Back to GetFilings.com




1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(MARK ONE)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [FEE REQUIRED]

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1997

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 [NO FEE REQUIRED]

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO ___________.

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-20792

FRESH CHOICE, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

DELAWARE 77-0130849
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)

2901 TASMAN DRIVE - SUITE 109, SANTA CLARA, CA 95054-1169
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)

REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (408) 986-8661

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: NONE

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE
(TITLE OF CLASS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definite proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K

Approximate aggregate market value of the registrant's Common Stock held by
nonaffiliates of the registrant (based on the closing sales price of such stock
as reported in the Nasdaq National Market) on February 27, 1998 was $10,745,134.
Excludes shares of Common Stock held by directors, officers and each person who
holds 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock at February 27, 1998 because
such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This exclusion is not a conclusive
determination of such status for other purposes.

Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of February
27, 1998 was 5,682,193.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE



Documents Form 10-K Reference
--------- -------------------


(1) Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders scheduled for May 21, 1998 Part III



2
FRESH CHOICE, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K


TABLE OF CONTENTS



Page
No.


PART I...............................................................................3

Item 1. BUSINESS.....................................................................3
Item 2. PROPERTIES..................................................................14
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS...........................................................14
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.........................15

PART II..............................................................................15

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS........................................................15
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA....................................................16
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS........................................16
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA................................26
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE........................................26

PART III.............................................................................27

Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.........................27
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.....................................................27
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.............27
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS 27

PART IV..............................................................................28

Item 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K...........28

SIGNATURES...........................................................................48

INDEX TO FORM 10-K EXHIBITS..........................................................49

FORM 10-K EXHIBITS



2
3
PART I


Certain statements set forth in or incorporated by reference into this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, including anticipated store openings, planned
capital expenditures and trends in or expectations regarding the Company's
operations, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based on
currently available operating, financial and competitive information and are
subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual future results and trends may
differ materially depending on a variety of factors as set forth under the
heading "Business - Business Risks". In particular, the Company's plans to open
new restaurants could be affected by the Company's ability to locate suitable
restaurant sites, construct new restaurants in a timely manner and obtain
additional financing.


ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

As of February 27, 1998, the Company operated 53 restaurants in California
(43), the state of Washington (5) and Texas (5) under the names "Fresh Choice"
and "Zoopa." Fresh Choice and Zoopa restaurants feature an extensive selection
of healthy, high-quality, freshly-made specialty and traditional salads, hot
pasta, hot baked potatoes, soups, fresh breads and muffins, frozen yogurt and
other desserts, offered in a limited-service format. The Company's goal is to
create a distinctive dining experience that combines the selection, quality and
ambiance of full-service, casual restaurants with the convenience and value
appeal of traditional buffet restaurants.

The restaurants use only fresh produce and high-quality ingredients in its
menu offerings. Fresh produce is delivered a minimum of four days per week to
each restaurant, and all menu items are prepared on-site daily. To reinforce the
Company's commitment to freshness, many of the Company's food offerings are
prepared in exhibition-style cooking areas throughout the day. Guests make their
selections at various arcades including a salad arcade, a soup, baked potato and
hot pasta arcade, a muffin, breads and bakery goods arcade, and a fresh fruit,
frozen yogurt and specialty dessert arcade.

The Company believes that it provides its guests an excellent price/value
relationship by offering unlimited servings for a current fixed price of $5.99
to $6.19 at weekday lunch and $7.39 to $7.49 at dinner, plus the cost of a
beverage. The Company's wide variety of high-quality food and attractive prices
are designed to appeal to a broad range of guests, including families, business
professionals, students and senior citizens. In addition, the Company believes
the concept appeals to health-conscious diners who are focused on the
nutritional content of their meals.

The Company views its commitment to its employees or crewmembers as
critical to its long-term success. The Company depends on a high rate of repeat
business, and views the quality of its crewmember interaction with guests as an
important element of its strategy. By providing extensive training and
competitive compensation, the Company seeks to foster a strong corporate culture
and encourage a sense of personal commitment from crewmembers at all levels. The
Company believes that its strong culture helps it attract and retain
highly-motivated crewmembers who provide its guests with a level of service
superior to that traditionally associated with self-service restaurants.

The Company acquired the Zoopa trade name and three Zoopa restaurants and
opened an additional two new Zoopa restaurants during fiscal 1997, and has plans
to open additional restaurants in fiscal 1998. The Company has generally
attempted to cluster its restaurants in each market area to benefit from
operating and advertising efficiencies, enhance brand-name recognition, and
discourage competition.


3
4
In December 1992, the Company completed an underwritten initial public
offering of 1,112,500 shares of its Common Stock, with net offering proceeds of
$12,719,000. Stockholders of the Company sold 612,500 shares in this offering.

In July 1993, the Company sold 850,000 shares of its Common Stock in an
underwritten public offering, with net proceeds to the Company of $19,609,000.
Stockholders of the Company sold 525,000 shares in the same offering.

In December 1995, after an analysis of the sales potential and operating
economics of every restaurant in the chain, the Company announced a $23.9
million restructuring plan. The plan called for closing as many as ten of the
Company's restaurants and for a partial write-down of assets to estimated fair
value in other restaurants. The Company has closed or sold 11 restaurants to
date, including three restaurants in 1995 and an additional eight in 1996.

In September, 1996 the Company sold 1,187,906 shares of its Series B
Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock to Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited
Partnership ("Crescent") for $4.63 per share receiving net proceeds of
approximately $5,175,000 in a private offering. Crescent and/or its assignees
also has an option to purchase up to 593,953 shares of Series C Non-Voting
Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $6.00 per share during a period of
three years.

The Company was incorporated in California on October 20, 1986 under the
name Gourmet California, Inc. In August 1988, the Company was recapitalized as a
result of a merger with Moffett Partners, Inc., and the survivor of the merger
was re-named Fresh Choice, Inc. Effective December 4, 1992, the Company was
reincorporated in Delaware. Unless the context otherwise requires, all
references to the "Company" or "Fresh Choice" mean Fresh Choice, Inc. and its
predecessors.


STRATEGY

The Company's objective is to create a distinctive dining experience that
combines the selection, quality and ambiance of full-service, casual dining
restaurants with the convenience and value appeal of traditional buffet
restaurants. Each element of the Company's strategy is designed to exceed
guests' expectations, encourage repeat business, and establish a significant
presence in each of its targeted markets. The key elements of the Company's
strategy include the following:

Fresh, Healthy, High-Quality Food. The Company is committed to using only
fresh produce and high-quality ingredients in its menu offerings. Fresh produce
is delivered a minimum of four days per week to each restaurant, and all menu
items are prepared on-site daily. To reinforce the Company's commitment to
freshness, many of the Company's food offerings are prepared in separate
exhibition-style cooking areas throughout the day. The Company maintains
stringent quality standards in identifying, purchasing and preparing fresh food
and ingredients.

Extensive Food Selection. The restaurant's broad selection of food
offerings is designed to appeal to a wide range of guests. Each restaurant
features a selection of specialty salads daily, prepared from recipes developed
by the Company, as well as salad ingredients and a variety of dressings that
allow guests to create their own salads. Each restaurant also offers a selection
of freshly-prepared soups, hot Sizzlin' Pan pasta dishes, hot breads, muffins
and other bakery goods, baked potatoes, fruits, frozen yogurt and other
desserts.

Excellent Price/Value Relationship. The Company believes its pricing
strategy for unlimited servings offers an excellent price/value alternative to
other casual dining restaurants. Discounts are provided for young children and
senior citizens through the Company's Master Club(TM).


4
5
Commitment to Guest Service. The Company is committed to providing its
guests with a level of service superior to that traditionally associated with
limited-service restaurants. The Company devotes substantial attention and
resources to maintaining the cleanliness and consistent high-quality
presentation of the salad bar and other exhibition cooking areas in order to
enhance the visual appeal of the Company's offerings. Fresh Choice depends upon
a high rate of repeat business, and views the quality of its crewmember
interaction with guests as critical to its long-term success. By providing
extensive training and competitive compensation, the Company believes it fosters
a strong corporate culture and encourages a sense of personal commitment from
crewmembers at all levels.

Distinctive Design and Decor and Casual Atmosphere. The Company devotes
significant resources to the design and decor of its restaurants. The
restaurants have a flexible design which can accommodate a variety of available
sites. The Company's new restaurant design and decor incorporated into its new
Zoopa restaurants and the current Fresh Choice restaurants remodel plan, uses an
interior design that is in the style of an open-air international marketplace,
like a farmer's market. The food is displayed in colorful arcades with fun and
distinctive signage segregating each arcade section.

Restaurant Locations. The Company's site selection strategy is generally
to cluster its restaurants in each of its target markets in order to realize
operating and marketing efficiencies, enhance brand-name recognition, and
discourage competition.


RESTAURANT ECONOMICS

For the 52 weeks ended December 28, 1997, the 48 restaurants open
throughout the entire period generated average net sales of approximately
$1,439,000 and average cash flow, after occupancy expenses, of approximately
$179,000 or 12.5% of net sales. During fiscal 1997, the Company opened two Zoopa
restaurants in Texas at an average cash cost of $1,275,000, not including
pre-opening expenses.


CONCEPT AND MENU

Each Fresh Choice and Zoopa restaurant features a salad bar offering
signature specialty tossed and prepared salads with an extensive choice of salad
ingredients and dressings. All specialty tossed salads and specialty prepared
salads are clearly marked, and low-fat and fat-free items are prominently
identified. Throughout the day several crewmembers maintain the salad bar and
replenish individual salads and ingredients from the opposite side of the salad
bar, minimizing interference with guests. Separate exhibition-style arcades
offer fresh soups, hot pasta dishes, baked potatoes, hot breads, muffins and
other bakery goods, fresh fruits, frozen yogurt and other desserts. During peak
hours, each guest is escorted to his or her table. Each guest may obtain
unlimited refills of all food dishes, soft drinks, lemonade, coffee and tea. The
Company is also actively improving the aesthetic appeal of its restaurants by
enhancing the merchandising of many of the fresh products used daily in the
arcades to create a more inviting, warm, and visually abundant atmosphere.

The Company has developed proprietary recipes for a broad assortment of
specialty salads, soups, pasta sauces, and muffins. In each product category,
the restaurants offer several standard dishes daily, and rotates additional
offerings to provide variety for the Company's many repeat guests. Each category
also contains daily offerings that are particularly low in fat. Because the
restaurants utilize a broad variety of produce and other ingredients in its
dishes and is not overly dependent on any individual recipe, it is able to
substitute dishes and ingredients in the event that weather conditions or supply
factors lead to high prices or shortages of particular produce items or other
ingredients. The Company believes that the flexibility of its menu allows it to
accommodate regional tastes.


5
6
Salads. The restaurants offer signature specialty tossed salads and
specialty prepared salads, each of which is made from recipes created by the
Company, and salads made by the guest from a broad assortment of salad
ingredients. The salad bar in each restaurant features specialty tossed salads
that are prepared exhibition-style and are rotated frequently.

Each day the salad bar features a selection of specialty prepared salads
from among the Company's more than 50 recipes. The Company's salad bar also
offers more than 40 salad ingredients and toppings, allowing guests to create
their own salad. The ingredients include various types of lettuce and a broad
assortment of vegetables, cheeses, and other toppings. The Company offers 10
dressings and a selection of gourmet oils and vinegars.

Soups. The restaurants offer a variety of soups daily selected from among
its more than 30 soup recipes. All soups are prepared on-site utilizing fresh
produce and other high-quality ingredients, and include low-fat and non-fat
selections.

Pasta. The restaurants offer Sizzlin' Pan Pasta, a line of pan-sauteed
pasta recipes prepared for guests continually throughout the day. Recipes
feature high-quality pastas, sauteed in olive oil, garlic, and white wine with
fresh herbs, vegetables, and meats. Individual pastas and sauces are still
offered on a daily basis, in addition to Sizzlin' Pan Pasta dishes.

Muffins and Breads. The restaurants offer a variety of muffins daily,
including a low-fat muffin, selected from among its more than 30 muffin recipes.
All muffins are baked in the exhibition bakery area and are replenished
frequently to ensure warmth and freshness. The restaurants also offer a variety
of freshly-baked breads, including sourdough french bread, harvest bread and
herbed bread sticks.

Desserts. The restaurants offer an assortment of desserts, including fresh
fruits, bread pudding, tapioca, chocolate pudding, frozen yogurt, fruit
cobblers, and a triple chocolate decadence brownie.

Beverages. The restaurants offer an assortment of fruit juices, fresh
lemonades and flavored iced teas. Fresh Choice also offers sodas and sparkling
waters, and in most restaurants, beer and wine. Refills of juices, lemonade,
soft drinks, coffee and tea are provided at no extra cost.


GUEST SERVICE

The Company is committed to providing a superior level of service in order
to distinguish itself from traditional self-service restaurants. During peak
hours, guests are escorted from the salad bar to a table. Crewmembers are in the
dining area during meal hours to provide follow-on beverage service, to clean
and bus tables, and to attend to other guest needs.

The Company devotes substantial attention and resources to maintaining the
cleanliness and consistent high-quality presentation of the salad bar and other
exhibition cooking areas in order to enhance the visual appeal of the Company's
food offerings. The restaurant's crewmembers are present behind the salad bar
and in the exhibition cooking areas to replenish and replace food offerings, to
answer guest questions, and to assist guests in serving themselves. All
personnel in each restaurant are required to maintain a high standard of dress
and grooming.

The Company actively solicits guest input through the use of comment cards
prominently displayed in several areas in each restaurant, and attempts to
respond in writing to all guest complaints and suggestions.


6
7
RESTAURANT DESIGN

The Company's restaurants employ a 60-foot salad bar, with the cash
registers placed at the end of the salad bar in most of the restaurants before
the guest has access to the other food service areas. A few of the Company's
restaurants, including its new Zoopa restaurants, have been designed so that the
cash registers are positioned toward the front of the restaurant to provide
guests with direct access to the various food service areas. The Company opened
two new Zoopa restaurants in Texas in December, 1997. These restaurants
incorporate an open, colorful, fun, brighter, more inviting decor package and a
more efficient layout. The new decor has been incorporated into the Company's
ongoing remodel plans.

