UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 27, 2004

OR

For the transition period from __________________ to _________________________

Commission file number: 000-49850

BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 536-0611

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o

     There were 22,670,327 shares of common stock, excluding treasury shares, with a par value of $0.01 per share outstanding at July 30, 2004.

BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION

INDEX

- 2 -

BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 3 -

BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 4 -

BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(in thousands)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 5 -

BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS CORPORATION

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Basis of Presentation and Description of Business

     We operate in one business segment, as a sporting goods retailer under the Big 5 Sporting Goods name carrying a broad range of hard goods, apparel and footwear, operating 295 stores at June 27, 2004 in California, Washington, Arizona, Oregon, Texas, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Idaho and Colorado. We are a holding company that operates our business through Big 5 Corp., our wholly owned subsidiary, and Big 5 Services Corp., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Big 5 Corp. Big 5 Services Corp. began operations at the beginning of fiscal 2004 to centralize the issuance and administration of gift certificates and gift cards.

     In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary to present fairly and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) the financial position as of June 27, 2004 and December 28, 2003, the results of operations for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003 and cash flows for the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 and June 29, 2003. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission; however, we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2003.

(2) Debt Redemption

     On April 15, 2004, we redeemed $15.0 million face value of our 10.875% senior notes due 2007 using borrowings under our credit facility. We also redeemed $20.0 million face value and $35.0 million face value of our 10.875% senior notes due 2007 during the first and fourth quarters of fiscal 2003, respectively, using borrowings under our credit facility.

- 6 -

(3) Earnings Per Share

     The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share of common stock:

(in thousands except earnings per share data)

     The computation of diluted earnings for the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 does not include 341,400 options that were outstanding at the end of the period. In addition, the computation of diluted earnings for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003 does not include 59,000 options that were outstanding at the end of the period. The exercise price of these options was greater than the average market price of our common stock during the relevant reporting periods and thus would have been antidilutive. The outstanding warrant was exercised in the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

(4) Stock-Based Compensation

     As permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended, we continue to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations and provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for employee stock option grants made in 1995 and future years as if the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS No. 123 had been applied. SFAS No. 123 was amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation –

- 7 -

Transition and Disclosure – An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. Therefore, compensation expense for stock options issued to employees is recorded on the date of grant only if the then-current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. If we had determined compensation cost based upon the fair value at the grant date for our stock options under SFAS No. 123 using the Black Scholes option pricing model, pro forma net income and pro forma net income per share, including the following weighted average assumptions used in these calculations, would have been as follows:

(5) Related Party Transactions

     Prior to September 1992, Big 5 Corp. was a wholly owned subsidiary of Thrifty Corporation (“Thrifty”), which was in turn a wholly owned subsidiary of Pacific Enterprises (“PE”). In December 1996, Thrifty was acquired by Rite Aid Corp. (“Rite Aid”).

     As a result of the Company’s prior relationship with Thrifty and its affiliates, the Company continues to maintain certain relationships with Rite Aid, PE and PE’s successor company, Sempra Energy. These relationships include continuing indemnification obligations of PE to the Company for certain environmental matters; agreements between the Company and PE with respect to various tax matters and obligations under ERISA, including the allocation of various tax obligations relating to the inclusion of the Company and each member of the affiliated group of which the Company was a subsidiary in certain consolidated and/or unitary tax returns of PE, and subleases. Green Equity Investors III, L.P., an affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., holds convertible preferred stock in Rite Aid, which, if converted, would represent approximately 13.0% of Rite Aid’s outstanding stock. Green Equity Investors, L.P., an affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., owned more than 27% of our outstanding common stock until it sold substantially all of its shares in a secondary public offering in November 2003.

(6) Contingencies

     The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

- 8 -

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

BASIS OF REPORTING

Net Sales

     Net sales consist of sales from all stores operated during the period presented, net of merchandise returns. Same store sales for a period reflect net sales from stores operated throughout that period as well as the corresponding prior period. New store sales for a period reflect net sales from stores opened in that period as well as net sales from stores opened during the prior fiscal year. Stores that are relocated during any period are treated as new stores.

Gross Profit

     Gross profit is comprised of net sales less all costs of sales, including the cost of merchandise, inventory markdowns, inventory shrinkage, inbound freight, distribution and warehousing, payroll for our buying personnel and store and corporate office occupancy costs. Store and corporate office occupancy costs include rent, contingent rents, common area maintenance, real estate property taxes and property insurance.

Selling and Administrative

     Selling and administrative includes store management and corporate expenses, including non-buying personnel payroll, employment taxes, employee benefits, management information systems, advertising, insurance other than property insurance, legal, store pre-opening expenses and other corporate level expenses. Store pre-opening expenses include store-level payroll, grand opening event marketing, travel, supplies and other store opening expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization

     Depreciation and amortization consists primarily of the depreciation of leasehold improvements, fixtures and equipment owned by us, amortization of leasehold interest and non-cash rent expense.

