CB BANCSHARES INC/HI - 10-Q Quarterly Report

Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 0-12396

CB BANCSHARES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Hawaii		99-0197163
(State of Incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

201 Merchant Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
(Address of principal executive offices)

(808) 535-2500
(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes [X]		No [ ]

The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of October 31, 2003 was:


Class		Outstanding

Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value		4,315,057 shares

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements
		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
		CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings
	Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
	Item 5. Other Information
	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 10.1
EXHIBIT 10.2
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1
EXHIBIT 32.2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
CB BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


		September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(in thousands)		2003			2002			2002

Assets
Cash and due from banks		$	45,762		$	75,069		$	34,959
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks			1,058			1,214			1,040
Federal funds sold			1,500			20,525			750
Investment securities:
	Held-to-maturity		164,529			112,013			111,806
	Available-for-sale		309,470			228,335			242,314
	FHLB stock		31,184			29,886			29,388
Loans held for sale			82,767			98,568			47,792
Loans, net			1,130,724			1,035,272			1,048,214
Premises and equipment			16,117			16,596			17,155
Other real estate owned			707			2,193			1,431
Accrued interest receivable and other assets			59,140			54,687			53,346

Total assets			1,842,958			1,674,358			1,588,195

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Deposits:
	Noninterest-bearing	$	203,307		$	212,140		$	164,153
	Interest-bearing		978,288			951,087			969,145

Total Deposits			1,181,595			1,163,227			1,133,298

Short-term borrowings			204,400			10,400			45,400
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			26,755			27,595			26,623
Long-term debt			264,394			319,407			229,411
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary			2,720			2,720			2,720

Total liabilities			1,679,864			1,523,349			1,437,452

Stockholders’ equity:
	Common stock		4,315			3,898			3,975
	Additional paid-in capital		102,480			78,311			81,261
	Retained earnings		51,231			63,679			60,503
	Unreleased shares to employee stock ownership plan		(1,364	)		(1,486	)		(1,712	)
	Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax		6,432			6,607			6,716

Total stockholders’ equity			163,094			151,009			150,743

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	1,842,958		$	1,674,358		$	1,588,195

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
CB BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


			Quarter Ended					Nine Months Ended
			September 30,					September 30,
(in thousands, except per share data)			2003		2002			2003		2002

Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans			$	21,728	$	21,967		$	63,689	$	68,373
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
		Taxable interest income		3,481		3,556			9,865		9,720
		Nontaxable interest income		386		390			1,160		1,167
		Dividends		406		499			1,300		1,472
Other interest income				8		68			227		102

		Total interest income		26,009		26,480			76,241		80,834

Interest expense:
Deposits				2,516		4,356			8,918		14,109
Short-term borrowings				365		68			486		551
Long-term debt				2,709		2,833			8,902		8,474

		Total interest expense		5,590		7,257			18,306		23,134

		Net interest income		20,419		19,223			57,935		57,700
Provision for credit losses				1,150		3,989			6,030		12,959

		Net interest income after provision for credit losses		19,269		15,234			51,905		44,741

Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts				1,175		1,093			3,417		3,190
Other service charges and fees				1,890		1,895			5,369		5,069
Net realized gains (losses) on sales of securities				800		(1,515	)		1,007		(1,619	)
Net gains on sales of loans				231		696			1,962		1,415
Impairment on asset-backed securities				—		(1,399	)		—		(1,399	)
Item processing fee income				455		101			1,382		299
Other				472		718			3,861		2,353

		Total noninterest income		5,023		1,589			16,998		9,308

Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits				7,299		6,501			21,862		19,571
Net occupancy expense				1,684		1,627			4,971		4,767
Equipment expense				578		625			1,771		2,185
Unsolicited hostile takeover proposal expenses				1,929		—			6,151		—
Other				4,508		4,092			13,602		12,991

		Total noninterest expense		15,998		12,845			48,357		39,514

		Income before income taxes		8,294		3,978			20,546		14,535
Income tax expense				2,750		1,257			6,670		4,657

		Net income	$	5,544	$	2,721		$	13,876	$	9,878

Per share data:
	Basic		$	1.29	$	0.63		$	3.25	$	2.32
	Diluted		$	1.25	$	0.62		$	3.16	$	2.28

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
CB BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


			Nine Months Ended
			September 30,
(in thousands)			2003			2002

Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net income		$	13,876		$	9,878
	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
		Provision for credit losses		6,030			12,959
		Net realized loss (gains) on sale of loans, investment and mortgage-backed securities		(2,969	)		204
		Depreciation and amortization		3,688			2,724
		Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable		(3,473	)		310
		Decrease in accrued interest payable		(341	)		(249	)
		Loans originated for sale		(371,975	)		(143,032	)
		Sale of loans held for sale		156,789			147,316
		Impairment on asset-backed securities		—			1,399
		Increase in other assets		(980	)		(9,437	)
		Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		(499	)		3,263
		Other		(1,656	)		(1,303	)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities				(201,510	)		24,032

Cash flows from investing activities:
	Net increase (decrease) in deposits in other banks			156			(23	)
	Net decrease in federal funds sold			19,025			9,905
	Purchase of held-to-maturity securities			(163,978	)		(106,354	)
	Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity investment securities			109,844			20,420
	Purchase of available-for-sale securities			(94,074	)		(105,918	)
	Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities			167,790			42,381
	Proceeds from sales of FHLB stock			—			4,489
	Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities			64,599			30,257
	Net decrease (increase) in loans			(88,215	)		109,605
	Capital expenditures			(1,487	)		(1,835	)
	Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets			2,863			5,114

Net cash provided by investing activities				16,523			8,041

Cash flows from financing activities:
	Net increase (decrease) in deposits			18,368			(5,137	)
	Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings			194,000			(30,700	)
	Proceeds from long-term debt			—			40,000
	Principal payments on long-term debt			(55,013	)		(25,013	)
	Cash dividends paid			(2,455	)		(1,221	)
	Options exercised			766			4,455
	Cash in lieu payments on stock dividend			(97	)		(58	)
	Stock repurchase			(12	)		(1,962	)
	Unreleased ESOP shares			122			127

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities				155,679			(19,509	)

Increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks				(29,307	)		12,564
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period				75,069			22,395

Cash and due from banks at end of period			$	45,762		$	34,959

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities:
	Interest paid on deposits and other borrowings		$	18,647		$	23,384
	Income taxes paid		$	5,156		$	3,400
	Securitization of mortgage loans into mortgage-backed securities classified as available-for-sale		$	218,722		$	—
	Loans transferred to other real estate owned		$	960		$	2,039

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
CB BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


												Unreleased
												Shares to			Accumulated
												Employee			Other
						Additional						Stock			Compre-
				Common		Paid-In			Retained			Ownership			hensive
(in thousands, except per share data)				Stock		Capital			Earnings			Plan			Income			Total

