Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

OR

Commission File Number: 0-20736

Sport Chalet, Inc.

One Sport Chalet Drive, La Canada, CA 91011
(Address of principal executive offices)

(818) 949-5301
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

Number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, as of October 31, 2003: 6,635,334

1

Table of Contents

SPORT CHALET, INC.

Index to Form 10-Q

2

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     Item 1. Financial Statements.

SPORT CHALET, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes.

3

Table of Contents

SPORT CHALET, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes.

4

Table of Contents

SPORT CHALET, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes.

5

Table of Contents

SPORT CHALET, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

1. Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented have been included.

     The financial data at March 31, 2003 is derived from audited financial statements which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003, and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

2. Earnings per Share

     Earnings per share, basic, is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Earnings per share, diluted, is computed based on the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding for the period. A reconciliation is as follows:

6

Table of Contents

3. Stock Compensation

     In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, and Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123” (“SFAS No.148”). SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to fair value based method of accounting for employee stock-based compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure in annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based compensation and its effects on reporting. The Company continues to apply the principles of APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. Accordingly, no compensation expense has been recorded in conjunction with options issued to employees. Had compensation cost been determined based on the fair value of the options at the grant date and amortized over the option’s vesting period, consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income would have been (in thousands except per share information):

     The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in fiscal 2004; expected volatility of 41%; risk-free interest rate of 4.0% expected lives from one to four years and expected dividends of 0%. The Black-Scholes model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

7

Table of Contents

4. New Accounting Pronouncements

     In November 2002, the FASB issued Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16 (“Issue 02-16”), “Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor.” Issue 02-16 addresses the issue of how a reseller of a vendor’s product should account for cash consideration received from a vendor. The adoption of Issue 02-16, effective with agreements entered into after November 21, 2002, did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

8

Table of Contents

     Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Item 2 constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below under the heading “Factors That May Affect Future Results” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Company’s management. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) provides certain “safe harbor” provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made pursuant to the Act.

     The following should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and related notes thereto provided under Item 1 — Financial Statements above.

Results of Operations

     The following tables set forth statements of operations data and relative percentages of net sales for the periods indicated (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts).

     Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2002. Sales increased from $56.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002 to $61.8 million for the same period this year, a 9.8% increase. The increase is the result of opening two new stores in late November 2002, aided by a comparable store sales increase of 3.7%. Same store sales are based upon stores opened throughout both periods.

     Gross profit as a percent of sales increased from 29.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2002, to 29.9% for the same three month period ended September 30, 2003. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to lower markdowns in dollars and as a percent of sales attributed to the Company’s focus on improved inventory procurement and administration.

     Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percent of sales, decreased from 25.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2002, to 25.2% for the same period this year. The decrease is primarily a result of higher same store sales.

9

Table of Contents

     The effective income tax rate was 39.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2003. These rates differ from the statutory rate of 39.8% primarily as a result of permanent differences between financial reporting and tax-basis income.

     Net income increased from $1.4 million, or $0.20 per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2002, to $1.7 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, for the same period this year, primarily as a result of lower markdowns and increased same store sales.

     Six Months Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Six Months Ended September 30, 2002. Sales increased from $107.5 million for the six months ended September 30, 2002 to $115.1 million for the same period this year, a 7.1% increase. The increase is the result of opening two new stores in late November 2002, aided by a comparable store sales increase of 1.0%. Same store sales are based upon stores opened throughout both periods.

     Gross profit as a percent of sales increased from 28.4% for the six months ended September 30, 2002, to 28.9% for the same six month period ended September 30, 2003. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to lower markdowns in dollars and as a percent of sales attributed to the Company’s focus on improved inventory procurement and administration.

     Selling, general and administrative expenses, as a percent of sales, increased from 26.0% for the six months ended September 30, 2002, to 27.2% for the same period this year. The increase is primarily a result of higher advertising expense attributed to the timing of vendor reimbursements and the write-off of undepreciated assets as a result of two large-scale store remodels in the first quarter, offset in part by the increase in same store sales.

