Back to GetFilings.com





UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2005
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _________________ TO _________________

Commission File number 0-25033

The Banc Corporation
--------------------
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware 63-1201350
- ---------------------------------------------- --------------------------------
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification No.)

17 North 20th Street, Birmingham, Alabama 35203
-----------------------------------------------
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(205) 327-3600
--------------
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class Outstanding as of March 31, 2005
- ----------------------------- --------------------------------

Common stock, $.001 par value 18,756,632



PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THE BANC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2005 2004
----------- ------------
(UNAUDITED)

Assets
Cash and due from banks $ 25,018 $ 23,489
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks 8,580 11,411
Federal funds sold 7,000 11,000
Investment securities available for sale 264,559 288,308
Mortgage loans held for sale 21,991 8,095
Loans, net of unearned income 942,391 934,868
Less: Allowance for loan losses (12,957) (12,543)
----------- -----------
Net loans 929,434 922,325
----------- -----------
Premises and equipment, net 57,452 60,434
Accrued interest receivable 6,672 6,237
Stock in FHLB and Federal Reserve Bank 11,830 11,787
Cash surrender value of life insurance 38,268 38,369
Other assets 56,045 41,673
----------- -----------

TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,426,849 $ 1,423,128
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing $ 93,499 $ 89,487
Interest-bearing 985,837 977,719
----------- -----------
TOTAL DEPOSITS 1,079,336 1,067,206

Advances from FHLB 146,090 156,090
Federal funds borrowed and security repurchase agreements 47,813 49,456
Notes payable 3,913 3,965
Junior subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts 31,959 31,959
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 18,592 13,913
----------- -----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 1,327,703 1,322,589

Stockholders' Equity
Convertible preferred stock, par value $.001 per share; authorized 5,000,000 shares;
shares issued and outstanding 62,000 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 - -
Common stock, par value $.001 per share; authorized 25,000,000 shares;
shares issued 19,020,943 and 18,025,932, respectively;
outstanding 18,756,632 and 17,749,846, respectively 19 18
Surplus - preferred 6,193 6,193
- common stock 76,324 68,428
Retained earnings 21,575 29,591
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (2,559) (1,094)
Treasury stock, at cost (368) (390)
Unearned ESOP stock (1,705) (1,758)
Unearned restricted stock (333) (449)
----------- -----------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 99,146 100,539
----------- -----------

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 1,426,849 $ 1,423,128
=========== ===========


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



THE BANC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)



THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
---------------------
2005 2004
-------- --------

INTEREST INCOME
Interest and fees on loans $ 14,878 $ 13,567
Interest on investment securities
Taxable 2,925 1,713
Exempt from Federal income tax 58 15
Interest on federal funds sold 82 34
Interest and dividends on other investments 243 165
-------- --------

Total interest income 18,186 15,494

INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on deposits 6,037 4,277
Interest on other borrowed funds 1,844 1,666
Interest on subordinated debentures 698 626
-------- --------

Total interest expense 8,579 6,569
-------- --------

NET INTEREST INCOME 9,607 8,925

Provision for loan losses 750 -
-------- --------

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES 8,857 8,925

NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges and fees on deposits 1,112 1,391
Mortgage banking income 446 404
Investment securities (losses) gains (909) 391
Gain on sale of branches - 739
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance 351 403
Other income 477 646
-------- --------

TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME 1,477 3,974

NONINTEREST EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits 5,402 5,586
Occupancy, furniture and equipment expense 1,981 2,164
Management separation costs 12,377 -
Other operating expenses 3,562 3,602
-------- --------

TOTAL NONINTEREST EXPENSES 23,322 11,352
-------- --------

(Loss) income before income taxes (12,988) 1,547

INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE (4,972) 319
-------- --------

NET (LOSS) INCOME $ (8,016) $ 1,228
======== ========

BASIC NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE $ (0.44) $ 0.07
======== ========

DILUTED NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE $ (0.44) $ 0.07
======== ========

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING 18,406 17,559
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING, ASSUMING DILUTION 18,406 18,572


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



THE BANC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW (UNAUDITED)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31
-----------------------
2005 2004
--------- ---------

NET CASH (USED) PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ (20,000) $ 4,169
--------- ---------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net decrease (increase) in interest-bearing deposits in other banks 2,831 (36,591)
Net decrease (increase) in federal funds sold 4,000 (9,000)
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale - 59,269
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale 15,489 23,434
Purchases of investment securities available for sale (5,040) (111,104)
Net (increase) decrease in loans (5,690) 5,209
Net sales (purchases) of premises and equipment 2,093 (1,426)
Net cash paid in branch sale - (6,626)
Purchase of life insurance - (5,000)
Increase in other investments (43) (1,750)
--------- ---------

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 13,640 (83,585)
--------- ---------

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposit accounts 12,130 48,839
Net (decrease) increase in FHLB advances and other borrowed funds (11,643) 39,142
Payments made on notes payable (53) (52)
Proceeds from sale of common stock 7,455 -
--------- ---------

Net cash provided by financing activities 7,889 87,929
--------- ---------

Net increase in cash and due from banks 1,529 8,513

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period 23,489 31,679
--------- ---------

CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS AT END OF PERIOD $ 25,018 $ 40,192
========= =========


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q, and, therefore, do
not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of
financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles. For a summary of significant
accounting policies that have been consistently followed, see Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. It is management's opinion that
all adjustments, consisting of only normal and recurring items necessary for a
fair presentation, have been included. Operating results for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005.

The statement of financial condition at December 31, 2004, has been derived from
the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements.

NOTE 2 - RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS
No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which is a revision of SFAS 123 and
supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25. On April 14, 2005, The
Securities and Exchange Commission announced the adoption of a new rule that
amended the compliance dates for SFAS No. 123R. Under SFAS No. 123R, registrants
would have been required to implement the standard as of the beginning of the
first interim or annual period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Commission's
new rule allows issuers to implement Statement No. 123R at the beginning of
their next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period, that begins after
June 15, 2005. The Commission's new rule does not change the accounting required
by SFAS No. 123R; it changes only the dates for compliance with the standard.
The new standard requires companies to recognize an expense in the statement of
operations for the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based
compensation issued to employees, but expresses no preference for a type of
valuation method. This expense will be recognized over the period during which
an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. SFAS 123R
carries forward prior guidance on accounting for awards to non-employees. If an
equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost
will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the
modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately prior to
the modification. The Corporation is evaluating the impact on its results of
operations that will result from adopting SFAS 123R, but expects it to be
comparable to the pro forma effects of applying the original SFAS 123 (see Note
10).

NOTE 3 - RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

On January 24, 2005, the Corporation announced that it had entered into a series
of executive management change agreements. These agreements set forth the
employment of C. Stanley Bailey as Chief Executive Officer and a director of the
Corporation and chairman of our banking subsidiary, C. Marvin Scott as President
of the corporation and our banking subsidiary, and Rick D. Gardner as Chief
Operating Officer of the Corporation and our banking subsidiary. These
agreements also allowed the purchase by Mr. Bailey, Mr. Scott and Mr. Gardner,
along with other investors, of 925,636 shares of common stock of the Corporation
at $8.17 per share. The Corporation also entered into agreements with


James A. Taylor and James A. Taylor, Jr. that would allow them continue to serve
as Chairman of the Board of the Corporation and as a director of the
Corporation, respectively, but would cease their employment as officers and
directors of the Corporation's banking subsidiary.

