UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005
Commission File No: 000-31225
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
Tennessee | 62-1812853 | |
(State or jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
incorporation or organization) |
The Commerce Center, 211 Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee 37201
(Address of principal executive offices)
(615) 744-3700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address
and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes x No o
As of April 30, 2005, there were 8,397,601 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, issued and outstanding.
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
Report on Form 10-Q
March 31, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) may from time to time make written or oral statements, including statements contained in this report which may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). The words expect, anticipate, intend, consider, plan, believe, seek, should, estimate, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements should be considered subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are made based upon managements belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Pinnacle Financials actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Such factors are described below and in addition to those set out in Pinnacle Financials Form 10-K include, without limitation, (i) unanticipated deterioration in the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant increases in loan losses and provisions for those losses, (ii) increased competition with other financial institutions, (iii) lack of sustained growth in the economy in the Nashville, Tennessee area, (iv) rapid fluctuations or unanticipated changes in interest rates, (v) the inability of our bank subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank to satisfy regulatory requirements for its expansion plans, and (vi) changes in the legislative and regulatory environment, including compliance with the various provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Many of such factors are beyond Pinnacle Financials ability to control or predict, and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Pinnacle Financial does not intend to update or reissue any forward-looking statements contained in this report as a result of new information or other circumstances that may become known to Pinnacle Financial.
Page 2
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and noninterest-bearing due from banks |
$ | 19,956,737 | $ | 15,243,796 | ||||
Interest-bearing due from banks |
444,090 | 379,047 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
24,528,028 | 11,122,944 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
44,928,855 | 26,745,787 | ||||||
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
174,646,784 | 180,573,820 | ||||||
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $26,723,605
and $27,134,913 at March 31, 2005 and December
31, 2004, respectively) |
27,576,457 | 27,596,159 | ||||||
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
2,837,900 | 1,634,900 | ||||||
Loans |
516,733,302 | 472,362,219 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
(6,197,895 | ) | (5,650,014 | ) | ||||
Loans, net |
510,535,407 | 466,712,205 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
11,582,991 | 11,130,671 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiary and other
entities |
3,929,811 | 3,907,807 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
3,124,989 | 2,639,548 | ||||||
Other assets |
8,272,424 | 6,198,553 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 787,435,618 | $ | 727,139,450 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand |
$ | 119,212,181 | $ | 114,318,024 | ||||
Interest-bearing demand |
57,112,842 | 51,751,320 | ||||||
Savings and money market accounts |
207,534,995 | 199,058,240 | ||||||
Time |
235,160,749 | 205,599,425 | ||||||
Total deposits |
619,020,767 | 570,727,009 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
46,388,184 | 31,927,860 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
51,500,000 | 53,500,000 | ||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310,000 | 10,310,000 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
937,207 | 769,300 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
1,622,480 | 2,025,106 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
729,778,638 | 669,259,275 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $1.00; 40,000,000 shares
authorized; 8,391,371 issued and outstanding
at March 31, 2005 and 8,389,232 issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
8,391,371 | 8,389,232 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
44,388,278 | 44,376,307 | ||||||
Unearned compensation |
(29,750 | ) | (37,250 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
6,906,776 | 5,127,023 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net |
(1,999,695 | ) | 24,863 | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
57,656,980 | 57,880,175 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 787,435,618 | $ | 727,139,450 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 3
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||
Loans, including fees |
$ | 6,954,365 | $ | 3,946,572 | ||||
Securities: |
||||||||
Taxable |
2,021,783 | 1,550,859 | ||||||
Tax-exempt |
201,424 | 85,975 | ||||||
Federal funds sold and other |
92,162 | 82,716 | ||||||
Total interest income |
9,269,734 | 5,666,122 | ||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||
Deposits |
2,153,961 | 1,171,188 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
150,262 | 9,293 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings |
462,537 | 333,349 | ||||||
Total interest expense |
2,766,761 | 1,513,830 | ||||||
Net interest income |
6,502,973 | 4,152,292 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
601,250 | 353,848 | ||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
5,901,723 | 3,798,444 | ||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
261,700 | 163,845 | ||||||
Investment sales commissions |
437,424 | 389,579 | ||||||
Gain on loans and loan participations sold, net |
160,555 | 219,620 | ||||||
Gain on sales of investment securities, net |
114,410 | 248,353 | ||||||
Other noninterest income |
203,710 | 110,042 | ||||||
Total noninterest income |
1,177,799 | 1,131,439 | ||||||
Noninterest expense: |
||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
2,970,558 | 2,173,425 | ||||||
Equipment and occupancy |
784,026 | 505,690 | ||||||
Marketing and other business development |
113,168 | 149,158 | ||||||
Postage and supplies |
135,538 | 99,138 | ||||||
Other noninterest expense |
577,584 | 391,468 | ||||||
Total noninterest expense |
4,580,874 | 3,318,879 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
2,498,648 | 1,611,014 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
718,895 | 539,992 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,779,753 | $ | 1,071,022 | ||||
Per share information: |
||||||||
Basic net income per common share |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Diluted net income per common share |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.13 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
8,389,256 | 7,384,106 | ||||||
Diluted |
9,437,183 | 8,213,730 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 4
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
Retained | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Earnings | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid-in | Unearned | (Accumulated | Comprehensive | Stockholders' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Compensation | Deficit) | Income (Loss) | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2003 |
7,384,106 | $ | 7,384,106 | $ | 26,990,894 | $ | | $ | (189,155 | ) | $ | 150,536 | $ | 34,336,381 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 1,071,022 | | 1,071,022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding gains
on available-for-sale
securities, net of
deferred tax expense of
$533,648 |
| | | | | 858,884 | 858,884 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
1,930,106 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, March 31, 2004 |
7,384,106 | $ | 7,384,106 | $ | 26,990,894 | $ | | $ | 881,867 | $ | 1,009,420 | $ | 36,266,287 | |||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2004 |
8,389,232 | $ | 8,389,232 | $ | 44,376,307 | $ | (37,250 | ) | $ | 5,127,023 | $ | 24,863 | $ | 57,880,175 | ||||||||||||||
Exercise of employee incentive
common stock options |
2,139 | 2,139 | 11,971 | | | | 14,110 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of unearned
compensation associated with
restricted shares |
| | | 7,500 | | | 7,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 1,779,753 | | 1,779,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding losses
on available-for-sale
securities, net of
deferred tax benefit of
$1,240,860 |
| | | | | (2,024,558 | ) | (2,024,558 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
(223,195 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, March 31, 2005 |
8,391,371 | $ | 8,391,371 | $ | 44,388,278 | $ | (29,750 | ) | $ | 6,906,776 | $ | (1,999,695 | ) | $ | 57,656,980 | |||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 5
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,779,753 | $ | 1,071,022 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Net amortization of securities |
244,147 | 189,637 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
339,766 | 259,935 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
601,250 | 353,848 | ||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities, net |
(114,410 | ) | (248,353 | ) | ||||
Loss (gain) on participations sold |
14,991 | (121,617 | ) | |||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |
(331,494 | ) | (320,638 | ) | ||||
Mortgage loans held for sale: |
||||||||
Loans originated |
(21,360,167 | ) | (10,844,562 | ) | ||||
Loans sold |
20,157,167 | 8,369,840 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(740,234 | ) | 12,835 | |||||
Decrease in other liabilities |
(234,719 | ) | (1,979,888 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
356,050 | (3,257,941 | ) | |||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Activities in securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||
Purchases |
(10,285,511 | ) | (51,539,860 | ) | ||||
Sales |
6,791,867 | 21,876,953 | ||||||
Maturities, prepayments and calls |
6,045,226 | 9,012,617 | ||||||
Net increase in loans |
(44,424,452 | ) | (26,441,559 | ) | ||||
Purchases of premises and equipment and software |
(1,046,404 | ) | (219,717 | ) | ||||
Purchases of other assets |
(21,900 | ) | (289,800 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(42,941,174 | ) | (47,601,366 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
48,293,758 | 47,031,755 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
14,460,324 | (350,928 | ) | |||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank: |
||||||||
Issuances |
12,000,000 | 4,000,000 | ||||||
Payments |
(14,000,000 | ) | (8,000,000 | ) | ||||
Exercise of common stock options |
14,110 | | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
60,768,192 | 42,680,827 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
18,183,068 | (8,178,480 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
26,745,787 | 47,184,050 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 44,928,855 | $ | 39,005,570 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 6
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) was formed on February 28, 2000 (inception) and is a bank holding company whose primary business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank (Pinnacle National). Pinnacle National is a commercial bank located in Nashville, Tennessee. Pinnacle National provides a full range of banking services in its primary market area of Davidson County and the surrounding counties. Pinnacle National commenced its banking operations on October 27, 2000. PFP Title Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle National. PFP Title Company sells title insurance policies to Pinnacle National customers and others. PNFP Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PFP Title Company and is the parent of PNFP Properties, Inc., which was established as a Real Estate Investment Trust pursuant to Internal Revenue Service regulations. Pinnacle Community Development, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle National and is certified as a Community Development Entity by the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund of the United States Department of the Treasury. PNFP Statutory Trust I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle Financial, was created for the exclusive purpose of issuing capital trust preferred securities. Pinnacle Advisory Services, Inc. was established as a registered investment advisor pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Pinnacle Credit Enhancement Holdings, Inc. was established as a holding company to own a 24.5% membership interest in Collateral Plus, LLC. Collateral Plus, LLC serves as an intermediary between investors and borrowers in certain financial transactions whereby the borrowers require enhanced collateral in the form of letters of credit issued by the investors for the benefit of banks and other financial institutions.
Basis of Presentation These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pinnacle Financial and its subsidiaries. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation, other than the accounts of PNFP Statutory Trust I which are included in these consolidated financial statements pursuant to the equity method of accounting.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Pinnacle Financials Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses.
Cash and Cash Flows Cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks, Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, with original maturities within ninety days, are included in cash and cash equivalents. The following supplemental cash flow information addresses certain cash payments and noncash transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 as follows:
Page 7
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the three months ended March 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Cash Payments: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 2,598,854 | $ | 1,439,283 | ||||
Income taxes |
690,000 | 1,226,817 | ||||||
Noncash Transactions: |
||||||||
Transfers of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity |
| 27,655,669 | ||||||
Loans charged-off to the allowance for loan losses |
67,777 | 32,489 | ||||||
Loans foreclosed upon with repossessions transferred to
other assets |
34,750 | |
Income Per Common Share Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted. The difference between basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding was attributable to common stock options and warrants.
As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, there were common stock options outstanding to purchase up to 1,211,393 and 1,010,490 common shares, respectively. Substantially all of these shares have exercise prices, which when considered in relation to the average market price of Pinnacle Financials common stock for the respective reporting period, are considered dilutive and are considered in Pinnacle Financials diluted income per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. Additionally, as of March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial had dilutive warrants outstanding to purchase 406,000 common shares which have also been considered in the calculation of Pinnacle Financials diluted income per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
The following is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Basic earnings per share calculation: |
||||||||
Numerator Net income |
$ | 1,779,753 | $ | 1,071,022 | ||||
Denominator Average common shares outstanding |
8,389,256 | 7,384,106 | ||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share calculation: |
||||||||
Numerator Net income |
$ | 1,779,753 | $ | 1,071,022 | ||||
Denominator Average common shares outstanding |
8,389,256 | 7,384,106 | ||||||
Dilutive shares contingently issuable |
1,047,927 | 829,624 | ||||||
Average dilutive common shares outstanding |
9,437,183 | 8,213,730 | ||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.13 |
On April 20, 2004, the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Financial approved a two for one stock split of the Companys common stock payable as a 100% stock dividend on May 10, 2004 to shareholders of record on April 30, 2004. Pinnacle Financial has retroactively applied the impact of this stock split in these consolidated financial statements.