The Company's restaurants typically range from 5,500 to 7,400 square feet,
seating from 160 to 240 guests. Many of the Company's restaurants provide
limited outdoor seating. The flexible design of the restaurants enables the
Company to take advantage of a broad range of available sites.


REMODELING

Remodeling is an integral part of the Company's strategic plan.
Restaurants typically require remodeling every five to seven years. The Company
has incorporated many of the design elements of its new Zoopa restaurants into
its remodeling plans for 1998. Ten to thirteen restaurants are scheduled to be
remodeled in 1998 at an expected total cost of approximately $2,000,000. Future
remodel plans will be developed based upon an evaluation of the results of these
remodels.


SITE SELECTION

To date, the Company has located its restaurants in regional malls, strip
centers and freestanding locations. The Company considers the location of each
restaurant to be critical to its long-term success, and management devotes
significant effort to the investigation and evaluation of potential sites. The
site selection process focuses on market area demographics, target population
density, household income levels and daytime traffic patterns, as well as
specific site characteristics such as visibility, accessibility, traffic volume,
and the availability of adequate parking. The Company also reviews potential
competition and guest activity at other restaurants operating in the area. The
Company believes that its flexibility in utilizing its different restaurant
layouts gives it a competitive advantage in selecting sites. The Company
requires approximately six to twelve months after identifying a site to complete
negotiation of a lease and construct and open a new restaurant. While the
Company currently leases most of its restaurant sites and expects to lease
virtually all of its sites in the future, it may purchase one or more sites for
construction of new restaurants if available on acceptable financial terms.
Currently, the Company owns land and buildings at two of its restaurant sites
and owns buildings on leased land at seven others.


EXPANSION STRATEGY

The Company opened two new Zoopa restaurants in December, 1997 in San
Antonio and Houston, Texas and currently intends to open four to six additional
restaurants in fiscal 1998. The Company's current expansion strategy is to fill
in the Seattle, Washington market and to continue expansion in Texas, and then
to expand its operations to other markets outside of California. In addition,
the Company frequently reviews the operating performance and profitability of
its restaurants, and to the extent they do not meet expectations for operating
performance, restaurants will be evaluated for possible closure.

By clustering restaurants, the Company seeks to benefit from advertising
and operating efficiencies. In addition, clustering allows the Company to
capture more of the available guest base and


7
8
to discourage competition. To the extent that the Company continues to open new
restaurants in clusters outside of its existing Northern California markets, the
Company expects that these restaurants may benefit from certain volume
purchasing discounts and operating efficiencies generally applicable to its
Northern California restaurants.

The Company currently leases most of its existing restaurants, and has no
plans to offer franchises or to begin purchasing rather than leasing its
restaurant sites on a regular basis.

There can be no assurance that the restaurants will be successful outside
the Company's existing Northern California markets, in locations where the
Company has limited operating experience, where the weather is more seasonal, or
where regional tastes and restaurant preferences may be different. In addition,
the Company's ability to implement its expansion strategy will depend upon a
variety of factors, including the selection and availability of suitable
restaurant locations, the construction of new restaurants in a timely manner,
the availability of capital to finance expansion, equipment costs and other
factors, many of which are beyond the Company's control. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be successful in opening the number of
restaurants anticipated, that those restaurants will be opened in a timely
manner, or that, if opened, those restaurants will be operated profitably.


MARKETING AND PROMOTION

The Company's marketing strategy in its existing markets is to increase
unaided brand recall toward building top-of-mind awareness of the Fresh Choice
or Zoopa brand resulting in increased usage among targeted consumers.

The Company intends to utilize a high impact, high image creative message
placed consistently in broad-reaching advertising mediums such as outdoor
boards, transit stops and bus boards. In addition, the Company intends to
continue to use targeted direct mail throughout the year. These tactics are
designed to leverage both the high level of aided awareness that has been
achieved by the brand and build an identifiable perception of Fresh Choice or
Zoopa in the mind of the consumer. Additionally, by consistently providing a
positive dining experience, the Company believes it benefits from significant
word-of-mouth advertising.

In new markets, the marketing strategy is to build brand name awareness
where no or very low awareness exists. The Company intends to accomplish this
through the use of appropriate local advertising mediums and creative messages.
Prior to opening each new restaurant, the Company typically sponsors
fund-raisers and pre-opening parties in the restaurant with local charities or
schools to build community relationships and attract customers to the
restaurant.


RESTAURANT OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT

Management and Crewmembers. The Company has endeavored to establish a
strong corporate identity and culture and to maintain quality and consistency in
its restaurants through the careful training of personnel and the establishment
of rigorous standards relating to food purchasing and preparation and
maintenance of the serving areas and facilities. Responsibility for managing the
Company's restaurant operations is currently shared by eight regional managers,
who report to the President and CEO. Regional managers are generally responsible
for five to eight restaurants.

The management staff of a typical Fresh Choice restaurant consists of one
general manager, two or three restaurant managers and one to two shift
supervisors. The Company externally recruits most of its restaurant managers,
virtually all of whom have prior restaurant management experience. All of the
Company's current general managers have been promoted from restaurant managers.
All newly-hired assistant managers participate in the Company's training course.
Each restaurant also employs


8
9
approximately 40 hourly crewmembers, many of whom work part-time. The general
manager of each restaurant is responsible for the day-to-day operation and
profitability of the restaurant. To enhance quality, service, cleanliness,
maintenance and safety, the Company has developed detailed systems, procedures
and controls with respect to labor and food cost standards, food preparation,
planning and scheduling. The Company's culture emphasizes a sense of ownership
and entrepreneurship. The Company maintains a variety of programs to reward
excellent service and performance by each crewmember at the restaurant level. In
addition to a competitive base salary, the Company has an incentive plan that
rewards restaurant managers based upon restaurant operating performance.

Food Purchasing. The Company has designed systems for determining order
quantities and has developed preparation methods that together ensure freshness,
maximize usage and minimize waste. Most food items are purchased on a
centralized basis to ensure uniform quality and adequate supplies, and to obtain
competitive prices. To the extent possible, the Company purchases pursuant to
fixed-price, long-term contracts that are not subject to minimum quantity
requirements. All produce is purchased from sources that have been pre-qualified
to meet the Company's specifications. Produce is delivered directly to
individual restaurants. At each restaurant, the management team is responsible
for assuring that all deliveries meet the Company's guidelines regarding
freshness and quality. The Company believes alternate sources are available for
all products.

Recipe Development. The Company's food development efforts focus on
introducing compelling and innovative new recipes, as well as upgrading the
flavor profiles and presentation standards of existing recipe favorites.

The Company works with outside consultants on food and beverage market
research and consumer trends. Seasonal and upscale produce items are rotated
into the salad bar product mix to continue to have "the best salad bar in the
business".

Training and Support. The Company believes that its training programs have
been successful in developing commitment to the Company, a consistent level of
execution, and high-quality guest service. Upon joining Fresh Choice, each
restaurant manager participates in a training course covering restaurant
operations before assuming management responsibility. In addition, the Company
creates and facilitates management and hourly crewmember workshops that apply to
and support the Company's current goals and objectives.

Information Systems. Each restaurant is equipped with a computer
containing programs to perform crewmember timekeeping and daily cash and sales
reporting. The automation of these important administrative responsibilities
reduces the time spent by restaurant managers preparing daily reports of cash,
deposits, sales, sales mix and guest counts, labor costs, and food waste. The
computer systems at each restaurant are polled nightly by the corporate computer
system for this information, which is then processed by the centralized cash and
sales database. Reports are run and distributed automatically to regional
managers each morning as well as compiled for executive management review.
Payroll information is processed every two weeks at the restaurants and
transmitted electronically to the corporate office, where the information is
interfaced with the Company's outside payroll service.

Financial controls are maintained centrally through a computerized
accounting system at the Company's corporate office. Sales are posted
electronically to the general ledger from the central cash and sales database.
Profit and loss statements are compiled every four weeks by the accounting
department and provided to the general managers and regional managers for
analysis and comparison to the Company's budgets.

Hours of Restaurant Operation. Most of the Company's restaurants are open
seven days a week, typically from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday through
Thursday, and from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays.


9
10
COMPETITION

The Company's restaurants compete with the rapidly growing mid-price,
full-service casual dining segment; with traditional self-service buffet, soup,
and salad restaurants; and, increasingly, with quick-service outlets. The
Company's competitors include national and regional chains, as well as local
owner-operated restaurants. Key competitive factors in the industry are the
quality and value of the food products offered, quality and speed of service,
price, dining experience, restaurant location and the ambiance of facilities.
The Company believes that it competes favorably with respect to these factors,
although many of the Company's competitors have been in existence longer than
the Company, have a more established market presence, and have substantially
greater financial, marketing and other resources than the Company, which may
give them certain competitive advantages. The Company believes that its ability
to compete effectively will continue to depend in large measure upon its ability
to offer a diverse selection of high-quality, fresh food products with an
attractive price/value relationship.


GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Each of the Company's restaurants is subject to various federal, state and
local laws, regulations and administrative practices affecting its business, and
must comply with provisions regulating health and sanitation standards, equal
employment, minimum wages and licensing for the sale of food and alcoholic
beverages. Difficulties or failures in obtaining or maintaining required beer
and wine licenses or other required licenses or approvals could delay or prevent
the opening of new restaurants or adversely affect the operations of existing
restaurants. The Company has no reason to believe that any of such future
license applications would not be approved.


TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS

"Fresh Choice," "Zoopa" and "The Ultimate Soup & Salad Bar" are registered
marks of the Company and the "Fresh Choice Masters Club" is pending with the
United States Patent and Trademark Office. The Company is also pursuing federal
registration of its logo. The Company's policy is to strenuously police the use
of its marks and to oppose infringement of its marks.


EMPLOYEES

As of February 27, 1998, the Company had approximately 2,400 employees or
crewmembers. These included approximately 2,200 hourly restaurant crewmembers,
of whom approximately 1,800 were part-time crewmembers, approximately 170
full-time restaurant managers and approximately 44 full-time corporate
management and staff. None of the Company's crewmembers is represented by a
labor union. The Company believes that its employee relations are excellent.


10
11
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The executive officers of the Company as of March 14, 1998 are as follows:



NAME AGE POSITION
---- --- --------


Everett F. Jefferson 59 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

David E. Pertl 45 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Tim G. O'Shea 50 Vice President, Marketing

Joan M. Miller 46 Vice President, Human Resources

Tina E. Freedman 37 Vice President, Product Development and Purchasing



Mr. Jefferson was elected President and Chief Executive Officer and as a
director of the Company in February 1997. Mr. Jefferson has an extensive
background in restaurant operations. From June 1996 to February 1997 Mr.
Jefferson was an independent consultant. From June 1993 to June 1996 Mr.
Jefferson was President and Chief Executive Officer of Cucina Holding, Inc., the
operator of Java City coffee and bakery. From March 1990 to June 1993 he was an
independent consultant and independent restaurant operator. From May 1987 to
March 1990 he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Skipper's, Inc.. From
May 1986 to April 1987 he was President of Kings Table, Inc. Earlier in his
career Mr. Jefferson was Senior Vice President of operations for Pizza Hut, Inc.
for five years and Regional Director of the Southeast and Caribbean for Saga
Corporation for ten years.

Mr. Pertl joined Fresh Choice in January 1997 as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Mr. Pertl was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Summit Family Restaurants, Inc., a publicly-held family style restaurant company
from September 1989 until July 1996, when Summit was acquired. From September
1977 to September 1989 he held various financial positions with Ponderosa, Inc.,
including Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from January 1987 to
September 1989.

Mr. O'Shea joined Fresh Choice in March 1996 as Vice President, Marketing.
From July 1991 to March 1996 he was Vice President, Marketing for retail and
foodservice products for W.R. Grace and Co., a food processor. Mr. O'Shea has
over 25 years of experience in restaurant management and marketing including
positions as Vice President of Foodservice Marketing for Culinary Brands, Inc.
from January 1987 to June 1991 and Vice President and General Manager of the
hotel foodservices division of Saga Corporation from October 1975 to January
1987.

Ms. Miller joined Fresh Choice in June, 1995 as Vice President, Human
Resources. From March 1992 to March 1995 she was Vice President, Human Resources
for Medallion Mortgage Co., a mortgage banking company. From March 1990 to March
1992 she was an associate with Littler Mendelson Fastiff Tichy & Mathiason,
specializing in labor law.

Ms. Freedman joined Fresh Choice in May 1992 as a restaurant manager and
was named Vice President, Product Development and Purchasing in August 1996, and
elected as an executive officer in March 1997. Ms. Freedman has held various
positions at Fresh Choice, including Director of Product Development from April
1995 to August 1996, Director of Training from December 1994 to April 1995,
Regional Manager from October 1993 to December 1994, and General Manager from
September 1992 to October 1993. From September 1982 to May 1992 she was Director
of Food Services for Macy's, California, a retail/restaurant company.


11
12
BUSINESS RISKS

Certain characteristics and dynamics of the Company's business and of
financial markets in general create risks to the Company's long-term success and
to predictable financial results. These risks include:

Recent Operating Losses and Declines in Comparable Store Sales. The
Company's profitability began to decline in the second half of 1994. In the
fourth quarter of 1994, the Company reported its first operating loss, and
reported operating losses in both 1995 and 1996. The Company reported a modest
profit of $333,000 in 1997.

Beginning late in the third quarter of fiscal 1994, the Company began
reporting comparable store sales declines. Comparable store sales have continued
to decline in each quarter through the end of 1997. The Company reported
comparable store sales declines of 4.6%, 15.3%, 5.9% and 2.7% for fiscal years
1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997 respectively. There can be no assurance that
comparable store sales will improve or that the Company will return to long-term
profitability.