Under the agreement with Mr. Taylor, in lieu of the payments to which he would
have been entitled under his employment agreement, the Corporation paid to Mr.
Taylor $3,940,155 on January 24, 2005, and is scheduled to pay an additional
$3,152,124 on January 24, 2006, and $788,031 on January 24, 2007. The agreement
also provides for the provision of certain insurance benefits to Mr. Taylor, the
transfer of a "key man" life insurance policy to Mr. Taylor, and the maintenance
of such policy by us for five years (with the cost of maintaining such policy
included in the above amounts), in each case substantially as required by his
employment agreement. This obligation to provide such payments and benefits to
Mr. Taylor is absolute and will survive the death or disability of Mr. Taylor.

Under the agreement with Mr. Taylor, Jr., in lieu of the payments to which he
would have been entitled under his employment agreement, the Corporation paid to
Mr. Taylor, Jr., $1,382,872 on January 24, 2005. The agreement also provides for
the provision of certain insurance benefits to Mr. Taylor, Jr. and for the
immediate vesting of his unvested incentive awards and deferred compensation in
each case substantially as required by his employment agreement. This obligation
to provide such payments and benefits to Mr. Taylor, Jr. is absolute and will
survive the death or disability of Mr. Taylor, Jr.

In connection with the above management separation transaction, the Corporation
recognized pre-tax expenses of $12.4 million in the first quarter of 2005. At
March 31, 2005, the Corporation had $4.2 million of accrued liabilities related
to these agreements. See Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004 for further information.

NOTE 4 - ASSET SALES

In February 2004, the Corporation's banking subsidiary sold its Morris, Alabama
branch, which had assets of approximately $1,037,000 and liabilities of
$8,217,000. The Corporation realized a $739,000 pre-tax gain on the sale.

In March 2005, the Corporation sold its corporate aircraft, realizing a $355,000
pre-tax loss.

NOTE 5 - SEGMENT REPORTING

The Corporation has two reportable segments, the Alabama Region and the Florida
Region. The Alabama Region consists of operations located throughout the state
of Alabama. The Florida Region consists of operations located in the eastern
panhandle region of Florida. The Corporation's reportable segments are managed
as separate business units because they are located in different geographic
areas. Both segments derive revenues from the delivery of financial services.
These services include commercial loans, mortgage loans, consumer loans, deposit
accounts and other financial services.



The Corporation evaluates performance and allocates resources based on profit or
loss from operations. There are no material intersegment sales or transfers. Net
interest revenue is used as the basis for performance evaluation rather than its
components, total interest revenue and total interest expense. The accounting
policies used by each reportable segment are the same as those discussed in Note
1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004. All costs have been allocated to the reportable
segments. Therefore, combined amounts agree to the consolidated totals (in
thousands).



Alabama Florida
Region Region Combined
----------- ----------- -----------

Three months ended March 31, 2005
Net interest income $ 6,778 $ 2,829 $ 9,607
Provision for loan losses 733 17 750
Noninterest income 1,153 324 1,477
Noninterest expense(2) (3) 22,174 1,148 23,322
Income tax (benefit) expense (5,554) 582 (4,972)
Net (loss) income (9,422) 1,406 (8,016)
Total assets 1,151,774 275,075 1,426,849

Three months ended March 31, 2004
Net interest income $ 6,327 $ 2,598 $ 8,925
Provision for loan losses(1) 972 (972) -
Noninterest income(1) 3,604 370 3,974
Noninterest expense(2) 8,875 2,477 11,352
Income tax (benefit) expense (104) 423 319
Net income 188 1,040 1,228
Total assets(1) 1,034,729 214,008 1,248,737


(1) See Note 4 concerning branch sales. Also, in January 2004, certain loans
were transferred from the Florida segment to our special assets department
which is included in the Alabama segment.

(2) Noninterest expense for the Alabama region includes all expenses for the
holding company, which have not been prorated to the Florida region.

(3) See Notes 3 and 4 concerning the amount of management separation charges
and loss on the sale of assets.

NOTE 6 - NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net (loss)
income per common share (in thousands, except per share amounts):



Three Months Ended
March 31
----------------------
2005 2004
-------- --------

Numerator:
For basic and diluted, net (loss) income $ (8,016) $ 1,228
======== ========
Denominator:
For basic, weighted average common shares outstanding 18,406 17,559
Effect of dilutive stock options and convertible preferred - 1,013
-------- --------

Average diluted common shares outstanding 18,406 18,572
======== ========

Basic and diluted net (loss) income per common share $ (.44) $ .07
======== ========




NOTE 7 - COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

Total comprehensive (loss) income was $ (9,481,000) and $1,756,000 for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Total
comprehensive income consists of net (loss) income and the unrealized gain or
loss on the Corporation's available for sale investment securities portfolio
arising during the period.

During the first quarter of 2005, the Corporation realized a $909,000 pre-tax
loss as a result of a $50 million sale of bonds in the investment portfolio
which closed in April 2005. The Corporation reinvested the proceeds in bonds
intended to enhance the yield and cash flows of its investment securities
portfolio. The new investment securities will be classified as available for
sale.

NOTE 8 - INCOME TAXES

The difference between the effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate in
2005 and 2004 is primarily due to certain tax-exempt income.

NOTE 9 - JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES

The Corporation has sponsored two trusts, TBC Capital Statutory Trust II ("TBC
Capital II") and TBC Capital Statutory Trust III ("TBC Capital III"), of which
100% of the common equity is owned by the Corporation. The trusts were formed
for the purpose of issuing Corporation-obligated mandatory redeemable trust
preferred securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from
the sale of such trust preferred securities solely in junior subordinated debt
securities of the Corporation (the debentures). The debentures held by each
trust are the sole assets of that trust. Distributions on the trust preferred
securities issued by each trust are payable semi-annually at a rate per annum
equal to the interest rate being earned by the trust on the debentures held by
that trust. The trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption,
in whole or in part, upon repayment of the debentures. The Corporation has
entered into agreements which, taken collectively, fully and unconditionally
guarantee the trust preferred securities subject to the terms of each of the
guarantees. The debentures held by the TBC Capital II and TBC Capital III
capital trusts are first redeemable, in whole or in part, by the Corporation on
September 7, 2010 and July 25, 2006, respectively.

The trust preferred securities held by the trusts qualify as Tier 1 capital for
the Corporation under Federal Reserve Board guidelines.

Consolidated debt obligations related to subsidiary trusts holding solely
debentures of the Corporation follow:



March 31, 2005 December 31, 2004
-------------- -----------------
(In thousands)

10.6% junior subordinated debentures owed to TBC Capital
Statutory Trust II due September 7, 2030 $ 15,464 $ 15,464
6-month LIBOR plus 3.75% junior subordinated debentures
owed to TBC Capital Statutory Trust III due July 25, 2031 16,495 16,495
-------- --------
Total junior subordinated debentures owed to
unconsolidated subsidiary trusts $ 31,959 $ 31,959
======== ========




As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the interest rate on the $16,495,000
subordinated debentures was 6.71% and 5.74%, respectively.

Currently, the Corporation must obtain regulatory approval prior to paying any
dividends on these trust preferred securities. The Federal Reserve approved the
timely payment of the Corporation's semi-annual distributions on its trust
preferred securities in January and March, 2005.

NOTE 10 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

During the first quarter of 2005, the Corporation issued 925,636 shares of its
common stock at $8.17 per share, the then current market price, to the new
members of the management team and other investors, in a private placement. The
Corporation received proceeds, net of issuance cost, of $7,328,000.

