UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission file number 0-25135
California | 94-2823865 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1951 Churn Creek Road Redding, California | 96002 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (530) 224-3333
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, no par value per share
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange
Act)
Yes o No x
Outstanding shares of Common Stock, no par value, as of July 31, 2003: 2,704,801
1
REDDING BANCORP & SUBSIDIARIES
Index to Form 10-Q
PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | Page: | ||||||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets | ||||||||||
June 30, 2003, December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2002 | 3 | |||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income | ||||||||||
Three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 | 4 | |||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows | ||||||||||
Three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 | 5 | |||||||||
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements | 6 | |||||||||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 10 | ||||||||
Overview | 10 | |||||||||
Sources of Income | 12 | |||||||||
Results of Operations | 12 | |||||||||
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin | 12 | |||||||||
Liquidity | 13 | |||||||||
Capital Management | 13 | |||||||||
Short term borrowings | 14 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses | 14 | |||||||||
Factors that may affect future results | 14 | |||||||||
Critical accounting policies | 15 | |||||||||
Average balances, Interest Income/Expense rates and yields | 18 | |||||||||
Volume/ Rate analysis | 19 | |||||||||
Non-interest Income | 20 | |||||||||
Non-interest Expense | 20 | |||||||||
Income taxes | 21 | |||||||||
Asset quality | 22 | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses (ALL) | 23 | |||||||||
Securities portfolio | 24 | |||||||||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk | 25 | ||||||||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 25 | ||||||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||||||
Item 1. | Legal proceedings | 26 | ||||||||
Item 2. | Changes in Securities and use of proceeds | 26 | ||||||||
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 26 | ||||||||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 26 | ||||||||
Item 5. | Other Information | 26 | ||||||||
Item 6. | Exhibits and Report on Form 8-K | 26 | ||||||||
SIGNATURES | 26 | |||||||||
EXHIBITS | 27, 28 |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
REDDING BANCORP & SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
Dollar amounts in thousands | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | Dec 31, 2002 | June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 27,737 | $ | 23,832 | $ | 25,414 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to
resell |
13,060 | 10,760 | 7,500 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
40,797 | 34,592 | 32,914 | |||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
43,520 | 32,328 | 28,084 | |||||||||||
Securities held to maturity, at cost (estimated fair value of $1,908
at June 30, 2003, $2,561 at December 31, 2002
and $3,564 at June 30, 2002) |
1,812 | 2,405 | 3,394 | |||||||||||
Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses of $4,168 at June 30,
2003, $3,793 at December 31, 2002 and $3,359 at June
30, 2002 |
284,668 | 280,087 | 252,586 | |||||||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
5,479 | 5,366 | 5,370 | |||||||||||
Other assets |
10,489 | 12,656 | 8,837 | |||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 386,765 | $ | 367,434 | $ | 331,185 | ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||
Demand noninterest bearing |
$ | 63,498 | $ | 55,170 | $ | 51,102 | ||||||||
Demand interest bearing |
98,344 | 88,251 | 83,873 | |||||||||||
Savings |
22,577 | 20,797 | 17,615 | |||||||||||
Certificates of deposits |
146,060 | 150,229 | 141,727 | |||||||||||
Total deposits |
330,479 | 314,447 | 294,317 | |||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
3,484 | 3,704 | 4,947 | |||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings |
13,000 | 18,000 | 0 | |||||||||||
Other liabilities |
5,010 | 3,616 | 3,395 | |||||||||||
Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in Companys
Junior Subordinated Debentures (Trust Preferred Securities) |
5,000 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
Total Liabilities |
356,973 | 339,767 | 302,659 | |||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (note 6) |
||||||||||||||
Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value, 2,000,000 authorized
no shares issued and outstanding in 2003 and 2002 |
||||||||||||||
Common stock , no par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized; 2,666,466 shares issued and
outstanding
at June 30,2003, 2,641,536 at December 31, 2002
and 2,683,775 at June 30, 2002 |
8,809 | 8,715 | 8,820 | |||||||||||
Retained earnings |
20,837 | 18,814 | 19,552 | |||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income gain, net of tax |
146 | 138 | 154 | |||||||||||
29,792 | 27,667 | 28,526 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 386,765 | $ | 367,434 | $ | 331,185 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
REDDING BANCORP & SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
Amounts in thousands, except for per share data | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Interest income: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 4,408 | $ | 4,156 | $ | 8,913 | $ | 7,863 | |||||||||||
Interest on tax exempt securities |
19 | 33 | 32 | 81 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on U.S. government securities |
214 | 242 | 429 | 619 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold and
securities purchased under agreements to
resell |
69 | 48 | 120 | 111 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on other securities |
0 | 29 | 0 | 50 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest income |
4,710 | 4,508 | 9,494 | 8,724 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest on demand deposits |
131 | 158 | 241 | 276 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on savings deposits |
35 | 35 | 71 | 72 | |||||||||||||||
Interest on time deposits |
852 | 1,264 | 1,934 | 2,699 | |||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
4 | 4 | 6 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Other borrowing expense |
129 | 3 | 200 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
1,151 | 1,464 | 2,452 | 3,064 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
3,559 | 3,044 | 7,042 | 5,660 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
200 | 125 | 375 | 190 | |||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for
loan losses |
3,359 | 2,919 | 6,667 | 5,470 | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest income: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
88 | 76 | 156 | 148 | |||||||||||||||
Payroll and benefit processing fees |
82 | 73 | 166 | 147 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings on cash surrender value - |
|||||||||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
60 | 62 | 119 | 123 | |||||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of securities available for sale |
53 | 3 | 76 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Merchant credit card service income, net |
100 | 102 | 195 | 209 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgage brokerage fee income |
59 | 24 | 112 | 66 | |||||||||||||||
Other income |
167 | 118 | 279 | 206 | |||||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
609 | 458 | 1,103 | 901 | |||||||||||||||
Non-interest expense: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and related benefits |
1,355 | 1,120 | 2,654 | 2,142 | |||||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment expense |
341 | 343 | 713 | 696 | |||||||||||||||
FDIC insurance premium |
13 | 12 | 25 | 24 | |||||||||||||||
Data processing fees |
72 | 40 | 89 | 60 | |||||||||||||||
Professional service fees |
196 | 71 | 388 | 171 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation expense |
63 | 59 | 124 | 116 | |||||||||||||||
Directors expense |
58 | 88 | 114 | 148 | |||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
389 | 274 | 696 | 535 | |||||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
2,487 | 2,007 | 4,803 | 3,892 | |||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
1,481 | 1,370 | 2,967 | 2,479 | |||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
596 | 523 | 1,156 | 891 | |||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 885 | $ | 847 | $ | 1,811 | $ | 1,588 | |||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.59 | |||||||||||
Weighted average shares basic |
2,661 | 2,682 | 2,653 | 2,693 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.56 | |||||||||||
Weighted average shares diluted |
2,786 | 2,848 | 2,775 | 2,863 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
REDDING BANCORP & SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
Dollars in thousands | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 1,811 | $ | 1,588 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