Expansion. The Company experienced substantial growth prior to mid-1995,
having opened 14 restaurants in 1993, 15 restaurants in 1994, and seven in 1995.
In 1995, the Company suspended its expansion plans after opening seven
restaurants, reviewed the operating performance of all of its restaurants, and
identified certain restaurants which did not meet its expectations for operating
performance. As a result, in December 1995 the Company announced a restructuring
plan to close as many as ten restaurants. The Company has closed or sold eleven
restaurants to date, including three at the end of 1995, and eight in 1996. The
Company has identified no further restaurants for closure. The Company opened
one Fresh Choice restaurant in 1996 and in 1997, acquired the Zoopa trade name
and three Zoopa restaurants and opened an additional two new Zoopa restaurants.
The Company believes its growth depends to a significant degree on its ability
to open new restaurants and to operate such restaurants profitably. While the
Company intends to continue its expansion, assuming its financial performance
continues to improve, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
continue expansion. The Company's ability to implement successfully its
expansion strategy will depend on a variety of factors, including the selection
and availability of affordable sites, the selection and availability of capital
to finance restaurant expansion and equipment costs, the ability to hire and
train qualified management and personnel, the ability to control food and other
operating costs, and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company's
control.

On a long-term basis, the Company intends to expand its operations in
markets outside of California, assuming its financial performance continues to
improve. The Company's expansion plans may include entering new geographic
regions in which the Company has no previous operating experience. There can be
no assurance that the concept will be successful in regions outside of
California, where tastes and restaurant preferences may be different. As of
February 27, 1998, the Company had opened or purchased seven restaurants in
Texas, six restaurants in the state of Washington and three restaurants in the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Of the eleven restaurants closed or sold,
two were in Texas, one was in the state of Washington, five were in California,
and three were in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area (where the Company no
longer operates).

Geographic Concentration. As of February 27, 1998, 43 of the Company's 53
restaurants are located in California, primarily in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Accordingly, the Company is susceptible to fluctuations in its business caused
by adverse economic conditions in this region. In addition, net sales at certain
of the Company's restaurants have been adversely affected when a new Company
restaurant has been opened in relatively close geographic proximity, and such
pressure may continue to depress annual comparable store sales. There can be no
assurance that expansion within existing or future geographic markets will not
adversely affect the individual financial performance of Company restaurants in
such markets or the Company's overall results of operations. In addition, given
the Company's present geographic concentration in Northern California, adverse
weather conditions in the


12
13
region or negative publicity relating to an individual Company restaurant could
have a more pronounced adverse affect on net sales than if the Company's
restaurants were more broadly dispersed.

Volatility of Stock Price. The market price of the Company's Common Stock
has fluctuated substantially since the initial public offering of the Common
Stock in December 1992. Changes in general conditions in the economy, the
financial markets or the restaurant industry, natural disasters or other
developments affecting the Company or its competitors could cause the market
price of the Company's Common Stock to fluctuate substantially. In addition, in
recent years the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations. This volatility has had significant effect on the market prices of
securities issued by many companies, including the Company, for reasons
sometimes unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. Any
shortfall in the Company's net sales or earnings from levels expected by
securities analysts could have an immediate and significant adverse effect on
the trading price of the Company's Common Stock in any given period.
Additionally, such shortfalls may not become apparent until late in the fiscal
quarter, which could result in an even more immediate and significant adverse
effect on the trading price of the Company's Common Stock.

Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations. The Company's restaurants have
typically experienced seasonal fluctuations, as a disproportionate amount of net
sales and net income are generally realized in the second and third fiscal
quarters. In addition, the Company's quarterly results of operations have been,
and may continue to be, materially impacted by the timing of new restaurant
openings and restaurant closings. The fourth quarter normally includes 16 weeks
of operations as compared with 12 weeks for each of the three prior quarters. As
a result of these factors, net sales and net income in the fourth quarter are
not comparable to results in each of the first three fiscal quarters, and net
sales and net income can be expected to decline in the first quarter of each
fiscal year in comparison to the fourth quarter of the prior fiscal year.
Comparable store sales, which have been negative for four consecutive years, may
continue to be negative.

Dependence on Key Personnel. The success of the Company depends on the
efforts of key management personnel. The Company's success will depend on its
ability to motivate and retain its key crewmembers and to attract qualified
personnel, particularly general managers, for its restaurants. The Company faces
significant competition in the recruitment of qualified crewmembers.

Restaurant Industry. The restaurant industry is affected by changes in
consumer tastes, as well as national, regional and local economic conditions and
demographic trends. The performance of individual restaurants, including the
Company's restaurants, may be affected by factors such as traffic patterns,
demographic considerations, and the type, number and location of competing
restaurants. In addition, factors such as inflation, increased food, labor and
crewmember benefit costs, and the availability of experienced management and
hourly crewmembers may also adversely affect the restaurant industry in general
and the Company's restaurants in particular. Restaurant operating costs are
affected by increases in the minimum hourly wage, unemployment tax rates, and
various federal, state and local governmental regulations, including those
relating to the sale of food and alcoholic beverages. There can be no assurance
that the restaurant industry in general, and the Company in particular, will be
successful.

Competition. The Company's restaurants compete with the rapidly growing
mid-price, full-service casual dining segment; with traditional self-service
buffet, soup, and salad restaurants; and, increasingly, with quick-service
outlets. The Company's competitors include national and regional chains, as well
as local owner-operated restaurants. Key competitive factors in the industry are
the quality and value of the food products offered, quality and speed of
service, price, dining experience, restaurant location and the ambiance of
facilities. Many of the Company's competitors have been in existence longer than
the Company, have a more established market presence, and have substantially
greater financial, marketing and other resources than the Company, which may
give them certain competitive advantages. The Company believes that its ability
to compete effectively will continue to


13
14
depend in large measure upon its ability to offer a diverse selection of
high-quality, fresh food products with an attractive price/value relationship.

Ability to Obtain Additional Financing. The Company intends to continue
restaurant expansion, assuming its financial performance continues to improve.
The Company's ability to implement an expansion strategy will depend upon a
variety of factors, including the success of its restructuring plan in restoring
profitability and its ability to obtain funds. The Company believes its
near-term capital requirements can be met through its existing cash balances,
cash provided by operations and its available bank line of credit. However, the
Company may seek additional financing to provide greater flexibility toward
improving its operating performance. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to obtain additional financing when needed on acceptable terms or
at all.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The Company currently owns both the land and buildings at two of its
restaurant locations, and owns restaurant buildings on leased land at seven
other locations. The Company leases all of its other restaurant locations, but
may purchase future restaurant locations where it believes it is cost-effective
to do so. The Company's restaurants are located in regional malls, strip
centers, and freestanding locations.

The Company's restaurants range from 5,500 to 7,400 square feet seating
from 160 to 240 guests. Many of the Company's restaurants provide limited
outdoor seating.

Restaurant locations leased by the Company are typically leased under
"triple net" leases that require the Company to pay real estate taxes,
maintenance costs and insurance premiums and, in many cases, to pay contingent
rentals based on sales in excess of specified amounts. Generally, the leases
have initial terms of ten to twenty years, with options to renew for additional
periods which range from five to fifteen years. All of the Company's current
leases have remaining terms or renewal options extending more than five years
following the date of this report.

The Company currently leases a separate facility for its executive
headquarters pursuant to a lease which expires December 31, 2000. The Company
believes that such facility is adequate for its office space requirements
through fiscal 1998. If additional space is required in the future, the Company
further believes that suitable facilities can be leased on commercially
reasonable terms.


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

On November 13, 1997, the settlement of a class action lawsuit filed in
the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San
Jose division, naming the Company, certain of its directors, and current and
former officers as defendants became final.

The lawsuit had alleged that the defendants misrepresented or failed to
disclose material facts about the Company's operations and financial results,
which the plaintiffs contend resulted in an artificial inflation of the price of
the Company's stock. The suit was purportedly brought on behalf of a class of
purchasers of the Company's stock during the period from July 15, 1993 to
December 15, 1994. On March 20, 1995, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint,
which added as defendants the co-lead underwriters of the Company's initial and
secondary public offerings and three securities analysts employed by the
underwriters. The amended complaint also expanded the alleged class period to
include purchasers of the Company's stock during the period from December 8,
1992, to February 9, 1995. On December 7, 1995, the Court dismissed the amended
complaint, with leave for further amendment. Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended
Complaint on February 27, 1996. This complaint alleged that Fresh Choice and
certain of its current and former officers and directors misrepresented or
failed to disclose material facts about the Company's operations and financial
results during the period from February 15,


14
15
1994 through February 9, 1995, in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

After the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint,
the parties reached an agreement to settle the lawsuit in its entirety. The
Court granted final approval of the settlement in an order filed on October 14,
1997. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the settlement became final 30
days later. The settlement was funded by insurance proceeds. The Company
continues to deny all allegations in the lawsuit.


ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.



PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Stock Information. Fresh Choice, Inc.'s common stock trades on the the
Nasdaq Stock MarketSM under the Symbol: SALD. At February 27, 1998, 5,682,193
shares were owned by 393 stockholders of record. The following are the Company's
common stock high and low closing sales prices for the fiscal years 1996 and
1997:



1996 High Low
---- ---- ---


First Quarter 6 5/8 5 1/2
Second Quarter 8 1/4 6
Third Quarter 7 5/8 6
Fourth Quarter 6 3 1/8




1997 High Low
---- ---- ---


First Quarter 4 1/2 3 3/8
Second Quarter 4 1/8 2 15/16
Third Quarter 3 5/8 3 1/16
Fourth Quarter 5 3/4 3 1/4



Fresh Choice, Inc. had its initial public offering on December 9, 1992 at
a price of $13.00. Fresh Choice, Inc. had a follow-on public offering on July
15, 1993 at a price of $25.00.

The Company has not paid cash dividends on its common stock, and presently
intends to continue this policy in order to retain its earnings for the
development of the Company's business. In addition, the Company's current bank
line of credit prohibits the payment of dividends.

On September 13, 1996, the Company sold to Crescent Real Estate Equities
Ltd. ("Crescent") 1,187,906 shares of Series B Non-Voting Convertible
Participating Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred Stock"), and granted Crescent
an option to purchase 593,953 shares of Series C Non-Voting Convertible


15
16
Participating Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred Stock") (collectively, the
"Stock") for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.5 million, or $4.63
per share of Series B Preferred Stock pursuant to a Preferred Stock Purchase
Agreement dated April 26, 1996. The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible into
Series A Voting Convertible Participating Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred
Stock") at any time at the option of the holder, and the Series A, Series B and
Series C Preferred Stock is convertible into Common Stock at any time at the
option of the holder. The Company offered and sold the Stock to Crescent, a
sophisticated investor who purchased such shares for investment purposes, as
transactions not involving a public offering pursuant to the exemption from
registration provisions of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

A five-year summary of selected financial data follows:




(Dollars in thousands, December 28, December 29, December 31, December 25, December 26,
except per share data) 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------


Net sales $ 72,978 $ 76,691 $ 84,280 $ 76,969 $ 53,633

Operating income (loss) 219 (1,818) (30,321) 4,666 4,642

Net income (loss) 333 (2,001) (27,796) 3,198 3,054

Basic net income (loss) per share 0.06 (0.36) (5.05) 0.59 0.63

Diluted net income (loss) per share 0.05 (0.36) (5.05) 0.58 0.60

Total assets 35,608 37,166 37,306 58,528 52,672

Working capital (deficiency) (3,830) (2,726) (8,912) 2,997 17,160

Long-term debt and capital lease
obligations, including current portion 118 208 615 879 1,306

Stockholders' equity $ 26,318 $ 25,916 $ 22,291 $ 49,336 $ 45,210

Number of restaurants open
at end of year 53 48 55 51 36



ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS

Certain statements set forth in this discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations including anticipated store openings,
planned capital expenditures and trends in or expectations regarding the
Company's operations, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are
based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information
and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual future results and
trends may differ materially depending on a variety of factors as set forth
under the heading "Business - Business Risks". In particular, the Company's
plans to open new restaurants could be affected by the Company's ability to
locate suitable restaurant sites, construct new restaurants in a timely manner
and obtain additional financing.


16
17
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Fresh Choice, Inc. operates limited-service restaurants offering specialty
and traditional salads, hot pasta, hot baked potatoes, soups, breads, muffins,
frozen yogurt and other desserts. The Company operated 53 restaurants at
December 28, 1997, 48 restaurants at December 29, 1996 and 55 restaurants at
December 31, 1995. The Company's fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in
December. Fiscal years 1997 and 1996 each contained 52 weeks whereas fiscal year
1995 contained 53 weeks. The additional week in 1995 did not have a significant
effect on the Company's results of operations.

As of December 28, 1997, the Company had substantially completed a
restructuring plan previously announced at the end of 1995. In connection with
its restructuring plan, the Company closed or sold eleven restaurants, three in
1995 and eight in 1996, and curtailed restaurant expansion. The Company returned
to profitability in 1997, reporting net income of $333,000, after incurring net
losses of $2,001,000 in 1996 and $27,796,000 in 1995 (including a $23,932,000
restructuring and asset impairment charge). The Company also resumed restaurant
expansion in 1997, purchasing three restaurants in the Seattle, Washington
market and building two restaurants in Houston and San Antonio Texas.

After opening its first restaurant in 1986, Fresh Choice expanded
steadily, its early growth driven by the strong unit economics of its
restaurants. The Company operated 22 restaurants at the time of its initial
public offering in December 1992. With $12,719,000 in net proceeds from its
initial offering and an additional $19,609,000 in net proceeds from a secondary
offering in July 1993, the Company accelerated its growth, opening 14 new
restaurants in 1993 (including its first two restaurants outside of California),
15 new restaurants in 1994 (including seven restaurants outside of California),
seven restaurants in 1995 (of which two are located outside of California). The
Company opened a number of locations which did not reach anticipated sales
levels, while at the same time, the Company experienced unanticipated declines
in sales at its restaurants, resulting in part from increased competition in the
casual/family dining sector and greater than expected cannibalization of its
existing restaurants. The Company's profitability began to decline in the second
half of 1994, and the Company reported its first operating loss in the fourth
quarter of 1994. The Company reported an additional operating loss for 1995. In
1995, after an analysis of the sales potential and operating economics of every
Fresh Choice restaurant, the Company finalized and announced a restructuring
plan to help restore profitability. The plan included closing as many as ten of
the Company's restaurants, of which seven restaurants were included in a reserve
for closures, and a partial write-down of assets to estimated fair value for
thirteen other restaurants. The Company recorded a $23.9 million restructuring
charge in 1995 in connection with the plan. At year end 1995, the Company closed
three restaurants.