On April 1, 2002, the Corporation issued 157,500 shares of restricted common
stock to certain directors and key employees pursuant to the Second Amended and
Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. Under the Restricted Stock Agreements, the
stock may not be sold or assigned in any manner for a five-year period that
began on April 1, 2002. During this restricted period, the participant is
eligible to receive dividends and exercise voting privileges. The restricted
stock also has a corresponding vesting period, with one-third vesting at the end
of each of the third, fourth and fifth years. The restricted stock was issued at
$7.00 per share, or $1,120,000, and classified as a contra-equity account,
"Unearned restricted stock", in stockholders' equity. During 2003, 15,000 shares
of this restricted common stock were forfeited. On January 24, 2005, the
Corporation issued 49,375 additional shares of restricted common stock to
certain key employees. Under the terms of the management separation agreement
(see Note 3) entered into during the first quarter of 2005, vesting was
accelerated on 99,375 shares of restricted stock. Restricted shares outstanding
as of March 31, 2005 were 92,500 and the remaining amount in the unearned
restricted stock account is $333,000. This balance is being amortized as expense
as the stock is earned during the restricted period. The amounts of restricted
shares are included in the diluted earnings per share calculation, using the
treasury stock method, until the shares vest.

Once vested, the shares become outstanding for basic earnings per share. For the
periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Corporation recognized $519,000 and
$50,000, respectively, in restricted stock expense. Of the $519,000 expense in
2005, $486,000 is related to the accelerated vesting from the management
separation agreements and is included in the amount of management separation
cost.

The Corporation adopted a leveraged employee stock ownership plan (the "ESOP")
effective May 15, 2002 that covers all eligible employees that have attained the
age of twenty-one and have completed a year of service. As of March 31, 2005,
the ESOP has been leveraged with 273,400 shares of the Corporation's common
stock purchased in the open market and classified as a contra-equity account,
"Unearned ESOP shares," in stockholders' equity.

On January 29, 2003, the ESOP trustees finalized a $2,100,000 promissory note to
reimburse the Corporation for the funds used to leverage the ESOP. The
unreleased shares and a guarantee of the Corporation secure the promissory note,
which has been classified as a note payable on the Corporation's statement of
financial condition. As the debt is repaid, shares are released from collateral
based on the proportion of debt service. Principal payments on the debt are
$17,500 per month for 120 months. The interest rate is adjusted annually to the
Wall Street Journal prime rate. Released shares are allocated to eligible
employees at the end of the plan year based on the employee's eligible
compensation to total compensation. The Corporation recognizes compensation
expense during the period as the shares are earned and committed to be released.
As shares are committed to be released and compensation expense is recognized,
the shares become outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share
computations. The amount of compensation expense reported by the Corporation is
equal to the average fair value of the shares earned and committed to be
released during the period.



Compensation expense that the Corporation recognized during the periods ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $66,000 and $52,000, respectively. The ESOP shares
as of March 31, 2005 were as follows:



March 31, 2005
--------------

Allocated shares 55,328
Estimated shares committed to be released 6,675
Unreleased shares 211,397
-----------
Total ESOP shares 273,400
===========

Fair value of unreleased shares $ 2,807,818
===========


The Corporation has established a stock incentive plan for directors and certain
key employees that provides for the granting of restricted stock and incentive
and nonqualified options to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of the Corporation's
common stock. The compensation committee of the Board determines the terms of
the restricted stock and options granted.

All options granted have a maximum term of ten years from the grant date, and
the option price per share of options granted cannot be less than the fair
market value of the Corporation's common stock on the grant date. All options
granted under this plan vest 20% on the grant date and an additional 20%
annually on the anniversary of the grant date.

In addition, the Corporation granted 1,423,940 options to the new management
team. These options have an exercise price of $8.17 per share. They have a ten
year term and a tiered vesting schedule as discussed in Note 24 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

The Corporation has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" (Statement 123) which allows an entity to continue to measure
compensation costs for those plans using the intrinsic value-based method of
accounting prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees." The Corporation has elected to follow APB Opinion 25 and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Accordingly,
compensation cost for fixed and variable stock-based awards is measured by the
excess, if any, of the fair market price of the underlying stock over the amount
the individual is required to pay. Compensation cost for fixed awards is
measured at the grant date, while compensation cost for variable awards is
estimated until both the number of shares an individual is entitled to receive
and the exercise or purchase price are known (measurement date). No option-based
employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted
had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock
on the date of grant. The pro forma information below was determined as if the
Corporation had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value
method of Statement 123. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated
fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting
period.



The Corporation's pro forma information follows (in thousands, except earnings
per share information):



For the three months ended
--------------------------
March 31, March 31,
2005 2004
---------- ----------

Net (loss) income:
As reported $ (8,016) $ 1,228
Pro forma (10,177) 919
(Loss) earnings per common share:
As reported $ (.44) $ .07
Pro forma (.55) .05
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:
As reported $ (.44) $ .07
Pro forma (.55) .05


The fair value of the options granted was based upon the Black-Scholes pricing
model. The Corporation used the following weighted average assumptions for the
quarter ended:



March 31,
--------------
2005 2004
---- ----

Risk free interest rate 4.34% 3.84%
Volatility factor .41 .32
Weighted average life of options 7.0 7.0
Dividend yield 0.00 0.00



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.

Basis of Presentation

The following is a discussion and analysis of our March 31, 2005 consolidated
financial condition and results of operations for the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2005 (first quarter of 2005) and 2004 (first quarter of 2004). All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Our
accounting and reporting policies conform to generally accepted accounting
principles.

This information should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this
report and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations", appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

Overview

Our principal subsidiary is The Bank, an Alabama-chartered financial institution
headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, which operates 26 banking offices in
Alabama and the eastern panhandle of Florida. Other subsidiaries include TBC
Capital Statutory Trust II ("TBC Capital II"), a Connecticut statutory trust,
TBC Capital Statutory Trust III ("TBC Capital III"), a Delaware business trust,
and Morris Avenue Management Group, Inc. ("MAMG"), an Alabama corporation, all
of which are wholly owned. TBC Capital II and TBC Capital III are unconsolidated
special purpose entities formed solely to issue cumulative trust preferred
securities. MAMG is a real estate management company that manages our
headquarters, our branch facilities and certain other real estate owned by The
Bank.

Our total assets were $1.427 billion at March 31, 2005, an increase of $3.7
million, or .26%, from $1.423 billion as of December 31, 2004. Our total loans,
net of unearned income, were $942 million at March 31, 2005, an increase of $7.5
million, or .80%, from $935 million as of December 31, 2004. Our total deposits
were $1.079 billion at March 31, 2005, an increase of $12.1 million, or 1.14%,
from $1.067 billion as of December 31, 2004. Our total stockholders' equity was
$99.1 million at March 31, 2005, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 1.39%, from
$100.5 million as of December 31, 2004.

On January 24, 2005, we announced that we had entered into a series of executive
management change agreements. These agreements set forth the employment of C.
Stanley Bailey as Chief Executive Officer and a director of the corporation and
chairman of our banking subsidiary, C. Marvin Scott as President of the
corporation and our banking subsidiary, and Rick D. Gardner as Chief Operating
Officer of the corporation and our banking subsidiary. These agreements also
provided for the purchase by Mr. Bailey, Mr. Scott and Mr. Gardner, along with
other investors, of 925,636 shares of common stock of the corporation at $8.17
per share. We also entered into agreements with James A. Taylor and James A.
Taylor, Jr. that would allow them continue to serve as Chairman of the Board of
the corporation and as a director of the corporation, respectively, but would
cease their employment as officers and directors of our banking subsidiary.

Under the agreement with Mr. Taylor, in lieu of the payments to which he would
have been entitled under his employment agreement, we paid to Mr. Taylor
$3,940,155 on January 24, 2005 and are scheduled to pay an additional $3,152,124
on January 24, 2006, and $788,031 on January 24, 2007. The agreement also
provides for the provision of certain insurance benefits to Mr. Taylor, the
transfer of a "key man" life insurance policy to Mr. Taylor, and the maintenance
of such policy by us for five years (with the cost of maintaining such policy
included in the above amounts), in each case substantially as required by his
employment agreement. This obligation to provide such payments and benefits to
Mr. Taylor is absolute and will survive the death or disability of Mr. Taylor.


