Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005

Commission File No: 000-31225

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Tennessee   62-1812853
     
(State or jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)    

The Commerce Center, 211 Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee 37201
(Address of principal executive offices)

(615) 744-3700
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address
and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes x     No o

As of April 30, 2005, there were 8,397,601 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, issued and outstanding.

 


Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
Report on Form 10-Q
March 31, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

         
    Page No.  
PART I:
       
    3  
    18  
    40  
    40  
PART II:
       
    41  
    41  
    41  
    41  
    41  
    41  
    42  
 EX-3.1 AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER
 EX-10.1 2005 ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE PLAN
 EX-10.2 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO COMMERCE STREET LEASE
 EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
 EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
 EX-32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
 EX-32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (“Pinnacle Financial”) may from time to time make written or oral statements, including statements contained in this report which may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). The words “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “consider”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “should”, “estimate”, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements should be considered subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Pinnacle Financial’s actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Such factors are described below and in addition to those set out in Pinnacle Financial’s Form 10-K include, without limitation, (i) unanticipated deterioration in the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant increases in loan losses and provisions for those losses, (ii) increased competition with other financial institutions, (iii) lack of sustained growth in the economy in the Nashville, Tennessee area, (iv) rapid fluctuations or unanticipated changes in interest rates, (v) the inability of our bank subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank to satisfy regulatory requirements for its expansion plans, and (vi) changes in the legislative and regulatory environment, including compliance with the various provisions of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. Many of such factors are beyond Pinnacle Financial’s ability to control or predict, and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Pinnacle Financial does not intend to update or reissue any forward-looking statements contained in this report as a result of new information or other circumstances that may become known to Pinnacle Financial.

Page 2


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2005     2004  
ASSETS
               
Cash and noninterest-bearing due from banks
  $ 19,956,737     $ 15,243,796  
Interest-bearing due from banks
    444,090       379,047  
Federal funds sold
    24,528,028       11,122,944  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents
    44,928,855       26,745,787  
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value
    174,646,784       180,573,820  
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $26,723,605 and $27,134,913 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively)
    27,576,457       27,596,159  
Mortgage loans held-for-sale
    2,837,900       1,634,900  
Loans
    516,733,302       472,362,219  
Less allowance for loan losses
    (6,197,895 )     (5,650,014 )
 
           
Loans, net
    510,535,407       466,712,205  
Premises and equipment, net
    11,582,991       11,130,671  
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiary and other entities
    3,929,811       3,907,807  
Accrued interest receivable
    3,124,989       2,639,548  
Other assets
    8,272,424       6,198,553  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 787,435,618     $ 727,139,450  
 
           
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Deposits:
               
Noninterest-bearing demand
  $ 119,212,181     $ 114,318,024  
Interest-bearing demand
    57,112,842       51,751,320  
Savings and money market accounts
    207,534,995       199,058,240  
Time
    235,160,749       205,599,425  
 
           
Total deposits
    619,020,767       570,727,009  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    46,388,184       31,927,860  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    51,500,000       53,500,000  
Subordinated debt
    10,310,000       10,310,000  
Accrued interest payable
    937,207       769,300  
Other liabilities
    1,622,480       2,025,106  
 
           
Total liabilities
    729,778,638       669,259,275  
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
           
Common stock, par value $1.00; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 8,391,371 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2005 and 8,389,232 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2004
    8,391,371       8,389,232  
Additional paid-in capital
    44,388,278       44,376,307  
Unearned compensation
    (29,750 )     (37,250 )
Retained earnings
    6,906,776       5,127,023  
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net
    (1,999,695 )     24,863  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    57,656,980       57,880,175  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 787,435,618     $ 727,139,450  
 
           

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 3


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)

                 
    Three months ended  
    March 31,  
    2005     2004  
Interest income:
               
Loans, including fees
  $ 6,954,365     $ 3,946,572  
Securities:
               
Taxable
    2,021,783       1,550,859  
Tax-exempt
    201,424       85,975  
Federal funds sold and other
    92,162       82,716  
 
           
Total interest income
    9,269,734       5,666,122  
 
           
Interest expense:
               
Deposits
    2,153,961       1,171,188  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    150,262       9,293  
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings
    462,537       333,349  
 
           
Total interest expense
    2,766,761       1,513,830  
 
           
Net interest income
    6,502,973       4,152,292  
Provision for loan losses
    601,250       353,848  
 
           
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    5,901,723       3,798,444  
Noninterest income:
               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    261,700       163,845  
Investment sales commissions
    437,424       389,579  
Gain on loans and loan participations sold, net
    160,555       219,620  
Gain on sales of investment securities, net
    114,410       248,353  
Other noninterest income
    203,710       110,042  
 
           
Total noninterest income
    1,177,799       1,131,439  
 
           
Noninterest expense:
               
Compensation and employee benefits
    2,970,558       2,173,425  
Equipment and occupancy
    784,026       505,690  
Marketing and other business development
    113,168       149,158  
Postage and supplies
    135,538       99,138  
Other noninterest expense
    577,584       391,468  
 
           
Total noninterest expense
    4,580,874       3,318,879  
 
           
Income before income taxes
    2,498,648       1,611,014  
Income tax expense
    718,895       539,992  
 
           
Net income
  $ 1,779,753     $ 1,071,022  
 
           
Per share information:
               
Basic net income per common share
  $ 0.21     $ 0.15  
 
           
Diluted net income per common share
  $ 0.19     $ 0.13  
 
           
Weighted average shares outstanding:
               
Basic
    8,389,256       7,384,106  
Diluted
    9,437,183       8,213,730  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 4


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)

For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004

                                                         
                                    Retained     Accumulated        
    Common Stock     Additional             Earnings     Other     Total  
                    Paid-in     Unearned     (Accumulated     Comprehensive     Stockholders'  
    Shares     Amount     Capital     Compensation     Deficit)     Income (Loss)     Equity  
Balances, December 31, 2003
    7,384,106     $ 7,384,106     $ 26,990,894     $     $ (189,155 )   $ 150,536     $ 34,336,381  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net income
                            1,071,022             1,071,022  
Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax expense of $533,648
                                  858,884       858,884  
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                                    1,930,106  
 
                                         
Balances, March 31, 2004
    7,384,106     $ 7,384,106     $ 26,990,894     $     $ 881,867     $ 1,009,420     $ 36,266,287  
 
                                         
Balances, December 31, 2004
    8,389,232     $ 8,389,232     $ 44,376,307     $ (37,250 )   $ 5,127,023     $ 24,863     $ 57,880,175  
Exercise of employee incentive common stock options
    2,139       2,139       11,971                         14,110  
Amortization of unearned compensation associated with restricted shares
                      7,500                   7,500  
Comprehensive loss:
                                                       
Net income
                            1,779,753             1,779,753  
Net unrealized holding losses on available-for-sale securities, net of deferred tax benefit of $1,240,860
                                  (2,024,558 )     (2,024,558 )
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive loss
                                                    (223,195 )
 
                                         
Balances, March 31, 2005
    8,391,371     $ 8,391,371     $ 44,388,278     $ (29,750 )   $ 6,906,776     $ (1,999,695 )   $ 57,656,980  
 
                                         

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 5


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

                 
    Three months ended  
    March 31,  
    2005     2004  
Operating activities:
               
Net income
  $ 1,779,753     $ 1,071,022  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
               
Net amortization of securities
    244,147       189,637  
Depreciation and amortization
    339,766       259,935  
Provision for loan losses
    601,250       353,848  
Gain on sale of investment securities, net
    (114,410 )     (248,353 )
Loss (gain) on participations sold
    14,991       (121,617 )
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
    (331,494 )     (320,638 )
Mortgage loans held for sale:
               
Loans originated
    (21,360,167 )     (10,844,562 )
Loans sold
    20,157,167       8,369,840  
(Increase) decrease in other assets
    (740,234 )     12,835  
Decrease in other liabilities
    (234,719 )     (1,979,888 )
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    356,050       (3,257,941 )
 
           
Investing activities:
               
Activities in securities available-for-sale:
               
Purchases
    (10,285,511 )     (51,539,860 )
Sales
    6,791,867       21,876,953  
Maturities, prepayments and calls
    6,045,226       9,012,617  
Net increase in loans
    (44,424,452 )     (26,441,559 )
Purchases of premises and equipment and software
    (1,046,404 )     (219,717 )
Purchases of other assets
    (21,900 )     (289,800 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (42,941,174 )     (47,601,366 )
 
           
Financing activities:
               
Net increase in deposits
    48,293,758       47,031,755  
Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    14,460,324       (350,928 )
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank:
               
Issuances
    12,000,000       4,000,000  
Payments
    (14,000,000 )     (8,000,000 )
Exercise of common stock options
    14,110        
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    60,768,192       42,680,827  
 
           
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    18,183,068       (8,178,480 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    26,745,787       47,184,050  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 44,928,855     $ 39,005,570  
 
           

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Page 6


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

     Nature of Business — Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) was formed on February 28, 2000 (inception) and is a bank holding company whose primary business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank (Pinnacle National). Pinnacle National is a commercial bank located in Nashville, Tennessee. Pinnacle National provides a full range of banking services in its primary market area of Davidson County and the surrounding counties. Pinnacle National commenced its banking operations on October 27, 2000. PFP Title Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle National. PFP Title Company sells title insurance policies to Pinnacle National customers and others. PNFP Holdings, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PFP Title Company and is the parent of PNFP Properties, Inc., which was established as a Real Estate Investment Trust pursuant to Internal Revenue Service regulations. Pinnacle Community Development, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle National and is certified as a Community Development Entity by the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund of the United States Department of the Treasury. PNFP Statutory Trust I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle Financial, was created for the exclusive purpose of issuing capital trust preferred securities. Pinnacle Advisory Services, Inc. was established as a registered investment advisor pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Pinnacle Credit Enhancement Holdings, Inc. was established as a holding company to own a 24.5% membership interest in Collateral Plus, LLC. Collateral Plus, LLC serves as an intermediary between investors and borrowers in certain financial transactions whereby the borrowers require enhanced collateral in the form of letters of credit issued by the investors for the benefit of banks and other financial institutions.

     Basis of Presentation — These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pinnacle Financial and its subsidiaries. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation, other than the accounts of PNFP Statutory Trust I which are included in these consolidated financial statements pursuant to the equity method of accounting.

     The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2005. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Pinnacle Financial’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

     Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses.

     Cash and Cash Flows — Cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, amounts due from banks, Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, with original maturities within ninety days, are included in cash and cash equivalents. The following supplemental cash flow information addresses certain cash payments and noncash transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 as follows:

Page 7


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                 
    For the three months ended March 31,  
    2005     2004  
Cash Payments:
               
Interest
  $ 2,598,854     $ 1,439,283  
Income taxes
    690,000       1,226,817  
Noncash Transactions:
               
Transfers of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity
          27,655,669  
Loans charged-off to the allowance for loan losses
    67,777       32,489  
Loans foreclosed upon with repossessions transferred to other assets
    34,750        

     Income Per Common Share — Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted. The difference between basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding was attributable to common stock options and warrants.

     As of March 31, 2005 and 2004, there were common stock options outstanding to purchase up to 1,211,393 and 1,010,490 common shares, respectively. Substantially all of these shares have exercise prices, which when considered in relation to the average market price of Pinnacle Financial’s common stock for the respective reporting period, are considered dilutive and are considered in Pinnacle Financial’s diluted income per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. Additionally, as of March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial had dilutive warrants outstanding to purchase 406,000 common shares which have also been considered in the calculation of Pinnacle Financial’s diluted income per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.

