Form 10-Q
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 000-26521
Delaware
|
94-3334199 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
5858 Horton St., Suite 350, Emeryville, CA 94608
(510) 985-7400
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants Common Stock as of April 29, 2003 was 43,400,414.
The Exhibit Index begins on page 42.
ASK JEEVES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1.
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements: | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 | 4 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 | 5 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 | 6 | |||||
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 7 | |||||
Item 2.
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 14 | ||||
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk | 37 | ||||
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures | 37 | ||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings | 38 | ||||
Item 2.
|
Change in Securities | 38 | ||||
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 38 | ||||
Item 4.
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Securities Holders | 38 | ||||
Item 5.
|
Other Information | 38 | ||||
Item 6.
|
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 38 | ||||
Signatures | 39 | |||||
Certifications | 40, 41 |
2
Cautionary Note regarding Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are those that predict or describe future events or trends and that do not relate solely to historical matters. You can generally identify forward-looking statements as statements containing the words believe, expect, will, anticipate, intend, estimate, project, assume or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. All statements in this report regarding our future strategy, future operations, projected financial position, estimated future revenues, projected costs, future prospects, and results that might be obtained by pursuing managements current plans and objectives are forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements because the matters they describe are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other unpredictable factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our forward-looking statements are based on the information currently available to us and speak only as of the date on which this report was filed with the SEC. We expressly disclaim any obligation to issue any updates or revisions to our forward-looking statements, even if subsequent events cause our expectations to change regarding the matters discussed in those statements. Over time, our actual results, performance or achievements will likely differ from the anticipated results, performance or achievements that are expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements, and such difference might be significant and materially adverse to our stockholders. Many important factors that could cause such a difference are described in this Quarterly Report under the caption Risk Factors as well as in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K under the captions Competition, Proprietary Rights and Risk Factors, all of which you should review carefully. Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of those risks as you read this report.
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
ASK JEEVES, INC.
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Note 1) | |||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||
Current assets:
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 31,848 | $ | 27,613 | ||||||
Marketable securities
|
7,289 | 5,762 | ||||||||
Restricted cash and marketable securities
|
11,065 | 11,065 | ||||||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities
|
50,202 | 44,440 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net
|
9,436 | 9,554 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
2,679 | 2,634 | ||||||||
Total current assets
|
62,317 | 56,628 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
10,127 | 11,306 | ||||||||
Intangible assets, net
|
2,419 | 2,948 | ||||||||
Other long-term assets
|
1,275 | 1,294 | ||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 76,138 | $ | 72,176 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
||||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
$ | 10,326 | $ | 8,487 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and related expenses
|
3,772 | 4,163 | ||||||||
Accrued restructuring costs
|
2,060 | 1,907 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue
|
9,242 | 10,790 | ||||||||
Deferred gain on joint venture
|
| 6,226 | ||||||||
Borrowings under line of credit
|
11,000 | 11,000 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities
|
36,400 | 42,573 | ||||||||
Other liabilities
|
326 | 326 | ||||||||
Total liabilities
|
36,726 | 42,899 | ||||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||||
Stockholders equity:
|
||||||||||
Convertible preferred stock, $.001 par value;
5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding
|
| | ||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares
authorized; 42,871,824 and 41,418,334 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002,
respectively
|
728,021 | 725,366 | ||||||||
Deferred stock compensation
|
(5 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(689,044 | ) | (696,735 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
440 | 653 | ||||||||
Total stockholders equity
|
39,412 | 29,277 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$ | 76,138 | $ | 72,176 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ASK JEEVES, INC.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, 2003 | March 31, 2002 | ||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||
Web Properties
|
$ | 21,584 | $ | 10,804 | |||||
Jeeves Solutions(1)
|
3,578 | 5,273 | |||||||
Total revenues
|
25,162 | 16,077 | |||||||
Cost of revenues:
|
|||||||||
Web Properties
|
5,038 | 3,699 | |||||||
Jeeves Solutions
|
1,190 | 2,046 | |||||||
Total cost of revenues
|
6,228 | 5,745 | |||||||
Gross profit
|
18,934 | 10,332 | |||||||
Operating expenses:
|
|||||||||
Product development
|
4,296 | 5,774 | |||||||
Sales and marketing
|
8,169 | 10,033 | |||||||
General and administrative
|
4,281 | 4,146 | |||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
| 2,231 | |||||||
Restructuring costs
|
466 | | |||||||
Total operating expenses
|
17,212 | 22,184 | |||||||
Operating income (loss)
|
1,722 | (11,852 | ) | ||||||
Gain on acquisition of joint venture
|
6,124 | 974 | |||||||
Interest and other income, net
|
180 | 439 | |||||||
Net income (loss) before income tax provision
|
8,026 | (10,439 | ) | ||||||
Income tax provision
|
335 | | |||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 7,691 | $ | (10,439 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) per share:
|
|||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.18 | $ | (0.26 | ) | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.16 | $ | (0.26 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||
Basic
|
42,197,514 | 39,517,426 | |||||||
Diluted
|
48,619,325 | 39,517,426 | |||||||
(1) Revenues from related parties
|
$ | 1,131 | $ | 2,772 | |||||
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ASK JEEVES, INC.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||
Operating activities
|
||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 7,691 | $ | (10,439 | ) | |||||
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
2,026 | 2,419 | ||||||||
Stock-based compensation
|
34 | 41 | ||||||||
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets
|
529 | 563 | ||||||||
Impairment charge for long-lived assets
|
| 2,231 | ||||||||
Gain on acquisition of joint venture
|
(6,124 | ) | (974 | ) | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
118 | (477 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(26 | ) | (436 | ) | ||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
2,072 | (3,068 | ) | |||||||
Accrued compensation and related expenses
|
452 | (536 | ) | |||||||
Accrued restructuring costs
|
153 | (16,916 | ) | |||||||
Deferred revenue
|
(1,548 | ) | (2,445 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
|
5,377 | (30,037 | ) | |||||||
Investing activities
|
||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(847 | ) | (438 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of marketable securities
|
(1,544 | ) | | |||||||
Redemption of restricted marketable securities
|
| 13,700 | ||||||||
Redemption of marketable securities
|
| 5,319 | ||||||||
Business combinations, net of cash
|
(102 | ) | 5,481 | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
|
(2,493 | ) | 24,062 | |||||||
Financing activities
|
||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
1,780 | 748 | ||||||||
Repayment of capital lease obligations
|
(233 | ) | (220 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
1,547 | 528 | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
(196 | ) | 14 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
|
4,235 | (5,433 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
27,613 | 33,125 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 31,848 | $ | 27,692 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing
and financing activities
|
||||||||||
Common stock issued for acquisition of joint
venture
|
$ | | $ | 1,250 | ||||||
Interest paid
|
$ | 821 | $ | 183 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
ASK JEEVES, INC.
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company |
Ask Jeeves, Inc. (Ask Jeeves or the Company) is a provider of Web-based search and self-service technologies. The Company creates a search experience focused on understanding users specific needs and interests and connecting them to the most relevant information, products and services.
The Companys Web Properties division administers its own Web site search results at Ask.com, Ask.co.uk, Teoma.com and AJKids.com. It generates revenue in two ways: first by offering advertisers a variety of targeted tools for promoting their products to the Companys broad user base; and second, by syndicating its search results and ad products to third party Web sites, including portals, infomediaries, and content and destination Web sites.
The Companys Jeeves Solutions division offers software and services to its corporate customers. Jeeves Solutions core software application, JeevesOne, allows corporate customers to add its intuitive search engine to their corporate Internet or intranet sites. With the purchase of additional modules, JeevesOne allows users to search and access a variety of linked enterprise systems and legacy databases. With the addition of Jeeves Analytics, the Companys corporate customers can learn about their users behavior, interests and usage trends so as to serve the needs of their customers.
The Company was incorporated in California in June 1996 and reincorporated in Delaware in June 1999.
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Investments in the Ask Jeeves Japan joint venture in which the Company has significant influence but does not have a controlling interest are accounted for under the equity method and investments in which the Company does not have the ability to exert significant influence are accounted for at cost. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2003 and for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 are unaudited but include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the consolidated financial position, operating results and cash flows as of the interim date and for the periods presented. Results for the interim period ended March 31, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year or future periods. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2002 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Net Income (Loss) Per Share |
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and warrants. Potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, as their effect is antidilutive.
Stock-based Compensation |
The Company accounts for employee stock options using the intrinsic value method and makes the required pro forma disclosures as if the fair value method had been used. Compensation expense based on the difference, if any, on the measurement date (generally the date of grant) between the estimated fair value of the Companys stock and the exercise price of options to purchase that stock is amortized over the vesting period of the related option using the graded vesting method.
Had compensation cost for the Companys stock-based compensation plans been determined using the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans, calculated using the Black Scholes valuation model, the Companys net income (loss) and basic and diluted net income (loss) per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, 2003 | March 31, 2002 | ||||||||
Net income(loss), as reported
|
$ | 7,691 | $ | (10,439 | ) | ||||
Deduct:
|
|||||||||
Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for ESPP
|
(107 | ) | (69 | ) | |||||
Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for stock options
|
(1,590 | ) | (605 | ) | |||||
Net income(loss), pro forma
|
$ | 5,994 | $ | (11,113 | ) | ||||
Net income(loss) per share:
|
|||||||||
Basic, as reported
|
$ | 0.18 | $ | (0.26 | ) | ||||
Basic, pro forma
|
$ | 0.14 | $ | (0.28 | ) | ||||
Diluted, as reported
|
$ | 0.16 | $ | (0.26 | ) | ||||
Diluted, pro forma
|
$ | 0.12 | $ | (0.28 | ) |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (or, FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (or, SFAS) No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit and Disposal Activities. This statement supercedes the accounting for exit and disposal activities under Emerging Issues Task Force (or, EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity. Commitment to a plan to exit an activity or dispose of long-lived assets is no longer sufficient to record a one-time charge for most anticipated costs. Instead, SFAS 146 requires exit or disposal costs be recorded when they are incurred and can be measured at fair value. SFAS 146 further requires that the recorded liability be adjusted for changes in estimated cash flows. The
8
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
provisions of SFAS 146 are effective prospectively for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Previously issued financial statements cannot be restated for the effect of the provisions of SFAS 146 and liabilities previously recorded under EITF Issue No. 94-3 are grandfathered. The Company adopted SFAS 146 on January 1, 2003 and it did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In November 2002, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. EITF Issue No. 00-21 provides guidance on how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services and/or rights to use assets. The provisions of EITF Issue No. 00-21 will apply to revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not believe EITF Issue No. 00-21 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
During November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34 (FIN 45). FIN 45 elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements regarding its obligations under guarantees issued. It also clarifies that at the time a guarantee is issued, the guarantor must recognize an initial liability for the fair value of the obligations it assumes under the guarantee and must disclose that information in its financial statements. The initial recognition and measurement provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, and the disclosure requirements apply to guarantees outstanding as of December 31, 2002. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 45 as of January 1, 2003. See further discussion regarding indemnifications in Note 3.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Transition and Disclosure. This statement amends Statement 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, Statement 148 amends the disclosure requirements of Statement 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company adopted Statement 148 effective January 1, 2003.