The Company continued to incur an operating loss for 1996. As of year end
1996, the Company had closed or sold eleven restaurants including the sale of
two restaurants and the closure of a third restaurant in the Washington, D.C.
market.

During 1997 the Company successfully introduced a number of cost control
programs which resulted in the Company reporting a modest profit of $333,000 in
1997. The Company closed no additional restaurants in 1997 and has identified
one restaurant for closure as of February 27, 1998. This restaurant is planned
to close at the expiration of its lease term and its closure is not expected to
have a material impact on the Company's financial position.


17
18
The following table presents the components of average operating income on
a per restaurant basis, based on the average number of restaurants open during
the year:




(Dollars in thousands) 1997 1996 1995
--------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------


NET SALES $ 1,457 100.0 % $ 1,451 100.0 % $ 1,506 100.0 %
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales 389 26.7 % 399 27.5 % 412 27.4 %
Restaurant operating expenses:
Labor 450 30.9 % 470 32.4 % 489 32.5 %
Occupancy and other 440 30.2 % 436 30.0 % 468 31.0 %
Depreciation and amortization 62 4.2 % 63 4.3 % 102 6.8 %
General and administrative expenses 112 7.7 % 134 9.4 % 149 9.9 %
Gain on sale of restaurants -- -- % (8) (0.6)% -- -- %
Restructuring and asset impairment expenses -- -- % (9) (0.6)% 428 28.4 %
------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
Total costs and expenses 1,452 99.7 % 1,485 102.4 % 2,048 136.0 %
------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) $ 4 0.3 % $ (34) (2.4)% $ (542) (36.0)%
=================== ====================== ======================
Average restaurants open 50.1 52.8 56.0
---------- ----------- ------------



The following table sets forth items in the Company's statements of
operations as a percentage of sales:



(Dollars in thousands) 1997 1996 1995
--------------------- --------------------- ---------------------

NET SALES $ 72,978 100.0 % $ 76,691 100.0 % $ 84,280 100.0 %

COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales 19,480 26.7 % 21,107 27.5 % 23,059 27.4 %
Restaurant operating expenses:
Labor 22,566 30.9 % 24,853 32.4 % 27,375 32.5 %
Occupancy and other 22,041 30.2 % 23,021 30.0 % 26,163 31.0 %
Depreciation and amortization 3,082 4.2 % 3,336 4.3 % 5,731 6.8 %
General and administrative expenses 5,590 7.7 % 7,089 9.4 % 8,341 9.9 %
Gain on sale of restaurants -- -- % (446) (0.6)% -- -- %
Restructuring and asset impairment expenses -- -- % (451) (0.6)% 23,932 28.4 %
--------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
Total costs and expenses 72,759 99.7 % 78,509 102.4 % 114,601 136.0 %
--------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 219 0.3 % (1,818) (2.4)% (30,321) (36.0)%
Interest income 166 0.2 % 77 0.1 % 53 0.1 %
Interest expense (52) -- % (260) (0.3)% (183) (0.2)%
--------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
Interest income (expense), net 114 0.2 % (183) (0.2)% (130) (0.1)%
--------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES 333 0.5 % (2,001) (2.6)% (30,451) (36.1)%
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes -- -- % -- -- % (2,655) (3.2)%
--------------------- --------------------- ---------------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 333 0.5 % $ (2,001) (2.6)% $ (27,796) (33.0)%
===================== ===================== =====================



18
19
Net Sales. In 1997, net sales declined $3.7 million, or 4.8%, to $73.0
million. Eight restaurants closed or sold in 1996 accounted for a $5.9 million
decline in sales. Lower guest counts, offset partially by a higher average
check, at the Company's 47 comparable restaurants accounted for an additional
$2.1 million decline in sales. Five new restaurants in 1997 and one new
restaurant in 1996 contributed incremental sales of $4.3 million.

In 1996, net sales declined $7.6 million, or 9.0%, to $76.7 million. Eight
restaurants closed or sold in 1996 and three restaurants closed in 1995
accounted for a $4.5 million decline in sales. Lower guest counts, partially
offset by a higher average check, at the Company's 43 comparable restaurants
accounted for an additional $4.8 million decline in sales. One new restaurant in
1996 and four of the seven new restaurants in 1995 contributed $1.7 million in
incremental sales. In 1996, the Company closed three restaurants opened in 1995.

The Company utilizes an 18-month basis for reporting comparable store
sales which management believes represents a more realistic indication of the
business trends. On this basis, comparable store sales decreased 2.7% in 1997,
5.9% in 1996 and 15.3% in 1995. Guest counts declined 6.8% in 1997, 10.8% in
1996 and 12.0% in 1995.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales (food and beverage costs) were 26.7% in 1997
compared to 27.5% and 27.4% in 1996 and 1995, respectively. The reduction in
food cost as a percentage of sales in 1997 was primarily the result of food
programs implemented in the restaurants which better managed the restaurant
product rotation while maintaining a quality offering to the guest and an
increase in the average check. In 1996, the Company's food program focused on
upgrading the quality of its products, introducing new recipes and upgrading
existing recipes based on market research and consumer trends. Although food
cost per guest increased in 1996, a higher average check following the
introduction of a one-price system and elimination of certain discount programs
offset most of the higher food costs per guest resulting in food costs which
remained approximately flat, as a percentage of sales, with 1995.

Restaurant Operating Expenses. Restaurant operating expenses (labor,
occupancy and other) were 61.1%, 62.4% and 63.5% of net sales in 1997, 1996 and
1995, respectively. A reduction of approximately 1.5% of sales in labor
primarily accounted for the improved relationship of restaurant operating
expenses to net sales in 1997. The reduction resulted from reduced restaurant
level bonus payouts from the Company's 1997 bonus plan, which ties bonus payouts
to achieving planned profit, from improved labor controls, including the
introduction of a revised hourly labor matrix, implemented at the restaurants in
1997 and from a higher average check. In 1996, the relationship of restaurant
operating expenses to net sales improved by approximately 1.0% of sales due to
the absence of non-recurring charges related to the Company's curtailment of
restaurant expansion in 1995 and implementation of its restructuring plan.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses were
4.2% and 4.3% of sales in 1997 and 1996, respectively, compared to 6.8% of sales
in 1995. In both 1997 and 1996, a decline in start-up cost amortization related
to fewer new restaurant openings and a reduction in depreciation from asset
write-offs at eleven closed or sold restaurants and impairment of assets at
other restaurants contributed to the decline in depreciation and amortization
expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses
were 7.7%, 9.4% and 9.9% of sales in 1997, 1996 and 1995, respectively. General
and administrative expenses declined $1,499,000 in 1997 as a result of continued
controls over spending and staffing and the absence of costs related to
strategic consulting and other corporate matters. In 1996, general and
administrative expenses


19
20
declined $1,252,000 as a result of a non-recurring charge of $728,000 in 1995
for executive corporate crewmember severance payments (related to the Company's
change in management and curtailment of its restaurant expansion) and effective
cost controls introduced in 1995 which kept general and administrative expense
in line with the Company's lower sales.

Gain on Sale of Restaurants. In 1996, the Company sold two of its three
restaurants in the Washington, D.C. market and closed the third restaurant which
was previously identified for closure under the 1995 restructuring plan. The
Company received $750,000 for the sale of the two restaurants and recorded a
gain of $446,000. In addition, the Company entered into an agreement not to
compete in the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore markets for a period of four
years. The Company had previously recorded an impairment reserve at each of the
restaurants in connection with the Company's 1995 restructuring plan. The
Company has a reserve for the one closed restaurant for the estimated cash costs
related to the settlement of the lease obligation. The Company assumed
contingent liabilities in connection with assignment agreements on the two sold
restaurants and is currently negotiating a lease settlement with the landlord of
the closed restaurant.

Restructuring and Asset Impairment Expenses. In December 1995, after an
analysis of the sales potential and operating economics of every Fresh Choice
restaurant, the Company finalized and announced a restructuring plan to help
restore profitability. The Company's profitability had declined in the second
half of 1994, and the Company reported its first operating loss in the fourth
quarter of 1994 and additional operating losses for each quarter of 1995.

The restructuring plan announced in December 1995 called for closing as
many as ten of the Company's restaurants, of which seven restaurants were
included in a reserve for closures, and a partial write-down of assets to
estimated fair value for thirteen other restaurants. The Company based its
reserve analysis on SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets to be Disposed Of" which establishes standards to identify and measure
impairment of long-lived assets. Management believes the Company's adoption of
SFAS No. 121 concurrent with the Company's development of a restructuring plan
did not alter the amount or components of the plan and, as a result, the
adoption of the accounting standard did not have a material impact on the
Company's financial position or operations.

In 1995, the Company recorded a $23,932,000 restructuring charge in
connection with the plan which consisted of three parts: (1) an $18,671,000
non-cash impairment charge of which $8,318,000 related to a write-down of assets
to fair market value at the seven restaurants identified for closure and
$10,353,000 related to a write-down to fair market value at 13 other
restaurants, (2) a $4,655,000 charge for estimated cash costs associated with
restaurant closures and settlement of lease obligations, and (3) a $606,000
charge for other costs, both cash and non-cash, primarily for consulting and
other professional services rendered in connection with the Company's
restructuring. Fair value for the write-down of assets at restaurants was
estimated based on the present value of expected future cash flows.

During 1996, the Company closed six of the seven restaurants identified
for closure. The Company decided not to close the seventh restaurant based on
its improved operating performance and reversed $451,000 in 1996 of the
previously recorded restructuring expense which related primarily to anticipated
cash payments to close the restaurant and settle the lease obligation. The
Company reversed an additional $1,618,000 in 1996 of the previously recorded
restructuring expense due primarily to lower than estimated cash payments to
settle lease obligations at five of the six closed restaurants. The Company
attributed the lower than estimated cash payments to better than expected real
estate markets which enabled landlords to locate new tenants for the closed
locations. The Company negotiated cash


20
21
payments to landlords to settle the lease obligations for four of the closed
restaurants, assumed a contingent liability in connection with a sublease
agreement for the fifth closed restaurant, and is negotiating for a lease
settlement with the landlord for the sixth closed restaurant. As of December 28,
1997, the 1995 restructuring reserve balance consisted primarily of the
estimated cash costs to settle the lease obligation on the sixth closed
restaurant. During 1997, the Company reversed an additional $732,000 of the
previously-recorded restructuring expense based on updated estimates of the
costs to resolve the final lease obligation. The Company believes the balance at
December 28, 1997 is adequate to cover the remaining costs to be incurred in
connection with the lease obligation.

During 1996, the Company identified and closed or sold five additional
restaurants for a total of eleven closed restaurants. The Company recorded a
$1,618,000 restructuring charge for two of the restaurants which consisted of
(1) a $650,000 non-cash charge for the write-down of assets to fair market value
at one restaurant that was not previously impaired and (2) a $968,000 charge for
estimated cash costs associated with restaurant closures and settlement of lease
obligations for both restaurants. The Company closed both restaurants during
1996 and reached a settlement with the landlord for the lease obligation for one
restaurant in 1996 and for the other restaurant in 1997. As of December 28,
1997, the Company had no remaining obligations related to the closure of the two
restaurants and reversed $282,000 in 1997 of the previously recorded
restructuring expense due primarily to lower than estimated cash payments to
close the restaurants and settle the lease obligations. The Company closed a
third restaurant in 1996 which did not require a cash settlement with the
landlord for lease obligations. The Company had partially impaired the
restaurant's assets in connection with its 1995 restructuring charge and charged
its remaining net assets to operations at the time the restaurant closed. In
addition, the Company sold two restaurants in 1996 in the Washington D.C. market
for $750,000 and recorded a gain of $446,000. The Company had previously
recorded a partial asset write-down for both of the restaurants in connection
with its restructuring reserve recorded at the end of fiscal 1995. The Company
is contingently liable under the assigned lease agreements on the two
restaurants.

The Company closed no restaurants in 1997 and has identified one
restaurant for closure as of February 27, 1998. The restaurant is planned to
close at the expiration of its lease term and its closure is not expected to
have a material impact on the Company's financial position. In 1997, the Company
recorded a $1,014,000 impairment charge for one other restaurant in accordance
with SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets to be
Disposed Of." The Company estimated fair value for the restaurant's assets was
based on the present value of expected future cash flows at the restaurant.

The Company reviews the cash flow of each restaurant throughout any given
reporting period, and performs an impairment review of its investment in
property and equipment at any given restaurant during a reporting period if
deemed necessary based on the restaurant's cash flow performance. At least
annually, the Company conducts an impairment review of its investment in
property and equipment for all of its restaurants.

Of the eleven restaurants closed by the Company, six restaurants were
outside the Company's core California market. Three closed restaurants in the
Washington D.C. market, including the two restaurants which were sold, were in
Columbia, Maryland, Arlington, Virginia and Fairfax, Virginia. Two closed
restaurants were in Dallas, Texas and one closed restaurant was in Federal Way
in the state of Washington. The five California restaurants were in San
Francisco, Menlo Park, Los Angeles, Palm Desert, and Fresno, California. The
Company had opened three of the closed restaurants in 1995, six in 1994, one in
1993 and one in 1992.


21
22
Interest Income. Interest income was $166,000 in 1997, $77,000 in 1996 and
$53,000 in 1995. In 1997 and 1996, the Company invested the excess proceeds from
its September 1996 sales of series B preferred stock to Crescent Real Estate
Equities Limited Partnership in money market funds. The Company invested the
excess proceeds pending their designated use to build or purchase new
restaurants, remodel existing restaurants, upgrade information systems or
increase working capital. In 1995, the Company had invested the balance of funds
from its 1992 initial public offering and its 1993 secondary offering in
tax-exempt municipal securities. The Company sold the balance of the investments
during 1995 to finance the construction of one new restaurant.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $52,000 in 1997, $260,000 in 1996
and $183,000 in 1995. Interest expense consists primarily of fees and interest
related to the Company's short-term line of credit facility and capital lease
obligations for equipment leases. Interest expense decreased in 1997 as the
Company paid down its remaining capital lease obligations. In 1996, the Company
financed the construction of one restaurant through line of credit borrowings.
The Company's only long-term debt during the three year period consisted of a
site construction note which is included in other long-term liabilities and
capital lease obligations.

