SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended March 29, 2003 | ||
[ ] | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number 0-21074
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
77-0158076 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
460 Ward Drive,
Santa Barbara, California 93111-2356
(Address of principal executive offices & zip code)
(805) 690-4500
(Registrants telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
As of May 1, 2003 there were 59,823,553 shares of the Registrants Common Stock outstanding.
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
Three Months Ended March 29, 2003
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||
ITEM 1 - Financial Statements |
||||||
Statement of Operations |
3 | |||||
Balance Sheet |
4 | |||||
Statement of Cash Flows |
5 | |||||
Notes to Unaudited Interim Financial Statements |
6 | |||||
ITEM 2 - Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
15 | |||||
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
22 | |||||
ITEM 4. Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
22 | |||||
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION |
||||||
ITEM 1 - Legal Proceedings |
23 | |||||
ITEM 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
||||||
(a) Exhibits |
23 | |||||
(b) Reports on Form 8-K |
26 | |||||
SIGNATURE |
27 |
- 2 -
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
March 30, 2002 | March 29, 2003 | |||||||||
Net revenues: |
||||||||||
Net commercial product revenues |
$ | 3,707,000 | $ | 5,121,000 | ||||||
Government and other contract
revenues |
909,000 | 2,450,000 | ||||||||
Sub license royalties |
| 9,000 | ||||||||
Total net revenues |
4,616,000 | 7,580,000 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||
Cost of commercial product revenues |
4,374,000 | 4,797,000 | ||||||||
Contract research and development |
651,000 | 1,385,000 | ||||||||
Other research and development |
1,306,000 | 1,711,000 | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
4,105,000 | 7,982,000 | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
10,436,000 | 15,875,000 | ||||||||
Loss from operations |
(5,820,000 | ) | (8,295,000 | ) | ||||||
Interest income |
65,000 | 67,000 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(24,000 | ) | (115,000 | ) | ||||||
Net loss |
(5,779,000 | ) | (8,343,000 | ) | ||||||
Less: |
||||||||||
Deemed distribution attributable
to the preferred stock
beneficial conversion feature |
(596,000 | ) | | |||||||
Net loss available to common
stockholders |
($ | 6,375,000 | ) | ($ | 8,343,000 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted loss per common share |
($ | 0.33 | ) | ($ | 0.14 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding |
19,427,091 | 59,823,553 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
- 3 -
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
December 31, | March 29, | |||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 18,191,000 | $ | 12,123,000 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
3,405,000 | 1,728,000 | ||||||||||
Inventory |
6,347,000 | 7,482,000 | ||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
555,000 | 484,000 | ||||||||||
Total current assets |
28,498,000 | 21,817,000 | ||||||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$12,648,000 and $13,201,000, respectively |
11,091,000 | 11,050,000 | ||||||||||
Patents, licenses and purchased technologies, net of accumulated
amortization of
$2,368,000 and $2,557,000, respectively |
5,141,000 | 5,087,000 | ||||||||||
Goodwill |
20,107,000 | 20,107,000 | ||||||||||
Other assets |
489,000 | 584,000 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 65,326,000 | $ | 58,645,000 | ||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 5,888,000 | $ | 8,537,000 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses |
4,557,000 | 3,942,000 | ||||||||||
Current portion of capitalized lease obligations and long term debt |
1,550,000 | 1,907,000 | ||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
11,995,000 | 14,386,000 | ||||||||||
Capitalized lease obligations and long term debt |
573,000 | 122,000 | ||||||||||
Other long term liabilities |
3,234,000 | 2,877,000 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities |
15,802,000 | 17,385,000 | ||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies-Note 7 |
||||||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||||||
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized,
None issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares
authorized, 59,823,553 shares issued and
outstanding |
60,000 | 60,000 | ||||||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
154,744,000 | 154,823,000 | ||||||||||
Notes receivable from stockholder |
(820,000 | ) | (820,000 | ) | ||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(104,460,000 | ) | (112,803,000 | ) | ||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
49,524,000 | 41,260,000 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 65,326,000 | $ | 58,645,000 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
- 4 -
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||
March 30, 2002 | March 29, 2003 | ||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|||||||||||
Net loss |
($ | 5,779,000 | ) | ($ | 8,343,000 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for
operating activities: |
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
425,000 | 745,000 | |||||||||
Warrant charges |
367,000 | | |||||||||
Amortization of accrued loss on sales contract |
(346,000 | ) | | ||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(1,134,000 | ) | 1,677,000 | ||||||||
Inventory |
(119,000 | ) | (1,135,000 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
203,000 | 149,000 | |||||||||
Patents and licenses |
(25,000 | ) | (134,000 | ) | |||||||
Other assets |
(50,000 | ) | (99,000 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
1,093,000 | 1,677,000 | |||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(5,365,000 | ) | (5,463,000 | ) | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(1,095,000 | ) | (512,000 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(1,095,000 | ) | (512,000 | ) | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|||||||||||
Payments on long-term obligations |
(66,000 | ) | (93,000 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock and warrants and
exercise of stock options |
12,460,000 | | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
12,394,000 | (93,000 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(5,934,000 | ) | (6,068,000 | ) | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
15,205,000 | 18,191,000 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 21,139,000 | $ | 12,123,000 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
- 5 -
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. General
Superconductor Technologies Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on May 11, 1987 and maintains its headquarters in Santa Barbara, California. The Company has operated in a single industry segment, the research, development, manufacture and marketing of high-performance filters to service providers and original equipment manufacturers in the mobile wireless communications industry. The Companys principal commercial product, the SuperFilter®, combines high-temperature superconductors with cryogenic cooling technology to produce a filter with significant advantages over conventional filters. From 1987 to 1997, the Company was engaged primarily in research and development and generated revenues primarily from government research contracts. The Company began full-scale commercial production of the SuperFilter® in 1997 and shipped 393 units in 2000, 438 in 2001 and 927 units in 2002.
The Company continues to be involved as either contractor or subcontractor on a number of contracts with the United States government. These contracts have been and continue to provide a significant source of revenues for the Company. For the quarters ended March 30, 2002 and March 29, 2003, government related contracts account for 20% and 32% respectively, of the Companys net revenues.
The unaudited consolidated financial information furnished herein has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management, are necessary to fairly state the Companys financial position, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the periods presented.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements. This quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. The results of operations for the three months ended March 29, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2003.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
During 2002 the Company incurred a net loss of $19,513,000 and negative cash flows from operations of $19,951,000. For the quarter ended March 29, 2003 the Company had a net loss of $8,343,000 and negative cash flows from operations of $5,463,000. The Company needs to significantly increase sales to achieve profitability and positive cash flows. If it is unable to do so, the Company may need additional debt or equity financing. The Companys financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The factors described above raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from this uncertainty.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Superconductor Technologies Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the Company). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated from the consolidated financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained with quality financial institutions and from time to time exceed FDIC limits.
Accounts Receivable
- 6 -
The Company sells predominantly to entities in the wireless communications industry and to entities of the United States Government. The Company grants uncollateralized credit to its customers. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers before granting credit.
