid, and average interest rates for the periods indicated. Nonaccrual loans and leases are included in the average balance of loans and leases. The mark-to-market adjustments on securities available for sale are included in noninterest-earning assets. Noninterest-bearing demand deposit accounts are included in noninterest-bearing liabilities. The cost of liabilities includes the annualized effect of interest rate risk management instruments.
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avg. | Avg. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Balance | Interest | Cost | Balance | Interest | Cost | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and leases |
$ | 25,647,597 | $ | 1,671,843 | 6.52 | % | $ | 25,463,666 | $ | 1,872,270 | 7.35 | % | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale |
9,194,477 | 519,821 | 5.65 | 5,574,832 | 366,475 | 6.57 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Held to maturity |
725,164 | 47,747 | 6.58 | 1,243,975 | 86,952 | 6.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading |
| | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale |
172,674 | 11,495 | 6.66 | 138,811 | 11,180 | 8.05 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Held to maturity |
4,824 | 252 | 5.23 | 7,853 | 409 | 5.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets |
894,898 | 35,303 | 3.89 | 628,560 | 40,960 | 6.43 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
36,639,634 | 2,286,461 | 6.24 | 33,057,697 | 2,378,246 | 7.19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
(268,654 | ) | (211,859 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-earning assets |
2,877,215 | 2,651,957 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 39,248,195 | $ | 35,497,795 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Checking accounts |
$ | 6,278,844 | 133,393 | 2.12 | % | $ | 3,867,767 | 118,800 | 3.07 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Money market and savings accounts |
8,084,926 | 173,931 | 2.15 | 6,433,557 | 207,586 | 3.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
10,054,727 | 347,492 | 3.46 | 10,230,112 | 528,897 | 5.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
24,418,497 | 654,816 | 2.68 | 20,531,436 | 855,283 | 4.17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
8,233,376 | 416,864 | 5.06 | 9,361,225 | 498,444 | 5.32 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
732,466 | 44,951 | 6.12 | 515,345 | 34,103 | 6.58 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total borrowings |
8,965,842 | 461,815 | 5.15 | 9,876,570 | 532,547 | 5.39 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing
liabilities |
33,384,339 | 1,116,631 | 3.34 | 30,408,006 | 1,387,830 | 4.56 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposit accounts |
1,816,036 | 1,477,294 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities |
1,066,934 | 856,906 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest-bearing
liabilities |
2,882,970 | 2,334,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
36,267,309 | 32,742,206 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
2,980,886 | 2,755,589 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 39,248,195 | $ | 35,497,795 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 1,169,830 | $ | 990,416 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate spread |
2.90 | % | 2.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net yield on average interest-earning
assets |
3.19 | % | 3.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities |
109.75 | % | 108.71 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
[Additional columns below]
[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2000 | |||||||||||||||
Avg. | |||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Balance | Interest | Cost | ||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|||||||||||||||
Loans and leases |
$ | 23,830,266 | $ | 1,810,608 | 7.60 | % | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|||||||||||||||
Available for sale |
3,342,744 | 241,369 | 7.22 | ||||||||||||
Held to maturity |
1,690,002 | 120,812 | 7.15 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
|||||||||||||||
Trading |
183 | 38 | 20.67 | ||||||||||||
Available for sale |
458,299 | 33,412 | 7.29 | ||||||||||||
Held to maturity |
29,008 | 1,594 | 5.49 | ||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets |
543,450 | 39,255 | 7.10 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
29,893,952 | 2,247,088 | 7.51 | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
(185,623 | ) | |||||||||||||
Noninterest-earning assets |
2,097,990 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 31,806,319 | |||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
|||||||||||||||
Checking accounts |
$ | 2,394,554 | 57,229 | 2.39 | % | ||||||||||
Money market and savings accounts |
5,401,048 | 168,379 | 3.12 | ||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
9,821,168 | 540,501 | 5.50 | ||||||||||||
Total deposits |
17,616,770 | 766,109 | 4.35 | ||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
9,309,296 | 532,583 | 5.71 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
613,875 | 45,361 | 7.32 | ||||||||||||
Total borrowings |
9,923,171 | 577,944 | 5.81 | ||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing
liabilities |
27,539,941 | 1,344,053 | 4.88 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||
Demand deposit accounts |
1,238,086 | ||||||||||||||
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities |
616,804 | ||||||||||||||
Total noninterest-bearing
liabilities |
1,854,890 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
29,394,831 | ||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
2,411,488 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 31,806,319 | |||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 903,035 | |||||||||||||
Interest rate spread |
2.63 | % | |||||||||||||
Net yield on average interest-earning
assets |
3.02 | % | |||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities |
108.55 | % | |||||||||||||
20 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
The following rate/volume analysis shows the approximate relative contribution of changes in average interest rates and volume to changes in net interest income for the periods indicated. Changes not solely attributable to volume or rate have been allocated in proportion to the changes due to volume and rate. Amortization of net deferred loan costs and automobile dealer reserves included as a reduction in interest income was $101.2 million, $81.0 million, and $55.1 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS
Year Ended December 31, 2002 v. 2001 | Year Ended December 31, 2001 v. 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Decrease) due to | (Decrease) due to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Rate | Volume | Total | Rate | Volume | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and leases |
$ | (214,351 | ) | $ | 13,924 | $ | (200,427 | ) | $ | (64,103 | ) | $ | 125,765 | $ | 61,662 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale |
(57,201 | ) | 210,547 | 153,346 | (23,334 | ) | 148,440 | 125,106 | ||||||||||||||||||
Held to maturity |
(4,788 | ) | (34,417 | ) | (39,205 | ) | (2,628 | ) | (31,232 | ) | (33,860 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading |
| | | (19 | ) | (19 | ) | (38 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Available for sale |
(2,136 | ) | 2,451 | 315 | 3,181 | (25,413 | ) | (22,232 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Held to maturity |
| (157 | ) | (157 | ) | (79 | ) | (1,106 | ) | (1,185 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets |
(19,467 | ) | 13,810 | (5,657 | ) | (4,066 | ) | 5,771 | 1,705 | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
(297,943 | ) | 206,158 | (91,785 | ) | (91,048 | ) | 222,206 | 131,158 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Checking accounts |
(44,187 | ) | 58,780 | 14,593 | 28,672 | 32,899 | 61,571 | |||||||||||||||||||
Money market and savings accounts |
(86,949 | ) | 53,294 | (33,655 | ) | (7,822 | ) | 47,029 | 39,207 | |||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
(172,486 | ) | (8,919 | ) | (181,405 | ) | (33,554 | ) | 21,950 | (11,604 | ) | |||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
(22,515 | ) | (59,065 | ) | (81,580 | ) | (37,439 | ) | 3,300 | (34,139 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
(7,933 | ) | 18,781 | 10,848 | (7,085 | ) | (4,173 | ) | (11,258 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
(334,070 | ) | 62,871 | (271,199 | ) | (57,228 | ) | 101,005 | 43,777 | |||||||||||||||||
Change in net interest income |
$ | 36,127 | $ | 143,287 | $ | 179,414 | $ | (33,820 | ) | $ | 121,201 | $ | 87,381 | |||||||||||||
Our net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $1.2 billion, an increase of $179.4 million, or 18.1%, over the $990.4 million for 2001. The increase in net interest income was primarily attributed to the reduction in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from 4.56% in 2001 to 3.34% in 2002. The reduction in the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities resulted primarily from the repricing of higher interest rate certificates of deposits during 2002, together with the downward repricing and increase in volume of certain core deposits.
Our net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $990.4 million, an increase of $87.4 million, or 9.7%, over the $903.0 million for 2000. The yield on interest-earning assets declined to 7.19% in 2001 from 7.51% in 2000. However, interest-earning assets increased $3.2 billion in 2001 due to acquisitions and internal growth. The increase in interest-earning assets more than offset the downward pricing of assets in this lower interest rate environment. The increase in net interest income was also attributed to the reduction in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities from 4.88% in 2000 to 4.56% in 2001.
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
The provision for loan and lease losses in 2002 was $192.0 million, an increase of $91.2 million from 2001. The increased provision during 2002 was necessary to cover higher charge-offs and maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level considered adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. Additionally, the provision for loan and lease losses was increased to reflect the continued weakening in the national economy during 2002 and continuing change in our loan mix. Net charge-offs totaled $122.6 million in 2002, compared to $68.7 million in 2001. The $122.6 million of net charge-offs for 2002 includes $27.3 million in gross charge-offs recorded in the second quarter in conjunction with Charter Ones adoption of a new consumer loan charge-off policy. As part of the Banks conversion in May 2002 to a national bank, the Company conformed various policies and reporting practices associated with asset quality to more closely compare to those of its commercial bank peers. These changes neither increased nor decreased ultimate net loan and lease charge-offs. They only affected the timing of recognizing net
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 21
consumer asset charge-offs through the allowance for loan and lease losses and the disclosure of underperforming consumer assets. Consumer assets include single-family, retail consumer, automobile and consumer finance loan portfolios. These changes had no impact on Charter Ones non-consumer loan portfolios, which include commercial real estate and corporate loans and its lease portfolio.
The most significant effect of the change in charge-off policy was in the automobile and consumer finance portfolios. Prior to the second quarter of 2002, automobile loans were charged off at the point of repossessed collateral disposition. Beginning with the second quarter of 2002, consistent with OCC-regulated banking practices, automobile loans going through repossession or bankruptcies were written down to the net realizable value of the collateral at the time of the repossession or bankruptcy discharge. Any automobile loan that reached the 120-day delinquency point was charged off completely. Charge-offs in the consumer finance portfolio were previously recognized at the point of foreclosure. Beginning with the second quarter of 2002, consistent with OCC-regulated banking practices, consumer finance loans, along with other loans backed by single-family residential real estate collateral, were reflected at the lower of cost or net realizable value at the earliest point of six payments past due or foreclosure.
The ratio of net charge-offs as a percent of average loans and leases increased 21 basis points to .48% in 2002 from .27% in 2001. Excluding the impact of the change in charge-off policy discussed above, net charge-offs as a percent of average loans and leases were .37% in 2002, as compared to .27% in 2001. The increase in net charge-offs, excluding the impact of the change in charge-off policy, was primarily attributed to a continued weakening in the national economy during 2002 and the continuing change in our loan mix.
The provision for loan and lease losses in 2001 was $100.8 million, an increase of $46.6 million from 2000. The increased provision during 2001 was necessary to cover higher charge-offs and maintain the allowance for loan and leases losses at a level considered adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. Net charge-offs totaled $68.7 million in 2001, compared to $51.0 million in 2000. The ratio of net charge-offs as a percent of average loans and leases increased six basis points to .27% in 2001 from .21% in 2000. The increase in net charge-offs was primarily attributed to a general weakening in the national economy. Additionally, the provision for loan and lease losses was increased to reflect the continuing change in our loan mix.
See Financial Condition-Loans and Leases below and Note 6 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our allowance for loan and lease losses.
OTHER INCOME
Other income for 2002 was $547.5 million, compared to $473.6 million for 2001. This $73.9 million, or 15.6%, increase was primarily attributable to income from retail banking and net gains, partially offset by a decline in mortgage banking income. Retail banking income increased $38.8 million, or 13.3%, over 2001. The growth was attributed to successful integration of our recent mergers and branch acquisitions, together with ongoing franchise development initiatives. Additionally, we experienced increases in transaction-related revenues. Net gains were $205.0 million in 2002, compared to $114.3 million in 2001. The mortgage-backed securities sold during the year consisted primarily of bank-originated, residential mortgage and consumer products, as we generated significantly more residential mortgage and consumer loans than we needed to meet our balance sheet size and mix objectives. We did not utilize any special-purpose entities for the sale of any of our mortgage-backed securities. Offsetting the gains on sales of mortgage-backed securities of $259.0 million was a $28.8 million loss on debt termination and a $25.9 million net unrealized loss on interest rate swaps that do not qualify for hedge accounting under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. The $25.9 million net unrealized loss on interest rate swaps was the result of the decline in interest rates since the issuance of the interest rate swaps in May 2002.
Mortgage banking income was a loss of $18.5 million in 2002, as compared to income of $24.9 million in 2001. With respect to the decline in mortgage banking income, we recorded an impairment charge of $4.5 million and increased the valuation allowance on loan servicing assets by $77.1 million in 2002 to an ending balance of $103.9 million, due to increased prepayment speeds resulting from higher levels of refinancing. Total mortgage banking income, excluding the $4.5 million impairment charge and $77.1 million increase to the valuation allowance, was $63.1 million in 2002. In 2001, mortgage banking income totaled $49.5 million, excluding a $24.6 million increase in the valuation allowance. Excluding the impairment charge and increases to the valuation allowance in 2002 and 2001, mortgage banking income increased 27.4% year over year. As a result of continued strong loan origination and securitization activity in 2002, the portfolio of loans serviced for others increased to $16.9 billion, up 22.0% from 2001. The related loan servicing asset was .76% of the portfolio at $128.6 million. With an average servicing spread of 35 basis points, that translates into a loan servicing asset valuation of 2.17 times the servicing spread.
22 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
Other income for 2001 was $473.6 million, compared to $392.9 million for 2000. This $80.8 million, or 20.6%, increase was primarily attributable to income from retail banking and net gains on sales. Retail banking income increased $48.3 million, or 19.9%, over 2000. The growth was attributed to successful integration of our acquisitions together with ongoing franchise development initiatives. Net gains on sales were $114.3 million in 2001, compared to $9.3 million in 2000. The mortgage-backed securities sold during the year consisted primarily of bank-originated, fixed-rate residential mortgage and consumer products, as we generated significantly more residential mortgage and consumer loans than we needed to meet our balance sheet size and mix objectives. We did not utilize any special-purpose entities for the sale of any of our mortgage-backed securities. The increases in retail banking and net gains on sales were partially offset by a $53.0 million, or 68.1%, decrease in mortgage banking income. This decline in mortgage banking income resulted primarily from an increase of $24.6 million to the valuation allowance on loan servicing assets in response to faster prepayment speeds resulting from higher levels of refinancing.
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Administrative expenses were $679.0 million for 2002, an increase of $49.3 million from 2001. The increase in administrative expenses was primarily attributable to costs associated with the operational integration of acquisitions completed in the last year and continued investments in our operations. Additionally, marketing expenses increased by $8.8 million as we implemented various programs geared to support sales efforts throughout the Bank. The increase in administrative expenses in 2002 was partially offset by the $16.2 million decline in amortization of goodwill over 2001, as a result of the Companys adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9. Despite the increase in administrative expenses, our efficiency ratio improved to 39.54% for 2002 from 41.91% in 2001, and our ratio of administrative expenses to average assets improved to 1.73% in 2002 from 1.77% in 2001.
Administrative expenses were $629.7 million for 2001, an increase of $25.7 million from 2000. There were $29.5 million in merger-related expenses recorded in 2000 related to our acquisition of St. Paul Bancorp, Inc. The increase in administrative expenses year over year was primarily attributable to costs associated with the operational integration of acquisitions and $12.2 million in higher marketing costs as we implemented various programs geared to support sales efforts throughout the Bank. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of 2001, Charter One contributed $7.5 million to a newly formed charitable foundation. Despite the increase in administrative expenses, our efficiency ratio improved to 41.91% for 2001 from 45.68% in 2000, and our ratio of administrative expenses to average assets improved to 1.77% in 2001 from 1.90% in 2000.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
The provision for income taxes was $268.7 million, $232.9 million and $203.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. The effective tax rates were 31.8%, 31.7%, and 32.0% for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. For a further analysis of our income taxes, see Note 13 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
At December 31, 2002, total assets were $41.9 billion, an increase of $3.7 billion, or 9.7%, from $38.2 billion at December 31, 2001. Contributing to the increase in total assets was a $3.5 billion increase in our mortgage-backed securities available for sale portfolio, as well as growth in our loans and leases. See Loans and Leases below for further discussion regarding our loan and lease activity.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 23
LOANS AND LEASES
Total loans and leases at December 31, 2002 were $26.2 billion, compared to $25.7 billion at December 31, 2001. The increase of $.5 billion was primarily attributable to the Charter National merger in which we acquired $203.0 million of loans. Additionally, as illustrated in the table below, we originated $21.2 billion of loans and leases during 2002, compared to $17.8 billion of loan and lease originations in 2001. Offsetting the originations in 2002 were $6.7 billion of residential mortgage and consumer loan securitizations, as we generated significantly more residential mortgage and consumer loans than we needed to meet our balance sheet size and mix objectives. These residential mortgage and consumer loans were exchanged for government agency mortgage-backed securities. We did not retain any credit enhancing residual interests, nor are we subject to any significant recourse obligations. At the time of such exchange, we did not recognize a gain or loss in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Rather, the government agency mortgage-backed securities were classified as available for sale on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and carried at estimated fair value with the unrealized holding gain or loss reflected as a component of shareholders equity. Net gains are realized in the Consolidated Statements of Income at the time of sale of these government agency mortgage-backed securities.
LOAN AND LEASE ACTIVITY
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Originations: |
|||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage: |
|||||||||||||||
Permanent: |
|||||||||||||||
One-to-four family |
$ | 10,554,142 | $ | 8,814,430 | $ | 4,916,631 | |||||||||
Multifamily |
157,166 | 42,453 | 34,454 | ||||||||||||
Commercial |
237,710 | 155,604 | 199,648 | ||||||||||||
Total permanent loans |
10,949,018 | 9,012,487 | 5,150,733 | ||||||||||||
Construction: |
|||||||||||||||
One-to-four family |
35,716 | 349,510 | 605,240 | ||||||||||||
Multifamily |
79,346 | 138,861 | 78,542 | ||||||||||||
Commercial |
164,577 | 195,896 | 104,045 | ||||||||||||
Total construction loans |
279,639 | 684,267 | 787,827 | ||||||||||||
Total real estate mortgage
loans originated |
11,228,657 | 9,696,754 | 5,938,560 | ||||||||||||
Retail consumer |
4,091,298 | 3,536,687 | 2,063,352 | ||||||||||||
Automobile |
3,395,273 | 2,715,921 | 1,791,772 | ||||||||||||
Consumer finance |
285,920 | 259,458 | 405,193 | ||||||||||||
Leases |
521,096 | 502,073 | 794,947 | ||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
1,717,328 | 1,138,496 | 818,394 | ||||||||||||
Total loans and
leases originated |
21,239,572 | 17,849,389 | 11,812,218 | ||||||||||||
Acquired through business
combinations and purchases |
218,308 | 1,425,549 | 18,809 | ||||||||||||
Sales and principal reductions: |
|||||||||||||||
Loans sold |
2,394,524 | 1,635,903 | 472,622 | ||||||||||||
Loans exchanged for mortgage-backed securities |
6,667,082 | 6,708,253 | 3,991,087 | ||||||||||||
Principal reductions |
11,817,711 | 9,111,479 | 5,593,663 | ||||||||||||
Total sales and principal
reductions |
20,879,317 | 17,455,635 | 10,057,372 | ||||||||||||
Increase before net items |
$ | 578,563 | $ | 1,819,303 | $ | 1,773,655 | |||||||||
Our lending operations are primarily concentrated in Ohio, Michigan, New York, Illinois, Vermont and Massachusetts. As a result, our financial condition and results of operations will be subject to general economic conditions prevailing in those states. If economic conditions in those states worsen, we may experience higher default rates in our existing portfolio as well as a reduction in the value of collateral securing individual loans. Separately, our ability to originate the volume of loans or achieve the level of deposits currently anticipated could be affected.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning nonperforming and underperforming assets for the periods reported. Underperforming assets consist of (1) nonperforming assets (nonaccrual loans and leases, restructured real estate mortgage loans, and real estate acquired through foreclosure and other collateral owned) and (2) accruing loans and leases delinquent more than 90 days. See Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding our nonperforming and underperforming assets.