Stock-Based Compensation Pinnacle Financial applies APB Opinion 25 and related interpretations in accounting for the equity incentive plans. All option grants carry exercise prices equal to or above the fair value of the common stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized. Had compensation cost for Pinnacle Financials equity incentive plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plans consistent with the method prescribed in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Pinnacle Financials net income per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
Page 8
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 1,779,753 | $ | 1,071,022 | ||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation
expense determined under the fair
value based method for all awards,
net of related tax effects |
(111,072 | ) | (66,620 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 1,668,681 | $ | 1,004,402 | ||||||||
Per share information: |
||||||||||||
Basic net income |
As reported | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.15 | |||||||
Pro forma | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
Diluted net income |
As reported | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.13 | |||||||
Pro forma | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.12 |
For purposes of these calculations, the fair value of options granted for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Risk free interest rate |
2.26 | % | 1.00 | % | ||||
Expected life of the options |
5.0 years | 5.0 years | ||||||
Expected dividend yield |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
39.3 | % | 26.7 | % | ||||
Weighted average fair value |
$ | 9.00 | $ | 6.30 |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether impairment is other-than-temporary, and measurement of an impairment loss. An investment is considered impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost. Generally, an impairment is considered other-than-temporary unless: (i) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment; and (ii) evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. If impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss should be recognized equal to the difference between the investments cost and its fair value. Certain disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 were adopted in 2003 and Pinnacle Financial began presenting the new disclosure requirements in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. The recognition and measurement provisions were initially effective for other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. However, in September 2004, the effective date of these provisions was delayed until the finalization of a FASB Staff Position (FSP) to provide additional implementation guidance. Due to the recognition and measurement provisions being suspended and the final rule delayed, Pinnacle Financial is not able to determine whether the adoption of these new provisions will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of income.
Statement of Position 03-03, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-03) addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investors initial investment in loans or debt securities (loans) acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in purchase business combinations and applies to all nongovernmental entities, including not-for-profit organizations. The SOP does not apply to loans originated by the entity. The SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. Early adoption is encouraged. Specific transition guidance applies to certain loans that currently are within the scope of Practice Bulletin 6, Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans. Adoption did not have a material impact on the 2005 consolidated financial position or results of operations of Pinnacle Financial.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which revised SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. This statement supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The
Page 9
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
revised statement addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees and other third parties, eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB 25 and requires that the compensation costs relating to such transactions be recognized in the consolidated statement of income. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission deferred implementation of SFAS No. 123R for registrants until the next fiscal year following June 15, 2005. Pinnacle Financial is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and will adopt it on January 1, 2006 as required.
Business Segments Pinnacle Financial operates in one business segment, commercial banking, and has no individually significant business segments.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Other comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under United States generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income. Currently, Pinnacle Financials other comprehensive income (loss) consists of unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, on available-for-sale securities.
Reclassifications Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income or loss during any period. In the statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, Pinnacle Financial has reclassified noninterest income previously reported as Fees from the origination of mortgage loans to Gain on loans and loan participations sold. Additionally, sales commission expenses associated with mortgage loan originations previously included in Compensation and employee benefits have been reclassified to offset mortgage origination fees included in noninterest income as Gain on loans and loan participations sold.
Note 2. Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of securities at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are summarized as follows:
March 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
25,906,973 | 4,087 | 420,757 | 25,490,303 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
134,838,692 | 55,446 | 2,850,607 | 132,043,531 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
15,085,023 | 18,005 | 210,328 | 14,892,700 | ||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
2,311,283 | | 91,033 | 2,220,250 | ||||||||||||
$ | 178,141,971 | $ | 77,538 | $ | 3,572,725 | $ | 174,646,784 | |||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
$ | 17,746,618 | $ | | $ | 548,643 | $ | 17,197,975 | ||||||||
State and municipal securities |
9,829,839 | | 304,209 | 9,525,630 | ||||||||||||
$ | 27,576,457 | $ | | $ | 852,852 | $ | 26,723,605 | |||||||||
December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
27,164,683 | 129,219 | 19,727 | 27,274,175 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
138,851,236 | 348,187 | 672,189 | 138,527,234 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
12,486,440 | 71,726 | 55,481 | 12,502,685 | ||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
2,314,831 | | 45,105 | 2,269,726 | ||||||||||||
$ | 180,817,190 | $ | 549,132 | $ | 792,502 | $ | 180,573,820 | |||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
$ | 17,746,555 | $ | 600 | $ | 298,605 | $ | 17,448,550 | ||||||||
State and municipal securities |
9,849,604 | | 163,241 | 9,686,363 | ||||||||||||
$ | 27,596,159 | $ | 600 | $ | 461,846 | $ | 27,134,913 | |||||||||
Page 10
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On March 31, 2004, Pinnacle National transferred approximately $27,656,000 of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity at fair value. The transfer consisted of substantially all of Pinnacle Nationals holdings of Tennessee municipal securities and several of its longer-term agency securities. The net unrealized gain on such securities as of the date of transfer was approximately $325,000. This amount is reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, and is being amortized over the remaining lives of the respective held-to-maturity securities. At March 31, 2005, the unamortized amount approximated $270,000.
Pinnacle Financial realized approximately $114,000 in net gains from the sale of $6,792,000 of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $248,000 in net gains on the sale of $21,877,000 of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2004. Gross realized gains amounted to $114,000 on the sale of $6.8 million of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2005. Gross realized gains amounted to $312,000 on the sale of $10.9 million of available-for-sale securities while gross realized losses amounted to $64,000 on the sale of $11.0 million of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
At March 31, 2005, approximately $148,004,000 of Pinnacle Financials securities portfolio was pledged to secure public fund deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
At March 31, 2005, included in securities were the following investments with unrealized losses. The information below classifies these investments according to the term of the unrealized loss of less than twelve months or twelve months or longer:
Investments With an | Investments With an | Total Investments at | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized Loss of | Unrealized Loss of | March 31, 2005 With | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | an Unrealized Loss | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
$ | 41,516,118 | $ | 969,400 | $ | | $ | | $ | 41,516,118 | $ | 969,400 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
109,258,581 | 2,338,024 | 14,254,851 | 512,584 | 123,513,432 | 2,850,608 | ||||||||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
16,187,448 | 467,610 | 1,058,491 | 46,927 | 17,245,939 | 514,537 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
1,753,451 | 68,505 | 466,800 | 22,527 | 2,220,251 | 91,032 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total temporarily-impaired securities |
$ | 168,715,597 | $ | 3,843,539 | $ | 15,780,142 | $ | 582,038 | $ | 184,495,740 | $ | 4,425,577 | ||||||||||||
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of Pinnacle Financial to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial had several issuances that had been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months. At March 31, 2005, the amortized cost of these securities was approximately $16,362,000 compared to a fair value of $15,780,000. Because the declines in fair value noted above were attributable to increases in interest rates and not attributable to credit quality and because Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
Page 11
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 3. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The composition of loans at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 is summarized as follows:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
$ | 122,639,178 | $ | 117,122,607 | ||||
Commercial real estate Construction |
24,455,961 | 8,427,763 | ||||||
Commercial Other |
200,053,947 | 189,456,385 | ||||||
Total Commercial |
347,149,086 | 315,006,755 | ||||||
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
145,675,571 | 126,907,581 | ||||||
Consumer real estate Construction |
8,380,235 | 14,990,739 | ||||||
Consumer Other |
15,528,410 | 15,457,144 | ||||||
Total Consumer |
169,584,216 | 157,355,464 | ||||||
Total Loans |
516,733,302 | 472,362,219 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(6,197,895 | ) | (5,650,014 | ) | ||||
Loans, net |
$ | 510,535,407 | $ | 466,712,205 | ||||
Using standard industry codes, Pinnacle Financial periodically analyzes its commercial loan portfolio to determine if a concentration of credit risk exists to any one or more industries. Pinnacle Financial has a meaningful credit exposure (loans outstanding plus unfunded lines of credit) to borrowers in the trucking industry and to operators of nonresidential buildings. Credit exposure to the trucking industry approximated $48.3 million and $43.1 million, while credit exposure to operators of nonresidential buildings approximated $33.1 million and $27.5 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Levels of exposure to these industry groups are periodically evaluated in order to determine if additional allowance allocations are warranted.
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and for the year ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 5,650,014 | $ | 3,718,598 | ||||
Charged-off loans |
(67,777 | ) | (1,032,378 | ) | ||||
Recovery of previously charged-off loans |
14,408 | 15,371 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
601,250 | 2,948,423 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 6,197,895 | $ | 5,650,014 | ||||
At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $5,942,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities of which $3,883,000 had been drawn upon. At December 31, 2004, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $6,565,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities, of which $4,437,000 had been drawn upon. The terms on these loans and extensions are on substantially the same terms customary for other persons for the type of loan involved.
At March 31, 2005 and 2004, Pinnacle Financial had certain impaired loans on nonaccruing interest status. The principal balance of these nonaccrual loans amounted to $561,000 and $86,000 at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In each case, at the date such loans were placed on nonaccrual, Pinnacle Financial reversed all previously accrued interest income against current year earnings. Had these loans been on accruing status, interest income would have been higher by $15,000 and $1,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Page 12
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 4. Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 consists of the following:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Current tax expense: |
||||||||
Federal |
$ | 989,854 | $ | 750,857 | ||||
State |
60,535 | 109,773 | ||||||
Total current tax expense |
1,050,389 | 860,630 | ||||||
Deferred tax expense: |
||||||||
Federal |
(275,561 | ) | (265,626 | ) | ||||
State |
(55,933 | ) | (55,012 | ) | ||||
Total deferred tax expense |
(331,494 | ) | (320,638 | ) | ||||
Total income tax expense |
$ | 718,895 | $ | 539,992 | ||||
Pinnacle Financials income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the Federal income tax statutory rates of 34% in 2005 and 2004 to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Income taxes at statutory rate |
$ | 849,540 | $ | 547,744 | ||||
State tax expense, net of federal tax effect |
107,192 | 69,112 | ||||||
Federal tax credits |
(75,000 | ) | | |||||
Tax-exempt municipal securities |
(53,349 | ) | (18,284 | ) | ||||
Other items |
(109,488 | ) | (58,580 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 718,895 | $ | 539,992 | ||||
The effective tax rate for Pinnacle Financial is impacted by Federal tax credits related to the New Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately $2.3 million in future Federal tax credits to be realized over the next seven years. Tax benefits related to these credits will be recognized for financial reporting purposes in the same periods that the credits are recognized in the Companys income tax returns. The credit that is available for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 is $300,000 in each year. Pinnacle Financial believes that it and its subsidiary will continue to comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New Markets Tax Credit program such that it will be able to claim the credit in its Federal income tax return in 2005 and 2004. Also, during 2004, Pinnacle National formed a real estate investment trust which provides Pinnacle Financial with an alternative vehicle for raising capital. Additionally, the ownership structure of this real estate investment trust provides certain income tax benefits to Pinnacle National and Pinnacle Financial.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that Pinnacle Financial will realize the benefit of these deductible differences.
