PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS CO INC - 10-Q Quarterly Report

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2005

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition period from ___________________ to ___________________

Commission file number 1-6196

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


North Carolina		56-0556998

(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)


1915 Rexford Road, Charlotte, North Carolina		28211

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (704) 364-3120

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at June 3, 2005

Common Stock, no par value		76,706,027

Page 1 of 32

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(In thousands)


	April 30,			October 31,
	2005			2004
ASSETS

Utility Plant, at original cost	$	2,536,195		$	2,474,796
Less accumulated depreciation		653,769			624,973

Utility plant, net		1,882,426			1,849,823

Other Physical Property (net of accumulated depreciation of $1,872 in 2005 and $1,782 in 2004)		776			973

Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		19,999			5,676
Restricted cash		12,879			12,732
Marketable securities, at market value		—			1,857
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,083 in 2005 and $1,086 in 2004)		141,477			70,987
Unbilled utility revenues		39,209			25,711
Gas in storage		74,612			128,465
Income taxes receivable		—			11,533
Amounts due from customers		33,371			34,716
Prepayments		2,305			38,709
Other		4,458			4,823

Total current assets		328,310			335,209


Investments, Deferred Charges and Other Assets:
Equity method investments in non-utility activities		64,506			65,322
Goodwill		48,152			48,151
Unamortized debt expense		5,041			5,261
Other		28,635			31,138

Total investments, deferred charges and other assets		146,334			149,872


Total	$	2,357,846		$	2,335,877


CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES

Capitalization:
Common stock equity:
Common stock, no par value, 100,000 shares authorized; outstanding, 76,786 in 2005 and 76,670 in 2004	$	565,567		$	563,667
Retained earnings		368,387			291,397
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(2,971	)		(166	)

Total common stock equity		930,983			854,898
Long-term debt		660,000			660,000

Total capitalization		1,590,983			1,514,898


Current Liabilities:
Notes payable		—			109,500
Accounts payable		112,401			99,599
Deferred income taxes		32,840			20,687
Income taxes accrued		18,231			306
General taxes accrued		7,681			17,097
Amounts due to customers		16,750			19,081
Accrued gas cost on unbilled utility revenues		4,619			2,479
Other		40,661			37,418

Total current liabilities		233,183			306,167


Deferred Credits and Other Liabilities:
Deferred income taxes		205,305			202,155
Unamortized federal investment tax credits		4,220			4,492
Asset retirement obligations		277,659			266,700
Other		46,496			41,465

Total deferred credits and other liabilities		533,680			514,812


Total	$	2,357,846		$	2,335,877

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
(In thousands)


	Three Months							Six Months							Twelve Months
	Ended							Ended							Ended
	April 30							April 30							April 30
	2005			2004				2005			2004				2005				2004
Operating Revenues	$	508,035		$	482,398			$	1,188,591		$	1,101,183			$	1,617,146			$	1,420,740
Cost of Gas		367,378			336,543				845,314			758,848				1,127,835				967,233


Margin		140,657			145,855				343,277			342,335				489,311				453,507


Operating Expenses:
Operations and maintenance		52,324			50,539				102,577			100,211				202,648				175,942
Depreciation		20,989			20,210				41,737			40,663				83,351				73,268
General taxes		7,332			7,421				15,773			13,423				29,361				25,085
Income taxes		19,098			21,781				63,357			64,785				49,984				53,065


Total operating expenses		99,743			99,951				223,444			219,082				365,344				327,360


Operating Income		40,914			45,904				119,833			123,253				123,967				126,147


Other Income (Expense):
Income from equity method investments		14,647			12,700				20,460			21,380				26,462				25,584
Gain on sale of equity method investments		—			(445	)			—			4,683				—				4,683
Gain on sale of marketable securities		1,525			—				1,525			—				1,525				—
Allowance for equity funds used during construction		359			344				616			648				1,092				1,242
Non-operating income		106			921				521			1,091				1,714				2,495
Charitable contributions		(184	)		(705	)			(252	)		(872	)			(8,504	)			(1,191	)
Non-operating expense		(49	)		(56	)			(85	)		(85	)			(324	)			(214	)
Income taxes		(6,387	)		(5,046	)			(8,704	)		(10,637	)			(8,702	)			(13,111	)


Total other income (expense), net of tax		10,017			7,713				14,081			16,208				13,263				19,488

Utility Interest Charges		11,201			12,324				23,006			23,535				47,012				43,523


Income Before Minority Interest in Income of Consolidated Subsidiary		39,730			41,293				110,908			115,926				90,218				102,112
Less Minority Interest in Income (Loss) of Consolidated Subsidiary		98			34				(1	)		45				1				865


Net Income	$	39,632		$	41,259			$	110,909		$	115,881			$	90,217			$	101,247


Average Shares of Common Stock:
Basic		76,703			76,163		*		76,706			72,158		*		76,621		*		69,586		*
Diluted		76,915			76,334		*		76,920			72,346		*		76,872		*		69,805		*

Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:
Basic	$	0.52		$	0.54		*	$	1.45		$	1.61		*	$	1.18		*	$	1.45		*
Diluted	$	0.52		$	0.54		*	$	1.44		$	1.60		*	$	1.17		*	$	1.45		*

Cash Dividends Per Share of Common Stock	$	0.23		$	0.215		*	$	0.445		$	0.4225		*	$	0.875		*		0.8375		*

Reflects a two-for-one stock split effective October 11, 2004.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(In thousands)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Twelve Months Ended
	April 30						April 30						April 30
	2005			2004			2005			2004			2005			2004
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$	39,632		$	41,259		$	110,909		$	115,881		$	90,217		$	101,247
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		22,301			21,426			44,365			43,094			88,606			76,877
Undistributed earnings from equity method investments		(14,647	)		(12,700	)		(20,460	)		(21,380	)		(26,462	)		(25,584	)
Gain on sale of equity method investments		—			445			—			(4,683	)		—			(4,683	)
Change in assets and liabilities		169,796			145,586			57,686			119,191			(52,926	)		55,271
Other, net		372			1,056			4,021			5,056			(5,858	)		431

Net cash provided by operating activities		217,454			197,072			196,521			257,159			93,577			203,559


Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Utility construction expenditures		(46,575	)		(32,866	)		(81,745	)		(60,551	)		(162,954	)		(103,995	)
Reimbursements from bond fund		7,532			10,303			19,283			16,173			44,607			19,935
Contributions to equity method investments		(50	)		—			(319	)		—			(433	)		—
Distributions from equity method investments		20,536			15,447			21,958			23,484			24,765			26,484
Proceeds from sale of equity method investments		—			—			—			36,096			—			36,096
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities		2,394			—			2,394			—			2,394			—
Proceeds from sale of non-utility plant		120			—			120			—			120			—
Purchase of NCNG and EasternNC, net of cash received in the twelve months ended April 30, 2004, of $7,185		—			(271	)		—			(271	)		—			(450,439	)
Other		13			1,619			(373	)		2,289			(703	)		1,472

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(16,030	)		(5,768	)		(38,682	)		17,220			(92,204	)		(470,447	)


Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Decrease in notes payable, net		(189,500	)		(123,000	)		(109,500	)		(109,500	)		—			—
Repayment of commercial paper		—			—			—			(445,559	)		—			—
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—			—			—			198,334			—			198,334
Debt offering costs		—			(241	)		—			(288	)		12			(539	)
Retirement of long-term debt		—			—			—			—			(2,000	)		(47,000	)
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of expenses		—			(266	)		—			173,828			—			173,828
Issuance of common stock through dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans		6,686			5,357			13,083			9,369			23,732			17,981
Repurchases of common stock		(6,455	)		—			(12,979	)		—			(17,466	)		—
Dividends paid		(17,631	)		(16,373	)		(34,120	)		(30,363	)		(67,024	)		(58,179	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(206,900	)		(134,523	)		(143,516	)		(204,179	)		(62,746	)		284,425


Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(5,476	)		56,781			14,323			70,200			(61,373	)		17,537
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period		25,475			24,591			5,676			11,172			81,372			63,835


Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	19,999		$	81,372		$	19,999		$	81,372		$	19,999		$	81,372


Noncash Investing and Financing Activities Related to Acquisitions of NCNG and EasternNC:
Fair value/book value of assets acquired				$	—					$	1,117			($3,811	)	$	512,252
Cash paid					(271	)					(271	)		—			(457,353	)
Adjustment of estimated working capital to actual					271						271			—			2,010

Liabilities assumed				$	—					$	1,117			($3,811	)	$	56,909

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
(In thousands)


	Three Months						Six Months						Twelve Months
	Ended April 30						Ended April 30						Ended April 30
	2005			2004			2005			2004			2005			2004
Net Income	$	39,632		$	41,259		$	110,909		$	115,881		$	90,217		$	101,247
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax:
Minimum pension liability adjustment		—			—			(2,748	)		—			(2,748	)		—
Reclassification adjustment of realized gain on marketable securities included in net income		(945	)		—			(945	)		—			(945	)		—
Unrealized income (loss) provided on marketable securities		—			—			348			—			945			—
Unrealized income (loss) provided from hedging activities of equity method investees		730			(346	)		2,229			(9	)		2,620			(891	)
Reclassification adjustment of realized (income) loss from hedging activities of equity method investees included in net income		(1,418	)		185			(1,689	)		705			(1,607	)		1,112

Total Comprehensive Income	$	37,999		$	41,098		$	108,104		$	116,577		$	88,482		$	101,468

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. The condensed consolidated financial statements have not been audited. These financial statements and other information included in this quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes included in our Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2004.