24 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
NONPERFORMING AND UNDERPERFORMING ASSETS
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming assets(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans and leases: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
One-to-four family(2) |
$ | 27,904 | $ | 79,394 | $ | 71,269 | $ | 75,682 | $ | 79,768 | ||||||||||||||
Multifamily and commercial |
5,369 | 13,552 | 8,132 | 3,369 | 7,002 | |||||||||||||||||||
Construction and land |
9,885 | 10,276 | 8,806 | 1,095 | 1,178 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate mortgage loans |
43,158 | 103,222 | 88,207 | 80,146 | 87,948 | |||||||||||||||||||
Retail consumer(2) |
13,937 | 16,592 | 11,120 | 16,607 | 14,888 | |||||||||||||||||||
Automobile(3) |
| | 130 | 482 | 454 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer finance(2) |
40,227 | 68,485 | 48,673 | 23,031 | 7,752 | |||||||||||||||||||
Leases |
6,211 | 904 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
39,098 | 10,551 | 18,707 | 6,037 | 9,559 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total nonaccrual loans and leases |
142,631 | 199,754 | 166,837 | 126,303 | 120,601 | |||||||||||||||||||
Less government guaranteed loans(1) |
| 19,630 | 19,225 | 18,841 | 22,429 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total nonaccrual loans net of government
guaranteed loans |
142,631 | 180,124 | 147,612 | 107,462 | 98,172 | |||||||||||||||||||
Restructured real estate mortgage loans |
501 | 653 | 666 | 1,009 | 4,193 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming loans and leases |
143,132 | 180,777 | 148,278 | 108,471 | 102,365 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate and other collateral owned(3) |
40,776 | 50,265 | 27,523 | 24,453 | 19,900 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 183,908 | $ | 231,042 | $ | 175,801 | $ | 132,924 | $ | 122,265 | ||||||||||||||
Ratio of (excluding government guaranteed loans): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming loans and leases to total loans and leases |
.55 | % | .70 | % | .62 | % | .49 | % | .46 | % | ||||||||||||||
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
.44 | .61 | .53 | .42 | .40 | |||||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming assets to total loans, leases and real
estate and other collateral owned |
.70 | .90 | .73 | .60 | .55 | |||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming loans and leases |
229.17 | 141.32 | 127.88 | 171.84 | 180.72 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans and leases before allowance |
1.24 | .98 | .78 | .83 | .83 | |||||||||||||||||||
Accruing loans and leases delinquent more than 90 days(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
One-to-four family(2) |
$ | 25,643 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 5,690 | ||||||||||||||
Multifamily and commercial |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Construction and land |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate mortgage loans |
25,643 | | | | 5,690 | |||||||||||||||||||
Retail consumer(2) |
4,758 | 4,519 | 2,586 | 2,562 | 3,878 | |||||||||||||||||||
Automobile(3) |
3,621 | 6,000 | 6,911 | 4,973 | 5,873 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer finance(2) |
26,739 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Leases |
19 | | 2,956 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
1,536 | 4,691 | 2,086 | 2,463 | 904 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total accruing loans and leases delinquent more
than 90 days |
62,316 | 15,210 | 14,539 | 9,998 | 16,345 | |||||||||||||||||||
Less government guaranteed loans(1) |
| 1,876 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total accruing loans and leases delinquent more
than 90 days net of government guaranteed loans |
$ | 62,316 | $ | 13,334 | $ | 14,539 | $ | 9,998 | $ | 16,345 | ||||||||||||||
Total underperforming assets |
$ | 246,224 | $ | 244,376 | $ | 190,340 | $ | 142,922 | $ | 138,610 | ||||||||||||||
Ratio of (excluding government guaranteed loans): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underperforming assets to total assets |
.59 | % | .64 | % | .58 | % | .45 | % | .45 | % | ||||||||||||||
Underperforming assets to total loans, leases and
real estate and other collateral owned |
.94 | .95 | .79 | .64 | .62 |
(1) | Effective June 30, 2002, amounts exclude loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or Veterans Administration. Prior periods have not been restated. | |
(2) | Effective June 30, 2002, Charter One adopted a new accrual policy in which consumer loans secured by residential real estate are placed on nonaccrual at six payments past due as long as the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. This new policy was implemented prospectively and as such, prior periods have not been restated. The change in the accrual policy did not have a material impact on interest income. Management believes the changes to this policy conform Charter Ones accrual methodology to that of its commercial banking peers. | |
(3) | Effective for the period ended June 30, 2002, Charter One adopted a new loan charge-off policy in which automobile loans are charged off based upon repossession and in certain cases, at the point of bankruptcy discharge. Any automobile loans reaching 120 days delinquent are charged off completely. Previously, Charter Ones policy was to record charge-offs of loans secured by automobiles at the point of repossessed collateral disposition. This new policy was implemented prospectively and as such, prior periods have not been restated. Management believes the changes to this policy conforms Charter Ones charge-off methodology to that of its commercial banking peers. |
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 25
Loans and leases not reflected in the table above, but where known information about possible credit problems of borrowers causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of the borrower to comply with present repayment terms and that may result in disclosure of such loans and leases as underperforming assets in the future are commonly referred to as potential problem loans. During the second quarter of 2002, we changed how we determine potential problem loans to be consistent with commercial banking practice. Previously that determination included all loans and leases classified as substandard not already included as underperforming, without a loan-by-loan evaluation, even though historically only a very small percentage of those loans and leases was ultimately reflected in future charge-offs. Under the newly adopted method, the amount included in potential problem loans results from an evaluation, on a loan-by-loan basis, of loans classified as substandard. The amount of potential problem loans was $14.8 million at December 31, 2002. The vast majority of these loans and leases, as well as our underperforming assets, are collateralized.
Although loans may be classified as nonaccruing, many continue to pay interest on an irregular basis or at levels less than the contractual amounts due. Income recorded on nonaccruing and restructured loans amounted to $4.3 million and the potential income based upon full contractual yields was $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The Company maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses adequate to absorb estimated probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance for loan and lease losses consists of specific reserves for individual credits and general reserves for types or portfolios of loans based on historical loan loss experience, adjusted for concentrations and the current economic environment. All outstanding loans and leases are considered in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. Increases to the allowance for loan and lease losses are made by charges to the provision for loan and lease losses. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to the allowance for loan and leases losses.
The following table details certain information relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses for the five years ended December 31, 2002.
ANALYSIS OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 255,478 | $ | 189,616 | $ | 186,400 | $ | 184,989 | $ | 181,554 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan and
lease losses |
192,003 | 100,766 | 54,205 | 35,237 | 31,325 | |||||||||||||||||
Acquired through business
combination |
3,184 | 33,782 | | 3,603 | | |||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
(7,154 | ) | (4,335 | ) | (6,064 | ) | (8,040 | ) | (7,052 | ) | ||||||||||||
Retail consumer |
(13,100 | ) | (7,613 | ) | (12,508 | ) | (3,952 | ) | (3,823 | ) | ||||||||||||
Automobile |
(78,965 | ) | (40,097 | ) | (27,827 | ) | (28,012 | ) | (25,670 | ) | ||||||||||||
Consumer finance |
(26,395 | ) | (11,246 | ) | (4,994 | ) | (1,340 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||||||||||
Leases |
(2,868 | ) | (7,496 | ) | | (900 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
(16,612 | ) | (7,672 | ) | (8,938 | ) | (3,240 | ) | (1,440 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total charge-offs(1) |
(145,094 | ) | (78,459 | ) | (60,331 | ) | (45,484 | ) | (38,056 | ) | ||||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
1,616 | 207 | 1,396 | 868 | 3,767 | |||||||||||||||||
Retail consumer |
1,834 | 1,972 | 1,610 | 789 | 1,051 | |||||||||||||||||
Automobile |
12,687 | 6,603 | 5,810 | 6,172 | 4,953 | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer finance |
524 | 227 | 17 | 19 | | |||||||||||||||||
Leases |
2,327 | 220 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
3,458 | 544 | 509 | 207 | 395 | |||||||||||||||||
Total recoveries |
22,446 | 9,773 | 9,342 | 8,055 | 10,166 | |||||||||||||||||
Net loan and lease
charge-offs(1) |
(122,648 | ) | (68,686 | ) | (50,989 | ) | (37,429 | ) | (27,890 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 328,017 | $ | 255,478 | $ | 189,616 | $ | 186,400 | $ | 184,989 | ||||||||||||
Net
charge-offs to average loans and leases(1) |
.48 | % | .27 | % | .21 | % | .17 | % | .13 | % |
(1) | Includes $27.3 million in charge-offs recorded in the second quarter of 2002 in conjunction with Charter Ones adoption of the new consumer loan charge-off policy discussed above. This new policy was implemented prospectively and as such, prior periods have not been restated. Excluding the impact of the change in charge-off policy, net charge-offs as a percent of average loans and leases were .37% in 2002. |
26 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, management reviews and evaluates on a quarterly basis the potential credit risk in the loan and lease portfolio. This evaluation process is documented by senior management and approved by the Companys Board of Directors. Management evaluates homogeneous consumer-oriented loans, such as 1-4 family mortgage loans and retail consumer loans, based upon all or a combination of delinquencies, credit scores, loss migration analysis and charge-off experience. Management supplements this analysis by reviewing the geographical lending areas involved and their local economic and political trends, the nature and volume of the portfolio, regulatory examination findings, specific grading systems applied and any other known factors which may impact future credit losses. Nonhomogeneous loans, generally defined as commercial real estate loans, corporate banking loans and leases, are underwritten, approved and risk rated individually at inception. On a monthly basis, management re-evaluates the risk ratings on these nonhomogeneous loans if loan relationships exceed certain dollar thresholds established for the respective portfolios. The Companys risk rating methodology uses nine grade levels to stratify each portfolio. Many factors are considered when these grades are assigned to individual loans and leases such as current and past delinquency, financial statements of the borrower, current net realizable value of collateral, the general economic environment and the specific economic trends affecting the individual loan or lease. During this evaluation process, individual loans are identified and evaluated for impairment as prescribed under SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. Impairment losses are recognized when, based upon current information, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured either by a loans observable market value, fair value of the collateral or the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate. These impairment losses, combined with other probable losses as determined in the loan and lease portfolio evaluation process, are charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. This data is then presented to the Companys Reserve Adequacy Committee, comprised of senior members of management and independent directors. The Reserve Adequacy Committee determines the level of allowance for loan and lease losses necessary to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at an amount considered adequate to absorb probable loan and lease losses inherent in the portfolio. Although management believes that it uses the best information available to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. See Notes 1 and 6 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information concerning the Companys allowance for loan and lease losses.
The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses to the respective loan and lease classifications, in dollar and percentage terms. The allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses is based on a consideration of all of the factors discussed above that are used to determine the allowance for loans and leases as a whole. Since all of those factors are subject to change, the allocation of the allowance for loan and leases losses shown below is not necessarily indicative of future losses or future allocations. Management believes that the allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31, 2002 was adequate to absorb losses occurring in any category of loans and leases.
ALLOCATION OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
$ | 90,510 | $ | 73,311 | $ | 103,989 | $ | 107,576 | $ | 110,635 | |||||||||||
Retail consumer |
68,346 | 30,366 | 15,191 | 17,323 | 16,869 | ||||||||||||||||
Automobile |
64,776 | 65,606 | 42,206 | 38,301 | 39,585 | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer finance |
18,561 | 33,433 | 7,855 | 5,356 | 1,654 | ||||||||||||||||
Leases |
22,787 | 21,587 | 5,237 | 4,037 | 3,737 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
63,037 | 31,175 | 15,138 | 13,807 | 12,509 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 328,017 | $ | 255,478 | $ | 189,616 | $ | 186,400 | $ | 184,989 | |||||||||||
Percent of net loans and leases to total net loans and leases: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
41.6 | % | 48.9 | % | 53.1 | % | 60.8 | % | 70.1 | % | |||||||||||
Retail consumer |
20.7 | 18.8 | 19.2 | 16.9 | 12.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Automobile |
21.1 | 16.8 | 12.9 | 11.0 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Consumer finance |
3.7 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Leases |
8.1 | 7.7 | 7.4 | 5.1 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking |
4.8 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 27
INVESTMENTS AND MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
The securities portfolio is comprised primarily of mortgage-backed securities, including government agency and AAA and AA rated private issues. We held no investments or mortgage-backed securities of any single non-governmental issuer which were in excess of 10% of shareholders equity at December 31, 2002. See Notes 4 and 5 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding our investments and mortgage-backed securities.
DEPOSITS, BORROWINGS AND OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDS
Deposits are generally the most important source of our funds for use in lending and for general business purposes. Deposit inflows and outflows are significantly influenced by general interest rates and competitive factors. Consumer and commercial deposits are attracted principally within our primary market areas. Deposits totaled $27.5 billion and $25.1 billion at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. This represented an increase of 9.6% year over year. Core deposits (checking accounts and money market and savings accounts) increased $3.2 billion, or 22.2%, since December 31, 2001. See Note 8 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion regarding our deposits.
In addition to deposits, we obtain funds from different borrowing sources. The primary source of these borrowings is the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system. Those borrowings totaled $9.0 billion and $8.7 billion at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The FHLB functions as a central bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati, the Bank is required to own capital stock in the FHLB. It is authorized to apply for advances on the security of this stock, certain home mortgages and other assets, provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made pursuant to several different credit programs, each of which has its own interest rate and range of maturities. See Note 9 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information as to the composition, maturities and cost associated with these advances at December 31, 2002.
In addition to FHLB advances, we use federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements and other borrowings to fund operations. Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements totaled $283.9 million and $203.3 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Other borrowings totaled $708.9 million and $304.4 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. See Notes 10 and 11 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information concerning these borrowings.
The following table summarizes short-term borrowings, based upon original issue date, at the end of and during the periods indicated. For purposes of the table below, our short-term borrowings consisted of FHLB advances. Interest rates shown do not include the annualized effect of interest rate risk management instruments.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||
Short-term borrowings
outstanding at end of period |
$ | 2,595,000 | $ | 1,114,873 | $ | 3,410,248 | ||||||
Weighted average rate at end
of period |
1.34 | % | 3.03 | % | 6.09 | % | ||||||
Maximum month-end balance of
short-term borrowings during
the period |
$ | 3,900,000 | $ | 3,530,248 | $ | 5,905,248 | ||||||
Approximate average short-term
borrowings outstanding
during the period |
985,497 | 2,291,246 | 4,775,470 | |||||||||
Approximate weighted average
rate during the period |
2.96 | % | 4.84 | % | 5.98 | % |
We use our portfolio of investment securities, mortgage-backed securities and loans as collateral for our borrowings, public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law. We do not hold any interests in or sponsor any special-purpose entities.
LIQUIDITY
Our principal sources of funds are deposits, advances from the FHLB of Cincinnati, federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements, repayments and maturities of loans and securities, proceeds from the sale of loans and securities and funds provided by operations. While scheduled loan, security and interest-bearing deposit amortization and maturity are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan and mortgage-backed securities repayments are greatly influenced by economic conditions, the general level of interest rates and competition. We utilize particular sources of funds based on comparative costs and availability. We generally manage the pricing of deposits to maintain a steady deposit balance, but from time to time may decide to supplement deposits with longer term and/or lower cost alternative sources of funds such as FHLB advances and federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements. We may, from time to time, decide to price deposits aggressively for strategic reasons which may result in significant deposit inflows.
28 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into off-balance-sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, standby letters of credit and commitments to purchase or sell assets. These financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they are funded or the related fees are incurred or received. We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds available to meet our commitments. See Notes 1, 6 and 17 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information concerning our commitments.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We realize income principally from the difference or spread between the interest earned on loans, investments and other interest-earning assets and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Loan volume and yield, as well as the volume of and rates on investments, deposits and borrowings, are affected by market interest rates. Additionally, because of the terms and conditions of many of our loan documents and deposit accounts, a change in interest rates could also affect the projected maturities of the loan portfolio and/or the deposit base which could alter our sensitivity to future changes in interest rates. Accordingly, we consider interest rate risk to be our most significant market risk.
Interest rate risk management focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income within Board-approved policy limits while taking into consideration, among other factors, our overall credit, operating income, operating cost, and capital profile. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee, which includes senior management representatives and reports to the Board of Directors of the Bank, together with the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank, monitors and manages interest rate risk to maintain an acceptable level of potential change to net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates.
We use an internal earnings simulation model as our primary method to identify and manage our interest rate risk profile. The model is based on actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for all financial instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the impact of changing interest rates on future volumes and the prepayment rate of applicable financial instruments. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.
Using this internal simulation model, net interest income projections as of December 31, 2002 are referenced below. Our base case shows our present estimated net interest income sensitivity profile and assumes no changes in the operating environment or operating strategies, but assumes interest rates increase or decrease gradually, in parallel fashion, over the next year and then remain unchanged. The table indicates the estimated impact on net interest income under the various interest rate scenarios as a percentage of base case net interest income projections.