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. The interpretation defines variable interest entities as those in which equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties, or entities in which equity investors lack certain essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the party that absorbs a majority of the entitys expected losses, receives a majority of its expected residual returns, or both, as a result of holding variable interests, which are the ownership, contractual, or other pecuniary interests in an entity. The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate the financial position and results of operations of the variable interest entity. The interpretation applies immediately to interests in variable interest entities acquired after January 31, 2003 and for the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003 for interests previously acquired in such entities. The Company believes that adoption of this statement will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
9
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Reclassifications |
Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications did not affect previously reported net income or loss.
2. ACQUISITION OF ASK JEEVES UK
In February 2002, the Company acquired the entire outstanding equity interests in Ask Jeeves UK. Previously, the Company held a fifty percent interest in Ask Jeeves UK, a joint venture partnership with Carlton Communications PLC and Granada Media Group Limited, that was formed to market the Companys search and self-service technologies and services in the United Kingdom. The Company acquired full ownership of Ask Jeeves UK to enhance the synergies that exist between the U.S. and U.K. operations. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination and accordingly, the consolidated financial statements include the operating results of Ask Jeeves UK from the date of acquisition.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company recognized a gain of $6.1 million in connection with this transaction. This amount represents the fair value of net assets the Company recorded in excess of the consideration paid upon the acquisition of the remaining outstanding equity interests in its joint venture which were deferred due to a contingent payment obligation in the Companys agreement with its former partners. The gain was recognized as other income when the contingent payment obligation to the former partners expired in March 2003.
During the first quarter of 2002, the Company recognized a gain of $974,000 representing the remaining balance of deferred license fees paid to it by Ask Jeeves UK, for a licensing arrangement that was terminated when the Company acquired the entity. The gain was recognized as other income.
3. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, the Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged infringement of patents, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property rights, and a variety of claims arising in connection with the services, such as claims alleging defamation or invasion of privacy.
Third parties may assert infringement claims against us. From time to time in the ordinary course of business we have been, and we expect to continue to be, subject to claims of alleged infringement of the trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties. These claims and any resultant litigation, should it occur, could subject us to significant liability for damages. In addition, even if we prevail, litigation could be time-consuming and expensive to defend, and could result in the diversion of our time and attention. Any claims from third parties may also result in limitations on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims unless we are able to enter into agreements with the third parties making these claims.
On October 25, 2001, a putative class action lawsuit captioned Leonard Turroff, et al. vs Ask Jeeves, Inc., et al. was filed against the Company and two of the Companys officers and directors (collectively the Individual Defendants) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Also named as defendants were Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Goldman Sachs & Co., U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, and Dain Rauscher, Inc., the underwriters of the Companys initial public offering. The complaint alleges violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 against all defendants, and violations of Section 15 of the Securities Act against the Individual Defendants in
10
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
connection with the Companys initial public offering (IPO). An amended complaint was filed on December 6, 2001, which includes the same allegations in connection with Ask Jeeves secondary offering in March 2000. The complaints seek unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of common stock between June 30, 1999 and December 6, 2000. The Company believes the claims are without merit and intends to defend the actions vigorously.
On May 2, 2002, a stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, titled Brenner v. Strauch et al. The lawsuit purported to be filed on behalf of the Company, asserting claims against the officers and directors at the time of the Companys IPO. Also named as defendants were Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., and FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, the underwriters of the Companys IPO. The complaint alleged breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, an unjust enrichment of the named officers and directors, for acquiescing and/or conspiring with the underwriter defendants in underpricing the IPO. Upon Defendants motion, the lawsuit was transferred to the U.S. District Court in Northern California. On October 31, 2002, the Court dismissed the lawsuit, with prejudice. The plaintiff has appealed and the case has been consolidated with similar derivative actions. Appellate briefing will occur from late March to early May 2003.
In managements opinion, resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Companys results of operation, cash flows or financial position. However, depending on the amount and timing, an unfavorable resolution of these matters could materially and adversely affect the Companys future results of operations, cash flows or financial position in a future period.
Indemnifications
While the Company has various guarantees included in contracts in the normal course of business, primarily in the form of indemnities, these guarantees do not represent significant commitments or contingent liabilities of the indebtedness of others. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded a liability related to indemnification provisions.
4. RESTRUCTURING
In the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the Company implemented certain restructuring actions to better align its cost structure with the current and anticipated levels of business activities. These actions resulted in restructuring charges of approximately $466,000 relating to workforce reductions totaling 31 positions. These charges included employee termination costs consisting of wage continuation, advance notice pay, medical benefits, and outplacement costs. As of March 31, 2003, all of the affected employees had been notified and the terminations were either completed or will be completed within 60 days of the notification date. The following table sets forth the restructuring activity during the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively (in thousands).
Accrued | Accrued | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring | Restructuring | ||||||||||||||||
Costs, | Restructuring | Costs, | |||||||||||||||
Beginning of Period | Charges | Cash Paid | End of Period | ||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31,
2003
|
|||||||||||||||||
Facility exit costs
|
$ | 1,883 | $ | | $ | (187 | ) | $ | 1,696 | ||||||||
Severance and professional fees
|
24 | 466 | (126 | ) | 364 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,907 | $ | 466 | $ | (313 | ) | $ | 2,060 | ||||||||
11
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accrued | Accrued | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring | Restructuring | ||||||||||||||||
Costs, | Restructuring | Costs, | |||||||||||||||
Beginning of Period | Charges | Cash Paid | End of Period | ||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31,
2002
|
|||||||||||||||||
Facility exit costs
|
$ | 18,119 | $ | | $ | (16,698 | ) | $ | 1,421 | ||||||||
Severance and professional fees
|
310 | | (218 | ) | 92 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 18,429 | $ | | $ | (16,916 | ) | $ | 1,513 | ||||||||
5. LINE OF CREDIT
The Company has a revolving line of credit with a bank in the amount of $15.0 million. The line of credit expires on July 1, 2003, unless extended. Borrowings under the line of credit bear fixed rate interest from the date of borrowing at LIBOR plus 0.5% (2.6% at March 31, 2003). All borrowings are collateralized by an equal amount of the Companys marketable securities. Borrowings under the line are subject to various covenants. As of March 31, 2003, $11.0 million was outstanding under the line of credit. Additionally, standby letters of credit of approximately $65,000, which are being maintained as security for performance under various obligations, were issued and outstanding under the line of credit.
6. BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
For management reporting purposes, the Company is divided into two business segments, Web Properties and Jeeves Solutions. Results of operations for these business divisions include revenues, cost of revenues, gross profit and operating income (loss) information as provided to the Companys Chief Executive Officer (CEO), who is the Chief Operating Decision Maker. Summarized financial information by segment for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, as reported to the CEO is as follows (in thousands):
Web | Jeeves | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended: | Properties | Solutions | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 21,584 | $ | 3,578 | $ | | $ | 25,162 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
5,038 | 1,190 | | 6,228 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
$ | 16,546 | $ | 2,388 | $ | | $ | 18,934 | ||||||||
Segment income (loss) from operations
|
$ | 4,422 | $ | (1,057 | ) | $ | | $ | 3,365 | |||||||
Unallocated corporate operating expense
|
| | (1,643 | ) | (1,643 | ) | ||||||||||
Total operating income
|
$ | 1,722 | ||||||||||||||
12
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Web | Jeeves | |||||||||||||||
Three months ended: | Properties | Solutions | Other | Total | ||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2002
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 10,804 | $ | 5,273 | $ | | $ | 16,077 | ||||||||
Cost of revenues
|
3,699 | 2,046 | | 5,745 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
$ | 7,105 | $ | 3,227 | $ | | $ | 10,332 | ||||||||
Segment loss from operations
|
$ | (4,847 | ) | $ | (4,170 | ) | $ | | $ | (9,017 | ) | |||||
Unallocated corporate operating expense
|
| | (2,835 | ) | (2,835 | ) | ||||||||||
Total operating loss
|
$ | (11,852 | ) | |||||||||||||
The Company provides its search and self-service technologies services internationally both directly and through its joint ventures. Attribution of revenues by geographic region is based on the country in which the customer is domiciled. Geographic information on revenue is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, 2003 | March 31, 2002 | ||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||
North America
|
$ | 18,049 | $ | 11,162 | |||||
United Kingdom
|
5,982 | 3,784 | |||||||
Japan
|
1,131 | 1,131 | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 25,162 | $ | 16,077 | |||||
Included in revenues are amounts from related parties of $1,131,000 and $2,772,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
8. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, 2003 | March 31, 2002 | |||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 7,691 | $ | (10,439 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on investments
|
(17 | ) | (242 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
(196 | ) | 14 | |||||||
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
$ | 7,478 | $ | (10,667 | ) | |||||
13
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Forward-Looking Statements
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All statements in the following discussion that are not reports of historical information or descriptions of current accounting policy are forward-looking statements. Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of the risks referred to in this reports introductory cautionary note.
OVERVIEW
Ask Jeeves provides Web-based search and self-service technologies. We create a search experience focused on understanding users specific needs and interests and connecting them to the most relevant information, products and services.
Our Web Properties division administers our own Web search sites results at Ask.com, Ask.co.uk, Teoma.com and AJKids.com. It generates revenue in two ways: first, by offering advertisers a variety of targeted and effective tools for promoting their products to our broad user base and second, by syndicating our search results and ad products to third party Web sites, including portals, infomediaries, and content and destination Web sites. Types of advertising range from banner ads to more advanced keyword products, in which we receive a fee for either displays or our click-throughs on a link to an advertisers product offering in response to users pertinent questions. We believe the combination of our broad user base and our comprehensive suite of keyword targeted advertising products enables us to offer advertisers an efficient and effective method of reaching online audiences.
Our Jeeves Solutions division offers software and services to our corporate customers. Jeeves Solutions core software application, JeevesOne, allows corporate customers to add our intuitive search engine to their corporate Internet or intranet sites. With the purchase of additional modules JeevesOne allows users to search and access a variety of linked enterprise systems and legacy databases. With the addition of Jeeves Analytics, our corporate customers can learn about their users behavior, interests and usage trends so as to better serve the needs of their customers and reduce overall customer support costs. We believe our Jeeves Solutions technology and service offerings increase user satisfaction while enabling our corporate customers to increase sales revenue and retain customers.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which are known as GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions were made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected. Our accounting policies that we believe are the most critical to a full understanding and evaluation of our reported financial results include those relating to:
| revenue; | |
| allowances for doubtful accounts; | |
| legal contingencies; and | |
| accounting for income taxes. |
Each of these critical accounting policies is described in more detail below.
14
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require managements judgment in its application. There are also areas in which managements judgment in selecting among available alternatives would not produce a materially different result. Our management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with our Audit Committee. See the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which contain additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures required by GAAP.
Revenue
We generally recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. If we have doubt about the collectibility of revenue at the time it is earned, such revenue is deferred until cash has been received. Our revenue streams are derived from different sources in our two business divisions, Web Properties and Jeeves Solutions, as described below.