Under the agreement with Mr. Taylor, Jr., in lieu of the payments to which he
would have been entitled under his employment agreement, we paid to Mr. Taylor,
Jr., $1,382,872 on January 24, 2005. The agreement also provides for the
provision of certain insurance benefits to Mr. Taylor, Jr. and for the immediate
vesting of his unvested incentive awards and deferred compensation in each case
substantially as required by his employment agreement. This obligation to
provide such payments and benefits to Mr. Taylor, Jr. is absolute and will
survive the death or disability of Mr. Taylor, Jr..

In connection with the above management separation transaction, we recognized
pre-tax expenses of $12.4 million in the first quarter of 2005. At March 31,
2005, we had $4.2 million of accrued liabilities related to these agreements.
See Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for further
information.

Management reviews the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly
basis. The provision for loan losses represents the amount determined by
management necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level
capable of absorbing inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Management's
determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, which is based
on the factors and risk identification procedures discussed in the following
pages, requires the use of judgments and estimates that may change in the
future. Changes in the factors used by management to determine the adequacy of
the allowance or the availability of new information could cause the allowance
for loan losses to be increased or decreased in future periods. In addition,
bank regulatory agencies, as part of their examination process, may require that
additions or reductions be made to the allowance for loan losses based on their
judgments and estimates.

Results of Operations

We incurred an $8.02 million net loss for the first quarter of 2005, compared to
$1.23 million net income for the first quarter of 2004. Basic and diluted net
(loss) income per common share was $(.44) and $.07, respectively, for the first
quarters of 2005 and 2004, based on weighted average shares outstanding for the
respective periods. Return on average assets, on an annualized basis, was
(2.27)% for the first quarter of 2005 compared to .41% for the first quarter of
2004. Return on average stockholders' equity, on an annualized basis, was
(32.21)% for the first quarter of 2005 compared to 4.91% for the first quarter
of 2004. Book value per share at March 31, 2005 was $4.96, compared to $5.31 as
of December 31, 2004. Tangible book value per share at March 31, 2005 was $4.30,
compared to $4.62 as of December 31, 2004.

The decrease in our net income during the first quarter of 2005 compared to the
first quarter of 2004 is the result of certain nonoperating charges related to
the management changes which occurred in the first quarter of 2005, the
recognition of losses in the bond portfolio and losses from the sale of certain
assets (see notes 3 and 4 in the condensed consolidated financial statements and
the noninterest income and noninterest expenses sections of management's
discussion and analysis).

Net interest income is the difference between the income earned on
interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities used
to support such assets. Net interest income increased $682,000, or 7.64%, to
$9.6 million for the first quarter of 2005 compared to $8.9 million for the
first quarter of 2004. Net interest income increased primarily due to a $2.7
million increase in total interest income offset by a $2.0 increase in total
interest expense. The increase in total interest income is primarily due to a
$95.6 million increase in the average volume of loans and a $121.4 million
increase in the average volume of investment securities.

The increase in total interest expense is attributable to a 24 basis point
increase in the average interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities and a
$207 million increase in the volume of average interest-bearing liabilities. The
average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 2.84% for the first
quarter of 2005, compared to 2.60% for the first quarter of 2004. Our net
interest spread and net interest margin were 2.94% and 3.06%, respectively, for
the first quarter of 2005, compared to 3.22% and 3.35% for the first quarter of
2004.



Average interest-earning assets for the first quarter of 2005 increased $206
million, or 19.2%, to $1.277 billion from $1.071 billion in the first quarter of
2004. This increase in average interest-earning assets was offset by a $208
million, or 20.4%, increase in average interest-bearing liabilities, to $1.224
billion for the first quarter of 2005 from $1.016 billion for the first quarter
of 2004. The ratio of average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities was 104.4% and 105.4% for the first quarters of
2005 and 2004, respectively. Average interest-bearing assets produced a taxable
equivalent yield of 5.78% for the first quarter of 2005 compared to 5.82% for
the first quarter of 2004.

Average Balances, Income, Expense and Rates. The following table depicts, on a
taxable equivalent basis for the periods indicated, certain information related
to our average balance sheet and average yields on assets and average costs of
liabilities. Average yields are calculated by dividing income or expense by the
average balance of the corresponding assets or liabilities. Average balances
have been calculated on a daily basis.



THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 2004
----------------------------------- ----------------------------------
AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/ AVERAGE INCOME/ YIELD/
BALANCE EXPENSE RATE BALANCE EXPENSE RATE
------------ ----------- ------ ------------- ----------- ------
(Dollars in thousands)

ASSETS
Interest-earning assets:
Loans, net of unearned income(1)................... $ 953,891 $ 14,878 6.33% $ 858,225 $ 13,567 6.36%
Investment securities
Taxable.......................................... 276,595 2,925 4.29 160,538 1,713 4.29
Tax-exempt(2).................................... 6,632 88 5.38 1,316 23 7.03
------------ ----------- ------------- -----------
Total investment securities.................. 283,227 3,013 4.31 161,854 1,736 4.31
Federal funds sold............................... 13,589 82 2.45 14,440 34 .95
Other investments................................ 26,380 243 3.74 36,570 165 1.81
------------ ----------- ------------- -----------
Total interest-earning assets................ 1,277,087 18,216 5.78 1,071,089 15,502 5.82
Noninterest-earning assets:
Cash and due from banks............................ 27,483 25,832
Premises and equipment............................. 59,959 58,018
Accrued interest and other assets.................. 79,797 78,153
Allowance for loan losses.......................... (12,802) (25,492)
------------ -------------
Total assets................................. $ 1,431,524 $ 1,207,600
============ =============

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits.................................... $ 302,756 1,110 1.49 $ 237,751 681 1.15
Savings deposits................................... 28,214 11 0.16 30,397 13 0.17
Time deposits...................................... 658,162 4,916 3.03 544,141 3,583 2.65
Other borrowings................................... 202,603 1,857 3.69 172,047 1,666 3.89
Subordinated debentures........................... 31,959 685 8.69 31,959 626 7.88
------------ ----------- ------------- -----------
Total interest-bearing liabilities .......... 1,223,694 8,579 2.84 1,016,295 6,569 2.60
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits.................................... 95,483 81,250
Accrued interest and other liabilities ............ 11,429 9,468
Stockholders' equity............................... 100,918 100,587
------------ -------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity... $ 1,431,524 $ 1,207,600
============ =============
Net interest income/net interest spread.............. 9,637 2.94% 8,933 3.22%
==== ====
Net yield on earning assets.......................... 3.06% 3.35%
==== ====
Taxable equivalent adjustment:
Investment securities(2)........................... 30 8
----------- -----------
Net interest income.......................... $ 9,607 $ 8,925
=========== ===========


(1) Nonaccrual loans are included in loans, net of unearned income. No
adjustment has been made for these loans in the calculation of yields.

(2) Interest income and yields are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis
using a tax rate of 34 percent.



The following table sets forth, on a taxable equivalent basis, the effect which
the varying levels of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
and the applicable rates have had on changes in net interest income for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.



THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31 (1)
----------------------------------------
2005 VS. 2004
----------------------------------------
CHANGES DUE TO
INCREASE -------------------------
(DECREASE) RATE VOLUME
---------- ---------- ----------
(Dollars in thousands)

Increase (decrease) in:
Income from interest-earning assets:
Interest and fees on loans ............. $ 1,311 $ (69) $ 1,380
Interest on securities:
Taxable ........................... 1,212 - 1,212
Tax-exempt ........................ 65 (7) 72
Interest on federal funds .............. 48 50 (2)
Interest on other investments .......... 78 134 (56)
--------- --------- ---------
Total interest income ............. 2,714 108 2,606
--------- --------- ---------
Expense from interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest on demand deposits ............... 429 223 206
Interest on savings deposits .............. (2) (1) (1)
Interest on time deposits ................. 1,333 542 791
Interest on other borrowings .............. 191 (78) 269
Interest on subordinated debentures ....... 59 59 -
--------- --------- ---------
Total interest expense ............ 2,010 745 1,265
--------- --------- ---------
Net interest income ............... $ 704 $ (637) $ 1,341
========= ========= =========


- ------------------------
(1) The change in interest due to both rate and volume has been allocated to
volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute
dollar amounts of the changes in each.

Noninterest income. Noninterest income decreased $2.5 million, or 62.8%, to
$1.50 million for the first quarter of 2005 from $4.0 million for the first
quarter of 2004, primarily due to the $739,000 gain we realized on the sale of
our Morris branch during the first quarter of 2004 combined with the $909,000
loss we realized in 2005 in our investment securities portfolio. The investment
portfolio losses were realized as a result of a $50 million sale of bonds in the
investment portfolio that closed in April 2005. We reinvested the proceeds in
bonds intended to enhance the yield and cash flows of our investment securities
portfolio. The new investment securities will be classified as available for
sale. Service charges and fees on deposits decreased $279,000, or 20.1%, to $1.1
million in the first quarter of 2005 from $1.4 million in the first quarter of
2004. This decrease is primarily due to a loss of transaction accounts from 2004
to 2005. Management is currently pursuing new accounts and customers through
direct marketing and other promotional efforts to increase this source of
revenue. Mortgage banking income increased $42,000, or 10.4%, to $446,000 in the
first quarter of 2005 from $404,000 in the first quarter of 2004.

Noninterest expenses. Noninterest expenses increased $12.0 million, or 105.4%,
to $23.3 million for the first quarter of 2005 from $11.4 million for the first
quarter of 2004. This increase is primarily due to the management separation
costs of $12.4 million incurred in the first quarter of 2005. The management
separation charges primarily include severance payments, accelerated vesting of
restricted stock and professional fees (see note 3 in the condensed consolidated
financial statements). Salaries and benefits decreased $184,000, or 3.3%, to
$5.4 million for the first quarter of 2005 from $5.6 million for the first
quarter of 2004. Occupancy expenses decreased $183,000, or 8.5%, to $2.0 million
for the first quarter of 2005 from $2.2 million for the first quarter of 2004.
We also realized a $355,000 loss on the sale of our corporate aircraft in the
first quarter of 2005.

Income tax expense. An income tax benefit of $4.97 million was recognized for
the first quarter of 2005, compared to income tax expense of $319,000 for the
first quarter of 2004. The primary difference in the effective rate and the
federal statutory rate (34%) for the first quarter of 2005 and 2004 is due to
certain tax-exempt income from investments and insurance policies.



Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents the amount
determined by management necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at
a level capable of absorbing inherent losses in the loan portfolio. Management
reviews the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis. The
allowance for loan loss calculation is segregated into various segments that
include classified loans, loans with specific allocations and pass rated loans.
A pass rated loan is generally characterized by a very low to average risk of
default and in which management perceives there is a minimal risk of loss. Loans
are rated using an eight-point scale, with loan officers having the primary
responsibility for assigning risk ratings and for the timely reporting of
changes in the risk ratings. These processes, and the assigned risk ratings, are
subject to review by our internal loan review function and senior management.
Based on the assigned risk ratings, the criticized and classified loans in the
portfolio are segregated into the following regulatory classifications: Special
Mention, Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. Generally, regulatory reserve
percentages are applied to these categories to estimate the amount of loan loss
allowance, adjusted for previously mentioned risk factors. Impaired loans are
reviewed specifically and separately under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards ("SFAS") Statement No. 114 to determine the appropriate reserve
allocation. Management compares the investment in an impaired loan with the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective
interest rate, the loan's observable market price, or the fair value of the
collateral, if the loan is collateral-dependent, to determine the specific
reserve allowance. Reserve percentages assigned to non-rated loans are based on
historical charge-off experience adjusted for other risk factors. To evaluate
the overall adequacy of the allowance to absorb losses inherent in our loan
portfolio, management considers historical loss experience based on volume and
types of loans, trends in classifications, volume and trends in delinquencies
and non-accruals, economic conditions and other pertinent information. Based on
future evaluations, additional provisions for loan losses may be necessary to
maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level. See "Financial
Condition -- Allowance for Loan Losses" for additional discussion.

The provision for loan losses was $750,000 for the first quarter of 2005. We did
not record a provision for loan loss in the first quarter of 2004. During the
first quarter of 2005, we had net charged-off loans totaling $336,000, compared
to net charged-off loans of $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2004. The
annualized ratio of net charged-off loans to average loans was .14% in the first
quarter of 2005, compared to 1.20% for the first quarter of 2004 and 1.52% for
the year 2004. The allowance for loan losses totaled $13.0 million, or 1.37% of
loans, net of unearned income at March 31, 2005, compared to $12.5 million, or
1.34% of loans, net of unearned income, at December 31, 2004. See "Financial
Condition - Allowance for Loan Losses" for additional discussion.

Financial Condition

Total assets were $1.427 billion at March 31, 2005, an increase of $4 million,
or .26%, from $1.423 billion as of December 31, 2004. Average total assets for
the first quarter of 2005 were $1.432 billion, which was supported by average
total liabilities of $1.331 billion and average total stockholders' equity of
$101 million.



Short-term liquid assets. Short-term liquid assets (cash and due from banks,
interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold) decreased $5.3
million, or 11.6%, to $40.6 million at March 31, 2005 from $45.9 million at
December 31, 2004. At March 31, 2005, short-term liquid assets comprised 2.9% of
total assets, compared to 3.2% at December 31, 2004. We continually monitor our
liquidity position and will increase or decrease our short-term liquid assets as
we deem necessary.

Investment Securities. Total investment securities decreased $23.7 million, or
8.2%, to $264.6 million at March 31, 2005, from $288.3 million at December 31,
2004. Mortgage-backed securities, which comprised 21.7% of the total investment
portfolio at March 31, 2005, decreased $3.3 million, or 5.4%, to $57.3 million
from $60.6 million at December 31, 2004. Investments in U.S. agency securities,
which comprised 58.5% of the total investment portfolio at March 31, 2005,
decreased $25.1 million, or 14.0 %, to $154.7 million from $179.8 million at
December 31, 2004. During the first quarter of 2005, we had a $50 million sale
of bonds in the investment portfolio that closed in April 2005. We reinvested
the proceeds in bonds intended to enhance the yield and cash flows of our
investment securities portfolio. The new investment securities will be
classified as available for sale. The total investment portfolio at March 31,
2005 comprised 21.6% of all interest-earning assets compared to 22.8% at
December 31, 2004 and produced an average taxable equivalent yield of 4.3% for
the first quarter of 2005 and 2004.