     The following is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

                 
    2005     2004  
Basic earnings per share calculation:
               
Numerator – Net income
  $ 1,779,753     $ 1,071,022  
Denominator – Average common shares outstanding
    8,389,256       7,384,106  
Basic net income per share
  $ 0.21     $ 0.15  
Diluted earnings per share calculation:
               
Numerator – Net income
  $ 1,779,753     $ 1,071,022  
Denominator – Average common shares outstanding
    8,389,256       7,384,106  
Dilutive shares contingently issuable
    1,047,927       829,624  
 
           
Average dilutive common shares outstanding
    9,437,183       8,213,730  
Diluted net income per share
  $ 0.19     $ 0.13  

     On April 20, 2004, the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Financial approved a two for one stock split of the Company’s common stock payable as a 100% stock dividend on May 10, 2004 to shareholders of record on April 30, 2004. Pinnacle Financial has retroactively applied the impact of this stock split in these consolidated financial statements.

     Stock-Based Compensation — Pinnacle Financial applies APB Opinion 25 and related interpretations in accounting for the equity incentive plans. All option grants carry exercise prices equal to or above the fair value of the common stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized. Had compensation cost for Pinnacle Financial’s equity incentive plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plans consistent with the method prescribed in SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” Pinnacle Financial’s net income per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:

Page 8


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

                         
            2005     2004  
Net income, as reported
          $ 1,779,753     $ 1,071,022  
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects
      (111,072 )     (66,620 )
 
                   
Pro forma net income
          $ 1,668,681     $ 1,004,402  
 
                   
Per share information:
                       
Basic net income
  As reported   $ 0.21     $ 0.15  
 
  Pro forma   $ 0.20     $ 0.14  
Diluted net income
  As reported   $ 0.19     $ 0.13  
 
  Pro forma   $ 0.18     $ 0.12  

     For purposes of these calculations, the fair value of options granted for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:

                 
    2005     2004  
Risk free interest rate
    2.26 %     1.00 %
Expected life of the options
  5.0 years   5.0 years
Expected dividend yield
    0.00 %     0.00 %
Expected volatility
    39.3 %     26.7 %
Weighted average fair value
  $ 9.00     $ 6.30  

     Recent Accounting Pronouncements — In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether impairment is other-than-temporary, and measurement of an impairment loss. An investment is considered impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost. Generally, an impairment is considered other-than-temporary unless: (i) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment; and (ii) evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. If impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss should be recognized equal to the difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value. Certain disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 were adopted in 2003 and Pinnacle Financial began presenting the new disclosure requirements in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. The recognition and measurement provisions were initially effective for other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. However, in September 2004, the effective date of these provisions was delayed until the finalization of a FASB Staff Position (FSP) to provide additional implementation guidance. Due to the recognition and measurement provisions being suspended and the final rule delayed, Pinnacle Financial is not able to determine whether the adoption of these new provisions will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of income.

     Statement of Position 03-03, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-03) addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor’s initial investment in loans or debt securities (loans) acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in purchase business combinations and applies to all nongovernmental entities, including not-for-profit organizations. The SOP does not apply to loans originated by the entity. The SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. Early adoption is encouraged. Specific transition guidance applies to certain loans that currently are within the scope of Practice Bulletin 6, Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans. Adoption did not have a material impact on the 2005 consolidated financial position or results of operations of Pinnacle Financial.

     In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123R”), which revised SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. This statement supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” The

Page 9


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

revised statement addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees and other third parties, eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB 25 and requires that the compensation costs relating to such transactions be recognized in the consolidated statement of income. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission deferred implementation of SFAS No. 123R for registrants until the next fiscal year following June 15, 2005. Pinnacle Financial is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and will adopt it on January 1, 2006 as required.

     Business Segments — Pinnacle Financial operates in one business segment, commercial banking, and has no individually significant business segments.

     Comprehensive Income (Loss) — Other comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under United States generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income. Currently, Pinnacle Financial’s other comprehensive income (loss) consists of unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, on available-for-sale securities.

     Reclassifications – Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income or loss during any period. In the statements of income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, Pinnacle Financial has reclassified noninterest income previously reported as “Fees from the origination of mortgage loans” to “Gain on loans and loan participations sold”. Additionally, sales commission expenses associated with mortgage loan originations previously included in “Compensation and employee benefits” have been reclassified to offset mortgage origination fees included in noninterest income as “Gain on loans and loan participations sold”.

Note 2. Securities

     The amortized cost and fair value of securities at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are summarized as follows:

                                 
    March 31, 2005  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Securities available-for-sale:
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $     $     $     $  
U.S. government agency securities
    25,906,973       4,087       420,757       25,490,303  
Mortgage-backed securities
    134,838,692       55,446       2,850,607       132,043,531  
State and municipal securities
    15,085,023       18,005       210,328       14,892,700  
Corporate notes
    2,311,283             91,033       2,220,250  
 
                       
 
  $ 178,141,971     $ 77,538     $ 3,572,725     $ 174,646,784  
 
                       
Securities held-to-maturity:
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 17,746,618     $     $ 548,643     $ 17,197,975  
State and municipal securities
    9,829,839             304,209       9,525,630  
 
                       
 
  $ 27,576,457     $     $ 852,852     $ 26,723,605  
 
                       
                                 
    December 31, 2004  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Securities available-for-sale:
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $     $     $     $  
U.S. government agency securities
    27,164,683       129,219       19,727       27,274,175  
Mortgage-backed securities
    138,851,236       348,187       672,189       138,527,234  
State and municipal securities
    12,486,440       71,726       55,481       12,502,685  
Corporate notes
    2,314,831             45,105       2,269,726  
 
                       
 
  $ 180,817,190     $ 549,132     $ 792,502     $ 180,573,820  
 
                       
Securities held-to-maturity:
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 17,746,555     $ 600     $ 298,605     $ 17,448,550  
State and municipal securities
    9,849,604             163,241       9,686,363  
 
                       
 
  $ 27,596,159     $ 600     $ 461,846     $ 27,134,913  
 
                       

Page 10


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     On March 31, 2004, Pinnacle National transferred approximately $27,656,000 of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity at fair value. The transfer consisted of substantially all of Pinnacle National’s holdings of Tennessee municipal securities and several of its longer-term agency securities. The net unrealized gain on such securities as of the date of transfer was approximately $325,000. This amount is reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, and is being amortized over the remaining lives of the respective held-to-maturity securities. At March 31, 2005, the unamortized amount approximated $270,000.

     Pinnacle Financial realized approximately $114,000 in net gains from the sale of $6,792,000 of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $248,000 in net gains on the sale of $21,877,000 of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2004. Gross realized gains amounted to $114,000 on the sale of $6.8 million of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2005. Gross realized gains amounted to $312,000 on the sale of $10.9 million of available-for-sale securities while gross realized losses amounted to $64,000 on the sale of $11.0 million of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2004.

     At March 31, 2005, approximately $148,004,000 of Pinnacle Financial’s securities portfolio was pledged to secure public fund deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

     At March 31, 2005, included in securities were the following investments with unrealized losses. The information below classifies these investments according to the term of the unrealized loss of less than twelve months or twelve months or longer:

                                                 
    Investments With an     Investments With an     Total Investments at  
    Unrealized Loss of     Unrealized Loss of     March 31, 2005 With  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or longer     an Unrealized Loss  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 41,516,118     $ 969,400     $     $     $ 41,516,118     $ 969,400  
Mortgage-backed securities
    109,258,581       2,338,024       14,254,851       512,584       123,513,432       2,850,608  
State and municipal securities
    16,187,448       467,610       1,058,491       46,927       17,245,939       514,537  
Corporate notes
    1,753,451       68,505       466,800       22,527       2,220,251       91,032  
 
                                   
Total temporarily-impaired securities
  $ 168,715,597     $ 3,843,539     $ 15,780,142     $ 582,038     $ 184,495,740     $ 4,425,577  
 
                                   

     Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of Pinnacle Financial to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial had several issuances that had been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months. At March 31, 2005, the amortized cost of these securities was approximately $16,362,000 compared to a fair value of $15,780,000. Because the declines in fair value noted above were attributable to increases in interest rates and not attributable to credit quality and because Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Page 11


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 3. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

     The composition of loans at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 is summarized as follows:

                 
    2005     2004  
Commercial real estate – Mortgage
  $ 122,639,178     $ 117,122,607  
Commercial real estate – Construction
    24,455,961       8,427,763  
Commercial – Other
    200,053,947       189,456,385  
 
           
Total Commercial
    347,149,086       315,006,755  
 
           
Consumer real estate – Mortgage
    145,675,571       126,907,581  
Consumer real estate – Construction
    8,380,235       14,990,739  
Consumer – Other
    15,528,410       15,457,144  
 
           
Total Consumer
    169,584,216       157,355,464  
 
           
Total Loans
    516,733,302       472,362,219  
Allowance for loan losses
    (6,197,895 )     (5,650,014 )
 
           
Loans, net
  $ 510,535,407     $ 466,712,205  
 
           

     Using standard industry codes, Pinnacle Financial periodically analyzes its commercial loan portfolio to determine if a concentration of credit risk exists to any one or more industries. Pinnacle Financial has a meaningful credit exposure (loans outstanding plus unfunded lines of credit) to borrowers in the trucking industry and to operators of nonresidential buildings. Credit exposure to the trucking industry approximated $48.3 million and $43.1 million, while credit exposure to operators of nonresidential buildings approximated $33.1 million and $27.5 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Levels of exposure to these industry groups are periodically evaluated in order to determine if additional allowance allocations are warranted.

     Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and for the year ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                 
    2005     2004  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 5,650,014     $ 3,718,598  
Charged-off loans
    (67,777 )     (1,032,378 )
Recovery of previously charged-off loans
    14,408       15,371  
Provision for loan losses
    601,250       2,948,423  
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 6,197,895     $ 5,650,014  
 
           

     At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $5,942,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities of which $3,883,000 had been drawn upon. At December 31, 2004, Pinnacle Financial had granted loans and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $6,565,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities, of which $4,437,000 had been drawn upon. The terms on these loans and extensions are on substantially the same terms customary for other persons for the type of loan involved.

     At March 31, 2005 and 2004, Pinnacle Financial had certain impaired loans on nonaccruing interest status. The principal balance of these nonaccrual loans amounted to $561,000 and $86,000 at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. In each case, at the date such loans were placed on nonaccrual, Pinnacle Financial reversed all previously accrued interest income against current year earnings. Had these loans been on accruing status, interest income would have been higher by $15,000 and $1,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Page 12


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 4. Income Taxes

     Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 consists of the following:

                 
    2005     2004  
Current tax expense:
               
Federal
  $ 989,854     $ 750,857  
State
    60,535       109,773  
 
           
Total current tax expense
    1,050,389       860,630  
 
           
Deferred tax expense:
               
Federal
    (275,561 )     (265,626 )
State
    (55,933 )     (55,012 )
 
           
Total deferred tax expense
    (331,494 )     (320,638 )
 
           
Total income tax expense
  $ 718,895     $ 539,992  
 
           

     Pinnacle Financial’s income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the Federal income tax statutory rates of 34% in 2005 and 2004 to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is as follows:

                 
    2005     2004  
Income taxes at statutory rate
  $ 849,540     $ 547,744  
State tax expense, net of federal tax effect
    107,192       69,112  
Federal tax credits
    (75,000 )      
Tax-exempt municipal securities
    (53,349 )     (18,284 )
Other items
    (109,488 )     (58,580 )
 
           
Income tax expense
  $ 718,895     $ 539,992  
 
           

     The effective tax rate for Pinnacle Financial is impacted by Federal tax credits related to the New Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately $2.3 million in future Federal tax credits to be realized over the next seven years. Tax benefits related to these credits will be recognized for financial reporting purposes in the same periods that the credits are recognized in the Company’s income tax returns. The credit that is available for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 is $300,000 in each year. Pinnacle Financial believes that it and its subsidiary will continue to comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New Markets Tax Credit program such that it will be able to claim the credit in its Federal income tax return in 2005 and 2004. Also, during 2004, Pinnacle National formed a real estate investment trust which provides Pinnacle Financial with an alternative vehicle for raising capital. Additionally, the ownership structure of this real estate investment trust provides certain income tax benefits to Pinnacle National and Pinnacle Financial.