Changes in | Estimated Percentage Change | ||||
Interest Rates | in Future Net Interest Income | ||||
(basis points) | 12 Months | ||||
+200 over one year |
(4.89 | )% | |||
+100 over one year |
(1.99 | ) | |||
- 100 over one year |
3.49 |
A secondary method used to identify and manage our interest rate risk profile is the static gap analysis. Interest sensitivity gap analysis measures the difference between the assets and liabilities repricing or maturing within specific time periods. An asset-sensitive position indicates that there are more rate-sensitive assets than rate-sensitive liabilities repricing or maturing within specific time periods, which would generally imply a favorable impact on net interest income in periods of rising interest rates and a negative impact in periods of falling rates. A liability-sensitive position would generally imply a negative impact on net interest income in periods of rising rates and a positive impact in periods of falling rates.
Gap analysis has limitations because it cannot measure precisely the effect of interest rate movements and competitive pressures on the repricing and maturity characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, a significant portion of our adjustable-rate assets have limits on their maximum yield, whereas most of our interest-bearing liabilities are not subject to these limitations. As a result, certain assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within a stated period may in fact reprice at different times and at different volumes, and certain adjustable-rate assets may reach their yield limits and not reprice.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 29
The following table presents an analysis of our interest-sensitivity gap position at December 31, 2002. All interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are shown based on the earlier of their contractual maturity or repricing date adjusted by forecasted prepayment and decay rates. Asset prepayment and liability decay rates are selected after considering the current rate environment, industry prepayment and decay rates, our historical experience, and the repricing and prepayment characteristics of portfolios acquired through merger.
MATURITY/RATE SENSITIVITY
December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0-6 | 7-12 | 1-3 | 3-5 | 5-10 | Over 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Months | Months | Years | Years | Years | Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and mortgage-backed
securities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustable rate |
$ | 4,090,926 | $ | 753,077 | $ | 823,037 | $ | 488,763 | $ | 56,802 | $ | | $ | 6,212,605 | |||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
3,426,615 | 1,964,596 | 5,462,727 | 2,739,817 | 2,339,450 | 704,574 | 16,637,779 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail consumer loans |
3,021,343 | 257,511 | 1,262,811 | 578,892 | 352,375 | 21,521 | 5,494,453 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automobile loans |
1,206,548 | 1,053,555 | 3,012,235 | 316,136 | 17,855 | | 5,606,329 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer finance loans |
175,864 | 113,725 | 312,685 | 169,364 | 157,848 | 55,286 | 984,772 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leases |
139,168 | 121,883 | 418,631 | 303,481 | 318,507 | 831,798 | 2,133,468 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking loans |
624,132 | 74,186 | 308,442 | 236,652 | 64,522 | 10,069 | 1,318,003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities, federal
funds sold, interest-bearing
deposits and other
interest-earning assets |
771,375 | 1,987 | 17,438 | 29,240 | 48,039 | 35,568 | 903,647 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
13,455,971 | 4,340,520 | 11,618,006 | 4,862,345 | 3,355,398 | 1,658,816 | $ | 39,291,056 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Checking, money market and savings
accounts and escrow accounts |
270,177 | 7,484,328 | 8,647,379 | 1,409,657 | | | $ | 17,811,541 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
4,062,326 | 2,557,283 | 2,911,913 | 131,466 | 34,226 | 22,662 | 9,719,876 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
3,003,829 | 7,999 | 2,400,690 | 2,509,858 | 1,110,483 | 5,066 | 9,037,925 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and
repurchase agreements |
283,912 | | | | | | 283,912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
9,413 | 17,190 | 253,234 | 12,773 | 409,424 | 6,819 | 708,853 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
7,629,657 | 10,066,800 | 14,213,216 | 4,063,754 | 1,554,133 | 34,547 | $ | 37,562,107 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Excess (deficiency) of
interest-earning assets over
interest-bearing liabilities |
5,826,314 | (5,726,280 | ) | (2,595,210 | ) | 798,591 | 1,801,265 | 1,624,269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of hedging |
(80,395 | ) | (409,605 | ) | 90,000 | | 400,000 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted interest-sensitivity gap |
$ | 5,745,919 | $ | (6,135,885 | ) | $ | (2,505,210 | ) | $ | 798,591 | $ | 2,201,265 | $ | 1,624,269 | |||||||||||||||||
Cumulative excess (deficiency) of
interest-earning assets over
interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 5,745,919 | $ | (389,966 | ) | $ | (2,895,176 | ) | $ | (2,096,585 | ) | $ | 104,680 | $ | 1,728,949 | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative interest-sensitivity gap
as a percentage of total assets at
December 31, 2002 |
13.71 | % | (.93 | )% | (6.91 | )% | (5.00 | )% | .25 | % | 4.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
30 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
CAPITAL AND DIVIDENDS
Charter One and Charter One Bank are each subject to certain regulatory capital requirements. We believe that as of December 31, 2002, Charter One and Charter One Bank each individually exceeded all capital requirements to which they were subject. See Note 14 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for an analysis of our regulatory capital.
On September 12, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with a third party that provided the Company with an option to purchase up to $100 million of Charter One common stock through the use of forward transactions. These transactions could have been settled at Charter Ones election on a physical, net cash or net share basis. On January 8, 2002, the Company settled open forward transactions for 3.5 million shares of its common stock through physical share settlement whereby the Company paid cash of $97.0 million, or $27.69 per share, to a third party in exchange for the 3.5 million shares. Common shares outstanding and shareholders equity were reduced accordingly on the January 8, 2002 settlement date. Shares and per share data discussed in this paragraph have not been restated to reflect the 5% stock dividend issued September 30, 2002.
On April 23, 2002, the Companys Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase up to 10% of the Companys outstanding common stock under a new program of open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. This program replaced the repurchase program that had been in effect since July 18, 2000 and under which the Company repurchased approximately 15.0 million shares for a total cost of $394.8 million. As of February 21, 2003, we had repurchased 8.1 million shares under the new authorization at an average cost of $30.91 per share. Shares and per share data discussed in this paragraph have not been restated to reflect the 5% stock dividend issued September 30, 2002.
We continually review the amount of our cash dividend and our policy of paying quarterly dividends. This payment will depend upon a number of factors, including capital requirements, regulatory limitations, our financial condition, results of operations and Charter One Banks ability to upstream funds. Charter One depends significantly upon dividends originating from Charter One Bank to accumulate earnings for payment of cash dividends to our shareholders. See Note 14 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of restrictions on Charter One Banks ability to pay cash dividends.
Quarterly high and low sales prices, closing prices and cash dividends declared for our common stock are shown in the following table. All prices have been restated to reflect prior stock dividends. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CF. As of February 21, 2003, there were approximately 19,000 shareholders of record.
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDENDS
First | Second | Third | Fourth | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Year | |||||||||||||||||
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
High |
$ | 30.95 | $ | 34.77 | $ | 33.42 | $ | 31.48 | $ | 34.77 | |||||||||||
Low |
25.19 | 29.30 | 25.81 | 23.89 | 23.89 | ||||||||||||||||
Close |
29.73 | 32.74 | 29.72 | 28.73 | 28.73 | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
and paid |
.19 | .21 | .21 | .22 | .83 | ||||||||||||||||
2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
High |
$ | 27.20 | $ | 28.93 | $ | 29.91 | $ | 28.06 | $ | 29.91 | |||||||||||
Low |
23.04 | 24.03 | 22.29 | 23.43 | 22.29 | ||||||||||||||||
Close |
25.67 | 28.93 | 26.88 | 25.86 | 25.86 | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared
and paid |
.16 | .18 | .18 | .19 | .71 |
On January 21, 2003, Charter One declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $.22 per share. The cash dividend was paid on February 20, 2003 to shareholders of record on February 6, 2003.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 31
QUARTERLY RESULTS
The following table presents summarized quarterly data for each of the years indicated. Earnings per share have been restated to reflect prior stock dividends.
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
First | Second | Third | Fourth | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Year | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest
income |
$ | 564,711 | $ | 581,254 | $ | 568,760 | $ | 571,736 | $ | 2,286,461 | |||||||||||
Net interest
income |
283,097 | 297,867 | 290,267 | 298,599 | 1,169,830 | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan
and lease losses |
28,717 | 55,277 | 47,695 | 60,314 | 192,003 | ||||||||||||||||
Net gains |
21,727 | 37,840 | 83,881 | 61,585 | 205,033 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
142,485 | 145,895 | 143,562 | 145,726 | 577,668 | ||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per
share |
.61 | .63 | .63 | .65 | 2.52 | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings
per share |
.60 | .61 | .61 | .63 | 2.45 | ||||||||||||||||
2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest
income |
$ | 589,276 | $ | 579,942 | $ | 608,982 | $ | 600,046 | $ | 2,378,246 | |||||||||||
Net interest
income |
229,481 | 227,671 | 253,324 | 279,940 | 990,416 | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan
and lease losses |
17,728 | 17,076 | 27,109 | 38,853 | 100,766 | ||||||||||||||||
Net gains |
16,094 | 25,580 | 26,302 | 46,336 | 114,312 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
114,790 | 120,412 | 130,433 | 135,079 | 500,714 | ||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per
share |
.50 | .53 | .55 | .57 | 2.15 | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings
per share |
.49 | .51 | .54 | .56 | 2.10 |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Charter Ones Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates. Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the Consolidated Financial Statements could reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates, assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not carried on the Consolidated Financial Statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other third-party sources, when available. When third-party information is not available, valuation adjustments are estimated in good faith by management including the use of internal cash flow modeling techniques.
The most significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and in this Financial Review, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the Consolidated Financial Statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses, the valuation of loan servicing assets, and the valuation of lease residuals to be the accounting areas that require the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.
The allowance for loan and lease losses represents managements estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and assumptions and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired nonhomogeneous loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based upon all or a combination of delinquencies, credit scores, loss migration analysis, and historical charge-off experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan and lease portfolio also represents the largest asset category on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. See Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Analysis of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses in this Financial Review for further discussion regarding the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan and lease losses and a discussion of the factors evaluated by management to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses.
Loan servicing assets are established and accounted for based on discounted cash flow modeling techniques which require management to make estimates regarding the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, including assumptions about loan repayment rates, credit loss experience, and costs to service, as well
32 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
as discount rates that consider the risk involved. Because the values of these assets are sensitive to changes in assumptions, the valuation of loan servicing assets is considered a critical accounting estimate. Notes 1 and 7 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements include further discussion on the accounting for loan servicing assets.
Lease financing receivables include a residual value component, which represents the estimated value of the leased asset upon the expiration of the lease. The Company leases various types of equipment under commercial lease financing arrangements. The valuation of residual assets is considered critical due to the forecasted residual values by secondary market research companies, independent appraisals of residual values, the probability of the lessee purchasing or re-leasing the equipment at the end of the lease term, the Companys past experience with realizing residual values of similar equipment, the pace and effects of technological changes, the financial condition of the lessee, the estimated useful life of the equipment, the contractually required condition of the equipment upon lease termination, and the availability of a secondary market for the used equipment. Notes 1 and 6 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements provide further discussion of the Companys lease financing arrangements.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
DISCUSSION OF FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document, including information incorporated by reference, contains, and future filings by Charter One on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K and future oral and written statements and press releases by Charter One and its management may contain, forward-looking statements about Charter One which we believe are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements with respect to anticipated future operating and financial performance, including revenue creation, lending origination, operating efficiencies, loan sales, charge-offs and loan loss provisions, deposits and refinancing of liabilities, growth opportunities, interest rates, acquisition and divestiture opportunities, and synergies, efficiencies, cost savings and funding advantages expected to be realized from prior acquisitions. These forward-looking statements are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data and managements views and assumptions regarding future events. These forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and investors must recognize that actual results may differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, Charter One cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
Many of these forward-looking statements appear throughout this document. Words such as may, could, should, would, believe, anticipate, estimate, expect, intend, plan and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. The important factors discussed below, as well as other factors discussed elsewhere in this document and factors identified in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and those presented elsewhere by our management from time to time, could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements made in this document. Among the factors that could cause our actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements are:
| the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct our operations; general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, may be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in the credit quality of our loans and leases and other assets; | ||
| the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board; | ||
| financial markets, monetary and interest rate fluctuations, particularly the relative relationship of short-term interest rates to long-term interest rates; | ||
| the timely development of and acceptance of new products and services of Charter One and the perceived overall value of these products and services by users, including the features, pricing and quality compared to competitors products and services; | ||
| the impact of changes in financial services laws and regulations (including laws and regulations concerning taxes, accounting standards, banking, securities and insurance); legislative or regulatory changes may adversely affect the business in which we are engaged; | ||
| the impact of technological changes; | ||
| our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions into our existing operations, and the availability of new acquisitions, joint ventures and alliance opportunities that build shareholder value; | ||
| changes in consumer spending and saving habits; and | ||
| our success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. |
Charter One disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements based on the occurrence of future events, the receipt of new information, or otherwise.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 33
consolidated STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||
Cash accounts |
$ | 436,970 | $ | 472,658 | ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with banks |
9,731 | 8,355 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold and other |
512 | 35,507 | ||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
447,213 | 516,520 | ||||||||
Investment securities: |
||||||||||
Available for sale |
210,095 | 129,312 | ||||||||
Held to maturity (fair value of $4,276 and $6,467) |
3,973 | 6,274 | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||
Available for sale |
11,536,608 | 8,030,512 | ||||||||
Held to maturity (fair value of $565,072 and $1,022,658) |
540,781 | 983,904 | ||||||||
Loans and leases, net |
25,852,846 | 25,396,071 | ||||||||
Loans held for sale |
351,892 | 332,629 | ||||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
829,043 | 808,231 | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock |
681,923 | 617,836 | ||||||||
Premises and equipment |
353,730 | 352,235 | ||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
154,962 | 162,065 | ||||||||
Real estate and other collateral owned |
42,980 | 54,351 | ||||||||
Loan servicing assets |
128,564 | 139,840 | ||||||||
Goodwill |
386,372 | 350,839 | ||||||||
Other assets |
375,090 | 293,897 | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 41,896,072 | $ | 38,174,516 | ||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 27,527,843 | $ | 25,123,309 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
9,037,925 | 8,657,238 | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements |
283,912 | 203,259 | ||||||||
Other borrowings |
708,853 | 304,410 | ||||||||
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
23,595 | 54,103 | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
38,372 | 57,704 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
1,191,747 | 845,993 | ||||||||
Total liabilities |
38,812,247 | 35,246,016 | ||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
| | ||||||||
Shareholders Equity |
||||||||||
Preferred stock $.01 par value per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized
and unissued |
| | ||||||||
Common stock $.01 par value per share; 360,000,000 shares authorized;
227,571,468 and 224,855,827 shares issued |
2,276 | 2,249 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
2,193,095 | 2,091,767 | ||||||||
Retained earnings |
824,564 | 811,093 | ||||||||
Less 2,781,151 and 516,082 shares of common stock held in treasury at cost |
(82,610 | ) | (14,586 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
146,500 | 37,977 | ||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
3,083,825 | 2,928,500 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 41,896,072 | $ | 38,174,516 | ||||||
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
34 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
consolidated STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Interest income: |
|||||||||||||||
Loans and leases |
$ | 1,671,843 | $ | 1,872,270 | $ | 1,810,608 | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|||||||||||||||
Available for sale |
519,821 | 366,475 | 241,369 | ||||||||||||
Held to maturity |
47,747 | 86,952 | 120,812 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities: |
|||||||||||||||
Trading |
| | 38 | ||||||||||||
Available for sale |
11,495 | 11,180 | 33,412 | ||||||||||||
Held to maturity |
252 | 409 | 1,594 | ||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets |
35,303 | 40,960 | 39,255 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
2,286,461 | 2,378,246 | 2,247,088 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
|||||||||||||||
Deposits |
654,816 | 855,283 | 766,109 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
416,864 | 498,444 | 532,583 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
44,951 | 34,103 | 45,361 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
1,116,631 | 1,387,830 | 1,344,053 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
1,169,830 | 990,416 | 903,035 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
192,003 | 100,766 | 54,205 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses |
977,827 | 889,650 | 848,830 | ||||||||||||
Other income: |
|||||||||||||||
Retail banking |
330,735 | 291,892 | 243,547 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage banking |
(18,495 | ) | 24,878 | 77,914 | |||||||||||
Leasing operations |
(3,575 | ) | 4,020 | 14,919 | |||||||||||
Net gains |
205,033 | 114,312 | 9,271 | ||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance and other |
33,848 | 38,522 | 47,220 | ||||||||||||
Total other income |
547,546 | 473,624 | 392,871 | ||||||||||||
Administrative expenses: |
|||||||||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
321,167 | 279,900 | 270,642 | ||||||||||||
Net occupancy and equipment |
116,845 | 109,388 | 101,893 | ||||||||||||
Marketing expenses |
40,472 | 31,708 | 19,527 | ||||||||||||
Federal deposit insurance premiums |
4,563 | 3,918 | 4,011 | ||||||||||||
Merger expenses |
| | 29,491 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of goodwill |
| 16,156 | 16,180 | ||||||||||||
Other administrative expenses |
195,925 | 188,592 | 162,211 | ||||||||||||
Total administrative expenses |
678,972 | 629,662 | 603,955 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
846,401 | 733,612 | 637,746 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
268,733 | 232,898 | 203,784 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 500,714 | $ | 433,962 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per share (1) |
$ | 2.52 | $ | 2.15 | $ | 1.84 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share (1) |
$ | 2.45 | $ | 2.10 | $ | 1.81 | |||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (1) |
229,302,385 | 232,547,418 | 235,617,650 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding (1) |
236,115,843 | 238,383,474 | 239,894,826 |
(1) | Restated to reflect the 5% stock dividend issued September 30, 2002. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 35
consolidated STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | and Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per | Common | Paid-In | Retained | Treasury | Comprehensive | Ownership | |||||||||||||||||||||||
share data) | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Stock | Income (Loss) | Plan | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2000 |
$ | 2,124 | $ | 1,736,726 | $ | 734,510 | $ | (65,502 | ) | $ | (7,020 | ) | $ | (3,138 | ) | $ | 2,397,700 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 433,962 | | | | 433,962 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in net unrealized gain
(loss) on securities, net of tax
and reclassification adjustment |
| | | | 30,873 | | 30,873 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | 433,962 | | 30,873 | | 464,835 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5% stock dividend |
| | (220,721 | ) | 220,505 | | | (216 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of 12,940,172 shares of
treasury stock |
| | | (293,763 | ) | | | (293,763 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
EISOP loan repayment |
| | | | | 1,882 | 1,882 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid ($.60 per share) (1) |
| | (144,443 | ) | | | | (144,443 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares in
connection with stock options
plans, 2,028,110 shares |
3 | 8,506 | (16,515 | ) | 38,215 | | | 30,209 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2000 |
2,127 | 1,745,232 | 786,793 | (100,545 | ) | 23,853 | (1,256 | ) | 2,456,204 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 500,714 | | | | 500,714 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in net unrealized gain