     The effective income tax rate was 40.0% for the six months ended September 30, 2002, compared to 40.1% for the same period this year. These rates differ from the statutory rate of 39.8% primarily as a result of permanent differences between financial reporting and tax-basis income.

     Net income decreased from $1.5 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, for the six months ended September 30, 2002, to $1.1 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, for the same period this year, primarily as a result of increased advertising expense and the costs associated with remodels.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     The Company’s primary capital requirements are for inventory and store expansion, relocation and remodeling. Historically, cash from operations, credit terms from vendors and bank borrowing have met the Company’s liquidity needs. Management believes that these sources will be sufficient to fund currently anticipated cash requirements for the foreseeable future.

     Net cash provided by operating activities is primarily the result of net income, adjusted for depreciation and amortization, and increases in accounts payable partially offset by inventory purchases. For the six months ended September 30, 2003, $3.1 million was generated compared to $3.3 million used by operating activities for the same period last year.

     Inventories increased by $10.8 million and $13.8 million for the six months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, compared to the respective year-end balances primarily due to the build-up of seasonal inventory. The average inventory per store decreased by 7.1% at September 30, 2003 compared to September 30, 2002, as the Company has focused on inventory management. As a result,

10

Table of Contents

inventory at September 30, 2003 is only slightly greater than the same period last year notwithstanding the opening of two stores since the end of this period in the prior year.

     Bank overdraft represents the total of checks in transit in excess of cash on hand. The overdraft is expected to continue and fluctuate due to the timing of vendor payments. Historically, accounts payable has increased as inventory increases. In the six months ended September 30, 2003, accounts payable combined with the bank overdraft increased by $9.0 million compared to $6.6 million for the six months ended September 30, 2002. The relative change as compared to inventory levels is primarily the result of the timing of inventory receipts during the period.

     Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended September 30, 2003 was $3.7 million compared to $2.4 million for the same period ended September 30, 2002; the increase is primarily the result of capital expenditures for two large scale remodels of mature stores during the period. As a result of the Company’s continued expansion it will spend approximately $3.6 million in opening three locations this fall, and has so far committed to three new store sites in fiscal 2005, for which forecasted capital expenditures are expected to be $3.2 million

     Net cash provided by financing activities reflects advances and repayment of borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facility. Due to improved inventory management the Company did not borrow on this facility during the period ended September 30, 2003.

     The Company’s amended credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. (the “Lender”) provides for advances up to $20.0 million, increasing to $35.0 million for the period October 1, through December 31, each year, less the amount of any outstanding draws, up to a $4.0 million maximum in authorized letters of credit. Interest accrues at the Lender’s prime rate plus .25% (4.25% at September 30, 2003) or can be fixed for a period of time at the then current rate established under one of several indices, all at the Company’s option. In addition, there is an unused commitment fee of .20% per year, based on a weighted average formula. This credit facility expires on September 30, 2005, and the Company expects to renegotiate and extend the term of this agreement or obtain another form of financing before that date. The Company’s obligation to the Lender is presently secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Company’s non-real estate assets, and the Company is subject to several restrictive covenants. The principal operating covenants require the Company to maintain certain minimum cash flow coverage and debt to equity ratios and restrict the level of capital expenditures, calculated on a quarterly basis. The Company currently is in compliance with the covenants. The Company believes its credit line with the Lender is sufficient to fund capital expenditures for the foreseeable future and to meet seasonal fluctuations in cash flow requirements. However, unexpected conditions could require the Company to request additional borrowing capacity from the Lender or alter its expansion plans or operations.

     The Company’s primary contractual obligations and commitments as of March 31, 2003, are its store leases with initial terms expiring from 2004 through 2020 and typically provide for multiple five-year renewal option:

11

Table of Contents

     All retail store leases provide for base rent which may or may not be credited against percentage rent based upon gross sales from the premises. In some of the leases, base rental amounts increase as the lease term progresses, although in some cases, the Company expects that percentage rent will more than offset the base rental amounts.