     In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that Pinnacle Financial will realize the benefit of these deductible differences.

Page 13


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

     The components of deferred income taxes included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 are as follows:

                 
    2005     2004  
Deferred tax assets:
               
Loan loss allowance
  $ 2,374,212     $ 2,162,332  
Securities
    1,225,620        
Other assets
    151,599       136,790  
 
           
 
    3,751,431       2,299,122  
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
          62,390  
Other accruals
    132,968       175,384  
Securities
          15,240  
 
           
 
    132,968       253,014  
 
           
Net deferred tax assets
  $ 3,618,463     $ 2,046,108  
 
           

Note 5. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

     In the normal course of business, Pinnacle Financial has entered into off-balance sheet financial instruments which include commitments to extend credit (i.e., including unfunded lines of credit) and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are usually the result of lines of credit granted to existing borrowers under agreements that the total outstanding indebtedness will not exceed a specific amount during the term of the indebtedness. Typical borrowers are commercial concerns that use lines of credit to supplement their treasury management functions, thus their total outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate during any time period based on the seasonality of their business and the resultant timing of their cash flows. Other typical lines of credit are related to home equity loans granted to consumers. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.

     Standby letters of credit are generally issued on behalf of an applicant (our customer) to a specifically named beneficiary and are the result of a particular business arrangement that exists between the applicant and the beneficiary. Standby letters of credit have fixed expiration dates and are usually for terms of two years or less unless terminated beforehand due to criteria specified in the standby letter of credit. A typical arrangement involves the applicant routinely being indebted to the beneficiary for such items as inventory purchases, insurance, utilities, lease guarantees or other third party commercial transactions. The standby letter of credit would permit the beneficiary to obtain payment from Pinnacle Financial under certain prescribed circumstances. Subsequently, Pinnacle Financial would then seek reimbursement from the applicant pursuant to the terms of the standby letter of credit.

     Pinnacle Financial follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices when making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis and the amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, real estate and improvements, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and personal property.

     The contractual amounts of these commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and would only be reflected if drawn upon. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default on their resulting obligation to us, Pinnacle Financial’s maximum exposure to credit loss, without consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.

     A summary of Pinnacle Financial’s total contractual amount for all off-balance sheet commitments at March 31, 2005 is as follows:

         
Commitments to extend credit
  $ 209,544,000  
Standby letters of credit
    51,430,000  

Page 14


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

     At March 31, 2005, the fair value of Pinnacle Financial’s standby letters of credit was $240,000. This amount represents the unamortized fee associated with these standby letters of credit and is included in the consolidated balance sheet of Pinnacle Financial. This fair value will decrease over time as the existing standby letters of credit approach their expiration dates.

     Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, claims outstanding at December 31, 2004 have no material effect on Pinnacle Financial’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 6. Stock Option Plans and Restricted Shares

     Pinnacle Financial has two stock option plans under which it has granted options to its employees to purchase common stock at or above the fair market value on the date of grant. All of the options are intended to be incentive stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code for favorable tax treatment. To date, options under the plans vest in 20% increments each year over a five year period beginning one year after the date of the grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant.

     A summary of the plan changes during the three months ended March 31, 2005 is as follows:

                 
            Weighted-  
            Average  
            Exercise  
    Number     Price  
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
    1,068,350     $ 7.03  
Granted
    145,182       23.85  
Exercised
    (2,139 )     5.23  
Forfeited
           
 
           
Outstanding at March 31, 2005
    1,211,393     $ 9.04  
 
           

     The following table summarizes information about Pinnacle Financial’s stock option plan at March 31, 2005:

                                 
    Number of     Remaining     Weighted-        
    Remaining     Weighted-Average     Average     Number of  
Grant date   Shares     Contractual     Exercise     Shares  
by year   Outstanding     Life in Years     Price     Exercisable  
2000
    358,840       5.7     $ 5.00       287,072  
2001
    94,220       5.9       3.82       74,956  
2002
    244,345       6.9       5.01       144,687  
2003
    181,100       8.1       7.55       53,300  
2004
    187,706       9.0       14.65       20,723  
2005
    145,182       9.8       23.85        
 
                       
 
    1,211,393       7.3     $ 9.04       580,738  
 
                       

     Additionally, Pinnacle Financial’s 2004 equity incentive plan provides for the granting of restricted share awards and other performance-based awards, such as stock appreciation rights. During 2004, Pinnacle Financial awarded 3,846 shares of restricted common stock to certain executives of Pinnacle Financial. The forfeiture restrictions on the restricted shares lapse in three separate tranches should Pinnacle Financial achieve certain earnings and soundness targets for the 2004, 2005 and 2006 fiscal years or earnings and soundness targets for the three year period ended December 31, 2006. Compensation expense associated with the restricted share awards is recognized over the time period that the restrictions associated with the awards lapse. As a result, at each financial reporting date, the restricted shares are marked to fair value and compensation expense is measured based on the anticipated number of shares that will ultimately vest and the timing of the vesting period. Earnings and soundness targets for the 2004 fiscal year were achieved and the restrictions related to 1,282 shares were released. For the three month period ended March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial recognized approximately $8,000 in compensation costs attributable to these awards.

Page 15


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 7. Regulatory Matters

     Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial under federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Pinnacle Financial is also subject to limits on payment of dividends to its shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of federal banking authorities. Pinnacle Financial has not paid any dividends to date, nor does it anticipate paying dividends to its shareholders for the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy will depend on Pinnacle National’s earnings, capital position, financial condition and other factors.

     Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Pinnacle Financial’s and Pinnacle National’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

     Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes, as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle National must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):

                                                 
                                    Minimum  
                                    To Be Well-Capitalized  
                    Minimum     Under Prompt  
                    Capital     Corrective  
    Actual     Requirement     Action Provisions  
    Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio  
At March 31, 2005
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 76,165       11.5 %   $ 53,031       8.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 68,225       10.3 %   $ 52,919       8.0 %   $ 66,148       10.0 %
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 69,967       10.6 %   $ 26,516       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 62,027       9.4 %   $ 26,459       4.0 %   $ 39,689       6.0 %
Tier I capital to average assets (*):
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 69,967       9.2 %   $ 30,275       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 62,027       8.2 %   $ 30,165       4.0 %   $ 37,706       5.0 %
At December 31, 2004
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 73,540       12.7 %   $ 46,410       8.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 63,775       11.0 %   $ 46,373       8.0 %   $ 57,967       10.0 %
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 67,880       11.7 %   $ 23,205       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 58,115       10.0 %   $ 23,187       4.0 %   $ 34,780       6.0 %
Tier I capital to average assets (*):
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 67,880       9.7 %   $ 28,134       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 58,115       8.3 %   $ 28,116       4.0 %   $ 35,145       5.0 %


(*)   Average assets for the above calculations were averages for the most recent quarter.

Page 16


Table of Contents

PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 8. Investments in Affiliated Companies

     Investments in affiliated companies accounted for under the equity method consist of 100% of the common stock of PNFP Statutory Trust I (“Trust”), a wholly-owned statutory business trust. The Trust was formed on December 30, 2003. Summary financial information for the Trust follows (dollars in thousands):

Summary Balance Sheet

                 
    At March 31,     At Dec. 31,  
    2005     2004  
Asset – Investment in subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial
  $ 10,310     $ 10,310  
 
           
Liabilities
  $     $  
Stockholder’s equity – Trust preferred securities
    10,000       10,000  
Common stock (100% owned by Pinnacle Financial)
    310       310  
 
           
Total stockholder’s equity
    10,310       10,310  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity
  $ 10,310     $ 10,310  
 
           

Summary Income Statement

                 
    Three months ended  
    March 31,  
    2005     2004  
Income – Interest income from subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial
  $ 135       102  
 
           
Net Income
  $ 135       102  
 
           

Summary Statement of Stockholder’s Equity

                                 
    Trust                     Total  
    Preferred     Common     Retained     Stockholder’s  
    Securities     Stock     Earnings     Equity  
Beginning balances, December 31, 2004
  $ 10,000     $ 310     $     $ 10,310  
Retained earnings:
                               
Net income
                135       135  
Dividends:
                               
Trust preferred securities
                (131 )     (131 )
Common paid to Pinnacle Financial
                (4 )     (4 )
 
                       
Total retained earnings
                       
 
                       
Ending balances, March 31, 2005
  $ 10,000     $ 310     $     $ 10,310  
 
                       

Note 9. Subsequent Events

     On April 19, 2005, the shareholders of Pinnacle Financial approved an increase in the number of authorized shares of capital stock from 30,000,000 shares to 50,000,000 shares. With the increase, the number of authorized shares of common stock was increased from 20,000,000 shares to 40,000,000 shares and the number of authorized shares of preferred stock remained at 10,000,000 shares.

     On April 19, 2005, the shareholders also approved an amendment to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan which would set aside for issuance an additional 250,000 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock.

Page 17


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is a discussion of our financial condition at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements. You should read the following discussion and analysis along with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein.

Overview

General. Pinnacle Financial’s rapid growth from its inception through the first quarter of 2005 continues to have a material impact on Pinnacle Financial’s financial condition and results of operations. This rapid growth resulted in net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 of $0.19 per diluted share as compared to $0.13 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2004. At March 31, 2005, loans totaled $517 million, as compared to $472 million at December 31, 2004, while total deposits were $619 million at March 31, 2005 compared to $571 million at December 31, 2004.

Results of Operations. Pinnacle Financial’s net interest income increased to $6.5 million in the first quarter of 2005 from $4.2 million in 2004. The net interest margin (the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets for the period) was 3.78% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to 3.49% for the same period in 2004.

The increase in loan volumes for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was the primary cause for the $247,000 increase in Pinnacle Financial’s provision for loan losses when compared to the same period in 2004. As Pinnacle Financial’s loan portfolio continues to grow, Pinnacle Financial expects that the growth will be considered in establishing the allowance for loan losses.

Noninterest income for the first three months of 2005 compared to the same time period in 2004 increased by $47,000, or 4.2%. The increase between 2005 and 2004 was due to Pinnacle Financial’s increased revenues from its mortgage origination unit, increases in investment services revenues between the periods, and increases in deposit service charges partially offset by decreases in gains on the sales of loans and securities available-for-sale.

Pinnacle Financial’s growth for the first three months of 2005 when compared to the same time period in 2004 resulted in an increase of approximately $1.3 million in noninterest expense related to salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses and other operating expenses. As Pinnacle Financial increased its number of full-time equivalent employees from 95.0 at March 31, 2004 to 131.5 at March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial experienced an approximately $797,000 increase in compensation and employee benefit expense. Pinnacle Financial expects to add additional employees throughout 2005 which will cause Pinnacle Financial’s compensation and employee benefit expense to increase in future periods. Pinnacle Financial’s branch expansion efforts in 2004 and 2005 also resulted in increased noninterest expense for the first three months of 2005. The increased operational expenses for the branches opened in 2004 and the expected opening of two additional branches in 2005 will continue to result in increased noninterest expense in future periods. Although Pinnacle Financial’s expenses increased in 2005 when compared to 2004, Pinnacle Financial’s efficiency ratio, the ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, decreased from 62.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to 59.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2005.

