Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number 00-24525
Cumulus Media Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
36-4159663 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
14 Piedmont Center
Suite 1400
Atlanta, GA 30305
(404) 949-0700
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrants principal
offices)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Class A Common Stock; Par Value $.01 per share
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
The aggregate market value of the registrants outstanding
voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of June 30, 2004, the last business day of
the registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter, was approximately $832.4 million, based on
69,911,346 shares outstanding and a last reported per share
price of Class A Common Stock on the NASDAQ National Market
of $16.81 on that date. As of February 28, 2005, the
registrant had outstanding 69,090,084 shares of common
stock consisting of (i) 56,814,454 shares of
Class A Common Stock; (ii) 11,630,759 shares of
Class B Common Stock; and (iii) 644,871 shares of
Class C Common Stock.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Portions of the registrants Proxy Statement for the 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or prior to March 31,
2005, have been incorporated by reference in
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CUMULUS MEDIA INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
1
PART 1
Certain Definitions
In this Form 10-K the terms Company,
Cumulus, we, us, and
our refer to Cumulus Media Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
We use the term local marketing agreement
(LMA) in various places in this report. A typical
LMA is an agreement under which a Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) licensee of a radio station makes
available, for a fee, air time on its station to another party.
The other party provides programming to be broadcast during such
airtime and collects revenues from advertising it sells for
broadcast during such programming. In addition to entering into
LMAs, we will from time to time enter into management or
consulting agreements that provide us with the ability, as
contractually specified, to assist current owners in the
management of radio station assets that we have contracted to
purchase, subject to FCC approval. In such arrangements, we
generally receive a contractually specified management fee or
consulting fee in exchange for the services provided.
We also use the term joint services agreement
(JSA) in several places in this report. A typical
JSA is an agreement which authorizes one party or station to
sell another stations advertising time and retain the
revenue from the sale of that airtime. A JSA typically includes
a periodic payment to the station whose airtime is being sold
(which may include a share of the revenue being collected from
the sale of airtime).
Unless otherwise indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
we obtained total radio industry listener and revenue levels
from the Radio Advertising Bureau (RAB); |
|
|
|
we derived historical market revenue statistics and market
revenue share percentages from data published by Miller Kaplan,
Arase & Co., LLP (Miller Kaplan), a public
accounting firm that specializes in serving the broadcasting
industry; |
|
|
|
we derived all audience share data and audience rankings,
including ranking by population, except where otherwise stated
to the contrary, from surveys of people ages 12 and over
(Adults 12+), listening Monday through Sunday,
6 a.m. to 12 midnight, and based on the Fall 2004 Arbitron
Market Report, referred to as Arbitrons Market Report,
pertaining to each market; and |
|
|
|
all dollar amounts are rounded to the nearest million, unless
otherwise indicated. |
The term Station Operating Income is used in various
places in this document. Station Operating Income consists of
operating income (loss) before depreciation, amortization, LMA
fees, corporate general and administrative expenses, non cash
stock compensation expense and restructuring and impairment
charges (credits).
Station Operating Income serves as a starting point for our
management to analyze the cash flow generated by our business by
measuring the profitability of our station portfolio and its
contribution to the funding of our other operating expenses and
to the funding of debt service and acquisitions. Station
Operating Income isolates the amount of income generated solely
by our stations and assists our management in evaluating the
earnings potential of our station portfolio.
In deriving this measure, we exclude depreciation and
amortization due to the insignificant investment in tangible
assets required to operate our stations and the relatively
insignificant amount of intangible assets subject to
amortization. We exclude LMA fees from this measure, even though
it requires a cash commitment, due to the insignificance and
temporary nature of such fees. Corporate expenses, despite
representing an additional significant cash commitment, are
excluded in an effort to present the operating performance of
our stations exclusive of the corporate resources employed. We
believe this is important to our investors as it highlights the
gross margin generated by our station portfolio. Finally, we
exclude non
2
cash stock compensation and restructuring and impairment charges
(credits) from the measure as they do not represent cash
payments related to the operation of the stations.
We believe that Station Operating Income, although not a measure
that is calculated in accordance with GAAP, nevertheless is the
most frequently used financial measure in determining the market
value of a radio station or group of stations. We have observed
that Station Operating Income is commonly employed by firms that
provide appraisal services to the broadcast industry in valuing
radio stations. Further, in each of the more than 140 radio
station acquisitions we have completed since our inception, we
have used Station Operating Income as our primary metric to
evaluate and negotiate the purchase price paid. Given its
relevance to the estimated value of a radio station, we believe,
and our experience indicates, that investors consider the metric
to be extremely useful in order to determine the value of our
portfolio of stations. We believe that Station Operating Income
is the most commonly used financial measure employed by the
investment community to compare the performance of radio station
operators.
Finally, Station Operating Income is the primary metric that our
management uses to evaluate the performance and results of our
stations. Our management uses the measure to assess the
performance of our station managers and our Board of Directors
uses it to determine the relative performance of our executive
management. As a result, in disclosing Station Operating Income,
we are providing our stockholders, and the public, with an
analysis of our performance that is consistent with that
utilized by our management.
Station Operating Income should not be considered in isolation
or as a substitute for net income, operating income (loss), cash
flows from operating activities or any other measure for
determining our operating performance or liquidity that is
calculated in accordance with GAAP. See Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for a quantitative
reconciliation of Station Operating Income to its most directly
comparable financial measure calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP.
Company Overview
We own and operate FM and AM radio station clusters
serving mid-size markets throughout the United States. We are
the second largest radio broadcasting company in the United
States based on the number of stations owned or operated.
According to Arbitrons Market Report and data published by
Miller Kaplan, we have assembled market-leading groups or
clusters of radio stations that rank first or second in terms of
revenue share or audience share in substantially all of our
markets. As of December 31, 2004, we owned and operated
291 radio stations in 59 mid-sized U.S. media
markets. In addition, we own and operate a multi-market network
of five radio stations in the English-speaking Caribbean. Under
our LMAs, we provide sales and marketing services for twelve
radio stations in six U.S. markets in exchange for a
management or consulting fee, pending FCC approval of our
acquisitions of these stations. We will own and operate a total
of 304 stations in 61 U.S. markets upon FCC approval
and consummation of all of our pending acquisitions.
Relative to the 50 largest markets in the United States, we
believe that the mid-size markets represent attractive operating
environments and generally are characterized by:
|
|
|
|
|
a greater use of radio advertising as evidenced by the greater
percentage of total media revenues captured by radio than the
national average; |
|
|
|
rising advertising revenues, as the larger national and regional
retailers expand into these markets; |
|
|
|
small independent operators, many of whom lack the capital to
produce high-quality locally originated programming or to employ
more sophisticated research, marketing, management and sales
techniques; and |
|
|
|
lower overall susceptibility to economic downturns. |
We believe that the attractive operating characteristics of
mid-size markets, together with the relaxation of radio station
ownership limits under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the
Telecom
3
Act) and FCC rules, create significant opportunities for
growth from the formation of groups of radio stations within
these markets. We believe that mid-size radio markets provide an
excellent opportunity to acquire attractive properties at
favorable purchase prices due to the size and fragmented nature
of ownership in these markets and to the greater attention
historically given to the larger markets by radio station
acquirers. According to the FCCs records, as of
December 31, 2004 there were 8,751 FM and
4,774 AM stations in the United States.
To maximize the advertising revenues and Station Operating
Income of our stations, we seek to enhance the quality of radio
programs for listeners and the attractiveness of our radio
stations to advertisers in a given market. We also seek to
increase the amount of locally originated programming content
that airs on each station. Within each market, our stations are
diversified in terms of format, target audience and geographic
location, enabling us to attract larger and broader listener
audiences and thereby a wider range of advertisers. This
diversification, coupled with our competitive advertising
pricing, also has provided us with the ability to compete
successfully for advertising revenue against other radio, print
and television media competitors.
We believe that we are in a position to generate revenue growth,
increase audience and revenue shares within these markets and,
by capitalizing on economies of scale and by competing against
other media for incremental advertising revenue, increase our
Station Operating Income growth rates and margins to those
levels found in large markets. Many of our markets are still in
the development stage with the potential for substantial growth
as we implement our operating strategy.
We are a Delaware corporation, organized in 2002, and successor
by merger to an Illinois corporation with the same name that had
been organized in 1997.
Strategy
We are focused on generating internal growth through improvement
in Station Operating Income for the portfolio of stations we
operate, while enhancing our station portfolio and our business
as a whole, through the acquisition of individual stations or
clusters that satisfy our acquisition criteria.
Our operating strategy has the following principal components:
|
|
|
|
|
achieve cost efficiencies associated with common infrastructure
and personnel and increase revenue by offering regional coverage
of key demographic groups that were previously unavailable to
national and regional advertisers; |
|
|
|
develop each station in our portfolio as a unique enterprise,
marketed as an individual, local brand with its own identity,
programming content, programming personnel, inventory of time
slots and sales force; |
|
|
|
use audience research and music testing to refine each
stations programming content to match the preferences of
the stations target demographic audience, in order to
enrich our listeners experiences by increasing both the
quality and quantity of local programming; and |
|
|
|
position station clusters to compete with print and television
advertising by combining favorable advertising pricing with
diverse station formats within each market to draw a larger and
broader listening audience to attract a wider range of
advertisers. |
Our acquisition strategy has the following principal components:
|
|
|
|
|
assemble leading station clusters in the top 50 to 250 radio
markets by taking advantage of the size and fragmented nature of
ownership in these markets; |
4
|
|
|
|
|
acquire leading stations in terms of signal coverage, revenue or
audience share and acquire under-performing stations where there
is significant potential to apply our management expertise to
improve financial and operating performance; and |
|
|
|
reconfigure our existing stations, or acquire new stations,
located near large markets, that based on an engineering
analysis of signal specifications and the likelihood of
receiving FCC approval, can be redirected, or
moved-in, to those larger markets. |
Acquisitions and Dispositions
We completed the acquisition of 25 radio stations in 6 markets
and a tract of land for a tower site during the year ended
December 31, 2004. Of the $93.7 million required to
fund these acquisitions, $11.0 million was paid in cash,
$71.3 million was paid in the form of shares of our
Class A Common Stock, $5.2 million was deferred beyond
the closing of the transactions, $1.4 million represented
capitalizable acquisition costs and $4.8 million had been
previously funded as escrow deposits on the pending
acquisitions. Of the $5.2 million of deferred purchase
price, we began to pay $5.0 million of the amount in
60 monthly cash installments commencing in April 2004,
consistent with the terms of the particular purchase agreement.
We will pay the remaining $0.2 million of deferred purchase
price upon resolution of certain post-closing issues. These
aggregate acquisition amounts include the assets acquired
pursuant to the select transactions highlighted below.
|
|
|
Rochester, Minnesota and Sioux Falls, South Dakota |
On March 29, 2004, we completed the acquisition of Southern
Minnesota Broadcasting Co. (SMB), which owned and
operated three radio stations serving Rochester, Minnesota
(KROC-AM, KROC-FM, KYBA-FM) and six radio stations serving Sioux
Falls, South Dakota (KYBB-FM, KIKN-FM, KKLS-FM, KMXC-FM,
KSOO-AM, KXRB-AM). In acquiring SMB, we issued the former owners
3,223,978 shares of our Class A Common Stock and
deferred $5.0 million of the purchase price beyond the
closing of the transaction. We also paid $0.5 million in
capitalizable acquisition costs in connection with the
acquisition.
On July 30, 2004, we completed the acquisition of WBWR-FM,
WBRW-FM, WFNR-FM, WFNR-AM, WPSK-FM, WRAD-AM and WWBU-FM serving
Blacksburg, Virginia from New River Valley Radio Partners,
L.L.C. In connection with the acquisition, we paid
$2.1 million in cash, deferred $0.1 million beyond
closing of the transaction and paid $0.2 million in
capitalizable acquisition costs. We had previously funded
$4.7 million of the purchase price in 2003 in the form of
an escrow deposit.
As of December 31, 2004, we were a party to various
agreements to acquire 13 stations across 7 markets.
The aggregate purchase price of those pending acquisitions is
expected to be approximately $81.6 million,
$70.3 million of which we may, at our option, pay in shares
of our Class A Common Stock.
Subsequent to December 31, 2004 and through March 4,
2005, we completed the acquisition of ten radio stations across
four markets for $46.8 million in cash.
Periodically, the FCC makes FM frequencies available for
acquisition through an auction process. On November 3,
2004, the FCC held an auction for approximately 290 frequencies,
located mostly in remote areas of the country, in which we
actively participated. As of the close of the auction, we were
the winning bidder for seven frequencies and are obligated to
pay the FCC $8.6 million. As of December 31, 2004, we
had funded $2.2 million toward our obligation to the FCC in
the form of an escrow deposit, to be applied
5
by the FCC to the bid price upon grant of the final
authorization for the frequencies. These seven authorizations
will enable us to add a station to seven of our existing markets
once constructed.
|
|
|
Acquisition Shelf Registration Statement |
We have registered an aggregate of 20,000,000 shares of our
Class A Common Stock, pursuant to registration statements
on Form S-4, for issuance from time to time in connection
with our acquisition of other businesses, properties or
securities in business combination transactions utilizing a
shelf registration process. As of March 4,
2005, we had issued 5,666,553 of the 20,000,000 shares
registered in connection with various acquisitions.
Industry Overview
The primary source of revenues for radio stations is the sale of
advertising time to local, regional and national spot
advertisers and national network advertisers. National spot
advertisers assist advertisers in placing their advertisements
in a specific market. National network advertisers place
advertisements on a national network show and such
advertisements will air in each market where the network has an
affiliate. During the past decade, local advertising revenue as
a percentage of total radio advertising revenue in a given
market has ranged from approximately 72% to 87%. The growth in
total radio advertising revenue tends to be fairly stable. With
the exception of 1991 and 2001, when total radio advertising
revenue fell by approximately 3% and 8%, respectively,
advertising revenue has generally risen in each of the past
19 years faster than both inflation and the gross national
product.
Radio is considered an efficient, cost-effective means of
reaching specifically identified demographic groups. Stations
are typically classified by their on-air format, such as
country, rock, adult contemporary, oldies and news/ talk. A
stations format and style of presentation enables it to
target specific segments of listeners sharing certain
demographic features. By capturing a specific share of a
markets radio listening audience, with particular
concentration in a targeted demographic, a station is able to
market its broadcasting time to advertisers seeking to reach a
specific audience. Advertisers and stations use data published
by audience measuring services, such as Arbitron, to estimate
how many people within particular geographical markets and
demographics listen to specific stations.
The number of advertisements that can be broadcast without
jeopardizing listening levels and the resulting ratings are
limited in part by the format of a particular station and the
local competitive environment. Although the number of
advertisements broadcast during a given time period may vary,
the total number of advertisements broadcast on a particular
station generally does not vary significantly from year to year.
A stations local sales staff generates the majority of its
local and regional advertising sales through direct
solicitations of local advertising agencies and businesses. To
generate national advertising sales, a station usually will
engage a firm that specializes in soliciting radio-advertising
sales on a national level. National sales representatives obtain
advertising principally from advertising agencies located
outside the stations market and receive commissions based
on the revenue from the advertising they obtain.
Our stations compete for advertising revenue with other
terrestrial-based radio stations in the market (including low
power FM radio stations that are required to operate on a
noncommercial basis) as well as other media, including
newspapers, broadcast television, cable television, magazines,
direct mail, coupons and outdoor advertising. In addition, the
radio broadcasting industry is subject to competition from
services that use new media technologies that are being
developed or have already been introduced, such as the Internet
and satellite-based digital radio services. Such services reach
nationwide and regional audiences with multi-channel,
multi-format, digital radio services that have a sound quality
equivalent to that of compact discs. Competition among
terrestrial-based radio stations has also been heightened by the
introduction of terrestrial digital audio broadcasting (which is
digital audio broadcasting delivered through earth-based
equipment rather than satellites). The FCC currently allows
terrestrial radio stations like ours to commence the use of
digital technology through a hybrid antenna that
carries both the pre-existing
6
analog signal and the new digital signal. The FCC is conducting
a proceeding that could result in a radio stations use of
two antennae: one for the analog signal and one for the digital
signal.
We cannot predict how existing or new sources of competition
will affect the revenues generated by our stations. The radio
broadcasting industry historically has grown despite the
introduction of new technologies for the delivery of
entertainment and information, such as television broadcasting,
cable television, audio tapes and compact discs. A growing
population and greater availability of radios, particularly car
and portable radios, have contributed to this growth. There can
be no assurance, however, that the development or introduction
in the future of any new media technology will not have an
adverse effect on the radio broadcasting industry in general or
our stations in particular.
Advertising Sales
Virtually all of our revenue is generated from the sale of
local, regional and national advertising for broadcast on our
radio stations. Approximately 87%, 85% and 85% of our net
broadcasting revenue was generated from the sale of local and
regional advertising in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Additional broadcasting revenue is generated from the sale of
national advertising. The major categories of our advertisers
include:
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive Dealers
|
|
Telecommunications |
|
Banking and Mortgage |
Amusement and Recreation
|
|
Food Services and Drinking |
|
Arts and Entertainment |
Healthcare Services
|
|
Food and Beverage Stores |
|
Furniture and Home Furnishings |
Each stations local sales staff solicits advertising
either directly from the local advertiser or indirectly through
an advertising agency. We employ a tiered commission structure
to focus our individual sales staffs on new business
development. Consistent with our operating strategy of dedicated
sales forces for each of our stations, we have also increased
the number of salespeople per station. We believe that we can
outperform the traditional growth rates of our markets by
(1) expanding our base of advertisers, (2) training
newly hired sales people and (3) providing a higher level
of service to our existing customer base. This requires larger
sales staffs than most of the stations employ at the time they
are acquired by Cumulus. We support our strategy of building
local direct accounts by employing personnel in each of our
markets to produce custom commercials that respond to the needs
of our advertisers. In addition, in-house production provides
advertisers greater flexibility in changing their commercial
messages with minimal lead-time.
Our national sales are made by Interep National Radio Sales,
Inc., a firm specializing in radio advertising sales on the
national level, in exchange for a commission that is based on
our net revenue from the advertising obtained. Regional sales,
which we define as sales in regions surrounding our markets to
buyers that advertise in our markets, are generally made by our
local sales staff and market managers. Whereas we seek to grow
our local sales through larger and more customer-focused sales
staffs, we seek to grow our national and regional sales by
offering to key national and regional advertisers groups of
stations within specific markets and regions that make our
stations more attractive. Many of these large accounts have
previously been reluctant to advertise in these markets because
of the logistics involved in buying advertising from individual
stations. Certain of our stations had no national representation
before we acquired them.
The number of advertisements that can be broadcast without
jeopardizing listening levels and the resulting ratings are
limited in part by the format of a particular station. We
estimate the optimal number of advertisements available for sale
depending on the programming format of a particular station.
Each of our stations has a general target level of on-air
inventory that it makes available for advertising. This target
level of inventory for sale may be different at different times
of the day but tends to remain stable over time. Our stations
strive to maximize revenue by managing their on-air inventory of
advertising time and adjusting prices up or down based on supply
and demand. We seek to broaden our base of advertisers in each
of our markets by providing a wide array of audience demographic
segments across our cluster of
7
stations, thereby providing each of our potential advertisers
with an effective means of reaching a targeted demographic
group. Our selling and pricing activity is based on demand for
our radio stations on-air inventory and, in general, we
respond to this demand by varying prices rather than by varying
our target inventory level for a particular station. Most
changes in revenue are explained by some combination of
demand-driven pricing changes and changes in inventory
utilization rather than by changes in the available inventory.
Advertising rates charged by radio stations, which are generally
highest during morning and afternoon commuting hours, are based
primarily on:
|
|
|
|
|
a stations share of audiences generally, and in the
demographic groups targeted by advertisers (as measured by
ratings surveys); |
|
|
|
the supply of and demand for radio advertising time generally
and for time targeted at particular demographic groups; and |
|
|
|
certain additional qualitative factors. |
A stations listenership is reflected in ratings surveys
that estimate the number of listeners tuned to the station and
the time they spend listening. Each stations ratings are
used by its advertisers and advertising representatives to
consider advertising with the station and are used by Cumulus to
chart audience growth, set advertising rates and adjust
programming. The radio broadcast industrys principal
ratings service is Arbitron, which publishes periodic ratings
surveys for significant domestic radio markets. These surveys
are our primary source of ratings data.
We have an agreement with Arbitron that gives us access to
Arbitrons ratings materials in a majority of our markets
through July 2009.
Competition
The radio broadcasting industry is highly competitive. The
success of each of our stations depends largely upon its
audience ratings and its share of the overall advertising
revenue within its market. Our audience ratings and advertising
revenue are subject to change, and any adverse change in a
particular market affecting advertising expenditures or an
adverse change in the relative market positions of the stations
located in a particular market could have a material adverse
effect on the revenue of our radio stations located in that
market. There can be no assurance that any one or all of our
stations will be able to maintain or increase current audience
ratings or advertising revenue market share.
Our stations, including those to be acquired upon completion of
the pending acquisitions, compete for listeners and advertising
revenues directly with other radio stations within their
respective markets, as well as with other advertising media as
discussed below. Radio stations compete for listeners primarily
on the basis of program content that appeals to a particular
demographic group. By building a strong brand identity with a
targeted listener base consisting of specific demographic groups
in each of our markets, we are able to attract advertisers
seeking to reach those listeners. Companies that operate radio
stations must be alert to the possibility of another station
changing its format to compete directly for listeners and
advertisers. Another stations decision to convert to a
format similar to that of one of our radio stations in the same
geographic area or to launch an aggressive promotional campaign
may result in lower ratings and advertising revenue, increased
promotion and other expenses and, consequently, lower our
Station Operating Income.
Factors that are material to a radio stations competitive
position include station brand identity and loyalty, management
experience, the stations local audience rank in its
market, transmitter power and location, assigned frequency,
audience characteristics, local program acceptance and the
number and characteristics of other radio stations and other
advertising media in the market area. We attempt to improve our
competitive position in each market by extensively researching
and improving our stations programming, by implementing
advertising campaigns aimed at the demographic groups for which
our stations program and by managing our sales efforts to
attract a larger share of advertising dollars for each station
individually. However, we compete with some organizations that
have substantially greater financial or other resources than we
do.
8
In 1996, changes in federal law and FCC rules dramatically
increased the number of radio stations a single party could own
and operate in a local market. Our management continues to
believe that companies that elect to take advantage of those
changes by forming groups of commonly owned stations or joint
arrangements such as LMAs in a particular market may in certain
circumstances have lower operating costs and may be able to
offer advertisers in those markets more attractive rates and
services. Although we currently operate multiple stations in
each of our markets and intend to pursue the creation of
additional multiple station groups in particular markets, our
competitors in certain markets include other parties who own and
operate as many stations as we do or more stations than we do.
We may also compete with those other parties or broadcast groups
for the purchase of additional stations in those market or new
markets. Some of these other parties and groups are owned or
operated by companies that have substantially greater financial
or other resources than we do.
A radio stations competitive position can be enhanced by a
variety of factors, including changes in the stations
format and an upgrade of the stations authorized power.
However, the competitive position of existing radio stations is
protected to some extent by certain regulatory barriers to new
entrants. The operation of a radio broadcast station requires a
license from the FCC, and the number of radio stations that an
entity can operate in a given market is limited. Under FCC rules
that became effective in 2004, the number of radio stations that
a party can own in a particular market is dictated largely by
whether the station is an Arbitron Metro (a designation designed
by a private party for use in advertising matters), and, if so,
the number of stations included in that Arbitron Metro. In those
markets which are not an Arbitron Metro, the number of stations
a party can own in the particular market is dictated by the
availability of FM radio frequencies allotted by the FCC to
communities in that market and the reach of the AM signals in
that market. For a discussion of FCC regulation (including
recent changes), see Federal Regulation of
Radio Broadcasting.
Our stations also compete for advertising revenue with other
media, including low power FM radio stations (that are
required to operate on a noncommercial basis), newspapers,
broadcast television, cable and satellite television, magazines,
direct mail, coupons and outdoor advertising. In addition, the
radio broadcasting industry is subject to competition from
companies that use new media technologies that are being
developed or have already been introduced, such as the Internet
and the delivery of digital audio programming by cable
television systems, by satellite radio carriers, and by
terrestrial-based radio stations that broadcast digital audio
signals. The FCC has authorized two companies to provide a
digital audio programming service by satellite to nationwide
audiences with a multi-channel, multi-format and with sound
quality equivalent to that of compact discs. The FCC has also
authorized FM terrestrial stations like ours to use two separate
antennae to deliver both the current analog radio signal and a
new digital signal. The FCC is also exploring the possibility of
allowing AM stations to deliver both analog and digital signals.
We cannot predict how new sources of competition will affect our
performance and income. The radio broadcasting industry
historically has grown despite the introduction of new
technologies for the delivery of entertainment and information,
such as television broadcasting, cable television, audio tapes
and compact discs. A growing population and greater availability
of radios, particularly car and portable radios, have
contributed to this growth. There can be no assurance, however,
that the development or introduction in the future of any new
media technology will not have an adverse effect on the radio
broadcasting industry in general or our stations in particular.
We cannot predict what other matters might be considered in the
future by the FCC or the Congress, nor can we assess in advance
what impact, if any, the implementation of any of these
proposals or changes might have on our business.
Employees
At December 31, 2004, we employed approximately
2,900 people. None of our employees are covered by
collective bargaining agreements, and we consider our relations
with our employees to be satisfactory.
9
We employ several on-air personalities with large loyal
audiences in their respective markets. On occasion, we enter
into employment agreements with these personalities to protect
our interests in those relationships that we believe to be
valuable. The loss of one or more of these personalities could
result in a short-term loss of audience share, but we do not
believe that any such loss would have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition or results of operations, taken as a
whole.
We generally employ one market manager for each radio market in
which we own or operate stations. Each market manager is
responsible for all employees of the market and for managing all
aspects of the radio operations. On occasion, we enter into
employment agreements with market managers to protect our
interests in those relationships that we believe to be valuable.
The loss of a market manager could result in a short-term loss
of performance in a market, but we do not believe that any such
loss would have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition or results of operations, taken as a whole.
Federal Regulation of Radio Broadcasting
Introduction. The ownership, operation and sale of radio
broadcast stations, including those licensed to us, are subject
to the jurisdiction of the FCC, which acts under authority
derived from the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the
Communications Act). The Telecom Act amended the
Communications Act and directed the FCC to change certain of its
broadcast rules. Among its other regulatory responsibilities,
the FCC issues permits and licenses to construct and operate
radio stations; assigns broadcast frequencies; determines
whether to approve changes in ownership or control of station
licenses; regulates transmission equipment, operating power, and
other technical parameters of stations; adopts and implements
regulations and policies that directly or indirectly affect the
ownership, operation and employment practices of stations;
regulates the content of some forms of radio broadcast
programming; and has the authority under the Communications Act
to impose penalties for violations of its rules.
The following is a brief summary of certain provisions of the
Communications Act, the Telecom Act, and related FCC rules and
policies (collectively, the Communications Laws).
This description does not purport to be comprehensive, and
reference should be made to the Communications Laws, public
notices, and decisions issued by the FCC for further information
concerning the nature and extent of federal regulation of radio
broadcast stations. Failure to observe the provisions of the
Communications Laws can result in the imposition of various
sanctions, including monetary forfeitures and the grant of a
short-term (less than the maximum term) license
renewal. For particularly egregious violations, the FCC may deny
a stations license renewal application, revoke a
stations license, or deny applications in which an
applicant seeks to acquire additional broadcast properties.
License Grant and Renewal. Radio broadcast licenses are
granted and renewed for maximum terms of eight years. Licenses
are renewed by filing an application with the FCC. Petitions to
deny license renewal applications may be filed by interested
parties, including members of the public. We are not currently
aware of any facts that would prevent the timely renewal of our
licenses to operate our radio stations, although there can be no
assurance that each of our licenses will be renewed for a full
term without adverse conditions.
Service Areas. The area served by AM stations is
determined by a combination of frequency, transmitter power and
antenna orientation. To determine the effective service area of
an AM station, the stations power, operating frequency,
antenna patterns and its day/night operating modes are required.
The area served by an FM station is determined by a combination
of transmitter power and antenna height, with stations divided
into classes according to these technical parameters.
Class C FM stations operate with the equivalent of 100
kilowatts of effective radiated power (ERP) at an
antenna height of up to 1,968 feet above average terrain.
They are the most powerful FM stations, providing service to a
large area, typically covering one or more counties within a
state. Class B FM stations operate with the equivalent
of 50 kilowatts ERP at an antenna height of up to
492 feet above average terrain. Class B stations
typically serve large metropolitan areas as well as their
associated suburbs.
10
Class A FM stations operate with the equivalent of
6 kilowatts ERP at an antenna height of up to 328 feet
above average terrain, and generally serve smaller cities and
towns or suburbs of larger cities.
The minimum and maximum facilities requirements for an
FM station are determined by its class. FM class
designations depend upon the geographic zone in which the
transmitter of the FM station is located. In general, commercial
FM stations are classified as follows, in order of increasing
power and antenna height: Class A, B1, C3, B, C2, C1, C0,
and C.