Balance at January 1, 2003					3,898	$	78,311		$	63,679		$	(1,486	)	$	6,607		$	151,009
Comprehensive income
	Net income				—		—			13,876			—			—			13,876
	Other comprehensive income, net of tax
		Unrealized gains on securities, net of reclassification adjustment			—		—			—			—			(175	)		(175	)

			Comprehensive income subtotal		—		—			13,876			—			(175	)		13,701

Cash dividends ($0.59 per share)					—		—			(2,455	)		—			—			(2,455	)
Options exercised					26		740			—			—			—			766
Stock dividend, including cash in lieu of fractional shares					391		23,381			(23,869	)		—			—			(97	)
Repurchased, cancelled and retired shares					—		(12	)		—			—			—			(12	)
ESOP shares					—		60			—			122			—			182

Balance at September 30, 2003					4,315	$	102,480		$	51,231		$	(1,364	)	$	6,432		$	163,094


													Unreleased
													Shares to			Accumulated
													Employee			Other
							Additional						Stock			Compre-
				Common			Paid-In			Retained			Ownership			hensive
(in thousands, except per share data)				Stock			Capital			Earnings			Plan			Income		Total

Balance at January 1, 2002					3,506		$	65,427		$	65,714		$	(1,839	)	$	954	$	133,762
Comprehensive income
	Net income				—			—			9,878			—			—		9,878
	Other comprehensive income, net of tax
		Unrealized gains on securities, net of reclassification adjustment			—			—			—			—			5,762		5,762

			Comprehensive income subtotal		—			—			9,878			—			5,762		15,640

Cash dividends ($0.33 per share)					—			—			(1,221	)		—			—		(1,221	)
Options exercised					159			4,296			—			—			—		4,455
Stock dividend, including cash in lieu of fractional shares					362			13,448			(13,868	)		—			—		(58	)
Repurchased, cancelled and retired shares					(52	)		(1,910	)		—			—			—		(1,962	)
ESOP shares					—			—			—			127			—		127

Balance at September 30, 2002					3,975		$	81,261		$	60,503		$	(1,712	)	$	6,716	$	150,743

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
CB BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTE A – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CB Bancshares, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Company”): City Bank and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Bank”); Datatronix Financial Services, Inc.; and O.R.E., Inc. Significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Bank owns 50% of Pacific Access Mortgage, LLC, a mortgage brokerage company. The investment is accounted for using the equity method. The consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial results for the interim periods.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes normally included in financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain amounts in the consolidated financial statements for 2002 have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on the consolidated net income as previously reported.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 143. In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” which requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs would be capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset and depreciated over the life of the asset. The liability is accreted at the end of each period through charges to operating expense. If the obligation is settled for other than the carrying amount of the liability, the Company will recognize a gain or loss on settlement. The adoption of SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003 had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 146. In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities. The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or

disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 146 on January 1, 2003 had no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 148. In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123 “which amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. As allowed by SFAS No. 123 (as amended by SFAS No. 148), the Company has elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had previously completed the transition and had fully applied these new accounting standards to its 2003, 2002 and 2001 option grants:


			Nine months ended
			September 30,
(in thousands, except per share data)			2003			2002

Net income:
	As reported		$	13,876		$	9,878
	Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects			(378	)		(135	)

	Proforma		$	13,498		$	9,743

Earnings per share:
		Basic - as reported	$	3.25		$	2.32
		Basic - pro forma	$	3.17		$	2.29
		Diluted - as reported	$	3.16		$	2.28
		Diluted - pro forma	$	3.07		$	2.25

SFAS No. 149. In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” This Statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. Prospective application to the Company’s rate-lock commitments on loans held-for-sale is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 on July 1, 2003 had no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

SFAS No. 150. In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” which establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). SFAS 150 is effective for all financial

instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. At September 30, 2003, the Company had no financial instruments falling within the scope of SFAS No. 150.

FASB Interpretation No. 45. In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” This interpretation provides disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements for periods ending after December 15, 2002 about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The Company adopted the provisions of the Interpretation on January 1, 2003 with no effect on the Company’s historical consolidated financial statements.

FASB Interpretation No. 46. In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, an interpretation of ARB No. 51. This Interpretation addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities (VIEs) as defined. The Interpretation applies immediately to variable interests in VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and to variable interests in VIEs obtained after January 31, 2003. For variable interests in VIEs that an enterprise acquired before February 1, 2003, the Interpretation is applicable in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. At September 30, 2003, the Company had no significant variable interests in a variable interest entity requiring consolidation or disclosure in accordance with the Interpretation.

NOTE B – Loans

The loan portfolio consisted of the following at the dates indicated:


			September 30,		December 31,		September 30,
(in thousands)			2003		2002		2002

Commercial and financial			$	236,767	$	225,971	$	218,030
Real estate:
	Construction			89,599		52,538		45,653
	Commercial			298,343		210,512		187,090
	Residential			369,881		444,246		488,175
Installment and consumer				176,700		135,415		141,173

		Gross loans		1,171,290		1,068,682		1,080,121
Less:
	Unearned discount			2,046		1,683		1,051
	Net deferred loan fees			6,668		4,604		4,182
	Allowance for credit losses			31,852		27,123		26,674

		Loans, net	$	1,130,724	$	1,035,272	$	1,048,214

NOTE C – Segment Information

The Company’s business segments are organized around services and products provided. The segment data presented below was prepared on the same basis of accounting as the consolidated financial statements described in Note A. Intersegment income and expense are valued at prices comparable to those for unaffiliated companies.

The Company’s business segments are defined as Retail Banking, Wholesale Banking, Treasury and All Other. Retail Banking is made up of retail deposits, mortgage banking and consumer lending activities. Wholesale Banking consists of wholesale deposits, commercial real estate lending, corporate lending and the specialized lending functions of the Bank. The Treasury segment is responsible for managing the Company’s investment securities portfolio and borrowing. The All Other segment consists of the administrative support of the Bank, transactions of the Parent Company, CB Bancshares, Inc., and subsidiaries of the Parent Company and Bank.

Retail banking net interest income is made up of interest income from revolving real estate, residential real estate and consumer loans, partially offset by the interest expense on retail deposits. Wholesale banking net interest income is made up of interest income from commercial and industrial, real-estate construction, and commercial real estate loans, partially offset by the interest expense on wholesale deposits. Treasury net interest income is derived from the interest income on investment securities, partially offset by the interest expense on short- and long-term borrowings.

Intersegment net interest income is allocated based on the net funding needs of each segment and applying an interest credit or charge based on an internal cost of capital. Other operating income (expense) is the non-interest income and expense designated to Retail Banking, Wholesale Banking, Treasury, and All Other. Administrative overhead allocates the non-interest income (expense) from the All Other non-banking function segment to the other three segments, Retail Banking, Wholesale Banking and Treasury.

Assets are composed of cash, investments, loans, and fixed and other assets. Loan balances and any corresponding allowance for credit losses are allocated based on loan product types. Fixed assets are allocated by location and function within the Company.