Revenue Recognition
Commercial revenues are principally derived from the sale of the Companys SuperFilter® products and are recognized once all of the following conditions have been met: a) an authorized purchase order has been received in writing, b) customers credit worthiness has been established, c) shipment of the product has occurred, d) title has transferred, and e) if stipulated by the contract, customer acceptance has occurred and all significant vendor obligations, if any, have been satisfied.
Contract revenues are principally generated under research and development contracts. Contract revenues are recognized utilizing the percentage-of-completion method measured by the relationship of costs incurred to total estimated contract costs. If the current contract estimate were to indicate a loss, utilizing the funded amount of the contract, a provision would be made for the total anticipated loss. Revenues from research related activities are derived primarily from contracts with agencies of the United States Government. Credit risk related to accounts receivable arising from such contracts is considered minimal. These contracts include cost-plus, fixed price and cost sharing arrangements and are generally short-term in nature.
All payments to the Company for work performed on contracts with agencies of the U.S. Government are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. Based on historical experience and review of current projects in process, management believes that the audits will not have a significant effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Warranties
The Company recognizes the estimated cost of warranty expense at the time of revenue recognition. Warranty reserves are reviewed periodically and adjusted based on actual and anticipated experience.
Guarantees
In connection with the sales of its commercial products, the Company indemnifies, without limit or term, its customers against all claims, suits, demands, damages, liabilities, expenses, judgments, settlements and penalties arising from actual or alleged infringement or misappropriation of any intellectual property relating to its products or other claims arising from its products. The Company cannot reasonably develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of payments that might be made under its guarantee because of the uncertainty as to whether a claim might arise and how much it might total.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include salary, facility, depreciation and material expenses. Research and development costs incurred solely in connection with research and development contracts are charged to contract research and development expense. Other research and development costs are charged to other research and development expense.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with costs primarily determined using standard costs, which approximate actual costs utilizing the first-in, first-out method. Provision for potentially obsolete or slow moving inventory is made based on managements analysis of inventory levels and sales forecasts.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives ranging from three to five years. Leasehold improvements and assets financed under capital leases are amortized over the shorter of their useful lives or the lease term. Furniture and fixtures are depreciated over seven years. Expenditures for additions and major improvements are capitalized. Expenditures for minor tooling, repairs and maintenance and minor improvements are charged to expense as incurred. When property or equipment is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts. Gains or losses from
- 7 -
retirements and disposals are recorded as other income or expense.
Patents, Licenses and Purchased Technology
Patents and licenses are recorded at cost and are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or approximately seventeen years. Purchased technology acquired through the acquisition of Conductus, Inc. is recorded at its estimated fair value and is amortized using the straight-line method over seven years.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter after the annual planning process. The first step of the impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test shall be performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. The second step of the goodwill impairment test, used to measure the amount of impairment loss, compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
Long-Lived Assets
The realizability of long-lived assets is evaluated periodically as events or circumstances indicate a possible inability to recover the carrying amount. Such evaluation is based on various analyses, including cash flow and profitability projections. The analyses necessarily involve significant management judgment. In the event the projected undiscounted cash flows are less than net book value of the assets, the carrying value of the assets will be written down to their estimated fair value.
Loss Contingencies
In the normal course of business the Company is subject to claims and litigation, including allegations of patent infringement. Liabilities relating to these claims are recorded when it is determined that a loss is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The costs of defending the Company in such matters are expensed as incurred.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 (SFAS 109), Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS 109 utilizes an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, SFAS 109 generally considers all expected future events other than enactments of changes in the tax laws or rates. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Marketing Costs
All costs related to marketing and advertising the Companys products are expensed as incurred or at the time the advertising takes place. Advertising costs were not material in the periods ended March 30, 2002 and March 29, 2003.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in each year. Net loss available to common stockholders is computed after deducting accumulated dividends on cumulative preferred stock, deemed dividends and accretion of redemption value on redeemable preferred stock for the period and beneficial conversion features on issuance of convertible preferred stock. Common stock equivalents are not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share because their effect is antidilutive.
Stock-based Compensation
As permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees in accounting for its stock options and other stock-based employee awards. Pro forma information regarding net loss and loss per share, as calculated under the provisions of SFAS 123, are disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. The Company accounts for equity securities issued to non-employees in accordance with the provision
- 8 -
of SFAS 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force 96-18.
If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense for employee awards based upon the fair value at the grant date consistent with the methodology prescribed by SFAS 123, the Companys net loss and net loss per share would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
March 30, | March 29, | ||||||||
2002 | 2003 | ||||||||
Net Loss: |
|||||||||
As reported |
($ | 5,779,000 | ) | ($ | 8,343,000 | ) | |||
Pro forma |
($ | 6,868,000 | ) | ($ | 9,251,000 | ) | |||
Loss per Share: |
|||||||||
As reported |
($ | 0.33 | ) | ($ | 0.14 | ) | |||
Pro forma |
($ | 0.35 | ) | ($ | 0.15 | ) |
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The significant estimates in the preparation of the financial statements relate to the assessment of the carrying amount of accounts receivable, inventory, intangibles, estimated provisions for warranty costs, accruals for restructuring and lease abandonment costs in connection with the Conductus acquisition, income taxes, the loss contract with U.S. Cellular and disclosures related to the litigation with ISCO International, Inc. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to the financial statements.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The Company estimates that the carrying amount of the debt approximates fair value based on the Companys current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Comprehensive Income
The Company has no items of other comprehensive income in any period and consequently does not report comprehensive income.
Segment Information
The Company operates in a single business segment; the research, development, manufacture, marketing and sale of high temperature superconducting filters and low noise amplifiers and multiplexer products for the wireless communications industry. The Company also markets and sells a multi-carrier power amplifier, a related product manufactured by a third party. Net revenues derived principally from government research and development contracts are presented separately on the statement of operations for all periods presented. Management views its government research and development contracts as a supplementary source of revenue to fund its development of high temperature superconducting products.
Certain Risks and Uncertainties
Our two largest commercial customers accounted for 99% and 87% of our net commercial product revenues for the three months ended March 29, 2003 and March 30, 2002, respectively, and 12% and 43% of accounts receivable as of March 29, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
The Company currently purchases substrates for growth of high-temperature superconductor films from one supplier because of the quality of its substrates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
- 9 -
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This Statement addresses financial reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company does not believe it will have a material impact on its financial position or results of its operations.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an amendment of SFAS No. 123. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The amendments to Statement 123 in paragraphs 2(a)-2(e) of this Statement shall be effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. Earlier application of the transition provisions in paragraphs 2(a)-2(d) is permitted for entities with a fiscal year ending prior to December 15, 2002, provided that financial statements for the 2002 fiscal year have not been issued as of the date this Statement is issued. Early application of the disclosure provisions in paragraph 2(e) is encouraged. The amendment to Statement 123 in paragraph 2(f) of this Statement and the amendment to Opinion 28 in paragraph 3 shall be effective for financial reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The adoption of the Standard did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of its operations.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number 45, or FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (an interpretation of SFAS No. 5, 57 and 107 and rescission of FIN 34. FIN 45 clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, relating to a guarantors accounting for, and disclosure of, the issuance of certain types of guarantees. FIN 45 is effective on January 1, 2003 and did not have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the period ended March 29, 2003.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB 51. The primary objectives of FIN 46 are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (variable interest entities or VIEs) and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate the VIE (the primary beneficiary). This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (1) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest or (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entitys activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. FIN 46 is effective January 1, 2003 and did not have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the period ended March 29, 2003.