Loans. Loans, net of unearned income, totaled $942.4 million at March 31, 2005,
an increase of .80%, or $7.5 million, from $934.9 million at December 31, 2004.
Mortgage loans held for sale totaled $22.0 million at March 31, 2005, an
increase of $13.9 million from $8.1 million at December 31, 2004. Average loans,
including mortgage loans held for sale, totaled $953.9 million for the first
quarter of 2005 compared to $858.2 million for the first quarter of 2004. Loans,
net of unearned income, comprised 75.01% of interest-earning assets at March 31,
2005, compared to 73.88% at December 31, 2004. Mortgage loans held for sale
comprised 1.75% of interest-earning assets at March 31, 2005, compared to .6% at
December 31, 2004. The loan portfolio produced an average yield of 6.3% for the
first quarter of 2005, compared to 6.4% for the first quarter of 2004. The
following table details the distribution of the loan portfolio by category as of
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:

DISTRIBUTION OF LOANS BY CATEGORY



MARCH 31, 2005 DECEMBER 31, 2004
----------------------- -----------------------
PERCENT OF PERCENT OF
AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT TOTAL
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Commercial and industrial........................... $ 135,495 14.3% $ 131,979 14.1%
Real estate -- construction and land development ... 272,319 28.9 249,188 26.6
Real estate -- mortgage
Single-family ................................... 230,863 24.5 250,718 26.8
Commercial....................................... 248,282 26.3 242,279 25.9
Other............................................ 25,814 2.7 25,745 2.7
Consumer............................................ 24,484 2.6 28,431 3.0
Other............................................... 6,636 .7 8,045 .9
------- ----- ---------- -----
Total loans............................... 943,893 100.0% 936,385 100.0%
===== =====
Unearned income..................................... (1,502) (1,517)
Allowance for loan losses........................... (12,957) (12,543)
---------- ----------
Net loans................................. $ 929,434 $ 922,325
========== ==========


Deposits. Noninterest-bearing deposits totaled $93.5 million at March 31, 2005,
an increase of 4.5%, or $4.0 million, from $89.5 million at December 31, 2004.
Noninterest-bearing deposits comprised 8.7% of total deposits at March 31, 2005,
compared to 8.4% at December 31, 2004. Of total noninterest-bearing deposits
$69.0 million, or 73.8%, were in the Alabama branches while $24.5 million, or
26.2%, were in the Florida branches.

Interest-bearing deposits totaled $985.8 million at March 31, 2005, an increase
of .83%, or $8.1 million, from $977.7 million at December 31, 2004.
Interest-bearing deposits averaged $989.1 million for the first quarter of



2005 compared to $812.2 million for the first quarter of 2004. The average rate
paid on all interest-bearing deposits during the first quarter of 2005 was 2.5%,
compared to 2.1% for the first quarter of 2004. Of total interest-bearing
deposits, $731.1 million, or 74.2%, were in the Alabama branches while $254.7
million, or 25.8%, were in the Florida branches.

Borrowings. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") totaled $146.1
million at March 31, 2005 and $156.1 million at December 31, 2004. Borrowings
from the FHLB were used primarily to fund growth in the loan portfolio and have
a weighted average rate of approximately 4.04% at March 31, 2005. The advances
are secured by FHLB stock, agency securities and a blanket lien on certain
residential real estate loans and commercial loans. The FHLB has issued for the
benefit of our banking subsidiary a $20,000,000 irrevocable letter of credit in
favor of the Chief Financial Officer of the State of Florida to secure certain
deposits of the State of Florida. The letter of credit expires January 6, 2006
upon sixty days' prior notice; otherwise, it will automatically extend for a
successive one-year term.

Junior Subordinated Debentures. We have sponsored two trusts, TBC Capital
Statutory Trust II ("TBC Capital II") and TBC Capital Statutory Trust III ("TBC
Capital III"), of which we own 100% of the common. The trusts were formed for
the purpose of issuing mandatory redeemable trust preferred securities to
third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of such trust
preferred securities solely in our junior subordinated debt securities (the
debentures). The debentures held by each trust are the sole assets of that
trust. Distributions on the trust preferred securities issued by each trust are
payable semi-annually at a rate per annum equal to the interest rate being
earned by the trust on the debentures held by that trust. The trust preferred
securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon
repayment of the debentures. We have entered into agreements which, taken
collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantee the trust preferred securities
subject to the terms of each of the guarantees. The debentures held by the TBC
Capital II and TBC Capital III capital trusts are first redeemable, in whole or
in part, by us on September 7, 2010 and July 25, 2006, respectively.

The trust preferred securities held by the trusts qualify as Tier 1 capital
under Federal Reserve Board guidelines.

Consolidated debt obligations related to subsidiary trusts holding solely our
debentures follow:



March 31, 2005 December 31, 2004
-------------- -----------------
(In thousands)

10.6% junior subordinated debentures owed to TBC
Capital Statutory Trust II due September 7, 2030 $ 15,464 $ 15,464
6-month LIBOR plus 3.75% junior subordinated debentures
owed to TBC Capital Statutory Trust III due July 25, 2031 16,495 16,495
-------- --------
Total junior subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated
subsidiary trusts $ 31,959 $ 31,959
======== ========


As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the interest rate on the $16,495,000
subordinated debentures was 6.71% and 5.74%, respectively.

Currently, we must obtain regulatory approval prior to paying any dividends on
these trust preferred securities. The Federal Reserve approved the timely
payment of our semi-annual distributions on our trust preferred securities in
January and March, 2005.

Allowance for Loan Losses. We maintain an allowance for loan losses within a
range we believe is adequate to absorb estimated losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. We prepare a quarterly analysis to assess the risk in the



loan portfolio and to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
Generally, we estimate the allowance using specific reserves for impaired loans,
and other factors, such as historical loss experience based on volume and types
of loans, trends in classifications, volume and trends in delinquencies and
non-accruals, economic conditions and other pertinent information. The level of
allowance for loan losses to net loans will vary depending on the quarterly
analysis.

We manage and control risk in the loan portfolio through adherence to credit
standards established by the board of directors and implemented by senior
management. These standards are set forth in a formal loan policy, which
establishes loan underwriting and approval procedures, sets limits on credit
concentration and enforces regulatory requirements. In addition, we have engaged
Credit Risk Management, LLC, an independent loan review firm, to supplement our
existing independent loan review function.

Loan portfolio concentration risk is reduced through concentration limits for
borrowers, collateral types and geographic diversification. Concentration risk
is measured and reported to senior management and the board of directors on a
regular basis.

The allowance for loan loss calculation is segregated into various segments that
include classified loans, loans with specific allocations and pass rated loans.
A pass rated loan is generally characterized by a very low to average risk of
default and in which management perceives there is a minimal risk of loss. Loans
are rated using an eight-point scale, with the loan officer having the primary
responsibility for assigning risk ratings and for the timely reporting of
changes in the risk ratings. These processes, and the assigned risk ratings, are
subject to review by our internal loan review function and senior management.
Based on the assigned risk ratings, the criticized and classified loans in the
portfolio are segregated into the following regulatory classifications: Special
Mention, Substandard, Doubtful or Loss. Generally, regulatory reserve
percentages (5%, Special Mention; 15%, Substandard; 50%, Doubtful; 100%, Loss)
are applied to these categories to estimate the amount of loan loss allowance
required, adjusted for previously mentioned risk factors.

Pursuant to SFAS No. 114, impaired loans are specifically reviewed loans for
which it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according
to the terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is measured by comparing the
recorded investment in the loan with the present value of expected future cash
flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, at the loan's observable
market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral
dependent. A valuation allowance is provided to the extent that the measure of
the impaired loans is less than the recorded investment. A loan is not
considered impaired during a period of delay in payment if we continue to expect
that all amounts due will ultimately be collected. Larger groups of homogenous
loans such as consumer installment and residential real estate mortgage loans
are collectively evaluated for impairment.

Reserve percentages assigned to pass rated homogeneous loans are based on
historical charge-off experience adjusted for current trends in the portfolio
and other risk factors.