(in thousands)	Retail			Wholesale			Treasury			All Other			Total

Nine months ended September 30, 2003
Net interest income	$	29,279		$	25,538		$	3,164		$	(46	)	$	57,935
Intersegment net interest income (expense)		275			(2,051	)		1,776			—			—
Provision for credit losses		563			5,467			—			—			6,030
Noninterest income (expense)		(4,757	)		(9,326	)		(498	)		(16,778	)		(31,359	)
Administrative and overhead expense allocation		(4,155	)		(3,397	)		(420	)		7,972			—
Income tax expense (benefit)		6,538			1,725			1,310			(2,903	)		6,670
Net income (loss)		13,541			3,572			2,712			(5,949	)		13,876
Total assets		652,572			575,625			557,264			57,497			1,842,958
Nine months ended September 30, 2002
Net interest income	$	32,214		$	22,112		$	3,437		$	(63	)	$	57,700
Intersegment net interest income (expense)		461			(2,447	)		1,986			—			—
Provision for credit losses		1,588			11,371			—			—			12,959
Noninterest income (expense)		(6,536	)		(8,486	)		(3,804	)		(11,380	)		(30,206	)
Administrative and overhead expense allocation		(5,280	)		(3,858	)		(568	)		9,706			—
Income tax expense (benefit)		6,118			(1,286	)		334			(509	)		4,657
Net income (loss)		13,153			(2,764	)		717			(1,228	)		9,878
Total assets		697,590			415,816			423,606			51,183			1,588,195

NOTE D – Earnings Per Share Calculation

Quarter ended September 30,

2003

2002

Shares

Per

Shares

Per

(in thousands, except number of shares

Income

(Denom-

Share

Income

(Denom-

Share

and per share data)

(Numerator)

inator)

Amount

(Numerator)

inator)

Amount

Basic:

Net income

5,544

4,273,109

1.29

2,721

4,303,516

0.63

Effect of dilutive securities - Stock incentive plan options

—

137,641

(0.04

)

—

44,903

(0.01

)

Diluted:

Net income and assumed conversions

5,544

4,410,750

1.25

2,721

4,348,419

0.62

Nine months ended September 30,

2003

2002

Shares

Per

Shares

Per

(in thousands, except number of shares

Income

(Denom-

Share

Income

(Denom-

Share

and per share data)

(Numerator)

inator)

Amount

(Numerator)

inator)

Amount

Basic:

Net income

13,876

4,264,671

3.25

9,878

4,262,972

2.32

Effect of dilutive securities - Stock incentive plan options

—

125,641

(0.09

)

—

71,317

(0.04

)

Diluted:

Net income and assumed conversions

13,876

4,390,312

3.16

9,878

4,334,289

2.28

Earnings per share calculations have been restated to reflect the impact of the 10% stock dividends issued in June 2003 and 2002.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains statements relating to future results of the Company (including certain projections and business trends) that are considered “forward-looking statements.” Actual results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, changes in political and economic conditions, interest rate fluctuations, competitive product and pricing pressures within the Company’s market, equity and bond market fluctuations, personal and corporate customers’ bankruptcies and financial condition, inflation and results of litigation. The unsolicited takeover proposal and costs related thereto could also have a material effect on future operating results. Accordingly, historical performance, as well as reasonably applied projections and assumptions, may not be a reliable indicator of future earnings due to risks and uncertainties. As circumstances, conditions or events change that affect the Company’s assumptions and projections on which any of the statements are based, the Company disclaims any obligation to issue any update or revision to any forward-looking statement contained herein.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to its investments, loans and allowance for loan losses, intangible assets, income taxes, contingencies, and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on current market conditions, historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Different results from these estimates may occur under different assumptions or conditions and actual results may differ. The Company believes the following critical accounting policies used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements require significant judgments and estimates.

Allowance for Credit Losses. The Company’s allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for credit losses is periodically evaluated for adequacy by management. Factors considered include the Company’s loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, known adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, regulatory policies, and the estimated value of underlying collateral. The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the above factors along with prevailing economic conditions that may impact borrowers’ ability to repay loans. Determination of the allowance is in part objective and in part a subjective judgment by management given the information it currently has in its possession. Adverse changes in any of these factors or the discovery of new adverse information could result in higher charge-offs and loan loss provisions.

The Allowance consists of allocated and unallocated allowances. The allocated allowances relates to specific allowances for individual loans, pooled graded loans and loan concentrations,

and homogeneous loans (e.g., consumer loans, residential mortgage loans). The Company has established and adopted a loan grading system in which loans are segregated by risk. Certain graded commercial and commercial real estate loans are analyzed on an individual basis based on performance and collateral. The allocated allowances also include a percentage factor for pooled graded loans and homogenous pools of loans taking into account the Bank’s historical losses as well as the present condition, expected performance of each pool and risks inherent in loan concentrations in certain industries or categories.

To mitigate imprecision in the estimates of expected credit losses, the allocated component of the allowance is supplemented by an unallocated component. The unallocated allowance is more judgmental and takes into consideration the risks inherent in the loan portfolio, estimation errors, and economic trends or uncertainties that are not necessarily captured in determining allocated allowances.

Impairment of Investments. The realization of the Company’s investment in certain mortgage/asset-backed securities and collateralized loan and bond obligations is dependent on the credit quality of the underlying borrowers and yields demanded by the marketplace. Increases in market interest rates and deteriorating credit quality of the underlying borrowers because of adverse conditions may result in additional impairment charges. The Company records an investment impairment charge when it believes an investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. Since the collateralized loan and bond obligations do not have a liquid trading market, management’s estimate of value is based upon estimates of future returns that may or may not actually be realized. Accordingly, under different assumptions, the value could be adversely affected.

Deferred Tax Assets. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that it believes is more likely than not to be realized. This requires an objective as well as a subjective judgment by management. While the Company has considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would increase income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

NET INCOME

Consolidated net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, totaled $5.5 million, an increase of $2.8 million, or 103.7%, over the same quarter last year. Consolidated net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, totaled $13.9 million, an increase of $4.0 million, or 40.5%, over the same period in 2002. Diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of 2003 was $1.25 as compared to $0.62 for the same period in 2002, an increase of $0.63, or 101.6%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, diluted earnings per share was $3.16, an increase of $0.88, or 38.6%, over the same period in 2002. The increase in consolidated net income for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, over the corresponding periods in 2002,

was primarily due to decreases in interest expense and the provision for credit losses and an increase in noninterest income, partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense.

The Company’s annualized return on average total assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was 1.09% as compared to 0.85% for the same period last year. The Company’s annualized return on average stockholders’ equity was 11.80% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to 9.26% for the same period last year.

