Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

United States
Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003

or

( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 23346

EQUITY MARKETING, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  13-3534145
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
     
6330 San Vicente Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA

(Address of principal executive offices)
   
90048
(Zip Code)

(323) 932-4300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  [ X ]   No  [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  [  ]   No  [ X ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date:

Common Stock, $.001 Par Value, 5,699,453 shares as of November 12, 2003.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 32.1


Table of Contents

EQUITY MARKETING, INC.

Index To Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
Filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
September 30, 2003

                 
            Page
           
Part I.  
Financial Information
       
       
Item 1. Financial Statements
    3  
       
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
    19  
       
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
    26  
Part II.  
Other Information
       
       
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
    27  

2


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EQUITY MARKETING, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)

ASSETS

                     
        December 31,   September 30,
        2002   2003
       
 
                (Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 25,833     $ 13,806  
 
Marketable securities
    1,000       2,500  
 
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of $2,033 and $2,482 as of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2003, respectively)
    43,817       31,103  
 
Inventories, net (Note 2)
    16,363       17,669  
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    4,807       5,704  
 
   
     
 
   
Total current assets
    91,820       70,782  
Fixed assets, net
    4,185       3,560  
Goodwill (Notes 2 and 6)
    33,730       40,778  
Other intangibles, net (Notes 2 and 6)
    769       1,226  
Other assets
    2,750       5,448  
 
   
     
 
   
Total assets
  $ 133,254     $ 121,794  
 
   
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

EQUITY MARKETING, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                     
        December 31,   September 30,
        2002   2003
       
 
                (Unaudited)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
               
 
Accounts payable
  $ 38,334     $ 27,332  
 
Accrued liabilities
    24,329       14,990  
 
 
   
     
 
   
Total current liabilities
    62,663       42,322  
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
    1,596       6,431  
 
 
   
     
 
   
Total liabilities
    64,259       48,753  
 
 
   
     
 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
               
Mandatory redeemable preferred stock, Series A senior cumulative participating convertible, $.001 par value per share, 25,000 issued and outstanding, stated at liquidation preference of $1,000 per share ($25,000), net of issuance costs
    23,049       23,049  
 
 
   
     
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
               
 
Preferred stock, $.001 par value per share, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 25,000 Series A issued and outstanding
           
 
Common stock, $.001 par value per share, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 5,716,503 and 5,758,653 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2003, respectively
           
 
Additional paid-in capital
    21,641       23,686  
 
Retained earnings
    38,689       42,009  
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    1,710       2,141  
 
 
   
     
 
 
    62,040       67,836  
Less—
               
 
Treasury stock, 3,007,108 and 3,077,008 shares, at cost, as of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2003, respectively (Note 4)
    (15,506 )     (16,480 )
 
Unearned compensation
    (588 )     (1,364 )
 
 
   
     
 
   
Total stockholders’ equity
    45,946       49,992  
 
 
   
     
 
   
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 133,254     $ 121,794  
 
 
   
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

EQUITY MARKETING, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)

                                     
        Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
        September 30,   September 30,
       
 
        2002   2003   2002   2003
       
 
 
 
REVENUES
  $ 53,119     $ 48,948     $ 136,385     $ 153,468  
COST OF SALES
    38,084       35,513       99,865       112,566  
FORGIVENESS OF NOTE RECEIVABLE
                1,685        
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Gross profit
    15,035       13,435       34,835       40,902  
 
   
     
     
     
 
OPERATING EXPENSES:
                               
 
Salaries, wages and benefits
    6,054       6,141       14,979       17,539  
 
Selling, general and administrative
    5,490       5,546       14,552       17,056  
 
Integration costs
    161             219        
 
Restructuring charge
    178             178        
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Total operating expenses
    11,883       11,687       29,928       34,595  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Income from operations
    3,152       1,748       4,907       6,307  
OTHER INCOME, net
    121       188       191       495  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
    3,273       1,936       5,098       6,802  
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
    1,142       609       1,752       2,357  
 
   
     
     
     
 
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES
    2,131       1,327       3,346       4,445  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax (Note 2)
                2,496        
 
   
     
     
     
 
NET INCOME
    2,131       1,327       850       4,445  
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
    375       375       1,125       1,125  
 
   
     
     
     
 
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
  $ 1,756     $ 952     $ (275 )   $ 3,320  
 
   
     
     
     
 
BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
                               
Income per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
  $ 0.31     $ 0.17     $ 0.39     $ 0.58  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
                (0.44 )      
 
   
     
     
     
 
BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
  $ 0.31     $ 0.17     $ (0.05 )   $ 0.58  
 
   
     
     
     
 
BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
    5,740,001       5,750,736       5,714,546       5,719,677  
 
   
     
     
     
 
DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
                               
Income per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
  $ 0.28     $ 0.15     $ 0.38     $ 0.55  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
                (0.42 )      
 
   
     
     
     
 
DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
  $ 0.28     $ 0.15     $ (0.05 )   $ 0.55  
 
   
     
     
     
 
DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
    7,582,285       6,160,484       5,908,233       6,029,523  
 
   
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

EQUITY MARKETING, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)

                                   
      Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
      September 30,   September 30,
     
 
      2002   2003   2002   2003
     
 
 
 
NET INCOME
  $ 2,131     $ 1,327     $ 850     $ 4,445  
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
                               
 
Foreign currency translation adjustments (Note 2)
    222       34       1,164       540  
 
Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency forward contracts (Note 2)
    130       67       (40 )     (109 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
  $ 2,483     $ 1,428     $ 1,974     $ 4,876  
 
   
     
     
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
condensed consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

EQUITY MARKETING, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)

                         
            Nine Months Ended
            September 30,
           
            2002   2003
           
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
 
Net income
  $ 850     $ 4,445  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
               
     
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
    2,496        
     
Depreciation and amortization
    1,311       1,434  
     
Provision for doubtful accounts
    334       232  
     
Gain on disposal of fixed assets
    (12 )     (19 )
     
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
    16       75  
     
Forgiveness of note receivable
    1,685        
     
Amortization of restricted stock
    33       259  
     
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
       
 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents:
               
       
Accounts receivable
    (4,250 )     17,664  
       
Note receivable
    498        
       
Inventories
    (2,430 )     (381 )
       
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    2,552       738  
       
Other assets
    75       (837 )
       
Accounts payable
    (1,234 )     (15,160 )
       
Accrued liabilities
    4,120       (11,369 )
       
Long-term liabilities
    (92 )     85  
 
   
     
 
       
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    5,952       (2,834 )
 
   
     
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
     
Purchases of fixed assets
    (624 )     (527 )
     
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
    133       74  
     
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
    6,700        
     
Payment for purchase of UPSHOT
    (9,997 )      
     
Payment for purchase of SCI, net of cash acquired of $162
          (6,075 )
     
Purchase of marketable securities
          (1,500 )
 
   
     
 
       
Net cash used in investing activities
    (3,788 )     (8,028 )
 
   
     
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
     
Payment of preferred stock dividends
    (1,125 )     (1,125 )
     
Purchase of treasury stock
    (391 )     (974 )
     
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    130       935  
 
   
     
 
       
Net cash used in financing activities
    (1,386 )     (1,164 )
 
   
     
 
       
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    778       (12,026 )
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    134       (1 )
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
    21,935       25,833  
 
   
     
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
  $ 22,847     $ 13,806  
 
   
     
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
               
 
CASH PAID FOR:
               
   
Interest
  $ 184     $ 164  
 
   
     
 
   
Income taxes
  $ 255     $ 3,275  
 
   
     
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

EQUITY MARKETING, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2003
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Equity Marketing, Inc., a Delaware corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a leading global marketing services company based in Los Angeles, with offices in Chicago, New York, Ontario (CA), London, Paris and Hong Kong. The Company focuses on the design and execution of strategy-based marketing programs, with particular expertise in the areas of: strategic planning and research, entertainment marketing, design and manufacturing of custom promotional products, promotion, event marketing, collaborative marketing, and environmental branding. The Company’s clients include Burger King Corporation, Diageo, Kellogg’s, Kohl’s, Macy’s, Nordstrom’s, and Procter & Gamble, among others. The Company complements its core marketing services business by developing and marketing distinctive consumer products, based primarily on licensed properties, which are sold through specialty and mass-market retailers. The Company primarily sells to customers in the United States and Europe. The Company’s functional currency is United States dollars.