     No cash dividends were declared on Common Stock in fiscal 2003. The Company intends to retain earnings for use in the operation and expansion of its business and, therefore, does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

     The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In preparing the financial statements, the Company is required to make estimates and judgments which affect the results of its operations and the reported value of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The Company believes that the following summarizes critical accounting policies which require significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

     Inventory Valuation. Merchandise inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out determined by the retail method of accounting) or market. The Company considers cost to include direct cost of merchandise, plus internal costs associated with merchandise procurement, storage and handling. The Company regularly reviews aged and excess inventories to determine if the carrying value of such inventories exceeds market value; a reserve is recorded to reduce the carrying value to market value as necessary. A determination of market value requires estimates and judgment based on the Company’s historical markdown experience and anticipated markdowns based on future merchandising and advertising plans, seasonal considerations, expected business trends and other factors.

     Gift Certificate Redemption. The Company offers its customers the option of purchasing gift certificates which may be used toward the future purchase of the Company’s product offerings. These gift certificates have no expiration dates. The Company records unredeemed gift certificates as a liability until the point of redemption. The Company’s historical experience indicates that not all issued gift certificates get redeemed. Accordingly, the Company periodically adjusts the carrying value of the gift certificate liability. The Company monitors redemptions rates as a percent of issuances and uses this information to estimate probable redemption of all outstanding gift certificates. This calculation is based on historical experience, and future redemption rates may vary if consumer purchasing practices change.

Factors That May Affect Future Results

          The Company’s short and long-term success is subject to many factors that are beyond the Company’s control. Stockholders and prospective stockholders in the Company should consider carefully the following risk factors, in addition to other information contained in this report. This Report on Form l0-Q contains forward-looking statements, which are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors including those set forth below.

     Economic Conditions. The retail industry historically has been subject to substantial cyclical variations. The merchandise sold by the Company is generally a discretionary expense for its customers. A recession in the general economy or uncertainties regarding future economic prospects that affect

12

Table of Contents

consumer spending habits has had, and may in the future have, a materially adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

     Competition. The sporting goods business and the retail environment are highly competitive, and the Company competes with national, regional and local full-line sporting goods chains, specialty stores, supplier owned stores, discount and department stores, and e-tailers. A number of the Company’s competitors are larger and have greater resources than the Company.

     Regional Market Concentration. Currently, all of the Company’s stores are located in Southern California and the Las Vegas area of Nevada. Accordingly, the Company is subject to regional risks, such as the economy, weather conditions, natural disasters and government regulations. For example, warm winter weather in the resorts frequented by Southern California residents has affected sales in the past. When the region suffers an economic downturn or when other adverse events occur, historically there has been an adverse effect on the Company’s net sales and profitability and this could also affect the Company’s ability to implement its planned growth. Several of the Company’s competitors operate stores across the United States and, thus, are not as vulnerable as the Company to such regional risks.

     Reliance on a Single Distribution Center. The Company currently relies on a single distribution center in Ontario, California. Any natural disaster or other serious disruption to this distribution center due to fire, earthquake or any other cause could damage a significant portion of the Company’s inventory and could materially impair both the Company’s ability to adequately stock its stores and the Company’s net sales and profitability.

     Expansion Plan. The Company’s continued growth depends on a strategy of opening new, profitable stores in existing markets and in new regional markets. The ability to successfully implement this growth strategy could be negatively affected by any of the following:

	•		suitable sites may not be available for leasing;
	•		the Company may not be able to negotiate acceptable lease terms;
	•		the Company might not be able to hire and retain qualified store personnel; and
	•		the Company might not have the financial resources necessary to fund the Company’s expansion plans.