Web Properties
Revenues associated with our Web Properties division are generated from four general sources:
| sales of branded advertising products; | |
| sales of premier listings and other paid placement products; | |
| sales of paid inclusion products; and | |
| syndication of services offered on our Web sites to other companies sites. |
Our branded advertising ranges from traditional advertising units such as banners, towers and interstitials to dynamic animated placements through our branded animation service and highly targeted graphic units through our branded response product. Branded advertising is generally sold on a cost per impression basis with the revenue derived from such arrangements recognized during the period that the service is provided, provided that no significant obligations remain at the end of the period. Such obligations typically include the guarantee of a minimum number of impressions or times that an advertisement appears in pages viewed by users of our online properties. To the extent the minimum guaranteed impressions are not delivered, we defer recognition of the corresponding revenue until the remaining guaranteed impressions levels are achieved.
Our premier listings and other paid placement products are text messages that are designed to simply connect users interested in a particular product or service with an advertiser offering that product or service at the exact moment users need the information, much like a Yellow Pages listing. With these products, advertisers typically pay only for performance, so these revenues are generated when a user clicks on the answer that links to a merchants Web site on a cost per click, or CPC basis. Alternatively, we may recognize revenue on a revenue-sharing basis when the paid placement service is offered through one of our third party providers.
Our paid inclusion products provide an opportunity for Web sites to ensure that they are included in our search index. Paid inclusion products are generally priced on a per URL basis to have the URL included in our database and periodically refreshed over a set period of time, which is typically one year. Revenues are collected in advance and recognized over the appropriate service period.
Our syndication services range from the sale of promotional material on behalf of partners to the syndication of our Web-wide search technology to portals, infomediaries, and content and destination Web sites. Syndication license fees primarily consist of revenue-sharing arrangements, fixed fee arrangements or fee-per-use arrangements, and revenues are recognized as the service is delivered. Revenues from revenue-sharing arrangements are recorded net of amounts paid to syndication partners, except when we act as the primary obligor in the arrangement and bear risk with respect to the inventory of promotional space and credit risk, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 99-19, which expense is recognized as a cost of sale and revenue is recorded on a gross basis.
15
Jeeves Solutions
Revenues from our Jeeves Solutions division are derived from two sources: software license revenues and services revenue. Software license revenues are generated from companies licensing the rights to use our natural language and customer intelligence technologies for use on their corporate Web sites. Services revenue is generated from sales of maintenance agreements, consulting services and training services associated with our licensed software.
We recognize software license revenues in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition or SOP 97-2, as amended by Statement of Position 98-9. SOP 97-2 provides specific industry guidance and stipulates that revenue recognized from software arrangements is to be allocated to each element of the arrangement based on the relative fair value of the elements. Under SOP 97-2, the determination of fair value is based on the objective evidence that is specific to the vendor. We utilize the residual method under which revenue is allocated to the undelivered element, based on vendor specific evidence of fair value and the residual amounts of revenue allocated to the delivered element.
We recognize license revenues at the end of the core implementation period if implementation services are included in the original license arrangement and are considered to be essential to the functionality of the software. Even where we have a signed license agreement for the purchase of our software and have delivered the software, when we do the implementation, license revenue recognition depends on whether we have begun core implementation. For license agreements under which we have no implementation responsibility, or where implementation is not considered to be essential to the functionality of the software, we recognize revenue upon delivery of the software. Examples of situations under which we have no implementation responsibility include additional license sales to existing customers or customers who elect to use internal or third party resources to implement the software. In software license arrangements where a service element is critical to the functionality of the software, license, implementation and service fees are recognized ratably over the life of the arrangement, commencing upon service implementation. License payments from our joint venture are recorded as deferred revenue and are being recognized as revenues on a straight-line basis over a four year period.
We generally provide consulting and training services on a time and materials basis. We provide maintenance and support services under renewable, term maintenance agreements, which we price as a percentage of our license fees. Maintenance and support fee revenue is recognized ratably over the contractual term, which is generally twelve months and commences from the implementation of service or delivery of product. Amounts paid prior to service implementation are recorded as deferred revenue, with recognition commencing upon service implementation.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables and provide allowances for the portion of receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. For those invoices not specifically reviewed, provisions are provided at differing rates, based upon the age of the receivable. In determining these percentages, we analyze our historical collection experience and current economic trends. If the historical data we use to calculate the allowance provided for doubtful accounts does not reflect the future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be needed and our future results of operations could be harmed.
We also record a provision for returns and revenue adjustments in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. These estimates are based on historical analysis of credit memo data and other known factors. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect future uncollectible revenue, then a change in the allowances would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could decrease.
16
Legal Contingencies
We are involved currently in various claims and legal proceedings. Periodically, we review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Because of uncertainties related to these matters, accruals are based only on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to our pending claims and litigation and may revise our estimates. Such revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position. See Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the Companys material legal proceedings.
Income Tax
As of December 31, 2002, we had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $211.0 million and $83.0 million available to reduce future federal and state taxable income, respectively. These net operating loss carryforwards are carried on our balance sheet as a deferred tax asset, but due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing of realizing the benefits of our deferred tax assets from our net operating loss carryforwards in future years, we have recorded a 100% valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Financial Accounting Statement Standard No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes or SFAS 109 requires that a valuation allowance be set up to reduce a deferred tax asset to the extent it is more likely than not that the related tax benefits will not be realized. In order for a company to realize the tax benefits associated with a net operating loss, it must have taxable income within the applicable carryback or carryfoward periods. Sources of taxable income that may allow for the realization of those tax benefits include taxable income in the current year or prior years that is available though a carryback claim; future taxable income that will result from the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, (i.e. the reversal of deferred tax liabilities); and future taxable income generated by future operations.
SFAS 109 indicates that all available evidence, both positive and negative, should be identified and considered in making a determination as to whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Examples of positive evidence include: strong earnings history; existing contracts or backlog; and assets with net built in gains for tax purposes. Examples of negative evidence include but are not limited to the following: a pretax loss for financial reporting purposes for the current year or a recent preceding year; a deficit in stockholders equity; a history of operating loss or tax credit carryforwards expiring unused; and cumulative losses in recent years.
We believe that our losses in recent years and deficit in stockholders equity present negative evidence that required a valuation allowance to be recorded to reduce to zero the deferred tax asset associated with the net operating losses and temporary differences. Accordingly, we have not taken a benefit for that asset. If we generate taxable income in 2003, this would be positive evidence that could allow us to release a portion of the valuation allowance set up against the asset. However, since we still have losses in recent years and because there is no other compelling positive evidence, we believe that it would not be appropriate for us to release any more of the valuation than can be utilized in 2003.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | Change | 2002 | ||||||||||
Web Properties revenue
|
$ | 21,584 | 99.8 | % | $ | 10,804 | |||||||
Percentage of total revenues
|
85.8% | 67.2% | |||||||||||
Jeeves Solutions revenue
|
$ | 3,578 | (32.1 | )% | $ | 5,273 | |||||||
Percentage of total revenues
|
14.2% | 32.8% | |||||||||||
Total revenue
|
$ | 25,162 | 56.5 | % | $ | 16,077 |
17
Our revenues are derived from our two business divisions. Web Properties revenues are related to our Internet search services and to the syndication of Web search services to third party Web sites. Jeeves Solutions revenues are related to the sales of our software and service products to corporations. Total revenues for the first quarter of 2003 grew 56.5% as compared with the first quarter of 2002.
Web Properties Revenue
Total Web Properties revenues for the first quarter of 2003 increased 99.8% over the first quarter of 2002. This growth reflects activity in both the U.S. and U.K. markets. Growth in the U.K. was partially attributable to the inclusion of the entire quarter of U.K. results, as opposed to a partial quarter in 2002, due to its acquisition in February 2002. Our revenues from this division consist of three main categories: (1) sales of paid placement products; (2) branded advertising; and (3) paid inclusion. The following table presents sales for each product line, split between the U.S. and the U.K.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | Change | 2002 | |||||||||||
Paid Placement:
|
||||||||||||||
U.S.
|
$ | 11,209 | 182.9 | % | $ | 3,962 | ||||||||
U.K.
|
4,133 | 320.4 | % | 983 | ||||||||||
Total Paid Placement
|
15,342 | 210.3 | % | 4,945 | ||||||||||
Branded Advertising:
|
||||||||||||||
U.S.
|
3,936 | (15.8 | )% | 4,675 | ||||||||||
U.K.
|
1,845 | 58.0 | % | 1,168 | ||||||||||
Total Branded Advertising
|
5,781 | (1.1 | )% | 5,843 | ||||||||||
Paid Inclusion:
|
||||||||||||||
U.S.
|
457 | 2,756.3 | % | 16 | ||||||||||
U.K.
|
4 | | | |||||||||||
Total Paid Inclusion
|
461 | 2,781.3 | % | 16 | ||||||||||
Total Web Properties
|
$ | 21,584 | 99.8 | % | $ | 10,804 | ||||||||
Total:
|
||||||||||||||
U.S.
|
15,602 | 80.3 | % | 8,653 | ||||||||||
U.K.
|
5,982 | 178.1 | % | 2,151 | ||||||||||
Total Web Properties
|
$ | 21,584 | 99.8 | % | $ | 10,804 | ||||||||
Paid placement revenues in the first quarter of 2003 grew significantly over the first quarter of 2002, driven by strong growth in revenue from our paid placement and paid listings products. Paid placement benefited from improvements in both unit volumes and unit pricing, as well as better revenue sharing terms from our current primary paid links provider, Google, Inc. Paid placement revenues in the U.K. were also impacted by the inclusion of the full quarter results in 2003, as compared with 2002. Additionally, revenues from our premier listings product grew significantly in the first quarter of 2003, as compared with the year ago quarter when this product was first launched.
Branded advertising revenues were approximately flat company wide, with a slight decline in the U.S., which was partially offset by growth in the U.K. Advertising sales in the U.S. decreased due to the discontinuation of banners and interstitials on Ask.com beginning in the fourth quarter of 2002. This decrease was partially offset by the continued growth of our branded response product. The increase in U.K. revenues was due to the inclusion of the U.K. results for the full first quarter of 2003, as compared with only being included for a partial period as a result of our acquisition of the property in the year ago quarter, as well as growth across all U.K. advertising products.
18
Revenues from paid inclusion showed strong percentage growth from the small base of the first quarter of 2002 when it was initially launched. We expect revenues from this product to ramp slowly due to the nature of this products revenue model, which recognizes fees gradually over the service periods that typically run one year.
For the second quarter of 2003, we expect revenues to decrease slightly as compared with the first quarter. We believe that our traffic corresponds with overall Internet usage, which declines slightly in the second quarter heading into the summer months. We anticipate that the decline in overall traffic will be somewhat offset by increases in the percentage of our traffic that produces revenue for us and by increases in the average price we charge for our products and services. We intend to continue to seek increased Web traffic by improving the relevance of our search answers and, thereby, increasing user satisfaction.
Jeeves Solutions Revenue
Total Jeeves Solutions revenue for the first quarter of 2003 decreased 32.1% as compared with the first quarter of 2002. Revenues from this division consist of license and services revenue. The following table presents sales from each category and to corporate customers and our joint venture partners.