Hawaii’s economy for the first three quarters of 2003 continued to show mixed results. During this time, there has been disruption in the travel industry due to the hostilities in the Middle East, while the Hawaii real estate and construction industry has seen growth. For the first nine months of 2003, total visitor days increased 3.8% from the same period in 2002; however, total visitor arrivals were down 1.0%, compared with the same period in 2002. The housing market improved, with residential home sales in Hawaii through the third quarter of 2003 totaling $2.5 billion, an increase of 37.7% over the same period last year. The median sales price for single-family homes and condominiums increased over the same period last year by 9.7% and 13.6%, respectively. The state’s unemployment rate was 4.3% and 4.1% in September 2003 and September 2002, respectively.

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, was $20.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $1.2 million, or 6.1%, over the same period in 2002. The increase was primarily due to a $193.7 million increase in interest-earning assets and a $157.0 million increase in interest-earning liabilities, partially offset by a 32 basis points decrease in the net interest margin (which decreased to 4.87%) as compared to the same quarter last year.

Net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, was $58.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $232,000, or 0.4%, over the same period in 2002. The slight increase in net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was due to a $136.3 million increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets and a $97.3 million increase in the average balance of interest-earning liabilities, partially offset by a 43 basis points decrease in the net interest margin (which decreased to 4.84%).

A comparison of net interest income for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 is set forth below on a taxable equivalent basis:


			Quarter Ended September 30,

			2003									2002

						Interest									Interest
			Average			Income/			Yield/			Average			Income/			Yield/
(in thousands of dollars)			Balance			Expense			Rate			Balance			Expense			Rate

ASSETS
Earning assets:
	Interest-bearing deposits in Other banks		$	1,201		$	6			1.98	%	$	1,052		$	6			2.26	%
	Federal funds sold and Securities purchased under Agreement to resell			1,214			3			0.98			14,598			62			1.69
	Taxable investment Securities			409,521			3,886			3.76			320,636			4,055			5.02
	Nontaxable investment securities			30,656			594			7.69			30,981			600			7.68
	Loans ¹			1,236,162			21,728			6.97			1,117,768			21,967			7.80

		Total earning assets		1,678,754			26,217			6.20			1,485,035			26,690			7.13

Nonearning assets:
	Cash and due from banks			47,093									36,010
	Premises and equipment-net			16,145									17,373
	Other assets			54,823									48,986
	Less allowance for loan losses			(31,659	)								(25,666	)

		Total assets	$	1,765,156								$	1,561,738

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
	Savings deposits		$	540,882		$	644			0.47	%	$	478,795		$	1,149			0.95	%
	Time deposits			436,536			1,872			1.70			502,985			3,207			2.53
	Short-term borrowings			124,584			365			1.16			10,442			68			2.58
	Long-term debt			281,724			2,709			3.81			234,513			2,833			4.79

		Total interest-bearing Deposits and liabilities		1,383,726			5,590			1.60			1,226,735			7,257			2.35

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
	Demand deposits			195,127									161,571
	Other liabilities			25,249									25,803

		Total liabilities		1,604,102									1,414,109
Stockholders’ equity				161,054									147,629

		Total liabilities and Stockholders’ equity	$	1,765,156								$	1,561,738

		Net interest income and margin on total earning assets					20,627			4.87	%					19,433			5.19	%

Taxable equivalent adjustment							(208	)								(210	)

		Net interest income				$	20,419								$	19,223

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]

Nine months Ended September 30,

2003 2002

Interest Interest

Average Income/ Yield/ Average Income/ Yield/

(in thousands of dollars) Balance Expense Rate Balance Expense Rate

ASSETS

Earning assets:

Interest-bearing deposits in Other banks
$ 6,131 $ 86 1.88 % $ 1,046 $ 20 2.56 %

Federal funds sold and Securities purchased under Agreement to resell
15,322 142 1.24 6,514 82 1.68

Taxable investment Securities
375,890 11,164 3.97 284,397 11,192 5.26

Nontaxable investment securities
30,729 1,785 7.77 30,967 1,795 7.75

Loans ¹
1,188,933 63,689 7.16 1,157,743 68,373 7.90

Total earning assets
1,617,005 76,866 6.36 1,480,667 81,462 7.36

Nonearning assets:

Cash and due from banks
44,065 34,082

Premises and equipment-net
16,371 17,334

Other assets
54,677 47,473

Less allowance for loan losses
(30,723 ) (23,376 )

Total assets
$ 1,701,395 $ 1,556,180

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Interest-bearing liabilities:

Savings deposits
$ 533,675 $ 2,339 0.59 % $ 466,526 $ 4,240 1.22 %

Time deposits
442,889 6,579 1.99 511,679 9,869 2.58

Short-term borrowings
52,825 486 1.23 23,179 551 3.18

Long-term debt
306,340 8,902 3.89 237,090 8,474 4.78

Total interest-bearing Deposits and liabilities
1,335,729 18,306 1.83 1,238,474 23,134 2.50

Noninterest-bearing liabilities:

Demand deposits
183,635 152,791

Other liabilities
24,869 22,350

Total liabilities
1,544,233 1,413,615

Stockholders’ equity
157,162 142,565

Total liabilities and Stockholders’ equity
$ 1,701,395 $ 1,556,180

Net interest income and margin on total earning assets
58,560 4.84 % 58,328 5.27 %

Taxable equivalent adjustment
(625 ) (628 )

Net interest income
$ 57,935 $ 57,700

(1) Yields and amounts earned include loan fees. Nonaccrual loans have been included in earning assets for purposes of these computations.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS

A summary of nonperforming assets at September 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2002 follows:


					September 30,			December 31,			September 30,
(in thousands of dollars)					2003			2002			2002

Nonperforming assets:
	Nonperforming loans:
		Commercial			$	4,121		$	5,190		$	6,311
		Real estate:
			Commercial			2,839			4,152			3,410
			Residential			3,999			3,219			4,920

				Total real estate loans		6,838			7,371			8,330
		Consumer				153			169			654

				Total nonperforming loans		11,112			12,730			15,295

	Other real estate owned					707			2,193			1,431

				Total nonperforming assets	$	11,819		$	14,923		$	16,726

Past due loans:
	Real estate				$	399		$	72		$	1,402
	Consumer					569			860			1,813

				Total past due loans ⁽¹⁾	$	968		$	932		$	3,215

Restructured:
	Commercial				$	—		$	—		$	2,168
	Real estate:
		Residential				1,599			2,919			5,434

				Total restructured loans ⁽²⁾	$	1,599		$	2,919		$	7,602

Nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate owned (end of period):
		Excluding 90 days past due accruing loans				0.95	%		1.28	%		1.49	%
		Including 90 days past due accruing loans				1.03	%		1.36	%		1.77	%
Nonperforming assets to total assets (end of period):
		Excluding 90 days past due accruing loans				0.64	%		0.89	%		1.05	%
		Including 90 days past due accruing loans				0.69	%		0.95	%		1.26	%

⁽¹⁾ Represents loans which are past due 90 days or more as to principal and/or interest, are still accruing interest and are in the process of collection.

⁽²⁾ Represents loans which have been restructured, are current and still accruing interest.