As stated above, risk ratings are subject to independent review by internal loan
review, which also performs ongoing, independent review of the risk management
process. The risk management process includes underwriting, documentation and
collateral control. Loan review is centralized and independent of the lending
function. The loan review results are reported to the Audit Committee of the
board of directors and senior management. We have also established a centralized
loan administration services department to serve our entire bank. This
department will provide standardized oversight for compliance with loan approval
authorities and bank lending policies and procedures, as well as centralized
supervision, monitoring and accessibility.



The following table summarizes certain information with respect to our allowance
for loan losses and the composition of charge-offs and recoveries for the
periods indicated.

SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE



THREE-MONTH
PERIOD ENDED YEAR ENDED
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2005 2004
------------ ------------
(Dollars in thousands)

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period ... $ 12,543 $ 25,174
Charge-offs:
Commercial and industrial.......................... 41 7,690
Real estate -- construction and land development... 1 765
Real estate -- mortgage
Single-family.................................. 87 1,012
Commercial..................................... 210 5,820
Other.......................................... - 86
Consumer........................................... 125 1,881
Other.............................................. 91 87
---------- ----------
Total charge-offs.......................... 555 17,341
Recoveries:
Commercial and industrial.......................... 82 1,468
Real estate -- construction and land development... 10 4
Real estate -- mortgage
Single-family.................................. 29 470
Commercial..................................... 1 737
Other.......................................... 10 97
Consumer........................................... 48 549
Other.............................................. 39 410
---------- ----------
Total recoveries........................... 219 3,735
---------- ----------
Net charge-offs...................................... 336 13,606

Provision for loan losses 750 975
---------- ----------

Allowance for loan losses at end of period........... $ 12,957 $ 12,543
========== ==========

Loans at end of period, net of unearned income....... $ 942,391 $ 934,868
Average loans, net of unearned income................ 953,891 894,406
Ratio of ending allowance to ending loans............ 1.37% 1.34%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans(1)......... 0.14% 1.52%
Net charge-offs as a percentage of:
Provision for loan losses 44.8% 1395.49%
Allowance for loan losses(1) 10.52% 108.47%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage
of nonperforming loans............................. 183.97% 169.36%


(1) Annualized.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans, net of unearned income,
at March 31, 2005 was 1.37%, compared to 1.34% as of December 31, 2004. The
allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans increased to
183.97% at March 31, 2005 from 169.36% at December 31, 2004.

Net charge-offs were $336,000 for the first quarter of 2005. Net charge-offs to
average loans on an annualized basis totaled 0.14% for the first quarter of
2005. Net commercial real estate loan charge-offs totaled $209,000, or 62.2% of
total net charge-off loans, for the first quarter of 2005 compared to 37.4% of
total net charge-off loans for the year 2004. Net single family real estate loan
charge-offs totaled $58,000, or 17.3% of total net charge-off loans, for the
first quarter of 2005 compared to 4.0% of total net charge-off loans for the
year 2004. Net consumer loan charge-offs totaled $77,000, or 22.9% of total net
charge-off loans, for the first quarter of 2005 compared with 9.8% of total net
charge-off loans for the year 2004.



Nonperforming Assets. Nonperforming assets decreased $2.4 million, to $10.0
million as of March 31, 2005 from $12.4 million as of December 31, 2004. As a
percentage of net loans plus nonperforming assets, nonperforming assets
decreased from 1.32% at December 31, 2004 to 1.06% at March 31, 2005. The
following table represents our nonperforming assets for the dates indicated.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS




MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2005 2004
-------------- -----------------
(Dollars in Thousands)

Nonaccrual................................................................. $ 7,014 $ 6,344
Accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent.................................. 29 431
Restructured............................................................... - 631
--------- ---------
Total nonperforming loans............................................ 7,043 7,406
Other real estate owned.................................................... 2,971 4,906
Repossessed assets......................................................... 4 103
--------- ---------
Total nonperforming assets........................................... $ 10,018 $ 12,415
========= =========

Nonperforming loans as a percent of loans.................................. .75% .79%
========= =========

Nonperforming assets as a percent of loans plus nonperforming assets....... 1.06% 1.32%
========= =========


Loans past due 30 days or more, net of non-accruals, improved to .54% at March
31, 2005 from .88% at December 31, 2004.

The following is a summary of nonperforming loans by category for the dates
shown:



MARCH 31 DECEMBER 31,
2005 2004
--------- ------------
(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial and industrial........................... $ 1,636 $ 2,445
Real estate -- construction and land development.... 229 187
Real estate -- mortgages
Single-family.................................. 1,926 2,060
Commercial..................................... 2,961 2,273
Other.......................................... 127 183
Consumer............................................ 164 250
Other............................................... - 8
--------- ---------
Total nonperforming loans................. $ 7,043 $ 7,406
========= =========


A delinquent loan is placed on nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days or more
past due and management believes, after considering economic and business
conditions and collection efforts, that the borrower's financial condition is
such that the collection of interest is doubtful. When a loan is placed on
nonaccrual status, all interest which has been accrued on the loan during the
current period but remains unpaid is reversed and deducted from earnings as a
reduction of reported interest income; any prior period accrued and unpaid
interest is reversed and charged against the allowance for loan losses. No
additional interest income is accrued on the loan balance until the collection
of both principal and interest becomes reasonably certain. When a problem loan
is finally resolved, there may ultimately be an actual write-down or charge-off
of the principal balance of the loan to the allowance for loan losses, which may
necessitate additional charges to earnings.



Impaired Loans. At March 31, 2005, the recorded investment in impaired loans
under FAS 114 totaled $5.4 million, with approximately $1.9 million in allowance
for loan losses specifically allocated to impaired loans. This represents an
increase of $300,000 from $5.1 million at December 31, 2004. The following is a
summary of impaired loans and the specifically allocated allowance for loan
losses by category as of March 31, 2005:



OUTSTANDING SPECIFIC
BALANCE ALLOWANCE
----------- ---------

Commercial and industrial........................... $ 2,253 $ 1,097
Real estate -- construction and land development.... 229 57
Real estate -- mortgages............................
Commercial..................................... 2,762 686
Other.......................................... 113 19
--------- ---------
Total..................................... $ 5,357 $ 1,859
========= =========


Potential Problem Loans. In addition to nonperforming loans, management has
identified $140,000 in potential problem loans as of March 31, 2005 compared to
$2.4 million as of December 31, 2004. Potential problem loans are loans where
known information about possible credit problems of the borrowers causes
management to have doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the
present repayment terms and may result in disclosure of such loans as
nonperforming.

Stockholders' Equity. At March 31, 2005, total stockholders' equity was $99.1
million, a decrease of $1.4 million from $100.5 million at December 31, 2004.
The decrease in stockholders' equity during the first quarter of 2005 resulted
primarily from a net loss of $8.0 million offset by additional net proceeds of
$7.3 million resulting from the sale of 925,636 shares of our common stock at
$8.17 per share, the then current market price, to the new members of the
management team and other investors, in a private placement. As of March 31,
2005 we had 19,020,943 shares of common stock issued and 18,756,632 outstanding.
As of March 31, 2005, there were 52,914 shares held in treasury at a cost of
$368,000.