(loss) on securities, net of
tax and reclassification
adjustment |
| | | | 14,124 | | 14,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | 500,714 | | 14,124 | | 514,838 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5% stock dividend |
49 | 130,002 | (279,968 | ) | 149,461 | | | (456 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of 4,322,010 shares of
treasury stock |
| | | (122,597 | ) | | | (122,597 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
EISOP loan repayment |
| | | | | 1,256 | 1,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid ($.71 per share) (1) |
| | (166,596 | ) | | | | (166,596 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, 6,887,246 shares |
69 | 196,339 | | | | | 196,408 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option plans, 2,874,746 shares |
4 | 20,194 | (29,850 | ) | 59,095 | | | 49,443 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2001 |
2,249 | 2,091,767 | 811,093 | (14,586 | ) | 37,977 | | 2,928,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 577,668 | | | | 577,668 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in net unrealized gain
(loss) on securities, net
of tax and reclassification
adjustment |
| | | | 108,523 | | 108,523 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
| | 577,668 | | 108,523 | | 686,191 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
5% stock dividend |
26 | 84,259 | (329,627 | ) | 244,523 | | | (819 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of 13,347,900 shares of
treasury stock |
| | | (398,365 | ) | | | (398,365 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid ($.83 per share) (1) |
| | (190,251 | ) | | | | (190,251 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common shares in
connection with stock option
plans, 2,986,808 shares |
1 | 17,069 | (44,319 | ) | 85,818 | | | 58,569 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
$ | 2,276 | $ | 2,193,095 | $ | 824,564 | $ | (82,610 | ) | $ | 146,500 | $ | | $ | 3,083,825 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Restated to reflect the 5% stock dividend issued September 30, 2002. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
36 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
consolidated STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 500,714 | $ | 433,962 | |||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
192,003 | 100,766 | 54,205 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
156,923 | 186,502 | 170,321 | ||||||||||||||
Net gains |
(205,033 | ) | (113,270 | ) | (7,167 | ) | |||||||||||
Accretion of discounts, amortization of premiums, amortization of goodwill,
intangibles and depreciation, net |
188,192 | 129,008 | 95,360 | ||||||||||||||
Origination of loans held for sale |
(2,394,524 | ) | (1,635,903 | ) | (472,622 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale |
2,388,522 | 1,634,460 | 470,584 | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from investment securities held for trading |
| | 13,418 | ||||||||||||||
Other |
43,146 | 138,273 | (195,470 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
946,897 | 940,550 | 562,591 | ||||||||||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|||||||||||||||||
Net principal disbursed on loans and leases |
(7,131,131 | ) | (7,156,533 | ) | (5,742,717 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from principal repayments and maturities of: |
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity |
447,594 | 524,010 | 400,738 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
2,114,601 | 1,172,379 | 277,562 | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities held to maturity |
2,719 | 16,960 | 9,298 | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
29,326 | 360,104 | 59,129 | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of: |
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
12,363,341 | 3,998,182 | 4,020,135 | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
1,755 | 9,656 | 25,535 | ||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock |
10,305 | 20,547 | 20,300 | ||||||||||||||
Loan servicing assets |
| | 36,576 | ||||||||||||||
Purchases of: |
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities available for sale |
(10,906,956 | ) | (2,065,543 | ) | (149,429 | ) | |||||||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
(77,232 | ) | (4,398 | ) | (10,696 | ) | |||||||||||
Loans |
(17,043 | ) | (58,723 | ) | (18,809 | ) | |||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock |
(42,657 | ) | | (80,838 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loan servicing assets, including those originated |
(100,430 | ) | (61,897 | ) | (42,857 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash and cash equivalents (paid) received in connection with business combinations |
(90,425 | ) | 866,742 | | |||||||||||||
Other |
(80,540 | ) | 63,640 | (76,125 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,476,773 | ) | (2,314,874 | ) | (1,272,198 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
1,580,780 | (1,334,067 | ) | (1,936,001 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
429,334 | 1,137,184 | 4,093,770 | ||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term borrowings |
(1,154,101 | ) | (1,329,166 | ) | (1,713,980 | ) | |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in, net of business combinations: |
|||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
2,165,930 | 3,142,587 | 531,304 | ||||||||||||||
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance |
(30,508 | ) | (16,745 | ) | (19,548 | ) | |||||||||||
Payment of dividends on common stock |
(191,070 | ) | (167,052 | ) | (144,659 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
58,569 | 49,443 | 30,209 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(398,365 | ) | (122,597 | ) | (293,763 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
2,460,569 | 1,359,587 | 547,332 | ||||||||||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(69,307 | ) | (14,737 | ) | (162,275 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
516,520 | 531,257 | 693,532 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 447,213 | $ | 516,520 | $ | 531,257 | |||||||||||
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information |
|||||||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: |
|||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits and borrowings |
$ | 1,124,274 | $ | 1,380,560 | $ | 1,385,269 | |||||||||||
Income taxes |
95,000 | 31,500 | 31,296 | ||||||||||||||
Supplemental Schedule of Noncash Activities |
|||||||||||||||||
Loans exchanged for mortgage-backed securities |
6,667,082 | 6,708,253 | 3,991,087 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 37
notes to CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies of Charter One Financial, Inc. (Charter One or the Company), a financial holding company, and Charter One Bank, N.A. (the Bank), conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and prevailing practices within the banking industry. A summary of the more significant accounting policies follows:
Nature of Operations - Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, Charter One is a financial holding company. Charter One is a Delaware corporation and owns all of the outstanding capital stock of Charter One Bank, N.A. The Companys principal line of business is consumer banking which includes retail banking, mortgage banking and other related financial services. Retail banking provides a full range of deposit products, consumer loans, business lending and commercial real estate loans.
On January 7, 2002, the Company announced that the Bank filed an application with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to convert from a thrift to a national bank charter. The conversion was effective May 7, 2002 and resulted in changing the Banks name to Charter One Bank, N.A. References to Charter One Bank or the Bank shall mean Charter One Bank, N.A. or Charter One Bank, F.S.B. as the context requires.
On May 16, 2002, Charter One Commercial, a New York state-chartered commercial bank, was merged into the Bank. On August 9, 2002, Charter Bank, a Michigan state-chartered commercial bank, was merged into the Bank. On August 21, 2002, Charter Michigan Bancorp, Inc., a second-tier bank holding company, was merged into Charter One Financial, Inc.
Basis of Presentation - The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Certain items in the Consolidated Financial Statements for 2001 and 2000 have been reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, assumptions and judgments.
Securities - Securities consist of mortgage-backed securities, U.S. Government and federal agency obligations, floating-rate notes, corporate bonds, commercial paper and state and local government obligations. Securities are classified as trading, available for sale or held to maturity upon their acquisition. Securities classified as trading on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition are carried at estimated fair value with the unrealized holding gain or loss recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Securities classified as available for sale on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition are carried at estimated fair value with the unrealized holding gain or loss reflected as a component of shareholders equity. Securities classified as held to maturity on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition are carried at amortized cost. Premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income over the period to maturity by the level yield method. Realized gains or losses on the sale of debt securities are recorded based on the amortized cost of the specific securities sold.
Loans - Loans intended for sale are recorded at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. Net unrealized losses are recognized through a valuation allowance by a charge to income. Gains or losses on the sale of loans are determined under the specific identification method.
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of deferred fees or costs on originated loans or unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Discounts and premiums are accreted or amortized using the interest method over the remaining period to contractual maturity adjusted for anticipated prepayments. Unamortized net fees or costs are recognized upon early repayment of the loans. Unamortized net fees or costs on loans sold are included in the basis of the loans in calculating gains and losses.
A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. To determine if the impairment criteria have been met, the Bank performs a review of all corporate banking and commercial real estate loans over $1 million that are internally classified as substandard, doubtful or loss. If the impairment criteria have been met, a reserve is calculated according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.
Underperforming assets consist of (1) nonperforming loans (nonaccrual loans and leases, restructured real estate mortgage loans and real estate acquired through foreclosure and other collateral owned) and (2) accruing loans and leases delinquent more than 90 days. A loan or lease, including an impaired loan, is classified as nonaccrual when collectibility is in doubt. This is generally when the borrower is 90 days past due on contractual principal or interest payments on commercial real estate loans, corporate banking loans and leases. With respect to automobile loans, interest continues to accrue until the automobile loan reaches 120-day delinquency. At that point, the automobile loan is charged off completely. Consumer finance loans, along with other loans backed by single-family residential real estate collateral, continue to accrue interest until the loan is six payments past due, at which point the loan is placed on nonaccrual. A loan may be considered impaired but remain on accrual status when the borrower demonstrates (by continuing to
38 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
make payments) a willingness to keep the loans current. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest is reversed and an allowance is established by a charge to interest income equal to all accrued interest. Income is subsequently recognized only to the extent that cash payments are received. Loans are returned to accrual status when, in managements judgment, the borrower has the ability and intent to make periodic principal and interest payments (this generally requires that the loan be brought current in accordance with its original contractual terms). Loans and leases are classified as accruing loans or leases delinquent more than 90 days when the loan or lease is more than 90 days past due and, in managements judgment, the borrower has the ability and intent to make periodic interest and principal payments. Loans are classified as restructured when concessions are made to borrowers with respect to the principal balance, interest rate or other terms due to the inability of the borrower to meet the obligation under the original terms.
The Bank charges off principal at the earlier of (i) when a loss of principal has been deemed to have occurred as a result of the book value exceeding the fair value or net realizable value, or (ii) when collection efforts have ceased. Specifically with respect to automobile loans, if such loans experience repossession or bankruptcies prior to reaching the 120-day delinquency point, they are written down to the net realizable value of the collateral at the time of the repossession or bankruptcy discharge. Any automobile loan that reaches the 120-day delinquency point is charged off completely. Consumer finance loans, along with other loans backed by single-family residential real estate collateral, are reflected at the lower of cost or net realizable value at the earliest point of six payments past due or foreclosure.
Lease Accounting - The Company classifies leases at the inception of the lease in accordance with SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases. Estimated residual values are reviewed periodically and reduced if necessary.
Direct Financing Leases - At lease inception, the present values of future rentals and of the residual are recorded as net investment in direct financing leases. Unearned interest income is amortized to interest income over the lease term to produce a constant percentage return on the investment. Sales commissions and other direct costs incurred in direct financing leases are capitalized and recorded as part of the net investment in leases and are amortized over the lease term.
Sales-Type-Leases - At the inception of the lease, the present value of future rentals is recorded as an equipment sale. Equipment cost less the present value of the residual is recorded as cost of equipment sold. Accordingly, a dealer profit is recognized at lease inception. The present values of future rentals and of the residual are recorded as net investment in sales-type leases. Unearned income is amortized to interest income over the lease term to produce a constant percentage return on the investment.
Leveraged Leases - Income on leveraged leases is recognized at a constant rate of return on the outstanding investment in the lease, net of the related deferred tax liability.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses - The Company maintains an allowance for loan and lease losses adequate to absorb estimated probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio. The allowance for loan and lease losses consists of specific reserves for individual credits and general reserves for types or portfolios of loans based on historical loan loss experience, adjusted for concentrations and the current economic environment. All outstanding loans and leases are considered in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses. Increases to the allowance for loan and lease losses are made by charges to the provision for loan and lease losses. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Recoveries of previously charged-off amounts are credited to the allowance for loan and leases losses.
In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, management reviews and evaluates on a quarterly basis the potential credit risk in the loan and lease portfolio. This evaluation process is documented by senior management and approved by the Companys Board of Directors. Management evaluates homogeneous consumer oriented loans, such as 1-4 family mortgage loans and retail consumer loans, based upon all or a combination of delinquencies, credit scores, loss migration analysis and charge-off experience. Management supplements this analysis by reviewing the geographical lending areas involved and their local economic and political trends, the nature and volume of the portfolio, regulatory examination findings, specific grading systems applied and any other known factors which may impact future credit losses. Nonhomogeneous loans, generally defined as commercial real estate loans, corporate banking loans and leases, are underwritten, approved and risk rated individually at inception. On a monthly basis, management re-evaluates the risk ratings on these nonhomogeneous loans if loan relationships exceed certain dollar thresholds established for the respective portfolios. The Companys risk rating methodology uses nine grade levels to stratify each portfolio. Many factors are considered when these grades are assigned to individual loans and leases such as current and past delinquency, financial statements of the borrower, current net realizable value of collateral, the general economic environment and the specific economic trends affecting the individual loan or lease. During this evaluation process, individual loans are identified and evaluated for impairment as prescribed under SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan. Impairment losses are recognized when, based upon current information, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured either by a loans observable market value, fair value of the collateral or the present value of future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate. These impairment losses, combined with other probable losses as determined in the loan and lease portfolio evaluation process, are charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses. This data is then presented to the Companys Reserve Adequacy Committee, comprised of senior
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 39
members of management and independent directors. The Reserve Adequacy Committee determines the level of allowance for loan and lease losses necessary to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at an amount considered adequate to absorb probable loan and lease losses inherent in the portfolio. Although management believes that it uses the best information available to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations.
Loan Fees - Loan origination fees received for loans, net of direct origination costs, are deferred and amortized to interest income over the contractual lives of the loans using the level yield method. Fees received for loan commitments that are expected to be drawn, based on the Banks experience with similar commitments, are deferred and amortized over the lives of the loans using the level yield method. Fees for other loan commitments are deferred and amortized over the loan commitment period on a straight-line basis. Unamortized deferred loan fees or costs related to loans paid off are included in income. Unamortized net fees or costs on loans sold are included in the basis of the loans in calculating gains and losses. Amortization of net deferred fees is discontinued for loans that are deemed to be nonperforming.
Loan Servicing Assets - The cost of mortgage loans sold, with servicing rights retained, is allocated between the loans and the servicing rights based on their estimated fair values at time of loan sale. The estimated fair value of loan servicing assets is determined based on expected future cash flows discounted at an interest rate commensurate with the servicing risks involved. In 2002 and 2001, virtually all such recorded assets related to residential mortgage loans. Loan servicing assets are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition net of accumulated amortization, which is recorded in proportion to, and over the period of, net servicing income. Capitalized loan servicing assets are stratified based on predominant risk characteristics of underlying loans for the purpose of evaluating impairment. An allowance is then established in the event the recorded value of an individual stratum exceeds fair value.
Derivatives - The Company uses derivatives as a means of managing its interest rate risk profile (defined as the sensitivity of the Companys earnings and net portfolio value to changes in interest rates). Interest rate swaps are the derivative instruments that Charter One uses as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swap contracts are exchanges of interest payments, based on a common notional amount and maturity date.
For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, the Company designates the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as either a fair value or cash flow hedge in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. If it is determined that the derivative instrument is not highly effective as a hedge, hedge accounting would be discontinued and the change in the fair value of the derivative instrument would be recorded in net income.
Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments - In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into off-balance-sheet financial instruments consisting of commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, standby letters of credit and commitments to purchase or sell assets. Such financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements when they are funded or the related fees are incurred or received. The Company does not utilize any special-purpose entities in connection with off-balance-sheet financial instruments.
Premises and Equipment - Premises and equipment and real estate held for investment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the related assets.
Real Estate Owned - Real estate owned, including property acquired in settlement of foreclosed loans, is carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less estimated cost to sell at the date of foreclosure. Costs relating to the development and improvement of real estate owned are capitalized, whereas costs relating to holding and maintaining the property are charged to expense.
Goodwill - Goodwill represents the purchase price of acquired operations in excess of the fair value of their net identifiable assets at the date of acquisition. For business combinations and branch acquisitions initiated prior to June 30, 2001, goodwill was being amortized using the straight-line method over 15 years or less. Amortization of goodwill for past business combinations ceased upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets on January 1, 2002. For business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, goodwill is not subject to amortization in accordance with SFAS No. 142. Rather, goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis as of the beginning of each fiscal year or when events and circumstances indicate that the value of goodwill has been diminished or impaired.
Income Taxes - Income taxes have been provided using the liability method in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - - For purposes of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with a term of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash flows from interest rate risk management instruments are classified based on the assets or liabilities hedged.
Stock-Based Compensation - The Company applies Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations in accounting for its plans. Accordingly, no stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Had
40 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
stock-based employee compensation cost of the Companys stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, the Companys net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (per share data has been restated to reflect all stock dividends as of December 31, 2002):
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||
Net income: |
||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 500,714 | $ | 433,962 | ||||||
Less: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under the fair value method for all
awards, net of tax |
26,836 | 25,769 | 24,144 | |||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 550,832 | $ | 474,945 | $ | 409,818 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 2.52 | $ | 2.15 | $ | 1.84 | ||||||
Pro forma |
2.40 | 2.04 | 1.74 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
As reported |
2.45 | 2.10 | 1.81 | |||||||||
Pro forma |
2.33 | 1.99 | 1.71 |
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in 2002, 2001 and 2000:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
Dividend yield |
3.00 | % | 2.00 | % | 2.00 | % | ||||||
Volatility |
35.94-38.13 | % | 34.40-43.66 | % | 43.00-45.41 | % | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
3.41-4.98 | % | 4.42-5.55 | % | 5.20-6.78 | % | ||||||
Life of grant |
6 years | 7 years | 7 years |
The estimated weighted-average grant-date fair value (based on the above option-pricing model and assumptions) for options granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $8.90, $10.68 and $8.45, respectively.
Stock Dividends - On July 17, 2002, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 5% stock dividend which was distributed on September 30, 2002 to shareholders of record on September 13, 2002. On July 18, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 5% stock dividend which was distributed on September 28, 2001 to shareholders of record on September 14, 2001. On July 18, 2000, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 5% stock dividend which was distributed on September 30, 2000 to shareholders of record on September 14, 2000.
Earnings Per Share - Basic earnings per share (EPS) is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during the year. All shares and per share data have been restated to reflect all prior stock dividends.