2. In our opinion, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of financial position at April 30, 2005 and October 31, 2004, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three, six and twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004. Our business is seasonal in nature. The results of operations for the three and six months ended April 30, 2005, do not necessarily reflect the results to be expected for the full year.

We make estimates and assumptions when preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from estimates.

3. We follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation” (Statement 71). Statement 71 provides that rate-regulated public utilities account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the economic effect of the manner in which independent third-party regulators establish rates. In applying Statement 71, we capitalize certain costs and benefits as regulatory assets and liabilities, respectively, pursuant to orders of the state regulatory commissions, either in general rate proceedings or expense deferral proceedings, in order to provide for recovery from or refund to utility customers in future periods. The amounts recorded as regulatory assets in the consolidated balance sheets as of April 30, 2005 and October 31, 2004, were $62.7 million and $65.1 million, respectively. The amounts recorded as regulatory liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets as of April 30, 2005 and October 31, 2004, were $306.5 million and $297.6 million, respectively.

4. All of our goodwill is attributable to the regulated utility segment. The balance in goodwill as of October 31, 2004 and April 30, 2005, and the changes for the six months ended April 30, 2005, are presented below.


In thousands
Balance as of October 31, 2004	$	48,151
Minority interest in loss of Eastern North Carolina Natural Gas Company (EasternNC)		1

Balance as of April 30, 2005	$	48,152

5. Components of the net periodic benefit cost for our defined-benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plan for the three months, six months and twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, are presented below. All amounts reflect the impact of the acquisition of North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation (NCNG) effective as of the close of business on September 30, 2003.


	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
In thousands	2005			2004			2005			2004
Three Months Ended April 30
Service cost	$	2,691		$	2,349		$	348		$	341
Interest cost		3,166			3,021			538			663
Expected return on plan assets		(4,065	)		(3,997	)		(258	)		(231	)
Amortization of transition obligation		—			—			220			220
Amortization of prior-service cost		233			233			321			258
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss		47			—			—			95

Net periodic benefit cost	$	2,072		$	1,606		$	1,169		$	1,346


Six Months Ended April 30
Service cost	$	5,383		$	4,831		$	696		$	682
Interest cost		6,333			6,042			1,076			1,325
Expected return on plan assets		(8,130	)		(7,993	)		(515	)		(461	)
Amortization of transition obligation		—			—			439			440
Amortization of prior-service cost		465			465			642			515
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss		93			—			—			191

Net periodic benefit cost	$	4,144		$	3,345		$	2,338		$	2,692


Twelve Months Ended April 30
Service cost	$	10,250		$	7,861		$	1,351		$	1,127
Interest cost		12,375			11,165			2,297			2,448
Expected return on plan assets		(16,357	)		(14,713	)		(976	)		(870	)
Amortization of transition obligation		—			6			879			879
Amortization of prior-service cost		931			931			1,158			1,030
Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss		93			(420	)		89			290

Net periodic benefit cost	$	7,292		$	4,830		$	4,798		$	4,904

6. We compute basic earnings per share using the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during each period. A reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three, six and twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, is presented below. All shares and per share amounts reflect a two-for-one stock split effective October 11, 2004.


	Three Months				Six Months				Twelve Months
In thousands except per share amounts	2005		2004		2005		2004		2005		2004
Net Income	$	39,632	$	41,259	$	110,909	$	115,881	$	90,217	$	101,247


Average shares of Common Stock outstanding for basic earnings per share		76,703		76,163		76,706		72,158		76,621		69,586
Contingently issuable shares under the Long-Term Incentive Plan		212		171		214		188		251		219

Average shares of dilutive stock		76,915		76,334		76,920		72,346		76,872		69,805


	Three Months				Six Months				Twelve Months
In thousands except per share amounts	2005		2004		2005		2004		2005		2004
Earnings Per Share of Common Stock:
Basic	$	.52	$	.54	$	1.45	$	1.61	$	1.18	$	1.45
Diluted	$	.52	$	.54	$	1.44	$	1.60	$	1.17	$	1.45

7. We have two reportable business segments, regulated utility and non-utility activities. These segments are identified based on products and services, regulatory environments and our corporate organization and business decision-making activities. Our regulated utility segment operations are conducted by the parent company and by EasternNC. Our non-utility activities segment operations are comprised of our equity method investments in joint ventures.

Operations of the regulated utility segment are reflected in operating income in the condensed consolidated statements of income. Operations of the non-utility activities segment are included in the “Other Income (Expense)” section of the condensed consolidated statements of income in “Income from equity method investments” and “Non-operating income.”

We evaluate the performance of the regulated utility segment based on margin, operations and maintenance expenses and operating income. We evaluate the performance of the non-utility activities segment based on earnings from the ventures and the return on our investments in the ventures. The basis of segmentation and the basis of the measurement of segment profit or loss are the same as reported in the consolidated financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2004.

Operations by segment for the three, six and twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, are presented below.


	Regulated				Non-utility
	Utility				Activities						Total
In thousands	2005		2004		2005			2004			2005		2004
Three Months Ended April 30
Revenues from external customers	$	508,034	$	482,398	$	—		$	—		$	508,034	$	482,398
Margin		140,657		145,855		—			—			140,657		145,855
Operations and maintenance expenses		52,324		50,539		124			33			52,448		50,572
Operating income (loss)		60,012		67,685		(124	)		(31	)		59,888		67,654
Income from equity method investments		—		—		14,647			12,700			14,647		12,700
Income before income taxes and minority interest		49,232		55,526		15,983			12,594			65,215		68,120
Equity method investments in non-utility activities		—		—		64,506			62,588			64,506		62,588

Six Months Ended April 30
Revenues from external customers	$	1,188,591	$	1,101,183	$	—		$	—		$	1,188,591	$	1,101,183
Margin		343,277		342,335		—			—			343,277		342,335
Operations and maintenance expenses		102,577		100,211		156			86			102,733		100,297
Operating income (loss)		183,190		188,038		(258	)		(97	)		182,932		187,941


	Regulated				Non-utility
	Utility				Activities						Total
In thousands	2005		2004		2005			2004			2005		2004
Income from equity method investments		—		—		20,460			21,380			20,460		21,380
Income before income taxes and minority interest		161,379		165,057		21,590			26,291			182,969		191,348
Equity method investments in non-utility activities		—		—		64,506			62,588			64,506		62,588

Twelve Months Ended April 30
Revenues from external customers	$	1,617,146	$	1,420,740	$	—		$	—		$	1,617,146	$	1,420,740
Margin		489,311		453,507		—			—			489,311		453,507
Operations and maintenance expenses		202,648		175,942		242			114			202,890		176,056
Operating income (loss)		173,951		179,212		(395	)		(180	)		173,556		179,032
Income from equity method investments		—		—		26,462			25,584			26,462		25,584
Income before income taxes and minority interest		121,366		137,971		27,538			30,317			148,904		168,288
Equity method investments in non-utility activities		—		—		64,506			62,588			64,506		62,588

Reconciliations to the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three, six and twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, are presented below.


	Three Months						Six Months						Twelve Months
In thousands	2005			2004			2005			2004			2005			2004
Operating Income:
Segment operating income	$	59,888		$	67,654		$	182,932		$	187,941		$	173,556		$	179,032
Utility income taxes		(19,098	)		(21,781	)		(63,357	)		(64,785	)		(49,984	)		(53,065	)
Non-utility activities		124			31			258			97			395			180

Operating income	$	40,914		$	45,904		$	119,833		$	123,253		$	123,967		$	126,147


Net Income:
Income before income taxes and minority interest for reportable segments	$	65,215		$	68,120		$	182,969		$	191,348		$	148,904		$	168,288
Income taxes		(25,485	)		(26,827	)		(72,061	)		(75,422	)		(58,686	)		(66,176	)
Less minority interest income (loss)		98			34			(1	)		45			1			865

Net income	$	39,632		$	41,259		$	110,909		$	115,881		$	90,217		$	101,247

8. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of wholly owned subsidiaries whose investments in joint venture, energy-related businesses are accounted for under the equity method. Our ownership interest in each business is recorded in “Equity method investments in non-utility activities” in the consolidated balance sheets. Earnings or losses from equity method investments are recorded in “Income from equity method investments” in “Other Income (Expense)” in the consolidated statements of income.

As of April 30, 2005, the amount of retained earnings that represented undistributed earnings of equity method

investments was $22.6 million.

Cardinal Pipeline Company, L.L.C.

We own 21.48% of the membership interests in Cardinal Pipeline Company, L.L.C., a North Carolina limited liability company. Cardinal owns and operates an intrastate natural gas pipeline in North Carolina and is regulated by the North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC).

We have related party transactions with Cardinal as a transportation customer and we record in cost of gas the transportation costs charged by Cardinal. These gas costs for the three months, six months and twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, are presented below.