On April 1, 2002, we issued 157,500 shares of restricted common stock to certain
directors and key employees pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated 1998
Stock Incentive Plan. Under the Restricted Stock Agreements, the stock may not
be sold or assigned in any manner for a five-year period that began on April 1,
2002. During this restricted period, the participant is eligible to receive
dividends and exercise voting privileges. The restricted stock also has a
corresponding vesting period with one-third vesting at the end of each of the
third, fourth and fifth years. The restricted stock was issued at $7.00 per
share, or $1,120,000, and classified as a contra-equity account, "Unearned
restricted stock", in stockholders' equity. During 2003, 15,000 shares of this
restricted common stock were forfeited. On January 24, 2005, the Corporation
issued 49,375 additional shares of restricted common stock to certain key
employees. Under the terms of the management separation agreement entered into
during the first quarter of 2005, vesting was accelerated on 99,375 shares of
restricted stock. Restricted shares outstanding as of March 31, 2005 were 92,500
and the remaining amount in the unearned restricted stock account is $333,000.
This balance is being amortized as expense as the stock is earned during the
restricted period. The amounts of restricted shares are included in the diluted
earnings per share calculation, using the treasury stock method, until the
shares vest. Once vested, the shares become outstanding for basic earnings per
share. For the periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we recognized $519,000 and
$50,000, respectively, in restricted stock expense. Of the $519,000 expense in
2005, $486,000 is related to the accelerated vesting from the management
separation agreements and is included in the amount of management separation
cost.

We adopted a leveraged employee stock ownership plan (the "ESOP") effective May
15, 2002 that covers all eligible employees who are at least 21 years old and
have completed a year of service. As of March 31, 2005, the ESOP has been
leveraged with 273,400 shares of the our common stock purchased in the open
market and classified as a contra-equity account, "Unearned ESOP stock," in
stockholders' equity.



On January 29, 2003, the ESOP trustees finalized a $2,100,000 promissory note to
reimburse us for the funds used to leverage the ESOP. The unreleased shares and
our guarantee secure the promissory note, which has been classified as long-term
debt on our statement of financial condition. As the debt is repaid, shares are
released from collateral based on the proportion of debt service. Principal
payments on the debt are $17,500 per month for 120 months. The interest rate is
adjusted annually to the Wall Street Journal prime rate. Released shares are
allocated to eligible employees at the end of the plan year based on the
employee's eligible compensation to total compensation. We recognize
compensation expense during the period as the shares are earned and committed to
be released. As shares are committed to be released and compensation expense is
recognized, the shares become outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per
share computations. The amount of compensation expense we report is equal to the
average fair value of the shares earned and committed to be released during the
period. Compensation expense that we recognized during the periods ended March
31, 2005 and 2004 was $66,000 and $52,000, respectively. The ESOP shares as of
March 31, 2005 were as follows:



MARCH 31, 2005
--------------

Allocated shares 55,328
Estimated shares committed to be released 6,675
Unreleased shares 211,397
------------
Total ESOP shares 273,400
------------

Fair value of unreleased shares $ 2,807,818
============


Regulatory Capital. The table below represents our and our subsidiary's
regulatory and minimum regulatory capital requirements at March 31, 2005
(dollars in thousands):



FOR CAPITAL
ADEQUACY TO BE WELL
ACTUAL PURPOSES CAPITALIZED
------------------ ------------------ ------------------
AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO
---------- ----- ---------- ----- ---------- -----

Total Risk-Based Capital
Corporation $ 126,092 11.36% $ 88,760 8.00% $ 110,950 10.00%
The Bank 124,196 11.39% 87,244 8.00% 109,055 10.00%

Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital
Corporation 111,959 10.09% 44,380 4.00% 66,570 6.00%
The Bank 111,239 10.20% 43,622 4.00% 65,433 6.00%

Leverage Capital
Corporation 111,959 7.93% 56,483 4.00% 70,604 5.00%
The Bank 111,239 8.00% 55,610 4.00% 69,512 5.00%




Liquidity

Our principal sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on
loans, federal funds sold and maturities and sales of investment securities. In
addition to these sources of liquidity, we have access to purchased funds from
several regional financial institutions, brokered and internet deposits, and may
borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank under a blanket floating lien on certain
commercial loans and residential real estate loans. Also, we have established
certain repurchase agreements with a large financial institution. While
scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively predictable,
interest rates, general economic conditions and competition primarily influence
deposit flows and early loan payments. Management places constant emphasis on
the maintenance of adequate liquidity to meet conditions that might reasonably
be expected to occur. Management believes it has established sufficient sources
of funds to meet its anticipated liquidity needs.

Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for
forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf. Some of the disclosures
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including any statements preceded by,
followed by or which include the words "may," "could," "should," "will,"
"would," "hope," "might," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate,"
"intend," "plan," "assume" or similar expressions constitute forward-looking
statements.

These forward-looking statements, implicitly and explicitly, include the
assumptions underlying the statements and other information with respect to our
beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates,
intentions, financial condition, results of operations, future performance and
business, including our expectations and estimates with respect to our revenues,
expenses, earnings, return on equity, return on assets, efficiency ratio, asset
quality, the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and other financial data
and capital and performance ratios.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking
statements are reasonable, these statements involve risks and uncertainties
which are subject to change based on various important factors (some of which
are beyond our control). The following factors, among others, could cause our
financial performance to differ materially from our goals, plans, objectives,
intentions, expectations and other forward-looking statements: (1) the strength
of the United States economy in general and the strength of the regional and
local economies in which we conduct operations; (2) the effects of, and changes
in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate
policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; (3) inflation,
interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; (4) our ability to successfully
integrate the assets, liabilities, customers, systems and management we acquire
or merge into our operations; (5) our timely development of new products and
services in a changing environment, including the features, pricing and quality
compared to the products and services of our competitors; (6) the willingness of
users to substitute competitors' products and services for our products and
services; (7) the impact of changes in financial services policies, laws and
regulations, including laws, regulations and policies concerning taxes, banking,
securities and insurance, and the application thereof by regulatory bodies; (8)
our ability to resolve any legal proceeding on acceptable terms and its effect
on our financial condition or results of operations; (9) technological changes;
(10) changes in consumer spending and savings habits; and (11) regulatory, legal
or judicial proceedings.

If one or more of the factors affecting our forward-looking information and
statements proves incorrect, then our actual results, performance or
achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by,
forward-looking information and statements contained in this annual report.
Therefore, we caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking
information and statements.

We do not intend to update our forward-looking information and statements,
whether written or oral, to reflect change. All forward-looking statements
attributable to us are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.



ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK.

There have been no material changes in our quantitative or qualitative
disclosures about market risk as of March 31, 2005 from those presented in our
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

The information set forth under the caption "Item 7. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Market Risk-Interest
Rate Sensitivity" included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004, is hereby incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION

Appearing as exhibits to this report are Certifications of our Chief Executive
Officer ("CEO") and our Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"). The Certifications are
required to be made by Rule 13a - 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. This Item contains the information about the evaluation that is
referred to in the Certifications, and the information set forth below in this
Item 4 should be read in conjunction with the Certifications for a more complete
understanding of the Certifications.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

We conducted an evaluation (the "Evaluation") of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision
and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, as of
March 31, 2005. Based upon the Evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that,
as of March 31, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to
ensure that material information relating to The Banc Corporation and its
subsidiaries is made known to management, including the CEO and CFO,
particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared.
There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.



PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

While we are a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of business, we believe that there are no proceedings threatened or pending
against us at this time that will individually, or in the aggregate, materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We
believe that we have strong claims and defenses in each lawsuit in which we are
involved. While we believe that we will prevail in each lawsuit, there can be no
assurance that the outcome of the pending, or any future, litigation, either
individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or our results of operations.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None, other than as previously reported on Form 8-K.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

(a) Exhibit:

31.01 Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a).

31.02 Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 13a-14(a).

32.01 Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350.

32.02 Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350.



SIGNATURES

Pursuant with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

The Banc Corporation
(Registrant)

Date: May 10, 2005 By: /s/ C. Stanley Bailey
----------------------------
C. Stanley Bailey
Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 10, 2005 By: /s/ David R. Carter
------------------------
David R. Carter
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)