We continue to believe that a rising short-term interest rate environment is more likely than a falling rate environment over the next few quarters. We believe this should result in increased net interest income for us, in contrast to a falling or stagnant rate environment, primarily due to approximately 55.5% of our loan volumes are floating rate loans that reprice with adjustments to our prime lending rate or other similarly published overnite interest rate indices. We believe we will continue to grow our balance sheet with continued emphasis on floating rate lending. However, due to increased competition for deposits in Nashville, we do not believe we will experience any additional margin expansion for the remainder of 2005 with some likelihood that modest contraction could occur to meet the competitive pressures to maintain and acquire additional deposit volumes.

Page 18


Table of Contents

Conversely, a falling rate environment could serve to have the opposite effect on our net interest income. In a falling rate environment, we may not be able to reduce our deposit funding costs by any meaningful amount due to market pressures, while our interest income could decrease at a more rapid pace.

Financial Condition. The $44 million increase in loans during the first three months of 2005 contributed to the increase in Pinnacle Financial’s net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 when compared to an increase of $26 million for the similar period in 2004. As Pinnacle Financial seeks to increase its loan portfolio it must also continue to monitor the risks inherent in its lending operations. If Pinnacle Financial’s allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover loan losses in Pinnacle Financial’s loan portfolio, increases to the allowance for loan losses would be required which would decrease Pinnacle Financial’s earnings.

Pinnacle Financial has successfully grown its total deposits to $619 million at March 31, 2005 compared to $571 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of 8.4%.

We continue to believe there is broad acceptance of our business model within the Nashville area and in our target markets of small businesses and affluent clients. As a result, and due to our sales pipelines remaining strong at the current time, we believe we will continue to increase our loan and deposit balances for the remainder of 2005 at volumes comparable to prior periods.

Capital and Liquidity. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Financial’s capital ratios, including Pinnacle National’s capital ratios, met regulatory minimum capital requirements and all requirements Pinnacle Financial has committed to regulators to maintain. Additionally, at March 31, 2005, Pinnacle National would be considered to be “well-capitalized” pursuant to banking regulations.

Over the past few years, we have been successful in procuring additional capital from the capital markets (via public and private offerings). The additional capital was required to support our growth. We currently believe, with anticipated earnings in future periods and future balance sheet projections, we will be able to maintain acceptable capital levels without having to obtain additional common equity. However, our current planning assumption is that should we determine that Pinnacle Financial require supplemental capital to support continued rapid growth, we would, in all likelihood, seek approval from regulatory authorities to issue additional trust preferred securities. However, circumstances unknown to us at this time, including expansion to other geographic markets, could require us to seek additional capital through the issuance of Pinnacle Financial common stock.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with United States generally accepted accounting principles and with general practices within the banking industry. In connection with the application of those principles, we have made judgments and estimates which, in the case of the determination of our allowance for loan losses (ALL), have been critical to the determination of our financial position and results of operations.

Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL). Our management assesses the adequacy of the ALL prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The ALL consists of two portions (1) an allocated amount representative of specifically identified credit exposure and exposures readily predictable by historical or comparative experience; and (2) an unallocated amount representative of inherent loss which is not readily identifiable. Even though the ALL is composed of two components, the entire ALL is available to absorb any credit losses.

We establish the allocated amount separately for two different risk groups (1) unique loans (commercial loans, including those loans considered impaired); and (2) homogeneous loans (generally consumer loans). We base the allocation for unique loans primarily on risk rating grades assigned to each of these loans as a result of our loan management and review processes. We then assign each risk-rating grade a loss ratio, which is determined based on the experience of management, discussions with banking regulators and our independent loan review process. We estimate losses on impaired loans based on estimated cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate or based on the underlying collateral value. Based on management’s experience, we also assign loss ratios to

Page 19


Table of Contents

our consumer portfolio. These loss ratios are assigned to the various homogenous categories of the consumer portfolio (e.g., automobile, residential mortgage, home equity).

The unallocated amount is particularly subjective and does not lend itself to exact mathematical calculation. The unallocated amount represents estimated inherent credit losses which may exist, but have not yet been identified, as of the balance sheet date. In estimating the unallocated amount, we consider such matters as changes in the local or national economy, the depth or experience in the lending staff, any concentrations of credit in any particular industry group, and new banking laws or regulations. After we assess applicable factors, we evaluate the aggregate unallocated amount based on our management’s experience.

We then test the resulting ALL balance by comparing the balance in the ALL to historical trends and peer information. Our management then evaluates the result of the procedures performed, including the result of our testing, and concludes on the appropriateness of the balance of the ALL in its entirety. The audit committee of our board of directors reviews the assessment prior to the filing of quarterly and annual financial information.

In assessing the adequacy of the ALL, we also rely on an ongoing independent loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there are loans in the portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall evaluation of the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process includes the judgment of management, the input from our independent loan reviewer, who is not an employee of Pinnacle National, and reviews that may have been conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process.

Results of Operations

Our results were highlighted by the continued growth in loans and other earning assets and deposits, which resulted in increased revenues and expenses. Our net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $1,780,000 and $1,071,000, respectively, as follows:

                         
    Three Months        
    Ended March 31,     Percent  
    2005     2004     Increase  
Interest income
  $ 9,270     $ 5,666       63.6 %
Interest expense
    2,767       1,514       82.7  
 
                 
Net interest income
    6,503       4,152       56.6  
Provision for loan losses
    601       354       69.8  
 
                 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    5,902       3,798       55.4  
Noninterest income
    1,178       1,131       4.2  
Noninterest expense
    4,581       3,318       38.1  
 
                 
Net income before taxes
    2,499       1,611       55.1  
Income tax expense
    719       540       33.1  
 
                 
Net income
  $ 1,780     $ 1,071       66.2 %
 
                 

     Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the amount by which interest earned on various earning assets exceeds interest paid on deposits and other interest bearing liabilities and is the most significant component of our earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, we recorded net interest income of $6,503,000, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.78% for the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, we recorded net interest income of $4,152,000, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.49% for the period.

     The following tables set forth the amount of our average balances, interest income or interest expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net yield on average interest-earning assets for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

Page 20


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Three months ended     Three months ended  
    March 31, 2005     March 31, 2004  
    Average             Yield/     Average             Yield/  
    Balances     Interest     Rate(1)     Balances     Interest     Rate(1)  
Interest-earning assets:
                                               
Loans
  $ 488,313     $ 6,954       5.78 %   $ 306,549     $ 3,947       5.14 %
Securities:
                                               
Taxable
    184,926       2,022       4.43       140,007       1,551       4.44  
Tax-exempt
    23,327       201       4.50       9,795       86       4.52  
Federal funds sold
    8,848       46       2.10       22,024       49       0.91  
Other
    3,276       47       6.50       2,401       33       6.15  
 
                                   
Total interest-earning assets
    708,690       9,270       5.34       480,776       5,666       4.73  
 
                                       
Non-earning assets
    48,194                       27,664                  
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 756,884                     $ 508,440                  
 
                                           
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                                               
Interest-bearing deposits:
                                               
Interest checking
  $ 57,738       72       0.51 %   $ 32,859       42       0.51 %
Savings and money market
    222,079       698       1.27       146,731       286       0.78  
Certificates of deposit
    216,612       1,383       2.59       161,559       843       2.09  
 
                                   
Total interest-bearing deposits
    496,429       2,153       1.76       341,149       1,171       1.38  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    38,149       150       1.60       14,868       9       0.25  
Federal funds purchased
    614       5       2.76                    
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    50,233       323       2.61       42,379       231       2.19  
Subordinated debt
    10,310       136       5.32       10,310       103       3.98  
 
                                   
Total interest-bearing liabilities
    595,735       2,767       1.88       408,706       1,514       1.49  
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
    100,929                   61,454              
 
                                   
Total deposits and interest-bearing liabilities
    696,664       2,767       1.61       470,160       1,514       1.29  
 
                                       
Other liabilities
    1,800                       2,575                  
Stockholders’ equity
    58,420                       35,705                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 756,884                     $ 508,440                  
 
                                           
Net interest income
          $ 6,503                     $ 4,152          
 
                                           
Net interest spread (2)
                    3.46 %                     3.25 %
Net interest margin (3)
                    3.78 %                     3.49 %


(1)   Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis.
 
(2)   Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
 
(3)   Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets for the period.

As noted above, the net interest margin for the first quarter of 2005 was 3.78% compared to a net interest margin of 3.49% for the same period in 2004, an increase of 0.29%. Other matters related to the changes in net interest income, net interest yields and rates, and net interest margin are presented below:

  •   Our loan yields increased from 5.14% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to 5.78% for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Approximately 55.5% of our loans are floating rate loans at March 31, 2005 compared to 56.0% at December 31, 2004 and 52.4% at March 31, 2004. The interest rates charged these borrowers are tied, in substantially all cases, to our prime rate which is usually less than fixed rate loan yields. Our weighted average prime rate for the first three months of 2005 was 5.43% compared to 4.25% for the same period in 2004. The rates for 2005 were higher due primarily to periodic increases in the overnight Federal funds rate as determined by the Open Market Committee of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. Pinnacle National uses the overnight Federal funds rate as the primary benchmark in setting its prime lending rate.
 
  •   We have been able to grow our funding base significantly. For asset/liability management purposes in 2005, we elected to allocate a greater proportion of such funds to our loan portfolio versus our securities and shorter term investment portfolio than in 2004. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, average

Page 21


Table of Contents

      loan balances were 68.9% of total interest earning assets compared to 63.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2004. Loans generally have higher yields than do securities and other shorter term investments. This change in allocation contributed to the overall total interest earning asset yields of 5.34% for the first three months of 2005 being 0.61% higher than the 4.73% for the first three months of 2004.

  •   During 2005, overall deposit rates were higher than those rates for the comparable period in 2004. Changes in interest rates paid on such products as interest checking, savings and money market accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal funds purchased will generally increase or decrease in a manner that is consistent with changes in the short-term rate environment. During 2005, and as was the case with our prime lending rate, short-term rates were higher than in 2004. We also monitor the pricing of similar products by our primary competitors. The changes in the short-term rate environment and the pricing of our primary competitors required us to increase these rates in 2005 compared to the same period in 2004.
 
  •   During the first three months of 2005, the average balances of noninterest bearing deposit balances, interest bearing transaction accounts, savings and money market accounts and securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to 60.1% of our total funding compared to 54.4% in 2004. These funding sources generally have lower rates than do other funding sources, such as certificates of deposit and other borrowings. As a result, the average rates on fundings for the first three months of 2005 were lower than they would have been otherwise due to this change in funding mix.
 
  •   Similarly, the short- and long-term rate environment impacts rates paid on certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB; however, these items are also impacted by our decisions to alter the mix of maturities of the underlying accounts within these items. Furthermore, the timing of the initial sale of the certificate of deposit or the funding of the FHLB advance also impacts the rates paid on these items. Our results were impacted by certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB that had been acquired during periods of lower interest rates. Such items matured during the interim period between the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and were replaced by certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB which had higher interest rates. These matters contributed to the increase in the rates paid on certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB between the two periods.
 
  •   Also impacting the net interest margin during the first three months of 2005 compared to 2004 was pricing of our subordinated indebtedness. The interest rate charged on this indebtedness is generally higher than other funding sources. The rate charged on this indebtedness is determined in relation to the three-month LIBOR index and reprices quarterly. During 2005, the short-term interest rate environment was higher than during the three months ended March 31, 2004, and, as a result, the pricing for this funding source was higher in 2005 than in 2004.