	Three Months				Six Months				Twelve Months
In thousands	2005		2004		2005		2004		2005		2004
Transportation Costs	$	1,142	$	1,159	$	2,323	$	2,339	$	4,684	$	3,316

As of April 30, 2005 and 2004, we owed Cardinal $.4 million.

Summarized financial information provided to us by Cardinal for 100% of Cardinal as of and for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, is presented below.


	Three Months				Six Months
In thousands	2005		2004		2005		2004
Revenues	$	3,828	$	3,870	$	7,741	$	7,783
Gross profit		3,828		3,870		7,741		7,783
Income before income taxes		2,023		2,013		4,043		4,086
Total assets		96,742		100,913		96,742		100,913

Pine Needle LNG Company, L.L.C.

We own 40.0587% of the membership interests in Pine Needle LNG Company, L.L.C., a North Carolina limited liability company. Pine Needle owns an interstate liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage facility in North Carolina and is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

We have related party transactions with Pine Needle as a customer and we record in cost of gas the storage costs charged by Pine Needle. These gas costs for the three months, six months and twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, are presented below.


	Three Months				Six Months				Twelve Months
In thousands	2005		2004		2005		2004		2005		2004
Storage Costs	$	3,011	$	3,001	$	6,114	$	6,070	$	12,314	$	11,392

As of April 30, 2005 and 2004, we owed Pine Needle $1 million.

Summarized financial information provided to us by Pine Needle for 100% of Pine Needle as of and for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, is presented below.


	Three Months				Six Months
In thousands	2005		2004		2005		2004
Revenues	$	4,790	$	4,613	$	9,792	$	9,524
Gross profit		4,790		4,613		9,792		9,524
Income before income taxes		2,163		2,258		4,593		4,638
Total assets		107,213		108,279		107,213		108,279

SouthStar Energy Services LLC

We own 30% of the membership interests in SouthStar Energy Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Under the terms of an amended and restated LLC operating agreement effective January 1, 2004, earnings and losses are allocated 25% to us and 75% to the other member. SouthStar sells natural gas to residential, commercial and industrial customers in the southeastern United States; however, SouthStar conducts most of its business in the unregulated retail gas market in Georgia.

We have related party transactions with SouthStar which purchases wholesale gas supplies from us. Our operating revenues from these sales for the three months, six months and twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, are presented below.


	Three Months				Six Months				Twelve Months
In thousands	2005		2004		2005		2004		2005		2004
Operating Revenues	$	2,485	$	146	$	6,009	$	146	$	8,530	$	146

As of April 30, 2005 and 2004, SouthStar owed us $.7 million and $.1 million, respectively.

Summarized financial information provided to us by SouthStar for 100% of SouthStar as of and for the three months and six months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, is provided below.


	Three Months				Six Months
In thousands	2005		2004		2005		2004
Revenues	$	314,165	$	306,992	$	558,550	$	514,403
Gross profit		66,399		56,629		101,245		82,154
Income before income taxes		53,696		43,824		71,156		59,260
Total assets		192,777		161,301		192,777		161,301

9. We purchase natural gas for our regulated operations for resale under tariffs approved by the state regulatory commissions having jurisdiction over the service area where the customer is located. We recover the cost of gas purchased for regulated operations through purchased gas cost recovery mechanisms. We structure the pricing, quantity and term provisions of our gas supply contracts to maximize flexibility and minimize cost and risk for our customers. We have a management-level Energy Risk Management Committee that monitors risks in accordance with our risk management policies.

We have purchased and sold financial options for natural gas in all three states for our gas purchase portfolios. There is no income statement impact from the North Carolina and South Carolina hedging plans as all costs and related gain or loss amounts are passed through to customers under purchase gas adjustment (PGA) procedures and are recorded in amounts due to/from customers. In South Carolina, the cost of the options is pre-approved for recovery from customers by the Public Service Commission of South Carolina (PSCSC),

subject to our following the provisions of the gas cost hedging plan approved by the PSCSC. In North Carolina, costs associated with our North Carolina hedging program are not pre-approved for recovery from customers by the NCUC but are treated as gas costs subject to the annual gas cost prudence review by the NCUC. In Tennessee, the cost of the options and all other gas costs incurred are components of and are recovered under the guidelines of the Tennessee Incentive Plan approved by the Tennessee Regulatory Authority (TRA).

10. In connection with the sale in January 2004 of our propane interests, we received 37,244 common units of Energy Transfer Partners, LP, which were recorded at market value in “Marketable securities” in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. We sold these units in February 2005 for total proceeds of $2.4 million. We recorded an after-tax gain of $.9 million from the sale of the units in the three months ended April 30, 2005.

11. Prepayments decreased from $38.7 million at October 31, 2004, to $2.3 million at April 30, 2005, primarily due to the reclassification of $35.1 million of prepaid gas costs to gas in storage on November 1, 2004. Under asset management agreements, prepaid gas costs during the summer months represent purchases of gas that is not available for sale, and therefore not recorded in inventory, until November 1, the beginning of the winter period.

12. Notes payable decreased from $109.5 million at October 31, 2004, to zero at April 30, 2005, as cash flows during the period resulted in no outstanding borrowings under our short-term lines of credit as of April 30, 2005.

13. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets” (Statement 153). The provisions of Statement 153 are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges that occur in our fiscal quarter beginning August 1, 2005. We believe the adoption of Statement 153 will not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (Statement 123R). Statement 123R requires entities to adopt the fair value method of accounting for stock-based plans. The fair value method would require the amortization of the fair value of stock-based compensation as determined at the date of grant over the related vesting period. Under Statement 123R, most employee stock purchase plans that offer a discount of greater than 5% will be considered compensatory. Statement 123R is effective for us in our fiscal quarter beginning November 1, 2005. We intend to amend our employee stock purchase plan to lower the discount rate from 10% to 5%.

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” (FIN 47) to clarify the term “conditional asset retirement” as used in SFAS 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” FIN 47 requires that a liability be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred, if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Uncertainty about the timing or method of settlement of a conditional asset retirement obligation would be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. This interpretation is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. Accordingly, we will adopt FIN 47 no later than our fourth fiscal quarter in 2006. We are currently assessing the impact FIN 47 may have on our balance sheet; however, we believe the adoption will not have a material impact on our results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (Statement 154), a replacement of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 20 and SFAS No. 3. Statement 154 applies

to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and changes the requirements for accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of the change in accounting principle is required unless it is impracticable. Statement 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with earlier application permitted in fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005.

14. On May 12, 2005, we sold our corporate office building located in Charlotte, North Carolina, for $6.9 million. In connection with the sale, we paid a real estate commission of $226,000 to a commercial real estate company affiliated with a member of our Board of Directors. Under the terms of the agreement, the purchaser agreed to lease back the building to us until our new office space that is currently under construction is ready for occupancy. In accordance with utility plant accounting, gains or losses on dispositions of land are recorded in the income statement and gains or losses on buildings and other tangible property are recorded in accumulated depreciation in the balance sheet. Depending upon the results of the sales price allocation, we may record a gain on the sale of the land; however, we do not expect that any recorded gain will be material to our results of operations.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Piedmont Natural Gas Company is an energy services company primarily engaged in the distribution of natural gas to residential, commercial and industrial customers in portions of North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. We also have equity method investments in joint venture, energy-related businesses. Our operations are comprised of two business segments.

The regulated utility segment is the largest segment of our business with approximately 97% of our consolidated assets. This segment is regulated by three state regulatory commissions that approve rates and tariffs that are designed to give us the opportunity to generate revenues to cover our gas costs and fixed and variable non-gas costs and to earn a fair rate of return for our shareholders. Factors critical to the success of the regulated utility include a safe, dependable natural gas distribution system and the ability to recover the costs and expenses of the business in rates charged to customers.

The non-utility activities segment consists of our equity method investments in joint venture, energy — related businesses that are involved in unregulated retail natural gas marketing, interstate natural gas storage and intrastate natural gas transportation. We invest in joint ventures that are aligned with our business strategies to complement or supplement income from utility operations. We continually monitor performance and rates of return of these ventures against expectations.

Weather conditions directly influence the volumes of natural gas delivered by the regulated utility. Significant portions of our revenues are generated during the winter season. During warm winters or unevenly cold winters, heating customers may not use their gas furnaces at all or may significantly reduce their consumption of natural gas. Although we have weather normalization adjustment mechanisms (WNA) that are designed to protect a portion of revenues against warmer-than-normal weather, deviations from normal weather can affect our financial performance and liquidity. The WNA also serves to offset the impact of colder-than-normal weather by reducing the amounts we can charge our customers.

In the past few years, there have been significant increases in the price of natural gas. The relationship between supply and demand has the greatest impact upon price. Although we believe there are sufficient

supplies of natural gas to meet our customers’ needs, price increases, if continued, could shift our customers’ preference away from natural gas and toward a competing energy source, particularly in the industrial market. Price increases could also affect the consumption levels of our customers or make it more difficult for them to pay their bills. We continue to advocate the need for an effective national energy policy. We expect that the wholesale price of natural gas will remain high and volatile until there is a national policy that will allow a balancing of natural gas supply and demand. Access to domestic supplies that are unavailable due to governmental restrictions could help alleviate the supply/demand imbalance for natural gas in the United States, and help restore wholesale prices to more reasonable, competitive levels.