375 | 190 | ||||||||||
Provision for depreciation and amortization |
281 | 305 | ||||||||||
Compensation expense associated with stock options |
11 | 34 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of securities available for sale |
(76 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of investment premiums and accretion of
discounts, net |
258 | (3 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on sale of loans |
(74 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales of loans |
947 | 4,087 | ||||||||||
Loans originated for sale |
(873 | ) | (4,183 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of changes in: |
||||||||||||
Other assets |
2,167 | 1,840 | ||||||||||
Deferred loan fees |
(28 | ) | 190 | |||||||||
Other liabilities |
1,378 | 164 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
6,177 | 4,114 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of available for sale securities |
9,791 | 4,175 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities |
8,709 | 13,081 | ||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of held to maturity securities |
599 | 0 | ||||||||||
Purchases of available for sale securities |
(29,858 | ) | (3,550 | ) | ||||||||
Loan originations, net of principal repayments |
(4,928 | ) | (36,077 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment |
(391 | ) | (337 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(16,078 | ) | (22,708 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
16,031 | 12,882 | ||||||||||
Net decrease in securities sold under agreement to repurchase |
(221 | ) | (1,833 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
10,000 | 0 | ||||||||||
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
(15,000 | ) | 0 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of Trust Preferred Securities |
5,000 | 0 | ||||||||||
Common stock transactions, net |
296 | (499 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
16,106 | 10,550 | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
6,205 | (8,044 | ) | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
34,592 | 40,958 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 40,797 | $ | 32,914 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosures: |
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||||||
Income taxes |
$ | 997 | $ | 285 | ||||||||
Interest |
2,429 | 3,072 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
REDDING BANCORP & SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
1. Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Redding Bancorp (the Holding Company) and its subsidiaries Redding Bank of Commerce (RBC or the Bank) and RBC Mortgage. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The financial information contained in this report reflects all adjustments that in the opinion of management are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current financial statement presentation.
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the banking industry. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and revenue and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained in Redding Bancorps 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders. The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the banking industry. The results of operations and cash flows for the 2003 interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of the results for any future interim period or the entire fiscal year.
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, federal funds sold and repurchase agreements. Generally, federal funds are sold for a one-day period and securities purchased under agreements to resell are for no more than a 90-day period.
From 1999 through 2002, merchant credit card services were considered a segment of the Company for reporting purposes. Credit card services are limited to those revenues, net of related data processing costs, associated with the Banks agreement (Merchant Services Agreement) to provide credit and debit card processing services for merchants solicited by an independent sales organization (ISO) and nonbank merchant card processor. The Merchant Services Agreement is described in detail under Merchant Credit Card Processing Services in the companys 2002 Annual report on Form 10-K. As previously reported, the 2001 renewal of the contract with our ISO represented a significant reduction to the earnings on this business segment. The Company is no longer accepting new merchant activity from the ISO and the segment is no longer managed separately from the local merchant activity of the Bank. Due to these changes, the Company no longer considers merchant credit card activity to be a segment.
During the first quarter of 2003, the Company, through its RBC Mortgage Services subsidiary, has entered into an affiliated business arrangement with another entity to provide mortgage loans to customers of Redding Bank of Commerce. RBC Mortgage Services and its affiliate provide mortgage brokerage services, and split all earnings, net of operating costs, equally.
6
REDDING BANCORP & SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
2. Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the entity. The following table displays the computation of earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.
(Amounts in thousands, | |||||||||||||||||
except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Basic EPS Calculation: |
|||||||||||||||||
Numerator (net income) |
$ | 885 | $ | 847 | $ | 1,811 | $ | 1,588 | |||||||||
Denominator (average common
shares outstanding) |
2,661 | 2,682 | 2,653 | 2,693 | |||||||||||||
Basic earnings per Share |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.59 | |||||||||
Diluted EPS Calculation: |
|||||||||||||||||
Numerator (net income) |
$ | 885 | $ | 847 | $ | 1,811 | $ | 1,588 | |||||||||
Denominator: |
|||||||||||||||||
Average common shares outstanding |
2,661 | 2,682 | 2,653 | 2,693 | |||||||||||||
Options |
125 | 166 | 122 | 170 | |||||||||||||
2,786 | 2,848 | 2,775 | 2,863 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per Share |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.56 | |||||||||
3. Stock Option Plans
The Company accounts for its stock option plan under the intrinsic value method in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. As such, compensation expense is recorded only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price on the date of the grant. As required by the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, the Company provides pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for employee stock option grants. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.
7
REDDING BANCORP & SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
||||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 885 | $ | 847 | $ | 1,811 | $ | 1,588 | ||||||||||
Deduct: |
||||||||||||||||||
Total
stock-based
employee
compensation
expense
determined
under fair
value based
method for
all awards,
net of related
tax effects |
(19 | ) | (43 | ) | (38 | ) | (84 | ) | ||||||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 866 | $ | 804 | $ | 1,773 | $ | 1,504 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||||
Basic as reported |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.59 | ||||||||||
Basic pro forma |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.56 | ||||||||||
Diluted as reported |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.65 | $ | 0.56 | ||||||||||
Diluted pro forma |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.64 | $ | 0.53 | ||||||||||
4. Comprehensive Income
The Companys total comprehensive income was as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Net Income as reported |
$ | 885 | $ | 847 | $ | 1,811 | $ | 1,588 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income
net of tax: |
|||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gain on
securities
available for sale |
62 | 254 | 67 | 163 | |||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for
gain on available for sale
securities |
(46 | ) | (2 | ) | (60 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
16 | 252 | 7 | 162 | |||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 901 | $ | 1,099 | $ | 1,818 | $ | 1,762 | |||||||||
5. Junior Subordinated Debentures (Trust Preferred Securities)
During the first quarter 2003, Redding Bancorp formed a wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trust, Redding Bancorp Trust, which issued $5.0 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in Redding Bancorps junior subordinated debentures (the Trust Preferred Securities). These debentures qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines. The proceeds from the issuance of the Trust Preferred Securities were transferred from the Holding Company to the Bank as surplus capital. The Trust Preferred Securities accrue and pay distributions on a quarterly basis at 3 month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.32%. The rate at June 30, 2003 was 4.57%. The rate increase is capped at 2.75% annually and the lifetime cap is 12.5%. The final maturity on the Trust Preferred Securities is March 18, 2033, and the debt allows for prepayment after five years on the quarterly payment date.