Rate and Volume Analysis. As noted above, net interest income increased by $2,351,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004. The following is an analysis of the changes in our net interest income comparing the changes attributable to rates and those attributable to volumes (dollars in thousands):

Page 22


Table of Contents

                         
    Increase (decrease) due to     Total increase  
Dollar change in interest income and expense   Volume     Rate     (decrease)  
Interest-earning assets:
                       
Loans
  $ 2,489     $ 518     $ 3,007  
Securities:
                       
Taxable
    523       (52 )     471  
Tax-exempt
    124       (9 )     115  
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
    (165 )     162       (3 )
Other
    12       2       14  
 
                 
 
    2,983       621       3,604  
 
                 
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                       
Interest checking
  $ 34     $ (4 )   $ 30  
Savings and money market accounts
    186       226       412  
Certificates of deposit
    320       220       540  
 
                 
Total interest-bearing deposits
    540       442       982  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    32       109       141  
Federal funds purchased
    4       1       5  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    46       46       92  
Subordinated debt
    25       8       33  
 
                 
 
    647       606       1,253  
 
                 
Increase in net interest income
  $ 2,336     $ 15     $ 2,351  
 
                 


(1)   The above amounts are presented on a fully tax equivalent basis.
 
(2)   Changes in net interest income are attributed to either changes in average balances (volume change) or changes in average rates (rate change) for earning assets and sources of funds on which interest is received or paid. Volume change is calculated as change in volume times the previous rate while rate change is calculated as a change in rate times the previous volume. The change attributed to rates and volumes (change in rate times change in volume) is allocated between volume change and rate change at the ratio of how much each component bears to the absolute value of their total.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents a charge to earnings necessary to establish an allowance for loan losses that, in our management’s evaluation, should be adequate to provide coverage for the inherent losses on outstanding loans. The provision for loan losses amounted to $601,000 and $354,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Based upon our management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio, we believe the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to absorb our estimate of probable losses existing in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The increase in the provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 when compared to the same period in 2004 was primarily due to the increase in loan volumes for the three months ended March 31, 2005 when compared to 2004 and a $23,000 increase in net charge-offs in 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Based upon management’s assessment of the loan portfolio, we adjust our allowance for loan losses to an amount deemed appropriate to adequately cover inherent risks in the loan portfolio. While our policies and procedures used to estimate the allowance for loan losses, as well as the resultant provision for loan losses charged to operations, are considered adequate by our management and are reviewed from time to time by Pinnacle National’s regulators, they are necessarily approximate and imprecise. There exist factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions both locally and nationally, which may negatively impact, materially, the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses and, thus, the resulting provision for loan losses.

Noninterest Income. Our noninterest income is composed of several components, some of which vary significantly between quarterly periods. Service charges on deposit accounts and other noninterest income generally reflect our growth, while investment services and fees from the origination of mortgage loans will often reflect market conditions and fluctuate from period to period. The opportunities for recognition of gains on loans and loan participations sold and gain on sales of investment securities may also vary widely from quarter to quarter and year to year.

Page 23


Table of Contents

The following is the makeup of our noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

                         
                    % increase  
    2005     2004     (decrease)  
Noninterest income:
                       
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 262     $ 164       59.8 %
Investment services
    437       390       12.1  
Gains on sales of loans and loan participations, net:
                       
Fees from the origination and sale of mortgage loans, net of sales commissions
    176       100       76.0  
Other
    (15 )     120       (120.5 )
Gains on sales of investment securities, net
    114       248       (54.0 )
Other noninterest income
    204       109       87.2  
 
                 
Total noninterest income
  $ 1,178     $ 1,131       4.2 %
 
                 

As shown, the largest component of noninterest income is commissions and fees from our financial advisory unit, Pinnacle Asset Management, a division of Pinnacle National. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle Asset Management was receiving commissions and fees in connection with approximately $400 million in brokerage assets held with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. compared to $351 million at March 31, 2004.

Service charge income for the first three months of 2005 increased over that of the first three months of 2004 due to an increase in the number of deposit accounts subject to service charges. Additionally, mortgage related fees also provided for a significant portion of the increase in noninterest income between 2005 and 2004 due to increased volumes of originations and increased number of mortgage originators. These mortgage fees are for loans originated by Pinnacle National and subsequently sold to third-party investors. All loans are sold whereby servicing rights transfer to the buyer. Generally, mortgage origination fees increase in lower interest rate environments and decrease in rising interest rate environments. As a result, mortgage origination fees may fluctuate greatly in response to a changing rate environment. Direct sales commissions paid to mortgage originators have been reclassified and offset against the fees from the origination of mortgage loans.

Another noninterest income item for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was related to our sale of certain loan participations to our correspondent banks that were primarily related to new lending transactions in excess of internal loan limits. At March 31, 2005 and pursuant to participation agreements with these correspondents, we had participated approximately $59 million of originated loans to these other banks compared to $55 million at March 31, 2004. These participation agreements have various provisions regarding collateral position, pricing and other matters. Many of these agreements provide that we pay the correspondent less than the loan’s contracted interest rate. Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities — a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125”, we recorded a loss of $15,000 during the first quarter of 2005. This loss represents the unamortized asset associated with certain loans previously sold to correspondents which were prepaid by the borrower. As the loans were prepaid by the borrower, the unamortized asset associated with these loans has been reflected as a loss on sales of loans and loan participations sold in the accompanying statement of income. These loss amounts exceeded the net present value of future net revenues associated with new loans sold to correspondents. As a result a net loss has been reflected in the above amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2005. The $15,000 loss for the three months ended March 31, 2005 compares to $122,000 in net gains during the three months ended March 31, 2004. At March 31, 2005, the remaining unamortized asset associated with the cumulative gains approximated $433,000. We intend to maintain relationships with our correspondents in order to sell participations in future loans to these correspondents in a similar manner. However, the timing of participations may cause the level of gains, if any, to vary significantly.

Also included in noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2005, were net gains of approximately $114,000 realized from the sale of approximately $6.8 million of available-for-sale securities. This compares to $248,000 in gains on the sale of approximately $21.9 million of investment securities for the same period in the prior year.

Page 24


Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses, and other operating expenses. The following is the makeup of our noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 (dollars in thousands):

                         
                    % Increase  
    2005     2004     (decrease)  
Noninterest expense:
                       
Compensation and employee benefits:
                       
Salaries
  $ 1,847     $ 1,393       32.6 %
Commissions
    170       135       25.9  
Other, primarily incentives
    556       354       57.1  
Employee benefits
    398       291       36.8  
 
                 
Total compensation and employee benefits
    2,971       2,173       36.7  
Equipment and occupancy
    784       506       54.9  
Marketing and other business development
    113       149       (24.6 )
Postage and supplies
    136       99       40.4  
Other noninterest expense:
                       
Accounting and auditing
    90       44       104.5  
Consultants, including loan review
    31       36       (13.9 )
Legal, including borrower related charges
    26       37       (29.7 )
OCC exam fees
    42       30       40.0  
Directors’ fees
    65       31       109.7  
Insurance, including FDIC
    80       45       77.8  
Other
    243       168       44.6  
 
                 
Total other noninterest expense
    577       391       47.6  
 
                 
Total noninterest expense
  $ 4,581     $ 3,318       38.1 %
 
                 

Expenses have generally increased between the above periods due to personnel additions occurring throughout each period, the continued development of our branch network and other expenses which increase in relation to our growth rate. We anticipate continued increases in our expenses during 2005 when compared to 2004 for such items as additional personnel, the opening of additional branches, legal and audit expenses and other expenses which tend to increase in relation to our growth.

At March 31, 2005, we employed 131.5 full time equivalent employees compared to 95.0 at March 31, 2004. We intend to continue to add employees to our work force during 2005, which will cause our salary costs to increase in future periods.

We believe that variable pay incentives are a valuable tool in motivating an employee base that is focused on providing our clients effective financial advice and increasing shareholder value. As a result, and unlike many other financial institutions, substantially all of our employees are eligible to participate in an annual cash incentive plan. Included in the salary and employee benefits amounts for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, are $507,000 and $290,000 in costs related to these variable pay awards. The awards will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on the estimation of achievement of performance targets and the increase in the number of associates eligible to receive the award. For 2004, the actual award paid equaled approximately 80% of the targeted award. The incentive plan for 2005 is structured similarly to prior year plans. Because of the relative experience of our associates, our compensation costs are and we expect will continue to be higher on a per associate basis than other financial institutions; however, we believe the experience and engagement of our associates also allows us to employ fewer people than most financial institutions our size.

Also, during 2004 we opened a new branch office in the West End area of Nashville and in January of 2005 opened an office in Franklin, Tennessee. Our occupancy and equipment expenses in 2005 increased over that of 2004 due to the branches only being open for part of in 2004.

Marketing and other business development expenses are lower in 2005 compared to 2004 due to decreased customer entertainment and community relations expenses. Other noninterest expenses are significantly higher

Page 25


Table of Contents

in 2005 over the same periods in 2004. For the three month period ended March 31, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, other noninterest expenses were $185,000 higher. Most of these increases are attributable to increased audit and accounting fees, and insurance expenses. Of particular note is that audit and accounting fees are higher in 2005 due to increased expenses associated with Sarbanes Oxley Section 404 compliance and other matters.

Our efficiency ratio (ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income) was 59.6% in the first quarter of 2005 compared to 62.8% in the first quarter of 2004. The efficiency ratio measures the amount of expense that is incurred to generate a dollar of revenue. Our efficiency ratio will fluctuate due to many factors. Concerning expenses, each period’s efficiency ratio will be impacted by the number of new associates added and any new offices.

Income Taxes. The effective income tax expense rate for the first three months of 2005 was approximately 28.8% compared to an effective income tax expense rate for 2004 of approximately 33.5%. The reduction in the effective tax rate between 2005 and 2004 was 4.7% and was primarily due to Federal tax credits related to the New Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately $2.3 million in future Federal tax credits to be realized over the next six years. The credit that is available for the year ended December 31, 2005 is $300,000 of which $75,000 has been recognized in the first quarter of 2005 and none was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2004. Pinnacle Financial believes that it and its subsidiary will be able to comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New Markets Tax Credit program during 2005 and future periods such that it will be able to continue to claim the credit in its 2005 Federal income tax return. Also, during the fourth quarter of 2004, we formed a real estate investment trust which provides us with an alternative vehicle for raising capital should we so desire. Additionally, the ownership structure of this real estate investment trust provides certain income tax benefits to us.

Page 26


Table of Contents

Quarterly Information. The following is a summary of quarterly balance sheet and results of operations information for the last six quarters (dollars in thousands, except per share data).