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 500,714 | $ | 433,962 | |||||||||||
Weighted average common
shares outstanding |
229,302,385 | 232,547,418 | 235,617,650 | ||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 2.52 | $ | 2.15 | $ | 1.84 | |||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
|||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 500,714 | $ | 433,962 | |||||||||||
Weighted average common
shares outstanding |
229,302,385 | 232,547,418 | 235,617,650 | ||||||||||||||
Add common stock equivalents
for shares issuable under
stock option plans |
6,813,458 | 5,836,056 | 4,277,176 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted average common and
common equivalent shares
outstanding |
236,115,843 | 238,383,474 | 239,894,826 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 2.45 | $ | 2.10 | $ | 1.81 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive Income - In accordance with SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, reclassification adjustments have been determined for all components of other comprehensive income reported in the Companys Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity. Amounts presented within those statements are net of the following reclassification adjustments and related tax expense:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income, before tax: |
||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding gain on securities |
$ | 425,839 | $ | 134,689 | $ | 54,555 | ||||||
Reclassification adjustment for gains
included in net income |
(259,374 | ) | (112,804 | ) | (7,083 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income, before tax |
166,465 | 21,885 | 47,472 | |||||||||
Income tax expense related to items of other
comprehensive income |
57,942 | 7,761 | 16,599 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
$ | 108,523 | $ | 14,124 | $ | 30,873 | ||||||
Segments - Charter One has one operating segment, consumer banking, which offers an array of products and services to its customers. Pursuant to its consumer banking strategy, emphasis is placed on building relationships and identifying cross-sell opportunities with its customers, as opposed to building specific lines of business. As a result, Charter One works as an integrated unit, with business line emphasis and product offerings changing over time as needs and demands change.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 41
NOTE 2. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. These statements change the accounting for business combinations and goodwill. SFAS No. 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. Use of the pooling-of-interests method is prohibited. SFAS No. 142 changes the accounting for goodwill and certain intangible assets from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Any goodwill arising from business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 is not amortized. On an annual basis, and when there is reason to suspect that their values have been diminished or impaired, goodwill and certain intangible assets must be tested for impairment and write-downs may be necessary. Additionally, amortization of goodwill recorded for past business combinations ceased upon adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002.
SFAS No. 142 requires a transitional impairment test be applied to all goodwill within the first half of 2002 and any resulting impairment loss be reported as a change in accounting principle. The Company has performed a transitional impairment test on its goodwill assets as of January 1, 2002. No impairment loss was recognized as a result of this test. The Company will continue to perform its annual impairment test as of the beginning of each year.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections. SFAS No. 145 updates, clarifies, and simplifies certain existing accounting pronouncements beginning at various dates in 2002 and 2003. SFAS No. 145 rescinds SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, and SFAS No. 64, Extinguishments of Debt Made to Satisfy Sinking-Fund Requirements, which required net gains or losses from the extinguishment of debt to be classified as an extraordinary item in the income statement. These gains and losses will now be classified as extraordinary only if they meet the criteria for such classification as outlined in APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions, which allows for extraordinary treatment if the item is material and both unusual and infrequent in nature. SFAS No. 145 also rescinds SFAS No. 44, Accounting for Intangible Assets of Motor Carriers, related to the accounting for intangible assets for motor carriers and amends SFAS No. 13 to require certain lease modifications that have economic effects similar to sale-leaseback transactions to be accounted for as such. The Company early adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 145 related to the rescission of SFAS No. 4. As part of the early adoption, the Company reduced net gains in the other income section of the Consolidated Statements of Income to reflect all losses on extinguishment of debt that do not meet the criteria in APB No. 30. Such losses on extinguishment of debt were classified as extraordinary items in prior periods.
In October 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9. SFAS No. 72, Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking or Thrift Institutions, and FASB Interpretation No. 9, Applying APB Opinions No. 16 and 17 When a Savings and Loan Association or a Similar Institution Is Acquired in a Business Combination Accounted for by the Purchase Method, provided interpretive guidance on the application of the purchase method to acquisitions of financial institutions. Except for transactions between two or more mutual enterprises, SFAS No. 147 removes acquisitions of financial institutions from the scope of both SFAS No. 72 and Interpretation 9 and requires that those transactions be accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142. Thus, the requirement in SFAS No. 72 to recognize (and subsequently amortize) any excess of the fair value of liabilities assumed over the fair value of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired as an unidentifiable intangible asset no longer applies to acquisitions within the scope of SFAS No. 147. In addition, SFAS No. 147 amends SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, to include in its scope long-term customer-relationship intangible assets of financial institutions such as depositor- and borrower-relationship intangible assets and credit cardholder intangible assets. Consequently, those intangible assets are subject to the same undiscounted cash flow recoverability test and impairment loss recognition and measurement provisions that SFAS No. 144 requires for other long-lived assets that are held and used.
Effective September 30, 2002, the Company early adopted SFAS No. 147. In accordance with the transition provisions of SFAS No. 147, the Company reversed its amortization of goodwill related to branch acquisitions recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements since the Companys adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002. The amounts reversed to goodwill were $3.9 million, before tax, for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 and $3.8 million, before tax, for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, adding $.01 to previously reported earnings per share for each respective quarter.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. This interpretation expands the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees and requires the guarantor to recognize a liability for the fair value of an obligation assumed under a guarantee. FIN 45 clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, relating to guarantees. In general, FIN 45 applies to contracts or indemnification agreements that contingently require the guarantor to make payments to the guaranteed party based on changes in an underlying that is related to an asset, liability, or equity security of the guaranteed party. Certain guarantee contracts are excluded from both the disclosure and recognition requirements of FIN 45, including, among others, guarantees relating to employee compensation, residual value guarantees under
42 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
capital lease arrangements, commercial letters of credit, loan commitments, subordinated interests in a special purpose entity, and guarantees of a companys own future performance. Other guarantees are subject to the disclosure requirements of FIN 45 but not to the recognition provisions and include, among others, a guarantee accounted for as a derivative instrument under SFAS No. 133, a parents guarantee of debt owed to a third party by its subsidiary or vice versa, and a guarantee which is based on performance, not price. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are effective for the Company as of December 31, 2002, and require disclosure of the nature of the guarantee, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, and the current amount of the liability, if any, for the guarantors obligations under the guarantee. The recognition requirements of FIN 45 are to be applied prospectively to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. Guarantees that have been entered into by the Company are disclosed in Note 6 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company does not expect the requirements of FIN 45 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
On December 31, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. It also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure about the effects on reported net income of an entitys accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based employee compensation. Finally, SFAS No. 148 amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure about those effects in interim financial information. The Company has elected to continue application of APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation plans. Accordingly, no stock-based employee compensation cost is, or expected to be, reflected in net income, as all options granted under the Companys stock-based employee compensation plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. However, the pro forma impact of accounting for these stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value is, and will continue, to be disclosed in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. FIN 46 provides guidance on how to identify a variable interest entity (VIE) and determine when the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and results of operations of a VIE need to be included in a companys consolidated financial statements. FIN 46 also requires additional disclosures by primary beneficiaries and other significant variable interest holders. The provisions of the interpretation became effective upon issuance. The Company believes the adoption of this interpretation will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 3. BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
The tables below set forth the Companys business combinations and asset acquisitions during the past three years.
MERGERS
Assets at | Common | Method | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Date | Date of | Shares | Cash | of | Goodwill | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Completed | Merger | Issued | Consideration | Accounting | Recorded | ||||||||||||||||||
Charter National
Bancorp,
Inc.(1)(2) |
May 24, 2002 | $ | 353,231 | | $ | 90,425 | Purchase | $ | 34,793 | |||||||||||||||
Alliance
Bancorp(3) |
July 2, 2001 | 2,019,000 | 6,887,605 | 50,234 | Purchase | 138,814 |
(1) | The results of this acquisition have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements since May 24, 2002. Pro forma results of operations for this acquisition, had the acquisition occurred as of January 1, 2002 and January 1, 2001, is not significant and accordingly, is not provided. | |
(2) | The Company recorded $25.0 million as an indefinite-lived trademark name intangible in addition to the $34.8 million recorded as goodwill. | |
(3) | The results of this acquisition have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements since July 2, 2001. Pro forma results of operations for this acquisition, had the acquisition occurred as of January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2000, is not significant and accordingly, is not provided. |
BRANCH PURCHASES
Date | Deposits | Loans | Goodwill | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Branches | Completed | Assumed | Acquired | Recorded | |||||||||||||||
Superior Federal
Bank, F.S.B. |
17 | November 19, 2001 | $ | 1,022,023 | $ | 3,370 | $ | 55,984 |
The Company did not complete any business combinations or branch purchases in 2000.
Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002, the Company ceased its amortization of goodwill. The following table shows the pro forma effects of applying SFAS No. 142 to the 2001 and 2000 periods:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||
Reported net income |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 500,714 | $ | 433,962 | ||||||
Add: Goodwill amortization, after tax |
| 10,501 | 10,517 | |||||||||
Adjusted net income |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 511,215 | $ | 444,479 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Reported net income |
$ | 2.52 | $ | 2.15 | $ | 1.84 | ||||||
Add: Goodwill amortization, after tax |
| .05 | .04 | |||||||||
Adjusted net income |
$ | 2.52 | $ | 2.20 | $ | 1.88 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Reported net income |
$ | 2.45 | $ | 2.10 | $ | 1.81 | ||||||
Add: Goodwill amortization, after tax |
| .04 | .04 | |||||||||
Adjusted net income |
$ | 2.45 | $ | 2.14 | $ | 1.85 | ||||||
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 43
NOTE 4. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment securities at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, are as follows:
December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
Available
for Sale |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities |
$ | 92,477 | $ | 1,789 | $ | 2,804 | $ | 91,462 | ||||||||
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions |
1,849 | 49 | | 1,898 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
113,181 | 6,031 | 2,477 | 116,735 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities
available for sale |
207,507 | 7,869 | 5,281 | 210,095 | ||||||||||||
Held
to Maturity |
||||||||||||||||
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions |
3,943 | 303 | | 4,246 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
30 | | | 30 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities
held to maturity |
3,973 | 303 | | 4,276 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 211,480 | $ | 8,172 | $ | 5,281 | $ | 214,371 | ||||||||
December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
Available for Sale
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities |
$ | 30,344 | $ | 586 | $ | 1 | $ | 30,929 | ||||||||
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions |
8 | | | 8 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
101,899 | 830 | 4,354 | 98,375 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities
available for sale |
132,251 | 1,416 | 4,355 | 129,312 | ||||||||||||
Held
to Maturity |
||||||||||||||||
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions |
5,839 | 194 | 2 | 6,031 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
435 | 1 | | 436 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities
held to maturity |
6,274 | 195 | 2 | 6,467 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 138,525 | $ | 1,611 | $ | 4,357 | $ | 135,779 | ||||||||
December 31, 2000 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
Available
for Sale |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities |
$ | 334,065 | $ | 252 | $ | 417 | $ | 333,900 | ||||||||
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions |
11 | | | 11 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
102,032 | 710 | 9,952 | 92,790 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities
available for sale |
436,108 | 962 | 10,369 | 426,701 | ||||||||||||
Held to Maturity |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities |
15,000 | 3 | | 15,003 | ||||||||||||
Securities of U.S. states and
political subdivisions |
7,074 | 160 | 6 | 7,228 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
440 | | | 440 | ||||||||||||
Total investment securities
held to maturity |
22,514 | 163 | 6 | 22,671 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 458,622 | $ | 1,125 | $ | 10,375 | $ | 449,372 | ||||||||
The weighted average interest rate on investment securities was 5.64%, 8.21% and 7.40% at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Investment securities by contractual maturity as of December 31, 2002 are shown below:
Due After One But | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due Within One Year | Within Five Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Cost | Value | Yield | Cost | Value | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities |
$ | 27,142 | $ | 27,192 | 2.04 | % | $ | 19,742 | $ | 20,855 | 4.08 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities of U.S.
states and political
subdivisions |
391 | 393 | 2.85 | 2,834 | 3,013 | 4.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other
securities |
1,704 | 1,703 | 2.41 | 7,215 | 7,435 | 4.94 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 29,237 | $ | 29,288 | 2.07 | % | $ | 29,791 | $ | 31,303 | 4.32 | % | ||||||||||||
Due After Five But | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Within Ten Years | Due After Ten Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Cost | Value | Yield | Cost | Value | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and
agency securities |
$ | 2,275 | $ | 2,373 | 3.43 | % | $ | 43,318 | $ | 41,042 | 1.76 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities of U.S.
states and political
subdivisions |
2,567 | 2,738 | 4.82 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other
securities |
| | | 104,292 | 107,627 | 8.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,842 | $ | 5,111 | 4.17 | % | $ | 147,610 | $ | 148,669 | 6.66 | % | ||||||||||||
Gains on sales were $.4 million, $3.2 million and $11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Losses on sales were $29,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. No losses on sales were realized during the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
44 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
NOTE 5. MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
Mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, are as follows:
December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Available for Sale |
|||||||||||||||||
Participation certificates: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
$ | 9,836,607 | $ | 214,670 | $ | 231 | $ | 10,051,046 | |||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
1,065,021 | 3,996 | 499 | 1,068,518 | |||||||||||||
Private issues |
412,247 | 5,156 | 359 | 417,044 | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed
securities available for sale |
11,313,875 | 223,822 | 1,089 | 11,536,608 | |||||||||||||
Held to Maturity |
|||||||||||||||||
Participation certificates: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
311,398 | 16,391 | 6 | 327,783 | |||||||||||||
Private issues |
51,717 | 399 | 11 | 52,105 | |||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
96,130 | 4,806 | | 100,936 | |||||||||||||
Private issues |
81,536 | 2,741 | 29 | 84,248 | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed
securities held to maturity |
540,781 | 24,337 | 46 | 565,072 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 11,854,656 | $ | 248,159 | $ | 1,135 | $ | 12,101,680 | |||||||||
December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Available for Sale |
|||||||||||||||||
Participation certificates: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
$ | 6,914,397 | $ | 58,000 | $ | 21,972 | $ | 6,950,425 | |||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
508,093 | 10,168 | 10 | 518,251 | |||||||||||||
Private issues |
545,998 | 16,245 | 407 | 561,836 | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed
securities available for sale |
7,968,488 | 84,413 | 22,389 | 8,030,512 | |||||||||||||
Held to Maturity |
|||||||||||||||||
Participation certificates: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
475,622 | 19,871 | 4 | 495,489 | |||||||||||||
Private issues |
90,203 | 973 | 171 | 91,005 | |||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
185,944 | 10,187 | 80 | 196,051 | |||||||||||||
Private issues |
232,135 | 8,212 | 234 | 240,113 | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed
securities held to maturity |
983,904 | 39,243 | 489 | 1,022,658 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,952,392 | $ | 123,656 | $ | 22,878 | $ | 9,053,170 | |||||||||
December 31, 2000 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Available for Sale |
|||||||||||||||||
Participation certificates: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
$ | 3,012,369 | $ | 39,162 | $ | 3,959 | $ | 3,047,572 | |||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
519,746 | 4,970 | 722 | 523,994 | |||||||||||||
Private issues |
507,395 | 9,840 | 1,605 | 515,630 | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed
securities available for sale |
4,039,510 | 53,972 | 6,286 | 4,087,196 | |||||||||||||
Held to Maturity |
|||||||||||||||||
Participation certificates: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
672,638 | 12,600 | 308 | 684,930 | |||||||||||||
Private issues |
128,407 | 518 | 1,787 | 127,138 | |||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations: |
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and
agency issues |
268,575 | 9,139 | 439 | 277,275 | |||||||||||||
Private issues |
436,555 | 7,351 | 1,724 | 442,182 | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed
securities held to maturity |
1,506,175 | 29,608 | 4,258 | 1,531,525 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,545,685 | $ | 83,580 | $ | 10,544 | $ | 5,618,721 | |||||||||
Sales of mortgage-backed securities resulted in gains of $260.0 million in 2002, $109.6 million in 2001 and $19.7 million in 2000. Losses on sales were $1.0 million in 2002 and $23.9 million in 2000. No losses on sales were realized in 2001.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 45
NOTE 6. LOANS AND LEASES
Loans and leases consist of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of | % of | % of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Total | Amount | Total | Amount | Total | Amount | Total | Amount | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Permanent: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One-to-four family |
$ | 7,905,585 | 30.6 | % | $ | 9,317,810 | 36.7 | % | $ | 10,413,005 | 43.5 | % | $ | 11,365,545 | 51.1 | % | $ | 13,311,870 | 60.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily |
737,517 | 2.8 | 989,169 | 3.9 | 1,064,796 | 4.4 | 1,224,348 | 5.5 | 1,027,320 | 4.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
1,027,681 | 4.0 | 1,076,493 | 4.2 | 769,589 | 3.2 | 624,517 | 2.8 | 663,448 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total permanent |
9,670,783 | 37.4 | 11,383,472 | 44.8 | 12,247,390 | 51.1 | 13,214,410 | 59.4 | 15,002,638 | 68.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One-to-four family |
719,062 | 2.8 | 666,982 | 2.6 | 611,317 | 2.6 | 486,512 | 2.2 | 453,762 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multifamily |
377,489 | 1.4 | 359,848 | 1.4 | 90,129 | .4 | 75,171 | .3 | 45,064 | .2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
378,466 | 1.5 | 313,725 | 1.3 | 163,544 | .6 | 92,993 | .4 | 73,641 | .3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total construction |
1,475,017 | 5.7 | 1,340,555 | 5.3 | 864,990 | 3.6 | 654,676 | 2.9 | 572,467 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total real estate mortgage loans |
11,145,800 | 43.1 | 12,724,027 | 50.1 | 13,112,380 | 54.7 | 13,869,086 | 62.3 | 15,575,105 | 70.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail consumer loans |
5,441,269 | 21.0 | 4,808,390 | 18.9 | 4,583,770 | 19.1 | 3,745,633 | 16.8 | 2,841,225 | 12.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automobile loans |
5,394,764 | 20.9 | 4,244,070 | 16.7 | 3,046,038 | 12.7 | 2,413,531 | 10.8 | 2,011,968 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer finance loans |
971,335 | 3.8 | 1,027,392 | 4.0 | 974,852 | 4.1 | 700,259 | 3.2 | 443,301 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leases |
2,133,468 | 8.2 | 1,994,524 | 7.9 | 1,778,021 | 7.4 | 1,137,895 | 5.1 | 734,152 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate banking loans |
1,314,781 | 5.1 | 1,043,714 | 4.1 | 802,379 | 3.4 | 679,397 | 3.0 | 575,042 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
loans and leases held for investment |
26,401,417 | 102.1 | 25,842,117 | 101.7 | 24,297,440 | 101.4 | 22,545,801 | 101.2 | 22,180,793 | 100.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans in process |
469,484 | 1.8 | 387,264 | 1.5 | 345,341 | 1.4 | 259,680 | 1.2 | 163,277 | .8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized net discounts
(premiums) |
2,646 | | 20,527 | | (6,763 | ) | | (7,430 | ) | | (14,282 | ) | (.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan and
lease losses |
328,017 | 1.2 | 255,478 | 1.0 | 189,616 | .8 | 186,400 | .8 | 184,989 | .8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net deferred loan costs |
(84,285 | ) | (.3 | ) | (86,007 | ) | (.3 | ) | (83,388 | ) | (.4 | ) | (91,133 | ) | (.4 | ) | (66,927 | ) | (.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Automobile dealer reserve |
(167,291 | ) | (.6 | ) | (131,216 | ) | (.5 | ) | (97,538 | ) | (.4 | ) | (78,578 | ) | (.4 | ) | (65,214 | ) | (.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net items |
548,571 | 2.1 | 446,046 | 1.7 | 347,268 | 1.4 | 268,939 | 1.2 | 201,843 | .9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and leases held for
investment, net |
$ | 25,852,846 | 100.0 | % | $ | 25,396,071 | 100.0 | % | $ | 23,950,172 | 100.0 | % | $ | 22,276,862 | 100.0 | % | $ | 21,978,950 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
$ | 351,892 | $ | 332,629 | $ | 58,002 | $ | 35,988 | $ | 240,461 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan servicing portfolio |
$ | 16,893,609 | $ | 13,846,807 | $ | 10,379,644 | $ | 10,798,563 | $ | 9,916,922 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2002, there was no concentration of loans or leases in any type of industry which exceeded 10% of the Banks total loans and leases that is not included as a loan or lease category in the table above.