The following table sets forth the market, call letters, FCC
license classification, antenna elevation above average terrain
(for FM stations only), power and frequency of all owned
and operated stations as of February 28, 2005, all pending
station acquisitions operated under a LMA as of
February 28, 2005 and all announced pending station
acquisitions not operated as of February 28, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Height | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above | |
|
Power | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
(in Kilowatts) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration | |
|
FCC | |
|
Terrain | |
|
| |
Market |
|
Stations | |
|
City of License | |
|
Frequency | |
|
Date of License | |
|
Class | |
|
(in feet) | |
|
Day | |
|
Night | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Abilene, TX
|
|
|
KCDD FM |
|
|
|
Hamlin, TX |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
|
KBCY FM |
|
|
|
Tye, TX |
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KTLT FM |
|
|
|
Anson, TX |
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
KHXS FM |
|
|
|
Merkel, TX |
|
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
Albany, GA
|
|
|
WNUQ FM |
|
|
|
Albany, GA |
|
|
|
101.7 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
WEGC FM |
|
|
|
Sasser, GA |
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
WALG AM |
|
|
|
Albany, GA |
|
|
|
1590 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WJAD FM |
|
|
|
Leesburg, GA |
|
|
|
103.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
WKAK FM |
|
|
|
Albany, GA |
|
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
|
WGPC AM |
|
|
|
Albany, GA |
|
|
|
1450 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WQVE FM |
|
|
|
Camilla, GA |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
WZBN FM |
|
|
|
Sylvester, GA |
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Amarillo, TX
|
|
|
KZRK FM |
|
|
|
Canyon, TX |
|
|
|
107.9 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KZRK AM |
|
|
|
Canyon, TX |
|
|
|
1550 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
KARX FM |
|
|
|
Claude, TX |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KPUR AM |
|
|
|
Amarillo, TX |
|
|
|
1440 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KPUR FM |
|
|
|
Canyon, TX |
|
|
|
107.1 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
KQIZ FM |
|
|
|
Amarillo, TX |
|
|
|
93.1 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Appleton Oshkosh, WI
|
|
|
WWWX FM |
|
|
|
Oshkosh, WI |
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
WVBO FM |
|
|
|
Winneconne, WI |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
WNAM AM |
|
|
|
Neenah Menasha, WI |
|
|
|
1280 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
WOSH AM |
|
|
|
Oshkosh, WI |
|
|
|
1490 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WPKR FM |
|
|
|
Omro, WI |
|
|
|
99.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Bangor, ME
|
|
|
WQCB FM |
|
|
|
Brewer, ME |
|
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1079 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
|
WBZN FM |
|
|
|
Old Town, ME |
|
|
|
107.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WWMJ FM |
|
|
|
Ellsworth, ME |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
1030 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
WEZQ FM |
|
|
|
Bangor, ME |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDEA AM |
|
|
|
Ellsworth, ME |
|
|
|
1370 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX
|
|
|
KSTB FM |
|
|
|
Crystal Beach, TX |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
KQXY FM |
|
|
|
Beaumont, TX |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
600.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KQHN AM |
|
|
|
Nederland, TX |
|
|
|
1510 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
KIKR AM |
|
|
|
Beaumont, TX |
|
|
|
1450 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KTCX FM |
|
|
|
Beaumont, TX |
|
|
|
102.5 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
KAYD FM |
|
|
|
Silsbee, TX |
|
|
|
101.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Bismarck, ND
|
|
|
KBYZ FM |
|
|
|
Bismarck, ND |
|
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1001 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KACL FM |
|
|
|
Bismarck, ND |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KKCT FM |
|
|
|
Bismarck, ND |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KLXX AM |
|
|
|
Mandan, ND |
|
|
|
1270 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Height | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above | |
|
Power | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
(in Kilowatts) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration | |
|
FCC | |
|
Terrain | |
|
| |
Market |
|
Stations | |
|
City of License | |
|
Frequency | |
|
Date of License | |
|
Class | |
|
(in feet) | |
|
Day | |
|
Night | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Blacksburg, VA
|
|
|
WBWR FM |
|
|
|
Bedford, VA |
|
|
|
106.9 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
1276 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
WBRW FM |
|
|
|
Blacksburg. VA |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
WFNR FM |
|
|
|
Christiansburg, VA |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
WFNR AM |
|
|
|
Blacksburg. VA |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WPSK FM |
|
|
|
Pulaski, VA |
|
|
|
107.1 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
1207 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
WRAD AM |
|
|
|
Radford, VA |
|
|
|
1460 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WWBU FM |
|
|
|
Radford, VA |
|
|
|
101.7 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Bridgeport, CT
|
|
|
WEBE FM |
|
|
|
Westport, CT |
|
|
|
107.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WICC AM |
|
|
|
Bridgeport, CT |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Canton, OH
|
|
|
WRQK FM |
|
|
|
Canton, OH |
|
|
|
106.9 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
Cedar Rapids, IA
|
|
|
KDAT FM |
|
|
|
Cedar Rapids, IA |
|
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KHAK FM |
|
|
|
Cedar Rapids, IA |
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KRNA FM |
|
|
|
Iowa City, IA |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Columbia, MO
|
|
|
KBXR FM |
|
|
|
Columbia, MO |
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
KFRU AM |
|
|
|
Columbia, MO |
|
|
|
1400 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KPLA FM |
|
|
|
Columbia, MO |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
1064 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
|
KOQL FM |
|
|
|
Ashland, MO |
|
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
|
69.0 |
|
Columbus-Starkville, MS
|
|
|
WSSO AM |
|
|
|
Starkville, MS |
|
|
|
1230 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WMXU FM |
|
|
|
Starkville, MS |
|
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
|
WSMS FM |
|
|
|
Artesia, MS |
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
|
WKOR FM |
|
|
|
Columbus, MS |
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WKOR AM |
|
|
|
Starkville, MS |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
WJWF AM |
|
|
|
Columbus, MS |
|
|
|
1400 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WMBC FM |
|
|
|
Columbus, MS |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Danbury, CT
|
|
|
WRKI FM |
|
|
|
Brookfield, CT |
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
|
WDBY FM |
|
|
|
Patterson, NY |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
WINE AM |
|
|
|
Brookfield, CT |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
WPUT AM |
|
|
|
Brewster, NY |
|
|
|
1510 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Dubuque, IA
|
|
|
KLYV FM |
|
|
|
Dubuque, IA |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
KXGE FM |
|
|
|
Dubuque, IA |
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDBQ FM |
|
|
|
Galena, IL |
|
|
|
107.5 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDBQ AM |
|
|
|
Dubuque, IA |
|
|
|
1490 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WJOD FM |
|
|
|
Asbury, IA |
|
|
|
103.3 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Eugene-Springfield, OR
|
|
|
KUJZ FM |
|
|
|
Creswell, OR |
|
|
|
95.3 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
1207 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
KSCR AM |
|
|
|
Eugene, OR |
|
|
|
1320 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
KZEL FM |
|
|
|
Eugene, OR |
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1093 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
|
KUGN AM |
|
|
|
Eugene, OR |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
KEHK FM |
|
|
|
Brownsville, OR |
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
|
KNRQ FM |
|
|
|
Eugene, OR |
|
|
|
97.9 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1011 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
|
Faribault-Owatonna, MN
|
|
|
KRFO AM |
|
|
|
Owatonna, MN |
|
|
|
1390 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
KRFO FM |
|
|
|
Owatonna, MN |
|
|
|
104.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
KDHL AM |
|
|
|
Faribault, MN |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
KQCL FM |
|
|
|
Faribault, MN |
|
|
|
95.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Fayetteville, AR
|
|
|
KFAY FM |
|
|
|
Bentonville, AR |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KQSM AM |
|
|
|
Farmington, AR |
|
|
|
1030 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KKEG FM |
|
|
|
Fayetteville, AR |
|
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
KAMO FM |
|
|
|
Rogers, AR |
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
|
KMCK FM |
|
|
|
Siloam Springs, AR |
|
|
|
105.7 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KZRA AM |
|
|
|
Springdale, AR |
|
|
|
1590 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
KYNF FM |
|
|
|
Prairie Grove, AR |
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Height | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above | |
|
Power | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
(in Kilowatts) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration | |
|
FCC | |
|
Terrain | |
|
| |
Market |
|
Stations | |
|
City of License | |
|
Frequency | |
|
Date of License | |
|
Class | |
|
(in feet) | |
|
Day | |
|
Night | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fayetteville, NC
|
|
|
WRCQ FM |
|
|
|
Dunn, NC |
|
|
|
103.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
|
WFNC FM |
|
|
|
Lumberton, NC |
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
WFNC AM |
|
|
|
Fayetteville, NC |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WQSM FM |
|
|
|
Fayetteville, NC |
|
|
|
98.1 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WKQB FM |
|
|
|
Southern Pines, NC |
|
|
|
106.9 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Flint, MI
|
|
|
WDZZ FM |
|
|
|
Flint, MI |
|
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
WRSR FM |
|
|
|
Owosso, MI |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
WWCK FM |
|
|
|
Flint, MI |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B1 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
WWCK AM |
|
|
|
Flint, MI |
|
|
|
1570 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Florence, SC
|
|
|
WYNN FM |
|
|
|
Florence, SC |
|
|
|
106.3 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
WYNN AM |
|
|
|
Florence, SC |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
WYMB AM |
|
|
|
Manning, SC |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WCMG FM |
|
|
|
Latta, SC |
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
WHSC AM |
|
|
|
Hartsville, SC |
|
|
|
1450 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WBZF FM |
|
|
|
Hartsville, SC |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
WHLZ FM |
|
|
|
Marion, SC |
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
|
WMXT FM |
|
|
|
Pamplico, SC |
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WWFN FM |
|
|
|
Lake City, SC |
|
|
|
100.1 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Fort Smith, AR
|
|
|
KLSZ FM |
|
|
|
Van Buren, AR |
|
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
KOMS FM |
|
|
|
Poteau, OK |
|
|
|
107.3 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1811 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KBBQ FM |
|
|
|
Fort Smith, AR |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
KAYR AM |
|
|
|
Van Buren, AR |
|
|
|
1060 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Fort Walton Beach, FL
|
|
|
WKSM FM |
|
|
|
Fort Walton Beach, FL |
|
|
|
99.5 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WNCV FM |
|
|
|
Niceville, FL |
|
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
WYZB FM |
|
|
|
Mary Esther, FL |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
WZNS FM |
|
|
|
Fort Walton Beach, FL |
|
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WFTW AM |
|
|
|
Fort Walton Beach, FL |
|
|
|
1260 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Grand Junction, CO
|
|
|
KBKL FM |
|
|
|
Grand Junction, CO |
|
|
|
107.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1460 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KEKB FM |
|
|
|
Fruita, CO |
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1542 |
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
|
KMXY FM |
|
|
|
Grand Junction, CO |
|
|
|
104.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1460 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KKNN FM |
|
|
|
Delta, CO |
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1424 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KEXO AM |
|
|
|
Grand Junction, CO |
|
|
|
1230 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Green Bay, WI
|
|
|
WOGB FM |
|
|
|
Kaukauna, WI |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
WJLW FM |
|
|
|
Allouez, WI |
|
|
|
106.7 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDUZ FM |
|
|
|
Brillion, WI |
|
|
|
107.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
WQLH FM |
|
|
|
Green Bay, WI |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WNGB AM |
|
|
|
Green Bay, WI |
|
|
|
1400 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WPCK FM |
|
|
|
Denmark, WI |
|
|
|
104.9 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Harrisburg, PA
|
|
|
WNNK FM |
|
|
|
Harrisburg, PA |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
|
WTPA FM |
|
|
|
Mechanicsburg, PA |
|
|
|
93.5 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
WWKL FM |
|
|
|
Palmyra, PA |
|
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
WTCY AM |
|
|
|
Harrisburg, PA |
|
|
|
1400 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
KIOL FM |
|
|
|
Beaumont, TX |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KVST FM |
|
|
|
Willis, TX |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Huntsville, AL
|
|
|
WZYP FM |
|
|
|
Athens, AL |
|
|
|
104.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WHRP FM |
|
|
|
Tullahoma, TN |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WVNN AM |
|
|
|
Athens, AL |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
WUMP AM |
|
|
|
Madison, AL |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Height | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above | |
|
Power | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
(in Kilowatts) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration | |
|
FCC | |
|
Terrain | |
|
| |
Market |
|
Stations | |
|
City of License | |
|
Frequency | |
|
Date of License | |
|
Class | |
|
(in feet) | |
|
Day | |
|
Night | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Jefferson City, MO
|
|
|
KBBM FM |
|
|
|
Jefferson City, MO |
|
|
|
100.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
|
KJMO FM |
|
|
|
Jefferson City, MO |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
KLIK AM |
|
|
|
Jefferson City, MO |
|
|
|
1240 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Kalamazoo, MI
|
|
|
WKFR FM |
|
|
|
Battle Creek, MI |
|
|
|
103.3 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WRKR FM |
|
|
|
Portage, MI |
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WKMI AM |
|
|
|
Kalamazoo, MI |
|
|
|
1360 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Kansas City, MO
|
|
|
KCHZ FM |
|
|
|
Ottawa, KS |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
|
KMJK FM |
|
|
|
Lexington, MO |
|
|
|
107.3 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1,184 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KRWP FM |
|
|
|
Stockton, MO |
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
Killeen-Temple, TX
|
|
|
KLTD FM |
|
|
|
Temple, TX |
|
|
|
101.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
KQXB FM |
|
|
|
Belton, TX |
|
|
|
106.3 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
KSSM FM |
|
|
|
Copperas Cove, TX |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
KUSJ FM |
|
|
|
Harker Heights, TX |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
|
KTEM AM |
|
|
|
Temple, TX |
|
|
|
1400 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Lake Charles, LA
|
|
|
KKGB FM |
|
|
|
Sulphur, LA |
|
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
|
KBIU FM |
|
|
|
Lake Charles, LA |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KYKZ FM |
|
|
|
Lake Charles, LA |
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KXZZ AM |
|
|
|
Lake Charles, LA |
|
|
|
1580 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KQLK FM |
|
|
|
DeRidder, LA |
|
|
|
97.9 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
KAOK AM |
|
|
|
Lake Charles, LA |
|
|
|
1400 |
|
|
|
June, 1 2012 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Lexington, KY
|
|
|
WVLK AM |
|
|
|
Lexington, KY |
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WLXX FM |
|
|
|
Lexington, KY |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WLTO FM |
|
|
|
Nicholasville, KY |
|
|
|
102.5 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
WLRO FM |
|
|
|
Richmond, KY |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
WXZZ FM |
|
|
|
Georgetown, KY |
|
|
|
103.3 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
WCYN-FM |
|
|
|
Cynthiana, KY |
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Macon, GA
|
|
|
WPEZ FM |
|
|
|
Jeffersonville, GA |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDDO AM |
|
|
|
Macon, GA |
|
|
|
1240 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDEN AM |
|
|
|
Macon, GA |
|
|
|
1500 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDEN FM |
|
|
|
Macon, GA |
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WAYS FM |
|
|
|
Macon, GA |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
WMAC AM |
|
|
|
Macon, GA |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
WMKS FM |
|
|
|
Macon, GA |
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
WMGB FM |
|
|
|
Montezuma, GA |
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
46.0 |
|
Melbourne-Titus-Cocoa, FL
|
|
|
WHKR FM |
|
|
|
Rockledge, FL |
|
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WAOA FM |
|
|
|
Melbourne, FL |
|
|
|
107.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WINT AM |
|
|
|
Melbourne, FL |
|
|
|
1560 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
WSJZ FM |
|
|
|
Sebastian, FL |
|
|
|
95.9 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
25.0 |
|
Mobile, AL
|
|
|
WYOK FM |
|
|
|
Atmore, AL |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1555 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WGOK AM |
|
|
|
Mobile, AL |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
WBLX FM |
|
|
|
Mobile, AL |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1555 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDLT FM |
|
|
|
Chickasaw, AL |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
548 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDLT AM |
|
|
|
Fairhope, AL |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
WAVH FM |
|
|
|
Daphne, AL |
|
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Monroe, MI
|
|
|
WTWR FM |
|
|
|
Luna Pier, MI |
|
|
|
98.3 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Height | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above | |
|
Power | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
(in Kilowatts) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration | |
|
FCC | |
|
Terrain | |
|
| |
Market |
|
Stations | |
|
City of License | |
|
Frequency | |
|
Date of License | |
|
Class | |
|
(in feet) | |
|
Day | |
|
Night | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Montgomery, AL
|
|
|
WMSP AM |
|
|
|
Montgomery, AL |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
WNZZ AM |
|
|
|
Montgomery, AL |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
WMXS FM |
|
|
|
Montgomery, AL |
|
|
|
103.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1096 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WLWI FM |
|
|
|
Montgomery, AL |
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1096 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WHHY FM |
|
|
|
Montgomery, AL |
|
|
|
101.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C0 |
|
|
|
1096 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WLWI AM |
|
|
|
Montgomery, AL |
|
|
|
1440 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WXFX FM |
|
|
|
Prattville, AL |
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Myrtle Beach, SC
|
|
|
WSYN FM |
|
|
|
Georgetown, SC |
|
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WDAI FM |
|
|
|
Pawleys Island, SC |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
WJXY FM |
|
|
|
Conway, SC |
|
|
|
93.9 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
WXJY FM |
|
|
|
Georgetown, SC |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
WIQB AM |
|
|
|
Conway, SC |
|
|
|
1050 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
WSEA FM |
|
|
|
Atlantic Beach, SC |
|
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
|
WYAK FM |
|
|
|
Surfside Beach, SC |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Nashville, TN
|
|
|
WQQK FM |
|
|
|
Hendersonville, TN |
|
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
WNFN FM |
|
|
|
Belle Meade, TN |
|
|
|
106.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
WRQQ FM |
|
|
|
Goodlettsville, TN |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
|
WSM FM |
|
|
|
Nashville, TN |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WWTN FM |
|
|
|
Manchester, TN |
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Newburgh-Middletown, NY
|
|
|
WALL AM |
|
|
|
Middletown, NY |
|
|
|
1340 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
WRRV FM |
|
|
|
Middletown, NY |
|
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Odessa-Midland, TX
|
|
|
KBAT FM |
|
|
|
Midland, TX |
|
|
|
93.3 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KODM FM |
|
|
|
Odessa, TX |
|
|
|
97.9 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KNFM FM |
|
|
|
Midland, TX |
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KGEE FM |
|
|
|
Monahans, TX |
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
|
KMND AM |
|
|
|
Midland, TX |
|
|
|
1510 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
KRIL AM |
|
|
|
Odessa, TX |
|
|
|
1410 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KKLY FM |
|
|
|
Pecos, TX |
|
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Oxnard-Ventura, CA
|
|
|
KVEN AM |
|
|
|
Ventura, CA |
|
|
|
1450 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KHAY FM |
|
|
|
Ventura, CA |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
1211 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
|
KBBY FM |
|
|
|
Ventura, CA |
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Pensacola, FL
|
|
|
WJLQ FM |
|
|
|
Pensacola, FL |
|
|
|
100.7 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1555 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WCOA AM |
|
|
|
Pensacola, FL |
|
|
|
1370 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
WRRX FM |
|
|
|
Gulf Breeze, FL |
|
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Poughkeepsie, NY
|
|
|
WPDH FM |
|
|
|
Poughkeepsie, NY |
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
1540 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
WPDA FM |
|
|
|
Jeffersonville, NY |
|
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
WRRB FM |
|
|
|
Arlington, NY |
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
1007 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
WZAD FM |
|
|
|
Wurtsboro, NY |
|
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
WCZX FM |
|
|
|
Hyde Park, NY |
|
|
|
97.7 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
1030 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
WEOK AM |
|
|
|
Poughkeepsie, NY |
|
|
|
1390 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
WKNY AM |
|
|
|
Kingston, NY |
|
|
|
1490 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WKXP FM |
|
|
|
Kingston, NY |
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Quad Cities, IA
|
|
|
KQCS FM |
|
|
|
Bettendorf, IA |
|
|
|
93.5 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
KBEA FM |
|
|
|
Muscatine, IA |
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KBOB FM |
|
|
|
DeWitt, IA |
|
|
|
104.9 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
KJOC AM |
|
|
|
Davenport, IA |
|
|
|
1170 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WXLP FM |
|
|
|
Moline, IL |
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Height | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above | |
|
Power | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
(in Kilowatts) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration | |
|
FCC | |
|
Terrain | |
|
| |
Market |
|
Stations | |
|
City of License | |
|
Frequency | |
|
Date of License | |
|
Class | |
|
(in feet) | |
|
Day | |
|
Night | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Rochester, MN
|
|
|
KROC AM |
|
|
|
Rochester, MN |
|
|
|
1340 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KROC FM |
|
|
|
Rochester, MN |
|
|
|
106.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C0 |
|
|
|
1149 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KYBA FM |
|
|
|
Stewartville, MN |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
KFIL FM |
|
|
|
Preston, MN |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
KFIL AM |
|
|
|
Preston, MN |
|
|
|
1060 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KVGO FM |
|
|
|
Spring Valley, MN |
|
|
|
104.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
KOLM AM |
|
|
|
Rochester, MN |
|
|
|
1520 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
KWWK FM |
|
|
|
Rochester, MN |
|
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
|
KLCX FM |
|
|
|
Saint Charles, MN |
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Rockford, IL
|
|
|
WROK AM |
|
|
|
Rockford, IL |
|
|
|
1440 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
WZOK FM |
|
|
|
Rockford, IL |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WXXQ FM |
|
|
|
Freeport, IL |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B1 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
WKGL FM |
|
|
|
Loves Park, IL |
|
|
|
96.7 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
551 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Santa Barbara, CA
|
|
|
KMGQ FM |
|
|
|
Santa Barbara, CA |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
2920 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
|
KKSB FM |
|
|
|
Goleta, CA |
|
|
|
106.3 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
KRUZ FM |
|
|
|
Santa Barbara, CA |
|
|
|
103.3 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
2916 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
Savannah, GA
|
|
|
WJCL FM |
|
|
|
Savannah, GA |
|
|
|
96.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
|
WIXV FM |
|
|
|
Savannah, GA |
|
|
|
95.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WTYB FM |
|
|
|
Springfield, GA |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
WBMQ AM |
|
|
|
Savannah, GA |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
WEAS FM |
|
|
|
Savannah, GA |
|
|
|
93.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
97.0 |
|
|
|
97.0 |
|
|
|
|
WJLG AM |
|
|
|
Savannah, GA |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
WZAT FM |
|
|
|
Savannah, GA |
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1322 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
Shreveport, LA
|
|
|
KMJJ FM |
|
|
|
Shreveport, LA |
|
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
KRMD FM |
|
|
|
Shreveport, LA |
|
|
|
101.1 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1119 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
98.0 |
|
|
|
|
KRMD AM |
|
|
|
Shreveport, LA |
|
|
|
1340 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KBED FM |
|
|
|
Shreveport, LA |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
|
KVMA FM |
|
|
|
Magnolia, AR |
|
|
|
107.9 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Sioux Falls, SD
|
|
|
KYBB FM |
|
|
|
Canton, SD |
|
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
KIKN FM |
|
|
|
Salem, SD |
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KKLS FM |
|
|
|
Sioux Falls, SD |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KMXC FM |
|
|
|
Sioux Falls, SD |
|
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KSOO AM |
|
|
|
Sioux Falls, SD |
|
|
|
1140 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
KXRB AM |
|
|
|
Sioux Falls, SD |
|
|
|
1000 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Tallahassee, FL
|
|
|
WHBX FM |
|
|
|
Tallahassee, FL |
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
|
WBZE FM |
|
|
|
Tallahassee, FL |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WHBT AM |
|
|
|
Tallahassee, FL |
|
|
|
1410 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
WGLF FM |
|
|
|
Tallahassee, FL |
|
|
|
104.1 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1394 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
|
WWLD FM |
|
|
|
Cairo, GA |
|
|
|
102.3 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
Toledo, OH
|
|
|
WKKO FM |
|
|
|
Toledo, OH |
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
WRQN FM |
|
|
|
Bowling Green, OH |
|
|
|
93.5 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
WTOD AM |
|
|
|
Toledo, OH |
|
|
|
1560 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
WWWM FM |
|
|
|
Sylvania, OH |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
WLQR AM |
|
|
|
Toledo, OH |
|
|
|
1470 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WXKR FM |
|
|
|
Port Clinton, OH |
|
|
|
94.5 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
WRWK FM |
|
|
|
Delta, OH |
|
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Height | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Above | |
|
Power | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
(in Kilowatts) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration | |
|
FCC | |
|
Terrain | |
|
| |
Market |
|
Stations | |
|
City of License | |
|
Frequency | |
|
Date of License | |
|
Class | |
|
(in feet) | |
|
Day | |
|
Night | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Topeka, KS
|
|
|
KDVV FM |
|
|
|
Topeka, KS |
|
|
|
100.3 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KMAJ FM |
|
|
|
Topeka, KS |
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KMAJ AM |
|
|
|
Topeka, KS |
|
|
|
1440 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KTOP AM |
|
|
|
Topeka, KS |
|
|
|
1490 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
KQTP FM |
|
|
|
St. Marys, KS |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
KWIC FM |
|
|
|
Topeka, KS |
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA
|
|
|
KOEL FM |
|
|
|
Cedar Falls, IA |
|
|
|
98.5 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
|
KKHQ FM |
|
|
|
Oelwein, IA |
|
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1968 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KOEL AM |
|
|
|
Oelwein, IA |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
KCRR FM |
|
|
|
Grundy Center, IA |
|
|
|
97.7 |
|
|
|
February 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C3 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Westchester County, NY
|
|
|
WFAS AM |
|
|
|
White Plains, NY |
|
|
|
1230 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WFAS FM |
|
|
|
White Plains, NY |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
WFAF FM |
|
|
|
Mount Kisco, NY |
|
|
|
106.3 |
|
|
|
June 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Wichita Falls, TX
|
|
|
KLUR FM |
|
|
|
Wichita Falls, TX |
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KQXC FM |
|
|
|
Wichita Falls, TX |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
KYYI FM |
|
|
|
Burkburnett, TX |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
1017 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
KOLI FM |
|
|
|
Electra, TX |
|
|
|
94.9 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Wilmington, NC
|
|
|
WWQQ FM |
|
|
|
Wilmington, NC |
|
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C2 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
|
WGNI FM |
|
|
|
Wilmington, NC |
|
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WMNX FM |
|
|
|
Wilmington, NC |
|
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
C1 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
WKXS FM |
|
|
|
Leland, NC |
|
|
|
94.1 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
WAAV AM |
|
|
|
Leland, NC |
|
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
December 1, 2011 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Youngstown, OH
|
|
|
WBBW AM |
|
|
|
Youngstown, OH |
|
|
|
1240 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
WPIC AM |
|
|
|
Sharon, PA |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
WYFM FM |
|
|
|
Sharon, PA |
|
|
|
102.9 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
|
|
WHOT FM |
|
|
|
Youngstown, PA |
|
|
|
101.1 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
|
WLLF FM |
|
|
|
Mercer, PA |
|
|
|
96.7 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
WWIZ FM |
|
|
|
Mercer, PA |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
August 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
WQXK FM |
|
|
|
Salem, OH |
|
|
|
105.1 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
|
WSOM AM |
|
|
|
Salem, OH |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2004 |
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
N.A. |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
We also own and operate five radio stations in various locations
throughout the English-speaking Eastern Caribbean, including
Trinidad, St. Kitts-Nevis, St. Lucia, Montserrat and
Antigua-Barbuda, and we have been granted licenses for FM
stations covering Barbados and Tortola, British Virgin Islands.
These Eastern Caribbean stations are not regulated by the FCC.
Regulatory Approvals. The Communications Laws prohibit
the assignment of a broadcast license or the transfer of control
of a broadcast license without the prior approval of the FCC. In
determining whether to grant an application for assignment or
transfer of control of a broadcast license, the Communications
Act requires the FCC to find that the assignment or transfer
would serve the public interest. The FCC considers a number of
factors in making this determination, including
(i) compliance with various rules limiting common ownership
of media properties, (ii) the financial and
character qualifications of the assignee or
transferee (including those parties holding an
attributable interest in the assignee or
transferee), (iii) compliance with the Communications
Acts foreign ownership restrictions, and
(iv) compliance with other Communications Laws, including
those related to programming and filing requirements.
As discussed in greater detail below, the FCC also reviews the
effect of proposed assignments and transfers of broadcast
licenses on economic competition and diversity. See
Antitrust and Market Concentration
Considerations.
17
Four of our acquisition transactions that are pending at the FCC
have been challenged by third parties. In one transaction, an
application is pending before the FCC with respect to our
proposed sale of an AM station in Muskegon, Michigan. The FCC
staff has raised a question concerning a prior owners
proposed retention of a related authorization for that station,
and the prior owner, in turn, has raised questions about our
conduct in acquiring the station. That same owner also filed
objections to our acquisition of a radio station in the
Melbourne, Florida market and another station in the Beaumont,
Texas market after the FCC staff had approved our acquisitions
of those stations. We consummated the acquisition of the
Melbourne station but, for reasons unrelated to the objection at
the FCC, have not yet consummated the acquisition of the
Beaumont station (although we are operating that latter station
under an LMA). The fourth transaction involves a petition to
deny filed against our acquisition of radio stations in the
Columbus-Starkville, Mississippi market. The FCC staff denied
the petition and we consummated the particular transaction. That
decision was subsequently affirmed by the FCC on appeal.
However, the petitioner filed a reconsideration petition with
the FCC and, as a result, the matter is still subject to further
review by the FCC or a court.
We cannot predict the final outcome of the foregoing matters but
does not believe that any adverse decision in any one or more of
the cases will have a material adverse impact on our overall
operations taken as a whole.
Ownership Matters. The Communications Act restricts us
from having more than one-fourth of our capital stock owned or
voted by non-U.S. persons, foreign governments or
non-U.S. corporations. We are required to take appropriate
steps to monitor the citizenship of our stockholders, such as
through representative samplings on a periodic basis, to provide
a reasonable basis for certifying compliance with the foreign
ownership restrictions of the Communications Act.
The Communications Laws also generally restrict (i) the
number of radio stations one person or entity may own, operate
or control in a local market, (ii) the common ownership,
operation or control of radio broadcast stations and television
broadcast stations serving the same local market, and
(iii) the common ownership, operation or control of a radio
broadcast station and a daily newspaper serving the same local
market.
None of these multiple and cross ownership rules requires any
change in our current ownership of radio broadcast stations or
precludes consummation of our pending acquisitions. The
Communications Laws will limit the number of additional stations
that we may acquire in the future in our existing markets as
well as new markets.
Because of these multiple and cross ownership rules, a purchaser
of our voting stock who acquires an attributable
interest in us (as discussed below) may violate the
Communications Laws if such purchaser also has an attributable
interest in other radio or television stations, or in daily
newspapers, depending on the number and location of those radio
or television stations or daily newspapers. Such a purchaser
also may be restricted in the companies in which it may invest
to the extent that those investments give rise to an
attributable interest. If one of our attributable stockholders
violates any of these ownership rules, we may be unable to
obtain from the FCC one or more authorizations needed to conduct
our radio station business and may be unable to obtain FCC
consents for certain future acquisitions.
The FCC generally applies its television/ radio/ newspaper
cross-ownership rules and its broadcast multiple ownership rules
by considering the attributable or cognizable,
interests held by a person or entity. With some exceptions, a
person or entity will be deemed to hold an attributable interest
in a radio station, television station or daily newspaper if the
person or entity serves as an officer, director, partner,
stockholder, member, or, in certain cases, a debt holder of a
company that owns that station or newspaper. Whether that
interest is attributable and thus subject to the FCCs
multiple ownership rules is determined by the FCCs
attribution rules. If an interest is attributable, the FCC
treats the person or entity who holds that interest as the
owner of the radio station, television station or
daily newspaper in question, and that interest thus counts
against the person in determining compliance with the FCCs
ownership rules.
18
With respect to a corporation, officers, directors and persons
or entities that directly or indirectly hold 5% or more of the
corporations voting stock (20% or more of such stock in
the case of insurance companies, investment companies, bank
trust departments and certain other passive
investors that hold such stock for investment purposes
only) generally are attributed with ownership of the radio
stations, television stations and daily newspapers owned by the
corporation. As discussed below, participation in an LMA or a
JSA also may result in an attributable interest. See
Local Marketing Agreements and
Joint Sales Agreements.
With respect to a partnership (or limited liability company),
the interest of a general partner is attributable, as is the
interest of any limited partner (or limited liability company
member) who is materially involved in the
media-related activities of the partnership (or limited
liability company). The following interests generally are not
attributable: (i) debt instruments, non-voting stock,
options and warrants for voting stock, partnership interests, or
membership interests that have not yet been exercised;
(ii) limited partnership or limited liability company
interests where (a) the limited partner or member is not
materially involved in the media-related activities
of the partnership or limited liability company, and
(b) the limited partnership agreement or limited liability
company agreement expressly insulates the limited
partner or member from such material involvement by inclusion of
provisions specified by the FCC; and (iii) holders of less
than 5% of an entitys voting stock. Non-voting equity and
debt interests which, in the aggregate, constitute more than 33%
of a stations enterprise value, which consists
of the total equity and debt capitalization, are considered
attributable in certain circumstances.
We hold a note from a radio station in the Toledo, Ohio radio
market that may constitute an attributable ownership interest
(because we own other radio stations in the Toledo market and
the note may represent more than 33% of the debtor radio
stations enterprise value). Attribution of that radio
station could exceed the ownership limits of FCC rules and, for
that reason, we have been engaged in negotiations to assign the
debt to another party. In the meantime, we have requested a
waiver from the FCC, to the extent necessary, to allow us to
retain the note until it can be assigned.
On June 2, 2003, the FCC adopted new rules and policies
(the New Rules) which would modify the ownership
rules and policies then in effect (the Current
Rules). Among other changes, the New Rules would
(1) change the methodology to determine the boundaries of
radio markets, (2) require that JSAs involving radio
stations (but not television stations) be deemed to be an
attributable ownership interest under certain circumstances,
(3) authorize the common ownership of radio stations and
daily newspapers under certain specified circumstances, and
(4) eliminate the procedural policy of flagging
assignment or transfer of control applications that raised
potential anticompetitive concerns (namely, those applications
that would permit the buyer to control 50% or more of the radio
advertising dollars in the market, or would permit two entities
(including the buyer), collectively, to control 70% or more of
the radio advertising dollars in the market). Certain private
parties challenged the New Rules in court, and the court issued
an order which prevented the New Rules from going into effect
until the court issued a decision on the challenges. On
June 24, 2004, the court issued a decision which upheld
some of the FCCs New Rules (for the most part, those that
relate to radio) and concluded that other New Rules (for the
most part, those that relate to television and newspapers)
required further explanation or modification. The court left in
place, however, the order which precluded all of the New Rules
from going into effect. On September 3, 2004, the court
issued a further order which granted the FCCs request to
allow certain New Rules relating to radio to go into effect. The
New Rules that became effective (1) changed the definition
of the radio market for those markets that are rated
by Arbitron, (2) modified the Current Rules method for
defining a radio market in those markets that are not rated by
Arbitron, and (3) made JSAs an attributable ownership
interest under certain circumstances.
Programming and Operation. The Communications Act
requires broadcasters to serve the public interest.
Broadcasters are required to present programming that is
responsive to community problems, needs and interests and to
maintain certain records demonstrating such responsiveness.
Complaints from listeners concerning a stations
programming may be filed at any time and will be considered by
the FCC both at the time they are filed and in connection with a
licensees renewal application. Stations also must follow
various FCC rules that regulate, among other things, political
advertising, the broadcast of obscene
19
or indecent programming, sponsorship identification, the
broadcast of contests and lotteries, and technical operations
(including limits on radio frequency radiation). Failure to
observe these or other rules and policies can result in the
imposition of various sanctions, including monetary forfeitures,
the grant of a short-term (less than the maximum
term) license renewal or, for particularly egregious violations,
the denial of a license renewal application or the revocation of
a station license.
Local Marketing Agreements. A number of radio stations,
including certain of our stations, have entered into LMAs. In a
typical LMA, the licensee of a station makes available, for a
fee, airtime on its station to a party which supplies
programming to be broadcast during that airtime, and collects
revenues from advertising aired during such programming. LMAs
are subject to compliance with the antitrust laws and the
Communications Laws, including the requirement that the licensee
must maintain independent control over the station and, in
particular, its personnel, programming, and finances. The FCC
has held that such agreements do not violate the Communications
Laws as long as the licensee of the station receiving
programming from another station maintains ultimate
responsibility for, and control over, station operations and
otherwise ensures compliance with the Communications Laws.
A station that brokers more than 15% of the weekly programming
hours on another station in its market will be considered to
have an attributable ownership interest in the brokered station
for purposes of the FCCs ownership rules. As a result, a
radio station may not enter into an LMA that allows it to
program more than 15% of the weekly programming hours of another
station in the same market that it could not own under the
FCCs multiple ownership rules.
Joint Sales Agreements. A number of radio stations,
including one of our stations, have entered into JSAs. A typical
JSA authorizes one station to sell another stations
advertising time and retain the revenue from the sale of that
airtime. A JSA typically includes a periodic payment to the
station whose airtime is being sold (which may include a share
of the revenue being collected from the sale of airtime). Like
LMAs, JSAs are subject to compliance with antitrust laws and the
Communications Laws, including the requirement that the licensee
must maintain independent control over the station and, in
particular, its personnel, programming, and finances. The FCC
has held that such agreements do not violate the Communications
Laws as long as the licensee of the station whose time is being
sold by another station maintains ultimate responsibility for,
and control over, station operations and otherwise ensures
compliance with the Communications Laws.
Under the FCCs New Rules, a radio station that sells more
than 15% of the weekly advertising time of another radio station
in the same market will be attributed with the ownership of that
other station. In that situation, a radio station cannot have a
JSA with another radio station in the same market if the
FCCs ownership rules would otherwise prohibit that common
ownership.