For the Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | Change | 2002 | ||||||||||
Licenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Corporate
|
$ | 687 | 150.7 | % | $ | 274 | |||||||
Japan
|
1,131 | | 1,131 | ||||||||||
UK
|
| 100.0 | % | 1,606 | |||||||||
Total licenses
|
1,818 | (39.6 | )% | 3,011 | |||||||||
Services:
|
|||||||||||||
Corporate
|
1,760 | (21.0 | )% | 2,227 | |||||||||
UK
|
| (100.0 | )% | 35 | |||||||||
Total services
|
1,760 | (22.2 | )% | 2,262 | |||||||||
Total Jeeves Solutions
|
$ | 3,578 | (32.1 | )% | $ | 5,273 | |||||||
Total:
|
|||||||||||||
Corporate
|
2,447 | (2.2 | )% | 2,501 | |||||||||
Japan
|
1,131 | | 1,131 | ||||||||||
UK
|
| (100.0 | )% | 1,641 | |||||||||
Total Jeeves Solutions
|
$ | 3,578 | (32.1 | )% | $ | 5,273 | |||||||
License revenues decreased in the first quarter of 2003 as compared with 2002. This was due to the termination of the license arrangement with our U.K. joint venture, which we acquired in early 2002. This was partially offset by increased licensing to corporate customers.
Services revenues were lower in the first quarter of 2003 compared to 2002, almost entirely due to reductions in spending from corporate customers. Services to corporate customers decreased as demand for services was impacted by the decrease in information technology spending.
We expect the market for corporate information technology to continue to be weak with extended sales cycles for the foreseeable future. For the second quarter of 2003, we anticipate revenue to be approximately $3.0 million, decreasing from the first quarter of 2003. However, we plan to continue to develop Jeeves Solutions product offerings to meet the needs of our customers, so that we will be well positioned when corporate spending on technology recovers.
19
Gross Margin
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | Change | 2002 | ||||||||||
Web Properties gross profit
|
$ | 16,546 | 132.9 | % | $ | 7,105 | |||||||
Web Properties gross margin
|
76.7% | 65.8% | |||||||||||
Jeeves Solutions gross profit
|
$ | 2,388 | (26.0 | )% | $ | 3,227 | |||||||
Jeeves Solutions gross margin
|
66.7% | 61.2% | |||||||||||
Total gross profit
|
$ | 18,934 | 83.3 | % | $ | 10,332 | |||||||
Total gross margin
|
75.2% | 64.3% |
Web Properties Gross Margin
Cost of revenues for our Web Properties division consists primarily of costs related to traffic acquisition and the delivery of our search results. Costs to acquire traffic to our Web sites include revenue-based payments and similar arrangements with third parties who direct traffic to our properties. Costs related to delivering our search results include depreciation of Web site equipment, hosting and ad server management, salaries and related personnel costs and amortization charges related to technology acquired in certain of our business combinations.
Gross margin percentage for Web Properties increased in the first quarter of 2003 due to the increase in revenue. On a dollar basis, cost of revenues increased $1.3 million to $5.0 million in the first quarter of 2003 as compared with the first quarter of 2002, reflecting increased traffic acquisition costs associated with the higher levels of traffic, partially offset by decreases in compensation-related costs and facilities charges relating to our restructuring activities. Additionally, cost of revenues in 2002 only includes expenses from the date of our acquisition of the U.K. property in February 2002.
We expect Web Properties gross margin in the second quarter of 2003 to be similar to the first quarter of 2003, consistent with our expectations for similar levels of revenue.
Jeeves Solutions Gross Margin
Cost of revenues for our Jeeves Solutions division consists primarily of salaries and related personnel costs and other direct costs of providing consulting and licensing to our corporate customers. Cost of revenues for Jeeves Solutions also includes amortization charges related to technology acquired in certain of our business combinations.
Gross margin percentage for Jeeves Solutions increased in the first quarter of 2003 due entirely to the decrease in cost of revenues. On a dollar basis, cost of revenues decreased $856,000 to $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2003 as compared with the first quarter 2002. The decrease is reflective of significant decreases in salary and related costs resulting from the decrease in revenue levels and to the reduced personnel needs due to our migration to the JeevesOne software platform, which is less labor intensive than our hosted product.
We expect Jeeves Solutions gross margin in the second quarter of 2003 to be similar to the first quarter of 2003.
20
Companywide Operating Expenses
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | Change | 2002 | ||||||||||
Product development
|
$ | 4,296 | (25.6 | )% | $ | 5,774 | |||||||
Percentage of total revenues
|
17.1% | 35.9% | |||||||||||
Sales and marketing
|
$ | 8,169 | (18.6 | )% | $ | 10,033 | |||||||
Percentage of total revenues
|
32.5% | 62.4% | |||||||||||
General and administrative
|
$ | 4,281 | 3.3 | % | $ | 4,146 | |||||||
Percentage of total revenues
|
17.0% | 25.8% |
Product Development Expenses
Product development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, consultant fees and expenses related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of our technology and services. To date, all software development costs have been expensed as incurred.
Decreased compensation and compensation-related costs, and the use of consultants comprise the majority of the dollar decrease in the first quarter of 2003 compared to the first quarter of 2002. This decrease resulted from our focus on key, strategic areas of product development to support our business plan and reduction in the number of product development initiatives that are not essential to delivering future financial results. Further, we reached several significant product release milestones in the Jeeves Solutions division, including the extension of JeevesOne to additional platforms in 2002, which decreased our need for consultants and other product development expenses.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions and related personnel expenses as well as advertising and promotional expenditures.
The decrease in sales and marketing expenses in the first quarter of 2003 reflects decreased compensation costs, resulting from actions we have taken to control costs and align our infrastructure needs with the business. Further cost control measures in variable spending areas such as advertising and marketing collateral also contributed to the decline. These decreases were partially offset by increases in direct marketing as we implemented more targeted marketing initiatives, and incentive compensation reflecting the increased revenues.
We expect sales and marketing expenses in the second quarter of 2003 to increase, both on a dollar basis and as a percentage of revenue, relative to the first quarter of 2003. During the first quarter of 2003, we began the testing of marketing campaigns to promote both branding and traffic generation, and we expect to expand those campaigns in the second quarter after we have evaluated the results of the tests.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist of costs for general corporate functions including depreciation and other facilities charges, and insurance. Also included is the provision for doubtful accounts, various accounting, investor relations and legal costs associated with operating our business, and administrative function salaries.
Expenses were essentially flat in the first quarter of 2003 as compared with the first quarter of 2002. Slightly higher expenses relating to general corporate costs such as insurance were partially offset by improved quality of accounts receivables, resulting in decreases in bad debt expenses.
21
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | Change | 2002 | |||||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
$ | | (100.0 | )% | $ | 2,231 | ||||||
Restructuring costs
|
$ | 466 | | $ | |
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
During the first quarter of 2002, we recorded impairment charges totaling $2.2 million related to computer equipment and software, furniture and fixtures that we disposed of or were no longer in use. There were no similar charges in the first quarter of 2003.
Restructuring Costs
In the quarter ended March 31, 2003, we implemented certain restructuring actions to better align our cost structure with the current and anticipated levels of business activities. These actions resulted in restructuring charges of approximately $466,000 relating to workforce reductions totaling 31 positions. As of March 31, 2003, all of the affected employees had been notified and the terminations were completed or will be completed within 60 days of the notification date. There were no similar charges in the first quarter of 2002.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | Change | 2002 | |||||||||
Gain on acquisition of joint venture
|
$ | 6,124 | 528.7 | % | $ | 974 | ||||||
Interest and other income (expense), net
|
$ | 180 | (59.0 | )% | $ | 439 |
Gain on Acquisition of Joint Venture
During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, we recognized a gain of $6.1 million. This amount represents the fair value of net assets we recorded in excess of the consideration paid upon the acquisition of the remaining outstanding equity interests in our joint venture, Ask Jeeves UK, which had been deferred due to a contingent payment obligation in our agreement with our former partners. The gain was recognized as other income when the contingent payment obligation to the former partners expired in March 2003.
During the first quarter of 2002, we recognized a gain of $974,000 representing the remaining balance of deferred license fees paid to us by Ask Jeeves UK, for a licensing arrangement that was terminated when we acquired the entity. The gain was recognized as other income.
Interest and Other Income (Expense)
Interest income was $276,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and $514,000 for the comparable year ago quarter. Interest income relates primarily to interest earned on fixed income securities and correlates with the average balance of those investments and prevailing interest rates. The decrease in interest income in the first quarter of 2003 compared with the first quarter 2002 relates to decreases in both average balances and prevailing interest rates during the year. Interest expense was $82,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $183,000 for the first quarter of 2002. The decrease in interest expense is attributable to the decreased interest rate incurred on borrowings under our line of credit. In addition to interest income and expense, during the three months ended March 31, 2002, we recorded a gain of $125,000 from sales of investment securities.
22
Income Tax Provision
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | Change | 2002 | |||||||||
Income tax provision
|
$ | 335 | | $ | |
We recorded a tax provision in the first quarter of 2003 relating to statutory income in the U.K. There were no similar charges in the year ago period, as we had no taxable income.
Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations In Operating Results
Our operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Factors that may adversely affect our results of operations include:
| our ability to obtain new advertising contracts, maintain existing ones, and effectively manage our advertising inventory; | |
| the number of questions asked and answered on our Web sites and on the Web sites of our corporate customers; | |
| our ability to attract and retain advertisers and our ability to link our advertisers to potential customers; | |
| rate changes for advertising on our Web sites; | |
| marketing expenses and technology infrastructure costs as well as other costs that we may incur as we expand our operations; | |
| seasonal and other fluctuations in demand for our services and for advertising space on our Web sites; | |
| our ability to develop and introduce new technology; | |
| our ability to obtain new corporate customers, the length of the development cycle for corporate customers and the timing of revenue recognition with respect to contracts with corporate customers; | |
| announcements and new technology introductions by our competitors; | |
| our ability to attract and retain key personnel; and | |
| costs relating to possible acquisitions and integration of technologies or businesses. |
Because of the foregoing factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results should not be relied upon as an indicator of our future performance.
As the Internet advertising market continues to develop, seasonal and cyclical patterns may emerge, or become more pronounced, thereby causing period-to-period variability within each years revenues. For example, we have historically experienced a stronger period of growth in fourth quarter of the year. Similar to the advertising revenue cycle experienced by traditional media companies, this apparent trend may result in our advertising sales being lower during the summer vacation period. Seasonality in the retail industry and in Internet service usage is likely to cause quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations, which could harm our business.
23
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||
Unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities
|
$ | 39,137 | $ | 33,375 | |||||
Restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities
|
$ | 11,065 | $ | 11,065 | |||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities
|
$ | 50,202 | $ | 44,440 | |||||
Percentage of total assets
|
65.9% | 61.6% | |||||||
Current ratio*
|
2.29 | 2.22 | |||||||
Days sales outstanding
|
34 | 47 |
* | Calculated excluding deferred revenue and deferred gain |
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$ | 5,377 | $ | (30,037 | ) | |||
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(2,493 | ) | 24,062 | |||||
Cash provided by financing activities
|
1,547 | 528 | ||||||
Change in cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities, due to change in marketable securities
|
1,527 | (19,261 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
(196 | ) | 14 | |||||
Total change in cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities
|
$ | 5,762 | $ | (24,694 | ) | |||
Our principal source of liquidity is our cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities. Since our inception, we have financed our operations primarily through the private placement of equity securities, our initial public offering in June 1999 and our follow-on offering in March 2000. Marketable securities consist of highly liquid instruments (primarily U.S., state and municipal government securities and corporate debt securities) with short maturities. We consider all cash and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of less than three months at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Unrestricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at March 31, 2003 increased $5.8 million as compared with December 31, 2002. The increase resulted primarily from cash provided by operations of $5.4 million. As of March 31, 2003, we had total cash and cash equivalents of $50.2 million, of which $11.3 million was held in the UK.