Provision for Income Taxes. In 1997, the Company offset currently taxable
income with available net operating losses carryforwards and, as a result,
recorded no tax provision for its operating income. The Company recorded no tax
benefit from its operating loss in 1996 due to valuation allowances against its
net deferred tax assets. In 1995, the Company computed the tax benefit on its
operating loss at an 8.7% effective tax rate which varies from the expected
40.1% combined Federal and state statutory rate. The valuation allowance as well
as lost state carryforwards account for the variance between the Company's
effective tax rate and the statutory rate each year. The Company is maintaining
a full valuation allowance against any unused deferred tax assets, including its
remaining net operating loss carryforwards, until it becomes more likely than
not, in management's assessment, that the deferred tax assets will be realized.


22
23
QUARTERLY INFORMATION

The following table sets forth certain quarterly results of operations for
1997 and 1996:




Year Ended December 28, 1997 Year Ended December 29, 1996
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands, First 12 Second 12 Third 12 Last 16 First 12 Second 12 Third 12 Last 16
except per share data) Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks Weeks
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------


Net sales $ 16,106 $ 17,379 $ 18,334 $ 21,159 $ 18,061 $ 18,793 $ 18,644 $ 21,193

Operating income (loss) (696) 200 1,030 (315) (795) 158 396 (1,577)

Net income (loss) (649) 233 1,065 (316) (866) 95 329 (1,559)

Basic net income (loss)
per share* $ (0.11) $ 0.04 $ 0.19 $ (0.06) $ (0.16) $ 0.02 $ 0.06 $ (0.28)

Shares used in computing
basic per share amounts 5,661 5,663 5,669 5,672 5,584 5,587 5,646 5,652

Diluted net income (loss)
per share* $ (0.11) $ 0.03 $ 0.16 $ (0.06) $ (0.16) $ 0.02 $ 0.06 $ (0.28)

Shares used in computing
diluted per share amounts 5,661 6,854 6,860 5,672 5,584 5,648 5,664 5,652

Number of restaurants 48 51 51 53 54 53 51 48
open at end of quarter


* The sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per share amounts will not
necessarily equal the net income (loss) per share for the total fiscal
year


The Company's restaurants experience seasonal fluctuations, as a
disproportionate amount of net sales and restaurant operating income are
generally realized in the second and third fiscal quarters. In addition, the
Company's quarterly results of operations have been, and may continue to be,
materially impacted by the timing of new restaurant openings and by restaurant
closings. The fourth quarter normally includes 16 weeks of operations as
compared with 12 weeks for each of the three prior quarters. As a result of
these factors, net sales and net income in the fourth quarter are not comparable
to results in each of the first three fiscal quarters, and net sales and income
can be expected to decline in the first quarter of each fiscal year in
comparison to the fourth quarter of the prior fiscal year. Because of recent
operating losses, restaurant closures in 1996, the seasonality of the Company's
business and the impact of new restaurant openings, results for any quarter
cannot be relied upon as indicative of the results that may be achieved for a
full fiscal year.


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company's primary capital requirement has been for the expansion of
its restaurant operations which the Company has traditionally financed with
funds from equity offerings, cash flow from operations, landlord allowances,
equipment leases and short-term bank debt. The Company does not have significant
receivables or inventory and receives trade credit based upon negotiated terms
in purchasing food and supplies.


23
24
As of December 28, 1997, the Company had incurred cash costs of
approximately $2.7 million in connection with restaurant closures and the
related settlements of lease obligations under its restructuring plan announced
at the end of 1995. The Company closed three restaurants in 1995 and closed or
sold eight restaurants in 1996. The Company has one previously closed restaurant
for which it is negotiating a settlement of the lease obligation and believes
the restructuring reserve balance of $0.7 million at December 28, 1997 is
adequate to cover the estimated cash costs to settle this one remaining lease
obligation.

At December 28, 1997 the Company had a $5,000,000 bank line of credit
which expires in May 1998. Borrowings bear interest at the prime rate (8.5% at
December 28, 1997) plus 1%. Borrowings under the line are secured by the
Company's personal property and by executed deeds of trust on certain
Company-owned real estate. Borrowings under the line of credit are limited to
the lesser of $5,000,000 or three times the Company's earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company had the full $5,000,000
available under the bank line of credit agreement at December 28, 1997. The
agreement also provides an option for the Company to convert borrowings up to
$3,500,000 to a 48-month term loan at any time prior to the maturity date of May
1998. Borrowings under the term loan bear interest at the prime rate plus 1.75%.

The agreement requires the Company to achieve a minimum earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the 1997 fiscal year, to
maintain a minimum tangible net worth, to not exceed a maximum debt to net
tangible worth ratio and, for the term loan, to maintain a minimum debt service
coverage ratio. The agreement also contains a maximum fixed asset acquisition
limit. At December 28, 1997, the Company had no borrowings under this agreement
and was in compliance with all covenants. The Company is in discussions to renew
the line of credit with the bank.

For the year ended December 28, 1997, the Company invested $5.1 million in
property and equipment which was funded through existing cash balances and
internally generated cash. Capital expenditures of approximately $3.7 million
related to the purchase of three Zoopa restaurants and the opening of two new
Zoopa restaurants.

The Company purchased three Zoopa restaurants in Bellevue, Tacoma and
Tukwila, Washington in May 1997. The three restaurants, which will continue to
operate under the Zoopa name, offer a self-service format similar to Fresh
Choice restaurants including salads, hot pasta dishes, soups, bakery goods and
desserts. The Company paid $1,250,000 upon closing of the purchase and agreed to
make an additional payment one year after closing of between $550,000 and
$950,000 depending on the achievement of restaurant sales levels. The Company
has recorded a $600,000 acquisition payable for the purchase of the restaurants
and will record an additional liability when the amount, if any, is
determinable.

The Company opened two new Zoopa restaurants in December 1997 in San
Antonio and Houston, Texas. The Company plans to open four to six additional
restaurants in 1998 and had three executed lease commitments at February 27,
1998 for two additional restaurants in Houston, Texas and another restaurant in
San Antonio, Texas.

In addition, the Company plans to remodel ten to thirteen restaurants in
1998 utilizing the Zoopa decor package. The Company anticipates the total cost
of these remodels to be approximately $2,000,000.


24
25
During the year ended December 28, 1997 operating activities provided $2.2
million (which is net of $1.0 million in cash costs related to the Company's
restructuring plan) compared to $423,000 in 1996 (which is net of $1.5 million
in cash costs related to the Company's restructuring plan).

The Company's outstanding Series B non-voting convertible preferred stock
is currently held by one entity and is convertible, at the holders' option, into
Series A voting convertible preferred stock on a one-for-one basis. Although no
Series A preferred stock is currently outstanding, any holders of Series A
preferred stock would be entitled to vote with common stockholders on all
matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. When and if issued, the holders of
a majority of the outstanding Series A preferred stock will have a separate
right to approve certain corporate actions. In the event of a failure by the
Company to achieve an earnings target (before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization) of at least $5,500,000 in 1998 (subject to adjustment under
certain circumstances by the Company's Board of Directors), the Series A
preferred stockholders could elect a majority of the Company's Board of
Directors. Upon achievement of certain per-share market price tests, the Company
may force a mandatory conversion of the Series A preferred stock to common
stock. No shares of Series C preferred stock are currently outstanding, but an
option to purchase such shares is outstanding. The Series A, Series B and Series
C preferred stock are senior to the Company's common stock with respect to
dividends and with respect to distributions on liquidation.

The Company's continued growth depends to a significant degree on its
ability to open new restaurants and to operate such restaurants profitably. The
Company intends to continue its restaurant expansion, assuming its financial
performance continues to improve. The Company's ability to implement an
expansion strategy will depend upon a variety of factors, including the
continued success of efforts to restore profitability and the Company's ability
to obtain funds. See "Business - Business Risks - Expansion." The Company
believes its operating cash requirements and near-term capital requirements for
restaurant expansion and remodeling can be met through existing cash balances,
cash provided by operations, equipment lease financing and its available line of
credit and term loan agreement. The Company may seek additional debt or equity
financing to provide greater flexibility toward improving its operating
performance and continuing expansion.


INFLATION

Many of the Company's crewmembers are paid hourly rates related to the
federal and state minimum wage laws. Accordingly, increases in the minimum wage
could materially increase the Company's labor costs. The Federal minimum wage
increased effective September 1, 1997 and the State of California minimum wage
increased March 1, 1998. There are currently no further scheduled increases in
the Federal or State minimum wage. In addition, the cost of food commodities
utilized by the Company are subject to market supply and demand pressures.
Shifts in these costs may have a significant impact on the Company's food costs.
The Company anticipates that increases in these costs can be offset through
pricing and other cost control efforts; however, there is no assurance that the
Company would be able to pass such costs on to its guests or that even if it
were able to do so, it could do so in a short period of time.


YEAR 2000 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS

The Company has completed a review of all its restaurant and corporate
computer systems for compliance with the year 2000. The Company has determined
that certain of its existing computer


25
26
systems use only two digits to identify a year in the date field and, as a
result, may improperly identify the year 2000 in calculating and processing
information. The Company recognizes this system design could cause certain
systems to potentially fail or create erroneous results by or at the year 2000
but believes its current strategic information plan is addressing the problem.

The Company is currently in the process of migrating its critical
processing and information requirements to outsourced processing companies whose
software is represented to be year 2000 compliant. The Company expects to
complete this system migration, begun in 1997, during 1998 with no significant
incremental costs. In accordance with its strategic information plan, the
Company is already replacing certain restaurant systems, primarily its
restaurant point of sale system, used for capturing and transmitting data to the
outsourced systems, with year 2000 compliant systems. The Company expects to
have the critical restaurant systems in place by approximately the end of 1998
at an estimated cost of $500,000 which is to be capitalized in accordance with
normal policy and is being funded through operating cash flow.

The Company has also contacted outside entities with which it interacts
electronically and has requested information regarding whether or not their
systems are or will be year 2000 compliant. The Company plans to monitor the
progress of outside entities that are in the process of developing year 2000
compliance, but it does not believe there is a material risk to the Company if
these entities do not achieve compliance.


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

The Company's financial statements as of December 28, 1997 and December
29, 1996 and for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 28,
1997, and the Independent Auditors' Report, are included in the report as listed
on Page 28 of this Report, Item 14(a).


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

Not applicable.


26
27
PART III


Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Report. The
Company plans to file its Proxy Statement (the "Proxy Statement") pursuant to
Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered
by this Report, and certain information included therein is incorporated herein
by reference.


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

There is incorporated by reference the information relating to the
directors of the Company set forth under the caption "Election of Directors" in
the Proxy Statement. Information relating to the executive officers of the
Company is set forth in Part I of this Report under the caption "Executive
Officers of the Registrant."


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

There is incorporated by reference the information relating to executive
compensation set forth under the caption "Executive Compensation and Other
Matters" in the Proxy Statement.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

There is incorporated by reference the information relating to ownership
of equity securities of the Company by certain beneficial owners and management
set forth under the caption "General Information -- Stock Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management" in the Proxy Statement.


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

There is incorporated by reference the information relating to certain
relationships and related transactions set forth under the caption "Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" in the Proxy Statement.


27
28
PART IV


ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

(a) 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

Page Nos.
---------

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 28, 1997
and December 29, 1996...................................................F-1
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal
Years Ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996
and December 31, 1995...................................................F-2
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the
Fiscal Years Ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996
and December 31, 1995...................................................F-3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the Fiscal Years Ended December
28, 1997, December 29, 1996 and December 31, 1995.......................F-4
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.............................F-5
Independent Auditors' Report...............................................F-19

2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. All schedules have been omitted because the
information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown
in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

3. EXHIBITS. The Exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed
or incorporated by reference as part of this Report. Exhibit Nos. 10.2,
10.3, 10.20, 10.21, 10.22, 10.23, 10.24, 10.25, 10.26, 10.27, 10.28 and
10.30 are management contracts or compensatory plans covering executive
officers and directors of Fresh Choice, Inc.

(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. The registrant did not file any reports on Form 8-K
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 1997.