8
REDDING BANCORP & SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
6. Commitments and contingent liabilities
Lease Commitments The Company leases certain facilities at which it conducts its operations. Future minimum lease commitments under all non-cancelable operating leases as of June 30, 2003 are below: |
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
2003 |
$ | 148,800 | ||
2004 |
$ | 297,590 | ||
2005 |
$ | 297,590 | ||
2006 |
$ | 303,180 | ||
2007 |
$ | 303,180 | ||
2008 |
$ | 303,180 | ||
Thereafter |
$ | 831,780 | ||
Total |
$ | 2,485,300 | ||
Legal Proceedings The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. These matters have a high degree of uncertainty associated with them. There can be no assurances that all matters that may be brought against the Company are known to us at any point of time. |
9
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward looking statements and risk factors
This discussion and information in the accompanying financial statements contains certain forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated. These risks and uncertainties include the Companys ability to maintain or expand its market share and net interest margins, or to implement its marketing and growth strategies. Further, actual results may be affected by the Companys ability to compete on price and other factors with other financial institutions; customer acceptance of new products and services; and general trends in the banking and the regulatory environment, as they relate to the Companys cost of funds and return on assets. The reader is advised that this list of risks is not exhaustive and should not be construed as any prediction by the Company as to which risks would cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
For additional information concerning risks and uncertainties related to the Company and its operations please refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 under the heading Risk factors that may affect results. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
The following sections discuss significant changes and trends in financial condition, capital resources and liquidity of the Company from December 31, 2002 to June 30, 2003. Also discussed are significant trends and changes in the Companys results of operations for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2003, compared to the same period in 2002. The consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report are condensed and unaudited. The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide greater detail of the Companys financial condition and results.
Overview
Redding Bancorp (the Company) is a financial service holding company (FHC) registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and was incorporated in California on January 21, 1982, for the purpose of organizing, as a wholly owned subsidiary, Redding Bank of Commerce (the Bank). The Company elected to change to a FHC in 2000. As a financial service holding company, the Company is subject to the Financial Holding Company Act and to supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). The Companys principal business is to serve as a holding company for the Bank and RBC Mortgage Services, a California corporation (formerly Redding Service Corporation) and for other banking or banking-related subsidiaries that the Company may establish or acquire.
On January 2, 2003, Redding Service Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the FHC, changed its name to RBC Mortgage Services, an affiliate of Redding Bank of Commerce. The principal business of the subsidiary is mortgage brokerage services. The subsidiary has an affiliated business arrangement with the Bank of Walnut Creek (BWC Mortgage Services). Under the terms of the agreement, BWC Mortgage Services underwrites or brokers mortgage products and manages the independent contractors, supporting staff and broker relationships with various secondary market lenders. RBC Mortgage Services in turn provides office space, equipment and marketing support for the mortgage brokerage services. RBC Mortgage Services, through this agreement, offers a full array of single-family and multi-family residential real estate mortgages including equity lines. Earnings from the mortgage brokerage services, net of operating costs, are split 50% RBC Mortgage Services, 50% BWC Mortgage Services.
Before the formation of the subsidiary, mortgage-banking services were performed as a department of the Bank.
10
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The Companys principal source of income is dividends from its subsidiaries. The Company conducts its corporate business operations at the administrative office of the Bank located at 1951 Churn Creek Road, Redding, California 96002. The Company conducts its business operations in two geographic market areas, Redding and Roseville, California. The Company considers Upstate California to be the major market area of the Bank. The three Internet addresses of the Company are reddingbankofcommerce.com, rosevillebankofcommerce.com, and rbcmortgageservices.com.
The Bank was incorporated as a California banking corporation on November 25, 1981, and received its certificate of authority to begin banking operations on October 22, 1982. The Bank operates four full service branches. The Company established its first full service branch at 1177 Placer Street, Redding, California, and opened for business on October 22, 1982. On November 1, 1988, the Bank received a certificate of authority to establish and maintain a loan production office in Citrus Heights, California. On September 1, 1998, the Company relocated the loan production office to 2400 Professional Drive in Roseville, California.
On March 1, 1994, the Bank received a certificate of authority to open a second full-service branch at 1951 Churn Creek Road in Redding, California. On June 30, 2000, the Bank received a certificate of authority to convert the loan production office in Roseville to a full service banking facility under the name Roseville Bank of Commerce, a division of Redding Bank of Commerce. On June 15, 2001, the Bank acquired the deposit liabilities of FirstPlus Bank at Citrus Heights, California and renamed the facility Roseville Bank of Commerce at Sunrise, a division of Redding Bank of Commerce. On February 22, 2002, the Roseville Bank of Commerce at Eureka Road, a division of Redding Bank of Commerce, relocated to its permanent location at 1504 Eureka Road, Suite 100, Roseville, California.
The Bank is principally supervised and regulated by the California Department of Financial Institutions (DFI) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and conducts a general commercial banking business in the counties of El Dorado, Placer, Shasta, and Sacramento, California.
The services offered by the Bank include those traditionally offered by commercial banks of similar size and character in California, such as checking, interest-bearing checking (NOW) and savings accounts, money market deposit accounts, commercial, real estate, construction, and term loans; travelers checks, safe deposit boxes, collection services and electronic banking activities. The primary focus of the Bank is to provide services to the business and professional community of its major market area, including Small Business Administration loans, payroll and accounting packages, benefit administration and billing services. The Bank does not offer trust services or international banking services and does not plan to do so in the near future.
Most of the Banks customers are small to medium sized businesses, professionals and other individuals with medium to high net worth, and most of the Banks deposits are obtained from such customers. The Bank emphasizes servicing the needs of local businesses and professionals and individuals requiring specialized services. The primary business strategy of the Bank is to focus on its lending activities. The Banks principal lines of lending are (i) commercial, (ii) real estate construction and (iii) commercial and residential real estate. The majority of the loans of the Bank are direct loans made to individuals and small businesses in the major market area of the Bank and are secured by real estate. See Risk Factors That May Affect Results Dependence on Real Estate. A relatively small portion of the loan portfolio of the Bank consists of loans to individuals for personal, family or household purposes. The Bank accepts real estate, listed and unlisted securities, savings and time deposits, automobiles, machinery and equipment and other general business assets such as accounts receivable and inventory as collateral for loans.