New Services. In 1997, the FCC awarded two licenses to
separate entities that authorize the licensees to provide
satellite-delivered digital audio radio services. Both licensees
have launched their respective satellite-delivered digital radio
service.
Digital technology also may be used by terrestrial radio
broadcast stations on their existing frequencies. In October
2002, the FCC released a Report and Order in which it selected
in-band, on channel (IBOC) as the technology that
will permit terrestrial radio stations to introduce digital
operations. The FCC now will permit operating radio stations to
commence digital operation immediately on an interim basis using
the IBOC systems developed by iBiquity Digital Corporation
(iBiquity). In March 2004, the FCC (1) approved
an FM radio stations use of two separate antennas (as
opposed to a single hybrid antenna) to provide both analog and
digital signals and (2) released a Public Notice seeking
comment on a proposal by the National Association of
Broadcasters to allow all AM stations with nighttime
service to provide digital service at night. In April 2004, the
FCC inaugurated a rule making proceeding to establish technical,
service, and licensing rules for digital broadcasting. The
inauguration of digital broadcasts by FM and perhaps AM stations
requires us to make additional expenditures. On
December 21, 2004, we entered into an agreement with
iBiquity pursuant to which we committed to roll out the IBOC
systems on 240 of our stations by June, 2012. In exchange for
reduced license fees and other consideration, we, along with
other broadcasters, purchased perpetual licenses to utilize
iBiquitys
20
digital technology. We are presently working with equipment
manufacturers to roll out such technology within our markets in
accordance with our contractual commitments. We cannot predict
at this juncture, however, how successful our implementation of
digital technology within our platform will be, or how that
implementation will affect our competitive position.
In January 2000, the FCC released a Report and Order adopting
rules for a new low power FM radio service consisting of
two classes of stations, one with a maximum power of
100 watts and the other with a maximum power of
10 watts. The FCC has limited ownership and operation of
low power FM stations to persons and entities which do not
currently have an attributable interest in any FM station
and has required that low power FM stations be operated on
a non-commercial educational basis. The FCC has granted numerous
construction permits for low power FM stations. We cannot
predict what impact low power FM radio will have on our
operations. Adverse effects of the new low power FM service
on our operations could include interference with our stations
and competition by low power stations for listeners and revenues.
In addition, from time to time Congress and the FCC have
considered, and may in the future consider and adopt, new laws,
regulations and policies regarding a wide variety of matters
that could, directly or indirectly, affect the operation,
ownership and profitability of our radio stations, result in the
loss of audience share and advertising revenues for our radio
stations, and affect the ability of Cumulus to acquire
additional radio stations or finance such acquisitions.
Antitrust and Market Concentration Considerations.
Potential future acquisitions, to the extent they meet specified
size thresholds, will be subject to applicable waiting periods
and possible review under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (HSR Act), by
the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission,
either of whom can be required to evaluate a transaction to
determine whether that transaction should be challenged under
the federal antitrust laws. Transactions are subject to the HSR
Act only if the acquisition price or fair market value of the
stations to be acquired is $50 million or more. Most of our
acquisitions have not met this threshold. Acquisitions that are
not required to be reported under the HSR Act may still be
investigated by the Department of Justice or the Federal Trade
Commission under the antitrust laws before or after
consummation. At any time before or after the consummation of a
proposed acquisition, the Department of Justice or the Federal
Trade Commission could take such action under the antitrust laws
as it deems necessary, including seeking to enjoin the
acquisition or seeking divestiture of the business acquired or
certain of our other assets. The Department of Justice has
reviewed numerous radio station acquisitions where an operator
proposes to acquire additional stations in its existing markets
or multiple stations in new markets, and has challenged a number
of such transactions. Some of these challenges have resulted in
consent decrees requiring the sale of certain stations, the
termination of LMAs or other relief. In general, the Department
of Justice has more closely scrutinized radio mergers and
acquisitions resulting in local market shares in excess of 35%
of local radio advertising revenues, depending on format, signal
strength and other factors. There is no precise numerical rule,
however, and certain transactions resulting in more than 35%
revenue shares have not been challenged, while certain other
transactions may be challenged based on other criteria such as
audience shares in one or more demographic groups as well as the
percentage of revenue share. We estimate that we have more than
a 35% share of radio advertising revenues in many of our markets.
We are aware that the Department of Justice commenced, and
subsequently discontinued, investigations of several proposed
acquisitions by Cumulus. The Department of Justice can be
expected to continue to enforce the antitrust laws in this
manner, and there can be no assurance that one or more of our
pending or future acquisitions are not or will not be the
subject of an investigation or enforcement action by the
Department of Justice or the Federal Trade Commission.
Similarly, there can be no assurance that the Department of
Justice, the Federal Trade Commission or the FCC will not
prohibit such acquisitions, require that they be restructured,
or in appropriate cases, require that we divest stations we
already own in a particular market. In addition, private parties
may under certain circumstances bring legal action to challenge
an acquisition under the antitrust laws.
21
As part of its review of certain radio station acquisitions, the
Department of Justice has stated publicly that it believes that
commencement of operations under LMAs, JSAs and other similar
agreements customarily entered into in connection with radio
station ownership transfers prior to the expiration of the
waiting period under the HSR Act could violate the HSR Act. In
connection with acquisitions subject to the waiting period under
the HSR Act, we will not commence operation of any affected
station to be acquired under an LMA, a JSA, or similar agreement
until the waiting period has expired or been terminated.
Executive Officers of the Company
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our executive officers as of February 28, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position(s) |
|
|
| |
|
|
Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
John G. Pinch
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer |
Martin R. Gausvik
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
John W. Dickey
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. has served as our Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer since December 2000, and
as a Director since March 1998. Mr. Dickey was one of our
founders and initial investors, and served as our Executive Vice
Chairman from March 1998 to December 2000. Mr. Dickey is a
nationally regarded consultant on radio strategy and the author
of The Franchise Building Radio Brands,
published by the National Association of Broadcasters, one
of the industrys leading texts on competition and
strategy. Mr. Dickey also serves as a member of the
National Association of Broadcasters Radio Board of Directors.
He holds Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts degrees from
Stanford University and a Master of Business Administration
degree from Harvard University. Mr. Dickey is the brother
of John W. Dickey.
John G. Pinch has served as our Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer since December 2000. Mr. Pinch
joined us effective December 1, 2000, after serving as the
President of Clear Channel International Radio (CCU
International) (NYSE:CCU). At rapidly growing CCU
International, Mr. Pinch was responsible for the management
of all CCU radio operations outside of the United States, which
included over 300 properties in 9 countries.
Mr. Pinch is a 30 year broadcast veteran and has
previously served as Owner/ President of WTVK-TV
Ft. Myers-Naples Florida, General Manager of WMTX-FM/
WHBO-AM Tampa Florida, General Manager/ Owner of WKLH-FM
Milwaukee, and General Manager of WXJY Milwaukee.
Martin R. Gausvik is our Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Gausvik joined us
effective May 29, 2000 and is a 19-year veteran of the
radio industry, having served as Vice President Finance for
Jacor Communications from 1996 until the merger of Jacors
250 radio station group with Clear Channel Communications
in May 1999. More recently, he was Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Latin Communications Group, the
operator of 17 radio stations serving major markets in the
western United States. Prior to joining Jacor, from 1984 to
1996, Mr. Gausvik held various accounting and financial
positions with Taft Broadcasting, including Controller of
Tafts successor company, Citicasters.
John W. Dickey is our Executive Vice President and
directs our programming, marketing, promotion and engineering.
Mr. Dickey joined us in 1998 and, prior to that, served as
the Director of Programming for Midwestern Broadcasting from
1990 to 1998. Mr. Dickey holds a Bachelor of Arts degree
from Stanford University. Mr. Dickey is the brother of
Lewis W. Dickey, Jr.
22
Available Information
Our Internet site address is www.cumulus.com. On our
site, we have made available, free of charge, our most recent
annual report on Form 10-K and our proxy statement. We also
provide a link to an independent third-party Internet site,
which makes available, free of charge, our other filings with
the SEC, as soon as reasonably practicable after we
electronically file such material with, or furnish it to,
the SEC.
The types of properties required to support each of our radio
stations include offices, studios, transmitter sites and antenna
sites. A stations studios are generally housed with its
offices in business districts of the stations community of
license or largest nearby community. The transmitter sites and
antenna sites are generally located so as to provide maximum
market coverage.
At December 31, 2004, we owned studio facilities in 39 of
our 59 markets and we owned transmitter and antenna sites
in 55 of our 59 markets. We lease additional studio and
office facilities in 39 markets and additional transmitter
and antenna sites in 39 markets. In addition, we lease
corporate office space in Atlanta, Georgia. We do not anticipate
any difficulties in renewing any facility leases or in leasing
alternative or additional space, if required. We own or lease
substantially all of our other equipment, consisting principally
of transmitting antennae, transmitters, studio equipment and
general office equipment.
No single property is material to our operations. We believe
that our properties are generally in good condition and suitable
for our operations; however, we continually look for
opportunities to upgrade our properties and intend to upgrade
studios, office space and transmission facilities in certain
markets.
|
|
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
We from time to time are involved in various legal proceedings
that are handled and defended in the ordinary course of
business. While we are unable to predict the outcome of these
matters, our management does not believe, based upon currently
available facts, that the ultimate resolution of any of such
proceedings would have a material adverse effect on our overall
financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters To a Vote of Security Holders |
During the fourth quarter, October 1, 2004 through
December 31, 2004, there were no matters submitted to a
vote of security holders.
23
PART II
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities |
Market Information For Common Stock
Shares of our Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share (the Class A Common Stock), have been
quoted on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol CMLS since
the consummation of the initial public offering of our
Class A Common Stock on July 1, 1998. There is no
established public trading market for our Class B Common
Stock or our Class C Common Stock. The following table sets
forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low
closing sales prices of the Class A Common Stock on the
NASDAQ National Market, as reported in published financial
sources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
17.41 |
|
|
$ |
12.80 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$ |
19.75 |
|
|
$ |
15.05 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$ |
19.55 |
|
|
$ |
16.01 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$ |
22.12 |
|
|
$ |
17.80 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
22.70 |
|
|
$ |
19.37 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$ |
22.28 |
|
|
$ |
16.02 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$ |
16.59 |
|
|
$ |
13.37 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$ |
16.36 |
|
|
$ |
13.58 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through February 28, 2005)
|
|
$ |
15.00 |
|
|
$ |
13.63 |
|
Holders
As of February 28, 2005, there were approximately
1,310 holders of record of our Class A Common Stock,
2 holders of record for our Class B Common Stock and
1 holder of record for our Class C Common Stock. The
figure for our Class A Common Stock does not include an
estimate of the number of beneficial holders whose shares may be
held of record by brokerage firms or clearing agencies.
Dividends
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common
stock since our inception and do not currently anticipate paying
any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable
future. We intend to retain future earnings for use in our
business. We are currently subject to restrictions under the
terms of our credit agreement, as amended (the Credit
Agreement), governing our credit facility (the
Credit Facility) that limit the amount of cash
dividends that we may pay on our Class A Common Stock. We
may pay cash dividends on our Class A Common Stock in the
future only if we meet certain financial tests set forth in the
Credit Agreement.
24
Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Incentive
Plans
The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2004,
the number of securities outstanding under our equity
compensation plans, the weighted average exercise price of such
securities and the number of securities available for grant
under these plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
Number of Shares to | |
|
|
|
Remaining Available | |
|
|
be Issued Upon | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
for Future Issuance | |
|
|
Exercise of Outstanding | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Under Equity | |
|
|
Options, Warrants and | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Compensation Plans | |
Plan Category |
|
Rights | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
(Excluding Column (a)) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders
|
|
|
8,032,082 |
|
|
$ |
14.18 |
|
|
|
2,063,406 |
|
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders
|
|
|
1,814,723 |
|
|
$ |
15.35 |
|
|
|
157,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,846,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,220,932 |
|
The only existing equity compensation plan not approved by our
stockholders is the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. Our Board adopted
the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan on March 1, 2002. For a
description of all equity compensation plans, please refer to
Note 11 in the accompanying notes to the consolidated
financial statements.
Share Repurchase Plan
On September 28, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized
the purchase, from time to time, of up to $100.0 million of
our Class A Common Stock, subject to the terms of the
Credit Agreement. In October 2004 and consistent with the
Board-approved repurchase plan, we repurchased
1,004,429 shares of our Class A Common Stock in the
open market at an average repurchase price of $14.56 per
share. As of December 31, 2004, we had authority to
repurchase an additional $85.4 million of our Class A
Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Maximum Dollar | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as | |
|
Value of Shares | |
|
|
Total Number | |
|
|
|
Part of Publicly | |
|
That May Yet Be | |
|
|
of Shares | |
|
Average Price | |
|
Announced | |
|
Purchased Under the | |
Period |
|
Purchased | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Program | |
|
Program | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
October 1, 2004 - October 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,004,429 |
|
|
$ |
14.56 |
|
|
|
1,004,429 |
|
|
$ |
85,360,336 |
|
November 1, 2004 - November 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85,360,336 |
|
December 1, 2004 - December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85,360,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,004,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. |
Selected Consolidated Financial Data |
The selected consolidated historical financial data presented
below has been derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000. Our consolidated historical financial
data are not comparable from year to year because of our
acquisition and disposition of various radio stations during the
periods covered. This data should be read in conjunction with
our audited consolidated financial statements and the related
notes thereto, as set forth in
25
Part II, Item 8 and with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operations set forth in Part II, Item 7 herein
(dollars in thousands, except per share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net revenues
|
|
$ |
320,132 |
|
|
$ |
281,971 |
|
|
$ |
252,597 |
|
|
$ |
202,087 |
|
|
$ |
226,640 |
|
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization
and LMA fees
|
|
|
202,441 |
|
|
|
179,536 |
|
|
|
159,766 |
|
|
|
142,357 |
|
|
|
192,065 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,168 |
|
|
|
19,445 |
|
|
|
16,865 |
|
|
|
50,585 |
|
|
|
44,003 |
|
LMA fees
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
15,635 |
|
|
|
13,374 |
|
|
|
13,710 |
|
|
|
15,180 |
|
|
|
18,232 |
|
Restructuring and impairment charges (credits)
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
6,781 |
|
|
|
16,226 |
|
Non cash stock compensation expense
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
78,369 |
|
|
|
67,869 |
|
|
|
61,688 |
|
|
|
(15,631 |
) |
|
|
(48,711 |
) |
Net interest expense
|
|
|
(19,197 |
) |
|
|
(21,983 |
) |
|
|
(29,226 |
) |
|
|
(28,716 |
) |
|
|
(26,055 |
) |
Losses on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(2,557 |
) |
|
|
(15,243 |
) |
|
|
(9,115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
|
10,300 |
|
|
|
73,280 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(25,547 |
) |
|
|
(24,678 |
) |
|
|
(76,357 |
) |
|
|
3,494 |
|
|
|
(812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
(51,053 |
) |
|
|
(30,553 |
) |
|
|
(2,298 |
) |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
(92,753 |
) |
|
|
(30,553 |
) |
|
|
(2,298 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends, accretion of
discount and redemption premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
27,314 |
|
|
|
17,743 |
|
|
|
14,875 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
30,369 |
|
|
$ |
3,133 |
|
|
$ |
(120,067 |
) |
|
$ |
(48,296 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,173 |
) |
Basic income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share before the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.37 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.37 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
Diluted income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share before the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.37 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.37 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
OTHER FINANCIAL DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Station Operating Income(1)
|
|
$ |
117,691 |
|
|
$ |
102,435 |
|
|
$ |
92,831 |
|
|
$ |
59,730 |
|
|
$ |
34,575 |
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
75,013 |
|
|
|
45,877 |
|
|
|
42,463 |
|
|
|
11,440 |
|
|
|
(14,565 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(28,757 |
) |
|
|
(146,669 |
) |
|
|
(138,734 |
) |
|
|
(48,164 |
) |
|
|
(190,274 |
) |
Net cash provided by/(used in) by financing activities
|
|
|
(21,016 |
) |
|
|
47,132 |
|
|
|
151,343 |
|
|
|
31,053 |
|
|
|
(3,763 |
) |
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,616,397 |
|
|
$ |
1,477,630 |
|
|
$ |
1,355,514 |
|
|
$ |
965,317 |
|
|
$ |
966,901 |
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
482,102 |
|
|
|
487,344 |
|
|
|
420,262 |
|
|
|
320,018 |
|
|
|
285,228 |
|
Preferred stock subject to mandatory redemption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,168 |
|
|
|
134,489 |
|
|
|
119,708 |
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
876,333 |
|
|
|
784,303 |
|
|
|
720,840 |
|
|
|
423,884 |
|
|
|
471,872 |
|
26
|
|
(1) |
Station Operating Income consists of operating income (loss)
before depreciation, amortization, LMA fees, corporate general
and administrative expenses, non cash stock compensation expense
and restructuring and impairment charges (credits). See
Item 1, Certain Definitions for further
information on the basis for calculation of this measure and a
description of the reasons for its presentation, and see
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a
quantitative reconciliation of Station Operating Income to its
most directly comparable financial measure calculated and
presented in accordance with GAAP. |
|
|
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis is
intended to provide the reader with an overall understanding of
our financial condition, changes in financial condition, results
of operations, cash flows, sources and uses of cash, contractual
obligations and financial position. This section also includes
general information about our business and a discussion of our
managements analysis of certain trends, risks and
opportunities in our industry. We also provide a discussion of
accounting policies that require critical judgments and
estimates as well as a description of certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from our historical results. You should read the
following information in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and notes to our consolidated financial
statements beginning on page F-1 in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Overview of 2004
The advertising environment during 2004 improved as compared
with the prior year. As reported by RAB, radio advertising
revenue grew approximately 2% for 2004, led by local revenue
growth of approximately 3% and despite only marginal national
revenue growth in 2004. In the markets in which we operate, we
estimate that total market revenues generated by radio increased
2-3% versus the prior year, with local revenue generating the
majority of the increase. For 2004, our revenue performance
outpaced the industry with pro forma revenues increasing 4.2%
(see the definition of pro forma results and a reconciliation of
pro forma results to our historical results that follows under
Results of Operations in this section). We estimate
that for 2004, our total market revenue share grew by 0.4%
versus the prior year. For the year, we experienced solid
revenue share growth in locally derived business, which
represented approximately 87% of our 2004 revenue. However, our
national revenue share, which declined for the year, somewhat
muted our total revenue share growth. For 2004, our share of
local revenue in the markets in which we operate grew 0.8% while
our national revenue share declined 0.5%.
During 2004 we continued our efforts and focus on cost control.
For the year, station operating expenses, pro forma for our
pending acquisitions, increased less than 1% versus the prior
year. We realized savings in sales costs as sellers originally
added in the second half of 2003 became fully productive in
2004, moving from the guaranteed salary pay structure during
their initial training period to a commission structure. These
savings in sales costs were offset by higher variable sales
costs for the year associated with revenue growth. Fixed costs
for 2004 increased approximately 1%.
Corporate general and administrative expenses increased by
$2.3 million for 2004 as compared with the prior year,
primarily due to costs associated with our efforts to comply
with the requirements mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. These costs included both an increase in employee
headcount and outside audit and professional services rendered
in connection with the compliance efforts.
During 2004, we continued our efforts to take advantage of
historically low lending rates. Through a series of amendments
to our Credit Agreement completed during 2004, we increased our
overall borrowing capacity by $150.0 million and reduced
the applicable interest rate spreads on our bank debt by 25-
27
50 basis points. As of December 31, 2004, our average
cost of debt, including the effects of our derivative positions,
was 3.9%. Our management remains committed to maintaining
manageable debt levels, which will continue to improve our
ability to generate cash flow from operations. We believe that
by maintaining a simple capital structure, we are
well-positioned to continue our growth through our operating and
acquisition strategies.
We also continue to be a leading acquirer of radio stations in
our target-sized markets. During 2004, we completed
$93.7 million of acquisitions, adding 25 radio stations to
our platform and increasing our market presence to 59 mid-sized
markets. Acquisitions completed in 2004 not only increased our
total market presence but, in certain markets, increased the
number of stations in a market, thus strengthening our
competitive position.
Our Business
For the period from our inception through December 31,
2004, we have acquired or entered into local marketing,
management and consulting agreements with radio stations
throughout the United States and the Caribbean. The following
discussion of our financial condition and results of operations
includes the results of these acquisitions and local marketing,
management and consulting agreements.
As of December 31, 2004, we owned and operated 291 stations
in 59 mid-sized U.S. media markets and provided sales and
marketing services under local marketing, management and
consulting agreements to 12 stations in 6 U.S. markets,
pending FCC approval of the acquisition of these stations. We
also currently own five stations and have obtained a license to
commence operations on one station in the Caribbean market. We
are the second largest radio broadcasting company in the United
States based on number of stations. We believe we are the eighth
largest radio broadcasting company in the United States by net
revenues, based on our 2004 pro forma net revenues. We will own
and operate a total of 304 radio stations in 61
U.S. markets upon FCC approval and consummation of all
pending acquisitions and divestitures (exclusive of new market
move-in opportunities).
Advertising Revenue and Station Operating Income
Our primary source of revenues is the sale of advertising time
on our radio stations. Our sales of advertising time are
primarily affected by the demand for advertising time from
local, regional and national advertisers and the advertising
rates charged by our radio stations. Advertising demand and
rates are based primarily on a stations ability to attract
audiences in the demographic groups targeted by its advertisers,
as measured principally by Arbitron on a periodic basis,
generally two or four times per year. Because audience ratings
in local markets are crucial to a stations financial
success, we endeavor to develop strong listener loyalty. We
believe that the diversification of formats on our stations
helps to insulate them from the effects of changes in the
musical tastes of the public with respect to any particular
format.
We have an agreement with Arbitron that gives us access to
Arbitrons ratings materials in a majority of our markets
through July 2009.
The number of advertisements that can be broadcast without
jeopardizing listening levels and the resulting rating is
limited in part by the format of a particular station. Our
stations strive to maximize revenue by managing their on-air
inventory of advertising time and adjusting prices based upon
local market conditions. In the broadcasting industry, radio
stations sometimes utilize trade or barter agreements that
exchange advertising time for goods or services such as travel
or lodging, instead of for cash. Our use of trade agreements
resulted in immaterial operating income/(expense) during the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 of
$0.4 million, $0.3 million and $(0.5) million,
respectively. We continually seek to minimize our use of trade
agreements.
Our advertising contracts are generally short-term. We generate
most of our revenue from local and regional advertising, which
is sold primarily by a stations sales staff. During the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 approximately
87%, 85% and 85%, respectively, of our revenues were from local
28
advertising. To generate national advertising sales, we engage
Interep National Radio Sales, Inc., a national representative
company.
Our revenues vary throughout the year. As is typical in the
radio broadcasting industry, we expect our first calendar
quarter will produce the lowest revenues for the year, and the
second and fourth calendar quarters will generally produce the
highest revenues for the year, with the exception of certain of
our stations, such as those in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina,
where the stations generally earn higher revenues in the second
and third quarters of the year because of the higher seasonal
population in those communities. Our operating results in any
period may be affected by the incurrence of advertising and
promotion expenses that typically do not have an effect on
revenue generation until future periods, if at all.
Our most significant station operating expenses are employee
salaries and commissions, programming expenses, advertising and
promotional expenditures, technical expenses, and general and
administrative expenses. We strive to control these expenses by
working closely with local market management. The performance of
radio station groups, such as ours, is customarily measured by
the ability to generate Station Operating Income. See the
quantitative reconciliation of Station Operating Income to the
most directly comparable financial measure calculated and
presented in accordance with GAAP, that follows in this section.
Results of Operations
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Operations. The
following analysis of selected data from our consolidated
statements of operations should be referred to while reading the
results of operations discussion that follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Percent Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2003 vs. 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net revenues
|
|
$ |
320,132 |
|
|
$ |
281,971 |
|
|
$ |
252,597 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation, amortization
and LMA fees
|
|
|
202,441 |
|
|
|
179,536 |
|
|
|
159,766 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,168 |
|
|
|
19,445 |
|
|
|
16,865 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
LMA fees
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
88.8 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
Corporate general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
15,635 |
|
|
|
13,374 |
|
|
|
13,710 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
Restructuring and impairment charges (credits)
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
** |
|
|
|
** |
|
Non cash stock compensation expense
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
186.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
78,369 |
|
|
|
67,869 |
|
|
|
61,688 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Net interest expense
|
|
|
(19,197 |
) |
|
|
(21,983 |
) |
|
|
(29,226 |
) |
|
|
(12.7 |
)% |
|
|
(24.8 |
)% |
Losses on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(2,557 |
) |
|
|
(15,243 |
) |
|
|
(9,115 |
) |
|
|
(83.2 |
)% |
|
|
67.2 |
% |
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
|
(24.3 |
)% |
|
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonoperating expense, net
|
|
|
(22,453 |
) |
|
|
(38,150 |
) |
|
|
(36,384 |
) |
|
|
(41.1 |
)% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(25,547 |
) |
|
|
(24,678 |
) |
|
|
(76,357 |
) |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
(67.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
(92,753 |
) |
|
|
502.4 |
% |
|
|
** |
|
Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends, accretion of
discount and redemption premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
27,314 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|
|
(93.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
30,369 |
|
|
$ |
3,133 |
|
|
$ |
(120,067 |
) |
|
|
869.3 |
% |
|
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
** |
Calculation is not meaningful. |
29
Our managements discussion and analysis of results of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 have been presented on a historical basis. Additionally,
for net revenue, operating expenses, and Station Operating
Income we have included our managements discussion and
analysis of results of operations on a pro forma basis.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Versus the Year Ended
December 31, 2003 |
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased $38.2 million,
or 13.5%, to $320.1 million, as compared with the prior
year. This increase was primarily attributable to revenues
associated with (i) station acquisitions and stations newly
operated under LMAs (approximately $23.6 million of the
increase) and (ii) organic revenue growth.
In addition, on a same station basis, net revenue for the 260
stations in 53 markets operated for at least a full year
increased $12.7 million or 4.9% to $275.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004, compared to net revenues
of $262.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2003. The increase in same station net revenue versus the prior
year was primarily attributable to a 6.1% increase in same
station local revenues partially offset by a 1.5% decrease in
same station national revenues. The local revenue increase for
2004 was driven by an increased revenue share captured in the
same station group markets and is reflective of the maturity of
these assets.
Station Operating Expenses, excluding Depreciation,
Amortization and LMA Fees. Station operating expenses
excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees increased
$22.9 million, or 12.8%, to $202.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004 from $179.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase was
primarily attributable to expenses associated with station
acquisitions and stations operated under LMAs. The provision for
doubtful accounts was $3.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 as compared with $3.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of net
revenues, the provision for doubtful accounts was 1% for the
year ended December 31, 2004, which was consistent with the
prior year.
In addition, on a same station basis, for the 260 stations in 53
markets operated for at least a full year, station operating
expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees
increased $3.4 million, or 2.1%, to $171.0 million for
the year ended December 31, 2004 compared to
$167.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The increase in same station operating expenses excluding
depreciation, amortization and LMA fees is primarily
attributable to increased variable sales costs associated with
revenue growth.
Corporate, General and Administrative Expenses.
Corporate, general and administrative expenses increased
$2.3 million, or 16.9%, to $15.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 compared to $13.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003. This increase was
primarily attributable to (i) increased professional fees
and other administrative costs incurred in connection with our
efforts to comply with the requirements mandated by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (approximately $0.8 million of
increase), (ii) increased corporate employee costs
(approximately $0.5 million of increase) and
(iii) increased state franchise tax expense associated with
our expanding platform (approximately $0.4 million of
increase).
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and
amortization increased $1.7 million, or 8.9%, to
$21.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $19.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily attributable
to the acquisition of stations and related increases in
depreciation expense associated with acquired assets.
LMA Fees. LMA fees total $3.0 million and
$1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively. Significant components of the current year
expense include $2.0 million associated with our operation
of stations under an LMA agreement in Columbia, Missouri and
Jefferson City, Missouri and $0.5 million of fees related
to sales services provided by the Company to one station in
Nashville under the terms of a JSA. LMA fees incurred in the
prior year include $0.3 million associated with our
operation of stations under an LMA agreement in Appleton,
Wisconsin, $0.5 million associated
30
with our operation of stations under an LMA in Nashville and
$0.2 million of fees related to sales services we provided
to one station in Nashville under the terms of a JSA.
Other Expense (Income). Interest Expense, Net. Interest
expense, net of interest income, decreased by $2.8 million,
or 12.7%, to $19.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $22.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003. The following summary details
the components of our interest expense, net of interest income
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Bank Borrowings term loan and revolving credit
facilities
|
|
$ |
17,349 |
|
|
$ |
16,619 |
|
|
$ |
730 |
|
103/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
(3,764 |
) |
Bank borrowings yield adjustment interest rate swap
|
|
|
1,753 |
|
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
Change in the fair value of interest rate option agreement
|
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
Other interest expense
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$ |
19,197 |
|
|
$ |
21,983 |
|
|
$ |
(2,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In an effort to reduce our overall leverage and simplify our
capital structure, at various times between December 2002 and
July 2003, we repurchased or redeemed all of our outstanding
103/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2008 (the Notes). The
elimination of this debt instrument reduced our interest expense
by $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
This decrease in interest expense was partially offset by
increased expense of $0.7 million compared to the prior
year associated with additional borrowings made under our credit
facilities during 2004.
Losses on Early Extinguishment of Debt. Losses on early
extinguishments of debt totaled $2.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 as compared with $15.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2003. Losses in the current
year relate to (1) the completion of an amendment and
restatement of our Credit Agreement in January 2004 and the
related retirement and replacement of our then existing eight
year term loan facility ($0.5 million), and (2) the
completion of an amendment and restatement of our Credit
Agreement in July 2004 and the related retirement and
replacement of our existing term loans ($2.1 million).
Losses in the prior year relate to the repurchase or redemption
of $132.6 million of the Notes and the retirement of our
existing $175.0 million eight-year term loan facility in
connection with refinancing activities also completed in April
2003. With regard to the redemptions of the Notes, we paid
$6.0 million in redemption premiums, $0.2 million in
professional fees and wrote off $3.0 million of debt
issuance costs. With regard to the extinguishment of our
$175.0 million eight-year term loan, we paid
$1.5 million in professional fees and wrote-off
$1.4 million of previously capitalized debt issue costs.
Losses on the early extinguishment of debt in the prior year
were the result of the syndication and arrangement of a new
credit facility and related retirement and write-off of debt
issue costs related to the pre-existing credit facility.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense totaled
$25.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Tax expense in the current and prior year is comprised entirely
of deferred tax expense and relates primarily to the
establishment of valuation allowances against net operating loss
carry-forwards generated during the periods.
Preferred Stock Dividends, Deemed Dividends, Accretion of
Discount and Premium on Redemption of Preferred Stock.
Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends, accretion of
discount and premium on redemption of preferred stock decreased
$1.9 million to $0.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 compared to $1.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003. Preferred stock dividends and
redemption premiums during the prior year are comprised of a
$0.60 million redemption premium paid in connection with
the repurchase of 4,900 shares of the Series A
Preferred Stock in the first quarter of 2003, a
$0.6 million redemption premium paid in connection with the
redemption of 9,268 shares of the Series A
31
Preferred Stock in July 2003, plus accrued dividends through
July 7, 2003 of $0.7 million. As of July 7, 2003,
we had redeemed all outstanding shares of our Series A
Preferred Stock.
Station Operating Income. As a result of the factors
described above, Station Operating Income increased
$15.3 million, or 14.9%, to $117.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004 compared to
$102.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The following table reconciles Station Operating Income to net
cash provided by operating activities as presented in the
accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows (the most
directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented
in accordance with GAAP) (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
75,013 |
|
|
$ |
45,877 |
|
|
Cash payments for LMA fees
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
Cash payments for Corporate general and administrative
|
|
|
17,432 |
|
|
|
13,041 |
|
|
Cash payments of station operating expenses in excess of accrual
based expense
|
|
|
1,893 |
|
|
|
11,213 |
|
|
Cash payments for interest expense
|
|
|
20,137 |
|
|
|
28,508 |
|
|
Cash interest income
|
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
Other cash payments
|
|
|
887 |
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Station Operating Income
|
|
$ |
117,691 |
|
|
$ |
102,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets. Intangible assets, net of
amortization, were $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These intangible
asset balances primarily consist of broadcast licenses and
goodwill, although we possess certain other intangible assets
obtained in connection with our acquisitions, such as
non-compete agreements. The increase in intangible assets, net
during the year ended December 31, 2004 is attributable to
acquisitions during the year. Specifically identified intangible
assets, including broadcasting licenses, are recorded at their
estimated fair values on the date of the related acquisition.