Page 13
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The components of deferred income taxes included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are as follows:
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Loan loss allowance |
$ | 2,374,212 | $ | 2,162,332 | ||||
Securities |
1,225,620 | | ||||||
Other assets |
151,599 | 136,790 | ||||||
3,751,431 | 2,299,122 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| 62,390 | ||||||
Other accruals |
132,968 | 175,384 | ||||||
Securities |
| 15,240 | ||||||
132,968 | 253,014 | |||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 3,618,463 | $ | 2,046,108 | ||||
Note 5. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
In the normal course of business, Pinnacle Financial has entered into off-balance sheet financial instruments which include commitments to extend credit (i.e., including unfunded lines of credit) and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are usually the result of lines of credit granted to existing borrowers under agreements that the total outstanding indebtedness will not exceed a specific amount during the term of the indebtedness. Typical borrowers are commercial concerns that use lines of credit to supplement their treasury management functions, thus their total outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate during any time period based on the seasonality of their business and the resultant timing of their cash flows. Other typical lines of credit are related to home equity loans granted to consumers. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.
Standby letters of credit are generally issued on behalf of an applicant (our customer) to a specifically named beneficiary and are the result of a particular business arrangement that exists between the applicant and the beneficiary. Standby letters of credit have fixed expiration dates and are usually for terms of two years or less unless terminated beforehand due to criteria specified in the standby letter of credit. A typical arrangement involves the applicant routinely being indebted to the beneficiary for such items as inventory purchases, insurance, utilities, lease guarantees or other third party commercial transactions. The standby letter of credit would permit the beneficiary to obtain payment from Pinnacle Financial under certain prescribed circumstances. Subsequently, Pinnacle Financial would then seek reimbursement from the applicant pursuant to the terms of the standby letter of credit.
Pinnacle Financial follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices when making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each customers creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis and the amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on managements credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, real estate and improvements, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and personal property.
The contractual amounts of these commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and would only be reflected if drawn upon. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default on their resulting obligation to us, Pinnacle Financials maximum exposure to credit loss, without consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.
A summary of Pinnacle Financials total contractual amount for all off-balance sheet commitments at March 31, 2005 is as follows:
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 209,544,000 | ||
Standby letters of credit |
51,430,000 |
Page 14
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
At March 31, 2005, the fair value of Pinnacle Financials standby letters of credit was $240,000. This amount represents the unamortized fee associated with these standby letters of credit and is included in the consolidated balance sheet of Pinnacle Financial. This fair value will decrease over time as the existing standby letters of credit approach their expiration dates.
Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, claims outstanding at December 31, 2004 have no material effect on Pinnacle Financials consolidated financial statements.
Note 6. Stock Option Plans and Restricted Shares
Pinnacle Financial has two stock option plans under which it has granted options to its employees to purchase common stock at or above the fair market value on the date of grant. All of the options are intended to be incentive stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code for favorable tax treatment. To date, options under the plans vest in 20% increments each year over a five year period beginning one year after the date of the grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant.
A summary of the plan changes during the three months ended March 31, 2005 is as follows:
Weighted- | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Exercise | ||||||||
Number | Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
1,068,350 | $ | 7.03 | |||||
Granted |
145,182 | 23.85 | ||||||
Exercised |
(2,139 | ) | 5.23 | |||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2005 |
1,211,393 | $ | 9.04 | |||||
The following table summarizes information about Pinnacle Financials stock option plan at March 31, 2005:
Number of | Remaining | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||
Remaining | Weighted-Average | Average | Number of | |||||||||||||
Grant date | Shares | Contractual | Exercise | Shares | ||||||||||||
by year | Outstanding | Life in Years | Price | Exercisable | ||||||||||||
2000 |
358,840 | 5.7 | $ | 5.00 | 287,072 | |||||||||||
2001 |
94,220 | 5.9 | 3.82 | 74,956 | ||||||||||||
2002 |
244,345 | 6.9 | 5.01 | 144,687 | ||||||||||||
2003 |
181,100 | 8.1 | 7.55 | 53,300 | ||||||||||||
2004 |
187,706 | 9.0 | 14.65 | 20,723 | ||||||||||||
2005 |
145,182 | 9.8 | 23.85 | | ||||||||||||
1,211,393 | 7.3 | $ | 9.04 | 580,738 | ||||||||||||
Additionally, Pinnacle Financials 2004 equity incentive plan provides for the granting of restricted share awards and other performance-based awards, such as stock appreciation rights. During 2004, Pinnacle Financial awarded 3,846 shares of restricted common stock to certain executives of Pinnacle Financial. The forfeiture restrictions on the restricted shares lapse in three separate tranches should Pinnacle Financial achieve certain earnings and soundness targets for the 2004, 2005 and 2006 fiscal years or earnings and soundness targets for the three year period ended December 31, 2006. Compensation expense associated with the restricted share awards is recognized over the time period that the restrictions associated with the awards lapse. As a result, at each financial reporting date, the restricted shares are marked to fair value and compensation expense is measured based on the anticipated number of shares that will ultimately vest and the timing of the vesting period. Earnings and soundness targets for the 2004 fiscal year were achieved and the restrictions related to 1,282 shares were released. For the three month period ended March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately $8,000 in compensation costs attributable to these awards.
Page 15
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 7. Regulatory Matters
Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial under federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Pinnacle Financial is also subject to limits on payment of dividends to its shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of federal banking authorities. Pinnacle Financial has not paid any dividends to date, nor does it anticipate paying dividends to its shareholders for the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy will depend on Pinnacle Nationals earnings, capital position, financial condition and other factors.
Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Pinnacle Financials and Pinnacle Nationals capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes, as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle National must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle Nationals actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):
Minimum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
To Be Well-Capitalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum | Under Prompt | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital | Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Requirement | Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 76,165 | 11.5 | % | $ | 53,031 | 8.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 68,225 | 10.3 | % | $ | 52,919 | 8.0 | % | $ | 66,148 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 69,967 | 10.6 | % | $ | 26,516 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 62,027 | 9.4 | % | $ | 26,459 | 4.0 | % | $ | 39,689 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 69,967 | 9.2 | % | $ | 30,275 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 62,027 | 8.2 | % | $ | 30,165 | 4.0 | % | $ | 37,706 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 73,540 | 12.7 | % | $ | 46,410 | 8.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 63,775 | 11.0 | % | $ | 46,373 | 8.0 | % | $ | 57,967 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 67,880 | 11.7 | % | $ | 23,205 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 58,115 | 10.0 | % | $ | 23,187 | 4.0 | % | $ | 34,780 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 67,880 | 9.7 | % | $ | 28,134 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 58,115 | 8.3 | % | $ | 28,116 | 4.0 | % | $ | 35,145 | 5.0 | % |
(*) | Average assets for the above calculations were averages for the most recent quarter. |
Page 16
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 8. Investments in Affiliated Companies
Investments in affiliated companies accounted for under the equity method consist of 100% of the common stock of PNFP Statutory Trust I (Trust), a wholly-owned statutory business trust. The Trust was formed on December 30, 2003. Summary financial information for the Trust follows (dollars in thousands):
Summary Balance Sheet
At March 31, | At Dec. 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Asset Investment in subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 10,310 | $ | 10,310 | ||||
Liabilities |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Stockholders equity Trust preferred securities |
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Common stock (100% owned by Pinnacle Financial) |
310 | 310 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
10,310 | 10,310 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 10,310 | $ | 10,310 | ||||
Summary Income Statement
Three months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Income Interest income from subordinated debentures
issued by Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 135 | 102 | |||||
Net Income |
$ | 135 | 102 | |||||
Summary Statement of Stockholders Equity
Trust | Total | |||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Retained | Stockholders | |||||||||||||
Securities | Stock | Earnings | Equity | |||||||||||||
Beginning balances, December 31, 2004 |
$ | 10,000 | $ | 310 | $ | | $ | 10,310 | ||||||||
Retained earnings: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | 135 | 135 | ||||||||||||
Dividends: |
||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred securities |
| | (131 | ) | (131 | ) | ||||||||||
Common paid to Pinnacle Financial |
| | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Total retained earnings |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Ending balances, March 31, 2005 |
$ | 10,000 | $ | 310 | $ | | $ | 10,310 | ||||||||
Note 9. Subsequent Events
On April 19, 2005, the shareholders of Pinnacle Financial approved an increase in the number of authorized shares of capital stock from 30,000,000 shares to 50,000,000 shares. With the increase, the number of authorized shares of common stock was increased from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares and the number of authorized shares of preferred stock remained at 10,000,000 shares.
On April 19, 2005, the shareholders also approved an amendment to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan which would set aside for issuance an additional 250,000 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock.
Page 17
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of our financial condition at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements. You should read the following discussion and analysis along with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein.
Overview
General. Pinnacle Financials rapid growth from its inception through the first quarter of 2005 continues to have a material impact on Pinnacle Financials financial condition and results of operations. This rapid growth resulted in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 of $0.19 per diluted share as compared to $0.13 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2004. At March 31, 2005, loans totaled $517 million, as compared to $472 million at December 31, 2004, while total deposits were $619 million at March 31, 2005 compared to $571 million at December 31, 2004.
Results of Operations. Pinnacle Financials net interest income increased to $6.5 million in the first quarter of 2005 from $4.2 million in 2004. The net interest margin (the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets for the period) was 3.78% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to 3.49% for the same period in 2004.
The increase in loan volumes for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was the primary cause for the $247,000 increase in Pinnacle Financials provision for loan losses when compared to the same period in 2004. As Pinnacle Financials loan portfolio continues to grow, Pinnacle Financial expects that the growth will be considered in establishing the allowance for loan losses.
Noninterest income for the first three months of 2005 compared to the same time period in 2004 increased by $47,000, or 4.2%. The increase between 2005 and 2004 was due to Pinnacle Financials increased revenues from its mortgage origination unit, increases in investment services revenues between the periods, and increases in deposit service charges partially offset by decreases in gains on the sales of loans and securities available-for-sale.
Pinnacle Financials growth for the first three months of 2005 when compared to the same time period in 2004 resulted in an increase of approximately $1.3 million in noninterest expense related to salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses and other operating expenses. As Pinnacle Financial increased its number of full-time equivalent employees from 95.0 at March 31, 2004 to 131.5 at March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial experienced an approximately $797,000 increase in compensation and employee benefit expense. Pinnacle Financial expects to add additional employees throughout 2005 which will cause Pinnacle Financials compensation and employee benefit expense to increase in future periods. Pinnacle Financials branch expansion efforts in 2004 and 2005 also resulted in increased noninterest expense for the first three months of 2005. The increased operational expenses for the branches opened in 2004 and the expected opening of two additional branches in 2005 will continue to result in increased noninterest expense in future periods. Although Pinnacle Financials expenses increased in 2005 when compared to 2004, Pinnacle Financials efficiency ratio, the ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, decreased from 62.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to 59.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
We continue to believe that a rising short-term interest rate environment is more likely than a falling rate environment over the next few quarters. We believe this should result in increased net interest income for us, in contrast to a falling or stagnant rate environment, primarily due to approximately 55.5% of our loan volumes are floating rate loans that reprice with adjustments to our prime lending rate or other similarly published overnite interest rate indices. We believe we will continue to grow our balance sheet with continued emphasis on floating rate lending. However, due to increased competition for deposits in Nashville, we do not believe we will experience any additional margin expansion for the remainder of 2005 with some likelihood that modest contraction could occur to meet the competitive pressures to maintain and acquire additional deposit volumes.