The Companys goal is to be a premier provider of financial services to the business and professional community of its major market area including Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, commercial building financing, credit card services, payroll and accounting packages, lockbox and billing programs. The Company measures premier performance by monitoring key operating ratios to high performing peer information on a national level, and model strategies to meet or exceed such goals.
11
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Sources of Income
The Company derives its income from two principal sources: (i) net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income it receives on interest-earning assets and the interest expense it pays on interest-bearing liabilities, and (ii) fee income, which includes fees earned on deposit services, income from SBA lending, electronic-based cash management services, mortgage brokerage fee income and merchant credit card processing services. The income of the Bank depends to a great extent on net interest income. These interest rate factors are highly sensitive to many factors, which are beyond the Companys control, including general economic conditions, inflation, recession, and the policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, in particular, the Federal Reserve Board. Because of the Banks predisposition to variable rate pricing and non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts, the Bank is considered asset sensitive. As a result, the Company is adversely affected by declining interest rates.
Financial Highlights Results of Operations
Net income for the second quarter of 2003 totaled $885,000 an increase of 4.5% from the $847,000 reported for the same quarterly period of 2002. On the same basis, diluted earnings per common share for the second quarter of 2003 were $0.32, compared to $0.30 for the same period of 2002, a 6.7% increase. Return on average assets (ROA) and return on average equity (ROE) for the second quarter of 2003 were 0.95% and 12.01%, respectively, compared with 1.05% and 12.94%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2002.
Net income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003 totaled $1,811,000, an increase of 14.0% over net income reported for the same six-month period ended June 30, 2002. On the same basis, diluted earnings per common share for the six-months ended June 30, 2003 was $0.65, compared to $0.56 for the same six-month period in 2002, a 16.0% increase. ROA was 0.97% and ROE was 11.84% for the first six-months of 2003 compared with 1.21% and 11.29%, respectively, for the same six-month period of 2002.
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin
Net interest income is the primary source of the Companys income. Net interest income represents the excess of interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets (loans, securities and Federal Funds sold) over the interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest margin is net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets. Net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 was $3.6 million compared with $3.0 million for the same period in 2002 an increase of 17.3%. Net interest income for the six-months ended June 30, 2003 was $7.0 million compared with $5.7 million for the same six-month period in 2002, an increase of 24.4%.
Average earning assets for the six-months ended 6/30/03 increased $56.3 million or 19.7% compared with the same period in the prior year. Loans, the largest component of earning assets, increased $52.8 million or 22.5% on average compared with the prior year period. Average securities increased $3.5 million or 6.8% over the prior period. Overall, the yield on earning assets decreased to 5.54% for the six-month period compared to 6.10% for the same period in the prior year, primarily due to declining interest rates. The decline was due to variable loan repricing as well as new loan production at lower rates in the first six-months of 2003 compared with the same six-month period of 2002.
Average interest-bearing liabilities for the six-months ended 6/30/03 increased $41.1 million or 17.1% compared with the prior year period. Of this increase, $25.5 million was in core deposit growth (interest-bearing demand and savings accounts), generally the least expensive deposit categories. Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings increased $16.4 million compared with the prior year period. The Company is using the Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings to supplement loan growth and to leverage into securities to improve the spread in the margin. Borrowings are repaid as core deposit growth increases.
12
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The overall cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the first six-months 2003 was 1.74% compared with 2.55% for the first six-months of 2002, a 31.8% decrease. The decrease was primarily a result of decreases in rates paid on time deposits and low cost short-term borrowings. As time deposits and borrowings matured during the period, the Company was able to roll these investments over at lower rates.
The net effect of the changes discussed above resulted in an increase of $1.4 million or 25.0% in net interest income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003 from the same period in 2002. Net interest margin increased 15 basis points to 4.11% from 3.96% for the same period a year ago.
Liquidity
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure that the Company can efficiently meet the borrowing needs of our customers, withdrawals of our depositors and other cash commitments under both normal operating conditions and under unforeseen and unpredictable circumstances of industry or market stress.
The Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) establishes and monitors liquidity guidelines that require sufficient asset-based liquidity to cover potential funding requirements and to avoid over-dependence on volatile, less reliable funding markets. In addition to the immediately liquid resources of cash and due from banks and federal funds sold, asset liquidity is supported by debt securities in the available for sale security portfolio and wholesale lines of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank and borrowing lines with other financial institutions. Customer core deposits have historically provided the Company with a source of relatively stable and low-cost funds.
The Companys consolidated liquidity position remains adequate to meet short-term and long-term future contingencies. At June 30, 2003, the Company had overnight investments of $13.0 million and available lines of credit of at the Federal Home Loan bank of approximately $79.0 million, and a federal funds borrowing line with a correspondent of $10.0 million.
To accommodate future growth and business needs, the Bank develops an annual capital expenditure budget during strategic planning sessions. Capital expenditures for 2003 are expected to be about $700,000 for additional software and routine replacement of furniture and equipment. Approximately $475,000 has been spent through June 30, 2003. The Company expects that the earnings of the Bank, acquisition of core deposits and wholesale borrowing arrangements are sufficient to support liquidity needs in 2003.
Capital Management
The Company uses capital to fund organic growth, pay dividends and repurchase its shares. The objective of effective capital management is to produce above market long-term returns by using capital when returns are perceived to be high and issuing capital when costs are perceived to be low. The Companys potential sources of capital include retained earnings, common and preferred stock issuance and issuance of subordinated debt and trust preferred securities.
Total shareholder equity increased from December 31, 2002 by $2.1 million to $29.8 million at June 30, 2003. The increase was a result of earnings of $1.8 million, $192,872 from exercises of stock options, including tax benefits, and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $8,000.
13
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Short term borrowings
The Bank actively uses Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances as a source of wholesale funding to support growth strategies as well as to provide liquidity. At June 30, 2003, all of the banks FHLB advances were fixed rate, fixed term borrowings without call or put option features.
At June 30, 2003, the Bank had $13 million in FHLB short-term advances outstanding at an average rate of 1.63% compared to $0 at June 30, 2002.
Provision for loan losses
The Companys most significant management accounting estimate is the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses. The Company follows a methodology for calculating the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses as discussed under Asset Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL) in this document.