DISCUSSION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

     In the ordinary course of business, we have made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that the following discussion addresses our critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition.

- 9 -

Valuation of Inventory

     We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market using the weighted average cost method that approximates the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method. Management has evaluated the current level of inventories in comparison to planned sales volume and other factors and, based on this evaluation, has recorded adjustments to inventory and cost of goods sold for estimated decreases in inventory value. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from actual results if future economic conditions, consumer demand and competitive environments differ from our expectations. We are not aware of any events or changes in demand or price that would indicate to us that our inventory valuation may be materially inaccurate at this time.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets

     Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future net cash flows estimated by us to be generated by these assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. We are not aware of any events or changes in circumstances that would indicate to us that our long-lived assets are impaired or that would require an impairment consideration at this time.

- 10 -

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     The results of the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year.

13 Weeks Ended June 27, 2004 Compared to 13 Weeks Ended June 29, 2003

     The following table sets forth selected items from our operating results as a percentage of our net sales for the periods indicated:

     1. Net Sales. Net sales increased by $14.4 million, or 8.4%, to $184.5 million in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $170.1 million in the same period last year. This growth reflected an increase of $6.6 million in same store sales and an increase of $9.1 million in new store sales, which reflected the opening of four new stores, including two relocated stores, during the first 26 weeks of 2004 and 18 new stores since March 30, 2003. The remaining variance was attributable to net sales from closed stores. Same store sales increased 3.9% in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 versus the same period last year, representing the thirty-fourth consecutive quarterly increase in same store sales over comparable prior periods. This 3.9% increase in same store sales was attributable to higher sales in each of our three major product categories of footwear, hard goods and apparel. Store count at June 27, 2004 was 295 versus 275 at June 29, 2003. We opened one store in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004, and no stores in the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003. We expect to open 13 to 16 net new stores during the remainder of fiscal 2004.

     2. Gross Profit. Gross profit increased by $5.1 million, or 8.1%, to $67.7 million in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $62.6 million in the same period last year. Gross profit margin was 36.7% in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 compared to 36.8% in the same period last year. We achieved higher product selling margin comparisons in each of

- 11 -

our three major product categories; however, gross profit margin declined 0.1% as a result of higher warehouse and distribution costs, which increased 0.2% as a percent of net sales. Warehouse payroll and benefit expenses increased in order to support our store growth and to prepare for the new distribution center scheduled to open in fiscal 2005. In addition, higher gasoline prices negatively impacted trucking expense.

     3. Selling and Administrative. Selling and administrative expenses increased by $3.5 million, or 7.6%, to $50.0 million in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $46.5 million in the same period last year. The increase was driven by a $2.3 million increase in store-related expenses, including payroll and payroll taxes, as a result of store growth, as well as increased employee health benefit costs. Advertising expense increased by $0.9 million due to the growth in our store base since the same period last year. The remaining difference resulted from other administrative costs, such as corporate payroll and benefit expense. When measured as a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses were 27.1% for the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004, down from 27.3% in the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003. The decrease primarily resulted from a 0.2% decline in store salaries when measured as a percent of sales.

     4. Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.2 million, or 7.3%, to $2.7 million for the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $2.5 million for the same period last year, primarily due to the increase in store count to 295 stores at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from 275 stores at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2003.

     5. Redemption Premium and Unamortized Financing Fees Related to Redemption of Debt. Redemption premium and unamortized financing fees related to redemption of debt were $0.8 million in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004. There were no premium and unamortized financing fees related to redemption of debt in the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003. The $0.8 million charge in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 resulted from the redemption of $15.0 million face value of our 10.875% senior notes and the related carrying value of applicable deferred financing costs and original issue discount which totaled $0.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004.

     6. Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net, decreased by $1.3 million, or 43.9%, to $1.6 million in the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $2.9 million in the same period last year. Interest expense benefited from the redemption of $15.0 million of our 10.875% senior notes in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 and $35.0 million in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 through borrowings from our lower cost credit facility as well as a reduction in overall debt levels since the beginning of fiscal 2003.

     7. Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes was $5.0 million for the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 and $4.4 million for the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003. We accrue taxes at the statutory tax rate, which is reevaluated on an ongoing basis by management. In the 13 weeks ended June 27, 2004 we determined the Company’s effective tax rate to be 40%, down from 41% in the 13 weeks ended June 29, 2003, due in part to the growth in our store base outside of California.