     In addition, the Company’s expansion in new and existing markets may present competitive, distribution and merchandising challenges that differ from the current challenges. These potential new challenges include competition among the Company’s stores, added strain on the Company’s distribution center, additional information to be processed by the Company’s information systems and diversion of management attention from ongoing operations. The Company faces additional challenges in entering new markets, including consumers’ lack of awareness of the Company, difficulties in hiring personnel and problems due to the Company’s unfamiliarity with local real estate markets and demographics. New markets may also have different competitive conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns than the Company’s existing markets. To the extent that the Company is not able to meet these new challenges, net sales could decrease and operating costs could increase. Furthermore, a decline in the Company’s overall financial performance, increased rents or any other adverse effects arising from the commercial real estate market in the Company’s markets may adversely affect the Company’s current growth plan. There can be no assurance that the Company will possess sufficient funds to finance the expenditures related to its planned growth, that new stores can be opened on a timely basis, that such new stores can be operated on a profitable basis, or that such growth will be manageable.

13

Table of Contents

     Future Capital Requirements. The Company may not be able to fund its future growth or react to competitive pressures if it lacks sufficient funds. Unexpected conditions could cause the Company to be in violation of its Lender’s operating covenants. Currently, the Company feels it has sufficient cash available through its bank credit facilities and cash from operations to fund existing operations for the foreseeable future. The Company cannot be certain that additional financing will be available in the future if necessary.

     Management of Growth. Since its inception, the Company has experienced periods of rapid growth. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in maintaining or increasing its sales in the future. Any future growth in sales will require additional working capital and may place a significant strain on the Company’s management, information systems, inventory management and distribution facilities. Any failure to timely enhance the Company’s operating systems, or unexpected difficulties in implementing such enhancements, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

     Dependence on Key Personnel. The Company depends on the continued service of its senior management. The loss of the services of any key employee could hurt the business. Also, the future success of the Company depends on its ability to identify, attract, hire, train and motivate other highly skilled personnel. Failure to do so may adversely affect future results.

     Seasonality. The Company’s sales volume increases significantly during the Holiday season as is typical with other sporting goods retailers. In addition, the Company’s product mix has historically emphasized cold weather sporting goods increasing the seasonality of the Company’s business. In recent years the months of November, December and January represent between 31% and 33%, of the Company’s total net sales, while winter-related products ranged from 15% to 19% of total net sales. The operating results historically have been influenced by the amount and timing of snowfall at the resorts frequented by those living in Southern California. An early snowfall often has influenced sales because it generally extends the demand for winter apparel and equipment, while a late snowfall may have the opposite effect. Suppliers in the ski and snowboard industry require the Company to make commitments for purchases of apparel and equipment by April for fall delivery, and only limited quantities of merchandise can be reordered during the fall. Consequently, the Company places its orders in the spring anticipating snowfall in the winter. If the snowfall does not at least provide an adequate base or occurs late in the season, or if sales do not meet projections, the Company may be required to mark down its winter apparel and equipment.

     Variability of Quarterly Results. The Company has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, a substantial variation in its net sales and operating results from quarter to quarter. The Company believes that the factors which influence this variability of quarterly results include general economic and industry conditions that affect consumer spending, changing consumer demands, the timing of the Company’s introduction of new products, the level of consumer acceptance of each new product, the seasonality of the markets in which the Company participates, the weather and actions of competitors. Accordingly, a comparison of the Company’s results of operations from period to period is not necessarily meaningful, and the Company’s results of operations for any period are not necessarily indicative of future performance.

     Closely Controlled Stock. At October 30, 2003, Norbert Olberz, the Company’s founder, Chairman Emeritus, director and principal stockholder, owned approximately 66% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock. Mr. Olberz effectively has the ability to control the outcome on all matters requiring stockholder approval, including, but not limited to, the election and removal of directors, and

14

Table of Contents

any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, and to control the Company’s management and affairs.

     Information Systems are Vulnerable. The Company’s success, in particular the Company’s ability to successfully manage inventory levels and its centralized distribution system, largely depends upon the efficient operation of the Company’s computer hardware and software systems. The Company uses information systems to track inventory information at the store level, replenish inventory from the Company’s warehouse, and aggregate daily sales information among other things. These systems and the Company’s operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from:

	•		earthquake, fire, flood and other natural disasters;
	•		power loss, computer systems failures, internet and telecommunications or data network failure, operator negligence, improper operation by or supervision of employees, physical and electronic loss of data and similar events; and
	•		computer viruses, penetration by hackers seeking to disrupt operations or misappropriate information and other breaches of security.