Although we have been operating in a relatively low interest rate environment in the past few years for both short- and long-term debt financing, a rise in interest rates without the recognition of the higher cost of debt in our rates charged to customers could negatively affect earnings. The level of short-term borrowings can vary significantly due to changes in the wholesale prices of natural gas that could subject us to short-term interest rate risks.

Part of our strategic plan is to effectively manage our gas distribution operations through innovative rate and regulatory initiatives, with a continued focus on controlling operating costs and implementing new technologies to achieve this end. We are working to enhance the value and growth of our utility assets by good management of capital spending, both for improvements for current customers and the pursuit of customer growth opportunities in our service areas. We strive for excellent customer service by investing in systems, processes and people. We will continue to work with our state regulators for rate stability and to maintain fair rates of return in a balance of the interests of our customers and shareholders.

Our strategic plan includes a focus on maintaining a debt-to-capitalization ratio within a range of 45 to 50 % to maintain a strong balance sheet and allow us access to the capital markets. We will continue to stress the importance of maintaining strong, investment-grade credit ratings to support our operating and investment needs. We continuously monitor our level of short-term borrowings to secure short-term bank lines that meet our short-term operating needs.

Results of Operations

We will discuss the results of operations for the three months, six months and twelve months ended April 30, 2005, compared with similar periods in 2004. Operating results for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004 and the twelve months ended April 30, 2005, reflect the full effect of the acquisitions of NCNG and an equity interest in EasternNC on September 30, 2003.

Our regulatory commissions approve rates and tariffs that are designed to give us the opportunity to generate revenues to cover our gas costs and fixed and variable non-gas costs and to earn a fair rate of return for our shareholders. We have a WNA in all three states that partially offsets the impact of unusually cold or warm weather on bills rendered in November through March for weather-sensitive customers. In North Carolina and Tennessee, adjustments are made directly to the customer’s bill. In South Carolina, the adjustments are calculated at the individual customer level and recorded in a deferred account (regulatory asset or liability) for subsequent collection from or refund to all customers in the class. The WNA formula calculates the actual weather variance from normal, using 30 years of history, which results in an increase in revenues when weather is warmer than normal and a decrease in revenues when weather is colder than normal. The gas cost portion of our costs is recoverable through PGA procedures and is not affected by the WNA.

Operating Revenues

Operating revenues were $508 million and $482.4 million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and

2004, respectively. Operating revenues in 2005 increased $25.6 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following increases.

• $26.5 million from increased commodity gas costs passed through to customers.

• $9.9 million from an increase in volumes delivered of 1.5 million dekatherms.

These increases were partially offset by the following decreases.

• $4.2 million from the WNA due to credits to customers of $6.9 million in 2005 compared with credits of $2.8 million in 2004. Weather for the three months ended April 30, 2005, was 2% colder than normal, compared with 4% colder than normal for the same period in 2004.

• $2.8 million from secondary market transactions. Secondary market transactions are off-system sales and capacity release arrangements.

Operating revenues were $1,188.6 million and $1,101.2 million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Operating revenues in 2005 increased $87.4 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following increases.

•   $75.9 million from increased commodity gas costs passed through to customers.

•   $7.4 million from the WNA due to surcharges to customers of $7.2 million in 2005 compared with credits of $.2 million in 2004. Weather for the six months ended April 30, 2005, was 5% warmer than normal, compared with 1% colder than normal for the same period in 2004.

•   $6.4 million from secondary market transactions.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $1.5 million due to a decrease in volumes delivered of .2 million dekatherms.

Operating revenues were $1,617.1 million and $1,420.7 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Operating revenues in 2005 increased $196.4 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following increases.

•   $102 million from NCNG and EasternNC, which included twelve months activity for 2005 and only seven months activity for 2004. Of this increase, $81 million was from an increase in volumes delivered of 28.6 million dekatherms and $17.2 million was from non-volumetric billings, such as facilities charges, reconnect fees and late payment fees.

•   $49.7 million from secondary market transactions.

•   $46.5 million from increased commodity gas costs passed through to customers.

•   $8.7 million from the WNA due to surcharges to customers of $10.9 million in 2005 compared with surcharges of $2.2 million in 2004, excluding NCNG activity. Weather for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005, was 9% warmer than normal, compared with normal weather for the same period in 2004.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $11.3 million due to a decrease in sales volumes of 1.7 million dekatherms, excluding NCNG and EasternNC activity.

Cost of Gas

Cost of gas was $367.4 million and $336.5 million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Cost of gas in 2005 increased $30.9 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following increases.

• $26.5 million from increased commodity gas costs.

• $7.2 million due to an increase in volumes delivered of 1.5 million dekatherms.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $2.9 million from secondary market transactions.

Cost of gas was $845.3 million and $758.8 million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Cost of gas in 2005 increased $86.5 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following increases.

• $75.9 million from increased commodity gas costs.

• $6.8 million from secondary market transactions.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $1.1 million due to a decrease in volumes delivered of .2 million dekatherms.

Cost of gas was $1,127.8 million and $967.2 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Cost of gas in 2005 increased $160.6 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following increases.

•   $67.7 million from NCNG and EasternNC, which included twelve months activity for 2005 and only seven months activity for 2004.

•   $51 million from secondary market transactions.

•   $46.5 million from increased commodity gas costs.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $8.2 million due to a decrease in volumes delivered of 1.7 million dekatherms, excluding NCNG and EasternNC activity.

Under PGA procedures in all three states, we revise rates periodically without formal rate proceedings to reflect changes in the wholesale cost of gas. Charges to cost of gas are based on the amount recoverable under approved rate schedules. The net of any over- or under-recoveries of gas costs are added to or deducted from cost of gas and included in “Amounts due from customers” or “Amounts due to customers” in the consolidated balance sheets.

In North Carolina and South Carolina, recoveries of gas costs are subject to annual gas cost recovery proceedings to determine the prudence of our gas purchases. We have been found prudent in all such past proceedings.

Margin

Margin was $140.7 million and $145.9 million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Margin in 2005 decreased $5.2 million compared with the similar prior period primarily resulting from decreased consumption in the residential, commercial and industrial customer classes because of warmer weather and continued customer conservation due to increased commodity gas costs. The decrease was partially offset by increases in margin from growth in our residential and commercial customer base.

Margin was $343.3 million and $342.3 million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Margin in 2005 increased $1 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to increases in margin from growth in our residential and commercial customer base. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in margin resulting from decreased consumption in the residential, commercial and

industrial customer classes because of warmer weather and continued customer conservation.

Margin was $489.3 million and $453.5 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Margin in 2005 increased $35.8 million compared with the similar prior period. Margin increased $34.3 million from NCNG and EasternNC operations, which included twelve months activity in 2005 and only seven months activity in 2004. Margin increased from growth in our residential and commercial customer base, partially offset by decreased consumption in the residential, commercial and industrial customer classes because of warmer weather and continued customer conservation.

Operations and Maintenance Expenses

Operations and maintenance expenses were $52.3 million and $50.5 million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Operations and maintenance expenses in 2005 increased $1.8 million compared with the similar prior period due to the following increases.

•   $1.2 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued vacation pay liability resulting in part to increased vacation benefits effective January 1, 2005.

•   $.6 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued long-term incentive plan liability to reflect an additional award effective November 1, 2004.

•   $.5 million in employee benefits expense primarily due to pension and health insurance costs.

•   $.4 million in outside labor primarily due to costs of data-center sourcing.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the provision for uncollectibles of $.9 million, primarily due to improved collection results, including recoveries of previously written off accounts.

Operations and maintenance expenses were $102.6 million and $100.2 million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Operations and maintenance expenses in 2005 increased $2.4 million compared with the similar prior period due to the following increases.

•   $1.1 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued vacation pay liability resulting in part to increased vacation benefits effective January 1, 2005.

•   $1.3 million in employee benefits expense primarily due to pension and health insurance costs.

•   $.7 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued long-term incentive plan liability to reflect an additional award effective November 1, 2004.

•   $.7 million in utilities primarily due to increased long distance telephone service and data costs.

•   $.5 million in outside labor primarily due to costs of data-center sourcing.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the provision for uncollectibles of $1.6 million, primarily due to improved collection results, including recoveries of previously written off accounts.

Operations and maintenance expenses were $202.6 million and $175.9 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Operations and maintenance expenses in 2005 increased $26.7 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following increases.

• $11.4 million in payroll costs primarily due to accruals for the long-term and short-term incentive plans, merit pay increases and the addition of NCNG employees for twelve months in the 2005 period compared with only seven months in the 2004 period.

• $4 million in other corporate expenses primarily due to amortization of NCNG integration costs and the deferral in 2003 to a regulatory asset of EasternNC’s operations and maintenance costs that had been expensed prior to September 30, 2003.

•   $2.9 million in outside labor primarily due to NCNG operations and to costs of data-center sourcing.

•   $2.8 million in employee benefits expense primarily due to pension and postretirement health care and life insurance costs.

•   $2.4 million due to accrual of the projected benefit obligation for the Board of Director’s retirement plan.