- 12 -

26 Weeks Ended June 27, 2004 Compared to 26 Weeks Ended June 29, 2003

     The following table sets forth selected items from our operating results as a percentage of our net sales for the periods indicated:

     1. Net Sales. Net sales increased by $30.9 million, or 9.2%, to $365.5 million in the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $334.6 million in the same period last year. This growth reflected an increase of $15.0 million in same store sales and an increase of $17.6 million in new store sales, which reflected the opening of four new stores, including two relocated stores, during the first 26 weeks of 2004 and 19 new stores in fiscal 2003. The remaining variance was attributable to net sales from closed stores. Same store sales increased 4.5% in the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 versus the same period last year. This 4.5% increase in same store sales was attributable to higher sales in each of our three major product categories of footwear, hard goods and apparel. Store count at June 27, 2004 was 295 versus 275 at June 29, 2003. We opened four stores, including two relocated stores, in the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004. We opened one store and closed one store in the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003. We expect to open 13 to 16 net new stores during the remainder of fiscal 2004.

     2. Gross Profit. Gross profit increased by $12.9 million, or 10.7%, to $133.3 million in the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $120.4 million in the same period last year. Gross profit margin was 36.5% in the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 compared to 36.0% in the same period last year. We were able to achieve higher gross profit margins primarily due to improved product selling margin comparisons in each of our three major product categories, partially offset by a 0.2% increase in warehouse and distribution costs when measured as a percentage of sales. The 0.2% increase in warehouse and distribution costs was largely driven by higher warehouse payroll and benefit expenses to support our store growth and to prepare for the new distribution center scheduled to open in fiscal 2005. In addition, higher gasoline prices negatively impacted trucking expense.

- 13 -

     3. Selling and Administrative. Selling and administrative expenses increased by $8.0 million, or 8.7%, to $99.6 million in the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $91.6 million in the same period last year. The increase was driven by a $5.0 million increase in store-related expenses, including payroll and payroll taxes, as a result of store growth, as well as increased employee health benefit costs. Advertising expense increased by $1.8 million due to the growth in our store base since the same period last year. The remaining $1.2 million increase resulted from other administrative costs, such as corporate payroll and benefit expense. When measured as a percentage of net sales, selling and administrative expenses were 27.3% for the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004, down from 27.4% in the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003. The decrease primarily resulted from a 0.2% decline in store salaries when measured as a percent of sales.

     4. Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.5 million, or 9.1%, to $5.5 million for the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $5.0 million for the same period last year, primarily due to the increase in store count to 295 stores at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2004 from 275 stores at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2003.

     5. Redemption Premium and Unamortized Financing Fees Related to Redemption of Debt. Redemption premium and unamortized financing fees related to redemption of debt were $0.8 million in the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 versus $1.5 million during the same period last year. The $0.8 million charge in the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 resulted from the redemption of $15.0 million face value of our 10.875% senior notes and the related carrying value of applicable deferred financing costs and original issue discount which totaled $0.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2004. The $1.5 million charge in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2003 resulted from the redemption of $20.0 million face value of our 10.875% senior notes during the first quarter of fiscal 2003.

     6. Interest Expense, Net. Interest expense, net, decreased by $2.3 million, or 39.4%, to $3.6 million in the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 from $5.9 million in the same period last year. Interest expense benefited from the redemption of $15.0 million of our 10.875% senior notes in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 and $55.0 million in fiscal 2003 through borrowings from our lower cost credit facility as well as a reduction in overall debt levels since the beginning of fiscal 2003.

     7. Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes was $9.5 million for the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 and $6.7 million for the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003. We accrue taxes at the statutory tax rate, which is reevaluated on an ongoing basis by management. In the 26 weeks ended June 27, 2004 we determined the Company’s effective tax rate to be 40%, down from 41% in the 26 weeks ended June 29, 2003, due in part to the growth in our store base outside of California.

- 14 -

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

     Our principal liquidity requirements are for working capital and capital expenditures. We fund our liquidity requirements with cash on hand, cash flow from operations and borrowings under our credit facility.

     Net cash used by operating activities for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003 was $2.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively. The change between periods primarily reflects higher net income in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2004, partially offset by increased working capital requirements between periods to fund store growth.

     Capital expenditures for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2004 and 2003 were $3.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Expenditures for our planned new distribution center accounted for approximately $0.6 million of capital expenditures in the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2004. We expect capital expenditures for the remaining 26 weeks of fiscal 2004 to range from $15.0 to $20.0 million. We expect to spend $7.0 to $10.0 million primarily to fund the opening of approximately 13 to 16 net new stores (which includes store relocations), store improvements and remodelings, warehouse and headquarters improvements and computer hardware and software expenditures. In addition, we anticipate spending an estimated $8.0 to $10.0 million of the approximately $15.0 million of total capital spending requirements for our planned new distribution center, which is scheduled to be operational in the second half of fiscal 2005.