     The Company seeks to minimize these risks by the use of backup facilities and redundant systems. Nevertheless any failure that causes an interruption in the Company’s operations or a decrease in inventory tracking could result in reduced net sales.

     Anticipating Consumer Tastes. If the Company fails to anticipate changes in consumer preferences, it may experience lower net sales, higher inventory markdowns and lower margins. Products must appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty. These preferences are also subject to change. Sporting goods are often subject to short-lived trends, such as the short-lived popularity of in-line scooters. Outdoor wear is significantly influenced by fashion. The Company’s success depends upon the ability to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to trends in sporting goods merchandise and consumers’ participation in sports. Failure to identify and respond to these changes may cause net sales to decline. In addition, because the Company generally makes commitments to purchase products from vendors up to six months in advance of the proposed delivery, misjudging the market may over-stock unpopular products and force inventory markdowns that could have a negative impact on profitability, or have insufficient inventory of a popular item that can be sold at full markup.

     Stock Price. The Company’s Common Stock is thinly traded making it difficult to sell large amounts. The market price of the Company’s Common Stock is likely to be volatile and could be subject to significant fluctuations in response to factors such as quarterly variations in operating results, operating results which vary from the expectations of securities analyst and investors, changes in financial estimates, changes in market valuations of competitors, announcements by the Company or its competitors of a material nature, additions or departures of key personnel, future sales of Common Stock and stock volume fluctuations. Also, general political and economic conditions such as a recession or interest rate fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s Common Stock.

15

Table of Contents

     Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk consists primarily of borrowings under its credit facility, which bears interest at floating rates (primarily LIBOR rates). The impact on earnings or cash flows during the next fiscal year from a change of 100 basis points in the interest rate would not be significant.

     Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

     The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, with the participation of the Company’s management, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in making known to them material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in this report.

     Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity’s disclosure objectives. The likelihood of achieving such objections is affected by limitations inherent in disclosure controls and procedures. These include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors or mistakes or intentional circumvention of the established process.

     There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, known to the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

16

Table of Contents

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION

     Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

     The Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business. Management does not believe that any of these legal proceedings will have a material adverse impact on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company, either due to the nature of the claims, or because management believes that such claims should not exceed the limits of the Company’s insurance coverage.

     Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

     Not Applicable

     Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

     Not Applicable

     Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

     At the annual meeting of stockholders on August 1, 2003, the two Class 2 directors, John Attwood and Craig Levra, were re-elected to the Company’s Board of Directors. There were 6,548,577, and 6,452,212 votes for and 18,825, and 115,490 votes withheld, respectively, for each of John Attwood and Craig Levra. The Company’s Class 1 directors, Al McCready, Eric Olberz and Fredrick Schneider, and Class 3 directors, Norbert Olberz and Kenneth Olsen, continue to serve on the Board. The terms of the Class 1, 2 and 3 directors presently expire at the annual meeting of stockholders in 2005, 2006 and 2004, respectively.

17

Table of Contents

     Item 5. Other Information.

Stockholder Proposals

     Under certain circumstances, stockholders are entitled to present proposals at stockholder’s meetings. Any such proposal to be included in the proxy statement for the Company’s 2004 annual meeting of stockholders must be submitted by a stockholder prior to February 22, 2004 in a form that complies with applicable regulations. In the event a stockholder proposal is not submitted to the Company prior to May 7, 2004, the proxies solicited by the Board of Directors for the 2004 annual meeting of the stockholders will confer authority on the holders of the proxy to vote the shares in accordance with their best judgment and discretion if the proposal is presented at the 2004 annual meeting of stockholders without any discussion of the proposal in the proxy statement for such meeting.

     Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a)

Exhibits:

	(b)		Reports on Form 8-K:
			None

18

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

19