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair
value of tangible assets and specifically identified intangible
assets. Although intangible assets are recorded in our financial
statements at amortized cost, we believe that such assets,
especially broadcast licenses, can significantly appreciate in
value by successfully executing our operating strategies. During
2002, 2001, and 2000, we recognized gains from the sale of
stations. We believe these gains indicate that certain
internally generated intangible assets, which are not recorded
for accounting purposes, can significantly increase the value of
our portfolio of stations over time. Our strategic initiative to
focus on our core radio business is designed to enhance the
overall value of our stations and maximize the value of the
related broadcast licenses.
|
|
|
Pro Forma Year Ended December 31, 2004
Versus the Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
The pro forma results for 2004 compared to 2003 presented below
assume that the 303 radio stations in 61 markets that
we owned or operated for any portion of 2004 were acquired
effective January 1, 2003. The pro forma analysis presented
below excludes the performance of non-radio subsidiary Broadcast
Software International, Inc., referred to as BSI. BSI is our
sole non-radio broadcasting subsidiary and engages primarily in
the sale of a software product utilized solely by the radio
broadcasting industry. The entitys results were excluded
primarily due to their relative immateriality and in order to
provide our stockholders with standalone, comparable results of
our core business: radio broadcasting. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, BSI accounted for approximately 0.5% of
our consolidated net revenue and
32
approximately 0.4% of our consolidated operating income. (see
also the table below for a reconciliation of GAAP results to pro
forma results for these periods) (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net revenues
|
|
$ |
322,828 |
|
|
$ |
309,850 |
|
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and
amortization and LMA fees
|
|
|
204,704 |
|
|
|
203,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Station Operating Income
|
|
$ |
118,124 |
|
|
$ |
106,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation Between Historical GAAP Results and Pro Forma
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 | |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
GAAP | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Results | |
|
GAAP | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Results | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net revenue
|
|
$ |
320,132 |
|
|
$ |
2,696 |
(1) |
|
$ |
322,828 |
|
|
$ |
281,971 |
|
|
$ |
27,879 |
(3) |
|
$ |
309,850 |
|
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and
amortization and LMA fees
|
|
|
202,441 |
|
|
|
2,263 |
(2) |
|
|
204,704 |
|
|
|
179,536 |
|
|
|
23,744 |
(4) |
|
|
203,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Station Operating Income(5)
|
|
$ |
117,691 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
118,124 |
|
|
$ |
102,435 |
|
|
$ |
4,135 |
|
|
$ |
106,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects the addition of revenues from Rochester, Minnesota,
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Blacksburg, Virginia, Columbia,
Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri, all of which we commenced
operation of under the terms of a local marketing agreement or
acquired during 2004 ($4.5 million), offset by the
elimination of revenues from Broadcast Software International
($1.8 million). |
|
(2) |
Reflects the addition of expenses from Rochester, Minnesota,
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Blacksburg, Virginia and
Columbia-Jefferson City, Missouri, all of which we commenced
operation of under the terms of a local marketing agreement or
acquired during 2004 ($3.7 million), offset by the
elimination of operating expenses from Broadcast Software
International ($1.4 million). |
|
(3) |
Reflects the addition of revenues related to acquisitions
completed in 2003 ($5.9 million), station acquisitions
completed in 2004, including Rochester, Minnesota, Sioux Falls,
South Dakota and Blacksburg, Virginia ($15.9 million) and
stations operated under LMA agreements during 2004 including
Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri
($7.9 million). The increase is offset by the elimination
of revenues from BSI ($1.8 million). |
|
(4) |
Reflects the addition of expenses related to acquisitions
completed in 2003 ($6.5 million), station acquisitions
completed in 2004, including Rochester, Minnesota, Sioux Falls,
South Dakota and Blacksburg, Virginia ($11.9 million) and
stations operated under LMA agreements during 2004 including
Columbia, Missouri and Jefferson City, Missouri
($6.9 million). The increase is offset by the elimination
of expenses from BSI ($1.6 million). |
|
(5) |
Station Operating Income consists of operating income (loss)
before depreciation, amortization, LMA fees, corporate general
and administrative expenses, non cash stock compensation expense
and restructuring and impairment charges (credits). See
Item 1, Certain Definitions for further
information on the basis for calculation of this measure and a
description of the reasons for its presentations, and see the
preceding quantitative reconciliation of Station Operating
Income to net cash provided by operating activities, the most
directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented
in accordance with GAAP. |
Pro forma net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004
increased 4.2% to $322.8 million from $309.9 million
in the prior year. Pro forma station operating expenses
excluding depreciation, amortization
33
and LMA fees for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased
0.7% to $204.7 million from $203.3 million in the
prior year.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Versus the Year Ended
December 31, 2002 |
Net Revenues. Net revenues increased $29.4 million,
or 11.6%, to $282.0 million, as compared with the prior
year. This increase was primarily attributable to revenues
associated with station acquisitions and stations newly operated
under LMAs.
In addition, on a same station basis, net revenue for the 220
stations in 46 markets operated for at least a full year
increased $3.6 million or 1.7% to $213.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to net revenues
of $209.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2002. The increase in same station net revenue versus the prior
year was primarily attributable to a 1.7% increase in same
station local revenues and a 3.2% increase in same station
national revenues. Local and national revenue increases were
driven by an increased revenue share captured in the same
station group markets and is reflective of the maturity of these
assets.
Station Operating Expenses, excluding Depreciation,
Amortization and LMA Fees. Station operating expenses
excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees increased
$19.8 million, or 12.4%, to $179.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2003 from $159.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase was
primarily attributable to expenses associated with station
acquisitions and stations operated under LMAs. The provision for
doubtful accounts was $3.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 as compared with $2.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2002. As a percentage of net
revenues, the provision for doubtful accounts was 1% for the
year ended December 31, 2003, which was consistent with the
prior year.
In addition, on a same station basis, for the 220 stations in 46
markets operated for at least a full year, station operating
expenses excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees
increased $3.1 million, or 2.3%, to $139.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to
$136.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The increase in same station operating expenses excluding
depreciation, amortization and LMA fees is primarily
attributable to increased sales costs associated with the
addition of sellers across our platform of stations in
preparation for a return to growth in advertising spending. We
expect both the growth and increase in costs associated with our
sales force to stabilize in early 2004 as the new sellers become
trained and productive.
Corporate, General and Administrative Expenses.
Corporate, general and administrative expenses decreased
$0.3 million, or 2.4%, to $13.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 compared to $13.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2002.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and
amortization increased $2.6 million, or 15.3%, to
$19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003
compared to $16.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002. This increase was primarily attributable
to the acquisition of stations and related increases in
depreciation expense associated with acquired assets.
LMA Fees. LMA fees total $1.6 million and
$1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2002, respectively. Significant components of the current year
expense include $0.3 million associated with our operation
of stations under an LMA agreement in Appleton, Wisconsin,
$0.5 million associated with our operation of stations
under an LMA in Nashville and $0.2 million of fees related
to sales services we provided to one station in Nashville under
the terms of a JSA. LMA fees incurred in the prior year relate
primarily to stations in Ft. Walton Beach, Florida and
Macon, Georgia which were operated under the terms of local
marketing agreements during the fourth quarter of 2002
($0.9 million) and we acquired in January 2003.
Other Expense (Income). Interest Expense, Net. Interest
expense, net of interest income, decreased by $7.2 million,
or 24.8%, to $22.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 compared to
34
$29.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
The following summary details the components of our interest
expense, net of interest income (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Bank Borrowings term loan and revolving credit
facilities
|
|
$ |
16,619 |
|
|
$ |
12,698 |
|
|
$ |
3,921 |
|
Notes
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
|
16,479 |
|
|
|
(12,715 |
) |
Other interest expense
|
|
|
2,202 |
|
|
|
2,528 |
|
|
|
(326 |
) |
Interest income
|
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
|
|
(1,877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$ |
21,983 |
|
|
$ |
29,226 |
|
|
$ |
(7,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In an effort to reduce our overall leverage and simplify our
capital structure, starting in December 2002 and through July
2003, we repurchased or redeemed all of our outstanding Notes.
The elimination of this debt instrument reduced our interest
expense by $12.7 million. This decrease in interest expense
was partially offset by increased expense of $3.9 million
compared to the prior year associated with additional borrowings
made under our credit facilities during 2003. Interest income
decreased by $1.9 million compared to the prior year due to
lower cash reserves and lower interest rates earned on short
term investments.
Losses on Early Extinguishment of Debt. Losses on early
extinguishments of debt totaled $15.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 as compared with $9.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2002. Losses in the current
year relate to the repurchase or redemption of
$132.6 million of the Notes and the retirement of our
existing $175.0 million eight-year term loan facility in
connection with refinancing activities also completed in April
2003. With regard to the redemptions of the Notes, we paid
$6.0 million in redemption premiums, $0.2 million in
professional fees and wrote off $3.0 million of debt
issuance costs. With regard to the extinguishment of our
$175.0 million eight-year term loan, we paid
$1.5 million in professional fees and wrote-off
$1.4 million of previously capitalized debt issue costs.
Losses on the early extinguishment of debt in the prior year
were the result of the syndication and arrangement of a new
credit facility and related retirement and write-off of debt
issue costs related to the pre-existing credit facility.
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit. Income tax expense totaled
$24.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Tax expense in the current year is comprised entirely of
deferred tax expense and relates primarily to the establishment
of valuation allowances against net operating loss
carry-forwards generated during the period. Tax expense in the
prior year, which totaled $76.4 million, is comprised of a
$57.9 million non cash charge recognized to establish a
valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets upon the
adoption of SFAS No. 142 and $18.5 million of
deferred tax expense recorded to establish valuation allowances
against net operating loss carry-forwards generated during the
year ended December 31, 2002.
Preferred Stock Dividends, Deemed Dividends, Accretion of
Discount and Premium on Redemption of Preferred Stock.
Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends, accretion of
discount and premium on redemption of preferred stock decreased
$25.4 million to $1.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003 compared to $27.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2002. Preferred stock dividends and
redemption premiums during the current year are comprised of a
$0.6 million redemption premium paid in connection with the
repurchase of 4,900 shares of the Series A Preferred
Stock in the first quarter of 2003, a $0.6 million
redemption premium paid in connection with the redemption of
9,268 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock in July
2003, plus accrued dividends through July 7, 2003 of
$0.7 million. As of July 7, 2003, we had redeemed all
outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock.
Preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums during the
prior year are comprised of $15.0 million of redemption
premiums related to the redemption of 120,321 shares of our
Series A Preferred Stock during 2002 and $12.3 million
of accrued dividends during 2002.
35
Station Operating Income. As a result of the factors
described above, Station Operating Income increased
$9.6 million, or 10.3%, to $102.4 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003 compared to $92.8 million for
the year ended December 31, 2002.
The following table reconciles Station Operating Income to net
cash provided by operating activities from the accompanying
consolidated statements of cash flows (the most directly
comparable financial measure calculated and presented in
accordance with GAAP) (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
45,877 |
|
|
$ |
42,463 |
|
|
Cash payments for LMA fees
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
Cash payments for Corporate general and administrative
|
|
|
13,041 |
|
|
|
12,382 |
|
|
Cash payments of station operating expenses in excess of accrual
based expense
|
|
|
11,213 |
|
|
|
15,242 |
|
|
Cash payments for interest expense
|
|
|
28,508 |
|
|
|
23,180 |
|
|
Cash interest income
|
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
(2,479 |
) |
|
Other cash payments
|
|
|
2,807 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Station Operating Income
|
|
$ |
102,435 |
|
|
$ |
92,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets. Intangible assets, net of
amortization, were $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These intangible
asset balances primarily consist of broadcast licenses and
goodwill, although we possess certain other intangible assets
obtained in connection with our acquisitions, such as
non-compete agreements. The increase in intangible assets, net
during the year ended December 31, 2003 is attributable to
acquisitions during the year. Specifically identified intangible
assets, including broadcasting licenses, are recorded at their
estimated fair values on the date of the related acquisition.
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair
value of tangible assets and specifically identified intangible
assets. Although intangible assets are recorded in our financial
statements at amortized cost, we believe that such assets,
especially broadcast licenses, can significantly appreciate in
value by successfully executing our operating strategies. During
2002, 2001, and 2000, we recognized gains from the sale of
stations. We believe these gains indicate that certain
internally generated intangible assets, which are not recorded
for accounting purposes, can significantly increase the value of
our portfolio of stations over time. Our strategic initiative to
focus on our core radio business is designed to enhance the
overall value of our stations and maximize the value of the
related broadcast licenses.
|
|
|
Pro Forma Year Ended December 31, 2003
Versus the Year Ended December 31, 2002 |
The pro forma results for 2003 compared to 2002 presented below
assume that the 268 radio stations in 55 markets that we owned
or operated for any portion of 2003 were acquired effective
January 1, 2002. The pro forma analysis presented below
excludes the performance of non-radio subsidiary Broadcast
Software International, Inc., referred to as BSI, and the
operations of two stations serving Kansas City, Missouri
acquired on December 18, 2003. BSI is our sole, non-radio
broadcasting subsidiary and engages primarily in the sale of a
software product utilized solely by the radio broadcasting
industry. The entitys results were excluded primarily due
to their relative immateriality and in order to provide our
stockholders with standalone, comparable results of our core
business: radio broadcasting. BSI engages in the sale of a
software product utilized solely by the radio broadcast industry
and accounted for approximately 0.6% of our consolidated net
revenue and approximately 0.3% of our operating income from the
year ended December 31, 2003. We also excluded the results
of the two stations in Kansas City that we acquired on
December 18, 2003 due to the short period which we operated
the properties (13 days) and the insignificance of the
results to the presentation. The 13-day period results of the
stations accounted for less than 0.1% of consolidated net
revenue and consolidated operating income for the year ended
December 31,
36
2003. (see also the table below for a reconciliation of GAAP
results to pro forma results for these periods) (dollars in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net revenues
|
|
$ |
284,515 |
|
|
$ |
283,995 |
|
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and
amortization and LMA fees
|
|
|
181,262 |
|
|
|
181,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Station Operating Income
|
|
$ |
103,253 |
|
|
$ |
102,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation Between Historical GAAP Results and Pro Forma
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 | |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
GAAP | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Results | |
|
GAAP | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Results | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Revenue
|
|
$ |
281,971 |
|
|
$ |
2,544 |
(1) |
|
$ |
284,515 |
|
|
$ |
252,597 |
|
|
$ |
31,398 |
(3) |
|
$ |
283,995 |
|
Station operating expenses excluding depreciation and
amortization and LMA fees
|
|
|
179,536 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
(2) |
|
|
181,262 |
|
|
|
159,766 |
|
|
|
21,469 |
(4) |
|
|
181,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Station Operating Income(5)
|
|
$ |
102,435 |
|
|
$ |
818 |
|
|
$ |
103,253 |
|
|
$ |
92,831 |
|
|
$ |
9,929 |
|
|
$ |
102,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects the addition of revenues related to acquisitions
completed in the third quarter of 2003 ($4.5 million),
offset by the elimination of revenues from BSI
($1.8 million) and from two stations serving Kansas City,
MO acquired on December 18, 2003 ($0.1 million). |
|
(2) |
Reflects the addition of expenses related to acquisitions
completed in the third quarter of 2003 ($3.4 million),
offset by the elimination of expenses from BSI
($1.6 million) and from two stations serving Kansas City,
MO acquired on December 18, 2003 ($0.1 million). |
|
(3) |
Reflects the addition of revenues related to acquisitions
completed in the first quarter of 2002 ($9.5 million),
station acquisitions operated under LMAs during the fourth
quarter of 2002 and subsequently acquired in the first quarter
of 2003 (Ft. Walton Beach and Macon) ($9.7 million)
and station acquisitions operated under LMA agreements during
the second quarter of 2003 and subsequently acquired in third
quarter 2003 ($14.2 million). This increase is offset by
the elimination of revenues from divested markets or businesses
($0.2 million) and BSI ($1.8 million). |
|
(4) |
Reflects the addition of expenses related to acquisitions
completed in the first quarter of 2002 ($5.7 million),
station acquisitions operated under LMAs during the fourth
quarter of 2002 and subsequently acquired in the first quarter
of 2003 (Ft. Walton Beach and Macon) ($6.5 million)
and station acquisitions operated under LMA agreements during
the second quarter of 2003 and subsequently acquired in third
quarter 2003 ($11.1 million). Increase is offset by the
elimination of operating expenses from divested markets or
businesses ($0.2 million) and BSI ($1.6 million). |
|
(5) |
Station Operating Income consists of operating income (loss)
before depreciation, amortization, LMA fees, corporate general
and administrative expenses, non cash stock compensation expense
and restructuring and impairment charges (credits). See
Item 1, Certain Definitions for further
information on the basis for calculation of this measure and a
description of the reasons for its presentation, and see the
preceding quantitative reconciliation of Station Operating
Income to operating income (loss), the most directly comparable
financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with
GAAP. |
Pro forma net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2003
increased 0.2% to $284.5 million from $284.0 million
in the prior year. Pro forma station operating expenses
excluding depreciation, amortization and LMA fees for the year
ended December 31, 2003 were flat versus the prior year.
37
Seasonality
We expect that our operations and revenues will be seasonal in
nature, with generally lower revenue generated in the first
quarter of the year and generally higher revenue generated in
the second and fourth quarters of the year. The seasonality of
our business reflects the adult orientation of our formats and
relationship between advertising purchases on these formats with
the retail cycle. This seasonality causes and will likely
continue to cause a variation in our quarterly operating
results. Such variations could have an effect on the timing of
our cash flows.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal need for funds has been to fund the acquisition of
radio stations, expenses associated with our station and
corporate operations, capital expenditures, repurchases of our
outstanding Notes and Series A Preferred Stock, repurchases
of our Class A Common Stock, and interest and debt service
payments. The following table summarizes our historical funding
needs for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Acquisitions
|
|
$ |
11,001 |
|
|
$ |
133,558 |
|
|
$ |
132,345 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
12,123 |
|
|
|
9,629 |
|
|
|
11,922 |
|
Notes repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,710 |
|
|
|
29,605 |
|
Preferred stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,417 |
|
|
|
135,319 |
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
14,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of bank borrowings
|
|
|
91,741 |
|
|
|
248,656 |
|
|
|
159,813 |
|
Interest payments
|
|
|
20,137 |
|
|
|
28,508 |
|
|
|
23,180 |
|
In the short term, our principal future need for funds will
include the funding of station operating expenses, corporate
general and administrative expenses, LMA fees and interest and
debt service payments. In addition, in the long term, our
funding needs will include our pending acquisitions
($81.6 million as of December 31, 2004) and capital
expenditures associated with maintaining our station and
corporate operations. We expect maintenance capital expenditures
to be approximately $4.0 million for 2005.
In December 2004, we purchased 240 perpetual licenses from
iBiquity Digital Corporation (iBiquity), which will
enable us to convert to and utilize iBiquitys digital
broadcasting technology on 240 of our stations. Under the terms
of the agreement with iBiquity, we will convert certain of our
stations over a seven-year period beginning in 2005. We
anticipate that the average cost to convert each station will be
between $75,000 and $100,000.
Our principal sources of funds for these requirements have been
cash flow from operations and cash flow from financing
activities, such as the proceeds from offerings of our
securities and borrowings under credit facilities. Our principal
need for funds in the future is expected to include the need to
fund future acquisitions, interest and debt service payments,
working capital requirements and capital expenditures. We
believe that our presently projected cash flow from operations
and present financing arrangements, including availability under
our existing credit facilities, or borrowings that would be
available from future financing arrangements, will be sufficient
to meet our future capital needs, including the funding of
pending acquisitions, operations and debt service. However, our
cash flow from operations is subject to such factors as shifts
in population, station listenership, demographics or audience
tastes, and borrowings under financing arrangements are subject
to financial covenants that can restrict our financial
flexibility. Further, our ability to obtain additional equity or
debt financing is also subject to market conditions and
operating performance. As such, there can be no assurance that
we will be able to obtain such financing at terms, and on the
timetable, that may be necessary to meet our future capital
needs. See Risk Factors.
38
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
75,013 |
|
|
$ |
45,877 |
|
|
$ |
42,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by
approximately 63.5% for the year ended December 31, 2004.
This increase was primarily attributable to a 15.5% increase in
operating income and a 12.0% decrease in interest expense, both
as compared with the year ended December 31, 2003.
The year over year comparison of cash provided by operating
activities was also affected by the timing of interest payments
related to the Notes. We historically made our semi-annual
interest payments on the Notes on June 30 and
December 31 and, as a result, our interest expense on the
Notes has typically matched the associated cash flows. However,
during fiscal 2002 we made only one semi-annual interest payment
on the Notes during the period, which inflated net cash provided
by operating activities for the year as compared with prior
years. The payment, which was for the interest accrued for the
six month period ended June 30, 2002, totaled
$8.3 million. Interest which accrued for the second half of
2002, which totaled $6.5 million, was paid on
January 2, 2003.
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
$ |
28,757 |
|
|
$ |
146,669 |
|
|
$ |
138,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2004, net cash used in
investing activities decreased $117.9 million, to
$28.8 million, from $146.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003. For fiscal 2004, we funded approximately
$71.3 million of our $93.7 million of acquisitions
with shares of our Class A Common Stock, which contributed
to an overall decrease in cash outlays related to investing
activities in 2004. The decrease in cash outlays related to
acquisitions was partially offset by a $2.5 million
increase in capital expenditures in 2004 and $3.8 million
of escrow deposits made toward pending acquisitions.
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
$ |
(21,016 |
) |
|
$ |
47,132 |
|
|
$ |
151,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities in the current year was
primarily the result of (1) the repayment of a
$10.0 million note originally issued in connection with the
acquisition of stations in Kansas City, Missouri in 2003 and
(2) $14.6 million paid to
repurchase 1,004,429 shares of our Class A Common
Stock. Net cash provided by financing activities in 2003 was
primarily the result of net borrowings under our credit
facilities ($189.8 million), offset by cash paid to
repurchase 14,168 shares of our Series A
Preferred Stock ($15.4 million) and cash paid to repurchase
$132.6 million in aggregate principal of the Notes
($141.7 million). Net cash provided by financing activities
in 2002 was primarily the result of (1) net borrowings
under our credit facilities ($127.7 million) and
(2) the proceeds of our offering of shares of our
Class A Common Stock on May 22, 2002
($213.8 million). Cash provided by financing activities in
2002 was partially offset by (a) cash paid to
repurchase 120,321 shares of our Series A
Preferred Stock ($135.3 million), (b) cash paid to
repurchase $27.4 million in aggregate principal of the
Notes ($29.6 million) and (c) cash dividends paid on
shares of our Series A Preferred Stock ($11.8 million).
Historical Acquisitions. We completed the acquisition of
25 radio stations and a tract of land for a tower site during
the year ended December 31, 2004. Of the $93.7 million
required to fund these acquisitions, $11.0 million was paid
in cash, $71.3 million was paid in the form of shares of
our Class A Common Stock, $5.2 million was deferred
beyond the closing of the transactions, $1.4 million
represented capitalizable acquisition costs and
$4.8 million had been previously funded as escrow deposits
on the pending acquisitions. Of the $5.2 million of
deferred purchase price, we began to pay $5.0 million of the
39
amount in 60 monthly cash installments commencing in April
2004, consistent with the terms of the particular purchase
agreement. We will pay the remaining $0.2 million of
deferred purchase price upon resolution of certain post-closing
issues.
Pending Acquisitions. As of December 31, 2004, we
were a party to various agreements to acquire 13 stations
across 7 markets. The aggregate purchase price of those
pending acquisitions is expected to be approximately
$81.6 million, of which we may, at our option, pay up to
$70.3 million of the purchase price in shares of our
Class A Common Stock. We intend to fund the cash portion of
the pending acquisitions with cash on hand, cash flow from
operations, the drawings under our Credit Facility or future
credit facilities, or sources that may be available in the
future. As of December 31, 2004, $4.8 million of
escrow deposits was outstanding related to pending transactions.
In the event that we are unable to obtain financing necessary to
consummate those remaining pending acquisitions, we could be
liable for approximately $4.8 million in purchase price.
Subsequent to December 31, 2004 and through March 4,
2005, we completed the acquisition of ten radio stations across
four markets for $46.8 million in cash.
Periodically, the FCC makes FM frequencies available for
acquisition through an auction process. On November 3,
2004, the FCC held an auction for approximately
290 frequencies, located mostly in remote areas of the
country, in which we actively participated. As of the close of
the auction, we were the winning bidder for seven frequencies
and are obligated to pay the FCC $8.6 million. As of
December 31, 2004, we had funded $2.2 million toward
our obligation to the FCC in the form of an escrow deposit, to
be applied by the FCC to the bid price upon grant of the final
authorization for the frequencies. These seven authorizations
will enable us to add a station to seven of our existing markets
once constructed.
We expect to consummate our remaining pending acquisitions
during 2005, although there can be no assurance that the
transactions will be consummated within that time frame, or at
all. In addition, from time to time we complete acquisitions
following the initial grant of an assignment application by the
FCC staff, but before such grant becomes a final order, and a
petition to review such a grant may be filed in the interim.
There can be no assurance that such grants may not ultimately be
reversed by the FCC or an appellate court as a result of such
petitions, which could result in a requirement that we divest
the assets we have acquired. Our ability to make future
acquisitions in addition to the pending acquisitions is
dependent on our ability to obtain additional equity and/or debt
financing. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
obtain such financing.
Sources of Liquidity. We have historically financed our
acquisitions primarily through the proceeds from debt and equity
financings, the proceeds from asset divestitures and using cash
generated from operations. We financed the cash components of
our 2004 acquisitions primarily with cash generated from
operations.
On January 29, 2004 we completed an amendment and
restatement of our existing Credit Agreement governing our
then-existing $550 million Credit Facility, which reduced
the margin applicable to both Alternative Base Rate and Adjusted
LIBO Rate borrowings under our $325.0 million eight-year
term loan facility. The January 29, 2004 amendment and
restatement did not change any other material terms or
restrictive covenants under the credit agreement. In connection
with the amendment and restatement, we incurred
$0.5 million of professional fees, which have been included
in losses on early extinguishment of debt on the consolidated
statements of operations.
On July 15, 2004 we completed another amendment and
restatement of our existing Credit Agreement. Under the terms of
this amendment and restatement, $100.0 million of principal
outstanding under the eight-year term loan facility was retired
and simultaneously redrawn under the seven-year term loan
facility. In the aggregate there were no changes in amounts
outstanding under the Credit Facility as a result of the
amendment and restatement. The amendment and restatement also
reduced by 0.5% the margin applicable to both Alternate Base
Rate and Adjusted LIBO Rate borrowings under both the seven-year
and eight-year term loan facilities. In addition, certain
financial restrictive covenants were amended as a part of the
amendment and restatement, which generally give us greater
flexibility during fiscal years
40
2004 and 2005. The terms of the seven-year revolving commitment
were not amended. In connection with the amendment and
restatement of the Credit Agreement, we recorded a loss on early
extinguishments of debt of $2.1 million, which was
comprised of a $1.5 million write-off of previously
capitalized debt issuance costs and $0.6 million of legal
and professional fees.
On November 18, 2004, we again completed an amendment and
restatement of our existing Credit Agreement, which, among other
things, provided for (a) an increase in the existing
revolving credit facility of $75.0 million to an aggregate
principal amount of $181.9 million and (b) a new eight
year term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of
$75.0 million. The amendment and restatement also provided
for an increase in the amount of cash proceeds that may be used
to purchase shares of our Class A Common Stock from
$15.0 million to $100.0 million and new parameters for
our required Total Leverage Ratio and Senior Leverage Ratio
(each as defined by the Credit Agreement).
The Credit Facility consists of a seven-year revolving
commitment of $181.9 million, a seven-year term loan
facility of $202.7 million, an eight-year term loan
facility of $220.9 million and an eight year term loan
facility of $75.0 million. The amount available under the
seven-year revolving commitment will be automatically reduced by
17.5% of the initial aggregate principal amount
($181.9 million) in fiscal year 2006, 33.0% in fiscal year
2007, 37.0% in fiscal 2008 and 12.5% in fiscal year 2009. During
2004, we made scheduled principal payments of $20.8 million
on the seven-year term loan facility and $2.9 million on
the eight-year term loan facilities. In connection with various
acquisitions completed in 2004, we drew down a total of
$21.5 million under our seven-year revolving loan
commitment and subsequently repaid $20.5 of those borrowings
during the year. Outstanding revolving loan borrowings of
$47.5 million as of November 18, 2004 were repaid with
the proceeds of the $75.0 million eight year term loan
borrowing funded on that date. As of December 31, 2004,
$187.5 million was outstanding under the seven-year term
loan facility and $294.6 million was outstanding under the
eight-year term loan facilities.
Our obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a
pledge of substantially all of our assets in which a security
interest may lawfully be granted (including FCC licenses held by
our subsidiaries), including, without limitation, intellectual
property, real property, and all of the capital stock of our
direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries (except the capital
stock of BSI) and 65% of the capital stock of any first-tier
foreign subsidiary. The obligations under the Credit Facility
are also guaranteed by each of the direct and indirect domestic
subsidiaries, except BSI, and are required to be guaranteed by
any additional subsidiaries we acquire.
Both the revolving commitment and the term loan borrowings under
the Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate
equal to the Alternate Base Rate (as defined under the terms of
our Credit Agreement, 5.25% as of December 31, 2004) plus a
margin ranging between 0.25% to 0.75%, or the Adjusted LIBO Rate
(as defined under the terms of the Credit Agreement, 2.44% as of
December 31, 2004) plus a margin ranging between 1.25% to
1.75% (in each case dependent upon our leverage ratio). At
December 31, 2004 our effective interest rate, excluding
the interest rate swap agreement discussed below, on loan
amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility was 4.15%.
In March 2003, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement
that effectively fixed the interest rate, based on LIBOR, on
$300.0 million of our current floating rate bank borrowings
for a three-year period. As a result and including the fixed
component of the swap, at December 31, 2004, our effective
interest rate on loan amounts outstanding under the Credit
Facility is 3.88%.
A commitment fee calculated at a rate ranging from 0.50% to
0.75% per annum (depending upon our utilization rate) of
the average daily amount available under the revolving lines of
credit is payable quarterly in arrears, and fees in respect of
letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement equal to the
interest rate margin then applicable to Eurodollar Rate loans
under the seven-year revolving credit facility are payable
quarterly in arrears. In addition, a fronting fee of 0.25% is
payable quarterly to the issuing bank.
The seven-year term loan borrowings are repayable in quarterly
installments. The remaining scheduled annual amortization is
$38.0 million for fiscal 2005, $40.5 million for each
of fiscal 2006, 2007 and 2008
41
and $27.9 million for fiscal 2009. The eight-year term
loans are also repayable in quarterly installments. The
scheduled annual amortization is $3.0 million in each of
fiscal years 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, $209.4 million in
fiscal 2009 and $73.4 million in fiscal 2010. The amount
available under the seven-year revolving commitment will be
automatically reduced in quarterly installments as described
above and in the Credit Agreement. Certain mandatory prepayments
of the term loan facilities and reductions in the availability
of the revolving commitment are required to be made including:
(i) 100% of the net proceeds from the incurrence of certain
indebtedness; and (ii) 100% of the net proceeds from
certain asset sales.
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, we are subject to
certain restrictive financial and operating covenants,
including, but not limited to maximum leverage covenants,
minimum interest and fixed charge coverage covenants,
limitations on asset dispositions and the payment of dividends.
The failure to comply with the covenants would result in an
event of default, which in turn would permit acceleration of
debt under the Credit Agreement. At December 31, 2004, we
were in compliance with such financial and operating covenants.
The terms of the Credit Agreement contain events of default
after expiration of applicable grace periods, including failure
to make payments on the Credit Facility, breach of covenants,
breach of representations and warranties, invalidity of the
Credit Agreement and related documents, cross default under
other agreements or conditions relating to indebtedness of the
Company or our restricted subsidiaries, certain events of
liquidation, moratorium, insolvency, bankruptcy or similar
events, enforcement of security, certain litigation or other
proceedings, and certain events relating to changes in control.
Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the terms of
the Credit Agreement, the majority of the lenders are able to
declare all amounts under our Credit Facility to be due and
payable and take certain other actions, including enforcement of
rights in respect of the collateral. The majority of the banks
extending credit under each term loan facility and the majority
of the banks under each revolving credit facility may terminate
such term loan facility and such revolving credit facility,
respectively, upon an event of default.
We issued $160.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
our Notes in 1998. During the fourth quarter of 2002 and the
first quarter of 2003, we completed the repurchase of
$57.5 million in aggregate principal of the Notes. Related
to the $30.1 million in aggregate principal of the Notes
purchased during the first quarter of 2003, we paid a premium of
$2.4 million. In April 2003, we completed a tender offer
and consent solicitation relating to our outstanding Notes. In
the tender offer, we repurchased and canceled $88.8 million
in principal amount of the Notes, leaving $13.7 million of
the Notes outstanding. We paid $6.0 million in redemption
premiums related to the Notes tendered. Pursuant to the consent
solicitation, substantially all of the restrictive covenants in
the indenture governing the Notes were eliminated. As permitted
by the terms of indenture governing the Notes, we called for and
completed the redemption of all of the outstanding Notes on
July 3, 2003. The Notes were redeemed at a redemption price
of 105.188% of the principal amount ($0.7 million in
redemption premium), plus accrued interest through July 2,
2003.
We issued $125.0 million of our Series A Preferred
Stock in connection with our initial public offering on
July 1, 1998. The holders of the Series A Preferred
Stock were entitled to receive cumulative dividends at an annual
rate equal to
133/4%
of the liquidation preference per share of Series A
Preferred Stock, payable quarterly, in arrears. On or before
July 1, 2003, we could have, at our option, paid dividends
in cash or in additional fully paid and non-assessable shares of
Series A Preferred Stock. From July 1, 1998 until
March 31, 2002, we issued an additional $41.9 million
of shares of Series A Preferred Stock as dividends on the
Series A Preferred Stock. Prior to the redemption of all of
the outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock on
July 7, 2003, as discussed below, all of the dividends on
the Series A Preferred Stock were paid in shares, except
for (1) $3.5 million of cash dividends paid in fiscal
2000 (2) $11.8 million of cash dividends paid in
fiscal 2002 and (3) $1.1 million of cash dividends
paid in fiscal 2003.