     Net cash provided by financing activities for the first 26 weeks of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003 was $3.6 million and $5.1 million, respectively. As of June 27, 2004, we had borrowings of $76.5 million and letter of credit commitments of $0.5 million outstanding under our credit facility and $33.1 million of our 10.875% senior notes outstanding. These balances compare to borrowings of $52.1 million and letter of credit commitments of $5.4 million outstanding under our credit facility and $82.8 million of our 10.875% senior notes outstanding as of June 29, 2003. On April 15, 2004, we redeemed $15.0 million face value of our 10.875% senior notes due 2007, using borrowings under our credit facility. We also redeemed $20.0 million face value and $35.0 million face value of our 10.875% senior notes due 2007 during the first and fourth quarters of fiscal 2003, respectively, using borrowings under our credit facility. We had $6.4 million of cash at June 27, 2004 and $6.9 million at June 29, 2003.

     We believe we will be able to fund our future cash requirements for operations from operating cash flows, cash on hand and borrowings under our credit facility. We believe these sources of funds will be sufficient to continue our operations and planned capital expenditures and satisfy our scheduled payments under debt obligations for at least the next twelve months. However, our ability to satisfy such obligations depends upon our future performance, which in turn is subject to general economic conditions and regional risks, and to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, including factors beyond our control. See “ Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results and Market Price of Our Common Stock.”

- 15 -

     Our principal future obligations and commitments, excluding periodic interest payments, include the following:

     Long-term debt consists of our 10.875% senior notes that mature on November 13, 2007. We expect to repay our 10.875% senior notes by the maturity date using a combination of cash flow from operations, drawings under our credit facility, an expansion or replacement of our credit facility and the issuance of debt or equity securities. The 10.875% senior notes are general unsecured obligations, which rank senior in right of payment to all of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness and pari passu in right of payment with all of our current and future unsubordinated indebtedness, subject to the security interests that have been granted in substantially all of our assets in connection with our credit facility.

     Operating lease commitments consist principally of leases for our retail store facilities, distribution center and corporate offices. These leases frequently include options which permit us to extend the terms beyond the initial fixed lease term. We intend to renegotiate those leases as they expire. Payments for these lease commitments are provided for by cash flows generated from operations.

     In April 2004 we signed an operating lease agreement for a new distribution facility in order to facilitate our store growth. The new distribution facility will be located in Riverside, California and will have approximately 952,900 square feet of storage and office space. We anticipate completing the construction of and transition to the new distribution center in fiscal 2005. The expected annual lease payments are included in the table above.

     We have a non-amortizing $140.0 million revolving credit facility. The credit facility may be terminated by the lenders by giving at least 90 days prior written notice before any anniversary date, commencing with its anniversary date on March 20, 2006. We may terminate the credit facility by giving at least 30 days prior written notice, provided that if we terminate prior to March 20, 2006, we must pay an early termination fee. Unless it is terminated, the credit facility will continue on an annual basis from anniversary date to anniversary date beginning on March 21, 2006. The facility is secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of our assets.

     The credit facility bears interest at various rates based on our performance, with a floor of LIBOR plus 1.50% or the JP Morgan Chase Bank prime lending rate and a ceiling of LIBOR plus 2.50% or the JP Morgan Chase Bank prime lending rate plus 0.75% and is secured by trade accounts receivable, merchandise inventory and general intangible assets

- 16 -

(including trademarks and trade names). At June 27, 2004, loans under the credit facility bear interest at a rate of LIBOR (1.33% at June 27, 2004) plus 1.50% or the JP Morgan Chase Bank prime lending rate (4.00% at June 27, 2004). An annual fee of 0.325%, payable monthly, is assessed on the unused portion of the amended and restated credit facility. On June 27, 2004, we had $76.5 million in LIBOR and prime lending rate borrowings and letters of credit of $0.5 million outstanding. Our maximum eligible borrowing available under the credit facility is limited to 71.15% of the aggregate value of eligible inventory during November and December, 67.24% during January and February, and 67.25% during the remaining months of the year. The maximum eligible borrowing available under the credit facility had been 70% of the aggregate value of eligible inventory from November through February and 65% of the aggregate value of eligible inventory during the remainder of the year. The advance rates changed in April 2004 following a scheduled appraisal by the credit facility agent. Available borrowings over and above actual borrowings and letters of credit outstanding on the credit facility amounted to $49.3 million at June 27, 2004.

     Our credit facility and the indenture governing our 10.875% senior notes contain various financial and other covenants, including covenants that require us to maintain various financial ratios, restrict our ability to incur indebtedness or to create various liens and restrict the amount of capital expenditures that we may incur. Our credit facility and the indenture governing our 10.875% senior notes also restrict our ability to engage in mergers or acquisitions, sell assets or pay dividends. We are currently in compliance with all covenants under our credit facility and the indenture governing our 10.875% senior notes.

     If we fail to make any required payment under our credit facility or the indenture governing our 10.875% senior notes or if we otherwise default under these instruments, our debt may be accelerated under these instruments. This acceleration could also result in the acceleration of other indebtedness that we may have outstanding at that time.