28
29
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS Fresh Choice, Inc.
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)




December 28, December 29,
1997 1996
------------ ------------

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,415 $ 5,647
Receivables 124 218
Inventories 461 432
Pre-opening costs 130 23
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 544 513
------------ ------------
Total current assets 3,674 6,833
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net 30,842 29,509
LEASE ACQUISITION COSTS, net 481 556
DEPOSITS AND OTHER ASSETS 611 268
------------ ------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 35,608 $ 37,166
============ ============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable $ 2,271 $ 2,077
Accrued salaries and wages 1,286 1,445
Sales tax payable 525 462
Other accrued expenses 2,101 2,790
Acquisition payable related to purchase of restaurants 600 --
Restructuring reserve 721 2,696
Current portion of capital lease obligations -- 89
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 7,504 9,559
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES 1,786 1,691
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 9,290 11,250
------------ ------------

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 2 and 7)

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value; 3.5 million shares
authorized; shares outstanding: 1997 and 1996 -1,187,906 5,175 5,175
Common stock, $.001 par value; 15 million shares authorized;
shares outstanding: 1997-5,682,193; 1996-5,660,826 42,139 42,070
Accumulated deficit (20,996) (21,329)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity 26,318 25,916
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 35,608 $ 37,166
============ ============



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


F-1
30
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS Fresh Choice, Inc.
(In thousands, except per share data)




Fiscal Year Ended
------------------------------------------------
December 28, December 29, December 31,
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------


NET SALES $ 72,978 $ 76,691 $ 84,280

COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales 19,480 21,107 23,059
Restaurant operating expenses:
Labor 22,566 24,853 27,375
Occupancy and other 22,041 23,021 26,163
Depreciation and amortization 3,082 3,336 5,731
General and administrative expenses 5,590 7,089 8,341
Gain on sale of restaurants -- (446) --
Restructuring and asset impairment expenses -- (451) 23,932
------------ ------------ ------------

Total costs and expenses 72,759 78,509 114,601
------------ ------------ ------------

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) 219 (1,818) (30,321)

Interest income 166 77 53
Interest expense (52) (260) (183)
------------ ------------ ------------

Interest income (expense), net 114 (183) (130)
------------ ------------ ------------

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES 333 (2,001) (30,451)

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes -- -- (2,655)
------------ ------------ ------------

NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 333 $ (2,001) $ (27,796)
============ ============ ============

Basic net income (loss) per common share $ 0.06 $ (0.36) $ (5.05)
============ ============ ============

Shares used in computing basic per share amounts 5,667 5,625 5,504
============ ============ ============

Diluted net income (loss) per common share $ 0.05 $ (0.36) $ (5.05)
============ ============ ============

Shares used in computing diluted per share amounts 6,859 5,625 5,504
============ ============ ============



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


F-2
31
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Fresh Choice, Inc.
(Dollars in thousands)




Convertible Preferred Stock Common Stock Unrealized Retained Total
--------------------------- --------------------- Loss on Earnings Stockholders'
Shares Amount Shares Amount Investments (Deficit) Equity
--------- --------- --------- --------- ----------- --------- -------------

BALANCES-December 26, 1994 -- $ -- 5,478,470 $ 40,921 $ (53) $ 8,468 $ 49,336

Exercise of stock options -- -- 28,130 51 -- -- 51
Sales of common stock
under employee
stock purchase plan -- -- 25,849 190 -- -- 190
Change in unrealized loss
on short-term
investments, net of
$32 tax effect -- -- -- -- 53 -- 53
Issuance of common stock
for consulting
services -- -- 50,000 344 -- -- 344
Common stock warrant
issued under the terms
of a bank line of credit -- -- -- 113 -- -- 113
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (27,796) (27,796)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
BALANCES-December 31, 1995 -- -- 5,582,449 41,619 -- (19,328) 22,291

Exercise of stock options -- -- 7,630 22 -- -- 22
Sales of common stock
under employee
stock purchase plan -- -- 20,747 104 -- -- 104
Issuance of common stock
for consulting
services -- -- 50,000 325 -- -- 325
Sale of convertible
preferred stock 1,187,906 5,175 -- -- -- -- 5,175
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- (2,001) (2,001)
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
BALANCES-December 29, 1996 1,187,906 5,175 5,660,826 42,070 -- (21,329) 25,916

Exercise of stock options -- -- 602 1 -- -- 1
Sales of common stock
under employee
stock purchase plan -- -- 20,765 68 -- -- 68
Net income -- -- -- -- -- 333 333
--------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
BALANCES-December 28, 1997 1,187,906 $ 5,175 5,682,193 $ 42,139 $ -- $ (20,996) $ 26,318
========= ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


F-3
32
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW Fresh Choice, Inc.
(Dollars in thousands)




Fiscal Year Ended
----------------------------------------------
December 28, December 29, December 31,
1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------


OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) $ 333 $ (2,001) $ (27,796)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by operations:
Restructuring and asset impairment expense -- (451) 23,647
Depreciation and amortization 3,319 3,567 6,030
Issuance of common stock for consulting services -- 325 --
Premium amortization on short-term investments -- -- 26
Loss on sale of short-term investments -- -- 46
Loss (gain) on disposal of property 120 (524) 585
Deferred rent 114 112 302
Deferred income taxes -- -- (997)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables 94 (11) 45
Inventories (29) 23 76
Pre-opening costs (137) (58) (498)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (31) 173 93
Income taxes payable (refundable) -- 1,602 (1,408)
Accounts payable 194 (832) (280)
Accrued salaries and wages (159) 324 112
Other accrued expenses (626) (329) 1,801
Restructuring reserve (961) (1,497) --
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 2,231 423 1,784
------------ ------------ ------------

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures (5,081) (1,750) (7,531)
Proceeds from sale of restaurants -- 750 --
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments -- -- 4,652
Deposits and other assets (361) 36 870
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash used in investing activities (5,442) (964) (2,009)
------------ ------------ ------------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Common stock sales 69 126 241
Convertible preferred stock sales -- 5,175 --
Other note payable - borrowings (repayments) (1) (1) 120
Capital lease obligations - repayments (89) (406) (384)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (21) 4,894 (23)
------------ ------------ ------------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (3,232) 4,353 (248)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
Beginning of year 5,647 1,294 1,542
------------ ------------ ------------
End of year $ 2,415 $ 5,647 $ 1,294
============ ============ ============
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the year for interest $ 22 $ 58 $ 166
------------ ------------ ------------
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
Acquisition payable related to purchase of restaurants $ 600 $ -- $ --
------------ ------------ ------------
Common stock warrant issued under the terms of a
bank line of credit $ -- $ -- $ 113
------------ ------------ ------------



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


F-4
33
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

Description of business. Fresh Choice, Inc. (the Company) is incorporated in
Delaware and is engaged in operating self-service restaurants, under the names
Fresh Choice and Zoopa, offering specialty and traditional salads, hot pasta
dishes, soups, bakery goods and desserts. The Company operated 53 restaurants at
December 28, 1997, 48 restaurants at December 29, 1996, and 55 restaurants at
December 31, 1995.

Basis of presentation. The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and Moffett Design Corporation, a wholly-owned
subsidiary, after elimination of intercompany transactions and balances. The
Company's fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in December. Fiscal years 1997 and
1996 each contained 52 weeks whereas fiscal year 1995 contained 53 weeks.

Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses as of the dates and for the periods presented. Such management
estimates include the restructuring reserve, the valuation allowance for
deferred income taxes, the acquisition payable for the purchase of restaurants
and certain other accrued expenses. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid debt
instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.

Concentration of credit risk. The Company considers cash and cash equivalents to
be financial instruments which could potentially subject the Company to a
concentration of credit risk. The Company maintains its excess cash balances, if
any, in a variety of financial instruments such as money market funds and state
and local government bonds and has not experienced any material losses on any of
the investments.

Inventories. Inventories consist principally of food and supplies stated at the
lower of cost (first in, first out) or market.

Pre-opening costs. Pre-opening costs consist of the direct costs associated with
opening a new restaurant including the costs of hiring and training the initial
workforce. Pre-opening costs are amortized over a twelve-month period commencing
with the restaurant opening.

Property and equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation
and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets which range from 5 to 30 years or the lease term of a
restaurant including option periods, as appropriate, not to exceed 25 years. The
Company reviews the cash flow of each restaurant throughout any given reporting
period and performs an impairment review of its investment in property and
equipment at any given restaurant during a reporting period if deemed necessary
based on the restaurant's cash flow performance. At least annually, the Company
performs an impairment review of its investment in property and equipment for
all of its restaurants.

F-5
34
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995

Lease acquisition costs. Lease acquisition costs are amortized using the
straight-line method over the remaining term of the acquired lease including
option periods, as appropriate, not to exceed 25 years.

Deferred rent. The Company computes rent expense on a straight-line basis for
operating leases that contain provisions for scheduled rent increases over the
lease term.

Income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized to reflect the
estimated future tax effects, calculated at currently effective tax rates, of
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting and income tax purposes. A valuation allowance related to a deferred
tax asset is recorded until it is deemed more likely than not that the deferred
tax asset will be realized.

Net income (loss) per common share. The Company reports basic and diluted net
income (loss) per common share (EPS) in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No.128, "Earnings per Share" (SFAS 128) which the Company
adopted during the fourth quarter of 1997. The Company retroactively restated
1996 and 1995 EPS as required by SFAS 128. Basic EPS excludes dilution and is
computed by dividing net income by the weighted average of common shares
outstanding for the year. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or
converted into common stock. In accordance with SFAS 128, the Company converts
common stock options and warrants into dilutive potential shares using the
treasury stock method and converts preferred stock into dilutive potential
shares using the "if converted" method.

Stock-based compensation. The Company accounts for stock-based awards to
employees using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees."


2. Restructuring Plan and Asset Impairment

In December 1995, after an analysis of the sales potential and operating
economics of every Fresh Choice restaurant, the Company finalized and announced
a restructuring plan to help restore profitability. The Company's profitability
had declined in the second half of 1994, and the Company reported its first
operating loss in the fourth quarter of 1994 and additional operating losses for
each quarter of 1995.

The restructuring plan announced in December 1995 called for closing as
many as ten of the Company's restaurants, of which seven restaurants were
included in a reserve for closures, and a partial write-down of assets to
estimated fair value for thirteen other restaurants. The Company based its
reserve analysis on SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets to be Disposed Of" which establishes standards to identify and measure
impairment of long-lived assets. Management believes the Company's adoption of
SFAS No.121 concurrent with the Company's development of a restructuring plan
did not alter the amount or components of the plan and, as a result, the
adoption of the accounting standard did not have a material impact on the
Company's financial position or operations.

1995 Restructuring Reserve. In 1995, the Company recorded a $23,932,000
restructuring charge in connection with the plan which consisted of three parts:
(1) an $18,671,000 non-cash impairment charge of which $8,318,000 related to a
write-down of assets to fair market value at the seven restaurants identified
for closure and $10,353,000 related to a write-down to fair market value at 13
other


F-6
35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


restaurants, (2) a $4,655,000 charge for estimated cash costs associated
with restaurant closures and settlement of lease obligations, and (3) a $606,000
charge for other costs, both cash and non-cash, primarily for consulting and
other professional services rendered in connection with the Company's
restructuring. Fair value for the write-down of assets at restaurants was
estimated based on the present value of expected future cash flows.

During 1996, the Company closed six of the seven restaurants identified
for closure. The Company decided not to close the seventh restaurant based on
its improved operating performance and reversed $451,000 in 1996 of the
previously recorded restructuring expense which related primarily to anticipated
cash payments to close the restaurant and settle the lease obligation. The
Company reversed an additional $1,618,000 in 1996 of the previously recorded
restructuring expense due primarily to lower than estimated cash payments to
settle lease obligations at five of the six closed restaurants. The Company
attributed the lower than estimated cash payments to better than expected real
estate markets which enabled landlords to locate new tenants for the closed
locations. The Company negotiated cash payments to landlords to settle the lease
obligations for four of the closed restaurants, assumed a contingent liability
in connection with a sublease agreement for the fifth closed restaurant, and is
negotiating for a lease settlement with the landlord for the sixth closed
restaurant. As of December 28, 1997, the 1995 restructuring reserve balance
consisted primarily of the estimated cash costs to settle the lease obligation
on the sixth closed restaurant. During 1997, the Company reversed an additional
$732,000 of the previously-recorded restructuring expense based on updated
estimates of the costs to resolve the final lease obligation. The Company
believes the balance at December 28, 1997 is adequate to cover the remaining
costs to be incurred in connection with the lease obligation.

1996 Restructuring Reserve. During 1996, the Company identified and closed
or sold five additional restaurants for a total of eleven closed restaurants.
The Company recorded a $1,618,000 restructuring charge for two of the
restaurants which consisted of (1) a $650,000 non-cash charge for the write-down
of assets to fair market value at one restaurant that was not previously
impaired and (2) a $968,000 charge for estimated cash costs associated with
restaurant closures and settlement of lease obligations for both restaurants.
The Company closed both restaurants during 1996 and reached a settlement with
the landlord for the lease obligation for one restaurant in 1996 and for the
other restaurant in 1997. As of December 28, 1997, the Company has no remaining
obligations related to the closure of the two restaurants and reversed $282,000
in 1997 of the previously recorded restructuring expense due primarily to lower
than estimated cash payments to close the restaurants and settle the lease
obligations. The Company closed a third restaurant in 1996 which did not require
a cash settlement with the landlord for lease obligations. The Company had
partially impaired the restaurant's assets in connection with its 1995
restructuring charge and charged its remaining net assets to operations at the
time the restaurant closed. In addition, the Company sold two restaurants in
1996 in the Washington D.C. market for $750,000 and recorded a gain of $446,000.
The Company had previously recorded a partial asset write-down for both of the
restaurants in connection with its restructuring reserve recorded at the end of
fiscal 1995. The Company is contingently liable under the assigned lease
agreements on the two restaurants.

1997 Asset Impairment Charge. The Company closed no restaurants in 1997
and has identified one restaurant for closure as of December 28, 1997. The
restaurant, which had been previously impaired in connection with the Company's
1995 restructuring charge, is planned to close at the expiration of its lease
term, and its closure is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's
financial position.


F-7
36
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


In 1997, the Company recorded a $1,014,000 non-cash impairment charge related to
the write-down of assets to fair market value for one other restaurant.

The following table sets forth the Company's 1996 restructuring and 1995
restructuring reserves and the respective balances at December 28, 1997,
December 29, 1996 and December 31, 1995.