During the third and fourth quarter of 2002 and the first
quarter of 2003, we negotiated and completed the repurchase of
125,221 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock for
$140.8 million in cash. A
42
redemption premium of $0.6 million associated with the
repurchases of 4,900 shares during the three months ended
March 31, 2003 has been included as a component of
preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. On
July 7, 2003 we completed the redemption of all outstanding
shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. The
9,268 shares outstanding were redeemed at a redemption
price of 106.875% ($0.6 million in redemption premiums)
plus accrued dividends through July 6, 2003, all in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the stock
designations governing the Series A Preferred Stock.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an on-going basis, our management, in
consultation with the Audit Committee of our Board, evaluates
these estimates, including those related to bad debts,
intangible assets, income taxes, restructuring and contingencies
and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience
and on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and
liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical
accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
We recognize revenue from the sale of commercial broadcast time
to advertisers when the commercials are broadcast, subject to
meeting certain conditions such as persuasive evidence that an
arrangement exists and collection is reasonably assured. These
criteria are generally met at the time an advertisement is
broadcast.
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make
required payments. We determine the allowance based on
historical write-off experience and trends. We review our
allowance for doubtful accounts monthly. Past due balances over
120 days are reviewed individually for collectibility. All
other balances are reviewed and evaluated on a pooled basis.
Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all
means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for
recovery is considered remote. Although our management believes
that the allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of
the amount of probable credit losses, if the financial condition
of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment
of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be
required.
We have significant intangible assets recorded in our accounts.
These intangible assets are comprised primarily of broadcast
licenses and goodwill assets acquired through the acquisition of
radio stations. Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and other Intangible Assets,
which requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets
will not be amortized. Instead, these assets will be reviewed at
least annually for impairment and charged to results of
operations only in the periods in which the recorded value of
goodwill and certain intangibles is more than its fair value. In
assessing the recoverability of our indefinite lived intangible
assets, we must conduct annual impairment testing required by
SFAS No. 142, which could result in the requirement
that we write down the carrying value of our broadcasting
licenses and goodwill in future periods. For 2004 and 2003, we
completed the intangible assets with indefinite lives impairment
test for broadcast licenses and determined that their fair value
exceeded their carrying amount and, as such, did not record an
impairment charge. As a result of our transitional intangible
assets with indefinite lives test completed in connection with
the adoption of the statement in 2002, we recorded to the
statement of operations, a $57.9 million impairment charge,
net of deferred tax benefit of $41.7 million, under the
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. For 2004
and 2003, we also completed the impairment test of goodwill and
determined that the carrying amount for each of our reporting
units did not exceed the fair value and, as such, did not record
a goodwill impairment charge. No goodwill impairment charge was
recorded for 2002 in connection with adopting the
43
statement. As of December 31, 2004, we had recorded
$1.4 billion in intangible assets and goodwill, which
represented approximately 87% of our total assets.
The fair value of our broadcast licenses and reporting units,
for purposes of our annual impairment tests, was derived
primarily by using a discounted cash flows approach. The fair
values derived include assumptions that contain a variety of
variables. These variables are based on industry data,
historical experience and estimates of future performance and
include, but are not limited to, revenue and expense growth
rates for each radio market, revenue and expense growth rates
for our stations in each market, overall discount rates based on
our weighted average cost of capital and acquisition multiples.
The assumptions used in estimating the fair value of goodwill
are based on currently available data and our managements
best estimates and, accordingly, a change in market conditions
or other factors could have a significant effect on the
estimated value. A significant decrease in the fair value of
broadcast licenses or goodwill in a market could result in
future impairment charges.
In connection with the elimination of amortization of broadcast
licenses upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the
reversal of our deferred tax liabilities relating to those
intangible assets is no longer assured within our net operating
loss carry-forward period. As a result, we determined it was
necessary to establish a valuation allowance against our
deferred tax assets and recorded a $57.9 million non cash
charge to income tax expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2002. We have also recorded additional deferred
tax expense of $25.5 million, $23.1 million and
$18.5 million to establish a valuation allowance against
net operating loss carry-forwards generated during the year
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively,
resulting from amortization of goodwill and broadcast licenses
that is deductible for tax purposes, but is no longer amortized
in the financial statements. Should we determine that we would
be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets in
the future, reduction of the valuation allowance would be
recorded in income in the period such determination was made.
Summary Disclosures About Contractual Obligations and
Commercial Commitments
The following tables reflect a summary of our contractual cash
obligations and other commercial commitments as of
December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
Payments Due By Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
1 to 3 | |
|
4 to 5 | |
|
After 5 | |
Contractual Cash Obligations: |
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Long-term debt(1)(2)
|
|
$ |
482,102 |
|
|
$ |
40,957 |
|
|
$ |
86,982 |
|
|
$ |
280,731 |
|
|
$ |
73,432 |
|
Acquisition obligations(3)
|
|
|
78,950 |
|
|
|
78,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCC auctions(4)
|
|
|
6,390 |
|
|
|
6,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
39,177 |
|
|
|
7,361 |
|
|
|
11,601 |
|
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
|
12,877 |
|
Digital radio capital obligations(5)
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
Other operating contracts(6)
|
|
|
37,325 |
|
|
|
8,631 |
|
|
|
18,503 |
|
|
|
10,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
$ |
667,944 |
|
|
$ |
143,289 |
|
|
$ |
122,086 |
|
|
$ |
304,760 |
|
|
$ |
97,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Maturities of our outstanding debt are reflective of the amended
annual amortization schedule which became effective, together
with other amendments to our Credit Agreement, as of
November 18, 2004. Under our Credit Agreement, the maturity
of our outstanding debt could be accelerated if we do not
maintain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants. |
|
(2) |
Based on long-term debt amounts outstanding at December 31,
2004, scheduled annual principal amortization and the current
effective interest rate on such long-term debt amounts
outstanding, we would be obligated to pay approximately
$76.2 million of interest on borrowings through March 2010
($19.1 million due in less than 1 year,
$32.9 million due in years 2 and 3,
$23.4 million due in years 4 and 5 and
$0.7 million due after 5 years). |
44
|
|
(3) |
Amount is reflective of the unfunded obligation under agreements
to purchase radio stations. Amounts include $70.3 million
of purchase price which, at our option, may be funded in cash or
shares of our Class A Common Stock. |
|
(4) |
Amount is reflective of the unfunded obligation relative to
seven FM frequencies we won in an auction sponsored the FCC. |
|
(5) |
Amount represents the estimated capital requirements to convert
240 of our stations to a digital broadcasting format. |
|
(6) |
Consists of contractual obligations for goods or services that
are enforceable and legally binding obligations which include
all significant terms. In addition, amounts include
$4.3 million of station acquisition purchase price which
was deferred beyond the closing of the transaction and which is
being paid monthly over a 5 year period. |
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amounts | |
|
Less Than | |
|
1 to 3 |
|
4 to 5 |
|
After 5 |
Other Commercial Commitments: |
|
Committed | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter of Credit(1)
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
$ |
3,368 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In connection with certain acquisitions, we are obligated to
provide an escrow deposit in the form of a letter of credit
during the period prior to closing. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of
December 31, 2004.
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2004, the SEC staff announced guidance on the use
of the residual method to value acquired intangible assets other
than goodwill in a business combination (EITF Topic D-108).
The SEC concluded that the residual method does not comply with
the requirements of SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations. Instead, a direct value method should be used
to determine the fair value of all intangible assets required
under SFAS No. 141. Similarly, impairment testing of
intangible assets should not rely on a residual method and
instead, should comply with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material
effect on our position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to
recognize in the statement of operations all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, based on their fair values. Accounting for share-based
compensation transactions using the intrinsic method
supplemented by pro forma disclosures will no longer be
permissible. We will be required to implement SFAS 123R for
the interim reporting period beginning July 1, 2005. We
have not yet completed our analysis of the impact of adopting
SFAS 123R and are therefore currently unable to quantify
the future effect on our financial statements. However, the
adoption of this new statement will have a significant impact on
our results of operations, as we will be required to expense the
fair value of all share-based payments.
Intangibles
As of December 31, 2004, approximately 87% of our total
assets consisted of intangible assets, such as radio broadcast
licenses and goodwill, the value of which depends significantly
upon the operational results of our business. We could not
operate the radio stations without the related FCC license for
each station. FCC licenses are renewed every eight years;
consequently, we continually monitor the activities of our
stations to ensure they comply with all regulatory requirements.
45
Historically, all of our licenses have been renewed at the end
of their respective eight-year periods, and we expect that all
licenses will continue to be renewed in the future.
Risk Factors
Many statements contained in Item 7 and elsewhere in this
report are forward-looking in nature. These statements are based
on current plans, intentions or expectations and actual results
could differ materially as we cannot guarantee that we will
achieve these plans, intentions or expectations. See
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements.
|
|
|
Risks Related to Our Business |
|
|
|
We operate in a very competitive business environment. |
Radio broadcasting is a highly competitive business. Our
stations compete for listeners and advertising revenues directly
with other radio stations within their respective markets, as
well as with other media, such as newspapers, magazines, cable
and broadcast television, outdoor advertising, the Internet and
direct mail. In addition, many of our stations compete with
groups of two or more radio stations operated by a single
operator in the same market.
Audience ratings and market shares fluctuate, and any adverse
change in a particular market could have a material adverse
effect on the revenue of stations located in that market. While
we already compete with other stations with comparable
programming formats in many of our markets, any one of our
stations could suffer a reduction in ratings or revenue and
could require increased promotion and other expenses, and,
consequently, could have a lower Station Operating Income, if:
|
|
|
|
|
another radio station in the market were to convert its
programming format to a format similar to our station or launch
aggressive promotional campaigns; |
|
|
|
a new station were to adopt a competitive format; or |
|
|
|
an existing competitor were to strengthen its operations. |
The Telecom Act allows for the consolidation of ownership of
radio broadcasting stations in the markets in which we operate
or may operate in the future. Some competing consolidated owners
may be larger and have substantially more financial and other
resources than we do. In addition, increased consolidation in
our target markets may result in greater competition for
acquisition properties and a corresponding increase in purchase
prices we pay for these properties.
|
|
|
We must respond to the rapid changes in technology, services
and standards that characterize our industry in order to remain
competitive. |
The radio broadcasting industry is subject to rapid
technological change, evolving industry standards and the
emergence of competition from new media technologies and
services. We cannot assure you that we will have the resources
to acquire new technologies or to introduce new services that
could compete with these new technologies. Various new media
technologies and services are being developed or introduced,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
satellite-delivered digital audio radio service, which has
resulted in the introduction of new subscriber-based satellite
radio services with numerous niche formats; |
|
|
|
audio programming by cable systems, direct-broadcast satellite
systems, personal communications systems, Internet content
providers and other digital audio broadcast formats; |
|
|
|
in-band on-channel digital radio, which provides multi-channel,
multi-format digital radio services in the same bandwidth
currently occupied by traditional AM and FM radio
services; and |
|
|
|
low-power FM radio, which could result in additional FM radio
broadcast outlets. |
46
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that competition arising
from new technologies or regulatory change may have on the radio
broadcasting industry or on our financial condition and results
of operations.
|
|
|
We face many unpredictable business risks that could have a
material adverse effect on our future operations. |
Our operations are subject to many business risks, including
certain risks that specifically influence the radio broadcasting
industry, that could have a material adverse effect on our
business. These include:
|
|
|
|
|
changing economic conditions, both generally and relative to the
radio broadcasting industry in particular; |
|
|
|
shifts in population, listenership, demographics or audience
tastes; |
|
|
|
the level of competition from existing or future technologies
for advertising revenues, including, but not limited to, other
radio stations, satellite radio, television stations,
newspapers, the Internet, and other entertainment and
communications media; and |
|
|
|
changes in governmental regulations and policies and actions of
federal regulatory bodies, including the U.S. Department of
Justice, the Federal Trade Commission and the FCC. |
Given the inherent unpredictability of these variables, we
cannot with any degree of certainty predict what effect, if any,
these risks will have on our future operations.
|
|
|
There are risks associated with our acquisition strategy. |
We intend to continue to grow through internal expansion and by
acquiring radio station clusters and individual radio stations
primarily in mid-size markets. We cannot predict whether we will
be successful in pursuing these acquisitions or what the
consequences of these acquisitions will be. Consummation of our
pending acquisitions and any acquisitions in the future are
subject to various conditions, such as compliance with FCC and
antitrust regulatory requirements. The FCC requirements include:
|
|
|
|
|
approval of license assignments and transfers; |
|
|
|
limits on the number of stations a broadcaster may own in a
given local market; and |
|
|
|
other rules or policies, such as the ownership attribution
rules, that could limit our ability to acquire stations in
certain markets where one or more of our stockholders has other
media interests. |
The antitrust regulatory requirements include:
|
|
|
|
|
filing with the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal
Trade Commission under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, referred to as the HSR
Act, where applicable; |
|
|
|
expiration or termination of the waiting period under the HSR
Act; and |
|
|
|
possible review by the U.S. Department of Justice or the
Federal Trade Commission of antitrust issues under the HSR Act
or otherwise. |
We cannot be certain that any of these conditions will be
satisfied. In addition, the FCC has asserted the authority to
review levels of local radio market concentration as part of its
acquisition approval process, even where proposed assignments
would comply with the numerical limits on local radio station
ownership in the FCCs rules and the Communications Act of
1934, referred to as the Communications Act.
Our acquisition strategy involves numerous other risks,
including risks associated with:
|
|
|
|
|
identifying acquisition candidates and negotiating definitive
purchase agreements on satisfactory terms; |
|
|
|
integrating operations and systems and managing a large and
geographically diverse group of stations; |
47
|
|
|
|
|
diverting our managements attention from other business
concerns; |
|
|
|
potentially losing key employees at acquired stations; and |
|
|
|
the diminishing number of properties available for sale in
mid-size markets. |
We cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully
integrate our acquisitions or manage the resulting business
effectively, or that any acquisition will achieve the benefits
that we anticipate. In addition, we are not certain that we will
be able to acquire properties at valuations as favorable as
those of previous acquisitions. Depending upon the nature, size
and timing of potential future acquisitions, we may be required
to raise additional financing in order to consummate additional
acquisitions. We cannot assure you that our debt agreements will
permit the necessary additional financing or that additional
financing will be available to us or, if available, that
financing would be on terms acceptable to our management.
|
|
|
Because a significant portion of our total assets is
represented by intangible assets and goodwill that is subject to
mandatory, annual impairment evaluations, we have written off,
and could in the future be required to write off, a significant
portion of these assets, which may adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations. |
We have acquired businesses that have been accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting. A portion of the purchase
prices for these businesses was allocated to identifiable
tangible and intangible assets, principally FCC broadcast
licenses, based on estimated fair values at the dates of the
acquisitions. Any excess purchase price was allocated to
goodwill. Prior to January 1, 2002, the cost of FCC
broadcast licenses and goodwill was amortized using the
straight-line method over an estimated useful life of
25 years. Effective January 1, 2002, upon the adoption
of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, FCC broadcast licenses and goodwill are no longer
amortized but are reviewed for impairment annually, or more
frequently if impairment indicators arise.
As required by the transition provisions of
SFAS No. 142, we compared the estimated fair values of
our FCC broadcast licenses to the book values by market and, as
a result of the comparison, took a charge in the first quarter
of 2002 of $41.7 million, net of taxes. In connection with
SFAS No. 142s transitional goodwill impairment
evaluation, the Statement required us to perform an assessment
of whether there was an indication that goodwill is impaired as
of the date of adoption. To accomplish this, we were required to
identify our reporting units and determine the carrying value of
each reporting unit by assigning the assets and liabilities,
including the existing goodwill and intangible assets, to those
reporting units as of January 1, 2002. We were required to
determine the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it
to the carrying amount of the reporting unit within six months
of January 1, 2002. To the extent the carrying amount of a
reporting unit exceeded the fair value of the reporting unit, we
would be required to perform the second step of the transitional
impairment test, as this is an indication that the reporting
unit goodwill may be impaired. Based on the results of our first
step test, we were not required to perform the second step test
on any of our reporting units.
We completed our annual impairment evaluations of existing
broadcast licenses during the fourth quarter of 2003 and 2004.
The fair values of all broadcast licenses exceeded their
carrying values and, as a result, no impairment existed in 2003
or 2004. We also completed our annual impairment evaluations of
goodwill during the fourth quarter of 2003 and 2004. The fair
values of all reporting units exceeded their carrying values
and, as a result, no impairment existed in 2003 or 2004.
However, there can be no assurance that there will not be
adjustments for impairment of either broadcast licenses or
goodwill in future periods.
In connection with the elimination of amortization of the cost
of our broadcast licenses for financial reporting purposes upon
the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the reversal of our
deferred tax liabilities relating to those intangible assets is
no longer assured within our net operating loss carry-forward
period. As a result, we determined it was necessary to establish
a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets and we
recorded a $57.9 million non-cash charge to income tax
expense during the first quarter of 2002. In addition to this
charge, we established a valuation allowance of
$7.3 million against deferred tax assets
48
created when certain broadcast licenses were written down as a
result of the transitional impairment test for broadcast
licenses upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142. We have
also recorded additional deferred tax expense of
$25.5 million, $23.1 million and $8.4 million to
establish a valuation allowance against net operating loss
carry-forwards generated during the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, resulting
from amortization of goodwill and broadcast licenses that is
deductible for tax purposes, but is no longer amortized in the
financial statements. Our management has determined that it is
more likely than not that we will realize the benefit of our
deferred tax assets, net of the existing valuation allowances,
at December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Our ability to generate revenue could be affected by economic
recession. |
We derive substantially all of our revenue from the sale of
advertising time on our radio stations. Generally, advertising
tends to decline during economic recessions or downturns.
Furthermore, because a substantial portion of our revenue is
derived from local advertisers, our ability to generate
advertising revenue in specific markets is directly affected by
local or regional economic conditions.
A continued recession, or a downturn in the U.S. economy,
or in the economy of any individual geographic market in which
we own or operate stations, could have a significant effect on
our financial condition or results of operations.
|
|
|
We are dependent on key personnel. |
Our business is managed by a small number of key management and
operating personnel, and our loss of one or more of these
individuals could have a material adverse effect on our
business. We believe that our future success will depend in
large part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled
and qualified personnel and to expand, train and manage our
employee base. We have entered into employment agreements with
some of our key management personnel that include provisions
restricting their ability to compete with us under specified
circumstances.
We also employ several on-air personalities with large loyal
audiences in their individual markets. The loss of one or more
of these personalities could result in a short-term loss of
audience share in that particular market.
|
|
|
The broadcasting industry is subject to extensive and
changing Federal regulation. |
The radio broadcasting industry is subject to extensive
regulation by the FCC under the Communications Act. We are
required to obtain licenses from the FCC to operate our
stations. Licenses are normally granted for a term of eight
years and are renewable. Although the vast majority of FCC radio
station licenses are routinely renewed, we cannot assure you
that the FCC will approve our future renewal applications or
that the renewals will not include conditions or qualifications.
The non-renewal, or renewal with substantial conditions or
modifications, of one or more of our licenses could have a
material adverse effect on us.
We must also comply with the extensive FCC regulations and
policies in the ownership and operation of our radio stations.
FCC regulations limit the number of radio stations that a
licensee can own in a market, which could restrict our ability
to consummate future transactions and in certain circumstances
could require us to divest some radio stations. The FCC also
requires radio stations to comply with certain technical
requirements to limit interference between two or more radio
stations. If the FCC relaxes these technical requirements, the
signals transmitted by our radio stations could be impaired by
other radio stations, which could have a material adverse effect
on us. Moreover, these FCC regulations and others may change
over time and we cannot assure you that those changes would not
have a material adverse effect on us.
49
|
|
|
We are required to obtain prior FCC approval for each radio
station acquisition. |
The consummation of radio station acquisitions requires prior
approval of the FCC with respect to the transfer of control or
assignment of the broadcast licenses of the acquired stations.
The FCC could prohibit or require the restructuring of our
future acquisitions, or could propose changes in its existing
rules that may reduce the number of stations that we would be
permitted to acquire in some markets. In addition, where
acquisitions would result in certain local radio advertising
revenue concentration thresholds being met, the FCC staff has a
policy of reviewing applications for proposed radio station
acquisitions with respect to local market concentration
concerns, and specifically invites public comment on these
applications. This policy may help trigger petitions to deny and
informal objections against FCC applications for our pending
acquisitions and future acquisitions, as well as FCC staff
requests for additional information. There can be no assurance
that the FCC will approve potential future acquisitions.
|
|
|
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness |
|
|
|
We have substantial indebtedness that could have a material
adverse effect on us. |
As of December 31, 2004, our long-term debt, including the
current portion, was $482.1 million, representing
approximately 55% of our stockholders equity. Our credit
facilities have interest and principal repayment and redemption
obligations that are substantial in amount and would have a
substantial impact on our stockholders.
The level of our indebtedness could have several important
consequences to you. You should note that:
|
|
|
|
|
a substantial portion of our cash flow is, and will be,
dedicated to debt service and is not, and will not be, available
for other purposes; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital,
capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate or
other purposes may be impaired in the future; |
|
|
|
certain of our borrowings are, and will be, at variable rates of
interest, which may expose us to the risk of increased interest
rates; |
|
|
|
our leveraged position and the covenants contained in our Credit
Agreement could limit our ability to compete, expand or make
capital improvements; and |
|
|
|
our level of indebtedness could make us more vulnerable to
economic downturns, limit our ability to withstand competitive
pressures and reduce our flexibility in responding to changing
business and economic conditions. |
|
|
|
Our ability to fulfill our debt obligations could be
adversely affected by many factors. |
Our ability to repay our debt obligations will depend upon our
future financial and operating performance, which, in turn, is
subject to prevailing economic conditions and financial,
business, competitive, technological, legislative and regulatory
factors, many of which are beyond our control. We cannot be
certain that our operating results, cash flow and capital
resources will be sufficient to repay our debt in the future. In
the absence of sufficient operating results and resources, we
could face substantial liquidity problems and may be required to:
|
|
|
|
|
reduce or delay planned acquisitions, expansions and capital
expenditures; |
|
|
|
sell material assets or operations; |
|
|
|
obtain additional equity capital; or |
|
|
|
restructure our debt. |
If liquidity problems require us to take any of these actions,
we cannot provide you any assurance as to: (1) the timing
of any sales or the proceeds that we could realize from these
sales, (2) our ability to
50
obtain additional equity capital or successfully complete a
restructuring of our debt, or (3) whether these sales,
additional equity capital or restructuring of debt could be
effected on terms satisfactory to us or at all.
|
|
|
Our credit facilities impose significant restrictions on
us. |
Our credit facilities restrict, among other things, our ability
to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
|
pay dividends, make particular types of investments or make
other restricted payments; |
|
|
|
enter into some types of transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with any other person; or |
|
|
|
sell, assign, transfer, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of
all or substantially all of our assets. |
In addition, our credit facilities also restrict our ability to
incur liens or to sell some assets. Our credit facilities also
require us to maintain specified financial ratios and to satisfy
certain financial condition tests. Our ability to meet those
financial ratios and financial condition tests can be affected
by events beyond our control, and we cannot be sure that we will
maintain those ratios or meet those tests. A breach of any of
these restrictions could result in a default under our debt
agreements. Our lenders have taken security interests in
substantially all of our consolidated assets, and we have
pledged the stock of our subsidiaries to secure the debt under
our credit facility. If an event of default under our credit
facilities occurs, our credit facility lenders could declare all
amounts outstanding, including accrued interest, immediately due
and payable. If we could not repay those amounts, those lenders
could proceed against the collateral pledged to them to secure
that indebtedness. If our credit facility indebtedness were
accelerated, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full
that indebtedness. Our ability to comply with the restrictions
and covenants in our credit facilities will depend upon our
future performance and various other factors, such as business,
competitive, technological, legislative and regulatory factors,
some of which are beyond our control. If we fail to comply with
the restrictions and covenants in our existing credit
facilities, our lenders could declare all amounts owed to them
immediately due and payable.
|
|
|
Risks Related to Our Class A Common Stock |
|
|
|
The public market for our Class A Common Stock may be
volatile. |
We cannot assure you that the market price of our Class A
Common Stock will not decline, and the market price could be
subject to wide fluctuations in response to such factors as:
|
|
|
|
|
conditions and trends in the radio broadcasting industry; |
|
|
|
actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating
results, including audience share ratings and financial results; |
|
|
|
changes in financial estimates by securities analysts; |
|
|
|
technological innovations; |
|
|
|
competitive developments; |
|
|
|
adoption of new accounting standards affecting companies in
general or affecting companies in the radio broadcasting
industry in particular; and |
|
|
|
general market conditions and other factors. |
Further, the stock markets, and in particular the NASDAQ
National Market, on which our Class A Common Stock is
listed, from time to time have experienced extreme price and
volume fluctuations that were not necessarily related or
proportionate to the operating performance of the affected
companies. In
51
addition, general economic, political and market conditions such
as recessions, interest rate movements or international currency
fluctuations, may adversely affect the market price of our
Class A Common Stock.
|
|
|
Certain stockholders control or have the ability to exert
significant influence over the voting power of our capital
stock. |
As of February 18, 2005, and after giving effect to the
exercise of all of their options exercisable within 60 days
of that date, Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., our Chairman,
President, Chief Executive Officer and a director, John W.
Dickey, our Executive Vice President, together with DBBC,
L.L.C., one of our stockholders that is principally controlled
by Messrs. L. Dickey, J. Dickey and other members of their
family, collectively own 5,810,212 shares, or approximately
9.4%, of our outstanding Class A Common Stock, and
2,145,561 shares, or 100.0%, of our outstanding
Class C Common Stock, which collectively represent
approximately 32.8% of the outstanding voting power of our
common stock. Consequently, they have the ability to exert
significant influence over our policies and management. The
interests of these stockholders may differ from the interests of
our other stockholders.
As of February 18, 2005, BA Capital Company, L.P., referred
to as BA Capital, and its affiliate, BancAmerica Capital
Investors SBIC I, L.P., referred to as BACI, together own
840,250 shares, or 1.4%, of our Class A Common Stock
and 11,630,759 shares, or 100.0%, of our nonvoting
Class B Common Stock, which is convertible into shares of
Class A Common Stock. BA Capital also holds options
exercisable within 60 days of February 18, 2005 to
purchase 105,000 shares of our Class A Common
Stock and Robert H. Sheridan, III, one of our directors and
a senior vice president and managing director with an economic
interest in the general partners of both BA Capital and BACI,
holds options exercisable within 60 days of
February 18, 2005 to purchase 64,999 shares of
our Class A Common Stock. Assuming that those options were
exercised for shares of our Class A Common Stock, and
giving effect to the conversion into shares of our Class A
Common Stock of all shares of our Class B Common Stock held
by BA Capital and BACI, BA Capital and BACI would hold
approximately 17.9% of the total voting power of our common
stock. BA Capital and BACI are both affiliates of Bank of
America Corporation. BA Capital has the right to designate one
member of our board and Mr. Sheridan currently serves on
our board as BA Capitals designee. As a result, BA
Capital, BACI and Mr. Sheridan have the ability to exert
significant influence over our policies and management, and
their interests may differ from the interests of our other
stockholders.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
In various places in this annual report on Form 10-K, we
use statements that constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our
future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Although
we believe that, in making any of these statements, our
expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, these
statements may be influenced by factors that could cause actual
outcomes and results to be materially different from these
projected. When used in this document, words such as
anticipates, believes,
expects, intends, and similar
expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are
intended to identify these forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties, including those referred above to under
Risk Factors and as otherwise described in our
periodic filings with the SEC from time to time.
Important facts that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in forward-looking statements, certain of
which are beyond our control, include:
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of general economic conditions in the United States
or in specific markets in which we currently do business; |
|
|
|
industry conditions, including existing competition and future
competitive technologies; |
|
|
|
the popularity of radio as a broadcasting and advertising medium; |
52
|
|
|
|
|
cancellations, disruptions or postponements of advertising
schedules in response to national or world events; |
|
|
|
our capital expenditure requirements; |
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
risks and uncertainties relating to our leverage; |
|
|
|
interest rates; |
|
|
|
our continued ability to identify suitable acquisition targets; |
|
|
|
consummation and integration of pending or future acquisitions; |
|
|
|
access to capital markets; and |
|
|
|
fluctuations in exchange rates and currency values. |
Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the
forward-looking statements. Accordingly, we cannot be certain
that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking
statements will occur or, if any of them do occur, what impact
they will have on us. We assume no obligation to update any
forward-looking statements as a result of new information or
future events or developments, except as required under federal
securities laws. We caution you not to place undue reliance on
any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
of this annual report on Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
Interest Rate Risk
At December 31, 2004, 100% of our long-term debt bears
interest at variable rates. Accordingly, our earnings and
after-tax cash flow are affected by changes in interest rates.
Assuming the current level of borrowings at variable rates and
assuming a one percentage point change in the 2004 average
interest rate under these borrowings, it is estimated that our
2004 interest expense and net income would have changed by
$4.8 million. As part of our efforts to mitigate interest
rate risk, in March 2003, we entered into an interest rate swap
agreement that effectively fixed the interest rate, based on
LIBOR, on $300.0 million of our current floating rate bank
borrowings for a three-year period. This agreement is intended
to reduce our exposure to interest rate fluctuations and was not
entered into for speculative purposes. Segregating the
$182.1 million of borrowings outstanding at
December 31, 2004 which are not subject to the interest
rate swap and assuming a one percentage point change in the 2004
average interest rate under these borrowings, it is estimated
that our 2004 interest expense and net income would have changed
by $1.8 million.
In the event of an adverse change in interest rates, our
management would likely take actions, in addition to the
interest rate swap agreement discussed above, to mitigate our
exposure. However, due to the uncertainty of the actions that
would be taken and their possible effects, additional analysis
is not possible at this time. Further, such analysis would not
consider the effects of the change in the level of overall
economic activity that could exist in such an environment.
Foreign Currency Risk
As a result of the 1997 acquisition of Caribbean Communications
Company Ltd., (CCC), we have operations in five
countries throughout the English-speaking Caribbean. All foreign
operations are measured in their local currencies. As a result,
our financial results could be affected by factors such as
changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic
conditions in the foreign markets in which we have operations.
53
We maintain no derivative instruments to mitigate the exposure
to translation and/or transaction risk. However, this does not
preclude the adoption of specific hedging strategies in the
future. Our foreign operations generated net income of
approximately $0.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
It is estimated that a 5% change in the value of the
U.S. dollar to the Eastern Caribbean dollar or the Trinidad
and Tobago dollar would change net income for the year ended
December 31, 2004 by an amount less than $0.1 million.
|
|
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
The information in response to this item is included in our
consolidated financial statements, together with the report
thereon of KPMG LLP, beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A. |
Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed
to ensure that information we are required to disclose in
reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Such
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in reports we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Executive Vice
President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(CFO), as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. At the end of the period covered
by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation,
the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
|
|
Managements report on internal control over
financial reporting. |
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting for us.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed
by, or under the supervision of, our CEO and CFO, and affected
by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures
are being made only in accordance with the authorizations of our
management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risks that control systems may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.
54
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, has assessed the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria for effective
internal control over financial reporting described in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on
this assessment, our management, including our CEO and CFO, has
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2004.
Our independent auditor, KPMG LLP, a registered public
accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on our
managements assessment of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and this
attestation report follows immediately below.
/s/ Martin R.
Gausvik, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
/s/ Lewis W.
Dickey, Jr., Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm |
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cumulus Media Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting, that Cumulus Media Inc. maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Cumulus Media Inc.s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
55
In our opinion, managements assessment that Cumulus Media
Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Also, in our opinion, Cumulus Media Inc. maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Cumulus Media Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, and our report dated March 29, 2005
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial
statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 2005
|
|
|
Changes in internal control over financial
reporting. |
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting identified in connection with our
managements evaluation of our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during our fourth fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B. |
Other Information |
None.
PART III
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
The information required by this item with respect to our
directors, compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange
Act and our code of ethics is incorporated by reference to the
information set forth under the captions Members of the
Board of Directors, Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance, Information about
the Board of Directors and Code of Ethics in
our definitive proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, expected to be filed within 120 days of our
fiscal year end. The required information regarding our
executive officers is contained in Part I of this report.
|
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Executive Compensation in our definitive proxy
statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, expected
to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end.
|
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners &
Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The information required by this item with respect to the
security ownership of our management and certain beneficial
owners is incorporated by reference to the information set forth
under the caption Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management in our definitive proxy statement
for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, expected to be
filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end. The
56
required information regarding securities authorized for
issuance under our executive compensation plans is contained in
Part II of this report.
|
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in
our definitive proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, expected to be filed within 120 days of our
fiscal year end.
|
|
Item 14. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Auditor Fees and Services in our definitive proxy
statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, expected
to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year end.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on
Form 8-K |
(a) 1. Index to Consolidated Financial
Statements
2. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
3. Financial Statements and Financial Statement
Schedule
The Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule listed
in the index to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Cumulus
Media Inc. that appear on page F-1 of this Report on
Form 10-K are filed as a part of this report.