     If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our obligations and commitments, we will be required to refinance or restructure our indebtedness or raise additional debt or equity capital. Additionally, we may be required to sell material assets or operations or delay or forego expansion opportunities. We might not be able to affect these alternative strategies on satisfactory terms, if at all.

SEASONALITY

     We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating results. In fiscal 2003, we generated 27.0% of our net sales and 35.2% of our operating income in the fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the holiday selling season as well as the peak winter sports selling season. As a result, we incur significant additional expenses in the fourth fiscal quarter due to higher purchase volumes and increased staffing. If we miscalculate the demand for our products generally or for our product mix during the fourth fiscal quarter, our net sales, including same store sales, could decline, resulting in excess inventory, which could harm our financial performance. Because a substantial portion of our operating income is derived from our fourth fiscal quarter net sales, a shortfall in expected fourth fiscal quarter net sales could cause our annual operating results to suffer significantly.

- 17 -

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     This document includes certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, our financial condition, our results of operations, our growth strategy and the business of our company generally. In some cases, you can identify such statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “intends” or other such terminology. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this report and other risks and uncertainties more fully described in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution that the risk factors set forth in this report are not exclusive. In addition, we conduct our business in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment. Accordingly, new risk factors may arise. It is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor to assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any individual risk factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. We disclaim any obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by us or on our behalf.

- 18 -

RISK FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS AND MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK

     Set forth below and elsewhere in this report and in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have a substantial amount of debt, future cash flows may not be sufficient to meet our obligations and we might have difficulty obtaining more financing.

     We have a substantial amount of debt. As of June 27, 2004, the aggregate principal amount of our outstanding indebtedness was approximately $109.5 million. Our leveraged financial position means:

•		a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations will be required to service our indebtedness;
•		our ability to obtain financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes might be impeded; and
•		we are more vulnerable to economic downturns and our ability to withstand competitive pressures is limited.

     If our business declines, our future cash flow might not be sufficient to meet our obligations and commitments.

     If we fail to make any required payment under our credit facility or indenture, our debt may be accelerated under these instruments. In addition, in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency or a material breach of any covenant contained in one of our debt instruments, our debt may be accelerated. This acceleration could also result in the acceleration of other indebtedness that we may have outstanding at that time.

     If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our obligations and commitments, we will be required to refinance or restructure our indebtedness or raise additional debt or equity capital. Additionally, we may be required to sell material assets or operations or delay or forego expansion opportunities. These alternative strategies might not be effected on satisfactory terms, if at all.

The terms of our debt instruments impose operating and financial restrictions on us, which may impair our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions.

     The terms of our debt instruments impose operating and financial restrictions on us, including, among other things, restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, create or allow liens, pay dividends, engage in mergers, acquisitions or reorganizations or make specified capital expenditures. For example, our ability to engage

- 19 -

in the foregoing transactions will depend upon, among other things, our level of indebtedness at the time of the proposed transaction and whether we are in default under our financing agreements. As a result, our ability to respond to changing business and economic conditions and to secure additional financing, if needed, may be significantly restricted, and we may be prevented from engaging in transactions that might further our growth strategy or otherwise benefit us without obtaining consent from our lenders. In addition, our credit facility is secured by a first priority security interest in our trade accounts receivable, merchandise inventories, service marks and trademarks and other general intangible assets, including trade names. In the event of our insolvency, liquidation, dissolution or reorganization, the lenders under our debt instruments would be entitled to payment in full from our assets before distributions, if any, were made to our stockholders.

If we are unable to successfully implement our controlled growth strategy or manage our growing business, our future operating results could suffer.

     One of our strategies includes opening profitable stores in new and existing markets. Our ability to successfully implement our growth strategy could be negatively affected by any of the following:

•		suitable sites may not be available for leasing;
•		we may not be able to negotiate acceptable lease terms;
•		we might not be able to hire and retain qualified store personnel; and
•		we might not have the financial resources necessary to fund our expansion plans.

     In addition, our expansion in new and existing markets may present competitive, distribution and merchandising challenges that differ from our current challenges. These potential new challenges include competition among our stores, added strain on our distribution center, additional information to be processed by our management information systems and diversion of management attention from ongoing operations. We face additional challenges in entering new markets, including consumers’ lack of awareness of us, difficulties in hiring personnel and problems due to our unfamiliarity with local real estate markets and demographics. New markets may also have different competitive conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns than our existing markets. To the extent that we are not able to meet these new challenges, our net sales, including same store sales, could decrease and our operating costs could increase.

Because our stores are concentrated in the western United States, we are subject to regional risks.