Provided
(In thousands) Provided Utilized Balance (Reversed) Utilized
in 1995 in 1995 1995 in 1996 in 1996
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------

1995 Reserve:

Restaurant closures:

Non-cash write-down
of restaurant assets to
estimated fair value
and other related
costs $ 8,318 $ (8,010) $ 308 $ (250) $ --

Estimated cash costs
associated with
restaurant closures
and settlement of
lease obligations 4,655 (205) 4,450 (1,442) (1,243)

Impaired restaurants:

Non-cash write-down
of assets to estimated
fair value at other
restaurants and other
related costs 10,353 (10,027) 326 (326) --

Other costs, primarily
consulting and
professional fees
related to the
restructuring plan:
Cash costs 106 (80) 26 (51) (109)
Non-cash costs 500 (344) 156 -- (22)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1995 reserve 23,932 (18,666) 5,266 (2,069) (1,374)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1996 Reserve:

Restaurant closures:

Non-cash write-down
of restaurant assets to
estimated fair value
and other related
costs -- -- -- 650 (622)

Estimated cash costs
associated with
restaurant closures
and settlement of
lease obligations -- -- -- 968 (123)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1996 reserve -- -- -- 1,618 (745)
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1997 Impairment:
Non-cash write-down
of restaurant assets to
estimated fair value -- -- -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total reserves $ 23,932 $(18,666) $ 5,266 $ (451) $ (2,119)
======== ======== ======== ======== ========





Provided
(In thousands) Reclassified Balance (Reversed) Utilized Balance
in 1996 1996 in 1997 in 1997 1997
------------ -------- -------- -------- --------

1995 Reserve:

Restaurant closures:

Non-cash write-down
of restaurant assets to
estimated fair value
and other related
costs $ -- $ 58 $ (58) $ -- $ --

Estimated cash costs
associated with
restaurant closures
and settlement of
lease obligations -- 1,765 (674) (370) 721

Impaired restaurants:

Non-cash write-down
of assets to estimated
fair value at other
restaurants and other
related costs -- -- -- -- --

Other costs, primarily
consulting and
professional fees
related to the
restructuring plan:
Cash costs 134 -- -- -- --
Non-cash costs (134) -- -- -- --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1995 reserve -- 1,823 (732) (370) 721
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1996 Reserve:

Restaurant closures:

Non-cash write-down
of restaurant assets to
estimated fair value
and other related
costs -- 28 (28) -- --

Estimated cash costs
associated with
restaurant closures
and settlement of
lease obligations -- 845 (254) (591) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1996 reserve -- 873 (282) (591) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
1997 Impairment:
Non-cash write-down
of restaurant assets to
estimated fair value -- -- 1,014 (1,014) --
-------- -------- -------- -------- --------
Total reserves $ -- $ 2,696 $ -- $ (1,975) $ 721
======== ======== ======== ======== ========



F-8
37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


In 1995, other non-cash costs included a $344,000 non-cash charge for
50,000 shares of the Company's common stock issued in exchange for restructuring
consulting services (see Note 5). The Company also issued a contingent warrant
to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's stock in exchange for restructuring
consulting services (see Note 5).

The following table presents the results of operations for the eleven
restaurants closed or sold in connection with the Company's restructuring plan:




(In thousands) 1996 1995
-------- --------


Net sales $ 5,892 $ 10,380

Cost of sales 1,769 2,964
Restaurant operating expenses:
Labor 2,157 4,189
Occupancy and other 2,198 4,057
Depreciation and amortization 102 1,328
-------- --------

Total costs and expenses 6,226 12,538
-------- --------

Operating loss $ (334) $ (2,158)
======== ========



3. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of:




December 28, December 29,
(In thousands) 1997 1996
------------ ------------


Land $ 1,795 $ 1,795
Buildings and improvements 5,938 5,938
Leasehold improvements 18,727 17,585
Equipment 12,129 9,985
Equipment under captial leases -- 502
Furniture and fixtures 5,657 4,747
Construction in progress 276 61

------------ ------------
Total property and equipment 44,522 40,613
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (13,680) (11,104)
------------ ------------

Property and equipment, net $ 30,842 $ 29,509
============ ============



Accumulated amortization of equipment leased under capital leases at
December 29, 1996 was approximately $1,500,000. The Company had no equipment
leased under capital leases at December 28, 1997. Subsequent to December 28,
1997, the Company placed approximately $828,000 of equipment under capital
leases (see Note 7) of which approximately $672,000 is included in the Company's
equipment accounts at December 28, 1997.


F-9
38
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


4. Borrowing Arrangements

Line of Credit. At December 28, 1997 the Company had a $5,000,000 bank
line of credit which expires in May 1998. Borrowings bear interest at the prime
rate (8.5% at December 28, 1997) plus 1%. Borrowings under the line are secured
by the Company's personal property and by deeds of trust on certain
Company-owned real estate. Borrowings under the line of credit are limited to
the lesser of $5,000,000 or three times the Company's earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization. The Company had the full $5,000,000
available under the bank line of credit agreement at December 28, 1997. The
agreement also provides an option for the Company to convert borrowings up to
$3,500,000 to a 48-month term loan at any time prior to the maturity date of May
1998. Borrowings under the term loan bear interest at the prime rate plus 1.75%.

The agreement requires the Company to achieve a minimum earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the 1997 fiscal year, to
maintain a minimum tangible net worth, to not exceed a maximum debt to net
tangible worth ratio and, for the term loan, to maintain a minimum debt service
coverage ratio. The agreement also contains a maximum fixed asset acquisition
limit. The Company was in compliance with these covenants at December 28, 1997.

The Company had no borrowings under the line of credit at December 28,
1997 or December 29, 1996.

Other Note Payable. The Company has a $118,000 promissory note included in
other long-term obligations which is payable over 33 years and bears interest at
8%.


5. Common Stock

Stock Option Plan. The Company has reserved 1,500,000 shares for issuance
to employees, management, directors and consultants under an incentive stock
option plan and a nonqualified stock option plan (the Plan). Under the Plan, the
Company may grant options at prices not less than the fair market value of the
Company's common stock at the grant date. Options generally have a ten-year term
and vest over a five-year period commencing one year after grant.

During 1997, non-qualified options to purchase 120,000 common shares,
having terms similar to options granted under the Plan, were granted at an
exercise price of $4.375 per share to an executive officer of the Company. These
non-qualified options were outstanding as of December 28, 1997 and are reflected
in the summary of stock option activity below. During 1995, non-qualified
options to purchase 120,000 common shares, having terms similar to options
granted under the Plan, were granted at an exercise price of $6.875 per share to
an executive officer of the Company. These non-qualified options were canceled
as of December 28, 1997 but were outstanding at December 29, 1996 and December
31, 1995. The options are reflected in the summary of stock option activity
below.


F-10
39
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


A summary of stock option activity follows:




Weighted
Number of Average
Shares Exercise Price
-------------- --------------

Outstanding - December 25, 1994
(66,214 exercisable at a weight average price of $12.63) 371,653 $ 18.39
Options granted (weighted average fair value of $3.10) 440,716 $ 6.69
Options cancelled (205,876) $ 21.67
Options exercised (28,130) $ 1.83
--------------

Outstanding - December 31, 1995
(95,371 exercisable at a weighted average price of $10.86) 578,363 $ 9.12
Options granted (weighted average fair value of $2.86) 88,340 $ 5.95
Options cancelled (108,865) $ 13.02
Options exercised (7,630) $ 2.89
--------------

Outstanding - December 29, 1996
(159,458 exercisable at a weighted average price of $8.79) 550,208 $ 7.92
Options granted (weighted average fair value of $1.84) 336,750 $ 4.25
Options cancelled (289,350) $ 8.56
Options exercised (602) $ 1.45
--------------

Outstanding - December 28, 1997 597,006 $ 5.55
==============



Additional information regarding options outstanding as of December 28, 1997 is
as follows:



Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
------------------------------------------- ------------------------
Weighted Weighted Weighted
Average Average Average
Range of Number Contractual Exercise Number Exercise
Exercise Prices Outstanding Life in Years Price Exercisable Price
- ------------------- ----------- ------------- ---------- ----------- ---------

$ 0.17 - $ 1.45 6,878 2.2 $ 0.49 6,878 $ 0.49
$ 3.25 - $ 6.88 565,706 8.5 $ 5.08 124,684 $ 6.23
$10.06 - $10.38 10,838 7.0 $10.09 6,862 $10.10
$21.00 - $26.13 13,584 5.8 $23.84 11,384 $23.85
------ ------ --------- -------- -------- --------- -------
$ 0.17 - $26.13 597,006 8.4 $ 5.55 149,808 $ 7.48
====== ====== ========= ======== ======== ========= =======



At December 28, 1997, 671,676 shares were available for future grants under the
Plan.


F-11
40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


Stock Purchase Plan. Under the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
eligible employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 10 percent of their
base compensation, as defined, to purchase common stock at a price equal to 85
percent of the lower of the fair market value as of the beginning or end of each
six-month offering period. Shares of common stock issued under the plan were
20,765, 20,747, and 25,849 shares in 1997, 1996, and 1995 at weighted average
prices of $3.27, $5.02, and $7.34 per share, respectively. A total of 129,600
shares were reserved for issuance and 28,138 shares remain available for
issuance at December 28, 1997.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. As discussed in Note 1, the
Company accounts for its stock-based awards using the intrinsic value method in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees" and its related interpretations. Accordingly, no
compensation expense has been recognized in the financial statements for
employee stock arrangements.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation," (SFAS 123) requires the disclosure of pro forma net
income (loss) and net income (loss) per share had the Company adopted the fair
value method as of the beginning of 1995. Under SFAS 123, the fair value of
stock-based awards to employees is calculated through the use of option pricing
models. Such models were developed to estimate the fair value of freely
tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions which differs
significantly from stock option awards. These models also require subjective
assumptions, including future stock price volatility and expected time to
exercise, which greatly affect the calculated values. The Company's calculations
were made using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
weighted average assumptions: expected life, twelve months following vesting for
officers and directors and six months following vesting for all other employees;
stock volatility, 62.6% in 1997, 60.1% in 1996 and 56.2% in 1995; risk free
interest rate, 7.0% in 1997, 1996 and 1995; and no dividends during the expected
term. The Company's calculations are based on a multiple option valuation
approach and forfeitures are recognized as they occur. The fair value of the
employee purchase rights under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan was estimated
using the same model, but with the following weighted average assumptions:
expected option life, six months; stock volatility, 45.4% in 1997, 43.5% in 1996
and 46.0% in 1995, risk-free rates, 3.5% in 1997, 1996 and 1995; and no
dividends during the expected term.

If the computed fair values of the 1997, 1996 and 1995 awards had been
amortized to expense over the vesting period of the awards, pro forma net income
would have been $106,000 ($.02 per share for both basic and diluted earnings per
share) in 1997 and pro forma net loss would have been $2,567,000 ($0.46 per
share for both basic and diluted earnings per share) in 1996 and $27,980,000
($5.08 per share for both basic and diluted earnings per share) in 1995.
However, the impact of outstanding non-vested stock options granted prior to
1995 has been excluded from the pro forma calculations; accordingly, the 1997,
1996 and 1995 pro forma adjustments are not indicative of future period pro
forma adjustments.


F-12
41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share. A reconciliation of
the components of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share follows:




December 28, December 29, December 25,
(In thousands, except per share data) 1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------


Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Net income (loss) $ 333 $ (2,001) $ (27,796)
============ ============ ============

Average common shares outstanding 5,667 5,625 5,504
============ ============ ============

Basic net income (loss) per common share $ 0.06 $ (0.36) $ (5.05)
============ ============ ============

Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Net income (loss) $ 333 $ (2,001) $ (27,796)
============ ============ ============

Average common shares outstanding 5,667 5,625 5,504
Dilutive shares:
Stock options 4 -- --
Convertible preferred stock 1,188 -- --
------------ ------------ ------------

Total shares and dilutive shares 6,859 5,625 5,504
============ ============ ============

Diluted net income (loss) per common share $ 0.05 $ (0.36) $ (5.05)
============ ============ ============



The Company excluded certain potentially dilutive securities each year
from its dilutive EPS computation because either the exercise price of the
securities exceeded the average fair values of the Comany's common stock or the
Company had net losses, and, therefore, these securities were anti-dilutive. A
summary of the excluded potential dilutive securities as of the end of each
fiscal year follows:




December 28, December 29, December 25,
(In thousands) 1997 1996 1995
------------ ------------ ------------

Potential Dilutive Securities

Stock Options 516 550 578
Stock Warrants 732 732 175
Convertible Preferred Stock -- 1,188 --



Other Stock Transactions. In September 1995, the Company agreed to issue,
contingent upon Board of Director approval of a restructuring plan, a warrant to
outside consultants to purchase 100,000 shares of its common stock at an
exercise price of $6.875 per share (see Note 2). The warrant expires in June
2005. The warrant was issued and became exercisable in December 1995 when the
Board approved the restructuring plan and the Company obtained financing (see
Note 5). Based on the fair value of the


F-13
42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


Company's common stock at the time the warrant became exercisable, no value has
been recorded for the warrant.

In December 1995, in addition to the above warrant, the Company issued the
outside consultants 50,000 shares of its common stock for consulting services.
These shares were recorded at their fair value at the date of issuance with a
charge of $344,000 included in restructuring expense (see Note 2). In April
1996, the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock as payment for
accrued consulting services between December 1995 and March 1996 which were
charged to general and administrative expenses. These shares were recorded at
their fair value of $6.50 per share on the date the Board of Directors approved
the issuance of the shares.

In connection with a bank line of credit agreement entered into in
December 1995, the Company issued a warrant to purchase up to 75,000 shares of
its common stock at an exercise price of $6.80 per share. The warrant expires in
November 2000. The first 37,500 shares under the warrant were exercisable
immediately. The remaining shares, which would have become exercisable if the
Company had borrowed in excess of the first $2 million available under the
one-year line of credit agreement, did not become exercisable. The Company
valued the 37,500 shares, which were immediately exercisable, at $113,000 which
is included in common stock. The related deferred charge was amortized to
interest expense over the one-year term of the line of credit.


6. Convertible Preferred Stock

In 1996, the Company sold 1,187,906 shares of its Series B non-voting
convertible preferred stock at $4.63 per share to Crescent Real Estate Equities
Limited Partnership ("Crescent") in a private offering for net proceeds of
$5,175,000 (net of $325,000 of issuance costs). Under the terms of the preferred
stock purchase agreement (the "Agreement"), Crescent and/or its assignees has an
option to purchase up to 593,953 shares of Series C non-voting convertible
preferred stock at a price of $6.00 per share during a period of three years.

The Series B non-voting convertible preferred stock converts, at the
holders' option, into Series A voting convertible preferred stock on a
one-for-one basis, and the Series A voting convertible preferred stock, Series B
non-voting convertible preferred stock and Series C non-voting convertible
preferred stock convert, at the holders' option, into common stock on a
one-for-one basis. The Series A preferred stock entitles its holders to vote
with common stockholders on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. In
addition, when and if issued, the holders of a majority of the outstanding
Series A preferred stock will have a separate right to approve certain corporate
actions. In the event of a failure by the Company to achieve earnings targets
(before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) of at least $1,500,000
in 1996, $3,500,000 in 1997 and $5,500,000 in 1998 (subject to adjustment under
certain circumstances by the Company's Board of Directors), the Series A
preferred stockholders could elect a majority of the Company's Board of
Directors. The Company achieved the specified earnings targets in both 1997 and
1996. Upon achievement of certain per-share market price tests, the Company may
force a mandatory conversion of the Series A preferred stock to common stock.
All shares of Series A, Series B and Series C preferred stock are senior to the
Company's common stock with respect to dividends and with respect to
distributions on liquidation.