Page 18
Conversely, a falling rate environment could serve to have the opposite effect on our net interest income. In a falling rate environment, we may not be able to reduce our deposit funding costs by any meaningful amount due to market pressures, while our interest income could decrease at a more rapid pace.
Financial Condition. The $44 million increase in loans during the first three months of 2005 contributed to the increase in Pinnacle Financials net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 when compared to an increase of $26 million for the similar period in 2004. As Pinnacle Financial seeks to increase its loan portfolio it must also continue to monitor the risks inherent in its lending operations. If Pinnacle Financials allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover loan losses in Pinnacle Financials loan portfolio, increases to the allowance for loan losses would be required which would decrease Pinnacle Financials earnings.
Pinnacle Financial has successfully grown its total deposits to $619 million at March 31, 2005 compared to $571 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of 8.4%.
We continue to believe there is broad acceptance of our business model within the Nashville area and in our target markets of small businesses and affluent clients. As a result, and due to our sales pipelines remaining strong at the current time, we believe we will continue to increase our loan and deposit balances for the remainder of 2005 at volumes comparable to prior periods.
Capital and Liquidity. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financials capital ratios, including Pinnacle Nationals capital ratios, met regulatory minimum capital requirements and all requirements Pinnacle Financial has committed to regulators to maintain. Additionally, at March 31, 2005, Pinnacle National would be considered to be well-capitalized pursuant to banking regulations.
Over the past few years, we have been successful in procuring additional capital from the capital markets (via public and private offerings). The additional capital was required to support our growth. We currently believe, with anticipated earnings in future periods and future balance sheet projections, we will be able to maintain acceptable capital levels without having to obtain additional common equity. However, our current planning assumption is that should we determine that Pinnacle Financial require supplemental capital to support continued rapid growth, we would, in all likelihood, seek approval from regulatory authorities to issue additional trust preferred securities. However, circumstances unknown to us at this time, including expansion to other geographic markets, could require us to seek additional capital through the issuance of Pinnacle Financial common stock.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with United States generally accepted accounting principles and with general practices within the banking industry. In connection with the application of those principles, we have made judgments and estimates which, in the case of the determination of our allowance for loan losses (ALL), have been critical to the determination of our financial position and results of operations.
Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL). Our management assesses the adequacy of the ALL prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The ALL consists of two portions (1) an allocated amount representative of specifically identified credit exposure and exposures readily predictable by historical or comparative experience; and (2) an unallocated amount representative of inherent loss which is not readily identifiable. Even though the ALL is composed of two components, the entire ALL is available to absorb any credit losses.
We establish the allocated amount separately for two different risk groups (1) unique loans (commercial loans, including those loans considered impaired); and (2) homogeneous loans (generally consumer loans). We base the allocation for unique loans primarily on risk rating grades assigned to each of these loans as a result of our loan management and review processes. We then assign each risk-rating grade a loss ratio, which is determined based on the experience of management, discussions with banking regulators and our independent loan review process. We estimate losses on impaired loans based on estimated cash flows discounted at the loans original effective interest rate or based on the underlying collateral value. Based on managements experience, we also assign loss ratios to
Page 19
our consumer portfolio. These loss ratios are assigned to the various homogenous categories of the consumer portfolio (e.g., automobile, residential mortgage, home equity).
The unallocated amount is particularly subjective and does not lend itself to exact mathematical calculation. The unallocated amount represents estimated inherent credit losses which may exist, but have not yet been identified, as of the balance sheet date. In estimating the unallocated amount, we consider such matters as changes in the local or national economy, the depth or experience in the lending staff, any concentrations of credit in any particular industry group, and new banking laws or regulations. After we assess applicable factors, we evaluate the aggregate unallocated amount based on our managements experience.
We then test the resulting ALL balance by comparing the balance in the ALL to historical trends and peer information. Our management then evaluates the result of the procedures performed, including the result of our testing, and concludes on the appropriateness of the balance of the ALL in its entirety. The audit committee of our board of directors reviews the assessment prior to the filing of quarterly and annual financial information.
In assessing the adequacy of the ALL, we also rely on an ongoing independent loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there are loans in the portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall evaluation of the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process includes the judgment of management, the input from our independent loan reviewer, who is not an employee of Pinnacle National, and reviews that may have been conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process.
Results of Operations
Our results were highlighted by the continued growth in loans and other earning assets and deposits, which resulted in increased revenues and expenses. Our net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $1,780,000 and $1,071,000, respectively, as follows:
Three Months | ||||||||||||
Ended March 31, | Percent | |||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | Increase | ||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 9,270 | $ | 5,666 | 63.6 | % | ||||||
Interest expense |
2,767 | 1,514 | 82.7 | |||||||||
Net interest income |
6,503 | 4,152 | 56.6 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
601 | 354 | 69.8 | |||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
5,902 | 3,798 | 55.4 | |||||||||
Noninterest income |
1,178 | 1,131 | 4.2 | |||||||||
Noninterest expense |
4,581 | 3,318 | 38.1 | |||||||||
Net income before taxes |
2,499 | 1,611 | 55.1 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
719 | 540 | 33.1 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,780 | $ | 1,071 | 66.2 | % | ||||||
Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the amount by which interest earned on various earning assets exceeds interest paid on deposits and other interest bearing liabilities and is the most significant component of our earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we recorded net interest income of $6,503,000, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.78% for the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, we recorded net interest income of $4,152,000, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.49% for the period.
The following tables set forth the amount of our average balances, interest income or interest expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net yield on average interest-earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):
Page 20
Three months ended | Three months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2005 | March 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances | Interest | Rate(1) | Balances | Interest | Rate(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 488,313 | $ | 6,954 | 5.78 | % | $ | 306,549 | $ | 3,947 | 5.14 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
184,926 | 2,022 | 4.43 | 140,007 | 1,551 | 4.44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
23,327 | 201 | 4.50 | 9,795 | 86 | 4.52 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
8,848 | 46 | 2.10 | 22,024 | 49 | 0.91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
3,276 | 47 | 6.50 | 2,401 | 33 | 6.15 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
708,690 | 9,270 | 5.34 | 480,776 | 5,666 | 4.73 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-earning assets |
48,194 | 27,664 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 756,884 | $ | 508,440 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking |
$ | 57,738 | 72 | 0.51 | % | $ | 32,859 | 42 | 0.51 | % | ||||||||||||||
Savings and money market |
222,079 | 698 | 1.27 | 146,731 | 286 | 0.78 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
216,612 | 1,383 | 2.59 | 161,559 | 843 | 2.09 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
496,429 | 2,153 | 1.76 | 341,149 | 1,171 | 1.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
38,149 | 150 | 1.60 | 14,868 | 9 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
614 | 5 | 2.76 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
50,233 | 323 | 2.61 | 42,379 | 231 | 2.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310 | 136 | 5.32 | 10,310 | 103 | 3.98 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
595,735 | 2,767 | 1.88 | 408,706 | 1,514 | 1.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
100,929 | | | 61,454 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits and interest-bearing
liabilities |
696,664 | 2,767 | 1.61 | 470,160 | 1,514 | 1.29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
1,800 | 2,575 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
58,420 | 35,705 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 756,884 | $ | 508,440 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 6,503 | $ | 4,152 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread (2) |
3.46 | % | 3.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (3) |
3.78 | % | 3.49 | % |
(1) | Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis. | |
(2) | Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. | |
(3) | Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets for the period. |
As noted above, the net interest margin for the first quarter of 2005 was 3.78% compared to a net interest margin of 3.49% for the same period in 2004, an increase of 0.29%. Other matters related to the changes in net interest income, net interest yields and rates, and net interest margin are presented below:
| Our loan yields increased from 5.14% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to 5.78% for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Approximately 55.5% of our loans are floating rate loans at March 31, 2005 compared to 56.0% at December 31, 2004 and 52.4% at March 31, 2004. The interest rates charged these borrowers are tied, in substantially all cases, to our prime rate which is usually less than fixed rate loan yields. Our weighted average prime rate for the first three months of 2005 was 5.43% compared to 4.25% for the same period in 2004. The rates for 2005 were higher due primarily to periodic increases in the overnight Federal funds rate as determined by the Open Market Committee of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. Pinnacle National uses the overnight Federal funds rate as the primary benchmark in setting its prime lending rate. | |||
| We have been able to grow our funding base significantly. For asset/liability management purposes in 2005, we elected to allocate a greater proportion of such funds to our loan portfolio versus our securities and shorter term investment portfolio than in 2004. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, average |
Page 21
loan balances were 68.9% of total interest earning assets compared to 63.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Loans generally have higher yields than do securities and other shorter term investments. This change in allocation contributed to the overall total interest earning asset yields of 5.34% for the first three months of 2005 being 0.61% higher than the 4.73% for the first three months of 2004. |
| During 2005, overall deposit rates were higher than those rates for the comparable period in 2004. Changes in interest rates paid on such products as interest checking, savings and money market accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal funds purchased will generally increase or decrease in a manner that is consistent with changes in the short-term rate environment. During 2005, and as was the case with our prime lending rate, short-term rates were higher than in 2004. We also monitor the pricing of similar products by our primary competitors. The changes in the short-term rate environment and the pricing of our primary competitors required us to increase these rates in 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. | |||
| During the first three months of 2005, the average balances of noninterest bearing deposit balances, interest bearing transaction accounts, savings and money market accounts and securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to 60.1% of our total funding compared to 54.4% in 2004. These funding sources generally have lower rates than do other funding sources, such as certificates of deposit and other borrowings. As a result, the average rates on fundings for the first three months of 2005 were lower than they would have been otherwise due to this change in funding mix. | |||
| Similarly, the short- and long-term rate environment impacts rates paid on certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB; however, these items are also impacted by our decisions to alter the mix of maturities of the underlying accounts within these items. Furthermore, the timing of the initial sale of the certificate of deposit or the funding of the FHLB advance also impacts the rates paid on these items. Our results were impacted by certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB that had been acquired during periods of lower interest rates. Such items matured during the interim period between the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and were replaced by certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB which had higher interest rates. These matters contributed to the increase in the rates paid on certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB between the two periods. | |||
| Also impacting the net interest margin during the first three months of 2005 compared to 2004 was pricing of our subordinated indebtedness. The interest rate charged on this indebtedness is generally higher than other funding sources. The rate charged on this indebtedness is determined in relation to the three-month LIBOR index and reprices quarterly. During 2005, the short-term interest rate environment was higher than during the three months ended March 31, 2004, and, as a result, the pricing for this funding source was higher in 2005 than in 2004. |
Rate and Volume Analysis. As noted above, net interest income increased by $2,351,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. The following is an analysis of the changes in our net interest income comparing the changes attributable to rates and those attributable to volumes (dollars in thousands):
Page 22
Increase (decrease) due to | Total increase | |||||||||||
Dollar change in interest income and expense | Volume | Rate | (decrease) | |||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 2,489 | $ | 518 | $ | 3,007 | ||||||
Securities: |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
523 | (52 | ) | 471 | ||||||||
Tax-exempt |
124 | (9 | ) | 115 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under agreements to resell |
(165 | ) | 162 | (3 | ) | |||||||
Other |
12 | 2 | 14 | |||||||||
2,983 | 621 | 3,604 | ||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Interest checking |
$ | 34 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 30 | |||||
Savings and money market accounts |
186 | 226 | 412 | |||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
320 | 220 | 540 | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
540 | 442 | 982 | |||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
32 | 109 | 141 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
4 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
46 | 46 | 92 | |||||||||
Subordinated debt |
25 | 8 | 33 | |||||||||
647 | 606 | 1,253 | ||||||||||
Increase in net interest income |
$ | 2,336 | $ | 15 | $ | 2,351 | ||||||
(1) | The above amounts are presented on a fully tax equivalent basis. | |
(2) | Changes in net interest income are attributed to either changes in average balances (volume change) or changes in average rates (rate change) for earning assets and sources of funds on which interest is received or paid. Volume change is calculated as change in volume times the previous rate while rate change is calculated as a change in rate times the previous volume. The change attributed to rates and volumes (change in rate times change in volume) is allocated between volume change and rate change at the ratio of how much each component bears to the absolute value of their total. |
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents a charge to earnings necessary to establish an allowance for loan losses that, in our managements evaluation, should be adequate to provide coverage for the inherent losses on outstanding loans. The provision for loan losses amounted to $601,000 and $354,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Based upon our managements evaluation of the loan portfolio, we believe the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to absorb our estimate of probable losses existing in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The increase in the provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 when compared to the same period in 2004 was primarily due to the increase in loan volumes for the three months ended March 31, 2005 when compared to 2004 and a $23,000 increase in net charge-offs in 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Based upon managements assessment of the loan portfolio, we adjust our allowance for loan losses to an amount deemed appropriate to adequately cover inherent risks in the loan portfolio. While our policies and procedures used to estimate the allowance for loan losses, as well as the resultant provision for loan losses charged to operations, are considered adequate by our management and are reviewed from time to time by Pinnacle Nationals regulators, they are necessarily approximate and imprecise. There exist factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions both locally and nationally, which may negatively impact, materially, the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and, thus, the resulting provision for loan losses.