     Our stores are located in the western United States. Because of this, we are subject to regional risks, such as the economy, weather conditions, power outages, electricity and gasoline costs, and earthquakes and other natural disasters specific to the states in which we operate. For example, particularly in southern California where we have a high concentration of stores, seasonal factors such as unfavorable snow conditions (such as those that occurred in the winter of 2002-2003), inclement weather or other localized conditions such as flooding, fires (such as the major fires in 2003), earthquakes or electricity

- 20 -

blackouts could harm our operations. State and local regulatory compliance, including workers compensation costs, also can impact our financial results. If the region were to suffer an economic downturn or other adverse regional event, our net sales, including same store sales, and profitability and our ability to implement our planned expansion program could suffer. Several of our competitors operate stores across the United States and thus are not as vulnerable to these regional risks.

If we lose key management or are unable to attract and retain the talent required for our business, our operating results could suffer.

     Our future success depends to a significant degree on the skills, experience and efforts of Steven G. Miller, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and other key personnel who are not obligated to stay with us. The loss of the services of any of these individuals could harm our business and operations. In addition, as our business grows, we will need to attract and retain additional qualified personnel in a timely manner and develop, train and manage an increasing number of management level sales associates and other employees. Competition for qualified employees could require us to pay higher wages and benefits to attract a sufficient number of employees, and increases in the federal minimum wage or other employee benefits costs could increase our operating expenses. If we are unable to attract and retain personnel as needed in the future, our net sales growth, including same store sales growth, and operating results may suffer.

Our hardware and software systems are vulnerable to damage that could harm our business.

     Our success, in particular our ability to successfully manage inventory levels, largely depends upon the efficient operation of our computer hardware and software systems. We use management information systems to track inventory information at the store level, communicate customer information and aggregate daily sales information. These systems and our operations are vulnerable to damage or interruption from:

•		earthquake, fire, flood and other natural disasters;
•		power loss, computer systems failures, internet and telecommunications or data network failure, operator negligence, improper operation by or supervision of employees, physical and electronic loss of data or security breaches, misappropriation and similar events; and
•		computer viruses.

     Any failure that causes an interruption in our operations or a decrease in inventory tracking could result in reduced net sales, including same store sales, and profitability.

If our suppliers do not provide sufficient quantities of products, our net sales and profitability could suffer.

     We purchase merchandise from over 750 vendors. Although we did not rely on any single vendor for more than 6.0% of our total purchases during the twelve months ended June 27, 2004, our dependence on principal suppliers involves risk. Our 20 largest vendors collectively accounted for 37.9% of our total purchases during the twelve months ended

- 21 -

June 27, 2004. If there is a disruption in supply from a principal supplier or distributor, we may be unable to obtain merchandise that we desire to sell and that consumers desire to purchase. In addition, a significant portion of the products that we purchase, including those purchased from domestic suppliers, are manufactured abroad. A vendor could discontinue selling products to us at any time for reasons that may or may not be in our control. Our net sales, including same store sales, and profitability could decline if we are unable to promptly replace a vendor who is unwilling or unable to satisfy our requirements with a vendor providing equally appealing products.

Because all of our stores rely on a single primary distribution center and a satellite distribution center, any disruption could reduce our net sales.

     We currently rely on a single primary distribution center in Fontana, California, as well as a satellite distribution center to handle seasonal merchandise and returns. Any natural disaster or other serious disruption to the primary distribution center due to fire, earthquake or any other cause could damage a significant portion of our inventory and could materially impair both our ability to adequately stock our stores and our net sales, including same store sales, and profitability. Any similar event which affects our satellite distribution center could materially impair our ability to adequately stock our stores with seasonal merchandise, which could also materially impair our net sales, including same store sales, and profitability. If the security measures used at our distribution centers do not prevent inventory theft, our gross margin may significantly decrease.

     Due to limited capacity at the current primary distribution center, we recently entered into a 10-year lease with three five-year renewal options for a replacement distribution center and expect to begin construction in the second half of fiscal 2004. We anticipate completing the construction of and transition to the new distribution center in the second half of fiscal 2005. Any disruption to, or delay in, this process could harm our future operations.

Because equity owners of a significant stockholder of one of our competitors serve on our board of directors and the board of directors of such competitor, there may be conflicts of interest.

     Green Equity Investors, L.P., an affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., holds approximately 7.7% of the outstanding common stock of The Sports Authority, Inc., one of our competitors. John G. Danhakl, an equity owner of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., currently serves on our board of directors. Jonathan D. Sokoloff, an equity owner of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. and a former member of our board of directors, currently serves on The Sports Authority, Inc.’s board of directors. Mr. Danhakl may have conflicts of interest with respect to certain matters affecting us, including the pursuit of certain business opportunities presented to Leonard Green & Partners, L.P. All potential conflicts may not be resolved in a manner that is favorable to us. We believe it is impossible to predict the precise circumstances under which future potential conflicts may arise and therefore intend to address potential conflicts on a case-by-case basis. Under Delaware law, directors have a

- 22 -

fiduciary duty to act in good faith and in what they believe to be in the best interest of the corporation and its stockholders. Such duties include the duty to refrain from impermissible self-dealing and to deal fairly with respect to transactions in which the directors, or other companies with which such directors are affiliated, have an interest.