Net cash provided by operating activities of $5.4 million resulted primarily from net income of $7.7 million adjusted for non-cash items and changes in working capital and other items. Significant non-cash items included the recognition of a gain on the acquisition of the Ask Jeeves UK joint venture and depreciation and amortization of $2.0 million. Changes in working capital provided $755,000.
Net cash used in investing activities was $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Cash used in investing activities resulted primarily from the net purchase of marketable securities of $1.5 million and capital expenditures of $847,000.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Cash from financing relates primarily to cash proceeds from exercises of stock options of $1.8 million.
We have a revolving line of credit with a bank in the amount of $15.0 million. The line of credit expires on July 1, 2003, unless extended. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.5%, which was 2.6% at March 31, 2003. All borrowings are collateralized by an equal amount of our marketable securities. The line of credit agreement contains various covenants. As of March 31, 2003, borrowings of $11.0 million were outstanding under the line of credit. Additionally, standby letters of credit of approximately $65,000 were issued and outstanding under the line of credit, which are being maintained
24
Our capital requirements depend on numerous factors, including market acceptance of our services and the amount of resources we invest in Web site and content development, marketing and selling our products and services, our brand promotions and any future acquisitions or divestitures.
We anticipate that our existing unrestricted cash and marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our anticipated needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months. On an ongoing basis, we will need to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our anticipated needs for working capital and capital expenditures, or we will need to raise additional capital. However, if we are not successful in generating sufficient cash flow from operations or in raising additional capital when required in sufficient amounts and on terms acceptable to us, these failures could seriously harm our business. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2003, our only unconsolidated subsidiary is Ask Jeeves Japan, which generally provides Ask Jeeves services within a defined geographic region. We do not have majority voting rights or majority residual interests in the assets or income or obligations to absorb the majority of the losses of any off balance sheet entities, including Ask Jeeves Japan. Further, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any commitment or intent to provide additional funding to any such entities. Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any market, credit, liquidity or financing risk that could arise from engaging in such relationships.
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at March 31, 2003, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods:
Less than | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||
Borrowings under line of credit
|
$ | 11,000 | $ | 11,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||
Capital lease obligations
|
339 | 339 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Non-cancelable operating leases
|
11,850 | 4,284 | 4,562 | 1,502 | 1,502 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 23,189 | $ | 15,623 | $ | 4,562 | $ | 1,502 | $ | 1,502 |
25
RISK FACTORS
Included below are other risk factors that may affect our future operating results.
Risks Related to our Company
We have a history of net losses and might not remain profitable.
We have incurred net losses every year since our inception. Although we were profitable in the fourth quarter of 2002 as well as the first quarter of 2003, as of March 31, 2003 we had an accumulated deficit of $689.0 million. We cannot assure you that we will remain profitable or cash flow positive. Moreover, we might not be able to increase our operating profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. To increase profits, we will need to generate revenue growth from our advertising and corporate customers while continuing to control our expenses. Beginning in late 2000, we announced steps to control costs, including business realignment and a reduction in our workforce. These measures reduced our operating costs during 2002 but might yet result in long-term problems, such as delayed product development or reduced morale, which could be expensive and difficult to remedy. Moreover, we might be unable to reduce operating costs any further and we face the risk that our costs might increase again in the future. Indeed, we believe it is critical that we continue to expend financial and management resources to develop our brand loyalty through marketing and promotion, to enhance our search technologies and to expand our other services. If we fail to increase revenues or control costs, our annual net losses would likely resume, in which case we would eventually need to obtain additional financing or cease operations.
We derive a significant amount of revenue from our paid placement arrangement with Google Inc.
We derive a significant amount of our revenues under an agreement with Google Inc., to participate in their sponsored links program through which we share revenues generated from Googles advertisers on our search Web sites. The contract is scheduled to terminate in September 2005, however if the contract were to end unexpectedly, we would need to find another suitable partner or otherwise replace the lost revenues. Further, if Googles performance under this contract were to unexpectedly deteriorate or our ability to generate traffic for these listings were to decrease, our results of operations could be harmed.
Web-based business models are still evolving.
Our advertising revenue will depend on our ability to achieve, measure and demonstrate to advertisers the breadth of Web traffic using our search service and the value of our targeted advertising. Currently, there are a variety of pricing models for selling advertising on the Internet, including models based on the number of impressions delivered, the number of click-throughs by users, the duration over which the advertisement is displayed or the number of keywords to which the advertisement is linked. It is still difficult to predict which pricing model, if any, will emerge as the industry standard. This uncertainty makes it difficult to project our future advertising rates and revenues. A decrease in advertising sold or further cuts in advertising rates would reduce our total revenue.
If our Jeeves Solutions division fails to obtain new sources of licensing revenue, its 2003 financial results will be weaker than 2002.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2003, our Jeeves Solutions division generated $3.6 million, or approximately 14.2% of our total revenues, from licensing software and services. Included in that amount are intellectual property licensing revenues of approximately $1.1 million that Jeeves Solutions received from Ask Jeeves Japan. If our Jeeves Solutions division cannot obtain new sources of licensing revenue from third parties in 2003, its financial results will suffer.
26
We rely on third-party advertising delivery that could affect our ability to deliver advertisements on our Web sites.
We rely on third-party advertising services, provided by DoubleClick, Inc. to deliver advertisements to our users. DoubleClick is currently the only provider available in the market that meets our delivery needs. If DoubleClick fails to deliver advertisements as contracted for due to reliability or performance problems, or if advertisements cannot be targeted as promised to advertisers, our revenues may decrease.
If we cannot maintain the popularity of our search engine among Internet users, our business plan will fail.
We will be successful only if a critical mass of Internet users adopt our search technologies and services as a primary method of navigating the Internet. Internet users have a variety of other search techniques, including other search engines and subject-matter directories, available to them to find information on the Web. Users can also use non-Web-based methods of obtaining information through the Internet, including call centers, chat rooms and e-mail, rather than browsing through difficult-to-navigate corporate Web sites. Our search technologies, including those of our recent acquisition of Teoma Technologies, Inc., are novel and unproven. It is difficult to predict the rate at which users will sample our services and the extent to which they will adopt them as their search technology. Even in the case of repeat users, it is difficult to know whether they return to our Web sites because they are satisfied with our offerings or because they are dissatisfied with the alternatives. At any time, users of our services might revert to prior search techniques or choose new search techniques altogether. We cannot assure you that widespread acceptance of our search technologies and services will occur. If we cannot maintain the popularity of our search engine among Internet users, our business plan will fail.
If high quality, third-party data ceases to be available, or directly accessible, on the Web, our business plan might fail.
Our Internet search services are designed to directly link users to a page within a third-party Web site that contains an answer to the users question. We have little control over the content of these third-party Web sites. If these third-party Web sites do not contain high-quality, up-to-date information, the utility of our service to the user will be reduced. In addition, when our search engine attempts to direct the user to a page within a third-party companys Web site, the company administering the site sometimes automatically redirects users to that companys own home page. If third-party companies prevent us from directly linking our users to pages within their Web sites, and if there are no comparable alternative Web sites to which we can direct our users, the utility and attractiveness of our services to users will be reduced. If the utility of our services diminishes for either of the above reasons, traffic on our Web sites will likely fall, which would reduce our ability to charge for advertising and premium listings.
If we fail to compete effectively against our current and potential competitors, we will lose market share.
We compete in markets that are new, intensely competitive, fragmented and rapidly changing. Many of our competitors are bringing new search technologies to market, establishing alliances with key portals and focusing on specific segments of the search market. In particular:
| Web Properties: Our Web Properties division faces direct competition from companies that provide Internet search and directory services. For example, Web Properties competes with search providers, including AltaVista Company, FAST (AlltheWeb.com), Google, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. (Inktomi), for the traffic generated by Internet users seeking links to third-party content to address their online information retrieval needs. Web Properties also competes with directory services, including Overture Services, Inc., LookSmart, Ltd. and Yahoo! Inc., because they provide alternative ways for users to obtain the desired information. Additionally, Web Properties competes with portals and similar sites including AOL, MSN, Yahoo! Inc., and Google, Inc. because they attract Web traffic. |
27
| Jeeves Solutions: Our Jeeves Solutions division competes with a number of companies that provide customer self-service solutions for corporate customers. For example, Jeeves Solutions competes with companies providing advanced natural language solutions, including iPhrase Technologies, Inc. and Kanisa Inc.; search technology companies, including Google, Inc. and Verity, Inc.; and catalog search companies, including EasyAsk, Inc. and Mercado Software, Inc. |
Our growth will depend on our ability to attract and retain new users through effective promotional campaigns.
We believe that favorable consumer and business community perceptions of the Ask Jeeves brands are essential to our future success. Accordingly, we intend to continue pursuing brand-enhancement strategies, which may include mass market and multimedia advertising, promotional programs and public relations activities. As with any public awareness campaign, we face the risk that our expenditures might not lead to the desired result; that is we might experience no net increase in our brand recognition or brand loyalty, our number of new users, our Web site traffic or our number of corporate customers. Furthermore, even if such increases occur, they might not be sufficiently large to justify the expenditures. If we are unable to promote brand awareness and loyalty in a cost-effective manner, we are unlikely to attract new users and our existing user base might shrink through attrition.
If we are unable to rapidly and successfully develop new products and new product enhancements, as well as to integrate acquired technologies, we might be unable to meet customer demand.
In the highly competitive, rapidly changing Internet search environment, our future success depends in large part on our ability to develop and introduce new products that meet the needs of our customers more rapidly than our competitors. In our Web Properties division, for example, we are currently developing new enhancements to many of our advertising products, including Branded Response, Premier Listings, Site Submit and Index Express to meet new demands in the marketplace. If we are unable to develop these and other new and enhanced products on a timely basis, we might lose market share to our faster competitors and never recoup our development costs. Product development is complicated by the following factors, among others:
| It is difficult, expensive and time consuming to design alternate versions of a product to run on each of the operating system platforms that our customers might have in place. | |
| Additionally, we have acquired technology to accelerate our ability to meet new product requirements and enhancements. For example, in September 2001 we acquired Teoma Technologies, Inc. and in January 2002 we announced the acquisition of certain technology from Octopus Software, Inc. We must continue to scale and integrate these technologies into our existing and new products. If we are unable to successfully and rapidly integrate these and other technologies into our products, our business may be harmed. |
Our business may suffer in a variety of ways unless overall economic conditions improve.
Current economic conditions pose a variety of additional challenges to our business. The financial condition of some of our customers has deteriorated and continues to deteriorate because of their inability to raise additional funds for their businesses. Many of our customers are making and will continue to make significant cutbacks in their sales and marketing efforts and capital expenditures, which will in turn harm our financial results. Our inability to rapidly replace this portion of our customer base will negatively impact our business.