During the first quarter 2003, one loan relationship became 90 days past due for interest payments. During the second quarter 2003, management performed an impairment evaluation of the credit relationship and a specific reserve was established for contingencies. Interest payments were brought current. The credit in question totaled $2.9 million at June 30, 2003 and is fully collateralized. The Bank expects to collect all principal and interest due. The Bank has seven other loans to this borrower totaling approximately $1.9 million. These loans are performing in accordance with their original terms, are fully collateralized and the Bank expects to collect all principal and interest due. However, in accordance with its policy, the Bank has classified all eight loans to this borrower and its affiliates.
Provision for loan losses of $375,000 were provided for the six-months ended June 30, 2003 compared with $190,000 for the same period of 2002. Redding Bancorps allowance for loan losses was 1.44% of total loans at June 30, 2003 and 1.31% at June 30, 2002, while its ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.77% at June 30, 2003, compared to 0.0% at June 30, 2002. Year-to-date net charge-offs of $0 compare favorably to net charge-offs of $11,000 in the same period last year.
Factors that may affect future results
As a financial services company, our earnings are significantly affected by general business and economic conditions. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, monetary supply, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the United States economy and local economies in which we operate. For example, an economic downturn, increase in unemployment, or other events that negatively impact household and/or corporate incomes could decrease the demand for the Companys loan and non-loan products and services and increase the number of customers who fail to pay interest or principal on their loans.
Geopolitical conditions can also affect our earnings. Acts or threats of terrorism, actions taken by the United States or other governments in response to acts or threats of terrorism and our military conflicts including the aftermath of the war with Iraq, could impact business conditions in the United States.
14
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Its policies determine in large part our cost of funds for lending and investing and the return we earn on those loans and investments, both of which impact our net interest margin, and can materially affect the value of financial instruments we hold. Its policies can also affect our borrowers, potentially increasing the risk of failure to repay their loans. Changes in Federal Reserve Board policies are beyond our control and hard to predict or anticipate.
We operate in a highly competitive industry that could become even more competitive because of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and continued consolidation. Banks, securities firms and insurance companies can now merge creating a financial holding company that can offer virtually any type of financial service, including banking, securities underwriting, insurance (agency and underwriting) and merchant banking. Technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Many of our competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and some have lower cost structures.
The holding company, subsidiary bank and nonbank subsidiary are heavily regulated at the federal and state levels. This regulation is to protect depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not investors. Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies including changes in interpretation and implementation could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways including limiting the types of financial services and products we may offer. Our failure to comply with the laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies and damage our reputation. For more information, refer to the Supervision and Regulation section in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to adapt our products and services to evolving industry standards. There is increasing pressure on financial services companies to provide products and services at lower prices. This can reduce our net interest margin and revenues from fee-based products and services. In addition, the widespread adoption of new technologies, including internet-based services, could require us to make substantial expenditures to modify or adapt our existing products and services. Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people can be intense.
The holding company is a separate and distinct legal entity from its subsidiaries. It receives substantially all of its revenues from dividends from its subsidiaries. These dividends are the principal source of funds to pay dividends on the holding companys common stock and interest and principal on its debt. Various federal and state laws and regulations limit the amount of dividends that our bank may pay to the holding company. For more information, refer to Dividends and Other Distributions in the Companys 2002 Form 10-K.
Specific Risks to operations in California
Our operations are located entirely in California, which in recent years has experienced economic disruptions that are unique to the state. At the time this report is being prepared, the state legislature has approved a compromised budget for the 2003-04 fiscal year. The compromise does not cut spending nor raise revenues sufficiently to balance the budget, but defers to borrowing to carry the deficit over. We can offer no assurances that the critical impact of the California economic crisis will not have a material adverse affect on our customers or on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued disclosure guidance for critical accounting policies. The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that require application of managements most difficult, subjective or complex judgements, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in future periods.
15
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Our accounting policies are integral to understanding the results reported. Accounting policies are described in detail in Note 2 of the NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS in the Companys 2002 Annual report on Form 10-K. Not all of significant accounting policies presented in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgements or estimates.
Preparation of financial statements
The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates the estimates used. Estimates are based upon historical experience, current economic conditions and other factors that management considers reasonable under the circumstances.
Use of estimates
These estimates result in judgements regarding the carrying values of assets and liabilities when these values are not readily available from other sources, as well as assessing and identifying the accounting treatments of contingencies and commitments. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
The Companys financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The Companys significant accounting policies are presented in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company follows accounting policies typical to the community commercial banking industry and in compliance with various regulations and guidelines as established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Banks primary federal regulator, the FDIC. The following is a brief description of our current accounting policies involving significant management judgements.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Companys most significant management accounting estimate is the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is established to absorb known and inherent losses attributable to loans outstanding and related off-balance sheet commitments. . The adequacy of the reserve is monitored on an on-going basis and is based on managements evaluation of numerous factors. These factors include the quality of the current loan portfolio, the trend in the loan portfolios risk ratings, current economic conditions, loan concentrations, loan growth rates, past-due and non-performing trends, evaluation of specific loss estimates for all significant problem loans, historical charge-off and recovery experience and other pertinent information.
The calculation of the allowance for loan losses is by nature inexact, as the allowance represents Managements best estimate of the loan losses inherent in the Companys credit portfolios at the reporting date. These loan losses will occur in the future, and as such cannot be determined with absolute certainty at the reporting date.
Revenue recognition
The Companys primary sources of revenue are interest income. Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K offers an explanation of the process for determining when the accrual of interest income is discontinued on an impaired loan.
16
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Fixed Assets
Other estimates that the Company uses in its accounting include the expected useful lives of depreciable assets, such as buildings, building improvements, equipment, and furniture. The useful lives of various technological related hardware and software could be subject to change due to advances in technology and the general adoption of new standards for technology or interfaces among computer or telecommunication systems.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company applies Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for stock options. Under APB No. 25, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the Companys stock at the date of grant over the amount the employee or director must pay to acquire the stock. Because the Companys stock option plans provides for the issuance of options at a price of no less than the fair market value at the date of grant, no compensation cost is required to be recognized for the stock option plans.
Had compensation costs for the stock option plans been determined based upon the fair value at the date of grant consistent with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, the Companys net income and earnings per share would have been reduced. The reduction in the Companys net income had compensation costs been determined in accordance with FAS No. 123 would have been $38,000 and $84,000 for the six-months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. There would have been $0.01 per share decrease in diluted earnings per share in 2003 and $0.03 per share decrease in 2002.