F-14
43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


In connection with the Agreement, the Company also has granted to Crescent
registration rights with respect to the Common Stock issuable upon conversion of
the Series A, Series B and Series C preferred stock.


7. Lease Commitments

The Company leases restaurant and office facilities under operating lease
agreements that expire at various dates including renewal options through 2033.
The Company pays real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses related
to these leases.

At December 28, 1997, future minimum lease payments, including option
periods, under all noncancelable lease agreements are presented below:




Operating
(In thousands) Leases
----------


Year Ending:
1998 $ 7,264
1999 7,406
2000 7,651
2001 7,375
2002 6,989
Thereafter 76,152

=========
Minimum lease payments $ 112,837
=========



Subsequent to December 28, 1997, the Company entered into equipment leases
providing $828,000 in financing under capital lease agreements that expire in
2001. The Company pays property taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses
related to these leases.

The Company's rent expense is composed of minimum rental payments under
operating lease agreements. Rent expense was $7,452,000 in 1997, $7,847,000 in
1996 and $8,308,000 in 1995. The Company was not required to pay contingent
rental payments based upon a percentage of sales.

Deferred rent included in other long-term liabilities was $1,386,000 and
$1,272,000 at December 28, 1997 and December 29, 1996, respectively.

Deferred income included in other long-term liabilities was $282,000 and
$300,000 at December 28, 1997 and December 29, 1996, respectively, from a gain
on the 1993 sale and leaseback of a building and land for one of the Company's
restaurants. The Company is amortizing the gain over the 20-year initial term of
the lease.

At December 28, 1997, the Company had no material commitments for the
purchase of equipment and construction activities for new restaurant locations.


F-15
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


8. Purchase of Restaurants

In May 1997, the Company completed the purchase of three Zoopa restaurants
in Bellevue, Tacoma and Tukwila, Washington. The three restaurants, which will
continue to operate under the Zoopa name, offer a self-service format similar to
Fresh Choice restaurants including salads, hot pasta dishes, soups, bakery goods
and desserts. The Company paid $1,250,000 upon closing of the purchase and
agreed to make an additional payment one year after closing of between $550,000
and $950,000 depending on the achievement of restaurant sales levels. The
Company has recorded a $600,000 acquisition payable for the purchase of the
restaurants and will record an additional liability when the amount, if any, is
determinable. The Company allocated the purchase price to the identifiable
assets acquired, principally fixed assets.

Had the purchase of the three Zoopa restaurants taken place at the
beginning of 1996, the unaudited pro forma results of operations would have been
as follows:




Fiscal Year Ended
------------------------------
December 28, December 29,
(In thousands, except per share data) 1997 1996
------------ ------------


Net sales $ 74,943 $ 83,007

Net income (loss) 350 (1,840)

Basic net income (loss) per share 0.06 (0.33)

Diluted net income (loss) per share 0.05 (0.33)



The pro forma results of operations give effect to certain adjustments,
including depreciation and amortization of purchased assets, administrative
costs to support the increase in the Company's number of restaurants in the
Seattle, Washington market and interest income associated with funding the
purchase.


9. Income Taxes

The provision for (benefit from) income taxes consists of:




(In thousands) 1997 1996 1995
------- ------- -------


Federal current $ -- $ -- $(1,658)
State current -- -- --
------- ------- -------

Total current -- -- (1,658)
------- ------- -------

Federal deferred 115 (738) (8,625)
State deferred 203 310 (2,244)
Valuation allowance (318) 428 9,872
------- ------- -------

Total deferred -- -- (997)
------- ------- -------

Total $ -- $ -- $(2,655)
======= ======= =======



F-16
45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


The deferred portion of the Company's tax provision reflects the tax
effects of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities
for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The Company has recorded net
deferred assets which consisted primarily of the tax benefit related to
operating loss carryforwards and non-deductible asset write-downs and accruals
related to the Company's 1995 restructuring plan. Based on management's
assessment that it is deemed not more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets will be realized, the Company provided valuation allowances against its
deferred net tax assets. The Company had valuation allowance of $9,991,000 and
$10,300,000 at December 28, 1997 and December 29, 1996, respectively.

The provision for (benefit from) income taxes differs from the amount
computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate to income before
taxes as follows:




1997 1996 1995
------ ------ ------


Tax computed at federal statutory rate 35.0 % (35.0)% (35.0)%
State income taxes, net of federal effect 58.0 % 11.8 % (7.5)%
Tax exempt interest -- % -- % (0.1)%
Federal tax credits -- % -- % -- %
Valuation allowance (95.4)% 21.4 % 32.4 %
Other 2.4 % 1.8 % 1.5 %
------ ------ ------
Effective tax rate -- % -- % (8.7)%
====== ====== ======



The components of the net deferred tax asset (liability) are as follows:




December 28, December 29,
(In thousands) 1997 1996
------------ ------------


Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Tax basis depreciation and operating lease expenses $ (1,724) $ (1,571)
Restructuring expenses recognized in different periods 312 1,494
Net operating loss carryforwards 9,397 7,975
Accruals recognized in different periods 238 637
Pre-opening costs (56) (10)
Alternative minimum tax credits 944 944
Deferred rent 600 551
Federal tax credits 280 280
Valuation allowance (9,991) (10,300)
------------ ------------

Net deferred tax asset (liability) $ -- $ --
============ ============



At December 28, 1997, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $24,073,000 and $13,036,000 for federal and state income tax
purposes, respectively. These carryforwards expire through 2012 and 2002,
respectively. The net operating loss carryforwards available for state tax
purposes are substantially less than for federal tax purposes, primarily because
only 50% of net operating losses can be utilized to offset future state taxable
income. The extent to


F-17
46
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Fresh Choice, Inc.
Fiscal Years ended December 28, 1997, December 29, 1996, and December 31, 1995


which the loss carryforwards can be used to offset future taxable income may be
limited, depending on the extent of ownership changes within any three-year
period.


10. Litigation

On November 13, 1997, the settlement of a class action lawsuit filed in
the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San
Jose division, naming the Company, certain of its directors, and current and
former officers as defendants, became final.

The lawsuit had alleged that the defendants misrepresented or failed to
disclose material facts about the Company's operations and financial results,
which the plaintiffs contend resulted in an artificial inflation of the price of
the Company's stock. The suit was purportedly brought on behalf of a class of
purchasers of the Company's stock during the period from July 15, 1993 to
December 15, 1994. On March 20, 1995 the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint,
which added as defendants the co-lead underwriters of the Company's initial and
secondary public offerings and three securities analysts employed by the
underwriters. The amended complaint also expanded the alleged class period to
include purchasers of the Company's stock during the period from December 8,
1992 to February 9, 1995. On December 7, 1995, the Court dismissed the amended
complaint, with leave for further amendment. Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended
Complaint on February 27, 1996. This complaint alleged that Fresh Choice and
certain of its current and former officers and directors misrepresented or
failed to disclose material facts about the Company's operations and financial
results during the period from February 15, 1994 through February 9, 1995, in
violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

After the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint,
the parties reached an agreement to settle the lawsuit in its entirety for
$2,975,000 which was funded by insurance proceeds. The Company recorded the
settlement and related insurance recovery in general and administrative expenses
in 1997. The Court granted final approval of the settlement in an order filed on
October 14, 1997. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the settlement became
final 30 days later. The Company continues to deny all allegations in the
lawsuit.


F-18
47
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
of Fresh Choice, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Fresh
Choice, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 28, 1997 and December 29, 1996, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 28, 1997.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Fresh Choice, Inc. and
subsidiary at December 28, 1997 and December 29, 1996, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period
ended December 28, 1997 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
February 12, 1998


F-19
48
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: March 27, 1998 FRESH CHOICE, INC.


By: /s/ Everett F. Jefferson
----------------------------------------
Everett F. Jefferson
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report
has been signed below on March 27, 1998 by the following persons in the
capacities indicated.




/s/ Charles A. Lynch Chairman of the Board and Director
- -------------------------------------
Charles A. Lynch



/s/ Everett F. Jefferson President, Chief Executive Officer
- ------------------------------------- and Director
Everett F. Jefferson (Principal Executive Officer)



/s/ David E. Pertl Vice President and Chief Financial
- ------------------------------------- Officer (Principal Accounting and
David E. Pertl Financial Officer)



/s/ M. Michael Casey Director
- -------------------------------------
M. Michael Casey



/s/ Vern O. Curtis Director
- -------------------------------------
Vern O. Curtis



/s/ Carl R. Hays Director
- -------------------------------------
Carl R. Hays


48
49
INDEX TO FORM 10-K EXHIBITS




Exhibit
No. Description
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3.1 (1) Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Fresh Choice, Inc.

3.2 (8) Amended By-Laws of Fresh Choice, Inc. dated April 11, 1996

3.3 (10) Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation
of Fresh Choice, Inc.

3.4 (10) Certificate of Designation of Series A Voting Participating Convertible
Preferred Stock of Fresh Choice, Inc.

3.5 (10) Certificate of Designation of Series B Non-Voting Participating Convertible
Preferred Stock of Fresh Choice, Inc.

3.6 (10) Certificate of Designation of Series C Non-Voting Participating Convertible
Preferred Stock of Fresh Choice, Inc.

4.1 (10) Registration Rights Agreement dated September 13, 1996 between
Fresh Choice, Inc. and Crescent Real Estate Equities Limited Partnership

10.1 (1) Form of Indemnity Agreement for Directors and Officers

10.2 (2)(3) Second Amended and Restated 1988 Stock Option Plan

10.3 (2)(3) 1992 Crewmember Stock Purchase Plan

10.4 (1) Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated August 10, 1988

10.5 (1) Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated July 21, 1989

10.6 (1) Series C Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 15, 1990

10.7 (1) Master Lease and Warrant Agreement with Equitec Leasing Company
and Warrant dated January 18, 1990

10.8 (8) Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with Crescent Real Estate Equities
Limited Partnership dated April 26, 1996

10.9 (1) Series D Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 17, 1991

10.10 (5) Amendment No. 1 dated September 3, 1993 to the Business Loan
Agreement dated September 3, 1993

10.11 (5) Amendment No. 2 dated November 15, 1993 to the Business Loan
Agreement dated September 3, 1993

10.12 (1) Amendment dated December 1, 1992 to Preferred Stock Purchase
Agreements



49
50
INDEX TO FORM 10-K EXHIBITS (CONTINUED)



Exhibit
No. Description
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

10.13 (4) Business Loan Agreement dated September 3, 1993 with Bank of
America National Trust and Savings Association

10.14 (5) Amendment No. 4 dated March 31, 1995 to the Business Loan
Agreement dated September 3, 1993

10.15 (5) Amendment No. 3 dated April 27, 1994 to the Business Loan
Agreement dated September 3, 1993

10.16 (6) Loan and Security Agreement dated December 20, 1995 with
Silicon Valley Bank

10.17 (6) Third Party Security Agreement dated December 20, 1995 between
Silicon Valley Bank and Moffett Design Corporation

10.18 (6) Warrant to Purchase up to 75,000 Shares of the Company's
Common Stock issued to Silicon Valley Bank on December 20, 1995

10.19 (6) Common Stock Purchase Warrant to Purchase 100,000 Shares of the
Company's Common Stock issued to Bain & Company, dated
December 15, 1995

10.20 (6)(3) Employment Offer Letter to Robert Ferngren dated November 9, 1995

10.21 (9)(3) Amendment dated July 20, 1996 to Employment Offer Letter to Robert
Ferngren

10.22 (10)(3) Severance Agreement with Charles A. Lynch dated July 18, 1996

10.23 (10)(3) Severance Agreement with David Anderson dated July 18, 1996

10.24 (10)(3) Severance Agreement with Tim G. O'Shea dated July 18, 1996

10.25 (10)(3) Severance Agreement with Joan M. Miller dated July 18, 1996

10.26 (11)(3) Employment Offer Letter to David E. Pertl dated January 24, 1997

10.27 (11)(3) Employment Offer Letter to Everett F. Jefferson dated January 30, 1997

10.28 (11)(3) Amendment to Employment Offer Letter to Everett F. Jefferson dated
February 10, 1997

10.29 (11) Loan Modification Agreement dated November 27, 1996 with Silicon
Valley Bank

10.30 (11)(3) Severance Agreement with Tina Freedman dated March 13, 1997

10.31 (12) Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated April 2, 1997 with RUI One Corp.



50
51

INDEX TO FORM 10-K EXHIBITS (CONTINUED)




Exhibit
No. Description
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

10.32 (12) Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated July 9, 1997 with Silicon
Valley Bank

21.1 Subsidiaries of the Company

23.1 Consent of Independent Auditors

27.1 (7) Financial Data Schedule

27.2 (7) Restated Financial Data Schedule for Quarters 1, 2 and 3 of fiscal year 1997

27.3 (7) Restated Financial Data Schedule for fiscal year 1996

27.4 (7) Restated Financial Data Schedule for Quarters 1, 2 and 3 of fiscal year 1996


- ----------

(1) Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits with corresponding numbers
filed with the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-53904)
filed October 29, 1992, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 (No.
33-53904) filed December 7, 1992, except that Exhibit 3.1 is incorporated
by reference from Exhibit 3.1C and Exhibit 3.2 is incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.2B.

(2) Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits with corresponding numbers
filed with the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 4, 1994.

(3) Agreements or compensatory plans covering executive officers and directors
of Fresh Choice, Inc.

(4) Incorporated by reference from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 26, 1993.

(5) Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits with corresponding numbers
filed with the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 19, 1995.

(6) Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits with corresponding numbers
filed with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995.

(7) Included in EDGAR filing only.

(8) Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits with corresponding numbers
filed with the Company's Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 24, 1996.

(9) Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits with corresponding numbers
filed with the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 16, 1996.

(10) Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits with corresponding numbers
filed with the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 8, 1996.

(11) Incorporated by reference from the Exhibits with corresponding numbers
filed with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 29, 1996.

(12) Incorporated by reference from Exhibits with corresponding numbers filed
with the CompaQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 15,
1997.


51