Note 3-Acquisition of Conductus, Inc.
On December 18, 2002, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Conductus, Inc. (Conductus). Conductus developed, manufactured, and marketed electronic components and systems based on superconductors for application in telecommunications markets and in defense, intelligence and law enforcement markets. The results of Conductus operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements for periods subsequent to the acquisition.
The following unaudited proforma information presents certain operating results as if the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2002:
Three Months | ||||
Ended March 30, | ||||
2002 | ||||
Revenue |
$ | 6,583,000 | ||
Net loss |
(9,633,000 | ) |
- 10 -
Three Months | ||||
Ended March 30, | ||||
2002 | ||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
(10,229,000 | ) | ||
Net loss per share |
$ | (0.31 | ) |
These proforma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and include certain adjustments such as additional amortization expense as a result of purchased technology and lower depreciation expense resulting from lower fixed assets costs. The proforma results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that actually would have resulted had the acquisition been in effect at January 1, 2002 or those of future periods.
4. Short Term Borrowings
On March 28, 2003, the Company entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement with a bank. The agreement provides for the sale of up to $5 million of eligible accounts receivable, with advances to the Company totaling 80% of the receivables sold. Advances bear interest at the prime rate (4.25% at March 29, 2003) plus 2.50% subject to a minimum monthly charge and the agreement terminates on April 1, 2004.
Advances under the agreement are collateralized by all the Companys assets. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company continues to service the sold receivables and is subject to recourse provisions. In connection with this agreement the Company issued seven year warrants for the purchase of 94,340 shares of common stock at $1.06 per share. The fair value of the warrants issued in connection with this agreement was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model utilizing a volatility factor of 115%, risk-free interest rate of 3.46% and expected life of 7 years. The value is accounted for as debt issuance costs and amortized over the term of the agreement.
5. Stockholders Equity
During the three months ended March 29, 2003, the Company (i) issued options to purchase 718,093 shares of common stock under the Companys stock option plans and (ii) cancelled options in connection with employment terminations to purchase 138,915 shares of common stock. No options were exercised during this period. At March 29, 2003, options to purchase 5,386,325 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding under the Companys stock option plans. The outstanding options expire by the end of March 2013. The exercise prices for these options range from $1.00 to $49.38 per share, for an aggregate exercise price of approximately $43 million. At March 29, 2003, there were 379,804 shares of common stock available for granting future options.
The following is a summary of outstanding warrants at March 29, 2003:
Number of Common | ||||||||||||||
Shares | ||||||||||||||
Currently | Price per | |||||||||||||
Total | Exercisable | Share | Expiration Date | |||||||||||
Warrant related to issuance of Series E preferred stock | 1,151,819 | 1,151,819 | $ | 19.53 | September 29, 2005 | |||||||||
Warrants related to issuance of common stock | 770,714 | 770,714 | 5.50 | March 10, 2007 | ||||||||||
5,274,240 | | 1.19 | December 17, 2007 | |||||||||||
Warrants related to bank borrowings | 62,500 | 62,500 | 3.00 | June 18, 2004 | ||||||||||
33,333 | 33,333 | 3.00 | December 1, 2004 | |||||||||||
27,692 | 27,692 | 3.25 | January 12, 2005 | |||||||||||
94,340 | 94,340 | 1.06 | March 28, 2010 | |||||||||||
Warrants related to sales agreements | 1,000,000 | 436,980 | 4.00 | August 27, 2004 |
- 11 -
Number of Common | ||||||||||||||
Shares | ||||||||||||||
Currently | Price per | |||||||||||||
Total | Exercisable | Share | Expiration Date | |||||||||||
Warrants assumed in connection with the Conductus, Inc. acquisition | 71,303 | 71,303 | 4.50 | September 1, 2003 | ||||||||||
219,690 | 219,690 | 6.667 | December 1, 2004 | |||||||||||
72,756 | 72,756 | 22.383 | August 1, 2005 | |||||||||||
1,095,000 | 1,095,000 | 4.583 | September 27, 2007 | |||||||||||
6,000 | 6,000 | 31.25 | September 1, 2007 |
6. Warrants Issued To U. S. Cellular
In August 1999, the Company entered into a warrant agreement with United States Cellular Corporation (U.S. Cellular) where the exercise of a warrant to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock was conditioned upon future product purchases by U.S. Cellular. Under the terms of the warrant, U.S. Cellular vests in the right to purchase one share of common stock at $4 per share for every $25 of SuperFilter systems purchased from the Company. The warrant is immediately exercisable with respect to any vested shares and expires August 27, 2004. For accounting purposes proceeds from sales to U.S. Cellular under this agreement were initially allocated between commercial product revenues and the estimated value of the warrants vesting in connection with those sales. The estimated fair value of the warrants in excess of the related sales, when applicable, is recorded in cost of commercial product revenues.
In September 2000, the Company received a $7.8 million non-cancelable purchase order from U.S. Cellular for SuperFilter systems to be shipped over the next nine quarters. In consideration for the purchase order, the Company amended the August 1999 warrant agreement and vested 312,000 warrants to U.S. Cellular. The vested warrants are immediately exercisable, not subject to forfeiture, and U.S. Cellular has no other obligations to the Company.
The estimated fair value of the warrants vesting upon receipt of this order was calculated to be $5,635,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and was recorded as a deferred warrant charge in the statement of stockholders equity. As SuperFilter systems are shipped under this purchase order, the related sales proceeds are allocated between stockholders equity and commercial product revenue using the percentage relationship which existed between the fair value of the warrants as recorded in September 2000 and the amount of the non-cancelable purchase order. The fair value of the warrants was calculated utilizing a volatility factor of 85%, risk-free interest rate of 6.01%, and an expected life of 3.92 years. During the three months ended March 30, 2002 sales proceeds of $367,000 for shipments pursuant to this purchase order were allocated to the deferred warrant charge and proceeds of $141,000 were recorded as commercial product revenues.
In September 2000, after the allocation of the future sales proceeds to the fair value of the related warrants, the estimated cost of providing products under the purchase order exceeded related revenue by $5.3 million. The resulting loss was reflected in the results of operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2000. During the three months ended March 30, 2002, $346,000 of this reserve was amortized against the cost of product delivered under this purchase order. Deliveries under this purchase order were completed during fiscal 2002.
As of March 29, 2003, U.S. Cellular has 563,020 unvested warrants that can be earned from future product orders through August 27, 2004. In each period in which these remaining warrants are earned, a non-cash charge will be recorded for the fair market value of the warrants shares earned or vested in the period.