Noninterest Income. Our noninterest income is composed of several components, some of which vary significantly between quarterly periods. Service charges on deposit accounts and other noninterest income generally reflect our growth, while investment services and fees from the origination of mortgage loans will often reflect market conditions and fluctuate from period to period. The opportunities for recognition of gains on loans and loan participations sold and gain on sales of investment securities may also vary widely from quarter to quarter and year to year.
Page 23
The following is the makeup of our noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):
% increase | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | (decrease) | ||||||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 262 | $ | 164 | 59.8 | % | ||||||
Investment services |
437 | 390 | 12.1 | |||||||||
Gains on sales of loans and loan participations, net: |
||||||||||||
Fees from the origination and sale of mortgage
loans, net of sales commissions |
176 | 100 | 76.0 | |||||||||
Other |
(15 | ) | 120 | (120.5 | ) | |||||||
Gains on sales of investment securities, net |
114 | 248 | (54.0 | ) | ||||||||
Other noninterest income |
204 | 109 | 87.2 | |||||||||
Total noninterest income |
$ | 1,178 | $ | 1,131 | 4.2 | % | ||||||
As shown, the largest component of noninterest income is commissions and fees from our financial advisory unit, Pinnacle Asset Management, a division of Pinnacle National. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Asset Management was receiving commissions and fees in connection with approximately $400 million in brokerage assets held with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. compared to $351 million at March 31, 2004.
Service charge income for the first three months of 2005 increased over that of the first three months of 2004 due to an increase in the number of deposit accounts subject to service charges. Additionally, mortgage related fees also provided for a significant portion of the increase in noninterest income between 2005 and 2004 due to increased volumes of originations and increased number of mortgage originators. These mortgage fees are for loans originated by Pinnacle National and subsequently sold to third-party investors. All loans are sold whereby servicing rights transfer to the buyer. Generally, mortgage origination fees increase in lower interest rate environments and decrease in rising interest rate environments. As a result, mortgage origination fees may fluctuate greatly in response to a changing rate environment. Direct sales commissions paid to mortgage originators have been reclassified and offset against the fees from the origination of mortgage loans.
Another noninterest income item for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was related to our sale of certain loan participations to our correspondent banks that were primarily related to new lending transactions in excess of internal loan limits. At March 31, 2005 and pursuant to participation agreements with these correspondents, we had participated approximately $59 million of originated loans to these other banks compared to $55 million at March 31, 2004. These participation agreements have various provisions regarding collateral position, pricing and other matters. Many of these agreements provide that we pay the correspondent less than the loans contracted interest rate. Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125, we recorded a loss of $15,000 during the first quarter of 2005. This loss represents the unamortized asset associated with certain loans previously sold to correspondents which were prepaid by the borrower. As the loans were prepaid by the borrower, the unamortized asset associated with these loans has been reflected as a loss on sales of loans and loan participations sold in the accompanying statement of income. These loss amounts exceeded the net present value of future net revenues associated with new loans sold to correspondents. As a result a net loss has been reflected in the above amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The $15,000 loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compares to $122,000 in net gains during the three months ended March 31, 2004. At March 31, 2005, the remaining unamortized asset associated with the cumulative gains approximated $433,000. We intend to maintain relationships with our correspondents in order to sell participations in future loans to these correspondents in a similar manner. However, the timing of participations may cause the level of gains, if any, to vary significantly.
Also included in noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2005, were net gains of approximately $114,000 realized from the sale of approximately $6.8 million of available-for-sale securities. This compares to $248,000 in gains on the sale of approximately $21.9 million of investment securities for the same period in the prior year.
Page 24
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses, and other operating expenses. The following is the makeup of our noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):
% Increase | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | (decrease) | ||||||||||
Noninterest expense: |
||||||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits: |
||||||||||||
Salaries |
$ | 1,847 | $ | 1,393 | 32.6 | % | ||||||
Commissions |
170 | 135 | 25.9 | |||||||||
Other, primarily incentives |
556 | 354 | 57.1 | |||||||||
Employee benefits |
398 | 291 | 36.8 | |||||||||
Total compensation and employee benefits |
2,971 | 2,173 | 36.7 | |||||||||
Equipment and occupancy |
784 | 506 | 54.9 | |||||||||
Marketing and other business development |
113 | 149 | (24.6 | ) | ||||||||
Postage and supplies |
136 | 99 | 40.4 | |||||||||
Other noninterest expense: |
||||||||||||
Accounting and auditing |
90 | 44 | 104.5 | |||||||||
Consultants, including loan review |
31 | 36 | (13.9 | ) | ||||||||
Legal, including borrower related charges |
26 | 37 | (29.7 | ) | ||||||||
OCC exam fees |
42 | 30 | 40.0 | |||||||||
Directors fees |
65 | 31 | 109.7 | |||||||||
Insurance, including FDIC |
80 | 45 | 77.8 | |||||||||
Other |
243 | 168 | 44.6 | |||||||||
Total other noninterest expense |
577 | 391 | 47.6 | |||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
$ | 4,581 | $ | 3,318 | 38.1 | % | ||||||
Expenses have generally increased between the above periods due to personnel additions occurring throughout each period, the continued development of our branch network and other expenses which increase in relation to our growth rate. We anticipate continued increases in our expenses during 2005 when compared to 2004 for such items as additional personnel, the opening of additional branches, legal and audit expenses and other expenses which tend to increase in relation to our growth.
At March 31, 2005, we employed 131.5 full time equivalent employees compared to 95.0 at March 31, 2004. We intend to continue to add employees to our work force during 2005, which will cause our salary costs to increase in future periods.
We believe that variable pay incentives are a valuable tool in motivating an employee base that is focused on providing our clients effective financial advice and increasing shareholder value. As a result, and unlike many other financial institutions, substantially all of our employees are eligible to participate in an annual cash incentive plan. Included in the salary and employee benefits amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, are $507,000 and $290,000 in costs related to these variable pay awards. The awards will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on the estimation of achievement of performance targets and the increase in the number of associates eligible to receive the award. For 2004, the actual award paid equaled approximately 80% of the targeted award. The incentive plan for 2005 is structured similarly to prior year plans. Because of the relative experience of our associates, our compensation costs are and we expect will continue to be higher on a per associate basis than other financial institutions; however, we believe the experience and engagement of our associates also allows us to employ fewer people than most financial institutions our size.
Also, during 2004 we opened a new branch office in the West End area of Nashville and in January of 2005 opened an office in Franklin, Tennessee. Our occupancy and equipment expenses in 2005 increased over that of 2004 due to the branches only being open for part of in 2004.
Marketing and other business development expenses are lower in 2005 compared to 2004 due to decreased customer entertainment and community relations expenses. Other noninterest expenses are significantly higher
Page 25
in 2005 over the same periods in 2004. For the three month period ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, other noninterest expenses were $185,000 higher. Most of these increases are attributable to increased audit and accounting fees, and insurance expenses. Of particular note is that audit and accounting fees are higher in 2005 due to increased expenses associated with Sarbanes Oxley Section 404 compliance and other matters.
Our efficiency ratio (ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income) was 59.6% in the first quarter of 2005 compared to 62.8% in the first quarter of 2004. The efficiency ratio measures the amount of expense that is incurred to generate a dollar of revenue. Our efficiency ratio will fluctuate due to many factors. Concerning expenses, each periods efficiency ratio will be impacted by the number of new associates added and any new offices.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax expense rate for the first three months of 2005 was approximately 28.8% compared to an effective income tax expense rate for 2004 of approximately 33.5%. The reduction in the effective tax rate between 2005 and 2004 was 4.7% and was primarily due to Federal tax credits related to the New Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately $2.3 million in future Federal tax credits to be realized over the next six years. The credit that is available for the year ended December 31, 2005 is $300,000 of which $75,000 has been recognized in the first quarter of 2005 and none was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2004. Pinnacle Financial believes that it and its subsidiary will be able to comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New Markets Tax Credit program during 2005 and future periods such that it will be able to continue to claim the credit in its 2005 Federal income tax return. Also, during the fourth quarter of 2004, we formed a real estate investment trust which provides us with an alternative vehicle for raising capital should we so desire. Additionally, the ownership structure of this real estate investment trust provides certain income tax benefits to us.
Page 26
Quarterly Information. The following is a summary of quarterly balance sheet and results of
operations information for the last six quarters (dollars in thousands, except per share data).