4. Exhibits
The exhibits to this Report on Form 10-K are listed under
item 15(c) below.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
The Company filed the following current reports on Form 8-K
during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
October 19, 2004 (Items 1.01 and 9.01); and |
|
|
|
November 24, 2004 (Item 1.01). |
(c) Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Cumulus
Media Inc., (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys current report on Form
8-K, filed on August 2, 2002). |
|
3.2* |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cumulus Media Inc., as amended. |
|
4.1 |
|
|
Form of Class A Common Stock Certificate (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys
current report on Form 8-K, filed on August 2, 2002). |
|
4.2 |
|
|
Voting Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1998, by and between
NationsBanc Capital Corp., Cumulus Media Inc. and the
shareholders named therein (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2001). |
|
10.1 |
|
|
Form of Cumulus Media Inc. 1998 Executive Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1, filed on
June 25, 1998 and declared effective on June 26, 1998
(Commission File No. 333-48849)). |
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Form of Cumulus Media Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1, filed on
June 25, 1998 and declared effective on June 26, 1998
(Commission File No. 333-48849)). |
|
10.3 |
|
|
Cumulus Media Inc. 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys
registration statement on Form S-8, filed on June 7,
2001 (Commission File No. 333-62542)). |
|
10.4 |
|
|
Cumulus Media Inc. 1999 Executive Stock Incentive Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the
Companys registration statement on Form S-8, filed on
June 7, 2001(Commission File No. 333-62542)). |
|
10.5 |
|
|
Cumulus Media Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys
registration statement on Form S-8, filed on June 7,
2001 (Commission File No. 333-62538)). |
|
10.6 |
|
|
Cumulus Media Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys
registration statement on Form S-8, filed on April 15,
2003 (Commission File No. 333-104542)). |
|
10.7 |
|
|
Cumulus Media 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys registration
statement on Form S-8, filed on August 9, 2004 (Commission
File No. 333-118047)). |
|
10.8 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Cumulus
Media Inc. and Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys current
report on Form 8-K, filed on October 19, 2004). |
|
10.9 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Cumulus Media
Inc. and Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2001). |
|
10.10 |
|
|
Employment Agreement between Cumulus Media Inc. and John G.
Pinch (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of
the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2001). |
|
10.11 |
|
|
Employment Agreement between Cumulus Media Inc. and Martin
Gausvik (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3
of the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2001). |
|
10.12 |
|
|
Employment Agreement between Cumulus Media Inc. and John W.
Dickey (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of
the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2001). |
|
10.13 |
|
|
Promissory Note, dated as of February 2, 2000, made by
Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., in favor of Cumulus Media Inc.
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the
Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2001). |
|
10.14 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 30, 1998,
by and among Cumulus Media Inc., NationsBanc Capital Corp.,
Heller Equity Capital Corporation, The State of Wisconsin
Investment Board and The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2001). |
|
10.15 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of
January 23, 2002, by and among Cumulus Media Inc., Aurora
Communications, LLC and the other parties identified therein
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.2 of the
Companys current report on Form 8-K, filed on
February 7, 2002). |
|
10.16 |
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 28, 2002,
between Cumulus Media Inc. and DBBC, L.L.C. (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002). |
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17 |
* |
|
Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated as of
November 18, 2004 among Cumulus Media Inc., the Lenders
party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent,
including the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2003,
as amended and restated as of November 18, 2004, among
Cumulus Media Inc., the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as Administrative Agent. |
|
21.1* |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company. |
|
23.1* |
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP. |
|
31.1* |
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2* |
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1* |
|
|
Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
59
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on the 29th day of March 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Martin R. Gausvik |
|
Executive Vice President, Treasurer |
|
and Chief Financial Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lewis W. Dickey,
Jr.
Lewis
W. Dickey, Jr. |
|
Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director,
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
March 29, 2005 |
|
/s/ Martin R. Gausvik
Martin
R. Gausvik |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
March 29, 2005 |
|
/s/ Ralph B. Everett
Ralph
B. Everett |
|
Director |
|
March 29, 2005 |
|
/s/ Holcombe T. Green,
Jr.
Holcombe
T. Green, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
March 29, 2005 |
|
/s/ Eric P. Robison
Eric
P. Robison |
|
Director |
|
March 29, 2005 |
|
/s/ Robert H. Sheridan,
III
Robert
H. Sheridan, III |
|
Director |
|
March 29, 2005 |
60
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following Consolidated Financial Statements of Cumulus Media
Inc. are included in Item 8:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page in This | |
|
|
Report | |
|
|
| |
(1)Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
(2)Financial Statement Schedule
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-1 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cumulus Media Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Cumulus Media Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004
and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004. In connection with our audits of the
consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the
financial statement schedule Valuation and Qualifying
Accounts. These consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Cumulus Media Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in
our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Cumulus Media Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated March 29, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of, and the effective operation of,
internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 2005
F-2
CUMULUS MEDIA INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands, except for share and per share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
31,960 |
|
|
$ |
6,720 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$2,650 and $2,488 respectively
|
|
|
54,834 |
|
|
|
51,215 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
8,366 |
|
|
|
14,706 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
95,576 |
|
|
|
73,388 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
93,206 |
|
|
|
91,149 |
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
1,132,736 |
|
|
|
1,054,201 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
276,060 |
|
|
|
245,508 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
18,819 |
|
|
|
13,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,616,397 |
|
|
$ |
1,477,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
19,078 |
|
|
$ |
21,500 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
40,957 |
|
|
|
27,313 |
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
60,035 |
|
|
|
48,846 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
441,145 |
|
|
|
460,031 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
234,242 |
|
|
|
183,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
740,064 |
|
|
|
693,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, 20,262,000 shares authorized, par value
$0.01 per share, including: 250,000 shares designated
as
133/4%
Series A Cumulative Exchangeable Redeemable Preferred Stock
due 2009, stated value $1,000 per share, and
12,000 shares designated as 12% Series B Cumulative
Preferred Stock, stated value $10,000 per share;
0 shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share;
100,000,000 shares authorized; 57,677,996 and
53,816,502 shares issued; 56,673,567 and
53,816,502 shares outstanding respectively
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
Class B common stock, par value $.01 per share;
20,000,000 shares authorized; 11,630,759 shares issued
and outstanding
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Class C common stock, par value $.01 per share;
30,000,000 shares authorized; 644,871 shares issued
and outstanding
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,004,429 shares at
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
(14,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
1,011,075 |
|
|
|
937,279 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(118,676 |
) |
|
|
(149,045 |
) |
Loan to officer
|
|
|
(4,992 |
) |
|
|
(4,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
876,333 |
|
|
|
784,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,616,397 |
|
|
$ |
1,477,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
CUMULUS MEDIA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except for share and per share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net revenues
|
|
$ |
320,132 |
|
|
$ |
281,971 |
|
|
$ |
252,597 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Station operating expenses, excluding depreciation, amortization
and LMA fees (including provision for doubtful accounts of
$3,694, $3,441 and $2,596 respectively)
|
|
|
202,441 |
|
|
|
179,536 |
|
|
|
159,766 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,168 |
|
|
|
19,445 |
|
|
|
16,865 |
|
|
LMA fees
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
Corporate general and administrative (excluding non cash stock
compensation expense of $(375), $490 and $171, respectively)
|
|
|
15,635 |
|
|
|
13,374 |
|
|
|
13,710 |
|
|
Restructuring and impairment charges (credits)
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
Non cash stock compensation expense
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
241,763 |
|
|
|
214,102 |
|
|
|
190,909 |
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
78,369 |
|
|
|
67,869 |
|
|
|
61,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(19,870 |
) |
|
|
(22,585 |
) |
|
|
(31,705 |
) |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
Losses on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(2,557 |
) |
|
|
(15,243 |
) |
|
|
(9,115 |
) |
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonoperating expense, net
|
|
|
(22,453 |
) |
|
|
(38,150 |
) |
|
|
(36,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
55,916 |
|
|
|
29,719 |
|
|
|
25,304 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(25,547 |
) |
|
|
(24,678 |
) |
|
|
(76,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before the cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
(51,053 |
) |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
(92,753 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends, accretion of
discount, and redemption premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
27,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
30,369 |
|
|
$ |
3,133 |
|
|
$ |
(120,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share before the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share before the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
|
|
|
68,789,035 |
|
|
|
64,305,693 |
|
|
|
54,466,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
|
|
|
71,308,102 |
|
|
|
66,950,422 |
|
|
|
54,466,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
CUMULUS MEDIA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock | |
|
Class B Common Stock | |
|
Class C Common Stock | |
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued Class A | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Common | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
Par | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Stock Held in | |
|
Loans to | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Shares | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Shares | |
|
Value | |
|
Stock | |
|
Income | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Escrow | |
|
Officers | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at January 1, 2002
|
|
|
28,505,887 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
|
5,914,343 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
|
1,529,277 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
504,259 |
|
|
$ |
(61,333 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,417 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,984 |
) |
|
$ |
423,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92,753 |
) |
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
833,249 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
Proceeds from secondary offering
|
|
|
10,549,448 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,351 |
|
|
Proceeds from warrant exercises
|
|
|
369,630 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,291 |
|
|
Non cash stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,314 |
) |
|
Common stock offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,642 |
) |
|
Share exchange
|
|
|
2,498,134 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(1,613,728 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(884,406 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock/ warrants in acquisitions
|
|
|
6,856,843 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
8,944,339 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,094 |
|
|
Return of previously issued common stock held in escrow to the
Company
|
|
|
(770,000 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,409 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
48,843,191 |
|
|
$ |
488 |
|
|
|
13,244,954 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
|
644,871 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
884,284 |
|
|
$ |
(154,086 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,984 |
) |
|
$ |
720,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative instrument
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
538,460 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,236 |
|
|
Proceeds from warrant exercises
|
|
|
16,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
706,424 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,679 |
|
|
Non cash stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
Preferred stock dividends and redemption premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,908 |
) |
|
Share exchange
|
|
|
2,320,619 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(2,320,619 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in acquisitions
|
|
|
2,097,418 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,532 |
|
|
Collection on loan to officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
53,816,502 |
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
|
|
11,630,759 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
644,871 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
937,279 |
|
|
$ |
(149,045 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,992 |
) |
|
$ |
784,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative instrument
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
292,359 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
Non cash stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
Treasury stock buybacks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,640 |
) |
|
Issuance of common stock in acquisitions
|
|
|
3,569,135 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
57,677,996 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
|
11,630,759 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
|
|
644,871 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
(14,640 |
) |
|
$ |
2,867 |
|
|
$ |
1,011,075 |
|
|
$ |
(118,676 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,992 |
) |
|
$ |
876,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
CUMULUS MEDIA INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
30,369 |
|
|
$ |
5,041 |
|
|
$ |
(92,753 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,700 |
|
|
Write-off of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
|
6,928 |
|
|
Redemption premiums for repurchase of
103/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,128 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
20,327 |
|
|
|
18,512 |
|
|
|
15,947 |
|
|
Amortization of goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
Change in the fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets or stations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(5,400 |
) |
|
Stock issuance portion of litigation settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
25,547 |
|
|
|
24,678 |
|
|
|
76,357 |
|
|
Non cash stock compensation
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
Adjustment of restructuring charges
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(971 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions/dispositions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(5,102 |
) |
|
|
(7,006 |
) |
|
|
(9,125 |
) |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
(3,675 |
) |
|
|
(2,612 |
) |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(1,236 |
) |
|
|
(18,109 |
) |
|
|
4,405 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
(2,472 |
) |
|
|
847 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,576 |
) |
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
75,013 |
|
|
|
45,877 |
|
|
|
42,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(11,001 |
) |
|
|
(133,558 |
) |
|
|
(132,345 |
) |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
8,774 |
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow deposits on pending acquisitions
|
|
|
(3,820 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
633 |
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(12,123 |
) |
|
|
(9,629 |
) |
|
|
(11,922 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(613 |
) |
|
|
(4,136 |
) |
|
|
(3,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(28,757 |
) |
|
|
(146,669 |
) |
|
|
(138,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from bank credit facility
|
|
|
96,499 |
|
|
|
438,500 |
|
|
|
287,500 |
|
|
Repayments of borrowings from bank credit facility
|
|
|
(91,741 |
) |
|
|
(248,656 |
) |
|
|
(159,813 |
) |
|
Payments for repurchase of
103/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes, including redemption premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141,710 |
) |
|
|
(29,605 |
) |
|
Payments for debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(2,301 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,743 |
) |
|
Payments on promissory notes
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
Payment of dividend on Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
(11,806 |
) |
|
Payments for repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(14,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for redemption of preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,417 |
) |
|
|
(135,319 |
) |
|
Proceeds from collection of officer loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
10,749 |
|
|
|
213,796 |
|
|
Payments for preferred and common stock offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(21,016 |
) |
|
|
47,132 |
|
|
|
151,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
25,240 |
|
|
|
(53,660 |
) |
|
|
55,072 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
6,720 |
|
|
|
60,380 |
|
|
|
5,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
31,960 |
|
|
$ |
6,720 |
|
|
$ |
60,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
20,137 |
|
|
$ |
28,508 |
|
|
$ |
23,180 |
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non cash operating, investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade revenue
|
|
$ |
18,750 |
|
|
$ |
18,613 |
|
|
$ |
15,978 |
|
|
Trade expense
|
|
|
18,317 |
|
|
|
18,296 |
|
|
|
16,518 |
|
|
Assets acquired through notes payable
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
Liabilities assumed through acquisitions
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
10,242 |
|
|
Preferred stock dividends paid in kind, deemed dividends and
accretion of discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock and warrants in exchange for acquired
businesses
|
|
|
71,344 |
|
|
|
38,532 |
|
|
|
209,094 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: |
Cumulus Media Inc., (Cumulus or the
Company) is a radio broadcasting corporation
incorporated in the state of Delaware, focused on acquiring,
operating and developing commercial radio stations in mid-size
radio markets in the United States.
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Cumulus and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its
estimates, including those related to bad debts, intangible
assets, derivative financial instruments, income taxes,
restructuring and contingencies and litigation. The Company
bases its estimates on historical experience and on various
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents.
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Concentration of Credit
Risks |
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do
not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the
Companys best estimate of the amount of probable credit
losses in the Companys existing accounts receivable. The
Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off
experience and trends. The Company reviews its allowance for
doubtful accounts monthly. Past due balances over 120 days
are reviewed individually for collectibility. All other balances
are reviewed and evaluated on a pooled basis. Account balances
are charged off against the allowance after all means of
collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is
considered remote. The Company does not have any
off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers.
In the opinion of management, credit risk with respect to
accounts receivable is limited due to the large number of
diversified customers and the geographic diversification of the
Companys customer base. The Company performs ongoing
credit evaluations of its customers and believes that adequate
allowances for any uncollectible accounts receivable are
maintained. Management believes the Companys existing
credit and collection policies and procedures, coupled with the
maintenance of an effective control environment, have been
effective in reducing the Companys loss experience from
uncollectible accounts receivable.
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Property and
equipment acquired in business combinations are recorded at
their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition under the
purchase method of accounting. Equipment under capital leases is
stated at the present value of minimum lease payments.
F-7
Depreciation of property and equipment is computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets. Equipment held under capital leases and leasehold
improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over
the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the
remaining term of the lease. Routine maintenance and repairs are
expensed as incurred. Depreciation of construction in progress
is not recorded until the assets are placed into service.
|
|
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
The Company adopted SFAS No. 143, Accounting for
Asset Retirement Obligations in 2003. This statement
requires that the fair value of a legal liability for an asset
retirement obligation be recorded in the period in which it is
incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made.
Upon recognition of a liability, the asset retirement cost is
recorded as an increase in the carrying value of the related
long-lived asset and then depreciated over the life of the
asset. The Company determined that certain obligations under
lease agreements for studio, transmitter sites and tower sites
meet the scope requirements of SFAS No. 143 and,
accordingly, determined the fair value of our obligation in
accordance with the statement. The resulting obligation fair
value was estimated to be insignificant and, as a result, an
asset retirement obligation was not recorded by the Company.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
The Companys intangible assets are comprised of broadcast
licenses, goodwill and certain other intangible assets. Goodwill
represents the excess of costs over fair value of assets of
businesses acquired. In accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and
intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination
and determined to have an indefinite useful life, which includes
the Companys broadcast licenses, are not amortized, but
instead tested for impairment at least annually.
SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with
estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective
estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values, and
reviewed for impairment in accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets.
In determining that the Companys broadcast licenses
qualified as indefinite lived intangibles, management considered
a variety of factors including the Federal Communications
Commissions historical track record of renewing broadcast
licenses, the very low cost to the Company of renewing the
applications (approximately $150 per license), the relative
stability and predictability of the radio industry, the
consistent historical revenue growth of the radio industry
despite competitive factors and the relatively low level of
capital investment required to maintain the physical plant of a
radio station.
The costs related to the issuance of debt are capitalized and
amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debt.
During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 the
Company recognized amortization expense of debt issuance costs
of $0.2 million, $0.4 million and $1.4 million,
respectively.
The Companys losses on extinguishment of debt have been
reflected as a component of income (loss) from continuing
operations, consistent with the provisions of issued
SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements
No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13,
and Technical Corrections. Losses recognized during 2004,
2003 and 2002 relate to the redemption of the Companys
103/8% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2008 and the retirement of certain term
loan borrowings under the Companys credit facilities.
|
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments |
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in
accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This standard
requires the Company to
F-8
recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.
Fair value changes are recorded in income for any contracts not
classified as qualifying hedging instruments. For derivatives
qualifying as cash flow hedge instruments, the effective portion
of the derivative fair value change must be recorded through
other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders
equity.
Revenue is derived primarily from the sale of commercial airtime
to local and national advertisers. Revenue is recognized as
commercials are broadcast.
The Company trades commercial airtime for goods and services
used principally for promotional, sales and other business
activities. An asset and liability is recorded at the fair
market value of the goods or services received, which
approximates the fair value of the air time surrendered in the
trade. Trade revenue is recorded and the liability is relieved
when commercials are broadcast and trade expense is recorded and
the asset relieved when goods or services are consumed.
|
|
|
Local Marketing Agreements |
In certain circumstances, the Company enters into a local
marketing agreement (LMA) or time brokerage
agreement with a Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) licensee of a radio station. In a typical LMA,
the licensee of the station makes available, for a fee, airtime
on its station to a party, which supplies programming to be
broadcast on that airtime, and collects revenues from
advertising aired during such programming. Revenues earned and
LMA fees incurred pursuant to local marketing agreements or time
brokerage agreements are recognized at their gross amounts in
the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
Variable Interest Entities |
The Company accounts for entities qualifying as variable
interest entities (VIEs) in accordance with FASB
Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51
(FIN 46R). FIN 46R addresses the
consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest
entities (VIEs) as defined in the Interpretation.
The Company has determined that several entities with which it
has existing contractual relationships under local marketing
agreements (LMA) qualify as VIEs. A typical LMA is
an agreement under which a Federal Communications Commission
licensee of a radio station makes available, typically for a
fee, air time on its station to another party. The other party
provides programming to be broadcast during such airtime and
collects revenues from advertising it sells for broadcast during
such programming. During various periods during 2004, the
Company operated 20 stations under local marketing agreements.
These stations were owned and licensed to 7 separate entities
qualifying as VIEs. Under these agreements, the licensee of the
stations does not have the right to access the Companys
assets to pay general creditors. Further, the Company has not
pledged any of its assets as collateral for obligations of the
VIEs. The Company has determined that it was the primary
beneficiary of each of the VIEs and, as such, these entities
were consolidated into the Companys financial statements.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company operated 12 radio
stations under local marketing agreements, which were owned and
licensed to 5 entities qualifying as VIEs. For 2004, the 20
stations operated under LMAs during the year contributed
$10.2 million to the consolidated net revenues of the
Company.
F-9
The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of
accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, and related interpretations including FASB
Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain
Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of
APB Opinion No. 25, issued in March 2000, to account
for its fixed plan stock options. Under this method,
compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if
the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the
exercise price of the stock option. SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, established
accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation
plans. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, the Company has
elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of
accounting described above, and has adopted only the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 123. The following table
illustrates the pro forma effect on net income (loss)
attributable to common stockholders if the fair value-based
method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards
in each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), as reported
|
|
$ |
30,369 |
|
|
$ |
5,041 |
|
|
$ |
(92,753 |
) |
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net
income (loss)
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
Deduct: Total stock based compensation expense determined under
fair value based method
|
|
|
(12,527 |
) |
|
|
(12,914 |
) |
|
|
(14,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
17,467 |
|
|
|
(7,383 |
) |
|
|
(106,647 |
) |
|
Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends, accretion of
discount, and redemption premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,908 |
|
|
|
27,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
17,467 |
|
|
$ |
(9,291 |
) |
|
$ |
(133,961 |
) |
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.46 |
) |
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.46 |
) |
The per share weighted average fair value of options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was
$19.38, $9.95 and $7.85, respectively. The fair value of each
option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions used for grants:
|
|
|
2004 Option Grants: expected volatility of 51.2% for 2004;
risk-free interest rate of 4.46%; dividend yield of 0% and
expected lives of four years from the date of grant. |
|
|
2003 Option Grants: expected volatility of 38.4% for 2003;
risk-free interest rate of 4.25%; dividend yield of 0% and
expected lives of four years from the date of grant. |
|
|
2002 Option Grants: expected volatility of 66.6% for 2002;
risk-free interest rate of 4.01%; dividend yield of 0% and
expected lives of four years from the date of grant. |
Effective July 1, 2005, the Company expects to adopt the
provisions of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, which is described in the New Accounting
Pronouncements section that follows. Management anticipates that
when the new standard is adopted, the standard will impact the
Companys financial position and results of operations.
F-10
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
|
|
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
SFAS No. 144 provides a single accounting model for
long-lived assets to be disposed of. SFAS No. 144 also
changes the criteria for classifying an asset as held for sale;
and broadens the scope of businesses to be disposed of that
qualify for reporting as discontinued operations and changes the
timing of recognizing losses on such operations. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 144 on January 1, 2002.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets,
such as property and equipment and purchased intangibles subject
to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be
held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount
of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected
to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset
exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed
of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and
reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less
costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and
liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale
would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and
liability sections of the balance sheet.
Goodwill and intangible assets not subject to amortization are
tested annually for impairment, and are tested for impairment
more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the
asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the
extent that the carrying amount exceeds the assets fair
value.
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income,
establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income.
Comprehensive income includes net income as currently reported
under accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, and also considers the effect of additional
economic events that are not required to be reported in
determining net income, but rather are reported as a separate
component of stockholders equity. The Company reports
changes in the fair value of derivatives qualifying as cash flow
hedges as a component of comprehensive income.
Basic and diluted loss per share are computed in accordance with
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic income
(loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income
(loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of
outstanding stock options and warrants using the treasury
stock method.
F-11
|
|
|
Fair Values of Financial Instruments |
The carrying values of receivables, payables, and accrued
expenses approximate fair value due to the short maturity of
these instruments. The carrying value of the Companys long
term debt approximates its fair value.
|
|
|
New Accounting Pronouncements |
In September 2004, the SEC staff announced guidance on the use
of the residual method to value acquired intangible assets other
than goodwill in a business combination (EITF Topic D-108).
The SEC concluded that the residual method does not comply with
the requirements of SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations. Instead, a direct value method should be used
to determine the fair value of all intangible assets required
under SFAS No. 141. Similarly, impairment testing of
intangible assets should not rely on a residual method and
instead, should comply with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material
effect on the Companys position, results of operations or
cash flows.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to
recognize in the statement of operations all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, based on their fair values. Accounting for share-based
compensation transactions using the intrinsic method
supplemented by pro forma disclosures will no longer be
permissible. The Company will be required to implement
SFAS 123R for the interim reporting period beginning
July 1, 2005. The Company has not yet completed its
analysis of the impact of adopting SFAS 123R and is
therefore currently unable to quantify the future effect on its
financial statements. However, the adoption of this new
statement will have a significant impact on the results of
operations of the Company, as the Company will be required to
expense the fair value of all share based payments.
Amounts in the 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation.
|
|
2. |
Acquisitions and Dispositions |
As of December 31, 2004, the Company was a party to various
agreements to acquire 13 stations across 7 markets. The
aggregate purchase price of those pending acquisitions is
expected to be approximately $81.6 million, of which
$2.6 million had been funded as of December 31, 2004
in the form of escrow deposits. Of the $79.0 million to be
funded upon closing of the transactions, the Company may, at its
option, pay up to $70.3 million of the purchase price in
shares of Class A Common Stock.
Periodically, the FCC makes FM frequencies available for
acquisition through an auction process. On November 3,
2004, the FCC held an auction for approximately 290 frequencies,
located mostly in remote areas of the country, in which we
actively participated. As of the close of the auction, we were
the winning bidder for seven frequencies and are obligated to
pay the FCC $8.6 million. As of December 31, 2004, we
had funded $2.2 million toward our obligation to the FCC in
the form of an escrow deposit, to be applied by the FCC to the
bid price upon grant of the final authorization for the
frequencies. These seven authorizations will enable us to add a
station to seven of our existing markets once constructed.
Escrow funds of approximately $4.8 million and
$1.0 million paid by the Company in connection with pending
acquisitions and the FCC auction have been classified as other
assets at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
F-12
We completed the acquisition of 25 radio stations and a tract of
land for a tower site during the year ended December 31,
2004. Of the $93.7 million required to fund these
acquisitions, $11.0 million was paid in cash,
$71.3 million was paid in the form of shares of
Class A Common Stock, $5.2 million was deferred beyond
the closing of the transactions, $1.4 million represented
capitalizable acquisition costs and $4.8 million had been
previously funded as escrow deposits on the pending
acquisitions. These aggregate acquisition amounts include the
assets acquired pursuant to the select transactions highlighted
below.
|
|
|
Rochester, Minnesota and Sioux Falls, South Dakota |
On March 29, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of
Southern Minnesota Broadcasting Co. (SMB), which
owned and operated three radio stations serving Rochester,
Minnesota (KROC-AM, KROC-FM, KYBA-FM) and six radio stations
serving Sioux Falls, South Dakota (KYBB-FM, KIKN-FM, KKLS-FM,
KMXC-FM, KSOO-AM, KXRB-AM). In acquiring SMB, the Company issued
the former owners 3,223,978 shares of Class A Common
Stock and deferred $5.0 million of the purchase price
beyond the closing of the transaction. Also in connection with
the acquisition the Company paid $0.5 million in
capitalizable acquisition costs. The Rochester, Minnesota and
Sioux Falls, South Dakota stations were primarily acquired as
they complemented the Companys station portfolio and
increase its presence in the midwest region of the United States.
In connection with the SMB transaction, a deferred tax liability
was recognized due to a difference between the fair market
values and tax bases of the assets and liabilities acquired. The
calculated fair values of the related broadcast licenses
acquired in the stock acquisition were not large enough to
offset the recognized deferred tax liabilities and, as a result,
the Company recorded $29.0 million of goodwill. This
goodwill is not expected to be deductible for income tax
purposes.
On July 30, 2004, the Company completed the acquisition of
WBWR-FM, WBRW-FM, WFNR-FM, WFNR-AM, WPSK-FM, WRAD-AM and WWBU-FM
serving Blacksburg, Virginia from New River Valley Radio
Partners, L.L.C. In connection with the acquisition, the Company
paid $2.1 million in cash, deferred $0.1 million
beyond closing of the transaction and paid $0.2 million in
capitalizable acquisition costs. $4.7 million of the
purchase price had been previously funded in 2003 in the form of
an escrow deposit. The Blacksburg, Virginia stations were
primarily acquired as they complemented the Companys
station portfolio and increased both its state and regional
coverage of the United States.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded
$1.4 million of goodwill, all of which is expected to be
fully deductible for tax purposes.
F-13
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with all
of the 2004 acquisitions (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, other than cash
|
|
$ |
2,210 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
10,262 |
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
2,536 |
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
50 |
|
Unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadcast licenses
|
|
|
78,125 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
30,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
123,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
Long term liabilities
|
|
|
(1,509 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(28,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(30,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
93,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
The non-compete agreement acquired in 2004 has a useful life of
5 years.
We completed the acquisition of 25 radio stations during the
year ended December 31, 2003. Of the $184.7 million
required to fund these acquisitions, $133.6 million was
paid in cash, $38.5 million was paid in the form of shares
of Class A Common Stock (2,097,418 shares),
$10.0 million was funded in the form of a promissory note,
$1.6 million represented capitalizable acquisition costs
and $1.0 million had been previously funded as escrow
deposits on the pending acquisitions. With regard to the
$10.0 million promissory note, the Company has the option
to repay the note with shares of the Companys Class A
Common Stock. These aggregate acquisition amounts include the
assets acquired pursuant to the transactions described below.
|
|
|
Ft. Walton Beach, Florida |
On January 10, 2003, we completed the acquisition of
WKSM-FM, WNCV-FM, WYZB-FM, WZNS-FM and WFTW-AM serving the
Ft. Walton Beach, Florida market (Arbitron market
rank #217) from East Mississippi Broadcasters, Inc. In
connection with the acquisition the Company paid approximately
$28.5 million in cash and 95,938 shares of
Class A Common Stock. This five-station cluster had been
operated by the Company under the terms of a local marketing
agreement since October 1, 2002.
On January 31, 2003, we completed the acquisition of
WDDO-AM, WDEN-AM, WAYS-FM, WMAC-AM, WDEN-FM, WPEZ-FM, WMKS-FM
and WMGB-FM serving the Macon, Georgia market (Arbitron market
rank #156) from U.S. Broadcasting Limited Partnership,
for approximately $35.5 million in cash. This eight-station
cluster had been operated by the Company under the terms of a
local marketing agreement since October 1, 2002.
On July 21, 2003, we completed the acquisition of WSM-FM
and WWTN-FM serving the Nashville, Tennessee market (Arbitron
market rank #45) from Gaylord Entertainment, for
$62.5 million in cash.
F-14
The addition of these two stations increased the Companys
position in the Nashville market to five stations. The two
stations acquired from Gaylord Entertainment had been operated
by the Company under the terms of a local marketing agreement
since April 21, 2003.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $7.1
million of goodwill, all of which is expected to be fully
deductible for tax purposes.
Also in connection with the Companys acquisition of WSM-FM
and WWTN-FM serving the Nashville, Tennessee market, the Company
also entered into a Joint Services Agreement (JSA)
related to a third radio station, WSM-AM. Under the terms of the
agreement, the Company will provide sales and marketing services
to the station for a period of five years and will retain all of
the revenues of the station. In return, the licensee of the
station received $2.5 million at the commencement date of
the agreement and will receive a monthly fee equal to a
percentage of the net revenues realized less certain selling
costs incurred by the Company. The Company calculated the fair
value of the JSA using a discounted cash flow approach and
determined that the $2.5 million of consideration paid was
an accurate measure of fair value. The value of the JSA will be
amortized over the five-year life of the agreement. As of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, $1.7 million and
$2.2 million, respectively, has been classified as current
and non current assets related to the JSA.
On July 22, 2003, we completed the acquisition of Athens
Broadcasting Company, Inc., which owned and operated WZYP-FM,
WUSX-FM, WVNN-AM and WUMP-AM serving the Huntsville, Alabama
market (Arbitron market rank #118). In connection with the
acquisition the Company issued to the former owners
1,215,760 shares of Class A Common Stock. In addition
to the station assets and FCC broadcast licenses, we received
approximately $2.5 million in working capital as part of
the transaction. This four-station cluster had been operated by
the Company under the terms of a local marketing agreement since
April 1, 2003.
In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded
$6.8 million of goodwill, which is not expected to be
deductible for tax purposes.
On December 18, 2003, we completed the acquisition of
KCHZ-FM and KMJK-FM, serving Kansas City, Missouri (Arbitron
market rank #29), from Syncom Radio Corporation and
Allur-Kansas City, Inc. In connection with the acquisition the
Company paid approximately $5.0 million in cash,
483,671 shares of Class A Common Stock and delivered a
$10.0 million promissory note. The promissory note was
subsequently repaid in cash in August 2004.
F-15
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with all
of the 2003 acquisitions (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, other than cash
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
8,796 |
|
Amortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-compete agreement
|
|
|
50 |
|
Unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadcast licenses
|
|
|
168,840 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
13,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
191,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(6,398 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(7,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
184,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
The non-compete agreement acquired in 2003 has a useful life of
3 years.
|
|
|
2002 Acquisitions and Dispositions |
We completed the acquisition of 35 radio stations during the
year ended December 31, 2002. Of the $348.2 million
required to fund these acquisitions, $205.0 million was
paid in the form of shares of Class A and Class B
Common Stock, $4.1 million was paid in the form of warrants
to purchase common stock, $132.3 million was funded in
cash, $2.9 million represented capitalizable acquisition
costs and $3.8 million had been previously funded as escrow
deposits on the pending acquisitions. These aggregate
acquisition amounts include the assets acquired pursuant to the
transactions described below.
|
|
|
Aurora Communications, LLC |
On March 28, 2002, the Company completed the acquisition of
Aurora Communications, LLC (Aurora), which owned and
operated 18 radio stations in Connecticut and New York. In
acquiring Aurora, the Company issued to the former owners
(1) 10,551,182 shares of common stock, consisting of
1,606,843 shares of Class A Common Stock and
8,944,339 shares of Class B Common Stock and,
(2) warrants, exercisable until March 28, 2003, to
purchase up to an aggregate of 833,333 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $12.00 per share, and paid
$93.0 million in cash. The Company also paid approximately
$1.0 million in capitalizable acquisition costs in
connection with the acquisition. As a result of this
acquisition, the Company increased its presence in the northeast
region of the United States and provided itself with an
entrée into the strategically vital metropolitan New York
City markets.
An affiliate of BA Capital Company, L.P. (BA
Capital), one of our principal stockholders, owned a
majority of the equity of Aurora, and received approximately
8.9 million shares of nonvoting Class B Common Stock
of Cumulus in the acquisition. Those shares may be converted
into shares of Class A Common Stock at the option of the
holder subject to FCC regulations, and automatically convert
into shares of Class A Common Stock upon their transfer to
another party. BA Capital owned approximately
840,000 shares of Cumulus publicly traded
Class A Common Stock, and approximately 2 million
shares of Cumulus nonvoting Class B Common Stock
prior to the consummation of the acquisition.