Equity Marketing Hong Kong, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (“EMHK”), is a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company. EMHK manages production of the Company’s products by third parties in the Far East and currently is responsible for performing and/or procuring product sourcing, product engineering, quality control inspections, independent safety testing and export/import documentation.

Logistix Limited, a United Kingdom corporation (“Logistix”), is a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company. Logistix is a marketing services agency which focuses primarily on assisting consumer packaged goods companies in their efforts to market to children between the ages of seven and fourteen by developing and executing premium-based promotions and by providing marketing consulting services. Logistix also derives a portion of its revenues from a consumer products business which holds the license for the Robot Wars® entertainment property, among others.

On July 17, 2002, the Company acquired the principal assets of Promotional Marketing, L.L.C. d/b/a UPSHOT, an Illinois limited liability company (“UPSHOT”). UPSHOT is a marketing agency, specializing in promotion, event marketing, collaborative marketing and environmental branding. UPSHOT has a reputation for creating successful integrated marketing programs for world class brands such as Diageo, and Procter & Gamble.

On September 3, 2003, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of S.C.I. Promotion Group, LLC (“SCI”), a privately held promotional marketing services company based in Ontario, California. SCI specializes in the development and execution of promotional campaigns that utilize purchase-with-purchase, gift-with-purchase, incentives, promotional licenses and promotional retail programs. SCI counts nine of the top ten department stores in the United States among its clients, including May Department Stores, Sears, Kohl’s, Nordstrom’s, and Macy’s. Major clients also include consumer product companies such as Anheuser Busch, Scripto and VF Corporation, owner of the Lee and Wrangler jeans brands.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In the opinion of management and subject to year-end audit, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

8


Table of Contents

Net Income per Share

Basic net income per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Net income available to common stockholders represents reported net income less preferred stock dividend requirements.

Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Diluted EPS includes in-the-money options, warrants and restricted stock units (see Stock Based-Compensation) using the treasury stock method and also includes the dilutive effect of the assumed conversion of preferred stock using the if-converted method. Options and warrants to purchase 1,918,666 and 1,146,666 shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), as of September 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as they would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2002, preferred stock convertible into 1,694,915 shares of common stock was included in the computation of diluted EPS as it was dilutive. For the three months ended September 30, 2003, preferred stock convertible into 1,694,915 shares of common stock was excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as it would have been anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2003, preferred stock convertible into 1,694,915 shares of common stock was excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as it would have been anti-dilutive.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computation for “income available to common shareholders” and other disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128, “Earnings per Share”:

                                                     
        For the Three Months Ended September 30,
       
        2002   2003
       
 
        Income   Shares   Per Share   Income   Shares   Per Share
        (Numerator)   (Denominator)   Amount   (Numerator)   (Denominator)   Amount
       
 
 
 
 
 
Basic EPS:
                                               
Income available to common stockholders
  $ 1,756       5,740,001     $ 0.31     $ 952       5,750,736     $ 0.17  
 
                   
                     
 
Preferred stock dividends
    375                                    
Effect of dilutive securities:
                                               
   
Options and warrants
          147,369                     331,598          
   
Restricted stock units
                              78,150          
   
Convertible preferred stock
          1,694,915                              
 
   
     
             
     
         
Dilutive EPS:
                                               
 
Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversion
  $ 2,131       7,582,285     $ 0.28     $ 952       6,160,484     $ 0.15  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
                                                     
        For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
       
        2002   2003
       
 
        Loss   Shares   Per Share   Income   Shares   Per Share
        (Numerator)   (Denominator)   Amount   (Numerator)   (Denominator)   Amount
       
 
 
 
 
 
Basic EPS:
                                               
Income (loss) available to common stockholders
  $ (275 )     5,714,546     $ (0.05 )   $ 3,320       5,719,677     $ 0.58  
 
                   
                     
 
Effect of dilutive securities:
                                               
   
Options and warrants
          193,687                     258,912          
   
Restricted stock units
                              50,934          
 
   
     
             
     
         
Dilutive EPS:
                                               
 
Income (loss) available to common stockholders
  $ (275 )     5,908,233     $ (0.05 )   $ 3,320       6,029,523     $ 0.55  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 

9


Table of Contents

Inventories

Inventories consist of (a) production-in-process which primarily represents tooling costs which are deferred and amortized over the life of the products and deferred costs on service contracts and (b) purchased finished goods held for sale to customers and purchased finished goods in transit to customers’ distribution centers. Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market. As of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2003, inventories consisted of the following:

                 
    December 31,   September 30,
    2002   2003
   
 
Production-in-process
  $ 5,062     $ 1,745  
Finished goods
    11,301       15,924  
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 16,363     $ 17,669  
 
   
     
 

Foreign Currency Translation

Net foreign exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign subsidiaries’ accounts whose functional currency is not the United States dollar are recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. For such subsidiaries, accounts are translated into United States dollars at the following rates of exchange: assets and liabilities at period-end exchange rates, equity accounts at historical rates, and income and expense accounts at average exchange rates during the period.

For subsidiaries with transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currency, net foreign exchange transaction gains or losses are included in determining net income. Transaction gains included in net income for the quarters ended September 30, 2002 and 2003 were $103 and $179, respectively.

Derivative Instruments

The Company adopted SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” which establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires that an entity recognize derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation.

The Company designates its derivatives based upon criteria established by SFAS No. 133. For a derivative designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss is recognized in earnings in the period of change together with the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributed to the risk being hedged. For a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged exposure affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in earnings immediately.

The Company uses derivatives to manage exposures to foreign currency. The Company’s objective for holding derivatives is to decrease the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency. The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to minimize the short-term impact of foreign currency fluctuations on foreign currency receivables, investments, and payables. The gains and losses on the foreign exchange forward contracts offset the transaction gains and losses on the foreign currency receivables, investments, and payables recognized in earnings. The Company does not enter into foreign exchange forward contracts for trading purposes. Gains and losses on the contracts are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations and offset foreign exchange gains or losses from the revaluation of intercompany balances or other current assets, investments, and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the reporting entity. The Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts related to current assets and liabilities generally range from one to nine months in original maturity.

The Company’s Logistix subsidiary entered into foreign currency forward contracts aggregating GBP 3,872 to sell Euros in exchange for pound sterling and to sell pound sterling in exchange for United States dollars. The contracts will expire by December 22, 2003. At September 30, 2003, the foreign currency forward contracts had an estimated fair value of $(134). The fair value of the foreign currency forward contracts is recorded in accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2003. The unrealized loss on the contracts is reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income.

10


Table of Contents

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” were approved by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) effective June 30, 2001 for business combinations consummated after June 30, 2001. SFAS No. 141 eliminates the pooling-of-interests method for business combinations and requires use of the purchase method. SFAS No. 142 changes the accounting for goodwill and certain other intangible assets from an amortization approach to a non-amortization (impairment) approach. The statement requires amortization of goodwill recorded in connection with previous business combinations to cease upon adoption of the statement by calendar year companies on January 1, 2002. The statement required the Company to perform a transitional goodwill impairment test, using values as of the beginning of the fiscal year that SFAS No. 142 is adopted. The Company completed the goodwill transitional impairment test in the second quarter of 2002. As a result, the Company determined that a non-cash charge in the amount of $2,496, net of tax, was required relating to the goodwill resulting from the 1998 acquisition of Contract Marketing, Inc. and U.S. Import and Promotions Co., collectively referred to as “USI.” The transition charge is reflected as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principles effective January 1, 2002, and therefore, results for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 have been adjusted retroactively. Subsequent to the transition charge, the balance of the USI goodwill was $8,198. The Company has adopted the provisions of these statements for the acquisition of Logistix effective July 1, 2001 and for all other acquisitions effective January 1, 2002. Accordingly, beginning on January 1, 2002, the Company has foregone all related goodwill amortization expense.

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill from $33,730 as of December 31, 2002 to $40,778 as of September 30, 2003 reflects: a foreign currency translation adjustment of $530, an adjustment to reflect the net increase to goodwill for the Upshot acquisition of $2,782 (see Note 6) and $3,736 for the acquisition of SCI (see Note 6). Of the goodwill balance, $8,318 relates to the consumer products segment and $32,460 relates to the marketing services segment.