March | December | September | June | March | December | |||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2004 | 2004 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data, at quarter end: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 787,436 | 727,139 | 685,408 | 586,313 | 541,052 | 498,421 | |||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
516,733 | 472,362 | 434,909 | 355,267 | 323,416 | 297,004 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(6,198 | ) | (5,650 | ) | (5,434 | ) | (4,466 | ) | (4,042 | ) | (3,719 | ) | ||||||||||||
Securities |
202,223 | 208,170 | 191,323 | 165,528 | 162,315 | 139,944 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
619,021 | 570,727 | 541,859 | 467,321 | 437,601 | 390,569 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
46,388 | 31,928 | 22,958 | 23,772 | 14,699 | 15,050 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
51,500 | 53,500 | 51,500 | 47,500 | 40,500 | 44,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
57,657 | 57,880 | 56,668 | 35,125 | 36,266 | 34,336 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data, quarterly averages: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 756,884 | 707,131 | 618,694 | 555,437 | 508,440 | 454,700 | |||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
488,313 | 448,611 | 392,220 | 343,974 | 306,549 | 283,387 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
208,253 | 203,728 | 183,721 | 169,192 | 149,802 | 137,243 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
708,690 | 670,839 | 589,554 | 527,070 | 480,776 | 432,691 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
597,358 | 562,936 | 485,300 | 439,964 | 402,603 | 356,030 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
38,149 | 23,520 | 25,953 | 17,523 | 14,868 | 16,013 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
50,233 | 48,022 | 49,000 | 45,736 | 42,379 | 43,630 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | 655 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
58,420 | 57,721 | 43,868 | 35,542 | 35,705 | 33,935 | ||||||||||||||||||
Statement of operations data, for the
three months ended: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 9,270 | 8,574 | 7,214 | 6,225 | 5,666 | 5,244 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
2,767 | 2,296 | 1,915 | 1,689 | 1,514 | 1,351 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
6,503 | 6,278 | 5,299 | 4,536 | 4,152 | 3,893 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
601 | 1,134 | 1,012 | 449 | 354 | 204 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
5,902 | 5,144 | 4,287 | 4,087 | 3,798 | 3,689 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
1,178 | 1,246 | 1,534 | 1,067 | 1,131 | 852 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
4,581 | 4,127 | 3,860 | 3,499 | 3,318 | 3,196 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before taxes |
2,499 | 2,263 | 1,961 | 1,655 | 1,611 | 1,345 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
719 | 574 | 570 | 487 | 540 | 487 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,780 | 1,689 | 1,391 | 1,168 | 1,071 | 858 | |||||||||||||||||
Per share data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings basic |
$ | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.12 | |||||||||||||||||
Earnings diluted |
$ | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.11 | |||||||||||||||||
Book value at quarter end(1) |
$ | 6.87 | 6.90 | 6.75 | 4.74 | 4.91 | 4.65 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted avg. shares basic |
8,389,256 | 8,389,232 | 7,832,512 | 7,397,920 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted avg. shares diluted |
9,437,183 | 9,448,696 | 8,857,015 | 8,279,114 | 8,213,730 | 8,114,888 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
8,391,371 | 8,389,232 | 8,389,232 | 7,404,586 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 |
(1) | Book value per share computed by dividing total stockholders equity by common shares outstanding |
Page 27
Financial Condition
Our consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2005 reflects significant growth since December 31, 2004. Total assets grew to $787 million as of March 31, 2005 up 33% on an annualized basis from the $727 million reported at December 31, 2004. Loans as of March 31, 2005 were $517 million compared to $472 million at December 31, 2004. Total deposits increased to $619 million at March 31, 2005, compared to $571 million at December 31, 2004.
Net loan growth for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was $44.4 million compared to $26.4 million during the first quarter of 2004. Total deposit growth for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, was $48.3 million compared to $47.0 million during the first quarter of 2004.
Loans. The composition of loans at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and the percentage (%) of each classification to total loans are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
$ | 122,639 | 23.7 | % | $ | 117,123 | 24.8 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate Construction |
24,456 | 4.8 | 8,428 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Other |
200,054 | 38.7 | 189,456 | 40.1 | ||||||||||||
Total commercial |
347,149 | 67.2 | 315,007 | 66.7 | ||||||||||||
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
145,676 | 28.2 | 126,907 | 26.9 | ||||||||||||
Consumer real estate Construction |
8,380 | 1.6 | 14,991 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Other |
15,528 | 3.0 | 15,457 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
Total consumer |
169,584 | 32.8 | 157,355 | 33.3 | ||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 516,733 | 100.0 | % | $ | 472,362 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The following table classifies our fixed and variable rate loans at March 31, 2005 according to contractual maturities of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, and (3) after five years along with percentage comparisons to December 31, 2004. The table also classifies our variable rate loans pursuant to the contractual repricing dates of the underlying loans (dollars in thousands):
Amounts at March 31, 2005 | Percentages to total loans | |||||||||||||||||||
Fixed | Variable | at Mar. 31, | at Dec. 31, | |||||||||||||||||
Rates | Rates | Total | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Based on contractual maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 9,432 | $ | 160,004 | $ | 169,436 | 32.8 | % | 31.4 | % | ||||||||||
Due in one year through five years |
106,381 | 93,665 | 200,046 | 38.7 | 40.8 | |||||||||||||||
Due after five years |
32,358 | 114,893 | 147,251 | 28.5 | 27.8 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 148,171 | $ | 368,562 | $ | 516,733 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Based on contractual repricing dates: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Floating rate |
$ | | $ | 286,580 | $ | 286,580 | 55.5 | % | 56.0 | % | ||||||||||
Reprice within one year |
9,432 | 37,229 | 46,661 | 9.0 | 9.1 | |||||||||||||||
Reprice in one year through five years |
106,381 | 40,481 | 146,862 | 28.4 | 28.8 | |||||||||||||||
Reprice after five years |
32,358 | 4,272 | 36,630 | 7.1 | 6.1 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 148,171 | $ | 368,562 | $ | 516,733 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
The above information does not consider the impact of scheduled principal payments. Daily floating rate loans are tied to Pinnacle Nationals prime lending rate or a national interest rate index with the underlying loan rates changing in relation to changes in these indexes.
Non-Performing Assets. The specific economic and credit risks associated with our loan portfolio, include, but are not limited to, a general downturn in the economy which could affect employment rates in our market area, general real estate market deterioration, interest rate fluctuations, deteriorated or non-existent collateral, title defects, inaccurate appraisals, financial deterioration of borrowers, fraud, and any violation of banking laws and regulations.
We attempt to reduce these economic and credit risks by adherence to loan to value guidelines for collateralized loans, by investigating the creditworthiness of the borrower and by monitoring the borrowers financial position. Also, we establish and periodically review our lending policies and procedures. Banking regulations limit our
Page 28
exposure by prohibiting loan relationships that exceed 15% of Pinnacle Nationals statutory capital in the case of loans that are not fully secured by readily marketable or other permissible types of collateral.
We discontinue the accrual of interest income when (1) there is a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or (2) the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. At March 31, 2005, we had two loans for $561,000 on nonaccruing status which were the same two loans at December 31, 2004. An estimate of the loss related to these nonaccrual loans has been incorporated into our ALL methodology.
There were approximately $47,000 in other loans at March 31, 2005 which were 90 days past due and still accruing interest. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, no loans were deemed to be a restructured loan. Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2005, we foreclosed on a single piece of property collateralizing one consumer loan. The foreclosed property was placed in Pinnacle Nationals Other Real Estate Owned. We had no repossessed real estate properties classified as Other Real Estate Owned at December 31, 2004. The following table is a summary of our nonperforming assets at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Nonaccrual loans(1) |
$ | 561 | $ | 561 | ||||
Restructured loans |
| | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
35 | | ||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
596 | 561 | ||||||
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
47 | 146 | ||||||
Total nonperforming assets and accruing loans
past due 90 days or more |
$ | 643 | $ | 707 | ||||
Total loans outstanding |
$ | 516,733 | $ | 472,362 | ||||
Ratio of total nonperforming assets
and accruing loans past due 90 days or
more to total loans outstanding at end
of period |
0.12 | % | 0.15 | % | ||||
Ratio of total nonperforming assets
and accruing loans past due 90 days or
more to total allowance for loan losses at
end of period |
10.4 | % | 12.5 | % | ||||
(1) | Interest income that would have been recorded during the first three months of 2005 related to nonaccrual loans was $15,000 compared to $41,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, none of which is included in interest income or net income for the applicable periods. |
Potential problem assets, which are not included in nonperforming assets, amounted to $402,000 at March 31, 2005 or 0.08% of total loans compared to $24,000 or 0.01% at December 31, 2004. Potential problem assets represent those assets with a well-defined weakness and where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrowers ability to comply with present repayment terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established by Pinnacle Nationals primary regulator for loans classified as substandard.
Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL). We maintain the ALL at a level that our management deems appropriate to adequately cover the inherent risks in the loan portfolio. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our allowance for loan losses was $6,198,000 and $5,650,000, respectively. Our management deemed these amounts to be adequate. The judgments and estimates associated with our ALL determination are described under Critical Accounting Estimates above.
Approximately 67.2% of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2005 and 66.7% at December 31, 2004 consisted of commercial loans. Using standard industry codes, we periodically analyze our loan position with respect to our borrowers industries to determine if a concentration of credit risk exists to any one or more industries. We do have a significant credit exposure of loans outstanding plus unfunded lines and letters of credit to borrowers in the trucking industry and to operators of nonresidential buildings at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Credit exposure to the trucking industry approximated $48.3 million at March 31, 2005 and $43.1 million at December 31, 2004. Credit exposure to operators of nonresidential buildings approximated $33.1 million at March 31, 2005 and $27.5 million at December 31, 2004. We evaluate our exposure level to these industry
Page 29
groups periodically in order to determine if additional allowance allocations are warranted. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we determined that we did not have any excessive exposure to any single industry which would warrant additional allowance allocations.
The following table sets forth, based on managements best estimate, the allocation of the ALL to types of loans as well as the unallocated portion as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and the percentage (%) of loans in each category to the total loans (dollars in thousands):
2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
$ | 1,224 | 23.7 | % | $ | 1,205 | 24.8 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate Construction |
245 | 4.8 | 188 | 1.8 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Other |
1,769 | 38.7 | 1,711 | 40.1 | ||||||||||||
Total commercial |
3,238 | 67.2 | 3,104 | 66.7 | ||||||||||||
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
1,042 | 28.2 | 869 | 26.9 | ||||||||||||
Consumer real estate Construction |
41 | 1.6 | 39 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Other |
470 | 3.0 | 396 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
Total consumer |
1,553 | 32.8 | 1,304 | 33.3 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
1,407 | NA | 1,242 | NA | ||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 6,198 | 100.0 | % | $ | 5,650 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004 and the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans as of the end of each period (dollars in thousands):
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 5,650 | $ | 3,719 | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
601 | 2,948 | ||||||
Charged-off loans: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
| | ||||||
Commercial real estate Construction |
| | ||||||
Commercial Other |
| | ||||||
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
(38 | ) | (884 | ) | ||||
Consumer real estate Construction |
| | ||||||
Consumer Other |
(30 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||
Total charged-off loans |
(68 | ) | (1,032 | ) | ||||
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans: |
||||||||
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
| | ||||||
Commercial real estate Construction |
| 2 | ||||||
Commercial Other |
2 | | ||||||
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
| | ||||||
Consumer real estate Construction |
| | ||||||
Consumer Other |
11 | 13 | ||||||
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans |
13 | 15 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 6,198 | $ | 5,650 | ||||
Ratio of the allowance for loan losses to
total loans outstanding at end of period |
1.20 | % | 1.20 | % | ||||
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans
outstanding for the period(1) |
0.04 | % | 0.27 | % | ||||
(1) | The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was computed by annualizing the net charge-off amount to a twelve-month period. |
Page 30
During the first three months of 2005, we charged-off $68,000 related to several consumer loans. As a relatively new institution, we do not have loss experience comparable to more mature financial institutions; however, as our loan portfolio matures, we will have additional charge-offs, and we will consider the amount and nature of our charge-offs in determining the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses.