Our past acquisitions and any future acquisitions may disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value, divert management attention or be difficult to integrate.
We have acquired a number of companies since our initial public offering, including Teoma Technologies, Inc. in September 2001 and Ask Jeeves UK in February 2002. We may in the future seek to acquire or invest in additional businesses, products or technologies that we believe could complement or
28
| difficulties in assimilation of acquired personnel, operations, technologies or products; | |
| unanticipated costs associated with acquisitions; | |
| diversion of managements attention from other business concerns and potential disruption of our ongoing business; | |
| adverse effects on our existing business relationships with our customers; | |
| potential patent or trademark infringement from acquired technologies; | |
| adverse effects on our current employees and the inability to retain employees of acquired companies; | |
| use of substantial portions of our available cash as all or a portion of the purchase price; and | |
| dilution of our current stockholders due to issuances of additional securities as consideration for acquisitions. |
If we are unable to successfully integrate our acquired companies or to create new or enhanced services, we may not achieve the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. If we fail to achieve the anticipated benefits from the acquisitions, we may incur increased expenses and experience a shortfall in our anticipated revenues and we may not obtain a satisfactory return on our investment. In addition, if a significant number of employees of acquired companies fail to remain employed with us, we may experience difficulties in achieving the expected benefits of the acquisitions.
If we fail to maintain effective internal financial and managerial systems, controls and procedures, our results of operations may be harmed.
Our recent business realignment and reductions in workforce placed a significant strain on our managerial staff, financial controls and operational resources as our employees have assumed greater responsibilities and learned to manage their increased workload with reduced resources. We continue to evaluate our operational and financial systems and our managerial controls and procedures to determine what additional changes, if any, might help us to better manage our current operations. We face the risk that our systems, procedures and controls might not be adequate to support our operations or to maintain accountability for our assets. Any such failure could harm our results of operations.
Our international expansion efforts might lose money.
Any expansion by us into international markets will require substantial management attention and financial resources. Establishing operations in other countries is a significant investment that might not produce the desired levels of revenue. In addition, our foreign operations are subject to other inherent risks and problems, including:
| the impact of business cycles and downturns in economies outside the United States; | |
| longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in accounts receivable collections; | |
| unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; | |
| difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; | |
| reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; | |
| unanticipated tax costs associated with the cross-border use of intangible assets; | |
| political and economic instability; |
29
| fluctuations in currency exchange rates; | |
| difficulty in maintaining effective communications with employees and customers due to distance, language and cultural barriers; | |
| lower brand recognition for Ask Jeeves and the Jeeves character in non-English speaking countries; | |
| lower per capita Internet usage in many foreign countries, for a variety of reasons including lower disposable incomes, lack of adequate telecommunications and computer infrastructure and concerns regarding online security for e-commerce transactions; and | |
| competition in international markets from a broad range of competitors, including AltaVista Company, Google, Inc., Overture Services, Inc., LookSmart, Ltd., Yahoo! Inc. and other United States and foreign portals, search engines and service providers. |
Some or all of the above factors could seriously harm the results of our operations.
Legal actions may be initiated against us seeking to hold us liable for our links to third-party Web sites.
Our Internet search services are designed to directly link users to a page within a third-party Web site that contains an answer to the users question. These direct links might expose us to legal actions seeking to hold us liable for the content of those third-party Web sites. These actions might claim, for example, that we should be liable for copyright or trademark infringement or other unauthorized actions by the third-party Web site. Other claims may be based on errors or false or misleading information provided through our Web sites, including information deemed to constitute professional advice including legal, medical, financial or investment advice. Other claims may be based on our links to sexually explicit Web sites and our provision of sexually explicit advertisements when this content is displayed. While no such claims are pending and we do not believe that any such claim would have legal merit, defending against such a legal action could be expensive and distract management. Implementing measures to reduce our exposure to such claims may require us to spend substantial resources and limit the attractiveness of our service to users.
Risks Related to Operating in our Industry
The operating performance of our computer systems and Web servers is critical to our business and reputation.
Any system failure, including network, software or hardware failure due to a computer virus or otherwise, that causes an interruption in our service or a decrease in our responsiveness could result in reduced user traffic on our Web sites and reduced revenues for our business. We have network and server equipment located at Metromedia Fiber Network in California and England, Worldcom in Massachusetts, and Cable & Wireless Communications in England. Although we believe that our current back-up methods are adequate, we face the risk that our back-up servers might fail or might cause an interruption in our service.
We have experienced slower response times and interruptions in service due to malfunction at our hosting facilities and on the Internet backbone networks, major software upgrades on our Web sites and undetected software defects. Our Web sites have had partial interruptions for periods ranging from a few minutes to three hours. In addition, our Web sites also could be affected by computer viruses, electronic break-ins or other similar disruptions. If we experience outages, frequent or persistent system failures or degraded response times, user satisfaction would decrease, we would likely lose advertising revenues and our reputation and brands could be permanently harmed.
Our users and customers depend on Internet service providers, online service providers and other Web site operators for access to our Web sites. Each of these types of providers has experienced significant outages in the past and could experience outages, delays and other operating difficulties due to system failures unrelated to our systems.
30
The occurrence of an earthquake or other natural disaster or unanticipated problem at our principal facilities or at the servers that host or backup our systems could cause interruptions or delays in our interactive network or a loss of data. Our systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure, break-ins, earthquake and similar events. We have not developed a comprehensive disaster recovery plan to respond to system failures. Our general liability insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for losses that may occur due to interruptions in our service.
Our long-term success depends upon the growth and acceptance of Internet advertising as an effective alternative to traditional advertising media.
We compete with traditional media including television, radio and print, in addition to other high-traffic Web sites, for a share of advertisers total advertising expenditures. We face the risk that advertisers might find Internet advertising to be a less effective than traditional media at promoting their products or services and may further reduce or eliminate their expenditures on Internet advertising. Many potential advertisers and advertising agencies have only limited experience advertising on the Internet and have not devoted a significant portion of their advertising expenditures to Internet advertising. Acceptance of the Internet among advertisers will depend, to a large extent, on the perceived effectiveness of Internet advertising and the continued growth of commercial usage of the Internet. Filter software programs that limit or prevent advertising from being displayed on a users computer are available. It is unclear whether this type of software will become widely accepted, but if it does, it would negatively affect Internet-based advertising. Our business could be seriously harmed if the market for Internet advertising does not continue to grow.
A breach of our computer security could damage our reputation and deter customers from using our services.
We attempt to protect our computer systems and network from physical break-ins, security breaches and other disruptive problems caused by the Internet or other users. Computer break-ins could jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network, which could reduce our ability to retain or attract customers, damage our reputation or subject us to litigation. We could be subject to denial of service, vandalism and other attacks on our systems by Internet hackers. Although we intend to continue to implement security technology and establish operational procedures to prevent break-ins, damage and failures, these security measures might fail. Our insurance coverage in certain circumstances might be insufficient to cover issues that might result from such events.
If we do not adapt our search services for users of cell phones, PDAs and similar devices, we might lose market share as users increasingly use handheld devices to access the Internet.
In the coming years, the number of individuals who access the Internet through devices other than a personal computer is expected to increase. These alternative devices include personal digital assistants, known as PDAs, cellular telephones and television set-top devices. The low resolution, functionality and memory currently associated with some of these alternative devices may prevent or impede their users from accessing our graphics-rich Web services. Unless we successfully launch a version of our Web search service that is easily accessible through these alternative devices, we face a risk of losing market share if personal computer users migrate toward use of these alternative devices to access the Internet.
Our ability to remain profitable might depend on continued growth of Internet use.
Our revenue model depends in large part on the volume of Internet user traffic to our Web sites. Our business will be harmed if Internet usage does not continue to grow or grows at significantly lower rates compared to current trends. The continued growth of the Internet is subject to various risks, many of which are outside our control. These risks include the following:
| the Internet infrastructure might not be able to support the demands placed on it; |
31
| performance and reliability of the Internet might decline as usage grows and disruptions caused by malicious users or hackers increases; | |
| locating useful information online might become more difficult as the number of Web sites proliferates, causing Internet usage rates to decrease or to grow at a decreasing rate; | |
| users might hesitate to engage in online commerce because they feel insecure transmitting confidential information, such as credit card numbers, over the Internet; and | |
| users privacy concerns might lead them to reduce Internet use so as to prevent Web sites from gathering user information without the users knowledge or consent. |
Our reliance on Internet companies leaves us vulnerable to credit risks.
We expect to continue to derive a significant portion of our revenues from sales to Internet companies. Many of these companies have limited operating histories and are operating at a loss. Moreover, many of these companies have limited cash reserves and limited access to additional capital. We have in some cases experienced difficulties collecting outstanding accounts receivable from Internet companies. Our collection difficulties might increase as economic recovery is delayed, particularly in light of the general unavailability of new public or private funding for companies in the Internet sector.
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain skilled technical employees.
Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees. Competition for employees with skills in search technology has in the past been intense. We have experienced, and we expect to continue to experience in the future, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate qualifications. If we fail to attract, retain and motivate our employees, our business will be harmed.
In addition, hiring highly qualified customer service and account management personnel is very competitive in our industry due to the limited number of people available with the necessary technical skills and understanding of the Internet. If we are unable to hire and retain qualified sales personnel our business may suffer.
We may face potential liability, loss of users and damage to our reputation for violation of privacy policies.
We have a policy against using personally identifiable information obtained from users of our natural language question answering technologies without the users permission. In the past, the Federal Trade Commission has investigated companies that have used personally identifiable information without permission or in violation of a stated privacy policy. Under the UK Data Protection Act and the EU Data Protection Directive, a failure to ensure that personal information is accurate and secure or a transfer of personal information to a country without adequate privacy protections could result in criminal or civil penalties. If we use personally identifiable information without permission or in violation of our policy, we may face potential liability for invasion of privacy for compiling and providing information to our corporate customers and electronic commerce merchants.
Government regulation and legal uncertainties could harm our business.
Any new law or regulation pertaining to the Internet, or the application or interpretation of existing laws, could decrease the demand for our services, increase our cost of doing business or otherwise seriously harm our business. There is, and will likely continue to be, an increasing number of laws and regulations pertaining to the Internet. These laws or regulations may relate to liability for information retrieved from or transmitted over the Internet, online content regulation, user privacy, taxation and the quality of products and services. Furthermore, the growth and development of electronic commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on electronic commerce companies as well as companies like us that provide electronic commerce services.
32
We file tax returns in such states as required by law based on principles applicable to traditional businesses. However, one or more states could seek to impose additional income tax obligations or sales tax collection obligations on out-of-state companies, such as ours, which engage in or facilitate electronic commerce. A number of proposals have been made at state and local levels that could impose such taxes on the sale of products and services through the Internet or the income derived from such sales. Such proposals, if adopted, could substantially impair the growth of electronic commerce and seriously harm our profitability.