Nonperforming loans at September 30, 2003 totaled $11.1 million, a decrease of $4.2 million, or 27.3%, as compared to September 30, 2002. Other real estate owned was $707,000 at September 30, 2003, a decrease of $724,000, or 50.6%, from September 30, 2002. The decrease in nonperforming loans and other real estate owned reflects management’s continuing efforts to improve asset quality and the improvement in the Hawaii real estate market and economic environment.

Restructured loans were $1.6 million at September 30, 2003, a decrease of $6.0 million, or 79.0%, from September 30, 2002. The decrease was primarily due to the refinance of certain commercial loans and the payoff of certain residential real estate loans.

The Company’s future levels of nonperforming loans will be reflective of Hawaii’s economy and the financial condition of its customers.

PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

The provision for credit losses is based upon management’s judgment as to the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses (the “Allowance”) to absorb future losses. The Company uses a systematic methodology to determine the adequacy of the Allowance and related provision for credit losses to be reported for financial statement purposes. (See additional discussion under “Allowance for Credit Losses” of “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.”)

The determination of the adequacy of the Allowance is ultimately one of management’s judgment, which includes consideration of many factors, including, among other things, the amount of problem and potential problem loans, net charge-off experience, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio by type and geographic location of loans and in overall loan risk profile and quality, general economic factors and the fair value of collateral.

The following table sets forth the activity in the allowance for credit losses for the periods indicated:


			Nine months ended September 30,
(in thousands of dollars)			2003			2002

Loans outstanding (end of period) ⁽¹⁾			$	1,245,343		$	1,122,680

Average loans outstanding ⁽¹⁾			$	1,188,933		$	1,157,743

Balance at beginning of period			$	27,123		$	19,464
Loans charged off:
	Commercial			1,492			4,607
	Real estate:
		Commercial		473			—
		Residential		204			633
	Consumer			3,694			2,283

		Total loans charged off		5,863			7,523

Recoveries on loans charged off:
	Commercial			1,936			396
	Real estate:
		Commercial		352			361
		Residential		721			362
	Consumer			1,553			655

		Total recoveries on loans previously charged off		4,562			1,774

		Net charge-offs		(1,301	)		(5,749	)

Provision charged to expense				6,030			12,959

Balance at end of period			$	31,852		$	26,674

Net loans charged off to average loans				0.15	% ⁽²⁾		0.66	% ⁽²⁾
Net loans charged off to allowance for credit losses				5.46	% ⁽²⁾		28.82	% ⁽²⁾
Allowance for credit losses to total loans (end of period)				2.56	%		2.38	%
Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans (end of period):
		Excluding 90 days past due accruing loans		2.87	x		1.74	x
		Including 90 days past due accruing loans		2.64	x		1.44	x

⁽¹⁾ Includes loans held for sale.

⁽²⁾ Annualized.

The provision for credit losses was $1.2 million for the third quarter of 2003, a decrease of $2.8 million, or 71.2%, from the same quarter last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the provision for credit losses was $6.0 million, a decrease of $6.9 million, or 53.5%, from the same period last year. The decrease in the provision for credit losses in 2003, as compared to 2002, reflects the material improvement in asset quality (nonperforming assets declined to $11.8 million at September 30, 2003 from $16.7 million at September 30, 2002) supplemented by a $2.8 million increase in recoveries on loans previously charged off. The Company’s lower provision versus the same period last year reflects material improvement in asset quality and the stronger Hawaii economy.

The Allowance at September 30, 2003 was $31.9 million, an increase of $5.2 million from the $26.7 million at September 30, 2002, and represented 2.56% of total loans, as compared to 2.38% at September 30, 2002. The increase in the Allowance was primarily due to the $126.1 million increase in total gross loans outstanding at September 30, 2003 as compared to September 30, 2002. The increase in total loans was partly due to the Company’s entry into the California commercial real estate lending market through loan production offices opened in the first quarter of 2003.

Net charge-offs were $1.3 million for the first nine months of 2003, a decrease of $4.4 million, or 77.4%, over the same period in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to an increase in commercial loan and consumer recoveries, which increased by $1.5 million and $898,000, respectively. The increase in commercial loan recoveries was related primarily to the repayment of a commercial real estate loan previously charged off.

The Allowance increased to 2.87 times nonperforming loans (excluding 90 days past due accruing loans) at September 30, 2003 from 1.74 times at September 30, 2002 as a result of the increase in the Allowance and decrease in nonperforming loans.

In management’s judgment, the Allowance was adequate to absorb potential losses currently inherent in the loan portfolio at September 30, 2003. However, changes in prevailing economic conditions in the Company’s markets or in the financial condition of its customers could result in changes in the level of nonperforming assets and charge-offs in the future and, accordingly, changes in the Allowance.

NONINTEREST INCOME

Noninterest income totaled $5.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $3.4 million, or 216.1%, over the comparable period in 2002. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, noninterest income was $17.0 million, an increase of $7.7 million, or 82.6%, over the comparable period in 2002.

Net gains on the sale of securities increased $2.3 million and $2.6 million, or 152.8% and 162.2%, respectively, for the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003 over the comparable periods in 2002. The increase was primarily due to $800,000 in net gains on the sale of securities for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as compared to a $1.5 million net loss on the sale of securities during the same period in 2002.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded an impairment charge on asset-backed securities of $1.4 million under EITF 99-20. There was no impairment charge in 2003.

Item processing fee income increased $354,000 and $1.1 million, or 350.4% and 362.2%, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003 over the comparable periods in 2002. The increase was due to the California operations of Datatronix Financial Services, Inc. Datatronix Financial Services, Inc. offers item processing services in Hawaii and California.

Other noninterest income increased $1.5 million, or 64.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 over the comparable period in 2002. The increase in other noninterest income was primarily due to income recorded in connection with an insurance company demutualization distribution.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

Noninterest expense totaled $16.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, an increase of $3.2 million, or 24.5%, from the comparable period in 2002. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, noninterest expense was $48.4 million, an increase of $8.8 million, or 22.4%, from the comparable period in 2002.

The increase for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003 was primarily due to expenses of $1.9 million and $6.2 million, respectively, associated with the defense of the unsolicited takeover proposal by Central Pacific Financial Corp. announced on April 16, 2003 – see discussion on “Unsolicited Takeover Proposal.” These defense costs include attorneys, investment bankers, solicitation fees and advertising expenses.

Salaries and employee benefits increased $798,000, or 12.3%, and $2.3 million, or 11.7%, for the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2002. The increases were primarily due to additional loan production and item processing personnel.

INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective income tax rate for the first nine months of 2003 was 32.5% as compared to 32.0% for the same period in 2002, and reflects the utilization of state investment tax credits.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The consolidated statements of cash flows identify three major sources and uses of cash as operating, investing and financing activities. The Company’s operating activities used $201.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, compared to providing $24.0 million in the same period during 2002. The primary use of cash flow from operations was funding loans originated for sale, which totaled $372.0 million and $143.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This was offset by proceeds of $156.8 million and $147.3 million from the sale of loans held for sale in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The Company’s most liquid assets are cash, interest-bearing deposits, Federal funds sold, investment securities available for sale and loans held for sale. The levels of these assets are dependent on the Company’s operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At September 30, 2003, cash, interest bearing deposits, Federal funds sold, available for sale investment and mortgage/asset-backed securities and loans held for sale totaled $440.6 million, an increase of 34.8% from $326.9 million at September 30, 2002.

Investing activities provided cash flow of $16.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, compared to $8.0 million during the same period in 2002. The primary sources of cash from investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were proceeds from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities of $232.4 million, which compares to $72.6 million during the same period in 2002. The primary use of cash flow from investing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was the purchase of held-to–maturity and available–for-sale investment securities of $258.1 million, which compares to $212.3 million during the same period in 2002.

Financing activities provided cash of $155.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003, compared to using $19.5 million during the same period in 2002. The primary sources of cash flows from financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were the net increase in short-term borrowings of $194.0 million offset by a decrease in long-term debt of $55 million, which compares to decreases of $30.7 million and $25.0 million, respectively, during the same period in 2002.

At September 30, 2003, as compared to September 30, 2002, the Company had $1.8 billion in assets, up 16.0%; $1.2 billion in loans, up 10.9%; and $1.2 billion in deposits, up 4.0%.

At any time, the Company has a significant number of outstanding commitments to extend credit. These commitments take the form of approved lines of credit and loans (with terms of up to one year) and letters of credit. At September 30, 2003, loan commitments and letters of credit were $364.1 million and $8.9 million, respectively.

The Company and the Bank are subject to capital standards promulgated by the Federal banking agencies and the Hawaii Division of Financial Institutions. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy required the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table at September 30, 2003 and 2002) of Tier 1 and Total capital to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets.

REGULATORY CAPITAL


													To Be Well-
													Capitalized
													Under Prompt
								For Capital					Corrective Action
			Actual					Adequacy Purposes					Provisions

(dollars in thousands)			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio

As of September 30, 2003
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted
	Assets:
		Consolidated	$	159,382		11.60	%	$	54,944		4.00	%		N/A
		Bank		150,295		10.96			54,867		4.00		$	82,300		6.00	%
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted
	Assets:
		Consolidated	$	176,764		12.87	%	$	109,888		8.00	%		N/A
		Bank		167,652		12.22			109,734		8.00		$	137,167		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital to Average
	Assets:
		Consolidated	$	159,382		9.03	%	$	70,606		4.00	%		N/A
		Bank		150,295		8.54			70,409		4.00		$	88,012		5.00	%
As of September 30, 2002
Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted
	Assets:
		Consolidated	$	146,747		12.61	%	$	46,547		4.00	%		N/A
		Bank		137,840		11.86			46,482		4.00		$	69,722		6.00	%
Total Capital to Risk-Weighted
	Assets:
		Consolidated	$	161,461		13.88	%	$	93,094		8.00	%		N/A
		Bank		152,546		13.13			92,963		8.00		$	116,204		10.00	%
Tier 1 Capital to Average
	Assets:
		Consolidated	$	146,747		9.40	%	$	62,470		4.00	%		N/A
		Bank		137,840		8.84			62,359		4.00		$	77,949		5.00	%

Unsolicited Takeover Proposal

On April 16, 2003, Central Pacific Financial Corp., a Hawaii corporation (“CPF”), delivered an unsolicited proposal to merge with CB Bancshares, Inc. (the “Parent Company”). CPF’s proposal included the exchange of each share of the Parent Company’s common stock outstanding for $21 in cash and 1.8956 shares of CPF common stock.

On April 17, 2003, the Parent Company announced that it had received the proposal from CPF, and on April 23, 2003, it advised CPF that the Parent Company’s Board would address the merger proposal promptly and in an orderly manner and would respond in a timely fashion. On April 23, the Parent Company also issued a press release announcing that it had engaged a financial advisor and legal counsel to assist its Board of Directors and management team in evaluating CPF’s merger proposal.

On April 28, 2003, CPF filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in which it described its intent to commence an exchange offer for all outstanding shares of the Parent Company’s common stock. On the same day, CPF filed applications with federal and state regulators in furtherance of its proposed exchange offer. Also on April 28, 2003, CPF delivered to the Parent Company a letter requesting a special meeting of shareholders of the Parent Company to vote on whether to approve CPF’s acquisition of shares of the Parent Company’s common stock pursuant to the proposed exchange offer under the Hawaii Control Share Acquisitions Act.

On April 29, 2003, the Parent Company announced that at its Board of Directors meeting held on April 23, 2003, the Board declared a 10% stock dividend and a cash dividend of $0.12 per common share for the second quarter of 2003, payable on June 27, 2003 to stockholders of record on June 16, 2003. Similar 10% stock dividends were declared in the second quarters of 2001 and 2002.

On May 1, 2003, CPF announced that, in light of the 10% stock dividend announced by the Parent Company on April 29, it was amending its offer so that the per share amount of cash to be paid and number of shares of CPF common stock to be issued pursuant to the proposed offer to exchange was adjusted from $21.00 to $19.09 in cash and from 1.8956 to 1.7233 in shares of CPF common stock.

On May 2, 2003, CPF amended and supplemented its prior application submitted to the Division of Financial Institutions of the Department of Commerce & Consumer Affairs of Hawaii to include a request that the Commissioner of the Division approve CPF making a tender/exchange offer, pursuant to Section 412:3-612(a)(2) of the Hawaii Revised Statutes. CPF cannot commence its proposed offer to exchange until such application is approved.

On May 4, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Parent Company met with senior management and independent financial and legal advisors to consider and discuss CPF’s merger proposal and the Parent Company’s response. After careful consideration, the Board concluded that the CPF proposal was inadequate and not in the best interests of the Parent Company. The Board of Directors of the Parent Company authorized the issuance of a press release and delivery of a

letter to CPF communicating its determination. Accordingly, on May 4, 2003, the Parent Company issued a press release announcing the Board’s unanimous rejection of CPF’s proposal.

On May 5, 2003, the Parent Company received a letter from CPF requesting that the date of the special meeting be moved by three weeks, from May 28, 2003 to June 19, 2003. On May 7, 2003, the Parent Company delivered to CPF a letter rejecting CPF’s request.

On May 9, 2003, CPF delivered a letter to the Parent Company purporting to “rescind, revoke and withdraw” its April 15 merger proposal and the related information statement delivered on April 28. In the same letter, CPF argued that in light of its withdrawal of its prior proposal, the special meeting scheduled for May 28 was “moot” and should be cancelled.