During 2003 and 2002, certain former owners of Aurora exercised
warrants to purchase 723,238 and 89,078 shares of
Class A Common Stock, respectively. Proceeds to the Company
totaled approximately $8.7 million and $1.1 million
during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Additional warrants to
purchase 21,017 shares of common stock, issued to
owners of Aurora, were not exercised and
F-16
expired on March 28, 2003. As of December 31, 2003, no
warrants issued in the Aurora transaction remained outstanding.
In connection with the acquisition of Aurora, the Company
entered into an escrow agreement pursuant to which the Company
issued 770,000 shares of Class A Common Stock into an
escrow account. Following the consummation of the acquisition on
March 28, 2002, the shares placed in escrow were released
back to the Company and subsequently canceled.
The following table details the aggregate purchase price of the
Aurora acquisition (dollars in thousands, except for share and
per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration | |
Consideration |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Value/Share |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Class A common stock
|
|
|
1,606,843 shares |
|
|
$11.85/share |
|
$ |
19,041 |
|
Class B common stock
|
|
|
8,944,339 shares |
|
|
$11.85/share |
|
|
105,990 |
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
833,333 shares |
|
|
$3.51/share |
|
|
2,925 |
|
Cash and acquisition costs
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
93,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
221,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value per share of the common stock issued in that
acquisition was determined based on the average market price of
the Companys common stock over a two-day period before and
after the terms of the acquisition were agreed to and announced.
The fair value of the warrant was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the
Aurora acquisition (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, other than cash
|
|
$ |
6,129 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
10,051 |
|
Unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadcast licenses
|
|
|
220,222 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
26,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
262,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,299 |
) |
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(38,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(40,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
221,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
All of the $220.2 million in acquired intangible assets was
assigned to the broadcast licenses of the stations. Fair value
of these intangibles was determined by management using a
discounted cash flow approach. The $26.4 million residual
purchase price consideration above the fair value of the
tangible and intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill.
Also on March 28, 2002, the Company completed the
acquisition of the broadcasting operations of DBBC, L.L.C.
(DBBC), which owned and operated 3 radio stations in
Nashville, Tennessee. In acquiring the broadcasting operations
of DBBC, the Company issued to DBBC
(1) 5,250,000 shares of the Companys
Class A Common Stock and (2) warrants, exercisable
until September 28, 2002, to purchase up to
250,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$12.00 per share and paid $21.0 million in cash. As a
result of this transaction, the Company acquired three radio
stations in Nashville, Tennessee,
F-17
Arbitron ranked metro #44. The DBBC acquisition increases
the Companys station portfolio and marks the
Companys entry into the top tier Arbitron rank 50+ markets.
DBBC, LLC is principally controlled by Lewis W.
Dickey, Jr., the Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Cumulus, John W. Dickey, Executive Vice President of
Cumulus, and their brothers David W. Dickey and Michael W.
Dickey.
On September 28, 2002, DBBC exercised its warrants to
purchase 250,000 shares of Class A Common Stock.
Proceeds to the Company totaled $3.0 million.
The following table details the aggregate purchase price of the
DBBC acquisition (dollars in thousands, except for share and per
share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration | |
Consideration |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Value/Share |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Class A common stock
|
|
|
5,250,000 shares |
|
|
$15.23/share |
|
$ |
79,931 |
|
Warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
250,000 shares |
|
|
$4.82/share |
|
|
1,206 |
|
Cash and acquisition costs
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
20,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
102,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value per share of the common stock issued in that
acquisition was determined based on the average market price of
the Companys common stock over a two-day period before and
after the terms of the acquisition were agreed to and announced.
The fair value of the warrant was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the
DBBC acquisition (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets, other than cash
|
|
$ |
1,625 |
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
3,161 |
|
Unamortized intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadcast licenses
|
|
|
76,700 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
45,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
127,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(620 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(24,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(25,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
102,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
All of the $76.7 million in acquired intangible assets was
assigned to the broadcast licenses of the stations acquired.
Fair value of these intangibles was determined by management
using a discounted cash flow approach. The $45.7 million
residual purchase price consideration above the fair value of
the tangible and intangible assets acquired was recorded as
goodwill.
During 2002, the Company completed the sale of ten stations in
three markets and received approximately $8.8 million in
cash. In connection with these transactions, the Company
recorded gains of $5.4 million, which are presented in
other income, net in the accompanying statement of operations
for the year ended December 31, 2002.
All of the Companys acquisitions have been accounted for
by the purchase method of accounting. As such, the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets include the acquired assets and
liabilities and the accompanying statements of operations
include the results of operations of the acquired entities from
their respective dates of acquisition. The accompanying
consolidated statements of operations include the results of
operations of divested entities through the dates of disposition.
F-18
The unaudited consolidated condensed pro forma results of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 2004 and
2003, reflect adjustments as if all acquisitions and
dispositions completed had occurred on January 1, 2003,
follow (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Unaudited) | |
|
(Unaudited) | |
Net revenues
|
|
$ |
323,243 |
|
|
$ |
303,737 |
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
81,695 |
|
|
$ |
70,690 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
33,758 |
|
|
$ |
10,711 |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
33,758 |
|
|
$ |
8,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Diluted income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
As of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company
operated 12, 4 and 17 stations under LMAs respectively. The
statements of operations for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 include the revenue and broadcast operating
expenses of these radio stations and any related fees associated
with the LMA from the effective date of the LMA through the
earlier of the acquisition date or December 31.
|
|
3. |
Restructuring and Impairment Charges (Credits) |
During June 2000 the Company implemented two separate
Board-approved restructuring programs. During the second quarter
of 2000, the Company recorded a $9.3 million charge to
operating expenses related to the restructuring costs.
The June 2000 restructuring programs were the result of
Board-approved mandates to discontinue the operations of Cumulus
Internet Services and to centralize the Companys corporate
and administrative organization and employees in Atlanta,
Georgia. The programs included severance and related costs and
costs for vacated leased facilities, impaired leasehold
improvements at vacated leased facilities, and impaired assets
related to the Internet businesses. As of June 30, 2001,
the Company had completed the restructuring programs. The
remaining portion of the unpaid balance as of that date
represented lease obligations and various contractual
obligations for services related to the Internet business and
have been paid by the Company through the present day consistent
with the contracted terms.
During 2002, the Company successfully negotiated and executed
sublease agreements for a majority of the vacated corporate
office space in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Chicago, Illinois. As a
result, during the year ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, the Company reversed $0.1 million, $0.3 million
and $1.0 million, respectively, of the remaining liability
related to lease obligations. The amount reversed in each period
represents the Companys estimate of the reduction of the
remaining lease obligations as a result of offsetting
contractual sublease income. The reversal of liability related
to the subleases has been presented in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations as a component of restructuring and
impairment charges (credits), consistent with the presentation
of the original restructuring charge.
F-19
The following table presents the restructuring liability at
December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and the related
activity applied to the balances for the year ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability | |
|
Liability | |
|
|
|
Liability | |
|
Liability | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Utilized in | |
|
Reversed in | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Utilized in | |
|
Reversed in | |
|
December 31, | |
Expense Category |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Lease termination costs office relocation
|
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
|
$ |
(162 |
) |
|
$ |
(919 |
) |
|
$ |
764 |
|
|
$ |
(167 |
) |
|
$ |
(276 |
) |
|
$ |
321 |
|
Accrued internet contractual obligations
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
Internet lease termination costs
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring liability totals
|
|
$ |
2,509 |
|
|
$ |
(302 |
) |
|
$ |
(971 |
) |
|
$ |
1,236 |
|
|
$ |
(198 |
) |
|
$ |
(334 |
) |
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability | |
|
Liability | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Utilized in | |
|
Reversed in | |
|
December 31, | |
Expense Category |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Lease termination costs office relocation
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
$ |
(189 |
) |
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
$ |
59 |
|
Accrued internet contractual obligations
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
Internet lease termination costs
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring liability totals
|
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding restructuring liability amounts have been presented
as a component of current liabilities in the accompanying
balance sheets.
|
|
4. |
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment consists of the following as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land
|
|
|
|
$ |
10,667 |
|
|
$ |
8,250 |
|
Broadcasting and other equipment
|
|
3 to 7 years |
|
|
120,839 |
|
|
|
105,222 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
5 years |
|
|
11,427 |
|
|
|
11,079 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
5 years |
|
|
8,494 |
|
|
|
7,152 |
|
Buildings
|
|
20 years |
|
|
25,706 |
|
|
|
22,507 |
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
2,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179,463 |
|
|
|
157,152 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
(86,257 |
) |
|
|
(66,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,206 |
|
|
$ |
91,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
5. |
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
The following tables summarize the December 31, 2004 and
2003 gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of
amortized and unamortized intangible assets, amortization
expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002, and the estimated amortization expense for the 5
succeeding fiscal years (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Amortized Intangible Assets: Non-Compete Agreements Gross
Carrying Value
|
|
$ |
3,850 |
|
|
$ |
3,800 |
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(2,869 |
) |
|
|
(2,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Value
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
1,772 |
|
Unamortized Intangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licenses for Digital Broadcasting Technology
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FCC Broadcast Licenses
|
|
|
1,130,555 |
|
|
|
1,052,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,131,755 |
|
|
|
1,052,429 |
|
Aggregate Amortization Expense for Non-Compete Agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
918 |
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
935 |
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Amortization Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ending December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ending December 31, 2006
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ending December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ending December 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ending December 31, 2009
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 follow (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill | |
|
|
| |
Balance as of December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
231,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
13,912 |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2003
|
|
$ |
245,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
30,552 |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
276,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licenses for Digital Broadcasting Technology |
On December 21, 2004, the Company purchased 240 perpetual
licenses from iBiquity Digital Corporation
(iBiquity) for $1.2 million in cash. These
licenses permit the Company to convert to and utilize
iBiquitys digital broadcasting technology, which will
allow the Company to broadcast in a digital format on 240 of its
stations.
Under the agreement with iBiquity, the Company is obligated to
convert the 240 stations to a digital technology over a
seven-year period, with the first ten stations to be converted
by December 31, 2005.
F-21
Each station conversion will require an investment in certain
capital equipment necessary to broadcast the technology.
SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to test FCC
broadcast licenses for impairment on an annual basis and more
frequently if events or circumstances indicate that the asset
may be impaired. The Company performs its annual impairment
evaluation of existing intangible assets with indefinite lives
during the fourth quarter of each year. Accordingly, the Company
determines the appropriate reporting unit and then compares the
carrying amount of each reporting units broadcast licenses
with its fair value. Consistent with prior years, for 2004 the
Company determined the reporting unit as a radio market.
The fair value of broadcast licenses was determined primarily by
using a discounted cash flows approach. The fair values derived
include assumptions that contain a variety of variables. These
variables are based on available industry data, historical
experience and estimates of future performance and include, but
are not limited to, revenue and expense growth rates for each
radio market, revenue and expense growth rates for the
Companys stations in each market, overall discount rates
based on the Companys weighted average cost of capital and
acquisition multiples. The assumptions used in estimating the
fair values of broadcast licenses are based on currently
available data and managements best estimates and,
accordingly, a change in market conditions or other factors
could have a significant effect on the estimated value.
For the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company
determined that the fair values of each reporting units
broadcast licenses exceeded their carrying values and, as a
result, no impairment existed.
In 2002 and in connection with the Companys transitional
impairment evaluation of existing intangible assets with
indefinite lives, consisting entirely of radio station broadcast
licenses, the Company recognized an impairment charge to
write-off intangible assets in the amount of $41.7 million,
net of an income tax benefit of $15.5 million. The
impairment loss is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations under the caption Cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle, net of tax. The Company completed
its 2002 annual impairment evaluation of existing intangible
assets with indefinite lives during the fourth quarter of 2002.
The fair values of all broadcast licenses exceeded their
carrying values and, as a result, no impairment existed.
SFAS No. 142 requires the Company to test goodwill for
impairment on an annual basis and more frequently if events or
circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. The
Company performs its annual test in the fourth quarter of each
year and, in doing so, requires that the Company determine the
appropriate reporting unit and compare the fair value of the
reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the fair value of
any reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, an
indication exists that the amount of goodwill attributed to the
reporting unit may be impaired and the Company is required to
perform a second step of the impairment test. In the second
step, the Company compares the implied fair value of each
reporting units goodwill, determined by allocating the
reporting units fair value to all of its assets and
liabilities, to the carrying amount of the reporting unit.
Consistent with prior years, for 2004 the Company determined the
reporting unit as a radio market.
The fair value of reporting units was determined primarily by
using a discounted cash flows approach. The fair values derived
include assumptions that contain a variety of variables. These
variables are based on industry data, historical experience and
estimates of future performance and include, but are not limited
to, revenue and expense growth rates for each radio market,
revenue and expense growth rates for the Companys stations
in each market, overall discount rates based on the
Companys weighted average cost of capital and acquisition
multiples. The assumptions used in estimating the fair values of
goodwill are based on currently available data and
managements best estimates and, accordingly, a change in
market conditions or other factors could have a significant
effect on the estimated values.
F-22
For the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company
determined that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded
their carrying values and, as a result, no impairment existed.
The Company completed its transitional impairment evaluation of
goodwill during the second quarter of 2002. The fair values of
all reporting units (as of January 1, 2002) exceeded their
carrying values and, as a result, no impairment existed. The
Company completed its 2002 annual impairment evaluation of
goodwill in the fourth quarter of 2002. The fair values of all
reporting units exceeded their carrying values and, as a result,
no impairment existed.
|
|
6. |
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
2,108 |
|
|
$ |
3,843 |
|
Accrued compensation
|
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
Accrued royalties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
Accrued commissions
|
|
|
2,994 |
|
|
|
2,585 |
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
910 |
|
Barter payable
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
1,947 |
|
Due to seller of acquired companies
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
Accrued restructuring costs
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
Accrued employee benefits
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
Accrued acquisition liabilities
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
19,078 |
|
|
$ |
21,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Derivative Instruments |
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in
accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This standard
requires the Company to recognize all derivatives on the balance
sheet at fair value. Fair value changes are recorded in income
for any contracts not classified as qualifying hedging
instruments. For derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedge
instruments, the effective portion of the derivative fair value
change must be recorded through other comprehensive income, a
component of stockholders equity.
The Company entered into a LIBOR-based interest rate swap
arrangement in March of 2003 to manage fluctuations in cash
flows resulting from interest rate risk attributable to changes
in the benchmark interest rate of LIBOR. The interest rate swap
changes the variable-rate cash flow exposure on the credit
facility to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into a
receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swap. Under the
interest rate swap, Cumulus receives LIBOR-based variable
interest rate payments and makes fixed interest rate payments,
thereby creating fixed-rate long-term debt. This swap agreement
is accounted for as a qualifying cash flow hedge of the future
variable-rate interest payments in accordance with
SFAS No. 133, whereby changes in the fair market value
are reflected as adjustments to the fair value of the derivative
instrument as reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
The fair value of the interest rate swap agreement is determined
periodically by obtaining quotations from the financial
institution that is the counterparty to the Companys swap
arrangement. The fair value represents an estimate of the net
amount that Cumulus would receive if the agreement was
transferred to another party or cancelled as of the date of the
valuation. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate
F-23
swap are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, or
AOCI, which is an element of stockholders equity. These
amounts are subsequently reclassified into interest expense as a
yield adjustment in the same period in which the related
interest on the floating-rate debt obligations affects earnings.
During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
approximately $1.8 million and $2.0 million,
respectively, related to the interest rate swap was reported as
interest expense and represent a yield adjustment of the hedged
debt obligation. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2004
and 2003 reflect other long-term assets of $3.9 million and
$1.5 million, respectively, to reflect the fair value of
the swap agreement.
In order to affect the lowest fixed rate under the swap
arrangement, Cumulus also entered into an interest rate option
agreement, which provides for the counterparty to the agreement,
Bank of America, to unilaterally extend the period of the swap
for two additional years, from March of 2006 through March of
2008. This option may only be exercised in March of 2006. This
instrument is not highly effective in mitigating the risks in
cash flows, and therefore is deemed speculative and its changes
in value are accounted for as a current element of operating
results. Interest expense for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003 include $0.4 million and $0.6 million,
respectively, of net gains which increased the fair value of the
option agreement. The balance sheet as of December 31, 2004
and 2003 reflect other long-term liabilities of
$0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, to
reflect the fair value of the option agreement. This amount
represents the ineffectiveness of this instrument in effectively
managing cash flow risk.
The Companys long-term debt consists of the following at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Term loan and revolving credit facilities at 4.15%
and 3.6%, respectively
|
|
$ |
482,102 |
|
|
$ |
477,344 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482,102 |
|
|
|
487,344 |
|
Less: Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(40,957 |
) |
|
|
(27,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
441,145 |
|
|
$ |
460,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the future maturities of long-term debt follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
40,957 |
|
2006
|
|
|
43,490 |
|
2007
|
|
|
43,491 |
|
2008
|
|
|
43,491 |
|
2009
|
|
|
237,241 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
73,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
482,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
On January 29, 2004 the Company completed an amendment and
restatement of its existing credit agreement governing its
credit facility (the Credit Facility), which reduced
the margin applicable to both Alternative Base Rate and Adjusted
LIBO Rate borrowings under its $325.0 million eight-year
term loan facility. The January 29, 2004 amendment and
restatement did not change any other material terms or
restrictive covenants under the credit agreement. In connection
with the amendment and restatement, the Company incurred
$0.5 million of professional fees, which have been included
in losses on early extinguishment of debt on the consolidated
statements of operations.
F-24
On July 15, 2004 the Company completed another amendment
and restatement of its existing Credit Agreement. Under the
terms of this amendment and restatement, $100.0 million of
principal outstanding under the eight-year term loan facility
was retired and simultaneously redrawn under the seven-year term
loan facility. In the aggregate there were no changes in amounts
outstanding under the Credit Facility as a result of the
amendment and restatement. The amendment and restatement also
reduced by 0.5% the margin applicable to both Alternate Base
Rate and Adjusted LIBO Rate borrowings under both the seven-year
and eight-year term loan facilities. In addition, certain
financial restrictive covenants were amended as a part of the
amendment and restatement, which generally give the Company
greater flexibility during fiscal years 2004 and 2005. The terms
of the seven-year revolving commitment were not amended. In
connection with the amendment and restatement of the Credit
Agreement, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishments
of debt of $2.1 million, which was comprised of a
$1.5 million write-off of previously capitalized debt
issuance costs and $0.6 million of legal and professional
fees.
On November 18, 2004, the Company again completed an
amendment and restatement of its existing Credit Agreement (as
amended and restated, the Credit Agreement), which,
among other things provided for (a) an increase in the
existing revolving credit facility of $75.0 million to an
aggregate principal amount of $181.9 million and (b) a
new eight year term loan facility in the aggregate principal
amount of $75.0 million. The amendment and restatement also
provided for an increase in the amount of cash proceeds that may
be used to purchase shares of the Companys Class A
Common Stock from $15.0 million to $100.0 million and
new parameters for the Companys required Total Leverage
Ratio and Senior Leverage Ratio (each as defined by the Credit
Agreement).
The Credit Facility consists of a seven-year revolving
commitment of $181.9 million, a seven-year term loan
facility of $202.7 million, an eight-year term loan
facility of $220.9 million and an eight year term loan
facility of $75.0 million. The amount available under the
seven-year revolving commitment will be automatically reduced by
17.5% of the initial aggregate principal amount
($181.9 million) in fiscal year 2006, 33.0% in fiscal year
2007, 37.0% in fiscal 2008 and 12.5% in fiscal year 2009. During
2004, the Company made scheduled principal payments of
$20.8 million on the seven-year term loan facility and
$2.9 million on the eight-year term loan facilities. In
connection with various acquisitions completed in 2004, the
Company drew down a total of $21.5 million under its
seven-year revolving loan commitment and subsequently repaid
$20.5 million of those borrowings during the year.
Outstanding revolving loan borrowings of $47.5 million as
of November 18, 2004 were repaid with the proceeds of the
$75.0 million eight year term loan borrowing funded on that
date. As of December 31, 2004, $187.5 million was
outstanding under the seven-year term loan facility and
$294.6 million was outstanding under the eight-year term
loan facilities.
The Companys obligations under the Credit Facility are
secured by a pledge of substantially all of its assets in which
a security interest may lawfully be granted (including FCC
licenses held by its subsidiaries), including, without
limitation, intellectual property, real property, and all of the
capital stock of the Companys direct and indirect domestic
subsidiaries (except the capital stock of BSI) and 65% of the
capital stock of any first-tier foreign subsidiary. The
obligations under the Credit Facility are also guaranteed by
each of the direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, except
BSI, and are required to be guaranteed by any additional
subsidiaries acquired by the Company.
Both the revolving commitment and the term loan borrowings under
the Credit Facility bear interest, at the Companys option,
at a rate equal to the Alternate Base Rate (as defined under the
terms of our Credit Agreement, 5.25% as of December 31,
2004) plus a margin ranging between 0.25% to 0.75%, or the
Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined under the terms of the Credit
Agreement, 2.44% as of December 31, 2004) plus a margin
ranging between 1.25% to 1.75% (in each case dependent upon the
leverage ratio of the Company). At December 31, 2004 the
Companys effective interest rate, excluding the interest
rate swap agreement discussed below, on loan amounts outstanding
under the Credit Facility was 4.15%.
In March 2003, the Company entered into an interest rate swap
agreement that effectively fixed the interest rate, based on
LIBOR, on $300.0 million of its current floating rate bank
borrowings for a three-
F-25
year period. As a result and including the fixed component of
the swap, at December 31, 2004, the Companys
effective interest rate on loan amounts outstanding under the
Credit Facility is 3.88%.
A commitment fee calculated at a rate ranging from 0.50% to
0.75% per annum (depending upon the Companys
utilization rate) of the average daily amount available under
the revolving lines of credit is payable quarterly in arrears,
and fees in respect of letters of credit issued under the Credit
Agreement equal to the interest rate margin then applicable to
Eurodollar Rate loans under the seven-year revolving credit
facility are payable quarterly in arrears. In addition, a
fronting fee of 0.25% is payable quarterly to the issuing bank.
The seven-year term loan borrowings are repayable in quarterly
installments. The remaining scheduled annual amortization is
$38.0 million for fiscal 2005, $40.5 million for each
of fiscal 2006, 2007 and 2008 and $27.9 million for fiscal
2009. The eight-year term loans are also repayable in quarterly
installments. The scheduled annual amortization is
$3.0 million in each of fiscal years 2005, 2006, 2007,
2008, $209.4 million in fiscal 2009 and $73.4 million
in fiscal 2010. The amount available under the seven-year
revolving commitment will be automatically reduced in quarterly
installments as described above and in the Credit Agreement.
Certain mandatory prepayments of the term loan facilities and
reductions in the availability of the revolving commitment are
required to be made including: (i) 100% of the net proceeds
from the incurrence of certain indebtedness; and (ii) 100%
of the net proceeds from certain asset sales.
Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company is subject
to certain restrictive financial and operating covenants,
including but not limited to maximum leverage covenants, minimum
interest and fixed charge coverage covenants, limitations on
asset dispositions and the payment of dividends. The failure to
comply with the covenants would result in an event of default,
which in turn would permit acceleration of debt under the Credit
Agreement. At December 31, 2004, the Company was in
compliance with such financial and operating covenants.
The terms of the Credit Agreement contain events of default
after expiration of applicable grace periods, including failure
to make payments on the Credit Facility, breach of covenants,
breach of representations and warranties, invalidity of the
Credit Agreement and related documents, cross default under
other agreements or conditions relating to indebtedness of the
Company or its restricted subsidiaries, certain events of
liquidation, moratorium, insolvency, bankruptcy or similar
events, enforcement of security, certain litigation or other
proceedings, and certain events relating to changes in control.
Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the terms of
the Credit Agreement, the majority of the lenders are able to
declare all amounts under our Credit Facility to be due and
payable and take certain other actions, including enforcement of
rights in respect of the collateral. The majority of the banks
extending credit under each term loan facility and the majority
of the banks under each revolving credit facility may terminate
such term loan facility and such revolving credit facility,
respectively, upon an event of default.
Debt issuance costs are being amortized as interest expense over
eight years for the Credit Facility.
We had previously issued a $10.0 million promissory note in
2003 in connection with the acquisition of radio stations in
Kansas City, Missouri. The Company prepaid the note in its
entirety in August 2004.
We had previously issued $160.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of our Notes. During the fourth quarter of 2002
and the first quarter of 2003, the Company completed the
repurchase of $57.5 million in aggregate principal of the
Notes. Related to the $30.1 million in aggregate principal
of the Notes purchased during the first quarter of 2003, the
Company paid a premium of $2.4 million. In April 2003, the
Company completed a tender offer and consent solicitation
relating to its outstanding Notes. In the tender offer,
$88.8 million in principal amount of the Notes were
repurchased by the Company and canceled, leaving
$13.7 million of the Notes outstanding. Pursuant to the
consent solicitation, substantially all of the restrictive
covenants in the indenture governing the Notes were eliminated.
As permitted by the terms of indenture governing the Notes, the
Company called for and completed the redemption of all of the
outstanding Notes on July 3, 2003. The Notes were redeemed
at a redemption price of 105.188% of the principal amount
($0.7 million in redemption premium), plus accrued interest
through July 2, 2003. During 2003, the Company wrote-off
$3.0 million of debt issuance costs, $0.2 million in
professional fees
F-26
and $9.1 million in redemption premiums related to these
repurchases of the Notes, which are included in losses on early
extinguishment of debt on the consolidated statements of
operations.
|
|
9. |
Redeemable Preferred Stock |
We issued $125.0 million of our Series A Preferred
Stock in our initial public offerings on July 1, 1998. The
holders of the Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to
receive cumulative dividends at an annual rate equal to 13 3/4%
of the liquidation preference per share of Series A
Preferred Stock, payable quarterly, in arrears. On or before
July 1, 2003, we could have, at our option, paid dividends
in cash or in additional fully paid and non-assessable shares of
Series A Preferred Stock. From July 1, 1998 until
March 31, 2002, we issued an additional $41.9 million
of shares of Series A Preferred Stock as dividends on the
Series A Preferred Stock. Prior to the redemption of all of
the outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock on
July 7, 2003, as discussed below, all of the dividends on
the Series A Preferred Stock were paid in shares, except
for (1) a $3.5 million cash dividend paid on
January 1, 2000 to holders of record on December 15,
1999 for the period commencing October 1, 1999 and ending
December 31, 1999, (2) a $4.6 million cash
dividend paid on April 2, 2002 to holders of record on
March 15, 2002 for the period commencing January 1,
2002 and ending March 31, 2002, (3) a
$4.6 million cash dividend paid on June 28, 2002 to
holders of record on June 14, 2002 for the period
commencing April 1, 2002 and ending June 30, 2002,
(4) a $2.6 million cash dividend paid on
October 1, 2002 to holders of record on September 15,
2002 for the period commencing on July 1, 2002 and ending
September 30, 2002, (5) a $0.5 million cash
dividend paid on January 2, 2003 to holders of record on
December 15, 2002 for the period commencing on
October 1, 2002 and ending December 31, 2002,
(6) a $0.3 million cash dividend paid on April 1,
2003 to holders of record on March 15, 2003 for the period
commencing on January 1, 2003 and ending March 31,
2003 and (7) a $0.3 million cash dividend paid on
July 1, 2003 to holders of record on June 15, 2003 for
the period commencing on April 1, 2003 and ending
June 30, 2003.
During the third and fourth quarter of 2002 and the first
quarter of 2003, the Company negotiated and completed the
repurchase of 125,221 shares of its Series A Preferred
Stock for $140.8 million in cash. The Company paid a
redemption premium of $0.6 million associated with the
repurchases of 4,900 shares during the first quarter of
2003. Total redemption premiums of $1.2 million has been
included as a component of preferred stock dividends and
redemption premiums in the accompanying Consolidated Statements
of Operations. On July 7, 2003 the Company completed the
redemption of the remaining 9,268 shares of the
Series A Preferred Stock and paid a redemption premium of
$0.6 million plus accrued dividends through July 6,
2003, all in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
stock designations governing the Series A Preferred Stock.
(a) Common Stock
Each share of Class A Common Stock entitles its holders to
one vote.
Except upon the occurrence of certain events, holders of the
Class B Common Stock are not entitled to vote. The
Class B Common Stock is convertible at any time, or from
time to time, at the option of the holder of such Class B
Common Stock (provided that the prior consent of any
governmental authority required to make such conversion lawful
shall have been obtained) without cost to such holder (except
any transfer taxes that may be payable if certificates are to be
issued in a name other than that in which the certificate
surrendered is registered), into Class A Common Stock on a
share-for-share basis; provided that the Board of Directors has
determined that the holder of Class A Common Stock at the
time of conversion would not disqualify the Company under, or
violate, any rules and regulations of the FCC.
Subject to certain exceptions, each share of Class C Common
Stock entitles its holders to ten votes. The Class C Common
Stock is convertible at any time, or from time to time, at the
option of the holder of such Class C Common Stock (provided
that the prior consent of any governmental authority required to
make such conversion lawful shall have been obtained) without
cost to such holder (except any transfer taxes that may be
payable if certificates are to be issued in a name other than
that in which the certificate
F-27
surrendered is registered), into Class A Common Stock on a
share-for-share basis; provided that the Board of Directors has
determined that the holder of Class A Common Stock at the
time of conversion would not disqualify the Company under, or
violate, any rules and regulations of the FCC.
(b) Share Repurchases
On September 28, 2004, the Board of Directors of the
Company authorized the purchase, from time to time, of up to
$100.0 million of its Class A Common Stock, subject to
the terms of the Credit Agreement.
In October 2004 and consistent with the Board approved
repurchase plan, the Company repurchased 1,004,429 shares
of its Class A Common Stock in the open market at an
average repurchase price of $14.56 per share. As of
December 31, 2004, net of shares repurchased and held in
treasury, the Company had 56,673,567 shares of Class A
Common Stock outstanding.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had authority to
repurchase an additional $85.4 million of the
Companys Class A Common Stock.
(c) Stock Purchase Plan
In 1999, the Companys Board of Directors adopted and the
Companys stockholders subsequently approved the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan is
designed to qualify for certain income tax benefits for
employees under the Section 423 of the Internal Revenue
Code. The plan allows qualifying employees to purchase
Class A Common Stock at the end of each calendar year,
commencing with the calendar year beginning January 1,
1999, at 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of the
Class A Common Stock on the first and last trading days of
the year. The amount each employee can purchase is limited to
the lesser of (i) 15% of pay or
(ii) $0.025 million of stock value on the first
trading day of the year. An employee must be employed at least
six months as of the first trading day of the year in order to
participate in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
In June 2002, the Companys stockholders approved an
amendment to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan which increased
the aggregate number of shares of Class A Common Stock
available for purchase under the plan from 1,000,000 shares
to 2,000,000, an increase of 1,000,000 shares.
The following table summarizes the number of shares of
Class A Common stock issued as a result of employee
participation in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan since its
inception in 1999 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A | |
|
|
Issue | |
|
Common Shares | |
Issue Date |
|
Price | |
|
Issued | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
January 10, 2000
|
|
$ |
14.18 |
|
|
|
17,674 |
|
January 17, 2001
|
|
$ |
3.08 |
|
|
|
50,194 |
|
January 8-23, 2002
|
|
$ |
3.1875 |
|
|
|
558,161 |
|
January 2-24, 2003
|
|
$ |
12.61 |
|
|
|
124,876 |
|
January 26-30, 2004
|
|
$ |
13.05 |
|
|
|
130,194 |
|
January 2-28, 2005
|
|
$ |
12.82 |
|
|
|
136,110 |
|
Following the issuance of shares in January 2005, related to the
2004 plan year, there remain 982,791 shares of Class A
Common Stock authorized and available under the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
2004 Equity Incentive Plan |
The Board of Directors adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan on
March 19, 2004. The 2004 Equity Incentive Plan was
subsequently approved by the Companys stockholders on
April 30, 2004. The purpose
F-28
of the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is to attract and retain
officers, key employees, non-employee directors and consultants
for the Company and its subsidiaries and to provide such persons
incentives and rewards for superior performance. The aggregate
number of shares of Class A Common Stock subject to the
2004 Equity Incentive Plan is 2,795,000. Of the aggregate number
of shares of Class A Common Stock available, up to
1,400,000 shares may be granted as incentive stock options,
or ISOs, and up to 925,000 shares may be awarded as either
restricted or deferred shares. In addition, no one person may
receive options exercisable for more than 500,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock in any one calendar year.
The 2004 Equity Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant
nonqualified stock options and ISOs, as defined in
Section 422 of the Code. The exercise price of an option
awarded under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan may not be less
than the closing price of the Class A Common Stock on the
last trading day before the grant. Options will be exercisable
during the period specified in each award agreement and will be
exercisable in installments pursuant to a Board-designated
vesting schedule. The Board may also provide for acceleration of
options awarded in the event of a change in control, as defined
by the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
The Board may also authorize the grant or sale of restricted
stock to participants. Each such grant will constitute an
immediate transfer of the ownership of the restricted shares to
the participant, entitling the participant to voting, dividend
and other ownership rights, but subject to substantial risk of
forfeiture for a period of not less than two years (to be
determined by the Board at the time of the grant) and
restrictions on transfer (to be determined by the Board at the
time of the grant). The Board may also provide for the
elimination of restrictions in the event of a change in control.
Finally, the Board may authorize the grant or sale of deferred
stock to participants. Awards of deferred stock constitute an
agreement we make to deliver shares of our Class A Common
Stock to the participant in the future, in consideration of the
performance of services, but subject to the fulfillment of such
conditions during the deferral period as the Board may specify.