Legislation limiting the ability of the states to impose taxes on Internet-based transactions was enacted recently by the United States Congress. However, this legislation, known as the Internet Tax Freedom Act, imposed only a three-year moratorium on state and local taxes on electronic commerce, where such taxes are discriminatory, unless such taxes were generally imposed and actually enforced prior to October 1, 1998. The legislation, which commenced October 1, 1998 and was to have expired on October 21, 2001, has since been given a five-year extension by the House of Representatives. It is unclear which steps the legislature will take next, and failure to continue to renew this legislation would allow various states to impose taxes on Internet-based commerce. The imposition of such taxes could impair the growth of the electronic commerce marketplace and impair our ability to remain profitable.
In addition, we are not certain how our business may be affected by the application of existing laws governing issues including property ownership, copyrights, encryption and other intellectual property issues, taxation, libel, obscenity and export or import matters. The vast majority of such laws were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Changes in laws intended to address such issues could create uncertainty in the Internet market. Such uncertainty could reduce demand for our services or increase the cost of doing business as a result of litigation costs or increased service delivery costs.
Third parties may bring intellectual property infringement claims against us that would be expensive to defend and, if successful, could subject us to significant liability and block us from using key technology.
From time to time in the ordinary course of business we have been subject to claims of alleged infringement of the trademarks and other intellectual property rights of third parties. Any such claims, if made, and any resulting litigation, should it occur, could subject us to significant liability for damages. In addition, even if we prevail, litigation could be time-consuming and expensive to defend, and could result in the diversion of our time and attention. Any claims from third parties may also result in limitations on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims unless we are able to enter into license agreements that might not be available on reasonable terms, or at all.
Terrorist activities and resulting military and other actions could harm our business.
Terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C. in September of 2001 disrupted commerce throughout the world. The continued threat of terrorism and the potential for military action and heightened security measures in response to this threat may cause significant disruption to commerce throughout the world. To the extent that disruptions result in a general decrease in corporate spending on information technology or advertising, our business and results of operations could be harmed. We are unable to predict whether the threat of terrorism or the responses thereto will result in any long-term commercial disruptions or if such activities or responses will have a long-term adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, if any attacks were to affect the operation of the Internet or key data centers, our business could be harmed. These and other developments arising out of the attacks may make the occurrence of one or more of the factors discussed under Risk Factors likely to occur.
33
Risks Related to Accounting Matters
If requirements relating to accounting treatment for employee stock options are changed, we may be forced to change our business practices.
We currently account for the issuance of stock options under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. If proposals currently under consideration by administrative and governmental authorities are adopted, we may be required to treat the value of the stock options granted to employees as compensation expense. Such a change could have a negative effect on our earnings. In response to a requirement to expense the value of stock options, we could decide to decrease the number of employee stock options granted to our employees. Such a reduction could affect our ability to retain existing employees and attract qualified candidates, and increase the cash compensation we would have to pay to them.
If accounting interpretations relating to revenue recognition change, our reported revenues could decline or we could be forced to make changes in our business practices.
Over the last several years, the accounting profession has issued several standards and interpretations relating to revenue recognition. For example, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued Statement of Position or SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and SOP 98-9 Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions. These standards address software revenue recognition matters primarily from a conceptual level and do not include specific implementation guidance. In addition, in December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, or SAB 101, which explains how the SEC staff believes existing revenue recognition rules should be applied. We believe that our revenue recognition policies are currently in compliance with SOP 97-2, SOP 98-9 and SAB 101.
The accounting profession continues to discuss certain provisions of SOP 97-2 and SAB 101 as well as other revenue recognition standards with the objective of providing guidance on potential interpretations. These discussions and the issuance of interpretations, once finalized, could lead to unanticipated changes in our current revenue accounting practices, which could cause us to recognize lower revenues. These changes may extend sales cycles, increase administrative costs and otherwise harm our business.
Risks Related to the Capital Markets
We may not be able to secure additional financing to meet our future capital needs.
We currently anticipate that we will remain cash flow positive on a sustained basis. However, if we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to cover our expenses and capital expenditures, we will need to raise additional funds. We may require additional funding, for example, to fund brand promotion, develop new or enhanced products and services, respond to competitive pressures or make acquisitions. We may be unable to obtain any required additional financing on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to fund our expansion, successfully promote our brand, develop or enhance products and services, respond to competitive pressures or take advantage of acquisition opportunities, any of which could seriously harm our business. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, our stockholders may experience dilution of their ownership interest, and the newly issued securities may have rights superior to those of the common stock. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, its terms may impose limitations on our operations, including limitations on the payment of dividends. If we do not sustain profitability in the future and are unable to obtain additional financing, then we will eventually be unable to continue our operations.
34
Our stock price may fluctuate significantly regardless of our actual operating performance.
Our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq National Market. The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be highly volatile. Our stock price may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors, including:
| actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results and announcements of technological innovations; | |
| new products or services offered by us or our competitors; | |
| changes in financial estimates by securities analysts; | |
| changes in research coverage by securities analysts; | |
| conditions or trends in the Internet services industry and the online customer service segment in particular; | |
| any announcement by us of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; | |
| additions or departures of key personnel; | |
| sales by current holders of our common stock and general financial conditions and investor sentiment regarding Internet companies generally; and | |
| other events that may be beyond our control. |
In addition, the Nasdaq National Market, where most publicly held Internet companies are traded, has periodically experienced price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations may be unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market and industry factors may harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of an individual companys securities, securities class action litigation often has been instituted against that company. For example, on October 25, 2001, a putative class action lawsuit captioned Leonard Turroff, et al. vs. Ask Jeeves, Inc., et al. was filed against us and two of our officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violation of Federal securities laws. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of managements attention and resources. See further discussion of this lawsuit and other litigation in Item 3, Legal Proceedings.
If we fail to meet the expectations of public market analysts and investors, the market price of our common stock may decrease significantly.
Public market analysts and investors have not been able to develop consistent financial models for the Internet market because of the unpredictable rate of growth of Internet use, the rapidly changing models of doing business on the Internet and the Internets relatively low barriers to entry. As a result, and because of the other risks noted in this discussion, it may be that our actual results will not meet the expectations of public market analysts and investors in future periods. If this occurs, the price of our common stock will likely decrease.
Future sales of our stock could affect our stocks market price.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options and in connection with acquisitions, the market price of our common stock could fall. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
35
Provisions in Delaware law and our charter, stock option agreements and offer letters to executive officers may prevent or delay a change of control.
We are subject to the Delaware anti-takeover laws regulating corporate takeovers. These anti-takeover laws prevent Delaware corporations from engaging in a merger or sale of more than 10% of its assets with any stockholder, including all affiliates and associates of the stockholder, who owns 15% or more of the corporations outstanding voting stock, for three years following the date that the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the corporations assets unless:
| the board of directors approved the transaction in which the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the corporations assets; | |
| after the transaction in which the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the corporations assets, the stockholder owned at least 85% of the corporations outstanding voting stock, excluding shares owned by directors, officers and employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held under the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or | |
| on or after this date, the merger or sale is approved by the board of directors and the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the stockholder. |
A Delaware corporation may opt out of the Delaware anti-takeover laws if its certificate of incorporation or bylaws so provide. We have not opted out of the provisions of the anti-takeover laws. As such, these laws could prohibit or delay mergers or other takeover or change of control of Ask Jeeves and may discourage attempts by other companies to acquire us.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include a number of provisions that may deter or impede hostile takeovers or changes of control or management. These provisions include:
| our board is classified into three classes of directors as nearly equal in size as possible with staggered three year-terms; | |
| the authority of our board to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences and privileges of these shares, without stockholder approval; | |
| all stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called meeting of stockholders and not by written consent; | |
| except under limited circumstances, special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board, the chief executive officer, the board of directors or by holders of shares entitled to cast not less than 50% of the votes of the meeting; and | |
| except under limited circumstances, no cumulative voting. |
These provisions may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control.
Furthermore, in April 2001, we adopted a stockholder rights plan and declared a dividend distribution of one right for each outstanding share of common stock to stockholders of record as of May 7, 2001. Each right entitles the holder to purchase one unit consisting of one one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock for $20 per unit. Under certain circumstances, if a person or group acquires 15% or more of our outstanding common stock, holders of the rights (other than the person or group triggering their exercise) will be able to purchase, in exchange for the $20 exercise price, shares of our common stock or of any company into which we are merged having a value of $40. The rights expire on May 7, 2011 unless extended by our board of directors. Because the rights may substantially dilute the stock ownership of a person or group attempting to take us over without the approval of our board of directors, our rights plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or a significant percentage of our outstanding capital stock without first negotiating with our board of directors regarding such acquisition.
36
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that we will indemnify officers and directors against losses that they may incur in investigations and legal proceedings resulting from their services to us, which may include services in connection with takeover defense measures. These provisions may have the effect of preventing changes in our management.
In addition, our option agreements under the 1996 Stock Option plan provide that if a change of control of Ask Jeeves occurs prior to the first anniversary of the vesting commencement date of an option, then the vesting which would have occurred by such anniversary shall occur. After the first anniversary of the date of grant, these option agreements provide that the vesting of each option shall accelerate by six months upon a change of control. Furthermore, offer letters with our executive officers provide for the payment of severance and acceleration of options upon the termination of these executive officers following a change of control of Ask Jeeves. These provisions in our stock option agreements and offer letters could have the effect of discouraging potential takeover attempts.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to interest rate, market and credit risk and related change in the market values of our investment portfolio. We place our investment portfolio primarily in high credit, quality, corporate, asset-backed, agency and municipal debt instruments. Investments in both fixed and floating rate securities have some degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted by increases in interest rates. Floating rate securities may produce less income than anticipated if interest rates fall. As a result, changes in interest rates may cause us to incur losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that have declined in market value or may result in lower than anticipated investment income. Our investment portfolio is categorized as available-for-sale and accordingly is presented at fair value on the balance sheet.
We manage our exposure to interest rate, market and credit risk in the investment portfolio with investment policies and procedures that limit such things as term, credit rating and the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer and type of instrument. We have not used derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, the effects of changes in interest rates on the fair market value of our marketable investment securities and our earnings were insignificant. Further, we believe that the impact on the fair market value of our securities and our earnings from a hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not be significant.
The majority of our revenue, expense and capital purchasing activities are transacted in U.S. dollars. However, since a portion of the operations consist of operations outside of the U.S., we enter into transactions in other currencies, primarily the British pound. We currently do not hedge our exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Our international business is subject to risks typical of an international business, including but not limited to differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, other regulations and restrictions and foreign exchange rate volatility, particularly the exchange rate between British pound and the U.S. dollar. Accordingly, the impact of changes in these or other factors could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of March 31, 2003, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2003. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls subsequent to March 31, 2003.
37
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
On October 25, 2001, a putative class action lawsuit captioned Leonard Turroff, et al. vs Ask Jeeves, Inc., et al. was filed against us and two of our officers and directors (collectively the Individual Defendants) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Also named as defendants were Morgan Stanley & Co,, Inc., FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Goldman Sachs & Co., U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, and Dain Rauscher, Inc., the underwriters of our initial public offering. The complaint alleges violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 against all defendants, and violations of Section 15 of the Securities Act against the Individual Defendants in connection with our initial public offering (IPO). An amended complaint was filed on December 6, 2001, which includes the same allegations in connection with our secondary offering in March 2000. The complaints seek unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of our common stock between June 30, 1999 and December 6, 2000. We believe the claims are without merit and intend to defend the actions vigorously.