Also on May 9, 2003, CPF delivered a second letter to the Parent Company presenting a revised proposal pursuant to which the Parent Company’s shareholders would receive 1.7606 shares of CPF common stock and $24.50 in cash for each outstanding share of common stock (or 1.6005 shares and $22.27 in cash per share of common stock on a post-stock dividend basis). This revised proposal did not materially modify the value of the total consideration offered by CPF, but only changed the mix of cash and stock consideration to be received per share of common stock.

On May 9, 2003, CPF also amended its registration statement on Form S-4 so that the consideration to be paid in its proposed offer to exchange would be the same as that to be paid pursuant to the proposal reflected in CPF’s May 9 letter to the Parent Company.

On May 12, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Parent Company met with senior management and independent financial and legal advisors to consider and discuss CPF’s revised proposal and the Parent Company’s response. After careful consideration, the Board unanimously concluded that the revised proposal was inadequate and not in the best interests of the Parent Company. Following the Board meeting, the Parent Company issued a press release announcing the Board’s unanimous decision. The Parent Company also advised CPF that the special meeting to consider CPF’s control share acquisition would be held on May 28, 2003, as the Parent Company’s Board had previously scheduled in accordance with Hawaii law and CPF’s letter dated April 28, 2003.

On May 13, 2003, CPF delivered to the Parent Company a letter requesting that a special meeting of shareholders be held on June 26, 2003 to vote on CPF’s control share acquisition proposal. CPF’s letter was accompanied by letters executed by a number of the Parent Company’s shareholders purporting to designate CPF as their agent to call a special meeting. The Parent Company believed that CPF’s request was invalid because, among other things, a special meeting of shareholders had already been properly called by the Board of Directors of the Parent Company to consider the control share acquisition proposal. CPF disputed the Parent Company’s position and maintained that the May 28 special meeting was “moot.”

On May 14, 2003, CPF filed a complaint against the Parent Company in the Hawaii State court seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent the Parent Company from holding the special meeting or taking any actions in furtherance of a solicitation in connection with the special meeting. On May 16, 2003, CPF’s motion for a temporary restraining order was denied.

On May 28, 2003, the Parent Company announced that based on the proxies submitted to the independent inspector of elections at the May 28 special meeting, it believed that the Parent Company’s shareholders rejected CPF’s proposal to acquire a majority of the Parent Company’s outstanding shares.

On May 28, 2003, the Parent Company also announced that its Board of Directors amended the Parent Company’s shareholder rights plan to avoid a distribution of the rights as a result of CPF’s invalid request for a special meeting. Under the plan as it existed prior to the amendment, a distribution of the rights would have resulted from CPF’s obtaining authorizations to call a special shareholders meeting from the Parent Company’s shareholders owning approximately 27% of the outstanding shares in a non-public solicitation. The amendment to the plan states that CPF will not be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the shares underlying any of these authorizations unless the authorization ultimately is delivered to the Parent Company for a valid and effective purpose under Hawaii law and the Parent Company’s governing documents.

On June 12, 2003, the Parent Company announced that the independent inspectors of election certified the final results of the shareholder vote at the special meeting held on May 28, 2003, confirming that the Parent Company’s shareholders rejected CPF’s proposal to acquire a majority of the Parent Company’s outstanding shares.

On June 17, 2003, CPF announced that it would not continue to pursue the special meeting of shareholders that CPF purported to call for June 26, 2003.

On June 28, 2003, the Parent Company announced that CPF withdrew all pending legal claims made against the Parent Company regarding the May 28, 2003 special shareholders’ meeting. The Parent Company also announced that Circuit Court Judge Victoria Marks approved the stipulation dismissing CPF’s complaint with prejudice, meaning its claims regarding the validity of the May 28 shareholders meeting cannot be re-filed.

On July 22, 2003, the Parent Company announced that it had filed a lawsuit in Hawaii State court against CPF asserting that CPF violated the Hawaii Control Share Acquisitions statute. The lawsuit alleged that CPF illegally formed a voting group with certain shareholders of the Parent Company without obtaining the approval of the Parent Company’s shareholders as required by Hawaii law.

On July 30, 2003, CPF filed a complaint against the Parent Company in the Hawaii State court seeking to invalidate provisions of the Parent Company’s new Rights Plan and bylaws, both adopted on July 23, 2003. CPF also seeks to enjoin the Parent Company from using its Rights Plans and bylaws.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company disclosed both quantitative and qualitative analyses of market risks in its 2002 Form 10-K. No significant changes have occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2003.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Clarridge Complaint

On April 28, 2003, Barbara Clarridge (the “Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against the Parent Company and each of the members of the Parent Company’s Board of Directors in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii. The case is denominated as a class action on behalf of all shareholders of the Parent Company although no proceedings have taken place regarding possible class certification. Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that CPF proposed exchange offer is futile without approval of the Parent Company’s directors because of the Parent Company’s Rights Plan, and that the defendants have refused to seriously consider the CPF offer. The complaint seeks a judgment: (1) directing the defendants to give due consideration to any proposed business combination; (2) directing the defendants to assure that no conflicts of interest exist between the directors and their duties to the corporation; (3) awarding the plaintiff the costs and attorneys’ fees; and (4) granting such other relief as the court deems proper.

On May 8, 2003, the Plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction asking the court to: (1) enjoin indefinitely, until further order of the court, the special shareholders’ meeting scheduled for May 28, 2003; (2) enjoin enforcement of the Bylaw amendment adopted May 4, 2003 regarding adjournment of shareholders meetings; and (3) enjoin any further amendment to the Parent Company Bylaws prior to the special shareholders’ meeting.

On May 23, 2003, the Parent Company announced that the court denied the Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to halt the Parent Company’s May 28 special meeting of shareholders.

On July 14, 2003, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, in which she updated the complaint’s factual allegations to reflect the results of the May 28, 2003 special shareholder’s meeting and alleged that the Parent Company’s Directors had further breached their fiduciary duties by amending the Parent Company’s Rights Plan on May 28, 2003.

The Parent Company believes the claims are without merit and intends to defend against them vigorously.

CPF Complaints

On May 15, 2003, CPF filed a complaint against the Parent Company in the Hawaii State court seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to stop the May 28, 2003 shareholders’ meeting called by the Parent Company to consider matters related to CPF’s merger proposal. The suit also asked the court to: (1) declare the meeting in violation of Hawaii law; (2) find the meeting moot because CPF’s first offer to the Parent Company had been revoked and withdrawn; and (3) stop the Parent Company from soliciting shareholder proxies for that May 28, 2003 meeting.

On May 16, 2003, the Hawaii State court denied CPF’s motion for a temporary restraining order to block the Parent Company from providing its shareholders with proxy material regarding CPF’s hostile takeover proposal.

On May 20, 2003, CPF withdrew, without prejudice, its motion for a preliminary injunction to stop the May 28, 2003 special shareholders’ meeting of the Parent Company.