•   $2.1 million in consulting fees primarily due to legal fees, accounting and auditing fees, business process improvement programs, the pipeline integrity management program and the integrated mapping project.

•   $1.6 million in utilities primarily due to increased long distance telephone service and data costs.

•   $1.3 million in transportation expenses primarily due to NCNG operations.

•   $.7 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued vacation pay liability resulting in part to increased vacation benefits effective January 1, 2005.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the provision for uncollectibles of $4.7 million, primarily due to improved collection results, including recoveries of previously written off accounts.

Depreciation

Depreciation expense was $21 million and $20.2 million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, $41.7 million and $40.7 million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $83.4 million and $73.3 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Depreciation expense for the current periods increased over similar prior periods primarily due to increases in plant in service, including a full twelve months of depreciation expense on plant acquired from NCNG for the 2005 period compared with only seven months for the similar 2004 period. Due to the continued growth in our service areas and the related capital expansion, we anticipate that depreciation expense will continue to increase.

General Taxes

General taxes were $7.3 million and $7.4 million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

General taxes were $15.8 million and $13.4 million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. General taxes in 2005 increased $2.4 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following increases.

• $1.8 million in Tennessee property taxes as the expense in 2004 reflected the impact of a favorable court ruling that reduced assessed property values and the estimated tax accruals for prior periods.

• $.3 million in payroll taxes.

General taxes were $29.4 million and $25.1 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. General taxes increased $4.3 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following increases.

•   $1.6 million in property taxes from NCNG operations.

•   $1.8 million in Tennessee property taxes discussed above.

•   $.8 million in payroll taxes.

Other Income (Expense)

Income from equity method investments was $14.6 million and $12.7 million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Income from equity method investments increased $1.9 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to an increase in income from SouthStar of $2.5 million.

Income from equity method investments was $20.5 million and $21.4 million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Income from equity method investments decreased $.9 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the absence of earnings from propane in 2005 due to the sale of our propane interests in January 2004, partially offset by an increase in income from SouthStar of $1.3 million.

Income from equity method investments was $26.5 million and $25.6 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Income from equity method investments in 2005 increased $.9 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to increases in earnings from SouthStar of $.8 million and Pine Needle of $.3 million.

The gain (loss) on sale of equity method investments resulted from the sale of our propane interests in January 2004. In the quarter ended April 30, 2004, we adjusted the estimated gain of $5.1 million recorded in the first quarter by $.4 million to reflect actual data becoming available.

The gain on sale of marketable securities resulted from the sale in February 2005 of 37,244 common units of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P., which we acquired in connection with the sale of our propane interests in January 2004. Total proceeds from the sale were $2.4 million and resulted in a before-tax gain of $1.5 million.

The equity portion of the allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) for the three months ended April 30, 2005, increased slightly, and for the six months and twelve months ended April 30, 2005, decreased slightly compared with similar prior periods. AFUDC is allocated between equity and debt based on actual amounts computed and the ratio of construction work in progress to average short-term borrowings.

Non-operating income is comprised of non-regulated merchandising and service work, subsidiary operations, interest income and other miscellaneous income. Non-operating income and fluctuations in non-operating income are not significant.

Charitable contributions for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005, increased $7.3 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the initial funding of $7 million to the Piedmont Natural Gas Foundation established in October 2004.

Utility Interest Charges

Utility interest charges were $11.2 million and $12.3 million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Utility interest charges in 2005 decreased $1.1 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following.

• $1 million decrease in interest on amounts due to/from customers due to higher average net receivables in the current period compared with average net payables in the similar prior period.

• $.3 million decrease due to an increase in AFUDC allocated to debt.

• $.3 million increase in interest on short-term debt primarily due to higher amounts of debt outstanding at higher interest rates.

Utility interest charges were $23 million and $23.5 million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Utility interest charges in 2005 decreased $.5 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following.

•   $1.5 million decrease in interest on amounts due to/from customers due to higher average net receivables in the current period compared with the similar prior period.

•   $.9 million decrease in interest on short-term debt due to the repayment of the commercial paper program in December 2003 that we utilized to temporarily finance the NCNG acquisition.

•   $.4 million decrease due to an increase in AFUDC allocated to debt.

•   $1.2 million increase in interest on long-term debt due to higher balances outstanding as a result of the permanent financing of the NCNG acquisition.

•   $.7 million increase in interest on short-term debt due to higher amounts of debt outstanding at higher interest rates.

Utility interest charges were $47 million and $43.5 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Utility interest charges in 2005 increased $3.5 million compared with the similar prior period primarily due to the following.

•   $5.9 million increase in interest on long-term debt due to higher balances outstanding, including amounts due to the permanent financing of the NCNG acquisition.

•   $.8 million increase in interest on short-term debt due to higher amounts of debt outstanding at higher interest rates.

•   $.8 million increase in interest in connection with the Internal Revenue Service audit of our federal income tax return for the year ended October 31, 2001.

•   $2.1 million decrease in interest on amounts due to/from customers due to significantly higher average net receivables in 2005 compared with average net payables in 2004.

•   $1.9 million decrease in interest on short-term debt due to the repayment of commercial paper in December 2003 that we utilized to temporarily finance the NCNG acquisition.

•   $.7 million decrease due to an increase in AFUDC allocated to debt.

Our Business

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., which began operations in 1951, is an energy services company primarily engaged in the distribution of natural gas to 960,000 residential, commercial and industrial customers in portions of North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee, including 60,000 customers served by municipalities who are our wholesale customers. We are invested in joint venture, energy-related businesses, including unregulated retail natural gas marketing, interstate natural gas storage, intrastate natural gas transportation and regulated natural gas distribution. We also sell residential and commercial gas appliances in Tennessee.

Effective at the close of business on September 30, 2003, we purchased 100% of the common stock of NCNG from Progress Energy, Inc. (Progress), for $417.5 million in cash plus $32.4 million for estimated working capital. We paid an additional $.3 million for actual working capital in our second quarter ended April 30, 2004. At the time of the acquisition, NCNG, a regulated natural gas distribution company, served 176,000 customers in eastern North Carolina, including 57,000 customers served by four municipalities who were wholesale customers of NCNG. NCNG was merged into Piedmont immediately following the closing.

We also purchased for $7.5 million in cash Progress’ equity interest in EasternNC. EasternNC is a regulated utility that was granted, in 2000, a certificate of public convenience and necessity by the NCUC to provide natural gas service to 14 counties in eastern North Carolina that previously were not served with natural gas. Progress’ equity interest in EasternNC consisted of 50% of EasternNC’s outstanding common stock and 100% of EasternNC’s outstanding preferred stock. We have agreed to invest an additional $14.4 million in the project in return for up to an additional 326 shares of authorized but unissued preferred stock.

We have two reportable business segments, regulated utility and non-utility activities. For further information on business segments, see Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements.

Our utility operations are regulated by the NCUC, the PSCSC and the TRA as to rates, service area, adequacy of service, safety standards, extensions and abandonment of facilities, accounting and depreciation. We are also regulated by the NCUC as to the issuance of securities. We are also subject to or affected by various federal regulations. These federal regulations include regulations that are particular to the natural gas industry, such as regulations of the FERC that affect the availability of and the prices paid for the interstate transportation of natural gas, regulations of the Department of Transportation that affect the construction, operation, maintenance, integrity and safety of natural gas distribution systems and regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the use and release into the environment of hazardous wastes. In addition, we are subject to numerous regulations, such as those relating to employment practices, that are generally applicable to companies doing business in the United States of America.

In the Carolinas, our service area is comprised of numerous cities, towns and communities including Anderson, Greenville and Spartanburg in South Carolina and Charlotte, Salisbury, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, High Point, Burlington, Hickory, Spruce Pine, Reidsville, Fayetteville, New Bern, Wilmington, Tarboro, Elizabeth City, Rockingham and Goldsboro in North Carolina. In North Carolina, we also provide wholesale natural gas service to Greenville, Monroe, Rocky Mount and Wilson. In Tennessee, our service area is the metropolitan area of Nashville, including wholesale natural gas service to Gallatin and Smyrna.