                                                 
    March     December     September     June     March     December  
    2005     2004     2004     2004     2004     2003  
Balance sheet data, at quarter end:
                                               
Total assets
  $ 787,436       727,139       685,408       586,313       541,052       498,421  
Total loans
    516,733       472,362       434,909       355,267       323,416       297,004  
Allowance for loan losses
    (6,198 )     (5,650 )     (5,434 )     (4,466 )     (4,042 )     (3,719 )
Securities
    202,223       208,170       191,323       165,528       162,315       139,944  
Total deposits
    619,021       570,727       541,859       467,321       437,601       390,569  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    46,388       31,928       22,958       23,772       14,699       15,050  
Advances from FHLB
    51,500       53,500       51,500       47,500       40,500       44,500  
Subordinated debt
    10,310       10,310       10,310       10,310       10,310       10,310  
Total stockholders’ equity
    57,657       57,880       56,668       35,125       36,266       34,336  
Balance sheet data, quarterly averages:
                                               
Total assets
  $ 756,884       707,131       618,694       555,437       508,440       454,700  
Total loans
    488,313       448,611       392,220       343,974       306,549       283,387  
Securities
    208,253       203,728       183,721       169,192       149,802       137,243  
Total earning assets
    708,690       670,839       589,554       527,070       480,776       432,691  
Total deposits
    597,358       562,936       485,300       439,964       402,603       356,030  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    38,149       23,520       25,953       17,523       14,868       16,013  
Advances from FHLB
    50,233       48,022       49,000       45,736       42,379       43,630  
Subordinated debt
    10,310       10,310       10,310       10,310       10,310       655  
Total stockholders’ equity
    58,420       57,721       43,868       35,542       35,705       33,935  
Statement of operations data, for the three months ended:
                                               
Interest income
  $ 9,270       8,574       7,214       6,225       5,666       5,244  
Interest expense
    2,767       2,296       1,915       1,689       1,514       1,351  
 
                                   
Net interest income
    6,503       6,278       5,299       4,536       4,152       3,893  
Provision for loan losses
    601       1,134       1,012       449       354       204  
 
                                   
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    5,902       5,144       4,287       4,087       3,798       3,689  
Noninterest income
    1,178       1,246       1,534       1,067       1,131       852  
Noninterest expense
    4,581       4,127       3,860       3,499       3,318       3,196  
 
                                   
Income before taxes
    2,499       2,263       1,961       1,655       1,611       1,345  
Income tax expense
    719       574       570       487       540       487  
 
                                   
Net income
  $ 1,780       1,689       1,391       1,168       1,071       858  
 
                                   
Per share data:
                                               
Earnings – basic
  $ 0.21       0.20       0.18       0.16       0.15       0.12  
Earnings – diluted
  $ 0.19       0.18       0.16       0.14       0.13       0.11  
Book value at quarter end(1)
  $ 6.87       6.90       6.75       4.74       4.91       4.65  
Weighted avg. shares – basic
    8,389,256       8,389,232       7,832,512       7,397,920       7,384,106       7,384,106  
Weighted avg. shares – diluted
    9,437,183       9,448,696       8,857,015       8,279,114       8,213,730       8,114,888  
Common shares outstanding
    8,391,371       8,389,232       8,389,232       7,404,586       7,384,106       7,384,106  


(1)   Book value per share computed by dividing total stockholders’ equity by common shares outstanding

Page 27


Table of Contents

Financial Condition

Our consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2005 reflects significant growth since December 31, 2004. Total assets grew to $787 million as of March 31, 2005 up 33% on an annualized basis from the $727 million reported at December 31, 2004. Loans as of March 31, 2005 were $517 million compared to $472 million at December 31, 2004. Total deposits increased to $619 million at March 31, 2005, compared to $571 million at December 31, 2004.

Net loan growth for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 was $44.4 million compared to $26.4 million during the first quarter of 2004. Total deposit growth for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, was $48.3 million compared to $47.0 million during the first quarter of 2004.

Loans. The composition of loans at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and the percentage (%) of each classification to total loans are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):

                                 
    2005     2004  
    Amount     %     Amount     %  
Commercial real estate – Mortgage
  $ 122,639       23.7 %   $ 117,123       24.8 %
Commercial real estate – Construction
    24,456       4.8       8,428       1.8  
Commercial – Other
    200,054       38.7       189,456       40.1  
 
                       
Total commercial
    347,149       67.2       315,007       66.7  
 
                       
Consumer real estate – Mortgage
    145,676       28.2       126,907       26.9  
Consumer real estate – Construction
    8,380       1.6       14,991       3.2  
Consumer – Other
    15,528       3.0       15,457       3.3  
 
                       
Total consumer
    169,584       32.8       157,355       33.3  
 
                       
Total loans
  $ 516,733       100.0 %   $ 472,362       100.0 %
 
                       

The following table classifies our fixed and variable rate loans at March 31, 2005 according to contractual maturities of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, and (3) after five years along with percentage comparisons to December 31, 2004. The table also classifies our variable rate loans pursuant to the contractual repricing dates of the underlying loans (dollars in thousands):

                                         
    Amounts at March 31, 2005     Percentages to total loans  
    Fixed     Variable             at Mar. 31,     at Dec. 31,  
    Rates     Rates     Total     2005     2004  
Based on contractual maturities:
                                       
Due within one year
  $ 9,432     $ 160,004     $ 169,436       32.8 %     31.4 %
Due in one year through five years
    106,381       93,665       200,046       38.7       40.8  
Due after five years
    32,358       114,893       147,251       28.5       27.8  
 
                             
 
  $ 148,171     $ 368,562     $ 516,733       100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                             
Based on contractual repricing dates:
                                       
Floating rate
  $     $ 286,580     $ 286,580       55.5 %     56.0 %
Reprice within one year
    9,432       37,229       46,661       9.0       9.1  
Reprice in one year through five years
    106,381       40,481       146,862       28.4       28.8  
Reprice after five years
    32,358       4,272       36,630       7.1       6.1  
 
                             
 
  $ 148,171     $ 368,562     $ 516,733       100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                             

The above information does not consider the impact of scheduled principal payments. Daily floating rate loans are tied to Pinnacle National’s prime lending rate or a national interest rate index with the underlying loan rates changing in relation to changes in these indexes.

Non-Performing Assets. The specific economic and credit risks associated with our loan portfolio, include, but are not limited to, a general downturn in the economy which could affect employment rates in our market area, general real estate market deterioration, interest rate fluctuations, deteriorated or non-existent collateral, title defects, inaccurate appraisals, financial deterioration of borrowers, fraud, and any violation of banking laws and regulations.

We attempt to reduce these economic and credit risks by adherence to loan to value guidelines for collateralized loans, by investigating the creditworthiness of the borrower and by monitoring the borrower’s financial position. Also, we establish and periodically review our lending policies and procedures. Banking regulations limit our

Page 28


Table of Contents

exposure by prohibiting loan relationships that exceed 15% of Pinnacle National’s statutory capital in the case of loans that are not fully secured by readily marketable or other permissible types of collateral.

We discontinue the accrual of interest income when (1) there is a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or (2) the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. At March 31, 2005, we had two loans for $561,000 on nonaccruing status which were the same two loans at December 31, 2004. An estimate of the loss related to these nonaccrual loans has been incorporated into our ALL methodology.

There were approximately $47,000 in other loans at March 31, 2005 which were 90 days past due and still accruing interest. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, no loans were deemed to be a restructured loan. Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2005, we foreclosed on a single piece of property collateralizing one consumer loan. The foreclosed property was placed in Pinnacle National’s Other Real Estate Owned. We had no repossessed real estate properties classified as Other Real Estate Owned at December 31, 2004. The following table is a summary of our nonperforming assets at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):

                 
    2005     2004  
Nonaccrual loans(1)
  $ 561     $ 561  
Restructured loans
           
Other real estate owned
    35        
 
           
Total nonperforming assets
    596       561  
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
    47       146  
 
           
Total nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more
  $ 643     $ 707  
 
           
Total loans outstanding
  $ 516,733     $ 472,362  
 
           
Ratio of total nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more to total loans outstanding at end of period
    0.12 %     0.15 %
 
           
Ratio of total nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more to total allowance for loan losses at end of period
    10.4 %     12.5 %
 
           


(1)   Interest income that would have been recorded during the first three months of 2005 related to nonaccrual loans was $15,000 compared to $41,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004, none of which is included in interest income or net income for the applicable periods.

Potential problem assets, which are not included in nonperforming assets, amounted to $402,000 at March 31, 2005 or 0.08% of total loans compared to $24,000 or 0.01% at December 31, 2004. Potential problem assets represent those assets with a well-defined weakness and where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrower’s ability to comply with present repayment terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established by Pinnacle National’s primary regulator for loans classified as substandard.

Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL). We maintain the ALL at a level that our management deems appropriate to adequately cover the inherent risks in the loan portfolio. As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our allowance for loan losses was $6,198,000 and $5,650,000, respectively. Our management deemed these amounts to be adequate. The judgments and estimates associated with our ALL determination are described under “Critical Accounting Estimates” above.

Approximately 67.2% of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2005 and 66.7% at December 31, 2004 consisted of commercial loans. Using standard industry codes, we periodically analyze our loan position with respect to our borrowers’ industries to determine if a concentration of credit risk exists to any one or more industries. We do have a significant credit exposure of loans outstanding plus unfunded lines and letters of credit to borrowers in the trucking industry and to operators of nonresidential buildings at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Credit exposure to the trucking industry approximated $48.3 million at March 31, 2005 and $43.1 million at December 31, 2004. Credit exposure to operators of nonresidential buildings approximated $33.1 million at March 31, 2005 and $27.5 million at December 31, 2004. We evaluate our exposure level to these industry

Page 29


Table of Contents

groups periodically in order to determine if additional allowance allocations are warranted. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we determined that we did not have any excessive exposure to any single industry which would warrant additional allowance allocations.

The following table sets forth, based on management’s best estimate, the allocation of the ALL to types of loans as well as the unallocated portion as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and the percentage (%) of loans in each category to the total loans (dollars in thousands):

                                 
    2005     2004  
    Amount     %     Amount     %  
Commercial real estate – Mortgage
  $ 1,224       23.7 %   $ 1,205       24.8 %
Commercial real estate – Construction
    245       4.8       188       1.8  
Commercial – Other
    1,769       38.7       1,711       40.1  
 
                       
Total commercial
    3,238       67.2       3,104       66.7  
 
                       
Consumer real estate – Mortgage
    1,042       28.2       869       26.9  
Consumer real estate – Construction
    41       1.6       39       3.2  
Consumer – Other
    470       3.0       396       3.3  
 
                       
Total consumer
    1,553       32.8       1,304       33.3  
 
                       
Unallocated
    1,407     NA     1,242     NA
 
                       
Total loans
  $ 6,198       100.0 %   $ 5,650       100.0 %
 
                       

The following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and the year ended December 31, 2004 and the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans as of the end of each period (dollars in thousands):

                 
    2005     2004  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 5,650     $ 3,719  
Provision for loan losses
    601       2,948  
Charged-off loans:
               
Commercial real estate – Mortgage
           
Commercial real estate – Construction
           
Commercial – Other
           
Consumer real estate – Mortgage
    (38 )     (884 )
Consumer real estate – Construction
           
Consumer – Other
    (30 )     (148 )
 
           
Total charged-off loans
    (68 )     (1,032 )
 
           
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans:
               
Commercial real estate – Mortgage
           
Commercial real estate – Construction
          2  
Commercial – Other
    2        
Consumer real estate – Mortgage
           
Consumer real estate – Construction
           
Consumer – Other
    11       13  
 
           
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans
    13       15  
 
           
Balance at end of period
  $ 6,198     $ 5,650  
 
           
Ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at end of period
    1.20 %     1.20 %
 
           
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding for the period(1)
    0.04 %     0.27 %
 
           


(1)   The ratio of net charge-off’s to average loans outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was computed by annualizing the net charge-off amount to a twelve-month period.

Page 30


Table of Contents

During the first three months of 2005, we charged-off $68,000 related to several consumer loans. As a relatively new institution, we do not have loss experience comparable to more mature financial institutions; however, as our loan portfolio matures, we will have additional charge-offs, and we will consider the amount and nature of our charge-offs in determining the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses.