Identifiable intangibles of $1,226 as of September 30, 2003 and $769 as of December 31, 2002, a portion of which are subject to amortization, are included in other intangibles in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the carrying value of assets acquired, including goodwill, are reviewed annually. During such a review the Company will estimate the fair value of the reporting unit to which the assets were assigned by discounting the reporting unit’s estimated future cash flows before interest. The Company will compare the discounted cash flows to the carrying value of the acquired net assets to determine if an impairment loss has occurred. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds their estimated fair values. In the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company performed the annual impairment test required by SFAS No. 142 and determined that its goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, 2002.

Royalties

The Company enters into agreements to license intellectual properties such as trademarks, copyrights, and patents. The agreements may call for minimum amounts of royalties to be paid in advance and throughout the term of the agreement, which are non-refundable in the event that product sales fail to meet certain minimum levels. Advance royalties resulting from such transactions are stated at the lower of the amounts paid or the amounts estimated to be recoverable from future sales of the related products. Furthermore, minimum guaranteed royalty commitments are reviewed on a periodic basis to ensure that amounts are recoverable based on estimates of future sales of the products under license. A loss provision will be recorded in the consolidated statements of operations to the extent that future minimum royalty guarantee commitments are not recoverable. Estimated future sales are projected based on historical experience, including that of similar products, and anticipated advertising and marketing support by the licensor.

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair-value for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS No. 148 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2002. The interim disclosure provisions are effective for financial reports containing financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002.

As of September 30, 2003, the Company has one stock option plan; the Equity Marketing, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “2000 Employee Plan”). The 2000 Employee Plan terminates on June 27, 2010. In accordance with provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company applies Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting

11


Table of Contents

for its stock option plans and, accordingly, does not recognize compensation cost for grants whose exercise price equals the market price of the stock on the date of grant. If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the options granted at grant date as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated in the table below:

                                        
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
   
 
    2002   2003   2002   2003
   
 
 
 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders - as reported
  $  1,756     $ 952     $ (275 )   $ 3,320  
Less:
                               
Compensation expense (a)
    216       398       983       1,236  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders - pro forma
  $ 1,540     $ 554     $ (1,258 )   $ 2,084  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Earnings (loss) per share:
                               
Basic earnings (loss) per share, as reported
  $ 0.31     $ 0.17     $ (0.05 )   $ 0.58  
Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.27     $ 0.10     $ (0.22 )   $ 0.36  
Diluted earnings (loss) per share, as reported
  $ 0.28     $ 0.15     $ (0.05 )   $ 0.55  
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.25     $ 0.09     $ (0.21 )   $ 0.35  

     (a)  Determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax.

Because the SFAS No. 123 method of accounting has not been applied to options granted prior to January 1, 1995, the resulting pro forma compensation cost may not be representative of the cost to be expected in future years.

During the first quarter of 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 2000 Employee Plan to permit the grant of restricted stock units in addition to stock options, restricted stock grants and stock bonuses previously provided for under the 2000 Employee Plan. Effective April 1, 2003, a total of 74,650 restricted stock units with an aggregate market value as of the grant date of $971 were granted to employees under the 2000 Employee Plan. In September 2003, a total of 3,500 restricted stock units with an aggregate market value as of the grant date of $51 were granted to SCI employees under the 2000 Employee Plan. Unearned compensation was charged upon grant for the market value of these restricted stock units. The units vest over a four year period subject to continued employment with the Company. Compensation expense attributable to these units was $62 and $123 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. The underlying shares of common stock are issuable on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant; provided, however, that shares underlying vested restricted stock units are issuable earlier upon termination of employment, disability or hardship.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which the obligation is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. SFAS No. 143 is effective for 2003. The Company implemented SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. The impact of such adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” SFAS No. 145 requires that gains and losses from extinguishment of debt be classified as extraordinary items only if they meet the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30 (“Opinion No. 30”). Applying the provisions of Opinion No. 30 will distinguish transactions that are part of an entity’s recurring operations from those that are unusual and infrequent and meet the criteria for classification as an extraordinary item. SFAS No. 145 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2003. The Company implemented SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003. The impact of such adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which supercedes Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity.” SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit activity or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. EITF Issue No. 94-3 requires recognition of a liability at the date an entity commits to an exit plan. All provisions of SFAS No. 146 were effective

12


Table of Contents

for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 146, the Company’s previously issued financial statements will not be restated. The Company implemented SFAS No. 146 on January 1, 2003. The impact of such adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, a guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of an obligation assumed under a guarantee. FIN 45 also requires additional disclosures by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about the obligations associated with guarantees issued. The recognition provisions of FIN 45 are effective for any guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The Company implemented FIN 45 on January 1, 2003. The impact of such adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 will be the guidance that determines (1) whether consolidation is required under the “controlling financial interest” model of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (“ARB 51”), “Consolidated Financial Statements” or, alternatively, (2) whether the variable interest model under FIN 46 should be used to account for existing and new entities. The variable interest model of FIN 46 looks to identify the “primary beneficiary” of a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary is the party that is exposed to the majority of the risk or stands to benefit the most from the variable interest entity’s activities. A variable interest entity would be required to be consolidated if certain conditions are met. FIN 46 effective dates and transition provisions will be required for pre-existing entities as of the beginning of the first interim period beginning after December 15, 2003. Management does not believe that the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2003, SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” was issued. In general, this statement amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. This statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In May 2003, SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” was issued, which requires that certain financial instruments must now be accounted for as liabilities. The financial instruments affected include mandatorily redeemable stock, certain financial instruments that require or may require the issuer to buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets and certain obligations that can be settled with shares of stock. SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and were applied to the Company’s existing financial instruments effective July 1, 2003, the beginning of the first fiscal period after June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 on July 1, 2003, did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures. The Company’s mandatory redeemable preferred stock does not have a fixed and determinable redemption date and, therefore, is not impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 150.

In May 2003, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 01-8, “Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease.” The new requirements of EITF No. 01-8 potentially affects companies that sell or purchase products or services through supply, commodity, transportation and data-processing outsourcing contracts. The guidance in this new release is designed to mandate reporting revenue as rental or leasing income that would otherwise be reported as part of product sales or services revenue. EITF No. 01-8 requires both parties to an arrangement to determine whether a service contract or similar arrangement includes a lease within the scope of SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” which means focusing on agreements conveying the right to use property, plant or equipment. The consensus is effective prospectively to arrangements agreed to, modified or acquired in business combinations in fiscal periods beginning after May 28, 2003 (the quarter beginning July 1, 2003 for the Company). The adoption of EITF No. 01-8 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 — LINE OF CREDIT

On April 24, 2001, the Company signed a credit facility (the “Facility”) with Bank of America. The Facility is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets and provides for a line of credit of up to $35,000 for three years from the date of closing with borrowing availability determined by a formula based on qualified assets. Interest on outstanding borrowings will be based on either a fixed rate equivalent to LIBOR plus an applicable spread of between 1.50 and 2.25 percent or a variable rate equivalent to the bank’s reference rate plus an applicable spread of between zero and 0.50 percent. The Company is also required to pay an unused line

13


Table of Contents

fee of between zero and 0.60 percent per annum and certain letter of credit fees. The applicable spread is based on the achievement of certain financial ratios. The Facility also requires the Company to comply with certain restrictions and covenants as amended from time to time. On November 14, 2001, February 8, 2002, September 30, 2002 and November 14, 2003, certain covenants under the facility were amended. As of September 30, 2003, the Company was in compliance with the amended restrictions and covenants. The Facility may be used for working capital and acquisition financing purposes. As of September 30, 2003, there were no amounts outstanding under the Facility.

Letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2002 and September 30, 2003 totaled $823 and $1,438, respectively.

NOTE 4 — STOCK REPURCHASE

On July 21, 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized up to $10,000 for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock over a twelve month period. In the period from July 21, 2000 to July 21, 2001, the Company spent $6,430 to purchase an aggregate of 523,594 shares at an average price of $12.28 per share including commissions. On July 24, 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10,000 for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock over a twelve month period. In the period from August 2, 2001 through July 11, 2002, the Company spent $5,605 to purchase 454,715 shares at an average price of $12.33 per share including commissions. On July 12, 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10,000 for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock. The Company spent $2,316 to repurchase 177,400 shares at an average price of $13.05 per share including commissions under this authorization through September 30, 2003. The duration of the current buyback program is indefinite; provided, however, that the Company’s Board of Directors intends to review the program quarterly. Purchases are conducted in the open market at prevailing prices, based on market conditions when the Company is not in a quiet period. The Company may also transact purchases effected as block trades, as well as certain negotiated, off-exchange purchases not in the open market. Since initiating the overall buyback program on July 20, 2000, the Company has spent $14,351 to purchase a total of 1,155,709 shares at an average price of $12.42 per share including commissions through September 30, 2003. This repurchase program is being funded through working capital.

NOTE 5 — SEGMENTS

Effective January 1, 1998, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” The Company has identified two reportable segments through which it conducts its continuing operations: Marketing Services and Consumer Products. The factors for determining the reportable segments were based on the distinct nature of their operations. They are managed as separate business units because each requires and is responsible for executing a unique business strategy. The Marketing Services segment designs and produces promotional products used as free premiums or sold in conjunction with the purchase of other items at a retailer or quick service restaurant and provides various services such as strategic planning and research, entertainment marketing, promotion, event marketing, collaborative marketing and environmental branding. The Consumer Products segment designs and contracts for the manufacture of toys and other consumer products for sale to major mass market and specialty retailers, who in turn sell the products to consumers.

Earnings of industry segments and geographic areas exclude interest income, interest expense, depreciation expense, and other unallocated corporate expenses. Income taxes are allocated to segments on the basis of operating results. Identified assets are those assets used in the operations of the segments and include inventory, receivables, goodwill and other intangibles. Corporate assets consist of cash, certain corporate receivables, fixed assets, and certain trademarks.

Certain information presented in the tables below has been reclassified to conform to the current management structure as of January 1, 2003. Specifically, the results and assets of the USI division, which had previously been reported as part of Marketing Services, are now being reported as part of Consumer Products, which is consistent with management responsibility for this business. The majority of the revenues for the USI division represent sales of made-to-order custom product to Oil & Gas and other retailers who in turn sell the products to consumers. As a result of the similarities between the USI business and the Consumer Products business, the USI division was merged into the Consumer Products division in connection with the Company’s restructuring in 2002 (see “Note – 7 Restructuring” below).

14


Table of Contents

Industry Segments

                                 
    As of and For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2002
   
    Marketing   Consumer                
    Services   Products   Corporate   Total
   
 
 
 
Total revenues
  $ 42,097     $ 11,022     $     $ 53,119  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
  $ 7,254     $ 947     $ (4,928 )   $ 3,273  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    2,664       331       (1,853 )     1,142  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 4,590     $ 616     $ (3,075 )   $ 2,131  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Fixed asset additions
  $     $     $ 167     $ 167  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 65     $ 17     $ 426     $ 508  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Total assets
  $ 60,630     $ 16,321     $ 35,774     $ 112,725  
 
   
     
     
     
 
                                 
    As of and For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2003
   
    Marketing   Consumer                
    Services   Products   Corporate   Total
   
 
 
 
Total revenues
  $ 41,513     $ 7,435     $     $ 48,948  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
  $ 5,995     $ 761     $ (4,820 )   $ 1,936  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    1,954       248       (1,593 )     609  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 4,041     $ 513     $ (3,227 )   $ 1,327  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Fixed asset additions
  $     $     $ 154     $ 154  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 21     $ 66     $ 411     $ 498  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Total assets
  $ 73,794     $ 16,957     $ 31,043     $ 121,794  
 
   
     
     
     
 
                                 
    As of and For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002
   
    Marketing   Consumer                
    Services   Products   Corporate   Total
   
 
 
 
Total revenues
  $ 109,794     $ 26,591     $     $ 136,385  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
  $ 16,488     $ 1,155     $ (12,545 )   $ 5,098  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    5,728       331       (4,307 )     1,752  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
    10,760       824       (8,238 )     3,346  
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
          2,496             2,496  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 10,760     $ (1,672 )   $ (8,238 )   $ 850  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Fixed asset additions
  $     $     $ 624     $ 624  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 134     $ 49     $ 1,128     $ 1,311  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Total assets
  $ 60,630     $ 16,321     $ 35,774     $ 112,725  
 
   
     
     
     
 
                                 
    As of and For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003
   
    Marketing   Consumer                
    Services   Products   Corporate   Total
   
 
 
 
Total revenues
  $ 130,396     $ 23,072     $     $ 153,468  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
  $ 17,820     $ 2,973     $ (13,991 )   $ 6,802  
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
    6,351       1,083       (5,077 )     2,357  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 11,469     $ 1,890     $ (8,914 )   $ 4,445  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Fixed asset additions
  $     $     $ 527     $ 527  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Depreciation and amortization
  $ 68     $ 128     $ 1,238     $ 1,434  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Total assets
  $ 73,794     $ 16,957     $ 31,043     $ 121,794  
 
   
     
     
     
 

15


Table of Contents

NOTE 6 — ACQUISITIONS

On July 17, 2002, the Company consummated the acquisition of UPSHOT, a marketing agency with expertise in promotion, event marketing, collaborative marketing and environmental branding. The Company financed the acquisition through its existing cash reserves. The acquisition was consummated pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 22, 2002, by and among the Company, Promotional Marketing, LLC (“Promotional Marketing”) and HA-LO Industries, Inc. (“HA-LO”) (the “Purchase Agreement”). Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired the principal assets of Promotional Marketing (consisting of the principal assets used in connection with the operation of the UPSHOT business) for $9,206 in cash plus related transaction costs of $685. This purchase price is net of $106 received in the fourth quarter of 2002 for a closing balance sheet working capital adjustment. The Company assumed the principal current liabilities of the UPSHOT business in connection with the acquisition. In addition to the cash purchase price paid at the closing, the Company may be obligated to pay additional consideration to Promotional Marketing contingent upon the results of certain performance targets attained in the twelve month period ending July 31, 2003. The additional consideration, if any, will be recorded as goodwill. Based on actual results through July 31, 2003, the Company does not expect to be obligated to pay any additional consideration. HA-LO, which is the parent company of Promotional Marketing, was in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings as of the acquisition date, and the Company’s acquisition of the UPSHOT business was approved by the United States bankruptcy court.

The UPSHOT acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The financial statements reflect the allocation of the purchase price to the acquired net assets based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the preliminary allocation of the purchase price was adjusted to revise the estimated value of prepaid expenses ($72 increase), deferred tax assets ($1,852 increase), accrued liabilities ($168 decrease) and non-current liabilities ($4,874 increase). These adjustments resulted in a net increase to goodwill of $2,782. The adjustments to increase non-current liabilities are attributable to a final determination of an unfavorable lease liability for UPSHOT’s Chicago, Illinois office totaling $2,975 and to an adjustment totaling $1,900 due to the finalization of an exit plan (see Note 7 – Restructuring) both of which were contemplated as of the close of the transaction. The unfavorable lease liability reflects the present value of the lease payments in excess of market for the remaining term of the Chicago office lease. The increase in deferred tax assets reflects the tax benefit associated with the increase in non-current liabilities. Subsequent to these adjustments, the Company’s allocation of purchase price for the acquisition, based upon estimated fair values is as follows:

         
Net current assets
  $ 7,029  
Property, plant and equipment
    700  
Other non-current assets
    1  
Net current liabilities
    (7,783 )
Non-current liabilities
    (4,874 )
 
   
 
Estimated fair value, net liabilities assumed
    (4,927 )
Goodwill
    14,631  
Other intangible assets
    187  
 
   
 
Total purchase price
  $ 9,891  
 
   
 

The intangible assets of $187 are comprised of customer contracts and related customer relationships and sales order backlog, and are being amortized over estimated useful lives ranging from 6 to 12 months. Intangible assets associated with the UPSHOT acquisition are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Goodwill has an indefinite life and is not amortized.

On September 3, 2003, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of SCI, a privately held promotional marketing services company based in Ontario, California. The Company financed the acquisition through its existing cash reserves. The acquisition was consummated pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 3, 2003, by and among the Company, SCI and Joseph J. Schmidt, III (the “Purchase Agreement”). Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of SCI for a cash purchase price of approximately $5.9 million (before closing balance sheet working capital adjustment), plus additional earnout consideration of up to $3.5 million based upon future performance of the acquired business. Net of a holdback of $250, the Company paid $5,683 in cash plus related transaction costs of $554. The Company also assumed the operating liabilities of the business in connection with the acquisition. The earnout consideration is based upon the business achieving targeted levels of earning before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) over the period from 2003 through 2006. The earnout payments, if required, are payable 50% in cash and 50% in shares of the Company’s common stock. The additional consideration, if any, will be recorded as goodwill.

16


Table of Contents

The SCI acquisition has been accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The financial statements reflect the preliminary allocation of the purchase price to the acquired net assets based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The Company is in the process of finalizing valuations of the individual assets and liabilities which would result in an adjustment to goodwill and other intangibles. The allocation of the purchase price may change based upon these valuations. The allocation reflects a receivable from SCI resulting from a closing balance sheet working capital adjustment of $855, accruing interest at the rate of 5% per annum, that will offset additional earnout consideration. This receivable is recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2003. The Company’s preliminary allocation of purchase price for the acquisition, based upon estimated fair values is as follows:

         
Net current assets
  $ 6,671  
Receivable from SCI
    855  
Property, plant and equipment
    37  
Other non-current assets
    13  
Net current liabilities
    (5,710 )
 
   
 
Estimated fair value, net assets acquired
    1,866  
Goodwill
    3,736  
Other intangible assets
    635  
 
   
 
Total purchase price
  $ 6,237  
 
   
 

The intangible assets of $635 are comprised of customer contracts and related customer relationships and sales order backlog, and are being amortized over estimated useful lives ranging from 4 months to 5 years. Intangible assets associated with the SCI acquisition are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Goodwill has an indefinite life and is not amortized.

SCI was formed in June 2002 when SCI’s management purchased the assets and assumed certain liabilities of SCI’s predecessor business from Aspen Marketing, Inc. (a privately held promotions company). In conjunction with this acquisition, SCI’s management implemented a number of significant structural changes in the business and ascribed different underlying basis to SCI’s assets and liabilities than previously ascribed by Aspen Marketing, Inc. As a result of the acquisition and the changes in the business, the Company’s management believes that the financial information for SCI for the first half of 2002 is not meaningful or relevant. The pro forma information shown below for 2002 excludes the impact of the SCI acquisition. The following selected unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations are presented as if the UPSHOT acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of 2002 and as if the SCI acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 2003 after giving effect to certain adjustments for the amortization of intangibles, reduced interest income and related income tax effects.

The pro forma data is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the results of operations had the businesses operated as one during the period. No effect has been given for synergies, if any, that may have been realized through the acquisitions.

                                 
    Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    September 30,   September 30,
   
 
    2002   2003   2002   2003
   
 
 
 
Pro forma revenues
  $ 54,867     $ 55,013     $ 150,386     $ 170,090  
Pro forma net income (loss)
  $ 2,071     $ 1,633     $ (39 )   $ 4,663  
Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.30     $ 0.22     $ (0.20 )   $ 0.62  
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.27     $ 0.20     $ (0.20 )   $ 0.59  

Refer to Note 2 for further discussion of the method of computation of earnings per share.

NOTE 7 — RESTRUCTURING

During the third quarter of 2002, the Company formulated and implemented a restructuring plan in connection with the UPSHOT acquisition in order to combine and streamline the operations of the Company and UPSHOT. The Company evaluated the current cost structure of both businesses. In connection with this plan the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $178. This charge represents severance for a workforce reduction of seven employees in the Company’s Los Angeles office, who were terminated, and is reflected as a restructuring charge in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The workforce reduction included

17


Table of Contents

employees from the Company’s marketing services division as well as other support services. The full amount of the restructuring charge was paid as of September 30, 2003.

In connection with the restructuring plan, the Company also decided to close UPSHOT’s Richmond, Virginia office and eliminate certain positions at UPSHOT’s Chicago, Illinois office. Additionally, in 2003 the Company finalized its exit plan with respect to vacating half of its leased space (thirty thousand square feet) at UPSHOT’s Chicago, Illinois office. This resulted in an adjustment to the liabilities recorded and an increase to goodwill of $1,900 for the present value of the remaining lease payments for the vacated office space in excess of the estimated sub-lease income. The liabilities assumed in connection with this restructuring plan totaled $3,535 and are included as part of goodwill in accordance with EITF Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.” $1,155 of these liabilities were paid as of September 30, 2003.

NOTE 8 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

On July 15, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with U.S. Capital Investors, Inc. (“USCI”), an entity controlled by Jeffrey S. Deutschman, pursuant to which USCI will serve as an advisor to the Company with respect to potential mergers and acquisitions through December 31, 2003. Mr. Deutschman currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Company as the representative of the holder of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock. The Company’s agreement with USCI provides for the payment of a discretionary success fee for completed acquisition transactions in an amount determined by an independent committee of the Board in accordance with certain guidelines and criteria. The guidelines for fees payable upon successful completion of an acquisition transaction are $200 for up to $10,000 of consideration, 1.5% of consideration from $10,000 to $25,000 and 1% of consideration over $25,000; provided, however, that the success fee for the first transaction under the agreement has an initial fee guideline of $275 for up to $10,000 of consideration. Notwithstanding the guidelines, the independent committee has absolute discretion in determining the amount, if any, of the success fee for any transaction. The USCI agreement provides for the payment of a refundable advance against success fees in the aggregate amount of $275. The USCI agreement was approved by the Board and acknowledged by the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock. The Company believes that this agreement will enhance its ability to analyze and close merger and acquisition transactions in a manner that is more cost effective than traditional outside advisory firms. In connection with the acquisition of SCI (see Note 6 – Acquisitions), USCI earned a success fee of $275. This success fee is recorded as a transaction cost of the SCI acquisition.

18


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Cautionary Statement

Certain expectations and projections regarding the future performance of Equity Marketing, Inc. (the “Company”) discussed in this quarterly report are forward-looking and are made under the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These expectations and projections are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data along with the Company’s operating plans and are subject to future events and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward looking terminology, such as may, will, should, expect, anticipate, estimate, continue, plans, intends or other similar terminology. Management cautions that the following factors, among others, could cause the Company’s actual consolidated results of operations and financial position in 2003 and thereafter to differ significantly from those expressed in forward-looking statements:

Marketplace Risks

  Dependence on a single customer, Burger King, which may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
 
  Increased competitive pressure, which may affect the sales of the Company’s products and services.
 
  Dependence on the popularity of licensed entertainment properties, which may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
 
  Concentration risk associated with accounts receivable. The Company regularly extends credit to several distribution companies in connection with its business with Burger King.
 
  Significant quarter-to-quarter variability in the Company’s revenues and net income, which may result in operating results below the expectations of securities analysts and investors.
 
  Dependence on foreign manufacturers, which may increase the costs of the Company’s products and affect the demand for such products.

Financing Risks

  Currency fluctuations, which may affect the Company’s suppliers and the Company’s reportable income.

Other Risks

  Products that we develop or sell may expose us to liability from claims by users of such products for damages including, but not limited to, bodily injury or property damage. We currently maintain product liability insurance coverage in amounts that we believe are adequate. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain such coverage or obtain additional coverage on acceptable terms in the future, or that such insurance will provide adequate coverage against all potential claims.
 
  Exposure to liability for the costs related to product recalls. These costs can include legal expenses, advertising, collection and destruction of product, and free goods. The Company’s product liability insurance coverage generally excludes such costs and damages resulting from product recall.
 
  Potential negative impact of past or future acquisitions, which may disrupt the Company’s ongoing business, distract senior management and increase expenses.
 
  Adverse results of litigation, governmental proceedings or environmental matters, which may lead to increased costs or interruption in normal business operations of the Company.
 
  Changes in laws or regulations, both domestically and internationally, including those affecting consumer products or environmental activities or trade restrictions, which may lead to increased costs.
 
  Strike and other labor disputes which may negatively impact the distribution channels for the Company’s products.
 
  Exposure to liabilities for minimum royalty commitments in connection with license agreements for entertainment properties. The Company enters into significant minimum royalty commitments from time to time in connection with its consumer products business.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to forward-looking statements, which may be made to reflect events or circumstance after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. The risks highlighted herein should not be assumed to be the only items that could affect future performance of the Company. In addition to the information contained in this document, readers are advised to review the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Cautionary Statements and Risk Factors.”

19


Table of Contents

Organization and Business

Equity Marketing, Inc., a Delaware corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a leading global marketing services company based in Los Angeles, with offices in Chicago, New York, Ontario (CA), London, Paris and Hong Kong. The Company focuses on the design and execution of strategy-based marketing programs, with particular expertise in the areas of: strategic planning and research, entertainment marketing, design and manufacturing of custom promotional products, promotion, event marketing, collaborative marketing, and environmental branding. The Company’s clients include Burger King Corporation, Diageo, Kellogg’s, Kohl’s, Macy’s, Nordstrom’s, and Procter & Gamble, among others. The Company complements its core marketing services business by developing and marketing distinctive consumer products, based primarily on licensed properties, which are sold through specialty and mass-market retailers. The Company primarily sells to customers in the United States and Europe. The Company’s functional currency is United States dollars.

Equity Marketing Hong Kong, Ltd., a Delaware corporation (“EMHK”), is a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company. EMHK manages production of the Company’s products by third parties in the Far East and currently is responsible for performing and/or procuring product sourcing, product engineering, quality control inspections, independent safety testing and export/import documentation.

Logistix Limited, a United Kingdom corporation (“Logistix”), is a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company. Logistix is a marketing services agency which focuses primarily on assisting consumer packaged goods companies in their efforts to market to children between the ages of seven and fourteen by developing and executing premium-based promotions and by providing marketing consulting services. Logistix also derives a portion of its revenues from a consumer products business which holds the license for the Robot Wars® entertainment property, among others.

On July 17, 2002, the Company acquired the principal assets of Promotional Marketing, L.L.C. d/b/a UPSHOT, an Illinois limited liability company (“UPSHOT”). UPSHOT is a marketing agency, specializing in promotion, event marketing, collaborative marketing and environmental branding. UPSHOT has a reputation for creating successful integrated marketing programs for world class brands such as Diageo, and Procter & Gamble.

On September 3, 2003, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of S.C.I. Promotion Group, LLC (“SCI”), a privately held promotional marketing services company based in Ontario, California. SCI specializes in the development and execution of promotional campaigns that utilize purchase-with-purchase, gift-with-purchase, incentives, promotional licenses and promotional retail programs. SCI counts nine of the top ten department stores in the United States among its clients, including May Department Stores, Sears, Kohl’s, Nordstrom’s, and Macy’s. Major clients also include consumer product companies such as Anheuser Busch, Scripto and VF Corporation, owner of the Lee and Wrangler jeans brands.

20


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the Company’s operating results as a percentage of total revenues:

                                       
          Three Months   Nine Months
          Ended September 30,   Ended September 30,
         
 
          2002   2003   2002   2003
         
 
 
 
Revenues
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of sales
    71.7       72.6       73.3       73.3  
Forgiveness of note receivable
                1.2        
 
   
     
     
     
 
     
Gross profit
    28.3       27.4       25.5       26.7  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Operating expenses:
                               
 
Salaries, wages and benefits
    11.4       12.6       11.0       11.4  
 
Selling, general and administrative
    10.4       11.3       10.6       11.1  
 
Integration costs
    0.3             0.2        
 
Restructuring charge
    0.3             0.1        
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Total operating expenses
    22.4       23.9       21.9       22.5  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Income from operations
    5.9       3.5       3.6       4.2  
Other income, net
    0.2       0.4       0.1       0.3  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
    6.1       3.9       3.7       4.5  
Provision for income taxes
    2.1       1.2       1.3       1.6  
 
   
     
     
     
 
   
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
    4.0       2.7       2.4       2.9  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
                (1.8 )      
 
   
     
     
     
 
     
Net income
    4.0 %     2.7 %     0.6 %     2.9 %
 
   
     
     
     
 

Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 (In Thousands):

Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2003 decreased $4,171, or 7.9%, to $48,948 from $53,119 in the comparable period in 2002. Marketing Services revenues decreased $584, or 1.4%, to $41,513 primarily as a result of decreased revenues associated with Burger King programs in 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. This decrease was partially offset by the inclusion of revenues generated by SCI for the period from September 3, 2003 through September 30, 2003 and an increase in promotional revenues from Kellogg’s. The results for 2002 exclude SCI (acquired September 3, 2003) and approximately two weeks of UPSHOT (acquired July 17, 2002). Excluding the impact of the SCI acquisition, revenues decreased 14.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. Consumer product revenues decreased $3,587, or 32.5%, to $7,435 primarily as a result of decreased sales of Scooby-Doo, Robot Wars® and Tub Tints® product, partially offset by increased sales of Crayola® product and product based on Disney’s Kim Possible. Revenues for Scooby-Dooproduct in 2002 were higher primarily due to increased shipments attributable to the Scooby-Doofeature film, which was released in the Summer of 2002.

Cost of sales decreased $2,571 to $35,513 (72.6% of revenues) for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $38,084 (71.7% of revenues) in the comparable period in 2002 due to the lower sales volume in 2003. The gross margin percentage decreased to 27.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from 28.3% in the comparable period for 2002. This decrease is primarily the result of lower margins in the Burger King business for the three months ended September 30, 2003 resulting from increased vendor costs, the provision of lower margin logistical services and general pricing pressures. The margin decrease in the Burger King business was partially offset by higher margins for consumer products as a result of higher margin new product introductions and effective inventory management.

Salaries, wages and benefits increased $87, or 1.4%, to $6,141 (12.6% of revenues) for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $6,054 (11.4% of revenues) in the comparable period for 2002. This increase was primarily attributable to the addition of employees from the acquisition of SCI partially offset by a reduction in performance bonuses for employees in 2003.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $56, or 1.0%, to $5,546 (11.3% of revenues) for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $5,490 (10.4% of revenues) in the comparable period for 2002. The increase is primarily the result of additional operating expenses resulting from the acquisition of SCI, partially offset by lower selling expenses.

21


Table of Contents

For the three months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded integration costs of $161 (0.3% of revenues). These costs represent expenses directly related to the integration of UPSHOT such as travel, training and consulting.

For the three months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $178 (0.3% of revenues). This restructuring charge represents severance for workforce reductions made in 2002 to combine and streamline the operations of the Company subsequent to the acquisition of UPSHOT.

Net other income increased $67 to $188 for the three months ended September 30, 2003 from $121 in the comparable period for 2002. This increase was attributable to foreign exchange gains, partially offset by reduced net interest income attributable to a reduced level of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as a result of cash utilized for the acquisition of SCI.

The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was 31.5 % compared to 34.9% for the same period in 2002. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily the result of revised estimates of state income tax apportionment factors and an increase in the relative mix of earnings being generated internationally in territories which have more favorable tax rates.

Net income decreased $804 to $1,327 (2.7% of revenues) in 2003 from $2,131 (4.0% of revenues) in 2002 primarily due to the decrease in gross profit earned on lower revenues in 2003, partially offset by an increase in net other income in 2003. The decrease was also due to increased salaries, wages and benefits and selling, general and administrative expenses.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 (In Thousands):

Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 increased $17,083, or 12.5%, to $153,468 from $136,385 in the comparable period in 2002. Marketing Services revenues increased $20,602, or 18.8%, to $130,396 primarily as a result of increased revenues associated with Burger King in the first half of 2003 and Kellogg’s programs throughout 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. The increase in Marketing Services revenues was also attributable to the inclusion of revenues generated by UPSHOT and SCI. The results for 2002 include UPSHOT from July 18, 2002 (acquired July 17, 2002) and exclude SCI (acquired September 3, 2003). Excluding the impact of the UPSHOT and SCI acquisitions, revenues increased 2.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. Consumer Product revenues decreased $3,519, or 13.2%, to $23,072 primarily as a result of decreased sales of Scooby-Doo™, Robot Wars® and Tub Tints® product partially offset by sales from the launch of a product line based on Disney’s Kim Possible and increased sales of Crayola® product. Revenues for Scooby-Doo™ product in 2002 were higher primarily due to increased shipments attributable to the Scooby-Doo™ feature film, which was released in the summer of 2002.

Cost of sales increased $12,701 to $112,566 (73.3% of revenues) for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 from $99,865 (73.3% of revenues) in the comparable period in 2002 due to the higher sales volume in 2003. The gross margin percentage increased to 26.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 from 25.5% in the comparable period for 2002. This increase is primarily the result of a charge for the forgiveness of a note receivable of $1,685 (1.2% of revenues) included in the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Excluding the impact for the forgiveness of the note receivable, gross margins decreased slightly primarily as a result of a decrease in margins for Burger King resulting from increased vendor costs, the provision of lower margin logistical services and general pricing pressures. This decrease was largely offset by higher margins for consumer products as a result of higher margin new product introductions and effective inventory management.

Salaries, wages and benefits increased $2,560, or 17.1%, to $17,539 (11.4% of revenues) for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 from $14,979 (11.0% of revenues) in the comparable period for 2002. This increase was primarily attributable to the addition of employees from the acquisitions of UPSHOT and SCI partially offset by a reduction in performance bonuses for employees in 2003.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $2,504, or 17.2%, to $17,056 (11.1% of revenues) for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 from $14,552 (10.6% of revenues) in the comparable period for 2002. The increase is primarily the result of additional operating expenses resulting from the acquisitions of UPSHOT and SCI, and increased selling expenses resulting from the higher sales level.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded integration costs of $219 (0.2% of revenues). These costs represent expenses directly related to the integration of UPSHOT such as travel, training and consulting.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $178 (0.1% of revenues). This restructuring charge represents severance for workforce reductions made during 2002 to combine and streamline the operations of the Company subsequent to the acquisition of UPSHOT.

22


Table of Contents

Net other income increased $304 to $495 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 from $191 in the comparable period for 2002. This increase was attributable to foreign exchange gains, partially offset by reduced net interest income attributable to a reduced level of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as a result of cash utilized for the acquisitions of UPSHOT and SCI.

The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was 34.7 % compared to 34.4% for the same period in 2002.

The cumulative effect of change in accounting principles in 2002 is due to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS 142 requires that companies no longer amortize goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets, such as trademarks. SFAS 142 also requires that companies evaluate goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets for impairment. As a result of this evaluation, the Company recorded a charge of $2,496, net of tax, in connection with the goodwill resulting from the 1998 acquisition of Contract Marketing, Inc. and U.S. Import and Promotions Co., collectively referred to as “USI.” The transition charge is reflected as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principles effective January 1, 2002, and therefore results for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 have been adjusted retroactively.

Net income increased $3,595 to $4,445 (2.9% of revenues) in 2003 from $850 (0.6% of revenues) in 2002. The increase was primarily due to the cumulative effect of change in accounting principles in 2002 of $2,496, net of tax, a charge for the forgiveness of a note receivable in 2002, the increase in gross profit earned on higher revenues in 2003 and the increase in net other income in 2003. The increase was partially offset by the increased salaries, wages and benefits and selling, general and administrative expenses in 2003.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

The Company’s financial position remained strong in the third quarter of 2003. At September 30, 2003, the Company had no debt and its cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $16,306, compared to $26,833 as of December 31, 2002. The decrease in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities was attributable to the acquisition of SCI on September 3, 2003 and payment of current liabilities partially offset by collection of accounts receivable during the first quarter of 2003.

As of September 30, 2003, the Company’s net accounts receivable decreased $12,714 to $31,103 from $43,817 at December 31, 2002. Accounts receivable as of December 31, 2002 were at higher than normal levels as a result of shipment delays attributable to the West Coast port dispute. This decrease was partially offset by additional receivables acquired as a result of the SCI acquisition. As of September 30, 2003, inventories increased $1,306 to $17,669 from $16,363 at December 31, 2002. This increase in inventories is primarily the result of the timing of Consumer Products expected to be delivered in the fourth quarter of 2003 in anticipation of the holiday shopping season, as well as the result of additional inventories related to SCI, partially offset by a decrease in Marketing Services inventories. Marketing Services inventories represent 68% and 87% of total inventories as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Promotional product inventory used in Marketing Services generally has lower risk than Consumer Product inventory, as it usually represents product made to order.

As of September 30, 2003, accounts payable decreased $11,002 to $27,332 from $38,334 at December 31, 2002. This decrease is associated with the payment of liabilities related to fourth quarter 2002 promotional programs. Accounts payable as of December 31, 2002 were at higher than normal levels as a result of shipment delays attributable to the West Coast port dispute. This decrease was partially offset by additional payables as a result of the SCI acquisition.

As of September 30, 2003, accrued liabilities decreased $9,339 to $14,990 from $24,329 at December 31, 2002. This decrease is primarily attributable to the payment of administrative fees collected from distribution companies during the fourth quarter of 2002 on behalf of promotional customers, employee performance bonuses and income taxes. This decrease was partially offset by additional accrued liabilities as a result of the SCI acquisition.

As of September 30, 2003, working capital was $28,460 compared to $29,157 at December 31, 2002. Cash flows used in operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were $2,834 compared to cash flows provided by operations of $5,952 in the prior year. This change is the result of the reduction of current assets and liabilities to more normalized levels as discussed above. Cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 increased $4,240 to $8,028 from $3,788 in the prior year. This increase is primarily the result of proceeds received in 2002 from sales of marketable securities which partially offset the payment for the purchase of UPSHOT, compared to the use of cash in 2003 to purchase SCI and to purchase marketable securities. Cash flows used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were $1,164 compared to $1,386 in the prior year. This decrease is the result of an increase in the proceeds from the exercise of stock options, partially offset by an increase in the

23


Table of Contents

repurchase of Company stock. As of the date hereof, the Company believes that its cash flows from operations, cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities at September 30, 2003 and its credit facility will be sufficient to fund its working capital needs for at least the next twelve months. The statements set forth herein are forward-looking and actual results may differ materially.

Credit Facilities

On April 24, 2001, the Company signed a credit facility (the “Facility”) with Bank of America. The Facility is secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets and provides for a line of credit of up to $35,000 for three years from the date of closing with borrowing availability determined by a formula based on qualified assets. Interest on outstanding borrowings will be based on either a fixed rate equivalent to LIBOR plus an applicable spread of between 1.50 and 2.25 percent or a variable rate equivalent to the bank’s reference rate plus an applicable spread of between zero and 0.50 percent. The Company is also required to pay an unused line fee of between zero and 0.60 percent per annum and certain letter of credit fees. The applicable spread is based on the achievement of certain financial ratios. The Facility also requires the Company to comply with certain restrictions and covenants as amended from time to time. On November 14, 2001, February 8, 2002, September 30, 2002 and November 14, 2003, certain covenants under the facility were amended. As of September 30, 2003, the Company was in compliance with the amended restrictions and covenants. The Facility may be used for working capital and acquisition financing purposes. As of September 30, 2003, there were no amounts outstanding under the Facility.

Acquisitions

On July 17, 2002, the Company consummated the acquisition of UPSHOT, a marketing agency with expertise in promotion, event, collaborative and environmental marketing. The Company financed the acquisition through its existing cash reserves. The acquisition was consummated pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 22, 2002, by and among the Company, Promotional Marketing, LLC (“Promotional Marketing”) and HA-LO Industries, Inc. (“HA-LO”) (the “Purchase Agreement”). Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired the principal assets of Promotional Marketing (consisting of the principal assets used in connection with the operation of the UPSHOT business) for $9,206 in cash plus related transaction costs of $685. This purchase price is net of $106 received in the fourth quarter of 2002 for a closing balance sheet working capital adjustment. The Company assumed the principal current liabilities of the UPSHOT business in connection with the acquisition. In addition to the cash purchase price paid at the closing, the Company may be obligated to pay additional consideration to Promotional Marketing contingent upon the results of certain performance targets attained in the twelve month period ending July 31, 2003. The additional consideration, if any, will be recorded as goodwill. Based on actual results through September 30, 2003, the Company does not expect to be obligated to pay any additional consideration. HA-LO, which is the parent company of Promotional Marketing, was in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings as of the acquisition date, and the Company’s acquisition of the UPSHOT business was approved by the United States bankruptcy court.

On September 3, 2003, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of SCI, a privately held promotional marketing services company based in Ontario, California. The Company financed the acquisition through its existing cash reserves. The acquisition was consummated pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated September 3, 2003, by and among the Company, SCI and Joseph J. Schmidt, III (the “Purchase Agreement”). Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of SCI for a cash purchase price of approximately $5.9 million (before closing balance sheet working capital adjustment), plus additional earnout consideration of up to $3.5 million based upon future performance of the acquired business. Net of a holdback of $250, the Company paid $5,683 in cash plus related transaction costs of $554. The Company also assumed the operating liabilities of the business in connection with the acquisition. The earnout consideration is based upon the business achieving targeted levels of earning before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) over the period from 2003 through 2006. The earnout payments, if required, are payable 50% in cash and 50% in shares of the Company’s common stock. The additional consideration, if any, will be recorded as goodwill.

24


Table of Contents

Stock Repurchase

On July 21, 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized up to $10,000 for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock over a twelve month period. In the period from July 21, 2000 to July 21, 2001, the Company spent $6,430 to purchase an aggregate of 523,594 shares at an average price of $12.28 per share including commissions. On July 24, 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10,000 for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock over a twelve month period. In the period from August 2, 2001 through July 11, 2002, the Company spent $5,605 to purchase 454,715 shares at an average price of $12.33 per share including commissions. On July 12, 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized up to an additional $10,000 for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock. The Company spent $2,316 to repurchase 177,400 shares at an average price of $13.05 per share including commissions under this authorization through September 30, 2003. The duration of the current buyback program is indefinite; provided, however, that the Company’s Board of Directors intends to review the program quarterly. Purchases are conducted in the open market at prevailing prices, based on market conditions when the Company is not in a quiet period. The Company may also transact purchases effected as block trades, as well as certain negotiated, off-exchange purchases not in the open market. Since initiating the overall buyback program on July 20, 2000, the Company has spent $14,351 to purchase a total of 1,155,709 shares at an average price of $12.42 per share including commissions through September 30, 2003. This repurchase program is being funded through working capital.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” SFAS No. 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which the obligation is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. SFAS No. 143 is effective for 2003. The Company implemented SFAS No. 143 on January 1, 2003. The impact of such adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” SFAS No. 145 requires that gains and losses from extinguishment of debt be classified as extraordinary items only if they meet the criteria in APB Opinion No. 30 (“Opinion No. 30”). Applying the provisions of Opinion No. 30 will distinguish transactions that are part of an entity’s recurring operations from those that are unusual and infrequent and meet the criteria for classification as an extraordinary item. SFAS No. 145 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2003. The Company implemented SFAS No. 145 on January 1, 2003. The impact of such adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which supercedes Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity.” SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit activity or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. EITF Issue No. 94-3 requires recognition of a liability at the date an entity commits to an exit plan. All provisions of SFAS No. 146 were effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 146, the Company’s previously issued financial statements will not be restated. The Company implemented SFAS No. 146 on January 1, 2003. The impact of such adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, a guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of an obligation assumed under a guarantee. FIN 45 also requires additional disclosures by a guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about the obligations associated with guarantees issued. The recognition provisions of FIN 45 are effective for any guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The Company implemented FIN 45 on January 1, 2003. The impact of such adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 will be the guidance that determines (1) whether consolidation is required under the “controlling financial interest” model of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (“ARB 51”), “Consolidated Financial Statements” or, alternatively, (2) whether the variable interest model under FIN 46 should be used to account for existing and new entities. The variable interest model of FIN 46 looks to identify the “primary beneficiary” of a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary is the party that is exposed to the majority of the risk or stands to benefit the most from the variable interest entity’s activities. A variable interest entity would be required to be consolidated if certain conditions are met. FIN 46 effective dates and transition provisions will be required for pre-existing entities as of the beginning of the first interim

25


Table of Contents

period beginning after December 15, 2003. Management does not believe that the adoption of this statement will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2003, SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” was issued. In general, this statement amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133. This statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In May 2003, SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” was issued, which requires that certain financial instruments must now be accounted for as liabilities. The financial instruments affected include mandatorily redeemable stock, certain financial instruments that require or may require the issuer to buy back some of its shares in exchange for cash or other assets and certain obligations that can be settled with shares of stock. SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and were applied to the Company’s existing financial instruments effective July 1, 2003, the beginning of the first fiscal period after June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 on July 1, 2003, did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or disclosures. The Company’s mandatory redeemable preferred stock does not have a fixed and determinable redemption date and, therefore, is not impacted by the adoption of SFAS No. 150.

In May 2003, the EITF reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 01-8, “Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease.” The new requirements of EITF No. 01-8 potentially affects companies that sell or purchase products or services through supply, commodity, transportation and data-processing outsourcing contracts. The guidance in this new release is designed to mandate reporting revenue as rental or leasing income that would otherwise be reported as part of product sales or services revenue. EITF No. 01-8 requires both parties to an arrangement to determine whether a service contract or similar arrangement includes a lease within the scope of SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” which means focusing on agreements conveying the right to use property, plant or equipment. The consensus is effective prospectively to arrangements agreed to, modified or acquired in business combinations in fiscal periods beginning after May 28, 2003 (the quarter beginning July 1, 2003 for the Company). The adoption of EITF No. 01-8 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Restructuring

During the third quarter of 2002, the Company formulated and implemented a restructuring plan in connection with the UPSHOT acquisition in order to combine and streamline the operations of the Company and UPSHOT. The Company evaluated the current cost structure of both businesses. In connection with this plan the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $178. This charge represents severance for a workforce reduction of seven employees in the Company’s Los Angeles office, who were terminated, and is reflected as a restructuring charge in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations. The workforce reduction included employees from the Company’s marketing services division as well as other support services. The full amount of the restructuring charge was paid as of September 30, 2003.

In connection with the restructuring plan, the Company also decided to close UPSHOT’s Richmond, Virginia office and eliminate certain positions at UPSHOT’s Chicago, Illinois office. Additionally, in 2003 the Company finalized its exit plan with respect to vacating half of its leased space (thirty thousand square feet) at UPSHOT’s Chicago, Illinois office. This resulted in an adjustment to the liabilities recorded and an increase to goodwill of $1,900 for the present value of the remaining lease payments for the vacated office space in excess of the estimated sub-lease income. The liabilities assumed in connection with this restructuring plan totaled $3,535 and are included as part of goodwill in accordance with EITF Issue No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.” $1,155 of these liabilities were paid as of September 30, 2003.

Related Party Transaction

On July 15, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with U.S. Capital Investors, Inc. (“USCI”), an entity controlled by Jeffrey S. Deutschman, pursuant to which USCI will serve as an advisor to the Company with respect to potential mergers and acquisitions through December 31, 2003. Mr. Deutschman currently serves on the Board of Directors of the Company as the representative of the holder of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock. The Company’s agreement with USCI provides for the payment of a discretionary success fee for completed acquisition transactions in an amount determined by an independent committee of the Board in accordance with certain guidelines and criteria. The guidelines for fees payable upon successful completion of an acquisition transaction are $200 for up to $10,000 of consideration, 1.5% of consideration from $10,000 to $25,000 and 1% of consideration over $25,000; provided, however, that the success fee for the first transaction under the agreement has an initial fee guideline of $275 for up to $10,000 of consideration. Notwithstanding the guidelines, the independent committee has absolute discretion in determining the amount, if any, of the success fee for any transaction. The USCI agreement provides for the payment of a refundable advance against success fees in the aggregate amount of $275. The USCI agreement was approved by the Board and acknowledged by the holder of the Series A Preferred Stock. The Company believes that this agreement will enhance its ability to analyze and close merger and acquisition transactions in a manner that is more cost effective than traditional outside advisory firms. In connection with the acquisition of SCI, USCI earned a success fee of $275. This success fee is recorded as a transaction cost of the SCI acquisition.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of it’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2003 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

26


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

  (a)   Exhibits
             
      31.1     Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
      32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  (b)   Reports on Form 8-K:
 
      Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2003 (Items 7 and 12).
 
      Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2003 (Items 2 and 7).

27


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
EQUITY MARKETING, INC.
     
Dated: November 14, 2003    
     
    /s/ Donald A. Kurz
   
    Donald A. Kurz,
    Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer

28