We continually assess the nature of our business and explore alternatives to traditional utility regulation. Non-traditional ratemaking initiatives and market-based pricing of products and services provide additional challenges and opportunities for us. For further information, see “Results of Operations” above and Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

We invest in joint ventures to complement or supplement income from utility operations. If an opportunity aligns with our overall business strategies, we analyze and evaluate the project with a major factor being a projected rate of return greater than the returns allowed in our utility operations, due to the higher risk of such projects. We make only those investments that are approved by our Board of Directors. We participate in the governance of the venture by having a management representative on the governing board of the venture. We monitor actual performance and rates of return against expectations and make periodic reports to the Board. Decisions regarding exiting joint ventures are based on many factors, including performance results and continued alignment with our business strategies.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

We believe we have access to adequate resources to meet our needs for working capital, construction expenditures, debt redemptions and dividend payments over the next 12 months. These resources include net cash flows from operating activities, access to capital markets, cash generated from our investments in joint ventures and bank lines of credit.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities. The natural gas business is seasonal in nature. Operating cash flows may fluctuate significantly during the year and from year to year due to such factors as weather, natural gas prices, collections from customers, natural gas purchases and gas inventory storage activity. We rely on operating cash flows and short-term bank borrowings to meet seasonal working capital needs. During our first and second quarters, we generally have positive cash flows from the sale of flowing gas and gas in storage and the collection of amounts billed to customers. This cash is used to reduce short-term debt to zero during much of our second and third quarters. Most of our annual earnings are realized in the winter period, which is the

first five months of our fiscal year. Cash requirements generally increase during our third and fourth quarters due to increases in natural gas purchases for storage and decreases in receipts from customers.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $217.5 million and $197.1 million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, $196.5 million and $257.2 for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $93.6 million and $203.6 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The primary factor that impacts our cash flows from operations is weather. Warmer weather can lead to lower total margin from fewer volumes of natural gas sold or transported. Colder weather can increase volumes sold to weather-sensitive customers, but may lead to conservation by customers in order to reduce their consumption. Temperatures above normal can lead to reduced operating cash flows, thereby increasing the need for short-term borrowings to meet current cash requirements. For the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, 83% of our total sales and transportation revenues were from residential and commercial customers. For the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, 84% and 85%, respectively, of our total sales and transportation revenues were from residential and commercial customers. For the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, 80% and 83%, respectively, of our total sales and transportation revenues were from residential and commercial customers. Volumes of natural gas sold to both residential and commercial customers are weather-sensitive.

The financial condition of the natural gas marketers and pipelines that supply and deliver natural gas to our distribution system can increase our exposure to supply and price fluctuations. We believe our risk exposure to the financial condition of the marketers and pipelines is minimal based on our receipt of the products and services prior to payment and the availability of other marketers of natural gas to meet our supply needs if necessary.

The regulated utility faces competition in the residential and commercial customer markets based on customer preferences for natural gas compared with other energy products, such as electricity and propane, and the relative prices of those products. The most significant product competition is with electricity for space heating, water heating and cooking. Increases in the price of natural gas can negatively impact our competitive position by decreasing the price benefits of natural gas to the consumer. This can impact our cash needs if customer growth slows, resulting in reduced capital expenditures, or if customers conserve, resulting in reduced gas purchases and customer billings.

In the industrial market, many of our customers have the capability of burning a fuel other than natural gas, fuel oil being the most significant competing energy alternative. Our ability to maintain industrial market share is largely dependent on price. The relationship between supply and demand has the greatest impact on the price of natural gas. With the imbalance between domestic supply and demand, the cost of natural gas from non-domestic sources may play a greater role in establishing the future market price of natural gas. The price of oil depends upon a number of factors beyond our control, including the relationship between supply and demand and the policies of foreign and domestic governments. Our liquidity could be impacted, either positively or negatively, as a result of alternate fuel decisions made by industrial customers.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities. Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities was $(16) million and $(5.8) million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, $(38.7) million and $17.2 million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $(92.2) million and $(470.4) million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The net cash used in investing activities for the three and twelve months ended April 30, 2005, and the three months ended April 30, 2004, was primarily for utility construction expenditures. Net cash used in investing activities for the twelve months ended April 30, 2004, was primarily for the acquisitions of NCNG and EasternNC. As expenditures are made in EasternNC’s service territory, reimbursement requests are made to the State of North Carolina under orders issued by the NCUC granting EasternNC a total of $188.3 million of bond funds. Such funds are available to

pay for the uneconomic portion of the construction of a natural gas distribution infrastructure in the eastern part of the state. For further information about the bond fund, see “Gas Supply and Regulatory Proceedings” below.

We have a substantial capital expansion program for construction of distribution facilities, purchase of equipment and other general improvements. This program primarily supports the growth in our customer base. We have budgeted $157.4 million for utility construction expenditures for fiscal 2005. Due to projected growth in our service areas, significant utility construction expenditures are expected to continue and are a part of our long-range forecast.

On May 12, 2005, we sold our corporate office building located in Charlotte, North Carolina. For further information about the sale, see Note 14 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. We have negotiated a ten-year lease with renewable options for space in a building that is currently under construction and anticipated to be ready for occupancy in late 2005. The lease payments for the ten-year term range from $3 million to $3.4 million annually. We have leased our current office building from the new owner pending occupancy of the new office space.

Subject to various governmental approvals, we intend to jointly develop an underground interstate natural gas storage facility in West Virginia with Columbia Hardy Corporation, a subsidiary of Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation. Total project capital expenditures are estimated at $122 million over a five-year period, of which our share is $61 million.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities. Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $(206.9) million and $(134.5) million for the three months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, $(143.5) million and $(204.2) million for the six months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $(62.7) million and $284.4 million for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Funds are generally provided from bank borrowings and the issuance of Common Stock through dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans. We sell Common Stock and long-term debt to cover cash requirements when market and other conditions favor such long-term financing. As of April 30, 2005, our current assets were $328.3 million and our current liabilities were $233.2 million.

Under committed bank lines of credit totaling $200 million, outstanding short-term borrowings during the three months and six months ended April 30, 2005, are detailed below. As of April 30, 2005, we had additional uncommitted lines of credit totaling $103 million on a no fee and as needed, if available, basis.


	Three Months						Six Months
In thousands	High			Low			High			Low
Outstanding short-term borrowings	$	171,500		$	—		$	229,500		$	—
Interest rates		3.175	%		2.76	%		3.175	%		2.1125	%

Effective May 1, 2005, our committed bank lines of credit total $250 million and our uncommitted lines of credit total $98 million.

The level of short-term borrowings can vary significantly due to changes in the wholesale prices of natural gas and to increased purchases of natural gas supplies to serve customer demand and to refill storage. Short-term debt may increase when wholesale prices for natural gas increase because we must pay suppliers for the gas before we recover our costs from customers through their monthly bills. Gas prices could continue to increase and fluctuate. If wholesale gas prices remain high, we may incur more short-term debt to pay for natural gas supplies and other operating costs since collections from customers could be slower and some customers may

not be able to pay their gas bills on a timely basis.

Under our Common Stock Open Market Purchase Program, which began on September 1, 2004, we utilize a broker to repurchase shares on the open market. Such shares are then cancelled and become authorized but unissued shares available for issuance to the Long-Term Incentive Plan and to dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plans.

We have paid quarterly dividends on our Common Stock since 1956. The amount of cash dividends that may be paid is restricted by provisions contained in certain note agreements under which long-term debt was issued. None of our retained earnings were restricted as of April 30, 2005.

As of April 30, 2005, our capitalization consisted of 41% in long-term debt and 59% in common equity. Our long-term targeted capitalization ratio is 45-50% in long-term debt and 50-55% in common equity.

As of April 30, 2005, all of our long-term debt was unsecured. Our long-term debt is rated “A” by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and “A3” by Moody’s Investors. Credit ratings impact our ability to obtain short-term and long-term financing and the cost of such financings.

We are subject to default provisions related to our long-term debt and short-term bank lines of credit. Failure to satisfy any of the default provisions would result in total outstanding issues of debt becoming due. There are cross-default provisions in all our debt agreements. As of April 30, 2005, we are in compliance with all default provisions.

Estimated Future Contractual Obligations

During the three months ended April 30, 2005, there were no material changes to our estimated future contractual obligations outside the ordinary course of business.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases that are discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in our Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2004.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience, where applicable, and other relevant factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate estimates and assumptions and make adjustments in subsequent periods to reflect more current information if we determine that modifications in assumptions and estimates are warranted.

Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if it requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made and changes in the estimate or a different estimate that could have been used would have had a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We consider regulatory accounting, revenue recognition, goodwill and pension and postretirement benefits to be our critical accounting estimates. Management is responsible for the selection of the critical accounting estimates presented in our Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2004, in “Management’s Discussion and

Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Management has discussed these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. There have been no changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates since October 31, 2004.

Gas Supply and Regulatory Proceedings

In 1998, the North Carolina General Assembly enacted the Clean Water and Natural Gas Critical Needs Act of 1998, which provided for the issuance of $200 million of general obligation bonds of the state for the purpose of providing grants, loans or other financing for the cost of constructing natural gas facilities in unserved areas of the state.

EasternNC has been granted a certificate by the NCUC to provide natural gas service to 14 unserved counties in the eastern-most part of North Carolina. These counties historically have not been able to obtain gas service because of the relatively sparse population of the counties and the resulting uneconomic feasibility of providing service. The NCUC has issued orders approving $188.3 million of the bond fund to EasternNC for construction of natural gas facilities in the 14 counties. From November 1, 2004 through March 31, 2005, we filed for reimbursement of $19.8 million from the bond fund and received $19.3 million for previous requests. As of April 30, 2005, there was $11.4 million remaining of the bond funds allocated to EasternNC. As of April 30, 2005 and 2004, we had receivables of $4 million and $3.6 million, respectively, from the bond fund recorded in “Receivables” in the consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with NCUC orders, we must contribute funding to the project that is not subject to bond reimbursement. During the quarter ended April 30, 2005, we contributed $3.5 million for construction of natural gas facilities. We estimate additional funding that is not subject to bond reimbursement will be approximately $6 million.