Recently enacted and proposed changes in securities laws and regulations are likely to increase our costs.

     The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) that became law in July 2002, as well as new rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), have required and will require changes in some of our corporate governance practices. The Act also requires the SEC to promulgate additional new rules on a variety of subjects. In addition to final rules and rule proposals already made by the SEC, Nasdaq has revised its requirements for companies that are quoted on The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.’s National Market. We expect these new rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more difficult, time consuming and/or costly. We also expect these new rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These new rules and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to serve on our audit committee, and qualified executive officers.

Risks Related to Our Industry

A downturn in the economy may affect consumer purchases of discretionary items, which could reduce our net sales.

     In general, our sales represent discretionary spending by our customers. Discretionary spending is affected by many factors, including, among others, general business conditions, interest rates, inflation, consumer debt levels, the availability of consumer credit, taxation, electricity power rates, gasoline prices, unemployment trends and other matters that influence consumer confidence and spending. Our customers’ purchases of discretionary items, including our products, could decline during periods when disposable income is lower or periods of actual or perceived unfavorable economic conditions. If this occurs, our net sales, including same store sales, and profitability could decline.

Seasonal fluctuations in the sales of sporting goods could cause our annual operating results to suffer significantly.

     We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating results. In fiscal 2003, we generated 27.0% of our net sales and 35.2% of our operating income in the fourth fiscal quarter, which includes the holiday selling season as well as the peak winter sports selling season. As a result, we incur significant additional expenses in the fourth fiscal quarter due to higher purchase volumes and increased staffing. If we miscalculate the demand for our products generally or for our product mix during the fourth fiscal quarter, our net sales, including same store sales, could decline, resulting in excess inventory, which

- 23 -

could harm our financial performance. Because a substantial portion of our operating income is derived from our fourth fiscal quarter net sales, a shortfall in expected fourth fiscal quarter net sales could cause our annual operating results to suffer significantly.

Intense competition in the sporting goods industry could limit our growth and reduce our profitability.

     The retail market for sporting goods is highly fragmented and intensely competitive. We compete directly or indirectly with the following categories of companies:

•		other traditional sporting goods stores and chains;
•		mass merchandisers, discount stores and department stores, such as Wal-Mart, Kmart, Target, Kohl’s, JC Penney, and Sears;
•		specialty sporting goods shops and pro shops, such as The Athlete’s Foot and Foot Locker;
•		sporting goods superstores, such as The Sports Authority, Inc., and its other operating units, Oshman’s, Sportmart and Gart Sports Company; and
•		internet retailers.

     Some of our competitors have a larger number of stores and greater financial, distribution, marketing and other resources than we have. Two of our major competitors, The Sports Authority, Inc. and Gart Sports Company (including its other operating units, Oshman’s and Sportmart), completed a merger in August 2003. In addition, if our competitors reduce their prices, it may be difficult for us to reach our net sales or same store sales goals without reducing our prices. As a result of this competition, we may also need to spend more on advertising and promotion than we anticipate. If we are unable to compete successfully, our operating results will suffer.

We may incur costs from litigation or increased regulation relating to products that we sell, particularly firearms.

     We sell products manufactured by third parties, some of which may be defective. If any product that we sell were to cause physical injury or injury to property, the injured party or parties could bring claims against us as the retailer of the product. Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover every claim that could be asserted against us. If a successful claim were brought against us in excess of our insurance coverage, it could harm our business. Even unsuccessful claims could result in the expenditure of funds and management time and could have a negative impact on our business. In addition, our products are subject to the Federal Consumer Product Safety Act, which empowers the Consumer Product Safety Commission to protect consumers from hazardous sporting goods and other articles. The Consumer Product Safety Commission has the authority to exclude from the market certain consumer products that are found to be hazardous. Similar laws exist in some states and cities in the United States. If we fail to comply with government and industry safety standards, we may be subject to claims, lawsuits, fines and negative publicity that could harm our operating results.

- 24 -

     In addition, we sell firearms and ammunition, products associated with an increased risk of injury and related lawsuits. Sales of firearms and ammunition have historically represented less than 5% of our annual net sales. We may incur losses due to lawsuits relating to our performance of background checks on firearms purchases as mandated by state and federal law or the improper use of firearms sold by us, including lawsuits by municipalities or other organizations attempting to recover costs from firearms manufacturers and retailers relating to the misuse of firearms. In addition, in the future there may be increased federal, state or local regulation, including taxation, of the sale of firearms in both our current markets as well as future markets in which we may operate. Commencement of these lawsuits against us or the establishment of new regulations could reduce our net sales, including same stores sales, and decrease our profitability.