The amount of the reduction for the fiscal years 2000 through 2002 is disclosed in Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, based upon the assumptions listed therein. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), itself may change over time, having impact over the reporting of the Companys financial activity. Although the economic substance of the Companys transactions would not change, alterations in GAAP could affect the timing or manner of accounting or reporting.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using currently enacted tax rates applied to such taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. If future income should prove non-existent or less than the amount of deferred tax assets within the tax years to which they may be applied, the asset may not be realized and our net income will be reduced. Our deferred tax assets are described further in Note 11 of the NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS in the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
17
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The following table presents the Companys daily average balance sheet information together with interest income and yields earned on average interest-bearing assets and interest expense and rates paid on average interest-bearing liabilities. Average balances are average daily balances.
Table 1. |
Average Balances, Interest Income/Expense and Yields/Rates Paid (Unaudited, Dollars in thousands) |
Six Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Loans |
$ | 287,594 | $ | 8,913 | 6.20 | % | $ | 234,829 | $ | 7,863 | 6.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt Securities |
1,517 | 32 | 4.22 | % | 3,898 | 81 | 4.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
US Government Securities |
32,897 | 429 | 2.61 | % | 32,886 | 619 | 3.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold |
20,438 | 120 | 1.17 | % | 13,318 | 111 | 1.67 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Securities |
0 | 0 | 0.00 | % | 1,247 | 50 | 8.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Earning Assets |
$ | 342,446 | $ | 9,494 | 5.54 | % | $ | 286,178 | $ | 8,724 | 6.10 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash & Due From Banks |
$ | 20,358 | $ | 19,224 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank Premises |
5,390 | 5,378 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses |
( 3,990 | ) | ( 3,247 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets |
10,170 | 8,698 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Total Assets |
$ | 374,374 | $ | 316,231 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Bearing Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand Interest Bearing |
$ | 91,147 | $ | 241 | 0.53 | % | $ | 74,780 | $ | 276 | 0.74 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Savings Deposits |
22,054 | 71 | 0.64 | % | 17,823 | 72 | 0.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of Deposit |
147,612 | 1,934 | 2.62 | % | 142,648 | 2,699 | 3.78 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
20,323 | 206 | 2.03 | % | 4,816 | 17 | 0.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
281,136 | $ | 2,452 | 1.74 | % | 240,067 | $ | 3,064 | 2.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Non interest Demand |
58,591 | 46,969 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Liabilities |
4,055 | 2,890 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholder Equity |
30,592 | 26,305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity |
$ | 374,374 | $ | 316,231 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin |
$ | 7,042 | 4.11 | % | $ | 5,660 | 3.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
18
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The following tables set forth changes in interest income and expense for each major category of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the amount of change attributable to volume and rate changes for the periods indicated. Changes attributable to rate/volume have been allocated to volume changes.
Table 2. | Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income |
(Dollars in thousands) | June 30, 2003 over June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Increase(Decrease) In Interest
Income |
||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Loans |
$ | 1,639 | $ | (589 | ) | $ | 1,050 | |||||||||||
Tax-exempt Securities |
(50 | ) | 1 | (49 | ) | |||||||||||||
US Government Securities |
(8 | ) | (182 | ) | (190 | ) | ||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold |
42 | (33 | ) | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Other Securities |
(41 | ) | 25 | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total Increase (Decrease) |
$ | 1,582 | $ | (778 | ) | $ | 804 | |||||||||||
Increase(Decrease) In
Interest Expense |
||||||||||||||||||
Interest Bearing Demand |
$ | 44 | $ | (79 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
Savings Deposits |
14 | (15 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Certificates of Deposit |
62 | (827 | ) | (765 | ) | |||||||||||||
Borrowings |
157 | 32 | 189 | |||||||||||||||
Total Increase (Decrease) |
$ | 277 | $ | (889 | ) | $ | (612 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Increase |
$ | 1,305 | $ | 111 | $ | 1,416 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income was $7.0 million for the first six-months of 2003 compared with $5.7 million for the same period in 2002 (Tables 1 and 2). The primary reason for the increase was an increase in the volume of earning assets. Average earning assets for the first six-months of 2003 were $342.4 million compared with $286.2 million for the same period in 2002, an increase of $56.3 million or 19.7%. Portfolio loans is the single largest component of earning assets and average portfolio loans increased $52.8 million or 22.5% over the same period in 2002.
While the average volume of earning assets increased, the average yield decreased from 6.10% in 2002 to 5.54% in 2003. This decrease was due to asset repricing during a period of declining interest rates. Average interest bearing liabilities also increased during the period, to $281.1 million for the first six-months of 2003 compared with $240.1 million for the same period in 2002, a $41.1 million increase or 17.1%. Similar to earning assets, the cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased from 2.55% in 2002 to 1.74% in 2003.
The decrease in the cost of interest bearing liabilities was due to repricing of interest bearing checking and savings accounts as well as the rollover of maturing certificates of deposits at lower rates. As a result of these changes, the interest spread (the difference between the yield on earning assets and the cost of interest bearing liabilities) increased 0.15% to 4.11% for the six-months ended June 30, 2003 compared with the same period in the prior year.
19
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Non-interest Income
The Companys non-interest income consists of service charges on deposit accounts, other fee income, processing fees for credit card payments and gains or losses on security sales. The following table sets forth a summary of noninterest income for the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 88 | $ | 76 | $ | 156 | $ | 148 | |||||||||
Payroll and benefit processing fees |
82 | 73 | 166 | 147 | |||||||||||||
Earnings on cash surrender value -
Bank owned insurance |
60 | 62 | 119 | 123 | |||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of securities available for sale |
53 | 3 | 76 | 2 | |||||||||||||
Merchant credit card service income, net |
100 | 102 | 195 | 209 | |||||||||||||
Mortgage brokerage fee income |
59 | 24 | 112 | 66 | |||||||||||||
Other Income |
167 | 118 | 279 | 206 | |||||||||||||
Total Non-interest income |
$ | 609 | $ | 458 | $ | 1,103 | $ | 901 | |||||||||
Non-interest income increased $151,000 or 33.0% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 over June 30, 2002. Service charges on deposit accounts increased due to growth in core deposits. Other income increased $49,000 or 41.5% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 over June 30, 2002 primarily due to the addition of contract core item processing. Gains on available for sale securities sold during the quarter increased by $50,000 over the same quarterly period a year ago. Mortgage brokerage fee income increased by 145.8% or $35,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 over June 30, 2002. Increases are attributed to the rising volumes of refinance and new purchase mortgages being processed through RBC Mortgage Services.