7. Legal Proceedings
The Company is engaged in a patent dispute with ISCO International, Inc. relating to U.S. Patent No. 6,263,215 entitled Cryoelectronically Cooled Receiver Front End for Mobile Radio Systems. ISCO filed a complaint on July 17, 2001 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against us and our wholly owned subsidiary, Conductus, Inc. The ISCO complaint alleged that our SuperFilter product and Conductus ClearSite® product infringe ISCOs patent. The matter went to trial on March 17, 2003.
On April 3, 2003, the jury returned a unanimous verdict that our SuperFilter III product does not infringe, and that ISCOs patent is invalid and unenforceable. The jury also awarded the Company $3.8 million in compensatory damages
- 12 -
based upon a finding that ISCO engaged in unfair competition and acted in bad faith by issuing press releases and contacting our customers asserting rights under this patent. The award will only be recognized as income if and when received.
On April 17, 2003, the Company filed a Motion for Attorneys Fees and Disbursements, in which it asked the Court to award the Company its attorneys fees and other litigation expenses. On the same date, ISCO filed a motion, asking the Court to overturn the verdict and grant a new trial. Further briefing on both motions will be filed in early May 2003. It is not known when the Court will rule on either motion.
Litigation expenses on the ISCO matter totaled $4,034,000 for the three months ended March 29, 2003, and $818,000 in the three-month period ended March 30, 2002.
8. Earnings Per Share
The computation of per share amounts for the three months ended March 29, 2003 and March 30, 2002 is based on the average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Options and warrants to purchase 15,265,712 and 6,168,508 shares of common stock during the three months ended March 29, 2003 and March 30, 2002, respectively, were not considered in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would be antidilutive. Preferred stock convertible into 2,929,563 shares of common stock was also not considered in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 30, 2002 because their inclusion would also be antidilutive.
9. Details of Certain Financial Statement Components and Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information and Non-Cash Activities
Balance sheet data:
December 31, | |||||||||
2002 | March 29, 2003 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable: |
|||||||||
Accounts receivable-trade |
$ | 1,592,000 | $ | 586,000 | |||||
U.S. government accounts receivable-billed |
1,692,000 | 1,203,000 | |||||||
U.S. government accounts receivable-unbilled |
179,000 | | |||||||
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts |
(58,000 | ) | (61,000 | ) | |||||
$ | 3,405,000 | $ | 1,728,000 | ||||||
Unbilled accounts receivable represent costs and profits in excess of billed amounts on contracts-in-progress at year-end. Such amounts are billed based upon the terms of the contractual agreements. Such amounts are substantially collected within one year. |
Inventories: |
||||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 1,841,000 | $ | 1,283,000 | ||||||
Work-in-process |
3,143,000 | 4,248,000 | ||||||||
Finished goods |
2,013,000 | 2,685,000 | ||||||||
Less inventory reserve |
(650,000 | ) | (734,000 | ) | ||||||
$ | 6,347,000 | $ | 7,482,000 | |||||||
Property and Equipment: |
||||||||||
Equipment |
$ | 18,315,000 | $ | 18,772,000 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
5,016,000 | 5,063,000 | ||||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
408,000 | 416,000 | ||||||||
23,739,000 | 24,251,000 | |||||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(12,648,000 | ) | (13,201,000 | ) | ||||||
$ | 11,091,000 | $ | 11,050,000 | |||||||
- 13 -
At December 31, 2002 and March 29, 2003, equipment includes $1,448,000 of assets financed under capital lease arrangements, net of $1,090,000 and $1,132,000 of accumulated amortization, respectively. Depreciation expense amounted to $357,000 and $553,000 for the quarter ended March 30, 2002 and March 29, 2003, respectively. |
Patents and Licenses |
|||||||||
Patents pending |
$ | 599,000 | $ | 699,000 | |||||
Patents issued |
964,000 | 998,000 | |||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(268,000 | ) | (282,000 | ) | |||||
Net patents issued |
696,000 | 716,000 | |||||||
Licenses |
2,746,000 | 2,746,000 | |||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(2,081,000 | ) | (2,141,000 | ) | |||||
Net licenses |
665,000 | 605,000 | |||||||
Purchased technology |
3,200,000 | 3,200,000 | |||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(19,000 | ) | (133,000 | ) | |||||
Net purchased technology |
3,181,000 | 3,067,000 | |||||||
$ | 5,141,000 | $ | 5,087,000 | ||||||
Amortization expense related to these items totaled $68,000 and $189,000 the quarters ended March 30, 2002 and March 29, 2003, respectively and is expected to total $749,000 in 2003, $760,000 in 2004 and $774,000 in each of the years 2005, 2006 and 2007. |
Accrued Expenses and Other Long Term Liabilities |
|||||||||
Compensation related |
$ | 1,053,000 | $ | 1,586,000 | |||||
Warranty reserve |
351,000 | 369,000 | |||||||
Unfavorable lease costs |
1,140,000 | (1) | 1,065,000 | (1) | |||||
Lease abandonment costs |
1,995,000 | (1) | 1,843,000 | (1) | |||||
Product line exit costs |
1,042,000 | (1) | 1,010,000 | (1) | |||||
Severance costs |
1,600,000 | (1) | 535,000 | (1) | |||||
Other |
610,000 | 411,000 | |||||||
7,791,000 | 6,819,000 | ||||||||
Less current portion |
(4,557,000 | ) | (3,942,000 | ) | |||||
Long term portion |
$ | 3,234,000 | $ | 2,877,000 | |||||
(1) Amounts are related to the acquisition of Conductus, Inc. on December 18, 2002. |
Warranty Reserve Activity |
||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 242,000 | $ | 351,000 | ||||
Additions |
340,000 | 35,000 | ||||||
Deductions |
(231,000 | ) | (17,000 | ) | ||||
Ending balance |
$ | 351,000 | $ | 369,000 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities:
Equity issuance costs not yet paid |
$ | 203,000 | $ | | ||||
Issuance of warrants in connection with debt agreement |
$ | | $ | 78,000 | ||||
- 14 -
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
We develop, manufacture and market high performance wireless infrastructure products to commercial service providers, systems integrators and original equipment manufacturers as well as government entities. Our products, known commercially as SuperLink Solutions, maximize the performance of wireless networks by improving the quality of uplink signals from subscriber terminals (wireless handsets or mobile wireless devices) to network base stations and of downlink signals from network base stations to subscriber terminals. These premium products are built around our flagship product family, SuperLink Rx, and work in concert to provide Total Link Enhancement, combining the benefits of our complementary solutions to meet the growing demand of the wireless telecommunications industry for improved capacity, reduced interference, and greater coverage for their network base stations.