On February 1, 2005, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with the other owner of EasternNC under which they will sell all of their shares of common stock of, and assign all of their rights and obligations in, EasternNC to Piedmont. Closing of the transaction is scheduled to occur three business days after all of the following conditions are met:

•   Approval by Piedmont’s Board of Directors.

•   Consideration of $1.00 paid by Piedmont to the other owner.

•   Approval of the acquisition and merger by the NCUC.

•   Approval by the NCUC to roll-in and combine the rate structure of EasternNC into Piedmont’s rate structure on terms and conditions acceptable to Piedmont.

The NCUC has scheduled a hearing for the acquisition and merger on June 23, 2005. The outcome of this proceeding cannot be determined at this time. The requested approval of the roll-in of EasternNC’s rate structure into Piedmont is part of the general rate case discussed below.

On April 1, 2005, we filed a general rate application with the NCUC requesting a consolidation of the respective rate bases, revenues and expenses of Piedmont, our NCNG division and EasternNC. In addition to a unified and uniform rate structure for all customers served by us in North Carolina, the application requested a general restructuring and overall increase in rates and charges for all customers to produce overall annual revenues of $36.9 million, or 3.7% above the combined current annual revenues, a consolidation and/or amortization of certain deferred accounts, changes to cost allocations and rate design including an innovative “conservation tariff” mechanism that decouples margin recovery from residential and commercial customer consumption, changes and unification of existing service regulations and tariffs, implementation of a collection and contribution mechanism and common depreciation rates for plant. New rates are proposed to be effective November 1, 2005. A hearing has been set for September 6, 2005. The outcome of this proceeding cannot be determined at this time.

On February 16, 2005, the Natural Gas Rate Stabilization Act of 2005 became effective in South Carolina. The law provides natural gas utilities, including Piedmont, with a mechanism for the regular, periodic and more frequent (annual) adjustment of rates which is intended to: (1) encourage investment by natural gas utilities, (2) enhance economic development efforts, (3) reduce the cost of rate adjustment proceedings and (4) result in smaller but more frequent rate increases to customers. If the utility elects to operate under the Act, the annual filing will provide that the utility’s rate of return on equity will remain within a 50-basis points band above or below the current allowed rate of return on equity. On April 26, 2005, we filed an election with the PSCSC to adopt this new mechanism. We intend to file our report of updated costs, revenues and plant adjustments consistent with our election notice on or before June 15, 2005. After receiving comments from any interested party and the PSCSC’s staff review, the PSCSC will issue an initial order on or before October 15, 2005, and new rates will be effective on November 1, 2005, which is the beginning of our 2006 fiscal year.

Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets” (Statement 153). The provisions of Statement 153 are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges that occur in our fiscal quarter beginning August 1, 2005. We believe the adoption of Statement 153 will not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” (Statement 154), a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and SFAS No. 3. Statement 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and changes the requirements for accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle. Retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of the change in accounting principle is required unless it is impracticable. Statement 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005, with earlier application permitted in fiscal years beginning after June 1, 2005.

Forward-Looking Statements

Documents we file with the SEC may contain forward-looking statements. In addition, our senior

management and other authorized spokespersons may make forward-looking statements in print or orally to analysts, investors, the media and others. Forward-looking statements concern, among others, plans, objectives, proposed capital expenditures and future events or performance. These statements reflect our current expectations and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Although we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, actual results may differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ include:

• Regulatory issues, including those that affect allowed rates of return, terms and conditions of service, rate structures and financings. We monitor our effectiveness in achieving the allowed rates of return and initiate rate proceedings or operating changes as needed. In addition, we purchase natural gas transportation and storage services from interstate and intrastate pipeline companies whose rates and services are also regulated.

• Residential, commercial and industrial growth in our service areas. The ability to grow our customer base and the pace of that growth are impacted by general business and economic conditions and the overall strength of the economy in our service areas and the country, including such factors as interest rates, inflation, fluctuations in the capital markets and increases in the wholesale cost of natural gas.

• Deregulation, regulatory restructuring and competition in the energy industry. We face competition from electric companies and energy marketing and trading companies and we expect this highly competitive environment to continue.

• The potential loss of large-volume industrial customers to alternate fuels or to bypass or the shift by such customers to special competitive contracts at lower per-unit margins.

• Regulatory issues, customer growth, deregulation, economic and capital market conditions, the cost and availability of natural gas and weather conditions can impact our ability to meet internal performance goals.

• The capital-intensive nature of our business. In order to maintain growth, we must add to our natural gas distribution system each year. The cost of this construction may be affected by the cost of obtaining governmental approvals, development project delays or changes in project costs. Weather, general economic conditions and the cost of funds to finance our capital projects can materially alter the cost of a project. Our internally generated cash flows are not adequate to finance the full cost of this construction. As a result, we rely on access to both short-term and long-term capital markets as a significant source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by cash flows from operations.

• Changes in the availability and cost of natural gas. To meet firm customer requirements, we must acquire sufficient gas supplies and pipeline capacity to ensure delivery to our distribution system while also ensuring that our supply and capacity contracts allow us to remain competitive. Natural gas is an unregulated commodity market subject to supply and demand and price volatility. Producers, marketers and pipelines are subject to operating and financial risks associated with exploring, drilling, producing, gathering, marketing and transporting natural gas and have risks that increase our exposure to supply and price fluctuations.

• Changes in weather conditions. Weather conditions and other natural phenomena can have a material impact on our earnings. Severe weather conditions, including destructive weather patterns such as hurricanes, can impact our suppliers and the pipelines that deliver gas to our distribution system. Weather conditions directly influence the demand for and the cost of natural gas.

• Changes in environmental and safety regulations and the cost of compliance. We are subject to extensive federal, state and local regulations. Compliance with such regulations may result in increased capital or operating costs.

• Ability to retain and attract professional and technical employees. To provide quality service to our customers and meet regulatory requirements, we are dependent on our ability to recruit, train, motivate and retain qualified employees.

• Changes in accounting regulations and practices. We are subject to accounting regulations and practices issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies. New accounting standards could

be issued that could change the way we record revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. Future changes in accounting standards could affect our reported earnings or increase our liabilities.

• Earnings from our equity method investments. We invest in companies that have risks that are inherent in their businesses and we assume such risks as an equity investor.

All of these factors are difficult to predict and many are beyond our control. Accordingly, while we believe the assumptions underlying our forward-looking statements to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that these statements will approximate actual experience or that the expectations derived from them will be realized. When used in our documents or oral presentations, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “seek,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “budget,” “forecast,” “goal” or similar words or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could” or “may” are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Factors relating to regulation and management are also described or incorporated by reference in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as information included in, or incorporated by reference from, future filings with the SEC. Some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ have been described above. Others may be described elsewhere in this report. There may also be other factors besides those described above or incorporated by reference in this report or in the Form 10-K that could cause actual conditions, events or results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations only as of the date they are made. We assume no duty to update these statements should expectations change or actual results differ from current expectations except as required by applicable laws and regulations. Please reference our web site at www.piedmontng.com for current information. Our filings on Form 10-K, Form 10-K/A, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K are available on our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after the report is filed with the SEC.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We hold all financial instruments discussed below for purposes other than trading. We are potentially exposed to market risk due to changes in interest rates and the cost of gas. Our exposure to interest rate changes relates primarily to short-term debt. We are exposed to interest rate changes to long-term debt when we are in the market to issue long-term debt. As of April 30, 2005, all of our long-term debt was at fixed rates. Exposure to gas cost variations relates to the wholesale supply, demand and price of natural gas.

Interest Rate Risk

We have short-term borrowing arrangements to provide working capital and general corporate funds. The level of borrowings under such arrangements varies from period to period depending upon many factors, including investments in capital projects. Future short-term interest expense and payments will be impacted by both short-term interest rates and borrowing levels.

As of April 30, 2005, we had no short-term debt outstanding; however, the following table reflects our borrowings during the three months and six months ended April 30, 2005.


	Three Months						Six Months
In thousands	High			Low			High			Low
Outstanding short-term borrowings	$	171,500		$	—		$	229,500		$	—
Interest rates		3.175	%		2.76	%		3.175	%		2.1125	%


	Three Months			Six Months
Weighted average interest rate during the period		2.88	%		2.62	%

Information as of April 30, 2005, about our long-term debt that, for holders of our long-term debt, is sensitive to changes in interest rates is presented below.


																			Fair Value
																			as of
	Expected Maturity Date																		April 30,
In thousands	2005		2006			2007		2008		2009			Thereafter			Total			2005
Fixed Rate
Long–Term Debt	$	—	$	35,000		$	—	$	—	$	30,000		$	595,000		$	660,000		$	779,055
Average Interest Rate		—		9.44	%		—		—		7.35	%		6.87	%		7.03	%

Commodity Price Risk

In the normal course of business, we utilize exchange-traded contracts of various duration for the forward sale and purchase of a portion of our natural gas requirements. We manage our gas supply costs through a portfolio of short- and long-term procurement contracts with various suppliers and financial price-hedging instruments. Due to cost-based rate regulation in our utility operations, we have limited financial exposure to changes in commodity prices as substantially all changes in purchased gas costs and the costs of hedging our gas supplies are passed on to customers through PGA mechanisms.