Non-interest income increased by $202,000 or 22.4% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003 over the same six-month period in 2002. Gains in other income are attributed to the core item processing agreement in which the Bank is paid a fee for data processing services supplied to another independent bank. Approximately $5.0 million in Mortgage-backed securities were sold during the period due to accelerating prepayment speeds. Gains on securities sold were $76,000 for the first six-months of June 2003 compared with $2,000 in the first six-months of 2002. Mortgage brokerage fee income increased by 69.7% or $46,000 over the same six-month period a year ago. Increases in mortgage brokerage fee income are attributed to the rising volumes of refinance and new purchase mortgages being processed through RBC Mortgage Services.
Non-interest Expense
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||
Non-interest Expense |
|||||||||||||||||
Salaries and related benefits |
$ | 1,355 | $ | 1,120 | $ | 2,654 | $ | 2,142 | |||||||||
Occupancy and equipment expense |
341 | 343 | 713 | 696 | |||||||||||||
FDIC insurance premium |
13 | 12 | 25 | 24 | |||||||||||||
Data processing fees |
72 | 40 | 89 | 60 | |||||||||||||
Professional service fees |
196 | 71 | 388 | 171 | |||||||||||||
Deferred compensation expense |
63 | 59 | 124 | 116 | |||||||||||||
Directors expense |
58 | 88 | 114 | 148 | |||||||||||||
Other expenses |
389 | 274 | 696 | 535 | |||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 2,487 | $ | 2,007 | $ | 4,803 | $ | 3,892 | |||||||||
20
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Non-interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 was $2.5 million, an increase of $480,000 or 23.9% over the same period a year ago. Salaries and employee benefits increased $235,000 or 21.0% over the same period a year ago. Increases to benefits include a 40.9% increase in group health coverage and a 99.4% increase workers compensation insurance expense. Group health and California workers compensation insurance increases are reflective of the current economic market for insurance coverage in California.
Professional service expense increased $105,000 or 147.9% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 over the quarter ended June 30, 2002. Professional service expense consists of assessments, audit expenses, legal expenses and other outside services. Audit expenses increased $106,000 or 150.0% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 over the prior quarter ended June 30, 2002 because of overall increasing costs for such services. Other outside services increased $54,000 or 131.7% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 over the quarter ended June 30, 2002 as a result of new consulting contracts intended to provide insight into the Companys efficiency and technology uses.
Other expenses increased $115,000 or 42.0% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 over the quarter ended June 30, 2002. Included in other expenses, correspondent service charges increased $44,000. The increase is related to volume increases in check and automated clearinghouse processing fees due for services provided by correspondents. All other expenses show modest increases over prior periods reflective of growth.
Non-interest expense for the six-months ended June 30, 2003 was $4.8 million, an increase of $911,000 or 23.4% over the same six-month period a year ago. Salaries and employee benefits increased $512,000 or 23.9% over the same six-month period a year ago.
Professional service expense increased $217,000 or 126.9% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003 over the six-month period ended June 30, 2002 relating to increased audit and consulting expenses related to efficiency studies, technology enhancements and increased risk assessments pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate varies with changes in the relative amounts of its non-taxable income and non-deductible expenses. The increase in the Companys tax provision is attributable to decreases in non-taxable income related to a reduction in the municipal security portfolio and reclassification of enterprise zone qualified credits.
The following table reflects the Companys tax provision and the related effective tax rate for the periods indicated.
(Dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Income Taxes | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||
Tax provision |
$ | 596 | $ | 523 | $ | 1,156 | $ | 891 | ||||||||
Effective tax rate |
40.2 | % | 38.2 | % | 39.0 | % | 35.9 | % | ||||||||
The Companys provision for income taxes includes both federal and state income taxes and reflects the application of federal and state statutory rates to the Companys net income before taxes. The principal difference between statutory tax rates and the Companys effective tax rate is the benefit derived from investing in tax-exempt securities and enterprise zone qualifying loans. Increases and decreases in the provision for taxes reflect changes in the Companys net income before tax.
Income tax expense through the second quarter 2003 was $596,000 as compared to $523,000 for the second quarter period in 2002. The increase in tax expense is attributed to increased revenues and a reduction in tax-exempt income on municipal securities.
21
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
Asset Quality
The Company concentrates its lending activities primarily within in El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento and Shasta Counties, California, and the location of the Banks four full service branches, specifically identified as Upstate California.
The Company manages its credit risk through diversification of its loan portfolio and the application of underwriting policies and procedures and credit monitoring practices. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a significant portion of its borrowers ability to repay the loans is dependent upon the professional services and commercial real estate development industry sectors. Generally, the loans are secured by real estate or other assets and are expected to be repaid from the cash flows of the borrower or proceeds from the sale of collateral.
The following table sets forth the amounts of loans outstanding by category as of the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Portfolio Loans | June 30, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | |||||||
Commercial and financial |
$ | 109,119 | $ | 99,084 | |||||
Real estate-construction |
54,836 | 40,662 | |||||||
Real estate-commercial |
124,193 | 143,336 | |||||||
Installment |
652 | 720 | |||||||
Other loans |
580 | 662 | |||||||
Less: |
|||||||||
Net deferred loan fees |
(544 | ) | (584 | ) | |||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(4,168 | ) | (3,793 | ) | |||||
Total net loans |
$ | 284,668 | $ | 280,087 | |||||
The Companys practice is to place an asset on nonaccrual status when one of the following events occur: (i) any installment of principal or interest is 90 days or more past due (unless in managements opinion the loan is well secured and in the process of collection). (ii) Management determines the ultimate collection of principal or interest to be unlikely or (iii) the terms of the loan have been renegotiated due to a serious weakening of the borrowers financial condition. Nonperforming loans are loans that are on nonaccrual, are 90 days past due and still accruing or have been restructured.
Net portfolio loans increased $4,581,000 or 1.6% at June 30, 2003 over $280,087,000 at December 31, 2002. The portfolio mix reflects a decrease in commercial real estate reflective of managements strategy to reduce the dependence on commercial real estate through pay downs. The balance of the portfolio remains relatively consistent with the mix at December 31, 2002, with commercial and financial loans of approximately 38%, real estate construction of 19% and commercial real estate at 44%. Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable that the Bank will not be able to collect all amounts due and payable. The Bank had outstanding balances of $2,959,486 and $6,818 in impaired loans that had impairment allowances of $500,000 and $1,023 as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
22
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The following table sets forth a summary of the Companys nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated:
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Non performing assets | June 30, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | ||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 2,959 | $ | 0 | ||||
90 days past due and still
accruing interest |
0 | 7 | ||||||
2,959 | 7 | |||||||
Other Real Estate Owned |
0 | 338 | ||||||
Total non performing assets |
$ | 2,959 | $ | 345 | ||||
Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL)
The Company makes provisions to the ALL on a regular basis through charges to operations that are reflected in the Companys statements of income as a provision for loan losses. When a loan is deemed uncollectible, it is charged against the allowance. Any recoveries of previously charged-off loans are credited back to the allowance. There is no precise method of predicting specific losses or amounts that ultimately may be charged-off on particular categories of the loan portfolio.