Investments. The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of our securities at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):

                                 
    March 31, 2005  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Securities available-for-sale:
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $     $     $     $  
U.S. government agency securities
    25,907       4       421       25,490  
Mortgage-backed securities
    134,839       56       2,851       132,044  
State and municipal securities
    15,086       18       211       14,893  
Corporate notes
    2,312             90       2,220  
 
                       
 
  $ 178,142     $ 78     $ 3,573     $ 174,647  
 
                       
Securities held-to-maturity:
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 17,746     $     $ 548     $ 17,198  
State and municipal securities
    9,831             305       9,526  
 
                       
 
  $ 27,577     $     $ 853     $ 26,724  
 
                       
                                 
    December 31, 2004  
            Gross     Gross        
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
Securities available-for-sale:
                               
U.S. Treasury securities
  $     $     $     $  
U.S. government agency securities
    27,165       129       (20 )     27,274  
Mortgage-backed securities
    138,851       348       (672 )     138,527  
State and municipal securities
    12,486       72       (55 )     12,503  
Corporate notes
    2,315             (45 )     2,270  
 
                       
 
  $ 180,817     $ 549     $ (792 )   $ 180,574  
 
                       
Securities held-to-maturity:
                               
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 17,746     $ 1     $ (299 )   $ 17,448  
State and municipal securities
    9,850             (163 )     9,687  
 
                       
 
  $ 27,596     $ 1     $ (462 )   $ 27,135  
 
                       

On March 31, 2004, Pinnacle National transferred $27.7 million of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity at fair value. The transfer consisted of substantially all of Pinnacle National’s holdings of Tennessee municipal securities and several of its longer-term agency securities. These securities were selected for the held-to-maturity classification because we have the ability and intent to hold such securities until their maturity. The unrealized gain on such securities as of the date of transfer was $325,000. This amount is reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, and will be amortized over the remaining lives of the respective held-to-maturity securities. As of March 31, 2005, the remaining unamortized unrealized gain of the respective held-to-maturity securities was $270,000.

We realized approximately $114,000 in net gains from the sale of $6,792,000 of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and $248,000 in net gains on the sale of $21,877,000 of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2004. Gross realized gains amounted to $114,000 on the sale of $6.7 million of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2005. Gross realized gains amounted to $312,000 on the sale of $10.9 million of available-for-sale securities

Page 31


Table of Contents

while gross realized losses amounted to $64,000 on the sale of $11.0 million of available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2004.

The following table shows the carrying value of investment securities according to contractual maturity classifications of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, (3) after five years through ten years, and (4) after ten years. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities because the mortgages underlying the securities may be called or prepaid with or without penalty. Therefore, these securities are not included in the maturity categories noted below as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):

                                                                                 
                    U.S. government     State and              
    U.S. Treasury     agency     municipal     Corporate        
    securities     securities     securities     securities     Totals  
    Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield     Amount     Yield  
March 31, 2005:
                                                                               
Securities available-for-sale:
                                                                               
Due in one year or less
  $       %   $       %   $       %   $       %   $       %
Due in one year to five years
                2,922       3.5 %     2,112       4.5 %     2,220       3.4 %     7,254       3.8 %
Due in five years to ten years
                22,569       4.7 %     10,396       5.2 %                 32,964       4.8 %
Due after ten years
                      %     2,385       5.5 %                 2,385       5.5 %
 
                                                           
 
  $       %   $ 25,490       4.5 %   $ 14,893       5.1 %   $ 2,220       3.4 %   $ 42,603       4.5 %
 
                                                           
Securities held-to-maturity:
                                                                               
Due in one year or less
  $       %   $       %   $ 189       4.1 %   $       %   $ 189       4.1 %
Due in one year to five years
                15,750       4.2 %     3,059       4.9 %                 18,801       4.3 %
Due in five years to ten years
                1,996       4.8 %     6,581       5.0 %                 8,317       5.0 %
Due after ten years
                      %           %                       %
 
                                                           
 
  $       %   $ 17,746       4.3 %   $ 9,830       5.0 %   $       %   $ 27,596       4.5 %
 
                                                           
December 31, 2004:
                                                                               
Securities available-for-sale:
                                                                               
Due in one year or less
  $       %   $       %   $       %   $       %   $       %
Due in one year to five years
                2,982       3.5 %                 2,270       3.4 %     5,252       3.5 %
Due in five years to ten years
                23,001       4.7 %     7,408       5.0 %                 30,410       4.7 %
Due after ten years
                1,291       5.5 %     5,094       5.4 %                 6,385       5.4 %
 
                                                           
 
  $       %   $ 27,274       4.6 %   $ 12,503       5.2 %   $ 2,270       3.4 %   $ 42,047       4.5 %
 
                                                           
Securities held-to-maturity:
                                                                               
Due in one year or less
  $       %   $       %   $       %   $       %   $       %
Due in one year to five years
                3,250       4.1 %     844       4.3 %                 4,094       4.2 %
Due in five years to ten years
                14,546       4.3 %     7,953       5.0 %                 22,450       4.6 %
Due after ten years
                      %     1,053       5.3 %                 1,052       5.3 %
 
                                                           
 
  $       %   $ 17,746       4.3 %   $ 9,850       5.0 %   $       %   $ 27,596       4.5 %
 
                                                           


(1)   We computed yields using coupon interest, adding discount accretion or subtracting premium amortization, as appropriate, on a ratable basis over the life of each security. We computed the weighted average yield for each maturity range using the acquisition price of each security in that range.

Page 32


Table of Contents

At March 31, 2005, the fair value of our mortgage-backed securities portfolio approximated $132.0 million compared to $138.5 million at December 31, 2004. All of these securities were included in our securities available-for-sale portfolio. A statistical comparison of our mortgage-backed portfolio at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 follows:

                 
    March 31, 2005     December 31, 2004  
Weighted average life
  4.62 years          5.01 years
Weighted average coupon
    5.21 %     5.18 %
Tax equivalent yield
    4.35 %     4.46 %
Modified duration (*)
    3.21 %     3.63 %


    (*) Modified duration represents an approximation of the change in value of a security for every 100 basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates.

At March 31, 2005, included in securities were the following investments with unrealized losses. The information below classifies these investments according to the term of the unrealized loss of less than twelve months or twelve months or longer (dollars in thousands):

                                                 
    Investments With an     Investments With an     Total Investments at  
    Unrealized Loss of     Unrealized Loss of     March 31, 2005 With  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or longer     an Unrealized Loss  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
U.S. government agency securities
  $ 41,516     $ 969     $     $     $ 41,516     $ 969  
Mortgage-backed securities
    109,259       2,338       14,254       513       123,513       2,851  
State and municipal securities
    16,188       468       1,059       47       17,247       515  
Corporate notes
    1,753       69       467       22       2,220       91  
 
                                   
Total temporarily-impaired securities
  $ 168,716     $ 3,844     $ 15,780     $ 582     $ 184,496     $ 4,426  
 
                                   

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) our intent and ability to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. At March 31, 2005, we had several issuances that had been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months. At March 31, 2005, the amortized cost of these securities was approximately $16,362,000 compared to a fair value of $15,780,000. Because the declines in fair value noted above were attributable to increases in interest rates and not attributable to credit quality and because Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Deposits and Other Borrowings. We had approximately $619 million of deposits at March 31, 2005 compared to $571 million at December 31, 2004. Our deposits consist of noninterest and interest-bearing demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and time deposits. Additionally, we entered into agreements with certain customers to sell certain of our securities under agreements to repurchase the security the following day. These agreements (which provide customers with short-term returns for their excess funds) amounted to $46.4 million at March 31, 2005 compared to $31.9 million at December 31, 2004. Additionally, at March 31 2005, we had borrowed $51.5 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati compared to $51.5 million at December 31, 2004.

Generally, banks classify their funding base as either core funding or non-core funding. Core funding consists of all deposits other than time deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or greater while all other funding is deemed to be non-core. The following table represents the balances of our deposits and other fundings and the percentage of each type to the total at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):

Page 33


Table of Contents

                                 
    March 31, 2005     December 31, 2004  
    Amount     Percentage     Amount     Percentage  
Core funding:
                               
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
  $ 119,212       16.4 %   $ 114,318       17.2 %
Interest-bearing demand deposits
    57,113       7.9       51,752       7.8  
Savings and money market deposits
    207,535       28.5       199,058       29.9  
Time deposits less than $100,000
    42,694       5.9       39,805       5.9  
 
                       
Total core funding
    426,554       58.7       404,933       60.8  
 
                       
Non-core funding:
                               
Time deposits greater than $100,000:
                               
Public funds
    70,687       9.7       61,377       9.2  
Brokered deposits
    53,278       7.3       43,431       6.5  
Other time deposits greater than $100,000
    68,502       9.4       60,986       9.2  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    46,388       6.4       31,928       4.8  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    51,500       7.1       53,500       8.0  
Subordinated debt
    10,310       1.4       10,310       1.5  
 
                       
Total non-core funding
    300,665       41.3       261,532       39.2  
 
                       
Total deposits and other funding
  $ 727,219       100.0 %   $ 666,465       100.0 %
 
                       

The amount of time deposits issued in amounts of $100,000 or more as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 amounted to $192.5 million and $165.8 million, respectively. The following table shows our time deposits over $100,000 by category at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, based on time remaining until maturity of (1) three months or less, (2) over three but less than six months, (3) over six but less than twelve months and (4) over twelve months (dollars in thousands):

                 
    March 31, 2005     December 31, 2004  
Three months or less
  $ 50,138     $ 54,274  
Over three but less than six months
    60,187       35,824  
Over six but less than twelve months
    29,765       27,627  
Over twelve months
    52,377       48,069  
 
           
Total time deposits greater than $100,000
  $ 192,467     $ 165,794  
 
           

Subordinated debt. In 2003, we established PNFP Statutory Trust I (“Trust”), a wholly-owned statutory business trust. Pinnacle Financial is the sole sponsor of the trust and owns $310,000 of the Trust’s common securities. The Trust was created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities (“Trust Preferred Securities”) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 and using the proceeds from the issuance of the common and preferred securities to purchase $10,310,000 of junior subordinated debentures (“Subordinated Debentures”) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trust are the Subordinated Debentures. Pinnacle Financial’s $310,000 investment in the Trust is included in other assets and the $10,310,000 obligation of Pinnacle Financial is included in subordinated debt.

The Trust Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption. Pinnacle Financial guarantees the payment of distributions and payments for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the Trust. Pinnacle Financial’s obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trust under the Trust Preferred Securities.

The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured, bear an interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (equal to the spread paid by the Trust on the Trust Preferred Securities) which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. Interest is payable quarterly. Pinnacle Financial may defer the payment of interest at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that the deferral period does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and Pinnacle Financial’s ability to pay dividends on our common shares will be restricted.

Page 34


Table of Contents

Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred Securities may be redeemed prior to maturity at our option on or after September 17, 2008. The Trust Preferred Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in the event of unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to federal income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the parent company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming non-deductible for federal tax purposes, (3) the requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or (4) loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as “Tier I capital” under the Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.

Capital Resources. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our stockholders’ equity amounted to $57.7 million and $57.9 million, respectively. The change in stockholders’ equity between December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 was attributable to our net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 of $1.8 million and the net decrease in comprehensive income of $2.0 million attributable to the decrease in the unrealized fair value of our available-for-sale securities portfolio. Additionally, during the first three months of 2005, we received approximately $8,000 in proceeds from our associates through the exercise of incentive stock options granted to them previously.

Generally, banking laws and regulations require banks and bank holding companies to maintain certain minimum capital ratios in order to engage in certain activities or be eligible for certain types of regulatory relief. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our capital ratios, including Pinnacle National’s capital ratios, met regulatory minimum capital requirements. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Pinnacle National was categorized as “well-capitalized”. To be categorized as “well-capitalized”, Pinnacle National must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. Additionally, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National must maintain certain minimum capital ratios for regulatory purposes. The following table presents actual, minimum and “well-capitalized” capital amounts and ratios at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:

                                                 
                                    Minimum  
                                    To Be “Well-Capitalized”  
                    Minimum     Under Prompt  
                    Capital     Corrective  
    Actual     Requirement     Action Provisions  
    Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio     Amount     Ratio  
At March 31, 2005
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 76,165       11.5 %   $ 53,031       8.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 68,235       10.3 %   $ 52,919       8.0 %   $ 66,148     10.0 %
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 69,967       10.6 %   $ 26,516       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 62,027       9.4 %   $ 26,459       4.0 %   $ 39,689       6.0 %
Tier I capital to average assets (*):
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 69,967       9.4 %   $ 30,275       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 62,027       8.2 %   $ 30,165       4.0 %   $ 37,706       5.0 %
At December 31, 2004
                                               
Total capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 73,540       12.7 %   $ 46,410       8.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 63,775       11.0 %   $ 46,373       8.0 %   $ 57,967       10.0 %
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets:
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 67,880       11.7 %   $ 23,205       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 58,115       10.0 %   $ 23,187       4.0 %   $ 34,780       6.0 %
Tier I capital to average assets (*):
                                               
Pinnacle Financial
  $ 67,880       9.7 %   $ 28,134       4.0 %   not applicable
Pinnacle National
  $ 58,115       8.3 %   $ 28,116       4.0 %   $ 35,145       5.0 %


(*)   Average assets for the above calculations were as of the most recent quarter for each period noted.