Additional information concerning market risk is set forth in “Financial Condition and Liquidity” in Item 2 of this Form 10-Q.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of April 30, 2005, management, including the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Such disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that all information required to be disclosed in our reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on our evaluation process, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. During the last fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We have only routine litigation in the normal course of business and do not expect the outcomes to have any material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

a)   None.

b)   None.

c)   Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

The following table provides information with respect to repurchases of our Common Stock under the Common Stock Open Market Purchase Program during the quarter ended April 30, 2005.


					Total Number of		Maximum
	Total		Average		Shares Purchased		Number of
	Number		Price		As Part of Publicly		Shares that May
	of Shares		Per		Announced		Yet be Purchased
Period	Repurchased		Share		Program		Under the Program *
Beginning of the Period								2,516,400
February		104,000	$	23.33		104,000		2,412,400
March		57,200	$	23.58		57,200		2,355,200
April		118,000	$	22.72		118,000		2,237,200

Total		279,200	$	23.12		279,200

*	Common Stock Open Market Purchase Program was announced on June 4, 2004, to repurchase up to three million shares of Common Stock. There is no expiration date for the program.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

We held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on March 4, 2005, to elect four directors and to ratify the selection of independent auditors. The record date for determining the shareholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting was January 12, 2005. We solicited proxies for the meeting according to section 14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. There was no solicitation in opposition to management’s

solicitations.

Shareholders elected all of the nominees for director as listed in the proxy statement by the following votes:


	Shares Voted		Shares Voted		Shares
	FOR		WITHHELD		NOT VOTED
For terms expiring in 2008:
Malcolm E. Everett III		66,951,921		343,232		9,329,394
Muriel W. Helms		66,899,205		395,948		9,329,394
Frank B. Holding, Jr.		66,948,600		346,553		9,329,394
Minor M. Shaw		66,919,673		375,480		9,329,394

Directors John W. Harris, Aubrey B. Harwell, Jr., and David E. Shi will continue in office until 2006. Directors Jerry W. Amos, D. Hayes Clement and Thomas E. Skains will continue in office until 2007.

Shareholders ratified the selection by the Board of Directors of the firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2005, by the following vote:

Voted

NOT

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAINING

VOTED

66,581,335

516,684

197,134

9,329,394

Item 5. Other Information

(a) None.

(b) There have been no changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Directors.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibits –
	10.1	Service Agreement (Contract No. 9025849) (15,000 dekatherms per day), dated February 28, 2005, between Piedmont and Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC.

	10.2	Amendment to Service Agreements under Rate Schedule FT (Contract No. 1003702) (376,016 dekatherms per day) dated March 15, 2005, between Piedmont and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation.

	31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Executive Officer.

	31.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Financial Officer.

	32.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Executive Officer.

	32.2	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Financial Officer.

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended April 30, 2005

Exhibits

10.1   Service Agreement (Contract No. 9025849) (15,000 dekatherms per day), dated February 28, 2005, between Piedmont and Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC.

10.2   Amendment to Service Agreements under Rate Schedule FT (Contract No. 1003702) (376,016 dekatherms per day) dated March 15, 2005, between Piedmont and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation.

31.1   Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Executive Officer.

31.2   Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Financial Officer.

32.1   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Executive Officer.

32.2   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Chief Financial Officer.


Date June 9, 2005		/s/ David J. Dzuricky

		David J. Dzuricky Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date June 9, 2005		/s/ Barry L. Guy

		Barry L. Guy Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

	•	$26.5 million from increased commodity gas costs passed through to customers.

	•	$9.9 million from an increase in volumes delivered of 1.5 million dekatherms.

	•	$4.2 million from the WNA due to credits to customers of $6.9 million in 2005 compared with credits of $2.8 million in 2004. Weather for the three months ended April 30, 2005, was 2% colder than normal, compared with 4% colder than normal for the same period in 2004.

	•	$2.8 million from secondary market transactions. Secondary market transactions are off-system sales and capacity release arrangements.

	•	$75.9 million from increased commodity gas costs passed through to customers.

	•	$7.4 million from the WNA due to surcharges to customers of $7.2 million in 2005 compared with credits of $.2 million in 2004. Weather for the six months ended April 30, 2005, was 5% warmer than normal, compared with 1% colder than normal for the same period in 2004.

	•	$6.4 million from secondary market transactions.

	•	$102 million from NCNG and EasternNC, which included twelve months activity for 2005 and only seven months activity for 2004. Of this increase, $81 million was from an increase in volumes delivered of 28.6 million dekatherms and $17.2 million was from non-volumetric billings, such as facilities charges, reconnect fees and late payment fees.

	•	$49.7 million from secondary market transactions.

	•	$46.5 million from increased commodity gas costs passed through to customers.

	•	$8.7 million from the WNA due to surcharges to customers of $10.9 million in 2005 compared with surcharges of $2.2 million in 2004, excluding NCNG activity. Weather for the twelve months ended April 30, 2005, was 9% warmer than normal, compared with normal weather for the same period in 2004.

	•	$26.5 million from increased commodity gas costs.

	•	$7.2 million due to an increase in volumes delivered of 1.5 million dekatherms.

	•	$67.7 million from NCNG and EasternNC, which included twelve months activity for 2005 and only seven months activity for 2004.

	•	$51 million from secondary market transactions.

	•	$46.5 million from increased commodity gas costs.

	•	$1.2 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued vacation pay liability resulting in part to increased vacation benefits effective January 1, 2005.

	•	$.6 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued long-term incentive plan liability to reflect an additional award effective November 1, 2004.

	•	$.5 million in employee benefits expense primarily due to pension and health insurance costs.

	•	$.4 million in outside labor primarily due to costs of data-center sourcing.

	•	$1.1 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued vacation pay liability resulting in part to increased vacation benefits effective January 1, 2005.

	•	$1.3 million in employee benefits expense primarily due to pension and health insurance costs.

	•	$.7 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued long-term incentive plan liability to reflect an additional award effective November 1, 2004.

	•	$.7 million in utilities primarily due to increased long distance telephone service and data costs.

	•	$.5 million in outside labor primarily due to costs of data-center sourcing.

	•	$11.4 million in payroll costs primarily due to accruals for the long-term and short-term incentive plans, merit pay increases and the addition of NCNG employees for twelve months in the 2005 period compared with only seven months in the 2004 period.

	•	$4 million in other corporate expenses primarily due to amortization of NCNG integration costs and the deferral in 2003 to a regulatory asset of EasternNC’s operations and maintenance costs that had been expensed prior to September 30, 2003.

	•	$2.9 million in outside labor primarily due to NCNG operations and to costs of data-center sourcing.

	•	$2.8 million in employee benefits expense primarily due to pension and postretirement health care and life insurance costs.

	•	$2.4 million due to accrual of the projected benefit obligation for the Board of Director’s retirement plan.

	•	$2.1 million in consulting fees primarily due to legal fees, accounting and auditing fees, business process improvement programs, the pipeline integrity management program and the integrated mapping project.

	•	$1.6 million in utilities primarily due to increased long distance telephone service and data costs.

	•	$1.3 million in transportation expenses primarily due to NCNG operations.

	•	$.7 million in payroll costs due to an increase in the accrued vacation pay liability resulting in part to increased vacation benefits effective January 1, 2005.

	•	$1.6 million in property taxes from NCNG operations.

	•	$1.8 million in Tennessee property taxes discussed above.

	•	$.8 million in payroll taxes.

	•	$.3 million decrease due to an increase in AFUDC allocated to debt.

	•	$.3 million increase in interest on short-term debt primarily due to higher amounts of debt outstanding at higher interest rates.

	•	$1.5 million decrease in interest on amounts due to/from customers due to higher average net receivables in the current period compared with the similar prior period.

	•	$.9 million decrease in interest on short-term debt due to the repayment of the commercial paper program in December 2003 that we utilized to temporarily finance the NCNG acquisition.

	•	$.4 million decrease due to an increase in AFUDC allocated to debt.

	•	$1.2 million increase in interest on long-term debt due to higher balances outstanding as a result of the permanent financing of the NCNG acquisition.

	•	$.7 million increase in interest on short-term debt due to higher amounts of debt outstanding at higher interest rates.

	•	$5.9 million increase in interest on long-term debt due to higher balances outstanding, including amounts due to the permanent financing of the NCNG acquisition.

	•	$.8 million increase in interest on short-term debt due to higher amounts of debt outstanding at higher interest rates.

	•	$.8 million increase in interest in connection with the Internal Revenue Service audit of our federal income tax return for the year ended October 31, 2001.

	•	$2.1 million decrease in interest on amounts due to/from customers due to significantly higher average net receivables in 2005 compared with average net payables in 2004.

	•	$1.9 million decrease in interest on short-term debt due to the repayment of commercial paper in December 2003 that we utilized to temporarily finance the NCNG acquisition.

	•	$.7 million decrease due to an increase in AFUDC allocated to debt.

	•	Approval by Piedmont’s Board of Directors.

	•	Consideration of $1.00 paid by Piedmont to the other owner.

	•	Approval of the acquisition and merger by the NCUC.

	•	Approval by the NCUC to roll-in and combine the rate structure of EasternNC into Piedmont’s rate structure on terms and conditions acceptable to Piedmont.