Similarly, the adequacy of the ALL and the level of the related provision for possible loan losses is determined on a judgment basis by management based on consideration of (i) economic conditions, (ii) borrowers financial condition, (iii) loan impairment, (iv) evaluation of industry trends, (v) industry and other concentrations, (vi) loans which are contractually current as to payment terms but demonstrate a higher degree of risk as identified by management, (vii) continuing evaluation of the performing loan portfolio, (viii) monthly review and evaluation of problem loans identified as having loss potential, (ix) monthly review by the Board of Directors, and (x) assessments by regulators and other third parties. Management and the Board of Directors evaluate the allowance and determine its desired level considering objective and subjective measures, such as knowledge of the borrowers business, valuation of collateral, the determination of impaired loans and exposure to potential losses.
The ALL is a general reserve available against the total loan portfolio. It is maintained without any interallocation to the categories of the loan portfolio, and the entire allowance is available to cover loan losses. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of the examination process, periodically review the Banks ALL. Such agencies may require the Bank to provide additions to the allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination. Accordingly, it is not possible to predict the effect future economic trends may have on the level of the provision for possible loan losses in future periods.
The ALL should not be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs in future periods will occur in the stated amounts or proportions.
The adequacy of the ALL is calculated using three components. First is the dollar weighted risk rating of the loan portfolio, including all outstanding loans and leases and commitments to lend. Every extension of credit is assigned a risk rating based upon a comprehensive definition intended to measure the inherent risk of lending money. Each rating has an assigned risk factor expressed as a reserve percentage. In determining the assigned risk (reserve) percentage management takes into account the five-year historical loss record of the bank, the current portfolio mix, growth rates, and loan concentrations.
Secondly, established specific reserves are available for individual loans currently on management watch, special mention, and substandard loan lists. These are the estimated potential losses associated with specific borrowers based upon the collateral and event(s) causing the risk rating.
The third component is an assessment of current economic conditions in our market areas. This reserve is for qualitative factors that may effect the portfolio as a whole, such as those factors described above.
23
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the activity in the ALL reserves for the periods indicated.
(Dollars in thousands) | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||
Beginning balance for Loan Losses |
$ | 3,963 | $ | 3,232 | $ | 3,793 | $ | 3,180 | ||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses |
200 | 125 | 375 | 190 | ||||||||||||
Charge offs: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
(0 | ) | (3 | ) | (7 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||
Real Estate |
(0 | ) | (0 | ) | 0 | (18 | ) | |||||||||
Other |
(0 | ) | (0 | ) | 0 | (0 | ) | |||||||||
Total Charge offs |
(0 | ) | (3 | ) | (7 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
5 | 5 | 7 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Real Estate |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
Total Recoveries |
5 | 5 | 7 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 4,168 | $ | 3,359 | $ | 4.168 | $ | 3,159 | ||||||||
ALL to total loans |
1.44 | % | 1.31 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.31 | % | ||||||||
Net Charge offs to average loans |
0.00 | % | 0.01 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.01 | % | ||||||||
Securities Portfolio
Total available-for-sale securities increased $11.2 million or 34.6% for the six-months of 2003. Purchases were primarily in the U.S. Government sector with a moderate increase in tax-exempt municipal purchases.
Approximately $8.6 million in available-for-sale securities were sold during the period posting a gain on sale of $76,000. The sale occurred to balance accelerated prepayment risk in the U.S. Government portfolio.
24
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
The Company considers interest rate, credit and operation risk as the most significant risks affecting the Company. Other types of market risk, such as foreign exchange risk and commodity price risk, do not affect the Company in the normal course of operations.
Fluctuation in interest rates will ultimately affect both the level of interest income and interest expense recorded as revenue. The fundamental objective of the Companys management of its assets and liabilities is to enhance the economic value of the Company while maintaining adequate liquidity and an exposure to interest rate risk deemed acceptable by the Companys management.
To estimate the effect of interest rate shock on the Companys net interest income, management uses a model to prepare an analysis of interest rate risk. Such analysis calculates the change in net interest income given a change in the federal funds rate of 100 basis points up or down. All changes are measured in dollars and are compared to projected net interest income.
At June 30, 2003, the estimated annualized reduction in net interest income attributable to a 50 and 100 basis point decline in the federal funds rate was $460,000 and $903,000, respectively. (A similar and opposite result attributable to a 100 basis point increase in the federal funds rate.) At December 31, 2002, the estimated annualized reduction in net interest income attributable to a 100 and 200 basis point decline in the federal funds rate was $769,000 and $1,538,000, respectively, with a similar and opposite result attributable to a 100 basis point increase in the federal funds rate.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As required by SEC rules, within 90 days prior to the date of this Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer and with the Companys Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer along with the Companys Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in this Form 10-Q.
There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls, or in other factors, which would significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date the Company carried out its evaluation.
25
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal proceedings
The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that the ultimate disposition of all currently pending matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
Item 2. Changes in securities and use of proceeds
N/A
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
N/A.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a vote of Security Holders
The Annual Shareholder meeting of the Registrant was held on May 20, 2003.
2,125,403 shares or 80% of the outstanding voting stock was available for quorum.
2,095,835 or 78.9% voted for the amendment of the corporate bylaws to expand the director seats from no less than seven (7) and no more than eleven (11).
2,125,403 or 80% of the shares voted for all ten of the directors presented in the proxy. No shares voted against and 529,063 shares were not voted.
Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche as independent auditors of the company passed with a majority in favor with 79% of outstanding shares.
Item 5. Other Information
N/A
Item 6A. Exhibits
(31) Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(32) Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Item 6B. Reports on Form 8-K
Form 8-K dated April 24, 2003 announcing 1st Quarter earnings.
Form 8-K dated August 5, 2003 announcing 2nd Quarter earnings.
SIGNATURES
Following the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
REDDING BANCORP
(Registrant)
Date: | August 5, 2003 | /s/ Linda J. Miles Linda J. Miles Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
26