On May 20, 2003, the Parent Company asserted counterclaims against CPF seeking injunctive and declaratory relief for CPF’s violations of Hawaii’s Control Share Acquisitions statute. The Parent Company alleges, among other things, that CPF violated Hawaii law by soliciting proxies well in advance of the statutory period – thirty days prior to a scheduled shareholder meeting – and that CPF failed to obtain shareholder approval, as required by statute, prior to acquiring beneficial ownership of more than ten percent of the outstanding shares of stock of the Parent Company.

On June 30, 2003, CPF filed a Motion to dismiss portions of the Parent Company’s counterclaim. On August 6, 2003, CPF withdrew its motion to dismiss after the Circuit Court had ruled that the Parent Company is entitled to take discovery in support of its remaining claims under the Hawaii Control Share Acquisition statute. On July 30, 2003, CPF filed a complaint against the Parent Company in the State court of Hawaii seeking to invalidate provisions of the Parent Company’s new Rights Plan and bylaws, both adopted on July 23, 2003. CPF also seeks to enjoin the Parent Company from using its Rights Plans and bylaws.

On August 19, 2003, CPF filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings in the Parent Company’s counterclaim. CPF argued in the motion that Hawaii’s Control Share Acquisitions statute could not be triggered by the voting agreement between CPF and the Parent Company’s shareholders and that the statute was unconstitutional. On September 29, 2003, the court rejected CPF’s arguments regarding the applicability and constitutionality of the statute and denied CPF’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Thus, the Parent Company’s counterclaim remains in the first

lawsuit filed by CPF, and was amended on October 31, 2003 to include additional allegations. The parties have recently commenced the discovery process in the CPF lawsuit, including the production of documents and oral depositions.

The Company’s Complaint

On July 22, 2003, the Parent Company announced that it had filed a lawsuit in Hawaii State court against CPF asserting that CPF violated the Hawaii Control Share Acquisitions statute. The lawsuit alleges that CPF illegally formed a voting group with certain shareholders of the Parent Company without obtaining the approval of the Parent Company’s shareholders as required by Hawaii law.

On August 19, 2003, CPF filed a motion to dismiss the Parent Company’s complaint. CPF argued in the motion that the complaint was duplicative of the Parent Company’s counterclaim asserted in the first lawsuit filed by CPF, that Hawaii’s Control Share Acquisitions statute could not be triggered by voting agreements or arrangements between CPF and the Parent Company’s shareholders, and that the statute was unconstitutional. On September 29, 2003, the court denied the motion to dismiss on the substantive arguments, but granted the motion in part based on procedural grounds, finding similar claims had already been filed in the Parent Company’s counterclaim in the first CPF lawsuit. Thus, the Parent Company’s lawsuit has been dismissed. However, in its ruling the court specifically granted the Parent Company leave to file an amended counterclaim in the first lawsuit filed by CPF to include all additional allegations made in the Parent Company’s complaint. Therefore, all of the allegations made in the Parent Company’s lawsuit have been incorporated in the amended counterclaim, which was filed on October 31, 2003.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On July 23, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Parent Company adopted an amendment to the Parent Company’s existing rights agreement, dated as of March 16, 1989, as amended (the “1989 Rights Agreement”), to provide that the rights which are attached to the Parent Company’s Common Stock will be exercisable only if a person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 20% or more of the Parent Company’s common stock prior to the close of business on August 4, 2003, or commences a tender or exchange offer on or prior to July 23, 2003, which, if completed, would result in such person or group beneficially owning 30% or more of the Parent Company’s common stock. This amendment was previously reported in and filed as an exhibit to the Parent Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 24, 2003 (the “July 8-K”). The foregoing is qualified in its entirety by reference to the amendment to the 1989 Rights Agreement filed in the July 8-K.

On July 23, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Parent Company declared a dividend distribution of one right for each outstanding share of Parent Company Common Stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on August 4, 2003. Each right entitles the registered holder to purchase from the Parent Company a unit consisting of one one-hundredth of a share (a “Unit”) of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share at a Purchase Price of $225.00 per Unit, subject to adjustment or, in certain circumstances, shares of Parent Company Common Stock. The description and terms of the rights are set forth in a Rights Agreement (the “2003 Rights Agreement”) between the Parent Company and City Bank, as Rights Agent. The

2003 Rights Agreement was previously reported in and filed as an exhibit to the July 8-K. The foregoing is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 2003 Rights Agreement filed in the July 8-K.

Item 5. Other Information

The Parent Company’s Bylaws, as amended on July 23, 2003, provide that stockholder proposals submitted outside the Rule 14a-8 process for consideration at the Parent Company’s 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2004 Annual Meeting”) and stockholder nominations of directors for the 2004 Annual Meeting must be received by the Parent Company no earlier than December 26, 2003 and no later than January 25, 2004.

Stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 for consideration for inclusion in the Parent Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy for the 2004 Annual Meeting must be received by the Parent Company no later than November 14, 2003.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits


	3.3			Amendments to the Company’s bylaws, dated as of April 23, 2003, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 5, 2003

	3.4			Amendment to the Company’s bylaws, dated as of May 4, 2003, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 5, 2003

	4.7			Amendment No. 5 to the Company’s existing Rights Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2003, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 29, 2003

	4.8			Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s existing Rights Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 24, 2003

	4.9			Rights Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2003 by and between CB Bancshares, Inc. and City Bank, as Rights Agent, including the form of Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock attached as Exhibit A thereto and the form of Rights Certificate attached as Exhibit B thereto incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 24, 2003.

	10.1			Amendment to Change in Control Agreements

	10.2			Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement for Douglas R. Weld

	31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	32.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

	32.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

On July 22, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under “Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure (Information furnished pursuant to Item 12, “Disclosure of Results of Operations and financial Condition”). ”

On July 24, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under “Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure” and “Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits.”

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


		CB BANCSHARES, INC.
		(Registrant)

Date November 12, 2003		By /s/ Dean K. Hirata

		Dean K. Hirata
		Senior Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal financial officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX


			3.3			Amendments to the Company’s bylaws, dated as of April 23, 2003, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 5, 2003

			3.4			Amendment to the Company’s bylaws, dated as of May 4, 2003, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 5, 2003

			4.7			Amendment No. 5 to the Company’s existing Rights Agreement, dated as of May 28, 2003, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 29, 2003

			4.8			Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s existing Rights Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2003, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 24, 2003

			4.9			Rights Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2003 by and between CB Bancshares, Inc. and City Bank, as Rights Agent, including the form of Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock attached as Exhibit A thereto and the form of Rights Certificate attached as Exhibit B thereto incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 24, 2003.

			10.1			Amendment to Change in Control Agreements

			10.2			Supplemental Executive Retirement Agreement for Douglas R. Weld

			31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

			31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

			32.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

			32.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

⁽¹⁾		Represents loans which are past due 90 days or more as to principal and/or interest, are still accruing interest and are in the process of collection.

⁽²⁾		Represents loans which have been restructured, are current and still accruing interest.

		On July 22, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under “Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure (Information furnished pursuant to Item 12, “Disclosure of Results of Operations and financial Condition”). ”

		On July 24, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under “Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure” and “Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits.”