The grants or sales of deferred stock will be subject to a
deferral period of at least one year. During the deferral
period, the participant will have no right to transfer any
rights under the award and will have no rights of ownership in
the deferred shares, including no right to vote such shares,
though the Board may authorize the payment of any dividend
equivalents on the shares. The Board may also provide for the
elimination of the deferral period in the event of a change in
control.
No grant, of any type, may be awarded under the 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan after April 30, 2014.
The Board of Directors administers the 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan. The Board of Directors may from time to time delegate all
or any part of its authority under the 2004 Plan to the
Compensation Committee of the Board. The Board of Directors has
full and exclusive power to interpret the 2004 Equity Incentive
Plan and to adopt rules, regulations and guidelines for carrying
out the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan as it may deem necessary or
proper.
Under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, current and prospective
employees, non-employee directors, consultants or other persons
who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate.
As of December 31, 2004, there are outstanding options to
purchase a total of 1,025,000 shares of Class A Common
Stock at an exercise price of $19.38 per share under the
2004 Equity Incentive Plan. These options vest quarterly over
four years, with the possible acceleration of vesting for some
options if certain performance criteria are met. In addition,
all options vest upon a change of control as more fully
described in the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
2002 Stock Incentive Plan |
The Board of Directors adopted the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan on
March 1, 2002. The purpose of the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan
is to attract and retain certain selected officers, key
employees, non-employee directors and consultants whose skills
and talents are important to the Companys operations and
reward them for making major contributions to the success of the
Company. The aggregate number of shares of
F-29
Class A Common Stock subject to the 2002 Stock Incentive
Plan is 2,000,000, all of which may be granted as incentive
stock options. In addition, no one person may receive options
for more than 500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
in any one calendar year.
The 2002 Stock Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant
nonqualified stock options and incentive stock options
(ISOs), as defined in Sections 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code). No options may be granted under the 2002
Stock Incentive Plan after May 3, 2012.
The Compensation Committee administers the 2002 Stock Incentive
Plan. The Compensation Committee has full and exclusive power to
interpret the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan and to adopt rules,
regulations and guidelines for carrying out the 2002 Stock
Incentive Plan as it may deem necessary or proper.
Under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, current and prospective
employees, non-employee directors, consultants or other persons
who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate.
As of December 31, 2004, there were outstanding options to
purchase a total of 1,814,723 shares of Class A Common
Stock at exercise prices ranging from $14.03 to $19.38 per
share under the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. These options vest
quarterly over four years, with the possible acceleration of
vesting for some options if certain performance criteria are
met. In addition, all options vest upon a change of control as
more fully described in the 2002 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
2000 Stock Incentive Plan |
The Board of Directors adopted the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan on
July 31, 2000, and subsequently amended the Plan on
February 23, 2001. The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan was
subsequently approved by the Companys stockholders on
May 4, 2001. The purpose of the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan
is to attract and retain certain selected officers, key
employees, non-employee directors and consultants whose skills
and talents are important to the Companys operations and
reward them for making major contributions to the success of the
Company. The aggregate number of shares of Class A Common
Stock subject to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan is 2,750,000, all
of which may be granted as incentive stock options. In addition,
no one person may receive options for more than
500,000 shares of Class A Common Stock in any one
calendar year.
The 2000 Stock Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant
nonqualified stock options and ISOs, as defined in
Sections 422 of the Code. No options may be granted under
the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan after October 4, 2010.
The Compensation Committee administers the 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan. The Compensation Committee has full and exclusive power to
interpret the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and to adopt rules,
regulations and guidelines for carrying out the 2000 Stock
Incentive Plan as it may deem necessary or proper.
Under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, current and prospective
employees, non-employee directors, consultants or other persons
who provide services to the Company are eligible to participate.
As of December 31, 2004, there are outstanding options to
purchase a total of 2,206,928 shares of Class A Common
Stock at exercise prices ranging from $3.75 to $14.62 per
share under the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan. These options vest,
in general, quarterly over four years, with the possible
acceleration of vesting for some options if certain performance
criteria are met. In addition, all options vest upon a change of
control as more fully described in the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
1999 Stock Incentive Plan |
In 1999, the Companys Board of Directors and the
Companys stockholders adopted the 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan to provide officers, other key employees and non-employee
directors of the Company (other than participants in the
Companys Executive Plan described below), as well as
consultants to the Company, with additional incentives by
increasing their proprietary interest in the Company. An
aggregate of 900,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
are subject to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, all of which
F-30
may be awarded as incentive stock options. In addition, subject
to certain equitable adjustments, no one person will be eligible
to receive options for more than 300,000 shares in any one
calendar year.
The 1999 Stock Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant
awards in the form of non-qualified stock options and
ISOs. All stock options awarded under the plan will be
granted at an exercise price of not less than fair market value
of the Class A Common Stock on the date of grant. No award
will be granted under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan after
August 30, 2009.
The 1999 Stock Incentive Plan is administered by the
Compensation Committee of the Board, which has exclusive
authority to grant awards under the plan and to make all
interpretations and determinations affecting the plan. The
Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the
individuals to whom awards are granted, the amount of such
award, any applicable vesting schedule, whether awards vest upon
the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined in the plan)
and other terms of any award. The Compensation Committee may
delegate to certain senior officers of the Company its duties
under the plan subject to such conditions or limitations as the
Compensation Committee may establish. Any award made to a
non-employee director must be approved by the Companys
Board of Directors. In the event of any changes in the capital
structure of the Company, the Compensation Committee will make
proportional adjustments to outstanding awards so that the net
value of the award is not changed.
As of December 31, 2004, there are outstanding options to
purchase a total of 851,754 shares of Class A Common
Stock exercisable at prices ranging from $6.4375 to
$27.875 per share under the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan.
These options vest, in general, over five years, with the
possible acceleration of vesting for some options if certain
performance criteria are met. In addition, all options vest upon
a change of control as more fully described in the 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
1998 Stock Incentive Plan |
In 1998, the Company adopted the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. An
aggregate of 1,288,834 shares of Class A Common Stock
are subject to the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, all of which may
be awarded as incentive stock options, and a maximum of
100,000 shares of Class A Common Stock may be awarded
as restricted stock. In addition, subject to certain equitable
adjustments, no one person will be eligible to receive options
for more than 300,000 shares in any one calendar year and
the maximum amount of restricted stock which will be awarded to
any one person during any calendar year is $0.5 million.
The 1998 Stock Incentive Plan permits the Company to grant
awards in the form of non-qualified stock options and ISOs
and restricted shares of Class A Common Stock. All stock
options awarded under the plan will be granted at an exercise
price of not less than fair market value of the Class A
Common Stock on the date of grant. No award will be granted
under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan after June 22, 2008.
The 1998 Stock Incentive Plan is administered by the
Compensation Committee of the Board, which has exclusive
authority to grant awards under the plan and to make all
interpretations and determinations affecting the plan. The
Compensation Committee has discretion to determine the
individuals to whom awards are granted, the amount of such
award, any applicable vesting schedule, whether awards vest upon
the occurrence of a Change in Control (as defined in the 1998
Stock Incentive Plan) and other terms of any award. The
Compensation Committee may delegate to certain senior officers
of the Company its duties under the plan subject to such
conditions or limitations as the Compensation Committee may
establish. Any award made to a non-employee director must be
approved by the Companys Board of Directors. In the event
of any changes in the capital structure of the Company, the
Compensation Committee will make proportional adjustments to
outstanding awards so that the net value of the award is not
changed.
As of December 31, 2004, there are outstanding options to
purchase a total of 1,134,758 shares of Class A Common
Stock exercisable at prices ranging from $5.92 to
$15.00 per share under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. These
options vest, in general, over five years, with the possible
acceleration of vesting for
F-31
some options if certain performance criteria are met. In
addition, all options vest upon a change of control as more
fully described in the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
1999 Executive Stock Incentive Plan |
In 1999, the Companys Board of Directors and the
Companys stockholders adopted the 1999 Executive Stock
Incentive Plan (the 1999 Executive Plan) to provide
certain key executives of the Company with additional incentives
by increasing their proprietary interest in the Company. An
aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock
or C Common Stock are subject to the 1999 Executive Plan. In
addition, no one person will be eligible to receive options for
more than 500,000 shares in any one calendar year. In
accordance with the terms of the 1999 Executive Plan, Richard W.
Weening, former Executive Chairman, Treasurer and Director, and
Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer are the sole participants in the 1999
Executive Plan.
The 1999 Executive Plan permits the Company to grant awards in
the form of non-qualified stock options and ISOs.
Stock options under the 1999 Executive Plan were granted on
August 30, 1999 and April 12, 2001 at exercise prices
ranging from $5.92 to $27.875 per share and generally vest
quarterly in equal installments over a four-year period (subject
to accelerated vesting in certain circumstances).
The 1999 Executive Plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee of the Board, which will have exclusive authority to
grant awards under the Executive Plan and to make all
interpretations and determinations affecting the 1999 Executive
Plan. In the event of any changes in the capital structure of
the Company, the Compensation Committee will make proportional
adjustments to outstanding awards granted under the 1999
Executive Plan so that the net value of the award is not
changed. As of December 31, 2004, there are outstanding
options to purchase a total of 500,000 shares of
Class C Common Stock and 406,250 shares of
Class A Common Stock under the 1999 Executive Plan.
|
|
|
1998 Executive Stock Incentive Plan |
In 1998, the Companys Board of Directors adopted the 1998
Executive Stock Incentive Plan (the 1998 Executive
Plan). An aggregate of 2,001,380 shares of
Class A or C Common Stock are subject to the 1998 Executive
Plan. In addition, no one person will be eligible to receive
options for more than 1,000,690 shares in any one calendar
year. In accordance with the terms of the 1998 Executive Plan,
Richard W. Weening, former Executive Chairman, Treasurer and
Director, and Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer, are the sole participants in the 1998
Executive Plan.
The 1998 Executive Plan permits the Company to grant awards in
the form of non-qualified stock options and ISOs.
Stock options under the 1998 Executive Plan were granted on
July 1, 1998 and are divided into three groups.
Group 1 consists of time vested options with an exercise
price equal to $14.00 per share and vest quarterly in equal
installments over a four-year period (subject to accelerated
vesting in certain circumstances). Group 2 and Group 3
also consist of time-based options which vest in four equal
annual installments on July 1, 1999, July 1, 2000,
July 1, 2001 and July 1, 2002 (subject to accelerated
vesting in certain circumstances). The first installment of both
the Group 2 options and Group 3 options were
exercisable at a price of $14.00 per share on July 1,
1999 and subsequent installments are exercisable at a price 15%
(or 20% in the case of Group 3 options) greater than the
prior years exercise price for each of the next three
years. Stock options under the 1998 Executive Plan were also
granted on April 12, 2001. These options vest quarterly in
equal installments over a four year period and were issued with
an exercise price of $5.92.
The 1998 Executive Plan is administered by the Compensation
Committee of the Board, which will have exclusive authority to
grant awards under the 1998 Executive Plan and to make all
interpretations and determinations affecting the 1998 Executive
Plan. In the event of any changes in the capital structure of
the Company, the Compensation Committee will make proportional
adjustments to outstanding awards
F-32
granted under the 1998 Executive Plan so that the net value of
the award is not changed. As of December 31, 2004, there
are outstanding options to purchase a total of
1,000,690 shares of Class C Common Stock and
906,702 shares of Class A Common Stock under the 1998
Executive Plan.
The following tables represent a summary of options outstanding
and exercisable at and activity during the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2001
|
|
|
7,135,947 |
|
|
$ |
13.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,693,000 |
|
|
|
14.74 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(231,973 |
) |
|
|
8.29 |
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(600,784 |
) |
|
|
21.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
7,996,190 |
|
|
$ |
13.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,407,200 |
|
|
|
15.35 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(233,267 |
) |
|
|
7.52 |
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(132,531 |
) |
|
|
13.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
9,037,592 |
|
|
$ |
13.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,085,000 |
|
|
|
19.38 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(162,165 |
) |
|
|
7.19 |
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(113,622 |
) |
|
|
17.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
9,846,805 |
|
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
Exercisable as of | |
|
Weighted | |
Range of Exercise | |
|
Outstanding as of | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Average | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Average | |
Prices | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
2004 | |
|
Exercise Price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
$ 2.79 - $ 5.58 |
|
|
|
73,377 |
|
|
|
5.9 years |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
|
73,377 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
$ 5.58 - $ 8.36 |
|
|
|
2,591,864 |
|
|
|
6.0 years |
|
|
$ |
6.19 |
|
|
|
2,507,037 |
|
|
$ |
6.20 |
|
|
$ 8.36 - $11.15 |
|
|
|
32,437 |
|
|
|
5.9 years |
|
|
$ |
9.11 |
|
|
|
30,561 |
|
|
$ |
9.11 |
|
|
$11.15 - $13.94 |
|
|
|
184,000 |
|
|
|
6.8 years |
|
|
$ |
12.80 |
|
|
|
153,498 |
|
|
$ |
12.79 |
|
|
$13.94 - $16.73 |
|
|
|
4,080,743 |
|
|
|
6.2 years |
|
|
$ |
14.38 |
|
|
|
3,076,741 |
|
|
$ |
14.37 |
|
|
$16.73 - $19.51 |
|
|
|
1,660,571 |
|
|
|
8.3 years |
|
|
$ |
19.02 |
|
|
|
567,465 |
|
|
$ |
18.39 |
|
|
$19.51 - $22.30 |
|
|
|
171,994 |
|
|
|
3.5 years |
|
|
$ |
20.67 |
|
|
|
171,994 |
|
|
$ |
20.67 |
|
|
$22.30 - $25.09 |
|
|
|
93,815 |
|
|
|
3.5 years |
|
|
$ |
24.19 |
|
|
|
93,815 |
|
|
$ |
24.19 |
|
|
$25.09 - $27.88 |
|
|
|
958,004 |
|
|
|
4.6 years |
|
|
$ |
27.88 |
|
|
|
958,004 |
|
|
$ |
27.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,846,805 |
|
|
|
6.3 years |
|
|
$ |
14.40 |
|
|
|
7,632,492 |
|
|
$ |
13.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002 were allocated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
25,547 |
|
|
$ |
24,678 |
|
|
$ |
76,357 |
|
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$ |
25,547 |
|
|
$ |
24,678 |
|
|
$ |
60,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-33
Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002 consisted of the
following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current expense
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
25,547 |
|
|
|
23,132 |
|
|
|
67,042 |
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
9,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred expense
|
|
|
25,547 |
|
|
|
24,678 |
|
|
|
76,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$ |
25,547 |
|
|
$ |
24,678 |
|
|
$ |
76,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit) differed from the amount
computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate of 35% for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 due to the
following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Pretax income at federal statutory rate
|
|
$ |
19,571 |
|
|
$ |
10,402 |
|
|
$ |
8,856 |
|
|
Change in beginning-of-the-year balance of the valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets allocated to income tax
expense upon adoption of SFAS No. 142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,893 |
|
|
State income tax expense, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
2,729 |
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
Nondeductible goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income on foreign operations
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
11,174 |
|
|
|
8,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income tax expense
|
|
$ |
25,547 |
|
|
$ |
24,678 |
|
|
$ |
76,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities
at December 31, 2004 and 2003 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
1,051 |
|
|
$ |
930 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other
|
|
|
2,606 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
3,657 |
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(3,241 |
) |
|
|
(5,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible and other assets
|
|
|
4,129 |
|
|
|
4,424 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,729 |
|
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
85,846 |
|
|
|
82,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax assets
|
|
|
91,704 |
|
|
|
89,446 |
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(81,330 |
) |
|
|
(78,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets
|
|
|
10,374 |
|
|
|
10,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
232,284 |
|
|
|
181,045 |
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
10,722 |
|
|
|
11,625 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
244,616 |
|
|
|
194,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
234,242 |
|
|
|
183,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$ |
233,826 |
|
|
$ |
182,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed by applying the
Federal income tax rate in effect to the gross amounts of
temporary differences and other tax attributes, such as net
operating loss carryforwards. In assessing the realizability of
deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more
likely than not that some or all of these deferred tax assets
will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax
assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income
during the period in which these temporary differences become
deductible.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, the
Company recorded deferred tax expense of $25.7 million to
establish valuation allowances against net operating loss
carry-forwards generated during the current year, resulting from
amortization of goodwill and broadcast licenses that is
deductible for tax purposes, but is not amortized in the
financial statements. This charge was partially offset by a
$0.1 million tax benefit and reduction in valuation
allowance resulting from certain adjustments made to net
operating loss carry-forwards in the Companys 2003 tax
return. In addition, the Company recorded a $22.4 million
reduction in the valuation allowance resulting from the
utilization of loss carry-forwards against current year taxable
income, and a $2.5 million reduction in the valuation
allowance resulting from the acquisition of deferred tax
liabilities in purchase accounting that are scheduled to reverse
within the Companys net operating loss carry-forward
period.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2003, the
Company recorded deferred tax expense of $23.3 million to
establish valuation allowances against net operating loss
carry-forwards generated during the current year, resulting from
amortization of goodwill and broadcast licenses that is
deductible for tax purposes, but is not amortized in the
financial statements. This charge was partially offset by a
$0.3 million tax benefit and reduction in valuation
allowance resulting from certain adjustments made to net
operating loss carry-forwards in the Companys 2002 tax
return. In addition, the Company recorded an $11.8 million
F-35
reduction in the valuation allowance resulting from the
utilization of loss carry-forwards against current year taxable
income, and a $0.9 million reduction in the valuation
allowance resulting from the acquisition of deferred tax
liabilities in purchase accounting that are scheduled to reverse
within the Companys net operating loss carry-forward
period.
During 2002 and in connection with the elimination of
amortization of broadcast licenses upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 142, the reversal of the Companys
deferred tax liabilities relating to those intangible assets is
no longer assured within the Companys net operating loss
carry-forward period. As a result, the Company determined it was
necessary to establish a valuation allowance against its
deferred tax assets, net of deferred tax liabilities unrelated
to broadcast licenses and goodwill, and recorded a
$57.9 million non cash charge to income tax expense during
the first quarter of 2002. In addition to this charge, the
Company established a valuation allowance of $7.3 million
against deferred tax assets created when certain broadcast
licenses were written down as a result of the transitional
impairment test for broadcast licenses upon the adoption of
SFAS No. 142. This $7.3 million valuation
allowance was recorded as a reduction of the tax benefit within
the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
recorded upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142. The
Company also recorded additional deferred tax expense of
$18.4 million, including $8.3 million of valuation
allowances established against net operating loss carryforwards
generated during the year ended December 31, 2002.
Management has determined that it is more likely than not that
the Company will realize the benefit of its deferred tax assets,
net of the existing valuation allowances, at December 31,
2004.
The foreign operations of the Company have incurred operating
losses, the benefit of which remains unlikely. Accordingly, the
Company has not recognized a tax benefit for these loss carry
forwards since it is not assured it could utilize the loss carry
forward in the future.
At December 31, 2004, the Company has federal net operating
loss carry forwards available to offset future income of
approximately $215.3 million, of which $3.3 million
will expire in 2012 and the remaining $212.0 will expire in the
years 2018 through 2024.
F-36
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted income (loss) per share for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 (amounts in thousands,
except per share amounts).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
|
$ |
30,369 |
|
|
$ |
5,041 |
|
|
$ |
(51,053 |
) |
|
Preferred stock dividends, deemed dividends, accretion of
discount and redemption premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,908 |
) |
|
|
(27,314 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted income (loss) per common share
before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
30,369 |
|
|
$ |
3,133 |
|
|
$ |
(78,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic income (loss) per common share
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
68,789 |
|
|
|
64,306 |
|
|
|
54,467 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
2,519 |
|
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
71,308 |
|
|
|
66,950 |
|
|
|
54,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share before the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
Cumulative effect a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share before the cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(1.44 |
) |
Cumulative effect a change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.76 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(2.20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options to purchase 2,696,754 and
1,674,914 shares of common stock were outstanding during
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively,
but not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per
common share because the option exercise price was greater than
the average market price of the common shares for the period.
The following potentially dilutive shares were not included in
the computation of diluted income (loss) for the year ended
December 31, 2002 as their effect would be antidilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
Options to purchase class A common stock
|
|
|
6,495,500 |
|
Options to purchase class C common stock
|
|
|
1,500,690 |
|
Warrants to purchase class A common stock
|
|
|
37,831 |
|
Warrants to purchase class A or B common stock
|
|
|
706,424 |
|
Warrants to purchase class B common stock
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has non-cancelable operating leases, primarily for
office space, certain office equipment and vehicles. The
operating leases generally contain renewal options for periods
ranging from one to ten
F-37
years and require the Company to pay all executory costs such as
maintenance and insurance. Rental expense for operating leases
was approximately $7.8 million, $6.9 million and
$6.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases (with initial or remaining lease terms in excess of one
year) as of December 31, 2004 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
7,361 |
|
2006
|
|
|
6,277 |
|
2007
|
|
|
5,324 |
|
2008
|
|
|
4,229 |
|
2009
|
|
|
3,109 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
12,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
39,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
As of December 31, 2004 the Company has entered into
various agreements to acquire 13 stations across
7 markets for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$81.6 million in cash and stock. The ability of the Company
to complete the pending acquisitions is dependent upon the
Companys ability to borrow under the terms of its credit
facility or to obtain additional equity and/or debt financing.
We intend to finance the cash portion of our pending
acquisitions with cash on hand, cash flow from operations, the
proceeds of borrowings under our credit facility or future
credit facilities, and other to be identified sources. There can
be no assurance the Company will be able to obtain such
financing beyond cash reserves. As of December 31, 2004,
$4.8 million of escrow deposits were outstanding related to
the pending transactions. In the event that the Company cannot
consummate these acquisitions because of breach of contract, the
Company may be liable for approximately $4.8 million in
purchase price.
The radio broadcast industrys principal ratings service is
Arbitron, which publishes periodic ratings surveys for domestic
radio markets. The Company has a five-year agreement with
Arbitron under which the Company receives programming ratings
materials in a majority of its markets. The Companys
remaining obligation under the agreement with Arbitron totals
approximately $33.0 million as of December 31, 2004
and will be paid in accordance with the agreement through July
2009.
As disclosed in prior periods, the Company, certain present and
former directors and officers of the Company, and certain
underwriters of the Companys stock were named as
defendants in the matter In Re Cumulus Media Inc. Securities
Litigation (00-C-391). The action, brought in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, was
a class action on behalf of persons who purchased or acquired
the Companys common stock during various time periods
between October 26, 1998 and March 16, 2000.
Plaintiffs alleged, among other things, violations of
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and
Sections 11 and 12(a) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Specifically, plaintiffs alleged that defendants issued false
and misleading statements and failed to disclose material facts
concerning, among other things, the Companys financial
condition, given the restatement on March 16, 2000 of the
Companys results for the first three quarters of 1999. On
May 20, 2002, the Court approved a Stipulation and
Agreement of Settlement pursuant to which plaintiffs agreed to
dismiss each claim against the Company and the other defendants
in consideration of $13.0 million and the issuance of
240,000 shares of the Companys Class A Common
Stock. Upon Court approval of the Stipulation of Settlement
Agreement, a measurement date was reached with respect to the
Companys Class A common stock to be issued under the
settlement, and the stock portion of the settlement liability
will no longer be adjusted each reporting period for changes in
the fair value of the Companys Class A Common Stock.
The Company had previously funded the $13.0 million cash
portion of the settlement on November 30, 2001. Of the
$13.0 million funded cash portion of the settlement,
F-38
$7.3 million was provided under the Companys
preexisting insurance coverage. Of the 240,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock to be issued under the settlement,
60,000 shares were initially issued in June 2002 and the
remaining 180,000 shares were issued during 2003. On
January 14, 2003, the court issued an order authorizing the
settlement agent to distribute the cash and shares to the class
members. As a result, the cash portion of the settlement was
distributed by the settlement agent to the class members in
February 2003.
The Company is also a defendant from time to time in various
other lawsuits, which are generally incidental to its business.
The Company is vigorously contesting all such matters and
believes that their ultimate resolution will not have a material
adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows. The Company is not a party to any
lawsuit or proceeding which, in our opinion, is likely to have a
material adverse effect.
|
|
16. |
Related Party Transactions |
Lewis W. Dickey, Jr. and John W. Dickey each have a 25%
ownership interest in Stratford Research, Inc.
(Stratford), an entity that provided programming and
marketing consulting and market research services to the Company
from the Companys inception in 1997 through
December 31, 2002. Effective January 1, 2003, the
Company terminated its agreement with Stratford, replacing those
previously outsourced services with an internal market research
department. Under the agreement with Stratford, Stratford
received approximately $25,000 to evaluate programming at target
radio stations. Annual strategic studies cost the Company a
minimum of $25,000 negotiable depending on competitive market
conditions. Additionally, Stratford provided program-consulting
services for contractually specified amounts during the term of
the agreement. Total fees paid to Stratford by the Company
during 2002 were $2.1 million and all amounts paid are
included as a part of station operating expenses in the
statements of operations. In determining the fair value of the
services under the agreement, management undertook at the
inception of the agreement an evaluation of third party vendors.
This evaluation supported the fair value of the pricing
arrangement between the Company and Stratford, and no
circumstances or events occurred that led management to believe
that those values were not reflective of fair value during the
period of the agreement.
On February 2, 2000 the Company loaned each of
Mr. Weening and Mr. L. Dickey $5.0 million,
respectively for the purpose of enabling Mr. Weening and
Mr. Dickey to purchase 128,000 shares of newly
issued shares of Class C Common Stock from the Company. The
price of the shares was $39.00 each, which was the approximate
market price for the Companys Class A Common Stock on
that date. The loans are represented by recourse promissory
notes executed by each of Mr. Weening and Mr. L.
Dickey, which provide for the payment of interest at
9.0% per annum or the peak rate paid by the Company under
its Credit Facility and a note maturity date of
December 31, 2003. Pursuant to Mr. L. Dickeys
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated July 1,
2001, the Company reduced the per annum interest rate on his
note to 7% and extended the maturity date of his note to
December 31, 2006. In addition, the Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement provides for forgiveness of Mr. L.
Dickeys note, either in part or in whole, upon the
attainment of certain performance targets that include both
annual financial targets and stock-price targets. In order for
any forgiveness to occur, the Companys closing stock price
must be at least $19.275 on any trading day in 2006.
Additionally, the note and accrued interest thereon will be
forgiven in its entirety, regardless of the attainment of the
annual financial targets or the 2006 stock price targets, upon a
change in control of the Company, provided that Mr. L.
Dickey is employed by the Company upon such change in control or
that his employment was terminated within the six-month period
immediately preceding a change in control. In accordance with
the agreement, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors conducted an annual review of Mr. L.
Dickeys performance for fiscal 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004
and determined that the requirements of the first trigger for
those years had been satisfied. Only in the event of the
satisfaction of the 2006 stock-price consideration, Mr. L.
Dickey would be entitled to 80% forgiveness of the loan
principal and related interest as of December 31, 2004. On
October 14, 2004, the Company entered into a Second Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement with Mr. Dickey. This
agreement, which provided for changes in Mr. Dickeys
compensation,
F-39
did not amend the provisions with respect to the reduction of
Mr. Dickeys February 2000 loan. Those provisions remain in
effect according to their original terms and conditions with no
changes, consistent with the prior employment agreement entered
into in July 2001. Interest accrues on both notes from
February 2, 2000 through the respective note maturity
dates, and all accrued interest and principal is payable on that
date. As of December 31, 2004, the original principal of
$5.0 million plus accrued interest remains outstanding from
Mr. L. Dickey. On December 31, 2003, Mr. Weening
repaid the original principal of $5.0 million plus
$0.8 million in accrued interest.
One of the Companys Directors is Ralph B. Everett.
Mr. Everett is a partner with the Washington, D.C.
office of the law firm of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky &
Walker LLP, where he heads the Firms Federal Legislative
Practice Group. The Company has historically engaged the law
firm of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP on
numerous matters dealing with compliance with federal
regulations and corporate finance activities. However, effective
December 31, 2002, the Company formally terminated its
relationship with Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
and, with the exception of the completion of certain on-going
matters, will not engage the firm on new matters going forward.
No amount was paid to Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker
LLP during 2004. Total amounts paid to Paul, Hastings,
Janofsky & Walker LLP during fiscal 2003 and 2002 were
approximately $0.1 million and $1.9 million,
respectively. Of these amounts paid in 2003 and 2002,
$0.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, were
capitalized as acquisition or financing costs. The remaining
amounts have been included as part of the corporate general and
administrative expenses in the statement of operations.
As described in note 2, the Aurora Communications, LLC and
DBBC, L.L.C. acquisitions involved counter parties who represent
related parties. The transaction with Aurora Communications, LLC
involved an affiliate of BA Capital, which owned a majority
of the equity of Aurora and owned approximately
840,000 shares of Cumulus publicly traded
Class A Common Stock and approximately 2 million
shares of Cumulus nonvoting Class B Common Stock
prior to the acquisition. BA Capital received
8.9 million shares of nonvoting Class B Common Stock
in the acquisition. A member of Cumulus Board of
Directors, Robert H. Sheridan, III, is affiliated with
BA Capital. The transaction with DBBC, L.L.C. involved
related parties including Lewis W. Dickey, Jr., the
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, John W. Dickey,
Executive Vice President of Cumulus, and their brothers David
Dickey and Michael W. Dickey. Mr. L. Dickey is also a
member of Cumulus Board of Directors.
|
|
17. |
Defined Contribution Plan |
Effective January 1, 1998, the Company adopted a qualified
profit sharing plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code. All employees meeting eligibility requirements are
qualified for participation in the plan. Participants in the
plan may contribute 1% to 15% of their annual compensation
through payroll deductions. Under the plan, the Company will
provide a matching contribution of 25% of the first 6% of each
participants contribution. Matching contributions are to
be remitted to the plan by the Company monthly. During 2004 and
2003, the Company contributed approximately $0.6 million
and $0.4 million to the plan, respectively.
F-40
|
|
18. |
Quarterly Results (Unaudited) |
The following table presents the Companys selected
unaudited quarterly results for the eight quarters ended
December 31, 2004 (in thousands, except per share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$ |
65,450 |
|
|
$ |
86,314 |
|
|
$ |
83,976 |
|
|
$ |
84,391 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
10,110 |
|
|
|
24,195 |
|
|
|
22,715 |
|
|
|
21,349 |
|
Net income (loss)(1)
|
|
|
(1,984 |
) |
|
|
13,219 |
|
|
|
9,282 |
|
|
|
9,851 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(1,984 |
) |
|
|
13,219 |
|
|
|
9,282 |
|
|
|
9,851 |
|
Basic income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$ |
57,975 |
|
|
$ |
74,520 |
|
|
$ |
74,564 |
|
|
$ |
74,912 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
8,730 |
|
|
|
21,612 |
|
|
|
19,360 |
|
|
|
18,167 |
|
Net income (loss)(2)
|
|
|
(6,320 |
) |
|
|
(1,212 |
) |
|
|
7,675 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(7,251 |
) |
|
|
(1,530 |
) |
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
Basic income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The quarter ended March 31, 2004 includes a loss on the
early extinguishment of debt of $0.5 million, which was
recorded in connection with the completion of an amendment and
restatement of the Companys credit agreement and the
related retirement and replacement of its existing eight year
term loan facility. The quarter ended September 30, 2004
includes a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of
$2.1 million, which was recorded in connection with the
completion of an amendment and restatement of the Companys
credit agreement and the related retirement and replacement of
its then existing term loans. |
|
(2) |
The quarter ended March 31, 2003 includes a loss on the
early extinguishment of debt of $3.1 million, which was
recorded in connection with the repurchase of $30.1 million
of the Notes and consisted of $2.4 million of repurchase
premiums and a $0.7 million write-off of a portion of the
related debt issuance costs. The quarter ended June 30,
2003 includes a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of
$11.1 million, which was recorded in connection with the
redemption of $88.8 million of the Notes pursuant to a
tender offer and consent solicitation completed in April 2003
and the retirement of the Companys existing eight-year
term loan facility also completed in April 2003. The
$88.8 million charge consisted of $6.0 million in
redemption premiums paid, $0.2 million in professional fees
paid and the write-off of $2.0 million of previously
capitalized debt issue costs related to the Note redemptions and
$1.5 million in professional fees paid and the write-off of
$1.4 million of previously capitalized debt issue costs
related to the term loan retirement. The quarter ended
September 30, 2003 includes a loss on the early
extinguishment of debt of $1.0 million, which was recorded
in connection with the redemption of $13.7 million of the
Notes and consisted of $0.7 million of redemption premiums
and a $0.3 million write-off of a portion of the related
debt issuance costs. |
F-41
SCHEDULE II
CUMULUS MEDIA INC.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Balance at | |
|
Provision for | |
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Doubtful | |
|
Acquired | |
|
|
|
at End | |
Fiscal Year |
|
of Year | |
|
Accounts | |
|
Stations(1) | |
|
Write-offs | |
|
of Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
2,488 |
|
|
|
3,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,532 |
) |
|
$ |
2,650 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(3,315 |
) |
|
$ |
2,488 |
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
2,633 |
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
(3,936 |
) |
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable acquired in
acquisitions. |
S-1
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cumulus Media Inc., as amended |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
|
|
Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated as of
November 18, 2004 among Cumulus Media Inc., the Lenders
party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent,
including the Credit Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2003,
as amended and restated as of November 18, 2004, among
Cumulus Media Inc., the Lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as Administrative Agent. |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Company |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
S-2