Investments. The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of our securities at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
25,907 | 4 | 421 | 25,490 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
134,839 | 56 | 2,851 | 132,044 | ||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
15,086 | 18 | 211 | 14,893 | ||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
2,312 | | 90 | 2,220 | ||||||||||||
$ | 178,142 | $ | 78 | $ | 3,573 | $ | 174,647 | |||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
$ | 17,746 | $ | | $ | 548 | $ | 17,198 | ||||||||
State and municipal securities |
9,831 | | 305 | 9,526 | ||||||||||||
$ | 27,577 | $ | | $ | 853 | $ | 26,724 | |||||||||
December 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
27,165 | 129 | (20 | ) | 27,274 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
138,851 | 348 | (672 | ) | 138,527 | |||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
12,486 | 72 | (55 | ) | 12,503 | |||||||||||
Corporate notes |
2,315 | | (45 | ) | 2,270 | |||||||||||
$ | 180,817 | $ | 549 | $ | (792 | ) | $ | 180,574 | ||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
$ | 17,746 | $ | 1 | $ | (299 | ) | $ | 17,448 | |||||||
State and municipal securities |
9,850 | | (163 | ) | 9,687 | |||||||||||
$ | 27,596 | $ | 1 | $ | (462 | ) | $ | 27,135 | ||||||||
On March 31, 2004, Pinnacle National transferred $27.7 million of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity at fair value. The transfer consisted of substantially all of Pinnacle Nationals holdings of Tennessee municipal securities and several of its longer-term agency securities. These securities were selected for the held-to-maturity classification because we have the ability and intent to hold such securities until their maturity. The unrealized gain on such securities as of the date of transfer was $325,000. This amount is reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, and will be amortized over the remaining lives of the respective held-to-maturity securities. As of March 31, 2005, the remaining unamortized unrealized gain of the respective held-to-maturity securities was $270,000.
We realized approximately $114,000 in net gains from the sale of $6,792,000 of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $248,000 in net gains on the sale of $21,877,000 of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2004. Gross realized gains amounted to $114,000 on the sale of $6.7 million of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2005. Gross realized gains amounted to $312,000 on the sale of $10.9 million of available-for-sale securities
Page 31
while gross realized losses amounted to $64,000 on the sale of $11.0 million of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
The following table shows the carrying value of investment securities according to contractual maturity classifications of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, (3) after five years through ten years, and (4) after ten years. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities because the mortgages underlying the securities may be called or prepaid with or without penalty. Therefore, these securities are not included in the maturity categories noted below as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
U.S. government | State and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | agency | municipal | Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities | securities | securities | securities | Totals | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2005: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year to five years |
| | 2,922 | 3.5 | % | 2,112 | 4.5 | % | 2,220 | 3.4 | % | 7,254 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in five years to ten years |
| | 22,569 | 4.7 | % | 10,396 | 5.2 | % | | | 32,964 | 4.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
| | | | % | 2,385 | 5.5 | % | | | 2,385 | 5.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | | | % | $ | 25,490 | 4.5 | % | $ | 14,893 | 5.1 | % | $ | 2,220 | 3.4 | % | $ | 42,603 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | 189 | 4.1 | % | $ | | | % | $ | 189 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year to five years |
| | 15,750 | 4.2 | % | 3,059 | 4.9 | % | | | 18,801 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in five years to ten years |
| | 1,996 | 4.8 | % | 6,581 | 5.0 | % | | | 8,317 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
| | | | % | | | % | | | | | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | | | % | $ | 17,746 | 4.3 | % | $ | 9,830 | 5.0 | % | $ | | | % | $ | 27,596 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2004: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year to five years |
| | 2,982 | 3.5 | % | | | 2,270 | 3.4 | % | 5,252 | 3.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in five years to ten years |
| | 23,001 | 4.7 | % | 7,408 | 5.0 | % | | | 30,410 | 4.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
| | 1,291 | 5.5 | % | 5,094 | 5.4 | % | | | 6,385 | 5.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | | | % | $ | 27,274 | 4.6 | % | $ | 12,503 | 5.2 | % | $ | 2,270 | 3.4 | % | $ | 42,047 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year to five years |
| | 3,250 | 4.1 | % | 844 | 4.3 | % | | | 4,094 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in five years to ten years |
| | 14,546 | 4.3 | % | 7,953 | 5.0 | % | | | 22,450 | 4.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
| | | | % | 1,053 | 5.3 | % | | | 1,052 | 5.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | | | % | $ | 17,746 | 4.3 | % | $ | 9,850 | 5.0 | % | $ | | | % | $ | 27,596 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | We computed yields using coupon interest, adding discount accretion or subtracting premium amortization, as appropriate, on a ratable basis over the life of each security. We computed the weighted average yield for each maturity range using the acquisition price of each security in that range. |
Page 32
At March 31, 2005, the fair value of our mortgage-backed securities portfolio approximated $132.0 million compared to $138.5 million at December 31, 2004. All of these securities were included in our securities available-for-sale portfolio. A statistical comparison of our mortgage-backed portfolio at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 follows:
March 31, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | |||||||
Weighted average life |
4.62 years | 5.01 years | ||||||
Weighted average coupon |
5.21 | % | 5.18 | % | ||||
Tax equivalent yield |
4.35 | % | 4.46 | % | ||||
Modified duration (*) |
3.21 | % | 3.63 | % |
(*) Modified duration represents an approximation of the change in value of a security for every 100 basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates. |
At March 31, 2005, included in securities were the following investments with unrealized losses. The information below classifies these investments according to the term of the unrealized loss of less than twelve months or twelve months or longer (dollars in thousands):
Investments With an | Investments With an | Total Investments at | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized Loss of | Unrealized Loss of | March 31, 2005 With | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | an Unrealized Loss | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency securities |
$ | 41,516 | $ | 969 | $ | | $ | | $ | 41,516 | $ | 969 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
109,259 | 2,338 | 14,254 | 513 | 123,513 | 2,851 | ||||||||||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
16,188 | 468 | 1,059 | 47 | 17,247 | 515 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
1,753 | 69 | 467 | 22 | 2,220 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total temporarily-impaired securities |
$ | 168,716 | $ | 3,844 | $ | 15,780 | $ | 582 | $ | 184,496 | $ | 4,426 | ||||||||||||
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) our intent and ability to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. At March 31, 2005, we had several issuances that had been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months. At March 31, 2005, the amortized cost of these securities was approximately $16,362,000 compared to a fair value of $15,780,000. Because the declines in fair value noted above were attributable to increases in interest rates and not attributable to credit quality and because Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
Deposits and Other Borrowings. We had approximately $619 million of deposits at March 31, 2005 compared to $571 million at December 31, 2004. Our deposits consist of noninterest and interest-bearing demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and time deposits. Additionally, we entered into agreements with certain customers to sell certain of our securities under agreements to repurchase the security the following day. These agreements (which provide customers with short-term returns for their excess funds) amounted to $46.4 million at March 31, 2005 compared to $31.9 million at December 31, 2004. Additionally, at March 31 2005, we had borrowed $51.5 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati compared to $51.5 million at December 31, 2004.
Generally, banks classify their funding base as either core funding or non-core funding. Core funding consists of all deposits other than time deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or greater while all other funding is deemed to be non-core. The following table represents the balances of our deposits and other fundings and the percentage of each type to the total at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
Page 33
March 31, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Percentage | Amount | Percentage | |||||||||||||
Core funding: |
||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 119,212 | 16.4 | % | $ | 114,318 | 17.2 | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
57,113 | 7.9 | 51,752 | 7.8 | ||||||||||||
Savings and money market deposits |
207,535 | 28.5 | 199,058 | 29.9 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
42,694 | 5.9 | 39,805 | 5.9 | ||||||||||||
Total core funding |
426,554 | 58.7 | 404,933 | 60.8 | ||||||||||||
Non-core funding: |
||||||||||||||||
Time deposits greater than $100,000: |
||||||||||||||||
Public funds |
70,687 | 9.7 | 61,377 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||
Brokered deposits |
53,278 | 7.3 | 43,431 | 6.5 | ||||||||||||
Other time deposits greater than $100,000 |
68,502 | 9.4 | 60,986 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
46,388 | 6.4 | 31,928 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
51,500 | 7.1 | 53,500 | 8.0 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310 | 1.4 | 10,310 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Total non-core funding |
300,665 | 41.3 | 261,532 | 39.2 | ||||||||||||
Total deposits and other funding |
$ | 727,219 | 100.0 | % | $ | 666,465 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The amount of time deposits issued in amounts of $100,000 or more as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 amounted to $192.5 million and $165.8 million, respectively. The following table shows our time deposits over $100,000 by category at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, based on time remaining until maturity of (1) three months or less, (2) over three but less than six months, (3) over six but less than twelve months and (4) over twelve months (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | |||||||
Three months or less |
$ | 50,138 | $ | 54,274 | ||||
Over three but less than six months |
60,187 | 35,824 | ||||||
Over six but less than twelve months |
29,765 | 27,627 | ||||||
Over twelve months |
52,377 | 48,069 | ||||||
Total time deposits greater than $100,000 |
$ | 192,467 | $ | 165,794 | ||||
Subordinated debt. In 2003, we established PNFP Statutory Trust I (Trust), a wholly-owned statutory business trust. Pinnacle Financial is the sole sponsor of the trust and owns $310,000 of the Trusts common securities. The Trust was created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities (Trust Preferred Securities) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 and using the proceeds from the issuance of the common and preferred securities to purchase $10,310,000 of junior subordinated debentures (Subordinated Debentures) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trust are the Subordinated Debentures. Pinnacle Financials $310,000 investment in the Trust is included in other assets and the $10,310,000 obligation of Pinnacle Financial is included in subordinated debt.
The Trust Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption. Pinnacle Financial guarantees the payment of distributions and payments for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the Trust. Pinnacle Financials obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trust under the Trust Preferred Securities.
The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured, bear an interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (equal to the spread paid by the Trust on the Trust Preferred Securities) which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. Interest is payable quarterly. Pinnacle Financial may defer the payment of interest at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that the deferral period does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and Pinnacle Financials ability to pay dividends on our common shares will be restricted.
Page 34
Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred Securities may be redeemed prior to maturity at our option on or after September 17, 2008. The Trust Preferred Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in the event of unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to federal income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the parent company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming non-deductible for federal tax purposes, (3) the requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or (4) loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as Tier I capital under the Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.
Capital Resources. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our stockholders equity amounted to $57.7 million and $57.9 million, respectively. The change in stockholders equity between December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 was attributable to our net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 of $1.8 million and the net decrease in comprehensive income of $2.0 million attributable to the decrease in the unrealized fair value of our available-for-sale securities portfolio. Additionally, during the first three months of 2005, we received approximately $8,000 in proceeds from our associates through the exercise of incentive stock options granted to them previously.
Generally, banking laws and regulations require banks and bank holding companies to maintain certain minimum capital ratios in order to engage in certain activities or be eligible for certain types of regulatory relief. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our capital ratios, including Pinnacle Nationals capital ratios, met regulatory minimum capital requirements. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Pinnacle National was categorized as well-capitalized. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle National must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. Additionally, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National must maintain certain minimum capital ratios for regulatory purposes. The following table presents actual, minimum and well-capitalized capital amounts and ratios at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:
Minimum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
To Be Well-Capitalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum | Under Prompt | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital | Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Requirement | Action Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
At March 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 76,165 | 11.5 | % | $ | 53,031 | 8.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 68,235 | 10.3 | % | $ | 52,919 | 8.0 | % | $ | 66,148 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 69,967 | 10.6 | % | $ | 26,516 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 62,027 | 9.4 | % | $ | 26,459 | 4.0 | % | $ | 39,689 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 69,967 | 9.4 | % | $ | 30,275 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 62,027 | 8.2 | % | $ | 30,165 | 4.0 | % | $ | 37,706 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 73,540 | 12.7 | % | $ | 46,410 | 8.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 63,775 | 11.0 | % | $ | 46,373 | 8.0 | % | $ | 57,967 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 67,880 | 11.7 | % | $ | 23,205 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 58,115 | 10.0 | % | $ | 23,187 | 4.0 | % | $ | 34,780 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 67,880 | 9.7 | % | $ | 28,134 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 58,115 | 8.3 | % | $ | 28,116 | 4.0 | % | $ | 35,145 | 5.0 | % |
(*) | Average assets for the above calculations were as of the most recent quarter for each period noted. |
Dividends. Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial under federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the OCC. We, in turn, are also subject to limits on payment of dividends to our shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of federal banking authorities. We have not paid any dividends to date, nor do we anticipate paying dividends to our shareholders for the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy will depend on Pinnacle Nationals earnings, capital position, financial condition and other factors.