In May 2, 2002, a stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, titled Brenner v. Strauch et al. The lawsuit purported to be filed on behalf of our company, asserting claims against the officers and directors at the time of our IPO. Also named as defendants were Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., and FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, the underwriters of our IPO. The complaint alleged breach of fiduciary duty, negligence an unjust enrichment of the named officers and directors, for acquiescing and/or conspiring with the underwriter defendants in underpricing the IPO. Upon Defendants motion, the lawsuit was transferred to the U.S. District Court in Northern California. On October 31, 2002, the Court dismissed the lawsuit, with prejudice. The plaintiff has appealed and the case has been consolidated with similar derivative actions. Appellate briefing will occur from late March to early May 2003.
In managements opinion, resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our results of operation, cash flows or financial position. However, depending on the amount and timing, an unfavorable resolution of these matters could materially and adversely affect our future results of operations, cash flows or financial position in a future period.
Item 2. | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
None.
Item 3. | Defaults Under Senior Securities |
Not applicable.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None.
Item 5. | Other Information |
None.
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
a) Exhibits
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the Signatures and Certifications sections of this report) are included, or incorporated by reference, in this quarterly report.
b) Reports on Form 8-K
We did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the first quarter of 2003.
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ASK JEEVES, INC. |
May 2, 2003
By: | /s/ A. GEORGE (SKIP) BATTLE |
|
|
A. George (Skip) Battle | |
Chief Executive Officer | |
(Principal Executive Officer) |
May 2, 2003
By: | /s/ STEVEN J. SORDELLO |
|
|
Steven J. Sordello | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
(Principal Financial Officer) |
May 2, 2003
By: | /s/ SCOTT T. BAUER |
|
|
Scott T. Bauer | |
Vice President and Corporate Controller | |
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
39
CERTIFICATIONS
I, A. George (Skip) Battle, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ask Jeeves, Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | |
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | |
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | |
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
May 2, 2003
By: | /s/ A. GEORGE (SKIP) BATTLE |
|
|
A. George (Skip) Battle | |
Chief Executive Officer |
40
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Steven J. Sordello, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ask Jeeves, Inc;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | |
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | |
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | |
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
May 2, 2003
By: | /s/ STEVEN J. SORDELLO |
|
|
Steven J. Sordello | |
Chief Financial Officer |
41
EXHIBIT INDEX
Pursuant to Item 601(a)(2) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit Index immediately precedes the exhibits.
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
Plans of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession | ||||
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 29, 1999, by and between the Registrant and AJ Merger Corporation (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of November 19, 1999, by and among the Registrant, Net Effect Systems, Inc. and Neutral Acquisition Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 18, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
2.3 | Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of January 25, 2000, by and among the Registrant, Direct Hit Technologies, Inc. and Answer Acquisition Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 14, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
2.4 | Certificate of Ownership and Merger Merging Net Effects Systems, Inc. and Direct Hit Technologies, Inc. with and into the Registrant, dated as of December 28, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 2.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
2.5 | Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of September 10, 2001, by and among the Registrant, Answer Acquisition Corp. No. 2, and Teoma Technologies, Inc., and solely with respect to Article X, Hawk Holdings, LLC, as Stockholders Agent, and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust, N.A., as Escrow Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 17, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Charter Documents | ||||
3.1.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of AJ Merger Corporation (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
3.1.2 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated July 6, 1999 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
3.1.3 | Certificate of Correction of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated as of April 6, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
3.1.4 | Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 10, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Bylaws | ||||
3.2 | Bylaws of the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders | ||||
4.1 | Specimen Certificate for Registrants Common Stock (previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, filed June 7, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
4.2.1 | Rights Agreement (commonly called a poison pill plan), dated as of April 26, 2001, between the Registrant and Fleet National Bank, N.A. (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 10, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). |
42
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
4.2.2 | Form of Rights Certificate (filed as Exhibit B to Rights Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2001, between the Registrant and Fleet National Bank, N.A., previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 10, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Equity Compensation Plan Documents | ||||
10.1.1.1 | 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.1.2 | Form of Option Agreement for the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.2.1 | 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated through May 25, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed November 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.2.2 | Form of Stock Option Grant Notice for the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (previously filed within Exhibit 10.4.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed April 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.2.3 | Form of Option Agreement for the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended through May 25, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed November 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.3.1 | 1999 Non-Qualified Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended through January 10, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed November 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.3.2 | Form of Option Agreement for the 1999 Non-Qualified Equity Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed November 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.3.3* | 2002 UK Approved Rules for Grants under the 1999 Non-Qualified Equity Plan, as adopted by the Registrant on January 13, 2003. | |||
10.1.4 | 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended through May 25, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed November 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Other Compensation-Related Agreements | ||||
10.2.1.1 | Offer letter dated as of January 5, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Frank A. Vaculin (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.1.2 | Severance terms as of April 30, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Frank A. Vaculin (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.1 | Offer letter dated as of May 27, 1999, by and between the Registrant and George S. Lichter (previously filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrants Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, filed June 7, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.2 | Incentive Agreement, entered into as of January 2, 2001, by and between the Registrant and George Lichter (previously filed as Exhibit 10.46.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.3 | Amendment to Incentive Agreement, dated June 18, 2001, by and between the Registrant and George Lichter (previously filed as Exhibit 10.46.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.4 | Second Amendment to Incentive Agreement, entered into as of August 30, 2001, by and between the Registrant and George Lichter (previously filed as Exhibit 10.46.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.5 | Separation Agreement, dated February 6, 2002, made by and between George Lichter and the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 10.46.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). |
43
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
10.2.3.1 | Offer letter dated as of December 8, 2000, by and between the Registrant and A. George (Skip) Battle (previously filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed April 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.3.2 | Offer letter of New Terms of Employment, dated April 3, 2001, by and between the Registrant and A. George (Skip) Battle (previously filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.3.3 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and A. George (Skip) Battle (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.3.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.4.1 | Promissory Note, dated March 15, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Steven J. Sordello (previously filed as Exhibit 10.43 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.4.2 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Steven J. Sordello (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.4.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.5 | Severance letter dated March 28, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Adam Klein (previously filed as Exhibit 10.39.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.6.1 | Offer letter dated April 23, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Steven Berkowitz (previously filed as Exhibit 10.42 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.6.2 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Steven Berkowitz (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.6.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.1 | Incentive Agreement, entered into as of January 2, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.45.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.2 | Amendment to Incentive Agreement, dated June 18, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.45.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.3 | Second Amendment to Incentive Agreement, entered into as of August 29, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.45.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.4 | Third Amendment to Incentive Agreement, entered into as of November 17, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.45.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.5 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.7.5 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.8 | Form of Indemnity Agreement by and between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers (previously filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1, filed May 10, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.9.1 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Brett M. Robertson (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.9.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.10.1 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Heather J. Staples (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.10.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.11 | Separation Agreement and Mutual Release, dated as of December 23, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Cynthia Pevehouse (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.11 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). |
44
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
U.S. Leases | ||||
10.3.1 | Office Lease dated as of April 29, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Emery Station Associates, L.L.C.(previously filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrants Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, filed June 7, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.3.2 | Master Lease Agreement dated as of June 15, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Comdisco, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit No. 4 to the Registrants Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1, filed June 29, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.3.3 | Lease Amendment and Termination Agreement, made February 4, 2002, by and between the Registrant, as Tenant, and Oakland City Center LLC, as Landlord (previously filed as Exhibit 10.48 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Ask Jeeves U.K. Documents | ||||
10.4.1 | Agreement Relating to the Sale and Purchase of the Entire Issued Share Capital of Carlton & Granada Internet Limited, dated as of February 7, 2002, by and among the Registrant, Carlton Communications PLC, Granada Media Group Limited, Carlton & Granada Internet Limited, Ask Jeeves (Jersey) Limited and Ask Jeeves International, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Form S-3, filed March 6, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.4.2 | Further Supplemental Partnership Deed relating to Ask Jeeves UK, dated February 14, 2002, by and among the Registrant, Carlton Communications PLC, Granada Media Group Limited, Carlton & Granada Internet Limited, Ask Jeeves (Jersey) Limited, Ask Jeeves International Inc. and Ask Jeeves UK (previously filed as Exhibit 10.49 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed April 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.4.3 | Tax Deed relating to the acquisition of the entire issued share capital of Carlton & Granada Internet Limited, dated March 6, 2002, by and among the Registrant, Carlton Communications PLC and Granada Media Group Limited (previously filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed April 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.4.4 | Underlease, dated March 15, 2000, by and between City & General (West End) Limited and the Ask Jeeves UKPartnership (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Japanese Joint Venture Documents | ||||
10.5.1 | Joint Venture Agreement by and between Trans Cosmos Inc. USA Pacific Holdings Company III, and Ask Jeeves International, Inc., dated as of August 31, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.5.2.1 | Distribution and License Agreement by and between Ask Jeeves International, Inc., Ask Jeeves Japan Co., Ltd., the Registrant, and Trans Cosmos, Inc., dated as of August 31, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5.2.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.5.2.2 | Amendment No. 1 to the Distribution and License Agreement by and between Ask Jeeves International, Inc. and Kabushiki Kaisha Ask Jeeves Japan, dated as of December 1, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5.2.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.5.2.3 | Amendment No. 2 to the Distribution and License Agreement by and between Ask Jeeves International, Inc. and Kabushiki Kaisha Ask Jeeves Japan, dated as of January 1, 2002 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5.2.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock of the Registrant | ||||
10.6.1 | Warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of Common Stock granted by the Registrant to Antenna Group Provided, dated as of June 30, 1998 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1, filed May 10, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). |
45
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
10.6.2 | Warrant to purchase 105,000 shares of Common Stock granted by the Registrant to Boris Katz, dated as of July 26, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.6.3 | Warrant to purchase 70,000 shares of Common Stock granted by the Registrant to Patrick Winston, dated as of July 26, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Registration Rights Agreements | ||||
10.7.1.1 | Form of Registration Rights Agreement, between the Registrant and Stockholders of Net Effect Systems, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1, filed February 23, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.7.2 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 10, 2001, by and between the Registrant and the multiple parties listed therein (previously filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 17, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Miscellaneous | ||||
10.8.1 | Advertising Services Agreement, dated July 17, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Google, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.52 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.8.2 | Amendment Number One to the Advertising Services Agreement, dated October 23, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Google, Inc (previously filed as Exhibit 10.8.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.9 | Agreement by and between the Registrant and The Wodehouse No. 3 Trust, dated as of January 1, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.10.1 | DART Service Agreement for Publishers by and between DoubleClick Inc. and the Registrant, effective as of March 31, 1999 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.10.2 | Addendum No. 1 to DART Service Agreement for Publishers by and between DoubleClick Inc. and the Registrant, effective as of October 1, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.10.3 | Addendum No. 2 to DART Service Agreement for Publishers by and between DoubleClick Inc. and the Registrant, effective as of March 30, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.10.4 | DFP Extension Addendum No. 3 to DART Service Agreement for Publishers by and between DoubleClick Inc. and the Registrant, effective as of November 1, 2002 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
21.1 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 21.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
99.1* | Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Filed herewith. |
| Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan. |
| Portions of this exhibit were omitted and filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. |
46