Dividends. Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial under federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the “OCC”. We, in turn, are also subject to limits on payment of dividends to our shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of federal banking authorities. We have not paid any dividends to date, nor do we anticipate paying dividends to our shareholders for the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy will depend on Pinnacle National’s earnings, capital position, financial condition and other factors.

Page 35


Table of Contents

Return on Assets and Stockholders’ Equity. The following table shows return on average assets (net income divided by average total assets), return on average equity (net income divided by average stockholders’ equity), dividend payout ratio (dividends declared per share divided by net income per share) and stockholders’ equity to asset ratio (average stockholders’ equity divided by average total assets) for the three month period ended March 31, 2005 compared to the year ended December 31, 2004.

                 
    2005     2004  
Return on average assets
    0.96 %     0.89 %
Return on average equity
    12.48 %     12.31 %
Dividend payout ratio
    %     %
Average equity to average assets ratio
    7.72 %     7.23 %


(1)   The return on average assets and return on average equity for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was computed by annualizing the numerator to a twelve-month period.

Market and Liquidity Risk Management

Our objective is to manage assets and liabilities to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies. Our Asset Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) is charged with the responsibility of monitoring these policies, which are designed to ensure acceptable composition of asset/liability mix. Two critical areas of focus for ALCO are interest rate sensitivity and liquidity risk management.

Interest Rate Sensitivity. In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk arising from fluctuations in interest rates. ALCO measures and evaluates the interest rate risk so that we can meet customer demands for various types of loans and deposits. ALCO determines the most appropriate amounts of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet items. Measurements which we use to help us manage interest rate sensitivity include an earnings simulation model, an economic value of equity model, and gap analysis computations. These measurements are used in conjunction with competitive pricing analysis.

Earnings simulation model. We believe that interest rate risk is best measured by our earnings simulation modeling. Forecasted levels of earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities, and off-balance sheet financial instruments are combined with ALCO forecasts of interest rates for the next 12 months and are combined with other factors in order to produce various earnings simulations. To limit interest rate risk, we have guidelines for our earnings at risk which seek to limit the variance of net income to less than 10 percent for a 200 basis point change up or down in rates from management’s most likely interest rate forecast over the next twelve months. The results of our current simulation model would indicate that our net interest income should increase with a gradual rise in interest rates over the next twelve months and decrease should interest rates fall over the same period.

Economic value of equity. Our economic value of equity model measures the extent that estimated economic values of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items will change as a result of interest rate changes. Economic values are determined by discounting expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, which establishes a base case economic value of equity. To help limit interest rate risk, we have a guideline stating that for an instantaneous 200 basis point change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity will not change by more than 20 percent from the base case.

Gap analysis. An asset or liability is considered to be interest rate-sensitive if it will reprice or mature within the time period analyzed; for example, within three months or one year. The interest rate-sensitivity gap is the difference between the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or reprice within such time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities (i.e., “asset sensitive”). A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the interest rate-sensitive assets (i.e., “liability sensitive). During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while

Page 36


Table of Contents

a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If our assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of any increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal. To assist us in managing our interest rate sensitivity, we have established a cumulative twelve-month interest rate-sensitivity gap ratio of earning assets to interest bearing liabilities of 75% to 125% in this time horizon.

Each of the above analyses may not, on their own, be an accurate indicator of how our net interest income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as “interest rate caps and floors”) which limit changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the maturity of certain instruments. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising interest rates. ALCO reviews each of the above interest rate sensitivity analyses along with several different interest rate scenarios as part of its responsibility to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies.

We may also use derivative financial instruments to improve the balance between interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and as one tool to manage our interest rate sensitivity while continuing to meet the credit and deposit needs of our customers. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had not entered into any derivative contracts to assist managing our interest rate sensitivity.

Liquidity Risk Management. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that there are sufficient cash flows to satisfy loan demand, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs. Traditional sources of liquidity for a bank include asset maturities and growth in core deposits. A bank may achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of its assets and liabilities and by internally generated funding through its operations. Funds invested in marketable instruments that can be readily sold and the continuous maturing of other earning assets are sources of liquidity from an asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of liquidity through attraction of increased deposits and borrowing funds from various other institutions.

Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in response to market rates and our management intends to continue this practice. If deposits are not priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect our liquidity position.

Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions and competition. Additionally, debt security investments are subject to prepayment and call provisions that could accelerate their payoff prior to stated maturity. We attempt to price our deposit products to meet our asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions. Our ALCO is responsible for monitoring our ongoing liquidity needs. Our regulators also monitor our liquidity and capital resources on a periodic basis.

In addition, Pinnacle National is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. As a result, Pinnacle National receives advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, pursuant to the terms of various borrowing agreements, which assist it in the funding of its home mortgage and commercial real estate loan portfolios. Pinnacle National has pledged under the borrowing agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati certain qualifying residential mortgage loans and, pursuant to a blanket lien, all qualifying commercial mortgage loans as collateral. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle National had received advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati totaling $51.5 million at the following rates and maturities (dollars in thousands):

Page 37


Table of Contents

                 
    Amount     Interest Rate  
June 14, 2005
  $ 12,000       2.94 %
September 15, 2005
    5,000       3.15  
October 14, 2005
    3,000       3.10  
December 30, 2005
    3,000       2.40  
January 27, 2006
    2,000       2.79  
March 12, 2006
    3,000       1.97  
March 31, 2006
    4,000       2.10  
April 17, 2006
    2,000       2.64  
April 28, 2006
    1,500       2.52  
May 19, 2006
    10,000       3.01  
September 30, 2006
    4,000       2.39  
January 26, 2007
    2,000       3.24  
 
             
 
  $ 51,500          
 
             
Weighted average interest rate
            2.77 %
 
             

At March 31, 2005, brokered certificates of deposit approximated $53.3 million which represented 7.3% of total fundings compared to $43.4 million and 6.5% at December 31, 2004. We issue these brokered certificates through several different brokerage houses based on competitive bid. Typically, these funds are for varying maturities from six months to two years and are issued at rates which are competitive to rates we would be required to pay to attract similar deposits from the local market as well as rates for Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati advances of similar maturities. We consider these deposits to be a ready source of liquidity under current market conditions.

At March 31, 2005, we had no significant commitments for capital expenditures. However, we are in the process of developing our branch network in Davidson, Williamson and Sumner counties. As a result, we anticipate that we will enter into contracts to buy property or construct branch facilities and/or lease agreements to lease facilities in Davidson, Williamson and Sumner counties.

The following table presents additional information about our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2005, which by their terms have contractual maturity and termination dates subsequent to March 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):

                                         
    Next 12     13-36     37-60     More than        
    Months     Months     Months     60 Months     Totals  
Contractual obligations:
                                       
Certificates of deposit
  $ 171,804     $ 55,705     $ 7,652     $     $ 235,161  
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
    46,388                         46,388  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    32,000       19,500                   51,500  
Subordinated debt
                      10,310       10,310  
Minimum operating lease commitments
    795       1,660       1,754       2,034       6,243  
 
                             
Totals
  $ 250,987     $ 76,865     $ 9,406     $ 12,344     $ 349,602  
 
                             

Our management believes that we have adequate liquidity to meet all known contractual obligations and unfunded commitments, including loan commitments and reasonable borrower, depositor, and creditor requirements over the next twelve months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. At March 31, 2005, we had outstanding standby letters of credit of $51.4 million and unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $209.5 million. Because these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed to fund these outstanding commitments, Pinnacle National has the ability to liquidate Federal funds sold or securities available-for-sale, or on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase Federal funds from other financial institutions. At March 31, 2005, Pinnacle National had accommodations with upstream correspondent banks for unsecured short-term advances. These accommodations have various covenants related to their term and availability, and in most cases must be repaid within less than a month. The following table presents additional information about our unfunded commitments as of March 31, 2005, which by their terms have contractual maturity dates subsequent to March 31, 2005 (dollars in thousands):

Page 38


Table of Contents

                                         
    Next 12     13-36     37-60     More than        
    Months     Months     Months     60 Months     Totals  
Unfunded commitments:
                                       
Letters of credit
  $ 43,082     $ 8,348     $     $     $ 51,430  
Lines of credit
    103,753       53,507       10,205       42,079       209,544  
 
                             
Totals
  $ 146,835     $ 61,855     $ 10,205     $ 42,079     $ 260,974  
 
                             

Impact of Inflation

The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than the effects of general levels of inflation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF 03-1 provides guidance for determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether impairment is other-than-temporary, and measurement of an impairment loss. An investment is considered impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost. Generally, an impairment is considered other-than-temporary unless: (i) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment; and (ii) evidence indicating that the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. If impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss should be recognized equal to the difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value. Certain disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 were adopted in 2003 and Pinnacle Financial began presenting the new disclosure requirements in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. The recognition and measurement provisions were initially effective for other-than-temporary impairment evaluations in reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004. However, in September 2004, the effective date of these provisions was delayed until the finalization of a FASB Staff Position (FSP) to provide additional implementation guidance. Due to the recognition and measurement provisions being suspended and the final rule delayed, we are not able to determine whether the adoption of these new provisions will have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of income.

Statement of Position 03-03, Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer (SOP 03-03) addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor’s initial investment in loans or debt securities (loans) acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. It includes loans acquired in purchase business combinations and applies to all nongovernmental entities, including not-for-profit organizations. The SOP does not apply to loans originated by the entity. The SOP is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. Early adoption is encouraged. Specific transition guidance applies to certain loans that currently are within the scope of Practice Bulletin 6, Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans. Adoption of SOP 03-03 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of Pinnacle Financial.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123R”), which revised SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. This statement supercedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” The revised statement addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees and other third parties, eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB 25 and requires that the compensation costs relating to such transactions be recognized in the consolidated statement of income. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission deferred implementation of SFAS No. 123R for registrants until the next fiscal year following June 15, 2005. We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and will adopt it on January 1, 2006 as required.

Page 39


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information required by this Item 3 is included on pages 36 through 39 of Item 2 - “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pinnacle Financial maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Pinnacle Financial’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pinnacle Financial carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Pinnacle Financial’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Controls

There were no changes in Pinnacle Financial’s internal control over financial reporting during Pinnacle Financial’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Pinnacle Financial’s internal control over financial reporting.

Page 40


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which any of their property is the subject.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) Not applicable

(b) Not applicable

(c) The Company did not repurchase any shares of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2005

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

         
  3.1    
Amended and Restated Charter of Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., as amended (Restated for SEC electronic filing purposes only)
  10.1    
2005 Annual Cash Incentive Plan*
  10.2    
Fourth amendment to Commerce Street Lease
  31.1    
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
  31.2    
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
  32.1    
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  32.2    
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 – Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


*   Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and are subject to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

Page 41


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
  PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
 
 
  /s/ M. Terry Turner    
  M. Terry Turner   
May 6, 2005  President and Chief Executive Officer   
 
         
     
  /s/ Harold R. Carpenter    
  Harold R. Carpenter   
May 6, 2005  Chief Financial Officer   
 

Page 42