Page 35
Return on Assets and Stockholders Equity. The following table shows return on average assets (net income divided by average total assets), return on average equity (net income divided by average stockholders equity), dividend payout ratio (dividends declared per share divided by net income per share) and stockholders equity to asset ratio (average stockholders equity divided by average total assets) for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004.
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Return on average assets |
0.96 | % | 0.89 | % | ||||
Return on average equity |
12.48 | % | 12.31 | % | ||||
Dividend payout ratio |
| % | | % | ||||
Average equity to average assets ratio |
7.72 | % | 7.23 | % |
(1) | The return on average assets and return on average equity for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was computed by annualizing the numerator to a twelve-month period. |
Market and Liquidity Risk Management
Our objective is to manage assets and liabilities to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies. Our Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is charged with the responsibility of monitoring these policies, which are designed to ensure acceptable composition of asset/liability mix. Two critical areas of focus for ALCO are interest rate sensitivity and liquidity risk management.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk arising from fluctuations in interest rates. ALCO measures and evaluates the interest rate risk so that we can meet customer demands for various types of loans and deposits. ALCO determines the most appropriate amounts of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet items. Measurements which we use to help us manage interest rate sensitivity include an earnings simulation model, an economic value of equity model, and gap analysis computations. These measurements are used in conjunction with competitive pricing analysis.
Earnings simulation model. We believe that interest rate risk is best measured by our earnings simulation modeling. Forecasted levels of earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities, and off-balance sheet financial instruments are combined with ALCO forecasts of interest rates for the next 12 months and are combined with other factors in order to produce various earnings simulations. To limit interest rate risk, we have guidelines for our earnings at risk which seek to limit the variance of net income to less than 10 percent for a 200 basis point change up or down in rates from managements most likely interest rate forecast over the next twelve months. The results of our current simulation model would indicate that our net interest income should increase with a gradual rise in interest rates over the next twelve months and decrease should interest rates fall over the same period.
Economic value of equity. Our economic value of equity model measures the extent that estimated economic values of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items will change as a result of interest rate changes. Economic values are determined by discounting expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, which establishes a base case economic value of equity. To help limit interest rate risk, we have a guideline stating that for an instantaneous 200 basis point change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity will not change by more than 20 percent from the base case.
Gap analysis. An asset or liability is considered to be interest rate-sensitive if it will reprice or mature within the time period analyzed; for example, within three months or one year. The interest rate-sensitivity gap is the difference between the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or reprice within such time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities (i.e., asset sensitive). A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the interest rate-sensitive assets (i.e., liability sensitive). During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while
Page 36
a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If our assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of any increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal. To assist us in managing our interest rate sensitivity, we have established a cumulative twelve-month interest rate-sensitivity gap ratio of earning assets to interest bearing liabilities of 75% to 125% in this time horizon.
Each of the above analyses may not, on their own, be an accurate indicator of how our net interest income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as interest rate caps and floors) which limit changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the maturity of certain instruments. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising interest rates. ALCO reviews each of the above interest rate sensitivity analyses along with several different interest rate scenarios as part of its responsibility to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies.
We may also use derivative financial instruments to improve the balance between interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and as one tool to manage our interest rate sensitivity while continuing to meet the credit and deposit needs of our customers. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had not entered into any derivative contracts to assist managing our interest rate sensitivity.
Liquidity Risk Management. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that there are sufficient cash flows to satisfy loan demand, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs. Traditional sources of liquidity for a bank include asset maturities and growth in core deposits. A bank may achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of its assets and liabilities and by internally generated funding through its operations. Funds invested in marketable instruments that can be readily sold and the continuous maturing of other earning assets are sources of liquidity from an asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of liquidity through attraction of increased deposits and borrowing funds from various other institutions.
Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in response to market rates and our management intends to continue this practice. If deposits are not priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect our liquidity position.
Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions and competition. Additionally, debt security investments are subject to prepayment and call provisions that could accelerate their payoff prior to stated maturity. We attempt to price our deposit products to meet our asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions. Our ALCO is responsible for monitoring our ongoing liquidity needs. Our regulators also monitor our liquidity and capital resources on a periodic basis.
In addition, Pinnacle National is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. As a result, Pinnacle National receives advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, pursuant to the terms of various borrowing agreements, which assist it in the funding of its home mortgage and commercial real estate loan portfolios. Pinnacle National has pledged under the borrowing agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati certain qualifying residential mortgage loans and, pursuant to a blanket lien, all qualifying commercial mortgage loans as collateral. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle National had received advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati totaling $51.5 million at the following rates and maturities (dollars in thousands):
Page 37
Amount | Interest Rate | |||||||
June 14, 2005 |
$ | 12,000 | 2.94 | % | ||||
September 15, 2005 |
5,000 | 3.15 | ||||||
October 14, 2005 |
3,000 | 3.10 | ||||||
December 30, 2005 |
3,000 | 2.40 | ||||||
January 27, 2006 |
2,000 | 2.79 | ||||||
March 12, 2006 |
3,000 | 1.97 | ||||||
March 31, 2006 |
4,000 | 2.10 | ||||||
April 17, 2006 |
2,000 | 2.64 | ||||||
April 28, 2006 |
1,500 | 2.52 | ||||||
May 19, 2006 |
10,000 | 3.01 | ||||||
September 30, 2006 |
4,000 | 2.39 | ||||||
January 26, 2007 |
2,000 | 3.24 | ||||||
$ | 51,500 | |||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
2.77 | % | ||||||
At March 31, 2005, brokered certificates of deposit approximated $53.3 million which represented 7.3% of total fundings compared to $43.4 million and 6.5% at December 31, 2004. We issue these brokered certificates through several different brokerage houses based on competitive bid. Typically, these funds are for varying maturities from six months to two years and are issued at rates which are competitive to rates we would be required to pay to attract similar deposits from the local market as well as rates for Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati advances of similar maturities. We consider these deposits to be a ready source of liquidity under current market conditions.
At March 31, 2005, we had no significant commitments for capital expenditures. However, we are in the process of developing our branch network in Davidson, Williamson and Sumner counties. As a result, we anticipate that we will enter into contracts to buy property or construct branch facilities and/or lease agreements to lease facilities in Davidson, Williamson and Sumner counties.
The following table presents additional information about our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2005, which by their terms have contractual maturity and termination dates subsequent to March 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):
Next 12 | 13-36 | 37-60 | More than | |||||||||||||||||
Months | Months | Months | 60 Months | Totals | ||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
$ | 171,804 | $ | 55,705 | $ | 7,652 | $ | | $ | 235,161 | ||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
46,388 | | | | 46,388 | |||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
32,000 | 19,500 | | | 51,500 | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
| | | 10,310 | 10,310 | |||||||||||||||
Minimum operating lease commitments |
795 | 1,660 | 1,754 | 2,034 | 6,243 | |||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 250,987 | $ | 76,865 | $ | 9,406 | $ | 12,344 | $ | 349,602 | ||||||||||
Our management believes that we have adequate liquidity to meet all known contractual obligations and unfunded commitments, including loan commitments and reasonable borrower, depositor, and creditor requirements over the next twelve months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. At March 31, 2005, we had outstanding standby letters of credit of $51.4 million and unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $209.5 million. Because these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed to fund these outstanding commitments, Pinnacle National has the ability to liquidate Federal funds sold or securities available-for-sale, or on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase Federal funds from other financial institutions. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle National had accommodations with upstream correspondent banks for unsecured short-term advances. These accommodations have various covenants related to their term and availability, and in most cases must be repaid within less than a month. The following table presents additional information about our unfunded commitments as of March 31, 2005, which by their terms have contractual maturity dates subsequent to March 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):
Page 38
Next 12 | 13-36 | 37-60 | More than | |||||||||||||||||
Months | Months | Months | 60 Months | Totals | ||||||||||||||||
Unfunded commitments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
$ | 43,082 | $ | 8,348 | $ | | $ | | $ | 51,430 | ||||||||||
Lines of credit |
103,753 | 53,507 | 10,205 | 42,079 | 209,544 | |||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 146,835 | $ | 61,855 | $ | 10,205 | $ | 42,079 | $ | 260,974 | ||||||||||
Impact of Inflation
The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institutions performance than the effects of general levels of inflation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether impairment is other-than-temporary, and measurement of an impairment loss. An investment is considered impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost. Generally, an impairment is considered other-than-temporary unless: (i) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment; and (ii) evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. If impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss should be recognized equal to the difference between the investments cost and its fair value. Certain disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 were adopted in 2003 and Pinnacle Financial began presenting the new disclosure requirements in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. The recognition and measurement provisions were initially effective for other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. However, in September 2004, the effective date of these provisions was delayed until the finalization of a FASB Staff Position (FSP) to provide additional implementation guidance. Due to the recognition and measurement provisions being suspended and the final rule delayed, we are not able to determine whether the adoption of these new provisions will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of income.
Statement of Position 03-03, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-03) addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investors initial investment in loans or debt securities (loans) acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in purchase business combinations and applies to all nongovernmental entities, including not-for-profit organizations. The SOP does not apply to loans originated by the entity. The SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. Early adoption is encouraged. Specific transition guidance applies to certain loans that currently are within the scope of Practice Bulletin 6, Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans. Adoption of SOP 03-03 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of Pinnacle Financial.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which revised SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. This statement supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The revised statement addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees and other third parties, eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB 25 and requires that the compensation costs relating to such transactions be recognized in the consolidated statement of income. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission deferred implementation of SFAS No. 123R for registrants until the next fiscal year following June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and will adopt it on January 1, 2006 as required.
Page 39
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by this Item 3 is included on pages 36 through 39 of Item 2 - Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pinnacle Financial maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Pinnacle Financials management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pinnacle Financial carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Pinnacle Financials disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial reporting during Pinnacle Financials fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial reporting.
Page 40
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which any of their property is the subject.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) Not applicable
(b) Not applicable
(c) The Company did not repurchase any shares of the Companys common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2005
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
3.1 | Amended and Restated Charter of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., as amended
(Restated for SEC electronic filing purposes only) |
|||
10.1 | 2005 Annual Cash Incentive Plan* |
|||
10.2 | Fourth amendment to Commerce Street Lease |
|||
31.1 | Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|||
31.2 | Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) |
|||
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
* | Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and are subject to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
Page 41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. |
||||
/s/ M. Terry Turner | ||||
M. Terry Turner | ||||
May 6, 2005 | President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
/s/ Harold R. Carpenter | ||||
Harold R. Carpenter | ||||
May 6, 2005 | Chief Financial Officer | |||
Page 42