The following table reflects the principal payments contractually due (assuming no prepayments) on the Banks construction portfolio, net of loans in process, and corporate banking loan portfolio at December 31, 2002. Management expects prepayments will cause actual maturities to be shorter.
Principal Payments Contractually Due in the Year(s) Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2008 and | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2004-2007 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||
Construction loans |
$ | 765,246 | $ | 168,276 | $ | 8,648 | $ | 942,170 | ||||||||
Corporate banking loans |
301,872 | 608,957 | 403,934 | 1,314,763 | ||||||||||||
Total(1) |
$ | 1,067,118 | $ | 777,233 | $ | 412,582 | $ | 2,256,933 | ||||||||
(1) | Of the $1.2 billion of loans due after December 31, 2003, 39% are fixed rate and 61% are adjustable rate. |
46 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
The Company normally has outstanding a number of commitments to extend credit. At December 31, 2002, there were outstanding commitments to originate $2.2 billion of mortgage loans and other loans and leases, all at market rates. Terms of the commitments extend up to nine months, but are generally less than two months.
At December 31, 2002, there were also outstanding unfunded consumer lines of credit of $4.4 billion and corporate banking lines of credit of $428.5 million. Substantially all of the consumer loans, including consumer lines of credit, are secured by equity in the borrowers residences. The Company does not expect all of these lines to be used by the borrowers. Outstanding letters of credit totaled $85.5 million as of December 31, 2002.
The Bank is engaged in equipment leasing through a subsidiary, ICX Corporation (ICX). The equipment leased by ICX is for commercial and industrial use only, with primary lease concentrations to Fortune 1000 companies for large capital equipment acquisitions. A lessee is evaluated from a credit perspective using the same underwriting standards and procedures as for a borrower. A lessee is expected to be able to make the rental payments based on its business cash flow and the strength of its balance sheet. Leases are usually not evaluated as collateral-based transactions and, therefore, the lessees overall financial strength is the most important credit evaluation factor.
A summary of the investment in leases, before the allowance for lease losses, is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
Direct financing leases |
$ | 1,347,510 | $ | 1,277,979 | ||||||
Sales-type leases |
47,633 | 49,793 | ||||||||
Leveraged leases |
738,325 | 666,752 | ||||||||
Total lease financings |
$ | 2,133,468 | $ | 1,994,524 | ||||||
The components of the investment in lease financings, before the allowance for lease losses, are as follows:
December 31, | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||
Total future minimum lease rentals |
$ | 1,435,427 | $ | 1,512,225 | |||||
Estimated residual value of leased equipment |
1,319,045 | 1,076,772 | |||||||
Initial direct costs |
11,932 | 11,397 | |||||||
Less unearned income on minimum lease rentals
and estimated residual value of leased equipment |
632,936 | 605,870 | |||||||
Total lease financings |
$ | 2,133,468 | $ | 1,994,524 | |||||
At December 31, 2002, future minimum lease rentals on direct financing, sales-type and leveraged leases are as follows: $270.1 million in 2003; $234.0 million in 2004; $196.5 million in 2005; $147.4 million in 2006; $111.8 million in 2007; and $475.6 million thereafter.
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 255,478 | $ | 189,616 | $ | 186,400 | ||||||
Provision |
192,003 | 100,766 | 54,205 | |||||||||
Acquired through business combination |
3,184 | 33,782 | | |||||||||
Charge-offs |
(145,094 | ) | (78,459 | ) | (60,331 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries |
22,446 | 9,773 | 9,342 | |||||||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 328,017 | $ | 255,478 | $ | 189,616 | ||||||
The total investment in impaired loans was $20.3 million and $12.3 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. These loans were subject to allowances for loan and lease losses of $3.8 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001.
The average recorded investment in impaired loans was $25.1 million, $10.9 million, and $21.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Interest income recognized was $1.0 million, $.7 million and $.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The interest income potential based upon the original terms of the contracts for these impaired loans was $2.3 million, $1.0 million, and $2.1 million for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
NOTE 7. LOAN SERVICING ASSETS
Activity in loan servicing assets is summarized as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 139,840 | $ | 121,735 | ||||
Amount capitalized |
100,430 | 61,897 | ||||||
Amortization |
(30,151 | ) | (19,178 | ) | ||||
Impairment charges |
(4,500 | ) | | |||||
Net change in valuation allowance |
(77,055 | ) | (24,614 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 128,564 | $ | 139,840 | ||||
Loans serviced for others were $16.9 billion and $13.8 billion at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the fair value of loan servicing assets approximated their respective book value.
The Bank securitized residential mortgage and consumer loans of $6.7 billion in both 2002 and 2001, respectively, in which the Bank retained servicing. The residential mortgage and consumer loans were exchanged for government agency mortgage-backed securities. The Bank did not retain any credit enhancing residual interests, nor is the Bank subject to any significant recourse obligations. The Company does not hold any interests in or sponsor any special-purpose entities.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 47
NOTE 8. DEPOSITS
Deposits consist of the following:
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Rate | Amount | Rate | Amount | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Checking accounts: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing |
$ | 7,460,530 | 1.80 | % | $ | 5,973,545 | 2.45 | % | $ | 2,547,726 | 2.68 | % | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest-
bearing |
2,189,903 | | 1,856,481 | | 1,394,186 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Money market
and savings
accounts |
8,157,534 | 1.51 | 6,737,160 | 2.26 | 5,486,158 | 3.30 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates
of deposit |
9,719,876 | 3.61 | 10,556,123 | 4.43 | 10,177,601 | 5.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits,
net |
$ | 27,527,843 | 2.21 | $ | 25,123,309 | 3.05 | $ | 19,605,671 | 4.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Including the
effect of interest
rate swaps |
2.06 | % | 2.88 | % | 4.35 | % |
A summary of all certificates of deposit by maturity follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | December 31, 2002 | |||
Within 12 months |
$ | 5,530,794 | ||
Over 12 months to 36 months |
2,264,767 | |||
Over 36 months |
1,924,315 | |||
Total |
$ | 9,719,876 | ||
A summary of certificates of deposit with balances of $100,000 or more by maturity follows:
(Dollars in thousands) | December 31, 2002 | |||
Three months or less |
$ | 235,043 | ||
Over three months to six months |
335,457 | |||
Over six months to twelve months |
559,363 | |||
Over twelve months |
875,751 | |||
Total |
$ | 2,005,614 | ||
Investment securities and mortgage-backed securities with a par value of $489.0 million, $573.0 million and $594.6 million at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, are pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law.
NOTE 9. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADVANCES
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances at December 31, 2002 are secured by the Companys investment in the stock of the FHLB, as well as $11.0 billion in certain real estate loans and $3.1 billion in mortgage-backed securities. FHLB advances are comprised of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Rate | Amount | Rate | |||||||||||||
Fixed rate advances |
$ | 8,619,560 | 4.37 | % | $ | 8,218,827 | 5.19 | % | ||||||||
Variable rate advances |
409,605 | 1.23 | 424,477 | 1.75 | ||||||||||||
Total advances |
9,029,165 | 4.23 | 8,643,304 | 5.02 | ||||||||||||
Plus amortized premium on advances |
8,760 | | 13,934 | | ||||||||||||
Total advances, net |
$ | 9,037,925 | 4.18 | $ | 8,657,238 | 4.95 | ||||||||||
Including the effect of interest
rate swaps |
4.26 | % | 5.02 | % | ||||||||||||
Scheduled repayments of FHLB advances are as follows:
December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Fixed Rate Advances | Variable Rate Advances | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Rate | Amount | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturing in: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
$ | 2,595,000 | 1.34 | % | $ | | | % | |||||||||||||||||
2004 |
125,000 | 5.64 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
2,265,200 | 6.23 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
500,088 | 4.98 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
2,017,095 | 5.49 | 173,743 | 1.22 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
1,117,177 | 5.20 | 235,862 | 1.24 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total advances, net |
$ | 8,619,560 | 4.37 | % | $ | 409,605 | 1.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2002, certain fixed rate agreements are convertible to LIBOR at the counterpartys option beginning in 2003. If the counterparty exercises its option, the Company can prepay the advance in full or part on the effective conversion date or on the quarterly repricing date.
NOTE 10. FEDERAL FUNDS PURCHASED AND REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements consist of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||
Amount | Rate | Amount | Rate | |||||||||||||||
Due within 30 days |
$ | 283,912 | 1.33 | % | $ | 203,259 | 1.67 | % |
48 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
NOTE 11. OTHER BORROWINGS
Other borrowings consist of the following:
December 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||
Subordinated notes, due May 2012,
interest payable semi-annually at 6.375%
(net of unamortized discount of
$2.0 million in 2002) |
$ | 398,010 | $ | | ||||
Senior notes, due February 15, 2004,
interest payable at 7.125% (net of
unamortized discount of $.3 million in
2002 and $.6 million in 2001) |
94,782 | 94,524 | ||||||
Zero coupon bonds of $151 million at
December 31, 2002 and 2001, due
February 2005, with yield to maturity
of 11.37% |
118,767 | 106,162 | ||||||
Installment obligations without recourse |
80,308 | 85,482 | ||||||
Variable-rate bonds, due December 1, 2015,
interest payable semi-annually at 4.75%
with a ceiling of 9.50% |
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Other |
6,986 | 8,242 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 708,853 | $ | 304,410 | ||||
The zero coupon bonds are collateralized by mortgage-backed securities with a par value of $229.2 million and $202.3 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
On May 20, 2002, Charter One Bank issued $400.0 million of 6.375% subordinated notes due May 15, 2012. Interest on the subordinated notes is payable semiannually. The subordinated notes are subordinated to the claims of depositors and other creditors of Charter One Bank, except liabilities which by their terms rank equally with or are subordinate to the subordinated notes. Each subordinated note is Charter One Banks direct, unconditional and unsecured general obligation. The net proceeds from the subordinated notes were used by the Bank for general corporate purposes.
NOTE 12. INTEREST RATE SWAPS
The Company uses interest rate swaps as one of the tools to manage its interest rate risk profile (defined as the sensitivity of our earnings and economic value to changes in interest rates). The Company utilizes fixed receipt callable interest rate swaps to convert certain longer-term callable certificates of deposit into short-term and medium-term variable instruments. Under certain of these agreements, Charter One has agreed to receive interest from the counterparty on a notional amount at a fixed rate defined in the agreement and to pay interest at a floating rate indexed to LIBOR during the entire term of the interest rate swap. In other agreements, Charter One has agreed to receive interest from the counterparty on a notional amount at a fixed rate defined in the agreement, and to pay interest at a fixed rate, converting to floating rate indexed to LIBOR after the first two years of the interest rate swap term. Such interest rate swaps are designated and qualify as fair value hedges under SFAS No. 133. The Company has assumed no ineffectiveness in the respective hedging relationships. Any gain or loss on the interest rate swap was offset by a gain or loss on the certificates of deposit during the period of change in fair values.
The Company utilizes fixed payment interest rate swaps to convert certain floating-rate FHLB advances into fixed-rate instruments. Under these agreements, Charter One has agreed to pay interest to the counterparty on a notional principal amount at a fixed rate defined in the agreement and receive interest at a floating rate indexed to LIBOR. The amounts of interest exchanged are calculated on the basis of notional principal amounts. Such interest rate swaps are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133. We have assumed no ineffectiveness in the respective hedging relationships. Any gain or loss on the interest rate swaps was offset by the expected future cash flows on the FHLB advances during the period of change in fair values.
The Company utilized a fixed receipt interest rate swap to convert our $400.0 million of subordinated notes into a variable instrument. Under this agreement, Charter One has agreed to receive interest from the counterparty on a notional amount at a fixed rate defined in the agreement and to pay interest at a floating rate indexed to LIBOR. Such interest rate swap is designated and qualifies as a fair value hedge under SFAS No. 133. The Company assumed no ineffectiveness in the hedging relationship. Any gain or loss on the interest rate swap was offset by a gain or loss on the subordinated notes during the period of change in fair values.
Additionally, on May 20, 2002, the Company entered into $575.0 million of fixed payment and variable receipt interest rate swaps related to the issuance of the subordinated notes discussed above. However, these interest rate swaps did not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the net unrealized loss of $25.9 million attributed to these interest rate swaps was recognized in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Income under the caption net gains. The corresponding interest rate swap liabilities were recognized in the Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 2002 under the caption accrued expenses and other liabilities.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 49
Information on the interest rate swaps, by maturity date, is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Receiving | Paying | Receiving | Paying | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Notional | Interest | Interest | Notional | Interest | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Rate | Rate | Amount | Rate | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Payment
and Fixed
Receipt (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 1,005,000 | 4.31 | % | 2.75 | % | $ | | | % | | % | ||||||||||||||
Fixed Payment
and Variable
Receipt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
$ | | | % | | % | $ | 25,000 | 3.73 | % | 6.44 | % | ||||||||||||||
2003 |
409,605 | 1.42 | 3.55 | 409,605 | 1.94 | 3.55 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
375,000 | 1.40 | 3.66 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
200,000 | 1.40 | 4.69 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 984,605 | 1.41 | %(2) | 3.82 | % | $ | 434,605 | 2.04 | %(2) | 3.71 | % | ||||||||||||||
Variable Payment
and Fixed Receipt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
$ | | | % | | % | $ | 255,000 | 4.08 | % | 2.14 | % | ||||||||||||||
2004 |
315,000 | 2.80 | 1.57 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
| | | 930,000 | 5.80 | 2.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
555,000 | 5.51 | 1.55 | 10,000 | 7.25 | 2.36 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
| | | 10,000 | 7.40 | 2.06 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
| | | 45,000 | 6.33 | 1.94 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
400,000 | 5.76 | 1.75 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,270,000 | 4.92 | % | 1.62 | %(2) | $ | 1,250,000 | 5.49 | % | 2.12 | %(2) | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Converts to variable payment indexed to LIBOR after the first two years of the interest rate swap agreement. | |
(2) | Rates are based on LIBOR. |
The fair value of the Companys interest rate swap contracts is estimated as the difference in the present value of future cash flows between the Companys existing agreements and current market rate agreements of the same duration. Information on the fair values of the interest rate swaps is as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||
Unrealized gain (loss): |
||||||||
Fair value hedges |
$ | 84,341 | $ | 23,376 | ||||
Cash flow hedges |
(7,043 | ) | (3,584 | ) | ||||
Unhedged interest rate swaps |
(25,905 | ) | | |||||
Total fair value |
$ | 51,393 | $ | 19,792 | ||||
The net benefit of interest rate swaps included in interest expense is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||
Interest (income) expense: |
||||||||||||
Deposits |
$ | (44,792 | ) | $ | (21,774 | ) | $ | (8,879 | ) | |||
FHLB advances |
7,317 | 1,241 | | |||||||||
Subordinated notes |
(9,792 | ) | | | ||||||||
Unhedged interest rate swaps |
7,903 | | | |||||||||
Total |
$ | (39,364 | ) | $ | (20,533 | ) | $ | (8,879 | ) | |||
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the swap counterparties; however, the Company does not currently anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties.
NOTE 13. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of the following components:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
Current |
$ | 111,810 | $ | 46,396 | $ | 33,463 | |||||||
Deferred |
156,923 | 186,502 | 170,321 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 268,733 | $ | 232,898 | $ | 203,784 | |||||||
A reconciliation from tax at the statutory rate to the income tax provision is as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Rate | Amount | Rate | Amount | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Tax at statutory rate |
$ | 296,240 | 35.0 | % | $ | 257,057 | 35.0 | % | $ | 223,211 | 35.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Decrease due to: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
(12,878 | ) | (1.5 | ) | (13,615 | ) | (1.9 | ) | (13,429 | ) | (2.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
General business credits |
(5,000 | ) | (.6 | ) | (3,443 | ) | (.5 | ) | (2,500 | ) | (.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
EISOP dividends |
(4,333 | ) | (.5 | ) | (440 | ) | (.1 | ) | (440 | ) | (.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
(5,296 | ) | (.6 | ) | (6,661 | ) | (.8 | ) | (3,058 | ) | (.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
$ | 268,733 | 31.8 | % | $ | 232,898 | 31.7 | % | $ | 203,784 | 32.0 | % | |||||||||||||
50 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
Significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
|||||||||||||
Book allowance for loan losses |
$ | 108,561 | $ | 84,466 | $ | 62,581 | |||||||
Accrued and deferred compensation |
3,010 | 1,936 | 3,267 | ||||||||||
Alternative minimum tax credit |
| 47,638 | 53,728 | ||||||||||
Other |
2,088 | 27,886 | 53,170 | ||||||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
113,659 | 161,926 | 172,746 | ||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|||||||||||||
Leasing activities, net |
663,145 | 557,246 | 386,053 | ||||||||||
FHLB stock dividend |
68,824 | 58,018 | 45,307 | ||||||||||
Deferred loan costs |
29,533 | 28,731 | 29,136 | ||||||||||
Tax allowance for loan losses |
932 | 2,285 | 3,640 | ||||||||||
Net unrealized gain on securities |
78,528 | 20,586 | 12,825 | ||||||||||
Other |
371 | 10,099 | 44,346 | ||||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
841,333 | 676,965 | 521,307 | ||||||||||
Net deferred tax liability |
$ | (727,674 | ) | $ | (515,039 | ) | $ | (348,561 | ) | ||||
In 2002 and 2001, Charter One recaptured excess bad debt reserves of $4.0 million and $3.8 million, respectively, resulting in payments of $1.4 million and $1.3 million which were previously accrued. The pre-1988 reserve provisions are subject only to recapture requirements in the case of certain excess distributions to, and redemptions of, shareholders or if the Bank no longer qualifies as a bank. Tax bad debt deductions accumulated prior to 1988 by the Bank are approximately $321.3 million. No deferred income taxes have been provided on these bad debt deductions and no recapture of these amounts is anticipated.