If we fail to anticipate changes in consumer preferences, we may experience lower net sales, higher inventory markdowns and lower margins.

     Our products must appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted with certainty. These preferences are also subject to change. Our success depends upon our ability to anticipate and respond in a timely manner to trends in sporting goods merchandise and consumers’ participation in sports. If we fail to identify and respond to these changes, our net sales, including same store sales, may decline. In addition, because we often make commitments to purchase products from our vendors up to six months in advance of the proposed delivery, if we misjudge the market for our merchandise, we may over-stock unpopular products and be forced to take inventory markdowns that could have a negative impact on profitability.

Terrorism and the uncertainty of war may harm our operating results.

     Terrorist attacks or acts of war may cause damage or disruption to us and our employees, facilities, information systems, vendors, and customers, which could significantly impact our net sales (including same store sales), costs and expenses and financial condition. The threat of terrorist attacks since September 11, 2001 continues to create many economic and political uncertainties. The potential for future terrorist attacks, the national and international responses to terrorist attacks and other acts of war or hostility may cause greater uncertainty and cause our business to suffer in ways that we currently cannot predict. Military action taken by the United States and its allies in Iraq or elsewhere could have a short or long term negative economic impact upon the financial markets and our business in general.

Risks Related to Investing in Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may be volatile.

     The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate widely as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside our control. In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of many companies. These broad market fluctuations could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. A significant decline in our stock price could result in substantial

- 25 -

losses for individual stockholders and could lead to costly and disruptive securities litigation.

Substantial amounts of our common stock could be sold in the near future, which could depress our stock price.

     We cannot predict the effect, if any, that the availability of shares of common stock for sale will have on the market price of our common stock prevailing from time to time. At July 30, 2004, there were 22,670,327 shares of our common stock outstanding, excluding treasury shares. All of these shares are freely transferable without restriction or further registration under the federal securities laws, except for any shares held by our affiliates, sales of which will be limited by Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. Sales of a significant number of these shares of common stock in the public market could reduce the market price of the common stock or our ability to raise capital by offering equity securities.

Our anti-takeover provisions could prevent or delay a change in control of our company, even if such change of control would be beneficial to our stockholders.

     Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws as well as provisions of Delaware law could discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of our company, even if such change in control would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions include:

•		a board of directors that is classified such that only one-third of directors are elected each year;
•		authorization of the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors to increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover attempt;
•		limitations on the ability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders;
•		prohibition of stockholder action by written consent and requiring all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders; and
•		establishment of advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

     In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporations Law limits business combination transactions with 15% stockholders that have not been approved by the board of directors. These provisions and other similar provisions make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without negotiation. These provisions may apply even if the transaction may be considered beneficial by some stockholders.

- 26 -

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

     We are subject to risks resulting from interest rate fluctuations since interest on our borrowings under our revolving credit facility is based on variable rates. If the LIBOR rate were to increase 1.0% in 2004 as compared to the rate at June 27, 2004, our interest expense for 2004 would increase $0.8 million based on the outstanding balance of our revolving credit facility at June 27, 2004. We do not hold any derivative instruments and do not engage in hedging activities.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that (1) information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission and (2) this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity’s disclosure objectives. The likelihood of achieving such objectives is affected by limitations inherent in disclosure controls and procedures. These include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal controls can occur because of human failures such as simple errors or mistakes or intentional circumvention of the established process. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Under the supervision and review of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 27, 2004. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that they are alerted in a timely manner to material information regarding us that is required to be included in our periodic reports. In addition, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those controls since June 27, 2004, the date as of which our disclosure controls and procedures were last evaluated.

- 27 -

     PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

     We are from time to time involved in routine litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. We regularly review all pending litigation matters in which we are involved and establish reserves deemed appropriate by management for such litigation matters. We believe no litigation currently pending against us will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     On June 2, 2004, we held our annual meeting of stockholders. Sandra N. Bane and Michael D. Miller, both of whom are Class B directors, were re-elected to our board of directors. The term of office for the following directors continued after the meeting: G. Michael Brown (Class A director), John G. Danhakl (Class A director), Jennifer Holden Dunbar (Class C director) and Steven G. Miller (Class C director).

     At the annual meeting, our stockholders approved the proposal to elect two Class B directors to the our board of directors, each to hold office until the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders (and until each such director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified):

Item 5. Other Information

     None.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

     (a) Exhibits

- 28 -

     (b) Reports on Form 8-K

          A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed on July 23, 2004 to report the issuance of a press release on July 23, 2004 announcing our net sales for the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 2004.

          A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed on August 4, 2004 to report the issuance of a press release on August 4, 2004 announcing our financial information for the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 2004.

- 29 -

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

- 30 -