SuperLink Solutions consist of three unique product families: SuperLink Rx, SuperLink Tx and SuperPlex. Together, these solutions enable service providers to improve network performance while reducing capital and operating costs. Service providers also realize enhanced revenues as subscribes experience fewer dropped and blocked calls and better overall call quality.
| SuperLink Rx. In order to receive uplink signals from wireless terminals, base stations require a wireless filter system to eliminate, or filter out, out-of-band interference. To address this need, we offer SuperLink Rx. Deployed in base stations, these products combine specialized filters using high-temperature superconducting (HTS) technology with a proprietary cryogenic cooler and a low-noise amplifier. The result is the ultimate uplink, a highly compact and reliable cryogenic receiver front-end that can simultaneously deliver both high selectivity (interference rejection) and high sensitivity (detection of low level signals). SuperLink Rx products thereby offer significant advantages over conventional filter systems. | |
| SuperLink Tx. Wireless networks also suffer from insufficient transmit power on the downlink signal path. This is particularly true after the uplink has been improved by using SuperLink Rx. In this situation, operators can achieve superior downlink performance from SuperLink Tx, a family of compact, robust, and technologically advanced multi-carrier high-power amplifiers. | |
| SuperPlex. For antenna sharing without compromise, we offer SuperPlex, a line of multiplexers that provide extremely low insertion loss and excellent cross-band isolation. |
Our government products utilize many of the same advanced technologies as found in our SuperLink Rx products for commercial wireless networks. Government products are tailored to the specialized needs of individual government customers yet a significant percentage of these products are based on common platforms to allow for improved economies of scale.
| From 1987 to 1997, the Company was engaged primarily in research and development and generated revenues primarily from government research contracts. The Company began full-scale commercial production of the SuperLink Rx family of products in 1997 and shipped 438 units in 2001 and 927 units in 2002. As the Company continues to focus on its commercial products, commercial revenues are expected to increase as a percentage of revenues. The Company has incurred cumulative losses of $113 million from inception to March 29, 2003. |
On December 18, 2002, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Conductus, Inc. The results of Conductus, Inc. are included in the consolidated financial statement for periods following its acquisition.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts
- 15 -
of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, contingencies and restructuring reserves. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
Our net sales consist of revenue from sales of products net of trade discounts and allowances. We recognize revenue when evidence of an arrangement exists, contractual obligations have been satisfied, title and risk of loss have been transferred to the customer and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. At the time revenue is recognized, we provide for the estimated cost of product warranties if allowed for under contractual arrangements. Our warranty obligation is effected by product failure rates and service delivery costs incurred in correcting a product failure. Should such failure rates or costs differ from these estimates, accrued warranty costs would be adjusted.
In connection with the sales of its commercial products, the Company indemnifies, without limit or term, its customers against all claims, suits, demands, damages, liabilities, expenses, judgments, settlements and penalties arising from actual or alleged infringement or misappropriation of any intellectual property relating to its products or other claims arising from its products. The Company cannot reasonably develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of payments that might be made under its guarantee because of the uncertainty as to whether a claim might arise and how much it might total.
Contract revenues are principally generated under research and development contracts. Contract revenues are recognized utilizing the percentage-of-completion method measured by the relationship of costs incurred to total estimated contract costs. If the current contract estimate were to indicate a loss, utilizing the funded amount of the contract, a provision would be made for the total anticipated loss. Revenues from research related activities are derived primarily from contracts with agencies of the United States Government. Credit risk related to accounts receivable arising from such contracts is considered minimal. These contracts include cost-plus, fixed price and cost sharing arrangements and are generally short-term in nature.
All payments to the Company for work performed on contracts with agencies of the U.S. Government are subject to adjustment upon audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. Based on historical experience and review of current projects in process, management believes that the audits will not have a significant effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In connection with the acquisition of Conductus we recognized $20 million of goodwill. The first time this goodwill will be tested for impairment will be in the fourth quarter of 2003 unless required earlier. If the carrying amount exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss will be recognized equal to the excess.
As permitted under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS 123), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees in accounting for its stock options and other stock-based employee awards. Pro forma information regarding net loss and loss per share, as calculated under the provisions of SFAS 123, are disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. The Company accounts for equity securities issued to non-employees in accordance with the provision of SFAS 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force 96-18.
- 16 -
If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense for employee awards based upon the fair value at the grant date consistent with the methodology prescribed by SFAS 123, the Companys net loss and net loss per share would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
March 30, | March 29, | ||||||||
2002 | 2003 | ||||||||
Net Loss: |
|||||||||
As reported |
($ | 5,779,000 | ) | ($ | 8,343,000 | ) | |||
Pro forma |
($ | 6,868,000 | ) | ($ | 9,251,000 | ) | |||
Loss per Share: |
|||||||||
As reported |
($ | 0.33 | ) | ($ | 0.14 | ) | |||
Pro forma |
($ | 0.35 | ) | ($ | 0.15 | ) |
Our valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets is based on our assessments of historical losses and projected operating results in future periods. If and when we generate future taxable income in the U.S. against which these tax assets may be applied, some portion or all of the valuation allowance would be reversed and an increase in net income would consequently be reported in future years.
Backlog
Our commercial backlog consists of accepted product purchase orders scheduled for delivery within 24 months and consists of purchase orders for both dollar and unit purchase commitments. The exact dollar commitment for unit commitments may vary depending on the exact units purchased. Based on past purchasing patterns and expected purchasing trends of customers with unit commitments, we estimate our backlog at March 29, 2003 to be $4.5 million, as compared to $1.4 million at December 31, 2002.
Results of Operations
Quarter ended March 29, 2003 as compared to the quarter ended March 30, 2002.
On December 18, 2002, the Company acquired 100 percent of the outstanding shares of Conductus, Inc. Therefore, the results of Conductus, Inc. are included in the consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended March 29, 2003 and not in the quarter ended March 30, 2002.
Total net revenues increased by $3.0 million, or 64%, from $4.6 million for the quarter ended March 30, 2002 to $7.6 million for the quarter ended March 29, 2003. The increase is primarily due to higher commercial product revenues and higher contract sales.
Our commercial revenue is generated from (i) the sales of our SuperFilter product line which combines specialized superconducting RF filters with a proprietary cryogenic cooler (and, in most cases, a low noise amplifier) in highly compact systems and (ii) starting in February 2001, from the sales of our new multiplexer product line. Net commercial product revenue consists of gross commercial product sales proceeds less sales discounts and the allocation of certain sales proceeds to a warrant issued to one customer in 1999 under a long-term supply agreement. The following table summarizes the calculation of net commercial product revenue for 2003 and 2002:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||
March 30, | March 29, | |||||||||
Dollars in thousands | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||
Gross commercial product sales proceeds |
$ | 4,103 | $ | 5,178 | ||||||
Less allocation of proceeds to warrants issued to U.S. Cellular |
(367 | ) | | |||||||
Less sales discounts |
(29 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||
Net commercial product revenues |
$ | 3,707 | $ | 5,121 | ||||||
- 17 -
For the quarter ended March 29, 2003, net commercial product revenues increased to $5.1 million from $3.7 million in the same period last year, an increase of $1.4 million, or 38%. This increase is the result of higher sales of our SuperFilter products, a shift in the product mix toward higher-priced SIX-Pak units, increased sales of our duplexer product and the decrease in the amount of sales proceeds allocated to warrants partially offset by lower average selling prices. The increase in gross commercial product sales proceeds was partially offset by $367,000 in 2002 to reflect an allocation of sales proceeds to warrants issued to U.S. Cellular in connection with those sales. Our two largest customers accounted for 99% of our net commercial revenues in 2003 and 87% in 2002.
In 2003, government and other contract revenues totaled $2.5 million as compared to $909,000 in the same period last year, or an increase of $1.5 million. The increase is attributable the acquisition of Conductus.
Cost of commercial product revenue includes all direct costs, manufacturing overhead and related start-up costs. The cost of commercial product revenues totaled $4.8 million for the quarter ended March 29, 2003 as compared to $4.4 million in the same period last year.This increase resulted from increased unit shipments, higher costs associated with ramping up the Companys manufacturing capacity and amortization of the accrued loss relating to the U.S. Cellular contract in 2002, partially offset by lower material and labor costs per unit and the effect of increased manufacturing efficiencies. Cost of commercial product revenues for the quarter ended March 30, 2002 was reduced by amortization credits of $346,000 relating to the accrual for non-cash contract loss on the purchase order from U.S. Cellular. Excluding these amortization credits, the cost of commercial revenues for 2002 totaled $4.7 million
For the quarter ended March 29, 2003, we generated positive gross margins of $324,000 from net commercial sales of $5.1 million as compared to a negative gross margin of $667,000 for the quarter ended March 30, 2002. . Based on current prices and forecasted product mix and costs, we expect to continue to achieve positive commercial gross margins for the remainder of fiscal 2003.
Contract research and development expenses totaled $1.4 million in the quarter ended March 29, 2003 as compared to $651,000 in the prior year period. This increase results from the increased government and other contract activities resulting from the acquisition of Conductus.
Other research and development expenses relate to development of our commercial products. These expenses totaled $1.7 million in the quarter ended March 29, 2003 as compared to $1.3 million in the prior year. The increase results from increased commercial development efforts.
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $8.0 million in quarter ended March 29, 2003 as compared to $4.1 million in comparable period last year. This increase results primarily from increased domestic and international marketing and sales efforts, increased ISCO litigation expenses and the addition of Conductus expenses which totaled $385,000. ISCO litigation expenses totaled $4.0 million for 2003 as compared to $818,000 in 2002.
On April 3, 2003, the jury returned a unanimous verdict that ISCOs patent is invalid and unenforceable. The jury also awarded STI $3.8 million in compensatory damages based upon a finding that ISCO engaged in unfair competition and acted in bad faith by issuing press releases and contacting our customers asserting rights under this patent. The damages award will be recognized as income if and when received. Litigation expenses relating to this matter are expected to decrease significantly in the second quarter of 2003.
On April 17, 2003, the Company filed a Motion for Attorneys Fees and Disbursements, in which it asked the Court to award the Company its attorneys fees and other litigation expenses. On the same date, ISCO filed a motion, asking the Court to overturn the verdict and grant a new trial. Further briefing on both motions will be filed in early May 2003. It is not known when the Court will rule on either motion.
Interest income in the quarter ended March 29, 2003 is comparable to the prior year.
Interest expense in the current quarter in 2003 has increased as compared to the prior year due to interest being
- 18 -
recognized for accounting purposes due to certain liabilities being recorded at their net present value in connection with the Conductus acquisition.
We had a net loss of $8.3 million in the first quarter of 2003 as compared to $5.8 million in same period last year.
The net loss available to common shareholders totaled $8.3 million in the quarter ended March 29, 2003, or $0.14 per common share, as compared to $6.4 million, or $0.33 per common share in the same period last year. The amounts for 2002 include a $596,000 non-cash deemed distribution on preferred stock.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $6.1 million from $18.2 million at December 31, 2002 to $12.1 million at March 29, 2003.
Cash used in operations totaled $5.5 million in the first quarter of 2003. We used $7.6 million to fund the cash portion of our net losses. We also used cash to fund a $1.4 million increase in inventory, patents and licenses and other assets. Cash generated from the decrease in accounts receivable and increase in accounts payable and other accrued expenses totaled $3.5 million. Since a significant portion of our payables relate to the recently completed ISCO litigation we do not expect accounts payable and other accrued liabilities to increase at the same rate for the remainder of 2003.
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $512,000 in the first quarter of 2003 and primarily related to the purchase of manufacturing equipment and facilities improvements. .
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $93,000 in the first quarter of 2003 and related to the pay down of capital lease obligations.
On March 28, 2003, the Company entered into an accounts receivable purchase agreement with a bank. The agreement provides for the sale of up to $5 million of eligible accounts receivable, with advances to the Company totaling 80% of the receivables sold. Advances bear interest at the prime rate (4.25% at March 29, 2003) plus 2.50% subject to a minimum monthly charge and the agreement terminates April 1, 2004.
Advances under the agreement are collateralized by all the Companys assets. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company continues to service the sold receivables and is subject to recourse provisions. In connection with this agreement the Company issued seven year warrants for the purchase of 94,340 shares of common stock at $1.06 per share.
At March 29, 2003, we had the following cash commitments:
- 19 -
Payments Due | ||||||||||||||||||||
by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual | ||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations | Total | Less than 1 year | 2-3 years | 4-5 years | After 5 years | |||||||||||||||
Capital lease
obligations |
$ | 380,000 | $ | 239,000 | $ | 110,000 | $ | 31,000 | | |||||||||||
Principal and interest payments on subordinated note payable | 1,760,000 | 1,760,000 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases | 14,064,000 | 2,342,000 | 4,473,000 | 2,394,000 | $ | 4,855,000 | ||||||||||||||
Minimum license commitment | 587,000 | 100,000 | 200,000 | 200,000 | 87,000 | |||||||||||||||
Fixed asset purchase commitments | 841,000 | 841,000 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations | $ | 17,632,000 | $ | 5,282,000 | $ | 4,783,000 | $ | 2,625,000 | $ | 4,942,000 | ||||||||||
Additionally, we plan to invest an additional $2.0-$2.5 million in fixed assets during 2003 to continue to expand manufacturing ability. With our present SuperFilter product mix, we have the ability to manufacture about 600 units per quarter and have the ability to easily expand that capacity to 1,000 units per quarter. In addition, we expect that sales will continue to increase which will result in higher inventory and accounts receivable balances being maintained. Although revenues are expected to increase in 2003, through March 2003 the Company has continued to incur losses. Our long-term prospects are dependent upon the continued and increased market acceptance for our products.
Based on current forecasts, STI believes it will have sufficient resources to fund normal operations until it reaches profitability expected later this year. We need to significantly increase sales to achieve profitability and positive cash flows. If we are unable to do so, we may need additional debt or equity financing. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in existence.
Net Operating Loss Carryforward
At December 31, 2002, we had a federal net operating loss carryforward of approximately $162.7 million. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code imposes an annual limitation on the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards based on a statutory rate of return (usually the applicable federal funds rate, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code) and the value of the corporation at the time of a change of ownership as defined by Section 382. Recently the Company completed an analysis of its equity transactions and determined that it had a change in ownership in August 1999. Therefore, the ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards incurred prior to the change of ownership totaling $32.6 million will be subject in future periods to an annual limitation of $2.3 million. Net operating losses incurred by Superconductor Technologies Inc. subsequent to the change totaled $67.4 million and are not subject to this limitation, however, they may be subject to limitation should a subsequent change in ownership occur. Conductus has net operating loss carryforwards of $89.2 million. Conductus may have already had an ownership change because of its previous equity transactions. It is likely that the consummation of the merger with Conductus and the contemporaneous offering caused another ownership change for purposes of Section 382, further restricting utilization of net operating loss carryforwards incurred through the ownership change date and acquired through the acquisition of Conductus. If such an ownership change occurred, the applicable Section 382 Limitation may be significantly lower than the $2.3 million limitation that resulted from the 1999 ownership change.
- 20 -
Future Accounting Requirements
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This Statement addresses financial reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company does not believe it will have a material impact on its financial position or results of its operations.
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure-an amendment of SFAS No. 123. This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The amendments to Statement 123 in paragraphs 2(a)-2(e) of this Statement shall be effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. Earlier application of the transition provisions in paragraphs 2(a)-2(d) is permitted for entities with a fiscal year ending prior to December 15, 2002, provided that financial statements for the 2002 fiscal year have not been issued as of the date this Statement is issued. Early application of the disclosure provisions in paragraph 2(e) is encouraged. The amendment to Statement 123 in paragraph 2(f) of this Statement and the amendment to Opinion 28 in paragraph 3 shall be effective for financial reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The adoption of the Standard did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position or results of its operations.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation Number 45, or FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (an interpretation of SFAS No. 5, 57 and 107 and rescission of FIN 34. FIN 45 clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, relating to a guarantors accounting for, and disclosure of, the issuance of certain types of guarantees. FIN 45 is effective on January 1, 2003 and did not have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the periods ended March 29, 2003.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB 51. The primary objectives of FIN 46 are to provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (variable interest entities or VIEs) and how to determine when and which business enterprise should consolidate the VIE (the primary beneficiary). This new model for consolidation applies to an entity in which either (1) the equity investors (if any) do not have a controlling financial interest or (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entitys activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. FIN 46 is effective January 1, 2003 and did not have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the periods ended March 29, 2003.
- 21 -
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There was no material change in our exposure to market risk at March 29, 2003 as compared with our market risk exposure on December 31, 2002. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Risk in our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10K.
Item 4. Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company that is required to be included in the Companys periodic SEC filings. There were no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We have made these statements in reliance on the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Our forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future performance and include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our business strategy, future commercial revenues, market growth, capital requirements, new product introductions, expansion plans and the adequacy of our funding. Other statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are also forward-looking statements. We have tried, wherever possible, to identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, could, should, expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and other comparable terminology.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. They can be affected by many factors, including, but not limited to the following:
| fluctuations in product demand, | ||
| the impact of competitive filter products, technologies and pricing, | ||
| manufacturing capacity constraints and difficulties, | ||
| market acceptance risks, and | ||
| general economic conditions. |
Please read Exhibit 99 to our report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 entitled Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements for a description of additional uncertainties and factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on information presently available to senior management, and we do not assume any duty to update our forward-looking statements.
- 22 -
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are engaged in a patent dispute with ISCO International, Inc. relating to U.S. Patent No. 6,263,215 entitled Cryoelectronically Cooled Receiver Front End for Mobile Radio Systems. ISCO filed a complaint on July 17, 2001 in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against us and our wholly owned subsidiary, Conductus, Inc., another company involved in the high-temperature superconducting industry. The ISCO complaint alleged that our SuperFilter product and Conductus ClearSite® product infringe ISCOs patent. The matter went to trial on March 17, 2003.
On April 3, 2003, the jury returned a unanimous verdict that our SuperFilter III product does not infringe, and that ISCOs patent is invalid and unenforceable. The jury also awarded STI $3.8 million in compensatory damages based upon a finding that ISCO engaged in unfair competition and acted in bad faith by issuing press releases and contacting our customers asserting rights under this patent.
On April 17, 2003, the Company filed a Motion for Attorneys Fees and Disbursements, in which it asked the Court to award the Company its attorneys fees and other litigation expenses. On the same date, ISCO filed a motion, asking the Court to overturn the verdict and grant a new trial. Further briefing on both motions will be filed in early May 2003. It is not known when the Court will rule on either motion.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) |
Number | Description of Document | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (8) | |
3.2 | Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation (15) | |
3.3 | Bylaws of the Registrant (9) | |
3.4 | Certificate of Amendment of Bylaws dated May 17, 2001 (15) | |
3.5 | Certificate of Amendment of Bylaws dated August 8, 2001 (15) | |
4.1 | Form of Common Stock Certificate (1) | |
4.2 | Third Amended and Restated Stockholders Rights Agreement (9) | |
4.3 | Warrant Issued to PNC Bank, National Association in connection with Credit Agreement (9) | |
4.4 | Registration Rights Agreement to United States Cellular Corporation (10) | |
4.5 | Form of Warrant to United States Cellular Corporation (10) | |
4.6 | Warrant Purchase Agreement dated December 1, 1999 with PNC Bank (12) | |
4.7 | Warrant Purchase Agreement dated January 12, 2000 with PNC Bank (12) | |
4.8 | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series E Convertible Stock (13) | |
4.9 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of September 29, 2000 between the Company and RGC International Investors, LDC. (Exhibits and Schedules Omitted) (13) | |
4.10 | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 29, 2000 between the Company and RGC International Investors, LDC. (13) | |
4.11 | Initial Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of September 29, 2000 between the Company and RGC International Investors, LDC. (13) | |
4.12 | Incentive Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of September 29, 2000 between the Company and RGC International Investors, LDC. (13) | |
4.13 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 6, 2002 (16) | |
4.14 | Warrants to Purchase Shares of Common Stock, dated March 11, 2002 (16) | |
4.15 | Registration Rights Agreement dated October 10, 2002 (18) | |
4.16 | Warrants to Purchase Common Stock dated October 10, 2002 (18) |
- 23 -
Number | Description of Document | |
4.17 | Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 8, 2002 between Conductus, Inc. and the investors signatory thereto (7) | |
4.18 | Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated March 8, 2002 by Conductus, Inc. to certain investors (21) | |
4.19 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 26, 2002, between Conductus, Inc. and certain investors (21) | |
4.20 | Purchase Contract, dated as of August 7, 2000, between Conductus and Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. (22) * | |
4.21 | Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated August 7, 2000, issued by Conductus to Dobson Communications Corporation (22) * | |
4.22 | Form of Series B Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated September 11, 1998 and September 22, 1998 between Conductus and Series B Investors (23) | |
4.23 | Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock between Conductus and Series B investors, dated September 28, 1998, issued by Conductus in a private placement (23) | |
4.24 | Form of Series C Preferred Stock and Warrant Purchase Agreement, dated December 10, 1999, between Conductus and Series C Investors (24) | |
4.25 | Form of Warrant Purchase Common Stock between Conductus and Series C investors, dated December 10, 1999, issued by Conductus in a private placement (24) | |
4.26 | Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock dated March 28, 2003, 2003 issued to Silicon Valley Bank (25) | |
10.1 | Technical Information Exchange Agreement between the Registrant and Philips dated September 1989 (2) | |
10.2 | 1992 Director Option Plan (2) | |
10.3 | Form of Indemnification Agreement (2) | |
10.4 | License Agreement between the Registrant and the University of Arkansas dated April 9, 1992, as amended (2) | |
10.5 | 1992 Stock Option Plan (2) | |
10.6 | Proprietary Information & Patents Inventions Agreement among the Registrant, E-Systems, Inc. and various other parties; Purchase Order dated October 10, 1991(2) | |
10.7 | Joint Venture Company (JDC) Agreement between the Registrant and Sunpower Incorporated dated April 2, 1992 (2)* | |
10.8 | Government Contract issued to Registrant by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency through the Office of Naval Research dated September 4, 1991(2) | |
10.9 | License Agreement between the Registrant and E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company dated December 1992 (2) * | |
10.10 | Superconductor Technologies Inc. Purchase Agreement (3) * | |
10.11 | Form of Distribution Agreement (4) | |
10.12 | Amended and Restated 1988 Stock Option Plan, as amended, with form of stock option agreement (4) | |
10.13 | Joint Venture Agreement between Registrant and Analeptic Technologies (S) Pet Ltd., dated May 20, 1996 (5) * | |
10.14 | Employment Offer Letter to M. Peter Thomas dated April 3, 1997 (6) | |
10.15 | Employment Agreement with E. Ray Cotten dated July 1, 1997 (7) | |
10.16 | PNC Bank, National Association Credit Agreement (9) | |
10.17 | 1999 Stock Option Agreement (11) | |
10.18 | Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated January 12, 2000 between Registrant and PNC Bank (12) | |
10.19 | Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated March 29, 2000 between Registrant and PNC Bank (17) | |
10.20 | Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated December 21, 2000 between Registrant and PNC Bank (17) | |
10.21 | 1998 Stock Option Plan (14) | |
10.22 | Employment Agreement with M. Peter Thomas dated January 1, 2001 (15) | |
10.23 | Promissory Note with M. Peter Thomas dated April 9, 2001 (15) |
- 24 -
Number | Description of Document | |
10.24 | Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 6, 2002 (16) | |
10.25 | Agreement Concerning Additional Investors, dated March 8, 2002 (16) | |
10.26 | Letter Agreement dated September 29, 2002 between Superconductor and RGC International Investors, LPC (18) | |
10.27 | Subordinated Promissory Note dated September 30, 2002 issued to RGC International Investors, LPC (18) | |
10.28 | Form of Change in Control Agreement dated October 10, 2002 (20) | |
10.29 | Charles E. Shalvoy Change in Control Agreement dated October 10, 2002 (20) | |
10.30(a) | Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 20, 2002 (19) | |
10.30(b) | Supplement to Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 28, 2002 for additional investment (20) | |
10.31 | Promissory Note between Charles E. Shalvoy and Conductus dated December 28, 2000 (20) | |
10.32 | Security Agreement between Charles E. Shalvoy and Conductus dated December 28, 2000 (20) | |
10.33 | Promissory Note Agreement between Charles E. Shalvoy and Conductus dated August 21, 2001 (20) | |
10.34 | Security Agreement between Charles E. Shalvoy and Conductus dated August 21, 2000 (20) | |
10.35 | Purchase Contract, dated as of August 7, 2000, between Condutus and Dobson Cellular Systems, Inc. | |
10.36 | Form of Change of Control Agreement dated March 28, 2003(25) | |
10.37 | Accounts Receivable Purchases Agreement dated March 28, 2003 by and between Registrant and Silicon Valley Bank(25) | |
10.38 | Unconditional Guaranty dated March 27, 2003 issued by Conductus, Inc. to Silicon Valley Bank(25) | |
10.39 | Patent License Agreement between Telcordia Technologies, Inc. and Registrant dated July 13, 2002(25) | |
99.1 | Statement Pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
99.2 | Statement Pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(1) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Reg. No. 33-56714). |
|
(2) | Incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Registrants
Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Reg. No. 33-56714). |
|
(3) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Annual Report on Form
10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 1993. |
|
(4) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Annual Report on Form
10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 1994. |
|
(5) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-10569). |
|
(6) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Report on Form 10-Q filed
on May 8, 1997 for the quarter ended March 29, 1997. The exhibit listed
is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrants Report on
Form 10-Q. |
|
(7) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Annual Report on Form
10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 1997. |
|
(8) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed for the quarter ended April 3, 1999. |
|
(9) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed for the quarter ended July 3, 1999. |
|
(10) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q filed for the quarter ended October 2, 1999. |
|
(11) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-90293). |
|
(12) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December |
- 25 -
31, 1999. | ||
(13) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 4, 2000. | |
(14) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-56606). | |
(15) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended June 30, 2001. | |
(16) | Incorporated by reference from Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. | |
(17) | Incorporated by reference from Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. | |
(18) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 2, 2002. | |
(19) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 14, 2002. | |
(20) | Incorporated by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Reg. No. 333-100908). | |
(21) | Incorporated by reference from the Conductus, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-85928), filed on April 9, 2002. | |
(22) | Incorporated by reference from Conductus, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 14, 2000. | |
(22) | Incorporated by reference from Conductus, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 16, 1998. | |
(23) | Incorporated by reference from Conductus, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 30, 2000. | |
(24) | Incorporated by reference from Conductus, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 1999 filed with the SEC on March 30, 2000. | |
(25) | Filed herewith. |
* Confidential treatment has been previously granted for certain portions of these exhibits.
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K. |
We did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended March 29, 2003. We filed the following reports on Form 8-K subsequent to the quarter ended March 29, 2003 and prior to the date hereof:
| April 2, 2003 - Announcing fourth quarter and year-end 2002 results. | ||
| April 8, 2003 - Announcing that a jury returned a unanimous verdict that ISCO patent in invalid and unenforceable and awards Company $3.8 million compensatory damages. | ||
| April 10, 2003 - Announcing preliminary first quarter 2003 revenues. | ||
| April 30, 2003 - Announcing our first quarter 2003 results |
- 26 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES INC. | ||
Dated: May 13, 2003 | /s/ Martin S. McDermut | |
|
||
Martin S. McDermut | ||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
||
/s/ M. Peter Thomas | ||
|
||
M. Peter Thomas | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer |
- 27 -
Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings
I, M. Peter Thomas, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superconductor Technologies Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 13, 2003
/s/ M. Peter Thomas | |
M. Peter Thomas | |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
- 28 -
Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
By
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings
I, Martin S. McDermut, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superconductor Technologies Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; | ||
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and | ||
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and | ||
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and |
6. The registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 13, 2003
/s/ Martin S. McDermut | |
Martin S. McDermut | |
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
- 29 -