NOTE 14. REGULATORY MATTERS
Federal Reserve Board (FRB) regulations require depository institutions to maintain certain minimum reserve balances. These reserves, which consisted of vault cash and deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank, totaled $56.1 million and $78.5 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Bank may not declare or pay cash dividends on its shares of common stock if the payment would cause shareholders equity to be reduced below applicable regulatory capital maintenance requirements, or if such declaration and payment would otherwise violate regulatory requirements. At December 31, 2002, approximately $463.7 million of the Companys retained earnings was available to pay dividends to shareholders or to be used for other corporate purposes.
As a financial holding company, Charter One is subject to regulation by the FRB under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 as amended, and the regulations of the FRB, including various capital requirements. The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the OCC. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly discretionary, actions by each regulator that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, specific capital guidelines must be met that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The institutions capital classification is also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Charter One and the Bank to individually maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and Tier 1 capital to average assets. The actual regulatory capital ratios calculated for Charter One and Charter One Bank, N.A., along with the capital amounts and ratios for capital adequacy purposes and the amounts required to be categorized as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action are as follows:
December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
To Be Well Capitalized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Capital | Under Prompt Corrective | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Adequacy Purposes | Action Provisions | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
Charter One:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
|
$ | 3,239,604 | 11.67 | % | $ | 2,220,734 | >8.00 | % | $ | 2,775,917 | >10.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
2,513,577 | 9.05 | 1,110,367 | >4.00 | 1,665,550 | >6.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
2,513,577 | 6.10 | 1,648,861 | >4.00 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||
Charter One Bank(1)(2):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets
|
3,150,686 | 11.36 | 2,219,719 | >8.00 | 2,774,649 | >10.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
|
2,091,615 | 7.54 | 1,109,860 | >4.00 | 1,664,789 | >6.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
2,091,615 | 5.11 | 1,636,187 | >4.00 | 2,045,234 | >5.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 51
December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
To Be "Well Capitalized" | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Capital | Under Prompt Corrective | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Adequacy Purposes | Action Provisions | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
Charter One: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to
risk-weighted
assets |
$ | 2,773,390 | 10.23 | % | $ | 2,168,434 | >8.00 | % | $ | 2,710,542 | >10.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted
assets |
2,517,875 | 9.29 | 1,084,217 | >4.00 | 1,626,325 | >6.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to
average assets |
2,517,875 | 6.81 | 1,479,451 | >4.00 | 1,849,313 | >5.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Charter One Commercial (1): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to
risk-weighted
assets |
39,729 | 46.21 | 6,877 | >8.00 | 8,597 | >10.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted
assets |
39,729 | 46.21 | 3,439 | >4.00 | 5,158 | >6.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to
average assets |
39,729 | 13.72 | 11,579 | >4.00 | 14,474 | >5.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Charter One Bank (2): |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to
risk-weighted
assets |
2,659,977 | 10.01 | 2,125,856 | >8.00 | 2,657,320 | >10.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted
assets |
1,910,830 | 7.19 | N/A | N/A | 1,594,392 | >6.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Core capital to
adjusted tangible
assets |
1,932,552 | 5.12 | 1,509,358 | >4.00 | 1,886,698 | >5.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
Tangible capital to
tangible assets |
1,932,552 | 5.12 | 566,009 | >1.50 | N/A | N/A |
(1) | On May 16, 2002, Charter One Commercial merged into Charter One Bank. At December 31, 2001, Charter One Commercial was subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FDIC. | |
(2) | On May 7, 2002, Charter One Bank converted from a thrift to a national bank. At December 31, 2001, Charter One Bank was subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Office of Thrift Supervision. |
Management believes that, as of December 31, 2002, Charter One and Charter One Bank, individually met the capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject. Events beyond managements control, such as fluctuations in interest rates or a downturn in the economy in areas in which the institutions loans and securities are concentrated could adversely affect future earnings and, consequently, the institutions ability to meet its future capital requirements.
NOTE 15. STOCK PURCHASE RIGHTS
Under the Amended and Restated Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement, each share of the Companys common stock outstanding entitles the shareholder to one stock purchase right. Each right will entitle its holder to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of a new series of preferred stock (Series A Preferred Stock), at a price of $100.00 (subject to adjustment) (the Exercise Price) and will generally become exercisable if any person or group (1) acquires 20% or more of the Companys common stock or (2) commences a tender or exchange offer to acquire 20% or more of the Companys common stock. Upon announcement that any person or group has acquired 20% or more of the Companys common stock (Acquiring Person), rights owned by the Acquiring Person will become void and each other right will flip-in, entitling its holder to purchase for the Exercise Price either Series A Preferred Stock or, at the option of the Company, common stock, having a market value of twice the Exercise Price. In addition, after any person has become an Acquiring Person, the Company may not consolidate or merge with any person or sell 50% or more of its assets or earning power to any person if at the time of such merger or sale the Acquiring Person controls the Companys Board of Directors and, in the case of a merger, will receive different treatment than the other shareholders, unless provision is made such that each right would thereafter entitle its holder to buy, for the Exercise Price, the number of shares of common stock of such other person having a market value of twice the Exercise Price.
The rights may be redeemed by the Company for $.01 per right at any time prior to an acquisition of 20% or more of the common stock of the Company. The rights will expire on October 20, 2009 or before that date under certain circumstances, including in connection with the acquisition of the Company in a merger before any person has acquired more than 20% of the Companys common stock.
NOTE 16. STOCK OPTION PLANS
At December 31, 2002, the Company has several stock option plans under which 16.1 million shares of common stock are reserved for grant to officers, key employees and directors. All of the Companys plans have been approved by the Companys shareholders. The date on which the options are first exercisable is determined by the Stock Option Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee). The options expire no later than 10 years from the grant date.
52 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
The following is an analysis of the stock option activity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 and the stock options outstanding at the end of the respective periods. Amounts have been restated to reflect all prior stock dividends.
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Number of | Exercise Price of | |||||||
Option Shares | Option Shares | |||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2000 |
20,744,971 | $ | 15.23 | |||||
Granted |
4,402,921 | 16.49 | ||||||
Exercised |
(2,358,796 | ) | 10.28 | |||||
Forfeited |
(848,342 | ) | 19.85 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2000 |
21,940,754 | 15.84 | ||||||
Granted |
8,182,394 | 24.71 | ||||||
Acquired through acquisition |
1,086,212 | 16.70 | ||||||
Exercised |
(3,082,959 | ) | 11.29 | |||||
Forfeited |
(634,713 | ) | 19.39 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2001 |
27,491,688 | 18.94 | ||||||
Granted |
4,643,260 | 28.72 | ||||||
Exercised |
(3,206,736 | ) | 13.27 | |||||
Forfeited |
(357,655 | ) | 22.61 | |||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2002 |
28,570,557 | $ | 21.12 | |||||
Available for future issuance at December 31, 2002 |
16,064,928 | |||||||
Financial data pertaining to outstanding stock options were as follows:
December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted Average |
|||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Number of | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||
Ranges of | Number of | Remaining | Exercise Price of | Exercisable | of Exercisable | |||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Option Shares | Years | Option Shares | Option Shares | Option Shares | |||||||||||||||
$4.86 - $9.59 |
1,012,756 | 1.2 | $ 6.99 | 1,012,756 | $ | 6.99 | ||||||||||||||
10.28 - 14.81 |
3,253,428 | 3.1 | 10.75 | 3,253,428 | 10.75 | |||||||||||||||
15.24 - 19.92 |
5,541,982 | 6.3 | 16.60 | 1,882,994 | 17.08 | |||||||||||||||
20.02 - 23.41 |
6,115,923 | 5.6 | 22.46 | 5,983,623 | 22.49 | |||||||||||||||
24.01 - 24.99 |
3,996,332 | 8.0 | 24.05 | 134,681 | 24.27 | |||||||||||||||
25.20 - 25.81 |
3,927,715 | 8.9 | 25.34 | 159,135 | 25.52 | |||||||||||||||
26.01 - 33.54 |
4,722,421 | 9.8 | 28.86 | 98,780 | 26.21 | |||||||||||||||
28,570,557 | 6.8 | $ 21.12 | 12,525,397 | $ | 17.46 | |||||||||||||||
The Committee may also award restricted shares of common stock to officers and key employees. The terms of the grants are determined by the Committee at the date of the award. As of December 31, 2002, no awards of restricted shares of common stock had been made.
NOTE 17. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair values of financial instruments have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable and Advance Payments by Borrowers for Taxes and Insurance-The carrying amount as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Mortgage-Backed and Investment Securities-Fair values are based on quoted market prices, dealer quotes and prices obtained from independent pricing services.
Loans and Leases-At December 31, 2002, the fair value of loans and leases, other than one-to-four family loans, is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the LIBOR swap curve. The fair value of one-to-four family loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current market rates for loans of similar maturities, along with the LIBOR swap curve. At December 31, 2001, the fair value was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current market rates for loans and leases of similar maturities with adjustments for market and credit risks.
FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank Stock-The fair value is estimated to be the carrying value which is par. All transactions in the capital stock of the FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank are executed at par.
Deposits-At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and money market deposit accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. At December 31, 2002, the fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the LIBOR swap curve. At December 31, 2001, the fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit was estimated using rates currently offered for advances of similar remaining maturities.
FHLB Advances, Federal Funds Purchased and Repurchase Agreements and Other Borrowings-At December 31, 2002, the fair value of convertible FHLB advances is provided by the FHLB. The fair value of federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements and other borrowings is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the LIBOR swap curve. At December 31, 2001, rates available to the Bank for borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities were used to estimate the fair value of existing borrowings.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 53
Forward CommitmentsQuoted market prices are utilized to determine fair value disclosures when such prices are available.
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2002 and 2001. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Value | Value | Value | Value | ||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
$ | 447,213 | $ | 447,213 | $ | 516,520 | $ | 516,520 | ||||||||||
Investment securities |
214,068 | 214,371 | 135,586 | 135,779 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
12,077,389 | 12,101,680 | 9,014,416 | 9,053,170 | ||||||||||||||
Loans and leases, net |
26,204,738 | 27,587,274 | 25,728,700 | 26,102,123 | ||||||||||||||
FHLB and Federal Reserve
Bank stock |
681,923 | 681,923 | 617,836 | 617,836 | ||||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
154,962 | 154,962 | 162,065 | 162,065 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||
Checking, money market
and savings accounts |
17,807,967 | 17,807,967 | 14,567,186 | 14,567,186 | ||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
9,719,876 | 9,907,256 | 10,556,123 | 10,695,580 | ||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
9,037,925 | 9,658,562 | 8,657,238 | 9,017,975 | ||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and
repurchase agreements |
283,912 | 283,912 | 203,259 | 203,259 | ||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
708,853 | 826,665 | 304,410 | 323,957 | ||||||||||||||
Advance payments by
borrowers for taxes
and insurance |
23,595 | 23,595 | 54,103 | 54,103 | ||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
38,372 | 38,372 | 57,704 | 57,704 | ||||||||||||||
Off-Balance-Sheet Items: |
||||||||||||||||||
Forward commitments to
purchase/sell/originate loans
or mortgage-backed securities |
2,855 | 4,397 |
NOTE 18. PARENT COMPANY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The summarized financial statements of Charter One (parent company only) as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for the three years ended December 31, 2002 are as follows:
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
December 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
Assets: |
|||||||||||
Deposits with subsidiaries |
$ | 29,484 | $ | 55,043 | |||||||
Cash equivalents |
4,295 | 138 | |||||||||
Investments in and receivables due
from subsidiaries |
3,139,533 | 2,401,473 | |||||||||
Securities and other assets |
12,527 | 570,318 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 3,185,839 | $ | 3,026,972 | |||||||
Liabilities: |
|||||||||||
Other borrowings |
$ | 94,781 | $ | 94,524 | |||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
7,233 | 3,948 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
102,014 | 98,472 | |||||||||
Shareholders Equity: |
|||||||||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital |
2,195,371 | 2,094,016 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
824,564 | 811,093 | |||||||||
Treasury stock, at cost |
(82,610 | ) | (14,586 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
146,500 | 37,977 | |||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
3,083,825 | 2,928,500 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 3,185,839 | $ | 3,026,972 | |||||||
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
Income: |
||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiaries |
$ | 625,000 | $ | 407,300 | $ | 1,022,400 | ||||||||
Interest and dividends on securities |
20,148 | 39,382 | 17,914 | |||||||||||
Other income |
1,467 | 1,064 | 1,238 | |||||||||||
Total income |
646,615 | 447,746 | 1,041,552 | |||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
7,034 | 7,015 | 7,022 | |||||||||||
Administrative expenses |
6,568 | 6,566 | 5,663 | |||||||||||
Total expenses |
13,602 | 13,581 | 12,685 | |||||||||||
Income before undistributed
income of subsidiaries |
633,013 | 434,165 | 1,028,867 | |||||||||||
Equity in undistributed
income (losses) of subsidiaries |
(55,345 | ) | 66,549 | (594,905 | ) | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 500,714 | $ | 433,962 | ||||||||
54 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 577,668 | $ | 500,714 | $ | 433,962 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|||||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed
(earnings) losses of subsidiaries |
55,345 | (66,549 | ) | 594,905 | |||||||||||
Other |
(701,989 | ) | (470,851 | ) | (704,580 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities |
(68,976 | ) | (36,686 | ) | 324,287 | ||||||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|||||||||||||||
Payments for investments in
and advances to subsidiaries |
(332,732 | ) | (116,713 | ) | (553,800 | ) | |||||||||
Repayment of investments in
and advances to subsidiaries |
916,805 | 368,000 | 719,400 | ||||||||||||
Purchases of securities |
(5,633 | ) | (1,000 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by
investing activities |
578,440 | 250,287 | 165,600 | ||||||||||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock |
58,569 | 49,443 | 30,209 | ||||||||||||
Payment of dividends on
common stock |
(191,070 | ) | (167,052 | ) | (144,659 | ) | |||||||||
Net purchases of treasury stock |
(398,365 | ) | (122,597 | ) | (293,763 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash used in financing
activities |
(530,866 | ) | (240,206 | ) | (408,213 | ) | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in deposits
with subsidiaries and cash
equivalents |
$ | (21,402 | ) | $ | (26,605 | ) | $ | 81,674 | |||||||
NOTE 19. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On January 16, 2003, the Boards of Directors of the Company and Advance Bancorp, Inc. announced a definitive agreement pursuant to which the Company will acquire Advance Bancorp for $72 million in Charter One common stock. Advance Bank, the principal subsidiary of Advance Bancorp, is a state-chartered commercial bank headquartered in Lansing, Illinois with approximately $632 million in assets, $491 million in deposits, and 14 branch offices located in Cook County, Illinois. The merger, which will be accounted for as a purchase, is expected to close in the second or third quarter of 2003. The transaction is subject to required bank regulatory approvals and approval by Advance Bancorp shareholders.
independent AUDITORS REPORT
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Charter One Financial, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Charter One Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Charter One Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
January 17, 2003
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 55
report of MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL PURSUANT
TO SECTION 36 OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT
January 17, 2003
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The management of Charter One Bank, N.A. (the Bank) is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of its published financial statements and all other information presented in this annual report. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, as such, include amounts based on informed judgments, assumptions and estimates made by management.
INTERNAL CONTROL
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting for financial presentations in conformity with both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Instructions for Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report instructions). The internal control contains monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct deficiencies identified.
There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.
Management assessed the Banks internal control over financial reporting for financial presentations in conformity with both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and Call Report instructions as of December 31, 2002. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management believes that the Bank maintained effective internal control over financial reporting presented in conformity with both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and Call Report instructions as of December 31, 2002.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is comprised entirely of outside directors who are independent of the Banks management; it includes members with banking or related management experience, has access to its own outside counsel, and does not include any large customers of the Bank. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the independent auditors for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work. It meets periodically with management, the independent auditors, and the internal auditors to ensure that they are carrying out their responsibilities. The Audit Committee is also responsible for performing an oversight role by reviewing and monitoring the financial, accounting and auditing procedures of the Bank in addition to reviewing the Banks financial reports. The independent auditors and the internal auditors have full and free access to the Audit Committee, with or without the presence of management, to discuss the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting and any other matters which they believe should be brought to the attention of the Audit Committee.
COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Management is also responsible for ensuring compliance with the federal laws and regulations concerning loans to insiders and the federal and state laws and regulations concerning dividend restrictions, both of which are designated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as safety and soundness laws and regulations.
Management assessed its compliance with the designated safety and soundness laws and regulations and has maintained records of its determinations and assessments as required by the FDIC. Based on this assessment, management believes that the Bank has complied, in all material respects, with the designated safety and soundness laws and regulations for the year ended December 31, 2002.
/s/ Charles John Koch | /s/ Richard W. Neu | |
Charles John Koch | Richard W. Neu | |
Chairman of the Board, | Executive Vice President and | |
President and | Chief Financial Officer | |
Chief Executive Officer |
56 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
independent AUDITORS REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 36 OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
Charter One Bank, N.A.
Cleveland, Ohio
We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Pursuant to Section 36 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, that Charter One Bank, N.A. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting for financial presentations in conformity with both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Instructions for Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report instructions) as of December 31, 2002 based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO report). Management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.
Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, testing, and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of the internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the internal control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assertion that Charter One Bank, N.A. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting for financial presentations in conformity with both accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the Call Report instructions as of December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in the COSO report.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
January 17, 2003
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 57
form 10-K
This Annual Report includes the information required in our Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The integration of the two documents gives our shareholders and other interested parties timely, efficient and comprehensive information on our financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. Portions of this Annual Report are not required by the Form 10-K report and are not filed as part of the Companys Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Only those portions of this Annual Report referenced in the cross reference index are incorporated in the Form 10-K filed with the SEC. The report has not been approved or disapproved by the SEC, nor has the SEC passed upon its accuracy or adequacy.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-K
þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 001-15495
CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC.
Delaware | 34-1567092 | |
|
||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1215 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio | 44114 | |
|
||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(Registrants telephone number,
including area code): (216) 566-5300
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock ($0.01 par value), including related preferred stock purchase rights |
New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
||
(Title of Each Class) | (Name of Each Exchange on which Registered) |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ No o
As of June 30, 2002, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting
common equity held by non-affiliates, computed
by reference to the closing sale price of $32.74 per common share as of that
date, was $7,570,169,949.
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrants sole class of common stock as of February 21, 2003 was 225,079,463.
Portions of the Registrants proxy statement for the April 22, 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III.
58 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
Form 10-K Cross Reference Index
Item | ||||
Number | Pages | |||
PART I | ||||
1. | Business | 59-60 | ||
2. | Properties | 60-61 | ||
3. | Legal Proceedings | 61 | ||
4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders Not Applicable | |||
PART II | ||||
5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters | 30 | ||
6. | Selected Financial Data | 16-17 | ||
7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 18-32 | ||
7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk | 28-29 | ||
8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 33-56 | ||
9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures Not Applicable | |||
PART III | ||||
10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant Note (1) | |||
11. | Executive Compensation Note (1) | |||
12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters Note (1)(2) | |||
13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Note (1) | |||
14. | Controls and Procedures | 61 | ||
PART IV | ||||
15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K | 33-58 | ||
Signatures | 61 | |||
Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | 62-63 |
Exhibits The index of exhibits has been filed as separate pages of the 2002 Form 10-K and is available to shareholders on request from the Registrants Investor Relations Department. Copies of the exhibits may be obtained at a cost of 30 cents per page.
Financial Statement Schedules All financial statement schedules are omitted because the required information is not applicable or is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or related notes.
Reports on Form 8-K On October 8, 2002, the Registrant filed a report on Form 8-K containing a press release announcing earnings expectations for the third quarter of 2002.
Note (1): Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Proxy Statement for the April 22, 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. None of the foregoing incorporation by reference shall include the information referred to in Item 306 or Item 402(a)(8) of Regulation S-K.
Note (2): See Note 16 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information relating to the Companys equity compensation plans.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 59
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, Charter One Financial, Inc., hereafter referred to as Charter One or the Company, is a financial holding company. Charter Ones principal line of business is consumer banking which is primarily conducted through the operations of Charter One Bank, N.A. and its subsidiaries. The executive offices of Charter One are located at 1215 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, and the telephone number is (216) 566-5300. See Selected Financial Data under Part II, Item 6, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7 and Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information relating to Charter Ones business.
Charter One has a long history of completing mergers and acquisitions, which have had a significant effect on its business. See Note 3 and 19 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the impact of recent business combinations and branch acquisitions.
Our reports, proxy statements and other information we file with the SEC, as well our news releases, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Corporate Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Audit Committee Charter, Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee Charter and Compensation Committee Charter, are available free of charge through our Internet site at http://www.charterone.com. This information can be found on the Investor Relations page of our Internet site. Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act are available as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with the SEC. Reference to our Internet address is not intended to incorporate any of the information contained on our Internet site into this document.
MARKET AREA AND COMPETITION
As of December 31, 2002, Charter One was ranked the 21st largest bank holding company in the country and operated through numerous banking offices: 112 in Ohio, 104 in Michigan, 128 in New York, 81 in Illinois, 26 in Vermont and 10 in Massachusetts. The branch locations operate under the Charter One Bank name in all areas.
Based on 2002 data from SNL Datasource, the counties served by the Bank include approximately 36% of the population of Ohio, 54% of Michigan, 52% of New York (excluding New York City), 65% of Illinois, 80% of Vermont and 10% of Massachusetts.
The consumer banking business is highly competitive. Charter One competes actively in all aspects and areas of its business with consumer and commercial banks, savings and loans, mortgage bankers and other financial service entities. Charter One also competes with non-financial institutions, including retail stores that maintain their own credit programs and governmental agencies that make available low cost or guaranteed loans to certain borrowers.
REGULATION
As a financial holding company, Charter One is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Board. Charter One is required to file reports with the Federal Reserve Board and is subject to regular inspections by that agency. Financial holding companies may engage in a broad array of banking, insurance and securities activities. The insurance activities include both underwriting and agency activities, as well as title insurance activities, and are generally subject to state law licensing requirements. However, state anti-affiliation laws have been generally preempted. The securities activities include both underwriting and agency activities. Aside from activities expressly permitted under the Gramm Leach-Bliley Act, financial holding companies may engage in activities which the Federal Reserve Board in consultation with, and with the non-objection of, the U.S. Treasury Department, determines to be (i) financial in nature or (ii) incidental to a financial activity, or activities which the Federal Reserve Board determines on its own to be complementary to a financial activity without posing a substantial risk to the safety and soundness of the depository institution or the financial system generally. With the exception of our minor real estate development activities, the list of permissible activities includes all current operations of Charter One. We intend to comply with the Federal Reserve Boards divestiture orders with respect to these real estate development activities, the time period for which may be extended under the law.
On January 7, 2002, Charter One Bank filed an application with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to convert from a thrift to a national bank. The conversion was effective May 7, 2002 and resulted in changing the Banks name to Charter One Bank, N.A. from Charter One Bank, F.S.B. As a national bank, Charter One Bank is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by its primary regulator, the OCC, as well as the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis Capital and Dividends under Part II, Item 7 of this Form 10-K, and Note 14 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, for a discussion of the regulatory capital calculations and compliance with regulatory capital requirements as well as regulatory restrictions on cash dividends.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act On July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the SOA). The stated goals of the SOA are to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws.
The SOA is the most far-reaching U.S. securities legislation enacted in some time. The SOA generally applies to all companies, both U.S. and non-U.S., that file or are required to file periodic reports with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act (the Act). Given the extensive SEC role in implementing rules relating to many of the SOAs new requirements, the final scope of many of these requirements remains to be determined.
60 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
The SOA includes very specific additional disclosure requirements and new corporate governance rules, requires the SEC and securities exchanges to adopt extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related rules and mandates further studies of certain issues by the SEC and the Comptroller General. The SOA represents significant federal involvement in matters traditionally left to state regulatory systems, such as the regulation of the accounting profession, and to state corporate law, such as the relationship between a board of directors and management and between a board of directors and its committees.
The SOA addresses, among other matters:
| audit committees; | ||
| certification of financial statements by the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer; | ||
| the forfeiture of bonuses or other incentive-based compensation and profits from the sale of an issuers securities by directors and senior officers in the 12 month period following initial publication of any financial statements that later require restatement; | ||
| a prohibition on the sale of stock by directors and executives during pension plan black out periods; | ||
| disclosure of off-balance sheet transactions; | ||
| a prohibition on certain personal loans to directors and officers; | ||
| disclosure of a code of ethics and filing a Form 8-K for a change or waiver of such code; | ||
| real time filing of periodic reports; expedited filing requirements for Form 4s; | ||
| the formation of a public company accounting oversight board; | ||
| auditor independence; and | ||
| various increased criminal penalties for violations of securities laws. |
The SOA contains provisions which became effective upon enactment on July 30, 2002 and provisions which become effective from within 30 days to one year from enactment. The SEC has been delegated the task of adopting rules to implement various provisions of the SOA.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Executive Officers of the RegistrantThe executive officers of Charter One, each of whom is currently an executive officer of Charter One Bank, are identified below. The executive officers of Charter One are elected annually by its Board of Directors to serve until the next annual election of officers following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Age at | Officer | |||||||||
Name | December 31, 2002 | Position | Since | |||||||
Charles John Koch | 56 | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer | 1987 | |||||||
Mark D. Grossi | 49 | Executive Vice President | 1992 | |||||||
John David Koch | 50 | Executive Vice President | 1987 | |||||||
Richard W. Neu | 46 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 1995 | |||||||
Robert J. Vana | 53 | Senior Vice President, Chief Corporate Counsel and Corporate Secretary | 1987 |
Charles John Koch has been President of Charter One Bank since 1980 and was Chief Operating Officer of Charter One from 1980 to 1988, when he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Charter One. In February 1995, he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Charter One and of Charter One Bank. Mr. Koch is the brother of John David Koch.
Mark D. Grossi is an Executive Vice President of Charter One and of Charter One Bank, and has been responsible for retail banking and branch administration since Charter Ones merger with First American Savings Bank in 1992.
John David Koch joined Charter One Bank in 1982 and is Executive Vice President of Charter One and of Charter One Bank. Mr. Koch is responsible for the credit and lending functions of Charter One Bank and has management responsibility for numerous subsidiary corporations. Mr. Koch is the brother of Charles John Koch.
Richard W. Neu is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Charter One and Charter One Bank. He joined Charter One in 1995 following Charter Ones merger with FirstFed Michigan Corporation. Prior to the merger he had served as FirstFeds Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Robert J. Vana has been Chief Corporate Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Charter One since 1988 and joined Charter One Bank as Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary in 1982.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The executive offices of Charter One and Charter One Bank are located at 1215 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio in a seven-story office building owned by Charter One. Charter One Bank also maintains an operations center in a single-story building and a service center in a two-story building owned by the Bank and located in Cleveland, Ohio. The Bank owns various other office buildings including two four-story office buildings in Rochester, New York; a two-story and three-story office building in Albany, New York; a nine-story office building in Toledo, Ohio; a four-story office building in downtown Canton, Ohio; a three-story office building in Akron, Ohio; three two-story office buildings in Detroit, Michigan and six two-story office buildings, three three-story office buildings and a four-story office building in metropolitan Chicago, Illinois. Most buildings include space for a branch office and various divisional administrative functions, with any remaining space leased to tenants.
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 61
As of December 31, 2002, in addition to the Banks 461 banking locations, Charter One Bank and its subsidiaries operated 26 loan production offices in 11 states. At December 31, 2002, Charter One Bank owned 258 of these banking locations and leased the remainder. We operate 913 ATMs at various banking offices and are a member of Star Systems (STAR), which provides our customers access to ATMs nationwide. The lease terms for branch offices are not individually material. Lease terms range from monthly to 20 years.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Charter One and its subsidiaries are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various actions incident to their business, none of which is believed to be material to the financial condition of Charter One.
In 2002, Charter One filed stipulations of dismissal regarding five claims asserted in previously disclosed court cases related to its supervisory goodwill litigation, which have been outstanding since 1995. As outlined in previous SEC filings on Form 10-K, Charter One and various predecessors had asserted five separate claims against the United States of America for breach of certain agreements involving supervisory goodwill and capital credits. Based on the outcome of similar cases and related damages, Charter One has determined that the cost of further litigation of the five dismissed claims would likely exceed the potential benefits.
ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
An evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Section 13(a)-14(c) of the Act) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Companys senior management within the 90-day period preceding the filing date of this annual report. The Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as currently in effect are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Companys management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Since the date of this evaluation there have been no significant changes in, or corrective actions taken regarding, the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls.
The Company intends to continually review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures and to improve its controls and procedures over time and to correct any deficiencies that it may discover in the future. The goal is to ensure that senior management has timely access to all material financial and non-financial information concerning the Companys business. While the Company believes the present design of its disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve its goal, future events affecting its business may cause the Company to modify its disclosure controls and procedures.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Cleveland, State of Ohio, as of March 14, 2003.
CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC.
By: Charles John Koch
Director, Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and as of the date indicated above.
Charles John Koch
(Principal Executive Officer)
Director, Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Richard W. Neu
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Patrick J. Agnew, Director
Herbert G. Chorbajian, Director
Phillip Wm. Fisher, Director
Denise Marie Fugo, Director
Mark D. Grossi, Director, Executive Vice President
Karen R. Hitchcock, Director
John D. Koch, Director, Executive Vice President
Barbara J. Mahone, Director
Michael P. Morley, Director
Ronald F. Poe, Director
Victor A. Ptak, Director
Melvin J. Rachal, Director
Jerome L. Schostak, Director
Joseph C. Scully, Director
Mark Shaevsky, Director
Leonard S. Simon, Director
John P. Tierney, Director
62 THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT
certifications OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Charles John Koch, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Charter One Financial, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls; and |
6. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 14, 2003
/s/ Charles John Koch
Charles John Koch
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
THE CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. ANNUAL REPORT 63
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Richard W. Neu, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Charter One Financial, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have:
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; | ||
b) | evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) | presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) | all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls; and |
6. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: March 14, 2003
/s/ Richard W. Neu
Richard W. Neu
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC., CORPORATE DIRECTORY
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Charles John Koch
Patrick J. Agnew
Herbert G. Chorbajian
Philip Wm. Fisher
Denise Marie Fugo
Mark D. Grossi
Karen R. Hitchcock, Ph.D.
John D. Koch
Barbara J. Mahone
Michael P. Morley
Richard W. Neu |
Ronald F. Poe President, Ronald F. Poe & Associates White Plains, New York
Victor A. Ptak
Melvin J. Rachal
Jerome L. Schostak
Joseph C. Scully
Mark Shaevsky
Leonard S. Simon
John P. Tierney
|
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Direct Mailing of Annual Report
Dividend Policy and
Stock Trading Information
Transfer Agent
Directors Emeriti
|
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Investor Relations
Corporate Marketing
Independent Auditors
Legal Counsel: Internal
Legal Counsel: External
Legal Counsel: External
Headquarters
|
[CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC.® LOGO]
www.charterone.com
CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. | 1215 SUPERIOR AVENUE | CLEVELAND, OHIO 44114
338-AR-03
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT | ||
NUMBER | DESCRIPTION | |
3.1 | Registrants Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended and currently in effect, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 001-15495), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
3.2 | Registrants Bylaws, as amended and restated and currently in effect, filed as Exhibit 3.2 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 001-15495), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
4.1 | Form of Certificate of Common Stock, as currently in effect, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 001-15495), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
4.2 | Amended and Restated Stockholder Protection Rights Agreement, dated October 20, 1999, between the Company and Fleet National Bank (f/k/a BankBoston, N.A.), as rights agent, filed as Exhibit 2 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed on October 30, 1999 (File No. 001-15495), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
4.3 | The Registrant hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, with copies of all instruments defining rights of holders of long-term debt of Charter One and its consolidated subsidiaries. | |
10.1 | Registrants Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, filed on January 22, 1988 as Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-16207), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.2 | Registrants Directors Stock Option Plan, filed on January 22, 1988 as Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-16207), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.3 | Charter One Bank, F.S.B. Executive Incentive Goal Achievement Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994 (File No. 000-16311) is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.4 | First American Savings Bank, F.S.B. Nonqualified Retirement Plan and First Amendment thereto, filed as Exhibit 10.17 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 (File No. 000-16311), are incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.5 | FirstFed Michigan Corporation 1991 Stock Option Plan, filed on November 1, 1995 as an exhibit to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-61273), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.6 | Amendment 1, dated May 3, 1996, to Forms of Supplemental Retirement Agreements, dated October 31, 1995, between Charter One and Charles John Koch, Richard W. Neu, John David Koch, Mark D. Grossi, and Robert J. Vana filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-16311), is incorporated herein by reference. The Agreements, originally filed on July 25, 1995 as Exhibits 10.4 and 10.5 to Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 33-61273), are incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.7 | Amended and Restated Employment Agreements, effective August 1, 1999, between Charter One Financial, Inc. and Charles John Koch, Richard W. Neu, John D. Koch, Mark D. Grossi, and Robert J. Vana filed as Exhibit 10.8 to Registrants Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 000-16311), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.8 | Alliance Bancorp 1997 Long-Term Incentive Stock Benefit Plan, filed as an attachment to the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of Alliance held on May 28, 1997 (File No. 000-20082), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.9 | Hinsdale Financial Corporation 1994 Incentive Stock Option Plan, filed as an attachment to the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of Alliance held on February 8, 1995 (File No. 000-20082), is incorporated herein by reference. |
EXHIBIT | ||
NUMBER | DESCRIPTION | |
10.10 | Hinsdale Financial Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors and the Hinsdale Financial Corporation 1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan, filed as attachments to the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of Alliance held on February 10, 1993 (File No. 000-20082) is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.11 | Charter One Financial, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 (File No. 001-15495), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.12 | 1992 Stock-Based Compensation Plan of RCSB Financial, Inc., filed on October 8, 1997, as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment Number One on Form S-8 to Form S-4 (File No. 333-33259), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.13 | Home Federal Savings Bank Stock Compensation Program, filed on September 29, 1997 as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment Number One on Form S-8 to Form S-4 (File No. 333-33169), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.14 | The RCSB Financial, Inc. Non-Employee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated on December 1, 1998, filed as Exhibit 10.16 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-16311), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.15 | ALBANK Financial Corporation 1992 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees, as amended and restated as of December 18, 1995, filed as Exhibit 10.11 to ALBANKs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 (File No. 000-19843), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.16 | ALBANK Financial Corporation 1995 Stock Incentive Plan for Outside Directors, filed as Exhibit 10.12.1 to ALBANKs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 (File No. 000-19843), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.17 | ALBANK Financial Corporation 1992 Stock Incentive Plan for Outside Directors, filed as an appendix to the Proxy Statement for the 1992 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of ALBANK held on October 26, 1992 (File No. 001-19843), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.18 | Employment Agreement, dated November 30, 1998, between Charter One Financial, Inc. and Herbert G. Chorbajian, filed as Exhibit 10.20 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 000-16311), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.19 | Charter One Financial, Inc. Top Executive Incentive Goal Achievement Plan, filed on October 1, 1998 as Annex E to the Prospectus contained in the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-65137), is incorporated herein by reference. | |
10.20 | Charter One Bank, N.A.s Director Non-Stock Deferred Compensation Plan. | |
10.21 | Charter One Bank, N.A.s Non-Stock Deferred Compensation Plan. | |
10.22 | Charter One Bank, N.A.s Stock Deferred Compensation Plan. | |
10.23 | Master Trust Agreement for Charter One Financial, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plans. | |
10.24 | Amendment No. 1 to the amended and restated Charter One Financial, Inc. 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. | |
11 | Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings | |
21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant | |
23 | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP | |
99.1 | Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Item 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |